12-16 FOSTER STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 12-I6 FOSTER STREET
BOARD of ASSESSORS
n
93 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY HALL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617)745-9595 Ext.261
n t�
August 10, 1988 ; c
-T7
i�
ell
C'O
Mrs. Josephine R. Fusco
City Clerk
City of Salem
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Mrs. Fusco:
Please be advised that the three-proposed condominium_town
sors
houses to be built on Asses ' Parcel 1126-0460 have been
assigned the street addresses offl.-2 114 and-l6 Foster-Street.
1112 shall-be`the unit nearest-No'rth=Street; while 1116 sha-1-17
tie--t-he=unt�fieare t Franklin Street. �f-
-'Ver r ly yours,
Peter M. Caron
Chief Assessor
PMC:mjg
cc: Postmaster Joseph J. Leccese
Chief Joseph F. Sullivan, Fire Department
Margaret R. Hagerty, Principal Clerk, Water Dept.
yWYlliam H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings
Engineering Dept. , City of Salem
Mr. Richard Lutts, 71B Wharf St. , Salem
s
+,cop
�4
Ctv of ttlem, ttssttcljuse##s DEC 14 3 of FM '87
Paurb of �kppwl FILE#
+ �M
�olMn[
CITY CLERK. SALEM, MASS.
DECISION_ON_THE-PET--ITION OF RICHARD LUTTS FOR A VARIANCE
FOR 12 & 14 FOSTER ST. (B-1 ) -
A hearing on this petition was held October 28, 1987 and continued until
December 2, 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman;
Messrs. , Fleming, Stout and Associate Members Dore and Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
The petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a variance from lot area
requirements to allow construction of three residential units in a two story
building. Property is located in a B-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was no opposition;
2. Parking in this area is at a premium and on site parking would
help alleviate this situation.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special. conditions exist which especially affect the subject
property but not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
a substantial hardship on the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RICHARD LUTTS FOR A VARIANCE
FOR 12 & 14 FOSTER ST. , SALEM
page tw
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance
requested , subject to the following conditions:
1 . Building to be constructed in accordance with plans submitted;
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau be adhered to;
3. Proper numbering be obtained from the City Assessor;
4. Six (6) on site parking spaces be maintained as per plans submitted;
5. Landscaping be done as per plans submitted;
6. Building Permit be obtained;
7. Certificate of Occupancy be obtained for each unit.
GRANTED
yJZamJe-sZiC. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
60PEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER EUo. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
Dc THIS PEG'SLOtl If: THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
P^ "CSS. CE'r,ERAL LAi;S, CHAPTER BO$. SECTION 11, THE VARIANC° OP SPEC1CL
RE');. S`i 4LL NOT TA.`;E EFFECT UNTIL F CC Pf OF THE GECi:I:.:. BEAP:"'S THE rccT.
F.CATi.;PI Of THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NG AFPE�.L FFP. CELT!
OP THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT HAS IIEEN DISMISSED CP. CE:iiED IS
RELC!;U:S IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NA;:E OF THE CS'f 31
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL