Loading...
ZONING AMENDMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW,BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING Planning Board Report to Council Regarding Zoning Amendment _— BOARD OF ASSESSORS 17 93 WASHINGTON STREET.CITY HALL.SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617) 764-0660 'Pecumc�'� February 20, 1985 Planning Board City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Planning Board Members: Pertaining to a proposed zoning change creating Business Park Zones in the City, the following general comments will hopefully offer you some insight on the effects on property taxes such a change is likely to have in the affected areas. I have divided these intto two groups, unde- veloped parcels and currently developed parcels. Any change which will enhance the marketability and development potential of unutilized or underutilized parcels will likely result in increasing valuations of those parcels, as well as a more rapid expansion of the City's tax base as development occurs. As far as currently developed parcels are concerned, the effect on value will be dependent on a number of factors. Will the existing use conform to the new zoning? Are the existing improvements and buildings readily convertible to a conforming use? In general, if the existing use is com- patible or conforming to the new development, valuations will likely appreciate. Otherwise, valuations may remain stable or possibly depre- ciate. Unfortunately, due to time constraints and the uncertainty of changes resulting from the impending revaluation, it is impossible to be more specific at this time. Very truly your Peter M. Caron Assessor PMC:mjg t /} kms,. Gita of ccTItni c C` z fiY`Y - /?� .y �lc`[YiY[Tlt� �IIZIT?T (ane cttlrm Green April 23, 1985 City of Salem City Council City Hall Salem, MA. 01970 Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council: Enclosed for your consideration are two proposed changes to the Salem Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map regarding Site Plan Review and Business Park Development. These two changes were approved by the Council on March 14, 1985, following a Joint Public Hearing of the City Council and the Planning Board held on February 20, 1985. Because of . technical questions which have been raised regarding the Joint Public Hearing and legislative process, the Planning Board feels that this process should be completed again. The Planning Board is herewith requesting that a new Joint Public Hearing be scheduled at the Council ' s earliest convenience. The Planning Board is hopeful that a new hearing can be scheduled as soon as possible and thanks the Council for their consideration in this matter. Sincer el y yours, Walter B. Power, Chairman 1J dey {I CITY OF SALEM In the year one-thousand nine hundred and Eighty-five. An Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Salem, that the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem, adopted on August 27, 1965, as heretofore amended, be further amended as follows: Add to Section VII, Supplementary Regulations, the following: R. Site Plan Review 1. Purpose: For the purposes of protecting and promoting the health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City, promoting acceptable site planning practices and standards within the City of Salem and ensuring compliance with the City of Salem Master Plan and good zoning practices, notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance to the contrary, no structure or premises exceeding 10,000 square feet in non-residential gross building area, or containing six (6) or more residential dwelling units shall be constructed, reconstructed, enlarged, altered, or used except in accordance with a site plan submitted to and approved by the Planning Board in accordance with the request of this Paragraph. 2. Any application for approval of a Site Plan Review under this section shall be accompanied by five copies of a site plan which shall be at a scale to be established by the Planning Board, and, according to the size of the development, shall include five copies of all information required for a "Definitive Plan" under Section III B of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem and such petiton shall also be accompanied by five copies of an . Environmental Impact Statement as set out in Appendix A of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem, as requested. The plan shall contain the following information: -2- a) Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction; b) Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas, walkways, and driveways; c) Locations and dimensions of internal roadways and accessways to adjacent public roadways; d) Location and type of external lighting; e) Location, type, dimensions and quantities of landscaping and screening; f) Location and dimensions of utilities, gas, telephone, electrical, communications, water, drainage, sewer, and other waste disposal; g) Location of snow storage areas; h) Location of all existing natural features, including ponds, brooks, streams, and wetlands; i) Topography of the site, with two-foot contours; j) Conceptual drawing of buildings to be erected, including elevations showing architectural styles. Such site plan shall also be accompanied by a brief narrative, as requested by the Planning Board, addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: a) buildings; b) parking and loading; c) traffic flow and circulation; d) external lighting; e) landscaping and screening; f) utilities; g) snow removal; h) natural area protection and enhaAcement, and i) compatibility of the architecture of proposed development with existing architecture of the surrounding area. -3- The Planning Board shall review such submitted information in accordance with accepted site planning standards and attempt to promote such standards and make certain that the development, if approved, takes place in-a manner which shall in all aspects be an asset to the City. The Planning Board shall request changes in such plans and information submitted to promote the quality of the development and its impact upon the health, convenience and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City. The Planning Board shall review and amend all such submitted plans in accordance with the following criteria: a) adequacy of parking facilities and number of parking spaces proposed for each development; b) adequacy of loading facilities; c) adequacy of traffic circulation system; d) adequacy of access points and routes to and from the land parcel to adjoining streets and ways; e) adequacy of type and amount of external lighting to be provided on the parcel; f) adequacy of type, quality, and quantity of landscaping to promote an aesthetically pleasing environment and to properly screen the development from adjacent land uses; g) adequacy of type, quality, and quantity of vegetative screening to protect adjacent and nearby land parcels from structures not aesthetically pleasing or wholly compatible with such parcels; h) adequacy of the methods of disposal of sewage, refuse, and other waste; -4- j) adequacy of the method of surface drainage across and from the site; j) adequacy,of method of water distribution to and from the parcel and its structures; Q adequacy of pedestrian circulation systems to and from parking areas and structures; 1) adequacy of protection or enhancement of natural areas; m) compatibility of architecture of structures with architecture of surrounding or nearby buildings. 3. The Planning Board shall, within seven (7) days after receipt of said application, transmit one copy of said application and plan to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendations to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall not take final action on such plan until it has received a report therein from the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health, and Conservation Commission or until thirty-five (35) days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report. Notice of the filing of the application shall be given to the City Clerk, Fire Department, Police Department, Superintendent of Streets and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning Board and a public hearing shall be held within sixty-five (65) days after filing of an application in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. t -5- 4. Failure of the Planning Board to take final action upon an application within ninety (90) days following the date of the public hearing shall be deemed to be a grant of the approval applied for. 5. After a notice and public hearing as set forth above, the Planning Board, by a two-thirds vote, may approve the plan provided that: a. the proposed development shall properly screen itself, its buildings, structures, and other construction with vegetative landscaping, earth berms, fencing, or other appropriate screening as determined by the Planning Board. b. To protect the quality of the surrounding area and environment, if such surrounding area is residential in nature, is land reserved for conservation use, or is land which the Board determines to be appropriate for such a requirement, a buffer zone shall exist along the property line within which no construction or destruction of land shall take place. The size of such zone shall be determined by the Planning Board according to the size of the proposed development, the land uses of the surrounding area, the aesthetic aspects of the proposed development, and all impacts of the proposed development upon such surrounding areas which can be alleviated through such a buffer zone. c. In specific instances where the Planning Board deems such to be appropriate, it shall assess the compatibility of the architecture of a proposed development with the architecture of surrounding structures and land uses, and may request alterations to the architecture of such proposed development to ensure compatibility. -6- d. The Planning Board may, in appropriate cases as it determines, impose further restrictions upon the development or parts thereof as a condition to granting the approval and may waive any defined restrictions. 6. In exercising its jurisdiction, the Planning Board shall conform to all requirements of procedure applicable under the Massachusetts General Laws, 'Chapter 40A, as amended, and the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 7. Any approval granted hereunder shall lapse within two (2) years if substantial construction thereof has not commenced by such date except for good cause. 4 CITY OF SALEM In the year one-thousand nine hundred and Eighty-five. An Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Salem, that the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem, adopted on August 27, 1965, as heretofore amended, be further amended as follows: Section One: Add to Section III A, Types of Districts below B-5 District, the following: Business Park Development District--which is intended to be those areas within which clean business and industry is developed. Section Two: Add to Section V A, Permitted Uses below I--Districts--Industrial, the following: 10. Business Park Development Districts: a. General office buildings including business and professional offices and ancillary activities (i. e. cafeteria facilities). b. General storage, warehousing and wholesale distribution uses. c. Manufacturing, packaging, assembly, reconditioning, processing, research and testing of the following types of industries: pharmaceuticals and other related products, food and kindred products, apparel, electronics and electrical products, furniture and fixtures, primary and fabricated metal products, box manufacturing, textile manufacturing, frozen food storage, ice manufacturing, including the storage of new materials and containers used in or incidental to any of the foregoing. Provided that such operations: k. 1. are not specifically prohibited from the City of Salem, according to the schedule of prohibited uses in Section V-B, subsection 9 c. -2- 2. are not dangerous by reason of hazard from fire or explosion. 3. are not offensives detrimental, injurious, noxious, or hazardous by reason of causing dust, smoke, odor, fumes, radiation, ground water discharge, noise, vibration, traffic congestion, or other nuisance. 4. are compatible with adjacent non-industrial uses. d. Laboratories or research facilities, including medical and other research, provided manufacturing is clearly incidental to the operation of the facility, does not exceed fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area of the building and is not offensive, injurious, noxious, detrimental, or hazardous by reason of dust, smoke, odor, fumes, noise, radiation, ground water discharge, traffic congestion or other nuisances. e. Assembly or packaging of articles not exceeding two hundred (200) pounds in weight, provided that no manufacturing or processing is carried. f. Food and beverage manufacturing, bottling or processing or commissary. Section Three: Add,to Section VI, Density Regulations after C. Central Development District Uses, the following: D. Business Park Development District A building erected herafter for uses permitted in the Business Park Development District shall meet the requirements set forth in Table IV. In interpreting Table IV, the same provisions as apply for interpreting Table I, shall apply. Section Four: Add to Section VI, Density Regulations, after Table III, the following: Table IV Business Park Development District Minimum Lot Area 40,000 Minimum Lot Width 150 Maximum Lot Coverage 45% Minimum Depth of Front Yard 50 Minimum Width of Side Yard 30 Minimum Depth of Rear Yard 50 Maximum Height of Buildings 50 Maximum Height of Fences 10 Buffer Area Required 75' from any residential or conservation use Open Space Required 10% Parking Required Subject to Planning Board approval. Section Five: Add to Section VII, Supplementary Regulations, after P, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts, the following: Q. Business Park Development District 1. Purpose: The Business Park Development District is designed to provide encouragement for the development of land uses which will further the objectives of: a) the creation of business and industry within the City, b) enhancement of the City's employment base; and c) enhancement of the City's tax and revenue base. It is also the intent of this section to ensure compliance with,the Master Plan and acceptable zoning practices. -4- 2. Special Permit: a. No development in excess of lo,000 square feet of gross building area shall be allowed within the Business Park Development Zoning District without a Business Park Development Special Permit from the Planning Board. b. Any petition filed for a Business Park Development under this section shall be accompanied by five copies of a site plan which shall be at a scale to be established by the Planning Board and shall include five copies of all information required for a "Definitive Plan" under Section III B of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem and such petition shall also be accompanied by five copies of an Environmental Impact Statement as set out in Appendix A of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem. The site plan shall also contain the following information: 1. Location and dimensions of all building and other construction; 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas, walkways, and driveways; 3. Location and dimensions of internal roadways and accessways to adjacent public roadways; 4. Location and type of external lighting; 5. Location, type, dimensions, and quantities of landscaping and screening; 6. Locations and dimensions of utilities, including water, surface drainage, sewer, and other waste disposal; 7. Location of snow storage areas; 8. Location of existing natural features, including ponds, bridges, streams, and wetlands. 9. Topography of the land at two-foot contours. -5- Such site plan shall also be accompanied by a brief narrative, as requested by the Planning Board, addressing these concerns in the following defined categories: a) buildings; b) parking and loading; c) traffic flow and circulation; d) external lighting; e) landscaping and screening; f) utilities; g) snow removal. The Planning Board shall review such submitted information in accordance with accepted site planning standards and attempt to promote such standards and make certain that the development, if approved, takes place in a manner which will in all aspects be an asset to the City. The Planning Board shall request changes in such plans and information submitted to promote the quality of the development and its impact upon the health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City. c. The Planning Board shall, with seven (7) days after receipt of said application, transmit one copy of said application and plan to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health, and Conservation Commission, who may, at their discretion, investigate the application and. report in writing their recommendations to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall not take final action on such plan until it has received a report thereon from the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health, and Conservation Commission or until thirty-five (35) days have elapsed after distribution of such application withdut submission of a report. Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Fire Department, Police Department, Superintendent of Streets and School Department, and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning Board and a public hearing shall be held within sixty-five (65) days after filing of an application in accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A. -6- d. Failure of the Planning Board to take final action upon an application within ninety (90) days following the date of the public hearing shall be deemed to be a grant of the permit applied for. e. After a notice and public hearing as set forth above, the Planning Board by a two-thirds vote, may grant such a special permit provided that: 1. If the surrounding area is residential in nature or is land reserved for conservation use, or is land which the Board determines to be appropriate for such a requirement, a 75' buffer zone shall be provided on the parcel being proposed for . development within which no construction or disturbance of land, excepting approved landscaping or screening, shall take place. 2. To enhance the quality of the development and to maintain adequate open space, 10% of all land area must be maintained as open space. No construction of any kind shall take place in such area. 3. Parking and loading requirements: Parking and loading requirements shall be met as defined in Section VII C and D of this Ordinance or as required by the Planning Board. 4. Screening and Landscaping: The proposed development shall properly screen all buildings, structures, and other construction with vegetative landscaping, earth berms, fencing, or other appropriate screening as determined by the Planning Board. 5. Waivers and Further Conditions: The Planning Board may, in appropriate cases as it determines, impose further restrictions upon the Business Park Development or parts thereof as a condition to granting the Special Permit, and may waive any defined restrictions and requirements as deemed inappropriate by the Planning Board. -7- 6 Complementary and Ancillary Uses: In addition to the uses set out as permitted uses in-the Business Park Development District in Section V-A, the development of other uses shall also be allowed, at the discretion of the Planning Board if the Board determines that such use will complement existing and proposed uses, and act as an acceptable ancillary use. Such other uses to be considered are as follows: a) restaurant and other eating establishments; and b) hotels, motels and other lodging establishments. 7. Adherence to Chapter 40 A: In exercising its jurisdiction, the Planning Board shall conform to all requirements of procedure applicable under the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, as amended, and the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 8. Two-Year Lapse: Any Special Permit granted hereunder shall lapse within two (2) years if substantial construction thereof has not commenced by such date except for good cause. AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING MAP, CITY OF SALEM, February, 1985 The original copy of the Zoning Map, dated, August 27, 1965, as amended, now in the City Clerk' s files, shall be amended further by establishing the following new zones bounded and described below: Beginning at the NORTHEASTERLY corner of. the herein described parcel at the point on the NORTHWESTERLY sideline of Highland Avenue, said point lying 4341 , more or less, SOUTHWESTERLY from Ravenna Avenue, thence bounded; SOUTHEASTERLY, by said Highland Avenue, 13331 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by land of the City of Salem, 381 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, by said land of the City of Salem, 321 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by land of City of Salem, 7201 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, by land of City of Salem, 350' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by land of City of Salem 3951 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by land of City of Salem, 1351 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by land of City of Salem, on two courses, 240' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by land of City of Salem, 751 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 981 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 1401 , mote or less , to the NORTHWESTERLY sideline of said Highland Avenue, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, by said Highland Avenue, 600' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the City line forming the boundary of the City of Salem and the City of Lynn, 1500' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on 2 courses, 2550' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 11051 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 1351 , more or less , thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 2451 , more or less to the point of beginning; Intending to describe Lots 1, 4, 5, a portion of 6, Salem Assessors Map 3. Beginning at the NORTHERLY corner, of the herein described parcel, at the SOUTHWESTERLY intersection of Highland Avenue and Swampscott Road, thence bounded; NORTHEASTERLY, by the SOUTHWESTERLY sideline of Swampscott Road, 35001 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, in . several courses, 11751 , more or less, thence; SOUTHERLY, 5151 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 601 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, in several courses, 11651 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, in several courses, 7351 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 1420' , more or less, to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of Highland Avenue, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Highland Avenue, 150' , more or less, thence; . NORTHEASTERLY, 360' more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, crossing Cedar Road, 1901 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of said Cedar Road, 1101 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 1751 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2201 , more or less , to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of said Highland AVenue, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Highland Avenue, 11601 , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe Lot 13, Salem Assessors Map 6 and Lots 42, 44, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 , 53, 54, 55, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 145, 146, 72, and 73 , Salem Assessors Map 7 . AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING MAP, CITY OF SALEM, February, 1985 The original copy of the Zoning Map, dated August 27, 1965, as amended, now in the City Clerk' s files, shall be amended further by establishing the following new zones bounded and described below: Beginning at the NORTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, on the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of Bridge Street, thence bounded; NORTHEASTERLY, 225' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY 7751 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by Boston Street, 2801 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY and NORTHWESTERLY by a curve forming the intersection of Boston and Bridge Streets, 471 , more or less , thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by several courses on said Bridge Street, 9081 , more or less to the point of beginning. Intending to describe the entirety of Lot 74, as shown on Salem Assessors Map 25. Beginning at the NORTHWESTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, at the point on the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of Boston Street, said point lying 851 , more or less SOUTHEASTERLY of Grove Street , thence bounded; NORTHWESTERLY, 1201 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 401 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 601 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by several courses, on Goodhue Street, 7291 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY and SOUTHEASTERLY, by a curve forming the intersection of Goodhue Street and Bridge Street, 321 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, on several courses by said Boston Street, 6171 , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe the entirety of Lots 297, 298, and 299 on Salem Assessors Map 16.' Beginning at the SOUTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel on the WESTERLY sideline of Grove Street, thence bounded; SOUTHWESTERLY, 75' , more or less., thence; More SOUTHWESTERLY, 5' , more or less, thence; Less SOUTHWESTERLY, 181 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 81 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 71 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 111 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 51 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 501 ; more or less, to the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of Beaver Street , thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Beaver Street, 45' , more or less , thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 52 ' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 70' more or less, thence; More SOUTHWESTERLY, 331 , more or less, thence; Less SOUTHWESTERLY, 361 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 791 , more or less, to the sideline of said Beaver Street , thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Beaver Stret, 651 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 801 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 801 , moe or less, thence' SOUTHEASTERLY, 801 , more of less, to the sideline of said Beaver Street, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by said Beaver Street, 401 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 801 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 1161 , more or less , thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by a way, 231 , more of less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 3121 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on 2 courses, 1051 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by said Beaver Street, 201 , more or•less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on 2 courses, 1521 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2851 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 851 , to the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad, thence; Continuing on the same course, 45' , more or less, crossing said Boston and Maine Railroad, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 1501 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 501 , more or less, to the SOUTHERLY sideline of Harmony Grove Road, thence; NORTHWESTERLY and NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said Harmony Grove Road, 6551 , more or less, to Grove Street, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, EASTERLY, and SOUTHEASTERLY, by said Grove Street, 6551 , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe Lots 221, 236, 237, 238, 239, 377, and a portion of the Boston and Maine Railroad, as shown on Salem Assessors Map .16. Beginning at the NORTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, at the NORTHWESTERLY intersection of Flint Street and Bridge Street , thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, on several courses, by the sideline of said Bridge Street, 9701 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Bridge Street, 81 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said Bridge Street, 2401 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY and :SOUTHWESTERLY, by a curve forming the intersection of Bridge Street and Goodhue Street, 551 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, on several courses, by Goodhue Street and Grove Street, 11451 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 651 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 51 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 1641 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 51 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 551 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 241 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, in 2 courses, 1451 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 251 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 1651 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 321 , more or less, to the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad, 651 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 81 ,more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad and by the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of Oak Street, 7101 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY by the SOUTHWESTERLY sideline of Flint Street, 170' , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe Lot 1 as shown on Salem Assessors Map 25 and Lots 300, 301, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372 on Salem Assessors Map 16. Beginning at the SOUTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of Bridge Street, 2,0651 , more or less, to the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of Flint Street, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, on several courses by the sideline of said Flint Street, 3701 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 901 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2251 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 581 , more or less, thence NORTHEASTERLY, 201 , more or less , thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 601 , more or less , thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on 3 courses, 1101 , more or less , to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline .of Mason Street, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Mason Street, 1361 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 721 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 921 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 70' , more or less, to the sideline of said Mason Street, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by said Mason Street, 381 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 701 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 781 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 691 , more or less, to the sideline 'of said Mason Street, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Mason StreeF, 5781 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 871 , more or less , thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 30' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 25' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 102' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 118' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 781 , more or. less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2481 , more or less, to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of said Mason Street, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by said Mason Street, 185' , moreor less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 80' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY; 121 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 1281 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on several courses, 3181 , more or less to the SOUTHWESTERLY sideline of Buffum Street Extension, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by said Buffum Street, Extension, 201 , more .or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, in street, by S. Mason Street, 388' , more or less, to the SOUTH-WESTERLY sideline of North Street, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said North Street, 5501 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said North Street, 80' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said North Street, 901 , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe, lots 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, a portion of 40, lots 642, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57 , 58, 59, 60, 73, 82, 83, 87, 89, 90, 91, 97, and 640 on Salem Assessors Map, 25. flitu IIf cTIESIi, �4Fassc'It4mdt5 lir One "-�:ttlem (6reFtt MINUTES OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO SITE PLAN REVIEW AND BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT ZONE A joint public hearing was held between the Salem City Council and the Salem Planning Board on February 20, 1985. City Councillors present: Councillors Nutting, Grace, Swiniuch, McCabe, Centorino, O'Leary, Rochna. Planning Board members present : Walter Power, Robert Guethlen, Normand Houle, Edward Stevenson, Kenneth May, John Ahern, Abby Burns, and Donald Hunt. Also present: City Planner Gerard Kavanaugh Council President John Nutting called the hearing to order at 8:45 p.m. and read the notice of the public hearing. Councillor Nutting then introduced the members of the City Council present and then introduced Mr. .Walter Power, Chairman of the Planning Board. Mr. Power introduced the Planning Board members present and gave a brief overview of the proposals before the public this evening. He noted the li purpose of the Site Plan Review process is to strengthen the review process the Planning Board exhibits over certain projects which may otherwise be developed with no Planning Board or community input. The proposed Business Park Development zones are in harmony with the recommendations set forth in the Master Plan--to provide space within the City for businesses to grow, while maintaining a control over the development. Mr. Power noted that these proposals would answer, two needs: 1) to avoid rapid development and allow for slow, long—range development of a parcel; and 2) to create jobs in the community so people can live and work here. Mr. Power then introduced City Planner Kavanaugh to discuss the Site Plan Review proposal before the Council . Mr. Kavanaugh noted that over the past six to eight months, there has been an increasing concern expressed by Planning Board members and members of the City Council regarding growth and development which has taken place recently in the City. As a result, the Planning Board began to research ways to better monitor and control the types of development which take place so that short term and long term impacts ,for good input