FORM C DECISION,PLAN CLARK AVE - PLANNING v
1
(
P
y
�I
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
r
Form C—Decision
Definitive Subdivision Decision, Stormwater Permit, and Cluster Residential Development
Special Permit
Clark Avenue(Map 6 Lots 7, 8 and 9)
February 22, 2016
Serafini, Darling and Correnti, LLP
C/o Attorney Correnti
63 Federal Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
RE: Decision of the Clark Avenue Subdivision—Form C (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9)
On September 17, 2015, the Salem Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for a proposal
submitted by NSD Realty Trust (hereafter referred to as "applicant') to allow the
construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots on Clark Avenue,
Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9. The public hearing for the Definitive Subdivision, Form
C and Cluster Residential Special Permit was continued to October 15, 2015. At the October
15, 2015, public hearing the Salem Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for the proposal
of a Stormwater Permit to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance greater than one
acre of land within the City of Salem for the subject subdivision. The Cluster Residential
Special Permit and Stormwater Permit were continued to the November 19, 2015, December
3, 2015, December 17, 2015, January 7, 2016, January 21, 2016, February 4, 2016, and
February 18, 2016.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 18, 2016, the public hearing
for the Form C-Definitive Subdivision, Cluster Residential Development Special Permit,
Stormwater was closed and the Board voted Seven (7) in favor, (Ben Anderson, Matt Veno,
Helen Sides, Kirt Rieder, Carole Hamilton, Dale Yale, and Noah Koretz) none opposed, to --
approve the project. Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of the
Special Permits has been met by the Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose
and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and would not result in a net negative environmental
impact. The Board finds that the subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential
development because the plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance to protect and promote health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the
inhabitants of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. The Board
finds that the subdivision meets the purposes of residential development because it promotes
the more efficient use of land in harmony with existing natural features.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 2 of 11
The Board recognized that the building lots created and the buildings to be constructed
thereon may have dimensional controls and density regulations varying from those otherwise
permitted by the ordinance or by-law and the approvals are subject to the allowing conditions
and waivers and/or relief:
1. Conformance with the Plan
a. Work shall conform to the set of plans containing sheets 1 through 11, entitled, "The
Woodlands", and prepared by Williams and Sparages, 189 North Main Street, Suite
101, Middleton, MA 01949, dated August 17, 2015, and revised September 4, 2015;
November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015; and January 22, 2016 and the landscaping
plans entitled, "Clark Avenue Entry Perspective" and "Entry Planting Plan" dated
December 2, 2015 prepared by LeBlanc Jones Architects, Inc.
2. Endorsement of the Plans
a. Following the statutory twenty (20) day appeal period, the Planning Board will
endorse the original subdivision plans, subject to conditions of this decision, which
shall be recorded at the South Essex Registry of Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the
plans, the following items must be submitted for approval by the Planning Board:
i. A covenant to secure the construction of ways and installation of municipal
services, including required description of mortgages and assents of
mortgagees.
ii. Acceptable form of grants of easements, if applicable.
iii. This decision shall be referenced on the original plans prior to the endorsement
by the Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the
Essex South Registry of Deeds.
3. Amendments
a. Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the
Planning Board unless deemed insignificant by the City Planner. Any waiver of
conditions contained within this decision shall require approval of the Planning
Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
a. The Subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the
Subdivision Rules and Regulations and any other applicable regulations as affected
by this decision.
5. Waivers
a. In approving the Plans, the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the
Subdivision Rules and Regulations:
f
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 4 of 11
The Owner shall either file a performance bond, a deposit of money or
negotiable securities, or a tri-party agreement in an amount determined by the
Board to be sufficient to cover the cost of all or any one phase of the sub-
division of the improvements. Surety, if filed or deposited, shall be approved
as to form and manner of execution by the City Solicitor and as to sureties by
the City Treasurer and shall be contingent on the construction of the roadway
through binder course. The amount of the surety shall be reasonably
determined by the Engineering Department.
The Owner.,may-file ra-covenant to_secuie_the_.construction-ofways_and
s�es,for-the-entire sub division and said covenant may be partiallyreleasedm
c_ � _`p _. _p rty—gr- . - .
for bases of-the;suh-divlsion- _by- bond surety—or tri- a a eemenf`being_,,
file d-for:any phase or phases-of-the_subdivisiort.a—--- -- - A
-i
ii. Time Frame
If such ways and services are not completed within two (2) years of the date of
endorsement of the plan, approval of the plan may be rescinded unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Board. The Planning Board
acknowledges that the timeframe and completion of the entire subdivision is
anticipated to be two years, and will not unreasonably withhold extensions.
8. Homeowner's Association
a. The Draft Home Owners Association Documents shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning and Community Development, for reasonable review as to
form and content prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for the
proposed dwellings. These documents shall include the following responsibilities:
i. Ownership and/or maintenance of the storm water management system;
ii. Ownership and/or maintenance of the trail system and open space (if the open
space and trail system are not to be owned by the City of Salem).
iii. Ownership and/or maintenance of walls located in the subdivision that are not
situated on the lots in the sub-division.
b. The City of Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Homeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
a. Open Space as shown on the Plans and consisting of approximately 1.95 acres shall
be perpetually preserved as open space. The Open Space shall be placed in a
corporation or trust owned or to be owned by the owners of lots within the
subdivision with provisions for limited easements for recreational use by residents of
the City of Salem; provided that such ownership shall vest the Board sufficient rights
to enforce compliance with restrictions imposed by the Board as a condition of its
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 3 of 11
i. Section IV A.4.a: Maximum Length of Dead-end Streets is waived to allow a
length of 1089.03 feet based on the requirement for the installation of sprinkler
systems in the dwellings.
ii. Section IV A.l.f: Minimum centerline radii of two hundred thirty feet for a
curved street.
iii. Section IV: Right of way improvements which require street trees to be 3.5
inches caliper, 30 feet on center, in place thereof allow 2 trees per lot.
iv. Section IV A.2.a.: Minimum width of sidewalk for a minor/deadend street 5
feet, in place thereof allow a 4 foot concrete sidewalk with a grass strip of no
less than 3.5 feet on each side.
b. In the judgment of the Planning Board, the granting of the above waivers is in the
public interest and consistent with the intent of the subdivision control law.
6. Transfer of Ownership
a. Within five days of transfer of ownership of the subdivision, the Owner shall notify
the Board in writing of the new owner's name and address. This shall not include the
sale of lots within the subdivision in the ordinary course of business, but only a sale
of the entire subdivision. The terms, conditions, restrictions and/or requirements of
this decision shall be binding on the Owner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Security (Section III(B)(5) of the Subdivision Regulations)
a. Prior to the release of any lots for sale or building, the Planning Board shall require
that an'acceptable form of surety is posted along with-a proposed schedule of releases.
If partial`release`ofsurety is to be requested the Planning Board may,,at its discretion,
require deposits to bebroken down in amounts ofanflcipated-requests-for-release. The
applicant agrees to complete the required-improvements in accordance with Section V
of the Subdivision Regulations for the subdivision. Such construction and installation
is to be secured by one and/or in part by the other of the following methods which
may from time to time be varied by the applicant with the reasonable approval of the
Planning Board.
b. Endorsement of Approval with Covenant
The Owner shall file a-covenant;_prior.to-endorsement by the Planning Board,
executed and to be.duly.recorded with-the-Subdivision Plans,by.the owner-of
record, which instrument shall the land, and shall state such ways and services
sh wo n on the approved plans dated August 17, 2015, and revised September 4,
2015; November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015 and January 22, 2016 shall be
provided to serve any and all lots before any lot may be built upon or
conveyed, other than by mortgage; and deed; and/or
i. Endorsement of Approval with Bonds, Surety or Tri-Party Agreement
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 5 of 11
Cluster Special Permit. The easement documents shall allow for passive, non-
motorized recreation and shall empower the City at its discretion, to make
improvements to the trail system.
b. The open space shall be opened for public use upon the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the final dwelling or at such an earlier time as mutually agreed to by
the applicant and the Board.
10.Salem Conservation Commission
a. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work.
11.Trails
a. Prior to the release of the final Certificate of Occupancy, the trail for the open space
will be laid, flagged and completed by the Owner. The path shall consist of woodchip
surface as it will have the least impact on the natural setting.
b. Trail segments will be cleared by manual cutting of brush and tree saplings no greater
than a 3 inch caliper to facilitate passage. All materials cut or cleared shall be chipped
and left in place. No earthmoving grading or mowing will occur. Small brush will be
cut and dispersed into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles
or mechanical equipment (other than chippers, clippers, loppers, and small chain saws
for the clearing) will be employed.
c. Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the trailheads. Sign
design and proposed location shall be submitted for approval to the City Planner prior
to installation.
12.Safety Improvements
a. The applicant has agreed to paint a crosswalk which will lead from the end of the
sidewalk on the northeasterly side of Clark Avenue to the sidewalk on the
southwesterly side of Clark Avenue (which continues to the intersection with Clark
Street). The exact location shall be approved by the City's Police Safety Officer.
b. The applicant has also agreed to paint a center line on a portion of existing Clark
Avenue to guide motorists through the bend. The striping and signage shall be
installed as shown on the "Proposed Traffic Marking & Signage Plan", dated
February 1, 2016, prepared by Williams & Sparages.
c. The applicant has agreed to repair the sidewalk as needed at the northerly end of
Clark Avenue from the end of the existing granite curbing on Clark Avenue northerly
to the intersection of Clark Avenue and Clark Street.
d. The applicant shall work with the City and remove a the rock at I Clark Avenue and
realigning the fence impeding sight distance on Clark Avenue once the City obtains
approval from the private land owner.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 6 of 11
13.Board of Health
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Board of
Health.
b. The applicant shall provide the City Health Agent the name, address and telephone
number of the project manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the
construction of the project.
c. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency
Plan, no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible
for the site certifies that the soil and ground water on the entire site meets the DEP
standards for the proposed use.
d. The developer shall adhere to the drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer.
e. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area
prior to construction, demolition, and/or basting and shall send a copy of the
exterminators invoice to the Health Agent.
f. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
g. The developer shall submit the City Health Agent a written plan for dust control and
street sweeping which will occur during construction.
h. The developer shall submit the City Health Agent a written plan for the containment
and removal or debris, vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material
generated during demolition and/or construction.
i. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for firefighting.
j. Noise levels from the resultant establishments generated by operations, including but
not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level
by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels at the property line.
k. The developer shall disclose in writing to the City Health Agent the origin of any fill
material needed for the project.
1. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its
operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health.
m. The developer shall install grease traps, to contain grease in gray water, prior to
entering the city sewer system in developments with 10 or more units and in
compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer.
n. Radon mitigation systems shall be installed.
o. The final construction shall comply with all requirements of the Massachusetts State
Sanitary code.
p. The developer shall notify the City Health Agents when the project is complete for
final inspection and confirmation that the above conditions have been met.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 7 of 11
14.Drainage Infrastructure Improvements
a. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark
Avenue as depicted on the plan entitled "Proposed Drainage Improvement Plan in
Salem, MA" dated December 16, 2015, revised January 27, 2016, prepared by
Williams & Sparages. The drainage improvements shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, including temporary pavement of the trenches,
within ninety (90) days of work starting on the proposed subdivision site. Temporary
paving shall remain and be maintained by the applicant, until the proposed
subdivision is ready for final overlay at which time all final offsite overlay paving
will be performed in conjunction with the final overlay of the subdivision.
b. The pavement replacement program applied to Clark Avenue shall consist of 1'h
inches of overlay paving per the limits of the Williams & Sparages plan referenced in
paragraph a. above. Final grading of the top mix shall promote stormwater
conveyance to the newly installed and existing drainage facilities on Clark Street and
not cause any issues with existing driveways. Pavement will take place in
conjunction with the final overlay being performed within the Woodlands
Subdivision.
c. If deemed necessary, prior to beginning the drainage improvement work the applicant
shall file a Request for Determination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation
Commission and a Notice of Intent.
15.Sewer
a. The applicant shall pay One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) to the City for
the performance of an Infiltration and Inflow Identification and Removal program for
the approximately 2,700 linear foot sewer system to which the proposed subdivision
shall discharge sewerage. This $100,000 payment equals a contribution of$3,846.15
per house in the proposed subdivision of 26 homes.
b. Payments by the applicant to the City shall be made in accordance with the following
schedule:
i. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first house
lot;
ii. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the eighth house
lot;
iii. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the sixteenth
house lot; and
iv. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the twenty-
fourth house lot.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 8 of 11
16.Fire Department
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Fire
Department, including temporary access during construction.
17.Building Inspector
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Building
Inspector.
18.Lighting
a. Street lighting shall be in conformances with the plan dated August 17, 2015, and
revised September 4, 2015; November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015 and January 22,
2016.
b. Street lighting installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Electrician.
Street lights shall be outfitted with LED bulbs. The street lighting shall be the
responsibility of the Applicant until such time as the City accepts the street.
c. The Owner shall coordinate with the electric company and the City Electrician regarding
the installation of street lighting within the Subdivision.
19.Noise
a. HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further
mitigate noise emanating from HVAC units if the Board of Health receives any
complaints. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the guideline for reviewing such noise is
that the broadband sound level should not increase by more than 10 dB (A) above the
ambient levels measured at the property line.
b. The method of screening HVAC units shall be submitted to the City Planner for
review and approval prior to installation.
20.Pre-Construction Conference
a. Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivision, a pre-construction conference
shall be scheduled with the City Planner, the City Engineer (or his designee), the
Building Commissioner, the Health Agent, and any other departments that may be
necessary. The Owner shall submit a construction schedule at the time of the pre-
construction conference.
21.Construction Practices
a. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
i. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,
regulations, and ordinances of the City of Salem.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 9 of 11
ii. No work shall commence before 8:00 AM on weekdays and Saturdays. No
work shall continue beyond 5:00 PM. There shall be no work conducted on
Sundays or holidays. Inside work of a quite nature may be permitted at other
times.
iii. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday — Friday between 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. There shall be no drilling or blasting, or rock hammering on
Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance
with all local and state regulations.
iv. The pre-blast survey shall be extended to include the existing subsurface drain.
V. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of
construction on abutters. Advanced notice shall be provided to all abutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction.
vi. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they
do not leave direct and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the
site.
vii. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,
regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem.
viii. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site must be completely located
on the site.
ix. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be
submitted by the applicant to the Building Inspector for review and approval
prior to the issuance of a building permit. Including in this plan, but not
limited to, shall be information regarding how equipment will be stores, a
description of the construction staging areas and its location in relation to the
site, and where the construction employees will pack their vehicles.
22.Blasting
a. The applicant or argent shall distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for Massachusetts
Property Owners about Blasting" to all abutters within two hundred fifty (250) feet of
the blasting area.
23. Construction Traffic
a. With the exception of off-site improvements required as part of this decision, all
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within City
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning & Community Development prior to construction.
b. A construction traffic management plan and schedule shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning & Community Development for review and approval prior to
the start of construction.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 10 of 11
c. Any roadways, driveways, or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be
restored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. The Owner shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site, and
clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as necessary.
24.Progress Reports
a. Upon the request of the Planning Board, the owner shall submit reports of the
progress of the subdivision's completion.
25.Clerk of the Works
a. A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the expense of the applicant,
his successors or assigns, as it deemed necessary by the City Planner.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to
controlled construction, which requires oversight by licensed engineered and
architects. Accordingly it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the
Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site
improvements related to the project located within the public way, including all utility
connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the
expense associated with the Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of
hours and at a customary rate of service.
b. The applicant shall submit a construction plan to the City Planner each season, prior
to starting work.
c. The construction plan will be incorporated into the Clerk of the Works Task Order.
No work shall start prior to an approved task order for these services.
26.Utilities
a. The applicant shall have an engineer certify the utility plans for review by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building permit. The utility plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Office of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any
Building Permit.
b. All utilities shall be installed underground.
c. A plan for sidewalks shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to
the issuance of any Building Permit.
d. The applicant shall install concrete sidewalks with vertical granite curbing throughout
the subdivision, according to the approved plans.
e. Any utility installation for housing lots shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 11 of 11
27.As-built Plans
a. As-built plans and Street Acceptance Plans, stamped by a Registered Professional
Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community
Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of the final
Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets.
b. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format
suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of
the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets.
c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a
certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was
completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the
City Engineer prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the
subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets; as well as, any subsequent
requirements by the City Engineer.
28.Violations
a. Violation of any condition contained within this decision may result in revocation of
this permit by the Planning Board.
This endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing certification of the
City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that is such
appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the
owner's Certificate of Title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner
or applicant.
I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans are on file with the City Clerk and a
copy is on file with the Planning Board.
Sincerely,
L 1
Ben J. Anerson, Chair
Salem Planning Board
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 11 of 11
27.As-built Plans
a. As-built plans and Street Acceptance Plans, stamped by a Registered Professional
Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community
Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of the final
Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets.
b. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format
suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of
the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets. [
c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a J
certification signed anistamped by the design engineer, stating that the work--Avas_
completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the
City Engineer prior totthe issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy fol•-the
subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets; as well as, any subsequent
requirements by the CitfEngineer. -
28.Violations
a. Violation of any condition contained within this decision may result in revocation of
this permit by the Planning Board.
This endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing certification of the
City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that is such
appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the
owner's Certificate of Title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner
or applicant.
I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans are on file with the City Clerk and a
copy is on file with the Planning Board.
Sincerely,
i
JP_
�
Ben J. An erson, Chair
Salem Planning Board
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 5 of I 1
Cluster Special Permit. The easement documents shall allow for passive, non-
motorized recreation and shall empower the City at its discretion, to make
improvements to the trail system.
b. The open space shall be opened for public use upon the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the final dwelling or at such an earlier time as mutually agreed to by
the applicant and the Board.
10.Salem Conservation Commission
a. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work. -
11.Trails
a. Prior to the release of the-inal Certificate of Occupancy, the trail for the open space
will be laid, flagged and completed by the Owner. The path shall consist of woodchip
surface as it will have the-least impact on the natural setting.
b. Trail segments will be cleared by manual cutting of brush and tree saplings no greater
than a 3 inch caliper to facilitate passage. All materials cut or cleared shall be chipped
and left in place. No earthmoving, grading or mowing will occur. Small brush will-be
cut and dispersed into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles
or mechanical equipment (other than chippers, clippers, toppers, and small chain saws
for the clearing) will be employed.
c. Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the trailheads. Sign
design and proposed location shall be submitted for approval to the City Planner prior
to installation.
12.Safety Improvements
a. The applicant has agreed to paint a crosswalk which will lead from the end of the
sidewalk on the northeasterly side of Clark Avenue to the sidewalk on the
southwesterly side of Clark Avenue (which continues to the intersection with Clark
Street). The exact location shall be approved by the City's Police Safety Officer.
b. The applicant has also agreed to paint a center line on a portion of existing Clark
Avenue to guide motorists through the bend. The striping and signage shall be
installed as shown on the "Proposed Traffic Marking & Signage Plan", dated
February 1, 2016, prepared by Williams & Sparages.
c. The applicant has agreed to repair the sidewalk as needed at the northerly end of
Clark Avenue from the end of the existing granite curbing on Clark Avenue northerly
to the intersection of Clark Avenue and Clark Street.
d. The applicant shall work with the City and remove a the rock at I Clark Avenue and
realigning the fence impeding sight distance on Clark Avenue once the City obtains
approval from the private land owner.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 6 of 11
13.Board of Health
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Board of
Health.
b. The applicant shall provide the City Health Agent the name, address and telephone
number of the project manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the
construction of the project.
c. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency
Plan, no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible
for the site certifies that the soil and ground water on the entire site meets the DEP
standards for the proposed use.
d- ie developer shall adhere to the drainage plan as appro�-_Rby the City Engineer.
e. -The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area
prior to construction; demolition, and/or basting and shall send a copy of the
-exterminators invoice to the Health Agent.
f The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
g. The developer shall submit the City Health Agent a written plan for dust control and
street sweeping which will occur during construction.
h. The developer shall submit the City Health Agent a written plan for the containment
and removal or debris, vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material
generated during demolition and/or construction.
i. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for firefighting.
J. Noise levels from the resultant establishments generated by operations, including but
not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level
by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels at the property line.
k. The developer shall disclose in writing to the City Health Agent the origin of any fill
material needed for the project. .
1. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its
operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health.
in. The developer shall install grease traps, to contain grease in gray water, prior to
entering the city sewer system in developments with 10 or more units and in
compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer.
n. Radon mitigation systems shall be installed.
o. The final construction shall comply with all requirements of the Massachusetts State
Sanitary code.
p. The developer shall notify the City Health Agents when the project is complete for
final inspection and confirmation that the above conditions have been met.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 7 of 11
14.Drainage Infrastructure Improvements
a. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark
Avenue as depicted on the plan entitled "Proposed Drainage Improvement Plan in
Salem, MA" dated December 16, 2015, revised January 27, 2016, prepared by
Williams & Sparages. The drainage improvements shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, including temporary pavement of the trenches,
within ninety (90) days of work starting on the proposed subdivision site. Temporary
paving shall remain and be maintained by the applicant, until the proposed
subdivision is ready for final overlay at which time all final offsite overlay paving
will be performed in conjunction with the final overlay of the subdivision.
b. The pavement replacement program applied to Clark Avenue shallconsistof 1%
inches of oveFray paving per the limits of the Williams & Sparages plan referenced in
paragraph a.Zabove. _Final grading of the top mix shall promote stormwater
conveyance to the newly installed and existing drainage facilities on Clark Street and
not cause_ ani-issues with existing driveways. Pavement will-=take-place in
conjunction with the final overlay being performed within the Woodlands
Subdivision.
c. if deemed necessary, prior to beginning the drainage improvement work the applicant
shall file a Request for Determination of Applicability with the Saleur Conservation
Commission and a Notice of Intent.
15.Sewer
a. The applicant shall pay One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) to the City for
the performance of an Infiltration and Inflow Identification and Removal program for
the approximately 2,700 linear foot sewer system to which the proposed subdivision
shall discharge sewerage. This $100,000 payment equals a contribution of$3,846.15
per house in the proposed subdivision of 26 homes.
b. Payments by the applicant to the City shall be made in accordance with the following
schedule:
i. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first house
lot;
ii. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the eighth house
lot;
iii. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the sixteenth
house lot; and
iv. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the twenty-
fourth house lot.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 8 of 11
16. Fire Department
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Fire
Department, including temporary access during construction. ,
I
17. Building Inspector
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Building
Inspector.
18.Lighting
t
a. Street lighting shall be in conformances with the-plan dated August 17, 2015, and
revised September 4, 2015; November 10,TOf 5; December 7, 2015 and January 22, _
2016.
b. Street lighting installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Electrician.
Street lights shall be outfitted with LED—bulbs. The street lighting shall be the
— -- -responsibility of the Applicant until such time-as the City accepts the street. --
c. The Owner shall coordinate with the electric company and the City Electrician regarding
the installation of street lighting within the Subdivision.
19.Noise
a. HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further
mitigate noise emanating from HVAC units if the Board of Health receives any
complaints. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the guideline for reviewing such noise is
that the broadband sound level should not increase by more than 10 dB (A) above the
ambient levels measured at the property line.
b. The method of screening HVAC units shall be submitted to the City Planner for
review and approval prior to installation.
20.Pre-Construction Conference
a. Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivision, a pre-construction conference
shall be scheduled with the City Planner, the City Engineer (or his designee), the
Building Commissioner, the Health Agent, and any other departments that may be
necessary. The Owner shall submit a construction schedule at the time of the pre-
construction conference.
21.Construction Practices
a. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
i. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,
regulations, and ordinances of the City of Salem.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 9 of I I
ii. No work shall commence before 8:00 AM on weekdays and Saturdays. No
work shall continue beyond 5:00 PM. There shall be no work conducted on
Sundays or holidays. Inside work of a quite nature may be permitted at other
times.
iii. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday — Friday between 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. There shall be no drilling or blasting, or rock hammering on
Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance
with all local and state regulations.
iv. The pre-blast survey shall be extended to include the existing subsurface drain.
V. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of
_ - construction on abutters. Advanced notice shall-b—c--provided to all abutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of-construction.
vi. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they
do not leave direct and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the
site.
vii. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,
'- regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. --
viii. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site must be completely located
on the site.
ix. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be
submitted by the applicant to the Building Inspector for review and approval
prior to the issuance of a building permit. Including in this plan, but not
limited to, shall be information regarding how equipment will be stores, a
description of the construction staging areas and its location in relation to the
site, and where the construction employees will pack their vehicles.
22.Blasting
a. The applicant or argent shall distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for Massachusetts
Property Owners about Blasting" to all abutters within two hundred fifty (250) feet of
the blasting area.
23. Construction Traffic
a. With the exception of off-site improvements required as part of this decision, all
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within City
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning & Community Development prior to construction.
b. A construction traffic management plan and schedule shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning & Community Development for review and approval prior to
the start of construction.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016-page 10 of I I
c. Any roadways, driveways, or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be
restored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. The Owner shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site, and
clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as necessary.
24. Progress Reports
a. Upon the request of the Planning Board, the owner shall submit reports of the
progress of the subdivision's completion.
25.Clerk of the Works -
a. A Clerk of the Works shall be*.ovided by the City, at the expense of the applicant;-
his successors or assigns, as it deemed necessary by the City Planner-
Notwithstanding the foregoing,ttie parties-acknowledge the Project shall be subject to
controlled construction, which -requires oversight by licensed engineered and €
architects. Accordingly it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the- -
Applicant that the Clerk-of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civilfsite —
improvements related to the project located within the public way, including all utility
connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the
expense associated with the Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of -
hours and at a customary rate of service.
b. The applicant shall submit a construction plan to the City Planner each season, prior
to starting work.
c. The construction plan will be incorporated into the Clerk of the Works Task Order.
No work shall start prior to an approved task order for these services.
26.Utilities
a. The applicant shall have an engineer certify the utility plans for review by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building permit. The utility plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Office of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any
Building Permit.
b. All utilities shall be installed underground.
c. A plan for sidewalks shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to
the issuance of any Building Permit.
d. The applicant shall install concrete sidewalks with vertical granite curbing throughout
the subdivision, according to the approved plans.
e. Any utility installation for housing lots shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
DATE: June 21 , 2017
NOTICE OF PROJECT COMMENCEMENT
NOTICE TO ABUTTERS OF WOODLANDS SUBDIVISION,
CLARK AVE - SALEM, MASS.
Please be advised that the above referenced subdivision has started with
the initial activities to be as follows:
• Survey and Layout
• Mobilization of Equipment
• Select Clearing and Installation of Erosion Controls
During the upcoming weeks/months work will include:
• Land Clearing
• Stumping and Grubbing
• Bulk Excavation
• Drainage and Utility Installation
We are aware of the inconvenience caused by Construction Activity in
General and apologize in advance. Rest assured that we will do everything
possible to minimize the impact of our activities on your neighborhood,
while at the same time constructing the project in accordance to the
approved plans. If you have particular concerns that must be addressed,
please call the Meninno Construction Office at 781-581-5333.
Thank you in advance for your understanding and cooperation.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 4 of 1 I
The Owner shall either file a performance bond, a deposit of money or
negotiable securities, or a tri-party agreement in an amount determined by the
Board to be sufficient to cover the cost of all or any one phase of the sub-
division of the improvements. Surety, if filed or deposited, shall be approved
as to form and manner of execution by the City Solicitor and as to sureties by
the City Treasurer and shall be contingent on the construction of the roadway
through binder course. The amount of the surety shall be reasonably
determined by the Engineering Department.
The Owner may file a covenant to secure the construction of ways and
services for the entire sub-division and said covenant may be partially released
for phases of the sub-division by bond, surety or tri-party agreement being
filed any phase or phases of the subdivision.
ii. Timeframe —
If such-ways and services are not completed within two (2) years-of the date of
endorsement of the plan, approval of the plan may be rescinded unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Board. The Planning Board
ac a e lme ame and completion of the entire subdivision is
anticipated to be two years, and will not unreasonably withhold extensions.
8. Homeowner's Association
a. The Draft Home Owners Association Documents shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning and Community Development, for reasonable review as to
form and content prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for the
proposed dwellings. These documents shall include the following responsibilities:
i. Ownership and/or maintenance of the storm water management system;
ii. Ownership and/or maintenance of the trail system and open space (if the open
space and trail system are not to be owned by the City of Salem).
iii. Ownership and/or maintenance of walls located in the subdivision that are not
situated on the lots in the sub-division.
b. The City of Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Homeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
a. Open Space as shown on the Plans and consisting of approximately 1.95 acres shall
be perpetually preserved as open space. The Open Space shall be placed in a
corporation or trust owned or to be owned by the owners of lots within the
subdivision with provisions for limited easements for recreational use by residents of
the City of Salem; provided that such ownership shall vest the Board sufficient rights
to enforce compliance with restrictions imposed by the Board as a condition of its
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 3 of 11 i
i. Section IV A.4.a: Maximum Length of Dead-end Streets is waived to allow a
length of 1089.03 feet based on the requirement for the installation of sprinkler
systems in the dwellings.
ii. Section IV A.111: Minimum centerline radii of two hundred thirty feet for a
curved street.
iii. Section IV: Right of way improvements which require street trees to be 3.5
inches caliper, 30 feet on center, in place thereof allow 2 trees per lot.
iv. Section IV A.2.a.: Minimum width of sidewalk for a minor/deadend street 5
feet, in place thereof allow a 4 foot concrete sidewalk with a grass strip of no _
less than 3.5 feet on each side.
_ - b. In the judgment of the Planning Board "the granting of the above waivers is in the = -
public interest and consistent with thentent of the e subdivision control law.
6. Transfer of Ownership
a. Within five days of transfer of_ownership of the subdivision, the Owner shall notify
the Board in writing of the new owner's name and address. This shall not include the
sale of lots within the subdivision in the ordinary course of business, but only a sale
- of the entire subdivision. The terms, conditions, restrictions and/or requirements of
this decision shall be binding on the Owner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Security (Section III(B)(5) of the Subdivision Regulations)
a. Prior to the release of any lots for sale or building, the Planning Board shall require
that an acceptable form of surety is posted along with a proposed schedule of releases.
If partial release of surety is to be requested, the Planning Board may, at its discretion;
require deposits to be broken down in amounts of anticipated requests for release. The
applicant agrees to complete the required improvements in accordance with Section V
of the Subdivision Regulations for the subdivision. Such construction and installation
is to be secured by one and/or in part by the other of the following methods which
may from time to time be varied by the applicant with the reasonable approval of the
Planning Board.
b. Endorsement of Approval with Covenant
The Owner shall file a covenant, prior to endorsement by the Planning Board,
executed and to be duly recorded with the Subdivision Plans by the owner of
record, which instrument shall the land, and shall state such ways and services
shown on the approved plans dated August 17, 2015, and revised September 4,
2015; November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015 and January 22, 2016 shall be
provided to serve any and all lots before any lot may be built upon or
conveyed, other than by mortgage; and deed; and/or
i. Endorsement of Approval with Bonds, Surety or Tri-Party Agreement
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
-_ tolbFEB 22 P
CITY GLI_I:r;,
Form C—Decision
Definitive Subdivision Decision, Stormwater Permit, and Cluster Residential Development
Special Permit
Clark Avenue (Map 6 Lots 7, 8 and 9)
February 22, 201-6
Strafini, Darling and Correnti, LLP
C/o Attorney Correnti
-63-Federal Street —
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
RE: Decision of the Clark Avenue Subdivision—Form C (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9)
On September 17, 2015, the Salem Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for a proposal
submitted by NSD Realty Trust (hereafter referred to as "applicant') to allow the
construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots on Clark Avenue,
Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9. The public hearing for the Definitive Subdivision, Form
C and Cluster Residential Special Permit was continued to October 15, 2015. At the October
15, 2015, public hearing the Salem Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for the proposal
of a Stormwater Permit to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance greater than one
acre of land within the City of Salem for the subject subdivision. The Cluster Residential
Special Permit and Stormwater Permit were continued to the November 19, 2015, December
3, 2015, December 17, 2015, January 7, 2016, January 21, 2016, February 4, 2016, and
February 18, 2016.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 18, 2016, the public hearing
for the Form C-Definitive Subdivision, Cluster Residential Development Special Permit,
Stormwater was closed and the Board voted Seven (7) in favor, (Ben Anderson, Matt Veno,
Helen Sides, Kirt Rieder, Carole Hamilton, Dale Yale, and Noah Koretz) none opposed, to
approve the project. Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of the
Special Permits has been met by the Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose
and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and would not result in a net negative environmental
impact. The Board finds that the subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential
development because the plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance to protect and promote health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the
inhabitants of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. The Board
finds that the subdivision meets the purposes of residential development because it promotes
the more efficient use of land in harmony with existing natural features.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 2 of I 1
i
The Board recognized that the building lots created and the buildings to be constructed
thereon may have dimensional controls and density regulations varying from those otherwise
permitted by the ordinance or by-law and the approvals are subject to the allowing conditions
and waivers and/or relief:
1. Conformance with the Plan
a. Work shall conform to the set of plans containing sheets 1 through 11, entitled, "The
Woodlands", and prepared by Williams and Sparages, 189 North Main Street, Suite
101, Middleton, MA 01949, dated August 17, 2015, and revised September 4, 2015;
November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015; and January 22, 2016 and the landscaping
plans entitled, "Clark Avenue-Entry Perspective" and "Entry Planting Plan" meted
December 2, 2015 prepared by LeBlanc Jones Architects, Inc.
2. Endorsement of the Plans
a. Following the statutory twenty (20) day appeal period, the Planning Board will
endorse the original subdivision plans, subject to conditions of this decision, which
shall be recorded at the South Essex Registry of Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the
plans, the following items-must be submitted for approval by the Planning Board: --
i. A covenant to secure the construction of ways and installation of municipal
services, including required description of mortgages and assents of
mortgagees.
ii. Acceptable form of grants of easements, if applicable.
iii. This decision shall be referenced on the original plans prior to the endorsement
by the Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the
Essex South Registry of Deeds.
3. Amendments
a. Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the
Planning Board unless deemed insignificant by the City Planner. Any waiver of
conditions contained within this decision shall require approval of the Planning
Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
a. The Subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the
Subdivision Rules and Regulations and any other applicable regulations as affected
by this decision.
5. Waivers
a. In approving the Plans, the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the
Subdivision Rules and Regulations:
DATE: June 21 , 2017
NOTICE OF PROJECT COMMENCEMENT
NOTICE TO ABUTTERS OF WOODLANDS SUBDIVISION,
CLARK AVE - SALEM, MASS.
Please be advised that the above referenced subdivision has started with
the initial activities to be as follows:
• Survey and Layout
• Mobilization of Equipment
• Select Clearing and Installation of Erosion Controls
During the upcoming weeks/months work will include:
• Land Clearing
• Stumping and Grubbing
• Bulk Excavation
• Drainage and Utility Installation
We are aware of the inconvenience caused by Construction Activity in
General and apologize in advance. Rest assured that we will do everything
possible to minimize the impact of our activities on your neighborhood,
while at the same time constructing the project in accordance to the
approved plans. If you have particular concerns that must be addressed,
please call the Meninno Construction Office at 781-581-5333.
Thank you in advance for your understanding and cooperation.
A NOTE 4 STANRDHYDRANT TO NEU CITY OF
CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK TO BE USED ONLY WHERE IT SALEM
BRICK SHELF WNL OF MANHOLE WILL BUR ON UNDISTURBED EARTH. PUMPER CONNECTION
SLOPE 1'/II USE RESTRAINED JOINT RTTINGS (MEGNUG OR BRFAKawar MNCE
VERTICAL GR%NITE C
GRADE FACES ROAD
CURD, TYPE YBS UNPROVED BLE, WHERE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS
BINDER COURSE SIZE O BLOC O
B FLo% B TOP COURSE T_ TIMESONORM&OPERATI GK OR LUG TO BE PRESSURE. FOR L5 SIDEWALK
6' EDGESTONE
— - VARIES FINISHED STREET GRADE
BASE COURSE 6 V-6
MIR =e" '
PIPE PIPE CRUSHED STONE CEMENT SA E.STANDARD
ETE SADDLE VALVE BOX AND COVER !
.. ATABLE UNDER
GRAVEL 1N Ma OF THE ACCESS TUBE ! F'
o BRICKS ON OT STANDARD
EWE (2X0 EXPOSED) CIIRS I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
LL J 0 MIL POLY OVER STONE WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
MASONRY RMC 0p THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
BRICK CHANNEL MPLIES
TO DROP CONNECTION'S AS VERTICAL GRANITE CURB DETAIL THRUST BLOCK WATERLHFIN .. PREPARING THIS PIAN.
WELL AS CONVENTIONAL. (NOT TO CGDE)
1----�A _ 6-LATE VALVE 6 CLOT __ _ ___ __
WATER MAIN �-•� IF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS WILLIAM$ & SPARAGES LLC
PLAN — — -- — `j—\\\T USED, DO NOT BLANK CHAIN
SXEIF ELEVATION SVAE AS `PRONDE N CUBIC YARD OF
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE.
ANCHORING TEL SELECTED 2'STONE -TO 6"
SLOEP t R
/
Y RAM BRAIN
WUNDISTURBEDEARTH I 6-INCH THICK ABOVE N 0MECHAN CPL JOIMS CONCRE 12 SE LAND BYWALL OF MANHOLE CONCRETE BASE UGEF HYDRAM TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT CITY OF SALEM
BRICK OR CONCRETE HCL. PIANNING BOARD
CONNECTION FOR HIGH6'MINIMUM - OR LOW SERVICE LINEDETAIL
12' MINIMUM SCREENED (NOT'O SCALE)
GFAVEL BASE,BRICK ON EDGE _
BITUMINOUS GONG TOP
SECTION A-A 6-HIGH CHECK DAM WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN COURSE AS SPECIFIED SAW UT EXISTING PPVEMENT,
DIT. GONG. BINDER APPLY TACK COAT
CONCRETE COIIAR _ COURSE aS SPECIiIEO
MANHOLE FRAME AND +\\_K_ \"� GRAVEL BASE AS SPECIHED� -------
1-2"
--- ------_
_ 12' _ `� EXISTING PAVEMENT
CANER AS SPECIFIED 8" J6 <\ 1 2'CRUSHED ' COMPACTED SUBGRADE�
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE OR \ \\% EXISTING BASE
FINISHED GRADE S(o4�\ STONE i --- ----------
Af eLO
BRICK FOR GRADE "
ADJUSTMENTY'-
-— — —PRECAST TRANSITION SECTION VARIES (SEE PLAN) 1'41MIN. -- _----
OR BARREL SECTION WITH
PRECAST TOP SUB _
00 '`: GRASSED SWALE PAVEMENT MATCH DTE
.I
OR PREFORMED FFLE IxIBB KET (Mar TO scALD) DETAIL
<'-D' UNLESS OTHERWISE- JOINT SEALANT AS SPECIFIED (NOT i0 SCALE)
INDI'TEO ON DRAWINGS
MANHOLE RUNGS MULTIPLES OF 1%2',3;4'.5',
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PUN
OR 6' LENGTHS AS REQUIRED
RLTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED OAfr. -
B' MINIMUM
STET PIPE CONNECTION I, CLERK OF THE CION OF THIS P N
SHELF ELEVATION SAME AS DETAILS THIS SHEET HEREBY PLANNING
THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE.
THE PUYNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECENED AND RECORDED AT TXIs
6' MINIMUM OFFICE THAT NO APPEAL WAS O WRING THE TWENTY DAYS NEXTEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT ANDD RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE
_ .
I I
IY MINIMUM
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM S1AB SCREENED GRAVEL
SI-ALL NOT BE LESS THAN
THE MANHOLE fl^RREL I�
SECTION WALL OR TOP SI-AB BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL. V `WOOD POST T Ren�m cAYWWWA 12/0212015
WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 2 Na tlun9esw Nis sten IIPOR015
SECTION B-B ANS F�T SE's 6 PLJOR m ON ME CONITURI 0e19Is 9I
UNDISTURBED EARTH PRENIOUAY LAID 84E N0 AEVBYJN DATE
PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE 2-REI STEEL - FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED DETAIL SHEET oArz
DETAIL &RcrosTAxa+� m�' 1 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
(NOT TO SCALE)
.- ANCHOR FABRIC WITH
m SOIL. TAMv OACKFILL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
EXISTING ROU SA4 q�DRISCOLL ET AL
a SURFACE DIRECTION OF FLOW 16 WALIALE ROAD
E �(B( �y„ya LYNN. M,01901 r,C
LC CORTS 36055.36056.36057 WMLIAMS
CARC
INTO FRENCH NSD R
FABRIC DOWN _ 16 n )WIPLICANT,
TRUST '1
- x 1-r cfluSHEo SPAR_AGF$
Opf NN STONE - L NH.MAL 01905E T 189 NcerK MAIN STRFsi
FLOW 1j e'L 6"MIN. 8000 GOSrS PR T O S , .101
6OOL D C. MAX. XAL W. CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MD)gETON.W019A9
d 1LR Y�0£ dGCF[GORS REFERENCE: S" WRONB 61Ye1..e-sore
F.VL'19ie)Sl9-e20D
i\�\ \\1��\i\`!+ \\\i. \1\! .i1i\\ ✓�\\�. 111/.1\\.i1i\\1- RcsTFlt..n. Q MRP 6 PANELS J, B E 9
STONE CHECK DAM TEMPORARY HAYBALE SILTFENCE ° " SCALE NOT TO ffALE DETAIL SHEET10F4
Er (NOT TD SCALE) DETAIL DETAIL
(NOT '0 SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) L S "GUST 14.2015 SHEET 8 OF 1 1
s
cx c
_
IN EFER e: ____ � GRa
-8 C MORTAR I—
DO'ERE
rG 3E 5 L AKE9 °RO L GRA. <.R5 .IeN:a J RI. 0 P 0 D �-]} __ .Aa53 3.5E uATEI.ciEA-e s:; a: 2„PEn%esr-oi a n5 m L.,m. MN IBIE.CONC.1BINOEFMPwLY V0(DOMEImw EMEM. :nu.eau EL:mrERo, u_[u. p C SDE GF PF (MATCH E%120N0j E V1 GRAVEL SSE AS SPECIFIED--
Au i . a� � d ,.�h .,"ti
I cry�. R x9 n _ .
,D _1 ,l * -113 .RE v�o cu L 'I-"-- x=.I f ./s^ — -E' .. _ VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 =200'
ORE�'«.. 'E DRbn' -S•. C l A'.r... (SOURCE:SALEM GIS)
RI:JG a.Ee2.0 i 9rkn.. k
.c..._ S:E.tiJ!E
PRECAST SHALLOW DRAIN MANHOLE PRECAST SHALLOW CATCH BASIN PAVEMENT MATCH ,.A --5 c —1-
C 1CN C G'LD—",—EN..F _ TIS::_EINE.. _E.
DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL NOT.
OGE
^, GR E 'ELI,cON DN
.,; __, E.
,—SA"`—AE P'IF- G 12'/30:E IC:a...
TRENCH DETAIL FOR
GRAVITY PIPE
I`n_coa°PIS -
I
II ,
.I .
4=7
Fie l,
l-7 FSi`1
.P I b AIYCUT PA
'I
j( "I'. ky>i i PCEROEP Y sE wHloop \ B F! L 2 i(AFsAi. CB 12-9•_IXILCRF.II43 X IN0.58
nAM.
x HERE ryIla] fREPAR
ra.1V,5
;
'
BITUMINOUS SIDEtIAIK -PROP FY NERF
].51
CB HOP 190 9 V58 INV�114.40 IMC CB
i t2 WE lery-+I>.o ]" E_VAT. _i'� k ORN ECESSPR" AS
A. •REPLACE sfCIKK1 oP 3°PERU _ NECESSARY
T.
5_..,_�
S
I 1
..
E.L.+
_ .. . .5� nca
II ,
C,NPEEEE
ri e
A..z •
I
1 1 I
i
L GEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS P,n:u ry r A.w A y ,o
A..,i a:NC MF'_ E.Ri AL A.G. 5.55 ..:-E LF RNNA.E,MRVE �.:: LGG�51M '� UVE PROPOSED DRAINAGE
S EM. AS Ca E..:.NURT' 2. GE'rpEC i .. FESP-AS . 204,3"EASY.am IAND
TIE
T M': Y SU nY 9 `'
"I IFa GSE. R :. 2M, A _MNEG ...FGR.. w ,DDG w4SNPROVEMENT PLAN
C A C PURE ' i G S N CEu E -
HARD
PIT
R\E - LF DECt� M
ucN oRaa; DEC 1 :
3 N n R C W ,A 0 RES A JC Al ll. RJP+`S GAI'.A E
""°'i °''" R 5 5 ' ' t P OUR: c, DEPT,OF PLANNING&
SALEM, MA
A TIE GMP O'0 NA: .1 BEEPOIRELI FOR 1E1Ay1I. J r O r Ir IND
- + �- E EVATON G ALL x T. J r s SG ry a G c Es n. A ;�' ,�+,''ttv .� OOMMLImTY DEVELOPMENT
_ (:.SiR i ENGINEER 54A N..I.
WI-11O „E e ! t- ;.. t Rf:C. Y 0' 10' 20 40'
.Rz A...-:ELF Li' -,E.(SOROS.. -PNS:__O1+AN. PR. ad a u.ER',k.Ac C 15 .,5_.R.,_FC �e V.Erl TIE SCALE:1'n 20' DATE:DECEMBER 16,2015
N:RY OMRaC P Is REs {LE TOR Od"4' a n,,.OWE\ vER -SOO R AiE)FRIER
,.E '.R IdRNN`OLE -'+Tti R .7 COIRU-101, ^
Ppa, ,. ,c G _.=REs+s .*I�:>Ezs e.�M_r. ARE :.._ HEAT.A GIeD_ _ — _ CLARK STREET/CLARK AVENUE INTERSECTION
c. ,
4
i
5 tiL - _ Li 'H. L ES 5N0'.' RE BASED U FOL^ R AEC,
9 A A- i GUGti i-E
L I V
"1 M1 4 N E ROSE, C R,,0 G a\ ..5 i R -..(.1I_ JF A'. +:
1
EIIS1 NI' CRITCaR EIISTI.11DENClF.1.1 TOTTER IRIEEIT,PRISE11EE ARE 10TAa W:...E _- \ 27
\' A
OP 5 L G;:R _}�� ] E PRO U DW II A :2 M L.a Y PJ 1 P ( E1 i 'L WILLIAMSG S C A ISE : C E PLAN
' J
-EOE ._d.�5 9 J CPE AL G5 ,"._5 5 p. ' r.::c�.p )/Y'/� V €R. SPARAGES
a SERV BR SA-EI J' e.,NES 111 All CMR G IRON llT a L 'e A$ _L_A.7NL i C 'L J� pp rtu vv+m unman
3 J 9 J _- e 5 550 5 GRM4 C WC 51 Lp 9F[Cl p 4 E _3� I 'i + .( RIR MAIN STREET
�i. 9 N°01
= 1G. L. __ OF EW.Kc At U_AND ClivE E:PE-I A .5 Sr', 1 4hv 'vF_.aN:'S9-D. d' , MI
MIo LETON,MAO)919
PROP '" A PNON..........
BO',
(O FAxa9]RI539-REO
J W1W1.1YSENLINfERS.COM
Y
1PCEu�iIHLS WN[aE OPER NL'.xR
%µ A.Sxpvm Ox P1µ
1
11 f 40' LAYOUT _PAVEMENT TYPICAL H2O INSPECTION PORT DETAIL
N
6• 6•SCN IOPVCOR FLCOR aOXFRAAIEAXDLIO
20' PgvEMEM 2 'I SIDE- SO"
pyC rypE NEEWJI R�]SOa OR EIXYI
L SIDEK 2I" SQUARE CLOSURE
SCREW IID
E P T1 PAVEMENT
CLASS"C'CONCRE ID'
y--PAVEMENT aUB8A5E �� n III COMPACTED FELL
VERTICAL GRANRE I` My} XVLV FLiA85%COMPACIm FLL o
FOOT CURBING I 3/8_ .2;� FEED CONNECTOR
ip
F�°� AG2 TICN.WOVEN F61FI1 FABRIC
3/e: FOOT 3/8•: FOOT, z.A 6•Mw DEPM ARWXDa50NE TOPARBS•DES
MANDATORY:BOTTOM PER ENGINEER•' z
00 'W} OF t3 pCX DESIGN PREFERENCE,
u, 00 WASHEDGRUSNED ps 1 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
6'LOAM iw O E I3w COEUCC
NDUITS SIO"EASKI D=� WITH THE RULES AND REGUUTIONS
k SEED CAS. O µDBFl°W CLLlEC N1 N4PClYET'MFNE asp OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
�"4La 13 DRAM �a� SIDEMM ON °WWBFAS HNERABOVESTOMEBISEAND ¢
BOTH SIDES O O O BENEATH RECRARGERS]OMLXD PREPARING THIS PCW.
'PE 1-1 0 S' DAN. PVC 1' TOP Mix NFAW pUiYCHMIFLONGE W
BNUMINOVS GRAVTI'SEWER V2'BINDER FORTALa W1BiRE 11DL0NO I - 31".DIA. WASHED. ______
CONCRETE 8 DIAM. 12•GRAKL PB£PER IMIERIIKMIWIFIXD SURROUNDING CRUSHECDNAMOER
1 1/Y TOP MIX GL.01. WATER ENGMEERDESCR NF/AWCGDOn CMNA wDn ND TON WILLIAM$ & SPARAGES LLC
ANO I"SPEMOL PORI
2 1/2'fiINDEft (NA%INIET= ASSEMBLY FROM
12'GRAVEL WE 2A INCNE51 1-21NgI WAS1@DCM5XE0 BOTTOM TO Fl"AL ELEVATION
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION AROUNDCHAMBERB _ (THIS CHAMBER ONLY)
(wl TO swi) - A0.G11HD CHNABERBEO
TrncAL wETEcclw®ER
A B WSNECnow PORT 6•unEIWAL CW0.WD
CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY PLAN VIEW
r----"- --------- --------
rl ! NOTE: THE CULTEC MODEL SHOWN HERE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE
EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
s-D' s'-D' cIRTEc nD mLPxvETHYIEXB Iamiro
�n Lei �J ' t-ZINCH.WASERIX PAVEMENT BE PLACED SEARMTH
CRUSXFDSTPIE g% A OZ NONVIOVII2 FILTER FABRIC irvtV FCN F1:EDCIXINFCTCTL9
• 31'gA GAIECRECHVIGFA3wKL LA0 GOMPACIED FALL NUTULND RISCOMPACTEDIFLL 1-31RCN0 IOAGGGDARCEIWENICP N2DSIOFSIC
• AXWI e . ; HFAW DUIYLMMI6FR S AAwXD STORE INTERNAL MMIFOIO �WASI®M YAVWTLRV.
(3 RAGP5) FBWRWN III MID
. -.ry .. ry y * tO.R Md. XFA'W OU11'PW.ISER GRACE
610NE® WMEREaPECIFIFOCdMECTIXt 'w'S "MIN.
PLW MEW 8.0.11a3mm)MM. - -
A B ISR MBammI
ASI BPtIST-111AlN
121wSB mml ws mamM
EAIFMD AfFF Ps To F,XISX tltADE MA%
. IaPMDBnmI
ABI
Y mW BP 1152 mmINIX. tP BOSS-1 0mm1 wsms
ENGINEER
E.XNGEXWT O'E..PUT RPE KIN E'E
Ira) ( ) lI-
I— Y •13 BM NORE• IERCULTECNO Z1REENTRIEWINE SmE1.0 AUOBEwi t2?19Mmm1
WEx NL 3W D9CNF8) LdERTOSPMTIE ENRRE WIOIX B224FEED NIGWHKV RYP.) „ n •,•t SP I'm mmIMM.
OFTNESVSTEMBELPNTNERYLV FPb CG OOgEC1OR
FGN FEFOCONNECTgL4MD AS HEELED
SIDE PoRTMB .aL
LCULTEC INTERNAL MANIFOLD DETAIL P SBR ItA mml S D WZ+m
"SECNN MFIMORRIS
NOES MLREC�ER]TMIO)XGW WfY WRRIAEMVtt
p[CNA®Egy1pY XOeYOLTEC.NFDFNICd5IE1D.Ci. WRXANIMBIIWEFMWEDMOIME METAtW9 THE
XDTES: 9TOIVfiE PFP'FfD�tlY1CBFTPFR 0E5g11M,T. 1gIGTX BETEL..
PFFERm C1AtEC.WCSCNWB1igECCM'BQ9 Au,Et7WNf]1..CNN10E09MIIBTOEO6lM .
I ORNCPEIE:5...1 REEUM MER 2.an. ttN.LPR Nx16Y1C61£4
w
AvuIABLE IN X-,D n-zD IDWxcA
C51LxCD FOR : 150 .1..1 .11HJ'wNl. UBEBEGIItl'iER50D%LXoxEAW DUTYFDRTENERI
z.oILCCRDVIB NTTMALLIPRIWLELIXM1 eTATEAM
ROMRWATKICt FECFAMREGULA W.
s.TMLUE ANo GGCYTS.1 SEHE11.&Rn RERE.
CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVYDUTY TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SEDIMENT AND OIL SEPARATOR FINISHED GRADE
TOP OF '_5:1 CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PV.N
DETAIL UNPAVED PAVED SLOPE -2:1 SLOPE DATE' -----------
(NOT i0 SCALE) E%ISDSU GROUND - CITY OF SALEM
SURFACE FEAT STONES PLANNING BOARD L CLERK OF THE CItt OF SAIS P N
FOR WALL LINE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE Of LVEDAPPROI OF THIS PV." RY
CONFIGURATION ME PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED MD RECORDED N THIS
PRUNE AS FIELD PgNNG MD SUB-BASE MATERIAE - - �'° --- ----------- OFFICE MO THAT SUCH
APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENtt
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT RE RECORDING OF HE NOTICE.
DIRECTED BY OWNER TO _
z
IMPROVE APPENI COMMON FILL MATERIPL `
CRETAN NORMAL TREE ---- ----�
SHAPE) COMMON FILL MATERIAL 1.5 CITY CLERK
MAX, SLOPE
TRUNK FLARE 1 , -
JUNCnON: PLANT TREE WARNING TAPE FILTER ---- --------
1-2'MOVE EXISTING FABRIC A
9aaJ 3 her mlEw<onlnle,b 12,01/2015
d GRADE J JOINTS No[InlgnbMh ellen 111HUZ15
^_ 3' DYER SHREDDED FEE ,: }; PERPENOICUAR ----- 1 MAI 91412015
BARK MULCH i0 i0 TO SLOPE
OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER MEVBFJ" T DATE
KEEP MULCH 2-FROM DETAIL SHEET
1
o
TRUNK
MIN. RGULDER
EXISTING GRADE 12 MINIMUM SEE GRORIGI
GUNp OR SIZE 500LB ------------------- "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
B' MIN CLDII NOTE I BELOW
_w
CUT MD REMOVE BURLAP IN SCREENED GRAVEL COMPACTED 'I SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
FROM TOP 1/3 OF • FILL PROPOSED ____ ______
ROOT HALL. IF 9CREENEO GRAVEL PLACED AGAINST CflU5NE0 `� GRADE
NONBIODEGRADABLE. UNDISTURBED SIDES MD BOTTOM OF ONE
OWNER
z - REMOVE COMPLETELY. TRENCH. SEE NOTE I BARBARA DRISCOL ET AL
SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE SEWER OR DRAIN S" MIN SCREENED GRAVEL BEDDING — — IB WALUCE ROAD
BACKFILL AS PER BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE, LYNN, 01901
SPECIFICATION 12 MINIMCM DATE: - _______ LC CERTS J6055,36056,360A APPLICANT C(S WILLIAMS
t t UNDISTURBED EARTH NSD BMW TRUST SPARAGES
iii DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW
THREE TRIES WIDTH OF RDOTBALL ROOTEALL NOTES - ]S 01 STREET
�•" LYNN. MA 01905 159NDRMx STREET
MM
T FOR PIPES OTHER THAN PVC. SELECTED COMMON FILL MAY BE USED FROM PERFORATED UNDERD.WN 75% OF RASE SFK PRa DAL-C-I�S ' SNIE 101
MID-OMMETER OF PIPE TO 12'ABODE TOP OF PIPE T° DISCHARGE TO "DAYL'.C1R'AT ROCKS TO BE WOFHyN CWtK AVENUE SALEM, MA �` MIWIFTOH.MAOI9ES
DECIDUOUS TREE IRTFflVALS NO GREATER LHAN 30 IO°0 LBS OR NOR d «R RS R F R NC ' J ENT.q]REED ORIII0p
PLANTING TRENCH DETAIL FOR PLAIN FOR EOGT1°":) GR ER .' M P a PMEEs ]. B A 9
DETAIL GRAVITY PIPE ""' SCALE:NOT TO SCALE DETAIL SHEET20F4
(NOT TO sa'_E) (NOT To SCALE) RIP—RAP DETAIL /X SHEET 9 OF 11
X. (NOT TO SCALE) 1 AUGIJT 14.2015
6 B uCginP X YNpPt R M COHRs .CGHRS gtnLY 4MVN0.E CBKM MEM
EL
BEP USA r0 TARRNAII A. 9JPPUE I TO HmNM fAKKS MD YWrM xH PIuS�E suWHER 10 PRMBE E..MV uCMTM SVPA+W�B PREMIER ®GXs ARM LAW TAR Wu9., . 6 p�RLTO
WAC:A6 NIR xNI LR4x5 N,.% Tµ QIBADE UINIB 151443 -INCH FLAT TEP AB LO uANE N 10 BE L.10 MARE 1 TEE M
..m.1 AH PEAK MMEMANIs COHRs ro suPPgtT Ax W+M/A.Vs1YEN15 COHRs TO P xo LNNAA H-K Low x xB LBM c - LOM
.1 INT Ef 9nrtL[AT
EEr TOP OF BNRE AT SEI TM O'BATTLE AT LAE TCP Cf RMRE AL
flEV.,ly rpILLI TP 7i'+O
.1C IflNOR I.—Ill.YR e,00 M SrgM I.M SRpu _ , .11L,RTA O 1.
e A m
TLv-,2[
PEAK
PAUT NK NUET NNE INLET FEE T'I PIPE
1.
YLE.5 , _ YLEHL _ O 9 _ Y O„S.S „
xT,LIPAPW BA9x, AP RICK p -LAET RE ELL MMCWVONETA,CF AllOx RANK AP R. PAx6 wM W¢PREEIh =T AKN 9AEw] M PW. PMA wM tltlPiGE NFUNNATON EARN♦ TRAP ROCP pAx•y xM MC'Nh
AE
wriLE"T°PYEE xO 11 NINE
AMX u'Tx1Iir0°RPPE vPF IIIE
,LAIN
N-131 o w 7, as9Er -
arse aP vITE e a e. wrsmE R o PPE e — 19cIEE.WPA:PE
,rnxlWu r CIEMMR .z ,rYimYW .]MHFANNMCE 12 N„04 11uuII��IIII��''�uI .z CE
PCACFNA WAVEY �-H SCT[[XA OInHt "W'"lO WAVEI _ LAX LRAHL = � �UHpPNRBA EMM
NdSNPoA EMM UMMIURBEB EMM OiSNRBfO EMM
SECTIM SECTOR SECTION SECTION
UH
(x)xOm'"IiENCUrtRs 01 xwi mvEls . ai K. MANIPLE arvERA
%�I I`♦\ i�I I�\\ i�I I`♦♦ �ill I`�♦
I I
I I \ / I I \
AK
.R PRO
IORA PPEr aHAL< �� IKKRAI noEl I- 1� DRAIN
01FINE
1,Ei mLr oRuxl IOPAIX u
PI ET
♦ ij ♦ `j ♦ `j ♦ `j i
` PoKCASi CATp BnSp ` MECAST CAIW EARN ` PISCMr LnTW BA4x ` PPC[ASL CAip BA9x
PI AN PLAN PIAN P1BN
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
INFILTRATION BASIN 1 INFILTRATION BASIN 2 INFILTRATION BASIN 3 INFILTRATION BASIN 4
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCKE) (NOT TO SCALE)
a"
CITY IN SALEM
DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL
Exlsnnc cRaDE P(ANwG BOARD
DETAIL ___ _
(NOT TO LL
DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL urvolsro,BCO j\�j\��\�j\�j�j`�
REMOVE 6-of EXISTING solL
POST TOP LAMP ARH CRUSHEACE W/3 MINUS ---— -— __---
BR. SIDEWALK USABLE SIDEWALK WIDTH PER AM IS NOT TO BE DETAIL TRAIL DETAIL
GRAVEL ONE
LESS THAN 1'-0 OADWAY (NOT TO SCAlE)
ED. k SEED NOTE. (NOT TO SCALE)
•`, . ���/��� DETECTABLE WARNING PANELS ARE REQUIRED 3- 3.0.0. ---------------
�% ON ALL PROPOSED WHEELCHAIR RAMPS TO BE
• \ INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION 6.25"DIA.
3/9' DIA. HOLE 1/2"
STANDARD MA 107.6.5R (DECEMBER 2GO ) TYPICAL INSTALLATION 'n
��
DEEP AT ACTUAL PANELS MAY BE CONCRETE PRECAST OR
REFERENCE CAST IN PI-ACE OR OTHER SUITABLE
REFS OF SUaV1Y
84\ MATERIAL PERMANENTLY APPLIED TO ME
_ \ RAMP. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES
48 SHALL CONTRAST NSUALLY WITH ADJACENT TL )I • 5UA 10 60x Ox. _ '
WALKING SURFACES EITHER LIGHT-ON-DARK, v
OR DARK-ON-LIGHT B�AS'I
Cf Ong
V
/\ u I�I W '.III 27.75"
I,I �• \/� ///�/. O �— J \ON._,a' ILII
---
SECTION A-A oE
(I III
O I
DATE:
LAYOUT
3� 7 %,
UNE
III n.25"
3 Pttr rtNew mmmenh I2/07/2015
GRANITE BOUND SIDIEN. R BLE Z VAR CE k III IaS- x MR< 9 muH: l I'l."DBIs
DETAIL 7,5X• MAY 7.5x• M%
1 Ceulls 9p/2o15
y III III 7.0•DIA. N0. REV61p+ W1F
(NOT TO SCALE) 19.0
YEVEL LANDING" I,,� DETAIL SHEET
`Z GRASS PLOT Z 1.5X1 CROSS SLOPE I
TOWARD STREET FOR % I (�\ ACORN POST TBP-TYPE UMP AS 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVSION
ORNWE /I 1\1 MANUFACTURED BY COOPER LIGHTING, INC. OR
MEET PROPOSED RAMP
2z" (� ) EQUAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
GRADE AT END CF CURB 'Z III
GRASS PLOT Z PRpPoLAMP MP TYPE = HIGH PRESSURE - fig:
SODIUM (HPE) BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
18. ROAD
°OrOO°OO GR.WITE NRB EDGE OF ROADMAT PROPOSED UMP WATTAGE _ ,50 LC CERTN. MAS 36055,36056,3609 WILLIAMS iA1.Rc
fi•REVEAL A?ENp 6"REVEPL I 20" � SPARAG1S
07901
C151RIBUTION TYPE HI INTERNAL REFRACTOR NS REALTY
mel SPARAGES
PLAIN CEMENT CONCRETE MMP
NS REALTY TRUST
s'-o-MIN zv•LEVEL LANDING' WITH COMPOSITE LIGHT POLE 76 N. MALLE STREET
LYNN, MA 01905
REFERENCE DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL , IB9NIR ST9IIT
POINT
L5% • SLOPE FOR DRAWS SUL PROJECT LOCUS: BWm101
CERTIFY THAT HAVE CONFORMED DETAIL ry- CIPRK AVENUE S^LEM, M 41Bq£lOLIANOUP,
WITH THE RULES AND REGUUTIONS (NOT t0 SCALE) W AGGFGMRS RFLAt F: S RML(IIWHENNEI 93��BB
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN WHEELCHAIR RAMP (WGR) Rusoni+R MAv 6 PARELs 7.a A 9
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE SHALL
PREPARING 1X15 PUN. BE A DURABLE FIBERGLASS REINFORCED COMPOSITE RUTED-ME AS MANUFACTUREDRa
DETAIL BY SHAKESPEARE. 'WASHINGTON STYLE" WITH A 20"ANCHOR WE uh P •' DETAIL SHEET 4 OF 4
- (NOT TO SCALE) NOTES_ NOTE:TH5 MODEL MAY BE SUBSUMED WITH A CITY OF SALEM APPROVED EOUNALENT P SCALE NOT TO SCALE
• CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE t0.5S
WILLIAMS-kc SPARAGES LLC AUGUST 11,2015 SHEET 11 OF 11
a
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FRAME @ CAALE FINISHED GRADEA
@ GRATE
FINISHED GRADE OR FINISHED GRACE FINI91E0 CMDF
B MORTAR ..ST.
MANHOLE FRAME AND BRILNS PNO MORTAR
COVER AS SPECIFIED To BE u$D TO HAKE OR'
AND NO TAN
I'. 1=1111 �-III-Ii —III— d MIN, YIN,B"ML DCV GRADE AOJUSTMEHiS SLPPL EP i0 PRONDF USED i0 MAKE
CONCRETE COLLAR w A 10'OPENING E ADASWExTS
Et
KEPH0.E to BE 2 Cry COLSRS O
PRECAST IN RISER SLPPpi An X-24 BRICK FOR GRACE SECTMCOMMON FILL MATERIAL 6"OVERLAP ADJUSTMENT PRECAST TRANSITION CONICAL SEttE TO BE
SECT OR BARREL <B'31'WAMERR ST IN RISER_ SECT WITH PRECST PoEEP SE[TOxTOP SIABRUBBER '0"RINGED
GEOTEXIItE FABRIC CASKET OR PRE-
(INR) lk a NORX.LL INDUDE OF PIPE
2. FORUEO FLEXIBLE WAERJOINT SFiWNT �,EL2'CI£ARANLE RISER YCWAS D FUNVCATCH BASIN TRAPWp5ME0 GRAVEL OUTUDE Oi PIPE
MANHOLE RUNGS 2'UEARANCE
MUL'PLE$ OF BASE$ELTGry 1.236,5 OR 6 FT
LENGTHS AS REO'D
4"PERF. CORR, HOPE r 3- d'-0' UNLESS OTHERWISECATCX BASIN TRAP
(ROLES FACING UP) INDICATED ON DRAWINGSBAII SEL
�UNOISTURSED EARTH ___ _----_
FOUNDATION - - SCCREENEDGRA4EL a I ��UNDISTURBED EARTH
UNDERDRAIN --- ----- : :_ , :. •, , ;
DETAIL MINIMUM SCREENED GRI PRECAST DOUBLE-GRATE CATCH BASIN
- (NOT TO SCALE) Ir XONED UNO ..SED EARTH
/1 DETAIL SCREEXEO`"""`
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM AN �P MINIMUM CONCRETE FILL (NOT LE SCALE)
THEE NOTE LESS THAN DOUBLE GRATE PRECAST CATCH BASIN
THE MANHOLE BARREL DETAIL
SECTION WKU
L OR TOP SB
WXICHEVEft IS GREATER UNDISTURBED EARTH (NOT TO SCALE)
FRAME SINGLE CRATE
PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE LIMBO STRAPS
DETAIL BATE
(NOT TO SCFE)
CITY OF SALEM
-"Dwpr SARK' PLANNING BOARD
WSTAUED 81NE DEBATE AND FRNJE
CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
--------- WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
PREPARING T115 PVN.
PIAN
--------------- WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
SECTION CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PIAN
RATE, GMTE LAKING STRAP
SECTION CATCH Ri51x ORATE
6 0' I, CLERK OF THE Cltt OF SALEM. DO - iROME LGAUR ABNE THE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPRONAL OF THIS PUN BI LOWER STRAPS AHO -------------------
2-0-
_________________
6' 0' BELDAM TBE LIKING
3-0' 2' 0' 2'-0" THE PUNNING BOARD WS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS STRA^5,
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECENED DURING THE 1WENIY ! p'
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. ---- ----
I • LOwFR STRIP
Cltt CLERK
ro.xpY T TRA __—
DOGALSAGRAXNT TRAP DR
OPEN INUET SECTIXAMON
EUIML
CURB INIET SECTpN OPER THROAT CRATIRT
CURD INLET SECTION ---- ---�
ELEVATON
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP DATE:
— -- -
PRECAST DETAIL
CATCH PRECAST (NOT TO SCALE)
BASIN CAtOH Nates: a
SECTION BASIN 1) To De Plncetl in the eab6ng mtex Eosine located in CIOM< Avenue Pno•m the stmt of c nelmclion.
A-A• OPEN THROAT GRANITE SECTION 2)To he E ced in the PmWsed catch ERMeA a xhoin immediately Otte'installation to Piewnt sediment
CURB INLET SOME, q-A T'om'eocNin9 the slwmvole'management A"... T M'Iew�,mTm[ML I2/07/2013
PLAN : Xa<MnpurodtlLxhN 11/10/2015
3 FLANGE CATCH RAN ESTATE ELSE I DeWM 9/4/2015
AND CASCADE GRAB LEBANON RATE
U
K'
OR APPOROKD EOUE DID.MRMT 4RWNf NO. REV610X
10' O Low PORTS USE IF2AB-2) CURB MUCT SECTION
ATC"BASIN DIANE ANG GRATE SHALL BE MODEL DETAIL SHEET
J— ES
SNICKS AND MORTAR Ad' LAND Ifzea 2 GRATES 0_OAR PONTS BY LUEAAPGO GN "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVSION
TO BE USED TO MAKE FOUR WG.OF BRIXTON MA OP TON,
GRADE ADJUSTMENTS CET AT WINTER OXIDES AND Pf3ET AT:r SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
FRAME @ GRATEW�SIN
BRICKS AND.0. � BI FLASH PAVEMENT) OWNER
._
a o BE TIDED 70 MAKE
GRADE AJUSTMENTS ' Been AND MXNNA, GATT DRISCOLL ET E
8 31'04WfTER cU310 BE IF_ED i0 MAKE 18 N. Me E 901FRNnE @ GATE GRADE APNSTMFHTS AD
LYNN, TS 01901 /-- ,s-� Lf. LERTS 36055.36056.3609 / _ WILLIAMS
PRECAST TO BE wxD uoRr� ( Uy'. cCi0 az usAO To MAKE PRECAST N D R HNT: \\ SPARAGES CATCH BASIN GRADE AOJUET.DrTCATCH &451N NSD REALLY TRUST
40"E'.DLWETER 76 OAANLLE STREET
LYNN, MA 01905 1N NORIM WVX3AEET
A N SECTION EI FVATION SECTION 5 CLARK RN�UF SALEM, MA , MI�MRgI.RM019A9
^9 �K� A cc R� F R NC S ANG.. UMlTN-eOu
O' ffTFRY RAP 6 EASELS 7. B k 9 FAIL elm ID...
GRANITE CURB INLET DOUBLE-GRATE CB GRANITE CURB INLET B""'"
DETAIL SHEET 30F4
DETAIL DETAIL `" 5[A E:NOT TO SCALE
(NOT TO SCALE) - (NOT TO SCALE) SHEET 1 0 OF 1 1
I£
SINGLE G`o DOUBLE GRATE K I I. AUCUST 14,2015
A
i
LANNI H.TORION � GAILRLEPNLHO // / � I
OJ-0008 / FRANCES LUCALFREDCIIANNO ' LOUISOESEPH J,P. SLOSON / PAUL, PAULETTE.JOHN OJ-OOC} CADRE
M.
/ \ 0]-000] 07-0005 k SCOTT LEBI?NC / G 07-001 / LIN k OJ 0002 ENESHI WILLIAM M. HONROE. JR. / I -
07-0004 / 0]-0086 n
/
IN
ESAM 0Y.]-000I GAOIR I
/
RICHARD L. O'DAY
03-0137 ry^/ }?i\'b•
s>a a
AA, OPEN SPACE 1 1 CERTIFY THAT I HFVE CONFORMED
°?' .'8A" \\ LOT 2 - $ STJt AREA=168,388 S.F.
wrzH THE RULES nl:o REcuunOns
/ .> dy �. LOT 3 Rim (44,1003 S.F. WETLANDS) of THE REGISTERS of DEEDS IN
\ �o� 7.697 S.F. $_ W
4 7.OT ST.
/ / \'`F°o'• 4 <X` x06soa0iY .i g4A\+.. /i 8 PREPARING THIS vux. ___
p.zro. i • ________________
^ •e LOT 1 r' \f 6\ rt•'BsmRs R,Isi1 ),y2 S.F. W .B E WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
/ \ s.F. .q \�q e\ 'Jm ).g B'S' r___ ___ °
/ \ • Bj jjJ ,ti.l,>6°y x�BXO'N ' /"S •a // __ 501i>35'E �n
i>J•J ? xeeM It e•? B.•.,,o bats, mJT LOT 5 Bao- vs.J9 _ 8
p`,p.Nx IV ;Jp 7.421 S.F. // _ g
5P X06'•POIY rj `°� q_ 'W oo \ 'Q)4'
/ �} JEFFREY M. k \ IJnuly
ELLEN T. ROGATO °•X p,
0d2'a-.b001'Wp, �,�•mo.�djo$}..d\J`R�R µ y4m(79?5.F. q„ . Lr 'm.zSw'Mo"W3p• qaS�<itqmbePoz4 B x'`JAJ?rrB4B°J0pPo ;."+'yBtl'e 90)ee,>'<q°°�'1.0$34.'i/S°U' /. Je.�.8 3'WpB\!,]a.w aT%''SarTi SBTeS>e11T CRV'N
m '° FMA.Q4T'A� RonOwdr ,� 0 LOT 6
Bz1 <.;I LOT 13 7.203 S.F. uTeI'x xis'stii2 jB z \
A
•6.
\
\
\
\
CDY OF SALEM
EASEMENT LOT 14 PUNNING BOARD7L e
1233 S.F.
ST° aT9e
LOT OT S7`
12.9)3 S.F. 61,127 S.F. Ji'i ° ____-
-
-
:\
Y. ya Bye Lin � - ------_
"e- ey6 P>M •A\ •y BBX\z - 7994 SF
_%F e
$"R
TASExFM e%u'b) JW� F 8.370 S.F. 6.898 S.F. _ 6782 S.F. S.F.
----- ------------
0,245
___ _______-
LOT 9 •q _ LOT 11
4 Jd`H d .p �,b o y LOT i6 J�4 a "`bM>Po v. m �` �h F LOT 10 ^Sy-. S 813!
10,245 S.F. w a��oPo ss°Ji. I�mq r o _
• dS z^ n
E.E. b.gi Q �-0 B 'a''.GJ x•z,q p-ziov rr ITse m, a 1. 'Is' I^o . o _-_-
e •. B OSJ�Ay ^ �'0t i J" LOT 17 °iez.yPo i_esia 70 ao °-wnY,. n�5'oa g"R m^8 -____--
S z
£ ne Oqux 8.333 S.R. B 3J 19,)8 4 -95. ]SR
J.
4'.3 .9 q,z>33
/ .•"erg \ i bZ\ GSEMEM e ^ s I m'.5•xx _�
n iT�J
Jp > /
°m4i'Ot n e.a�xsoe. °•jo'loi��
\/� • O J ' ?g ey. e+ ,) 2l..' Sa}TS5'IB' R $ Z6n ___-----___------
1.55
_ __
/ Y / mW 58,'xl•mT -5`6 u. pxBsti R�55.x� lR_IN}05 Bb W prpo< 91
JS.Bx Sd'xt'S9'E Pi's < 1. 4-
"I"
ij. p.� H0549'45T $ g'
56.0
HIT O'• q IDI ep e
.^
TRAIN 2014 / imen T /_^'.q se4 n's9_t zus..B z LOT 78 x :os35'eq a i'ii°73a. °.,zy>1 q.r
REALTY TRUST .,, / 11,644 S.F. `
Ct\Z ''JyJ 06-0019/ TADEUSZ k �/ ^4 T. e-R i�i0' ba poj9a9
/ JOANNA p.l•9N9y p.
G PMLIN000WSNI W_/ n 10.o49T8 S.F. Pn50W mNI ;•P'Y^ n d•00W Ix83!'S3' SALE.
ry°.A n v '° $ b` B'L•50 fA CONSERVATION DATE'. _
LOT 24 .naax
J./ °y qa COMMISSION
12.06 S.F. RI /Ih ax.J•ia 06 0011
/ '\ / s%•'xis3t `ee.py I,R LOT
S 25 Ig qA B14+J> R7h
4 OUT ,p 7.904 S.F. d
PI AN REFERENCES- ° AZO � 9e.J5.,v C1?b H s1 .+4?8i6 1p •6J S
ee`,�P ae i\ LOT 26 1
2 /w fX rn?ex •EC e'•s`�B /•GI�¢B F Xr 9 o'x 7.853 S.F. IR
1) LAND COURT PIAN 7159-B s \ g /.Y f.a ?.�Y>". �F 5•,t9p'� pr'C'M1 v9�B' $B.
2) LAND COURT PLAIN 7159-x '/ia J /"^J sps' .•8$• xzew Blns
3)LAND COURT PUN 7159-2 - W /^ LOT 20 SA `•19p0 LOT 23
4) AN UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED -DEFINRIVE ^$ •, .>'� '_5is 0+ 8,251 S.F. '
SUSDMSIOn PUN, CHAPEL HILL, SALE.. $rySI o/ 14.709 S.F. $R/C' a ••Bea 4 p +' `eM1° ai'•3r 2 QQA �O 1
MAE HU5ETT5•DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REYISEp Jy,•L M1 / •L,y«. X-IwS.m ?\ "C e SCA j
§ LINE
THREAC ( EEMAOCTOBER 26. 2008 BY DECISION
;TERN uup M1 LOT 22 g$ ey y/ . ZONE
SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3. 2008 DECISION BY / \ p_W'PSJ p 7Gb SJ`. q�ee'eA M1�)° '(' n
SALEM PWlNING BOPRD). b`b / LOT 210 8I
DENOTES A STONE BOUND
/\/ji�Iiy., m\ J. a i6��/ � xgi•6'S32 0 � WITH A DRILL
HOLE HOLE TO BE SET,
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PIAN / `✓ �ryWti X Bad x / NBT•0'S3'E Tla a>NBT•BPS-OS j�19
DAIS: xi l• 1 12/0>I2015
/W r',\ 3 N°tlunyat°Nb s69ex 11/IORO15
1, NOTICE
OF THE Cltt OF SALEM. 00 ,n\ 7 Ne tlunyeaWNh aM1eeT
HEREBY PLANNING
THAT THE BEEN
OF APPROVAL OF TIHISRECORDED
PUN THIS
/ GYYE,R \ 1 W[IIIx 1E/19;Ndea 9pR015
MAN
THE PUNNING BOP O PP BEEN RECEIVE PDO RECORDED Ai THIS 1�•\ REVLSroN OAIF
_ OFFICE EXT THAT NO APPEAL WAS D RECD DURING THE M{NIC SELLS k ^
PATS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE ISAB6-0 15 ^•r.p �\
/ DEFINITIVE PLAN
06-0015
_____ ________ r "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
C1tt CLERK •+
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OPEN SPACE 2 �� OWN R.
2
AREA=135,070 S.F. LOT 27 BARBARA ORISCOLL ET AL
(47,$003 S.F. WETLANDS 147,992 SF. z 18 WA LAC01901D i,C
LC CERTS 36055.36056.36057 WILLIAMS LLIAM��SSQ
_ RESIDENTIAL flE510FNnAL 1 OF WAIVERS R 0 ST D APP�(o� SP�AGES
ZONE: ONE-GAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY 76 RUltt TRUST m® •� �
(R1) (Q (R1)CLUSTER 1.SECTION N A.1.1 WHICH REOVINES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THOOY ]6 OAKVKLE STREET
LYNN. 01905 159NORMMAINSTREFT
MINIMUM LOi MONTAGE. 100 FT I50 R (230) FEET FOR CUI STREETS,AND. IN PLACE THEREOF.ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS pROJFDT LDCUS: SUIIE901
e (NONE) SHOWN ON PUNS. OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS,, CIARK AVENUE SALEM. MA urog310N,AW01999
E MINIMUM LOT WIOnI 100 FT 150 R (NONE) TOTAL PARCEL AREA SF. - 3•'UxN d S ORS R F R N E S HIONBM79393JU OY
MINIMUM LOT AREA: IS.Wp S.F. 40,Op0 S.F. (NONE) 2-SECTION N AFAR WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC SIREFE HOT i0 C%CEED 500 FEET IN MIN. OPEN SPINE REQUIRED � 150.108 S.F. (20S OF TOTAL) N MAp 6 PARSES ],8 k 9 FA%.8)91539-98W
LOT'COYEFAGE BY BUILDING: ]OZ 455 304 LENGTH. AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROM AS SHOWN
LOT'C HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 Fr 45 R 35 E ON PUNS. (MIN. OPEN SPACE UPI-AND LINED = ]5P54. WHICH IS 504 OF OPEN SP REQUIRED) YaI�I YM1 3
OPEN SPACE PROMDED - 303,458 SF a o' 7.o' 4o fio' DEFINITIVE SHEET 1 OF 2
IkMO_ .INIMUM TRpM YARD: 15 R 30 R 15 FT 3.SECTION N RIGHT OF WAV IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3)- (OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROYTOED 211.8583 sS.)
_ MINIMUM SIDE YAH IO Fi 30 FT IO R CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER,AND. IN PUCE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT, C/ SCALE:r-4o' SHEET 2 OF 1 1
MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 R 30 R 30 FT A0005T 14.2DI$
NOTE THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RICHT i0 MEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. �1 '�'
a
11,127 ST..
. .. ° >,298 S.F. Xn1 Ero°- sas�i1T Yr3MeirB! c
o
LOT 8 gl LOT 9 g LOT 11
wr �\50JPF /§'/• \�. J`bPo '•>'��ia. 6.370 S.F. 1 6398 S.G. ° m 2994 S.F. $ 3s
LOT 18 J row I� a>ez 5o. $$,3 r
° 's4 8 8 xOs'Seant lea• Pa. ° 10,24s S.F. w 4.a o _
KORAN se.>a.,1 d J ;W -Po,wr,. <- e-zzlrlr -I�sP'or z R at mtr e p
cIn 8 Al,
LOT 77 e'.p.'Aro i-=e9oO° e:zioao °:°'zp,.- c °q_is°'00
7 a;as . °i,. a-S s i_:'�'a- -9ss •-8 ^-
`1P' F/SgFM B.2M S.G. p-1.
R-Z)°00 Po A Zla6� A, R-b W
C) e ITA o-Z-b nq c ie. e-zsz5'te- 'Josz a•lw s•'zz-
10,
o Z Y 31'S9Y r�M1S 1'° -5]. O e'�OR p-150�W B.9t
a P`�� a 4�. •.eon ' v">- S•P0's xas_-E °€
9 *, TRAM 3016 5669 1' l?g -N,H-.TE ID4U LOT 18 L-Ot3 r 3Sab <}7%9 R-j'>'Z.- e-
RALTYTR9/ TIDEU52 & 3�'�"Q/ 11.6HS.F. P.3y1tp �¢ „�8�d `L3BPo [,�,.WODDLANDS
JDANNA �PiO»Y 000140' p6E•0<• �0'ePo ROAD
ZG / fl4RCIKOW$KI / L07 19 ° - WITH
THE RULES THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
06-0017 �A../ 10.{98 S.F. P-s0<e b 8 ,: ° Or 4•Z'r0� a SAL
EM OF THE RECISTERSNOFROEEOSTIryNS
/ "' LOT 24 « B• P�y0p9 PREPARING THIS PLAN.
CONSERVATION
�$/ e q tx 33 $rvR n COMMISSION
12,636 S.G. J7 1 _ Po 1 06-0011 _ _ ______
Soo e� 1- WILl1AM5 & SIP GES LLC
T I.B °so ,s I� o204 S.F. a m e-eiss°�> R �
�s ns 1.5! Rips N .%PoR 4, s ,,.
CRF zyr, °a',4 .•n,e \ 2 LOT 26
C �- ` P,•If'L !Po a I �� YS<s'm 7.853 S.F. �Y
>" P LOT 20 ,s,ao Y. i. LOT 23
•�"� / 14.709 s.f. "a. 8.15'•"oi 6.25t S.F. rBJ" n g
� �m °L- T °r1)�F 'TION R1
° 'S00 A SCALED-LOCI
z \ \ J�' vsizs 5s' e.1ZIIz°- LOT 22 $mow\ 'O ti's _ .. ZONE LINE
s5o\ /m LOT 21 _
09
/ ZFJ�7 9.104 S.F.
7" Spr'CB.�JJ•
..(DJ /A,'ry � ).5�, a24�,3u'/ N9!'•fis
zzBwJb 1]q/ xer•e SYcTo 10221
,<1, 91 xer•n'u'E
oT°^
/ FAYUEofxI \5t
sURTA&
\ / ISABEIIE q^,p vt1 Cltt OF SALEM
06-001515 ryP/ �1 PLANNING BOARD
=>„Bsv OPEN SPACE 2 - - — -
S.F. ---
AREA=135,070 S�
\ v LOT 27
(A],SOOt S.F. WETLANDS) $ 147,993 S.F. ° Y
8 �
ry
0
y
'� Ig
8
Wa
B\ Y
In
g DATE:
JAMES E. CONNICK
06-0005
O- DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ZONEONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY —
(Rt) (1) (R1) CLUSTER / - 9m3s'<BT 5]J)> 500'ZB'O!”[y>
MINIMUM LOT GRONTAGE: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) b
3 Ne Nngeam MIs sRtt 81001301E
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) 3 Xo<Ilangn mlFh sP<N IIf
MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 SF 40,000 SE (NONE) LYNN SAND& STONE 1 Ld ilne 16(19;Xmn 9H1201SR01f
LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% C/ AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES N0. Pfl'610X ��
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUN9NG: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT 06-0012
DEFINITIVE PLAN
_ uiwMuu SIDE Y NG 10 F`TT io FT io 7 I "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT }0 FT
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: OWNER: I
TOTAL PARCEL AREA-750,538 S.F. BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL A
MIN, OPEN SPACE REQUIRED - 150,108 SF. (20% OF TOTAL) 16 WALLACE ROAD
= ST OF WAVERS REQUESTED (MIN,OPEN SPACE UPLONO REQUIRED - 75,054, WHICH IS 502 OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED) LYNN, TS 01901 c•i! i.Y
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PUN OPEN SPACE PRONOEO - 301450 S,F. LAPPLICANT6055.}6056.36057 _, UJJAMS
v ISECTION N&I f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY (OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROVIDED - 211.6595 5 F,)
'- DATE' (2}O) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS.AND. IN PLACE THEREOF.ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS NSD REALTY TRUST SPARAGES
I, CLERK OF THE COT OF SALEM, 00 SHOWN ON PVNS. ]6 N. IN LE STREET
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY LYNN. MA C1905
THE PLANNING 80.480 HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS 25ECTION IV 0.4.0 WHICH REQUIRES CUL-0E-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN CL T 0-IS' 15yRr[THN
ATMn41N....
OFFICE µD THAT R APPEAL WAS R EIVED DURING THE TWENTY LENGTH, µD IN PLACE THEREOF. ALLOW A LENGTH OP 108903 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN PUN REFERENCES' SUL <G CLgflK AVENUE SFLEM. MA 1 MICgEIDN.0001949
GAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF Slip NOTICE. ON PLµ$. 4 4 C DR R F R NC S RHNI M70 f39-9000
1 0 COURT PLAN 71 -8 F.VCI9181 f39-0EC0
o M
G
WI 0 U 59 90TEP p MAP 6 PARELS 7, 6& 9
A 3sECPON IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE }}' 2) LAND COURT PUN 7159-% ° RxgM, At >
@ CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, MO. IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO(2) TREES PER LOT. 3) UNG COURT PLAN 7159-2 Wstt• o• a0 °Q' go, DEFINITIVE SHEET 2 OF 2
C1tt CLERK 6) SA UNRECORDED PUN ENTITLED 06FINRhE SUBDIVISION PUN, CHAPEL HILL. SALEM,
NOTE: THE APPLICµi RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. EASTERN LAND S DATED JUNE 20, 2006 00�REVISEDDE MOOUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY A9N _ O 11
EASTERN LAND SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY SALEM PUNNING BOARD). T+ SCALE 1 40 SHEET J OF 1 1
ILL 7/1 AUGUST 10,3015
t
SEE RROFI SHEET 2
CENTLITY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
ROGER. 0 THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
EnEN SPACE 1 HER RING THIS PTAN.
RMI
WI ----------
4 WWWW—
HE ."',R
,FN
S?vo- "W" EWW�IF I'D
W.&
14
OU
IROP.
"WONOWER,Ir
DID OWN
SUM TMINE DID
.S
NOW,= ,I OWED UNGE., W.W.
WE C =NN
do PIE 11 lip,
CII OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
1.OF WERN.E., SEE PROFILE SHEET 2
.OF MOSAI MWI
OISE INN IF 1. —M
SE FORME.L... 4
4�SMILLEMY 0 UILS "BROVE
WANDO.OR DDRUMN-USED
SMIRSE I.AR
Ir RED IWI 0
6-11,11 —-----—------
Q -----------———
LEGEPID OF SYMBOLS AND ABBRIDIRATIONS S
....NO WELL C11-
FIRE DO
OL
WFED WE
EVIGN(SEANO 0
LLJ ILL
LTIDIN P. 7)0()
all) CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PILAR af
NOT VAX --—-—---------- LISI WAN�S
—FNUE 1,SECTION IV kl.f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERUNE.,1.1 TWG HUNDRED THIRTY(230)FEET
.ED.-HOLD CLERK OF THE CUT OF t��.'EAD�G BI FOR CURVES EIREEIS.MO.IN ILFMDE THI ALLOW THE R.IYOUT AS SHOWN 0.PLANS. ---------------—------
HERESY CESTIF"(THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF 2.SECNom V A.4.0 WHKN WEQFIRZS �UL-01-W STREETS NVI 10�CEED.FELT IN OCR...�AD I.
OON�EEFTFE THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS R,WVE THEREOF,ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089,03 FEET FOR ROAD WS SHOWN ON PLANE. DATE: ------—---------
OFFICE AND THAT NO AMPERE WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWEREFT
BEIANG ND-- DAYS NEVT AFTER SUCH SECURE AND RECORDING OF SAO NOTICE, 3 SECTION N RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS FEDLI�WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO.1 3 4T INFINNIN
END-FOUND AS FEET ON CENTER.MO.IS W-WO1 THEREOF A-LOW TWO(2)TREES FER LOT.
.R-WHEEL DIMS RMF ----—--———------------ NOTE,THE APNEONNT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MEND THIS LIST NUMERG THE 1EIRIT PIG�GGG
N/F-NOW OR FERNERY CITY CLERK
ROD. WOR SOD
IF A.
EMSFING EOWI
PROW�D CONTOUR J.
1.OF RAVERENT .... EP q-
NONE.WANKITE OJOB OPOSED ll�
8
ELF FORDE 02�
ul-
A N
PROPOSED SNU ELOMFOR 1+
RM gh
.REMNI FLOW DIRECTOR —.0 U'HU,
S DEVIATE STORE BOUND
DENOTE A
WITH A DRILL OTE To BE SET,
6-B� ag�
D.
nh-�-
0 �7 �201
Ld -R9I 1 9/4120 f 1 a 5 5
z
LLI
B,E, DR. WER,
Ar
L) SIR- DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
1,WD WOODLANDS ROAD
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER
EARBARJN DRISCOLL ET I
M i
2 '+- IS WALLACE ROAD
LYNN. MA 01901
LC DEBTS 36055.360
5636057 & WILIJAMS
APPLICANT- 'w
5.00% -FF 1.66% 50'vc— NSO REALLY TRUST & SPARAGES
76 ONWILLE STREET
LYNN. RA 01905 C
IC
CLARK AVENUE SALEM. MA
I DATUA- .(110"U"MMEW
7 125.00 1+0. 1+DV 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+OD D+OD D+S. b+" aloo D+D. 9+50 L.FIV IlFEIDU s
2 El MMM MR 6 PARELS 7. 8&9 FRO 0.1 IRH.00
9� 9 20- 4W w
PROFILE SHEET I OF 2
WOODLANDS ROAD
+
+ +
X.
w + 4 Z SHEET 4 OF I I
+
CLERKS CEUIFICATION OR THE PLAIN SEE PROFILE SHEET I
LC
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO
HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED MO RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY S
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAD NOTICE.
T 7 I'S
E Ilk. —--------
CRY CLERK
S
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES ANED REGULATIONS
OF YHE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
0 19. AD PREPARING THIS PORI
RNII
X,S' XXWCEE.I..
12'ROP W W'IVM
vj -
D, OPEN
M., N, V71[7WMS �c SP GES LY
SPAI
SET
1..2
00
'?o Z41V
PRPOEFORES
PRI�12 50
scXNEN,M.
41=Y-V UISS
CIT-Y OF SALEM
WE,6=ISSID
.1-RX, KIDD.OF PLANNING BOARD
EWERSENC,
IF E
12-RES FEW
FEET U`WQ` vqmR ---------------
ul
ANI 0'XNNU... -------------------
z
A ..STRUCTURE
RBI
0 w..". ----------------
ir 12'ROP.-H.
0
--------------------
-—------------------
7
--------- -------
DAM
LEGEND OF STTSBOLS AND ABBREDRAIDONS
2 81; -Z�
II; A vt 9 WORTIYONS E.
2
9 2.: FIRE I-YERANT
rSEI
WATER DATE
T'L
CATCH EARN(ORM) 0 X'-'!L'A
�111L 1
UTfLDY FGHE 1-IR
LIGHT POUE DENOTES A GRANITE STORE BOUND
DFAUN NANHOLE WIT4 A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET
SAI NAVI
CORO �CONCRETE
WIN KA. UU.V///
L WIN- I 8DH .STONE DOLLED DRILL HOLE B"
11 IND� FOUND �:n —-77:::���Sl -
W,K�WHEEL CRAIG NANP DATE
L
I WK, X/F� NOW OR FORMERLY
ROO .IRON ROD
OR SOUTH RIDGE CIRCLE
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
I IST OF WAWRS REQUESTED
EXJSNNG CONTOUR
-50Nvc -50'VC- 1 SECTOR IV A.I.1 WHICH RECURES A NAINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY 01
BARBARA DRISCOLL EF ALL
(230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS.MD. IN PLACE THEREOF. AELDIX THE ROAD. LAYOUT AS PROPOSED CONTOUR 15 WALLACE ROAD
8 SHOWN ON PLANS. up "INIORM"'."I
EDGE OF FI WMLIAMS
WIC AFr a
- SECTION IV A4,o WHICH REOXJRSES IDI STREEFS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN LC 'W--K SPARAGES
J�l� s T' ;T 2
41! J2 - I
9 ) --I-; I - �l 40-
CATUI LENG".AND IN PLACE THEREOF, LOW A LENGTH OF 1059 03'EIFF FOR ROAD AS SHOWN VERTICAL GRANITE CURB APPLICANT'
C�lo 01 1.00 1+50 2+00 2+50 ON PLANI NSD REALly TRUST
0, PROPOSED SILT FENCE 76 CAKMLLE STREET
IE '"N. MA OISOI
SOUTH 3.SECTION N FIGHT OF WA�PAPROVEMENTS FOLEY WHICH REOUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 J"
EE CAJPER+ DD FEET ON CENTER.AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TAD(2) TREES PER LOT. PROPOSED SPOT EHUAV�ION T lugHD
X"DOLDRON...'".
RIDGE N
I I + + NOTE THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MEND THIS LIST DURING THE PESVIT PROCESS. SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION PHONE MGM S3S-lKXB
eESW,E�FERENCE s
CIRCLE FAXORMIS"200
C, PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 2
+ 0 29 4 80'
SCiul:V-40'(HOR)&4F(mT)
SHEET 5 OF I I
7N
USE A
OF GEORGE
GAIL FDJHD
DOW AN.—I I
iF
11 07� 7ES LUCIANO 1�- -L H
DURING JENIETTIE TORIO_ `-4-MED�1� �T� / LORRANE M, WILLIAM M. MONROE,JR.
- -: --,bAGL v E IUR SENA MYSENESHI
"DAST C. 7 -- / — TRUST IF
& 07-0076
7- 5 07`Qg- 07-0002 07-OOBS ESAN Y, ASI
Q BOB 07-0001
H Z — —
I I CERTIFY THAT I HA� CONFORMED
GPM SPA
U/ RICHARD L O'CAY OOH
03-0137 INN THS RULES AND REGULATIONS
OrH
UI THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
PREPARING THIS PLAIN
PROPOSED EWN OPEN SPACE I
m SOBS SPARAGIES LEE
Or EARN USE A
OF OF WOOD.
ODIN)
w NXNWCEI Jim or EROSION,
ON,GFUGGRED".
IT L
M,Tj-_-'.F
4
WW—
PAI
A,
CITY OF SALEM
RADWEED.
RINI PILANNING BOARD
ED,
F Ey M. V
'LiL,"N `7"CAT
02-CG.E -----———---—
SWII
——----—----——---
---------------------
OPDSEE`
WOMAGE
DE,
--—---—-----------—
P,IGEN it
-WRt - ---------—--
TRAN �.I-
RIDALTY RU!T
CCI
Z S
H�Kl com
"IV O.H /I 06M SS!QN
cl IJ-
OMMUNII
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS MD ABBR ON c
M.NHORNG AUM.
tp DENOTES A DRAWS STONE BOUND
FIRE HDOGANT ZONE WITH A DRJU- HOLE TO BE SET
IT 20"
WATER DATE
CATCH DAMON DOWN)
UOUTY POLE
I TIE
LIGHT ROLE
J-1
TOP RAPHIC PLAN
DNAN MANHOLE @ 1, WON.
o STAGS MANHOLE (5) "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
HUSETTS
CGNC -CONCRETE
cNEI ONNS,W*O.C.m) SALEM, MASSAC
SBUH�STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE ol SP
.FOUND BARBARA DRISC
FIND SUNDA IS
Ark, LLALL
'a AA
.INAEOL CHAIN NUMP ISABI WWW LYNN. MA 0190,
06-0015 �v I LE CENTS 36055,36056,36057
N/F. NOW OR FORMERLY -.4 wl s
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL aw aP _
INOD. IRON GOO ONI INDUSTRIAL ONL-FAMILY TRUST C _AEAqES
TREE 0 LERIC5 CERTIFICNITON ON THE PLAN ZONE. GH RI) CLUSTER 76 OXI STREET
(PIT LYNN. MA 01905
DATE: 150 7 (NONE) mus, IT 1.11N I"N MAN EPAEM`
EXISTING 001 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE Too FT Sm vr�l CLARK NANUE SALEM, MA .,,GUVG,UNAVNN.
v Or SALEM. DO Do F, 150 IT (NONE) WHOWE 07M 53"-som
------ MR. ( TH CITY MINIMUM LOT WIDTH (NONE) WHIP. ASSESSORS BEFgR�II
PROPOSED CONTOUR HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE O�FAPAONAL OF THIS PLAIN BY MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15 BOB OF. WOOD S F, 30% ANSI 6 PARELS 7. 8&9 s 1.EII 9.
RECEDED AND RECORDED AT TUIS
.1 PA�Crl Or HE Ul".NG WARD HAS BEEN HOT MNACE BY BUILDING: 36% 45% 35 FT X`I j 0' 20' 40' 8.01 TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 11
E I Flpl.1 THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWFNT� MAMMUMI HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 0 F` OW,
..m CURB SAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH ROOK AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE, DO r 15 FT
MINI;MUM FRONT YARD 15 FT T
MUM SIDE YARD 10 IT m IT 10 FT
PROPOSED SILT PENCE MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT DO FT 30 F, I. ...
----OF
PROPOSED SPOT aEVA70N
Ri
SURFACE CUM DIRECTION
201.
I CERTIFY THAT I CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES ME REGUILATIONS
OIL 0- OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
4,F F; PREPMING THIS ILION.
NCLAMS �k SIP G&LLC
oc//,
2
0- PROPOSE,,
WHOLE
"'TIN IS
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
------—-----—-
4V TOR
QD
0
CHOI BWM`NX*"0'UYN
SONY,&
ISABELLE WRYO
-----------—
1R..1� —-----—
\< KE OF
IWI
I A,
WE
WE
17 WE
DATE
OR bi
a BE _IGg q
F XIII-A-ill
vz
RFAI
-Ice
WSXTA
110 W A14 VID
112-
W,kKj
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREMATIONS
-JANIE-1 U-CONN1C.
06_.&MR- I
MONITORING WELL RIF pi
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET
FIRE 1 IS- DENOTES A CRWNITE STONE ROUND
.ER CAPE IR
XG,
CATCH BASIN(DEAN) 0
WF E 2
UOUTY ROLE FlO., I
UGHT POLE G,
3 l2/G7/ZOIS
EY.N-GO, �STGNE zg�=ts —
I \ I - ... 9/412015
NRNNW.
MANHOLE @ I INDU�RIZB
RE.1 RMYOSON
SEWER..T,mE TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
CORD�COKCRETE o
a W,�,N,..., -1 1 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
SECT�SPOKE MONO DRILL HOLE ICE'o, 6
END FOUND SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
IS.G.N P OWNER�
I �l ANI
N/F.NOR OR FORMERLY i
IRT. 18 UACC ROAD
IINRA.0190,
MOT- RRON NO. 4irRTS 360553605636057
Lc C WMLLAMS
ov, 0 1 SPARAGES
TIES RESIDENTXJ� RIBIDENT)XL CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN APAIRANT DUST
OAKVILLE STREET
t ZONE ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FANILY 76 C
EXISTING CONTOUR HRI) 0) HRI) CLUSTER DATE: .1\l" LYNN, MA 01905
IT T IMINORTHRORSTROBT
I I OW SORE 101
PROPOSED CONTOUR ------ ii
M LOT FRONTAGE: Too FT 150 FT N CLERK OF THE CITY OF SAUEM. BE WF.1- SUM. PROJECT
MIXOMU THAT THE NOTICE OF APPRONAL OF THIS PLAN By CILAR� NUERMN�
EDGE OF ONT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT ISO FT =ONE) HEREBY CERTIFY CE
EP ONE) TH PLANIN G BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS ,R NHERM,0.1 ITH.
NBC MINI ON LOT AREA 15.000 BE, �GOOO SY. (N HE) E 1. ASSESS s NNTENHOS�'..
GRMFE CURB UOT"CONIERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% BOX OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEA_WAS RECEIKIED DURING TVIE TRENTY' MIUX 6 PANELS 7, 8 & 9
VERICIT DAYS
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT NEV AFTER SUCH RECEIPT XND RECORDING OF SUED NMI CE (WIL
IN INH, 0' 20F 40X so TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 2 OF 2
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
MNMU. MONT YARD 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT Jv Sc�,L-40'
M '0 ----------01ITTLERK---------- SHEET 7 OF I I
S PROPOSED SPOT ULflIXTI.N M:N! ON SIDE YARD 1 0 FT 3D FT 1 FT
MINIMUM PERMIT YARD: Bo FT 30 FT 0 FT AUGU51 is
SURWE FILM DIRECTION
ORKH MANHOLE COVERS EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FRAME&ORATE IR..l I CHAFF
ENSIE.GRACE OR FINISHED GRACE "MANED ENACT FINISHED GRADE
.I AND 01 SURRICH TO PA.lCl MAN.Ou FRAI.0 GXTM� BOOKS AND KICSTAR V�TAR
1.IIIE JZE.TO VARI 6-INCR FILAT TOP COVER AS SPECIFIED 1.BE USED TO A.E BNCKS AND MORTAR
CRAZE ADJUSTMENTS COVERS TO SUPPORT AN 'BE USED I
4 MIN, DEADI AOI TO 0 MAKE
CONCRETE CELLAR MR. 1.F.P—` CNPRUEN 70 PROI �AAI A.��TNINTS
.% .1. -01.0-TO BE 12-INCH COVERS TO
72 RI GAMETE. FORECAST IN RISER SUPPORT AN H-20 LO�
0 0
R
OPENING
_111OL'TO
ERICK FOR GRI mlc�`T-N
ADJUSTMENT SECTION
PRECAST THURSTON LONCk_SECTION KEEPHOLF TO BE
SECT OR BARREL ED CAST IN RISEN
C
SECT WITH PRECAST FIBER 10H
NIUZT 1111 TOP SILAS
CRIFICE
RU99IR '0'RING
PRE-CAST CONCRETE CASKET OR PRZ-
INFILTRATOR BASIN SOON PANEL HIN CRITICS R.M:.L ; -"
AP FORMED FLEXIBLE ON SEE OF IIIE
JOINT SEALANT 1 CLEABANCE
PATER 2 AIDES SECTICI
LEVEL
17
--I PIPE
MANHOLE RUNGS CATCH BASIN TAPE NOR
IF MAL CUTS.-OF FIRE
MR BULTIPLES OF IN,SE SECTOR SATER .2-CLEARANCE
LEVEL
ZIRGUG
BE BE PIPE 1.2.3.4.5 OR 6 FT
12'.1NNU. APANC, LENDERS AS RED D
SCREENED GRAVEL 0 U N LESS OTHERWISE CATCH BASIN NAl
UNDISTURBED EARN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS
SECTION CADE slcl.__�
MANHOLE COVERS 7�
(2)BRAIN I2..NMU--------
SCREENED MAW
HIM JFXRlRBUD E�ATN
12' MINIMUM SCREENED GRAVEL PRECAST DOUBLE-GRATE CATCH BASIN 12......U.
CUTLET SCREENED GRAVEL UN.IEYuNED.EARY,
U R A IN PIPE DETAIL
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM BEAR 3- MINIMUM CONCRETE FILL (NOT TO SCALE)
SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN DCUBLE GRATE
THE MANHOLE BARREL PRECAST CATCH BASIN
SECTION VKAUL OR TOP SLAB
MHCHPVER IS GREATER UNDISTURBED EARTH DETAIL
MA HOLE COVENS
PRECAST CATCH BASIN (NOT TO SCALE)
FARM,E SINGLE GRATE
PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE LIFTNO ST.
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL GAME
DETAIL (HOT To SCALE)
(HOT TO SCALE) CEFT OF S,kLEM
-TDAINDY BACK' PLANNING BOARD
A_UED STEREEN
#THF GRATE AND RAVE --—-—-—-- 1w CE R TIFF THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
TH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
PREPARING THIS PLAN.
PLAIN
S;p710N CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAIN -WILLIAMS & SIPAFMES LLC
7 1 C DATE: ------—-——---- BE NKIE LIFTING ST. CATCH IMM.CRAFT
A ffION
1. CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM.DO A I, HUNGED AS.THE
HERIEW IDENTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY 6 0. .DTOMP AND
D_C. 2 C' THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AMID RECORDED AT THIS BELOI THC LIFERS
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE WENTY 4 0- STRAPPE.
DAYB NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT MD RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE�
1_� I HOMER ST.
4-1 1 v ------------------------
7Y'
T-M r��WIT
SEGMENT TRAP OR
CURB SECTICH
X_GR-N_ OPEN FREW ORNMEE
CURB MUEl SECTOR
TI7.1 CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP DATE:
PRECAST F DETAIL I
CATCH PRECAST (HOT to SCALZ)
CATCH
A�TION OPEN THROAT GRARTECE BASIN S A
CURB INLET SECTOR
3 rI.ARGE CATCH BAER FRAME PLANT
AN B
D C�G�LORRION
LV120 OR ARPOROJED EQUALL OPE THREAT GRANITE A. i. DAN
(o L.FORNTS me LI
CUTS INUE'SEGDON
T CATCH BAERN FRAME AND GRATE SHAM SIC MODEL DETAIL SHEET
AND 2�0-2 GRATES 0 DOW FORM BY LEBANON
BIRICKS AHD.0. tv-2448-2 FAMBE WTH UR12GO GRATES ON SHOPES "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVSION
10 BE USED 10 MAKE FOUNCE INC OF BROCKTON. A.1 EQUAL
CRUDE ADJUSTMENTS DRY
Y FSAME GJATE 2.- M KS AND MORTAR 211' (SET AT SINGER CQUICBE AND RESET AT I' SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
TOO MEOW RMSH RAVE.1.7)
BE USED M MAKE
DIRGE ABASTIBENTS
OWNER,
C BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
SO HE ARE..PPAR
TO BE USED ED WAKE 18 WAJLLACE ROAD
ART.�'CHAMETER 0.Bl'DRAMPTER 'RE.1'OXI 1 22' 1 GRACE LYNN. MR 01901
FRAME GRARE BEREMS AND OREAR CC DEBTS 36055 36056.36057 WMLMMS
PREC&STF NPRE�ST PRECAST TO BE USED TO RACE PRECAST APPLICANT' T-.4
-A CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN CRI ADLUSYMENTS CATCH BASIN RED REALTY TRUST SPARAM
CATCH BASIN 76 OBBOXIL E STREET
40- OUMETER
LYNN. MA 1905- C
0 T 119---N—
PROJECT I OCUS SUEDE 101
a SECTION ELENVITION SECTION SEA.
A-A CLARK AVENJER�EJEN" MUDOUTDON,MAOMH9
A__6 ASSESS RS BEE CIE. S PHONE DUN El...
HOUR 6 PARELS 7. a& 9 f.074153INUOR
GRANITE CURB INLET GRANITE CURB INLET
DETAIL SHEET 3 OF 3
DETAIL DETAIL SCAI NOT TO SCABI-E
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) SHEEr 10 OF 10
0 SINGLE GRATE COURTS GRATE O.' ' o "GUST 14,2015
CLERKS CERTIPCA7IDNI ON'HE PLAN
N I IST OF WAIVERS REOUESTED DATE ---—----------
"SECTION N ATE WHICH RMBIRES� MINIMUM CENTERUSE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY
(230) `EET FOR CURVES STREETS. PLO, 18 ILACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS I CLERK OF THE CTEY OF SALEM. DO
SHOWN ON PLANS hREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE 01 APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN By
THE PLNNNtNG BOARD HAS SEE. RECEIVED.0 RECORDED AT THIS
2.SECTION N A�To WHICH REQUIRES COL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWEITTY
BAY,NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE,
LENGTH.AND IN PLACE THEREOF,ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089,03 FEET MR ROAD AS SHOWN
ON PLANS,
3SLCTION IV RIGHT OF BAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES 10 BE 3 -------------------------
CALIPER. 30 FEET ON CENTER..0. IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT. CITY CLEW
NOTE SHE APPLICANT RESCRVCS THE RIGHT TO AMONG THIS 11S7 DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS
a BOGOR I CERTIFY THAT 1 HARE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
PREPARING THIS PLAN
- --ART
MCINrrY MAP N ��P GES LLC
i*=800,± BAN.H
.11. / AUTD. 1. �pm A,
Bl-.. FUNFOS LCUOU P, PAII PAU. �.IVXI K
SILLSON JOLN&�GB GAL L FAU01=AN&,�,j ILE,&OSMA
NOTES� 07-F.
.-.04 0O-R`,,I FSO.
1.VERFTCAL DAP.M UNKNOWN (SEE NOTE 2) MONROU�4,
.l-.R ASCUSAMB
.l-RXF
2 EXISTING PROPERTY SCUMDARY. TOPOGRAPHY AND STIUMES ARE AS SNOWN ON T+1E LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREOATIONS
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEFINITIVE SOBOMSION BY THE CITY OF SALEM (MASON 3. 200B
DECISION) ENTITLED -DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN.CHAXPEL HILL.SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS- 0137 MONITORING.111
DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 207 BY EASTIERIN LAND SURVEY FIRE HYDRANT
3. WETUAND RESOURCE AREA BOUNDARIES WERE DELINITED By WILLIAMS &SPARALES 2 3
4, THE CONTRACTOR STALL.RE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE 4 OPEN SPACE 1 WATER GATE
LOCATION, SIZE.0 ELIEVATIOR OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. SHOWN OR NOT S.OWN ON
THESE PLANS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHAUL BE NOTIFIED IN CATCH BASIN(DRAIN)
WRONG OF ANY UTILLIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND C.1 5 DBUBY FOU'
R.
APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORN -A.H., LIGHT POLE
5 TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT BE HEAL PATCHED. 6
6, Pil WATER MAINS SHALL BE C DIAMETER CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED BOOTLE IRON ORRN MANHOLL
(CLOIL ) UNLESS OTHEWISE NOTED 13
7. M-1-GRAV1TY SEWER LINES SHALL BE 8-DIAMETER SON 35 PVC PIPE, 14 7 SEWER MANHOLE OS
12 15 CONC� CONCRZTE
8 WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPA�TON a 9 10 11 SECH �STONE BOUND DRILL TDIE
OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTIICAL SElMRA70N OF 18 INCHES STALL BE MAINTAINED 16
WHERE WATER AND SEWER LINES CROSS. INS- FOUND
9. ALL STORM DEANS SHALL BE HIGN-DENSIRY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HOPE) UNLESS T 17 WS�WHEEL CHAIR RAMP
OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAR. R TFI N/F� NSA OR FOPMERLY
10. MINIMUM PRCH FOR ALL DEAN LINES SHALL BE 0,5B 1Y'A 18 MD. RON DO
" ELECTRIC. GAS,TELEPHONE AND CABLE T.V. SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED TABELS� 19 TREE
UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WiTH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY AGENCY HAANG .1.- 24 CBSE"AYON
JUR MACK.. 25 GANSM — --
ISDICTION .-BOD" EXISTING CONTOUR
26 PROPOSED CON70UR
12. STREET TREES SMALL BE PI-MNTED AT TWO (2� PER LOT UNLESS OTIFERSRSE NOTED ON
PLAN, SEE REQUESTED WAKES, 20 23 EWE OF EAVE.El -------------
13 FIRE ALARM BOX INSTALLATION AND -O�TONS) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TPXLml� WRBCM-G�FRL CURB —V=
RECITIREIVENTS OF TNE CITY OF SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT. 22
14, TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS INTO ORNEWAYS S�BE MADE USING 2 PROPOSES VLT FENCE
RADIUS GRANITE CURBS. P�PCSGD SPOT ELEVATION
15,STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION (TO BE SHOWN AT A LATER DATE) SHALL BE IN \y
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, OR.OTHER SURFACE FLUNA DIRECTION
�& THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD LAZARD AREAS MAHA
APPROVING AUTHORITY
S HI SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE I X ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD AS SHOWN ON
FLOOD I NSURANCE RATE MAIP NUMBER 2..BC.111C. V. REVISED lUly IB, 2.14,
SEAL
17. PROPOSED FOUNDATION UNDERDRAINS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE TOWARDS THE STREET. SMALL"
OPEN SPACE 2 27
NAUIRLI B
CNIOIF
CTFY OF Ski-EM -ES U.
...DK
PIL,ANNING BOARD VS-. 121071201S
3 FBI" N4 1- .11.1 S
2 o hMNWIYANIIlhNH
I ALL I-181. ;LIBBY,
W
x INDEX PLAN
NDUSI.OE "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
------------
ORMNEIC
P R
A,SAKAF DRISCOLL 7 At
18 WAULLAS
E ROAD
--------------- LYNN. MA 01901 VwalLLlAM
------ LC CENTS 36055,36056.35057 WILILLAM
APPLICANI, W-4 r(
-—------------------ NSO REALTY TRUST SPARAGE
76 �LLE STREET
PLAN SET INDEX LYNN, MA 01905
--------------------- PROJECT I OCU& 1wol=MAIN
SHEET 1: INDEX PLAN PLM RFFEMNCES� CLUARK AVENUE SALEM MIDOOETOIKMA01949
ESENACE. s BROAD
SHEET 2-3: DEFINITIVE PLANS ------------- �SESEX)RS RFF FAX:VNIT S39-M.
6 1) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-9 6 PARELS 7. B& 9
2) LAND COURT PLAN 7 59-X I w
SHEET 4-5: DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILES ----------------- 3) UAND COURT PLAN 7159-2 V 40' 80' INDEX SHEET I OF I
4) AN UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED -DEPINITNT SUBDIVISION PLAN. CHAPEL HILL, �EM.
SHEET 6-7: TOPOGRAPHIC PLANS WSRACHUSCTTS'RATED JUNE 28. 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 11, 2007 BY
RATE: —------ EASTERN LAND SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY SALEM PLANNING BOARD) S`ZA'Ll SHEET I OF I I
.111, 1,1.15
SHEET 8-1 1: DETAIL SHEETS
CLERKS C-RYFIN>TION ON -HE PLXN
�11 7159 DATE -- ---—---------- SEE PROFILE SHED I
@ CLERK OF THE CITY OF SXLEM 00
1� 8 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF A�PFI OF THIS PLKH By
7HE RANKING 30�1) HRS EEN RICEKD.0 RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE �13 TNXT NO AF'EAL WAS RECENTO
ORYS DURING THE TWENTY
NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEFT�NO REO.lGIlG OF END NOTICE
I CERTIFY THAT I HRNE CONFORMED
X.,.A GONRI THE RULES.0 REGULATIONS
07 THE REGISTERS 01 DEEDS 1.4
0 UN'. PRER%RING THIS PL.R.
Ir p -'V.
OPEN
_ART
r SPACE MLLIAMS VP GES LCCT
4/00
0
NI5
WRI
Z
RqUI
X... WL EMONENOY IF 1'.. CITFY OF SALEM
P�ANNUNG BOARD
SO ---—--—---—----
IF
12'
I ---—------ -—--—--—
RUE.PXHDEI DIRT UMOU
z12' --—--——-----------
"=: SIT. SIDERALK
IF. IF GRXWL�
T: RX" 2U..
;2 ..1'
LOAM & SEED
FF
C)
0 1"RXT
4*'-1
318- OR HOLE 1/2'
DEEP Xt�CTUI ---------------
[EXISTING GRADE POINT OF SURNEY
REFERENCE
-—--—-----—-------
-------—----
FXN IN 6'OF EXISTING SO,
N & REPYXE W/3" KINGS /A
Cp '� \ A TRAIL DETAIL CRUSHED STONE -T -
�\ , ---------
'IS, A,- — /� - I
A OYX (.NOT TO SCRLE)
DATE: ---—--—----
_XYOU'z
UNE
f
47-
H.-
FINISHED GRADE
GRANITE BOUND
DETAIL
al (NOT TO SCALE) S- DENOTES A GRAB-TE STONE 80. 0
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SD�
COMMON FILL WRI 6'OVER LOP
L
A IF RIC SlDE%%_K VARY VXRASLE
IF 7Zx.I" ORTE
CEOTEXYLE FABRIC 7.5
a .8 2'
(rP)
0 '1_1VEL LANDING DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
0! 15%. DES SLOPE
ON GRASS PLOT OR SOUTH RIDGE CIRCLE
1 3/8'TO 3/4� TOWARD STREET FOR
—50'VC -1.00% 50'vc MASHED GRAVEL--. MEET PBROPOSED RAMP DRAINAGE SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS
9 GRACHE AT END OF CURB GRABS PLOT QWNER
BARBARA DRISCOLL D
0,
0! ! 18 �E ROAD
0 0 X' HERR CORR HOPE LYNN. MA 01901
0.50
1,00 �+50 2+00 2,50 (HOI r�mia UP) GRANITE CURB LIAR, .1 N. LC CERTS 36055.35056,36057 -W,
LE. R,,,_ APPLICANT WHILNIAS
BEG REALTY TRUST SPARAGES
0.
��UNDISTUREED PLAN 76 OVI STREET
SOUTH CE ENT CONCRETE RAMP
5-0' 11 -LEVEL I-ANDING"WYRH LINN. MA 01905
DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL PROJECT 101
RIDGE REFERENCE
+ FOUNDATION "N__N_
POINT .1.1
w CIRCLE + 1.5% - SLOPE FOR DRAUNRGE CIARK AVENUE S&E IIIII..N..
2 7 M NA
+ + UNDERDRAIN ASSESSORS FFEIiEMCF- s
W�ORS.$39.
DETAIL WHEELCHAIR RAMP 6 FARELS-7. a & 9 .611013�.
Y 20' 40' go,
DETAIL PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 2
(NOT TO SCALE) NOTES
(NOT To SCALE)
CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE *0�5% kn�%1.-,;4 OFLA'4'EfERT)I
SHEET 5 OF 10
I"MR/ W 022
/"LL N
----------- -----------
/ -- / 1,�-Hl GEORGE
07-Ow
PRANil ES EPH
VL i N
7- 5 CACHE TRUST IUR H�SHF
07-0002
07-0076 & E
WUJAM O.ROE, JR.
07-.�
O7-ODc"ALRR
ROHARD I. OTGALY N,
03-01 7 -V HILL —OPrN SPAWI�
A, I CERTIFY THAT KLAE CONFORMED
olz- WITH THE RQUES AID REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
N A PREPARING THIS PI-AN
N, OPEN SPACE I
�k SLIP GES
,D7
OF
A.'A" D7
MIN
RM.I..
CTW OF SALEM
'IN
IN PLANNING BOARD
02-
N'l-
I'LL
—--—-----———
TRAAl 2014 It i DATE
I RELM-W TRUS
06_Wl SX T\ADEUSLZ&
FIAL�GA"A
DSJM
G.. _DO,
RAL., 4,11
ML N v
�NSEWATIONI
COM.SSIO.
24
%
10 (26)
cm-.
A A DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
ION ATIN A DRILL HOU TO BE SET�
ED LOW —
ZON UNE
NIL
I OATE
%,A
40
TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
-17HE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
fit
V- TS
SALEM, MASSACHUSET
k OWNER,
EARSIARA DMSOO�ET AL
18 KAU�E READ
LYNN.MA 01901
,DENTS 3W55'36056.3057 WILUAMS
CUERXS CERNIFICAMDA!ON ME PiJAhl RESIDENTIAL REEDEKTAL APPUCANT'
ZORE: ONE-FAMILY INOU151RIAL OLIE-FAILHLY NSD REALT)`TRUST SPARAGES
DATE: (Rl) (1) (Rl)OUUS7ER 76 OARMILUC STREET
LYNN. MA 019M G
1. CUORK OF ME ON OF SALEM, DO MINIMUM LOT `RDNPUGE: 100 FT ISO FT (NONE) PROJECT LOCUS
HERESY CERTIFY THAT ME NOTICE OF APPMEN&OF THIS PIAN MINIMUM LOT NOTH: 100 FT ISO FT (MONE) T =0101
ME PILLMMING BOARD�SEEN REOEIVED.AND RECORDED AT NIS MINIMUM LOT ARO, - 15.000 S V 40.000 SY, (NOME) OL,ARK AWNUE SALEM.
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING ME TWENTY LOT 00,SRACE ITY BUft-DING: 30% 45X 30% ASSESSORS REFERENCE- IS
MYS KW AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID METNEE. MAMMUM WIGHT OF miWING: 35 FT 4S FT 35 FT MAP 6 PARELS 7. 8 &9 .010539..
FRONT YARD: 5 FT 30 FT` go, TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET I OF 2
=N1.=m SIDE YARIT 0 IFT SO FT FT
M 3 "
OFF can MRIMUM REAR Y�. SO FT So FT 30 c SHEET 6 OF 10
lz_
TRAN 204
REALI LED!TX
FkDzL
JOIN
SPRO, I CERLIF� THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
EXIST WH WITH THE RJI-ES AND REGUI_ATIONS
�00�12�Ic 06-001,
WV- 1 II.,3��, SALEM OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
CONSEW.TION PREPARING THIS PIUNX�
COM SS10N
r -WIULWMS-4k-SPARZES Luc
u 4 3
-02m-
f
-PH
\Z' ED Cl� OF SALEM
LINE, PI-ANNIAG BOARD
22
//U`/
------------------------
MAXIM 01c.
PRX,MB,w
U7
SUWA 2 1\ —-----------
ISABELLE
06-00 1
------—--------
AT Al I/ ------—-------------
-n-
AF.1
UMRDF..
XWNW.,F..B,`. DATE:
AF FNm/
Z
a
AT Al�,IA/
MKXTAft X"TUMXX—�
�JAMES CONNICK v
Of-ooQ&
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
DENOTES A GFA,MITZ STONE BOUND
DATE� ---------------- WITH A DRILL HOU:TO BE so.
1. CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM W Y,
A THEEPLANNIRNG BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND R
ER BY CE VEY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
ECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECENED DURING TIE TWENTY
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
4 \'VOWS:
.4
SAN &
CITY CLERK ---- AGO IN Na FEWSKNI
CLERK
TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
o
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER-
AN EMIREARA DRISCOLL 7 AL
M, IS WAUUACE ROAD
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL LmN. MA 01901
LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY APPLICANT' WILIJAMS
(Rl) 00 (NI) CLUSTER W-d
NSD REALTY TRUF SPARAM
M:WN�MUM LOT FRONTAGE Im FT m5o FT (NONE) 76 OAXNNUE STREET
N
MUM UOT WIDTH: 10D FT i5o FT (NONE) -4 LIAN. MA 01905
PRDJFCI LODES'
T
MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 SY. 40.000 S.F. (NONE)
a LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% OT.1 CLARK AMENUE SAUEM, W
,C MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT
9 ASSESSORS REFERENCE' s
I MN;M M FRONT YARD: 'S FF 30 FT is FT MAD 6 PARELS 7. 8& 9 F.010$39-.�.
1 30 FT 10 FT 0' 29 40' so TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 2 OF 2
M:NMou SIDE YARD: 10 FF
MINIMUM HEAR YARD w FF SO FT 30 P,
SALE 1"-4 T 7 OF 10
U,B�
---AS ST",20115 SHEE
STANDARD H�ORANT TO Ej�CII OF
A NOTE SAEM REQUIREMENTS
CONC ETE THRUST BLOCK TO BE USED ONE,WHERE IT
F* VCRTICAL GRANITE GUIDE, TIE W WILL AW ON UNDISTURBED EARTH, PUMPER CON ECTON-\\ BREAKANA� FLANGE
BRICK SHELF WALL OF MANHOLE FIN19H GRADE, AlERIAL VARIES USE RESTRAINED JOINT FITTINGS (.EGALUG OR FACES �OAD
SLOPE I-/FT BINDER COURSE APPROVED CQUAL,)WHERE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS 11
UXA�CEFTABLE 0 SIDEWALK
TOP COURSE T- SIZE OF BLOCK OR MEG�UG TO BE DESIGNED FOR 1.5
71MES NORMAL OPERATING PRESSURE
RICK S+Tj
WALL
Lop T�E
E IFT
VARIES
B B !tC EDGES70HE
BASE COURSE FINISHED STREET GRADE
MIN
FOR PAVE.ENT MAKEUP. CRUSHED STONE N
SEE PAVEMENT NOTES MALIDE STANDARD
P PRE ARE VAFVE BOX AND COVER
RE LRA,�l,A. 6-WN.
ACCESS TUBE
BRICKS ON 4 MILE POLY OVER STONE WCURTIFY THAT I -AVE CONFORMED
EDGE (2XB EARNED) ITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
MASONRY RING OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
BRICK CHANNEL APPLES VERTICAL GRANITE CURB CONCRETE PREPARING THIS PLAN,
TO DROP CONNECTIONS AS THRUST atoc�
WELL AS CONVENTIONAL. DETAIL ---------------
6- WE VALVE
(NOT TO scmUE) IF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS WICL71ALMS & SPARAGES LIEC
USED, DO NOT BLOCK CHAIN
PLAN SLOPED GRANITE CURB
AS SP In
IN, S�C�TEGSL E
OR
jW4 �FAL WATER NAN
EA To
-P P COU RSE PROVIDE % CUSIC YARD OF
'SHELF ELEVATION WE AS _-R ED Co.R�E ANCHORING TEE SELECTED 2'STONE - TO 6"
SLOPE 1-/F7. CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE� BE E B AD ED CR US.ED MECHANICAL Jot S PROVIDE 12" SQUARE BY S-INCH THICK AB�HYDRANT GRAIN
WALL OF MANHOLE ST HE E CONCRETE BASE UNDER N`FDRAN`F
POILRED CEI BE CITY OF SAILEM
G COMPACTED TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT FI_ANINING BOARD
GU.CR.E
BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL- CONNECTION FOR HIGH
OR LOW SERVICE LINE —---—-----—
8, MINIMUM SLOPED GRANITE CURB DETAIL
DETAIL (NOT TO SME)
12' MINIMUM SCREENED (NOT TO SCkE) -----------—------
GRAVEL BASE,
BRICK ON ENE *UNDISTURBED EARTH --------------------
SECTION A�A ---------------------
CONCRETE COLLAR --------------
V RON CHECK DAM WHERE SHOWN ON IIJAN BITUMINOUS CORE.TOP SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT.
MANHOLE FRABE AND 1. COURSE AS SPECIFIED APP11 TACK COAT
CONES AS SPECIFIED E IS71NG GROUND SURFACE OR BT. CONC. BINDER r ---------------------
FX'SHED GRADE CGURSE AS SPECIFIED
12' EXISTING PAVEMENT
GRAVEL BASE AS SPECIFIED
BRICK FOR GRADE ,:H, 4 1-2'CRUSHE
ADJUSTMENT yt ST HE COMPACTED SUBGRADE EXISTING BASE
----------------
PRECAST TRARSITION SECTION
OR BARREL SECTION WITH
PRECAST TOP SI-AB DATE,
VA.RIES (SEE PLAN)
,tI .N.
RUBBER -0--RING GASKET
OR PREFORMED FLEXIBLE
4-0' UNLESS OTHERWISE- /—JOiNT SEALANT AS SPECIFIED GRASSED �WALE
INDICATED ON DRAWINGS QNI� 70 SC.E) FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED PAVEMENT MATCH
MANHOLE RUNGS �MULTIPUES OF 1'.2.3.4.5. DETAIL CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
OR 6 LENGTHS AS REQUIRED (NOT TO SCA-E) CAM
CLERK OF THE OFF OF SALEM. DO
hRE� CERTF�THAT THE NOTICE OF APPRINAL OF THIS PLAN BY
8' MINIMUM
THE PILANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS
SEE PIPE CONNECTION
S.Eff EL TJON WE AS DETAILS THIS SHEET OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE, DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
/-8-MINIMUM
ANGLE FIRI STAI�1ID"ORD IFIVE ON Rift BOUND SIBIAl'
SAIJES PLI BIN TIRE CONTOUR WOOD POST
12' MINIMUM pREAOuw m SALE I
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM SLAB SCREENED GRAVEL I
SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2-REBARS. STEM PICOEB!I�
THE MANHOLE BARREL BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL wax6vAges lk To r PETER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED
SECTION WALL OR TOP SLAS
WBICHEVER IS GREATER.
DATE
SECTION B-8 No. REVISION T
UNDISTURBED EARTH DETAIL SHEE
PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE ANCHOR FABRIC WITH
�M'
SOIL.TAMP BACKFILL. "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
DETAIL Fit GlIt
r EXISTING GROUND
(NOT TO SCALE) SURFACE DIRECTION OF FLOW SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER
W,,NA DRISCOLL ET AL
DOM la
CARRY FABRIC+ L,,,wWjUAcE ROAD
5 1 MA 01901
INTO FRENCH N WILUAMS
LC CENTS 36055"56056136057
.00�POS AEPUGAINT
00D POSTS NSD RIPLI TRUST spARAGES
R_. Go
8*-0'O.C. MAX. 76 OAKVILLE STREET G
1-2' CRUSHED LYNN. MA 01905 um.O.MNI
STOWE T .1.1
TEMPORARY HAY BALES UAL w WNUENWUAAWIAW
FLOW 6" MIN. %
SILTFENCE W s `BQW,L MIND
rp m\ F.NNO 13IIHMN
DETAIL DETAIL RLA, h NAp-6 PARSES 7. 8&9
NOT TO SCALE RAL DETAIL SHEET I OF 3
(NOT TO SCALE) .1111, SEALE:NOT TO SCA�
STONE CHECK DAM
6 SHEET 8 OF 10
(NOT TO SCALE) AUGUI 14,2015
PANEMENT TYPICAL H20 INSPECTION PORT DETAIL
40' LAYOUT
6
. ....... FILCOIR DOX MAKE AND LID
5 1 1 1 1 1 WSCH40�011 EENANI R,FS 011 ORIBILI
SIDE- 2,5'! 24 FAIE.ENT 2 5 1 SIDE- SGRrS NPE :�
WISG.CAPSCRENUO
WALK ;S ,,S WALK RISM 24" SOUPRE
CLOSURE
tT
CLASS'C'CI :TC-T,\
:r:.,.�PAGSMENTGQGBASE IMIX COMPACTED FILL
`ERT
GR��U'OR.5'LOFID HVv MN SPI,COMPACTED,NIL-
R IN, 'm CONNECTOR
Do,-
I.MON. FLnRF.IC
/I- FOOT 316' FOOT-- AROUND=3�AND SIM XK.
WIN 8 �
Go GEN DERGH MXNDATOW;SCUTI MR IONGINESIRTS
1-2 RICH
CESSION
Go MMMHED CRUSHED 5 1 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
C STOMEABONE NO
6- _;AM �'N'GUI-I I MID BELON CULTECRO WITH THE RULES A 0 REGULATIONS
OF T.IiE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
& SEED GAS .0
N S EMIR OR CHAMBERS PREPARING THIS PI-ARL
2" ORAI ED 6 CRARMSIGA-110
HENEATHR RIE
I'T - -I-
GRAVT' 1 1 2 NOER A
UNPE 1-1 8' DAM�PKC ?EI 11 2LIN.0 ED.
BTUMNOJS F.ER 2/ GRAVEL INFERNAI.MANIFOLD OR SITED ST N . . . . Yoatw� ic Sip CH Luc
CONCRETE C'LG WATER PIPEPER CUUIEC RECHARGER 33GXL NO SURROUND!IC CH BE
1 112- TOP IF MID INSPECTION PO . . . . .
2 '/2. BI k DER MMXINLET. ASSEMBLY FR
12' GRAVEL BASE 24 INCNEST 14 INCH WXSIRE0 CAGENG, BOTTOW TO FINAL ELE�A
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION STORE GENEATHAND (THIS CHAMBER KLY)
TC SME) AROUNDCHARIBERIBED TYPKCILCULTECCHAMBERA
A CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY PLAN VIEW INSPECTION PORT TINTERNALCOUPUNG
NOTE: THE CULTEC MODEL SHOWN HERE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE
EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
CULTEC NO.201-PGL�TIOUI LINER TO
_PAWMMT BE PLACED BENEATH
ST= OM4 RKL,`.FEED CORRECT. 40Z.NKIN�FILTIBIPAISRIC
COMPACHED FILL r AROUND STOTHE WHEN UTIL ING SISK COMPACTED HILL 1 2 INCH DA ARMNDSTOINE.TOPANDSLIDES
ANCJT�C N HEAW DUTY CHMMBBR I WA;. MANDATORY
0 G`S) IOUZZ66"MIN MAN' CRUS'HED HMLVFC2XPSE000fKNECTOR
RECHARG XL. MIN
GED MRSARESPECIFTED 10�Z64—1 MIN,
MIN
M
A 1 low
C�TSKD�.�S OCKERli TO F.KH
RUIZ MOS—1
lzr="
A F- IN
C X...T MAK`
I &DEPORFALTOSECUR
ENGINEER
MUST WERTOSPARTHEEBUTRElMOTH IN FIELD XXnI Kc.
F12""S"'M A,NEEDED
4i T "
__-�4 SIDE PCIRTALS
GFURN,
CULTEC INTERNAL MANIFOLD DETAIL l2v r"—1 T`? S8wtI*73 U.7tinil 11
GDKSRA_�
W`URA..,EI.WNP.p=.TNP
I FREE S'..1 WM,,.�R INKTLAPGR X.GEWPN. UOCM_S1AM.
2 NTXXFKG.FOK IN. IN T-1. W. ,TIR Y N__ .."'..�FGXTRAFRC�OOR
.lIONS.
3 TONGUE MID CROOKE JONT SQUED XPH B�ROUN, CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SEDIMENT AND OIL SEPARATOR FINISHED GRACE TCF OF 1.5:1 CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
DETAIL UNMED PAVED SWPE -2:1 SLOPE DATE:
(GOT TO SCALE) EXISTING GROUND Cj� OF SALEM
SURFACE FLAT STONES PI_ANNING BOARI) 1, CLERK Or THE CITY Or SALEM. DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN By
X FOR WAA LIKE THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIED AND RECORID AT THIS
CONFIGURATION DURING TH UNION
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPOA_WAS RECENED TY
PRUNE AS FIELD TAKING AND SUB-BASE MATERIAL -—----—---------—- BATS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECDRD:NG OF SAID NOTICE.
DIRECTED BY OWNER TO
INFIRM APPEARANCE COMMON FILL MATTER -------------
(RETAIN NORMAL TREE
S.APE) CCMMON FILL MATERIAL 1.5
MAX, SLOPE -—— --—--—--------
TRUNK FLARE
JUNCTION PLANT MEE WARNING TAPE FILTER
' R ——-----
L
1-2*� EXISTING
T7 JOINTS,
GWE
3' UA�R SHREDDED PIKE PERPENDICJLAR
DARK MULCH TO TO TO SLOPE
GATE
DOER EWE OF SAUCER NO MDISCK�
KEEP MULCH 2'FROM
TRUNK
v EXISTING GRACE RIG NAL IN BOULDER DETAIL SHEET
CUT AND REIA� UIRLAP IST MIN CLEAPkNCE 12"MINIMUM SEE GROUND OR SIZE SCOLD THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
IN SCREENED GRVWL NOTE I BELOW COMPACTEC
FROM TOP 1/3 OF SCREENED GFA�L PLACED AGAINST Fl� Z PROPOSED SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
ROOT SALL. IF
UNDISTU BED IDES AND 8070M OF GRACE
VONSIODEGRADNBLE, TRENCH." SEESNOTE I STORE BARBARA DRISCOLL ET &
RIUNM COMPLETELY. ------------- 18 WIUNCE ROAD
SLOPE SIDES Or HOLE
E SIVER OR GRAIN 8T MIN SCREENED CRAVEL BEDDING N
I I � , LYN , MA 01901
11 11 SACKFUL AS PER BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPF DATE LC CwRTS 36055,36056.36057 4S
SPECIFICATION 12*MINIMUM APPLICANT
DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW UNDISTURBED EARTH NSD REALI MST
C(�& WSPUAGIES
THREE TIMES WIDTH OF FOOTBALL 76 OAKKILLEI
FOOTBALL. NOTES STREET
LYNN. MA 905
LOCUS .89 NOUN,..VNXUET
1, FOR PIPES OTHER 4. TING. SELECTED COMMON FILL MAY HE USED MOM PERFORKIED 75% OF BASE T .-HU
MID-DAMETER OF PIPE TO 12�XBOVE TOP OF PIPE UNOMDRAN ROCKS Tc BE CLARK ANIENUE SALEM. MA
ASSESSORS REFERENCE: AKRE,0.)S39-.
IODC L35 OR s of.MoNLEO'W",
DECIDUOUS TREE TRENCH DETAIL FOR GREATER MAP 6 PANELS 7. 8& 9
T PLANTING DETAIL SHEET 2 OF�3
GRAVITY PIPE RIP—RAP DETAIL sc�
DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE)
(NOT TO S�) (NOT TO SCA.F) I SHEET 9 OF 10
e i4 �:_7u"_-,OT T,-T 0 2015 1
MAN AWTHOU,EMERS EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FRAME&MAKE FRAME&WA7E
FN!DLED MADE--- OR FINISHED GRACE FINISHED MADE 1INSHEO CRADE
OR CKS AND MORTAR �YNIUKN 1.RECIFE MANHOLE ITHWARE AND 8' KIDDIAR KNOR-AN
T 6 MIENE AND MCI
G;INGH FLAT.10F COVER AS SPECIFIED
TO BE USED 0 MAKE VEND T. 1.BE USED TO MAKE
MAN ADJUSTMENTS FPCOT AN PRIME ADD MOTTAR
H-20 LOAD 4 MIN (IYP) CHADE AlUOSTMENTS TO BE NEED TO MAKE
CONCRETE COLLAR MIN 8'FLAT TW--` WERUER TO PRCYMDE� CFADE_ADA�'STMENTS
T M'F ADD M
To BE NEED,
OR ME A._S'
I BE 12-INE1 MEMS TO
P DUE 0 AD
72 tl DIAMETER BRICK FOR GRACE :F PRECAST N RISER �PPSRT AN H-20 LOAD
AU,BESTMENT V., ENDY
PRECAST TRANSMON COMICAL SEE�NOW" KE LEE To
ECT OR BARREL KPI TO BE
PPECAST IN RISER
C'CH
SECT MYTH PRECAST c
BLAT 1111 TOM SIB BHER XGTNN SMIGH
DODGE
—RUBBER -0. RING
OR-CAST CONCRETE 0 Z
INFILTRATION SAPN TRAP RECK PAEEL WOR ORIFICE GASKET R PH--
FORMED FUCKSUE
S ER OUTSIDE OF PIPE 'M
JI EII LVYEL +2-CLEARANCE WI.R MED...
BUTE,PIPE
MANHOLE RUNGS CATCH BASIN TRAP NERMAL DUTEDT OF FILE
W.U. .2-CLEARANCE
MULTIPLES OF BASE SEGNI
OUTUDE OF TYPE 1,2.3.4,5 OR 6 IT LEVEL
*2'OUCARANEE LENGTHS AS RED 0 CATCH BASE,TRAP
SCREDIED M.PCL 4'-0" UNLESS OTHERWISE-
UNDISTURBED EARTH INDICATED ON DRAWINGS
SAM MCRON
(2)DRAIN 12HYPIMUM
MANHOLE COWYE MEMNON CRAVCIL J.E11TI EARTH
12' MINIMUM SCREENED GRAVEL PRECAST DOUBLE—GRATE CATCH BASIN ,No
DO AIN OUTLET SCREENED GFA�L UNGETURMID EARTH
PIPE DETAIL
THICKNESS OF 8070M SEAB IN T TO SCALE)
S 3' MINIMUM CONCRETE FILL GO
N L NOT BE LESS THAN COBLE GRATE
TH=HOLE BARREL PRECAST CATCH BASIN
SECTION WALL OR TOP SLAS
WHICHIEVOR IS GREATER -UNDISTURBED EARTH DETAIL
PRECAST CATCH EAVO (NOT TO SCALE)
ROCKS AND
To BE USED
OR ARE ADJUE"
M
To
T
N
ED
M
D'
4
T
N
A
A
T
ED
R
A
S
MAO'
C
H
P
IN
RI
H
S
J 4'X 20'OPENING
GI.mR
OR E CA
N'LNEAFGTH EARN TRAP TOM PA.iL
'2 WI C.,
.REC'ED BUELL
E��OMANHOLE COI
PRE.AE 7� EVAN, SINGLE GRATE
PLAN PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE LEHNG STRIKES
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL CNATE
DETAIL (NOT TO SUALLE)
(HOT TO SCALE) CINEY OF SALEM
-�Noy EACK. PLANNING BOARD
�,NSTNLUED BODY ON
THE CRAT AND FRAME
I CERTIFY TI I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
Or THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
FREPMRING THIS PLAN
-------------------
SE�ION CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAIN WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LEE
A� BRET —-—--— ---
V Or S;�TION .... . 'T
CLERK OF THE CITY Or SALEM. M I ICED ME
HEREBY CERI THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
_�_N Sr
2-0- THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS o' M�C.TH --—-—------------
OFFICENAND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY 0. M ARE
DAYS EV AFTER SUCH RECEIPT MD RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE LEWEEW MOAR --—--—-—--—-—--—-
4. --—--------------------
DOWN THROAT ORAMBE SEDIMENT RMP GO
CURB INLET SECDON OPEN ONE. HE EQUAL
CURB I SECTOR ELEVATION
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP DATE ---—----
PRECAST DETA�L
CATCH t r PRECAST (HOT TO SCALE)
BASIN SIECTION CATCH
A_W MEN TO.MONTE BASIN IN
CURB I SECTOK
3 3 FLANGE BATCH EASTIN FRAME PLAIN
AND CASCADE MADE LEGROOM
A MK'200 DO APPOROMED COLAL REEDER
WON THROU GRANITE
N,LER,ROBOT DOE EFTQ-2)
CUP. UET SECTION
T, CATCH BASIN FRAME A..GRATE�NAUL BE MODEL DETAIL SHEET
LV- J-2 DOME WHY LK12.GRATES ON%OPES
7 "THE WOODLA
SUMS AND MORI AND'EI GRABCS 0 LOW MOM BY LEINARDY
. . . .. TO BE USED 10 MAKE NDS"SUBDIVSION
DAN BY.ONE.BE BROCKTON.MA 01 E011,
GRACE ADLUSTMEM
FRAME TE BROKE AND MORTAR a. r OOET IAT SINDER COURSE AND RESET AT I- SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
24' TO BE USED TO MAKE BELOW FINISH PAVEMENT)
OWNER
CRACK ADUESIMENTS SPI AS AND MORTAR BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
TO BEE DRED NO MAKE 18 WALLACE READ
4er III WI ARE Rl�IBAREFUT MADE MATE RA ON. LYNN. �01901
FRAME GRI 2 ILE CENTS 3W55,36D56,36057
A j
BOCKS ME FEAR E*.T APPUCANT'
OPRECAST
GAP rPRI�I M TO BE ORED MIC
PRECAST TO MAKE To, WILLIAMS
CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN TOP Z7 GRACE 9 CATCH BASIN NSD REALLY TRUST
IN r
CATCH BAOS WA SPARAGB
75 CAMILLE STREET
RANEFE V�
N. MA 01905
ELUATION SECTION ELEVATION SECTIQ LOCUS
A A-A A-A CLARK AVENUE SALEM. MA s W.NRATHOR.
GRANITE CURB INLET GRANITE CURB INLET MONP I PARELS 7. R I BAMLOMQI�.IN PIT
DETAIL OFETO DETAIL SHEET 3 OF 3
DETAIL SCALE IN SCALE
(NOT TO SCALE)
(NOT TO SCA_E)
SINGLE GRATE COUBLE GRATE )v AUGUST 14,201 S SHEET 10 OF 10
A
PAVEMENT TYPICAL H20 INSPECTION PORT DETAIL
40' LAYOUT
FLOOR BOX FORMS AMID UD
S' I VSCK,QPMCCR NEEMAREIINMOREQUAL
STOE— 2� ETIE.ETT SIDE— WISS
PASS AkA FIBER 24' SQUARE /
CLOSURE
WALK P-OTI ...... SCROB PRO'RIM
PAMOSE
............ CLASS'C" COr To"
"'S COMPACTED FILL
ERT,AL OR SLOFFI FEW HM_MFCAl m COMPACEPIR Is
'RAN",CLINGING 1* CONNECTOR
3 8 1 1
4 Os�NON-MBOMEN PETER FABRIC
E T"
WMINCERITH ISO
.T 3/ - ���L Os
3/8-. 1 6 FOOI AWDUMDSTEO IS TOPANDVORS
0 U C DE 4 INCH MANDATORD. TDOM MR ENGTREIRM
0 DESs
00 11T� MINISONED CRUSHED
E NISC I CERTIFY THAT I NI CONFORMED
GAM 3
_;AX, 5 c WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
I S I AND Sam F DEEDS IN
A, SEED GAS > ONDU,
I THE REGISTERS 0
SIDEWALK ON CHAIMMERS PREPARING THIS PI_AN.
2" DROJR BOTH GOES BENEATWRECHARMRSSI
I"
F DAM, P,C /,�- mix
GRAs I I N
TUPE 1-11
SITUMNOJS B, AN SCAERT 2,SELL INTERNAL MANIPOILD E T LLIAs & SPARAGES LLC
C C LIE C I.D WATER FIRE PER SURR W
ON 1 2 R�OEL
1 12' TO MIX ENGINEER DESION HEAVf OLTY CHAI AN:D I T
y R
2 1/2 STPDER A E
12"GRAMEL`EASE 24 INCI 1-2 INCH WASHED CRU HBO BOTTOM T FI AL ELE% -1
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SPONE BENEATH AND 5 (T P LET L
C Y`(PKJU.CULTEC CHANSER
A— "—TI—8 CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY PLAN VIEW INSPECTION PORT W INHERNAL COUPUNG
0_0�
NOTE: THE CULTEC MODEL SHOWN HERE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE
EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
CULTEC NO At POLWEEMJEBE UNER TO
0 BE PLACED SEIREARM A OZ.NONH*hDMEN FILTER FARRIC
CRI W= F—PAVEMENT
SP% IMMON EILEEN FASSBC HM2VPC�MWCCMMECTCRW TOPANS SIMS
24'DIA COMPACTEO FILE ORRACTED FILL 14'..
AMOO UMONG C
CHMANTER IMMURNALIMANEXTED WASHES MANDAVORY
T O'ER HI DUTI
T3 MUOCS r ABOUND TOM RMI MIN. -FINISHED stUSMD
RECHNINGER NO STONE SFEWEED
RUN MEW HEA"nm=ER
A—J B uITTIASS"
MIN, BsGrWI
EXRMD ACCESS WWAS TO smss,a,,Ax
MAUL
r F-1
Is, , PIPE PER LI 1—1 AWL
ITT wPosaX., NPOL
ENGINEER DESIGN
SIMI SIDE POREAL TO SE CUT
OV"X 12- HOPES, IOM,HMv
OPENINO wl LNERTOWANTHBEHRUMBEOGIDTH
_T Ss'X 24- A OFTHE SWITTEM SEECANTHEMMOV FC24 FEW CONNECTOR ILTIRRITTAIM,
F�24 FEW CONMECTORS AND AS NEEDED
4-13' S 86, ME FORTALS 7`1B. STUT 11473 RMI .20 BUT SRI
L CULTEC INTERNAL MANIFOLD DETAIL
W,THAPPLOPSHWASPORME.I.....
THIPPASE.."OR.ASTMAGs MENS,HOETHS.
MOSCURSENTREOPMENNED ..MWALEMPNAMNSNU.T.�..
OCROSETE: 51.PS MINIMUM ATTOR 2. A..,..
DES.O.FOR P-J.HMOTMI IN N_lS Y sWU_ ...NP.SURT,NN`I FERRALREGULA�OMPLA's
.WK,H.
3�MNI AMID GIROME MET GLASS WIT BUTYL ISSIN. CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SEDIMENT AND OIL SEPARATOR FINISHED GRACE TCP OF 1.51 CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE Is
DETAIL UNHAVtO PAOED SLOP' CITY OF SALEM DATE:
(NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING CROON
SURFACE FLAT STONES PILANNING 801 1. OLSEN OF THE CRY OF EATON. DO
A FOR WA L UNE MEREBY CERTII THAT THE NOTTCE OF APPROVAL Of THIS PLAN BY
CONFIGMATION TH E PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEV D AMID RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT No AMP,W� RECE�'EO BURNS THE EMENW
PRUNE AS FIELD PAVING AND SLI MATERAL
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
DIRECTED By OWNER TO
IMIPROVE APPEARANCE COMMON FILL MATERIUM, -----—-—---
(RETAIN NORMAI TREE
SHAPE) COMMON FILL MATERIAL sl- 1 5
SLONE
TRUNK FEARS
JUNCTION: PLANT MEE WARNING TAPE FILTER
1_2'ALIGNS EIGSTING FABRIC
GRACE JDINTS
TO SLOPE
21 3' LAYER SHREDDED PINE PERNENDICJILAR
PARK MULCH TO TO
OUTE EDGE OF SAU OR
KEEPNsXUUCH 2�FRC)CM —------—--
TRUNK DETAIL SHEET
MIN, BOULDER
EXISTING GRAM 12' MINIMUM SEE BRIG MAIL SIZE 500LB "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
8- MIN CLEARAINCE GROUND OR
CUE AND REMOVE EURW IN SCREENED GI NOTE I BELOW CO.PACTEC
FROM TOP 1/3 OF FILL PROPOSED —--—---—- SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
WIDE GALL IF SCREENED GAGOVEL PLACED AGAMNST CRU MED,
UNDISTURBED SIDES AND 9070M OF GRACE OWNER,
MONSIODECRADABLE. STONE,
TRENCH. SEE NOTE I BARBARA DRISCOLL F AL
REMOVE COMPUETEL�. 18 WALLACE ROAD
SLOPE SIDES OF ROLE SESER OR DRAWN 8" MIN SCREENED GRAVEL BEDDING
L"N, AA OHI[H
BACKIFILL AS PER BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE, 01 WILLL4,MS
TO CLIMB 36055,36
SPECIFICATION 12'MINIMUM CALL: APPUCANY' W-MIN C
UNDIMMED PAPER
DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ME REAs TRUST SPARAGES
FOOTBALL NOTES 7 0
TBREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTRALL 6 AMMILLE STREET
L�N. NA 01905
1. FOR PIPES OTHER THAN PVC.SELECTED COMMON FILL MAY BE USED FROM PERFORATED 75% OF BASE SEAL locus T =_01
VNDERDRUJN ROCKS TO BE WRI
MID-DIAMETER OF PIPE TO 12'ABOVE TOP OF FREE CLARK AMENUE SALEM. MA .,NAoI9N
DECIDUOUS TREE IOOC LES OR S
i GREATER BER..
PLANTING TRENCH DETAIL FOR NASSNULA
DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 3
f GRAVITY PIPE
DETAIL RIP-RAP DETAIL S�N
(HOT TO scAu:)
v (NOT TO SCAILE) INOT TO SCALF) IT SHEET 9 OF 10
Hr.LVE 14,2015
o
Is
N LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED CLERKS CERTIOCATION ON THE PLAN
I SOCTIO V A I f WHICH INQUIRIES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY DATE: -----------------
(230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF.ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS
SHOWN OV PILANS. 1. CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. 00
13? HERESY CERTIFY TI-AT TOE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAR4 BY
2.SECTION V PAO WHICH REOUJRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 MET IN THE PILMNJNC BOARD HAS ?ECN RrCENED AID RECORDED AT TRIP
LENGTH. AND IN PLACE THEREOF,ALLOW A LENGTH OF 108903 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN OFFICE AND THAT NO APP--Al WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY
ON PLAN& DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAD NOI
1SECTION V RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH SECURES STREET TREES TO BE 3
C�PER. DO FEET ON CENTER.AND. IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOL —------------------
C.TY CLERK
NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS USE DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS.
LOCUS
I CER"THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
'TH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REG�STERS OF 01 11
vk� LOCUS PREPARING THIS PLAIN,
["=800 -------------------
WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
NOTES
GI `�ES UJOANO I GTGE P
III-OK, I �UJION `.l PA,=
JOH,�`G'U /GAL I,EAL�
LE LARY ITS&PGRA
1.VERTICAL DATUM UNKNOWN (SEE N07 2) P= , ME AAUAK
07-WIB .1-PAG, AGWKC IR
U-XX.
2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES ARE AS SHOWN ON THE PREVIOUSLY MIRRLGN� L, LEGEND OF SYMBI AND AOSIREIIIIATIONS
APPROVED DEFINITIVE SUSOMSION BY THE CIPY OF SALEM (MARCH 3. 2008 XG 6
DECiBON) ENTITLED -DEFINITAE SUBDIVISION PLAN. CHAPEL HILL, SAUEM. HART.11 GAY
MAS CHILI DATED JUNE 28. 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26. GAS3 GATE
EA
2007 BY EASTERN LAND SURVISY, MONITORING WELL
3, WETLAND RESOURCE MCA BOUNDARIES WERE DELINEATED By WILLIAMS & 2 3 TIRE HYDRANT
SPARAGES )/1 4 OPEN SPACE 1 WATER WE If
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND
DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. JUTPRG,K CATCH SIGN DDRAI A
SFOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. E.1.
THE ENGINEER SPI BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF MY UTILITIES FOUND WARTO
LINTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE 'T UTILITY PO-E Z),
REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 6 LIGHT I.LE
5 TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT BE HEAT PATCHED. 13 1
DEMN MANIPME @
6. AL� WATER MAINE S�U- BE B"DAMETER CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED 14
DUCTILE IRON (C.L.D.1, ) 12 15 7 TEL/ELE-. MANHOLE
7. Al.L GINNON SEKER LINES SHAUL BE S" DIAMETER SON 35 WE PIPE 16 8 9 10 11 SUPER MAAROLE os
8. WrER AND SEWER SI-.A-L HE CONSTRUCTED WITH A KNIMUM HORIZONTAL COAC-CONCRETE
SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTCAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES 17 SBDH � S70NE BOUND DRILL HOLE
SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE MIER AND SEWER LINES CROSS. 1.IU.
I R.TY'BUX, END. FOUND
9 ALL STORM DRAINS SHI BE NIGH-OENSO�. POLYETHYLENE PIPE QHDPE) 18 NOR. HMO CAP GAMP
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON FI-AN.
N/F. NOW OR FORMERLY
10. MINIMUM PITCH FOR ALL GRAIN LINES SHALL BE OS%
IRC, � IRON ROD
�T IN 19
11, ELECTRIC GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE T.V. SERVICES SHALL BE 24
BE.
.-NGIl 25 0
INSTAJTED UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WON THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY RA-.11 IFIE
A C "'IN
GEN Y HAVING JURSDICTICN. 26
EXISTING CONTOUR
12 STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT TWO (2) PER LOT UNLESS 20 23 PROPOSED CONTOUR
OTHERWISE NOTED 0. PLAN. SEE REQUESTED WSIVER.
13 FIRE ALARM BOX INSTALLATION AND LOCATION(S) SNALL BE IN - 22 .1 EDGE OF SAVEMEN1 G,
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SAUER FIRE 21
DEPARTMENT. VOICTICIL GRANITE CURB VGO
14, TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS INTO DRIVEWAYS SFMJU- BE PROPOSED SILT PENCE
MADE USING RADJUS GRANITE CURBS. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
15. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION (TO BE SHOWN AT A LATER CATE) SNALL BE MANA S
IN ACCORDANCE WON THE c"Or SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PVEUC WORKS. G., I URFACE FLOW DIRECTOR
OR. OTHER APPROVING AUTHOPUTT .�-XOO
16 -HE SUWECT PROPERTY DOES NOT UP WqHflN A SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS (SPHAA) SUBJECT TO INUNDAITION BY THE 1%ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOOD AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAE NUMBER OPEN SPACE 2 27
25001 MAP REIVISED JULY M 2014,
RECEIVED
AlIrl Fot ou,
AWI� CII OF SALEM
.-KK
0P-GNXR PILJMNING BOARD CE PLANNING&
E)Prc:wpl PI=P-
------------—------
LY01 D
---——-----------------
wow
C/o. INDEX PLAN
NOI
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
PLAN SET INDEX OWNER,
SHEET 1: INDEX PLAN BARBARA DRISCO-L ET 4
2 IS WALLACE READ
SHEET 2-3: DEFINITIVE PLANS LYNN. MA 01901
----------------------- LC COSTS 36055,36056.36057 WILLLAMS
APPUCAN'r-
SHEET 4-5: DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILES
NED REALITY TR ST SPARAGES
76 CA.L-E STREET C—
SHEET 6-7: TOPOGRAPHIC PLANS LYNN. MA 01905 0
a PROJECT LOCUS' T ...N --N-
9 SHEET 8-10: DETAIL SHEETS CLARK AVENUE SAILEM. MJk RGUEHO
ASSESSORS REFERENCE KNOWS 070 VIIHOOR.
TC s
6 PARELS 7. 8 & 9 33"G.
9 40- SW 160, INDEXSHEET 1 OF I
DATE: I I
SCALE,V-80'
SHEET I OF 10
AUGUI 14,2015
7 729��.F.
2,973 s7s.
11,127 S.F.
LOT
el 9- .798 S.
LOT G', FLOT 9F
1 7,99A S.
LOT 16 PAP
A
W�ENT S6, A74 L.7
1,,"1.2'
A.
LOT 17
B2�SX. A�_
A
A. A
A
LOT I a
,40 ':2
8,516 S.F. 2.'
--P 21 116
AH I I
2014 -�"Py 4; N S
�TY TRUS WOODLA:
'Z-6 ROAD CERTrFY THAT I M� CONFCR.EO
)7Z_ X 0019 TADEUSZ& WITH THE RULES AND REGUILATIO.S
06 DS
JDANNA A.'Ha
BARCI.O�Kl i'?�l .' 6�' - - 1HE,.R.E61STERS OF D IN
1 0' DE
06-0017 LOT 19 A SALE. IRCF
AR THIS PI-AN.
A'
CONSERNATION
COMMISSI N
31627 S.F. 'TV 0
Ir ' I LOT 24 06-0011
4 -------------------
"llo A. 2,636 S.R Gi I ,
LOT 25 WILLIAMS & S?ARAGES LLD
1 10,4 7.904 S.F..
0
V4 LOT 26
A 7.853 S.F.
A. A
S, LOT 23 A
20 8.251 S.F.
14.7 S.F A. A",
L-1A.
A LOT 22 1. .....
LOT 2 7 630 S F __S D LOCANA
��AL
91�S.I F. Zot4E LINE
&I
PA"I"
SURYA& CITY OF SALEM
I SABELLE MAYO
06-0015 PILANNING BOARD
'A
l< —---------
LOT 27
147.992 S.F.
OPEN SPACE 2 -----------
AREA=135,070 S.F.
——-—--------
(47.500± S.F. WETI_ANDS) A
--------- -----------
----——--—--------
----—-—----—----
DATE:
jAMES E. CONNICK
06-OG05
DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET,
RESIDENT.. RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRAL ONE_FmlLY R"'m
(RI) 00 (Rl)CLUSTER
N:. L FRONTAGE 100 FT I SID FT (NONE)
DATE
A. .:H UU LOOTT WIDTH: Do FT ISO CNONE) LYNN SAND &STONE NO. wI!iIDN
MINIMUM LOT AREA 15.000 S.F. 40,000 SF� (NONE) C/O AGGRECATEJIN USTRES
LEN CMRAGE BY BUILDING. 30% As% 30% 06-00 29 DEFINI-1 IVE PLAN
NUUMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 1 45 FT 35 FT
FT "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
I
M NIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 5
M�NJMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT m FT ;. FT SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
R 30 FT 30 FT
MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30
OWNER,
A WBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
18 WALLACE ROAD
LYNN. MA 019W WmLL&'mS
GERI 3605536056.15057
WORKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN awTRUST W SPARAGFIS
FEET
76 CA4VIUUE BY AAA_
DATE- ----- LYNH.MIN 01905
I Ocus.
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SAI,EM. 00 aftff� s ..,UCRM;.MAH.'
a THE N0710E OF APPROVAIL OF THIS PILAN E IE SALEM, MA
HERESY CERTIFY THAT Y M,MD 07M
THE FILINNNING BOARD HAS HEN KICEIVED.0 RECORDED AT THIS MIN, OPEN SPACE REWIRED - ISET08 SX, (20%OF TOTAL) 6%=Ra_BEELffWM
2 OFFICE.0 THAT NO APPM WAS RECOMD) DURING THE�ENTY (MIN.OPEN SPACE UPL&PD REWIRED - 75.054. WHICH 6 50% OF OPEN SPACE REOUIRED) AM, 6 PAREILS 7. 8 &9
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. OPEN$FACE PROVIDED - 303.458 SF� 0' 20' 40' 80' DEFINITIVE SHEET 2 OF 2
(OPEN SPACE UPLAND PRONDED - 211.85111 S.F.) 1!1��
SCALE'1'.40' 0
-—-------aliT_ RK MGUST 14,Z015 SHEET 3 OF I
8
JEANETTE H,TORION CE FEE B. &
L L. nALHO
\I/— 07-OMB ALFRED & JOAN JOSEPH & A0 N
FRANCES LUCIANO 01-0003 LORRAINE
07-0007 LOUISE P SLOSON PAUL, PAULETTE, JOHN
07-0005 &SCOTT LEBLANC
GAGNE TRUST UR ESMA HYSENESHI WILLIAM M. MONROE. JR,
07-000M 07-0076 07-0002
07-0085 ESA.Y ADD-GADIR
RICHARD L. 0 My
03-0137 M�
E.DU
El D OPEN SPACE 1
LOT 2 ARFA-168,.388 S.F. I CENTILY THAT I CONFORMED
v 7 W, (44,100± S.F WETI-,ANDS) WITH THE RULES AND REGULATION$
I\Ip�\ .697 S.F� L'
7.412 S.F. OR THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS 14
PREPARING THIS PLAN�
LOT 4
-------------------
LOT 1 7.492 S.F.
7. 5 S. WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
v ---------
LIM, LOT 5
K'.'T�o 7.421 S.F. 1Y. ---------
REY &
I - I P '�6
JEFF T� ROGATO
ELLEN TNHl
1-0046
"P UMH
ROADWAY r u LOT 6 E.VIT
EASEMENT I',
,I!,l, 9.141 I.E. LOT 14
Cj� OF SALEM
'0
12.� F. PEANNINIS 90ARD
c-
71
q RM.' ---------—-----—---—-
w I lz , LOT 15 LOT 7 A,; 9
11.127 S.F. 12.973 SJF. I
N, /N' 7.296 S.F. In W".
I ----—--------
0IMI
LOT I
DGE.El LOT 8 ft LOT 9 ------—------
H 7.n4
J� .370 S.F. 6.79a S.F. I
\A LOT 16 A hl.7� LOT
10 245 S F. 5.782 -—--—-----------------
Z� 4i
RR WAR 8.233 S.F. "W'
LOT 17 R-27
h
W
7
'K, --------—-------
LOT 18 V,
TRAIN 2014
8516 S.F.
REALTY MUST U.-
-001 9 �Z . -
USZ &
06 T
L�21-IKOWSKI
A,
06
-0017 LOT 19 R
13,627 S.F. SMI-E.
-�r LOT 24
L.11V DATE: ----—-------------
CO.Alss-ON
'A 12,536 S.F. 3,,35 06-001,
LOT 25
VU2 7 904 SY.
%
LOT 26
7,853 S.F.
THIS I,R, 159
LOT 20 sc�%
F..� LOT 23
14.7051 S.F. �% , 1 8.25, S.F. R,N�
A.
It
R�l
LOT 22
7.630 S.F.
SCALF
LOT 21 _O LOCATION
9.404 S.F.
RON A DRILL HOLE TO BE SEE
DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAIN /0 V 2
DATE: ---- P, 21"
1. A/ %
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, 00
k
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PEAK BY D�N '�
THE P C BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVES AND RECORDED AT THIS DWE.G.
LMININC
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEI�O CURING THE TWENTY SURYA&
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE� ISABELLE W, NO. DATE
06-DO15M
DEFINITIVE PLAN
o
CITY CLERK OTHE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
.,M H,--
01
LOT 27 BARBARA DRISCOLL ET A-
147.992 S.F. 18 WALLACE ROAD
-YNN. MA 01901
�C CERTS 3EO55.36056.36057 WIL11AMS
42) OPEN SPACE 2 W--d
RESIDENTIAL RESIOENTAIE APPIJCANT'
0
ZONE: NE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL 01 AREA=135,070 S.F. NSD REALTY-RUST SPARAGB
(R') (1) (RI) CLUSTER 76�Lff STREET
�47,500± S.F. WETLIJ,10S) LYNN. MA 01205
M�N,MLM LOT FRONTAGE: DO Ft 50 FT NO E EmFcT Loct
M ON� I&
N: UM LOT WIDTH iOO FT �SD FT �N ME OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: CLARK AVENUE SALEM MA
TAL PARCEL AREM-750.538 S.F. REFC�EUCE: s
MINIMUM LET ARE& 15.000 SP QLDOO SP (NONE) To WKBNE olm 139'..
L I COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 452 30% MII`, OPEN SPACE REOUIRED - 150.108 SR, (20% OF TOTAL) OR
OT ASMSE5 PWREI-S 7. 8 A 9
MAMMUM HEIGHT or BUILDING: 35 FT 45 Ft m FT (MIN OPEN SPACE UPI-AND REOUIRED - 75,054, WHICH 6 503 OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED)
OPEN SPACE PRONIDED - 303.458 SF. 9 20- 40' 8B DEFINITIVE SHEET I OF 2
MINIMUM FRONT YARD IS "T 30 Ft is FT (OPEN SPACE UPI_AND PROMDED � 211.858± ST,)
MN -
W�MU SIDE YARD: 10 FT 3 FT 10
M: UM RM YARD 30 FT 300 FT m IFT
c SHEET 2 OF I
Mlu� Lo"I O�
SEE,PROFI SKLLI A
WCEPTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
TH THE RULES AND REGLT_ATIONS
A.. OPEN SPACE 1 NE T.IE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IK
P PER PARING THIS PLAN
�;Al PKI �`WRRL -------------------
R� ------- WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
-----------
F 12' ..,,A
6 ------ -max—
RKRI
7�a WIN _7)
A,
(14)
U2
RWI
CIA
RTA�11.
'�w UPI
A
11 WK-1.
RKI
... "I A 11-—
'2'.1.2�
RRL. C.fT OF SALEM
AREA PLANNING BOARD
P-d 14M
TDP..-I..
Mo SEE PRDFI��SHEET 2
WE 0 1
---—--------------—-
IF
-74- P'.,I.,.�D
12-ROF W-131M
-A
CLERKS CERNFICARON ON THE PLAN n25 ---------------------
DATE: ------------—----
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM DO AT
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PI.AN BY
THE PLANN NG BOARD HAS BEEN RECEI�I)AND RGORDIFG AT THIS ILL,
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEk.WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE
0
CITY CLERK In
LL,LL,
---------------
DATE --—-—----------
2-w-
A. I Mg
jg! In
—.2
gs�v -! 2-
wg gpf;
0 DENO ES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SEL
JV
HX
IZ-2
.A
Ckf NO. RI
z
DEFINITI
> WOODLANDS ROAD
SALEM, MASSACHUSEffS
OWNER'
EARBARA DRISCOLL ET &
18 WAJLkCE READ
RA
—V 01901 C
ED
CENTS 36055.3601
A
's WILLIAMS
I APPLICANT
-T
<
--u 50'VC- NSO REN-TY TRUST SPAMGES
LYNN. MAX,01905
76 01 STREET
--I
s PROJECT [OCUS 18.9 10,
4i
CLARK AVENUE SALEM. DA
DATUm-
125.00 0 0+50 1+0. 1+50 2+00 2+50 3.00 3.50 A+00 4F50 SHOO 5.50 �+w 6+5 8+00 X+50 9+Oc S REFERENCE' s NM�PM S'3 EON'
MAP 6 PANELS 7, 8 & 9
PROFILE SHEET I OF 2
WOODLANDS ROAD
1'-40'(HOR)111 4
X 9 7 + T)� E�ET4 ED F1 I�O
t:
19
+
WORTIFY
6 1 THAT I �E CONFORMED
�EO 11" OFH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
T�E REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
A.r
Y'. OPEN SPACE 1 PREPARING THIS PILAW
fi) A
-------- _W I CL TAM �j SP�IAGES L�6
IW�133,33 -------
"17 IF I',,
C) 12' ........... U�
%
ev"I
N
If
Ur U4
(SF`U,X`Q
Six�.K+w
W.1. ;;1 �Rr CiTY OF SALEM
AREA PLANNING BOARD
RIP ...l. SEE PROFILE SHEET 2
OF WYNA.I., ---—------—--—---
e OKERGY, 1.0
N.
K-;�..'.. ----------------------
�_11..3 r INK.
A ---—-----
25
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE BUNN
DATE ------------—--—
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, ED
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE Or APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN, BY
THE PtUAINNG WARD HAS BEEN RECEKD AND RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIN'ED DURING THE TWENTY LGJ G_
0
DAY� NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE, 0
C)0
CITY CLERK --—---
---------—----
11 DATE --—---—---------
R
0
57-7
i_w A
t H.
H.,
.G, DENO�Es A GRANITE STONE N
G&V
ox NTH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SO.
TA
LJ
W� z Yf
Lj DIV
WOODLANDS ROAD
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER'
BARBARA DRISCOLL Er A_
a-
18 WALUACE ROAJD
LYNN. AA 01901
LC CORTS 36055.36056,36057
o WTLLL4,MS
APPLICANT,
_F I .- SPARAGES
-3.54 N D R�T'TRUST
76 OAKMLIZ STREET
o ipo s 5: NN, �01905
PROJECT LOCUS
-7 :n C_ SORIDD
A CLARK�NENUE SALEM, MA
m __WA
WR.DN.)s3'_".
125JOC 0 a ..S. 1+00 1150 2+00 2+50 3+UU .5. 6+00 6+50 7.00 7+50 8+00 8.5. 9. 070 S39-4040
A, 0' 2V 4W go,
PROFILE SHEET 1 OF 2
WOODLANDS ROAD
HLL�1 -.4 !'?&'4-1V�UERT)
0 0 S SHEET 4 OF 10
14. ITS
+ + T
IRN
A
GEME.. &
�L L�FMJ-HQ
07-0003 LORMN
i E ---4- N�-_ _ r
i L ALL �NE TR
7-__ 7�OUEB HIC 07-007V WIN& ISMA H�SENCSNI WI-L"M M MDNROE, JR.
07-0002
07 0086
E�Y. ABODUCADIR
------ 07-0001
Ill U O'DAY -IV -- —
0 -0137 4W RaN. -AC"-
3 —Ol SIR N'
CERl �T I MW CONFORMED
IMCWNJO wH
WITH THE RUl AHD REGULATIONS
OF THE REOISTERS OF DEEDS IN
OPEN SPACE I PREPARING THIS i'll
vntuwims S-PAWES�(T
I-MR, IFF OF MC w
P.
Z —
P.M
p
)JIFIR Cll OF �EM
P�NNING BOARO
y
Ak
4�-
N, TRAM 20 OATE:
NN.;H; I SJQUF.
NZ
I uMSEWATION
COMMISSION
Oil 40/- 1 06-0011
Ik'
Al
W DENOTES A STONE BOUND
R1 WITH A MILL ROLE TO BE SZT�
E—'a�
ZON w
0
t
-N, TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
7:
WTHE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
USETTS
SALEM,MASSACH
Ol
MIRPRA OR'l
19 W�E ROAD
LYNN.MA 01901
Ul CEIRl 3W5%�056.315057 -w
CLERICS CERB�TION ON THE PLAN RESOENT� RERDENT" APPLICAK, WILLIAMS
ZONE: Ol DIDUSIRX ONE-FAMLY SDRM7YTRUST SPARAGES
(RI) IT)CLUSTER I
DATE: 76� STREET
L�- . "0190
1. CLERK OF THE CRY OF S&E.. DO M (H PROJI I Ocus.
.�Nll LOT FTRONTINGE: ;00 ITT 50 FF ME)
HEREG'CERT�THAT THE NOTICE a�Rl OF THIS i SY WU LOT WOTH: DO FT i50 (RONE) T .1.1
CLQRK A�ENUE SALE .,DRU1`M.MWa`M.
THE �Nll BWO�BEEN RECEIVED MD RECORDED AT THIS MINFRUm LOT 15.000&F. 40,000 SJi (NONE) MiENCE, WIMWOl
Ol TMT NO�PEI Wn RECEIVED BURNS THE� LOT C� BY BUILDING: wx 45X ASSESSORS REFUEF s F.070539.
Dx� SIFT AFTER SUN RECIVIll AND RIECORDING OF SMD HCRICE. uAMMIM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 IT —01 20- 4W aw
M N MU FRONT YM 5 FT F TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET I Or 2
M: M 2 IT mr 41"�
N:MUM SEE YME D 30 FT
M CLERK mi li YARD: 30 FT W 30 FT z
AUGUST 1..7""1 SHEET 6 OF 10
N LIST OF WAIVERS REQUEITED CLERKS CEIREFICATION ON THE PLAN
I SECTION 11 A,I,' WHICH RIDOURES A MINIMUM CENUENLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY DATE:
,E (230) FEE FOR CURVED STREETS,AND. IN PEACE THEREOF.ALLOW WE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS
*N SHOW, O� P-MS, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. 00
$� K"`�
'I HE MY CERTIFY TTAT THE NOTICE OF APSRCVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
2.SECTON N AAD WHICH REOURES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FLU IN _HE
E PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN R-CJEVSU AND RECORDED AT THIS
LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF.ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089,03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN OFFICE AND THAT NO APP-AL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE GIRTY
All ON PLANS. DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT.0 RECORDING OF SAO NOTIC-
3.SECTON V RIGW OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REOUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3
CALIPER. 30 YOU ON CENTER.AND, IN PEACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT --—--——-—----------------
Cl CLERK
x NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MEND THIS UST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS.
IJ0`DJS
IQQ
I C[Rn-�MAT I FAVE CONFORMED
A TH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS 14
lk� LOCUS PREPARING THIS PLAN,
>
-WICL71AMS �k SP GFS LLF
UNKC)N �FRSG& �AJLEUE.
07-PPS,, EMYCES 0.. p N
NOTES III-RDR, SIONS " .1
4N HVV 'Coo.
I EXLNN� CNL L lAj,,I 10MMKI UP A SM,A
1. VERTICAL DATUM UNKNOWN (SEE NOTE 2) 07 MNE �E ERNST
07-00?6/ NYSENEX,I WRAP
F.E.JV ESAM Y LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREMATIONS
2 EXIS7TXG TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES ARE AS SHOWN ON THE PREVIOUSLY
Yl-VXI
APPROVED DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION BY THE CITY OF SALE. (MARCH 3, 2008 MY I I
DECISION) ENTITLED TDERNITNS SUBDIVISION PLAN. CHAPEL HILL, SALEM. �.-.00 D'y
MASSACHUSETTS' DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26. GAS GAEC
2007 BY EASTERN LAND SURVEY. MONITORING WELL
3. WULAND RESOURCE AREA,BOUNDARIES WERE DZLLNIEATEO BY WILLIAMS & 2 3 FIRE HYDRANT
SPARAGES 4 OPEN SPACE I WATER DATE
. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND
DETERMINING THE LOCATION. SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. JETITER (..IN)
SF WN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PI-ANS. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION DEC.1, CATCH BASI\
T
NED ENGINEER SMALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF MY JTILITIES FOUND 02-HAMP
INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY `C-E `C,`
RE.ODIA-ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK, 6 LIGHT POILE
5 TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING HAAMENT BE NONE PATCHED 13
iN ..IN ..H.LE
6. AL�WATER PATNIS SHALL BE 8' DMETER CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED 14
DUCTILE IRON IC.LM.I. ) 12 15 7 TOL/ELEC.MANHOLE CD V
7 ALL GRAVTTY SEWER UNES SHALL BE 8- DIAMETER SOP 35 PVt PIPE 16 8 9 10 11 SEWER MANHOLE os
8 WA-EP AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CONG .CONCRETE
SEPARATION OF 10 FEET, �MINNOW VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES 17 S80H � STONE BOUND DIELL HOa
SHALL RE MANTATNED WHERE WATER AND SEWER LINES CROSS. C, :RN,TK�, END 10..
GIN ALL STORM DRAINS SNPAJ- BE HIGH-OONSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HOPE)
LESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANE EC. EANDCAP.1
10. MINIMUM PITCH FOR ALL DRAIN LINES SHALL BE 0,5% N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
�M IRDN ROD
11. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE T.V. SMI SHALL BE .0 24 Nc�
25 OCKMI.OV
INSTALLE UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH WE APPROPRIATE UTILITY 06-.11 ENDS
AGENCY 04AMNG JURISDICTION. 26
12, STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT TWO (2) PER LOT UNLESS 20 EXISTING CONTOUR
OTHERWISE NOTED ON PEAK. SEE REOUESTED WAIVER 2 3 PROPOSED CONTOUR
13� FIRE ALARM BOX INSTALLATION AND LOCATION(S) STALL BE IN 22 EDGE OF PAYE.E.1 C,
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGUIREMEWS OF THE CITY OF SALEM FEE I
DEPARTMENT. -- -our"" VERTCA.GRANITE CURB
44 TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS IWO DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE /* MRO-�ID SELT FENCE
MADE USING RADIUS GRANITE CURBS. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
15 STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION (TO BE SHOWN AT A LATER DATE) SHALL BE SURNA A
IN ACCORDANCE WTH WE CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. NVOR SURFACE ROW DIRECTION
OR, OTHER APPIRNING AUTHORITY,
16, -.HE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT US WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS(SM.) SUBJECT TO INUNDA110N SY THE 1%ANNUMUL
CHANCE FLOOD AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER OPEN SPACE 2 27
25009CO531G; MAP GOOSED JULY 16, 2014,
RECEIVED
AUG 2 12015 Fe Qu,
CIFEY OF �EIJ UF OF PLANNINEI I
GD,WKK OARD
Rl-MXl FE,MNING 8
;QMAPT
-------------------
LYNN SAND& ----T�— RATE
ST.
Cm AGRE. INDEX PLAN
MKISTRJES
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
PLAN SET INDEX SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER'
BARBARA DRISC(E-L ED AL
SHEET 1: INDEX PLAN
15 WALLACE R�
SHEET 2-3: DEFINITIVE PLANS LYNN. MA 01901
LC CEIRTS 36055.36056.36057
SHEET 4-5: DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILES ---—------------ APPI$CANT' WILLIAMS
NSD REALITY TRUST SPARAGES
76 �KVIL-E STREET
SHEET 6-7: TOPOGRAPHIC PLANS
LYNN, MA 01905 U.I.RAWMARNMEET
T —NH
SHEET 8-10: DETAIL SHEETS CLARK AVENUE E ....01"9
F - RHONNOMSM..
3 ASSESSORS ZEEMkNCE s IACOHNDM.�.
6 PARSES 7. 8 & 9
0- 40' 80' 160' INDEX SHEET I OF 1
DATE
�:1"-80' SHEET I OF 10
AUCUST 14.2015
JEANETTI� H. TORION GE RGE IN.
07-0008 ALFRED &JOAN GMOL L FALHO
\z- FRANCES LUCIANO JOSEPH 07-0003 N
07-0007 LOUISE P SLEISCH PALL. PAULETTE.JOHN LORRAINE
07-0005
& SCOTT LEBLANC GAGNE TRUST ILIR & ESMA HYSENESHI
07-0004 07-0076 07-0002 WILD. �_.ONRCE, JR
07 0086
07-OOC1
RICHARD L CLAY
13-0137 UP
\ R'11 OPEN SPACE 1
,\ Y LOT ,0, AREA=168,388 S.F. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
C, —1 S F LOT 3 (44.100± S.F. WETI�JANDS) WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
To Z,
1�I, OF THE REGTSTERS OF DEEDS IN
o
MeA.F',, PREPARING THIS PLAN.
\,Y,
7.1505 S.F.. 'E.I LOT 4
LOT 1 '.1 A 7.492 S.F. -WCLIAMS SPARAGES LLC__
Ilk
"'4, LOT 5 ------
7.421 S.F.
C,
JEFF EY III
LLLN T ROGATO 19,M
I, i24 - I JF
0 045 EASEWUNT H 1. LOT 6 P, .06CIT
ROADWAY
EASEMENT W. 7,203 S.F.
UP LOT 13
I Y 9.147 S.F. LOT 14 CITY OF SALEM
N."', PLANNING BOARD
12,4W&F� FRO,
Rv
IS
-----—---—--------—-
LOT 12 LOT 15
11,127 S.F. LOT 7
—--—------
t
IWI-PA
LOT 8 IT LOT 9 LOT il
GIG' 1 4 A P ------—------—---—---
I LOT 16 6.370 S.F- t 6,798 S.F. LOT 7"4 SF
WO,W. F.F, 10.245&F. 6.782 S.F..
4 IFAIN
�I,ENL
FSE 617P"2
LOT 17 M, A., UN nt Iz.
1� DRAN SLF. F... En,
.IWAI
v
A ------
F-270 --------—---—---—-
LOT 8 z
THAN 2014 ;F"
LOT
REAL R'230FC
OG�YOTRU $� ��/ ,2IA.43
01.71", TADEUSZ & I
JOANNA .7, 4
AFIH� 14
ItARCIROWSKI A, '-CR11
06-0017 A.M'. 'Az
AP LOT 19
SALEM
13,627 S.F. tp l,�
CONSEWATION DATE: ----—-------------
LOT 24 A. CQMMIbNUN
12.06 SP 06-0011
K-
A, LOT 25
7,904 S.F� S
1.4,1
0
LOT 26
7.1153 S.F.
'S' 'W"
LOT 20 P. V LOT 23
14.709 N'. a.251 S.F..
&F
RI
4IF fw�
2 'p,
LOT 2
7 OCATION
SCALED L
qb LOT 21 12 *:
S.I104 LINE
............
0- DENOTES A GRANDE STONE BOUND
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN -A MIN A DRILL KOLE TO BE SET.
I
DATE: .4t, WIN,
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, 00
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPRONAL OF THIS PLAN BY
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECENED AMID RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL,WAS RECENSD DURING THE TWENTY SONYA
DAYS NFXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPF AND RECORDING OF SAO NOTICE, ISABELLE MRY0 NOL RONSON DATE
06-0015
H DEFINITIVE PLAN
CITY CLERK "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
TS
SALEM, MASSACHUSET
9 OMER
LOT 27 BARBARA ORISCOU EF At. At
147,992 S.F. 18 WALLACE ROAD
-YNN MA 01901 Y'Y
CjRTS 36055.36056.36057 WILLIJOI
OPEN SPACE 2
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT,
ZONE, 'NE-FAM'LY INDUSTRIN. 0 E-FAMI AREA=135,070 S.F, NSD REALTY-RUST SPARAGES
(RI) to (RIM)CUMEN 76 DANVILLE STREET
(47,500± S.F. WETILAIND5) LYNN. ALI 01905
(NONE)
MINIMI LOT FRONTJIGE 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS PRQJECT LOCUS'
MJNIMUM LOT MOTH: ISO a ISO" T NI
OTN. PARCEL AREA.750.538 S.- CLARK ANIENUE SAL MG.0 1911)539 a.
MINI UM LOT AIREl, 15.000 S.F. Q.004)SY, (NONE) - 150.108 S.F. j20%OF TOTAL) s M.�mft)s'3I
LOTMCU"E BY WILDING 3= 45% wz MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED ASSESSORS REEIIE,
MAJOULAM HEIGHT OF BUILIOUNG 35 FI 45 FT 35 FT (MIN.OPEN SPACE UPLAND RZOUIRED - 75,054, WHICH IS SOX OF OPEN SPACE REOUIRED) MAP 6 PATROLS 7. 8 9
OPEN SPACE PROODED . 303.458 S.F. IF 20- 4V aw DEFINITIVE SHEET I OF 2
MINIMUM FRONT YARD: is ED 30 F1' 15 ED (OPEN
SPACE UPLAND PRONADED - 2l%.a5B± S.F.)
M:MN!.MUm SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 IFT to FT
N SHEET 2 OF 10
OR Rw YARD: so 30"T m FT
7.296 S.F. �11
LOT I I
LOT a !T OT 9
7.994 X�
6.370 98 SX. A
LOT 16 LOT
10.245 S.F 6.752
KAN 4EAN.G. 4
LOT 17 A A
8.233 SX.
A.,
2 4 A. 1 43 12- l�'IIH
11-lN. V, I,
'I�l i, �.l P� ,61
'69
SAP,l'T LOT
11 8.516 S.F. WOODLANDS
N— lo
N' F�ZA�0 2TO1. o-,le I C�ERFIFY T�T I HAVE CONFCDGEO
R XTADOUSZ & V_ ROAD WFH THE RULES AND REG��IONS
S 0 C ES N
T GIST I
I N� EN F FEES IN
JOANN� HE
S.E. E, IN TH, PLA
LOT 19 L I W OF THE REGISTERS OF DEE
j
I .I PREPARING THIS PLAN.
COISEWA11W
3.627 S.F. :112 l� COMMISSION
LOT 24 06-0011
W'LL'
-A LOT 25 3'. SPARAGES LLC
A`
WILLIAMS
7.904 SK.
A.,
LOT 26
7,853 S.F.
S'
-0 LOT 23
8251 SF
I S. Aj
IF LM,
po"
Kp A-
LOT 22
7.630 SX, OCA"ON _R�l
LOT 21 91. 2 SCAj_ED L
�q
1, 1 9.404 S.F.
..'11flyF
AFAA��
'yF
SURYA & MEmENT CITY OF SALEM
ISABELLE �IRYO
PLANNING BOARD
-------------------
-—-—---—--
\< LOT 27
147.992*S.F. 9 —--—-—--—-—
LP OPEN SPACE 2 --------
AREA=135,070 S.F.
(47,500± S.F. WETLANDS)
—--------—-----------
-------—----—-—
DATE:
JAMES E.CONN4K
06-0005
OR ODES A GRANDE STORE OOUND
WTH A DRILL ROLE TO BE SET
RESDiNDN- RESIDENTIAL it
ZODE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY `RP25 �1603� A,,A,
(RI) W (RI) CLUSTER
Nimu. LOT FRONTAGE 100 FT 150 FT (NONE)
M:NIMUM LOT MOTH: 100 FT 153 FT (NONE) LYNN SAND STORE NO. REVINION
MINIMUM LOT ARM 15,000 SF. 40.000 S.F, (NONE) C/O AGGREGKTE,INOUSTRiES
LET C,lOOACE EY BUILDING 3ox A5x 30% 06-00 2 DEFINITIVE PLAN
4
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 5 ET 35 FT "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
I
MINIMUM ROW YARD 15 FT 30 FT 15 IT
M FT 30 FT 10 FT SALEM, MASSACHUSE17S
.:�IMUM SOE YARD 10
MUM FEAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 30 FT
OWNFRi
BARBARA CRISCOU�ET A_
I a KMULACE ROAD
LYNN. NAA 0,90,
CERTS 36055.:56056.36057
WIUJAMS
z APPLICANT,
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE RUIN ISO REA_1 TRUST SPARAGES
76 CKWLLE STREET
DATE: LYNN. 01905
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO L I Ocus DiE 10
CRTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APFROMAL OF THIS PLAN BY %0TT ZPMCffa�M��.�750.M SK CLARK A' IN.
..C170SIIHN.
TIE FNjQNMNG ROARD�BEEN RECEIVED.0 RECORDED AT THIS MIN.opER SPACE REQUIRED - ISO.108 S.F. (20% OF TOTAL) NEOCIM. MAR 6 PARELS 7. a & 9 s ME�*.$3".0'.
(MIN,OPEN SPACE UIMLAND REOUIRED . 75.054. WICH IS 50%OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED)
OFFICE AND THAT No APPEAL WAS RECEIVED WRING THE TKENTY
DAYS NEIT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. OFfi SPACE ER,,DED � 303.AS8 SY. _IA,. W 49 sw DEFINITIVE SHEET 2 OF 2
2 (OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROVIDED . 211.858* SY�) I,,!
D! SHEET 3 OF 10
"U�UST14.515 _j
zJi
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON -HE PLAN SEE PROFILE SHED 1
,C CASE 7159 DATE ----------------
@ CLERK OF TETE CITY OF SALEM 00
-IN �' "Hill' '�. 'HE NOTICE OF A�PRC�AL OF THIS FEAR By
7H PLANNAG BOARD HAS BEEN RECENTI)AND RECORDED AT THIS
II VUt ANO IHAI NO AF�EAL WAS RECEKD DURING THE TMCOEY
G DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECCIT XNG
NIC.IDNG OF SAO NOTICE
---—--CITY CLERK---_
OU
toll.,
CONFORMED
CERTIFY FLAT I HAW
RNM-imm 0 THE,RE ISTERS 0'DEEDS 14
NEEH THE RULES AND REGUILATIONS
PFREPAR VG GTHIS PIUAN,
Ir.l.-Ulm
OPEN
-------------------
410 , 4
SP I SPACE WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
0 1 11- 1
0 a XY, a\
'4�0 Z"141 21
74 \3
X,
"'
WTO
RRRBAY
BETENTKN NIND3 11
PWIM I;m
I
TF`�.
SYRUMY WOPON�GERNI
rL O'BI RRUMMY U. CITTY OF SALEM
PI_ANNING BOARD
-----------
20 'ADIRCIP
UNDO
P;ON=D IRS
z 4' —----------
"'M' BIT, SIDENVALK
GRAYFL�
LOA. SEED
0
�11401_
IF ----------
3/8"CIA HOLE I
/2'
DEEP AT ACTUAL
rEXJSTING GRADE p
ROINT OF Su�
TERRENCE
6'OF EXISTING -------
1C LANIH, SOIL
N\ ..-.7 & REPLACE W/3*MINUS
TRAIL DETAIL ---------------
CRUSHED STONE
A (NOT TO SCALE) DATE: ------------
+
Pp OSEO U
pi
FINISHED GRNDE_'
GRANITE BOUND
DETAIL
(HOT TO SCALE) DENOTES A GRANITE STORE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SO,
COMMON FILE MATERIAL 6'OVERLAP
I SIDEWALK VARIABLE 4
VARIABLE
GEOPEXTILE FABRIC 7E%' MAX
a I NKE MAYRON
(EYE) Y,
GO �L LARDING' DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
0
IN .v G SS PLOT 1.5%' CROSS SLOPE
ON 3�/8'TO 3 4 SOUTH RIDGE CIRCLE
50'VC -1.00% 50 VIC TOWARD STREET FOR
ED PR ED RAMP .1 1: DRAINAGE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
GRADE AT END OF CURB OWNER'
GRASS PLOT BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
18 WALLACE ROAD
DATUM=L35.00 4�PERT+ CORR. HOPE 3" LYNN. MA 01931
0+0
6 M, 0+50 1.00 1+50 2,00 2.50 (HOLES FACING UP) �CNVAPTE CURB EDGE 0 ...A, LC GENTS 36055.36056,36057
r M, 6"R�&AT EN L 6'RIEVEAE WHIJAMS
SOUTH UI OR NSO REALTY TRUST
PEA SPARAGES
�UNDISPJRSED EARTH 'Cl 76 CAKALLE STREET
6 6 H I N CEMENT SEE RAMP C,
RIDGE -0 INL ONCE LEOEL _ANDING"WITH LYNN, MA 01905
I + REFER L
FOUNDATION UI9ROUH-N—
+ MADE 101
+ CIRCLE K UNDERDRAIN CLARK A�ENUE Va., MA s IORI'L"ON..I..
ASSESSORS REFERENCE- ..E 018)sl�.
DETAIL WHEELCHAIR RAMP MAP 6 PARELS 7. 8 & 9 WAR 010 539'R.
PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 2
A (NOT TO SCAI_E� DETAIL 0' 29 40'
(NOT TO SCALE) NOTES 211� �s
DBER') S T 0 lo�
CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE ±O 5% 1 S�'1--49(HITR)674�
HEE�MF
\��TRAN 2014
�NUI
')�DEUSZ &
06-0019 T I nl �
U\ CERTIFY THAT I RUNS CONFORMED
D WT.THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
EXIST.WH
FIM.I�.UI Wl, 0 THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
W-$9,3 S PF
CONMREMPON REPAIRING�HIS PIUAN
COMMISSION
-WI JL AM S-�k SPAF�.FS LZ
A, 1�z
�;zj �% cz �4
% N.
AI
-z�
gjQN
CC) 1-09! CITY OF SALEM
'C� P�NNING BOARD
AXA-UUXXRXC,DNNl
Kk-1
----------------------
DAMS C.DI
Of—�SPNE 2 --—-------
06-001t -z-
A.
Al�
0� —--—-----—-----—--
A W.1 � c 'A",. I"
-A I-
WRNSUR 0,MIDAIR,OXNN& D�TET
I w MINE off w UNIX a ILVIL
\L WT AIV//-/
GAA-
M.
A A
IJA�ES COI
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE Pi-,NN 0- DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A ORIU- HI TO BE SET
BRED: --—--------------
1. CLERK OF THE DIET OF WEM. DO
HEREBY CULLFT THAT THE NOTICE Or APPROI OF THIS PLAN BY
THE 2
GFILANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECENIED AND RECORDED AT THIS
OFF E AND THAT NO AP EAL WAS RECE�D DURING THE TWENT( 0
DAn NEXT AFTER SUCH PRECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOI
W`AX
-4/Q IN Z5. .0. RAXTSION BATE
CM CLERK 6-
TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
x\ 01
I`AN BASISARA DRISCOLL 7 ALE
is WALI-ACE ROAD
L".. ARA 0190,
LC CEOs 36 55,36056,36057
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL 0 E-FAMI WMLLAMS
Ly a W-4
0) RI CLUS7,ER APPLICANT & SPARAGES
Wr V NS REALTY TRUS`
7 0
M:N
N:M M LOT FRONTAGE: DO FT �50 FT �NOI 01 STREET
M MUUM LOT WIDTH: ;w FIT i5o IT NONE K,A,, LYNN. MA 01905
MINIMUM LOT AREA, 15.000 SY. 40.000 ST. (NOKE) PROIJECT LOCUS SiRITION
LOT CONTRAGE W BUILDING: 30% ASIA Sax Ar I— CLARK AMENDS �.. NA S MIECALITH1,1IMI
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 F, 45 FT 35 IT ASSESSORS REEERENCE- MHOMEN71013ITARDI
MINIMUM FRONT YANG: 15 'T zTo FT is IT MAP 6 PAI 7.6 & 9 ailm`3940.
M N MOM SIDE YARD: 10 FT SO IT 10 FF 0' 20' 40, w TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 2 OF 2
.,N�MO. NEAR YARD: 30 FT So IT w IT
SCALE
AUGUST 14.2015 SHEET 7 OF 16
STANDARD WDRAND TO MEET CITY Of
[--lA A NOTE SALEM REQUIREMENTS
CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK TO BE USED ONLY WHERE IT
VERTCAL GRANITE CURB. TYPE VEI WILL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED CAVITE. PUMPER CON SCION- BRZMKAWAY
8,R.CPK,S�,ftl AlL OF MANHOLE FINISH GRADE, MATERIAL IARTES USE RESTIZAKED jo INR FITTINGS (MEGALNG OR FACES ROAD
EY BINDER COURSE APPNO�ROD WHAT) "ERE CONCRETE TFRUST BLOCK 15
U NACCCF7ABLE� 0
T_ RMAL OPERATING PRESSURE, .1
+R TOP COURSE SliE OF BLOCK OR FGlUG TO BE DESIGNED FOR IS SOEWAL�
'CK I FEE WALL
LOPE 1�/-
B FLOW B TIMES .0
NAMES EDGESTONE
BASE COURSE 6' 1-6"
FOR PAOEMI MAKEUP, CRUSHED STONE MIN "04Mw
AN-DEN STANDARD
PIPE SEE PAVEMENT NOTES VAUl BOX AND C�R
&RA-L BAN
a UIN
ltor ACCESS TUBE E CONFORMED
BRICKS ON 'A""A"r I'L POLY (WER STORE CERTIFY THAT I RA'
EDGE (2XS EXPOSED) WTH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
ED MASONRY RING Or THE REGISTERS OF BEEBE IN
BRICK CHARNEL APPLIES VERTICAL GRANITE CURB CONCRETE PREPARING THIS PLAN.
TO I,
(NOT TO SCALE)
TO DROP CONNECTIONS AS THRUST BE
A ARDUE AS CCNATNTXONA_� DETAIL CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS
USED, 00 NOT BLOCK GRAIN
PLAN SLOPED GRANITE CURB
71
RE�CAL
Sp 3
tc�,nFGSLDRE
LAYER TOP COURSE WATER RAN IRCNIII � CUBIC YARD OF
SHELF ELEVATOR SAME AS LATER BINDER COUI ANC�OI TEE SELECTED 2�STONE - TO 5"
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE. - SQUARE BY 6-INCH THICK AEGAE HYDRANT OMN
SLOPE I'/FT. DENSE GRADED CRUSHED MECHANICAL jol T PROARDE 12'
WALL OF MANHOLE STONE CONCRETE WE UNDER HYDRANT
POURED CONCRETE WE CITY OF SJALFM
PICAL FIRE HYDRANT
COMPACTED TY PI_,ANNING BOARD
BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL SUIEKDRADE CONNECTION FOR HIGH
OR LOW SERVICE LINE
IF MINIMUM SLOPED GRANITE CURB DETAIL --------------------
DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE)
12'MINIMUM SCREENED (NOT TO SCALE) ----------------------
CMi/E_WE
BRICK ON EDGE UNDISTURBED EARTH
SECTION A- ------------------
CONCRETE COLILAR ---—--------
6- HIGH CHECK DAM WHERE SHOWN OR IIJAN BITUMINOUS CONIC. TO' SAWCUT EXISTING PAYEMENIF
MAH O'E FRAM AN COURSE AS SPECIFIED APPLY TACK COAT ---------------
H AS BIT CONC. BINDER
CORER SPECIFIED E WING GROUND SURFACE OR -------
FINISHED GRADE 12' COURSE AS SPEC,
CIE
GRAVEL WE AS SPE I�EG—, EXISTING PXvEMENT —------------------
I I'll 1-2"CRUSHED COMPACTED SUI �
BRICK FOR GRACE ST HE EXISTING BASE
ADJUSTMENT
�PRECAST TRANSITION SECTION
OR BARREL SECTION WITH
PRECAST TOP STAR DATE: —-----
V,,ICS (SEE PI_AN)
_0 I MIN
RUBBER W-RING GASKET I
OR PREFORMED FLEXIBLE
4 0' UNLESS OTHERWISE- =0 /—JOINT SEALANT As SPECIFIED GRASSED SWALE
INDI 0. DRAWINGS UNC7-0 SC., E) FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED PAVEMENT MATCH
DETAIL CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON IN' RIUMAN
MANHOLE RUNGS _IALLITRUCEI OF 1'.2'.3.4,5. (NOT TO SCALE)
OR 6 LENGTHS AS REQUIRED DATE —---------
8' MINIMUM CILERK OF FrE CITY OF SALE.. 00
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIRE NOYCE OF APPIRDNAL OF THIS PLAN 31
SEE PIPE CONNECTION THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RIIE.AND RECORDED AT THIS
SHELF ELEVAPON SAME AS DETAILS THIS SHEET OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL.. RICEINSID DURING THE �EJHY
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE V DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
IL /-8- MINIMUM
CITY
m NII BOUND
NA, mauE Elm STAKE TDINARD pEIISEQ DIN TRfE GOilliOUR WOOD POST
12' MINIMUM PREBIQUISLY LVD B`iIJE
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM SLAB SCREENED GRANEL
SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2-FlEll" SliSEL.PICKM
THE MANHOLE RANGE
L BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL, FILTER FABRIC AS SPEORE
SECT ON WALL OR TOP STAB
WHICNERIER S GREATER. DATE
SECTION 3- NO. RiDiS.
UNDISTURBED EARTH
dc DETAIL SHEET
PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE ANCHOR FASRIC WITH
SOIL.TARP EACKFILL 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
DETAIL
mw QF:`DE
(NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING GRWN+D SALEM, MASSACHUSET-Ts
SUR'FACE DIRECTION OF FLOW
P..Nw
GO
OWNER
BARBARA DR SCOLL EY A-
'ROAD A
CARRY F&BRIC DO" 6.: is wAELACE
INTO TRENI LYNN, MA 01901
LC GOODS 36055�6055.36057 M
WERE. 7S
NED RMW FIX "WIS
APPLICANT: 7_4
--WOOD POSTS TV W�p
a_O'OG. MAX — —,=
DARMILLE STREET
z 1-2'CRUSHED LYNPU No,GIBBS STABE,
z PROJECT
01-S STONE locus
6' MIN. TEMPORARY HAY, SALES CIPARK AANUE A.
XI 0.)13�..
FLOW, SILTIFENCE S
DETAIL WAR 6 PAFSELS 7. a& 9
71 DETAIL DETAIL SHEET 1 OF 3
NOT TO SCALE (NOT TO SCALE) SCAM NOT TO SCAILE
STONE CHECK DAM
10 SHEET 8 OF 10
(NOT TO SCALE) ALI 14.�UIP
LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
1.SECTION IV A.1.f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY DATE: -------
(230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS
Ay
0 SHOWN ON PLANS. CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO
z< HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
fto
co
0
,p `
c 2.SECTION IV A-4-c WHICH REQUIRES CUL—DE—SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS
LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED IbURING THE TWENTY
ON PLANS. DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECQRDING OF SAID NOTICE.
LOCU
3.SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3
CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) ------- -------------- —
TREES PER LOT AND GENERALLY AS SHOWN ON PLAN. CITY CLERK
NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS.
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
VICINITY MAP OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
1 "=800'± PREPARING IHIS PLAN.
JEANETTE H. -----------
ALFRED & JOAN WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
TORION JOSEPH & N
07-0008 FRANCES LUCIANO / LOUISE P. PAUL, PAULETTE,
NOTES: - 07-00,07 SLEISON JOHN & GEORGE M. &/ LORRAINE M.
07-0005 LEBLA C TT GAIL L. FIALHO ILIR & IESMA
07-0003 GAGNE TRUST HYSENESHI WILLIAM M.
07-0 0 07-0076
1 . VERTICAL DATUM UNKNOWN (SEE NOTE 2)
07-0002 MONROE, JR. ESAM Y.
07-0086 ABDELGADIR
2. EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES ARE AS SHOWN ON THE 07-0001 V)
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION BY THE CITY OF SALEM (MARCH 3, 2008 RICHARD L. O'DAY
DECISION) ENTITLED "DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHAPEL HILL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS" 03-0137 LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY EASTERN LAND SURVEY.
3. WETLAND RESOURCE 'AREA BOUNDAfRIES WERE DELINEATED BY WILLIAMS & SPARAGES. 2 MONITORING WELL
3 FIRE HYDRANT
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE >. /
LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON 4 OPEN SPACE 1 WATERGATE
THESE PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN
WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND JEFFREY M.
APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. & ELLEN T. 5 CATCH BASIN (DRAIN)
ROGATO 4,00
02-0046 UTILITY POLE cTh
5. TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT BE HEAT PATCHED. k�_3
6. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE 8" DIAMETER CLASS '52 CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON ;r-_ LIGHT POLE
(C.L.D.I. ) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DRAIN MANHOLE
14 @
7. ALL GRAVITY SEWER LINES SHALL BE 8" DIAMETER SDR 35 PVC PIPE. 12 7 SEWER MANHOLE
CLARK-�V—Ewji 15
8. WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION (TO BE 8 CONC = CONCRETE
OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED 16 9 10 ill
WHERE WATER AND SEWER LINES CROSS. SBDH = STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE
9. ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE HIGH—DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) UNLESS 17 A FND FOUND
OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. TRAN 2014 -4 Or
REALTY TRUST )VCR WHEEL CHAIR RAMP
06-0019
10. MINIMUM PITCH FOR ALL DRAIN LINES SHALL BE 0.5% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON 18 N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
THE PLAN. Z_
i4C' WIDE &"Eo) IROD IRON ROD
otl L-C
11. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE T.V. SERVICES SHALL BE INSTAkLLED TADEUS,
�F_�FS 3 AND 5)
& JOANNA SALEM
UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY AGENCY HAVING 119 CONSERVATION TREE
BARCIKOWSKII COMMISSION
JURISDICTION. 06-0017 SOU 24 25 -0011
TH B 06 EXISTING CONTOUR
0 RIDGE
12. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT TWO (2) PER LOT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON Z_ 26
PLAN, SEE REQUESTED WAIVER. CIRCLE PROPOSED CONTOUR
20
13. FIRE ALARM BOX INSTALLATION AND LOCATION(S) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 23 EDGE OF PAVEMENT _EP- - - - - -
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT. VGC
22 VERTICAL GRANITE CURB
14. TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS INTO DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE MADE USING 21 SCALED LOCATION
_-------=-ZO Ni�_04IE
RADIUS GRANITE CURBS. PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES
15. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION (TO BE SHOWN AT A LATER DATE) SHALL BE IN PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, OR, OTHER
APPROVING AUTHORITY. SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
SURYA &
16. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS ISABELLE WIRYO
(SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD AS SHOWN ON 06-0015
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 25009CO531G; MAP REVISED JULY 16, 2014.
17. PROPOSED FOUNDATION UNDERDRAINS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE TOWARDS THE STREET.
OPEN SPACE 2 27
rob
t,,M p
It 0k6
7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
CITY OF SALEM JAMES E. 6 Land Court 6/11/2016
CONINICK 5 Legend of Symbols &Abbreviations 1/29/2016
PIAUOM BOARD 06-:0005
4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016
3 No changes to this sheet 12/07/2015
02 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015
I Lot line 18/19; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015
LYNN SAND & NO. REVISION DATE
STONE
C/O AGGREGATE INDEX PLAN
INDUSTRIES
06-0012
"THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER:
BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
18 WALLACE ROAD
LYNN, MA 01901
LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
APPLICANT: WILLIAMS
PLAN SET - INDEX
'NSD REALTY TRUST
------------------------ 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPARAGES
SHEET 1 : INDEX PLAN LYNN, MA 01905 LNGINEM I M"NMS I SURMORS
I 1119 NORTH MAIN STREET
PROJECT LOCUS: SUITE 101
PLAN REFERENCES: MIDDLETON,MA 0 1949
SHEET 2 - 3 : DEFINITIVE PLANS ------------------------ CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE:(978)539-8088
FAX:(978)539-8200
1) LAND COURT PLAN 71159—B ASSESSORS REFERENCE:
WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM
SHEET 4 5: DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILES, 2) LAND COURT PLAN 7159—X MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 S
SHEET 6 - 7: TOPOGRAPHIC PLANS 3) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-2 0' 40' 80' 160'
4) AN UNRECORDED PLAIN ENTITLED "DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHAPEL HILL, SALEM, INDEX SHEET I OF I
DATE: TS" DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY
-------- — MASSACHUSET
SHEET 8 11 : DETAIL SHEETS EASTERN LAND SURVEY ('SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY SALEM PLANNING BOARD). SCALE: 1"=80'
AUGUST 14, 2015 SHEET 1 OF 11
JEANETTE H. TORION GEORGE M. &
SBDH (FD)
3/4/2016 07-0008 ALFRED & JOAN JOSE P H &_ GAIL L. FIALHO
FRANCES LUCIANO LOUISE P. SLEISON PAUL, PAULETTE, JOHN 07-0003 LORRAINE M.
07-0007 07-0005 & SCOTT LEBLANC GAGNE TRUST ILIR & ESMA HYSENESHI
07-0004 07-0076 07-0002 WILLIAM M. MONROE, JR.
07-0086
ESAM Y. ABDELGADIR
07-0001
S85*2 9.1
RICHARD L. O'DAY I"E 951-48
03-0137
114-09 S76'07, DH (s)
-24'51 IIE 7"t
PROPOSED 103.7B I OZ62 7/25/2ol6
DRAIN
EASEMENT
JO.:51 S66-ls'> OPEN SPACE 1
0� AREA=168,292 S.F.
A\
LOT 2
<0 I? 11p, I�_ 00< LOT 3 8,9.ls (44,1 00± S.F. WETLANDS)
\b 7,697 S.F. 0 ft: ��u
7,412 IS
<< F.
N11 z
49.42 u %
T
�j lk to
N86'40'01
.16,23' co
0, ro 60-11, 4
'N 5.r,6
144; 0 07'48" LOT 4
L=�6,3 7,3
�5.00
765.0( 0
?,-1' 65.65 S66' 7,492 S.F.
LOT 1
f \\\, 0 ss,3" 91� c�
7,805 'S.F. 0 *< 05 f\ SO
Q)
C14
(0 cv
00 -34
4�401
S6
N.
101 T '34" 'S66- 6, _S81:17"351
N86*40'01 IA740 7,5, IS e LOT 5 -
t� 25.00 279.74- 00
15,31. 7,421 S.F.
50,24 92 1� I
CITY OF SALEM a 7 wo 100 5r - N
31.71 IA/
P N BOARD 0,0e, txl 00 ACV Zv
72e. 0 NQ
N86*40'01"E
JEFFREY M. & Ap IV
7S
0 '\l 013 0 '39 4o S66'
ELLEN T. ROGATO 66-7,5. _q
PROPOSED
'b
02-0046 UTILITY
EASEMENT 10O.U0 PROPOSED 4!
,. (�
ne),o /10,10 LOT 6 DRAIN
V * Lo 9..
X� .10 1.,
'Z ROADWA' ' EASEMENT
LOT 13 7,203 S.F.
EASEMENT /0-, S6
o ss'
N
'00 8,521 S.F.
70 z LOT 14
0 6'
01; 0
11 2 03 S.F. 4__��Sd�09 0 _/0. 70,3
0 16,
k�6
0
N /I
v
/0 Q
5F
-)07 .,(g x �-o ,\ r -7
Y, 6. . 0 /0,-0, 5r,
qb - 1; .00 76,
7j..90 0 S85*38'41"E .-59'42
1 191.54
�_*------- :ZZ90-00, LOT 12 LOT 15 -7,)-"9,
63 7,368 S LOT 7 97.53 0
001, F. A' 15-46 DH (FD)
0�1 S85*38 Oi
3o.00 12,424 S.F. '41"E 78.55 0
kp v,* 7,2 9 6 S.F. S85*38'41"E
42'. ,1, (0 3/17/2016
12 14�7 S85*38'41"E 0i
('V
4u
Q)� PROP
ro Ov lov 0
Ioc N 0,
IQ, r� p- P7 Q 4,
0. Esm� �0 ;0 00
10, ` >_ -0" LOT 9 '64 J
00, 0 LOT 8 0 LOT 11 0)
----- ------------------- 00 g 1.4 4T,A�'o C) �_?90 9 C'O) w
dQ 7��jo
104.1313 C) 40 -b .00 J 6,370 S.F. 6,798 S.F. /K 7,9 9 4 S.F. 00 -la�L_�l
9, t a ,
NB3738 00 Q) U) 0 V)
1-1 1(0 CO* IPROPOSED -4Q LOT 16 LOT 10 0
Cj 41) 10 rn _j co
DRAIN 6,782 S.F.
7B 24 10,245 S.F. L
-0, 3-38'00'E 4v r\*Q 00
N8 '37 EASEMENT 1:
S6 10 c�'-T c\j
---- ------- -----------
:�).39 39-68 C4� �%o f" -0�
CO �22* K
OT Icfoo. 0 R�23o.73'17" 6 15*58'02 z rl\ _0
3
0
44.94 &� q�ZIi 30'15"
rr( N 37 S. 4 43 To -2,3 L�89 00 L=75-24 :__(0 V.
.20 N C? �'6`80,'0 SALEM
P 0(0
------------------------ 0 4)) to
91 4 :::z 1. .6
-4.01 1, 2 4 QOO 4 1
8,00 (z, CBD (FD) `6, Sip 49.4 R=27 .00 L=79-85
0
N8373 I - I PROPOSED LOT 17
DISTURBED )8 .0 7 DRAIN 7 4 Zz -32' R=50 Z ro 7"'0.
R .55 R CONSERVATION
CO 09 0 7� 4
3/4/2016 S61. 8,233 S.F. "J U 4 1979 0.00 23000 95.91
R 19. , --4.85.
'(FD) 0� �= 7 Z�_ R
5,0 1--2,> 49, R 2,-56'15 0.00
SEE DETAIL 0,5' .00 COMMISSION
CBDVA EASEMENT
'__1 1�. 1 30
10- - 0 5'25'16 �0 '54'22"
'BED -�23 - 0 PARCEL A 30 2(0 'a 109
------------ ----------- 3/,1/2016 79 cb 4. 06-0011
47,925 S.F.
35.,38 iB
DETAIL: 0 18�25'25'1 6', /?-- b.
_p NOT TO SCALE S8 R�23().00 - . 30.0 Vf- .00 -
5-13'09" L�:: 0.00 4- n I
"10 484;" td DH (FD)
Iq 1 flAt 0_/_ 17.,;1 S84'21'59"E _xl 0 4 82 L'==102.05 136 1 9,60
.4
DATE: ---- ----- 56 0 S84*2 1'59 -82 Qp )180
-,>-- TRAN 2014 "E R=270.00 45T
0 p \, 4- N85129 7/25/2016
74.21 ��b5I L=55.23 _��:230.*Oo -1 pj�,,
\\ 7,r �11 0)
kp S84*21'59"E -'\q -A=11'43'1 '107;�,.0 �25'211 &`z2;70 24 .4 E
130.61 39" NB5'09'45
iJ". ;p-- 6, t-- -"-,I
4� L Nk- 11 IX v: S4
06-0019 1,644 S.F. 2 0.23
REALTY TRUST n/y LOT 18 END OF WALL
DOO 0
6
0. -5 - 3
0 TADEUSZ 4'9*20,37 48"
z
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
_Q� UZI=A 30.33, q CLARK AVENUE 4__0 60
& JOANNA LOT 19 Ln t,3 .12- -
R'50-00 0) _1 0, WIDE - VJNIMPROVED),,3 f?lzr"
4 "30
BARCIKOWSKI 0) 6 -/�v 9,940 S.F. '00 (4 PLAN 71598
DATE: ------------------ cv-) 1\ ro - AS SHOWN ON LC 0-0-90 _12635 5
.0 06-0017 ve;� 'a,/�0 1�1 5) 6 (0
0 (SHEETS 3 AND (0 481 R==50-00 DH (FD)
CIV
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO (To BE ABANDONED) cb t" R__ L== 12- 3/17/2016
9; 50.00 IN LEDGE P,
LOT 24
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY A N 7 / L-74 99
'I"' ., -\ tK 12,636 S.F. LO zz:85. c\j
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS '53"E S 5�
S84*21 LOT 25 coiN
4 9976
0 00
7,9 0 4 S.F. -60
25.23 OUTH n I boi� M '37 11 c")I
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY �G 11- ��3 z 0
74.53 N(3 6p DH (FD)
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. L--39 .00 IZ3
�i Q 470-
5.4 .00 7/2 /2016
0 RIDGE PARCEL B tx LOT 26 Clq END OF WALL
J3. tx 70, 0
0 4-
16,144 S.F. 7,853 S.F. LIJ
---------------------- ------ 0-E
0/ 6' S82'49
CITY CLERK IRCLE Ito
�5 ;0 0
-A 01 81-05
p�=A45-00 zo
LOT 20 LOT 23
65 2 0
14,709 S.F. 461 0 4 8,251 S.F.
0)
Q) 0).41) 0)/ (IV �10 LU
(0 fl) OC I N
90 P-)n
_cv R=145,00 LOT 27 SEAL
ZO `�'/// I\ c0*/ R=50 DO 0 F
OV (-v 8 ry # L=10.69 OF
0- AD L=55-35
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 5' 3" Z� =4'1 3'21
ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY =63' LOT 22 '1011-
0 �1\ N JOHN J.
;:0 C, R
(Rl) (Rl) CLUSTER qII 7,630 S.F. ON
(1) > 0 LOCAT'
Q) LOT 21 0. ILD SCALED
PSI Pol 49904 1
f c�
1 37 ZONE
150 FT (NONE) �30 9,404 S.F. r- Ln '�ELINE LU 40
100 FT
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:
S61 9 . Ai
MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F.. (NONE) -0 4,j 07.14 S DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
7 Q / - N83'46'53
,37
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) lod
'0-
LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% 4S.71 WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
35 FT 45 FT 35 FT 1.0
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: �p �5, Q Q� N8 �;F 119.97 7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
A> .,9,3 30, Q 3 20 .37
'227-11
MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT N83746'53"F- 6 Land Court 6/l/2016
21.74
5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016
MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 10 FT
MINIMU.M REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 30 FT Al 4 No changes to this sheet ...- 1/22/2016
D/Y Ul 4! 3 No changes to this sheet 12/07/2015
(0 PROPOSED
DRAIN 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015
EASEMENT OPEN SPACE 2 1 Lot line 18/1.9; Notes 9/4/2015
SURYA & NO. REVISION DATE
ISABELLE WIRYO
OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: 06-0015 DEFINITIVE PLAN
TOTAL PARCEL AREA=749,531 S.F.
MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 149,906 S.F. (20% OF TOTAL) "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION
(MIN. OPEN SPACE UPLAND REQUIRED = 74,953, WHICH IS 50% OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED) N
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 302,977 S.F. SUBDIVISION SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
(OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROVIDED 211 ,300± S.F.)
LO OWNER:
P LAN 0 F LAN D
i fr" BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS DRAWN FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
Uj 18 WALLACE ROAD
ON THE GROUND IN ACCORDANICE WITH THE LAND COURT INSTRUCTIONS GO �YIINN, MA 01901
<
LIST OF WAIVER� REQUESTED OF 2006 BETWEEN MARCH 4, 2016 AND AUGUST 23, 2016. IN LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
APPLICANT: WILLIAMS
l .SECTION IV A.l .f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF PLAN IREFERENCES: EDM ACCURACY ±(3 MM + 2 IPPM) = (0.0098 FT + 2 -PPM) NSD REALTY TRUST
TWO HUNDRED THIRTY (230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN SPARAGES
PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON PLANS. TRAVERSE PRECISION (RAW) = 1:21 ,686 SALE ,M MA'S SAC H U S ETTS 76 OAKVILLE STREET ENGINEERS I "NNERS I SURM
1) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-B LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE (RAW) 0.1� FEET LYNN, MA 01905 119 NORTH MAIN STREET
2) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-X SUITE 101
2.SECTION IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO DIRECTIONAL ERROR OF CLOSURE N41*W 0' 20' 40' 80' 120' PROJECT LOCUS:
3) LAND GOURT PLAN 7159-2 f MIDDLETON,MA 01949
EXCEED 500 FEET IN LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A. S CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE:(978)539-8088
4) AN UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED "DEFINITIVE CALE: 1 "=40' DATE: MARCH 17, 2016 FAX:(978)539-8200
LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ASSESSORS REFERENCE: WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM
SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHAPEL HILL, SALEM,
S
DATE: MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9
3.SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES MASSACHUSETTS" DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED ------------------------------I----------- BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 144 TO 153 AND CLARK AVENUE ON
THROUGH 'OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY EASTERN LAND 0' 20' 40' 80'
STREET TREES TO BE 3- �" CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LC PLAN 7159B & LOT 375 ON LC PLAN, 7159-2 1 1 1 DEFINITIVE SHEET I OF 2
PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT. -1
SALEM PLANNING BOARD).
SCALE: 1"=40'
NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURINlG t,
SHEET 2 OF I I
0 THE PERMIT PROCESS. AUGUST 14, 2015
Uj
I L
Rz-,3 .00 'z LOT,-
6=4
LOT" 12,
12
o� e T 14 8? (0 OPEN DH (FD)
<C� 4/A LO 'IV
s) LOT 7 �0 3/17/2016
'PROP. (C)
6_� \ --'-
10 SPACE
I DPW 0-1 4 1\
_SM'T 4.0- LOT 15 LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED
FSM'T. <,\ 1345 S6 �19-- 4 1\ 410 1
00, On v 77 CO \\0�0�O�Q �-1 , 1�\ 4
;P 91.43 4 !�P-s IV
07,c) 911 - LOT 9
LQ 100-F 104-88 >
N83*313 9,61 2 It, ;: -N - '00', 00 27 Uj 1 .SECTION IV A.1 .f WHICH REQUIRES A
J9_ 1 (0 1
LOT 8 >_;� N
PROPOSED LO 0)
0 7824 bo
lk 100 MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO
0 Q
L01 DRAIN (IV LOT 11
(IV 0 C6
0 LOT 10 cr
N83- 37 ASEMENT 0) :U 11� , (0 HUNDRED THIRTY (230) FEET FOR CURVED
9.39 39.6B S6 a LOT LL w co
`24� �1�vo '\ "? 16
44.94 Do 1- 6 �� �� 47vq (0 -)� - "?; �*2! In =22-13,171, C�g STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW
I lqt4,op co, 00.
r,v N83*38 'is ViZ> A 0
94-01 ,F 413 q"v (0/,!v .9 71.?, _-2. ?0 R=230 00 15*58'02 THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
,) ,� <RCBDH (FD) 78-:14 CY %_
'3B'OU '30'15"
L=/b.24 =91
N83 4
DISTURBED z LOT 17 R=270.0o
)8 P--+ S6.1. .07 0) PROPOS�D 00
CO Q) 9'27,1,1,, L=79.85
3/4/2016 DRAIN 7. t--44- 4 -1. R=50-00 0(6 SALEM 2.SECTION IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES
t� 9 _55
(FD) 8,233 S.F. 00 4 12',3
CBDH EASEMENT
SEE DETAIL A 'y "Fg. 79 2,30 L=95.9 ZD CONSERVATION CUL—DE—SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500
'1� I ==27 R-2 36'75,, L:zz4.85-00 Rz=59.00
DISTUR13ED 0 IT 0
�">o 19:2 7 1__j
1.6 Id I �-YO.00 COMMISSION FEET IN LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF,
3/4/20 -<,54 'U0 =tz25'25 16" 0 09*54'22" 06-0011
_>9 C�
1 ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR
DETAIL: .00 PARCEL A t_- .5�
C� .35
8z=25'25'16" 1 6. ROAD AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
NOT TO SCALE R-230'13
S85-12FO9"E 00 R�230.00 \___ ()0 —
61 0
ot S84*21'59 '0 4
17.41 0 L=z -IL48'* 9.60
b6-40 '54, 10205 4" '0 (6 DH (FD)
0 TRAN 2014 S84*21'59"E R=270.00 1SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS
ill-. 101.80
REALTY TRUST 74-21 "1 11� L=55-23 4-- , br-ro N85-99 _5"E - 7/25/2016
If U)ca S84-2 1'59 LOT 18 230 00 �.4 POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO
"E 130 6 1'43' /07��. ::z25-2 1 1,39 2,0 END OF WjL
5 11,644 S.F. v� —A=11'43'
06-0019 Jx-
45"E BE 3 "' CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER,
161) tzzz -00 N8E 2
0
0 FO- 'D 11, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2)
k, R �T ,
TADEUSZ 149"20'37" LI) 48" VLO 1 0)
1136. P076 j 2
L 0 0' 2,5
0
30.33, p, 0 0
q CLARK AVENUE 11:V1 TREES PER LOT.
& JOANNA LOT 19 00 1 4 IN 60
4�,Q 4Q UNIMPROVED) 4__0 —
P, 1�21 - e� "?- -7,) (0 M
BARCIKOWSKI 0) Q) 10,498 S. ( ' WIDE .Q) 0 CD NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO
ry Ili F. CA 40 71598 236
VN ON LC PLAN 0)
AS SHOV VL . —(d
'0 06-0017 c,* zo 5) 0.0-90 -128*35 56"
0 (SHEETS 3 AND 1 481, AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS.
(TO BE ABANDONED) q tx R-50-00 DH (FD)
=112.22
C�- LOT 24 (0 3/17/2016
R�z5o
L--;, -00 IN LEDGE Pj
S84*21 12,636 S.F. 2 C?N
'53 _j 4 4-96 C1q
"E N ro
LOT 25 f-\
99.76 00 0
25-21 SOUT[q 4 C) 11
:��! , I<Do co 7,904 S.F. 0)
'PO 4,3 -00 74-53 d NI) �p 0
&__30
9
t6 DH (FD)
0
r 'Ib 7/25/2016
0 PARCEL B 1?_�, -, N , 40.00
CY RIDGE <<,
END OF WALL
C 0" 16,144 S.F.- 70, 05 LOT 26
7,853 S.F.
IRCLE 4 S82*49'loll CITY OF SALEM
P 'LO <- "�,
-.1 0C_ E
0.,9 ,51 -0
Co. 4j 7 81.05 PL N OARD
0
LOT 20 45,0 LOT 23
8,251 S.F. 6
(MI 0) S
0).(() 0)/ C'v
!v) �0 11)
44v 14,709 S.F 1Z., 04�'
CY 6.6 0).
i-3
40 fv R=145.00 0�.
C'v C6. V
R 5 L=10.69
35
:550-00 -0
L
53" 6 =4*13'21"
=63' 5'
U) LOT 22
Q 00 0
C), q 7,630 S.F. R-1
> 'A 0
0. to
LOT 21 LOCA 10-N
0 r- En SCALE[ C\j ----- ---
?7 5b' 9,404 S.F.
(41)/ 0
co!0 52 _p:I N E LIN E
rri
(IV' 610s, -37
----------------
65 C,
0 ....... 107.14
N8,3*46
cl�
119.97
N83-46'53"E 205.37 z
19i JO E 227.11
Y) 6'53"
N_ -�i 21.74
-------------- -------
J,-, PROPOSED
'31 76 DRAIN
EASEMENT
SURU .4Q
0 ISABELLE WIRYO
C'V Aj
06-0015 ------------------------
C)
DH (FD)
C� 3/4/2016
C14
DATE:
Pj
\A10
LOT 27
00
1� 147,992 S.F. zo
a (NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A SEPARATE BUILDING LOT)
C\
OPEN SPACE 2
AREA=134,685. S.F.
PLAN REFERENCES::
(47,400± S.F. WETLANDS) Ln
DH (S)
8/23/2016 1 ) LAND COURT PLAN 7159—. B
2) LAND COURT PLAN 7159—X
3) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-2
4) AN UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED "DEFINITIVE
SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHIAPEL HILL, SALEM,
MASSACHUSETTS" DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED
THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY EASTERN LAND
SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY
10) SALEM PLANNING BOARD).
7,3
SEAL OF
JAMES E. CONNICK
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 06-0005 DH (S) (YR MKS Ill
ZONE: ONE—FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE—FAMILY na.
(R1) (R1) CLUSTER 8/23/2016
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) 0 DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F. (NONE) Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% 6 Land Court 6/11/20116
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT S80'23'22"E 523 S80-26'03,,E 347.30 5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016
.56
MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 115 FT 4 No changes to this sheet 1/22/2016
MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT $ 10 FT 3 No changes to this sheet 12/07/2015
MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 3 0 FT 30 FT 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015
-LYNN SAND & STONE
C/O AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 11 Lot line 18/19; Notes 9/4/2015
06-0012 DH (S) NO. REVISION DATE
8/23/2016 DEFINITIVE PLAN
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN IP (FD)
N 3/17/2016 "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION
DATE: 1:t
SUBDIVISION (0
0
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO SALEM, MASSACHUSE17S
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY PLAN OF LAN*D CkNER:
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS .BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY 1i8 WALLACE ROAD
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. IN I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS DRAWN FROM ANI ACTUAL SURVEY MADE LYNN, MA 01901 056,36057
ON THE GROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND COURT INSTRUCTIONS LC CERTS 36055,36
OF 2006 BETWEEN MARCH 4, 2016 AND AUGUST' 23, 2016. APPLICANT: WILLIAMS
NSD REALTY TRUST &
CITY CLERK MASSACHUSETTS 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPARAGES
SALEM . EDM ACCURACY ±(3 MM + 2 PPM) = (0.0098 FT + 2 PPM) LYNN, MA 01905 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURMi
TRAVERSE PRE 189 NORTH MAIN STREET
0, 20' 40' 80' 120' CISION (RAW) = 1 :21 ,686 PROJECT LOCUS: SUITE 101
I I LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE (RAW) 0.13 FEET MIDDLETON,MA 01949
OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: SCALE: 1 "=40' DATE: MARCH 17, 2016 DIRECTIONAL ERROR OF CLOSURE N41'W CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE:(978)539-8088
TOTAL PARCEL AREA=749,531 S.F. FAX:(978)539-8200
MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 149,906 S.F. (20% OF TOTAL) ASSESSORS REFERENCE: S WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 144 TO 153 AND CLARK AVENUE ON MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9
(MIN. OPEN SPACE UPLAND REQUIRED = 74,953, WHICH IS 50% OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED) LC PLAN 7159B & LOT 375 ON LC - PLAN 7159-2 DATE: 0' 20' 40' 80'
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 302,977 S.F. ------------------------------------ ------ DEFINITIVE SHEET 2 OF 2
(OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROVIDED 211 ,300± S.F.) PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
SCALE: 1"=40'
AUGUST 14, 2015 SHEET 3 OF 11
J
SEE PROFILE SHEET 2 ROPOSED DMH
% % ,O\
ZP RIM-140-8 0 1 C%IFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
50 4
12" W-136.06 so, 7,f WITH HE RULES AND REGULATIONS
P ROPOSED SMH %P 15* INV- 50 A7k-5 3 rp I OFJHE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
A
RIM=T.B.D. f-- = A .05
-5b 9 C', .00
2 .00 qR?
INV=131.66 \0 0,c�-�74SO ,,EN. SPA I CE 1 PREPARIN IS PLAN.
;Iez '1& C�fr 0 13 �-/So-
HYD -0 0 PROP. CONTROL
r STRUCTURE
SMH ING:0)
RIM-122.83
Rim 1365.�7 S f S 1 1119 18* LEVEL 0 118.00
Inv.=131.4 S PROPOSED FES WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
Q� V oRinCE 0 118.00 12" INV-1 14.00
PROPOSED SMH 'C' 646-1 8* ORInCE 0 120.50
13 RIM=138.33 7,142-
INV=133.33 ;,��O� -%% -, 11 7% 12' HOPE INV.-1114.50 PROPOSED 18* NOTE: ALL TRAP ROCK
pVC SEWER W 4+63.17 INV-1118.0 IN BASIN 4 TO BE
S=0 S 561 -0 (SET-LEVEL) 2' DIAMETER STONE
S 5 �L2
(I-2 �"7- 2- PROPOSED FES
lb 0 INFILTRATION BASIN 4 18' INV-122.00 PROPOSED SHALLOW
x TOP OF FOREBAY-122.0 DMH RIM-126.5
3
1+30.00 Hff�DT qell - /P- - DOWN TO 1 1 0'± TF A-1
b,->' -C I V 01 (HYdroCAD Pond 144P) 41 SPILLWAY 0 121.5 18* INV-122.58
12- -1495
I Up OF BERM=I Z2 5 CkiW`- BOTTOMI-120.0
UAIL C,--- S66!7�
TP OSI E N BOTTOM OF BERM.117.0 L--" It
4+74.118� 0, "'k, `6�
N �1 -/
ESHGWT BE 132'± A
L�O , (�j 1 81 EMER,;ENCy SPILLWAY 0
r
122.0 J
4111 0
41.b -cq
as $01I
CP
I
C',
DPE
10� 3,�f7T J.
D
RIM=137.0
Q� PROPOSED DMH
0+30.00 INV=132.54 0,
OC '0 7s--13
R--.30 00 %K
14 % 7�5`�d
"�S
Sn' 0 6
L0 611
PROPOSED CB LT 'Eup, (140 5'1
bIA110N=0+00.
N TF.:153 0
bVV - 50'
RIM=129.00 A
143 0 TF=151.o
LLj 12* INV=1125-25 0.2.4 LA
152.0 CF=141.0 50
325)
C) 50' GF=150.0 10 ISO LA
-0
$ 1 7 -1 - Cp- .0
311-1) 50'
0+00.0 wNG S 110 0 - 5()' �-,�Ajl
PROPOSED smimDrr &,. -119 0 ?
WI-f IMPERVIUU:) -PROPOSED 18" 8+2 1 1-, (14 0
PROP TP 1-1 f, 50'
S-Im 0+40 23RT 11-� ESHCWT OE,1� INV=132.75 L�11979
OIL SEPARATOR -�2) 3.1 9+72-49 J
8" TAPPING RRIFK PROPOSEDDMH
SLEEVE & TRIPLE RIMe-130.8
GATES Ir INV IN-124.68 PROPOSED sToRmwATER wxkGrMENT AV TO 2, (SET LIEVEL) 00 6 S 7 RIM-139.0
AREA [HydroCAD POND 78P] 41 -79+34
12" INV OUT-124. X8. -79+34
79+34 18* INV-134.5
��4%, 't.1!31 jr,
(SUBSURFACE INFLTRATION S!RUC11IRE) S=0.65% PROP. DW
PROPOSED CB RT- (40)�TE 330XL CHAMBERS 6+95.29 E 30 RIM-144.6± -09'45 E
0 CSME-125.94 2:3.1
F jpC N85
STATION=0+00 TOP OF CKAMBERS-125.44 f T P -41 V e-1 8 00 12' IWS -141.50 IN 9.60
RIM=127.75 y 12' INV IN-124.33 rio E-11-1 ---- I -W 18" INV-141.00 OUT
1p, BOTTOM OF CHAMBERS-122.90 DC)WN TO 129'±
Ut BOTTOM OF SMNE-122.4
12" IW=125.25 WIDE SO-EAWAL�=�� 9, - 12- PE S=1-467-
-7- (INSTALL INSPECTION PORTS OAT 0% r R=27 .00
V) Z ,-�) C; 1321 L=55.23 10+01 CITY OF SAL-EM
U THE END OF EACH ROY, -- P // + 10+48-56PT p RD
-,p 0+18.12 C3
INFILTRATION BASIN 1 C 0 T
Z- 7479-18 p
(HydroCAD Pond 142P) SEE PROFILE SHEET 2 18 -2 �op* CF-41LD, Q�
TOP OF BERM=136-5
BOTTOM OF BERM=1320 0+23.33
@
PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE or
81 EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 0 136.0 RIM=142.50 10+83.75
D NMI- cf- re 0.23
I\N 'YtD�0 -N85*
EXIST. DMH--- 4" ORIFICE 0 132.75 GLAPK AVENUE U 09'45"E
J?-
7. 0
41 SPILLWAY 0 132.5 744
RIM=124.16 TOP OF FOREBAY-1133.0 (TO BE t.A\ A
INV=119. 8* ORIFICE 0 134.00 x- 5
N 10" ORIFICE 0 134.50 ABANDONED) U,
0
/Z BOTTOM OF FOREBAY-1311.0 % - �,1 '
12* RCP IW.=131.50 49.-
�151�(' 0
X�\ S
CV
CP sl�� 04
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS CpZ7 741 LLI
0
01 0
MONITORING WELL
FIRE HYDRANT
"s, z
Ld
WATER GATE
UJ 0
CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) CD
Pir7=124-96 -------------------------
jny=NA. (Water Volves visibie)
UTILITY POLE 1-1.
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
LIGHT POLE llvrl \ . .",I'll (/) LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED ------------------------
0- f DATE: ---- ----------- - '11\
lv� 1.SECTION IV AAJ WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY (230) FEET
DRAIN MANHOLE @ HYD. CLERK OFTHE V CITY OF SALEM, DO FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ------------------------
SEWER MANHOLE f HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THF NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY 2.SECTION IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN LENGTH, AND IN
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
CONC = CONCRETE OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY DATE: ----Y-!/JLW--
SBDH = STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE 14 DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. 3.SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE .3 1" CALIPER,
FND FOUND x/ 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT.
'y
WCR WHEEL CHAIR RAMP -------------- --------- NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS.
CITY CLERK
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
-i -j
IROD IRON ROD
TREE V� N
M +040 + 0
:2 L0 (0 0 00(-4
Ltj
V) LLJ�8
o\ + 0 C M to
EXISTING CONTOUR 0 to OR r- a) �2 V) r-
+M(0
C3 00,4--
V)z'.4" 0 ::i> 0 ;�:�i> af
W Of 00 q -,0
oo-- EL in Fx 0- V) c6c6
PROPOSED CONTOUR ------- -------
V) z Ld
0- V) +(0
Ae CC,)' M> oo-_ 0(y)0 a: L0
EP It, I r 11 r� 11 g- r-� :2 (N
EDGE OF PAVEMENT ---------------------- a-U) 0- F 11 11 W C*4
0 Z-41- > +C,4 U) +
0-1 0 060 '� 0'-t(D
Of PROPOSED 0- V) a-- SEAL
VGC m n 0-00- -0
V)(0 0 r� 11
VERTICAL GRANITE CURB Q� 04 U)Zt > Ld C14 0
+Col.) a.En cr-- 00- Z V)Z .0, 3. OF
1-3 V) 0 Lr)pr)
00 -M C) I-)0�01) a-F: II - 0 0:� a: . 0 0 L0
-C, il - M cc :� q -i r,
- 11 It - -<j 0
PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES 00 c)T)0 (LL),z Lnt a-COE 0 > 0+
:2 LQ n 0 bo-�2 H 1-1 :! X:M 01) 10
+
N C) Lj 11 a-p a.
+00 ,4- U)z--t > 0 L'i 4 Y) H C)0 0--t
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION �<- > V)z-It > >
Ono 00- a� 00- zz
La -
I
CL a_U)Of Z- a_-
11 <�la, >
2 -
t 0 . 61 wo- 7- j
o 0- -- X N co CL -
_3 U)Z't > 0<:2
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION 0) oi= 11 1 9 -
0-U)
Milt
0 a-auiaf
:Z.0 CL
ZO U)in
+ C4
t- 2: aw-
-j U) 0 DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
C4
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
:2 0 j 12 HOP
014- (0 Ui w Z:-0�t S 61op 7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
+ PO I I -(-)- �HDPE HDPE 6 Land Court 6/1/20116
1-1 1-1 COL�z 11 --- --- S-7. 611.
0 > > 2;!�M> IS2=
+ U)
�f 0- - :!� a-U)Fy K 56% 5 Drainage Pipe Slopes 1/29/2016
a: 00 01 C-4(714 n 0 F- 11
>C,1 LO 1 06 Ki NJ
0 r- Ix- 9 2�IN 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016
Vi u),z 11)n a- (nm -
0 +L0 F) O,o--
0 - a- �= 11 11 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015
00
z V) >
10 UN >
UJI U) W �- -En 2 Testpits; Infiltration Basin designation 11/10/2015
to uo_ zz
/+04 0-�7- 11 S= I Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/412015
D �2 B V
S ER
Lr- NO. REVISION DATE
011W 0 z --"'SEWER & WATER APPRO> RIGHT
/ �n LL
10 LESS THAN 10' STA. 3+52 PVC SEWER
Of M '0
O_ C)V)0� �4 SEPARATION VERT. SEP.=4.3' DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
0 STA. 2+83 1
iVERT. SEP.=1.7' 1 8" PVC SEWER S=0.65%
8" Pvfl- 5 WOODLANDS ROAD
0 :S=0.5,7j. PVC S
0
0
3:
0
04 U
'bWNER:
< +L0
MOP
m 11 c6
af 0 BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
,N 0 Z C-4 >
M O- Z
0 0 to a-F- 11 18 WALLACE ROAD
+V) CA 0<--;:-- -
of t-- LYNN, MA 01901
a-Un) -1-7%",
V)z Cq > LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
oo- z:
oi:: 11 -3.54% APPLICANT: WILLIAMS
W 9:� -.4
a_En Of 500 V Na - 1 .66% %r-jo,vc- NSD REALTY TRUST
5.00% 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPARAGES
0 15l' oto to LO 0 L0 0 0 0 0 V) r- 0) re) 0 0 0 r1r) 00 00 It -o- 0 co 0) 'o- C14 (71 COP co to 0) ff) In C14 t- 0 (0 0 00 ENGINEERS I MANNERS I SU
OLO to - 0 P! to Cq o n T4,� C! n n cl(o -q O� r- P� r- - U� lr�(0 o 0 (C! N C! (0 Cq <p to 'q: C! --tq Oq - IR -q- q C-4 V)
(0 C, 0 r! C14 n OR 0 n 00 C� - ,* - LYNN, MA 01905
C! Iq r1z 4,or �"O� C! r-�L'i r� T`� O� C!n C! CO- 0 0 oui 60) 0) 0)(6 6 0) 4 CID 4 00 L6 r- T- L6 r- r- r�p- Co 06 (0 6 (o 189 NORTH MAIN STREEr
0 re) cc) -4- Lo (p r-(6 OD q 0) 0 -4- C4 C6 te) 6 -t 4 LO 1111 tl� co Vi P� 0i 00 600 0)60) p6 0) 6 0 6 0 0
c600 000) Ln tn U) Lo to LO r- U-) r- L0 r-0 LO r, to (0 to to (.0 LO LO 14:11to Lnul U-) Ln LO 0 U)-q- -t 4- 0-n K) 0- n -q- K) --0- 4- to 't 't 't SUITE 101
C14 04 ro C14 04 te) rl> to U PROJECT LOCUS: MIDDLETON,MAO]949
PHONE:(978)539-8088
DATUM= CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA FAX:(978)539-8200
8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50
WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM
1 +00 1+50 2+00 2+50 -43 C4 MC 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9
00 0+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+0 6+50 7+00 7+50 ASSESSORS REFERENCE:
125.00 0
0
0 Of
0 F- 12- (L [L
0' 20' 40' 80,
W- IL a_
0- r- C14 00 0) 0 PROFILE SHEET I 'OF 2
C) 0 00 WOODLANDS ROAD C14 0 CF) + 0) -q- n 00
C14 +
to rl- CO SCALE: 1"=40'(HOR) & 4 (VER-0
C5 C; 0
n to r� + + 0 to CY) + + + -
+ + + + + + 0) 0) SHEET 4 OF 11
+ + 00
0 (0 AUGUST 14, 2015
T
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN SEE PROFILE SHEET 1
DATE: ---- ------- --- - 0000, V,C)
C,-Z-,5 4
4_-CD
LC CASE- 7159 PROPOSM SHALLOW 0.
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO DMH RIM-137.5
0. 15" INV-134.25 14e 3;
0 `0
0 0.
OD C3 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
%
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS NOTE- ALL �P ROCK %
02 OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY IN BASIN Tp_� % I
2 TO E
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT. AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. 1' DIAMETER NE Ito 46
7+71.�8
to Cq
U-)Vt L0
U) n 511-
Lf) 3
PROPOSED15"
--------------------- FES INV IN-133.0 V)U
C`1
C)0 'A 0+23.33 PROPOSED 2' INTO SED!khli FOREMY
CITY CLERK
FES IW-121.0
.7 TOP-130.0
102 41 SPILLWAY'O 129.5
BOTTOM-128.0
;x
.
00 LJ
C,
00 0+1'
,po 0
C @ pv(,
to 0.50"o,
+ '7
0-20.16 j
0-c 41
10 1 CERTIFY THAT' I HAVE CONFORMED
7 5 WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
(D PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE 44
RIM=132.83 x)re) OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
2.5* ORIFICE 0 128.50 ro tn P EPARING IS PLAN.
C) 6+95.29 0 K)rf)
12* RCP INV. OUT=127.50 0
Ln
0- 11 11
10 OPEN
PROPO ED 18" <1 10, Ile
" �,V__ 10,
SPACE HDPE IW.=128.50
'Ib
o WILLIAMS SPARAGES LLC
(SET LEVEL)
CD
SXR TION BBASIN 2
1+72.82 INFILTRA
- UGW U) to
(HydroCAD Pond 143P) Ln
18 TOP OF BERM=132.5
1+97
17 BOTTOM OF BERM=128.0 CR Tn
NO 21 0 V.-
I,
8'L EMERGENCY 0-
0
SPILLWAY 0 132.0 C(_-7-
fa
0
0
T
-50
U')
4/0S
to
C� ---- , 0
5) J\ \\ -_ 1%
PROPOSED FES
CL_
12* INV=126.50 0
INTO SEDIMENT FOREBAY
1-14 d,�p.
TOP=126.0 0
PROP614E�� 41 SPILLWAY 0 1:25.5
DBLGRAlt C '.3
sTxnoi,i_�+93.4� BoTrom=124.01
,*2
RIM- .43 c�
12" 1 1".43
12" HIjpE j)RAIW
P INFILTRATION BASIN 3
(HydroCAD Pond 152P)
6'W RIP-RAP CHANNEL TOP OF BERM=1 18.5
C a q (SEE DErAIL SHEET 1 OF 4) BOTTOM OF BERM=1 15.0 CITY OF SALEM
2+93. PROP. DROP DMH 81 EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 0 118.0 PL BOARD
RIM-149.8*
0. 12" INV-141.25 IN V
+98.99 "IN N. 12' INV-138.0 OUT
0. PROPOSED 18"
IW=115.50
1 12* FES HDPE
20 (SET LEVEL) INV.=1 13.00
INFILTRATION BASIN 1 1 W/RIP RAP
PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE NOTE: ALL TRAP ROCK
IN BASIN 3 TO BE
RIM=136.50 1' DIAMETER STONE
z 4* ORIFICE 0 132.50
A
< C) 8" ORIFICE 0 134.00 PROPO -4 PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE
< 10" ORIFICE 0 134.50 �;WgcD I RIM=1 18.83 46
12" RCP IW.=131.50 12."OPE ftj Afc- GP,4SS SW i�ld�-I I -
C) 0 DEr It 8* ORIFICE 0 115.50
IV FHC6K D 12" RCP IW.=113.50
0 SHC6 144S
OF
4)
0
PROPOSED FES --------- ---- ----
3:1 12" IW=129.75
W/RIP RAP APRON
-----------------------
:2 0 -------- -------
(A 0)
+Lf)Lo F-
0 o r-� Pf
ul
�2 V)Z Lf)
00- -------------------------
0; �F= 11
C14 2;�M> V) r-
+ a_V) a �;;�,
�10 6 Vi DAJ
V, z E -------
0 0
-4ppRO)( M C14
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
V) C14 5�' 00- F- 11 U) 00
M I r1)0 _::.APPR0)( > +00
Ld 0 Cq C� 60j N O�
U) Z 0 --La- IF 04 0) MONITORING WELL
0 0 U) Z
CL 0 0 C�
V)
0 M 0)
> 0 <:2 0+po FIRE HYDRANT
Cr >
a_ U)E 0
PROPOSED 6- U)Fx Uj
V W) 1106 11
<Zt >
0 of 0 z SEAL
ft.�F
0 WATER GATE
cc-mj ow
.wk
CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) D
VWA
UTILITY POLE CO3 4M
J."
LIGHT POLE
El DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
DRAIN MANHOLE @ WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET. 9
PRO�_OSTED
�VATER_ SEWER MANHOLE 7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
6 Land Court 6/1/2016
CONC = CONCRETE 5 Rip Rap Channel detail note 1/29/2016
STA. 0+87 STA. 0+94 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016
VERT. SEP.=5.9' --VERT. SEP.=5.8' SBDH = STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE
SEWER & WATE 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015
LESS THAN 10 2 Testpits; infiltration Basin designation 11/10/2015
SEPARATION FND FOUND
I Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/4/20115
8" PVC s=0,5% WCR WHEEL CHAIR RAMP NO. REVISION DATE
pVC S=0.5%
8. p S=0.5% N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
IROD IRON ROD
0 0� SOUTH RIDGE CIRCLE
0 TREE (D
0 LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
C� EXISTING CONTOUR
50 VC 1 .00% 50'VC 1.SECTION IV A.1.f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY OWNER:
.0 (230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS PROPOSED COOTOUR ------ni�---- BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
(D CY) to to (0 00 0 LO 0 C14 0 fl- to 0 Id- 04 0 SHOWN ON PLANS. 18 WALLACE ROAD
C� C'10 0 Lq LQ �t Lq - c'! f*,� tq U�0 C*! "'D rn C! 1p 'Roo (D C! EP
00 6 0 in .4: ti r'i 0 0 0 r'i C:) 0 C-10 0) 0) 60) 00 EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - - - - - - - - LYNN, MA 01901
Ln W) too U*) 10(14 U-)
0 10 LD ul to in Low W) to 0 to LO 0 U) tf) LO U LO
2.SECTICIN IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN VGC LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
&
DATUM=135.00 LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN VERTICAL GRANITE CURB WILLIAMS
APPLICANT:
0+0
0+50 1 +00 1+50 2+00 2+50
C4 ON PLANS. NSD REALTY TRUST
C4 C4 C4
PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPARAGES
DOMM I KMNERS I SURMORS
0
(0 (0 0 0') 0) 2 189 NORTH MAIN STREET
C) 0:� SOUTH It- 3.SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 LYNN, MA 01905
C� 0- a- a_ IL 01 O� C�
V') 00 CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROJECT LOCUS: SUITE 101
0 00 0 01 0) MIDDUTON,MA 01949
C\I 0 0 C-4 V) C14 00 �LARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE,(978)539-8088
1`0 RIDGE - + +. SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
I I + - NO C� -Id N N NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. FAX:(978)539-8200
0 0 00 +
- C14 c6 01 C14 ASSESSORS REFERENCE: WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM
+ + LC) CIRCLE + + MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 S
00 +
0 0' 20' 40' 801
PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 2
SCALE: I"=40'(HOR) & 4'(VER1)
AUGUST 14, 2015 1 SHEET 5 OF I I
WF D28 x 112.66 WF D22
PROPOSED \1 12.38 x 112.2 x 112.33 311.84 x 111.60
MAINTENANCE WF D23
WF D24 WF D21
RE __mii *x-UJ.83
D22 WF -x4.1,0.52
FOR SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE BASIN USE A MI VEHICLE ACCESS x 111.66 WF D20
OF GRASS SEEDS CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING PER�MODIC 111.3 WF D26 x 112.31 113.16 x 113.55 x 113.02 111,98 x 106.06
DURING SUMMER (TYP) .107.57
INUNDATION UNDER WATER, AND DROUGHT TOLERANT x 113.12 x
8 1��
JE_A1VETTE_TF70RI0N �114.37-- x 113.77- 02 A4 VF D19 GEORGE M. &
07-0008 ALFRED & _JOAN ti4- x 108.X' x 106.12 GAIL L. FIALHO
Ld
FRANCES LUCIAN WF D18 07-0003
Q 11 6- COUISE P`.-SLEISOIq__. PAUL, PAU LETT�, J 0 H N \�1?7 79
JOSEPH & LORRAINE M.
x 105.01
07-,0007 __118 x 109.22 GAGNE TRUST
-.97-0005 & SCOTT �EB NC ILIR & ESMA HYSENESHI C)
07-0076
------ W"D 17 07-0002 WILLIAM M. MONROE, JR.
NW _j
x.108.2. 07-0086
ESAM Y.4iABDELGADIR
3-
WF )Dil&.2
07-0001
PROP.
4-W-TRAIL 128
RICHARD L. O'DAY OPEN SPACE 1 ze__� - I__ "
POSED DM-1 108.00 1 x 105.03
03-0137 __(TyP PRO 132 LlMiT _QF1 00' BUFfER ZONE 105.16
x 111\WF
-�O'LT --E
STATION 2:F40 -134 FROM -DQE- OF, B VA D15
R 0-:8
D
11*% --12 INV=136.06 WF IDIA.48 I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
PROPOSED SIVIH 3 B
105.16
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
RIM=137.77
x 105.7
INV=132.61 /TP/ELEV=1 33'± ------ \7
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
�VN TO 123' ell PREPARING T IS PLAN.
S OPEN SPACE 1
fJ�SHGVIT OBSERVE
------ x 102.92
> 144�
\WF D13
7 146 x 104.96 EDGE OF BORDERING FOR SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE BASIN USE A MIXTURE
-.0 x 106.3)\ OF GRASS SEEDS CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING PERIODIC ----- --------
10 TION UNDER WATER, AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
,,�VEGETATED WETLANDS INUNDA WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
LA DUIRING SU MER (TYP)
C, 6 PROPOSED LIMIT OF EROSION CONTROL
'Oor, LA - VAI
25' MIN. OFF OF EDGE OF B.V.W.
.,00, 0 G-,143.0 1/ 0ol x IM.63
42.5 x 105.05
50158- ---------- x 105.94 WF Dl
-50
PROPOSED SMH \.000 0- F D 11 x 105.53 X 104.77 ,x 105.82
148 7,4 x 104.87 WF D7
r'--WF D10 x.<81
0 RIM=T!B.D. % WF D8 10506
Wt U9 x 105.34
INV=131.66 6 x 108.62 x 106.22
6
Nk JF
7 0 x 106.14 15P21
x 107.62 x 105.�87
WE). 7 L�o "N, WF D2
x 105.67
77- x 108.52 x 105.17
;M W6� /,o/ol ---7 x 5.39 x 105.22
I x 106.96
91 S S l<Q0 WF D5 WF D4 WF D3 x 106.1 12
A3 -7,r--
i05.58
'A-407-55
.3 1 5.
C PROPOSED SMH
'C�, -xr98.9jrL x 107.27 x 106.71
RIM=l'
INV=133.33
0
a" -.,o,. 1110 PROP.
El CITY OF SALEM
JEFFREY M. & 02 2
ELLEN T. ROGATO 'o ........... 2.5 p BOARD
T 1�4,_ i_"'
02-0046 (Typk
IE i!=
-010i
_fl , -
1 37'± 0 -51- cr 4�f:
C,
bp- 34.Z�;,
ESHGWT B",?W L10
Y Xl� IN V 7 11 U 7:,
Z_
0 60 7
01
11-J,
r
13 J_
54 �4
7j
152 --------------Z_2!�b
C,
12�
s
7
1141
16 L�0
40
'A
(3 (0-
105 50' 1-
2 9 / " 8-
1_� FF=15 11.0
N
GF=tz 43.C) b LA
n CF=14 11.0
1/A,, 52.0 1-)
GF=I 5CDAj
_15
7j, 11,�J 14 50 5 '
opo - 5o' 110
Vl� -1 PROPOSED
PROPOSED Al I G V4 C, 5 MAINTENANCE
M R 0 LU) 1�lvplz HICLE ACCESS --------
AINTENANCE
I %, Z41
VEHICLE-ACCESS PRUP(OSED BARRIEK ;1/01 v
CULTEC SYSTEM op,
7
/�ALEM
'5
'V(IA N 0 N�;-,
4V I - NO
7
-166-- COSERVATION
OMMISSION ------------------------
-'4f4 0"\ S 0 -
IV I I -_ - .06-0011
8+061\., 8+23.11 PC
TP 162 V W W-------- 9+
V ------------
N..
\\N '4A SZ- 7- B
TRAN 2014 )�,_ �1_ 10+00
VZ4�'j Y/0, P.0
C). g + 10+48.56PT DATE:
1r -- - '--/ '1 0 - - N ---
REALTY TRUST O'Lp e S
Z_ f, 06-0019 148. / 0
__ * %.. IV " /
N-15 f
EUSZ
EXIST. DIVIH JOANNA
N
I \1 N
RIM=124.16 BARCIKOWSKI
(�' /Fz,
INV=119.3 06-0017 A�Z 4 (T(, BE ABANLq� cr- Is 7.
s, N '44,0 C-1
r
0, 50'
148. 15A.0
S - (0
e-1 \ 41(� 1.,
I __ X13 Z)
11
SUUTH
cp� 0
G -7
0
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
PROPOSED
MAINTENANCE ilk W_ Ktoo -[1421-
VEHICLE ACCESS MATC
MONITORING WELL 'Y' ExiZIING CRADE
Je-
401
1@0S
1���/, lool
FIRE HYDRANT WF Bll
J�
SAM �Pump-Assume,j) 142.27 WF B10
R;m=124_56 o- 141.
lnv=N.A. V-1 0E� I IN A55. 0- 94
WATER GATE (WI-ter &lvofvas visfble) 20 1 DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
G 10
CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) 4 1 5�5 --%T:ff28 WF Ba
143.12 7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
7 Q LOCATM
WS 45.() ON, Rl
CF 7 WF 89�rli;2111_�
_E WF Bll--.'TTI WF B2 141.88
CAI
S 6/11/2016
GF=151.5 1 142.08
UTILITY POLE UNE t�l -7 NON- 6 Land Court
14234
x 50 '46 x 143.66 x 142.06
144. JURISDICTIONAL 5 Remove Future Parking Area 1/29/2016
5
14 ISOLATED
WF B3 143.36
4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016
LIGHT POLE N�
WETLAND
Ci I I\
x 44 5 WF B7 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015
83
x,(,,0.08 ACRE Fl� 14�_36
142.79 2 Testpits; Infiltration Basin designation 11/10/2015
DRAIN MANHOLE @ 1,4 WF B4
142.07
7 _4 I Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015
141.64
x 43-33 x
SEWER MANHOLE WF B6
WF BE NO. REVISION DATE
142.01
llT7r94 '
PROP.
x 142.63
CONC = CONCRETE .7
/IV TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
PROPOSED STON --- 4'W TRAIL
SBDH = STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE
CHECK DAMS 50'± O.C. (TYP)
"THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION
-2
FND FOUND 415 CP OPEN SPACE
SURYA & REFUS;�e n�0!08 t I/VF-/t r, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
TP 1-2 ELEVN 6'±
WCR WHEEL CHAIR RAMP f
RA rlotV ESHOWT @ 11t, 0
w OWNER:
ISABELLE WIRYO \\
SAL 0 1 t 0
N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY 06-0015 _N 1 0 BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
0.
Its 4VITRAIL 18 WALLACE ROAD
IROD IRON ROD S 18 -------
(T-yp
PR P.'
12 LYNN, MA 01901
TREE LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: WILLIAMS
ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY
EXISTING CONTOUR NSD REALTY TRUST
DATE: ----- -------- (Rl) , (1) (Rl) CLUSTER 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPARAGES
MINEM I PLANNM I SURMORS
PROPOSED CONTOUR ---- LYNN, MA 01905 189 NORTH MAIN STREET
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, D)O MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 1 00 , FT 150 FT (NONE) SUITE 101
EP HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) SEAL PROJECT LOCUS: MIDDLE`r(W,MA 01949
EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - - - - - - - HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS 4A CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE:(978)539-8088
VGC THE PLANNING BOARD MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F. (NONE) Of 104'�,, -I I FAX:(978)539-8200
VERTICAL GRANITE CURB OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% 4 ASSESSORS REFERENCE: S WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM
DAYS NEXT AFTER SYCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING 'OF SAID NOTICE. MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT willip" 07 S MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9
CIVL V"v
PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES V . 0' 20' 40' 80'
MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET I OF 2
----------- MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 10 FT
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
CITY CLERK MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 30 FT
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET 6 OF 11
-;11016 AUGUST 14, 2015
2's
Q� E
4
40
10)
50' Q2 1)
2 -7
ll-=151.0 -
CF=141.0 -1 A.5s.0
C PROPOSED
50
Ij ox" lei�46:9� .MAINTENANCE
PROPOSED %" \ "
POSLL)
ING CF. 0
I PE OU 1-7:4 -VEHICLE ACCESS
MAINTENANCE !InN %,ft 10
V .01
PROPOSED-�' BARRIF-K 0 %Vf) N 14 � -
Ld VEHICLE ACCESS CULTEC SYSTEM 0, 7 /,�ALEM
ATION
3 7,
4L
80�to,
Y(j ZMMISSION
76 06-0011
F23.1 I PC
W W-
'77
'111 - -. w----_
'y
-U'157..11KC
TRAN 2014 N 10+00 j0+45.W)Pr
z 4- - I".--it. I—- - 000�
N4�j 't 75 7�p S 6 / 11
$\ REALTY TRUST 0 kp .- 0 - - - -- T)
It - (D 44.1
Z
06-0019
-1 5A -Q!�8
EUSZ
<--71-
n OANNA N% %% t ;-\
C!) 01 lu;7 I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
EXIST. DMH 1-11 BARCIKOWSKI \41. I\x 41 WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
RIV=124.16 10 o0tLAW, NED)
INV=119.3 BE ASAN�1'1 .,5,-
06-0017 6 1 C_4 OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
__CF_
Z PREPARING INS PLAN.
148. 6iD 50
A
0 �X- ----------
C, -/��o
WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
S 0
�01
$1 PROPOSED
142
MAINTENANCE ilk I I '
VEHICLE ACCESS MATC TO
A Q, %S%
.07- �p b)o ExiSTING GRAI)ES 143.5
.0 0
V
'010
WF B11
SAM (Pulrp—Assu.med) 00,
Rim=124,56 2 WF B10
4 - 1 -155.5 (,' ---
V 0.
V- 14B-U 'o. 0
lnv=N.A. Oitater vaivesvis;bte)
2@0 4 A5-5.0
G
4 151�5 .. --WF B 8
CS) f
WG A %\ cooN R1
k/ 7\ (A CF==145-0 WF BS9��
q SCAI-EQ Lo WF B2
'51.5 A
URE -7
GF==l NON- CITY OF SALEM
HY-0. 50' -22 - - JURISDICTIONAL P A
WF B3 ISOLATED G ARD
V
WETLAND
WF B7
V.- (0.08 kCRE-FT)
14 WF B4
A> '%b
WF WF B6 -------- -
-77
PROP.
2
135 J
_7
/IV 4'W TRAJL 6#400
PROPOSED STON -7
It (TYP)
CHECK DAMS 50'± O.C. (TYP)
000 115 OPEN"SPACE-2 N
3�1 EL.��:S�
SU RYA & ie, .
IIVF- 14 4
TP -�-2 E 6'± 1 *,� --A
rRA 7-/O/V ESHGIhT 0 10,
+
ISABELLE WIRYO ol
06-0015 &,AjkFUSAL 0 1
PROP.' --------
13
------ -----
4-'W-ITRAIL 0- 4
1136
TYPI
---- -- ------- cly
W
FOR SIDES-AND BOTTOM OF ITHE BASIN,,USE-A MIXTU E F A13 �0/
WF A2
OF-VITHSTANDING-PERIO IC LAJ
OF GRASS SEEDS CAPABLE -----------
INUNDATION UNDER WATER,--AND DROUGHT T 0
WF A3 N,, WF A14
-DURING SUMMER-'-(TYP) F Al2
WF C6 W
10-, t --------------------
12
WF,A,-�F A WF C5
NO)N- WFC7 LAJ
WF Al 0 0-
JURISDIICTIONAX WF C8 0
WF A4 WF A51 WF Al 5. ISOLATED -----------------------
WEM-AND
VF C4 \(0.09 AkCRE-FT)
NTROL
PROPOSED LIMIT OF EROSION CO
V.W.
25' MIN. OFF OF EDGE OF B. WF C1 DATE:
WF A6; ----- -
WF A9 WF C3
- 106, WF WF C2
Al
V'' z
4 "
WF A7 WF Al 7�
WF A8
WF A18'/
EDGE -OF BORDERING
VEGETATED.WETLANDS
1110.........
WF A19
---------- 121-
X�0
WF A
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
.-JAMES E. CONNICK.
06-0005
MONITORING WELL
WF A21
FIRE HYDRANT
2
WATER GATE El - ' DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) WF A21 7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
WF A22* 6 Land Court 6/1/2016
UTILITY POLE COL) OPEN S 5 Remove Future Parking Area 1/29/2016
2
4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016
LIGHT POLE
12
WF A23 1, Peer review comments /07/2015
x
WF A24
--LYNN_,SAND & STONE Testpits; Infiltration Basin designation
11/10/2015
DRAIN MANHOLE @
-E I Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015
--C/O-.,AGGR -GATE INDUSTRIES
SEWER MANHOLE WF A25' 0 6-�001 2 ISION
NO. REV DATE
7
WF A26*
CONC CONCRETE TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
"THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION
SBDH STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE WF A27 7()�j 7 70
FND FOUND
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
WCR WHEEL CHAIR RAMP WF A28
OWNER:
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY WF A29 WF A33
WF A30 BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
WF A31 WF A32
00 18 WALLACE ROAD
IROD IRON ROD WF A34'
03 LYNN, MA 01901
WF A35 0 LC,CERTS 36055,36056,36057
TREE -110 . WILLIAMS
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL WF A36� A00LICANT:
CLIERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
EXISTING CONTOUR ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY f ra r)LSD REALTY TRUST
(R1) CLUSTER DATE: ---- --- --------- 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPAFAGES
(R1) (1) WF A37 04GINEM I PLANNIMS I SURMOPS
LYNN, MA 01905 189 NORTH MAIN STREET
PROPOSED CONTOUR
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO SUITE 101
EP MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 100 FT 150 FT (OONE) WF A38 SEAL PROJECT LOCUS: MIDDLETON,MA 01949
E) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
EDGE OF PAVEMENT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NON CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE:(978)539-8088
t FAX:(978)539-8200
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS
VGC WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM
VERTICAL GRANITE CURB MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F. (NONE) OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THETWENTY R:'�;L ASSESSORS REFERENCE:
LOT COVIERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% S
W IU!ItA*MM, MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT
PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES 0' 20' 40' 80'
MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 2 OF 2
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 10 FT -----------------------------
(�i� 30 FT 30 FT CITY CLERK SCALE: 1"=40'
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT AUGUST14, 2015 SHEET 7 OF 11
is,05 r
A
NOTE:
CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK TO BE USED ONLY WHERE IT
BRICK SHELF WALL OF MANHOLE WILL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED EARTH.
I I . USE RESTRAINED JOINT FITTINGS (MEGALUG OR PUMPER CONNECTI,
SLOPE 1"/FT. VERTICAL GRANITE FINISH GRADE',
v p, CURB, TYPE VB VMATERIAL VARIES APPROVED EQUAL) WHERE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS FACES ROAD
BINDER COURSE UNACCEPTABLE.
vv
SIZE OF BLOCK OR MEGALUG TO BE DESIGNED FOR 1.5
B v -FLOW TOP COURSE TIMES NORMAL OPERATING PRESSURE.
V . t Z=%sg�
6)v 0 ocDoo
7 VARIES po�P.(=5 FINISHED STREET GRADE EDGESTONE
BASE COURSE 6" 6"
P, MIN. MIN.
CRUSHED STONE POURED CEMENT
PI :)E v PIPE up CONCRETE SADDLE SALEM STANDARD
V. P, 0 01 VALVE BOX AND COVER
, -0
v jo.§0 0 boo on 0 ACCEPTABLE UNDER
:)0.00 00 0 - 080880�__ SECTION M4 OF THE
),bc�P GRAVEL 0 12 MIN. ACCESSTUBE
0
A�k 91 massDOT STANDARD
0 1
BRICKS ON 0 0 SPECIFICTIONS
EDGE (2X8 EXPOSED) C) 0 0
LL_
BRICK CHANNEL APPLIES MASONRY RING
TO DROP CONNECTIONS AS G RAN ITE ' CURB D ETAI L CONCRETE 8 C.L.D.1.
WELL AS CONVENTIONAL. (NOT TO SCALE) THRUST BLOCK WATER MAIN
A
6" GAIFE VALVE 6" C.L.D.1
WATER MAI
PLAN ..v
—-—-—-—-—--
-SHELF ELE-)/ATION SAME AS
SLOPE 1"/FT. CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE. ANCHORING TEE
MECHANICAL JOINTS PROVIDE 12" SQUARE BY 6—INCH
IT WALL OF MANHOLE CONCRETE BASE UNDER HYDRANT
1&�
BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL.—, 6" HIGH CHECK DAM WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN TYPICA1
CONNE(
8" MINIMUM OR LOI
12"
7 1-2" CRUSHED)`—'
S41 6* -
u G
12" MINIMUM SCREENED
STONE
GRAVEL BASE. <
Mr
BRICK ON EDGE
UNDISTURBED EARTH
VARIIES (SEE PLAN)
SECTION A—A
CONCRETE COLLAR GRASSED SWALE
MANHOLE FRAME AND qW ('NCT Td SCALE)
COVER AS SPECIFIED EXISTING GROUND SURFACE OR
FINISHED GRADE
BRICK FOR GRADE
ADJUSTMENT
PRECAST TRANSITION SECTION
OR BARREL SECTION WITH
x
< PRECAST TOP SLAB f
00 BLEND
TOP WIDTH 6'-0" MIN. BLEND
CONTACT CONTACT
RUBBER "O"—RING GASKET AREA AREA BITUMINOUS CONIC. TOP
v v OR PREFORMED FLEXIBLE REMOVE
4'-0" UNLESS OTHERWISE— JOINT SEALANT AS SPECIFIED T(OP & SUBSOIL COURSE AS SPECIFIED
INDICATED ON DRAWINGS BIT. CONIC. BINDER
COURSE AS SPECIFIED
010 GRAVEL BASE AS SPECIFIED
MANHOLE RUNGS MULTIPLES OF 1',2',3',4',5', 12" MIN.
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
8" MINIMUM v c. OR 6' LENGTHS AS REQUIRED
EXISTING
V SEE PIPE CONNECTION
SHELF ELEVATION SAME AS SUBGRADE
DETAILS THIS 8HEET
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE.
vp
8" MINIMUM MIN.
—12" THICK MIN. LAYER
OF 6"-8" DIAM. STONES
RIP RAP CHANNEL PAVEMENT MAT,
v v 1V V.,
v v . P 9. (NOT TO SCALE) D ETAI L
12" MINIMUM (NOT TO SCALE)
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM SLAB SCREENED GRAVEL
SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN ry)O
THE MANHOLE BARREL
SECTION WALL OR TOP SLAB BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL.
WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
UNDISTURBED EARTH SECTION B—B 2 1"x2"x3' WOODEN STAKE
(5, O.C.)
PRECAST SEWER MANIHOLE
50—FT LONG
0 00,00,060,0,00,000,00,60,0,000,0,00
D ETAI L STRAWWATTLE 00000000000000000000000000 w
(NOT TO SCALE) (12" MIN) 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000 0
000000000,00,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:
0000000000 000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
v GROUND 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 000000000000000000000
SURFACE 00000000000000000000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 ono��0000000000000000
on el nonononon n n n
A USE CRUSHED STONE-' PLAN VIEW
GREATER THAN 3—INCHES
BUT SMALLER THAN
c> z
6—INCHES
1-2" CRUSHED
0 0 �0�0�0
STONE 0 0 00 0 0 0�foh�_07oo��0000,, 12"
FLOW 6" MIN. EXISTING ---- -0
GRADE SE&ION VIEW
STAKED STRAW WATTLE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
STONE CHECK DAM D ETAI L D ETAI L
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE)
TREE PLANTINGS WHERE FINAL STREET LIGHT
SHOWN ON PLAN LOCATIONS MAY BE MODIFIED
BASED ON FINAL DESIGN BY ..................
UTILITY COMPANY AND/OR
SALEM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
TYPICAL H20 INSPECTION PORT DETAIL
PAVEMENT
40' LAYOUT ......
6" lli:: .............. .I'll
FLOOR BOX FRAME AND LID
6"SCH. 40 PVC OR
24' PAVEMENT NEENAH R-7506 OR EQUAL
3�5 SDR-35 PVC PIPE
4
...........
GR613S CONC. W1 S.S. CAP SCREW LID
. ..... ... RISER
24" SQ
. ................ ......
I T, P� SIDE- CLOSURE
. ...............
............
T UARE
f�il WALK
. ......................
....... ......
PAVEMENT
..............
. . . .................. CLASS "C" CONCRET
...................
10"
............. -BASE
PAVEMENT SUB
. ...........
..........
95%COMPACTED FILL
VERTICAL GRANITE HVLV FC-24 95%COMPACTED FILL
3/8" CURBING 3/8" FEED CONNECTOR
FOOT
FOOT 4, ---------------
FOOT 3/8"' FOOT-----: 4 OZ. NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
3/8:'' 7
AROUND STONE. TOP AND SIDES z
6"MIN DEPTH 0
MANDATORY; BOTTOM PER ENGINEER'S
------------ 0 OF 1-2 INCH U < >
U) C 0 DESIGN PREFERENCE. LJ:2 Uj
WASHED CRUSHED
cr- f
E MISO. 0
:2 > bi STONE ABOVE
6" LOAM 0 0 M > CONDUITS I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
GAS 0 AND BELOW UJI
SEED -Ln 0 -
U CULTEC NO. 20L POLYETHYLENE WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
(DEPENDING ON CHAMBERS
12" DRAIN SIDEWALK ON LINER ABOVE STONE BASE AND
AVAILABILITY) Uj
BOTH SIDES BENEATH RECHARGER 330XL HD PREPARING THIS PLAN.
HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER SIDE
TYPE 1-1 0 8" DIAM. PVC 4" WIRE MESHED
BITUMINOUS GRAVITY SEWER REINFORCED PORTALS WHERE UTILIZING 1 2 IN. DIA. WASHED, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8" DIAM. H,
INTERNAL MANIFOLD CRUSHED STONE — — — — — — ------------
CONCRETE CONCRETE
- C.L.D.I. WATER PIPE PER CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD SURROUNDING CHAMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
1 1/2" TOP MIX 8" GRAVEL BASE i I
ENGINEER DESIGN HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER AND INSPECTION PORT
2 1/2" BINDER (MAX. INLET= ASSEMBLY FROM 0 0 01 .0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0
12" GRAVEL BASE 24 INCHES) 1-2 INCH WASHED CRUSHED BOTTOM TO FINAL ELEVATION
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION U_ C-111 M�
STONE BENEATH AND
(NOT TO SCALE) AROUND CHAMBER BED (THIS CHAMBER ONLY)
TYPICAL CULTEC CHAMBER
A B INSPECTION Pr)PT 6" INTERNAL COUPLING
CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY PLAN VIEW
101-Olp
--------7-117---------------i-r--------
NOTE: THE CULTEC MODEL SHOWN HERE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE
EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
V-0" 6'-0-
1 -2 INCH IDIA. WASHED, PAVEMENT CULTEC NO.20L POLYETHYLENE LINER TO
CRUSHEDSTONE BE PLACED BENEATH
24" DIA 95% 4 OZ. NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC HVLV FC-24 FEED CONNECTORS 4 OZ NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
CI-EANOUT CO\ERj CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD COMPACTED FILL AROUND STONE WHEN UTILIZING 95%COMPACTED FILL ARCI'UND STONE. TOP AND SIDES
7
WASHED MANDATORY.
(3 PLACES) HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER -10.0"[254 mm]MIN. INTERNAL MANIFOLD FINISHED V-2 INCH DIA
L---- ---------------J-1-------- CRUSHED
-------- RECHARGER 3,30 XL HD GRADE
WHERE SPECIFIED
PLAN VIEW
HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER
10.0"[254 mm]MIN.
6.0"[152 mm]MIN.
A 16.0"[406 mm]
1K
MIN. . . . . . . . . . . .
12'[3658 mm]
EXTEND ACCESS COVERS TO FINISH GRADE - - - 30.5"[775 mm] 6.0"[152 mm]MIN.
MAX.
N�71 D o e
n * *
H -I n 16.0"[406 mm]j
7" 1<6 H
MIN.
mm
PIPE PER 2'[3658 mm] 30.5"[775 mm]
8" KNOCKOUT r (Typ)
Irl
8" KNOCKOUT �111\<\111<\1111r\1111r\/11<
(TYP) ENGINEER DESIGN MAX. NIN
(MAX. INLET=
36" X 12" CULTEC NO. 20L POLYETHYLENE SIDE PORTAL TO BE CUT 2.0"[305 mm]
OPENING 24 INCHES) LINER TO SPAN THE ENTIRE WIDTH IN FIELD TO ALLOW HVLV (TYP.)
A F THE SYSTEM BELOW THE HVLV FC-24 FEED CONNECTOR
0 .0"[152 mm]MIN.
AS NEEDED
4'-8" FC-24 FEED CONNECTORS AND D
.4 00\>�\>� 1 1
36" X 24" 4'-5
3'-0" SIDE PORTALS N
OPENING
0
6"
6"
12.0"[305 mm]'TYP.- 58.0"[1473 mm] 52.0" [1321 mm]
SEC.TION VIEW CULTEC INTERNAL MANIFOLD DETAIL
GENERALNOTES ALL RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY UNITS ARE MARKED
NOTES: RECHARGER 330XL HD BY CULTEC,INC.OF BROOKFIELD,CT. VOTH A COLOR STRIPE FORMED INTO THE PART ALONG THE
STORAGE PROVIDED=11.32 CF/FT PER DESIGN UNIT.
1. CONCRETE: 5,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. REFER TO CULTEC,INC.'S CURRENT RECOMMENDED LENGTH OF THE CHAMBER.
ALL RECHARGER 330XL HD CHAMBERS MUST BE INSTALLED IN
2. DESIGNED FOR H-20 LOADING. ALSO AVAILABLE IN H-10 LOADING WITH 3' WALL. INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. ACCORDANCE V41TH ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL,STATE AND
USE RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY FOR TRAFFIC AND/OR FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
3. TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. H-25 APPLICATIONS.
SEDIMENT AND OIL SEPARATOR CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD1 HEAVY DUTY TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
TOP OF 1 .5:1
D ETAI L MAX. SLOPE =2:1 SLOPE CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
(NOT TO SCALE) DATE:
CITY OF SALEM
FLAT STONES
ARD CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO
FOR WALL LIKE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
UNPAVED PAVED CONFIGURATION
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS
FINISHED GRADE
PRUNE AS FIELD OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY
DIRECTED BY OWNER TO DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
IMPROVE APPEARANCE
(RETAIN NORMAL TREE EXISTING GROUND
SHAPE) SURFACE ......
1.5 --------------------------
CITY CLERK
MAX. SLOPE
7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
TRUNK FLARE 6 No changes to this sheet
1*`N"PAVING AND SUB-BASE MATERIAL
6/1/2016
JUNCTION: PLANT TREE
FILTER
COMMON FILL MATERIA 5 No changes to this sheet
1-2" ABOVE EXISTING 1/29/2016
FABRIC 4 Planning Boa
GRADE
rd comments 1/22/2016
COMMON FILL MATERIAL
3" LAYER SHREDDED PINE JOINTS 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015
PERPENDICULAR
2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015
BARK MULCH TO TO
TO SLOPE I Details 9/4/2015
OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER WARNING TAPE
DATE
KEEP MULCH 2" FROM NO. REVISION
TRUNK
MIN. BOULDER DETAIL SHEET
EXISTING GRADE ORIGINAL
SIZE 500LB
GROUND OR --------------- ------
CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION
COMPACTED
FROM TOP 113 OF 3/4"
FILL
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
ROOT BALL. IF 1 1/2 PROPOSED
12" MINIMUM SEE -------------
NONBIODEGfRADABLE, 8" MIN CLEARANCE GRADE
NOTE1 BELOW
...:!--CRUSH ED�- ,OWNER:
IN SCREENED GRAVEL
REMOVE COMPLETELY.
STONE
SCREENED GRAVEL PLACED AGAINST BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
I FEI FEI I lEi I E SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE -------- ------------
=-I I 1�_=_i I M I M I 1—=
SEWER OR DRAIN UNDISTURBED SIDES AND BOTTOM OF 18 WALLACE ROAD
El I F-1 I FE1 I F�]I F�d I 1�
BACKFILL AS PER TRENCH. SEE NOTE 1 LYNN, MA 01901
LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
SPECIFICATION 12" MIN SCREENED GRAVEL BEDDING--�
8" MIN SCREENED GRAVEL BEDDING DATE: 41111 AF x
12" MINIMUM
BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE. BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE. -1
WILLIAMS
DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW APPLICANT: A 7
LEDGE UNDISTURBED NSD REALTY TRUST
ROOTBALL.
THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL
EARTH 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPARAGES
NOTES IMINEW I KAININM I SURMOItS
LYNN, MA 01905 1 891,01,1 H MAIN STREET
1. FOR PIPES OTHER THAN PVC, SELECTED COMMON FILL MAY BE USED FROM 4" PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN 75% OF BASE PROJECT LOCUS:. SUITE 101
SEAL MIDDLETON,MA 0 1949
TO DISCHARGE TO
MID-DIAMETER OF PIPE TO 12" ABOVE TOP OF PIPE "DAYLIGHT" AT ROCKS TO BE W CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE--(978)539-8088
DECIDUOUS TREE INTERVALS NO GREATER THAN 30' 1000 LBS OR ASSESSORS REFERENCE: FAX:(978)539-8200
1 (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) GREATER MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 S WW.WSENGINEERS.COM
PLANTING TRENCH DETAIL FOR
D ETAI L GRAVITY PIPE DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 4
4A SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE)
RIP- RAP D ETAI L
(NOT TO SCA`LE) SHEET 9 OF I I
I I AUGUST 14, 2015
6T
5 0 0
0 0
0
cr M 1 SOiT
6" A
LO M CONDU S
SEED
FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FINISHED GRADE FRAME & GRATE FINISHED GRADE FRAME & GRATE
OR FINISHED GRADE
MANHOLE FRAME AND MORTAR MORTAR
COVER AS SPECIFIED BRICKS AND MORTAR
4 MIN. TYP GRADE ADJUSTMENTS
TO BE USED TO MAKE
--------------- ---
MIN. 8" FLAT TOP �4" X 20" OPENING; SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE
CONCRETE COLLAR— ... . GRADE ADJUSTMENTS
WEEPHOLE TO BE 12-INCH COVERS TO
4 --PRECAST IN RISER SUPPORT AN H-20 LOAD
BRICK FOR GRADE C�v
_7p SECTION
COMMON FILL MATERIAL 6" OVERLAP ADJUSTMENT \ -1�L-
V P. -L— PRECAST TRANSITION
V SECT OR BARREL 6 CONICAL SECTION`�' . WEEPHOLE TO BE
X 48" ±1" DIAMETER
SECT WITH PRECAST PRECAST IN RISER
RISER SECTION
C. V1> TOP SLAB SECTION
0 0 4
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC RUBBER "0" RING
C>.
V V NORMAL A 4..
2' FORMED FLEXIBLE OUTSIDE OF PIPE
9� JOINT SEALANT WATER +2" CLEARANCE RISER SECTION------
LEVEL 7—
(TYP) GASKETOR PRE-
3/8" TO 3/4" >V
WASHED GRAVEL`_�
MANHOLE RUNGS CATCH BASIN TRAP A
NORMAL
MULTIPLES OF 4 V) WATER OUTSIDE OF PIPE
BASE SECTION LEVEL +2" CLEARANCE
1,2,3,4,5 OR 6 TT
J// LENGTHS AS REQ'D
4" PERF. CORR. HDPE 3 4'-0" UNLESS OTHERWISE
(HOLES FACING UP) -
INDICATED ON DRAWINGS CATCH BASIN TRAP
BASE SECTIO
V.
WOO
UNDISTURBED EARTH
12"MINIMUM
FOUNDATION SCREENED GRAVEL
UNDISTURBED EARTH '4
UNDERDRAIN A
V
D ETAI L D. 9� j V P D. V 0 00 0
C"o 12" MINIMUM SCREENED GRAVEL PRECAST DOUBLE—GRATE CATCH BASIN 12"MINIMUM H:RA
(NOT TO SCALE) 0 0 SCREENED GRAVEL UNDISTURBED EARTH
D ETAI L =:J I I I LA I I Ef
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM SLAB 3" MINIMUM CONCRETE FILL (NOT TO SCALE)
SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN DOUBLE GRATE
THE MANHOLE BARREL R ECAST CATC H BAS I N
SECTION WALL OR TOP .SLAB
4'-0" WIDE WHICHEVER IS GREATER UNDISTURBED EARTH D ETAI L
MULCHED TRAIL FRAME (NOT TO SCALE)
SINGLE GRATE
EXISTING GRADE
LIFTING STRAPS
PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE GRATE
UNDISTURBED
D ETAI L
EARTH
(NOT TO SCALE)
TRAIL DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE) "DANDY SACK" CITY OF SALEM
IL I I I I INSTALLED BETWEEN OARD
THE GRATE AND FRAME
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
PREPARING THIS PLAN.
PLAN
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN ------
SECTION WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
A-A DATE: ------- GRATE LIFTING STRAP 04
6' -0" -an SECTION CATCH BASIN GRATE
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO A-A FRAME PLACED ABOVE THE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY LOWER STRAPS AND
6' -0"
2 -0 2'.-0' 2'-0" THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS BELOW THE LIFTING
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY 4'.-0- STRAPS.
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING [OF SAID NOTICE.
Z<�� 1 4 LOWER STRAP
CITY CLERK 4" 11 . . . V ---------------
"DANIDY SACK"
OPEN THROAT GRANITE SEDIMENT TRAP OR ----------------- -----
CURB INLET SECTION OPEN THROAT GRANITE EQUAL
CURB INLET SECTION
------------
ELEVATION
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP DATE: --- _W-------
PRECAST ID ETAI L
CATCH PRECAST
BASIN CATCH Notes: (N(OT TO SCALE) 7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
SECTION
BASIN 1) To be placed in the existing catch basins located in Clarke Avenue prior to the start of construction. 6 No changes to this sheet 6/11/20116
A-A OPEN THROAT GRANITE SECTION 2) To be placed in the proposed catich basins as sho-wn immediately after installation to prevent sediment 5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016
PLAN CURB INLET SECTION A-A from reaching the stormwater managiement areas. 4 Planning Board comments . 1/22/2016
3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015
3 FLANGE CATCH BASIN FRAME PLAN 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015
41 . . . . . . . . . . . . AND CASCADE GRATE LEBARON I Details 9/4/2015
. . . . . . . LK1200 OR APPOROVED EQUAL OPEN THROAT GRANITE NO. REVISION DATE
LOW POINTS USE LF248-2)
. .. ... ... CURB INLET SECTION
CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATE SHALL BE MODEL DETAIL SHEET
BRICKS AND MORTAR 44" ',�LV-2448-2 FRAME WITH LK1200 GRATES ON SLOPES "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVSION
AND LF248-2 GRATES @ LOW POINTS BY LEBARON
4 'd TO BE USED TO MAKE
GRADE ADJUSTMENTS 41 FOUNDRY, INC. OF BROCKTON, MA OR EQUAL.
28" -9 (SET AT BINDER COURSE AND RESET AT 1"
FRAME & GRATE BRICKS AND MO�TAR L 18" SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
24" 1XX BELOW FINISH PAVEMENT)
A _j TO BE UISED TO MAKE . . . . . .
A I
GRADE ADJUSTMENTS OWNER:
----- BRICKS AND MORTAR BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
TO BE USED TO MAKE 18 WALLACE ROAD
48" ±1" DIAMETER 48" ±1" DIAMETER 48" ±1" DIAMETER 22" GRADEADJUSTMENTS
LYNN, MA 01901
FRAME & GRATE— BRICKS AND MORTAR LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
PRECAST PRECAST PRECAST TO BEOSED TO MAKE PRECAST WILLIAMS
APPLICANT:
CATCH f3ASIN CATCH BASIN GRADEADJUSTMENTS CATCH BASIN
CATCH BASIN NSD REALTY TRUST &
48" 1 DIAMETER 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPARAGES
ENGINEM I RMNERS I SURMORS
LYNN, MA 01905
189 NORTH MAIN STREET
SUITE 101
ELEVATION SECTION ELEVATION SECTION SPAI PROJECT LOCUS:
MIDDLETON,MA 01949
A-A CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA
A-A PHONE:(978)539-8088
-8200
FAX:(978)539
i6SSESSORS REFERENCE: WWW.WSENGINEEPS.COM
MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 S
GRANITE CURB INLET DOUBLE—GRATE CB GRANITE CURB INLET 7
cm"
ft&1 99 DETAIL SHEET 3 OF 4
D ETAI L' D ETAI L SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE)
SINGLE GRATE DOUBLE GRATE AUGUST 14, 2015 SHEET 10OF 11
—6-r
jp
0
'RA
VEL
DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS
BRICKS AND MORTAR RIMS=142.50 SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE BRICKS AND MORTAR RIMS=132.83 SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE BRICKS AND MORTAR RIMS=118.83 SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE BRICKS AND MORTAR RIMS=122.83 SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE
TO BE USED TO MAKE 6-INCH FLAT TOP TO BE USED TO MAKE 6-INCH FLATTOP USED TO MAK 6-INCH FLAT TOP TO BE USED TOMAKE 6-INCH FLAT TOP
GRADE ADJUSTMENTS COVERS TO SUPPORT AN GRADE ADJUSTMENTS COVERS TO SUPPORT AN GRADE ADJUSTMENTS COVERS TO SUPPORT AN GRADE ADJUSTMENTS
-11 i 2� COVERS TO SUPPORT AN
-20 LOAD —H-20 LOAD
H-20 LOAD H -20 LOAD
H
SET TOP OF BAFFLE AT SET TOP OF BAFFLE AT SET TOP OF BAFFLE AT —SET TOP OF BAFFLE AT
ELEV.=135.50 4" ELEV.=131.20 ELEV.=117.35 ELEV.=121.30
100 YR STORM 100 YR STORM
-----_SET 21 WEIR @ 1 OOYR PERF. 8" @ 120.50 ----__SET 21 WEIR @ 1 OOYR
10" 0 134.5 . - -a PVC k
STORM ELEV.=135.34 STORM ELEV.=121.06
8" 0 134.00 c=; TEE
18* HDPE 18" HDPIf 18" HDPE 18"
jDPE
INLET PIPE INLET PIPE INLET PIPE INLET-PIPE
INV=132.75 INV=128.50 INV=115.50 b
b O� INV=118.00
S=LEVEL 4" 0 132.75 S=LEVEL 2.5" 0 128.5 S=LEVEL S=LEVEL co
8" @ 115.5 6 0 118.0
PRE-CAST CONCRETE PRE-CAST CONCRETE PRE-CAST CONICRETE PRE-CAST CONCRETE
INFILTRATION 13101SIN 1 TRAP ROCK INFILTRATION BASIN 2 TRAP ROCK INFILTRATION BASIN 3 TRAP ROCK INFILTRAT10N BASIN 4 TRAP ROCK
--7—PANEL WITH ORIFICE -----PANEL WITH ORIFICE �—PANEL WITH ORIFICE �—PANEL WITH ORIFICE
72' 1" -------r- 72' ±1'
72" ±1* 72* ±1"
DIAMETER 12" HDPE DIAMETER 12" HDPE DIAMETER 01,IU2 IDPE DIAMETER 12" HDPE
T
OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE �P PIPE OUTLET PIPE
INV=131.50
INV=127.50 INV=113.50 INV=1 14.50
0 —OUTSIDE OF PIPE o —OUTSIDE OF PIPE 0o OUTSIDE OF PIPE 0 00 0 OUTSIDE OF PIPE
12"MINIMUM +2" CLEARANCE 12"MINIMUM +2" CLEARANCE 12"MINIMUM +2" CLEARANCE 12"MINIMUM +2" CLEARANCE
SCREENED GRAVEL SCREENED GRAVEL f SCREENED GRAVEL SCREENED GRAVEL UNDISTURBED EARTH
UNDISTURBED EARTH UNDISTURBED EARTH UNDISTURBED EARTH d
SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION-
(2) DRAIN (2) DRAIN (2) DRAIN (2) DRAIN
MANHOLE COVERS jjjoj���,... MANHOLE COVERS MANHOLE COVERS MANHOLE COVERS
0--
'000
00
de
INLET OUTLET OUTLET INLET OUTLIE OUTLE T
PIPE D R A I N PIPE D R A I N D R A I N PIP'E PIPE D R A I N D R A I N PIPE D R A I N
PRECAST CATCH BASIN PRECAST CATCH BASIN PRECAST CATCH BASIN PRECAST CATICH BASIN
PLAN PLAN PLAN- PLAN
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
INFILTRATION BASIN 1 INFILTRATION BASIN 2 INFILTRATION BASIN 3 INFILTRATION BASIN 4-
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE)
4
CITY OF S E
DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL Post Top Lufminaire
P G ARD
D ETAI L
(NOT TO SCALE) /—DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL
NOTES
BIT. SIDEWALK—� USABLE SIDEWALK WIDTH PER AAB IS NOT TO BE 1. Refer to STD CS-6109 for Material List.
GRAVEL--\ LESS 'THAN 4'-0" 2. C-1-C to be installed inside the 3" PVC conduit
G__ I ROADWAY and cutoff 81 the t-op of the concrete base as
LOAM & SEED NOTE: SIQ44� shown. C-11-C ends shallba cutwith care to
I- I F F OUNUA I IUN I
Z.-I, DETECTABLE WARNING PANELS ARE REQUIRED avolid damage to their factorV installecl conductors
7_1- inside,and to allow sufficient length to properly 04
ON ALL 'PROPOSED WHEELCHAIR RAMPS TO BE
cL to f4xture leads at the polB handhoie located
conine
INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION recast base, or inside a secondary
180 above the P
STANDARD M/E 107.6.5R (DECEMBER 2004) TYPICAL INSTALLATION andhole or transformer foundation.
3/8" DIA. HOLE 1/2"
DEEP AT ACTUAL -
POINT OF SURVEY PANELS MAY BE CONCRETE PRECAST OR
(a (0 9 , v t
CAST IN PLACE OR OTHER SUITABLE 1.,1.15"-2.1� ------ ----- . . ......
MATERIAL PERMANENTLY APPLIED TO THE (.0 - C?
REFERENCE z ;�
C5
RAMP. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES
E 4 1, .
SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJACENT -------------
50% TO 60%
WALKING SURFACES EITHER LIGHT-ON-DARK, OF BASE DIA. ]0.2"
OR DARK-ON-LIGHT A C14 A
MIN.
--------------------- --
16
L_N�0.9"-1.4"
L
-------------- ------- -
SECTION A-A
Pole Base
DATE: ---
LAYOUT Securing Nuts
Handhole
LINE And Washers ,
7 Land Court Comments 8/23/2016
Anchor Bolt Shroticf 6 No changes to this sheet 6/11/2016
Pole Base Leveling N-uts 5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016
20 W And Washers 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016
3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015
GRANITE BOUND SIDEWALK VARIABLE VARIABLE 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015
7.57,* MAX �X 3#0
7.�7�oM A __fo I Details 9/4/2015
D ETAI L Fin. Grade NO. REVISION DA11
(NOT TO SCALE) "LEVEL LANDING"
1 .5%* CROSS SLOPE (gWarning Tape
GRASS PLOT —2_
TOWARD STREET FOR "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVSION
Q> DRAINAGE
0
MEET PROPOSED RAMP 40 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
GRADE AT END OF CURB 40 - 2" O.D. Cable-tn-Conduit-Note 2
0 0 GRASS PLOT OWNER:
0 0000
0 0 0 00000 1 C14 VAR
00 0 0 0 BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
-0 0 Washed, Screened Sand
18 WALLACE ROAD
C Above And Below
GRANITE CURB Cable-In-Conduit
LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057
6" REVEAL 3" PVC
NSD REALTY TRUST
6" REVEAL AT END APPLICANT: WILLIAMS
Clean Fill
PLAIN CEMENT CONCRETE 5'-0" MIN. RAMP 24" "LEVEL LANDING" WITH 76 OAKVILLE STREET SPAFAGES
REFERENCE LYNN, MA 01905 ENaNEERS I PLANNERS I SURMORS
DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL 189 NORTH MAIN STREET
POINT 1 .5% * SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE SEAL PROJECT LOCUS: SUITE 101
MIDDLETON,MA 0 1949
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED Undii=rbed Solid Earth LARK AVENUE SALEM, MA PHONE:(978)539-8088
FAX:(978)539-8200
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
.ASSESSORS REFERENCE: WWW.WSENCINEERS.COM'
WHEELCHAIR RAMP (WCR) S
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN ok MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9
-A
P ARI S PLAN.
D ETAI L LIGHT POLE DETAIL
NOTES: DETAIL SHEET 4 OF 4
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE ±0.5% V
WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC AUGUST 14, 2015 __j SHEET I I OF I I
-S
E
S
77--10' 10 134.5 S
PERF.
- �X�
7,7!r
1 8 1 1 1 " " I 1 -1
INLET N T
INV=j IN L�l
I V
S=Lj S�Ll
t)TRAI
SIN 1 AP RC SIN 2_�V SI N 3 TRAP R C
'R
A�rL
,RAVEL NEW-___ RAVEL RAVE
INLET ET INLET
D R A I N PIPE 17"E PIPE D R A IN
rill
::1ac\�c <}verv � Sv4,�\�v�5\or� —
�-e o�\ h\ o-\�ce, t �_:\��,cq �=e_P Rec�:p'rs
�l �O�M-L
'J
1
I
1/4/116 2:59 PM
CITY OF SALEM
'Piv
I 001mwn) PLANNING BOARD
PROJECT EXTENSION REQUEST
December,51, 2015
(Date)
NSD Realty Trust respectfully request that the Salem Planning Board
(Applicant/Attomey)
Clark Avenue and
extend the deadline for action on the project located at Clark Avenue Extension to
(Project Address)
February 26 , 2016
(Date)
Sincerely,
NSD Realty Trust
By its Attorney,.
<
F
S' tUV6-
roseph C. Correnti, Esquire >
90
Name
Request: VG NTED DENIED
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSM7S 01970 * PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740,0404 - WWW.SALEM.00M
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
7w arr 4n A in. IL
FILE
CITY CLERK, S117
LF�L t,!Ar 3
Site Visit
Clark Ave- Woodlands Cluster Subdivision
Although not a public hearing, you are hereby noticed that the Salem Planning Board will conduct a site
visit for:
Project: Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit and Ston-nwater
Management Permit application for the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26)
residential lots.
Location: Clark Avenue, Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9.
The site visit will begin at the undeveloped space between 13 and 21 Clark Ave.
Date: Saturday, January 9, 2016
Time: 12:30 p.m.
Applicant: NSD Realty TRUST
Ben Anderson
Chairman
Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law MG.L. c. 30A §18-25 and City Ordinance Sections 2-2028
through 2-2033.
This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board"
City Hall, Salem, Mass. on DEC 3 0 2015
at /0-'Z-O )0-1 in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A,
Sections 18-25.
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 WWW.SALEM,COM
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
Will hold a Public hearing for all
Persons interested in the applica-
tion of NSD REALTY TRUS a
Stormwater Management 1pfotrrlal
Permit in accordlanZ Sac 17 0 the
of 0 t�
Salem Code ldmanc�s ,afllw
for activity th;
,turbance gre
land within ti
proposed develop�nent is loc�tw
at Clark Avenue,Assessors Map 6,
Lots 7,8,and 9.
The public hearing will be held on
Thursday,October 15,2015 at 7:00
PM,in Room 313,Third Floor at 120
2ahshingiptin Street in accordance
Ch, er 40A of the Massachu-
setts General Laws
application and Pla�.A.reopyllio.'and
available for i
business houi
of Planning&
ment, ThllZd Floor, Izu Wasinington
Street,Salem,MA.
Ben Anderson,Chair
Planning Board
SIN-10/1,io/wm
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2015 Def 1 A 8, 38
FILE ff
CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS.
City of Salem
Planning Board
Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD R-EALTY TRUST
for a Stormwater Management Special Permit in accordance Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of
Ordinances to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance greater than one acre of land
within the City of Salem. The proposed development is located at Clark Avenue, Assessors Map
6, Lots 7, 8, and 9.
The public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 15,2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313,
Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts
General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during
normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor,
120 Washington Street, Salem, MA.
Ben Anderson, Chair
Planning Board
Salem News: 10/1/2015& 10/8/2015
This notice Posted on "Official Bulletin Board"
City Hall, Salem, Mass. o(IOCT o 1 2015
aq�?;iof\ in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A,
Sections 18-25.
120 W`611INGTOIN S I SALEM, �!ASSACHUSLFiS 01970 - Pf ION:: 978.6�9.5685 FAX 978.140.0404
CITY OF SALEM
V
PLANNING BOARD
City of Salem
Planning Board
Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST
for a Stormwater Management Special Permit in accordance Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of
Ordinances to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance equal greater than one acre of
land within the City of Salem. The proposed development is located at Clark Avenue,Assessors
Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9.
The public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 15,2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313,
Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts
General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during
normal business hours at the Department of Planning& Community Development, Third Floor,
120 Washington Street, Salem, MA.
Ben Anderson, Chair
Planning Board
Salem News Ads: October 1, 2015 & October 8, 2015
S'NEE� SALYM, XIASSACHUSETRS 01970 - PITONIH 9-78.6191.5685 1`.-�x 978.740.040z;
CITY OF SALEM
" PLANNING BOARD
City of Salem
Planning Board
Will hold a public healing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST
for a Stormwater Management Special Permit in accordance Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of
Ordinances to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance equal greater than one acre of
land within the City of Salem. The proposed development is located at Clark Avenue,Assessors
Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9. f
The public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 15,2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313,
Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts
General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during
normal business hours at the Department of Planning& Cormnunity Development, Third Floor,
120 Washington Street, Salem, MA.
Ben Anderson, Chair
Planning Board
Salem News Ads: October 1, 2015 & October 8, 2015
120W."SHINGFOIN STRE V� SALJ�..M, MASSACHUSEITS 01970 - PJIONT.-�' 978.6i9.5685 lv�x 978.740.0404 -
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
City of Salem
Planning Board
Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST
for a Stormwater Management Special Permit in accordance Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of
Ordinances to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance equal greater than one acre of
land within the City of Salem. The proposed development is located at Clark Avenue, Assessors
Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9.
The public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 15, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313,
Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts
General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during
normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor,
120 Washington Street, Salem, MA.
Ben Anderson, Chair
Planning Board
Salem News Ads: October 1, 2015 & October 8, 2015
120) SAIENI, MASSACHUSE-rrs 01970 - Pfio-,\!'� 97/8.6.9.5685 I'Ax 97&'/40.0404
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
Al 5 %2 -1
FILE #
City of Salem CITY CLERK� SALEM,MASS,
Planning Board
Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST for a
Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to
allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26)residential lots. The proposed development is
located at Clark Avenue, Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9.
The public hearing will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at
120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the
application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of
Planning& Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA.
Ben Anderson, Chair
Planning Board
Salem News: 9/3/2015 & 9/10/2015
This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board"
City.Hall, Salem, Mass. on SEP 0 3 2015
at 4' in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A,
Sections 18-25.
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM
MASSACHUSETTS
CITY OF SALEM,
120 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELE:978-745-9595 * FAx:978-740-9846
Kjmm_�RL�YDRISCOLL
MAYOR
Department of Planning and Community Development
MEMORANDUM
TO: Julia Medina
FROM: Erin Schaeffer, Staff Planner
DATE: 08/28/2015
RE: Planning Board Fees- Clark Avenue Subdivision
Hijulia,
Enclosed is a check to the amount of$1,950.00 for a Planning Board filing fee for a Cluster Residential
Special Perrnit for twenty-six (26) lots at$75.00 per dwelling unit.
B&M
'� �j
Erin Schaeffer
City of Salem Department of Planning &
E C;rE 1 V E D Community Development
AUG 2 1 Z015 CHECK RECEIPT AND TRACKING FORM
DEPT OF PLANNING
DAMMMUNT! BOARD ZMA STAFF
CLIENT:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
CONTACT NUMBER:
PURPOSEFOR
APPLICATION:
CHECK #
AMOUNT RECEIVED: $
Wn",i
r -4
E:�wnnk
Ba
A 02 10 28256�,j
11� �CON bo;k.ccm
;RIJCTION ' ,� IZEA rERN
Je Oa,W I I t : ' 1� -
Lynn MA ol gos 53-179/113
'PAY
8/2,5/2Q4
JO THE
1 f �� I I f
ORDER OF
and.Nine uh
)001
red Fift�and 00/100-;,.,"*.****
i U tY of Salem
DOLLARS
El
MEMO
11202825r,jim
_j0j ?9jB,: OS 905SOS2SIl.
City of Salem Department of Planning &
Community Development
RECEIVED—
AUG 2 12015 CHECK RECEIPT AND TRACKING FORM
DEPT.OF PLANNING&
DATE COMMU"7'�fJLA/7LOPM-NT BOARD PkanryIn 500orcl STAFF
CLIENT: t-15V
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
CONTACT NUMBER:
PURPOSEFOR
APPLICATION: 12 1-1)
CHECK # --7-9 2-c::; 7
AMOUNTRECEIVED: $ 5ZO 00
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
City of Salem
Planning Board
Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST for a
Stormwater Management Special Permit in accordance See. 37 of the Salem Code of Ordinances to allow for
activity that results in a land disturbance equal greater than one acre of land within the City of Salem. The
proposed development is located at Clark Avenue, Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9.
The public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 15, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120
Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the
application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of
Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA.
Ben Anderson, Chair
Planning Board
Legal Ad Publication Salem News: 10/1/2015 & 10/8/2015
Please Remit Bill To:
Serafini, Darling and Gorrenti,LLP
C/o Attorney Gorrenti, Esq.
63 Federal Street
Salern,Massachusetts 01970
Phone: (978) 744-0212
1Z) WASHINUFO.\� STRH-,;� S.ALEM, NfASSACHUSM'IS 01970 - 1)110N'� 97,S.(j1 9,56,85 i`AX9-&'740,0404 w\vv.s� I v.,'
I - i I J 1� "")
City of Salem Department of Planning &
Community Development
CHECK RECEIPT AND TRACKING FORM
Vc BOARD� STAFF (1
DATEO'
CLIENT:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
-:S,T(o r
CONTACT NUMBER:
PURPOSE FOR
APPLICATION:
CHECK #
AMOUNT RECEIVED:
28415
Entwin n
4 i-soo-EASTERN
)CONST�RUCTJON,, 53-179/113 19/242015'
7 '6aWjj4Str'e9-t,'Cyrin MA Di 06
PAY **520.601 ,
TO THE The Salem News
ORDFROF
DOLLARS
Five Hundred Twenty and
The Salern News
MEMO- AUTHOR11111 Sill
11111102841Som i:011301 ?q131: OS q0S50S2Sll2
ITHE SALEM NEWS
FEQUEET FORLBSAL NO110E
I understand that by signing this form, I am agreeing to the cost of the legal notice to be published in the
newspaper.
Payment is required at the time of the legal notice being received by the city and before it is published
in the newspaper.
Pease make checks payable to THESMEM NENS
The Salem News
Attn: Legal Notice
32 Dunham Fbad
Beverly, MA 01915
Prepaid cost required to run: $260
***Important:Average legal notice oostsare estimated; customer will either be refunded or billed after
the legal notice is published.
Check# 2"? if (attach check)
If payment is not received,the legal notice will be cancelled.
(Sgnature)
CITY OF SALEM
ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION OF ABUTTERS AND
"PARTIES IN INTEREST"
BOARD/COMMISSION: Planning Board
PROJECT SITE: Clark Ave. Map 6 Lots 7, 8 and 9
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT: Parties in Interest:
The applicant
Abutters
Owners of land opposite any street or way
Abutters within 300 feet
Planning boards of abutting cities and
towns
Assessor's Certification on Applications to the PLANNING BOARD for Site Plan Review,
Waivers of Frontage,Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permits,Wireless Communications
Special Permits,Cluster Development Special Permits,Planned Unit Development Special Permits,
and Business Park Development Special Permits.
This is to certify that the time of the last assessment for taxation made by the City of
Salem, the names and addresses of those listed on the attached sheets are "parties in
interesf' (as defined by Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A, Section 11) to the
parce](s) of land listed above as the project site.
Assessor's Signature: AO/V1 _ Date:
Number of initialed pages attached: 6�
Once Certified, Return to:
Department of Planning and Community Development
M plex"
i=Fire Soaden
I upo.'.Sue-
11 T—Ha
VF P,b5e Lob,ai,r
W�hool
Birm,
Citi Omir.d F.
A/
10 T.B.tedo,
Z
Hipo,,fte
MISS"Se"
US Hig�
ftMrhoerrifteedft�e
Abielir,T.Lel,eis
Muerill'oerm-Noil-abi,.
Barreiro,
W.,40-51
=&loft
IIIII 20�30 ft
S W.70ft
=70,ft
See.
4
10
4A
Se
1000 2000 ft Printed on 08131r2015 at09.09AM
Parcel ID: 03-0049-0 Parcel ID:03-0123-0 Parcel ID:03-0115-0
BROOKS ANTHONY T SEWALL MARLENE M DAMATO LILIANA
7 CLARK AVE SEWALL GARY M 9 CLARK AVENUE
SALEM, MA 01970 8 CLARK STREET SALEM, MA 01970
SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID: 03-0075-0 Parcel ID:03-0080-0 Parcel ID: 03-0129-0
FERRAGAMO PAUL SALEM CITY OF FIORE FAMILY NOM
20 WEBSTER STREET WEGRZYN DANA A
PEABODY, MA 0 1960 59A MIDDLE ROAD
NEWBURY, MA 01951-1110
Parcel ID: 03-0125-0 Parcel ID: 03-0127-0 Parcel ID: 02-0046-0
BOSTON STREET REALTY, SOURAN ACQUISTION LIM ROGATO ELLEN T
80 BOSTON STREET C/O UNCLE BOBS SELF STG ROGATO JEFFREY M
LYNN, MA 01904 6467 MAIN STREET 13 CLARK AVENUE
WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221-5856 SALEM, MA 0 1970
Parcel ID:03-0120-0 Parcel ID: 03-0076-0 Parcel ID:03-0106-0
DIXON ANNE C FERRAGAMO PAUL J HAPWORTH TY J
MOSTACCI BARBARA A 20 WEBSTER STREET HAPWORTH MICAH L
4 CLARK AVENUE PEABODY, MA 0 1960 28 CLARK ST
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID: 03-0131-0 Parcel ID: 03-0132-0 Parcel ID:03-0079-0
WILKINS JOHN K ABRAHAM FRANCES DELVALLE JORGE D
DONNA M ABRAHAM WALTER ENCARNACION SARI
24 CLARK ST 20 CLARK STREET 7 CLARK STREET
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID:03-0130-0 Parcel ID:03-0083-0 Parcel ID: 03-0084-0
DUNLOP WILLIAM CALVINI RONALD R CALVANI RONALD
CAROLA 21 CLARK STREET 21 CLARK STREET
26 CLARK ST SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970
SALEM, MA 0 1970
Parcel ID: 03-0087-0 Parcel ID: 03-0088-0 Parcel ID: 03-0078-0
DOHERTY ROI BINGHAM RICHARD A JR RUTKOWSKI HENRY W
DOHERTY KEVIN BINGHAM MAUREEN F RUTKOWSKI PATRICIA A
24 BARNES CIRCLE 22 BARNES CIRCLE 5 CLARK STREET
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 0 1970 SALEM, MA 0 1970
Parcel ID: 03-0089-0 Parcel ID:-03-0082-0 Parcel ID: 06-0007-0
SILVAWAYNE PARKER STEPHEN T DRISCOLL BARBARA ET AL
SILVA CATHERINE 26 BARNES CIRCLE 18 WALLACE ROAD
20 BARNES CIRCLE SALEM, MA 0 1970 LYNN, MA 0 1901
SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID: 03-0122-0 Parcel ID: 03-0116-0 Parcel ID: 03-0114-0
PSZENNY ALBIN J DELUCA PETER P LEBLANC RAYMOND G JR
PSZENNY MARCIA S DELUCA ANN M DORIS I
0 CLARK AVE 10 CLARK AVE 5 CLARK AVENUE
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 0 1970 SALEM, MA 0 1970
Parcel ID:03-0113-0 Parcel ID: 03-0107-0 Parcel ID: 02-0021-0
JENNIFER BORDEN TRUST ABRAHAM WALTER R ALMQUIST PATRICIA
BORDEN J S WHELAN FRANCES C 53 PROSPECT ST
3 CLARK AVENUE 20 CLARK STREET ROWLEY, MA 01969
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 0 1970
Parcel ID:03-0137-0 Parcel ID: 03-0108-0 Parcel ID:03-0124-0
ODAY RICHARD L CICCO STEPHEN A RIDGE ROBERTA
11 CLARK AVE CICCO TAMMY M DIMARE-RIDGE DIANA M
SALEM, MA 01970 16 CLARK ST 6 CLARK STREET
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID: 03-0138-0 Parcel ID: 02-0041-0 Parcel ID:03-0112-0
GARRIDO EDDY REBELO JOAO P NGO BAD
MUNOZLUCESITA REBELO FERNANDA G NGO DEBORAH
11 CLARK ST 12 CLARK AVENUE I CLARK AVE
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID:03-0077-0 Parcel ID:03-0121-0 Parcel ID: 03-0081-0
BACHMANN JEFFREY P LUZINSKI WILLIAM A WONG REVOCABLE TRUST OF
BACHMANN JANE P 2 CLARK AVE WONG DAVID/WONG TERESA
3 CLARK STREET SALEM, MA 01970 15 CLARK STREET
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 0 1970
Parcel ID:03-0109-0 Parcel ID: 07-0008-0 Parcel I D: 03-0110-0
FORTIER YOLANDE M TORION JEANETTE H ALEXANDER PAULINA D
C/O POTHIER THOMAS S JR 30 CLARK STREET 12 CLARK STREET
14 CLARK STREET SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 0 1970
SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID:03-0111-0 Parcel ID: 02-0008-0 Parcel ID: 02-0040-0
CABRERA MARCELO L COLPITTS DAVID L GILBERT DAVID M
CABRERA GLORIA COLPITTS PAULA L GILBERT REBECCA S
10 CLARK STREET 18 CLARK AVENUE 16 CLARK AVE
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970
Parcel ID: 06-0010-0 Parcel ID:03-0118-0 Parcel ID:07-0005-0
BOZARJIAN ROBERT M VO HOANG SLEISON JOSEPH
BOZARJIAN ELIZABETH A VO AN LOUISE P
20 CLARK AVE 6 CLARK AVE 36 CLARK STREET
SALEM, MA 0 1970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 0 1970
Parcel ID: 07-0007-0
LUCIANO ALFRED
LUCIANO JOAN FRANCES
32 CLARK STREET
SALEM, MA 01970
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
Notice of Decision
At a meeting of the City of Salem Planning Board held on Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 7:00 pm, at 120
Washington.Street, Salem, NfA, the Planning Board voted on the following items:
A public hearing to consider the application of NSD Realty Trust for a Form C-Definitive Subdivision in
accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six
(26) residential lots, a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of
Ordinances Sec. 7.2, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37, for
the property located on Clark Avenue (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9 Lot). Specifically the applicant proposed to
divide the property into twenty-seven (27) lots for the construction of twenty-six (26) single-family homes.
Decision: Approved
Filed with the City Clerk on: February 22,2016
This notice is being sent in covpliance uitb The Massarbaselts General Laws, Cbapter 40A, Sections 9 & 15 and does not
require action by the redpient.Appeals, if any, sball be made-pursuant to Cbapter 40A, Section 17, and sball befiled ailbin 20
daysfivni the date wbicb The decision ivasfiled wtb the Ci�v Clerk.
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 WWW.SALFM.COM
�C\at-k q�ren� �. — Form C��p\ico.-hors
i
{I
I
I
�.
a
-W,CC
WILLIAMS
SPARAGES
Memorandum
T
To: Salem Planning Board
From: Richard L. Williams, P.E. S
Date: January 28, 2016
Subject: The Woodlands Subdivision,Salem MA
Project Number: SALE-0026
Dear Amanda,
Please find the attached plans which we feel address the remaining outstanding issues as
discussed at the January 21, 2016 planning board hearing.
The plans have been revised to show the following:
• Street light description and locations.
• Updated open space path material and configuration. The path material is specified
as mulch as discussed.
• Revised sidewalk and grass plot widths. The sidewalks have been reduced to 4 feet
in width which is the minimum allowed by ADA. The remaining grass plot is 3 1/2'
wide.
• Revised sidewalk material to concrete.
• Revised street tree locations. The total number of trees shown on the plan is now 61.
,. RECEIVED
JAN 28 2016
DEPT. OF PLANNING &
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Project No. SALE-0026 WILLIAMS
December 16, 2015 W-40 SPARAGES
ENGINEEM v PMNM i �RMCU
Amanda Chiancola
Salem Planning Board T
93 Washington Street S
Salem, MA 01970
Re: Traffic Impact Assessment Review—Residential Subdivision"The Woodlands"
Dear Amanda,
Our Office has reviewed the Traffic Assessment by Abend Associates dated August 2 1,
2006 regarding the traffic impacts from the proposed "Chapel Hill" Subdivision.
The report by Abend Associates evaluated the impacts of the prior approved 26 lot
subdivision. The report relied on accepted traffic engineering standards and practices which
continue to be valid. The report concluded that the project had minimal impact on the adjacent
roadways and that no adverse effects on levels of service would occur. The conditions of the
neighborhood remain almost exactly as they were at the time of the report and we expect traffic
counts to be substantially unchanged from the time of the study.
The Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)trip generation rates for single-family
homes have not changed, therefore the currently proposed traffic generation estimates would be
unchanged from the 2006 report.
It is our conclusion that the 2006 study can be relied on and that the same conclusions
would be reached if a new study was performed.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have regarding this matter.
6 Very trul
:a, k�
Richard L. Williams, P.E.
cc: Meninno Construction
David Knowlton
Joseph Correnti
189 North Main Street, Suite 101 e Middleton, MA 01949 * Tel: (978) 539-8088 e www.wsengineers.com
PLANT LIST
EN ."M
H.- i rM
MF. ..... . .... .......... �"010 WITI,
-NARROW CANOKWIOTH TREESMIMMA'11'4`4 M ig M 4
QTY CODE JBOTANICALNAME COMMON NAME SIZE MARTURE SIZE
Parrotia persica Persian ironwood 3.5"cal. 20'-30'H x 15-25'W
Ginkgo biloba'Princeton Sentry' Princeton Sentry Ginkgo 3.5" cal. 60'H x 25'W
Ulmus parvifolia'Frontiee Frontier Chinese Elm 3,5"cal, 40'H x 30'W
MA
OTY CODE IBOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE MARTURE SIZE
Acer campestre Field—Maple 3.5"Cal. 25-35'H x 25'-35'W
Acer rubrum'October Glory' October Glory Red Maple 3,5"cal. 40'-60'H x 35'-45'W
Gleditsia triacanthos var.inermis'Sky/ine' Skyline Thornless Honeylocust 3.5"cal. 30'-40'H x 30'-40'W
Gleditsia triacanthos var,inermis'Ha/ka' Halka Thornless Honeylocust 3.5"cal. 30'-40'H x 30'-40'W
Tilia cordata'Greenspire' Greenspire Littleleaf Linden 3.5"cal. 40-60'H x 30'-40'W
Tilia tomentosa'Ster/ing' Sterling Silver Linden 3.5"cal. 40-60'H x 30'-40'W
I
LARGE HM
i�M
OTY ICODE JBOTANICALNAME ICOMMON NAME ISIZE IMARTURE SIZE
IRed Oak 13.5"cal. 170"H x 70'W
I IQuercus bicolor jSwamp White Oak 13.5"cal. 170"H x 70'W
Transmittal Letter
Williams & Sparages December 18, 2015
189 North Main Street, Suite 101
Middleton, MA
Phone: 978-539-8088 -W, WILIIAMS
SPARAGES
Fax: 978-539-8200
S
To:
Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner Attention: Amanda
Dept. of Planning & Community Development Clarke Avenue "The Woodlands"
120 Washington Street, 31d Floor Re: Planning Board Submittal Pkg.
Salem, MA 01970
Job Number: SALE-0026
We are sending you
IZ Attached 0 Under Separate Cover via: [Type text here] the following:
0 Shop Drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans El Other:
0 Copy of Letter 0 Change Order 0 Samples
11 Total Quantity 0 Reproducible 11 Specification
Submittal Quantity Date DWG. # Description
3 sets Def. Plans Revised 12/7/15 (11 sheets)
1 12/16/15 Drainage Improvement Plans (24"X36")
1 12/16/15 Drainage Improvement Plan (11"X17)
3 12/7/15 Resonse Letter (9 sheets )8 1/2 X 11"
1 Watershed Map revised 11/10/15 (for NECE)
1 D of submittal materials
These are transmitted as checked below
10 For Approval 0 Approved as Submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
0 For Your Use 0 Approved as Noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
Rl As Requested 0 Returned for Corrections 11 Return corrected prints
0 For Review and Comment 11 Revise and Resubmit/Work May Not Proceed
0 FOR BIDS DUE: 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN
Comments:
Please call with any questions or comments regarding any of the information included in this submittal
package - Peter (The extra def. plans are for engineering & NECE as well as requested)
Copyto:
:0
Signature Peter M. Blais 1, Jr., P.E., P.L.S.
15K,
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
PROJECT EXTENSION REQUEST
Deceffber,31, 2015
(Date)
1, NSD Realty Trust respectfully request that the Salem Planning Board
(Applicant/Attomey)
Clark Avenue and
extend the deadline for action on the project located at Clark Avenue Extension to
(Project Address)
CFebruary 26 , 2016
(Date)
Sincerely,
NSD Realty Trust
By its Attorney,
LWIX M L A'�
= C. Correnti, Esquire
Name
Request: F-1 GRANTED F—] DFNIED
120 WAsDiNGTON STREEr, SALEM, MASsAcHusErrs 01970 * PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 - www.sALEm.com
rT7,,_
AUG
4Aepr
C04M44'.
RECJ-J'Vj�
SERAFINi, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP Nov
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 112015
63 FEDERAL STREET
ING&
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 OPMCIV7,
JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. DARLING 976-744-0212
JOSEPH C� CORRENrl FACSIMILE
978-741-45453
November 17, 2015
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Ben Anderson, Chairman
City of Salem Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan;
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit-,
and Application for Stormwater Management
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chair Anderson:
On behalf of the Applicant, NSD Realty Trust, I hereby request allowance
to continue the hearing date for the above Applications until the Board's next
regularly scheduled meeting on December 3, 2015.
NSD Realty Trust
By its Attorne
I y y
JCC:dl )ose h C. Cqoenti
cc: NSD Realty Trust
SERAFINI , DARLING & CORRENTi, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. OARLING 978-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
978-741-4683
August 27, 2015
Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP, Director
City of Salem
Department of Planning and Community Development
120 Washington Street, 3d Floor
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Ms. Duncan:
Enclosed, for filing with the Planning Board, please find the following:
1. Fifteen (15) copies of Form C - Application for Tentative Approval
of Definitive Plan;
2. Fifteen (15) copies of Application for Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit;
3. Fifteen (15) copies of letter serving as the required narrative;
4. Two (2) copies'of Environmental Impact Study dated August 14,
2015;
5. Three (3) full size sets and twelve (12) half-size sets of Site Plans
dated August 14, 2015, prepared by Williams & Sparages;
6. One (1) electronic copy of all applications materials on disk dated
August 14, 2015; and
August 27, 2015
Page 2
7. Filing fee payable to the City of Salem in the amount of$1,950.00;
and
8. Request for Legal Notice, together with check payable to the Salem
News in the amount of$520.00.
Please schedule this matter for public hearing on the Planning Board's
September 17, 2015 agenda.
Thank you.
MMry truly yours,,
os ph C. Co r nti
JCC:dl
Enclosures
cc: NSD Realty Trust
SERAFINI , DARLING & CORRENTi, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
978-741-4683
August 27, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
Salem Planning Board
120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
and Application for Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chair Anderson:
By Decision dated March 3, 2008, the Planning Board unanimously voted
to approve the application of Chapel Hill, LLC ("Prior Applicant") for the approval
of the Form C Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development
Special Permit ("Decision") for 25 residential lots, which Decision has since
expired (a copy of said Decision is attached hereto).
In accordance with Section 7.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, NSD
Realty Trust ("Applicant"), hereby makes application for a Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit to allow for 26 residential building lots, as well as a
Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan. There is one lot for which the
characteristics have yet to be determined, for a total of 27 lots.
The primary difference between the proposed plan and previously
approved plan is the new roadway layout, which for grading and aesthetic
purposes has less impact to the existing Clark Avenue Extension residents.
As to the Open Space requirement under the Zoning Ordinance, the site is
currently in private ownership and is thus unavailable for public use and/or
recreational facilities. The 6.967 acres of the site to be preserved as open
August 27, 2015
Page Two
space, as shown on the plans submitted, will be available for access to the
residents of Salem. Sidewalks are proposed throughout the subdivision and a
trail system will be constructed on the north side of the site and connect to
adjacent land to the east owned by the City of Salem.
The plans, as filed together with the Environmental Impact Statement,
which serves as the narrative under the list of requests contained in the Definitive
Subdivision Plan requirements, give a comprehensive review of the project.
Wherefore, the Applicant, NSD Realty Trust, respectfully requests that the
Board grant the necessary relief to reflect the filing submitted herewith.
Sincerely,
NSD Realty Trust
y its Att r
I
dJ?sep7. Correnti
JCC:dI
Enclosures
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD 709 3 P 3: [1
'Jf y
March 3,2C08
Decision-Clark Avenue/Chapel Hill
Form C--Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Chapel Hill, LLC
532 Lowell Street
Peabody, rVLA 01960
Re: Chapel Hill- Clark Avenue(Nbp 6,Lots 7,8,9)
On November 1, 2007 the Planning Board of the Cry of Salem(hereinafter referred to as the
"Planning Board"or"the Board") opened a public hearing regarding the application of Chapel Hill
LLC(hereinafter referred to as the"Applicant" and/or"Owner")to allow construction of the
Chapel Hill Subdivision and associated roadways and utilities. 'Me subdivision contains twenty-five
(25) residential lots and one (1) lot zoned residential and industrial.
lbough it is not a condition,it is the Planning Board's understanding that Lot 21,zoned residential
and industrial,cannot be developed as an industrial lot with the access from Clark Avenue through
the residentially zoned portion of the lot. This is based on the opinion of the Assistant City
Solicitor,dated October 15,2007.
It is important to note that the applications, which are the subject of this decision evolved from the
following:
1. A Form B-Preliminary Subdivision Plan Application, which was submitted to the Board
on January 4.2006 and for which a decision was issued by the Board on Apra 21,2006.
The preliminary subdivision plan was a clusterand this approval directed the Owner to
pursue a Cluster Residential Special Permit.
2. A Form C,Definitive Subdivision Plan and Ouster Residential Developrmnt Special
Permit Application to allow construction of the Chapel Hill Subdivision and associated
roadways and utilities to service the construction of thirty seven (37) single family
dwellings was submitted on July 27,2006 with plans dated June 28,2006. 'Me item was
opened at the Planning Board on September 21,2006 and the public hearing was
continued to October 19,2006,November 17,2006,December 7, 2CC6,January 4,2CC7,
January 18, 2007,February 15,2CO7, March 15,2CO7,April 5, 2C07,and June 21,2CC7.
3. On June 21, 2CO7 the Planning Board voted to recommendapproval for a Zoning
Ordinance Amendment to rezone eight parvels on Clark Avenue (Nbp 6, Parcels 4,6, 8,
9, 10, 13, 17,and 19) from Industrial to Residential One Family. 'Me Gry Council
rezoned parcels 4,6, 10, 15, 17,.ind 19 but did not rezone parcels 8 and 9, which are a
portion of the proposed Chapel Hill Subdivision.
'A M
4. A revised single clusterplin(revision dated June 11,2007) was submirted on June 27,
2007 depicting 27 lots (accounting for the lots which were not rezoned). The public
hearing was continued to July 19,2CO7. 'Me single cluster plan was further revised
(August 20,2007) to add additional details and the public hearing was continued to
September 6,2007.
The initial application with all its revisions was voluntarily withdrawn without prejudice,
by the Applicant on October 9,2007 to rectify a potential issue of constructive approval
due to the action of the Board in April of 2007 with regard to continuance. A new
application was submitted on October 9,2007,followed by revised plans (dated October
26,2007) which removed Jennifer Circle. 711ris item was again opened at the Planning
Board on November 1,2007 and the pubfic hearing was continued to December 6,2007,
December 20,2007,January 17,2008,February 7,2008,and February 21,2008.
5. It is important to note that all written materials,information,studies,peer reviews and
anyand all other correspondence involved in these applicatioris were accepted as part of
the record for the applications for which this decision is issued.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 21,2008 the public hearing was closed
and the Board voted by a vote of six(6) in favor(Puleo,Power,Collim,Ready,Kavanaugh,l-bnscom)
and none (0)opposed,to approve the Form GDefinitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential
Development Special Perrnit.Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of a Special
Permit have been met bythe Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance to protect and promote the health,safety,convenience and general welfare of the
inhabitants of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. 'Me Board finds that the
subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential development because it promotes the more efficient
use of land in harmony with existing natural features. The Board recognized that the building lots created
and the buadings to be constructed thereon may have dimensional controls and density regulations
varying from those otherwise permitted by the ordinance or b),law and the approvals are subject to the
following conditions and waivers and/or relief.
1. Conformance with the Plan
Work shall conform with the plans entitled,"Definitive Subdivision Plan Chapel Hill Salem
lvlassachusetts",prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc., 104 Lowell Street,Peabody,
MA,0 1960,dated June 28,2006, and revised June 11,2007,August 20, 2007 and October 26,
2007.
2. E ndorsemcnt of the Plans
Following the statutory twenty(20) day appeal period,the Planning Boa rd will endorse the
original subdivision plans,subject to conditions of this decision, which shall be recorded at the
South Essex Registryof Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the plans,the following items must be
submitted for approval by the Planning Board:
a. A Covenant to secure the construction of iva)s and installation of municipal services,
including required description of mortgages and assents of mortgagees.
b. Acceptable form of grants of easements, dapplicable.
A
c. 'Mis decision shall be referenced on the original plans prior to the endorsement by
the Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the Southern
Essex Registry of Deeds.
3. Amendments
Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the Planning Board
unless deemed insignificant by the Gry Planner. Any waiver of conditions contained within this
decision shall require the approval of the Planning Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
The Subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations and any other applicable regulations as affected by this decision.
In approving the Plans,the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the Subdivision
Rides and Regulations:
a. Section IV X Lf Minimum Center Line Radii of Carved Streets is waived to allow
construction and operations of the streers and ways as shown on the Plans;this waiver is
being granted based on a recommenclation from the consulting engineer that this does not
negatively impact safety or vehicular circulation.
b. of I)qq
4ja d �'As C41
In the judgment of the...B'oard,'the granting of the above waivers is in the public interest and
consistent with the intent of the subdivision control law.
6. Transfer of Ownership
Within five days of transfer of ownership of the subdivision,the Owner shall notify the Board in
writing of the new owner's name and address. T116 shall not include the sale of lots within the
subdivision in the ordinary course of business,but only a sale of the entire subdivision. The
tenns,conditions,restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the
0wner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Security(Section III(B)(5) of the Subdivision RCgUl2tions)
Prior to the release of Any lots for sale or budding,the Planning Board shall require that an
ith a p
-Along,�n to cjt *ofwk". If partial release
re ist'' i�quesie&t i'sc"retion, require deposits to be
INIVIgims t8TD"' I I
broken down in amounts of anticipated requests for release. The applicant agrees to complete
the required improvements in accordance with Section V of the Subdivision Regulations for the
subdivision. Such construction and installation is to be secured by one and/or in part by the
other of the following methods which may from time to time be varied by the applicant with the
reasonable approval of the Planning Board:
a. Endorsement of approval with covenant
The Owner shall file a covenant,prior to endorsement by the Planning Board,executed
and to be duly recorded with the Subdivision Plans bythe�ow-nerof record, which
instrument shall with the land,and shall state that such wa)� and services shown on the
3
approved plans shall be provided to serve anyand all lots before any lot rnay be built
upon or conve%rd,other than by mortgage deed;and/or
-party agreement
b. Endorsement of approval with bonds,surety or tri
The Owner 5hall either file A performance bond,a deposit of money or negotiable
securities,or a tri-parry agreement in an amount determined by the Board to be sufficient
to cover the cost of al]orany one phase of the sub-division of the improvements. Surety,
if f2ed or deposited,shag be approved as to form and manner of execution by the Gry
Solicitor and,as to sureties by the City Treasurer,and shall be contingent on the
construction of the roadway through binder course. Vqun;,Pft*mvewlball,�e 0
L -,U W4u4e ap
51' i6jV
��na�e for ejgWe months
0 an re Ise 0 surety.
The Owner may file a covenant to secure the construction of ways and services for the
entire sub-division and said covenant my be partially released for phases of the sub-
division by bond,surety or tri-parry agreement being filed for any phase or phases of the
subdivision by execution of a recordable instrument so stating by the Planning Board.
c. Timeframe
M '00
aure to Mos6s "'Wj�ii6W
Planning Board.
A,
�8
miownees, . sociati6
a. Dra
submi to e Department of Planning and Commuruiry Development, or
reasonable review as to form and content prior to the issuance of any Certificates of
Occupancy for the proposed dwellings. These documents shall include the foflowing
msponsibdities:
U4
b. 'Me Gry of Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Homeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
Open Space as -shown on the Plans and conskting of approximately 3.875 acres shaU be
perpetually preserveclas open space. The Open Space shall be placed in a corporation or trwr
owned or to be owned by the owners of lots within the subdivision with provisions for limited
casements for recreational use by residents of the Gry of Salem; provided that such ownership
shall vest in the Board sufficient rights to enforce compLnce with restrictions imposed by the
Board as a condition of its(luster Special Permit. Th.e easement documents shall allow for
4
passive,non-motorized recreation and shall empoiver the City at its discretion,to nuke
improvements to the trail systern.
The open space shall be opened for public use upon the issuance of the Cenificate uf
occupancy for the final dwelling orar such an earlier time as mutually agreed to by the applicant
and the Board.
to. Salem Conservation Commission
-434 is tied#
AA-Ac:Qw*xithAemquinimopq(Ord#rofCon�iOpzis.#64 . 5
�C#Salem comervation GDnunission.
b. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work.
11. Trails
Prior to the release of the final Certificate of Occupancy,the trail for the open space will be laid
out,flagged and completed by the Owner. Trail segments will be cleared by manual cutting of
brush and trce saplings to facilitate passage.Ali materials cut or cleared shall be chipped and left
in place. No eartharoving,grading or mowing will occur. Small brush will be cut and dispersed
into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles or mechanical equipment
(other than chippers,clippers,loppers,-and small chain saws for the clearing) will be employed.
12.Trail Signage
Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the truitheads. Sign design and
proposed location shall be submitted for approval to the Cry Planner prior to installation.
Standard trail marking metal tags,used by the Conservation Commission,shall be placed on
trees at eye height,and where trees are not present,on wooden posts or stakes at least three (3)
feet high along the trad at appropriate intervals.
'01 grit sW perform Amif rA(
yq�4p i4gotifica0con,#ad-mrwv,4 pm W, f9r-tb# jo
AP E,cAunar;2,1 70Q I.War foot sc.w. er_sp_,p= b thg�pmpqs s vision s all discharge
y t9whic
l5k6ja Fall be cornoleted a'ndfflows removed to the satisfaction of the Cry
1,Me
*0"
6—R-1roft
Engiireer prior to the issuance of anycenificates of occupancy. All pipes collecting sewage flow
and discharging to the Hghland Avenue pump station shall be included in the program. The
program shall be performed in strict compliance with the latest Guidelines for Infiltration/Inflow
Analyses and Sewer System Evaluation Survey,Revised January, 1993. No such work shall
commence without first meeting with the City Engineer to review the scope of work Ali reports
and summaries of work completed shall be reviewed by the Cry Engineer prior to the start of the
next phase of work starting(phases am outlined in the Guid8ines).
applicant w r—to remove up to,*
amount of flow removed shall not be less than
A'1�533unto flow�ro be!�ddedl�y ih���rbposedesubdivision.
14.1riftastructure Improvements
a. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark Street
and Clark Avenue as depicted on the plan entitled "Clark Street Drainage
Improvements",dated"January 9,2008", revised February 13,2008. -me drainage
improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Cry Engineer,including
5
temporary pavement of the trenches,Nvithin 30-days of work starting on the proposed
subdivision site. In any event,no budding permits %vill be issued prior to completion
of these drainage improvements. Temporary paving shall remain and be rnaintained
by the applicant,until the proposed subdivision is determined to be substantially
lete by the Gry Engineer, "timetheappi WstwLprov*a fulwotho
I
comp --A
1'440 %gjl;"
pavcnientreplAcementprogi XV&
Street/Clark Avenue Intersection: 2404cet eastidjy-toie4&6iines R ot and.10
westerly towards 14ghU nd Avenue.
lk�4 nC,P#Vem;mt repla M- mcf It, A 1W to QarkS1=t
MR as, e.ew-up ment, rom c
reol"germ w'th 24
.A p; f WcW kr,' !:1111ilifI111115:1 I
a
drain6w,
stormwater c --Ne-newlyinst&d4m exist' draiinw.
to
.1h . I The vemant
Lssues wt e.,astmg cw;
'4�Clixrk Street and not cause an driv, ,AysW,;2!
OS;nCONTS-let-es W114��Epplrlolllv n 111 F nor 4
dUirty certificates of o4upancy. Vice
c. OnQ �Stttez/ yetuie iq
Avenve frProthe4A& Clark A th #
&�. Wg Vertical granite Owbing,thelappuganthas
04&y with 2-iriches ofnewpayormiat4 This shali occur when the su6div1sion Ls
do�rhed to be substantiallycoWt.e by the Gry Engineer.
d. If deemed necessary,prior to beginning drainage improvement work the applicant
shag file a Request for Determination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation
Commission and a Notice of Intent.
15. Safety Improvements
The following safety improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificates
of occupancy.
a. Following a recommendation from the Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by
Abend Associates,*1 a
p
at the intersections of a]rstteets in the neighborhood. P-6 owtag a re c o-rnmendation
from the Peer Review Engineer,the applicant has also agreed to paint a center line on
a portion of existing(lark Avenue to guide motorists through the bend
arid,signage shall be installed as shown ort"�"Traf
c I V
DC
fi
Fehr�13,2008,prepared by Eastern (!e!y-X=sociatV-g4s0Vnfz PI
b. Theap LCAM has agreed to aint a crosswalk which will lead from the end of the
SOUEltwesterlysititoWark Ve continijes toi t�.4vorg—%M*th Cla*
Strea#.-M�. 1=55 s ME'apw%pw5Vtd tyi'Mrs N60 Saf-49Y Officjr.
c T
ed to install vertical te curb' the extsung
.An has agre
Gltun=us Conc]Mte-sidewalk at the norihe -en end of
the existu'l ranite curbLn (?,p
V -� 1 ,P IM
a,i0treJ.;I
A.M.4�41 lictnt s btaZo repair th�s2ew'jkls'l I
6
hei
d. JW 4yplicant%ill p�rch e the utib
the '6s'
LEL s on o pe o mirrora its ocatio
t*crioen OftAveffue-Ve 5107
rriitisl�ipp'M`Wed'�y the GrYs Police Safety Offiler'.
e. The applicant shall contribute$5,000 to the City to be used for the removal of a
certain rock and realigning the fence impeding sight distance on Clark AVenUe.
f. if 4,4ne of sight ease=nt is granted to the City bythe property owner of I Clask #
AO.que' the app'liCani-sILZ-p-re-p,irea-pTa-n'showing the easerwrit area to Accolypany
. I
ejl#,f
,mitrdtictinienii Ore-pared by the Gry Solicitor's(Ifice.
A"ditional Spocial Conditions t
a. Sprinklersarc to be designed and instafled in accordance with NFPA 13D standards
forthe Installation of SprinWrSystems in One and Two FamilylDwellingsand
Manufactured homes as required by the Salem Fire Department.
b. Retaining walls shall be constructed in compliance with the Massachusetts State
Building Code CIVIR780.
c. Tlie,fo U'owing fences shJ, be shown on the plans prior to endorsement-and instfed
prior to the issuance of any certificates of occuparic
i. A four(4) foot tall black chain link fence 6 to be installed on the top of,thq,
-6kipe/retaining wall on Lots 2 through 8 and Lots IS through ZO./
ii� A six foot call wood stockade fen"is.to be,immW�owtho4xaparWof I-Y
Clark Avenue on two sides:the side nearest to thes'u' "- Yision entrance,WO
tholvar. The fence would be Jot*courses S56-3 I-OOW 130 feet,and V3-
29-MMMA7 feel.
iii. A four foot mU slatted chain link fence,shall-beinsulledl,,4;the backoft4%,
sidewalk seciiiiii of the retaining wail'in the layoui of Avenue (Ad* t
. I W � )acep
to.21 Clark Avenue .The fence will be 0+913 20,fef
riggMERTUM&
d. When the roadway into the subdivision is constructed,,a4,"sy vod
tiW4MW'tO the
row of arborvitae along the edge of 21(3a, "W' emwarfUrn
back of the eAsting row,or the s 3ME"a",wtireeso the-same'
f -species and s
height shaU be plante&zrrhe-M-of the w. Tbis-writ will only be do- riq
provided permission is gramodbytfa�o*00;6 VIG
.aik Avenue And, the execdiici�
of a release of liability is granted to the applicant and ex"eicutedby the owner of 2 t
Clark Avenue. Any new trees planted shall be at least the height of the shortest tree
in the row and no taller than the tallest tree. 'Me developer shall guarantee the
survival of the trees for a period of one)rjr.
e. Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy three(3) boulders ivill beadded
to the Gty Conservation land at the end of Clark Avenue'18, age if I
agreed upon by the Salern Conservation Commission.
7
17. Sidewalks
Theapplicant shall install bituminous concrete sidewalks Nvith vertical granite curbing
throughout the subdivision,according to the approved plans. Prior to endorsement the plans
shall be revised to remove details of sloped granite.
The species of sEmectrees depicted on Sheets#5 wd 0�of the plans is to be determined by the
a rof Public Services and be a minimumof 3 1h caliperDBH(diameterat breast
J�
M:Iighting -
a. The Owner shall coordinate with the electric company and the aty E leqg**n
regarclua the ' tallai I street lighting within the Subdivision.
b. Th i hting shaff be the responsibility of the Owner until such time asNhe Cry
accepts the Areers.
c. Afinal lighting plan shall be subinitted to the Gty Planner and the Cry Electfician
f&*View and appmuLprior to the issuance of any building permits for tho
proposed dwelling , I
20. Office of the Building Commissioner
All work shall comply with the requirements of the office of the Salem Building Commissioner
as affected by this decision.
21.Office of the City Engineer
The applicant,his successors or assigns shall comply with all requirements of the Cry Engineer
22. Fire Department
AU work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department as affected by this
decision.
23. Health Department
All work shall comply with the general requirements of the Salem Health Department as affected
by this decision.
24. Board of Health(BOH)
'Me Owner shall comply with the following specific conditions issued by the Board of Health:
a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health
Agent of the name,address,and telephone number of the project(site) manager who
will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project.
b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan,no structure shaU be coristructed Until the Licensed Site
Professional responsible for the site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use.
C.'Iradon mmediation kic is instAllecland is operational in each dwelling. I
d. A radon test is conducted following ins"tioa AndL9VS f he diation kk.
,%Sfn 0 E rerne
Ale results mustlM,giVeiftd"Ille'p'u—r'c%a'ser�oTIn�-e mg.
e. The developer will give the ��Iealth Agent A coO, the 2 1,E report..
f. The developer shaU adhere to a drairuge plan as approved by the Cry Engineer.
g. -Me Developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to extertninate the area
prior to construction,demolition,and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the
evtem�inator's invoice to the �kalth Agent.
h. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
i. The developer shall submit to the 1-kalth Agent a written plan for dust control and
street sweeping which will occur during construction.
j. The developer shall submit to the Flealth Agent a written plan for containment and
rernOval of debris,vegetative waste,and unacceptable excavation material generated
during demolition and/or construction.
J IL 'Me Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for Fire fighting.
1. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including
but not lintited to refrigeration and heating,shAll not increase the broadband sound
level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line.
m. 'Me developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill
material needed for the project.
n. The resultant establishment shall dispose of all waste n-raterials resulting from its
operation in an environrnentally sound manner as described by the Board of health.
o. The drainage system for this project m%W kpJIwed and approved b the
Y
'*rtheast Mosquito Control and Wetlands
p. 7he developer shall notify the Fkalth Agent when the project is complete for final
inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met.
25. Pre-Cons truc tion Conference
Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivision,a pre-construction conference shall be
scheduled with the City Planner, the Gry Engineer(or his designee),the Building Commissioner,
the Fkalth Agent, and any other departments that may be necessary. The Owner shall submit a
construction schedule at the time of the pre-construction conference.
26. Construction Practices
All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
a. 'rhe operation of tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work shall
occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 71-7 (5): Q2astruction an
Blastin and bem-een the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM on weekdays and
Saturdays. No work shall take place on Sundays or holidays. The Planning Board
9
�villagree to changes in the starting time,at the request of the applicant and if
approved by a fortnal vote of the Cry Council,as per the ordinance.
b. Any blasting, rack crushing,jack hammering,h)draulic blasting,or pile driving shall
occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5): Construction an
Blasting and be lintited to MondayFriday between the hours of 8.00 AM and 5:00
PM. There shall be no blasting,rock crushing,jack hammering,hydr'aulic blasting,
or pile driving on Saturdays,Sundays,or holidays.
c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance %ith all local and state regulations.
d. AD reasonable action shAU be taken to n Mi 'mize the negative effects of construction
on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided by the applicant to all abutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project.
e. All construction vehicles and equipment shad be cleaned prior to leaving the site so
that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways AS they exit the
site.
f. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rules,regulations and ordinances
of the Cry of Salem.
g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight at the site must be located
completely on the site.
h. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and
Community Development,unless deemed an ernergency by the Salem Police
Department.
27. Blasting
The apphcant or argent shall distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for klassachusetts Property
Owners About Blasting" to aH abutters within three hundred(300) feet of the blasting area.
28. Construction Traffic
a. With the exception of off-site improvements required as part of this decision, An
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within Cry
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning&Community Development prior to construction.
b. A constrL *Qn
Ku -traffic management plan and schedule shall be subrititted to the
VVparin'x-'nt of Planning&Community Development for review and approval prio
to the start of construction.
C. Any roadways,driveways,or sidewalks darruged during construction shall be
restored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. 7he 0tvner shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site,
and clean and s%veep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as
necessary.
29. Progress Reports
Upon the request of the Planning Board, the owner shail submit mports of the prognYff 3 P 3: 113
subdivision's completion.
'10. Clerk of the Works I ('I r Y " E
The services of a consultant to serveas a Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the Gry;tat
expense of the applicant,his successors or assigns as is deemed necessary by the Gry Planner.0
31.Utilities
Any utility installation for housing lots shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer
prior to the issuance of a Budding Permit. All utilities shall be installed underground.
32. As-built Plans &Street Acceptance Plans
As-built plans and Street Acceptance Plans,stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer,shall
be subinirted to the Department of Planning and Qmmuniry Development and DepArtment of
Public Services prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision
And/or the acceptance of any streets.
T'he As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file forinat suitable for
the Gty's use and approved by the Gry Engineer,prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of
Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of anystreers.
A completed tie card,a blank copy(Available at the Engineering Department) and a certification
signed and stamped by the design engineer,stating that the work was completed in substantial
compUance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of the final Clertificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets;As well as,Any subsequent requirements by the GEY Engineer.
33. Violations
Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this pernit byche Planning Board,
unless theviolacionof suchcondition iscuredwithin fourteen (14) days,orwaived bya majority
vote of the Planning Board.
I certify that a copyof this decision and plans has been filed with the Gry Gerk and Copies Are on
file with the Board. The decision shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the
certification of the Gry(lerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that
if such appeal has been filed,and it has been dismissed or denied,is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the
owners (Sertificate of Title if Registered Land. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns,
ihafl pay the fee for recording or registering.
Charles Pulect
Chaimian
SERAFINi, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R. SERArINI. SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
978-741�4683
August 27, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
Salem Planning Board
120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
and Application for Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chair Anderson:
By Decision dated March 3, 2008, the Planning Board unanimously voted
to approve the application of Chapel Hill, LLC ("Prior Applicant") for the approval
of the Form C Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development
Special Permit ("Decision") for 25 residential lots, which Decision has since
expired (a copy of said Decision is attached hereto).
In accordance with Section 7.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, NSD
Realty Trust ("Applicant"), hereby makes application for a Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit to allow for 26 residential building lots, as well as a
Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan. There is one lot for which the
characteristics have yet to be determined, for a total of 27 lots.
The primary difference between the proposed plan and previously
approved plan is the new roadway layout, which for grading and aesthetic
purposes has less impact to the existing Clark Avenue Extension residents.
As to the Open Space requirement under the Zoning Ordinance, the site is
currently in private ownership and is thus unavailable for public use and/or
recreational facilities. The 6.967 acres of the site to be preserved as open
August 27, 2015
Page Two
space, as shown on the plans submitted, will be available for access to the
residents of Salem. Sidewalks are proposed throughout the subdivision and a
trail system will be constructed on the north side of the site and connect to
adjacent land to the east owned by the City of Salem.
The plans, as filed together with the Environmental Impact Statement,
which serves as the narrative under the list of requests contained in the Definitive
Subdivision Plan requirements, give a comprehensive review of the project.
Wherefore, the Applicant, NSD Realty Trust, respectfully requests that the
Board grant the necessary relief to reflect the filing submitted herewith.
Sincerely,
NSD Realty Trust
y its Aft r 'I
�Iw
JCC:dI dJ?sep7.=Correnti
Enclosures
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD 2,M M,'Al 3 P 3:
March 3,2CO8
Decision-Clark Avenue/Chapel Hill
Form G-Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Chapel Hill, LLC
532 Lowell Street
Peabody,KA 01960
Re: Chapel Hill- Clark Avenue (Nbp 6,Lots 7,8,9)
On November 1,2007 the Planning Board of the City of Salem(hereinafter referred to is the
"Plartning Board"or"the Board")opened a public hearing regarding the application of Chapel Fa
LLC(hereinafter referred to as the"Applicant"and/or"Owner') to allow construction of the
Chapel Hill Subdivision and associated roadways and utilities. The subdivision contains twenty-five
(25) residential lots and one(1) lot zoned residential and industrial.
'17hough it is not a condition,it is the Planning Board's understanding that Lot 2 1,zoned residential
and industrial,cannot be developed as an industrial lot with the access from Clark Avenue through
the residentially zoned portion of the lot. This is based on the opinion of the Assistant City
Soficitor,dated October 15,2007.
it is important to note that the applications, which are the subject of this decision evolved from the
following:
I. A Form B-PreliminarySubdivision Plan Application, which was submitted to the Board
on January 4,2006 and for which a decision was issued by the Board on April 21,2006.
The preliminary subdivision plan was a cluster,and this approval directed the Owner to
pursuca(luster Residential Special Permit.
2. A Form C,Definitive Subdivision Plan and Cluster Residential Development Special
Permit Application to allow construction of the Chapel FU Subdivision and associated
roadways and utilities to service the construction of thirty seven (37) single family
dwellings was submitted on July 27,2006 with plans dated June 28,2006. 'Me item was
opened it the Planning Board on September 21,2006 and the public hearing was
continued to OLtober 19.2006,November 17, 2006,December 7, 2CC6,January 4, 2CC7,
January 18, 2007. February 15,2CO7, March 15, 2007,April 5,2C07,and June 21,2CC7.
3. On June 21, 2CO7 the Planning Board voced to recommend approval for a Zoning
Ordinance Amendment to rezone eight parcels on Clark Avenue (Map 6,Parcels 4,6, 8,
9, 10, 15. 17,and 19) from IndUStri.11 to Residentia.1 One Family. 'Me Gry Council
rezoned parcels 4,6, 10, 15, 17,and 19 but did not rezone parcels 8 and 9, whichare a
portion of the proposed Clapel HU Subdivision.
M'
4. A revised single cluster plan(revision dated June 11,2007) was subrnitted on June 27,
2007 depicting 27 lots (accounting for the lots which A-ere not rezoned). The public
hearing was continued to July 19,2CO7. The single cluster plan was further revised
(August 20,2007) to add additional details and the public hearing was continued to
September 6,2007.
The initial application with all its rvvisions was voluntarily withdrawn without prejudice,
by the Applicant on October 9, 2007 to rectify a potential issue of constructive approval
due to the action of the Board in April of 2007 with regard to continuance. A new
application was submitted on October 9,2007, followed by revised plans (dated October
26,2007) which removed Jennifer Circle. This item was again opened it the Planning
Board on November 1,2007 and the public hearing was continued to December 6,2007,
December 20,2007,January 17,2008,February 7,2008,and Febnaary 21,2008.
5. It is important to note that all written materials, iriformation,studies,peer reviews and
any and all other conrespondence involved in these applications were accepted as part of
the record for the applications for which this decision is issued.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 21,2008 the public hearing was closed
and the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor(Puleo,Power,Gollins, Ready,Kavanaugh,F lanscom)
and none (0) opposed,to approve the Form GDefinitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential
Development Special Pennit. Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of a Special
Permit have been met by the Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance to protect and promote the health,safety,convenience and general welfare of the
inhabitants of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. The Board finds that the
subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential development because it promotes the more efficient
use of land in harmony with existing natural features. The Board recognized that the building lots created
and the buildings to be constructed thereon rnay have dimensional controls and density regulations
varying from those otherwise permitted by the ordinance or by-law and the approvals are subject to the
follo wing conditions and waivers and/or relief-.
1. Confommncc with the Plan
Work shall conform with the plans entitled, "Definitive Subdivision Plan Chapel Hill Salem
Massachusetts",prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc., 104 Lowell Street,Peabody,
MA,01960,dated June 28,2006, and revised June 11, 2007,August 20,2007 and October 26,
2007.
2. Endorsement of the Plans
Following the statutory twenty(20) day appeal period,the Planning Board will endorse the
original subdivision plans,subject to conditions of this decision, which shall be recorded at the
South Essex Registryof Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the plans,the following items must be
submitted for approval by the Planning Board:
a. A Covenant to secure the construction of%va)s and installation of municipal services,
including required description uf mortgages and assents of mortgagees.
b. Acceptable form of grants of easements, if applicable.
c. This decision shall be referenced on the original plans prior to the endorsen-writ by
the Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the Southern
Essex Registryof Deeds.
3. Amendments
Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the Planning Board
unless deemed insignificant by the Cry Planner. Any waiver of conditions contained within this
decision shall require the approval of the Planning Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
The Subdivision shall be constructed in Accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations and any other applicable regulations as affected by this decision.
In approving the Plans,the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations:
a. Section IV A 11 Minimum Center Line Radii of Curved Streets is waived to allow
construction and operations of the streets and ways as shown on the Plans;this waiver is
being granted based on A recomanenclation from the consulting engineer that this does not
negatively impact safety or vehicular circulation.
b. $$go iir
ht
In the judgnwnt of the Board,the granting of the above waivers is in the public interest And
consistent with the intent of the subdivision control law.
6. Transferof Ownership
Within five days of transfer of ownership of the subdivision,the Owner shall notify the Board in
writing of the new owner's name and address. 71iis shall not include die sale of lots within the
subdivision in the ordinary course of business,but only a sale of the entire subdivision. 'Me
terms,conditions,restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the
Owner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Security(Section III(B)(5) of the Subdivision Regulations)
Prior to the release of my lots for sale or budding,the Planning Board shall require that in
If partial release
o SUM04or 4 .4 10-411
-'t '- � n-a"
W.._s ECdAIPAgVA -APTOPP 4,KW*Qf1
o sun��!�'tolbe'r'equeste Me anning'scia y,at its aiscretion,require deposits to be
broken down in amounts of anticipated requests for release. The applicant agrees to complete
the required improvements in accordance with Section V of the Subdivision Regulations for the
subdivision. Such construction and installation is to be secured by one and/or in part by the
other of the following methods which rnay from time to tune be varied by the applicant with the
reasonableapproval of the Planning Board:
a. Endorsement of approval with covenant
The(-)%met shall file a covenant,prior to endorseirienE by the Planning Board,executed
and to be dulyrecorded with the Subdivision Plans byth�e o%%Tierof record, which
instrument shall with the land,and shad state that such wa)s and services shown on the
3
approved plans shall be provided to serve anyand all lots before my lot rruy be built
upon or conveird,other thin byrriortgage deed;and/or
b. Endorsement of approval with bonds,surety or tri-party agreement
The Owner shall either file a performance bond,a deposit of money or negotiable
securities,ora tri-partyagreement in an amount determined by the Board to be sufficient
to cover the cost of ad or anyone phase of the sub-division of the improvements.Surety�
if filed or deposited,shag be approved as to form and manner of execution by the ary
Sohcitor and,as to sureties by the Gry Treasurer,and shall be contingent on the
construction of the roadway through binder course.
And shall
inclucle Aj
gd
0
0 e M ase 0 iiire*
Add6ii,1",
The Owner may file a covenant to secure the construction of ways and services for the
entire sub-division and said covenant may be partially released for phases of the sub-
division by bond,surety or tri-parry agreement being filed for any phase or phases of the
subdivision by execution of a recordable instrument so stating by the Planning Board.
c. Timefiame
tatc,MOS6 shz"AUtormw wiiic "t5wrPM
Planning Board.
wne �s��soctabDoe
,�Homo,o e m
,oct,-�f be
a. Drif wpmp
e to e
It,
subn e to e Departmentof Planning and CA)mmunityDevelopment,for
reasonable review as to form and content prior to the issuance of any Cgitificates of
Occupancy for the proposed dwellings. These documents shag include the foilowing
responsibilities:
b. The Gry of Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Homeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
Open Space as shown on the 'Plans and consisting of approxinutely 3.875 acres shall be
perpetually preserved as open space. The Open Space shall be placed in a corporation or trust
ow-ned or to be owned by the owners of lots within the subdivision with provisions for lirnited
easements for recreational use by residents of the Gry of Salem; provided that such ownership
shall vest in the Board sufficient rights to enforce compliance with restrictions imposed by(he
Board as a condition of its Cluster Special Pertnit. The easement documents shall allow for
4
passive,non-motorized recreation and shall empower the City at its discretion,to make
improvements to the trail systern.
The open space shall be opened for public use upon the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the final dwelling orat such An earlier time as mutually agreed to by the Applicant
And the Board.
10. Salem Conservation Commission
I &c ,itions#64-434 issurciP
-am*v�*h Ae mquipstmats, of Order of Go
kid
Itho Salem Conservation Commission.
b. The Applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work
Il. Trails
Prior to the release of the final Certificate of Occupancy,the trail for the open space will be laid
out,flagged and completed by the Owner. Trail segments will be cleared by manual cutting of
brush And tree saplings to facilitate passage. All materials cut or cleared shall be chipped and left
in place. No earthmoving,grading or mowing will occur. Small brush will be cut and dispersed
into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles or mechanical equipment
(other than chippers,clippers,toppers,and small chain saws for the clearing) will be employed.
12.Trail Signage
Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the trailheads. Sign design and
proposed location shall be submitted for approval to the City Planner prior to installation.
Standard trail marking metal tags,used by the Conservation Commission,shall be placed on
trees at eye height,and where trees are not present,on wooden posts or stakes at least three (3)
feet high along the trail at appropriate intervals.
arge
flow
Inflow
commence without first meeting with the Giry ngincer to review the scope of work All reports
And summaries of work completed shall be reviewed by Elie City Engineer prior to the start of the
nexT phase of work starting(phases am outlined in the Guidelines). 34F
e!1!E!Lrhat;�je_j
I p*,uat wig remove Aexuarwe4-&QhutiGn trid'infliawlth sce &jjjj�[Q Wrnisl�e Up Ea*
e amount of flow removed shall not be less thin
R, ,
5'3�niount o flow Mto be!ddedbylth-c�p6iAo;pposeJ subdivision.
Kinfrnstructure Improvements
a. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements At the intersection of(lark Street
and Clark Avenue as depicted on the plan entitled "Clark Street Drainage
Improvements",dated "January 9,2008", revised February 13, 2008. Thedrainage
improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,including
5
temporary pavement of the trenches,nithin 30-days of work starting on the proposed
subdivision site. In anyevent,no building pen-tits %ill be issued prior to completion
of these drainage improvements. Temporary paving shall remain and be maintained
by the applicant,until the proposed subdivision is determined to be substantially'd
complete by the Gry Engineer, iijpirtbeap caja
p4
pavement replacement pros 11 Wilig $&,�n r
Sireet/Clark Avenue Intersection: 240 feet caste'r.Jyto��.Barnes A or and-10
v��csitcily towards MghlAnd Avenue.
vt$Iian consist
4'K."emorit Mplaceavil;�pMgma pph Six
ment tromcuW;ocUM,'4T
Ve
24, '-=. m if n
xA;,v4 achesi , ,
pi I Q' t
ace to is newly im land- dz��- I=ARW
11101"!P9 M
led am,emstuig.
Q4, Strcet=d not cause.an issues-with exisug
rc WAtilitat program Miast'lid completed andapproved by the Uty an FM cj
. WnFer, rt
thijiumce',5fartycenificataof occupancy.
c. On,(,UrkA
vertical granite.cuirbing,the applkatit'has,'A twV' k5'M"M1cirnc
cAking C111
o4&Y with 2-inches-of new pgrygmtstiq This shall occur Acn the s66diviston is
doerned to be substantially C'Oqkte by the Gry Engineer.
d. If deemed necessary,prior to beginning drainage improvement work the applicant
shall file a Request for Determination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation
Commission and a Notice of intent.
15. Safety Improvements
'Me following safety improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificates
of occupancy.
a. Following a recommendation from the Traffic impact Assessment prepared by
Abend Associates, A- licartt has agreed vq1tuatard to rovidc sawgeand striping;
at the intersections 042 Trectsin the neighborhood. F6 i�ing a r.c'co I n une Inclation
from the Peer Review Engineer,the applicant has also agreed to paint a center be on
a portion of existing CArk Avenue to guide motorists through the be d.
and a4W shall be installed as shown on pbg�"T!Tft AIMP42"WeAwt
FebrMffyl.3,2008,prepared by Eastern LZOuWey Associates.
b. The applicasu:has agreed to, ajupt a crosswalk which wililcacl from the cad ofthe
southw,esterlysidcoWarls
Ontalues It
,,with Clay
n s app-M y S,pa�a Saw Off icsr.
c. T Maift, x4sung
,,'4SdgL1icAat has agreed winStAll Vertical cWb' the Ue,6 ---
Gaurrunous conciete sidewalk at the norifilMy'e3n!i "endof
the ew, dnkgrajinite curbin
AvV .1 he sidewa as ne�t
6
existin near the#
d. Ex rech"I r r�
im
.4yplicant p4L.
t
urro
------.5VctIono venue. to!npe 0 nurrora as �--IUW
V e
must�ipp;;Q'gy the Gry's Police Safety Offil r.
e. -17he aipplicarit shall contribute$5,000 to the City to be used for the removal of it
certain rock and realigning the fence impeding sight distance on Clark Arnue.
ff ,red to the Cify by*property owrter of 1 (14, 1
,A line of sight easement is grarx
A�O'AtWl the app licils'��pIO�Ian'showing the easement area to accolp ny
ealfiienr(Wiffiefi6i onipiiiiii by the Cry Solicitor's Office.
"ditional Special Conditions I
a. Sprinklers Are to be designed And installed in accordance %ith NFPA 13D standards
for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in one and Two Family Dwellings and
Manufactured homes as required by the Salem Fire Department.
b. Retaining walls shall be constructed in compliance with the Massachusetts State
Building Code CWW80.
c. Tlw following fences shall be shown on the pliansprior to endozscomm-and instaMed
the
prior to issuance of any certificates of occupapc7i
i. A four(4) foot tall black chain link fence is to be installed on the top of tlW
��slepL-/rctairting wall on Lots 2 through 8 and Lots 18 through 20.t
iL six foot tall wood stockade fence is to be.insUWQ-4,,dmpMP0dYQf I.V
Clark Avenue on two sides:the side heArest to the subdi'vision entrance,aa#
thatear. 'Me fence would be alcu*'66ises S56-31-QOW 130 fee;andV0.
29-TWIN."47 fety.
iii. A four foot tadl slatted chain Erik fence,shall be.insulledVa; kof
the bac
sidewalk secu-011- of the retaining wall In'the layout ofbirk Ave'raise (adjacept
to�21�Clv*Afi�.The fence will be insull'ed fromStittiow0-431014
n.g a n + 'VrV
+
d. When the roadway into the subdivision is constructed, samovedf
row of arborvitae along the edge of ZI " wenuealle' �traw OR e
back of the existing row,or the sad*-nw"�,9�!�:-Mwtrees:of.thesaim's'p-ecie-5=4 �4
height shall be planted-artha-M-olf the e ftzQw. T'his workvili only be donq
n is grant, . . 'M �
id d permissio i tion
prowe 44by.3MMU, M-IU4rk Avenue and.the c=6"i #
of a release of liability 6 granted to the applicant and'exe'cuted by the owner of 21
Clark Avenue. Any new trees planted shall be at least the height of the shortest tree
in the row and no taller than the tallest tree. 'Me developer shall guarantee the
survival of the trees for a period of one)rjr.
e. Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy three(3) boulders nill be added
to the City Conservation land at the end of Clark Avenue 60"pWic-firropage if I
Agreed upon by the Salem Conservation Gonunission.
7
V.SideNvAks
The applicant shall install bituminous concrete sidewalks Nvith vertical granite curbing
throughout the subdivision,according to(he approved plans. Prior to endorsement the plans
shall be revised to remove details of sloped granite.
% Street Trim
Tlw species of street trees depicted on Sheets#5 and I).of the plans is to be determined by the
0 r of Public Services and be a minimum of 3 �i caliper DBH(&=te rat breast
ho.
a. 14 Owner shall coordinate with the electric company and the City Eleq*,--=
regardin -the i "- -ti I street fighting%rithin the Subdivision.
b. Th i hting shall be the responsibility of the Owner until such time asue Gry
accepts the Areets.
c. Afinal fighting plan shall be subrnittcd to the City Planner and the City Elecdician
Wftview and apprpx",rior to the issuance of any budding permits for Ehq
proposed dweUQ unit,-. I
20. Office of the Building Commissioner
Ali work shall comply with the requirements of the office of the Salem Building Commissioner
as affected by this decision.
21.Office of die City Engineer
The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with all requirernencs of the City Engineer
22. Fire Department
All work shaft comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department as affected by this
decision.
23. Health Department
Ad work shall comply with the general requirements of the Salem Health Department as affected
by this decision.
24. Board of Health(BOH)
The Owner shall comply with the following specific conditions issued by the Board of Health:
a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health
Agent of the name,address,and telephone number of the project(site) manager who
%vitl be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project.
b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan,no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site
Professional responsible for the site meets (he DEP standards for the proposed use.
c. A radon remediation kit 4 installed and is operational in each dwelling. I
,a�'; %_
d. A radon test is conducted follovving installation and oee ' n of the remediation ki.
1-
Vie results
8
e. Tbe developer v6iH give the Flealth Agent A copyofthe 21,E report..
f. The developer shalladhem to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer.
g. The Developer shaff employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area
prior to construction,demolition,and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the
exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent.
h. The developer shaU maintain the area free from rodents throughouE construction.
i. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent A written plan for dust control and
street sweeping which wiH occur during construction.
"Me developer shaU subrnit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and
removal of debris,vegetative waste,and unacceptable excavation material generated
during demolition and/or construction.
k. Ile Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for Fire fighting.
1. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including
but not United to refrigeration and heating,shad not increase the broadband sound
level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels rricasured at the property line.
m. "Me developer shafl disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill
material needed for the project.
n. The resultant establishment shall dispose of a1l waste materials resulting from its
operation in an environmenraUy sound manner as described by the Board of health.
'I I ando ap toved by the
;WVA 40�
o.
Ite drainage system for this project.iUM JVM, , iewed
Misciageme
'Northeast Mosquito Control and Wetiaiid;"Q
p. 'Me developer shail notify the 1-kalth Agent when the project is complete for final
inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met.
25. Pre-Construction Conference
Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivis�on,a pre-construction conference shall be
scheduled with the City Planner, the City Engineer(or his designee),the Budding Commissioner,
the Health Agent,and anyother departments that may be necessary. The Owner shad sulornit a
construction schedule at the time of the pre-construction conference.
26. Construction PrActiccs
All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
a. The operation of tools orequipment used in construction or demolition work shall
occur in accordance with Silem Ordinauce 5ection ?7-7 (5): Construction an
Blastin and bemven the hours of 8:00 AM.ind 5:00 PM on weekdays and
Saturdays. No work shall cake place on Sundays orholidjys. -Me Planning Board
9
will agree to changes in the starting time,at the request of the applicant and if
approved by a forrrul vote of the City(a)uncd,as per the ordinance.
b. An,v blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering,h)draulic blasting,or pile driving shin
occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 7 7-2 (5): Construction in
Blastingand be limited to MondarFriday bemven the hours of 8-00 AM and 5:00
PM. There shall be no blasting,rock crushing,jack hammering,h)dr*auhc blasting,
or pde driving on Saturdays,Sundays,or holidays.
c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations.
d. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction
on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided by the applicant to allabutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project.
e. All construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so
that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the
site.
f. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rules,regulations and ordinances
of the City of Salem
g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight-at the site must be located
completely on the site.
h. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and
Gommunity Development,unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police
Department.
27. Blasting
The applicant:or argent shall distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for Massachusetts Property
Owners About Blasting" to all abutters within three hundred(300) feet of the blasting area.
28. ConstructionTraffic
a. With the exception of off-site improvements required as part of this decision,all
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within Cry
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning&Cominunity Development prior to construction.
b. A construction-traffic management plan and schedule shall be subtritted to the
Wp"arit'n-I-e'lnt of Planning&Community Development for review and apprQval prio
to the start of construction. t
C. Any roadways,driveways,or 5idevralks dirruged during construction shin be
restored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. The Owner shall clean constniction vehicles before theyexit the construction site,
and cleanand m-eep all streets affected by their construction truck Eraf fic as
necessary.
10
29. Progress Reports
Upon the request of the Planning Board, the owner shall submit rrpons of the prog
iubdivision's completion. 3 P 3: 113
.w. Clerk of the works I CI IY 1.:LE .
The services of a consultant to serve as a Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the Gtyat
expense of the applicant,his successors or assigns as is deemed necessary by the Gry Planner.
31.Utilities
Any utility installation for housing lots shall be reviewed and approved by the Gry Engineer
prior to the issuance of a Budding Permit. All utilities shall be installed underground.
32. As-built Plans &Street Acceptance Plans
As-bat plans and Street Acceptance Plans,stamped bya Registered Professional Engineer,shall
be submitted to the Department of Planning and Cornmunity Development and Department of
Public Services prior to the issuance of the final&rtificate of Occupancy for the subdivision
and/or the acceptance of any streets.
The As-Bar plans shall be submitted to the Gry Engineer in electronic file format suitable for
the City's use and approved by the Cry Engineer,prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of
Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets.
A completed tie card,a blank copy(available at the Engineering Department) and a certification
signed and stamped by the design engineer,stAring that the work was completed in substantial
compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the Gty Engineer prior to the
issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets;as well as,any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer.
33. Violations
Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board,
unless the violation of such condition is cured within fourteen (14) days, or waived bya majority
vote of the Planning Board.
I certify thata copyof this decision and plans has been filed with the GryClerk and copies am on
file with the Board. The decision shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the
certification of the Cry Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that
if such appeal has been filed,and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owrier of record or is recorded on (he
Owners Certificate of Title if Registered Und. ne owner or applicant, his successors or assigns,
shall pay the fee for recording or registering.
Charles Puleo
Chain-run
Cyry oF SALEm
PLANNING BOARD
iols �YG 2; A 11, 4Q
FORM C FILE it
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLERK, SALEM, MACq
OF DEFINITIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section Ill-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen (15)copies
of this Form C,with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem,Mass., August .26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distr4histry,
ff�W Certificates of Title No PUR� 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seeks 26 residential lobs,--3. undefined lot, and ULIP�Uxbll.tely I �U�eS Of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5.All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization letter attached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA 019U.1
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen(16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
Sibdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
18 Wallace Road
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
MY OF SALEM
PLANNEqG BOARD HIS AM, 21 A 11: 110
FORM C FILE 0
,LTY GLEPA, S I-EK M,,�SS,
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVA
OF DEFINITIVE PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file,by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C,with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem,Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, mA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distr istry,
g�6W Certificates of Title No TdW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seeks 26 rnsidential: ±ots s of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5.All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization letter atj�ached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA –TIgUT—
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
SAbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Barbara Driscoll
Street Address
�0 Roau
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
4
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
iffi AS 29 A ill 48
FORM C HLE 4
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAICITY CLERK, SALEM. MASS.
OF DEFMTIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file,by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped"by the City Clerk and then fifteen (15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shal I be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August .26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex SouthDistriK,,cgistry,
%W Certificates of Title No PUW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seekz 26 residential: lots, ± andufilLed 1: 1 . I Luxiluatety 7 aczes of
-Y� Y'
open space. The total project site area is approx!�;te 7acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization letter atj� ched
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA U1901
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem,Massachusetts 01970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
Stbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
1:8 Wal ace Rua"
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
Crry OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2015 AUG 21 A H: 3q
FORM C
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL FILP 1-r
OF DEFINITIVE PLAN CITY CLERK, SALE.-I. MASS
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file,by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen (15)copies
of this Form C,with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August .26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office Of Essex South 23-str*4gistry,
0��W Certificates of Title No 7dW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seeks 26 residential lots, 1: .,define- -- -1-UxtLLLUtetT-7-Z1UreS Of
open space. The-total project site area is approxi;�;t;�� 717 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization lett�ched
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA 019Ul
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as 11 The Woodlands"
Sikbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address— Barbara Driscoll
18 Wallace Road
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
FORM C FILE
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CIT-YCLERJ�, Si4�1-Em' Wss-
OF DEFINITIVF,PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file,by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen (15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August .26 20 15
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, DIA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration office of Essex South Distr*&istry,
%W Certificates of Title No DWO 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Appliectnt seeks 26 residential futs, i U.XlefilL d Jut, and Upp�UAtiLlateiy 7 acres Of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization letteratijached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number IS Wallace Road
Lynn, MA U1901
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval,by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as" The Woodlands"
Stbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South .Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
18 Wa laue Road
City/Town and State Lvnn,-�� 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD ItI5 U.. 3cl
FORM C FILE i-r
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLEP\K- ,�iALEM,
OF DEFINITIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file,by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem,Mass., August .26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distr4agistry,
RW" Certificates of Title No FJW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applieent: seek� 26 residenb±al lots, 1: UiLd�fjal d tot, and appruxiniatuty-7--arr-es of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization letter at�Ached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
ynn, MA 019U1
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval,by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as "- The Woodlands"
S�Lbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
1:8 Wallace Ruad
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
MY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD Aur 21 A 11: 39
FORM C FILE t
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLERK, SALEM. MASS
OF DEFMTIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C,with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August .26 20 15
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distr*�gistry,
ffW Certificates of Title No 7-�w 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Righland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
S of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization. lej��a �ched
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA U1901
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as" The Woodlands"
S6bdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
18 Wal �odu
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
MY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD 701S AUG 2-� A 11: 19
FORM C FILE il'
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVALCIT Y CLERK, SALEM, MASS,
OF DEFINITIVE PLAN
In accordance with t he provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem,Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration office of Essex South Distr*&istry,
RWM Certificates of Title No PUW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
— P14eant seeks 26 residenbial lots, 1 andeft.Led ot, Mid .1111��xiiLlat�ly ? .1�es of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5.All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization letter_Ltt'�ached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA 01901
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen(16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
S�Lbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woddlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Barbara Driscoll
Street Address 1:8 wall-dc�
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD IgIS him 91 A 11: 3q
FORM C FILE 0
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLEI�K. ,sm-EMMASS.
OF DEFMTIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen (15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem,Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Di!!trWtgistry,
RW" Certificates of Title No PUW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seek. 26 mside.Ljaj !Vt�, 1 UllftfilLed- lot, m'd apyroxtluatety ? acres Of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorizationlettera�ched
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA 019UI
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
Sibdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
18 Wallaue Road
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
L
C,\)�
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD 7011 AUG 21 A 11, 39
FORM C F I L"-- #
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLERK, SAI-EM. t-1ASS.
OF DEFINITIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex Sout� Distriftistry,
PWW Certificates of Title No P6AW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seeks 26 residential ±vbs, 1: andefined lot, m.d at'PIUAtUlately 7 al�eS Of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner see authorization IeLt�ched
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA U19UI
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C"APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen(16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
Slibdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge -Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
i8 Wai
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By: o�53-L-be��, o��
Barbara Driscoll
MY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD A.1-16 2� & 111: 19
FORM C FILE 0
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLEF,K, WLDi. M-,ASS,
OF DEFINITIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped"by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August .26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distriff-&istry,
ff�W Certificates of Title No 7d9k 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applie—h ---it, 26 residentiaI7- 1,ts, 1: rdefined lut, and appl-uximtety 7 acres of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5.All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization- letter atiiached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA U19t)l
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
Stbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara riscoll
1A W-
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
MY OF SALEM
PLANNIN B '2015 AUG 21 A 11: �q
FORM C FILE #
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLERK, SALEM. MAS�Q
OF DEFINITIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem,Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distr*&istry,
RkW Certificates of Title No W 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seek' s 26 msidenbia± lots, ± U11CI fined lot, and -a:pprux1raatety--?—=es of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization. letterAtkached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
ynn, MA
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form 11C11 applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madarn:
I hand you herewith sixteen(16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as " The Woodlands"
Sihbdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Barbara Driscoll
Street Address 18 Wal ace Roa
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD MIS AIIS 9*1 A II: Iq
FORM C FILE rt'
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLERK, SALEM. MASS.
OF DEFINITIVE PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped"by the City Clerk and then fifteen(15)copies
of this Form C,with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distr*&-istry,
X&M Certificates of Title No FdW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seeks 26 residential ±ats, 1: .�.defiJLU lot, and jj,�oXj-rr[a-tU1y-7-aT-TreS Of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization leji�a �ched
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 16 Wallace Road
1,ynn, MA UIVUJ.
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as 11 The Woodlands"
Slibdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
18 Wallaue Ruad
City/Town and State LVnn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
C-� -�
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD INS AM, 9�
FORM C FILE if'
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL CITY CLEPK, Sr'�LEH. tlPSS,
OF DEFINITIVE PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file, by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be "date stamped"by the City Clerk and then fifteen (15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem, Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office of Essex South Distr*&-istry,
ff�W Certificates of Title No P6AW 36055, 36056 and 36057
4. Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seeks 26 xesidenb±al lats, 1: widefilLed 11:.-I ---I - s of
open space. The total project site area is a�pproxii;mateyl� T1 acres.
5.All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization .letter atj� ched
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
i,ynn, MA UJ-901
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as 11 The Woodlands"
Sibdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers le
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara riscoll
1:8 Wall--- ----
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
AECEIVED
CITY OF SALEM AUG 2 12015
DEPT,OF PLANNING&
PLANNING BOARD COMMUNTY DEVELOPMENT
I I �IJG 21 A It' 40
FORM C FILE �0
APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVACITY CLERK, SALI'll. MASS.
OF DEFINITIVF PLAN
In accordance with the provisions of Section 111-A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations the applicant
must file,by delivery or registered mail, a notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for
such determination. The notice shall be attached to fifteen (15) copies of this Form C application. The
notice and copies of the application must be"date stamped" by the City Clerk and then fifteen (15)copies
of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications
shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink.
Salem,Mass., August 26 2015
To the Planning Board:
The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of
Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules
and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem.
1.Name of Subdivider NSD Realty Trust
Address 76 Oakville Street, Lynn, MA 01905
2.Name of Engineer or Surveyor Williams & Sparages,
Address 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton, MA 01949
3. Deed of property recorded in Land Registration Office Of Essex South Distr4histry,
R�NW Certificates of Title No W 36055, 36056 and 36057
4, Location and Description of
Property: The property is located at the end of Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
off of Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the
Applicant seeks 26 residential lvts, 1 unftftned lot, and approxintatety ? acres of
open space. The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the
abutting Owners.
Signature of Owner See authorization. letter atijached
Address Barbara Driscoll
Telephone Number 18 Wallace Road
Lynn, MA --DT99-f--
A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached,which shall be attested to
by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board.
NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO
FORM "C" APPLICATIONS
See Form "C" applications for
complete instructions for filing.
All insertions shall be typewritten
or printed neatly in ink.
Date: August 26 2015
City Clerk
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Dear Sir/Madam:
I hand you herewith sixteen (16) copies of Form C, an application submitted by me
this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by
the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application.
The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as" The Woodlands."
Sibdivision
and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as (insert streets and street or lot
numbers) Clark Avenue Extension, Woodlands Road and South .Ridge Circle
in Ward 3
Signature of Owner See attached authorization letter
Street Address Barbara Driscoll
18 wallam Road
City/Town and State Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone Number
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
SERAFINI , DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR, TELEPHONE
JOH N E D ARLING 97 8-7 44-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
9 78-7 41-4683
August 27, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
Salem Planning Board
120 Washington Street, 3d Floor
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
and Application for Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chair Anderson:
By Decision dated March 3, 2008, the Planning Board unanimously voted
to approve the application of Chapel Hill, LLC ("Prior Applicant") for the approval
of the Form C Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development
Special Permit ("Decision") for 25 residential lots, which Decision has since
expired (a copy of said Decision is attached hereto).
In accordance with Section 7.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, NSD
Realty Trust ("Applicant"), hereby makes application for a Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit to allow for 26 residential building lots, as well as a
Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan. There is one lot for which the
characteristics have yet to be determined, for a total of 27 lots.
The primary difference between the proposed plan and previously
approved plan is the new roadway layout, which for grading and aesthetic
purposes has less impact to the existing Clark Avenue Extension residents.
As to the Open Space requirement under the Zoning Ordinance, the site is
currently in private ownership and is thus unavailable for public use and/or
recreational facilities. The 6.967 acres of the site to be preserved as open
August 27, 2015
Page Two
space, as shown on the plans submitted, will be available for access to the
residents of Salem. Sidewalks are proposed throughout the subdivision and a
trail system will be constructed on the north side of the site and connect to
adjacent land to the east owned by the City of Salem.
The plans, as filed together with the Environmental Impact Statement,
which serves as the narrative under the list of requests contained in the Definitive
Subdivision Plan requirements, give a comprehensive review of the project.
I Wherefore, the Applicant, NSD Realty Trust, respectfully requests that the
Board grant the necessary relief to reflect the filing submitted herewith.
Sincerely,
NSD Realty Trust
y its Aft r
I
J s
JCC:dl S'ep Correnti
Enclosures
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD IrM 11,"," 3 P 3: 11
A I r
March 3, 2CO8
Decision -Clark Avenue/Chapel Hill
Form G-Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Chapel Hill, LLC
532 Lowell Street
Peabody, rvIA 01960
Re: Chapel Hill- Clark Avenue (1vlap 6, Lots 7, 8,9)
On November 1,2007 the Planning Board of the City of Salem(hereinafter referred to As the
"Planning Board" or"the Board") opened a public hearing regarding the application of Chapel Hill
LLC(hereinafter referred to as the'Applicant" and/or"Owner") to allow construction of the
Chapel Hill Subdivision and Associated roadways and utilities. The subdivision contains mvnty-five
(25) residential lots and one(1) lot zoned residential and industrial.
Though it is not a condition,it is the Planning Board's understanding that Lot 2 1,zoned residential
and industrial,cannot be developed as an industrial lot with the access from Clark Avenue through
the residentially zoned portion of the lot. This is based on the opinion of the Assistant City
Solicitor,dated October 15,2007.
It is important to note that theapplications, which are the subject of this decision evolved from the
following:
1. A Form B-Prelimin4ry Subdivision Plan Application, which was submirted to the Board
on January 4,2006 and for which a decision was issued by the Board on April 21,2006.
The preliminary subdivision plan was a cluster,and this Approval directed the Owner to
pursue a Cluster Residential Special Permit.
2. A Form G Definitive Subdivision Plan-and Cluster Residential Development Special
Perntit Application to allow construction of the Chapel k7fill Subdivision and associated
roadways and utilities to service the construction of thirty seven (37) single family
dwellings was submitted on July 27,2006 with plans dated June 28,2006. 'Me item was
opened At the Planning Board on September 21, 2006 and the public hearing was
continued to October 19,2006, November 17, 2006,December 7,2CC6,January 4,2CC7,
January 18,2007,February 15,2C07, March 15,2CO7,April 5,2C07,And June 21, 2CC7.
3. On June 21,2CO7 the Planning Board voted to recommend approval for a Zoning
Ordinance Amendment to rezone eight parcels on Clark Avenue QvIap 6,Parcels 4,6, 8,
9, 10, 15, 17,and 19) from Industrial to Residential One Family. The Cry Council
rezoned parcels 4,6, 10, 15, 17,and 19 but did not rezone parcels 8 and 9, which Are a
portion of the proposed Chapel Hill Subdivision.
'A
4. A revised single clus ter plan(revision dated June 11,2007) was submitted on June 27,
IC07 depicting 27 lots (accounting for the lots which�ere not rezoned). 'Me public
hearing was continued to July 19, 2007. The single cluster plan was further revised
(August 20,2007) to add additional details and the public hearing was continued to
September 6,2007.
The initial application with all its revisions %vas voluntarily withdrawn withour prejudice,
by the Applicant on October 9,2007 to rectify a potential issue of constructive approval
due to the action of the Board in April of 2007 with regard to continuance, A new
application was submitted on October 9,2007,foHowed by revised plans (dated October
26,2007) which removed Jennifer Circle. This item was again opened at the Planning
Board on November 1, 2007 and the public hearing was continued to December 6,2007,
December 20,2007,January 17,2008,February 7,2008,and February 21, 2008.
5. It is important to note that all written materials,information,studies,peer reviews and
any and all other correspondence involved in these applications were accepted as part of
the record for the applications for which this decision is issued.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 21,2008 the Public hearing was closed
and the Board voted by a vote of six(6) in favor(Puleo,Power,Collins, Ready,Kavanaugh,I-Lnscom)
and none (0)opposed,to approve the Form GDefirlitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit. Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of a Special
Pertnit have been met by the Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance to protect and promote the health,safety,convenience and general welfare of the
inhabitants of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. The Board finds that the
subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential development because it promotes the more efficient
use of land in harmony with existing natural features. The Board recognized that the building lots created
and the buildings to be constructed thereon rruy have dimensional controls and density regulations
varying from those otherwise permitted by the ordinance or by�law and the approvals are subject to the
following conditions and waivers and/or relief-.
1. Conformance with the Plan
Work shaft conform with the plans entitled,"Definitive Subdivision Plan Chapel Hill Salem
Massachusetts",prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc., 104 Lowell Street,Peabody,
MA,0 1960,dated June 28,2006,and revised June t 1,2007,August 20, 2007 and October 26,
2007.
2. Endorsement of the Plans
Following the statutory menry(20) day appeal period,the Planning Boa rd Will endorse the
original subdivision plans,subject to conditions of this decision, which shall be recorded at the
South Essex Registry of Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the plans,the following iterns must be
submitted for approval by the Planning Board:
a. A Covenant to secure the construction of%vays and installation of municipal services,
including required description of mortgages and ments of mortgagees.
b. Acceptable form of grants of easements, if applicable.
c. This decision shall be ruferenced on the original plans priorto the enclorsernent by
the Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the Southern
Essex Registn of Deeds.
3. Aniendments
Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the Planning Board
unless deemed insignificant by the City Planner. Any waiver of conditions contained within this
decision shall require the approval of the Planning Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
The Subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations and any other applicable regulations as affected by this decision.
In approving the Plans,the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations:
a. Section IV A.Lf Minimum Center Line Ra6 of Curved Streets is waived to allow
construction and operations of the streets and ways as shown on the Plans;this waiver is
being granted based on a recorrunenclarion from the consulting engineer that this does not
negatively impact safety or vehicular circulation.
b. Maximum Le of,DvAd�gric['Stme;sjs�Waivqcl based on the
or ins 1.4on" r systgrx"
"fp', , I g$
In the judgment of the Board,the granting of the above waivers is in die public interest and
consistent with the intent of the subdivision control law.
6. Transfer of Ownership
Within five days of transfer of ownership of the subdivision,the Owner shall notify the Board in
writing of the new owner's name and address. 71tis shall not include the sale of lots within the
subdivision in the ordinary course of business,but only a sale of the entire subdivision. 'Me
terms,conditions,restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the
Owner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Sccurity(Section III(B)(5) of the Subdivision Regulations)
Prior to the release of any lots for sale or budding,the Planning Board shall require that in
surgqvis- pAw&-49pg,wi'th a prop Oule of,tx-kmq#. If partial release
qu tM,f iW4
6T surety'is to`b� iii ' es' ITI anmingi da 'rhay, its discretion, requare deposits to be
broken down in amounts of anticipated requests for release.'Me applicant agrees to complete
the required improvements in accordance with Section V of the Subdivision Regulations for the
subdivision. Such construction and installation is to be secured by one and/or in part by the
other of the following methods which nuy from time to time be varied by the applicant with the
reasonable approval of the Planning Board:
a. Endorsement of approval with covenant
The Ulwner shag file a covenant,prior to endorsement bV the Planning Board,executed
and to be duly recorded with the Subdivision Plans by the owner of record, "hich
instniment shall with the land,and shall state that such ways and services shown on the
3
approved plans shall be provided to serve any and all lots before any lot rTuy be built
upon or conveYed,other than by mortgage deed;and/or
I re
b. Endorsement of approval with bonds, surety or tri-party- 9 ement
Me Owner shall either file a performance bond,a deposit of money or negotiable
securities,or a tri-partyagreement in an amount determined by the Board to be sufficient
to cover the cost of all or anyone phase of the sub-division oi the improvements. Surety,
if filed or deposited,shall be approvedas to form and manner of execution by the Cry
Solicitor and,as to sureties by the Cry Treasurer,and shall be contingent on the
construction of the roadway through binder course. The-amount of,the sqwm, -Aalbee.0
re4son.4bly.(jqr=nined b the,-CA q iaU include
ffSalem E, eeAng i5eprtmett;4nd s! , .
XalWo powor mau
MMITORMeW= iteri#nce,f6r eighiiiW(U)'*ittk�
ty.
cb o� e an.'release of sure
_Wkfion,6f&I
The Owner may file a covenant to secure the construction of ways and services for the
entire sub-division and said covenant may be partially released for phases of the sub-
division by bond,surety or tri-parry agreement being filed for any phase or phases of the
subdivision by execution of a recordable instrument so stating by the Planning Board.
c. Timeframe
60-750
a to �6 ShA
Planning Board.
t, Mjitiinownees,Associa
a. Draft' afiil6n,44-idii�ekqftT�mt U. be
1136c
subrrutWretoMe teparrment of Planning and Community Development,for
reaso nable review as to form and content p rior to the issuance of any Certificates of
Occupancy for the proposed dwellings. These documents shall include the following
responsibilities:
b. The Gryof Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Homeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
Open Space as shown on the Plans and consisting of approximately 3.875 acres shall be
perpetually preserved as open space. The Open Space shall be placed ina corporation or trust
owned or to be owned by the owmers of lots within the subdivision with provisions for limited
easernents for recreational use by residents of the Cry of Salem provided that such ownership
shall vest in the Board sufficient rights to enforce compliance with restrictions imposed by the
Board as a condition of its Cluster Special Permit. The easement documents shall allow for
4
passive, non-motorized recreation and shall empower the City at its discretion,to nuke
improvements to the trail synem.
The open space shall be opened for public use upon the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the final dwelling or at such an earlier time as mutually agreed to by the applicant
and the Board.
10. Salem Conservation Commission
rk ShAllpm;*,-ithithe requiremen%q(.0nier of Gandid(?ns#64-434 isspedf
,:,,y the Salem Conservation Commission.
b. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work-
11. Trails
Prior to the release of the final Certificate of Occupancy,the trail for the open space will be laid
out,flagged and completed by the Owner. Traa segments will be cleared by manual cutting of
brush and tree saplings to facilitate passage. All materials cut or cleared shall be chipped and left
in place. No earthmoving,grading or mowing will occur. Small brush will be cut and dispersed
into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles or mechanical equipment
(other than chippers,clippers,loppers,and small chain saws for the clearing) will be employed.
12.Trail Signage
Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the ttailheads. Sign design and
proposed location shall be submitted for approval to the City Planner prior to installation.
Standard trail markingMet2l tags,used by the Conservation Commission,shall be placed on
trees at eye height,and where trees are not present,on wooden posts Or stakes at least three (3)
feet high along the trail at appropriate intervals.
4 W�oQrm'n'�wer 3r
s
com
n rt
'hill
fa ce
line
s
'So ' -mtuan co y
0 g
a e
Jin g e h flow
r pnort r e
c g to M d v e P
nd dis hamin the k and A enu
7 g
prugtam shan be pe�onrned in stnct comp Inflow
Analyses and Sewer System Evaluation Survey,Revised January, 1993. No such work shall
commence without first meeting with the City Engineer to review the scope of work. All reports
andsummaries of work completed shall be reviewed by the CityEngineerprior to the start of the
next phase of work starting(phases am oudined in the Guidelines). LrV*=qV!.g: 'utixtha;the d
ty
iciiii-to Riii--'
.1p ,liqant,,T xemove,Atextt: sm; n move up too
e amount of flow removed shall not be less than
ffE—jffiount of flow to be added by the proposed subdivision.
14.Infrastructure Improvements
a. 'Me applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark Street
and(lark Avenue as depicted on the plan entitled"Gark Street Drainage
Improvements",dated"January 9,2008", revised February 13, 2008. The drainage
improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,including
5
temporary pavement of the trenches, �vithin 30-days of work starting on the proposed
subdivision site. In an),event,no budding permits vvill be issued prior to completion
of these drainage improvements. Temporair-Y paving shall remain and be maintained
by the applicant, until the proposed subdivision is determined to be substantially
complete by the Gry Engincer,.itttAich.t�w�the,app�c*nt shall.provide a fyA?�44
liirtitilroih�Meen%r 6f the rk
pavement replacement prograAwr e 0 OW—9 Bames
Sfheet/Clark Avenue Intersection: 24afeet caiEirliFt,O;i�" ROa And 30 lee�
Westerly towarcls; Hjhlanc!'A�enue.
b�jne,pavement replacert
,WrIt-PTORCAM APPk,d W(larkStmet shall consist of grinding
andre'�mov-ing no ICAM-�"t-in-eve's 0 e existin 9 Ira V 4 ''R curt),
n D-14 nent,wi h 2"' 0�to
epj�icqmcm wit -Linches(or mom if n ess 0
a rove r
sto r c aveyance to the newly installed:and existing d ifitie
ort.Clark Street and not cause arry,issues with existin IlLe vernent
j rqeW-1Y`-,
--iiiF5i-=mp-Tt7e -an—T�apr ov Tylffi�iEnginf!rp rtcO
ov
rep cement program m no�
abeeoTiny certificates of occupancy.
c. On Clark,Avenue from�the0a&,Stmt/C-arkAvenue��tersections(.?4ke4Ytg,*_#
Alitailg I v�e-nical gmnsite curbing,theapp"t1w,agme tto!patcl teiencies.�and$
"haii
oVerlay with 2-inches-of new paygment.1 This s occur when the subdivision Ls
lly ' "I'te by the C
de'emed to be substa'nti! comp e Aty Engineer.
d. If deemed necessary,prior to beginning drainage improvement work the applicant
shall file a Request for Deternnination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation
Commission and a Notice of intent.
15. Safety Improvements
The following safety improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificates
of occupancy
a. Following a recommenclation from the Traffic impact Assessment prepared by
ta, to COW& i W
Abend Associates,tbe�alp licant has agreed vohm $19T pandstripinj
-C in tf� h6iiiri 6d
at the intersections 0 stmets n i owing a mc mme ation
from the Peer Review Engineer,the ap i t has also agreed to paint a center line on
a portion of existing Clark Avenue to guide motorists through the be
and-signage sW be installed as shown Qqj!h"T -yernenvP
FebturrY13,2008,prepared byEasmm Lan urveyAsso�iat�s.
b. The applicant has,agreed. a crasswalkwhichwill.le4f;qrn the end of the
J u0n,. 1
southwesterlysidcof ClarkMe h-comu'llaei to Eliei
,4ipsg; xwith ark
-gin
Ave� Offic.9r.
, biappro�id
Stme#--M�i oti -A on sM be approv�e
c. I to u1sta vemiq ite c the existing,
,,j&&R&Uc4jt has agreed
yen V
GiturrutiQlasconcrete sijewalkat the northe en end of
'the elW' ttn b' -f-aw,a-
ing
granite cur h g"ROVA A9 W*!
-a 'alio' re, h Me a
fiii Mevva :iiln-M41
6
d. J.he,applicant v%ill purchas nWr) t on the exts�ujg,urifi le h
TaMe M�2119
"se ILI e n E 10
Rkv�enuee npe )rl its loc-11104
bend on the m. ' ting soecrLIMondoxf
1nusM;`MpO;rvQ bythe City's Police Saferyofficer.
e. The applicant 5hall contribute $5,000 to the City to be used for the removal of A f
c'ertain rock and realigning the fence impeding sight distance on Clark AVenue.
f. lf�;line of sight easement is granted to-the Cilry by rlre�property owner of i Clark p
P64ftue.,-the,a'pplica,m`;=TMe`pTreI`�G showing the casement area to accor9pany
eillrawnt-doCuffienispWolmd by the Gty Solicitor's(Xfice.
I*Additional Special Conditions I
a. Sprinklers am to be designed and installed in accordance with NFPA 13D standards
for the installation of Sprinkler Systems in One and Two Family Dwellings and
Nlanufactured homes as required by the Salem Fire Department.
b. Retaking walls shall be constructed in compliance with the Massachusetts State
Budding Code Q�W80.
c. r ell
F.following fences shall be shown on the,plans prio to endors rpent andinstilled
pnor to the issuance of any certificates of occupancr,
i. A four(4) foot tall black chain link fence is to be installed on the top of thq
--slopi/retaining wall on Lots 2 through 8 and Lots 18 through 20.jr
ii� Asix foot call wood stockade fence is to be stalled�qq
in the4xoperty.*f Jy�
Clark Avenue on two sides:the side he'-arise 16 the subdivision entrance,2 no
th'ix'ear. ;and S
w The fence would be`Il&nQjZ&rse3 S56-31-OOW 130 fee J3-
IV-=q34-47 fef
iii. A four foot tall slatted chain"fence,shallbeinstalle&at,the backof tkev
' � �f ven- '(idi
sidewalk secd6n of the retaining waU'Linihe IA-yout o darii A ue i. )aCept
to a2l*GLvk Aven*.Tbe fence will be installed fronrSta n-0-0310101T
iZr
'r +
Edt on T wldlreirfig
d. When the roadway into the subdivision is constructed,4 rmes,rernoved f It
row of arborvitae along the edge of 2:1 Oark -venue al$;��to g
I 'r,91now trees of.the-same4pecies and
back of the exiisting row,or 11 1 j
height shall be planted-irthetWRE—of the,exist-i'd r0w. Tbi$lwo*.wM only be do%
od,byjhe�.,.Rb nZwd,rhc execution
0
provided permission is grant! Ave
of i'miiase of Nab ility is grantedto the I ipplicantand e xecut I e d b Y`the o I w nerof 21—
Clark Avenue. Any new trees planted shall be at least the height of the shortest tree
in the row and no taller than the tallest tree. 'Me developer shall guarantee the
survival of the trees for a period of one)ear.
e. Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy-three(3) boulders %%ill beadded
to the Gty Consmation landat the end of Clark Av%:m4'ib'PWven(V'*age if i
agmed upon by the Salem Conservation Gonunission.
7
17. Sidewalks
The applicant shag install bituminous concrete sidewalks %vith vertical granite curbing
dirotighout the subdivision,acconling to the approved plans. Prior to endorsement the plans
shag be revised to remove details of sloped granite.
%�;'Sltrtet Tmfi
The species of street trees depicted on Sheets#5 and 13,of the plans is to be determined by the
a Rigor of Ptubfic Services and be a minimum of 3 1/1 caliper DBH(diameter at breast
h OrPited.
19.:vtighting
a. The Owner shag coordinate with the electric company and the City Eleqo;ian
regarding the installation of street lighting within the Subdivision.
b. fighting shall be the responsibility of the Owner until such time askhe City
accepts the Areets.
c. klinal fighting plan shag be submitted to the City Planner and the City Elec4iciAn
f vi and appro
tew _ Wprior to the issuance of any building pennits for thq�,
proposed dweUQ units. J
20. Office of the Building Conunissioner
All work shag comply with the fecluirements of the office of the Salem Building Commissioner
as affected by this decision.
2 I.Office of the City Engineer
'Me applicant,his successors or assigns shag comply with all requirements of the City Engineer
22. Fire Department
AU work shag comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department as affected by this
decision.
23. Health Department
All work shag comply with the general requirements of the Salem Health Department as affected
by this decision.
24. Board of Health(BOH)
The Owner shall comply with the following specific conditions issued by the Board of Health:
a. -Me individual presenting the plan to the Board of Flealth must notify the Health
Agent of the name,address,and telephone number of the project (site) manager who
will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project.
b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Nlassachusetts
Contingency Plan,no structure shag be constructed until the Licensed Site
Professional responsible for the site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use.
c. A radon remediation WE is.installed and is operational in each dwelling. I
d. A radon test is conducted following insuflationand Went ' n of the remediation lif
e. The developer wifl give the Health Agenta copyof the 21E,report.-
f. The developer shaU adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer.
& The Developer shaff emplo'v a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area
prior to construction,demolition,and/or blasting and shjJ send a copy of the
exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent.
It. Tlie developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
i. The developer shaH submit to the Fkalth Agent a written plan for dust control and
street sweeping which will occur during construction.
The developer shaU subritit to the Fkalth Agent a written plan for containment and
removal of debris,vegetative waste,and unacceptable excavation material generated
during demolition and/or construction.
k. Ile Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting.
1. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including
but not limited to refrigeration and hearing,shail not increase the broadband sound
level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line.
m. 'Me developer shaU disclose in writing to the Ficalth Agent the origin of any fill
material needed for the project.
n. The resultant establishment shafl dispose of aU waste materials resulting from its
operation in an environnientaUy sound manner as described by the Board of health.
o, M- te drainage system for this prdjec;.MtW, viewedand approved by the
P"
nt
Noith MwMgwe�zmtspfn�c
east Mosquito Control and Wed-ands Managerbirut wcf."/
p. 'Me developer shaU notify the Fkalth Agent when the project is complete for final
inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been art.
25. Pre-Cons truc tion Conference
Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivision,a pre-construction conference shaU be
scheduled with the Gry Planner, the Cry Engineer(or his designee), the Building Commissioner,
the Fkalth Agent,and any other departments that may be necessary. 'Me Owner shall submit a
construction schedule at the time of the pre-construction conference.
26. Construction Practices
AA constniction shjfl be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
a. ne operation of tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work shafl
occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section )7-2 (5): Cbmtrvction an
Blastin and berween the hours of 8:00 A.Mand 5:00 PM on weekdays and
Sirurdays. No work shal]take place on Sundays or holidays. 'Me Planning Board
9
�%iH agree to changes in the starting rime,at the request of the applicant and if
approved by a fortnal vote of the City Council,as per the ordinance.
b. Any blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering,h)drauEc blasting,or pJe driving shaH
occur in accordance �%ith Salem Ordinancg Section 11-2 (5): Construction an
Blavingand be "red to Monday-Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00
PM. 'Mere shall be no blasting,rock crushing,jack harrunering,hydraulic blasting,
or pile driving on Saturdays,Sundays,or holidays.
c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations.
d. All reasonable action shaU be taken to minirnize the negative effects of construction
on abutters. Advance notice shaH be provided by the applicant to all abutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project.
e. AU construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so
that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the
site.
f. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rules,regulations and ordinances
of the City of Salem
g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight at the site must be located
completely on the site.
h. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and
Community Development,unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police
Departrnent.
27. Blasting
The applicant or argent shall distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for Massachusetts Property
Owners About Blasting" to all abutters within three hundred(300) feet of the blasting area.
29. Construction Traffic
a. With the exception of off-site improvements required as part of this decision, A
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within Cry
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning&Community Development prior to construction.
b. A construw4Qn-traffic management plan and schedule shaU be submitted to the
W,- 4r—t`me'n-t of Planning&Community Development for review and approval pti(�Fe
to the stun of construction.
c. Any roadways,driveways,or sidewalks damrged during construction shaV be
resiored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. Ile Owner shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site,
and clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as
necessary.
10
29. Progress Reports
Upon the request of(he Planning Board, the u%Amer shall submit rx!ports of the prog
iubdivision's completion. TT F 3 P 3:
30. (leck of the Works I CI I'( i.:LE ' 'I;- ,I I
'ne services of a consultant to serve as a Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City,at t�e
expense of the applicant,his successors or assigns as is deented necessarT by the Gry Planner.
31.Udlities
Any utdiry insraflation for housing lots shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer
prior to the issuance of a Budding Per-mir. All utdities shall be installed undergmund.
32. As-built Plans &Street Acceptance Plans
As-buJt plans and Street Acceptance Plans,stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer,shall
be submitted to the Department of Planruing and Community Development and Department of
Public Services prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision
and/or the acceptance of Any streets.
The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the Cry Engineer in electronic file format suitable for
the Citys use and approved by the Gry Engineer,prior to the issuance of the final Certificate Of
Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets.
A completed tic card,a blank copy(Available at the Engineering Department) and a certification
signed and stamped by the design engineer,stating that the work was completed in substantial
compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the Gty Engineer prior to the
issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets;as well as,any subsequent requirements by the Gry Engineer.
33. Violations
Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board,
unless theviolationof suchcondition is cured within fourteen (14) days,orwaived bya majority
vote of the Planning Board.
I certify that a copy of this decisionand plans has been filed with the Gry Clerk and copies are on
file with the Board. The decision shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the
certification of the Cry Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that
if such appeal has been filed,and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the
Owners Certificate of Title if Registered Und. 'Me owrier or appEcant, his successors or assigns,
shafl pay the fee for recording or registering.
Charles Puleo
Chairman
RECrgo' lvro
CITY OF SALEM AUG
PLANNING BOARD DEPT,OF PLANNINO&
COMMUMTy D-,�r�L.OP%ASNT
CITY OF SALEM 2015 AUG 21 A 11: 3`1
APPLICATION FOR
, CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERMIT FILEff
PER SECTION 7.2 CITY CLEPK. SALEM.MASS.
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map & Lot: map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: ceraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State,Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Pro ect Dim li tcion incljadin��rot5edlot crJea kl Irontua e for ach I t:
s_"-_ - L- - r 4--Alw� c 0
The propehy 0 at,;d t he d 0 ven e and clarx Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, I undefined lot, and approximately 7 Tcres of—open space.
The fotal project site area �s approx-imately 17 acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
open S�i-a—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements.
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. Ill. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health, Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department, Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By �Jts
614fleP12%_7 See attached authorization letter
(Si/na/ure&Atplicant Signature of Owner(attached consent tenet is also acceptable)
oseph C. Correnti, Esquire
ugust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
CITY OF SALEM 2015 AUG 21 A [1: 39
APPLICATION FOR
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL��T F ILE it
LE
PER SECTION 7.2 RK, SALEK MASs.
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 63 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State, Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Pro ect De§c tion incli ingeo seLlot Cr1egagn Ironluaee for each lot:
s_�— -- 1d L--F—
The property 1 ocat,,d at d of Aven anct ularK avenue, Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, I undefined lot, and approximately 7 ��cres—of open space.
The total project site area is approximately l/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
open Spa—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
1. A brief narrative that addresses See. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. 111. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department, Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By jj�ts
6WIM-7 See attached authorization letter
YSi n re plicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
oseph C. orrenti, Esquire
Ziust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits'necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2015 AUG 21 A 11: 3q
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FILE
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL RWIVRK, SIIILEKIMIASS,
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLE
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State,Zip Code: 63 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Pro ect Dim tion inclpdin��rotsedlot area andKfr�ontaee for each lot:
s ocatd
The propert ql� at he d 0 k venu
y Cla ana uiarx avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, I undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres of open Space.
The fotal project site area is approximately 11 acres.
See attached list ofindividual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1-. 168,388 s.f.
--Up-enSpace 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec- 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. III. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five (35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department, Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or reftising the
special permit. The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By -ts;
a See attached authorization letter
(Si na/ure&A I licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
o 0
s trenti, Esquire
u u
gust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2015 AUG 21 A 11: 39
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR HLE 0
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PEP-AMY CLERK, SALCEM. tIASS,
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 63 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State, Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Pro cL e�c lion incl dinf ro sedlo,areaapdAfrontuage for each lot:
&_& 1� _ _ IL_
Pe y s�
The pr ocat,,d at he d 0 ! Cl k ven e and Clark Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres o open space.
The fotai project site area is approximat:617 17 acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
Open Sp-a—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. III. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department,Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By(,l-ts
iSee attached authorization letter
lS Si nature&Atplicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
i
seph C. torrenti, Esquire
ougust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
1015 AUG 21 A 11* 3q
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FILE 1'
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERM11EY CLERK, S ALEM, MASS.
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. 4ftD1sc -for each ot:
�Icion inclia in��rogedlot area and frontage
Ld
The pr 0 at,�d t he d or Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres of open space.
The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
Open STa—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements.
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 72.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
1 Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
A
C. 111. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department,Department
of Public Services,and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. 'Me Planning Board may, as a condition of approval, require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds,of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By �ts
See attached authorization letter
m0e M )
YSi 4ure&A licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
Si seph C. trrenti, Esquire
—ougust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2915 AUG 21 A 11: 39
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FILE 4i
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERMrF CLERK. SALEH, t�Asc.
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map & Lot: map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLE
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State,Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State, Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. " I De�ic n in dingro�gedlot r1eaandfronta e for each lot:
Pro I tio c'
y Is_"_t,,_ tut e d 0
The prope�retc loca d a C a k Avenue and Clark avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres of open space.
The t�otal project site area is approximately I/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
- open Space 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. Ill. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer,Board
of Health, Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department, Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval, require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds,of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By its
avwle'12�7 See attached authorization letter
YSi na/ure&A licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
Si seph C. trrenti, Esquire
—ougust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
is 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
OJ
By: J
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2015 AUG 21 A It: 39
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FIL.c 0
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERNMY CLEI,'K, Se41EKHAS5,
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Promect Dmriiption includinwro5sedlot area and frontage for each lot:
s locatew at he c
The property i A ciarx avenue and Ciark Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, I undefined lot, and approximately I acres of open space.
The total project site area is approximately I/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
open Spa—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
im A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2-5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. Ill. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application withouta
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department, Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By(�ts
See attached authorization letter
(Si/na/ure U Atplicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
oseph C. Lorrenti, Esquire
ugust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
121 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
IL
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
CITY OF SALEM 2015 AUG 21 A 11: 3q
APPLICATION FOR FILE P
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PEI�fl*TCLEEK, S A L E M- m P,'S 5
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map & Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Pro-ect esc i tion incll inf lot area and frontage for each lot:
_LP-- _ Ld _pro�geL
The pr perty 3_�, locat�,d at he d or Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and Ypproximately 7 a-c-r—es--33T—open space.
The total project site area is approximately 17 acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
Open S�i-a—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements.
1. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. 111. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five (35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Police Department,Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By �ts
I
See attached authorization letter
YSi no/Ure&A I licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
os
oseph C. trenti, Esquire
u ug
gust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
I
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
CITY OF SALEM AUG 21 A 11: 38
APPLICATION FOR HUE #
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PEMTLEPV,. S4'LEM, �1ASSr
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map & Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLT
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
AddressIPO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. sedlot area and frontage for each lot:
Xro�ect Qelc I clion inc'"di f hero d 0
The pr perty 1 - 1 —ate-6 at - r Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and approximately / acres of open space.
The total pro]ect site area is approximately l/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
open Sp-a—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. 111. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer, Board
of Health, Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department, Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or reftising the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By lits
64 See attached authorization letter
(Si no/ure&Atplicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
oseph C. 'Correnti, Esquire
ugust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7- 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
is 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
.19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,398 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
.Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
CITY OF SALEM 2015 AUG 21 A 11: 38
APPLICATION FOR FILE -�t
CLUSTER RESEDENTL4,L DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PEMOT GLP'K, S;�LEN. IIASS
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map & Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Proec, esc�2tion inc'IaLdinf peroMsedlot area and frontage for each lot:
The pr erty ocatg t h d ot Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, I undetined lot, and approximately 7 acres of open space.
The Eotal pro]ect site area is appr-5-x-1-F-a-E-eIy`-17—acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
5�n—Space 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements.
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7-2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. Ill. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Police Department,Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By lits
See attached authorization letter
YS,una/ure&A I licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
os
o eph C. trenti, Esquire
u g
gust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
I
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
CIJ I C�
-�6 -40��
By: PC--
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
Z015 AUG 21 A 11: 38
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FILE #
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERkk GL1I'%K- SALEM, MASS,
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 63 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State, Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Pro'ect Desc i tion incl din��ro sedlot reaand n e each lot:
np__ -4-- -- 'ro Lr—
locat d at he d 0 C
The property is ii la �k !VyMe and C A Avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres of open space.
The total project site area is app`r-5—x-1F-aFe=y=acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
open Spa—ce 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
1. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. 111. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(3 5)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Police Department,Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval, require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
Btts
See attached authorization letter
IS Si nz/ure&A licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
i s trrenti, Esquire
ugust 26, 2015
: —
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
,18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
Crry OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2015 AUG 21 A 11: 38
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FILE #
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PE&IT'L"" S.4 LE K H A SS
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/0 Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: map 6, Parce Is 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Proec e c i lion incl din ro t grea#.frone for each lot:
SeW la k venue
p fip--�kd- o C- and Clark Aven
The pr,5 erty Is locat d at he ue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, I undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres of open space.
The otai pro]ect site area is approximately I/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
open Space 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. 111. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department,Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By �ts
1,�rx See attached authorization letter
YSi na/ure&A licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
oseph C. trrenti, Esquire
—Ugust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6�798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
Z015 AUG 21 A 11: 38
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FIL�c #
q�iLEM. MASS.
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PEIW1YrCLH'K,
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant; NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map & Lot: map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLF
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 63 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State, Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. 'ec n inclildiq�ronsedlot area and frontage for each lot:
he d
Pro t eLc"IM0 -
rt t at o
The pr pe�yL�s loca e f Clark avenue and Clarr avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, I undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres of open space.
The total project site area is approximately I/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
5�m—Space 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
1. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. Ill. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application, transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Police Department, Department
of Public Services,and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
B t S
See attached authorization letter
I (Y
7ofSi na/ure&A licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
S � trrenti, Esquire
ugust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,80S 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 7S.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
�0 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
C
By:
Barbara Driscoll
0
CITY OF SALEM
Ilk PLANNING BOARD
1,T�vwwm -111
2015 AUG 21 A 11: 38
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR F11 E 'Y
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAIEVMWITV�' SA 1111, M ASS.
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map & Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: Seraf ini, Darling & Correnti, LLE
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State, Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. 4ftf�sc tioan ing ladin to sedlot CreagriLfvrontage for each lot:
s�_ _ Im f� �k
The pr oc t�id t e d of gl �k g enue and Clark avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undeveloped and the Applicant
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and roximately 7 aF-res of-open space.
The total project site area is approximately 1/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
open S�pace 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
1 Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. 111. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws. Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Police Department,Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special pen-nit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By �.ts
6W"41X See attached authorization letter
(siona/ure&tlicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
oseph C. orrenti, Esquire
u u
gust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
18 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
C-� -�
By:
Barbara Driscoll
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
2015 AUG 21 A 11: 38
CITY OF SALEM
APPLICATION FOR FILE
CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIAIVtlk�ig' SALEM, MAS-.
PER SECTION 7.2
Location of Property: Applicant: NSD Realty Trust
/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire
Map& Lot: Map 6, Parcels 7,8 and 9 Address/PO Box: c Serafini, Darling a Correnti, LLI
Owner: Barbara Driscoll City, State, Zip Code: 6 3 Federal street
Salem, MA 01970
Address/PO Box: 18 Wallace Road Telephone: (978) 744-0212
City, State,Zip Code: Lynn, MA 01901
Telephone:
Applicant must submit a Definitive Subdivision Plan in conjunction with this application.
A. Aftl�Lc i 01cion incl adinthero seLl
ot greagn fvronta e for each lot:
s 1 atig 11t _p__�g or Cla 4K en g-
The pr e and Mark avenue Extension off of
Highland Avenue in Ward 3. The property is currently undevelopTd and the Applicant
- ---F-
seeks 26 residential lots, 1 undefined lot, and approximately 7 acres o open space.
The total project site area is approximately I/ acres.
See attached list of individual lot area and frontage.
Zoning district(s): R-1
Square footage of parcel: 750,538 s.f.
No. of Dwelling Units 26
Proposed Open Space area: Open Space 1: 168,388 s.f.
- open Space 2: 135,070 s.f.
B. Submission Requirements in addition to Definitive Subdivision Plan requirements:
I. A brief narrative that addresses Sec. 7.2.4 Standards and Sec. 7.2.5 Open Space of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Plan at appropriate scale that identifies the Open Space proposed for permanent protection and
proposed trail system.
3. Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Subdivision
Regulations.
C. III. Procedure:
The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said
application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer,Board
of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate
the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board
shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above
agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a
submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as
possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General
Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk, Police Department, Department
of Public Services, and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning
Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The
decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the
special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give
effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of
Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his
successor in title to alleviate the effects of same.
NSD Realty Trust
By(, ts See attached authorization letter
YS Si na/ure&A licant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable)
i
seph C. orrenti, Esquire
ougust 26, 2015
Date Date
FEE PAID:
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision - "The Woodlands" Proposed Lot Areas & Frontage Listing (Revised)
Lot No. Area (s.f.) Frontage (ft)
1 7,805 75.66
2 7,697 75.66
3 7,412 75.58
4 7,492 88.15
5 7,421 80.14
6 7,203 80.12
7 7,296 100.8
8 6,370 89.20
9 6,798 75.24
10 6,782 75.08
11 7,994 111.29
12 11,127 197.40 (Along Woodlands Road) 24.01 (Along Clark Avenue Extension)
13 9,147 117.52
14 12,433 86.15
15 12,973 72.35
16 10,245 80.67
17 8,233 78.10
is 8,516 76.46 (Along Woodlands Road) 89.23 (Along South Ridge Circle)
19 13,627 219.42
.20 14,709 61.76
21 9,404 84.44
22 7,630 65.21
23 8,251 64.46
24 12,636 73.53 (Along Woodlands Road) 79.48 (Along South Ridge Circle)
25 7,904 53.32
26 7,853 95.59
27 147,992 101.80
Open Space 1 168,388 N.A.
Open Space 2 135,070 N.A.
August 25, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
City of Salem
Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chairman Anderson:
Pleased be advised that 1, the owner of the properties referenced above
that comprise the Project Site, hereby authorize the proposed Cluster
Subdivision filing with the Planning Board, as well as all other permits necessary
to effectuate the subdivision of the Project Site by NSD Realty Trust.
B .6c
y:
Barbara Driscoll
'OrS
Q -a*n
ept, Of
12D W hal-wing�&Corj�n
Sa "17gton�-*�K 3 iiq#y'1)Bv81
SERAFINi, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLe�, ;4 -019,76 Zifloor, Opment�--
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTS FAC51MILE
978-741-4683
October 29, 2015
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Ben Anderson, Chairman
City of Salem Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 0 1970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan;
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit;
and Application for Stormwater Management
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chair Anderson:
On behalf of the Applicant, NSD Realty Trust, I hereby request allowance
to continue the hearing date for the above Applications until the Board's next
regularly scheduled meeting on November 19, 2015.
NSD Realty Trust
By its Attorney,
?sep Cq. rrenti
JCC:dl
cc: NSD Realty Trust
SERAFINi, DARLING & CORRENTi, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
978-741-4683
August 27, 2015
Ben Anderson, Chair
Salem Planning Board
120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
and Application for Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chair Anderson:
By Decision dated March 3, 2008, the Planning Board unanimously voted
to approve the application of Chapel Hill, LLC ("Prior Applicant") for the approval
of the Form C Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development
Special Permit ("Decision") for 25 residential lots, which Decision has since
expired (a copy of said Decision is attached hereto).
In accordance with Section 7.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, NSD
Realty Trust ("Applicant"), hereby makes application for a Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit to allow for 26 residential building lots, as well as a
Form C Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan. There is one lot for which the
characteristics have yet to be determined, for a total of 27 lots.
The primary difference between the proposed plan and previously
approved plan is the new roadway layout, which for grading and aesthetic
purposes has less impact to the existing Clark Avenue Extension residents.
As to the Open Space requirement under the Zoning Ordinance, the site is
currently in private ownership and is thus unavailable for public use and/or
recreational facilities. The 6.967 acres of the site to be preserved as open
August 27, 2015
Page Two
space, as shown on the plans submitted, will be available for access to the
residents of Salem. Sidewalks are proposed throughout the subdivision and a
trail system will be constructed on the north side of the site and connect to
adjacent land to the east owned by the City of Salem.
The plans, as filed together with the Environmental Impact Statement,
which serves as the narrative under the list of requests contained in the Definitive
Subdivision Plan requirements, give a comprehensive review of the project.
Wherefore, the Applicant, NSD Realty Trust, respectfully requests that the
Board grant the necessary relief to reflect the filing submitted herewith.
Sincerely,
NSD Realty Trust
y its Aft r
X
J s
JCC:dI S'ep Correnti
Enclosures
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
Oki) 3 P 3:
'Ary
March .3, 2CO8
Decision-Clark Avenue/Chapel Hill
Form C--Definitivc Subdivision and CAustcrResidcritial Development Special Permit
Chapel Hill,UC
532 Lowell Street
Peabody,NIA 0 1960
Re: Chapel Hill- Clark Avenue(NUp 6,Lots 7,8,9)
On November 1, 2007 the Planning Board of the City of Salem(hereinafter referred to as the
"Planning Board" or"the Board") opened a public hearing regarding the application of Chapel Fa
LLC(hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant"and/or"Owner ) to allow construction of the
Chapel Hill Subdivision and associated roadways and utilities. The subdivision contains twenty-five
(25) residential lots and one (1) lot zoned residential and industrial.
Though it is not a condition,it is the Planning Board's understanding that Lot 2 1,zoned residential
and industrial,cannot be developed as an industrial lot with the access from Clark Avenue through
the residentially zoned portion of the lot. This is based on the opinion of the Assistant City
Solicitor,dated October 15,2007.
It is important to note that the applications, which are the subject of this decision evolved from the
following:
1. A Form B-Preliminary Subdivision Plan Application, which was subrnitted to the Board
on January 4,2006 and for whicha decision was issued by the Board on April 21,2006.
'Me preliminary subdivision plan was a cluster,and this approval directed the Owner to
pursue a Cluster Residential Special Permit.
2. A Form CDefinitive Subdivision Plan and Cluster Residential Development Special
Permit Application to allow construction of the Chapel 1-0 Subdivision and associated
roadways and utilities to service the construction of thirty seven (37)single family
dwellings was submitted on July 17,2006 with plans dated June 28,2006. 'Me item was
opened at the Planning Board on September 21,2006 and the public hearing was
continUed to October 19,2006, November 17, 2006,December 7,2OC6,January 4,2CC7,
JanuirY 18,2007, Febmary 15,2CO7, March 15, 2C07,April 5,2C07,and June 21, 2CC7.
3. On June 21, 2CO7 the Planning Board voted to recommend approval for a Zoning
Ordinance Amendment to rezone eight parcels on Clark Avenue (Nbp 6, Parcels 4,6, 8,
9, 10, 13, 17,and 19) from Industrial to Residential One Family. The Cry Council
rezoned parcels 4,6, 10, 15, 17,and 19 but did not rezone parcels 8 and 9, whichare a
portion of the proposed Chapel HU Subdivision.
M'
4. A revised single cluster plan(revision dated June 11,2007) was suburritted on June 27,
2007 depicting 27 lots (accounting for the lots which were not rezoned). 'Me public
hearing was continued toluly 19,2007. The single cluster plan was further revised
(August 20,2007) to addadditional details and the public hearing was continued to
September 6,2007.
The initial application with all its revisions was voluntarily withdrawn %Nithout prejudice,
by the Applicant on October 9,2007 to rectify a potential issue of constructive approval
due to the action of the Board in April of 2007 with regard to continuance. A new
application was subritirted on October 9,2007,followed by revised plans (dated October
26,2007) which removed Jennifer Gircle. 11iis item was again opened at the Planning
Board on November 1,2007 and the public hearing was continued to December 6,2007,
December 20,2007,january 17,2008,February7,2008,and February 21,2008.
5. It is important to note that all written materials, information,studies,peer reviews and
any and all other correspondence involved in these applications were accepted as part of
the record for the applications for which this decision is issued.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 21,2008 the public hearing was closed
and the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor(Meo,Power,Collins,Ready,Kavanaugh,1-Imscom)
and none (0) opposed,to approve the Form GDefinitive Subdivision and Ouster Residential
Development Special Permit. Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of a Special
Permit have been met by the Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance to protect and promote the health,safety,convenience and general welfare of the
in-habitants; of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. 'Me Board finds that the
subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential development because it promotes the mom efficient
use of land in harmony with existing natural features. The Board recognized that the building lots created
and the buildings to be constructed thereon may have dimensional controls and density regulations
varying from those otherwise permitted by the ordinance or by-law and the approvals are subject to the
following conditions and waivers and/or relief-
1. Cortformance with the Plan
Work shall conform with the plans entitled,"Definitive Subdivision Plan Chapel Hill Salem
NUssachusetts",prepared by Eastern LAnd Survey Associates, Inc., 104 Lowell Street,Peabody,
MA,01960,dated June 28,2006,and revised June 11,2007,August 20, 2007 and October 26,
2007.
2. Endorsement of the Plans
Following the statutory twenty(20) day appeal period,the Planning Board will endorse the
original subdivision plans,subject to conditions of this decision, which shall be recorded at the
South Essex Registry of Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the plans,the following items must be
submitted for approval by the Planning Board:
a. A Covenant to secure the construction of ways and instaLlation of municipal services,
including required description of mortgages and assents of mortgagees.
b. Acceptable formof grants of easements, ifapplicable.
c. "is decision shall be referenced on the original plans prior to the endorsement by
tire Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the Southern
Essex Registry of Deeds.
3, Ainendments
Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the Planning Board
unless deemed irisioficant by the Cry Planner. Any waiver of conditions contained within this
decision shall require the approval of the Planning Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
The Subdivision shjU be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations and anyother applicable regulations as affected by this decision.
In approving the Plans,the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations:
a. Section IV A.Lf Minimum Center Line Riid�of Curved Streets is waived to allow
construction and operations of the streets and ways as shown on the Plans;this waiver is
being granted based on a recommendation from the consulting engineer that this does not
negatively impact safety or vehicular circulation.
b. ft1ktj�Y,$_4, C'Stme ts:4 w;u' the.,
th of,Ve y, �bos.W,,��
In the ju*dgnwnt of the Board,the granting of the above waivers is in die public interest and
consistent with the intent of the subdivision control law.
6. Tmnsfer of Ownership
Within five days of transfer of ownership of the subdivision,the Owner shall notify the Board in
writing of the new owner's name and address. T'his shall not include the sale of lots within the
subdivision in the ordinary course of business,but only a sale of the entire subdivision. The
terms,conditions, restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the
Owner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Security(Section III(B)(5) of the Subdivision Regulations)
Prior to the release of any lots for sale or building,the Planning Board shaU require that in
W4,j tcd a ed* re ase
Wagwi'41i a pmposg of moapV. If partial le
tr
-YMT�Nequesied" " P1
6"s U"Mt�T ,t e irditnIfFNid'inSy,at its iscretion, require deposits to be
broken down in amounts of anticipated requests for release.The appficant agrees to complete
the required improvements in accordance with Section V of the Subdivision Regulations for the
subdivision. Such construction and instaUation is to be secured by one and/or in part by the
other of the following methods which may from time to time be varied by the applicant with the
reasonable approval of the Planning Board:
a. Endorscmentof approval with covenant
The Owner shall file a covenant,prior to endorsement by the Planning Board,executed
and to be duly recorded with the Subdivision Plans byth�ownerof record, which
instrument shall with the land, and shall state chat such wa)3 and services shown on the
3
approved plans shall be provided to serve anyand ad lots before my lot may be built
upon L)r conve%ed,other thin by mortgage deed;and/or
b. Endorsement of approval with bonds,surety ortri-party agreement
The Owner shall either file a perfortnance bond,a deposit of money or negotiable
securities,or a Eri-parryagreement in anamount determined by the Board to be sufficient
to cover the cost of ad or any one phase of the 56-division of the improvements.Surety,
if filed or deposited,shall be approved as to form and manner of execution by the Gry
Solicitor and,as to sureties by the CIty Treasurer,and shall be contingent on the
construction of the roadway through binder course. 't'W''s ' -sw"be I
'_, dea)
mmumd ' '.4 R'S* �E,
k6a a'- 'P e re ase 0 surety.
N5,
I
am 04�
'Me Owner may file A covenant to secure the construction of ways and services for the
entire sub-division and said covenant may be partially released for phases of the sub-
division by bond,surety or tri-purry agreement being filed for any phase or phases of the
subdivision by execution of a recordable instrument so stating by the Planning Board.
c. Timeframe
a 9"o s!1'� a NINO,"'!Won
to S9
ur
Planning Board. or ticW�
V.M, wft -& �
.0irr4o e us,oclatl
�9 i
a. Drift �OAO'�W-qa be
Documd, -0
to
subrni' to e Departmentof Planning and GommunityDevelopment,for
reasonable review as to form and content prior to the issuance of any Gertificates of
Occupancy for the proposed dwellings. These documents shall include the following
responsibilities:
do
to
b. The Gty of Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Flomeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
Open Space is shown on the Plans and consisting of approximately 3.875 acres shall be
perpetually preserved as open space. The Open Space shad be placed in a corporation or trust
owned or to be owned by the owners of lots within the subdivision with provisions for"ted
easements for recreational use by residents of the Gry of Salem; provided that such ownership
shall Ve5t in the Board sufficient rights to enforce compliance with restrictions imposed by the
Board as a condition of its Cluster Special Permit. The easement documents shall allow for
4
passive,non-motorized recreation and shall empower the Cityat its discretion,to make
improvements to the trad system.
-Me open spice shall be opened for pubfiC use upon the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the final dwelling orat such in earlier time as mutually agreed to by(he applicant
and the Board.
10. Salem Conservation Commission
onditiqV.s#64
men -434 issttedp
-ts, of Order of C
:��xhc Salem Conservation Commission.
b. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work.
It. Trails
Prior to the release of the final Certificate of Occupancy,the trad for the open space will be laid
out,flagged and completed by the Owner. Traa segments will be cleared by manual cutting of
brush and tree saplings to facilitate passage. All rruterials cut or cleared shall be chipped and left
in place. No earthmoving,grading or mowing will occur. Small brush will be cut and dispersed
into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles or mechanical equipment
(other than chippers,clippers,loppers,and sma.11 chain saws for the clearing) will be employed.
12.Trail Signage
Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the trailheads. Sign design and
proposed location shall be submitted for approval to the City Planner prior to installation.
Standard trail marking metal tags,used by the Gonservation Commission,shall be placed on
trees at eye height,and where trees are not present,on wooden posts or stakes at least three (3)
feet high along the trail at appropriate intervals.
(Prog o
w
er%pte
f9ot s
com p lered
e
of ny ce
to 's�
m
tc�the
2�
pp
85in er pnor Isuart flow
And clischargir�g to the 1-fighland Avenue e
rogri a be pe4orme st
msh a d in nct com I flow
AnAyses and Sewer S y3tem E valuation S
commence without first meeting with the Ci ngincer to review the scope of work All reports
And summaries of work completed shall be reviewed by the Cry Engineer prior to the start of the
next phase of work starting(phases are oudined in the Guidelines).
Applif�xot w 4)
reinove A emarw6ji ste -to remove up to
amount of flow removed shall not be less than
A*01&t���ubclivision.
MInfrastructum Improvements
a. The applicant shall complete drainage improvementS At the intersection of Clark Street
and Clark Avenue as depicted on the plan entitled"Clark Street Drainage
Improvements",dated "January9,2008", revised February 13,2008. Thedrainage
improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Cry Engineer,including
5
temporary pavement of the trenches, within 30-days of work starting on the proposed
subdivision site. In any event,no budding permits will be issued prior to completion
-ing shall remain and be rruintained
of these drainage improvements. Temporary pjN
-ision is determined to be substantially
by the applicant,until the proposed subdi%
complete by the Gry Engineer,,"
,TA,w6.
pavcjiwnt replacement p I o,&wjng
Stiret/Clark Avenue Intersection: 2411feet easeerly,6" PwJi-Afld 30 fe96
westerly towards lighland Avenue.
replocemrit,;p 4POW to clakSwet S44%:QRi$t 4,
an Ue
jrid�'�rroviag no lesi ni-;;Ns offi=4-AtM t
g vemen,.Trom
rep�W- vwa with 2-:Mches(g'mm-if
too'
to%
promomoormwater conveyance to the newly installed and e3dstin drainaw
owCark$treet and.not cawle!anaXisswe,-vjib�t=dqolg cing, y , agm
h driveways The vement
—eer,, r
co r tal
V te
i)v 6ty ;IM7
O*Uaha�f�;Ycer4fijcaves of occupancy. I
c. On C —A 'c'
al tabim&apvi��t� 4 Mc 41!. jW=
c' �",menq this shall occur when the subdivision is,
2 =f nwj.
de,6med to be substantiallyco " te bythe Gry Engineer.
d. If deemed necessary,prior to beginning drainage improvement work the applicant
shall file a Request for Determination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation
Corrunission and a Notice of Intent.
15. Safety Improvements
The following safety improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificates
of occupancy.
a. Following a recommendation from the Traffic impact Assessment prepared by
Abend Associates,4*�;Ar nd striping
,�P!ant has agree&voluptarily to roviticsiggagea
at the intersecdonso"f 'icreetsintheneighborho 171,13rig a recommendation
from the Peer Review Engineer,the applicant has ;also agreed to paint a center line on
a portion of existing Clark Avenue to guide motorists through the bend.
and�sigpW s hall be ins ulled as s hown on*e�*Tmf fic.1.MYjRx4 ment Pla 2PAWW
Febti-Wi!�13,2009,prepamdbyEastemL-Z2ru��yAssociates.
b. The ap licant has agreed to'[Point a crosswalk which will lead from the end of the j
southwesterly side of Clark 'Ve U h continues ro dj�,i%7
,M;pq9q,,with CL*
c. T MICA ra c
_4&&W.hc�t has agreed to install v i I urb' extsung,
61tumiWus,concrere'sidewalkAt the northe -en end of
the exist, bw
granitecur in ��Cp
ul
A";:;&GMMt- j'pohel!�nts a Iffaluloo,repairt e Mrae 'nee
6
near the
d. ev applicant%vill p rch-joe EWA�the�e-x�t 11
_4L_ALA F Agg
se�t n ojq&#RA
--i'Yetign 0 venue. e"Pe 0 nurrora its ;OX
-sythe GtYs Police Safety Offib
e. Tlw applicant shall contribute $5,000 to the City to be used for the rernovall of a
I
Certain cock and realigning the fence impeding sight distance on(lark Ayenue.
f. if4vline of sight easement is granted-to the Oty by the Property owirer of 1 (14 A
Avorw, the app'licani—staff—pr—epa"mapMn—'showing the easermirt area to accorypAny
ejgo�nenrdw nis prepared by the Gty Solicitor's(Ifice.
:A�tAdditional Special Conditions I
a. Sprinklers are to be designed and installed in accordance with NFPA 13D standards
for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Ctie and Two Family Dwellings and
Manufactured homes as required by the Salem Fire Department.
b. Retaining waI6 shall be constructed in compliance with the Massachusetts State
Building Gode CvIR780.
c.�e;;Thx,following fences shall be shown on dwplans prior to endoillerrient-and instfed
prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy
i. A four(4) foot tail black chain"fence is to be installed on the top of thq
-KAsipe/retairring wall on Lots 2 through 8 and Lots IS through 20.j,
ii� A six foot tall wood stockade fence is to be,installeomadw�pixrpeny-of I-Y
(U Avenue on two sides:the side tielarest to the subdivision entrance,aaO
tbe.,tear. 'nre fence would be'&rjj'�biarses S56-3 I-OOW 130 fein�;ad Vj-
ff.MT34.47 feel.
iii. A four foot tall slarted c6in"fence,shall be�iin'tall'ed-at the back of th%,
sidewalk secan of the retaining wall in the layout of Avenue (ad)ace t
to 42�L Clark�Av n The fence will be installed fromSt4tionO-+93 207
O:em fe
I + "'fO'keCn'Ft.w1
rig on I +
d. When the roadway into the subdivision is constructed,&U., ipes,removed
f 24.4 ivcm Man* if) a
row of arborvitae along the edge o ve" le amewaii�410 a
ne
bwk of the existing row,or the s w trees.of the,s ies and j
E only,be
height shall be plarued,ar-ft-bRIEW die, row, This work w
Uf t
provided permission 4 granted ERA A�W! ;rk e ec on
by t Zi�—fo :i , 'Q Avenue-*th ex u I
of a-rti I lease of liability 6 granted to theapplicant and executed bythe owner of 21
(lark Avenue. Any new trees planted shall be at least the height of the shortest tree
in the row and no taller than the tallest tree. The developer shall guarantee the
survival of the trees fora period of one)rjr.
e. Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy three(3) boulders i%ifl be added
to the City Conservation land at the end of Clark Avenue t'8'rR-Q'hVOP-.ige if
agreed upon by the Salem Conservation Commission.
t
7
17. Sidewalks
The applicant shall install bituminous concrete sidewalks Mth vertical granite curbing
throughout the subdivision,according to the approved plans. Prior to endorsement the plans
shall be revised to remove details of sloped granite.
The species of street trees depicted on Sheets#5 and 1).of the plans is to be determined by the
0 rof Public Services and be a minimurnof 3 1h caliper DBH(diamecerat breast
a. The Owner shall coordinate with the electric cofnpany and the City E Ie%W—
,an
regardin the ' I street lighting within the Subdivision.
b. i hting shall be the responsibility of the Owner until such time askhe Cry
Accepts the Areets.
c. Ioxnal lighting plan shad be submitted to the City Planner and the City Electfician
0"view and appwy4lprior to the issuance of any budding permits for thq
proposed dwelling units. )
20. Office of the Building Conunissioner
All work shall comply with the requirements of the office of the Salem Budding Commissioner
as affected by this decision.
21.Office of the City Engineer
The applicant,his successors or assigns shall comply with ad requirements of the City Engineer
22. Fire Department
Ali work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department as affected by this
decision.
23. Health Department
All work shall comply with the general requirements of the Salem Health Department as affected
by this decision.
24. Board of Health(BOH)
'Me Owner shall comply with the following specific conditions issued by the Board of Health:
a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health
Agent of the name,address,and telephone number of the project(site) manager who
will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project.
b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan,no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site
Professional responsible for the site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use.
c. A radon remediation kit is installed and is operational in each dwelling. I
d. A radon testis conducted following installationand oy f he dijtion ki.
,.jJFn o t rerne
m
--Me results musvbe�i*ifff purcn--- 9.
8
L
e. T'he developer will give the I*alth Agent A copyq,tIhe, 21-E report..
f. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer,
g. -Me Developer shall emplo'v a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area
prior to construction,demolition,and/or blasting and shag send a copy of the
exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent.
It. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
i. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a wTitten plan for dust control and
street sweeping which will occur during construction.
j. 'Me developer shag submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and
removal of debris,vegetative waste,and unacceptable excavation material generated
during demolition and/or construction.
k. 'Me Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting.
1. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including
but not United to refrigeration and heating,shag not increase the broadband sound
level by more than 10 cLB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line.
m. *Me developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill
material needed for the project.
n. The resultant establishment shall dispose of all waste materials resialting from its
operation in an environmentally sound manner as described by the Board of health.
o. The.drainage system for this pr6ject,wWj wro and ap roved by the
4f,
Northe-ot MosqL4to Control and s�&Igernent . f-/
p. 'Me developer shag notify the Fkalth Agent when the project is complete for final
inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met.
25. Pre-Construction Conference
Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivision,a pre-construction conference shall be
scheduled with the Gry Planner, the Gry Engineer(or his designee),the Budding Corrunissioner,
the Health Agent,and anyother departments that may be necessary. The Owner shall submit a
construction schedule at the time of the pre-construction conference.
26. Construction Practices
,-U construction shag be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
a. The operation of tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work shall
occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 77-2 (5): Construction an
Blastin and bem-cen the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM on weekdays and
Saturdays. No work shall take place on Sundays or holidays. The Planning Board
9
wiflagree to changes in the starting time,at the request of the applicant and if
approved by a forryul vote of the City CA)uncil,as per the ordinance.
b. Any blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering,hydraulic blasting,or pile driving shall
occur in accordance with Salem ordinance Section 72-2 (5): Construction and
Bla-sting and be United to MondayFriday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5.00
PM. There shall be no blasting,rock cnashing,jack hammering,hydr'auhc blasting,
or pde driving on Saturdays,Sundays,or holidays.
c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations.
d. All reasonable action shad be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction
on abutters. Advance notice shad be provided by the applicant to All abutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project.
e. All construction vehicles and equipment shad be cleaned prior to leaving the site so
that they do not leave din and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the
site.
f. The applicant shad abide by any and ad applicable rules,regulations and ordinances
of the City of Salem.
g. Ali construction vehicles and equipment left overnight-at the site must be located
completely on the site.
h. No Street shad be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and
Gomarrunity Development,unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police
Department.
27. Blasting
The applicant or argent shad distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for Massachusetts Property
Owners About Blasting" to ad abutters within three hundred(300) feet of the blasting area.
28. Construction Traiffic
a. With the exception of off-sitc improvements required as part of this decision, ad
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within Gty
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning&CorturtuniEy Development prior to construction.
b. A constnx'n-traffic rnanagement planand schedule shall be submitted to the
VR,;r,t,n-x"n't of Planning&Cornmunity,Development for review and Approval pric!r,
to the Start Of COnStrUCtiO1L t
c. Any roadways,driveways,or sidewalks darruged during construction shall be
resiored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. The O%mer shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site,
and clean and sn-cep ad streets af fected by their construction truck traffic as
necessary.
10
29. Progress Reports
Upon the request of the Planning Board, the o%Amer shall submit reports of the prog"?ff�®rff 3 P 3: Q 3
iubdivision's completion.
X CkA of the Works I CI I Y ,L E
7he services of a consultant to serve as a Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the Gryat the
expense of the applicant,his successors orassigns as is deemed necessary by the City Planner.
31.Utilities
Any utflity instaflation for housing lots shall be rrviewed and approved by the City Engineer
prior to the issuance of a Budding Permit.All utilities shall be installed underground.
32. As-built Plans &Street Acceptance Plans
As-bat plans and Street Acceptance Plans,stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer,shall
be subinitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Dep'Artment of
Public Services prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision
and/or the acceptance of any streets.
'Me As-Bat plans shall be submitted to the Cry Engineer in electronic file format suitable for
the Grys use and approved bythe Gry Engineer,prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of
Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of anystreets.
A completed tie card,a blank copy(avadable at the Engineering Department) and A certification
signed and stamped by the design engineer,stating that the work was completed in substantial
compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets;as well as,any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer.
33. Violations
Violarionsof any condition shall resultin revocationof this permit by the Planning Board,
unless the violadon of such condition is cured within fourteen (14)days,or waived bya majority
vote of the Planning Board.
I certify thata copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on
file with the Board. The decision shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the
certification of the Cry Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been fled or that
if such appeal has been filed,and it has been dismissed or denied,is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the
Owners Certificate of Title if Registered Lind. The o%ner or applicant, his successors or assigns,
shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Clil"4/AL
Charles Puleo
Chairaun
March 3, 2008
Decision-Clark Avenue/Chapel Hill
Form C-Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Chapel Hill,LLC
532 Lowell Street
Peabody,MA 01960
Re: Chapel Hill-Clark Avenue (Map 6,Lots 7, 8,9)
On November 1,2007 the Planning Board of the City of Salem (hereinafter referred to as the
"Planning Board" or"the Board") opened a public hearing regarding the application of Chapel Hill
LLC (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant" and/or"Owner") to allow construction of the
Chapel Hill Subdivision and associated roadways and utilities. The subdivision contains twenry-five
(25) residential lots and one (1) lot zoned residential and industrial.
Though it is not a condition,it is the Planning Board's understanding that Lot 21, zoned residential
and industrial, cannot be developed as an industrial lot with the access from Clark Avenue through
the residentially zoned portion of the lot. This is based on the opinion of the Assistant City
Solicitor,dated October 15, 2007.
It is important to note that the applications,which are the subject of this decision evolved from the
following:
1. A Form B-Preliminary Subdivision Plan Application,which was submitted to the Board
on January 4, 2006 and for which a decision was issued by the Board on April 21,2006.
The preliminary subdivision plan was a cluster, and this approval directed the Owner to
pursue a Cluster Residential Special Permit.
2. A Form C-Defirutive Subdivision Plan and Cluster Residential Development Special
Permit Application to allow construction of the Chapel Hill Subdivision and associated
roadways and utilities to service the construction of thirty seven (37) single family
dwellings was submitted on July 27, 2006 with plans dated June 28, 2006. Theiternwas
opened at the Planning Board on September 21, 2006 and the public hearing was
continued to October 19, 2006, November 17,2006, December 7,2006,January 4, 2007,
January 18,2007, February 15,2007,March 15, 2007,April 5,2007, and June 21, 2007.
3. On June 21, 2007 the Planning Board voted to recommend approval for a Zoning
Ordinance Amendment to rezone eight parcels on Clark Avenue (Map 6,Parcels 4, 6, 8,
9, 10, 15, 17,and 19) from Industrial to Residential One Family. The City Council
rezoned parcels 4, 6, 10, 15, 17,and 19 but did not rezone parcels 8 and 9,which are a
portion of the proposed Chapel Hill Subdivision.
4. A revised single cluster plan (revision dated June 11, 2007) was submitted on June 27,
2007 depicting 27 lots (accounting for the lots which were not rezoned). The public
hearing was continued to July 19, 2007. The single cluster plan was further revised
(August 20, 2007) to add additional details and the public hearing was continued to
September 6, 2007.
The initial application with all its revisions was voluntarily withdrawn without prejudice,
by the Applicant on October 9,2007 to rectify a potential issue of constructive approval
due to the action of the Board in April of 2007 with regard to continuance. A new
application was submitted on October 9,2007, followed by revised plans (dated October
26,2007) which removed Jennifer Circle. This item was again opened at the Planning
Board on November 1, 2007 and the public hearing was continued to December 6, 2007,
December 20,2007,january 17,2008, February 7,2008, and February 21, 2008.
5. It is important to note that all written materials,information, studies,peer reviews and
any and all other correspondence involved in these applications were accepted as part of
the record for the applications for which this decision is issued.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 21, 2008 the public hearing was closed
and the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor (Puleo,Power,Collins,Ready,Kavanaugh,Hanscom)
and none (0) opposed, to approve the Form C-Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit. Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of a Special
Perrr�t have been met by the Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
Zorring Ordinance to protect and promote the health, safety,convenience and general welfare of the
inhabitants of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. The Board finds that the
subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential development because it promotes the more efficient
use of land in harmony with existing natural features. The Board recognized that the building lots created
and the buildings to be constructed thereon may have dimensional controls and density regulations
varying from those otherwise permitted by the ordinance or by-law and the approvals are subject to the
following conditions and waivers and/or relief:
1. Conformance with the Plan
Work shall conform with the plans entitled,"Definitive Subdivision Plan Chapel Hill Salem
Massachusetts",prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc., 104 Lowell Street,Peabody,
MA,01960, dated June 28,2006, and revised June 11, 2007,August 20, 2007 and October 26,
2007.
2. Endorsement of the Plans
Following the statutory twenty (20) day appeal period, the Planning Board Will endorse the
original subdivision plans,subject to conditions of this decision,which shall be recorded at the
South Essex Registry of Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the plans, the following items must be
submitted for approval by the Planning Board:
a. A Covenant to secure the construction of ways and installation of municipal services,
including required description of mortgages and assents of mortgagees.
b. Acceptable form of grants of easements,if applicable.
2
c. This decision shall be referenced on the original plans prior to the endorsement by
the Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the Southern
Essex Registry of Deeds.
3. Amendments
Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the Planning Board
unless deemed insignificant by the City Planner. Any waiver of conditions contained within this
decision shall require the approval of the Planning Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
The Subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations and any other applicable regulations as affected by this decision.
5. Waivers
In approving the Plans, the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations:
OSection IV A.Lf Minimum Center Line Radii of Curved Streets is waived to allow
construction and operations of the streets and ways as shown on the Plans; this waiver is
being granted based on a recommendation from the consulting engineer that this does not
Dnegatively impact safety or vehicular circulation.
bection IV AA.a. Maximum Length of Dead-end Streets is waived based on the
requirement for installation of sprinkler systems in the dwellings.
In the judgment of the Board, the granting of the above waivers is in the public interest and
consistent with the intent of the subdivision control law.
6. Transfer of Ownership
Within five days of transfer of ownership of the subdivision, the Owner shall notify the Board in
writing of the new owner's name and address. This shall not include the sale of lots within the
subdivision in the ordinary course of business, but only a sale of the entire subdivision. The
terms, conditions,restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the
Owner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Security (Section III(B)(5) of the Subdivision Regulations)
Prior to the release of any lots for sale or building, the Planning Board shall require that an
acceptable form of surety is posted along with a proposed schedule of releases. If partial release
of suret-%,is to be requested, the Planning Board may,at its discretion,require deposits to be
broken down in amounts of anticipated requests for release. The applicant agrees to complete
the required improvements in accordance with Section V of the Subdivision Regulations for the
subdivision. Such construction and installation is to be secured by one and/or in part by the
other of the following methods which may from time to time be varied by the applicant with the
reasonable approval of the Planning Board:
a. Endorsement of approval with covenant
The Owner shall file a covenant, prior to endorsement by the Planning Board, executed
and to be duly recorded with the Subdivision Plans by the owner of record,which
instrument shall with the land,and shall state that such ways and services shown on the
3
approved plans shall be provided to serve any and all lots before any lot may be built
upon or conveyed,other than by mortgage deed;and/or
b. Endorsement of approval with bonds, surety or tri-party agreement
The Owner shall either file a performance bond, a deposit of money or negotiable
securities, or a tri-parry agreement in an amount determined by the Board to be sufficient
to cover the cost of all or any one phase of the sub-division of the improvements. Surety,
if filed or deposited, shall be approved as to form and manner of execution by the City
Solicitor and, as to sureties by the City Treasurer, and shall be contingent on the
construction of the roadway through binder course. The amount of the surety shall be
reasonably determined by the City of Salem Engineering Department and Shan include an
additional 10% to cover the cost of inflation or maintenance for eighteen (18) months
after completion of the phase and release of surety.
The Owner may file a covenant to secure the construction of ways and services for the
entire sub-division and said covenant may be partially released for phases of the sub-
division by bond, surety or tri-party agreement being filed for any phase or phases of the
subdivision by execution of a recordable instrument so stating by the Planning Board.
c. Tirneframe
The construction of all ways and the installation of all required municipal services shall be
completed within 18 months from the date of receipt of bond or surety by the Board or
within two years of the date of approval of the Definitive Plan,whichever is earlier.
FaAure to do so shall automatically rescind approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Board.
8. Homeowner's Association
a. Draft Home Owners Association or Home Owner's Trust Documents Shan be
submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development, for
reasonable review as to form and content prior to the issuance of any Certificates of
Occupancy for the proposed dwellings. These documents shall include the following
responsibilities:
i. Ownership and/or maintenance of the storm water management system;
ii. Ownership and/or maintenance of the trail system and open space
iii. Ownership and/or maintenance of any walls located in the subdivision that
are not situated on the lots in the sub-division.
b. The City of Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Homeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
Open Space as shown on the Plans and consisting of approximately 3.875 acres shall be
perpetually preserved as open space. The Open Space shall be placed in a corporation or trust
owned or to be owned by the owners of lots xithin the subdivision with provisions for limited
easements for recreational use by residents of the City of Salem;provided that such ownership
shall vest in the Board sufficient rights to enforce compliance with restrictions imposed by the
Board as a condition of its Cluster Special Permit. The easement documents shall allow for
4
assive, noh-motorized recreation and shall empower the City at its discretion, to make
improvements to the trail system.
The open space shall be opened for public use upon the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the final dwelling or at such an earlier time as mutually agreed to by the applicant
and the Board.
10. Salem Conservation Commission
a. All work shall comply with the requirements of Order of Conditions #64-434 issued
by the Salem Conservation Commission.
b. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work.
11. Traits
Prior to the release of the final Certificate of Occupancy, the trail for the open space Will be laid
out, flagged and completed by the Owner. Trail segments will be cleared by manual cutting of
brush and tree saplings to facilitate passage. All materials cut or cleared shall be chipped and left
in place. No earthmoving,grading or mowingwill occur. Small brush will be cut and dispersed
into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles or mechanical equipment
(o ther than chippers, clippers,loppers, and small chain saws for the clearing) will be employed.
112.Trail Signage
2
S,
Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the trailheads. Sign design and
p I
roposed location shall be submitted for approval to the City Planner prior to installation.
n
Standard trail marking metal tags,used by the Conservation Commission, shall be placed on
t
trees at eye height,and where trees are not present,on wooden posts or stakes at least three (3)
f, t
14) feet high along the trail at appropriate intervals.
)a
QaVe -�Ak go
ewer - ,- - "�f -k ��Okot
e --3e- 0 -Ifj e"cl
rtonn an infiltration an in ow i entificauLu'C" i'�'! (-i
he applicant shall pe 1 1W R% d 0- Vion and removal program f0i the
approximate 2,700 linear foot sewer system to which the proposed subdivision shall discharge
sewage. The program shall be completed and flows removed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy. All 12i2es collecting s!LIY�Vflow
and dis program. The
program shall be performed in strict compliance with the latest Guidelines for In filtration/In flow
Analyses and Sewer System Evaluation Survey,Revised January, 1993. No such work shall
commence xithout first meeting with the City Engineer to review the scope.of work. All reports
and summaries of work completed shall be reviewed by the City Engineer prior to thestart of the
next phase of work starting (phases are outlined in the Guidelines). It is expected that the
applicant will remove all extraneous infiltration and inflow that is cost effective to remove up to
v/) an amount not to exceed a cost of$100,000. The amount of flow removed shall not be less than
the amount of flow to be added by the proposed subdivision.
nfrastructure Improvements
C-V a. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark Street
and ClarkAvenue as depicted on the plan entitled"Clark Street Drainage
Improvements", dated "January 9, 2008",revised Februa-r-y-113, 2008. The drainage
improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,including
5
temporary pavement of the trenches,within 30-days of work starting on the proposed
subdivision site. In any event, no budding perrmts will be issued prior to K:ompletion
of these drainage improvements. Temporary paving shall remain and be maintained
by the applicant,until the proposed subdivision is determined to be substantially
complete by the City Engineer,at w1rich time the applicant shall provide a full'Aridth
pavement replacement program to the following limits from the center of the Clark
Street/Clark Avenue Intersection: 240 feet easterly towards Barnes Road, and 30 feet
westerly towards Highland Avenue.
b. The pavement replacement program applied to Clark Street shall consist of grinding
and removing no less than 4 inches of the exis6ng pavement, from curb to curb,and
replacement with 2-inches (or more if necessary) of binder and 2-inches of top
pavement mix approved by the City Engineer. Final grading of the top mix shall
promote stormwater conveyance to the newly installed and existing drainage facilities
on Clark Street and not cause any issues with existing driveways. The pavement
replacement program must be completed and approved by the City Engineer prior to
the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.
c. On Clark Avenue from the Clark Street/Clark Avenue intersection southerly to the
existing vertical granite curbing, the applicant has agreed to patch all deficiencies and
overlay with 2-inches of new pavement. 'flus shall occur when the subdivision is
deemed to be substantially complete by the City Engineer.
d. If deemed necessary,prior to beginning drainage improvement work the applicant
shall file a Request for Deteratination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation
Comrnission and a Notice of Intent.
15. Safety Improvements
The follo\ving safety improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificates
of occupancy:
a. Following a recommendation from the Traffic Impact Assessment repared by
Abend Associates, the applicant has agre luntardy to provide signage and striping
at the intersections of all streets in the neighborhood. Follo-,"ring a recommendation
from the Peer Review Engineer,the applicant has also agreed to paint a center line on
a portion of existing Clark Avenue to guide motorists through the bend. The striping
and signage shall be installed as shown on the "Traffic Improvement Plan", dated
February 13, 2008,prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates.
�x 11,
b. The applicant has agreed to paint a crosswalk which will lead from the end of the
sidewalk on the northeasterly side of Clark Avenue to the sidewalk on the
southwesterly side of Clark Avenue (which con,tinues to the intersection with Clark
Street). The exact location shall be approved by the City's Police Safety Officer.
c. The applicant has agreed to install vertical granite curbing along the existing
bituminous concrete sidewalk at the northerly end of Clark Avenue from the end of
the existing granite curbing on Clark Avenue northerly to the intersection of Clark
Avenue and Clark Street; the applicant shall also repair the sidewalk as needed.
6
d. The a phcant will purchase and mount a mirror on the existing utility pole near the
P
bend on the existing section of Clark Avenue. The type of mirror and its location
must be approved by the City's Police Safety Officer.
e. The applicant shah contribute$5,000 to the City to be used for the removal of a
certain rock and realigning the fence impeding sight distance on Clark Avenue.
f, If a line of sight easement is granted to the City by the property owneNI"ClaPF) 1t(41e1CQL
Avenue, the applicant shall prepare a plan showing the easement area to accompany
easement documents prepared by the City Solicitor's Office.
16.Additional Special Conditions
a. Sprinklers are to be designed and installed in accordance with NFPA 13D standards
for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One and Two Family Dwellings and
Manufactured homes as required by the Salem Fire Department.
b. Retaining walls shall be constructed in compliance with the Massachusetts State
Building Code CMR780.
c. The following fences shall be shown on the plans prior to endorsement and installed
prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy:
i. A four (4) foot tall black chain fink fence is to be installed on the top of the
slope/retaining wall on Lots 2 through 8 and Lots 18 through 20.
ii. A six foot tall wood stockade fence is to be installed on the property of 13
Clark Avenue on two sides: the side nearest to the subdivision entrance, and
the rear. The fence would be along courses S56-31-OOW 130 feet,and S33-
29-OOE 134.47 feet.
iii. A four foot tall slatted chain link fence shall be installed at the back of the
sidewalk section of the retaining wall in the layout of Clark Avenue (adjacent
to 21 Clark Avenue). The fence will be installed from Station 0 +93 20 fer
right to Station 1 +84 20 feet right.
d. When the roadway into the subdivision is constructed,all trees removed from the
row of arborvitae along the edge of 21 Clark Avenue are to be transplanted to the
back of the existing row,or the same number of new trees of the same species and
height shall be planted at the back of the existing row. This work will only be done
provided permission is granted by the owner of 21 Clark Avenue and the execution
of a release of liability is granted to the applicant and executed by the owner of 21
Clark Avenue. Any new trees planted shall be at least the height of the shortest tree
in the row and no taller than the tallest tree. The developer shall guarantee the
survival of the trees for a period of one year.
Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy three (3) boulders will be added
to the City Conservation land at the end of Clark Avenue to prevent passage if
agreed upon by the Salem Conservation Commission,
7
17. Sidewalks
The applicant shall install bituminous concrete sidewalks with vertical granite curbing
throughout the subdivision, according to the approved plans. Prior to endorsement the plans
shall be revised to remove details of sloped granite.
18. Street Trees
The species of street trees depicted on Sheets #5 and 13 of the plans is to be determined by the
City's Director of Public Services and be a minimum of 3 '/2caliper DBH (diameter at breast
height).
19. Lighting
a. The Owner shall coordinate with the electric company and the City Electrician
regarding the installation of street lighting withm the Subdivision.
b. The street lighting shall be the responsibility of the Owner until such time as the City
accepts the streets.
c. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner and the City Electrician
for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits for the
proposed dwelling units.
20. Office of the Building Commissioner
All work shall comply with the requirements of the office of the Salem Building Commissioner
as affected by this decision.
21.Office of the City Engineer
The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer
22. Fire Department
All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department as affected by this
decision.
23. Health Department
All work shall comply with the general requirements of the Salem Health Department as affected
by this decision.
24. Board of Health (BOH)
The Owner shall comply with the following specific conditions issued by the Board of Health:
a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health
Agent of the name, address,and telephone number of the project (site) manager who
will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project.
b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan, no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site
Professional responsible for the site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use.
c. A radon remediation kit is installed and is opera tional in each dwelling.
d. A radon test is conducted following installation and operation of the remediation kit.
The results must be given to the purchaser of the dwelling.
8
c. The developer will give the Health Agent a copy of the 21E report.
f. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer.
g. The Developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area
prior to construction, demolition, and/or blas-ting and shall send a copy of the
exterminator's invoice to the Heakh Agent.
h. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
i. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control and
street sweeping which will occur during construction.
j. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and
removal of debris,vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material generated
during demolition and/or construction.
k. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting.
1. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including
but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound
level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line.
m. The developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any flu
material needed for the project.
n. The resultant establishment shall dispose of 211 waste materials resulting from its
operation in an environmentally sound manner as described by the Board of health.
o. The drainage system for this project must be reviewed.and approved by the
Northeast Mosquito Control and Wetlands Management District.
p. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final
inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met.
25. Pre-Construction Conference
Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivision, a pre-construction conference shall be
scheduled with the City Planner, the City Engineer (or his designee),the Building Corrunissioner,
the Health Agent, and any other departments that may be necessary. The Owner shall submit a
construction schedule at the time of the pre-construcdon conference.
26. Construction Practices
All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
a. The operation of tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work shall
occur in accordance vith Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5)7 Construction and
Blasting and between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:OWPM on weekdays and
Saturdays. No work shall take place on Sundays or holidays. The Planning Board
9
will agree to changes in the starting time, at the request of the applicant and if
approved by a formal vote of the City Council, as per the ordinance.
b. Any blasting,rock crushing,jack hammering, hydraulic blasting, or pile driving shall
occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5): Construction and
Blasting nd be limited to Monday-Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00
PM. There shall be no blasting,rock crushing,jack hammering, hydraulic blasting,
or pile driving on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays.
c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance aith all local and state regulations.
d. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction
on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided by the applicant to all abutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project.
e. All construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so
that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the
site.
f. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rules,regulations and ordinances
of the City of Salem.
g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight at the site must be located
completely on the site.
h. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and
Community Development, unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police
Department.
I
fRee- aDR\rcq oAL4 i-b ow"ia
27. Blasting 260'-F4 --e MT - PPD9 0"k'� 411
The applicant or argent shall distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for Massachusetts Property
a.
Owners About Blasting" to all abutters within three hundred (300) feet of the blasting are di
28. Construction Traffic
a. With the exception of off-site improvements required as part of this decision, all
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within City
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning& Community Development prior to construction.
b. A construction traffic management plan and schedule shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning& Community Development for review and approval prior
to the start of construction.
c. Any roadways, driveways,or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be
restored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. The Owner shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site,
and clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as
necessary.
10
29. Progress Reports
Upon the request of the Planning Board, the owner shall subrnit reports of the progress of the
subdivision's completion.
30. Clerk of the Works
The services of a consultant to serve as a Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City,at the
expense of the applicant, his successors or assigns as is deemed necessary by the City Planner.
31.Utilities
Any utility installation for housing lots shall be reviewed and approved by the City, Engineer
prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. All utilities shall be installed underground.
32. As-built Plans & Street Acceptance Plans
As-built plans and Street Acceptance Plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall
be subrnitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of
Public Services prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision
and/or the acceptance of any streets.
The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for
the City's use and approved by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of
Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets.
A completed tie card,a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification
signed and stamped by the design engineer,stating that the work was completed in substantial
compliance with the design drawing must be subinitted to the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets;as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer.
33. Violations
Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this pertnit by the Planning Board,
unless the violation of such condition is cured within fourteen (14) days, or waived by a majority
vote of the Planning Board.
I certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on
file with the Board. The decision shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the
certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that
if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the
Owners Certificate of Tide if Registered Land. The owner or applicant, his successors of assigns,
shall pay the fee for recording or registering.
Charles Puleo
Chairman
c)y) Claf J::�
64-CLA r-a-ae, oJR ft0oo / i n ftovo �;Nd�q
On �WO�UOAAA �OWCV- S19-P-MA
FAY,SPOFFORD&
THORND1KE
ENGINEERS 5 Burlingron Woods
I " , r�I�_P Burlington,MA 01803
P-01 TcflFrec 800335,8666
T.781.221,1000
WS1. F.781.229.IIL5
Si.,�1914 �mfisdllc.com
July 24,2007
Ms. Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP
Director—Dept. of Planning &
Community Development
City of Salem
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 0 1970
Subject: Preliminary Peer Review Report
Chanel Hill —Definitive Subdivision Plan
Dear Ms. Duncan:
In accordance with our agreement to provide professional engineering services to the Planning
Board dated April 24,2007,we have prepared the following comments and recommendations for
the proposed Chapel Hill Defit-titive Subdivision Plan. (Definitive Subdivision Plan — Chapel
Hill— Salem, Massachusetts, prepared by Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. dated June 28, 2006,
revised June 11, 2007 containing twelve(12) sheets and depicting 26 lots for"Town and Country
Homes of Peabody, MA". Our review of the Chapel Hill subdivision is based upon the June 11,
2007 plans depicting twenty-six (26) lots.
To prepare our comments, we have reviewed the Planning Board's meeting minutes pertaining to
this subdivision. We also performed a site visit to the property. The materials we have reviewed
for the Chapel Hill Definitive Subdivision include the following:
1. Form B —Decision—Clark Avenue/Chapel Hill, dated April 21, 2006.
2. Environmental Impact Statement for Chapel Hill Subdivision in Salem, MA, prepared for
Town and Country Homes,June 2006 by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc.
3. WPA — Form 3 — Notice of Intent filed with the City of Salem's Conservation
Commission, August 14, 2006.
4. Stormwater Management Plan—Chapel Hill Subdivision, Salem, MA—June 28, 2006
Our review will follow the criteria/requirements of the City of Salem, Zoning By-Law Section 7-
14 Cluster residential development.
G�E�tRS - PLANNERS - SCIENTISTS
�!
5"",:�t S,,�Ons
FAY,SPOFFORDÞINKE
Ms. Lynn Goonin Duncan,AICP July 24, 2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 2 of 9
PART I
First we reviewed the Definitive Subdivision Plan for Chapel Hill in accordance with the Board's
decision for the Preliminary Plan–Conditions of April 21, 2006:
Item 1: Capacity analysis of the water, sewage and drainage projections for the project.
Water Supyl
i
etWe have.review-ed the plans and supporting-documentation
water pressure is available for fire pro_te�iton!We did not �_nd VI ence to support
thig-feqniFe—ment.-TITe_re_f6r_eJt is our recommendation that the applicant be required to
conduct fire flow/pressure tests of the Clark Avenue water main to determine the
adequacy of the available water pressure and flow for fire protection. These tests should
be conducted with the Applicant and City present as soon as possible. This itiformation
is to be provided to the Board prior to their making a decision on this subdivision.
2. We have communicated with the City Engineer relative to the availability of adequate
water supply. It is our understanding that the City's water consultant is updating the
City's hydraulic water model at this time and will be checking the water supply
requirements for this subdivision with respect to the City's supply.
Sewaize:
We have not received the projected flow for the 26-lot subdivision. The current plan calls for
eleven less lots. The City's sewage collection system that will accept/transmit this flow to the
South Essex Sanitary District Wastewater Treatment Facility consists of a series of gravity
sewers and an ejector station on Highland Avenue (between Wal-Mart and Micnike Muffler).
Our firm was retained by the City to analyze the capacity of the Highland Avenue ejector station.
The results of our study concluded that the ejector station on Highland Avenue operates at or
near capacity on a regular basis, and that during wet weather sewage flows exceed the design
capacity of this station. For this reason, we recommend the Board require the applicant to
mitigate infiltration/inflow tributary to the Highland Avenue ejector station as required by the
City Engineer.
Drainage/Stormwate
See our Drainage comments on pages 4 and 5. We recommend that the Applicant be required to
provide the additional data and calculations to the Board in order for a final determination to be
made on the adequacy of the proposed drainage/stormwater design.
FAY,SpoFFop DÞDIKE
Ms. Lynn Goonin Durican,AICP July 24,2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 3 of 9
CQ�—raffic Analysis
We have not received a copy of the Traffic Analysis, so are unable to comment on this item. We
have notified the applicant regarding this matter.
Item 3: Secondary Access
We believe that the proposed plans provide only one primary access to the proposed 26 lot
definitive subdivision. We defer further discussion of this matter to the City Public Safety
Department.
PART It
An Environmental Impact Statement was submitted with the Definitive Subdivision Plan for
review as required by the Zoning By-Law Section 7-14 Cluster Residential Developme
Paragrgph (b). We have reviewed the June 2006 Environmental Impact Statement, EIS with
respect to Appendix A of the Salem, Massachusetts Subdivision Regulations Requirements for
Environmental Impact Statement, and prepared a list of deficiencies as compared with the
Checklist for Review qf the Environmental Impact Statement, pages B-I I through 13-14 of the
Regulations:
I. Natural Environment:
a. Item 2f. Type and amount of land permanently affected?
b. Item 3h. Efforts to recharge groundwater?
C. Effect of proposed sewage disposal methods?
2. Man-Made Environment:
a. Item I d. Proximity to transportation, shopping and educational facilities?
b. Item 2b. Ground coverage?
C. Item 3b. Adjacent zoning areas?
3. Public Facilities:
a. Item lb. Water demands for consumption and fire protection?
b. Item 5a. Quantity of refuse?
4. Community Services:
a. Item la. Number of school children?
FAY,SPOFFORD&THoRNmKE
Ms.Lynn Goonin Duncan,AICP July 24,2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 4 of 9
PART III
Review of Section 7-14(e)requirements for a special permit:
(1) No structure shall exceed two and one half(2.5) stories.
We did not find any details or architectural plans indicating the proposed height of the
buildings. We request the Applicant provide the Board with the proposed height of the
buildings.
(2) As far as possible,the plan follows the natural contours of the terrain and respects the
natural features of the site.
We reviewed the proposed grading plan and found that the slopes on the proposed open
space are in the order of 20%. We also note that there are considerable amount of
retaining walls proposed at the rear of the lots on Kimberly Drive ranging in height ftom
10 feet to as much as 24 feet. We recommend that the Applicant be required to provide
the Board with a response to this item.
(3) As far as possible the plan is in harmony with purpose and intent of this ordinance and
master plan of the City of Salem and that it will promote the purposes of this section.
We did not receive any information relative to the proposed Cluster residential
development with respect to the City's master plan. We recommend the Applicant
provide the Board with this information.
(4) The area of the tract of land to be subdivided is not less than five(5) acres.
The plan complies with this requirement given it consists of two parcels separated by the
unimproved portion of Clark Avenue,the northerly parcel consists of 8.04 acres and the
more southerly parcel consists of 8.24 acres.
(5) When the open land is added to the bui Iding lots, the total area shall be at least equal in
area to the land area required by the ordinance or by law for the total number of units or
buildings contemplated in the development for the zoning district.
We have confirmed that the proposed cluster residential development complies with this
item.
(6) At least twenty(20)percent of the total tract area(of which at least fifty(50)percent
shall not be wetlands or slope lands,nor shall it include streets,ways and parking areas)
shall be set aside a common land and shall consist of useable open space.
Our calculations indicate that the proposed cluster residential development complies with
this item.
FAY,SPOFFOP 1)&THoRNDIKE
Ms.Lynn Goonin Duncan,AICP July 24, 2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 5 of 9
(7) The cluster development would not result in a net negative environmental impact.
We cannot determine if there is a net negative impact to the City at this time.
PART IV
With respect to the cluster residential developments compliance with the requirements of the
City's Subdivision Regulations,we have found the following:
I. On Sheet 1 of 12 —A note needs to be added to the plans indicating Zoning District I for
Industrial.
2. Sheet 3 of 12 — The intersecting angle of Clark Avenue onto the proposed section of
Clark Avenue does not comply with the City's Regulations for subdivision control. The
required range for intersecting streets is between 60 and 100 degrees, the subdivision plan
indicates an intersecting angle of 117 degrees. This layout is an existing condition that
was left as a result of the original layout for Clark Avenue.
3. Intersection roundings are proposed at all the subdivision intersections with a radius of
25 feet; this does not conform to subdivision requirements of 30 feet. The radius of the
rounding should be revised to 30 feet to conform to the Regulations.
4. The proposed centerline radius of curvature is not met on Kimberely Road in two
sections. It is less than the 230-foot minimum on centerline curve as proposed at I 10 feet,
and the other at 124.5 feet. The subdivision plan must be modified to meet the City's
Regulations.
5. Sheet 3 of 12 - The intersection of Clark Avenue (proposed extension) and Jennifer
Circle does not comply with the maximum 100-degree angle for alignment. The
subdivision plans must be modified to comply with the Regulations.
6. Sheet 5 of 12 — A proposed trail is delineated on this sheet. There were no details or
signage associated with the proposed trail. The Board may want the applicant to define
the trail and determine the"detair'for construction of the trail.
7. On Sheet 5 of 12 — We note that the proposed drainpipe is within 12-feet± of the
proposed houses on Lot 18 and Lot 19. We question whether or not there is an alternative
pipe alignment to avoid this condition.
8. On Sheet 5 of 12 — A double retaining wall is delineated on the plans. There is no
indication of the construction details for these walls. The retaining walls are extensive
and will range in height from 10-feet to 24-feet. We recommend that a construction
detail of the retaining walls be provided.
FAY,SPOFFORD&THoRNDiKF
Ms.Lynn Goonin Duncan,AICP July 24,2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 6 of 9
9. On Sheet 6 of 12—The Industrial I Zone needs to be shown on the plan.
10. On Sheet 7 of 12 — The size and type of the utility pipes need to be clearly labeled on
both the plan and profile.
11. On Sheet 8 of 12 — A proposed sewer manhole is shown at Station 4+75. This manhole
will contain both gravity and force main sewer. A construction detail needs to be
provided for this structure.
12. On Sheet 8 of 12 —The type of pipe for the low-pressure sewer should be labeled on the
plan.
13. On Sheet 9 of 12—The type of low-pressure sewer pipe should be labeled on the plans.
14. On Sheets 10' 11 and 12 — Consisting of the standard detail sheets. We did not find
details for the following items:
0 Street trees-no detail or reference to street trees was provided on the plans.
0 Streetlights-no detail or reference to strectlights was provided on the plans.
0 Fire Alarm Box required for this subdivision - no detail or reference was provided
on the plans
0 We note a thrust block has been provided as part of the standard hydrant
installation detail. We recommend that a typical/standard detail for all bends and
tees proposed on the water main be provided.
PART V
We have reviewed the low-pressure sewer design, and noted several inconsistencies in the design
calculations:
> According to the Environmental Impact Statement, the sewage average daily flow is
14,500 gallons per day. That is approximately 392 gallons per day per dwelling. This
seems a bit higher than the suggested design value Eone design assistant program*
suggests, as well as what would be recommended by Title V
> In addition, flow per core seems to be calculated as 14 gpm; however, the typical is
generally 11 gpin for these single residence grinder pumps.
> The tables used to determine velocity and friction head loss do not seem to be referenced.
It appears they may be based on the standard flow rates described above rather than the
alternates specified in the design table.
FAY,SPOFFORDÞDIKE
Ms.Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP July 24,2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 7 of 9
> Also, when the design values presented are entered into the Eerie design assistant
program*, values obtained for velocity, friction losses, and dynamic head are not
consistent with what was found in the design table provided in the fax described above.
> None of the proposed individual grinder pumps for providing sewer service to the lots on
this subdivision are shown on the plans. We recommend these units be shown on the
plans.
It would be preferable for the calculations to be redone with these inconsistencies addressed.
Reference: Environmental One Corporation,Design Assistant 6.01
PAGE VI
We have reviewed the Drainage/Stormwater Management Calculations for compliance with the
City's requirements and sound engineering practice. We have the following questions and
comments:
I. The hydrologic soils group for the project site could not be verified because it was not
shown on the soils maps. The Applicant needs to revise the soils map accordingly.
2. For SC-3 and SC-4, in calculating the time of concentration, did the Applicant consider
flow paths that originate on the eastern comer of the watersheds at approximately El.
164?
3. For SC-lA, SC-2A, SC-3A, and SC-413, the open space acreage appears to be high. The
Applicant needs to confirm that the open space acreage is correct.
4. On the proposed watershed map, the watershed delineation lines for SC-3A and SC-4C
do not meet in the vicinity of Lot 32. The Applicant needs to revise and resubmit the
watershed map.
5. On the proposed watershed map, two watershed areas are labeled as "SC-4A". The
Applicant needs to revise and resubmit the watershed map.
6. The Applicant needs to explain the increased acreage in watershed areas for SC-213 and
SC-3B for the 10- and 100-year storm events.
7. hi Table 2 of the Storrawater Management Plan, the subcatchment areas listed as being
directed north and south are inconrect. However, the flows in the table are correct. The
Applicant needs to revise.
8. No details of the riprap level spreader were provided for our review.
9. No details of the subsurface drainage system were provided for our review.
FAY,SpoFFoRD&THoRNDnoi
Ms.Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP July 24,2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 8 of 9
10. No details of the rooftop recharge systems were provided for our review.
11, No test pit/percolation test data was conducted to assess the suitability of the soils for the
recharge systems, detention basins or the underground detention system. The Applicant
needs to conduct these tests at each location in order for the Board to determine the
adequacy of the drainage/stonnwater management system.
12. The plans do not label the pipes with their length. The Applicant needs to revise the
plans and label the pipe lengths on Sheets 7, 8, 9 and 10.
13. The drainage calculations submitted by the Applicant does not contain design
calculations for the catch basins to demonstrate system adequacy, including gutter flow
capacity, width of gutter flow spread, inlet capacity/percent interception versus percent
bypass for the selected inlet grate configuration. These calculations are necessary for the
Board to determine the adequacy of the drainage/storrnwater management system.
14. FST measured the Time of Concentration flow lengths on the plan and compared them to
those in the TR55 calculation worksheet.
Total lengths differed by more than 10% for:
Existing Areas: SC 1, SC4
Proposed Arm: SCIA, SClB, SC2A, SC2B, SC3A
15. Existing areas SCI and SC2 flow lines used for the time of concentration (Tc) does not
he perpendicular to the contour lines.
16. The assumed default of 100-foot length of sheet flow does not appear to be hydraulically
accurate in all cases, such as, areas of varying slope and topography(e.g. SCI).
17. Calculated slopes in TR55 for existing areas SC3 and SC4 do not match those depicted
on the plan for the corresponding Tc flow path.
18. Orientation of flow path Tc lines for proposed areas do not consistently follow
topography.
19. On the TR55 form for SCIA,the Shallow Concentrated flow should be labeled as paved.
20. The CN calculation does not account for impervious roof area in SC2B.
21. On the TR55 form for SC3B, the Shallow Concentrated flow should be labeled as paved.
22. The time of concentration flow path for SC4A starts on a rooftop; affecting length of
sheet flow.
FAY,SpoFFoRD&THoRNmKE
Ms.Lynn Goonin Duncan,AICP July 24,2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 9 of 9
23, Tc is labeled as user defined for SC4C; applicant should indicate methodology for
determination of this value.
A copy of this letter is being forwarded to the Applicant, Town and Country Homes, c/o
Attorney John Keilty and Christopher Mello,PLS,of Eastern Land Survey Associates.
We are prepared to answer any questions you may have regarding this letter. Please do not
hesitate to contact me at 781-221-1183 or email scasazza(a),fistinc.com.
Very truly yours
FAY, SPOFFORD ÞDIKE,LLC
By
S*J�- d4ar
tepnphn A. Casazza,P.E.
Senior Principal Engineer
Attachments
cc: David H.Knowlton,P.E.
City Engineer
TALG-400\Chapel HiII\LTR-100.dm
AIW
f7
tit
zz,
7p,UP
pump( am&
I(*
`PSOH�+ fi�)Vxcts
Of 1'jen4—
Application Submitted 18/27/2015
Posted 10/1 and 10/8
Legal Ad Status
x-,r'i""��--��L'�'��
Notice to Alumina,x� NOA sent 10/1 ca,-�
m !i, i
r N Ua4r' Rieciewed:Comid.mm'.nfir,I
KI
Building Commissioner, 11
I,rr 11� zoned parent and its future
,E!" ���' �F"i, 'i��,
J]� development
vj
0 'VInlins�"',
j,
'SK I
I I comm'sial Received Required Ordereff F efthe lots are zoned 1,no
Consernation 'f
Conditions from Cons lovations provided,trail
construction of a roadway to City Engineer
Fall 77ln.�a,astions,breakdown of net CA
Clark Street serve tworl(26) Map 6,Parcel 7,8 and 9 7—
rosideni lots. kln Received:wart to see hydraulic open space is unclear,
report done by third partsource commentfrom abutter
Fire q ensure max water supply,no regarding public way
hammerheads or turning radius
quired;" 71,1,,_'.1"
. 11 4
I, V,
u ii
W
r! , 77,
Board of Health
L i, Pending Tal Order,9/29
Shurrinkabir Pa.,Ihoi 9� requested bask order from gjjN"-'
Bois ri
[Sishool�D. t-
'r K�j "'o Mailed 10/5 No Response
of:
h, I" a', Miller!10/5!
11fearingStatus Continued to 10/1 5/2ul 9
Application Submitted 7/la/7015
Legal Ad Status Posted 7/16&7/23
Special Permit per Sec,SEE 4.0 Notice to Abutters NOA sent 10/1
of the NROC to allow a multi- Building Commissomilir Patidurig�ws % -i '
story arrangement of a multi Received:Project:was appealed
family residential use.The to DEP,.DEP Mulatto
applicant requests Conservation Commission superceding order or require
amendments to the following submittal of a new Notice of 0
approved Special Permits of Intent
the NRCC:A Special Permit Onyl Engin... Received:no comments. 0'
1. _JL .
per Sec.8.4.12 Retail Use of 11
Giant., the NRCC to allow ground 401 Bridge Street Received If construction is split
level retail use to be amended in Phasing,wl I I it she File the iiz:�j 4xii
from the original decision to Fire parking plan?Working hydrant )r
exceed the 3,000 gross square within 150',snow removal and
feetforme,retailer.ASpecial storage net thewn
Permit per Sec 6 0 to be
amended from the original Board of Health Received no new rea other than
decision to allow an eating original list of conditions
and drinking place on the GI Peer Review pending
promises Received Comment, sent to
Traffic Peer Review petitioner
Hearing Status Continued to 10/15/1015
9/24/2015
Application Submitted
LegalAdStatus
flotge to Abutters
Id mi oneL
e, ant.4tod
in ovelt Yale,
Old 5 inal art rt , 5 t.Peters Str t d a
an Ill
Heading Statim, 10/15/2015 Agindis
Application Submitted B/27/2015 Per Legal Opinion from City
Legal Ad Status Posted 10/1 and 1018 Solicitor,lots have merged due
Notice to Abutters NOA sent 10/1 to I'm,ownership.
Building Commissioner Pandings"..
��vo , Hydrant services shall be
Lnza=Commuslon P a d .W, .
M-4i installed at the End of the line.
qi�r 2'serve.line inzill be
lied,and at such time the
City Engineer Pan Ing r ratex
A!� water main is installed on the
to construct a roadway to n �'L p
Almeda serve two existing 14&16 A -------- x�reei the propain,,owner
Subdivision Undeveloped lots Received:noted problems in the Fire-Until such time the water
future unless adequate connect main surstalled,the property
Fir. to city water supply is provided owner shall have spri I ri 7,
and that turning on private a property owner s a
property would cause damag :e,,rd a temporary easement
oallowthe Fire Department
Board of Health liev,
Sthi Dept
P.Ifice Dept
IHearingStatus
October 26, 2007
Ms. Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP
Director—Dept. of Planning &
Community Development
City of Salem
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970
Subject: Secondary Peer Review Report
Chapel Hill—Definitive Subdivision Plan
Dear Ms. Duncan:
In accordance with our agreement to provide professional engineering services to the Planning
Board dated April 24, 2007, we have prepared the following conunents and recommendations for
the proposed Chapel Hill Definitive Subdivision Plan. (Definitive Subdivision Plan — Chapel
Hill— Salem, Massachusetts, prepared by Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. dated June 28, 2006,
revised August 20, 2007 containing twelve (13) sheets and depicting 26 lots for "Town and
Country Homes of Peabody, MA". Our review of the Chapel Hill subdivision is based upon the
August 20th, 2007 plans depicting twenty-six (26) lots.
To prepare our comments, we have incorporated discussions held at our meeting with the City
and the development team held at City Hall Annex on October 4 Ih 2007.
1. Submittal letter of September 24h, 2007 by Attorney John R. Keilty, Esquire containing
photo simulations, cross sections and a plan indicating the separation distance from the
back of the lots on the proposed Kimberly Road to existing homes on Clark Street.
2. A survey plan of the existing intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue showing the
Existing Conditions by Eastern Land Survey Associates date September 12, 2007.
3. Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc. letter of response dated September 11, 2007
containing three pages.
Our comments are as follows:
Kimberly Road—centerline radius:
�ith respect to the waiver request on the proposed Kimberly Road for the centerline radius,
provided the Dept. of Public Works has no issue relative to maintenance and the Fire Department
has no issue relative to access, it is at the Board's discretion to grant or deny the waiver.
Presumably the purpose of the centerline radius being proposed less than the required radius is to
Ms. Lynn Goonin Duncan,AICP October 12, 2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 2 of 3
minimize the amount of road provided and maximizes the required open space under the Cluster
by-law. FST has reviewed the turning radius for a school bus/fire truck size vehicle to negotiate
the comers of Kimberly Road at Clark Avenue. We found that this type of vehicle making the
turn would occupy both travel lanes; however, given that this roadway is a "secondary' roadway,
our recommendation is to grant the waiver on the centerline radius because there would not be a
safety problem We also checked the grade of the road and found it to be within the Planning
Board requirements.
Intersection of Clark Avenue and Jennifer Circle:
�e reviewed the proposed intersection of Jennifer Circle with Clark Avenue a second time and
determined that the intersecting angles are acceptable.
0 Walking path easement:
We recommend an easement be required and granted to the City for public access to the
proposed walking path within the dedicated open space as discussed at our meeting with the
development team on October 4, 2007.
0 Proposed retaining walls:
With respect to the proposed retaining walls, the Applicant has indicated where they will be
required and provided some pictures (samples) of what they may look like. Please provide
specifications, including the height of the walls and details of their design, on the plans in order
for FS&T to review and make a recommendation to the Board as to the safety of these structures.
Street lights:
�e recommend a typical street light detail be shown on the plans along with approximate
location of the streetlights.
a Individuals grinder pumping stations:
We recommend a note be added to the plans indicating which lots will require individual and
privately owned grinder-pumping stations for sewage disposal.
0 Drain pipe labels:
We recommend the drainpipes be labeled on the plans.
0 Drainage calculations:
With respect to the gutter line flow calculations we requested previously, we respectfully request
these calculations be submitted to the Board for review by FS&T to ensure that the drainage
system will function as designed.
0 Street Trees:
We recommend the proposed species and location of the street trees be delineated on the plans.
Ms. Lynn Goonin Duncan,AICT October 12, 2007
Chapel Hill Subdivision Review Page 3 of 3
0 Offisite Improvements:
A) We recommend a condition of approval for this subdivision be improvements to the
Clark Street/Clark Avenue intersection, including drainage and/or road improvements
acceptable to the City Engineer. We have conducted a site visit with the City Engineer
and observed the "trapped" drainage/stormwater which has resulted in erosion of the
pavement surface creating numerous pot holes. This intersection requires drainage
improvements and replacement of the pavement.
B) We recommend a condition of approval for this subdivision be removal of infiltration and
inflow (1/1) from the City's Sewage Collection System acceptable to the City Engineer.
As previously mentioned, the Highland Avenue Ejector (sewer) pumping station is at or
near capacity on a regular basis. This pumping station is over taxed due to infiltration &
inflow, particularly during wet-weather/high ground water periods.
A copy of this letter is being forwarded to the Applicant, Town and Country Homes, c/o
Attorney John Keilty and Christopher Mello, PLS, of Eastern Land Survey Associates.
We are prepared to answer any questions you may have regarding this letter. Please do not
hesitate to contact me at 781-221-1183 or email scasazzagfstine.com.
Very truly yours
FAY, SPOFFORD & THORNDIKE, LLC
By
Stephen A. Casazza, P.E.
Senior Principal Engineer
Attachments
cc: David H. Knowlton,P.E.
City Engineer
TALG-400\Chapel Hill\LTR-200.doc
N LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAIN
1 SECTION IV A I f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERUME RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRI DATE: -------------——-
C30) FEET FOR CHANEY STROM. AND, IN PEACE DREADED, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LN'OUT AS
SHOWN ON F-ANS. 1. CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO
�ERESI CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF IHIS A. By
2,SECTIOK N A 4 a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN HE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS
LENGTH.AND IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW A LENGTH BE 101 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN OFFIC AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY
ON PLANS DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OP SAID NOTICE
3.SECTION V RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3
DAHMER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, MD. IN PLACE THEREOF'LED. TWO (2� TREES PER LOT. --—--—---—--—------------
CTY CLEEN
NOTE THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT 70 AW.END THIS UST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS,
LOCUS
I CEFILL'Y THAT I THAVE CONFORMED
WIT. THE RULES ME PEOUJUATOI
OF THE REGISTERS OF DE-DS IN
LOCUS ED EPARING THIS PLAIN.
1'=800'± W5I-
ISINHHO l.EX.I N -wLGAMS VP GES LEC
NOTES 07-IFFoa "FIRCES AN' /
AN LOUISE I TFrE
SLEISOR KRN'NFIET M.-- IF LNIRNNE
UNNUWc GIL.110,
GVEE SIXT/1 I A OWN
VERTICAL-DATUM UNKNOWN (SE NOFE-2)—I 07-FWN .`OENEAT
.,-WGE� 07_ IWULA.
GMRGE. EMN Y, NO ABBREVIATIONS
TOPOGRAPHY AND UlI ARE AS SHOWN ON THE PREVIFOUST, El-XKU` LEGEND OF SYMBOLS A
AANE.- N
APPROVED DEFINITIVE SUISDINITSION BY THE CITY OF SALEM (MARCH 3. 2008 Y7-.1
DEC SON) ENTITLED -DEFINITIVE SUBMIT PLAIN. CHAPEL HILL, SALEM.
MASSACHUSETTS' DATED JUNE 28. 2006 RVKSED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, GAS ONE
2 007 BY EASTERN LAND SURVE". MONITORING WELL
3 WETLAND RESOURCE AFFEA BOUNDARIES WERE DELINEATED BY WILLIAMS & 1 2 3 EYE HYDRANT
SIPARAGES, 4 WATER GA�
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND 1 OPEN SPACE 1
DETERMINING THE LOCATION. SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES,
SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLAINS. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION T. CATCH X'Sl\(DIANE) 0
E ENGINEER SMALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF My UILLIDES FOUND PROW 5
INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND AFFRCPRMTE UPI NOT
T.
REM DEAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK 6 LIGHT POLE
5 TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT BE HEAT PATICHED 13
6, ALL WATER ROUND STIVALL BE 3" DIAMETER CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED 14 DRAN MANHOLE 0
DUCTILE IRON [C.LG�L ) 12 15 7 TUL/TLIC.MANHOLE 0
7. ALL GRANTEY SEVER LINES SIEGEL BE BE DIAMETER SET 35 PVC PIPE 16 9 10 11 VOWED NMHOLE 05
8 WA-ER AND SEWER SFALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL GOING -CONCRETE
SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES 17 SWN - STONE BOUND GULL ROLE
SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER AND SEVEN LINES CROSS, NOW I�
FY HAVI END �FOUND
9 All-STORM DRAINS SNAU-BE HIGHT-DENI. POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HOPE) 1 061
ON LESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAIN 18 HOR .fiAND CAP RAW
10. MINIMUM PITCH FOR ALL GRAIN LINES SHALT- BE 05% N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
MHUM
11, ELECTRIC. GAS. TELEPHONE AND CABLE TAE SERVICES SHALL BE EWNNI 24 C.... GO, - FOR ROD
INSTALLED UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WON THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY 11 25 GOI TRUE
AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. 26 E-XYI 0
12 STREET TREES SHALL BE FLAWED AT TWO (2) PER LOT UNLESS EXISTING BOWDEN
OTHERI NOTED ON PLAIN. SEE REQUESTED WAJVER 20 23
PRO POSES CONTOUR -[BED---
1,1 FIRE ALNRMI BOX INSTALLATION AND LOCATION(S) INALL BE IN 22 EWE OF RVEMENT
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SALEm FEE 21 IF
DEPARTMENT. VERTICAL GRANITE CURB NGG
14, TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROAXYDAYS IWO DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE ED
MADE USING RADIUS GRANTEE CURBS. PRO "S SILT NUNG'
15. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION (TO BE SHOWN AT A LATER DATE) SHALL RE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, KPI A J11IIIIIII,
WBI RNI SURENUff r"11I
OR, OTHER APPROVING AUTHORITY XE-GGI�
16, -.HE SUBJCCT PROPERTY DOES NOT UFF WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD l<
FAZARD AREAS (BEHAVE)SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 19 ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOOD AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MUS' NUMBER OPEN SPACE 2 27
25001 MAP REVISED JULY 16. 2014 AUG 2 12015
DEPI OF P
CO&IMUN, Qzr OF
IVNES L CITY OF SA_EM
.Ni4NN
PUNNING BOARD
f
----------------------—
HER KNO& .0 N
--N` -----------------------
C/o..'
WINGIRI INDEX PLAN
——---- 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
PLAN SET INDEX
OWFNER-
SHEET 1: INDEX PLAN BARBkRA DRISCO-L EL AL
18 WALLACE READ
SHEET 2-3: DEFINITIVE PLANS LYNN, " 019011.360561
ED DEBTS 3605!
---------------------
APPLICANTIT
SHEET 4-5: DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILES w WSPWARAGESS
9 ASD BEAUTY TRUST
6 CA IL-E STREET
< SHEET 6-7: TOPOGRAPHIC PLANS AM 01905
LYNN.
PROUFFICT LORI T ;tFROW'"RUNN
SHEET 8-10: DETAIL SHEETS CLARK AVENUE EATON. MA
..0 FIRM IUBI
ASSESSORS E
MAP 6 FARELS
s GUE 07M 539-SZN
INDEX SHEET I OF I
CAT
CT I OF 10
IF AI 14.ZVI 5
JEANETTE H, LORICK GEORGE M. &
07-OWS ALFRED&JOM C.I-L FULHO N
FRANCES -IJCIA.O JOSEPH & 07-0003
07-0007 LOUISE P, SHEASON PAUL, PAULETTE, JOHN LORR.I
07-0005 & SCOTT LEB-ANC CACKE TRUST UR ESMA HYSENESH1 E. JR
07-0004 57-0076 07-0002 M. ONNC
% 07-0086 TEAM y AEIC-C�DIR
RCHARD L 0 MY
03-0137
IMAN
6 OPEN SPACE 1
AREA-168,388 S.F.
I LOT I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
.697 S.F� (44,100± S F. WETILANOS) WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
12 �F. OF THE RZGISTERS OF DEEDS N
. ..........
REPAIRING THIS PIUNM�
LOT 4
A 7,492 S.F. B
7.605 S.F.
Y/
NI,. LOT 5
7.421 S.F. 'U
'Rq'
�EFFREY M. ------
ELUEN T GO TO
02- 46
P, QqD
U�
ROADWAY LOT 6 EASEMC,T
EASEMENT LOT 13 7.20 S.F.
LOT 14
M- 12.4W S.F. CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING 90ARD
---------------------
LOT 12
A 11.127 S.F. LOT 7
411� I.— .�'A'2 1
----------
I I VF'l LOT I I
4-, LOT 16 LOT a 'T 'a 7.994 S.F.
- 6.370 S.F. SX.
-----—---------------
..7 .1.
MRAP 6
A -7 - 'k -
1 02' A-�m
E.jI H.
LCTT 17
1 270
8.233 S.F. I,.
A
—--—--------
U� ------
A;,I
A' -A
g ------—------------
TRAN 2014 S84;1 T LOT 18
8,516 S.F.
REALTY TOM I -"�dy
-H 1,
R12 ---------------
TADEUSZ &
I" /
JOANNA 4?
I I -
BARCIKOWSKI A,
c-
06-0017 LOT 19 K..'R Mv-
'�,Ff 3,627 S.F. SALEM
.01,SEWATON DATE- -----------------
LOT 24
fD'+ P L"'"3 COMMISSION
12.636 S.F. 06-001,
4.
P LOT 25
'j. 21�/ 7.904 SI
78.41
cy-
/"?, LOT 26
Z F.
7.853 S
LOT 20 S.ts LOT 23
4.709 &F. S,F.
lr'41
RR
eb LOT 22
7.6M S.F.
LOT 21 SCALED LOCATION
—LINE
.41 A, DENOTES A ORANGE STONE BOUND
CERTIFICATION THE PLAN lz'-' WITH A DRILL HI TO BE SET.
CLERKS ON X> LR ,.A
DATE:—-------- 10\ �l 14
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO
Az
EREBr CERTIFY THAT T
HE NOTICE OF APPRONW. Or THIS PLAN BY
THE PLANNING SCARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECE]WD DURING THE TIVENI SURYA& IIAPT
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE ISABEULE mm REASION
06-0015 A.?
DEFINITIVE PLAN
CITY CLERK "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
c OWNER SALEM, MASSACHUSEITS
LOT 27 BAREARA DRISCOLL ET Al
147.992 S.R IS WAULACE ROAD
-.N� MA 01901
_C CENTS 36055.36056.36057 WILLIAMS
RESIDENT� RESIDENG,41- OPEN SPACE 2 APPLICANT'
6 ZONE ONI INDUSTRIAL ONI NED RE,k-�-RUST SPARAGES
AREA=135,070 S.F.
(RI) 0) DRl) CLUSTER 76�ILLE STREET
(47,500± S.F. WErILANDS) LYNN. MA 01905
T I8RNAATNM,`N�
N. A LOT FRONTAGE: 00 FT 50 FT DNONI PROJECT LOCUS' I
=:=LOT WIDTH: i0o " ;50 P, (NONE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS- CLARK A�NLE SALEM. MA U�Dl
MINIMUM LET ARF� 15.000 SI 40.000 SY, (NONE) TOTAL PARCEL AREA-750.538 S.F ASSESSORS REFERENCE, WKWENGUL19-mu
IT COVERAGE BY BUILDING, 30X 45% wx MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED - 150.108 S.F. jM OF TOTAL) s
MA'INAIM HEIGHT OF BUILDING, 35 ITT 45 FT 35 FT F MAP 6 PARELS 7. 5& 9 1.01PS31I
(MIMI�OPEN V�E UPLAND REQUIRED . 75,054.WHICH IS 50% OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED)
OF'EN SPACE PRKTRIDED - 303.456 S.F. 0' 2a 40' 80,
MINIMUM FRONT YARD' 15 FT 30 FT 15 IT (OPEN SPACE UPI_QND PROMCCO . 211,858± �.r) DEFINITIVE SHEET I OF 2
M�N MUM S BE YMD 10 FT au FT 10 FT
M=Um REAR IARD 30 FT 30 FT 30 IT SCALE:V-40'
c SHEET 2 OF 10
AUGUST 14,2015
15 46
"I'M
LOT I I a
IIAN. LOT a I—7N, LOT i 7,19�S.F�
,370 S.F� 2
LOT 16
N- 6.782 S
10 245 S F
A7�1'
�EmUAT 1.
I 1 24 71I.Al
A-
LOT 17
8,2M SX�
W.
2-
LOT 18 L�2�l
4.,
5.516 S.F.
tR'.. ':
0`4
&"- — *I , �',I .."i _ ,,.'�WOODLAP "s
TRAM 2014 TADELSZ& .. p,;-'.'/ .
FQAL' ,>,,WOODLZ
yoo
',','�OODLA�
I CC PFf THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
TR IT,�;� W17HNTHE RUUPS AND REG�i-ATIONS
G-OM)'x lzk 0 %4W A
JOANNA
OF THE REGISTERS OF D-05 -N
SARCP�QASNI A.
LOT 19 ww��y PREPARING THIS PILAN.
3.627 S.F. ON
il 05-0017 CONSOWAT
co.mlss, N
LOT 24
X W 12.W6 ST
3',o 41
,A 11 '." z 1� 1� '-ft, WILLIAMS SPARAGES LLC
I o , I
904 SY. 2
LOT 26
05� 7.853 S.F. 112�
�-y,
!l)
LOT 23
��0
14LIITI;& 8.251 S.F.
1�/.-k?',
V R-45.W
GO! -1 '1-
LOT 22 S.
7.00 S.F. PON
) LOCA
LOT 21 SrALEI
LINE
S.F.
e.S
A,
'U" �EMENT CjW OF SALEM
ISABELLE WIWO PLANNING BOARD
06-0015
------———----—
AL Lar 27
147.992 S.F.
OPEN SPACE 2 ---------
AREA=135,070 S.F.
(47,5001 S.F. WETLANDS)
--------- —------
V
—-------—-—
.[AMES E. CCNNICK
06-CCO5
CONOTE"A FIT OUNDI
WITH A 1.11-nCLE!TUO-NEC SCT
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ZONE ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY
(RI) 0) (Rl)CLUSTER
M.:ZMLOT FRONTAGE: 00 , �50 TV 0 E)
U.M LOT MOTH: ico FT 50 7 �NONNE) UYNN SAID& STONE NOL �vm DA'TE
MINIMUM LOT AREK 15.000 S.F. 40.00D S F. QNONE) C/O
LOT CMRAGE BY BUILDING 5 30% 06-00 2 DEFINITIVE PLAN
,OMUM "EIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT
Tr 35 FT "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
I
=MNIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT i5 FT
Imum SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 0 PT SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
s MINIMUM NEAR YARD: 30 FT 30 H FT
OWNER
;R BARBARA SCOLL ET Al-
Is�A-UACE ROAD
L� I
LE N. MA DIED,
CERTS 3605536056,M057 WILLLAMS
-.4 mr o
CI-ERK$ CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN CWTRUST SPARAGES
76 CAWLLE STREET
DATE: L", "01905 y 109NDONUNAN�
I Is. �Ml
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO SEAL CILARI AA.ft'-. R,GUFT0R'NA`UHM`
�IRERY COVIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPRNA-OF THIS PLAN By s NNGNP 0")539
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS MEN RECE�D AND RECORDED AT THIS MIN, OKN SPACE REQUIRED - 150.108 S.F. (20%OF TOTAL) AUONDIMH�
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECOMED DURING THE TMENTY (MIN.OPEN SPACE U�D MOUTRIED . 75,054, HIGN M 50%OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED) NAP 6 PANELS 7. 8 &9
DA'S AM AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE OPEN SPACE PROADED - 303L.511 SY. 0' 2W 4W K, DEFINITIVE SHEET 2 OF 2
(OPEN SPACE UPLAND PF,,DED 211.658± SP,)
------- SHEET 3 OF 10
C ERK
AUGU�14.2015
CAW-
ma/
07-0
ALL �C
LvC N 07-0003
LORRAIIII
CACHE TRUsF L
—�WLE 'U'R & FSNA HYSENESHI
07-W76 07-DOU2 VRFUJA� .0AROE. JR,
07-00116 AEDQ-wR
07-OMI
RICHARD L O'My
33-0H37 _OPEN
I GE -'U
X RTF, "A'
WITH THE RULES AND REGLAATONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS
PREPARING THIS PLAN
OPEN SPACE I
=A..K1. �k SP GH LLC
D7
AM.
CIW OF SALEM
PLjNNAI?NG BOARD
j�'�"
TRAIN 20'4 DATE:
REALFT M 49 A�l
06-001
AN-1
CONSEWATION
COMMISSION
06 MIT
clil UZ, k
DENOTES A GfUVOTTE STORE BOUND
VOTH A DRILL HERE TO BE SET,
LOCAT10A
ZON LINL
TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
-17HE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
��SYULRYA
E U SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
r
GG " -
15 OWNER,
BARBARA,DRISCOLL-7 A.
Is WALILLNE ROAD
LU VA,01901
I.,� 36GS5.36056.36057
CLEWS CERTIFICARON ON 7NE Pl-AN RESIDEAM� RESIDENTIAL APPUCANT' WHJ-L4,MS
ZONE., CNE-FAMILY IN�X ONE-FAA&Y Nso REALW MOST SPARAGES
MTL (RI) 0) (RI)CLUSTER 76 OAGM�E STRUT
LYNN. MA GINS
I. CLUX OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO MIN MUM LOT FRKYNFAGE: 100 IF 150 FT (NME) locus- "'NOTTHMAMSOVIO
HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF�&OF THS PLAN! BY MZMUM LOT Mum IOU R m I (NONE) SCAL
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BUN RECUtED,AND RUZRDD)AT PUS MINUUM LOT 15.000$.IF 40.000 SY. (NONE) CLARX$AO4UE Vad. .�NI
OFFICE AND �07;)SW�
M�MM THAT NO APREAI-WAS RECURRED DURING THE TIMENlY LOT OMRAGE BY BUILDING: 45X ASSESSORS REFERENCE, s PUL 014 53�W
AFTER SUCH RECCIn AND RECORDING M SAID NOTICE. MXUMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING' 35 FT �5 FT 35"
= M M YARD: i5 FT 30 R ;'5 IFT W 20' 4W aw POGRAPHIC SHEET I OF 2
0 �!!� I TO
=MUM MM YARD: D IFT .30 I'l FT
CRY CLERK MINIMUM BEAR YARD 30 FT 30 FT 30 a SCALE:I'-4W SHEET 6 OF 10
Z' �AUCUST 14.2011 1
A,, yk
A
AM
TRAIN 2014 IAND
T)DEHsz
R '0 A
C R 5 1 C PHIFY THAT I MANE CONFORMED
Okol H B A
C G�k
THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
INN-IINI Or THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
19.5 IN It SALE.
I ON ON PREPARING -FIS Ptr,MN�
N 4 COMMISSION
06 0011
A, WILUIMMS & SPAIRAGES ELC
t U6
D.,
f,
A
1) LOCAPQ�L CITY OF SALEM
n
ZON LINE ... .. PLANNING BOARD
72
Z,
0
-----------------------
IOU, <
INDIA SU=
ISABELLE Rl
06-001 k
-----—-----—----——
Ar. —-—----------
A
-A� Ag;i —r
——----—---
EBRO,.. WTE2
DAN DATE- —-—---------—-
W.A.OFF Or ONE w A ......
V, A, AF A%
A7 Ar
vr Ats,/
wr..Y//1-/ I
A,AIN
IIANES DOMINICK
CLERKS CERTI ON THE PI-PN
DATE: 2 9- DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A ORREAL HOLE TO BE SO,
1. CLERK OF THE CHr OF SALEM, DO
HER BY CORI THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROI OF THIS PLAN BY A,
THEEPILLMINING BOARD HAS BEEN RECTIMED AND RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AN THAT NO APPEAl-WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TAIENTY 0 FPACt-2
AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE
DAYS NEXT k
N,AM, &\sTOK
-AGG TE IN3UYTR NO. REV50ON
Ar.1
4 TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
f
1 01 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
,NI
Mr. BARBARA DRISCOLL 7 AL
to `U-MCE READ
LH,, 0190,
A RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL KITS 3W55.36056.36057 WrLLLAMS
ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAIL ONE-FAAM�kf ED Ck
ORI)
(1) (RF CLUSIER SPARAGES
K NSD REALTY TRUST &
VZ= LOT FRONTAGE: GO FT i5 FT ME) 76 OMANI STREET
0 0 A
WN U L07 WIDTH; ;w FT ISO NONE) "l—
N, L%N. "01905 ItIgNEARINAMNOTIkEET
MIN MO. LOT A EA, I 5�0013 SY. 40.0DO S.F. (NONE) y —I.,
RW PRClJFCT LOCUS'
BUILDING 30', 45% 30% ARI— CLARK AMENDS SAL.EM. MA
M"IMUM HEIGHT OF BI 35 PT 45 IT 35 FT ANDRENIMS39-11081
A' 6 PMAEUS 7. 8 & 9 s
N.V110139-12M
f 30 IT 15 FT
,:NM . FRONT YARD: 15 IT
NZU SIDE YARD: 10 FE w FT 10 FT PML. W ZW 40' By TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 2 OF 2
MIR L
MINIMUM REAR YANG: 30 IT w FT SO IFT EA.
SCALE: SHEET 7 OF 10
-- LO
Nw, r ALI
STAINCUORD HYDRANT TO MEET CITY OF
A �OTE SALEM NEOLREAE.TS
CONCRETE THRUST BLOC, TO BE USED ONE'WHERE IT
VERTICAL GRANITE CURB, TYPE VB WILL BEAR ON U4DISTIURRED WTH� PUMPER N BREAKAWAY ILANGE
C,RICR ELF WALL OF MANHOLE PINISHL GRADE.MATERIAL VARIES USE RESTRAINER JOINT FITTINGS Q.E�UC Be FACES ROAD
5H THRUST BLOCK IS CON ECT,ON-I\
SLOPE 1, 1 BINDER GOLFED APPROVED EQUAL) WHERE CONCRETE
UNACCEPTABLE.
TOP COURSE 7-_ SIZE OF BLOCK OR MEGAILG 70 RE DESIGNED FOR IS SMEWALK
TIMES NORMAL OPERATING PRESSURE.
B FL-0—w B VARIES EDGESTONE
TING PRESSURE EOCESTONE
FINISHED STREET GRACE
BAK COURSE 6' -6,
MIN.
FOR PAVE.EN7 MAKEUP. CRUSHED STONE
MALDEN ST DARD
SEE PANEMENT NOTES AN VE
PIPE VALVE BOX AND COVER
A,
PIPE LA
A If 6' `R� T�CCESS TUBE
P
x LACKS ON 4 ME HOLY OVER STONE (,CERGFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
EDGE (2X5 EXPOSED) LITH THE RULES AND REGULATORS
r SO N
MASONRY RING F THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
BRICK CHANNEL APPUES VERTICAL GRANITE CURB CONCRETE PREPARING THIS PLAN.
TO DROP CONNECTIONS AS OCR A
THRUST 8 -A
WEILL AS CONVENTIONAL, DETAIL L 6-GR,E VALVE -----------------
A (NOT TO SCALE) —IF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS -WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
USED. 00 NOT BLOCK DEAN
PLAN SLOPED GRVANTE COBS
SP� TIED
C' I S 1,
25 LOPE
MR ,EAL
GIC+-ELIJ
LORE I/_ WALL
PC fL.W'PE
P
X LACK'
EDGE (2
SIR CK C
TO ED
W*4' REV L WATER MAJN
LAYER TOP COURSE \_PROMDE CUBIC YANG OF
SHELF allAnON SAME AS �YF R BINDER COURSE ANCHOR�NG BE SELECTED 2- STONE - 70 6'
SLOPE 1-/FT------ CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE. DENSE GRADED CRUSHED EORAN CALE i IN7 PROVIDE 12' SQUARE BY 6-INCH THICK] ABOVE HYDRANT DRAIN
STONE CONCRETE BASE UNDER HYGRAMf
WALL OF MANHOLE
POURED CONCRETE BASE CITY OF SALEM
COMPACTED TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT P�NNING BOARD
SEBGRADE
BRICK OR CONCRETE FIUL� CONNECTION FOR HIGH
OR LOW SERVICE LINE ------------
8. SLOPED GRANITE CURB DETAIL ---------------------
DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE)
12' MINIMUM SCREENED (NOT TO SCXLE) ---—---------
GRAVEL BASE
'RICK ON EDGE UNDISTURBED EARTH
SECTION A- -—---—---------
CONCRETE DOLLAR ---—---------
6- HIGH CHECK CAM WHERE SHOWN ON PEAR BITIUMINOUS GONG TOP SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT.
MANHOLE RAN! AN III. COURSE AS SPECIFIED
COVER AS SPECIFIED EXISTING GROUND SURFACE OR B CONIC. BINDER F_APPLY TACK COAT
FINISHED GRACE cff
12" 06RSE AS GREG
AS SREC�F
F�jD
GRAVEL BASE D EXISTING PAVEMEW —------
BRICK FOR GRACE 1-2-CRUSHED C EXISTING BASE
-Z� STORE ONPACTED SUBGSAnE
ADJUSTMENT -——---—--—-—--
�PRECXGL FARASITION SECTION
OR BARREL SECTION WITH
'RECA4F TOP SILAB CARE: —-----
VAJRIES (SEE PLAN)
/--RUBBER '0'-RING GASKET
.7 OR PREFORMED FLEXIBLE
4*-0' UNLESS OTHERWISE- JOINT SEALANT AS SPEC19ED GRASSED SWALE
INDICATED ON DRAWINGS (NOT-.0 SCALE) FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED PAVEMENT MATCH
DETAIL CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAIN
MANHOLE RUNGS —MULTIPLES OF 1'.2.3'.4.5'. 1 (NOT TO SCALE)
OR IF _ENGTHS AS REQUIRED I CATE:
8' MINIMUM CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO
4EIREEN CERTIFY THAT DHE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN By
SEE PIPE CONNECTION KING QATO HAS BEEN RECEIVED.13 RECORDED AT THIS
SHELF ELEVATION SJUME AS THE PLAN
ET.LS THIS SHEET OFFICE AND THAI. NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE, 8- MINIMUM DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
7
IRRE OR 101,014
JAGILE FIM sn,mE TCAWhRD
PLICEr,ON COMIGUIR WOOD POST
12'MINIMUM PI LmD SIDE
IN CKNESS OF B070M SIEXB SCREENED GRAVEL
SHALL NOT BE UESS THAN 2-FE111,115,ITIIEDE PICNM
THE MANHOLE BARREL BRICK OR CONCRETE FII_L� wx FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIIIED
'Ea ON WALL OR TOP STAB &7� it M r
WH:CRC
EVER IS GREATER. RATE
SECTION B-9 NO. RONSON
UNRRSI�JRDED WIRT
T DETAIL SHEET
PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE ANCHOR FABRIC WITH R_ iip
SOIL, IMP EACxnU_ "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
DETAIL MISH GRADE EXISTING GROUND CEO SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
(NOT TO SCALE) SURFACE DIRECTION OF FLOW
OWNER-
+ QARQkRX DRISCOIL-ET I
CARRY FABRIC DOM 18 WALILACE ROAD
INTO FRENCH ED N'MAT 0190,
DEBTS 36055.36056.3GO57
W.� ADS 'Wg'TB
ff'R USE
WOOD POSTS ck W�;,&=RA ESS
BF-O"OBI MAX. 76 OAKVILLE STREET
1-2'CRUSHED L"N. MR,01905
.RTL*I
STORE I OCUS. T
TEMPORARY HAY BALES C AVENUE
FLOW o 6'MiN. NNO.0 elm S3.mMM
SlLTFENCE &?M;Wc; s E�NMSI�O'F
DETAIL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE (NOT TO SCALE) ScAjjE NOT TO scJMEE DETAX SHEET I OF 3
STONE CHECK DAM
r H:E�ET 8 0�Fl 0
(NOT TO SCALE) AUUUSI I..1.�'
TYPICAL H20 INSPECTION PORT DETAIL
PAVEMENT
40' LAYOUT
6 6 FLUOR BOX FRAMBI
SIDE 24 PAVEMENT 2�5 SIDE- ED 45 PVCNPE —BEEN.R-7606 OR Ua�
,ALN R BE 24'SQUARE AN88
WALK am..
0 0
T PLOT!
ASS'C CONCH- To"
CL
:X FAVEMENTESUI
PJXCTEO FILL
REPT;"L OR 510PIO Ec,. gm CCIAPACTED
G, IT,'UK"., FEED CONNECTOR
3/8"'OOT 3/ 8' FOOT— 3 8
F 0 3
0
0
E ZTE "SC
A' 0 T 4 02.NOWWOVEN FILTER FABRIC
3/B FOOT 3/8' FOOT— 3 8 ARGAUNDSMNE.TOPANDSIDES
E'.ONDEPREN
Do G�1-2 INCH BKOFTOM MR
co PUSHED COUPON
WASKEDC' I CERTIFY THAT I HANE CONFORMED
G'L;AA c E wl M.EASCAVE 0 REGULATIONS
UU'_
N
& SEED GAS 01 1 ANDGELON CULTECRaMPO ETHYLENE WITH THE RULES AN
LY OF TLE RE IS IRS
SIDEWALK ON CfAMBEM PRE .OF DEEDS IN
"A
MONA
121" DEAN BUT. SIDES 0 BEINEADUK RmR33GQLHD
I"TC' MX HEAVYOUTYCHAMBERSIDE
TYPE 1-1 8' DI I PVC 2 IN 0.
BINDER ---------
a"OW, GRAII 2C.EL PIPE PER CULTEC MCHARGER 3QQXL NO SURROUNDING
CONCRETE L.D.. WATER 2' WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
1/2. ENIGNEERIDEI AND INSPE
2 1/241301POMERt" �INLET- ASSEM
BTNMlGOJS SEWER INTERNAL FREUD G CRUSH T ----------
I", 24 9NCtflUN 1-2 INCH WASHED CRUSHED) BOTTOM TO FINA I
RAVEL BASE TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION STOWE BENEATH AND (THIS CLA
(NOT TO SONE) ABOUNG CHAMBEE EFOU
A B CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY PLAN VIEW
T NOTE: THE CULTEC MODEL SHOWN HERE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE
EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
0 0 0 PAVEMENT BEFLhCEDBENEATH 4 OZ.MUNI FILTER FASERU
4 CZ.NONEWOVEN FILTER FABRIC NALV FOL24 FEES CCMNKF� ME
21'DIACT, CULIVEC INECHAM(NON 33BA HD CONAPPOZTEI r AROUND WHEN UTILIZING
NrERMAL NAMIRCUD MANNGXYCEN�
(3 FLAT rFlNTNHEO CRUENNED HVLNFC� FFEGCCNNECTmR
MW E TWEAFFNI 1-2 INCH CIA AROUNDSTO TOPANDSIDES
WASH.
RECHARGI STORE WHERE SPECBTFU 1.�I2iHTNI
RAW
A— _13
MINE . . ... ... . . . . . . OLVII52NR]MIN
171MISIANT] WEVIrni"
EXTEND ACOUSS COWNS TO YNIBN MMX Wa
I * ' * * I ' UEoryce.1
PINE MR O� UWAXI IBM.
PAIR—] xErIRTN_j
W KNOCAWT EW EER MGM
OTTE) T, - j SIDEPORTALTOUBECUT MAX.
24 MCHI GUFXC NO.LKA POLYEINFOUN 12,V�"
ENTERELY HtFIELD TO MULOWHVIV
N
OF THE SYT5XFM BUM TX F�N fEB`
_T =.N AS NEEDED
""'C" "MAL"BLE" LNERMSPANTHE f
FC4M NEED COMME
WERNO
4 a' OATYN M.T A CULTEC INTERNAL MANIFOLD DETAIL
BAVN,XU`YU`�A`mARXG.
.R.NRBY.lAG.D`NAmNN.D,'
NOT. 11MCAMTER"FACHL"T. DONSUR TR..
RENSI KLRINXINGANTRINOMMENNEX
1.GON�NNETX U.TSI I...AFTER VI OWS.
I......ED R N-20 IN-C N.KITH ACCORGANCENTI KEW....
RE.C. ..
3.MINGLE 00 GROOVE JNNT BENNO WITH BURY.RUIN, CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SEDIMENT AND OIL SEPARATOR FINSHED GRADE TOP OF 1.5 1 CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN
SLOO" 2�� SLOPE DATE:
(NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING FOUR \\7� CITY OF SALEM
DETAIL UNPAVED PAVED
C
SURFACE FLAT STONES PLANNING BOARD CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO
FOR WA L LIKE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAI OF THIS PLAN BY
CONFIGURATION THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS
PRUNE AS FIELD AND SUE-BASE MATERIAL OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECE.VEO DURING THE TWENTY
DAYS NUT AMER SUCH RECOM AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
DIRECTED BY OWNER TO
IMPROVE APPEARANCE COMMON PILL MATER
(RETAIN NORMAL TREE ——-----
S.APE) COMMON FALL MATERAL 1.5 CITY CLERK
NI ALONE ------—--—--—--
TRUNK FI_ARE
JUNCTION PLANT TREE WARNING TAPE FILTER
1-2*ASI EXISTING FABRIC
JOINTS
GRACE
PERPENDINCLILAR
3'1 SHREDDED PINE
EARN MULCH TO TO TO SLOPE
NO. WEI DATE
OUTERMEOGE OF SAUCER —------
KEEP ULCH 2'FROM
TRUNK DETAIL SHEET
MIN, BOULDER
EkSTING GRADE 12' MINIMUM SEE ORIC NAL SIZE 5OUBB
CUT AND REMOVE DUNLAP, ISN'SCIN CLEARANCE MOM I BELO. GROUND OR —----------- 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
N COMPACTEC
FROM TOP 1/3 OF EENED GRAVEL FU :L.- SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
SCREENED GRAVEL PLACED AGAINST 'R__ PROPOSED
ROOT FALL, IF UNDISTURBED SIDES AND E070M OF GRACE OWNER'
NONSIODEGRADABILL.
REMOVE COMPLEXLY. TRENCH. SEE NOTE I BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
SLOPE VOES OF HOLE SENER OR DEAN 8" MIN SCREENED GRAVEL BEDDING -----—------ 18 WALLACE ROAD
LYNN,MA 01901
SACKFUL AS PER BELOW OUTSIDE DAMI OF PIPE TO CEM 3GO55.36056136057
SPECINCATION 12- DATE: WilL"s
UNDISTURBED EARTH APPLICANT
GO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW NSO REAJ_Tf TRUST SPARAGIES
FOOTBALL NOTES : (&
T�REE TIMES MOTH OF FOOTBALL L7 6"MI1 L LOEI gSo.5 E 9
189HORTHRAMORST
I FOR PIPES OTHER THAN ENO.SELECTED COMMON FILL MAY BE USED MOM PERFORATED 75X OF BASE MUN. I Ocus .10,
T
MID-EXAMETER OF PIPE TO 12*ABOVE TOP OF PIPE ONDEPORAJIN ROCKS Tc BE LMRK AVENUE sALbML MA s IBODUERSKMA.'"N,
DECIDUOUS TREE 100C E35 OR ASSESS RS REFERENCE, now"'c"An"B80"
PLANTING TRENCH DETAIL FOR GREATER IWXE 0.)IM"4210
&ANCE,'.
4 CNAL DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 3
DETAIL GRAVITY PIPE RIP-RAP DETAIL SCALE:NOT�SCALE
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) �NOT TO SCALF) AIJGIJ� SHEET 9 OF 10
f 14,2015
A
DRAIN MANHOLE TOWEE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FRAME&MAR FINISHED GRAIDE FRAME&GRATE
FINSPED IMAGE "PUES 1.NWIM NVELHOLE FRAME AND OR FINISHED CRAFT ONERD GRAM �.7W
OR CKS AND A TAR MORTAR
TO'BE USED 7TMAKE O-INGN FLAT TOP COI AS SPECIFIED M.-AND MONTAN
GRADE ADJUSTMENTS G.RS TO SUPPORT AN 1.BE.BE.1.MAE, ]IFLONG AND WORTAR
H-20 LOAD FEEP) GRAM AD,Jll.ORS TO BE USED TO MAKE
X K'OPENING 11PHOLE TO BE 12-INCH G.IMS 1. MADE ADJUSTMENTS
CONCRETE COLUMN MIN 8'FLAT TOP 4 SUPPLIER TO PROWDE
12 �l )LA.M. BRICK FOR GRACE PREAE1 I.MWER GELLERT AN H-20 LOAD
MADE
a
To BE USED I
OF 'GI GRAD,WAS,
=V RS OHO
PREP I IF AD
SCOT ON WOE..a TO
ADJUSTMENT C FOR
.F PRECAST THANSITTLON CONICAL S�M-'�'
SECT 0, BARREL WEEPHOUE TO BE
SECT WIF4 PRECA�T AS'-=IT'DIAMETER IREC0SI IN FIGER
AGER STICTI,
INLET IPE TOP SL_kB
MELEE
/-RUNTEER "0' RING
PRI AST�METC IN
PANELC WIN MIRCE CASKET OR PRE-
INFILTRAG N CASH AR ROM =C, FORMED FLEXIBLE NORMAL OU AGE OF FIRE
S �G
OR A
JOINT SEALKNT ARR 21 MARAROE RISEN SECTI
LOWL
BETIV FEE
MANHOLE RUNGS CATIN BASIN TRW L`4 7 BE FIFE
WATER
M, NORNME. CUTS B
VULTIPLES OF EASE GFCTIGN__� 12-MARANEE
GLISDE OF PIPE 23.�,5 OR 6 IFT L-ML
12-MINIML. f CLEARANCE LENGTHS AS RED D
GOGOOES I k_LIE 4'-D" UNLESS OTHERWISE 1101 BASIN TRAP
By% NBSTURSED EARTH INDICATED ON DRAWINGS w
CASE BEEFOR
SECTION
(2)1 DRAM
NLANFIAE DOWNS
GOWEN.MA. U.IDISTER..LANTE
12"MINIMUM SCREENED GRAVEL PRECAST DOUBLE-CRATE CATCH BASIN ......
GRAIN D R A IN TAPE SCREENED GRA�I_ H.IREIG EARTH
P E DETAIL
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM S`W 3"MINIMUM CONCRETE FILL (NOT TO SCALE)
SHALL HOT BE LESS THAN COUPLE GRATE
THE MANHOLE BARREL PRECAST CATCH BASIN
SECTION WALL OR TOP SIULB
WHICHEVER IS GREATER -UNDERFEED EARTH DETAIL
PRECAST CATI BASIN (HOT TO SCALE)
PRIME SINGLE CHAR
MANHO'
BUTE
LEFT
I P
F
COAST CA T
&PR I
PLAN PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE LEGBO STAMPS
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL GRATE
DETAIL (NOT TO SCORE)
QNCT TO SCALE) CITY OF SALEM
- PLANNING BOARD
INST LED BETWEEN
AL
,HE CREATE AND FRAME
ARBIRCE TFY THAT t HAA CONFORMED
R
THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
PREPARING TEBS PLAIN
Pt AN
S CTION CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE P�El ---------------- WILLIAMS BE SPARAGES LLC
L_
A-A DI -------- SECTION UETEE.STRW
1. CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO A-A F
HEREETY CERTIFf TREAT THE NOTICE OF APPRONIA_ OF THIS PLAIN BY
2-0. C, CHE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECERED AND RECORDED AT THIS S 0' ---—--------
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY 4' 0'
DAYS NEV AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAME NOTICE
GMEN
----------------------
RK
IFnT-F
OPEN THROAT MINOR SOONER TIMP OR
CURB I BEEF. I I Lu. i. I -J 11 OPEN THROAT GRANITE EM.
1.7-171 ELEVATIO
-171, GERG `R�""ON DATE: --—----
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP
PRECAST DETAIL
CATCH PRECAST (GOT TO SCALE)
BASIN SECTION CATCH !!7
BASIN
A-A OF.THREAT MAI SE
CURB SUCLI A�TTGN
ELM
3 FLANGE CATCH BASIN PLANE PLAN
AND CASCADE MAR UVERATTON
12 ED OR AR FORMED VOLNE. NO. BORROW MIT
GRAPERE
HIE LOW RIGHTS ESE UPHABI MR. I SECTION
EARN O.A PRIME.0 MOE ALL.SE IAMRL DETAIL SHEET
V SACKS AND MORM, LV-24AB-2 BLAME"TH EKING MAWS ON SUMER "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVSION
TO BE USED TO MAKE AND LI GRATES*LOW BOWES By LEBANON
GRACE ADJUSTMENTS FAADF�.NO Of DRMKTOK.MA OR EQUAL.
FRAMPT R MATE BRI AND MORHAR 281 (SET AT FINGER COURSE.0 RESEI AT SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
TO HF BELOW FINISH FAVORER)
6 �ME USED TO WAKE OWNER
SARMS AND.0. BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
48' CAROM J- 10 SEE USED 10 MI 18 WRLACE FREAD
IIII.CAMET. FRAWE.BRA 18'111.DMARTER, �2 GRACE AINESTMENTS LYNN. Ak 01901
ME RR TO GOING 3W55.36056.36057 C( WlLLL4LMS
ORGMS AND MOREAR
PRECAST PREGAV GRIGASI ECAST APPLICANT,
-0
GATE BAS 0
MPRF�ST NOE OCRI
CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN CATCH:EASIN NSO BMW TRUST SPARAGES
7 76 DA LEE STREET
EFOR
40'El'EXAMETER
1_;� _�N."I OiMI5�
FLUATION SECTIQN ELEVATION SECTION PROJECT LOCUS MORE IIH
y 119—NABB
A-A A-A CLARK AKENUE SALOU MA ANDBURO..."HENH.
ASSESSORS REFERENI BROM,01.1 ERRI
MAET 6 PARI 7, 8& 9 s F.01.1 lHI
GRANITE CURB INLET GRANITE CURB INLET DETAIL SHEET 3 OF 3
DETAIL DETAIL
2 SCAI NOT TO SCMUE
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCAJ�E)
0 SINGLE CUTE COUPLE GRATE "GUST 174, SHEErlOOF10
A.
L, CASE 7159 CLERKS CZRFFICATON ON -HE PLAN SEE PROFILE SHED I
DATE: -—---—------—--
HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE NCL�RN OF THE Cl�OF SAFE., DO
ONCE OF A'FPROVAL OF THIS 1. 81
BEEN RECEWO AND RECORDED AT THIS
HE PLANNING BOARD HAS
OFFICE.0 FlAT NO AP-EAL E EWO DURING THE TWENTY
DA� NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEV�X RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE k
------aTY CLEI----------
WICERTIFY THAI I HXvE CONFORMED
ffH THE RULES AND REGUI_XTIONS
XN,NTK,
1,H,. OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS 14
PREPM14G THIS PLAN.
OPEN
AA
A
n SPACE BID
h/00 0 ......
OR,
WN.
A N,
ICL
W,SMEI CITY OF SALEM
IF PLANNING BOARD
V) ---—------—--
K/RP
TI—E
Tz. ZEE BIT. SIOEMLN�
X"'PT GRA�EL
R`Cf
-------——-——-——
LOA. SEED
0
0 X 4:4. IT'ACP KIN.U.
3/8'01 HOLE 1/2'
DEEP AT ACT AL —----------
R'C'
-EXISTI�G OWE POINT OF SUO
REFERENCE
ED 48"
7,\ DISTUREED
REMG� V OF EXISTING SOIL
--------—--
FAR 7H
X I -
& REPLACE W/3' MINUS
TRAIL DETAIL CRUSHED STONE -T ---------
A __?NF (NOT TO SCALE)
SRI DATE
PR 0 _AYGI
I gg�i E—Z LINE
a
FINISHED GRACE
GRANITE BOUND
DETAIL
(HOT TO SCALE) G DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
ITT.. WITH A ORtUL HOLE TO BE SET.
COMMON TULL MATERIAL 6'CNTRLAP (I
LE
Is SIDEWALK "A
m 5.0 X G
ECTEXTILE FABRIC 7. V
NO. �N I DATE
_ANDING' DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
TTFII a. 2' GRMB� PLOT
1.5%' CROSS SLOPE
3/8'To 3/4� TOWARD S ED FOR SOUTH RIDGE CIRCLE
50'VC -1.00% 5 WASHED GRA10_ FIR
EST PROPOSED RAMP .1 DRAINAGE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
WE AT END OF CURB A GRASS PLOT OWNER
,. I BARBARA DRISCOLL E' AL
J6 J" 'IN I A *N I
Sis;i - IS WALLACE RQA�
cAlum-F35m
0+0 4"PERF� CORR. HOPE LYNN, MA 01901
M, 0.50 1,00 I+m 2+00 2+50 (HOLES WIND UP) L.1 NNAUWAY LC COPTS 36055.36056.36057
N, 8__ RENTAL "HAN CURB L APPLICANT' WILIJAMS
6 AT END
NSD REXLT�TRUST SPARAGES
0 SOUTH IU J'k&
0 6 6 ____—BNKXSF.R8ED DART. PLAN CEMENT CONCRETE 76 �ALUE STA ET
MIN� P
Tj
Y B\RIEFIU�I�NCE IT'
I I t RIDGE 4 5-0 _EVEL LAXDING'WITH LYNN. MA 01905E
T
IN + FOUNDATION POINT. DETECTABILE WARNING PANEL PROJECT LOCUS- IONORTHMANSTIOT
CIRCLE + 1.5% - SLOPE FOR DRANAGE .10,
+ + CLARK ANENUE SALEM. MA
UNDERDRAIN ASSESSORS REFERENCE
DETAIL WHEELCHAIR RAMP MAP 6 PANELS 7. B & 9
OF 20' 40' go,
(NOT TO S�E� DETAIL PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 2
2 (NOT TO SCALE) NOTES 21�
l*-40'(HOR)&4'(VERT)
CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE *0.5%
...... I CERTIFY THAT I H�E CGNFORMEC
W H THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
NX. 8 17) or TIE REGISTERS OF DEEDS I%
N OPEN SPACE 1 PREPARING THIS PLAN
-------------------
WILLIAMS SPARACES LLC
=SEG
HE 0 HE ---------
I N-IMM
IV
S-0 RAT UDEJ
M.
w'IMX,
TO. '4m-
AQ ----- .NOS
NZE0 IV IN.I...
12
YFATIO
TV�1.1
`!'.
�4XH.
XM
RY V=I.,.
Stk�.o
RN-127.7+`X` M'
12' ..1!U25 X—1.
A I ,0U. CIT'T' OF SALEM
A, P�NNING BOARD
OF IIDI SEE PROFILE SHEET 2
'T" VL XFOO.TF 11.14-1. L. n,8 ------
13&0 ERRHX,,MMOGRE
EXIST, I,. D Am
---—-—---------------
FKL I...
V RCF 31..
I
CLTK,S CER71FICAVON ON THE PLAN
45
I CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO
HEREBI CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPRMA�OF THIS PLAIN BY
THE PLANNNG BOAR) HAS BEEN RECEWED AND RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT NI I APPEAL WAS RECEI�D DURING THE �ENTY` ELI
�YG NEXT AFTER S JCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF END NOTICE.
--—--------------------
CITY CLERK
V) L)
-----------—--- ——--
DATE: —-—------
A,
A
M�
.2- AT.
NH
4.9
7
2,
- As fl; BON
-9 TO- DENOTES A GRANITE STONE
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE ELAO
mi A
mav
A. LLI
CE NO. IBCI
D.v
LLJ 'N
>
< WOODLANDS ROAD
8 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
NJ OWNER
BARBARA DRISCOLL ET Al-
18 WALLACE ROAD
UHN MA 0"90"
N.
LC CERTS 36055,36D56.36057
3
O.VCt�5412 APPLICA WILLUMS
vc— NED REALI- TRVSF SPARAGES
IS �ULE STREET
LYNN. MA 01— OATH
gA PROJECT LOCUS
18 2 9 C A, 4; 8 a
9 1 ;i ;; 0 z ;; I z I I g -r
'"WIN
CLARK ANEHUE SALEM. MA
DATUM.
1+00 1+50 B.50 7+50 8� +50 ASSESSORS REFERENCE 1XIM
125�00 0 0 0.50 2+00 2+5D 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 l+QU s
I M -- MAP 6 PARELS 7. 8& 9 .01MI'l-um
A
0 p
T 8 A, ROFILE SHEET I OF 2
8 WOODLANDS ROAD 2
8 I'-40(HOFO&4'(,.n SHEET 4 OF 10
8
+
CLERKS CERTIFICATION OR THE PLAIN
N I IST OF WAIVERS RFOUEST�O DATE:
I.SECTIO IV A,1.1 WHICH RECURES A MINIMUM CONTEMINC RAMI OF TWO HUNDRED THIRT� CLERK OF THE CM OF SALEM. 00
IAEREBY COMIN THAT THE NOTICE .1 APIROVM-.1 THIS PLAN BY
FEET FOR CURVED EFFECTS,MD. IN PI-ACE THEREOF,ALLOW THE RGAII LINVOUT AS
N� (230)
SHOWN ON PLAN& THE Pl-NNNIHG BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED.0 RECORDED AT THIS
OFFICE AND THAT No ApPCAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE Tl
-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN DA� NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT WHO RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
2.SECTON V A.4.0 WHICH REQUIRES CUL
LENGTH,AND IN PLACE THEREOF.ALLOW A LEMON OF 10a9G3 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN
ON PLAINS.
3.SECflON N RIGNT OF WAY IMPIRDSMENTS POLICT WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3
CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER.MD. IN PEACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2)TREES PER LOT.
NOTE THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS
LOCUS I CER,�THAV I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
PREPARING THIS PLAN
VICINITY W �PIRAZES LUC
1"=800'±
N
1�.. ALFRED A 1. AXON,A
...,A, .1 SADUEFXE� IEF
/N\ 07-NXA :1-XNN 0/ ..../GN V V. CONA If
LCONARK, THXF R'NUNQN'
NI 07-QDN' OT-.1.
1. VERTIM DWFU. UNKNOWN(SEE NOTE 2) — I .,-.R AXWOU. LEGEND OF �CMBOLS WIND ABBRIEDIATIONS
2 EXISTING PROPERTY SOUNDARY,TOFOGRAIPHY ARE UTIUMES ARE AS SHOWN ON THE �HAPD t OD'v 2
P��OUSLY APPROVED DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION BY THE CITY OF SALEM (IJUl 3.2008 0,J., MONTORM WELL
DECISION) ENUTLED -DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN. CHAPEL HILL.ENNUEM. MAEOSACHUSETTS'
GATED JUNE 28,2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26. 2007 BY EASTERN LAND SUI FIRE NNVRAMT
3. WETILAND RESOURCE ARE)k BOUNDARIES REGRE DELINEATED BY VHU-M5&SIPMAGES 2 WATER DATE
4. THE CONTRACTOR S�BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE 4 OPEN SPACE 1
LOCATION SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILOCS, SHOWN OR NOT SHI ON CATCH BASIN CRAVO
IN
THESE PlANS. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCNON. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE MONFIED IN D 5 UNUTY PULL
WRITING OF�UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AN ELLEN
APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCCEOING WITH P,IE WORK N'K UGHT POLE
5. TRENCHES CUT IWO EXISTING PAVEMENT BE HI PATCHED. 6 GRAIN MANNI
6 ALL WATER MRS SHA-L BE B- DIAMETER CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON 7�, 13
(C_-DI ) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 14 SEWER WASHOLE
7. ALL GRI SEWER LINES SHALL,BE III DIAMETER SDR 35 PVC PIPE, 12 15 CONIC .CONCRETE
8 WATER WHO SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION 16 9 10 11 SBOH- .HE POIRD.11- OUE
OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF IS INCHES SHALL BE MUNTIANED NO.FOUND
WHERE WATER AND ENDS LINES CROSS. 17 WOR.WHEEL CHAIR AWAR
9. A-L STORM GRAINS SHA-L BE NIGH-DENI P0LYETHYUENE PIPE (HDPE) UNLESS TRAH�14
GTHIERNSE NOTED ON PLAIN. II.TY TILM N/F- NOW OR FORMERLY
10. MINIMUM PITCH FOR ALL CHAIN UNIES SHAUL BE CIE. z ROD-IRON ROD
It z 19 TWEE
ii. ELECTRIC, GA!I.TEUEPHONC ARM CABLE",SERACES SHALL BE INSTALLED NOCLE 24
UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE uffll�AGENCY HAVING A JDANNA 25 ANIFING CONTOUR
WAC,VNKk
URISDICTION. .-NIT
12� ST FET TREES SHUM-L BE PLANTED AT TWO(2) PER LOT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR 4,14% 26 PROPOSED CONTOUR ------
PLAN.SEE REQUESTED AVER. Clk EWE OF FRAGMENT ------UP------
20 23 VOC
13 FIRE ALARM BOX INSTALLATION AND UOCKTIOI S�I- BE IN ACCORDANCE RUN THE VORTGAL GRANDE CURB
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT. 22 SHNI LT FENCE
14 TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROADRATS INTO DRIVEWAYS SHMMUL BE MADE USING
RADIUS GRIONTE CURBS. PROPOSED SPOT DLENANKNN
15. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION (TO .1 SHOWN AT�LATER DATE) SH&L BE IN SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT CF PUBLIC WORKS.OR. OTHER
APPROONG AUTHORITY.
16. THE SUBJECT PROREM DOES HOT LIE WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS A
(SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1%M�CHANCE ROOD AS SHOWN ON
"I
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 25c,09I .0 REVISED JULY 16. 201..
17. PROPOSED FOUNDATION UNDERDRANS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE TOWARDS THE STREET 27
OPEN SPACE 2
C434 0
CDWIC,
CIN OF EALEM 51
PLANNING BOARD 3 NN,,hWWWW.UNN-
SHISHI
NodWWIK
G-191.9;EMPAW;.1
ON
LYNN SAND&
C/o NONCCUL INDEX PLAN
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
�XWI SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
CARRIER
BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
18 W�E ROAD
LVNN MA 01901
------------------- ERTS 3605536056.36057 WILLLAMS
'w SPARAGES
APPLICANIL c
RSD BMW TRUST
75 OAKVILLE STREET C
PLAN SET INDEX LCH, MA 01905 39NO-MMUN-DIT
T
PROJECr LOCUS 101
SHEET 1: INDEX PLAN PLAN REFERENCES, CLARK AVENUE E. NA ..."Al
SU s IAX:017%53�.
B M��E�bf E; .0.1 01.)11W-m
SHEET 2-3: DEFINITIVE PLANS 1) LAND COURT PLAIN 7159-9 MN�
2) LAND COURT PLAIN 7159-X 40' SO' 160,
SHEET 4-5: DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILES ——--------——-- 3)LAND COURT PLAN 7159-2
N D PI-NH ENTITLED 1DEFINI SUBDIVISION PLAIN.CHAPEL HILL.SALEM.
�=HURECJCS�DE
SM CATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BT SHEET 1 OFII
SHEET 6-7: TOPOGRAPHIC PLANS ...
DATE ------ EASTERN LAND SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3. 2000 DECISION W SALEM PLANNING BOARD), A—UGUST14 015
IT SHEET 8-11: DETAIL SHEETS
GEORGE
JEMETLE H. TORION GAL L FA-HO IN
07-0008 ALFRED& LOAN JOSEPH 07-0003 LORRAINE M.
FRAHNEOLLUCIAND
LOUISE P SUDSON PAUL. PAULETTE�JOHN C0WNE IUR ESMA HYSENESHI
07-OCK35 & SCOTT UEELANC MUST
W76 07-0002 `WLM ML MONROE. JFr
1 07-0004 07-0086
ESAM Y�ABDOUGADIR
07-OODI
RICHARD L ODAY
03-0137
>/
GM. p OPEN SPACE 1 CONFORMED
- Or AREA=168,388 S.F. XCM�F P"UL EGURATIONS
LOT 2 1.
7 981 LOT (44J00± S.F. WETILANDS) OF THE REGISTERS OFTEN IN
S.F. - 7.412 MCIPARING THIS PLAN.
t% .07
A�
----------------
LOT 4
k WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
7.492 S.F.
4 F, 4
7.805 S.F. A -------
WM, 4 5 173� ------
9-14 U 1 &F.
Ivoo G,
...FIR M. &
ELLEN TO
3�
3�
M,
-lJ 02 6 Rol, LOT 6
ROADWA OP 0
y v 7aO3 S.F.
EASEMENT "I'V LOT 1.3 1':
CrTt OF SALEM
9.147 S.F. LUF 14 PI-ANNING BOARD
:� -:t?q
6
LOT 12 LOT 15
11.127 S.F. 7.L2096T 1
S.,
R
0 aiji"NE, 44
MM
9 S.F.
LOT a OT
798
10
6.370 S, ..LOT�F. Lm
wr 16 6.78:
10.245 S.F.
.1.1 . , - �..l.
26-
LOT 17 qg
A
lik, �-21 W1
4
'TRAN 2014 21W LOT 18 -0�12
R
�EALT,TREX ll.W S.F.
06-0019 TADEUSZ & 4
JOANNA LOT 19
EMCI.OWSRI
06-0017
DATE:
11%498 S.F. CONMEW"
.4 COMMISSION
1w.
2.�SJF 06-0011
lx� LOT 25 r; 7-6
Soo V'. - i - i -1 e
7.90�1 S.F.
PLAN REFERENCES- 2�/ 74� 1?/D //Y 1B.-
-, L/,,�, ILI ZIP
7�S.F.
W1,
1) LAND COUNT PLAN 7 59-9 -s' S
2) LAND COURT PLAN Mg-X R.IM
3) 0 RE PLAN 7159-2 LOT 20 LOT 23
LAN COU
UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED 'DEnNffi`fE .,c
4)AN 4,7011 S.F. U51 S.F.
SUBDNTSJON PLAN. CHANEL HILL, SALEM. A.
RIVOISED CqL
�SACHUSETTTS�DATED JUNE 28. 2006 A,
THROUGH OCTOBER 26. 2007 BY EASTERN "NO V _ED
SU ZONE LINE
(SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY LOT 22
7.630 S.F.
SALEM PLANNING BOARD)
Z,
DENOTES A GRANITE STORE BOUND
A ,G". WITH A DRILL ROLE TO BE SET.
THE PLAN v
CLERKS CERGFICATION ON 4��. w"'
DATE: P, 2
IZ/07j20T$
3
CLERK OF THE CITY OF S&EM. GOT A/ n.=!.9 L=
'-EREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTIC OF APPRMAI-Or.THIS PLAN BY N --9/412015
THE PLAHNING BOARD HAS BEENERECENED.0 RECORDED AT TRIS GM.GN`
OFFIC AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWS� SURMA MCI IMPRISON
DAYS ENEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NORCE.
ISABELLE V DEFINITIVE PLAN
06-0015
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
------------
CITY CLERK
OPEN SPACE 2 p SALEM, MASSACHUSE17S
—------------
OWNER'
LOT 27
AREA=135,070 S.F. SAREMA QNI�G.U- �l
(47�500± S.F. WET�ANDS) 147.992 S.F. 18 WALLACE MAGI
LYNN MA 01901
U,CLIES 36055.36056.36057 -w
APPUCANI, -.1L
,& WILLLAMS
I IST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED NSD REALTY TRUST SPAltAGES
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTI
ZONE: ONE-FAMRLY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY 76 �IULE STREET
DRI) 00 DRI) CLUSTER LSECTION V kl.f MICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERUNE RJ,DRL OF TWO HUNDRED THIRW LYNN, MA 01905
AS T 1"NMHMMAN-
(230) FEET FOR CURNED STREETS.MD. IN PLACE THEREOF,ALLOW THE FOADVAY PET I OCUS MTS 10,
FACE: 100 FT 150 ET (NONE) SHOWN ON PLANS. OPFN SPACE CALCULATIONS, C K AIENUE SN-EM. MA
OT K- PARIC MIS)53�WWMF
OF WIDTH: 100 FT ISO F (NONE) SOO FEET IN s FAWMMR�I.-.
.:,N:M L FRON
1U. L TOTAL PARCE M�750.538 Sr.
SMEM NOT TO EXCEED MAP 6 PARELS 7.8 & 9
SY, 40.000 SF, (NONE 2.SECEON N M.0 MICH REOUIRES CVL-DE-SAC MIN, OPEN SPACE REQUIRED - 350.10 S.F. (20%OF TOTA-)
MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15.00G) LENGTH Of IGB9G3 FEET MR �AS SHOWN E REQUIRED)
LOT COMMAKE By BUILDING 30% 459 wx LENGTH,AND IN PLACE THEREOF.ALLOW A
�IMIJM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 R 35 FT ON PlJJNS. (MIN, OPEN SPACE UPLAND REQUIRED - 75.054. WHICH IS 50%OF OPEN SEX 0' 2V 40' 80,
OPEN SPACE PRWDED = W3.45B S.F, DEFINITIVE SHEET 1 OF 2
MINIMUM MOW YARD 15 FT 30 FT IS FT 1SECTION V RICK OF WAY MPRDI POUCY WHICH RECLINES STREET TREES TO BE 3 (OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROODED � 211,8511t Sr)
PER LOT.
N�MUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT F` 10 FT CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER.MD. IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO(2)TREES
M MUM REAR YARD: 30 Ft 30 FT 30 FT It 4t ..l. I ADGUST 14.2071, --� SHEET 2 OF I I
NOTE:THE APPLICANT RESUMS THE RIGHT TO MEND THIS UST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS
--AP 11.127&F. A,
1546
7.296 S.F.
O.-L
LOT 9
LOT a
5.370&F. 6.798 S.F. IF R F.—..l.
WLA. 10
LOT 16 - I
'WE
Wa M V
�,-I
..UPY _,,2?X 17"
L V
LOT 17 8
PXW, 8.2M&F.
SFF
A.
4
ul" R�27t.00 I
S 21�
N T KAX. "E
THAN 2014 LOT is
It DM�W u `Jt 11,6"S.F. U." WOODLANDS
-0 .7��
oft TADEVSZ &
J. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
ROAD
BARCIROWSKI WTH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
06-0017 A, LEFT 19 OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEM IN
10498&F 4z CDNSMEWMATION
PREPARING THIS PLAN.
LOT Zt
p COMMISSION
-A IZ(Q$S S.F. B .6 06-0011
k -------------------
LOT 25 WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
21. 9
7.904 S.V
m LOT 26
& 7.853 S.F.
-I
W,
Lar 20 V., 23
14,700&F.
V.-T, 8.251 S.F
A 1p
L D I�oCjjjoN R�
v
-1�21 NE
LOT 22 ZONE Ll
2 7.620 S.F.
14� LOT 21 0
9.�S.F.
21
SUI&
SABEI-LE WIRYO
06-0015 CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
-——-—----—----------
OPEN SPACE 2
AREA=135,070 S.F.
(47,500± S.F. WETLANDS) Lar 27
147.292 &F. F
DATE,
JAMES E. CONNICK
06-0005
IS- DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
REDDENT& RESIDENTIAL It
ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL. ONE-FANILY
QRl) (1) (RI)CLUSTER SAX,." At, —
M:N:��. LOT FRONTAGE too Ft 150 FT (NONE) 3
N U LET IMI too FT 150 FT (NONE) 2
MINIMUM LOT ARI� 15.000 sr� 40.00&F. (NONE) LYNN SAND STONE
B LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: wx 45% 30% C/O AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 40,
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF EI 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT 06-0012
DEFINITIVE PLAN
M;N MUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT
7 N: UJA SIDE YARD 10 FT 30 FT to r "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
MINIMUM REAR YARD. w FT 30 Ft Do R
SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
OPEN SPACE CALCULATI05; QWNER-
TOTAL PARCEL ARDk=750.5218 S.F. BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
la UACE ROAD
I IST OF WAIVERS R MIN OPEN SPACE REOUIRED - 150.108 S.F. (20% OF TOTAL) WAL 111 0190,
EQUESTED (MIN. OPEN SPACE UPLAND REGUIRED � 75.054,WHICH IS 501 OF OPEN SPACE REOUIRED) LYNN
LC CLRYS 36055.36056,36M7
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN OPEN SPACE PROVIDED - 303.458 S,P -W, WILUAMS
RUNE RADII of TIMID HUNDRED THIM (OPEN SPACE UPIAND PROVIDED 211.858t &F) AI
I�SECTICN N&I f WHICH REOUIRES A MINIMUM CONTE
DATE: (2250)FEET FOR CURVED STREETS,ANO, IN PLACE THEREOF.ALLDW THE ROADWAY!LAYOUT AS NSD REALTY TRUST SPARAGES
SHOWN ON PLAINS. 76 OAKVILLE STREE
J, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO LYNN, MA,01905
2.SECTION N A-4.a WHICH REOUIRES CVL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN LOCUS. OUTTENH
HEREBY CE F(THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN SY OJECT
E NT y 111--N—
IN PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECENED AND RECORDED AT THIS PUN REFERENCES'
LENGTH.AND IN PLACE THEREOF. ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FECT FOR READ AS SHOWN CLARK AVENUE SALEU. MA DoLDOW.M"olM,
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY ON PLANS.
n S m
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AkJD RECORDING OF SAID NOnCE. 1)LAND COURT PLAN 7159-8
HDOX NAP 6 PARELS 7. 8& 9 FAUNROLU..
2LSECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POUCY WHICH REOUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 j 2) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-X
4 CALIPER. W FEET ON CENTER,AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT, 3)LAND COURT PAN 7159-2 MA W 20- 4V w DEFINITIVE SHEET 2 OF 2
----—---- 4) AN UNRECORDED PLAIN ENTITLED -DEnNlTTVE SUEDNISION PLAN.CHAPEL HILL. SALEM. —i
NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS, QUIFED JUNE 28. 2006 REVISED THROLGH OCTOBER 26, M07 BY SCALE,]-=� I —
EASTERN LAND SURVEY(SEE MARCH 3, ZOOS DECISION BY SALEM PLANNING BOARD), 015 i SHEET 3 OF I I
AUCUST 14.2 1
CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE KIM SEE PROFILE SHEET 1
DATE:
2@7 CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO
HE HEW CERTIF THAT LIKE NOTICE OF AFI OF THIS PLAN BY
OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEN-WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY
THE PLANNING'BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT 7NIS
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT ME RECORDING OF SAD NOTICE. IT
'P
R CITY
ap ,
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEM IN
AN-1 i=!lKL
ONORKIE I.I. PREPARING THIS PLAN.
Ir W, l.i.
OPEN P -------------------
0 SPACE WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
Bit,UVALLI
INFLITAXON INSIN 2
oo'o On v=,IV
BF NAXPI.
",AI
A.- TO ONX...n
"I SPLUARY
CII OF SALEM
n RIPHAP/ PLANNING BOARD
11 In
IN,
P, If
20 Ir FES w
OCT ,AaA MA
PUD.M.. I
ARRI FES
r PRIKO, WRO.SMAX
z r(N,P0[:
in AMI
gz�' w.In
W ROP.-II.
0
CATE
LEGEND OF SfMBOLS AND ABBREAAElONS
]jig
MONITORING ln�
TIME HYDRANT
lift
AT;!
WATER DATE
CATCH WISH(DRAN) 0 in
in
UTILITY POLL
LIGHT MILE DENOTES A GFMFTE STONE BOUND I )fd
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET.
D,M,MANNOLE @
GOWER MANIOLE
A CONC-CONCRETE
SBIDH .STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE 3 PNI .......
..NPRA I I ,Ainm
EZ5 IN.-POI
i WR.*KEEL CHAIR FAMP
r An N/F . NOW OR FORMERV
B DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
ROD � RON ROD SOUTH RIDGE CIRCLE
TnEE
I� OF WAIVERS REQUESTED SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
POSTING CONTOUR —,K— R.
—50'vc -1.00%— 5C I.SECTION W A.1.1 WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF CNO HUNDRED THIRTY
n M DRISCOLL ET AL
(230) FEET MR CURVED STREETS,MD.IN PLACE THEREOF. ALLOW THE ROADRAY -AYOUT AS PROTMI CONTOUR ------aa�— 18 WI ROAD
SHOWN ON PLANS.
K8 a U, LINN, MA 01901
V, 9 .9 4 2 S RE IN EDOC Or P�VENI UC CERTS 36055.3W56.36057 VVILLLAMS
sia -- - ECTION N A 4 a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC ST EM NOT TO EXCEED SOO PEEL VOC
i— Og E CURB APPLICAM'
CATUM-135.00 UENM.AND IN PLACE THEREOF,ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089,03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOW. VEROCA. NAAR
01 '.CO 1150 2+00 2.50 NSO REALTY TRUST SPARAGES
ON PLANS. 76 OMICLE STREET
T�N'MA
:'LT PENCE BUTTE HOT
SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAI IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WNICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3
SOUTH PRO PROJECImr,
IL CALIPER. M FEET ON CENTER.MD. IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2)TREES PER LOT, POSED PDT EUENGION T
2 Ct,ARK AVLNUI, MA
RIDGE + SURFACE ll�DIRECTION NKON ON)QnKnOW,
T
s
PAC(IND X'tKUXR
NOTE THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MEND TITS LIST WRING THE PERMIT PROCESS. ASSESSORS REEFRENCE
CIRCLE I MAIP 6 PARELS 7
+ T PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 2
00 + 0' 2D' go,
I'-40'DlGR,),&',fERERT) T 5 OF I I
MI 14 S SHEE
I CERTIFY�T W C WORMED
4 WIN THE BLILIS AND RED :�N
PREPARING THIS PLIH DGUL,%TO S
OF THE REGISTERS OF DEDS
SIR,
BE, qEN SPACE I
VTJELA�M SNWALGIPS LUC
Eff PUB ------
"WE RIM^"
WIN
5 (6) --------I�k
Q* P-;i7-; '"Pl' —NU,
IIH. —KHW
4-WROL
M IDN"W",
de-
Nla EMPH
Ir N,`RITUUNl
IN 14
:2 LD
8
TF-I 1:00
CIF
PBROGG,1. RNH,
..NNWU: P, . , I, f WMWWW—
WES W., VIET UI
PRIMB,
ER
17
RMI I-NN
CITY OF SALEM
im. PI_ANNiNG BOARD
1Z %P 76=IV EE PROWII 2 G "n.
. ),.1.
PREIR... IN
EWT... RNMIM42.3, 0
?oW OF I. .....in"
SPLUM,.l=.,, a-IRSTRISE I� —--—-------
NlI IV. 1.
U2...."IJEO
lcl\
% 24
LEGEND OF STDWI AND
McWMRM IT
F.E 7-
INTER WE
-j 0 ------
MILE FQ,
CLERKS CE"FiCATION ON THE PLAN 0
HWPW, V)
El mm:
PRINN NNNI,W, Q W W1 I SECD..I Ill WHICH REMUINEE A CONTI RADI OF TK0 HUMMED THIRTY(230) MET
I, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. GO MR OURWED STREETS,MO.IN PUI THEROW,..THE R...AS SNI ON PLAI
HERESY CERTIFF THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROMW1-OF THIS PLAN BY I I
TH PCMNN V 2.BECHON N 14.0 WHIGH NEWIRES CUL-DE-BAC STREETS NUT ID EXCEED 500 TEST IN TROTH.MO IN
E ING BOMD HKS BEEN RECERRED AND RECORDED AT THIS N �E THEREOF.N-LOW A UKGTH OF 1089.00 FECT MR REEND WS SHOWN ON PUUHS, mn:
ME EWRIET.1 INUE OFFICE WHO THAT NO APPEAL KING RECE� DURING THE T%T� \
M)S NEXT WIFTER SUCH RECEIPT MO RECORDING OF SAD NOTICEr k 1GECTION N RIGHT OF WAY IMPINYWOMONTS MUCT WHICH REOLUSES BRIM TREES TO BE 3 ENMUPER.
THID-FW. FEET ON CENTER.AND,IN P�E THEREOF�UUW TWO(2)TREES PER IT�
NS- N NOT%E XPPUCWNT REEERIEG THE RIGHT TO M�D THIS LIST WRING THE PERMIT RRERCESS�
N/I- ... /I CITY CLERK
RB,
TWEE 0
E.. h
FIRMPREO
EDGE IM PAWTUEEXT
0
BUMTE PRO
Mi
R.RT MK,r
A. an
P"o
SPIR GUI 117- 1 a
LL
THEM MR.
M IS-
IN DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SETI.
lip
N.
V V.X 61
29 M-I R.
P.
LLI
!Ic 'Hum"
z
LLJ
L)> 5r,
DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE
< WOODLANDS ROAD
P. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER,
BARBINFA DRISCOLL U A-
OR
16 W�E ROWD
LYNN. A 01901
LC CORDS 36055,3W56.36057
TT F ru -W,C(& WMLIAMS
6 -50( -1.66%— vc— HIS' RI TRI SPARAGES
a 7 6
LOK TILE STREET
N. MA 01905
3,:R
dfi i 51
HN
MI- CUIAN AVENUE SKLEM. MA
6 1 I's 4. ----N-
-;� 1 14 1 C -I
J= -18 - - I -" T
0 --vig 0 Irl" Fill -12 -4 "
DATU 154 vn 6+,r �+OD I+. .+Do 8+5. 1... IO+w 1 0+50 ASSESSORS REFERENCE' THOMERHO".
"OD �.50 3,CO 3+50 4+00 4+5()1 12 1 S mFoll"m
IF MAP 6 "R-LS 7. 8 & 9
w 0' 20' 41Y w
WOODLANDS RO po PROFILE SHEET I OF 2
9 AD 2
0
+ 0
+ + SIR S SHEET 4 OF I I
+
TRAN 2014
I CERT�TOT I CONFORMED
SALEM WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
MM�124
CONSERW�TTON OF THE REGIS7RS OF DEEDS IN
PREPMING THIS PIUAIT
COMMISSION
("1?z
�A'
ALgD LOC
20 ZONE 0 NE\
CITY OF SALEM
Z
P�LANNING BOARD
..7
SURYA&
ISABELLE IT
"KR*MD
WIRY0
_4 ---------
A..
'A V
—TMNWR UI A
Al
/ / : I GOA.
A4 WF.1 11
W.M.W..-� // f DATE: -——-—-
W,
106
\A7A—
IDS—
WAST D WALM
X
7
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREMTIONS -CON
,-,MiES r. NICK f
MONI WELL 'k
FRE
DEHOTES A GRAHTE STONE BOUND
WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET
CATCH WSIN(DUN)
NTNTHY 2
1210112015
UGHT MILE
I wd.
9149DIS
3. OUE
z
SDIV ME NOL REMMON
TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
CONC . CONCRETE
;,j "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
S8DH- STONE SOUND GRILL HOLE
n 6 I'D
I -0� I SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
v FND.FOUND
WDR-WHEEL CHAIR UNP GINNER'
FAREARA DRISCOLL ET AL
N/F. NOW ON FORNERLY i
18 WALLACE READ
RUD- 1. LYNN MA 01901
LC C�RTS 36055*16056,3W57
-w, WILLLAMS
TNEE 0 RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PI-A TRUST SPARAGES
N
ZONE ONE-FANILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY NED NEAL'TY
EXISINNG CONTOUR ORI) 00 (RI) CLUSTER DATE 76 OAKVI� STREET
LYNN, MA 01905 111—MMN—
PROROWD CONTOUR ECT LOCUS.
A 100 FT ISO IT NONE) CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM. DO MAL W�l Em UNTE I.,
EP MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE NONE) APPRMAL or HIS "LAN AVENUE SALEM. MA DOU110MMAOISM9
I EDGE OF 1.U.T 10) FT 150 FT HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE NOICE OF DIM M".
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECE�D.0 RECORDED AT THIS ASSESqM REFERENCE s
I MINIMUM LOT ARM 15,000 S.F. 40.000 S.F. NONE) OFFICE AND THAT NO AFPEAU-WAS RECEWD DURING THE 1WENW UMILI om'MH`GHW
7 �RTC�G�n CURB LOT COVERAGE T( BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% NAP 6 PARELS 7. 8 & 9
DIkYS N�AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING 01 SAID NOTICE. .1
PROPOSED SILT FENCE MAJUMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 F' N,�I. 0' 2W 4W so, TOPOGRAPHIC SHEEr 2 OF 2
5 FT SO FT 5 "T 1!1�0!1!1
NUM MOW YARD: 0 ; "I —---—------—---- AV V-40'
5 PMD�ED S M:K 0 1 SHEET 7 OF 11
PUT EUEW�TIDN A N:MUM SIDE YARD 0 9 3 F7 Cff CLUERK
MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 3. FT AUGUST 14,lUl I
SURFACE 1.DIRECTION
AFT
PA� TYPICAL H20 INSPECTION PORT DETAIL
40' LAYOUT
RUDER BOX NAME AND BID
v SENT 0 AMC OR NEEMIN R-IT06 OR EQUAL
2C PA�EMENT SIDE RO,�PVC 24-SGUARE
PAMERIENT
CLASS"C'CONCRE
PIPE
PAVEMENT IKKI,BARE M COMPACTED FILL
WZRHCA_
ED UNIFF NMUVPG`N`
CURI WALK FEEDCONNECTOR
COT
PEG, /a'
WIMUNDEATH
00 01,14.
10 WASHEOCRUSMEC, I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
6'LOAM 3 E NICE ANDINEUDn' WITH THE RULES AND REGULADONS
CONDUITS
&SEED 10 12' GRAIN %DEffik- G�N OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
T. S BE PREPARINC THIS PLAN.
1"TOP mix
TYPE 1-11 3' DIAM P� I R
BITUMINOUS GRA�SEWER 1/2' BINGE E -------------------
8' DIAM. RA�L . . . WILLIAMS SPARAGES LIC
CONCRETE C LD.L WATER PPEPER SURROU
1 1/2-TCPDMRlX AND I
-al D�.
2 1/2 ,2'G INA04 I ELL F
12' CRAAELM v AGI BOTTOM TO
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION (THIS 'S L
(Nm m SEAL,
A--i 1 1. -B CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY PLAN VIEW
----------------
NOTE: THE CULTEC MODEL SHOWN HERE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE
EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
PA.
FEEDCOMII 40LMONLACAREN
CCAPACTED FILL [.GOAlAACNEDF TOPANDSOES
FILTIORFABIVC
IWAHM
mmx. STORE
VUEFIRIA-1.
CRURN
GRACE BE
NIMBI.
EMAXIT GO III i
ACE�)
NECHAKO
------------
A
MR. .. .. .. .. ..
CIWOB IN.GAMB pw-11
MOBIL
MR. rpRSs_I 30,7"PAN
W KN �l ERGBGGN MMO,
PA, BGH ENKRINE FORRELF
a NAx, cul��CNO.20L WE IS
.. n. . BUT. �c W.20L F TO EIDT DIDI
OPIUM. NIGHER) UFNERTOSPANTHE IN 1,02M, fl"P
OfInHE __ BEUCAVNE
41 FC4N ASNEEDED
2. 36'X 24' 4-V Sim PORTALS
CPGN.G
No
CULTEC INTERNAL MANIFOLD DETAIL
ABA,B,HAABER.NP.WABPPAAHUPEWMW
WANA.�.WTGTNEAAAT.TKE
1� 5.BX,PRB..ATER
2,MIWMD�M-20 AWUMU IN P-10 AlH W K,
.AANUI
AWBUE AHO.,KA,AANT GAH,C CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SEDIMENT AND OIL SEPARATOR FINISHED GRACE TOP OF -.51 CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON'HE PUN
DETAIL UNPAVED PAVED SLOPE -2:1 SLOPE DATL
(HOT TO SCALE) EXISTING GROUN CITY OF SALEM
UORK OF THE CITY OF SAL_EM. DID
SURFACE FLAT STONES PU,NNING BOARD C OF APPRONAL
FOR WALL LIKE �EREBY CER"THAT THE NOTICE OF THIS PLAN BY
THE PLANNING BOARD .5 BEEN RECENSO AND REOORDED AT THIS
CONFIGURATION
---------------- OFnCE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DUMNG THE TRENMY
P LINE AS FIELD -�E MATERIAL
AND SUB OA�NOIT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAD NOTICE
DRRMID BY OWNER TO
IMPPONE APPENRV4CE
COMMON FILL NATu
(RETAUN NORMAL TREE
SHAPE) COMMON FILL MATERIAL 1.5 C15--CLERK
MM. SLOPE
TRUNK FLARE
JUNCTICT: PLANT TREE I WARMING TAPE FILTER
-2 OMF EXInNG FABRIC IV'
WE 3
JOlwS 2-
3"LAYER SHREDDED PINE PERPENDICULAR 11/1012015
1
WK MULCH TO To TO SLOPE
OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER ;-I." NO. REMMKIN MATE
KEEP ULC -7�
s H 2*FROM 77'���p
TRUNK -1�,.- _., MIN. SCULDER DETAIL SHEET
EXISTING GRADE 12"MINIMUM SEE 'ORIGINAL SIZE - 50OLO ------------ 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
CUT AND REIAO�SURU� S" AN CLEARANCE NOTE I BELOW ROUND OR
IN SCREENED GRAIVEL CO.PACTED
FRO. TOP 113 OF SCREENED GRAWL PLACED AGAINST FILL PROPOSED --- SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
ROOT BALL. IF
NONBIODEGRADADLE, UNDISTURBED SIDES AND GOTTEN OF H
GRADE OWNER ET AL
REMOVE COMPIUEFELY. TRENCH. SEE NOTE I BARBARA BMW&
18 WALLACE
SLOPE SIDES OF TOILE SONEER OR DFAUN 8 MIN SCREENED GRAAEL BEDDING
LYNN, MA 01901
BACKFILL AS PER BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE. U,
SPECIFICATION MURAL. GATE: CEWS 36055.36056.36051 WILLUMS
NSD REALTY TRUST SPARAGES
APPUCANI,
DO NOT DCAWE BELOW UNDISTURBED EARTH 7 &
THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL ROCTftA_L N07S 6 OAJK�LLE STREET C
L"N. MA 01905
1. FOR PIPES OTHER THAN PVC. SELECTED COMMON FILL MAY BE USED FROM 4'PERFORATUD UNDERDRAIN 75X OF BASE ID PROIECI LOCLIS* T
RADET.,
MID-DAAETER OF PIPE TO 12-ABM TOP OF PIPE TO DISCHARGE TO -DAYLG,ft'AT ROCKS TO BE CLARK AVENUE SALE.. AA s mBXGUF`0N.MA01%q
DECIDUOUS TREE INTERVALS NO GREATER THAN 30 1000 LOS OR
PLANTING TRENCH DETAIL FOR (SEE PUN FOR LOCATIONS) GREATER "A`07`433�sm.
GRAVITY PIPE DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 4
DETAIL
Sc�NOT TO 9
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) RIP-RAP DETAIL I SHEET 9
(NOT TO SCALE) AHI.H�1. 1OH II
A MKOURE .. ...........
.AWA AMO If
OF WRARS \\/4
GEORGE M. &
JEANETTE H.TORIO SUL L� IALKO
ZrWR �KLAN JOSEPH & J WINE TRUST
El LUI LRAUL. GL C N 07-0003 LORRAINE M. lul I Es.HYSENESH, MONROE. JR.
-COURSE &S(FN E 07-0076 -OW2
-JD7-6O "7- -�-r Y ABDEUGADIR
010577 -1. - 07 07-MBS
- 7 1 MY
w-000,
RICHARD L 01 WFIRES EDNE
=2 'CERTIFY TMT I HI CONFORMED
TH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
03-0137 -zo 0 OF DEEM IN
F REGISDERS
.2, N: -THE ING THIS PI_AH.
." v- �PAR
RI OPEN SPACE I
A,= -------------------
NAI WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
WOOK. Z.-vkKAWNY FARMAN,
WOPORD,NAT OF OWSON'GONYWAL
11 MR.OF, U=OF
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
\/�F REY M. &
AGNSK
-Y, FARKIN,AREA DATE�
Ae, em iv
OW. C SALEM
ONSERVATION
COM ISSI N
G._UU.I
1?z 25
PLANNNG&
DrpT Or
\'\ \ E\1ELOPmEN
LEGEND OF MBOLS AND BBREM.....
MONITORING WELL t"O_L06A 0- DENOTES A GRANITE 90NE BOUND
DRILL HOLE TO BE SET
FRE HYDRANT 'MI. ZONE �E WITH A
WATER DATE
�Xi BASIN(GRAND 7 Im.
UTILITY,MILE 'D,
UGHT POLE
CRAY MAN-OLE @
/<>
TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN
SEWER WAI "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
CONIC-CONCRETE
SALEM,MA5SACHUSErrS
SEEN -VORE MOND DRIU.HOLE ONOOK ONAS W*0".
C FIND.FOUND SURYA& DRITS0ou ET AL
WICK.WHEEL CHAIR RAMP SABOULE WIRYO 1A 18 MAL�E READ
"-m 15 _4W LYNIN W 01901
N/F. NEW OR FORMERLY
LC CENTS 35055.36056.36051
_�Z_ __WgCCa WILLMS
ROD. IRGIN ROD RESIDENT. RESIDENTA_ �w SPARAGES
ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY ��TRUST
FRIF CLERKS CERTtFII ON THE PLAN ZONE: BRI) (1) (RI) CLUSTER 76 OAKALLE STREET
L�N. IAA 01905 W'"ORTHWARI
6 EXISTING CONTOUR DATE. OCUS.
B MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: Too IFT ISO IFT NONE ROIECI I
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM Do 150 FT MNE� CLARK A.NUE SALEM. MA KWEDRONL.CH�l
PKI'DOO CONTWR BY MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: Do FT. ASSESSORS EXI'gkEtPE, s 'HOWILOGNIO..
HEREBY CENTI THAT THE NOTICE 01 ApPROVAL OF THIS P r1H IINTMUNI LOT AREA 15.000 SF QCOC S.F. (NONE) HOLOCIS3II-11200
OR 'GN
EWE OF FAMENCHT THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECLINED AND RECORDED A is PAT &9
CMRAGE BY BUILDING 30% 45% 30% 1ARI 7. 8
OFFICE AND THAT No ,pEA_WAS RECEWD DURING THE TWUNTY MUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 IFT 35 FT 0' ZV 40' go, TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET I OF 2
DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEFT.0 RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. WMJqu. FRONT YARD' 15 IFT 30 FT �5 IFT
H FT
MIN 30 FT DO IFT so SHEET 6 OF 11
0
PROPOSED SLY FENCE M MD. SIDE YARD 10 FT SCAI I .4W
MINIMUM REAR YARD� ___7JGU5T 14.2015
---—----UT I
RINI SPOT EUEWkT*N
SURFACE ROW DIRECTION
A STANDARD H�CRANT TO MEET Cn OF
N07F SALEM REOUIREMI
F* CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK TO BE USED ONLY ERE IT
BRICK SHELF WAU-OF MANHC11 WILL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED EARTH. PUMPER CONNECTION ERENKAWAY FLANGE
SLOPE I/FT VERPCM-GRANITE FINISH GRACE, USE RESTRAINED JOINT FITTINGS QVEGA�UG OR FACES ROAD
CURB. TYPE W) MATERIAL VARIES �PROAED EQM)"ERE CONCRETE THRUST ULMK
BINDER COURSE UNACCEPTABLE.
R-ow TOP CDJRSE SIZE OF BLOCK OR MEGA-UG TO BE DESIGNED FOR 1.5 SIDEWALK
T- TIMES NORMAL OPERATING PRESSURE.
VARIES 6. FINISHED STREET GRADE-\ EDGESTONE
BASE COURSE IN. MIN. 'WAW" ,-5 1
PIPE PIPE CRUSI STONE POURED CEMENT SALEM STANDARD
CONCRETE SADDLE KALW BOX.0 COVER
ACCEPTABLE UNDER
SECTION M4 OF THE ACCESS TUBE
BRICKS ON CRAWL AKDOr STANDARD
EWE C2X8 EXPOSED) SPEOFICTIONS 4 MIL POLY V&R STONE �CERTIFY T
TH THE RHAT I HAVE CONFORMED
BRICK CHANNEL APPUES MASONRY RING ULM AND REGULATIONS
TO DROP CONNECTIONS AS VERTICAL GRANITE CURB DE7AIL CONCRETE S'CLDI OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN
wEU-As CONVENTIONAL- (NOT TO SOME) THRUST 8 OCK WATE� WIN PREPARING THIS PLAIN.
A 6-
S�DATE V�VE W -------------------
PLAN IF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC
-------- USED, DO NOT BLOCK BRAIN
SHELF ELEVATION SAME AS PRWDE M CUBIC YARD OF
SLOPE I-/FT....... CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE. ANCHORING TE SELECTED 2'STONE -TO 6'
MI JONTS PROODE 12'SQUARE 6-INCH THICK ABO� WDRA,[T BRAIN
WALL OF MANHOLE CONCRETE BASE UNDER VD RANT
TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT C� OF SALEM
BRICK OR CONCRETE FRI PLANNING BOARD
CONNECTION FOR HIGH
B" MINIMUM OR LOW SERVICE LINE
DETAIL
12"MH IMUM SCREENED (HOT 70 SCALr)
GRAWL BASE.
--------------------
BRICK ON EDGE
VNINETTURITED EARTH
SECTION A-A BITUMINOUS CONC TOP APPLY TACK CQAI
6'HIGH CHECK DAM AHERE SHOM ON PLAN CO.
E7EGAS SF.E,.CIF.ED SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT,
, HC .
CONCRETE COLLAR COURSE AS SPECIFIED
COWR AS SPECIFIED ar N 1-2 CRUST E
FXIS.ED MADE
E SONG GROU D SURFACE OR EZING BASE
MANHOLE FRAME AND 12" STONE E ISTING PAVEMENT
BRICK FOR GRACE
PRECASI�TRANWON SECTION VMIES (SEE PI_AN) IN.
OR BARREL SECTION WITH
PRECAST TOP SLAB
DAT Ei
GRASSED SWALE PAVEMENT MATCH
RUBBER '01 GASKET (NOT TO S�)
OR PREFORMED FLEXISUE DETAIL
4'-0'UNLESS OTHERWISE- =0 JOINT SEALANT As SPECIFIED (NOT TO SCALE)
INDICATED ON DRARTNGS
MAAHO-E RUNGS MU.LIPPLES OF 1'.2-.3-,4-.5-. CI-ERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PIUAN
S' MINIM OR 6' UENGTHS AS REQUIRED FILTER FABRIC AS SPEDIFIED DAM:
SHELF ELEVATION SAME AS SEE PIPE CONNECTION CUERK OF THE CITY OF SALI DO
CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE. DETAILS THIS SHEET HERESH CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPRWA�OF THIS PLAN BY
THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECE�D AND RECORDED AT THIS
8- MINIMUM OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECE�D DURING THE TWENTY
DAYS NE<T AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE.
12-MINIMUM
THICKNESS OF W70M SLAB SCREENED GFA�L
SHAU-NDT BE LESS THAN
THE MANHOLE BARREL
SECTION WALL OR TOP SLAB BRICK OR CONCRETE nU.. r�-MCOD POST -3—-owl—�.
WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 1210712015
1111RI:m lOrLDR BOUND 2 ftcwuim.� lllluigut�
SECTION B-B AMBLE Ilm II3:Ivat 7011MIRD, BVILES PUMCEE,m THE CONITCUIR 1 DruIlls 2141WIS
UNDISTURBED CURTH PREI'llooliLy m WE -im MORKoH, I DAM
PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE 2-REMR% �PICKIES. FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED DETAIL SHEET
DETAIL raw
(NOT TO SCALE) 'THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
T:PoBACKnLl
TL
01
EXISTING Mau DETT F FL BARBARA DRISCOU 9 A�
SURF,
18�ALLACE ROAD
MA 01901 WnIJAMS
L LC NCEPTS 36055.36056.36057
L
W,Ca
CARRI FABRIC DOAN� APPUCANT,
INTO TRENCH NED FEALTY TRUST SPARAGES
VA- 1-2'CRUSHED 76 OMMULE MEET
STONE
FLO'K MIN. r"�WOOD POSTS LYNN. MA 01905
PRWECT I OCUS
8--o-O'C' MAK. I-ARK A�NUE SALEM. MA
s
ASSESSORS RFFFRENCE� HKOHL M.III.."
MAP 6 PAREM 7r 8 & 9 NMLONN053�00
STONE CHECK DAM TEMPORARY HAYBALE SILTFIENCE �-NOTTTCI� DETAIL SHEET I OF 4
(HOT 70 SCALE) DETAIL DETAIL SHEET 8 OF I I
(HOT TO SCA�E) (HOT TO SCALE) AUGUSIT 14.2015
E.,ONG GROUND SURFACE 11M.o.MADE FRAME&MATE FINISHED MADE TRAME A GRATE
FINISHED GRACE r D=GRACE
MANHOLE FRAME AND MORTAR BRICKS AND MORI.
�R AS SPECjnED I TO BE USED TO MAtT eboCKS Ah. BRTAR
N. (TYPT_ . ....... MADE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE USED TO MAKE
RUN.ST FLAT TOP SUPPLER TO PROVIDE GRACE ALATSiTbENTS
CONCRETE COLLAR ASEENDUE TO BE 12-INCI C�AS To
NPI IN SEII, SUPPORT AN H-20 LOAD
BRICK FOR OWE MON
COMMON FRU AAWfiIA_ 6'OVERIAP ADUIUSTMENT' V, L—PRECAST TFUMNSITION CONICAL SECTION,--, WEEPPME TO BE
SECT OR BARREL no MEWT IN RMIR
X SEM WTHI PRECAST FIBER�TIOR� ME'DW
ON
FILL
MCK AN
0 BE U
OR IS
T
on ON AD ALULS
A=To a
CAST IN RI
SECTOR
n.N WEEWNBLE To
ME� ,IN RI
�l DIAMETER SED ON
ON
ON
BULL
JE TOP STAR
R RUBBER TO-RING
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC GASKET OR PRE-
SRAMA,
To 3/4
ASNED `__L
OR HOPE
G P)
,7 2. ED FLEXIBLE r MAM
JORN'T SEALANT LEVEL .2MANANCE FIBER
To M
318-TO 3/4-
WASHED CRUANEL
MANHOLE RUNGS I CATCH BASIN TRAP NORMALL WORSE OF PIPE
A VLPFLM OF Am .2-CLEARANCE
1,1�1.4.5 OR 6 FT A.SECTCN__� LORD.
THS AS RED D
4' PERF. CORR. HOPE 1�
(HOLES FACING UP) 4-0' UNLESS OTHERWISE CAWN BASIN IRAP
INDICATE SAM SECHON
��UNDISTUIMED EARTH
12'MIMWUM
FOUNDATION SCREEMED GRAVEL JMNTURRIED EARTH
UNDERDRAIN
DETAIL 12-MINIMUM SCRENED GRAVEL PRECAST DOUBLE-GRATE CATCH BASIN l.'WNPu.
(NOT TO MAILE) DETAIL SCREENED DRAWL UNDISTLISSED WITH
THICKNESS OF BOTTOM SIAS MINIMUM CONCRETE FILL (NOT TO SmE)
MAIL.NOT BE LESS THAN 3' DOUBLE OFATE PRECAST CATCH BASIN
THE MAINHOLE BARREL
SECTION WALL OR TOP SLAB
WHICHEtER IS GREATER UNDISTURBED EARTH DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
FRAME SINGLE DRAW
PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE UFTMG MRARS
DETAIL
(NOT TO SCAtfl)
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
WALLED BETWEEN
Z�
THE GRATE AND TRAME
I CEMIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
G,THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS TN
REPARTNG THIS PILUN.
EL611
-------------------
VALLANS & SPARAGES LILC
SE
CLERKS CERTRTCAFON ON THE PLAN
DATE: GUM LIFFM ST.
It C"C"
UP
CLERK OF THE CITY OF WON. 00 ER WAS
HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF NIS PLAN BY
V_.' 2 0' T-0- THE PLA,NNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECERAED AND RECORDED AT THS E
OfTTCE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEhRED DURING THE TWENTY 4 T
DAYS NUT AFTER SUCH RECOPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTCE. ONSER STNAR
AT __Z� L
UITY CLERK
.1 THROAT GRARGE t7t= MOMENT TRUP M
fl I I I I I IL:.I=- I I I CIRRI INUEF SECTION CGUAL
I v/ CLR INUET EECO.14 OPEN THROAT GRANNE Q UATION
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP CATE:
PRECAST DETAIL
CATCH PREC ST (NOT TO SCALC)
BASIN CATCH 41
S I N EA,SIN 1)To be plobehl in the e,mV,g CcACH boonh;ocKbid I,ClOrke AvenAe piol to the Rod of colot'Aelio..
EF7A MEN THROAT MANTE SERION 2)To be eWed in the p.,ts.d eaten besine be Ho—innnnedieltIN,oft.,instol.i..to P. bectimc,
A
ELM CURB INUET SECTOR Nonn—I the Vorrinealb, I,,trinen, 3 12/01,2015
3 GLANGC CATCH FWARE EL61 IF No 1=MUM— 11110/2015
AND CASCADE DRAW GE. ReSsm DABBE
1.200 OR APPO.. OPEN DIRDAT WAVE
O"LOW POINTS,M.LFEAR-S) CUM SHUT SECTOR
DETAIL SHEET
CAM BASN FRAME AND MAW�ALL BE III
A4. LY-244B-2 FRAME KIN V12W CRATES ON EU.S "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVSION
So Ot AND MORTAR AND UF2AB2 GRAWS 0 LOW IH ARM
7 TO'BE USEI TO NAME FOUNDI VIC OF MOCKTON.POINTS
A OR EOJI
ADULSTRENTS5 4 CSET AT BRIDER CINARSE AND REM'A' SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
FRAME& E BRICKS AND MBWWb 1- M.FINISH PAKEMENT)
To BE USED TO MAKE OVRNM
GRAIDE ADULSONONS I M AND MORNAR BAREAKRA DRISCOLL 0 AL
F n t Too.1.TO MAKC 18 WALLACE READ
E ART�I'0. R ART t"GRAMEREN All'.1�MMETER MADE AMNSTMENTS LYNN. Not 01901
FRANC. - V I - LC GEM 36055.35056.36057
BE T
B C,R AND..A WILLLAMS
PRECAST PREC PRECAST 1.BE USED 1.MAKE PRECAST APPLICANT. -W-.g SPARAGES
T MEN TC BZ
CATCH BASIN
AST m N 0 RUMLI TRUST &
8 CATCH BASIN CATCH BALSAM PCATCH �IN G USTNENGS
726 CAWULE STREET
4V*I-DIAMETER LGHN, AS,01905
PROJFCT LOCUI WASH
,MBRE101
SECTIO FILINATION SECTION
CLARINt AWNUE WE
...WHO S'..
M s
EliENCE,
A-A A-A
9 offlPH * 9
GRANITE CURB INLET DOUBLE-GRATE CB GRANITE CURB INLET DEML SHEET 3 OF 4
DETAIL DETAIL SCAJ_E:NOT TID SCAl_E
(NOT TO SWE) (HOT TO SI SHEET 10 OF I I
&NGUE DRAW DOUBLE GRATE MCUST 14,2015
...........
FIE &OOLRN r`S�L,
INS."GRAO,
F
"TTFR OF,
t-z 31
7 �N;-
TO BE LSEC TO VANE
.�;j---I TO IRS�AL�- UA�IE�D.S-TILITS PIJEET�TO PRO'DE -11
2
F�A�IN,
I-ICH _O-.jFS 70 �s TICIP-
i i �y TXK C=T 'I,-, N t
HERB SUPPORT. LI p, ----
0 A�OHOI-IG SUF"c11 11.-20 LOA` PAVEMENT. ,m
W.CC014C. MDM--- i"-oA4 -- ,I I� I
PAVEMENT AAR..'-
O'j-,TE Of RIF,
-2 I�NARI
�1" GRAVEL EASE��Flw- =TK EASE
(wTcH1�G)
11-.C�BAER 1AI` nt,
IF
F11ll,1. YSII
CUARN. IT,I Fzl�l
N NOEMPT.TANVEL
I -NOREll�.,1AL..111. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" 200'
SCREENE'S�IA.EL L E-l" GFATE1 1�1111REO OUTS.0.1.OF ePOL'I"CE SALEM ISM
S�8GO`d)r Ts REOWN INENt, SSE NOTE i
F.IIIULNEU Tv�- 0,,— S.T�z A`T,-,1
B I- TANE"T
BIT,
PRECAST SHALLOW DRAIN MANHOLE PRECAST SHALLOW CATCH BASIN PAVEMENT MATCH R."w C TA,�11 RE E LEXI IOBI IBEU BEL.TINO�
DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL NO1, , W71
51-1�1) :NU� TO S�Lr'l -,I S�L�� 1. -A 1�.OTHER 7�AN 1.SEUEOT�O...FLL UA�.-S-1l"I.,
11T-O,,N1 OF FEE I I.AEOLE wl,a"F,,
TRENCH DETAIL FOR
GRAVITY PIPE
HOTS,p�
3 HOA,R,�
'OTE,
A,:
IR
4tv --------- ---
OFE
OFF
.,F.111E A .7T.
TO -CLARK STREET
IFA' --- ------------
-F-
H 7
8
It........
BR RE,
KV, m
SIR I 1�1 OLT.1 11,2�
I`F 10, L 11.
OR I1.1 OS, REPRR BITUMINOUS SIDEDNALX VRE
& D�Ay APft(ONS AS
(14 FIV`E.111. .12 0.
EVLAS,a.OF A,EEP`I NEC�
AFFFO�
CL
Ar --------
HoUST
UA�ROTA LIT-1-iO,.S
Cr1.nE- IN NT
A
v kA
j-
LF AnONS PLAN NOTE,
_�EGEND�OF SYMBOLS AND ABBIREN
'3R T
ECIECAL WU.IS AS BIC.ON A F�l EHFTLET ..�C"PROINE;1 5�IAN�ITTIA'E- I
FO1;TcRp1G AT- t, REGE:AVEDPROPOSED DRAINAGE
%FASS, DA70 AN U, S, 2OOE REI SIR)TmNO-S' FIESITiAll -3, 2RO5-Y EA�, RN t AN',
SR�,
NATE-WE 2.��RTkrFtC FEA-URES ARE E RESULT OF AIN ACr-I -EFO SUN11-INDICTED 13�A-L.1 I IMPROVEMENT PLAN
BEIRA -1EU F�1NIOROATI, BTFONN.41-HE ETHO'ER1 m I
OTI ITCENSER!-� 20; ELPILE. ......
D-c 1 �2015
OES L
110 SUAFEI Ell FFFIFEXTRE�ASOlE. IT IN
TATIEN BASI ITHAN) 9
I 7TTwA-ATE 10 ETLANO REIC0CE AA�l .�T-11 SO'11 T.r PINIRR�ZRAINACE
-TT. BE.-
-74-1y DEPT.OF PLANNING&
S T.R PLAN,ER ASS C S,.0�TO I PEI OF OTR KIO�1� BE
SALEM, MA
A,'HE 1.1- BE k.PQNB-1 .I T--r LOSATOI.E�'AND 'j
L�'-T FOLE TO E EFAOON OF ALL EXiSTrNG ITTER-1, 1,OF1-N 107 PAORT,11�ISI P.S.1.30m TC Al x �,�......
TI EIG,�ZER SHA,,BE NONO COMMUNITY Dp\fFLOPMENT V 10' 2V 40'
E' I�11 1111frES FOLNI IFFIN'
DRA,I.1POLE �I TIE-NOPSZD nONSYRICEON AND AFFRI-R417i..'I'ATTE.9- No-R-CrE-IG'."I THE �u:1- 20- DATE DECEMBER 16,2015
WORK T�r CONTRAC70N 15 REBrONSBUE FOR OKANNO�CIlIFE IIJUBER 'i-SCO-DO-SAE)PRIOR T/CLARK AVENUE INTERSECTION
BEAER LHI�OL- CSP THE IFII OF c(R."RICNON
CLARK STREE
nUE jp,,, 5 -REN,,ES CT NND EXSR-;v PAVEYETE ARE TO BE TEAT FETCHED, 11 sl�
rLS -,HE JEUTIES SHOWN ATTL BASSID UPON FFL��UW-AFT PFOORD F-ANS AAUAB�7 THIRTAUGH TWE
OTET OF SA�Fy M.7NE EBSU RECBTRY Or W��.PFR%U,STP-7.VIE NOT NazjTTVE- OF�L
-XSTsFN CONTC N1 Nb-;-
-R FNSNNS UNUERG40UNO UT�'T EN PRESEN'.AND,AT- MIFFAITED TO Ar TRREC'
0F.EOSIE CoNrn'-O ------T'a---- I -L PROPOSED DIII INE SIAL BE -1�-IEI!il PCTLIET�YLENE FIFE NDEE)
E03Z Or P�40VENT ------Or------- IF,Lm"N.."Em WILLIAMS
OCR 3 �I H-H S-�It�IF ALL HI.I.D:.III-IES.1 BE I ON SPARAGES
rNr-',O�SEF� 9,ABLO-NO ITRO"NT�LINES Hl�j BEEN OPSLED IVOM VAR�O-S FECON��ITANS AS WE-AS T�z H.N. NA—
BEFT FA-E�AESEST*N,'S INFOI WD SHOULD BE 1111TOI A0PRET..,
NTIF y
31,11\01S.11, Sun 101
10 LOCATIOI OF L�ARKE AVENUE�AND C-AR4 S'PLET AFE IS 51.1 A fw� PHONE,(978)539-5088
ON LAN,
PROPOBv-- �BFLTl
S FAX:(ENS)S39-U2.-
c -ITOSE�1FD-11-ION Eiio
IS
PAl M. M...I. G`C
Al ff.�I.ilil IN PA.Il Ai PAFNA A.."IL. P,Al All Nil .1. kill
NP I.
Pi RP Tolip,s III IOGG 11,I1 Ii
Al RI, YOF FPfAI
PMUFS AN Al MINUVINDO, RI NPARS M�AN
-20 —Pl —fil L.
A' OF, lil .1 TOP V`IiIFF1 111 .1 11 P,Ill if
UI i;m
W IAMN T 21 AFF III Il
Al n 1. ONIN AF`l
..-Il "AI
IV ANAC IV I ..'Al
NUI PAS I PLE,A, APIC P-illf.
l . — 111-12R.
'IlLi,
All MOLP,III. 'i R
Ol "Al"N"AFE INFIL'ifil Pi PLP A. Yl PAA .1YNl I Fill Al —pl i NAFl ,NP —I.. IP Vil
Il..NNI. —i..PAR.
IN
'il Jill Ir
Pul
IN
—Pj.P`NAL
011
OEi,IiNN. *2'�Nni .2- "Mil 12"MNI-
-jt .__ ..F
P011 Pill UARI PRE. All __IINMOIRRED Ul
POVIANN)El =Mp
SECTION SFGFON SECTON SECTION
(2) DO III NA— Ol III..
pil Dl,lIIFl
Pi
NET
IORAIN IV NI Fill JURAIN
"w Ail Al
8-1 8
F.T.1.Il
PLAN PLAN
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
INFILTRATION BASIN 1 INFILTRATION BASIN 2 INFILTRATION BASIN 3 INFILTRATION BASIN 4
(NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT 7D SCALE) (NOT TO S�UE)
CITY OF !IALEM
DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL Mi CANOE PLANNING BOARD
DETAIL
R/
(NOT TO SCALE) DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL ED
A��'�/ REMI 6 EXISTING SOIL
OF
W/3- El
POST TOP LAMP TRAIL DETAIL CRUSHED STONE
BIT SIDDIALIN USABLE SIDEWMILK MOM PER AM IS NOT TO BE DETAIL
LESS MAN 4'-0* LZ (NOT TO SCALF) (NOT To SCALE)
ED. SEED MOM
DETECTABLE WARNING PANELS ME REWIRED 3
Nl R! ACCORDANCE 1 C25'DII
0 N OPOSED WVOLCHAIR RAMPS
ALL PR TO BE
III CONSTFUCTON
3/8-D. ME 1/2- STANDARD MIT 107.6.M (DECEMBER 2004) TYPICAL INSTALLATION
DEEP AT
POINT Of SURVEY
PANELS MAY BE CONCRETE PRECAST OR
REFERENCE CAST IN PLACE OR OMER SUITABLE
MAYOR AL PERM INENT-Y APPLIED TO ME
RAMP.'DEMCTA40UE WARNING SURFACES ---------------
48- SHALE CONTRAST ASUALLY WM ADJACENT
I WALKING SURFACES EIMER LICHT-ON-DARK,
OR DARK-Ol A
27.75'
L
rL4
OV-1.4'
SECTION A-A
0
A 0.1 DATE:
LINE
LAYOUT
LINE
3 ANN.... MOIR..
GRANITE BOUND SIOEWAl VNA LE VMF. LE j�5'
.5 7.5 Am 1 1
-7.c WE Al Dill
DETAIL
L G IS 0. DETAIL SHEET
(NOT TO SCALE) LANDIN
"THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVSION
MASS PLOT 1.5Z' CAMS SLOPE CAN POST TOP-TYPE UNIF AS
TOWARD STREET FOR I I 11� AC
DRAINAGE MANUFACTURED BY COOPER UGHTING. INC. OR
NEU PROPOSED..P 22 EOUAt- SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
RACE AT ENDSOF CURB
GRASS PLOT Ol
PROGNMASO LAMP TYPE - HIGH PRESSURE BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL
SODIUM (HPS) 18 WALLACE ROAD
LYNN. MA 01901
V/\,qlp-.-ITC CURB L 6IEDW OF RUAGAMY PROPOSED LAWIP WATIME - 150 LC CERTS 36055'36056,36051 Wl
RE'l 1 20* -
6'REIl AT END-/ O*TRBUFON - TYPE ill INTERNAL REFRACTOR APPLICANT
I REALLY TRUST & SPjkl
76 OANMUE STREET
REFERENCE 'LUCIIEL COMPOSITE LIGHT POLE 01905
PLAIN CEMENT CONCRETE IN
24 LANDINI ii LYNN. MA
MINO DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL PROJECT LOCUS., T
1.5% - SLOPE FOR DRUANAGE DETAIL CLARK AVENUE Sil MA WMAGENON.Mil
I CORTIFY MAT I HNIE CONFORMED (NOT TO SCALE) ASSESSORS RFFERENCE' .DOW 13�..
H WHEELCHAIR RAMP (WCR) . 1450.1.
ITT ME RULES AND REGULATIONS MAR G PARELS 7, 8 & 9
OF ME REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN PROPOSED LIGNT Pl SHALL BE A DURABLE FEERGLAllS REINFORCED COMP09TE FLUTED-TYPE,AS MANUFACTURED
PREPARING THIS PLAN DETAIL BY SINAXESPEARE, 1ifASHINGTON STYLE'WIM A 20'ANCHOR BASE DETAIL SHEET 4 OF 4
(NOT TO SCALE) NOTES ll THIS MODEL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WOM A CAFY a SAUDIM ARRAIGNED DOUNALIENT SCALL NOT TO
CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE iO,S%
N�LAM� SPWATGE��LECT AUGUST 14.2015 SHEET I I OF I I
R-p
SERAFINI , DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212
J05EPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
SeptembeRE-20EIVE13-741-4683
SEP 15 2015
VIA HAND DELIVERY DEPT. OF i,�i,4NiNG&
00MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Erin Schaeffer, Staff Planner
City of Salem
Department of Planning and Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Erin:
Enclosed please find the following in connection with the above project:
1. Check in the amount of $5,000.00, payable to the City of Salem,
representing the traffic peer review fee; and
2. Check in the amount of $5,500.00, payable to the City of.Salem,
representing the civil engineering peer review fee.
If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me.
V ry truly you
.ry
os�W.
ph C C rrenti
Enclosures
cc: client
9-0-m-
Ln mjgw�-Ilffa,�
Ln 111111111IMMIM2 M
m C,�,I
m I A L
�9 -XPT- OF
m A 644 POSeM90 $ L= IN
M pL,4,11 I
't C=
U,40 K.Iuorl.d Fee
ru I P(Mark
M Retu.Flocelp 03
C3 (End n,F,.q Zoo
onseme red) 'Par
C3 0)
Restricted Delivery Fee co
C3 (EndomemerA Required)� LLI
-21
_a ToW Powage&Fees $
nj
C3 (rj
f k-----------------
Certifled Mail Provides:
01 A mailing receipt
in A unique Identifier for your mallplece
N A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
4 � i
Important Reminders: ; . I
• Certified mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Malla or Priority Mail,
• Certified Mail is notavallable for any class of Intemational.mail.
in NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mall. For
valuables,please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
• For an additional fee,a Return Racelpt may be requested toTrovide proof of
delivery.To obtain Return Receipt service,plena complete an attach a Return
Receipt(PS Form 3811)to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee.Endorse mallplece'Return Receipt Requested'.To receive a fee waiver for
a duflicate return receipt,a USPSO postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
requ red.
• For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addresses or
addressee's authorized agent.Advise the clerk or mark the mallplece with the
endorsement"Restricted-Delivaiy".
in If a postmark on the Certified Mall recel Is desiredlease present the arti-
cleat the post offics for postmarldng.Pill a postma on the Certified Mail
receipt Is not needed,detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT.,Save this raCeIpt and present It when making an Inquiry.
PS Form 380D,August 2008(Re�)PSN 7530-02-000-9047
RECEIVED
SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP Or C 0 12015
E
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
�3 FEDERAL STREET DEPT. OF PLANNING&
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 COMMUNJ7�� `11CLOPMENT
JOHN R. SERArINI. SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
978-741-4683
December 1, 2015
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Ben Anderson, Chairman
City of Salem Planning Board
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSD Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan;
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit;
and Application for Stormwater Management
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Chair Anderson:
On behalf of the Applicant, NSD Realty Trust, I hereby request allowance
to continue the hearing date for the above Applications until the Board's next
regularly scheduled meeting on December 17, 2015.
NSD Realty Trust
?its Attorn , I
Joseph C. Cor-r'enti
JCC:dl
cc: NSD Realty Trust
FCity of Salem Department of Planning & Community Development
-��theck/Cash Receipt and Tracking Form
Please Complete form and ake two copies.
Date Received
Amount Received
Form of Payment heck Money Order
Client Information
CASH PAYMENTS: client initials
Sign Permit Application Fee
Conservation Commission Fee
Payment received For what
service? Vslanning Board Fee/ ZBA
El SRA/DRB Fee
Ej Old Town Hall Rental Fee
Other:
Name of staff person receiving
payment
Additional Notes
k-
-MY!
M ,, - �- I
2", 151
NO 15-5-5
0XIM-1
[PAY T
0 THE
ORDER OF City of Salem.
$ **5,500.00
Five Thousand Five Hundred and 00/1 00—*—********-*�....
UULLARS
NERAREAA,!ft1,;
-Salem,W, !ESIGTAW�,
-,,'W4
0*171
AI
JIM
go
CRY Of Salem Department of Plannin Community Development
Check/Cash Receipt angd Tracking Form
Please co ete fo and f!?gke two copies.
Date Received
Amount Received
Form of Payment �)Q heck Money Order
Client Information
CASH PAYMENTS: client initials
El Sign Permit Application Fee
Payment received for what EDConservation Commission Fee
Service? E5��nning Board Fee/ ZBA
EISRA/DRB Fee
E] Old Town Hall Rental Fee
Other:
Name of staff person receivin
payme t
Additional Notes
�'PAY
'4 ORD THE
OF ......... ...
9
17MW 0
Five T
**5,000.00
DO
RS
te
2,-
W
4
f
V 4
Al
6s qx,
O-S
Form C Subdivision
C k Avenue
lar
p 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9)
CjaKk Ave ,
wims
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
City of Salem provision M.G.L.,Chapter 39,Section 23D
For a City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio of a missed
meeting and examining all evidence.
Per of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 23D,
1, YA
MLf &Al '7�(ereby certify under the pains and pena ie
,,,, V,o ger�p th t I have
examined all evidence pertaining to tV%Q, LlAV)fk� ?gw +'Me It' i f gh�j , which
was distributed at the single missed session on which evidence included
an audio recording of the missed session. This certificAtIOD WRS submitted prior to the undersigned's
participation in a vote on the matter and shall become part of the record of the hearing.
Signature C�2 � //I/— — Date
V
Board of Commission
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
City of Salem provision M.G.L.,Chapter 39,Section 23D
For a City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio of a missed
meeting and examining all evidence.
Per the City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 231),
:�(A&5, ' hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have
examined all evidence pertainin2 to 049�\ A,& (AAR SWOA(_\A�11W -, which
was distributed at the single missed session on I)eGeMVJeR H i WIG, which evidence included
an audio recording of the missed session. This certification was submitted prior to the undersigned's
participation in a vote on the matter and shall become part of the record of the hearing.
Signature 5� k�7� Date I
Board of Commission
C�OL�K OL�Q%C - fbKM ()
ANk
AGGREGATE
INDUSTRIES
January 19, 2016
City of Salem Planning Board
c/o Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner R E C E I V LE 77)"
Department of Planning & Community Development
120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor JAN 25 2016
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
DEPT. OF PLANNING &
Ladies and Gentlemen, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
I write to you regarding NSD Realty TRUST's Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential
Development Special Permit and Stormwater Management Permit application for the construction of a
roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots located at Clark Avenue, Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8,
and 9 (the "Subdivision"). Aggregate Industries-Northeast Region, Inc. has long operated a quarry
generally southeast of the proposed Subdivision (the "Quarry").
Should the Planning Board approve the Subdivision and permits, to be fair to potential purchasers of
property in the Subdivision, we ask that the Planning Board's document approving the permits and
Subdivision identify that the Subdivision is within close proximity of the Quarry and that operations at
the Quarry include periodic blasting operations which property owners in the Subdivision should
expect to hear and feel. Further, we ask that appropriate references be made within the real property
filing records to such blasting at the Quarry and that all deeds for conveyance of property in the
Subdivision be required to include the following language or language similar to the following:
This conveyance is made subject to and with the benefit of matters referred to in the
REFERENCE PLANNING BOARD APPROVAL DOCUMENT and recorded with said Deeds at
FILING REFERENCE and REFERENCE COVENANT DATED and recorded with said Deeds at FILING
REFERENCE. Reference is hereby made to these recorded documents for Information regarding
the fact that an active quarry is located nearby that conducts periodic blasting operations and
that the homeowners in COMMON NAME OF SUBDIVISION should expect to hear the blasts
and feel vibrations.
We believe provision of the information described above is fair and equitable to both potential
purchasers of Subdivision property and to Aggregate Industries-Northeast Region, Inc. as a long time
local employer and operator.
We would',be haKpyto answer any questions the Planning Board may have regarding this request.
X
Sinc� ell
William Miller
Regional Counsel, Aggregate Inclustri.es-Northeast Region, Inc.
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES US-NORTHEAST REGION
1715 Broadway, Saugus, MA 01906
(703)608-4925
A member of the LafargeHolcim Group
To:City of Salem Planning Board
Re: Definitive Plan of the Woodlands Subdivision
We,the undersigned, have the following questions,concerns and suggestions in regards to the above proposed
subdivision that we bring to your attention for consideration and inclusion in the public record;
Questions
• The proposed subdivision appears to alter the location of a road previously approved,by the land court. Can this
roadway be altered without the approval of the land court?
• Will all construction be performed outside of the 100 ft wetlands buffer zone?
• What measures will be employed during blasting and construction to prevent debris from entering the
wetlands?
• Will the developer be responsible for repairing damage to Clark Ave,Clark St, and Barnes Rd surfaces that is
done by construction vehicle activity?
• Once approval is given, is there a time limit for completion of the project?
Given the scope of this project,we strongly believe that all engineering should be peer reviewed by an
independent engineering firm. Will this be required?
Concerns
Impacts of Construction
o Blasting, Dust and Noise
Traffic
• Already increased on Barnes Rd/Clark St connector due to building of Dunkin Donuts on corner of Clark
St and Highland Ave. I . . � I
• Doubles the number of cars needing to exit the subdivision via the intersection of Clark Ave and Clark St
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at blind corner just after entering Clark Ave
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at blind corner in vicinity of 20 Clark St
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at double-blind corners on Barnes Rd
City Water and Sewer
• Ensure that water pressure in the neighborhood is not impa�tecl
• Ensure that sewage system has capacity for new development
Storm Water Runoff
• Review existing storm basins that are expected to absorb the extra runoff being directed from the new
development to ensure they have the appropriate capacity.
• Ensure that storm water management does.not negatively impact neighborhood
Emergency Response
0 Ensure that Fire Department will,be able to access all homes and have sufficient hydrant access and
water,pressure
0 Fire alarm box installation
Perimeter Walkway
o We do not want this walkway.
We feel that the b�' efits will'beliarl outweighed by the Undesirable issues it will bring
0 en
Homeless squatters raiding peoples'yards and ho mes
Fires and refuse
Drug abusers and their.paraphernali�
Hell-raisers drinking and leaving behind empty bottles and cans
o We would prefer a more centrally located park/playground area that allows increased visibility for safety
and a sense of community much like the old principle of the"town well".
Industrial Zon�
• Lots 20,21, 22,and 13 all appear to be partially within the industrial zoned land
• Lot 27
The only access to this lot is all the way through the new development which is already'
overburdened with'iricreased traffic.
If this lot is ever developed there will no doubt be a marked increas'e'in traffic from the people
working at this industrial'site—driving past all the'new homes and children that they have no
vested interest in. - I
We would prefer open space to be centrally located and would consider supporting the rezoning
of the industrial portion of the parcel to R-1 to enable relocation of open space to a more
central area.
In the past,developers have taken steps to minimize impact on the neighborhood.during const
ruction and have aided
the City In implementing needed neighborhood improvements. To th.at end,we have identified a' iist of suggestions for
minimizing impact on the neighborhood and neighborhood impro'v'ements perhaps the developer would support;
• Weekly street cleaning during construction, if necessary
• Implement dust control measures
• Strict adherence to City's construction hours of operations
• New catch basins at the intersection of Clark St and Clark Ave
• New catch basin in vicinity of 19-21 Clark St to alleviate large ice collection that occurs every winter.
• Signage warning motorists of blind corners on Clark Ave,Clark St and Barnes Rd
• Traffic calming measures(speed bumps)where proposed Woodlands Road descends to Clark Avenue.
Name Address Signature
U C5C?C76/ '5 7- 4k
1�� LwOo 3Y C[A-M 51-
ZttO�,)JA)t) 3,;', CM 44r- d7-
<41`t.� Tbrziot-.� -3 1,:, <�-LA Pe-k S-11
:24 W VO
r-U
C 6 1- Ave-
&LA&YL. �j k Pro (:9N-5 If
,5,�IAIDIP-e TR4-Al C,Llvk /Ve-
Re-be-cco, G%A-evet i io Aje .
ct q'r P /9 V-r
To: City of Salem Planning Board
Re: Definitive Plan of the Woodlands Subdivision
We,the undersigned, have the following questions,concerns and suggestions in regards to the abo e proposed
subdivision that we bring to your attention for consideration and inclusion in the public record;
Questions
• The proposed subdivision appears to alter the location of a road previously approved by,the land court. Can this
roadway be altered without the approval of the land court?
• Will all construction be performed outside of the 100 ft wetlands buffe.r.zone?
• What measures will be employed during blasting and construction to prevent debris from entering the
wetlands'?
• Will the developer be-responsible for repairing damage to Clar"ve, Clark St,and Barnes Rd surfaces that is
done by construction vehicle activity?
• Once approval is given, is there a time limit for completion of the project?
Given the scope of this project,we strongly believe that all engineering should be peer reviewed by ary'
independent engineering firm. Will this be required?
Concerns
Impacts of Construction
o Blasting, Dust and Noise
Traffic
• Already increased on Barnes Rd/Clark St connector due to building of Dunkin Donuts on corner of Clark
St and Highland Ave. I . � I
• Doubles the number of cars needing to exit the-subdivision via the intersection of Clark Ave and Clark St
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at blind corner just after entering Clark Ave
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at blind corner in vicinity of 20 Clark St
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at double-blind corners on Barnes Rd
�4
City Water and Sewer
• Ensure that wat'er pressure in the neighborhood is not impacted
• Ensure that sewage system has capacity for neWrclev�elopment
Storm Water Runoff,
• Review existing storm basins that are expected to absorb the extra runoff being directed from the new
development'to ensure'th'ey 'have the appropriate caokity�
• Ensure that s1torm.watermarfagement doeg not negatively impact neighborhood
Emergency Response
• Ensure that Fire Department will be able to access all homes and have sufficient hydrant access and
watbr pressure
• Fire alarm box installation
Perimeter Walkway
o We do not want this walkway.
o We feel that the benefits will be far outweighed by the undesirable issues it will bring
Homeless squatters raiding peoples'yards and homes
Fires and refuse
Drug abusers and their paraphernalia
Hell-raisers drinking and leaving behind empty bottles and cans
o We would prefer a more centrally located park/playground area that allows increased visibility for safety
and a sense of community much like the old principle of the "town well".
Industrial Zone"
• Lots 20,21, 22, and 23 all appear to be partially within the industrial zoned land
• Lot 27
The only access to this lot is all the way through the new development which is already
overburdened with increased tr affic'.
If this lot is ever developed tlie�e will no doubt be a marked increase in traffic from the people
working at this ind6"strial s.ite I—driving past 411 the new homes and children that th ey have no
vested interest in.
We would prefer open space to be centrally located and would consider supporting the rezoning
of the industrial portion of the parcel to R-1 to'enable relocation of open space t6a more
central area.
In the past,developers have taken steps.to minimize impact on the neighborhood during construction and have aided
the City in implementing needed neighborhood improvements. To that end,we have ide ntified a list.of suggestions for
minimizing impact on the neighborhood and neighborhood improvements perhaps the developer would support;
• Weekly street cleaning during construction, if necessary
• Implement dust control measures
• Strict adherence to City's construction hours of operations
• New catch basins at the intersection of Clark St and Clark Ave
• New catch basin in vicinity of 19-21 Clark St to alleviate large ice collection that occurs every winter.
• Signage warning motorists of blind corners on Clark Ave,Clark St and Barnes Rd .
0 Traffic calming measures(speed bumps)where proposed Woodlands Road descends to Clark Avenue.
Name Address sionAure
-4�2 d (20A2V
c 4,U J 7 U4�
-3-? 0.6,*4 si-
) e -1-141A MIJAJAg6 , �'6 f- t 4 lZk 'S 7'
Amw_
Amanda Chiancola
From: dpcol2bur@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 11:34 AM
To: Amanda Chiancola
Cc: dpcol2bur@aol,com
Subject: Clark Ave Public Way OCT 7 VA,�40
4A$t�, 5 ,?01
00, - Opp
Hi Amanda ZAA,,,,
Thank you for help yesterday.
Here is a my typed explanation:
October 15 2015
Clark Ave Is a registered land court public way,with lots designed left and right of its 40-foot width.
Simply put no one owns the public way.
Naturally,you cannot have or take land you do not own.
Otherwise if you could, the other"abutters to Clark Ave; the Tran family and the Ted Barcikowski family would be able to
take their share as well."
Based on this idea, their share would encompass the"entire developers access",thus preventing the developer access to
the developed Clark Ave and their share would also be most of developer's lot 12, some of lot 13,14 and 15.
Clark Ave is a 40-foot public way laid out in 1918-plan 7159b sheet 3 and 5. All register lots are calculated off the bounds
of Cark Ave 40 foot public way.
The developer is taking the land it does not own and using it for square footage for its lots and purposes
The developer does not have a right to take this land.
The developer needs to redesign the plan using the Clark Ave public way as laid out in plan 7159 b sheet 3 and 5.
Again, based on the developer's idea, "the Abutters, share would encompass the"entire developers access", thus
preventing the developer access to the developed Clark Ave and their share would also be most of developer's lot 12,
some of lot 13,14 and 15."
Bottom line is"The developer needs to redesign the plan using the Clark Ave public way as laid out in plan 7159 b sheet 3
and 5."
Thankyou
Dave Colpitts
r y < A W .,Vd 7�
x
79 u
6)v v To
A A I/a, J� /K o c-47,e
3�j
/i w /v
Alf-, 112 P?� T�f/Y e) Lzi
f
pop
A
i 7L
RECEIVED
OCT 14 2010'
DEPT OF PLANNING
OOMMUMTY DEVELID11VILLNT
Neighbors,
As you may already know,the area between Clark St and Clark Ave is currently under proposal by the NSD Realty Trust
to build a cluster development of 26 house lots. A cluster development allows a developer to build more houses than
what would be allowed under current zoning. In exchange,open space is often set aside for use by the public and/or
the developer may agree to fund ing/performing improvements to the neighborhood.This proposal is currently before
the City's Planning Board and is open for public discussion. There has already been one meeting on Sept 17 and the next
is scheduled for Oct 15.We have an opportunity to express our concerns and have them added to the official record.We
have developed a preliminary list of concerns for you to review and ask for any input you wish to add. Initially,we have
grouped the concerns into categories. Feel free to add your thoughts to any group or suggest a new category.
Please feel free to send your feedback to Bill Colbert 978-979-1705 37 Clark St dwcolbert@comcast.net so that it can be
included in the final letter
TRAFFIC
• Already increased on Barnes Rd/Clark St connector due to building of Dunkin Donuts on corner of Clark St and
Highland Ave.
• Doubles the number of cars all needing to exit the subdivision via the intersection of Clark Ave and Clark St
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at first blind corner on Clark Ave
• Increases possibility of head-on crashes at blind corner in vicinity of 20 Clark St
Increases possibility of head-on crashes at double-blind corners on Barnes Rd
CITY WATER
• All home owners, current and new, need assurance that the home water pressure will be adequate
• All home owners, current and new, need assurance that the sewage pumping stations will be
adequate
STORM WATER RUNOFF
Developer's plan is supposed to alleviate this issue with the installation of street sewers directing the water into
2 different storm water management systems. Abutters should have some kind of recourse if this issue is
worsened instead of improved.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANAGEMENT
• All home owners need assurance from the Fire Department that theirtrucks will be able to access all homes and
have sufficient hydrant access as well as water pressure
• Will there be a neighborhood fire alarm box?
PERIMETER WALKWAY
• Proposed to circle the subdivision around the outer perimeter.This is along the back property lines of the
proposed lots
• Since it is impossible to get input from the potential new homeowners, it remains for us to give MORE value to
the concerns of the current property owners:
• We do not want this walkway
• We feel that the benefits will be far outweighed by the undesirable issues it will bring
Homeless squatters raiding peoples'yards and homes
Fires and refuse
Drug abusers and their paraphernalia
Teen-age hell-raisers drinking and leaving behind empty bottles and cans
• We would prefer a more centrally located park/playground area that allows increased visibility for safety
and a sense of community much like the old principle of the "town well".
LOT 27—ZONES FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
• The only access to this lot is all the way through the new development which is already overburdened with
increased traffic.
• If this lot is ever developed there will no doubt be a marked increase in traffic from the people working at this
industrial site—driving past all the new homes and children that they have no vested interest in.
• We would prefer open space to be centrally located and would consider supporting the rezoning of the
industrial portion of the parcel to R-1 To enable relocation of open space to a more central area. IF IT IS SO
IMPORTANT TO THE DEVELOPERS/CITY TO CREATE-OPEN SPACE- FOR THE RESIDENTS ASTHETICS,WHY FORCE
ON THEM SOMETHING THEY DO NOT WANT.
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS
• Review existing storm basins that are expected to absorb the extra runoff being directed from the new
development to ensure they have the appropriate capacity.
• New catch basins at the intersection of Clark St and Clark Ave
• New catch basin in vicinity of 19-21 Clark St to alleviate large ice collection that occurs every winter.
• Weekly street cleaning during construction
• Take steps to control dust and noise
X "Y'
/oil
03;9A71
07,-R2P9
/��970,0
07jAqi)A
07�25 at
OMaffi ;R33
0�0,
30
Guqu 07A
07-W37
01 1
07
03;a -;g2
;g2
01,01
e� 0;ppi 074�19
�-11112 OW7
-illk,
a%?l
ow
03411 14
1"4, 0 W- 7
0 3?
0A95
01iQ2P3
03 07"6 07,QW2 k
07 008 07
OU118 —'k
031JW7,
nM29--———————— —— - --—————
L4- ------------J
7711- 7—
S
CITY
is/ 1.541 14.9 148
of
.4
4
SALEM, MA
AVENUE
E; ANA:
13,
02A21
062P4 j
oz�R%23
le
JI
11c
ASSESSOR
Ars -,114
Legend
Easement 7- �7— G�
Railroad
------ Map Index Outline 1z"ECEIVED
Building Footprints %
I OCT 14 2015
Water
DEPT,OF PLANNING&
COMMU,'417Y DEVELOP
MENT
JEANETTE H,TOROK CEIPGE M. &
07-0008 CIL;�. FIALLO N
ALFRED & JOAN JOSEPH & PAUL, PAULETTE. JOHN 17-0003 RINE M.
FQMCES LUCIANO LOUSE P. SLOSON LOR
07-0007
07-0005 & SCOTT LEBLANC GAGNE TRUST CIR ESMA HYSENESHI WILL" M MONROE, JR�
07-0004 07-0076 D7-0002 07 0086 ESAM Y. XBD�-GADIR
07-COCI
RICHARD L. O'DAY N',\ If
03-0137
DSWR
..E.T A
OPEN SPACE 1
LOT 2 AREA=168,388 S.F. I CERTIFY THAT I �VE CONFORMED
P 1 R L 3 NTH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS
7,697 S.F (44.100± S.F. WETLANDS)
A 7.41 S.F. A, OF THE RE ISTERS OF DEEDS 14
PREPARING THIS -1LAN.
A�,UI A 0,
PUT, LOT 4 -ART
-WILLIMS ek SP GES LCC
7.492 S.F.
------------
R.
.MF 5
7,421 S.F.. -------
AD
'01EFFIRSY & 4 LOT �e,
E N I ROGATO A...... Q,
LLE 11TY
D2'0046 MDUEHT
ROADWAY
JO- EA�FMENT LOT 13 1'��3 S.F.
s\
Cj� OF SALEM
B LOT 14 PLT
12.4JQ1 S.F. PILANNING BOARD
2
'T I—
7
A
BIT
12 LOT 15
L.17 12.973 S.F.
---------------------
L 1 1
A, LOT LOT 9 LOT 11 ---------------------
6.798 S.F. Reg 7994 BE
LO
T 10
"*N4 I, -------------------
Af 4 A� LOT 16 e
C 1 0.245 S.F. al Br7.i2 ;.F
A S
9,
A
CIO
A., --------
LOT 17 pw
14
8.233 S.F.
-2"11
A.
1� 12�25 A-
A., 1 11 -V�R�
OR,
T-q -------
lf;T 18 V
r A
SALTY TRUI
06-0019 TADEUSZ &
F. L
,:ON
el JOANf
\1 7 13 19 1. I� �CT SALEM
z Z, LO CONSEWA710M DATE: -—-------------
4V I, I� CO..SSION
,A
/ C6-0011
I.A2 7.GOW-
LAJI A.
RECEIVED
7.853 S.F.
`TS In
B, LOT 23
OCT 14 2015 Pq LOT 20
4.709 S.F. 8,251 S.F--
DEPT OF PLANNING J.- L4 22
C OMMUMW De&"MENT A, LOT 2 ij 7,vio S F.. -D LOCATION
'sl I SCALE
9.404 S.F. roirE LINE
M- DENOTES A GRANITE STOKE BOUND
N ON THE PLAIN A I WITH A DRILL HOIE TO BE SET,
CLERKS CEWIFICATIO G'. w,,v 13 HKMN v0l
5� "t, i
DATE.
Cl ER4 OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO
A ER,
H CERTIFY THAT-HE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY
THE �ILANNNG BOARD HAS BEEN RECENED.0 RECORDED AT THIS
OF
LID, AUD CAT NO APPEAL WAS PEC'NED DURING THE TWENTY SIJRYA &
DAYS N--�T AFIEN SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF BAD NOTICE. SABI WPYO
06-5015
DEFINITIVE PLAN
-- ---- "THE WOODLANDS"SUBDIVISION
A
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
OWNER-
BARBARA DRISCOLL 9 AL
LOT 27 IS WALLACE ROAD
147.992 S.F. A
-YNN. A 01901
-C CORTE 36055,3,056,36057 WILLIAMS
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE 2 APPLICANT
ZCIE, GNE-FAMILI INDUSTRIAL ONE-AMILY AREA=135,070 S.F. NSO RENLI-RUST SPARAGE-S
76 CA ILE STREET
(R,) 00 (R') CLUSTER NM C
(47.500± Sf. WET-��[)S) LIN., AA 01905
PRONE T LOCUS- ROATH-0—
A M:N�.LM LOT FRONTAGE: 100 7 "T �NONE) T 119
MATE RU
a 11.NIL LOT APOI 7 50 FT ONE) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS L-ANK AVENUE SALEM, MA
N, M EA ",CGO OF. 40,000 S F. (NONE) �OTAL PARCEL AREA-750.538 S�T. ASSESSORS REFERENCE- PRO E:(97l)SNHWH
MI M-. LOT s
LOT CC�EFAJOE BY BUILDING 30% 45% 30% MNL OPEN SPACE REOUIRED - 150.108 SY. (20% OF TOTAL) MAR 6 PANELS 7. 8& 9 FAK DID�3�..
VAAjVUN (WIN, OPEN SPACE UTILAND RE LIKED 5 5 -OPEN SPACE R-OU.RED)
FLIGHT OF BUILDING 35 7 45 1 35 IFT -0 ��,7 .0�, "ICH IS 50% 01 - -
OPEN SEA, 'aVDED - 30��,158 S,F� 0' 20- 40- SIX DEFINITIVE SHEET I OF 2
a MMMUM FRCLT YARD: 157 30 1 IS `7 (OPEN SPACE LP-NND PROVIDED = 211.SA81 S.F.) �111�
MN:MLIM SIDE YARD LID.7 30 FT 10 `7 -I'=4Y
M=Um REAR -ARD: 30 FT 30 FTI 30 `7
I SHEET 2 OF 10
AUGUST 14,ZOI 5
foKM -C DeCj�5'�OM
WDOCML CIUSICk
MA
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
telb Fig 22
CITY CLE"K.
Form C—Decision
Definitive Subdivision Decision, Stormwater Permit, and Cluster Residential Development
Special Permit
Clark Avenue (Map 6 Lots 7, 8 and 9)
February 22, 2016
Serafini, Darling and Correnti, LLP
C/o Attorney Correnti.
63 Federal Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
RE: Decision of the Clark Avenue Subdivision—Form C (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9)
On September 17, 2015, the Salem Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for a proposal
submitted by NSD Realty Trust (hereafter referred to as "applicant") to allow the
construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots on Clark Avenue,
Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9. The public hearing for the Definitive Subdivision, Form
C and Cluster Residential Special Permit was continued to October 15, 2015. At the October
15, 2015, public hearing the Salem Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for the proposal
of a Stormwater Permit to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance greater than one
acre of land within the City of Salem for the subject subdivision. The Cluster Residential
Special Permit and Stormwater Permit were continued to the November 19, 2015, December
3, 2015, December 17, 2015, January 7, 2016, January 21, 2016, February 4, 2016, and
February 18, 2016.
At the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on February 18, 2016, the public hearing
for the Form C-Definitive Subdivision, Cluster Residential Development Special Permit,
Stormwater was closed and the Board voted Seven (7) in favor, (Ben Anderson, Matt Veno,
Helen Sides, Kirt Rieder, Carole Hamilton, Dale Yale, and Noah Koretz) none opposed, to
approve the project. Furthermore the Board finds that all standards for the issuance of the
Special Permits has been met by the Owner and that the Plan is in harmony with the purpose
and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and would not result in a net negative environmental
impact. The Board finds that the subdivision meets the purposes of cluster residential
development because the plan is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance to protect and promote health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the
inhabitants of the city and will not result in a net negative environmental impact. The Board
finds that the subdivision meets the purposes of residential development because it promotes
the more efficient use of land in harmony with existing natural features.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 2 of I I
The Board recognized that the building lots created and the buildings to be constructed
thereon may have dimensional controls and density regulations varying from those otherwise
permitted by the ordinance or by-law and the approvals are subject to the allowing conditions
and waivers and/or relief:
1. Conformance with the Plan
a. Work shall conform to the set of plans containing sheets I through 11, entitled, "The
Woodlands", and prepared by Williams and Sparages, 189 North Main Street, Suite
101, Middleton, MA 01949, dated August 17, 2015, and revised September 4, 2015;
November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015; and January 22, 2016 and the landscaping
plans entitled, "Clark Avenue Entry Perspective" and "Entry Planting Plan" dated
December 2, 2015 prepared by LeBlanc Jones Architects, Inc.
2. Endorsement of the Plans
a. Following the statutory twenty (20) day appeal period, the Planning Board will
endorse the original subdivision plans, subject to conditions of this decision, which
shall be recorded at the South Essex Registry ,of Deeds. Prior to endorsement of the
plans, the following items must be submitted for approval by the Planning Board:
i. A covenant to secure the construction of ways and installation of municipal
services, including required description of mortgages and assents of
mortgagees.
ii. Acceptable form of grants of easements, if applicable.
iii. This decision shall be referenced on the original plans prior to the endorsement
by the Planning Board; the decision shall be recorded with the plans at the
Essex South Registry of Deeds.
3. Amendments
a. Any modification to the approved plans must receive the prior approval of the
Planning Board unless deemed insignificant by the City Planner. Any waiver of
conditions contained within this decision shall require approval of the Planning
Board.
4. Subdivision Regulations
a. The Subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the
Subdivision Rules and Regulations and any other applicable regulations as affected
by this decision.
5. Waivers
a. In approving the Plans, the Board is hereby granting the following waivers of the
Subdivision Rules and Regulations:
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 3 of I I
i. Section IV A.4.a: Maximum Length of Dead-end Streets is waived to allow a
length of 1089.03 feet based on the requirement for the installation of sprinkler
systems in the dwellings.
ii. SectionIVA.I.f: Minimum centerline radii of two hundred thirty feet for a
curved street.
iii. Section IV: Right of way improvements which require street trees to be 3.5
inches caliper, 30 feet on center, in place thereof allow 2 trees per lot.
iv. Section IV A.2.a.: Minimum width of sidewalk for a minor/deadend street 5
feet, in place thereof allow a 4 foot concrete sidewalk with a grass strip of no
less than 3.5 feet on each side.
b. In the judgment of the Planning Board, the granting of the above waivers is in the
public interest and consistent with the intent of the subdivision control law.
6. Transfer of Ownership
a. Within five days of transfer of ownership of the subdivision, the Owner shall notify
the Board in writing of the new owner's name and address. This shall not include the
sale of lots within the subdivision in the ordinary course of business, but only a sale
of the entire subdivision. The terms, conditions, restrictions and/or requirements of
this decision shall be binding on the Owner and its successors and/or assigns.
7. Security (Section HI(B)(5) of the Subdivision Regulations)
a. Prior to the release of any lots for sale or building, the Planning Board shall require
that an acceptable form of surety is posted along with a proposed schedule of releases.
If partial release of surety is to be requested, the Planning Board may, at its discretion,
require deposits to be broken down in amounts of anticipated requests for release. The
applicant agrees to complete the required improvements in accordance with Section V
of the Subdivision Regulations for the subdivision. Such construction and installation
is to be secured by one and/or in part by the other of the following methods which
may from time to time be varied by the applicant with the reasonable approval of the
Planning Board.
b. Endorsement of Approval with Covenant
The Owner shall file a covenant, prior to endorsement by the Planning Board,
executed and to be duly recorded with the Subdivision Plans by the owner of
record, which instrument shall the land, and shall state such ways and services
shown on the approved plans dated August 17, 2015, and revised September 4,
2015; November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015 and January 22, 2016 shall be
provided to serve any and all lots before any lot may be built upon or
conveyed, other than by mortgage; and deed; and/or
i. Endorsement of Approval with Bonds, Surety or Tri-Party Agreement
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 4 of I I
The Owner shall either file a performance bond, a deposit of money or
negotiable securities, or a tri-party agreement in an amount determined by the
Board to be sufficient to cover the cost of all or any one phase of the sub-
division of the improvements. Surety, if filed or deposited, shall be approved
as to form and manner of execution by the City Solicitor and as to sureties by
the City Treasurer and shO be contingent on the construction of the roadway
through binder course. The amount of the surety shall be reasonably
determined by the Engineering Department.
The Owner may file a covenant to secure the construction of ways and
services for the entire sub-division and said covenant may be partially released
for phases of the sub-division by bond, surety or tri-party agreement being
filed for any phase or phases of the subdivision.
ii. Time Frame
If such ways and services are not completed within two (2) years of the date of
endorsement of the plan, approval of the plan may be rescinded unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Board. The Planning Board
acknowledges that the tinieftame and completion of the entire subdivision is
anticipated to be two years, and will not unreasonably withhold extensions.
8. Homeowner's Association
a. The Draft Home Owners Association Documents shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning and Community Development, for reasonable review as to
form and content prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for the
proposed dwellings. These documents shall include the following responsibilities:
i. Ownership and/or maintenance of the storm water management system;
ii. Ownership and/or maintenance of the trail system and open space (if the open
space and trail system are not to be owned by the City of Salem).
iii. Ownership and/or maintenance of walls located in the subdivision that are not
situated on the lots in the sub-division.
b. The City of Salem reserves the right to enforce the responsibilities and requirements
of the Homeowner's Association documents.
9. Open Space
a. Open Space as shown on the Plans and consisting of approximately 1.95 acres shall
be perpetually preserved as open space. The Open Space shall be placed in a
corporation or trust owned or to be owned by the owners of lots within the
subdivision with provisions for limited easements for recreational use by residents of
the City of Salem; provided that such ownership shall vest the Board sufficient rights
to enforce compliance with restrictions imposed by the Board as a condition of its
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 5 of 11
Cluster Special Permit. The easement documents shall allow for passive, non-
motorized recreation and shall empower the City at its discretion, to make
improvements to the trail system.
b. The open space shall be opened for public use upon the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the final dwelling or at such an earlier time as mutually agreed to by
the applicant and the Board.
10.Salem Conservation Commission
a. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation
Commission prior to commencement of any work.
11.Trails
a. Prior to the release of the final Certificate of Occupancy, the trail for the open space
will be laid, flagged and completed by the Owner. The path shall consist of woodchip
surface as it will have the least impact on the natural setting.
b. Trail segments will be cleared by manual cuffing of brush and tree saplings no greater
than a 3 inch caliper to facilitate passage. All materials cut or cleared shall be chipped
and left in place. No earthmoving, grading or mowing will occur. Small brush will be
cut and dispersed into the underbrush for wildlife habitat value. No tracked vehicles
or mechanical equipment (other than chippers, clippers, loppers, and small chain saws
for the clearing) will be employed.
c. Signage identifying the open space area is to be installed at the trailheads. Sign
design and proposed location shall be submitted for approval to the City Planner prior
to installation.
12.Safety Improvements
a. The applicant has agreed to paint a crosswalk which will lead from the end of the
sidewalk on the northeasterly side of Clark Avenue to the sidewalk on the
southwesterly side of Clark Avenue (which continues to the intersection with Clark
Street). The exact location shall be approved by the City's Police Safety Officer.
b. The applicant has also agreed to paint a center line on a portion of existing Clark
Avenue to guide motorists through the bend. The striping and signage shall be
installed as shown on the "Proposed Traffic Marking & Signage Plan", dated
February 1, 2016, prepared by Williams & Sparages.
c. The applicant has agreed to repair the sidewalk as needed at the northerly end of
Clark Avenue from the end of the existing granite curbing on Clark Avenue northerly
to the intersection of Clark Avenue and Clark Street.
d. The applicant shall work with the City and remove a the rock at I Clark Avenue and
realigning the fence impeding sight distance on Clark Avenue once the City obtains
approval from the private land owner.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 6 of 11
13.Board of Health
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Board of
Health.
b. The applicant shall provide the City Health Agent the name, address and telephone
number of the project manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the
construction of the project.
c. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency
Plan, no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible
for the site certifies that the soil and ground water on the entire site meets the DEP
standards for the proposed use.
d. The developer shall adhere to the drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer.
e. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area
prior to construction, demolition, and/or basting and shall send a copy of the
exterminators invoice to the Health Agent.
f. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
g. The developer shall submit the City Health Agent a written plan for dust control and
street sweeping which will occur during construction.
h. The developer shall submit the City Health Agent a written plan for the containment
and removal or debris, vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material
generated during demolition and/or construction.
i. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for firefighting.
j. Noise levels from the resultant establishments generated by operations, including but
not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level
by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels at the property line.
k. The developer shall disclose in writing to the City Health Agent the origin of any fill
material needed for the project.
1. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its
operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health.
in. The developer shall install grease traps, to contain grease in gray water, prior to
entering the city sewer system in developments with 10 or more units and in
compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer.
n. Radon mitigation systems shall be installed.
o. The final construction shall comply with all requirements of the Massachusetts State
Sanitary code.
p. The developer shall notify the City Health Agents when the project is complete for
final inspection and confirmation that the above conditions have been met.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 7 of 11
14.Drainage Infrastructure Improvements
a. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark
Avenue as depicted on the plan entitled "Proposed Drainage Improvement Plan in
Salem, MA" dated December 16, 2015, revised January 27, 2016, prepared by
Williams & Sparages. The drainage improvements shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, including temporary pavement of the trenches,
within ninety (90) days of work starting on the proposed subdivision site. Temporary
paving shall remain and be maintained by the applicant, until the proposed
subdivision is ready for final overlay at which time all final offsite overlay paving
will be performed in conjunction with the final overlay of the subdivision.
b. The pavement replacement program applied to Clark Avenue shall consist of P/2
inches of overlay paving per the limits of the Williams & Sparages plan referenced in
paragraph a. above. Final grading of the top mix shall promote stormwater
conveyance to the newly installed and existing drainage facilities on Clark Street and
not cause any issues with existing driveways. Pavement will take place in
conjunction with the final overlay being performed within the Woodlands
Subdivision.
c. If deemed necessary, prior to beginning the drainage improvement work the applicant
shall file a Request for Determination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation
Commission and a Notice of Intent.
15.Sewer
a. The applicant shall pay One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) to the City for
the performance of an Infiltration and Inflow Identification and Removal program for
the approximately 2,700 linear foot sewer system to which the proposed subdivision
shall discharge sewerage. This $100,000 payment equals a contribution of$3,846.15
per house in the proposed subdivision of 26 homes.
b. Payments by the applicant to the City shall be made in accordance with the following
schedule:
i. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first house
lot;
ii. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the eighth house
lot;
iii. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the sixteenth
house lot; and
iv. $ 25,000.00 payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for the twenty-
fourth house lot.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 8 of 11
16.Fire Department
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Fire
Department, including temporary access during construction.
17.Building Inspector
a. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Salem Building
Inspector.
18.Lighting
a. Street lighting shall be in conformances; with the plan dated August 17, 2015, and
revised September 4, 2015; November 10, 2015; December 7, 2015 and January 22,
2016.
b. Street lighting installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Electrician.
Street lights shall be outfitted with LED bulbs. The street lighting shall be the
responsibility of the Applicant until such time as the City accepts the street.
c. The Owner shall coordinate with the electric company and the City Electrician regarding
the installation of street lighting within the Subdivision.
19.Noise
a. HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further
mitigate noise emanating from HVAC units if the Board of Health receives any
complaints. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the guideline for reviewing such noise is
that the broadband sound level should not increase by more than 10 dB (A) above the
ambient levels measured at the property line.
b. The method of screening HVAC units shall be submitted to the City Planner for
review and approval prior to installation.
20.Pre-Construction Conference
a. Prior to the start of work on the approved subdivision, a pre-construction conference
shall be scheduled with the City Planner, the City Engineer (or his designee), the
Building Commissioner, the Health Agent, and any other departments that may be
necessary. The Owner shall submit a construction schedule at the time of the pre-
construction conference.
21.Construction Practices
a. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions:
i. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,
regulations, and ordinances of the City of Salem.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 9 of I I
ii. No work shall commence before 8:00 AM on weekdays and Saturdays. No
work shall continue beyond 5:00 PM. There shall be no work conducted on
Sundays or holidays. Inside work of a quite nature may be permitted at other
times.
iii. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday — Friday between 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. There shall be no drilling or blasting, or rock hammering on
Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance
with all local and state regulations.
iv. The pre-blast survey shall be extended to include the existing subsurface drain.
V. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of
construction on abutters. Advanced notice shall be provided to all abutters in
writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction.
vi. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they
do not leave direct and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the
site.
vii. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,
regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem.
viii. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site must be completely located
on the site.
ix. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be
-submitted by the applicant to the Building Inspector for review and approval
prior to the issuance of a building permit. Including in this plan, but not
limited to, shall be information regarding how equipment will be stores, a
description of the construction staging areas and its location in relation to the
site, and where the construction employees will pack their vehicles.
22.Blasting
a. The applicant or argent shall distribute the flyers entitled, "Facts for Massachusetts
Property Owners about Blasting" to all abutters within two hundred fifty (250) feet of
the blasting area.
23. Construction Traffic
a. With the exception of off-site improvements required as part of this decision, all
construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within City
right of ways. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of
Planning& Community Development prior to construction.
b. A construction traffic management plan and schedule shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning & Community Development for review and approval prior to
the start of construction.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page 10 of I I
c. Any roadways, driveways, or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be
restored to their original condition by the Owner.
d. The Owner shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site, and
clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as necessary.
24.Progress Reports
a. Upon the request of the Planning Board, the owner shall submit reports of the
progress of the subdivision's completion.
25.Clerk of the Works
a. A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the expense of the applicant,
his successors or assigns, as it deemed necessary by the City Planner.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to
controlled construction, which requires oversight by licensed engineered and
architects. Accordingly it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the
Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site
improvements related to the project located within the public way, including all utility
connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the
expense associated with the Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of
hours and at a customary rate of service.
b. The applicant shall submit a construction plan to the City Planner each season, prior
to starting work.
c. The construction plan will be incorporated into the Clerk of the Works Task Order.
No work shall start prior to an approved task order for these services.
26.Utilities
a. The applicant shall have an engineer certify the utility plans for review by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building permit. The utility plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Office of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any
Building Permit.
b. All utilities shall be installed underground.
c. A plan for sidewalks shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to
the issuance of any Building Permit.
d. The applicant shall install concrete sidewalks with vertical granite curbing throughout
the subdivision, according to the approved plans.
e. Any utility installation for housing lots shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
Clark Avenue Subdivision
February 22,2016—page I I of I I
27.As-built Plans
a. As-built plans and Street Acceptance Plans, stamped by a Registered Professional
Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community
Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of the final
Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets.
b. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format
suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of
the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any
streets.
c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a
certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was
completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the
City Engineer prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the
subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets; as well as, any subsequent
requirements by the City Engineer.
28.Violations
a. Violation of any condition contained within this decision may result in revocation of
this permit by the Planning Board.
This endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing certification of the
City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that is such
appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South
Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the
owner's Certificate of Title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner
or applicant.
I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans are on file with the City Clerk and a
copy is on file with the Planning Board.
Sincerely,
Beni I An erson, Chair
Salem Planning Board
C�-,�-V- t-\N e VA L)
Applicant: Project No. SALE-0026
NSD Realty Trust
76 Oakville Street
Lynn, MA 01905
Environmental Impact
Statement
Proposed Cluster
Residential Subdivision
""The Woodlands"
Clark Avenue
Salem, Massachusetts
August 14, 2015
-w
C(a WHUAMS
SPARAGES
T
S
189 North Main Street,Suite 101
Middleton,MA 01949
RECEIVED 978-539-8088 Ph
978-539-8200 Fax
AUG 2 12015 www.wsen&eers.com
BEPT OF PLANNM&
COMMLwy DEVELOPMEW
Natural Environment
1. Air
The principal source of dust is during the construction phase. Dust will result from drilling in
rock areas and during placement of gravel road base.The project is not expected to generate
any noticeable amount of smoke or odors.
Wetting with water will be practiced over exposed soil areas to minin-dze dust,as may be
required by weather conditions.Times of soil exposure will be relatively minimal due to the
existence of shallow to exposed bedrock throughout the upland portions of the subdivision.
The subdivision is bordered by existing homes on the west and north.According to the Salem
Harbor wind and weather statistics, the prevailing winds vary in direction throughout the year
with an average wind speed between 2 and 7 mph. No incineration will occur in the
subdivision.
2. Land
The site of the proposed subdivision is vacant.Topography is varied with surface slopes
ranging from two to thirty-five percent.The site is wooded.Wetland resource areas are located
in the south and north portions of the site.
The major limitation posed by the land is shallow to exposed bedrock and slopes. Rock removal
will be accomplished by blastin&which will be conducted in accordance with all applicable
local and state regulations.No percolation tests were conducted on site since the subdivision
will connect to public sewer.
Approximately 8.5 acres or 49 percent of the site Will be altered by the construction of proposed
roadways,dwellings and landscape areas. Lot 27 consists of 3.39 acres or 19.7 percent of the site
and its developed characteristics have not yet been determined. All of the land is undeveloped
woodland.Proposed grading plans have been designed to adapt to existing grading patterns to
the maximum feasible extent Ihe grading design is depicted on Sheets 5 and 6 in the Definitive
Plan set.Wetland resource areas are sirrdlarly shown on Sheets 5 and 6 and are discussed in the
next section of this document
3. Water and Wetlands
The proposed development for lots 1 through 26 is residential in nature.The major potential
impact upon water quality would be from pollutants found in storm water runoff. Best
Management Practices (BMPs)in accordance with Massachusetts DEP Storm Water
Management Policy have been incorporated into the subdivision design in order to improve
runoff quality.
2
An erosion control plan for the construction period will be provided in the Stormwater Report
to be submitted in a separate document as part of the Notice of Intent filing with the
Conservation Comn-dssion.
Stormwater Management
The proposed stormwater management system includes surface and subsurface structures in
order to prevent an increase in runoff rates from the site. Calculations for site runoff are
included in the Mitigative Drainage Analysis,and,are summarized as follows:
Description 24 hour Existing Proposed
Type III Condition Condition
Storm Event Peak Rate of Peak Rate of
(year) Runoff Runoff
(Q)cfs. (Q) cfs.
Flow 2 (3.1 inch) 5.1 . 4.6
towards 10(4.5 inch) 9.7 8.1
Clarke Ave. 100(6.5 inch) 17.0 13.3
Link 132L
Flow 2 (3.1 inch) Z6 6.9
towards the 10(4.5 inch) 16.5 14.6
southern 100 (6.5 inch) 31.0 27.3
wetlands
Link 139L
Flow 2(3.1 inch) 4.8 4.7
towards the 10(4.5 inch) 11.3 9.3
northern 100(6.5 inch) 22.2 17.5
wetlands
Link 128L
Total flow 2 (3.1 inch) 12.1 11.2
discharging 10(4.5 inch) 2Z5 23.4
from project 100(6.5 inch) 52.8 43.8
area
Link 109L
3
Stormwater management areas will be placed where topographically feasible and in places
where there is opportunity for groundwater recharge to occur through the bottoms of the
systems.
Proposed sewage disposal will be into the existing City of Salem Municipal System. Since
wastewater ultimately flows to the S.E.S.D. treatment plant and following treatment is
discharged at sea,it is assumed that wastewater from the proposed subdivision will have no
impact upon surface or groundwater supplies.
4. Energy
Energy will be supplied to the proposed subdivision in the form of underground electric&gas
services provided by the appropriate utility companies.
5. Noise
The most noticeable change in ambient noise levels will occur during the construction phase
and will result from construction machinery,rock removal operations,and construction of the
proposed dwellings.Construction days and hours of operation will adhere to the Ordinances of
the City of Salem.
Wildlife will likely be temporarily displaced by construction activity but will tend to reestablish
following completion of work in the proposed open spaces.
Once work is completed,ambient noise levels will be similar to those occurring in the existing
residential neighborhoods abutting the subdivision.
6. Local Flora and Fauna
It is anticipated that upland habitat for marnmals and songbirds will be disturbed during
construction.Typically,those habitats re-establish after completion of construction. Existing
vegetation will be removed in areas of proposed construction and new plantings installed as
necessary for landscaping and screening purposes. The site is not located within the estimated
habitat of rare wetlands wildlife as determined by reference to the Massachusetts Division of
Wildlife Natural Heritage Mapping.
4
Man Made Environment
1. Land Use
The site hes partially within an R-1 Zoning District(north of Clark Avenue) and partially within
an Industrial Zoning District. Within the R-1 Zoning District,single family homes are an
allowed use on lots having a minimum area of 15,000 square feet.
Lots I through 26 are proposed as a Cluster Development under Section 7-14 of Salem Zoning
Ordinance in order to preserve both wetland and upland open space. Lot 27,located off of Road
A,consists of 3.397 acres,of which,2.962 acres lie within the Industrial Zone. Development of
that lot will be reviewed under Section 7-18 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance.
Land use to the north and west of the site is typically for single family homes. Land to the south
and east of the site is undeveloped and privately or municipally owned.
There are no existing public open areas within the perimeter of the subdivision.An area of open
space,comprising a land area of 6.967 acres is proposed.That land will be available for
recreational use by the residents of the city.
Major shopping and service facilities are located within.5 to 1.5 miles of the site on Highland
Avenue.The approximate relationship of the site to public educational facilities is as follows:
Witchcraft Heights Elementary School-2.5 miles
Collins Middle School-2.3 miles
Salem High School-1.8 miles
MBTA Service is available within.3 miles of the site on Highland Avenue.Recreational facilities
are located throughout the City within.75 to approximately 4 miles of the site.
2. Density
Proposed dwellings in the cluster subdivision (Lots 1-26)are expected to be approximately
1,500 square feet in ground coverage and will contain 3 to 4 bedrooms.
All dwellings will be serviced by an individual driveway and include a two car garage.
Proposed development characteristics of Lot 27 have not been determined at this time.
5
TABLE OF PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE
Total Site Area=17.229 Acres
Cover Type Area (Ac) Percent Coverage
Dwellings 0.895 5.2
Area within Roads A&B 1.472 8.5
Driveways 0.325 1.9
Dedicated Open Space 6.967 40.4
Individual Yard Areas 4.173 24.2
Undetermined(Lot 27) 3.397 19.8
3. Zoning Total: 17.229 Ac. 100.0
The site and surrounding parcels are located in the R-1 and Industrial Zoning Districts. As
previously discussed,Lots 1 through 26 in the proposed subdivision are being applied for under
the Cluster Provisions of Section 7-14 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Minimum individual lot
dimensional characteristics that follow are the same as shown on the previously approved plans:
Lot Area (None)
Lot Width (None)
Lot Coverage 30%
Front Yard 15 Feet
Side Yard 10 Feet
Rear Yard 30 Feet
Building Height 35 Feet
Conventional zoning dimensional characteristics are as follows:
Residential ont:famfly(Rl) Industrial M)
Lot Area 15,000 square feet 40,000 square feet
Lot Width 100 feet 150 feet
Lot Coverage 30% 45%
Front Yard 15 feet 30 feet
Side Yard 10 feet 30 feet
Rear Yard 30 feet 30 feet
Building Height 35 feet 45 feet
6
4. Architecture
Proposed dwellings are to be two story,wood frame construction on concrete foundations. Each
dwelling will contain a two car garage and 3 to 4 bedrooms. Visual impacts from properties
adjacent to the site will be buffered by proposed open space areas.
Two of the proposed homes will be approximately 70-80 feet from the existing homes on Clark
Avenue Extension. The remaining proposed homes will be over MY to any of the existing
homes located on Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension.
5. Historic Buildings,Historical Sites,and Archeological Sites
There are no known historical buildings or sites or archeological sites on or immediately
adjacent to the site to the best of our knowledge. It should be noted that there is evidence of an
old foundation and walls that exist on the property currently.
Public Facilities
1. Water supply,flow pressure and distribution.
The source of water to be supplied to the subdivision is municipal,as delivered by the City of
Salem. Water mains will be 8 inch diameter,cement-lined ductile iron and will be located in the
subdivision as depicted on the Definitive Plans.The twenty-six proposed dwellings are
expected to have an average daily demand of 10,000 gallons and a peak demand of
approximately 45 gallons per n-dnute based on an average of 3.5 bedrooms per dwelling and 110
gallons per bedroom per day. Firefighting demand is estimated to be 750 gallons per minute
(calculation to be verified with static pressure testing by applicant).
2. Sanitary Sewerage
Sanitary sewerage facilities,within the proposed subdivision,will consist of an eight-inch(8")
polyvinyl chloride(PVC)gravity force sewer line that will connect to the existing gravity sewer
located on Clark Avenue as shown on the definitive plans. Each dwelling will be serviced by an
individual four or six inch gravity connection.It is anticipated that upon acceptance of streets
by the City of Salem the gravity sewer within the street will be maintained by the Department
of Public Works.
Expected wastewater volumes and flows approximately are as follows:
Average Daily Flow: ±10,000 Gallons
Peak Daily Flow: ±45 Gallons per minute
The proposed wastewater discharge is not anticipated to have a measurable impact upon
existing public facilities.
7
3. Storm Drainage Facilities
Street drainage will consist of a series of piped manholes and catch basins leading to
stormwater management areas to be located in the open space parcels and one subsurface
facility to be located on Lot 12. The street drainage system has been designed with the
minimurn capacity for a ten year storm.
Stormwater management areas have been designed to prevent any runoff increase for two, ten
or one hundred year storms,consistent with Massachusetts DEP Stormwater Management
Policy.Runoff from the site will discharge into existing wetlands.
Calculations for the design of the various elements of the storm drainage system are provided
in the Mitigative Drainage Analysis dated August 14,2015 by Williams&Sparages.
4. Disposition of Stormwater
See definitive plans for locations of stoninwater management areas and outfalls.See Mitigative
Drainage Analysis for more information on rates of runoff and quantity of stormwater to be
discharged.
5. Refuse Disposal
On average,it is estimated that the 26 homes would generate approximately 80 tons of
residential solid waste annually according to the EPA website.Of this,approximately 34% is
recycled and composted.on average. Collection and disposal of solid waste would be
accomplished by the City of Salem Municipal Contractor.
Construction debris will be kept in on site dumpsters and disposed of by licensed private
contractors. Brush will be chipped and used for mulch and/or temporary slope stabilization or
trail construction.
6. Traffic Facilities
Traffic entering and leaving the subdivision Will access Highland Avenue by way of Clark
Avenue and Barnes Road. Based on I.T.E. Land Use Code 210,an average daffy trip generation
rate of 260 trips (10.0/unit)would be projected. From the 26 homes,pedestrian circulation is
provided by means of sidewalks on each side of the proposed roadways. Each dwelling is
expected to have a two car garage and two driveway spaces.
7. Electric Power
The twenty-six dwellings comprising the proposed subdivision will receive electric power from
the National Grid by means of a new underground distribution system.The average
Massachusetts home is expected to require approximately 627 kWh/month according to
electricitylocal.com.
8
8. Gas
Natural Gas will be extended into subdivision from Clark Avenue. It is expected that all homes
will be heated with natural gas. It is likely that the majority of homes win also utilize gas for
cooking and clothes drying as well.
Community Services
1. Schools
It is estimated that the 26 homes in the proposed subdivision would result in 35 to 40 students if
all future residents were new to Salem.
Distances from the site to existing public school areas are as follows:
Witchcraft Heights School-2.5 miles
Collins Middle School-2.3 miles
Salem High School-1.8 miles
2. Recreation
The site is currently in private ownership and is thus unavailable for public use and/or
recreational facilities.The 6.967 acres of the site to be preserved as open space will be available
for access to the residents of Salern.Sidewalks are proposed throughout the subdivision and a
trail system will be constructed on the north-side of the site and connect to adjacent land to the
east owned by the City of Salem.
3. Police
Based on the 26 new homes proposed for the subdivision,a population of approximately 100
persons would be anticipated. Based on two cars per dwelling,approximately 52 cars would be
expected.Traffic impact is discussed in a previous section of this document.
4. Fire
Twenty six wood-frames,two story single family dwellings are proposed in the subdivision.As
discussed in the Public Facilities section of this document,a firefighting volume in excess of 750
gallons per minute,with a residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch is projected.The
source of that water is municipal supply from the City of SalenL Fire hydrant flow test data will
be provided under separate cover when completed.
9
5. Public Works
Two (2)new roadways having a total length of 1,388.02 feet are proposed.Proposed utility
characteristics are summarized as follows:
Gravity Sewer 1,440±LF
Water Main 1,400±LF
Storm Drain 1,230±LF
Human Considerations
1. Aesthetics and Visual Impact
The character of the area within which the proposed subdivision is proposed will change since
the parcel is now vacant.The proposed single family homes win be in keeping with the
character of the surrounding developed property.The density of the proposed development is
consistent with the requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance.Proposed open space
preservation and distance of proposed homes from existing will help diminish impacts on the
surrounding neighborhood.
2. Parks,Forests,and Recreational Areas
No portion of the site is currently available for public use.The cluster development proposal
would preserve 6.967 acres,or,40.4% as open space to which residents of the City would have
access.
3. Public Health
Any existing debris on site will be cleaned up and disposed of lawfully as construction
progresses. Rodent control will be managed by a licensed exterminator in accordance with the
project needs.
No debris,stumps,or other wastes resultant from the project will be buried or otherwise
disposed of on site.
10
Applicant: Project No. SALE-0026
NSD Realty Trust
76 Oakville Street
Lynn, MA 01905
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
Proposed Cluster
Residential Subdivision
""The Woodlands"
Clark Avenue
Salem, Massachusetts
August 14, 2015
-W,CC
& WILLIAMS
SPARAGES
T
S
189 North Main Street,Suite 101
Middleton,MA 01949
978-539-8088 Ph
978-539-8200 Fax
www.wsengin4Lers.com
I'A OF
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
Q PETE M.
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015 0 Z BLAISD L,JR.
CIVIL
Purpose: No. 41613
The purpose of this analysis is to compare the present or existing conditions and the post-
development or proposed watershed conditions for the proposed cluster residential subdivision by
analyzing the surface runoff rates to the limit of the watershed analysis shown on the accompanying
watershed maps. The results of which are presented on the summary tables that follow in order to
comply with the requirements of the Salem Massachusetts Subdivision Regulations.
Introduction:
The project is located on an presently vacant property (there is evidence of an old foundation on top
of the hill)with an address of Clark Avenue in the City of Salem. The project is bounded to the
north by residential properties located off of Clark Street, to the east by property owned now or
formerly(n/0 by the City of Salem and to the south by properties located off of Wyman Place and
n/f Lynn Sand&Stone Company located off of Robinson Road.
The proposal is to build two roadways,the first is a one thousand and eighty-nine (1089.03') shown
on the plans as"Road A",the second is a two hundred ninety-nine (298.99) shown on the plans as
Road B in order to provide access to a twenty-seven lot subdivision. Lots 1 through 26 are in the R1
Zone and will be a cluster residential subdivision, Lot 27 lies in both the R1 and I zones is not
showing any development at this time on the proposed plans. The construction of the dwellings
and roadway will include paved driveways,lawn,landscapin&sewer,drainage,stormwater
detention basins,a subsurface infiltration area,water services and other various utilities.
It should be noted that there are wetland resource areas located on the subject property and there
are proposed activities within the one-hundred(100')buffer zone to the edge of bordering vegetated
wetlands. Therefore,a Notice of Intent(NOD filing will be filed with the Salem Conservation
Commission at a later date.
Existing Condition Soils Analysis:
In order to model the runoff parameters for both the existing and proposed watershed parameters,
the parent soils on site were mapped using the Web Soil Survey(WSS) made available on the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)website.
The WSS provides vital soil data and information such as Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) which is
then input into a mathematical model to generate runoff curve numbers.
The user inputs the soil cover type as well as the hydrologic soil group to generate a weighted curve
number (CN)and also uses the topography of the land to generate a time of concentration (Tc) from
which the stormwater runoff rate as well as volume may be calculated for a certain watershed for
comparison. The soils present on site are comprised of Udorthents,smoothed and does not have a
rating for its HSG with the NRCS.
2
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
The NRCS lists the majority of this property as being Chatfield-Hollis-Rock Outcrop Complex with
hydrologic soil group B&C/D and a small portion on the southerly side as Whitman Loam with
hydrologic soil group D. In order to be consistent with the previously approved drainage analysis
by Eastern Land Survey,we have assumed that the hydrologic soil group for the property is "C".
We have also assumed that the hrrdt of the hydrologic soil group"D" soils is coincident with the
edge of bordering vegetated wetlands as shown on the accompanying watershed and soils maps.
For the proposed subsurface infiltration pond and the surface detention ponds we have assumed a
design infiltration rate of 0.27 in/hr. for"C" soils as found in the Hydrology Handbook for
Conservation Commissioners, March 2002 Table 2-1.
Stormwater Modeling Methodology:
The mathematical model used in this analysis was provided using the HydroCAD 9.10 Version
developed by HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC. HydroCAD is a program that is used to model
the hydrology and hydraulics of stormwater runoff and is based largely on programs and
techniques developed by NRCS,specifically TR-20 and TR-55 as well as other hydraulic calculation
methods.
HydroCAD allows the user,for a given rainfall event, to generate runoff hydrographs for single or
multiple watersheds and is used to determine if a given drainage system is adequate under the
desired conditions as well as to predict flooding or other impacts at specified locations such as
erosion.
Three (3) design storm events were analyzed and the results presented in the tables that follow for
the two (2)year, ten(10)year,and one-hundred (100)year storm events for comparison.
Existing Condit ion Watershed:
The limit of the watershed analysis has been delineated along the existing property fines and edge of
bordering vegetated wetlands including the up gradient areas tributary thereto for comparison with
the proposed condition as can be seen on the accompanying watershed maps.
Using the methods described in the stormwater modeling explanation above,runoff curve numbers
and times of concentration were generated for each watershed for the existing condition to be used
for comparison with the proposed condition described below. A schematic of the mathematical
model as well as the results of the calculations for the 2 year,10 year and 100 year,Type III,24-hour
storm events are included in this report.
Proposed Condition Watershed:
The proposed development requires the construction of four (4) surface detention ponds and a
subsurface infiltration pond to provide peak rate of runoff mitigation as well as groundwater
recharge opportunities in the volume provided below the pond outlets. However,because the
property has a lot of ledge and shallow to ledge areas,it is our opinion that there is not a lot of
infiltration occurring in the exiting condition on site but is mostly shedding off.
3
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Runoff from the roadway, driveways and some of the roof areas will be conected using deep-sump
catch basins with hoods from the paved surfaces and piped directly into the proposed stormwater
management areas,see plan for locations. Three-quarters (3/4) of the proposed roof area on Lot 12
will be directly discharged to the proposed subsurface infiltration system shown on the plans. The
rernammg roof areas will discharge to the ground and then discharge overland or be infiltrated into
the ground surface.
Pretreatment for the subsurface infiltration system will be through the use of the deep-sump catch
basins with hoods and 1,500 gallon sediment&oil separator unit. The remaining stormwater
management areas will receive pretreatment from deep-sump catch basins and sediment forebays
with overflow spillways.
The subsurface infiltration structure will be comprised of Cultec 330XL XD Heavy Duty Recharger
units (or approved equivalent) connected together with internal manifolds and inspection ports
brought to finish grade for maintenance and inspection. The structure will sit on a 6" crushed stone
bed,have a 12"crushed stone border and will have a 6" crushed stone cover layer for additional
storage volume.
There are two (2) existing isolated wetlands that exist on the parcel shown as Lot 27 on the proposed
subdivision plans. Although there is no proposed disturbance for these wetlands,the tributary area
shown for EX-4R,the wetland higher on the slope,will have an increase in the amount of flow
tributary to it as shown on the accompanying watershed maps. However,this is a non-jurisdictional
wetland and it is our position that there will be no adverse impact due to the proposed construction
activities.
Using the methods described above,runoff curve numbers and times of concentration were
generated for each watershed for the existing condition to be used for comparison with the
proposed condition described below. A schematic of the mathematical model as well as the results
of the calculations for the 2 year,10 year and 100 year,Type 111,24-hour storm events are included in
this report.
Conclusion:
As can be seen by examining the following sun-unary &performance tables, the proposed
stormwater management system is effective for mitigating the peak flow rates of runoff from the
limit of the watershed analysis for the 2,10&100 year storm events.
4
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Comparison Table
Total Peak Rate of Runoff leaving project area
Description 24 hour Type Existing Proposed
III Condition Condition
Storm Event Peak Rate of Peak Rate of
(year) Runoff Runoff
Q cfs. Q)cfs.
Flow towards 2 (3.1 inch) 5.1 4.6
Clarke Ave. 10 (4.5 inch) 9.7 8.1
Link 132L 100 (6.5 inch) 170 13.3
Flow towards 2 (3.1 inch) 7.6 6.9
the southern 10 (4.5 inch) 16.5 14.6
wetlands 100 (6.5 inch) 31.0 27.3
Link 139L
Flow towards 2 (3.1 inch) 4.8 4.7
the northern 10 (4.5 inch) 11.3 9.3
wetlands 100 (6.5 inch) 22.2 17.5
Link 128L
Total flow 2 (3.1 inch) 12.1 11.2
discharging 10 (4.5 inch) 27.5 23.4
from project 100 (6.5 inch) 52.8 43.8
area
Link 109L
5
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Comparison Table
Total Peak Rate tributary to non-jurisdictional Isolated Wetlands
Description 24 hour Type Existing Proposed
III Condition Condition
Storm Event Peak Rate of Peak Rate of
(year) Runoff Runoff
(Q) cfs. (Q) cfs-
Flow towards 2 (3.1 inch) 0.7 1.2
"B" Series 10 (4.5 inch) 1.7 2.6
Wetlands 100 (6.5 inch) 3.3 5.0
Link 130L
Flow towards 2 (3.1 inch) 0.7 0.7
"C" Series 10(4.5 inch) 1.7 1.7
Wetlands 100 (6.5 inch) 3.5 3.5
Link 141L
6
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Proposed Subsurface Infiltration Area MdroCAD Pond 78P
(40) Cultec Recharger 330XL HD Units-7 rows of 7 units
Top of Stone=125.94 (25.67x58.00')
Top of Chambers=125.44
12" Inv. ln=124.33
Bottom of Chambers=122.90
Bottom of 6" Stone bed=122.40
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of (Qout) cfs.
