Loading...
331-335 LAFAYETTE ST, 5-7,11 WEST AVE - PLANNING i S 5 we&4 twe rr - SJRPlan Spl2 De�iSr�n ; 33) -335 ..�a�'� \ 5-�- + r r west , CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD loib MAY 2b P 3: 02 � r CITY Site Plan Review Decision 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & I I West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231; 232, 233 and 234) May 26, 2016 331 Lafayette, LLC 75 Nanepashment Street j Marblehead, MA 01945 RE: Site Plan Review-331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7& I I West Avenue On Thursday, March 17, 2016, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing regarding the application of 331 Lafayette, LLC for a Special Permit pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, Site Plan Review, for nonresidential construction over 10,000 square feet located at 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue and 11 West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234). The project includes the construction of a three-story 24,388 square foot mixed use commercial building with retail on the first floor and offices on the upper floors. An existing two-family home on the site will remain in its current use. The Public Hearing was closed on May 19, 2016. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on May 19, 2016, the Board voted by a vote of nine (9) in favor (Ben Anderson, Matt Veno, Helen Sides, Kirt Rieder, Tony Mataragas, Noah Koretz, Carole Hamilton, Dale Yale, Bill Griset) in favor and none (0) opposed, to approve the application as complying, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan a. Work shall conform with sheets C1-C4, DI-D3, L-1 and SL-I of plans entitled, "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building"prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc., dated May 4, 2016; sheets Al-A7 of plans entitled, "331 Lafayette Street, Salem, MA" prepared by Pitman & Wardley Architects, LLC, dated May 5, 2016 the Elevation Plan prepared by Pitman & Wardley Architects, LLC, dated May 12, 2016; and the Materials and Colors Plan prepared by James K. Emmanuel Associates dated May 10, 2016. 1 2. Transfer of Ownership a. In the event of the transfer of the site as a whole, within five (5) days of such transfer, the Owner shall notify the Board in writing of the new owner's name and address. The terms, conditions, restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the Owner and its successors and/or assigns. 3. Amendments a. Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. b. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 4. Construction Practices a. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: b. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22, Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. c. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. d. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. e. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. f. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. g. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site must be located completely on the site. 5. Office of the City Engineer a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit the required documentation to the City Council for the easement depicted on the project plans for the proposed turning lane on West Avenue. c. A final erosion and sediment control plan with the construction scheduling, construction phasing, location of material stock piles, -equipment storage and 2 refueling areas shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to building permit issuance. a. The applicant shall provide an engineered plan to the City Engineer that verifies the final service size and locations of the sewer service and grease trap prior to the issuance of building permits. The size and type of grease trap shall meet all current state and local regulations, and be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of building permits b. The design of utility crossings shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. c. The calculation of sewer invert elevations shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. d. The project MEP engineer shall conduct a hydrant flow test, and submit the results to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Fire Department a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. b. The building shall be equipped with a full automatic fire sprinkler system, if required by Massachusetts fire safety code. 7. Building Commissioner a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Commissioner. 8. Utilities a. Plan for utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 9. Department of Public Services a. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Department of Public Services. 10. Board of Health and Health Department a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Board of Health and Health Department. b. Adequate trash storage must be provided based on the number of units and collection frequency. 11. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. "Refuse removal' includes recycling, which shall be the responsibility 3 of the owner, his successors or assigns. The owner shall provide adequate facilities to ensure all users are able to recycle their trash. Owner is to enter into a contract with a company of the owner's choice to arrange pick-up of recyclable material. A copy of this contract is to be submitted to the City Engineer. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off- site. 12. Lighting a. Light trespass onto adjacent parcels/rights of way shall be avoided as indicated on the photometric plan. b. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed by the City Planner, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Maintenance of all landscaping on the site shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. The Applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two (2) year period, from issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and completion of planting. c. Final completed landscaping, done in accordance with the approved set of plans, shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior, for consistency with such plans, to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. d. Planter retaining wall capstone as illustrated in landscape details shall be a three (3) inch thick monolithic granite slab. 14. Clerk of the Works a. A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the expense of the applicant, his successors or assigns, as it deemed necessary by the City Planner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to controlled construction, which requires oversight by licensed engineered and architects. Accordingly it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site improvements related to the project located within the public way, including all utility connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the expense associated with the Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of hours and at a customary rate of service. b. The applicant shall submit a construction plan to the City Planner each season, prior to starting work. c. The construction plan will be incorporated into the Clerk of the Works Task Order. No work shall start prior to an approved task order for these services. 4 15.As-built Plans a. As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Engineering Department prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. 16. Violations a. Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. I Ben J. Anderson Chair 5 SPR OeCCS Cf) 331-335 LteOe NOD 5-� + 11 ve _ 4 \ 1 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 201b MAY 2b P 3: 02 CITY Site Plan Review Decision 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & 11 West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234) May 26, 2016 331 Lafayette, LLC 75 Nanepashment Street Marblehead, MA 01945 RE: Site Plan Review-331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7& 11 West Avenue On Thursday, March 17, 2016, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing regarding the application of 331 Lafayette, LLC for a Special Permit pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, Site Plan Review, for nonresidential construction over 10,000 square feet located at 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue and 11 West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234). The project includes the construction of a three-story 24,388 square foot mixed use commercial building with retail on the first floor and offices on the upper floors. An existing two-family home on the site will remain in its current use. The Public Hearing was closed on May 19, 2016. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on May 19, 2016, the Board voted by a vote of nine (9) in favor (Ben Anderson, Matt Veno, Helen Sides, Kir[ Rieder, Tony Mataragas, Noah Koretz, Carole Hamilton, Dale Yale, Bill Griset) in favor and none (0) opposed, to approve the application as complying, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan a. Work shall conform with sheets C1-C4, 131-133, L-1 and SL-1 of plans entitled, "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building"prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc., dated May 4, 2016; sheets Al-A7 of plans entitled, "331 Lafayette Street, Salem, MA" prepared by Pitman & Wardley Architects, LLC, dated May 5, 2016 the Elevation Plan prepared by Pitman & Wardley Architects, LLC, dated May 12, 2016; and the Materials and Colors Plan prepared by James K. Emmanuel Associates dated May 10, 2016. I 2. Transfer of Ownership a. In the event of the transfer of the site as a whole, within five (5) days of such transfer, the Owner shall notify the Board in writing of the new owner's name and address. The terms, conditions, restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the Owner and its successors and/or assigns. 3. Amendments a. Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. b. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 4. Construction Practices a. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: b. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22, Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. c. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. d. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. e. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. f. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. g. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site must be located completely on the site. 5. Office of the City Engineer a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit the required documentation to the City Council for the easement depicted on the project plans for the proposed turning lane on West Avenue. c. A final erosion and sediment control plan with the construction scheduling, construction phasing, location of material stock piles, equipment storage and 2 refueling areas shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to building permit issuance. a. The applicant shall provide an engineered plan to the City Engineer that verifies the final service size and locations of the sewer service and grease trap prior to the issuance of building permits. The size and type of grease trap shall meet all current state and local regulations, and be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of buildingpermits b. The design of utility crossings shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. c. The calculation of sewer invert elevations shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. d. The project MEP engineer shall conduct a hydrant flow test, and submit the results to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Fire Department a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. b. The building shall be equipped with a full automatic fire sprinkler system, if required by Massachusetts fire safety code. 7. Building Commissioner a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Commissioner. 8. Utilities a. Plan for utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 9. Department of Public Services a. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Department of Public Services. 10. Board of Health and Health Department a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Board of Health and Health Department. b. Adequate trash storage must be provided based on the number of units and collection frequency. 11. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. "Refuse removal' includes recycling, which shall be the responsibility 3 of the owner, his successors or assigns. The owner shall provide adequate facilities to ensure all users are able to recycle their trash. Owner is to enter into a contract with a company of the owner's choice to arrange pick-up of recyclable material. A copy of this contract is to be submitted to the City Engineer. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off- site. 12. Lighting a. Light trespass onto adjacent parcels/rights of way shall be avoided as indicated on the photometric plan. b. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed by the City Planner, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Maintenance of all landscaping on the site shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. The Applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two (2) year period, from issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and completion of planting. c. Final completed landscaping, done in accordance with the approved set of plans, shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior, for consistency with such plans, to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. d. Planter retaining wall capstone as illustrated in landscape details shall be a three (3) inch thick monolithic granite slab. 14. Clerk of the Works a. A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the expense of the applicant, his successors or assigns, as it deemed necessary by the City Planner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to controlled construction, which requires oversight by licensed engineered and architects. Accordingly it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site improvements related to the project located within the public way, including all utility connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the expense associated with the Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of hours and at a customary rate of service. b. The applicant shall submit a construction plan to the City Planner each season, prior to starting work. c. The construction plan will be incorporated into the Clerk of the Works Task Order. No work shall start prior to an approved task order for these services. 4 15.As-built Plans a. As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Engineering Department prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. 16.Violations a. Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Ben I Anderson Chair 5 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Notice of Decision At a meeting of City of Salem Planning Board held on Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 7:00pm at 120 Washington St., Salem, MA,the Planning Board voted on the following items: A public hearing to consider the application of 331 LAFAYETTE, LLC for a Site Plan Review in accordance with Salem Zoning Ordinance Section 9.5 for the property located at 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue and ll West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234). Specifically, the application proposes nonresidential construction over 10,000 square feet. The project includes the construction of a three-story 24,388 square foot mixed use commercial building with retail on the first floor and offices on the upper floors. An existing two-family home on the site will remain in its current use. Decision: Approved with Conditions Filed with the City Clerk on May 26, 2016 This notice is being sent in compliance with the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40_A, Sections 9 & 15 and doer not require action by the recipient Appeals, if any,shall be made pursuant to Chapter 40A, Section 17, and shall be frled mithin 20 days from the date which the decision was filed will)the City Clerk. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 • WWW.SALEM.COM SpR � �;cGfio� Penns + gees 331 -a3s l.a�'a eF{e The Morin-Cameron © ROUR ON May 5, 2016 Salem Planning Board c/o Ms. Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner Department of Planning &Community Development Salem City Halt Annex 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: Response to Peer Review Comments 331 Lafayette Street Redevelopment Salem, Massachusetts Dear Ms. Chiancola and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of 331 Lafayette Street, LLC (Applicant), The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. (MCG) has provided the following responses to comments issued by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc (SCS) on May 3, 2016. The SCS comments are italicized and listed below followed by the MCG responses. Included with this submission is the following: - Plan set entitled "Site Plan of Land in Salem, Massachusetets 331-335 Lafayette Street & 5, 7 & 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 &234) Prepared for 331 Lafayette, LLC" prepared by MCG on February 25, 2016 and revised through April 5, 2016. - Supplemental stormwater management information prepared by MCG We offer the following in response to the SCS comments: Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements (Cloutier) 1. SCS Comment: The proposed design consists of one-way circulation with 90-degree parking. Angle parking is typically used when one-way circulation is proposed to encourage the one-way circulation. if 90-degree parking is allowed, it is very likely that some drivers leaving the parking spats will drive the wrong way. Consider modifying the parking stalls to angled parking. This may result in fewer parking spaces. MCG Response:The parking lot design considered many factors in addition to complying with the zoning ordinance dimensional requirements for parking, as it does now. The use of the property witl be primarily for office with an accessory retail component. The retail, for all intents, is primarily intended to cater to walk up business as is customary at the existing site. The office use will be regular drivers who will have familiarity with the parking area with regular use. This familiarity factor was a part of the design process for the parking area as it is shown on the plans. The Applicant, who will be responsible for the parking conditions as a private land owner, was comfortable with this design and it does not present any limitations with respect to emergency vehicle access. Notwithstanding the above, the plans have been revised to include a slight angle to the main entrance aisle parking spaces entering from Lafayette Street. This will ensure that drivers will follow the correct route to the West CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LAND USE PLANNERS 447 Boston Street (U.S. Route 1) Topsfield, MA 01983 978.887.8586 FAX 978.887.3480 Providing Professional Services Since 1978 www.morincameron.com Salem Planning Board May 5,2016 2 Avenue exit. The other parking spaces on the eastern portion of the site, a driver who accidentally turns in the wrong direction can turnaround in the parking area. Signage and pavement markings will provide adequate directional instruction for drivers. 2. SCS Comment., The proposed driveway aisles are 20 feet, 21.5 feet and 22 feet wide. Typically, 24- foot-wide aisles are needed for 90-degree parking. Widths narrower than this are difficult from drivers to turn into parking spaces. Narrower widths can be used if angled parking is proposed MCG Response: In addition to angling the spaces on the main entrance aisle which addresses the 20- foot width concern in that aisle, the design generally complies with aisle industry parking design standards. Most parking codes and engineering practice require an 18' space, 24' aisle and an 18' space for a total width, curb to curb, of 60'. In Salem, the ordinance requires a 19' space with the option to include a 2' overhanging. Aisles can be reduced to as tow as 20'. In this application, the eastern portion of the site has aisles varying in width from 21.5', 21.7' and 22'. Parking spaces will be 19' deep on each side, some with the overhang. This meets, or nearly meets, the industry standard of 60' curb to curb and more importantly meets the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, itis the position of MCG that the aisles satisfactorily meet industry standards and the Salem Zoning Ordinance for parking lot design. 3. SCS Comment. Typical parking space depth is 18 feet. The proposed plan includes 19-foot-deep parking spaces near walkways and 17 feet where the vehicle can overhang landscaped area. This is Sufficient for most of the site, but can create conflicts at two locations. Near the proposed transformer pad on the eastern side of the site, vehicles in the two short spaces on each side of the transformer can block each other if the driver doesn't pull up far enough. This can be rectified by moving the four spaces westerly by a couple feet. Similarly, the parking spaces in the northeast corner present a conflict if drivers don't pull up far enough. This can be rectified by moving the two spaces westerly by a couple feet MCG Response:The parking aisle has been shifted 2' along the east side line row of parking, away from the 2 isolated spaces to the east of the transformer. The adjacent row of 4 parking spaces to the south was shifted 2' to the west. In addition, "small car' parking signs will be added to the end 2 parking spaces to deter larger vehicles from parking in those locations. This changes wit[ensure vehicles parking on the corners are not obstructed. 4. SCS Comment The parking space immediately adjacent to the entrance is located very close to the property entrance. When a driver backs out of this spot, they will block the entrance and likely back over the sidewalk. Consider eliminating this spot. MCG Response: The parking space adjacent to the entrance on Lafayette was angled to allow a shallower backing movement to exit the space. In addition, a "small car' parking sign will be posted to deter larger vehicles from parking in that location. S. SCS Comment.• The concrete cement sidewalk should extend across the driveways. MCG Response: Concrete driveway aprons were identified on the site Layout plan. The driveway detail was revised to illustrate a concrete apron. 6. SCS Comment- Deliveries areas are not shown. What types of delivery vehicles are expected? Can they fit in a standard parking space? Y Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 3 MCG Response: Deliveries to the site are not anticipated to require large trailer trucks. The majority of deliveries are anticipated to fit within the normal parking spots. Routine deliveries by small, box trucks will be anticipated for the accessory retail use which encompasses a small portion of this project. Deliveries will primarily occur during off-peak business hours so the parking lot will be available to temporarily use parking spaces for offloading. This will be coordinated between the owner and potential lessees of the property. Other Comments SCS Comment:Proposed 'Stop"/'Do Not Enter'Signs are located close to the West Avenue sidewalk. MCG Response: The stop line and sign were shifted away from the sidewalk. SCS Comment On sheet D-3, increase height of the Sign Post Detail to 7 feet of clearance from the ground to bottom of the sign. MCG Response: The sign post detail was adjusted to 7'. SGS Comment.• The landscaping plan show a planter and a tree on the southwestern corner of the property in the vicinity of the future traffic signal mast arm. Please relocate/remove. MCG Response:The tree was removed from the corner near the signal mast arm. Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements (Rayno) 1. SCSComment: The proposed permanent sidewalk easement shouldprovideaminimum of3'clear around the pedestrian signal and push button mount at the corner of West Avenue and Lafayette Street to ensure a compliant path of travel within the City Right of Way. MCG Response:The sidewalk easement was adjusted to accommodate 3' around the mast arm base. 2. SCS Comment: Consider identifying existing trees to be removed on either the Existing Conditions Plan or Site Layout Plan, such as the existing tree located just behind the existing fence between 327 and 331 Lafayette Street MCG Response: A note was added to the site plan that "All existing trees within the subject premises will be removed except as specifically noted hereon." 3. SCS Comment: Proposed driveways on Site Plan should be shown as cement concrete driveways consistent with the detail on D-2 Construction Details A MCG Response: Concrete driveway aprons were identified on the site layout plan. The driveway detail was revised to illustrate a concrete apron. 4. SCS Comment: Provide a detail for concrete curb as labelled as 'CC"on the Site Layout Plan. Clarify differences between 'CC"and 'PCC"(precast concrete curb. MCG Response: All curb will be precast concrete. The notes were adjusted on the Site Layout Plan. 5. SCS Comment: The proposed 9'wide parking stall width does not provide adequate space for a driver/passenger to exit the vehicle adjacent to the dumpster pad and fence enclosure. MCG Response: This parking space complies with the geometric requirements of the zoning ordinance. Frequent users of the parking lot for the office space will be accustomed to parking there so the adjacent dumpster will "self-regulate' or deter larger vehicles from parking there. } Salem Planning Board May 5,2016 4 6. SCS Comment: Per the 521 CMR:Architectural Access Board section 32.2.1 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a parking lot with 69 total spaces would require 3 accessible spaces with one being van accessible. MCG Response: A 31d handicap space was added in front of the building with a 5' loading space and handicap ramp. The landscape island on West Avenue was reduced to the Zoning Ordinance minimum of 5' to accommodate this change. 7. SCS Comment: Replace the word "staked"with "stacked"in the curbing notes MCG Response:This scriveners error was corrected. 8. SCS Comment: Provide a proposed gutter grade opposite the existing roadway grade of"32.42"on West Avenue to ensure positive drainage on West Avenue. MCG Response: The spot grade was added to the Grading and Utility Plan. 9. SCS Comment: Proposed sidewalk grade '3260"at the intersection of the WestAvenue sidewalk and eastern walkway adjacent to the building would cause the sidewalk to slope back toward the building if a 6"reveal is used at the gutter. Consider revising the elevation to '3270"to ensure positive drainage to the gutter. MCG Response: The grades at the south east corner of the building were adjusted accordingly. 10. SCS Comment: Per the 521 CMR:Architectural Access Board section 32.21 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a wheelchair ramp curb cut shall have a level landing with a 4'length. Revise curb ramp details on D-2 Construction Details 11 accordingly. MCG Response:The curb cut details were revised to illustrate 4' landing areas. 11. SCS Comment: Replace ??'with "114"on lip label in the Accessible Curb Ramp(ACR) Type 9'detail on D-2 Construction Details 0. MCG Response:This scriveners error was corrected. 12. SCS Comment: Consider using a plastic sleeve to form the rounded cap in the bollard detail rather than formed concrete. Formed concrete have undesirable results during and after curing. MCG Response: The bollard detail was revised to include a rounded plastic cap. 13. SCS Comment: Locate and label the locations where bollard mounted signs are installed on the Site Layout Plan. Consider revising 5'min dimension to something higher as signs mounted that low may be hit by larger vehicles. MCG Response:There are no longer any bollard signs on the plans. The detail was removed. Task 34.2 - Drainage (Broyles) MassDEP Stormwater Standards The initial submittal did not include a stormwater management summary since the project is not subject to the Wetlands Protection Act and the MassDEP Stormwater Management Standards are not referenced in the Zoning Ordinance. Nonetheless, we concur with SCS that adherence to the standards, to the extent practicable, is good engineering practice and a commonly used guide for development projects regardless of legal applicability. The following is a summary of these standards for the administrative record. Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 5 A. SCS Comment: Standard No. 1 requires no untreated stormwater discharges or erosion to wetland resource areas. MCG has not pro vided and documentation or statement regarding this standard We recommend the MCG provide this information to the Department for review, MCG Response: The project will not discharge to a wetland or cause erosion to a wetland. The discharge will be to the municipal storm sewer. Roof runoff from the 9,100 square foot footprint building will be directed to a subsurface infiltrating drywell. The remaining parking and landscape areas will result in a reduction in tributary pavement surface area draining directly to the municipal storm sewer. As a result of this reduction, peak flows will be reduced from the property. A basic HydroCAD watershed analysis is provided herewith confirming that runoff from the site towards West Avenue and Lafayette Street will be reduced in the 2, 10 and 100-year storm events. Storm Existing Runoff(CFS) Proposed Runoff (CFS) Lafayette Street 2-yr 2.41 1.97 10-yr 3.71 3.37 100-yr 5.54 5.54 West Avenue 2-yr 0.17 0.08 10-yr 0.26 0.14 100-yr 0.39 0.23 The project complies with this standard. B. SCS Comment Standard No. 2 requires peak flow attenuation(i.e. no increase in peak stormwater discharge rates)MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this standard. We recommend the MCG provide this information to the Department for review. MCG Response: See response 1 above. The project complies with this standard. C. SCS Comment. Standard No. 3 requires the loss of annual recharge to groundwater be minimized through the use of infiltration measures and annual recharge from post-development shall approximate the annual recharge from pre-development conditions. The 5tormwater Management Summary documents the provided recharge volume by the Subsurface Recharge System exceeds the required recharge volume. However we recommend the documentation be provided to verify the Subsurface Recharge System will drain within 72 hours MCG Response:The recharge system will drain within 72 hours: Drawdown calculation: Static Method Draw Down Time = 916 CF/ (1.02 in/hr/(1ft./12in.) * 580 SF stone base) = 18.6 hours The project complies with this standard. D. SCS Comment.•Standard No. 4 requires the stormwater management system include a series of Best Management Practices(BMPs) to demonstrate a total suspended solids(TSS)removal rate of least 80 percent. The MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this requirement. Further we recommend the required water quality volume be addressed by the applicant Salem Planning Board May 5,2016 6 Standard 4 requires the development and implementation of suitable practices for source control and pollution prevention. These measures must be identified in a long-term pollution prevention plan (LTPPP). The LTPPP may be prepared as a separate document or combined with the Operations and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9. The applicant has submitted the LTPPP under a separate cover and reviewed as a part of this Standard We recommend the applicant discuss storing materials and waste products inside or under cover and the spill prevention/response. MCG Response: As stated in the initial submittal and corroborated by SCS later in this report, the project is a redevelopment project. As such, it is required to comply with the standards to the maximum extent practicable. The stormwater management system will be constructed using deep- sump and hooded outlet pipes configured in an offline manner. The catch basins will achieve 25%TSS removal efficiency from the site. It will also eliminate runoff which presently sheet flows directly to the street surface. In the existing condition, there is no TSS removal of runoff and therefore the redevelopment will result in an improvement over existing conditions with regard to treatment of runoff and removing surface runoff from the roadway. The LTPPP discusses provisions for storing chemicals inside. This meets the redevelopment standard 7 outlined below. The spill prevention plan was revised accordingly. The project complies with this standard to the maximum extent practicable. E. SCS Comment.•Standard No. 5 requires the use of specific stormwater management BMPs from Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollution Loads(LUHPPLs). It is Stantecs opinion the project is not in an area of LUHPPL. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department MCG Response: The project is not a Land Use with a Higher Potential Pollutant Load and is not subject to this standard. The project complies with this standard. F. SCS Comment Standard No. 6 Critical Areas. It is Stantec's opinion the project is not in a critical area. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. MCG Response:The project does not discharge to a critical area. The project complies with this standard. G. SCS Comment: Standard No. 7 Redevelopment Project, It is Stantec's opinion that the Site Plan qualifies as a redevelopment project. We recommend the application provide a statement to the Department. MCG Response: As noted above, the project will result in a significant improvement to the stormwater conditions of the site as a result of redevelopment. With the exception of Standard 4 above, the project will fully comply with the Stormwater Management Standards discussed herein. Water quality will be provided to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating catch basins with deep sumps and hooded outlets. The project complies with this standard. H. SCS Comment. Standard No. 8 requires and erosion and sedimentation control plan be developed and implemented to provide impacts during construction and land disturbance activities. The submitted Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan include a discussion of erosion and sedimentation controls during Construction. We recommend the Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 7 aforementioned erosion controls be identified on drawing C-4. Further we recommend a schedule for construction and stormwater management activities be provided on the site plans. We recommend the submitted erosion control plans include construction phasing, location of material stockpiles, equipment storage, and refueling areas. MCG Response: The silt fence and silt sacks have been added to Sheet C-4 of the plans. A general construction sequence is included on the plans as well. However, the final construction schedule, sequence and management plan for the stormwater related activities cannot be finalized until the General Contractor is selected for the project. The GC will prepare this plan as part of the project construction documents package. As discussed previously, itis not customary to have this information finalized during the permitting phase of the project and is more customarily part of the CD package. If requested by the Board, the applicant can provide this information to the planning department along with the final CD's for the project. The project complies with this standard by providing the erosion control plan for construction. Additional information can be provided to the planning department with the final CD's for the project. I. SCS Comment Standard No. 9 requires all stormwater management systems have a long-term operation and maintenance plan to ensure the systems function as designed The submitted Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan includes information regarding the Owner of the Stormwater Management System. The submitted LTPPP, as discussed under Standard 4, includes information about the maintenance tasks, mentions the party or parties responsible for the O&M of the BMP during construction. We recommend the applicant identify the party or parties responsible for operation and maintenance of the Stormwater system after construction. MCG Response: The applicant, or future land owner, will be responsible for maintenance of the stormwater system as noted in the LTPPP. The project complies with this standard. J. SCS Comment.• Standard No. 10 Prohibition of Illicit Discharges. We note that as part of the Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan, MCG has pro information relative to prevention of illicit P discharges. We recommend the applicant provide a signed Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement verifying that no illicit discharges exist on the site. The project complies with this standard. General Comments 1. SCS Comment: The flow direction of the 12" VC Drain on West Avenue appears to be incorrect based in surveyed inverts. MCG Response: The flow direction was illustrated correctly. The pipe invert and rim was corrected. 2. SCS Comment: The slope and flow direction should be identified on all proposed drainage pipes on the Grading, Drainage&Utility Plan, Drawing No. C-4. MCG Response: The slopes and flow directions for all proposed pipes were added to the plans. 3. SCS Comment: The Outlet Control Structure(OCS-1), as shown on Drawing No. C-4 identifies the Invert B as 24.30, however the detail on Drawing No. D-3, identifies it as 24.38. Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 B MCG Response: The invert was corrected on the detail to 24.30. 4. SCS Comment: The baffle elevation identified within the 005-1, as shown on Drawing No. D-3 will interfere with the precast flat top as shown. MCG Response: The baffle elevation was corrected to elevation 29.40. S. SCS Comment: The OCS detail identifies a 4"orifice, however, the section identifies a baffle. MCG Response: The detail was corrected to illustrate a baffle. 6. SCS Comment: The Precast Typical Catch Basin should identify the hood as shown on the detail. MCG Response:The hooded outlet note was moved to point to the graphic illustration of the hood. 7. SCS Comment: As noted in the Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan, deep sump catch basins, with a four(4) foot sump, are being proposed. The detail on Drawing No. D-3 identifies the sump as three(3) feet MassDEP requires deep sump catch basin to have a four(4)sump. MCG Response: The sumps were adjusted to 48" (4'). 8. SCS Comment: The Utility Trench Detail on Drawing No. D-3 is for all utilities except Drainage utilities. The detail should be clarified, ora new detail created, to incorporate installation of drainage pipe. MCG Response: The utility trench detail was updated to reflect gravitypipe construction parameters with a note to change the bedding to sand for any water or fire suppression pipes. Task 34.3 - Sewer (KucharskVSilva) Generally, several of the comments on sewer and water (next section) are related to the building construction drawings (CD's) which will be the next step in the design process. MCG has responded and updated the plans were applicable for the public permitting phase of the project. The final CD's wilt not be prepared until after the public permitting process due to the extensive costs associated with preparing them which is common industry practice. We recommend that the Planning Board include a condition that the final utility designs be submitted to the Engineering Division or other applicable city departments for approval prior to construction. 1. SCS Comment: The proposed grease trap, as located on Plan Sheet C-4 does not comply with the property line setback requirements set forth by 310 CMR 15211. We suggest relocating the structure to meet these requirements. if the designer plans on leaving the structure at this location, a variance will be required and should be noted on the plans as such. MCG Response: 310 CMR 15.00 is the State Sanitary Code pertaining to septic systems and does not apply in an urban situation connecting to the municipal sewer system. Therefore, we wish to clarify for the administrative record that a variance is NOT required for this application of the grease trap. The grease trap will comply with local and state regulations related to the location, property line setbacks, size and other parameters of the grease trap placement. 2. SCS Comment:A 4"diameter sewer service is shown on Plan Sheet C-4 connecting to the 6"diameter inlet tee of the proposed grease trap. Please verify that the size of this service is correctly labelled MCG Response:The service was adjusted to 6". Final service size and locations will be verified during the building CD phase. 3. SCS Comment: The vertical position of the existing sewer main in WestA venue cannot be determined with the information provided. Stantec recommends adding the rim and invert elevations to the sewer manhole located within the intersection between Lafayette Street and West Avenue. Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 9 MCG Response: The rim and invert were added for the intersection manhole. The sewer main falls below the water main presuming a 5' burial depth on the water main. Utility crossings will be designed during the building CD phase. 4. SCS Comment: Stantec recommends adding sewer invert elevations at all service exists from the building envelope. MCG Response: The sewer invert elevations will be calculated during the building CD phase. S. SCS Comment: Note 2, as shown within the Commercial Line Grease Trap Detail should be updated to reflect the subject project. MCG Response:The note was updated. 6. SCS Comment: The Typical Sewer Manhole detail shown on sheet 001 makes reference to a 'Drain Pipe" Stantec recommends specifying 'Sewer'or removing this callout MCG Response: The note was updated to clarify "sanitary sewer'. 7. SCS Comment: Stantec recommends providing a water-tight connection(s) to the proposed manhole with a boot or other similar type connection. MCG Response: A note was added for a water tight boot connection. 8. SCS Comment: Stantec recommends the Utility Trench Detail shown on Sheet DO3 be modified to provide reference to the proposed PVC sewer. Currently, the detail ontv specifies details for the water and/or fire service. MCG Response: The utility trench detail was revised. See response above. Task 34.4 - Water (Lotz) 1. SCS Comment: Plans indicate a proposed 4-inch fire connection off of the existing 12-inch water main in West A venue and a proposed copper service for domestic use. No size is indicated and a note indicates that the MEP Engineer will determine sizes prior to construction. Stantec recommends that the proponent complete a hydrant flow test at the project site to confirm that the existing water distribution system can supply the domestic and fire protection requirements for this project without improvements to the existing City infrastructure. MCG Response: A hydrant flow test will be conducted by the project MEP engineer during the building CD phase. 2. SCS Comment: No domestic water shut off(curb stop and box)is shown on the plans. Stantec recommends the location be identified on the plans and a detail be provided MCG Response: The shutoff and gate valve for the domestic and fire services were added to the plan. 3. SCS Comment: The utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates a bury depth of 18-inches for the fire protection service line. Stantec recommends that this bury depth be increased to a minimum of feet of co ver to prevent freezing. MCG Response: The utility trench detail was updated. See response above. The minimum depth of cover over water or fire services shall be 5'. 4. SCS Comment: The Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates 'all pipes shall be SDR35 PVC (see plan for sizes and types)" if the purpose of this detail is to coverall utility trenches, Stantec Salem Planning Board May 5,2016 10 recommends that the reference to pipe material should be removed Consider providing trench details for water and sewer. MCG Response:The utility trench detail was updated. See response above. We trust these responses satisfy your questions and concerns about the project. If you have any 4EM se do not hesitate to contact our office at (978) 887-8586. ME GROUP, INC. �`F.,,H zN or.u4Ss v�R� 0 SCO7f P. PE CWERONO CPAL No.47601afayette, LLC q�oTRFors»a� / Attorney Scott Grover F�0NAL Attachments Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement I, Scott P. Cameron. P.E., hereby notify the Salem Planning Board that I. have not witnessed; nor am aware of any existing illicit discharges at the site known as 331 Lafayette Street in Salem, Massachusetts. I also hereby certify that the development of said property as illustrated on the final plans entitled "Site Plan of Land in Salem, Massachuseetts 331-335 Lafayette Street and 5, 7 & 11 West Avenue (Asessors's Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 & 234) prepared for 331 Lafayette, LLC," prepared by The Morin- Cameron Group, Inc. dated February 25 2016 and as revised and approved b the Salem rY � PP Y Planning Board and maintenance thereof in accordance with the "Construction Period Pollution Prevention Plan" and "Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan" prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc dated February 25, 2016 and as revised and approved by the Salem Planning Board will not create any new illicit discharges. There is no warranty implied regarding future illicit discharges that may occur as a result of improper 9 Y construction or maintenance of the stormwater management system or unforeseen accidents. Name: Scott P. Cameron, P.E. Company: The Morin ameron qLf u , Inc. Title: Owner's a tative Signature: Date: filial2010 ES- 1 ES-2 Subcat hment 1 Subcat hment 2 DP1 DP2 Design Point 1 , Design Point 2, West Lafayette Street Ave SUbCBt Reach on Llnk Routing Diagram for Existing Watershed Analysis Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 5/5/2016 FHydroCADO 10.00-13 s/n 00401 O 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Watershed Analysis Prepared b Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 P Y HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.038 96 Gravel surface, HSG C (ES-1) 0.446 98 Paved parking, HSG C (ES-1, ES-2) 0.303 98 Roofs, HSG A (ES-1, ES-2) 0.179 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C (ES-1, ES-2) 0.966 93 TOTAL AREA Existing Watershed Analysis Type ///24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 @2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=39,236 sf 77.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.35 Tc=6.0 min CN=93 Runoff=2.41 cfs 0.176 of Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=2,824 sf 76.31% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.25 Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.17 cfs 0.012 of Reach DPI: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=2.41 cfs 0.176 of Outflow=2.41 cfs 0.176 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2 West Ave Inflow=0.17 cfs 0.012 of Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.012 of Total Runoff Area = 0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.188 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.34" 22.43% Pervious= 0.217 ac 77.57% Impervious = 0.749 ac Existing Watershed Analysis Type /// 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 2.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.176 af, Depth> 2.38' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 11,927 98 Roofs, HSG A 18,546 98 Paved parking, HSG C 7,116 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C 1,647 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 39,236 93 Weighted Average 8,763 22.33% Pervious Area 30,473 77.67% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Existing Watershed Analysis Type /1124-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 0.17 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.012 af, Depth> 2.25' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 1,287 98 Roofs, HSG A 868 98 Paved parking, HSG C 669 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C 2,824 92 Weighted Average 669 23.69% Pervious Area 2,155 76.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Existing Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.901 ac, 77.67% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.35' for 2-Year event Inflow = 2.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.176 of Outflow = 2.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.176 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Reach DP2: Design Point 2, West Ave [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.065 ac, 76.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.28' for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.17 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.012 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.012 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Watershed Analysis Type /// 24-hr 10-YearRainfall=4.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=39,236 sf 77.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.70" Tc=6.0 min CN=93 Runoff=3.71 cfs 0.278 of Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=2,824 sf 76.31% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.60" Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.26 cfs 0.019 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=3.71 cfs 0.278 of Outflow=3.71 cfs 0.278 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.26 cfs 0.019 of Outflow=0.26 cfs 0.019 of Total Runoff Area =0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.298 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.70" 22.43% Pervious = 0.217 ac 77.57% Impervious = 0.749 ac Existing Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 100-Year Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 0 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=39,236 sf 77.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.67' Tc=6.D min CN=93 Runoff=5.54 cfs 0.426 of Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment2 Runoff Area=2,824 sf 76.31% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.56" Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.39 cfs 0.030 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=5.54 cfs 0.426 of Outflow=5.54 cfs 0.426 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.39 cfs 0.030 of Outflow=0.39 cfs 0.030 of Total Runoff Area = 0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.456 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.66" 22.43% Pervious = 0.217 ac 77.57% Impervious = 0.749 ac P5C-R � PS-1-R PS-2 Roof Drywell PS-1-R Subcat hment 2 FD P 1] " PS-1 FP2 Design Point 1 , Subcatchment 1 - Design Point 2, West Lafayette Street Non-Roof Area Ave Subcat Reach On Link Routing Diagram for Proposed Watershed Analysis Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 5/5/2016 FHydroCADO 10.00-13 s/n 00401 0 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Watershed Analysis Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.622 98 Paved parking, HSG C (PS-1, PS-2) 0.209 98 Roofs, HSG A (PS-1-R) 0.135 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C (PS-1, PS-2) 0.966 94 TOTAL AREA IIL Proposed Watershed Analysis Type l// 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD0 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Runoff Area=31,129 sf 84.03% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.44" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.146 of Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-1-R Runoff Area=9,100 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.87" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.63 cfs 0.050 of Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment2 Runoff Area=1,831sf 50.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.67" Tc=6.0 min CN=85 Runoff=0.08 cfs 0.006 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=1.97 cfs 0.156 of Outflow=1.97 cfs 0.156 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 of Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Peak Elev=29.05' Storage=1,059 cf Inflow=0.63 cfs 0.050 of Discarded=0.01 cfs 0.020 of Primary=0.13 cfs 0.010 of Outflow=0.14 cfs 0.030 of Total Runoff Area = 0.966 ac Runoff Volume = 0.201 of Average Runoff Depth =2.50" 13.98% Pervious =0.135 ac 86.02% Impervious = 0.831 ac Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Non-Roof Area Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.146 af, Depth> 2.44" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 26,159 98 Paved parking, HSG C 4,970 72 Woods/grass comb., Good HSG C 31,129 94 Weighted Average 4,970 15.97% Pervious Area 26,159 84.03% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 1// 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-1-R Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Depth> 2.87' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 9,100 98 Roofs, HSG A 9,100 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Watershed Analysis Type ///24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 0 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth> 1.67" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 923 98 Paved parking, HSG C 908 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C 1,831 85 Weighted Average 908 49.59% Pervious Area 923 50.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-13 s/n 00401 0 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.924 ac, 87.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.02" for 2-Year event Inflow = 1.97 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.156 of Outflow = 1.97 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.156 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Watershed Analysis Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 11 Summary for Reach DP2: Design Point 2, West Ave [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.042 ac, 50.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.67" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 @2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Inflow Area = 0.209 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.87" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.63 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.050 of Outflow = 0.14 cfs @ 12.47 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af, Atten= 77%, Lag= 23.4 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 9.07 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Primary = 0.13 cfs @ 12.47 hrs, Volume= 0.010 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 29.05' @ 12.47 hrs Surf.Area= 580 sf Storage= 1,059 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 218.0 min calculated for 0.030 of(61% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 111.4 min ( 867.9- 756.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 27.00' 943 cf Stone Bed (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 1,839 cf Overall - 896 cf Embedded = 943 cf #2 27.50' 728 cf 7.00'W x 13.001 x 2.00'H Precast Concrete Galley x 4 Inside#1 896 cf Overall -6.0"Wall Thickness = 728 cf 1,671 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 27.00 580 0 0 30.17 580 1,839 1,839 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 24.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 107.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 24.25'/23.71' S= 0.00507 Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 28.90' 0.8' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 #3 Device 1 29.50' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 #4 Discarded 27.00' 1.020 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Phase-In= 0.10' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 9.07 hrs HW=27.11' (Free Discharge) t-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 12.47 hrs HW=29.05' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 't--1=Culvert (Passes 0.13 cfs of 6.29 cfs potential flow) �2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.13 cfs @ 1.09 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) r ` 1 Proposed Watershed Analysis Type /1124-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Runoff Area=31,129 sf 84.03% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.81" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=2.99 cfs 0.227 of Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-1-R Runoff Area=9,100 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.26" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.92 cfs 0.074 of Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment2 Runoff Area=1,831sf 50.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.91" Tc=6.0 min CN=85 Runoff=0.14 cfs 0.010 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=3.37 cfs 0.258 of Outflow=3.37 cfs 0.258 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.14 cfs 0.010 of Outflow=0.14 cfs 0.010 of Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Peak Elev=29.32' Storage=1,192 cf Inflow=0.92 cfs 0.074 of Discarded=0.01 cfs 0.022 of Primary=0.63 cfs 0.031 of Outflow=0.65 cfs 0.053 of Total Runoff Area =0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.311 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.87" 13.98% Pervious =0.136 ac 86.02% Impervious= 0.831 ac Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 100-Year Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 20 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Runoff Area=31,129 sf 84.03% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.79" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=4.44 cfs 0.345 of Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-11-R Runoff Area=9,100 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.26" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.33 cfs 0.109 of Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=1,831 sf 50.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.77" Tc=6.0 min CN=85 Runoff=0.23 cfs 0.017 of Reach DPI: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=5.54 cfs 0.407 of Outflow=5.54 cfs 0.407 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.23 cfs 0.017 of Outflow=0.23 cfs 0.017 of Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Peak Elev=29.51' Storage=1,288 cf Inflow=1.33 cfs 0.109 of Discarded=0.01 cfs 0.024 of Primary=1.19 cfs 0.063 of Outflow=1.21 cfs 0.086 of Total Runoff Area=0.966 ac Runoff Volume = 0.470 of Average Runoff Depth =5.84" 13.98% Pervious =0.135 ac 86.02% Impervious = 0.831 ac The Morin-Cameron May 5, 2016 Salem Planning Board c/o Ms. Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner Department of Planning &Community Development Salem City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street, 31 Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: Response to Peer Review Comments 331 Lafayette Street Redevelopment Salem, Massachusetts Dear Ms. Chiancola and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of 331 Lafayette Street, LLC (Applicant), The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. (MCG) has provided the following responses to comments issued by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc (SCS) on May 3, 2016. The SCS comments are italicized and listed below followed by the MCG responses. Included with this submission is the following: - Plan set entitled "Site Plan of Land in Salem, Massachusetets 331-335 Lafayette Street & 5, 7 & 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 &234) Prepared for 331 Lafayette, LLC" prepared by MCG on February 25, 2016 and revised through April 5, 2016. - Supplemental stormwater management information prepared by MCG We offer the following in response to the SCS comments: Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements (Cloutier) 1. SCS Comment: The proposed design consists of one-way circulation with 90-degree parking. Angle parking is typically used when one-way circulation is proposed to encourage the one-way circulation. if 90-degree parking is allowed, it is very likely that some drivers leaving the parking spots will drive the wrong way. Consider modifying the parking stalls to angled parking. This may result in fewer parking spaces. MCG Response: The parking lot design considered many factors in addition to complying with the zoning ordinance dimensional requirements for parking, as it does now. The use of the property wilt be primarily for office with an accessory retail component. The retail, for all intents, is primarily intended to cater to walk up business as is customary at the existing site. The office use will be regular drivers who will have familiarity with the parking area with regular use. This familiarity factor was a part of the design process for the parking area as it is shown on the plans. The Applicant, who wilt be responsible for the parking conditions as a private land owner, was comfortable with this design and it does not present any limitations with respect to emergency vehicle access. Notwithstanding the above, the plans have been revised to include a slight angle to the main entrance aisle parking spaces entering from Lafayette Street. This will ensure that drivers wilt follow the correct route to the West CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LAND USE PLANNERS 447 Boston Street (U.S. Route 1) Topsfield, MA 01983 978.887.8586 FAX 978.887.3480 Providing Professional Services Since 1978 www.morincameron.com 1 Salem Planning Board May 5,2016 2 Avenue exit. The other parking spaces on the eastern portion of the site, a driver who accidentally turns in the wrong direction can turnaround in the parking area. Signage and pavement markings will provide adequate directional instruction for drivers. 2. SCS Comment: The proposed driveway aisles are 20 feet, 21.5 feet and 22 feet wide. Typically, 24- foot-wide aisles are needed for 90-degree parking. Widths narrower than this are difficult from drivers to turn into parking spaces. Narrower widths can be used if angled parking is proposed MCG Response: In addition to angling the spaces on the main entrance aisle which addresses the 20- foot width concern in that aisle, the design generally complies with aisle industry parking design standards. Most parking codes and engineering practice require an 18' space, 24' aisle and an 18' space for a total width, curb to curb, of 60'. In Salem, the ordinance requires a 19' space with the option to include a 2' overhanging. Aisles can be reduced to as low as 20'. In this application, the eastern portion of the site has aisles varying in width from 21.5', 21.7' and 22'. Parking spaces will be 19' deep on each side, some with the overhang. This meets, or nearly meets, the industry standard of 60' curb to curb and more importantly meets the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, it is the position of MCG that the aisles satisfactorily meet industry standards and the Salem Zoning Ordinance for parking lot design. 3. SCSComment. Typical parking space depth is 18 feet The proposed plan includes 19-foot-deep parking spaces near walkways and 17 feet where the vehicle can overhang landscaped area. This is sufficient for most of the site, but can create conflicts at two locations. Near the proposed transformer pad on the eastern side of the site, vehicles in the two short spaces on each side of the transformer can block each other if the driver doesn't pull up far enough. This can be rectified by moving the four spaces westerly by a couple feet. Similarly, the parking spaces in the northeast corner present a conflict if drivers don't pull up far enough. This can be rectified by moving the two spaces westerly by a couple feet MCG Response:The parking aisle has been shifted 2' along the east side line row of parking, away from the 2 isolated spaces to the east of the transformer. The adjacent row of 4 parking spaces to the south was shifted 2' to the west. In addition, "small car' parking signs will be added to the end 2 parking spaces to deter larger vehicles from parking in those locations. This changes will ensure vehicles parking on the corners are not obstructed. 4. SCS Comment. The parking space immediately adjacent to the entrance is located very close to the property entrance. When a driver backs out of this spot, they will block the entrance and likely back over the sidewalk. Consider eliminating this spot. MCG Response: The parking space adjacent to the entrance on Lafayette was angled to allow a shallower backing movement to exit the space. In addition, a "small car' parking sign will be posted to deter larger vehicles from parking in that location. 5. SCS Comment: The concrete cement sidewalk should extend across the driveways. MCG Response: Concrete driveway aprons were identified on the site layout plan. The driveway detail was revised to illustrate a concrete apron. 6. SCS Comment Deliveries areas are not shown. What types of delivery vehicles are expected? Can they fit in a standard parking space? Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 3 MCG Response: Deliveries to the site are not anticipated to require large trailer trucks. The majority of deliveries are anticipated to fit within the normal parking spots. Routine deliveries by small, box trucks will be anticipated for the accessory retail use which encompasses a small portion of this project. Deliveries will primarily occur during off-peak business hours so the parking lot will be available to temporarily use parking spaces for offloading. This will be coordinated between the owner and potential lessees of the property. Other Comments SCS Comment Proposed 'Stop"/'Do Not Enter'Signs are located close to the West Avenue sidewalk. MCG Response:The stop line and sign were shifted away from the sidewalk. SCS Comment.On sheet D-3, increase height of the Sign Post Detail to 7 feet of clearance from the ground to bottom of the sign. MCG Response: The sign post detail was adjusted to 7'. SCS Comment The landscaping plan show a planter and a tree on the southwestern corner of the property in the vicinity of the future traffic signal mast arm. Please relocate/remove. MCG Response:The tree was removed from the corner near the signal mast arm. Task 34.1 -Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements (Rayno) 1. SCS Comment: The proposed permanent sidewalk easement should provide a minimum of 3'clear around the pedestrian signal and push button mount at the corner of West Avenue and Lafayette Street to ensure a compliant path of travel within the City Right of Way. MCG Response:The sidewalk easement was adjusted to accommodate 3' around the mast arm base. 2. SCS Comment: Consider identifying existing trees to be removed on either the Existing Conditions Plan or Site Layout Plan, such as the existing tree located just behind the existing fence between 327 and 331 Lafayette Street. MCG Response:A note was added to the site plan that "All existing trees within the subject premises will be removed except as specifically noted hereon" 3. SCS Comment: Proposed driveways on Site Plan should be shown as cement concrete driveways consistent with the detail on D-2 Construction Details/l. MCG Response: Concrete driveway aprons were identified on the site layout plan. The driveway detail was revised to illustrate a concrete apron. 4. SCS Comment: Provide a detail for concrete curb as labelled as "CC"on the Site Layout Plan. Clarify differences between "CC"and 'PCC"(precast concrete curb. MCG Response:All curb will be precast concrete. The notes were adjusted on the Site Layout Plan. 5. SCS Comment: The proposed 9'wide parking stall width does not provide adequate space for a driver/passenger to exit the vehicle adjacent to the dumpster pad and fence enclosure. MCG Response: This parking space complies with the geometric requirements of the zoning ordinance. Frequent users of the parking lot for the office space will be accustomed to parking there so the adjacent dumpster will"self-regulate' or deter larger vehicles from parking there. Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 4 6. SCS Comment: Per the 521 CMR:Architectural Access Board section 32.21 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a parking lot with 69 total spaces would require 3 accessible spaces with one being van accessible. MCG Response: A 3rd handicap space was added in front of the building with a 5' loading space and handicap ramp. The landscape island on West Avenue was reduced to the Zoning Ordinance minimum of 5' to accommodate this change. 7. SCS Comment: Replace the word "staked"with "stacked"in the curbing notes MCG Response:This scriveners error was corrected. 8. SCS Comment: Provide a proposed gutter grade opposite the existing roadwaygrade of'32.42"on WestAvenue to ensure positive drainage on WestAvenue. MCG Response:The spot grade was added to the Grading and Utility Plan. 9. SCS Comment: Proposed sidewalk grade '3260"at the intersection of the WestA venue sidewalk and eastern walkway adjacent to the building would cause the sidewalk to slope back toward the building if a 6"reveal is used at the gutter. Consider revising the elevation to '3270"to ensure positive drainage to the gutter. MCG Response: The grades at the south east corner of the building were adjusted accordingly. 10. SCS Comment: Per the 521 CMR.-Architectural Access Board section 32.2.1 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a wheelchair ramp curb cut shall have a level landing with a 4'length. Revise curb ramp details on D-2 Construction Details/l accordingly MCG Response:The curb cut details were revised to illustrate 4' landing areas. 11. SCS Comment: Replace "??"with "114"on lip label in the Accessible Curb Ramp(ACR) Type B'detail on D-2 Construction Details A MCG Response: This scriveners error was corrected. 12. SCS Comment: Consider using a plastic sleeve to form the rounded cap in the bollard detail rather than formed concrete. Formed concrete have undesirable results during and after curing. MCG Response:The bollard detail was revised to include a rounded plastic cap. 13. SCS Comment: Locate and label the locations where bollard mounted signs are installed on the Site Layout Plan. Consider revising 5'min dimension to something higher as signs mounted that low may be hit by larger vehicles. MCG Response:There are no longer any bollard signs on the plans. The detail was removed. Task 34.2 - Drainage (Broyles) MassDEP Stormwater Standards The initial submittal did not include a stormwater management summary since the project is not subject to the Wetlands Protection Act and the MassDEP Stormwater Management Standards are not referenced in the Zoning Ordinance. Nonetheless, we concur with SCS that adherence to the standards, to the extent practicable, is good engineering practice and a commonly used guide for development projects regardless of legal applicability. The following is a summary of these standards for the administrative record. Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 5 A. SCS Comment: Standard No. 1 requires no untreated stormwater discharges or erosion to wetland resource areas. MCG has not provided and documentation or statement regarding this standard. We recommend the MCG provide this information to the Department for review. MCG Response:The project will not discharge to a wetland or cause erosion to a wetland. The discharge will be to the municipal storm sewer. Roof runoff from the 9,100 square foot footprint building will be directed to a subsurface infiltrating drywetl. The remaining parking and landscape areas will result in a reduction in tributary pavement surface area draining directly to the municipal storm sewer. As a result of this reduction, peak flows will be reduced from the property. A basic HydroCAD watershed analysis is provided herewith confirming that runoff from the site towards West Avenue and Lafayette Street will be reduced in the 2, 10 and 100-year storm events. Storm Existing Runoff(CFS) Proposed Runoff (CFS) Lafayette Street 2-yr 2.41 1.97 10-yr 3.71 3.37 100-yr 5.54 5.54 West Avenue 2-yr 0.17 0.08 10-yr 0.26 0.14 100-yr 0.39 0.23 The project complies with this standard. B. SCS Comment.,Standard No. 2 requires peak flow attenuation lie. no increase in peak stormwater discharge rates)MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this standard. We recommend the MCG provide this information to the Department for review. MCG Response: See response 1 above. The project complies with this standard. C. SCS Comment. Standard No. 3 requires the loss of annual recharge to groundwater be minimized through the use of infiltration measures and annual recharge from post-development shall approximate the annual recharge from pre-development conditions. The Stormwater Management Summary documents the provided recharge volume by the Subsurface Recharge System exceeds the required recharge volume. However, we recommend the documentation be provided to verify the Subsurface Recharge System will drain within 72 hours MCG Response:The recharge system will drain within 72 hours: Drawdown caiculation: Static Method Draw Down Time = 916 CF / (1.02 in/hr/(1 ft./l2in.) ' 580 SF stone base) = 18.6 hours The project complies with this standard. D. SCS Comment Standard No. 4 requires the stormwater management system include a series of Best Management Practices(8MPs) to demonstrate a total suspended solids(TSS)removal rate of a least 80 percent The MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this requirement. Further we recommend the required water quality volume be addressed by the applicant. Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 6 Standard 4 requires the development and implementation of suitable practices for source control and pollution prevention. These measures must be identified in a long-term pollution prevention plan (L TPPP). The LTPPP may be prepared as a separate document,or combined with the Operations and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9. The applicant has submitted the L TPPP under a separate cover and reviewed as a part of this Standard. We recommend the applicant discuss storing materials and waste products inside or under cover and the spill prevention/response. MCG Response: As stated in the initial submittal and corroborated by SCS later in this report, the project is a redevelopment project. As such, it is required to comply with the standards to the maximum extent practicable. The stormwater management system will be constructed using deep- sump and hooded outlet pipes configured in an offline manner. The catch basins will achieve 25%TSS removal efficiency from the site. It will also eliminate runoff which presently sheet flows directly to the street surface. In the existing condition, there is no TSS removal of runoff and therefore the redevelopment will result in an improvement over existing conditions with regard to treatment of runoff and removing surface runoff from the roadway. The LTPPP discusses provisions for storing chemicals inside. This meets the redevelopment standard 7 outlined below. The spill prevention plan was revised accordingly. The project complies with this standard to the maximum extent practicable. E. SCS Comment Standard No. 5 requires the use of specific stormwater management BMPs from Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollution Loads(LUhPPLs). It is Stantec's opinion the project is not in an area of LUHPPL. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. MCG Response: The project is not a Land Use with a Higher Potential Pollutant Load and is not subject to this standard. The project complies with this standard. F. SCS Comment.• Standard No. 6 Critical Areas It is Stantec's opinion the project is not in a critical area. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. MCG Response:The project does not discharge to a critical area. The project complies with this standard. G. SCS Comment Standard No. 7 Redevelopment Project. It is Stantec's opinion that the Site Plan qualifies as a redevelopment project. We recommend the application provide a statement to the Department. MCG Response:As noted above, the project will result in a significant improvement to the stormwater conditions of the site as a result of redevelopment. With the exception of Standard 4 above, the project will fully comply with the Stormwater Management Standards discussed herein. Water quality will be provided to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating catch basins with deep sumps and hooded outlets. The project complies with this standard. H. SCS Comment. Standard No. 8 requires and erosion and sedimentation control plan be developed and implemented to provide impacts during construction and land disturbance activities The submitted stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan include a discussion of erosion and sedimentation controls during Construction. We recommend the Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 7 aforementioned erosion controls be identified on drawing C-4. further we recommend a schedule for construction and stormwater management activities be provided on the site plans. We recommend the submitted erosion control plans include construction phasing, location of material stockpiles, equipment storage, and refueling areas. MCG Response:The silt fence and silt sacks have been added to Sheet C-4 of the plans. A general construction sequence is included on the plans as well. However, the final construction schedule, sequence and management plan for the stormwater related activities cannot be finalized until the General Contractor is selected for the project. The GC will prepare this plan as part of the project construction documents package. As discussed previously, it is not customary to have this information finalized during the permitting phase of the project and is more customarily part of the CD package. If requested by the Board, the applicant can provide this information to the planning department along with the final CD's for the project. The project complies with this standard by providing the erosion control plan for construction. Additional information can be provided to the planning department with the final CD's for the project. I. SCS Comment: Standard No. 9 requires all stormwater management systems have a long-term operation and maintenance plan to ensure the systems function as designed. The submitted Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan includes information regarding the Owner of the Stormwater Management System. The submitted LTPPP, as discussed under Standard 4, includes information about the maintenance tasks, mentions the party orparties responsible for the O&M of the BMP during construction. We recommend the applicant identify the party or parties responsible for operation and maintenance of the Stormwater system after construction. MCG Response: The applicant, or future land owner, will be responsible for maintenance of the stormwater system as noted in the LTPPP. The project complies with this standard. J. SGS Comment Standard No, 10 Prohibition of Illicit Discharges We note that as part of the Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan, MCG has provided information relative to prevention of illicit discharges We recommend the applicant provide a signed Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement verifying that no illicit discharges exist on the site. The project complies with this standard. General Comments 1. SCS Comment: The flow direction of the 12" VC Drain on West Avenue appears to be incorrect based in surveyed inverts MCG Response: The flow direction was illustrated correctly. The pipe invert and rim was corrected. 2. SCS Comment: The slope and flow direction should be identified on all proposed drainage pipes on the Grading, Drainage&Utility Plan, Drawing No. C-4. MCG Response:The slopes and flow directions for all proposed pipes were added to the plans. 3. SCS Comment: The Outlet Control Structure(OCS-1), as shown on Drawing No. C-4 identifies the Invert B as 24.30, however the detail on Drawing No. D-3, identifies it as 24.38. Salem Planning Board May 5,2016 8 MCG Response: The invert was corrected on the detail to 24.30. 4. SCS Comment: The baffle elevation identified within the 005-1, as shown on Drawing No. D-3 will interfere with the precast flat top as shown. MCG Response: The baffle elevation was corrected to elevation 29.40. S. SCS Comment: The 005 detail identifies a 4"orifice,however, the section identifies a baffle. MCG Response: The detail was corrected to illustrate a baffle. 6. SCS Comment: The Precast Typical Catch Basin should identify the hood as shown on the detail. MCG Response:The hooded outlet note was moved to point to the graphic illustration of the hood. 7. SCS Comment: As noted in the Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan, deep sump catch basins, with a four(4)foot sump, are being proposed. The detail on Drawing No. D-3 identifies the sump as three(3) feet MassDEP requires deep sump catch basin to have a four(4)sump. MCG Response: The sumps were adjusted to 48" (4'). 8. SCS Comment: The Utility Trench Detail on Drawing No. D-3 is for all utilities except Drainage utilities. The detail should be clarified, or a new detail created, to incorporate installation of drainage pipe. MCG Response:The utility trench detail was updated to reflect gravity pipe construction parameters with a note to change the bedding to sand for any water or fire suppression pipes. Task 34.3 - Sewer (Kucharski/Silva) Generally, several of the comments on sewer and water (next section) are related to the building construction drawings (CD's) which will be the next step in the design process. MCG has responded and updated the plans were applicable for the public permitting phase of the project. The final CD's will not be prepared until after the public permitting process due to the extensive costs associated with preparing them which is common industry practice. We recommend that the Planning Board include a condition that the final utility designs be submitted to the Engineering Division or other applicable city departments for approval prior to construction. 1. SCS Comment: The proposedgrease trap, as located on Plan Sheet C-4 does not comply with the property line setback requirements set forth by 310 CMR 15.211. We suggest relocating the structure to meet these requirements, if the designer plans on leaving the structure at this location, a variance will be required and should be noted on the plans as such. MCG Response: 310 CMR 15.00 is the State Sanitary Code pertaining to septic systems and does not apply in an urban situation connecting to the municipal sewer system. Therefore, we wish to clarify for the administrative record that a variance is NOT required for this application of the grease trap. The grease trap will comply with local and state regulations related to the location, property line setbacks, size and other parameters of the grease trap placement. 2. SCS Comment:A 4"diameter sewer service is shown on Plan Sheet C-4 connecting to the 6"diameter inlet tee of the proposed grease trap. Please verify that the size of this service is correctly labelled. MCG Response: The service was adjusted to 6". Final service size and locations will be verified during the building CD phase. 3. SCS Comment: The vertical position of the existing sewer main in West Avenue cannot be determined with the information provided. Stantec recommends adding the rim and invert elevations to the sewer manhole located within the intersection between Lafayette Street and West Avenue. Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 9 MCG Response: The rim and invert were added for the intersection manhole. The sewer main falls below the water main presuming a 5' burial depth on the water main. Utility crossings will be designed during the building CD phase. 4. SCS Comment: Stantec recommends adding sewer invert elevations at all service exists from the building envelope. MCG Response:The sewer invert elevations will be calculated during the building CD phase. 5. SCS Comment: Note 2, as shown within the Commercial Line Grease Trap Detail should be updated to reflect the subject project MGG Response: The note was updated. 6. SCS Comment: The Typical Sewer Manhole detail shown on sheet DO makes reference to a 'Drain Pipe' Stantec recommends specifying 'Sewer'or removing this callout. MCG Response: The note was updated to clarify "sanitary sewer'. 7. SCS Comment: Stantec recommends providing a water-tight connection(s) to the proposed manhole with a boot or other similar type connection. MCG Response:A note was added for a water tight boot connection. 8. SCS Comment: Stantec recommends the Utility Trench Detail shown on Sheet D03 be modified to provide reference to the proposed PVC sewer Currently, the detail only specifies details for the water and/or fire service MCG Response: The utility trench detail was revised. See response above. Task 34.4 - Water (Lotz) t. SCS Comment: Plans indicate a proposed 4-inch fire connection off of the existing 12-inch water main in West Avenue and a proposed copper service for domestic use. No size is indicated and a note indicates that the MEP Engineer will determine sizes prior to construction. Stantec recommends that the proponent complete a hydrant flow test at the project site to confirm that the existing water distribution system can supply the domestic and fire protection requirements for this project without improvements to the existing City infrastructure. MGG Response: A hydrant flow test will be conducted by the project MEP engineer during the building CD phase. 2. SCS Comment: No domestic water shut off(curb stop and box)is shown on the plans. Stantec recommends the location be identified on the plans and a detail be provided. MCG Response:The shutoff and gate valve for the domestic and fire services were added to the plan. 3. SCS Comment: The utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates a bury depth of 18-inches for the fire protection service line. Stantec recommends that this bury depth be increased to a minimum of feet of cover to prevent freezing. MCG Response:The utility trench detail was updated. See response above. The minimum depth of cover over water or fire services shall be 5'. 4. SCS Comment: The Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates 'all pipes shall be SDR35 PVC (see plan for sizes and types)" if the purpose of this detail is to coverall utility trenches, Stantec Salem Planning Board May 5, 2016 10 recommends that the reference to pipe material should be removed Consider providing trench details for water and sewer. MCG Response:The utility trench detail was updated. See response above. We trust these responses satisfy your questions and concerns about the project. If you have any questions, lease do not hesitate to contact our office at (978) 887-8586. Sincerely THE M ME GROUP, INC. I y�r k1°,4v.f �ZH of Ply`\i - PE o scow P. c CAMFIRON Princi al uCIVIL y v Na.47601 Cc 331 Lafayette, LLC ��J �FGISTE¢FO l Attorney Scott Grover fissr^,, Attachments Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement I, Scott P. Cameron. P.E., hereby notify the Salem Planning Board that I have not witnessed, nor am aware of any existing illicit discharges at the site known as 331 Lafayette Street in Salem, Massachusetts. I also hereby certify that the development of said property as illustrated on the final plans entitled "Site Plan of Land in Salem, Massachuseetts 331-335 Lafayette Street and 5, 7 & 11 West Avenue (Asessors's Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 & 234) prepared for 331 Lafayette, LLC," prepared by The Morin- Cameron Group, Inc. dated February 25, 2016 and as revised and approved by the Salem Planning Board and maintenance thereof in accordance with the "Construction Period Pollution Prevention Plan" and "Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan" prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc dated February 25, 2016 and as revised and approved by the Salem Planning Board will not create any new illicit discharges. There is no warranty implied regarding future illicit discharges that may occur as a result of improper construction or maintenance of the stormwater management system or unforeseen accidents. Name: Scott P. Cameron, P.E. // Company: The Morin ameron 0 , Inc. Title: Owner'sa tative Signature: Date: ZD(fa l� !fid ;ES;-.2, Subcat hment 1 Subcat hment 2 x - P 'l3# DP2�' Design Point 1 , Design Point 2, West Lafayette Street Ave SU�OC2t Reach. , On,_g L�III{C Routing Diagram for Existing Watershed Analysis Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD010.00-13 s!n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Watershed Analysis Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.038 96 Gravel surface, HSG C (ES-1) 0.446 98 Paved parking, HSG C (ES-1, ES-2) 0.303 98 Roofs, HSG A (ES-1, ES-2) 0.179 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C (ES-1, ES-2) 0.966 93 TOTAL AREA Existing Watershed Analysis Type /// 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=39,236 sf 77.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.35 Tc=6.0 min CN=93 Runoff=2.41 cfs 0.176 of Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=2,824 sf 76.31% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.25 Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.17 cfs 0.012 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=2.41 cfs 0.176 of Outflow=2.41 cfs 0.176 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2, West Ave Inflow=0.17 cfs 0.012 of Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.012 of Total Runoff Area = 0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.188 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.34" 22.43% Pervious= 0.217 ac 77.57% Impervious = 0.749 ac Existing Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 6 Summary for Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 2.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.176 af, Depth> 2.35' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 11,927 98 Roofs, HSG A 18,546 98 Paved parking, HSG C 7,116 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C 1,647 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 39,236 93 Weighted Average 8,763 22.33% Pervious Area 30,473 77.67% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f/ft) (f/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Existing Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 0.17 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.012 af, Depth> 2.25' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 1,287 98 Roofs, HSG A 868 98 Paved parking, HSG C 669 72 Woods/grass comb. Good HSG C 2,824 92 Weighted Average 669 23.69% Pervious Area 2,155 76.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Existing Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.901 ac, 77.67% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.35' for 2-Year event Inflow = 2.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.176 of Outflow = 2.41 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.176 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 H droCADO 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 H droCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Y Y q Summary for Reach DP2: Design Point 2, West Ave [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.065 ac, 76.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.25' for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.17 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.012 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.012 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 0 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=39,236 sf 77.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.70" Tc=6.0 min CN=93 Runoff=3.71 cfs 0.278 of Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=2,824sf 76.31% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.60" Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff--0.26 cfs 0.019 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=3.71 cfs 0.278 of Outflow=3.71 cfs 0.278 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.26 cfs 0.019 of Outflow=0.26 cfs 0.019 of Total Runoff Area = 0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.298 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.70" 22.43% Pervious= 0.217 ac 77.57% Impervious = 0.749 ac Existing Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 100-Year Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment ES-1: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=39,236 sf 77.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.67" Tc=6.0 min CN=93 Runoff=5.54 cfs 0.426 of Subcatchment ES-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=2,824 sf 76.31% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.56" Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.39 cfs 0.030 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=5.54 cfs 0.426 of Outflow=5.54 cfs 0.426 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.39 cfs 0.030 of Outflow=0.39 cfs 0.030 of Total Runoff Area= 0.966 ac Runoff Volume =0.456 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.66" 22.43% Pervious = 0.217 ac 77.57% Impervious = 0.749 ac n Roof Drywell PS-1-R Subcat hment 2 DP1 '' PS ;1� DP2� Design Point 1 , Subcatchment 1 - Design Point 2, West Lafayette Street Non-Roof Area Ave S"ubCaY Rei h oriLlnk� Routing Diagram for Proposed Watershed Analysis Prepared by Microsoft. Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 00401 m 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Watershed Analysis Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.622 98 Paved parking, HSG C (PS-1, PS-2) 0.209 98 Roofs, HSG A (PS-1-R) 0.135 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C (PS-1, PS-2) 0.966 94 TOTAL AREA Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 @2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Scor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Runoff Area=31,129 sf 84.03% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.44" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.146 of Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-1-R Runoff Area=9,100 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.87" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.63 cfs 0.050 of Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment2 Runoff Area=1,831sf 50.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.67" Tc=6.0 min CN=85 Runoff=0.08 cfs 0.006 of Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=1.97 cfs 0.156 of Outflow=1.97 cfs 0.156 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 of Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Peak Elev=29.05' Storage=1,059 cf Inflow=0.63 cfs 0.050 of Discarded=0.01 cfs 0.020 of Primary=0.13 cfs 0.010 of Outflow=0.14 cfs 0.030 of Total Runoff Area=0.966 ac Runoff Volume=0.201 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.50" 13.98% Pervious = 0.135 ac 86.02% Impervious = 0.831 ac Proposed Watershed Analysis Type /// 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 7 Summary for Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Non-Roof Area Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.146 af, Depth> 2.44" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 26,159 98 Paved parking, HSG C 4,970 72 Woods/grass comb. Good HSG C 31,129 94 Weighted Average 4,970 15.97% Pervious Area 26,159 84.03% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-1-R Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Depth> 2.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 9,100 98 Roofs, HSG A 9,100 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth> 1.67' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Area (sf) CN Description 923 98 Paved parking, HSG C 908 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C 1,831 85 Weighted Average 908 49.59% Pervious Area 923 50.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Reach DP1: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.924 ac, 87.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.02" for 2-Year event Inflow = 1.97 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.156 of Outflow = 1.97 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.156 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 111 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 0 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Reach DP2: Design Point 2, West Ave [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.042 ac, 50.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.67" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Watershed Analysis Type ll/ 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Inflow Area = 0.209 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.87" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.63 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.050 of Outflow = 0.14 cfs @ 12.47 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af, Atten= 77%, Lag= 23.4 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 9.07 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Primary = 0.13 cfs @ 12.47 hrs, Volume= 0.010 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 29.05' @ 12.47 hrs Surf.Area= 580 sf Storage= 1,059 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 218.0 min calculated for 0.030 of(61% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 111.4 min ( 867.9 - 756.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 27.00' 943 cf Stone Bed (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 1,839 cf Overall - 896 cf Embedded = 943 cf #2 27.50' 728 cf 7.00'W x 13.001 x 2.00'H Precast Concrete Galley x 4 Inside#1 896 cf Overall - 6.0" Wall Thickness = 728 cf 1,671 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 27.00 580 0 0 30.17 580 1,839 1,839 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 24.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 107.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 24.25' / 23.71' S= 0.0050 'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 28.90' 0.8' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 #3 Device 1 29.50' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 #4 Discarded 27.00' 1.020 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Phase-In= 0.10' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 9.07 hrs HW=27.11' (Free Discharge) t4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 12.47 hrs HW=29.05' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.13 cfs of 6.29 cfs potential flow) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.13 cfs @ 1.09 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Watershed Analysis Type 11124-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 00401 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Runoff Area=31,129 sf 84.03% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.81" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=2.99 cfs 0.227 of Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-1-R Runoff Area=9,100 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.26" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.92 cfs 0.074 of Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=1,831 sf 50.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.91" Tc=6.0 min CN=85 Runoff=0.14 cfs 0.010 of Reach DPI: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=3.37 cfs 0.258 of Outflow=3.37 cfs 0.258 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.14 cfs 0.010 of Outflow=0.14 cfs 0.010 of Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Peak Elev=29.32' Storage=1,192 cf Inflow=0.92 cfs 0.074 of Discarded=0.01 cfs 0.022 of Primary=0.63 cfs 0.031 of Outflow=0.65 cfs 0.053 of Total Runoff Area= 0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.311 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.87" 13.98% Pervious =0.135 ac 86.02% Impervious= 0.831 ac Proposed Watershed Analysis Type ///24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/5/2016 HydroCAD0 10.00-13 s/n 00401 02014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PS-1: Subcatchment 1 - Runoff Area=31,129 sf 84.03% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.79" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=4.44 cfs 0.345 of Subcatchment PS-1-R: PS-1-11 Runoff Area=9,100 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.26" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.33 cfs 0.109 of Subcatchment PS-2: Subcatchment2 Runoff Area=1,831 sf 50.41% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.77" Tc=6.0 min CN=85 Runoff=0.23 cfs 0.017 of Reach DPI: Design Point 1, Lafayette Street Inflow=5.54 cfs 0.407 of Oufflow=5.54 cfs 0.407 of Reach DP2: Design Point 2,West Ave Inflow=0.23 cfs 0.017 of Outflow=0.23 cfs 0.017 of Pond P5C-R: Roof Drywell Peak Elev=29.51' Storage=1,288 cf Inflow=1.33 cfs 0.109 of Discarded=0.01 cfs 0.024 of Primary=1.19 cfs 0.063 of Outflow=1.21 cfs 0.086 of Total Runoff Area = 0.966 ac Runoff Volume= 0.470 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.84" 13.98% Pervious =0.135 ac 86.02% Impervious = 0.831 ac LYILLLLLLV �♦LLll V1111V Yat L U�Y L Vl J Belmuro"m Wall Character of natural stone with affordability of concrete Available in Umbdano(R)finish,Belmuro' Wall will easily complement or harmonize with your paver choice. Natural Stone or Ledgestone^ coping are perfect design partners. r I}, f A 'L AU ' t r - Colors ..w. ka.+ r f '46- Autumn Sunset Midnight Sky Summer Wheat Winter Marvel Shapes & Sizes 1 .. // •1 1 / t / . 111 /1/f, .l A/19//�/ 1 ! l✓VL111µLV „µll VLL1iV V1\ 1 LL�V L Vl ✓ Full Unit Half Unit Corner Unit Half Comer Unit 50.5 cm x 25.2 cm x 16.5 25.2 cm x 25.2 om x 16.5 50.5 cm x 25.2 cm x 16.5 25.2 cm x 25.2 cm x 16,5 Orn cm cm om 19.75"x9.75"x6.5" 9.75"x9.75"x6.5" 19.75"x9.75"x6.5" 9.75"x9,75"x6.5" Features Technologies ColorFusionT Technology Random surface colour for a natural granite-like appearance. EasyCleanTM Stain Resistance An integral surface protection that allows for easier cleanup of spills when they happen,and before a stain can develop. EnduraColornO Plus EnduraColor Plus is the defining difference when it comes to superior wear resistance and color longevity.EnduraColor Plus is not a coating or secondary treatment,but rather a proprietary blended layer of nature's highest performing minerals(which never fade)that have been embedded right Into the surface of each stone during the manufacturing process.This ensures that the surface will not fade,crack,peel or delaminate,and the beauty of your project will last a lifetime. Applications Gardens Pillars Seat Walls Steps Surface Texture Smooth•Zero Bevel Patterns No records found. LY1L1N1V ��µll I V�41VY1\ 1 LL�-Y J VL J Packaging Unit Thickness Sq.Ft.Layer Layers and]. Lbs Snell, Units Bndl. Full Unit 16.5 0.00 2 1503 24 Half Unit 16.5 0.00 1 747 24 Comer Unit 16.5 0.00 2 1741 24 Half Comer Unit 16.5 0.00 1 985 24 Additional Belmuror" Walt Information Sold in full bundles only and is produced and sold on a required,refundable skid. The Belmuro blocks are factory-produced concrete elements featuring two chambers arranged in a row.Any wall over 39"in height may be subject to permit requirements and engineering analysis.Always consult with your local authorities before beginning your project. Important Information 9 All measurements are nominal Colors,product date,and availability are subject to change without notice.Please confirm all details with your local Unlock Dealer or call 1.800-UNILOCK(1-800-864-5625)for availability in your area.The colors shown should only be used as a guide.Final color selections should always be made from actual samples. i aviiwauuwaa�. � vaauvva. . ,A��. i �i-r HollandstoneTM A versatile paver with a wide range of color options With its wide range of colors, Hollandstone is a favorite for many because of the design flexibility it provides.Available in one size this paver can be laid in various patterns. Altin41 rj13 , z r ..iR �� • Iii I 4�xy� +-+fir� »r„�,,► Colors LLa Autumn Redd Charcoal �r Prairie Red if River Rustic Red Sierra ., a •, , , � ,,, .. .,..-. ..... . 1.1V11W1LLJ4V11V VLLLV VLI 1 µ�.V L Vl l' Shapes & Sizes Standard Heavy Duty 20 cm 10 cm x 8cm 20 cm x 10 cm x 8 cm 7.75"x 3.75"x 2.25" 7.75"x 3.75"x 3" Design Combinations -� The finishing touches to your project lies in the exceptional borders and accents that you incorporate into your landscape features. Looking for more options _ . .. the pictures featured on the right?Create your own design combinations by clicking the button below! Create Your Own .. . _ J ;] 11V 11 W14J1Vll�r I V1111V411 a 4C��. J Vl l Features Applications Borders&Accents Commercial Vehicular Pedestrian Residential Vehicular Surface Texture Standard Patterns i i i Hollandstone B Hollandstone C Hollandstone D Standard(100%) Standard(100%) Standard(100%) aauaawauuwaa� I vivav�.aa a use � va-r Packaging Unit Sq.Ft Sq.Ft. Layers Ln Ft Bndl. Units Lbs Lbs Units Thickness Bndl. Layer Bndl. Soldier Sq.Ft Bndl. Sec. Sndl. Standard 6 117.9 11.79 10 177.2 4.58 3065 511 540 Heavy Duty 8 82.5 11.79 7 124 4.58 2960 493 378 Important Information Hollendstone Is a very popular value paver. The simple lines and patterns make it easy to work with.Add a special look to Hollandstone by incorporating Unigranite or Series 3000 banding and Insets. Base Requirement&Bedding Course-standard paver base specification. Handling and Installation-A protective Pad is required when doing the final paver compaction Both herringbone and linear patterns are common. Jointing Material and Joint Stabilization - Good:ordinary dryjoint sand Best:Any Polymeric Sand or ordinary dry(joint sand stabilized by a water-based or solvent-based joint sand stabilizer seater.Important:squeegee water from surface during polymeric sand activation to prevent a white residue fromfonning. Special Note:Use Alliance Gator Max Polymeric Sand(overlays) Sealers • Product may be sealed but it is not absolutely required • Unilock Unicare,Surebond, BP Pro and Techniseal sealers can be used. • Select type for desired aesthetics. • Product must be deaned before sealing Cleaners-Any paver cleaner may be used for color restoration or general cleaning.Follow manufacturer's dilution rales and application procedures. 8 All measurements are nominal Colors,product data,and availability are subject to change without notice.Please confirm all details with your local Unilock Dealer or call 1-800-UNILOCK(1.800-864-5625)for availability in your area.The colors shown should only be used as a guide.Final color selections should always be made from actual samples. � . �� •> > � i r r n n � rn n �inninn� r Calor Selection Chart A-312.17 Lhi ADMIXTURES for Color-Conditioned® Concrete Add strength and beauty to both vertical and horizontal construction projects with CHROMIX Admixtures.The 11 1 reliable, nonfading and C-31 Shadow Slate" 5238 Sunbaked Clay C-22 Coral Red C-26 Antique Cork consistent coloring admixtures for cast-in-place and precast concrete have been proven to stand the test of time. II Available in two convenient IS ' forms: L ■ CHROMIX P(powdered) ■ CHROMIX L(liquid)available through selected ready-mix K-210-8 Landmarks Gray 6063 Winter Beige C-32 Quarry Red 5234 Summer Beige suppliers and distributors in buckets and totes - The most popular colors are shown on this color chart. More than 600 color formulations are readily available,in addition to our custom matching service. '6 I Beauty,Durability and Value 1266 Cool Gray 0288 Autumn Beige 5059 Sorrento Red 5130 Spring Beige CHROMIX Admixtures provide streak-free color-conditioning and performance characteristics superior to concrete colored 4 with raw pigments. LITHOCHROMEO Colorwax"and COLORCURE0 Concrete Sealer are available in matching colors. SCOFIELD°Texturetop®is C-14 French Gray C-20 Limestone C-27 Westwood Brown C-15 Coachella Sand also available in colors to approximate those shown. it I � Review Tech-Data Bulletins 1 and MSDS before use. i '? Visit www.scofield.com for the li } most current versions. C-24 Charcoal C-25 Sombrero Burl 1017 Barcelona Brown C-11 DesertSand f rii' t e 1 i C-34 Dark Gray C-12 Mosa Beige 1010 Brownstone C-21 Adobe Tan Shadow Slate is only available in CHROMIX P(powdered)form. Colors shown approximate the color of broom-finished concrete flatwork made with a medium-gray cement and cured m with LITHOCHROME Colorwax or COLORCURE Concrete Sealer in the matching color.Concrete not so cured will have SE LO. less brilliance. Concrete should be batched and placed in accordance with Tech-Data Bulletins. SYSTEMSConcrete color is altered by many factors,including cement and aggregate color,slump,finishing practices,and curing www.scotield.conl method.Using the contemplated materials and construction techniques,representative samples should be cast for approval,especially when exact color matching is important. L.M.Scofield Company 1 800 800 9900 ®LM.Seofold Company 2013—Alln,hr.reecrved.CHROMIX,COLORCURE,LRHOCHROLIE,SCOFIELD,O, FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY Cola,Condilionod,Colmwex,and Texlumlop ere Irademo,kx of L.M.acolield Company. SAGA. Hanover® Prest Pavers and Asphalt Block have been infused with clam shells to create the Chesapeake Collection.A range of coastal inspired colors is available, as well as multiple sizes and a variety of textures.The addition of recycled clam shells boosts the recycled content of. Percentage of recycled content is based on the recycled materials used and varies for each color, CHESAPEAKE • • P I REST"' PAVER COLORS . • TUDOR" FINISH Matrix#2988 Matrix#3009 Matrix#3370 Matrix #3371 Matrix#3372 Matrix#3373 Matrix#3374 Matrix#3375 t f '� yj M atrix#3376 Matrix#3377 Matrix#3378 Matrix#3379 ' CHESAPEAKE; COLLECTION ASPHALT BLOCK COLORS f � A80044 A80044 A80045 A80045 AA80046 A80046 A80047 A80047 Ground Finish Ground Tudor'° Ground Finish Ground Tudor- Ground Finish Ground Tudor- Ground Finish Ground Tudor1D Finish Finish Finish Finish PLEASE NOTE: Additional custom blending is available on special order I' 11 NN - IEI�®when quantities permit. The color photos shown were prepared withIt_II great concern for accuracy.However, it is suggested that actual samples be requested before specifying. Due to the natural variance of the raw materials used,products can be expected to differ slightly from sample to � actual product.It is recommended that the products be cleaned after the Ar e h i t e e t u r a l Products installation is finished.Contact our representatives for product suggestions. 5000 Hanover Road,Hanover,PA 17331 X1971-2016 Hanovem Architectural Products 717.637.0500 • fax 717.637.7145 wvvw.hanoverpavers.com TYPE P3,P4 and P4D ALN445 - Towne Commons®LED I TYPE ry c - • Energy Saving LED technology • Surge protection included Cast aluminum struts • Refiable efficient operation • Wide variety of custom mounting options • DLC pending • Type 2,3,4,5 distributions including post-top,wall mount or pole . Available in 3000K,4000K and 6000K • 0-10V dimmingread mount arm Y Powder chat finish in 13 standard • LifeShield®protection system IP66 construction of optical system colors with polymer sealer ALN445 1.LUMINAIRE 2.DISTRIBUTION 3.COLOR TEMP 4.DRIVER 5.COLOR 6.OPTIONS 7.CONTROL 8.MOUNTING ALN 445 1. LUMINAIRE 7. CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS ARM OR POST TOP MOUNT PCA-C(Conlemporaryphoucell adapter,notfor Wall Mounp HOUSING ALN445 adittooal hotocelladater,not for Wall Mount) Luminaire shall be cast A356 alloy aluminum,free R P 0 TOP MOUNTED ARMOR PENDANT MOUNT PCA-T ALN 4451) SCP(Sensor Control Programmable)pole accessory is of any porosity or cosmetic fillers.Castings shall available to provide occupancy detection for outdoor be of uniform wall thickness,minimum.188 inch applications meeting California Title 24.For complete with no warping or mold shifting. 2. DISTRIBUTION Spec sheet and ordering information,visit www.aal net/ The top cap shall hinge open by loosening two Y2(Type 2) products/sensor control programmable/ captive fasteners,The top shall seal the lamp EY3(Type3) TYPE P3 8. MOUNTING cos tensmicartshallent be one-piece clear continuous silicone l grade. The fens shell heone-piece clear optical grade Y4(TYPO 4) TYPE P4 and PQ WALL MOUNT acrylic with a one-piece memory retentive silicone Y5(Type 5) ALN445 gasket on top and bottom.The LED and driver WMA1M WMA1L WMA3 WMA35U assembly shall be serviceable by backing out WMA36U WMA55 WMA56 WMA57 three thumb screws to allow for the light engine to 3. COLOR TEMPERATURE WMA7 WMA9U WMA22U be lifted out.Quick disconnects shall be used for [3211(Warm White,3000Kou(oupLN44 D all electrical connections. 321(Neutral White,4000Koutput) Wl WMA2L WMA37 WMA38 Ah internal and external hardware shall be 32LEDSK(Bright White,5000KoutPut) WMA39 WMA4 WNI WMA8 stainless steel. WMA91) WMA10 WMA11 WMA12 OPTICAL MODULE 4. DRIVER(120 thm 277 volt) WMAi6 WMA17 WMA18 WMA220 The optical assembly shall be completely sealed L700(700mA drive current, 75 watts) POLE MOUNT(4'01 ors"O D side mount) with a one piece injection molded silicone gasket ALN445 to prevent dust,insect or moisture contamination. TRA1 M TRA3 l] TRA55 The optical array shall consist of high brightness S. COLOR TRA56(4"only) TRA57 TRA59U SLABU light emitting diodes mounted to a printed metal 3LA22U circuit board with precision injection molded WH Arctic While VBU e Blue Al optically clear lenses discretely coupled to BL Black CRT Cotten TRA2M TRA2L SLA3(4"only) each individual diode.The printed circuit board BLT Matte Black MAL Matte Aluminum SLABD SLA22D assembly shall have a uniform conformal coating DB Dark Bronze MG Medium Grey with the exception of the optical output lens at DGN Dark Green AGN Antique Green POLE MOUNT(Ton Mount Arm) each diode and be mechanically fastened to an TT Titanium LG Lightfuey ALN445 anodized die-cast aluminum heat sink.Standard WDB Weathered Bronze RAL Premium Color SLA1 SLA)-2 color temperatures shall be 3000K,4000K and MDB Bronze Metallic CUSTOM"Contact Factary ALL5D 5000K. TRA4 TRA7 TRA7-2 TRAB TRA9 TRA9-2 SLA4 Si 6. OPTIONS SLAT SLA7-2 SLAB SLA9-2 CHM(Glass chimney with polished brass holder) SLA10 SLA10-2t SLA16 SLA16-2 CND(3-lamp candelabra withpobshedbrzss holder,lampsincluded. SLA17 SLA17-2 SLA18 SLA18-2 Fmdoonalive use only) PIER MOUNT LDL(Lightly diffused lens) PM1 PM2 PM3 SBL(Sandblastdiffusedlens) EHSS-L Houseside shieldforuse with clear lens only,consists oflhree field installeddarmus attached la the inside of the lens.Installing three panels blocks 1800 of the lens) - MAT(Mast arm adapter slips over a 23/8'160mm O.D.pipe and is secured with 4 stainless steel setscrews For-ALN4450 only) PMS(Pendant mount with 48'11220mm stem and canopy with swivel. For ALN445D only.) PMC(Pendant kit includes canopy and 48"/1220mm of brass chain See next page painted the fixture color.ForALN4450 only) PT4(Post lop adaptor fora 4%100mm 0.0i pole) JOB TYPE NOTES ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING archltecturai 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 areaGghting P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net Copyright m 2012 1 Rev 2.15 I I ALN445 - Towne Commons®LED I TYPE ELECTRICAL DIMENSIONS All Luminaires shall accept 120thru 277 volt input and have integral surge protection.Drivers shall be LLL recognized and have a 0-1 Ov dimming interface with a dimming range 17 of 10-100%.Approved dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV.(Note:not compatible with current sourcing dimmers).Consult factory for current list of known compatible dimming systems,LifeShiedTM shall ALN445 ALN4450 be provided with all configurations for added protection in HEIGHT:36"/915mm HEIGHT:31"/800mm extreme temperature environments(-30°C to 60°C).The LENGTH:22"/560mm LENGTH:22"/560mm electrical assembly shall be mounted to a serviceable tray. WIDTH:22"/560mm WIDTH:22"/560mm The surge protector shall be U.L.recognized and have a WEIGHT:52 les. WEIGHT:48 Ids. surge current rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry EPA:3.45 EPA:3.45 standard B/2OuSec wave with a clamping voltage of 320V ALN446 ALN445D and surge rating of 372J.The surge protector case shall be a high-temperature,flame resistant plastic enclosure. The electrical assembly shall be installed and prewired in PERFORMANCE DATA(32 LEDS,700 MA DRIVE CURRENT,75 WATTS) the fixture. TYPE LENS 5K 4K 3K CONTROLS LUMENS LPW B U G LUMENS LPW B U G LUMENS LPW B U G Y2 5427 72 2 3 3 5156 69 2 2 3 4016 54 1 3 2 SCP shall have an integral surge protection device Y3 5237 70 2 3 2 4975 Is 2 3 2 3875 52 1 3 2 with a currentt rating of 10,000 Amps using the V4 CLEAR 5736 76 1 3 3 5449 73 1 3 3 4245 57 1 3 2 industry standard 8/20uSec wave and sure rating Y5 5183 69 3 3 3f_,%45 66 3 3 2 3809 51 2 3 2 of 372J V2 5160 69 2 4F44327 65 2 4 3 3818 51 1 3 3 V3 4964 66 1 463 1 4 3 3674 49 1 3 3 Sensor not intended for use with additional photo- V4 LDL 5449 73 1 469 1 4 3 4032 54 1 4 3 control,wireless control or dimming systems. Y5 4901 65 2 462 2 4 3 3610 48 2 3 3 SERVICING V2 4729 63 2 460 1 4 3 3499 47 1 4 3 The top of the fixture shall hinge open for relamping by V9 SBL 4554 61 1 458 14 3 3370 45 1 4 2 loosening two stainless steel fasteners. Y4 5004 67 1 4V5 4499 60 2 457 2 4 3 3310 44 7 4 2 MOUNTING Post top mounting:The fixture shall slip over a 5'/127mm ALN445-Y3-32LED-SK-700 WATTAGE:75 LUMEN OUTPUT:5237 EFFICACY:701 O.O.pole or tenon and be secured to the pole with three(or six)stainless steel set screws. B2 U3 G2 UPLIGHT 0% Arm or wall mounting:The fixture LIGHT LUMEN DOWNLIGHT 100% re shall be attached to the - cast arm with three stainless steel bolts and a silicone FL 301 2.4% 124.3 gasket. FM 60° 34.5% 1804.4 FH Be- 29.1% 1523.6 FINISH FVH 90° 3.1% 163.2 Fixture finish shall consist of a five stage pretreatment BACK LIGHT regimen with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off and BL 30' 1.7% 90.7 top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder BM 60° 12.1% 631.5 coat finish.The finish shall meet the AAMA 2604-02 BH 80° 11.1% 582.8 -t performance specification which includes passing a 3000 BVH g0° 2.5% 133.1 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance. UPLIGHT CERTIFICATION UL 100° 1.0% 54.3 UH 180° 2.5% 129.2 Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for outdoor,wet location 14'MOUNTING HEIGHT use,conforming to the UL 1598 and Canadian CSA 22.2 no.250 standard.IP54. ALN445-Y5-32LED-SK-700 WATTAGE:74.9 LUMEN OUTPUT:5183 EFFICACY:691 WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE B3 U3 G3 Download: FORWARD LIGHT LUMEN UPLIGHT O% Intto://www.hubbelll'ghtino om/r o rcs/warranty/ DOWNLIGHT 100% FL 30° 1.9% 96.7 FM 60° 16.2% 839.4 ML reserves the right to change producfspecitia)tion wi(hoofnotice. FH 60° 25.8% 1336.3 - FVH 90' 4.4% 228.3 BACK LIGHT BL 30° 1.9% 96.7 •� BM 60° 16.2% 839.4 PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE BH 80' 25.8% 1336.3 AMBIENT 0 25,000 50,000 'TM-21-11 100,000 PROJECTED BVH 90° 4.4% 228.3 TEMP, 60,000 L70(HRS UPLIGHT 77-F 100% 95% 93% 92% 89% >60,000 UL 100° 1.6% 82.2 A'MOUNTING HEIGHT 77°F UH 180° 1.9% 99.0 9 40°C/ 100% 94% 91% 90% 85% >60,000 04°F IES tiles can be lound at www aal net ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING architectural 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 arealighting P626.968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I www.aal.net Copyright©2012 1 Rev 2.15 1 2 1 TYPE: W4L and WK ALN440 — Towne Commons®LE® I TYPE ,.. • Energy Saving LED technology • Wide variety of custom mounting options • Available in 3000K,4000K and SOOOK • Reliable efficient operation including post-top,wall mount or pole Powder coat finish in 13 standard • Type 2,3,4,5 distributions mount arm colors with polymer sealer • 0-10V dimming ready IP66 construction of optical system • LifeShield°protection system • Cast aluminum struts • Surge protection included • DLC pending ALN440 1.LUMINAIRE 2.DISTRIBUTION 3.COLOR TEMP 4.DRIVER 5.COLOR 6.OPTIONS 7.CONTROL S.MOUNTING ALN 440 1, LUMINAIRE 7. CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS . PCA-C(Contemporary photocell adapter,not for Wall HOUSING ALN 440 Mount) Luminaire shall be cast A356 alloy aluminum,free Mount TOP MOUNTED ARM OR PENDANT MOUNT PC (Traditional photocell adapter,not for Wall of any porosity or cosmetic tillers.Castings shall ALN 4400 ) be of uniform wall thickness,minimum.188 inch SCP(Sensor Control Programmable)pole accessory is with no warping or mold shifting. available to provide occupancy detection for outdoor 2. DISTRIBUTION The top cap shall hinge open by loosening two Y2(Type 2 applications meeting California Title 24.For complete captive fasteners.The top shall seal the lamp YP ) spec sheet and ordering information,visit wwwaaL net/ compartment with a continuous silicone gasket. _Y3 fTvoe 31 DrOducts1sensor control g m l? / The lens shall be one-piece clear optical grade Y4(Type 4) W4L only acrylic with a one-piece memory retentive silicone Y5(Type 5) WK Only gasket on top and bottom.The LED and driver assembly shall be serviceable by backing out 8. MOUNTING three thumb screws to allow for the light engine to 3. COLOR TEMPERATURE WALL MOUNT be lifted out.Quick disconnects shall be used for 32LED-3K(Warm White,3000K output) ALN440 all electrical connections. 32 - -4 eutrel Re,4 00 output WMA1M WMA1L WMA3 WMA35U All internal and external hardware shall be 32LED-5K(Bright White,5000K output) CMA36U WMA55 WMA56 WMA57 stainless steel. WMA7 WMA9U WMA22U OPTICAL MODULE 4. DRIVER 1120 thru 277 volt) ALN440D The optical assembly shall be completely sealed WMA2M WMA2L WMA37 WMA38 with a one piece injection molded silicone gasket C 700(700mA drive current, 75 watts) WMA39 WMA4 WMA6 WMA8 to prevent dust,insect or moisture contamination. WMA90 WMA10 WMA11 WMA12 The optical array shall consist of high brightness WMA16 WMA17 WMA18 WMA22D light emitting diodes mounted to a printed metal S. COLOR circuit board with precision injection molded VBU Verde Blue POLE MOUNT optically clear lenses discretely coupled to C SL Black CRT CorterPost Top,Mount: each individual diode.The printed circuit board (Standard) assembly shall have a uniform conformal coating —BC1'—hhafle'Bha MAL Molle Aluminum The fixture shall slip over a 4"/100mm 0.0,pole or with the exception of the optical output lens at DB DarkBrouze MG Medium Grey tenon and be secured to the pole with three(or six) each diode and be mechanically fastened to an DGN Dark Green AGN Antique Green stainless steel anodized die-cast aluminum heat sink.Standard p leSld M Oor 5"OD 'dutTT Titanium LG Light Grey t color temperatures shall be 3000K,4000K and WDB Weathered Bronze RAL Premium Color ALN440 5000K. MOB Bronze Metallic CUSTOM"Contact Factory TRA1M TRA3 TRA5U TRA55 ELECTRICAL TRA56(4"only) TRA57 TRA59U SLA8U All Luminaires shall accept 120 thru 277 volt 6. OPTIONS SLA22U input and have integral surge protection.Drivers CHM(Glass chimney with polished brass holder) ALN440D shall be U.L recognized and have a 0-10v CND(3-lamp candelabra with polished brass holder, TRA2M TRA21_ SLA3(4"only)SLA8D dimming interface with a dimming range of 10- lamps included.For decorative use only.) SLA22D 100%.Approved dimmers include Lutron Diva Pole Top Mount Arm AVTV,Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV.(Note: LDL(Lightly diffused lens) not compatible with current sourcing dimmers). SBL(Sandblast diffused lens) ALN440 Consult factory for current list of known compatible HSS-L(House side shield,consists of three field installed SLA1 SLA1-2 dimming systems.LifeShieldr"shall be provided panels attached to the inside of the lens.Installing ALN440D with all configurations for added protection in three panels blocks 1800 of the lens) TRA4 TRA7 TRA7.2 TRA8 extreme temperature environments(-30°C to MAT(Mast arm adapter slips over 23/8"/60mm O.D. TRA9 TRA9-2 SLA4 SLA4-2 60°C).The electrical assembly shall be mounted pipe and is secured with 4 stainless steel set screws. SLAT SLA7-2 SLA9 SLA9-2 to a serviceable tray.The surge protector shall ForALN4400 only.) SLA10 SLA10-2 SLA16 SLA16-2 be U.L.recognized and have a sur go current PMS(Pendant mount with 48"/1220mm stem and SLA17 SLA17-2 SLA18 SLA18-2 rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard canopy with swivel.For ALN440D only.) PIER MOUNT See next page PMC(Pendant kit includes canopy and 48"/1220mm o1 PM1 PM2 PM3 brass chain painted the fixture color.ForALN440D V's't ww I t for Ams Poles&Accessories JOB onty,) Specification Guide PTS(Post top adapror for a 5%127mm O.D.pole) TYPE ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING NOTES alY:hkeetuml 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 arealighting P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net Copyright 0 2012 1 Rev 2.15 1 1 1 ALN440 - Towne Commons®LED TYPE 8/20u5ec wave with a clamping voltage of 320V and DIMENSIONS surge rating of 3721 The surge protector case shall be a high-temperature,flame resistant plastic enclosure.The electrical assembly shall be installed and prewired in the fixture, _17 NN ALN440 ALN440D •' c�::iwi?%S_:'w�uw,UZI HEIGHT:31'/790mm HEIGHT:2 8m EG18' m LENGTH1 '/460mm WIDTH: 60mm :8"/460mm rrwavwna,,., WEIGHT:40 lbs. WEIGHT:35 lbs. EPA:2.80 EPA:2.58 CONTROLS ALN440 ALN440D SCP shall have an integral surge protection device with a Curfentt rating of 10,000 Amps using the PERFORMANCE DATA(32 LEDS,700 MA DRIVE CURRENT,78 WATTS) industry standard 8/20uSec wave and sure rating TYPE LENS 5K 4K 3K of 372J LUMENS I LPW I B I U -6 LUMENS LPW B U G LUMENS LPW B U G Sensor not intended for Use with additional photo- Y2 5427 72 2 3 3 5158 69 2 2 3 MEN 54 1 3 2 control,wireless control or dimming systems. Ya 5237 70 2 3 2 4975 68 2 -3 -2 3875 52 1 3 2 SERVICING Y4 CLEAR 5736 76 1 3 3 5449 73 1 3 3 4245 57 1 3 2 The top of the fixture shall hinge open for relamping by Y5 5183 69 3 3 3 4945 66 1 3 1 3 2 3809 51 2 3 2 loosening two stainless steel fasteners. Y2 5160 69 2 4 3 4902 65 2 1 4 3 3818 51 1 3 3 Y3 LDL 4964 66 1 4 3 4716 63 1 4 3 3674 49 1 3 3 MOUNTING Y4 5449 73 1 4 3 5176 68 1 4 3 4032 54 14 3 Post top mounting:The fixture shall slip over a 4"/100mm V5 4901 65 2 4 3 4665 62 2 4 3 3610 48 2 3 3 O.D.pole or tenon and be secured to the pole with three(or Y2 4728 63 2 4 3 4492 60 1 4 3 3499 47 1 4 3 six)stainless steel set screws. Y3 SBL 4554 61 1 4.3 4327 58 1 4 3 3370 45 1 4 2 Y4 5004 67 1 4 3 4754 83 1 4 3 3703 49 1 4 3 Arm or wall mounting:The fixture shall be attached to the Y5 4499 60 2 4 3 4292 57 2 4 3 3310 44 1 4 2 cast arm with three stainless steel bolts and a silicone gasket FINISH ALN440-Y3.32LED-5K-700 WATTAGE:75 LUMEN OUTPUT:5237 EFFICACY:70 Lm/W Fixture finish shall consist of afive stage pretreatment B2 U3 G2 UPLIGHT O% regimen with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off and FORWARD LIGHT LUMEN ` ' +!+ DOWNLIGHT 100% top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder FL 30° 2.4% 124,3 i. coat finish.The finish shall meet the AAMA 2604-02 FM 601' 34.5% 1804.4 performance specification Which includes passing a 3000 FH 80° 29.1% 1523.6 t hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance. FVH 90° 3.1% 163.2 CERTIFICATION BACK LIGHT Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for outdoor,wet location BL 30° 1.7% 90.7 use,conforming to the UL 1598 and Canadian CSA 22.2 BM 60° 12.1% 631.5 no.250 standard.IP54. BH 800 11.1% 582.8 BVH 900 2.5% 133.1 WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE UPLIGHT } Download: UL 100° 1.0% 54.3 {- htto://www.huhhellliq ting com/race rrec/ a a 1 d UH 180° 2.5% 129.2 f 1 14'MOUNTING HEIGHT ALN440-Y6-32LED-SK-700 WATTAGE:74.9 LUMEN OUTPUT:5183 EFFICACY:69 Lm/W B3 U3 G3 UPLIGHT 0% FORWARD LIGHT LUMEN I DOWNUGHT100% FL 30° 1.9% 96.7 �. .. �� FM 60° 16.2% 839.4 - - `i FH 80° 25.8% 1336.3 FVH 90" 4.4% 228.3 BACK LIGHT AAL resenas the right to changeproducfspecilicaliow without notice. BL 30° 1.9% 96,7 BM 60' 16.2% 839.4 - PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE BH 80, 25.8% 1336.3 AMBIENT 0 25,000 50,000 'TM-71-11 100,000 PROTECTED BVH 90° 4.4% 228.3 TEMP. 'Ci 60,000 1-70 MRS) UPLIGHT 5 100% 95% 93% 92% 89% >60,000 UL 100° 1,6% 82.2 UH 180° .9% 99.0 14'MOUNTING HEIGHT 1 4WC/ 100% 94% 91% 90% 85% >60,000 104°F IES files can be found at www.aal.net 1--o"i ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING architectural 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry 1 CA 91745 arealighting P626.968.5666 1 F626.369.2695 1 wWw.aal.net Copyright m 2012 1 Rev 2.15 1 2 1 Wall mount and post mount arms Period Arms DATE TYPE PAGE 17 OF 32 TRA 5U LBS. EPA: .62 The arm shall be one piece cast aluminum construction. The arm shall be 19 in prewired with a quick connector for easy installation. ice— 483 mm —� The arm shall have a cast aluminum fitter welded to the top of the arm(s) for attaching the fixture. The fixture shall be mounted with three stainless steel bolts through the top of the arm fitter Into the fixture. The attachment point shall have a silicone pad for sealing the fixture to arm 181n connection. 457mm The arm shall bolt to a 4"1100mM diameter pole. Note: Fixture type and mounting orientation will determine size of arm tail. TRA 6U WEIGHT: 9 LBS. EPA: .62 The arm shall be one piece cast aluminum construction.The arm shall be prewired with a quick connector for easy installation. is in �— 483 mm —� The arm shall have a cast aluminum fitter welded to the top of the arm(s) for attaching the fixture. The fixture shall be mounted with three stainless steel bolts through the top of the arm fitter into the fixture. The attachment point shall have a silicone pad for sealing the fixture to arm connection. 15 in 381 mm The arm shall bolt to a 4"/100mm diameter pole. Note: Fixture type and mounting orientation will determine size of arm tail. TRA 6D WEIGHT: 9 LBS. EPA: .62 The arm shall be of one piece unitized aluminum construction, fully welded and assembled.The slip fitter shall be cast aluminum with an internal wireway and pole stop.The arm shall be prewired with a quick connector for easy installation. \ The arms shall have a cast aluminum fitter welded to the top of the arm(s) for attaching the fixture. The fixture shall be mounted with three stainless r steel bolts through the top of the arm fitter into the fixture. The attachment point shall have a silicone pad for sealing the fixture to arm connection. =— The arm shall bolt to a 4"1100MM diameter pole. T-- 1B" Note: Fixture and mounting orientation will determine size of arm tail. SOLD TO PO# JOB NAME APPROVALS Architectural Area Lighting 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net Design patents, Copyright©2010 Rev 01/2012 Wall Mount Arms DATE TYPE PAGE 24 OF 32 WMA 35D WEIGHT: 12 LBS. The arm shall be one piece cast aluminum construction. The arm shall be prewired with a quick connector for easy installation.The back plate 14 in shall be one piece cast aluminum. 35smm The arm shall have a cast aluminum fitter welded to the top of the arm(s) for attaching the fixture. The fixture shall be mounted with 6.62 in three stainless steel bolts through the top of the arm fitter into the 755mm o fixture. The attachment point shall have a silicone pad for sealing the fixture to arm connection. i�rt Mounting hardware and J-box by others. 508 201n mm Note: Back plate is welded to the arm. FWMA 36U `WEfGTT—T2ZBS. 14 in The arm shall be one piece cast aluminum construction.The arm 356mm shall be prewired with a quick connector for easy installation.The back plate shall be one piece cast aluminum. The arm shall have a cast aluminum fitter welded to the top 5.52 in O of the arm(s) for attaching the fixture. The fixture shall be lsemm mounted with three stainless steel bolts through the top of the arm fitter into the fixture. The attachment point shall have a f7 silicone pad for sealing the fixture to arm connection. I� zo In Mounting hardware and J-box by others. 