from all appropriate bodies could be solicited. Therefore, the Planning Board is proposing an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would require review of all non—residential development in excess of 10,000 square feet or in excess of six residential units. Presently, there are certain cases where there is no public review process or neighborhood meetings. Mr. Kavanaugh suggested that a Site -z- Plan Review process through the Planning Board with public hearing requirements and thorough review by the Board and Planning Department would allow for a thorough analysis of traffic, water, sewer, drainage, site design, landscaping, impact on wetlands, etc. The requirements would be stringent and would allow the Planning Board to take a good long look at what is proposed. Mr. Kavanaugh noted that the entire Zoning Ordinance is currently being evaluated, but the Planning Board feels strongly •that this type of review is important to enact right away to avoid the possibility of no review of proposed projects by the SII Planning Board. Councillor Centorino stated he has no problems with the proposal. He feels the proposal is long overdue. Councillor Nutting asked if this legislation was styled after any other community and Mr. Kavanaugh replied it was styled after legislation in a community where he previously worked. It allows for cooperative efforts between the Planning Board and the Planning Department. Councillor Nutting asked if Mr. Zieff ' s project on Loring Hills Avenue would be affaecte and Mr. Kavanaugh replied in the affirmative and added that this will allow the Planning Board to properly review the implications of traffic, conservation, site design, water, sewer, drainage, and impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Gary Moore of 13 Sylvan Street wished to be recorded as in favor of the proposal. He stated he was speaking as a resident and member of the Redevelopment Authority and felt this was a positive way to deal with the "rush" of development and was a positive step on the City' s part as opposed to a building moratorium. Attorney George Vallis asked what the difference between this proposal and a Planned Unit Development and Mr. Kavanaugh replied that many projects do not fall under the auspices of a Planned Unit Development. For Example, an eight unit development on Procter Street and a sixty unit residential development on Derby Street both would presently be subject to no review by the Planning Board. Councillor Goerge McCabe spoke in support of the proposal. He felt it was essential for neighborhood input. He commended the Planning Board and City Planner for their efforts. Councillor Richard Swiniuch asked what would happen to existing proposals and Mr. Kavanaugh replied they would become non—conforming uses. Attorney George Vallis feels this proposal would water down the jurisdiction of the Board of Appeal and give more power to the Planning Board. Mr. Kavanaugh replied that this proposed legislation has nothing to do with variances granted by the Board of Appeal. Further there is specific criteria within.which the Planning Board deals with proposals. J —3- Walter Power stated the Planning Board will review the comments submitted this evening and will return their recommendations to the Council as quickly as possible. The Board feels this legislation is sorely needed. Regarding the Business Park Development Zone proposal , Chairman Walter Power stated the legislation is similar to Site Plan Review within two specific areas of the City--Commercial Street/Mason Street area and the Highland Avenue/Swampscott Road area. Any development within these two areas will require the same type of public review procedure as set forth in Site Plan Review. It was noted that the land areas to be included in this new zone are presently zoned Industrial for the most part. Some Business and Residential zones are also included. Presently, if a developer meets the existing zoning, there is no processfor review or mechanism for neighborhood input. This legislation would allow for a review process leading to a Special Permit for Business Park Development and would allow for more stringent review than presently exists in the Industrial zone and more limited uses than presently exist. The Planning Board feels this legislation would enhance the employment and tax bases and provide clean industry which would have minimal impact j on the surrounding neighborhood. City Planner Kavanaugh pointed out the parcels to be included in the Commercial/Mason Street area. The area includes approximately 38z acres and is currently zoned Industrial. The Special Permit process would provide for public input and allow the Planning Board to make certain that whatever development takes place is for the good of the neighborhood and the City. Traffic, water, sewerage, drainage, and other environmental issues will all be taken into consideration. Regarding Highland Avenue/Swampscott Road, 178 acres are proposed to be included in the new zone. What is proposed is the same type of Business Park Development District. Presently, the majority of the land to be included in the new zone is undeveloped. Mr. Kavanaugh added "that there is a provision for a 75' buffer zone between the new development and any surrounding neighborhoods, substantial screening and landscaping, 10% open space, and 55% of the property to remain undeveloped. Councillor Swiniuch asked why the proposed zone line is "zig—zagged?" Mr. Kavanaugh replied that the Board tried to make certain that the present residential areas were not included in the new zone. Councillor Nutting asked why these two particular areas were considered over other areas of the City; i.e. Canal Street and Mr. Kavanaugh noted that they evaluation was made based upon the potential for growth and development in different areas. He added the entire Ordinance and Map is presently under review. 4— Councillor Centorino raised the issue of allowed uses--he felt some of the proposed allowed uses were of a broader range than he would have thought. Mr. Kavanaugh felt this could be addressed. The Board wanted tomakecertain that what would be allowed would be clean business which would eliminate some of the existing market. They did include several controls on any proposed use. Walter Power added that the Board' s intent was to make the proposal broad enough to allow businesses which are presently in Salem a place to grow. Regarding Mason/Commercial Street, Councillor Centorino asked if the area was presently zoned entirely Industrial and Mr. Kavanaugh replied in the affirmative. Regarding Highland Avenue and Swampscott Road, however, even though the majority of the land is zoned Industrial , there is some R-3, R—C, and B-2. Councillor Centorino felt that in some ways development could be facillitated with the new zone in this area. Mr Kavanaugh respectfully disagreed, noting that the SPecial Permit process by nature makes development more restrictive. Mr. Kavanaugh pointed out the existing zones on the Stasinos property and Kenneth May of the . Planning Board added that the Board had been concerned that a potential "strip" type of commercial development could be constructed in the B-2 areas of that property which could have a detrimental impact on the downtown. Councillor Centorino agreed that commercial use could have a detrimental impact on the downtown area. However, he would look more favorably towards the Mason/Commercial area than Highland Avenue-and Swampscott Road area. Walter Power suggested that a wider buffer between the Sophia/Ravenna Ave. neighborhood and the proposed zone be incorporated and -extra care as to the type of business which is housed in the zone be instituted. He added that the land as it stands now will be lost but with the new zone being instituted, the process of developing can be long term and allow for good planning. Councillor Swiniuch stated he felt the proposal was an excellent idean. He commended the Board and the City Planner for their efforts. Councillor George McCabe and Councillor Leonard O'Leary echoed the support of Councillor Swiniuch. Attorney George Vallis asked if a study was done as to the highest and best use of the property. He raised the issue of access to the parcels. Walter Power noted that the Planning Board felt that setting aside land would provide intrinsic value that accrues to the City. Businesses could locate or expand and jobs would be created. Then the value grows. There is a severe problem with the lack of a connector road. What is planned will not generate high traffic. -5— Mr. Vallis asked what the impact upon City services would be and Mr. Kavanaugh noted that the present zoning would have a greater impact. What is proposed would be more restrictive. Mr. Vallis stated traffic would be "horrendous." Mr. .Power noted that the Planning Board wished less curb cuts on Highland Avenue to minimize the traffic impacts. The Board would anticipate one entrance to the whole complex, therefore minimizing the need for extra curb cuts. There being no further input or comments, the public hearing was declared closed at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Dale E. Yale OT��.Co o� �i of -�Jaltm, t4Vas5ar4 tse##s y , 9 'One J 2We tt Gran February 25, 1985 City of Salem City Council City Hall Salem, MA. 01970 Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council: Following the joint public hearing held with the City Council on Wednesday, February 20, 1985, the Planning Board met to consider the ma=ter of the Business Park Zone proposal. Based upon the findings of the public hearing, the Planning Board vo=ed to recommend the following changes to the proposal: 1 . Boot and shoe manufacturing, printing, binding, publishing, steam la=undry, dry cleaning and rug cleaning uses have been eliminated from the proposed Permitted Uses for the new zone, thereby further • restricting the allowed uses within the zone. 2. An additional 300' buffer zone has been added to the area between the proposed zone and the residential neighborhoods of Pyburn, Ravenna, and Madeline Avenues. This in effect removes 6.2 AC from Lot 6, Map 3 and 1.7 AC. from Lot 7, Map 3, and, it is hoped, will alleviate the ccncerns expressed by several councillors regarding the inclusion of that parcel into the new zone. The amended proposal is attached for your review, together with a list of the parcels to be included in the new zone and a legal description of the land area involved. Once again, may I express the Planning Board' s appreciation for your input and cooperation. We believe that enacting this proposed legislation will provide for tighter controls on development and allow for greater neighborhood and community input into any proposed de-✓elopment. We look forward to timely action on this proposed re.,ision. Sincerely yours, Walter B. Power, III d \ . Chairman v do— En^losure AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING MAP, CITY OF SALEM, February, 1985 The original copy of the Zoning Map, dated August 27, 1965, as amended, now in the City Clerk' s files, shall be amended further by establishing the following new zones bounded and described below: Beginning at the NORTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, on the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of Bridge Street, thence bounded; NORTHEASTERLY, 2251 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY 775' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by Boston Street, 280' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY and NORTHWESTERLY by a curve forming the intersection of Boston and Bridge Streets, 47' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by several courses on said Bridge Street, 908' , more or less to the point of beginning. Intending to describe the entirety of Lot 74, as shown on Salem Assessors Map 25. Beginning at the NORTHWESTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, at the point on