Loading...
3 HARMONY GROVE RD, 60,64 GROVE ST - PLANNING x m y " w 3f NarMe6y Ctiovc : I . CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM FILE It APPLICATION CITY CLERK.SALEM, MASS. SITE PLAN REVIEW Location of Property: 3 Harmony Grove Rd. & Applicant:MRM Project Management, LLC 60-64 Grove Street Address/POBox:po Box 388 Proposed Date of Hearing: Date of Submittal: City, State,Zip Code: Beverly, MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 I. Project Description: a. Zoning district: b. Square footage of parcel: 296,660 sf c. Square footage of structure(s):Residential: 135,J68 sf; Commercial: d. Square footage of footprint:_Resi t t R� cnmmarriate 6.886464f 17,000 sf s e. No.of dwelling units(if applicable): 141 II. Additional Information: Information required includes this application and the following additional information.File one copy of all information with City Clerk and fifteen (15)copies with the Planning Board (all copies must be stamped by City Clerk). a. A Site Plan at a scale of 1"=40', (or as established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in Section ITIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: 1. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction. 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas,loading areas,walkways, and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways. 4. Location and type of external lighting. 5. Location,type, dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening. 6. Location and dimensions of utilities, gas,telephone,electrical communication,water,drainage,sewer and other waste disposal. 7. Location of snow removal areas. 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds,brooks, streams, wetlands, and marshes. 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site,with two-foot contours. 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of buildings to be erected tural style ' ns showing ty including elevatto g architec b. A brief narrative,as requested by the Planning Board addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: 1. Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow, circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting 5. Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance lo. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area c. An Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. III. Procedure: The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion,investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report.The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws.The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor in title to alleviate the effects of same. ahtepplicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable) /a-/6 Date Date FEE PAID: CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1011 DEC 22 P 2 54 CITY OF SALEM FILE # APPLICATION CITY CLERK,SALEM, MASS. WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS SPECIAL PERMIT Applicant: MRM Project Management, LLC Address: _ P.O. Box 388, Beverly MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 Owner: Same as Annlicant Location of Property:60-64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road _ Project Description: . Mixed-use-, Residential & Commercial I. It has been determined by the Building Inspector that the above property lies in the following area(s): A. Wetlands District: Wetlands(v)Buffer Zone() B. Flood Hazard District: Zone A 0 ZoneA3 ()Zone V3 () 11. Information required includes this application and the following additional information: (File one (1)copy of everything with the City Clerk and fifteen(15)copies with the Planning Board, all copies must be stamped by the City Clerk) A. A site plan at a scale of 1"equals 20' prepared by a registered land surveyor or registered professional engineer and showing at least the following: 1. Lot lines within which the development is proposed and the tie-in to the nearest road intersection. 2. The location,boundaries, and dimensions of each lot in question. 3. Two-foot(2') contours of the existing and proposed land surface. 4. Location of existing and proposed structures,water-courses, drainage and drainage easements, means of access, utilities, and sewer disposal facilities including leaching fields, if any. Proposed elevations should be noted. 5. Boundaries of all districts, areas and zones as noted in Section I. B. In the Wetlands District, a determination by a qualified engineer of the seasonal high water table,performed during the last two weeks of March or the first three weeks of April. A minimum of two percolation tests for each leaching area shall be performed. C. In cases of flood-proofing or pile construction, certification by a registered professional engineer or architect as to the elevation of flood-proofing measures and as to compliance with the applicable sections of the Massachusetts State Building Code concerned with flood depths,pressures velocities, impact and uplift forces, and other factors associated with the base flood. Where specific methods or techniques have been previously certified,the Planning Board may waive this requirement. D.A list of Federal, State, and other local permits required by the applicant. E. Descriptions relative to all conditions applicable in Section III below. III. Conditions(Complete those sections indicated(x)by the Building Inspector) In the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts no structure or building,including pipes and wells, shall be erected, constructed, substantially improved,enlarged, or otherwise created or moved;no area shall be paved;no earth or other material shall be stored, dumped,used as fill, excavated, or transferred; and no sediment shall be caused to be discharged from or onto a wetland,unless all the following conditions are found to exist as part of the granting of a Special Permit by the Planning Board(Use additional pages if necessary) A. All Districts: (� 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying District in which the land is located. Yes xxx No (y) 2. There is adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site, and in relation to adjacent streets and property,particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lot(s)caused by either overspill from water bodies or high runoff. Yes, Sea attached sheet. (3) 3. Utilities, including gas, electricity, fuel,water, and sewage disposal, shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, short-circuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. (Provide details) Yes, See attached sheet. ( 4. The cumulative effect of the proposed development or use,when combined with all other existing and anticipated development and uses will not obstruct or divert flood flow; substantially reduce natural flood-water storage capacity in the local drainage area; destroy valuable habitat for wildlife including fisheries or shellfisheries; adversely affect groundwater resources or increase storm water run-off velocity so that water levels on other land are substantially raised or the danger from flooding increased. Yes, See attached sheet. B. Wetlands District: ( 1. The proposed development or use shall not include the storage of salt,chemicals, petroleum products or other contaminating substances or discharge of any polluting liquids or materials into streams,brooks or wetlands. (The polluting effects of substances on the Wetlands are to be gauged by the"Rules and Regulations for the Establishment of Minimum Water Quality Standards and for the Protection of the Quality and Value of Water Resources"of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.) Yes. No chemicals or salt storage is proposed Buildings will be heated by natural gas. Stormwater discharges will comply with DEP Stormwater Management Standards. (t)2. The floor level of areas to be occupied by human beings as living or work space shall be four(4) feet or more above the seasonal high water table. Yes. See project Site Plan First floor is morp than Vnboyp tha adiacent grade at the rear of each building 3. If the basement floor level is below the seasonal high water table and affords the possibility of human occupancy at some future date, although not originally intended, adequate perimeter drainage and foundation shall be installed to withstand the effect of pressure and seepage. Furnace and utilities are to be protected from the effects of leaching. (Provide details) ()Applies a Does not Apply 4. If the lot is to be served by an on lot septic system,the leaching area designed for use, as well as a reserved area for future expansion or total future use, shall be plotted with dimensions on the site plan, and the leaching areas shall not be constructed where the seasonal high water table is less than 4 feet below the bottom of the leaching areas. () Applies(See site plan) 0 Does not apply C. Flood Hazard District(all zones > 1. The floor of the basement, or if none, the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for residential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level. The basement floors for the proposed residential buildings are all above4tbp Inn—year flood level (elevation 10.8) 2. The floor of the basement, or if none, the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for nonresidential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level or the structures shall be flood-proofed to that level in compliance with the applicable requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Flood-proofing measures shall insure that the structure is watertight and that structural components have the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. The approximately 100-year commercial building (no. 60 Grove Street) has a basement that is below the 100-year flood level. Holes in the foundation walls allow flood waters to enter and receed The proposed building improvements will bring the building into compliance with current codes D. Flood Hazard District. Coastal High Hazard Area(Zone V3): () 1. New structures or substantial improvements shall be located landward of the reach of Mean High Tide. ()2.New structures or substantial improvements shall be elevated on adequately anchored pilings or columns, and securely anchored to such pilings or columns so that the lowest portion of the structural members of the lowest floor(excluding the pilings or columns) is elevated to or above the 100 year flood level. Space below the lowest floor shall be free of fixed obstruction. (Provide details) () 3. The support of new structures or substantial improvements shall not be, in whole or in part, by the use of fill. (Provide details) IV. Procedure The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health, Conservation Commission and Fire Prevention Officer who may,at their discretion,investigate the application and report in writing their recommendations to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health, Conservation Commission and Fire Prevention Officer or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report.The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports,in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General laws.The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the wetland or flood hazard conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor in title to a to the effec of s ignZAU ature o Applicant gignatfireof OiEff(affached consent letter is also acceptable) /40)--1�I/ / �-1- -/ Date Date FEE PAID: All Districts III.A.2—In the event of an extreme storm event(100-year storm)the adjacent North River could overflow its banks and flow onto low-lying portions of the subject properties. Likewise,during such flooding a portion of the proposed driveway from Harmony Grove Road could be flooded with up to a foot of water. The proposed residential buildings and associated parking areas are located above the 100-year flood elevation. Alternative egress above the 100-year flood elevation is available for vehicles and pedestrians via Grove Street. The parking lot for the commercial building at 60 Grove Street is also susceptible to flooding. This may require that the building close down during extreme storm events. The habitable working space within the building is all located above the base flood elevation. The flooding conditions on the existing 60 Grove Street commercial property are pre-existing conditions and will not be affected by the proposed redevelopment. III.A.3—Existing utilities for the 60 Grove Street commercial building will be reused. New utilities are proposed for the residential buildings at 64 Grove Street. All new utilities will be located above or outside the flood zone except for a few driveway lights which will require underground electrical wires below the flood elevation. Proper construction techniques(i.e.sealed conduits or submersible cables) will be used to limit potential flood damage. III.A.4—The proposed project will not create new obstructions to or divert flood flows. Removing buildings along the edge of the canal will increase flood-water conveyance and storage capacity. No activities are proposed with the North River canal,so the project will have no effect on fisheries or shellfisheries. The site currently does not provide valuable wildlife habitat due to the industrial uses and buildings which cover the property. Therefore,the proposed site redevelopment work is not expected to significantly affect valuable wildlife habitat. A stormwater management system,designed in compliance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Standards,will be installed to provide adequate groundwater recharge. Post- development stormwater runoff will be similar to existing flow rates. Because this site is located adjacent to the tidal North River canal, is a low-lying parcel only slightly above the 100-year flood elevation,and will be served by a modern stormwater management system,stormwater runoff from the site will not affect water levels on other properties. CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS SPECIAL PERMIT Applicant: MRM Project Management, LLC Address: P.O. Box 388, Beverly MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 Owner:_ Same as Applicant Location of Property:60-64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Project Description: _Mix pd-use: Residential &Commercial I. It has been determined by the Building Inspector that the above property lies in the following area(s): A. Wetlands District: Wetlands W Buffer Zone() B. Flood Hazard District: Zone A ip ZoneA3 ()Zone V3 () II. Information required includes this application and the following additional information: (File one (1)copy of everything with the City Clerk and fifteen(15) copies with the Planning Board, all copies must be stamped by the City Clerk) A. A site plan at a scale of 1"equals 20' prepared by a registered land surveyor or registered professional engineer and showing at least the following: 1. Lot lines within which the development is proposed and the tie-in to the nearest road intersection. 2. The location, boundaries, and dimensions of each lot in question. 3. Two-foot(2')contours of the existing and proposed land surface. 4. Location of existing and proposed structures, water-courses, drainage and drainage easements, means of access, utilities, and sewer disposal facilities including leaching fields, if any. Proposed elevations should be noted. 5. Boundaries of all districts, areas and zones as noted in Section 1. B. In the Wetlands District, a determination by a qualified engineer of the seasonal high water table,performed during the last two weeks of March or the first three weeks of April. A minimum of two percolation tests for each leaching area shall be performed. C. In cases of flood-proofing or pile construction, certification by a registered professional engineer or architect as to the elevation of flood-proofing measures and as to compliance with the applicable sections of the Massachusetts State Building Code concerned with flood depths,pressures velocities, impact and uplift forces, and other factors associated with the base flood. Where specific methods or techniques have been previously certified, the Planning Board may waive this requirement. D.A list of Federal, State, and other local permits required by the applicant. E. Descriptions relative to all conditions applicable in Section III below. III. Conditions(Complete those sections indicated(x)by the Building Inspector) In the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts no structure or building,including pipes and wells, shall be erected, constructed, substantially improved, enlarged,or otherwise created or moved; no area shall be paved; no earth or other material shall be stored,dumped, used as fill,excavated,or transferred; and no sediment shall be caused to be discharged from or onto a wetland,unless all the following conditions are found to exist as part of the granting of a Special Permit by the Planning Board(Use additional pages if necessary) A. All Districts: (x) 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying District in which the land is located. Yes XXX No (Y) 2. There is adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site, and in relation to adjacent streets and property,particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s)or adjacent lot(s)caused by either overspill from water bodies or high runoff. Yes, See attached sheet. (io 3. Utilities, including gas, electricity, fuel, water, and sewage disposal,shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, short-circuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. (Provide details) Yes, See attached sheet. (14. The cumulative effect of the proposed development or use, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development and uses will not obstruct or divert flood flow; substantially reduce natural flood-water storage capacity in the local drainage area; destroy valuable habitat for wildlife including fisheries or shellfisheries; adversely affect groundwater resources or increase storm water run-off velocity so that water levels on other land are substantially raised or the danger from flooding increased. Yes, See attached sheet. B. Wetlands District: ( 1. The proposed development or use shall not include the storage of salt, chemicals, petroleum products or other contaminating substances or discharge of any polluting liquids or materials into streams,brooks or wetlands. (The polluting effects of substances on the Wetlands are to be gauged by the"Rules and Regulations for the Establishment of Minimum Water Quality Standards and for the Protection of the Quality and Value of Water Resources"of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.) Yes. No chemicals or salt storage is proposed. Buildings will b heated by natural gas. Stormwater discharges will comply with DEP Stormwater Management Standards. (c)2. The floor level of areas to be occupied by human beings as living or work space shall be four(4) feet or more above the seasonal high water table. Yes. See project Site Plan First floor ig more than 4'nhnvp rhe adjacent grade at the rear of each building. 0 3. If the basement floor level is below the seasonal high water table and affords the possibility of human occupancy at some future date, although not originally intended, adequate perimeter drainage and foundation shall be installed to withstand the effect of pressure and seepage. Furnace and utilities are to be protected from the effects of leaching. (Provide details) ()Applies a Does not Apply (� 4. If the lot is to be served by an on lot septic system,the leaching area designed for use, as well as a reserved area for future expansion or total future use, shall be plotted with dimensions on the site plan, and the leaching areas shall not be constructed where the seasonal high water table is less than 4 feet below the bottom of the leaching areas. ()Applies (See site plan) 0 Does not apply C. Flood Hazard District(all zones): X3 1. The floor of the basement, or if none, the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for residential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level. The basement floors for the proposed residential buildings are all above' the 100-year flood level (elevation 10.8) 2. The floor of the basement, or if none, the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for nonresidential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level or the structures shall be flood-proofed to that level in compliance with the applicable requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Flood-proofing measures shall insure that the structure is watertight and that structural components have the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. The approximately 100—year commercial building (no. 60 Grove Street) has a basement that is below the 100—year flood level. Holes in the foundation walls allow flood waters to enter and receed he proposed building improvements will bring the building into compliance with current code: D. Flood Hazard District Coastal High Hazard Area(Zone V3): () 1. New structures or substantial improvements shall be located landward of the reach of Mean High Tide. () 2. New structures or substantial improvements shall be elevated on adequately anchored pilings or columns, and securely anchored to such pilings or columns so that the lowest portion of the structural members of the lowest floor(excluding the pilings or columns) is elevated to or above the 100 year flood level. Space below the lowest floor shall be free of fixed obstruction. (Provide details) () 3. The support of new structures or substantial improvements shall not be,in whole or in part, by the use of fill. (Provide details) IV. Procedure plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of BuildingsThe Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application, ,City Engineer,Board of Health Conservation Commission and Fire Prevention Officer who may,at thew discretion,investigate the application and report in writing their recommendations to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Conservation Commission and Fire Prevention Officer or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report.The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws.The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the wetland or flood hazard conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the etitioner or his successor in title to"ate to the effec f sa do ignature o Applicant Signature of wner(attached consent letter is also acceptable) Date Date FEE PAID: All Districts III.A.2—In the event of an extreme storm event(100-year storm)the adjacent North River could overflow its banks and flow onto low-lying portions of the subject properties. Likewise,during such flooding a portion of the proposed driveway from Harmony Grove Road could be flooded with up to a foot of water. The proposed residential buildings and associated parking areas are located above the 100-year flood elevation. Alternative egress above the 100-year flood elevation is available for vehicles and pedestrians via Grove Street. The parking lot for the commercial building at 60 Grove Street is also susceptible to flooding. This may require that the building close down during extreme storm events. The habitable working space within the building is all located above the base flood elevation. The flooding conditions on the existing 60 Grove Street commercial property are pre-existing conditions and will not be affected by the proposed redevelopment. III.A.3—Existing utilities for the 60 Grove Street commercial building will be reused. New utilities are proposed for the residential buildings at 64 Grove Street. All new utilities will be located above or outside the flood zone except for a few driveway lights which will require underground electrical wires below the flood elevation. Proper construction techniques(i.e.sealed conduits or submersible cables) will be used to limit potential flood damage. III.A.4—The proposed project will not create new obstructions to or divert flood flows. Removing buildings along the edge of the canal will increase flood-water conveyance and storage capacity. No activities are proposed with the North River canal, so the project will have no effect on fisheries or shellfisheries. The site currently does not provide valuable wildlife habitat due to the industrial uses and buildings which cover the property. Therefore,the proposed site redevelopment work is not expected to significantly affect valuable wildlife habitat. A stormwater management system,designed in compliance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Standards,will be installed to provide adequate groundwater recharge. Post- development stormwater runoff will be similar to existing flow rates. Because this site is located adjacent to the tidal North River canal, is a low-lying parcel only slightly above the 100-year flood elevation,and will be served by a modern stormwater management system,stormwater runoff from the site will not affect water levels on other properties. I ' CITY OF SALEM ' PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERMIT Location of Property: 3 Harmony Grove Road& 60-64 Grove Street Applicant: MRM Project Management Proposed Date of Hearing: Address/PO Box: PO Box 388 Date of Submittal: City, State, Zip Code: Beverly MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 I. Project Description: a. Zoning district: BPD b. Square footage of parcel: 296.660 sf c. Square footage of structure(s): Residential: 135,768 gsP Commercial: 17,000 gsf d. Square footage of footprint: Residential: 11,480 sf• Commercial: 6.864 sf e. No. of dwelling units(if applicable): 141 II. Additionallnforrngion: Information required includes this application and the following additional information. File one copy the application with City Clerk and fifteen (15) copies of the application and all accompanying materials with the Planning Board (all copies must be stamped by City Clerk). a. A Site Plan at a scale of 1"=40', (or as established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in Section IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: 1. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction. 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas,walkways, and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways. 4. Location and type of external lighting. 5. Location,type, dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening. 6. Location and dimensions of utilities,gas,telephone,electrical communication, water, drainage, sewer and other waste disposal. 7. Location of snow removal areas. 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds, brooks, streams, wetlands, and marshes. W, q t � ti 9• Existing and proposed topography of f ' contours. Y the site ' wttlt two 10. Concept drawings and elevations of b A briefn Including elevations showingbuildings to be erected narrative as requested architectural style. requirements and other a by the Planting Board ad t y 1• Building appropriate concerns in the following de these plan P site Parking rving defined categories: g and loading y 3 Traffic circ flow, elation and traffic im 4• Extern al lighting Pact 5• Landscaping and screening 6• Utilities 7. Snow removal 8• Natural features 9• Topography and theirprotection and enhancement 10. Compatibility of alchitectur c' An Environmental with sutrotutding area Impact Statement in Subdivision Regulations. accordance with Appendix III. Procedure A of the Salem The Planntr�i ' application g Board shall, within Of Health, Plans and all o n 7 days after the film he applicat o e Pref th vention Officer and Conssubmitted e rmation oothe Inspector is ton, transmit one co not t n and re writing t tvation Commissio ofBuildings, Ci PYof neer,Board shall eke final action on g heir recommendatio n who may,at their City Engineer agencies or until thirty 135° PPlioaton until it discretion submission ofa IIS-five )days have elapsed h e ved alre ort here PlanningInvestigate Laws.Notice le after receiving the above arming Board shall hod after Pub cuHe°of such aPPlicaOn o n we above Port, s Of Public the filing of the petition shall ccordance with Chapter on said a trout a Services,and Scho be ive pter 40 k of app as soon as Board. The PI of Department and fu n to the City Clerk he Massachusetts General decision shall docnIng Board shall noti rther notice shall 'police Department, neral menti the pro applicant in gen as re Department special he a be given effective emttt. The Pl P°sed development or use of its decision 9ulred by the PI notice r amm�g Board may, Planning Th Deeds, Prospective y'as a condition ofand the grounds for on the special Permit. The of the condition Purchasers, b approval granting or refusin succe associated with said signs or by recording 'require that g the r in title --Z'al iate g the s he applicant effects ofsamecmiseS and the steps pcPbrmit at the give tr3 of Ps y the p Regis s gnature ofq0'0petitioner or his PPlicant M /Z--/ Sigaature of Owner ate (a ached consent letter is also acceptable) ;fit Date r f FEE PAID- i "^{ 5 �. rryOFSALEM , PLANNING BOARD +Y CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION Location ofSITE PLAN REVIEW Property.; 3 Harmony grove Rd, Proposed Date of Hearing: Grove Street 6 Applicant; aring: Date of Submittal; MRM protect Management, LLC City, State,Zip Code: I Telephone: 978— Beverly, 01915 Pro'ectDescri tion: 922-7089 a. Zoning district: b. Square footage ofparceh 296,660 sf c. Square footage ofstructure s . d. R S O es Square Iden 9 fo tia e. °tageoffootprint: 1• 135,J68 sf. NO. of _Rest Commercial' el hmg units(if applicable): 141 17.000 sf H. Additional lnfo rmation: 64 sf Information required includes one copy of all info this aPplicatioq all co rtnation with Ciand the following pies must be sta/nped With City Clerk). Clerk and fifteen (15)copiesswitonal info th the Plannintion. File a. A Site Plan at g Board all re a scale of 1" 4p> (or as established b qufollow n : set forth in Section I11B and the following: Y Planning Board of the Salem Subdivision Regulations 1• Location and dimensions of all buildingsdations 2• Location and dimensions of all and Other construction. driveways. parking areas, loading areas, walkways,and 3• Location and dimensions of all adjacent public roadwayinternal roadways and access ways to s. 4• Location and type of external lighting. �x 5• Location, type,di dimensions and qualities oflandsca 6. Location and dimensions of utilitiesgas, telephone, electrical Pmg and screening. , communication, water, drainage, 7. Location of snow removalsewer and other 3 + waste disposal ' 8. Loc areas. Location of all existingz '. natural streams, wetlands, and including ponds, brooks, i . 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site,with two-foot contours. 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural style b. A brief narrative,as requested by the Planning Board addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: 1. Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow,circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting 5. Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area c. An Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. III. Procedure: The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report.The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor in title to alleviate the effects of same. ig at a 'Applicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable) Date Date FEE PAID: z ri { Project Narrative In Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications For Legacy Park 60 _ Apartments at Har 64 Grove Street $ 3 Harmony Grove Harmony Grove Road d Introlntro—ct The project general) Oil & Grease facto y involves co described rY site on Grove prehensive redevelopment below, the re Street and Harmony Grove R the former m multi-family-residential ti evelo square-fo pment Plans include Road, rmer Sale of existin uildings and re- construction As further remove the man g commercial office use of an approxim of three access from Y dilapidated s building. Th ately 17 p tructures from a redevelo �Q neighborhood. y Grove Road, and anch t e Property, restore veschem h cu ae Will annon 1 Build revitalization of the Mack Park — The project proposes existing three_sto construction units of o story office of three reside residential b and two- building The residential residential buildings and reuse id an types and colors buildings are designed With With four stories of will each provide 47 massing elementsall designed to bleu multiple gable roofs living space. The Provided i ase similar in scale to nearby the neighborhood b varying g n the basement of sidin each building Y residential to thstructures.crearkin smaller The renovation of the g and adjacent to the Parkin meant to existing buildings g is building honor the past b g office building 9 while updating it to reusing the form dating the opposite side t meet modern Salem Oil& Grease ad a canal is 2. Parkin building code require administrative & Loadin ments. The residential esidential buildings WillLegacy each contain 33 s Al Ma""o"Y c oae"e"rs paces of parking within the Page 1 of 4 s� 12/20/11 basement of the structures, supplemented with 116 spaces of surface parking, for a total of 215 spaces. The parking ratio for the residential units is 1.5 spaces per unit. Loading for the residential buildings will be limited to daytime and will occur at the front entrance to each building. The commercial building will have 24 spaces of surface level parking. This is equivalent to 1.4 spaces per 1,000 gsf of floor area. An existing loading dock at the rear of the commercial building will be maintained for loading purposes. 3. Traffic Flow and Circulation The main entrance for the residential buildings will be via an improved crossing of the North River Canal off of Harmony Grove Road. Secondary access and egress point will be from Grove Street. These access and egress locations, and the parking spaces adjacent to the buildings, create a longitudinal traffic pattern through the site. The garage parking for each residential building will have its own entrance point off of the longitudinal corridor, which will have the effect of distributing traffic movement. The commercial building will be accessed from Grove Street exclusively. 4. Extemal Lighting The site lighting plan relies on "shoebox" style lighting fixtures to cast light downward onto the parking and pedestrian surfaces. These fixtures will be mounted on approximately 18-foot taillight standards. The topography of the site, which drops approximately 30-feet from Beaver Street to the North River canal, sets the light fixtures below the grade of nearby Beaver Street residences. The light fixtures include lenses to direct the"throw" of light and to minimize off-site dispersion. The exterior lighting circuits will be fitted with timers and ambient light sensors. Wall-packs or similar fixtures will be located at the secondary building entrances, and along the rear of the residential buildings. The wall-packs at the rear of the residential buildings are intended to cast light on the canal pathway. The wall packs will have shields and lenses to minimize unwanted light dispersion. Lamps in the lighting fixtures will be energy-efficient high-pressure sodium. 5. Landscapinq and Screeninq A comprehensive landscaping plan is proposed to provide appropriate screening and natural amenities to the site. Approximately 2,700 plants will be placed at the site. The landscaping plan maximizes use of commercially-available native plant Legacy Park Apartments 12/20/1 t At Harmony Grove Page 2 of 4 species while providing year-round color. The main site entrance will include stone-masonry walls incorporating site signage and surrounded by evergreens and annual plantings. The site design intentionally maintains existing mature vegetation along the southwestern property boundary. This vegetation will provide natural screening of the site from the Beaver Street vicinity. The mature vegetation will be . supplemented with plantings throughout the parking areas to fill-in specific locations. For example, lilac bushes will be planted above the proposed retaining wall along the main parking field. These shrubs will supplement the mature vegetation closer to the ground surface. The parking area surrounding the commercial building will be reconstructed with planting strips and beds around its perimeter. The planting beds proposed along Grove Street will significantly improve the appearance of this building. 6. Utilities Existing utility services to the site will be reused. The former industrial uses at the site required substantial water, sewer, and electricity services. The proposed uses will generally have lower demands on these utilities than the former uses required. All of the buildings will have fire-suppression sprinklers and modern alarm systems. 7. Snow Removal Adequate snow storage is provided at key locations adjacent to the parking lots throughout the site (see Landscape Plan). Should snow storage capacity prove to be inadequate, the Federated Companies will remove snow from the site. 8. Natural Area Protection and Enhancement The site has been substantially disturbed by centuries of industrial uses. The proposed project will not disturb any natural areas. The project will assist efforts to enhance the quality of the North River Canal. Redevelopment of this site will facilitate environmental improvements along the canal, removal of existing dilapidated structures, and improve public access along the canal. Development of the pathway along the canal will coordinate with long-term off-site improvements, and thereby enhance opportunities to enjoy the North River canal Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 3 of 4 12/20111 and improve bicycle and pedestrian transportation between Salem and Peabody. 9. Topography and Maintenance The topography of the site is characterized by generally flat land along the North River canal and along Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road, and a steep embankment along the southwestern edge of the property along Beaver Street. The proposed development takes advantage of this topographic change by keeping all of the proposed construction at the lower elevation, and maintaining the embankment with its mature vegetation along Beaver Street. This topographic change and mature vegetation provide a natural buffer which will assist in screening the project from the Beaver Street. Construction and maintenance of the site will be by the Federated Companies. Federated Companies has professional, experienced construction and property managers who understand the importance and value of properly maintained facilities. The buildings, parking areas, public-access walkway and the extensive landscaping plans included in this application will be professionally maintained. 10.Compatibility of Architecture with Surrounding Area The surrounding architecture is mainly industrial and residential. The Residential Buildings are designed with multiple gable roofs and three different siding types and colors all designed to minimize the size of the overall structures by creating smaller massing elements similar to the residential component of the area. The use of clapboards and shingles is in keeping with the residential design vocabulary evident throughout the city of Salem and New England. The renovation of the existing industrial building on the opposite side of the canal is meant to honor the past by maintaining the shell of the historic building while updating it to give the building a new sense of vitality for its contemporary purpose. The industrial building renovation will include new siding throughout and a glass exposure along Grove Street, which will clearly indicate the commercial nature of the building. Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 4 of 4 12120/11 Project Narrative In Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications For Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road 60 - 64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Introduction The project generally involves comprehensive redevelopment of the former Salem Oil & Grease factory site on Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road. As further described below, the redevelopmentme nt plans include construction of three multi-family it residential buildings and re-use of an approximately 17,000 square-foot existing commercial office building. The redevelopment scheme will remove the many dilapidated structures from the property, restore vehicular access from Harmony Grove Road, and anchor the revitalization of the Mack Park neighborhood. 1. Buildings The project proposes construction of three residential buildings and reuse of an existing three-story office building. The residential buildings will each provide 47 units of one and two-bedroom apartments with four stories of living space. The residential buildings are designed with multiple gable roofs with varying siding types and colors - all designed to blend into the neighborhood by creating smaller massing elements similar in scale to nearby residential structures. Parking is provided in the basement of each building and adjacent to the buildings. The renovation of the existing office building on the opposite side of the canal is meant to honor the past by reusing the former Salem Oil & Grease administrative building while updating it to meet modern building code requirements. 2. Parking & Loading The residential buildings will each contain 33 spaces of parking within the Legacy Park Apartments page 1 of 4 12/20/11 At Harmony Grove basement of the structures, supplemented with 116 spaces of surface parking, for a total of 215 spaces. The parking ratio for the residential units is 1.5 spaces per unit. Loading for the residential buildings will be limited to daytime and will occur at the front entrance to each building. The commercial building will have 24 spaces of surface level parking. This is equivalent to 1.4 spaces per 1,000 gsf of floor area. An existing loading dock at the rear of the commercial building will be maintained for loading purposes. 3. Traffic Flow and Circulation The main entrance for the residential buildings will be via an improved crossing of the North River Canal off of Harmony Grove Road. Secondary access and egress point will be from Grove Street. These access and egress locations, and the parking spaces adjacent to the buildings, create a longitudinal traffic pattern through the site. The garage parking for each residential building will have its own entrance point off of the longitudinal corridor, which will have the effect of distributing traffic movement. The commercial building will be accessed from Grove Street exclusively. 4. External Lighting The site lighting plan relies on "shoebox" style lighting fixtures to cast light downward onto the parking and pedestrian surfaces. These fixtures will be mounted on approximately 18-foot tall light standards. The topography of the site, which drops approximately 30-feet from Beaver Street to the North River canal, sets the light fixtures below the grade of nearby Beaver Street residences. The light fixtures include lenses to direct the "throw" of light and to minimize off-site dispersion. The exterior lighting circuits will be fitted with timers and ambient light sensors. Wall-packs or similar fixtures will be located at the secondary building entrances, and along the rear of the residential buildings. The wall-packs at the rear of the residential buildings are intended to cast light on the canal pathway. The wall packs will have shields and lenses to minimize unwanted light dispersion. Lamps in the lighting fixtures will be energy-efficient high-pressure sodium. 5. Landscaping and Screening A comprehensive landscaping plan is proposed to provide appropriate screening and natural amenities to the site. Approximately 2,700 plants will be placed at the site. The landscaping plan maximizes use of commercially-available native plant Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 2 of 4 12/20/11 species while providing year-round color. The main site entrance will include stone-masonry walls incorporating site signage and surrounded by evergreens and annual plantings. The site design intentionally maintains existing mature vegetation along the southwestern property boundary. This vegetation will provide natural screening of the site from the Beaver Street vicinity. The mature vegetation will be supplemented with plantings throughout the parking areas to fill-in specific locations. For example, lilac bushes will be planted above the proposed retaining wall along the main parking field. These shrubs will supplement the mature vegetation closer to the ground surface. The parking area surrounding the commercial building will be reconstructed with planting strips and beds around its perimeter. The planting beds proposed along Grove Street will significantly improve the appearance of this building. 6. Utilities Existing utility services to the site will be reused. The former industrial uses at the site required substantial water, sewer, and electricity services. The proposed uses will generally have lower demands on these utilities than the former uses required. All of the buildings will have fire-suppression sprinklers and modern alarm systems. 7. Snow Removal Adequate snow storage is provided at key locations adjacent to the parking lots throughout the site (see Landscape Plan). Should snow storage capacity prove to be inadequate, the Federated Companies will remove snow from the site. 8. Natural Area Protection and Enhancement The site has been substantially disturbed by centuries of industrial uses. The proposed project will not disturb any natural areas. The project will assist efforts to enhance the quality of the North River Canal. Redevelopment of this site will facilitate environmental improvements along the canal, removal of existing dilapidated structures, and improve public access along the canal. Development of the pathway along the canal will coordinate with long-term off-site improvements, and thereby enhance opportunities to enjoy the North River canal Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 3 of 4 12/20/11 and improve bicycle and pedestrian transportation between Salem and Peabody. 9. Topography and Maintenance The topography of the site is characterized by generally flat land along the North River canal and along Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road, and a steep embankment along the southwestern edge of the property along Beaver Street. The proposed development takes advantage of this topographic change by keeping all of the proposed construction at the lower elevation, and maintaining the embankment with its mature vegetation along Beaver Street. This topographic change and mature vegetation provide a natural buffer which will assist in screening the project from the Beaver Street. Construction and maintenance of the site will be by the Federated Companies. Federated Companies has professional, experienced construction and property managers who understand the importance and value of properly maintained facilities. The buildings, parking areas, public-access walkway and the extensive landscaping plans included in this application will be professionally maintained. 10.Compatibility of Architecture with Surrounding Area The surrounding architecture is mainly industrial and residential. The Residential Buildings are designed with multiple gable roofs and three different siding types and colors all designed to minimize the size of the overall structures by creating smaller massing elements similar to the residential component of the area. The use of clapboards and shingles is in keeping with the residential design vocabulary evident throughout the city of Salem and New England. The renovation of the existing industrial building on the opposite side of the canal is meant to honor the past by maintaining the shell of the historic building while updating it to give the building a new sense of vitality for its contemporary purpose. The industrial building renovation will include new siding throughout and a glass exposure along Grove Street, which will clearly indicate the commercial nature of the building. Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 4 of 4 12/20/11 Environmental Impact Statement In Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications For Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road 60 - 64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Introduction This Environmental Impact Statement discusses the proposed project in response to the topics presented in Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. For the reviewer's convenience, the topics are discussed in the order presented in the regulations., In the text below, italics represent the topic as provided in the regulations and the response follows the word "Response:" 1.0 Natural Environment 1.1 Air. 1.1.a Describe possible sources and duration of significant amounts of odors, smoke and dust. Response: There are no known sources of odors or smoke anticipated with the proposed project. Dust could be generated during the construction process, but will be minimized as outlined in 1.1.b. 1.1.b Describe precaution to be taken to eliminate or minimize the adverse environmental effects of the smoke, dust or odors generated. Response: Dust generated during construction will be minimized by the application of water and calcium chloride to travelled portions of the site. Dust control will depend on weather conditions and the construction activities ongoing at the time. Calcium chloride use will be minimized along the North River canal, to avoid potential water quality impacts. 1.1.c Describe the relationship of the location of the subdivision and prevailing wind patterns to nearby residences, businesses, recreation area, and other public areas. Legacy Park Apartments Page 1 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove Response: Long term meteorological records suggest that prevailing winds are generally from the northwest during winter months and from the west-southwest during the summer months. Downwind properties in the winter months support primarily commercial and residential land uses; in the summer months commercial uses and the Harmony Grove Cemetery are downwind. The proposed residential and office uses at this site are unlikely to create odorous or noxious conditions that could migrate downwind. 1.1.d If incineration of refuse is proposed for the subdivision, describe the effects resultant emissions will have on air quality in the area. Include proof that the incinerator complies with the latest local and state standards. Response: Standard commercial refuse and recyclables collection will be employed at the site. The refuse and recyclables hauler will be required to bring these materials to solid waste handling facilities complying with the applicable environmental requirements of the state the facility is located within. 1.2 Land 1.2.a Describe the existing general physical conditions of the site, including existing use, general topography, unusual geologic formations and soils, and how the project will effect these features. Response: The site is approximately 6.8 acres in size and is generally flat, with an embankment sloping up to Beaver Street on its southwestern side. The elevation change between Beaver Street and the site is approximately 30 feet. The sloped embankment contains some mature vegetation and is heavily littered with trash and debris apparently deposited from abutting properties. Most of the site is located above the 100-year flood elevation (elevation 10.8 NGVD datum). The portion of the site between the railroad tracks and at the main entrance off Harmony Grove Road varies in elevation from approximately 8.5 to 11 feet NGVD; the existing parking areas along Grove Street are constructed at approximately elevation 9.5 to 11 feet NGVD. The site is currently vacant. It was owned and operated by the Salem Oil & Grease Company for approximately 90 years until 2002. The site is developed with multiple industrial buildings with associated access driveways, parking lots, and material storage areas. The site is generally "run-down" with many degraded surfaces and debris scattered about the landscape. The site is bisected by the tidal North River Canal. Portions of the site along the North River Canal were at one time part of the tidal Mill Pond, an impoundment created by a dam located approximately at Grove Street. The dam was used to power industrial activity at and adjacent to the site. A variety of industrial activities have occurred at the site from the 1700's to today. Site soils are mapped by the United States Department of Agriculture — Soil Legacy Park Apartments Page 2 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove Conservation Service maps as being Urban Land. This mapping unit indicates that the soils have been significantly altered or obscured by urban works and structures. The portions of the site within the historical Mill Pond are filled lands. A limited amount of soil boring data is available from previous construction projects at the site. These generally indicate that in the central portion of the site, medium and fine sands and inorganic silts exist to approximately elevation -25 feet and overlay approximately 20 to 25 feet or more of medium stiff silty clay. Soils appear to be primarily sand and gravel closer to Beaver Street. The available soil boring data generally suggests that conventional construction techniques will be suitable for the construction project. As with any urban site with a limited geotechnical data set, soil conditions may vary causing the need to adapt construction techniques to the conditions occurring at the time of construction. The general condition of the existing buildings at and in the vicinity of the site suggest that conventional construction techniques can be effectively employed at the site. 1.2.b Describe any limitations on proposed project caused by subsurface soil and water conditions, and methods to be used to overcome them. Response: As stated above, conventional construction techniques are expected to be applicable to most of the site. The presence of fill along the North River Canal may require that portions of the buildings be supported by piles or other deep foundation methods extending through the fill into more competent soils below. Water conditions are unlikely to present a significant impediment to the proposed construction. The buildings will be constructed above grade with no basements. Utility installations may encounter water during construction and will be handled in appropriate manners Due to the past industrial activities at the site, a comprehensive site assessment is being undertaken by a Licensed Site Professional (LSP). Appropriate environmental remediation work and worker-safety precautions will be undertaken during construction based on the LSP's findings. 1.2.c Describe procedures and findings of percolation tests conducted on the site. Response: Percolation tests are not applicable to this project, which will be connected to an existing municipal sewer in Grove Street. Based on the soil conditions noted above, percolation rates would be expected to be moderate to rapid. 1.2.d Describe the types and amounts of land which will be permanently affected by construction of the subdivision. Response: All three parcels will be affected by the proposed construction. The 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel will be traversed with a new site access bridge and Legacy Park Apartments Page 3 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove roadway, and landscape work will occur along this corridor. The disturbance of 3 Harmony Grove Road will be approximately 25% of the 35,561 sf parcel. At the 60 Grove Street parcel, essentially all of the 26,946 sf parcel will be affected by the proposed improvements. The existing office building on this parcel will remain intact, but will be thoroughly renovated throughout. The barrel storage building will be removed, the parking area reconstructed, and the site landscaped. At the approximately 5.4 acre 64 Grove Street parcel, approximately one acre of land will remain undisturbed. This is primarily the strip of land along the southwest boundary of the parcel (the Beaver Street side) in which existing mature vegetation will be maintained. 1.2.e Describe proposed rough grading plans. Response: On the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel, a small amount of regrading will occur to accommodate the new bridge over the North River Canal. At the 60 Grove Street parcel, rough grades will not change. At the 64 Grove Street parcel, a combination of fill placement along the southwest face of the proposed buildings and cutting into the existing embankment will occur to provide a flat parking area at approximately the first floor level. Concrete block retaining walls are proposed on the uphill side of the parking lot to minimize disturbance of the existing embankment and its mature vegetation. Within the building footprints, the parking level will be approximately 10 feet below the first floor elevation. The parking level will be at approximately the same grade as the proposed landscaping and bike path along the North River canal. In the northwestern comer of the site existing soils will be regraded to provide an approximately flat parking area near the railroad tracks. 1.21 Describe location and extent of existing marshes, wetlands, or seasonal wet areas and any proposed alteration. Response: The North River Canal transects the project site. Between the 60 & 64 Grove Street parcels, the canal is confined by granite block retaining walls. The canal transects the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel and is confined by sloping embankments in this parcel. No alteration of wetland areas will be necessary for the project with the exception of minor or temporary disturbances necessary to install a new bridge, utilities and roadway across the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel. 1.3 Water and Wetlands 1.3.a Evaluate how and to what extent the project will affect the quality and quantity of any existing or potential public or private water supply, including watersheds, reservoirs and groundwater. Legacy Park Apartments Page 4 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: Due to the industrial history of this portion of Salem and the close proximity of the site to saline water bodies, this site has no potential use as a public or private water supply. Site redevelopment will therefore not directly benefit potential water supplies. Redevelopment may significantly improve groundwater quality at the site, by facilitating environmental cleanup work under the direction of the Licensed Site Professional. Groundwater quality improvements will also improve quality in the North River Canal, since groundwater at the site discharges to the canal. The proposed project includes a new drainage system that is designed to be in complete compliance with the applicable standards of the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Guidelines. Stormwater runoff from the proposed parking lots will be treated prior to being discharged. Roof runoff from the proposed buildings will also be captured and infiltrated to provide groundwater recharge in accordance with the standards. These stormwater management improvements will also benefit water quality in the North River Canal. 1.3.b Describe the methods to be used during construction to control erosion and sedimentation and siltation including use of sediment basins and type of mulching, matting, or temporary vegetation, approximate size and location of land to be cleared at any given time and length of time to exposure, covering of soil stockpiles, and other control methods used. Evaluate effectiveness of proposed methods on the site and on the surrounding areas. Response: A comprehensive erosion control program will be undertaken during . construction. Haybales and silt fence will be installed along the downgradient edge of the proposed work area as approved by the local Conservation Commission. A construction entrance will also be installed at the Grove Street entrance and will be maintained until the pavement binder course is installed.. Silt sacks will be installed and maintained in the vicinity of the proposed construction entrance. Only the portion of land that is affected by the redevelopment of the site will be cleared. To help prevent off-site erosion, disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched as soon as practicable. Proposed slopes steeper than 3h:1v shall be stabilized with erosion control matting and seeded. Temporary stockpiles of existing on-site soil materials will be created during construction. Stockpiles will be encircled with erosion control barriers and covered. Additional earth materials received for construction are expected to be ordered as needed and installed upon arrival. 1.3.c Describe the permanent methods to be used to control erosion and sedimentation. Include description of: Legacy Park Apartments Page 5 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 1.3.c.1 -any areas subject to flooding or ponding; Response: All areas located within the 100-year flood zone will be stabilized with either bituminous pavement or landscaping. No erosion is anticipated. 1.3.c.2-proposed surface drainage system; Response: A conventional piped drainage system is proposed. Stormwater runoff from all paved surfaces will be directed to and treated by catchbasins or other treatment devices prior to being discharged to the North River Canal. Each catchbasin will be equipped with a 4-foot deep sump and hood to prevent sediments, oils and floatable trash from discharging directly into the river. Most of the paved parking area will also be treated by Stormcepter pretreatment units. Stormwater from the roofs of the proposed buildings will be captured and conveyed to infiltration beds for groundwater recharge. During extreme storm events, surplus roof runoff will flow into the on-site drainage system. 1.3.c.3 -proposed land grading and permanent vegetation cover, Response: The proposed land regrading is shown on the project Grading and Drainage Plan. Regraded areas will be stabilized as soon as practicable with a well vegetated grass surface or landscaped planting bed. 1.3.c.4 -methods to be used to protect existing vegetation; Response: The clearing limit will be restricted to the area necessary to construct the proposed project. Erosion control barriers or other methods of demarcation (i.e. snow fence, flagging, etc.) will to be set along the clearing limit at the beginning of construction. Erosion control barriers will not be removed until work has been completed and stabilized. 1.3.c.5- the relationship of the development to the topography,• Response: The proposed development requires retaining walls and regrading along the southerly portion of the project site. The remaining topography will remain approximately the same as current conditions. All areas disturbed during construction will be stabilized with vegetation or finish surfaces as soon as practicable. 1.3.c.6- any existing or proposed alterations of shorelines, marshes or seasonal wet areas; Response: None 1.3.c.7- any existing or proposed flood control or wetland easements; Response: None Legacy Park Apartments Page 6 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove 1.3.c:8- estimated increase of peak runoff caused by altered surface conditions, and methods to be used to return water to the soils. Response: Drainage calculations have been performed and are separately provided. Future peak stormwater runoff rates are similar to existing conditions. Groundwater recharge is proposed through a large infiltration bed located beneath parking areas. 1.3.d Discuss the probability that the project will increase pollution or turbidity levels within receiving waterway and the precautions to be taken to minimize the effects. Response: The project is likely to reduce pollution and turbidity levels within the North River Canal. The proposed project includes conducting environmental clean-up work to address contamination remaining from past industrial uses. The proposed project will provide stable surfaces and clean impervious surfaces routed through a modern drainage system. Under current conditions, there are little if any stormwater management controls at the site. The placement of deep sump catch basins, stormwater pretreatment devices, and infiltration beds at the site will reduce the amount of pollutants that are conveyed from the project site during storm events. 1.3.e Discuss the project's effect on the waterway's aquatic biota and use as habitats. Response: For reasons specified above, the project is likely to improve water quality in the North River Canal. This will in turn improve aquatic habitat and its ability to support a variety of biota. 1.3.f Discuss the project's effects on groundwater quality and supply and efforts to recharge groundwater supplies. Response: As discussed above, the proposed project is likely to improve groundwater quality at the site. The construction of groundwater recharge structures below parking areas are intended to recharge groundwater supplies so that on an annual basis, groundwater recharge is approximately equal to pre- development conditions. 1.3.g Discuss what effect the project will have on increasing the incidence of flooding, including areas outside the subdivision. Response: Drainage calculations have been performed for the proposed project. Due to the extensive stormwater management improvements proposed for the site, the estimated peak stormwater runoff rates following construction will be similar to existing conditions. Therefore, no increase in flooding incidences is anticipated due to the project. 1.3.h Discuss the effect of the proposed sewerage disposal methods on surface and groundwater supplies and quality. Legacy Park Apartments Page 7 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove Response: No impacts to groundwater supplies from the proposed sewerage system are expected. Sewage will be conveyed through sealed pipes and structures to the municipal sewer system in Grove Street. 1.4 Enem 1.4.a Describe the types and increased quantity of energy required to serve the needs of the project residents. Response: The estimated power annual power consumption is approximately: Residential Buildings Commercial Building Heating Load: 6,500 MMBtu 500 MMBtu Electrical Load: 4,000 MMBtu 450 MMBtu 1.4.b Indicate what the sources of this energy will be. Response: Natural gas will be used for heating. Electricity will be used for lights, appliances, and cooling. Adequate utilities are available adjacent to the site. 1.5 Noise 1.5.a Describe the time, duration and types of noises generated by the project, both during and after construction. Response: During the construction phase, construction activities are expected to begin at approximately 7:00 AM and be completed by 6:00 PM. Moderate noise levels associated with the construction equipment is anticipated. During the building demolition phase, a wrecking ball will be likely employed. During the foundation construction phase, noise associated with the installation of pile foundation supports may occur leg. pile driving). Generally, soil conditions appear to not require blasting, so use of that construction technique during this project should be minimal. During the operational phase, noise levels are not expected to be significant. Multifamily residential developments generally generate little noise. 1.5.b Discuss what effect these noises will have on both humans and wildlife. Response: During the construction phase, OSHA noise level requirements will be satisfied in the work zones. Beyond the work zones, noise levels are expected to drop to moderate levels prior to reaching neighboring housing units. By maintaining mature vegetation along Beaver Street, noise impacts are minimized. The presence of existing buildings and structures on the east side of the side will block noises emanating in this direction. Legacy Park Apartments Page 8 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove The construction activities will create noise levels noticeable to humans and wildlife. However, as noted above, the noise levels are expected to be typical of residential construction projects, and of a temporary nature. The post- construction noise associated with the multi-family dwellings is not expected to be significant. 1.5.c Describe the controls which will be used to eliminate or minimize the effects of these noises. Response: Construction noise effects will be minimized by 1) the use of mufflers on all construction equipment, 2) providing temporary power to the worksite so gas powered generators are not required, and 3) limiting the work hours as noted above. Maintaining existing mature vegetation to the maximum extent practicable between the work area and the off-site residences, as proposed by the Applicant, will minimize off-site noise levels. 1.6 Local Flora and Fauna 1.6.a Discuss the project's effects on land-based ecosystems, such as the indigenous wildlife,,stream bank cover, and vegetal or wooded growth. Response: The project will redevelop land that has been substantially altered by previous activities at the site. The existing land surfaces are degraded; wildlife activity at the site is minimal. Disturbance of stream bank cover and the wooded growth along the perimeter of the property has been minimized. 1.6.b Describe proposed types and amounts of vegetative cover. Response: All cleared and disturbed areas, except buildings and hardscape surfaces, are to be covered with planting beds or loam and seed. A Landscaping Plan has been prepared by a landscape architect indicating placement of approximately 2,700 trees, shrubs and perennials to be planted at the project site. 1.6.c Discuss the existence of rare or endangered plant, wildlife or fish species in the project area. Response: There are no known rare or endangered plant, wildlife or fish species in the project area. Efforts are underway to improve Rainbow Smelt spawning in the North River. The water quality improvements associated with site redevelopment will directly benefit these efforts. 2.0 Man-Made Environment 2.1 Land use 2.1.a Describe how the proposed project conforms with the growth plans for the area and the city in general. Legacy Park Apartments Page 9 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove Response: In 2003 the City prepared the North River Canal Corridor (NRCC) plan, which addressed land southeast of the project site. Although the NRCC plan did not directly address the subject site, the proposed project is consistent with the plan mission in that it is rehabilitating an abandoned and dilapidated Brownfield site and creating a neighborhood use adjacent to the existing residential uses. The commercial component of the project integrates well with its immediately abutting land uses. The NRCC plans provide a framework for new growth and development in the North River area primarily consisting of mixed uses, which is consistent with this proposal. The proposed project conforms to other growth plans of the city because it provides improvements along an existing entrance corridor(Harmony Grove Road, Grove Street, etc.). Also, the proposed project provides a bike path along the canals edge which is generally consistent with the 1996 City of Salem Master Plan. 2.1.b Describe land uses adjacent to the project. Response: The Beaver Street and Silver Street residential neighborhoods are located to the south and west of the project site. The Harmony Grove Cemetery is located to the north, along the northerly side of Harmony Grove Road. Commercial and industrial buildings are located to the northeast along both sides of Grove Street. To the east of the site, a mixed-use development (at 28 Goodhue Street) was recently permitted. The 28 Goodhue Street project contained commercial space on the first floor level and 44 units of residential condominiums on the upper three levels. 2.1.c Describe any existing or proposed public or common recreational or open areas within the subdivision. Response: A bike path with seating areas is proposed along the southerly edge of the canal. Public bike path access during daylight hours is proposed. 2.1.d Discuss the site's proximity to transportation, shopping, educational facilities, recreational facilities, etc. Response: Public Transportation —MBTA Bus Route 465, stop at the intersection of Nicholas and Boston Street (0.1 mi.), and Salem Train Station (1 mi.). Shopping —Walgreens Pharmacy (0.2 mi.); Peabody Stop & Shop (0.5 mi.); and North Shore Mall (2.5 mi.). Educational Facilities — Salem High School (1.0 mi.); Collins Middle School (0.6 mi.); Bates Elementary School (1.1 mi.); and Salem Public Library (0.7 mi.). Recreational Facilities— Salem Golf Course (1.3 mi.); Mack Park (0.1 mi.); and Gallows Hill Park (0.5 mi.). Legacy Park Apartments Page 10 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove 2.2 Density 2.2.a Provide a tabulation of proposed buildings by type, size (number of bedrooms, floor area), ground coverage, and a summary showing the percentage of the tract to be occupied by buildings, parking and other paved vehicular areas, and usable open space. Response: Table 2.2: Summary of Site Development Description / Location: 64 Gove Street 60 Grove Street Total Site Land Use Multi-Family Commercial Mixed Residential Building Number of Buildings 3 1 4 Number of Units/Building 47 TBD — Number of Res. Units 141 — 141 Number of Bedrooms 3 @ 83 -- 249 Number of Stories 4 3 -- Building Foot rint 3 11,480 SF 6,864 SF 41,304 SF Gross Floor Area Y_@45,256 SF 17,000 +/- SF 152,768 +/- SF Lot Area 234,152 SF 26,659 SF 296,659 SF Building Coverage 14.7% 25.7% 13.9% Pavement Coverage 30.4% 44.9% 29.5% Open Space 1 54.9% 1 29.7% 56.6% 1 — Includes 3 Harmony Grove Road 2.3 Zonino 2.3.a Indicate the zoning designations for the site and adjacent areas. Response: Site: Residential Two-Family District (R2) Business Park Development District (BPD) Wetland and Flood Hazard Overlay District (WFHOD) Entrance Corridor Overlay District (ECOD) Adjacent: Residential One-Family District (R1) North River Canal Corridor (NRCC) Industrial (1) 2.4 Architecture 2.4.a Describe the architectural and landscaping techniques which will be used to blend the structures with the surrounding area. Response: The exterior facades of the proposed residential building will have the Legacy Park Apartments Page 11 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove appearance of traditional wood siding and shingles, consistent with the adjacent residential areas. The project site will be well landscaped with lawns and planting beds (approximately 2,700 trees, shrubs, and perennials), and will maintain existing mature vegetation along Beaver Street. 2.4.b Discuss the heights of the structures in relation to the surrounding area. Response: The proposed residential buildings are 4-stories tall along their front (southerly) side and 5-stories tall along their rear (northerly/river) side. Parking is proposed in the lower level of the buildings. The ridge elevation of the proposed buildings will be approximately the same as the ridge elevations of the two-story residential buildings along Beaver Street. 2.4.c Discuss the project's visual impact and possible interference with natural views. Response: The project will significantly improve natural views at and near the site. The industrial history of the site is clearly apparent in the existing dilapated buildings, abandoned roadways and storage areas, and crumbling facades. The new buildings and landscaping, which maximize use of native species, will provide year-round color and rid this section of Salem of the existing eyesores. The North River Canal bike path will provide scenic opportunities to enjoy the ongoing North River restoration efforts. 2.4.d .Describe type of construction building materials used, location of common areas, location and type of service facilities (laundry, trash, garbage disposal). Response: The proposed residential buildings will generally be wood and steel framed structures with weather-resistant clapboard and shingle exteriors. Common parking facilities will be provided in the lower level of the apartment buildings and on the project site. The landscaped areas surrounding the buildings and along the North River Canal are designated as common areas for recreational activities. Individual laundry facilities will be provided in each apartment unit; common refuse and recyclable disposal areas will be provided in each building. 2.5 Historic Buildings Historical Sites and Archeoloaical Sites 2.5.a Indicate location and significance of any historic buildings or sites on or adjacent to the project. Response: None 3.0 Public Facilities 3.1 Water Supply, Flow. Pressure and Distribution. 3.1.a Describe the groundwater and/or surface water supply to be used. Legacy Park Apartments Page 12 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: Municipal water will be used. Salem obtains water from surface water supplies (Wenham Lake & Ipswich River). 3.1.b Discuss the demands of the project for consumption and fire protection. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, the demand for domestic water consumption is estimated to be approximately 25,700 gallons/day. The peak demand for fire protection for any on-site building is estimated to be approximately 1,500 gallons per minute. The buildings will be equipped with fire suppression sprinklers and hard-wired fire alarm systems. 3.2 Sanitary Sewerage Connection. Distribution and Facilities 3.2.a Discuss the quantity and type of sewage which will be generated by the project. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, the estimated sewage generation by the proposed project is approximately 28,500 gallons/day. 3.2.b Describe the method of sewage which will be generated by the project. Response: Domestic sanitary sewage. 3.3 Storm Drainage Facilities 3.3.a Describe where connection to the City system is proposed. Response: There is no proposed connection to a municipal drainage system. The project will drain to the North River Canal through a modern stormwater management system. 3.4 Disposition of Stormwater 3.4.a Indicate the location of all proposed outfalls. Response: Stormwater runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces will be captured, treated, and discharged to the North River Canal at four outfall locations as shown on Sheet C-4: One outfall is located near the Grove Street Bridge, one at the westerly end of the renovated commercial building, one near the railroad bridge, and the fourth near the proposed vehicle bridge. Drainage patterns are generally similar to existing conditions. 3.4.b Describe the effect of the outfalls and their discharge on the receiving waters, i.e., increased flows, pollution etc. Response: As described above, the proposed project is expected to improve Legacy Park Apartments Page 13 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove receiving water quality and lessen pollutant discharges from the site. Proposed stormwater discharge rates will be similar to existing conditions. No flooding impacts are anticipated due to site redevelopment. 3.4.c. Discuss the quantity of stormwater to be discharged. Response: The pre- and post-development volumes of stormwater runoff from the project site are as follows: 2-year 10- ear 25- ear 100- ear Pre-Develo ment 61,288 103,026 130,748 165,158 Post-Development c 61,070 102,198 129,630 163,769 3.5 Refuse Disposal 3.5.a. Estimate the quantity and types of refuse that will be generated by the subdivision. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, approximately 2,000 pounds of refuse and recyclables will be generated per day. 3.5.b Describe the proposed methods of refuse disposal. Response: Each residential building will be equipped with a dedicated trash and recycling area within the basement. Additionally, fenced enclosed areas will be provided adjacent to each building for spare and full containers. For the commercial building a small dumpster and recyclables storage area will be provided near the loading. Refuse and recyclables will be managed by a private disposal company. The transfer station on Swampscott Road is available to residents for disposal of larger items and is located approximately 2 miles from the project site. 3.6 Traffic Facilities 3.6.a Discuss future vehicular circulation patterns including number and types of vehicles. Response: Two-way traffic is proposed through the residential portion of the project site with entrances at Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. The Harmony Grove Road entrance will be the primary entrance to the site. The average weekday traffic is estimated to be 978 trips per day (i.e. 489 entering, 489 leaving) for the residential portion of the site and approximately 166 (i.e. 83 entering, 83 leaving) for the commercial portion of the site. The total weekday traffic from the project site is estimated at approximately 1,144 vehicle trips per a day. Most traffic will be passenger vehicles. Legacy Park Apartments Page 14 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove 3.6.b Describe the proposed pedestrian circulation pattern. Response: Sidewalks are provided along the main internal site roadway, providing access to all of the buildings and parking areas and connecting with existing sidewalks on Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. A public bike path is proposed along the North River and will be wide enough to allow for foot travel as well. 3.6.c Discuss the location and number of parking spaces proposed. Response: On the residential portion of the project site, parking is proposed within the building basements, along the front of the building, and in the westerly parking lot. A total of 215 parking spaces are provided for the residential buildings (1.52 spaceslunit). For the commercial building, 24 parking spaces are provided. Per Salem zoning regulations, this would allow for a business with a total of 24 employees. 3.7 Electric Dower 3.7.a Discuss the power demand of the subdivision. Response: Approximately 500 M (peak). 3.7.b. Discuss the source of the electric power and the method of supplying the area. Response: National Grid will provide the power. The existing overhead system for the 60 Grove Street commercial building will remain. For the residential buildings, underground electrical services will be provided from an existing utility pole located along the southerly side of the site. The service will be routed through pad mount transformers located adjacent to the proposed parking lots. 3.8 Gas 3.8.a Discuss the demands of the subdivision. Response: Approximately 2,000 MBTU (peak). 3.8.b Describe what the gas will be used for in the area. Response: Natural gas will be used for heating. 3.8.c Describe the source of gas supply and the proposed method of supplying the area. Response: National Grid is the local natural gas supplier. An existing gas main is located within Grove Street. Legacy Park Apartments Page 15 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove 4.0 Community Services 4.1 Schools 4.1.a Discuss the effect of the subdivision on existing schools, including number and ages of children generated by the subdivision. Response: Based the 2000/2001 National Center of Educational Statistics and the US Census 2000 for Salem there were 5,007 students in the Salem Public Schools and 17,492 occupied housing units yielding 0.29 students per a household. The number of students generated by the 141 housing units is approximately 40. There is not enough statistical information to derive an approximate age of the children. 4.1.b Describe the location of the nearest existing schools. Response: The locations of the nearest public schools are Bates Elementary School (1.1 mi.); Collins Middle School (0.6.mi.); and Salem High School (1.0 mi.). 4.2 Recreation 4.2.a Describe existing and proposed recreational facilities, including active and passive types, and age groups participating, and state whether recreational facilities and open space are available to all Salem residents. Response: Recreational facilities in the general area are Salem Golf Course (1.3 mi.), Mack Park (0.1 mi.), and Gallows Hill Park (0.5 mi.). The listed facilities are available to all Salem residents. 4.2.b Indicate location and width of existing and proposed pedestrian ways, bikeways or bridle paths. Response: A proposed 10-foot wide public pedestrian and bike path is proposed along the North River Canal from Grove Street to the existing railroad crossing. 4.3 Police 4.3.a Estimate the total population projected for the subdivision. Response: Based on the 2000 US Census results for Salem the average household population is 2.24 persons. Applying this population to the proposed 141 residential units yields approximately 315 persons. 4.3.b Estimate the total number of automobiles for the area. Response: The total estimated number of vehicles at the project site is estimated to be approximately 240 vehicles. This is based on 1.5 vehicles per Legacy Park Apartments Page 16 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove 1 . residential unit and 24 vehicles for the commercial building. 4.4 Fire 4.4.a Discuss the total number of buildings to be constructed and their types and construction. Response: Three wood and steel framed apartment buildings are proposed on the 64 Grove Street site. One existing wood framed commercial building will remain on the 60 Grove Street site. 4.4.b Describe the source and quantity of water available for fire protection for the area. Response: Existing public water mains are located in Grove Street (8" & 12" diameter) and Beaver Street (8"diameter). Existing hydrants are also located in front of the 64 Grove Street parcel and adjacent to the existing way off of Beaver Street. An existing private main (6" diameter) extends down the aforementioned way onto the 64 Gove Street parcel. A private main (8"diameter) is proposed to connect to the existing private main and extend to the public main in Gove Street to create a looped water main. Three hydrants and dedicated building sprinkler services are proposed along the proposed main. 4.5 Public Works 4.5.a. Calculate the total linear feet of roadway to be publicly maintained and plowed. Response: No pubic roadways are proposed. 4.5.b Calculate the linear feet of street drains, culverts, sanitary sewers, and waterlines to be publicly maintained. Response: No publicly maintained utilities are proposed. 5.0 Human Considerations 5.1 Aesthetics and Visual Impact 5.1.a Discuss the change in the present character of the area due to the projects, i.e., land use, density of development, etc. Response: The proposed project will be a substantial betterment to the neighborhood. As noted above, the existing industrial site is run-down and falling down. Over the past five years, the Salem Police have visited the property approximately 35 times due to vandalism, theft, fires, and reports of breaking and entering. The proposed land uses are consistent with multiple projects recently permitted Legacy Park Apartments Page 17 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove La x" h .:. within the project area. The density of the proposed development is consistent with local zoning regulations. The proposed project will improve the character of the area 5.1.b Discuss the measures to be taken to minimize the adverse effects of the project, i.e., architecture, buffers etc. Response: The project site will be landscaped to minimize potential adverse effects. The developer will minimize the amount of vegetation removed along the southerly boundary to maintain a natural buffer between the proposed project and abutters. The proposed buildings have clean lines, classic colonial styling, and varied surface materials and color to provide visual relief. The buildings will blend well with the neighborhood. 5.2 Parks Forests and Recreational Areas 5.2.a Discuss how the siting and construction of the project will affect existing and potential park and recreation areas, open spaces, natural areas, and scenic values. Response: No affects anticipated. The proposed project will clean-up and enhance natural areas. The bike path could help link other open space projects along the North River Canal. The undeveloped portions of the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel could be made available in the future to the City for open space or natural area uses. 5.2.b. Discuss how the project will affect recreational opportunities in the area due to removal of parks, forests, or open areas from public use. Response: The proposed project will not remove parks, forest, or open space from public use. The propose project will improve public open space areas. 5.3 Public Health 5.3.a Discuss the project's effect on residents'public health due to changes in water quality, air quality, noise levels, etc. Response: The proposed project may improve the health of residents' through the removal of vacant industrial buildings, environmental remediation work, and anticipated improvements in groundwater and surface water quality. Legacy Park Apartments Page 18 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove 24 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1) INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ALONG TOP OF BANK AND LIMIT OF WORK. MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND ADJUST DAILY AS ........................................................... ....................... ..... ............................. ........................................................... ........................................................... ........................................................... ................... ..................................... ............................. 22.................................................. REQUIRED. 2) DECOMMISSION EXISTING SEWER PUMP STATION. REMOVE, SEWER UTILITIES FROM EXISTING BRIDGE. ........................................................... ......................... ............................... ........................................................... ......................... ........................................................... ................... ..................................... ............................. 20........................................................... ------- TING BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE AND ABUTMENTS AND DISPOSE 3) REMOVE EXISTING DECORATIVE: OFF-SITE. LIGHT POSTS 18 ----------------------------------------------------------- ........................................................... ......................... ............................... ........................................................... ........................................................... ........................................................... ................... ..................................... ............................. 4) STABILIZE EMBANKMENT WITH RIP RAP. 5) INSTALL TEMPORARY SHEET PILING COFFERDAMS AT PROPOSED ABUTMENTS. 6) STABILIZE EXPOSED BANK AND BASE OF WALL WITH RIP RAP SCOUR 16 ----------------------------------------------------------- ..................................... ..................... ......................... ............................... ........................................................... ........................................................... ........................................................... ............. ................................ ............................. PROTECTION. : S.E.S.D. SEWER EASEMENT 42 HIGH GUARD 7) EXCAVATE TO PROPOSED FOOTING GRADE. ESTABLISH DEWATERING SYSTEM. r 8) INSTALL FOOTING IPILING SUPPORTS. ..................................... ..................... ................... ------------------------- --- ......................................... ................................ ............................. 14 ........................................................... 9) FORM & POUR PILE CAP. 1-1A 10) FORM & POUR ABUTMENT WALLS. 11) REMOVE SHEET PILING AND FINISH INSTALLING RIP RAP.'. .................................................... ................................. ............................. 12 ----------------------------------------------------------- .........RADE Ff 12) INSTALL PROPOSED STEEL I-BEAM BRIDGE GIRDERS. 100-YR FLOOD . .............. ELEV. 10.8 .. .... .. . 13) FORM AND POUR CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK. bU-yK rLUUU: ....... ................. .... ..................................................... ........................................ .... 10 ........................................................... ...... ...... W/,PH-ASE-l&-2-ONL:Y------------------------ 14) CONSTRUCT BRIDGE CURBING, SIDEWALK & GUARDS. 7��-�FILOOD ELEV. 9.16 15) INSTALL ELECTRICAL CONDUITS AND BRIDGE LIGHTING. ELEV 1 !! !! - 16) FINE GRADE APPROACH RAMPS AND INSTALL BINDER COURSE. ........................................................... ............... ........ .............. ................ ... .................................... ----------------......50 FtOOID---------------------- ......... ........ ..../..�............................................... 8 17) INSTALL APPROACH CURBING AND SIDEWALK. -4mw BRIDGE I-BEAMS V W/ PHASE 3 WIDENING ....--.OTT.:....... EXISTING EXISTING BOTTOM OF COMPOSITE 4" TH. w - 18) LOAM AND SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS. ELEV. 7.1 ELEV. 7.09 STEEL I-BEAM GRADE GRADE STEEL I-BEAM CONC. DECK & 14"± . ........ELEV....8.65;L. 19) INSTALL FINISH PAVEMENT COURSE. ........................................................... ................ .. ........ ..................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ............................. 6 .................................................. 7: ELEV. DEEP STEEL I-BEAM A­R­M­0-R* P* R*0­0, OSED 20) REMOVE EROSION' CONTROLS AFTER ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABLE. M[HW ELEV. 5.0 ARMOR PROPIOSED REMOVE SIDESLOPES ALONG PROP. FINISH SIDESLOPES ALONG PROP. FINISH G......... ........ WIN.GWALLS..,&­BASE................. ... ....... ........ ..................... .... .............E&STO ............. ... .. 4 ---------- .............................. ................................W1NGVALLS­&l3ASE ER OM.'­........ ....... ---------RIVER"13OTTOM............. ............NECESSARY­ OF ABUTMENT WITH RIVER BED OF ABUTMENT::WITH 10% SLOPE 10% SLOPE 0=9") (APPROX.) RIP RAP (D5b=q") RIP RAP (D5 7 NOTE: ........................................................... ............... -------- ----- ...... .... . ............. ......................... . ................................................... ... ...................... ........ . ..... .. ...... ..................... ............................. 2 - -- --------------------------------- -- ----------------- 1) 50-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATIONS FROM METCALF & EDDY, JULY 18, 2008 LETTER S.E.S.D. 38. ' CLEAR SPAN CONCRETE 78' R.C. ENTITLED "SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM (ENF) ABUTMENT: MITIGATION FACILITIES FOR THE PEABODY 0 .. ..........IRTMCMARG........... .. ............... .......................... ................................. ............ .............. .....(NOTE..EXIST....BRIDGE...IS--29.,0,±-y............................................................ ..................... ............................. FOR MI ....... AREA". REPORT INDICATES SEWER (TYP) THAT THE 2006 "MOTHERS DAY STORM" WAS A 50-YEAR STORM EVENT. CONCRETE : 2) BRIDGE DESIGN IS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL STRUCTURAL, FOOTINP..P�., ................................................... .................. ........................................................... ........................................................... ................................... :..... ..................... ............................. -2 ... .. ......................... -- ----------- --------------- GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDRAULIC EVALUATION. PILE CAP (TBD) : 3) BRIDGE DESIGN TO IMPROVE HYDRAULIC CONSTRICTION CR-ATED BY EXISTING BRIDGE CROSSING THE NORTH RIVER. -4 BRIDGE CROSS- SECTION- SCALE: 1"=4' POST WOODEN CAP 5,-0"± O.C. (TYP) RAILING 9= ADA COMPLAINT ADA COMPLAIINT 4X4 POST HAND RAILS HAND RAILS /-W/ RAILINGS ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 2 10/1/12 DETAILS. 50-0- E 1 6/20/12 WIDEN BRIDGE. ADD j-" 1* TH. TREX CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE PLAN CONCRETE CONCRETE DECKING No Date Description LANDING & ADA LANDING; & ADA EL 11.5 COMPLIANT RAMP ANGLE IRON 0 0 4x4 WOOD COMPLIANT RAMP POST Revisions N -7 7. 0 FCONNECTION 0 0 CAST-IN-PLACE L 1" TH. TREX CAST-IN-PLACE DEEP PT CONCRETE ABUTMENT \-BOTTOM OF BRIDGE 18* DEEP PRESSURE DECKING 100-YEAR 18- A GIRDERS EL 10.8 FLOOD_/ CONCRETE ABUTMENT TREATED GLULAM EL 11.5 ELEVATION 10.8 4 1. �-=LAM (TYP) FRAMING (LENGTH - 35 FEET) BTM. EL 10.8 EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE \4M4� 1 0 COMPACTED COMPACTED STRUCTURAL SECTION• I - BRIDGE SEC z UCTU sTRucTu7 EXISTING 4 FILL GRANITE FILL I SCALE: 11V=1*-O* ROBERT • BLOCK WALL Z H. 4 TOP EIL. 9.6 GRIFFIN BRIDGE ELEVAMN CIVIL r. .4,: SCALE- 11V=1'-O" #36686 4* 34!-21" Z- AZ '4 4 A MHW EL 5.0 CONCRETE CONCRETE FOOTING & WALL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOOTING & WALL RM � Gnain PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. FOR PERMITTING ONLY. DETAILED FRAMING PLANS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. Engineering Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE Beverfy, MA 01915 _PARKING W/ GUARDS---\ NORTH LOT DECK EL 11.5 RIVER CAN lo 5.0' 24.0' 7.0' 2.8'---;,' 5.0' Tek 978-927-5111 CONCRETE LANDING Fax., 978-927-5103 (MAX* 2% SLOPE) CONCRETE EL. 9.5 STEPS CONCRETE 2.2#±- MRM PROJECT ABUTMENT EXISTING GRANITE CONCRETE LANDING MANAGEMENT, LLC EXISTING GRANITE BLOCK WALL EL. 9.6± F CONCRETE CONCRETE LANDING '(MAX. 27. SLOPE) BLOCK WALL EL 9.6± RAMP UP (MAX. 59-0"rw ADA COMPLIANT A 2% SLOPE) EL. 9.5 SALEM, MA HAND RAILS (TYP) EL 11.5 CONCRETE LANDING CONCRETE (MAX. 2% SLOPE)- CONCRETE LANDING RAMP UP- 5 CONCRETE ADA COMPLIANT .0, EL 10.0 (MAX. 2% SLOP (1-/12-) EXISTING GRANITE A . EL 11.5 HAND RAILS (TYP) 0.3' BLOCK WALL EL 9.6± CONCRETE--j ABUTMENT DETAILS IV CONCRETE CONCRETE LANDING; STEPS -(MAX. 2% SLOPE) EL 9.75 5.0' 7.0' 7r 21.0' 5.0' BIKE BIKE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE NORTH SqgL% lw=4o, W/ GUARDS-- RIVER PAP7 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PA DECK EL 11.5 CAN NORTHERLY APPROACH Job No, 700 SOUTHERLY APPROACH • SCALE: 1"=4' C- 9 Fie Nam p/p/sA-b SCALE: 1"=4' DAtt' 12/20/11 2 I Z ...­­­­­'­ .... ...................... T EXISTING BOTTOM OF GRAD S EL I-BEAM .................... ........................................... ARMOR RO �OSED M 0 P P' SIDESLOPES ALONG .....................W _LL INGWA S .. ...... ............ ABUTMENT: A IT ()P. P Tk Pk A "nTI4 SLOPE .............. 0 110 T- v HISTORIC HIGH I \ _ - _ • WATER LINE NEW GRANITE CURB _ INLAID CONCRETE East AND CONCRETE \ I \ (HLDD LINE) CROSSWALK AND CURB CUT SIDEWALK AT EXIST. i — ADA RAMPS AT — — 1 MAIN ENTRACE CURB CUT 25' WIDE S.E.S.D. SEWER RO V i �.� / ` \ EASEMENT HISTORIC HIGH / G'��� vpOE� STOP SIGN I / MAP 16 LOT 3771 SB FNDD& HLD \ \ 1 WATER LINE 1 50 AND STOP / N/F \ I MAP 16 LOT 238 O 1 i .� S�OQ IBA�•�/ t, HARMONY GROVE CORP. N/F \ PR VdP g0 I 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC \ �.CPv81. �c./ T . .y LAND COURT PLAN 33813A �T — — • — — 2 NORM H RI VER -CANAL — TIDAL \ �AG��O WOOD & META 25 WIDE R1i Q�j / / / / BRIDG W/ 8" PIPE S.E.S.D. SEWER BPQi / DECK= EL. 9.2t EASEMENJ, PROPOSED VEHICLE %' - I 1 - - - / U I m \ m I Q HISTORIC HIGH \ L BRIDGE HISTORIC HIGH WATER LINE EXISTING \ =1 I_ X WATER LINE EXIST 10 W ItV- y�j BRIDGE \ H W I�W FSJ / Q=I Q= ABUTMENTS Q 3C 3: MAP 16 LOT 378 RAILROAD m N _ _ — — — — �— \ _\\�— U)1 — — — — — — . — — — _ — — — I N F ` - • - . - . _ CROSSING - - - - —I� V>t — — — — — _L — — — BVI — — — — . — . _ — — — — • — • — • — • — • — • — — • — PROPOSED —h / EASEMENT STOP SIGN ADAINLAIRAMOP AT \ —�— � T EXISTING LOADING CROSSWALKS & HARMONY GROVE CORP. AND STOP I gAY \ TRANSPORTATION I R.R. TRACKS AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN ENTRANCE ...... - BAR I PROPOSED SIN -I -I R.R. TRACKS - - - - - PROP. BIKE y, x L — _ — _ — — DUMPSTER 2 d �- GRANITE U c TTS '— AREA 1 ..� RACK 59 1, `CURBING I� /� SSACH `�� ST SIG I �— ` IVI BIT. CONC. PATH ��� •R � (TENANT PARKING) �► I - 2 .0' �`� t r. (TO REMAIN T I — — — a AL I EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL STORAGE SPACE) BULK TRASH I �►-o — \ E BLOCK RET I AREA EXISTING , STORAGE AREA 1 NDIC I _ — TOW _ I OFFICE 4 REPLACE WITHIN FENCED I � 5 � WALL ® BIT, g.6 f 1 NOR 7- BUILDING SIDEWALKS ENCLOSURE (p AMP = ` NC PAT L. y R� 7 ALONG Ivl-° 1 ml •, m SER GROVE ST. P PO B DIN #1 � �.` � � � _ � � � A�AL — T/D �RaNITF ego ONCRETE GE W/ 1 A �K W/ AR U ER � �� • - • � � � '• WA FENC ENCL ED 4 UNI I LL To STO GE AC A ( ) P OP ED 1 401.0 �� PROPOSED EL, 9 19 12 N — PR OSE D _ UI __ GRANITE BLOCk BRIDGEPEDES 9 6 f _ _ 3 / ADD ATABRE OF AREAS.LC 8 I CH B ING ERA CO RETE ti W GA qG ING #2 -� T - - I 4 TYP 2 TYP)IA _ _U I UN R NC WALL TOW c __ _ 2 9/10/12 HATCH BOUNDARYSALONG BLDG 2 & 3 L I PER UILDI TS I ATN EL. g 6f AND DRIVEWAY. UPDATE - - PR OSED P POS � _ TABLE. E RA IKE R K PAINTED - - - _ - (TYP 2 HIS RIC GH (TYP F 2 122.7 1 6/20/12 ADD MATCH LINES. REVISE #60. CROSSWALK I = _ PE UILDI ) AT LIN P BUI G) GROVE ST. LAYOUT. UPGRADE _ I (TYP U.N.O.) ;` _ - `~ P OPO - SIDEWALKS & CROSSWALKS. ST I 9• ° ED UIL _ _ ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. I ONE NCR W� GA GE G 3 ® -" 1 SHIFT GROVE ST. ENTRANCE. MAP 16 LOT 217 ` :^ SIDE (4 _U ND , WIDEN VEHICLE BRIDGE. I — — _ 1 ( TS) ISTD C ADD BIKE RACKS. N F v _ SARKES 1 I ?-_ TE INE 7,77777/ No Date Description v ° _ Revisions SILVER I - - MAP 16 LOT 218 _ _ - - BPD DISTRICT_ _ _ _ - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ — _ _ _ - - 10 _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - _ — - - _ _D _ST L — N F _ - - - - - - - _1— T r _ R T R2 DISTRICT 16. �— P -► — I (PUBLIC WAY FLORES (� - - - - t MAp 16 LOT MAP 1 1 I o�T #4 224 LOT 225 — — .� V J N/F #34 N/F OT 227 #2g ® SHED® I I IT MAP 16 SHED 1 30 I e2 ('+� of M INLAID CONCRETE o MAP 16 LOT 76 I MAP 16 LOT I CNLEY I TUC ER I N/fF I CROSSWALKS & ADA RAMPS STOP SIGN I x' 9cs I N/F I 223 I I LAWS;ON I — — — — — — rl�a ROBERT FLORES #2 T I #32 AT MAIN ENTRANCES BAR STOP I �" H. -{ �� N/F WALL Uj MAP 16 A&N REAL I I I GRIFFIN LOT 222 MAP 16 LOT 23 ESTATE OT 220 Y CIVIL N/F TRUST 1 N/F 1 _"� I �j MAP 16ALL I ` I,O #36686 N/F KOHLOFER DEMEULE MAP 16 MAP 16 LOT 2321 #2 I N/F (BST. CONC. PAIRIONG MAP 16 PROPOS I I BLANDEN m #44 I I I I ILON F3 " MYERS I #10 LOT 235 FENCE/ MAP 16 #48 I Q ! I I I I I 24 ROSS #20 I _.� I MAP 16 LOT 380 N/F / I #40 #38C #36 BIT. I #3Q MAP 16 LOT 2291 # j I / (8fASPl CES N IG MAP 233 16 LOT #6 LOT 234 N/F PArnSON J CONC. N/F #1 � ) CSWIGGIN PATTISON BASH q SPERIDAKOS ffGRANITE cuRe I BEA VER S TREE T I GRAN. Gnrun FN D - - BA[�11TE CURB 1 — - - ST (PUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE) � ' Englneenng — — — — — — — 1 — — Group, LLC 1 1 P.O Box 7061 1 1 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G j Beverly, MA 01915 NOTES: FE 1) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. i I Tel: 978-927-5111 a ZONING CHART Fax. 978-927-5103 0 REQUIRED = RESIDENTIAL SPACE PER PUD PROVIDED (14x,855 SF) MRM PROJECT MIN. LOT AREAS 60,000 SF 296,6519 SIF N MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100' 161 .;37' MANAGEMENT, LLC N MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 ' SALEM, MA MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5% CIO MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 49.5% MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1' MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6' MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0' MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15 OVERALL MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4• SITE LAYOUT co MIN. PARKING 1 .5 SP UNIT 212 215 FOOTNOTES: c LAN CD 1) REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. TABLE OF RESIDENTIAL SPACE �, 2) LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD LOT AREA RESIDENTIAL NON—RES. GRAPHIC SCALE Sc .gs 1'-40' SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. USE AREA USE AREA 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. 60 GROVE STREET 26,946 SF 0 SF 26,946 SF 0 20 +a 80 Iso 9 SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. 64 GROVE STREET 234,152 SF 142,056 SF 92,096 SF Job No•: 700 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 35,561 SF 4,799 SF 30,762 SF (,.IN FEIN , C- 3 (1 .5 SP/UNIT). 22 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE TOTAL 296,659 SF 146,855 SF 149,804 SF Fie Names p/p/sA-b E BUILDING. 1 inch = 40 ft ca �� 12/20/11 U N O a` a I H 1 \ GRAPHIC SCALE HISTORIC HIGH WATER LINE 1 40 0 20 40 e0 160 NEW GRANITE CURB _ ' I SB/DH rss INLAID CONCRETE EXIST. AND CONCRETE ._� ' _ / _ I (HLD LINE) CROSSWALK AND CURB CUT SIDEWALK AT EXIST. i _ • — � ADA RAMPS AT CURB CUT i / — ,— ' 7� ` ( IN FEET ) I MAIN ENTRACE /I / / \ I 1 inch = 40 ft. 25' WIDE I is S.E.S.D. SEWER 1 0� EASEMENT i G� DEQ �� STOP SIGN j MAP 16 LOT 377 FNDDH HLD \ \ ` I MAP 16 LOT 238 HISTORIC HIGH / 50' AND STOP / 1 N/F N F WATER LINE 0� Y S�QQ 'BAR / HARMONY GROVE CORP. I / \ VAP\ /i�1C Ag I 50 LAND O RT PLAN 33 13GRO'VE STREET REAL �ALLC \ NORM H RIVER CANAL TIDAL \ G / ,� Q�S�S"(FZ�j / / / WOOD & METAL \ I \ 25' WIDE �i i Q� / / / BRIDGJ W/ 8" PIPE S.E.S.D. SEWER DECK= EL. 9.2t EASEMENT ' PROPOSED I \ i 4 / / VEHICLERIDGE V 1 m \ m Q HISTORIC HIGH L — l B = 1 WATER HISTORIC LINEIGH EXISTING \ _ I= WATER LINE �I j RIDGE ` 0 W 1 CJ j �J EXIST - QWIQW ABUTMENTS Q=1aW 'MAP 16 LOT 378 — — _ — RAILROAD 1 — . — , ._ . _ , _ — — —\ _\\� — _ — — — — — — — — — — PROPOSED — IQ7 CROSSING - - - - • - - - - � - --�- -L , - • - , -- -- • T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - . _ . _ . _ .-._ , _ . - . _ . _ . _ - , - CROSSALKS CONCRETE 1 —10 HARMONY GROVE CORP. — EASEMENT STOP SIGN I I EXISTING LOADING ADA RAMP AT AND STOP gq y TRANSPOR TA TION I R.R. TRACKS AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN 1411111[ENTRANCE 00 — BAR 1 t�{} 1(nit lilts hl PROPOSED CKS _ _ R.R TRA — — — — — — — — — — — DUMPSTER 2 14 4— ..... .. . . PROP. BIKE GRANITE '► RACK CURBING - USE -�— AREA I r 59.1' SS H U _ -► I I AC sT stc & I BIT. CONC. PATH I (TENANT PARKING) _ t 1 1 M A _ - - - - 2 .0' STOP AR J-- `.\\ AL ,(TO REMAIN EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL �o STORAGE SPACE) }� BULK TRASH I �-►-o = IOC>< RET PROPosEDI AREA EXISTING STORAGE AREA ` 5� WgLL TO EL PEDESTRIAN OFFICE 4 REPLACE WITHIN FENCED I _ NDIC i �, , _ W _ BRIDGEI � \ _ BIT Cp .� 6 f 1 NO SIDEWALKS y ENCLOSURE AMP ® 9. BUILDING AN _ RTiL/ RI VE 7 ALONG _ R GROVE ST. s• . I \ -I— CANAL— RANIT FRONTAGE W/ 1 z �Io I P POS B DIN #1 1 T/Qgt E BLOCK CONCRETE _ _ RET AL ENCL ED W/ 4 R UNI U ER � � • � -� W ( ) I -� L TCW — — — Add 1&5 Harmony Grove I— TR H & CYC P pp E I _0' GRANIT E>!. 9 6� 4 10/1/12 Road to plan. Relocate Ped 1 m �I N 5 _ I TYP TOCH B A ING PR OSED _ GAD VI 40..0 _ E`BLOC RET —_—_ = — bridge. a e a es. ► ( B ERA CO RETfE �► w AG IIVG #2 � KP IOD 8 I 4 TYP 2 ITSND R I NC P,q� ALL TOW = E — — —= UPDATE RES. AREA CALC. M I PER UILDI �� hl L. 9 �' — 3 9/19/12 r PR OSED P POS sf ADD TABLE OF AREAS. n o - ERA IKE R K \ _ — — — PAINTED ` - (TYP 2 HIS RIC GH ; _ (TYP F 2 122.7 CROSSWALK I ' _ PE UILDI ) A LIN - P BUI G) 2 7/15/12 Hatch Res. Use; Adjust Res p OP Boundary alongBldg2 &3 and I I (TW U.N.O.) � L - •�,-�- � O • 1 S TO I .' I b w/ GED VI G _ _ �1driveway. Update a e. _ L NE RET Vl/A I I� ry3. ' =�_= -_,- • - SIDE R 4 _ GE ND 3 ® ADD MATCH ONES. REVISE #60 MAP 16 LOT 217 LL _ _ _ - I y ( ( V TS) ISTD C 1 1 6/20/12 GROVE ST. LAYOUT. UPGRADE SARKES _ i TE INE SIDEWALKS &ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. S. f #12 I N _ _ SHIFT GROVE ST. ENTRANCE. o WIDEN VEHICLE BRIDGE. ADD BIKE RACKS. — — — — — — #6 _ I 1 p V � D ST = I MAP 16 LOT 218 BPD DISTRICT I — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - _ _ _ - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- _ I SILVER L - _-� - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - __- - - - - - - -- .- - -- - - - -� ._. - _ R DIS IC _ j Description _ — NTF R2 DISTRICT 1 No Date Desc 'on (PUBLIC WAY FLORES 1 16. ' _ f- _ '►y' - - - - - - Z - - - - - - -t-- - — - 47. Revisions 4 MAFI 16 LOT MAP 16 o # 1224 LOT 225 MAP 16 `� I I N/F #34 N/F OT 227 #28 SHED SHED® 1 30 MAP 16 L T 76 MAP 16 LOT C NLEY TUCKER. INLAID CONCRETE = RESIDENTIAL SPACE I m M N F , �i ' 223 I N/F — _, I CROSSWALKS & ADA RAMPS STOP SIGN (146,855 SF) .. / #2 1 I #32 LAWSON I — — — — AT MAIN ENTRANCES AND STOP —� FLORES Q N/F I WALL MAP 16 A&N REAL I I I �� BAR Of LOT 222 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 23 I ALL MAP 16 N F TRUST N/F I v_, NOTES: LOT 220 v KOHLOFER DEMEULE MAP 16 LOT 2321 #2 I y,'� ROBH. ERT N I I MAP 16 N/F I B!7 CONC:. PARKING I n 03 GRIFFIN -+ 1 REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES I N/F - I I MAP 16 PROPOS 4 CIVIL AND LEGEND. BLANDEN m #44 I I I I ILOT 23 MYERS 1 I 10 LOT 235 FENCE/ I \ #30686 #48 Q ! I I I I I 24 ROSS #20 I 1:, I L �` I # MAP 16 MAP 16 OT 380 N/F I ; I I # r PAF ING MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 PATTISON t rr. , .z. #40 #38 #36 BIT. #30 IMAP 16 LOT 229 I (8fP CES) 233 #6 N/F N/F % i�' r ``' CONC. N/F #1 q CSWIGGIN PATTISON BASH — — _ — — — SPERIDAKOS _ lV GRANITE cuR6 I BEA VER' S TREE T I POST ZONING CHART REQUIRED PROVIDED (PUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE) I FND PER PUD _ ■ ■ MIN. LOT AREA5 60,000 SF 362,000 SF MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100 161.3- FOOTNOTES: Giful MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 " 1) REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. GRAPHIC SCALE — — S.E.S $ Englneenng MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5%; 2) LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD — — Group, LLC SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. 40 0 20 40 so 160 _ MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 40.6% _ i — _ 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. - � — —� � P.OBox 7061 MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1 " SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. _ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6" 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE ( IN FEET ) _ Beverly, MA 01915 MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0 1 inch = 40 ft — _ _ -- — W (1 .5 SP/UNIT). 22 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15')' BUILDING. — — W DEDE R1 D ICT _ — — — — — _ �— 25 _ _ �S APPROX. — —�— 1 Tel: 978-927-5111 2 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 5) LOT AREA INCLUDES #1 & #5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. _ SEWER PROPERTY LINES �� I —1� Fax: 978-927-5103 EASE — o M °' MIN. PARKING -- 215` —— - - - r ROAD _ - - - _ - - - — G vG_- - - - - _ MRM PROJECT MONY R - - AR � _ - — _ �_ — — _ AL � .-- I �'� MANAGEMENT, LLC _ -� - - — - — -- TIDAL N - - N RIVER CANAL 1 RI H SALEM, MA - — _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ — — __�_ = NO _ _ _ — — — _ MAP 16 LOT 378 _ N/F HARMONY GROVE Y T - - CORP. U TH O R I T , D►s rRlc - S (,.02 ACRES) TA TI O N A _ — — R2 pISTRICT 1 i Y TRANSPOR _ _ - - - I OVERALL E — _ r a _ - — — TTS BA - - -_ _ —�' I Im SITE LAYOUT — — SE — MAP 16 LOT 216 _� — — — _ _ _ 1 MAS _ _ _ ___ - - - - -— N/F i I PLAN a — - APPROX. _ _ _ — —_ _=� TABLE OF RESIDENTIAL SPACE RAYMOND 1 m Q1 m AL _ - PROPERTY LINES ENTRANCE LOT AREA RESIDENTIAL NON-RES. I D ' o TI D CORRIDOR I co r, USE AREA USE AREA o 0 CANAL ENTRANCE 910 OVERLAY 60 GROVE STREET 26,946 SF 0 SF 26,946 SF 1 S�= 1*=40' TH RIVER CORRIDOR �I� DISTRICT 64 GROVE STREET 234, NCR OVERLAY 152 SF 142,056 SF 92,096 SF DISTRICT 5I� 1 HARMONIY GROVE ROAD 20,909 SF 0 SF 20,909 SF Job No, 700 _ 3 HARMONIY GROVE ROAD 35,561 SF 4,799 SF 30,762 SF 1 Fie Names p/p/s/h_b C- 3 M _ _� ' S HARMOMY GROVE ROAD 44,432 SF 0 SF 44,432 SF I co TOTAL 362,000 SF 146,855 SF 215,145 SF I D� 12/20/11 U N O a n: 60+ Gmw-Ss - reb eel e S CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2014 OCT - I P 2* 11 October 1, 2014—Correction to September 11, 2014 letter ELLE t P flit CLE€tK. SALEM, hiA55. MRM Project Management, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 1, 3 & 5 Harmony Grove Road, 60 & 64 Grove Street—"Legacy Park Apartments" (Map 16, Lots 236, 237, 239, 377 & 378) CORRECTED Decision of Planning Board to grant request for extension of the previously approved Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review Decisions for an additional six (6)months. The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday,August 7,2014 to discuss your request for the approval of an request for extension of the previously approved Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review Decisions for an additional six (6)months. A letter submitted by Attorney Joseph Correnti, on behalf of MRM Project Management, LLC, on July 17, 2014,requests allowance to extend the permits granted by the Planning Board in a Decision date- stamped October 26, 2012, for an additional period of six(6)months. The petitioner states that the additional time is necessary in order to resolve a Department of Environmental Protection Appeal of the Conservation Commission Order of Conditions,which is holding up other state permitting needed for the project to begin. The requested six-month extension would commence on October 26, 2014, which is the expiration date of the current Decision. The requested extension would expire on April 26, 2015. The Planning Board voted six (6) in favor(Mr. Puleo—Chair, Ms. Yale, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Mr. Clarke, and Mr. Griset)and none (0)opposed, to grant the approval of the requested six-month extension of the Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review Decisions date October 26, 2012. This determination shall become part of the record for this project If you require further information,please contact Dana Menon, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning& Community Development at (978) 619-5685. Sincerely, NW.62° Charles Puleo, Chairman Salem Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1814 SEP I i P I 56 FILE # September 11, 2014 CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS, MRM Project Management, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 1, 3 & 5 Harmony Grove Road, 60 & 64 Grove Street—"Legacy Park Apartments" (Map 16, Lots 236, 237, 239, 377 & 378) Decision of Planning Board to grant request for extension of the previously approved Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review Decisions for an additional six (6) months. The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, August 7, 2014 to discuss your request for the approval of an request for extension of the previously approved Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review Decisions for an additional six (6) months. A letter submitted by Attorney Joseph Correnti, on behalf of MRM Project Management, LLC, on July 17, 2014,requests allowance to extend the permits granted by the Planning Board in a Decision date- stamped October 26, 2012, for an additional period of six (6)months. The petitioner states that the additional time is necessary in order to resolve a Department of Environmental Protection Appeal of the Conservation Commission Order of Conditions, which is holding up other state permitting needed for the project to begin. The requested six-month extension would commence on October 26, 2014, which is the expiration date of the current Decision. The requested extension would expire on April 26, 2014. The Planning Board voted six (6) in favor(Mr. Puleo—Chair, Ms. Yale, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Mr. Clarke, and Mr. Griset) and none (0) opposed,to grant the approval of the Insignificant Change request, approving the requested six-month extension of the Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review Decisions date October 26, 2012. This determination shall become part of the record for this project If you require further information,please contact Dana Menon, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning & Community Development at (978) 619-5685. Sincerely, Charles Puleo, Chairman Salem Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. 5ERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 July 16, 2014 RECEIVE Charles Puleo, Chairman City of Salem Planning Board JUIL 1 l 2014 120 Washington Street DEPT.of PLMNING& Salem, Massachusetts 01970 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Request for Extensions of Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Mr. Puleo: On behalf of the Applicant, MRM Project Management, LLC, I hereby request allowance to extend the above referenced Permits, which were granted by the Board in a Decision date-stamped October 26, 2012, for an additional period of six (6) months. The Petitioner intends to go forward with the project; however, additional time is necessary for the Applicant to resolve a DEP Appeal of the Conservation Commission Order of Conditions that is holding up other state permitting needed for the project to begin. Thus, allowing the Planning Board Permits to lapse would cause an extreme hardship for the Applicant. We would, therefore, respectfully request that the Board grant 6-month extensions to its Decisions referenced above. V ry truly yo se h C. Co nti JCC:dI cc: MRM Project Management, LLC (o o t Cfl y Application Grove �Z, i r i `1 f SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI . LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, 5R. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 976-741-4663 December 22, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP, Director City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Ms. Duncan: Enclosed for filing with the Planning Board please find the following: 1. Fifteen (15) copies of Application for Planned Unit Development Special Permit; 2. Fifteen (15) copies of Application for Site Plan Review; 3. Fifteen (15) copies of Project Narrative for PUD and Site Plan Review; 4. Fifteen (15) copies of Application for Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts Special Permit; 5. Fifteen (15) copies of Environmental Impact Statement dated December 20, 2012; 6. Fifteen (15) sets of Site Plans dated December 2011, prepared by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC; 7. Three (3) copies of Stormwater Management Plan dated December 2011, prepared by Griffin Engineering; and 8. Fifteen (15) copies of Traffic Impact and Access Study dated December 2011, prepared by Vanasse & Associates, Inc.; and 9. Check payable to the City of Salem in the amount of $12,275.00, representing the filing fee. Page Two December 22, 2011 This project is being presented as a Planned Unit Development, as it encompasses residential, commercial and passive recreational uses. The Planned Unit Development is located in the Business Park Development District and not more than 30 feet into the R2 District pursuant to Section 2.4 of the Ordinance. We are pleased to present these plans for the Board's review and approval. Very truly yours, l f Joseph C. Corre i Enclosures cc: client CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM M1 DEC 22 P 2 54 APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERMIT FILK SE # ALEM.MAS&. Location of Property: 3 Harmony Grove Road&60-64 Grove Street CITY CLERF Applicant: MRM Project Mana eg_rn Proposed Date of Hearing: Address/PO Box: PO Box 388 Date of Submittal: City, State,Zip Code: Beverly,MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 I. Project Description: a. Zoning district: BPD b. Square footage of parcel: 296,660 sf c. Square footage of structure(s): Residential: 135,768 gsf: Commercial: 17.000 gsf d. Square footage of footprint: Residential: 11.480 sf, Commercial: 6.864 sf e. No. of dwelling units(if applicable): 141 II. Additional Information: Information required includes this application and the following additional information. File one copy the application with City Clerk and fifteen (15) copies of the application and all , accompanying materials with the Planning Board (all copies must be stamped by City Clerk). a. A Site Plan at a scale of I"=40', (or as established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in Section IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: I. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction. 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas,walkways, and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways. 4. Location and type of external lighting. 5. Location,type, dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening. 6. Location and dimensions of utilities, gas,telephone,electrical communication, water, drainage, sewer and other waste disposal. 7. Location of snow removal areas. 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds, brooks, streams, wetlands, and marshes. n .. � c 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site,with two-foot contours. 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural style. b. A brief narrative, as requested by the Planning Board addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: 1. Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow,circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting 5. Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area c. An Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. III. Procedure: The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said . application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department,Department of Public Services,and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds, of the condition associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his succe r in title t al fate effects of same. .zo� ' gnature of Applicant Signature of Owner(at ached consent letter is also acceptable) Date Date FEE PAID: CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 201 He ft 54 CITY OF SALEM FILE # APPLICATION CITY CLERK.SALEM,MASS, SITE PLAN REVIEW Location of Property: 3 Harmony,grove Rd. & Applicant:MRM project Management, LLC 60-64 Grove Street Proposed Date of Hearing: Address/PO Box:PO Box 388 Date of Submittal: City, State,Zip Code: Beverly, MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 I. Project Description: a. Zoning district: Bp11 and R2 b. Square footage of parcel % 296,660 sf c. Square footage ofstmcture(s):Residential: 135,768 sf; Commercial: 17,000 sf d. Square footage of footprint:-Residential - 11 -R40 sf- Commercial , 6.864 sf e. No.of dwelling units(if applicable): 141 II. Additional Information: Information required includes this application,and the following additional information. File one copy of all information with City Clerk and fifteen (15)copies with the Planning Board (all copies must be stamped by City Clerk). a. A Site Plan at a scale of 1"=40',(or as established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in Section IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: 1. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction. 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas,walkways, and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways. 4. Location and type of external lighting. 5. Location,type, dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening. 6. Location and dimensions of utilities,gas,telephone,electrical communication,water,drainage,sewer and other waste disposal. 7. Location of snow removal areas. 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds,brooks, streams, wetlands, and marshes. 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site,with two-foot contours. 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural style b. A brief narrative,as requested by the Planning Board addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: 1. Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow,circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting 5. Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area c. An Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. III. Procedure: The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report.The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws.The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor in title to alleviate the effects of same. 5�41 U A OE�� zxo'wa Aig#FatoFe tf Applicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable) >/a i64/1 /d-/6// Date Date FEE PAID: Project Narrative In Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications For Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road 60 - 64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Introduction The project generally involves comprehensive redevelopment of the former Salem Oil & Grease factory site on Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road. As further described below, the redevelopment plans include construction of three multi-family residential buildings and re-use of an approximately 17,000 square-foot existing commercial office building. The redevelopment scheme will remove the many dilapidated structures from the property, restore vehicular access from Harmony Grove Road, and anchor the revitalization of the Mack Park neighborhood. 1. Buildings The project proposes construction of three residential buildings and reuse of an existing three-story office building. The residential buildings will each provide 47 units of one and two-bedroom apartments with four stories of living space. The residential buildings are designed with multiple gable roofs with varying siding types and colors - all designed to blend into the neighborhood by creating smaller massing elements similar in scale to nearby residential structures. Parking is provided in the basement of each building and adjacent to the buildings. The renovation of the existing office building on the opposite side of the canal is meant to honor the past by reusing the former Salem Oil & Grease administrative building while updating it to meet modern building code requirements. 2. Parking & Loading The residential buildings will each contain 33 spaces of parking within the Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 1 of 4 12/20/11 basement of the structures, supplemented with 116 spaces of surface parking, for a total of 215 spaces. The parking ratio for the residential units is 1.5 spaces per unit. Loading for the residential buildings will be limited to daytime and will occur at the front entrance to each building. The commercial building will have 24 spaces of surface level parking. This is equivalent to 1.4 spaces per 1,000 gsf of floor area. An existing loading dock at the rear of the commercial building will be maintained for loading purposes. 3. Traffic Flow and Circulation The main entrance for the residential buildings will be via an improved crossing of the North River Canal off of Harmony Grove Road. Secondary access and egress point will be from Grove Street. These access and egress locations, and the parking spaces adjacent to the buildings, create a longitudinal traffic pattern through the site. The garage parking for each residential building will have its own entrance point off of the longitudinal corridor, which will have the effect of distributing traffic movement. The commercial building will be accessed from Grove Street exclusively. 4. External Lighting The site lighting plan relies on "shoebox" style lighting fixtures to cast light downward onto the parking and pedestrian surfaces. These fixtures will be mounted on approximately 18-foot taillight standards. The topography of the site, which drops approximately 30-feet from Beaver Street to the North River canal, sets the light fixtures below the grade of nearby Beaver Street residences. The light fixtures include lenses to direct the "throw" of light and to minimize off-site dispersion. The exterior lighting circuits will be fitted with timers and ambient light sensors. Wall-packs or similar fixtures will be located at the secondary building entrances, and along the rear of the residential buildings. The wall-packs at the rear of the residential buildings are intended to cast light on the canal pathway. The wall packs will have shields and lenses to minimize unwanted light dispersion. Lamps in the lighting fixtures will be energy-efficient high-pressure sodium. 5. Landscaping and Screening A comprehensive landscaping plan is proposed to provide appropriate screening and natural amenities to the site. Approximately 2,700 plants will be placed at the site. The landscaping plan maximizes use of commercially-available native plant Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 2 of 4 12/20/11 species while providing year-round color. The main site entrance will include stone-masonry walls incorporating site signage and surrounded by evergreens and annual plantings. The site design intentionally maintains existing mature vegetation along the southwestern property boundary. This vegetation will provide natural screening of the site from the Beaver Street vicinity. The mature vegetation will be supplemented with plantings throughout the parking areas to fill-in specific locations. For example, lilac bushes will be planted above the proposed retaining wall along the main parking field. These shrubs will supplement the mature vegetation closer to the ground surface. The parking area surrounding the commercial building will be reconstructed with planting strips and beds around its perimeter. The planting beds proposed along Grove Street will significantly improve the appearance of this building. 6. Utilities Existing utility services to the site will be reused. The former industrial uses at the site required substantial water, sewer, and electricity services. The proposed uses will generally have lower demands on these utilities than the former uses required. All of the buildings will have fire-suppression sprinklers and modern alarm systems. 7. Snow Removal Adequate snow storage is provided at key locations adjacent to the parking lots throughout the site (see Landscape Plan). Should snow storage capacity prove to be inadequate, the Federated Companies will remove snow from the site. 8. Natural Area Protection and Enhancement The site has been substantially disturbed by centuries of industrial uses. The proposed project will not disturb any natural areas. The project will assist efforts to enhance the quality of the North River Canal. Redevelopment of this site will facilitate environmental improvements along the canal, removal of existing dilapidated structures, and improve public access along the canal. Development of the pathway along the canal will coordinate with long-term off-site improvements, and thereby enhance opportunities to enjoy the North River canal Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 3 of 4 12/20111 and improve bicycle and pedestrian transportation between Salem and Peabody. 9. Topography and Maintenance The topography of the site is characterized by generally flat land along the North River canal and along Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road, and a steep embankment along the southwestern edge of the property along Beaver Street. The proposed development takes advantage of this topographic change by keeping all of the proposed construction at the lower elevation, and maintaining the embankment with its mature vegetation along Beaver Street. This topographic change and mature vegetation provide a natural buffer which will assist in screening the project from the Beaver Street. Construction and maintenance of the site will be by the Federated Companies. Federated Companies has professional, experienced construction and property managers who understand the importance and value of properly maintained facilities. The buildings, parking areas, public-access walkway and the extensive landscaping plans included in this application will be professionally maintained. 10.Compatibility of Architecture with Surrounding Area The surrounding architecture is mainly industrial and residential. The Residential Buildings are designed with multiple gable roofs and three different siding types and colors all designed to minimize the size of the overall structures by creating smaller massing elements similar to the residential component of the area. The use of clapboards and shingles is in keeping with the residential design vocabulary evident throughout the city of Salem and New England. The renovation of the existing industrial building on the opposite side of the canal is meant to honor the past by maintaining the shell of the historic building while updating it to give the building a new sense of vitality for its contemporary purpose. The industrial building renovation will include new siding throughout and a glass exposure along Grove Street, which will clearly indicate the commercial nature of the building. Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 4 of 4 12/20/11 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS SPECIAL PERMIT Applicant: MRM Project Management, LLC Address: P.O. Box 388, Beverly, MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 Owner: Same as Applicant Location of Property:60-64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Project Description: Mixed-use: Residential & Commercial I. It has been determined by the Building Inspector that the above property lies in the following area(s): A. Wetlands District: Wetlands (v)Buffer Zone() B. Flood Hazard District: Zone A t4 ZoneA3 ()Zone V3 () II. Information required includes this application and the following additional information: (File one (1)copy of everything with the City Clerk and fifteen(15) copies with the Planning Board, all copies must be stamped by the City Clerk) A. A site plan at a scale of 1"equals 20' prepared by a registered land surveyor or registered professional engineer and showing at least the following: 1. Lot lines within which the development is proposed and the tie-in to the nearest road intersection. 2. The location,boundaries, and dimensions of each lot in question. 3. Two-foot(2') contours of the existing and proposed land surface. 4. Location of existing and proposed structures,water-courses, drainage and drainage easements,means of access,utilities, and sewer disposal facilities including leaching fields, if any. Proposed elevations should be noted. 5. Boundaries of all districts, areas and zones as noted in Section I. B. In the Wetlands District,a determination by a qualified engineer of the seasonal high water table,performed during the last two weeks of March or the first three weeks of April. A minimum of two percolation tests for each leaching area shall be performed. C. In cases of flood-proofing or pile construction, certification by a registered professional engineer or architect as to the elevation of flood-proofing measures and as to compliance with the applicable sections of the Massachusetts State Building Code concerned with flood depths,pressures velocities, impact and uplift forces, and other factors associated with the base flood. Where specific methods or techniques have been previously certified,the Planning Board may waive this requirement. D. A list of Federal, State, and other local permits required by the applicant. E. Descriptions relative to all conditions applicable in Section III below. III. Conditions(Complete those sections indicated(x)by the Building Inspector) In the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts no structure or building,including pipes and wells, shall be erected,constructed, substantially improved, enlarged, or otherwise created or moved,no area shall be paved; no earth or other material shall be stored, dumped, used as fill, excavated, or transferred; and no sediment shall be caused to be discharged from or onto a wetland,unless all the following conditions are found to exist as part of the granting of a Special Permit by the Planning Board(Use additional pages if necessary) A. All Districts: () 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying District in which the land is located. Yes xxx No (x)2. There is adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site, and in relation to adjacent streets and property,particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent Iot(s) caused by either overspill from water bodies or high runoff. Yes, Sea attached sheet. ()o 3. Utilities, including gas, electricity, fuel, water, and sewage disposal, shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, short-circuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. (Provide details) Yes, See attached sheet. ( 4. The cumulative effect of the proposed development or use, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development and uses will not obstruct or divert flood flow; substantially reduce natural flood-water storage capacity in the local drainage area; destroy valuable habitat for wildlife including fisheries or shellfisheries; adversely affect groundwater resources or increase storm water run-off velocity so that water levels on other land are substantially raised or the danger from flooding increased. Yes, See attached sheet. B. Wetlands District: (x) 1. The proposed development or use shall not include the storage of salt,chemicals, petroleum products or other contaminating substances or discharge of any polluting liquids or materials into streams,brooks or wetlands. (The polluting effects of substances on the Wetlands are to be gauged by the"Rules and Regulations for the Establishment of Minimum Water Quality Standards and for the Protection of the Quality and Value of Water Resources"of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.) Yes. No chemicals or salt storage is proposed Buildings will be heated by natural gas. Stormwater discharges will comply with DEP Stormwater Management Standards. (t)2. The floor level of areas to be occupied by human beings as living or work space shall be four(4)feet or more above the seasonal high water table. Yes Sep. project Site Plan First floor is more than Vaboyp rh adjacent grade at the rear of each building ([ 3. If the basement floor level is below the seasonal high water table and affords the possibility of human occupancy at some future date, although not originally intended, adequate perimeter drainage and foundation shall be installed to withstand the effect of pressure and seepage. Furnace and utilities are to be protected from the effects of leaching. (Provide details) ()Applies a Does not Apply (� 4. If the lot is to be served by an on lot septic system,the leaching area designed for use, as well as a reserved area for future expansion or total future use, shall be plotted with dimensions on the site plan, and the leaching areas shall not be constructed where the seasonal high water table is less than 4 feet below the bottom of the leaching areas. ()Applies (See site plan) 0 Does not apply C. Flood Hazard District(all zones): X3 1. The floor of the basement, or if none,the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for residential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level. The basement floors for the proposed residential buildings are all above the 100-year flood level (elevation 10.8) 2. The floor of the basement, or if none, the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for nonresidential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level or the structures shall be flood-proofed to that level in compliance with the applicable requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Flood-proofing measures shall 1 insure that the structure is watertight and that structural components have the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. The approximately 100-year commercial building (no. 60 Grove Street) has a basement that is below the 100-year flood level. Holes in the foundation walls allow flood waters to enter and receed The proposed building improvements will bring the building into compliance with current codes D. Flood Hazard District. Coastal High Hazard Area(Zone V3): () 1.New structures or substantial improvements shall be located landward of the reach of Mean High Tide. ()2.New structures or substantial improvements shall be elevated on adequately anchored pilings or columns, and securely anchored to such pilings or columns so that the lowest portion of the structural members of the lowest floor(excluding the pilings or columns) is elevated to or above the 100 year flood level. Space below the lowest floor shall be free of fixed obstruction. (Provide details) () 3. The support of new structures or substantial improvements shall not be, in whole or in part, by the use of fill. (Provide details) IV. Procedure The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health, Conservation Commission and Fire Prevention Officer who may,at their discretion,investigate the application and report in writing their recommendations to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Conservation Commission and Fire Prevention Officer or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report.The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports,in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws.The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the wetland or flood hazard conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the Detitioner or his successor in title to al ' to the eflectyof s ignature of-Applicant— of caner a ched consent letter is also acceptable) Date Date FEE PAID: All Districts III.A.2—In the event of an extreme storm event(100-year storm)the adjacent North River could overflow its banks and flow onto low-lying portions of the subject properties. Likewise,during such flooding a portion of the proposed driveway from Harmony Grove Road could be flooded with up to a foot of water. The proposed residential buildings and associated parking areas are located above the 100-year flood elevation. Alternative egress above the 100-year flood elevation is available for vehicles and pedestrians via Grove Street. The parking lot for the commercial building at 60 Grove Street is also susceptible to flooding. This may require that the building close down during extreme storm events. The habitable working space within the building is all located above the base flood elevation. The flooding conditions on the existing 60 Grove Street commercial property are pre-existing conditions and will not be affected by the proposed redevelopment. III.A.3—Existing utilities for the 60 Grove Street commercial building will be reused. New utilities are proposed for the residential buildings at 64 Grove Street. All new utilities will be located above or outside the flood zone except for a few driveway lights which will require underground electrical wires below the flood elevation. Proper construction techniques(i.e.sealed conduits or submersible cables) will be used to limit potential flood damage. III.A.4—The proposed project will not create new obstructions to or divert flood flows. Removing buildings along the edge of the canal will increase flood-water conveyance and storage capacity..No activities are proposed with the North River canal,so the project will have no effect on fisheries or shellfisheries. The site currently does not provide valuable wildlife habitat due to the industrial uses and buildings which cover the property. Therefore,the proposed site redevelopment work is not expected to significantly affect valuable wildlife habitat. A stormwater management system, designed in compliance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Standards,will be installed to provide adequate groundwater recharge. Post- development stormwater runoff will be similar to existing flow rates. Because this site is located adjacent to the tidal North River canal, is a low-lying parcel only slightly above the 100-year flood elevation,and will be served by a modern stormwater management system,stormwater runoff from the site will not affect water levels on other properties. , ✓ Environmental Impact Statement In Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications For Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road 60 - 64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Introduction This Environmental Impact Statement discusses the proposed project in response to the topics presented in Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. For the reviewer's convenience, the topics are discussed in the order presented in the regulations. In the text below, italics represent the topic as provided in the regulations and the response follows the word "Response:" 1.0 Natural Environment 1.1 Air. 1.1.a Describe possible sources and duration of significant amounts of odors, smoke and dust. Response: There are no known sources of odors or smoke anticipated with the proposed project. Dust could be generated during the construction process, but will be minimized as outlined in 1.1.b. 1.1.b Describe precaution to be taken to eliminate or minimize the adverse environmental effects of the smoke, dust or odors generated. Response: Dust generated during construction will be minimized by the application of water and calcium chloride to travelled portions of the site. Dust control will depend on weather conditions and the construction activities ongoing at the time. Calcium chloride use will be minimized along the North River canal, to avoid potential water quality impacts. 1.1.c Describe the relationship of the location of the subdivision and prevailing wind pattems to nearby residences, businesses, recreation area, and other public areas. Legacy Park Apartments Page 1 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: Long term meteorological records suggest that prevailing winds are generally from the northwest during winter months and from the west-southwest during the summer months. Downwind properties in the winter months support primarily commercial and residential land uses; in the summer months commercial uses and the Harmony Grove Cemetery are downwind. The proposed residential and office uses at this site are unlikely to create odorous or noxious conditions that could migrate downwind. 1.1.d If incineration of refuse is proposed for the subdivision, describe the effects resultant emissions will have on air quality in the area. Include proof that the incinerator complies with the latest local and state standards. Response: Standard commercial refuse and recyclables collection will be employed at the site. The refuse and recyclables hauler will be required to bring these materials to solid waste handling facilities complying with the applicable environmental requirements of the state the facility is located within. 1.2 Land 1.2.a Describe the existing general physical conditions of the site, including existing use, general topography, unusual geologic formations and soils, and how the project will effect these features. Response: The site is approximately 6.8 acres in size and is generally flat, with an embankment sloping up to Beaver Street on its southwestern side. The elevation change between Beaver Street and the site is approximately 30 feet. The sloped embankment contains some mature vegetation and is heavily littered with trash and debris apparently deposited from abutting properties. Most of the site is located above the 100-year flood elevation (elevation 10.8 NGVD datum). The portion of the site between the railroad tracks and at the main entrance off Harmony Grove Road varies in elevation from approximately 8.5 to 11 feet NGVD; the existing parking areas along Grove Street are constructed at approximately elevation 9.5 to 11 feet NGVD. The site is currently vacant. It was owned and operated by the Salem Oil & Grease Company for approximately 90 years until 2002. The site is developed with multiple industrial buildings with associated access driveways, parking lots, and material storage areas. The site is generally "run-down"with many degraded surfaces and debris scattered about the landscape. The site is bisected by the tidal North River Canal. Portions of the site along the North River Canal were at one timeart of the tidal Mill Pond an impoundment P � P created by a dam located approximately at Grove Street. The dam was used to power industrial activity at and adjacent to the site. A variety of industrial activities have occurred at the site from the 1700's to today. Site soils are mapped by the United States Department of Agriculture —Soil Legacy Park Apartments Page 2 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove Conservation Service maps as being Urban Land. This mapping unit indicates that the soils have been significantly altered or obscured by urban works and structures. The portions of the site within the historical Mill Pond are filled lands. A limited amount of soil boring data is available from previous construction projects at the site. These generally indicate that in the central portion of the site, medium and fine sands and inorganic silts exist to approximately elevation -25 feet and overlay approximately 20 to 25 feet or more of medium stiff silty clay. Soils appear to be primarily sand and gravel closer to Beaver Street. The available soil boring data generally suggests that conventional construction techniques will be suitable for the construction project. As with any urban site with a limited geotechnical data set, soil conditions may vary causing the need to adapt construction techniques to the conditions occurring at the time of construction. The general condition of the existing buildings at and in the vicinity of the site suggest that conventional construction techniques can be effectively employed at the site. 1.2.b Describe any limitations on proposed project caused by subsurface soil and water conditions, and methods to be used to overcome them. Response: As stated above, conventional construction techniques are expected to be applicable to most of the site. The presence of fill along the North River Canal may require that portions of the buildings be supported by piles or other deep foundation methods extending through the fill into more competent soils below. Water conditions are unlikely to present a significant impediment to the proposed construction. The buildings will be constructed above grade with no basements. Utility installations may encounter water during construction and will be handled in appropriate manners Due to the past industrial activities at the site, a comprehensive site assessment is being undertaken by a Licensed Site Professional (LSP). Appropriate environmental remediation work and worker-safety precautions will be undertaken during construction based on the LSP's findings. 1.2.c Describe procedures and findings of percolation tests conducted on the site. Response: Percolation tests are not applicable to this project, which will be connected to an existing municipal sewer in Grove Street. Based on the soil conditions noted above, percolation rates would be expected to be moderate to rapid. 1.2.d Describe the types and amounts of land which will be permanently affected by construction of the subdivision. Response: All three parcels will be affected by the proposed construction. The 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel will be traversed with a new site access bridge and Legacy Park Apartments Page 3 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove roadway, and landscape work will occur along this corridor. The disturbance of 3 Harmony Grove Road will be approximately 25% of the 35,561 sf parcel. At the 60 Grove Street parcel, essentially all of the 26,946 sf parcel will be affected by the proposed improvements. The existing office building on this parcel will remain intact, but will be thoroughly renovated throughout. The barrel storage building will be removed, the parking area reconstructed, and the site landscaped. At the approximately 5.4 acre 64 Grove Street parcel, approximately one acre of land will remain undisturbed. This is primarily the strip of land along the southwest boundary of the parcel (the Beaver Street side) in which existing mature vegetation will be maintained. 1.2.e Describe proposed rough grading plans. Response: On the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel, a small amount of regrading will occur to accommodate the new bridge over the North River Canal. At the 60 Grove Street parcel, rough grades will not change. At the 64 Grove Street parcel, a combination of fill placement along the southwest face of the proposed buildings and cutting into the existing embankment will occur to provide a flat parking area at approximately the first floor level. Concrete block retaining walls are proposed on the uphill side of the parking lot to minimize disturbance of the existing embankment and its mature vegetation. Within the building footprints, the parking level will be approximately 10 feet below the first floor elevation. The parking level will be at approximately the same grade as the proposed landscaping and bike path along the North River canal. In the northwestern corner of the site existing soils will be regraded to provide an approximately flat parking area near the railroad tracks. 1.21 Describe location and extent of existing marshes, wetlands, or seasonal wet areas and any proposed alteration. Response: The North River Canal transects the project site. Between the 60 & 64 Grove Street parcels, the canal is confined by granite block retaining walls. The canal transects the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel and is confined by sloping embankments in this parcel. No alteration of wetland areas will be necessary for the project with the exception of minor or temporary disturbances necessary to install a new bridge, utilities and roadway across the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel: 1.3 Water and Wetlands 1.3.a Evaluate how and to what extent the project will affect the quality and quantity of any existing or potential public or private water supply, including watersheds, reservoirs and groundwater. Legacy Park Apartments Page 4 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove L Response: Due to the industrial history of this portion of Salem and the close proximity of the site to saline water bodies, this site has no potential use as a public or private water supply. Site redevelopment will therefore not directly benefit potential water supplies. Redevelopment may significantly improve groundwater quality at the site, by facilitating environmental cleanup work under the direction of the Licensed Site Professional. Groundwater quality improvements will also improve quality in the North River Canal, since groundwater at the site discharges to the canal. The proposed project includes a new drainage system that is designed to be in complete compliance with the applicable standards of the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Guidelines. Stormwater runoff from the proposed parking lots will be treated prior to being discharged. Roof runoff from the proposed buildings will also be captured and infiltrated to provide groundwater recharge in accordance with the standards. These stormwater management improvements will also benefit water quality in the North River Canal. 1.3.b Describe the methods to be used during construction to control erosion and sedimentation and siltation including use of sediment basins and type of mulching, matting, or temporary vegetation; approximate size and location of land to be cleared at any given time and length of time to exposure; covering of soil stockpiles, and other control methods used. Evaluate effectiveness of proposed methods on the site and on the surrounding areas. Response: A comprehensive erosion control program will be undertaken during construction. Haybales and silt fence will be installed along the downgradient edge of the proposed work area as approved by the local Conservation Commission. A construction entrance will also be installed at the Grove Street entrance and will be maintained until the pavement binder course is installed... Silt sacks will be installed and maintained in the vicinity of the proposed construction entrance. Only the portion of land that is affected by the redevelopment of the site will be cleared. To help prevent off-site erosion, disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched as soon as practicable. Proposed slopes steeper than 3h:1v shall be stabilized with erosion control matting and seeded. Temporary stockpiles of existing on-site soil materials will be created during construction. Stockpiles will be encircled with erosion control barriers and covered. Additional earth materials received for construction are expected to be ordered as needed and installed upon arrival. 1.3.c Describe the permanent methods to be used to control erosion and sedimentation. Include description of: Legacy Park Apartments Page 5 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 1.3.c.1 - any areas subject to flooding or ponding; Response: All areas located within the 100-year flood zone will be stabilized with either bituminous pavement or landscaping. No erosion is anticipated. 1.3.c.2-proposed surface drainage system, Response: A conventional piped drainage system is proposed. Stormwater runoff from all paved surfaces will be directed to and treated by catchbasins or other treatment devices prior to being discharged to the North River Canal. Each catchbasin will be equipped with a 4-foot deep sump and hood to prevent sediments, oils and floatable trash from discharging directly into the river. Most of the paved parking area will also be treated by Stormcepter pretreatment units. Stormwater from the roofs of the proposed buildings will be captured and conveyed to infiltration beds for groundwater recharge. During extreme storm events, surplus roof runoff will flow into the on-site drainage system. 1.3.c.3-proposed land grading and permanent vegetation cover, Response: The proposed land regrading is shown on the project Grading and Drainage Plan. Regraded areas will be stabilized as soon as practicable with a well vegetated grass surface or landscaped planting bed. 1.3.c.4 - methods to be used to protect existing vegetation, Response: The clearing limit will be restricted to the area necessary to construct the proposed project. Erosion control barriers or other methods of demarcation (i.e. snow fence, flagging, etc.) will to be set along the clearing limit at the beginning of construction. Erosion control barriers will not be removed until work has been completed and stabilized. 1.3.c.5- the relationship of the development to the topography; Response: The proposed development requires retaining walls and regrading along the southerly portion of the project site. The remaining topography will remain approximately the same as current conditions. All areas disturbed during construction will be stabilized with vegetation or finish surfaces as soon as practicable. 1.3.c.6- any existing or proposed alterations of shorelines, marshes or seasonal wet areas, Response: None 1.3.c.7- any existing or proposed flood control or wetland easements; Response: None Legacy Park Apartments Page 6 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 1.3.c:8-estimated increase of peak runoff caused by altered surface conditions, and methods to be used to return water to the soils. Response: Drainage calculations have been performed and are separately provided. Future peak stormwater runoff rates are similar to existing conditions. Groundwater recharge is proposed through a large infiltration bed located beneath parking areas. 1.3.d Discuss the probability that the project will increase pollution or turbidity levels within receiving waterway and the precautions to be taken to minimize the effects. Response: The project is likely to reduce pollution and turbidity levels within the North River Canal. The proposed project includes conducting environmental clean-up work to address contamination remaining from past industrial uses. The proposed project will provide stable surfaces and clean impervious surfaces routed through a modern drainage system. Under current conditions, there are little if any stormwater management controls at the site. The placement of deep sump catch basins, stormwater pretreatment devices, and infiltration beds at the site will reduce the amount of pollutants that are conveyed from the project site during storm events. 1.3.e Discuss the project's effect on the waterway's aquatic biota and use as habitats. Response: For reasons specified above, the project is likely to improve water quality in the North River Canal. This will in turn improve aquatic habitat and its ability to support a variety of biota 1.3.f Discuss the project's effects on groundwater quality and supply and efforts to recharge groundwater supplies. Response: As discussed above, the proposed project is likely to improve groundwater quality at the site. The construction of groundwater recharge structures below parking areas are intended to recharge groundwater supplies so that on an annual basis, groundwater recharge is approximately equal to pre- development conditions. 1.3.g Discuss what effect the project will have on increasing the incidence of flooding, including areas outside the subdivision. Response: Drainage calculations have been performed for the proposed project. Due to the extensive stormwater management improvements proposed for the site, the estimated peak stormwater runoff rates following construction will be similar to existing conditions. Therefore, no increase in flooding incidences is anticipated due to the project. 1.3.h Discuss the effect of the proposed sewerage disposal methods on surface and groundwater supplies and quality. Legacy Park Apartments Page 7 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: No impacts to groundwater supplies from the proposed sewerage system are expected. Sewage will be conveyed through sealed pipes and structures to the municipal sewer system in Grove Street. 1.4 Enem 1.4.a Describe the types and increased quantity of energy required to serve the needs of the project residents. Response: The estimated power annual power consumption is approximately: Residential Buildings Commercial Building Heating Load: 6,500 MMBtu 500 MMBtu Electrical Load: 4,000 MMBtu 450 MMBtu 1.4.b Indicate what the sources of this energy will be. Response: Natural gas will be used for heating. Electricity will be used for lights, appliances, and cooling. Adequate utilities.are available adjacent to the site. 1.5 Noise 1.5.a Describe the time, duration and types of noises generated by the project, both during and after construction. Response: During the construction phase, construction activities are expected to begin at approximately 7:00 AM and be completed by 6:00 PM. Moderate noise levels associated with the construction equipment is anticipated. During the building demolition phase, a wrecking ball will be likely employed. During the foundation construction phase, noise associated with the installation of pile foundation supports may occur leg. pile driving). Generally, soil conditions appear to not require blasting, so use of that construction technique during this project should be minimal. During the operational phase, noise levels are not expected to be significant. Multifamily residential developments generally generate little noise. 1.5.b Discuss what effect these noises will have on both humans and wildlife. Response: During the construction phase, OSHA noise level requirements will be satisfied in the work zones. Beyond the work zones, noise levels are expected to drop to moderate levels prior to reaching neighboring housing units. By maintaining mature vegetation along Beaver Street, noise impacts are minimized. The presence of existing buildings and structures on the east side of the side will block noises emanating in this direction. Legacy Park Apartments Page 8 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove The construction activities will create noise levels noticeable to humans and wildlife. However, as noted above, the noise levels are expected to be typical of residential construction projects, and of a temporary nature. The post- construction noise associated with the multi-family dwellings is not expected to be significant. 1.5.c Describe the controls which will be used to eliminate or minimize the effects of these noises. Response: Construction noise effects will be minimized by 1) the use of mufflers on all construction equipment, 2) providing temporary power to the worksite so gas powered generators are not required, and 3) limiting the work hours as noted above. Maintaining existing mature vegetation to the maximum extent practicable between the work area and the off-site residences, as proposed by the Applicant, will minimize off-site noise levels. 1.6 Local Flora and Fauna 1.6.a Discuss the project's effects on land-based ecosystems, such as the indigenous wildlife, stream bank cover, and vegetal or wooded growth. Response: The project will redevelop land that has been substantially altered by previous activities at the site. The existing land surfaces are degraded; wildlife activity at the site is minimal. Disturbance of stream bank cover and the wooded growth along the perimeter of the property has been minimized. 1.6.b Describe proposed types and amounts of vegetative cover. Response: All cleared and disturbed areas, except buildings and hardscape surfaces, are to be covered with planting beds or loam and seed. A Landscaping Plan has been prepared by a landscape architect indicating placement of approximately 2,700 trees, shrubs and perennials to be planted at the project site. 1.6.c Discuss the existence of rare or endangered plant, wildlife or fish species in the project area. Response: There are no known rare or endangered plant, wildlife or fish species in the project area. Efforts are underway to improve Rainbow Smelt spawning in the North River. The water quality improvements associated with site redevelopment will directly benefit these efforts. 2.0 Man-Made Environment 2.1 Land use 2.1.a Describe how the proposed project conforms with the growth plans for the area and the city in general. Legacy Park Apartments Page 9 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: In 2003 the City prepared the North River Canal Corridor (NRCC) plan, which addressed land southeast of the project site. Although the NRCC plan did not directly address the subject site, the proposed project is consistent with the plan mission in that it is rehabilitating an abandoned and dilapidated Brownfield site and creating a neighborhood use adjacent to the existing residential uses. The commercial component of the project integrates well with its immediately abutting land uses. The NRCC plans provide a framework for new growth and development in the North River area primarily consisting of mixed uses, which is consistent with this proposal. The proposed project conforms to other growth plans of the city because it provides improvements along an existing entrance corridor (Harmony Grove Road, Grove Street, etc. . Also, the proposed project provides a bike path along the canals edge which is generally consistent with the 1996 City of Salem Master Plan. 2.1.b Describe land uses adjacent to the project. Response: The Beaver Street and Silver Street residential neighborhoods are located to the south and west of the project site. The Harmony Grove Cemetery is located to the north, along the northerly side of Harmony Grove Road. Commercial and industrial buildings are located to the northeast along both sides of Grove Street. To the east of the site, a mixed-use development (at 28 Goodhue Street) was recently permitted. The 28 Goodhue Street project contained commercial space on the first floor level and 44 units of residential condominiums on the upper three levels. 2.1.c Describe any existing or proposed public or common recreational or open areas within the subdivision. Response: A bike path with seating areas is proposed along the southerly edge of the canal. Public bike path access during daylight hours is proposed. 2.1.d Discuss the site's proximity to transportation, shopping, educational facilities, recreational facilities, etc. Response: Public Transportation — MBTA Bus Route 465, stop at the intersection of Nicholas and Boston Street (0.1 mi.), and Salem Train Station (1 mi.). Shopping —Walgreens Pharmacy (0.2 mi.); Peabody Stop & Shop (0.5 mi.); and North Shore Mall (2.5 mi.). Educational Facilities—Salem High School (1.0 mi.); Collins Middle School (0.6 mi.); Bates Elementary School (1.1 mi.); and Salem Public Library (0.7 mi.). Recreational Facilities—Salem Golf Course (1.3 mi.); Mack Park (0.1 mi.); and Gallows Hill Park (0.5 mi.). Legacy Park Apartments Page 10 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove L 2.2 Density 2.2.a Provide a tabulation of proposed buildings by type, size (number of bedrooms, floor area), ground coverage, and a summary showing the percentage of the tract to be occupied by buildings, parking and other paved vehicular areas, and usable open space. Response: Table 2.2: Summary of Site Development Description / Location: 64 Gove Street 60 Grove Street Total Site Land Use Multi-Family Commercial Mixed Residential Building Number of Buildings 3 1 4 Number of Units/Building 47 TBD -- Number of Res. Units 141 — 141 Number of Bedrooms 3 @ 83 — 249 Number of Stories 4 3 -- Building Footprint 3 @ 11,480 SF 6,864 SF 41,304 SF Gross Floor Area 3 @ 45,256 SF 17,000 +/- SF 152,768 +/- SF Lot Area - 234,152 SF 26,659 SF 296,659 SF Building Coverage 14.7% 25.7% 13.9% Pavement Coverage 30.4% 1 44.9% 29.50/6 Open Space 1 54.9% 1 — Includes 3 Harmony Grove Road 2.3 Zoning 2.3.a Indicate the zoning designations for the site and adjacent areas. Response: Site: Residential Two-Family District (R2) Business Park Development District (BPD) Wetland and Flood Hazard Overlay District (WFHOD) Entrance Corridor Overlay District (ECOD) Adjacent: Residential One-Family District (R1) North River Canal Corridor (NRCC) Industrial (1) 2.4 Architecture 2.4.a Describe the architectural and landscaping techniques which will be used to blend the structures with the surrounding area. Response: The exterior facades of the proposed residential building will have the Legacy Park Apartments Page 11 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove appearance of traditional wood siding and shingles, consistent with the adjacent residential areas. The project site will be well landscaped with lawns and planting beds (approximately 2,700 trees, shrubs, and perennials), and will maintain existing mature vegetation along Beaver Street. 2.4.b Discuss the heights of the structures in relation to the surrounding area. Response: The proposed residential buildings are 4-stories tall along their front (southerly) side and 5-stories tall along their rear (northerly/river) side. Parking is proposed in the lower level of the buildings. The ridge elevation of the proposed buildings will be approximately the same as the ridge elevations of the two-story residential buildings along Beaver Street. 2.4.c Discuss the project's visual impact and possible interference with natural views. Response: The project will significantly improve ve natural views at and near the site. The industrial history of the site is clearly apparent in the existing dilapated buildings, abandoned roadways and storage areas, and crumbling facades. The .new buildings and landscaping, which maximize use of native species, will provide year-round color and rid this section of Salem of the existing eyesores. The North River Canal bike path will provide scenic opportunities to enjoy the ongoing North River restoration efforts. 2.4.d .Describe type of construction building materials used, location of common areas, location and type of service facilities (laundry, trash, garbage disposal). Response: The proposed residential buildings will generally be wood and steel framed structures with weather-resistant clapboard and shingle exteriors. Common parking facilities will be provided in the lower level of the apartment . buildings and on the project site. The landscaped areas surrounding the buildings and along the North River Canal are designated as common areas for recreational activities. Individual laundry facilities will be provided in each apartment unit; common refuse and recyclable disposal areas will be provided in each building. 2.5 Historic Buildings, Historical Sites and Archeological Sites 2.5.a Indicate location and significance of any historic buildings or sites on or adjacent to the project. Response: None 3.0 Public Facilities 3.1 Water Supply, Flow. Pressure and Distribution. 3.1.a Describe the groundwater and/or surface water supply to be used. Legacy Park Apartments Page 12 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove Response: Municipal water will be used. Salem obtains water from surface water supplies (Wenham Lake & Ipswich River). 3.1.b Discuss the demands of the project for consumption and fire protection. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, the demand for domestic water consumption is estimated to be approximately 25,700 gallons/day. The peak demand for fire protection for any on-site building is estimated to be approximately 1,500 gallons per minute. The buildings will be equipped with fire suppression sprinklers and hard-wired fire alarm systems. 3.2 Sanitary Seweraqe Connection, Distribution and Facilities. 3.2.a Discuss the quantity and type of sewage which will be generated by the project. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, the estimated sewage generation by the proposed project is approximately 28,500 gallons/day. 3.2.b Describe the method of sewage which will be generated by the project. Response: Domestic sanitary sewage. 3.3 Storm Drainage Facilities 3.3.a Describe where connection to the City system is proposed. Response: There is no proposed connection to a municipal drainage system. The project will drain to the North River Canal through a modern stormwater management system. 3.4 Disposition of Stormwater 3.4.a Indicate the location of all proposed outfalls. Response: Stormwater runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces will be captured, treated, and discharged to the North River Canal at four outfall locations as shown on Sheet C-4: One outfall is located near the Grove Street Bridge, one at the westerly end of the renovated commercial building, one near the railroad bridge, and the fourth near the proposed vehicle bridge. Drainage patterns are generally similar to existing conditions. 3.4.b Describe the effect of the outfalls and their discharge on the receiving waters, i.e., increased flows, pollution etc. Response: As described above, the proposed project is expected to improve Legacy Park Apartments Page 13 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove receiving water quality and lessen pollutant discharges from the site. Proposed stormwater discharge rates will be similar to existing conditions. No flooding impacts are anticipated due to site redevelopment. 3.4.c. Discuss the quantity of stomtwater to be discharged. Response: The pre- and post-development volumes of stormwater runoff from the project site are as follows: 2-year 10-year 25- ear 100-year— Pre-Development 00- earPre-Develo ment 61,288 103,026 130,748 165,158 Post-Develop ment 61,070 102,198 129,630 163,769 3.5 Refuse Disposal 3.5.a. Estimate the quantity and types of refuse that will be generated by the subdivision. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, approximately 2,000 pounds of refuse and recyclables will be generated per day. 3.5.b Describe the proposed methods of refuse disposal. Response: Each residential building will be equipped with a dedicated trash and recycling area within the basement. Additionally, fenced enclosed areas will be provided adjacent to each building for spare and full containers. For the commercial building a small dumpster and recyclables storage area will be provided near the loading. Refuse and recyclables will be managed by a private disposal company. The transfer station on Swampscott Road is available to residents for disposal of larger items and is located approximately 2 miles from the project site. 3.6 Traffic Facilities 3.6.a Discuss future vehicular circulation patterns including number and types of vehicles. Response: Two-way traffic is proposed through the residential portion of the project site with entrances at Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. The Harmony Grove Road entrance will be the primary entrance to the site. The average weekday traffic is estimated to be 978 trips per day (i.e. 489 entering, 489 leaving) for the residential portion of the site and approximately 166 (i.e. 83 entering, 83 leaving) for the commercial portion of the site. The total weekday traffic from the project site is estimated at approximately 1,144 vehicle trips per a day. Most traffic will be passenger vehicles. Legacy Park Apartments Page 14 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 3.6.b Describe the proposed pedestrian circulation pattern. Response: Sidewalks are provided along the main internal site roadway, providing access to all of the buildings and parking areas and connecting with existing sidewalks on Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. A public bike path is proposed along the North River and will be wide enough to allow for foot travel as well. 3.6.c Discuss the location and number of parking spaces proposed. Response: On the residential portion of the project site, parking is proposed within the building basements, along the front of the building, and in the westerly parking lot. A total of 215 parking spaces are provided for the residential buildings (1.52 spaces/unit). For the commercial building, 24 parking spaces are provided. Per Salem zoning regulations, this would allow for a business with a total of 24 employees. 3.7 Electric power 3.7.a Discuss the power demand of the subdivision. Response: Approximately 500 kW (peak). 3.7.b. Discuss the source of the electric power and the method of supplying the area. Response: National Grid will provide the power. The existing overhead system for the 60 Grove Street commercial building will remain. For the residential buildings, underground electrical services will be provided from an existing utility pole located along the southerly side of the site. The service will be routed through pad mount transformers located adjacent to the proposed parking lots. 3.8 Gas 3.8.a Discuss the demands of the subdivision. Response: Approximately 2,000 MBTU (peak). 3.8.b Describe what the gas will be used for in the area. Response: Natural gas will be used for heating. 3.8.c Describe the source of gas supply and the proposed method of supplying the area. Response: National Grid is the local natural gas supplier. An existing gas main is located within Grove Street. Legacy Park Apartments Page 15 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 4.0 Community Services 4.1 Schools 4.1.a Discuss the effect of the subdivision on existing schools, including number and ages of children generated by the subdivision. Response: Based the 2000/2001 National Center of Educational Statistics and the US Census 2000 for Salem there were 5,007 students in the Salem Public Schools and 17,492 occupied housing units yielding 0.29 students per a household. The number of students generated by the 141 housing units is approximately 40. There is not enough statistical information to derive an approximate age of the children. 4.1.b Describe the location of the nearest existing schools. Response: The locations of the nearest public schools are Bates Elementary School (1.1 mi.); Collins Middle School (0.6.mi.); and Salem High School (1.0 mi.). 4.2 Recreation 4.2.a Describe existing and proposed recreational facilities, including active and passive types, and age groups participating, and state whether recreational facilities and open space are available to all Salem residents. Response: Recreational facilities in the general area are Salem Golf Course (1.3 mi.), Mack Park (0.1 mi.), and Gallows Hill Park (0.5 mi.). The listed facilities are available to all Salem residents. 4.2.b Indicate location and width of existing and proposed pedestrian ways, bikeways or bridle paths. Response: A proposed 10-foot wide public pedestrian and bike path is proposed along the North River Canal from Grove Street to the existing railroad crossing. 4.3 Police 4.3.a Estimate the total population projected for the subdivision. Response: Based on the 2000 US Census results for Salem the average household population is 2.24 persons. Applying this population to the proposed 141 residential units yields approximately 315 persons. 4.3.b Estimate the total number of automobiles for the area. Response: The total estimated number of vehicles at the project site is estimated to be approximately 240 vehicles. This is based on 1.5 vehicles per Legacy Park Apartments Page 16 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove residential unit and 24 vehicles for the commercial building. 4.4 Fire 4.4.a Discuss the total number of buildings to be constructed and their types and construction. Response: Three wood and steel framed apartment buildings are proposed on the 64 Grove Street site. One existing wood framed commercial building will remain on the 60 Grove Street site.. 4.4.b Describe the source and quantity of water available for fire protection for the area. Response: Existing public water mains are located in Grove Street (8" & 12" diameter) and Beaver Street (8"diameter). Existing hydrants are also located in front of the 64 Grove Street parcel and adjacent to the existing way off of Beaver Street. An existing private main (6" diameter) extends down the aforementioned way onto the 64 Gove Street parcel. A private main (8" diameter) is proposed to connect to the existing private main and extend to the public main in Gove Street to create a looped water main. Three hydrants and dedicated building sprinkler services are proposed along the proposed main. 4.5 Public Works 4.5.a. Calculate the total linear feet of roadway to be publicly maintained and plowed. Response: No pubic roadways are proposed. 4.5.b Calculate the linear feet of street drains, culverts, sanitary sewers, and waterlines to be publicly maintained. Response: No publicly maintained utilities are proposed. 5.0 Human Considerations 5.1 Aesthetics and Visual Impact 5.1.a Discuss the change in the present character of the area due to the projects, i.e., land use, density of development, etc. Response: The proposed project will be a substantial betterment to the neighborhood. As noted above, the existing industrial site is run-down and falling down. Over the past five years, the Salem Police have visited the property approximately 35 times due to vandalism, theft, fires, and reports of breaking and entering. The proposed land uses are consistent with multiple projects recently permitted Legacy Park Apartments Page 17 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove within the project area. The density of the proposed development is consistent with local zoning regulations. The proposed project will improve the character of the area 5.1.b Discuss the measures to be taken to minimize the adverse effects of the project, i.e., architecture, buffers etc. Response: The project site will be landscaped to minimize potential adverse effects. The developer will minimize the amount of vegetation removed along the southerly boundary to maintain a natural buffer between the proposed project and abutters. The proposed buildings have clean lines, classic colonial styling, and varied surface materials and color to provide visual relief. The buildings will blend well with the neighborhood. 5.2 Parks. Forests and Recreational Areas 5.2.a Discuss how the siting and construction of the project will affect existing and potential park and recreation areas, open spaces, natural areas, and scenic values. Response: No affects anticipated. The proposed project will clean-up and enhance natural areas. The bike path could help link other open space projects along the North River Canal. The undeveloped portions of the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel could be made available in the future to the City for open space or natural area uses. 5.2.b. Discuss how the project will affect recreational opportunities in the area due to removal of parks, forests, or open areas from public use. Response: The proposed project will not remove parks, forest, or open space from public use. The propose project will improve public open space areas. 5.3 Public Health 5.3.a Discuss the project's effect on residents'public health due to changes in water quality, air quality, noise levels, etc. Response: The proposed project may improve the health of residents' through the removal of vacant industrial buildings, environmental remediation work, and anticipated improvements in groundwater and surface water quality. Legacy Park Apartments Page 18 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove REVISIONS . wre oescama+ . SITE PLAN FOR MIXED- USE DEV.ELOPEMENT LEGACY PARK APARTMENTS AT HARMONY GROVE 60-64 GROVE STREET & 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD SALEM , MA DECEMBER 2011 LIST OF DRAWINGS: OWNER& MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC N-1: PLAN NOTES APPLICANT: 9 ABBOTT STREET / BEVERLY, MA 01915 sr C-1: BOUNDARY&ZONING PLAN ENGINEER: GRIFFIN ENGINEERING GROUP, LLC . C-2: EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN ❑ P.O. BOX 7061 100 CUMMINGS CENTER a n� `� `a C-3: SITE LAYOUT PLAN SUITE 224G o BEVERLY, MA 01915 Z_,,.r - O� G4: GRADING,DRAINAGE& +° 2y EROSION CONTROL PLAN SURVEYOR: LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES 161 HOLTEN STREET SITE C-5: UTILITIES PLAN DANVERS, MA 01923 C-6: DETAILS I O s'' BUILDING BEAUDS ART, INC. C-7: DETAILS 11 ARCHITECT: 15 LONGWOOD DR. O� O KENNEBUNK, ME 04043 O C-8: DETAILS III a LANDSCAPE SEBAGO TECHNICS C-9: DETAILS IVO ARCHITECT: ONE CHABOT STREET R 1 OF t LANDSCAPING PLAN WESTBROOK, ME 04098 $ o &A 1 OF 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SITE WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS LIGHTING: 1919 WINDSOR PLACE A1.1 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN FORT WORTH,TX 76110 A1.2 FIRST&SECOND FLOOR PLAN LOCUS MAP A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1" = 400' A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS e� amts EROSION CDXIRRDL NOES(CM41). UEUIX MOM(CONT.) I.THE CONTRACTOR IS SIMPICA1LY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCAROM AND/W EIEVATON OF ME 10.ALL PROPOSED SLOPES(EXMWNG RIP-RAP SLOPES)STEEPER PEAU 5:1 AND ALL SLOPES 14.WD WATER MAIMS GROSS OVER SEWER ONES WM LLA THAN 18'VOTCAL CUFNNANM "SING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON THEY PLANS IS BASED ON ME RECORDS OF REGARDLESS OF SLOPE WTH AN OVERALL CHANGE IN GRADE GREATER MAN 10 FEET FROM TOP TO AND WERE WATER MAINS AND SERVICES GROSS BENEATH Sl N LINES,SEWER UNE AND WATER VARIOUS PLATES AND WHERE POSSIBLE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN N ME FIELD, THIS INFORMATION 5 BOTTOM SHALL BE STABILIZED WM EROSION CONTROL MATRNG IN 5 ME REOON9®ltt OF ME UNE SHALL BE CAREFULLY ENCASED M C*KI EIE ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND FROM PPE NOT TD ME R EIM ON AS MEMO EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR M REPAIR ANY DAMAGE M PROPOSED SLOPES(SLOUGHING,EROSION FIC.)RUT SURFACES A MXMUM DISTANCE OF r ALL AROUND AND ENCASE NT SHALL EXTEND ALONG N UMIE5 AND STRUCTURES SMALL BE VERMED W ME FIELD PRIOR TO ME START O RESULT WRONG CONSTRHICRO{AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL NATIONS AS PRATED BY THE EACH PPE A MINIMUM OSTANC:OF 10 FEET FROM THE OTHER PRE AS MEASURED NORMALLY CONSIRUCl1Q1.111E CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ME APPROPRIATE UTLITY COMPMIES.COVEMING gRC111EtT/ENONEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO ME OWNER. ROAM ALL PUNTS ALONG ME PIPES. PERMITTING AUMORITq AND"MG SAW AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR M MY EXCAVATION WORK TO REQUEST EXACT FED LOCATION O UTILITIES ME ENGINEER OF RECON SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN 11. ME CONTRACTOR MALL KEEP ON STE AT LL TIMES AOOOONAL HAYBALES,EUNA SILTATION 15.PROPOSED GAS STENO:LOCATIONS ARE ARPROAMATE ONLY. ME CONTRACTOR SMALL WILTING O MY UTILITIES IMMIRF RING WM PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL FOCUS.A STOCKPILE OF CRUSHED STONE EXTRA FILTER BAGS OR MY OTHER ITEM SPECKED CUMERM WM ME GAS COMPANY MAT CAS ONES INSTALLATIONS SMALL BE BY ME LOCAL GAS ACTON WILL BE TUEN BY ME EMONEER BEFORE ME CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WM ME W . IT WREN FOR EROSON/SEOMENT CONTROL FOR INSTALLATION AT ME DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER COMPANY. ME CONTRACTOR SMALL GIVE ME GAS COMPANY ADVANCE NOTICE OF WHEN ME GAS SH.WL BE THE RE9PONSBWtt OF ME CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EMSING LILIES W ICIM OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO MITIGATE MY EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. LINE CAN BE INSTALLED. ME CONTRACTOR IS RESPONLL S I E FOR ACOORDINATION.EXCAVATION, CONTI WM ME PROPOSED IMPHOVEMEINIS SHOWN ON MESE PLANS AT NO ACTION&COST BACKFILL AND COMPACTION FOR ME GAS UNE TO THE OWHR 12. ME AREA OR AREAS OF ENTRANCE OR EXIST TO AND FROM ME STEL SHALL SE CLEARED O 2 THE CONTRACTOR BULL NOTIFY TIE MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING STAFF AT LEAST!0 ALL VEGETATION,ROOTS AND OTHER OB.ECTONATLE MATERIAL AS DE1EgI1NED BY THE EHGNEER 16)ELECTRICAL AND MUEPHO E SERVICES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND SCHEDULED WM ME HODS PRIOR TO ME COMMENCEMENT O CONSRUCIHON. OR OWNER'S MEPRESE.NTAWL THE AREA OR AREAS O ENTRANCE AND EMT SMALL SE APPROPRIATE UTUTY COMPANY SERMONIC ME PROJECT SITE MANTAMED M A CONDITION MAT WLL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING O SEDIMENT OFF O THE I TE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MANTMNMG LL HOMIZONTAL PROECT STEP ALL SEGMENT SPWED.DROPPED.WASHED OR TRACKED OF THE PROMECT SITE 17)DUE TO ME SMALL SCALE OF ME SITEWdO ORAWNGS,FACT LOCATION O UPPITY STUBS AND VERTICAL CONTROL POMIS AND BENCH MARKS NECESSARY FOR ME WORK AND FOR MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. FOR WILDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WM ME BUILDING DRAWTHM SERVICE STUBS M PRIDING ANY CONTROL INFCRMATON NECESSARY FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO ME MI-DING THE BUILDING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO A PUNT IO FEET FROM ME WILDING WALL UNLESS CONTRACTOR. 13.MOM TO IMITATOR O CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT ME SITE THE CONTRACTOR SMALL CONTI NOTED O2 MTAIED. ENGAGE AN INDIVIDUAL WITH PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND EPERTSE IN EROSION AND SEDIMENT 4 LEST PTS WERE DOE FORME PURPOSE O ME STOWNATER INFILTRATION FIELD DESIGN AND CONTROL TO MONITOR SAME ME ERICSON CONTROL MONITOR SIAL PREPARE A WEEKLY REPORT 18)ME PRIMARY ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ARE SOWN GRAPHU LY WHICH SHAIL BE KEPT ON STE AT ALL TIMES AND SMALL BE SHOWN TO LOCAL,STALE AND FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES ALL ASPECTS OF ME THESE SERVICES SHALL BE DESIGN IID BY SROM TURF OF OUSFRERI AT MESE ENCOUNTERED PUNTS ONLY. THEY DO NOT NECESSARILY SHOW FEDERAL AGENTS UPON REQUEST. THIS REPORT SHALL INDICATE ME STATUS O ME EROSION ME CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WM AIL LOCAL,STATE FEDERAL AND UTLITY COMPANYU RIE NATURE O ALL MATERIALS 1D BE EIICWNIFRED WRING CDISTRUCTON. CONTROLS AND ANY MAINTENANCE REWIRED AND PERFORMED. THIS REPORT SIAL CONFIRM M STANDARDS AND CODES ME OWNER HAS VERIFIED ME AVADAMUTY O ADEWATE ELECTRIC AND S.GRADES,BOM MSTING AND FINISHED.ARE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. THE LLC MAT WILL HOLD ME REQUIREMENTS O ME EP'S NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSICI DOI ES) TELEPHONE SERVICES ALL COSTS AND FEES ASSOCIATED WM PRONGING MESE SERVICES ME CONTRACT AND/OR ENGINEER ARE NOT RESPWSBE FOR EMING GRADES MOM ON PERMIT. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO F URNMING AND INSTALLING All STRUCTURES EQUIPMENT.CONDUIT. D AWING& CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL AREAS WHEREIN SLIDES ARE SHOWN TO SAME WRING,POLES.TRANSFORMERS,PADS,PERMITS,EASEMENTS,M.NECESSARY TO BRING MESE HIMSELF AS M ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND INCORPORATE ANY DSCREPMtlES DISCOVERED. 14.PINY DEWATERING REWIRED ON ME SITE SMALL OSCNARGE ME A TEMPORARY SLMD BASK SERVICES TO ME RULING SIAL BE COORDINATED WM ME OWNER AND IS ME RESPONSIBILITY CORRACTOR SHALL 0E RESPCVSBLE FOR ESTABLISHING ALL CONTROL POINTS AND MARIONGS OUTSIDE O ME 1WBUFFER ZONE FROM WRMES O TOM CONTRACTOR UNLESS SPECITI ARRMGEMENES ARE MADE WM THE OWNER N MEETING NECESSARY FOR THE WDM. PRECAUTIONS SMALL BE TAKEN M PRESERVE MATERIALS OUTSIDE ME PRIOR TO ACCPTANL£O TE BID. ME BUILDING CONTRACTOR WLL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR UNE O LIMIT OF WORK IN ME MOST UNDISTURBED CONDITIONS POSSBIE 15.PETER TO ME OPERATORS&MANEENC:PLAN(OW)FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. INSTALLING WRES AND WNOUIT FROM 10'OUTSIDE ME BUILDING TO ME WADING ELECTRICAL POLY PARKING AND TRAFFIC CONEUX NOM, GRADING R DRAINAGE MOTET 1.HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SMALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS O ME 1. ALL CATCH BASINS SMALL BE EQUIPPED WIN A GAS/OL HOOD ON ME D OMAR E PPE AND 19)LIGHT POE LOCATIONS AND PHOEWEIRICS ARE BY WLS LIGHT O FORM WONT.TEXAS MND AMERICANS WM MSAMUTES ACT(ADA)O JANUARY 1992 AS AMENDED. SHALL HAW A 4'DEEP SUMP IN ACCORDANCE WM THE MASSACHUSETTS SE WWATER ARE SHOWN GNAPMCLLY FOR COONINATON PURPOSES CIRCUITRY IS TO BE DESGN/BUKD BY MANAGEMENT POLICY. TIE SE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR HOED BY ME CONTRACTOR. SITE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING DE9ONATED WM A Y SMALL BE SIGNED AS'VAN ACO &E'PER ADA FOR INSTALLATION O A COMPETE AND OPERATIONAL SITE LIGHTING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WILL 4.1.1511 2 ALL Sf01M DRAINAGE PIPES SMALL BE RW.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL LOCALE STATE FEDERAL STANDARDS AND CODES,INCLUDING WRMG COMMIT.STRUCTURES, BASES.PGF$TIMES.ETC. STE CONTRACTOR SHAl1 BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUIT,WRING, 3 AUL OURBRNG SHALL BE BITUMINOUS CWCFETE UNLESS NOTED OR DETAILED OTHERWISE. I ALL STOW SERVICE CONNECTIONS(ROOF LEADERS)SHAT BE 6'INSIDE OAHETER OP UNLESS ETC.UP TO tO FROM ME PROPOSED BUILDINGS BUILDING CONTRACTOR WLL BE RESP,DNSIBE FOR OMERMSE NOTED BY ENGINES. WSTAUNG WRES AND COMMIT FROM 10'OUTSIDE ME MU DING TO ME GUWNG ELECTRICAL 4.ALL UNITS OF PAYING SIAL BE CURBED UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE ROW. 4.A MINIMUM O 6'VERTICAL ED ERE AL CLEARANCE SIL BE MAINTAINWWATER SERVICES GLASS 5. ALL SROM O ON PARKING STAGS SHALL BE 9'IN WDM BY 19'IN LENGTH. MM 21'ASGRAIN N OS NE UNLESS N01FD OETAIID OTIERMSE 5.RIP RAP SPLASH PADS AND FLOW SPREADER BERMS 91A1L BE PROVIDED AT ALL OUTFALLS AS e.ALL PAVEMENT UM OF 24 H SHALL BETWEEN PANED S O 2 COATS LE PAINT TE CON UFhClU SHALL DFTARED IN ME DRAWNGS ALLOW A MOWER IN 2HI HOURS THEMA COATS E PANT UNLESS ME PAINT MANUFACTURER PEONES LOWER W COUGH CALX ME YMUFACTURER'S REWIREMEMIS 9ILL COVRN. 6.PEER M ME OPERATIONS R MPINTENCE PAN(GAM)FOR ADDITIONAL MffORMAlIgI 7.CONTRACTOR SMALL PETER TO ARONITECTURAL/BUIONG PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATWS AND UTILITY NOT"S MDNSIWS OF BUILDING SIDEWALM VFSTSULE%SLOPED PAVING.EXIT PORCHES,RAMPS TRUCK 1.ALL WATER MMNS ARE TO BE WSUUED WM A MINIMUM O FIVE FEET O COVER AND A DOOM,PRESSE BUODMG OMEN9ONS AND EXACT UTILITY ENMANM LOCATIONS MAXIMUM O SX FEET OF COVER EXCEPT AS NOTED,METALED OMERWSE OR REWIRED BY ME CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY. A VALMHON IN MSE DEPTHS IS PEWITIM(E ALLOWED BY & ALL MALEFIC CONTROL SONS AND MARKING ARE TO CONFORM TO LOCAL,STATE,AND FEDERAL CMITROILMC MUNICIPAL MMMM WIRE REWIRED TO AWID CONFLICTS MM OWER URUTES GUIDELINES HOWENOL CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED DD INSTALL WATER MANS AND APPURTENANCES IN ACCORDANCE WM LOCAL KOUNREENTS O ME CONTROLLING MUMCIPAL AUTHORITY.MCLUmW, DESCH CXMIRD NOTES BUT NOT HOOTED TO CLEARANCES.BFDMHG SACKFUL,M ULALIM EIC. ANY VARIATION FROM THE I.ME WIT OF ME W\ EINE FOR THE PROECT SHALL BE ME SAME AS ME LIMIT OF THE PLAIN LAYOUT MUST BE BROUGHT TO ME ATTENTION OF TE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALUTION. YORK NECESSARY fON CRAONG FI UTS NO MOA(91AIL WQR BEYKIND MESE UNITE ON NK BEYOND ME LIS DEFIED BY ED BY MEE HAYBHAYALE/9LIFENCE. LC GENERALLY,PUR WATER MAN CONTRACTOR ORMTKED NO THA NOT ALL ARE SIS RE FOR INSTALLATION LOCATION PURPOSES. ME WHRAC TE 91ALL NOTE MAT NOT LL FITTINGS REWORD FOR ME 2 LL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES 9HLL BE CES FOR RB IM ACCgNARCE WORE(ME NOTED,SHOWN.ON INDICATED. iFM WM TE MASSAE,DAM EROSION AND SEGMENT CONTROL ALL OCMs FOR URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREAS,DAZED MARCH 1997.AS AMENDED, MID ALL LCOAL MUNICIPAL REOUUTONS T ALL WATER MAIN FITTINGS FEES HYDRANTS,ETC.SHALL SE RESTRAINEDNLIH tlGItlETE Revisions THRUST BLnas c EROSION AND F MY SITE W CONTROL MEASURE SHALL IO IN PLACE ALLPRIORB TO ME _ COMM KSHOUT IT OF MISE ON. WOW:EM EARTHWORK NPLACE OPERATIONS AND WORK IS MAINTAINEDCOMPLETE AN 4.ML HYDRANTS SHALL M VALVMIID AN A B PTINK RUNOUT AND SHALL L MEET LID LWTH THROUGHOUT R I SERUC110N,AND flELIPYI IN PLACE UNTIL ALL SITE MURK N6 COMPETE AND MPRUPAL SIZED GATE VALVE BOX,AND EFF L BE IN ALL HYDRANTS SIAL MEET LOCAL GNIUND COMER 5 ESTABLJSHED. MUNICIPAL MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS n SHALL BE INSTALLED AL ACCORDANCE:WM All LQUAL MUWCIPAL REOJIREMENIS HIDRARTS AND THEIR PIPING SHALL A MECHANICALLY 4.TE CONTRACTOR I6 Y AT 7 MADE AWARE IT I $CIL SUSCEPTIBLE T TOPOGRAPHY.AND RESIRAMFA TH COME TO I CONSEQ AT MIS SITE MANE IT PARTICULARLY L MEASURES,TO SOL EROSION AND SCESSA 10 In CONSEgIER OR HEMUWM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE DE]EMED S A MINIMUM AN 10 FEET OEM HORIZONTAL OAC SIS P BE RT A LAED BETWEEN SALON OF PMOGM NECESSARY BY ME ENGINEER ON THE MUNICIPALITY AT NO AODIDHAL COST TO TE DINNER. SEALER MANS AND MAIN, MAINS WHENEVER CONDITIONS IN ASE A TE TRIS SPAND MN O 10 pUyF^N FEET V TO A WATER ANN, T WATER YAM SHALL AT EA IN A SPAUEE TENCH AND ME SME EROSION CONTROL 4EAS.PES E CON ON TREY ALL BEDRAMNGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE I A W TER MA THE CRONN O 111E SILVER STALL BE AT TEASE 18 MgH6 BELOW THE MNRt O ME qyA SINGE STAG,O CONSTRUCTION. ME CONTACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORE ME STNS. WATER MAW. DRAINAGE AND AUGMENTATION GM EROSION CONDO DI CRUSH INCLUMNG HAYBALES,ME SLRENCE. DRNNpGE CIPAM TEMPORARY SEGMENTATIONS BASINS, ES BAS STONE ET:. CURRENT Ot I6.N DOMESTIC WATER SFRVIGE3 2.5'AND SHALUR OPLL BE TPE K COPPED TUBLNG ARD SMALL BE SINAL MTOIPAR AND MODIFY ND EXP CONTROL URE CONS BASED ON PAST AHD MEPR INSTALLED WM ARPPOPPoATEY SIZED CORPORATION STOP WM APPROVED SADDLE,CURB SFW. WEAMFR CONDITIONS.SEASON AND EXPECTED FUTURE CIN THE DTON ACTIVITIES, TI MEP IN M AND BOK BEGUN CO AND SITE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS GRANGE IN THE EVER MAT FOR EDINNE IN ME EROSION CONTROL PLL RACTICES RESP ARE DIETER ROAMING.BY ME OMNEA,OR AN AGENT FOR 11E OYMER. SE J.ALL WATER PANS 3'OR LARCIX ML1 Z GELHENT LINED DATES IRON . CA55 ISP,AFD PPROVRmINGONER0OS0ON CONTRROLS ASS WEEY TT MDIM�MMTCOSSTRTO ME OWNER.oMERWY STALL BE IMSTAl1ID WIM IPPROPoAIEDY 9IID FITTINGS AND GAR VALVES - LEGEND (TwlCOI All S/)eOtS1 & DCMESTC WATER SERVICES SIAL BE INSTAULD WITH APPROPRHARIY SIZED GATE,BOX AD 6.WoUTRES SMALL BE SURROUNDED MM STMED MAYBALES AND/M SILTATION FENCES E, TEE FITTINGS ..I^ STONE BOUND/DRILL HOE PROP.WADING NIGriffin PREETT AND/OR CONTROL STOCKPILE AND EROSION. ME LOCATION ME STOCIPAREAS • CRILL HOLE PROP.RETAMING WALL MAY SE MODIFIED AS APPROVED BY ME ON-SITE EROSION CONRCL MONITOR.BUT SMALL BE 9. ALL WATER MAIN APPURIENANOE,MATERIALS,METHODS O INSTALIATON ANO TESTING Engineering LOCATED OUISUE ME 100'MEILMD BUFFER ZONE. TOPS O STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED IN REQUIREMENTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL LOCAL MAMMAL REQUIREMENTS 0 IRON RW PROP.MT.CWC.CURB GED LLC SUCH MANNER MAT STMMWA"DOES NOT INFILMATE ME MATERIALS AND HEREBY SUCCEED ---- PROPERTY ZINE - - - -PDP.FDO O GRAVEL IM MAKING IT UNSUITABLE FOR i81 USE. 10.PRIMURE AND LEAKAGE LL LOCA MUNC LL PASTANDARDS TIMING II AND REWIREMENIS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FM - - EASEMENT LME --$---PRO.CONTOUR P.OBOX7061 7.EARMWOIX ACTIVITY W ME SITE SHALL BE DONE IN A MANOR SUCH MAT RUNOFF IS ALL COSTS M CONNECTION WM UDEN TEST.FLUSHING AND INSPECTION AS REWIRED BY ME MEAN HIM WATER IME w PRO.WATER UNE iW C(CNNM96 C6MeC SUN,2206 DROM TO TEMPORARY DRAINAGE SWALES AND S DIMENTATON BASINS LOCAL MUNICRALItt. ,/ ......••�•M'.MM,, p0 C PROP.WATA GATE VALVE BIVMN AIA 07915 &HAYBALE FILTERS AND/OR FILTER BAGS SNAIL BE PLACID AT ALL EGISINC k PROPOSED CATCH 11.PRIMARY WATER NEVER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTED SMALL BE LOCATED AT THE POINT WHEM EMT.CURB �'( FROM,HYDRANT BASINS SIUECT TO STORMWAIEA RUN-OE FROM PROPOSED EARMWMM AREAS DURING ME WATER UNE ENTERS ME BUDDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR MARED ON ME DRAWNCS TIL 978927.5111 CON5TNCTION,OR AS DIRECTED BY ME OWNER/ENGNEER. NO SEDIMENTS SHALL ENTER ME MHHHNHHHHIH I FIST. RAILROAD TRACKS -I-PROP.SEWER GRAVITY UNE F=978927S103 M-SM OR OT-STE MANAGE SYSTEM AT PINY TIME. FILTER BAGS SMALL ME INSTALLED INSIDE M ALL GRAVITY SE WA PIPES SMALL BE POYNNY-CHLORNE PRE(PN:)SRR35 UNLESS NOTED EI5E RETAIONG WALL 0 PRO.SEWER MANHOLE CATCH BASINS IN HIM TRAFFIC AREA WHERE HAYBAES WILL INTERFERE WM TRAFFIC OMERWSE ---14--- LIST PERM G PROP.GAS LAE MRM PROJECT 9.ALL ER�W CONDO MEASURE SMALL SE PHASES OF INSPECTED.CLEANED AND SROAREDALL OR 13.IN MINIMUM O 18'CLEARANCE SMALL BE NANTALNID WHERE WATER MANS CD55 STORII 0 MST.PENCE p0 PRO.OAS DATE VALVE RIACE AT AS NECESSARY IHR AT THE ALL PHASES O CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTIONS SILL TAKE IDMAx LINES MANAGEMENT, LLC PALO AT ION IS ONE A WE(AT F E END O THE y KIND SH PRIOR TO WEKEN05 OR WHO W-EXIST.WATER UNE D PROP.GRAM UNE PPECTTATON NTATFORECASTED.RP CITE TO NtlES O MY KIND SHALL BE CORRECTED ECR S if pO EXIST.WADER GATE VALVE 0 PROP.GRAIN M H 60-64 GROVE 'ST. EXPECTED R AFTER EACH ON PPOs TO LEAVING ME SITE FOR O. WEEKEND.RAINFALL WO D DEFT SHALL EMT. HYDRANT ® PROP.GRAM uARgE 3 HARMONY GROVE AI50 OCCUR AFTER EAON RANFAL EKNT OF CREAMER MM O.5'O RANFLL MD DEFICIENCIES CORRECTED WRING MAT WORK GAY. -6 EAST,SENER GRAVITY EINE _ RL PROP.ROOF LEADER 1 W- FIST.SEWN FORCE MAN PROP.TRANSFORMER PAD B FIST.SEWER MANHOLE -G-MST.GAS ME -----EROSION CONTROL NOTES DG FIST. GAS GATE VALVE -LOO BUFFER ZONE D MST.OR,VN UW W EXIST.CAICWASN ® FIST.DRAW MARINE `CP MT.UTILITY POE SQw6 r-w 'o- LIST LIM POLE W/LIGHT J&H,TW 9AN-1 �,2nDn, RYA 100-YEAR ROCO 20NE VE ROA() ZONE A(d 10.0) NAR ipouc oGR50 �_ ')__ H uN17. 3 HARMONY GROVE i `�_Z/1L �\ \ s' ROAD PROPERTY IS a1T85LY MTHM 111E - \ \ .SESD.ESEx4A H�OWRLAY \5'(µ\��S /gyp-/PLOOD IYrF IN/F 3n \\ \\ EASEm1r DISTRICT P\Oasl(L\L% �'^ 1 i HA�r W)W \ ,! TOR�Hl YAP 166�wi zx moi i \ \ Pa mN 6 THE _ w mUK 5'IREti IEK 6T.LLG \ / \ \CANAL. lINO CPRi RAN J8811A ` NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL SEgD. ' / / _Rau 4� OVERLAAY 60 mow STREET \ 4`Y/., A EASEl1ENT 1 EMMANC \ aS1PoCT PROPERTY ISCMRIDCLT 047RAN R \j\\ ENnREI.r 1MTHIN ME I�OVERLAY (3 HAA�IONYL6R0£sRD.) MYNO \ KTAND ROOD \ F 1 DISTRICT SQIT 5613305'E \ `\`\`\ HAZARD OOWRLASTRICT 1 % MST. 1 N2516'20E 0.52tACRES 1I�1-19.455 ABIIIYEIITS iu.P IN/`F'319 \ MRD 1 3aso'_ L-1a.tY _��__.2�-- va "�--�- \ _lo mmc a R-ze44.eTBAY sefss•os-E xa}11•D5'E T..ANSPORTA77ON R.R. TRACKS ` AUTHORITY Ny _ R.R. RA 5 RET.WA 18004' 56133'0.5'E - -'I-+ MASSACHUSETTS __ x 97wst - caro a \ (.sesie sasFr » 1 - ��� BUILDING 59 1114 11.99' BARREL ` 062 ACRES N24'4015'E -29.5 N22tIe'ZSy STORAGE MSTNG I ENTRANCE COPopDOR ]USO' R-2014.81 St 105E \\ C-1Y! STORAGE I OYERIAY ORRiICi \ - APER \ EXISTING -- 1 \� 512 ` OF IM sw .nl'W FEMA tai-YEAR "En'"IfD fL00D ® EYmxc YEAx HIGH NORM `\BUILDING ROOD ZONE Hxv AZARD OVERLAY CHIYNET WRIER IME 5 MSaE 8.62 R CAN RE uNE ZON116N.L IN THIS PORTION E A(6 10.5) dip a51RICT HLOOD HAZYro OWpAY--�/ FACE OF REI/JIdNG 35p3j.J AL-"A' SDe b,34^M DISTRICT nh� / t/ ME CANu© FINISHING �qi ` WALL 1Dw•Q e.ef - 1+nl 1 I e 1 BUIMNG - ze 1 L e�YAP 18 LOT 2}6 1 CSC LAN01 1 COOPERAGE \ __ ( ( VPLIR2 FEMA 100-1 ' NC / ROOM LOCO ZaS �Y=12.w ; 5.]B ACRES ��� 11E'ILAYO ROCO 20B.1T� I ZONE A(EL 10.8) `��\ HAZIAp OVEHIAT 151]Y ( � RYA,W YEARDISTINCT1 (, - YIP,6 LOT 211 .8000 ZONE 1 P2 " I __ - `` � / zalE A(a tae) \ _ . �� GAZE Re96P2 D9b os-4,ti- #5 PRETREATNENTc \\ Revisions ry FACILITY RE£ \ 1 _ _____ _________RE ____B_PD_DI_ST_RICT_ YAP mLDrae BPD_ISTRIICT___Y_________ _ QQ CT---------- - -- - - R2 DISTRICT G SILVER -- ]F �-rtz o1sTRcr MO'S11 Y x3o15.6�E -s310 Dew x]W 1 Rz asmcr i (RIBLR WAY 1(n FIU'ILS 2 _ _I]2.1Y 10.a 10.31 T 1 NBDIT0.TW �BUILDNGN' \\ I �A e4 3 ^� MAPI. LOF 16110 _ ^ 561111 e 10 \ WAREHOUSE �2 §G11 rAP f�� -8 I YAP 16Im 1 Cxay�Y 1 g132 i 128 Yeo®Q x,0m'lYw \623•sa'a9'W I n(Tl N/F �3 r x/P NBV39'S4'tY J 226 SS 6 I nmar H QF, I 1 0.4 OYW 1 N30'.b'16 11188' N60�95a W 200V 11.90 INA " ,yN p6µ 29. 4' I 20.41 YAP 10 l0F - _o N81Z5'51'1Y WALL \ AP NIT I TRUST I 'I1�'1 I(� Y/F -- . 31.51LOT ' N7.q`'1YW \ 4 1 nme M� Ka ' I )- I I W 1 (� YAP 16 TOT 2II 0.3_ 69.99N}12Y40 n \ 15'S0'W 1 IN � a 1 I 1 Q Q ILOT �O Q.I" NAF I$ '� 8.51 YAP 16 \ 11.15 / I �3 e++ 3 3 i N S 11A5 �m �m 1 elo Lm 21R \ I rz.zA'/ 1 R6s*s aD u ml r� YP19 YAP 16 \r `23425 /4D 6 YN IB LO Zbl e24 I' Y V 19 LOT N 24 NT 90 _I_ 1 13D T1/1FSCN \ A91 /14 ]]] PA \ 130 u (WiAN. N8035'4YW _ N51Z4'2O'W `\\ 2023' BEAVER STREET N W3rWAaw PDB) Griffin (Pueuc MY-3a ImM) - FND Engineering -- ----- _ OVERLAY a51RICT \ (SR ZONING SEG 922) `\ P.O BRT7051 \ 100 CW.N/19W Ceder,Stile 2246 BeIW1Q;ALA 01915 Tel.'97&9275711 - Tec 9789275103 MRM PROJECT 9 MANAGEMENT, LLC 60-64 GROVE ST. N 3 HARMONY ROVE THIS IN ORU PLAN Is PREPARED FOR THE PURPasE OF sNON1NG Ewmxc zanxc 0)OWNI AR N. 2)OLIN TON SURVEY BY IE9LANC SURVEY ASSOOA DAWN.MG,OAHVERS,MA 8 3)EIESIJRFA SHOWN ARE S THE 1929 N.G.V.O. S 9 4)PROPURGAa;UTILITIESFOR HARMONY ox-atE W ARE T APPRO ON THIS Plus. BOUNDARY & 5)PROPERTY DHSS Gat J HARMONY GROVE ROAD ARE MND. MATE 8)REFER TO SNEE1 N-1 FOR AOal10NAL NOTES AND LEaRD. ZONING PLAN RFFF RO 1)DEED Boa(25700 PAGE f09 2)DEED B 7654 PAGE 26 GRAPHIC SCALE mal'-ro' 3)PLAN BOOK"152 RAN 95 4)LAND COURT PLAN(aTY) 5)RAN/5529 n1241B Alh.tla:m C-1 6)PLAN IN DEED W.5452 PG. Ill Li n PLAN IN 0®W.4901 PG 400 M P3i 1 1 Ye!-10 R OW6I2/2OM B: —-- FEMA 100-IEAR ROOD ZONE Zv1E A(EL 10.6) DE a EpSf. t pRMoNy c WAY n V' ) \ 3 HIM(NOPE "� R(IN)PIR 25'IOE ENT ISLY WITHW ME /" ��l//f3-"/ q~ \ \ SE.&D.SFWEA NAZNN OYERRIOAY TY s 16 4WRP- OT Yr Z \ \ 1 \ j� FAS]IENT DISTaDT ��� Fii' lid xdO\t \ y \ `\ YM I6 LLIT 2Y g Yl(P" Axx� \ xq \ / \ 50 FAO4E SR i T P RFK 3 CgIRT%AH.3AA _ NORTH RIVER CANAL - )IDA � o COASTaL n O` 8 255 v,q)E i "y-tr�'Pe`}1`' 'm¢a urEc �-i SESOEASQIFNr _ '�� BNW / - exolp— aF _ \\ \ 60 GROPE STREET MM 16 LOT 239�ne MlsNTY is � wd n _ wTRELY�WMININ T0. HNdONY CI5611 EO1��`),/�� exan> Ew xc \� x O IIET-ANoOEF Y \ <FF ./ RAILROAD Z\ l\h 082�tlBS MH ^�� -� \ ABUTYENl6 1�SWER DISTRICT` �r OR05SN6 %R¢IIE HrR x r aGlc B"°`1` EAsww -- . a _- - HAY TRANSPORTATION R.R. TRAacs AUTHORITY s'wn TRP s _K-JR�E / RE.WALL - TOP OG L'Glf� YAP 16 LOT 237 - -+� USE -T'� �6 \ COASTAL _-w- (60 CAD\£STREET) aMxa SSA _ _ _ -` \� B,wx Z--- 26 W m.FE a -\ BARREL BUILDING 59 \ 0.82 AIXES STORAGE _ -"-i i���__ �_�___�_� _---• \ � STORAGE EXISnNG t �� AREA EXISIVIG II- I-- \ /" \y \ ® ti r NOR77y BUIITINc � "-A(EL ZOHE - 1{�w`•- \\ \\ 1\ \ MIANEY `� r B6 R7�R CA c C IYi/20NE A(EL 0.6) ' \ S \ ♦ 1 HuwD v I � ,l WSTNG ' . A _11DA4 r A� x`-� ©\ DYERHEAD �3 REr. w MW smucnRE HI ALL raw. WASHSTING �ING F1 B.Bp �`, aT 1 I ^^� \A 1 1 ` 1\ I� �• / ` BUILDING EXI ' DG( OYfltHEAO R smucTURE " w w e _ uAP 16 LOT 236 9 { UNOI GROVE STREET) \\� �� _PA1tlErtjLiHfJ1) a� _ 1 NC COOPERACS 2i38 AWES \`� NE (ELM Z���j�� b1^ \�\ � � w PM� ! — I � MER�IID S \ _____ J i HAZNs 004TBCT YAP to LDT 217 \Ll `^`� `�. \ ^ ____ .