508 mm Note: Back plate is welded to the arm. WMA 36D WEIGHT: 12 LBS. The arm shall be one piece cast aluminum construction.The arm shall be 4 i❑ 1 prewired with a quick connector for easy installation.The back plate shall 31smm 20 in be one piece cast aluminum. sos mm The arm shall have a cast aluminum fitter welded to the top of the arm(s)for attaching the fixture. The fixture shall be mounted with three stainless steel bolts through the top of the arm fitter into the 5'62'n o fixture. The attachment point shall have a silicone pad for sealing the 158mm fixture to arm connection. Mounting hardware and J-box by others. Note: Back plate is welded to the arm. SOLD TO PO# JOB NAME APPROVALS Architectural Area Lighting 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net Design patents, Copyright©2010 Rev 01/2012 PR4 - Aluminum Pole I TYPE 4"ROUND(RD)POLE 1,BASE 2.POLE 3.OAH 4.COLOR eTypo P3 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE EPA(MPH) PR4 1.BASE 2.POLE 3,OAH SHAFT WT 85 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 SPECIFICATIONS PR4 4R8-125 8'(2.4m) 4"RDx.125" 22 12.3 10.9 8.7 7 5.7 4.6 4.1 3.6 Base shall be cast aluminum#356 alloy,free of PR4 4R 10-125 10'(3.1 mJ 4"RD x.125" 25 9.1 8 6.3 4,9 4.0 3.3 2.8 2.4 any porosity,foreign materials,or cosmetic fillers. Rd 4R12425-T2 4'RD x.125" 28 6.9 6 4.5 3.4 2.6 2.1 1.8 1,5 Base casting shall be heat treated to a condition,and o'uniform wall thickness,,with no PR4 41`114-125 14'(4.3m) 4"RD x.125' 32 5.2 4.4 3.2 2.3 1,5 1.2 1 0.8 warping or mold shifting. PR4 4R16-125 16'(4.9m) 4"RD x.125" 35 3.9 3.2 2.1 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 WARNINGS P114 4RRa9R a' 4"RDx.226" 32 21.5 19.2 15.5 12.7 10,6 9.0 7.7 6.7 Caution must be exercised in the selection of r e design wind speed when the pole is to be L PR4 41`110-226 10'(3.1 m) 4"RD x.226" 38 16.5 14.6 11,7 9.4 7.8 6.6 5.6 4.8 installed in a special wind region(as indicated by PR4 4R12-226 12'(3.7m 4"RD x.226" 44 13.0 11.4 9 7.2 5.8 4.9 4.1 3.5 the wind map)or in an area where wind speed is unpredictable. PR4 4R14-226 14'(4.3m) 4"RDx.226" 61 10.3 9.1 7 5.4 4.3 3.6 3 2.5 AAL recommends consulting a local engineer PR4 4R16-226 16'(4.9m) 4"RD x.226" 57 8.3 7.2 5.4 4.1 3.1 2.5 2.1 1.8 when the pole is to be installed in an area that PR4 4R18-226 18'(5.5m) 4"RD x.226" 63 6.6 5.6 4.1 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.3 1 may be subject to extrema weather and exposure P94 4R20-226 20'(6.2m) "RD x.226" 70 5.1 4.3 3.0 1.9 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 Poles installed on structures such as buildings and bridges may be subjected to vibration, Note.Overall height is measured to top o/pole. Type PQ only oscillations,and other fatigue effects which are not covered by the AAL warranty. The use of banners or other appendages can severely affect the loading of a pole. No banner 2. COLOR or other appendage should be attached to an AAL pole unless approved by AAL. Arci White VBU Verde Blue Coordinate Pole Height with If the products are to be used on an existing BL Black CRT Cortes footing to result in 12 foot foundation or on other structures,the customer BLT Matte Black MAL Mzh6Alumlom uassumes all responsibility for the structural - De Dark Brow MG Medium Grey mounting height. integrity of the existing foundation,anchorage DGN Dark Green AGN Antique Green or structures and all the consequences arising TT Titanium LG Light Grey therefrom. WIDE Weathered Bronze RAL Premium Calor CAUTION MDB Bronze Metallic CUSTOM"ContacfFactory Poles should never be erected without the luminaire installed.Warranty is voided if the pole is erected without the luminaire.The warranty is voided if the pole is not grouted under the entire base after Installation. Anchor bolts shall be hot dip galvanized steel. Eight galvanized hex nuts and flet washers,and a bolt circle template shall be provided.Anchor bolt for poles are 3/4"x 24"x 3". CERTIFICATION Certified UL 1598 in accordance with Article 410 of ANSI/NFPA 70,National Electrical Code. JOB - TYPE ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING NOTES 16555 East Gale.Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 "" r P626,968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I www.eal.net Copyright m 2012 1 REV 6.15 1 1 1 PR4 - Aluminum Pole I TYPE 4"ROUND(RD)POLE DIMENSIONS 4PCtEQ OAN 3 X 5,5INCH REMFORCEO HAND HOLE All ANCHOR DOLT 120in 1aD u� PROJECTION 305m 451mm C6i B]5 in �— L �nI 1 GROUT UNDER CONCRETE FOOLING ENTIRE WE BY OTXERG ACCESS COVER 19 � J \ T'BOLTCIRCLE: 4 LOCATIONS 1 SO'APART \q` STREET SIDE r DIA. BOTTOM VIEW (INDICATES POLE IS I AY1NG DOWN WITH HANDHOLE FACING UPI ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 P626,968.5666 I F626.369.2695 1 w.vNaal.net Copyright I@ 2012 I REV 6.15 1 2 1 Base Covers TYPE Decorative Base Covers I 0II0f17 1.BASE 2,COLOR BC7 1.BASE I SPECIFICATIONS Two piece base covers are castaluminum that fit over standard 4"/100mm orr 5'7 5"I125mm round poles.Covers are attached with stainless steel hardware.Consult your AAL catalog for complete details on round poles. BC6-4(Fits over a 4'1100mm round pole) BC6-5(Fits over a 5%125mm round pole) WARNINGS Caution must be excercised in the selection of [BG5-4 Fils over 4%100mm round pale) 17'/430mm DIA x 13'/330mm high a design wind speed when the pole is to be -6C"S6- (Fits over a 5%125mm mundpcle) Two piece clamshell. installed in a special wind region(as indicated by 'AAL poles configured with BC6 shall have hand the wind map)or in an area where wind speed is 14'1350mm DIA x 24'/610mm high, hole location at 16". unpredictable. Two piece clamshell. AAL recommends consulting a local engineer when the pole is to be installed in an area that O may be subject to extreme weather and exposure Poles installed on structures such as buildings and bridges may t e rsubjectedfatigue to cswhich vibration, J oscillations,and other fatigue effects which are not covered by the AAL warranty. The use of banners or other appendages can severley affect the loading of a pole. No banner or other appendage should be attached to an AAL pole unless approved by AAL. If the products are to be used on an existing BC7-4(Fits overa 4%100mm round pole) foundation or on other structures,the customer BC7-5(Fits overs 5%125mm roundpole) BCS-4(Fits overa4%100mm round pole) assumes all responsibility for the structural Integrity of the existing foundation,anchorage 16'/460mm DIA x 30"/760mm high. 12'/305mm DIA x 36/915mm high, or structures and all the consequences arising Two piece clamshell with a one piece upper collar. Two piece clamshell, therefrom. ACSCR(Fits over a 411100mm round pole) ACBCS(%Is over a 47100mm square pole) 147356mm DIA x 18'1460mm high 14'/356mm square x 18"/457mm high. One piece cover with a two piece upper collar. One piece cover with a two piece upper collar. 2. COLOR WH Arctic White VBU Verde Blue BL Black CRT Cotten BLT Matte Black MAL Matte Aluminum DB Dark Bronze MG Medium Grey DGN Dark Green AGN Antique Green TT Fitan;um LG Lfghl Grey WIDE WealheredBronze RAL Premium Calor JOB MOB Bronze Metallic CUSTOM"ConhctFactory TYPE NOTES ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry 1 CA 91745 P626.968.56661 F626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net Copyright m 2012 1 REV 6.12 I I I Y _ __•.. . . . . . fes ® / �:. � �,� e° n �G y �� `� s i (f f 4 4 t 1 o- t \` i � '. ~` I - t 331 A TrE GA'F, yrc Al %!;7/1 Z/) 71 w t - 6 s r i r / .` RECEIVED s CITY OFSALEMFEB 2 5 2016 PLANNINGBOARD - DEPT. OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEJ T rrn �r n r CITY OF SALEM E ;_ APPLICATION FORM CITY CLE-A ,-.!L_M H SITE PLAN REVIEW Location of Property: 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue; 11 West Avenue Map & Lot: Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234 Owner: See attached consent letters Applicant: 331 Lafayette, LLC Address/PO Box: Address/PO Box: 75 Nanepashment Street City, State,Zip Code: City, State,Zip Code: Marblehead, MA 01945 Telephone: Telephone:617-927-9700 I. Project Description: The project consists of a three story mixed use commercial building with approximately 4,500 s.f. of retail space on the first floor and 19,388 s. . of Mices ace on the lirst and upper o s. n exlsl ng two family home an the site will be IUIIUVdtud and minain In its cunant un. ZoningDistrict(s): B-1, R-1, R-2 Square footage of parcel: 42,058 s.f. Gross Square footage of structure(s): 24,388 s.f. Square footage of footprint: 8,157 s.f. No. of dwelling units: 2 H. Submission Requirements: Application form and attached reports,statements, and narratives: Three(3)hard copies shall be brought by the applicant to the City Clerk to be"date stamped". The City Clerk will retain the original; the remaining two(2) copies shall be filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. Plans and drawings: Three(3)full-size (24"x 36") sets of all plans and drawings and nine (9)half- size (11"xl7") sets of all plans and drawing shall be filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. Electronic submission: One(1)electronic copy of all application materials, including the application form and attached reports, statements,and narratives, and all project plans and drawings, shall be filed in .pdfformat with the Planning Board by the applicant. A. Required Narrative: A brief narrative, as requested by the Planning Board addressing the site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: 1. Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow, circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting 5. Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area B. Environmental Impact Statement: in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. C. Required Plans and Drawings: A Site Plan stamped and dated by an architect,registered engineer,landscape architect, or other qualified professional, at a scale of 1"=40',(or as established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: 1. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction; 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas,loading areas, walkways, and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways; 4. Location and type of external lighting; 5. Location,type,dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening; 6. Location and dimensions of utilities, gas,telephone, electrical communication,water, drainage, sewer and other waste disposal; 7. Location of snow removal areas; 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds,brooks,streams,wetlands, and marshes; 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site, with two-foot contours; 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of all buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural style; III. Procedure: The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(35) days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit. The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor//in title to alleviate the effects of same. / 1rt� GL22/ Gam" L��� 4�eorOwner ignature o Applicant (attached cons' t letter is also acceptable) February 25, 2016 Date Date FEE PAID: Required Narrative/Environmental Impact Statement The property that is the subject of this Site Plan Review Application involves four separate parcels of land located at 331-335 Lafayette St., 5-7 West Ave and 11 West Ave. As part of the rehabilitation of these properties, all of the buildings will be demolished with the exception of the two family dwelling at 11 West Avenue which will be restored. A new three story mixed use commercial building will be constructed on the combined parcels, consisting of 4,500 s.£ retail space on the first floor and a total of 19,388 s.£ of office space on all three floors. The total footprint of the new building will be 8,157 s.f. A total of 72 parking spaces are provided for all of the uses on the site in compliance with the requirements of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance (the "Ordinance"). A breakdown of the parking by use is shown in the Parking Table on the Site Layout Plan (C-3). There are no separate loading facilities as most deliveries are expected to be at the rear of the building made by smaller trucks at off peak times. Traffic will enter the site through a one way entrance on Lafayette Street and leave through a one way exit on West Ave. The width of aisles throughout the parking area is in compliance with the requirements of the Ordinance. The proposed parking meets the minimum requirement of the Zoning Ordinance which will be a significant improvement over the existing condition which is significantly deficient(existing parking provided: 39 spaces; existing required parking based on use: 104 spaces). The applicant is working with the City's Engineering Department to participate in traffic mitigation measures that are already planned for the intersection at West and Lafayette. The site plans illustrate a proposed widening of West Ave to accommodate a new turning lane and a longer radius at the corner to improve the turning maneuver. The applicant has offered to provide an easement for the public access of the sidewalk and proposed intersection signal lights that have been proposed by the city. Since the new building is primarily comprised of office use,traffic on the weekends will be significantly reduced. The external lighting on the site will fully illuminate the parking areas and entrances to the building for safety purposes. The fixtures will be a dark sky, cut off variety designed to prevent spilling light upward or onto abutting properties. The location and description of the fixtures are shown of the Site Lighting Plan (SL-1). The site will be extensively landscaped with an emphasis on creating asubstantial buffer between the site and the abutting residential properties as required in the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Landscaped areas along the roadways and a public plaza on Lafayette Street will dramatically enhance the streetscape. The location of plant materials and the variety and size of the plants are shown in detail on the Planting Plan (L-1). All new utility connections to the site will be provided in the coordination with the City's Engineering Department. The details for all utilities are shown on the Grading,Drainage & Utility Plan (C-4). Existing utility services will be cut and capped at the main line or pipe. The elimination of several old sewer service connection points will eliminate sources of potential inflow and infiltration(UI) into the sanitary sewer system. Removal of UI from the sanitary sewer system reduces the load on the municipal wastewater treatment works. UI is common with older pipes as fittings, materials of construction and deterioration due to time and use often result in cracks and loose fittings that allow groundwater to infiltrate into the sanitary sewer system. The new sewer service will be installed with modem construction material (polyvinyl chloride and rubber) and will be airtight in accordance with current standards for construction. Another benefit of the demolition of the existing structures will be the removal of basement areas which are also common sources of potential UI from older connections from sump pumps, foundation drains and roof drains. The new building will be constructed on a slab. Modest snow storage areas capacity will be available on the site, primarily around the perimeter of the site in obvious push areas for snow plows. If additional storage is necessary during heavy snow seasons,the applicant will contract for the removal of snow from the site. Disposal of the snow will follow State and Local hauling and disposal regulations. There are generally no natural features present that require protection or enhancement. There are several trees which will be removed through development of the site. These trees vary in quality and health but appear to be the result of a lack of maintenance resulting in woody growth establishing over time. The trees offer minimal aesthetic, shading or environmental benefit. The enhancement to the site landscaping will include the planting of 15 new trees which will offset the loss of existing trees and enhance the site screening, aesthetics and shading of paved parking and pedestrian areas. Several of the trees are proposed along the Lafayette Street Frontage. The site landscaping plan will also include extensive shrub and perennial infill plantings between the trees. The site has no significant topographical variations. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the extent practicable. The new storm-water management system will be constructed as shown on the Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan (C-4). Additional information on the design methodology for the stormwater management system is included in a Drainage Letter and supporting documentation enclosed with this application. The design of the new building has evolved considerably as part of the public approval process. The applicant has taken input from neighbors and community groups and has incorporated it into the design of the building to ensure that it is compatible with the surrounding area. Materials and colors will be chosen to fit with the architecture of neighboring buildings and the height of the new structure in consistent with others in the area. October 9,2015 City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE:331 Lafayette Street,Salem, MA To Whom It may concern: The undersigned, being the owner of the above referenced property hereby consent to the filing of petitions/applications by Robert Burr and 331 Lafayette Street LLC with Boards and Commission of the City of Salem relating to the property's development after its acquisition by Robert Burr and 331 Lafayette LLC. Very Truly Yours, Lee Family Enterprises By: 4etober 2015 City of Salem 1201 Washington Stmt Salem,Mmaa-bmem;01970 Re:335 Lafayette Street,Salem,NWsachuseus To whom it may concern: The undersigned,being the owner of-the above referenced property,hereby consent to the filing of petitionslapplications by Robert Burr and 331 Lafayette Street LLC with Boards and Commissions of the City of Salem. Very truly yours, ioma5 Truong October�,2015 City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Re: 5-7 West Avenue, Salem,Massachusetts To whom it may concern: The undersigned,being the owner of the above referencedproperty,here to the fil' � by mg of petitionslapplications by Robert Burr and 331 Lafayette Street LLC with Boards and Commissions of the City of Salem very truly yours, C.P.T. T By. �Ne City of Salem MJ .UftkY 7rl'I G izo weshmetpn street rearm,massamuserts utytu The urtderslgned,being the owner of*.e above rnf..r„sa zhe Kling of Patftf o &m Sr o heremV k guar to and enr� i+P.licetlm■s 61`ao6art War and�g Strmbt il.0 uYfb 9earda and Commissions of the City of Salem Very truly VOOM Olen Prince 1 Id Wd0£:SO SIO? ZI 'AOry .ON XHd WOi:Li l I 1 The Morin-Cameron 1 c� Qo � pa oac� i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECEIVED . FEB 25 2016 1 DEPT. OF PLANNING 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LAND USE PLANNERS 1 447 Boston Street(U.S. Route 1), Topstield, MA 01983 978.887.8586 FAX 978.887.3480 Providing Professional Services Since 1978 1 1 1 i 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW i 331 LAFAYETTE STREET MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING i SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS February 2S, 2016 1 i SUBMITTED TO• CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD i 120 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MA 01970 i APPLICANT: i331 LAFAYETTE, LLC 75 NANEPASHEMET STREET iMARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 i i i 1 1 v CITY OF SALEM PLA MNG BOARD ' CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION FORM SITE PLAN REVIEW ' Location of Property: 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue; 11 West Avenue Map & Lot: Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234 ' Owner: See attached consent letters Applicant: 331 Lafayette, LLC Address/PO Box: Address/PO Box: 75 Nanepashment Street ' City, State,Zip Code: City,State,Zip Code: Marblehead, MA 01945 Telephone: Telephone:617-927-9700 ' I. Proiect Description: The project consists of a three story mixed use commercial building with approximately 4,500 s.f.of retall space n the first Iloor and 19,388 s. . Or 0-Ince space on me first,6ndupper oors. exisimg two family noine un the bite will be miumted and lemelin in lN carlent Us". Zoning District(s): B-1 R-1,R-2 Square footage of parcel: 42,058 s.f. Gross Square footage of structure(s): 24,388 s.f. Square footage of footprint: 8,157 s.f. No. of dwelling units: 2 ' II. Submission Requirements: Application form and attached reports,statements,and narratives: Three(3)hard copies shall be ' brought by the applicant to the City Clerk to be"date stamped". The City Clerk will retain the original; the remaining two(2)copies shall be filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. Plans and drawings: Three(3)full-size(24"x 36")sets of all plans and drawings and nine(9)half- size(I l"x 1T)sets of all plans and drawing shall be filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. ' Electronic submission: One(1)electronic copy of all application materials,including the application form and attached reports,statements,and narratives,and all project plans and drawings,shall be filed in,pdfformat with the Planning Board by the applicant. ' A. Required'Narrative: A brief narrative,as requested by the Planning Board addressing the site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the follow lug defined categories: ' 1. Building 1 Parking and loading 3. 'Traffic flow,circulation and traffic impact ' 4 External lighting 5: Landscaping and screening ' 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal ' 8. -Natural featu es and their protection and enhancement ' 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area 1 B. Environmental Impact Statement: in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. ' C. Required Plans and Drawings: A Site Plan stamped and dated by an architect,registered engineer,landscape architect,or other qualified professional,at a scale of i"=10',(or as established by Planning Board)including all requirements as set forth in IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: ' 1. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction; 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas,loading areas,walkways,and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways; 4. Location and type of external lighting; t 5. Location,type,dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening; 6. Location and dimensions of utilities, gas,telephone,electrical communication,water, ' drainage,sewer and other waste disposal; 7. Location of snow removal areas; 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds,brooks,streams,wetlands, ' and marshes; 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site,with two-foot contours; ' 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of all buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural style; III. Procedure: ' The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, ' investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(3 5)days have elapsed after distribution of such application ' without a submission of a report.The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports,in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special ' permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special:pemnit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry ofDeeds,of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the ' petitioner or his successor in title to alleviate the effects of same. ' ignature , Applicant re o dertattached. tter isalso acceptable) February 25, 2016 ' Date Datti FEF PAID: 1 Required Narrative/Environmental Impact Statement The property that is the subject of this Site Plan Review Application involves four separate parcels of land located at 331-335 Lafayette St., 5-7 West Ave and 11 West Ave. As part of the rehabilitation of these properties, all of the buildings will be demolished with the exception of ' the two family dwelling at I 1 West Avenue which will be restored.A new three story mixed use commercial building will be constructed on the combined parcels, consisting of 4,500 s.f. retail space on the first floor and a total of 19,388 s.f. of office space on all three floors. The total ' footprint of the new building will be 8,157 s.f. A total of 72 parking spaces are provided for all of the uses on the site in compliance with the ' requirements of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance (the "Ordinance").A breakdown of the parking by use is shown in the Parking Table on the Site Layout Plan (C-3). There are no separate loading facilities as most deliveries are expected to be at the rear of the building made ' by smaller trucks at off peak times. Traffic will enter the site through a one way entrance on Lafayette Street and leave through a one ' way exit on West Ave. The width of aisles throughout the parking area is in compliance with the requirements of the Ordinance. The proposed parking meets the minimum requirement of the Zoning Ordinance which will be a significant improvement over the existing condition which is ' significantly deficient(existing parking provided: 39 spaces; existing required parking based on use: 104 spaces). The applicant is working with the City's Engineering Department to participate in traffic mitigation measures that are already planned for the intersection at West and ' Lafayette. The site plans illustrate a proposed widening of West Ave to accommodate a new turning lane and a longer radius at the corner to improve the turning maneuver. The applicant has offered to provide an easement for the public access of the sidewalk and proposed intersection signal lights that have been proposed by the city. Since the new building is primarily comprised of office use,traffic on the weekends will be significantly reduced. ' The external lighting on the site will fully illuminate the parking areas and entrances to the building for safety purposes. The fixtures will be a dark sky, cut off variety designed to prevent spilling light upward or onto abutting properties. The location and description of the fixtures are ' shown of the Site Lighting Plan (SL-1). The site will be extensively landscaped with an emphasis on creating a substantial buffer ' between the site and the abutting residential properties as required in the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Landscaped areas along the roadways and a public plaza on Lafayette Street will dramatically enhance the streetscape.The location of plant materials and the variety and size ' of the plants are shown in detail on the Planting Plan(L-1). All new utility connections to the site will be provided in the coordination with the City's ' Engineering Department. The details for all utilities are shown on the Grading,Drainage & Utility Plan(C-4). Existing utility services will be cut and capped at the main line or pipe. The 1 1 ' elimination of several old sewer service connection points will eliminate sources of potential inflow and infiltration (1/1) into the sanitary sewer system. Removal of 1/I from the sanitary ' sewer system reduces the load on the municipal wastewater treatment works. III is common with older pipes as fittings, materials of construction and deterioration due to time and use often result in cracks and loose fittings that allow groundwater to infiltrate into the sanitary sewer system. The new sewer service will be installed with modem construction material (polyvinyl chloride and rubber) and will be airtight in accordance with current standards for construction. Another benefit of the demolition of the existing structures will be the removal of basement areas which ' are also common sources of potential I/1 from older connections from sump pumps, foundation drains and roof drains. The new building will be constructed on a slab. ' Modest snow storage areas capacity will be available on the site,primarily around the perimeter of the site in obvious push areas for snow plows. If additional storage is necessary during heavy snow seasons,the applicant will contract for the removal of snow from the site. Disposal of the ' snow will follow State and Local hauling and disposal regulations. There are generally no natural features present that require protection or enhancement. There are ' several trees which will be removed through development of the site. These trees vary in quality and health but appear to be the result of a lack of maintenance resulting in woody growth establishing over time. The trees offer minimal aesthetic, shading or environmental benefit. The ' enhancement to the site landscaping will include the planting of 15 new trees which will offset the loss of existing trees and enhance the site screening, aesthetics and shading of paved parking and pedestrian areas. Several of the trees are proposed along the Lafayette Street Frontage. The ' site landscaping plan will also include extensive shrub and perennial infill plantings between the trees. ' The site has no significant topographical variations. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the extent practicable. The new storm water management system will be constructed as shown on the Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan(C-4). Additional information ' on the design methodology for the stormwater management system is included in a Drainage Letter and supporting documentation enclosed with this application. ' The design of the new building has evolved considerably as part of the public approval process. The applicant has taken input from neighbors and community groups and has incorporated it into the design of the building to ensure that it is compatible with the surrounding area. Materials and ' colors will be chosen to fit with the architecture of neighboring buildings and the height of the new structure in consistent with others in the area. 1 1 ' The, Morin-Cameron ED ' February 25, 2016 ' Salem Planning Board Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street ' Salem, MA 01970 Re: Re-Development of 331 Lafayette Street, Salem, MA ' Mixed-Use Commercial Building - Stormwater Management Summary Dear Members of the Board: ' On behalf of 331 Lafayette, LLC, The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. (MCG) has prepared this letter to provide supporting documentation on the existing and proposed stormwater conditions associated with the Site Plan Review application for the re-development of 331-335 Lafayette ' Street and 5-7 & 11 West Avenue in Salem, Massachusetts. The associated plan set is entitled "331 Lafayette Street Mixed-Use Commercial Building" prepared by MCG and dated February 25, 2016. Included with this letter is the following: Figure 1: 2008 Ortho Map Figure 2: USGS Map • Figure 3: SCS Soils Map ' • Figure 4: FEMA Flood Map • Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan ' Executive Summary 331 Lafayette Street, LLC, the project proponent, proposes to construct a three-story mixed- used commercial building at the northeasterly corner of Lafayette Street and West Avenue in ' Salem, Massachusetts. The subject property is comprised of parcels 231 through 234, shown on the City of Salem Assessor's Map 32, wh0Tw_il(_be.combined•pendingproject-approvaIrThis redevelopment project will require Site Plan Review approval by the Salem Planning Board. The 1 following drainage narrative contains a description of existing and proposed site conditions, stormwater management design methodology and results summaries and other supplemental information in support of the stormwater best management system design. ' Existing Site Description The most prominent existing building is located on the corner at 331-335 Lafayette Street, and ' is occupied by several commercial uses, with a multi-family residential use on the West Avenue frontage. A paved parking area is located to the north and east of the building, which can be accessed from both Lafayette Street and West Avenue. Adjacent to this building, at 5-7 West ' Avenue, sits a multi-family residential building with paved parking in the rear. Both of these existing structures will be demolished during the construction phase, and all existing pavement wilt be removed. The remaining parcel at 11 West Avenue is comprised of a two-family dwelling, ' with parking and a yard area in the rear. The proposed development plan will preserve this CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LAND USE PLANNERS 447 Boston Street (U.S. Route 1) Topsfield, MA 01983 978.887.8586 FAX 978.887.3480 ' Providing Professional Services Since 1978 www.morineameron.com Salem Planning Board 2 February 25, 2016 ' existing two-family dwelling, and will only utilize the area occupied by the driveway and yard area in the rear. The total area of the project site is 42,060 square feet±. ' The site is bordered to the west by Lafayette Street, to the south by West Avenue, to the east by a single-family dwelling and to the north by a multi-family dwelling. As shown on the associated ' site plans prepared by the Morin-Cameron Group, Inc., the site is located at the intersection of several zoning districts, including Business Neighborhood (61), Residential Two Family (112) and Residential One Family (R1), as wet[ as a portion being located in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. ' Grades on the site are highest at the southwesterly corner, and slope downward to the north and northeast, ranging in slope from 1% to 4%. The site has a high elevation of 33 ft. (NAVD88) ' at the southwesterly corner and a tow elevation of 28 ft. at the northeasterly corner. Stormwater runoff from the site sheet flows to Lafayette Street and West Avenue along the roadway frontages. The rear portion of the site sheet flows towards adjacent properties, eventually ' making its way to Lafayette Street to the northwest of the site. This will be explained in greater detail later in this letter. ' Soils on site are classified as Urban Land (602), as defined in the Soil Resource Report for Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part Version 10 dated June 29, 2015 (See Figure 3: SCS Soils Map). Field testing performed by MCG on February 12, 2016 identified the native soil conditions, ' which are expected to underlie much of the developed and fitted land on the site. The Soil Test Log is located on the Grading, Drainage & Utility Plan, which describes a soil profile with a fairly well-drained topsoil and a restrictive poorly-drained subsoil layer. This type of soil is typically ' assigned to Hydrologic Soil Group C. Indication of a seasonal perched water table was observed at approximately 30 inches below grade at the test hole location. Areas of [edge outcrops can be observed in the vicinity the site, although no refusal was encountered to a depth of 96 ' inches. The entire site is shown to be in a Zone X on the FEMA Federat Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) ' #25009C0419G, dated July 16, 2014 (See Figure 4: FEMA Map). There are no wetlands located on or within 100 feet of the site. ' Proposed Site Conditions The project proponent proposes to develop the property with a three-story mixed-use commercial building, with retail and office uses on the first floor, and office uses on the second ' and third floor. A paved parking tot with 72 spaces wilt be located to the north and east of the building, with a one-way entrance located on Lafayette Street and a one-way exit located on West Avenue. As part of this project, a minor widening of the West Avenue roadway adjacent to ' the new building is proposed, which will accommodate a right-hand turning lane to facilitate the flow of traffic headed northbound on Lafayette Street. The Lafayette Street frontage will be the main access point for the commerciat/retail uses, and a plaza area has been included in this ' location to facilitate pedestrian use. The doors located on the east side of the building will provide access to the space dedicated for office uses. ' The proposed building will be serviced by new water, sewer and gas utilities, brought in from the existing mains located in West Avenue. Electric, telephone and cable services will be coordinated with the local utility providers. The existing two-family dwelling in the southeasterly ' corner of the site will be preserved, and will be separated from the mixed-use development by a ' Salem Planning Board 3 February 25, 2016 ' fence and landscape buffer. The existing parking area for this dwelling will be relocated from the rear of the building to the west side, accommodating the same number of parking spaces.. The proposed stormwater management system for the site will consist of various Best Management Practice (BMP) techniques in both mitigating and renovating stormwater runoff prior to entering the existing Lafayette Street closed drainage system. Existing Watershed Characteristics The existing site contains approximately 32,630 square feet of impervious land cover, comprised of roof areas and pavement, with a total area of 42,060 square feet. The remaining area is comprised of pervious surfaces such as small grass areas and landscape beds, as well as the existing gravel driveway at 11 West Avenue. i ' Stormwater runoff generated from the portion of the site adjacent to Lafayette Street.and West. Avenue flows onto the roadway and into the municipal closed drainage system. A portion of the runoff from the existing roof areas on site also flows toward the roadway. The closed drainage ' system for both roadways is connected at the intersection of Lafayette Street and West Avenue, with combined flows being conveyed in a northerly direction along Lafayette Street. Stormwater runoff in the rear portions of the site sheet flows overland to a shallow depressed area straddling the rear of 11 and 13 West Avenue. This is the collection point for the surrounding neighborhood, exclusive of the watershed area that drains directly to the existing ' streets. As noted above, this area drains towards 327 Lafayette Street to the north before reaching the municipal closed drainage system. It appears that grading in the rear of 327 Lafayette Street created a shallow depression on the subject property. A review of the USGS ' map corroborates the assertion that the original flow path for this watershed is to the northwest toward Lafayette Street, through the property now known as 327 Lafayette Street. Due to the generally favorable soil conditions, this existing site runoff is allowed to infiltrate in the low- lying area, with any overflow that may be generated from unusually large storm events being directed overland toward Lafayette Street to the northwest. It wit[ be the intent of the proposed stormwater design to replicate the recharge capacity lost by paving the rear portion or 11 West ' Avenue. Proposed Watershed Characteristics The redevelopment of the site as will consist of 36,180 square feet of impervious land cover, comprised of the new roof area, sidewalks and paved parking lot. The remaining area will be comprised of mulched landscape beds, planted according to the Planting Plan. The site grading ' has been designed to provide adequate drainage, to prevent puddling and to preserve existing drainage patterns to the extent practicable. The general intent of the proposed drainage system is to effectively and efficiently convey on- site runoff to the existing closed drainage system in Lafayette Street. The stormwater management measures to be implemented include a series of deep-sump hooded catch basins to capture runoff from the parking lot and provide sediment and floatable oil entrapment prior ' to conveyance and discharge into the closed drainage system in Lafayette Street. Connection to the existing closed drainage system will be achieved at the existing drain manhole in Lafayette Street adjacent to the proposed site entrance. By virtue of the proposed site design and ' drainage infrastructure, the quantity of runoff flowing toward the low-point in the northeast corner of the site will be substantially reduced. A new catch basin will be installed in the northeast corner, to provide a collection point for any runoff that may flow toward the area from t ' Salem Planning Board 4 February 25, 2016 off-site and prevent flooding at 13 West Avenue. The deep-sump hooded catch basin will convey flow into the new closed drainage system on-site, which will discharge into the existing closed drainage system in Lafayette Street. ' A subsurface recharge system for roof runoff utilizing precast concrete leaching galleys will provide mitigation and groundwater recharge, with an overflow connection to the proposed ' closed drainage system. Accepting only clean roof runoff without the need for pre-treatment, the subsurface recharge system has been designed in accordance with the recommended recharge volume of a soil that is classified as Hydrologic Soil Group C (0.25 inches per the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook, Volume 1, Chapter 1). The runoff depth of 0.25 inches is typically applied only to the loss in available pervious land area as a result of the proposed development, which in this case would be 3,550 SF. Instead of providing storage only for the ' increased impervious area, the proposed subsurface recharge system has been designed to provide recharge for the entire amount of post-development impervious area (36,180 SF). Essentially, this method of calculating the recharge volume assumes that the site is completely ' undeveloped land prior to construction, which is a conservative approach. A summary of the site characteristics in both the existing and proposed conditions is presented ' in the table below, followed by a calculation for the storage volume that the subsurface recharge system design was based upon. WATERSHED AREA SUMMARY Existing Proposed %Difference Landscape 7,785 5,880 -24% ' Roof Area 13,214 9,100 -31% Pavement 19,414 27,080 39% Gravel Area 1,647 0 -100% TOTAL 42,060 42,060 Total Impervious 32,628 36,180 11% %Impervious 1 78% 1 86% 8% Subsurface Recharge System Sizing Calculation ' Total Proposed Impervious Area = 36,180 SF Hydrologic Soil Group C Volume to Recharge x Impervious Area = 0.25 in. Required Recharge Volume = 36,180 SF x 0.25 in.(1 ft./12 in.) = 754 cubic feet (CF) ' Provided Recharge Volume = 4 concrete galleys x 200 CF/galley + (580 SF stone base x 0.5 ft depth x 0.4 voids) = 916 CF ' Conclusion This re-development project, as proposed, provides an effective and efficient means of managing stormwater runoff, and represents an improvement over the existing conditions on ' the site. The recharge volume for sizing the subsurface recharge system was designed for 100% of the impervious area, even though the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook requires only the increased impervious area be considered. If the increased impervious area is used in the 1 Salem Planning Board 5 February 25, 2016 ' calculation and an A type soil is assumed (most conservative approach), then the recharge volume would be 178 CF. Clearly, the 916 CF volume provided far exceeds conventional practices for recharge to groundwater. ' We trust this report and supporting documents and calculations provides sufficient demonstration that the project sufficiently meets the drainage standards of the City of Salem. If ' you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (978) 887-8586. 1 4S',rncerey, UP, INC. P.E. SPC/kmm Attachments tcc: 331 Lafayette, LLC Atty. Scott Grover i 1 ' X:\Burr,Robert\3359\Docs\Drainage\Stormwater Narrative.docx 1 .4 -. � • +lam ! '#♦,�"n ^.. � 5R__ ��"" t � �. s a '� ♦! v A' ,n`, w • : pbr" 1 yrs ; 7i�'r.' bjy �+,'U '1�'l' 000! `� r` ,r 1..,..+�T is w�°� (g- '' a.. •'-. j • ) spa j r y' MEWLIM 2008 ORTHO MAP f.;, x'•44 ��-� 6 V,ir r � d ~R sr„ •} ROSTE 1, TO aNA-UfM ` :AYETTE ST P 1978.887.8586 F 1978.887.3480 IN WWW.MORINCAMERON.COM • / •I „ •i.?!(,r t �„ �Y.;�t �9--,;�„V� .! Fx�, j �! � y y y a.a J,r � r.�- ' i � O s �p ��` � alx1W4 ..I1 � r',: T !•i. ''?•. I •� �tk� i• y« tT ��fy P ly� y t a '1� X .✓ 7�.5! ,a'f '! lr�' S• ; iya•�4 • � J.r.�. V N , t ` jj. a+.i aas r� t . 4 w.. a u S 5'? * `e , ��. a.f , F�t_ y • a• f y- fil TIC a �ti5 i' t�!q,yti..J. 11, ! - • ,• a •, f�k! tf.,J♦ � ! MF`t ebt: s�lY Pl.�i�' iV�' _.. a Y •'��'� M''♦ ; �.� S�Alr�rft S J t �e `*ylal - - ♦ ��yy.ggg st IT'yi,1, e'fll ^• U J I j;�Av ti�7� y,Ye �^p{,, _ ��! tF Y't � � �� t i � E�1Ly. t{ . .,a R { aM' •� +e v. P+yy{ r,/ , • t{ y y �X, ,LOCUS fit. 'fy may.! 5}.- °_ ,., '"+ + +� •.a c ayJ �Y' i l +iR t1•� �. � 4� va,14• iraj" �� 4 r '�J. �. ..ic'r't`JT'... ,` 'L„Ai4' r a a as s r �.- ) t a�, -t , r • . a j ' ��. ” tr t� � y iiy� �t't 'ft! ?"a '- 't ; • iXf" rF+ r_ ` a t+J n ' i a t,r. �;... r�fw P� �_ ♦ i � ju f��. t! _ . t• r- . i _ r $Yi�.t� ."�� s � 1,�¢«->s' !' s`t ! 17� x ., a.�,V��'�• a a � �'� (] THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, INC. USGS MAP 447 BOSTON STREET, US ROUTE 1, TOPSFIELD, MA 01983 331 LAFAYETTE ST P 1978.887.8586 F 1978.887.3480 IN ' WWW.MORINCAMERON.COM SALEM, MA ' ATE: FEBRUARY 25, 201 SCALE: 1 " = 500' FIGURE #2 _' , I �- `•fir . � } • a�flJb, }til �4{I9, IR F ''y •k T f } � � vS � y YYi •�� I 4 * !Y X 1 �ItF( i 1 -0�M1.Y• 1 1 /1 •1 1 MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, SCS SOILS ♦ ■ : • • • • • 1331 LAFAYETTE ST 1 IN SALEM, MA WWW.MORINCAMERON.COM • 1 1 1 w i x 1 a NAZI' .a • ~^� TE ,R—1E� J � s P s SMESSEAVV�' y� �`4F r. .. Jr t•^ a„TREET� �t.S�i p-? MESSERVY 1 c�1��Cat •• a �� . ..As J Z�F +� t• : COURT -'Y' i r, , 1{11 '-•' i,�F�y{{_�r S•y c!'► ��'` ' SYREET =•AVENUE�•m� �.�,.�'vs L " �'` s-o {y"•.rrc 7_. '��� rt;, �, .Y.wa.. `GIENOALE�. •: �'f �(El tii) �-,�' •J a a s�-v - V� � �,`ia°SYP EET .'.. ��` ' y�T... yi h• ' DOWN ....: a ..:- UE S OCEAN-.AqNV �a(•'S.{'_. '� y>{ 1� `'80CEAN �fp � 'i • f�_ .:'c• � � ,;m s5 TERRACES `Z`O t1J� r� :. A 1 m n Fa 1if . .` ..•y� .LSYREET iW .a. s aLOCUST AVENUl 'N�E`,��1%c ,.Y: aMwa } ZONE 1 t ;�:•WFDREST.0.VEN,.U.. y �z .,..smt` ^ 'A' y9r ,.•sem f :vert"' of?Sale '. ;20NErAiE atv 1 1ti�p.W aJ.- . i�v3a. :.. ; SPNEN��QF�• 4 '25' 0mo %�s ` � .(EL11 FS'w -c ¢ 1612 nor t r ATLANTIC^^• JAS�- a Ke- -: :.. �`�Jv�• 4ii `q h °♦- 9c+°?°�sY{}��y r r. ZQ`PIE AE �4r�� T>+� B9 i V'S 9w 1 ,✓} Pi r HEMENA' AQ" • la ' ff fl -iTJ �9y' A � ' AESROAD ti••, 1 •rin •�,G1.�6F. aysde�aJ ' FAIRVIEN!ROAD ,AALE `�C>prF9%� �� n ,�$ JEGGLE�, c i • � y . s4 ' � e 1,OQLsA {{ H0.RB�Ofl�VIEWi'S- � `� " ISLArND �� ��,.. ' NE 83Y'!� • J�•.:�{ e. aj��rn. sY , a. ^�,�, r� f. - ,Eq l i •y s''." 41 Ty� NF� r � S s�'3 lA h�• ;aa '; m a �O a� ;��'� r �': :• c �N..\9 7 ri a 41\1:: f�[ "�%.��Su g��F.t^i :: � 0 250 500 1,000 1 FEMA MAP No: 25009CO-419G THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, INC. FEMA MAP 1 447 BOSTON STREET, US ROUTE I, TOPSFIELD, MA 01983 331 LAFAYETTE ST P 1978.887.8586 F 1978.887.3480 IN 1 WWW.MORINCAMERON.COM SALEM, MA 1 ATE: FEBRUARY 25, 201 Scale: I " = 500' FIGURE #4 Stormwater Best Management Practices ' Operation and Maintenance Plan for 331 Lafayette Street ' Salem, Massachusetts The following operation and maintenance plan has been prepared as a guidance document for the ' efficient implementation,operation and maintenance of the on-site stormwater management systems. The following procedures shall be implemented to ensure success of the Stormwater Management Plan: 1. The contractor shall comply with the details of construction of the site as shown on the approved plans. 2. The catch basins and subsurface infiltration systems shalt be maintained as shown in the manufacturer's guidelines and as indicated below. 3. Effective erosion control measurers during and after construction shall be maintained until a stable finish surface is established on all altered areas. Basic Information ' Stormwater Management System Owner: 331 Lafayette, LCC 75 Nanepashemet Street Marblehead, MA 01945 ' Salem Engineering Division: City Engineer 120 Washington Street ' Salem, MA 01970 P: (978) 619-5673 ' Salem Planning Board: Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 P: (978) 619-5685 1 Page � 1 1 General Conditions ' 1. The developer shall be responsible for scheduling regular inspections and maintenance of the stormwater BMP's until the project has been completed. The BMP maintenance shall be ' conducted as detailed in the following long-term pollution prevention plan and illustrated on the approved design plans: "Site Plan of Land In Salem, Massachusetts, 331-335 Lafayette Street& 5,7 & 11 West Avenue", ' fifteen sheets prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. dated February 25, 2016 as revised and approved by the Salem Planning Board. 2. All Stormwater BMP's shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the design plans and ' the following Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan. 3. The owner shall: a. Maintain an Operation and Maintenance Log (see Attachment A) for the last three years. The Log shall include all BMP inspections, repairs, replacement activities and disposal activities ' (disposal material and disposal location shall be included in the Log); b. Make the log available to the Salem Engineering Division and Planning Board upon request; c. Allow members and agents of the Salem Engineering Division and Planning Board to enter ' the premises and ensure that the Owner has complied with the Operation and Maintenance Plan requirements for each BMP. 4. A recommended inspection and maintenance schedule is outlined below based on statewide ' averages. This inspection and maintenance schedule shall be adhered to at a minimum for the first year of service of all BMP's referenced in this document. At the commencement of the first year of service, a more accurate inspection/maintenance schedule shall be determined based on ' the level of service for this site. 1 Page 2 , Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan t 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts 1 ' Construction Phase Pollution Prevention Plan Erosion and Sedimentation Controls during Construction: The site and drainage construction contractor shalt be responsible for maintaining the stormwater system during construction. Routine maintenance of all items shalt be performed to ensure adequate ' runoff and pollution control during construction. A proposed silt sock will be placed in the locations shown on the Grading Plan prior to the commencement of any clearing, grubbing, earth removal or construction activity. The integrity of the ' erosion control barrier will be maintained by periodic inspection and replacement as necessary. The erosion control barrier will remain in place until the first course of pavement has been placed and all side slopes have been toamed and seeded and vegetation has been established. Silt sacks will be ' placed in the existing catch basins along Lafayette Street and West Avenue. Silt sacks wilt also be placed in the new catch basins once constructed. Structural Practices: 1) Mulch Sock—A mulch sock sediment barrier will be constructed around the limit of work as indicated on the Grading and Drainage Plan to prevent the spreading of fine sediments from ' the site. This control wit[ be installed prior to major soil disturbance on the site. Mulch Sock Requirements a) Locate the mulch sock upland where identified on the plans. ' b) The mulch sock should be nearly level through most of its length to impound a broad, temporary pool. The last 10 to 20 feet at each end of the mulch sock should be swung slightly uphill (approximately 0.5 feet in elevation) to provide storage capacity. ' c) Stake the mulch sock in accordance with the construction details. d) The mulch sock should be removed when it has served its useful purpose, but not before the upslope area has been permanently stabilized through one growing season. ' Retained sediment must be removed and properly disposed of, or mulched and seeded. Mulch Sock Inspection/Maintenance a) Mulch socks should be inspected immediately after each rainfall event of 1-inch or ' greater, and at least daily during prolonged rainfall. Inspect the depth of sediment, tears, if the mulch sock is securely attached to the stakes, and to see that the stakes are firmly in the ground. Repair or replace as necessary. ' b) Remove sediment deposits promptly after storm events to provide adequate storage volume for the next rain and to reduce pressure on the mulch sock. Sediment will be removed from behind the mulch sock when it becomes about 4" deep at the mulch ' sock. Take care to avoid undermining the mulch sock during cleanout. c) If the mulch sock tears, decomposes, or in any way becomes ineffective, replace it immediately. d) Remove all mulch sock materials after the contributing drainage area has been properly stabilized. The mulch can remain at the discretion of the owner as this will decompose over time. However, any fabric or stakes should be removed. Sediment deposits remaining after the mulch sock has been removed should be graded to conform to the existing topography and vegetation. 2) Intet Protection— Inlet Protection will be utilized around the catch basins that are installed. The inlet protection will allow the storm drain inlets to be used before final stabilization. This structural practice wilt allow early use of the drainage system. Siltsack or equivalent will be Page 13 i ' Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts t utilized for the inlet protection. Siltsack is manufactured by ACF Environmental. The telephone number is 800-448-3636. Regular flow siltsack will be utilized, and if it does not allow enough storm water flow, hi-flow siltsack will be utilized. ' Silt Sack (or equivalent) Inlet Protection Inspection/Maintenance Requirements a) The silt sack trapping device and the catch basin should be inspected after every rain storm and repairs made as necessary. , b) Sediment should be removed from the silt sack after the sediment has reached a maximum depth of one-half the depth of the trap. c) Sediment should be disposed of in a suitable area and protected from erosion by either ' structural or vegetative means. Sediment material removed shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. d) The silt sack must be replaced if it is ripped or torn in any way. ' e) Temporary traps should be removed and the area repaired as soon as the contributing drainage area to the inlet has been completely stabilized. 3) Sediment Track-Out (Stabilized Construction Exit) - Prior to the commencement of site , work, crushed stone anti-tracking pads will be installed at the egress area to the street. This will prevent trucks from tracking material onto the road from the construction site. If, at any ' point during the project, the tracking pad becomes ineffective due to accumulation of soil, the crushed stone shall be replaced. Details for construction of the stabilized entrance can be found in the Construction Details sheet that is part of the comprehensive permit plan set ' associated with the project. The site supervisor will inspect the tracking pads weekly to ensure that they are properly limiting the tracking of soil onto the road. If tracking onto the roadway is noted, it shall be removed immediately via a mechanical street sweeper. ' Stabilization Practices: Stabilization measures shall be implemented as soon as practicable in portions of the site where ' construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased, with the following exceptions. ' • Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity temporary or permanently cease is precluded by snow cover, stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable. ' • Where construction activity will resume on a portion of the site within 21 days from when activities ceased, (e.g. the total time period that construction activity is temporarily ceased is less than 21 days) then stabilization measures do not have to be initiated on that portion of ' the site by the 14th day after construction activity temporarily ceased. 1) Temporary Seeding — Temporary seeding will allow a short-term vegetative cover on ' disturbed site areas that may be in danger of erosion.Temporary seeding will be done at stock piles and disturbed portions of the site where construction activity will temporarily cease for at least 21 days. The temporary seedings will stabilize cleared and unvegetated areas that will ' not be brought into final grade for several weeks or months. Temporary Seeding Planting Procedures a) Planting should preferably be done between April 11t and June 301h, and September 1st ' through September 31 It. If planting is done in the months of July and August, irrigation may be required. If planting is done between October 1 I and March 311, mulching should Page 14 ' Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan , 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts be applied immediately after planting. If seeding is done during the summer months, irrigation of some sort will probably be necessary. b) Before seeding, install structural practice controls. Utilize Amoco supergro or equivalent. c) Select the appropriate seed species for temporary cover from the following table. ' Species Seeding Rate Seeding Rate Recommended Seeding Seed Cover (lbs/1,000 s .ft.) (lbs/acre) Dates required Annual 1 40 April 11 to June 11' 1/4 inch ' R e rass August 15th to Sept. 15th Foxtail 0.7 30 May 1st to June 30th 1/2 to 3/4 inch Millet Oats 2 80 April 1st to July 111 1 to 1-1/2 inch August 151h to Sept. 15th Winter 3 120 August 15th to Oct. 15th 1 to 1 1/z inch ' R e Apply the seed uniformly by hydroseeding, broadcasting, or by hand. ' d) Use effective mulch, such as clean grain straw, tacked and/or tied with netting to protect seedbed and encourage plant growth. Temporary Seeding Inspection/Maintenance ' a) Inspect within 6 weeks of planting to see if stands are adequate. Check for damage within 24 hours of the end to a heavy rainfall, defined as a 2-year storm event (i.e., 3.2 inches of rainfall within a twenty-four hour period). Stands should be uniform and dense. Reseed and mulch damaged and sparse areas immediately. Tack or tie down mulch as necessary. b) Seeds should be supplied with adequate moisture. Furnish water as needed, especially in abnormally hot or dry weather. Water application rates should be controlled to prevent ' runoff. 2) Geotextites-Geotextiles such asjute netting will be used in combination with other practices ' such as mulching to stabilize slopes. The following geotextile materials or equivalent are to be utilized for structural and nonstructural controls as shown in the following table. I ' Practice Manufacturer Product Remarks Sediment Fence Amoco Woven polypropylene 0.425 mm opening 1198 orequivalent I ' Construction Amoco Woven polypropylene 0.300 mm opening Entrance 2002 orequivalent Outlet Amoco Nonwoven polypropylene 0.150 mm opening Protection 4551 orequivalent Erosion Control Amoco Supergro or equivalent Erosion control (slope stability) revegetation mix, open ' polypropylene fiber on degradable polypropylene net ' scrim Amoco may be reached at (800) 445-7732 Page � 5 ' Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts Geotextile Installation a) Netting and matting require firm, continuous contact between the materials and the soil. ' If there is no contact, the material will not hold the soil and erosion wilt occur underneath the material. Geotextile Inspection/Maintenance , a) In the field, regular inspections should be made to check for cracks, tears, or breaches in the fabric. The appropriate repairs should be made. 3) Mulching and Netting—Mulching will provide immediate protection to exposed soils during ' the period of short construction delays, or over winter months through the application of plant residues, or other suitable materials, to exposed soil areas. In areas, which have been ' seeded either for temporary or permanent cover, mulching should immediately follow seeding. On steep slopes, mulch must be supplemented with netting. The preferred mulching material is straw. ' Mulch (Hay or Straw) Materials and Installation a) Straw has been found to be one of the most effective organic mulch materials. The , specifications for straw are described below, but other material may be appropriate. The straw should be air-dried; free of undesirable seeds & coarse materials. The application rate per 1,000 sq.ft. is 90-100 lbs. (2-3 bales) and the application rate per acre is 2 tons , (100-120 bales). The application should cover about 90% of the surface. The use of straw mulch is appropriate where mulch is maintained for more than three months. Mulch Maintenance ' a) Inspect after rainstorms to check for movement of mulch or erosion. If washout, breakage, or erosion occurs, repair surface, reseed, remulch, and install new netting. b) Straw or grass mulches that blow or wash away should be repaired promptly. ' c) If plastic netting is used to anchor mulch, care should be taken during initial mowings to keep the mower height high. Otherwise, the netting can wrap up on the mower blade shafts. After a period of time, the netting degrades and becomes less of a problem. ' d) Continue inspections until vegetation is well established. 4) Land Grading — Grading on fill slopes, cut slopes, and stockpile areas will be done with full , siltation controls in place. Land Grading Design/Installation Requirements a) Areas to be graded should be cleared and grubbed of all timber, togs, brush, rubbish, and vegetated matter that wilt interfere with the grading operation. Topsoil should be stripped ' and stockpiled for use on critical disturbed areas for establishment of vegetation. Cut slopes to be topsoiled should be thoroughly scarified to a minimum depth of 3-inches prior to placement of topsoil. , b) Fill materials should be generally free of brush, rubbish, rocks, and stumps. Frozen materials or soft and easily compressible materials should not be used in fills intended to support buildings, parking lots, roads, conduits, or other structures. ' c) Earth fill intended to support structural measures should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of Standard Proctor Test density with proper moisture control, or as otherwise specified by the engineer responsible for the design. Compaction of other fills should be ' to the density required to control sloughing, erosion or excessive moisture content. Maximum thickness of fill layers prior to compaction should not exceed 9 inches. Page 16 ' Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan 331 Lafayette Street ' Salem, Massachusetts d) The uppermost one foot of fill slopes should be compacted to at least 85 percent of the maximum unit weight (based on the modified AASHTO compaction test). This is usually ' accomplished by running heavy equipment over the fill. e) Fill should consist of material from borrow areas and excess cut will be stockpiled in areas shown on the Site Plans. All disturbed areas should be free draining, left with a neat and ' finished appearance, and should be protected from erosion. Land Grading Stabilization Inspection/Maintenance a) All slopes should be checked periodically to see that vegetation is in good condition. Any ' rills or damage from erosion and animal burrowing should be repaired immediately to avoid further damage. b) If seeps develop on the slopes, the area should be evaluated to determine if the seep will ' cause an unstable condition. Subsurface drains or a gravel mulch may be required to solve seep problems. However, no seeps are anticipated. c) Areas requiring revegetation should be repaired immediately. Control undesirable vegetation such as weeds and woody growth to avoid bank stability problems in the future. ' 5) T_psoiting — Topsoiling will help establish vegetation on all disturbed areas throughout the site during the seeding process. The soil texture of the topsoil to be used will be a sandy loam to a silt loam texture with 15% to 20% organic content. I ' Topsoiling Placement a) Topsoil should not be placed while in a frozen or muddy condition, when the subgrade is excessively wet, or when conditions exist that may otherwise be detrimental to proper grading or proposed seeding. ' b) Do not place topsoil on slopes steeper than 2.5:1, as it will tend to erode. c) If topsoil and subsoil are not property bonded, water will not infiltrate the soil profile evenly and it will be difficult to establish vegetation. The best method is to actually work ' the topsoil into the layer below for a depth of at least 6 inches. 6) Permanent Seeding—Permanent Seeding should be done immediately after the final design grades are achieved. Native species of plants should be used to establish perennial vegetative cover on disturbed areas. The revegetation should be done early enough in the fall so that a good cover is established before cold weather comes and growth stops until the spring. A good cover is defined as vegetation covering 75 percent or more of the ground surface. ' Permanent Seeding Seedbed Preparation a) In infertile or coarse-textured subsoil, it is best to stockpile topsoil and re-spread it over ' the finished slope at a minimum 2 to 6-inch depth and roll it to provide a firm seedbed. The topsoil must have a sandy loam to silt loam texture with 15%to 20% organic content. If construction fill operations have left soil exposed with a loose, rough, or irregular ' surface, smooth with blade and roll. b) Loosen the soil to a depth of 3-5 inches with suitable agricultural or construction equipment. c) Areas not to receive topsoil shall be treated to firm the seedbed after incorporation of the time and fertilizer so that it is depressed no more than 1/2 - 1 inch when stepped on with a shoe. Areas to receive topsoil shall not be firmed until after topsoiling and lime and Page 17 ' Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts fertilizer is applied and incorporated, at which time it shall be treated to firm the seedbed ' as described above. i Permanent Seeding Grass Selection/Application a) Select an appropriate cool or warm season grass based on site conditions and seeding ' date. Apply the seed uniformly by hydro-seeding, broadcasting, or by hand. Uniform seed distribution is essential. On steep slopes, hydroseeding may be the most effective seeding method. Surface roughening is particularly important when preparing slopes for ' hydroseeding. b) Lime and fertilize. Organic fertilizer shall be utitized in areas within the 100 foot buffer zone to a wetland resource area. ' c) Mulch the seedings with straw applied at the rate of 1/2 tons per acre. Anchor the mulch with erosion control netting or fabric on sloping areas. Amoco supergro or equivalent should be utilized. ' Permanent Seeding Inspection/Maintenance a) Frequently inspect seeded areas for failure and make necessary repairs and reseed ' immediately. Conduct or follow-up survey after one year and replace failed plants where necessary. b) If vegetative cover is inadequate to prevent rill erosion, overseed and fertilize in ' accordance with soil test results. c) If a stand has less than 40% cover, reevaluate choice of plant materials and quantities of time and fertilizer. Re-establish the stand following seedbed preparation and seeding ' recommendations, omitting time and fertilizer in the absence of soil test results. If the season prevents resowing, mulch orjute netting is an effective temporary cover. d) Seeded areas should be fertilized during the second growing season. Lime and fertilize ' thereafter at periodic intervals, as needed. Organic fertilizer shall be utilized in areas within the 100-foot buffer zone to a wetland resource area. Dust Control: ' Dust control will be utilized throughout the entire construction process of the site. For example, keeping disturbed surfaces moist during windy periods will be an effective control measure, ' especially for construction access roads. The use of dust control will prevent the movement of soil to offsite areas. However, care must be taken to not create runoff from excessive use of water to control dust. The following are methods of Dust Control that may be used on-site: ' • Vegetative Cover—The most practical method for disturbed areas not subject to traffic. • Calcium Chloride—Calcium chloride may be applied by mechanical spreader as toose, dry granules or flakes at a rate that keeps the surface moist but not so high as to cause water , pollution or plant damage. • Sprinkling —The site may be sprinkled until the surface is wet. Sprinkling wilt be effective for dust control on haul roads and other traffic routes. ' • Stone — Stone will be used to stabilize construction roads; will also be effective for dust control. The general contractor shall employ an on-site water vehicle for the control of dust as necessary. ' Non-Stormwater Discharges: Page 18 ' Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan ' 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts The construction de-watering and all non-stormwater discharges will be directed into a sediment dirt bag (or equivalent inlet protection) or a sediment basin. Sediment material removed shall be ' disposed of in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. The developer and site general contractor will comply with the E.P.A.'s Final General Permit for Construction De-watering Discharges, (N.P.D.E.S., Section 402 and 40 C.F.R. 122.26(b)(14)(x). Inspection/Maintenance: ' Operator personnel must inspect the construction site at least once every 14 calendar days and within 24 hours of a storm event of '/2-inch or greater. The applicant shall be responsible to secure the services of a design professional or similar professional (inspector) on an on-going ' basis throughout all phases of the project. The inspector should review the erosion and sediment controls with respect to the following: • Whether or not the measure was installed/performed correctly. ' Whether or not there has been damage to the measure since it was installed or performed. • What should be done to correct any problems. The inspector should complete the Stormwater Management Construction Phase BMP Inspection Schedule and Evaluation Checklist, as attached,for documenting the findings and should request the required maintenance or repair for the pollution prevention measures when the inspector finds that it is necessary for the measure to be effective. The inspector should notify the appropriate person to make the changes and submit copies of the form to the Salem Engineering Department. It is essential that the inspector document the inspection of the pollution prevention measures. ' These records wilt be used to request maintenance and repair and to prove that the inspection and maintenance were performed. The forms list each of the measures to be inspected on the site,the inspector's name,the date of the inspection,the condition of the measure/area inspected, maintenance or repair performed and any changes which should be made to the Operation and Maintenance Plan to control or eliminate unforeseen pollution of storm water. 1 Page 9 Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts 1 Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan (LTPPP) Vegetated Areas: ' Immediately after construction, monitoring of the erosion control systems shall occur until establishment of natural vegetation. Afterwards, vegetated areas shall be maintained as such. Vegetation shall be replaced as necessary to ensure proper stabilization of the site. ' Cost: Included with annual landscaping budget. Consult with local landscape contractors. Paved Areas: Sweepers shall sweep paved areas periodically during dry weather to remove excess sediments and to reduce the amount of sediments that the drainage system shall have to remove from the runoff. The sweeping shalt be conducted primarily between March 15th and November 151h. Special attention ' should be made to sweeping paved surfaces in March and April before spring rains wash residual sand into the drainage system. ' The frequency of sweeping shalt average: • Monthly if by a high-efficiency vacuum sweeper • Bi-weekly if by a regenerative air sweeper ' • Weekly if by a mechanical sweeper Cost: $100-$150 per sweeping ' Salt used for de-icing on the roadway during winter months shall be limited as much as possible as this will reduce the need for removal and treatment. Sand containing the minimum amount of calcium ' chloride (or approved equivalent) needed for handling may be applied as part of the routine winter maintenance activities. Deep Sump Hooded Catch Basins: , The catch basin grates shall be checked quarterly and following heavy rainfalls to verify that the inlet openings are not clogged by debris. Debris shall be removed from the grates and disposed of ' property. Deep sump catch basins shall be inspected twice per year and cleaned as needed when accumulated sediments exceeds 2' from the bottom of the sump (approximately 1/2 of the sump capacity). Catch basins with hoods shall be inspected annually to check oil build-up and outlet obstructions. Material shall be removed from catch basins and disposed of in accordance with all ' applicable regulations Cost: Estimated $50 - $100 per cleaning per catch basin as needed. The owner shall consult local ' vacuum cleaning contractors for detailed cost estimates. Public Safety Concerns: Catch basins shalt not be left open and unattended at any time during ' inspection, cleaning or otherwise. Broken or missing grates or frames shall be replaced immediately. At no time shall any person enter the basin structure unless measures have been taken to ensure safe access in accordance with OSHA enclosed space regulations. ' Subsurface Infiltration Galleys: , The subsurface infiltration galleys and outlet structure shalt be checked for debris accumulation twice per year. The system is equipped with an inspection manhole on the first tank in the series and on the last tank in the series. Additional inspections should be scheduled during the first few months to make sure that the facility is functioning as intended. Trash, leaves, branches, etc. shall be removed from ' Page 110 Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan ' 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts 1 1 facility. Silt, sand and sediment, if significant accumulation occurs, shall be removed by rubber tired excavator annually. Material removed from the basin shalt be disposed of in accordance with all ' applicable local, state, and federal regulations. In the case that water remains in the infiltration facilities for greater than three (3) days after a storm event, an inspection is warranted and necessary maintenance or repairs should be addressed as necessary. ' The outlet structure shall be inspected annually for structural integrity. The inspections shall be conducted by qualified personnel. ' Cost: $500-$5,000 per cleaning depending on the volume of material/liquids that need to be removed. t Public Safety Concerns:The manhole covers shalt not be left open and unattended at anytime during inspection, cleaning or otherwise. Broken covers or frames shall be replaced immediately. At no time shall any person enter the subsurface structure unless measures have been taken to ensure safe access in accordance with OSHA enclosed space regulations. II' ' Debris& Litter- All debris and titter shall be removed from the site as necessary to prevent migration into the drainage system. Pesticides. Herbicides. and Fertilizers: Pesticides and herbicides shall be used sparingly. Fertilizers shall be restricted to the use of organic fertilizers only. All fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, sand and salt for deicing and the like shall be stored in dry area that is protected from weather. ' Cost: Included in the routine landscaping maintenance schedule. The Owner shalt consult local landscaping contractors for details. ' Public Safety Concerns: Chemicals shall be stored in a secure area to prevent children from obtaining access to them. Any major spills shall be reported to municipal officials. ' Prevention of Illicit Discharges: Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system are not allowed. Illicit discharges are discharges that are not comprised entirely of stormwater. Pursuant to Mass DEP Stormwater Standards t the following activities or facilities are not considered illicit discharges:firefighting,water line flushing, landscape irrigation, uncontaminated groundwater, potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation,footing drains, individual resident carwashing,flows from riparian habitats ' and wetlands, DE chlorinated water from swimming pools, water used for street washing and water used to clean residential building without detergents. ' To prevent illicit discharges to the stormwater management system the following policies should be implemented: 1. Provisions For Storing Materials And Waste Products Inside Or Under Cover ' 2. Requirements for Routine Inspections of the Stormwater Management System (i.e.: catch basins, proprietary treatment unit &subsurface infiltration system.) 3. Spill Prevention and Response Plans. 1 1 Page til Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan 331 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts Type P4 ' AAL UCM-SKB-T4-32LED-3K-700-BLK-HSS Universe" Collection Medium LED - UCM ISLA41GS CPA-4-4-4012-10-DX-BLK FEATURES (Pole mount) ' DLC qualified IP66,3G vibration housing Custom lumen packages • Up to 1000'wireless communication 20kV/101kA surge suppression Integral thermal protection ' Motion sensing up to 40'mounting height 2700-5000K CCT 0-1 DV dimmable • Superior BUG ratings >560 nm Amber 13 standard powder coat finishes • Types II, III,IV,V and Custom distributions ' SPECIFICATIONS ANGLED HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-ANG UCM-WND-ANG UCM-SR-ANG UCM-VSGANG UCM-LUM-ANG DIAMETER 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 207506mm HEIGHT 147'/373mm 20.5'/520mm 20.7'/526mm 20.5'/521 mm 20.6'/523mm ' WEIGHT 18.25 Ites/828kg 21,75 lbs/9.86k 25 Ibs/1 1.3kq 22.251bs/10.1k 24.251bs/1 like EPA .60 .72 .74 .72 .74 BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-BEL UCM-WND-BEL UCM-SR-REL UCM-VSL-BEL UCM-LUM-BEL ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 15.8'/401mm 214'/543mm 21.6/549mm 19.37'/492mm 21.57546mm WEIGHT 20.25 lbs/9.2kq 23.5 lbs/10.6k 27 Ibs/1 2.25kg 24.25 Ites/1 lkg 261bs/11.8k EPA .73 .85 .87 .85 .85 ' FLARE HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-FUR UCM-WND-FLR UCM-SR-FLR UCM-VBL-FUR UCM-LUM-FLR DIAMETER 22/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22/559mm HEIGHT 14.5/366mm 19.8'/503mm 20.1'/510mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm WEIGHT 18.5 Ibs/8.4kcj 21.75 Ibs/9.87kg 25.25 Ics/1 0.1 kg 21J5 bs/9.86kQ 24.251bs/11k ' EPA .53 .65 .67 .65 .67 STRAIGHT HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-STR UCM-WND-STIR UCM-SR-STR UCM-VSL-STR UCM-LUM-STR ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 241610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 14'/355mm 19.87503mm 20'/508mm 19.8'/503mm 19.97505mm WEIGHT 20 lbs/9.07kn 23.25 lbs/10.55k 26.75 lbs/12.13k 23.75 lbs/10.77k 25.75lbs/11.68k EPA .59 .71 .73 .71 .73 t ' SKIRTED BELL HOOD �. CONFIGURATION UCM-SKB UCM-WND-SKB UCM-SR-SKB UCM-VSL-SKB UCM-LUM-SKB DIAMETER 247610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24/610mm HEIGHT 19.7/500mm 23.97607mm 24.2'/615mm 23.9/607mm 24.1'/612mm WEIGHT 20.516s/9.31k23.75 lbs/10.77k 27 lbs/12.25k 24.251bs/11k - 1.9kci ' EPA .90 1.03 1.05 1.03 1.05 ' C&S , ® ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ' /'- 16555 East Gale Ave. I City.1 lntlustry I CA 91745 JOB ---_- architectural P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aaloet TYPE areaiighting Copyright©2014 Rev9.15 NOTES-------. I 1 I 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ORDERING INFORMATION ' 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 �- MODEL-LL Hood Distribution CCT Lumen Package Finish Options Control Voltage Mounting ' 1. DEL(Must choose one) 4.COLOR TEMPERATURE(Must choose one) 9.VOLTAGE(May choose as noted) ' UCM Universe medium without luminous element I 3K 30ODK 120-277 UAC input UCM-WND Universe medium with luminous window 4K 4000K 347 347 VAC input UCM-SR Universe medium with luminous solid rings 5K 5000K 480 480 VAC input UCM-VSL Universe medium with luminous vertical slots 27K 2700K' 35K 3500K9.MOUNTING —Must choose one ' UCM-LUM Universe medium with luminous rings AM >560nm monochromatic amber' POLE MOUNT SLA2 SLA3 2.HOOD 5.LUMEN PACKAGE(Must choose one) SLA4-2 FLR Flared hood 1 700 71 watts SLA7 SLA7-2 ' tya s SLA7(5) SLA7(5)-2 FLR-STS Flared hood in natural brushed stainless steel XMA Custom wattage or drive current' SLABD SLA9. FLR-COP Flared hood in natural brushed copper SLA9-2 SLA10 ANG Angled hood 6.FINISH(Must choose one) SLA10-2 SLA16 ANG-STS Angled hood in natural brushed stainless steel AWT Arctic White SLA16-2 SLA17 ' SLA17SLA17(5) copper ANG-COP Angled hood in natural brushed co BLK Black 5 0 SLA17(5)-2 SLA18 STR Straight hood MTB Matte Black SLA18-2 SLA20 STR-STS Straight hood in natural brushed stainless steel DGN Dark Green SLA20-2 SLA20A ' STR-COP Straight hood in natural brushed copper DBZ Dark Bronze SLA20A-2 SLA20B BEL Bell hood WRZ Weathered Bronze BRM Bronze Metallic SLA20D-2 SLA20C2 SLA20 BEL-STS Bell hood in natural brushed stainless steel VBL Verde Blue SLA20D BEL-COP Bell hood n natural brushed copper CRT Cotten SLA24 SLA24-2 t ® Skirted bell hood MAL Matte Aluminum SLA24(5) 8LA24(5)-2 TRA4 TRA7 SKB-STS Skirted bell hood in natural brushed stainless MDG Medium Grey TRA7-2 TRA8 steel ATG Antique Green TRA8-2 TRA9 SKB-COP Skirted bell hood in natural brushed copper LGY Fight Grey TRA9-2 ' RAL Premium Color 3.DISTRIBUTION(Must choose one) CUSTOM"Contact Factory WALL MOUNT MicroCore Precision aimed optics WMA4 WMA5 T2-32LED Type2 7.OPTIONS(May choose as noted) WMA6 WMAB , T3-32LED T e3 FTG Flatclearglasslens' WMA9D WMA10 T4-32LED T 4 FLD Flat diffused glass lens' WMA11 WMA12 YPe WMA16 WMA17 SAG Sag eeSides field for T5-32LED Types TypeWMA-18 WMA20 HSS House element TX-32LED Custom' WMA22D WMA24 ' SLC Unlit(luminous)element R80 80 CRI MmoMim2 WMA37 WMA38 BL Blue inner lens WMA39 ETO modified RD Red inner lens GRN Green inner lens ' left hand distribution. 6. CONTROLS—(May choose as noted) W IR wiScape connectivity 'Contact factory WIRSC wiSeape connectivity,integral 2 Note for AM color temperature ' motion sensor 3 Not for WIR,WIRSC or SCP control options SCP Integral photo-control and 'Handheld commissioning tool is required to separately motion sensor' configure oradjust any number of SCPsensors. SCPREMOTE Handheld commissioning tool° ' HSS House Side shield 1 1 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB amhlte turalting P626,968.5666 I F626.369,2695 1 www.aai.net TYPE NOTES — Copyright®2014 Rev 9.15 1 2 1 i ' Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM TYPE ' LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE g 3K Dpticai�.seconazry,Len t ,,. ,System'* w ShleldtDirbuffq LightEngine BO- . ' Bug M ngrap i 'nC€mdi+revent s•yW?a;tmts` , Y: j� x B at1nG �na B.aO-G' L r g )h B MW ' �U:�sG �.,•x .;€: £x+v.'vM„7'rr?3•- YY r{•��"/rFt az TYPE 2 T2-32LED 6186 87 2 10 12 ,65- ".:;;jtNo Lens TYPE T3-32LED 1 6168 87 1 0 2 `6542-*?, Am-:{° t%' fix "* 82 )Standard) TYPE4 T4-32LED 6081 86 1 0 2 6 ¢ ,i;; $1 1s.A 9 4 b7; 9 L T. 650 71 TYPE 5 T5-32LED 6227 86 3 0 2 'y6B �'• TJ3` *'. �1. House Side TYPE T4-32LED-..:HSS 4495 63 0 0 2 4768 67 0 0 2 4781 67 0 0 2 MicroCore Shield ' TYPE T2-32LED 4607 962 0 2 4830 103 2 0 2 4844 101 2 0 2 No Lens TYPE T3.32LED 4570 95 1 0 1 4791 700 1 0 2 4805 101 1 0 2 )Standard) TYPE T4-32LED 4570 97 1 0 2 4791 102 1 0 2 4805 100 1 0 2 450 47 TYPE T5-32LED 4602 98 3 0 1 4825 103 3 0 1 4839 101 3 0 1 ' House Side TYPE 4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 3366 72 0 0 2 3529 75 0 0 2 3539 74 0 0 2 Shield 191 a p i�� ��� ' • 0 ' ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS +�A-'��'rY„d a�.�x':a�,�a5 �T�`N: m Dnverkv�„� mat '�:� tfit'x"�4:� ? >�'Dlmmnir*,gym'✓ ` :zi ,4,,,„„' System �.' "-'4 �sz su}' n - 3 ' .` Sowcecurrent aAhaofp _ OPh2ui t < ;LED "Wattsx Lne �' s Max „ _ t a age Qraeriog Code S n h A'iBPs'AC Mm Powerq + 0 era�fDlmmm* .,opt of tMlNi Orange on Sgetem Dnve �.. t tVORege a a• THD P n9r 9 0 'u e 1',NOP..€�:z %NO .� Faetor 7iemp R�>tnge �'Re ge eai3re' u tewire Element VAC yJ7L1 20.277 Mln .xas. tlrr,-at- ' Without Luminous 700 650 71 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 Element 120 450 450 47 P77 0.4 0.2 0.1 01 MicroCore 32LED 50160 -9 20 -30°CTO+40°C 10%TO 100% OmA 1mA OrrA 1mA 700 650 73 347 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 ' WNDISRNSLILUM 480 450 450 49 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 SENSOR DETECTION RANGE i :� s "�s•^R PYO ” - ' '10? ?12`.`A�, ,'14,_-..'016'x.,-a $f 81[ COVERAGE SCP1 20' 1 25' 1 30' 1 35' 1 40' 1 45' 1 SO' 1 62.5' 1 75' 87.5' 1 100' 1'.2.5 DIAMETER I WIRSC 1 16' 1 20' 1 24' 1 28' 32' 1 36' 1 40' 1 NIA I NA I NIA I NA 12 1 LED COLOR S3K��1 i�'z�4�i'�r+�5'+Sz =i�SK 4:. •; ' CCT Average 3000K 4000K 5000K CRI Minimum 70 70 70 SIP Ratio 1.2 1 1.5 1 1.8 ' Consult factory for Amber,Turtle Friendly,Gulf Coast and Observatory applications. TM-21 LIFETIME CALCULATION ' Optical System Ordering Code Ambient Environment*C Projected Lumen Maintenance(%vs.Khrs) Reported L70 15 25 50 60 100 15 98 98 1 97 96 94 MicroCore 32LED 25 98 971 96 193 596Khrs 40 96 95 1 93 92 89 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 1655526.East Gale Ave. I City of Industry CA net TOR -- ------ archf!tectural p626.968.56661 F626.369.2695 I viww.aal.net TYPE arealighting Copyright 02014 Rev 9.15 NOTES -- — 1 3 1 Universe"" Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' SPECIFICATIONS ' HOUSING CONTROLS SERVICING • All housing components shall be die- Wireless enabled fixtures shall support Luminaire shall have tool-less service cast aluminum,sealed with continuous bi-directional radio frequency(RF) access to the gear compartment. Driver ' silicone rubber gaskets. communications utilizing IEEE 802.15 4 and surge suppressor shall be mounted • Hood and spacers shall be heavy gauge operating in the 2.4GHZ ISM band. to prewired tray with quick disconnects spun aluminum with hemmed edges for thatt may be removed from the gear added rigidity. Up to wireless range may be compartment. , reducedd by by physical obstructions • Luminous rings shall be clear acrylic with between fixtures. an internal lens. ARM MOUNTING Motion sensor shall be flame retardant, • Standard configurations do not require Luminaire shall be attached to the arm ' , p , y a flat lens,optional lenses shall be UV resistantimpact resistantrecyclable assembly with three stainless steel bolts. tempered glass polycarbonate. The connection shall be sealed with a • All internal and external hardware shall Motion Sensor shall use passive infrared silicone compression gasket. be stainless steel. (PIR)sensing technology that reacts • Post top arms and brackets shall slip • Optical bezel finish shall match the to changes in infrared energy(moving over a 4'1100mm O.D.or a 5"/127mm as ' luminaire housing. body heat)within the coverage area, configured and secured with six stainless Careful consideration must be given to steel set screws. obstructions that may block the sensor's • Wall mounted arms and brackets shall OPTICAL line of sight. require mounting hardware by others. ' • Patent pending MicroCoreTM LED Factory default settings for SCP option modules shall independently aim shall be: FINISH each light emitting diode(LED)in both horizontal rotation and vertical tilt angle. - High mode: 10V Luminaire finish shall consist of a five ' • LEDs shall be mounted metal printed - Low mode: 1V stage pretreatment regimen with a to a m circuit board assembly to a m with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off,and uniform conformal coating over the panel - Ramp-up rate:disabled top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. surface and electrical features. - Fade-down rate:disabled ' • Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA • LED optics shall be clear injection - Photocell:Oft 605.2 performance specification which molded PMMA acrylic. _ Sensitivity:Full includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray • MicroCoreTM PCRA and optic shall be test for corrosion resistance. sealed to a die-cast anodized aluminum - Time Delay:Fade to low:5 minutes ' heat sink with an injection molded Time Delay:Fade to off: 1 hour silicone rubber gasket.IP66. CERTIFICATION • Type 4 distribution with optional House • Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for Side Shield not available with clear or PHOTOCELL/EGRESS ADAPTERS outdoor,wet location use,UL1598,UL , diffused glass lenses. Factory installed 8750 and Canadian CSA Std.C22.2 House Side Shield is optimized for Type Adapters)shall slip over a 4'/100mm no.250. 4 distribution and not recommended for DIA.pole with the luminaire or arm use with Type 2 or 3 distribution and not slipping over the adapter to add a available with type 5 distribution. total of 4.5"/114mm to the overall WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' height. Adapter(s)shall be prewired, OF SALE independently rotatable 359°,and have Download: ELECTRICAL a cast access cover with an integral lens htto://www.hubbellliohtina.com/resources/ • Luminaires shall have integral surge and lanyard. warranty/ protection that shall e U.L.recognized Photocell adapter shall include an internal and have a surge current rating 10,000 Amps using the industry standardrd twist lock receptacle. Photocell by others. 8/20uSec wave and surge rating of 372J. Egress adapter shall require an auxiliary , • Drivers shall be U.L recognized with an 120 volt supply for operation of an integral inrush current maximum of<20.0 Amps MR16 lamp in the event of emergency. maximum at 230VAC. The lamp may be aimed and locked into • Drivers shall not be compatible with position with an adjustment range of current sourcing dimmers,consult 15°45°. Adapter shall have a socket that ' factory for current list of known accepts miniature bi-pin MR16 lamps up compatible dimming systems,approved to 50 watts,lamp by others. dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. ' ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING JOB al'ChK �l�l 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 ' P 626 968 5666 1 F 626369.2695 1 www.aal.net TYPE --- ---_ arealighting CopyrightO2014 Rev9.15 NOTES 1 4 1 ' Type NA AAL UCM-SKB-T4L-32LED-3K-450-BLK-HSS-ETO Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM DIST/SLA4/GS CPA-4-4-4012-10-DX-BLK ' FEATURES (Pole mount) DLC qualified IP66,3G vibration housing Custom lumen packages • Up to 1000'wireless communication. 20kV/10kA surge suppression Integral thermal protection ' Motion sensing up to 40'mounting height 2700-5000K CCT 0-10V dimmable +may Superior BUG ratings >560 nm Amber 13 standard powder coat finishes Types 11, III. IV,V and custom distributions ' SPECIFICATIONS ANGLED HOOD /= ' CONFIGURATION UCM-ANG UCM-WND-ANG UCM-SR-ANG UCM-VSL-ANG UCM-LUM-ANG DIAMETER 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm HEIGHT 14.7'/373mm 20.5'/520mm 20.7'/526mm 20.57521 mm 20.6'/523mm ' WEIGHT 1825 lbs/8.28kq 2175 lbs/9.86k 25 Ibs/1 1.3kq 22.25 lbs/10.1k 24.25 lbs/11k EPA .60 .72 .74 .72 74 BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-BEL UCM-WND-BEL UCM-SR-BEL UCM-VSL-BEL UCM-LUM-BEL ' DIAMETER 24/610mm 247610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 15.8'/401mm 21.4'/543mm 21.6'/549mm 19.37'/492mm 21.5'/546mm WEIGHT 20251bs/92k 2351bs/10.6k 27 lbs/12.25kg 24.25 asll lkq 26 lbs/11.8k EPA 73 .85 .87 .85 .85 1 FLARE HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-FUR UCM-WND-FLR UCM-SR-FLR UCM-VSL-FLR UCM-LUM-FLR DIAMETER 22/559mm 22/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm HEIGHT 14.5/368mm 19.8'/503mm 20.1'/510mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm ' WEIGHT 1&5 lbs/8Ak 21.75 lbs/9.87kg 25.25 lus/10.1 kg 21.75 lbs/9.86k 24.25 lbs/11k EPA .53 .65 .67 .65 .67 y. a � r4 STRAIGHT HOOD 1 ,},,.;3 CONFIGURATION UCM-STR UCM-WND-STR UCM-SR-STR UCM-VSL-STR UCM-LUM-STR ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24/610mm 247610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 14'/355mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm 19.8'/503mm 19.9'/50.5mm WEIGHT 20 lbs/9.07kg 23.25 lbs/10.55k 26.75 lbs/12.13k 23.75 lbs/10.77k 25.75 lbs/11.68k EPA .59 .71 .73 71 .73 SKIRTED BELL HOOD ' CONFIGURATION UCM-SKB UCM-WND-SKB UCM-SR-SKB UCM-VSL-SKB UCM-LUM-SKB DIAMETER 24/610mm 24'/610mm 24/610mm 247610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 19.7/500mm 23.9'/607mm 24.2'/615mm 23.9'/607mm 24.1'/612mm ' WEIGHT 20.5 lbs/9,3kq 23,75 lbs/10.77k 27 lbs/l 2.251kQ 24.25lbs/11k 26.251bs/11.9k EPA .90 1.03 1.05 1.03 ,'(� 1.05 C �� S ' ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ' 01'Ch 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Ind.stry I CA 91745 JOB - - -_ P626.968.5666 I `626369.2695 1 www.aal.nel TYPE arealighting Copyright02014 Rev9.15 NOTES-- 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM I TYPE ' ORDERING INFORMATION , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MODEL Hood Distribution CCT Lumen Package Finish Options Control Voltage Mounting DEL(Must choose one) 4.COLOR TEMPERATURE(Must choose one) 9.VOLTAGE(May choose as noted) ' UCM Universe medium without luminous element I 3K 3000K 1 120-277 VAC input UCM-WND Universe medium with luminous window 4K 4000K 347 347 VAC input UCM-SR Universe medium with luminous solid rings 5K 5000K 480 480 VAC input UCM-VSL Universe medium with luminous vertical slots 27K 2700K' 35K 3500K9.MOUNTING —Must choose one ' UCM-LUM Universe medium with luminous rings AM x560 nm monochromatic amber' POLE MOUNT SLA2 SLA3 2.HOOD S.LUMEN PACKAGE(Must choose one) E SIA4-2 ELF Flared hood 700 I7 wags SLA7 SLA7-2 , 46 s SLA7(5) SLA7(5)-2 FLR-STS Flared hood in natural brushed stainless steel XMA Custom wattage or drive current' SLA8D SLA9 FLR-COP Flared hood in natural brushed copper SLA9-2 SLA10 ANG Angled hood S.FINISH(Must choose one) SLA10-2 SLA16 ANG-STS Angledhoodin naturalbmshedstamlesssteel AWT Arctic While SLA16-2 SLA17 ' ANG-COP An ledhoodin natural brushedcopper SLA17-2 SLA17(5) g FB Black SLA17(5)-2 SLA78 STR Straight hood MTB Matte Black SLA18-2 SLA20 STR-STS Straight hood in natural brushed stainless steel DGN Dark Green SLA20-2 SLA20A STR-COP Straight hood in natural brushedco DBZ Dark Bronze SLA20A-2 SLA20B 9 ➢➢erWRZ SLA208-2 SLA20C REM Bronze Metallic BEL Bell hood Weathered Bronze SLA20C-2 SLA200 ' BRM BEL-STS Bell hood in natural brushed stainless steel VBL Verde Blue SLA200-2 SLA22D BEL-COP Bell hood n natural brushed copper CRT Cotten SLA24 SLA24-2 ' ® Skidedbellhood MAL Matte Aluminum SLA24(5) SLA24(5)-2 TRA4 TRA7 SKB-STS Skirted bell hood in natural brushed stainless MDG Medium Grey TRA7-2 TRA8 steel ATG Antique Green TRAB-2 TRA9 SKB-COP Skirtedbell hood in natural brushedcopper LGY Light Grey TRA9-2 ' RAL Premium Color 3.DISTRIBUTION(Must choose one) CUSTOM"Contact Factory WALL MOUNT MicroCore Precision aimed optics WMA4 WMA5 T2-32LED Type2 7.OPTIONS(May choose as noted) WMA6 WMA8 ' T3-32LED T e3 FTG Flat clear glass lens' WMA9D WMA10 T4-32LED Type4 FLD Flat diffused glass lens' WMA11 WMA12 T5-32LED Type5 SAG Sag clear glass lens' WMA16 WMA17 TX-32LED Custom' HSS House Side shield for Type 4 WMA18 WMA20 SLC Until(luminous)element WMA22D WMA24 ' R80 80 CRI M,,ohm2 WMA37 WMA38 BL Blue inner lens WMA39 ETO modified RD Red inner lens GRN Green inner lens ' left hand distribution. 8. CONTROLS—(May choose as noted) WIR wiScape connectivity 'Contact factory WIRSC wiScapeconnectwily,integral °Note for-AM color temperature , motion sensor 'Not for WIR,WIRSC or SCP control options SCP Integral photo-control and 'Handheld commissioning tool is required to separately motion sensor° configure oradjust any number ofSCPsensors. SCPREMOTE Handheld commissioning tool' FRS-Sj House Side shield ' ^ ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ,---teL M0 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOBamh1 _ arealight rat P626.966.5666 1 F626.369.2695 I www.aal.net TYPE ' I Copyright©2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES— — —_ 1 2 1 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE Opgcal Secontlary ' zSystem o�SAiMtl„ ,.a, a„� °0%+�Ltght Engine .v`" D It°vered: EEOc �i� Del weed Efihety �8na Oelivared mmeaty, BugRatl 9 Cu""irenP*Watts,' e '{: -y`' c��'r LmRens' (ImAv) <,.:gn Luxiens4=Qmlw) a'F" gl Lumens„ jMlw)3 9`,x^6=fat onea)x ': e 54'. #.. TYPE 2 T2-32LED 6186 87 2 0 2 No Lens TYPE 3 T3-32LED 6168 87 1 0 2 ' ' (Standard) TYPE 4 74-32LED 6081 86 1 0 2 K.64W x`91 f1.':'.2 650 71 TYPE 5 T5-32LED 6227 88 3 0 2 `'` ,4N E_� "+ House Side7ypE 4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 4495 63 0 0 2 4768 67 0 0 2 4781 67 0 0 2 MicroCore Shield TYPE2 T2-32LED 1 4607 98 2 0 2 4830 103 2 0 2 4844 101 2 0 2 ' No Lens TYPE 3 T3-32LED 4570 95 1 0 1 4791 100 1 0 2 4805 101 1 0 2 (Standard) TYPE T4-32LED 1 4570 97 1 0 2 4791 102 1 0 2 4805 100 1 0 2 450 47 TYPES TS-32LED 1 4602 98 3 0 1 1 4825 103 3 0 1 4839 101 1 3 1 0 1 1 ' House Side TYPE T432LED-..:HSS 3366 72 0 0 2 3529 75 0 0 2 3539 74 0 0 2 Shield Low : s ua ' ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS ' `p'., , ,'r'rt „• -�, ° r=a7 5yatem 4a e6c a ,F,`=a �a !' ,y E^ �^x� �'*Source cOrrentrbbaulute vokagex,. �Pemnn9UtiQmin9 kR uiof 01gY ren a n0=10 (+)r OEdeHn bode Pax Mln Powar Ddve s�. ge'4 c y Non sx � 3°a*'� ��� "Faa�r°&MA, 7afipeiRayge` 'Aan¢E ::+° u Is�dre?�. ��S u I ?. ElemBnt VAC ,0 ' g . ,,.�.' sr '*" ^Maar ,r. .,,.�: a s° • ss,+3 Without Luminous 700 650 71� 0.6 03 02 0.1 120 Element 450 450 47 277 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.1 MicroCore 32LED 50160 x9 20 -30°C 70.40°C 10%70700% OmA 1mA OmA 1m4 700 650 73 347 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 ' WNDISR/VSLILUM 460 450 450 49 0,4 0.2 0.1 0.1 SENSOR DETECTION RANGE SENS013 MDUNTJNGJIEIG -a'i�:7 20, ,V.``P6' `3be>''1, 0Lv r RAO „ COVERAGE SCP1 20' 1 25 30' 1 35' 40' 1 45' 1 50' 1 62.5' 1 75' 1 87.5' 1 100' 1:2.5 DIAMETER I WIRSC 1 16' 1 20' 24' 1 28' 32' 1 36' 1 40' 1 NA I NIA I NIA I NIA 1 12 LED COLOR 33�"'- �e.""tf✓�v.0idem Go ad ro c-c ; ' CCTAvera e C3000K > 4000K 5000K RI Minimum 70 70 70 SIP Ratio 1.2 1 1.5 1 1.8 Consult factory for Amber,Turtle Friendly,Gulf Coast and Observatory applications. TM-21 LIFETIME CALCULATION ' Optical System Ordering Code Ambient Environment°C Projected Lumen Maintenance(%vs.Khrs) Reported L70 15 25 50 1 60 1 100 15 98 1 98 97 1 96 94 MicroCore- 32LED 25 98 97 96 1 96 1 93 >96Khrs 40 96 95 93 92 1 89 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING - 16555 East Gale Ave. I Cd of Industry I CA 91745 JOB architectural P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 I w .aai.net TYPE — arealighting CopyrightP2014 Rev9.15 NOTES -- 1 3 1 1 Universe" Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' SPECIFICATIONS , HOUSING CONTROLS SERVICING • All housing components shall be die- Wireless enabled fixtures shall support Luminaire shall have tool-less service cast aluminum,sealed with continuous hi-directional radio frequency(RF) access to the gear compartment. Driver , silicone rubber gaskets. communications utilizing IEEE 802.15.4 and surge suppressor shall be mounted • Hood and spacers shall be heavy gauge operating in the 2AGHZ ISM band. to prewired tray with quick disconnects spun aluminum with hemmed edges for thatt may be removed from the gear added rigidity. to wireless range may be compartment. re ' reducedd by by physical obstructions • Luminous rings shall be clear acrylic with between fixtures. an internal lens. ARM MOUNTING • Standard configurations do not require Motion sensor shall be flame retardant,� Luminaire shall be attached to the arm recyclable rec act resistant impact p , y ' a flat lens,optional lenses shall be UV resistantassembly with three stainless steel bolts. tempered glass polycarbonate. The connection shall be sealed with a • All internal and external hardware shall Motion Sensor shall use passive infrared silicone compression gasket. be stainless steel. (PIR)sensing technology that reacts • Post top arms and brackets shall slip • Optical bezel finish shall match the to changes in infrared energy(moving over a 4"/100mm O.D.or a 57127mm as ' luminaire housing. body heat)within the coverage area. configured and secured with six stainless Careful consideration must be given to steel set screws. obstructions that may block the sensor's • Wall mounted arms and brackets shall OPTICAL line of sight. require mounting hardware by others. , • Patent pending MicroCoreTM LED Factory default settings for SCP option modules shall independently aim shall be: FINISH each light emitting diode(LED)in both horizontal rotation and vertical tilt angle. - High mode: 10V Luminaire finish shall consist of a five ' • LEDs shall be mounted to a metal printed - Low mode: 1V stage pretreatment regimen with a circuit board assembly(PCBA)with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off,and uniform conformal coating over the panel - Ramp-up rate:disabled top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. surface and electrical features. - Fade-down rate:disabled , • LED optics shall be clear injection - Photocell:Off Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA molded PMMA acrylic. 605.2 performance specification which Sensitivity:Full includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray • MicroCoren^ PCBA and optic shall be test for corrosion resistance. sealed to a the-cast anodized aluminum - Time Delay:Fade to low:5 minutes ' heat sink with an injection molded Time Delay:Fade to off: 1 hour silicone rubber gasket. IP66. CERTIFICATION • Type 4 distribution with optional House Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for Side Shield not available with clear or PHOTOCELL/EGRESS ADAPTERS outdoor,wet location use,UL1598,UL , diffused glass lenses. Factory installed Ada6750 and Canadian CSA Std.C22.2 House Side Shield is optimized for Type Adapter(s)shall slip over a 4'/100mm no.250. 4 distribution and not recommended for DIA. pole with the luminaire or arm use with Type 2 or 3 distribution and not slipping over the adapter to add a available with type 5 distribution. total of 4.5"/114mm to the overall WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' height. Adapter(s)shall be prewired, OF SALE independently rotatable 359°,and have Download: ELECTRICAL a cast access cover with an integral lens htto//www h ibb.Illiahtina.com/resourcesf warrantard. • Luminaires shall have integral surge and lanyard. , protection that shall be U.L.recognized Photocell adapter shall include an internal and have a surge current rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard twist lock receptacle. Photocell by others. 8/20uSec wave and surge rating of 372J. Egress adapter shall require an auxiliary ' • Drivers shall be U.L recognized with an 120 volt supply for operation of an integral inrush current maximum of<20.0 Amps MR16 lamp in the event of emergency. maximum at 230VAC. The lamp may be aimed and locked into • Drivers shall not be compatible with position with an adjustment range of current sourcing dimmers,consult 150-450. Adapter shall have a socket that ' factory for current list of known accepts miniature bi-pin MR16 lamps up compatible dimming systems,approved to 50 watts,lamp by others. dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. ' ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB ' amhftectural P 626.968.5666 F626.369.2695 I www.aal.net TYPE ----- --- arealighting Copyrght@2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES_ 1 4 1 ' Type P4D AAL UCM-SKB-T4-32LED-3K-700-BLK-HSS/SLA8D Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM /GS CPA-4-4-4012-10-TX (Pole mount double) ' FEATURES DLC qualified IP66,3G vibration housing Custom lumen packages • Up to 1000'wireless communication 20kV/10kA surge suppression Integral thermal protection ' Motion sensing up 10 40'mounting height 2700-5000K CCT 0-10V dimmable Superior.BUG ratings >560 nm Amber 13 standard powder coat finishes Types II,111,IV,V and custom distributions SPECIFICATIONS ANGLED HOOD A, 17x 2�k CONFIGURATION UCM-ANG UCM-WND-ANG UCM-SR-ANG UCM-VSL-ANG UCM-LUM-ANG DIAMETER 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm HEIGHT 14.7'/373mm 20.5'/520mm 20.7'/526mm 20.57521 mm 20.6'/523mm ' WEIGHT 18,25 lbs/8.28kq 21.75 lbs/9.86kq 25 Ibs1l 1.3kq 22.25 lbs/10.lkq 24.25 lbs/l1k EPA .60 72 .74 .72 .74 _ ' 4�. BELL HOOD _ CONFIGURATION UCM-BEL UCM-WND-BEL UCM-SR-BEL UCM-VSL-BEL UCM-LUM-BEL ' DIAMETER 247610mm 20610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 15.8'/401 mm 21.4'/543mm 21.6/549mm 19.37'/492mm 21.5`/546mm WEIGHT 2025 lbs/9.2k 23.51bs/10.6k 27 lbs/12.25kg 24.25 Ites/1 lkg 26 lbs/11.8k EPA .73 .85 .87 .85 .85 A4 FLARE HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-FUR UCM-WND-FUR UCM-SR-FUR UCM-VSL-FLR UCM-L1M-FLR DIAMETER 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm HEIGHT 14.5`/368mm 19.8'/503mm 20.1'/510mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm WEIGHT 18.5 Ibs/8.4kQ 21.75 lbs/M7kq 26.25 lbs/10.1kq 21.75 lbs/9.86k 24.251bs/l 1k ' EPA .53 .65 .67 .65 .67 n > - 1 STRAIGHT HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-STR UCM-WND-STR UCM-SR-STR UCM-VSL-STR UCM-LUM-STR ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 14'/355mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm 19.8'1503mm 19.97505mm WEIGHT 20 lbs/9.07kg 23.25 lbs/10.55kg 26.75 lbs/12.13kq 23.75 lbs/10.77kg 25.751bs/l 1.68kg EPA .59 .71 .73 .71 .73 ta. SKIRTED BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-SKB UCM-WND-SKB UCM-SR-SKB UCM-VSL-SKB UCM-LUM-SKS DIAMETER 24/610mm 24'/610mm 24/610mm 24/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 19.7'/500mm 23.9-/607mm 24.2'/615mm 23.9'/607mm 24.V/612mm WEIGHT 20.5 lbs/9,3kq 23.75 lbs/10.77k 27 lbs/12.25k 24.251bs/l 1 kq 26.251bs/11.9k ' EPA .90 103 1.05 1.03 1.05 C&S ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING JOB - architectural 165556.East Gale Ave. I City of Industry CA 91745 - - _ -A - P 626.968.5666 I F 626.369.2fi95 I www.aal.net TYPE arealighting Copyright 02014 Rev 9.15 NOTES--------- I 1 I Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ORDERING INFORMATION ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MODEL Hood Distribution CCT Lumen Package Finish Options Control Voltage Mounting , 1.MODEL(Must choose one) 4.COLOR TEMPERATURE(Must choose one) 9.VOLTAGE(May choose as noted) ' UCM Universe medium without luminous element 1 3K 30ODK 120-277 VAC input UCM-WND Universe medium with luminous window 4K 4000K 347 347 VAC input UCM-SR Universe medium with luminous solid rings 5K 5000K 480 480 VAC input UCM-VSL Universe medium with luminous vertical slots 27K 2700K' 35K 3500K 9.MOUNTING —Must choose one , UCM-LUM Universe medium with luminous nngs AM >560 nm monochromatic amber' POLE MOUNT SLA2 SLA3 2.HOOD 5.LUMEN PACKAGE(Must choose one) SLA4 FLR Flared hood 700 I7 walls SLA7 SLA7-2 , s SLA7(5) SLA7(5)-2 FLR-STS Flared hood in natural brushed stainless steel XMA Custom wattage or drive current' SLAW SLAB FLR-COP Flaredhood in natural brushed copper SLA9-2 SLA10 ANG Angled hood 6.FINISH(Must choose one) SLA10-2 SLA16 ANG-STS Angledhoodin naturalbrushedstainlesssteel AWT Arctic While SLA1SLA77-2 SLA17 , 7-2 SLA17(5) ANG-COP Angled hood in natural brushed copperBLK Black SLA17(5)-2 SLA18 STR Straight hood MTB Matte Black SLA18-2 SLA20 STR-STS Straight hood in natural brushedslamless steel DGN Dark Green SLA20-2 SLA20A STR-COP Straight hood in natural brushed copper DBZ Dark Bronze SLA20A-2 SLA20B ' BEL Bell hood WRZ WeatheredBmnze SLA20C2 SLA20D BRM Bronze Metallic BEL-STS Bell hood in natural brushed stainless steel VBL Verde Blue SLA20D-2 SLA22D BEL-COP Bell hood n natural brushed copper CRT Cohen SLA24 SLA24-2 ' ® Skidedbellhood MAL Matte Aluminum SLA24(5) SLA24(5)-2 TRATRA7 MDG Medium Grey SKB-STS Skirted bell hood in natural brushed stainless Y TRA7-2 TRAB steel ATG Antique Green TRAB-2 TRA9 SKB-COP Skirted bell hood in natural brushed copper LGY Light Grey TRA9-2 ' RAL Premium Calor 3.DISTRIBUTION(Must choose one) CUSTOM"Contact Factory WALL MOUNT 2 T -32LED 7ype2 WMA4 WMA5 croCore Precision aimed optics 7,OPTIONS(May choose as noted) WMA6 WMAB ' 2-32 T3-32LED Ti e3 FTG Flat clear glass lens' WMA9D WMA10 T4-32LED T e4 FLO Flat diffused glass lens' WMAll WMA12 YP '3 WMA16 WMA17 T5-32LED Type SAG Sag clear glass lens Ypype WMA18 WMA20 TX-32LED Custom' HSS HouseSide element SLC Unlit(luminous)elemenf WMA22D WMA24 ' R80 80 CRI mlmimumWMA37 WMA38 BL Blue inner lens WMA39 RD Red inner lens GRN Green inner lens ' 8. CONTROLS—(May choose as noted) WIR wiScape connectivity 'Contact factory WIRSC wiScapeconneclivity,integral 'Note forAM color temperature ' motion sensor 3 Not for WIR,WIRSC or SCP control options SCP Integral photo-confrhl and 'Handheld commissioning tool is required to separately motion sensor' configure or adjust any number of SCP sensors SCPREMOTE Handheld commissioning tools , t ARCHITECTURAL AREA UGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. City of Intlusiry I CA 91745 JOB architectural P626.968.5666 I F 626.369.2695 I w v aal.net TYPE arealighttng Cenvr ht©2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES 9 1 2 1 t ' Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM TYPE ' LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE y+s-ns T a a -.0 v #h'"n 'iY STs.�': Systawl.?„orSN�eid,r FD,igidbLtfona_ ht Enyin'e 't Dellve d+E`4 p 6V'g.+ Deli eyed Eteey Ti.Bug elNen:d C, Gy Bug'R 11ng Curreld WN Ail- TYPE pTLH'4I�n9 lutnerie."hmlty) pating Lumens' (Imlwj� tn - _?SS+.r ' B,'U. G •7&.'# c-*4r iB iG w>s�xTf"; TYPE2 T2-32LED 6186 87 2 0 2 :sec�';1 No Lens TYPE T3-32LED 6168 87 110 2 V0 + _ 1>ZQ'z� ,6560„n! TyT' ' (Standard) TYPE T4-32LED 6081 86 1 0 2 650 71 TYPE T5-32LED 6227 88 3 0 2 d $ "�� _ As ce `: House Side TYPE T4.32LED-..:HSS 4495 63 0 0 2 4768 67 0 0 2 4781 67 0 0 2 MicroCore Shield TYPE 2 T2-32LED 4607 98 2 0 2 4830 1 103 2 0 2 4844 101 2 0 2 No Lens TYPE T3-32LED 4570 95 1 0 1 4791 1 100 1 0 2 4805 101 1 0 2 (Standard) TYPE 4 T4-32LED 4570 97 1 0 2 4791 102 1 0 2 4805 100 1 0 2 450 47 TYPE T5-32LED 4602 98 3 0 1 4825 103 3 0 1 4839 1 101 3 0 1 ' House Side TYPE 4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 3366 72 0 0 2 3529 75 Shield 0 0 2 3539 74 0 0 2 Lamm ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS -¢w ( ` ' w, System ' r, `� ;kt fi �c4#, y �,";4'"* :..,Source cp'F�entAbsoltkte voig? LED aWe gv*une s�Am `AC�, Mex 0 �'v` autof 0-1U range nD-iDV,ia):. Ortle�ing Code YoDe e t� Mm P`mlrfry{ ,LOpxra`ting , System T �,'da�4gb�, Ye �Noo 9 `,t.< 't''re Factor TMD aTamp.Ranger "KRange fie. ,I vnraw s. T levrjre'9s..a mA -a+t , �,t� tri%)` c. rx Mm"7 3 Maz . ♦wU� - ` 4' s.......r at ,VAfi 4fii 12b.:277 34T r4BR , a� ..1c "-a �t�, 'a,.$z .. ' Without Luminous 700 650 71 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 Element 450 450 47 2707 0.4 02 01 0.1 MicroCore 32LED 50160 x9 20 -30°CTO+40°C 10%TO100% OmA 1mA )MA IMA 700 650 73 347 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 ' WNDISRIVSLILUM480 49 450 450 0.4 0.2 0.1 01 SENSOR DETECTION RANGE kSE SO TING EIGHTS x--RAIRO& COVERAGE SCP1 20' 1 25' 30 35' 1 40 45' 1 S0 1 62.5' 1 75' 1 87.5 100 1.2.5 DIAMETER I WIRSC 1 16' 1 20' 24' 1 28' 1 32' 36 1 40' 1 NIA I NIA I NIA I NIA 1'.2 ' LED COLOR - O7"deHlr CodeE�i.' rAb3'1rM' '. ups-,3159 t+�`i.. 9K .. r ' F­CCT e 3000K 4000K 5000K CRI Minimum 70 70 70 SIP Ratio 1.2 1.5 1.8 Consult factory for Amber,Turtle Friendly,Gulf Coast and Observatory applications. ' TM-21 LIFETIME CALCULATION ' Optical System Ordering Code Ambient Environment'C projected Lumen Maintenance(%vs.III Reported L7o 15 25 50 60 100 15 98 98 97 96 1 94 MicroCore 32LED 25 98 97 96 96 1 93 1 A61(hrs 40 96 95 93 92 89 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ' 1626.East Gale Ave. I Cityet o695 1 try I C l.net TOB _ — ae't:hitectural P 626.968.5666 I F 626.369.2695 I vnvw.aal.net TYPE — arealighting Copyrght©2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES--___ — 13 I Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM TYPE ' SPECIFICATIONS t HOUSING CONTROLS SERVICING • All housing components shall be die- Wireless enabled fixtures shall support Luminaire shall have tool-less service cast aluminum,sealed with continuous bi-directional radio frequency(RF) access to the gear compartment. Driver ' silicone rubber gaskets. communications utilizing IEEE 802.15.4 and surge suppressor shall be mounted • Hood and spacers shall be heavy gauge operating in the 2.4GHZ ISM band. to prewired tray with quick disconnects spun aluminum with hemmed edges for thatt may be removed from the gear added rigidity. to wireless range may be compartment. re t reducedd by by physical obstructions • Luminous rings shall be clear acrylic with between fixtures. an internal lens. ARM MOUNTING • Standard configurations do not require Motion sensor shall be flame retardant, Luminaire shall be attached to the arm recyclable rec act resistant impact p , y ' a flat lens,optional lenses shall be UV resistantassembly with three stainless steel bolts. tempered glass polycarbonate. The connection shall be sealed with a • All internal and external hardware shall Motion Sensor shall use passive infrared silicone compression gasket. be stainless steel. (PIR)sensing technology that reacts • Post top arms and brackets shall slip • Optical bezel finish shall match the to changes in infrared energy(moving over a 47100mm O.D.or a 57127mm as , luminaire housing. body heat)within the coverage area. configured and secured with six stainless Careful consideration must be given to steel set screws. obstructions that may block the sensor's . Wall mounted arms and brackets shall OPTICAL line of sight. require mounting hardware by others. ' • Patent pending MicroCoreT"LED Factory default settings for SCP option modules shall independently aim shall be: FINISH each light emitting diode(LED)in both horizontal rotation and vertical tilt angle. - High mode: 1OV Luminaire finish shall consist of a five ' • LEDs shall be mounted to a metal printed - Low mode: 1V stage pretreatment regimen with a circuit board assembly(PCBA)with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off,and uniform conformal coating over the panel - Ramp-up rate:disabled top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. surface and electrical features. - Fade-down rate:disabled ' • LED optics shall be clear injection - Photocell:Off Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA molded PMMA acrylic. 605.2 performance specification which Sensitivity:Full includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray • MicroCoreT"PCBA and optic shall be test for corrosion resistance. sealed to a die-cast anodized aluminum - Time Delay:Fade to low:5 minutes ' heat sink with an injection molded Time Delay:Fade to off: 1 hour silicone rubber gasket.IP66. CERTIFICATION • Type 4 distribution with optional House • Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for Side Shield not available with clear or PHOTOCELL/EGRESS ADAPTERS outdoor,wet location use,U1_1598, UL ' diffused glass lenses. Factory installed8750 and Canadian CSA Std.C22.2 House Side Shield is optimized for Type Adapters)shall slip over a 4'/100mm no.250. 4 distribution and not recommended for DIA.pole with the luminaire or arm use with Type 2 or 3 distribution and not slipping over the adapter to add a available with type 5 distribution. total of 4.57114mm to the overall WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' height. Adapter(s)shall be prewired, OF SALE independently rotatable 359',and have Download: ELECTRICAL a cast access cover with an integral lens htto I/www.hubbeliliciblioa.com/resources/ • Luminaires shall have integral surge and lanyard. warranty/ protection that shall be U.L.recognized Photocell adapter shall include an internal ' and have a surge current rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard twist lock receptacle. Photocell by others. 8/20uSec wave and surge rating of 372J. Egress adapter shall require an auxiliary ' • Drivers shall be U.L recognized with an 120 volt supply for operation of an integral inrush current maximum of<20.0 Amps MR16 lamp in the event of emergency. maximum at 230VAC. The lamp may be aimed and locked into • Drivers shall not be compatible with position with an adjustment range of current sourcing dimmers,consult 15°-45°. Adapter shall have a socket that ' factory for current list of known accepts miniature bi-pin MR16 lamps up compatible dimming systems,approved to 50 watts,lamp by others. dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. ' ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING JOB 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 ' a bfi tur l P626.968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I w .aal.net TYPE g 9 Copyright 0 2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES—__-- 1 4 1 ' Type P5 AAL UCM-SKB-T5-3/4-32LED-3K-700-ET0 Dist. Universe' Collection Medium LED - UCM BLK/SLA4/GS CPA-4-4-4012-10-TX (Pole mount) 1 FEATURES DLC qualified IP66,3G vibration housing Custom lumen packages • Up to 1000'wireless communication 20kV/10kA surge suppression Integral thermal protection 1 Motion sensing up 10 40'mounting height 2700-5000K CCT 0-10V dimmable a Superior BUG ratings >560 nm Amber 13 standard powder coat finishes Types II, III, IV,V and custom distributions 1 SPECIFICATIONS 1 ANGLED HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-ANG UCM-WND-ANG UCM-SR-ANG UCM-VSL-ANG UCM-LUM-ANG DIAMETER 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 207508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm HEIGHT 14.7'/373mm 20.5'/520mm 20.7'/526mm 20.5'/521mm 20.6/523mm 1 WEIGHT 18.25 lbs/8.28kg 21751 bs/9.86kg 25 lbs/11.31<q 22.251bs/10.1kq 24.25 lbs/11kq EPA .60 .72 .74 .72 .74 1 Ar p r BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-BEL UCM-WND-BEL UCM-SR-BEL UCM-VSL-BEL UCM-LUM-BEL 1 DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 15.8'/401mm 21.47543mm 21.6'I549mm 19.37'/492mm 21.5/546mm WEIGHT 20.251bs/9.2k 23.51bs/10.6k 27 lbs/12.25k 24,25 lbs/1 1 k_q 261bs/11.8k EPA .73 .85 .87 .85 .85 ' 1 4 1 FLARE HOOD .. CONFIGURATION UCM-FLR UCM-WND-FLR UCM-SR-FLR UCM-VSL-FLR UCM-LUM-FLR DIAMETER 22'/559mm 22'1559mm 22'I559mm 22y559mm 22'/559mm HEIGHT 14.5'/368mm 19.8'/503mm 20.1'/510mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm WEIGHT 18.51bs/8.4kg 2175 lbs/9.87kq 25.251bs/10.1kq 21.75 lbs/9.86kq 24.25 lbs/11 kg 1 EPA .53 .65 .67 .65 .67 *F 1 STRAIGHT HOOD '��`"'"';:.. `�xn:.. `� : 6.": •-��'`,h•.... CONFIGURATION UCM-STP UCM-WND-STR UCM-SR-STR UCM-VSL-STR UCM-LUM-STR 1 DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 247610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 14'/355mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/5o8mm 19.8'/503mm 19.9'/505mm WEIGHT 20 lbs/9.07kq 23.25 lbs/10.55k 26,75)bs/12.13k_Q 23.75ball 0.77k 25.75 lbs/11.68k EPA .59 .71 .73 .71 .73 1 A P1711 1 SKIRTED BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-SKB UCM-WND-SKB UCM-SR-SKB UCM-VSL-SKB UCM-LUM-SKS DIAMETER 247610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 19.7'/500mm 23.9'/607mm 24.2/615mm 23.9'/607mm 24.1'/612mm WEIGHT 20.5 lbs/9.3kg 23.75 lbs/10.77k 27 lbs/12.25k 24.251bs/1 I kq 26.25 lbs/11.9k 1 EPA .90 1.03 L05 1.03 1.05 c&us r 1` ^ ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 1 afl:I11[�GOI '� 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB - P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net TYPE - arealighting Copyright©2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES-_--- 1 I 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM I TYPE , ORDERING INFORMATION , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 MODEL Hood Distribution CCT Lumen Package Finish Options Control Voltage Mounting ' DEL(Must choose one) 4.COLOR TEMPERATURE(Must choose one) 9.VOLTAGE(May choose as noted) t UCM Universe medium without luminous element I 3K 30ODK 120-277 VAC input UCM-WND Universe medium with luminous window 4K 4060K 347 347VACinpul UCM-SR Universe medium with luminous solid rings 5K 5000K 480 480 VAC input UCM-VSL Universe medium with luminous vertical slots 27K 2700K' , 35K 3500K 9.MOUNTING —Must choose one UCM-1-UM Universe medium with luminous rings AM >560 nm monochromatic amber' POLE MOUNT SLA2 SLA3 2.HOOD S.LUMEN PACKAGE(Must choose one) SL44-2 FLR Flared hood7500071watts SLA7 SLA7-2 ' 48 wafts SLA7(5) SLA7(5)-Z FLR-STS Flared hood in natural brushedstainless steel XMA Custom wattage or drive current' SLA8D SLA9 FLR-COP Flared hood in natural brushed copper SLA9-2 SLA10 ANG Angled hood 6.FINISH(Must choose one) SLA10-2 SLA16 ANG-STS Angled hood in natural brushed stainless steel AWT Arctic White SLA16-2 SLA17 ' SLA17-2 SLA17(5) ANG-COP Angled hood in natural brushed copper BLK Black SLA17(5)-2 SLAIB STR Straight hood MTB Matte Black SLA18-2 SLA20 STR-STS Straight hood in natural brushed stainless steel DGN Dark Green SLA20-2 SLA20A ' STR-COP Straight hood in natural brushed copper DBZ Dark Bronze SLA20A-2 SLA20B BEL Bell hood BRIM Weathered Bronze SLA20C2 SLA200 BM Bronze Metallic BEL-STS Bell hood in natural brushed stainless steel VBL Verde Blue SLA20D-2 SLA22D BEL-COP Bell hood n natural brushed copper CRT Conan SLA24 SLA24-2 , ® Skirted bell hood MAL Matte Aluminum SLA24(5) SLA24(5)-2 TRA4 TRA7 SKB-STS Skirted bell hood in natural brushed stainless MDG Medium Grey TRA7-2 TRAB steel ATG Antique Green - TRA8-2 TRA9 SKB-COP Skirted bell hood in natural brushed copper LGY Light Grey TRA9-2 ' RAL Premium Color 3.DISTRIBUTION(Must choose one) CUSTOM"Contact Factory WALL MOUNT MicroCore Precision aimed optics W MA4 WMA5 T2-32LED Type 7.OPTIONS(May choose as noted) WMA6 WMA8 ' T3-32LED Type FTG Flat clear glass lens' WMA9D WMA10 T4-32LED T e4 FLD Flat diltusedglass lens' WMA-11 WMA12 SAG Sag clearglasslens" WMA16 WMA17 TS-32LED Types ype 4 WMA18 WMA20 HSS House uminous)eld for m element - us om WMA22D WMA24 ' SLC 80 CR/mumus)elemenf R80 80 CRI mimimum2 WMA37 WMA38 BL Blue inner lens WMA39 RD Red inner lens GRN Green inner lens ' ETO modified distribution 3/4 type 5. B. CONTROLS-(May choose as noted) W I R wiScape connectivity 'Contact factory WIRSC wiScape connectivity,integral 'Note forAMcolorlemperature , motion sensor 3 Not for WIR,WIRSC or SCP control options SCP Integral photo-control and 'Handheld commissioning tool is required to separately motion sensor' configure or adjust any number of SCP sensors. SCPREMOTE Handheld commissioning tool° ' ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB ' areali�ghting P626.968.56661 F626.369.2695 I www.aal.net TYPE NOTES — Copyright©2014 Rev 9.15 I 2 I ' Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM TYPE ' LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE 4 bplmel rDtrreyYem ' Sgstema7 SMeld - i4gM + .r_ jLrv*k,U ksAst -",A. Enm «r,`�`DlelWee�nesd•dElflBmciawVy)^ gMh g, DLeuGmvee7neadl,Eftrygntpayc) yAa A �Dleuliveernesd:"�ET(Ifmicehvcy'�i` no u(mrrae)nt .rmGigev fe 'v" �i TYPE T2-32LED 6186 87 210j, t 0 `L $579 No Lens TYPE T332LED 6168 87 1 0 'fi'Q +{3. `_ ' (Standard) TYPE 4 T4-32LED 6081 86 1110 2 6,4 Tf- -.. X91 °� D'.-RY ,6dfii' r w ' 650 7t TYPE 5 T5-32LED 6227 88 1310 2 "6505 ` 3 ' '�2$..'r '- House Side TYPE 4 T4-32LED,.:HSS 4495 63 0 0 2 4768 67 0 0 2 4781 67 0 0" 2 MicroCore Shield ' TYPE 2 T2-32LED 4607 98 2 0 2 4830 103 2 0 2 4844 101 2 0 2 NoLens TYPE T3-32LED 4570 95 7 0 1 x791 100 1 0 2 4605 101 1 0 2 (Slantlard) TYPE T4-32LED 4570 97 1 0 2 4791 102 1 0 2 4805 100 1 0 2 450 47 TYPE T5-32LED 4602 98 3 0 1 4825 103 3 0 1 4839 101 3 0 1 ' House Side TYPE T4.32LED-..-HSS 3366 72 0 0 2 3529 75 0 0 2 3539 74 0 0 2 Shield tgr4 9,; s :I yr . ' ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS h sue `'t "kit�tS'�+ a"y " r r+°- 2DnvaC c:-zv'a5" 'kv3{tliPi>v;»f''c.:+ ma'e'u rT'}„c+�r bDtmml Yt' �k' Sy61em tane” K :t^2 xNe ''tty c� : 'S6aroa current AbsoA4te sYal;�ge' aOpLdal"{ 'Yn"K '2 'IED v`Wada 3 'rtx pD` aX x MazF zE y"'I^A 'A """YY Ncut of O'104 v rap&B WrY1.1G (e):. Ditlering�GA a p8 Mih Power Operetmg" yDDnttnttg 5'y4tem off .', r-- inveT„ ,Voltage a d�s a >h THD r u x x a +' w ,g LalloA ` ,=a . f,', Fallor r a s a Temp Range `"13m1 -" Wire R S �/F'.� ' Without Luminous 700 650 71 0.610.3J0,20.1Element 120450 450 47 217 O.d 0.2MicroCore 32LED SOIfiO z.9 20 -30°C70.40°C 10%70100% Om4 1mA OmA 1mH 700 650 73 347 O6 0.3WND/SRIVBLILUM 4W450 450 49 0.4 0.2 SENSOR DETECTION RANGE ' `1€+':. MOl1NT.I9 HEIGHT 4 ;3::F ETA !,W44% '� .rt c,,8_* a �12 , 187ra`;---r 20' 3Q' + i 40 a v - AT010, '� COVERAGE SCP 20' 25' 30 35' 40 45' 50 625' 75' 87.5' 100' 12.5 DIAMETER WIRSC 1 16' 1 20' 1 24' 1 28' 1 32' 1 36' 1 40' 1 NA I NIA I NIA I NIA 1 12 ' LED COLOR ' CCT Avera a 3000K 4000K -5000K CRIMinimum 70 70 70 SIP Ratio 1.2 1 15 1 1.8 Consult factory for Amber,Turtle Friendly,Gulf Coast and Observatory applications. ' TM-21 LIFETIME CALCULATION Optical System Ordering Code Ambient Environment'C projected Lumen Maintenance(%vs.Khrs) Reported L70 15 25 50 60 100 15 98 98 97 96 94 MicroCore 32LED 25 98 97 96 96 93 196Khrs ' 40 96 95 93 92 89 ® ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ' 8i'Ch� 1�_' 16555 East Gale Ave. 1 City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB — archRect rating P626.968,5666 1 F626.369.2695 1 w .aal.net TYPE Copyright02014 Rev9.15 NOTES------------- 1 3 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' SPECIFICATIONS ' HOUSING CONTROLS SERVICING • All housing components shall be die- Wireless enabled fixtures shall support Luminaire shall have tool-less service cast aluminum, sealed with continuous bi-directional radio frequency(RF) access to the gear compartment. Driver ' silicone rubber gaskets. communications utilizing IEEE 802.15.4 and surge suppressor shall be mounted • Hood and spacers shall be heavy gauge operating in the 2.4GHZ ISM band. to prewired tray with quick disconnects spun aluminum with hemmed edges for thatt may be removed from the gear added rigidity. to wireless range may be compartment. re t retluced by by physical obstructions • Luminous rings shall be clear acrylic with between fixtures. an internal lens. ARM MOUNTING • Standard configurations do not require Motion sensor shall be flame retardant, Luminaire shall be attached to the arm , , p , y a flat lens,.optional lenses shall be UV resistantimpact resistantrecyclable assembly with three stainless steel bolts. tempered glass polycarbonate. The connection shall be sealed with a • All internal and external hardware shall Motion Sensor shall use passive infrared silicone compression gasket. be stainless steel. (PIR)sensing technology that reacts • Post top arms and brackets shall slip • Optical bezel finish shall match the to changes in infrared energy(moving over a 4"/100mm O.D.or a 5'7127mm as ' luminaire housing. body heat)within the coverage area. configured and secured with six stainless Careful consideration must be given to steel set screws. obstructions that may block the sensor's • Wall mounted arms and brackets shall OPTICAL line of sight. require mounting hardware by others. ' • Patent pending MicroCoreT"LED Factory default settings for SCP option modules shall independently aim shall be: FINISH each light emitting diode(LED)in both horizontal rotation and vertical tilt angle. - High mode: 10V Luminaire finish shall consist of a five ' • LEDs shall be mounted metal printed - Low mode: 1 V stage pretreatment regimen with a to a m circuit board assembly to a m with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off,and uniform conformal coating over the panel - Ramp-up rate:disabled top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. surface and electrical features. - Fade-down rate:disabled ' • LED optics shall be clear injection - Photocell:Off Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA molded PMMA acrylic. 605.2 performance specification which Sensitivity:Full includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray • MicroCoreT-PCBA and optic shall be test for corrosion resistance. sealed to a die-cast anodized aluminum - Time Delay:Fade to low:5 minutes ' heat sink with an injection molded Time Delay:Fade to off: 1 hour silicone rubber gasket. IP66. CERTIFICATION • Type 4 distribution with optional House • Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for Side Shield not available with clear or PHOTOCELL/EGRESS ADAPTERS outdoor,wet location use,UL1598,UL ' diffused glass lenses. Factory installed 8750 and Canadian CSA Std.C22.2 House Side Shield is optimized for Type Adapter(s)shall slip over a 4'/t00mm no.250. 4 distribution and not recommended for DIA,pole with the luminaire or arm use with Type 2 or 3 distribution and not slipping over the adapter to add a available with type 5 distribution, total of 4.5'7114mm to the overall WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' height. Adapter(s)shall be prewired, OF SALE independently rotatable 359°,and have Download: ELECTRICAL a cast access cover with an integral lens htto//www hubbellliahtinc com/resources/ • Luminaires shall have integral surge and lanyard. warrant protection that shall be U.L.recognized Photocell adapter shall include an internal ' and have a surge current rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard twist lock receptacle. Photocell by others. 8/20uSec wave and surge rating of 372J. Egress adapter shall require an auxiliary ' • Drivers shall be U.L recognized with an 120 volt supply for operation of an integral inrush current maximum of<20.0 Amps MR16 lamp in the event of emergency. maximum at 230VAC. The lamp may be aimed and locked into • Drivers shall not be compatible with position with an adjustment range of current sourcing dimmers,consult 150-450. Adapter shall have a socket that ' factory for current list of known accepts miniature bi-pin MR16 lamps up compatible dimming systems,approved to 50 watts,lamp by others. dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. ' ® ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING JOB archhOtectu al 16555 East Gale Ave. City of In,7ustry I CA 91145 ' P.626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net TYPE arealighting Copyright©2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES------------ 1 4 1 ' Type P6 AAL UCM-SKB-T3-32LED-3K-700-BLK/SLA8D/GS Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM CPA-4-4-4012-10-TX FEATURES (Pole mount) DLC qualified IP66,3G vibration housing Custom lumen packages • Up to 1000'wireless communication 20kV/10kA surge suppression Integral thermal protection • Motion sensing up to 40'mounting height 2700-5000K CCT 0-10V dimmable Superior BUG ratings >560 not Amber 13 standard powder coat finishes Types II, III,IV,V and custom distributions II. ' SPECIFICATIONS r ANGLED HOOD ' CONFIGURATION UCM-ANG UCM-WND-ANG UCM-SR-ANG UCM-VSL-ANG UCM-LUM-ANG DIAMETER 207508mm 20'/508mm 20'1508mm 207508mm 20'/508mm HEIGHT 14.7'/373mm 20.5'1520mm 20.7'/526mm 20.5'/521mm 20.6'/523mm ' WEIGHT 1825 lbs/8.26kq 21.75 lbs/9.86k 25 IbS/1 1.3kg 22.25 Ibs/10.1kQ 24.251bs/11k EPA .60 72 .74 ,72 74 sy BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-BEL UCM-WND-BEL UCM-SR-BEL UCM-VSL-BEL UCM-LUM-BEL ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'I610mm 24'/610mm 24.1610MM HEIGHT 15.8'/401mm 21A'/543mm 21.6'/549mm 19.37'/492mm 21.57546mm WEIGHT 2025 lbs/9.2kg 23.5 lbs/10.6k 27 lbs/1225k 24,25 Ibs/1 lkg 26 lbs/11.8k EPA 73 .85 .87 .85 .85 1 FLARE HOOD A +4`-',-'''°i;:. ' CONFIGURATION UCM-FLR UCM-WND-FIR UCM-SR-FLR UCM-VSL-FLR UCM-LUM-FLA DIAMETER 22y559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'1559mm 22'/559mm HEIGHT 14.5/368mm 19.8'1503mm 20.17510mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm ' WEIGHT 18.5 lbs/8.4kci 21.75 Ibs/9.87kQ 25.25 Ibs/10.1 kq 2176 Ls/9.86kq 24,251bs111k EPA .53 .65 .67 .65 .67 7-7 �4 1 STRAIGHT HOOD �:x''>•_ `'ra'x' '� r.'�;: w'� .. CONFIGURATION UCM-STR UCM-WND-STR UCM-SR-STR UCM-VSL-STR UCM-LUM-STR ' DIAMETER 24/610mm 24/610mm 24'1610mm 24'/610mm 24/610mm HEIGHT 14'1355mm 19.8'/503mm 207508mm 19.8'1503mm 19.9'/505mm WEIGHT 20 lbs/9.07kg 2325 lbs/10.55k 26.75 lbs/12.13k 23.75 lbs/10.77k 25.751bs/11.68kci EPA .59 .71 .73 .71 .73 ' SKIRTED BELL HOOD b CONFIGURATION UCM-SKB UCM-WND-SKB UCM-SR-SKB UCM-VSL-SKB UCM-LUM-SKB DIAMETER 24'/610mm 247610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 19.7'/500mm 23.9'/607mm 24.2'/615mm 23.9'/607mm 24.1'/612mm WEIGHT 20.5 lbs/9.3kQ 23.751bs/10.77k 27 lbs/12.25kq 24.25 lbs11 Ikg 26.251bs/1 I.9k EPA .90 1.03 1.05 1.03 1.05 ceus ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB _ amhRectural P 626.968.5666 I F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net TYPE arealighting Cbpynght©2014 Rev9.15 NOTES-------- I 1 I 1 Universe"" Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' ORDERING INFORMATION ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MODEL Hood Distribution CCT Lumen Package Finish Options Control Voltage Mounting ' 1. DEL(Must choose one) 4.COLOR TEMPERATURE(Must choose one) 9.VOLTAGE(May choose as noted) ' UCM Universe medium without luminous element 1 3 K 3000K 120-277VACinpuf UCM-WND Universe medium with luminous window 4K 4000K 347 347 VAC input UCM-SR Universe medium with luminous solid rings 5K 5000K 480 480 VAC input UCM-VSL Universe medium with luminous vertical slots 27K 2700K' ' 35K 3500K9.MOUNTING —Must choose one UCM-LUM Universe medium with luminous nngs AM >560 not monochromatic amber' POLE MOUNT SLA2 SLA3 2.HOOD 5.LUMEN PACKAGE(Must choose one) SLA4-2 FLR Flared hood 700 Ilwatts SLA7 SLA7-2 ' Qf was SLA7(5) S(A7(5) FLR-STS Flared hood in natural brushed stainless steel XMA Custom wattage or drive current' SLA8D SLA9 FLR-COP Flared hood in natural brushed copper SLA9-2 SLA10 ANG Angled hood 6.FINISH(Must choose one) SLA-10-2 SLA16 ' ANG-STS Angledhoodin natural brushed stainless steel AWT Arctic White SLA16-2 SLA17 ANG-COP An ledhoodin naturalbrushedco Per BLK Black SLA17-2 SLA17(5) SLA17(5)-2 SLA18 STR Straight hood MTB Matte Black SLA18-2 SLA20 STR-STS Straight hood in natural brushed stainless steel DGN Dark Green SLA20-2 SLA20A ' STR-COP Straight hood in natural brushedcopper DBZ Dark Bronze SLA20A-2 SLA20B BEL Bell hood WRZ Weathered Bronze SLA20C2 SLA20D BRM Bronze Metallic BEL-STS Bell hood in natural brushed stainless steel VBL Verde Blue SLA20D-2 SLA22D BEL-COP Bell hoodn natural brushed copper CRT Cotten SLA24 SLA24-2 ' ® Skirted bell hood MAL Matte Aluminum SLA24(5) SLA24(5)-2 TRA4 TRA7 SKB-STS Skirled bell hood in natural brushed stainless MDG Medium Grey TRA7-2 TRA8 steel ATG Antique Green TRA8-2 TRA9 SKB-COP .Skirted bell hood in natural brushed copper LGY Light Grey TRA9-2 ' RAL Premium Color 3.DISTRIBUTION(Must choose one) CUSTOM"Contac!Factory WALL MOUNT MicroCore Precision aimed optics WMA4 WMA5 T2-32LEDD 7 e2 7.OPTIONS(May choose as noted) WMA6 WMAB ' T3-32LEType FTG Flat clearglass lens' WMA9D WMA10 4-32LED ype FLD Flat diffused glass lens' WMA76 WMA17 T5-32LED Type SAG Sagclearglasslens YP WMA18 WMA20 TX-32LED Custom' HSS House element ' SLC Unlit(luminous)element WMA22D WMA24 R80 80 CRI MmuMUm> WMA37 WMA38 BL Blue inner lens WMA39 RD Red inner lens GRN Green innerfens ' 6. CONTROLS—(May choose as noted) WIR wiScape connectivity 'Contact factory WIRSC wiScape connechvily,integral 1 Note for AM color temperature ' motion sensor 3 Not for WIR,WIRSC or SCP control options SCP Integralphoto-confmland 'Handheld commissioning tool is required to separately motion sensor configure or adjust any number of SCP sensors. SCPREMOTE Handheld commissioning tool' , ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING arCO1�tCCtl11'a� 16555 East Gale Ave. I City o1 Industry I CA 91745 JOB arChRect rat P626.968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I vrv✓w.aal.net TYPE Copyright©2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES—_— —. 1 2 1 ' Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM TYPE LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE :307 a'?C K.3'+a .s 4K m, a Opdcal gcDndary LBn , 14 r axz-'€, *'' m F'+xdrw k Bug ' <Cy�srtem fSTor Sluetd�A;y �s,°„eb� vLlght F-ngm6 Delivered` Efficacy Delivered EBCc� - Delivered Efieepy ug'Retin'g gCu�rent.-WaVa; YTc" o- � ` Luens{c(� Rating Comets hn7wAaang Lumens$ m`51 "r` TYPE 2 T2-32LED 6186 87 2 0 2 '.,: Z v' ••^ ' No Lens TYPE 3 T3-32LED 6168 87 1 0 2 -,,,r 9 . ' '0' 34fi . 4 '0 (Standard) TYPE T4-32LED 6081 86 1 0 2 &a-�._ n £AH`^ 14` A• 650 71 TYPES T5-32LED 6227 88 3 House Side TYPE 4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 4495 63 0 0 2 4768 67 0 0 2 4781 67 0 0 2 MicraCore Shield TYPE T2-32LED 4607 98 2 0 2 4830 103 2 0 2 4844 101 2 0 2 NO Lens TYPE T3-32LED 4570 95 1 0 1 4791 100 1 0 2 4805 101 1 0 2 (Standard) TYPE T4-32LED 4570 97 1 0 2 4791 102 1 0 2 4805 100 1 0 2 450 47 TYPE T5-32LED 4602 98 3 0 1 4825 103 3 0 1 4839 101 3 0 1 ' House Side TYPE T4-32LED-..:HSS 3366 72 0 0 2 3529 75 0 0 2 3539 74 0 0 2 Shield ' ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS i,`�w+ g «' 'C5b 2n' zr qx oty. ra%Y)ypd' ,leo Driver , `1,i't: s Dmmil zFWf�tY3" ' ' z'# �` ` <�5>rm�w n " �^ 6T "at• a; °*` "' S�Dr6e curtent` Ab'§otoxe v01ta e'f) ' r Cry Y a�m r� A� ' tP•'' Mai °+- t. t otv010V7`a Kran on 0 tOV(i}'. 0 ea13 L Lme v )r Ordexmg Code l, � .Vblm erAy P MIn Poker? r, Opexatmg. D1mmi0g v ,YSYstem o- .�`F+.}4.v Drive a`'+f z 9} r Ya THD ; r u Ie wire` •+ ` le wGe. :. T rzy'°1 qq t r d` •t,JJOn f, . f fi ' � x n FaMOr TEm Rebg6 t aRerge r w^„ $ -. g, 4. - ,° '1n.$ Aa EIert,I��t VAC FHZ%•120277 8§0 480 ���x^^T+ >.,nr (9`0) ' a$n. «.. 4k ":rx�.�Ya,i,�a rxY"x .'` „MIn Max h41nv ' Without Luminous 700 650 71 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 120 Element 450 450 47 277 0.4 0.2 0.1 01 MicraCore 32LED 50160 z.9 20 -30°C TO+40°C 10%T0100% OMA 1mA :LlMA 700 650 73 347 0 6 0.3 0.2 0.2 ' WNDISRIVSLILUM 480 450 450 49 0.4 02 0.1 0.1 SENSOR DETECTION RANGE a�" 4°J.,,'"v`'�si3kn w,.�9HMOUNTINOHEIG11T3w':i .`�''1,w:A=W" s, /1` {,y'figt6 , E18.fI i '.2Ds4+w' 25.3 X30 ..$6` 34tkrRATIO COVERAGE SCP 20' 25' ,1 30' 35 40' ° 45' 1 50' 1 62.5' 1 75' 1 US 1 100' 1 12.5 DIAMETER I WIRSC 1 16' 1 20' 1 24' 28' 32' 36' 1 40' 1 NIA I N/A I N/A I NIA I12 ' LED COLOR 4`;~••••3;Ey, ''t, .Ortlerl d6.' :_ "3». CCTAvera e 3000K 4000K 5000K CRI Minimum 70 70 70 SIP Ratio 1.2 t5 1,8 ' Consult factory for Amber,Turtle Friendly.Gulf Coast and Observatory applications. TM-21 LIFETIME CALCULATION ' Optical System Ordering Code Ambient Environment*C Projected Lumen Maintenance,(%vs.Khri Reported L70 15 25 50 60 100 15 98 96 97 96 94 Microcore 32LED 25 98 97 96 9693 >96Khrs ' 40 96 95 93 92 89 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ! ' 81Y�1 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Intluotry I CA 91745 JOB arealight cal 1`626.968.5666 I F6263w69.2695 I .aal.nel NOTES Copyright�2014 Rev 9.15 1 3 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE , SPECIFICATIONS ' HOUSING CONTROLS SERVICING • All housing components shall be die- Wireless enabled fixtures shall support • Luminaire shall have tool-less service , cast aluminum,sealed with continuous bi-directional radio frequency(RE) access to the gear compartment. Driver silicone rubber gaskets. communications utilizing IEEE 802.15.4 and surge suppressor shall be mounted • Hood and spacers shall be heavy gauge operating in the 2.4GHZ ISM band. to prewired tray with quick disconnects spun aluminum with hemmed edges for thatt may be removed from the gear added rigidity. to wireless range may be compartment. re ' reducedd by by physical obstructions • Luminous rings shall be clear acrylic with between fixtures, an internal lens. ARM MOUNTING • Standard configurations do not require Motion sensor shall be flame retardant, Luminaire shall be attached to the arm ' recyclable impact resistant,, a flat lens,optional lenses shall be UV resistantassembly with three stainless steel bolts. tempered glass polycarbonate. The connection shall be sealed with a • All internal and external hardware shall Motion Sensor shall use passive infrared silicone compression gasket. be stainless steel. (PIR)sensing technology that reacts • Post top arms and brackets shall slip • Optical bezel finish shall match the to changes in infrared energy(moving over a 4°/100mm O.D.or a 5"/127mm as ' luminaire housing. body heat)within the coverage area, configured and secured with six stainless Careful consideration must be given to steel set screws. obstructions that may block the sensor's • Wall mounted arms and brackets shall OPTICAL line of sight. require mounting hardware by others. ' • Patent pending MicroCorelm LED Factory default settings for SCP option modules shall independently aim shall be: FINISH each light emitting diode(LED)in both horizontal rotation and vertical tilt angle. - High mode: 10V Luminaire finish shall consist of a five , • LEDs shall be mounted to a metal printed - Low mode: IV stage pretreatment regimen with a circuit board assembly(PCBA)with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off,and - Ramp-up rate:disabled top coated with a thermoset super TGIC uniform conformal coating over the panel Polyester powder coat finish. surface and electrical features. - Fade-down rate:disabled ' • LED optics shall be clear injection - Photocell:Oft Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA molded PMMA acrylic. 605.2 performance specification which Sensitivity: Full includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray • MicroCorel-PCBA and optic shall be test for corrosion resistance. sealed to a die-cast anodized aluminum - Time Delay:Fade to low:5 minutes ' heat sink with an injection molded Time Delay Fade to off: 1 hour silicone rubber gasket. IP66. CERTIFICATION • Type 4 distribution with optional House Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for Side Shield not available with clear or PHOTOCELL/EGRESS ADAPTERS outdoor,wet location use, UL1598,UL ' diffused glass lenses. Factory installed8750 and Canadian CSA Std.C22.2 House Side Shield is optimized for Type Adapters)shall slip over a 4"/100mm no.250. 4 distribution and not recommended for DIA.pole with the luminaire or arm use with Type 2 or 3 distribution and not slipping over the adapter to add a available with type 5 distribution, total of 4.5'/114mm to the overall WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' height. Adapters)shall be prewired, OF SALE independently rotatable 359°,and have Download: ELECTRICAL a cast access cover with an integral lens htto://www.hubbellliahtina.com/resources/ • Luminaires shall have integral surge and lanyard. warranty/ ' protection that shall be U.L.recognized Photocell adapter shall include an internal and have a surge current rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard twist lock receptacle. Photocell by others. 8/20uSec wave and surge rating of 372J. Egress adapter shall require an auxiliary ' • Drivers shall be ELL recognized with an 120 volt supply for operation of an integral inrush current maximum of<20.0 Amps MR16 lamp in the event of emergency. maximum at 230VAC. The lamp may be aimed and locked into • Drivers shall not be compatible with position with an adjustment range of current sourcing dimmers,consult 15°-45°. Adapter shall have a socket that , factory for current list of known accepts miniature bi-pin MR16 lamps up compatible dimming systems,approved to 50 watts,lamp by others. dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. ' t ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB t achitsiiaWrall P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net TYPE rNOTES Copyright 0 2014 Rev 9.15 1 4 1 ' Type W4 AAL UCM-SKB-T4-32LED-3K-450-BLK-HSS- Zener Universe® Collection Medium LED - UCM 50/WMA12-BLK (wail mount) FEATURES DLC qualified IP66,3G vibration housing Custom lumen packages • Up to 1000'wireless communication 20kV/10kA surge suppression Integral thermal protection • Motion sensing up to 40'mounting height 2700-5000K CCT 0-10V dimmable Superior BUG ratings >560 nm Amber 13 standard powder coat finishes Types 11,III,IV,V and custom distributions SPECIFICATIONS ' ANGLED HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-ANG UCM-WND-ANG UCM-SR-ANG UCM-VSL-ANG UCM-LUM-ANG DIAMETER 207508mm 20'I508mm 207508mm 20'1508mm 20'/508mm HEIGHT 14.7/373mm 20.5/520mm 20.7'/526mm 20.5'/521 mm 20.6'/523mm ' WEIGHT 18.25 lbs/8,28kg 21.751bs/9.86k 25 lbs/1 1.3k 22.25 Iths/1 0.1 kg 24.25 lbs/1 lk EPA .60 .72 .74 .72 74 f BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-BEL UCM-WND-BEL UCM-SR-BEL UCM-VSL-BEL UCM-LUM-BEL ' DIAMETER 247610mm 247610mm 247610mm 24'/610mm 24'1610mm HEIGHT /5.87401 mm 21.4'/543mm 21.6'/549mm 19.37'/492mm 21.5'/546mm WEIGHT 2025 lbs/9.2k 23.5 lbs/10.6k 271bs/l 2.25kq 24.25 IbS/1 1 kq 261bs/11.8k EPA .73 .85 .87 .85 .85 FLARE HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-FUR UCM-WND-FLR UCM-SR-FUR UCM-VSL-FUR UCM-LUM-FUR DIAMETER 22'/559mm 22/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm HEIGHT 14,57368mm 19.8/503mm 20.1'/510mm 19.87503mm 20'/508mm ' WEIGHT 18.5 lbs/8.4kq 21.75 lbs/9.87kq 25.25 Ibs110.1 kg 21.75 lbs/9.86kq 24.251bs/1lk EPA .53 .65 .67 .65 .67 1 � n h - STRAIGHT HOOD " �' x,+°" �� �• z'6` �' CONFIGURATION UCM-STR UCM-WND-STR UCM-SR-STR UCM-VSL-STR UCM-LUM-STR ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 247610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 14'/355mm 19.87503mm 20'608mm 19.8'1503mm 19.9'/505mm WEIGHT 20 lbs)9.07kg 23.25 lbs/10.55k 26.75 lbs/12.13k 23.75 lbs/10.77k 25.751bs/11.6Bk EPA .59 .71 .73 .71 .73 1 # � ' SKIRTED BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-SKB UCM-WND-SKB UCM-SR-SKB UCM-VSL-SKB UCM-LUM-SKB DIAMETER 24/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 247611 HEIGHT 19.7'1500mm 23.9'/607mm 242'I615mm 23.9'/607mm 24.1'/612mm ' WEIGHT 20.5 IbS/9.3kq 23.75 lbs/1 0.77kg 27 lbs/1 2.25kq 24.25 lbs/I 1 kQ 26.26 IbS/11.9k EPA .90 1.03 1.05 1.03 1.05 c&S kids 0_ ® ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 1655526.East Gale Ave. I City of Intlusiry 1 CA 91745 JOB --- - - - arealig t raling P 626.966.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aafnet TYPE - arealighting Copyright @ 2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES------ 1 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM I TYPE ' ORDERING INFORMATION t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MODEL Hood Distribution CCT Lumen Package Finish Options Control Voltage Mounting 1. DEL(Must choose one) 4.COLOR TEMPERATURE(Must choose one) 9.VOLTAGE(May choose as noted) , UCM Universe medium without luminous element 1 3 K 30DOK 120-277 VAC input UCM-WND Universe medium with luminous window 4K 4000K 347 347 VAC input UCM-SR Universe medium with luminous solid rings 5K 5000K 480 480 VAC input UCM-VSL Universe medium with luminous vertical slots 27K 2700K' ' 35K 3500K 9.MOUNTING —Must choose one UCM-LUM Universe medium with luminous rings AM >560 am monochromatic amber' POLE MOUNT SLA2 SLA3 2.HOOD 5.LUMEN PACKAGE(Must choose one) SLA4 SLA4-2 FLR Flaredhood 700 71 watts SLA7 SLAT-2 t 45048 watts SLA7(5) SLA7(5)-2 FI -STS Flared hood in natural brushedslainless steel XMA Custom walfage or drive current SLA8D SLA9 FIR-COP Flared hood in natural brushed copper SLA9-2 SLA10 ANG Angled hood 6.FINISH(Must choose one) SLA10-2 SLA16 ' ANG-STS Angled hood in natural brushed stainless steel AWT Arctic White SLA16-2 SLA17 SLA17-2 SLA17(5) ANG-COP Angled hood in natural brushed copper BLK Black SLA17(5)-2 SLA18 STR Straight hood MTB Matte Black SLA18-2 SLA20 STR-STS Straight hood in natural brushed stainless steel DGN Dark Green SLA20-2 SLA20A ' STR-COP Straight hood in natural brushed copper DBZ Dark Bronze SLA20A-2 SLA20B WRZ Weathered Bronze SLA20B-2 SLA20C BEL Bell hood BRM Bronze Metallic SLA20C-2 SLA20D BEL-STS Bell hood in natural brushed stainless steel VBL Verde Blue SLA20D-2 SLA22D BEL-COP Bell hood n natural brushed copper CRT Cotten SLA24 SLA24-2 , ® Skirted bell hood MAL Matte Aluminum SLA24(5) SLA24(5)-2 TRA4 TRA7 SKB-STS Skirted bell hood in nafuralbrushedslamless MDG Medium Grey TRA7-2 TRAB steel ATG Antique Green TRA8-2 TRA9 SKS-COP Skirted bell hood in natural brushed copper LGY Light Grey TRA9-2 ' RAL Premium Calor 3.DISTRIBUTION(Must choose one) CUSTOM"Confacf Factory WALL MOUNT 2 T -32LED Type2 WMA4 WMA5 croCore Precision aimed optics 7,OPTIONS(May choose as noted) WMA6 WMAS ' 2-32 T3-32LED T e3 FTG Flat clearglass lens' WMA9D WMA10 T4-32LED T e4 FLO Flat diffused glass lens' WMA11 Yp SAG Sag clear glass lens" WMA16 WMA17 T5-32LED Types HSS Houser WMA18 WMA20 TX-32LED Custom' SLC Unlit(luminous)element ' WMA22D WMA24 R80 80 CRI mimimum2 WMA37 WMA38 BL Blue inner lens WMA39 RD Red inner lens GHN Green inner lens ' 8. CONTROLS—(May choose as noted) W IR wiScape connectivity 'Contact factory WIRSC wiScape connectivity,integral 'Note forAM color temperature ' motion sensor 3 Not for WMR,WIRSC or SCP control options SCP lifegralphoto-cootroland 4Handheld commissioning tool is required to separately motion sensor' configure or adjust any number of SCP sensors. SCPREMOTE Handheld commissioning tool' RS`S1 House Side shield Zener 50% Fixed Reduced ' lumen output equal to 50% ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ,106 — 16555 East Gale Ave. I Cily of Intlustry 1 CA 91745 ' areal�i hin ll P626.968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I vvvvv.aal.net TYPE 9 9 Copyright 0 2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES--- —_____--- 1 2 1 ' Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE " e2s `* " bpHeal e�ondary Leo ➢lett buu r Y y e a Bo Bug DnYey ' Syatem. or STlir;id . 4E� L1ghi Engme:* Bred:Efhrae g Dei ve tl ; eat Deliveredihp Bug Aa ng Current 3Watlar ytUmeos: (Imhvv�t Ragng$ Lumens 'i1w7 Lumens e(Imtw rT`; (ma) t,.._,_ .t w I 11: G? '. . v, B7 IT",G r AeP?+ B A7-._G TYPE 2 T2-32LED 6186 87 2 0 2 No Lens TYPE T3-32LED 6168 87 1 0 2y `A��.° (Standard) TYPE 4 T4-32LED 6081 86 1 0 2 '- 0 i yfl5. ,46,11.. 650 71 TYPES T5-32LED 6227 88 3 0 2 " Y' House Side TYPE4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 4495 63 0 0 2 4768 67 0 0 2 4781 67 0 0 2 Shield MlcraCore TYPE T2-32LED 4607 98 2 0 2 4830 103 2 0 2 4844 101 2 El ' NoLens TYPE T3-32LED 4570 95 1 0 1 4791 100 1 0 2 4805 101 1 (Standard) TYPE 4 T4-32LED 4570 97 1 0 2 4791 102 1 0 2 4805 100 1 TYPE TS-32LED 4602 98 3 0 1 4825 103 3 0 1 4839 101 3 TYPE4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 3366 72 0 0 2 3529 75 0 0 2 3539 74 0 Shield ' ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS s g D w tine k u z r + s ° �OrdenngGatle n d , * ,F k Amps AC myt power 0 eratm Dans, out of a}OV' rami on 014V j?•),, mSystem+,sN r* ,e, vel* 1 Voltage p gr u eQrei� „� .; on s ctor temp Aangc 3Aange ,'Ar �- - s'-r } Element yAC i HZ 4720.277 347 480 '"- ;�,- 4*xh Mex iAI `Mini ' Without Luminous 7000 71 0.6 03 0.2 0.1 Element 120 4500 47 P77 0.401 MicroCore 32LED 50160 .9 20 30°CTO+40'C 10%TO 100% 0Ll-AGIA 1mA 7001650 73 347 0.6 WNDISTINSULUM 480 450 450 49 0.4 0.2 0.1 O1 SENSOR DETECTION RANGE �r�`+ r,+�t1,Qwt }2' t?Sfi14n'€-r iS'A ,q 1&e �`: 20'„v#' '2v-- `s 304 3'�"355"a b0' COVERAGE SCP 20' 25' 30' 35' 40' 45' 50' 62.5' 75' 87.5' 100' 1'.2.5 DIAMETER WIRSC 16' 20' 24' 28' 32' 36' 40' NIA NIA NIA NA 12 1 LED COLOR ' F CCTAvem e 30001 40001 1 5000K CRI Minimum 70 70 70 ' Ratio 1.2 1.5 1.8 ' Consult factory for Amber,Turtle Friendly,Gulf Coast ano Observatory applications. TM-21 LIFETIME CALCULATION Optical System Ordering Code Ambient Environment°C 15rojeeted25men Maintenance((%vs.Khro)00 Reported L70 , 15 98 98 97 9fi 94 MicroCore 32LED 25 98 97 96 96 93 >96Khrs 40 96 95 93 92 89 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING' JOB -01'CIIit0C�111'al 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 — _ P626,968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I www.aal.net TYPE — arealighting Copyright m 2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES— I 3 I t Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' SPECIFICATIONS , HOUSING CONTROLS SERVICING • All housing components shall be die- Wireless enabled fixtures shall support Luminaire shall have tool-less service cast aluminum,sealed with continuous to-directional radio frequency(RF) access to the gear compartment. Driver ' silicone rubber gaskets. and surge suppressor shall be mounted communications utilizing IEEE 802.15.4 to a prewired tray with quick disconnects • Hood and spacers shall be heavy gauge operating in the 2.4GHZ ISM band. that may be removed from the gear spun aluminum with hemmed edges for Up to 1000'wireless range may be compartment. ' added rigidity. reduced by physical obstructions • Luminous rings shall be clear acrylic with between fixtures. an internal lens. ARM MOUNTING • Standard configurations do not require Motion sensor shall be flame retardant, Luminaire shall be attached to the arm ' recyclable rec act resistant impact p , y a flat lens,optional lenses shall he UV resistantassembly with three stainless steel bolts. tempered glass polycarbonate. The connection shall be sealed with a • All internal and external hardware shall Motion Sensor shall use passive infrared silicone compression gasket. be stainless steel. (PIR)sensing technology that reacts • Post top arms and brackets shall slip ' • Optical bezel finish shall match the to changes in infrared energy(moving over a 4'/100mm O.D.or a 67127mm as luminaire housing. body heat)within the coverage area. configured and secured with six stainless Careful consideration must be given to steel set screws. obstructions that may block the sensor's • Wall mounted arms and brackets shall OPTICAL line of sight. require mounting hardware by others. ' • Patent pending MicroCoreT-LED Factory default settings for SCP option modules shall independently aim shall be: FINISH each light emitting diode(LED)in both horizontal rotation and vertical tilt angle. - High mode: 10V luminaire finish shall consist of a five , • LEDs shall be mounted to a metal printed - Low mode: 1V stage pretreatment regimen with a circuit board assembly(PCBA)with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off,and Rt uniform conformal coating over the panel - amp-up rate:disabled top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. surface and electrical features. - Fade-down rate:disabled , • LED optics shall be clear injection - Photocell:Off Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA molded PMMA acrylic. performance specification which includes Sensitivity:Full includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray • MicroCoral"^PCBA and optic shall be test for corrosion resistance. sealed to a die-cast anodized aluminum - Time Delay: Fade to low:5 minutes , heat sink with an injection molded silicone rubber gasket.IP66, - Time Delay:Fade to off: 1 hour CERTIFICATION • Type 4 distribution with optional House • Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for Side Shield not available with clear or PHOTOCELL/EGRESS ADAPTERS outdoor,wet location use,U1_1598,UL , diffused glass lenses. Factory installed Ada8750 and Canadian CSA Std.C22.2 House Side Shield is optimized for Type Adapter(s)shall slip over a 4'/100mm no.250. 4 distribution and not recommended for DIA.pole with the luminaire or arm use with Type 2 or 3 distribution and not slipping over the adapter to add a available with type 5 distribution. total of 4.57114mm to the overall WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' height. Adapters)shall be prewired, OF SALE independently rotatable 3590,and have Download: ELECTRICAL a cast access cover with an integral lens htto//www hubbelilighting.com/resources/ lanyard. warranty/ , • Luminaires shall have integral surge and lan Y protection that shall be U.L.recognized Photocell adapter shall include an internal and have a surge current rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard twist lock receptacle. Photocell by others. 8/20uSec wave and surge rating of 372J. Egress adapter shall require an auxiliary t • Drivers shall be U.L recognized with an 120 volt supply for operation of an integral inrush current maximum of<20.0 Amps MR16 lamp in the event of emergency. maximum at 230VAC. The lamp may be aimed and locked into • Drivers shall not be compatible with position with an adjustment range of current sourcing dimmers,consult 150-45°. Adapter shall have a socket that ' factory for current list of known accepts miniature bi-pin MR16 lamps up compatible dimming systems,approved to 50 watts,lamp by others. dimmers include Lutron Diva AVN, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. i® ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB architectural P626.968.5666 I F62&369,2695 1 www.aal.net TYPE —__-__ arealighting Copyright©2014 Rev 9.i5 NOTES_-- -- _ _ 1al Type W41- AAL 4LAAL UCM-SKB-T4-32LED-3K-450-BLK-HSS- Zener Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM 35NVMA12-BLK (wall mount) ' FEATURES DLC qualified W66,3G vibration housing Custom lumen packages • Up to 1000'wireless communication 20kV/10kA surge suppression Integral thermal protection ' Motion sensing up to 40'mounting height 2700-5000K CCT 0-10V dimmable Superior BUG ratings >560 nm Amber 13 standard powder coat finishes Types II,III,IV,V and custom distributions SPECIFICATIONS I z ANGLED HOOD '�"'''- 'r`"� `::x"15• ' CONFIGURATION UCM-ANG UCM-WND-ANG UCM-SR-ANG UCM-VSL-ANG UCM-LUM-ANG DIAMETER 20'/508mm 20'/508mm 2U/508mm 20'/508mm 20'/508mm HEIGHT 14.7'/373mm 20.57520mm 20.7'/526mm 20.5'/521 mm 20.6'/523mm ' WEIGHT 1825 lbs/8.28kg 21.75 lbs/9.86k 26 lbs/1 1.3kq 22.25 bs/10.1kq 24.251bs/11k EPA .60 .72 .74 .72 .74 �*eL cX ' BELL HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-BEL UCM-WND-BEL UCM-SR-BEL UCM-VSL-BEL UCM-LUM-BEL ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 15.8'/401mm 21.4/543mm 21.6'/549mm 19.37'/492mm 21.5'/546mm WEIGHT 20.25 lbs/92k 235 os/1 0.6ko 27 lbs/12.25k 24.25 Ibs/1 lkq 261bs/11.8k EPA .73 .85 .87 .85 .85 ' FLARE HOOD - CONFIGURATION UCM-FUR UCM-WND-FIR UCM-SR-FlR UCM-VSL-FLR UCM-LUM-FUR DIAMETER 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22'/559mm 22/559mm HEIGHT 14.5'/368mm 19.8'/503mm 20.1'/510mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm WEIGHT 18.5 lbs/8.4kg 2175 lbs/9,87kg 25.25 Ibs/10.1kq 21.75 lbs/9.86kg 24.251bs/11k ' EPA .53 .65 .67 .65 .67 M.? STRAIGHT HOOD CONFIGURATION UCM-STR UCM-WND-STR UCM-SR-STR UCM-VSE-STR UCM-LUM-STR ' DIAMETER 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm 24'/610mm HEIGHT 14'/355mm 19.8'/503mm 20'/508mm 19.8'/503mm 19.9/505mm WEIGHT 20 lbs/9.07kg 23.25 lbs/10.55k 26.75 lbs/12.13k 23.75 lbs/10.77k 25.75lbs/11.68k EPA .59 .71 .73 .71 .73 -a.�.�x.•.. SKIRTED BELL HOOD ' CONFIGURATION UCM-SKB UCM-WND-SKB UCM-SR-SKB UCM-VSL-SKB UCM-LUM-SKB DIAMETER 24/610mm 24'/610mm 24/610mm 24'/610mm 247610mm HEIGHT 19.7'/500mm 23.97607mm 24.2'/615mm 23.9'/607mm 24.1'/612mm WEIGHT 20.5 IbS/9.3kg 2175 ibs/1 0.77kg 27 lbs/12.25k 24,251bs/1 I kg 26.251bs/11.9k EPA .90 1.03 X�1.005�5 1.0311 105 Ida ® ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING '-- 16555 East Gale Ave. Cityof Industry I CA 91745 JOB --- --- - architectural P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 ..aal.net TYPE arealighting Copyright©2014 Rev 9.15 NOTES- 1 I Universe° Collection Medium LED - UCM TYPE ' ORDERING INFORMATION ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 it in n n n n n n n n i ' MODEL Hood Distribution CCT Lumen Package Finish Options Control Voltage Mounting 1. DEL(Must choose one) 4.COLOR TEMPERATURE(Must choose one) 9.VOLTAGE(May choose as noted) ' -CM Universe medium without luminous element I 3K 30DOK I 120-277 UAC input UCM-WND Universe medium with luminous window 4K 4000K 347 347 VAC opul UCM-SR Universe medium with luminous solid rings 5K 5000K 480 480 VAC input UCM-VSL Universe medium with luminous vertical slots 27K 2700K' ' 35K 3500K 9.MOUNTING -Must choose one UCM-LUM Universe medium with luminous rings AM >560 nm monochromatic amberPOLE MOUNT SLA2 SLA3 2.HOOD 5.LUMEN PACKAGE(Must choose one) SLA4 SLA4-2 FLR Flared hood 700 71 watts SLA7 SLA7-2 ' 450 48 watts SLA7(5) SLA7(5)-2 FLR-STS Flared hood in natural brushed stainless steel usfom wattage ordrAe current I SLABD SLA9 FLR-COP Flared hood in natural brushed copper SLA9-2 SLA10 ANG Angledhood 6.FINISH(Must choose one) SLA10-2 SLA16 ANG-STS Angledhoodin naturalbrushedsfainlesssteel AWT Arctic White SLA7SLA17-2 SLA17 ' 7-2 SLA17(5) ANG-COP Angledhoodin naturalbrushedcope6r BLK Black SLA17(5)-2 SLA16 STR Straight hood MTB Matte Black SLA18-2 SLA20 STR-STS Straight hood in natural brushed stainless steel DGN Dark Green SLA20-2 SLA20A ' STR-COP Straight hood in natural brushed copper DBZ Dark Bronze SLA20A-2 SLA20B BEL Bell hood WRZ Weathered Bronze SLA20C 2 SLA20D BRM Bronze Metallic BEL-STS Bell hood in natural brushed stainless steel VBL Verde Blue SLA20D-2 SLA22D BEL-COP Bell hood n natural brushed copper CRT Cotten SLA24 SLA24-2 ' ® Skirtedbellhood MAL MatfeAluminum SLA24(5) SLA24(5)-2 TRA4 TRA7 SKB-STS Skirted bell hood in natural brushed stainless MEG Medium Grey TRA7-2 TRAB steel ATG Antique Green TRA8-2 TRA9 SKB-COP Skirtedbellhoodin natural brushed copper LGY Light Grey TRA9-2 ' RAL Premium Color 3.DISTRIBUTION(Must choose one) CUSTOM"Contact Factory WALL MOUNT WMA4 WMA5 T -32LED Type 2Precision aimed optics 7,OPTIONS(May choose as noted) W MA6 W MA8 ' 2-32 T3-32LED T e3 FTG Flat clear glass lens' WMALI WMA10 T4-32LED T e4 FLO Flat diffused glass lens' WMA11 YP SAG Sagclearglasslens" WMA16 WMA17 T5-32LED Types Type 4 WMA18 WMA20 TX-32LED Custom' HSS Houseummous)eleSide shield r element SLC Unlit(luminous)elemenf WMA22D WMA24 ' R80 80 CRI mimimum2 WMA37 WMA38 8L Blue inner lens WMA39 RD Red inner lens GRN Green inner lens ' 6. CONTROLS-(May choose as noted) W IR wiScape connectivity 'Contact factory WIRSC wiScape connectivity,integral 1 Note LorAM color temperature ' motion sensor ''Not for WIR,WIRSC or SCP control options SCP Integral photo-control and 'Handheld commissioning tool is required to separately motion sensor° configure or adjust any number of SCP sensors. SCPREMOTE Handheld commissioning tool HSS House Side shield ' Zener 35%- Fixed Reduced umen , output equal to 50% t ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING - 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Intlustry I CA 91745 JOB arClllteL tral P 626 968 5666 1 F 626,369.2695 1 wwwsal.net TYPE ----- ' arealighting Copyright©2014 Rev9.15 NOTES-------- 1 2 I 1 Universe° Collection Medium LED — UCM TYPE ' LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE h.�i"^�, .5 't W •£r ;xa m- 3K s.2v rns€ k44K '�,'47"PNµ Ophcal,g eeohdany Len : Dlstnbutlon.b ' r A" S BUS t �' Bu ; 3 g 3"° ° Dgre System ' System$ - or$Meld - y L,ght Engme, DomensElm/w pllivkred�EhN14y N9'+ LmensElm'/wy sing Ra,Dng Curren4;FW s. e� s b ,. � � " _ TYPE T2-32LED 6186 87 2 0 2 Wi 01JUX._ Vt M r. 3`Ot 9 y'ta •zDe,. , No Lens TYPE T3-32LED 6168 87 1 0 2 ' (Standard) TYPE 4 T4-32LED 6081 86 1 0 2 MR, s'�'. 650 71 TYPE T5-32LED 6227 88 3 0 2 House Side TYPE 4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 4495 63 0 0 2 4768 67 0 0 2 4781 67 0 0 2 MicroCore Shield ' TYPE2 T2-32LED 4607 98 2 0 2 4830 103 2 0 2 4844 101 2 0 2 No Lens TYPE3 T3-32LED 4570 95 1 0 1 4791 100 1 0 2 4805 101 1 0 2 (Standard) TYPE T4.32LED 1 4570 97 1 0 2 4791 102 1 0 2 4805 100 1 0 2 450 47 TYPE T5-32LED 1 4602 98 3 0 1 4825 103 1 3 10 1 14839 1 101 3 1 0 1 1 ' House Side TYPE 4 T4-32LED-..:HSS 3366 72 0 0 2 3529 75 0 0 2 3539 74 0 0 2 Shield ' ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS #{ ;tom 5_`5 `k •�� {.Ar� F ' fi"sem 4 �`a a?k 'T.>^vi`3+Driver`�i',Y'� Y`kc sF�r 7Y#�*'1�TR�a�N's*.aew.,i�a'�-0 m nr'k'�uSs,.;rte ' �-,6`.:r, , -� a , �' 4' 9y�atam: r .s .IM.dt� .r ,*, yt,s �h ' Source aurfenk� kAbadute vdltage;r•• , ptlCalrs v#'Gy° �. mi' r" r;uLEA Wans ,Llne Am A T '' ` a s qr out ofOiDV aon. 0 OV +3 ateXm� FFF ,�`Ae.�9. 4, d'dve Idlag '�`'�� Mm power ,TNO �pe U1 g is rd le wue ' gn'lewn's "`T a v{r,Nen a n s a Taetor T Temp Rang- a Range ,r ?; '�`'7 "�. A Den�D);'�AC �� 120;277'247 48➢'' r „l">°� � `� `�� Iln'T ' Wdhout Luminous 700 650 71 0.6 0.3 120 Element 450 450 47 277 0.4 0.2 MicroCore 32LED 50160 :9 20 WC TO+40T 10%TO 100% 0mA 1m4 OmA tout 700 650 73 347 0.6 0.3 ' WNO/$RINSE/LUM 480 450 450 49 0.4 0.2 SENSOR DETECTION RANGE ' R "ve+ E,vy+ays,,+tv r�/BEN60 'M6UR77117 NELGI�.TTx %a;s.O"� Y'• "` Y.§t+B"M+ >'rn41 .�.8'�.� ig;��'�12 an`�f4,.,S `:°i6'x 18 T�•; 2D��- 25��� 1 ',�35'�( r.40+,• ;�J RATIO FCOVERAGEI SCP 20' 1 25' 1 30' 1 35' 1 40' 1 45' 1 50' 1 62.5' 1 75' 87.5' 1 100' 1 12.5 DIAMETER I WIRSC 16' 1 20' 1 24' 1 28' 1 32' 1 36' 1 40' 1 NIA I NIA I NA I NA 1 12 LED COLOR r .:ah 3K ?'Vti9K. * t * �i•a"ry_`..-. CCTAvera a 3000K 4000K 5000K CRIMinimum 70 70 70 SIP Ratio 1.2 1.5 1.8 ' Consult factory for Amber,Turtle Friendly,Gulf Coast and Observatory applications. TM-21 LIFETIME CALCULATION Optical System Ordering Code Ambient Environment°C Projected Lumen Maintenance I%vs.Khrs) Reported L70 15 25 50 6D 100 15 98 98 97 9694 MicroCore 32LED 25 98 97 96 96 93 >96Khrs 40 96 95 93 92 89 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING ' 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB -- arehttectural P 626.968.5666 I F 626.369.2695 I v .aal.net TYPE _ arealighting Copyright 02014 Rev 9.15 NOTES I 3 I Universe® Collection Medium LED — UCM ( TYPE ' SPECIFICATIONS ' HOUSING CONTROLS SERVICING • All housing components shall be die- Wireless enabled fixtures shall support Luminaire shall have tool-less service cast aluminum,sealed with continuous bi-directional radio frequency(RF) access to the gear compartment. Driver ' silicone rubber gaskets. and surge suppressor shall be mounted communications utilizing IEEE 802.15.4 to a prewired tray with quick disconnects • Hood and spacers shall be heavy gauge operating in the 2.4GHZ ISM bandthat may be removed from the gear spun aluminum with hemmed edges for Up to 1000'wireless range may be compartment. ' added rigidity. reduced by physical obstructions • Luminous rings shall be clear acrylic with between fixtures. an internal lens. ARM MOUNTING • Standard configurations do not require Motion sensor shall be flame retardant, Luminaire shall be attached to the arm ' UV resistantimpact resistantrecyclable, p , y a flat lens,optional lenses shall be assembly with three stainless steel bolts. tempered glass polycarbonate. The connection shall be sealed with a • All internal and external hardware shall Motion Sensor shall use passive infrared silicone compression gasket. be stainless steel. (PIR)sensing technology that reacts • Post top arms and brackets shall slip • Optical bezel finish shall match the to changes in infrared energy(moving over a 4'/100mm O.D.or a 5"/127mm as luminaire housing. body heat)within the coverage area. configured and secured with six stainless ' Careful consideration must be given to steel set screws. obstructions that may block the sensor's • Wall mounted arms and brackets shall OPTICAL line of sight. require mounting hardware by others. , • Patent pending MicroCcreT"LED Factory default settings for SCP option modules shall independently aim shall be: FINISH each light emitting diode(LED)in both horizontal rotation and vertical tilt angle. - High mode: 10V Luminaire finish shall consist of a five ' • LEDs shall be mounted to a metal printed - Low mode: TV stage pretreatment regimen with a circuit board assembly(PCBA)with a polymer primer sealer,oven dry off,and uniform conformal coating over the panel - Ramp-up rate:disabled top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. surface and electrical features. - Fade-down rate:disabled ' • LED optics shall be clear injection - Photocell:Off Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA molded PMMA acrylic. 605.2 performance specification which Sensitivity:Full includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray • MicroCoreT-PCBA and optic shall be test for corrosion resistance. sealed to a die-cast anodized aluminum - Time Delay:Fade to low:5 minutes ' heat sink with an injection molded Time Delay:Fade to off: 1 hour silicone rubber gasket.F66. CERTIFICATION • Type 4 distribution with optional House Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for Side Shield not available with clear or PHOTOCELL/EGRESS ADAPTERS outdoor,wet location use,UL1598,UL diffused glass lenses. Factory installedAdapter(s)shall slip over a 4'l100mm 8750 and Canadian CSA Std.C22.2 • House Side Shield is optimized for Type no.250. , 4 distribution and not recommended for DIA.pole with the luminaire or arm use with Type 2 or 3 distribution and not slipping over the adapter to add a available with type 5 distribution. total of 4.5"/114mm to the overall WARRANTY/TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' height. Adapter(s)shall be prewired, OF SALE independently rotatable 3599,and have Download: ELECTRICAL a cast access cover with an integral lens htto://www.hubbeliliahtina.com/resources/ • Luminaires shall have integral surge and lanyard. warranty ' protection that shall be U.L.recognized Photocell adapter shall include an internal and have a surge current rating of 10,000 twist lock receptacle. Photocell by others. Amps using the industry standard S/20uSec wave and surge rating of 372J. Egress adapter shall require an auxiliary ' • Drivers shall be U.L recognized with an 120 volt supply for operation of an integral inrush current maximum of<20.0 Amps MR16 lamp in the event of emergency. maximum at 230VAC. The lamp may be aimed and locked into • Drivers shall not be compatible with position with an adjustment range of current sourcing dimmers,consult 15°45°. Adapter shall have a socket that ' factory for current list of known accepts miniature bi-pin MR16 lamps up compatible dimming systems,approved to 50 watts,lamp by others. dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. , ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 JOB ' architectural P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 I www.aal.net TYPE -- arealighting CoPynght©2014 Rei 9.15 NOTES—___ 1 4 1 1 4 1 3 2 _ POLE SPECIFICATIONS N0. COMPONENT MAIL DESIGNATION 1. POLE SHAFT 6063-T6 - Z. BASE PLATE A356-T6 3. ANCHOR BOLTS F1554 GR.55 u$ TENON MOUNT OPTIONS: 4 GALVANRED MAROWARE A153 �m T2-02.38 OD X 4.00 LG FINISH SPECIFICATIONS " "5 T3-03.00 OD X 5.00 LG POLES SHALL HAVE A POLYESTER POWDER COAT FINISH IN A STANDARD COLOR. 6 s o S D T4-04.00 OD X 6.00 LG POLE DIMENSIONS55°�E,', D LE H TOP DIA. IN. BOTTOM DIA. IN. GAGE G.HGT. FT. F o U 12' 9.00 4.00 .125 12' ?o 645E PLATE DIMENSIONS E z m ui Bd-LY-CIRCLE IN. BASE PLATEDIM, IN. BOLT HOLE IN. PLATE THK. IN. $==h N 6.J5 9.62 DIA .88 .15 ANCHOR BOLT DIMENSIONS i C POLE SHAFT .25 THK TENON MOUNT ANCHOR BOLT D ANCHOR 20.00 LT LENGTH N� ;o�€ TENON MOUNT OPTIONS ALLOWAB EWINDL AD1NG t5LI. WaRy WIND* BO MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH 120 MPH N�$i ry EPA 6.6 5.0 3J 23 -WITH 1.3 GUST FACTOR Typical Pole. Specify overall length to accommodatew3 REMOVABLE CAP 12 fixture mounting height including =aW footing height as finally designed. v >_ DRILLED PER F RE REQUIREMENTS: Dl-DRILLED FOR 1 FIXTURE p S z t ; C D2-DRILLED FOR 2 FIXTURES AT 900 OR 180° z^S H S o C D3-DRILLED FOR 3 FIXTURES AT 90°OR 1200 D4-DRILLED FOR 4 FIXTURES rz a o POLE SHAFT c DRILLED MOUNT OPTIONS y$o POLE HGT. °�'-w (FT-) 2.00 X 4.00 HAND HOLE COVER F, 3 A 1 r 0.75 B 09.62 � B J F 2.00 X 4.00 '`�+is' { •'h-'� +e m z HAND HOLE 17.00 W1 COVER \ g o a > 06.75 i BOLT CIRCLE o s p w C5 .. �Y A t 180° A 14.00 �` ,�� 270°+90° II POLE DETAIL x.75 X 20.00DANCHOR LT 09.62 X 1.88 THK. BASE CASTING 0° BO HANDHOLE 4 1 3 1pZ Wall Mount Arms ' WMA12 — Contemporary Wall Mount Arm I TYPE ' 1.ARM 2.COLOR WMA12 1.ARM DIMENSIONS SPECIFICATIONS WMA12(Weight.121111 M,. The arm shall be of one piece unitized aluminum ' ssomm construction.fully weltletl and assembled.The back plate shall be one piece cast aluminum.The arm shall be prewired with a quick connector for easy installation. ' 2. COLOR The arm shall have a cast aluminum titter welded c at to the top of the arms)for attaching the fixture. WT Arctic While VBU Verde Blue 150nin ns— The fixture shall be mounted with three stainless BL Slack CRT Ce4M ��ai,c, 2T steel bolts through the top of the arm fitter into the ' BLT Matte Black MAL MalleAlumince aoo 1 as szsmm fixture.The attachment point shall have a silicone DGN Dark Green MG Medium Greycomm wREwnv pad for sealing the fixture to arm connection. DB Dark Bronze AGN Antique Green 1_ Isem Mounting hardwamand J-box by others WDB WealheredBronze LG Light Grey o-xc ' MOB Bronze Melsllic RAL Premium Color CUSTOM"Contact Factory Note Back plate is welded to the arm. WMA12 1 1 JOB TYPE ' NOTES ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 ' P 626.9685666 1 F 626.369.2695 I www.aal.net Copyright O 2012 1 REV 6.12 1 1 1 i SLA4/SLA4-2 — Contemporary Arms TYPE Pole Mount arms 1.ARM 2.COLOR ' SLA4 ' 1.ARM DIMENSIONS SPECIFICATIONS SLA4(Slips over 4'pole.Weight14 tes. EPA:1.39) _ The arm shall be of one piece unitized aluminum r--eesm°m--I construction,fully welded and assembled.The slip fitter shall be cast aluminum with an internal ' wireway and pole stop.The arm shall be prewired with a quick connector for easy installation. 2. COLOR The arm shall have a cast aluminum fitter welded to the top of the arm for attaching the fixture.The WT Arctic White VBU Verde Blue °r fixture shall be mounted with three stainless steel ' SL Black CRT Cohen t.l75mm bolts through the top of the arm fitter into the BLT Matte Black MAL Matte Aluminum 20�6 fit emm fixture.The attachment point shall have a silicone DGN Dark Green MG Medium Grey pad for sealing the fixture to arm connection. DB Dark Bronze AGN Antique Green fir The arm shall slip over a 4'/100mm diameter WDB WealheredBronze LG Light Grey t5om pole or tenon.The cast aluminum slip fitter shall MDB Bronze Metallic RAL Premium Color have six stainless steel cup point set screws for CUSTOM"Contact SLA4(4'pole) securing the arm to the pole or tenon. Factory 1 551? ]99mm k r, r--)—i 11,14r 75mm z°v°' 619mm ' 6' 150. SLA4-2/4'pole) ' JOB TYPE ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING NOTES ' 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 P 626.968.5666 1 F 626.369.2695 1 www.aal.net Copyright®2012 I REV 6.12 1 1 t RECEIVE SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP MAY 31 2016 ATTORNEYS AT LAW DEPT, OF PLANNING $ 63 FEDERAL STREET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE KRISTIN E. KOLICK 978-741-4683 May 31, 2016 VIA HAND DELIVERY Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: High Rock Bridge Street, LLC Request to Amend Site Plan Review and Special Permits under the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Overlay District Decision dated May 24, 1010 44 Boston Street and 401 Bridge Street Dear Ms. Chiancola: Enclosed please find two checks in the amount of $2,500.00 and $544.00, both payable to the City of Salem, representing the additional civil and traffic peer review fees. If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, oseph . Correnti � JCC:dI Enclosures cc: High Rock Bridge Street, LLC 331 LAFAYETTE STREET nil -USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING ° �c MIXED 331-335 LAFAYETTE STREET, 5-7 & 11 WEST AVENUE U °4 'a; � (ASSESSOWS MAP 52, LOTS 231, 232, 233 AND 234) o SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 40 s � N My PROEOSEG C WL4.IERCIAE � - a = LAFAYETTE STREET ELEVATION WEST wmtoawmo AVENUE- PLAN WW APPLICANT: SCHEDULE OF PLAN SET DRAWINGS ' a CIVIL ENGINEER: ROBERT BURR THE MORIN—CAMERON GROUP, INC. C-1 COVER SHEET C/C 331 LAFAYETTE, LCC 447 BOSTON STREET, US ROUTE i - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN ' 75 NANEPASHEMET STREET TOPSFIELD, MA 01983 C-2 C-3 EITE LAYOUT PLAN o MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 PHONE: 978-887-8586 C-4 GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN S SURVEYOR: D-1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS I E v BUILDING ARCHITECT: DGT SURVEY GROUP-NORTH SHORE D-2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS II PITMAN & WARDLEY ARCHITECTS 18 CENTER STREET, SUITE 1 - D-3 -CONSTRUCTION DETAILS III 32 CHURCH STREET NEWBURYPORT, MA 01950 L-1 .PLANTING PLAN CL SALEM, MA 01970 978-465-9992 _ SL-1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN w..I w PHONE: 978-744-8982 A-1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SALEM A-2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN rn 4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: A-3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN t14 •rw¢ JAMES K. EMMANUEL ASSOCIATES A-4 LAFAYETTE STREET ELEVATION zz cARLroN RonO A-5 WEST AVENUE ELEVATION MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 A-6 SIDE ELEVATION LOCUS .t3 - PHONE: 781-622.-7487 - A-7 REAR ELEVATION W P - W y �w ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FEBRUARY 26, 2016 y�4 REVISIONS THROUGH MAY 512016 O iRE M;_MMN GROUP,INC.2016 LOCHS MAP N.T.S. PROW 1. 9 i SALEM LEGEND: - 114 BIT BIRMINOUS - - - - - FpµSt AVElA6 RIVER PARK' GOING CONCRETE - - CUFTON A age i�l DH DRILL Hot£ ' LOCUSm vg� O 4 s W H -FOP EPAMEMENT. ND FOUNDDC£6 IZ1' IP WM PIPE - / Foe TR IRON ROD - �y Rp,1p - ` F? Gplo ® TC CURB TOP INGWTE V ]5 b VCC VERTCPL CflPM1E CURBTTM A l IY M�_Efi 7 Z1z' LOCUS MAP NT.S YO GAS VMEM(G11) .iPEDWGI XFYIFwslttur IAT"AY smEET d/�] CM.M, iapPAD 29- C m GAS GATE(W) IDEW/RI.../_/ xEw GYNe 1FIWIdF IM /S. w ^ . / PewY1Y G41011 rfFD YFAIEIXi mL. 8 ® CARN BASN(®) j �„ I JWA]y epa Tum vA(£m _ ANssoNuM- .1 - © SEMER MANHOLE(SMR) Ag/ I / \ D y RECORD OWNERS- ' GRAIN MANHOLE IDMN) °�Gc/ryry O - /{ y- 11 L -II /1EIE Dm vo,OW10¢ AMILY EMERPRIMS MI FLAFAMITE 51RFETT }+�s HYDRANT G 3 I _ d� 12 1 \E,MROd TPU..,AM MU I USED WON 10042 PAGE 405 y Nm UTILITY POLElam" 3 �� fms _ /RF 41116 (BIJ �y(/ 1 \ PAIHIOA MOSS k UWAN PRINCE k3 IFIWtt POI£w1M UON - /mI 11 WEST AVENUE DEFD BOOK 25955 PAIS 113WI WAYETTE # UOIT POLE(IP) MW / '3 X30_ g 1 k� an.] y]wEsi AVENUE OM METAL POST T / MED BOOK 344M PACE IN y0y MW ® -SIGN l / ysr oxw .WRY1E ��g�-�zs, (I IN - REFERENCES, a -73,86 � MAMBO% 8 / 10154] f `��, DEED BOCK 1004ESSEX COUNTY 82 PATSY<BSOf�S Y 6 SPOT GRADE DEED BOC](24030 PAM 425 uuiw vim¢ - YYY I I 0 L` /�O a tt xai Aynv¢ 9 1 . O w WATER IME $$$ TAY Rd' 1 5 MED BCM 13366 PAGE 150 l 4 ], S¢ O/� \ I EI \ 0.1]2 Rau/ .RAN BOOK 066 PLAN 147PLAN BOOM 183 PLAN 7 PLAN t w q —sK%ER UNE . - I I { �1® emlvt,a (xi4 \\ rya - PUN 1344 Sift OF 96]951 LN1 I J / I N/r III 6G6Y EMER7 SES aWu9c __._ \\ RAN US M 1972 —UE —ELECTRIC LONE 3 I < ssl IKA�ETIE. PAa¢N WGP�®���� - �/ � � PUN BOOK 300 PVN 93 I 1� /SEM1. --T TELEPHONE UNE / I I §I 23,525L 54 Rd - xemc \ \ cvEcwry a nulxu . OAS'— a.51 GAS ul¢. % 0.5411 ANNA s1'JJSTE DIORV]61S EW \ • UMs1AN / Sb +f I.M ._.. m9Y I I ]0.l AU \ 13 mwtgS55/IY91UE 6 .. OPhAYM WIRES - QI b MMD FIRMlI I I ]l.9 3 RALE .119 1O5]Wnt ]4m' / (xDr spm) . AswKoE MAP/LOT I P I Daa- \ O 4Y9'E n i� vAeas tpr `-- I/K�LSI 4' - I-a T.ee AMONN / 185 fill.tlYG +' �'� Ip II.$ Y.9W SIEPs 1.4' $ 1 gI 3 I �M1ffi �y�'� x/i TIA IRMCE / rI yNI I / �" IN INAIETcSIPRT V O R f]l3 P^ 4..02 SµFwl ]1a4' 5�BB52 Sq.FM FS 1 2 1/2 RMY I HEREBY QRPFT GNAT ME BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED AS S1OVM AND MAY TIES g I 0.1132 Agee O.IJ52 Aaa ly Y MOOD FRAME AN _GROUND a UNAW PLW /m _$• I I SHS z-F MILY sss FOUND AT ME PLAN a BASEZE M ME SURWY 9 flh AND PR S NR ME FACTS A W ✓� 5, ,Iv WIYGn mm- l OT WfIIILN�12 D nl nFvs .nrc m 1 . ] /.s.x eiiO1Ei PANA W � m E-31 GNGN e f[ l; LV ISx 8Etl IUW 5611SEC2-�GcO /DwWvTx ��' . + 166 b DD D D D o—D D-. o—wAW—w—W—W l y WW W—W W W W—5 w w PROFESSMAL LNN sURSETOR DAZER) *_w W_ I 5 5 5 5—s-g-A`li'vA w -W —W—W W A W— w _WE —6 D3-4 6�ic C\Gs C 4 —C W —G � CSC. D. w O W � 33 - - ssm°�T CRR® I R°pel.ua �=z6oi C) s.1.27.1e'xr-m e r m�.-zza - O PLAN NOTES: CL g n g 1. THE ENDING CMDmMS INFEWMAnM SIMN M1104 FOR 131-335 IiFAYETTE STREET AND 5,7 k 11 WEST AVENUE WAS OBTAINED MGM ACTUAL FIFD STRAY$PERFORMED BY DG]SURVEY r W M _ CROUP-NMM 91CRE M AWE I Q Z 2015 AND JANUARY 11,2016. In 2 EI MONS BASED ON NA`A60 AS ESTABUEIIFO BY WS WSAVAPMi cn 1 MIS PUN IS PREPARED NR WR DINT UM ONLY FM THE SPECIFIC RNSOM M OBEAWINC - Q PERMITS AND LOCAL APPROVALS,AND IS NOT TO BE USN M SPUR UPM AS A CONSDRUCDM DONMNT M ANT CHER USE BY OTHERS"OUT ME WRITTEN CONSENT CF ME � MORIN-CAMERON GROUP. M ' - 1. ZO1pIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES COMPILED fRW CI1Y 6 SALEM ZONING MM DAM MIWSi 20Dfi. 11� 5. ABUTTER INFORMATION OBTAINED MGM ME aTY M SALEM ASSESSORS AND W. 17 6. All UNDERGROUND URATES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND ARE BASED ON LOCATM C6 O�TMENT.ACCTTUAL L�O:AATOCE NS MUST OTERMIINED INED N MME FIELD..BCITY BEEFORERE DESWIN�C,PNC DGT SURVEY GROUP-NORTH SHORE (n FLOOD CERTIFlCATION: EXCAVANMx BIASM',INSTALLING.BAMWNE MIMING,PAVMNT RE NCRATM,REPANNG OR CD Z A DIVISION OF OIGIfA GECGPoLOHIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PLAN BY IXALWATM M ME L1IRRENRT PIWUCMLE FEVA NppD MM ROS OBER CONSTRUCTION SM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES MUST RE NOTA OF ISE% MDSE IN OUNIRtt Z O Z N M MUTES NOT Altl'AN M THIS PLAN ffE OIRN-C PN.ACES N 1963, NO HUSETIi QQ SCALE 1'=20' PROME 11M UEs YAIXIN A ZONE%(MEAS AS SN11NN NII BE 11000 Tei •pSI SAFE AT[WAGE INCURRED ME MMMULT OF M CROUPWITTED ASSUMES NO 10 CENTER STREET NFL 918-465-9992 N F J THE 02S RAM V.CO FLOOD RAW)IS SHOMN M SG NDN REgpµy®Ftt EM UANA66 INOIRIID AS A RESULT OF U1W11E5 OAf(lID M WACNRAIELY X Z U D 16� INSURANCE RALE MM,O]LNIUWtt PMA.NO.]SOU9C0419G WHIN 910wN fiSDPE NTURE CMNECTMS ME APPROPRIATE UIWtt ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS SUITE 1 ivfoOd9teurvey.c4m Il u - 20 AD GEMS AND FFFEMVE DALE Of ALLY I6.2014. MUST M CMSULNFD.� NEWNURYPO 01950 Nww.dgtsulveY�c4m LA.I U £ 0 ME 459X-CAMERON GROUP,MG 2O6 _ MW /3M9 ZONING TABLE' - PARKING TABLE RESIDENTIAL ONE RESIDENTIAL T'WTI.'. BUSINESS 371-335 LAFAYETTE - � REQUIRED150 5-7 NEST AVENUE 11 WEST AVENUE' COMBINED OTS METAL BASHER d SEANCE' 1 WAGE PER URS T GAGA FLOOR FAME FAMILY-(R2) NEIGHBORHOOD(BI) � - EBFABUTWENT SEA EXtlLDUIG STORAGE AREA= 1 1.500 ff/IN.10 SPACE SETBACK ' REQUIRED REWIRED - REWIRED - IX511NG EIGSIING MISTING E%IS71NG PROPOSED - nATAW�wT Jaao3 WMATS+4 EMPLOYWS(I PER NICO.UOT AREA 15,000 S 25,OCO ff 6,000 26,W S Sso S ),)50}S '42,058}S IZ056f S GROSS UgMtE ROOD AREA 4 AAM+1 PER 2 EWUOYQS5) NICO.LOT AREA PFR UNIT 15.000 ff 3wD ff - - I,IA S PER UNIT 3,0)5 f s, - _ - - 11 SAMS � M y BU9NEA Cff10E 160OD S w♦ $ MIN.LOT FRONTAGE 100 R - 'IN R 609 31018 R 64.00 E 10 R H218 ff' 44218 ff . Sff NR RODP��0I 16000 SF/I.�ff 3=IB W NDN.LOT YADM IN R -tOD R 60 R I6).Y(UFAYEIIE)/1219'(W6'T) 0264 R b}FT I8).)R 167.7 R_ 1 Nth ' RESWNAAL 1.5 PEA UNIT 2 GEM x 19 3 SPACE MAX LOT COVERAGE - 301 355 Olt 3501. 3521 - 1v 301, IBM - TOTAL REOUIROD 72 WAGS DOTAL PROMOm )2 5PAL6 U �, 1 0 T WN.ORN SAGE - - - - 5.71 .21.81 BOR " 221 101 1 I.8'-WATEFIE)/1.3'(TEST) 126 FT 1.3 mGT 10'(LWAYETIE)/13.0(WEST) NICO.FRONT YARD DOM 15 R IS R 159 m(MMANQ 0.0}/0.3'} IRSOVEAHANR US R} <I5 R 1.6'WAYETTE OWTAHANG 25'/120'(MESH - PARKING NOTE$: NICO.SME YAHI1 WIDTH 10 R 10 R IB R 0.1'(IAFAW:TM) 5.0 R AO R - 64.0 R - 1. E IM AN Ir LONINGG SAAB(ACING=OVEANDWPE SDS AIN 9' HIMAND NON-AMESSIBIE PNWNG SPACE5��BIDS 'NIA.REAR YANG DOM - JO R SIO R 30 R - 226 R - >30 R - - - NU . R NEM MOW=205 R} _ AND 19'10141 ACOL59BLE RANKING AND GOADING SACH N MGM 35 } MAX GUIDING HEIGHT S R 35"' - M R MAX HEIGHT=4Q5 R Y MAX NOWT-33.3 R 3 - W.5 R}"' :10 R NEA9JflE 0'MS BY 19'LONG 5 NIX DIAMOND STORES 15 - 25 is 2.5 15 - 2 2.5 - .:3 SIGNALS. - 2..E%6TING SITE CAN ACCOMMODATE 35-5/RANKING SPACES WN.WRONG Si 40 R 3D R 0 R 23 R 40 R 23 R : 1 NET FLOOR AFEA ERMUMS RALE FOR STORAGE,HALWAY% STARS.ELLVATGNS AND UTWTIES _ PLAN NOTES, . 1. MIS RAN IS PREPARES FOR OUR G GRIT USE O y FON THE SNADC ISWOSE OF OBTANING - f PERMITS AND LOCAL APPROVALS.AND IS NOT TO S USD OR RIMID MON AS A CONSMMCRW W / DOLMINT W ANY OTHER USE BY OTHERS WNOUT ME WRTMN CWSENT W ME YORH-CAMERON GROUP. / - 2 ZONING DSMICT BOUNDARIES COMMED FROM CITY W SALEM MING NM DATED AUGUST NOR.. _ - - 3 SEE VAIOANM AND SPECML PERMIT GRAMM BY ME SAFE MING BOARD OF AFPEAS ON . . NUAAY 20.2016. _ 1. All MA W1 TREES THE SUBECT REMISS MALL M flEOWD N ,E%GPT AS SYOFICALLY INEMAM NOTED HUMOR. S TRMNSIM S EMST.)RANSOMER . - - - FENCE ro 6• m INDIAN - DEIAOUTION NOTE ax1G WNPSIEA PAD AND F/ fE+ f 7 ERIC(re SYNOD _(FACE dGDB51E / ENCE t. ON PIAN�I NOSSOW AACCRAT�IES�SIACCILABBEE REERF�EoiN WYR�M WIINN Au0MEL01tlff NOTES 1N U7 E'./ sMEe7 -.r ST FENCE STAGE AND FEDWA FEGIIAngiS � q � Etas)iDNA m OM1)'REMOVED 8/ F B 5 HRw waEcr rAWWtt .i CURBING NOTES: - . PRoTECT EMS). _ O .y G - �AOOW.) PPE 1. MRS CRANINNC DUPING TO BE INSTAI£G FROM SMIR ENTRANCES m ME BEGINNING W 1 4 2 ENSURE VFAIICA GUMm GIRB BEMG RFM N MRU AAL BE STAG®W SIM AND WINES.CONCRETE . PEW.'wAl 3. CONCRETE CURBING M C 6HAPRECAST W E%IIHU[TD RACE. < v GW 9(NS n - - - - -COOP.CONCRETE - 4D.nCO3 l£G:ND MOMM1GO SMBOL C ti DMW AT APRON PRG. - g� / (PA4flAFNf / 17' PRW.O MW RI-I SOiEDNNG FRNDE tIY - 19' 21.5 AND RAN1E11 a SHE MIX 10 BUFFTA(11P.) IB m / io ® Q v 5' R5-1 SO Q a/ 4.0'Y 4 Y _ PROP.*w HANDICAP PAVKING } NOTE d 8An/PEW.RNfIFR CAR.am SALES k SIGNS k. 10 ,,�nI PROP.*WALL SIT MANUAL ON UNIFORM MAFlC CONTROL ONES ANY aAMAOH11Mi15 EZ� BED(TMP) P9w. LP V CAR,SIGNS HIGHWAY DWARYENT STANDARDS FOR ME LATEST SIO!SPEPACAROHS, > i/ BUIIDNG RC1 - - n� lE%T.gYFN510N5,CG11R AND NOYENCLAMIN. Q ♦/ b OWNIANG "Y q¢fpin k cm1XM 4 7A.^sv„ SIGN SCHEDULE - / PROP N1ED�Hs COAMEAG 1 mnINO ' ; 1Y ® (NOT TO SCAU) MGN. fWIPIBM NEA 4157E / `FI T . SlOSS ( ) 1K Q FTm+W ff ORRYEROAL J:- 7T Pta t- PROP. Z GJ LEGEND: Q FOA8,207 S Oilrti- o PAD gOROS RGON AREA:24,386 ff J. � � +a _v 4 ti f EIOST. $ - ® GTIH 6ASLN JCL C-) KNOW AND RELOCATE ETOS I - 2-FADIIY $ - 0 EN MAPOC SIGNAL BY OMS a I OYEIMNC m - O WAN MARMOT (COgDINAM WIN Ott OF SNEN) I bH I- 19' - O OSI 3 Y REYAN HANGCAPPED PARKING £a W0P PROD BIT.ir, : DNflONC rntm PANED MARK ROW 13- 6� n r: RIE RACK DOOR I' g : r PAVEMENT LV95FlRD sAes TO PARKING WACf COUNT M (TTP) J2 .: 1 y U R-1 -sMx enw3 + 00 USING Smi CRAM Q A9-1 xx RYI _ mrs BN BUWICM GRANITE MR 9.V a CONCRETE GMB 'EMM RIMMING TW MCAL PRECxS YS �cc WGP c We vcc My CC PINCAST CONCRETE DUE . . UNIT OF PROP. /W E S T A V E N U E """ - � VNTI�GRAMM GIGS _ SIGN=EA4NFNT (Bt) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J PEW.CGNG¢TE PRG.S YRNG AND GURU REAUGNYExr (PUBLIC-40•'MDE) oAT£WAr AAIIX1 . BY OMEAS(SE PLODS BY SFANMC PRO'.5'MS.:MMI SIOLW&K 8 I-- DAM Fffi 2016) 0 N CREAT WAN.WI✓8 I� - DGT SURVEY GROUP-NORTH SHORE ~ xl � - A DMSIDN OF DIGOAL GEOGRAPHIC IECHN01-MES, INC. Z M PLAN INTERSECTION MM"MEa u OARS SCALL 1•=N' - - 18 CENTER STREET TEL: 978-465-9992om (C00.RONATE WTN mr W DIEM) � U 0 10�D - SUITE 1 1nfoOtl9lNvrvey.com d i NLIYHURYPO MA 01 www.tlgtsWrvey.com OT 950 L NORM-CAMERON W".MG 2016 IrT PROM./5359 I J - Ga Gro heal) STORM DRAIN NOTES- sY: wawa DAIS 2 L/t2/2/12/IIF 6Epa]o1 1. SIORYWATER CONVEYANCE PIPES SlP BE 1r HON0• E(ADS N-121 2 SAWa STALL BE COMPACFED M 95x MAKMUN DRY DENSITY BY A IOE SANDY . FORLOON �y AASNiO T-180D MF]HW. - 14 Itil 1 w 10M4/6 3. SIEERNG,IF USED S BE REMOVED PRIOR TO BAWFWJNG TBENCH. D . 2S' FINE SY LEAN wOw\\ �y w - 4. UNAIITMIE ME BELOW THE INVERT S BE REMOVED ANO NEPIA,, W $ WITH APPROVE)MATES&AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS SAWD_ TREES TO 5. UNSUITABLE MATERIALS WALL BE REMOVED. FROM BENEATH ME Cid:2.5}5/4 SML £ EAST.TRANSFORYW flENWN' INFILTRATOR AWUTES D REPLACED WM tlEAN. WANULAR FILL a. o f SRTWM ®.. 9'NO PSS ENPAD ANDQ�ff 10 121ANN N4•BRE1N - MEETING TSS ASN CJ3 9'EM'CATWS(C°11WETE SOND1 U REM�r xv.-xx.J 3x]�ITYAYEDELT INN-LB7D �• I "'A �O CONNECT PROP.Ir HOPE PIPE '../BJ - 6. GTN BASH D GRAM MANHOLE RLN,M MAY NOT BE WUSTRATED- UC M EMST.ORAN MANHCNE W 1 "MV.-MOO - �.. RIP-RAP SLOPE rO U• WN 2950 EYJST.FENCE TO SE REMOVED 9 WMTECTW M BCAIE. C2 WI-OR VARIES y INV(IN}2J.10. wV 2415 FRAM WBECT PROPERTY d i / (dW 4') _ _ - _ pL1EONANVC TENSES OF Py y PROTECT EAST. W ] NEO-WN25E SD 8 .tHH�8H a O 1REE5 5 I / (EWE WALE) - EINE MINDY WAM O y g EAST.MUTY PORE W ° 3 J .( "` 'c I // LNv=z4B5 - GENERA TI TTY NOTES- KNOWa 8 COWMNATW WM LM?L. IM / - UTUIY CWPPNIES ti ° ASS .¢ � I I _� A I = 78]0« �5� 1 TIE CONTRACTOR IS WEC1KI y GMWm }IAT T2 WCATW D/W- W xo REu5A1 s ♦ ` 3j/y4 E ATIW OF EMITTING UTUTES D STRUCMBES AS SHOWN ON NESE 24•BREAK N WR8PLANS 6 BASED OR REWODS W VARIOUS UMW COMPANIES AND WHERE NO WSAYID GN W B 1 \ yy \� P059EI4 MEASUREMENTS TM EN M ME FLED. THIS NFORNATOR IS NOT- \ \ T 1 \\ MBE RFEW UPON AS BEMG FA.ACT W CCNPIEIE .THE LOCATION WNL - SIBUWCI CON \ •A �S I �\ UNOERMOUIM UTI RES AND STRUCTURES WALL GO vEmno N PF FTE!➢ - MtnS- GI��`` i By THE CONTACTOR PRIOR TO THE START W CWSIRUCIIW. ME & S=0.5x RM=31501NV(A)=RB 0000 \\ - CONTRACTOR NUSI CWTACi TRE APPRDPRIAE UTIl1Y COVPANY, ANY AS �w 3 f.eNW RIOT-LF MV(B)-24.30.MV Ch24.P5 \ \ OMH-21 2;�`�2N (3' GOVERNING PWNITTNG AUMGRITY. AND 'pCSARF' AT F ]2 HOURS - M—w` OF °NW a (C (B) 3R r WV(�z 51 f (• - UMJlTES D MM My E NO EER WALL BAVARON OW BEE KTTAE)IN MIND G W ANY UTWTES •0 \ WV.(Wv+24.48—J.r` MIEAFEAING WM ME PROPPED DSNSIRUCTW AND APPROPRIATE W°'+ I(" SHAM AMEN SHA�EWO BE DAMN BMEE PROCEEDING WITH ME MOCK R W miF INV( T}2{.85y f. r IEA\ �9�- \�\ II _�t-H ILMEE;M]TPLI SLT Wd(EROSON— WAll BE ME PE9'W9BIIltt W ME CWIMCttW TO RELOCATE ALL / I LWiR0.AT UNIT W NEW FORCE EMISTNC UIWTES WIIW CCMIICL WIN ME PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS g, MOM M WNSMMSHOWN OWN W VN.ME P - - w O e 2 ME EMMAETUR SlP SE RESAMMME FOR ESTAWJMNG ME / 3D '—{ -♦3260- S1� .. \\ _-- �` /♦ a 4 ), NAMTNNMC ALL CW1RW PpN15 AND BENOMAPo(S NECESSARY FOR ME 6 PMP.EDT J l lI Y 136 V�PROR.B•NO \ - ri r -\ I= PENCE 1 ME CONTRACTOR PALL WORWNATE WTI THE EUUCMC, CABLE D _ Y &N' a ry t N \�� \' �AARRIWNTS MP�IHE LO Rffi,, ME AND�TYPEM O�AI UAL MMPTY IwTM 2 RIWAk]I.ip\ �— - PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ME OWMACTN SHALL ONE SMD UTUTY m 1' MV.=25.90 \ \ 4166➢RNR CmTxM _ CWPNOES ADVANCE NOTff OR WRi THE UT611Y MMES OPLL BE INSTALLED. - Z5 .�.. tJ W�ESfAREHUE. g g AMP EIIYFbMQ 2MYEIVOA BL LxYMC / J'[1 II U¢ 9aU/IfJ Ga FmmTSNr AREI 8,15]s �/ 1- \ Pµ r WATER AND SEWER NOTES -- �D.N A fat FLOW-4.50U S COL06RML J6+ 3,65]P OFFICE 55,.. 1 I 30 SD+ } I. PROPOSED WATER D SEWER SEANCE CWMEMWS SHALL BE CIXWDMAIED m Q +3280 OFFOX .PROP. c C 3FMd FFlR].944 S OFFICE jN f ,,,,w MANSWMER DEVEMEER SSHA1 SUMMIT M& CONSTRUCTORORANGS�SNE WUmTYTY . _ W66 FLOUR NEA 24,388 P (: / ]/t ": 1.4 PAD CONNECTIONS FOR ME BMDWO FIRST ROW ETEV-ul'- �� 4 A. / I EAST. 2 A ANMUM W 10 FEET CHEM HORIENTAL SEPARATOR SHALL BE MAINTAINED / 5 r PROP.6IE 8' - ti uu� 3150P E. 2-FAMILY BEIWEEI SANITARY SEYET PPES D WAFER ARES UNLESS CMAMWS zW CASE TRW SEWER ) PROP A SaOO2 FT/1T 1 1F- I RFWARff.S RI 2 1 2 STORY ROMANG 10 SHAT A ORM-ATEMTO SEPARATOR EL 10 FEET.W WHIN C04 ME LWTRAC1Ui / RENAM OPLL COVWFM i0 NOT:N0.!BELOW. 35 PROP.5 Lf ` 2-FAMILY .u.5 1 ALL PAER PIK STALL BE POLYM CHORE PVC SDR-35 UATEA GST TRW!FT/FT \ ( \ OWflIING ( ) SQ02 FT/FT I'. / S pc® OMDiWSE NOIID. W ;32 ` tpmsGWFB sms NNEBB BANTAM SEWERS WOES WATER SRNI£STHE.OR A MAMUY W 10 FEET /3216 x q \ \ 99 �Jxx s PAWR 4 SUCH AN EI�ATON THAT ME CROWNT BE OF THE SCOW IS AT DEAST TO MORES s / ^ / 3x95+, +3250 `. MOW ME INERT W ME WATER RPE. IF ME ELEVATOR W ME $OPER 32w WRIER SHUT WF _ _ 3Y� -33 CANNOT BE VARIED M MEET MIS KWIRE101T, ME WATER PIPE SHALL BE IY wv aaA b p 'S J'— '-.. MECHAMCAL-JOINT IPE FOR A GpSfANff OF10fFET W-EAW SLE W TJE ' 2a 32]6 32 NCC 4DC J TREE i0 SEAN. ONE FOUL IENGM W WATER PIPE SHAL.BE CENTERED OVER ME D—.—'r RCKKw o 0' ° o_ �'' `@ >J- M. SEMEN SO MAT BOM NWTS OPLL ff AS FAR FROM ME SEWER AS POSUBIE w s rt_W—W � > _W °—° u—D—o—o— WHENEVER IT 6 IMPWSISE M WAR VEROCAL 3PARATON AS STRIUTW - / A_1�•w s s° s_ s MOVE, BOM THE WATER RPE AND ME S RPE SHALL BE ENCASED IN - WWEST AVENUE —y+ w—w w n w w—wv-W 55 / 4 � CWCffIE FW A MINIMUM w9TANff W Ip FEET FROM MF OR059NC PANT W yZJ $�w\ Y Ws Ur wr�m W —(PUSU SSU WDE)w_ s i g� 5 —s Yf 5—5 ME)MER PIPE l5 Eff.ASIREp NORMALLY WON All POINTS KONG ME PIPE G—c PR GM VKIE °A' G—c S W W—W "�W_ 4^ S. WATER FIFE AND SENOR SENVT£SMS AND LOCATORS MBE CWFWJW BY O/!N EW - EOP �2 — c— THE PROJECT Mm ENGMEF PRIOR To CONSTRUCTOR.AM WS PROP.PMR MAAMp£ N" Np101,.,z1x - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL• 1tiM nv.ni. MM-31M wV.(M}28W wu.Tvi - Z W id `✓ J 6 NVnxaJ Ir wv-mJ 4 V=I^ry J wv(WT)-2).9O Yxrv.-Me. J PROP.r=1(CLASS 52)EIRE SERNCE MSIALL mi WIDELY AMEPTW PRACTICES HURT EDUCNG FROMM AND WIMENTATW OPLL (USE TAPPING SLEEVE R VKVti) PROP.251E 6'PND(SJR-35) SAW W W SE EMPWYED M ME DE6ELOPNENT OR THIS SIZE 2 _ PROP.COPPER(TYPE N)WATER SERWZ, SEMEN 5-0.02 R/li ') Ll - T. ME OE\fLWNENi OF ME SIX HAS BEEN PVNHFD M MAT]I EMSiING Ll a n$ 1 CORPORATION STOP AND SHUTOFF VKVE PROF.GREASE MAP - - ➢E AGEDEM PATTERNS M THE IX HA BEEN PBIE. Q N R^B (SE DUAL) 2 90JMENT CONTROL. MEASURES WILL BE PPRRD M CONM% ANY J Q PROP.GAS SFNva(TYPE.LOCATOR, Z zN o g LEGEND: Slff BY 4A5 COWAN'() SUMENTS MAT NAT BE PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF SITE CDNSMUCTW a g ® AC . EROSION D TH DEPOSN W SEDIMENT OPLL BE CLOSELY CATCH - . . FMTESMONITORED DUNNG CWSMUCTCN. _ W w _ O MAN NP1MgE .. 1 TEMPORARY EAMON CONTROL MEASURES UUNTED M, FILTER FABRIC SLT FENCES, SILT I90O (S. BT BEEPING AND -UT NOT BE in Q} HDICAPPED PARRMG YMSTAHr°1D SLT SAOIS IN GRN BASKS (EXISTING D NEWLY - u) PARING TRAFFIC ROW PARING PACE COUNT 4. STE PF.ELOPNEM WLL NOT CWMENOE UML ALL MWGRAAT EROSIONCONTROL LsErLJ )D EMPLOYED MEASURES NAL PANNG DOR ADEQUASE TE E VMEASURES HOPS ME M +3200 PROPOSED POT WADE - - EMPLOYED I Hap FASTING SPOT WAGE 5. ONE SALEM ENGINEERING OTARM1M SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT(EAST 48 M BS BOTMN STAR - - - HOURS PRIOR M CWSMUMW M NPECT W09W CWTRgS M BE M EAST EAMNG - - IMREMENIW MAR CYNSTRUMON. EEV ETEVATOR AT FEETFS 7 TEST PIT m r10iwcuMR _ PLAN N Z EWj ja- V• PROP. PROPOSED - - '=11Y Z} d S - SAIE FEET WAlE:1 d'Q z VGC \ERTICK WPNIIE mmQ U O ME NORN-CMMW W GROUP.INC.2018 p 10 20 40 (.D Q F S a g . _ PI f1T59 . - - J-s COURSES CLAY BRICK FRAME AND COVER - - TO GRADE AS flEOUMEO _ - (S IFiIERO MARKED*SEWERJ 2 SQ.WOOD POST W O.C. WRAP ATTACHMENT CORD W �y AROUND Posr TRICE . . - � z'—{ PREMOLE CAST R� GONE SECnON POi91AfRRT OOD - SILT SACK NOTES:' - .PRECAST s' i� UP SLOPE 1. INSTALL SLT SAW IN CASTRO CATCH 9ASPI£INSTAL SLT SACKS IN - g RIND SECTOR NEW GABON BASMS ARBi MSiAL1ATOl. - U k 2. GRATES TO BE PLACED Own SILT£ACK£ AY 1- SLTSA(N ID G-BE MSPFCTED REPLACEMENT SM IND P£iRt ALL SRHN - 0• (�� ��° DOWN SUGI EwN15µ0 QFACNG OR RER.ALflIFNi SHPll BE PERFORMED WHEN DEPTH OF SEDIMENT IS WTHM b•OF GRAZE - b TABQ AT 35 F Ttr -w MCUE CATCH BASIN GRAZE - Y BIIUMM US SURFACE COURSE PIPE OM�ETR BURY FABRIC 8•MIN. IN GROUND 33 - Y BIIMNOUS BRIDER COURSE 5 2 DO NOT PUT SPOIL ON NETIAND g' p 900 OF FENCE - 9LT MIX - LEVET PRECAST ARG SECTOR BO)FS CATCH SILT BACK WITH OPENING FOR 15•COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE COURSE SANITARY SEWER RPE 1.SLT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AROUND UMIT OF - WORK TO PREVENT OFFSTE MIGRATON OF - - EEGMMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION. - - S PRECAST CONCRETE OR T•REBARFOT 1111=1111-1111=ILII-1 = n . . .• n EXFµ9CN - - SILT FENCE Ernwxr B G FBI ovA B (NOT To SCALE) - - - (REMOVE LEO Y LUOTDE �!0• . - SECTION PUN MAMOAEµY Wlgi M MAIEWALµp NEPIAQ 1. OUTEf UNVERT7IN S . NMM1H 0.10'LOVER SILT SACK SEDIMENT TRAP - - - -WITH s5x aMvnclEo Flu) - THAN N1BT INVERT. ' TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION z PIPE OJNNFrnOS TO MANHOLE SNw1 Q RADE WITH AWATER-TCJIT BOUT (NOT TO RATE) CONNECTION . (NOT TO SCALE) TYPICAL SEWER MANHOLE (NOT TO SCALE) S y2y . M`MSON MT 11'-0• p N 01 � � R SEALANT(NEN REOb) + r m - - TREkl TVARIES. - I Li Li VERTGL GRAMM CURS - °e MIMES - TAX MAY - 34.0 Cm Y CEMENT CORCETEBMWMC FAQ OR RT.CONCRETE PAVEMENT. (6'MIO'IN 0« FIXED OBJECT - 12' TIH COURSE(1 . wNIaIM AREAS) (Mn) OUf® W.W.MESH SEWACOMER E PREFORMED SOFE VANES» 90EWABK F%PµSON JgNT EMSTNG SURFACE 'I b «LSA(NAIL) o I tI=1111 C FlR91 1.OA(MM.) _ _ _ PAwTEIHi ILII IN III SAMT EWTNG BR. m 5 PAVEMENT AND TAM "� g _ - MAT ECCE PN1 0 111 I — I CEMENT CONCRETE rc S fi (SM0 PS-TYPE 1) - _ `>•_A OJENi COICEIE - Sy (3000 PS-TYPE 1). e'COMPACTED GRAVEL - COMPACTED(RAVEL PLAN NEW 6• 6- 123 BASE . (MIN.) tlA1PA[101 91HFADE _ - 0. R4 a FQ�B. w 34 0.� 6 -IBI_ A<xa9JI NOTES, - 1. PRONOE EIDµ90N JGNTSPULER AT NTN.3O FT.O.C.wTx 6.0 PVL PRE-MOULDED PULER. (SDV-JS) �ZF 2 PROME CONTROLROF JM I AT 6 O.C. - Mlat 4. CEMENT BRODM E SH IN BE 00 PERPENDIQIUW 10 CHB. VERTICAL GRANITE CURB - 4. CEMENT COlCIEE 91ALL BE 4,000 PS-SPE II. (NOT TO RALE) 8'OP C. CONCRETE SIDEWALK (Nor TO SCALE) - Outlet JU TREATMENT VARIES t ^ J Uw PRECAST ST CONCRETE CURB _ UM O�tlat Tee O Q N . I•CHAMPER - TACK COAT .p 2Q yµryl o�Eay RT.CONCRETE PAVEMFM TOP COURSE(1)'MN) - iM<t Tea Ll .SDR VARIES» ECCE - SHEA H5 O If EACH WAY RW AND BDT10N - _ VI" L{ gq LQ� . VARIES . � I O p f •� III i it 11- G•MN.Ca padN M L� + � _ EDGE car weN.e sta,. 1 I II EDGE NOTES: SECTION VIEW F/�G If 12• -COMPACTED SUSHAM M T GEAR 1Q PETER ENTRE CEMENT CDNCREIE 1. COICEE:5BOG PSI MN.ASTER 20 DAIS PERNEIfR �•%2•GOWEL SOt101S pow PSF E 1) - 2. DESRM WILL COME M WITH 248 MR:BOARD OF STALE ENA HERS OF PLUMBERS WEIGHT 91ALL EE NfMISHEO AT 6• 6• 11.3 MID GAS RTIERS FUEL GAS AND PLUMBING CEGE PND.PPPMCABI.f C1Y Q SPLEN I1FY N0,llt-M15000 22,&0/ _ 4.000 P9 MIN.COMPRESSVE Y S m LbK _ (MIN) COMPACTED GAM BASE MCGIRATOHS, P SRRENCM CONCRETE C WOK 1 DIA TO RE - 1- ALL RI NFORQMENT PER ASTM CIM, T-M15=C 24,71211 /2• ODMP TEO 4. DESIGEI FOR M-20 LOADING J SURGRAOE 5. SEE TO SE CONFIRM BY MECIAMML ENGNFEA. COMMERCIAL UNE GREASE TRAP (1500 GALLON MONOLITHIC) V1 W PRECAST CONCRETE CURB SET IN NEW PAVEMENT (NOT ID RME) CONCRETE DUMPSTER PAD - - U� O INE MOP(-CAMERON GROUP,,INC 2016 (NOT TO RALE) - (NOT.TO SPIE) SEE MAC PAD . - DETECTABLE PAD 6 MIO( ARM M - SLE n RAM D ROUNDER PVSTIC CAP WARNING PPO IOVEWAY APRON NIM - ACCESS flAW DETAIL - cd - - WOTEN 8WE NE91 (d .ro Rp�R _ A r 1 E�jL �g cl+asTE fnt u B a. 1111 g 6'STEEL PIPE FlI LLT MTH F"'I IOM6 `% CO3TE AND PANTED N WARNING NOT W p - h SEE - y < mum YELLOW - 4 O kLy$ pia PAR 1/4'MP l G TREATMENT VPRFS (�' o a l$4LJ - V-6'.(MIN.) Y-0' EDGE OF ROADWAY van - 6.