Overflow Total Peak Water
Storm Event Runoff hi *Ir 11tration
(YR) (Qin) cfs- (Discarded) though Outflow Level (W.L.)ft.
CB rim
2 0.7 0.01 0.0 0.01 124.00
10 1.2 0.01 0.0 0.26 125.56
100 1.9 0.01 0.69 0.70 **127.91
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Comn-dssioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
**This system is designed to accept, store and infiltrate the 2&the 10 year storm events. Should the
system become surcharged,for example,in the 100 year storm, the gutter flow in the proposed
roadway will bypass the proposed catch basins located at the entrance and flow directly to the
existing catch basin located on Clark Avenue Extension. The proposed catch basin located at
station 0+0 Right will act as a secondary outlet and has been modeled as a weir with overflow
adding to the Clark Avenue Extension drainage system.
The peak water level calculated will be lower than the proposed cellar floor grade for the house
located on Lot 12,therefore,okay.
7
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Detention Pond 1 UydroCAD Pond 142P
Top of Berm--136.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=132.0 Rim=136.50
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=136.00 18" Pipe level @ 132.50
12" RCP FES Inv. In=132.90 (From Road A) 4" Orifice @ 132.50
8" Orifice @ 134.00
10" Orifice @ 134.50
12" RCP Iriv.Out=131.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of (Qout) cfs.
Storm Event Runoff In *Infiltration 12" 8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin) cfs. (Discarded) RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.)ft.
p] way
2 2.0 0.01 0.49 0.0 0.50 134.01
10 3.8 0.01 1.70 0.0 1.72 134.68
100 6.6 0.02 4.00 0.0 4.01 135.31
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Commissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
8
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Detention Pond 2 H3�droCAD Pond 143P
Top of Berm=132.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=128.5 Rim=132.50
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=132.00 18" Pipe level @ 128.50
12" RCP FES hiv. hi=133.00 (From Road A) 2.5" Orifice @ 128.50
12" RCP Inv.Out=127.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
(Qout)cfs.
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of
Storm Event Runoff In —�Infiltration 12- 8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin)cfs. (Discarded) RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.)ft.
Svillway
2 2.0 0.02 0.16 0.0 0.18 129.53
10 3.4 0.02 0.21 0.0 0.24 130.28
100 5.5 0.03 0.27 0.0 0.30 131.30
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Conu-nissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
9
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Detention Pond 3 HydroCAD Pond 152P
Top of Berm=118.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=115.0 Rim=118.5
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=118.0 18" Pipe level @ 115.50
12" RCP FES Inv. ln=126.50 (Into Sediment Forebay) 8" Orifice @ 115.50
12" RCP Inv.Out--113.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of (Qout) cfs.
Storm Event Runoff In Itration -12" -8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin) cfs. (Discarded) RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.) ft.
Spillway
2 2.3 0.02 0.79 0.0 0.81 116.06
10 4.0 0.02 1.48 0.0 1.50 116.60
100 6.6 0.02 2.07 0.0 2.10 117.35
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Comn-dssioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
10
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Detention Pond 4 ilydroCAD Pond 144P
Top of Berm=122.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=117.0 Rim=122.5
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=122.0 18" Pipe level @ 117.50
12" RCP FES Inv. In=122.00 (From Road A) 6" Orifice @ 117.50
8" Orifice @ 120.50
12" RCP Inv.Out--114.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
(Qout)cfs.
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of
Storm Event Runoff In *Infiltration 12" 8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin) cfs. (Discarded) RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.)ft.
Sp y
2 3.3 0.01 1.21 0.0 1.22 119.39
10 5.6 0.02 1.54 0.0 1.56 120.42
100 8.8 0.02 2.99 0.0 3.01 121.34
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Commissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
Existing Condition
Watershed Analysis
EX-3
EX-RES 1
Into misting R.noff t'.'rk, .iura
catch basins on Clark wetlands to h
Avenue
EX-2 RunDff towards Isolated EX-4
Weiland W series
EX-1 �-g
W,
�Is existing Total surface RLmff Runalf towards Isolated EX-5
to the north dischargini;from project Weiland"C*series
am
EX-RES 2
Drainage Diagram for existing-submittal
12 Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 8/18/2015
F HydmCAD@9.10 s/nO6611 @20lOHydroCADSoftwareSoIufionsLLC
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/1812015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area CN Description
(sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers)
766,991 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (111 S, 136S, 137S. 138S, 140S)
7,317 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1 42S)
74,137 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C (1 42S, 143S)
24,065 98 Paved parking, HSG C (142S)
872,510 TOTAL AREA
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/nO6611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Soil Listing (all nodes)
Area Soil Subcatchment
(sq-ft) Group Numbers
0 HSG A
0 HSG B
872,510 HSG C 111S, 136S, 137S, 138S, 140S, 142S, 143S
0 HSG D
0 Other
872,510 TOTAL AREA
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 111 S: EX-11 Runoff Area=318,326 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=430' Tc=13.4 min CN=70 Runoff=4.53 efs 20,440 cf
Subcatchment 136S: EX-4 Runoff Area=49,366 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=420' Tc=14.2 min CN=70 Runoff=0.69 cfs 3,170 cf
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2 Runoff Area=127,758 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=475' Tc=l 5.6 min CN=70 Runoff=1.71 cfs 8,203 cf
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3 Runoff Area=221,679 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=470' Tc=l 1.9 min CN=70 Runoff=3.27 cfs 14,234 d
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=560' Tc=12.3 min CN=70 Runoff=0.73 ds 3,202 cf
Subcatchment 1142S: EX-RES I Runoff Area=93,234 sf 45.71% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
FlowLength=300' Tc=5.Omin CN=8 5 Runoff=4.20 cfs 12,995 cf
Subcatchment 143S: EX-RES 2 Runoff Area=12,285 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.39"
Flow Length=105' Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=0.46 cfs 1,424 cf
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow--1 2.10 cfs 57,296 cf
Primary=1 2.10 cfs 57,296 cf
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--4.78 cfs 21,864 cf
Primary--4.78 cfs 21,864 cf
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series Inflow--0.69 ds 3,170 cf
Primary--0.69 cfs 3,170 cf
Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue lnflow=5.09 cfs 21,199 cf
Primary--5.09 cfs 21,199 cf
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south Inflow--7.62 cfs 35,433 cf
Pr'imary=7.62 cfs 35,433 cf
Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series Inflow--0.73 cfs 3,202 cf
Primary=0.73 ds 3,202 cf
Total Runoff Area= 872,510 sf Runoff Volume =63,668 d Average Runoff Depth =0.88"
94.69% Pervious= 826,204sf 5.31%Impervious=46,306 sf
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type U/24-hr 2 yr Rainf.all=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Summary for Subcatchment 111S: EX-1
Runoff 4.53 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 20,440 cf, Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
318,326 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
318,326 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.9 330 0.1500 6.24 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
13.4 430 Total Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
Subcatchment 111 S: EX-1
Hydrograph
------- - - --- --- ------------ ..........
T 24-hir 2
------ yr,
4f q j
Rainfall"3 10"
Runoff Arre.w=31893,2& f
Cf
'Runoff Voclufne�20,44.6
' Runoff Depth=0,77".
w- 1e.nq-th=430'----
2- '
T : 43.4 min
C=
--------- ---
W O�
C 7
0-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 if)ill i2 i3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiffal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Raintafi=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Summary for Subicatichment 136S: EX-4
Runoff 0.69 cfs @ 12.22 hirs, Volume= 3,170 cf, Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
49,366 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
49,366 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.3 220 0.0300 2.79 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
14.2 420 Total Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
Subcatchment 136S: EX-4
Hydrograph
............
0.75-
FN Rnoff i
0.7�
111'24..ht 2.yr
Toe
0.65�
. ............
0-6-
Ralnfall�, 3 10"
0.55-
'Runoff Ahea=49-366-SU
05
V ---I----- --- - - -3 -17
0.45 Run&ff 0 um
----------
0.4-
........ -06pft-O 77'-'.-,.
Runoff
0.35-
-------------------
W------L 0--Ah" 2V
0.3- , : Flo n-q.A- !-4
------ - ---- ------- ..........
0.25-
16=14.2--min
0.
2-
CN
0.15-
-- --- ----- -- ----------- -----------
0.1-
0.05- ,
0- 4
...............
0 1 10 1112 13 14 1*5 1'6 1'7 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 M 36 37 38 39 40
Time (hours)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiftal Type M 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 02010 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Summary for Subcatchment 137S: EX-2
Runoff 1.71 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 8,203 cf, Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
127,758 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
127,758 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (efs)
14.1 100 0.0600 0.12 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.3 90 0.1300 5.80 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.2 285 0.0600 3.94 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
15.6 475 Total
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2
Hydrograph
T y.
PO 111:24 hr 2 yr
' Run' off Area=1 27 758 sf
und VOIUMOF-8.203� bf
Ruhbff�DO th"O 77'
P
Flowle.ric
Othc:4751
C=
1.5.6 min,
CN=70
0 109POPPORMW
i i i � i � i i i 1'61'i'i'i'i'i"14-"1'5"1'6""1'7"'1'819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Time (hours)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiffal Type M 24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.1 0"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8
Summary for Subcatchment 138S: EX-3
Runoff 3.27 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 14,234 cf, Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
221,679 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
221,679 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity. Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
10.7 100 0.1200 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
Oi8 275 0.1300 5.80 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.4 95 0.0500 3.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
11.9 470 Total Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3
Hydrograph
---------- ------------
--- --- yr;
Typei IK24"hr-211
3- '
Rdif1faI103.10"
Runoff Area=221 �679'sf.
s :
u ff-Volum 1413416f]
R no
2- ,
RunoffDd th"0.77"'
P
Flowlerngth-470".
C= min- -
. . . CN=70.
Ot '49 ............... ......
0 1, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiffal Type ///24-hr 2 yr Raintall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCA009.10 s/n06611 @2010 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 9
Summary for Subcatchment 140S: EX-5
Runoff 0.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 3,202 cf, Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
49,862 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
49,862 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
10.0 100 0.1400 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1400 6.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.0 360 0.0360 3.05 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
12.3 560 Total
Subcatchment 140S: EX-5
Hydrograph
0.8
0.75
............
-T
0.7- 1;24-h(2'
------- W.-v yr:
0.65-
..........
------ Rai r1fal 1"-3 :1;011:.,
0.6-
'Rd hoff A69049 B62 f
0.55-
--------------- ------ --5---------
7
OA& RunOff VO16me=3-202: cf -
0,
------ -- ------- --JR
0.4-
0,35,
....... f1OWLehQth:F56W
0.3- 1
...........
0.25- Tc--1. min
0,2
-------- ----------
-7
0.15. CN- &
0.05-
01234567891'01'1 12 6 14 1'5 1'6 1'7 1'8 79 2.0 2.12'2 2'3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiftal Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions ILLC Page 10
Summary for Subcatchment 142S: EX-RES 1
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 4.20 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 12,995 cf, Depth= 1.67"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
61,852 81 113 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
24,065 98 Paved parking, HSG C
7,317 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
93,234 85 Weighted Average
50,613 54.29% Pervious Area
42,621 45.71% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (Cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1000 5.09 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.2 150 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.0 300 Total
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiffal Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8il8/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Subcatchnnent 142S: EX-RES I
Hydrograph
- T -- ---11124- h' 2
4- ype r yr
RainfalIF-3.10"
ffAre'ai=91234.sf
Runo
3-
Runoff Vol
urn --12;995: cf
Run
------ -Off Dilipth"lli-6-71"
2- '
Flowlength-.300"
T 5.0 milm
C=r
---------- ----------------- --------
CN=8&
............ ...........- 4'1 16 1 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 18 i6 i�ii
Time (hours)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittall Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12
Summary for Subicatchment 143S: EX-RES 2
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.46 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,424 cf, Depth= 1.39"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hirs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
12,285 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
8,600 70.00% Pervious Area
3,686 30.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.3 50 0.0400 0.19 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.4 55 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.7 105 Total, Increased to minimum Tc= 5.0 min
Subcatchment 143S: EX-RES 2
Hydrograph
0.5
0.48 --------------
0-46-
_A11'24;h'r__2;yr_
T
0.44- ...... .......
ype
O.Q. ------ ----------- -----
0.4
0.38 ------ -- --------- ------- - -- ----- ------ ---------
0.36.
Run
0.34- offArea02285- f..
0.32
........ ------- Off
0.3 n Vol' 101424 6f!
um, 5 , c
0.28 ...... ...... -- ----- -- - ....... ------
026
t - � -R bfftapth�=1 ,
0,24 ------ un.
0.22
............
0.2 Flow Uh th-.;;;l 05
0.18 - -- --- ---- -- - -- - -- -------- ---------------
0.16 ...... T6 5: 0 rnin,
0.1 .. ....... ......
4
0.12
0.1 ------ - --- -- --- -- - - -- -----------
0.08 - ------
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 1 2 10 111'2 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Time (hours)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type U/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pacie 13
Summary for Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area
Inflow Area 773,282 A 5.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.89" for 2 yr event
Inflow 12.10 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 57,296 cf
Primary 12.10cfs@ 12.18hrs, Volume= 57,296 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area
Hydrograph
------------- ------ ----- - . . .........
FE-1 n—fl m- -1
13 .....MAO W 19 Primry
flow-Ar a=773-,i2&2`s-f
12-' ---- ---1-7-1------ -----
----------
10-
9 -------- .........
7-
............
6-
5- ..........
4- ----------- --- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ -- -----------
3 -- ------ ------—------- --------------
2-
---------------
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 '1'2 1'3 1'4"1"6'1"6''1'7''1"8-1...9"2'0 2"1'2'2...2'3 2425 262728 2930 3132 33 3435 36 3738 3940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 14
Summary for Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Inflow Area 330,611 sf, 1.11% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.79" for 2 yr event
Inflow 4.78 cfs @ 12.21 hirs, Volume= 21,864 cf
Primary 4.78 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 21,864 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hirs
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Hydrograph
10 Primry I
F4 M
fl dw
Area=330Z11 'sf
4-
........... .......-
F 3-
2- '
01
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1314 15 1617 18 19202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@ 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15
Summary for Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B" series
Inflow Area 49,366 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.77" for 2 yr event
Inflow 0.69 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 3,170 cf
Primary 0.69 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 3,170 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetiand "B" series
Hydrograph
FM Infim
0 Pdmary
0.75-
----- ------
.... .... A 9.366JO
0.7- ------ rea:F4
0.65.
0.6�
0.55-
0.5-
...........................
-- --- --- -------- --- --- ------ ----- --- --------
0.45
0.4- -- ----- -- ---- --
0.35�
0.3�
0.25-
0.2� ------— ------ ------ ------
0.15
0.1 -----------
0,06
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 1112 1314 1516 17 18 1 20 212223 2425 2627 2829 30313233 34 35 3637 3839 40
Time (hours)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16
1 Summary for Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue
Inflow Area 220,992 sf, 19.29% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.15" for 2 yr event
Inflow 5.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volurne= 21,199 cf
Primary 5.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 21,199 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue
Hydrograph
113 Primary I
----------------
F&OO ON M
nflow Area=220 992 S
4-
3
-----------
2-
0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232'4'25262728293031323334.�3'.5..3"6�"3"7"��394O
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/nO6611 @2010 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17
Summary for Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Inflow Area 442,671 sf, 9.63% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.96" for 2 yr event
Inflow 7.62 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 35,433 cf
Primary 7.62 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 35,433 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary oufflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hirs, dt= 0.05 hirs
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Hydrograph
F 0 inflow
El Primary
8-
�A -216; 71 sf
-- --------- rela=44
7- '
r -7---- - - 7 7------------------------
6-
0 4-
----- ------
3-
2
----------------------- ..........
1'01'1 1'2131'415161718`19202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18
Summary for Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C" series
Inflow Area 49,862 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.77" for 2 yr event
Inflow 0.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 3,202 cf
Primary 0.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 3,202 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Link 141L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C" series
Hydrograph
. .. ....... ... ---------------- - --- - - ---- ------ ---- ---------------
0.8
113 Primary I
------------
T
'9 T862 ;sf
0.7 n ow,-- re
0.75 A 4
...........
0.65
0.6
............. ------ ------ ----- -- - -
0.55
0.5
0.45
--------- -- ------ --
0.4
0.35
- -- -------- - -----
0.3
..........
0.2
0.2
0.15.
O.V
0.05 77
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121314151617181920212 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 83940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiftal Type ///24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft , Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page I
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 11 IS: EX-I Runoff Area=318,326 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
FlowLength=430' Tc=13.4min CN=70 Runoff=10.85cfs 44,400cf
Subcatchment 1136S: EX-4 Runoff Area=49,366 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
Flow Length=420' Tc=14.2 min CN=70 Runoff=1.65 cfs 6,886 cf
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2 Runoff Area=127,758 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
FlowLength=475' Tc=15.6min CN=70 Runoff=4.10cfs 17,820cf
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3 Runoff Area=221,679 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67�
Flow Length=470' Tc=l 1.9 min CN=70 Runoff=7.90 cfs 30,920 cf
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
Flow Length=560' Tc=12.3 min CN=70 Runoff=1.74 cfs 6,955 cf
Subcatchment 142S: EX-RES 1 Runoff Area=93,234sf 45.71% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.91"
FlowLength=300' Tc=5.Omin CN=85 Runoff=7.30afs22,602cI`
Subeatchment 143S: EX-RES 2 Runoff Area�-12,285 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55"
Flow Length=105' Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=0.84 cfs 2,609 cf
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow--27.50cfs 118,350cf
Primary--27.50cfs 118,350cf
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--11.32cfs 47,008cf
Primary=11.32cfs 47,008cf
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series Inflow--1.65 efs 6,886 cf
Primary=1.65 cfs 6,886 cf
Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue Inflow--9.74 cfs 40,422 cf
Primary=9.74 cfs 40,422 ef
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south Inflow--1 6.51 cfs 71,342 cf
Primary--16.51 cfs 71,342 cf
Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series lnflow=1.74 cfs 6,955 cf
Primary--1.74 cfs 6,955 cf
Total Runoff Area=872,510 sf Runoff Volume=132,190 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.82"
94.69% Pervious=826,204 sf 5.31% Impervious=46,306sf
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type /I/24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 111 S: EX-1 Runoff Area=318,326 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flow Length=430' Tc=l 3.4 min CN=70 Runoff=21.43 cfs 85,075 cf
Subcatchment 136S: EX-4 Runoff Area=49,366 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flow Length=420' Tc=14.2 min CN=70 Runoff=3.26 cfs 13,193 cf
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2 Runoff Area=127,758 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flow Length=475' Tc=l 5.6 min CN=70 Runoff=8.16 cfs 34,144 cf
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3 Runoff Area=221,679 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flow Length=470' Tc=l 1.9 min CN=70 Runoff=1 5.61 cfs 59,245 cf
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flow Length=560' Tc=12.3 min CN=70 Runoff=3.47 cfs 13,326 cf
Subcatchment 142S: EX-RES I Runoff Area=93,234 sf 45.71% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.78"
Flow Length=300' Tc=5.0 min CN=85 Runoff=1 1.77 cfs 37,107 cf
Subcatchment 143S: EX-RES 2 Runoff Area=12,285 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.34"
Flow Length=105' Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=1.43 cfs 4,445 cf
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow--52.76 cfs 220,017 cf
Primary--52.76 cfs 220,017 ef
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--22.23 cis 89,520 cf
Primary=22.23 cis 89,520 cf
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland"B"series Inflow--3.26 cfs 13,193 cf
Primary=3.26 cls 13,193 cf
Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue Inflow--16.95 ds 71,251 Gf
Primary=1 6.95 cfs 71,251 cf
Link 139L: Runoff towards e)dsting wetlands to the south Inflow--30.96 cls 130,497 cf
Primary=30.96 cfs 130,497 cf
Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series lnflow=3.47 cfs 13,326 cf
Primary=3.47 cfs 13,326 cf
Total Runoff Area =872,510 sf Runoff Volume=246,536 ef Average Runoff Depth =3.39"
94.69% Pervious=826,204sf 5.31% Impervious=46,306sf
Proposed Condition
Watershed Analysis
/145 B
ap
MIR
4-0
Drainage Diagram for proposed-SUBMITTAL
Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 8118/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s1n 06611 Q 2010 HyclroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area CN Description
(sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers)
418,696 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (81 S, 111 S. 136S, 137S, 138S, 140S, 143S, 149S,
151S, 155S)
234,394 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C (80S, 81S. 11 IS, 136S. 137S, 138S, 142S,
143S, 144S, 145S, 146S, 147S, 149S, 150S, 151S, 152S, 153S, 154S, 156S)
74,537 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C (138S, 149S, 155S)
4,840 91 Rip Rap, HSG C (1 56S)
4,490 91 Rip rap slope, HSG C (111 S)
94,546 98 Paved parking, HSG C (80S, 81S, 144S, 145S. 146S, 147S, 149S, 150S, 152S,
153S. 154S)
1,125 98 Roofs, HSG C (148S)
2,382 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C (1 36S, 137S)
37,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C (80S, 11 IS, 136S, 137S, 138S, 142S, 143S, 144S,
145S, 146S, 147S, 150S, 151S, 152S, 153S, 154S, 156S)
872,510 TOTAL AREA
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Pipe Listing (all nodes)
Line# Node In-Invert Out-Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Fill
Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ftift) (inches) (inches) (inches)
1 142P 128.68 119.30 268.0 0.0350 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
2 143P 127.50 127.00 16.0 0.0313 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
3 144P 114.50 114.00 13.0 0.0385 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
4 152P 113.50 113.00 10.0 0.0500 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type 1/1 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 8OS: PR-CB O+ORT Runoff Area=4,997 sf 69.68% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.16"
Flow Length=205' Tc=5.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.29 cfs 901 cf
Subcatchment 81 S: PR-CB 0+0t_T Runoff Area=8,849 sf 34.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.39"
Flow.Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=0.33 cfs 1,026 cf
Subcatchment 111 S: EX-1 R Runoff Area=1 90,054 sf 3.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.137"
Flow Length=475' Tc=1 3.6 min CN=72 Runoff=3.15 cfs 13,751 cf
Subcatchment 136S: EX-4111 Runoff Area=70,668 sf 4.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.87"
FlowLength=420' Tc=14.2min CN=72 Runoff=1.15ds 5,113cf
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2r Runoff Area=13,478 sf 11.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.03"
Flow Length=280' Tc=5.0 min Ul Adjusted CN=75 Runoff=0.36 cfs 1,153 ef
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3R Runoff Area=195,386 sf 1.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.82"
FlowLength=325' Tc=15.6min CN=71 Runoff=2.84ds 13,329cf
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5(No Change) Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=560' Tc=1 2.3 min CN=70 Runoff=0.73 cfs 3,202 cf
Subcatchment 142S: PR- POND 2 Runoff Area=14,462 sf 5.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.03"
Flow Length=85' Tc=5.0 min CN=75 Runoff=0.38 efs 1,237 cf
Subcatchment 143S: PR-POND 1 Runoff Area=43,123 sf 9.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.03"
Flow Length=285' Tc=5.0 min Ul Adjusted CN=75 Runoff=1.14 ds 3,690 cf
Subcatchment 144S: PR-CB 1+65 RT Runoff Area=7,902 sf 58.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.91.
Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=0.40 cfs 1,256 cf
Subcatchment 145S: PR-CB 3+50LT Runoff Area=16,522 sf 60.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.99"
Flow Length=315' Tc=5.3 min CN=89 Runoff=0.87 cfs 2,741 cf
Subcatchment 146S: PR-CB 3+50RT Runoff Area=13,314sf 71.65% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.16"
FiowLength=3`i0'- Tc=5.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.77cfs2,402cf
Subcatchment 147S: PR-Cl3 1+65 LT Runoff Area=9,039 sf 64.32% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.99"
Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=89 Runoff=0.48 cfs 1,499 cf
Subcatchment 1488: 3/4 roof area Lot 12 Runoff Area=1,125sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.87"
Tc=5.Omin CN=98 Runoff=0.08cfs269cf
Subcatchment 149S: EX-RES lr Runoff Area=94,840sf 44.94% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
FlowLength=300' Tc=5.Omin CN=85 Runoff=4.27cfs 13,219cf
Subcatchment 150S: PR-CB Road B Runoff Area=31,453 sf 66.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.08"
Flow Length=315' Tc=6.5 min CN=90 Runoff=1.68 cfs 5,442 cf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type I//24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Subcatchment 15IS: PR-POND 3 Runoff Area=25,852 sf 1.45% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.92"
Flow Length=1 75' Tc=5.0 min Ul Adjusted CN=73 Runoff=0.60 cfs 1,981 cf
Subcatchment 152S: PR-CI3 9+5OLT Runoff Area=14,133sf 68.86% Impervious Runoff Depth=2,16"
FlowLength=295' Tc=5.Omin CN=91 Runoff=0.82cfs2,549cf
Subcatchment 153S: PR-CB 10+84 Runoff Area=15,593sf 75.41% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26"
FlowLength=200' Tc=5.Omin CN=92 Runoff=0.93cfs2,931cf
Subcatchment 154S: PR-CB 9+50RT Runoff Area=16,298sf 60.58% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.99"
FlowLength=330' Tc=5.Omin CN=89 Runoff=0.87cfs2,703cf
Subcatchment 155S: EX-RES 211 Runoff Area=13,925sf 26.47% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.33"
FlowLength=105' Tc=5.Omin CN=80 Runoff=0.49cfs 1,538cf
Subcatchment 156S: PR-POND 4 Runoff Area=21,635 sf 6.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.26"
FlowLength=125' Tc=5.Omin CN=79 Runoff=0.72cfs 21275 cf
Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL Peak Elev=124.00' Storage=1,652 cf Inflow--0.69 cfs 2,196 cf
Discarded=0.01 cfs 1,083 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 cf outflow--0.01 Cfs 1,083 cf
Pond 114213: Detention Pond 1 Peak Elev=1 34.01' Storage=2,178 cf Inflow--2.02 ds 6,445 cf
Discarded=0.01 cfs 617 cf Primary--0.49 cfs 5,703 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 cf Oufflow--0.50 cfs 6,320 cf
Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2 Peak Elev=129.53' Storage=3,007 cf I nflow--2.02 ds 6,380 cf
Discarded=0.02 ds 1,313 cf Primary--0.16 ds 5,067 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 cf Outflow--0.18 cfs 6,380 cf
Pond 14413: Detention Pond 4 Peak Elev=1 19.39' Storage=2,415 cf Inflow--3.32 ds 10,459 cf
Discarded=0.01 ds 454 cf Primary--1.21 ds 9,946 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 d Outflow--1.22 ds 10,400 cf
Pond 15213: Detention Pond 3 Peak Elev=1 16.06' Storage=2,701 cf Inflow--2.28 cfs 7,423 cf
Discarded=0.02 ds 1,831 cf Primary--0.79 ds 5,151 cf Secondary--0.00 ds 0 cf Outflow--0.81 cfs 6,983 cf
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow-1 1.18 cfs 68,857 cf
Primary=11.18ds 68,857cf
Link 12BL: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--4.74 cfs 30,302 cf
1 . 1 1 1 1 r, -I e. .. . ..; Primary--4.74 cfs 30,302 cf
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series Inflow--l.15cfs 5,113cf
Primary--l.15cfs 5,113cf
Link 132L: Runoff towards Clark Avenue Drainage System lnflow=4.63 efs 14,372 cf
Primary--4.63 ds 14,372 cf
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south Inflow--6.92 ds 38,555 cf
Primary--6.92 ds 38,555 d
Link 141L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series Inflow--0.73 cfs 3,202 cf
Primary=0.73 cfs 3,202 cf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type 1/1 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Total Runoff Area=872,510 sf Runoff Volume= 84,207cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.16"
81.90% Pervious= 714,596sf 18.10%Impervious 157,914sf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD(9)9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Subcatchiment 8OS: PR-CB O+ORT
Hydrograph
0.3Z
0.3
. . .........
0,28 T-Vbe:: 111,24- t 2
-------- --- -- h�. :
4 1 : Ir � ; -- yr.
0.26,
----- - -----
RairifaIP-3A 0"
0.24-
..........
0.22-
Ru-n-off Ana_6=4 997..sf.
0.2
Unoff
_,,Vol Me= Cf,
R
0 0.18 U 9,01
0.16
0 ---------- -Rundff-Depth
E: 0.14-
:_ .flow
. . . nqth:F205
0.12
iT
0.11
Amin
-C,=
j _61
OM
CN-911
U6
0.04
0.02
Ot
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1213141516171 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfafl=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8
Subcatchment 81 S: PR-CB O+OLT
Hydrograph
0.36
0 34 . .. ...
0.32-
Type:: 111-24-hr 2:yr'...
0.3
--If 11�3_1 0
'--RAin
0.28 --------
0.26-
0.24 Runoff Area=8 8,49 Sf-
'26
Runoff V Wrne�-1 '0 cf;
0.22 ......
0.2
0.18. ------RundffD,'
------------------------- ---------
-----------------------
M 0.16
----------
F1 :W-Le' h= 00'
0.14- 0
2
0.12-
ITC 5 0 min
0.1
0.013, CN=81 ;
0.06 ----------------- -------
0.04
---------- -- ------- -------
0.02
Ot .- ,--'i A Lii.... .......... ........... .................
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type I//24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@ 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9
Subcatchment I I I S: EX-1 R
Hydrograph
3..
Ty,1wi.11-24-- r yr.
3- '
Z
Rainfall-3.10"
Runoff:Ar6a 1900540,
Ru ff Vo1U in"e;=1 31751: cf
2- :no .
Runoff'DeOthFO.'87"
.2
Ffowtength=475":
T 3-.6 Min
c=
CN
_4 4
o44 ........
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type 1/1 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@ 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 10
Subcatchnnent 136S: EX-411
Hydrograph
T pe III: 24-hr 2,yr
Y
Ralhfalli--3.1 0"'
Runoff Aeea=70 �668' sf
Runoff Volun`116=5113 cf.
P -0.87"�
Runoff Dd th-
F16W :Len th-4201
9
rc=1.4.2 min
CN=721
O-LIL i
...1-1-1.1-1.................1".." 1-....... ........................................ ....... .......
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type 24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2r
Hydrograph
0.38
0.36
0.34- -T -AII 24-h-' 2
. ..... ypp: ri yr.,
0.32- ------ - ------
0.3- Rainfal1=1
0.28-
Rurloff Ariaw=l 3 478 sf
0.26m
-- -------- ------- ----------
0.24
Rohoff Volu m' e' =' 1 ,A,51cf
0.22
0.2-
0.18 1 i0311:
Runoff-Pepth,
0.16-
w
F16 Lenrgth:�280'
0.14-
0.12t
-_-------- ----- ------ ------
0.1
- ted CW75.
0.08 U I A dj'-u' 5
0,116
---------- --------- ------ ------
0. 4
0
0.02
0.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
'nm (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12
Subcatchment 138S: EX-311
Hydrograph
............ .......
3-
2
-hr 2;yr.
�T 1:11'24
Rainfall=3.10
Run6ffAre&195386sf
2-
Runoff Vol u met�=�l 39!3291cf:
Run6ff:Depth-0 82"
F16W 'Length=325'.
----------- -------- ------- ------
:T �=19.6 Min,
C
CNI=71 :
0.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Time (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 (No Change)
Hydrograph
0.8.
------- --------- ----------
0.75� a
r
0.7- Ty 111:24-h 2 yr.'
_001
0.66
fa I 1 3 1 O"i
0.6 Rain
ff
0.55-: , uno , Arkr--49 '8�62'Sf
0.5
-32-
...... Ru.noff 0'2i Cf;
0.45- Volume
0.4�
Run flf!QdPth:�OJT'�
E O.W
F1 w eng
0
0.3- L th:0560"
---------- --- ------ ------ ------
7 7 7 7 - ---------------
0.25-
--------- TCZ-12.3-plih
0.2
' CN=70
0.15
0.1 i J
0.05
0 .......................
6-i-i-9, 1011'1,21,314 1,5 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type I//24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14
Subcatichment 142S: PR- POND 2
Hydrograph
0.42
0.4
0.3& 111 T24-hr 2.
yr
0.36
0.34-
Rainfall"M 0"
0.32- ........
0.3-
RunoffAr.66=14462sf
sr �
... .. .....
0.28
0.26
.......... -1-11tin ff 237 cf
0 Vol]6file=l
0.24
0.22
Ilyhoff De.Pth"_t:03`
0.2
0.18
--- -------
dwten.
......... Ff
0.16 ----- gth"85"
0.14
--.Tq�6.0 tnim-
0.12 - -- - - - ......
0.1
..........
0
0.04f 1
0.02
n .............A
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 li 1'6 2b il 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Time (hours)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/1812015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15
Subcatchment 143S: PR-POND 1
Hydrograph
�T pe, 111.24-hr 2 yr
- --------- Y_ .
------- -------- ---- --- ----------
RainfalP=3 10"
Runoff Arda=43'1123; sf
R ff VO!ume�:1690 f
uno c
Runoff'Depth=1 .03"'
F16W Langth=285".
TC=5.0 min
U1 'Adjusted CN=75
01
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAE)89.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16
Subicatchment 144S: PR-CB 1+65 RT
Hydrograph
0.44 ---- - -
0.42 ......
0.4
TVp AIV24-hrZyr
0.38 ------
0.36- ------- ------
0.34- ------ -- --Rainfail -11'0".
0.32-
0.3- ....... . ROnoff-Area;11,002isf
ff v: 4-4-
0.28
256, df
0.26 ' Riuno,
b Ume=1
0.24
0.22 epth=11 ,91
Rmnoff D
----------- ---------
0.2 - -------
9.
ith- 200T
0.18 Flow -en
0.16
0.14
........ _6�5,0 min!
0.1
"on
0.1 ...... .......... CN_QQ,_
00 8; ........ ..
0.06
--------------
0.04 ---- -----
0.02
..................................... .............................................................................
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Time (hours)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed W118/20115
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17
Subcatchment 145S: PR-CB 3+50LT
Hydrograph
J
0.95.
09-
0.85-
t Zyr
0.75-
0.7
0.65.1 Runoff Ar6a=l%522; Sf-
0.6 - -----
-- ---------- - - U[ _Vr fht=2 7,41-cf
F 0.55. , R noff, 0 1 U,
I .......................
0.5.
0.45- Ruhoff 0e04&-1-.F99":
-----------
0.4�
------ F16.W Lr4hath 315'
0.35.
--- T-7------7 7---I-- --------- --
........... -- ----- --- - ---- --
0.3.
..... . min.
0.25
0.2
CN
0.15. .....
0.05.
00'.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 116 111'2 1'3'1'4 1'5"'1"6' 1'7 1'8 1'9 2'0 2'12'2 2'3 2'4 2'5 2'6.2i'2,18-2,19"310 ill i�3�i4 3'6 3`71 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Clark Avenue, Salem MA
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft I Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s1n 06611 (D 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18
Subicatichnnent 146S: PR-CB 3+50RT
Hydrograph
0.85
0+
0.8
----------- ---- ----------------
0.75 -hr 2:yrl.
...... Trype: 111:24
0.7
0.65
0.6 'R ff Ar66=1 3 14-sf
--------- -- ---------- uno .
. ,3
0.65
------- - --- RUnoff Vblum&:2 4 C
0.5
0.45
;R ndff Dept&:2.16"
0.4 U
__3 ------
0.35
F16.w-Lendth:031 O'�
0.
3
0.25 Td�5' 10 Min'
- ------ - ---
0.2
------ ......... ......... _CN=-91-._
0.15. ,
---- --- -- -- - - .......
0.1�
0.05-
4 1...................... .................................................................................................
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10",
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19
Subcatchment 147S: PR-CB 1+65 LT
Hydrograph
P
0.45-. Ty 6: 11124 hr 2 yr
---------- -_3 1:011g-r-
Ra� jnfall
0.47
3
Runoff Area=9 0: 9 sf,
0*35-
...,---- ----------- Runoff V, 1 m0=1 99 cf- -
0,U
0.3-.
Runoff-Depth*1-.99":
0.257
_7---:__:---- - - ---
0.2" Flow Ienqth:i2001�
- ----------- -------------
min.-
T 50 -
0.15
8
0
CN7 9
------ -- --- --
0.()5
0 1 2 lb 1'11'2 1'3 14 1'5 1'6 1'7 1'8 19 20 122232425 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
TIM (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITIFAL Type /11 24-hr 2 yr Raintall=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@ 9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 20
Subcatchnnent 148S: 3/4 roof area Lot 12
Hydrograph
FE—IR.noff)
0.085
0.08 0..
hr'-2 , -r-'- ,
0.075
----------- Y
0.07
. ...... ...... n'fal 1*3 10"
Rai:
0.06
0.06
0.055 R.UnciffArea=O ,
---------- ---------- - -
0.05
u -cf.
Runoff-Vol me=269
0.045
------------ -----
0.04
Run6ff Depth#2 87
0.035
0-03
- ------- - ......... ... --T-c=5.0 min,
0.025
0.02 CN*98-.
0.015
---- -----------........ ------ ------------- ---- --- ------------- -- - ----
FT0.01
0 . . . .
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 i 116 11 li 13 14 1�16 1'7 1'8 1'9 2'0 2'12'2 2'3 2'4 2'5 2'6 2'7 2'8 2'9 3'0 3,13'2 3'3 34 3'5 3'6 3`7 3`8 3,9 40
Tim (hours)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21
Subcatchment 149S: EX-RES 1r
Hydrograph
- -- ----- pe,
-2,
4- T 1U24-hr
Y
yr,
Ralfifall"110".
---------- ------ _RUn6ff.Ar.ew"9_4S4.0 f
S
3- '
U 6ff Vd.
n 16met=11219 df%
Ruh-off Depth"1 .67";
2-
FlOwtilingth#300'
cl=:
:T .5.0 min:
..........
N=85.
0 1.j.-'III...-F'!
..........
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 113 1'4 i6 il '2'j5...2j6,*,2,7 ii i4 ab ii'iiii 34-3"5-36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 066111 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22
Subcatchnnent 150S: PR-CB Road B
Hydrograph
T -hr 2yr
yper 1:1124
Rainfall=3;1,10":
Runoff Area�:31 �453� sf
------ off V016M6:�:5� 2: cf-
Un 1-44
Ruhoff:Dep
�th"2 08"
wl
Flo Ld.ngth=31 5'
Tc=6.5 in
M
CN=90.
r :
................ ....... ........................
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 112 13141516 17181920212223 24252627282930 313233343536 37383940
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@ 9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23
Subcatchment 151S: PR-POND 3
Hydrograph
0.6
Tvn -ht 2:yr,
f-el 111-24
Rainfall-"110".
0.45 Runoff AriDa:i:25 '852Sf
0.4-
_-e : 9�
: R'U IUMV
0.35- .
—0
Runoff �D460th 1;92 --
0.3
eho
0.25 FlowL th=1 75'
0.2--
Tc= min.
0.15
------ U AdJusted.. CN= Z
7
0.1
0.05
.................
............
0 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
I
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type /I/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 24
Subcatchment 152S: PR-CB 9+50LT
Hydrograph
0.85-
I OM
Typer
0.8
yr
...... III 24-fir 2
0.75-
,0.7-
- --- ------
0.66-
;3
'RunOff Ahaa 14 f 3--Sf
0.6
------------
0.55 R.Un _ _-VQ1Uff16=25*�-qf
0.5 Off
0.45
------ .:.. .RUn.dff PeOth-2.16"
0
E: 0.4
'Le
0.35 FlOw niith:�295
0.3
T-C=5.0 ii-IiIiin
0.25 -----------
_-CNF91-
0.2
--------------
0.15
0.
0.05
OL L MOOMW I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1'6 1'4 ib il ii ii i�25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25
Subcatchment 153S: PR-C13 10+84
Hydrograph
------------
10M06i
TYPO 111:24-hr 2 yr.
Radfifall"110"
Runoff'Ar6a"15'593. sf
Rd n'off Vol u m 6=2::931 cf:
Runoff:D60thr-2.26"
.2
-200'
Fl,ow :Le,ngth-
I;TC=5.0 min.
CN=92
Ot . . . . . .
0 1 10 111'2 1'3 14 1'5 1'6 1'7 li li i6 il 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMtTTAL Type I//24-hr 2 yT Rainfafi=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pacie 26
Subcatchment 154S: PR-CB 9+50RT
Hydrograph
0.95.
0.9 ..... ..
0.85,
Type' 111124mht 2 yr
0.8 '
----------------- -------
R-a-i fifa: -I tr"I'l:0 7.
0.75-
O.T - -----
uno . reat
- f
0.6 - -- ----- A ---- 06-�298'$
5
0.6
------ Vol=6=2703T-cf-
: Runoff
F 0.55
0.5 -- --- --
- - Runoff-DeOth'-1.99"
2 0.45
s r ............ --- ---
0.4 ------
Flow-Lren'9th=330"
0.35
0.3 ......... Tc--SvO Mim
0.25
0.2
0.1f . .........................
0.1�
0.05
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type M 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27
Subcatchment 155S: EX-RES 2R
Hydrograph
0.5-
Y
�T
24rhr 2 Yr
------- PPL
0.45-
0.4-. R'Oinfaff"3 10"'
_!-RUnOffArea"13 ' 25:sf-
035
U Wme�:1-538
- -------- ------ R naff V6
0-3- _CU_
.......L_.. Runoff Deijth=1 .33.'.
S 0.25-
-1...... ...
F o Length:�105'.
0.2-
0.15- 0 mim
Td-5.
0.1- CN=001
---- ---------
0.05-
0 ....
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516 171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type H/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n 06611 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 28
Subcatchment 156S: PR-POND 4
Hydrograph
0.8
0.75-
_ 24-h----2'__
T ---- - IIF r �yr
0.7-
y
pej,
0.65-.
--RaInfall"3 1.0"
0.6
unm
_ 'R ...... ff Ar'ea:�21 '63-6d:
0.55
.............
0.5
r .... ...L_1
-Ranoff Vol U1 me=21,175--cf, -
0.45
0.4
..'...Ruqoff 'Qepth.=1 .26'.'.;
i : !
0.35
0.31 _4_:------------- ------- -- --- --
0.25- c= -min;
----------
0.2-
...... CN=79'
_4_ x ------ ......
0.05
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29
Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (infiltration System #1) - Chamber Wizard Field A
Chamber Model =Cultec R-330XL
Effective Size= 47.8"W x 30.0"H => 7.45 sf x 7.001= 52.2 cf
Overall Size= 52.0"W x 30.5"H x 8.501 with 1.50'Overlap
52.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 58.0" C-C
8 Chambers/Row x 7.00' Long = 56.00' + 12.0" End Stone x 2 = 58.00' Base Length
5 Rows x 52.0"Wide + 6.0"Spacing x 4 + 12.0"Side Stone x 2 = 25.67' Base Width
6.0" Base + 30.5" Chamber Height+ 6.0" Cover= 3.54' Field Height
40 Chambers x 52.2 cf= 2,086.3 cf Chamber Storage
5,272.4 cf Field -2,086.3 cf Chambers = 3,186.1 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids 1,274.4 cf Stone Storage
Stone + Chamber Storage 3,360.7 cf= 0.077 af
40 Chambers
195.3 cy Field
118.0 cy Stone
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type I//24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.100
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30
Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (infiltration System #11)
Hydrograph
E Inflm
------ ---- 0 Di�rded
. . ...... -----14-971 ....
N Sewndary
0.75
0.7 1-24.00"'
0.65 -------- Pea' k flev_=;
0.6
'Stora e lt
0.55
g 652 ;cf
0.5 ....... -- ----
0.45 ----- -
0.4 -- ----- ----------- -----------_----
0.35 - --- - - - ---- - ------------ ------
0.3 r----------- -------
- - ----------- ---- ----- - --------- --- ----
0.25 - ------
------------ --------
0 ---- - ------- ------ ------ ------- ----------- -----------
0.1
0.. A
0
0 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type /11 24-hr 2 yr Raintall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 1
Pond 142P: Detention Pond 1
Hydrograph
Ow
2 .. .....
N Discarded
Inflow Area=60,064 :c
I IM Primary
0 S�ndary
2 Peak Elev .134.01
St ra ; e
0 =2,178 'cf
flow
.t'
"M d1d
y
ary
do
0
LISP mard
0- .......... ............ ..........
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Tim (hours)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMirrAL' Type /11 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32
Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2
Hydrograph
0 Inflow
2
0 outflow
0 Discarded
1n' f1ow' Area=44,291,8 Sf E3 Primary
E secondary
2 Peak EleV-129.53
Stora e=3,0 07 id
9
................
0 2 4 6 110 1'2 1'4 116 1'8 iO 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Tim (hours)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type I//24-hr 2 yr Rainfai 10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
Hydri 9.10 s/n 06611 Q 2010 Hydri Software Solutions LLC Page 33
Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4
Hydrograph
UtE-1
0 Discarded
ow Area=67 659 �sf
Infi Ell Primary
N secondary
Peak Elev=l 19-39',
3- '
t
S' drac
ie;=2,415 ;cf
2-
ON in : ii
liji
am
0 OQOMW�16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 M 36 T840
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type H/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34
Pond 152P: Detention Pond 3
Hydrograph
E Inflow
2 M outflow
0 Di�arded
I ndlow, Are: a=57,4305 ..45f I Of Primary
19 Secondary
Peak Elev-1 16.06.
2- '
Storage=2,70.1 cf
0.... '1'0...1'2" '14....1,6....1'8""2'0"2'2" '2'4 '2'6'-'2'8-3'0...3,2, 34 36 38 40
Time (hours)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rqinfal1=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area
Hydrograph
.. ..........
Inflo-
12�
113 Primary I
Ow,
_77- --------- . fl ' Are =�751--',' 980-,-sU._.
10- - --------- - ---------- ------
8- . .........
............
7. '
6 J
----------
5
4 ......
3- ------- ------ ------ -- -- -- -- --- --
2- --------- -- -----
17 '
0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111213141516171819
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITIFAL Type /I/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroGADO 9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 36
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Hydrograph
.... . --------- Fis Inflw
113 Nmary I
F4774
5-
fI6W:: Area=�31 5,936 sf
4- '
-------- -------- ---
F 3- '
--- -- ------ ----------- --------------
0
01234567891'61'i Ii Ii 14 1'5 1'6 1'7 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfaff=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/1812015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC — Pa-ge 37
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B" series
Hydrograph
13 Pftary I
0 :668 f .
n q , =7
fl A rea.,
a
0-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type /fl 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LILC Paae 38
Link 132L: Runoff towards Clark Avenue Drainage System
Hydrograph
FE jnfio�
Lj��nmery
5
n ow: rea= :s
4- '
3� '
.2 ------ ---
2- 1
---- - --- --------
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Time (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Hydrograph
nfim
0 Pri�ry
7-
44--: f
------- f1_o*_Ar'_eA=436 0_�
6--
-----------
----------
4-'
3--
2-'
- ---------
0
0 i i i 101'1' 12 1314 15 1617 18 19202122 2324 11 2 1 5-2 1 6 1.2 1 7'.2,8"2,930 313233 34 3536 HW3"97Z
'nm (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type H/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 40
Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetiand "C" series
Hydrograph
................ ...
ri infim
........ .. .. .. ......
0.8
El Primary
0.75
n owl
0.7-
..............
0.65-
F ........
0.6-
0.5
0.45
0.4
0 .............. ----- -- .......
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.
0.1:
1---------77
0.1 7-i
0.05
C 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 1516 1718 1920 212223 is i5ii iiii i6il ii i3 i4 3��5 i7 3il i9�O
Tim (houm)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type W 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 8OS: PR-C13 O+ORT Runoff Area=4,997 sf 69.68% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.50"
Flow Length=205' Tc=5.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.46 cfs 1,457 cf
Subcatchment 81 S: PR-C13 O+OLT Runoff Area=8,849 sf 34.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55"
r Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=0.61 ds 1,879 cf
Subcatchment I I I S: EX-1 R Runoff Area=190,054sf 3.16% lmpervious Runoff Depth=1.82"
FlowLength=475' Tc=13.6min CN=72 Runoff=7.10ds28,831cf
Subcatchment 136S: EX-4R Runoff Area=70,668 sf 4.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.82"
Flow Length=420' Tc=14.2 min CN=72 Runoff=2.60 cfs 10,720 cf
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2r Runoff Area=13,478 sf 11.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.05"
FlowLength=280' Tc=5.Omin UlAdjustedCN=75 Runoff=0.74cfs2,303cf
Subcatchment 138S: EX-311 Runoff Area=195,386sf 1.98% lmpervious Runoff Depth=1.75"
FlowLength=325' Tc=15.6min CN=71 Runoff=6.59cfs28,435cf
Subcatchment 140S: EX-5 (No Change) Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00%Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
FlowLength=560' Tc=12.3min CN=70 Runoff=1.74cfs 6,955d
Subcatchment 142S: PR- POND 2 Runoff Area=14,462 sf 5.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.05"
Flow Length=85' Tc=5.0 min CN=75 Runoff=0.79 cfs 2,*471 cf
Subcatchment 143S: PR-POND I Runoff Area=43,123 sf 9.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.05"
Flow Length=285' Tc=5.0 min UI Adjusted CNP75 Runoff=2.37 cfs 7,368 cf
Subcatchment 144S: PR-C13 1+65 RT Runoff Area=7,902 sf 58.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.20"
Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=0.67 cfs 2,105 cf
Subcatchment 145S: PR-CB 3+50LT Runoff Area=16,522 sf 60.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=,3.30"
Flow Length=315' Tc=5.3 min CN=89 Runoff=1.42 cfs 4,537 cf
Subcatchment 146S: PR-CB 3+50RT Runoff Area=13,314sf 71.65% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.50"
Flow Length=31 0' Tc=5.Omin CN=91 Runo,,--1.242 cfs 3,881 cf
Subcatchment 147S: PR-CB 1+65 ILT Runoff Area=9,039 sf 64.32% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.30"
Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=89 Runoff=0.79 cfs 2,482 cf
Subeatchment 148S: 3/4 roof area Lot 12 Runoff Area=1,125sf 100.00% Impervious RurtoffDepth=4.26"
Tc=5.Omin CN=98 Runoff=O.11cfs4OOcf
Subcatchment 149S: EX-RES 1r Runoff Area=94,840 sf 44.94% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.91"
Flow Length=300' Tc=5.0 min CN=85 Runoff=7.42 cfs 22,992 cf
Subcatchment 15OS: PR-CB Road B Runoff Area=31,453 sf 66.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.40"
Flow Length=315' Tc=6.5 min CN=90 Runoff=2.70 cfs 8,901 cf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type Iii 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50''
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions ILLC Paoe 2
Subcatchment 151 S: PR-POND 3 Runoff Area=25,852 sf 1.45% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.90"
Flow Length=1 75' Tc=5.0 min Ul Adjusted CN=73 Runoff=1.30 cfs 4,084 cf
Subcatchment 152S: PR-CB 9+50LT Runoff Area=14,133 sf 68.86% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.50"
Flow Length=295' Tc=5.0 min CN=91 Runoff=1.29 cfs 4,120 cf
Subcatchment 153S: PR-C13 10+84 Runoff Area=15,593 sf 75.41% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.60"
FlowLength=200' Tc=5.Omin CN=92 Runoff=1.45 cfs 4,681 cf
Subcatchment 154S: PR-CB 9+5ORT Runoff Area=16,298 sf 60.58% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.30"
FlowLength=330' Tc=5.Omin CN=89 Runoff=1.42cfs4,475cf
Subcatchment 155S: EX-RES 211 Runoff Area=13,925 sf 26.47% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.46"
Flow Length=105' Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.92 efs 2,856 cf
Subcatchment 1156S: PR-POND 4 Runoff Area=21,635 sf 6.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.38"
Flow Length=1 25' Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=1.38 cfs 4,285 cf
Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL Peak Elev=125.56' Storage=3,136 cf Inflow--1.18 cfs 3,735 cf
Discarded=0.01 ds 1,133 cf Secondary--0.00 cis 0 cf Oufflow--0.01 cfs 1,133 cf
Pond 114213: Detention Pond I Pefak Elev=134.68' Storage=3,374 cf lnflow=3.81 cfs 11,955 cf
Discarded=0.01 ds 678 d Primary--1.70 ds 11,148 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 cf Outflow--1.72 cfs 11,826 cf
Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2 Peak Elev=l 30.28' Storage=5,624 cf Inflow=3.42 ds 10,889 cf
Discarded=0.02 ds 1,757 cf Primary--0.21 ds 9,132 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 cf Oufflow=0.24 cfs 10,889 cf
Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4 Peak Elev=l 20.42' Storage=4,677 cf Inflow--5.55 cfs 17,560 cf
Discarded=0.02 ds 521 cf Primary--1.54 cfs 16,979 cf Secondary--0.00 efs 0 cf OuffloVV-1.56 GfS 17,500 d
Pond 152P: Detention Pond 3 Peak Elev=l 16.60' Storage=4,401 cf Inflow--3.99 ds 12,984 cf
Discarded=0.02 cfs 1,940 cf Primary--1.48 cis 10,577 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 cf Outflow--1.50 ds 12,517 cf
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow--23.40 cfs 133,253 ef
Primary--23.40 cfs 133,253 cf
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--9.28 cfs 57,798 cf
Prirriary=9.28 ds 57,798 cf
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series lnflow=2.60 cfs 10,720 cf
Primary=2.60 cis 10,720 cf
Link 132L: Runoff towards Clark Avenue Drainage System Inflow=8.11 cfs 25 295 cf
Primary=8.11 cfs 25:295 cf
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south Inflow--14.60 ds 75,455 cf
Primary=14.60 cfs 75,455 cf
Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C" series Inflow--1.74 cfs 6,955 cf
Primary--1.74 cfs 6,955 cf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type ///24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.507
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Total Runoff Area =872,510sf Runoff Volume= 160,216cf Average Runoff Depth =2.20"
81.90% Pervious =714,596sf 18.10% Impervious 157,914sf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type M 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 4
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 8OS: PR-CB O+ORT Runoff Area=4,997 sf 69.68% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.45"
Flow Length=205' Tc=5.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.69 cfs 2,268 cf
Subcatchment 81 S: PR-Cl3 O+OLT Runoff Area=8,849 sf 34.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.34"
Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=1.03 cfs 3,202 ef
Subcatchiment I 11 S: EX-1 R Runoff Area=190,054sf 3.16% lmpervious Runoff Depth=3.41"
FlowLength=475' Tc=13.6min CN=72 Runoff=13.56cfs5:
Subcatchment 136S: EX-4R Runoff Area=70,668 sf 4.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.41"
Flow Length=420' Tc=14.2 min CN=72 Runoff=4.97 cfs 20,063 cf
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2r Runoff Area=13,478 sf 11.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.71"
Flow Length=280' Tc=5.0 min Ul Adjusted CN=75 Runoff=1.35 cfs 4,169 cf
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3R Runoff Area=195,386sf 1.98% lmpervious Runoff Depth=3.31"
FlowLength=325' Tc=15.6min CN=71 Runoff=12.88cfs53,839cf
Subcatchment 140S: EX-5(No Change) Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flow Length=560' Tc=12.3 min CN=70 Runoff=3.47 cfs 13,326 cf
Subcatchment 142S: PR- POND 2 Runoff Area=14,462 sf 5.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.71"
Flow Length=85' Tc=5.0 min CN=75 Runoff=1.45 cfs 4,474 cf
Subcatchment 143S: PR-POND I Runoff Area=43,123 sf 9.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.71"
Flow Length=285' Tc=5.0 min Ul Adjusted CN=75 Runoff=4.31 ds 13,340 cf
Subcatchment 144S: PR-CB 1+65 RT Runoff Area=7,902 sf 58.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.1 1"
Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=1.05 efs 3,364 cf
Subcatchment 145S: PR-CB 3+50LT Runoff Area=16,522 sf 60.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.22"
Flow Length=315' Tc=5.3 min CN=89 Runoff=2.20 cfs 7,188 cf
Subcatchment 146S: PR-CB 3+50RT Runoff Area=13,314sf 71.65% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.45"
Tc=5.Omin CN=91 Runoii'�1.35cfs 6,044cf
Subcatchment 147S: PR-CB 1+65 LT Runoff Area=9,039 sf 64.32% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.22"
Flow Length=200' Tc=5.0 min CN=89 Runoff=1.22 cfs 3,9
Subcatchment 148S:314 roof area Lot 12 Runoff Area=1,125sf 100.00% Impervious RunoffDepth=6'26"
Tc=5.Omin CN=98 Runoff=0.17cfs587cf
Subcatchment 149S: EX-RES I r Runoff Area=94,840sf 44.94% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.78",
FlowLength=300' Tc=5.0min CN=85 Runoff=11.97efs37,746cf
Subcatchment 150S: PR-CB Road B Runoff Area=31,453 sf 66.98% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.33"
Flow Length=315' Tc=6.5 min CN=90 Runoff=4.14 cfs 13,980 cf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type M 24-hr 100 yr Raintall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/1812015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Subcatchment 151S: PR-POND 3 Runoff Area=25,852 sf 1.45% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.51"
Flow Length=1 75' Tc=5.0 min Ul Adjusted CN=73 Runoff=2.44 cfs 7,557 cf
Subcatchment 152S: PR-CB 9+50LT Runoff Area=14,133 sf 68.86% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.45"
Flow Length=295' Tc=5.0 min CN=91 Runoff=1.96 cfs 6,416 cf
Subcatchment 153S: PR-Cl3 10+84 Runoff Area=15,593 sf 75.41% lmper,.,ious Runoff Depth=5.56"
FlowLength=200' Tc=5.Omin CN=92 Runoff=2.19cfs7,227cf
Subcatchment 154S: PR-CB 9+50RT Runoff Area=16,298 sf 60.58% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.22"
Flow Length=330' Tc=5.0 min CN=89 Runoff=2.20 cfs 7,091 cf
Subcatchment 155S: EX-RES 211 Runoff Area=13,925 sf 26.47% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.24"
Flow Length=105' Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.59 cfs 4,915 cf
Subcatchment 156S: PR-POND 4 Runoff Area=21,635 sf 6.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.13"
Flow Length=125' Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=2.39 cfs 7,445 cf
Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL Peak Elev=1 27.91' Storage=3,361 af Inflow--1.89 ds 6,057 cf
Discarded=0.01 cfs 1,187 cf Secondary--0.69 cfs 2,043 cf Outflow--0.70 cis 3,230 Cf
Pond 142P: Detention Pond I Peak Elev=135.31' Storage=4,767cf Inflow--6.56cfs 20,636 ef
Discarded=0.02 ds 745 cf Primary--4.00 ds 19,760 cf Secondary--0.00 Cfs 0 cf Outnow--4.01 cfs 20,505 cf
Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2 Peak Elev=1 31.30' Storage=9,906 cf Inflow--5.47 cfs 17,706 cf
Discarded=0.03cfs 2,427cf Primary--0.27cfs 15,280 ef Secondary--0.00 cis 0 d Outflow--0.30 cfs 17,707 d
Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4 Peak Elev=1 21.34' Storage=7,390 cf Inflow--8.76 cfs 28,178 cf
Discarded=0.02 cfs 597 cf Primary--2.99 cis 27,520 cf Secondary--0.00 cfs 0 cif Oufflow--3.01 cfs 28,117 ef
Pond 152P: Detention Pond 3 Peak Elev=1 17.35' Storage=7,097 cf Inflow--6.56 cfs 21,537 Cf
Discarded=0.02 ds 2,062 cf Primary--2.07 cfs 18,987 ef Secondary--0.00 ds 0 cf Oufflow--2.10 cfs 21,049 cf
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow--43.75 cfs 238,216 cf
Primary--43.75 cfs 238,216 cf
Link 12BL: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--17.46cfs 101,672cf
Primary=17.46cfs 101,672cf
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series Inflow--4.97 cfs 20,063 cf
Primary--4.97 ds 20,063 d
Link 132L: Runoff towards Clark Avenue Drainage System Inflow--13.33 efs 43,959d
Primary--13.33ds 43,959cf
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south Inflow--27.32 ds 136,545 cf
Primary--27.32 ds 136,545 cf
Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series Inflow--3.47 cis 13,326 cf
Primary--3.47 cfs 13,326 cf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL Type M 24-hr 100 yr Rainhal1=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n 06611 C 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Total Runoff Area=872,510 sf Runoff Volume=282,130 af Average Runoff Depth =3.88"
81.90% Pervious=714,596sf 18.10% Impervious 157,914sf
Operation& Maintenance Plan
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
Clarke Avenue, Salem MA
August 14, 2015
Structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) require periodic maintenance to insure proper
function and efficiency in pollutant removal from stormwater discharges that would otherwise
discharge from the proposed impervious areas untreated. Maintenance schedules found below are
as recommended in the manufacturer's specifications.
The following BMPs shall be utilized for project for pollutant removal from stormwater discharge as
well providing additional groundwater recharge on site by directing the proposed runoff to four (4)
surface detention ponds and one (1) subsurface infiltration area:
a Deep Sump Catch Basins with hoods
0 1,500 Gallon Sediment&Oil Separator
0 Cultec Recharger 330XL Chambers
0 Street Sweeping
a Constructed Stormwater Wetland (Detention Ponds 1, 2,3&4)
Deep Sump Catch Basins with hoods& 1,500 Gallon Sediment&Oil Separator:
• Inspect the units at least four times per year with special consideration given to the end of
foliage and snow removal seasons.
• Inspect the condition of the catch basin hoods installed in the outlet pipes from the catch
basins. If damaged,remove and replace with a new unit.
a Sediments must also be removed four times per year or whenever the depth of deposits is
greater than or equal to one half the depth from the bottom of the invert of the lowest pipe in
the unit. Clanishell buckets and/or vacuum trucks are typically used to remove sediment in
Massachusetts.
• Catch basin cleanings may be taken to a landfill or other facility permitted by MassDEP to
accept solid waste,without any prior approval by MassDEP. However,some landfills
require catch basin cleanings to be tested before they are accepted. For information on all of
the MassDEP requirements pertaining to the disposal of catch basin cleanings go to
www.Mass.g—ov/dep/recycle/laws/cafacts.doc
Cultec Recharger 330XL Chambers:
• Access to the chambers is through the inspection ports to be located at either end of the row
of chambers where shown on the site plan.
• From the surface,through these inspection ports, the sediment may be measured. A stadia
rod may be used to measure the depth of sediment,if any.
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
Salem, MA
August14, 2015
0 Once the depth of sediment is in excess of three (3") inches, the affected Cultec Chambers
shall be excavated and the six (6) inch stone bed beneath them is removed and replaced with
clean stone.
0 Should standing water be present in bottom of system during a routine inspection or more
than twenty-four (24)hours after the end of a rainfall event, it may be as a result of the stone
bed layer being clogged with fine particles. The amount of elapsed time required for the
water to infiltrate completely should be recorded. If after seventy-two (72) hours from the
end of a rainfall event there is still standing water in the bottom of the chambers,excavate
the system and replace the stone bed layer with clean stone as mentioned above.
a We recommend the following schedule for system maintenance
Monft in first year of service:
-Check inlets and outlets for clogging and remove any debris as necessary
-Check for settlement in areas over and surrounding the system
Spring and fall in the second year service:
-Check inlets and outlets for clogging and remove any debris as necessary
-Check for settlement in areas over and surrounding the system
One year after commissioning and every year followinp
-Check inlets and outlets for clogging and remove any debris as necessary
-Inspect the interior of the chambers via inspection ports and measure sediment or
depth of standing water
-Check for settlement in areas over and surrounding the system
-Confirm that no unauthorized modifications have been performed to the site
0 It should be noted that most failures occur in subsurface systems such as these due to
inadequate pre-treatment which leads to clogging. However,with the installation of deep-
sump catch basins with hoods and the Sediment&Oil Separator we do not expect there to be
any adverse impacts to the system due to debris accumulation.
Street Sweeping
Street sweeping should be conducted as needed or once minimum per year in the spring
(March or April).
2
Operation &Maintenance Plan
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Constructed Stormwater Wetlands:
0 Constructed stormwater wetlands require small-scale maintenance at regular intervals to
evaluate the health and composition of the plant species.
0 Carefully observe the stormwater wetland system over time. In the first three years after
construction, inspect the constructed stormwater wetlands twice a year during both the
growing and non-growing seasons.
0 During these inspections,record and map the following information:
The types and distribution of the dominant wetland plants,
The presence and distribution of planted wetland species,
The presence and distribution of invasive wetland species
(invasives must be removed),
Indications that other species are replacing the planted wetland species;
Percentage of standing water that is unvegetated (excluding the deep water cells
which are not suitable for emergent plant growth);
The maximum elevation and the vegetative condition in this zone,if the design
elevation of the normal pool is being maintained for wetlands with extended zones;
Stability of the sideslopes and berms,
Stability of the original depth zones and the micro-topographic features; and
Accumulation of sediment in the forebay and micropool, (remove once every 10 years
if needed)
Survival rate of plantings (dead plantings must be replanted)
3
---..--__._.___n_-_._ __ _ _
_.,_
j
i
� .
. �
. .
s EXI
OILHGROU ��tioF,ygs
HYDROLOGIC S P•
SUMED TO D A E OF V W
, .
. ,
\
>�
:
G
: E R.�y�',
` � . . � �o�BLAETER M
/
o ISD lL,J
,n,
Y r
`. \�
\ \ / No.11613 .
/ U �
/ '
star - �-- __-- •_..,}S-F -._. ��..� -- -` � �
..� � � Rltrw f 10.84 �' � � � _.--- _'-- _-..- __. .--�-•- .-.--� \ ...__ �-. --•- �. � � / � .� .. � � .. � � � � ..
....,3� EX-REJ52 \\ .� � ._ __ � _ ._ - - ..� -, ___ � -- �., \ , , ����soi�) : A L E M M A
\ _.,., -- "ter-22'`X24--_ -•-.__ � � `_' '�-.. '`�. \ /
12,2�3� S.F. � \\ � _ _. - _.._ - �` -- ' _- --,�e- '' _- - -- \ / � ,
� � \�., ", . .� � -- _. _ �. - � _� .�__ f �.. � �� ,�\� \ � TH E WOO D LAN DS :
r- �--
/ ,� \ \ --- � --.- f.., � -- -,� �-,,. -- � -- -� \\ ` \\\\ \ \\,• 0' 30' 60' 120. �I
•� �-- _.._. � _.._. �� .-.� � ��- •���=..�-�-` -.._ \\\ \ \\� \ .; \ SCA • 1" = 60'
/� f � --' �
-- .-,43-- _ _ �. -` -- -- \\\ \\ \ ,\ \ - - LE. DATE. A g st 14, 2 015 .
\ .� u u
� /
/ ( { \ -- �. -- -� .,- � ';,.. ...�.,4�1- - -- -_..�- `��� ..��~ \\� \ \ \ \ . _ ,� LIMIT OF WATERSHED
____ \
- �,, / l ._._ -- ,,. j -� �- � f � ,�- ._,_ -- -:\�� �-`,-\'� \\ �\\ \\\\ \ \ 20.0E ACRES
/ _
t
\\ r J � /
',
� ••. � � 1 � f � � � ,_= -- - - �, \., \;,� ��\� �� .� - .� _ - _.__ _ _ _ }�- -- • � � WILLIAM S
! � i i � .�.. .� \ \\•,� �\� � _ --- -- _ __ - — '• �� � tis C�aZ �` /� r
/ , � � �( l EX-2 �``� \\� ,\�\ \�\\\\� '�,... � --_ --_ ,�. .,... .� � �-,. -�-._ --- ._ ...- '}i-t+- .� •_". f•`/ � � ENGINEERS f PLANNERS r SURVEYORS
I / � \, 27,758 S.F. \`�� ���>>� \\\�\� �. �.. -� _ M" -.., � �.._'w .� ,-�- .,� �. , '
� / ' i \ \\\� � ` ,bm (:N�70 \ \ '�\� ����\�\ \\ `\ ` � �. _... • 189 NIORTH
MAIN STREET
:
� SUITE: 101
� � \ \ , � '` \ TC-1 � \\ ...� � MIDDILETON, MA 01949
—!� .. .,,` \ \ � ...��� �- •.� �- \ \ ,� �.--;,• \ �,`, � � � � � \ ` ,h �' , � \\\ .�— '' '� — -_" '...• PHONIE: (978) 539-8088
.— ___
--_
G � ``� _`y � \ ___ _- — -- � � \� �. -_ ._ ;,4, _. � �� � , 1 I ! !�� 1`1 ��` \ \\� 318,326" S.F.. � .� - --�4--_ � •�- / �' -"•.�- FAx: (978) 539-8200
f3?�. --- ""•" \ � _ ---- ._,_ `�� \�� � l ,, 1�� ~,�� �\\ \ �' "" CN-70.E / .� �_ _ ---- .
_,.._ —. _ _, ._._ ,..,. • �, �--._. _.� �` . . ��` TC • � F ..- .'" � 1�as-.._ + _._- -1. _,,• � www. engineers.co m
\ ws
� ���.. ` .._ ._..,�_ _._ - �� \` � \� ��11 C �� '!�1� \\\ \ \QTc 13 �m I n�, � `'� � -- � .,
_ -
ss��,, � \ �.� '^-142� -�.• -� 1 \ �\\ . \ � � / I ��!� �� \ \\\ \ � . _.-- /, � '� .�-- '�-• �••
._.-- --' --- ` .3s's \ � \ � �! 1 1 , !!� tit` .\ r, ,,,� _. _., :•
�• �
. ; .. - \, ,,>< ,\\ \ �\ •�. --_. _.... � _ � ' ,`� \\ ` ,�:� ��a2-- 1. �,. •• 1) ALL TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES HAVE BEEN SCALED ... .
~ --- �'\ \' ` \ ��� \ \ I '• ` � �1 ' \ \\\\~ .r-=- -" � � � � FROM THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEFINITIVE PLANS BY
l
'�-• .�- -�---.feG ..i �. -;...._... �-, � � �' :. ,� • '• EASTERN LAND SURVEY.
/ \ .�- .-
..
�` � j \ `` -�.., '136--' f '� / 2) THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING BORDERING VEG
. � � � � � � '. � .. � � \ ygA,A .. / � " .. .\ \ ��\ � \� .\ \ `,.�1 T2s � "'' • \ � V � � \ \\` \ �'``, � _ ."`'- _•_,,,,_ .,,,,...,,. ,!'yr. �".. r....- r•,.. _..-• / b�! � ..•, �.
� \ of � . .�;,`� \\ --- .� � \ �\ \ \\ \ �.:,• �, .-- � ,,.�. .• . WETLANDS & ISOLATED WETLANDS HAVE BEEN'
.�,` \ � �-•-. �. � �. � i -- TC '.: LINEATED BY WILLIAMS & SPARAGES.
-� � •` D E
— — — -..
_ _ --- �. .
:--
..,:.
� -` .� •.
\ 9 ,234 S.F.�� � �'\ { ; :� ,, �' \ \ `� �\z, �; \\, .. �` .:
i
f CN 85 '" \
� � •.• Tc 5.0 min � •.. � ! � i / •''•�;•• l ••,'•' 1 \ �•,�` � ) ;� � `\\ � �••''�•
MAP UNIT SYMBOL: 102E -� � � � \ ! ( ':''
• �� � ,�
• ` ) \ I
MAP UNIT NAME: CHATFIELD-HOLLIS-ROCK - •.. . .• .•• .•.• r', � i � t L, .
OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPES � ._._ f� ,_;._ .,,� ...�. ___, / •h �; , \ .•.,.. . . ..... .•,
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B & C/D � � \ \ \ \ \�� \� �'- 1a� ! ,` ,•' TC ''• • �
. -
" . USE "C" IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE \ >, \ \ \ � ?: �.. � �j i �' � �- �,:' � 1 I \ \ � �
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS ` \\ �'. � --- .•_._. � '••.. .•r '.� ,a"� .• . �� S0 ••••• Y N
we '�. \�- ` X 3 „/ �...,.. .�-" ` .� e / �� 1 ; ,.•• J
_ ��� _
- � ._ - � �--` � � =4�_ � :-- - =�-C.N.�S- �.. ---.._ --= _.._ •.� r -- �,.•' ! � � E -4 (ISO�LAi TED), . •• °-
/ -, - X '
.__.. _ - -
� �.. ���- --- �_ `, �\ `�'.;��' - == = =- '.;..-=.; - .,-=-`�' ���� •'• ) { �/ ) `- J Tc=14,x.2 min •'�•
=-- �= /
� \ ' \ '..
� � � � � �
� �, --.. i
�„ \ \ ` � � 1
\�\\ i' � i��/ .--- \ i � } �`, � ' ..--- -•...� �//// / �� �� `,' � � Y \,•` 1 \ ` \ \ �144— --/� / •'
\ / \\\ ' �.. � — \ S ���°'� _-- ��'._-'Ji•�� %� i -- -- __ ..� • •�'�'{•� � I 1 �` �_142 r. -_... ,,,� \ \ � Tc •.• i
,
l _-
__
_ \ _ �
:
.___.
____
__._.
..__ _
--� � ,� �.
_.. ,- � � / { I ! ( -� ,. CNS \ `` _-' ;�` -�.
•
� � � ', 4 ..�.,,�-- --- � � _. _ .-. ___. -- �, i / � ' l 1 I r I T�=12.3, In •••
. � !
� t ,f " / \ >
\ �.
/ �� / ! � •.
\ s / / \ � 1
\ \
.. .. .
•
.\
�. f •. •.•
\ \ \
. .
•_.._ ,
- \
_. ..� \ /
. .
\ \
/ i j / ) 1 f /
�. -'
_-- � - •' .
f
\ � ✓ /
� � ..
�.,,
m _._ =-- "
� \ ( \ \
! � � ::-.-
- 1
. . �
1
` — ! ..
� ��\ \ �
1
\ � \ �s
/ \
�., � / I ,
1 •�
\ I
o
-- : .��� MAP NIT SYMBOL: 102E
E
—•—._•_ MAP MT NAME: CHATFIELD-HOLLIS-ROCK .
: ._,:
- � OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPES
N :
� •
ROLO
YD � H GIC WATERSHED BOUNDARY LINE
.� T
- .
o ISTENT WITH HE
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP• �� USE C IN ORDER TO BE CONS
o ASSUMED T BE „D.' AT GE OF B.V.W. _ PREVIOUSLY APPIROVED PLANS � ..
0 ED
.. � �
N .. � - .. TIME OF CONC TRATION ..............:.C............
MAP UNIT NAME CHATF ELD-HOLLIS-ROCK. I
0
N
a _
L LEX, 3 TO 5 PERCENT SLOP
ES
SOIL UNDARY LINE
� DRO�OGIC SOIL GROUP: B _ BO � � � � .�
; :
OU
HY
__
a FLOW ECTION �
, . .
, .
:
DIR
o
O
, ..
� ..
W
J
� � � �
,. � �. .. '
.� ., .. �.
II
__.__��_,�___._._.�._.._. _.. _.___-_._,_.T,_._____._�,...
. .
���qN OF,ygss9�
PROPOSED COND 10
�:
..
ILS M A
� ti
G
..
N
BLA
CIVIL
0
ISDELL JR �,
� OGIC SOiL GROUP:.
U
. ,
"� ASDSUMOED TO BE D AT EDGE Or" B.V.W. � �No 41610 �Q
N
Y N S Gds � ���
o `Y' � \
o �'•
\ / J / NTE
J � � M � A .: ..:
- ALE
. 2
� - i �� 4
HE WOODLAND
o.. � j ; �
-. - � : S
�— � i T
� 0' 30' 60' 120'
� �
SCALE: 1" = 60' TE. AUGUST 14, 2015 .
/
A
/ - LIMIT OF WATERSHED
D
l �
_ _
/
I
- - S
L
20
0
f
ACRE
,� �
\
' - . _ -
/� r���' \
\\ ���\ `\
� �\ \ > \\ -
/ / ��
_ , _
/ \�`� P0�
/ \� \_ � - I
� 5 50
— ,
�j� h ,ti"
\` \` \ �' , / p,�1h3.0 � GFb � 190,053 S.F. : �::SR
� • ,, , , , � G �o � - �ILLIAMS
,gyp
.\ •• \\\'/%/ —// � � ��s�. � � � � � � � � � � � .. � � � ('end ryz
/ / p g , ?S ���YYV
\• ,� � ,ati. \ PR— ���> > + - � SP��RAGES
— / ENGIINEERS � PLANNERS � SURVEYQRS
_
•''•, ''•, �/ �' \\ � r s . \\ \ _ - _ 189 NORTH MAIN STREET
•
/ � ^�>�
X—RES2r� �.. ' . ` � '° , ��.� 'sus � - '_– – –_---_–__ –\ � � SUITE 101
13,925 S.F. �� � (;►. / C " s°' o t � _ .."' MIDDLETON, MA 01949 f
n � ,9 2 � . ► •. � �.._ � � � i�/ ;y.- _- -`�, _--_��� PH10NE: (978) 539-8088
- �\ �/ � J \ XJ� -� \.�Jl / J - -_ _ _\ \�` � FARC: (978) 539-8200
� � ,Ay - � �. __� � � . www.wsen ineers.com
- --. _ ---
-----
F "'
\ , \ SO � �S ,..
G �S — � �
� sa. .i'` �S-fi2�'
\\ ., �
�Y � .. _
�\ /.
\. . a�
! �_
`L —
1 t
- - - - -
/i� f �,• � , � \ 3 �50•S \ \ � 1 �� _ � �t�-• ;w f.; .� � � J• Vit_,,,��'.-'v y `.:.: ;. T�' -'
G� I � / � . 21. 6.3,5. v �` 1) ALL TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WAVE BEEN SCALED
�/ a, SAI i, •• ' S0. , ^ ` �� \.�._ � y,y�. tom._,
. y A VED DE ITIVE PLANS BY
I� rF� \ \ ���s \ TSS 73
;•, ,f F .�g,, \. l! i i l � \ :� \ \ �. PRO � FIN
.. ,\ , 4 �. ,,. ��, ss FROM THE PR VIOUS Y
� � �• E L P
WOR I � ,`�y:: >• � � PR—POND 1 ��s,ss - �\ •' So'S3o ' � � '.� ~` � EASTERN LAND SURVEY.
.,�: y , 'L � � � \ . — / 43 1 �3 S.F J -\ :� TfEt53.0 �—" $0 � \ 0• — ,`
� ®�• :ti,.� .. ,,. .•Tc, ) J \� ���\ � / `\ � `�-� GFmig 7f=151.0 t�14a.o — r;«t-.. -� 2) THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING BORDERING VEGETATED
�, ' .ate••'' \\�� � .�`'.' ��`\.`` \\ T`'o � 1 C/ ec• \ � ca�,so.o — TFaT5p0 Ggs1k�.Q � WETLANDS & ISOLATED WETLANDS HAVE BEEN
•• `� � '`�\ \ \ .`\ c�. �s � 30' , cFa SO' 1 LINEATED BY WILLIAMS & SPARAGES.
` RETAINING WF1l \ �„, � x DE
PR—CB O+DLT IMPERVIOUS \ . �` '`�dt; .� ��. � . , e, S 3.0 _ ,
WITHBARRIER \ \\ \ \� \ \��\ \ � ,•• •••, � `SD�`S? • 1 �� � � > � •
.. � �� � � I
8,849 S.F. �` \ \\` . \� \.\ \ } ,,, . .r• •S \� 9 fl .� .
.� ''� ..
'
� �o��o EX-2r / ;_ _ � i� I\ � ___`. .,, �' >�� Tc•,'>, P •' o '••. - .
� fyo 13,478 S.F,i � i , �\\ ':•, n �.`��••' Pf�' CB _ � __ '•�,
.9 °sF `–_ � �_ o.� �J J ,29 .fid; PR—GB, 10+84 •.;
Pik D+ORT
G. / •'
...
CB �- ` � � –.. � J ;� -, 15 5093 S F. � '
97 S.F. –
f D / .• , J! ho A h� \ \ / � ��`' o � \ C \ sir ••.
�� /EX—RES1 r ,.• , ,' � � \ cFa,4g.0 \\ - '•�..,
- '�,' 94840 S.F. .••' 1 �. � � J, } so. a� ••.,,•• 'i
_ _
. � � � y
•• ' PR1 4 � � c
I r�-
. MAP UMT SYMBOL: 102E � _ 02 .,• ,•.,.. .,•,• •.••'-� � Ir ► i . � I �� ��'`� �,. \ ' ' soT�'',o o;.r ��
MAP UNIT NAME: CHATFIELD HOLLIS ROCK .. _
ROOF AREA • • ` � ,
OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPES � � + i ti � � �p s, \`_,_,____-- � �" o y + ^\\� � �,�� � ••...... . .. . . ......••.•
HYDROLOGIC SGIL GROUP: B & C/D DIRECTLY J' � ' ' ` ` •' •`rc 'r � r �"' '� � '��6•qo l . / � �>5T7kGCRncEs, � •�,•• TC
. USE "C' IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ,THE INFILTRATED ,��•,'•'�� �' � J' Q ��sgo --�/�� -_ ,•.
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS = `J�J � r� � � � � �.. � ;1 j�,�'455.5 -->�� -- . ,.�.•
1 ,125 S.F. �. -- � � , ,.
..• • • •••
'�` ; 15,$5► \�a� 5' –_ �
X01 � •,• '7 I •••• • •
�. � � .. —
`—! .
• '
\ \ -- `�� /
-
: ..
�� `, \ ;�\� � (ISOLATED) .••
cJ ,
� ��� � – -- ,•' •,_ . ./ 70 668 S.F. .•'
�� ..
' i
.- 19
,� 'l – � �\ \( 5,386 S.F. ,.• •,•' -
-�.__
,�_ ` � '•
T =_ ., , `,, .• Tc ••
`\_ ,,
'' ...� .-. .' t
�_`_ /�,�
.. ..
_ _
.. _ ..
.. _ —
. . ..
_ .� —
_ --_ 5 ( OLATE _
�•
�� .•
_ _ ,
' .•
6 •• ' 49„862 S.F.
• '
I
-
-� ..
•
.-
- ..
,
� '
,
_ . � •. .
. .
- .:
_ . . . .
. . .
..
••. ••..
. . ..
, ' :.
..
' - . .
-
m
a
. ' ,.
� - - ,�,
..'
� r
o ,
.� � � ..
..
In � � � � .. .. .. � .. ..
�. � .. � �.
�.
. . . ..
.. � �.
.. :.
.: ...
tp 1• .
�. _ .
..
.. � : .
.. ..
3
o
.\
.�
•`= - _ :
.\
� ..
N
LEGEND � - �
I •. .
o - - � _.._._• MAP UNIT NAMBOLCHATFEELD—HOLLIS=ROCK
o WATERSHED BOUNDARY LINE � , , --•�•.� OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPES
. SOIL GROUP: B & C/D
OLO
TC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: USDER•'C„ NC ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT th'ITH� THE
•� �
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ............................... � f DGE B. REVIOUSL ROV FLAN
o
SSU D TO BE "D” A
E VW
A 1
ME OF P Y APP ED S
�,
� SOIL BOUNDARY LINE �,T � � .0
� - .
. .
..
a - -
a FLO
W DIRECTION � •� .
� � -' . . -
� . .
O
I
J ,
Q
..
..
d
-—---- __ _ __ __ _ - __- - - - —_- --- _- _ _ - --- - _ � � ,I
.— _—_ _ ._ _. _ ___. . _ L- T ._ _
17
RECEIVED
SERAFINi. DARLING & CORRIENTI, LLP JAN T,,(
. 6
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET DEPT, OF PLANNING
SALEM, 14ASSACHUSETTS 01970 COMMUNITY DFVEL-OPMENT
JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. January 5,2016 TELEPHONE
JOHN E.DARLING 078-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTf FACSIMILE
97a-741-4663
Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner
City of Salem
Department of Planning and Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem,Nlassachusetts 0 1970
Re: Clark Avenue Subdivision
Dear NU.Chiancola:
Below please find the applicant's responses to your letter dated October 28,2015. Foreaseof
reference,we have kept the same format as your letter with our responses directly below each comment.
As we move forward in addressing each of these issues,we look forward to finther discussions
with the Planning Board and staffi
S cerrely
JCC:dl h KC. rrenti
cc: client
October 28, 2015
Joseph C. Correnb
Serafini, Darling &Correrfli, LLP 63
Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
RE: Clark Avenue Subdivision
Dear Mr. Correnti:
In reviewing the application of NSD Reality Trust, I have fagged several issues that are identified
below. I wanted to notify you in advance to enable your client to best prepare for the Board
meeting. As you noted in the application, a Subdivision and Cluster Development (herein
referred to as Chapel Hill) was approved for 25 lots in 2008 and the decision has since
expired (Attachment 1). The Chapel Hill decision is enclosed for your reference as it.is cited
herein.
A. Planning Board Comments
September 17, 2015 Planning Board Meeting
1. The Planning Board requested the developer to make the open space into a feature of
thisdevelopment and place itsuch that it is clearly accessible for community use ratherthan
just for use by the private properties.
Response: A revised plan was presented to the Planning Board at its meeting on
December 17, 2015 showing Open Space#1 and#2 with access through a trail
system to both spaces. These revisions continue to be discussed with the Planning
Board.
October 15, 2015 Planning Board Meeting
1. The Planning Board requested a Landscape plan to better understand the buffer betAfeen
the existing and proposed development.
Response: Landscape Architect Doug Jones presented his plans to the Board at its
December 17, 2015 meeting detailing the entranceway into the subdivision, stieet
landscaping and discussing the trail into the Open Space.
2. The Planning Board requested for you to consider whether there is an aftemative location
for the detention basin proposed on lot 12 since it currently abuts the neighbor.
Response: Alternative locations for the detention basin proposed on Lot 12 have
been considered but the Project Engineer continues to believe that this location
works best and, most importantly, will not adversely impact any abutters.
3. An abutter provided public comment that contends that the existing undeveloped public
way through the project site is land court protected and cannot be altered. Please
provide a response to this comment.
Response: All of the site is registered land, which falls under the jurisdiction of the
Land Court. The existing paper street shown on the land court plans is proposed to be
altetvc� as shown on Me recent Planning Board filing. A petition to alter this land court
paper street will be filed with the Land Court requesting the street be altered to reflect
the proposed plans.
4. During public comment, abutters expressed concern with how project will affect the existing
access to Clark Avenue and existing blind spots. Please note that staff is following up
with the Police Department regarding these concerns. it would be helpful if you would
also comment with mitigation suggestions. Also, Section B(5) of this letter details the
conditions of approval in the Chapel Hill Subdivision approval.
2
Response. 777e applicant has met with City department heads concerning the off site
mitigation and then- is ongoing coordination with the City Engineer concerning line of
site improvements at the existing blind spots, including boulder removal once
permission is obtained from the private property owner The applicant agrees to
perform this work once permission is obtained.
B. DPCD Comments
1. Per Sheet 6 of the plans submitted on August 27, 2015, the maximum height of the
proposed residences is 35 feet. Please note that pursuant to Section 7.2.4(l) of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance, no structure shall exceed two and one-haff (2.5) stories. Should the
Planning Board approve the project, this requirement will be incorporated as a condition of
approval.
Response: It is understood and agreed that the 2.5 story maximum shall be a
condition of approval.
2. The ownership of the Open Space should be clarified as being under the ownership of
the Homeowners Association and granting conservation easements for the residents
of Salem to have access for passive recreational activities.
Response: A Homeowners Association shag be created thr the subdivision and the
required access to the Open Space, in compliance with Zoning Ordinance
requirements, will be built into such documents.
3. Pursuant to Section 7.2.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, at least 20 percent of total tract
area shall be set aside as common land and shall consist of usable open space. Such
common land shall not contain more than fifty (50) percent wetlands or slopelands (herein
defined as land with slopes of 15%or greater), nor shall it include streets, ways and parking
areas.
a. Please identify the benefits of the open space parcels and how residents will
access the open space. It appears that the connection to the Salem
Conservation land is'an important component of the benefit of this open space.
b. It is unclear how to access Open Space No. 2, thus it appears to be
unusable. Please delineate access to the open space and the location of
trailheads if proposed.
c. The maintenance of the trails and Open Space are not currently defined.
d. The plans note that+/-211,858 sq. ft. of open space is provided. Please provide
a breakdown of the net open space to demonstrate that at least 75,054
square feet2 of the open space does not include wetlands, slopelands,
streets,ways or parking areas.
Pursuant to CI of Salem Zoning Ordinance
Section 7.2.5. 20% of the Total Tract Area
750,538 sq ft = 150,108 sq. ft.
50% of the Required Open Space Area 150,108 sq.ft. 75,054 sq. ft.
Response (6-0: Open Space calculations, as well as connections to the abutting
conservation land and between Open Space #1 and #2 have been defineated in a
plan dated December 16, 2015 and submitted to the Planning Board at its December
17, 2015 meeting. See attached Memorandum of Wifflams & Sparages dated
December 30, 2015. Calculations of net open space per the terrns of the Ordinance
will be provided by Me applicant.
e. The project is going to necessitate the clearing of vegetation within the open
space area to accommodate the proposed erosion control elements of the
plan.Will these areas be revegetated?
Response (e): Areas that are cleared w0l be revegitated and such work will be
performed in the least disruptive mannerpossible.
4. The Chapel Hill project included traffic safety3 mitigations measures. Please clarify whether
the following mitigation measures, or afternative mitigation measures are proposed:
a. A crosswalk which will lead from the end of the sidewalk on the
northeasterly side of Clark Avenue to the sidewalk on the southwesterly side
of Clark Avenue (which continues to the intersection with Clark Street).
Response: Agreed.
b. A stop sign at the intersections of Clark Ave. and Clark Ave. Extension,
Clark Ave and Woodlands Avenue.
Response: Agreed.
Pursuant to Section IV(A)(1)(a) of the City of Salem Subdivision Regulations, all streets in the
subdivision shall be designed so that, in the opinion of the Planning Board, they will provided safe
vehicular travel.
4
c. A center line on a portion of existing Clark Avenue to guide motorists through
the bend.
i The striping and signage shall be installed as shown on the'rrraffic
Improvement Plan", dated February 13, 2008, prepared by Eastern Land
Survey Associates.
Response: A new plan produced by the current Project Engineer will be submitted to
the Board for review and will include striping and signagre.
d. Vertical granite curbing along the existing bituminous concrete sidewalk at the
northerly end of Clark Avenue from the end of the existing granite curbing on
Clark Avenue northerly to the intersection of Clark Avenue and Clark Street.
Response: A new plan was submitted to the Board at its December 17 2015 meeting.
e. Repair of the sidewalk as needed.
Response: Agreed.
f. A mirror on the existing utility pole near the bend on the existing section of Clark
Avenue.
Response: It is believed that the mirror is currently installed.
a. Funds to remove the rock at the bend on 1 Clark Avenue and realigning the
fence impeding sight distance on Clark Avenue.
i. Please note that staff suggests the developer remove the rock
rather than providing the City funds.
Response: In lieu of providing funds, the applicant will work with the City
as detailed above to address these site lines.
g. A line of sight easement from 1 Clark Avenue to be granted to the City by the
property owner of I Clark Avenue.
5. Pursuant to Section 7.2.4(2) of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, the cluster shall follow the
natural contours of the terrain and respects the natural features of the site as far as
possible.
a. Please elaborate on how the plan conforms to the existing contours; i.e. would
more cutting and filling be required if lots had to contain 15,000 s.f.?
Response: If the lots were designed to meet the 15,000 square foot lot area, Men there
would be much more extensive cutting and fiffing of the land and vegetation. The
5
realignment of the roadways and lots, as proposed, provides Me least disruptive plan to
the existing grades and vegetation.
6. The length of the street as a dead-end is approximately 1,000 feet from Clark Ave. to the
end of Woodlands Road (cul-de-sac). Pursuant to Section IV(A)(1)(g) of the Subdivision
Regulations, dead-end streets shall not be longer than 500 feet. The Chapel Hill
Decision included a waiver based on the requirement for installation of sprinkler systems
in the dwellings. Please clarify if a waiver is requested.
Response: Yes, the waiver to the 500 foot maximum for dead end sheets is
requested and necessary.
C. City Department Comments
1. Building Commissioner
a. The City of Salem Building Commissioner has expressed concern
regarding the future development of lot 27 as it is predominantly zoned
industrial. Please note that staff understands that Lot 27 cannot be
developed as an industrial lot because its access is from Clark Avenue
through the residentially zoned portion of the lot. This is based on the opinion
of the Assistant City Solicitor, dated October 15, 2007 (Attachment 2).
Response: This filing does not include Lot 27 in its development plans and any
industrial use would not be allowed as pre-configured. Any future plans to develop
the lot would come before Planning at the appropriate time.
2. Fire Department
a. Per the Fire Prevention Officers comments, there is a 8" main providing water
to the project area. The Fire Prevention would like to see a hydraulic
report done by a third party source agreed upon by the Fire Department
defining what is needed for firefight capabilities for the subdivision. The
undefined lot should be taken into consideration in this report with the
maximum water supply requirements considered for potential development
of the property.
i. I will follow up with you after discussing this with the City Engineer to let
you know whether it is necessary.
Response: Water testfrig was conducted on the evening of December 17, 2015 and
the results, which are favorable, are attached hereto.
3. Conservation Commission
a. The Conservation Agent has determ ined that the project will require an order
of conditions form the Conservation Commission and a Stormwater Permit in
accordance with Section 37 of the Salem Ordinances.
6
1. Staff has received a hardcopy of the stormwater report and has
requested New England Civil Engineer Corp to conduct a peer
review of the report. Please submit an electronic copy of the report.
Response: The applicant is currently before the Conservation Commission and public
hearings and a site walk are scheduled.
4. City Engineer
a. Please submit a utility plan for the City Engineer to review.
b. The Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development approved at the
subject location, in 2008 included offsite drainage improvements at the
intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue. The City Engineer has
recommended that the proposed project be subject to the same OfIsite
improvements. The infrastructure improvements are itemized herein.
Response (a-b): Williams and Sparages completed an existing conditions survey
of the existing intersection and confirmed that the City of Salem has completed
extensive roadway reconstruction. A new plan dated December 16, 2015 was
prepared by W&S to address the drainage requirements at this intersection taking
into consideration the existing conditions.
L The applicant shall perform an infiltration and inflow identification and
removal program for the approximate 2,700 linear foot sewer system to
which the proposed subdivision shall discharge sewage, The program
shall be completed and flows removed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy. All
pipes collecting sewage flow and discharging to the Highland Avenue
pump station shall be included in the program.The program shall be
performed in strict compliance with the latest Guidelines for
Infiltration/Inflow Analyses and Sewer System valuation Survey. No
such work shall commence without first meeting with the City Engineer
to review the scope of work. All reports and summaries of work completed
shall be reviewed by the City Engineer prior to the start of the next phase of
work starting (phases are outlined in the Guidelines). It is expected that the
applicant will remove all extraneous infiltration and inflow that is cost
effective to remove up to an amount not to exceed a cost determined by
the City Engineer. The amount of flow removed shall not be less than the
amount of flow to be added by the proposed subdivision.
Response: The applicant is woddng closely with the City Engineer in
determining the necessary steps to perthrm an I& study. It is unknown at this
point the quantity of/&/ into the system since the City has no available studies.
The applicant requests that the compleflon date of the program be after the
issuance of ft first 10 occupancy permits and not "prior to the issuance of any
certificates of occupancy". The applicant is committed to removing all obidous
/&/from the sewer system to which the proposed subdivision shall discharge, as
identified above, however should the amount of flow to be removed not equal
7
the discharge to be added then the applicant should not be required to search
and hunt for leaks that may not exist
ii. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the
intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue as depicted on the plan
entitled "Clark Street Drainage Improvements!% dated "January 9, 2008",
revised February 13, 2008. The drainage improvements shall be
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including temporary
pavement of the trenches, within 30-days of work starting on the
proposed subdivision site. In any event no building permits will be issued
prior to completion of these drainage improvements. Temporary
paving shall remain and be maintained by the applicant, until the proposed
subdivision is determined to be substantially complete by the City
Engineer, at which time the applicant shall provide a full width pavement
replacement program to the following limits from the center of the Clark
Street/Clark Avenue Intersection: 240 feet easterly towards Barnes
Road, and 30 feet westerly towards Highland Avenue.
Response: A drainage improvement plan dated December 16, 2015 was
submitted to the Board at its meeting of December 17, 2015. This plan
addressed fi., ifi. and iv.
iii. The pavement replacement program applied to Clark Street shall consist
of grinding and removing no less than 4 inches of the existing
pavement, from curb to curb, and replacement with 2- inches (or more
if necessary) of binder and 2-inches of top pavement mix approved
by the City Engineer. Final grading of the top mix shall promote stormwater
conveyance to the newly installed and existing drainage facilities on Clark
Street and not cause any issues with existing driveways, The pavement
replacement program must be completed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.
iv. On Clark Avenue from the Clark Street/Clark Avenue intersection southerly
to the existing vertical granite curbing, the applicant has agreed to patch all
deficiencies and overlay with 2-inches of new pavement. This shall occur
when the subdivision is deemed to be substantially complete by the City
Engineer.
V. If deemed necessary, prior to beginning the drainage improvement work the
applicant shall file a Request for Determination of Applicability with the
Salem Conservation Commission and a Notice of Intent.
Response: Agreed.
8
5. Board of Health
a. The Salem Board of Health reviewed the subdivision application at its
regular meeting on October 13, 2015. The Board has voted to issue a list of
conditions of approval (Attachment 3).
Response: The applicant has received, reviewed and accepts the proposed Board of
Health conditions.
5. Police Department
a. The City of Salem Police Department has informed staff that they will provide
traffic and safety recommendations subsequent to a site visit. Staff will be in
contact with you to arrange a site visit.
Response: The applicant has yet to be contacted by Me Salem Police Department, but
is certainly willing and available to meet and discuss safety recommendations.
If you have any questions about these issues, I would be happy to discuss them with you.
Please feel free to contact me in the Department of Planning & Community Development
at(978)619-5685.
Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Attachments
1. Chapel Hill Decision
2. Opinion from the City Solicitor
3. Board of Health List of Conditions
-W,
& WILLIAMS
Memorandum SPARAGES
To: Salem Planning Board
From: Peter M.Blaisdell,Jr.,PA,P.L.S. da S
Date: December30,2015
Subject The Woodlands Subdivision,Salem MA-Open Space 15%Slope Calculation
Project Number: SALE-0026
Dear Members,
Below is a breakdown of the provided area in Open Spaces 1&2 with slopes less than 15%
demonstrating compliance with the 10%minfinum requirement
Description Open Space I Open Space 2
Total Area 168,388 sq.ft 135,070 sq.ft.
Existing wetland area 44,100 sq.& 47,500 sq.ft.
Area outside wetland area 124,288 sq,ft 87,570 sq.ft.
Area with 15%slope or greater 81,000 sq.ft 46,000 sq.ft.
Provided area outside of 43,238 sq.ft. 41,570 sq.ft.
wetlands with less than 15%
slope
Total provided area outside wetlands with less than 15%slope:
43,2391 sq.ft.+41,570±sq.ft,=84,808±sq.ft,-85,00&§9.ft.
Calculate 10%of Parcel Area mquirement for cmparison:
75OM8 sq.ft.(See Definitive Plan)x 0,10=75,054±N.fL RNuired
Conclusion: 85,000±sq.&(Provided) >75,0541:sq.ft.(Required)
Therefore,the project complies with the Requirement
147 BImsom Sb=l
LM M�01902
Tel.(781)581-0464
Fm(791)581-2860
01 NNW MMEMN-Imay, a-MIKINE MMM- -
New England WatLT Spe6iafists
December 18,2015
Meninno Construction
70 Oakville Street
Lynn,MA 01905
Hvdrant Flow Test Repor
Date:December 17.2015
Location: 21 Clark Avenue. Salern,MA
GPM(gagons per m1nate); 850
I MTI(worWng prmum): 1 30
'I Static PSI(static P�Ure)t 1 86
J es Kidney
'n�tew Fngland Water Specialist
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CO".
120 WASHING rON STREET,SUITE 202E,P.O.BOX 3026,SALEM,MA 01970
PH;978.741.7401-FAX:978.741.7402-WWW.ENGINEERINGCORPORATION.00M
November 24, 2015
Ms. Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Office of Planning and
Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970
Re: City of Salem RFQ 0-37—On-Call Civil Engineering Support Services, Task Order No. 29 -
Peer Review Services, Woodlands Subdivision(formerly Chapel Hill Estates), Salem, MA
Dear Amanda:
We are pleased to support the Salem Planning Board with peer review services for the above referenced
project. We understand the project was scheduled to be presented at your upcoming December 3, 2015
meeting but has been continued and the discussion of utilities and stormwater will take place at a
subsequent meeting. We have prepared this project status letter for your use in future meetings.
Proiect Understanding:
• NSD Realty Trust is proposing a development/redevelopment project on Clark Avenue . The
project will involve construction of twenty seven(27)building lots, two (2) lots of open space,
roadway buildings,parking lots, and related site work and utilities.
• The project has been proposed for development/redevelopment in the past as "Chapel Hill
Estates" and was approved but due to delay the approval expired. The plans and developer have
both changed since previously approved project, requiring resubmission.
• The City of Salem OCD will be reviewing the project for compliance with Salem Zoning
Ordinance and Section 7-2 Cluster Residential Development and the Salem Subdivision
Regulations.
• The City of Salem requests an independent peer review of the proposed development plans and
documentation including stormwater management, drainage, and on-site engineering issues
covered by the Environmental Impact Statement including garbage, snow storage, etc..
• Included in the peer review will be consideration of existing and proposed utilities, sewer
separation and infiltration issues.
• Specific documents to be reviewed include a Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision
Review Narrative(not yet reviewed,provided 1]/24/15), Environmental Impact Statement(not
yet reviewed, provided 11/24/15), Stormwater Permit and Stormwater Report(dated August 3 1,
2015), and a set of Design Drawings (10 sheets).
WATER RESOURCES - BURIED INFRASTRUCTURE-PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - LAND DEVELOPMENT
• We understand a notice of intent has not yet been filed and wetland resource area provisions will
be reviewed by the Conservation Commission and are not part of this review.
• We understand the previous project was approved for this site with conditions that would require
drainage improvements offsite on Clark Avenue and a capacity study of the sanitary sewer
system tributary to the pumping station on Highland Avenue(near Walmart), including removal
of all cost-effective, extraneous flows equal to, or greater than the proposed sewer flows from
the Woodlands Subdivision development. We also understand there is a question about
adequacy of fire flows. It is not clear at this time if this project will be subject to the same
conditions and include the same improvements as the previous project, so a review of offsite
utilities serving the project and adjacent areas are not included in the scope of this peer review.
Review Comments:
Submittal Package
o The Woodlands Subdivision design plans, 10 sheets (8/25/15)
o Stormwater Report &Mitigative Drainage Analysis(08/31/15)
o Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision Review Narrative (Not yet provided)
o Environmental Impact Statement(Not yet provided)
o Stormwater Management Permit(City of Salem, Planning Dept.)
o Drainage Alteration Permit(City of Salem, Engineering Dept.)
o Previous Design Plans, Chapel Hill Subdivision, 13 sheets (10/26/07)
o City Engineer Memorandum (12/20/07)
o Previous Planning Board Decision(03/03/08)
Status=Ongoing, Stormwater Management Permit application, Drainage Alteration Permit application,
Environmental Impact Statement, and Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision Review
Narrative to be submitted for review.
Site Development Plans
Lot 27, Utilities
Sheet I of 10, Lot 27
It is not clear what future plans are for Lot 27 (148,000 sf), as no drainage calculations or utility
connections relating to this site are incorporated into this project.
Status= Unresolved, Request Applicant clarify plans for this proposed Lot 27, as they relate to impacts
on the proposed water, sewer, and drainage utilities in the development.
Open Space and Access
Sheets I and 6 olf 10
c Similar to the Chapel Hill subdivision plans, 3+acres of open space is proposed on the north
side of property and public access is provided to Open Space I in three locations with a
constructed access trail.
The Woodlands subdivision plans propose an additional 3+acres of open space on the south side
of the property, but it is not clear how public will access Open Space 2. A single access location
is provided around the back of Lot 27 and no access trail is proposed.
NEW ENGIAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 2 of 7
o Items 9, 11, 12 from previous decision require access to Open Space and trail construction,but
restricts access trail construction to be completed without earthwork or machines, current
proposed access trial involves removal of existing soils, and replacement with 3"minus stone
(Sheet 5 of 10). Proposed construction is within the 100-foot buffer zone of resource area and
downgradient of proposed erosion and sedimentation control barrier(Sheet 6 of 10).
Status=Unresolved, Request clarification if previous requirements are applicable to this project with
respect to access to open space and construction of access trail, and recommend layout be confirmed
with Conservation.
Connection to Existing Utilities
Sheets 4-7 of 10
o Connectivity of City of Salem water and sewer utilities on Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue
Extension is not clear near points of proposed connection to the end of the cul-de-sac.
o City typically requests triple gate valves at points of connection to City water mains.
o Items 13 and 14 from previous decision require improvements and/or studies to identify
improvements to existing sewer and drainage utilities serving and in the vicinity of the
project area, but information about proposed improvements is not included in the
Status=Unresolved, Recommend Applicant revised proposed water connection to include triple gate
valves and coordinate with City Engineering Department regarding capacity and improvements to the
existing drain and sewer utilities.
Proposed Utilities
Sheets 4-7 qf 10
o Proposed water and sewer services are not shown on the plans, and should be included to
demonstrate 10-foot separation.
o Proposed water and sewer main layouts may need to be modified,to provide 10-foot
separation in some areas, in particular in areas between large double catch basin structures.
o City typically requires triple gate valve connections at intersections,no gate valves are
proposed at South Ridge Circle intersection.
o Items 16 and 22 from previous decision require sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D
standards, plans should be revised to show separate fire service connections and valving to
meet this standard and City standards.
Status=Unresolved, Recommend Applicant revise plans to address proposed utility comments as
appropriate.
Proposed Topography and Detention Basins
Sheets 4-7 of 10
Spot grades along tops of forebay and basin embankments (high points between topographic
contours) are referenced in report but not shown on plans,nor are forebay spillway elevations.
Recommend additional elevations be added to plans to facilitate construction.
Status= Ongoing, Recommend Applicant provide additional elevations to plans for constructability.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 3 of 7
Lighting
Item 19 from previous decision describes street lighting requirements. A street lighting plan is
not included in the design drawings.
Status=Unresolved, Request clarification if previous requirements are applicable to this project with
respect to street lighting(and other miscellaneous issues in Items 15 and 16), and revise design plans to
include street lighting and additional inforniation as required.
Irrigation Plan
An irrigation plan is not provided on utility drawings, Applicant to confirm if irrigation is
proposed and provide additional information about irrigation plan piping, connection to City
water main, and backflow prevention and metering.
Status=Ongoing. Applicant to confirm and/or provide additional information.
0 Snow Storage
Plan for snow storage is not clear on plans if applicable.
Status= Ongoing. Applicant to confirm if snow storage is need and will be provided.
Details
Sheets 8, 91 and 10 of 10
• Item 17 from previous decision requires sidewalks with vertical granite curbs, and requires
the sloped granite curb detail be removed from the plans. Plans do not clarify material for
proposed sidewalks, City typically looks for concrete walks. Plans still include sloped
granite curb detail which must be removed.
• Typical fire hydrant detail appears to be missing water main line type on CAD.
• Detail for proposed ADA ramp does not appear to allow for ramp alignment across
intersections and along crosswalks.
• Detail for rip rap embankment includes 4" perforated underdrain, location of underdrain
piping is not shown on plans.
• Foundation underdrain detail shown on Sheet 5, foundation underdrain piping is not shown
on plans.
• Trail detail shown on Sheet 5 requires equipment and excavation, refer to previous comments
about open space trails.
• Numerous street trees (43)proposed along subdivision within grass strip. Grass strip appears
to be approximately 2-fect wide between curb and sidewalk. Tree detail identifies root ball
and size of excavation which do not appear to fit within grass strip. Recommend sidewalk
layout be modified to 3 to 5-foot minimum width per City standards, and/or to include tree
pits to facilitate trees.
• Cul-tec recharger detail provided on Sheet 9. Layout of recharger on Sheet 4 identifies a 4"
outlet pipe at elevation 124.94'. The outlet pipe and piped discharge location is not
identified on the detail or the layout.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 4 of 7
o A single, generic outlet control structure provided for reference without pipe sizes and
elevations. Recommend specific details for outlet control structures be provided for each of
the four basins for constructability.
Status=Unresolved, Recommend Applicant revise plans to address construction detail comments as
appropriate.
Permits and Environmental Impact
Enviromnental Inipact Statement
tatus=Unresolved,Applicant to provide permit application and narrative.
Drainage Alteration Permit (Engineering Dept.)
Project includes a number of fill areas, including proposed cuts of approximately 20-feet and
fills of approximately 16-feet. As a result, the project requires a drainage alteration permit from
Salem Engineering Department.
Status=Unresolved, Applicant to provide permit application and narrative.
; Stormwater Management Permit (Planning Dept.)
tatus=Unresolved, Applicant to provide permit application and narrative for review.
Stormwater and Drainage
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
o Page 3, Catchment Mapping: Pre and Post development drainage catchment area delineation
mapping was not provided for reference as part of the submittal package. Sheets 7 and 8
identify pre and post-contours and a single set of proposed flow arrows,but due to the extent
of contour changes(20 foot cuts an 16 foot fills) it is difficult to visualize the changes to
runoff patterns. It is also not clear if or how this project is influenced by runoff from
adjacent property to the east.
Status=Ongoing, Request Applicant provide pre and post-catchment delineation maps identifying the
limits of all runoff entering or leaving the project area including adjacent land if applicable.
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
• Page I of 20: Required and provided volumes are confusing between table provided on page
1, 2, 9, and 10. Request clarification or explanation of the information provided.
• Page 7, Pond 1: volume table references elevation 13 1, plans appear to show bottom at 132'.
Request clarification.
• Page 9, Pond 1: storage depth listed at 0.75', plans appear to show 132.5'-132'=0.5'.
• Page 9, Pond 2: storage depth listed at 0.50', plans appear to show 128.5'-128.5'=O'.
• Page 10, Pond 4: storage depth listed at 1.0', plans appear to show 117.5'-117=0.5'
• Page 10, CultTec system: volume calculated as open void between 124.94' and 122.4', plans
appear to show stone layer below 122.9' which may reduce volume.
!IL NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 5 of 7
Status=Unresolved, Request clarification on comments listed above and whether reduced volumes if
applicable will impact the mitigative drainage analysis.
Emergency Overflow
Page 4, Pond 1: It is not clear where emergency overflow from pond I spillway will flow,
appears to be opposite direction of planned discharge.
Status=Unresolved, Applicant to clarify.
Long Tenn Pollution Prevention Plan
o Page 1, Paragraph 11 states assumption that the City of Salem will assume full responsibility
of continuing the operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system. Item 8
of previous decision states that a homeowner's association will have several responsibilities
including maintenance of the stormwater management system which is in conflict.
Status=Unresolved, Applicant to clarify who will be responsible for the operations and maintenance
program for all the stromwater BMPs which is quite extensive.
• Operations and Maintenance Plan
• O&M Plan does not appear to include Sediment and Oil Separator.
• O&M Plan does not appear to include sediment forebays and removal of sediment from
forebays and detention basins if applicable.
• Design of detention basins does not appear to provide vehicular access to the forebays and
detention basins for maintenance, which are obstructed by walls or steep slopes in some
places.
• Maintenance of sub-surface infiltrators on page 2 requires the crushed stone and cul-tec
chambers to be removed and replaced once sediment accumulates 3", which would represent
a significant cost if required.
Status—Ongoing, request clarification on O&M plan for all BMPs, access to BMPs to facilitate
maintenance, and responsible party for the operations and maintenance program for all the
stromwater BMPs which is quite extensive.
• Stormwater Checklist:
Page 4 states Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Standards only to the maximum extent
practicable, Page 7 states that Standard 7 is not applicable which appears to be in conflict.
Status=Ongoing, Applicant to clarify.
Pre and Post Runoff- Standard 2 (Page 5)
Pre and post runoff analysis provided for 2, 10, 100 year storm events and calculations
predict ates that pre and post-development runoff rate requirements are met.
Status�Resolved.
0 Groundwater Recharge—Standard 3 (Pages 1, 2, 9, 10)
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 6 of 7
Calculations predict recharge requirements met, however request clarification of required
and provided recharge volume calculations in previous comments.
Status=Unresolved, pending response to previous comments.
Water Quality—Standard 4
TSS removal tables narrative details that pre-treatment is provided prior to infiltration BMPs
and 80% TSS removal provided by BMP trains, (providing maintenance is performed).
Status=Resolved.
If you have any questions or require additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me at any
time on my cell phone at 978-767-5415 or at my Salem office at 978-741-7401.
Sincerely,
William M. Ross, P.E.
Project Manager/Principal Engineer
New England Civil Engineering Corp.
Cc: David Knowlton, City Engineer
Lynn Duncan, Amanda Chiancola, Salem Planning OCDP
Climu/Salem/Wwdlands/1 12420151e�r
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 7 of 7
NEW ENGIAND C1"L ENGINEEIUNG CO".
120 WASHINGFON STREET,SUITE 202E,P.O.BOX 3026,SALEM,MA 01970
PH:978,741.7401-FAX:978.741�7402-WVVW.ENGINEERINGCORPORATION.COM
October 19, 2015
Ms. Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Office of Planning and
Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 0 1970
Re: City of Salem RFQ 0-37—On-Call Civil Engineering Support Services, Task Order No. 29 -
Peer Review Services,Woodlands Subdivision(formerly Chapel Hill Estates), Salem, MA
Dear Amanda:
I greatly appreciated the opportunity to meet with you last week to briefly discuss the opportunity to
provide Peer Review Services on behalf of the City of Salem, in support of the proposed"Woodlands
Subdivision" development on Clark Avenue in Salem, MA. At your invitation, we have prepared this
Task Order—Letter Proposal to provide peer review services of the proposed development.
Proiect Understanding:
• NSD Realty Trust is proposing a development/redevelopment project on Clark Avenue . The
project will involve construction of twenty seven(27)building lots, two (2) lots of open space,
roadway buildings,parking lots, and related site work and utilities.
• The project has been proposed for development/redevelopment in the past as "Chapel Hill
Estates" and was approved but due to delay the approval expired. The plans and developer have
both changed since previously approved project, requiring resubmission.
• The City of Salem OCD will be reviewing the project for compliance with Salem Zoning
Ordinance and Section 7-2 Cluster Residential Development and the Salem Subdivision
Regulations.
• The City of Salem requests an independent peer review of the proposed development plans and
documentation including stormwater management, drainage, and on-site engineering issues
covered by the Environmental Impact Statement including garbage, snow storage, etc..
• Included in the peer review will be consideration of existing and proposed utilities, sewer
separation and infiltration issues, and adequacy of existing milifies to serve the project.
• Specific documents to be reviewed include a Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision
Review Narrative (not yet provided), Environmental Impact Statement(not yet provided),
Stormwater Permit and Stormwater Report(dated August 31, 2015), and a set of Design
Drawings (10 sheets).
WATER RESOURCES - BURIED INFRASTRUCTURE-PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - LAND DEVELOPMENT
• We understand a notice of intent has not yet been filed and wetland resource area provisions will
be reviewed by the Conservation Commission and are not part of this review.
• At this time, we have not reviewed the current development project or previous developme
vroiect designs for this location, and have prepared the following scope of work and budge
under the assumption that the current submission requires peer review as a stand-alone project.
• We understand the previous project was approved for this site with conditions that would require
drainage improvements offisite on Clark Avenue and a capacity study of the sanitary sewer
system tributary to the pumping station on Highland Avenue (near Walmart), including removal
of all cost-effective, extraneous flows equal to, or greater than the proposed sewer flows from
the Woodlands Subdivision development. It is not clear at this time if this project will be subject
to the same conditions and include the same improvements as the previous project, so a review
of these offisite improvements and/or studies are not included in the scope of this peer review.
SCOPE OF WORK:
Task 1) Review existing City of Salem utility plans and information in the vicinity of the proposed
Woodlands Subdivision on Clark Avenue and adjacent streets.
Task 2)Review previous City of Salem development review letter(s) and Planning Board conditions of
approval for previously approved project.
Task 3) Attend meeting with City Engineer to discuss specific City concerns to be addressed in the peer
review, including concerns and conditions from previous City Engineer review.
Task 4) Review and compare/contrast previous development plans with current revised development
plans, including building size and locations,parking and paved surface areas and configurations, grading
and topography, and drainage infrastructure onsite as well as City of Salem infrastructure impacts.
Task 5) Complete site visit to observe the number and location of existing sewer and drainage
structures, existing topography and impervious areas, and existing structures as shown on"Definitive
Plan& Profile, Sheets 4 and 5,by Williams & Sparages Engineering.
Task 6) Review Project Narrative and Environmental Impact Statement(not yet provided) and
Stormwater Report prepared by Williams & Sparages Engineering.
Task 7) Review site development plans prepared by Williams & Sparages Engineering. Review
proposed on-site stormwater management system,pre and post-development runoff calculations, and
stormwater quantity and quality issues. Review calculations for projected sanitary sewer flows,
hydraulic calculations for proposed sanitary sewer design, and layout of proposed water and sanitary
sewer piping.
Task 8) Attend up to one (1) meeting with engineering representatives of Williams & Sparages
Engineering to review the findings of the site walk and review of the documents summarized in Task 6.
NEW ENG AAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 2 of 5
Task 9) Prepare Letter Report summarizing findings of the record search, site walk, document review,
and meeting described in Tasks 1-8 above.
Task 10) Attend up to one(1) meeting with Staff Planner and City Engineer to discuss findings of Letter
Report.
Task 11) Plan for and attend up to one(1) Planning Board public hearings to present findings of peer
review.
Expanded SCOPE OF WORK:
Task 12) If requested by the City of Salem, provide additional engineering services as required to
complete additional site visits, review additional project plans and documents beyond those described
above, and attend additional meetings or public hearings.
PROJECT BUDGET:
Compensation for the Scope of work described in Task I through Task I I shall be made based on
periodic accrual invoices (time and materials), not to exceed the amount of Four Thousand Eight
Hundred Dollars ($4,800.00)without written authorization from the City of Salem. Task 12 will be
completed on an accrual (time and materials)basis at an hourly rate of$88.00 to $160.00.
Written direction from the City of Salem will be required to expand scope of services.
I
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
New England Civil Engineering Corp. will complete the Scope of Services described in Task I through
Task I above within 20 working days following receipt of written authorization to proceed and copies of
all documents to be reviewed as described above.
PAYMENT TERMS:
Periodic invoices will be submitted to the Client and will be based on percentage completion of
individual tasks as described above. Invoices are payable within fourteen(14) days of receipt and
approval by Client.
EXPENSES:
The method for charging expenses, sub-contracted or supplemental services is 1.15 x the actual cost of
the direct expense.
ACCEPTANCE:
This Task Ordered letter proposal, in conjunction with the reference Contract RFQ 0-37 issuance of
Notice to Proceed dated June 3, 2013, will serve as an"Agreement to Professional Services". Please
sign this proposal in the space provided and return one executed copy to my attention at your earliest
convenience to initiate the project. We have provided five execution lines for City of Salem
authorization to proceed but will be happy to revise or append the format of this letter with additional
signature lines at your request.
NFW ENGIAND CrVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 3 of 5
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at any
time on my cell phone at 978-767-5415 or at my Salem office at 978-741-7401. We thank you for the
opportunity to work with the City of Salem and look forward to building on our successful and
rewarding parairrship moving forward.
C!" -�--
William A Ross, P.E.
Project Manager/Principal Engineer
New England Civil Engineering Corp.
f�' NEW ENGIAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 4 of 5
Task Order No. 29 Authorization:
Iv
—4k
Kimberley Dri�scoll Date:
Ma or
ALwto—')
Duncan,AICP Date:
Director of Planning and
,7 Deve'opm t
Stanton Date:
Finance Director
Whitney Haskell Date:
Purchasi g Agent
MElizabeth Rermar Date:
City Solicitor
NEW ENGIAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP.
Page 5 of 5
October 28, 2015
Joseph C. Correnti
Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLP
63 Federal Street
Salem, MA 01970
RE: Clark Avenue Subdivision
Dear Mr. Correnti:
In reviewing the application of INISD Realty Trust, I have flagged several issues that are
identified below. I wanted to notify you in advance to enable your client to best prepare
for the Board meeting. As you noted in the application, a Subdivision and Cluster
Development (herein referred to as Chapel Hill) was approved for 25 lots in 2008 and
the decision has since expired (Attachment 1). The Chapel Hill decision is enclosed for
your reference as it is cited herein.
A. Planning Board Comments
September 17, 2015 Planning Board Meeting
1. The Planning Board requested the developer to make the open space into a feature
of this development and place it such that it is clearly accessible for community use
rather than just for use by the private properties.
October 15, 2015 Planning Board Meeting
1. The Planning Board requested a Landscape plan to better understand the buffer
between the existing and proposed development.
2. The Planning Board requested for you to consider whether there is an alternative
location for the detention basin proposed on lot 12 since it currently abuts the
neighbor.
Page 1 of 6
3. An abutter provided public comment that contends that the existing undeveloped
public way through the project site is land court protected and cannot be altered.
Please provide a response to this comment.
4. During public comment, abutters expressed concern with how project will affect the
existing access to Clark Avenue and existing blind spots. Please note that staff is
following up with the Police Department regarding these concerns. It would be
helpful if you would also comment with mitigation suggestions. Also, Section B(5) of
this letter details the conditions of approval in the Chapel Hill Subdivision approval.
B. DPCID Comments
1. Per Sheet 6 of the plans submitted on August 27, 2015, the maximum height of the
proposed residences is 35 feet. Please note that pursuant to Section 7.2.4(l) of the
Salem Zoning Ordinance, no structure shall exceed two and one-half (2.5) stories.
Should the Planning Board approve the project, this requirement will be incorporated
as a condition of approval.
2. The ownership of the Open Space should be clarified as being under the ownership
of the Homeowners Association and granting conservation easements for the
residents of Salem to have access for passive recreational activities'.
3. Pursuant to Section 7.2.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, at least 20 percent of total
tract area shall be set aside as common land and shall consist of usable open
space. Such common land shall not contain more than fifty (50) percent wetlands or
slopelands (herein defined as land with slopes of 15% or greater), nor shall it include
streets, ways and parking areas.
a. Please identify the benefits of the open space parcels and how residents
will access the open space. It appears that the connection to the Salem
Conservation land is an important component of the benefit of this open
space.
b. It is unclear how to access Open Space No. 2, thus it appears to be
unusable. Please delineate access to the open space and the location of
trailheads if proposed.
c. The maintenance of the trails and Open Space are not currently defined.
d. The plans note that +/- 211,858 sq. ft. of open space is provided. Please
provide a breakdown of the net open space to demonstrate that at least
75,054 square feet2 of the open space does not include wetlands,
slopelands, streets, ways or parking areas.
Pursuant to City of Salem Zoning Ordinance Section 7.2.5.
2 20% of the Total Tract Area 750,538 sq ft= 150,108 sq. ft.
50% of the Required Open Space Area 150,108 sq.ft. = 75,054 sq. ft.
Page 2 of 6
e. The project is going to necessitate the clearing of vegetation within the
open space area to accommodate the proposed erosion control elements
of the plan. Will these areas be revegetated?
4. The Chapel Hill project included traffic safety 3 mitigations measures. Please clarify
whether the following mitigation measures, or alternative mitigation measures are
proposed:
a. A crosswalk which will lead from the end of the sidewalk on the
northeasterly side of Clark Avenue to the sidewalk on the southwesterly
side of Clark Avenue (which continues to the intersection with Clark
Street).
b. A stop sign at the intersections of Clark Ave. and Clark Ave. Extension,
Clark Ave and Woodlands Avenue.
c. A center line on a portion of existing Clark Avenue to guide motorists
through the bend.
i. The striping and signage shall be installed as shown on the "Traffic
Improvement Plan", dated February 13, 2008, prepared by Eastern
Land Survey Associates.
d. Vertical granite curbing along the existing bituminous concrete sidewalk at
the northerly end of Clark Avenue from the end of the existing granite
curbing on Clark Avenue northerly to the intersection of Clark Avenue and
Clark Street.
e. Repair of the sidewalk as needed.
f. A mirror on the existing utility pole near the bend on the existing section of
Clark Avenue.
a. Funds to remove the rock at the bend on I Clark Avenue and realigning
the fence impeding sight distance on Clark Avenue.
i. Please note that staff suggests the developer remove the rock
rather than providing the City funds.
g. A line of sight easement from 1 Clark Avenue to be granted to the City by
the property owner of 1 Clark Avenue.
5. Pursuant to Section 7.2.4(2) of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, the cluster shall follow
the natural contours of the terrain and respects the natural features of the site as far
as possible.
a. Please elaborate on how the plan conforms to the existing contours; i.e.
would more cutting and filling be required if lots had to contain 15,000 s.f.?
6. The length of the street as a dead-end is approximately 1,000 feet from Clark Ave. to
the end of Woodlands Road (cul-de-sac). Pursuant to Section IV(A)(1)(g) of the
Subdivision Regulations, dead-end streets shall not be longer than 500 feet. The
3 Pursuant to Section IV(A)(1)(a) of the City of Salem Subdivision Regulations, all streets in the
subdivision shall be designed so that, in the opinion of the Planning Board, they will provided safe
vehicular travel.
Page 3 of 6
Chapel Hill Decision included a waiver based on the requirement for installation of
sprinkler systems in the dwellings. Please clarify if a waiver is requested.
C. City Department Comments
1. Building Commissioner
a. The City of Salem Building Commissioner has expressed concern
regarding the future development of lot 27 as it is predominantly zoned
industrial. Please note that staff understands that Lot 27 cannot be
developed as.an industrial lot because its access is from Clark Avenue
through the residentially zoned portion of the lot. This is based on the
opinion of the Assistant City Solicitor, dated October 15, 2007 (Attachment
2).
2. Fire Department
a. Per the Fire Prevention Officer's comments, there is a 8" main providing
water to the project area. The Fire Prevention would like to see a
hydraulic report done by a third party source agreed upon by the Fire
Department defining what is needed for firefight capabilities for the
subdivision. The undefined lot should be taken into consideration in this
report with the maximum water supply requirements considered for
potential development of the property.
i. I will follow up with you after discussing this with the City Engineer
to let you know whether it is necessary.
3. Conservation Commission
a. The Conservation Agent has determined that the project will require an
order of conditions form the Conservation Commission and a Stormwater
Permit in accordance with Section 37 of the Salem Ordinances.
i. Staff has received a hardcopy of the stormwater report and has
requested New England Civil Engineer Corp to conduct a peer
review of the report. Please submit an electronic copy of the report.
4. City Engineer
a. Please submit a utility plan for the City Engineer to review.
b. The Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development approved at the
subject location in 2008 included offsite drainage improvements at the
intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue. The City Engineer has
recommended that the proposed project be subject to the same offsite
improvements. The infrastructure improvements are itemized herein.
Page 4 of 6
i. The applicant shall perform an infiltration and inflow identification
and removal program for the approximate 2,700 linear foot sewer
system to which the proposed subdivision shall discharge sewage.
The program shall be completed and flows removed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any
certificates of occupancy. All pipes collecting sewage flow and
discharging to the Highland Avenue pump station shall be included
in the program. The program shall be performed in strict
compliance with the latest Guidelines for Infiltration/Inflow Analyses
and Sewer System Evaluation Survey. No such work shall
commence without first meeting with the City Engineer to review
the scope of work. All reports and summaries of work completed
shall be reviewed by the City Engineer prior to the start of the next
phase of work starting (phases are outlined in the Guidelines). It is
expected that the applicant will remove all extraneous infiltration
and inflow that is cost effective to remove up to an amount not to
exceed a cost determined by the City Engineer. The amount of
flow removed shall not be less than the amount of flow to be added
by the proposed subdivision.
ii. The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the
intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue as depicted on the
plan entitled "Clark Street Drainage Improvements", dated "January
9, 2008", revised February 13, 2008. The drainage improvements
shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including
temporary pavement of the trenches, within 30-days of work
starting on the proposed subdivision site. In any event, no building
permits will be issued prior to completion of these drainage
improvements. Temporary paving shall remain and be maintained
by the applicant, until the proposed subdivision is determined to be
substantially complete by the City Engineer, at which time the
applicant shall provide a full width pavement replacement program
to the following limits from the center of the Clark Street/Clark
Avenue Intersection: 240 feet easterly towards Barnes Road, and
30 feet westerly towards Highland Avenue.
iii. The pavement replacement program applied to Clark Street shall
consist of grinding and removing no less than 4 inches of the
existing pavement, from curb to curb, and replacement with 2-
inches (or more if necessary) of binder and 2-inches of top
pavement mix approved by the City Engineer. Final grading of the
top mix shall promote stormwater conveyance to the newly installed
and existing drainage facilities on Clark Street and not cause any
issues with existing driveways. The pavement replacement
program must be completed and approved by the City Engineer
prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.
Page 5 of 6
iv. On Clark Avenue from the Clark Street/Clark Avenue intersection
southerly to the existing vertical granite curbing, the applicant has
agreed to patch all deficiencies and overlay with 2-inches of new
pavement. This shall occur when the subdivision is deemed to be
substantially complete by the City Engineer.
v. If deemed necessary, prior to beginning the drainage improvement
work the applicant shall file a Request for Determination of
Applicability with the Salem Conservation Commission and a Notice
of Intent.
5. Board of Health
a. The Salem Board of Health reviewed the subdivision application at its
regular meeting on October 13, 2015. The Board has voted to issue a list
of conditions of approval (Attachment 3).
6. Police Department
a. The City of Salem Police Department has informed staff that they will
provide traffic and safety recommendations subsequent to a site visit. Staff
will be in contact with you to arrange a site visit.
If you have any questions about these issues, I would be happy to discuss them with
you. Please feel free to contact me in the Department of Planning & Community
Development at (978) 619-5685.
Sincerely,
-'Lu a,
Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Attachments
1. Chapel Hill Decision
2. Opinion from the City Solicitor
3. Board of Health List of Conditions
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF SALEM
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
93 WASFHNGTON STREET+SALEM,MASSAC�SETTS 01970
TEL:978-745-9595*F� 978-744-1279
KjNm�DRISCOLL Euz�=RENN�,EsQ. J�P�S�,ESQ-
MAYOR CITY SOLIOTOR ASST.CITY SOUCITOR
To: Elizabeth Rennard, city solicitor
From: Jerald Parisella, assistant city solicitor
RE: Chapel Hill subdivision
October 15, 2007
You have requested an opinion regarding the proposed subdivision located at "Chapel
Hill."The issues you would like reviewed are: (1)Whether access may be denied to a
portion of the land in question because it is zoned industrial and access would have to be
gained through a residential zone, (2)if access is denied is this a taking, and (3)whether
upcoming meetings have to be advertised.
The facts as I understand them are that the Planning Board is reviewing a proposed 26-lot
single family subdivision near Clark Avenue, also known as Chapel Hill. The homes will
be constructed in the R-1 district but are being proposed as a cluster development.
Adjacent to the R-I District is land zoned Industrial. It has been represented that access to
the Industrial land is only available via the roadways proposed in the subdivision,and
that said roadways will be located in the residential district, as shown on Definitive
Subdivision Plan Chapel Hill,prepared by Eastern Land Survey Assoc. Inc., dated June
28, 2006 as revised on June 11, 2007 and August 20, 2007.
The Planning Board has had several meetings regarding this subdivision and advertised
its first meeting as required by M.G.L. c. 41 section 8 IT.
The caselaw makes it clear that access to a use is an extension of such use. Beale v.
Planniniz Board of Rockland,423 Mass. 690 (1996),holding that access to a retail
shopping center was a retail use and not permitted in a district zoned industrial.
Chelmsford v. Bvme 6 Mass.App.Ct. 848 (1978), injunction barring use of residential
land in Chelmsford Zr access to industrial land in Lowell. See also Building Inspector of
Dennis v. Harne , 2 Mass.App.Ct. 584 (1974), use of a portion of defendant's land that
lies in residential zone to access commercial use not permitted by town's bylaw.
It appears that this limitation applies to private ways or ways not accepted as public
streets.
I was not able to find a case squarely on point,but the SIC seemed to state that zoning
restrictions should not apply to publicly accepted ways.
"Although a municipality is subject to its own zoning regulations ... we know of no
authority for the proposition that a public way, laid out by municipal action,pursuant to
statute, may be used only for purposes which are permitted in the zoning district in which
the public way lies. The adoption of such a rule at this time would be both surprising and
disruptive throughout the Commonwealth. If the issue were before us squarely,we would
rule that the use of a public way is not restricted by local zoning provisions."Harrison v.
Textron, 367 Mass. 540 (1975).
A way does not become a public way unless it has become public by one of three ways:
1. A laying out by public authority in the manner prescribed by statute (see M.G.L.
c. 82);
2. By prescription;
3. prior to 1846 by dedication and acceptance. Fenn v. Town of Middleboroug 7
Mass.App.Ct. 80 (1979).
Approval by the Planning Board of a subdivision does not mean that the ways in the
subdivision become public ways.
The principal purpose of the Subdivision Control Law is to protect the
health and welfare of the community 'by regulating the laying out and
construction of ways in subdivisions providing access to the several lots
therein,but which have not become public ways, and ensuring sanitary
conditions in subdivisions and in proper cases parks and open areas'
(emphasis supplied). s 8 1 M. 'Me Subdivision Control Law may thus be
exercised only when new ways required to serve the subdivided lots
themselves are required. The suggestion that the planning board's approval
of the way under the statute vests some rights to use it in the plaintiffs
whose lot was not within the subdivision finds no support in the statute,
whose principal object is to ensure sufficient access to the lots within the
subdivision and to provide them with municipal services. Such subdivision
plans ... indicate no more than that the ways shown adequately ensure that
the lots within the subdivision are sufficiently accessible so that they can
be provided with municipal and other services. The Subdivision Control
Law provides no authorization or implication that such approval vests any
interest in these ways in the public. Dolan v. Board of Appeals of
Chatham, 359 Mass. 699(1971).
It should be noted that the public ways should also be adequate to ensure safe and proper
access. As noted in M.G.L. c. 41 sec. 8 IM, the purposes of the subdivision control law
include protecting the safety, convenience and welfare of the inhabitants of the city and
ensuring that access and ways in the subdivision will be safe and convenient for travel
and lessen congestion in the ways of the subdivision and adjacent public ways. The
Planning Board also can ensure proper coordination with the proposed ways in the
subdivision with other public ways in the city and in neighboring subdivisions. See Beale
v. Planning Board of Rockland.
Because the plan proposed utilizes a way in the residential district to gain access to a lot
in the industrial district,it is my opinion that the Planning Board may deny the plan as
presented. I also believe that the Board can take into account the quality of access in and
around the subdivision in determining if the plan should be approved.
The second issue is whether a taking would occur if access to the Industrial-zoned land
was denied. It has been represented to me that the only access to the industrial land
(shown as lot 27 on Definitive Subdivision Plan Chapel Hill,by Eastern Land Surveyors,
dated June 28, 2006 and revised on June 11, 2007 and August 20, 2007)is via the ways
shown on the plan. The courts in Massachusetts have generally divided takings claims
into"facial challenges"or"as applied"challenges. In a facial challenge the landowner
must assert that the regulation leaves no reasonable use of the property. In an as applied
challenge, the landowner must assert that a zoning provision, though valid generally, is
unconstitutional as applied to a particular parcel when due to the peculiarities of the
parcel, application of the by-law is unnecessary to accomplish the public purpose for
which the ordinance was intended. First the courts will determine if the regulation serves
a valid public purpose. If it does,then the court will look to see if the regulation deprives
the plaintiff s land of all practical value to them or to anyone acquiring it, leaving them
only with the burden of paying taxes on it. See Brobrowski, Handbook of Massachusetts
Land Use and Planning section 2.05(c), citations omitted.
hi Beale v. Planning Board of Rockland,the SJC did note that in "the absence of an
invalid purpose, courts have upheld restrictions on use in one zone even when the
restrictions make access to property in another zone a physical impossibility."
Turning to the issue of advertising(or re-advertising) the Planning Board meeting,it does
not appear that this is necessary. Before approving a subdivision plan,the Planning Board
must follow the requirements of M.G.L. c. 41 sec. 8 IT, which requires a public hearing.
Notice of the public hearing must be given by advertisement in a newspaper of general
circulation in the city and mailing a copy of the advertisement to abutters. I have been
informed that this was done at the initial hearing for this project in October of 2006 and
that the matter has been continued on various occasions as a result of various cormnems
from city boards and officials and because a zoning change was required. As long as each
meeting was continued with notice of the upcoming meeting(and the meetings are posted
pursuant to the Open Meeting law), then I believe the notice requirements have been met.
CITY OF SALEM5 MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF HEALTH
120 WASHINGTON STREET,4�FLOOR
prevent.promote.protect.
TEL. (978) 741-1800 FAx(978) 745-0343
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL IramdinQsa1em.co
MAYOR LARRY RAMDIN,RS/REI-fS,CHO,CP-FS
HEALTH AGENT
October 15, 2015
Serafini, Darling and Correnti, LLP
c/o Attorney CorTenti
thru Amanda Chinacola, Salem Planning Department
RE: Clark Avenue Assessor map 6,lots 7, 8, 9 . Salem MA
The Salem Board of Health has reviewed your subdivision application and at its regular meeting held on October 13,
2105, also considered your presentation to the Board. The Board has voted to issue a list of conditions that must be
met and the list is attached. A copy of this list will be provided to the City of Salem Planning Board.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at 978-741-1800
Yours Very Truly 'Ri oeld of NO
Larry A. Ramdin, MPH, MA, REHS, CHO, CP-FS, HHS
Health Agent '90/e""
BOARDOF HEALTH LIST OF CONDITIONS
1. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name,
address, and telephone number of the project(site)manager who will be on site and directly responsible
for the construction of the project.
2. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, no structure
shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible for the site certifies that soil and
ground water on the entire site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use.
3. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer.
4. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior to construction,
demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent
5. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
6. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control and street sweeping which
I will occur during construction.
7. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and removal of debris,
vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material generated during demolition and/or construction.
8. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting.
9. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations, including but not limited to
refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the
ambient levels measured at the property line.
10. The developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill-material needed for the
proj ect.
11. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in an
environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health.
12. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and
confirmation that above conditions have been met.
13. The developer shall install grease traps, to contain grease in gray water,prior to it entering the city sewer
system in developments with 10 or more units and in compliance with the requirements of the City
Engineer
14. Salem sits in a Radon Zone I and the risk of radon entering buildings is extremely. Therefore, the
installation of radon mitigation systems are required.
15. The final construction must comply with all requirements of the Massachusetts State Sanitary code.
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS
DATE: 09/28/2015
TO: ) BUILDING COMMISSIONER ( ) CONSERVATION COMM
)YITYENGINEER ( ) FIRE PREVENTION
(OrBOARD OF HEALTH ) SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) DISABILITIES COMMISSION ) POLICE DEPARTMENT
( ) DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SERVICES
Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review
this application relative to the Zoning Ordinance and/or to the Subdivision Regulations and MGL
Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to Amanda
Chiancola, she can be reached by phone at 978-619-5691 or email at achiancola(&-salen-Lcom.
Preliminary Subdivision Plan
Definitive Subdivision Plan
Waiver from Frontage
Drive-Through Special Permit
Cluster Development
Planned Unit Development
Site Plan Review
Business Park Development District
Wireless Communication Facilities Special Pennit
North River Canal Comidor Mixed Use District Special Pennit
Flood Hazard District Special Permit
APPLICANT: Serafini,Darling and Correnti, LLP, C/o Attorney Correnti
PROJECT NAME &ADDRESS: Clark Avenue,Assessors Map 6,Lots 7, 8, and 9.
CONTACT PERSON: Amanda Cliiancola
COMMENTS DUE: Requested by 10/15/2015 for hearing that night.
CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explami on reverse side)
NEED MORE INFORMATION(Explain on reverse side)
CANNOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side)
(,?(OMMENTS INCLUDED
AC-&TA
Reviewer's Signature Title
- PlIoN1:978.619.�08� F;�x978,740�0404
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS lu
BOARD OF HEALTH-
120 WASHINGTON STREET,4'�FLOOR P Ith
Prevent.Prornate.Protect,
TEL. (978) 741-1800 FAx(978) 745-0343
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL Iramdin@salem.com LARRY RAMDIN,RS/REHS,CHO,CP-FS
MAYOR HEALTH AGENT
October 15, 2015
Serafini, Darling and Correnti, LLP
c/o Attorney Correnti
thru Amanda Chinacola, Salem Planning Department
RE: Clark Avenue Assessor map 6, lots 7, 8, 9 , Salem MA
The Salem Board of Health has reviewed your subdivision application and at its regular meeting held on October 13,
2105, also considered your presentation to the Board. The Board has voted to issue a list of conditions that must be
met and the list is attached. A copy of this list will be provided to the City of Salem Planning Board.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at 978-741-1800
Yours Very Truly 2,16 of He
Larry A. Ramdin, MPH, MA, REHS, CHO, CP-FS, HHS j
Health Agent tA�'
4
BOARDOF HEALTH LIST OF CONDITIONS
1. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name,
address, and telephone number of the project(site)manager who will be on site and directly responsible
for the construction of the project.
2. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan,no structure
shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible for the site certifies that soil and
ground water on the entire site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use.
3. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer.
4. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior to construction,
demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent
5. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction.
6. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control and street sweeping which
will occur during construction.
7. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and removal of debris,
vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material generated during demolition and/or construction.
8. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting.
9. Noise levels from the resultant estAblishment(s) generated by operations, including but not limited to
refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the
ambient levels measured at the property line.
10. The developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill material needed for the
project.
11. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in an
environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health.
12. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and
confirmation that above conditions have been met.
13. The developer shall install grease traps, to contain grease in gray water, prior to it entering the city sewer
system in developments with 10 or more units and in compliance with the requirements of the City
Engineer
14. Salem sits in a Radon Zone I and the risk of radon entering buildings is extremely. Therefore, the
installation of radon mitigation systems are required.
15. The final construction must comply with all requirements of the Massachusetts State Sanitary code.
Amanda Chiancola
From: David Knowlton
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 11:11 AM
To: Amanda Chiancola
Subject: RE:task order
thanks Amanda, i think we need to the intersections of clark st and barnes road evaluated to ensure they have the
necessary capacity for the proposed traffic volumes.
everything else looks great, thanks
david
From: Amanda Chiancola
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 11:03 AM
To: David Knowlton
Subject: RE: task order
I have emailed the development to make him aware that the offsite drainage improvements are expected.
The developer has not been informed that a traffic engineer peer review is required. Will a full traffic study be required?
I arn also preparing a letter for him in which I want to outline exactly what those improvements are. The conditions
below are from the previous approval, are the same improvements going to be required?
1. The applicant shall perform an infiltration and inflow identification and removal program for the approximate
2,700 linear foot sewer system to which the proposed subdivision shall discharge sewage. The program shall be
completed and flows removed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any certificates of
occupancy. All pipes collecting sewage flow and discharging to the Highland Avenue pump station shall be
included in the program, The program shall be performed in strict compliance with the latest Guidelines for
Infiltration/inflow Analyses and Sewer System Evaluation Survey. No such work shall commence without first
meeting with the City Engineer to review the scope of work. All reports and summaries of work completed shall
be. reviewed by the City Engineer prior to the start of the next phase of work starting(phases are outlined in the
Guidelines). It is expected that the applicant will remove all extraneous infiltration and inflow that is cost
effective to remove up to an amount not to exceed a cost determined by the City Engineer. The amount of flow
removed shall not be less than the amount of flow to be added by the proposed subdivision.
I The applicant shall complete drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue as
depicted on the plan entitled "Clark Street Drainage Improvements", dated "January 9, 2008", revised February
13, 2008. The drainage improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including
temporary pavement of the trenches, within 30-days of work starting on the proposed subdivision site. In any
event, no building perrnits will be issued prior to completion of these drainage improvements, Temporary
paying shall remain and be maintained by the applicant, until the proposed subdivision is determined to be
substantially complete by the City Engineer, at which time the applicant shall provide a full width pavement
replacement program to the following limits from the center of the Clark Street/Clark Avenue Intersection: 240
feet easterly towards Barnes Road, and 30 feet westerly towards Highland Avenue.
3. The pavement replacement program applied to Clark Street shall consist of grinding and removing no less than 4
inches of the existing pavement,from curb to curb, and replacement with 2-inches (or more if necessary) of
binder and 2-inches of top pavement mix approved by the City Engineer. Final grading of the top mix shall
promote stormwater conveyance to the newly installed and existing drainage facilities on Clark Street and not
cause any issues with existing driveways. The pavement replacement program must be completed and
approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy,
1
4. On Clark Avenue frorn the Clark Street/Clark Avenue intersection southerly to the existing vertical granite
curbing,the applicant has agreed to patch all deficiencies and overlay with 2-inches of new pavement. This shall
occur when the subdivision is deemed to be substantially complete by the City Engineer.
5. If deemed necessary, prior to beginning the drainage improvement work the applicant shall file a Request for
Determination of Applicability with the Salem Conservation Commission and a Notice of Intent.
---------------- ------—
From: David Knowlton
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 10:44 AM
To: Amanda Chiancola; wmr@engineeringcorporation.com
Subject: RE: task order
in the last bullet, after walmart), please add "with the removal of all cost-effective, extraneous sewer flows equal to, or
greater than, the proposed sewer flows from the woodlands subdivision development"
Amanda, has anyone spoken to the developer to make sure they understand both off-site improvement requirements are
expected to be included in the subdivision approval? also, we need a traffic engineer to review access, etc.
thanks
From: Amanda Chiancola
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 10:14 AM
To: wmr@engineerinqcorporation.com
Cc: David Knowlton
Subject; RE: task order
Hi Bill,
I added minor comments regarding the staff review. I believe your scope is accurate, but c.c'd David Knowlton in case he
has any comments.
Thanks,
Amanda
From: wmr(Tbengineerinqcori)oration.com [mailto:wmr(cbengineerinqcorporation.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 1:38 PM
To: Amanda Chiancola
Subject: task order
Amanda, please find attached proposal for peer review.
Please advise if we over or under scoped the review based on our current understanding of the
project.
thanks.
Bill
note the S<,i�retary of staw,�affiec,has dvternained tiud raoM PmAls h)and from municipat offieWs are
Iiiil)iicf4�e(ii,(��'. 1�l-"l�le�i�ei,efL,rt(�� htip://www.see.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.ht
Ple�ise con-06� hit,, bdort� prinfing this emall.
g
2
CITY OF SALEM RECEIVED
PLANNING BOARD SEP 15 2015
13EK GF PLANNING&
REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS COMMUM'rY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
TO: BUILDING COMMISSIONER BOARD OF HEALTH
CONSERVATION COMMISSION SCHOOL DISTRICT
CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES
(X ) FIRE PREVENTION POLICE DEPARTMENT
Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review
this application relative to the Zoning Ordinance and/or to the Subdivision Regulations and
Massachusetts General Law Chapter 41.We would appreciate your completing the form below and
returning it to Erin Schaeffer, Staff Planner in the Department of Planning and Community
Development. She can be contacted by phone at 978-619-5691 or e-mail at eschaeffcr@salem.com
Application for the following:
Preliminary Subdivision Plan
Definitive Subdivision Plan
Waiver of Frontage Request
Site Plan Review
Planned Unit Development
Cluster Development
Business Park Development District
Wireless Communication Facilities Special Permit
North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permit
Flood Hazard District Special Permit
Drive-Through Special Permit
APPLICANT:
PROJECT NAME&ADDRESS: Clark Ave Map 6 Parcels 7,8,9
COMMENTS DUE: Requested by Sept 17, 2015 for hearing that night.
Please attach c6ents:
) SEE CO NTSATTACHED
CONCU WITH PROPOSAL
NEED ORF.ZNF0yMA-nON
CANNIT(;�bNC�4 WITH PROPOSAL
ug—
Ke�ture- Title 14
120 WASHINGTON STREEF, SALEM, MASSACHUsE'n's 01970 - PHoNE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - W\VW.SALE,%I.(:01V1
There is at this time an 8" main providing water to this area. We would want to see a hydraulic
report done by a third party source (whom we agree upon) defining what is needed for firefighting
capabilities for the sub division. The undefined lot should be taken into consideration in this report
with the maximum water supply requirements considered for the potential development of the
property.
No hammerheads adequate mining radius must be provided from Fire department spec. sheets.
120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740D404
WWW.SALEM.COM
FRECEIVED
00
CITY OF SALEM
OCT 2015
PLANNINGBOARD DEPT.OF PLANNING&
COMMUNI FY DEVELOPMENT
REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS
DATE: 10/5/2015
TO: ) BUILDING COMMISSIONER ( ) CONSERVATION COMM
) CITY ENGINEER ( FIRE PREVENTION
) BOARD OF HEALTH ( SCHOOL DISTRICT
) DISABILITIES COMMISSION (21) POLICE DEPARTMENT
) DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SERVICES
Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review
this application relative to the Zonmig Ordinance and/or to the Subdivision Regulations and MGL
Chapter 4 1. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to Amanda
Chiancola, she can be reached by phone at 978-619-5 691 or eniia at achiancola(q�-salem.corn.
( ) Prelirninary Subdivision Plan
XDefinitive Subdivision Plan
) Waiver from Frontage
).Drive-Through Special Permit
r*6y Cluster Development
r) Planned Unit Development
) Site Plan Review
) Business Park Development District
Wireless Communication Facilities Special Permit
NorLh River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Pernit
Flood Hazard District Special Permit
APPLICANT: Serafini,Darling and Correnti, LLP, C/o Attorney Correnti
PROJE CT NAME &ADDRESS: Clark Avenue,Assessors Map 6,Lots 7, 8, and 9.
CONTACT PERSON: Amanda Chiancola
COMMENTS DUE: Requested by 10/14/2015, for the 10/15 heating.
CONCUR VATH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side)
NEED MORE INFORMATION(Explain on reverse side)
CANNOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side)
COMMENTS INCLUDED
i e Da e
3ziewer's Signature-
120 rrsm'10
�Al t,M,C'0-11
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS
DATE: 4M—/(<—
TO: ) BUILDING COMMISSIONER BOARD OF HEALTH
�h4CONSERVATION COMMISSION SCHOOL DISTRICT
CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES
FIRE PREVENTION POLICE DEPARTMENT
Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review
this application relative to the Zoning Ordinance and/or to the Subdivision Regulations and
Massachusetts General Law Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and
returning it to Erin Schaeffer, Staff Planner in the Department of Planning and Community
Development. She can be contacted by phone at 978-619-5691 or e-mail at eschaeffergsalem.com
Application for the following:
Preliminary Subdivision Plan
Definitive Subdivision Plan
Waiver of Frontage Request
Site Plan Review
Planned Unit Development
Cluster Development
Business Park Development District
Wireless Communication Facilities Special Permit
North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permit
Flood Hazard District Special Permit
Drive-Through Special Permit
APPLICANT:
PROJECT NAME&ADDRESS: r-10,111,
CONEVIENTS DUE: Requested by for hearing that night.
Please attach comments-
SEE COMMENTS ATTACHED 0-0
CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL
NEED MORE INFORMATION 0A
CANNOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL
Reviewer J' Title Date
120 WASHINGFON S'I'REET, SALEM, MASSACHUsEiE's 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALE�,I.COM
Amanda Chiancola
From: Thomas St. Pierre
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 4:59 PM
To: Amanda Chiancola
Subject: Re: Request for Comments Almencla & Clark
Amanda, I have no other concerns.Thank you
Sent from my Whone
On Oct 8, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Amanda Chiancola<achiancola@Salem.com>wrote:
Hi Torn,
Based on some background information that Erin provided me, it is my understanding that your only
concern with Clark Avenue is the future development of lot 27. Do you have any additional comments
on the Clark Avenue Projects?
I appreciate your time and comments.
Best,
Amanda
................. ....... .
From: Amanda Chiancola
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 9:05 AM
To: Thomas St. Pierre
Cc: Erin Schaeffer
Subject: Request for Comments Almencla &Clark
Hi Tom,
How are you?There are two Form C subdivision applications on the Planning Board Agenda; Almeda
Street and Clark Avenue. I attached a Review sheet for each of the projects for you to complete as both
project are pending Building Commission Comments. Erin has told me you are familiar with both
projects, but if you need any additional information regarding the two projects please let me know.
Best,
Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Department of Planning & Community Development
120 Washington Street, 3 d Floor
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
<imageOO1.gif>
111CAst nole lhe �Secrcl��ry of sube's(Ifficu has determbled flial InOM ermlils 41)and from
municipal officials are public records, FNII plva�c ruftr to: http://,A-Nvw.sec.state.ma.us/pi-e/pl*eidx.htin.
Pfca,%v com'Adtr 0e envirminwnt b-fore pr4tiing ihisenudl.
1
<REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS Clark.doc>
mme simm fori
NEW ENGIAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CO".
120 WASHINGTON MEET,SUITE 202E,P.O.BOX 3026,SALEM,MA 01970
PH:978.741,7401-FAX:978.741.7402-,WWW.ENGINEEFUNGCORPORATTON.COM
March 9, 2016
Ms. Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Office of Planning and
Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 0 1970
Re: City of Salem RFQ 0-37—On-Call Civil Engineering Support Services, Task Order No. 34
(Amendment to Task Order 29) -
Peer Review Services, Woodlands Subdivision(formerly Chapel Hill Estates), Salem, MA
Dear Amanda:
I greatly appreciated the opportunity to work with the Planning Board on a peer review for the above
reference project. As discussed, we have prepared this Task Order letter amendment to increase the
budget for this project.
Proiect Understanding:
We prepared a November 24, 2015 review letter and in response to a revised set of plans dated
December 4, 2015 and a December 7, 2015 response letter, we prepared a second review letter dated
December 30, 2015.
SCOPE OF WORK:
Task 1)Review existing City of Salem utility plans and information in the vicinity of the proposed
Woodlands Subdivision on Clark Avenue and adjacent streets.
Task 2) Review previous City of Salem development review letter(s)and Planning Board conditions of
approval for previously approved project.
Task 3)Attend meeting with City Engineer to discuss specific City concerns to be addressed in the peer
review, including concerns and conditions from previous City Engineer review.
Task 4) Review and compare/contrast previous development plans with current revised development
plans, including building size and locations,parking and paved surface areas and configurations, grading
and topography, and drainage infrastructure onsite as well as City of Salem infrastructure impacts.
WATER RESOURCES - BURIED INFRASTRUCTURE-PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - LAND DEVELOPMENT
Task 5) Complete site visit to observe the number and location of existing sewer and drainage
structures, existing topography and impervious areas, and existing structures as shown on"Definitive
Plan & Profile, Sheets 4 and 5, by Williams & Sparages Engineering.
Task 6) Review Project Narrative and Environmental Impact Statement(not yet provided) and
Stormwater Report prepared by Williams& Sparages Engineering.
Task 7) Review site development plans prepared by Williams& Sparages Engineering. Review
proposed on-site stormwater management system, pre and post-development runoff calculations, and
stormwater quantity and quality issues. Review calculations for projected sanitary sewer flows,
hydraulic calculations for proposed sanitary sewer design,and layout of proposed water and sanitary
sewer piping.
Task 8)Attend up to one (1)meeting with engineering representatives of Williams& Sparages
Engineering to review the findings of the site walk and review of the documents summarized in Task 6.
Task 9)Prepare Letter Report summarizing findings of the record search, site walk,document review,
and meeting described in Tasks 1-8 above.
Task 10)Attend up to one (1)meeting with Staff Planner and City Engineer to discuss findings of Letter
Report.
Task 11) Plan for and attend up to one (1) Planning Board public hearings to present findings of peer
review.
Expanded SCOPE OF WORK:
Task 12)If requested by the City of Salem, provide additional engineering services as required to
complete additional site visits, review additional project plans and documents beyond those described
above, and attend additional meetings or public hearings.
PROJECT BUDGET:
Compensation for the Scope of work described in Task I through Task I I shall be made based on
periodic accrual invoices (time and materials),not to exceed the amount of One Thousand Six
Hundred Dollars($1,600.00)without written authorization from the City of Salem. Task 12 will be
completed on an accrual (time and materials) basis at an hourly rate of$88.00 to$160.00.
Written direction from the City of Salem will be required to expand scope of services.
NEW ENGIAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 2 of 4
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
New England Civil Engineering Corp. will complete the Scope of Services described in Task 1 through
Task I above within 20 working days following receipt of written authorization to proceed and copies of
all documents to be reviewed as described above.
PAYMENT TERMS:
Periodic invoices will be submitted to the Client and will be based on percentage completion of
individual tasks as described above. Invoices are payable within fourteen(14) days of receipt and
approval by Client.
EXPENSES:
The method for charging expenses, sub-contracted or supplemental services is 1.15 x the actual cost of
the direct expense.
ACCEPTANCE:
This Task Ordered letter proposal, in conjunction with the reference Contract RFQ 0-37 issuance of
Notice to Proceed dated June 3, 2013, will serve as an "Agreement to Professional Services". Please
sign this proposal in the space provided and return one executed copy to my attention at your earliest
convenience to initiate the project. We have provided five execution lines for City of Salem
authorization to proceed but will be happy to revise or append the format of this letter with additional
signature lines at your request.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at any
time onmy cell phone at978-767-5415 orat my Salem office at 978-741-7401. Wethankyouforthe
opportunity to work with the City of Salem and look forward to building on our successful and
rewarding partnership moving forward.
Sincerely,
0_ _�William .. 10
Project Manager/Principal Engineer
New England Civil Engineering Corp.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 3 of 4
Task Order No. 34 Authorization:
Kimberley Driscoll Datel
Mayo
4,Y I Durican, JCP Date:
��, AlCP
Director of Planning and
Community Development
Sarah Stanton Date:
Finance Director
ni Z� 9 /4) LP
Whitney Haskell Date:
Purchasing Agent
Elizabeth Rennard Date:
City Solicitor
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 4 of 4
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP.
120 WASHINGTON STREEr,SUITE 202E,P.O.BOX 3026,SALEM,MA 01970
PH:978.741.7401-FAX:978.741.7402-WWW.ENGINEEPINGCORPORATION.COM
December 30, 2015
Ms. Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Office of Planning and
Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 0 1970
Re: City of Salem RFQ 0-37—On-Call Civil Engineering Support Services, Task Order No. 29 -
Peer Review Services, Woodlands Subdivision(formerly Chapel Hill Estates), Salem, MA
Dear Amanda:
We are pleased to support the Salem Planning Board with peer review services for the above referenced
project. We understand the project is scheduled to be presented again at your upcoming January 7, 2015
meeting. We previously prepared a November 24, 2015 review letter and following our discussions
with the Applicant's engineer they have submitted a December 7, 2015 response letter with a revised set
of drawings dated December 4, 2015. We have prepared this project status letter for your consideration.
Project Understanding:
• NSD Realty Trust is proposing a development/redevelopment project on Clark Avenue . The
project will involve construction of twenty seven(27)building lots, two(2) lots of open space,
roadway buildings, parking lots, and related site work and utilities.
• The project has been proposed for development/redevelopment in the past as "Chapel Hill
Estates" and was approved but due to delay the approval expired. The plans and developer have
both changed since previously approved project, requiring resubmission.
• The City of Salem OCD will be reviewing the project for compliance with Salem Zoning
Ordinance and Section 7-2 Cluster Residential Development and the Salem Subdivision
Regulations.
• The City of Salem requests an independent peer review of the proposed development plans and
documentation including stormwater management, drainage, and on-site engineering issues
covered by the Environmental Impact Statement including garbage, snow storage, etc..
• Included in the peer review will be consideration of existing and proposed utilities, sewer
separation and infiltration issues.
• Specific documents to be reviewed include a Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision
Review Narrative (not yet reviewed, provided 11/24/15), Environmental Impact Statement,
Stormwater Permit and Stormwater Report, and a set of Design Drawings(10 sheets).
WATER RESOURCES - BURIED INFRASTRUCTURE-PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - LAND DEVELOPMENT
• We understand a notice of intent has been filed and wetland resource area provisions will be
reviewed by the Conservation Commission and are not part of this review.
• We understand the previous project was approved for this site with conditions that would require
drainage improvements offsite on Clark Avenue and a capacity study of the sanitary sewer
system tributary to the pumping station on Highland Avenue (near Walmart), including removal
of all cost-effective, extraneous flows equal to, or greater than the proposed sewer flows from
the Woodlands Subdivision development. We also understand there is a question about
adequacy of fire flows. It is not clear at this time if this project will be subject to the same
conditions and include the same improvements as the previous project, so a review of offsite
utilities serving the project and adjacent areas are not included in the scope of this peer review.
Review Comments:
Submittal Package
o The Woodlands Subdivision design plans, 10 sheets(8/25/15)
o Stormwater Report & Mitigative Drainage Analysis (08/31/15)
o Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision Review Narrative(provided 11/24/15)
o Environmental Impact Statement (provided 11/24/15)
o Stormwater Management Permit(City of Salem, Planning Dept.)
o Drainage Alteration Permit(City of Salem, Engineering Dept.)
o Previous Design Plans, Chapel Hill Subdivision, 13 sheets (10/26/07)
o City Engineer Memorandum(12/20/07)
o Previous Planning Board Decision(03/03/08)
Status=Ongoing, Stormwater Management Permit application, Drainage Alteration Permit application,
Environmental Impact Statement, and Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision Review
Narrative to be submitted for review.
Site Development Plans
• Lot 27, Utilities
Sheet I of 10, Lot 27
It is not clear what future plans are for Lot 27 (148,000 sf), as no drainage calculations or utility
connections relating to this site are incorporated into this project.
Status=Resolved- 12/7/15 Applicant Response Letter provides statement that there
are no development plans for this lot.
• Open Space and Access
Sheets I and 6 of 10
o Similar to the Chapel Hill subdivision plans, 3+acres of open space is proposed on the north
side of property and public access is provided to Open Space I in three locations with a
constructed access trail.
The Woodlands subdivision plans propose an additional 3+acres of open space on the south side
of the property, but it is not clear how public will access Open Space 2. A single access location
is provided around the back of Lot 27 and no access trail is proposed.
NEW ENGLAND CIX7IL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 2 of 7
Status=Ongoing discussion with Planning Board and Concom, revised 12/4/15 set
of plans includes additional open space train in Open Space Lot 2,for review and
approval by Planning Board.
o Items 9, 11, 12 from previous decision require access to Open Space and trail construction,but
restricts access trail construction to be completed without earthwork or machines, current
proposed access trial involves removal of existing soils, and replacement with 3" minus stone
(Sheet 5 of 10). Proposed construction is within the I 00-foot buffer zone of resource area and
downgradient of proposed erosion and sedimentation control barTier(Sheet 6 of 10).
Status=Unresolved— 12/7/15 Applicant Response Letter suggests the issue of trail
construction be discussed at Planning Board meeting.
Connection to Existing Utilities
Sheets 4-7 of 10
• Connectivity of City of Salem water and sewer utilities on Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue
Extension is not clear near points of proposed connection to the end of the cul-de-sac.
• City typically requests triple gate valves at points of connection to City water mains.
Status =Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Items 13 and 14 from previous decision require improvements and/or studies to identify
improvements to existing sewer and drainage utilities serving and in the vicinity of the
project area,but information about proposed improvements is not included in the
Status = Unresolved,Applicant working with City Engineer to finalize drainage and
sewer improvements adjacent to and off site of proposed development.
Proposed Utilities
Sheets 4-7 of 10
• Proposed water and sewer services are not shown on the plans, and should be included to
demonstrate 10-foot separation.
• Proposed water and sewer main layouts may need to be modified, to provide I 0-foot
separation in some areas, in particular in areas between large double catch basin structures.
• City typically requires triple gate valve connections at intersections, no gate valves are
proposed at South Ridge Circle intersection.
• Items 16 and 22 from previous decision require sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D
standards, plans should be revised to show separate fire service connections and valving to
meet this standard and City standards.
Status=Resolved, Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
Proposed Topography and Detention Basins
Sheets 4-7 of 10
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 3 of 7
Spot grades along tops of forebay and basin embankments (high points between topographic
contours)are referenced in report but not shown on plans, nor are forebay spillway elevations.
Recommend additional elevations be added to plans to facilitate construction.
Status=Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Lighting
Item 19 from previous decision describes street lighting requirements. A street lighting plan is
not included in the design drawings.
Status= Unresolved, Applicant provided a detail for proposed street lights in
12/4/15 plans, proposed locations of the street lights and conduits not yet provided.
• Irrigation Plan
An irrigation plan is not provided on utility drawings, Applicant to confirm if irrigation is
proposed and provide additional information about irrigation plan piping, connection to City
water main, and backflow prevention and metering.
Status =Resolved, Applicant states in 12/7/15 Response Letter that irrigation
sprinklers are not proposed.
• Snow Storage
Plan for snow storage is not clear on plans if applicable.
Status =Ongoing. Applicant has stated in 12/7/15 Response Letter that roadside
snow storage is typical for residential streets. We have no solution to offer other
than "haul out", but want to point out for discussion that snow storage at the end of
cul-de-sacs may be problematic due to the likely obstruction of catch basins at each
cul-de-sac and two driveways at one cul-de-sac.
• Details
Sheets 8, 9, and 10 of 10
• Item 17 from previous decision requires sidewalks with vertical granite curbs, and requires
the sloped granite curb detail be removed from the plans. Plans do not clarify material for
proposed sidewalks, City typically looks for concrete walks. Plans still include sloped
granite curb detail which must be removed.
• Typical fire hydrant detail appears to be missing water main line type on CAD.
• Detail for proposed ADA ramp does not appear to allow for ramp alignment across
intersections and along crosswalks.
• Detail for rip rap embankment includes 4" perforated underdrain, location of underdrain
piping is not shown on plans.
• Foundation underdrain detail shown on Sheet 5, foundation underdrain piping is not shown
on plans.
Status =Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 4 of 7
• Trail detail shown on Sheet 5 requires equipment and excavation, refer to previous comments
about open space trails.
Status = Unresolved— 12/7/15 Applicant Response Letter suggests the issue of trail
construction be discussed at Planning Board meeting.
• Numerous street trees (43)proposed along subdivision within grass strip. Grass strip appears
to be approximately 2-feet wide between curb and sidewalk. Tree detail identifies root ball
and size of excavation which do not appear to fit within grass strip. Recommend sidewalk
layout be modified to 3 to 5-foot minimum width per City standards, and/or to include tree
pits to facilitate trees.
Status =Unresolved,Applicant to provide a list to Planning Board of trees suitable
for planting in space available. Note: Page 8,paragraph 18 of Cluster Development
Special Permit states trees will be minimum 3-1/2" caliper at breast height.
• Cul-tec recharger detail provided on Sheet 9. Layout of recharger on Sheet 4 identifies a 4"
outlet pipe at elevation 124.94'. The outlet pipe and piped discharge location is not
identified on the detail or the layout.
• A single, generic outlet control structure provided for reference without pipe sizes and
elevations. Recommend specific details for outlet control structures be provided for each of
the four basins for constructability.
Status =Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
Permits and Environmental Impact
• Environmental Impact Statement
Status=Unresolved,Applicant to provide permit application and narrative.
• Drainage Alteration Permit(Engineering Dept.)
Project includes a number of fill areas, including proposed cuts of approximately 20-feet and
fills of approximately 16-feet. As a result, the project requires a drainage alteration permit from
Salem Engineering Department.
Status = Unresolved,Applicant to provide permit application and narrative.
• Stormwater Management Permit (Planning Dept.)
Status =Resolved.
Cluster Development Special Permi
Page 9,paragraph 24,0., The drainage system for this project must be reviewed and approved by the
Northeast Mosquito Control and Wetlands Management District.
Status = Unresolved, Applicant to clarify conformance with this paragraph.
fl� NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 5 of 7
Stormwater and Drainave
• Mitigative Drainage Analysis
o Page 3, Catchment Mapping: Pre and Post development drainage catchment area delineation
mapping was not provided for reference as part of the submittal package. Sheets 7 and 8
identify pre and post-contours and a single set of proposed flow arrows, but due to the extent
of contour changes(20 foot cuts and 16 foot fills) it is difficult to visualize the changes to
runoff patterns. It is also not clear if or how this project is influenced by runoff from
adjacent property to the east.
Status =Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Mitigative Drainage Analysis
• Page I of 20: Required and provided volumes are confusing between table provided on page
1, 2, 9, and 10. Request clarification or explanation of the information provided.
• Page 7, Pond 1: volume table references elevation 13 1, plans appear to show bottom at 132'.
Request clarification.
• Page 9, Pond 1: storage depth listed at 0.75',plans appear to show 132.5'-]32'=0.5'.
• Page 9, Pond 2: storage depth listed at 0.50', plans appear to show 128.5'-128.5'=O'.
• Page 10, Pond 4: storage depth listed at 1.0', plans appear to show 1 17.5'-1 17=0.5'
• Page 10, CuftTec system: volume calculated as open void between 124.94' and 122.4',plans
appear to show stone layer below 122.9' which may reduce volume.
Status =Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Emergency Overflow
Page 4, Pond 1: It is not clear where emergency overflow from pond I spillway will flow,
appears to be opposite direction of planned discharge.
Status =Resolved, Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan
o Page 1, Paragraph 11 states assumption that the City of Salem will assume fall responsibility
of continuing the operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system. hem 8
of previous decision states that a homeowner's association will have several responsibilities
including maintenance of the stormwater management system which is in conflict.
Status=Resolved, Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans. Homeowners Association will be responsible for operations and
maintenance.
• Operations and Maintenance Plan
o O&M Plan does not appear to include Sediment and Oil Separator.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 6 of 7
• O&M Plan does not appear to include sediment forebays and removal of sediment from
forebays and detention basins if applicable.
• Design of detention basins does not appear to provide vehicular access to the forebays and
basins for maintenance, which are obstructed by walls or steep slopes in some places.
• Maintenance of sub-surface infiltrators on page 2 requires the crushed stone and cul-tec
chambers to be removed and replaced once sediment accumulates 3", which would represent
a significant cost if required.
Status =Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Stormwater Checklist:
Page 4 states Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Standards only to the maximum extent
practicable, Page 7 states that Standard 7 is not applicable which appears to be in conflict.
Status=Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Pre and Post Runoff- Standard 2 (Page 5)
Pre and post runoff analysis provided for 2, 10, 100 year storm events and calculations
predict that pre and post-development runoff rate requirements are met.
Status=Previously Resolved.
• Groundwater Recharge—Standard 3 (Pages 1, 2, 9, 10)
Calculations predict recharge requirements met,however request clarification of required
and provided recharge volume calculations in previous comments.
Status =Resolved,Applicant addressed in 12/7/15 Response Letter and 12/4/15
revised plans.
• Water Quality—Standard 4
TSS removal tables narrative details that pre-treatment is provided prior to infiltration BMPs
and 80%TSS removal provided by BMP trains, (providing maintenance is performed).
Status =Previously Resolved.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at any
time on my cell phone at 978-767-5415 or at my Salem office at 978-741-7401.
Sincerely,
William M. Ross, P.E.
Project Manager/Principal Engineer
New England Civil Engineering Corp.
Cc: David Knowlton, City Engineer
Lynn Duncan, Amanda Chiancola, Salem Planning OCDP
Clients/Salem/Wwdlands/12 302015 letter
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 7 of 7
1
Project file: SALE-0026
WILLIAMS
SPARAGES
ENGINE� d �NM , SURMOM
December 7,2015
Ms.Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner
Office of Planning and Community Development S
120 Washington Street
Salem,MA 0 1970
RE: The Woodlands Subdivision, Salem MA; NSD Realty Trust,Applicant
Response to Peer Review Comments by New England Civil Engineering Corp.
Dear Amanda,
The purpose of this letter is to respond to comments received from New England Civil
Engineering Corp. (NECE)as a result of their peer review of The Woodlands Subdivision plans
in a letter dated November 24,2015 by Mr.WiHiam M.Ross.,P.E. The NECE comments are
shown below in italics,and,the Williams& Sparages responses are in the bold text that follows.
Site Development Plans
Lot 2 7, Utilities
Sheet I of I 0,-Lot 2 7
It is not clear whatfuture plans arefor Lot 27(148,000 sj), as no drainage calculations
or utility connections relating to this site are incorporated into this project.
Presently there are no development plans for this lot.Any proposed future development for
Lot 27 would be required to comply with the criteria of all applicable permits for the City of
Salem,including,but not limited to,engineering,zoning,site plan review,planning and
conservation.
Open Space and Access
Sheets I and 6 of 10
o Similar to the Chapel ITt 11 subdivision plans, 3+acres of open space is proposed on th e
north side ofpropen),andpublic access is provided to Open Space I in three locations
with a constructed access trail.
The Woodlands subdivision planspropose an additional 3+acres ofopen space on the
south side of the prcperiy� but it is not clear howpublic will access Open Space 2. A
single access location isprovided around the back ofLot 27 and no access trail is
proposed.
Based on discussions with the planning department and conservation commission we have
added a wallIng path within"Open Space 2"and lot 27.
o Items 9, 11, 12ftom previous decision require access to Open Space and trail
construction, but restricts access trail construction to be completed without earthwork or
machines, current proposed access trial involves removal of e)dsting soils, and
replacement with 3"minus stone(Sheet 5 of.10). Proposed construction is within the
189 North Main Street, Suite 101 e Middleton, MA01949 e Tel: (978) 539V- Q88 a www.wsengineers.com
Response to Peer Review by NECE
The Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
1 00-foot buffer zone ofresource area and downgradient ofjoroposed erosion and
sedimentation control bar,ier(Sheet 6 of 10).
We suggest this item be discussed at the public hearing.
Connection to Existing Utilities
Sheets 4-7 of 10
o Connectivity of City ofSalem water and sewer utilities on Clark Avenue and Clark
Avenue Extension is not clear near points ofliroposed connection to the end ofthe cul-
de-sac.
The sewer and water connections are shown on Profile Sheets 1 &2. The applicant
proposes to run an eight(8")live sewer within the twenty-foot(20')wide easement for their
benefit located on the adjacent land to the northwest owned Now or formerly(N/F)by
Jeffrey M.&Ellen T.Rogato,Assessor's ID No. 02-0046.
o City typically requests triple gate valves atpoints of connection to City water mains.
We have added two(2) additional water gates to the revised plans at the water main
connection in Clark Avenue.
o Items 13 and l4froin previous decision require improvements andlor studies to
identify improvements to existing sewer and drainage utilities serving and in the vicinity
of the project area, but information aboutproposed improvements is not included in the
(sic)
These items are currently the subject of discussion with the Planning Board.
Proposed Utilities
Sheets 4-7 of 10
o Proposed water and sewer services are not shown on the plans, and should be
included to demonstrate 10-foot separation.
We have added the water&sewer service locations to the revised plans. Also,see note 8 on
the Index Sheet which requires a ten(10')minimum separation as well as an eighteen-inch
(18")vertical separation where the lines cross.
o Proposed water and sewer main layouts may need to be modified, to provide
I 0-foot separation in some areas, in particular in areas between large double
catch basin structures.
On Woodlands Road,the only section where the horizontal separation is less than 10'from
the water to the sewer is from centerline station 2+83 to station 3+52. However,in this
location the vertical separation from the bottom of the water main(holding 51 of cover)to
the top of the 8"PVC sewer pipe is greater than 1811 and complies with note 8 as mentioned
above. See revised profile which shows the section in question.
2
Response to Peer Review by NECE
The Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
On South Ridge Circle,the only section where the horizontal separation is less than 101
from the water to the sewer is from centerline station 0+87 to station 0+94. However,in this
location(at the sewer manhole)the vertical separation from the bottom of the water main to
the top of the 811 PVC sewer pipe is greater than 18"and complies with note 8. See revised
profile which shows the section in question.
c City typically requires triple gate valve connections at intersections, no
gate valves are proposed at South Ridge Circle intersection.
We have added triple gates to the proposed water mains at the intersection of Woodlands
Road and South Ridge Circle.
o Items 16 and 22from previous decision require sprinklers in accordance with
NFPA 13D standards,plans should be revised to show separatefire service
connections and valving to meet this standard and City standards.
It is our understanding that the residential sprinklers will not require a separate fire
service.
Proposed Topography and Detention Basins
Sheets 4-7 of 10
Spot grades along tops offorebay and basin embankments(high points between
topographic contours)are referenced in report but not shown on plans, nor are
forebay spillway elevations. Recommend additional elevations be added to plans to
facilitate construction.
We have added additional spot elevations,text and contour labels to the infiltration basins
on the revised plans as recommended.
Lighting
Item l9front previous decision describes street lighting requirements. A street
lightingplan is not included in the design drawings.
Design to be provided by the service utility provider and/or towns lighting consultant.The
prior approval document had specific language regarding the street lights.We would expect
a similar condition for this project.
Irrigation Plan
An irrigation plan is not provided on utility drawings,Applicant to confirm if
irrigation is proposed andprovide additional information about irrigation plan
piping, connection to City water main, and backflowprevention and metering.
No irrigation plan is proposed
Response to Peer Review by NECE
The Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
Snow Storage
Planfor snow storage is not clear on plans if applicable.
Snow storage to be at roadside as is typical for residential streets.
Details
Sheets 8, 9, and 10 of 10
o Item I 7from previous decision requires sidewalks with vertical granite curbs,
and requires the sloped granite curb detail be removedfi-om the plans. Plans
do not clarify materialforproposed sidewalks, City typically looksfor concrete
walks. Plans still include sloped granite curb detail which must be removed.
It is agreed that vertical granite will be used for the curbing.
o Typicalfire hydrant detail appears to be missing water main line type on CAD.
See the revised detail which provides additional clarification on the size and type of water
main.
o Detailforproposed ADA ramp does not appear to allowfor ramp alignment across
intersections and along crosswalks.
We have moved the ramps to be in line with the direction of travel.
o Detailfor rip rap embankment includes 4"perforated underdrain, location of
underdrain piping is not shown on plans.
We have added text to the detail that requires the 4"perforated PVC to discharge to
"daylight"at intervals no greater than 30'. In the past,it has been our experience that this
allows the installer flexibility in case an obstacle or other condition prevents the installation
of the proposed underdrain where shown on the plans.
o Foundation underdrain detail shown on Sheet 5,foundation underdrain piping
is not shown on plans.
This is a generic detail. Detailed locations will be provided on the designs for the
individual lots. A note has been added prohibiting the discharge of the underdrains
towards the sidewallL
o Trail detail shown on Sheet 5 requires equipment and excavation, refer to previous
comments about open space trails.
See response to previous comment above.
4
Response to Peer Review by NECE
Thd Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
o Numerous street trees(43)proposed along subdivision within grass strip. Grass
strip appears to be approximately 2-feet wide between curb and sidewalk. Tree
detail identifies root ball and size ofexcavation which do not appear to fit within
grass strip. Recommend sidewalk layout be modified to 3 to 5-foot minimum width
per City standards, andlor to include tree pits tofacilitate trees.
The cross-section proposed is the standard cross-section.We will provide a list of street
trees that are preferred.
o Cul-tec recharger detailprovided on Sheet 9. Layout ofrecharger on Sheet 4
identifies a 4"outlet pipe at elevation 124.94'. The outlet pipe andpiped
discharge location is not identified on the detail or the layout.
The four(4")inch outlet pipe has been removed from the design since the time of the
original submittal. See the revised plans.
o A single, generic outlet control structure providedfor reference withoutpipe
sizes and elevations. Recommend specific detailsfor outlet control structures be
providedfor each ofthefour basinsfor constructability.
We have added specific details for each control structure for the four surface ponds. See
sheet I I of I I on the revised plans.
Permits and Environmental Impa
• Environmental Impact Statement
• Drainage Alteration Permit(Engineering Dept.)
Project includes a number offill areas, includingliroposed cuts ofopproximittely 20-
feet andfills of approximately 16-feet. As a result, the project requires a drainage
alteration permitfrom Salem Engineering Department.
A drainage alteration permit will be requested from the engineering Department.
# Stormwater Management Permit(Planning Dept.)
This permit has been applied for by the Applicant.
Stormwater and Drainage
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
o Page 3, Catchment Mapping:Pre and Post development drainage catchment area
delineation mapping was notprovidedfor reference aspart of the submittal
package. Sheets 7 and 8 identifypre andpost-contours and a single set of
proposedflow arrows, but due to the extent ofcontour changes(20firot cuts an
l6footfills)it is difficult to visualize the changes to runoffpatterns. It is also not
clear if or how this project is influenced by runofffrom adjacentproperty to the
east.
5
Response to Peer Review by NECE
The Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
Existing&proposed condition watershed maps dated August 14,2015 were placed in a
pocket at the back of the original drainage report. The proposed condition watershed map
has been revised since that time, see November 10,2015.
There is some tributary area from the land to the cast which is accounted for in the existing
and proposed watershed calculations. Part of the area shown in Sub catchment EX-I flows
to the north and reaches the limit of the watershed analysis coincident with the edge of
bordering vegetated wetlands.
Two other Sub catchments,EX4 &EX-5,are both tributary to two separate isolated
wetland areas as shown on the watershed maps which in the proposed condition falls within
Lot 27.
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
o Page 1 of20.-Required and provided volumes are confusing between table provided
on page 1, 2, 9, and 10. Request clarification or explanation ofthe information
provided.
Page I breaks down the proposed impervious area into two types,i.e. roof or pavement. We
then calculated the amount of required groundwater recharge volume based on hydrologic
soil group"C",0.35 inches multiplied by the proposed impervious area of 121,471 sq.ft.
The proposed water quality volume was then calculated by multiplying 0.5 inch(not in a
critical area)times the amount of proposed pavement. The roof area is considered"Clean"
by DEP and therefore is excluded from this calculation.
The groundwater recharge volume calculated is greater than the water quality volume and
therefore governs for the target amount of treatment volume that must be provided in the
proposed infiltration basins.
We then showed the amount of volume provided in the proposed infiltration basins equaling
6,094 cu.ft.which is greater than the amount of groundwater recharge volume required
equaling 3,280 cu.ft.
Page 2 is a check for the DEP compliance that the amount of impervious area captured by
the proposed stormwater management system is at least 65%for the project. This project
captures 86%of the impervious area and therefore meets this requirement.
We then check to be certain that each infiltration basin is able to provide enough treatment
volume based on the amount of impervious area tributary to ft. As you can see from the
table,each basin meets the requirement.
The DEP Total Suspended Solids(TSS) removal requirement of 80%is met by the project
which provides 85%,see spreadsheets.
Pages 9& 10 show the minimum size of the inflitration area using DEP's"Simple Dynamic"
method and how we are meeting the bottom of the system area requirement for each basin.
6
Response to Peer Review by NECE
The Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
o Page 7, Pond 1: volume table references elevation 131,plans appear to show
bottom at 132'. Request clarification.
Pages 7&8 are the forebay sizing requirement calculations,therefore,the bottom
elevations shown are for the forebays and not the bottom of the basin elevations.
o Page 9, Pond 1: storage depth listed at 0.75 , plans appear to show
132.5'-132'=0.5'.
The bottom of proposed Infiltration Basin 1 is elevation 132.0, the level eighteen
inch (1811) HT)PE pipe and the four inch (4") diameter orifice in the control
structure are both set at 132.75 which accounts for the 0.75' of storage provided.
o Page 9, Pond 2: storage depth listed at 0.50', plans appear to show
128.5'-128.5'=O'.
The bottom of proposed Infiltration Basin 2 is elevation 128.0, the level eighteen
inch (18") IRDPE pipe and the two and one-half inch (2.5") diameter orifice in the
control structure are both set at 128.50 which accounts for the 0.51 of storage
provided.
o Page 10, Pond 4: storage depth listed at 1.0 , plans appear to show
117.5'-117=0.5'
The bottom of proposed Infiltration Basin 4 is elevation 117.0, the level eighteen
inch (18") HDPE pipe and the six inch (6") diameter orifice in the control
structure are both set at 118.00 which accounts for the 1.01 of storage provided.
o Page 10, Cultec system: volume calculated as open void between 124.94'and
122.4',plans appear to show stone layer below 122.9'which may reduce volume.
This calculation is not for storage volume but for the area of the infiltration surface.
Therefore,the volume provided in the stone is not in question,only depth to the outlet from
the bottom of the system. As mentioned in the analysis,we have removed the outlet from
the system and once it reaches capacity,runoff from the roadway will bypass the proposed
catch basins at the entrance and will be intercepted by the existing catch basin on Clark
Avenue Extension. Based on the surface area provided, 1,487 sq.ft.,this far exceeds the
requirement shown equaling 86 sq.ft. shown in the equation.
Emergency Overflow
Page 4, Pond 1: It is not clear where emergency overflowfirom pond I
spillway willflow, appears to be opposite direction ofplanned discharge.
The emergency overflow from Infiltration Basin 1,if used,would flow over the 8' long stone
spillway then discharge along the northerly side of the proposed retaining wall at the rear
boundary Hue of Lot 12 adjacent to land owned N/F by Tran 2014 Realty Trust and then
onto Clark Avenue Extension.
7
Response to Peer Review by NECE
The Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
Long Tenn Pollution Prevention Plan
o Page 1, Paragraph II states assumption that the City of Salem will assume full
responsibility of continuing the operation and maintenance of the stormwater
management system. Item 8 of previous decision states that a homeowner's
association will have several responsibilities including maintenance of the
stormwater management system which is in conflict.
The Applicant is willing to accept a condition from the Planning Board that the
responsibility of stormwater maintenance lies with the City of Salem or the Homeowner's
Association We will adjust the language in the documents.
Operations and Maintenance Plan
o O&M Plan does not appear to include Sediment and Oil Separator.
The OR& Sediment Separator unit is included in the November 10,2015 revision.
o O&M Plan does not appear to include sedimentforebays and removal ofsediment
firomforebays and detention basins if applicable.
See the November 10,2015 revision which outlines the procedure for debris removal from
the InlUtration Basins which the sediment forebays are a part of. I I
o Design ofdetention basins does not appear to provide vehicular access to the
forebays and detention basinsfor maintenance, which are obstructed by walls
or steep slopes in some places.
See the areas labeled in the drainage easements which provide areas for access with
maintenance equipment on the revised plans.
o Maintenance ofsub-surface infiltrators on page 2 requires the crushed stone and
cul-tec chambers to be removed and replaced once sediment accumulates 3
which would represent a significant cost ifrequired.
This procedure would only be required if the crushed stone on the bottom of the system
were to become completely clogged and no longer allowed the exlUtration of water. It is our
experience with similar projects utflWng deep-sump catch basins and an on/sediment
separator that there is enough pre-treatment to prevent this from happening.
Stormwater Checklist:
Page 4 states Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Standards only to the
maximum extentpracticable, Page 7 states that Standard 7 is not applicable which
appears to be in conflict.
This box is only checked as it relates to the DEP standard 3 for groundwater recharge for
sites comprised solely of hydrologic son group C and D soils and/or bedrock at the land
surface and not for redevelopment which is standard 7.
8
Response to Peer Review by NECE
The Woodlands Subdivision
December 7,2015
Pre and Post Runoff-Standard 2 (Page 5)
Pre andpost runoffanalysisprovidedfor2, 10, 100 year storm events and
calculations predict rates that pre and post-development runoff rate
requirements are met.
No response by Williams& Sparages required.
Groundwater Recharge—Standard 3 (Pages 1, 2, 9, 10)
Calculations predict recharge requirements met,however request clarification
of required and provided recharge volume calculations in previous comments.
See previous responses which provide the necessary clarification.
Water Quality—Standard 4
TSS removal tables narrative details that pre-treatment is providedprior to
infiltration BMPs and 80%TSS removalprovided by BMP trains, (providing
maintenance is performed).
No response by Williams& Sparages required.
We trust that you will find the above responses to the peer review comments provided by NECE
satisfactory. Should you have any additional questions,comments or concerns please do not
hesitate to contact me by phone or email.
Very Truly Yours,
Richard L.Williams,P.E.
Principal
Cc: David Knowlton, City Engineer
William M.Ross,P.E.
NSD Realty Trust
9
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP.
120 WASHING FON STREET,SUITE 202E,P.O.BOX 3026,SALEM,MA 01970
PH:978.741.7401-FAX:978.741.7402-WWW.ENGINEERINGOORPORATION.COM
November 24, 2015
Ms. Amanda Chiancola
Staff Planner
Office of Planning and
Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970
Re: City of Salem RFQ 0-37—On-Call Civil Engineering Support Services,Task Order No. 29 -
Peer Review Services, Woodlands Subdivision(formerly Chapel Hill Estates), Salem, MA
Dear Amanda:
We are pleased to support the Salem Planning Board with peer review services for the above referenced
project. We understand the project was scheduled to be presented at your upcoming December 3, 2015
meeting but has been continued and the discussion of utilities and stormwater will take place at a
subsequent meeting. We have prepared this project status letter for your use in future meetings.
Project Understanding:
• NSD Realty Trust is proposing a development/redevelopment project on Clark Avenue . The
project will involve construction of twenty seven(27)building lots, two(2) lots of open space,
roadway buildings, parking lots, and related site work and utilities.
• The project has been proposed for development/redevelopment in the past as "Chapel Hill
Estates"and was approved but due to delay the approval expired. The plans and developer have
both changed since previously approved project,requiring resubmission.
• The City of Salem OCD will be reviewing the project for compliance with Salem Zoning
Ordinance and Section 7-2 Cluster Residential Development and the Salem Subdivision
Regulations.
• The City of Salem requests an independent peer review of the proposed development plans and
documentation including stormwater management, drainage, and on-site engineering issues
covered by the Environmental Impact Statement including garbage, snow storage, etc..
• Included in the peer review will be consideration of existing and proposed utilities, sewer
separation and infiltration issues.
• Specific documents to be reviewed include a Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision
Review Narrative(not yet reviewed, provided 11/24/15), Environmental Impact Statement(not
yet reviewed� provided 11/24/15), Stormwater Permit and Stormwater Report(dated August 3 1,
2015), and a set of Design Drawings (10 sheets).
WATER RESOURCES - BURIED INFRASTRUCTURE-PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - LAND DEVELOPMENT
• We understand a notice of intent has not yet been filed and wetland resource area provisions will
be reviewed by the Conservation Commission and are not part of this review.
• We understand the previous project was approved for this site with conditions that would require
drainage improvements offsite on Clark Avenue and a capacity study of the sanitary sewer
system tributary to the pumping station on Highland Avenue(near Walmart), including removal
of all cost-effective, extraneous flows equal to, or greater than the proposed sewer flows from
the Woodlands Subdivision development. We also understand there is a question about
adequacy of fire flows. It is not clear at this time if this project will be subject to the same
conditions and include the same improvements as the previous project, so a review of offsite
utilities serving the project and adjacent areas are not included in the scope of this peer review.
Review Comments:
Submittal Package
o The Woodlands Subdivision design plans, 10 sheets (8/25/15)
o Stormwater Report&Mitigative Drainage Analysis(08/31/15)
o Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision Review Narrative(Not yet provided)
o Environmental Impact Statement(Not yet provided)
o Stormwater Management Permit(City of Salem, Planning Dept.)
o Drainage Alteration Permit(City of Salem, Engineering Dept.)
o Previous Design Plans, Chapel Hill Subdivision, 13 sheets (10/26/07)
o City Engineer Memorandum (12/20/07)
o Previous Planning Board Decision(03/03/08)
Status=Ongoing, Stormwater Management Pennit application, Drainage Alteration Permit application,
Environmental Impact Statement, and Cluster Residential Development and Subdivision Review
Narrative to be submitted for review.
Site Development Plans
Lot 27, Utilities
Sheet I of 10, Lot 27
It is not clear what future plans are for Lot 27 (148,000 sf), as no drainage calculations or utility
connections relating to this site are incorporated into this project.
Status= Unresolved, Request Applicant clarify plans for this proposed Lot 27, as they relate to impacts
on the proposed water, sewer, and drainage utilities in the development.
Open Space and Access
Sheets I and 6 of 10
o Similar to the Chapel Hill subdivision plans, 3+acres of open space is proposed on the north
side of property and public access is provided to Open Space I in three locations with a
constructed access trail.
The Woodlands subdivision plans propose an additional 3+ acres of open space on the south side
of the property,but it is not clear how public will access Open Space 2. A single access location
is provided around the back of Lot 27 and no access trail is proposed.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 2 of 7
o Items 9, It, 12 from previous decision require access to Open Space and trail construction,but
restricts access trail construction to be completed without earthwork or machines, current
proposed access trial involves removal of existing soils, and replacement with 3"minus stone
(Sheet 5 of 10). Proposed construction is within the I 00-foot buffer zone of resource area and
downgradient of proposed erosion and sedimentation control barrier(Sheet 6 of 10).
Status=Unresolved, Request clarification if previous requirements are applicable to this project with
respect to access to open space and construction of access trail, and recommend layout be confirmed
with Conservation.
Connection to Existing Utilities
Sheets 4-7 of 10
o Connectivity of City of Salem water and sewer utilities on Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue
Extension is not clear near points of proposed connection to the end of the cul-de-sac.
o City typically requests triple gate valves at points of connection to City water mains.
o Items 13 and 14 from previous decision require improvements and/or studies to identify
improvements to existing sewer and drainage utilities serving and in the vicinity of the
project area, but information about proposed improvements is not included in the
Status= Unresolved, Recommend Applicant revised proposed water connection to include triple gate
valves and coordinate with City Engineering Department regarding capacity and improvements to the
existing drain and sewer utilities.
Proposed Utilities
Sheets 4-7 of 10
o Proposed water and sewer services are not shown on the plans, and should be included to
demonstrate 10-foot separation.
o Proposed water and sewer main layouts may need to be modified, to provide 10-foot
separation in some areas, in particular in areas between large double catch basin structures.
o City typically requires triple gate valve connections at intersections, no gate valves are
proposed at South Ridge Circle intersection.
o Items 16 and 22 from previous decision require sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D
standards, plans should be revised to show separate fire service connections and valving to
meet this standard and City standards.
Status=Unresolved, Recommend Applicant revise plans to address proposed utility comments as
appropriate.
Proposed Topography and Detention Basins
Sheets 4-7 of 10
Spot grades along tops of forebay and basin embankments (high points between topographic
contours) are referenced in report but not shown on plans, nor are forebay spillway elevations.
Recommend additional elevations be added to plans to facilitate construction.
Status= Ongoing, Recommend Applicant provide additional elevations to plans for constructability.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 3 of 7
Lighting
Item 19 from previous decision describes street lighting requirements. A street lighting plan is
not included in the design drawings.
Status=Unresolved, Request clarification if previous requirements are applicable to this project with
respect to street lighting(and other miscellaneous issues in Items 15 and 16), and revise design plans to
include street lighting and additional information as required.
Irrigation Plan
An irTigation plan is not provided on utility drawings, Applicant to confirm if irrigation is
proposed and provide additional information about irrigation plan piping, connection to City
water main, and backflow prevention and metering.
Status—Ongoing. Applicant to confirm and/or provide additional information.
Snow Storage
Plan for snow storage is not clear on plans if applicable.
Status=Ongoing. Applicant to confirm if snow storage is need and will be provided.
Details
Sheets 8, 9, and 10 of 10
• Item 17 from previous decision requires sidewalks with vertical granite curbs, and requires
the sloped granite curb detail be removed from the plans. Plans do not clarify material for
proposed sidewalks, City typically looks for concrete walks. Plans still include sloped
granite curb detail which must be removed.
• Typical fire hydrant detail appears to be missing water main line type on CAD.
• Detail for proposed ADA ramp does not appear to allow for ramp alignment across
intersections and along crosswalks.
• Detail for rip rap embankment includes 4" perforated underdrain, location of underdrain
piping is not shown on plans.
• Foundation underdrain detail shown on Sheet 5, foundation underdrain piping is not shown
on plans.
• Trail detail shown on Sheet 5 requires equipment and excavation, refer to previous comments
about open space trails.
• Numerous street trees (43)proposed along subdivision within grass strip. Grass strip appears
to be approximately 2-feet wide between curb and sidewalk. Tree detail identifies root ball
and size of excavation which do not appear to fit within grass strip. Recommend sidewalk
layout be modified to 3 to 5-foot minimum width per City standards, and/or to include tree
pits to facilitate trees.
• Cul-tec recharger detail provided on Sheet 9. Layout of recharger on Sheet 4 identifies a 4"
outlet pipe at elevation 124.94'. The outlet pipe and piped discharge location is not
identified on the detail or the layout.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 4 of 7
o A single, generic outlet control structure provided for reference without pipe sizes and
elevations. Recommend specific details for outlet control structures be provided for each of
the four basins for constructability.
Status=Unresolved, Recommend Applicant revise plans to address construction detail comments as
appropriate.
Permits and Environmental Impact
Enviromnental Impact Statement
tatus=Unresolved, Applicant to provide permit application and narrative.
Drainage Alteration Permit(Engineering Dept.)
Project includes a number of fill areas, including proposed cuts of approximately 20-feet and
fills of approximately 16-feet. As a result, the project requires a drainage alteration permit from
Salem Engineering Department.
Status=Unresolved, Applicant to provide permit application and narrative.
; Stormwater Management Permit (Planning Dept.)
tatus=Unresolved, Applicant to provide permit application and narrative for review.
Stormwater and Drainave
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
o Page 3, Catchment Mapping: Pre and Post development drainage catchment area delineation
mapping was not provided for reference as part of the submittal package. Sheets 7 and 8
identify pre and post-contours and a single set of proposed flow arrows,but due to the extent
of contour changes(20 foot cuts an 16 foot fills) it is difficult to visualize the changes to
runoff patterns. It is also not clear if or how this project is influenced by runoff from
adjacent property to the east.
Status=Ongoing, Request Applicant provide pre and post-catchment delineation maps identifying the
limits of all runoff entering or leaving the project area including adjacent land if applicable.
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
• Page I of 20: Required and provided volumes are confusing between table provided on page
1, 2, 9, and 10. Request clarification or explanation of the information provided.
• Page 7, Pond 1: volume table references elevation 13 1,plans appear to show bottom at 132'.
Request clarification.
• Page 9, Pond 1: storage depth listed at 0.75', plans appear to show 132.5'-132'=0.5'.
• Page 9, Pond 2: storage depth listed at 0.50', plans appear to show 128.5'-128.5'=O'.
• Page 10, Pond 4: storage depth listed at 1.0', plans appear to show 11 7.5'-117=0.5'
• Page 10, CuItTec system: volume calculated as open void between 124.94' and 122.4', plans
appear to show stone layer below 122.9' which may reduce volume.
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 5 of 7
Status=Unresolved, Request clarification on comments listed above and whether reduced volumes if
applicable will impact the mitigative drainage analysis.
Emergency Overflow
Page 4, Pond 1: It is not clear where emergency overflow from pond I spillway will flow,
appears to be opposite direction of planned discharge.
Status=Unresolved, Applicant to clarify.
Long Tenn Pollution Prevention Plan
o Page 1, Paragraph 11 states assumption that the City of Salem will assume full responsibility
of continuing the operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system. Item 8
of previous decision states that a homeowner's association will have several responsibilities
including maintenance of the stormwater management system which is in conflict.
Status=Unresolved, Applicant to clarify who will be responsible for the operations and maintenance
program for all the stromwater BMPs which is quite extensive.
• Operations and Maintenance Plan
• O&M Plan does not appear to include Sediment and Oil Separator.
• O&M Plan does not appear to include sediment forebays and removal of sediment from
forebays and detention basins if applicable.
• Design of detention basins does not appear to provide vehicular access to the forebays and
detention basins for maintenance, which are obstructed by walls or steep slopes in some
places.
• Maintenance of sub-surface infiltrators on page 2 requires the crushed stone and cul-tec
chambers to be removed and replaced once sediment accumulates 3", which would represent
a significant cost if required.
Status=Ongoing, request clarification on O&M plan for all BMPs, access to BMPs to facilitate
maintenance, and responsible party for the operations and maintenance program for all the
stromwater BMPs which is quite extensive.
• Stormwater Checklist:
Page 4 states Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Standards only to the maximum extent
practicable, Page 7 states that Standard 7 is not applicable which appears to be in conflict.
Status=Ongoing, Applicant to clarify.
Pre and Post Runoff- Standard 2 (Page 5)
Pre and post runoff analysis provided for 2, 10, 100 year storm events and calculations
predict ates that pre and post-development runoff rate requirements are met.
Status= Resolved.
Groundwater Recharge—Standard 3 (Pages 1, 2, 9, 10)
M� NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 6 of 7
Calculations predict recharge requirements met, however request clarification of required
and provided recharge volume calculations in previous comments.
Status=Unresolved, pending response to previous comments.
Water Quality—Standard 4
TSS removal tables narrative details that pre-treatment is provided prior to infiltration BMPs
and 80% TSS removal provided by BMP trains, (providing maintenance is performed).
Status=Resolved.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at any
time on my cell phone at 978-767-5415 or at my Salem office at 978-741-7401.
Sincerely,
William M. Ross, P.E.
Project Manager/Principal Engineer
New England Civil Engineering Corp.
Cc: David Knowlton, City Engineer
Lynn Duncan, Amanda Chiancola, Salem Planning OCDP
Clients/Salem/Woodlands/1 1242015 letter
I71L NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP. Page 7 of 7
PURCHASE ORDER
Fiscal Year 2016 Page PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(978)745-9595 EXT 5692
Purchase 120 WASHINGTON STREET 3RD FL
Order # 03004137-00 SALEM, MA 01970
NEW ENGLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P 0 BOX 3026 (978)745-9595 EXT 5692
120 WASHINGTON ST SUITE 202E 120 WASHINGTON STREET 3RD FL
SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA
1 01970
—��Wendor Phone Number I.Vendor Fax Nuirkbor DiRequisition NumberY. RP.WL�k-Defivery Reference Wwtnav-,w
978-741-7401 978-741-7402 00004530
'Vendor,Number2l a Date equi
F Departmept/Location
,Date Ordered,7� k ied'd QMRFreight MethodlTernnsV4=?*�— nml
11/09/15 015930 11/09/15 1 PLANNING
DescOpTiontPart Ufijt/Oly��,-�,Mff RRAZICost Each fW HPPM!,�'-'Extended Price
ORIGINAL
001 1.00 4800.00000 4, 800.00
EACH
STORM WATER PEER REVIEW, TASK ORDER
#29 - CLARK AVENUE
PO Total 4,800.00
Ceneral Ledger Summary Section
Account Amount
24573-5713 4,800.00
CITY RECORDS INDICATE SUFFICIENT UNENCUMBERED FUNDS
CITY OF SALEM ARE PRESENT IN THE BUDGET ACCOUNT.
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
120 Washington Street APPROVED BY
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 9641 r
TEL (978) 745-9595 FAX (978) 744-5918 Whitney C. Haskell
Purchasing Agent
SALES TAX EXEMPTION #E-046-001-413 (NOT VALID WITHOUT CITY PURCHASING AGENT'S SIGNATURE)
SERAFINi, DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP
/�Op 0
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET o,,
P 16'
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
oz�,,,�, 74104
JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEP
JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE
978-741-468�
November 5, 2015
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner
City of Salem
Department of Planning and Community Development
120 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Re: NSID Realty Trust
Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan and
Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit
Application for Stormwater Management
Clark Avenue and Clark Avenue Extension
Assessor's Map 6, Parcels 7, 8 and 9
Dear Amanda:
Enclosed please find check in the amount of $4,800.00, payable to the
City of Salem, representing the civil engineering peer review fee in connection
with the above project.
If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me.
JVe truly yours,
k
J seph C. Correnti
Enclosures
cc: client
City of Salem Department of Planning &
Community Development
CHECK RECEIPT AND TRACKING FORM
DATE BOARD )n cA n n in STAFFAV"CJL
CLIENT: e0?Qe-ah*
PROPERTY ADDRESS: NIKK A\)e
CONTACT NUMBER: Li L4 C)2-12
PURPOSEFOR
APPLICATION: 5hv-V0L,0a4cg,
CHECK # - 2-s(-,oc>
AMOUNTRECEIVED: s
Project file: SALE-0026 WILLIAMS
SPARAGES
ENGIN� . �NEM . SURVMM
September 24, 2015 T
Salem Planning Board S
93 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970
RE: The Woodlands Subdivision, Salem, MA
Stormwater Management permit
Dear Dana,
Please consider this letter an application for a Stormwater Management Permit pursuant
to Chapter 37 of the City of Salem Code of ordinances. We are attaching the stormwater
management report for the Woodlands residential subdivision project for your use and
review. Please note that the report will also be submitted to the Salem Conservation
Commission as part of the anticipated Notice of Intent filing.
The report's contents support compliance with Salem's Stormwater Management
Ordinance as well as the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Policy and associated
regulations. The report provides specific detailed information regarding all necessary
compliance with the policy, which is referenced as the standard in Chapter 37 .
It is my understanding that this letter will allow the planning board to issue a Stormwatei
Management permit as part of the ongoing permit modification process.
Please feel free to let me know if you require further information or if you have any
questions regarding this submittal.
Richard L. Williams, P.E.
Principal
189 North Main Street, Suite 101 e Middleton, MA 01949 Tel: (978) 539-8088 www.wsengineers.com
Project No. SA LE-0026
Applicant:
NSD Realty Trust
76 Oakville Street
Lynn, MA 01905
Stormwater Report &
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
for Proposed Cluster
Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands"
(Clarke Avenue)
Salem, Massachusetts
August 31, 2015
-W,CC
WILLIAMS
SPARAGES
T
S
189 North Main Street,Suite 101
Middleton,MA 01949
978-539-8088 Ph
978-539-8200 Fax
www.wsen&oers.com
OF MA,9 Of
PETER M.
BLAISDELL,JR,
0 CIVIL
No,41613
.1e.
STORMWATER REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
1. USGS Locus Map
2. Checklist for Stormwater Report
3. Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan (LTPPP)
4. Construction Period Pollution Prevention Pla n & Erosion
and Sedimentation Control (CPPPP)
5. Mitigative Drainage Analysis
6. Summary Tables
7. Existing Condition HydroCAD Analysis
8. Proposed Condition HydroCAD Analysis
9. Compliance Calculations
Total Groundwater Recharge Required
Percent Capture directed to Recharge
Water Quality Volume/TSS Removal
TSS Removal Excel Spreadsheet
Forebay sizing
Simple Dynamic Method for sizing Recharge
Drawdown Time
Catch Basin Capacity Analysis
Pipe Sizing Calculations
10. Soil Information
11. Operation & Maintenance Plan
12. Erosion & Sediment Control Plan
13. Snow disposal guidelines
14. Deicing Chemical (Road Salt) Storage
WILLIAMS&SPARAGES 189 NORTH MAIN STREET
CIVIL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS&
WILLIAMS SUITE 101
LAND SURVEYORS SPARAGE� MIDDLETON,MA 0 1949
PHONE:(978)539-8088
T FAX:(978)539-8200
www.wsengincers.com
iver"
TO
osf
lond
�X
00
t
�105�0 7,
�2
Ffi -AS
Cuff
t I s
lgtl '-AV'
ct Point
Rbck
Fred ss.4
Rack Rom
Z
Outer ",ut
14
UNITED STATES GEOLOGIC SURVEY MAP VICINITY MAP
2015 LYNN QUADRANGLE "THE WOODLANDS"CLUSTER SUBDIVISION
SCALE: 1:24,000(1"=2000') (CLARK AVENUE)
< CONTOUR INVERVAL=10-(NAVD 88) DANVERS,MASSACHUSETTS
I
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
A. Introduction
important:When A Stormwater Report must be submitted with the Notice of Intent permit application to document
filling out forms compliance with the Stormwater Management Standards. The following checklist is NOT a substitute for
on the computer'
use only the tab the Stormwater Report(which should provide more substantive and detailed information) but is offered
key to move your here as a tool to help the applicant organize their Stormwater Management documentation for their
cursor-do not Report and for the reviewer to assess this information in a consistent format.As noted in the Checklist,
use the return the Stormwater Report must contain the engineering computations and supporting information set forth in
key.
Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook.The Stormwater Report must be prepared and
certified by a Registered Professional Engineer(RPE) licensed in the Commonwealth.
The Stormwater Report must include:
The Stormwater Checklist completed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer(see
page 2)that certifies that the Stormwater Report contains all required submittals.' This Checklist
is to be used as the cover for the completed Stormwater Report.
Applicant/Project Name
Project Address
Name of Firm and Registered Professional Engineer that prepared the Report
Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan required by Standards 4-6
Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan required
by Standard 82
Operation and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9
In addition to all plans and supporting information, the Stormwater Report must include a brief narrative
describing stormwater management practices, including environmentally sensitive site design and LID
techniques, along with a diagram depicting runoff through the proposed BMP treatment train. Plans are
required to show existing and proposed conditions, identify all wetland resource areas, NRCS soil types,
critical areas, Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPL), and any areas on the site
where infiltration rate is greater than 2.4 inches per hour. The Plans shall identify the drainage areas for
both existing and proposed conditions at a scale that enables verification of supporting calculations.
As noted in the Checklist, the Stormwater Management Report shall document compliance with each of
the Stormwater Management Standards as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. The
soils evaluation and calculations shall be done using the methodologies set forth in Volume 3 of the
Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook.
To ensure that the Stormwater Report is complete, applicants are required to fill in the Stormwater Report
Checklist by checking the box to indicate that the specified information has been included in the
Stormwater Report. If any of the information specified in the checklist has not been submitted, the
applicant must provide an explanation. The completed Stormwater Report Checklist and Certification
must be submitted with the Stormwater Report.
The Stormwater Report may also include the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement required by Standard 10. If not included in
the Stormwater Report,the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement must be submitted prior to the discharge of stormwater runoff to
the post-construction best management practices.
2 For some complex projects,it may not be possible to include the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan in
the Stormwater Report. In that event,the issuing authority has the discretion to issue an Order of ConclMons that approves the
project and includes a condition requiring the proponent to submit the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
before commencing any land disturbance aclivity on the site.
swcheck.doc 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page 1 of 8
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Prote ction
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
B. Stormwater Checklist and Certification
The following checklist is intended to serve as a guide for applicants as to the elements that ordinarily
need to be addressed in a complete Stormwater Report.The checklist is also intended to provide
conservation commissions and other reviewing authorities with a summary of the components necessary
for a comprehensive Stormwater Report that addresses the ten Stormwater Standards.
Note: Because stormwater requirements vary from project to project, it is possible that a complete
Stormwater Report may not include information on some of the subjects specified in the Checklist. If it is
determined that a specific item does not apply to the project under review, please note that the item is not
applicable(N.A.)and provide the reasons for that determination.
A complete checklist must include the Certification set forth below signed by the Registered Professional
Engineer who prepared the Stormwater Report.
Registered Professional Engineer's Certification
I have reviewed the Stormwater Report, including the soil evaluation, computations, Long-term Pollution
Prevention Plan, the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (if included), the Long-
term Post-Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan, the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement(if
included)and the plans showing the stormwater management system, and have determined that they
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards as
further elaborated by the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. I have also determined that the
information presented in the Stormwater Checklist is accurate and that the information presented in the
Stormwater Report accurately reflects conditions at the site as of the date of this permit application.
Registered Professional Engineer Block and Signature
OF MASO
40
PETER
BLAISDELL,JR
0 CIVIL
No.41613
10W.-
Signature and Date 4V
Checklist
Project Type: Is the application for new development, redevelopment, or a mix of new and
redevelopment?
New development
Redevelopment
El Mix of New Development and Redevelopment
swcheck.doc 04101/08 Stomwater Report Checklist Page 2-61'_8
Massachusetts Department of Enviro nmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
Checklist (continued)
LID Measures: Stormwater Standards require LID measures to be considered. Document what
environmentally sensitive design and LID Techniques were considered during the planning and design of
the project:
No disturbance to any Wetland Resource Areas
Site Design Practices (e.g. clustered development, reduced frontage setbacks)
El Reduced Impervious Area(Redevelopment Only)
ED Minimizing disturbance to existing trees and shrubs
El LID Site Design Credit Requested:
El Credit 1
Credit 2
Credit 3
El Use of"country drainage" versus curb and gutter conveyance and pipe
Bioretention Cells(includes Rain Gardens)
EI Constructed Stormwater Wetlands (includes Gravel Wetlands designs)
El Treebox Filter
El Water Quality Swale
E Grass Channel
El Green Roof
El Other(describe):
Standard 1: No New Untreated Discharges
No new untreated discharges
Outlets have been designed so there is no erosion or scour to wetlands and waters of the
Commonwealth
El Supporting calculations specified in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook included.
swcheck.doc 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page�-o—f8
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
Checklist (continued)
Standard 2: Peak Rate Attenuation
El Standard 2 waiver requested because the project is located in land subject to coastal storm flowage
and stormwater discharge is to a wetland subject to coastal flooding.
Evaluation provided to determine whether off-site flooding increases during the 1 00-year 24-hour
storm.
Calculations provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-
development rates for the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour storms. If evaluation shows that off-site
flooding increases during the 1 00-year 24-hour storm, calculations are also provided to show that
post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development rates for the 1 00-year 24-
hour storm.
Standard 3: Recharge
El Soil Analysis provided.
0 Required Recharge Volume calculation provided.
El Required Recharge volume reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits.
Sizing the infiltration, BMPs is based on the following method: Check the method used.
Static Simple Dynamic El Dynamic Field'
El Runoff from all impervious areas at the site discharging to the infiltration BMP.
0 Runoff from all impervious areas at the site is not discharging to the infiltration BMP and calculations
are provided showing that the drainage area contributing runoff to the infiltration BMPs is sufficient to
generate the required recharge volume.
0 Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume.
0 Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume only to the maximum
extent practicable for the following reason:
0 Site is comprised solely of C and D soils and/or bedrock at the land surface
El M.G.L. c. 21 E sites pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000
El Solid Waste Landfill pursuant to 310 CMR 19.000
ED Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent
practicable.
Calculations showing that the infiltration 13MPs will drain in 72 hours are provided.
El Property includes a M.G.L. c. 21 E site or a solid waste landfill and a mounding analysis is included.
80%TSS removal is required prior to discharge to infiltration BMP if Dynamic Field method is used.
swcheck.doc-04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page 4 of 8
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
Checklist (continued)
Standard 3: Recharge(continued)
The infiltration BMP is used to attenuate peak flows during storms greater than or equal to the 10-
year 24-hour storm and separation to seasonal high groundwater is less than 4 feet and a mounding
analysis is provided.
El Documentation is provided showing that infiltration BMPs do not adversely impact nearby wetland
resource areas.
Standard 4: Water Quality
The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan typically includes the following:
0 Good housekeeping practices;
0 Provisions for storing materials and waste products inside or under cover;
0 Vehicle washing controls;
a Requirements for routine inspections and maintenance of stormwater BMPs;
0 Spill prevention and response plans;
0 Provisions for maintenance of lawns, gardens, and other landscaped areas;
a Requirements for storage and use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides;
0 Pet waste management provisions;
0 Provisions for operation and management of septic systems;
0 Provisions for solid waste management;
0 Snow disposal and plowing plans relative to Wetland Resource Areas;
0 Winter Road Salt and/or Sand Use and Storage restrictions;
a Street sweeping schedules;
0 Provisions for prevention of illicit discharges to the stormwater management system;
0 Documentation that Stormwater BMPs are designed to provide for shutdown and containment in the
event of a spill or discharges to or near critical areas or from LUHPPL;
a Training for staff or personnel involved with implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan;
0 List of Emergency contacts for implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan.
A Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan is attached to Stormwater Report and is included as an.
attachment to the Wetlands Notice of Intent.
Treatment 13MPs subject to the.44%TSS removal pretreatment requirement and the one inch rule for
calculating the water quality volume are included, and discharge:
El is within the Zone 11 or Interim Wellhead Protection Area
0 is near or to other critical areas
El is within soils with a rapid infiltration rate(greater than 2.4 inches per hour)
0 involves runoff from land uses with higher potential pollutant loads.
E] The Required Water Quality Volume is reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits.
Calculations documenting that the treatment train meets the 80%TSS removal requirement and, if
applicable, the 44%TSS removal pretreatment requirement, are provided.
swcheck.doc 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Cheddist-Page�_of8
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
Checklist (continued)
Standard 4: Water Quality(continued)
The BMP is sized (and calculations provided) based on:
ThOr 1"Water Quality Volume or
El The equivalent flow rate associated with the Water Quality Volume and documentation is
provided showing that the BMP treats the required water quality volume.
El The applicant propos es to use proprietary BMPs, and documentation supporting use of proprietary
BMP and proposed TSS removal rate is provided. This documentation may be in the form of the
propriety BMP checklist found in Volume 2, Chapter 4 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook
and submitting copies of the TARP Report, STEP Report, and/or other third party studies verifying
performance of the proprietary BMPs.
El A TMDL exists that indicates a need to reduce pollutants other than TSS and documentation showing
that the BMPs selected are consistent with the TMDL is provided.
W .A_ Standard 5: Land Uses With Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPLs)
EI The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan(SWPPP)has been included with the Stormwater Report.
The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the SWPPP will be submitted prior
to the discharge of stormwater to the post-construction stormwater BMPs.
El The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit does not cover the land use.
LUHPPLs are located at the site and industry specific source control and pollution prevention
measures have been proposed to reduce or eliminate the exposure of LUHPPLs to rain, snow, snow
melt and runoff, and been included in the long term Pollution Prevention Plan.
Ej All exposure has been eliminated.
[:1 All exposure has not been eliminated and all BMPs selected are on MassDEP LUHPPL list.
El The LUHPPL has the potential to generate runoff with moderate to higher concentrations of oil and
grease(e.g. all parking lots with >1000 vehicle trips per day)and the treatment train includes an oil
grit separator, a filtering bioretention area, a sand filter or equivalent.
Standard 6: Critical Areas
El The discharge is near or to a critical area and the treatment train includes only BMPs that MassDEP
has approved for stormwate,discharges to or near that particular class of critical area,
El Critical areas and BMPs are identified in the Stormwater Report.
swcheck.doc-04/01/08 Stomwater Report Checklist-Page 6 of 8
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
Checklist (continued)
Standard 7: Redevelopments and Other Projects Subject to the Standards only to the maximum
extent practicable
El The project is subject to the Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum Extent
Practicable as a:
171 Limited Project
El Small Res idential Projects: 5-9 single family houses or 5-9 units in a multi-family development
provided there is no discharge that may potentially affect a critical area.
El Small Residential Projects: 2-4 single family houses or 2-4 units in a multi-family development
with a discharge to a critical area
E] Marina and/or boatyard provided the hull painting, service and maintenance areas are protected
from exposure to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff
El Bike Path and/or Foot Path
El Redevelopment Project
EI Redevelopment portion of mix of new and redevelopment.
El Certain standards are not fully met(Standard No. 1, 8, 9, and 10 must always be fully met)and an
explanation of why these standards are not met is contained in the Stormwater Report.
Ll The project involves redevelopment and a description of all measures that have been taken to
improve existing conditions is provided in the Stormwater Report. The redevelopment checklist found
in Volume 2 Chapter 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook may be used to document that
the proposed stormwater management system (a)complies with Standards 2, 3 and the pretreatment
and structural BMP requirements of Standards 4-6 to the maximum extent practicable and (b)
improves existing conditions.
Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control
A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan must include the
following information:
• Narrative;
0 Construction Period Operation and Maintenance Plan;
• Names of Persons or Entity Responsible for Plan Compliance;
• Construction Period Pollution Prevention Measures;
• Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Drawings;
Detail drawings and specifications for erosion control BMPs, including sizing calculations;
0 Vegetation Planning;
a Site Development Plan;
0 Construction Sequencing Plan;
* Sequencing of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls;
0 Operation and Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls;
0 Inspection Schedule;
0 Maintenance Schedule;
a Inspection and Maintenance Log Form.
A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan containing
the information set forth above has been included in the Stormwater Report.
swcheck.doc-04/01/08 Stomwater Report Checklist-Page Ti;f—8
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program
Checklist for Stormwater Report
Checklist (continued)
Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control
(continued)
El The project is highly complex and information is included in the Stormwater Report that explains why
it is not possible to submit the Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan With the application.A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and
Erosion and Sedimentation Control has not been included in the Stormwater Report but will be
submitted before land disturbance begins.
El The project is not covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit.
El The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit and a copy of the SWPPP is in the
Stormwater Report. I
Z The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit but no SWPPP been submitted.
The SWPPP will be submitted BEFORE land disturbance begins.
Standard 9: Operation and Maintenance Plan
The Post Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan is included in the Stormwater Report and
includes the following information:
Name of the stormwater management system owners;
Party responsible for operation and maintenance;
Z Schedule for implementation of routine and non-routine maintenance tasks;
Plan showing the location of all stormwater BMPs maintenance access areas;
Description and delineation of public safety features;
Estimated operation and maintenance budget; and
Operation and Maintenance Log Form.
EJ The responsible party is not the owner of the parcel where the BMP is located and the Stormwater
Report includes the following submissions:
F1 A copy of the legal instrument(deed, homeowner's association, utility trust or other legal entity)
that establishes the terms of and legal responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the
project site stormwater BMPs;
E] A plan and easement deed that allows site access for the legal entity to operate and maintain
BMP functions.
Standard 10: Prohibition of Illicit Discharges
The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan includes measures to prevent illicit discharges;
An Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached;
EI NO Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached but will be submitted prior to the disch.arge of
any stormwater to post-construction BMPs.
swcheck.doc 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page 8d_8
Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan (LTPPP)
"The Woodlands" (Clark Avenue)
Salem, Massachusetts
August 31, 2015
This Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan has been prepared to comply with the provisions set
forth in the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(DEP) Stormwater Management
Standards.Structural Best Management Practices(BMPs) require periodic maintenance to insure
proper function and efficiency in pollutant removal from stormwater discharges that would
otherwise reach wetland resource areas untreated. Maintenance schedules found below are as
recommended in Department of Environmental Protection�s Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook
and as recommended in the manufacturer's specifications.
1. Street Sweeping:
The streets shall be swept twice a year preferably but at the very least once per year in the
spring.
11. Ownership and Maintenance Responsibilities:
To the best of our knowledge,after completion of the The Woodlands Subdivision the City of
Salem will assume full responsibility of continuing the operation and maintenance of the
stormwater management system as well as the long term pollution prevention plan outlined
below unless a legally-binding agreement is made with another party to perform such
duties.
111.DEP Standard 4:Water Ouali
The Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan includes the following:
A. Good housekeeping practices;
Prevent or reduce pollutant runoff from reaching the wetland resource areas through
street sweeping,stabilizing all disturbed areas with vegetative,cover,catch basin
cleaning and cleaning the sediment&oil separator units.
B. Provisions for storing materials and waste products inside or under cove r;
All materials on site are to be stored in a neat and orderly fashion in their appropriate
containers and,if possible,under a roof or other secure enclosure. All waste products
are to be placed in secure receptacles until they are emptied by a solid waste
management company licensed in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
C.Vehicle washing controls;
The Homeowner�s Association shall encourage residents to wash their vehicles on
lawn or gravel areas so that the ground can filter the water naturaUy. This will
prevent soap,dirt and oil from reaching the storm drains and ultimately wetlands,
streams,rivers or marine waters. Encourage residents to wash their vehicles at
commercial car washes which recycle water and use approximately 60% on average
of the amount of water used in a home wash.
Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan
The Woodlands Subdivision, Salem, MA
August 31, 2015
D. Requirements for routine inspections and maintenance of Stormwater BMP`s;
Follow the procedures outlined in the Operation and Maintenance Plan as well as the
provided Long Term Inspection and Maintenance Forms.
E.Spill prevention and response plans;
Spill Prevention: As mentioned previously,all materials on site are to be stored in a
neat and orderly fashion in their appropriate containers and,if possible,under a roof
or other secure enclosure. Products shall be kept in their original containers with the
original manufacturer's label. Products should not be n-dxed unless recommended by
the manufacturer. The manufacturer's recommendations for proper use and disposal
shall be followed at all times and,if possible,all of the product should be used up
before proper disposal.
Response:The manufacturer's recommended methods for cleanup must be followed
and spills cleaned up immediately after discovery. Spills shall be kept well ventilated
and personnel must wear appropriate protective gear to prevent injury from contact
with hazardous substances. Spills of toxic or hazardous material'must be reported to
the appropriate local and/or State agencies in accordance with the local and/or
Commonwealth of Massachusetts regulations.
F.Requirements for storage and use of fertilizers,herbicides and pesticides;
Consult the Order of Conditions issued by the City of Salem Conservation
Commission for any questions regarding these materials.
Fertilizers: Fertilizers are to be applied,at the minimum amounts recommended by
the manufacturer and once applied shall be worked into the soil to limit the
possibility of entering the storm drains. Storage procedures are to be followed as
previously stated and the contents of any partially used bags should be transferred to
a sealable container,either bag or bin to avoid spilling.
Herbicides and Pesticides:Storage of these materials are to be as outlined previously
and especially out of the reach of pets and children,away from damp areas where
their containers may succumb to moisture or rust and should not be stored near food.
These materials must not be placed in the trash or washed down the drain. Handle
using rubber gloves.and use an appropriate mask when using these products for
extensive periods of time.
G.Provisions for maintenance of lawns,gardens,and other landscaped areas;
These activities are to be left up to the individual homeowner's to schedule and
perform.
H.Pet waste management provisions;
These activities are to be left up to the individual homeowner's to schedule and
perform.
2
Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan
The Woodlands Subdivision, Salem, MA
August 31, 2015
I. Provisions for operation and maintenance of septic systems;
Not applicable,project will be connected to municipal sewer.
J. Provisions for solid waste management;
All waste products are to be placed in secure receptacles until they are emptied by a
solid waste management company licensed in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
K.Snow disposal and plowing plans relative to Wetland Resource Areas;
Snow disposal/removal is to be in compliance with the Bureau of Resource
Protectiori�s (BRPs) Snow Disposal Guidelines effective March 8,2001,Guideline No.
BRPG01-01.
L. Winter Road Salt and/or Sand Use and Storage restrictions;
Road Salt:Storage is to be as mentioned previously and the use must be in
compliance with the Guidelines on Deicing Chemical(Road Salt) Storage effective
date December 19,1997,Guideline No. DWSG97-1 found in the BRP's Drinking
Water Program.
Sand Use: Encourage the use of environmentally friendly alternatives such as calcium
chloride and/or sand instead of road salt for melting ice whenever possible.
M.Street Sweeping schedules;
As mentioned previously,street sweeping should be performed by the City twice per
year in the spring and fall;however,at the very least sweeping must occur once a
year in the spring in order to minin-dze the amount of Total Suspended Solids load on
the deep-sump catch basins and the other Best Management Practices tributary
thereto.
N.Provisions for prevention of illicit discharges to the stormwater management systems;
There are no proposed illicit discharges to the proposed stormwater management
systems as can be seen on the Definitive Plans.
According to Standard 10 in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook,Illicit
discharges to the stormwater management system are discharges that are not entirely
comprised of stormwater. Notwithstanding the foregoing,an illicit discharge does
not include discharges from the following activities or facilities: firefighting,water
line flushin&landscape irrigation,uncontan-dnated groundwater,potable water
sources,foundation drains,air conditioning condensation,footing drains,individual
resident car washing,flows from riparian habitats and wetlands,dechlorinated water
from swin�ming pools,water used for street washing and water used to clean
residential buildings without detergents.
0. Documentation that Stormwater BMPs are designed to provide for shutdown and
containment in the event of a spill or discharges to or near critical areas or from land
uses with higher potential pollutant loads (LUHPPL);
Not applicable as this project does not meet the criteria for a LUHPPL.
3
Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan
The Woodlands Subdivision, Salem, MA
August 31, 2015
0.Training for staff or personnel involved with implementing LTPPP;
This responsibility lies with the Owner until after completion of the Stone Ridge
Heights Subdivision when the Homeowner's Association will assume full
responsibility unless a legally-binding agreement is made with another party to
perform such duties for the Homeowner's Association.
P. List of Emergency contacts for implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan,
This responsibility lies with the Owner until after completion of the Stone Ridge
Heights Subdivision when the Homeowner's Association will assume full
responsibility unless a legally-binding agreement is made with another party to
perform such duties for the Homeowner's Association.
4
LONG-TERM INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
(LONG-TERM POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN)
THE WOODLANDS (CLARK AVENUE)
SALEM, MA
TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 7 DAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION
TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL EVENT OF 0.5
INCHES OR GREATER FOUR TIMES PER YEAR THEREAFTER OR WHEN
SEDIMENT ACCUMULATES TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES OR GREATER,
Name of Inspector: Date:
Inspectors Company/Affiliation:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
poor
yes - no fair
good
poor
yes - no fair
good
poor
yes - no fair
g od
poor
yes - no fair
gooa
poor
yes - no fair
good
poor
yes - no fair
good
Maintenance Required:
To Be Performed By: On of Before:
LONG-TERM INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
(LONG-TERM POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN)
THE WOODLANDS (CLARK AVENUE)
SALEM, MA
TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAIN FALL
EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER
TO BE COMPLETED TWICE PER YEAR FOR FIRST THREE (3) YEARS
AFTER COMING ON-LINE AND THEN ONCE PER YEAR THEREAFTER
Name of Inspector: Date:
Inspectors Company/Affiliation:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
,N-FMVAtW M minor moderate/ major
minor/ moderate / major
minor I moderate / major
minor moderate/ major
Maintenance Required:
To Be Performed By: On of Before:
LONG-TERM INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
(LONG-TERM POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN)
THE WOODLANDS (CLARK AVENUE)
SALEM, MA
TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL
EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER DURING CONSTRUCTION
TO BE COMPLETED TWICE PER YEAR FOR FIRST THREE (3) YEARS
AFTER COMING ON-LINE AND THEN ONCE PER YEAR THEREAFTER
Name of Inspector: Date:
Inspectors Company/Affiliation:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
__�_ W
0MIX2,89 ME
Maintenance Required:
To Be Performed By: On of Before:
LONG-TERM INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
(LONG-TERM POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN)
THE WOODLANDS (CLARK AVENUE)
SALEM, MA
TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL
EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER DURING CONSTRUCTION
TO BE COMPLETED TWICE PER YEAR FOR FIRST THREE (3) YEARS
AFTER COMING ON-LINE AND THEN ONCE PER YEAR THEREAFTER
Name of Inspector: Date:
Inspectors Company/Affiliation:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
poor
yes - no fair
good
poor
yes - no fair
good
poor
yes no fair
good
poor
yes no fair
good
poor
yes no fair
good
Maintenance Required:
To Be Performed By: On of Before:
Construction Period Pollution Prevention Plan and
Erosion and Sedimention Control
r
PTD'b' � gm " d"-"A' The Woodlands i NSD Realty Trust
,cl,1N meAn
R Wi:JTu Clark Avenue V si 76 Oakville Street
e,
4 -
I ym RAA 01905
,,or
Salem, MA
This project involves the construction of two paved roadways to provide access for
a 26 lot cluster residential subdivision and one additional lot zoned mostly
7 �41 , ,
Di 3t I I industrial
Soil disturbing activities inicude: earth&ledge removal, clearing and grubbing;
installation of erosion and sediment control device, pavement installation, utility
installation, home construction, landscaping and preparation for final loaming and
seeding.
I The final composite runoff coefficient for the site is approximately 0.4
,.!MThe site is approximately 17.2 acres of which approximately 8.5 acres
ctivities.
will be disturbed by const ction a
�' jw�Fw' 73- -�7---V���7V
The order of activities shall be as follows:
1. Install construction entrances 9. Finished grading and slope stabilization
2. Install erosion control devices 10. Finished Paving
3. Clearing, cutting and grubbing 11. Loam and seed all disturbed areas.
4. Rough grading 12. Final cleanup including inspection and
5. Utility Installation cleanout of all stormwater structures.
6. Gravel and pavement base course installation
7. House lot construction
8. Curbing and sidewalk construction
The site is tributary to wetlands that are tributary to the Forest River
F
Temporary Stabilization -On sediment producing areas, where the period of exposure is more than two
months, but less than 12 months, the following procedure should be followed: a. install needed surface water
control measures, b. perform all cultural operations at right angles to the slope, c. establish adapted species
from Table 1 below, d. apply seed uniformly to the rate indicated by broadcasting or hydraulic application, and
a. cover seed with mulch as needed.
Permanent Stabilization -To reduce damages from sediment and runoff to downstream areas, and to avoid
erosion on the site itself, a permanent type cover shall be established as soon as possible. Seeding
herbaceous cover is usually the most economical and practical way to stabilize any large area. On this site a
permanent cover utilizing standard commercial seed mixes containing species similar to Mixtures#3,#4, and
#7 is appropriate. Sod or erosion control blanket infused with one of the aforementioned seed mixtures may
be installed as permanent cover on the site at the Owners discretion (See Table 2).
MIXTURE NO. I -Dry to Very Dry Sites
Switchgrass-20 lbs. (Blackwell or Nebraska 28)
Redtop -3 lbs; or Annual Ryegrass- 15 lbs.
Switchgrass seed requires a chilling period of three (3)weeks or longer at common household refrigerator
temperatures, except when seeded in late fall or winter. Regular mowing should not be practiced. Very slow
growing the first year.
MIXTURE NO. 2 -Dry to Very Dry Sites
Weeping Lovegrass -5 lbs.
Cape and the Islands only. May be killed by severe winters, and should not be seeded where regular mowing
will be practiced. Spring seeding only between April 15 and May 15. Should not be used for sand dune
stabilization.
MIXTURE NO. 3 -Moderately Moist to Dry Sites
Red fescue-30 lbs.
Redtop -3 lbs.; or Perennial Ryegrass - 15 lbs.
Resistant to foot traffic. Tolerant of shade. Good for lawn type cover.
MIXTURE NO.4-Moderately Moist to Very Dry Sites
Tall fescue-40 lbs.
Redtop-3 lbs.; or Perennial Ryegrass - 15 lbs.
Resistant to foot traffic when well established. Tolerant of shade.
MIXTURE NO. 6-Very Moist to Dry Sites
Reed canarygrass -20 lbs.
Redtop -3 lbs.; or Perennial Ryegrass - 15 lbs.
On moist and very moist sites, reed canarygrass can be established quicker by planting rootstocks.
MIXTURE NO. 6-Moderately Moist to Dry Sites
Crown vetch - 15.lbs.
Redtop -3 lbs.; or Perennial Ryegrass - 15 lbs.
Crown vetch should not be seeded as the basic species where regular mowing will be practiced. Spring
seeding is preferred.
MIXTURE NO. 7 -Moderately Moist to Dry Sites
Standard commercial grass or grass-legume mixtures used for lawns or long-term forage crop production.
Mixtures should contain at least 75% perennial grasses or legumes. Annual fertilization should be planned.
MIXTURE NO. 8 -Moderately Moist Sites
Kentucky Bluegrass -20 lbs.
Redtop-2 lbs.; or Perennial Ryegrass - 15 lbs.
Only for high-fertility sites, usually four(4") inches or more topsoil. Good for lawn-type cover.
MIXTURE NO.9 -Moderately Moist to Very Dry Sites
Sericea Lespedeza -20 lbs.
Redtop -2 lbs.; or Perennial Ryegrass - 15 lbs.
Cape and the Islands only, and seeded only in the spring. Should not be seeded where regular mowing will
be practiced.
REFERENCE
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1977. Guidelines for Soil and Water
Conservation in Urbanizing Areas of Massachusetts. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Amherst,
Massachusetts, 88 pages.
Co
�.T' 0
WrIla Z
Slit Fencing -shall be installed as shown on the approved NO] Plan to help prevent erosion and
sedimentation of the downstream wetland resources identified on the project.
Catch Basins -shall be fitted with filter fabric during construction to prevent the accumulation of sediments in
the catch basin sump.,Catch Basin is to be cleaned as specified in the Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan.
The stormwater runoff shall be managed through the use of several best management practices:
1. Deep Sump Catch Basins w/hood
2. Oil &Sediment Separator Units
3. Detention Basins
4. Subsurface Infiltration Structure
Waste Materials: All waste materials shall be collected and stored in secure metal dumpsters rented from a
licensed solid waste management company in Massachusetts. The dumpsters shall meet all local and state
solid waste management regulations as outlined in 310 CIVIR 19.00. All trash and construction debris
generated on site shall be disposed of in the dumpsters. The dumpsters shall be emptied as often as
necessary during construction and transferred to an approved solid waste facility licensed to accept municipal
solid waste and/or construction and demolition debris. No construction waste shall be buried on site. All
personnel shall be instructed regarding the correct procedure for waste disposal.
Hazardous Waste: All hazardous waste materials shall be disposed of in a manner specified by local or
State regulation or by the manufacturer. Site personnel shall be instructed in these practices.
Sanitary Waste: All sanitary shall be collected from portable units, as needed, by a licensed septage hauler
in Massachusetts, in accordance with the requirements of the local Board of Health.
0 . �44���::ER"TROLSJCOntli Uedlll—
ffs-iteVehicleT
jaddnW _4
Construction entrance and exit shall be via Clark Avenue.
MWURE
As indicated in the Sequence of Major Activities, the installation of erosion and sediment control devices shall
be in place prior to earth excavating activities.
N$p Rl,9#PPKO DERA1!XOTA:TE,"P TO
W-J !EGULA 4 N
OMP
,JAA,, P_EV
The stormwater pollution prevention plan reflects the requirements of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection
Act(MGL c.131, section 40). There is nowetland filling associated with this project. It is strictly a buffer zone
project. Note that there are no other applicable State or Federal requirements for sediment and erosion
control plans(or permits), or stormwater management plans (or permits) required for this project to the best of
our knowledge.
r V.– --0.0doft—Odift 'k—', TZ
The following items represent the inspection and maintenance practices that will be used to maintain sediment
and erosion control for"The Woodlands"subdivision project.
1. All control measures shall be inspected at least once every fourteen (14)days and following any storm event
of 0.5 inches or greater.
2. All measures shall be maintained in good working order; if a repair is necessary, it shall be initiated within 24
hours of the report.
3. Built up sediment shall be removed from sift fencing when it has reached one-third the height of the fence.
4. Sift fence shall be inspected for depth of sediment,tears,to see if the fabric is securely attached to the fence
posts, and to see that the fence posts are firmly set in the ground.
6. The catch basin grates shall be inspected for grate elevation relative to current surface condition; condition
of filter fabric, and degree to which sediment has accumulated on the grate and in the sump of the catch basin.
X- ded)
I-ONUM W#ftd'ftd-Uftw6fit, bok A Rdiftfl onfloOd
jj� "I
7. Temporary and permanent seeding and any plantings shall be inspected for bare spots, washouts, and
healthy growth.
8. A maintenance inspection report shall be prepared following each inspection. A copy of the report form to
be completed by the inspector is attached to the LTPPP.
9. NSD Realty Trust shall select three individuals who will be responsible for inspections, maintenance and
repair activities as well as who shall be responsible for filling out the inspection and maintenance report.
10, Personnel selected for inspection and maintenance responsibilities shall receive training from NSD Realty
Trust or their designated representative. They will be trained in all the inspection and maintenance practices
necessary for keeping the erosion and sediment control devices used on site in good working order.
It is expected that the following non-stormwater discharges will occur from the site during the construction
period:
1. Water from water line flushing.
2. Pavement wash waters.
All non-stormwater discharges shall be directed to the proposed site BMPs prior to discharge.
X T] NT-RIEVENT110"
The materials or substances listed below are expected to be present on site during construction:
x Concrete x Fertilizers
x Wood x Petroleum Based Products
x Structural Steel x Cleaning Solvents
x Masonry Block x Paints (enamel and latex)
x Othe Building Materials x Tar
x Fiber Glass Insulation x Waterproofing Materials
E I
0 1 U A ON M- -*0 Big 1-6"N W ZNS*0*003051-4-5 9 M
The following are the material management practices'that shall be used to reduce the risk of spills
or other accidental exposure of materials and substances to stormwater runoff.
The following good housekeeping practices will be followed on site during the construction project.
1. A concerted effort shall be made to store only enough product required to complete a particular task.
2. All materials stored on site shall be stored in a neat and orderly fashion in their appropriate containers and,
if possible, under a roof or other secure enclosure.
3. Products shall be kept in their original containers with the original manufacturers label.
4. Substances shall not be mixed with one another unless recommended by the manufacturer.
5. Whenever possible, all of a product shall be used up before disposing of the container.
6. Manufacturers recommendations for proper use and disposal shall be followed.
7. The site superintendent shall inspect daily to ensure proper use and disposal of materials on site.
The following practices are intended to reduce the risks associated with hazardous materials.
1. Products shall be kept in original containers unless they are not resealable.
2. Where feasible, the original labels and material safety data shall be retained, whereas they contain
important product information.
3. If surplus product must be disposed, follow manufacturer's or local and State recommended methods for
proper disposal.
�MIEY T-J 0 N Jqgnt!p ued)
The following product specific practices shall be followed on site:
All on site vehicles shall be monitored for leaks and receive regular preventative maintenance to reduce the
risk of leakage, Petroleum products shall be stored in tightly sealed containers which are clearly labeled, Any
bituminous concrete or asphalt substances used on site shall be applied according to the manufacturers
recommendations.
Fa-0 Re!
Fertilizers shall be applied in the minimum amounts recommended by the manufacturer. Once applied,
fertilizers shall be worked into the soil to limit exposure to stormwater. Storage shall be in a covered shed or
trailer. The contents of any partially used bags of fertilizers shall be transferred to a sealable plastic bag or bin
to avoid spills.
OR '400
All containers shall be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. Excess paint shall not be discharged
into any catch basin, drain manhole, or any portion of the stormwater management system. Excess paint shall
be properly disposed of according to manufacturer's recommendations or State and local regulations.
Concrete trucks shall not be allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete or drum wash water on site.
In addition to the good housekeeping and material management practices discussed in the previous sections of
this plan, the following practices shall be followed for spill prevention and cleanup:
1. Manufacturer's recommended methods for cleanup shall be readily available at the on site trailer and site
personnel shall be made aware of the procedures and the location of the information.
2. Materials and equipment necessary for spill cleanup shall be kept in the material storage area on site.
Equipment and materials shall include, but not be limited to brooms,dust pans, mops, rags, gloves, goggles,
kitty litter, sand, sawdust, and plastic and metal trash containers specifically for this purpose.
3. All spills shall be cleaned up immediately after discovery.
4. The spill area shall be kept well ventilated and personnel shall wear appropriate protective clothing to
prevent injury from contact with a hazardous substance.
5. Spills of toxic or hazardous material shall be reported to the appropriate State and/or local authority in
accordance with local and/or State regulations.
6. The spill prevention plan shall be adjusted to include measures to prevent a particular type of spill from
reoccurring and how to clean up the spill if there is another occurrence. A descrip�ion of the spill, what caused
it, and the clean up measures shall also be included.
7. NSD Realty Trust or their assigned designee shall be the spill prevention and cleanup coordinator. NSD
Realty Trust shall designate at least three other site personnel who will be trained in the spill control practices
identified above.
'30 TIAINIC T�
. ,.,ERTFICA
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all its attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based
on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine
and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Signed:
Nick Meninno
NSD Realty Trust
Date:
The Woodlands (Clark Avenue)
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 14 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF
A RAINFALL EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER
Inspector: Date:
Inspector's Title:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
Structural Controls: Slit Fencing
Average Are F:nce ?
)s
Depth of Tearsi sts S cure Overall
Pc
From To Sed' (yes/no) Condition
poor
yes - no yes - no fair
good
poor
yes - no yes - no fair
good
poor
yes - no yes - no fair
good
poor
yes - no yes - no fair
good
po r
yes - no yes - no fa?ir
Maintenance Required: good
To Be Performed By: —On or Before:
The Woodlands (Clark Avenue)
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 14 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF
A RAINFALL EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER
Inspector: Date:
Inspector's Title:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
Structural Controls: Existing Catch Basins and Grates
Is Catch Basin Is Filter Fabric Sediment Buildup Sediment Buildup
Grate to Grade in Place on Grate and Fabric in CB Sump
Location (yes (yes or no) (minor/modera (0- 100%)
yes no yes — no (minor/moderate/major)
yes no yes — no (minor/moderate/m2i2q
yes no yes — no (minor/moderate/major)
yes no yes — no (minor/mode e/major)
yes no yes no (minor/moderate/major)
yes — no yes no (minor/moderate I major)
yes — no yes no (minor/moderate I ma'or
yes — no yes no (minor/modera /major)l
Maintenance Required:
To Be Performed By: —On or Before:
The Woodlands (Clark Avenue)
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 14 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF
A RAINFALL EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER
Inspector: Date:
Inspector's Title:
Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall:
Detention Basins
Condition of Condition of How Much
Forebay Forebay Sediment Buildup
Description Side Slopes Side Slopes Circle one
minor/moderate / major
minor/moderate/major
minor/ moderate/major
minor/ moderate /major
minor/ moderate / major
Maintenance Required:
To Be Performed By: On or Before:
The Woodlands (Clark Avenue)
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (CPPPP)
I INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM
CHANGES REQUIRED TO THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN:
REASONS FOR CHANGES:
I certify under penalty of law that the above changes to the document and all its attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted- Based on my inquiry
of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering
the information,the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
SIGNATURE -dATE
Project No. SALE-0026
Applicant:
NSD Realty Trust
76 Oakville Street
Lynn, MA 01905
Mitigative Drainage Analysis
"The Woodlands,"
Proposed Cluster
Residential Subdivision
Clark Avenue
Salem, Massachusetts
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
-W,CC
WILLIAMS
SPARAGES
T
S
189 North Main Street,Suite 101
Middleton,MA 01949
978-539-8088 Ph
978-539-8200 Fax
www.wsengintgrs.com
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Purpose:
The purpose of this analysis is to compare the present or existing conditions and the post.-
development or proposed watershed conditions for the proposed cluster residential subdivision by
analyzing the surface runoff rates to the limit of the watershed analysis shown on the accompanying
watershed maps. The results of which are presented on the summary tables that follow in order to
comply with the requirements of the Salem Massachusetts Subdivision Regulations as well as the
Massachusetts Department of Envirorunental Protection(DEP) ten (10) Standards.
Introduction:
The project is located on an presently vacant property (there is evidence of an old foundation on top
of the W11)with an address of Clark Avenue in the City of Salem. The project is bounded to the
north by residential properties located off of Clark Street, to the east by property owned now or
formerly (n/f) by the City of Salem and to the south by properties located off of Wyman Place and
n/f Lynn Sand&Stone Company located off of Robinson Road.
The proposal is to build two roadways,the first is a one thousand and eighty-nine (1089.03') shown
on the plans as"Woodlands Road", the second is a two hundred ninety-nine (298.99) shown on the
plans as"South Ridge Circle". in order to provide access to a twenty-seven lot cluster subdivision.
Lots 1 through 26 are in the R1 Zone and will be a cluster residential subdivision,Lot 27 ties in both
the R1 and I zones is not showing any development at this time on the proposed plans. The
construction of-the dwellings and roadway will.include paved driveways,lawn,landscaping,sewer,
drainage,storinwater detention basins,a subsurface infiltration area,water services and other
various utilities.
It should be noted that there are wetland resource areas located on the subject property and we are
proposing activities within the one-hundred (100')buffer zone to the edge of bordering vegetated
wetlands. Therefore,a Notice of hitent(NO4 filing will be filed with the Salem Conservation
Commission at a later date.
Existing Condition Soils Analysis:
In order to model the runoff parameters for both the existing and proposed watershed parameters,
the parent soils on site were mapped using the Web Soil Survey (WSS) made available on the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) website.
The WSS provides vital soil data and information such as Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG)which is
then input into a mathematical model to generate runoff curve numbers.
The user inputs the soil cover type as well as the hydrologic soil group to generate a weighted curve
number (CN) and also uses the topography of the land-to generate a time of concentration(Tc) from
wl-dch the stormwater runoff rate as well as volume may be calculated for a certain watershed for
comparison. The soils present on site are comprised of Udorthents,smoothed and does not have a
rating for its HSG with the NRCS.
2
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
The NRCS lists the majority of this property as being Chatfield-Hollis-Rock Outcrop Complex with
hydrologic soil group B&C/D and a small portion on the southerly side as Whitman Loam with
hydrologic soil group D. In order to be consistent with the previously approved drainage analysis
by Eastern Land Survey,we have assumed that the hydrologic soil group for the property is!�C".
We have also assumed that the Emit of the hydrologic soil group"D" soils is coincident with the
edge of bordering vegetated wetlands as shown on the accompanying watershed and soils maps.
For the proposed subsurface infiltration pond and the surface detention ponds we have assumed a
design infiltration rate of 0.27 in/hr. for"C" soils as found in the Hydrology Handbook for
Conservation Commissioners, March 2002 Table 2-1.
Stormwater Modeling Methodology:
The mathematical model used in d-ds analysis was provided using the HydroCAD Version 10.0
developed by HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC. HydroCAD is a program that is used to model
the hydrology and hydraulics of stormwater runoff and is based largely on programs and
techniques developed by NRCS,specifically TR-20 and TR-55 as well as other hydraulic calculation
methods.
HydroCAD allows the user,for a given rainfall event,to generat e runoff hydrographs for single or
multiple watersheds and is used to determine if a given drainage system is adequate under the
desired conditions as well as to predict flooding or other impacts at specified locations such as
erosion.
Three (3) design storm events were analyzed and the results presented in the tables that follow for
the two (2) year,ten(10)year,and one-hundred(100) year storm events for comparison.
Existing Condition Watershed:
The lin-dt of the watershed analysis has been delineated along the existing property lines and edge of
bordering vegetated wetlands including the up gradient areas tributary thereto for comparison with
the proposed condition as can be seen on the accompanying watershed maps.
Using the methods described in the stormwater modeling explanation above,runoff curve numbers
and times of concentration were generated for each watershed for the existing condition to be used
for comparison with the proposed condition described below. A schematic of the mathematical
model as well as the results of the calculations for the 2 year,10 year and 100 year,Type III,24-hour
storm events are included in this report.
3
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Proposed Condition Watershed:
The proposed development requires the construction of four (4) surface detention ponds and a
subsurface infiltration pond to provide peak rate of runoff mitigation as well as groundwater
recharge opportunities in the volume provided below the pond outlets. However,because the
property has a lot of ledge and shallow to ledge areas,it is our opinion that there is not a lot of
infiltration occurring in the exiting condition on site but is mostly shedding off.
Runoff from the roadway, driveways and some of the roof areas will be collected using deep-sump
catch basins with hoods from the paved surfaces and piped directly into the proposed storrawater
management areas,see plan for locations. Three-quarters (3/4) of the proposed roof area on Lot 12
will be directly discharged to the proposed subsurface infiltration system shown on the plans. The
remaining roof areas will discharge to the ground and then discharge overland or be infiltrated into
the ground surface.
Pretreatment for the subsurface infiltration system will be through the use of the deep-sump catch
basins,with hoods and 1,500 gallon sediment&oil separator unit. The remaining stormwater
management areas will receive pretreatment from deep-sump catch basins and sediment forebays
with overflow spillways.
The subsurface infiltration structure will be comprised of Cultec 330XL XD Heavy Duty Recharger
units (or approved equivalent) connected together with internal manifolds and inspection ports
brought to finish grade for maintenance and inspection. The structure will sit on a 6" crushed stone
bed,have a 12" crushed stone border and will have a 6" crushed stone cover layer for additional
storage volume.
There are two (2) existing isolated wetlands that exist on the parcel shown as Lot 27 on the proposed
subdivision plans. Although there is no proposed disturbance for these wetlands,the tributary area
shown for EX-4R, the wetland higher on the slope,will have an increase in the amount of flow
tributary to it as shown on the accompanying watershed maps. However,this is a non-jurisdictional
wetland and it is our position that there will be no adverse impact due to the proposed construction
activities.
Using the methods described above,runoff curve numbers and times of concentration were
generated for each watershed for the existing condition to be used for comparison with the
proposed condition described below. A schematic of the mathematical model as well as the results
of the calculations for the 2 year,10 year and 100 year,Type III,24-hour storm events are included mi
this report.
Conclusion:
As can be seen by examining the following summary &performance tables, the proposed
stormwater management system is effective for mitigating the peak flow rates of runoff from the
limit of the watershed analysis for the 2, 10&100 year storm events.
4
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Comparison Table
Total Peak Rate of Runoff leaving project area
Description 24 hour Type Existing Proposed
III Condition Condition
Storm Event Peak Rate of Peak Rate of
(year) Runoff Runoff
Q cfs.
Flow towards 2 (il inch) 5.1 4.6
Clarke Ave. 10 (4.5 inch) 9.7 8.1
Link 132L 100 (6.5 inch) 170 13.3
Flow towards 2(3.1 inch) Z6 6.9
thesouthern 10 (4.5 inch) 16.5 14.8
wetlands 100(6.5 inch) 31.0 27.4
Link 139L
Flow towards 2 (3.1 inch) 4.8 4.5
the northern 10(4.5 inch) 11.3 9.0
wetlands 100 (6.5 inch) 22.2 16.6
Link 128L
Total flow 2(3.1 inch) 12.1 10.9
discharging 16 (4.5 inch) 27.5 23.3
from project 100 (6.5 inch) 52.8 42.9
area
Link 109L
5
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
I"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Comparison Table
Total Peak Rate tributaly to non-jurisdictional Isolated Wetlands
Description 24 hour Type Existing Proposed
III Condition Condition
Storm Event Peak Rate of Peak Rate of
(year) Runoff Runoff
(Q) cfs. (Q) cfs.
Flow towards 2(3.1 inch) 0.7 1.2
"B" Series 10 (4.5 inch) 1.7 2.6
Wetlands 100 (6.5 inch) 3.3 5.0
Link 130L
Flow towards 2(3.1 inch) 0.7 0.7
"C" Series 10 (4.5 inch) 1.7 1.7
Wetlands 100 (6.5 inch) 3.5 3.5
Link 141L
——----------
6
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Pr oposed Subsurface Infiltration Area 1!ydroCAD Pond 78P
(40) Cultec Recharger 330XL HD Units-7 rows of 7 units
Top of Stone=125.94 (25.67x58.00')
Top of Chambers=125.44
IT' Inv. In=124.33
Bottom of Chambers=l??.90
Bottom of 6" Stone bed=122.40
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
(Qout)cfs.
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of
Storm Event Runoff In *Infiltration Overflow Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin) cfs. (Discarded) though Outflow Level (W.L.) ft.
CB rim
2 0.7 0.01 0.0 6.01 124.00
10 1.2 0.01 0.0 0.01 125.56
100 1;9 0.01 0.69 0.70 �127.91
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group "C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Commissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
**This system is designed to accept,store and infiltrate the 2&the 10 year storm events. Should the
system become surcharged,for example,in the 100 year storm, the gutter flow in the proposed
roadway will bypass the proposed catch basins located at the entrance and flow directly to the
existing catch basin located on Clark Avenue Extension. The proposed catch basin located at
station 0+0 Right will act as a secondary outlet and has been modeled as a weir with overflow
adding to the Clark Avenue Extension drainage system.
The peak water level calculated will be lower than the proposed cellar floor grade for the house
located on Lot 12,therefore,okay.
7
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Detention Pond 1 ilydroCAD Pond 142P
Top of Berm=136.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=132.0 Rim=136.50
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=136.00 18" Pipe level @ 132.50
12" RCP FES Inv. hi=132.90 (From Road A) 4" Orifice @ 132.50
8" Orifice @ 134.00
10" Orifice @ 134.50
12" RCP hiv. Out=131.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
(Qout) cfs.
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of
Storm Event Runoff In *Infiltration 12" 8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin)cfs. (Discarded) �RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.) ft.
- Spillway.
2 2.0 0.01 0.49 0.0 0.50 134.10
10 3.8 0.01 1.82 0.0 1.83 134.73
100 6.6 0.02 4.05 0.0 4.07 135.34
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group "C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Commissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
8
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Detention Pond 2 HydroCAD Pond 143P
Top of Berm=132.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=128.5 Rim=132.50
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=132.00 18" Pipe level @ 128.50
1T' RCP FES Inv. In=133.00 (FromRoadA) 2.5" Orifice @ 128.50
12" RCP hiv. Out=127.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
24 hour T I ype III Peak Rate of (Qout)cfs.
Storm Event Runoff hi *Infiltration 12" 8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin) cfs. (Discarded) RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.) ft.
i way
2 2.0 0.02 0.14 0.0 0.16 129.30
10 3.4 0.02 0.20 0.0 0.22 130.12
100 5.5 0.03 0.26 0.0 0.29 131.20'
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C" found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Commissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
9
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Detention Pond 3 MdroCAD Pond 152P
Top of Berm=118.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=115.0 Rim=118.5
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=118.0 18" Pipe level @ 115.50
12" RCP FES Inv. hi=126.50 (Into Sediment Forebay) 8" Orifice @ 115.50
12" RCP Inv. Out=113.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
(Qout)cfs.
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of
Storm Event Runoff In *Infiltration 12" 8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin) cfs. (Discarded) RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.)ft.
Spillway
2 2.3 0.02 0.79 0.0 0.81 116.06
10 4.0 0.02 1.48 0.0 1.50 116.60
100 6.6 0.02 2.07 0.0 2.10 117.35
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C"found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Commissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
10
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
"The Woodlands", Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Detention Pond 4 HydroCAD Pond 144P
Top of Berm=122.5 Proposed Outlet Control Structure
Bottom of Berm=117.0 Rim=122.5
8'L Emergency Stone Spillway=122.0 18" Pipe level @ 117.50
12" RCP FES hiv. ln=122.00 (From Road A) 6" Orifice @ 117.50
8" Orifice @ 120.50
12" RCP hiv. Out--114.50
Peak Rate of Runoff Out
(Qout) cfs.
24 hour Type III Peak Rate of
Storm Event Runoff In. *Infiltration 12" 8'L Total Peak Water
(YR) (Qin) cfs. (Discarded)- RCP Stone Outflow Level (W.L.) ft.
Sp ay
2 3.3 0.01 1.21 0.0 1.22 119.39
10 5.6 0.02 1.54 0.0 1.56 120.42
100 8.8 0.02 2.99 0.0 3.01 121.34
Calculated infiltration rate and peak water levels are based upon a rate 0.27 inches per hour for
hydrologic soil group"C"found in the Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Cornmissioners,
March 2002 Table 2-1.
Existing Condition
Watershed Analysis
all
sill
lift
oll
OH
a-OR
'a-ate
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/nD6611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area CN Description
(sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers)
766,991 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (11 IS, 136S, 137S. 138S, 140S)
7,317 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C (I 42S)
74,137 81 1/3 acre lots, 30%imp, HSG C (142S, 143S)
24,065 98 Paved parking, HSG C (142S)
872,510 TOTAL AREA
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal
Prepared by Microsoft Printed .8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 3
SoR Listing (all nodes)
Area Soil Subcatchment
(sq-ft) Group Numbers
0 HSG A
0 HSG B
872,610 HSG C 111S, 136S, 137S, 138S, 140S, 142S, 143S
0 HSG D
0 Other
872.510 TOTAL AREA
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 stn06611 02010 HydroCAD Software solutions LLC Pace 4
Time span=0.00-40.00 hr.s, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcat 6hment 111 S: EX-1 Runoff Area=318,326 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77'
Flow Length=430' Tc=13.4 min CN=70 Runoff=4.53 ds 20,440 cf
Subcatchment 136S: EX-41 , Runoff Area=49,366 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=420' Tc=14.2 min CN=70 Runoff=0.69 ds 3,170 ef
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2 Runoff Area=127,758 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Longth=475' Tc--1 5.6 min CN=70 Runoff=1.71 ds 8.203 af
Subcatchment 1385: EX-3 Runoff Area=221,679 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77*
FlowLength=470' Tc=11.9min CN=70 Runoff=3.27ds 14,234cf
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.77"
Flow Length=560' Tc=12.3 min CN=70 Runoff=0.73cfs 3,20
Subcatchment 142S: EX-RES I Runoff Area--93,234sf 45.71% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
FlowLength=300' Tc=5.Omin CN=85 Runoff=4.20ds 12,995cf
I
Subcatchment 143S: EX-RES 2 Runoff Area=12,285 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.39"
FlowLength=105' Tc--5.Omin CN=81 Runoff=0.46ds 1,424cf
Link 1091.: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflovr-1 2.10 ds 57,296 d
Primary--12.10cfs 57,296d
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow-4.78 cis 21,864 cf
Primary=4.78 efs 21,864 d
Link 13OL: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B" series Inflow--0.69 ds 3,170 cf
Primary--0.69 efs; 3,170 cf
Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue Inflow-5.09 cis 21,199 Cf
Primary--5.09 ds 21,199 cf
Link 139L: Runoff towards e)dsting wetlands to the south Inflow--7.62 cfs 35,433 d
Primary--7.62 ds 35,433 cf
Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series Inflow-0.73 cfs 3,202 d
Primary--0.73 ds 3,202 d
Total Runoff Area=872,510sf Runoff Volume=63,668 cf Average Runoff Depth =0.88"
94.69% Pervious=826,204sf 5.31%Impervious=46,306 sf
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 Yr Rainfall=a 10 a
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Summary for Subcatchment 11IS: EX-I
Runoff 4.53 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 20,440 cf. Depth= 0.77-
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 Ow
Area (sf) CN Description
318,326 70 Woods, Good; HSG C
318,326 100.00% Pervious Area
Te Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ftfft) (ft1sec) (cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.9 330 0.1500 6.24 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
13.4 430 Total
Subcatchment I I IS: EX-1
Hydrograph
- -------------- ----------- --------- ---------
5.
T
YO
24-ht Zyt
4- '
ftiffalli--39 10
R6111' 6ff'Ar.e4-31 8 '326:Sf
4---
—---I—---I---I-----------
3- ---------------------- ------
R0111off V0010 M- 6#2%440 r
ROh6ff;OOPth-0 77"'
W.
rig
I...---1-7---:---. -------------
2- '
-3.4 Mih';
------ ---- ------------ ---------
CN#70
0-
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 V 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.Ion
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Summary for Subcatchment 136S: EX-4
Runoff 0.69 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 3,170 cf, Depth"- 0.77"
Runoff by-SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area(sf) CN Description
49,366 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
49,366 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft1ft) (fttsec) (cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.3 220 0.0300 2.79 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
14.2 420 Total Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
Subcatchment 136S: EX-4
Hydrograph
;�_;_-------- ------i--- 7_7------ ------------
0.75- FIRIUn—off i
------------ ------ ------------- - ------
O.T
........ .....
-it 2 1hin 2
1 4- lyt
0.65-
O.r�
...RWhfalli
1--:RqiIiilOffAr63*49 ; 6610
O.S.
_ff V
'17
0.45- Ft
A_ _f
0.4-
_-A-060
ff-Veplth#0477!!�
0.35-
-------- --
fthii420
0.3- f fdWLe
------- -------
0.25- . . . . . .
------- T_G#14�2
0.
0.15
A-------------- ------- ------- .......
0.1
0..
n ...................................... .........................................
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141616171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
'nm (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8118/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 7
Summary for Subcatchment 137S: EX-2
Runoff 1.71 efs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 8,203 cf, Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
127,758 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
127,758 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (fttft) (ftfsec) (cfs)
14.1 100 0.0600 0.12 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.3 90 0.1300 5.80 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.2 285 0.0600 3.94 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
15.6 475 Total
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2
Hydrograph
FN-FZn-o-ffj
T.Yp,01,41:2 br2:Yr
. . . . . . 1 : R 'u 'n 'off::Ar'e�ai=127 '7',,5'8's�f
'63i
d vini IF
�2,
WWOOPth"O'77":
n
i F16vVLeh4th ' 475';
6=45.6 ;m: !n; ;
CN=M
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 li 13 1'4 Ili is 1'7'1'8 IV i�.2..1-'2'2-.2.'3.-2.'4.25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Clark Avenue, Salem MA
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10ff
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8118/2016
HydroCADO 9.10 s1n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8
Summary for Subcatchment 138S: EX-3
Runoff 3.27 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 14,234 cL Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area(sf) CN Description
221,679 . 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
221,679 100.00% Pervious Area
Te Length Slope Velocity Capacity. Description
(min) (feet) (fttft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
10.7 100 0.1200 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.8 275 0.1300 5.80 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.4 95 0.0500 3.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
UnDaved
11.9 470 Total
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3
Hydmgraph
FN—RU—W—ff j
-------------------- ----------
.1; -2
'T . 4-h
'Y
3-
qJ n
AbhWAill4a�-2210:679:
------ -- loilb -141-2340-
2-
6 DOW=0,77"!
'ftn ff
F16WL6.6 'th"4701;
'g
.. ... .. jyl J-
t t
4
CN=M
: 01
.............1-1 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7.8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiffal Type N 24-17r 2 yr Rainlall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9
Summary for Subcatchment 14OS: E.X-5
Runoff 0.73 al's @ 12.20 hrs. Volume= 3,202 cf, Depth= 0.77'
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS. Time Span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
49,862 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
49,862 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ftift) (ftisec) WS)
10.0 1100 0.1400 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Ught underbrush n= 0.400 P2=3.10"
0.3 100 0.1400 6.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.0 360 0.0360 3.05 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
12.3 560 Total
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5
Hydrograph
0.8.
-------------- ......
0.7-
Ify
........ -----T-------------7—L -11-A--- -'P ---------- ---------------
0.65-
0.6- ' --Rialn
O.W Rtin6ft'Are&:4 is
------ ------ ------ -------- ------- ------Z-if-
Uin�� '20,
- __v
0.45
R noff
------ 771
0.4- ;
L-LiJ---------:- -tb 0-�
P
rL 0.3&
1-f f6 1-bin th*56Wi--
0.3�
-------------- -7- f--i--- - -----
0.25�. . .. . . .
-MIA
0.2- '
0.1 C-N#70;
------------ . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.1
if if
i ..f 4
0.05
I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 II)III2131415161718192021222324252627�i293O3l323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
e)dsting-submiffal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rairitafl=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10
Summary for Subcatchment 142S: EX-RES I
[49] Hint:Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 4.20 cis @ 12.08 hrs, Volurne= 12,995 cf, Depth= 1.67-
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area(sf) CN Description
61,852 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
24,065 98 Paved parking, HSG C
7,317 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
93,234 85 Weighted Average
50,613 54.29% Pervious Area
42.621 45.71% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n=0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1000 5.09 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.2 150 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
5.0 300 Total
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submiffal Type N 24-hr 2),T Rainfall=3.10ff
PrePared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 sIn 06611 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Subcatchnnent 142S: EX-RES I
Hydrograph
4- TITj;P'd-1:IIt:24�V2;
:yr,
R61hfpIIt--3'fQ"
----------- ------ �2
�R-urk ff-i'Area.' 103 -34,4f
3
K ;R "Csff
I.Vp,.IUr,0D",12i:99 5: ef
4
3
U
"-0
-qp------4p
2- . . . . . . .
F1dWIOh &-300w;
T, S. ; h1lih'
- ----------------------------
------------- ------
CN=05
o ....... ................ NNW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rain/611=3.100
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/1812015
HydroCAD@9.10 s/nO6611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 12
Summary for Subcatchment 143S: EX-RES 2
[491 Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.46 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,424 cf, Depth= 1.39"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
12,285 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% 1 p, HSG C
8,600 70.00% Pervious Area
3,686 30.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft1ft) (ft/sec) (Cfs)
4.3 50 0.0400 0.19 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=3.10"
0.4 55 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.7. 105 Total, Increased to minimum Tc=5.0 min
Subcatchment 143S: EX-RES 2
Hydrograph
q-------
0.5
-------- Fm ftnoffi
0.48 ---------- -4-4-- -4----------4--�--------- --------4--
0.46 ------------------------4-------
0.44 TIT
. : . : — -4 : wp. . I . . I :
0.42- --- ----- ......I ------__-------------- -
0.4 ......... ---L--i---I -� 7 --
------- ---- I I
: 1 . . Rialnfafli=340"'
---------- : ! : : : : I .
0.38- ------ ------I------
0.36, .......
off
-S
0.34- ------ --------------- . . I .. . � I I . . I . : � . . I . I , - f
0.32 ------- --- . . . . . . . % : ;
--------- -- --
0.3 ------- --------�"-KOTIIW VOIUMIO:
0.2& ----------- -- -- -- --
0.26 ------
0.24 ------ --------- ........Rt
E 0.22-
W
0.2 -- --- --�--F16 U-64th -----
0.18. -------- ------- -------------------- ------
10 Willi;
Td wS.
. 0.16-
0.1
4
0.12
...... �CWM----
0.1 Z-:- ------
0.. ------ --- ........ ------- ------------ --------
0..
04
0.02
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 26 26 27 28 29 30 3132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Tim (houn)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr,Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft I Printed 8118/2015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 @201OHydroCADSoft�vareSolubonsLLC Pa-ge 13
Summary for Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area
Inflow Area 773,282 sf, 5.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.89" for 2 yr event
Inflow 12.10cfs@ 12.18hrs, Volume= 57,296 cf .
Primary 12.10 cis @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 57,296 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag=0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area
Hydrograph
FE Infio-
13 ------------- ------- -------- ------- I M Primmy I
12
-f--:
$
----------- -- .......
10. ---------------- ------- ------ 7-1-----------------
91 ' ---------
7- --------
6� ------
.............. ------ 7-7- 7-------- -
............ --------- --- --
4: ,. ------
--------7-1-7-7-7------r--7-------
3
2 . . . . . . .
0 1 2 3 4 i fO11 121314151617181920212223i42�iB2�i82�i0iI 3ijj�43'53�jjjjjjWo
Tinwe (hours)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type I//24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions ILILC Page 14
Summary for Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Inflow Area 330,611 sf, 1.11% Impervious, Infrow Depth = 0.79H for 2 yr event
Inflow 4.78 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 21,864 cf
Primary 4.78 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 21,864 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs;
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Hydrograph
-------�-4------ ---------- ---------- ---- Fm lnftw
E Nmary
6-
:$
;�0�330 6
low: re
T ----77-----
-- -- ------
---------- ----------- ------
3
4- ....... -- -----
2- ' . . . . . . .
---------- ------------
0.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111'2i'3141�1'61'ilili202l22232.4 2 1 52.62.72.82.93.0313 1 23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.0
Tim (hours)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type ///24-hr 2 yr.Rainfall=3.10n,
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 @ 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16
Summary for Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series
Inflow Area 49,366 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.77" for 2 yr event
Inflow 0.69 efs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 3,170 cf
Primary 0.69 efs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 3,170 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series
Hydrograph
4--4--- ------ - ------------- ............-1----------
n—flm
4- -------- -- -- -- N Primry
0.75
..........- -
0.7
'R---Ilk .
0.65.
------------- -- ---------- ------------ 1—-------- --
0.6. -
-------------------
0165 . . . . . .
--------- ----- ------ -- ----
0.5.
---------- --------- -------i------
0.45- . . . . . .
-----------4-------------4--i--�-------q-------
0.4.
0.35. ----------
0.3-
----------
0.25�
0.2- . I . . . . .
Y T
0.1
0.05
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 io�qjjyjjr 15 1 6 171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis -Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=;3.I off
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/1812015
HydroCAD09.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16
Summary for Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue
Inflow Area 220,992 sf, 19.29% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.15" for 2 yr event
Inflow 5.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 21,199 cf
Primary 5.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 21,199 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt"- 0.05 hrs
Link 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue
Hydrograph
Fo—infl-o-w-k
10 Primry
----------- --------- ---------------
'0022-90 99: sf i
Ar
nf i ,
low
---------- ...... ------ -------------
4
------------ ------- ------- ---- ---- ------------------------
3-
2- 1
I I I
+-
0 ..................
0 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tfm (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.low
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/1812015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/nO6611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions ILLC Page 17
Summary for Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Inflow Area 442,671 sf, 9.63% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.96" for 2 yr event
Inflow 7.62 cis @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 35,433 cf
Primary 7.62 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 35,433 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Hydrograph
--- ------------- -
��44: 2-!-Gi -7
7- '
----------- ------
I-- ------- 4------
I I ------ --------- -4--
---L-1
4'
---------- ...........
3- '
----------------- ------- ------I------
2
-- --------- ------- ------ ......
0
0 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 101112131 Is 1 181920212223242�5262728293031323334353637383940
Tiam (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis - Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3..10"
Preparedby Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCAD@)9.10 s/n06611 02010 HydroCAD Software Solutions I-I-C Page 18
Summary for Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C" series
Inflow Area 49,862 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.77" for 2 yr event
Inflow 0.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 3,202 cf
Primary 0.73 cis @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 3,202 cf, Atten=0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs
Link 141LT Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series
Hydrograph
z 4-- -4--4 —1........ ------ --------------- rE Inflow I
O.S. a Pii=ry
o.76,
0.7
-4-------------------
0.6.
--Y-7 7-7--i------- --------- ---- --
0.55
-- ---------
5-
0.
------- -- ----------
0.4&
0.4-
7--i -T
EL 0.35.
4...4 -------�-4--i--i--- F -----------------
- ---------
0.3
0.25
4-
0.2
-----------
-7--F-i---�-7
0.1. ----------
0.05.
0.
0 1 2 3 4 5,6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
Tim (houm)
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis- Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50-
Prepared by Microsoft Printed' 8/1 al2ol 5
HydroCADO 9.10 s/n 06611 0 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane I
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 111S: EX-1 Runoff Area=318,326 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.6r
Flow Length:�430' Tc=13.4 min CN=70 Runoff=10.85 efs 44,40o cf
Subcatchment 1136S: EX-4 Runoff Area=49,366 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
Flow Length=420' Tc=14.2 min CN=70 Runoff=1.65 cis 6,886 cf
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2 Runoff Area=127,758 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
Flow Lehgth=475' Tc=15.6 min CN=70 Runoff=4.10 cfs 17,820 cf
Subcatchment 138S: EX-3 Runoff Area=221,679 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"
Flow Length=470' Tc=1 1.9 min CN=70 Runoff=7.90 cfj 30,920 cf
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.6r
Flow Length=560' Tc--12.3 min CN=70 Runoff=1.74 cis 6,955 cf
Subcatchment 142S: EX-RES I Runoff Area--93,234 sf 45.71% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.910
FlowLength=300' Tc--5.OmIn CN=85 Runoff=7.30cfs22,602cf
Subcatrhment 143S: EX-RES 2 Runoff Area�-12,285sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55a
FlowLength=105' Tc=5.Omjn CN=81 Runoff--0.84cfs 2,609cf
Unk 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow--27.50cfs 118,350cf
Primary--27.50 cfs 118,350 cf
Unk 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--1 1.32 cis 47,008 cf
Primary--I 1.32 cis 47,008 cf
Unk 13OL: Runoff towards Isolated Wetiand "B N series Inflow--1.65 ds 6,886 cf
Primary--1.65 ds 6,886 cf
Unk 132L: Runoff into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue Inflow--9.74 cis 40,422 cf
Primary--9.74 cis 40,422 d
Unk 139L: Runcyff towards existing wetlands to the south Inflow--16.51 cis 71,342 d
Primary-16.51 ds 71,342 d
Unk 141L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "CN series Inflow--1.74 cis 6,955 cf
Primary--1.74 ds 6,955 cf
Total Runoff Area=872,5110 sf Runoff Volume=132,190 ef Average Runoff Depth = 1.82"
94.69% Pervious=826,204sf 5.31%Impervious=46,306 sf
Existing Condition Watershed Analysis-Clark Avenue, Salem MA
existing-submittal Type N 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 8/18/2015
HydroCADOMO s/n06611 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pa-ge 2
Time span=0.00-40.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 801 points x 3
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 11IS: EX-1 �RunoffArea=318,326sf 0.00% lmpervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
FlowLength=430' Tc=13.4min CN=70 Runoff=21.43cfs85,075cf
Subcatchment 1136S: EX-4 Runoff Area=49,366sf 0.00% lmpervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flowl-ength=420' Tc=14.2min CN=70 Runoff=3.26ds 13,193d
Subcatchment 137S: EX-2 Runoff Area=127,758 sf 0.00% lmpervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
FlowLength=475' Tc--15.6min CN=70 Runoff=8.16ds 34,144d
Subcatchment 1138S: EX-3 Runoff Area=221,679 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
Flow Length=470' Tc=l 1.9 min CN=70 Runoff=1 5.61 ds 59,245 cf
Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 Runoff Area=49,862 sf 0.0M Impervious Runoff Depth=3.21"
FlowLength=560' Tc=12.3min CN=70. Runoff=3.47ds 13,321
Subcatchment 142S: EX-RES 1 Runoff Area--93,234 sf 45.71% Impervious Runoff Depth=4*78a
Flow Length=300' Tc=5.0 min CN=85 Runoff=l 1.77 ds 37,107 d
Subcatchment 143S: EX-RES 2 Runoff Area=12,285sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.340
FlowLength=105' Tc=5.Omin CN=81 Runo"- .43ds 4,445cf
Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area Inflow--52.76 ds 220,017 d
Primary--52.76 cfs 220,017 d
Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north Inflow--22.23 ds 89,520 cf
Primary--22.23 ds 89,520 cf
Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B"series Inflow--3.26 ds 13,193 cl'
Primary--3.26 efs 13,193 cf
Link 132L: Runoff Into existing catch basins on Clark Avenue Inflow--I 6.95 ds 71,251 d
Primary--16.95 ds 71,251 cf
Link 1391.: Runoff towards e)dsting wetlands to the south Inflow--30.96 ds 130,497 cf
Primary--30.96 cfs 130,497 cf
Link 141L: Runcyff towards Isolated Wetland "C"series Inflow--3.47 cfs 13,326 cf
Primary--3.47 cfs 13,326 ef
Total Runoff Area=872,510 sf Runoff Volume=246,536ef Average Runoff Depth =3.39"
94.69%Pervious=826,204sf 5.31%Impervious=,N,306 sf
Proposed Condition
Watershed Analysis
12
�IR D I
M-�D2 ///.7
W.I
Routing Diagram for proposed-SUBMITTAL—R
Prepared by Microsoft, PrintedGIMW0115
FHydCADO 10.00-15 s1n 06611 0 2015 HydroCAD Soft�re Solutions LLC
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis- Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area CN Description
(sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers)
74,537 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C (1 38S. 149S, 155S)
234,394 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (80S, 81S, 11 IS, 136S, 137S, 138S, 142S,
143S, 144S, 145S, 146S, 147S, 149S, 150S, 151S, 152S, 153S, 154S, 156S)
94,546 98 Paved parking, HSG C (80S, 81S, 144S, 145S, 146S, 147S. 149S, 150S, 152S,
153S, 154S)
4,840 91 Rip Rap, HSG C (1 56S)
4,490 91 Rip rap slope, HSG C (111 S)
1,125 98 Roofs, HSG C (1 48S)
2,382 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C (1 36S, 137S)
37,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C (80S, 111 S, 136S, 137S, 138S, 142S, 143S, 144S.
145S, 146S, 147S, 150S. 151S, 152S, 153S, 154S, 156S)
418,696 70 Woods, Good, HSG C (81 S, 11 IS, 136S. 137S, 138S, 140S, 143S, 149S,
151S, 155S)
872,510 77 TOTAL AREA
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis- Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMIrrAL R
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAE)010.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 3
Soil Listing (all nodes)
Area Soil Subcatchment
(sq-ft) Group Numbers
0 HSG A
0 HSG B
872,510 HSG C 80S, 81S, 111S, 136S, 137S, 138S, 140S, 142S, 143S, 144S, 145S, 146S,
147S, 148S, 149S, 150S, 151S, 152S, 153S, 154S, 155S, 156S
0 HSG D
0 Other
872,510 TOTAL AREA
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@)10.00-15 s/n 06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4
Pipe Listing (all nodes)
Line# Node In-invert Out-Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Inside-Fill
Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (fuft) (inches) (inches) (inches)
1 142P 131.50 129.75 175.0 0.0100 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
2 143P 127.50 127.00 16.0 0.0313 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
3 144P 114.50 114.00 13.0 0.0385 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
4 152P 113.50 113.00 10.0 0.0500 0.010 12.0 0.0 0.0
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis- Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rain/611=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9118/2015
HydroC AD@ 10.00-15 s/n 06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Summary for Subcatchment 8OS: PR-CB O+ORT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.29 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 901 cf, Depth= 2.16"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,515 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
3,107 98 Paved parking, HSG C
4,997 91 Weighted Average
1,515 30.32% Pervious Area
3,482 69.68% Impervious Area
375 10.77% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 15 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
4.0 205 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 81 S: PR-CB O+OLT
[49) Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.33 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,026 cf, Depth= 1.39"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
375 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
3,751 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
3,023 98 Paved parking, HSG C
1,700 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
8,849 81 Weighted Average
5,826 65.84% Pervious Area
3,023 34.16% Impervious Area
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMIT-I'AL.-R Type H/24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.11 0"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 15 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 160 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.0 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc= 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 111S: EXAR
Runoff 3.15 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 13,751 cf, Depth=-0.87"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
141,864 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
37,700 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
6,000 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,490 91 Rip rap slope, HSG C
190,054 72 Weighted Average
184,054 96.84% Pervious Area
6,000 3.16% Impervious Area
6,000 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (fttft) (ft/sec) WS)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.7 275 0.1500 6.24 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
13.6 475 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 136S: EX-4R
Runoff 1.15cfs@ 12.22hrs, Volume= 5,113 cf, Depth= 0.87"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type W 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@)10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Area (sf) CN Description
51,513, 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
2,250 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,142 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
15,763 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
70,668 72 Weighted Average
67,276 95.20% Pervious Area
3,392 4.80% Impervious Area
3,392 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.3 220 0.0300 2.79 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
14.2 420 Total Summary for Subcatchment 137S: EX-2r
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.36 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 1,153cf, Depth= 1.03"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN AdJ Description
500 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,240 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
11,363 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
13,478 77 75 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
11,863 88.02% Pervious Area
1,615 11.98% Impervious Area
1,615 1100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 50 0.0800 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.5 100 0.0400 3.22 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.6 95 0.0260 2.610 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 35 0.1100 5.34 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.5 280 Total, Increased to minimum Tc= 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMIrrAL-R Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/1812015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 8
Summary for Subcatchment 138S: EX-3R
Runoff 2.84 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 13,329 cf, Depth= 0.82"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
400 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
159,236 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
3,750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
32,000 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
195,386 71 Weighted Average
191,516 98.02% Pervious Area
3,870 1.98% Impervious Area
3,750 96.90% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
14.8 100 0.0530 0.11 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.5 180 0.1700 6.64 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.3 45 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
15.6 325 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 140S: EX-5 (No Change)
Runoff 0.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 3,202 cf, Depth= 0.77"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
49,862 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
49,862 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fYsec) (Cfs)
10.0 100 0.1400 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1400 6.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.0 360 0.0360 3.05 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
12.3 560 Total
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC — Page 9
Summary for Subcatchment 142S: PR- POND 2
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.38 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 1,237cf, Depth= 1.03"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
13,712 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
14,462 75 Weighted Average
13,712 94.81% Pervious Area
750 5.19% Impervious Area
750 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 20 0.0700 4.26 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 15 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
3.6 85 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 143S: PR-POND 1
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.14cfs@ 12.09hrs, Volume= 3,690 cf, Depth= 1.03"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Adi Description
4,125 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
33,998 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
5,000 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
43,123 76 75 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
38,998 90.43% Pervious Area
4,125 9.57% Impervious Area
4,125 100.00% Unconnected
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis- Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITrAL-R Type /11 24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.1 Oft
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.8 50 0.0550 0.22 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
1.1 170 0.0250 2.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 65 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
5.0 285 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 144S: PR-CB 1+65 RT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.40 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,256 cf, Depth= 1.91"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,125 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
3,458 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,319 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,902 88 Weighted Average
3,319 42.00% Pervious Area
4,583 58.00% Impervious Area
1,125 24.55% Unconnected
Te Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.9 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 145S: PR-CB 3+50LT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.87 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 2,741 cf, Depth= 1.99"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type M 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
7,358 98 Paved parking, HSG C
6,539 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
16,522 89 Weighted Average
6,539 39.58% Pervious Area
9,983 60.42% Impervious Area
2,625 26.29% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft1sec) (cfs)
3.6 20 0.0100 0.09 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.7 285 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
5.3 315 Total Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
Summary for Subcatchment 146S-. PR-CB 3+50RT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.77 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,402 cf, Depth= 2.16"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
6,914 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,775 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
13,314 91 Weighted Average
3,775 28.35% Pervious Area
9,539 71.65% Impervious Area
2,625 27.52% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft1ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.9 15 0.0100 0.09 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=-20.3 fps
1.7 285 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.6 310 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type W 24-hr 2 yr Raintall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pacie 12
Summary for Subcatchment 147S: PR-CB 1+65 LT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.48 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 1,499 cf, Depth= 1.99-
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,314 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,225 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
9,039 89 Weighted Average
3,M 35.68% Pervious Area
5,814 64.32% Impervious Area
1,500 25.80% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.9 200 Total, Increased to rhinimurn Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 148S: 3/4 roof area Lot 12
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.08cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 269 cf, Depth= 2.87"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,125 98 Roofs, HSG C
1,125 100.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (Gfs)
1.0 Direct Entry,
1.0 0 Total, Increased to minimum Tc= 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem IVIA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD(9) 10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13
Summary for Subcatchment 149S: EX-RES I r
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 4.27 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 13,219 cf, Depth= 1.67"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
61,852 81 113 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
24,065 98 Paved parking, HSG C
7,317 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
1,606 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
94,840 85 Weighted Average
52,219 55.06% Pervious Area
42,621 44.94% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1000 5.09 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.2 150 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.0 300 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 150S: PR-CB Road B
Runoff 1.68cfs@ 12.10hrs, Volume= 5,442 cf, Depth= 2.08"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
3,750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
10,385 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
17,318 98 Paved parking, HSG C
31,453 90 Weighted Average
10,385 33.02% Pervious Area
21,068 66.98% Impervious Area
3,750 17.80% Unconnected
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type N 24-hr 2 yr Raintall,=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 14
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.3 35 0.0200 0.14 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated. Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
2.2 270 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
6.5 315 Total I
Summary for Subcatchment 151 S: PR-POND 3
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.60 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 1,981 d, Depth= 0.92"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Adi Description
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
20,077 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
5,400 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
25,852 74 73 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
25,477 98.55% Pervious Area
375 1.45% Impervious Area
375 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.4 50 0.1700 0.34 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 115 0.1700 6.64 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 10 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.7 175 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 152S: PR-CB 9+50LT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.82 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,549 cf, Depth= 2.16"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type M 24-hr 2 yr Raintall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,401 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,107 98 Paved parking, HSG C
14,133 91 Weighted Average
4,401 31.14% Pervious Area
9,732 68.86% Impervious Area
2,625 26.97% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.7 260 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
5.0 295 Total Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
Summary for Subcatchment 153S: PR-CB 10+84
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.93 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,931 cf, Depth= 2.26"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,875 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
3,834 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
9,884 98 Paved parking, HSG C
15,593 92 Weighted Average
3,834 24.59% Pervious Area
11,759 75.41% Impervious Area
1,875 15.95% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
�3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.1 165 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.4 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITrAL—IR Type /I/24-hr 2 yr Raintall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page-16
Summary for Subcatchment 154S: PR-CB 9+50RT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.87 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,703 cf, Depth= 1.99"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,875 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
6,425 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,998 98 Paved parking, HSG C
16,298 89 Weighted Average
6,425 39.42% Pervious Area
9,873 60.58% Impervious Area
1,875 18.99% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (Cfs)
2.7 40 0.0800 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.8 280 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.5 330 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 155S: EX-RES 2R
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.49 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,538 cf, Depth= 1.33"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
12,285 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
1,640 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
13,925 80 Weighted Average
10,240 73.53% Pervious Area
3,686 26.47% Impervious Area
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type /I/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.3 50 0.0400 0.19 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.4 55 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.7 105 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 156S: PR-POND 4
[491 Hint: Tc<2dt may req uire smaller dt
Runoff 0.72 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volurne= 2,275 cf, Depth= 1.26"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
15,295 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
4,840 91 Rip Rap, HSG C
21,635 79 Weighted Average
20,135 93.07% Pervious Area
1,500 6.93%.Impervious Area
1,500 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity C apacity Description
(min) (feet) (fVft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.6 50 0.1500 0.33 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 20 0.1200 5.58 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 30 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 25 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.8 125 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary fo r Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (infiltration System #1)
Inflow Area 14,971 sf, 50.97% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.76" for 2 yr event
Inflow 0.69 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volurne= 2,196 cf
Outflow 0.01 cfs @ 10.75 hrs, Volume= 1,083 cf, Atten= 99%, Lag= 0.0 min
Discarded 0.01 cfs @ 10.75 hrs, Volurne= 1,083 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type N 24-hr 2 yr Rainfag=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18
Peak Elev= 124.00' @ 22.51 hrs Surf.Area= 1,489 sf Storage= 1,652 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 614.4 min ( 1,428.9- 814.5 ) I
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 122.40' 1,274 cf 25.67'W x 58.00%x 3.54'H Field A
5,272 cf Overall -2,086 cf Embedded = 3,186 cf x 40.0% Voids
#2A 122.90' 2,086 cf Cultec R-330XL x 40 Inside#1
Effective Size=47.8"W x 30.0"H => 7.45 sf x 7.00'L= 52.2 cf
Overall Size= 52.0"W x 30.5"H x 8.501 with 1.50' Overlap
5 Rows of 8 Chambers
3,361 cf Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 122.40' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#2 Secondary 127.75' 4.0' long x 1.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31
3.30 3.31 3.32
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 10.75 hrs HW=122.46' (Free Discharge)
't-I=Exriltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)
t!�20ndary u Flow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=122.40' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
= ro s
B adoCre ted Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 142P: Detention Pond 1
Inflow Area 60,064 sf, 24.18% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.29" for 2 yr event
Inflow 2.02 efs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 6,445 cf
Outflow 0.50 cis @ 12.49 hrs, Volume= 6,132 cf, Atten= 75%, Lag= 24.8 min
Discarded 0.01 cis @ 12,49 hrs, Volume= 688 d
Primary 0.49 cfs @ 12.49 hrs, Volume= 5,444 cf
Secondary 0.00 cis @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.06 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 134.10' @ 12.49 hrs Surf.Area= 1,653sf Storage= 2,319cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 3,660sf Storage= 8,258cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 136.0 min calculated for 6,132 cf(95% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 109.6 min ( 949.5 -839.9 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 132.00' 8,258 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type11124-hr 2yrRaintall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
132.00 600 0 0
133.00 1,060 830 830
134.00 1,590 1,325 2,155
135.00 2,210 1,900 4,055
136.00 2,910 2,560 6,615
136.50 3,660 1,643 8,258
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 131.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 175.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet I Outlet Invert= 131.50'/ 129.75' S= 0.0100T Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 Device 1 132.75' 4.0"Vert. OrificelGrate C= 0.600
#3 Device 1 134.00' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 134.50' 10.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#5 Secondary 136.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00A.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2:65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
#6 Discarded 132.00' 0.270 in/hr Exi'lltration over Surface area
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cis @ 12.49 hrs HW=1 34.10' (Free Discharge)
t--6--Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cis)
Primary OutFlow Max=0.49 cis @ 12.49 hrs HW=134.10' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
t--I=Culvert (Passes 0.49 cis of 5.29 cis potential flow)
liOrifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.46 cis @ 5.24 fps)
Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 1.08 fps) ,
Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cis)
2econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 32.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L-5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2
Inflow Area 44,298 sf, 45.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.73" for 2 yr event
Inflow 2.02 cis @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 6,380 cf
Outflow 0.16 cis @ 13.50 hrs, Volume= 5,934 cf, Atten= 92%, Lag= 85.3 min
Discarded 0.02 cis @ 13.50 hrs, Volume= 1,852 cf
Primary 0.14 cis @ 13.50 hrs, Volume= 4,082 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 129.30' @ 13.50 hrs Surf.Area= 3,099 sf Storage= 3,348 cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 6,340 sf Storage= 17,293 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 355.0 min calculated for 5,927 cf(93%of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 319.4 min ( 1,137.0 - 817.7
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.110"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD010.00-15 s/n06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 128.00' 17,293 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
128.00 1,800 0 0
128.50 2,560 1,090 1,090
2,890 1,363 2,453
130.00 3,590 3,240 5,693
131.00 4,350 3,970 9,663
132.00 . 5,160 4,755 14,418
132.50 6,340 2,875 17,293
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 127.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 16.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 127.50'/ 127.00' S= 0.0313? Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 Secondary 132.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
#3 Discarded 128.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#4 Device 1 128.50' 2.5"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 13.50 hrs HW=129.30' (Free Discharge)
t--3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=O.14 cfs @ 13.50 hrs HW=129.30' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
t--1=Culvert (Passes 0.14 cfs of 4.31 cfs potential flow)
t--4--Oriflce/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.14 cfs @ 4.01 fps)
tecondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=128.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4
Inflow Area 67,659 sf, 48.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.86" for 2 yr event
Inflow 3.32 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 10,459 cf
Outflow 1.01 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 9,742 cf, Atten= 70%, Lag= 20.1 min
Discarded 0.02 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 1,088 cf
Primary 1.00 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 8,654 ef
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 119.36' @ 12.41 hrs Surf.Area= 2,611 sf Storage= 3,845 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 145.0 min calculated for 9,74� cf(93% of inflow)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type //I 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21
Center-of-Mass det. time= 108.8 min ( 922.1 - 813.2
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 117.00' 18,006 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
117.00 790 0 0
118.00 1,460 1,125 1,125
119.00 2,230 1,845 2,970
120.00 3,285 2,758 5,728
121.00 4,480 3,883 9,610
122.00 5,825 5,153 14,763
122.50 7,150 3,244 18,006
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 114.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 13.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 114.50'/ 114.00' S= 0.03857' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 Discarded 117.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltratlon over Surface area
#3 Device 1 118.00' 6.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 120.50' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#5 Secondary 122.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
�iscarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=1 19.36' (Free Discharge)
!2=Exfiltratlon (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 efs)
Primary OutFlow Max�-1.00 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=1 19.36' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
t-1=Culvert (Passes 1.00 cfs of 7.90 cfs potential flow)
[�3=Orifiee/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.00 cfs @ 5.07 fps)
4_
_Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
§econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 efs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 17.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L--5--Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 152P: Detention Pond 3
Inflow Area 57,305 sf, 37.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.55" for 2 yr event
Inflow 2.28 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 7,423 cf
Outflow 0.81 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volume= 6,983 cf, Atten= 64%, Lag= 18.3 min
Discarded 0.02 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volurne= 1,831 cf
Primary 0.79 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volurne= 5,151 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volurne= 0 Gf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-11 Type U/24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.1 0"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCADDIO.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22
Peak Elev= 116.06' @ 12.40 hrs Surf.Area= 2,912sf Storage= 2,70lef
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 5,400sf Storage= 12,340cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 224.3 min calculated for 6,974 cf(94% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 193.6 min ( 1,017.7 - 824.1 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 115.00' 12,340 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
115.00 2,200 0 0
116.00 2,870 2,535 2,535
117.00 3,600 3,235 5,770
118.00 4,560 4,080 9,850
118.50 5,400 2,490 12,340
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 113.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 10.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 113.50'/ 113.00' S= 0.0500T Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 Device 1 115.50' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#3 Secondary 118.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2-72 2.76 2.83
#4 Discarded 115.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.40 hrs HW=1 16.06' (Free Discharge)
t--4--Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=0.79 cfs @ 12.40 hrs HW=1 16.06' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
't-1=Culvert (Passes 0.79 cfs of 5.42 cfs potential flow)
't--2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.79 cfs @ 2.54 fps)
!econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 15.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area
Inflow Area 751,980 sf, 20.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.06" for 2 yr event
Inflow 10.88 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 66,321 cf
Primary 10.88 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 66,321 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMirrAL R Type ///24-hr 2 yr Rainfafi=3.10"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 911812015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23
Summary for Link 128IL: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Inflow Area 315,936 sf, 19.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.06" for 2 yr event
Inflow 4.48 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 28,026 cf
Primary 4.48 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 28,026 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary oufflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B" series
Inflow Area 70,668 sf, 4.80% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.87n for 2 yr event
Inflow 1.15 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 5,113 cf
Primary 1.15cfs@ 12.22hrs, Volurne= 5,113 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 1321-: Runoff towards Clark Avenue Drainage System
Inflow Area 123,289 sf, 42.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.40" for 2 yr event
Inflow 4.63 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volurne= 14,372 cf
Primary 4.63 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volurne= 14,372 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 1391-: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Inflow Area 436,044 st 21.03% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.05" for 2 yr event
Inflow 6.88 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volurne= 38,296 cf
Primary 6.88 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volurne= 38,296 cf, Aften= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 141L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetiand "C" series
Inflow Area 49,862 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.77" for 2 yr event
Inflow 0.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volurne= 3,202 cf
Primary 0.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volurne= 3,202 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type N 24-hr 10 yr Rainfafi=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1
Summary for Subcatchment 80S: PR-CB O+ORT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.46 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 1,457 cf, Depth= 3.50"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,515 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
3,107 98 Paved parking, HSG C
4,997 91 Weighted Average
1,515 30.32% Pervious Area
3,482 69.68% Impervious Area
375 10.77% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 15 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.0 205 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 81 S: PR-CB O+OLT
[49) Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.61 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,879 cf, Depth= 2.55"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (so CN Description
375 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
3,751 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
3,023 98 Paved parking, HSG C
1,700 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
8,849 81 Weighted Average
5,826 65.84% Pervious Area
3,023 34.16% Impervious Area
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type ///24-hr 10 yr Raintall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 15 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 160 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.0 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 111 S: EX-1 R
Runoff 7.10cfs@ 12.20hrs, Volume= 28,831 cf, Depth= 1.82"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
141,864 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
37,700 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
6,000 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,490 91 Rip rap slope, HSG C
190,054 72 Weighted Average
184,054 96.84% Pervious Area
6,000 3.16% Impervious Area
6,000 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.7 275 0.1500 6.24 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
18.6 475 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 136S: EX-4R
Runoff 2.60 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 10,720 cf, Depth= 1.82"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type /H 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@)10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pa-ge 3
Area (sf) CN Description
51,513 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
2,250 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
15,763 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
70,668 72 Weighted Average
67,276 95.20% Pervious Area
3,392 4.80% Impervious Area
3,392 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft1ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.3 220 0.0300 2.79 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
14,2 420 Total
Summary for Subeatchment 137S: EX-2r
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require sma fler dt
Runoff 0.74 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 2,303 cf, Depth= 2.05"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Ado Description
500 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,240 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
11,363 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
13,478 77 75 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
11,863 88.02% Pervious Area
1,615 11.98% Impervious Area
1,615 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 50 0.0800 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.5 100 . 0.0400 3.22 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.6 95 0.0260 2.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 35 0.1100 5.34 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.5 280 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITrAL-R Type /I/24-hr 10 yr Raintall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 4
Summary for Subcatchment 138S: EX-3R
Runoff 6.59 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 28,435 cf, Depth= 1.75"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
400 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
159,236 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
3,750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
32,000 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
195,386 71 Weighted Average
191,516 98.02% Pervious Area
3,870 1.98% Impervious Area
3,750 96.90% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft1sec) (Cfs)
14.8 100 0.0530 0.11 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.5 180 0.1700 6.64 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.3 45 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
15.6 325 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 140S: EX-5 (No Change)
Runoff 1.74 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 6,955 cf, Depth-- 1.67"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
49,862 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
49,862 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc- Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
10.0 100 0.1400 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1400 6.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.0 360 0.0360 3.05 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
12.3 560 Total
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type 1/1 24-hr 10 yr Raintafi=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Summary for Subcatchment 142S: PR- POND 2
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.79 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 2,471 cf, Depth= 2.05"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
13,712 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
14,462 75 Weighted Average
13,712 94.81% Pervious Area
750 5.19% Impervious Area
750 100.00% Unconnected
Tc; Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 20 0.0700 4.26 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps,
0.0 15 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
3.6 85 Total, Increased to minimum Tc= 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 143S: PR-POND I
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 2.37 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 7,368 cf, Depth= 2.05"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Adi Description
4,125 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
33,998 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
5,000 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
43,123 76 75 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
38,998 90.43% Pervious Area
4,125 9.57% Impervious Area
4,125 100.00% Unconnected
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type N 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft1sec) (cfs)
3.8 50 0.0550 0.22 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
1.1 170 O.U50 2.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 65 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
5.0 285 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 144S: PR-CB 1+65 RT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.67 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,105 cf, Depth= 3.20"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,125 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
3,458 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,319 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,902 88 Weighted Average
3,319 42.00% Pervious Area
4,583 58.00% Impervious Area
1,125 24.55% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft1ft) (ft1sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow'Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.9 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subeatchment 145S, PR-CB 3+50LT
[49) Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.42 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 4,537 cf, Depth= 3.30"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type M 24-hr 10 yr Rainfafi=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015HydroCADS oftware Solutions LLC Pa-ge 7
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
7,358 98 Paved parking, HSG C
6,539 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
16,522 89 Weighted Average
6,539 39.58% Pervious Area
9,983 60.42% Impervious Area
2,625 26.29% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (fttft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.6 20 0.0100 0.09 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
1.7 285 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
5.3 315 Total Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
Summary for Subcatchment 1146S: PR-CB 3+50RT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.22 cfs @ 1 2.07 hrs, Volume= 3,881 cf, Depth= 3.50"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
6,914 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,775 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
13,314 91 Weighted Average
3,775 28.35% Pervious Area
9,539 71.65% Impervious Area
2,625 27.52% Uncormected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (fttft) (ft1sec) (cfs)
2.9 15 0.0100 0.09 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.7 285 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.6 310 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis- Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type /I/24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft. Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 8
Summary for Subcatchment 147S: PR-CB 1+65 LT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.79 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,482 cf, Depth= 3.30"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SGS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,314 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,225 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
9,039 89 Weighted Average
3,225 35.68% Pervious Area
5,814 64.32% Impervious Area
1,500 25.80% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.9 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 148S: 3/4 roof area Lot 12
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.11 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 400 cf, Depth= 4.26"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,125 98 Roofs, HSG C
1,125 100.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
1.0 Direct Entry,
1.0 0 Total, Increased to minimum Tc 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMIrTAL R Type /11 24-hr 10 yr Raintall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9
Summary for Subcatchment 149S: EX-RES 1 r
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 7.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 22,992 cf, Depth= 2.91"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
61,852 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
24,065 98 Paved parking, HSG C
7,317 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
1,606 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
94,840 85 Weighted Average
52,219 55.06% Pervious Area
42,621 44.94% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1000 5.09 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.2 150 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
5.0 300 Total Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
Summary for Subcatchment 15OS: PR-CB Road B
Runoff 2.70 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 8,901 cf, Depth= 3.40"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
3,750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
10,385 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
17,318 98 Paved parking, HSG C
31,453 90 Weighted Average
10,385 33.02% Pervious Area
21,068 66.98% Impervious Area
3,750 17.80% Unconnected
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type ///24-hr 10 yr Raintall=4.5,0"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@)10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paue 10
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) �cfs)
4.3 35 0.0200 0.14 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
2.2 270 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
6.5 315 Total Summary for Subcatchment 151 S: PR-POND 3
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.30 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 4,084 cf, Depth= 1.90"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Adi Description
375 .98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
20,077 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
5,400 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
25,852 74 73 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
25,477 98.55% Pervious Area
375 1.45% Impervious Area
375 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (fUft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.4 50 0.1700 0.34 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 115 0.1700 6.64 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 10 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.7 175 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 152S: PR-CB 9+50LT
[49) Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.29 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 4,120 cf, Depth= 3.50"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type 24-hr 10 yr Raintall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,401 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,107 98 Paved parking, HSG C
14,133 91 Weighted Average
4,401 31.14% Pervious Area
9,732 68.86% Impervious Area
2,625 26.97% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 013 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.7 260 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
5.0 295 Total Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
Summary for Subcatchment 153S: PR-CB 10+84
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.45 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 4,681 cf, Depth= 3.60"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,875 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
3,834 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
9,884 98 Paved parking, HSG C
15,593 92 Weighted Average
3,834 24.59% Pervious Area
11,759 75.41% Impervious Area
1,875 15.95% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.1 165 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.4 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8131/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD010.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 12
Summary for Subcatchment 154S: PR-CB 9+5ORT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.42 cfs @ 1 2.07 hrs, Volume= 4,475 cf, Depth= 3.30"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.0040.00 hrs, dt= 0.05.hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,875 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
6,425 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,998 98 Paved parking, HSG C
16,298 89 Weighted Average
6,425 39.42% Pervious Area
9,873 60.58% Impervious Area
1,875 18.99% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (Cfs)
2.7 40 0.0800 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.8 280 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.5 330 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 155S: EX-RES 2R
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.92 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 2,856 cf, Depth= 2.46"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
12,285 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
1,640 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
13,925 80 Weighted Average
10,240 73.53% Pervious Area
3,686 26.47% Im pervious Area
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type M 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD010,00-15 sln06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.3 50 0.0400 0.19 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.4 55 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.7 -105 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subeatchment 156S: PR-POND 4
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.38 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 4,285 cf, Depth= 2.38"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
15,295 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
4,840 91 Rip Rap, HSG C
21,635 79 Weighted Average
20,135 93.07% Pervious Area
1,500 6.93% Impervious Area
1,500 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fttsec) (cfs)
2.6 50 0.1500 0.33 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 20 0.1200 5.58 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 30 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 25 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.8 125 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (infiltration System#1)
Inflow Area 14,971 sf, 50.97% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.99" for 10 yr event
Inflow 1.18 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 3,735 cf
Outflow 0.01 cfs @ 9.45 hrs, Volume= 1,133 cf, Atten= 99%, Lag= 0.0 min
Discarded 0.01 cfs @ 9.45 hrs, Volume= 1,133 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 Cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8131/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type W 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14
Peak Elev= 125.56' @24.04 hrs Surf.Area= 1,489sf Storage= 3,136cf
Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 582.1 min ( 1,383.9-801.8 ) I
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 122.40' 1,274 cf 25.67'W x 58.00'L x 3.54'H Field A
5,272 cf Overall -2,086 cf Embedded = 3,186 cf x 40.0% Voids
#2A 122.90' 2,086 cf Cultec R-330XL x 40 Inside#1
Effective Size= 47.8"W x 30.0"H => 7.45 sf x 7.001 = 52.2 cf
Overall Size= 52.0"W x 30.5"H x 8.501 with 1.50' Overlap
5 Rows of 8 Chambers
3,361 cf Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 122.40' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#2 Secondary 127.75' 4.0' long x 1.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31
3.30 3.31 3.32
J)iscarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 9.45 hrs HW=122.46' (Free Discharge)
F-11=12xfIltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)
Leco ndary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=122.40' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 142P: Detention Pond I
Inflow Area 60,064 sf, 24.18% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.39" for 10 yr event
Inflow 3.81 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 11,955 cf
Outflow 1.83 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 11,637 cf, Atten= 52%, Lag= 10.6 min
Discarded 0.01 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 748 cf
Primary 1.82 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 10,889 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 134.73' @ 12.25 hrs Surf.Area= 2,042sf Storage= 3,479cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 3,660sf Storage= 8,258cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 90.7 min calculated for 11,623 cf(97% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 76.4 min ( 900.1 - 823.7
Volume Invert Avail.Storaqe Storage Description
#1 132.00' 8,258 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMI71717AL-IR Type 1/1 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
132.00 600 0 0
133.00 1,060 830 830
134.00 1,590 1,325 2,155
135.00 2,210 1,900 4,055
136.00 2,910 2,560 6,615
136.50 3,660 1,643 8,258
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 131.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 175.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 131.50'/ 129.75' S= 0.01007' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 Device 1 132.75' 4.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#3 Device 1 134.00' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 134.50' 10.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#5 Secondary 136.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
#6 Discarded 132.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
Discarded OutFlow, Max=0.01 cfs @ 12.25 hrs HW=1 34.73' (Free Discharge)
t-6=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=1.82 cfs @ 12.25 hrs HW=134.73' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
1ulvert (Passes 1.82 cfs of 5.77 cfs potential flow)
2= rificelGrate (Orifice Controls 0.57 cfs @ 6.48 fps)
2=
3=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.06 cfs @ 3.02 fps)
-Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.20 cfs @ 1.63 fps)
§econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 32.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tallwater)
T5=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2
Inflow Area 44,298 sf, 45.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.95" for 10 yr event
Inflow 3.42 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volurne= 10,889 cf
Outflow 0.23 cfs @ 13.77 hrs, Volume= 10,272 cf, Affen= 93%, Lag= 101.4 min
Discarded 0.02 cfs @ 13.77 hrs, Volume= 2,110 cf
Primary 0.20 cfs @ 13.77 hrs, Volume= 8,163 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 130.12' @ 13.77 hrs Surf.Area= 3,683 sf Storage= 6,135 cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 6,340 sf Storage= 17,293 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 375.1 min calculated for 10,259 cf(94% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 345.1 min ( 1,149.1 -804.1
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type ///24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD810.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 16
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 128.00' 17,293 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area lnc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
128.00 1,800 0 0
128.50 2,560 1,090 1,090
129.00 2,890 1,363 2,453
130.00 3,590 3,240 5,693
131.00 4,350 3,970 9,663
132.00 5,160 4,755 14,418
132.50 6,340 2,875 17,293
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 127.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 16.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 127.50'/ 127.00' S= 0.0313'f Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 Secondary 132.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 Z76 2.83
#3 Discarded 128,00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#4 Device 1 128.50' 2.5"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
J)Iscarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 13.77 hrs HW=1 30.12' (Free Discharge)
F-3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=0.20 cfs @ 13.77 hrs HW=130.12' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
't-J=Culvert (Passes 0.20 cfs of 5.51 cfs potential flow)
T--4--Oriflce/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.20 cfs @ 5.93 fps)
tecondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=128.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 14413: Detention Pond 4
Inflow Area 67,659 sf, 48.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.11 for 10 yr event
Inflow 5.55 cfs @- 12.07 hrs, Volume= 17,560 cf
Outflow 1.35 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 16,836 cf, Atten= 76%, Lag= 23.3 min
Discarded 0.02 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 11,1197 cf
Primary 1.32 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 15,638 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 120.21' @ 12.46 hrs Surf.Area= 3,541 sf Storage= 6,457 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 112.8 min calculated for 16,815 cf(96% of inflow)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type N 24-hr 10 yr Rainfafi=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 Q 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17
Center-of-Mass det. time= 90.5 min ( 890.2 - 799.7 )
Volume Invert Avaii.Storage Storage Description
#1 117.00' 18,006 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
117.00 790 0 0
118.00 1,460 1,125 1,125
119.00 2,230 1,845 2,970
120.00 3,285 2,758 5,728
121.00 4,480 3,883 9,610
122.00 5,825 5,153 14,763
122.50 7,150 3,244 18,006
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 114.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 13.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 114.50'/ 114.00' S= 0.0385P Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, Flow Area= 0.79 sf
#2 Discarded 117.00' 0.270 in/hr Exflltration over Surface area
#3 Device 1 118.00' 6.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 120.50' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#5 Secondary 122.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
?!scarded OutFlow Max=0.02 efs @ 12.46 hrs HW=1 20.21' (Free Discharge)
2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=1.32 cfs @ 12.46 hrs HW=120.21' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
J=Culvert (Passes 1.32 cfs of 8.63 cfs potential flow)
tOrifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.32 cfs @ 6.75 fps)
:�__Orlflce/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
,Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 17.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
F-�=Broacl-Crestecl Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 152P: Detention Pond 3
Inflow A rea 57,305 sf, 37.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.72" for 10 yr event
Inflow 3.99 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 12,984 cf
Outflow 1.50 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 12,517 cf, Atten= 63%, Lag= 16.3 min
Discarded 0.02 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 1,940 cf
Primary 1.48 cfs @ 12.86 hrs, Volume= 10,577 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-11 Type ///24-hr 10 yr Raintall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@)10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18
Peak Elev= 116.60' @ 12.36 hrs Surf.Area= 3,311 sf Storage= 4,401 cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 5,400 sf Storage= 12,340 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 148.3 min calculated for 12,517 cf(96% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 127.5 min ( 938.0 - 810.4 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 115.00' 12,340 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
115.00 2,200 0 0
116.00 2,870 2,535 2,535
117.00 3,600. 3,235 5,770
118.00 4,560 4,080 9,850
118.50 5,400 2,490 12.340
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 113.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 10.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 113.50'/ 113.00' S= 0.0500T Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, Flow Area= 0.79 sf
#2 Device 1 115.50' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#3 Secondary 118.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5�00 5.50
Goef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
#4 Discarded 115.00' 0.270 in/hr Exi'litration over Surface area
J)Iscarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.36 hrs HW=1 16.60' (Free Discharge)
L 4 Exfiltratlon (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=1.47 cfs @ 12.36 hrs HW=1 16.60' TW=0.00' (Dynarnic Tailwater)
't_�=Culvert (Passes 1.47 cfs of 6.10 cfs potential flow)
_12=Orlflce/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.47 cfs @ 4.22 fps)
tecondary OutFlow Max=0.00 efs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 15.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging from project area
Inflow Area 751,980 sf, 20.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.09" for 10 yr event
Inflow 23.32 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 130,683 cf
Primary 23.32 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 130,683 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type ///24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by Microsoft . Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19
Summary for Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Inflow Area 315,936sf, 19.88% Impervious, lnflowDepth = 2.11" for 10yrevent
Inflow 9.04cfs@ 12.19hrs, Volume= 55,488 cf
Primary 9.04 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 55,488 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B" series
Inflow Area 70,668 sf, 4,80% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.82" for 10 yr event
Inflow 2.60 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volurne= 10,720 cf
Primary 2.60 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volurne= 10,720 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 132L: Runoff towards Clark Avenue Drainage Syst ern
Inflow Area 123,289 sf, 42.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.46" for 10 yr event
Inflow 8.11 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 25,295 cf
Primary 8.11 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 25,295 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Inflow Area 436,044 sf, 21.03% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.07" for 10 yr event
Inflow 14.80 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 75,195 cf
Primary 14.80 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 75,195 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 141 L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland 'C" series
Inflow Area 49,862 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.67" for 10 yr event
Inflow 1.74 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 6,955 cf
Primary 1.74 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volurne= 6,955 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type N 24-hr 100 yr Rain/611=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20
Summary for Subcatchment 8OS: PR-CB O+ORT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.69 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,268 cf, Depth= 5.45"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,515 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
3,107 98 Paved parking, HSG C
4,997 91 Weighted Average
1,515 30.32% Pervious Area
3,482 69.68% Impervious Area
10.77% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 15 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
4.0 205 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 81S: PR-CB O+OLT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.03 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 3,202 cf, Depth= 4.34"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
3,751 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
375 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
3,023 98 Paved parking, HSG C
1,700 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
8,849 81 Weighted Average
5,826 65.84% Pervious Area
3,023 34.16% Impervious Area
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type I//24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
I Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 15 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 160 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.0 20 0 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment I I I S: EX-1 R
Runoff 13.56 ofs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 53,957 cf, Depth= 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
141,864 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
37,700 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
6,000 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,490 91 Rip rap slope, HSG C
190,054 72 Weighted Average
184,054 96.84% Pervious Area
6,000 3.16% Impervious Area
6,000 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
12.5 1.00 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0-4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0,.7 275 0.1500 6.24 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
13.6 475 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 136S: EX-4R
Runoff 4.97 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 20,063 cf, Depth= 3.41
Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt--' 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type 1/1 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCADED10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 22
Area (sf) CN Description
51,513 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
2,250 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,142 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
15,763 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
70,668 72 Weighted Average
67,276 95.20% Pervious Area
3,392 4.80% Impervious Area
3,392 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Descrip tion
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (Cfs)
12.5 100 0.0800 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.4 100 0.0800 4.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.3 220 0.0300 2.79 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
14.2 420 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 137S: EX-2r
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.35 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 4,169 cf, Depth= 3.71
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Adj Description
500 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
1,240 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
11,363 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
13,478 77 75 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
11,863 88.02% Pervious Area
1,615 11.98% Impervious Area
1,615 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 50 0.0800 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.5 100 0.0400 3.22 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.6 95 0.0260 2.60 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 35 0.1100 5.34 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.5 280 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type 1/1 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23
Summary for Subcatchment 138S: EX-311
Runoff 12.88 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, 'Volume= 53,839 cf, Depth= 3.31
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
400 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
159,236 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
3,750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
32,000 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
195,386 71 Weighted Average
191,516 98.02% Pervious Area
3,870 1.98% Impervious Area
3,750 96.90% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ftift) (fttsec) (cfs)
14.8 100 0.0530 0.11 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.5 180 0.1700 6.64 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.3 45 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
15.6 325 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 14OS: EX-5 (No Change)
Runoff 3.47 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 13,326cf, Depth= 3.21"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt='0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
49,862 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
49,862 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs)
10.0 100 0.1400 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1400 6,02 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.0 360 0.0360 3.05 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
12.3 560 Total
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITrAL R Type N 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9118/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24
Summary for Subcatchment 142S: PR- POND 2
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.45 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 4,474 cf, Depth= 3.71
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
13,712 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
750 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
14,462 75 Weighted Average
13,712 94.81% Pervious Area
750 5.19% Impervious Area
750 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 20 0.0700 4.26 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 15 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
3.6 85 Total, Increased to minimum Tc= 5.0 min
Summary forSubcatchment 143S: PR-POND 1
[49) Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 4.31 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 13,340 cf, Depth= 3.71"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs' dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Adi Description
4,125 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
33,998 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
5,000 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
43,123 76 75 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
38,998 90.43% Pervious Area
4,125 9.57% Impervious Area
4,125 100.00% Unconnected
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type ///24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@)10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pac
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _ie 25
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.8 50 0.0550 0.22 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
1.1 170 0.0250 2.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 65 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
5.0 285 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 144S: PR-CB 1+65 RT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.05 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 3,364cf, Depth= 5.11"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,125 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
3,458 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,319 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,902 88 Weighted Average
3,319 42.00% Pervious Area
4,583 58.00% Impervious Area
1,125 24.55% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) � (ft/ft) (ft1sec) (Cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.9 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc= 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 145S: PR-CB 3+50LT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 2.20 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 7,188 cf, Depth= 5.22"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type N 24-hr 100 yr Raintall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
7,358 98 Paved parking, HSG C
6,539 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
16,522 89 Weighted Average
6,539 39.58% Pervious Area
9,983 60.42% Impervious Area
2,625 26.29% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.6 20 0.0100 0.09 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps -
1.7 285 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.3 315 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 146S: PR-CB 3+50RT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.85 efs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 6,044 cf, Depth= 5.45"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.,05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
6,914 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,775 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
13,314 91 Weighted Average
3,775 28.35% Pervious Area
9,539 71.65% Impervious Area
2,625 27.52% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.9 15 0.0100 0.09 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.7 285 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
4.6 310 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type /11 24-hr 100 yr Raintall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27
Summary for Subcatchment 147S: PR-CB 1+65 LT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.22 cfs @ .12.07 hrs, Volume= 3,933 cf, Depth= 5.22"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,314 98 Paved parking, HSG C
3,225 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
9,039 89, Weighted Average
3,225 35.68% Pervious Area
5,814 64.32% Impervious Area
1,500 25.80% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft1ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
Oao 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
0.6 165 0.0500 4.54 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.9 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 148S: 3/4 roof area Lot 12
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 0.17cfs@ 12.07-his, Volume= 587 cf, Depth= 6.26"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,125 98 Roofs, HSG C
1,125 100.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
1.0 Direct Entry,
1.0 0 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type N 24-hr 100 yr Rainfafi=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCADED 10.00-15 s/n 06611 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 28
Summary for Subcatchment 149S: EX-RES 1 r
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 11.97 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 37,746 cf, Depth= 4.78"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
61,852 81 113 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
24,065 98 Paved parking, HSG C
7,317 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
1,606 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
94,840 85 Weighted Average
52,219 55.06% Pervious Area
42,621 44.94% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.5 50 0.0700 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 100 0.1000 5.09 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
1.2 150 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
5.0 300 Total Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
Summar y for Subcatchment 15OS: PR-C13 Road B
Runoff 4.14 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 13,980 cf, Depth= 5.33"
Runoff by SCS TR-2Q method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
3,750 98 -Unconnected roofs, HSG C
10,385 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
17,318 98 Paved parking, HSG C
31,453 90 Weighted Average
10,385 33.02% Pervious Area
21,068 66.98% Impervious Area
3,750 17.80% Unconnected
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type N 24-hr 100 yr Raintall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@) 10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fttsec) (cfs)
4.3 35 0.0200 0.14 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
2.2 270 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
6.5 315 Total Summary for Subcatchment 151 S: PR-PO.ND 3
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 2.44 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 7,557 cf, Depth= 3.51
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighte'd-CN, Time Soan= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Ad* Description
375 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
20,077 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
5,400 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
25,852 74 73 Weighted Average, Ul Adjusted
25,477 98.55% Pervious Area
375 1.45% Impervious Area
375 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.4 50 0.1700 0.34 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.3 115 0.1700 6.64 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 10 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.7 175 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 152S: PR-CB 9+50LT
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.96 cis @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 6,416 cf, Depth= 5.45"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-11 Type I//24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30
Area (sf) CN Description
2,625 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
4,401 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,107 98 Paved parking, HSG C
14,133 91 Weighted Average
4,401 31.14% Pervious Area
9,732 68.86% Impervious Area
2,625 26.97% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (Cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0�0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.7 260 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.0 295 Total
Summary for Subcatchment 153S: PR-CB 10+84
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 2.19 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 7,227 cf, Depth= 5.56"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,875 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
3,834 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
9,884 98 Paved parking, HSG C
15,593 92 Weighted Average
3,834 24.59% Pervious Area
11,759 75.41% Impervious Area
1,875 15.95% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ftfsec) (cfs)
3.3 25 0.0200 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.1 165 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
4.4 200 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL—R Type ///24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50!'
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/nOW1 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31
Summary for Subcatchment 154S: PR-C13 9+50RT
[49) Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 2.20 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 7,091 cf, Depth= 5.22"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,875 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
6,425 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
7,998 98 Paved parking, HSG C
16,298 89 Weighted Average
6,425 39.42% Pervious Area
9,873 60.58% Impervious Area
1,875 18.99% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft1sec) (Cfs)
2.7 40 0.0800 0.24 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.0 10 0.0312 3.59 Shallow Concentrated.Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
1.8 280 0.0160 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv=20.3 fps
4.5 330 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 155S: EX-RES 211
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 1.59 cfs.@ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 4,915 cf, Depth= 4.24"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CINI, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
12,285 81 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG C
1,640 70 Woods, Good, HSG C
13,925 80 Weighted Average
10,240 73.53% Pervious Area
3,686 26.47% Impervious Area
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITrAL-R Type I//24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae-32
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.3 50 0.0400 0.19 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.4 55 0.0200 2.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
4.7 105 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Subcatchment 156S: PR-POND 4
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff 2.39 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 7,445 cf, Depth 4.13"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Area (sf) CN Description
1,500 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
.15,295 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C
4,840 91 Rip Rap, HSG C
21,635 79 Weighted Average
20,135 93.07% Pervious Area
1,500 6.93% Impervious Area
1,500 100.00% Unconnected
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet). (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.6 50 0.1500 0.33 Sheet Flowj
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.10"
0.1 20 0.1200 5.58 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.1 30 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
0.0 25 0.3300 9.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
2.8 125 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 5.0 min
Summary for Pond.7813: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (infiltration System #11)
[93] Warning: Storage range exceeded by 1.97'
[87] Warning: Oscillations may require smaller dt or Finer Routing (severity=1 13)
Inflow Area 14,971 sf, 50.97% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.86" for 100 yr event
Inflow 1.89 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 6,057 cf
Outflow 0.70 cfs @ 12.50 hrs, Volume= 3,230 cf, Atten= 63%, Lag= 25.5 min
Discarded 0.01 cfs @ 8.05 hrs, Volume= 1,187 cf
Secondary 0.69 cfs @ 12.50 hrs, Volume= 2,043 cf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL- R
Prepared by Microsoft Type ///24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Printed .9/18/2015
iHydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions ILLC Page 33
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 127.91' @ 12.50 hrs Surf.Area= 1,489 sf Storage= 3,361 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 392.8 min calculated for 3,226 cf(53% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 282.0 min ( 1,072.1 - 790.1 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 122.40' 1,274 cf 25.67W x 58.001 x 3.54'H Field A
5,272 ef Overall - 2,086 cf Embedded 3,186 cf x 40.0% Voids
#2A 122.90' 2,086 cf Cultec R-330XL x 40 Inside #1
Effective Size= 47.8'W x 30.0"H => 7.45 sf x 7.00'L= 52.2 cf
Overall S izq= 52.0"W x 30.5"H x 8.501 with 1.50' Overlap
5 Rows of 8 Chambers
3,361 cf Total Avaifable Storage
-Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 122AO' 0.270 in/hr Extiltration over Surface area
#2 Secondary 127.75' 4.0' long x:1.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31
3.30 ,3.31 3.32
Piscarded OutFlow Max=0.011 cis @ 8.05 hrs HW=122.46' (Free Discharge)
F-I=Exriltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)
�!econdary OutFlow Max=0.65 efs @ 12:50 hrs HW=127.90' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
2=Brdad-Crested'Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.65 cfs @ 1.06 fps)
Summary for Pond 142P: Detention Pond I
Inflow Area 60,064 sf, 24.18% Impervious, InflowDepth = 4.12" for 100yrevent
'Inflow 6.56 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 20,636 cf
Outflow 4107 cfs @ , 12.18 hrs, Volume= 20,315 cf, Atten= 38%, Lag= 6.3 min
-Discarded .0.02 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= .817 cf
Primary 4.05-cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 19,498 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak'Elev= 135.34' @ 12.18 hrs Surf.Area= 2,449 sf Storage= 4,851 cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 3,660 sf Storage= 8,258 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 66.2 min calculated for 20,289 cf(98% of inflow)
C-driter-of-Mass det. time= 57.8 min ( 867.1 - 809.3
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis -Revised 8/3112015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R - Type ///24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s1n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 34
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 132.00' 8,258 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
132.00 600 0 0
133.00 1,060 830 830
134.00 1,590 1,325 2,155
135.00 2,210 1,900 4,055
136.00 2,910 2,560 6,615
136.50 3,660 1,643 8,258
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 . Primary 131.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L=,175.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet InVert= 131.50'/ 129.75' S= 0.0100 7' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 Device 1 132.75' 4.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#3 Device 1 134.00' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 134.50' 10.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#5 Secondary 1136.00� 8.0' long.x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.66
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
#6 Discarded 132.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltratlon over Surface area
Discarded OutFlomi Max=0,02 ofs @ 12.18 hrs HW=135.33' (Free Discharge)
t--6--Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=4.03 ofs @ 12.18 hrs HW=135.33' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
=Culvert (Passes 4.03 cfs of 6.19 cfs potential flow)
u
2oOrific6/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.65 cfs @ 7.49 fps)
0
3=Oriflce/Qrate (Orifice Controls 1.68 cfs @ 4.82 fps)
-Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.70 cfs @ 3.11 fps)
§econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs_@ 0.00 hrs HW=132.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
L-6=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Surfirnary for Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2
Inflow Area 44,298 sf, 45.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.80" for 100 yr event
Inflow 5.47 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 17,706 cf
Outflow 0.29 cfs @ 14.19 hrs, Volume= 16,823 cf, Atten= 95%, Lag= 127.0 min
Discarded 0.03 cfs @ 14.19 hrs, Volume= 2,514 cf
Primary 0.26 cfs @ 14.19 hrs, Volume= 14,309 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 Cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL R Type /I/24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@)10.00-15 s/n06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35
Peak Elev= 131.20' @ 14.19 hrs Surf.Area= 4,514 sf Storage= 10,561 cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 6,340 sf Storage= 17,293 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 449.1 min calculated for 16,802 cf(95% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 421.9 min ( 1,213.7 - 791.8
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 128.00' 17,293 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Usted below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
128.00 1,800 0 0
128.50 2,560 1,090 1,090
129.00 2,890 1,363 2,453
130.00 3,590 3,240 5,693
131.00 4,350 3,970 9,663
132.00 5,160 4,755 14,418
132.50 6,340 2,875 17,293
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 127.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 16.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 127.50'/ 127.00' S= 0.0313 ? Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, FlowArea= 0.79sf
#2 �Secondary 132.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
#3 Discarded 128.00' 0.270 in/hr Exifiltration over Surface area
#4 Device 1 128.501 2.5"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
�iscarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 14.19 hrs HW=1 31.20' (Free Discharge)
!3=Exfiltratlon (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=0.26 cfs @ 14.19 hrs HW=1 31.20' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
't--I=Culvert (Passes 0.26 cfs of 6.77 cfs potential flow)
t-4--Oriflce/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.26 cfs @ 7.76 fps)
§econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 28.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
-F-2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Summary for Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4
Inflow Area 67,659 sf, 48.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.00" for 100 yr event
Inflow 8.76 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volurne= 28,178 cf
Outflow 2.41 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 27,447 cf, Atten= 72%, Lag= 20.9 min
Discarded 0.03 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 1,330 cf
Primary 2.38 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 26,117 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volurne= 0 Gf
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015- The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-IR Type ///24-hr 100 yr Raintall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 36
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 121.06' @ 12.42 h rs Surf.Area= 4,561 sf Storage= 9,882 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 97.1 min calculated for 27,447 cf(97% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 81.4 min ( 869.1 - 787.6 ) I
Volume Invert AvaiI.Storage Storage Description
#1 117.00' 18,006 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
117.00 790 0 0
118.00 1,460 1,125 1,125
119.00 2,230 1,845 2,970
120.00 3.285 2,758 5,728
121.00 4,480 3,883 9,610
122.00 5,825 5,153 14,763
122.50 7,150 3,244 18,006
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 114.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 13.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 114.50'/ 114.00' S= 0.03857' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010,' Flow Area= 0.79 sf
#2 Discarded 117.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#3 Device 1 118.00' 6.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 120.50' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#5 Secondary 122.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83
eiscarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 12.42 hrs HW=121.06' (Free Discharge)
2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls O.03cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=2.38 cfs @ 12.42 hrs HW=121.06' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
't-I=Culvert (Passes 2.38 cfs of 9.31 cfs potential flow)
tOrifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.58 cfs @ 8.07 fps)
:�__Orlfice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.79 cfs @ 2.54 fps)
§econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 efs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 17.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
T5=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands - Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type /11 24-hr 100 yr Raintall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/18/2015
HydroCAD@10.00-15 s/n06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37
Summary for Pond 15212: Detention Pond 3
Inflow Area 57,305 sf, 37.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.51" for 100 yr event
Inflow 6.56 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 21,537 cf
Outflow 2.10 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 21,049 cf, Atten= 68%, Lag= 19.0 min
Discarded 0.02 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 2,062 cf
Primary 2.07 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 18,987 cf
Secondary 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3
Peak Elev= 117.35' @ 12.41 hrs Surf.Area= 3,938 sf Storage= 7,097 cf
Flood Elev= 136.50' Surf.Area= 5,400 sf Storage= 12,340 ef
Plug-Flow detention time= 109.4 min calculated for 21,023 cf(98% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 96.9 min ( 894.9 - 798.1
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 115.00' 12,340 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
115.00 2,200 0 0
116.00 2,870 2,535 2,535
117.00 3,600 3,235 5,770
118.00 4,560 4,080 9,850
118.50 5,400 2,490 12,340
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 113.50' 12.0" Round Culvert
L= 10.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 113.50'/ 113.00' S= 0.0500 'P Cc= 0.900
n= 0.010, Flow Area= 0.79 sf
#2 Device 1 115-50' 8.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#3 Secondary 118.00' 8.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65
2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2,69 2.72 2.76 2.83
#4 Discarded 115.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
Piscarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=1 17.35' (Free Discharge)
_F-�-Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=2.07 cfs @ 12.41 hrs HW=1 17.35' TW=0.00' (Dy namic Tailwater)
'1_tCulvert (Passes 2.07 cfs of 6.92 cfs potential flow)
_(2=Oriflce/Grate (Orifice Controls 2.07 cfs @ 5.93 fps)
tecondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=1 15.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater)
3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Proposed Condition Watershed Analysis - Revised 8/31/2015-The Woodlands -Salem MA
proposed-SUBMITTAL-R Type ///24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50"
Prepared by Microsoft Printed. 9/118/2015
HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 06611 Q 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC' Padej3a
Summary for Link 109L: Total Surface Runoff discharging 4rom projed area
Inflow Area 751,980 sf, 20.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.76" for 100 yr event
Inflow 42.85 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 235,581 cf
Primary 42.85 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 235,581 cf, Aft6n= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 128L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the north
Inflow Area 315,936 sf, 19.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.77" for 100 yr event
Inflow 16.57 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 99,298 cf
Primary 16.57 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 99,298 cf, Atten=-0%, Lag= 0.0 min -
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 130L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "B" series
Inflow Area 70,668sf, 4.80% Impervious, InflowDepth = 3.41" for 100yrevent ,
Inflow 4.97cfs@ 12.20hrs, Volume= 20,063 cf
Primary 4.97 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 20,063 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 132L: Runoff towards Clark Avenue Drainage System .
Inflow Area 123,289 sf, 42.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.28" for 100yr event
Inflow 13.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs Volume= 43,959 cf ' t .
Primary 13.33cfs@ 12.07hrs: Volume= 43,959cf, Aften= O%, Lag= O.Omlfi
Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 139L: Runoff towards existing wetlands to the south
Inflow Area 436,044 sf, 21.03% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.76" for 100 yr event
Inflow 27.44 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 136,282 cf
Primary 27.44 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 136,282 cf, Atten�_ 0%, Lag= 0.0,min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Summary for Link 141L: Runoff towards Isolated Wetland "C" seriev
Inflow.Area 49,862sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.21" forlOOyreve nt
Inflow 3.47cfs@ 12.17hrs, Volume= 13,326 cf
Primary 3.47 cfs @ 12,17 hrs, Volume= 13,326 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-40.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
EM
0
ONE so
slown lc"d:.
or. nip
No m
NET
0
NO
0
MW
E77M TITTOlual
ONE
....... ......
SENSE MEME M�m SEEM
rt-11"EURN X 1113m,
MOONS 0 ONO
0 N
MUM
OWN
mom
No ME
Ell
mom
ME
zw T,
In
V
INSTRUCTIONS: Version 1,Automated. Mar. 4,2008
1. In BMP Column, click on Blue Cell to Activate Drop Down Menu
2. Select BMP from Drop Down Menu
3. After BMP is selected, TSS Removal and other Columns are automatically completed.
142P _.43P 15 Pj&'
Location: knii'L.ir pritJor'], 2 1
B C D E F
TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining
BMP1 Rate' Load* Removed (C*D) L2a�-E
bep urnp�pnd ]Hlood_
:'."'-:I 1 '11,
Catdh.Baisin 'rf,
F 0.25 0.75
4) P -'s
4) :, 0.25 1.00
o 0 sedirribiliff"re ay, 0.26
D F70.76 0.19 0.66
0 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.56
0.0
0 0.56 0.00 0
0.00 0.56 L 0.00 IF 0.56
Separate Form Needs to
be Completed for Each
Total TSS Removal W16 Outlet or BMP Train
Project: SALE4626'
0M
Prepared By: B *Equals remaining load from previous BMP (E)
Date: 1
1111W 6
which enters the BMP
Non-automated TSS Calculation Sheet
must be used if Proprietary BMP Proposed
1. From MassDEP Stormwater Handbook Vol. 1 Mass. Dept.of Environmental Protection
V
INSTRUCTIONS: Version 1,Automated:Mar. 4,2008
1. In BMP Column, click on Blue Cell to Activate Drop Down Menu
2. Select BMP from Drop Down Menu
3. After BMP is selected, TSS Removal and other Columns are automatically completed.
Location: 16�tenii�ontiasirs' ;�14_Z�"I 4413".J 52P &4441?�,
B C D E F
TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining
BMP' Rate' Load* Removed (C*D) Load (D-E)
P
date n.,.
0.25 1.00 .26 0.76
0.60 o.i5
>
0 0 0.80 0.75
0.00 0.15
0 0.00 0.15
0.0
0.15 0.00 0.15
d_*
0.15 0.00
EO-00 L-0-15
Separate F rm Needs to
be Completed for Each
Tota I TSS Removal 86% Outlet or BMP Train
Project:
Prepared BY: *Equals remaining load from previous BMP (E)
Date: '�i4 44AS-
which enters the BMP
Non-automated TSS Calculation Sheet 9eq- 4810&1116-
must be used N Proprietary BMP Proposed
1. From MassDEP Stormwater Handbook Vol. 1 Mass.Dept of Environmental Protection
V
INSTRUCTIONS: Version 1,Automated.,Mar. 4,2008
1. In BMP Column, click on Blue Cell to Activate Drop Down Menu
2. Select BMP from Drop Down Menu
3. After BMP is selected, TSS Removal and other Columns are automatically completed.
Location:
B C D E ' F
TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining
BMP1 Rate' Load* Removed (C*D) Load (D-E)
4) 'Deep,86hrip indli�'6"d'
Q �CAktf Basin- 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.75
0.75 0.19
>
G it,
r Aeparatolii1'_, 0.56
0 0 0.25
E
0
0.00 0.56 0.00 0.56
75
0.00
J 0.00 0.56 _F o56
0
0.00 0.56 .00 0.56
:0 IF—
Separate Form Needs to
be Completed for Each
Total TSS Removal 44% Outlet or BMP Train
P roj 11ALE-60-26 tI
ect:
Prepared By: p *Equals remaining load from previous BMP (E)
Date: 31-' U 6 1 which enters the BMP
Non-automated TSS Calculation Sheet
must be used if Proprietary BMP Proposed
1. From MassDEP Stormwater Handbook Vol. 1 Mass. Dept.of Environmental Protection
V
INSTRUCTIONS: Version 1,Automated.,Mar 4,2008
1. In BMP Column, click on Blue Cell to Activate Drop Down Menu
2. Select BMP from Drop Down Menu
3. After BMP is selected, TSS Removal and other Columns are automatically completed.
Location:N�4 ;6(64— oc;&i
B C D E F
TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining
BMP' Rate' Load* Removed (C*D) Load �D-E)
e h
0.25 1.00 0.25
0.75
0
> Su,
0 0 0.80 0.75
0.15
0
0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15
0.00 0.15 0.00 0.16
.00 0.15
0.00 000 L
0.15 ---]Outlet or BMP Train
Separate Form Needs to
Total TSS Removal 815% be Completed for Each
Project: .......
Prepared By: P46
*Equals remaining load from previous BMP (E)
Date: �144,i which enters the BMP
Non-automated TSS Calculation Sheet
must be used if Proprietary BMP Proposed
1.From MassDEP Stormwater Handbook Vol. 1 Mass. Dept of Environmental Protection
VFW
---�- -Xmalw
MEN MEN
IMF
0 0
0
, ,&
W'D
m
0 on
NEW
l I Id
9091
NNW
m
w Z,M 7-AVW LIN m
IN P-Opm
Elm
0 VE
..-Em.m ...@-I-
ME OR
MINE
MUL&I i oil
............
Nor
MIA
A
WON
FOR
umm 0
ON
.Mol
TI U(PW
0
MM
om
mom
am
mom
EMN
MEL" i oil
M Fm
E .... ...........
10
ev
GRATE OPENING RATI
P-1-7/8-4 L:
0.6
P-1-7/8 0.9
It 11 /1 / ,
5 P-1-1/8 06
4 RefiCulind 0�8
Cwved van$ 0.35 T-
30' tilt-b& 0.34
3
Tested
0-8 -
6 —
O�5 CURB
0.4 —
0. " — W
0.3 — 9 - 0, w i
L ---1
0.2 A-CLEAR OPENING AREA
P- 2W + L (WITH CURB)
-P -Z(W+L) (WITHOUT CURB)
0.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I I
1 2 3 4 5 6 a 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100
01SCUME a 3/8)
2—Y, -2� 6
CHART 11. Grate inlet capacity in sump conditions.
IA�—tZ MkQUbU
01P 01L,+kVA" IPN\Jewq�
�Aftgc-kA
71
Klima
NOW p
PIMP
m 0 no
No
0 mmm
m 9 IT
A
ON won 0 m m
now 0
0 INS
ON
No
100
Elmo M ON
mom No rl
mom
0
man
momMM ON
MEN ON
ONES
ON
mom
0
Lm- W.
MOMM MOM M
on
ME ON FV
ir. 31
ON m
0 MOMMIS
0
No
0
IS
10OYearStorrnff�nt
HY-8 Analysis Results
Culvert Summary Table - 18" HDPE
Culvert Crossing: 12etention Pond 1 Pipe In
tal ulvert Headwa Inlet utlet Flow 4orrnal dtical Outlet Tailwwate utlet ailwaie
ischar ischar ter Controll ontrol Type )epth )epth Depth r Depth locity
e(cfs) e(cfs) Elevatio Depth(ft epth(ft) ft) ft) (ft) (ft) S) locipy
n(ft) S
72 .72 135.51 1.25 .51 4-FFf ).75 ).83 1.50 135.20 .67 .00
.90 .90 135.54 1.28 .54 4-FFf ).76 ).85 1.50 135.20 .78 .00
.09 .09 135.56 1.31 .56 4-FFf ).78 ).86 1.50 135.20 .88 .00
U
I
s
7
9 ven
char
(c,�)
2
0
09
27
.4
.27 .27 135.59 1.34 .59 4-FFf ).80 ).88 1.50 135.20 .98 .00
46 .46 135.62 1.37 .62 FFf .81 .90 1.50 135.20 .09 .00
r
.64 .64 135.65 1.40 .65 FFf .83 .91 1�50 135.20 .19 .00
.82 .82 135.68 1.43 .68 FFf .85 .93 1.50 135.20 .30 .00
01 .01 135.71 1.46 .71 FFf .87 .94 1.50 135.20 .40 .00
.19 .19 135.74 1.49 74 FFf .88 .96 1.50 135.20 .50 .00
.38 .38 135.77 1.53 .77 Ff .90 .97 1.50 135.20 .61 .00
.7
.56 .56 135.81 1.66 .81 FFf 1.92 1.99 1.50 135.20 171 .00
V-k&A 0;- cl. = k STb, t A-
SkC> SOCC4,10<L415N
100 Year Storm Event
HY-8 Analysis Results
Culvert Summary Table - 16" HDPE
Culvert Crossing: Detention Pond 2 Pipe In
Total ulvert Headwa Net udet Flow 4ormall ritical Dutlet Tailwate uget lwaie-
Dischar ischar ter -,-,-ontrol ontrol Type Depth epth Depth r Depth locity
ge(cfs) e(cfs) Elevatio 3epth(ft epth(ft) (ft) a) [:ocity
n(ft) WS)
0,29 29 116,01 ),21 0* I-S2n ),13 21 1,13 130,19 35 10.00
0-81 .81 136.28 ).47 .0* 1-S2n ).23 .35 ).23 130.19 .37 .00
u
'ver'
char
c's)
je le
29
1 8 1
1.33 .33 136.43 ).62 .0* 1-S2n ).28 .45 ):28 130.19 .29 .00
1
1.84 .84 136.57 ).76 .0* I-S2n ).34 .54 ).34 130.19 .81 .00
3 1
6 .36 136.70 0.89 .0* 1-S2n .38 .61 .38 130.19 .48 .00
88 .88 136.81 1.00 .0* -S2n .43 168 .43 130.19 .76 .00
0 1
.40 .40 136.93 1.J2 .0* -S2n .47 .74 .47 130.19 .12 .00
92 92 137,04 1,23 .0' 1-S2n -50 �80 .50 130.19 .49 .00
.43 .43 137.16 1.35 .0* -S2n .54 .85 .54 1130!;1;1 71 .00
.95 .95 137.28 1.47 .0* -S2n .58 90 .58 1130.19 .95 V.00
-S2n .61 -,94 .62 1130.19 19.08 10.00
.61
.47 47 137.42 -110*
t� ?4VA Of T"i;,4
t-kc Sut.QVW4�61"Gr ,
100 Year Storm Event
HY-8 Analysis Results
Culvert Summary Table - 12" HDPE
Culvert Crossing: Detention Pond 3 Pipe In
Total ulvert Head*a Inlet :)utlet Flow qormal critical Met Tailwate uttet ailwate
Dischar ischar ter Control '-ontrol Type 3epth Depth )epth r Depth elocity
ge(cfs) a (cfs) Elevatio Depth(ft) Depth(ft) ft) (ft) ft) (ft) S) locity
n(111) S)
2.13 .13 145.12 0.94 ).0* 1-S2n .34 .62 ).34 116.87 .97 .00
2.57 .57 145.26 1.08 ).0* 5�S2n .38 .68 ).38 116.87 .46 .00
3.02 02 145.42 1.24 ).0* 5-S2n .41 .74 ).41 116.87 .93 .00
u
s
1
5
Ivent
char
a
A
ft/ a
ft/
3
7
2 1 C
C
0
3.46 .46 145.59 1.41 ).0* 5-S2n .45 .79 ).45 116-87 .99 .00
90 .90 145.80 .62 .0* 15-S2n .48 .84 .49 116.87 0.28 .00
.34 .34 146.03 .85 .0* 15-S2n .51 .87 .52 116.87 0.49 .00
.79 .79 146.29 .11 .0* -S2n .54 .91 .56 116.87 0.69 .00
23123 146.58 .40 .20 -S2n .57 .93 .59 116.87 10.89 .00
.67 .67 146.90 .72 .69 -S2n .60 .94 .62 11&87 11.10 .00
1
.12 .12 147.24- .06 1.00 -S2n .63 .93 .65 116.87 11.27 .00
.56 .56 147.62 1.44 1.46 I-S2n 1.67 1.96 1.69 116.87 11.40 1.00
IT" HVfe: OL
CA<-&
P00 Year Storm Event
HY-8 Analysis Results
Culvert Summary Table - 18" HDPE
Culvert Crossing: Detention Pond 4 Pine In
j tai ulvert Headwa Inlet utlet Flow Nlonnal ritical Met Tailwate outlet ailwate
ischar ischar ter Control ontrol Type :)epth )epth )epth r Depth Velocity
e Ids) e(cfs) Elevatio Depth(ft epth(ft) :ft) ft) ft) (ft) INS) locity
n(ft) S
57 .57 141.77 0.77 .0* 1-S2n ).25 ).60 ).25 120.46 12.80 .00
.19 .19 141.90 0.90 .0* 1-S2n ).29 ).68 ).29 120.46 13.74 -00
.61 81 142.01 1.01 .0* I-S2n ).31 ).75 ).33 120.46 13.03 .00
u
S
'vert
char
cfs) ]In
let
ont'o'
e epth(ft)
57 0 77
19 0.go
.81 1.0 1
.43 .43 142.12 1.12 .0* 1-S2n ).33 ).81 03 120.46 15.06 .00
05 .05 142.22 1.22 .0* -S2n .36 .86 .36 120.46 15.60 .00
.66 .66 142.32 1.32 .0* -S2n .38 .91 .40 120.46 14.88 .00
1
.28 .28 142.42 1.42 .0* -S2n .40 .96 .40 120.46 16.43 .00
90 .90 142.53 1.53 .0* -S2n .42 1.01 .42 120.46 16.97 .00
.52 .52 142.64 1.64 .0* -S2n .44 1.06 .44 120.46 17.54 .00
1 1 6
.14 .14 142.76 1.76 .0* -S2n .46 1.10 .46 120.46 18.04 .00
.76 .76 142.89 1.89 .0* IS2n 1.48 1.14 1.48 120.46 18.15 1.00
�AK Of OtAli,4 t&+(0(r = t", �
Nib 6 V4440^1-'(n I 4L ov.
Oce I
100 Year Storm Event
HY-8 Analysis Results
Culvert Summary Table - 12" HDPE(Copy)
Culvert Crossing: Cultec System Pipe In
.2 Jrole, ulvert Headw3 nlet ulet Flow 4ormal �',itical outlet Tai*v3te 3utlet railwat;
3ischar ischar ter "'---ontrol ontrol Type 3epth )epth Depth r Depth /elocfty ,
)e(cfs) e(cfs) Elevatio 3epth( epth(ft) ft) ft) (ft) (ft) ft/S) Jelocity
n(ft) :fus)
),01 04 127,91 1,08 66 4-FFf 104 04 1,00 127,91 ),05 100
).05 .05 127.91 MO .66 4-FFf ).06 .05 1.00 127.91 ).06 ).00
0
S
0 Vert
char
(cfs)
4
_5
).08 .06 127.91 ).15 .66 4-FFf ).07 .10 1.00 127.91 ).08 ).00
).12 .08 127.91 ).19 .66 4-FFf ).09 .11 1.00 127.91 ).10 ).00
16 .09 127.91 .24 .66 FFf .09 .12 1.00 127.91 .11 10.00
20 .10 127.91 .32 .66 -FFf .10 .13 1.00 127.91 .13 .00
31 2 127.91 .48 .66 FFf .10 .14 1.00 127.91 .15 .00
27 14 127*111 20 664-FFf .1 1. . .00 127-91 .17 .00
.31 .15 127.91 .21 .66 FFf 12 .16 1.00 127.91 .20 .00
.34 .17 127.91 .23 .66 FFf .12 .16 11!500 127.91 .22 .00
.1 9 5 ; 5
.38 19 127.91 .24 .66 FFf .1 M310.1 127.91 1.24 1.00
'r& f-i§-\ 0 f: 'Wid. CAS C 5TV, 4:A-0
W kL4.- A%-4- Ats #q,.) tev�� 5P.L-t-w*q
vc-.V,-U*-O IN*- S-<97v>.K
'D Vilti J %�Om �t(L-
CA,se
Hydrologic Soil Gmup—Essex County,Massachusetts,Southern Part
(The Woodlands-Clark Avenue,Salem MA)
13
10 34f 34LS20 34 341660 34173D 34= 341870 341940
102C
R
102E
1�21z 73A
5i
V, 102C
53A
PM --
�SZN
34;310 M139D 34145D 3415M MISM 341W 34173D 341WO NIUM M1940
MspScWe:1:3,1701pdnbadMAWIJSMpe(ll"X85")reat
ER
N 0 4S 90 ISO
0 M 300 600 900
MaPPOJecUDn:webMaa�x C�wordnafie;:WWM Edgeto;:UTMZwe19NWGS54
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9118/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page I of 4
Hydrologic Soil Gmup—Essex County,Massachusetts,Southern Part
(The Woodlands-Clark Avenue,Salem MA)
MAPLEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(A0Q N C The soil surveys that comprise your A01 were mapped at 1:15,800.
E] Area of Interest(A01) E CID Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Solis 0 D
Sol]Rating Polygons Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
IN A [3 Not rated or not available misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
AJD Water Features placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Streams and Canals
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
B/D +-" Rails measurements.
rcq C Interstate Highways Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
W-1 CID Web Soil Survey URL: http://websolisumey.n�.usda.gov
US Routes Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
EM D
Major Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
EJ Not rated or not available Local Roads projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Soil Rating Lines distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Background Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate
A Aerial Photography calculations of distance or area are required.
O%o AID This product Is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
B the version date(s)listed below.
BID Soil Survey Area: Essex County,Massachusetts,Southern Part
C SurveyAreaData: VersIon11,Sep19,2014
Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000
CfD or larger.
D Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Aug 10,2014—Aug
0 Not rated or not available 25,2014
Soil Rating Points The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
A compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
AID imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shfiting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
B
B/D
Natural Resources Web Sol)Survey 9118/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—Essex County,Massachusetts,Southern Part The Woodlands-Clark Avenue,
Salem MA
Hydrologic Soil Group
* ic Si�ll p Unit Essex
014- C64nty"-Inai huieitts Southern Part(MA606)
map unit sim6m :�'�Alia it n�' '
n A�res 1 'A61 Percent of A61
gun �v n
53A Freeto"muck,ponded, A/D 0.5 1.1%
0 to I percent slopes
MLRA 144A
73A Whitman loam,0 to 3 D 5.0 10.6%
percent slopes,
extremely stony
102C Chatfield-Hollis-Rock B 5.7 12.1%
outcrop complex,3 to
15 percent slopes
102E Chatfield-Hollis-Rock B 36.1 76.3%
outcrop complex,
35 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 47.31 100.0%
Se
WIF9404L NKOMO CA�9-Vt*noWc,
W`(Srew LAOJO SVUW
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/18/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—Essex County,Massachusetts,Southern Part The Woodlands-Clark Avenue,
Salem MA
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation,are thoroughly wet,and receive precipitation
from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups(A, B, C, and D)and
three dual classes(AID, B/D, and C/D).The groups are defined as follows:
Group A.Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly
wet.These consist mainly of deep,well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands.These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B.Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep,moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These consist
Chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D.Soils having a very slow infiltration rate(high runoff potential)when
thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group(A/D, B/D,or C/D),the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas.Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method., Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/18/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision"The Woodlands"
Clarke Avenue, Salem MA
August 14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Structural Best Management Practices (BMPs)require periodic maintenance to insure proper
function and efficiency in pollutant removal from stormwater discharges that would otherwise
discharge from the proposed impervious areas untreated. Maintenance schedules found below are
as recommended in the manufacturer's specifications.
The following BMPs shall be utilized for project for pollutant removal from stormwater discharge as
well providing additional groundwater recharge on site by directing the proposed runoff to four (4)
surface detenti on ponds and one (1) subsurface infiltration area:
0 Deep Sump Catch Basins with hoods
0 1,500 Gallon Sediment&Oil Separator
0 Street Sweeping
0 Cultec Recharger 330XL Chambers
0 Detention Ponds 1,2,3&4
Deep SRmp Catch Basins with hoods&1,500 Gallon Sediment&Oil Separator:
• Inspect the units at least four times per year with special consideration given to the end of
foliage and snow removal seasons.
• Inspect the condition of the catch basin hoods installed in the outlet pipes from the catch
basins. If damaged,remove and replace with a new unit
• Sediments must also be removed four times per year or whenever the depth of deposits is
greater than or equal to one half the depth from the bottom of the invert of the lowest pipe in
the unit. Clamshell buckets and/or vacuum trucks are typically used to remove sediment in
Massachusetts.
• Catch basin cleanings may be taken to a landfill or other facility pern-dtted by MassDEP to
accept solid waste,without any prior approval by MassDEP. However,some landfills
require catch basin cleanings to be tested before they are accepte d. For information on all of
the MassDEP requirements pertaining to the disposal of catch basin cleanings go to
www.Mass.g�y/dep/recycle/laws/cafacts.doc
Street Swee"m
Street sweeping should be conducted as needed or once minimum per year in the spring
(March or April).
Operation &Maintenance Plan
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
Salem, MA
August 14, 2015
Revised:August 31, 2015
Cultec Recharger 330XL Chambers:
Access to the chambers is through the inspection ports to be located at either end of the row
of chambers where shown on the site plan.
• From the surface,through these inspection ports, the sediment may be measured. A stadia
rod may be used to measure the depth of sediment,if any.
• Once the depth of sediment is in excess of three (3") inches,the affected Cultec Chambers
shall be excavated and the six (6) inch stone bed beneath them is removed and replaced with
clean stone.
0 Should standing water be present in bottom of system during a routine inspection or more
than twenty-four (24)hours after the end of a rainfall event,it may be as a result of the stone
bed layer being clogged with fine particles. The amount of elapsed time required for the
water to infiltrate completely should be recorded. If after seventy-two (72) hours from the
end of a rainfall event there is still standing water in the bottom of the chambers,excavate
the system and replace the stone bed layer with clean stone as mentioned above.
• We recommend the following schedule for system maintenance
Monthly in first year of service:
-Check inlets and outlets for clogging and remove any debris as necessary
-Check for settlement in areas over and surrounding the system
SRring and fall in the second year service:
-Check inlets and outlets for clogging and remove any debris as necessary
-Check for settlement in areas over and surrounding the system
One year after commissioning and evejy year following:.
-Check inlets and outlets for clogging and remove any debris as necessary
-Inspect the interior of the chambers via inspection ports and measure sediment or
depth of standing water
-Check for settlement in areas over and surrounding the system
-Confirm that no unauthorized modifications have been performed to the site
It shoul d be noted that most failures occur in subsurface systems such as these due to
inadequate pre-treatment which leads to clogging. However,with the installation of deep-
sump catch basins with hoods and the Sediment&Oil Separator we do not expect there to be
any adverse impacts to the system due to debris accumulation.
2
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Proposed Cluster Residential Subdivision
Salem, MA
August '14, 2015
Revised: August 31, 2015
Detention Basins:
Detention Basins require small-scale maintenance at regular intervals to evaluate its health
and composition.
• Carefully observe over time. In the first three years after construction,inspect twice a year
during both the growing and non-growing seasons.
• During these inspections,record and map the following information:
Presence of standing water
Vegetative condition(For sides and bottom use a n-dxture of grass seeds capable of
withstanding periodic inundation under water,and,drought tolerant during
summer.
Stability of the sideslopes and berms,
Survival rate of plantings,if any (dead plantings must be replanted)
3
Erosion & Sediment Control Plan
The Woodlands (Clarke Avenu)
Salem, MA
August 31,2015
In order to lindt the amount of erosion and sedimentation that takes place during and after construction,it is
important to implement a management plan,which will protect and limit the amount of land area that is
devoid of vegetation at any given time.
Prior to Construction-Prior to start of construction activities, the owner,builder,and site contractor shall
clearly identify areas that may be affected by the proposed clearing and earth moving activities by reviewing
the approved grading plan as part of an initial site visit. During the site visit, the hn-dt of work line shall be
reviewed to confirm the type of erosion control measure to be used to protect downstream wetland resources
and abutting property. Lin-dts of tree clearing shall be verified during the initial site visit with emphasis on
identifying"save areas" for existing trees and vegetation where practicable.
Erosion and Sediment Control Device
Siltfence and haybales are proposed as the primary erosion control device for this project(see construction
detail provided on the subdivision plan set). It is important for the owner,builder,and/or site contractor to
have access to a supply of haybales should the need arise for additional erosion and sediment control
measures. Haybales can be used along a slope and/or together with siltfence to protect against concentrated
stormwater runoff over exposed surfaces (see attached construction detail for haybale installation). The
erosion and sediment control devices shall be inspected every 7 days or within 24-hours of a 1/2-inch(or
greater) rainfall event to ensure that they are operating properly. If sediment levels begin to build up on the
erosion control devices,it may be necessary to remove the accumulated sediment to ensure that the erosion
control devices continue to operate as designed. Sediment shall be removed if it builds up more than 12-inches
above the ground surface at the erosion control device.
Earth-moving Activities
After trees and other vegetation are cleared,earth-moving(or grading) activities can begin. The approved
grading plan-shall be used to help guide the site contractor during regrading activities. Often times it is
helpful to have a land surveyor establish benchmark elevations and/or lines of grade to aid the site contractor
during regrading activities. This is the time during which the site is most vulnerable to erosion. Therefore,it
is important for the site contractor to finalize grading activities as soon as practicable following land clearing.
Areas than remain exposed longer than 30 working days in an interim condition shall be stabilized in a
temporary fashion. Once final grades have been established,permanent vegetation can be established.
TemRoraEy Seeding
During construction it may be necessary to temporarily stabilize areas that will not be brought to final grade
for a period longer than 30 working days. Temporary seeding is accomplished using fast-growing grass seed
species such as ryegrass. Seeding shall be performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the
Temporary Seeding Guidance,which is an excerpt from a publication entitled, "Massachusetts Erosion and
Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas,May 2003,prepared by Franklin,Hampden,and
Hampshire Conservation Districts."
Erosion &Sediment Control
The Woodlands (Clarke Avenu)
Salem, MA
August 31, 2015
Permanent Seeding&Plantings
Once final grades have been established and the weather pern-dts, every effort shall be made to establish
permanent vegetation on disturbed and exposed areas. In addition to grass seed,tree and shrub plantings
shall be an integral part of the permanent stabilization plan. Care shall be taken by the owner,builder,and/or
site contractor to select trees,shrubs,and seed mixes that are best suited to the soil conditions on the site. Soil
moisture, depth to seasonal groundwater,and exposure to sunlight shall be carefully considered when
selecting species. In recent years, the emphasis on using plant species native to Massachusetts has grown.
Information on the use of non-native and native species can be found on the web and in many local nursery
catalogs.
Permanent seeding shall be performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Permanent Seeding
Guidance,which is an excerpt from a publication entitled,"Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control
Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas,May 2003,prepared by Franklin,Hampden, and Hampshire
Conservation Districts."
2
Attachment A
"Temporary Seeding Guidance Document"
142 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Maintenance
Inspect seeded areas for failure and make necessary repairs and
reseed immediately Conduct or follow-up survey after one year and
replace failed plants where necessary
If vegetative cover is inadequate to prevent rill erosion, overseed and
fertilize in accordance with soil test results.
If a stand has less than 40%cover, reevaluate choice of plant materials
and quantities of lime and fertilizer.Re-establish the stand following
seedbed preparation and seeding recommendations, omitting lime and
fertilizer in the absence of soil test results. If the season prevents resowing,
mulch or jute netting is an effective temporary cover.
Seeded areas should be fertilized during the second growing season.
Lime and fertilize thereafter at periodic intervals,as needed.
0,231"
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Frmion and Sydiment Control Field Man Raleigh, NC, February 1991.
Personal communication, Richard J.DeVergilio, USDA, Natural Resources
Conservation Service,Amherst, MA.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Storm Water Management For
Construction Acfivides, EPA-832-11-92-005,Washington,DC, September, 1992.
Washington State Department of Ecology,Stormwater Management Manual
for the Ltwet Sound Basin, Olympia,WA,February, 1992.
fs! 4-i�3 p - 61
pral
Planting rapid-growing annual grasses, small grains, or legumes to
provide initial,temporary cover for erosion control on disturbed areas.
Purpose
To temporarily stabilize areas that will not be brought to final grade for a
period of more than 30 working days.
To stabilize disturbed areas before final grading or in a season not suitable
for permanent seeding.
Temporary seeding controls runoff and erosion until permanent vegetation
or other erosion control measures can be established.
Root systems hold down the soils so that they are less apt to be carried
offsite by storm water runoff or wind.
Temporary seeding also reduces the problems associated with mud and
dust from bare soil surfaces during construction.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 143
Where Practice Applies
On any cleared, unvegetated, or sparsely vegetated soil surface
where vegetative cover is needed for less than one year.Applications
of this practice include diversions, dams, temporary sediment basins,
temporary road banks,and topsoil stockpiles.
Where permanent structures are to be installed or extensive re-
grading of the area will occur prior to the establishment of permanent
vegetation.
Areas which will not be subjected to heavy wear by construction
traffic.
Areas sloping up to 10% for 100 feet or less,where temporary
seeding is the only practice used.
Advantages
This is a relatively inexpensive form of erosion control but should
only be used on sites awaiting permanent planting or grading.Those
sites should have permanent measures used.
Vegetation will not only prevent erosion from occurring, but will
also trap sediment in runoff from other parts of the site.
Temporary seeding offers fairly rapid protection to exposed areas.
Disadvantages/Problems
Temporary seeding is only viable when there is a sufficient window
in time for plants to grow and establish cover. It depends heavily on the
season and rainfall rate for success.
If sown on subsoil,growth will be poor unless heavily fertilized
and limed.Because overfertilization can cause pollution of stormwater
runoff, other practices such as mulching alone may be more
appropriate. The potential for over-fertilization is an even worse
problem in or near aquatic systems.
Once seeded,areas should not be travelled over.
Irrigation may be needed for successful growth. Regular irrigation
is not encouraged because of the expense and the potential for erosion
in areas that are not regularly inspected.
Planning Considerations
Temporary seedings provide protective cover for less than
one year.Areas must be reseeded annual or planted with perennial
vegetation.
Temporary seeding is used to protect earthen sediment control
practices and to stabilize denuded areas that will not be brought
into final grade for several weeks or months. Temporary seeding can
provide a nurse crop for permanent vegetation,provide residue for soil
protection and seedbed preparation, and help prevent dust production
during construction.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
144 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Use low-maintenance native species wherever possible.
Planting should be timed to minimize the need for irrigation.
Sheet erosion, caused by the impact of rain on bare soil, is the
source of most fine particles in sediment.To reduce this sediment load
in runoff, the soil surface itself should be protected.The most efficient
and economical means of controlling sheet and rill erosion is to establish
vegetative cover.Annual plants which sprout rapidly and survive for only
one growing season are suitable for establishing temporary vegetative
cover. Temporary seeding is effective when combined with construction
phasing so bare areas of t'he site are minimized at all times.
Temporary seeding may prevent costly maintenance operations on
other erosion control systems. For example, sediment basin clean-outs will
be reduced if the drainage area of the basin is seeded where grading and
construction are not taking place. Perimeter dikes will be more effective if
not choked with sediment.
Proper seedbed preparation and the use of quality seed are important
in this practice just as in permanent seeding. Failure to carefully follow
sound agronomic recommendations will often result in an inadequate
stand of vegetation that provides little or no erosion control.
Soil that has been compacted by heavy traffic or machinery may
need to be loosened. Successful growth usually requires that the soil be
tilled before the seed is applied.Topsoiling is not necessary for temporary
seeding; however,it may improve the chances of establishing temporary
vegetation in an area.
Planting Procedures
Time of Planting
Planting should preferably be done between April I and June 30, and
September I through September 30. If planting is done in the months of
July and August, irrigation may be required. If planting is done between
October 1 and March 31, mulching should be applied immediately after
planting. If seeding is done during the summer months, irrigation of some
sort will probably be necessary.
Site Preparation
Before seeding, install needed surface runoff control measures such as
gradient terraces, interceptor dike/swales,level spreaders, and sediment
basins.
Seedbed Preparation
The seedbed should be firm with a fairly fine surface.
Perform all cultural operations across or at right angles to the slope.
See Topsoffing and Surface Roughening for more information on seedbed
preparation.A minimum of 2 to 4 inches of tilled topsoil is required.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
r
N
1
1
1
1
i
I
i '
1 '
1 '
Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 145
Liming and Fertilization
Apply uniformly 2 tons of ground limestone per acre (100 lbs. per
1,000 Sq. Ft.) or according to soil test.
Apply uniformly 10-10-10 analysis fertilizer at the rate of 400 lbs. per
acre(14 lbs. per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)or as indicated by soil test.Forty percent of
the nitrogen should be in organic form.
Work in lime and fertilizer to a depth of 4 inches using any suitable
equipment.
mji&4—r
yE
�4 N.N
Pig,�Ies h'
;wew
4,,Apin
At MY,
WJI tit 6 r Rye P,
ig t'ij
ropha e�se ii
Seeding
Select adapted species from the accompanying table.
Apply seed uniformly according to the rate indicated in the table by
broadcasting, drilling or hydraulic application.
Cover seeds with suitable equipment as follows:
Rye grass V4 inch
�Millet Ih to 3/4 inch
�Oats I to 1-1/2 inches
�Winter rye I to 1-1/2 inches.
Mulch
Use an effective mulch,such as clean grain straw;tacked and/or tied
down with netting to protect seedbed and encourage plant growth.
Common Trouble Points
Lime andjertilizer not incorporated to at least 4 inches
May be lost to runoff or remain concentrated near the surface where they
may inhibit germination.
Mulch rate inadequate or straw mulch not tacked down
Results in poor germination or failure, and erosion damage.Repair
damaged areas, reseed and mulch.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
146 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Annual ryegrass usedfor temporary seeding
Ryegrass reseeds itself and makes it difficult to establish a good cover of
permanent vegetation.
Seed not broadcast evenly or rate too low
Results in patchy growth and erosion.
Maintenance
Inspect within 6 weeks of planting to see if stands are adequate.
Check for damage after heavy rains. Stands should be uniform and dense.
Fertilize, reseed, and mulch damaged and sparse areas immediately.Tack
or tie down mulch as necessary.
Seeds should be supplied with adequate moisture.Furnish water as
needed,especially in abnormally hot or dry weather or on adverse sites.
Water application rates should be controlled to prevent runoff.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Office of
Watershed Management, Nonpoint Source Program,Massachusetts
Nonvoint Source Manarement Manual, Boston, Massachusetts,June, 1993.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Erosion and Sediment Control Field Mang Raleigh,NC,February 1991.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Storm Water Management For
Construction Activities, EPA-832-R-92-005,Washington,DC,September, 1992.
Washington State Department of Ecology,Stormwater Management Manual
for the Puret SoundRasin, Olympia,WA,February, 1992.
1��k�
07"',
$T.17420=�
s' 'i I 64i i ii
A temporary sediment barrier installed parallel to the bank of a
stream or lake. Used to contain the sediment produced by construction
operations on the bank of a stream or lake and allow for its removal.
Where Practice Applies
The silt curtain is used along the banks of streams or lakes where
sediment could pollute or degrade the stream or lake.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Attachment B
"Permanent Seeding Guidance Document"
132 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Maintenance
The effective life of a sediment trap depends upon adequate
maintenance.The trap should be readily accessible for periodic
maintenance and sediment removal.
Set a stake at one-half the design depth.This will be the "cleanout
level." Remove sediment when it has accumulated to one-half the design
depth.
Inspect sediment traps after each significant rainfall event. Repair any
erosion and piping holes immediately.
Clean or replace spillway gravel facing if clogged.
Promptly replace any displaced riprap, being careful that no stones in
the spillway are above design grade.
Inspect vegetation; reseed and remulch if necessary.
Check spillway depth periodically to ensure minimum of 1.5 it depth
from lowest point of the settled embankment to highest point of spillway
crest. Fill any low areas of the embankment to maintain design elevation.
After all sediment-producing areas have been stabilized, inspected,
and approved, remove the structure and all unstable sediment.Smooth site
to blend with adjoining areas and stabilize in accordance with vegetation
plan.
r rph.
en
Minnick, E. L.,and H.T. Marshall,Stormwater Manarement and Erosion
Control&r Urban and DevelayinE Areas inNewHampshire, Rockingham
County Conservation District,August 1992.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Frmion and Sediment Control Field Mmual,Raleigh, NC, February 199 1.
U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,Storm Water Management For
Construction Activities, EPA-832-R-92-005,Washington,DC, September, 1992.
Washington State Department of Ecology,Stormwater Management Manual
for the Puget Sound Basin, Olympia,WA, February, 1992.
V,
'lilt
UN
'f�e es blishment of perennial vegetative cover on disturbed areas.
Purpose
Permanent seeding of grass and planting trees and shrubs provides
stabilization to the soil by holding soil particles in place.
Vegetation reduces sediments and runoff to downstream areas by
slowing the velocity of runoff and permitting greater infiltration of the
runoff.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 133
Vegetation also filters sediments, helps the soil absorb water,
improves wildlife habitats, and enhances the aesthetics of a site.
Where Practice Applies
- Permanent seeding and planting is appropriate for any graded or
cleared area where long-lived plant cover is needed to stabilize the soil.
— Areas which will not be brought to final grade for a year or more.
— Some areas where permanent seeding is especially important are filter
strips, buffer areas,vegetated swales, steep slopes,and stream banks.
� This practice is effective on areas where soils are unstable because of
their texture or structure, high water table,winds, or steep slope.
Advantages
Advantages of seeding over other means of establishing plants
include the small initial establishment cost, the wide variety of grasses
and legumes available, low labor requirement,and ease of establishment
in difficult areas.
Seeding is usually the most economical way to stabilize large areas.
Well established grass and ground covers can give an aesthetically
pleasing, finished look to a development.
Once established,the vegetation will serve to prevent erosion and
retard the velocity of runoff.
Disadvantag es/Problerns
Disadvantages which must be dealt with are the potential for
erosion during the establishment stage, a need to reseed areas that fail
to establish, limited periods during the year suitable for seeding, and a
need for water and appropriate climatic conditions during germination.
Vegetation and mulch cannot prevent soil slippage and erosion if soil is
not inherently stable.
Coarse, high grasses that are not mowed can create a fire hazard in
some locales.Very short mowed grass, however, provides less stability
and sediment filtering capacity.
Grass planted to the edge of a watercourse may encourage fertilizing
and mowing near the water's edge and increase nutrient and pesticide
contamination.
Depends initially on climate and weather for success.
May require regular irrigation to establish and maintain.
Planning considerations
Selection of the right plant materials for the site, good seedbed
preparation,timing, and conscientious maintenance are important.
Whenever possible, native species of plants should be used for
landscaping.These plants are already adapted to the locale and
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
134 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
survivability should be higher than with "introduced"species.
Native species are also less likely to require irrigation,which can be
a large maintenance burden and is neither cost-effective nor ecologically
sound.
If non-native plant species are used,they should be tolerant of a large
range of growing conditions, as low-maintenance as possible, and not
invasive.
Consider the microclimate within the development area. Low areas
may be frost pockets and require hardier vegetation since cold air tends to
sink and flow towards low spots.South-facing slopes may be more difficult
to re-vegetate because they tend to be sunnier and drier.
Divert as much surface water as possible from the area to be planted.
Remove seepage water that would continue to have adverse effects
on soil stability or the protecting vegetation.Subsurface drainage or other
engineering practices may be needed. In this situation, a permit may be
needed from the local Conservation Commission: check ahead of time to
avoid construction delays.
Provide protection from equipment, trampling and other destructive
agents.
Vegetation cannot be expected to supply an erosion control cover and
prevent slippage on a soil that is not stable due to its texture, structure,
water movement,or excessive slope.
Seeding Grasses and Legumes
Install needed surface runoff control measures such as gradient terraces,
berms,dikes, level spreaders, waterways, and sediment basins prior to
seeding or planting.
Seedbed Preparation
If infertile or coarse-textured subsoil will be exposed during land shaping,
it is best to stockpile topsoil and respread it over the finished slope at
a minimum 2-to 6-inch depth and roll it to provide a firm seedbed.If
construction fill operations have left soil exposed with a loose, rough,or
irregular surface,smooth with blade and roll.
Loosen the soil to a depth of 3-5 inches with suitable agricultural or
construction equipment.
Areas not to receive top soil shall be treated to firm the seedbed after
incorporation of the lime and fertilizer so that it is depressed no more
than �6- I inch when stepped on with a shoe.Areas to receive topsoil
shall not be firmed until after topsoiling and lime and fertilizer is applied
and incorporated, at which time it shall be treated to firm the seedbed as
described above. This can be done by rolling or cultipacking.
Cool Season Grasses
Cool Season Grasses grow rapidly in the cool weather of spring and fall,
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 135
and set seed in June and July. Cool season grasses become dormant
when summer temperatures persist above 85 degrees and moisture is
scarce.
Lime and Fertilizer
Apply lime and fertilizer according to soil test and current Extension
Service recommendations. In absence of a soil test, apply lime(a pH of
5.5-6.0 is desired)at a rate of 2.5 tons per acre and 10-20-20 analysis
fertilizer at a rate of 5GO pounds per acre(40 % of N to be in an organic
or slow release form). Incorporate lime and fertilizer into the top 2-3
inches of soil.
Seeding Dates
Seeding operations should be performed within one of the following
periods:
- Aprill-May3l,
- August I -September 10,
- November I -December 15 as a dormant seeding(seeding rates
shall be increased by 50% for dormant seedings).
Seeding Methods
Seeding should be performed by one of the following methods. Seed
should be planted to a depth of V4 to �i inches.
� Drill seedings,
- Broadcast and rolled, cultipacked or tracked with a small track piece
of construction equipment,
Hydroseeding,with subsequent tracking.
Mulch
Mulch the seedings with straw applied at the rate of�i tons per acre.
Anchor the mulch with erosion control netting or fabric on sloping
areas.
Warm Season Grasses
Warm Season Grasses begin growth slowly in the spring,grow rapidly
in the hot summer months and set seed in the fall. Many warm season
grasses are sensitive to frost in the fall,and the top growth may die
back. Growth begins from the plant base the following spring.
Lime and Fertilizer
Lime to attain a pH of at least 5.5.Apply a 0-10-10 analysis fertilizer at
the rate of 600 lbs./acre.
Incorporate both into the top 2-3 inches of soil. (30 lbs.of slow release
nitrogen should be applied after emergence of grass in the late spring.)
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
136 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Seeding Dates
Seeding operations should be performed as an early spring seeding(April
I-May 15)with the use of cold treated seed.A late fall early winter dormant
seeding(November I -December 15) can also be made, however the
seeding rate will need to be increased by 50%.
Seeding Methods
Seeding should be performed by one of the following methods:
Drill seedings (de-awned or de-bearded seed should be used unless the
drill is equipped with special features to accept awned seed).
� Broadcast seeding with subsequent rolling,cultipacking or tracking
the seeding with small track construction equipment.Tracking should be
oriented up and down the slope.
� Hydroseeding with subsequent tracking. If wood fiber mulch is used,
it should be applied as a separate operation after seeding and tracking to
assure good seed to soil contact.
Mulch
Mulch the seedings with straw applied at the rate of �i tons per acre.
Anchor the mulch with erosion control netting or fabric on sloping areas.
Seed Mixtures for Permanent Cover
Recommended mixtures for permanent seeding are provided on the
following pages.Select plant species which are suited to the site conditions
and planned use. Soil moisture conditions,often the major limiting site
factor, are usually classified as follows:
Dry-Sands and gravels to sandy loams. No effective moisture supply from
seepage or a high water table.
Moist-Well drained to moderately well drained sandy loams, loamis, and
finer;or coarser textured material with moderate influence on root zone
from seepage or a high water table.
Wet-All textures with a water table at or very near the soil surface,or with
enduring seepage.
When other factors strongly influence site conditions,the plants selected
must also be tolerant of these conditions.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 137
Permanent-Seeding Mixtures
Mix Site Seed Mixture Seed, Pounds per:
Acre 1,000 sf Remarks
-1, Dry Little Bluestem; Use Warm Season planting procedure.
or Broomsedge 10 O�25 * Roadsides
Tumble Lovegrass* 1 0.10 *Sand and Gravel Stabilization
Switchgrass 10 0.25 *Clover requires Inoculation with nitrogen-
fixing bacteria
Bush,Clover! 2 0:10
Red T6p: 1 0.10 Rates for this mix are for PLS.
�2_ Dry Deertongue 15 6.35 Use Warm Season'planting procedur I es.
Brpornse'.ge Acid sites/Mine spoil
d 0.25
Bush Clover* 2 �0.10 Clover requires inoculation with:nitrogen�
fixing bacteria.
Red Top , 1 0.10
*Rates-for this mix are for PE.S.
Dry Big Vbesterfi .0.25 *Use Warm Season planting procedures.
Indian Grass.. �,��10 0.25 -EasternPralrie appearance
Switchgra_ss, 10 0.25 *Sand and Gravel pits.
-25 *Golf Course Wild Areas
Little Bluestew .10 0.
Red Top or. I OAV,
Sanitaury Landfill Cover seeding
Perennial Ryegrass 10 0.25 Wildlife Areas.
*OK to substitute Poverty Dropseed in place,,
of.116d Tbp/Ryegr�ss.
*Rates for this mix are for PE.S.
�:.Dry Flat.Pea
�25 0.60 Use Cool Season planting procedures
press
Red Top or,, s, 2 0.16 Utility Right"f-Ways(tends.to'sup
Perennial ky.egrass 15 0:35. woody growth).
I BI 0 0
Dry-� Little uestem.* J, UseWarm Se�ason'planting procedures.
'Switchgrass.r '10 0.25 Coastal site's
-Beach Pea*: 20- .045 Rates:for Bluestein and Switchgrass.are for �c
-25 ,�
Perennial;Ryegrass 10 0.1 PIES.
'Pry�'_ Red Fescue 10 0.25 Use Cool Season planting procedure.
Moist',, Canada-Bluegrass'- 10 -0.25,, Provides,quick cover'but is non-aggressive;
Perennial,Ryegras�s, 10 0.25 %will tend to allow:indigenous,plant,
colonization.
Top 1 ,0.10 General erosion control on variety of sites,
including forest roads,skid trails and
landings.
�':7 Moist- Swltchgr�ss 10 �0.25 Use Warm Season planting procedure.
Wet Virginia Wild Rye. .5 0.10 Coastal plain/1116od plain
Big Bluestein 15 035
Rates,for Bluestein and Switchgrass are for
Red Top. I PLS,
PIZ
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
138 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Permanent See
ding Mixtures
Seed, Pounds per:
Mix Site Seed Mixture Acre 1,000 sf Remarks
8 Moist Creeping Bentgrass 5 0.10 *Use Cool Season planting procedures.
Wet Fringed Bromegrass 5 0.10 * Pond Banks
Fowl Meadowgrass 5 *Waterways/ditch banks
Ellmioint Reedgrass
of Rice Cutgrass 2 0.10
Perennial Ryegriss 10 O�25
9 Moist Red Fescu e� 5 0.10 *Salt Tolerant
Wet Cr6eping,Bentgrass 2 , 0.10 Fescue and Bentgrass provide low
growing appearance,While
Switcligrass provides fall cover for
wfldlife,
Switchgrass 0.20,
Perennial Ryegrass 10 &25
107 , Moist Reid Fescue 5 �� 0.10 Use Cool Season planting procedure.
Wet': Creeping Bentgrass- 5 0.10 Trefoil requires4noculation with nitrogen
fixink.bacteria..,
Virginia:Wild Rye 0.20 -
1,Wood Reed Grass'! 1 0.10 Suitable for forest access roads,skid
Showy Tick Trefoil* 1 0.10 trails anid'otherpartial shade,situations,
it,-, Moist CreepingBentgrass 5 A10 Use Cool Season planting.procedure..
W&t,: Bluejoint'Reed Grass 1, OA0 *,Suitable for waterways;pond 6r:ditch
banks.
Virginia Wild Rye. . Q.10 Trefoil requires inqc6lation With
nitrogen fbding bacteria.
10 0.25
Fowl Meadow Grass
0.10
Showy TldkTirefoil*
Red Top 1 0.10
12 Wat Blue Joint Reed,Grass 1 0.10 Use Cool Seas�on plan in' ure_
t g proced
KI, OK to seed insaturaied soil
'Canada..Manna Grass, 1 0.10.
conditions,but,n�t in standing
water.
Ride Cut Grass. I
0.10
CreeIng'Bent Grass- 5-, -0.10 �'.Sultable as stabilization seeding for
p
d
createdwetlan
'010 All species in this mix are native to
Fowl Meadow Gras's 5
Massachusetts.
13
Dry- �American,Beachgrass 18" 18, *Vegetative planting with dormant.
F-
culms,3-5culms.perplanting
Moist centers centers,
14 Inter- Smooth Cordgrass 12-18" 12-18" Vegetative planting with transplants.
Tidal saltmeacdow Cordgrass centers centers
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 139
Notes:
*Species such as Tumble Lovegrass,Fringed Brornegrass,Wood Reedgrass,Bush
Clover and Beach Pea,while known to be commercially available from specific seed
suppliers,may not always be available from your particular seed suppliers.The local
Natural Resources Conservation Service office may be able to help with a source of
supply.In the event a particular species listed in a mix can not be obtained,however,it
may be possible to substitute another species.
Seed mixtures by courtesy of Natural Resources Conservation Service,Amherst,MA.
(PLS) Pure Live Seed
Warm Season grass seed is sold and planted on the basis of pure live
seed.An adjustment is made to the bulk rate of the seed to compensate
for inert material and non-viable seed. Percent of pure live seed is
calculated by multiplying the percent purity by the percent germination;
C/o purity)x(%germination)=percent PLS.
For example, if the seeding rate calls for 10 lbs./acre PLS and the seed
lot has a purity of 70% and germination of 75%,the PLS factor is:
(.70 x.75) =.53
10 lbs.divided by.53 =approx. 19 lbs.
Therefore, 19 lbs of seed from the particular lot will need to be
applied to obtain 10 lbs.of pure live seed.
Special Note
Tall Fescue,Reed Canary Grass, Crownvetch and Birdsfoot Trefoil are no
longer recommended for general erosion control use in Massachusetts
due to the invasive characteristics of each.If these species are used,
it is recommended that the ecosystem of the site be analyzed for the
effects species invasiveness may impose.The mixes listed in the above
mixtures include either species native to Massachusetts or non-native
species that are not perceived to be invasive, as per the Massachusetts
Native Plant Advisory Committee.
Wetlands Seed Mixtures
For newly created wetlands, a wetlands specialist should design
plantings to provide the best chance of success. Do not use introduced,
invasive plants like reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) or purple
loosestrife(Lythrum salicaria). Using plants such as these will cause
many more problems than they will solve.
The following grasses all thrive in wetland situations:
cz Fresh Water Cordigrass(Spartina pectinata)
cz Marsh/Creeping Bentgrass(Agrostis stolonitera, var
Palusiric)
es Broomsedge(Andropogon virginicus)
eg Fringed ElTomegrass(Bromus ciliatus)
eg Blue Joint Reed Grass(Calamagrostis cavedensis)
es Fowl Meadow Grass(Glyceria striata)
(z Riverbank Wild Rye(Elymus riparius)
es Rice Cutgrass(Leersia oryzoides)
eg Stout Wood Reed (Cinna arundinacea)
ca Canada Manna Grass(Glyceria canadensis)
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
140 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
A sample wetlands seed mix developed by The New England
Environmental Wetland Plant Nursery is shown on the following page.
Wetland Seed Mixture
The New England Environmental Wetland Plant Nursery has
developed a seed mixture which is specifically designed to be used
in wetland replication projects and stormwater detention basins. It
is composed of seeds from a variety of indigenous wetland species.
Establishing a native wetland plant understory in these areas provides
quick erosion control,wildlife food and cover, and helps to reduce the
establishment of undesirable invasive species such as Phragmites and
purple loosestrife(Lythrum salicaria).The species have been selected
to represent varying degrees of drought tolerance, and will establish
themselves based upon microtopography and the resulting variation in
soil moisture.
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 141
�CommonName
(Scientific Name) Comments,
uridSedge 30 A low ground cover that tolerates mesic sites
lurida)
in-add,ition to saturated areas;prolific seeder
Wt
in second growin&'seas.on.
f�zfqwl Meadow Grasg 25' Tro' lific seed,producer that is a valuable,
V�"'(df' "iria Canaq 0 1 nsis) wildlifelfolod souirM"'
i.,'Tringedsedge A-mediurn to large sedge that tok�rates
ciinito
sa
ex tur4ed-areas' goidd seed'producer.,
E
oe-Pye Weed, --10 'r-'�-�Tlowering plant,thaV is,Valiiable for Wildlife
,,,(EypatoHade1phus.-m
P,,'titook Sedge, 6rateis a,widerange f-h d" I g
6 Y, 0 ic
�'.(e&&.Spp�, OVL716S
ondi i
gro ipions,
'n'
I rates fluctuating h`�d
o e
ro 99Y
us cyperiniii),
�,-'Flowering P,Ia,,rit.
tabnese
'(90,69toriudr-peif6liaturn)
cover. rows to, eet.
!,'�Fus's'ock Sed 5
ge,,,: k,Gko'ws in elevated hummocks on,wet sitesi ,,"I'll
'sit
-....y g.6w,rhizornonQuslyon,drier, es
ue.vervain -An t- pl�fit that beaA attractive�blue.., I
a ive 1
'(V�rbefid hastata)
owers�,
p i.c,
I ition
,'The iecomniiefid4i'
-'-P per 5 000 Square feet When used as' an,
,u:ndersiIoqrycoVei.,Thiis rate.sih6dId be,in4�iea�e,dlt6�oh6:�ound.,p'er..'�,!*squ'airefeet for'�'--'�
��,d��teiitionbiisiiisand,6th6tsiti!��Whi h'require a"very,clenso , -iji ate fall,
c �covei4ot'best-res Its'; al'
kecommend6&Thi:s mlik i d'f6r siimdiftg,wat I er:�'-
ri�Creeomrfiende,
IMP
Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines
Guidelines On Deicing Chemical(Road Salt) Storage I Water, Wastewater& Wetlands I MassDEP Page I of 2
MassDEP
Mazaachumms Depen ti, nt of Environmental Pmtenuon
Guidelines On Deicing Chemical (Road Salt)
Storage
Bureau of Resource Protection
Drinking Water Program
Effective Date:December 19, 1997,
Guideline No.DWSG97-1
Applicability:Applies to all parties storing road salt or other chemical deicing agents.
Supersedes:Fact Sheet.,DEICING CHENUCAL(ROAD SALT)STORAGE(January 1996)
Approved by:Arleen O'Donnell,Asst.Commissioner for Resouarce protection
PURPOSE:To summarize salt stomp prohibition standards around drinking water
supplies and current saft storage practices.
APPLICABILITY:These guidelines are issued on behalf of the Bureau of
Resource Protection's Drinking Water Program.They apply to all parties storing road salt or
other chemical deicing agents.
1. The Road Salt Problem:
Huaorically,there have been incidents in Massachusetts where improperly gored road salt
has polluted public and private drinking water supplies.Recognizing the problem,state and
local governments have taken steps in recent years to remedtate impacted water supplies and
to protect water supplies from firture:contamination.As a mutt of properly designing
stomp sheds,�incidents are uncommon.These guidelines summarize salt storage
prohibition standards around dnnkW water supplies and ciment salt sairage practices
11. Salt Pile Restrictions in Water Supply Protection
Areas:
Uncovered stomp of set is forbidden by Massachusetts General"w Chapter 85,section
7A in arm that would threaten water supplies.The Drinking Water Regulations,3 10 CMR
22.21(2)(b),also restrict deicing chemical storage within wellhead protection areas(Zone I
and Zone 11),for public water supply wclls�as follows:"storage of sodium chloride�
chemically treated abrasives or other chemicals used fir the removal of ice and snow on
roads fare prohibited],unless such storage is within a structure designed to prevent the
generation and escape of contaminated runaff or leachatc."For drinking water reservoiM
3 10 CMR 22.20C prohibits,through local bylaw,=covered or uncontained storage of mad
or parking lot de-icing and sanding materials within Zone A at new reservoirs and at those
reservoirs increasing their withdrawals under MGL Chapter 2 IG,the Water Management
Act.
For people on a low-sodiurn diet,20 mg/L of sodium in Oinking water is consistent with the
bottled water regulations'meaning of"sodium flee."At 20 mg/L,sodium contributes 100/9
or less to the sodium level in people on a sodium-restricted dicL For mom information
http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/laws/saitgui.htm 1/23/2012
Guidelines On Deicing Chemical.(Road Salt) Storage I Water, Wastewater& Wetlands MassDEP Page2.of2
0011tact:Catherine Sarafinas at 617-556-1070 or catherine.sarmfinas@statc.ma-us,or
Suzanne Robed at 617-292-5620 or suzanne.robert@state.ma.us.
Ill. Salt Storage Best Management Practices (BMP):
Components of an"enviroment-friendly"roadway deicing salt storage rwiiity include:
* the right site=a flat site;
0 adequate space for salt piles;
a storage on a pad(impervious/paved area);
0 storage under a roof;and
* mooff collection/containnuent.
For more information,we nc Salt Storage Handbook,6th cd.Virginia:Salt Institute,2006
(phone 703-549-4648 or http://�.saltinstitute.org/Publications-A-V/Salt-Storage-
Handbook).
IV. Salt Storage Practices of the Massachusetts
Highway Department:
The Massachusetts Highway Department(NM)has 216 permanent salt Storage sheds at
109 locations in the state.On leased land and state land under arteries and ramps,where the
MIJI)camaut build sheds,salt piles are stored under impermeable material.This acomunts
for an additional 15 sites.The MHD also administers a program to assist municipalities with
the construction of salt storage sheds.Of 351 commumities,201 municipalities have used
state funds for salt storage facilitie&
For mom nifiennation about NIND's salt storage facilities,contact Paul Brown at the
Massachusetts Highway Department,10 Park Plaza,Boston,MA 02116(phone 617-973-
7792).
http://www.mass.gov/dep/�ater/laws/saltgui.htm 1/23/2012
Snow Disposal Guidance I Water, Wastewater& Wetlands I MassDEP Page I of 4
MassDEP
Massachummi;DaPertment of Environmental Protatntan
Snow Disposal Guidance
Effective Date:Much 8,2001
Guideline No.BRPGOI-01 '
Applicability:Applies in all federal,state,regional and local agencies�as well as to private
businesses.
Supersedes:BRP Snow Disposal Guideline BRPG97-1 issued 12/19/97,and all preview
snow disposal guidance
Approved by:Glenn Haas,Assistant Commissioner for Resource Protection
PURPOSE:To provide guidelines to all government agencies and private businesses
regarding snow disposal site selection,site preparation and maintenance,and emergency
snow disposal options that are acceptable to the Department of Environmental Protection,
Bureau of Resin, Protection.
APPLICABILITY:Thew Guidelines are issued by the Bureau of Resource Protection on
behalf of all Bureau Programs(including Drinking Water Supply,Wetlands and Waterways,
Wastewater Management,and Watershed Planning and Permitting).They apply to public
agencies and private businesses disposing of snow in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
MRODUCTION
Finding a place to dispose of collected snow poses a challenge to municipalities and
businesses as they clear roads,puking lots,bridges,and sidewalks.While we are all aware
of the thican;to public sa&ty caused by snow,collected snow that is contaminated with mad
salt,sand,litter,and automotive pollutants such as oil also thivatens public health and the
environment
As mow melts,mad salt,sand,litter,and other pollutants are transported into surface water
or through the wil where they may evexrhiM[y reach the gmundwater.Road salt and other
pollutants can contaminate water supplies an4kam toxic to aquiali life at certain levels.Sand
washed into wmcrbocli�can mate amid bans or fill in wetlands and ponds�impacting
aquatic life,causing flooding,and affecting our use of these resources.
11tere are severaYsteps that communities:can take to in*�— '-the impacts of snow disposal
on public health and the environment These steps will help communities avoid the costs of
a contaminated water supply,degraded waterbodies,and floocling.Everything we do onthe
land has the potential to impact our water resourec&Oivert the authority oflocall
government over the use of the land,municipal officials and staff have a critippily
Mkittiplay in prompting our water resources. portant
lb&"w of thesic guldelims�is torliellimumicipalitim and busimosses.sclecti preparcand
maintain ap'Prolarifte snow disposaI'siL�s before th�inow begins in am' unitibno th,rough the
http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/laws/sno%�disp.htin 1/23/2012
Snow Disposal Guidance I Water, Wastewater& Wetlands MassDEP Page 2 of 4
winter.
RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES
These mow disposal guidelines address:(1)site selection;(2)site preparation and
maintenaroce;and(3)emergency snow disposal.
1.SrrE SELECTION
The key to selecting effective snow disposal sites is to locate them adjacent to or on
pervious surfaces in upland areas away from water resources and well&At these locations,
the snow meltwater can filter in to the soil,leaving behind sand and debris which can be
removed in die springtime.The fidlowing imars should be avoided:
a Avoid damping of snow into any waterbody,including rivers,the ocean,reservoirs,
ponds,or wetlands.hi addition to water quality impacts and flooding,snow disposed
of in open water can.cause navigational hazards when it ficezes into ice blocks.
o Do not dump snow within a Zone H or Interim Wellhead Protection Area(lWPA)of
a public water supply well or within 75 feet of a private well,where road salt my
contammate,water supplies. I
9 Avoid dumping snow on MassDEP-designaed high and medium-yield aquifers
where it may contaminate groundwater(sm the next page fir information on
ordering maps from MassGIS showing the locations of aquifas,Zone ll's�and
IWPAs in your community).
* Avoid dumping snow in sanitary landfills and gravel pits.Snow meltwater will
create more contaminated leachate in landfills posing a greater risk to groundwater,
and in gravel pits,there is little opportunity for poHutants to be filtered out of the
meltwater because groundwater is close to the land surface.
* Avoid disposing of snow on top of storin drain catch basins or in stormwater
drainage swales or ditches.Snow combined with sand and debris my block a storm
drainage system causing localized flooding.A high volume of sand,sediment,raw
litter released from melting snow also may be quickly transported through the
system into surface,water.
Site Selection Procedures
a. It is important that the municipal Department of Public Works or Highway
Department,Conservation Commission,and Board ofHealth work together to select
appropriate snow disposal sites.The following steps should be taken:
b. Estimate bow much mow disposal capacity is needed for the season so that an
adequate number ofilisposal sites can be selected and prepared.
c. Identify sites dim could potentially be used for snow disposal such as municipal
open space(e.g.,parking lots or parks).
d. Sites located in upland locations that are out likely to impact sensitive environmental
resources should be selected firsu.
c. lfmorc storage space is still nee"prioritize the sites with die leasti environmental
impact(wing the site selection criteria,and local or MassGlS maps as a guide).
MassGIS Maps ofOpen Space and Water Resources
Iflocal maps do not show the information you need to select appropriate snow disposal
sites,you may order maps from MassGIS(Massachusetts Geographic Information System)
which show publicly owned open spaces and approximate locations ofsensitive
environmental resources(locations should be field-verified where possible).Diffiettint
http://www.mass.gov/dep/W�ater/laws/snowdisp.htin 1/23/2012
Snow Disposal Guidance I Water, Wastewater& Wetlands I MassDEP Page 3 of
coverages or map themes depicting sensitive environmental resources me available from
MsssGIS on the map you order.At a minimum,you should order the Priority Resources
Map.The Priority Resources Map includes aquifers,public water supplies,MassDEP-
approved Zone 11's,Interim Wellhead Protection Areas,Wctlands�Open Space,Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern,NRESP Wetlands Habitat%MassDEP Permitted Solid
Waste fitcilitics,Surface Water Protection areas(Zone A's)and base map features.The cost
of this map is$25.00.Other coverages or map thenises you my consider,depending on the
location of your city or town,include Outstanding Resource Waters and MassDEP Eelgrass
Resources.Thew are available at$25.00 cook with each map theme being depicted on a
separate map.Maps should be ordered from MassGIS via the Internet at
http://%%�.ma s.gov/ingis.Maps my also be ordered by fax at(617)626-1249(order form
available from the MmGIS web site)or mail.For father information,contact MassGIS at
(617)626-1189.
2.SITE PREPARATION AND MAINTENANCE
in addition to carefully selecting disposal sites before the winter begins,it is important to
prepare and maintain these sites to maximize their effiectiveness.The following maintenance
measures should be undertaken for all snow disposal sites:
* A silt fence or equivalent barrier should be placed securely on the downgradient side
of the snow disposal site.
* To filter pollutants out of the meltwater,a 50-foot vegetative buffer strip should be
maintained during the growth season between die disposal site and adjacent
waterbodies.
9 Debris should be cleared from the site print to using the site for mow disposal.
e Debris should be cleared from the site and properly disposed of at the end of the
mow season and an later than May 15.
3.EMERGENCY SNOW DISPOSAL
As mentioned earlier,it is important to estimate the mount of snow disposal capacity you
will need so that an adequate number of upland disposal sites can be selected and prepared.
If despite you planning,upland disposal sites have been exhausted,snow may be disposed
of near waterbodics.A vegetated buffer of at least 50 feet should still be maintained between
the site and the waterbody in these situatimus.Furthermore,it is essential that the other
guidelines for preparing and maintaining mow disposal sites be flillowed to minimize the
threat to adjacent waterbodies.
Under extraordinary conditions,when all land-based snow disposal options am exhausted,
disposal of snow thair is not obviously contaminated with road ask amid,and other
pollutants may be allowed in certain waterbodies under certain conditions.In these dire
situations,notify you Conservation Commission and the appropriate MassDEP Regional
Service Cent"before disposing of snow in a waterbody.
Use the following guidelines in these emergency situations:
& Dispose of mow in open water with adequate flow and mixing to prevent ice darns
from funning.
* Do not dispose of snow in saltmarshes,vegetated wetlands,certified venal pools,
shellfish beds,naulflat%drinking water reservoirs and their tributaries,Zone Ils or
IWPAs of public waiter supply welis,Outstanding Resource Waters,or Areas;of
Critical Environmental Concern.
hup://www.mass.gov/dep/water/laws/snowdisp.htni 1/23/2012
Snow Disposal Guidance I Water, Wastewater&Wetlands I MassDEP Page 4 of 4
• Do not dispose of snow where bucks my cause shoreline damage or emsion.
• Consult with the municipal Conservation Commission to ensum that snow disposal
in open water complies with local ordinances and bylaws.
FOR moRE ilslFoRmAmN
If you need mom information,contact one of MassDEPs Regional service Centers:
Northeast Regional Office,Wilmington,978-694-3200
southeast Regional Office,I.Akeville,508-946-2714
Central Regional Office,Worcester,508-792-7683
Western Regional Office,Springfiel(l,413-755-2214
or
Call Thomas Maguire of DEP's Bureau of Resource Protection in Boston at 617-292-5602.
http://www.mass.gov/dep/Water/laws/snowdisp.htm 1/23/2012