Loading...
10-12 FIRST STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION (2) 1.0-12 FT-RST STREET I i I 4 S ' F ` mow. c® � � © (Z'In C City of Salem Ward . s 1000 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO BUILD ADDITION, MAKE ALTERATIONS OR NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT-Applicant to complete all items in sections:I, II, Ill, IV, and IX. I. AT(LOCATION) 12 First Street ZONINGDISTRICT R 3 LOCATION 1140.) (STREET) OF BETWEEN Highland AND traders Way BUILDING (CROSS STREET) (CROSS T) LOT SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE II. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A -D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE-FOR"DEMOLITION'USE MOST RECENT USE 1 ❑ New building Residential Nonresidential 2 ❑ Addition fff residential,enter number o1 new 12 ❑ One family 18 ❑ Amusement,recreational lousing units added,it any,in part D,13) 19 ❑ Chmoh,other religious 13 ❑ Two or more family-Enter number 3113 Alteration(See 2 above) of units ....................................................... 20 ❑ Industrial 21 Parking garage 4 ❑ Repair replacement 14 ❑ EnteTranr nu hotel,motel,or dormitory- 22 ❑ Service station,repair garage Enter number o1 units ........................... 5 ❑ Wracking(if muttilamily residential,enter number 23 ❑ Hospital,institutional of units in building in Part D, 13) 15 ❑ Garage 24 ❑ Office,bank,professional 6 ❑ Moving(relocation) 16 ❑ Carport 25 ❑ Public utility 26 ❑ School,library,other educational 7 ❑ Foundation only 17 ❑ Other-Specify - 27 ❑ Stores,mercantile B.OWNERSHIP 28 ❑ Tanks,towers 8 Private(individual,corporation,nonprofit 29 ❑ Other-Specity institution,etc.) 9 ❑ Public(Federal,State,or local government C.COST (Omit cents) Nonresidential-Describe in detail proposed use of buildings,e.g.,food processing plant, machine shop,laundry building at hospital,elementary school,secondary school,college, parochial school,parking garage for department store,rental office building,office building 10. Cost of improvement ......................................................... $ at industrial plant.If use of existing building is being changed,enter proposed use. To be installed but not included in the above cost Cell Site aElectrical........................................................................... b. Plumbing.......................................................................... c. Heating,air conditioning............................................. d. Other(elevator,etc.)..................................................... 11. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT $ 33 III. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING -For new buildings and additions, complete Parts E-L;demolition, complete only Parts J&M, all others skip to IV E. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF FRAME F. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF HEATING FUEL G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL I. TYPE OF MECHANICAL 30 ❑ Masonry(wall bearing) 35 ❑ Gas -40 ❑ Public or private company Will there be central air 31 ❑ Wood frame 36 ❑ Oil 41 ❑ Private(Septic tank,etc.) conditioning? 32 ❑ Structural steel 37 ❑ Electricity 44 ❑ Yes 45 ❑ No 33 ❑ Reinforced concrete 38 ❑ Coal H. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY Will there by an elevator? 34 ❑ Omer-Specify 39 ❑ Other-Specify 42 ❑ Public or private company 46 ❑ Yes 47 ❑ No 43 ❑ Private(vrell,cistern) ONS J.48. Number M. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES: 4a. Number of stones ............................................................ 49. Total square feetf area, all Boors,based o Has Approval from Historical Commission been received n extefloorrrior exterior dimensions ......................................................................... for any structure over fifty(50)years? Yes_ No_ 50. Total land area.so.B....................................................._ Dig Safe Number K.NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES Pest Control: 51. Enclosed ._......................................................................... HAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED? 52. Outdoors.................................. ........................ Yes No L RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY Water: 53. Enclosed .....................:...............................................:........ Electric: Gas: Full....:...................................... Sewer: 54. Number of bathrooms DOCUMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED Partial.............................. BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IV. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Historic District? Yes_ No X (If yes, please enclose documentation from Hist. Com.) Conservation Area? Yes_ No X (If yes, please enclose Order of Conditions) Has Fire Prevention approved and stamped plans or applications? YesX__ No Is property located in the S.R.A. district? Yes_ No—X Comply with Zoning? Yes__X No (If no,enclose Board of Appeal decision) Is lot grandfathered? Yes_ No__XL (If yes,submit documentation/if no,submit Board of Appeal decision) If new construction, has the proper Routing Slip been enclosed? Yes_ No_ Is Architectural Access Board approval required? Yes_ No_X_ (If yes,submit documentation) Massachusetts State Contractor License# Salem License# Home Improvement Contractor# Homeowners Exempt form (if applicable) Yes_ No— CONSTRUCTION TO BE COMMENCED WITHIN SIX(6) MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT If an extension is necessary, please submit CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY: in writing to the Inspector of Buildings. V. IDENTIFICATION - To be completed by all applicants 61 7 1.3 1 Namepp Mailing address-Number,street,city,and state ZIP Code Tel.No. 1. Pt d0 Zi 95/7t Owner or Lessee ] J / ' z. Allign'c relmn & eX q6 a! 4'. oy D X07-1 ContractorBuilder's Ae A E S nw t Ynna i AQ. 0 6$ License No. 6q Z-S678 3. 7- /- al$0I SO Architect or Engineer g3z-7f I hereby certify that the proposed work is authorized by the owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his authorized agent and we agree to oor&rm to all applicable laws of this jurisdiction. Sig appli Address Application date 3 /� DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE VI. VALIDATION Building F / Q FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit number Building use Group Permit issued /o� f 7 t9� Fire Grading Building Permit Fee $ I - Live Loading Certificate of Occupancy $ Occupancy Load Approved by: Drain Tile $ Plan Review Fee $ TITLE NOTES AND Data - (For department use) Y PERMIT TO BE MAILED TO: DATE MAILED: Construction to be started by: =- Completed by: o , VI ZONING PLAN EXAMINERS NOTES DISTRICT USE FRONT YARD SIDE YARD SIDE YARD REAR YARD NOTES SITE OR PLOT PLAN -For Applicant Use O N Pequot Highlands 12 First Street Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Telephone: (978) 745-4884 Fax: (978) 745-8166 September 20, 2007 @07Mr. Joseph E. Barbeau, Jr. City of Salem Public Property Department 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: 10 First Street Laundry Room Ventilation 10 First Street Rooftop Liahting Dear Mr. Barbeau, Jr.: This is to confirm our previous conversations and to respond to your letter regarding the above-referenced items: • The existing exhaust ventilation in the laundry room has been restored by activating the air handler on the roof. • We have replaced the faulty fixture on the rooftop of 10 First Street and also relocated the direction of the lighting on the fixtures located on the roof of 12 First Street to better distribute the lighting throughout the parking lot. We thank you for your efforts to keep our community safe and in compliance with the health codes. If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at (978) 745-4884 or by email lalcalaipwinnco.com Sincerely, Lizete A. . cal ARM®, CAHM Property anage LI1]nResidential WinuResidential does not discriminate against any person because wof race,color, e religion,sex,sexual orientation,handicap,familial status or national origin. CITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT KIMBE.RLEY DRISCOIL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET 4 SALEM,MASSACHUSE'CI:S 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 July 24, 2007 C.-Ock, Pequot H Limited Partnership 10 First Street Salem, MA 01970 To the Management; Per our conversation of Thursday July 19, 2007 regarding the lack of mechanical ventilation in the Laundry Room, it is required under 780 CMR, Section 1205.2, the State Building Code that this space be ventilated. Please see to it that the existing system (if there is one) is made to work, or that a system independent to that space be installed. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please feel free to call this office at (978) 745 —9595, ext. 5643. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. Since ely, J ph E. Bazbeau, r. Assistant Building Inspector/ Local Inspector CC: file ovolr CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT m 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 �+po FAX: 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR November 14, 2006 Winn Residential Weam Alsarabi,Property Manager Pequot Highlands 12 First Street Salem,Ma. 01970 RE: Building Problems 10 First Street Dear Ms. Alsarabi: This Department has received the same documents the Board of Health received regarding water infiltration and subsequent mold problems. The Mass State Building Code 780 CMR, Section 1405.3.10 requires masonary walls to be flashed and or sealed to effectively resist water infiltration. You are directed to secure the services of a Registered Engineer or Architect to investigate the source of the water leaks and to design repairs. Also,please keep us apprised of any work going on inside the building. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order, your appeal is to the Board of Building Regulations and Standards in Boston(B.B.R.S.)within the Department of Public Safety. If you have any questions,please contact me directly. Sincerely, Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner Cc: Joanne Scott, Health Agent Janet Dionne, Senior Sanitarian PEQUOT HIGHLANDS 12 First Street • Salem,Massachusetts 01970 • Telephone 978-745-4884•Facsimile 978-745-8166 May 26, 1998 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer RE: Apartment N-308 Dear Mr. Tremblay, I would like to take this time to respond to your letter of 5/22/98. In your letter you expressed Ms. Fleming's concerns that her daughter could possibly climb over the guard rail in place and fall out the window because the heating element could be used as a step. Please be advised that we have taken the following steps to resolve her complaints: • In the living room and first bedroom,the inoperable heating units were removed entirely,thus eliminating anything that could be used as a'step. • In the remaining two bedrooms the heating elements are still operable. Per your suggestion,we raised the guard rails an additional 6"to prevent any chance of her child being able to climb over them. I hope that our actions satisfy any concerns that you may have regarding this situation. Thank you so much for your assistance and understanding in this matter. Should you require any additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me at the above number. Sincerely, Deirdre Wyman Assistant Property Manager A Community of Duality Provided by Winn Management Company,Inc.,Boston,Massachusetts Pequot`Highlands does not discriminate against any person because of race,color,religion,sex,sexual orientation,handicap,familial status or national origin. Cite of Salem' '41afSf5arbU!5ettq Public Prupertp Mepartment Cid �3uilbing Mepartment One 9palem Oreen (978)7459595 (ext. 380. Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer May 22 , 1998 Cynthia Wood Pequot Highlands 12 First Street Salem, Mass . 01970 RE : Apartment #308 Dear Cynthia : This office received a call from unit #308 Mrs . Fleming, concerned over the guard rail at the window locations . Her concerns were that her daughter could possibly climb over the rail and fall out the window because the heating element could be used as a step . I believe it would be in the best interest of the Housing Authority to install an additional 6" rail in unit #308 , and in any other unit that may have over active children that request the additional guard . Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter . Sincerely, Leo E . Tremblay Inspector of Bui7in'gs LET: scm cc : Councillor Lovely, Ward 3 . m t t :- E1.4rc rc. o. copy �.�� CERTIFI TE OF OCCUPANCY .LL I . 1CITY OF SALEM issued. G `� Permit N 97 I SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 tity of Salem Building Dept. DATE TUI V 717 111 97 PERMIT NO. ?7 i-19=17 I APPLICANT 1/R IJ-1,1 rrh]ST P1 ICT ION ADDRESS C;ILRFr 7 SRF) (CONTR'S LICENSE) CITY 9Tr1j Wj STATE MP ZIPCODE J'C1=•1717-' TEL.NO. 6. 