the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of Boston Street, said point lying 85' , more or less SOUTHEASTERLY of Grove Street, thence bounded; NORTHWESTERLY, 1201 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 401 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 601 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by several courses, on Goodhue Street, 7291 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY and SOUTHEASTERLY, by a curve forming the intersection of Goodhue Street and Bridge Street, 32' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, on several courses by said Boston Street, 617' , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe the entirety of Lots 297, 298, and 299 on Salem Assessors Map 16. Beginning at the SOUTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel on the WESTERLY sideline of Grove Street, thence bounded; SOUTHWESTERLY, 751 , more or less, thence; More SOUTHWESTERLY, 51 , more or less, thence; Less SOUTHWESTERLY, 18' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 81 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 71 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 11 ' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 51 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 501 , more or less, to the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of Beaver Street, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Beaver Street, 451 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 52' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 70' more or less, thence; More SOUTHWESTERLY, 33' , more or less, thence; Less SOUTHWESTERLY, 36' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 791 , more or less, to the sideline of said Beaver Street, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Beaver Stret, 651 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 80' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 80' , moe or less, thence' SOUTHEASTERLY, 801 , more or less, to the sideline of said Beaver Street, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by said Beaver Street, 401 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 801 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 1161 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by a way, 231 , more or less, thence; j SOUTHWESTERLY, 3121 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on 2 courses, 105' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by said Beaver Street, 20' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on 2 courses, 1521 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2851 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 85' , to the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad, thence; - Continuing on the same course, 451 , more or less, crossing said Boston and Maine Railroad, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 150' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 50' , more or less, to the SOUTHERLY sideline of Harmony Grove Road, thence; NORTHWESTERLY and NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said Harmony Grove Road, 6551 , more or less, to Grove Street, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, EASTERLY, and SOUTHEASTERLY, by said Grove Street, 655' , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe Lots 221, 236, 237, 238, 239, 377, and a portion of the Boston and Maine Railroad, as shown on Salem Assessors Map 16. Beginning at the NORTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, at the NORTHWESTERLY intersection of Flint Street and Bridge Street, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, on several courses, by the sideline of said Bridge Street, 9701 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Bridge Street, 8' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said Bridge Street, 2401 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY and SOUTHWESTERLY, by a curve forming the intersection of Bridge Street and Goodhue Street, 55' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, on several courses, by Goodhue Street and Grove Street, 11451 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 651 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 51 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 164' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 51 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 551 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 24' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, in 2 courses, 1451 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 251 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 165' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 32' , more or less, to the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad, 651 , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 8' ,more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of the Boston and Maine Railroad and by the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of Oak Street, 7101 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY by the SOUTHWESTERLY sideline of Flint Street, 1701 , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe Lot 1 as shown on Salem Assessors Map 25 and Lots 300, 301, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372 on Salem Assessors Map 16. Beginning at the SOUTHEASTERLY corner of the herein described parcel, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of Bridge Street, 2,0651 , more or less, to the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of Flint Street, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, on several courses by the sideline of said Flint Street, 370' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 90' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2251 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 58' , more or less, thence NORTHEASTERLY, 201 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 601 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on 3 courses, 110' , more or less, to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of Mason Street, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Mason Street, 1361 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 72' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 921 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 701 , more or less, to the sideline of said Mason Street, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by said Mason Street, 38' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 701 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 781 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 691 , more or less, to the sideline of said Mason Street, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Mason Street, 578' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 871 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 301 , more or less, thence; - NORTHEASTERLY, 251 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 1021 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 1181 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 78' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2481 , more or less, to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of said Mason Street, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by said Mason Street, 1851 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 80' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 121 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 1281 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, on several courses, 318' , more or less to the SOUTHWESTERLY sideline of Buffum Street Extension, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by said Buffum Street, Extension, 20' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, in street, by S. Mason Street, 3881 , more or less, to the SOUTHWESTERLY sideline of North Street, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said North Street, 5501 , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said North Street, 801 , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, by the sideline of said North Street, 901 , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe, lots 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, a portion of 40, lots 642, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59, 60, 73, 82, 83, 87, 89, 90, 91, 97, and 640 on Salem Assessors Map, 25. Beginning at the NORTHERLY corner of the herein described parcel, at the SOUTHWESTERLY intersection of Highland Avenue and Swampscott Road, thence bounded; NORTHEASTERLY, by the SOUTHWESTERLY sideline of Swampscott. Road, 3500' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, in several courses, 1175' , more or less, thence; SOUTHERLY, 515' , more or less, thence; SOUTHEASTERLY, 60' , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, in several courses, 11651 , more or less, thence; , NORTHWESTERLY, in several courses, 7351 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 14201 , more or less, to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of Highland Avenue, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Highland Avenue, 150' , more or less, thence; NORTHEASTERLY, 360' more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, crossing Cedar Road, 1901 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, by the NORTHEASTERLY sideline of said Cedar Road, 110' , more or less, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, 1751 , more or less, thence; SOUTHWESTERLY, 2201 , more or less, to the SOUTHEASTERLY sideline of said Highland AVenue, thence; NORTHWESTERLY, by the sideline of said Highland Avenue, 1160' , more or less, to the point of beginning. Intending to describe Lot 13, Salem Assessors Map 6 and Lots 42, 44, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 145, 146, 72, and 73, Salem Assessors Map 7. RE: Highland Avenue Business Park Development ' DATE: March 14, 1985 With the exclusion of 392 Highland Ave. (Lot 7 on Salem Assessors' Map 3) from the proposed Business Park Development zone, the following would be accomplished: 1. 3.4 acres of land would be eliminated from the new zone. 2. 300' of frontage on Highland Avenue would be eliminated from the new zone. 3. A buffer from the existing residential neighborhood would be established in light of the fact that the present use of the parcel is residential. s I 1 'Phona xop Sr.'P4v..e� I .q, Gallows Hill _veypa 4 r , PP b/ Pi• o r w root o `a 1 l ou 3 II'IRhle�Cer a pkwy 'Sdem 1 'l '\ ndee d- ;-C--ll f C'°xy �' °a e^'o11 n,A f a oe S aOR°\ \ 1 l lijila Ibodi 5l' ' J 1 P nd �� f' .� St M;S/ 9 hootu / v, N' 1 y8 \ 7Ie1RhM O�r- a°�6 \ \°4°r 0trtv5l s° Pond / I /- �_-vsunon Cp ' .;. / b,.d. Park $r I .Satm'_5\eslQRd'� �Cq:•\ c° \�\. _� ,:I (lt _ '9fBD sr_- _ Cad sCHias`i1 A°Opts earbpr/F,-'erod bi(,f-5 defy aa�cflubllc Eder.�ISf Y If �.., ,\ \S'dne�Y°C f .y o o{f 1 �.,�x -A o�- a`j \ ... _ Ey'e \ -./ Wrara 'm1 �A - o� WorMe p((rr \PomI.'•c Nd \ .'• 1 o 'Pe / - olasnieme 6 (� rag. mastaonnrre: yf, \ / $ l ax a/ a. S ,j' n, /� �% a �iei/ oxy, \ app/l./ tXf � J 1 \J` hi r @ �. P P �o e \ a ur a} °� 6r ;moi t of De 1� S ,y IIiRh r gl 1 .., P H G 9� \ � O lP North 'Wya cholol v Gaian@r. ee 11 \s'° If hCr aft f 0 C hts\ z Np" ah.. <a n ? N1. '` LF-' ( (�) Child .o ;eednm /S I' - �{ancoiC �Pleypround <� - rrRo y Miff Iiosvild �prt . of N Sr�A�O ,t .ah°u hne . c, Pond 1 floY^ 9 O °ni Vicat. CQ / i I �` 1 1 1� S adPm 5 vr4kQAv d/...." °7 G. m �� / z OIJth s 1 S.' t 41,Xa Ild �•^ S pp 0- 9 oB >✓�7_ sale, _-4^ eGo14 sale, biA��e eq .`.4 \�01°o ISePa <� o� x iy�_..�. J l ur 1 fpri / >v 0:�4 2` `` o' - / cPfa° ' AAL M a. Mco u @ I -1 Msi 1\o \' '\� ,v\ wrVp>l I I d@a Meado, 1 (a ... TT " eV 1I PPll �. 9y�,'.: i �Ciesn t 1 1 Peabod > -r 9 s °� _ �LA°.e�y on -- t y 6 a In9510a a .