-6-(NN.) Y 01A CONCRETE SUPPORT LOW SIDE TRANSITION A - NOT ME 1RNSTW IIII ° COUPAciFD(FAM1 1. ME NAIINUM NLOWABI£WEM'AV AND CURB RAW CROSS SLOPES SNNL BE Im(u MIN) IIII II � 2. ME MAMMUA ALLOWABLE SLOPE W ACCESSIBLE ROUT EXCMCNG WFR RAMPS 51ULL BE 5L - - — e — ]. ME MAMNUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACC SS9LE ROUTE MR RAMPS SHALL GE 1SX I� COMPACTED SLIBGRME 4. A MINCAIM C]FEET CLEAR SHALL BE MUNTuxEO AT ANY PERMANENT OBSTACLE IN ACOMMILE ROUTE P.E.HYDRANTS. : — UTILITY POLES.TREE WELL£SW£ETC) _ -S. CURB TREATMENT VARIE£SLE PLANS FOR CURB B BASE OF RAMP SHALL GE GRADED TO PREVENT PORING - - - I. SFE TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION FSR RAMP,CONSTRUCTION. - - B MW1S ACCESSIME ROUTES ME LESS MAN T M VADM(EXCLUDING WTANG)A W.W PASSING AREA S BE FRONDED _ AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED M FEET. NOTES: ry 9. WMNATE ALL CURBWG AT RAMP(OTHER MAN WRTCAL CAWING,MACH SHALL BE SFE USB)WERE IT ABUT ROADWAY. 1. 059 TOLERANCE FUR CONSTRICTION - - BOLLARD ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (CR) TYPE V DRIVEWAY APRON/ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYPE 'A) (NOT i0 SCALE) 'g (NOT TO SCALE). - (NOT To SCALE) 2C.MW, a Yi c MI'MAIL woo BCmm g BLUE BACKGROUND Mm STUPE(m.) TT .. 124'(TYP..UNLESS NOTED OTHMNSO I s OF p ppb R a � w '- - - NOTE- ..... .. - 1. THE SMOG MYTH CP ME PAINTED SMBC AND THE MATE BONDER MUST SE A NIMMIM MICOinS 0']',WTH A MAGINN THICKNESS CF d. k �\ I. PARALLEL SPACES SIPLL BE VXV. . 2 BLUE BAIXGAUND AND MATE BORDER ARE OPTIMAL. PARKING SPACE STRIPING INTERNATIONAL ACE' SSIBI THY PARKIN SPA SYMBOL W DETECTABLE N GPPAADD (NOT M SCALE) .. (NOT 10 SCALL) SEE NOTE 9 1/4'UP(NASI) En J A - OMAN dam. :5 e� 4'WHITE 571FING 2 B' bo IF—N' O.0 ATASAiEA IN (TYPHI.) Z 3(n o T 90EWAlNN AND. x g Q ti lai ® MR RAMP - CL ag NOES. - _ n - ]i/1• 'aa` LyI `nom 1. ME MAMMUM ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB RAW CROSS SEDGES SHALL BE 1.59(ISI MIN.). r w 2 TLK MAKYUN ALLOWML£SLOPE ACCBSBIL RW1E IXCWONG WRB RAMPS SNPLL BE 59 POST SECTION C M ] ME YAMNW ALLOWABLE.SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE BOTTLE CURB RMPS 91PLL BE 1.59 - N W MI 4. A MIMWM OF]FLEET CLEAR SHALL BE MNNTAMM AT MT PERMANENT OBSTACLE N ACCESSIBLE ROUTE N.T.S. B En T (LE:HYDRANTS,UMMIY PIES,MIT WELLS SANS•ETC.) - a S MR TREATMENT VARIES,SEE PLANS FOR CURB ME O M. Ery ESSI RI STANDARD !y4� 6. BAS:OF RAMP SHALL BE GRADED TO PREVENT PONDING. 0R M. lS & AWES ON P VEMBI 2. SEE TYPCAL SOEWA(SECTION FOR RAMP CONSTRUCTION. GLADE NUi ANO PNN1E0 W PAVEMENT 119 9 WHERE ACCESI6LE ROUTES ARE'LESS MAN 5'IN MOTH(EXIUING WRING)A W v 5 PASSING AREA LOU(WEER M SHALL BE PRONDED AT WTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 2W FEET.ELIMINATE ALL CMB NG AT GMP(OTHER THAN VERTCAL SLE SHIN.: V44R, 4' 9. WIRING,MAOI SHALL BE SST PLUSH)WiRlff IT SUIS ROADWAY. - - DETAILS /TB YAL10m ACCE55IELE sW SRaff TYP. la ALL CURB RNAPS SHALL COMPLY WTH 521:CMR MASSACHUSETTS ANcTTWCMRE-ACCSS BONA AND SCffW OR BOLT AMERCANS DISABIUTES ACT ffGhANAVS. Z VAN ACCESSWIE 'AM➢-STOP W-0'(TYP.) _ - SPACES COLT ' POST mQuNTIN4 PARTIAL ELEVATION �J N ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (A-CR) TYPE 'A' I < I (NOT To SON£) I. PAVEMENT MAY SLOPE 29 IN ALL DWEMM. N W z - ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPAGE SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE O £ o ME MC W-CAMERON(ROUP.WE 2016 (HOT TO SCALE) (NOT To SCALA U now./OY59 ALL DRAM MANHpE COMM SHALL BE CEDER G RUDE ASSEMBLY: MSTATIED TO CONFORM WITH ITCH OF Uff EWIVNFIGT ro E8W - ��' ///yyy ROADWAY AND i X OUR ROAD SURFACENWf1 NLL N118M800-2 RSES ro f(As RE MADE RIM (AS REWIRED) pRW0411 RNIBI GRADE EIE2 31.50E U k A1U TO EJ WY: _ b USE EWIVAIE41 ro 600 .ir PRECAST FLAT TOP MSFAL 10 CONFORM WITH FITCH OF NWR N0.VI416M6W-1 COVER 6 FRAME ASSEMBEY •y R N OR CONE SELDON ROADWAY AND FLUSHYE1N ROAD SURFACE 0 f-21 Y m s RSI'DIA .1 PoN ALRW `AST CLAY BRICK COURSES FROM :•TOP W RAMTLE CLAY BECK COURSES .y Z4 INFILTRATORo STEPS tY 0.C. - IM'=29.5 - T°FBpNm GRADE TO FINISHED GRADE SHA R (As OEORRm) PROPOSED FINISH(FIDE (AS REQUIRED) PRECAST PRECAST SHALL Y' .]xO RECT.NOTCH PRECAST MT TOP -6 'CONFORM TO ASWI N0.C (ke g EC I—"I - SO PRECAST MT lOP PRECAST RING SECPW � s gW 12111A1 BAFFLE SP LTRADON b 4�8L • r - �—OR COR SECTON o NWOm CAllEYSA. BAFFTE COIL. s f S PRECAST 12'ADS8' PRECAST RING - RING MOM N-12 NET i SECNW WTH - N jY''ll I�b OPENING FOR 6'BNFlE STEPS 12 O.0 • '� GRAIN PIPE - !'ELL z ., PRECAST CONCRETE CONFORM TO MANHNOR NAW+ TY ADS N-12 14 x� . PLAN WT-ET TO DWT-1 _ -b 8' SPEC N0.C 4]B-62A 3C11W 1N1PRECAST H •)+.EI ti S . •' - - - _ OPENING FOR BRAUN PIPE F 6 . fi'CWPACIED QIU51® 48 STONE BASE ' SECTION A-AY PRECAST_ _ PRECASTStiGINS SE MTET FROM OATH-2-WTIET 3 BIH OPENDIG OiAP SIDE OF 6AFFIE WALL I"A 1YOA - INW24.30 ig OCS-1 (OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (1)1 bf (NOT TO SCALE) STORE COMPACTED AK CRUSXm CCYPACTEB CAUSIRD WMA. STONE BASE ME 15.9lBBA4 C Rmama-um PAVEMENT(RWSH GRADE) - UBBA 8X14 G ME - 1�ECO.m1PoC CONE ffCBON MAY BE SUBSOIUIm TYPICAL DRAIN MANHOLE TYPICAL CATCH BASIN •'! T ' f'' (NOT TO SCALE) _ (NOT TO b 6 (MM)T-1( I (MEAL 6' F91VR WASHEDSIGNCRUSHED 6' i _ SI S cEatE Dc FRET AWSP) SECIIONDRAMIXC SGL I 1 - - (FOSS COUNTRY UIIIILR PAVEMENT p S C I I I I COMPACTED _ ll_°. FROM ROOF I 1 - f IAM kffEO ROADWAY SURFACE LEADERS 1 Y BA SRII j r------------------- PAVEMENT KCDON� I I POST > I � SFE DETAL 6 JI y m (8011 AND SHED STORE 9DE5)1 - TOO 95X MN1r MA°OIL uFlS( E COMPACTED n CONCRETE: I. - a PEE .SAND CUSHION(TYPE Al) Z. SIDE VIEW 5' (M.OF 4) _ V Mw.(EACH ME) NOTES - - MORRO GRANULAR FW PASSING 1/2'AND O Q RETE 1. CONC5.000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 2B DAMIANDSCMED AS gEp)Fm RETAINED ON NO 4 GE`.E(TRE A2) N 2OE9Wm FOR AASHTO IIS-20 LOAD.0 i0 SFT CDYFR. AVSPELTW PORI A (SIF NOTE) Z E/I 1 END k WE UNITS DO NOT HAW FIDW-THRU OPMIMCS - B OE RI FR NEE AND COVER TO FINISH GPFG2) — M EARIx p (TIP 1T N c .-C. .OF z) +;IIS-1 ~ - ELAN - III ' SUPPOCONRTS UK ME Sl SUBSOIL OIL FOR p LEDGEEms/ NENAND RENAL£OF I III - • III UNSIIITABE SUL MARMAES 3'MR OR M2 VRCHE m b ED GREATER TAI ILII-1111 ILII iE NOTE USE SAND WEEDING FOR WATER AND FIRE SERVICE .^�. MSTAllAnW. jrs FOR SIGNS m1D W411 FIF IN LANDSCAPE AREAS _ 0 RERIIRIFR R Z F= J NY Q O TYPICAL DETAIL' - a SIGN POST UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL Z W PRECAST CONCRETE INFILTRATION GALLEY - (NOT To SALE) (NOT TO SNF) U I.THE MORN-COMLNW GROUP.pt tole - (NOT TO SCNE) g PROD.#33% Plant Schedule _Po Q(y Key Botanical Name Commtln NameiNP Size. laA4� _ r o w TREES - - w0 a'SACERIA s•ew®bmpPHKMLmI 3HB Bewin nlSre Merl 35i -- { , 'BELM UlmrsamenCeRaVell Fo � $ 5 GINGIr1V LATER Nduml GeV PNu:m Gob Mzldenhalr Tien 354TH H duG Blydt 12-14r4J'i' Y _ •,�9a d ® - TYL` 9 f®p„p pp,rjp ly4p 411L' Glee We bla®nNosS ILre H A.uat 3'35'cN ¢A O .1. e, [MPee,10I - '2 RM Acer rvMun'RM Sone' Red Sunset MCPle 354bl 3 R pueaus:ubra - Red Oak 33.5'ce1 L 3 SCO Oueus Axonea Scarlet Oak 33 earlW ®. nine lna tae tlP@A9l+oea PWleAt1 - p _ ® 4 M ju,g / SHRUB PLP,NT NG - s"R BPJ Jum ms ch cess Slue Point Blue PGIM JwI i sb' b�kT+t ( 11 so" / SGALE: 2"=1'-0" - SCL cleure em mra sY.eel Pepper tsza• 6 'o' r 1 Z. 25 GG Gmnesubudmnrerl leer a LeMa5l cmaneeamr 1a24- V 47 COMP Cpnelwla rIRR Swaanere 16-z4• 'PA p p IiF3'r'D:p "mtu.TPOs'e,m""ix` 1 �N o B O` O 12 EG Thua 0R,kR. 8s S..d Emerald Green Prbrmtre BT pb o $p 16 BY Tame beasts mpardens Froish Spreading Ynw 18-24- CC 33 GLS o Ruse ::®11ce G-{ Gre m.S.S. t0-24' 4 y ''d• n N LL' y {�� 1HG1 Jnnlye eMnanw Helz CNumal HetEC.I. na Junl r SB - m' -:�• s - '..'• ,•'., � tO { po 4 6 HH PER aerate Hellen HNlers d..HNI 10-24• •A�� u �"`Tm � ��4�4' 16 IS Ier Blebs 5hamacK Slwnrtwk lnkDdry 2-2.5' �..f -- ® Y S - 1p,IY.PLMa-PLNrt I-]•As'/.R E18T1N66vACP SMIG Mlvabbledewssaw Slbeden Ureet C'. 18.24' pAty a.yy-pa ' " 2 15 PAV Thula eCadentalls enNYn pLJ • GR �Ai 13 RTD Gommeine Elegenllas:re Vadpeled RM TVAg CapwoW 23' ® :`°:-. �• Ll W/CAP (NOT to scale) 9'eM®OID BNrK MLCH 5M Nbumum Ili..MrshEd DeubACHMe Nbumum 2-3' /� L�/�s�//-�p�p 1E14T'r OFLV RP.I TDP WaP 3W Tama nedle NMls Nartawupright Ymv - 46' ATM]P✓!L's]L aP HaDIeaL L7 10A (Nat to scale) D - HERBACEOUS: - _ 'tie�°ya ' , _ vaalaALi atn lecTLY ON.1.mu. 101A D Arwm as Ircopa BOARmenm 1'N fp "i';A T BB FG Pennhelwnalrpea:Npdea FeGrins I'M]PPNR Paniwm WlAelum SwHICRlkh Gress tori 4'FOU - - — — — rime• 10 NHs Nde `tEle,steud bh 10al 6'-fII10E 1YHL-3%RHERI OORALL ( .POA'I RAL/Y PIX+E Nm WRa EUSI. RnimPNER pt11 YGRD e6C - fRLM TGP a'JLfl CP NL 6N13' ,you 8'MO'%MPSIER PAID AND P.N TO W.MNN IDD aMK IMLN b YpYq OH RAN O 29 FENIX ENMOSURE - <_ gg 3.RTp ® fIRETSa.1. a 3-PA 0 19W.RRBLG4RCFN A 2 TREE PLJ4NTIN6 - - e-Pa EJdsr. a ro az Ia1GMn - - - (�OETuU g L7 ,ME VLANT - - vPx,wn Pm _ T s maM ¢cT PaaPw FFileTONE m >» o 51 g Ewa PT THEN STMIW w PmTiwn m' 9 EY _ 3G - B Sa ENLARGEMENT PLAN av \ 11-ECi 0 5 to 20Or IF - .:V •mrrm rete y - �r> :_ + 2Y MISµSCHEQIING {{ 3.46 p. ® awaTHat - t T 9r F (tm.j u BUFFm day q rr role W -GLB AT AS PerIT [y, '/� RIP/llrbU/T® Q l 1 Ml 9 N rc n 8 g RICH. J- BEATING r�ntu:eme�mTOHa , GM .. �jA. fntH b'md I I ' PLIIJIER RET. BIHLLou.P.mt�,m t vz s:esPom tTmT'me a. TC 31 42 mW..•A�mso Al m.G i - - P wHu 4 IN 30.99 TEPe 1[Anya�� L ApyJ I -J z BullDwc 1 / - a FBe9T RCOR ELEV.•399m §1WV II Q .�I. i:- J^t, ({Ism-� 3 2GN _ CONGF£tE PAVfl4NT0 n II � { FG z/ S I ® r`• 3{PMILY - Q ^ CJS WIT PAVER IOiADER EI �aay✓t�mys % I 3 fi I L OVALNG M z D 4=1 n J TC: 31.6 / oR Idn�Pn AVIER HeADeR _ I I (l ` } `n yr Ei s lm JO a N g ..T ' � I ' W mNCL a tav" w4xser I C G VGC a r 'r IL - T — T J 01 IN E S T A V E N U E y(PT TRIM,P1D u] 4 et+ 5/4X6 P.T TRIM,STAINED M •(-� �,5^k�l P":nir5x".J.Rri,'".f'Jcas{ .®. ra mve,®dror e:a w.°c erPea.Pine cwoe<Tmron rtlmei 5/4X4 VERT.PTSLATS ON 777ASHENCLOSURE 3X6 P.T.NO./ 111N6 n� I .•; U (Not to stole) r�� La - . -.F, - PLAN !T'dip;y'P � �dlvpra�g$a SEE PLAN E lames keemAa ARCHITECTS manuel l assedates CIL _ 5CNE 1'm20' r -Y ga13Vs$'JY� YddY A�� 2 ee < - �� WEST AVE. ?p � 2 sbEEI CO 0 10 20 ao Mud ehW,MABtels Z SFENOE POST lel.(101)822-]1e] p d PL N77AV AT S7RW7URAL 502 a /\\ SCREENING FE/VC E as p1l6�sa B Ivr'e: er d�awel.am mm,m w dw 5 LI (Not to scale) (Not to sca/eJ ) D 1HE fqM-CPNRON(ROUP.INC.2018 PRO.L/3159 Luoinai[e SChBAule - 3 0l Qty Lalel I Ai[angamen[ Tial Lamp Lvmenf LLF peaC[1 tlOn - - 19 W51 SINGLE N.A. 0.300 AAL ALN440-YS-32.E-3R-3500 LOMENS CTO/ A-, -%% - B W91 SINGLE N.A. 0.620 AAL AGN 910-Y9 32LEp-3R-3000 LUlffN3 ES0/'N25-10-BU _ 6 P9 EINGLL N.A. O.B80 AAL ALN445-Y9 32LE0-3R-]00 NES/PE4-4E10-125 30-EL/TAA50 9L - 1 Pop BACtt-BACK N A. O.BEO AAL (21 ALN 415-Y4-32LC,-3%-]00 h.,PRI-4R10-125-10-pL/(31 TR150-BL 1 P3 SINGLE N. 80 AAL ALN995-T3 32L6p-3tt-]00 fl9s/PE4-9810-IIS 30-eL/TPASV-BL oAPR I PS tar� U C, 4£ lV al IILL V 0.a al ,y /� +Q6 L€g3 Glovla[SOn Bmoma 4 0 V-wg6, Label Cel[T a Unita An Max Nin Av /Hin na:/Nln 1�I 9 site Plane Site Plano Illuvunama Fc 0.a0 24 0'.1 8.00 24.00 - 4 s 111 Plme Plane[ Ill�vainance. Fc 0.11 O.S 0.0 N.A. N.A. - F'�1 aekin Onl Ill�minmce Fc 088 2.4 0.2 4.90 12.00 - - a ea n 9 ° F & N °� o m aq a. VS4YR� Smfk1 0.0 .0 5 °.l '0 0.° ..t ° 0.0 °.1N. El 0. 0. 5 1 __ ' 0.3 o. "z a 1.° °. os W 4Y 0 °6 0.5 ° .5 - 5 0.5 .r 0. o.l °.> °s oa I_. ' .e s .e 0.5 ffi ° ° °.° o.a N - S N 5 ' 0.9 l:n a ' W '�• °. .° - 1> 1 °a °a '�. 1. ° °. - aa z Inst =M 8 9> ° 11 Oy 0,9 1.31 W 3 1 > 3 a' 9D °.s> .o° o° - 5 aS, 0, - s SL- - 1 s 1.3 ° W W5 I ° a s.x 533 W 1.3 Q OS 1° a ° I _° W5L _ 1 I e to n I ° 1.45 .rAS. .a WSL - _ l.a °j - ° °0 f+YAu o °0 � PEc 1 s ° ° '""SuA°E° °LS EL SWP s °1 ° °s WSL 4.5 9 °3 a L > ° sTME Fs1fP -�Sz °° ° 0. x NkN ® - - - Iamw k.emrtulnuel I associates Z _® LANDSCAPE AataI.Pt3 F _ PLAN 20 M�M--]0m5 Q J a N m.Pep Bz3a2s3 =d _ a 10 20 w - aWai m" � o]uc ua+m-cnumoN uQauP.we xmE N ffi ' PR61(3159 - - - I Ltl % - ❑ - - - -- - - , � - IIII 111111 - - -.— � lI ISI - _ 4-IF�L i��- - - = -- - - - - - - - - - L M/JAN., ELEC., ELE I5/5/16 I � fTM�N WAfRDLF� - - -d�- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA 01910 93 9 918 -144 - 8982 PROPOSED 5QUARE FOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR 5,151 50.FT. SECOND FLOOR 5251 6a FT. THIRD FLOOR 1,944 SQ.FT. j TOTAL 24355 50.FT. A PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN - _ - . I I— LH - r7- FlTt�"IAN - - - - - - w EN - - - - - - - - � - - 'MEN,;- - - - m IP m II a-_a•� M/J I ARCHITECTS LLC 32 GI4URCH ST. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SALEM, MA 01910 978 -144 8982 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE 93'-a• FIRSTD FLOOR $151 5a FT. SECOND FLOOR 881 SQ FT. THIRD FLOOR 1,944 5Q FT. A PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR F'L,4N TOTAL 74,38850.FT. 4 _ 2 A-7 SCALE: 1/5" = P-o" " LU LL • _ .. - - - - - -� - 'WEft Fm >w� �U d - - - - - - t++- - - m _ 5/5/16 FI I MAN 4 WIIIIII ARDLE�T' I ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA m197O 9-fa -144 - 8982 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE, FIRST FLOOR0,15150.FT. - SECOND FLOOR 82;287 SQ.Ff. - - THIRD FLOOR 1,544$Q.Ff. �a1 PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR PLAN - TOTAL 243885Q.FT. — a-3 SCALE: I/S" = 1'-O" N- Lu Lu IUL . FYt.'F ELEVATIW lTOP65lIB-�) N 141®0.(bR ELEVATILN - ' ROP OF 9UB-RWRJ - ol I �. SECQ9 ROLR EIEVdTION A ' tl (icP[s f=II II II TI �l l74 W �/ AFRDLE n PisOPOSED LAFAYETTE ST ELEVATION_ ARCHITECTS LLG SCALE: . I/a•• = I,-0.. 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA 01910 9-18 -144 - 5982 74 — 4 N- c4� LLI ILII RC6 ELEv4Tld _ II 1� II RLP6Yl0-ROLE) I M�F�4 N f m T T!1 R[KR ELEv ' LOP 6 SIIB-0.GGR1 V' N l^'meq II 0 ^/) SECONDRWR ELE VATIGN • II � � li 6 YJB-0.00R1 F1 T�l AN W - WARIDLF n PROPOSED WEST AVE ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC A'S SGALE: /SII 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA 01970 918 --144 - 8982 - - LH i (tGP GF wB-RC6) IMIvp rima ELEvnna+ —�4 RQ+es we-rioow '9E[Y-T9 PLCLR ELEVATIW T RCP 6 P/ID-,_ a' WARDLE"r PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA ON310 9l8 -144 - 8982 .. LLI LLI .¢7CF H ELEAlVGiILN - rtLP 6 w6 -RCGP) ® - N MFFO ELEvdTICN ' rtOP W bYB-ROGR) 1^\fix TIN " � SECCND RWRElEViTKM. iiiiiiiiiiii Nil " (i4PW W9-fLOJR) " (( 5/5/16 F[ T r-I A��I� n PROPOSED R-AR .ELEVATION WARDLEE� SCALE: va„ = r-m" ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA 01910 915 -144 - 8952 331 LAFAYETTE STREET MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING sz Un 33 -335 LAFAYETTE STREET, 5-7 & 11 WEST AVENUE U €� (ASSESSOR'S MAP 52, LOTS 231, 232, 233 AND 234) SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS nE zm gp \ eRorcsEo V I/ tl // - COMMERCW. y < _ lllllllllllNllllll / / - — LAFAYETTE STREET 1� s WEST AVENUE' PLAN APPLICANT: SCHEDULE OF PLAN SET DRAWINGS: a CIVIL ENGINEER: - ROBERT BURR THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, INC. G-1 COVER SHEET _ C 331 LAFAYETTE, LCC 447 BOSTON STREET, US ROUTE 1 NS PLAN c/ C-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 75 NANEPASHEMET STREET TOPSRELD, MA 01983 - C-3 SITE LAYOUT. PLAN - - MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 PHONE: 978-887-8586 . C-4 GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN SURVEYOR: D-1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS I BUILDING ARCHITECT: DGT SURVEY SHORE D-2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS II o a to " 1B CENTER STREET, SUITE 1 -3 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS III a ��< . . .. - ARCHITECTS D iai - PITMAN & WARDLEY � - 32 CHURCH STREET NEWBURYPORT, MA 01950 L-1 PLANTING PLAN d Mir-- SALEM, ya6SALEM. MA 01970 978-465-9992 SIL-1 , SITE LIGHTING PLAN � PHONE: 978-744-8982 A-1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - rn SALEM A-2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN v�aia LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: A-3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN •raas* JAMES K. EMMANUEL ASSOCIATES - A-4 LAFAYETTE STREET ELEVATION c E Po° pffi 22 cARLroN ROAD A-5 WEST AVENUE ELEVATION N ami MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 A-6 SIDE ELEVATION � - ? .�* � LO3 PHONE: 781-622-7487 A-7 REAR ELEVATION ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FEBRUARY 26, 2016 ' N o REVISIONS THROUGH MAY 51 2016 o 0 9iE NdtIN-CMIFRW LAWP.INC 2016 LOCUS MAP N.T.S. - PROJ."9 SALEM LEGEND. - - - 114 BIT BNMINOUS - - FOREST AVENUE FOREST W FO MARK _WTWil HOl ON LOCUS COP EDW W PAVEMENT ,'1„•`) i PRO FOUND ll IP WON PIPE _ _ ,[]. 5 k ;0 j e RO s W WW R00 h TC TOP CURBING AV i1 e SgIEy 7k 3 9TAlE '1 AO U � � .. VGC 1EROCAL WRITE CURB .. - Q LYXIEW SP ( O ��F TRAFFIC MWi �iqm 33 c LEEDS MAP N.T.S. oOAS METER(W) fY wv.-ue �p '�mm0t 2rt915mm �q3F' COnWE,E /. GG ISW/ssId PFD 29_ m GR DYTE(W) p 1¢101]MO,v6NIAE NO �o . Mop.. --- o M TR�—FzOaRpMER�® CATCH BASIN W) \ © SEMTR MANMM(SAN) - - RECORD OWNERS: DETAIN MNMOE(0191) ° xc14i w < - /{ \ LES /IE'.t maAw tOmws Jill FAMILY STREET dY HYDRANT SEI /° 3 I /T� -�� d� 1 g ,51E sLpx N(rcq'p�p'� DEED HOOK 166!2 PAW 485 R 4 umw MWF / 3 $�' .'N.6 /ma m1c \(Bj�y(./�I 111 \'P� - �J PA CA WOVE e:UWR PRINCE k UTUTY POLE lfi 1 UWT / fen dW PAT9K 1m $ rine - / Sll� 1 .fee I IDEED 8 AVENUE955 PAW 113 5 4 Yt - / _ I 331 I%ESTA LLC ON .METAL POE(lP) anw W .]0— k mi _ - 5-7XBOO AVENUE - ° xETAI.POST /' � Ww p—� y G � 1 DEED BOW(364 PAW BI SON /. % % /� voM an,'w__�aw ` � jkg. I I ) I REFERENCES: `i®� MA4B0% / I �fea] J{g wh' nas lrtm mm- xill '29--\ I WN w,®Rw[k DESSEX EED BONIHI6 REGm a DEEDS TOT WAGE ' / I C �SYYYPrPPq 4 11 t wury Pwl¢E $( 1t wFsr gtiFrvu[ 9 t ORD BOOK 24030 PAW fVVVA W WA1ER IME DEED B013]66 PAGE ISO 01( 150 D DRAIN M E PI-AN 78 m / (IXy \ F N ]• //' .PIAN WOK BOB PLR 147 a g `� v'% PLR B W 9PLAN BOOK 51 PUN 113 Y Y 9 WMER UNE / / j ® -vw1n1N Lnua \ .Ne -//` PIAN 134 OF 1967 _ —uIw —EUECTWC UNE BI / N/F.11 fiiFflT,E[�RNS O�tlUMOOM 64' P4N 228 OF 19]2 Ie=s es mxt PORt%x a / PLR BOOK]BB%AN 93 B E c i .1ElEPHWE t➢lE ' / ;$/ w} 0.9101 SA9�eee mtl#°IOE52J EW \ yp SIC PA Gffi— GAS LME 52T1s>F wA ]nT RA e u xi/t12.W6E 6 cmv—OHIINFAD MIRES l 3 UI 3$2 [w691.¢ EW O ROES FENW /I / / JRM I N15M]YE Tam I � Rem � v JSP!IIS .:18 l.! ASYSSWs iwP/WT / I [5/ / { ® oom eai'9Y r� , vMA�lcl1 1 wg�___� `., - __ - . WL CWG ' �G tlOY 51FR 1.4• y'4l yv p/p T,,.mwx° / �.1 at5 VFAYEfIE SIEGE! I 1Td I H S 1,91Bt Sy/4 FMA u° ISE 5,6651 sq,fat -I 2 1/2 SrORT p Y 0.113±A. 1 0.1351 Aces X 'SCUD FflgME I MAEHY CERNY THATME BIA➢W W ARE LOGTFD R W WN4 RO TART n05 O.-Ww, m,[ $ H 2-fugLy - PUN IS BASED W R W-THE-W WND SURVEY RO PRESENTS AHE FACTS AS s,sPs at m1lc nt iiia/et - �i B OwflLNG u.9 fWNO AT AHE IME W THE SURVEY. Mg ma9Eur mar I Y T X32 1 fAAmcwm a,. ..nsttt 9f6 am Rex 9alR' aa9' San• a.M• O > CWQEEIE w Wi.CW[ 1xw— 4 YCC Q °—o —o ° o D �ss- - �S—A"T¢ W s=W3 s W .s— w—w —y�+-'w—w w—w—w w—w—w w w w— PROFESSIONAL LAND SURtSmR DaIE ~ y���� l Va _tip Y s—S—S �, 5 5—S-6�y- S—S 5 5 9— chi / I (RI) _ 1' N�� W12 RAW N W -o—W W—W W w W— W—W W �ce °D—c c—c YLa—c c-Uc D4 "sc—c cW cN-c EOP ECP 2 W °S - ey/ I ea-ssl °'91ssv W xv.-2. PLAN NOTES: - _ 0 :< wog 1. ME EMCT A ENUEITWB INTAINED M M ACT ALHEREONFW WR 3]I-]]5 LAFATETBY GOT AND 5,7 . SURVEYS ORE ON JUNES II k 2 2015 AND JANUARY 14.201�fgWED BY OGT 91HVM GROUP-NORTH M - N M 2 MAnONS BASED ON NAVU88 AS ESTABLISHED BY WS OCUMVATOS. N N MI 3. THIS PIAN IS PREPARED FOR OAR CLHTIT USE CULT FOR AHE SPECIFIC PURPOSE W OBTAINING PERMITS AND WC.LL AP ROVAL%AND S NOT TO W USED.W AE IM UPON AS A CONSTRUCTOR a. DOCUMENT W MY OMER USE BY OTTERS WCAOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT W TAE MOWN-C.WERON MOM. 4. ZONING MSIWR BOUNDARIES COMM MGM CITY OF SAIEN ZONING MAP DAM AUGUST 20M I_ 5. MUTTER INECRIAROI_OBTAIND1 MGM TE OTY OF SV EM LSSESSWS AND DO- 6. i6. ALL UNDERGROUND UM70 TOM ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND RE BASED OR LOCATORS W OHSERVABIE FIELD CVDFNW AND RECOWS DEFAMED FROM ME OTY OF SALEM ENOREERINc DGT SURVEY GROUP-NORTH SHORE N MOD CERTFlCATION: - DEPRTMENT.ACTMAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DCTERMMED IN ANE TO.D.BEFORE DESIGNING, EXCAVATING,BWMNG,INSTAWNG,BAOO (%WRING,PAVEMENT RESTMATW.REPAMNG W LD Z OTHER CONST UCTW.ALL UTMTY COMPANn MUST BE WTFTD MOMDWG NOM W CONTROL A OMSION OF OICRAL GEXWHIC TECHNOLOGIES. INC. PLAN BY E%NIWATON O TIE dIPo2ExT.Y APPMCRW RENTS FLOOD YR 1X19 Z O Z N W U1'DIG S NOT AT 1 W 1X15 PLR.SEE WRIER A0.ACTS M ASEAD NASSAWUSETIT. SCALE 1"-20' - ME 02TT UFS YATMH A TANS X(AREAS AS SHOM TO BE ROOD CALL'DIG SAFE AT 1-888-3N-IIA T1iE MOWN-CRFRON CROUP ASSUMES NO - 18 CENTER STREEF TEL 978-465-9992 (n—J THE RA C MR WRC iUNT PMN)R 52500 W TIE ICH RESPONSIBMY FM DRAWS INCURRED AS A RESULT W UTUIES GRITTED OR INACCURATELY 1^, 0 d V �p SHOWN.BEFORE FUM CONNECTOR$AHE APPRFPRATE UTIUTY MUNRWNG DEPARTMENTS SMILE 1 Ems' intDOdgleurvey.com jR Z d i D 1DI�1 2� INAIRANW RALE MR.CC091uNIlY PREL N0,25W9CD419C MHIW '`-11T w AD BEARS RO EFT£CTVE DATE OF JULY tfi.2014. MUST BE CW WL1W. NEWBMRYPD 01950 wW.d9lsurvay.com W U £ O TAE MOWN-CAMERON MGM.MO=6 . PROd EAT59 ZONING TABLE PARKING TABLF RESIDENDAL ONE RESDOITIAL TWO.'. REQUIRED @Jl9NES4 331-335 IAFAYETIE Fr]WEST AVENGE -11 NEST AVENUE COMBINED LOTS - 19'AW PFR 150 SF MOM MAREA R FAMILY(RI) FAMILY(R2) NFm;HsmHOOD(BI) $$EEC. RETIC STABIUM E sERNCE ARFq EXQUOING S10RAGE AREA= . _ EnABIISMENi . 1.500 9'/150=10 SPAflS SETBACK REQUIRED REWIRED - REWIRED EXISTING EASUNG EASTING EASRNG PROPOSED - - - Sfi SEATS t 4 EMPLOYEES(f PER ^ � )li RESTAURANT,3,NO ff a x wN.LOT AREA 15.000 S 25,000 ff 6,m0 26,443 ff !,W5 S ],)50 t S 420583 SP 42056±ff MM Uccw c 6i AREA 4 SEATS 4 I PER 2 ELTEDYEES)- O li ON.LOT AREA PER UNIT ISMO ff J.Sm S - - - - 1.486 SF PER UNIT 3.875 t 4 - II SPACES - �^^„``4 ,Mk .� VIN.LOT FRONTAGE 100 FT -100 R BOR J1fl4B FT 60.00 FT 40 FT 41218 SP N218 5F BUSINESS OFTIM 16,000 SF 18,000 SF/1,Om W.A J-4B W E�J 8 ON.LOT YNIM 1O FT NCO Fi fi0 R 10J.Y(IAFAYETTE)/1219'(N4T) 8254 R 10 i FT .18).)R tn.]FT O Rom NiFA(J) SPACES RUNDFNTA, IS PER UNIT 2 UNITS x 1.5-3 SPACES i MAX LDT COVERAGE 3n J5; Uta JS8% J5.2R ICON± JOS 19.55' .. MAL REWIRED 72 SPACES . : miAI PROWOFD ]2 SPACE - r ` a� o :y MUL OPEN SPACE - - S.]X 21.8R an 221 in - `/ �J 1.e'(LAEAYETTE)/u'(NEST) Axe yr as R is NEST 4.v(IAFAYEIV/1JA OICM - - PARKING NOTES: A MN.FRONT YARD DEPTH 15 FT 15 FT 15 FT B oNDwM+6 o.e•z/6J•: TO Ow ANO 1z0 FTs - 1 fi IAFA)ETTE OwWu<c 20/1za'(wCD)YW..SOE YND MOTH 10 R .10 f] - t0 R 61'(LAFAIRTIE) 5.0 FT <10 R - fi4.0 n - 1. WOEAOR 11 LOONING SPIN A V MOH IAHO VERH BOOS ME 9iMOE ANO IY LONG MMA 2'VE10CIE OVEPoIAN6 All ±111z.OTHER NON-ACCEMBIL PARKING SPACM MEASURE WMIE ((' O MIN.PEM YARD DEPTH 3C FT - SO FT 30 FT - - 228 R - >MI FT - - AND 18'IDN6 ACCE59BIF PN60NG AND IAMWC SPA05 iy¢y MEAN VOCE-SS R t MFM WDW.RflS R t - 165 R t b FT - YEA9IPE 8 NIDE BT ISE LO6 . . F by NAY WRDMG XDCM JS R R n W JO FT - _ MEAN HEIGHTO - 35 TR t MAX HEI(91T=J33 Fit - _ NAY BUILDING SIOMM 25 25 0) xS COS R 25 J STORES 2" USING STE CM ACCCMNWATE M-37 PAM(WC SPACES NUN.BJIOfANC SEPARATION b FT - 30 fT y R 2J R LIO R y 1-NET FLOOR AREA ENCODES SPACE FOR STORAM HAEIWAY$ ID _ - STARS,EIEVATORS AND . . .. PLAN NOTES: . t. THIS PIAN 5 PREPARED FOR OUR WENT USE MY FOTHE SPECIFIC PURPOSE O ORTAWING n / PMMIM AND LOCAL APPROVALS,AND 5 NOT m BE USED O HEAD UPON M A CONSTRUCTION / - DOCUMENT W MY OTHER USE BY OTHERS MMWT INE NTATISH CONSENT O THE MORN- ERON CROP. _ It _ 2 ZONING U MCT BOUNDARIES CWPILLAUDI MNG FROM.CITY OF SAUDI MAP DARED AUGUST 208. - _ - 1 SEE VARIANCE AND SPECI01 PERMIT MAKE)BY THE SALEM ZONING NAA)OF MPEYS O JANUARY 20.2016. 4. Al EYETNC TIMES yATMx THE SUBJECT PROMISES WILL BE REMOVED,EXCEPT AS SPEORCALLY 3 Nx10 - NOTED HEREON. o TRAX9TO 4' EAST.TRANSFORMER _ - FExW m 6• m NEMMN _ DEMOLITION NOTE: d # 2e SNIO WYNC ER PM AND g FIEOEna xooR03rr FENCE ENWOSAE 7 FENCE 3 MONG )!J�PROP. 3R]CVArmF sIR6T /c - ✓ t. OON PLAN."OOUTION ACTMM SHALL BBE PERFRFONR➢IN COMPLIANCE MTN O.AU_LL�HO1FD Bt " g"ST.FENCE m BE REMOVEDSTATE MD FEDERALFRO SUBJECT PROPERTY _:ROTE CURBING NOTES.PCT EMn. PROPOSED IMOSCMEAREA(TEP.) 1. VFPRCAL OVAMIE FARMING WPwNG l0 BE INSTAILEO FROM SIREET ENIRMfA TO THE BECWMNG Oz, - •.' e 2 Ep�STING VERTM GIUMTE CURB BEING REMOVED SHALL BE STAa®'m SINE AND PE 1 .jg •. ..... " , 'SMAll ] WNCREIE CIARDNG SHAL BE PRECAST OR COMIDED M PLACESONS OEIEM.U.LCO.IffENO MOM - f04MT 5YMp0.OPIVEWAT APRON PUOR PUi ` 17' SING FFEENQJOAND RANTEDPROP. > Qi1 & BUFFER(m) ANNE RAa �(++ Diob .. R5-1 JO' 30'- _ �r_.y.f_ 1S 12V - e ^HANDICAP PAMONC T.RAHiFR CPIY S6HYALL TA.&SIGNS 4� 10 * ./1 PROP.*swu ME MANUAL ON UNFOM TRAFFIC CONMO DEWCES AND YASSACHOMITS(TIP) - PRS. F - Y CM'SIGNS HIGHWAY'DEPARTMENT STM9MD5 FO THE IAIEST SIGH S ECIFICATOSBUILDING - - M/T 1FJR.DIMENSIONS,CmOLt AND NOMFACLATUM avFAHnxcSIGN SCHEDULEIN 9, 1Y ® (NOT TO SCALE)33MXEn-USE COMMFROLAL BUILDING , ^: L' 6CIAL �, "Y( p. p¢ : TRN LEGEND:2nd fllb SIF ff OFRO 'P 17 TRANSPORHrtR FFR-].9H W RRCE „ .Io.I ' PAD24.]88 S - j' ^� b .:� ITT`nREMOVE AND REIOCATE EXIST FMS Y $ CATW BXSNTRAFFIC SIGNAL BY OTHERS - DNEWNG m OMAN MANHOLE ion O LjyC-]U (COOTmINAIE MTH CITY OF SADI) + I' 19' O Qj 21/1 STCWY' REMAN - - Z UIQ NVGO FRAME HANDICAPPED PARpxG Q n PRM PRW WPPO C, nOLUNC IND `���' PAMIEO TPAFRC FLOW d g lllll/ r” BINE RACK DOO I,: PA4EMENT IwK3lPaN 51FP5 )D. PARNWC SPACE COAPT IeJ l I SSA (TIP) i m )' itME Pnm *JIM DVJINC SPOT DRAW N Q rc M 4 Y �1 RYI w.ss ON BUUNOSE GRANITE CPB N Q _ A V CC CONCRETE mm P. ..l py.& Nnm' EXIST EGSPNG 7 FT FEET _ 1HFF m TYP TYPICAL SCC VDC YCC vFc - vz WT. PED PCC FiECASi CONOETE COED PROP MWOMD L UNIT W PRO, wNN - VGC VDITCAL GRANITE Cum 9DEWAlI(EASEIIEMT - (Bq e� — — — — _ _ _ _ _ _ JJW E S T AVENUE PRO. CONCRETE - n PPO.STRIPING An CURB REAUGNMENT (M) — — — — — I,� (PuSUC 4W MDS) ORAI A 04 BY OTHERS(ME PLANS BY STANTEC PROP.5'MDT COG MIEWN-H $ DATED FEEL WO M VENT.GRAN.ORB I s DGT SURVEY GROUP-NORTH SHORE - ~ 0 PLAN o A DMSION OF DIGI]AL GEOGRAPHIC>ECHNOL(H:IES. INC. �-L M I -20• IN1EPffCTO IMPROVEMENTS BY OTEAS 18 CENTER STREET TEL: 9]B 465-9992 (mODWATE MTH ott W saDl) (1 J J U SURE 1 I`p—']1'' I...dg u,,.c.VI d 0 10 40 NEWBURYP001950 www d9burvey.cem g g O 05 TIE wWIN-CAMERA IAmP,INC.2016 PRm EJJ59 . - SOIL ZEST LOG(TPn) - - STORM DRAIN NOTE_ • Br: ul DAri /2/ DAM' 2z1zp6 - - - 1. SIIXUIWAIEA CONVEYANCE PIPES SHALL BE tY HOPE(AM N-121. O. 2 BAgIRLL SRM.- BE COMPACTED, 10 955 MAAMUM PGT WNStt BY k 1Dm2/2 . - - AASHN T-1BOD MEMOD. 14. EWE SANDY LOAN rl F'I p - - B.tams/e - O r 5ms 3. SEEING.IF USED,,SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO 9AOOT3NG TEAM �- ME SANDY LOAM Uy . 4. UNSUITABLE SOL BELOW THE INVERT STALL BE REMNED AND REPLACED � Z3 A - . - WM AW ROVED MATERIAL/ND,91All NOT RE USED AS BA FU MEES. REMA TO 5. UNRETAME MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED. ERN BENEATH ME CIE: 25T5/4 F O [aa -EAST.TRANSFORMER flEMAN MTRAnON FACUTES AND REPLACED WIN CLEAN, GRANULAR Am MLT LOAM a� ¢3=W YXIO'DUM�PSIER PCE ORMO 10 REMNN N4'SPEAR MEETING ME ASTM C33 S'EORCAMAS(C AMEIE SAND). U ] 16 XY�22e .. fAFLEPM]I ISYI1105Kf {8-z COUECT PROP.12'HOPE PPE a sn wv sIMR RIM-28.70 B. CANT BARN AND DRAM MANHOLE RM.S2E5 MAY NOT BE ILWSTRAICO Sfi- - IW 6 TO EAST.DRAW MANHOLE T-13 -WV.=25.00 .A, - PIP-RAP SLOPERIM- M SCALL. NV 24.15 FROM SUBJECT PROPERTE)AST.PENCE W BE Y B PROTECTOR C2: O40R VANIF9 r - g (E50=4-) ALTERNATING LENSES OF 1I'�•11 �A�Ei i_ 44 PROTECT EASE. METH-COARSE SAND @ O Y E5 O "w TRUES 5 �_3 - AWE SANDY TOM Y O££gk u e ' . I R1u=z7so GENERAL UTILITY NOTES- REMOVE - %. (t--a'MCIt) _ 5 `y EAST.UTLLTY POLE IN COORDINATOR WM LOCAL `1 I \ 1 ME CNTMCTN IS SPECIRCIllY CAUTNED MAT TME LOCATION MOM HONO REFUSAL BAT)GW uluw COMPANIES f3 - d A ai ♦ \�/fro za50i' ELEVATOR T EASING UnUEES AND STRUCTURES As sNON ON MESE 1a 24'SEEM IN CURB PUNS IS BASED N RECORDS OF VARIOUS MUTY COIAPARES AND WHERE BE 1 \ ,yL S'\\\ -_ 10 FILED UPON MEASUREMENTSPOMBLEBEINO�EMACT ONCOAIPIEIE US 111E SROCATION 6 NP11 . au9] ��'� • P!: ' �I I I iuvf SnNCNRE \2 �\� I �\ \ UUNDEBY RIGROUND U FIETOR ANDPRISTR CTURE SEAR OF COxSTiRM MEOPL FELD 0 ' RW=3150 WV".1'1��20,QMO0 \ "-- - �i - CONTACTOR MUST CONTACT ME APPROPWATE UTIUTY COMPANY, ANY Mw; drW �10>-If (8)-24.W..1.M.p21.45 \ \ D�2) kU--]"IY GNENNE PERMITTING AUTHORITY, AND 'NOSN£ AT LEASE 12 HOURS E O OUw��� LOCABON OF (B) 3\ -- WV.(N)p2A51 f I• - UTIETES AND ME PRIOR TO My NGINEER MALL BE NAVAAON WORK TO MED N WANEST EXACT G OF ANY U14111ES RW 0.00 I 0 5-055 NlE%FMNC WTI ME PROPOSED CN91RI1ClIN AND PPPROPPoAIE INV( ) 21(0 !(a) REMEUAL ACAM SHNL BE TARN SERME PROCEENNG YAM ME W .IT 3 1B.•Y J / wvh DOE, INSTALL SILT SOM MON- SHALL BE IIT RESPDNS&HITT OF TILE C WCTOR TO RELOCATE ALL cONTRa AT MIT OF NEW FEND: EIDSTxc unI111E5 xwCH CONTACT WM ME PROP MOD NPROVEMENTS I PRIOR TO CIRHSmucnN SHOWN ON ME PLM. az22 aw \ -I \ \ 1 y 2. -ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPWSBI£ FOR ESTABUS9NG AND QC�� NWM�NITAIMNG AL CON1H0. POINTS AND BFNNMN06 NECESSARY FOR ME Q 33.30 \`- ,�l\ r PRT.SBT _ - 'I \ py ti^- -\ \ //____ 3. THE WNTMCIOR SHALL COORDINATE SAM ME EIECIIdF CARE AND yy EA PENCE V FWOP.6 HOPE \ `Q �"' Nt -k 136 -R S-0Z \ 4 �'� S \ 1 _ _ VEPAR 1 TO VERIFY ME OCARON, STIED ANDD TYPELM .MUNICIPAL MULES > m m y - I. - 5 2.05- 1 ATM-CIS \ PWT TO CONSTNIRCTIN. ME .CONTRACTOR SMALL GIVE SAID UFUTY ' 3 •" a _ - .COM=31.10 \\ NA COMPANIES ADVANCE NOTICE T NEN ME UTILITY LINES will BE INST7AUm. R INV.-2500 b 1 6 \ aescom x%mxw AnXETY IalY_y..CMyRbAL Ryes. / 1\\\ F \ U�j IT WEST P)D,TPRNT AREA 41W s - \/ \ M \ b\ T - WATER AND SEWER NOTES- IM RA 485]S OFiGA1 x5 a3ieo `�. q i \ 30.50+ ? pCOj, 1 I. PROPOSED WATER AND SENA MANCE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORmWglEO FLR^B,2Hl S Of51Q I' _.� - 7 _ 1RAN9"gOOR CODE sLwEEA H ME SALEM ANSI x I MAL�CON�STR�ON DEAMASS�UMEOUARM kE FIA AREA, 9"OM[E I,F PATI CONNEMNS FOR ME SUIIDNO 4 GRE55 FLOOR AGFA 24.814 - j_ I IAM FII6T BOOR EI£V=3110 - / EASE 2 A BETWEEN T 10 FEET IER.W PES AND SEPARATOR 41LL S EMMNNET PRT.B IF B- / I -� SO A \ 3150+ ' MU2-FAMILY NIG 9EEVENII S ATEA. SEAR PIPES AND WATER ROES UNLESS COmIA0N5 CAST IQ.N SEWER 1" REMAIN M PREVENT A U1ERN SEPARATOR OF IE FEET,W NIDI GAS:ME CNTIUCIN i i' I REgIPACE � 2 1/2 START REMAIN SOUL CONFORM TO NOTE N0.4 BLLOW'. l \ I I ISE DETNL) \ " w9ED FRAME /(!p/] PRDP.5 If 6.ER \ I- / B 2 FLNLLT 1 ALL SEWER RPE 9ULL BE PoLri1NiL CHLORIDE N COST o.w SEWER \ i- \ \ \ / OYFLLIrvG eaao OIHFRWS NOTED. OLdOE (PVC) SDR 35 UT1E35 �, SHIT, - 4. WHERE SANITARY SEWERS MOM WATER SERVOS,OR A MIMMUM Of 10 FEET m K Ayl( 4 Z ` - i ....... LATERAL SEFEAM3N CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. ME RN&Q BULL BE LAN ATSURN AN m s /1216 32]8 8 r \ _ \ 9 wuL PAN .BELOW ME VERT TAME WATER RPE.T ME MOM OF TIF MME�ETEVSARON AT O ME18 NS EER F / "YOU S - f 329 f \ / 3295+.:+]250 3Y: -3S - CANNOT BE VARIED TO MEET EMS gEWIRmMNT, ME WATER RPE SHALL BE - # Az WA1ER SHUT OT TED- MVCHAMICCACA TI -PIFT FOR MI5 SEPARATOR N CEACH SOLI WHE N� y.; _U.4'.( - NII' SEWER. L-UgNi%ff EOR A DISTANCE T 10 FEET ON EACH SDE T ME IY wv.-]x D O ' a 3574 3250 NGC VGC RA 10 SEMEN ONE NLL JOINTNGTH T L BE PIPE SHALL M CENTERED FA )IFR TM IS paw.w- . •' VVENE SO MAT BOM JOINTS WLL BE AS FM ARCM M SANER PS PASSABLE 1Y 0 -4' n G-n-G--'4"l- 0- G- �. ABO E B IT 6 E WATER 10 ME Y SEAETt SF WALL AS STOMATA➢ s s -wlvc ww G WEST AVENUE !�i�Av .s DGe.s-G . o-D-D-wo= Z w.,� �.ar NA ABOVE, BOM ME WAiEfl PPE AND MF 9lWR PIPE SNgLL BE ENCASE➢N yA Yss 3-N_-w w-w-w w w-w ME)THE ECW A S MEA DISTANCE AL 10 FEET ARAN NT CROSSNC PONT OF > w IY wVm _w_�WBMC M NfDE)ws_ s s-s�s s s- ME)MFR RPF AS IffaSUREO NORMALLY%iN PLL PgN15 ALgNC ME PINE Q M1E�ALNE W- W N �W M-x _ 4 A G-c c G-c w c-G-0-C-c- 4-G w � W- 5. WATER,FII2 AND SEWLV SEANCE SAS AND LOMng15 10 BE CU."FIRIAEO By ~ ECP EW 1 -c-0 ME PROJECT MEP ENGINEER PRIOR TO CCYSMUCIIN. x+ �/� G G - w 33-- OWN 3-OWN FRT.SEMANHCIE SUH N AN.a3 s wv.e].I RIM=33.0WER%AVON 28M PM]2JI sul•3x I2 - ER951QN AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. Z INV(OUT}27.00 e'uu-ua ISTASUL 1� n .PROP.4' SE (PLASS 527 FIRE SERVPE WSFALL CB BE EM ACCEPTED E OEWI FARPME ATOFREDUCING LROSM AND SEOMEMATCM WL �I (USE EAP%XG SIFEAE @ VNVE) PRT.25 O 6-PM(SUR-JS) SAO(N® &EMPLOYED W ME pEVE1TVSHT T MS SITE. n PRT.COPPER TYPE N WATER SRV S£W1Dt 5-0.02 FT/FT - (TVP.) _ ( ) OE, PRT.GREASE LAP - - 1. ME OE\£LTYWT�ME SITE HAS BEEN PUNNED M YA1T EASNC / I Q'flPTA PRI STOP AND MCI(( VPLIS _ a PRM.GAS CANOE(TOPE COMPANY. (�OETN) - � DRAINAGE PATTERNS M 1HE Ew1EM PRACTICABLE ASIS. 2 SDINENT CNMOI. NEASTES NLL BE AFPUEO TO 0.TIINOL' Oxy Q LEGEND: SIZE BY CAS COMPANY) - SEIXNFNIS MAT MAY BE PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF 911E CONSMUCTCYg . AC11V11ES EROSION AND OEPOSTN T SEgMENT WILL BE CLOSELY ® EL CATCH BASH MOMTCI+ED WRING CNSmUMN. W O MAN MANHOLE .. 3. TRAPARUNITEDY EROSION TO. FILTER FABRIC SILT M iFNTS Wil NODUM.SUMS, BUT SEEN T BE 'HMOICPPPEO PANNING - MULCHWG, AND SLT SACKS N CATCH BARNS (EASiWC AND NEWLY N INSIAMID). y_ PNNiFD MNEIC ROW - - - 4. STE WMIOPMENT NLL NOT COMMENCE NTL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION mal t O PARSONS 9'ACE COUNT _ - FA L EMPLOYE) NTMAL PPLACE E E MEASURES SMALL RE Ml q NG AND ADEQUATE1E(£TAAON HAS LEEN .32.00 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE - - ESTABOSED. - 1 awm EXISNG SPOT CRUDE - _ _ 5. ME SALEM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WALL BE NOTIFIED AT IEAST AN M BS BOTTOM SEA. - HOURS PRIOR TO COMMUCTN TO INSECT EROSION CONTROLS TO BE h - - IMPLEMENTED DMWC CONSTRUCTION. ELEV ELEVATOR FT fT FEET7 TEST PIT TS qj AR rn TOP PLAN Z 0}d PRN. PHLANEEF SCALE' 1->•20' Q Z 1--. o U 4 SO fF£i AGC VERTICAL TANIIE CURB _ 0 IU� - Q F 20 A i O THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP,WC 2016 - z ff PROP(.1359 I-5 COLI QAY BRIM RINE AND COYER . TO(RAW AS REWIRED MAPoa:IED uA o'SEsErm9 L«M 9 POST 6,DO. WRAP ATTACHMENT CORD -. . - 2, _ PRECAST AROUND POST TWICE .. CONCENTRIC PNClE XON - - - CONE SEIMM POST SGHELY - SILT SACK NOTES _ PRECAST fV y UP SOPE 3 1. INSTALL SILT SACKS W FASTING CATCH BASN£INSTALL SMT S=S_IN - _ ¢ MIND SECTON _ y Yl1{ NEW CATCH BASINS AFTER INST&1AMN. _ _ _ U Ap T. GRATES m BE RACED OVER SILT SNO(£ I-. MTSACN SHALL BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY AND AFTER All STORK DOWN SLOPE EVENTS AND CIEAMNG UR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE PERFORMED WEN DEPTH CH SEDP@IT Is WDWN 6'OF GRAM b CATCH BASIN CRAZE Y BIRMNW s SURFACE COURSE _ - - %ff MIAMIO E 7 g O BURY FABRIC 6'MIN. IN GROUND. " X - - 2'SIEUYWOUS BINDER NURSE J v, DO NOT PUT SPWL ON NETLAND - 3 - B• BIDE OF PENCE SILT SAM - -1R74 PRECAST RING 9ECTW NOTES - EATON SILT SAC( - - YARN DKNING FOR BASIN 15 COMPACTED WA14L BAS COURSE SANITARY EWER PPE ND LIMIT OF 1.SILT FENCE m N INSTALLED GRAT - _ . YWRK m PREVENT OFFSITE MIGRATION OF CEMCAS CONCRETE OR _ SEDIMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION. - _ � PRECAST SECIIWPL PLATE - n . ANSIW 1'REBAA FOR 1111=1111-1111=1111-1 EMP W BAG REND •. RESTRaNT L �— - SILT FENCE NUPacTm SUBGRADE (NOT TO SCAE) _ PLAN _ (REMOVE CUNT IWDT PILL 1. WiLET DIVERT Po A YINMUN 0.10'LONER SECPON MATEWAL AND REFUGE .WM 0%COMPACTED ELL) PIAN WILT WVFRT. SILT SACK SEDIMENT TRAP I P TK CONNECTIONS TO MANHgE SNAIL BE MADE YAM A WATER-TGHT BOOT - - - - - (xor m scaE) .TYPICAL PAVEMENT.SECTION(NGT TO SCAT£) OLE- TYPICAL SEWER MANHOLE - - e . - (NOT TOSCALE) R z (ENI 'g F}PPNS ((ENT VAUNT REOb) � 1p_O� 1PUINENT 9 I Li LiS S g 3 c VERTCAL GRANITE CURB VARIES TAN NAT - 24'0 Q.W Y CEMENT 0.WPo¢TEBIT.CONCRETE PAOMEM- (B'Rita W - .� m OBZCT UR' - 12* TOP COURSE(I r 191.) 1ELUWUA AREAS) 9 CURB W.W.MESH CWCRER ('PI m—m - SHPT VARIES»sum" EXPANsfdl.X%xr EAmuc SURFACE I 1 I H bj b «Lsz(unx> =111=IIII '° FPIRI t.ox(mu) gg PAYEMEHT 1111 II IIII - IIII 11 £AMUT DUSTIN BT. PAVEMENT AMD TACH MATEDGE =III = CEMENT CONCLSEE - a CFMETT CONCRETE _ (]DOD PSI-TYPE 1) (J000 PS-TYPE 1) B'CDMPACTED GRAY4 COMPACTED SVAV4 - _ PLAN NEW B' 6' IYf BASE MIN. CCMPAC1m 91BMAM 2Y RMv Fmleh 2A'Rker NOTES. - - -T M PVC f. PRIME EXPANSOM.NINES AT NM,N RT.O.C.WTI - .. PRE-MWmm JSNT m A. - - (MI lnlvl) gra' a z PROMDE CONLRW.Nwrs AT 6•D.C. - VERTICAL GRANITE CURB a PROTIDE RIIDW KNISH IN DIRECTION PFAPENOMULAR TO CUB. 71n 4. CEMENT CONCRETE SIW1 SE 4.000 PS-TYPE It (NOT TO SCALE) fib P0.CONCRETE SIDEWALK - - • (mR u) (NOT To SCALE) - - _ _ MetNEATMET VARES - Ta k�ACTED Wd E WT® - WN.1 Tee';CU COAs - I _ 6li.C[PoNEIE PAY}yplT -GR WURSE(1('WN.) Tee - n' - I. 40FE VARIES» HA2SHEAµSEAL'P12'EACH AWBOTWRAIN ,'.)IIImI1ND¢NAT _ - S TION W WCrvM��mnad1I- T1C!NNPACDD91B4AAOE O1' 12' TDEENUREPERNEIEA CMWT NNCAETE 1. CONI 5,OM PS MIN AFTER 28 DAKN'%R'W WL SIXA:TS YAIGHTSHALL BE NRI AT 6' (IOm PSI-tYPE 1) - 2 AND GAWLL LNFlWM LRH 24B DMR:BOAPU DR SANDE PFUCAmS DF POF S&E4.000 PS M0.' WMPRESSYE - ENDS OF ALL Nita NAPACIED(.RAVEL BASE REcuuTONi URS FlIFL CAS M0 PWMBINC COOT AND APPUCADIE tltt OF SAEY MIEN N0.M-MISOOC 22.840/ 0S-DIA.DO RECEIV4 1 F SUOMI CIXLCRLTE 8'RUO( W DIA.TOx111 3. ALL IETNFOR(EMENT PER ASM C122T. M-YISACZC 21,)Bl1 U JIPACRD 4. DESQMII FOR H-21 LOADING 0 SIBWADE 5. 92E TO BE CONFIRMED BY MECHANICAL ENMNEET a COMMERCIAL UNE GREASE TRAP (1.500 GA ION MONO ITHIC) g PRECAST CONCRETE RB SET IN NEW PAVEMENT (NOT m SCALE) CONCRETE DUMPSTER PAD - - O ME MMN-CAMBiUV GROUP.INC 2016 (NOT m SCALE) (NOP TO SCALE) - U < PRO&/3359 - - - DETECTIBLE WARMING PAD T C - DETECTABLE 6 THICK CONCRETE SEE WHEELCHAIR RWI✓DEO PLASTIC CAP t WARNING PPD DRIVEWAYMON MUCH ACCESS RAMP DETAILOf r"I A p ° CONCRETE Nu llyyy r ! SIDEWALK ../ S� 1_ 6•SRR WE HUD WITH 4O '�-Ij" S� DETECTABLE SEE y 'f a CONCRETE ANO PAINTED YI�Iu sd� WIANING NOTE 9 h CAMION YELLOW WN191 GRADE 9MFAfE l^O I y a F TREATMENT VARES F LWW'1� - -i.5&'- e1S u 4 ItOk W-6•_(MIN.) T-6 T 6 . _ _ VARIES - 6'-B•(WNJ EDGE OF ROADWAY 2'OA CONCRETE SUPPORTLOW SIDE TRANSITION A NOU ODE TRANSTW - +P )I is. NOTESL - - - - - ILII I CWPACED(RAVEL1. THE MAMWIY ALLOWABLE 9DEWAUK AND CURB RAMP CROSS WES SHALL RE 15&0%MI )2 TR MAMNUM ALLOWABLE SLOE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCLUDING CURB RAWS SHALLBE 5&S TRE MAMMUM ALLOWABLE ROPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROOM CURB RAMPS SHALLBE 7.= - - I 4. A MINIMUM OF J FEET CLEAR SHALL BE MARTANW AT ANY PERMANENT OBSTACLE IN ACCESSIBLE ROUIE.DUL,HYDRANTS, ILII- UTBNTY POES,TREE WELLS,SOUS ENC.) S CUNB TNCATENT VIRES SEE PIANS FOR CURB TYPE _ S BASE ID RAMP SHALL RE TRADED TO PREVENT PORRDING'. - ]. SEE TYPICAL SOM"SECNON UP RMfl CONSIRUCIIW. - - - B MERE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE LESS THAN 5 IN WIDTH(E CWDWG CURBING)A 5'X 5 PASSING AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED -AT NTERVAIS NOT TO EXCEED 200.FEET. NOTIM - - - G����C� 6 9. EUMNATE ALL CUNNING AT RAP(DINER THAN VERTICAL WRONG,WHICH%AU-BE SET FWSH)WHERE IT ABUIS ROADWAY. t OS&TOLERANCE FmCOOTRUCBON - BOLLARD Ni d e ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (ACR) TYPE'S' DRIVEWAY APRON/ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYPE 'A') _ - (NOT TO SCALE) ' @ (NOT TO SCALE). - (NOT TD SCALER .. _ 2C MIN. 56 MAR S c FJ $ - � WALE BORDEN '^ - - - - BWE BACKGROUND P Mm SIRE(Tri.) TT 12d(TW:.UNLESS MOTOR OTHERWISE) I s wFF "DOIE Frey ' S 1e•(Tri.> ::. .. NOTE: ,p I. THE STROKE WIDTH OF THE PANTED SYMBQ AND THE WHILE BORDEN WET `(n4 NOTE:_ DE A CCNU M THICKNESS 6 T,MEN A MAMMUM TIICONESS OF 4'. yZ?I 1 1. PARALLEL SPACES 9100.BE 8'v22'. 2 BLUE BACKGROUND AND MIT BORDER ARE OPIIWAL ¢" PARKING SPACE STRIPING INTERNATIONAL ACCESSIBILITY PARKING SPACE SYMBOL ISMINGAPAD - (NOT fi SCALE) - (NOT TD SCALE) 3 a SEE NOTE 9 1/C UP IMAX) pIW,WIR g n r J (GALVANGEO) _ e WHITE STRIPING Y 5' D.C.AT 45IN LOADING G a AREA(Tref Z :N o Y _ SDCWH RAN P d NOTES' W =® _ O nag I 9k 1. THE MAWMNM ALLOWABLE 9DEWAUK AND CURB RAMP CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE 1.5&(1S LIN.). ' f 1�• g§ y 2 THE MAAMUM ALLOWABLE WE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCEEDING CURB RA SHALL BE 5& POST SECTOR g$� N ��. M S THE MAAMUM ALLOWABLE.SAFE O'AC ESSIBLE RWTE CURB RAMPS%ALL BE T.5& - NTS O oTv� Q w o 4. -A MINMUM Of J FEET CLEAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ANY PFRMMRM OBSTACLE IN ACCESSIBLE ROUE Y K.HYDRANTS UTILITY POLES TREE WELLS 9GH5.ETC.) SIOEVWALX - a N 5 OMB TREATMENT VARES SEE PLANS FOR CURB ME. - SOI NAT WAIL STANDARD a �< 6. BASE OF RAMP SHALL BE GRADED TO PREVENT PONOING - ON l ACCES9BWtt S1N80. 2. SIE,TYPICLL SIDEWALK SECTOR FOR RAMP CONSTRUCTION. - GRADE PAINTED OV PAVEMENT B. WORE ACOLBOR E ROUTES ARE LESS THAN.5'IN MTH(EXCLUDING CLOSING)A 5'•5'PASSING AREA. - NUT AAD M 9100.BE PROVIDED AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 2W REEL ELMINATE ALL WRONG AT RAMP(OTHER LOCKWASRfl M EXPO VFRTCAL SEE SIGN - VAN 4'WHIR 9. WRBLNG,MUCH SXALL SE SET iLUSH)1W4RE IT ABUTS ROADWAY. - OEEA1s /16'NACUIXE ACCEEE)EL.E SW SIHIPE IIP. Ia.ALL CURB MPS STALL WART WTI 521:CMR MASSAWUSETS MCN TECNRE ACCESS BORN AND SCREW OR BOUT - MERICAS OISPBI(TIES ACT REGULATIONS VAN ACCESSIBLE WHEEL STOP 1B'-0'(TVP.) O_ SPACES ONLY POST - MOUNTING PARHAL ELEVATION IL) ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (ACR) TYPE 'A' - KILL F5¢ p (NOT TO SCALE) I. PAMMENT MAX SIDE A IN ALL DIRECTORS Tn lA.l ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE O 0 TE uOWN-CAIERWN GROUP.INC 2016 (NOT TO SCALE) (NUT 10 SCAM 0 e PROD.VMS ALL ORNNMANHgE 00VER5 SHALL OWR BE C &FRAME ASSEMBLY: MM TO CONFORM WTI FITCH OF UK ECUIVA TO EJW ROADWAY AND FLUSH WT1 ROAD SURFACE YODEL N0.W418MOOD-2 CLAYCOURSES um) RD AmUmEO(AME W1 (MAs PEWWED) - PflOPOffO f1NLS1 CRPDE ECFV-31S0Z COVER b fRNdE M EJW Y: USE EWIVALEM m EJW - ALL ALLEN MANHMCONN RM WRB BLEL BE bODF1 N0.W41a/NaO0.2 ROADWAY YAtA TO CONFORM MATH PITCH OF COMA 4 ilUlE ASSEMBLY Ay sk s PRECAST A.AT TOP$ m OR COME SECTOR - POMWAY A PRECAST FROM •��RING SECTOR TO MHWED GRADEMLTIARW STEPS i2'aC 95 E �TO GAY BRIq(CWRSESPRECAST MT TOPPRECAST MCREIE R' _Ync'RECT.NOTCHPRB SEO FlNW WME (AB REWIRED) ry �MANZ SHNl 6' -CONFORM TO AS1M . O -289 //Wjj12bIAINfILiRAFTW 9 BUFIE SPEC.NO.a 4 O 82A C 'm�IX CONE SECTW p HOODED PREGSf PWG ffCTW r 1 - AGALEASCOTLLT12'MS 8PREGASL PoNCRING SECTW Itil N-12 IHI£TSENOR"THS 12'aGriV'll iIN OPAPA PIPE WNL PRECAST CWGIETE MMHGE 9' MW+ I2'MS N-12 Y : �—SHALL CERAM TO ASTM PLAN IP7 AD DWI-1 - - b a' EPEE.N0.C 4ft-BG aclONON WRI CPENMC FOR GRAIN m 0 8'CWPACIED IXI15W➢ S W BAff - SECTICN A-A'• _ MG MO PRECMi 4LT a MG OPENING R �� E . - AN SDE IX BNFE WALL 1� 12TNA 121NA $ . INV-21.b - FOR CRNN PIPE 3 - CONTROL S OCS 1 (OUTLET ADSL TRUCTl1RE (1)1 (FOOT mSCALE) - m STREEBBAK QNSHFO 8'EE IPMIED CN191E0 - IC ALA AMISH CAME BIOME EASE IS' PAVEMENT(f465H GRID d 1'RUBBER NFWBWNE. fl%14 GAt1FY NOTE: n I. ECCENIIWC CONE MOTOR MAY BEBRSTmIED TOF - 1 a a `a Ji TRAGAL DRAIN MANHOLE - _ TYPICAL CATCH BASIN > } m •'{ I f' - (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT m SONE) Ya m h; _ 5OF SMF- 17.W 10 6 (MIN)P-I 6 n WASHED GUSHED ESHWI STONE CEOTEXT E FABRIC - DETAIL $EC11DN METING FREE Q = W WRAPPING(TVP) - DRAMG SSL - - :FIT _ 49055 CLUNKY UNDER PAHMFNi COMPACTED - ROADWAYS FEW ROOF A LDNI k SFD ROADWAY 9AHffACE STEEL £M RS POOR, PAVEMENT SECTOR r -� POST _ a .'•..p SF£OETPA I - J UNIT 6 CRUSH E I WASHED STONE STRUCTURAL BAWL--COMPACTED n (BOTTOM AND SIDES) m 95%IN It MAX LITS(SPE M) Y PRECAST-/I I - Sin a -SAND CUSMW(ME Al) Z lyl J CONMETE GAUZY - PIPE ?^N J SIDE MEW "raj-�--- 9'MIN.(EACH BOE]. _�,ry_ NOTES, - I - - BMwNG �- GNMUUA FDL PA G 1/2'AND C) Q 1. CORI 5,000 PB MINIMUM AfTER 20 DAM WmSCA ED - M IiWWEO RETMNEB W Na 4 SIEVE(TAPE A2) F� R^ -2. OEBR.riED FOR AASHTO 11-2O LOM,0 m EFT COWR IMWECTW PWT MG (SE NOTE) Z .Vl 1 ENO k 507E UNITS W NOT HAW FLOW-THRU G GS (MANHOLE W� 1 Q�A o3 a FRAME MO COVER __ 6' d n ff TO KNISH GRADE) T 1r g'd 4-0- (Tro.CF z) � � � 0' _ — W EARTH _ '�fT� SAE� CONMETE PIAN. ILII � ? - _ 9JPPoRT Uff TYPE SI"ML FUR W Lmff A+ REMOVE AND REPLACE OF - a w UNWTABIE MATMJJR Ia I III III 3'MIN OR D+2'W WENFR 6 GREATER 1111 =1111-1111= 1111 fS NOTE USE SAND BEOgNC FOR WATER AND FlPE ffRWCE M INSTNLAnW. NrT FOR SIGNS SLED WALL FOR - INLANDSCAPEAREAS 0 PERIMETER OF TIED - F= TYPICAL DETAIL - SIGN POST - UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL Z Lal PRECAST CONCRETE INOLTRATION GAMEY - MOT m WAZ) O THE MORN-CAMERON GROUP. 3010.W (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT m SCPlE) U a PROM/3359 Plant Schedule . Qty Key Botanicaf Nama Common Name Size - ' - s °_ � - TREES o •wrm IR UI flans Me,F a Valle ForgeP Main Elm 35-0•wl 'a 6 nsarwmrarrmnrmra:e . . G'I® Hbbe Pawml Gale Mwnn GM MaMenbaU Treel>ewla a Hareage Hemaea elmb 12-u�_ -oaa, , NN,^ Gletllkla ha.1h.Bk W ha,.N wat 33.5•ral Paoaa Pmr: hum Real Samek Real Su:lael Maple.® Ouemus mba Ratl Oak 3Waal �Gue:wSwmneeSmll Oak 3J5•celANTIN s aJ cseu Judein mra a Rlue Palm elunpSmeal Pepeelpei er 1&24- 25 e z6 CO Cut..,aamm Tm f L. vftwlcat aeaaRr 162A• - §§ IVS'G9 aNN.SI�M3Tea P.VL �+� o 47 COMP TWOlOnp taanna Emmem 18-24• - pw Q Q r6n.eaem/41.JaIla55vmtH J1 f 0o e O - 12 EG Tax ar.NBnlele5 a E,Ifnh Green Nba�Nee' 18 �po Off' 16 EY Tazuabswebre—L. En II&ISpree. Y. 1924' I _ V 33 GLS Rhue 8ra:natMa G:atwv Heccal Sumac 1&24' 1HCJ texcreue MMmala Hep Cdumaf He¢Columne J 5b' m• MO i M e 6 H AaxcrenalB Hefle:Y H41e:e J8peneceHl 18-24' •y}°''�y \ IC•� hf � EEa- 161G - Mz Iabre Sminock 61amMC Nkbary 225 mNk ryVR-RwMI-Y IBJVE EMbTIM6 iRAOC 5 MIL MlaoLtlolB aleaissaw $beaen Ca IC 18-24' - WL a• O/ AIIITGO OGT �A� %^''�i U i MIN a••AV.YAt 15 PAV iThuja arlaenlalla PaMdWW P,aMaalA wfte S.T ® t oT _ ( 5` 1 eLM/,/JC/]//Cf• 13 RTD Comma2a EleGaMsslrte Veagale]Real TMpwa 24 /\® - �/���'pk�I//'• Ll W/CAP (Not fo sco/e) a•&P®CID 6WKWlA1 3 W T..mall.UWtlLS'a185t Doul Upd ht Y. 49 t 'p 1 HANDRA L PPGM TOP H.YP Lf a RBA E .(Not to stole) f RM,d419na vlaes LY ON am51ME aol- 10AND Malta ayllbYa Bce Roa.., y).'' 0,•j�,� "96 FG Pennisewmelopecuabtlea Founleln Gress. - tpel T PAN Paft I., Swfl tah G. 1 el - 4'fENI£ E,.iENCE 10 Vgt Ne eN as Va:legeteal ao I'd - DW vkNswMM role-aa romxaMOlaVL .se}bve sites etre Nmvaea _ % PM,TO REMRIN B'M rvlx slam y1m IRM TOP 4 eN.T!m wM.9Aµ1 3 2 V WHPSTER PM AND wo ewa lusx A+aava ON rw1 3 zs TNM ENIx09ME A"._i 3.RTp FPl]WCK IPJVSM' / . - r\ Bpi J2a a e slleET / 9-FA POOP.RNNCMLeI ' R z TREE PLANTING / a-PA ���D IDPEA9TC E �E DE AR> & g U 5G ALE: I/2 =1 .�:,� 5-el LA ENLARGEMENT PN _ ' ^T^"`ad / / .. .. 1 ,. ease R SCP1L 1 7 ._ o evYaulna,l / 00 5 10 w10 i n ayfne Fse vee:m W -4 of 5 WGH SCRERONGAND \ �� PI�PNNM BBURw + 9 uj � - P 3.46 B� 9 t,}a U.45 J' BEATMG e^'rear.Me alp m Im J I G r®a.ae mar acpe . PLNL4IER RET. ' GIN TC 31.42 30 99 1EPB - ®�«�•T� fqM a I / 5 IL _ )�// li ID31 a W i ellg➢INc 9 < Flf6T 0.008 ELEY.•395m ^•$PWS IYW-Paca _ _,.� NLT PAY1421RADER FI -^""""a I I 3 K' J Z I _ I: DI No M (Al I,MMN n J .f PA BV r II NI 31m W (..7�r�'Fr's TC:31.95 w .�lxnx a3I j yr r F 31 60 �; aR uNn PAVER SffAmER �aas,� P.•..o ewes, 9 � � o �i yr yr HL N�o E g Z g w " < n � LLo7�aP 9y.�BgS�p I ' A og. 1. r_ 81WIGp SOIL.Wff4- II - - _ m'"v moV all. m 1 aMp-asR — ems. G_ 1GC _CO _ � WES T A V E N UE 2X P.T TRIM,PIIJ ufa ,!._ k�.:.rr w'.ry'1,^nfl.i.rn'•,51r. li:^' ®. c°0ear�'�re m�ar:e iva^ 5/4>Gb P.T TRIM,5TANM M :.1: . L- — _ ans�'rnar.`ae rrlsa.Plea caoaTmmw 15/dll9l nf 7A5HBVCL05UHE •>.r. .PT SLAT5 CM 2X6 P .V0T.PRAMIH0 M U (Not to scale) q OR 6 __ •�,. __ PLAN ,>,> ��eYee lY�-FiL 5EE PLAN GIDE Lames k<emmanuellassodates Q SC 1, '•'��d'•a°�'d'• •a^a°,a„Y .Nps ..a .ata ,a ,: WEST AVE. , mwwammumw5 Cn zd 0 10 20 W sao eAae FENCE P05T N 1 O d W Bi GQ-T4BT z nPLAN7ING AT SIAUC7UHAL SO/L SCREEN/l1/G FENCE we��.� 6dm0 9 Z wwfa:mnameaDim 0 THE MMN-CAMERON BWP.INC.W15 - L l (Not to sco/e) (Not t0 scale) S� PRGL/1159 Gminaim schedule . 5 O1 Oty LaEel Ai[ange.D-t total Lweene LLF Ce c[1 [ion A. "a SINGLB N.A. 0.300 1 AAL ALN440-Y532LE0-3K-1500 LOMEXS ETO/ f¢AA36O-XX 6 N91 SINGLE N.A. 0.130 AAL ALN490-Y9 32LEG-3K-3000 LNJIENX ETM/ aES360-K%' 6 P9 SINGLE N A 0.880 AAL MINN-32I.e0-30.-]00 XE9/PR4-90.10-125-10-EL/TPA50 BL - 1 P40 BACK-BACK N.A. 0.880 AAL (2) ALN445 Y4-33LEN-3K-]00 X55/PR9-4N0-125-30-BL/12 'fPA50-SL - 99.�yJ 4!11 P3 INGLB N. 0.880 AAL ALN945-Y3 32LE0-3K-]00 X55/PR4-9810-125 10-BL/TN30-BL OIV, A, A U a: Z§b, 9K{�/�My falCulacicu Smuma 4�/ LeLel Ca1CTI Ua1Ca I I Max Iin I P/Mn Nex/Mal, SI[e P18ae Site Plane ill�winance Pc 0.80 3.4 03 12,uu I 39.00a B 111 Plane elena[ Zlluminance. Pc 0.11 O.B 0.0 N.A. N.A. n - e[kin ..ly 14.4. 1 13.00 D. °dam FIS9EWLN EMIAVYMY ° °•0 S., ° VFAYtTE daaE q. • N] S a.3 ° .° D.D 3° I _� °0.0 - A. .a g e 0.9 I °1 0.1 0. 5 0.0' 990f 1.0 .. O.I 1• 0 3s .9 5 ! °.9 0.6 ° l.a I.5 3. .. .I 0.9 °° a °5 °as a °' O.z 6 B 9 !.0 0. AN S ac 0.9.a. 3 °.3 n ) 3 ° P a, 09 !s 1 o.o 9nsr. 8 o 1.3 4D a z.o os ° 0,6. 1. 3.3 ISI Q 0.3 WSL ° • 3.z ' 0.9 ! E.o v Gs 9 3 j4aW �. 0.3 °. 0 wsL .. .o - 1- a wL 3 OS T 8 EL s Ll a �a L ' �N 0.00 WW o I 0 °2 I°2 SIgtT ee Y ws Z a qCL 0 3os 1 0 wsl _ 5 1.19) °> as 0 ° o.o' o. uw sn�Ps F Q � M °.3• L' ' o sme FAxX M 1 o.i LIe 5 �SL -°.i EA IM 0,7 I 1) %° 3 ]Olf .3.K - 45 "0 a .5 °.9 • (PUBLIC-40'MM jams k.smanual I L m 9 ec F _ - RI Mw C �Hn 01.6C=7 Q al 981)&M-7487 �J o � W gel) Bzwn3 d 0 10. 20 40 veamm.mm 4�.L " aaaa.�.xmwud.m0 a TIE MtltlN-CAMON f ,MC.2016 PiOA 13359 931-91 tu 1 � _-- --- ❑ - - -- -- -- - - , - ILII VIII - - _ _ .. I I I sP � - - tj - - - - - =- - - - - - - - - LL -1/JAN., EL4 e•-e•o ELEV. I I I , 1111111111 {5/5/16 N $k FITI WAFPOLE�T' - - -- - - - - - - - - - ARCNITECT5 LLC 32 CHURCH ST. 93-6, 1 SALEM, MA 01SIO 978 -144 8982 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR 5,151 SO.FT. - SECOND FLOOR 5)Si S2 FT. THIRD FLOOR 1,944 SCE.FT. - TOTAL 24,355 SQ.FT. A PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN A-I SCALE: 1/8" P-m" - - - - - - - - LA LH Lx 5/5/16 - - - F ( Tl„fAN Ivo UJARDL 1 ARCHITECTS LLC - - - - - - - - 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA (0191(4 918 -144 - 8982 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE . FLOOR 8257 50.Ff, 5EC SEGOND FLOOR 5,287 50.FT. THIRD FLOOR 7.944 SQ.FT.PR4 - 2 A OPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN TOTAL 2a�HH5a.FT- IF- LU JIIL-ILLI-j I I I All] CJS d - -- - - - -- - � - --- 'MEN`,' - - - < - - P P P JI A�FII //I��TMAI � I ARCHITECTS LLC - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA Ol9l0 - e -144 - 8982 PROPOSED.SQUARE FOOTAGE. FIRST FLOOR $IST SR FT. SECOND FLOOR 8,187 50.FT. THIRD FLOOR .1,944 SO.FT. PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR PLAN TOTAL 2438850.FT. LLI LLI lu LL ECL ElEvdTIW - RL'a wa-rAai " THEA RGVT2 ELEVdTW �yO � " rtOP a&IB-0.oOR) I BECITID RCCR ELEVATIG ' (iCP a wBAPJW . I ' I IFII I TM AN CAS PROPOSED LAFAYETTE ST ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC = . i/8" = 1'-�" " - 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA OISIO SIO -144 - 8982 A .4 _ iT l.®R[Y'R ELEVdTIW mr.10 LH 5EC RQ ELEVdTIR RG4 � II IFII I I �AIV n PROPOSED WEST 'AVE ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC SCALE: I/8" _. I'_mll 32 CHIJRC�4 ST. SALEM, MA 01910 918 -144 - 8982 CJS llJl_ll 1hlJl ELEVaiIGN I I . LIL IMIRD Roos eLevaraH —J4 - SECgm FLOLR ELEV<TKM (TOS 6&ID-RCW31 - F I TMAN 4 C1 OPOSED SIDE ELEVATION WARIDLE� a-6 574 LE: 1/ . _ ,_m, ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CHURCH ST. SALEM, MA OISIO 918 -144 - 8982 IF- to t-H Ill LIL pT4 ELEVAtION � - �oP w we-ROtF) '� ee ee ee ee // ii im 8 i/ ee ee TNI.®I ELEVATIRT ?OP C4 wB-RLV'Rl � I I F. ' bECONp RODR ELEVATION ' ' ROP OF wB-FLGGRI " 5/5/16 � " - '' IFII I TMAI � W " ARFDLENI� a PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CHURCH 5T. SALEM, MA OISI a 915 --144 - 8982 1 _ 1331 LAFAYETTE STREET �ym O W . s 1 MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING 331-335 LAFAYETTE STREET, 5-7 & 11 WEST AVENUE 1 (ASSESSOR'S MAP 52, LOTS 231, 232, 233 AND.234) SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Y _ ° 1i w � e d $ 1 \\ g 3 4 Aj old,mo a „.� BUIIDBv'G 1 lllllll/lll/1/lllN D N WEST-yp¢q:wwmq'AVENUE .. - LAFAYETTE STREET ELEVATION . e PLAN scat Ve•=r 1 EcaE r-�rc a 0 . z� X 1 APPLICANT: CIVIL ENGINEER: SCHEDULE OF PLAN SET DRAWINGS: g ^ ROBERT BURR THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, INC. - 0'.M C/C 331 LAFAYETTE, LCC 447 BOSTON STREET, US ROUTE 1 C-1 'COVER SHEET N 12�66 1 - 75.NANEPASHEMET STREET "TOPSFIELD, MA 01983 C-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN Z < o g< MARBLEHEAD; MA 01945 PHONE: 978-887-8586 .0-3 SITE LAYOUT PLAN a C-4 GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN SALEM SURVEYOR: D-1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS I N BUILDING ARCHITECT: Dci SURVEY GROUP-NORTH sr1oRE D-2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS II N a 1 _ n •� _ PITMAN &.WARDLEY ARCHITECTS 18 CENTER STREET, SUITE 1 -D-3 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS III PBP�sT eE min P ' 32CHURCHSTREET NEWBURYPORT, MA 01950 L-1 -PLANTING PLAN Y SALEM, MA 01970 - 978-465-9992 PHONE: 978-744-8982 SL-1 - SITE LIGHTING PLAN - 1 _ . LOCUS � 'b�,� '��23 A-1 FIRST FLOOR.PLAN M A-2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: A-3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN JAMES K. EMMANUEL ASSOCIATES A-4 LAFAYETTE STREET ELEVATION w 1 ap9 22 CARLTON ROAD A-5 WEST AVENUE ELEVATION sEAM s i MARBLEHEAD,.MA 01.945 A-6 SIDE ELEVATION (n c°uE PHONE: 781-622.-7487 A-7 REAR ELEVATION � .LOCUS MAPNTS. - - U 1 O INE YCftM-CNIFRCN OMP.MC W 6 o ma.µus 1 SALEM BITUMINOUS LEER „4 .BBITUMINOUSW .FOREst PVdUE CC tTF.R'FOREST 0ONc -CON(AEIE LOCUS pSIW A 5 'g W Mal HM Ere m OF PAPAvmdr / LOOUS gy '..R" RW RW �w TdPi EOWE 1 - TO TOP CURBNG /i 6 piive'WLIFCY SP�i r ` IL Pfi E£E VGC VERIIGAL GRANITE CURB g - 1 C UCHr NN y C 46 ON a]m3 ® ROWS MP➢ N.T.S N �. WEpw ,Ep@ " o Gl51QIFA(CM) fe'm x16 Flan�AtEIE�M / cWOQIE o •. '-, - - y�I, (9 6 IBJJO/9J PID 29 c - C"O '. W f. ®- C0.8 GATE CG) evx,.ne,vu[eo 1nANSFsatud � • � 36 Os sEMR u,wxnt(SAN) RECORD OWNERS: n 1 /a / _ / N • LEL FAMILY ENTERPRISES MAIN NANHRE(DW) of O A -` .,• f I /fEw'dub lumiac WI IAGAIETTE STREET HYDRANT /d7/O / \ 30� a Iq I . ( DELT BOON 111062 PAGE 485 y e 1 UTUTY FOIE 8/ '^ A �'� .Te m.mw f�j 1I N�.a wl 11%ESTSA ANUEG=AN PRINCE fii 3 ." U JTY F,XE MTH UpR / / / o� Ni�4 \pwlmrc for ,� .Jne" AI-W��-. 1 i� I Q' $ OEF0 0(Mf 9 PAM 11J Nm 1 # ❑di POE ILP) / W / /) 3 I f .St] 331 tJX /H g ( X30— ~ I-I 15-)Mai ANNUE ON MET&POST - /' I N 3 W^I'p'M-- I T I ( DFID BOp(344]8 PACE BI RE ® AW & / / /.! I� R4r v� 4 cAs axw ww. Wi�9 '� II ® IN 1 "REFERENCES: u,UmX / 20.41 JAS B''� ���I 1 ESSEX WINTY REGISTRY OF MODS r o •m'm AOT LRAOE " / I F _ w JoaJ • WED SON 24030 PAM 40 �bQ g ) N/RJlwmnl�L ! 1 DEN 8001(ISM2 PACE 185 S y / o yyLL \`M�A'9AaS 1 S F®SOM 13388 PACE IN 1 w WATER ME / / / ]�` )J V oy/ \ I I `� ,)0.WJ7±Anka I ® ftAN BOBI(mB PUN 14) a s SEMfR UIQ ^ Y P31 `.%. Pm 76 RAN BDox 9BWX 51 PLW 113 Y o/ p p S x/F 1a-v® a�umfca `Ja.4 3— IAe _ l PLAN 226 OG 1972 g IU a —ELECTRIC UNE S }l1 tAEA�raifE BRUT nlRDrnE.S ST PLAN BOW 3110 RAR 93 i yyy /z �lr r TOERIWE ME / " S� N S• x/W WO b SS \ / / + i' 2JSat Sq.Feet MNoxG � 0.5401 Ame s1s1a>E ors was xS EOP umsiv GnS CAS UNE 11 x xT.3®u'xax'Pc.L]¢amiAE /aavrtmva �/mImPmAN�TEe E3W I u.5'] ARi[w�[Jn�o sRvs 13 DiERKAD WRES WDCMFENDE 'Fd ( s _-_ _ ASffSSONSP/LOT P P35 xBS]5/rfi E - - DnfwAsa � E 3 /�' : �� �t1' �1.x•Aarrz smFn / 1 �.B'� �I .me I H o E 1ft 5, a yp1 Y fa, A34 � 5.%Sx$p Gw1 I 2 I STORY a6x s 9 � 1 0.135x A.Grta - � @ xOOU FRAME I HEREBY CIXIIFT THAT ME BIIILOW(S ARE LOOAIN As SHORN ANO VAT TNs 0.1131 A. PVN ISAT THE WAN ONE SURREY. Y. SUflYLY AND PRESENTS THE FACTS A5 R " - � 2-FPl11LY Rxf-ee.Y � Il5 /IJ FOUNDSAT 1Nf 11NF Ci 1HE.9RYEY." � /r� x?L LTR JJI ARTE GIC /.�' I � /JNgn-jel •- 32-. . D waxswm H LiLlI OR I/ J Nw1IDNE PAVER mas IJS] N FMVNp - J Dlz on I Jia y t-. � 'a. � J al.m• __ _ e^A Jsuv-___ 4am . � av 4iN � &i�CENIC..— - 3'-- -J1- 'w'�wpA� yZA le.muf— RA' VLL I� `� lb -.—w —w—W- w' 0 0 0%- —o—o-er� —q-o— a D oo 0 0-0-0-0-0— - STZollo F s �sS µ{= w PY w N— —w �M1�pW�—w w—w—w p ,, w w PRDFFSSpiAL VND SDR`2ttXR DATE (NI) Y• C w.I! WIR_3 N ! NS ry:�5-5 fi Ste. w5— S—Sa 54Tw5 —Sw DEGAS _♦ CA- —M �W COP P, f � 33--- e J a w.-aa fe'm-xze O Q c 3� PUN NOTES: d � I. TIE USING 0OND1TIONs INFORMATION SROM!HEREON FOR 331-335 IAFAYETIE STREET AND 5,7 Y 11 M3T ANMh WAS 99TNNEo MOM AM&FIDD SU MYS PERFgMN BY MGT SURYET F {J . GROUP-NORM SHORE W JUNE 1 6 22115 ARID JANUARY 14.2016. 2 p AIIONS BASED DN NAN W AS 6FA4EISKD BY WS CBSERVAIIdi - aw ]. MR PS A B PMPANN FOR OUR AD 5 NOT B FCR ME SRMED PON AS 6 OBTAINING PERW15 AND LOCAL OTHER USE AND 5 NOT ID BE USEM O RdN UPON AS A WNSIRUCTW J a 1 - MWN-Ni ER NHT OTNER UY By OTHERS MMWi ME W6TIEN Cp14NT C£ME . YpdN-CNIFfIW p2gR; . " 4. ZONING 051MCT 60U08)ARIES WIIPILED iR01 GIIT OF SYEY ZONING NM DA1N AUQISF NN6. FF�� . S ABUTTER WORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE CITY W SALEM ASSESSORS AND GIS M 1 6. All UNDERGROUND UTWIES MOM ARE AFPINNUATE ONLY AND ARE BASED ON LOCAIIONS OF " ODEPPAARR1MENT.amu�aw5 RECORDS ED a ME(TTY �ENL�INc DGT SURVEY GROUP-NORTH SHORE v) ROOD CERTIFlCAl10N. - IXCAVANYG BLlSTNG,INSTAWNG BUPAMFNC,GRADING.BN PAVEMENTRESTORATION.THOSE N C)ON G ce A DMSION OF OIGRAL GEOGRAPHIC IECHNOLOGlE6, INC. U Z 1 FLAN BY EERTY IJEW Of N A OUMENRT EP%MAME fEYA 8000 MAP THIS Of,U MESNOT Sli ALL UTITS COYPSEES RAPT BE 70.ACT OF 1911 ASSA IN ITS Z O Z N W U1WIIf5 NOT SHOVM W 11f5 PLVI.SEE CHAPTER 310,ACAs CE 196J,YASSAdUSETIi SCARE 1'=M ME O.n UES MTRN A ZONE%(AREAS AS MOM TO RE RMOOUTSICALL-DIG SASE-AT i-BBB-JH-M33.THE Ypm{AYFRON GROUP ASMMES NO 18 CENTER SPHEET TEL 978-465-9992 cn F J ME 0.25 ANNUAL GRANGE RIND RAW)AS SHDVM W THE ROOD d U INSURANCE RAZE NAP,CgINUNItt PANEL N0.2`ACSCOU9C Mlld RFSPCH981Utt FOq DAMAGES WpIPo2N AS A EERILY LF DTUIIES CMITIEO OR MAQ'}IMIELY SURE 1' nTOOtlgtaurvry com X Z s 0 i' 'O m 40 'Mm.BEFORE NILRE WNNECTWS THE APPROPRIATE UNITY MONEERORG DEPARTMENTS www.dg�umry.com MNiS AIID NFE[TY£DAR DE JULY 18 2014. MUST BE CONSULTED. - NEW9URYPORT, AIA ww.dgx umry com W O 01950 U . 1 0 THE MORN-CAMFRW GROUP,INC.M16 FROI iJb9 1 PARKING iaBL>- 0E REMRIM RESIDFNNAL ONE RESDENIIAL TWO RUSNESS 331-315 fAFAYENE 5-7 WEST AVENUE 11 WEST AVENUE _ CdABINEO LOTS 1 SPAR PER I MOSS RttA FAMILY(M) FAMILY(R21 NEIGHBORH00D(811 aim RRNL BUSINESS k SERNCE A EXIMAING STORAGE AREA- . MQUSHMEHT 1.500 ff/150•10 SPATES SETBACK REWIRED REWIRED REWIRED EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING PROPOSED AESLAIRMM 3,000 ff 36 ffAls kI T 1 WROYEFS(1 PER MIN LOT AREA .15,000 s, 25,000 s, Sow 24413 7 - 5.065 S ),FA k.SF 420584 SF 4Z058k ff - MOM U44IDE FL0OR AREA 4 SEATS i IKR 2 E ROTES)_ Q MIN.LOT AREA PER UNIF 15,000 ff : -].500 W - - 1,166 ff PER UNIT 3,1375 k SE - - - WISINEM OFFICE 16000 SF AA� Mw.LOi fRW TAR 100 R 100 R - 60 R ]10.18 R &.00 R AOR M218 3 44218 ff 10.000 ff/1.000 ff r J•4D V/ Ley R - RNR UWR (>) SACE6 PUa a. ' - 'I '8251R bkR ln.)R 18).)R .. 100 R :100 R 60 R IID.T(UFAYEIIE)/ZJ 8'(MSQ Mw.LOT WOM i,.�-, FE90W11/1. 1.S PFA UNIT 2 UNITS r 1.5•3 SPARS ¢. z mO MAX.LOT COVERA(£ ]GN. . SM 105 W.6W 15.45 '12% ]OS 19.5[ - roiN uWIRF➢ )2 ffARS s° TOTAL PROMOFD 72 WARS U § - OS q _ NR OPEN SPACE 5.T5 iABX - B 22% in 7A �¢�b OE]'1H - 1.6'(UFATERE)/1.S(NEST) 126 R' 1.Y WFSf 4.V(LAFAIErrE)/110"(WE MIN..MMT YARD 15 R 1s R 15 R SI) 1 TOOL4M4 Q 164/O.Yk TO OV ANG 12.0 ITk 45 R IM lffAYETTE OVERHANG: 25'/120'(WEST) PARKING NOTES: O r$0 MR SEE YARD MDTH 10 R 10 R 10 R BY DL FATERE) - SO R f o R 84.0 R 1. EXTERM PANNING BARS FACWG IANDMOE BEDS ARE 9' Q4jT M}�L.yy1 AV ?�/1 NR REM YMO DEPM ]D ft 313 FT 30 R - - 22B R >30 R - WOE AND Jr LUNG MIN A 2'VEHICLE O6 MG Al fl^ ALL.. =p„ - UREA NONACCEMIME PMWNG SPARS MEASURE P WOE NAL ELNUOING HUWT 35 R M R0) 30 FT MEM IMCE_35 R k MEAN RIDGE•245 R k 103.R k 40 R AND 19'LONG ACC6SBIE PARKING AND LOADING SAGES A / MAX IMART-10.5 R 3 MNP.HEIAT=3].3 R k MAX.BNIDING STORIS '25 25 0)'_ - 25 25 2 25 3 SFORIES YEP9dE 8'WR BY IN LW4 4>„ F WN.BUIUHNG SEPARATION 40 R 30 R 23 R v R 40 FT ll IT - 2 EWSMG SITE CAN-ACCOMMODATE SR PAMONG SPARS 1 NET FL00R AREA EXYtUOES WACE FOR STORAGE,HALLWAYS, STNRS UEVAKIRS AND UTIUTIES.. PLAN NOTES: i ( t MIS PIAN IS:PREPARED FW WR MERT USE ONLY FOR THE SPEanc NWOSE OF OSTNNING t'y PFTUBTS AND LOCAL WMOV"ANO IS NOT TO BE USED OR RElEU WON AS A CONSIRUCRON 4. . DXM%SNT OR MY DINER USE BY OMERS WMCUT ME WUTIFN CONSENT OF ME ^ar ,- MORN- EFW GROW. 2 ZDKNG MIRICT BGINDMES COMPILED FAUN CITY R 5NLT1 RIMNG NO DARED MGJSR 2006. 1 SEE VARIANCE AND SECLAL PERMIT GRANTED BY THE SNEM ZONING BOARD R APPEALS W jr RNUMY 20.2016. _ - - _ roMST TRAI DEMOLITION NOTE: �.WMAN -yy ' zv NX1U DUMPSTEA PM ANO 7 q & o M E ENROSUTE 7 I. Al ENSUING STRUCTURES AND ASSOCIATED UMIOES TO BE R/SED UIOEFS OTERMSE NOTED iRF1 WX xSWRJ.SxY W FKNI.DEMGIDW ACIMTES SHALL BE PERFORMED W C UANCE WITH AlUD & m 3)' .lE VFArERE STEEP ¢hm4Y ielw/53 '/� ° nA1E AND FEDE1tP1 RE(.1M110H5 m m R _ ,r^ ` 5 ro BE RFMOYID - 1 IMi1 CRAM WFENG TO H wsiAllED EtGI SBEEi ENTRANCES ro THE BEGNNING By SUBCCT PREFER - CURBING NOTES: Q g g k w. m OO NEAREST PARKING SAM i 2 M"NG VERIHCAL GA)NIIE CURB BUNG REMOVED SHALL BE STAKED ON SITE AND REUSED. CkkI ETE CIMBING 91N1 BE PRECAST OR EXTRUDED IN PEACE a RWDSEPE ME, 1' N.U.L.GD.LEGEND WDM HEIGHT SlT®R w1 Nb PAEMENT SMW0ING fNR $ RI-I 19 19' 41.5AND PUNTED f WW. .� f0 �' ba tO WFfEA(Ire.) a BUS RACK Z 5 R5-1 PR - � 1.0•x_ _ -tom- ' 35 OP.STEPS _ -•� '-N PROP. HANDICAP PARKING - RIPRW.PIANIER BUWNG SPARS 6 SONS 1D "SEE WANUN ON UMFOMI TRAFRC OONI OVACES AND MASSACHUSETTS. yZ� ®(TTP.) . ovERMANG `�' • HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT STANDARDS FOR THE LATEST SUN SPED FKATIONS. - > IEXT.nEQON%RIGR NX)NGNENMNRE a 1r ® - 1> Aw+u6 SIGN SCHEDULE EgUI( /d wmuOm50N 4a15COMMERCI�xc (NOT:TO SCALER 3A57 ff om¢ I. �' PROP. LEGEND, I 2d'E1A-4281 s 6FME 1 I lRWsaRYER +✓'M+�+ fA^ N J JN UA•),w S OFFICE I' V 1.4'.. PAD 7 BEMOVE ANO RELOCATE ElO6T I- ' L ® GR6S5 RDW NEA 26388 S I. 19' u3o0 SIPS FNSi. M" ® EATON BASH L� U-Tn g MNFIG SUNNI-BY OMFRS (,Jn 46 2-FWLY & KIN M CITY R SALEM) i oy��C 1. Q OWEWNG ro O. MAIN YANNCR (CMRDINATE WiN 2XMD fRPIAE IIS OILYc-�� HANdCIPPFO PMIWC Y t PRW. PRdP MT LUNG DWEWNC yy PNN1E0 ETIC fiDW Jd g " n PROP, WE RAW _ DOOR r PANXIFNL wasum sRaS I O M PKWC VASE COUNT 9Y M 1 V Nun ( -B' (DOOR \ rn M s vAvrx 43200 EMSRNG SOT WANE N 4' -r- xS Q LLC.}J3 BN BULWOSE WANIIE CUM YAC_• 4 s-a. , .~ _ $ S tY. QCONCRETE CURB _l EXIST MSMCONCRETE 'I R FEET 5 R`DCW iCAL RECAS ., G VGC VGC MCS WC RE MECAn CtlIWE1F CURB ' vRCP.EASFEMMT ( ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , WwK 4�4'C� NATOCN�WAMIE Gfi9 e1 PROP.SIRIPHNG AND CURB T6_NICNMWT (RI) BY ORRAS(SEE PLWS BY STMTEC - PRW.5'WOE CWC.SRWAU S DA ED RB.4016) M VERT.WAN.CURB I s DGT SURVEY GROUP-NORTH SHORE ' • A DMSION OF DIG?AL GEOCWHIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC O PLAN wIER9:cntti tXTE WiMFNR BY OTHERS-/ T O ¢Q M (WGdlwA1E MM Ott R SAf£N). 18 CENTER STREET TEL 978-465-9992 J CL 0 1020 NEMBURYPORT, MASUITE T. 'v w.dgtaure m W d o U 01950 N ' O ME MORIN-CAMERON MOW,INC 2016 -ZS-Z01LR PRD.I/3358 SOIL TEST LOG(TPWt) STORM GRAIN NOTES: - BY: MICHAEL LMWI.S•#I3M Dere 2/12/16 I. SIORNWAIEA CMNEYANM PIPES SHALL BE 12'HOPE(AOS N-12). O• A IM/2 e�y 2 MUTLL 9fA1 BE CWPM100 10 8514 NAMNUY ORI' DENSITY By FINE SANDY LOAM M - AA910 T-1300 12M00. - 11' 2 q M BIN 10M4/6 1 SEEnHO IF USD,9WL BE RllOVID RIM 0 BACIREIMC 1RFNIX FINS SANDYY LOAN Q ,h 1 UNSUITABLE SOL BSLOW ME NVENT SHALL BE IRMCSID AND XEMACED 3�1 M H APPINVED MATERIA_AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS BA0FU. S UTH-MAMIN YAIL]M NO BE IELITH EMFIN. MUM Fill CI225Y5/1 F(�V @ E�BL3 (IN ' EMSE 1RMSMIER MEEFmiIBi FAC0IMS ANO RFMGFB cS EIEW. GRMUWt FlLL SILT WAN .10 RMAM YEE181G iXE ASW Cal 9FLIfICAAM6(CONCRETE SMD) v �333p IWe•aMZ e 9kIM E�HEA PfN0.�091� f8 221 BP�EPI( _ 56• f N 6 �eoa� 'IW erv.xu Sx �1E 1EP1 FM.ZAA o S UTM BASIN MID DRAIN NAOHOLE MN SEES MY NOT BE IWISIRATED' CMNEtl MIT IY HALE flR M-1 INION/eJ IHY.25.W _ �. MP-RAP SLOPE 10 SCIIE - ".. '.. C2 BION UENS qq TO DOST.ORAOI MMHUE': RIN.�.50 - 9 - PRMECAON MIFRLAANG I£NSS M �r z ori 99 INV(IN}�2110 / / NV.�2415 EIOSr FFNQ l0 BE RFMO4ID. ( 1•) LRD-COORS:SAND k / FAW SUBJECT ..., M-3 - .. - FlNE SANDY LOOM - 3w� w W (DONE 4RATr) (I' C MIM) S / m MwzzR GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: . I A . . Ixv.-21.85 ' REEION:MT.Ulllltt POLE N 0 B ql Naeae j 1 t� 4 .` / �] ffi506 1. THE ATON.O nMi Is O McMLY CAUTIONED MAT IIS TOM AMO/M NO SEf1ISA1 CDMA_MUT NO mE o / EEEVADON ASD ON MUM O NANIOUS MUTY As SxONN ON THESE . ' U1Mtt COMPANIES -/ I --__ ` \� 94 RSI•BRFM IN WRB - MANS L BAS M NTS TM I VNHWS LD. IS NOMINATION AND WIEF£ NO C69AVED GW- ' / '. P059®£,YEASLEmdF1M5 TARx IN nR FIELD. n05 NIFM3UnW 5 NOTROP ry a M 1 H aN 1 \ \�\ 10IM ROMEI UFA_M AND TIU W WHAU_B ME IED IN MALL AREA, HANpSUpE BY COMBACTOR AND SI TO ES SMALL BE VERD®W THE RHD AREA(TN') BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ME STMT M WNST%IPAON. ME S,50.INV. 4ON130 0 Musi CONTACT AUTH THE APPROPRIATE UnTTY CCMPMY ].NY anw q 5+0.5; MM-31.50:INV(A 2&y0 - \ WH_21 �g 1+ RIM TO PFh EXUV AUTHORITY.AND MSTME ET FEUD L CA HWRS ID)-t{ i MV(B}2AJ0 NV RIES \ \ Re.X\10 I PROP. I HIM RIM ANY IXGVAnM MIRK To.REQUEST BE HI FIFOF L Y MU M / (8) ]\ 1 MVON*24.51 1 I Y SMFWNG PENCE MUM AND M ENMEFR SINE BE NOTIFIED C MUMC OF MY MUM ICH /�9 zz .ODw--Ww (C° 0 \` M..(WV-21.—, t. �w( ) MMENAL AC ON 9UllB�TN��MC I NG AND YM TM R.IT NV( 21 I U) :•.. zW`` - 1 . HM INSTALL SLT SOM ERMMI . SMALL BE ME RESPONSMUTY OF THE CCMPhGTM TO RELOCATE ALL T}2 63.E` t T. \ WNIRM AT TWIT M NEW PENCE EIGSNNG MUMS MICH W HUCT MITH.ME PROPOSED MPROMMEMS 1 51 II \ ROOK . To CONSM UNCAL M THE E 22PVN: 113' \I\\ II!_---\ 1' ai e 2 ME CMIRACTM LL'SHABE fRSPQ'L�I£. FM ESTABUSHING `MD S �,yT" MAINTAINING ALL CMIR0. OIN PTS'MD'BMIMMAMS NIEMSMY EM ME d d / L1 303 _ T +11100 _ \ \64. ._ p / MOM. Z Z 9 y ) \ / 'x ME WNiRAC1M SXALL WMODI.Are MIH INE EI£CIIBF-CI®£ AND �' & q b g . :pqM.B'1DPEL TELEPHONE WPMIRS M : US Mi)NIDEA AND.SALEM MUNICIPAL UTW1T m .I SS.X ROOF MUM 1 — eg \ \•} DEPARTMENTS TO NNIFY AE tDUTDN SZE AND TYPE M All MUMS PNM"TD LUION. ME O]NIRACTCR SMALL SAID D DTNY 5 -RIM P) ADVANCE ANCE OTIM MIEN THE UTWtt WINES MLL M INSTAIIID. N - - c vrnsul ' /Sia Lyku.q .I !. \I I AQ •� I� ie /..