7-828—a474 1 NUMBEROF PERMITTO RFpATR RI=G1 Ar1=M1=N ( ) STORY TlAn FIR IYI[IRF FQMT1 Y DWELLING UNITS '521 I (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NQ (PROPOSED USE) ZONING AT(LOCATION) T'h1 h1 FT RS"r STREF-T i -• DISTRICT R3 '1 INO.1 (STREET( I I BETWEENI-1TC.HI LaNMn LaVFNIIIF AND 1=TRST STREET (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) O SUBDIVISION MAL: ] = LOT 717171rBLOCK SIZE rl. �8__ ACRES (. BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BV FT.LONG BY FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION i TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS:--R"000'-T '='1,171 IIIVT'I ArjQ '?T'MPm TS Ivl M M_ i AREA OR@ PERMIT @@ j VOLUME ESTIMATED COST$ r-.45, A717 $ 1 FEE ?BRIT., Qil7f (CUBICISOUARE FEET) OWNER_P,9QLf nT A290FI-ATES BUILDING DEPT. ADDRESS FANfgjltl HAI I BY ° .•' �iw 4 yhq• k_ . .•• el', -• Tits of _'-5airm, 'Museadjusetts 3 9 �Rnttrb of Appral r JUL 2 213 ` 5 + 9 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.REQUESTING ;A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ATT- FIRST STREET%(R-ij A hearing on this petition was held June 19, 1996 with the following Board members present: Gary Barrett, Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Joseph Ywuc and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, requests a Variance to install three antennas for the property located at 12 First Street. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner requests a variance to allow installation of three antenna arrays, each containing several panels for wireless communication relays, atop the multi-family residence at 12 First Street, known as Pequot Apartments. 2 . Petitioner stated that the proposed equipment, relying on digital technology, requires installation at the height of land. In the City of Salem, the Pequot Apartment site represents one of the highest points above sea level, and would be an appropriate place to install the technology without having to erect additional structures. 3. Installation of the petitioner's antennae would benefit the City of Salem by enabling customers to transmit emergency and commercial messages using the digital technology currently available. 4 . There was no opposition to the proposed variance. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. s DECISION OF SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12 FIRST STREET 9R-1 ) page two Dui ;2 'Z !L3 iri X95 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to_,_ public good and without nullifying and substantial f derogating ;fr'6)b the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. Petitioner shall obtain building permit prior to beginning any construction. 4. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. Variance Granted June 19, 1996 Nina Cohen, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal 1 � - - a \1 fl�itn of ��Nlem, aseadjusetts i; s Bnttrd of '�upeal � <y J - OO �"R n N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NEW YORK CELLULAR GEOGRAPHIC-„SERVICE_AREA,,INC. (PETITIONERS) WINN MANAGEMENT (OWNERS) FOR VARIANCES AT�,12 FIRST_STREET__-77 (R-3) A hearing on this petition was held April 21, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; George Ahmed, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette and Associate LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners are requesting a variances to allow existing antennas to be upgraded. Property is located in an R-3 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The change relative to the height of the antennas will not impact the abutting neighborhood. 2. The change in antennas will allow petitioner to better serve their customers and thus allow for better cellular communications. T «y DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NEW YORK CELLULAR GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA, INC. FOR VARIANCES AT 12 FIRST STREET, SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. The finish of the antennas shall be dulled so as to prevent any reflection from them. 5. Petitioner shall immediately remedy any complaints relative to radio or televisions interference. 6. No more than three (3) clusters of three (3) antennas may be placed on site as per the plans submitted. 7. No new lights are to be added to the property at 12 First St. VARIANCE GRANTED April 21, 1993 Richard A. Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal � 3 a < s :no L w LS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NEW YORK CELLULAR GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA, INC. FOR VARIANCES AT 12 FIRST STREET, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. a Board of Appeal m o y a T Z n Z N � r .c nnnq�b `y z� �l1ItT oftt1Pm CM88tIth1I8Ptt8 �Snttrb of �Air}tettl DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NEW YORK CELLULAR GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE, INC. c/o NYNEK MOBILE COMMUNICA_TION_rCO..(PETITIONERS) , WINN MANAGEMENT (OWNERS) FOR VARIANCES AT 12 FIRST ST. (R-3) A hearing on the petition was held on October 18, 1989 with the following Board Members present: James M. Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Febonio, and Lu-inski. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others, and notices of the hearing were properly published in The Salem Evening News, in accordance with the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner represented by Attorney Richard S. Novak, is requesting variances to allow for the construction of a cell site at 12 First Street for the purpose of cellular radio broadcast for mobile telephone service. The locus is in an R-3 district. The petitioner previously filed a direct appeal with the Board on April 19, 1989 which appeal asked for variance relief to construct a cell site which included mounting six ten foot antennas on two foot mounts on the penthouse level of the existing structure. The petitioner now asks for variance re- lief to construct a cell site which will include the mounting of six three foot antennas on the roof level of the existing structure which require no mounts. Thus, the proposed antennas will not exceed the height of the existing structure. On September 7, 1989, the Planning Board unanimously voted to grant a determination of substantial change from the previously filed Appeal. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Appeal voted 4-0 that the petition was substantially changed. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building of structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in- volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating frau the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordianace. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The substantial change relative to the height of the antennas will insure that the existing neighborhood will not be impacted. 2. The propsed use will be compatible with the residential uses of the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally. 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. That all construction be as per the plans submitted to the Board of Appeal . 2. That all the requirements of the Salem Fire Department, relative to fire safety, be strictly adhered to. 3. That the petitioner irmtediately remedy any complaints relative to radio or television interference. 4. That no new lights be added to the property at 12 First Street. 5. That the finish of the antennas be dulled to prevent reflection. 6. That no more than six (6) antennas be placed on the property at 12 First Street. 7. That all construction be in accordance with City and State Building codes. VARIANCE GRANTED James M. Fleming, Chan A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARDANDTHE CITY CLERK ;' any, shnII be m3ev, Lr _ and 'Ji , cec r In .. - cr th / I is r S. e^o..m DOARD OF APPEAL 57 Aurora Lane Salem, MA 01970 August 31, 1989 CO) C.. � c o p v+ F ^m G nm Mr. Maurice Martineau m m o co Building Inspector ;o m City of Salem One Salem Green y Salem, MA 01970 Re: Nynex Antennae Installation at Pequot Highlands Dear Mr. Martineau: Enclosed is a copy of a letter Nynex forwarded to the Sanctuary Condominium Trust via our property management company. As the installation of antennae at this location was denied by the Salem Board of Appeals earlier this year, I am concerned as to their ability to have proceeded as indicated by their letter. Also, as I mentioned during our telephone conversation, a number of residents have been complaining about unexplained garage door openings recently which creates a very serious safety problem as it allows access to the units. I have been told by garage door installation personnel that cellular equipment could cause this type of spontaneous opening. Thank you for looking into this matter, and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Sandra 0. Hallett Trustee Sanctuary Condominium Trust SOH:m Enclosure l rr. ...r•a`urri�- a; (CItv Of $aCiISSttthll8Ptt4, AUG (peal 5pcums.J'� � DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NEW YORK CELLULAR GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA INC. FOR A VARIANCE'AT 12 FIRST STREET(R=2>) - - _ A hearing on this petition was held June 14, 1989 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Febonio, Luzinski and Tutting. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner, represented by Attorney Richard S. Novak, is requesting Variances to construct a cell site for the purpose of cellular radio broadcast for mobile phone services at 12 First St. The equipment would be placed in a first floor room, .with six (6) antennae being installed on the roof. The locus is in an R district. The b'ariance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the Purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the Nearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was substantial neighborhood opposition to the petition. 2. The six (6) proposed antennae on the roof would not be in harmony with the neighborhood. 3. The building at 12 First Street has been given special tax status relative to its residential use. A commercial use of the building in not in harmony with that tax-exempt residential use. L. .he petitioner offered no evidence of hardship. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district generally; _. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve a substantial hardship on the petitioner; DECISION' ON THE PETITION OF NEW YORK CELLULAR GEOGRAPHIS SERVICE AREA RNC. FOR A VARIANCE AT 12 FIRST STREET, SALEM r page two 3. Desirable relief cannot be granted '.without substantial detriment to the public Food or without nullifying ana substantially aerogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted three (3) in favor two (2) opposed (Mr. Bencai and Mr. Nutting) to the granting of the variance reouested. T:ce request is denied due to the failure of the petitioner to obtain four (4) affirm- ative votes. DENIED ` /James M. Fleming, -Esq. , Cha an A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY -.LERK r.;nnn 17 ar ttl and sh ll h^_ p '1 r..it'.in 20 days ^_ Miss. GenW ns. hapten Fr)3, .veer the date or tiling of llns decisicn in the ottici of the �.ty C'rark. ,� �� ,,n _, me Variance i'Vrs J9'1 to Pn]55 - Irl l !_ pr ``p .m "ermit r7rlrlied helell •.'.� c fee t'I a ropy of the d.oTon, dedlnng the cei iticatu i of :Ile city rk that 20 da'/s have elepsud ;ind no appejl has been filed, cr that, if such appaal hes been filed, that it has been dismi.sced or denied is recor;fed in the Soath Essex Registry of Deeds- eeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or (g Lecorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL n 6 S �,M)T&00ArVA�Ar- A,3 TC_A-1NA4 rEAM[ A-C� 11TCtlJAST:INK �.l1NTL1,1fJAe F:I•AVC �/1rJTf..1�w T'lz_A ^4: 0 ('/hP�.PE 1- wAL I 1 7 II PLAN t 1D i II y ! i I I Ilii Z Y MAGH Imo! 3x3xVA L FRANC . - /hP-- ITrITI I c_ I � I -+T E ANTNW� WD B.cC�-KENO 1 '�� ' L — — — � J ' A 9A C'�J Lk 1,4 r_.�j m E-L EVA TO R I 'L ROOM ROOF I — f k rLoor I - _CA8LE5 TO 6E ROUTED TO ANIENNAS� � L� � I - (FINAL LOCATION OF ANTEN)lS PSY NYNE J� E><I ST I ti/G GAbttS ON 24 IN CARCC- TRAY(WITH COVER) To 89/PGE EXISTING -MELHAN►OAL EOPMT. .GROUND AND ANTENNA NftES RISINQ, FROM �(� 2nP�-r GAL T27H FLOOR AELow 3 DRAWIRG FLA �I � I i -- - -f k _ _ _ _- _ I r i I PIF r. � i o�4K--e���l1c �• � �• r I y ( — X%� JUS ""( GGA• I T d r C t _ f ti li - k" >r 4 11 Q�Nrl t/� \` I it y/ r, y J yI 1 I „ f/✓� Y.`.f I/" V.-�.�-` � �� � � — — �f.-^ F"�J 1 • � tl: VYV`I � '�- _— Y xl.: 1 • .n I i I 7,. ��55 - I � G� � J Av�_�A'-t �ILS I � �. (oI0lQi5 r`evl LoCATkQQ c Ani-CcA)KIA �' �aPcoRi ADDED SeGT 2 2 / 'i c-t .� ► NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS CO. WOBURN, MASSACHUSETTS PA�i,I, t�fi vP G,•`,M , , ✓�N 2- ���AII� � � I !i ' --,� D. BAUGH & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHANDRA ASSOCIATES — �.1 ^I' T� � :f,� ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS ENGINEERS NOfi NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MASSACHUSETTS 1 i. GLt1'i� 1 U f2•r��, 1� Hill . , LF* � � `� �,F��.-1.