-� t ©�u�.1 ° °9 C 1� °'.1 Forest CJReservmr.I' 6r, q 4 �ry Kt—' rorrM, 1 0; 219'^ fib! __-. - .. \ - P r P�'. y\ Jlam �al RRZ <t J II a V at \ f y r ad Ir�aw".' yt raa .n Highsehool 81+v'n�._ "s�Pri rV. o'z-. < nu:el4 J 5 Sll ° l I o\\ / `Hawthorne °.,\ . stlq Fill Bbd- ,iG J�OI\I-11re AtAl Bta a°,a 'Jr. 99 ere Shopping Getla Hlll 5l ,` q.� C°mpl Q.� RAL°'` OS pvt \� \\ Park IIPequot \ Municipal Golf Course G°t yrd�P°' o'�';, i R endo. Hight Ian Avenues Q ✓ 9 $ \"Fir r4+t !� ✓'r �' Rurv��o no- %�i�q\q if ,\\ ` �% i yO�Pilvata r4i9 CmnB' ' \ Highland Park Sys �octivarroa'nd-. 1\ d l I V °A Pond ) �, a dStalldo Rd rii \ C'. 11 aGirllLaadI C/erq St 044 J \, _____ fld PH°ar i IpliNme N / C�\ h 1` Inlay ay' l.ell atHH.\9°Row or ompsons '� _ K:r ao thea o t �S r 1 l LYNN is �F,`rri� qY- --- -- rMeadow ° °�9y. J / Sk tik Or , t. Foresl River �\F Conservation Area ..•\ �ve law.^0/4 SA�FM IQ° tGadarua Ra III/ id. �c4 d �!<,• `fpr ��m� ✓ N '`� OTT ,p _ j dBrcres 'Av d �0 (i° e o. PPvA� 7r ! rl' ..1 i i�/) J�U f 9q I �✓ �f I - Vlll fllil Squ8rm der,q� / ,rj°r�o'OJe o\d•Pod Pd\1 l >k 011 // pe i Dri 0 /anPao� G°q Qeaer En 6odnR Towers h4e7 -I_ a9as HIGHLAND AVENUE/SWAMPSCOTT ROAD PARCELS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONE EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) WETLANDS MX63 58-96 Swanpscott Road Helen King 1 Mostly Vacant 42.2 ac. 1,205 Yes M71,62 98 Swaffpscott Road N.S. Tennis and Squash I Tennis and Squash Club 58,405 100 Yes M71,61 100 Swampscott Road N.S. Tennis and Squash I Tennis and Squash CLub 3.0 ac. 400 -Yes M61,13 15-17 Robinson S. Hutchinson I Junk Yard 9.72 ac. 580 No M313 392 Highland Avenue E. Amami R-]./B-2 Residence 1.7 ac. 300 Yes M3Lb 394 Highland Avenue N. Fiore B-2/R-4/RC Vacant 16.8 ac. 500 Yes M31,5 400 Highland Avenue N. Fiore B-2 Vacant 3.26 ac. 90 No M3L4 440-450 Highland Avenue Jerrys, Inc. B-2 Half Vacant 13.8 ac. 668 Yes MLI 402,488 Highland Avenue Warner Cable-Lessee; RC/1?-2 - 41.25 ac. 65 Yes Camp Lyon-timer t HICHLAND AVENUE/SWAMPS00IT ROAD PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT EXIST LAND AREA FRCNrAGE ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) WE:III+NU M7L145 313 Highland Avenue Moose B-2 Do-Nut/Moose 1.2 ac. 590 Buffer M7L146 323 Highland Avenue Moose B-2 Vacant 30,061 160 Yes M7L42 329 Highland Avenue Crete Realty Trust B-2/R-3 Vacant 2.88 ac. 202 Yes M7L72 333 Highland Avenue Crete Realty Trust B-2 Vacant 40,970 180 Yes M7L73 335 Highland Avenue Mcauliffe B-2 Retail 37,000 150 No M7L44 347 Highland Avenue Bracha Realty Trust B-2/11-3 Auto Sales 2.18 ac. 192 No M7L68 12-34 Swampscott Road City of Salem I/R-3 - Transfer Station - 9.2 ac. 790 Yes M7L67 36 Swaffpscott Road Colonial Realty Trust I Vacant 13,185 40 Yes M7L66 52 SaaiTpscott Road Ragone I/R-3 Vacant 10.2 ac. 469 Yes I M7L65 54 Swarrpscott Road A & J Realty Trust I Vacant 47,594 81 Yes M7L64 56 Swarpscott Road _ A & J Realty Trust I. Riding Stables 45,097 80 Yes M7L48 5 Cedar Road Cedar Rd. Trust R-3/B-2 Vacant 26,547 160 No M71,49 9-11 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 41,883 237 No M7L50 15 Cedar Road Esther Dennison R-3 Vacant 50,530 435 No M7L51 18-22 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 4.1 ac. 297 Yes M7L52 16 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 28,873 55 Yes M71,53 14 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant - 33,426 160 Yes M7L54 12 Cedar Road Esther Dennison R-3 Vacant 13,381 120 No, M7L55 10 Cedar Road Cedar Road Trust R-3 Vacant 18,088 150 No M7L58 375 Highland Avenue Cedar. Road Trust B-2/R-3 Mostly Vacant 2.0 ac. 160 No M71-60 14 Barnes Road Barnes Road Trust R-3 Vacant 7.6 ac. 45 Yes Wc4a4/OajAFRCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELDRMTr AREA F UTrAGE 03N. CCH. EXIST LANDJURISDIC. ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) ADDRESS OWNER 10,782 108 Yes M26Ib42 73 North Street ? I SQL Corporation I Sewer 12,400 56 Yes M26L29 70 Flint Street rP° 2,500 65 Yes 64 Flint Street ? I M26L30 - 6,372 109 Yes M26131 358 Bridge Street Lazarakis L 2,148 34 Yes M26L32 356 Bridge Street Lazarakis I 5,347 70 Yes M26L33 354 Bridge Street Lazarakis I I 3,276 39 No F126L34 350 Bridge Street L. Carro I 4,596 60 No M2605 346 Bridge Street DiMaggio I 21,120 425 No M261.36 336 Bridge Street Sullaway I 1,925 55 No M26L37 330 Bridge Street S. Amenta I 8,659 240 No M26L38 316 Bridge Street J & S Realty Trust I -- Bar 2,786 178 NO M26L39 230 Bridge Street Log Cabin I I Railyard 7.3 ac.. 900 Yes M26L40 None MASON/COMMERCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE CON. COX. ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) JURISDIC. M26L41 71 North Street ? I - 1.01 ac. 1285 Yes 43,351 400 Yes M26L42 None E. Greene I M26L43 1 Commercial R. C. Burnham I 21,978 195 Yes M26L44 3A Commercial R. L. Boisvert I - 14,244 130 Yes M26L45 5 Commercial R. L. Boisvert I 14,829 135 Yes M26L46 7 Commercial R. F. Milo I 1.52 ac. 215 Yes M26L55 3 Commercial R. ? I 14,209 130 Yes M26L47 38 Commercial Mason Realty Trust 1 36,790 40 Yes M26L48 34 Commercial 0. Wiggin I 30,480 190 I Yes M26L49 32 Commercial D. Wiggin 1 17,500 110 Yes M26L50 - 20 Commercial Jeannette Realty Trust 1 19,300 175 Yes M26L51 18 Commercial T. Sullivan 1 10,716 120 Yes M26L52 16 Commercial Joann Realty Trust I 4,532 - 60 Yes M26L54 8 Commercial J. Jones I 23,334 118 Yes M26L57 4 Commercial J. O'Rourke I 12,550 100 Yes M26L58 75 North Street Salem Paint I 8,160 152 Yes M26L59 83 North Street A. Aletter 1 15,783 135 No M26L60 1 S. Mason Street A. Aletter I 6,236 58 No M26L70 2 Waters J. Jones 1 11,195 103 No .M2603 9 Buffum Bay St. Adhes. 1 39,049 9 No M26L82 None W. Simmons 1 15,442 None Yes M26L83 '22 Commercial J. Kaitz 1 1.09 ac. 110 Yes MASON/COMMERCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE CON. CON. OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) JURISDIC. ADDRESS .T 20,000 190 Yes M261640 36 Commercial D. Wiggin 1 I 2.52 ac. 84 Yes M26L1 . 63 Flint Street Allied Lumber 1 30,055 70 No M26L87 41 Mason Street J. Jones I 37,033 162 No M26L89 47 Mason Street SWN Realty Trust I 2.1 ac. 346 No M26L90 50 Mason Street - Mason Realty Trust I 3.89 ac. 165 Yes M26L91 72 Flint Street. _ Salem Suede I 14,805 136 No M26L97 71 Mason Street Ruth Realty Trust I 5.4 ac. 908 Yes M2504 399 Bridge Street Sylvania KISL297 64 Boston Street A. Damore 1 11,037 381 No Alpers I 3;435 110 - No NISL"198 11 Goodhue Street M. Al P I 1.89 ac. 887 - No 9151299 13 Goodhue Street W. Gongas MI SL 300 12 Goodhue Street A. Picanco 1 2.7 ac. 521 Yes Y a Kell Realty Trust I ,618 405 No MISL301 � 2 Goodhue Street Y 25 V. Goldman I - 1.44 ac. .79 Yes - MISL311 63 Goodhue Street � -� XI5L372 28 Goodhue Street J. Murphy I 1.6 ac. 329 Yes Y 19,378 None No A. Connell I M15070 370 None - M151.769 None J. Kenney 1 4,996 None No M15L368 57 Goodhue Street R. Palermo I 25,395 .177 No M15L367 55 Goodhue Street D. Armstrong I 16,373 41 No M151237 60 Goodhue Street W. Conway I 28,000 125 Yes M16L238 50 Goodhue Street D. Cyr I _ 1.78 ac. 531 Yes X15 ?36 64 Goodhue Street N. Sawchek I 2.6 ac. 150 Yes HIGHLAND AVENUE/SWAMPSCOrP ROAD PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) WETLANDS M7L145 313 Highland Avenue Moose B-2 Do-Nut/Moose 1.2 ac. 590 Buffer M71,146 323 Highland Avenue Moose B-2 Vacant 30,061 160 Yes M7L42 329 Highland Avenue Crete Realty Trust B-2/R-3 Vacant 2.88 ac. 202 Yes M71,72 333 Highland Avenue Crete Realty Trust B-2 Vacant 40,970 180 Yes M71,73 335 Highland Avenue Mcauliffe B-2 Retail 37,000 150 No M7L44 347 Highland Avenue Bracha Realty Trust B-2/R-3 Auto Sales 2.18 ac. 192 No M71,68 12-34 Swampscott Road City of Salem I/R-3 Transfer Station 9.2 ac. 790 Yes M71,67 36 Swanpscott Road Colonial Realty Trust I Vacant 13,185 40 Yes M71,66 52 Swampscott Road Ragone I/R-3 Vacant 10.2 ac. 469 Yes M71,65 54 Swanpscott Road A & J Realty Trust I Vacant 47,594 81 Yes M71,64 - 56 Swampscott Road A & J Realty Trust I Riding Stables - 45,097 80 Yes M7L48 5 Cedar Road Cedar Rd. Trust R-3/13-2 Vacant 26,547 160 No M7L49 9-11 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 41,883 237 No M71,50 15 Cedar Road Esther Dennison R-3 Vacant 50,530 435 No M71,51 18-22 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 4.1 ac. 297 Yes M7L52 16 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 28,873 55 Yes M71,53 14 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 33,426 160 Yes M7L54 12 Cedar Road Esther Dennison R-3 Vacant 13,381 120 No M7L55 10 Cedar Road Cedar Road Trust R-3 Vacant 18,088 150 No M71,58" 375 Highland Avenue Cedar Road Trust B-2/R-3 Mostly Vacant 2.0 ac. 160 No i it M71LO 14 Barnes Road Barnes Road Trust R-3 Vacant 7.6 ac. 45 Yes HIGHLAND AVENUE/SWAMPSC3TT ROAD PARCELSFORINDUSTRIAL ZONE EXIST LAND AREA FRCNTTAGE ADDRESS OWNER ZCNE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) WETLANDS M71,63 58-96 Swanpscott Road Helen King I Mostly Vacant 42.2 ac. 1,205 Yes M71,62 98 Swampscott Road N.S. Tennis and Squash I Tennis and Squash Club 58,405 100 Yes M71,61 100 Swanpscott Road N.S. Tennis and Squash I Tennis and Squash Club 3.0 ac. 400 Yes M61,13 15-17 Robinson S. Hutchinson I Junk Yard 9.72 ac. 580 No M31,7 392 Highland Avenue E. Amanti R-1/B-2 Residence 3.4 ac. 300 Yes M31,6 394 Highland Avenue N. Fiore B-2/R-4/RC Vacant 23 ac. 500 Yes M31,5 400 Highland Avenue N. Fiore B-2 Vacant 3.26 ac. 90 No M31,4 440-450 Highland Avenue Jerrys, Inc. B-2 Half Vacant 13.8 ac. 668 Yes M3 L1 402,488 Highland Avenue Warner Cable-Lessee; RC/B-2 41.25 ac. 65 Yes Camp Lyor&-Wner i M(SCN/CDNERCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE CON. Ocm. ADDRESS OWER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) JURISDIC. 7 I 10,782 108 Yes M261,642 73 North Street M261,29 70 Flint Street SCM Corporation I Sewer 12,400 56 Yes I 2,500 65 Yes M26L30 64 Flint Street I 6,372 109 Yes M26L31 358 Bridge Street _ Lazarakis I 2,148 34 Yes M26L32 356 Bridge Street Lazarakis I 5,347 70 Yes M261.33 354 Bridge Street Lazarakis I 3,276 39 No M26L34 350 Bridge Street L. Garro I 4,596 60 No M26L35 346 Bridge Street DiMaggio M26L36 336 Bridge Street Sullaway I 21,120 425 No I 1,925 55 No M26L37 330 Bridge Street S. Amenta M26L38 316 Bridge Street J & S Realty Trust I 8,659 240 No M26L39 230 Bridge Street Log Cabin I Bar 2,786 178 No I Railyard 7.3 ac. 900 Yes M261,40 None MASON/COMMERCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT E%IST LAND AREA - FRONTAGE CON. COM. ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) JURISDIC. M26L41 71 North Street ? I 1.01 ac. 1285 Yes M26142 None E. Greene I 43,351 400 Yes M26L43 1 Commercial R. C. Burnham I 21,978 195 Yes M26L44 3A Commercial R. L. Boisvert I 14,244 130 Yes M261.45 5 Commercial R. L. Boisvert I 14,829 135 Yes M26L46 7 Commercial R. F. Milo I 1.52 ac. 215 Yes M26L55 3 Commercial R. ? - 1 14,209 130 Yes M26L47 38 Commercial Mason Realty Trust I 36,790 40 Yes M261-48 34 Commercial D. Wiggin I 30,480 190 Yes M26L49 32 Commercial D. Wiggin I 17,500 110 Yes M26L50 20 Commercial Jeannette Realty Trust I 19,300 175 Yes M26L51 18 Commercial T. Sullivan I 10,716 120 Yes M261L52 16 Commercial Joann Realty Trust I 4,532 60 Yes M261.54 8 Commercial J. Jones I 23,334 118 Yes M26L57 4 Commercial J. O'Rourke I 12,550 100 Yes M26L58 75 North Street Salem Paint I 8,160 _ 152 Yes M26L59 83 North Street A. Aletter I 15,783 135 No M261L60 1 S. Mason Street A. Aletter 1 6,236 58 No M26L70 2 Waters J. Jones I 17,195 - 103 No M26L73 9 Buffum Bay St. Adhes. I 39,049 9 No M261L82 None W. Simmons I 15,442 None Yes M26L83 '22 Commercial J. Kaitz I 1.09 ac. 110 Yes MASON/COMMERCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE CON. COM. ADDRESS OWNER - ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) JURISDIC. M26L640 36 Commercial D. Wiggin I 20,000 190 Yes M26L1 63 Flint Street Allied Lumber I - 2.52 ac. 84 Yes M26LB7 41 Mason Street J. Jones I 30,055 70 No M26L89 47 Mason Street SWH Realty Trust I 37,033 162 No M26L90 50 Mason Street Mason Realty Trust I 2.1 ac. 346 No M26L91 72 Flint Street Salem Suede I - 3.89 ac. 165 Yes M26L97 71 Mason Street Ruth Realty Trust I 14,805 136 No M2504 399 Bridge Street Sylvania I 5.4 ac. 908 Yes M15L297 64 Boston Street A. Damore I 11,037 381 No M15L298 11 Goodhue Street M. Alpers I - 3,435 110 No M15L299 13 Goodhue Street W. Gongas I 1.89 ac. 887 No MI5L300 12 Goodhue Street A. Picanco I 2.7 ac. 521 Yes M15001 2 Goodhue Street Kelly Realty Trust I 25,618 405 No M15L371 63 Goodhue Street V. Goldman I 1.44 ac. 79 Yes M15L372 28 Goodhue Street J. Murphy I 1.6 ac. 329 Yes M15L370 None A. Connelly I 19,378 None No M15L369 None J. Kenney - I 4,996 None No M15L368 57 Goodhue Street R. Palermo I 25,395 -177 No M15L367 55 Goodhue Street D. Armstrong I 16,373 41 No M151L237 60 Goodhue Street W. Conway I - 28,000. 