% �/ UFEEPIRmg Ff1MFACIALkIST SRL6111MG O \ \ T. _ 6 GS let FUOM-1,500 s cMmnoM 1 _ WATER AND SEWER NOTES: Sfi5]9' EF O A 1: +Jz00 _ �1 `.PRM. .. F yM%B5y�l$OfFlC£ ) \\\ b —~ T _i iRAHSipiYEA 1. PHOPoSD WA1FA ANID.4l4£N SEANCE WN0LNM5 91NL BE COOROMAIED d MUSS FIRM:: A 2�9' I 1 r eggs' I.a' PAD Mnl ME SALEM ENCMEFNNG DEPARTMENT. FIRST PUO EIE2-USO 1' i EAST. 2. A NWNUM OF 10 RET CUM HMIZONTM SEPMATON SWL BE MAINTAINED ROP,(9MV-35) �/ UGEplM1Rf£ OMDUIMS RFACE \. _. .21/15lORT OWEWNG To - MNE\P�NT AS ATENJL 5 ANITABY AN n0%N OF 10 FEE.IN MACH CASE IES AND WATIM WES S WNTRACTM 5-002 RAFT \ I (SEE p[`f REL.UN SHALL WNFORN 0 NOTE Na 1 BfLOW. - v� 5 1 ALL CNLM MEA PIPE SHALL BE P&Y)MY. IDE.(PVC) SM15- UN ESS (918 33)SEAR \ : I -� /. DNEIIING xom OIXFANSE NOlE0. II ) 5-0.02 RAFT '� \.� 32 LVasWm 3� 1. M1EIR SMARMY SEWfCS NOT B WATER SED. ME SE A YRNUTA M 10 AT x / SUCHl_ATEA SEMAMM CAT THE ff AOYOF THE NS 6 SHALL t 1 NI AT Slvf PA. SUCH AN EI INMT 1X4.1 1A_MOM!E. Fill THE E 5 AL LEAST IB ABON OF ME SEMEBEI-ow ME N /]21fi JL A 1 Qn$Q S / 4 2A_ -33 CANNOT BE NAMED TD MEET MIOF ME ISS FRWIRWMT. ME�WAIER PPE ..BE _ U. REHOCATED TD PRONDE IMS. S➢ANATIM M'. CONVAMC OD 'WITH ME LLPILENGPE!OF WATER PPE 1S4ll CFNIENEO O`hA INE ?KMMCX-MNT - ./ Aw�_ , MMENElIn- FEET ON EACH SEIE OF THE SEIMEB SO 714.6IMPOSSIBLE-IO OBTAIN Mlim S.PARATIOON OTH ANNIS 101 BE AS FM MOM ME AS�SIP 111) .MOM BOTH THE WATES WE AND ME 5£MA'PPE SMALL BE ENCASED IN--1—, W---V—V W W \YR--y W W —W^W. W N—W W OMMETE FM A ARM DISTANCE M 10 FEET MEN THE MDS ENG POINT OFw W31THE OnRA%PE M MEASURED NMMALLY TRW.All PODIA_ALONG LIE PPE W c I c c c—c c—o c 1 c—c c—c—c W c W o c—c o W —c W c.- W o w a -p 5 WATEP.ME AND SEAEn SEBMW SEES AND LOCANNNS M K CMFBNEO BY W N EM 2 W THE PNDECT MEP ENGNEER PINES TD CMS1R W1KK1: 3 EM i r m1 PRM.sWEA MANHOd Yw wn EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL' Z l I qu.Jva W"" NN itM Nv.(LV-2&CO NWJ].n IW Wye - n e'nv..as 1Y erv.zr.l NV(W1�2].W W xv^ MORY ACCMPED PRACTCES FM REDUCING FROOM AND SDIMENTAMON .. I PRM 1'OIM(CLASS 52)Mf SEANCE EE VIPLOIED IN ME OElELOPMNT M 1M5 SEE (USE iAPPINIG SEEYE R'VM`� PRM 0 IE 6'PM(SIR JS) O ¢ V1 %ECP COI9FR(TIDE K)WAIFA ffRN(E EEMA S 0.w R/FT 1. THE DEMELMNENT OF THE STE HAS BEEN PIMMED 0 MATCH MONO' B T 7. CMPMAAM STM AND SWIOEF VMN: RE .METS:TPM ORNNAW PAIIMMS 10 ME IXIFNi PRACRCASE _ Z-3Q o$Q -PRM.GAS SANM(TNF[LOUnlN, It CEWL) JG m n g 2 SDIMFM coxma MFASIRE9 MLL 8E IP%lED 0 CM1RW ANY LEGEND. - SZE BY GAS CWPANY) AACTM IMENTS 6 ENAOSONY MO DEPOSBM OF SEMAENi9 LL BE CLDSRDCL Y _ ®. MWITMED OURNG CMSIMCAM. Pr3 EATON BASIN ECJ N� 1 IENFMAPY MORON CMVCI YEASIIES Y NCLMDE M NOT BE -UJ ¢ t O MAIN MANHOLE - - - - MLBRD IO, FILM FABWC.SILT FENCES SILT 00M5, S"IDMG AND TTT--- fWLMNG. AND SLT SACKS IN UTA_ BASINS (FM ENG AND NEWLY S� HANDICAPPED PAMMG INsTALLfD). Q V PANIEB muum fMw 1. SITE DMOPMEM NLL NOT CWNENQ UNTIL.ALL TFMPMARY EN(YEN VJ] 1 O - PAANNG 9'ACE MAT - E M EA ME ARES 4.9E N %ACE THESE MEASURES SHAUL BE RMPWIED UNTIL FNM.PANNG AND MEWATE NHRTAAM'HAS BEEN3100 M)POSED TOT MAd)E M 6TAM19®. 1 S ME SAILER ENMNFFAING MPMIYFM SMALL SON AT LEASTO 1B Maj 'ES EWHEN SPOT MADE HWRS PALM M CMSIRUC,IM To INSPECT FR09M WALRUS i0 BE BS BOLTON STAN IMPLEMENTED WRNG CONSINUCAW POST FM AH Z ELEY FT FEET 5 ' ON TP TEST PIT ZO IS TM STAIR in C¢a PROP PROPOSE SCAM 1'-2O Z o U 4mLIARE RET - NiC NAnfIL.MAMTE Mn _ D 10 _ _ _ Q= IF ' D ME MMIN-CMERM MMP,NE RM6 . . MOA.00359 ' - J-5 CMRSES CGY BNIX ", MALE AND COVER T%T MICOEN -TO GRADE AS WWIRED (]'LETIERs MI KwoNj ' - EaIR%%silt sows : .. -. _ � (IT-16'TIACAL'AOR L y', AA\\ +�85 MIRY.ANSA AREA TO BE PROTECTED 3 2. PRECASTICS W AOONOMMC V . SILT SACK NOTES. ,tI MINE SECnW # ' 1. NSTAL.SLT SACKS N M"NO CATDI BANNS.INSTALL SILT SAMS IN g PR SCnON NEW GTtl1 BAMnS Alr INSTALLATION. V S ' i 0GTf5 TO I•IALtT OVER SLT SAMS. E Z �EE 1 NENTS D BEG OR R D PENWwNLY AND AMR ALL WHO B• S EwHiS AND tlG1(ING OR REPI.AC0IENT SHALL BE PERFONAFD MIEN gtIREII 9L1S1%I(SECnON DEPTH OF SKIYENT IS MOM 6'OF GRAM - TI&E AT i5 .41 SrMB ON IV $$ O12AL SPACING NA1Y CAW 8.ASN GRATE 2'SNSNWS WPFACE COURSE PIPE SAMEIFR �. � E . 2'SMAIINW5 SHIER MONK d u i 1 UPSIDPE w\ MTd.SA. 1£NL� PRECAST N S SECnONGltll SILT SACK M1X WFNINC FCRWATER FLOW ' ORPIN PIPE AREATOBEPROTECTED yT Cry ID' CEMENT MNOTETE 0PRECAST smnONAL PLATENxEAL SPADncFav(IESWAWIiAC flFNOVAI ~ ' En TRE OX�*I50XYry wTW NYFACIEO SOBGRAOE SILT SOCK SECTION PLAN MATERIAL AND REPLACE NOTE. WM III MINI PILL) 1. GJW WMT IS A YNMIN 0.10'LOWM Mor To KALE) SILT SACK SEDIMENT TRAP THAN ll C INVERT. (NOT TO SCALE) -TYPICAL.PAVEMENT SECTION (NOT TO scA ) - TYPICAL SEWER MANHOLE ' .(NOT TO SCALE) a yy a - S£AWIT(MON FEOb) ' iRFAIYFNi YM95Li I 24 . WAnm GRANITE OURS VARIES \ TAO(MAT 24'S Ckmoul " 4'CEMENT CONCRETE MI DPIC FACE OR ST.MNCFETE PAVFI2NT Gw(J Plow) -(6'MIN IN RU OSXff12, TOP COURSE(1�'NN.) ' CURSAEHlww MEAS) W.W.MESH SG ALE .I•FREFORMED SLOPE VARIES» 9OEWA(N MPMSIW DONT MSUNO SMEAM «Lss(MAN.) b RRM PR _ O - ENEHr 1111=11 O — BI SAWMT USo IIII 11 TNG T. PAVEMENT AND TAM CWTM 111 c I (fl1ENTCtlltliElE _ ' (]DCO P51-TYPE 1) e'CWPAChD GRAVEL - CWPACTeT CPAVIl 6' G. 12% BASE VIEW SN. MMPACTED SUBTRADE 2C Her 24'Rlev Fini91 ( ) B' Ram 6 B' Acnes B' 1.NO MME MANSON JIWTS AT MN.M PT.OA MM 6"PVC ' PRE-MWWEO OL PILLLR. (SDR-35) Q 2 PRONDE SPOON I JO2115 ATE 0.C. ]. PR M BvomW SH w BE A= vERPCN IL TO MRS. VERTICAL GRANITE CURB F 4. CENEM CONCRETE SHALL BE ANO PSI-TWE IL (NOT TO SCALE) n CONCRETE SIDEWALK e•Y PrL "FF _ DR 5) ' (NOT To scuE) 1REAMENT VMES 5 � a uwMRUNI'MMO . _ fNKAsT TNI aRB _ ISM atl.l res . 1'CHAekFA 0.3cn 12 LL ' .. TAM MAT ('n 2,a BIT 0.YIQ PAVETAENT n H TTP MUTr�(I I'YIN.) IMeI Lae O. N'a 51APE VARES» SIISACE SHEA2 Vn N M KS o 12'uw war a N ' TOP BOTTou �TOP Mv -I— n T* � • III—III ' �� • ` • III TAN MAT CO6'MF.OmPatW MIS it - J`QWPACIEO a v II_ III II ' CO NOTES' SECTION NEW CrueAeE Sime FHh 12' 12' SUBCRAOE _ 2'[TEM. TOE FOOIINC ENTIRE M PERIMETER CFIm PCWO I L DEEM E:5Mill PS MIN AFTER ZB DAYS MALL BEO�W�CIh'ART (]pM PS-TYPE 1) 2 AND G S MINRM MTA AN CAR,.BOARD OF STALE ENALWERS TO PLUMBERS �CRr Z 4DM P9 UN.MMPRw MI ENDS OF All MI] 6 (NN.) 14.2 COVPACIFD CARTEL BASE AND REEGULAMS GAS MO PWNEINO CINE AND APPUCI&E TONAL 6 ITEM N0.M-YTSOOC Yl.&0/ O_ STRENGTH CLTICRIE 8'RIIIX 4CTON5 10 DECEIVE B ALL REWORCEMFNT PFR ASDA OUT - F ' 1/2•SA OONEL M-Y15COCZC 24,TflTi U N z �pA� 4. DEEDO EN N-20 BY W J SUBtltpOE 5. Sff TO BE CMPIPYED BY KOIMICAL ENtlNEER. COMMERCIAL LINE GREASE TRAP (1,500 GALLON MONOLITHIC) cn - CONCRETE DUMPSTER PAD PRECAST CONCRETE CURB SET IN NEW PAVEMENT (NOT TO swE) O O THE MONN-CAN R GROUP.INC.M16 MOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) (� c 1 1 WARNING PA W Zd WEE VHE PAD ARNUNG PA) NAMEN EXISTNC YMEfLO1,M .ROUNDED CORGREIE W by rH WAI&WG PAD PAlflRli ACCESS RAMP DETAIL a EDGE RAWG� - A. f' \ CQkI W;G, 1 : . 'S�Fj:};: ii i. n CONCRETE wl I I�I €"8Da0 S0% \ OaE L y1 If STIl PIPE PULLED MIN T �* CONCRETE AND PAINiFD GpW WA�MdNGD� SEEy fi CIAI➢011 TE910W �( PAD (M l) °a TREATMENT ENT V SEEPAGE ly, Ij 6 1 (MAX) �yWl - - - 1REATMIIIT VARIES fF l� f-).ST ��• 0 S 6'-6'(WN) 2-If VARIES 2_B EIX£Of ROPDWAY s'-e•(NPL) 2•q0.CONCRETE 91WDRi 1 - LOW SSE TRnxeTME A wa sDE TRAN911OR - - I III NOTES:_ - - III COMPACTED GRAM1 6 1. THE MAXMUII ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMP CROSS SIUPES SHNL BE 1.SX OX 1 2 THE YPXIYUM PL.OWABIE SLOPE CR ACEESSBHE RWIE EXCLUDING CURB RAMPS 9H/1L BE 5% _ _ . I THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MPE CR AOZSSBLE ROUTE CURB PAIRS SHALL BE 2.51 m II QM/PACTD SUB GRPDE A A MINIMUM OR J FEET OEM SHALL DE MAINTANNED AT INT PERMANENT OBSTACLE IN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE(I.E..HYORMIS. =ILII=ILII=I II— UTUTI•POLES TIME MELS,siS ETC). S CND TREATMENT VARIES SEE PUNS FOR CURB TYPE 6. BASE OF RAMP SHALL BE GRADED W PREVENT PONDING. - - - T. SEE TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTOR FOR RAW CONSTRUCTMI 1 8. MORE ACCESSIBLE MUMS ARE LESS MAN 5'IN VXDTI(EXCLUDING MRS.)A 5'A 5 PASSING AREA SHALL BE PROMOTE w AT INTERVALS NOT T)E%ffID 200 FEET. NOTE& 9. ELYINATE ALL CLAMING AT RAMP(OTHER THAN VENOM CURBING,IHICH SHALL BE SET FLUSH)WERE IT MUM ROADWAY. L 0.5%TOLERANCE FOR CONSTRUCTOR BOLLARD. d g ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (ACR) TYPE '8' DRIVEWAY APRON/ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYPE'Al ' (xot m scAlE) & p (NOT W SCALE) - (NOT To SGL£) 1 m � Q 24•MM. I MIME BORDER b DQE SACNGRORN 4'mm STRIPE(m) 1 - - - 2C(TYP.UNLESS NOTED a ODE it IT 1 WO W 1. THE STRUT MOTH CR TEE PANTED SYMBOL AND TIE WAD;BORDER MUST �. 1 _ y::. BE MINIMUM IHIIXHFSS Cf S.MM A MAXIMUM MIG(NESS 6 4. » i.H 1`Ei.:..,,:. ` 1 I. PAflAUF19�ACE8 SIA11 RE fip2 l '. 2. BORA E BACKGROUND AND WE BORDER PIE OPTIONAL. F y^' PARKING SPACE STRIPINGDETE . INTERNATIONAL ACCESSIBILITY PARKING SPACE SYMBOL r WAARPENO PAD (NOT W SC E) (NOT TO SCALE) SEE NOTE 9 'W 1/C UP(MAX) - ��PTT Q r—p JU RX - CHA Q. 1 `,Apyl" En (GLVANIM) C WTE STRIPING X-6' U g pe OC AT 45'M LOADING- O a�1 ` AREA(M.) ¢Z¢ zN O gQ R. n� SIDEWALK AND NOTES;_ r o - CURSRAW & 6 I. TIE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB'RAMP CROSS SLCPFS SITYL W.J. BE 1.5%(1% . '" Y4 1My % TIE MAIMAUY ALLOWABLE SUPE OR AC68SELL RDITE EXOUDNG CURB RIPS SHALL BE 5% - am 9ECTCN - M M 1 THE MAXIMUM P3 FEET SLOPE OF BE MAMMAE ROUTE CMB RALAPS SHALL BE -E IN Ni.S �� om Q 4.I A E MAXIM ff J FEEL UESL PE OF BE YNNTNNED TE ANY FERNK SH OBSBE 7E M ACCES9BIE RDJTE - - N N 1 (I.E•HmRANM UTUII'POLES.TREE M mos,ETC) - SOON" 1 CURB TREATMENT VARIES SEE BANS FOR CURB TYPE ORRN. /RMI xME59�ITVTSWB LO 6, B0.ff OF RAMP SHALL RE GRADED O PREVENT PONDING J a T: TEE TYPIGL SOENPL(SECTOR FOR RAMP CWSmUCTOR. CR'WE NUI ANO PAINTED OR PAVEMENT fl INHERE ADOSSBU ROOM APE LEA THAN 5'M WT1(EXCLUDING CURBING)A VY 5'PASSING AREA SMALL BE PRONGED AT INTERVALS NOT TO IXC®200 FEET.EUMNATE ALL CMMING AT RAMP(OTHER LOAM WA41ER 1/ TRAIN AERP) - SEE SIGNSQ!1 4'M M CURBING,MAOI \/9. CUS AU_BE SETELUS)PHERE IT ABUTS ROADWAY. MALS 5/I6•NACMHE SRM£ TMP. m M 10. ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL COMPLY WITH 521:CMR MASS>ONSETTS ARCHUMMM ACCESS BOARD AND SEER OR BLIT ACCESSB7LE - M AMERICANS DSARUMS ACT REGUI-APONS Z NH4EL STP 1B'-0'(TYP.) . VAN ACCESSIBLE O— - F 1 _ &AOS MILT COSI MQL IN)�N PARTA Fl�PVATON 0 J N ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (ACR) TYPE 'A' LLQ vAwewT MAX SLOPE zs IM ALL MrsEcnaxs (NOT W SCARF) N W ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 0 0 1 0 THE MORN-CAMEROM CROUP,INC 2016 (NOT m SCARE) (NOT W HALE) U H PROD.¢ll 9 ALL MAIN NPNHOIE COVERS SHALL BE C%ER LA4 FRAME A531NLY: WALLED ToCONFON WITH PIRW OF USE EWIVAIFNT TO FJW ' RODDWAT PND FUIS1 W1H ROAD SURFACE MBDEE N0.V1410/VNBW-2 - - ' CY BAIXDWRS:S TO Fl(As NE 4RAOE MY (AS fEWRED) PROPOSED F49AI W(ME E1£/.31505 USECOVERE N FRANE TO E11NLl` USE EWIo.141 ro EBW AIS MANF;4 VERS POOR RE NOpEL N0.NHB/'AB00-2 s PRECAST MT RIP - OISTOIA WN AUTO OF C%ER k iPRVE 0.5S19BLY CONE BECTON ROPDWAY AROI➢ENFACE _ M g. Zs 4 oA. ` 24'DV. C��RING WCRIXI CLAY BRICN COURSES -' 7 PRECAST w FROM - ROP OP BPFRF CLAYS TO FINISHED CNAOE '4 C Mf9.1RAlIQ1 - S1E151Y 0.G . INV Y1.90 'ARMED T) �': PIEClST C9NCRETE �.'. pp. •.:.6INY RLCL ) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE (AS REQUIRED) PNECASi MT iW w✓� �w SNALL �2 4 CONN ASNL� =E ' 8• pdFlLF CIN C •. PRECAST MT TOP PRECAST RING SECTION \ 1YOIA NIST FRCP 4J0-B2A - f-pR CIXE WC11W U q$ 1F6L�1 1n 8'BAff1E COWL ��} I 511 € 9 .� PRECASmo CTNOa 7 HOODED2•as 6' RECAST MRS - l _ OUTLET N-12 NIST mom WIN Fl srtn Ir ac _ y PE ' - OPENING fOR _B SPfFIE _ 7R ORMN APE WNL i� CDII�TO MANHOLE ANHLE $ FLOW+ z 3S tY PDS N-12 w M' PLAN 01mET TO DMx-t .'•` .m. sPEc xa c a)e-azA Ycnw Miix •y OPENING FOR MAIN PIPE 6'.CONPACIED(RUSK➢ SECTION A-A ST - RNE BASE PRECAST PIECPSi BUT . . SUE OF BAFFTE WALL 1YDU 12bIA WIN OPENING TRAP k 111W24.36 - FOR BRAN PIPE E, 0 -1 (0- ErCONTROL MUCTUR (1)1 - - 'g`1p1nm (NOT TO SC4E) S' 6'CpIPAC1ED CRV5M0 0'CONPACTED CRUSED STONE BAS: FINISH MOE S STORE SAW 4Y OIA 4•RIBBER I E ANR - -PAN .T(F1 M "14 GALLEY , 1. ECC R 1. CLENiRC CONE SECIIPN LLAT BE SUBSTITUTED � n d d m r - -�••c* -- ,-�rj - _ TYPICAL DRAIN MANHOLE TYPICAL CATCH BASIN g m m Q 7 (NOT TO WAS) (NOT TO SCALE) y .,1F "IHY.MM F. .27-W b - 6 (MN)-Y_1(• _I _ TYPEAL a IYPICAt _ WASHED OPUSHID fi' a 9CN 9(N ESIWf STONE c m� I I (g rtoTExnIE FABRIC DETAIL SECTION a�RurnFmNsae j j p L1 WUPPING(TYP) I I u,_O. . 13- LEIIIFF$FROM ROOF 2•WA CROS C0L9oRY UNDER PAVEMENT S EL EIFFEL PSTEEL 4•LOAM PNO SEED ST.DOW PAWNG. . I -- ---- ---------- _ POST PAffA1FNi WCIIW (SEF DETAIL) Q UWi OF SHED ETRE I M SDECT BM#lLL SNITIHE TO I _ ACEE&WATE SMIACEMAXLUM tl 4MYPACIED IN 1r tY uAuF15 I 0�- PSi i = Z W� CONCHAEGALLEY (SEE DTWU SIDE MEW I U�^ . BOTES'1. COI 6000 PS NNNUM AFTER a DAYS. - 1 LANDSCAPED d AOE -SURFACEWATER OR FOE S RBACE(1' ASCE f1AS B CMIfL BACNLL N o B ' ..2.DESIGNED Fqt AP9R0 X5-20 LOAD.0 10 SFT COVER. NSPECTON PONT I AREA - a TAEC FNT TO C.BOB TO BE VERSED COMPACTED 95S IN Y MAX LIM Z (n F 6 'END i SUE UNITS 00 NOT HAVE ROB-NRU OPEWNM 1 1 iRNE AND WYFR .1 VARIF$ RT NEP FNQNEFA) CWPACTE]CRUSED STONE OR g Q glai ro MISH MADE) CANED ON NO.4 lf'ARO g-d 4-0• -(11P.OF 2) _ - - - 5xaaxc LyE s I I _ _ VON,CONCRETE AS REWIRm 1r F� LJ F7 1^ID'JI WNOWTE II11 ^ SUPPORT w EARTx o N a ' - 2LAN SUPPORT � N Q »� N IIII a.IIII S-0 MIN. -- ' IN -1111=1111= IIII =1111=1111=1111 = L NOTE: FFrri3 1. ALL PIPES 91ALL BE 93135 PRC(SEE 1�3 FCR SIGNS DOILARD MOUNTEU SIGN FLAN FOP SIS AD TYPES) SpUp WAL Fqt - IN I ANDSCAPE AREAS FOR SIGNS IN PARKING AREA PBWEIER OP FlE1D c)= ?J M TYPICAL DETAIL Q m SIGN POST UTILITY TRENCH DETAILZ LW PRECAST CONCRETE INFILTRATION GALLEY - - (NOT TO S(14L) o THE NgiN-CW£TCN MOUP,INC=6 (NOT TO WALT (NOT TO SCIIFJ _ U £ IN PAN./3359 Plant Schedule ° m . o°� .•aw6R Qty Key Botanical Name" Common Name Size ' W TREES: .'.. .g Y 9YELCF➢BNIX MROI e - 91pK 9w.w ma too xuf 3 M Be1Wa dloba M1 ftoge irch 2- R 5 O '+ afi aUma.W. 5R APa lUd6a'Rcd SU W RMS.d NWb 2-2.5Gu 9A w 1 TL TiwcoNate•create m' Gleenapke LXtlNealurltlen 2-25CN w ® w1E MR Pe xa[m¢ws emE u Imlenu - ,�" '3 SHRUB PLANTING 4RPJ JW4WaoM1kaansle•RWaPLR RkaPNmJa &T - � ' SCALE: 1 2 1 -0 SCc CWcm aw a sw'en Pe 1824° f' "M�j MCO CdaeesRr Cammeri'LvxlacY lawwet Cotran W 1&2P V { w CORP Can vire Sweetlan 18-24` I 8 oe e' Ou. O 3]EG"-'Th4a kkeNlb'Sma69d Em Gx ATLMIee &T . � I �u - �c 1REY Tam Watla repwd. En lisM1 alp Yaw 1&24- M &24" 3x' o e eO 0Og0 33H .' J tom M1Lcly®'I4K Cahmne! Hep Cdanrer My &Taa9 6! wLraam:NaW He9em one Ho 1&24' $66_ ' 19G w lebre SM1emmck - Saemmok trtlNe 2-2.5' >< 9 P " VU.nARE PVHT t-Y•umNE EteaRxc LRAPE 10 RE" kea Mgvlice'ldw He I1Ne He N INe Sween Va 2-3, V J - ".14IPS" 5 . •Ma Prtrwess` 111th PNtass ima 1&24".. . ..WR a"SII48R ""10 MC. - MLroObla tleilnsala Stereo t 18-4- ' Y9IR¢OEt Butt NGLDI - 9PAV. kkntal maaw' P ktal Nbarvwe s &T - 21 RM Cabs alba INeeime' Vaa9zed Red " G 23' ' �aum2 aemAP nos 1®HNf BN NtaMat - G wffle AO. 3-0' ai R001BUL _ 3 W Teva mWi.MM.. Nart W Yew. 6S s Rema L an YGECRT M UIPASIM9m Xh ' �-P 1a.13 - '1 OJ _ - fON.D PMmnetla Wlitaw Rosana 1 ..II 105 FG7JPM JP.. R.rseAan d FavAvn Gess 1 et NoIE 10VIR Hepom. eEm SwACM1�hss 1 MMF ]X NUT(6 ROaIB/1L I REYOY£e11dAV Rtl£I10 MRE V1H 51.6811 SID6 rRCY 1W 6 SIC6 fF nL B4US. /W BIAY.WADI AS 910M1MPVn ®REE PLANTING SCALE: 1 2 1 —0 �1-j "ssa]0°alA AA7rrt�QN �9. }Rm R 1ssw/m 5-PAV PAV ' BPJ TL 10-4 PFAStIXIE aJ & < " }EY _ Eesti }ry9. }a . . ti G 18 Alf _ 18 Alf W 1 Ct 30-fE 1D-FG . G'NIGH S ING - w "iFNLE/ND EY PIANIFII BUFPFR { W 111P.) Q 2i f eGl &-N Ws q 74G S WEGLR!k 11MXU $ ���u/ ssaa/1v ZZZ t�S ZQ N N J i5-fG 1 I J J 2-0N I2iC p �8 3-xx. •� 4 Z 3y o�ea Nq� zs _vGG 5Gc to-m tcc to-m ] ]-Fc - W-EST A V E N U E (PURIo-w•MDF) Z ® jamas k.a Iwel I...cmA PLAN g .RLa 1EL a ' 2zallm Pd" - woWel.u4 pleas (.7 J SCALE: I'=20' W.pe1)ao-)w1 Z fu Im1162302'n F 4 0 10 M" 40 Z o - ww.km®ninv.wmm JJQ £ ' O ME UMN CMp GROUP.ING 2M5 IL S PM.IM59 Lamfaaizs Schedule t Symbol QLabel Am>:aagement Deacci SEB 47.7 Xatta 4 W4 14 L SIXGLE AAL OCI4-8RB T4-32LR0 3R 450-BLR-888- 1'0. RZBNER 358/tBID12-BLR 47.7 9�1p C m9 8 W4 IIRGLZ SAAL VM-SM4 32LBD-3&450-BLS-HSS- 6TO-ZBNOR 508/9 2-BLS 49:0 t'1 € 3 P4 SIN= AAL UCW SR T4-32LRO 3S 700 BLR-898/SLA4/0S CPA-4 4 4012-10-DR-BLR" 71' Y. b P6 SIN= AAL UCX-SM-T3-32LBD-3R 700-BLS/SLA4/G8 CPA-4-4.4012-10-DK-RLR 71.2 1 P5L SINGLE AAL UCM SSB TS 3/4-32LeD-3R-700-BLS HTO DIST/SIM/G9 CPA 4 4-4012-10-0][: 71.5 S 1 P4A" SIXGLR AAL GCM-BNB-T4L-3212D 3R 450-BLR-SSS-Z= DIST/SLA4/OS CPA-4-4-4012-10-DX-HLS 47.7 'a4 ��3335S 1 IP40 BACK-BACK AAL DCX-SNB-T4-32IHD-3R-000-HM /SLM-2/GS CPA-4-4-4012-10-DR 71.4 fl op " 2Q,.o t A. ( 4p G a" A. ry z 5 OS 8 & b p.° G 1a1`II/93 0.° 0.0 0 p t r A S. 0 0.0 ° ] °.9AD S S FA D T 9 2 ,Spy 03 3 .1 0° , . ) 0.0 y Zu °8 ° 40 °po ,an C P6O.E S" so p, 0.9 is l> 1, ° " CD Tom. 0 ) 00 `. 31• 1Z�1' 0., 2.9 0j .9 0.5 Q 9. yW4L o.e olsl> ° ° 2., 9 e P o. A'4L � ;° :� a « °., °qs xisr `n1Txu g� p 25954/1)4 .9 a 9d W9L 9 '.� .9 ) o p .s si I' p.z °] a s W9L s o z o Z ... C-2 o p iao �b� IU °.96 ° - U'o N g6I ' . W9L - 1 j 4 ., - °p € O (4a� ogY o.a p� - o ° o s °2 Vz s*oNr° Z stn gQ ' ° 09 W9L " s.z > ., DO WTDF mu.A g Q.�' _ T VwiWo n ° i.p 0.9 DW£wrvc 0 Owm a as rp� o.l 1., 1 W9Z s o.p l to Lwa o)9m sRvs Q ut M I - L s.z o Do '9 l >� nw o ° VOC, s ,.9 .L p.p o op om i✓'Sz 0. ° QryL (PUBCC-10'MOE) jamas k. Cmmansal 1 aasm,'®tss Z LANDSCAPE ARCHIT°L] F - - zzceumla. 4 PLAN 2Z eweir.:a Ma Draw mm SOUL 1'-m' ae�l)m7<�67 a = N 00 iD - bnm4NomsanmvowmA �i1 v aw{mnmmmaw.mm i 018E MOWN-MERON M",INC SAS c PROA 4u59 1 1 , 93'=9' 1 ---- - ' , III1111111 Lu 1 j j j M/JAN.. .ELEC.: O � � 1 ct ' - I 111111111 2/23/16 1 1 FIT AN - - - - - - ARCHITECTS LLC 1 32 C4URCI4 57. SALEM, MA 01970 918 -144 - 8982 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR 8,151 SQ.FT. 5EGOND FLOOR 8,281�.FT. . THIRD'FLOOR 1,944 SO.FT. J( 1 A PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR FLAN TOTAL 2438850.FT. Jf/��\ A'I 5CAL2 1/8" = 1'-m" 1 1 1 1 1 93•-2, I I I � 'MEIJ�;' - - - - - 1 - _ 2/23/16 1 - - - - WAIRDLEY ARCHITECTS LLCGUGH ST, Ll - - - - - - - - - - - SALEM, MA On-10 SIB -144 - 8982 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE I FIRST FLOOR 8,157 SQ.FT. SECOND FLOOR 8781 SQ.FT. ' THIRD FLOOR 1,944 SQ.FT. � - 2 .� 1 A PROPOSED SEC-ONE) FLOOR PLAN TOTAL 24,988$Q.FT. SCALE: 1/8" = 1,0." i 1 1 _ 1 _ 1 1 1 93•-2. LH JU TIM I I I I 1 L 1 I I r - - - P 1 2/23/16 ID 1 ARCHITECTS LLC 1 - - - - - - - - - 32 CHURCH ST. - SALEM, MA Ol BTO L i 13-M -744 - 8982 PROPOSED SOUARE FOOTAGE _ FIRST FLOOR Wrli SO.FT. SECOND FLOOR 5)81 82 FT. THIRD FLOOR 1,944 SQ:FT. 74 — 1 a PROPOSED TWIRD F FLOOR PLAN TOTAL a4-°B So. . SCALE: . I/8" P-m" 1 1 RX-- AT�W rtW W warsoov, - �-- '. " - Tlurm r�wa EiEvdnw �l rt W.w R 1 as as // // as as {/ ! rr ' ;. bEGQ`b RCLR ELEVdiIW (TOP CF wB0.0aZ 1 FITMAN WARDLE"'r ' n PROPOSED LAFAYETTE ST ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CPURGH 5T. ' SALEM, MA ViBI d 918 -744 - 8982 1 1 1 III UL nZ- /I // u IA nocR ELEv ' lice W 9iH-RP.'.R) - � - BEW1O RccR ELEVATIGN. .` , „ '. 1 1 _ 2/23/16 - FITMAN 1 n PROPOSED WEST AVE ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC a-5 SCALE:. 1/8" = I'-m" 32 CHURCH ST. 1 SALEM; MA 01970 9-78 -144 8982 1 11 II 1 1 1 t C� RG4F ELEvdiIW `.� - - ROP 691L-QO."F! y tL TII.®fIOLR ELEVdTIGN _CID (OP 6HID RWW E£GONOROOR ElEVPTIW :. ' Y ROP 6&H-0.CLR) Y `p `a 1 _ it F f TMAN a PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION a-6 ARCHITECTS LLC 32 CHURCH ST. ' SALEM, MA OISIO 918 -144 8982 1 1 1 Cly LLI LIJ LH LL ' RCVF ELEvdil(Ti � - rtar+a wB rxcoF( ' _ wrzm FLoors ELEvdrial ,— rtw a wB rimes I 5ECR9 0.WF ELEVATION (TOP a wB-FLCORI 2/23/16- - F I T1 IAN_ ' n PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION ARCHITECTS LLC I/8" 32 CHURCH ST. ' SALEM, MA 01910 918 -744 - 8982 1 1 5pR NOhce, 331-335 bafoje+{2 5-4 +IAv - II i 1 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Public Hearing Notice City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of 331 LAFAYETTE, LLC for a Site Plan Review in accordance with Section 9.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to reflect the plan for the property located at 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue and 11 West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234). The applicant proposes to construct a three-story 24,388 square foot mixed use commercial building with retail on the first floor and offices on the upper floors. An existing two-family home on the site will remain in its current use. The public hearing will be held on Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 3/03/2016 & 3/10/2016 120 W"1S!f1N,,i ,rr STRH.., S�aT.ta.,ti,ssecn ST rrs 0'19710 - ?110N 91,8.6:95685 FAX 97_>40.0404 HE 3ALEM N E WVS REQUEST FOR LEGAL NOTICE I understand that by signing this form,I am agreeing to the cost Of the legal notice to be published It,.the% newspaper, Payment is required at the time of the ieg6t notice beingreceived by the-IN and before it is published in the newspaper. Please rri checks payable to THE SALEM NEWS: The Salem News Attu:Legal N6ti,-e 32 Dunham Road Beverly,MA 01915 Prepaid cost required to run:$260 "'Inloortard!Average legal notice costs are esimated; customer will either be refunded or billed after the legal notice is published. Checktt Lf (attach check) If payment is not received,the legal notice will be cancelled. rS (Sig prEol S jj r 7-7 Uq­ 4 City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a pablic heariiig for all persons interested in the application of 331 LAFAYEPTE,LLC for it Site Plan ReOow in accordance with Section 9.5 of the 'Salem Zoning Ordinance to reflect the plan for the property Iocaied at 331-305 t afavette Street, 5-7 West Avenue and I I West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232. 233 and 34). The applicant proposes to consteitct a thr -sto y 24,388 squarefoot meed use commercial building with retail on the first floor and offices on the upper floors. Ali existing two-€amily'home on the site will remain in its current use. The public hearing will be held on Thursday,. March 17, 2016 at 7.00 PM, in Room 313, Third'Floor at:120 i V �sliitgton Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during nonrial business hours at the Deparnment of Planning R Community Development;Third.Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem,MA. f 1 B Ben Anderson, Chair g Planning Board Ad to Run Dates Salem News: 3103/2016&3/10/2016 Please Remit Bill To: J imt_ Quiin, Grover,.& Frey; PC 2.7 Congress Street Suite 414 Salem, MA 01970 1lctitioncrPhone: (617) 927-9700 i jS 3 S R r G� t t, r�i.+ t's�Sr".� K� x t. . +'ii .} i� T�� a.',.,,L.S7l•( i' City of Salem Department of Planning ___ Com-inunity Development CHECK R.ECI IPT AND TRACKING FORM DATE 'i�`J BOARD10I1 tom. / STAFF �tyt[S C CLIENT: —Fm-h) aQ t�r, PROPERTY ADDRESS: CONTACT NUMBER: PURPOSEFOR APPLICATION: SPS nahcQ CHECK # AMOUNT RECEIVED! $ -------------- c p pp alp <" T4RdT1 CSUI9�N;DROVER ��FREY P.Ci s ,� rr�.�am�_. , - 2AQONGRESS 9TAEET r ,� `. �nvaWampy- . SUIFA-0tA` • ., 5'�afyM16f37a s: ay a 3 SALLM AAA Ot970` 2 � ry : � ` 53139 I13 i r r t Ffve hundred twenty and tiOtI00 r c , TQTNk < " . ,OA'T]= + y AMOUNT " . CJFOERc4, ,e�>t`fir `: s s r , ;, 02/2St20t@. " � '.M b n q : the Salem*,cNas 3 : AAAA� '- C`'s:. '-,• A3TNOPo$p SRaWr?UBC -#-- Z. $ t I x®009936110 I"01 b`301390Fa 11e00OS66416 0n• m _t AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 23D. (A City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio of a missed meeting and examining all evidence.) Per the City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39 Section 23D, hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have examined all evidence pertaining to//yy�� 331 ^^tgAt1n� �C, which was distributed at the single missed session on I'/SrG� l?, a��b which evidence included an audio recording of the missed session. This certification shall become part of the record of the hearing. Name a A4�� Date P� CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Public Hearing Notice City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of 331 LAFAYETTE, LLC for a Site Plan Review in accordance with Section 9.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to reflect the plan for the property located at 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue and 11 West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234). The applicant proposes to construct a three-story 24,388 square foot mixed use commercial building with retail on the first floor and offices on the upper floors. An existing two-family home on the site will remain in its current use. The public hearing will be held on Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning& Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem,MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 3/03/2016 & 3/10/2016 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.6719.56785 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION OF ABUTTERS AND "PARTIES IN INTEREST" BOARD/COMMISSION: Planning Board PROJECT SITE: 11 West Ave 132_0234 01, 5-7 West Ave 1320233_0) 331-335 Lafayette St { 32_023101 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT: Parties in Interest: The applicant Abutters Owners of land opposite any street or way Abutters within 300 feet Planning boards of abutting cities and towns 1 Assessor's Certification on Applications to the PLANNING BOARD for Site Plan Review, Waivers of Frontage,Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permits,Wireless Communications Special Permits,Cluster Development Special Permits,Planned Unit Development Special Permits, and Business Park Development Special Permits. This is to certify that the time of the last assessment for taxation made by the City of Salem, the names and addresses of those listed on the attached sheets are"parties in interest" (as defined b4above usetts eneral Law Chapter 40A, Section 11) to the parcel(s) of land listedhe p 'ectsite.Assessor's SignatureDate: Number of initialed pages attached: S Once Certified, Return to: Department of Planning and Community Development a� M o ALM EM -grow A V 4 �[ V , . tat OHIO 90"i , � -`.ata�e�t '+i + '..a �. ., `�a S - t ..: + �, 8Q2;� Of 02/29/20f6� 1 .S . ? s + i 'a' a,s5 @ ti !9 3 r' �` e.. +5e m,. + ti ParcellD Location Owner Co-Owner Mailinq Address City State Zip 32-0230-801 327 LAFAYETTE STREET U1 PETERS PAULA M PETERS ALAN H 327 LAFAYETTE ST UNIT 1 SALEM MA 01970 32-0230-802 327 LAFAYETTE STREET U2 GEMSTONE NOM TR/RICHARD RO CHRISTINA BOLTON TRS 32 KENMERE ROAD MEDFORD MA 02155 32-0230-803 327 LAFAYETTE STREET U3 MATKEVICIUS MARK D MATKEVICIUS DAWNA L 16 BEACON STREET SALEM MA 01970 32-0230-804 327 LAFAYETTE STREET U4 MILLICAN KIMBERLY 327 LAFAYETTE ST UNIT 4 SALEM MA 01970 End of Report Parcel ID: 32-0231-0 Parcel ID:32-0232-0 Parcel ID: 32-0233-0 LEE FAMILY TRUONG THOMAS D 331 LAFAYETTE LLC 195 THOMAS E BURGIN PKWY#402 335 LAFAYETTE STREET 75 NENEPASHEMET STREET QUINCY, MA 02169 SALEM, MA 01970 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 Parcel ID:32-0234-0 Parcel ID:32-0229-803 Parcel ID:32-0229-804 GOVE PATRICIA SCHEY NOAH HURLEY SUSANNE PRINCE FAMILY TRUST 323 LAFAYETTE ST U3 323 LAFAYETTE ST U4 3580 SO. OCEAN SHORE BLVD#602 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 FLAGLER BEACH, FL 32136 Parcel ID:32-0229-806 Parcel ID:32-0 - 7 Parcel ID: 32-0212-0 GACHIGNARD MELINDA R NEMIROV LIDIA KELLINGHAUS KYLE 323 LAFAYETTE ST U6 NEM150<SKY FREDERICK 332 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 32KAFAYETTE ST SALEM, MA 01970 LEM,MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0229-801 Parcel ID:32-0229-807 Parcel ID:32-0209-0 MARRERO MARIA ELENA MUNROE JOHN W JR ST.JEANS CREDIT UNION CONNELLY KARA MARIA MUNROE MARSHA S 370 HIGHLAND AVENUE 323 LAFAYETTE ST U1 323 LAFAYETTE ST U7 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0173-0 Parcel ID:33-0411-802 Parcel ID: 32-0215-802 MASS COMMONWEALTH OF FUCHS MONICA M 326 LAFAYETTE NOMINEE SALEM STATE COLLEGE 319 LAFAYETTE ST U2 KALAT GEORGANN J TR 354 LAFAYETTE ST SALEM, MA 01970 326 LAFAYETTE ST U2 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:33-0411-803 Parcel ID:32-0282-801 Parcel ID:32-0216-0 STOLFORS STEPHEN W DAVIS CORINNE A PARK TOWERS LLC 319 LAFAYETTE ST U3 24 WEST AVENUE U1 ATTN: PETER BOHLIN SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 100 WASHINGTON ST.STE#1 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:33-0411-801 Parcel ID:32-0215-801 Parcel ID:32-0282-802 SLACK LISA M TOMICH JEANNE S SOTO KAYRA 319 LAFAYETTE ST U1 TOMICH NIKLOS J 24 WEST AVE U2 SALEM, MA 01970 110 HART STREET SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY, MA 01915 Parcel ID:32-0229-805 Parcel ID: 32-0229-802 Parcel ID:32-0213-801 SMYRNOW ISHMAEL D AMICO ANTHONY GALVIN CHRISTOPHER P 323 LAFAYETTE ST U5 323R LAFAYEETE STREET U2 GALVIN MELISSA SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 1285 PRESIDIO DRIVE WESTON, FL 33327 Parcel ID:32-0213-802 Parcel ID:32-0213-803 Parcel ID: 32-0213-804 HARVEY MICHAEL J SATTER JAMIE M BISBE JOSE A TANG YUHONG SATTER BRYAN G LOPEZ MARISSA A 568 CROSSFIELD CIRCLE 2 DUDLEY WAY 27 WISTERIA ST U4 NAPLES, FL 341044725 IPSWICH,MA 01938 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0284-801 Parcel ID:32-0284-802 Parcel ID: 32-0284-803 WOOD ANNE K NADEL VICTORIA L RUDICEL CHAD W 20 WEST AVENUE U1 20 WEST AVENUE U2 RUDICEL LYNSEY E SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 20 WEST AVENUE U3 SALEM, MA 01970 / V Parcel ID: 32-0225-801 Parcel ID:32-0225-802 Parcel ID: 32-0230-801 BRIGGS CHERYL MCGUIRE MARK PETERS PAULA M 29 WISTERIA ST 1.1 FREDERICKSON JULIA PETERS ALAN H SALEM, MA 01970 26 SLOCUM ROAD 327 LAFAYETTE ST UNIT 1 LEXINGTON,MA 02173 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0230-802 Parcel ID:32-0230-803 Parcel ID:32-0230-804 GEMSTONE NOM TR/RICHARD MATKEVICIUS MARK D MILLICAN KIMBERLY CHRISTINA BOLTON TRS MATKEVICIUS DAWNA L 327 LAFAYETTE ST UNIT 4 32 KENMERE ROAD 16 BEACON STREET SALEM,MA 01970 MEDFORD, MA 02155 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel 1D: 32-0224-801 Parcel ID:32-0224-802 Parcel ID:32-0224-803 OLEARY JAYNE FEATHERSTONE PETER WATERS WILLIAM FRANK 25 WISTERIA STREET U1 7 OAK HILL BYNOG ANDRIA JOYCE SALEM, MA 01970 PEPPERELL, MA 01463 25 WISTERIA ST U3 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0224-804 Parcel ID:32-0092-0 Parcel ID:32-0207-0 VO DIANA VINCENT SUZANNE ONEMBO CHYNA L 35 JANE ROAD 112 LINDEN ST 101 LINDEN STREET MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0214-0 Parcel ID: 32-0223-0 Parcel ID:32-0228-0 LAFAYETTE STREET, LLC KAPANTAIS STEPHEN DALY RICHARD E 24 WOLCOTT ROAD KAPANTAIS STEPHEN C LOUISE B LYNN, MA 01902 23 WISTERIA ST 321 LAFAYETTE ST SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0235-0 Parcel ID:32-0238-0 Parcel ID: 32-0239-0 ZAWISLAK GREGORY A& HOUGHTON JERROLD S PINEROS-SHIELDS THOMAS 13 WEST AVE HOUGHTON ANN E PINEROS-SHIELDS SANDRA SALEM,MA 01970 5 BRISTOL ST 7 BRISTOL ST SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID: 32-0243-0 Parcel ID:32-0244-0 Parcel ID:32-0245-0 LUNDERGAN JANE F JALBERT MARK E BLATTBERG GARY 10 BRISTOL STREET JALBERT KENNETH C 10 NAPLES ROAD SALEM, MA 01970 8 BRISTOL STREET SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0247-0 Parcel ID: 32-0249-0 Parcel ID:32-0250-0 OSTERBERG SHAYNE DO ALLYN HANGERLAURA OSTERBERG RICHARD 21 WEST AVE 23 WEST AVE 17 WEST AVE SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 _ Parcel ID:32-0251-0 Parcel ID: 32-0252-0 Parcel ID:32-0285-0 BAUER DANIEL P MORNEAU GENEVIEVE J GEORGE JOAN C BAUER DIANE L MOREAU PAUL H GEORGE JAMES NICKOLAS 1 PLYMOUTH ST 3 PLYMOUTH ST 1 BELLEAU RD SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0286-0 Parcel ID:32-0287-0 Parcel ID: 32-0316-0 MARKOWICZ STELLA WILLIAMS JILLIAN A NIKOPOULOS NICK C C/O MARKOWICZ JOSEPH M 3 BELLEAU RD VIOLETTE CLAUDIA J 1A BELLEAU ROAD#1 SALEM,MA 01970 10 BELLEAU ROAD SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 / Parcel ID:32-0317-0 Parcel ID:32-0318-0 Parcel ID:32-0319-0 MACKINNON RICHARD A MULHOLLAND BRIAN J LUTFIJA NIJAZI MACKINNON KATHLEEN A 6 BELLEAU RD LUTFIJA ERMIRA 8 BELLEAU ROAD SALEM, MA 01970 4 BELLEAU RD SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID: 32-0321-0 Parcel ID: 32-0324-0 Parcel ID: 32-0325-0 TKACZUK JOHN SAUNDERS WAYNE S JR FRANK AND LIANNE 8 WEST AVE SAUNDERS GRAZIELLA CAPPUCCIO FRANK/LIANNE SALEM, MA 01970 343 LAFAYETTE STREET U2 345 LAFAYETTE ST SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:33-0410-0 Parcel ID:33-0412-0 Parcel ID:33-0413-0 317 LAFAYETTE ST. RLTY BAY VIEW REALTY TAISTRA PAUL PELLETIER JOAN TR MOCCIA JOSEPH E TR TAISTRA SARAH P 317 LAFAYETTE STREET 73 LITTLE NAHANT ROAD 12 CLIFTON AVE SALEM,MA 01970 NAHANT, MA 01908 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID: 33-0414-0 Parcel ID:33-0416-0 Parcel ID:32-0320-0 CURRAN REBECCA L MARGERUM EDWARD S DECAMP JOHN A III 14 CLIFTON AVE MARGERUM EILEEN G DECAMP MARGARET B SALEM, MA 01970 17 PLYMOUTH ST 10 WEST AVENUE SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID: 32-0281-0 Parcel ID:32-0253-0 Parcel ID:32-0226-0 REARDON KARYN A HAYS BETTY CAMPBELL ANGELA M WILLIAM F P 0 BOX 357 SCHUTT GEOFFREY 26 WEST AVE OLDSMAR, FL 34677 39 WISTERIA STREET SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0291-0 Parcel ID: 33-0409-0 Parcel ID:32-0254-0 MITCHELL JOHN E MARBLEHEAD OFFICE, LLC EARLE CHARLENE MITCHELL NANCY A 8 DOAKS LANE GILBO DARCY 22R WEST AVE MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 13 PLYMOUTH STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0222-0 Parcel ID:32-0248-0 Parcel ID: 32-0091-0 BURNS ROBERT J DICESARE DAVID FISCHER SAMUEL G BURNS MARY E 19 WEST AVENUE 8 LORING AVE 36 PINECLIFF DRIVE SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 Parcel ID: 32-0246-0 Parcel ID:32-0217-0 Parcel ID:32-0237-0 BUCKHOFF DAVID J PARK TOWERS,LLC 15 WEST AVENUE REALTY GROGE KATHRYN H 732 LYNNWAY MELCHER GILDA M TR 4 BRISTOL ST LYNN, MA 01905 9 POPLAR STREET SALEM, MA 01970 DANVERS, MA 01923 Parcel ID:32-0326-0 Parcel ID: 32-0323-0 Parcel ID:32-0242-0 HEIDI REALTY TRUST HEIDI REALTY TRUST LUNDERGAN JANE E MARKOS CONSTANCE TR MARKOS CONSTANCE TR 10 BRISTOL STREET 241 LAFAYETTE STREET 241 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID: 32-0283-0 Parcel ID:32-0241-0 Parcel ID: 32-0208-0 NOELLA GUY LAUREL CARTER MARIA RITA RPS REALTY 22 WEST AVENUE 11 BRISTOL STREET C/O SCOTT NGUYEN SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM, MA 01970 1 CURTIS STREET EAST BOSTON, MA 02128 Parcel ID:32-0322-0 Parcel ID: 32-0288-0 Parcel ID: 32-0292-0 SEARS SHAWN DANCEWICZ BARRY CUMMINGS DAVID R 6 WEST AVENUE 5 BELLEAU RD WILKINS-CUMMINGS KIMBERLY SALEM, MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 24R WEST AVE SALEM, MA 01970 Parcel ID:32-0327-0 HEIDI REALTY TRUST MARKOS CONSTANCE TR 241LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 V CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Public Hearing Notice City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of 331 LAFAYETTE, LLC for a Site Plan Review in accordance with Section 9.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to reflect the plan for the property located at 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 West Avenue and 11 West Avenue (Map 32, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234). The applicant proposes to construct a three-story 24,388 square foot mixed use commercial building with retail on the first floor and offices on the upper floors. An existing two-family home on the site will remain in its current use. The public hearing will be held on Thursday, March 17, 2016 in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 at PM, Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning&Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem,MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 3/03/2016 & 3/10/2016 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.6119.56)85 FAX 978.740.0404 • WWW.SALEM.COM Spy pep}_ comments 331-' 35 2ks+. 5-WWes-)--�� i Amanda Chiancola From: kirt rieder <kirt.rieder@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 10:21 PM To: Kirt Rieder Subject: Fwd: 331 Lafayette St. Salem ---------- Forwarded message--------- From: Kirt Rieder<kirt.rieder@amail.com> Date: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:25 PM Subject: Re: 331 Lafayette St.Salem To: Kirt Rieder<krieder@hargreaves.com> Thanks for the message. Your synopsis covers most of the topics of discussion. My primary objective is to advocate for the continuity of the existing neighborhood tree canopy, particularly since the prevailing canopy is mature and figures so heavily in the identity of the area. While it is impossible (both practically and financially)to instantly achieve a mature canopy through the installation of new trees, it is important to invest in the future now, at this prominent location. Two neighbors mentioned the species by name (a very rare occurrence in these meetings) of both trees undoubtedly to be removed by the project(Molus and Gleditsia). Other neighbor comments focused more generally on perimeter screening,together underscoring the salient importance of trees in this project. Embracing trees as a core component of the proposal communicates the applicant's willingness to respond to neighbor concerns in a comparatively inexpensive way, with long term value and impact on neighbors. The reality is that 2-3" or 3-4" caliper shade trees are not going to compete with the building architecture or retail viability in any measurable way, as their canopy will be so sparsely branched for the first decade as they acclimate to their new environment, providing the retail occupants with more than adequate time to geographically establish a marketable Lafayette St presence un-impeded by shade trees. Front St in Salem is exhibit"A" that a retail street and shade trees are not exclusive or at cross purposes, rather, Front St is that much improved as a retail destination and shopping experience because of the trees, and they are massive. Sure,the context of Front St and Lafayette St differ,yet street trees figure prominently to establish a pedestrian scale and perceptually improve pedestrian safety as a intermediary presence between building and fast moving traffic. I've long been a fan of Ginkgo. I've recently used them in front of a new mixed use retail and residential project @ Rutgers in New Brunswick,a project not dissimilar to this one by a private developer on a prominent corner, including a Starbucks and five other campus-focused food vendors behind Gingko and other shade trees. Having planted two 3" Ginkgo bilobo 'Magyar' in my own small backyard less than two years ago, I can attest to how sparsely branched they are and will be for some time,yet the promise of growth made the investment worthwhile. There is also a sizable Ginkgo along my street, and though it is+30'tall, it doesn't obscure the house to which it belongs. I digress on the the topic of Ginkgo to support your selection of the species. While there are countless varieties you can select from,Autumn Gold, Magyar,and a dozen other, Princeton Sentry is the one I disagree with for this project because it will never provide the street tree shade canopy this project merits. The gist of my comments supported the identification of oak, maple and ginkgo, with the urging to reevaluate the Princeton Sentry for a more substantial presence. The second topic was the corner plaza, and the need for further fleshing out how it is designed. Other commission comments focused on and emphasized the perceived need for pedestrian safety adjacent to Lafayette St. I've always been a fan of stone monolith seat walls,as in front of the Liberty Hotel across the street of the MGH T station in Boston. Acknowledging that you may not have quite that budget,that's why I provided the precedents within Salem State, including the substantial cast in place site walls with expressed board for work, at both Viking And Marsh halls, 1 and the seat walls at the library. My observation is that the expression of safety and visually detailing will be much more successful in either stone or cast concrete,than in brick veneer: the renderings appeared unnecessarily fussy. The question of handrails for steps arose as well. While I have built public stairs that have either had rails at each set of steps or solely at the primary route of egress, it begs clarification from the applicant's design team to clarify code compliance here. Note that the sweeping stair at Viking Hall has the required flanking rails close to the building while the remaining sweep of steps is rail free. Editing of the site planter/walls/seating could help simplify and clarify the public presence of the project. Theses topics, in addition the landscape items you have listed, and the comments regarding the facade expression, point toward why a formal design review process would benefit this project. You've got two members of two boards willing to make constructive comments to help move this project forward. Would be great to hear at the next presentation that this project would willingly utilize is resource,further demonstrating a willingness to work with the community to shape the project. Sent from my iPad On Mar 25, 2016, at 6:41 PM, Kirt Rieder<kriederPhargreaves.com>wrote: Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From:James Emmanuel <James@iamesemmanuel.com> Date: March 23, 2016 at 1:00:53 PM EDT To: "krieder@harereaves.com" <krieder@harereaves.com> Cc: "'Robert Burr' (rburr@burrinvestments.com)"<rburr@burrinvestments.com> Subject: 331 Lafayette St.Salem Good Afternoon Kirt, I am James Emmanuel,the landscape architect working with Bob Burr(copied here), who is the developer of the 331 Lafayette site in Salem. I was unable to attend the last planning board meeting in Salem in which site plan elements were discussed. I received a message from Scott Grover, the applicants lawyer,that we might be able to communicate directly a bit on this so we can come to the next hearing with some revisions that are responsive to some of the discussion items brought up during the meeting. As I understand it the landscape scope concerns included: 1. Proposed Tree variety, size, quantity, and caliper. 2. Screening to residential areas. 2 3. Character/materials of paved 'plaza'area adjacent to Lafayette St. 4. Planter size/seating configuration and integration. 5. Steps& handrails. 6. Fencing&dumpster enclosure details. Perhaps there are additional items. We certainly can come back with an updated plan indicating larger trees throughout the parking area and abutting residential areas. Additionally we are looking at different ways to detail the scale of the paving at the corner plaza with an integration of unit pavers/concrete,etc. We would likely be looking at using structural soils as a means to improve root zone soil volume for the trees without losing too much of the paved space. A priority for the project as expressed by the applicant has been to maintain accessibility and visibility of the retail spaces along Lafayette St. To that end,the Princeton Sentry's were proposed. (Note there are five of them proposed within a relatively short span.) There are a few other issues that contributed to the proposed design of planter/steps as shown on the proposal. Perhaps we could discuss this more specifically at some point. Thank you for your attention to this message. If you wish I correspond with you via a different email address please let me know. I am available for a site meeting this Saturday if that would be of benefit. Look forward to engaging more directly to get all items addressed. Sincerely, James Emmanuel James Emmanuel, RLA LEED AP 22 Carlton Rd. 3 Marblehead, MA 01945 Tel. 781.622.7487 james(@iamesemmanuel.com 4 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 02/25/2016 TO: ( ) BUILDING COMMISSIONER ( ) CONSERVATION COMM ( ) CITY ENGINEER ( ) FIRE PREVENTION (0 ) BOARD OF HEALTH ( ) SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) DISABILITIES COMMISSION ( ) POLICE DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SERVICES O MASS IN MOTION Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to the Zoning Ordinance and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to Amanda Chiancola, she can be reached by phone at 978- 619-5691 or email at achiancolana salem.com ( ) Preliminary Subdivision Plan ( ) Definitive Subdivision Plan O Waiver from Frontage ( ) Drive-Through Special Permit ( ) Cluster Development O Planned Unit Development .. " (X) Site Plan Revtew ( ) Business Park Development District ( ) Wireless Communication Facilities Special Permit ( ) North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permit ( ) Flood Hazard District Special Permit APPLICANT: 331 Lafayette,LLC,c/o AttomeyScott Grover PROJECT NAME &ADDRESS: 331-335 Lafayette St., 5-7 West Ave., 11 West Ave CONTACT PERSON: Amanda Chancola COMMENTS DUE: Requested by 3/10/2016 for the 3/17/2016 hearing. ( ) CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) ( ) NEED MORE INFORMATION(Explain on reverse side) ( ) CANNOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) (.�r&MMENTS INCLUDED Ak� Reviewer's gaature Title Date 1210 C4 FSH13G FON S'Lkl t 1 S ,l.fh\ , N11 ,SACH(Sl'TCS 01979 ' PH'oA'P.W8.619.>6b5 . FAX 97/8,740,0404 Board of Health Comments: • In addition to standard conditions there is no trash handling storage area that is shown on the site plan, please provide • Sheet D-1 Section view for Grease interceptor references Town of Danvers Regulations, please change to City of Salem • Provide a cleaning and maintenance plan for the external grease interceptor enA - 0 z Q� oir,�oi A h` Qo I �a - j o C/M1NF%3' Salem,MP BOARDOF HEALTH LIST OF CONDITIONS 1. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name, address, and telephone number of the project (site) manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project. 2. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible for the site certifies that soil and ground water on the entire site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use. 3. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer. 4. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior to construction, demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent 5. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction. 6. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control and street sweeping which will occur during construction. 7. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and removal of debris, vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material generated during demolition and/or construction. 8. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting. 9. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations, including but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. 10. The developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill material needed for the project. 11. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health. 12. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met. 13. The developer shall provide a plan showing how grease in gray water is contained, prior to it entering the city sewer system in developments with 10 or more units and in compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer 14. Salem sits in a Radon Zone 1 and the risk of radon entering buildings is extremely. Therefore, the installation of radon mitigation systems is required. CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 02/25/2016 TO: ( ) BUILDING COMMISSIONER ( ) CONSERVATION COMM ( ) CITY ENGINEER (H) FIRE PREVENTION ( }BOARD OF HEALTH ( ) SCHOOL DISTRICT O DISABILITIES COMMISSION O POLICE DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SERVICES ( ) MASS IN MOTION Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to the Zoning Ordinance and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to Amanda Chiancola,she can be reached by phone at 978- 619-5691 or email at ac)iiancola(@salcm.com. ( )Preliminary Subdivision Plan ( )Definitive Subdivision Plan ( )Waiver from Frontage ( )Drive-Through Special Permit ( ) Cluster Development ( )Planned UnitvDevelopment e-m .n e ww ( ?Stte�Plan R eie ( ) Business Park Development District ( )Wireless Communication Facilities Special Permit ( )North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permit O Flood Hazard District Special Permit APPLICANT: 331 Lafayette,LLC,c/o Attorney Scott Grover PROJECT NAME &ADDRESS: 331-335 Lafayette St., 5-7 West Ave.,11 West Ave CONTACT PERSON: Amanda Chiancola COMMENTS DUE: Requested by 3/10/2016 for the 3/17/2016 hearing. (X) CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL(Explain on reverse side) ( )NEED MORE INFORMATION (Explain on reverse side) ( )CAOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL(Explain on reverse side) ( ) CC C iMENTS INCLUDED il�q�wv� Reviewer's arum Ti!le!e - Dale 120 WASI111NGmN STREET.SALU1.MASSACI WSHI'M 01970 - NOW 978.619.5685 ' FAX 978.740.0404 WWWSALEAi1.COk1 Pushed snow will not interfere with parking causing vehicles to extend into travel lanes or reduce clearance for emergency vehicles. Computer generated prints of emergency vehicle turning radius within the parking area. All fire protection systems shall remain active until the day of demolition. Fire prevention shall be notified by the GC when cutting and capping wilt be taking place Demolition site shall be fenced and secured at the end of each work day. 120 WASHINGTON STREET.SALEM.MASSACHLISFITS 01970 PIioN\%978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 W W%V.SALEAILCOM a. CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 02/25/2016 TO: ( ) BUILDING COMMISSIONER (0) CONSERVATION COMM ( ) CITY ENGINEER ( ) FIRE PREVENTION ( ) BOARD OF HEALTH ( ) SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) DISABILITIES COMMISSION ( ) POLICE DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SERVICES ( ) MASS IN MOTION Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to the Zoning Ordinance and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to Amanda Chiancola, she can be reached by phone at 978- 619-5691 or email at achiancola&salem.com. ( ) Preliminary Subdivision Plan O Definitive Subdivision Plan O Waiver from Frontage O Drive-Through Special Permit O Cluster Development ( ) Planned Unit Development (Y.) Site Plan Review ( ) Business Park Development District ( ) Wireless Communication Facilities Special Permit ( ) North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permit ( ) Flood Hazard District Special Permit APPLICANT: 331 Lafayette,LLC, c/o Attorney Scott Grover PROJECT NAME &ADDRESS: 331-335 Lafayette St., 5-7 West Ave., 11 West Ave CONTACT PERSON: Amanda Chiancola COMMENTS DUE: Requested by 3/10/2016 for the 3/17/2016 hearing. O CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) O NEED MORE INFORMATION (Explain on reverse side) O CANNOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) I ¢�f COMMENTS INCLUDED c,,,"—'' Sc%,�S c .�kA �o r 20 ev er' iature Title j6ate 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM,MASSACHUSEFIS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 - FAX 978.740.0404 WWW.SALEM.COM ���31-335 5-�, n weoF �� �-�- sq� 12e V�`E� _ _ _�- I 7- FST � "xFrR-Ri, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. now 5 Burlington-Woods Drive Suite 210,Burlington MA. 01 803-4 51 1 Ste .. May 13; 2016 File: 179410052 Attention: Ms.Amanda'Chiancolo, Staff Planner Department of Planning&Community Development Salem City Nall Annex 120 Washington Street, 3rd floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Feer Review of 33.I Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue Dear Amanda: Subsequent to our letter report of May.3, 2016 and pursuant to the Department of Planning & Community Development Department request, Stantec Consulting, Inc. (Stantec) has reviewed the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan,Supplemental Submittal, a proposed Mixed Use Commercial Building in Salem Materials received to date include the following:; Site Plan Sheet Nos. C-3, C-4, D-1, D-2, D-3, revised May 4, 2016; Supplemental stormwater management documentation and written response letter, dated May 5; 2016 to >Stantec's review, letter of'May 3, "2016 each as prepared by"the Morin! Cameron;Group, Inc. (MCG) In general, the supplemental,submittal adequately addresses our,previous comments. We offer the following remaining comments regardirig Traffic; Drainage, Sewer and Water for the Department's consideration: Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements Our previous Comment Nos. 1 thru 4 and 5 discussed the parking lot design of one-way circulation with 90-degreeparking, driveway aisle width, parking space dimensions and location of several parking spaces in regards to traffic circulation, vehicle maneuvering in/out of parking spaces and passage ways to exit the vehicle,. As noted in MCG's,response letter, the plans were revised to provide.a_slight angle to the main entrance;parking spaces entering from Lafayette Street In"addition; the parking aisle along the east side and parking spaces to the south were shifted to improve circulation and vehicle" movements. A "small car parking sign" is provided at several space locations to deter larger vehicles. ;The proposed modifications will s!!ghtly improve the ability to pull into the,proposed parking spaces and will slightly reduce the chances of vehicles driving the wrong way. Ideally, theparkingwould' be angled by a minimum of 30 degrees. As it is currently designed, drivers of larger vehicles<(SUVS; i a May 13, 2016 ,. .. - .. Ms Amanda.Chioncolo,Staff Planner' Page 2 of Reference: Task Order No 34 of MSA 0-37 (B)-Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street.Mixed.Use Commercial. - Building Site:Plan in Conjunction with Signal/intersection:Modificatlons at Lafayette Street/Loring. Avenue minivans, etc) may need to "straighten" their car after pulling into the parking space. If the proposed use were predominately retail, with high parking turnover, this configuration would lead' to a poor operating parking lot. However, since the proposed use is predominately office, with, lower parking turnover, these issues are likely manageable, iSimilarly,_since a high proportion of the parked vehicles are expected to be employees,-the users are lesslikely to travel in the wrong`' direction. We recommend these latest plan modifications be further discussed by the applicant wifhahe planning departments We continue to have concerns about the proposed parking space immediately adjacent to the entrance to the site. If this space is unable to be eliminated, we recommend restricting the use of this space to ensure that the least amount of drivers utilize this space.- The pace.The sign detail has been updated as requested. Task 34.2 Drainage In regards to Standard No. 8, we recommend a schedule for construction,and stormwater management activities such as construction phasing, location of material stockpiles, equipment storage and refueling areas be provided on the plan. As noted in MCGs response letter, the applicant has agreed to provide the above referenced information and construction documents,,package to the planning department prior to construction. Task 34.3—Sewer Our previous Comment Nos. 1; 2, 3 and 4 requested additional information regarding proposed grease trap,sewer service, utility crossings and invert elevations. As noted' in MCG's response letter, the applicant has agreed to provide final utility design drawings and construction document package to the engineering division and/or other applicable departments prior to construction., Task 34.4- Water Our previous Comment No. 1 requested the proponent complete a:hydrant: flow test at the project site to confirm that the existing water distribution system can supply the domestic and fire protection requirements for this project without further improvements to the existing City infrastructure. - As noted in MCG's response letter, a.hydrant flow test will be conducted by the project MEP May 13, 201,6 .. Ms Amanda:Chiancold,Staff Planner Page 3 of 3 Reference:- Task Order,No 34 of MSA 0-37.(8)-Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street-Mixed,Use Commercial, Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection.Modifications at LafayetteStreet/Loring Avenue',.: during the building phase and final utility design drawings, including construction documents, will be submitted to the engineering division and/or other applicable departments prior to construction. If there are any questions or concerns regarding our comments herewith, please do not hesitate to contact Richard Azzallna, P:E. Associate or myself at 1-800-835-8666. Very truly yours, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.aA Richard A. Azzalloo, PE Associate G i t FST • !00 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. now 5 Burlington Woods Drive Suite 210,Burlington MA 01803-4511 Stantec April 14, 2016 File: 179410052 Attention: Ms.Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner Department of Planning&Community Development Salem City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street,3rd floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Sheet/Loring Avenue Dear Amanda: FST; now Stantec, is pleased to submit the attached Task Order No. 34 in connection with our Master Services Agreement (MSA) 0-37 (B) dated April 22, 2013. Task Order No. 34 includes the following: Peer review of the Lafayette Street/West Avenue Site Redevelopment Plan in coordination with our recently-bid signalrntersection modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue • For Task Order No. 34; we have developed our proposal based on our experiences working with the City of Salem(City)and our familiarity with the area. Our proposal identifies, by task, the scope of services and estimated fee .anticipated to facilitate the completion of this task order assignment. For Task Order No. 34, we propose a total Not to Exceed Fee of$6,864 as detailed in the attached Task Order No. 34 Agreement provided herewith for your review and approval. Please feel free to contact me at 781-221-1221 if you need any further information or scope changes to the attached Scope of Services. Stantec looks forward to assisting the City of Salem in undertaking this important South Salem assignment. Very truly yours; f St � c Consulting i jrvice , Inc. I St?"c Richard A, AZzalina, PE J Associate • Design wile community in mind TASK ORDER NO.34 TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 0-37 (B) BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR MASTER SERVICES (NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE SERVICES) This is Task Order No. 34 attached to and made part of the Master Services Agreement 0-37 (B) dated April 22, 2013 between Fay,Spofford&Thorndike, LLC(FST),now Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., 5 Burlington Woods, Burlington, MA 01803 (ENGINEER), and the City of Salem (City), 93 Washington Street, Salem, MA 01970 (OWNER). This Task Order No. 34 describes the Scope of Services, Time Schedule, Charges, and Payment Conditions for the Task Order known as: Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan In conjunction with the Signal/Intersection Improvements at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue. Materials received to date include the following: • Site Plan Set (16 Sheets),-dated February 25, 2016 and supporting documentation as prepared by The Morin-Cameron, Group. Inc.(MCG) • Stormwater Management Summary,dated February 25,2106 and Environmental Impact Statement as prepared by The Morin-Cameron, Group, Inc. (MCG) PROJECT OBJECTIVE The purpose of Task Order No.34 is to provide technical engineering support services to the City in its • review of the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in conjunction with the signalized Intersection improvements of Lafayette Street(Route 114)at Loring Avenue(Route IA) and West Avenue as proposed by the City of Salem.Stontec previously reviewed preliminary Information provided by the applicant identifying impacts to the intersection of Loring Avenue/ Lafayette Street/West Street in conjunction with the proposed improvements to the intersection. The preliminary submitted material did not include a traffic impact study to Identify impacts of the project. SCOPE OF SERVICES Our peer review will consist of the following categories:traffic,Intersection Improvements,drainage . and utilities. Task 34.1 -Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements We note the previously submitted preliminary material did not Include a traffic Impact study to Identify impacts of the project. Information supplied previously was contained in emails and analysis i printouts. We recommend at a minimum,that the proponent submit a brief summary memorandum of the trip generation and the impacts of the project. Since we anticipate a brief memorandum, our review will be limited to a cursory review of the findings. i Stantec will review the site plan submission for potential civil/site impacts such as additional street widening, sidewalk improvements and/or geometric modifications to the public right-of-way from the site. We will also review the site plans to identify any site circulation issues, as well as reviewing i the on-site signage and striping. f I . Task 34.2-Drainage • Review of the storm drainage system layout as illustrated on the site plan and supporting documentation for conformance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Management Standards and generally accepted engineering practice. Task 34.3-Sewer • Evaluate the proposed sewer system for compliance with City standards and general engineering practice. This will include a review of the sewer service configuration and proposed construction details. • Review data and calculations used to establish wastewater flows generated by the development and determine consistency with Title V criteria and other applicable standards. It is assumed flow calculations will be provided by the applicant. In addition to the capacity of on-site sewer facilities, the capacity of the mainline sewer to which the service connects will also be evaluated. The review will also consider any information the City may have on the available capacity of the municipal sewer system in the project area. Task 34.4-Water • Evaluate the proposed water system for compliance with City standards and general engineering practice. This will include a review of the water service configuration and proposed construction details. • Review data and calculations used to establish water system demand by the development and determine consistency with Title Vcriteria and other applicable standards. it is assumed estimated water demand calculations will be provided by the applicant.The review will also • consider any information the City may have on the available capacity of the municipal water system in the project area. Task 34.5- Prepare a Technical Memorandum with Findings and Recommendations • After reviewing materials submitted by the applicant, Stantec will prepare a technical memorandum summarizing findings and recommendations for the City of Salem. Task 34.6-Attend up to two meetings to discuss our technical memorandum. • At mutually agreeable times, Stantec will meet with the Department of Planning & Community Development to assist In evaluating the potential site plan impacts in relation to the proposed improvements associated with the intersection of Loring Avenue/Lafayette Street/West Street. PERIOD OF SERVICE Work on Task Order No.34 shall immediately commence upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed(NTP) via e-mail or letter from the City of Salem. • City of Salem 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan • Peer Review Services Task 34,1-Traffic and Intersection Immoyements Staff Role Hours Rick Azzalina/Gary Hebert Project Manager/Associate 2 Alan Cloutier Senior Engineer-Traffic 8 Brandon Ravno Engineer-Civil/Roodwav 6 Total Hours 16 Sub Task Fee: $2,138 Task 34.2-Drolnaae Staff Role Hours David Glenn Senior Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 4 Christopher Broyles Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 8 Total Hours 14 Sub Task Fee: $1,456 Task 34.3-Sewer Staff Role Hours Dan Kucharski Senior Engineer-Sewer 2 Paul Paone Engineer-Sewer 6 Total Hours 8 Sub Task Fee: $788 Task 34.4-Water Staff Role Hours Eric Lotz Senior Engineer-Water 2 • Ryan Stackaole Enaineer-Water 6 Total Hours 8 Sub Task Fee: $788 Task 34.5-Technical Memorandum Staff Role Hours Rick Azzalina Project Manager/Associate 1 David Glenn Senior Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 6 Total Hours 7 Sub Task Fee: $1,078 Task 34.6-Attendance at Meefinas Staff Role Hours David Glenn Senior Enaineer-Civil/Stormwater 4 Total Hours 4 Sub Task Fee: $616 I Total Fee: $6,864 Unless additional scope items are added by the City,the total Not-to-Exceed Budget for Task Order No.34 is$6,864,This Task Order No.34 includes 57 hours of engineering services at 0-37(B)Contract rates. i • TERMS AND CONDITIONS: . The terms and conditions of the Agreement referred to above shall apply to this Task Order No.34 except to the extent expressly modified herein. In the event of any such modification, the modification shall be set forth below and the Article of the Agreement to be modified shall be specifically referenced. TERMS OR PROVISIONS IN CONFLICT: if the provisions set forth in the Agreement are in conflict with the provisions set forth in this Task Order No.34, the provisions of this Task Order No. 34 shall govern. Acceptance of the terms of this Task Order No. 34 is acknowledged by the following authorized signatures of the parties to the Master Services Agreement 0-37(B); TEC CONSULTI G SERVICES, INC. CITY OF SALEM By. gy r CA I Authorized Signature Kimberley Driscoll Mayor Richard A.Azzalina,PE, Assoclate Authorized Officer (Print Name) Sarah Stanton Fi nce Direc or nn Goonin uncon, AICP • for Pla i�ommunity Development David H. Knowlton, PE. City Engineer ! 1j.p�. Whitney Haskell Purchasing Agent Appro L i as to form by: Elizabeth Rennard;Esq., City Solicitor TASK ORDER MADE AS OF: Date: Funding Source: Obiect: Oro. 1 CITY OF SALEM Purchase Order PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 120 Washington Street SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 Fiscal Year 2016 Page 1 of 1 TEL(978)745-9595 FAX(978)745-7461 SALES TAX EXEMPTION#E-046-001-413 hil Ttii3NVMBE1RTvNSTAPPEAR'ON ALLINVOICES, 1.� ' PACKKAGZS AND sHIPPI, PAPERS;" ad 200 Purchase 'L+ PLANNING DEPARTMENT Order# 3006571 -00 L, (978) 745-9595 EXT 5692 120 WASHINGTON STREET 3RD FL SALEM MA 01970 O a:r V' STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. S E 61 COMMERCIAL STREET, STE100 H PLANNING DEPARTMENT N', ROCHESTER NY 14614P' (978)745-9595 EXT 5692 D 120 WASHINGTON STREET 3RD FL {N SALEM MA 01970 O'' T R' `;VendorPhone NumtSer r' V,6L6 e ax Nurnberu, Requislt on Number _' C}etivery,Reference _ ` gnu" 7226 -Date Ord eeed�, Vendor Number„ aDat2.R ui{fid """Frei ht K4ethod/Terms 3 ms ,' v De S m as 04/22/2016 31455 04/21/2016 PLANNING Item#; L Qt UOM' ' tJn f pnea• as3Sl?nded Pr_.ice a`, 1 peer review of 331 Lafayette street-task order 34 1.0 EACH $6,864.000 $6,864.00 24573-5713 $6,864.00 • • CITY RECORDS INDICATE SUFFICIENT UNENCUMBERED FUNDS a' ARE PRESENT IN THE BUDGET ACCOUNT. APPROVES BY � Whitney C.Haskell IRA Purchasing Agent (NOT VALID WITHOUT CITY PURCHASING AGENT'S SIGNATURE) 6 864.00 FST �rau a Stantec Consulting Services Inc. • now 5 Burlington Woods Drive Suite 210, Burlington MA 01803-4511 Stantec May 3, 2016 File: 179410052 Attention: Ms. Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner Department of Planning & Community Development Salem City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street, 3rd floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Sheet/Loring Avenue Dear Amanda: Pursuant to the Department's request, Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) has reviewed the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan Submittal, a ,proposed Mixed Use Commercial Building in Salem. Materials received to date Include the following: • Site Plan Set (16 Sheets), dated February 25, 2016 and supporting documentation as prepared by the Morin-Cameron, Group, Inc. (MCG) • Stormwater Management Summary, dated February 25, 2016 and Environmental Impact Statement as prepared by MCG As identified in the agreement, our peer review is limited to the following categories: Traffic, Civil/Site, Drainage, Sewer and Water. Please find attached Stantecs's comments and recommendations for each of the aforementioned components of the project. In general, our peer review has raised several concerns and Issues, which will require a submission of additional plans and documentation. We recommend the applicant address the concerns and issues as identified herein. If there are any questions regarding our comments and recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact Richard Aaalina, P.E. Associate or myself at 1-800-835-8666. Very tru yours, Sta a Consulting Se ' s, Inc. By avid P. Glenn, E Senior Transportation Engineer Attachments • Design with community in mind Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Alan T. Cloutier, P.E. PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements We have completed our review of the proposed traffic circulation, as presented in the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & i l West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231,232, 233 and 234), Salem, Massachusetts' (Review Plans- 02/25/2016)for the subject project. Our comments are as follows: 1. The proposed design consists of one-way circulation with 90 degree parking. Angle parking is typically used when one way circulation is proposed to encourage the one-way circulation. If 90 degree parking is allowed, it is very likely that some drivers leaving the parking spots will drive the wrong way. Consider modifying the parking stalls to angled parking. This may result in fewer parking spaces. • 2. The proposed driveway aisles are 20 feet, 21.5 feet and 22 feet wide. Typically, 24 foot wide aisles are needed for 90 degree parking. Widths narrower than this are difficult from drivers to turn into parking spaces. Narrower widths can be used if angled parking is proposed. 3. Typical parking space depth is 18 feet. The proposed plan includes 19 foot deep parking spaces near walkways and 17 feet where the vehicle can overhang landscaped area. This is sufficient for most of the site, but can create conflicts at two locations. Near the proposed transformer pad on the eastern side of the site, vehicles in the two short spaces on each side of the transformer can block each other if the driver doesn't pull up far enough. This can be rectified by moving the four spaces westerly by a couple feet. Similarly the parking spaces in the northeast corner present a conflict if drivers don't pull up for enough. This can be rectified by moving the two spaces westerly by a couple feet. 4. The parking space immediately adjacent to the entrance is located very close to the property entrance. When a driver backs out of this spot, they will block the entrance and likely back over the sidewalk. Consider eliminating this spot, 5. The concrete cement sidewalk should extend across the driveways. 6. Deliveries areas are not shown. What types of delivery vehicles are expected? Can they, fit in a standard parking space? Proposed "Stop" /"Do Not Enter" Signs are located close to the West Street sidewalk. On sheet D-3, increase height of the Sign Post Detail to 7 feet of clearance from the ground to bottom of the sign. The landscaping plan show a planter and a tree on the southwestern corner of the property in the vicinity of the future traffic signal most arm. Please relocate/remove. • Design with community In mind ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Brandon T. Rayno, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject. Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements We have completed our review of the proposed site plans, as presented in the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234), Salem, Massachusetts" (Review Plans-02/25/2016) for the subject project. ' Our comments are as follows: 1. The proposed permanent sidewalk easement should provide a minimum of 3' clear around the pedestrian signal and push button mount at the corner of West Avenue and Lafayette Street to ensure a compliant path of travel within the City Right of Way. 2. Consider identifying existing trees to be removed on either the Existing Conditions Plan or Site Layout Plan, such as the existing tree located just behind the existing fence between 327 and 331 Lafayette Street. 3. Proposed driveways on Site Plan should Ge shown as cement concrete driveways consistent with the detail on D-2 Construction Details II. 4. Provide a detail for concrete curb as labeled as "CC" on the Site Layout Plan. Clarify differences between "CC" and "PCC (precast concrete curb). 5. The proposed 9' wide parking stall width does not provide adequate space for a driver/passenger to exit the vehicle adjacent to the dumpster pad and fence enclosure. 6. Per the 521 CMR: Architectural Access Board section 23.2.1 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a parking lot with 69 total spaces would require 3 accessible spaces with one being van accessible. 7. Replace the word "staked" with "stacked" in the curbing notes. 8. Provide a proposed gutter grade opposite the existing roadway grade of"32.42" on West Avenue to ensure positive drainage on West Avenue. 9. Proposed sidewalk grade "32.60" at the intersection of the West Avenue sidewalk and eastern walkway adjacent to the building would cause the sidewalk to slope back toward the building if a 6" reveal is used at the gutter. Consider revising the elevation to "32.70"to ensure positive drainage to the gutter. 10. Per the 521 CMR: Architectural Access Board section 21.6.1 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a wheelchair ramp curb cut shall have a level landing with a 4' length. Revise curb ramp details on D-2 Construction Details it accordingly. 11. Replace "??"with "1/4" on lip label in the Accessible Curb Ramp(ACR)Type 'B' detail on D-2 Construction Details il. 12. Consider using a plastic sleeve to form the rounded cap in the bollard detail rather than formed • concrete. Formed concrete have undesirable results during and after curing. Design with community In mind i ® Stantec May 2, 2016 David Glenn, P.E. Page 2 of 2 Reference: Task 34.1 -Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements 13. Locate and label the locations where bollard mounted signs are installed on the Site Layout Plan. Consider revising 5' min dimension to something higher as signs mounted that low may be hit by larger vehicles. • • Design with community in mind gd s:\1794\act1ve\179410052\task orders contract o37\tosk order 34 peer review 331 lafovette sheet site develapment\task order 34.3- a site plon review memo ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Christopher S. Broyles, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.2-Drainage The proposed stormwater management facilities as Illustrated on the site plan set were reviewed for conformance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Stormwater Management Standards and generally accepted engineering practice. We offer the following comments and recommendations regarding the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan for the DPCD's consideration. Stormwater Management The submitted Site Plan set provides a layout of the drainage system facilities improvements, including Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs). The Stormwater Management Summary; and supporting documentation, Includes regulatory compliance information and watershed area summaries. As stated in the letter, proposed BMP's include deep-sump hooded catch basins and subsurface recharge system. MassDEP Stormwater Standards We offer the following comments on the proposed stormwater management system, specifically for compliance with the ten performance standards as outlined in the MassDEP Stormwater Management Standards. A) Standard No.] requires no untreated stormwater discharges or erosion to wetland resource areas. MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this standard. We recommend the MCG provide this information to the Department for review. B) Standard No.2 requires peak flow attenuation (i.e. no increase In peak stormwater discharge rates). MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this standard. We recommend the MCG provide this Information to the Department for review. C) Standard No. 3 requires the loss of annual recharge to groundwater be minimized through the use of infiltration measures and annual recharge from post-development shall approximate the annual recharge from pre-development conditions. The Stormwater Management Summary documents the provided recharge volume by the Subsurface Recharge System exceeds the required recharge volume. However, we recommend documentation be provided to verify the Subsurface Recharge System will drain within 72 hours. D) Standard No. 4 requires the stormwater management system include a series of Best • Design with canmunity In mind r a ® Stantec May 2, 2016 David Glenn, P.E. • Page 2 of 3 Reference: Task 34.2-Drainage Managements Practices (BMPs) to demonstrate a total suspended solids (TSS) removal rate of at least 80 percent. The MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this requirement. Further, we recommend the required water quality volume be addressed by the applicant. Standard 4 requires the development and implementation of suitable practices for source control and pollution prevention. These measures must be identified in a long-term pollution prevention plan(LTPPP). The LTPPP may be prepared as a separate document or combined with the Operation and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9. The applicant has submitted the LTPPP under a separate cover and reviewed as part of this Standard. We recommend the applicant discuss storing materials and waste products inside or under cover and the spill prevention/response. E) Standard No. 5 requires the use of specific stormwater management BMP's from Land Uses With Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPLs). It is Stantec's opinion the project is not in an area of LUHPPL.We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. Fj Standard No. b Critical Areas. It is Stantec's opinion the project is not in a critical area. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. • G) Standard No. 7 Redevelopment Project. It is Stantec's opinion that the Site Plan qualifies as a redevelopment project. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. Hj Standard No. 8 requires an erosion and sedimentation control plan be developed and implemented to prevent impacts during construction and land disturbance activities. The submitted Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan include a discussion of erosion and sedimentation controls during Construction. We recommend the aforementioned erosion controls be identified on drawing C-4. Further, we recommend a schedule for construction and stormwater management activities be provided on the site plans. We recommend the submitted erosion control plan Include construction phasing, location of material stockpiles, equipment storage, and refueling areas. 1) Standard No. 9 requires all stormwater management systems have a long-term operation and maintenance plan to ensure the systems function as designed. The submitted Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan includes information regarding the Owner of the Stormwater Management System. The submitted LTPPP, as discussed under Standard 4, includes information about the maintenance tasks, public safety features, and estimated O&M costs. The Operation and Maintenance Plan also mentions the party responsible for the O&M of the BMP during construction. We recommend the applicant Identify the party or parties responsible for operation and maintenance of the Stormwater system after construction. • J) Standard No. 10 Prohibition of Illicit Discharges. We note that as part of the Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan, MCG has provided information relative to prevention of Illicit Design with community in mind gds:\1794\octive\179410052\lock orders contract o37\tock order 34 Deer revlew 331 lofovene street she tlavarnmwntllrxl,ndcr v.a.,,m,.o.,ew n,,.:,,.,.e,.,e...,, ® Stantec May 2, 2016 David Glenn, P.E. Page 3 of 3 • Reference: Task 34.2-Drainage discharges. We recommend the applicant provide a signed Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement verifying that no illicit discharges exist on the site. General Comments 1. The flow direction of the 12" VC Drain on West Avenue appears to be incorrect based in surveyed inverts. 2. The slope and flow direction should be identified on all proposed drainage pipes on the Grading, Drainage&Utility Plan, Drawing No. C-4 3. The Outlet Control Structure (OCS-1), as shown on Drawing No. C-4 Identifies the Invert B as 24.30, however, the detail on Drawing No. D-3, identifies it as 24.38. 4. The baffle elevation identified within the OCS-1, as shown on Drawing No. D-3 will interfere with the precast flat top as shown. 5. The OCS detail identifies a 4- orifice; however, the section identifies a baffle. 6. The Precast Typical Catch Basin should identify the hood as shown on the detail. 7. As noted in the Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan, deep sump catch basins, with a four (4) foot sump, are being proposed. The detail on Drawing No. D-3 identifies the sump as three (3)feet. MassDEP requires deep sump catch basin to have a four(4)sump. 8. The Utility Trench Detail on Drawing No. D-3 is for all utilities except Drainage utilities. The detail should be clarified, or a new detail created, to incorporate installation of a drainage • pipe. Design with community in mind ads:\1794\active\779410)52\task orders contract o37\task order 34 Deer review 331 lafavetfe street sire developmenMosk order 34.3-peer review dralnoae memo ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Daniel W, Kucharski, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Weston D. Silva, P.E. File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.3-Sewer INTRODUCTION We have completed our review of the proposed sewer system design, as presented In the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234), Salem, Massachusetts"(Review Plans-02/25/2016)for the subject project. Stantec adheres to the State of Massachusetts Environmental Code 310 CMR 15.00 Regulating Septic Systems, also known as Title V. The Title V code was used as the basis for our review comments. No calculations have been provided relative to the sizing of the grease trap or the anticipated sewerage flows. Therefore, an evaluation of these components of the project has not been conducted. Stantec recommends the sewer system flow and sizing calculations be reviewed prior • to completion of the design. Our comments on the plans are identified below. COMMENTS ON PLANS 1. The proposed grease trap, as located on Plan Sheet C-4 does not comply with the property line setback requirements set forth by 310 CMR 15.211. We suggest relocating the structure to meet these requirements. If the designer plans on leaving the structure at this location, a variance will be required and should be noted on the plans as such. 2. A 4" diameter sewer service is shown on Plan Sheet CA connecting to the 6"diameter inlet tee of the proposed grease trap. Please verify that the size of this service is correctly labeled. 3. The vertical position of the existing sewer main in West Street cannot be determined with the information provided. Stantec recommends adding the rim and invert elevations to the sewer manhole located within the intersection between Lafayette Street and West Avenue. 4. Stantec recommends adding sewer Invert elevations at all service exits from the building envelope. 5. Note 2, as shown within The Commercial Line Grease Trap Detail should be updated to reflect the subject project. • 6. The Typical Sewer Manhole detail shown on sheet D-1 makes reference to a "Drain Pipe". Stantec recommends specifying "Sewer" or removing this callout. Design with comnnmiry In mind ® Stantec May 2, 2016 David Glenn, P.E. Page 2 of 2 • Reference: Task 34.3-Sewer 7. Stantec recommends providing a water-tight connection(s)to the proposed manhole with a boot or other similar type connection. 8, Stantec recommends the Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 be modified to provide reference to the proposed PVC sewer. Currently, the detail only specifies details for the water and/or fire service. • Design with community In mind gal s:\1794\ocWe\179410052\losk ordws contract o37\task order 34 peer review 331 olayette street site dweloament\lack order 34.3-neer sewer review memo t ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Erica M. Lotz, P.E., ENV SP Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.4- Water We have completed our review of the proposed water system connection, as presented in the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234), Salem, Massachusetts" (Review Plans-02/25/2016)for the subject project. Our comments are as follows: 1. Plans indicate a proposed 4-Inch fire connection off of the existing 12-inch water main in West Avenue and a proposed copper service for domestic use. No size is indicated and a note indicates that the MEP Engineer will determine sizes prior to construction. Stantec recommends that the proponent complete a hydrant flow test at the project site to confirm that the existing water distribution system can supply the domestic and fire protection requirements for this • project without Improvements to the existing City infrastructure. 2. No domestic water shut off(curb stop and box) is shown on the plans. Stantec recommends the location be identified on the plans and a detail be provided. 3. The Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates a bury depth of 18-inches for the fire protection service line. Stantec recommends that this bury depth be increased to a minimum of 4 feet of cover to prevent freezing. 4. The Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates "all pipes shall be SDP35 PVC(see plan for sizes and types)." If the purpose of this detail is to cover all utility trenches, Stantec recommends that the reference to pipe material should be removed. Consider providing separate trench details for water and sewer. Design with community In mind Name of Project 1W 4- S K Peer Reviewer Task Order No. 3 Meeting Date Type of Meeting k Dnv;d Tenn MW dOl(Q Ircan4 planwe + G 5 d01u IGnnin uArDLt n NVOiCE Stantec 179410052 In Account With: Ms.Amanda Chiancola Invoice No.1065981 Staff Planner June 27,2016 Department of Planning 8 Community Development T.I.N.#11-2167170 120 Washington Street,Sd Floor Salem,Massachusetts 01970 RE: On-Call Professional Civil Engineer and Support Services Salem,Massachusetts - .. PERIOD: April 19.2016 throuah May 20.2016 - - TASK ORDER 34-Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street DIRECT Staff Services: HOURS RATE TOTAL ' Amlina,Rick Project Manager 2.0 $55.00 ' 110.00 - - Glenn,David Principal Engineer 19.0 $55.00 1,045.00 _ Lott,Erica Sr.Environmental Enc 1.5 $55.00 82.50 Cloutier,Alan T. Sr.Traffic Engineer 10.0 $52.32 523.20 - Silva,Wes Transportation Engr. 4.0 $43.27 173.08 - Broyles,Christopher Sr.Civil Engineer 8.0 $36.71 293.68 - Rayno,Brandon T. Sr Engineer 6.0 $36.00 _ 216.00 50.50 $2,443.46 • TOTAL GENERAL ON-CALL: $2,443.46 Subtotal Staff Services:. ` $2,443.46 Adjustment for overhead and profit: x2.8 Total Staff Services: $6,841.68 DIRECT Inscectlon/fla d Services HOURS RATE TOTAL 0.0 $0.00 0.00 - - Total InspectiontlReld Services: $0.00 , Enemies: Mileage:41.33 Miles®.54 per mile $22.32 Expenses: $22.32 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE: $6,864.00 ( � Very truly yours, �\ S TEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. Richard A.Amlina,P.E. _ Capped at$55/hour Associate Task Budget $6,864.00 - • Total Invoiced To Date $6,864.00 - Budget Remaining $0.00 Expense Report US1901469 • Name Cloutier,Alan T Approver (108309) Submit Date May 26,2016 Expense Dates May 19,2016 to May 26,2016 Lines Requiring Receipt 0 Cost Center 1794 Report Total 97.20 USD Purpose Site Visit Travel Reimbursement Amount 97.20 USD Reimb. Receipt Amount Expense Project Task Receipt Payment Method Date Expense Type Amount (USD) Mileage Merchant Name Location Justification Number Number Required Mileage 05119116 Direct-Vehicle(mileage) 32.40 32.40 60 Travel TolFromSalem 179410052 256.100 N USD MILES 1 51301201610:11:46 PM Page 1 of 1 FST 109 5 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. now 5 Burlington Woods Drive Suite 210.Burlington MA 01803-4511 Stantec May 13, 2016 File: 179410052 Attention: Ms. Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner Department of Planning &Community Development Salem City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street, 3rd floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Pian in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue Dear Amanda: Subsequent to our letter report of May 3, 2016 and pursuant to the Department of Planning & Community Development Department request, Stantec Consulting, Inc. (Stantec) has reviewed the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan Supplemental Submittal, a proposed Mixed Use Commercial Building in Salem. Materials received to date include the • following: • Site Plan Sheet Nos. C-3, C-4, D-1, D-2, D-3, revised May 4, 2016; Supplemental stormwater management documentation and written response letter, dated May 5, 2016 to Stantec's review letter of May 3, 2016 each as prepared by the Morin- Cameron, Group, Inc. (MCG) In general, the supplemental submittal adequately addresses our previous comments. We offer the following remaining comments regarding Traffic, Drainage, Sewer and Water for the Department's consideration. Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements Our previous Comment Nos. 1 thru 4 and 5 discussed the parking lot design of one-way circulation with 90-degree parking, driveway aisle width, parking space dimensions and location of several parking spaces in regards to traffic circulation, vehicle maneuvering In/out of parking spaces and passage ways to exit the vehicle. As noted in MCG's response letter, the plans were revised to provide a slight angle to the main entrance parking spaces entering from Lafayette Street. In addition, the parking aisle along the east side and parking spaces to the south were shifted to improve circulation and vehicle movements. A "small car parking sign" is provided at several space locations to deter larger vehicles. The proposed modifications will slightly improve the ability to pull into the proposed parking spaces and will slightly reduce the chances of vehicles driving the wrong way. Ideally, the parking would • be angled by a minimum of 30 degrees. As it is currently designed, drivers of larger vehicles(SUVs, Design with rwnmunIf in mind May 13, 2016 Ms. Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner Page 2 of 3 Reference: Task Order No.34 of MSA 0-37(B)-Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue minivans, etc.) may need to "straighten" their car after pulling into the parking space. If the proposed use were predominately retail, with high parking turnover, this configuration would lead to a poor operating parking lot. However, since the proposed use is predominately office, with lower parking tumover, these Issues are likely manageable. Similarly, since a high proportion of the parked vehicles are expected to be employees, the users are less likely to travel in the wrong direction. We recommend these latest plan modifications be further discussed by the applicant with the planning department. We continue to have concerns about the proposed parking space immediately adjacent to the entrance to the site. If this space is unable to be eliminated, we recommend restricting the use of this space to ensure that the least amount of drivers utilize this space. • The sign detail has been updated as requested. Task 34,2-Drainage In regards to Standard No. 8, we recommend a schedule for construction and stormwater management activities such as construction phasing, location of material stockpiles, equipment storage and refueling areas be provided on the plan. As noted in MCGs response letter, the applicant has agreed to provide the above referenced information and construction documents package to the planning department prior to construction. Task 34.3-Sewer Our previous Comment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 requested additional information regarding proposed grease trap, sewer service, utility crossings and invert elevations. As noted in MCG's response letter, the applicant has agreed to provide final utility design drawings and construction document package to the engineering division and/or other applicable departments prior to construction. Task 34.4- Water Our previous Comment No. 1 requested the proponent complete a hydrant flow test at the project site to confirm that the existing water distribution system can supply the domestic and fire protection requirements for this project without further improvements to the existing City infrastructure. • As noted in MCG's response letter, a hydrant flow test will be conducted by the project MEP 6eslgn with r.,rrm it riity in iitiric: May 13,2016 Ms.Amanda Chloncola, Staff Planner Page 3 of 3 Reference: Task Order No.34 of MSA 0-37(B)-Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction w th Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue during the building phase and final utility design drawings, including construction documents, will be submitted to the engineering division and/or other applicable departments prior to construction. If there are any questions or concerns regarding our comments herewith, please do not hesitate to contact Richard Azzalina, P.E. Associate or myself at 1-800-8358666. Very truly yours, Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. `lz� Richard A. Azzallna PE Associate I I • Design with cornmunily in minx" i I I I ra FST Stantec Consulting Services Inc. now 5 Burlington Woods Drive Suite 210,Burlington MA 01803-4511 Stantec April 14, 2016 File: 179410052 Attention: Ms.Amanda Chloncolo,Staff Planner Department of Planning&Community Development Salem City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street, 3rd floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue i Dear Amanda: FST, now Stantec, Is pleased to submit the attached Task Order No. 34 in connection with our Master Services Agreement (MSA) 0-37 (B) dated April 22 2013. Task Order No, 34 Includes the following: Peer review of the Lafayette Street/West Avenue Site Redevelopment Plan in coordination with our recently-bid signal/intersection modifications of Lafayette Street/Loring • Avenue For Task Order No. 34, we have developed our proposal based on our experiences working with the City of Salem(City)and our familiarity with the area. Our proposal identifies, by task, the scope of services and estimated fee anticipated to facilitate the completion of this task order assignment. j For Task Order No. 34, we propose a total Not to Exceed Fee of$6,864 as detailed in the attached Task Order No. 34 Agreement provided herewith for your review and approval. Please feel free to contact me at 781-221-1221 if you need any further information or scope changes to the attached Scope of Services.Stantec looks forward to assisting the City of Salem in undertaking this important South Salem assignment, Very truly yours, Stc C((��onsulting S vice , Inc. BkNIjeha 4\ &;Ql Richard A, Aaalina, PE Associate t i • Des6n»On cnmrnunflv.r,mirti TASK ORDER NO.34 TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 0-37(B) BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR MASTER SERVICES (NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE SERVICES) This is Task Order No.34 attached to and made part of the Master Services Agreement 0-37 (B) doted April 22 2013 between Fay.Spofford&Thorndike.LLC(FST),now Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., 5 Burlington Woods, Burlington, MA 01803 (ENGINEER), and the City of Salem (City), 93 Washington Street, Salem, MA 01970 (OWNER). This Task Order No. 34 describes the Scope of Services, Time,Schedule, Charges, and Payment Conditions for the Task Order known as: Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in conjunction with the Signal/Intersection Improvements at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue. Materials received to date include the following: • Site Plan Set (16 Sheets), doted February 25, 2016 and supporting documentation as prepared by The Morin-Cameron, Group, Inc,(MCG) • Stormwater Management Summary,dated February 25,2106 and Environmental Impact Statement as prepared by The Morin-Cameron, Group, Inc.(MCG) • PROJECT OBJECTIVE The purpose of Task Order No.34 Is to provide technical engineering support services to the City in its review of the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in conjunction with the signalized Intersection improvements of Lafayette Street(Route 114)at Loring Avenue(Route IA) and West Avenue as proposed by the City of Salem. Stontec previously reviewed preliminary information provided by the applicant identifying impacts to the intersection of Loring Avenue/ Lafayette Street/West Street in conjunction with the proposed improvements to the intersection. The preliminary submitted material did not include a traffic impact study to identify impacts of the project. SCOPE OF SERVICES Our peer review will consist of the following categories:traffic;Intersection Improvements,drainage and utilities. Task 34.1 -Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements We note the previously submitted preliminary material did not Include a traffic impact study to identify impacts of the project. Information supplied previously was contained In emails and analysis printouts. We recommend at a minimum,that the proponent submit a brief summary memorandum of the trip generation and the impacts of the project. Since we anticipate a brief memorandum, j our review will be limited to a cursory review of the findings. Stontec will review the site plan submission for potential civil/site impacts such as additional street widening, sidewalk improvements and/or geometric modifications to the public right-of-way from the site. We will also review the site pians to identify any site circulation issues,as well as reviewing the on-site signage and striping. • • Task 34.2-Drainage • Review of the storm drainage system layout as illustrated on the site plan and supporting documentation for conformance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Management Standards and generally accepted engineering practice. Task 34.3-Sewer • Evaluate the proposed sewer system for compliance with City standards and general engineering practice. This will include a review of the sewer service configuration and proposed construction details. • Review data and calculations used to establish wastewater flows generated by the development and determine consistency with Title V criteria and other applicable standards. It is assumed flow calculations will berovi p ded by the applicant.In addition to the capacity of on-site sewer facilities, the capacity of the mainline sewer to which the service connects will also be evaluated. The review will also consider any information the City may have on the available capacity of the municipal sewer system in the project area. Task 34.4-Wafer • Evaluate the proposed water system for compliance with City standards and general engineering practice. This will include a review of the water service configuration and proposed construction details. • Review data and calculations used to establish water system demand bythe development and determine consistency with Title V criteria and other applicable standards. It Is assumed • estimated water demand calculations will be provided by the applicant.The review will also consider any information the City may have on the available capacity of the municipal water system in the project area. Task 34.5-Prepare a Technical Memorandum with Findings and Recommendations • After reviewing materials submitted by the applicant, Stantec will prepare a technical memorandum summarizing findings and recommendations for the City of Salem. Task 34.6-Attend up to two meetings to discuss our technical memorandum. • At mutually agreeable times, Stantec will meet with the Department of Planning & Community Development to assist in evaluating the potential site plan Impacts in relation to the proposed improvements associated with the intersection of Loring Avenue/Lafayette Street/Vilest Street. PERIOD OF SERVICE Work on Task Order No.34 shall immediately commence upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed(NTP) Via e-mail or letter from the City of Salem. k 4 City of Salem 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan Peer Review Services Task 34 1-Traffic and Intersection Imorovements Staff Role Hours Rick Aaalina/Gary Hebert Project Manager/Assoclate 2 Alan Cloutier Senior Engineer-Traffic 8 Brandon Ravno Engineer-Civil/Roadway 6 Total Hours 16 Sub Task Fee: $2,138 Task 34.2-Drainage Staff Role Hours David Glenn Senior Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 4 Christopher Broyles Englnoer- Civil/Stormwater 8 Total Hours 14 Sub Task Fee: $1,456 Task 34.3-Sewer Staff Role Hours Dan Kucharski Senior Engineer-Sewer 2 Paul Paone Enaineer-Sewer 6 Total Hours 8 Sub Task Fee: $788 Task 34.4-Water • Staff Role Hours Eric Loh Senior Engineer-Water 2 Ryan Stackpole Enaineer-Water 6 Total Hours 8 Sub Task Fee: $788 Task 34.5-Technical Memorandum Staff Role Hours Rick Azzalina Project Manager/Associate 1 David Glenn Senior Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 6 Total Hours 7 Sub Task Fee: $1,078 Task 34.6-Attendance at Meetinas Staff Role Hours David Glenn Senior Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 4 a Total Hours 4 s Sub Task Fee: $616 Total Fee: $6,864 f s Unless additional scope items are added by the City,the total Not-to-Exceed Budget for Task Order No.34 is$6,864.This Task Order No.34 includes 57 hours of engineering services at 0-37(B)Contract rates. • n TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The terms and conditions of the Agreement referred to above shall apply to this Task Order No.34 except to the extent expressly modified herein. In the event of any such modification, the modification shall be set forth below and the Article of the Agreement to be modified shall be specifically referenced. TERMS OR PROVISIONS IN CONFLICT: If the provisions set forth in the Agreement are in conflict with the provisions set forth in this Task Order No. 34, the provisions of this Task Order No. 34 shall govern. Acceptance of the terms of this Task Order No. 34 is acknowledged by the following authorized signatures of the parties to the Master Services Agreement 0-37(B): rSTA�TEC CONSULTI G SERVICES, INC. CITY OF SALEM BY' By'/' Authorized Signature Kimberley Driscoll Mayor Richard A.Azzalina. PE. Associate Authorized Officer (Print Name) Sarah Stanton t recrec orin uncon, AICP a i_rin ng&Community Development David H. Knowlton, PE. City Engineer n/ 9- Whitney Haskell Purchasing Agent Approve as to form by: s Elizabeth Renard,Esq., i City Solicitor TASK ORDER MADE AS OF: Date: Funding Source: Object: Ora. r i FST Stantec Consulting Services Inc. now 5 Burlington Woods Drive Suite 210, Burlington MA 01803-4511 Stantec May 3, 2016 File: 179410052 Attention: Ms.Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner Department of Planning & Community Development Salem City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street, 3m floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Sheet/Loring Avenue Dear Amanda: Pursuant to the Department's request, Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) has reviewed the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan Submittal, a proposed Mixed Use Commercial Building in Salem. Materials received to date Include the following: • Site Plan Set (16 Sheets), dated February 25, 2016 and supporting documentation as prepared by the Morin-Cameron, Group, Inc. (MCG) • Stormwater Management Summary, dated February 25, 2016 and Environmental Impact Statement as prepared by MCG As identified in the agreement, our peer review is limited to the following categories: Traffic, Civil/Site, Drainage, Sewer and Water. Please find attached Stantecs's comments and recommendations for each of the aforementioned components of the project. In general, our peer review has raised several concerns and Issues, which will require a submission of additional plans and documentation. We recommend the applicant address the concerns and issues as .identified herein. If there are any questions regarding our comments and recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact Richard Aaalina, P.E. Associate or myself at 1-800-835-8666. Very tryyours, Sta e Consulting Services, Inc. /avidP. Glenn. E Senior Transportation Engineer .Attachments Design with community in mind Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Alan T. Cloutier, P.E. PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.1 - Trak Review and Intersection Improvements We have completed our review of the proposed traffic circulation, as presented in the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234), Salem, Massachusetts" (Review Plans- 02/25/2016)for the subject project. Our comments are as follows: 1. The proposed design consists of one-way circulation with 90 degree parking. Angle parking is typically used when one way circulation is proposed to encourage the one-way circulation. If 90 degree parking is allowed, it is very likely that some drivers leaving the parking spots will drive the wrong way. Consider modifying the parking stalls to angled parking. This may result in fewer parking spaces. 2. The proposed driveway aisles are 20 feet, 21.5 feet and 22 feet wide. Typically, 24 foot wide aisles are needed for 90 degree parking. Widths narrower than this are difficult from drivers to turn into parking spaces. Narrower widths can be used if angled parking is proposed. 3. Typical parking space depth is 18 feet. The proposed plan includes 19 foot deep parking spaces near walkways and 17 feet where the vehicle can overhang landscaped area. This is sufficient for most of the site, but can create conflicts at two locations. Near the proposed transformer pad on the eastern side of the site, vehicles in the two short spaces on each side of the transformer can block each other if the driver doesn't pull up far enough. This can be rectified by moving the four spaces westerly by a couple feet. Similarly the parking spaces in the northeast comer present a conflict if drivers don't pull up far enough. This can be rectified by moving the two spaces westerly by a couple feet. 4. The parking space immediately adjacent to the entrance is located very close to the property entrance. When a driver backs out of this spot, they will block the entrance and likely back over the sidewalk. Consider eliminating this spot. 5. The concrete cement sidewalk should extend across the driveways. 6. Deliveries areas are not shown. What types of delivery vehicles are expected? Can they fit in a standard parking space? Proposed "Stop" /"Do Not Enter"Signs are located close to the West Street sidewalk. On sheet D-3, increase height of the Sign Post Detail to 7 feet of clearance from the ground to bottom of the sign. The landscaping plan show a planter and a tree on the southwestern corner of the property in the vicinity of the future traffic signal mast arm. Please relocate/remove. Design with community In mind ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Brandon T. Rayno, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject. Task 34.1 - Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements We have completed our review of the proposed site plans, as presented in the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7& 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231, 232,233 and 234), Salem, Massachusetts" (Review Plans-02/25/2016) for the subject project. Our comments are as follows: 1. The proposed permanent sidewalk easement should provide a minimum of 3' clear around the pedestrian signal and push button mount at the corner of West Avenue and Lafayette Street to ensure a compliant path of travel within the City Right of Way. 2. Consider identifying existing trees to be removed on either the Existing Conditions Plan or Site Layout Plan, such as the existing tree located just behind the existing fence between 327 and 331 Lafayette Street. 3. Proposed driveways on Site Plan should l5e shown as cement concrete driveways consistent with the detail on D-2 Construction Details Il. 4. Provide a detail for concrete curb as labeled as "CC" on the Site Layout Plan. Clarify differences between "CC" and "PCC" (precast concrete curb). 5. The proposed 9' wide parking stall width does not provide adequate space for a driver/passenger to exit the vehicle adjacent to the dumpster pad and fence enclosure. 6. Per the 521 CMR: Architectural Access Board section 23.2.1 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a parking lot with 69 total spaces would require 3 accessible spaces with one being van accessible. 7. Replace the word "staked" with "stacked" in the curbing notes. 8. Provide a proposed gutter grade opposite the existing roadway grade of"32.42" on West Avenue to ensure positive drainage on West Avenue. 9. Proposed sidewalk grade "32.60" at the intersection of the West Avenue sidewalk and eastern walkway adjacent to the building would cause the sidewalk to slope back toward the building if a 6" reveal is used at the gutter. Consider revising the elevation to "32.70" to ensure positive drainage to the gutter. 10. Per the 521 CMR: Architectural Access Board section 21.6.1 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, a wheelchair ramp curb cut shall have a level landing with a 4' length. Revise curb ramp details on D-2 Construction Details 11 accordingly. 11. Replace '??" with '114"on lip label in the Accessible Curb Ramp(ACR)Type 'B' detail on D-2 Construction Details 11. 12. Consider using a plastic sleeve to form the rounded cap in the bollard detail rather than formed concrete. Formed concrete have undesirable results during and after curing. Design with canmunity In mind ® Stantec May 2, 2016 David Glenn, P.E. Page 2 of 2 Reference: Task 34.1 -Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements 13. Locate and label the locations where bollard mounted signs are installed on the Site Layout Plan. Consider revising 5' min dimension to something higher as signs mounted that low may be hit by larger vehicles. Design with comm luny In mind gd s:\1794\actfvakl79410052\ioskordemCOntrOCI o37Vwk order 34 peer review 331 lafwette street Oe development\task wdw 34.3bpeer site pion review memo ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Christopher S. Broyles, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.2-Drainage The proposed stormwater management facilities as Illustrated on the site plan set were reviewed for conformance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Stormwater Management Standards and generally accepted engineering practice. We offer the following comments and recommendations regarding the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan for the DPCD's consideration. Stormwater Manaaement The submitted Site Plan set provides a layout of the drainage system facilities improvements, Including Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs). The Stormwater Management Summary, and supporting documentation, Includes regulatory compliance information and watershed area summaries. As stated in the letter, proposed BMP's include deep-sump hooded catch basins and subsurface recharge system. MassDEP Stormwater Standards We offer the following.comments on the proposed stormwater management system, specifically for compliance with the ten performance standards as outlined in the MassDEP Stormwater Management Standards. A) Standard No.1 requires no untreated stormwater discharges or erosion to wetland resource areas. MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this standard. We recommend the MCG provide this information to the Department for review. B) Standard No.2 requires peak flow attenuation(i.e. no increase In peak stormwater discharge rates). MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this standard. We recommend the MCG provide this information to the Department for review. C) Standard No. 3 requires the loss of annual recharge to groundwater be minimized through the use of Infiltration measures and annual recharge from post-development shall approximate the annual recharge from pre-development conditions. The Stormwater Management Summary documents the provided recharge volume by the Subsurface Recharge System exceeds the required recharge volume. However, we recommend documentation be provided to "verify the Subsurface Recharge System will drain within 72 hours. D) Standard No. 4 requires the stormwater management system include a series of Best Design with community In mind ® Stantec May 2, 2016 David Glenn, P.E. Page 2 of 3 Reference: Task 34.2-Drainage Managements Practices (BMPs) to demonstrate a total suspended solids (TSS) removal rate of at least 80 percent. The MCG has not provided any documentation or statement regarding this requirement. Further, we recommend the required water quality volume be addressed by the applicant. Standard 4 requires the development and implementation of suitable practices for source control and pollution prevention. These measures must be identified in a long-term pollution prevention plan (LTPPP). The LTPPP may be prepared as a separate document or combined with the Operation and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9. The applicant has submitted the LTPPP under a separate cover and reviewed as part of this Standard. We recommend the applicant discuss storing materials and waste products inside or under cover and the spill prevention/response. E) Standard No. 5 requires the use of specific stormwater management BMP's from Land Uses With Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPLs). It is Stantec's opinion the project is not in an area of LUHPPL. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. F) Standard No. 6 Critical Areas. It is Stantec's opinion the project is not in a critical area. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. G) Standard No. 7 Redevelopment Project. It is Stantec's opinion that the Site Plan qualifies as a redevelopment project. We recommend the applicant provide a statement to the Department. H) Standard No. 8 requires an erosion and sedimentation control plan be developed and implemented to prevent impacts during construction and land disturbance activities. The submitted Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan include a discussion of erosion and sedimentation controls during Construction. We recommend the aforementioned eroslon controls be identified on drawing C-4. Further, we recommend a schedule for construction and stormwater management activities be provided on the site plans. We recommend the submitted erosion control plan Include construction phasing, location of material stockpiles, equipment storage, and refueling areas. 1) Standard No. 9 requires all stormwater management systems have a long-term operation and maintenance plan to ensure the systems function as designed. The submitted Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan includes information regarding the Owner of the Stormwater Management System. The submitted LTPPP, as discussed under Standard 4, includes information about the maintenance tasks, public safety features, and estimated O&M costs. The Operation and Maintenance Plan also mentions the party responsible for the O&M of the BMP during construction.We recommend the applicant identify the party or parties responsible for operation and maintenance of the Stormwater system after construction. J) Standard No. 10 Prohibition of Illicit Discharges. We note that as part of the Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan, MCG has provided information relative to prevention of Illicit Design with community in mind gds:\1794\octke\179410D52\1ask orders contract o-37\task order34 Deer review 331 lafavette sheetske rl.4nnmwnt\lr knrrfcr.U.. cr.a,iew ® Stantec May 2, 2014 David Glenn,P.E. Page 3 of 3 Reference: Task 34.2-Drainage discharges. We recommend the applicant provide a signed Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement verifying that no illicit discharges exist on the site. General Comments 1. The flow direction of the 12" VC Drain on West Avenue appears to be incorrect based In surveyed inverts. 2. The slope and flow direction should be identified on all proposed drainage pipes on the Grading, Drainage &Utility Plan, Drawing No. C-4 3. The Outlet Control Structure (OCS-1), as shown on Drawing No. C-4 identifies the Invert B as 24.30, however, the detail on Drawing No. D-3, identifies it as 24.38. 4. The baffle elevation identified within the OCS-1, as shown on Drawing No. D-3 will interfere with the precast flat top as shown. 5. The OCS detail Identifies a 4" orifice; however, the section identifies a baffle. 6. The Precast Typical Catch Basin should identify the hood as shown on the detail. 7. As noted in the Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan, deep sump catch basins, with a four (4) foot sump, are being proposed. The detail on Drawing No. D-3 identifies the sump as three (3)feet. MassDEP requires deep sump catch basin to.have a four(4)sump. 8. The Utility Trench Detail on Drawing No. D-3 is for all utilities except Drainage utilities. The detail should be clarified, or a new detail created, to incorporate installation of a drainage pipe. Design with community in mind ads:\1794\active\179410052\task orders mntiocl o-37\task order 34 peer review 331 lafortette street site developmenfltosk order 34.3-oaer review dralnoae memo 5 Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Daniel W. Kucharski, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Weston D. Silva, P.E. File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.3-Sewer INTRODUCTION We have completed our review of the proposed sewer system design, as presented In the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & i l West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234), Salem, Massachusetts" (Review Plans-02/25/2016)for the subject project. Stantec adheres to the State of Massachusetts Environmental Code 310 CMR 15.00 Regulating Septic Systems;also known as Title V. The Title V code was used as the basis for our review comments. No calculations have been provided relative to the sizing of the grease trap or the anticipated sewerage flows. Therefore, an evaluation of these components of the project has not been conducted. Stantec recommends the sewer system flow and sizing calculations be reviewed prior to completion of the design.. Our comments on the plans are identified below. COMMENTS ON PLANS 1. The proposed grease trap, as located on Plan Sheet C-4 does not comply with the property line setback requirements set forth by 310 CMR 15.211. We suggest relocating the structure to meet these requirements. If the designer plans on leaving the structure at this location, a variance will be required and should be noted on the plans as such. 2. A 4" diameter sewer service is shown on Plan Sheet C-4 connecting to the 6"diameter inlet tee of the proposed grease trap. Please verify that the size of this service is correctly labeled. 3 The vertical position of the existing sewer main in West Street cannot be determined with the Information provided. Stantec recommends adding the rim and invert elevations to the sewer manhole located within the intersection between Lafayette Street and West Avenue. 4. Stantec recommends adding sewer Invert elevations at all service exits from the building envelope. 5. Note 2, as shown within The Commercial Line Grease Trap Detail should be updated to reflect the subject project. 6. The Typical Sewer Manhole detail shown on sheet D-1 makes reference to a "Drain Pipe". Stantec recommends specifying "Sewer" or removing this callout. Design with com mu ty In mind ® Stantec May 2, 2016 David Glenn, P.E. Page 2 of 2 Reference: Task 34.3-Sewer 7. Stantec recommends providing a water-tight connection(s)to the proposed manhole with a boot or other similar type connection. 8. Stantec recommends the Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 be modified to provide reference to the proposed PVC sewer. Currently, the detail only specifies details for the water and/or fire service. Design with community in mind gds:\1794\octive\179410052\tosk orders contract o-37\1osk order 3E Deer review 331 lafoyelte streat site develoamenl\task order 34.3Deer sewer review memo ® Stantec Memorandum To: David Glenn, P.E. From: Erica M. Lotz, P.E., ENV SP Senior Transportation Engineer File: 179410052 Date: May 2, 2016 Subject: Task 34.4- Wafer We have completed our review of the proposed water system connection, as presented in the document titled "331 Lafayette Street, Mixed-Use Commercial Building, 331-335 Lafayette Street, 5-7 & 11 West Avenue (Assessor's Map 52, Lots 231, 232, 233 and 234), Salem. Massachusetts" (Review Pians-02/25/2016)for the subject project. Our comments are as follows: 1. Plans indicate a proposed 4-inch fire connection off of the existing 12-inch water main in West Avenue and a proposed copper service for domestic use. No size Is indicated and a note indicates that the MEP Engineer will determine sizes prior to construction. Stantec recommends that the proponent complete a hydrant flow test at the project site to confirm that the existing water distribution system can supply the domestic and fire protection requirements for this project without Improvements to the existing City Infrastructure. 2. No domestic water shut off(curb stop and box) is shown on the plans. Stantec recommends the location be identified on the plans and a detail be provided. 3. The Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates a bury depth of 18-inches for the fire protection service line. Stantec recommends that this bury depth be increased to a minimum of 4 feet of cover to prevent freezing. 4. The Utility Trench Detail shown on sheet D-3 indicates "all pipes shall be SDR35 PVC(see plan for sizes and types)." If the purpose of this detail is to cover all utility trenches, Stantec recommends that the reference to pipe material should be removed. Consider providing separate trench details for water and sewer. Dealgn with cmnnxWty In mind FST • 6"�� Stantec Consulting Services Inc. now 5 Burlington WoodsDrive Suite 210,Burlington MA 01803-4511 Stantec April 14, 2016 File: 179410052 Attention: Ms.Amanda Chioncola,Staff Planner Department of Planning &Community Development Salem City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street, 3rd floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Task Order No. 34 of MSA 0-37 (B) - Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in Conjunction with Signal/Intersection Modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue Dear Amanda: FST, now Stantec, is pleased to submit the attached Task Order No. 34 in connection with our Master Services Agreement (MSA) 0-37 (B) dated April 22, 2013. Task Order No, 34 includes the following: Peer review of the Lafayette Street/West Avenue Site Redevelopment Plan in coordination with our recently-bid signal/intersection modifications at Lafayette Street/Loring • Avenue For Task Order No. 34, we have developed our proposal based on our experiences working with the City of Salem(City)and our familiarity with the area. Our proposal identifies, by task, the scope of services and estimated fee anticipated to facilitate the compleflon of this task order assignment. For Task Order No. 34, we propose a total Not to Exceed Fee of$6,864 as detailed in the attached Task Order No. 34 Agreement provided herewith for your review and approval. Please feel free to contact me at 781-221-1221 if you need any further information or scope changes to the attached Scope of Services.Stantec looks forward to assisting the City of Salem in undertaking this important South Salem assignment. i Very truly yours, StBc Consult �in S ivice , Inc. B O ta I [ Richard A. Aaalina, PE Associate • Design.with community 1wmind. • TASK ORDER NO.34 TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 0-37 (B) BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR MASTER SERVICES (NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE SERVICES) This Is Task Order No. 34 attached to and made part of the Master Services Agreement 0-37 (B) dated April 22, 2013 between Fay,Spofford&Thorndike, LLC(FST), now Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., 5 Burlington Woods, Burlington, MA 01803 (ENGINEER), and the City of Salem (City), 93 Washington Street, Salem, MA 01970 (OWNER). This Task Order No. 34 describes the Scope of Services, Time Schedule, Charges, and Payment Conditions for the Task Order known as: Peer Review of 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in conjunction with the Signal/Intersection Improvements at Lafayette Street/Loring Avenue. Materials received to date Include the following: • Site Plan Set (16 Sheets), dated February 25, 2016 and supporting documentation as prepared by The Morin-Cameron, Group, Inc. (MCG) • Stormwater Management Summary,dated February 25,2106 and Environmental Impact Statement as prepared by The Morin-Cameron, Group, Inc. (MCG) PROJECT OBJECTIVE The purpose of Task Order No.34 is to provide technical engineering support services to the City in its review of the 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan in conjunction with the signalized Intersection improvements of Lafayette Street(Route 114)at Loring Avenue (Route IA) and West Avenue as proposed by the City of Salem. Stantec previously reviewed preliminary information provided by the applicant identifying impacts to the intersection of Loring Avenue/ Lafayette Street/ West Street in conjunction with the proposed improvements to the intersection. The preliminary submitted material did not include a traffic impact study to identify Impacts of the project. SCOPE OF SERVICES Our peer review will consist of the following categories:traffic; intersection improvements,drainage and utilities. i Task 34.1 -Traffic Review and Intersection Improvements We note the previously submitted preliminary material did not include a traffic impact study to identify impacts of the project. Information supplied previously was contained in emails and analysis printouts. We recommend at a minimum,that the proponent submit a brief summary memorandum j of the trip generation and the impacts of the project. Since we anticipate a brief memorandum, our review will be limited to a cursory review of the findings. Stantec will review the site plan submission for potential civil/site impacts such as additional street widening,sidewalk improvements and/or geometric modifications to the public right-of-way from the site. We will also review the site plans to identify any site circulation issues, as well as reviewing • the on-site signage and striping. • Task 34.2- Drainage • Review of the storm drainage system layout as illustrated on the site plan and supporting documentation for conformance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Management Standards and generally accepted engineering practice. Task 34.3-Sewer • Evaluate the proposed sewer system for compliance with City standards and general engineering practice. This will include a review of the sewer service configuration and proposed construction details. • Review data and calculations used to establish wastewater flows generated by the development and determine consistency with Title V criteria and other applicable standards. It is assumed flow calculations will be provided by the applicant. In addition to the capacity of on-site sewer facilities, the capacity of the mainline sewer to which the service connects will also be evaluated. The review will also consider any information the City may have on the available capacity of the municipal sewer system in the project area. Task 34.4-Water • Evaluate the proposed water system for compliance with City standards and general engineering practice. This will include a review of the water service configuration and proposed construction details. • Review data and calculations used to establish water system demand by the development and determine consistency with Title V criteria and other applicable standards. It is assumed estimated water demand calculations will be provided by the applicant.The review will also • consider any information the City may have on the available capacity of the municipal water system in the project area. Task 34.5- Prepare a Technical Memorandum with Findings and Recommendations • After reviewing materials submitted by the applicant, Stantec will prepare a technical memorandum summarizing findings and recommendations for the City of Salem. Task 34.6- Attend up to two meetings to discuss our technical memorandum. • At mutually agreeable times, Stantec will meet with the Department of Planning & Community Development to assist in evaluating the potential site plan impacts in relation to the proposed improvements associated with the intersection of Loring Avenue/ Lafayette Street/West Street. PERIOD OF SERVICE Work on Task Order No.34 shall immediately commence upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed(NTP) via e-mail or letter from the City of Salem. i City of Salem 331 Lafayette Street Mixed Use Commercial Building Site Plan Peer Review Services Task 34 1-Traffic and Intersection Improvements Staff Role Hours Rick Azzalina/Gary Hebert Project Manager/Associate 2 Alan Cloutier Senior Engineer-Traffic 8 Brandon Ravno Enaineer- ivil/Roadway 6 Total Hours 16 Sub Task Fee: $2,138 Task 34.2- Drainaae Staff Role Hours David Glenn Senior Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 4 Christopher Broyles Engineer-Civil/Stormwater 8 Total Hours 14 Sub Task Fee: $1,456 Task 34.3-Sewe Staff Role Hours Dan Kucharski Senior Engineer-Sewer 2 Paul Paone Engineer-Sewer 6 Total Hours 8 Sub Task Fee: $788 Task 34.4-Water Staff Role Hours • Eric Lotz Senior Engineer-Water 2 Ryan Stackpole Engineer-Water 6 Total Hours 8 Sub Task Fee: $788 Task 34.5-Technical Memorandum Staff Role Hours Rick Azzalina Project Manager/Associate 1 David Glenn Senior Enalneer- Civii/Stormwater 6 Total Hours 7 Sub Task Fee: $1,078 Task 34.6-Attendance at Meefinas Staff Role Hours David Glenn Senior Enaineer-Civii/Stormwater 4 Total Hours 4 Sub Task Fee: $616 Total Fee: $6,864 y Unless additional scope items are added by the City,the total Not-to-Exceed Budget for Task Order No.34 is$6,864.This Task Order No.34 includes 57 hours of engineering services at 0-37(B)Contract rates. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: • The terms and condltions of the Agreement referred to above shall apply to this Task Order No. 34 except to the extent expressly modified herein. In the event of any such modification, the modification shall be set forth below and the Article of the Agreement to be modified shall be specifically referenced. TERMS OR PROVISIONS IN CONFLICT: If the provisions set forth in the Agreement are in conflict with the provisions set forth in this Task Order No. 34, the provisions of this Task Order No. 34 shall govern. Acceptance of the terms of this Task Order No. 34 is acknowledged by the following authorized signatures of the parties to the Master Services Agreement 0-37(B): rffAl�TEC CONSULTI G SERVICES, INC. CITY OF SALEM BY: By: \ Authorized SignatureKim erley Drisc I Mayor Richard A.Azzolina, PE, Associate Authorized Officer (Print Name) Sarah Stanton Flipcirice Directo AGoonln ncan, AICP r Plannin_g &Community Development David H. Knowlton, PES. City Engineer '-w -� Whitney Haskell Purchasing Agent j i Approve as to by: €izabe4h Rennor'f Esq.,____ City Solicitor TASK ORDER MADE AS OF: Date: Funding Source: Object: Ora. •