-1f''� i�IN-a PROJECT TITLE -I VVPE- io r,F rrr, . e - t N �,D'': ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT FACILITIES - CELL SITE -a--?� ter, r, I ,�; ,� � � r�,_y ; .�r • w r:_ PEQUOT HIGHLANDS BUILDING JlA. T � I ;., SALEM MASSACHUSETTS 2� PAZ,= ry?L�D ;= � DRAWING GAF clirl rs _ARCHITECTURAL & EIECTRICAl, F` : ROOF PLAN G�GALF APPROVED BY NMCC SITE CODE DATE SHEET APRIL 1989 p, 2. � >� b INI%Il� ( 1� I1- 141 ✓ G (F GG"�;fir NMCC CONST. PROJ. MGR. NMCC SITE NAME SCALE� 4 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS AS NOTED ' I August 27, 1989 Mr. Mike Lussier Town Line Management Hamlet Condominiums 290 Elliot Street Ashland, MA 01721 Dear Mr. Lussier: On behalf of NYNEX Mobile Communications Company, I would like to alert you to the fact that we have installed a temporary antenna on top of the Pequot Highlands building from August 28 - September 4. We have installed this antenna so that the residents of the Hamlet Condomium complex can experience directly what it would be like to have a cellular antenna on top of a building in their neighborhood. The placement of this antenna comes as a result of the neighborhood's concern over our first effort to place an antenna array on this building. The first proposal recommended that we install a series of 15 ft. antennae on top of the penthouse for optimum transmission quality. This proposal was rejected due to the appearance of the antenna extending 35 feet over the roof and obstructing the view of the residents in the surrounding area. In order to demonstrate our second proposal, which significantly differs from our first proposal, both technically and aesthetically, we have installed the temporary antenna at Pequot Highlands. It is only 10 feet above the roof and is not visible from the street, due to the parapet wall, which surrounds the roof. It should also be noted that this antenna will not interfere with the television or radio reception in these residences. ` Page 2 - NYNEX Mobile Communications This Salem site location is of vital importance to the development of our cellular telephone network. Our revised proposal requires NYNEX Mobile Communications Company to re-engineer the total northeast sector of its cellular system in order to accommodate this new configuration. By virtue of its location, Pequot Highlands provides us with the capabilities to provide high quality cellular service to our customers. NYNEX Mobile Communications Company is very aware of the residents' concerns regarding the installation of a mobile antenna on top of Pequot Highlands. As a result we have gone to great measures to address these concerns of aesthetic placement and saftey. We would like the opportunity to answer questions you have regarding the temporary antenna we have installed. Please call Brian Powers in our Real Estate Department at 617/932-1200 with any concerns you may have. Sincerely, Robert F. Stott Director of Engineering NYNEX Mobile Communications Company Aug-22-97 10 : 17A Keith Construction. Inc. 617 828 8474 �o P .06 ./ w r' �F1�ZUdT t+llo�tLA'N.L�i // •,_.�J- /� /./ �XI�f"It'�lo Gp�}1oITloN �yg 111 O aj 117 UJ -,y i N Py.nTn a� — i to ++ il yr - .kk Sit - uj _�. . 7 a oir ro r�T+c, cc •i1re6�r;1<c, 1 i Aug-22-97 10 : 18A Keith Construction, Inc. 617 828 8474 P .07 �f • 7 1 1 , ' v � 1°I�K Ul LJp NE • qR.w aM 'c•: is 1 IN: � arnn► I � I _ f U n oC ` It JI.- ,u F '1� d � yRx- ILIII �I f W1 1 e�.R y O I) -i0•cr • CMlfrj � 1 �._ 1 ( Q 111 ( OIA peAf 10 Ir.0 '.n W,, ' f— or 'u I I a "&i, of#iYw0,rl rl f&j�A 41 NORTHEASTERN REGIONALO RECEIVED TEWKSBURY HOSPITAL EffitF SALEM,MASS. TEWKSBURY 01876 TEL; 610'B51'9261 February 23, 1984 Mr. Joseph Lubas Salem Board of Health 9 North Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: [-l2 First Street Pequot Highl d Apts. Salem, MA Dear Mr. Lubas: Enclosed is the inspection report from out February 9 and 16, 1984 site visits to the above-cited property. Please take the appropriate actions to ensure that the necessary structural repairs are made come spring to rectify the water seepage problem. Also, please forward to this office copies of correspondence with Winn Management Company confirming and detailing these work plans. Thank ,you very much for ,your cooperation. Sincerely yours, _ Naida M. Gavrelis District Sanitarian Encl. / cc: Salem Building Dept. ✓ James Harger C. Gagnon M. Keohen D. Rocheford J . Anderson Howard Wensley, MDPH