125 Yes M16L238 50 Goodhue Street D. Cyr I e 1.78 ac. _ 531 Yes l M15L236 64 Goodhue Street N. Sawchek I 2.6 ac. 150 Yes HIGHLAND AVENUE/SWAMPSODTT ROAD PARCELS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONE EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. FL.) (Feet) WETLANDS M7L63 58-96 Swanpscott Road Helen King I Mostly Vacant 42.2 ac. 1,205 Yes M7L62 98 Swanpscott Road N.S. Tennis and Squash I Tennis and Squash Club 58,405 100 Yes MM61 100 Swanpscott Road N.S. Tennis and Squash I Tennis and Squash Club 3.0 ac. 400 Yes M61,13 15-17 Robinson S. Hutchinson I Junk Yard 9.72 ac. 580 No M31,7 392 Highland Avenue E. Amanti R-1/B-2 Residence 1.7 ac. 300 Yes M3L6 394 Highland Avenue N. Fiore B-2/R-4/RC Vacant 16.8 ac. 500 Yes M31,5 400 Highland Avenue N. Fiore B-2 Vacant 3.26 ac. 90 No M3L4 440-450 Highland Avenue Jerrys, Inc. B-2 Half Vacant 13.8 ac. 668 Yes M31.1 402,488 Highland Avenue Warner Cable-Lessee; RC/B-2 41.25 ac. 65 Yes Caup Lyon-Caner t 1 HIGIMND AVI•NUE/SWAMPSOOIT ROAD PARCFIS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVEC.OPM Tr EXIST ' LAND AREA FRONTAGE ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) WETLAND M7L145 313 Highland Avenue Moose B-2 Do-Nut/Moose 1.2 ac. 590 Buffer M71,146 323 Highland Avenue Moose B-2 Vacant 30,061 160 Yes M7L42 329 Highland Avenue Crete Realty Trust B-2/R-3 Vacant 2.88 ac. 202 Yes M71,72 333 Highland Avenue Crete Realty Trust B-2 Vacant 40,970 180 Yes M71,73 335 Highland Avenue Mcauliffe B-2 Retail 37,000 150 No M7L44 347 Highland Avenue Bracha Realty Trust B-2/R-3 Auto Sales 2.18 ac. 192 No M7L68 12-34 SwartQscott Road City of Salem I/R-3 Transfer Station 9.2 ac. 790 Yes M7L67 36 Swampscott Road Colonial Realty Trust I Vacant 13,185 40 Yes M71,66 52 Swampscott Road Ragone I/R-3 Vacant 10.2 ac. 469 Yes I M71,65 54 Swaffpscott Road A & J Realty Trust I Vacant 47,594 81 Yes M71,64 56 SwanQscott Road _ A & J Realty Trust I Riding Stables 45,097 80 Yes M7L48 5 Cedar Road Cedar Rd. Trust R-3/B-2 Vacant 26,547 160 No M7L49 9-11 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 41,883 237 No M71,50 15 Cedar Road Esther Dennison R-3 Vacant 50,530 435 No M71,51 18-22 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 4.1 ac. 297 Yes M71,52 16 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 28,873 55 Yes M7L53 14 Cedar Road John Ingemi R-3 Vacant 33,426 160 Yes M71,54 12 Cedar Road Esther Dennison R-3 Vacant 13,381 '120 No. MX55 10 Cedar Road Cedar Road Trust R-3 Vacant 18,088 150 No r WL58 375 Highland Avenue Cedar Road Trust B-2/R-3 Mostly Vacant 2.0 ac. 160 No WL60 14 Barnes Road Barnes Road Trust R-3 Vacant 7.6 ac. 45 Yes MA,,CN/O(}MMCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVEIAPMINC AREA FRLTTIAGE CON. CCH. LAND JURISDIC. EXIST ADDRESS CWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) 10,782 108 Yes M26Ib42 73 North Street ? I 56 Yes SCM Corporation I Sewer 12,400 M261,29 70 Flint Street rP° 2,500 65 Yes M26L30 64 Flint Street ? I 6,372 109 Yes M26L31 358 Bridge Street Lazarakis I 2,148 34 Yes M26L32 356 Bridge Street Lazarakis I 5,347 70 Yes M26L33 354 Bridge Street Lazarakis I 3,276 39 No M26L34 350 Bridge Street L. Garro I 4,596 60 No M2605 346 Bridge Street DiMaggio I . 21,120 425 No M26L36 336 Bridge Street Sullaway I 1,925 55 No M26L37 330 Bridge Street S. Amenta I _. 8,659 240 No 142608 316 Bridge Street J & S Realty Trust I Bar 2,786 178 No N26L39 230 Bridge Street Log Cabin I ' Railyard 7.3 ac,. 900 Yes M26L40 None ? I MASON/COMMERCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT • EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE CON. COM. ADDRESS OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) JURISDIC. M26L41 71 North Street ? ] 1.01 ac. 1285 Yes 43,351 400 Yes M26L42 None E. Greene I _ M26L43 1 Commercial R. C. Burnham I 21,978 195 Yes M26L44 3A Commercial R. L. Boisvert 1 14,244 _ 130 Yes M26L45 5 Commercial R. L. Boisvert I 14,829 135 Yes M26L46 7 Commercial R. F. Milo I 1.52 ac. 215 Yes M26L55 3 Commercial R. ? I 14,209 130 Yes M26L47 38 Commercial Mason Realty Trust I 36,790 40 Yes M26L48 34 Commercial D. Wiggin I 30,480 190 Yes I M26L49 32 Commercial D. Wiggin I 17,500 110 Yes M26L50 20 Commercial Jeannette Realty Trust I 19,300 175 Yes M26L51 18 Commercial I. Sullivan I 10,716 1'20 Yes M26L52 16 Commercial Joann Realty Trust I 4,532 - 60 Yes M26L54 8 Commercial J. Jones I 23,334 118 Yes M26L57 .4 Commercial J. O'Rourke I 12,550 100 Yes M26L58 75 North Street Salem Paint I 8,160 152 Yes M26L59 83 North Street A. Aletter I 15,783 135 No M26L60 1 S. Mason Street A. Aletter I 6,236 58 No M26L70 2 Waters J. Jones 1 17,195 103 No M26L73 9 Buffum Bay St. Adhes. I 39,049 9 No M26L82 None W. Simmons I 15,442 None Yes M26L83 '22 Commercial J. Kaitz I - 1.09 ac. 110 Yes • MASON/COMMERCIAL STREETS PARCELS FOR BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT • EXIST LAND AREA FRONTAGE CON. COM. OWNER ZONE USE (Sq. Ft.) (Feet) JURISDIC. ADDRESS � �. 20,000 190 Yes M26L640 36 Commercial D. Wiggin T 2.52 ac. 84 Yes M26L1. 63 Flint Street Allied Lumber I 30,055 70 No M26LB7 41 Hason Street J. Jones T — I 37,033 162 No M26LB9 47 Mason Street - SWN Realty Trust I 2.1 ac. 346 No M26L90 50 Mason Street - Mason Realty Trust , I 3.89 ac. 165 Yes N26L91 72 Flint Street •. Salem Suede 1 14,805 136 No M26L97 71 Mason Street .Ruth Realty Trust I 5.4 ac. 908 Yes M2504 399 Bridge Street Sylvania I 11,037 3B1 No M15L297 64 Boston Street A. Damore 13,435 110 No M15L•298 11 Goodhue Street M. Alpers I 1.89 ac. 887 - No M15L299 13 Goodhue Street W. Gongas I 2.7 ac. 521 Yes NISL300 12 Goodhue Street - A. Picanco Kell Realty Trust I ,618 405 No M15L301 Y Y 25- 2 Goodhue Street MI5071 63 Goodhue Street V. Goldman I ... 1.44 ac. 79 Yes - MI5072 28 Goodhue Street J. Murphy 1.6 ac. 329 Yes M15L]IO None A. Connelly I 19,378 None No MISL369 None J. Kenney I 4,996 None No M15L368 57 Goodhue Street R. Palermo I 25,395 177 No 915L367 55 Goodhue Street D. Armstrong 1 - 16,373 41 No M15L237 60 Goodhue Street W. Conway 1 28,000 125 Yes MIGL238 50 Goodhue Street 0. Cyr I _ 1.78 ac. 531 Yes Y1517]fi 64 Goodhue Street N. Sawchek - 1 2.6 ac. 150 Yes CITY OF SALEM An Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Salem, that the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem, adopted on August 27, 1965, as heretofore amended, be further amended as follows: Section One: Add to Section III A, Types of Districts below B-5 District, the following: Business Park Development District--which is intended to be those areas within which clean business and industry is developed. Section Two: Add to Section V A, Permitted Uses below I--Districts--Industrial, the following: Business Park Development Districts: a. Steam laundry or dry cleaning plant, carpet or rug cleaning plant. b. Food and beverage manufacturing, bottling or processing or commissary. c. Assembly or packaging of articles not exceeding two hundred (200) pounds in weight, provided that no manufacturing or processing is carried. d. Printing, binding, publishing and related arts and trades. e. General office buildings including business and professional offices and ancillary activities (i.e. cafeteria facilities). f. General storage, warehousing and wholesale distribution uses. g. Publishing and printing establishments. h. Manufacturing, packaging, assembly, reconditioning, processing, pharmaceuticals and other related products, research and testing of the following types of industries: food and kindred products, apparel, electronics and electrical products, furniture and fixtures, primary and fabricated metal products, box manufacturing, textile manufacturing, boot and shoe manufacturing, frozen food storage, ice manufacturing, including the storage of new materials and containers used in or incidental to any of the foregoing. Provided that such operations: 1. are not specifically prohibited from the City of Salem, according to the schedule of prohibited uses in Section V-C. 2. are not dangerous by reason of hazard from fire or explosion. 3. are not offensive, detrimental, injurious, noxious, or hazardous by reason of causing dust, smoke, odor, fumes, radiation, ground water discharge, noise, vibration, traffic congestion, or other nuisance. -2- 4. are compatible with adjacent non-industrial uses. i. Laboratories or research facilities, including medical and other research, provided manufacturing is clearly incidental to the operation of the facility, does not exceed fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area of the building and is not offensive, injurious, noxious, detrimental, or hazardous by reason of dust, smoke, odor, fumes, noise, radiation, ground water discharge, traffic congestion or other nuisances. Section Three: Add to Section VI, Density Regulations after C. Central Development District Uses, the following: Business Park Development District A building erected herafter for uses permitted in the Business Park Development District shall meet the requirements set forth in Table IV. In interpreting Table IV, the same provisions as apply for interpreting Table I, shall apply. Section Four: Add to Section VI, Density Regulations, after Table III, the following: Table IV Business Park Development District Minimum Lot Area 40,000 Minimum Lot Width 150 Maximum Lot Coverage 45% Minimum Depth of Front Yard 50 Minimum Width of Side Yard 30 Minimum Depth of Rear Yard 50 Maximum Height of Buildings 50 Maximum Height of Fences 10 Buffer Area Required 75' from any residential or conservation use Open Space Required 10% Parking Required Subject to Planning Board approval. -3- Section Five: Add to Section VII, Supplementary Regulations, after P, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts, the following: Business Park Development District I. Purpose: The Business Park Development District is designed to provide encouragement for the development of land uses which will further the objectives of: a) the creation of clean business and industry within the City; b) enhancement of the City's employment base; c) enhancement of the City's tax and revenue base; and d) the development of land uses compatible with adjacent land uses. It is also the intent of this section to ensure compliance with the Master Plan and acceptable zoning practices. 