Loading...
5 FREEMAN ROAD - BUILDING INSPECTION 5. Freeman Rd. I l llll No. 153L-2 HASTINGS. MN 'LOS ANGELES•CHICAGO-LOGAN.OH MCGREGOR.TX-LOCUST GROVE,GA U.S.A. �. v-_. .._,,.,.-Trv..1r'77-•.h-..�-�qat.,..TY-�reY..�a-m!-��^^"'�rK"-�-'M.r.---^/, _-,-ws.-y.,-.....�,,; .b.r. ,_,_'4�7i"-3S ---'+7, -- - . FIELD COPY CITY OF SALEM BUILDING 0° SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT 7 VALIDATION /1'IINE� DATE July 27 1g 94 PERMIT NO. 311-94 APPLICANT Michael C. Buchanan ADDRESS 6 Webb Street Salem, Mass. 1422 _ LL0.1 UL((TI ICOM A•{ •IE{NsII Enclose Deck Dwellin NUMB or 1 PERMIT TO - I_1 siwr g OWELLINy UNITS IYPROV[Y[Mrly -Y0. VAPPOsto V{tl Freeman Road Ward 4 ZONING RI AT ILOCAI'IONI DISTRICT � \ IN0.1�� If TAIITI BETwEEI. AND 'Coos. LOT SUSDIVISIOM LOT BLOCK SIZE BUILDING IS.TO BE FT. WIDE BY FT. LONG BY FT. IN ME IGMT AND SMALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GPOUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION ITVr01 REMARKS: Build roof over existing deck and .screen in r 'OLUMER ESTIMATED COST 2,.�0� FEEMIT S 25.00 Csut.SQUJUIC,rf[T I awNER Charles Puleo " 004Ees 5 Freeman Road Salem, Mass. John J. Jennings INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS INSPECTION RECORD OA*[ MOT[ P00001111 CRITICISMS •ND REMARKS INSPECTOII � y7S Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector prior to a permit being granted No. � CITY OF SALEM /� Ward HISTOR/IC DISTRICT? Y ® d Date a IF FOR SIDING, HAS ELECTRIC Home Phone S7-9 - SO 2/2 PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Y N pOH Bus. Phone -7116- 1107 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO $crcen i✓/ 2)sc� TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby applies for a permit to build according to the following specifications: Owner's name and address C Architect's name JaM�s HawT3c, tj Builder's name 1411_G / � C 3')L��nw� Location of building, No. 5 �b 5'cic /& What is the purpose of building? De,Gk If dwelling, # of units? Material of bldng? tJco D Will building conform to law? �5 Asbestos? �G Estimated cost ZsOev, 0,-0 City Lic.# State Lic.# G(.,G 7e,�S Signature of Applicant y ,N r SIGGNED�UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY DESCRIPTION OF WORE TO BE DONE 3utl (� M90, nU F SDC/S�in9 PGK (' J X Dcsa Cr- Z t i--r-S a yoo( rHta to-r"- �S�GJ Mail Permit to: i No. / Ward APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ROOF REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING Location��2��R.� PERMIT GRANTED 7 199 Approred 0 Bull nspec V) � MARCyA-•v7' Romeo l o WALL--> � A4eVt G+i•vo 9` FOOL PROP. D fCY if' LOT 1 C A = 9,0005. ' z'~ �. r» /^1Cj0'P N4`i IY,'�l CA L> i,NA,fL 3iti�t Mf 0PCK �- - Fool, Ks ��CIYh.14 co0.�„yti 15 No•S - i/,c "Al EGR2rN AK ° )44 f0/C NEW STOP4ub� 'a Da.3R s f xl.� .� CG *a.r�ltl O�l�i Id TEAL A:/o99it,� k W � ,-f Co y e L.0 r c 33.Y3 r N � ,P M Sa.iO o AD i'IE PCA�J j EEMA� SCALE I••— 30` o” ditF R FXi3"�iuCr K' - !,{NE 0P WALL yr o NDUV rn — `� t1u.>oJ �it>cEENC-p PO/lCil � I � Q� o CM lore 5(RFEr.Ii rEl .c O Q m 1 O 1 � >_-- fs.es 1 I ' 0 ' sue �- 1 ' E Qm � Yrca� p/�2't W> 5f FLfVA�I�a�I (\ n 1 U- o 00 CL 1 i cc — —�_ El- 1 i )NE of ,vfv✓ �DOJa SdAPEPAtVA flAsurarj - �9^pno mvc.a.rga oR caun.ee U (� atv jwoo -R[MOVE �,• •� — r• se asc[c+.d by •wwet 'I - / MOVA9llb. SC�2LFNS Q E R1 47W 4W2� -70 Off "V59A .i"�• ' C\ I � !„, :?,YF dos REVISIONS: •ra, - —__ ¢Y s.rE -A tlr tkuse'a. r 1 .1 t ��ly'[I11� DKKIN� } PEvEL SCrtEEN> � DATE: Ar'^l_ !`/ i9Y4 �aRTH � L�vA-rio,,� �.FERFD 4CALE ft N _r GTE VJN" (21No!f`TL)lC j® VEr21f i ALL �ONDI?1O�15, DIME N51a/Ji� f2EfMFiiJ I�©. x15`rIN� A-T 61'rE \.A/ILL D61Alq Ceklc> AvHf_)Z> lDywg. No. AILCOt�G ?Z%� 4- Lo CAL EA L)LA'7 if),1 :5 _ Tits of ,Salem, �ffittssadjusrttz ✓y� M �gnttrb of C°-klrpenl C/ 0,r • . �� 14u DECISION ON THE PETITION OF-CHARLES &- PAULETTE PULEO FOR VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PERMIT AT-5 FREEMAN ROAD (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held May 18, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Stephen O'Grady, Gary Barrett and Associate Member Nina Cohen. Member Hill was present but excused himself from the proceedings because of his personal relationship with the Petitions. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance and Special Permit to expand and extend side setback to allow the rebuilding of a screened in porch and a deck. The property is located in the Residential Single Family District (R-1) . The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES & PAULETTE PULED FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCE AT 5 FREEMAN ROAD, SALEM Gy page two C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to ttie`f public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 3 Is, The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petitioners proposal. 2. Neighbors of the petitioners and abutters to the subject property appeared in support of the petition. 3. The porch and deck to be constructed by the petitioners will be identical to one which previously existed on the site and which was removed by the petitioners upon learning that said porch and deck encroached upon side yard setback. 4. The only physical exterior change to the structure to be constructed will be that a portion of the porch and deck will now be screened. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 4. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, codes ordinances and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES & PAULETTE PULED FOR A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT AT 5 FREEMAN ROAD, SALEM page three 0 y 4. Petitioners shall obtain a building permit prior to constructia.�,- 5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. o. Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony^. ! h the existing structure. �'7 51s Variance and Special Permit Granted May 18, 1994 Gary V Barrett, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Cfv of"ittXPm, '�Uttssarhusrffs (office of flje (ITifg (dauncil (tlifg fall COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE MATTHEW A.VENO WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT 2007 2007 MARK E. BLAIR CHERYL A. LAPOINTE LUCY CORCHADO THOMAS H. FUREY CITY CLERK MICHAEL SOSNOWSKI JOAN B. LOVELY JEAN M. PELLETIER ARTHUR C.SARGENT III LEONARD F. O'LEARY MATTHEW A.VENO PAUL C. PREVEY JOSEPH A.O'KEEFE, SR. July 18, 2007 Mr. Charles Puleo Planning Board Chairman 5 Freeman Road Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Puleo: At a regular meeting of the Salem City Council, held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, July 12, 2007, the enclosed ordinance was adopted as amended for first passage by a roll call vote of 1 tyeas, 0 nays, 0 absent. Please note the amendment reflects the number of parcels included in this rezoning. This amended ordinance includes only 6 parcels identified as 06-0004, 06-0006, 06-0010, 06-0015, 06-0017 and 06-0019. The second and final passage will be brought up at the next regular City Council meeting on September 13, 2007. Yours Truly, C1,2 CH YL A. LAPOINTE CITY CLERK Enclosure Cc: Lynn Duncan, City Planner Thomas St. Pierre, Zoning Enforcement Officer SALEM CITY HALL • 93 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MA 01970-3592 • WWW,SALEM.COM 10111if1J of 0airm In the year Two thousand and seven An (®rainanre amend an Ordinance and map relative to Zoning Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Salem, as follows: ,sraton I. In accordance with the requirements of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 5, that the Industrial District be rezoned to a Residence-1 (R-1) District to include the following real property on Clark Avenue, as shown on the City of Salem Assessor's Map 6. Parcels 06-0004 22 Clark Avenue 06-0006 24 Clark Avenue 06-0010 20 Clark Avenue 06-0015 25 Clark Avenue 06-0017 23 Clark Avenue 06-0019 21 Clark Avenue Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by City Charter. In City Council April 12, 2007 Referred to the Planning Board to schedule a joint public hearing. June 18; 2007 Joint Public Hearing Held Advertised in the Salem News on May 29, 2007 and June 5, 2007 Referred to the Planning Board for recommendation Planning Board recommendation received June 28, 2007 was referred to the Committee on Ordinances, Licenses and Legal Affairs In City Council July 12, 2007 Adopted as amended for first passage by roll call vote of 11 yeas, 0 nays, 0 absent A motion for immediate reconsideration in the hopes it would not prevail was denied. ATTEST: CHERYL A. LAPOINTE CITY CLERK