2. Special Permit: a. No development in excess of 10,000 square feet of gross building area shall be allowed within the Business Park Development Zoning District without a Business Park Development Special Permit from the Planning Board. b. Any petition filed for a Business Park Development under this section shall be accompanied by five copies of a site plan which shall be at a scale to be established by the Planning Board and shall include five copies of all information required for a "Definitive Plan" under Section III B of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem and such petition shall also be accompanied by five copies of an Environmental Impact Statement as set out in Appendix A of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem. The site plan shall also contain the following information: 1. Location and dimensions of all building and other construction; 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas, walkways, and driveways; 3. Internal roadways and accessways to adjacent public roadways; 4. Location and type of external lighting; 5. Location, type, dimensions, and quantities of landscaping and screening; 6. Locations and dimensions of utilities, including water, surface drainage, sewer, and other waste disposal; 7. Location of snow storage areas; 8. Location of existing natural features, including ponds, bridges, streams, and wetlands. -4- Such site plan shall also be accompanied by a brief narrative, as requested by the Planning Board, addressing these concerns in the following defined categories: a) buildings; b) parking and loading; c) traffic flow and circulation; d) external lighting; e) landscaping and screening; f) u ' ' ' s; g) snow removal. The Planning Board shall review such su mittal i ormation in accordance with accepted site planning standards and attempt to promote such standards and make certain that the development, if approved, takes place in a manner which will in all aspects be an asset to the City. The Planning Board shall request changes in such plans and information submitted to promote the quality of the development and its impact upon the health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City. c. The Planning Board shall, with seven (7) days after receipt of said application, transmit one copy of said application and plan to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health, and Conservation Commission, who may, at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendations to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall not take final action on such plan until it has received a report thereon from the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health, and Conservation Commission or until thirty-five (35) days have elapsed after distribution of such application without submission of a report. Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Fire Department, Police Department, Superintendent of Streets and School Department, and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning Board and a public hearing shall be held within sixty-five (65) days after filing of an application in accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A. d. Failure of the Planning Board to take final action upon an application within ninety (90) days following the date of the public hearing shall be deemed to be a grant of the permit applied for. e. After a notice and public hearing as set forth above, the Planning Board by a two-thirds vote, may grant such a special permit provided that: A -5- 1. JThe surrounding area is residential in nature or is land reserved for conservation use, or is land which the Board determines to be appropriate for such a requirement, a 75' buffer zone shall exist around the parcel being proposed for development within which no construction or disturbance of land, excepting approved landscaping or screening, shall take place.surrounding area is residential in nature or is land reserved for conservation use, or is land which the Board determines to be appropriate for such a requirement, a 75' buffer zone shall exist around the parcel being proposed for development within which no construction or disturbance of land, excepting approved landscaping or screening, shall take place. 2. To enhance the quality of the development and to maintain adequate open space, 10% of all land area must be maintained as open space. No construction of any kind shall take place in such area. 3. Parking and loading requirements sh be met as defined in Sectio II nd D of this Ordinance and as reiterated as flows: 4. The proposed development shall properly sc all buildings, structures d other construction with vegetative landscaping, earth berms, fencing, or other appropriate screening as determined by the Planning Board. 5. The Planning Board may, in appropriate cases as it determines, impose further restrictions upon the Business Park Development or parts thereof as a condition to granting the Special Permit, and may waive any defined restrictions and requirements as deemed inappropriate by the Planning Board. F. In addition to the uses set out as permitted uses in the Business Park Development District in Section V-A, the development of other uses shall also be allowed, at the discretion of the Planning Board if the Board determines that such use will complement existing and proposed uses, and act as an acceptable ancillary use. Such other uses to be considered are as follows: a) restaurant and other eating establishments; and b) hotels, motels and other lodging establishments. G. In exercising its jurisdiction, the Planning Board shall conform to all requirements of procedure applicable under the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, as amended, and the Salem Zoning Ordinance. H. Any Special Permit granted hereunder shall lapse within two (2) years if substantial construction thereof has not commenced by such date except for good cause. -6- Section Six: Add to Section VII, Supplementary Regulations, the following: Site Plan Review 1, Purpose: For the purposes of protecting and promoting the health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City, promoting acceptable site planning practices and standards within the City of Salem and I ensuring compliance with the City of Salem Master Plan and good zoning practices, a site plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Board for the construction and development of any building or buildings exceeding 10,000 square feet in non-residential gross building area, or exceeding six (6) residential dwelling units. 2. Any petition filed for Site Plan Review under this section shall be accompanied by five copies of a site plan which shall be at a scale to be established by the Planning Board, and, according to the size of the development, shall include five copies of all information required for a "Definitive Plan" under Sction III B of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem and such petiton shall also be accompanied by five copies of an Environmental Impact Statement as set out in Appendix A of the Subdivision Regulations of the Planning Board of the City of Salem, as requested. The plan shall contain the following information: a) Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction; b) Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas, walkways, and driveways; c) Internal roadways and accessways to adjacent public roadways; d) Location and type of external lighting; e) Location, type, dimensions and quantities of landscaping and screening; f) Location and dimensions of utilities, including water, surface drainage, sewer, and other waste disposal; g) Location of snow storage areas; h) Location of all existing natural features, including ponds, brooks, streams, and wetlands; Such site plan shall also be accompanied by a brief narrative, as requested by the Planning Board, addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate 1 � J -7- concerns in the following defined categories: a) buildings; b) parking and loading; c) traffic flow and circulation; d) external lighting; e) landscaping and screening; f) utilities; g) snow removal; h) natural area protection and enhancement, and i) compatibility of the architecture of proposed development with existing architecture of the surrounding area. The Planning Board shall review such submitted information in accordance with accepted site planning standards and attempt to promote such standards and make certain that the development, if approved, takes place in a manner which shall in all aspects be an asset to the City. The Planning Board shall request changes in such plans and information submitted to promote the quality of the development and its impact upon the health, convenience and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City. The Planning Board shall review and amend all such submitted plans in accordance with the following criteria: a) adequacy of parking facilities and number of parking spaces proposed for each development; b) adequacy of loading facilities c) adequacy of traffic circulation system d) adequacy of access points and routes to and from the land parcel to adjoining streets and ways. e) adequacy of type and amount of external lighting to be provided on the parcel; f) adequacy of type, quality, and quantity of landscaping to promote an aesthetically pleasing environment; g) adequacy of type, quality, and quantity of vegetative screening to protect adjacent and nearby land parcels from structures not aesthetically pleasing or wholly compatible with such parcels; h) adequacy of the methods of disposal of sewage, refuse, and other waste; i) adequacy of the method of surface drainage across and from the site; j) adequacy of method of water distribution to and from the parcel and its structures; k) adequacy of pedestrian circulation systems to and from parking areas and structures; 1) adequacy of protection or enhancement of natural areas; m) compatibility of architecture of structures with architecture of surrounding or nearby buildings. -8- 3. The Planning Board shall, within seven (7) days after receipt of said application, transmit one copy of said application and plan to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendations to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall not take final action on such plan until it has received a report therein from the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health, and Conservation Commission or until thirty-five (35) days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report. Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Fire Department, Police Department, Superintendent of Streets and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning Board and a public hearing shall be held within sixty-five (65) days after filing of an application in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. 4. Failure of the Planning Board to take final action upon an application within ninety (90) days following the date of the public hearing shall be deemed to be a grant of the approval applied for. 5. After a notice and public hearing as set forth above, the Planning Board, by a two-thirds vote, may approve the plan provided that: a. the proposed development shall properly screen itself, its buildings, structures, and other construction with vegetative landscaping, earth berms, fencing, or other appropriate screening as determined by the Planning Board. b. To protect the quality of the surrounding area and environment, if such surrounding area is residential in nature, is land reserved for conservation use, or is land which the Board determines to applicable for such a requirement, a buffer zone shall exist along the property line within which no construction or destruction of land shall take place. The size of such zone shall be determined by the Planning Board according to the size of the proposed development, the type of surrounding area, and the aesthetics and other impact of the proposed development upon such surrounding areas. c. In specific instances where the Planning Board deems such to be appropriate, it shall assess the compatibility of the architecture of a proposed development with the architecture of surrounding structures and land uses, and may request amendments to the architecture of such proposed development to ensure compatibility. -9- d. The Planning Board may, in appropriate cases as it determines, impose further restrictions upon the development or parts thereof as a condition to granting the approval and may waive any defined restrictions. 6. In exercising its jurisdiction, the Planning Board shall conform to all requirements of procedure applicable under the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, as amended, and the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 7. Any approval granted hereunder shall lapse within two (2) years if substantial construction thereof has not commenced by such date except for good cause.