- . . ) PENA f00-IEAR \ \ �`��`==�\i 1;9 • ^-, I L-- -- -- - (EL ) \ �-_= PAAp011 I Dab OemmBm I \ �%�_________-_-__�,-__ l_ \O\ \ PRETREATMENT _t ��'t��• \ -�\\\\\ FAaurr 1a� • _ Revisions WA IB Lm Tl6ET. s SILVER Et w (PUBLIC WAY )y O` YIP IB04 m le ;t*7 YAP 16�qr 1 MAP tB IED1 mlir I ° x /29 \ ` Msa® -- .y• \\\+a\\ �r `t''y ndREs 62 3 I x I 1 I °32 x) i - k, 1Dr `���\ ✓ h �A�IEK 1 YIP16 YIP Te I 1RU5! I I I x/TIff.,.W7T °°�yI- II '4 • _f� �{ ewmD1 %wauER) I 1 Q I Q oomnt 1 la ^• I a YAr 1 2s lor.me vnaw� .I n M>o1r '{`fes 6f OONG NAP to 2 h n 1 I I I 3 1 1 3 1 xA I ( L_ I /t0 Lm ass / 1 I 1 /zs RBS /30 -' I OI YIP le WF WT 2lt TOOT m PAm QI / MST _arco wnun r J p B p 6 B E NAP IW/F Y8 11 ]S x PA79 REW 1-t10.2B _e BEAVER STREET' - -- APPRo>�Y�ATmLar),AraN Griffin (weua WAY.30 WM o Nv xe: Engineering Group, LLC P.0 Bar 7061 100 CunWTl6lgs Gmter,Subs 2210 Bemy,MA 01915 Tat 978427-5111 FR,978927-5103 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 60-64 GROVE ST. 3 HARMONY GROVE i 11)PLAN 6 PREPARED FOR THE P MPOSE OG SHOWING EWSTING CONDITIONS 2)EWSTING C MTIONS SURVEY BY IE6LANC SMVEY ASSOaATF;ING. EXISTING DANVERS WA. 3)EIEVATONS SHOMN ARE ON THE 1829 N.GV.D. CONDITIONS PLAN A UIWIIES SHOWN HEREM ARE THE RESULT OF RECORDS aF VARIWS PLANS Ai61 WHERE POSSBLE.MEASMEMENTS TAKEN IN TIE FRLD. ME ABSENNSE OF SRISURFACE UTWTIES IS NBTHER INTENDED NOR IMPIIED. CONTRACTOR TO VERYY USTINGUTILITIES IN TILE MWPRIM TO CONSTRUCTION AND 10 Cv1TACT*MG SAFE AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXVATM MOPoL. GRAPHIC SCALE �6'1•�IB 5)REFER TO SHEET N-1 I'M ADVTpTK NOTES AND IEMD. c)PER SNDA CONSERVATION CONNISSCN DRA.D.(FBE/61-516)DEVSION DAM 7-18-ZDII THE 3 HARIAMY GROVE ROAD PARCEL 6 LOCATED WITHIN -2 Po\ERfRONT AREA. AS OF 12-20-11.SAN AS B MaSM HEEN APPEA TO nl)EIi PTP/aAI'-0 DEP FM A SUPER=ING ORDER - (v rYr) 1 lme�a W IH1612!/DAf _ ROAD oosT. GOTwm i "' WAR � -HARMOWATER \ YAW�IIRAm� - - -/ \\� UNE) 25 SNmESEWER Gj moi' �� �' � YAP IB NT!T/ \ FA3IIENT HISTORIC I WADER YHKH ///RA DAS Ct Arm SR YRS-� / NAAV YIDIE HID \ \ 1 Mm 16 lDi 2b T nAH.xlmu ------ NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL SEi0. FA41mlT \j\\ HISTORIC' WATER AATERR INEDGE ABUTMENTS -- IIID 16 IDT m RA 0 -I9 N/F _ -_ -_ _ _. _ __ _1._._.Za _.- -------- N - _lo N ,M 6AOI[ AUTHORITY Ewsnxc ioApxc AIO SIv..x BAY \ TRANSPORTATION RR. IRacxs Doa TO RDIAIN -�1Y D R.P.VA(XS 2 a MASSACHUSETTS __ -ilm� TSE I - I A+lo - aL T1 A 1 o.e:NOR7N R/I'1:-/� CA eul INc dul SP OwI w�GEAR m I.INDN0ERn \ll\ NAC-nOgC �5 RE7 wqu -jy e 5 vAlnm NIIZ ]® '1'RANIR fl. 8.63 -- _ B 1 y - wAw 461Cw R mic Y W/"ABllgq Q &-cK REE FI6IFW IIIPI Olx (4)y6¢Oi50E4 P A we -__-- y ` MSIORIC m \ 22 • NATER UNE _ '�` . V V Yl.6oW: W'/PNRDA YM I0,IYDT r) r 1 • - alw[Illrl (q_Ub1y,�DFR HISTORICxl V WATER l9ff 012 -�_ s Deb DgpljOm Revisions SILVER � �We Cl �ISTPo TT y E16as---- - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - (PUBLIC NAY L_ ____ R DI C 6.2' I(n y 47.6' g'A #4 XiT 1 4 N i 16 yp BM I I mFTI um 1M T I Mm 16 uIr 1 O'ILEY P I 1 uN B28 I 6o.+srt -i R% F2 1 2LT I AT2 I �WF N6i¢➢ERI 1RIISi I I I 1 N AIL 1 Ym IB bT ffi. Eti-TATE f�--�--I Ym IB OR]3 A11 IOxAF um 16 WT= y2 1 I 61AIbF1I 4 I I I Q Q IwTum1 23 uxti r YAP 16 I6B i N 1 I I 3 I 1 3 I PD 110 um is Ym 16 ��T )/ /b7> (40 I 8 I Ym IB lOT ffiI A24 P MAP IDT 2M /�F66 PATi�I E14 6P N PA R2 -- -- -- -- Griffin BEAVER STREET �** WAY- FIND AEngineering (PUBLIC b' Grom LLC P.O Box 7061 NOI 100 G6rmm9gs Co ,,&0224G 1)REFER TO SMFET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL 110 F AND IEt . Bove*A04 01915 Tat9789276111 ZONING CHART For 978-8276103 REQUIRED NON-RESIDENTIAL'PACE PEN RN PROVIDED (151.202 6r) MRM PROJECT MIN. LOT ARG 60,000 5F 296,659 SF MIN. LOT FRONTAGE too' 761.37' MANAGEMENT, LLC MIN. IDT WIDTH -- 164.1' f Ma. LOT CO+ERADE BUILDINGS -- 14.5z 3 HARMONY GROVE MIN. NON-RESID. SPACE SOR 51.0% MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH 59.1' ! MIN. SLOE YARD DEPM -- 47.6' MIN. REAR YARD DEPM -- 40.0' MAX. BUIURNG HMI-11 50' 47' MAX. BUIU]WG HEIGHT SfOR1ES 1 4 SITE LAYOUT MIN. PARKING 1S SP UN 2 215 PLAN FOGMOTES' 1) REF. SECIKKI 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FROMAGE REOUIRMENT; R2 USIEU. 2) LOT WIDIFI MFISURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FROM YARD GRAPIHC SCALE SEIB4CK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. 516 t"1B 3) MAX RUMNG HOCK OCCURS ALONG FROM OF BUIUKNC 3. 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIOEMML PORTION OF ME SITE (1.5 SP/UNIT). 24 SPACES PRONDED FDR ME COSTING OFFICEC-3 BUILDING (MAX. 24 EMPLOYEES ALLOWED). 1 ms a )n � Fn/6�'6- . P➢7612/e0/17 _ ROADGROVE / ZMoN (,,y ",DE) _ ty9 C` ` �4 NA - 25'UK // P _sEs.o.sEIVER GLI Gle)ll EA5E11FNT ''.LL \SCJ \ YAP 1a Uli 210 X \ 50 tliOK 3116£]IFIL M.LLC \ t / \ \ LAID CdIRT RAN}181.L NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDA� \ \ \ �_G,pO / COASTAL \ \ eT�.c FASTINGMST. p� ` WP 16 LOT 3M \ /IRABROAD ABUl11O115 BUfP� =n - MOSSIN AUTHORITY _ _ BAY mlmua TRANSPORTATION R.R. TRACKS rrae p FllD9q R.R. TM Of, MASSA USE Yn AuVmxWua STORAGE ORAGEBaK ERSTNG \ AA msugn MSTING MIT O'na � slow a GR,t 1' NOR p MIMING \ \ \ ad \\ `\S \ r�%SAGE IaoER� 1 -710AL (a>-UMTS) I row= MG-tzp - �. - FF210 aXrm,l / W �OOtR w/(��BUapNG uLp -Z�� 06 Wt (QIY➢1 CII �CNRAY NM IM LOT re ' _ \ • � 4 RevisiOns n% _ ----- _-------- =14 --_ kmdSLUE1. 4 mOHt ' X/F WM/T w,e 1T7 NAP 16 I uw 16 Lm 1 Mjr I AwIYAL C82 m DMN 7.4' Ire zox 1 1T7 x �3 arta "� _ _ �A�^w^ isevm.- \ ��`�n � ���- �• `\ pp RTAS P2 I v3 I to I t32 u Own m NW 131.8' irr I.DA L^~ _ �1Q�'� j,�R YM 18 EAEAL �.`y`� ®3 to gIX2 5.4' ire 20x I YM 10 a: LON F I TRUST I I 1 I� a�q la YAP,a LOT /LxXa Mao,o � � � `.y��- LOT YA Xp�ER I I I aM-ifa N/T 14E aTAr.MEET 0.D \ \ P1L pNH2 m'g51 ga.5 15'1 1.Ox I X/Y xvr ta0 Ari A0 '� afr1WE YI➢IB LOT yq � / pplapT XY® CB4to wosi 17.9 1rr lox I 1 p1 µa I I I 3 1xLNUe= 5( I t 1' to wIn.NA.� 2 0.176 Y/n 19 "W400 wast to DYN3 a2' Ire 1.5% I t48 I I I I 1 3 za 1 IN iza \ 1 1 L tt0 YAP,e MAP 16 1OH,T J BT I YP16n 291 t k . , Io MMM LOT m7aeODMUPA 1706 cas to OLIH4 IS.w 12"0 1.5x tb I tag t3O p/g - VV -/14 5- N 'Air. GBS m DYH4 SW lrr tax _ J- -- Dura m DUNS 181.. Iwo 1.5E a BEAVER STREET Griffin Gas m UMH5 28' tr1 lox m4,mr nne -ATI _ (PUBUG WAY-JO'NAE) _-- --_ DIMS to p11Ha 1ST 18'1 251 -- -�- -------- -- ----- ineenn En ®>m GUNS 17.6• Inz0x ----- -- 9 9 DMH6 to M= Saw Iwo 15% MCA LLC WDS2 m Thew z0' Iwo 25x P.OBOX7061 1101 m Mw MY 6'0 8.0x 100 DAMW� Cwnar,SUHe 2216 D M>t6 an 2a0' Iwo V PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE BaveIN,U401915 CBB to DUNS M.Y 12'0 4XX Tet978,92]4111 DYHB 14.5' RM-20.80-21.80 RIMY 11.X1 RIM-21.00-21.000 RIM-15,40 R11�1Y10.07 SIMox, Sw GOD Shc lf[T PT DATA(10/17/11)am FOx97B-92]4103 ®9 to 1r0 LOx INV-17.80 WV.-Bb TP-, (fL 15.9), - DMHB m DMH9 25.8' Ire 3.3x KF)=17.30(127 I(F}9.43(187 I('n)=8.40(12') flIY=1,.80 RIM-9.60 I(F)=17.60(6-) I((F)t)=g. (I I(F)=GID(f5') 1(F}7.50(,8') MER-6.5 DELTB HORIZON MILM tAL(8 ROME OIBEB MO m OMN9 lox ISM 0.0% MIT1(F}17.50(67 1(wrt)=9.33(187 I(F)=G4a(127 I(F)-7.80(6") I(F}4.75(1x) 0-80 FlLL __ __ SANDY GRAVER.BRIMS.UTNE TRASH MRM PROJECT RIM-20.80 RIM-10.50 I(out}1730(127 1(.t)=6.X1 24 I F BO-iz0 C s IOM 5/4 SINGLL-ptAW,LOOSE, VNaES ACROSS PIT �� MANAGEMENT, LLC INV.-17-80 INV.-).W ( 7 ( }7.50(67» 1(F}435(12 =1 Ip DYHB St' leo 1.2x NO 1(Oot)=7.25"a') I(ONt}4.50(127 NO RLTIISAL.NO WEEPING NO MOTILES ROOTS TO 1013' 1)ALL MAN PIES d ROOF tFA0tTt5 TO BE CAPABLE Q OM82 RAI-14.,10 ESHWD Qp(71207 SUPPORTNG A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING OYHp to oMH10 ,00.4' 24'1 O.Sx D@.} DB14LL' RIM=1 A��ROOF r4nER 2)MTAIUM RETAOONG WAGE PLANS REWIRED DURING 60-64 GROVE ST RIM-20. RIM-9.n RIY-21.20 I(F}895017 RIY-5.45 TB01 t Wlz m WHIG 7.r 1r1 t.a: JWV 17,80 INV.-6.50 I(F}1590(127 1(.t)- 65(1r) I(F}5.15(24') STC (TRENCH MAN) M (Fl t7.g) FOR FI IMIT-M. TYPICPL sECTONs ON sxEEr c-7 ARE PRONpED 3 HARMONY GROVE I 1(F}16.90(12') I(wl}8.85(iB7 I(F}6.90(127 STC 980 RIY=10.85 DFETB UCBIZW 1EY74BE Gf6f® MDIIlFS oll1EB FOR 17MI10 MG ONLY. CBIJ m OMHIO 7.1' irr 1.4x RIM-10.b MV.=10.40 0-56 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL BRIIXS II1TtE TRASH 3)OETARID BPoIX£PIANS MEETING AASHlO STANDARD$ OR5 C1312M KF}17.00(07 I(F}8.80(127 MER E1O.=8.5 51-64 A F19 IOM 3/2 GRANULAR REWIRED WRING CONSTRUCTION. 5t MCS3Owim 80033 5.d Iwo 1.Ox RIM=16.8 MM=10.0 KoW)=15.80(15") DMtlZ K-0-.0 5(24' '(W)-5,30 84_74 B IS 7_5W 6/6 FRIABI£,BIENDS MTH A IA1FR 4)CONTMCIOR TO COORDINATE ROOF 1EADEItS MITI MIMING i 80053 to OFt¢ 986• 18'1 z2x INV=18.80 INV.=7.00 (DROP MANHOLf7 Kp„t)-5,35(za7 ( t). (247 ml(B] o0WM5rWT MCARWS RETTR TO MIMING PLANS GRADING, DRAINGE & 4 DyB� DM=11.20 KPXe}sza(le') RIM-21.75 NO , s IM a/4 MED. SAND.VMY6 ACROSS FIT CB14 m MI54 14.5' ire O.1x RUI �E4G15 Rtlt=20.43 K.t)-z0(187 DM-q INV.=,270 NO RW.S NO 200 NO MOTTOES 5)TEMPWARY CONSTRUCTION STREET ENWANDE 10 BE CONS1RUClED AT RIM-19.80 Po4=9.55 1(F}}14.00.057 Kout}255(187 PoY=9.30 8Tb44 ESHWT: Oa(71207 MDPOSEp GROPE T N-I ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL 8015 to WOS{ 7A 1r1 1.3x INV.-16.00 MV.-8.55 I(F}17.W(67 I(F)-5.80(127 SM 4501 'Mwe 6)R6FA 10 SXEEi N-1 FOR PDDIlNp1AL NOTES ANp LEGFNp. PLAN WOS4 W OFA 525' ire 2.331 Kat}13.10(tr)- DYNE I(F)=5.60(127 M=10.0 RIM=20.75 TP-3(EL 17.3) CBIS m DMH11 SIX Ire a.5x MM DB1-9.00 -TO FED) KF}7.35(127 KOu[}5.80 027 I(M)�4455(11) INV.-11.50 0F24 tl9BB0tl 1Frnlx TdBd1H unm cc SANDY MM-1&25 PoM=9.80 amil FlLL - - SANDY GRAVEL,BPoOCS UTIIE WASH MV.-1225 MV.-6.00 I(F)-7.35(1r) w9Sl I(wt}830(1r) MITI") 24-36 A/8 Its IOW 3/2 MA UJI.AR 801GRAPEQG SCM.): SCW6 P-10 7 to DWI! MT irr 1.3x Nu I(wt)=7.25(127 STC 800 RIM-25.50 38-120 LY s 1080 4/4 MED. SANG, Owns m MOSS RIM-14.00 MAN 1%0' 1270 0.5x �Z MAN O OGLE RU19.20 RM-zo.3O INV.-14.50 NO REFUSAL•No NEOV4 NO NOTDES 1 KF}1225(187 I(F)-15.15 057 ESHWG 03(7120") �i lm mat.MOSS M4' 12'1 a9; INV.-11.80 C810 Q 15'r I(F}15.88(12.) KF)sig.4s(127 C-4 MOSS m OFi4 39.3' 12.0 55x P11< KWM}I21s(le-) I(aut}16.90(15") NOTES SOIL TESTS PERFORMED BY: 4 BLWOIETTE,PZ W 10/17/11 $Moet P/PA" l a rax.) ,Dae-m n. DId612nDn1 R GAD GVAEB)HAR /T EMT _---�� MISS \ 35 SAM / S.ESD.3MFR /YIP 16/IIT ail Fg54 \ j�� MDlT \C/ ` NANIWY 00"'E., FST= E STREET REAL ,MG \ / \ \ LAN,CGDfI flYC°6e NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL %� me6mlw CAASTAL / / i�// Rm a xETu \ \ \ L $ 25 SIDE /° ama Y�/rte G F w � sc 7] e.. n n RIDGE ewTs EN W 1e LOT n6 1 RAIROAB \1 MH ac EASEIAEN BA+rYTTRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TRACKS P - BNPIF MASS-Ea«u _ \ _ TOP OE ACNUSET __ __c� TA L _ ____ BANK \W RYiA1L4 Nyi E1O511NG y __ STOR.AGE \ ♦ N __ wlni AflEA MEMO G i wmaRW , �xA�P IVOR7Y - eoulE�nllrNc tap aW PRGPosn wRlm ro�i-"n� °a-1 �—- �,. S.,* R/V�-R CRNA 7T0 C 1 IS GARAGE n�, — L AL Lam .� m.r•m V a �� �� �V . WALL o 1 we a GW.0 W , 4i- TS1 rne¢ Rew p ,_� 0 c _ OR wSA ASIA,16 m I¢tRM. WW���&p®J PVY,rI a♦w_¢A-� � — (D"T9 WWwWI ) D^o. saAai A�ONOERa we ROSSIm A)El wlrva �0� �_• _ _ rmnW� Y PROpOgp , Wim'♦-♦--s�y�p�e .• �� Wj�geDNOTNG p aux�m wsR � Mw 16 LOTV7 Ui-TµT OE'R I y�y ��_ � l em PP W.r•m ac aRv x¢ravx¢A �°moo OV p Ala r we r mYA T.e mr.wn♦m a - _W=y, 'e' m. wCRY.11.g • M ' 119A' D..". KOW SO RW rAa W naive v� ® awe _ �i -� 0. u�Fim - Y Z YW (1W7 _ _, , , e RBVISIOI)S S_(LV'ER MIP t ae ♦ wAvn° C4swvo-cr10 _ �_O (PueuG WAY i x 01P a A —e � .tee ILO . o m.sr m K _I —_� a• ver to DCO a ae ® 10.r•m °a110w1wn'WiD TTI MM 1e*L#2 �E A a:l I MAP w LOT I oor[Y I B 1ti H /1a v.D® venter wm eae P1v.w snxa 'o W^ (11E wa m m EILLS 3 I Ya�1 YIP to I I I Is EST mA w°meemrim LOT a aw�Enl A I '1���-----------_Ii I tmmAE lnnr zss Ai I I w.YmDN I I I I Q Q 11uqT� 1 utiRs I rR w1e mIE♦A' MAP 1e /s.v.11 I I Aµ I I 1 3 1 1 3 I Rba 120 I I L_ PD YIP 16 LO7rXIS / /10 SCHSDLII p6 I p6 BR I YM ie l0T TAI rzA �1 I I YM 16 lOT #6 LOX 2H 10M,�TT]B6 PATRFM / pyNi J __ J_ pa WT All W PA11W01N R W1O26 amum -� J—�J— Griffin BEAVER STREET AWIIOmA%�Lo)cARO (p C WAY-3v SQX) 9 W WS6S E7lgineering LLC P.O BW 7061 100 CrwwWp76 CeNx,SPAS 224G Bm*AIA 01816 Fax Tet 87&827-510 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 60-64 GROVE ST. } - 3 HARMONY GROVE gi 6 tlnr« - UTILITIES PLAN 1)MRE PROTECTION BUILDING SERMCDS TO BE SIZED BY MECHANICAL DIONEER PRIM TO ISSUANCE 6 BUIEOwG PERMIT. Y)E)OST IG BEMER INVERT ElEVATONS AND SIZE TAKEN MW ft V _ RECORD. cONTRAGTDR TO VERIFY IN ETEND PRIOR TO COMSTRUCRDE COORBNATE MTN ENGINEER AS NECEBSARY. GRAPHIC SCALE $T�y ryp 3)CONTRACTOR 10 wSPECT METING WATER AND SEWER MAINS TO BE - - ENTWNEERAAS NECESSA P. 664 GROVE STREET ENTRANCE COORDNATE CORN - NAM ENJOINS SERVAM LOCATIONS MTH OTHER DSCw11NE (w Enr) ImmBt12 a,m.Pnnn-e C-5 .: 95)PEFFR TO SNFET N-1 TOR ApDRONAL NOTES t LEGENO. 1'me=b R CAN12/pn1 �� SEE TABLE Q" ` A 851 CalCREIE _eBET PIPE �� IHRIIST MDaf I AGAINST YNdI1G ARFAS DI1Ms1URBFD �---rn Fat THE MEA _ :. . \� YAIERNLL REaaED YAX Sp:.MMf 4 doAM 4esA¢ WATER I N SAlwlr'VE.AS ARJJSTA&E VALE BO% MMMII fRN¢MN TY WFRMC M 1W ANY WLER 6 RAND �\ fIW91m Cn'hR 4T AT i1N191FD QtA➢E SfE WT A s T.lF£ H ro MN®/ PLAN OF THRUST MAX. tY Iman VALVE w'E BLOCK AT BEND .•;� H/2 MAX. rA 49;1 A0.NSf ro mAttT O Q 5d CW WATER AB! 6 YRI�q(� EL1M OR Ctl1AR O MMT TIP IXY1E SIFPS lEE / /hU% WKCAST RISA ]Ot0 P9 NIORIE GATE VALVE -wAtm IAAN r wTEmu Y� -P"'Emv,.w N.T.S. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK AT PLUG W90N 1, N.T.S. BAY PRECAsr YANNnE W/ 15 MAX L GdPAtT iO ISi Y[n.NIOCItl! aFM tltVAIIM BAawel MATEIEM. M TABLE Cf 5 LFUSNEo No SIdFS VAGfA MNI Y � 1WNST BLDIX SnNE BASE COPACI 10 YSS IKn.flNCint BEARING MEAS BMIX YASYNRY fR PLN OF THRUST a Bpg� BLOCK AT TEE IECMARED 1.coxauTE 1.aao Pv ImmAM MIPx ze DAx z Rfl16nt®sAII 12 K(DON ro n) ASIY At . $PFG oaz s¢ APPAf[�M IM,11W M.H-W Fr.N0 nlz STI M(DON WAIST BAY BnrT1Y1. 9�tl1 ORAw w 1 N-A DE9fN IAMW4 '•tlr � MTFA,SE'Fli,tll YtNL 1.IFAMpI iRAYE MID WI£I(GTI1W N0.l/318 pl AP%NYFD EQIrvAIERT. 1z ;K Yr Ar 1M001Y OF➢M Oi EGLf u1G101 ro E 1 sxFA PIn:GSr tli APPROKV EaRYMFM. NWArs As mNAnn ��®��n"� n Toxo¢earooeE,nxTs YMm rerx BUTn IaESa.BOTn REsx. Y YK• IROUIID 91RFAQ ].YE F MNX CMNECIIM DETM SMFf C-Y. •• � . B FauxDAMAnax suPPORr mR sMuenaE PER¢oTEaaacAl ENfdEm. 3000 P9B0NO�E 4'0 PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE BAOMC AGA MA -SEE TABLE Q µrob D 5 YN-9JTIfN UTARIUIDED YAIWM. MO 9LE5 1lMAT MOIX 9828 o?FN Imrt. AS• FlJM1GAREAs YM N.T.S. �/8'W19®s1aE YAX mR iHF NEA PR W6E]®BMIFL Bel W E VA, JMf RSIRIMIS ISG➢ 1 YNMiE�A OfADE (r¢FOdS OI IEWND)FUI at •f9R WL18£WYI M RS PiL nW 0 SIME 6 YPeFPM(STEN INET 6 NNFI. ALL.MYS YAM 14 ff M' Y 3 6FHU.wf1101 ZD'a TM / � r ' EW NYStNIL AMD wITM 15 . _ ff Y/AI IAIE TAPS 0 9'Ilµ®• BMI 118 MRNMIT WM TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING SECTION If ° ► 7-SRAN� D�RFA�Arow. IE AS REWIRED fN.T.S. =f Revisions THRUST BLOCK SECTION MMNn.MEa wrow. PRQrIDE,8 PI.FT. 6 +ro•OwNIwD SMIc ro 8� wmTx CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK AwXO61C REYIRD. ��/ Ir AmIE alw xaE 6•0 PW 4' uiN'COVER o.r xnAvxr MIN. SL SEWER MIN. -- AaE ro 9RAM• INACE N.T.S. tEF dmn may) SLOPE 2Z Y YMY:R6IRIMG MCRIOEIE B,q]t va MnallD SEWER MAIN 5 TABLE OF MINIMUM BEARING AREAS IN SQ. FT. AGAINST UNDISTURBED MATERIAL VNDISTU am MSIADEY ICNAY PRESSURE 150 PSI TYPICAL HYDRANT ASSEMBLY WITH DRAIN MATERIAL rt7..]r caReY as PIPE TYPE OF SOIL CONDITION N.T.S. BUILDING CONNECTION •wuX M Y AOAmuPYAxr urnEss xOTm SIZE BEND A B C D E F G oMmwsE YAA E1.6E-+/+•14A mor N.T.S. TEES & 8.5 4.5 3 2.5 i.5 1.5 , Griffin BITUMINOUS SIDEWALK 6• PLUGS Engineering N.T.S. and 90 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 T.-5 GmuA LLC smaller 45 6.5 3.5 2.5 2 1.5 1 1 221 2 3.5 2 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 P.08OIt7061 TEES 100 CwrA*MB CN ,,Sudo 2246 PLUGS 15.5 8 5.5 4 3 2 1.5 TSI MDB Bovedy,MA 01015 e• NroYxws 90 21.5 11 7.5 5.5 4 25 000 ° ° oOt. Y aAss t Yr.C.ONaEE eamaA ears¢ 1 °o 0. (YSuo-TA} 978-927-5103 6 3 1.5 80°°z2 t z s 3 z 7.5 t t t °o° e Am xlr.ow ^°' 8 N''D'o-TA ") MRM PROJECT �� 1 uNanW rNcs ° °00 Re 1 ,Y BDIY mMm muslED sMxE A - "rte 4m1mAeTSn'sMxADE MANAGEMENT, LLC BmAMMS alN 15.4 Fif nAY,fYE lD%F S40 Yi• 1Y11 KYPACIED +!y,-�:i:a< I y _`x � /��� B --wm a aAr,.lYOn m n ume rvc wwnBD wm \ cwlwlTs(trP.) IOL FBEe aF 60-64 GROVE ST. o - miAYsAIo�T / $1 3 HARMONY GROVE { CWRY i; CPMY E - MAIEI 's- F - SaT ROIX i 8• 6 - N/AIP/N 00 FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT /2f IEAYD 6 Yi1MB ��§ N81E5 g t FaR mTMez Mix less Trux zz Tnnlcciwx uY eEARMa NEAs FYR a}BEIm. %/ • mA¢Areaox �`\\` N.T.S. DETAILS I 2 JMI15 SHNL NOT BE FNCA4L M CONQ1lE BFIRXG MEAS YAT BE M9IEDMMD fpl NNR(TP.) BITUMINOUS CURBME 1RMOIF3 N RW(WIFAE ME 1fP OF ME ROIX FACE 4 AT pl ABDI£n1E MM Y YM TAYGfD SMD MU.'hL BQMOM iLL Np 6NY INMm Q'19Bp SIbE 9PoIIIB IBEf llff MIDAIxwI N.T.S. ME mE NDI[YEA,NIIGEIE BAGNMG SHALL Y PIA®BEINF]M THE mE MD ROat FACE ABaIE MM BBBW Ca1WIR - SPEC81GnaH5 E3TABIB®N TIE JAW tlxnax 6 w YASSACMIYTI$IBMwAY "MIUDIT SDAMAAD SPEPRGTNNS m HNH n AIM BxdS. i IAl CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREABlanc Y N N lDosE Ims NOT M m®14NYB5'MM a a1YPMTm m �ypy5 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TRENCH AATS111�BE9aMl Off W M Wr WIMYM art a Ti M DmTEMW®w N.T.S. FOR MULTIPLE CONDUITS44_I�T°° ('A-E xm ro CxE DAM IV"/ll - Ball�nhhh-Y 12• 8' 15•a1DPE RPE 10Y CNDPE iROA Worn VERROW ,�.._ti,-_ lY 2{• e' W.I0.m NV.-14.75 18' SrORMID END CAPS SIOIMTECH SC-310 DYH3 wuL ton RIe 48. • PTI=nW SPAS OTYP CF 84) INSPECTION FRAME 8 COVER EL IOr BEo SOIME FRAME AND ar (TY,Or 7) BTA EL 13.0 TO(RADE(m 15 00\ SET AT FINISHED TC } 12'0 MME OF n MADE GRADE.SEE NOTE 4. SODARE FRAME ARID ) INV.-13.1 nNSHED GRATE SET AT PRIMED GRADE MADE SEE NOTE 4. CONIC,C(LLAII RING 00 J lY YIN. 8' lY ASN. ADJUST TO GRADE P. tY0 SIORMIEON NNE 2{' ADJUST TO GRADE WITH NURSES 25' PTI 1253ANN1M . WITH NImsFS _ 8• cs BRlrx (TYP a 2) Di BRICK CONE R4' AMBE ON AMBER END LAPS RISER �. (TYP O>) RISER 90' . S 1 STONE 12.0 STORYTECH R�sza�+ + ON INFILTRATION FIELD DETAIL D'YANDmD SEND RPE SIE PER PLAN A END PT/1298M}t R>s 48'SUMP YIN. OB/DFD T NOW BASE:, AIY TYPE BY OR IIDARQI ON APPROVED EQUIVALENT PIAGRADE. PROPOSED PAVED #ARMING LOT NARVE FILL. ". BRICK MASOMW W B' SIDS BASE -•. CAST NON FRAME d:COY (420). 3000 P9 COJOt 6'CR119HED 3/4'-1.5 OICII WASHED. 3/8'CRUSIFD STONE SET W 2 GRADING RAGS h MORTM BED STOW BASE al .MWWR STONE OR SCREETIED ISTOFIERA� OR 2 COURSES BRIO(AND MORTAR ORANUL MflL-GRMED PLACE COICPEIE COLLAR MOUND N4� SECTION VIEW SECTION VIEW ��FABS>D2/SY SOL M%COMPACTION BELOW vao(N(GRADNCmRN6 SIROCTORE 1.CONCRETE 4,000 P9 4NIMUY AIER TB DAYS 1.OD NON-MOVER NSPECnON PORT MRH SOWN-IN CM z 1EINFORCEO STEEL MI CONFORM TO IATESI ASTM AIM SPEC.Q12 W. 1.CONCRETE 4,000 P9 1@IMW AE1ER 2B DAYS INFw.IMU)COIIRFIFLY SC-310 aNAMBEA �• RICA IN FT.AND 0.12 W.N.(NRI WAYS)BASE BOTTOM. z RBNFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO IATEST ASTM AIM SPEC.0.12 SO MAX LOAN a 3.000 PS CONCDEIE IN.AINEAL P.AND 0.12 SO.N.(BOTH WAYS)BASE BOTOLL CHAMBERS PROPOSED 3 LEBA OESON 46 PRIME a N-20 DEMON LOADING (7 UN1S WIDE, 12 LONG) 4.LEBMON U-R46 fAN1E A SWD L04flt(YAM(ED OMAN)W APPROVD) 4 LLDARON If-240-2 THREE PLAICE W APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 5.SiELETNT. 5.SIEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EWNAIENT. S SHFA PRECAST OR APPROVED EWIVAIENT. 6. TONGUE A LR IDNE JONTS SEALED NTH BUM RESIN.BUM RESIN. 4.PVC B.TONGUE a tlt00VE-0Rn5 SEaIED W1H BUM p[dt BUM RE9N. >.FOUNDATION WPPORT PER CEOTEC NICAL ENGINEER - 18' 7.FOINDATON SNPORT PER(EOWONNMAL ENQUEER. _ u : ..- 410 PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE 6 ua. 4�0 PRECAST CATCH BASIN N.T.S. N.T.S. a Yon. I C ED PORT TO BE ATTACHED 1MRWCN Aq Doe,I DWsadPeorl en rs .-31 -12* 6• sc-310 CHAMBER ar�lTERR-OUTOF CHAM"BEA RBvisiOns BIM Q FEUD 'z{• EI£V.13.0 AN x' iR•YN, IVP. FILTER fABWC>OZ/ST EXv,25 I 0.6. MON-xowM.WRAP NRL Rier FILED NMPIETELY Awr•Aa• Concrete Pipe Division Rlr er INnLTRATION nFLr) INSPECTION PORT DETAIL p ,mu- Concrete Pipe Division TYPICAL CROSS SECTION RLS STC 450i Precast Concrete Stormle for STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBER SYSTEM nonva p STC 900 Precast Concrete StortnCeptor A.Ts (450 U.S. Gallon Capacity) (900 U.S. Gallon Capacity) �T EAanoWO Ola NwlNeY aaYm. - „�, !)Wlllf/LTIaa aI SNMFIM«M ffAANR Oda.MIME,a1. Rm«and Cma(Na Gale) Samaplor a'v WT1NmWma.a and us(em-oi-mw 5 Son Fvdd J Glma bade A' On I I /L U.// 91sT rvlaMd T{'D OutlN {• a Fr Of ONNNTECH POYOENI DRAONWOH POYOERN R at4=# P� 6'r ROUND litAlE tYr ATWUY ONAIE 4W oflGriffin YniS' 1. dd, iR RACE I THIO(uT E. r/{•CaD YaN GM, $LDPE ro MAN O f I Ir Al O GRATE. S1mmaPIL 41N.1ff ALL MOUND. 9OPE TO DRAIN Loup, LLC mceR COMPACTED - COMPACTED Group, LLC EMT {'0OPM hddMe EM1H /W Cw McWDS C8,11W.Sofia 2246 MMl 6"' 0 Bev&*,,MA 01915 {'I OMN I 18' RSe Pae 6Y SlR}5 POC Tek 97&8276111 TM RISER RPE For:978-927-5103 - AS REDID OEPM HOPECSRGATED(S« AS I EOD r Cr OWMI ON MRM PROJECT Plan Yew«'r MANAGEMENT, LLC .w60-64 GROVE ST. 6,0 mRaS Pvr _ 3 HARMONY GROVE MN. 7f%OPE 12 r CONRUCATED • Section Thru Chamber H,I ea nBow W/ @Y N DPE PIPE A- y.•__• Y Nsnt I.Ube 6'r 5pR;5 PVL' GA9IETED ENDS MIN. 2w AOPE (i«OPeer9 a Face SEe Wct) 9O ELBOW COMPACTED CRUSHED Section Thru Chamber• -T Plan View STONE BASE COMPACTED CRUSHED . STONE BASE DETAILS 11 Nolen Nolen 1.The Use Of Flexible Cmnectim a Re:enYwded at The Net and aMt Were AppibaMs I.The Use Of Fk he Connection a Remmowded of Tho mal and aMt We«Applmawe. YARD DRAIN #1 L4e2 2 The Cow Shetld M Pditaned Ow The Inlet Drop Pipe and The IN Pat. z The caw 9,mM be Pmitioneel Ow The abet Drop Pipe and The Oct Part. YARD DRAIN #3 1 TM Slalnaepta System a protected by ane a mare of the fa9orilg U.S.Patanlx /4985118, 1 The S( la S en a looted b one a more of the fo0orbq U.S Palmtx /1965144HUM N.T.S.#496331,#5725760.#453115,#1649161,0068765,J6371690 054980. FMTfi0, M 15,Rd49161,FW65,PM690 11)THE BASE FOR m5 MINING 6 DRAWNG SID-110%3 N.T.S. Saw%YyD 4.Contact a Caxrzte Pipe OiYblon rillowalothie M flvlh«Ideas not Mlel an Into RYK` @7 4.Contact a Cont.Roe Dhidm rep!«ella6«b heNer detain net fisted M fila bNNg PREPARED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSRMS.NG tB THE BA95 FOR THIS NLAMNO 16 DRAWNG 510-11100.PREPARED dllbfiy Tan BY ADVANCED MMAGE SYSTEMS,NO. C-7 ' Jhtl®w Ph/rA1-6 8)9c 12/20/11 INLET 0 A a INLET D A 0 rd 4d 4d 24 ECONMAN Vd Vd Sd Wd.(`d Td rd 17� �ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN(l uuuuluuuuiuuuumuuuuiuuuu uuu �4� Yd Yd W-T. Td Yd 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0 Wd.rd Yd Yd 1)7HE IiASIS TKtS MANNO IS DRAWING STD-1001 V d 5 11/1 ll`�. I. mll-NING 0505aa 06 a u Up U01 ,mNrA& V �T DO"WO.IT V Vd Xd V-r. I-W Y� KAN MEN H-21i MM=&ATE - FES ed.0� Xd Yd rd. Ed Yd IIEGOB2410A Vdo ll' Yd N�T�OLJT mFxWlMOS 31S�� W� S� r� FRAME M2 SIX m WW1 WT MAIISION/ I I END CAF,VXST DOMISINXIT ADAI�� I)ONTItAMON Glt� I�m IN ffi� N�XNV. Tp" I On TO WTIET Fl E PIPE ImT� Si;K(0mc) 0 Gll� MAN 11OTTOM qQ lw� EDOWDRAN INS7AIATON DErAL NES WANAT)IM A* SIDE SECTION M • T INJECRON M0 WE IN&"ON 45.WW MOLDED WE W BEND TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM b F 1)CONCRETE: *.00D m WIN.APTEA m DO& Fm ppm P.f 2)NL RSNFORCOIEM PER ASTJ CI227-8.1 mLnlGmcn l� i ROOF I EAnER MIN.1%s5) SlC THE TRE DMIN=N IIES W fl.."&VM CLEANOUT DETAIL KTA ...WK DTFIA NFAn 4 NiN, NM tM M 20 fl'TH. —D WIN. PROPOSED Ir TH.LM PROPOSED ppyyFemr WYMWv IN NAXON:IT- mm Frn SOL WlEAE REWD A. WIN. r DEEP T.NA51F1®WI 4-6-1 r-4-6 ..0" IONDIT. 2PARMIAND. 4Y {Y 4 Mb MAL CIXLSIRIICBOl NOTES W,a w NAW A MONT M IDFIAOIAAI� me MY 4 M (3/4 CNIGEm VAI IIES A.Paw Y,STKVSD IIFIIASN (Mm 1r) MAI STONE) (WA,, AW) 4M -F__-______________-___ 4M Al`�MAX Win -r-- 46 Y0'=AVATION 4 W I Revisions M -----—----—------—-- 80 4 M I------------------�j M AT 1HIM FEET 60 B MAIN Tu 48 DRAIN TILE(0 MN) EMBED.] EMBED. (4-MIN) NO. ANNA VA VA lsamD wmi MDC TRAP GIZkMTY WALL wlnlW!D STONE WIS. N.T.S. �c PAIDwNm MNW (WIN.12-mi x) RETAINING WALL (WK iz*TNI) TYPICAL SECTIO MTs NOTIM, 1)T�SI=ON SHOWN FOR KANNING BOARD mtMITTING ONLY. DIETA��SANS WOURIED mm TO�"Olc 2)w,:ON SERBS SO RETAINING W�By�(I SKOFIFD. 001IRAANDS�Mmma TO S�a�ram� 5 X 3)MIMWM IOX WAU�MENT M 6%W�IS MEAM. -4KIGfiffin 4)MAIN�TO OAMWT AT "M ENDS.AND MW SW O.C. neering GrcuA LLC DR sSt�� En I 21 2'HARDWOOD POST mmO CONTROL Fmmc P.081.7061 MIN.LENGTH W 4' (MIRTH NO. IM OR EMAL). 100 Cwm*W CwY ,909224G AT V MAX O.(l S Tlc�IX TO POST AT 6'O.Q PROPOSED <�D 1C, Bevety,A(4 01915 � �y. MINK VOtDS AND OUIFNL O O O O O Tet 9789273111 T� OJwAl Fax 979-927-5103 OAVALL 2'.r.3W O O O C? MRM PROJECT 2.5'MIN28' HARDWOODSTMIES DA. PER RAN IN"M FlAn 5 '0' MANAGEMENT, LLC DMW 6,TO 11 1 ... DIA.pm PLAN 60-64 GROVE ST. Oft "w 11 41,11, 3 HARMONY GROVE 4 6- M MIK Ow� utsN W/ casT. 1.5,Win. EXCAVATE SAA�W • t L5 WA14 mmm By HAND .0am IDOSTNG DETAILS III ��I)Aix na� \-= m 2" INSTAL FABMC BUTT OFIADIES TGNmy TOM'Dim SLT Ilma 5 x PLAN'A \-M SIM EROSION CONTROL SECTION mp W-9, SCAX 1*-w NXS. OUTFALL DETAIL J&-N,-= C-8 N.Ta NN miNi,p/,/,4-6 2 2 .................. --------- .......... .............. ............ ............ 2 ........... -----------.......... ...........------------------ ....................... 18 ......... ... .......... ................ -----------.. ............... .................. 16 .................. ......... ....... .......... .......................... 14 ......... ............... 2 ..........--------- ------------- ............. w v. 8 ............ 6 ........- . ........... 4 .......... ... ......- 2 .......... ......... ....... ------ ............. as m.s"'amx'aaey .......... -- -2 ------- .......... ___.......y__.___..._.___._._..._._ BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION Onto 9emprpm Revisions lGriffin Engineering c�w f! P.O S.7061 100 QmwnhP 0-ftf,SAS 2246 BovellY.MA 01015 7et9789274111 Fax 978s27-510 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 60-64 GROVE ST. 3 HARMONY GROVE DETAILS IV scala r-o C-9 c\ ROPD GR NM Ifi/OT 3)T MAP IB LOT 236 t' G /i' erwx rarwM avl]D VIII eFw ]�� MMNWY GRGNE LMN !1•a 50 ORONE STREET AN EST,LLC LAND COURT PLM 3J613A NORTH RIVER CAAL7 TIDAL \ ma� s♦Pe eT wl —j_ ax T A rro 6 LOT 37e AUTHORITY NY GROW ,,.1An✓ ��`^^='A)�m.mv BAY ep ! e Poe TRANSPORTATION 6.),re�N6 .ORP. 1m m � elAw eroRx� x Yrs� ev CHUSETTS _ — .— = '� NR Exlsnwc _ sx Poc wm erawc em }°� °M s,eEv Dle uml OFFICE « w \ \ Ior »a• �°T� w 1 {er °�° fro 6UMING !Ntl Iw �Q ' Im mRA •LL enw rx ' ] 1 1 aw pec em e]�w »,eP ]IX Iro la !ro { a 6UIIro x w/GARAGE uRGo] ?m erowm aReN 1 mN=p 4AL MeV ne m at ewle,orwEE JrA 14],7 vizal PROP LAI T4 w91 ) D em�m aDr !�_ ee mMm e,s w��u�l33 L.o'f` ro °NN' x ]16,Fi_23.o !lam ,FDp 1 W/o�qq WILOWo sx IeN W m. wuY eTGAM1YiJ lINaB l e1NbN�,NK• IIOImmp9 311E �, ]m 147-j;j�N6ER f,®1 MPS ° IPA �� / »IRt Q¢iono 6n )M »»ta Ie1] iM . . • .. .].VII ♦,)m �IAI IRti L°b PF""o[Y 6UI� °g1e�I D4T ^ m'a11iRre a6¢36�m pT • !Yr D 6Ja l Nm' W/OAR(47 LOmo 13 w wP kp (42-UNIISNOEN aM `taw Rq a •M �` BL'O eTGA,tle NL ep l6} f6r � �, we0 ]]N IA1 IW I,D »mM � )]&e C p is f d O @ f 16 LOT 217 W N s)aW 11A SAWES }Feat IKG aFN Slee ,j, _ ---_ �w��� YAP I6 LOT 216 ° euc xea ! SALVER N/r fLORES yYM 1N�T3lfi 1 ITI FLORES of YAP 18 I I TUCKER MM,B /26 - �— eros )�Jp•T % ITl 4� I LOT 20 1 I I I L]Ax UI] I �s m rw e l . y D MM 18 3 LONTP2�22� AkN REPL , YAP 16 R rasv LOT 220 N/F I MST J_ YM 18 LOT MATEYM 1fi I e MAP IH LOT 232 ,o LOiFfd IMM,b I LOT 231 /F r , LOT 360 LMOT M / co p l 8 I LANDEN NOX I I LOT 22V , I Q i MM I6 LOT 229 I Q, �EU� I N/F I I LAYERS , L /10 MM 16 T 234 PA N/F / V a Af 1 14{ I I CWLEY I 3 i BNIF ASH i 3 R055/20 I I� MM I6 M�MN PA L m yyE 1 LOT 23] J_ I ISPERIOAKOS -- - Iwm nxe 12 6 a BEAVER STREET O z e s GRAPHIC SCALE ir'DR»Yu ea®n. •fl 'p G m V ` n� (n LANDSCAPE NOTES (a Fn]) LTmTr &TANna;PLeN rERlm man Leel L rove°lmmnem eNow w Maar Lp»ala FatfAhHm]C'e ro rem rolmeer«olnT.T]E ]mm=,° n CMPKTGP p F£eKNNIX!FtM At10.lNf n4,EAl4 WTALLerYN m bCVl1 W PIep. ]. euE UID aReDND eramarem aPLaR wrEW40 e..., cor)o»,rove u,mT eomwa � U W Tma erarmuo wn xrsEPr eraoc•mrla amvrsN meowTNNaY}wm}r]vL r]c PLANT LIST .—InAIYm,1OORAw p' ! eu Puvr rarenu eruu ce],ax}wl wFcre Arm D•-•-� a1aav, I Ln ` Of KEY 0 DO? LG'IKN M1BeALPMnL}bf CFCN,IE IIEE C7 A 4)FVMM)b4lL M CGe N ACCCTAYl1•Y,X efl�9lep{P WrtKXMCL PPARIGE'+ LEV 2 binK LRWC4 4beEM Val vED! 6pF[ETI VW SERI IDIn@ NA}etalr .. (�. 1Np pio fYDOE RATER PIIHIM nM MMT PJD MD iFBP Pr PISAARerIIX]ANNA a » bml FPeoER FrYBR FW Y-TWT. .} J. eTYCM de wnFG ORAPPW.MR4Tw4 MMLL°Atl«RdMfM<10 AWalYre IW111»Ib)F K y I]ELMG]I®LC»LNF}pp LMM.'ll' LMWiJ}pTrL�IK s'-V 6YT ftPe lPl O J urtl xCEPra]CE 9Y Te VIER aM aaHe}6u�e'dVMN MbC a]nfNl'1mIC CMIXp�dR •-!I• , d p EE1LLe1�A WI4A DIPfM D'-Y'6W ]"a ]LW]nARW4w4LL mE wYRAV1EID FtRAPEMW 6PE.EdR DT 11F fLMFAC}GR aO 0.b Y EIGp»]!4R'If®bX Ntb}D' H2°iIOID gA9pL0 1p.eP PWJl l9 F0.LLdNe eT aCL9 Y Mltl]nIGX Z AF♦PMt a61YPLV,EE fERKO.DEADM.W,ni1ERL°L wYL1ACE°Ff8L1®1T}b f�JJJTUT Te IX- }� CRNmkPpL GaOmp' dW CAaFSB IXY.i}l9 ]�]hW� RIN]NS TmaW1mB REVA6W � / dIF}t ATME}COTE P@TPIR rEMCD.TE CPImYCICR wYL1(LiANfNY EC 6i FCMNYEL ACTUMI' MmT mYN]CQHLOIeI WI] DIF WILT IGAWr Q W - Af/YITAVT FpI TE WER ei ]{ 4LEi)I,eY 1RYGM11NCe VMt aERtl>YK,LFW' IKKM10prIMmi YG4 YOY IEle0.Y N9P »e MaEK JI1m L.R1ElED MMC/N' mRIF18D 0.T'Gp,DAK6Y ]b.}LYN1 FERRWI}P.,eRE, PpNJC MIEN F QC) .. a1f/LlY.D11ER YE.Y}RTWINO DQYtlD wN11 t8 Peb DwCT1ALL PWIIN]aeb IE W FlISYm' ElffiYm]YMTA „}� -B•pEPiN PAmwro MaYws les m urDTwrrt�wcttnYua ElDLeee NNemn vMxPae Buren u,DPaEme {•auKnE« fPao¢mraaman Br1mN O°'�^ < i, 1eR YD IEIB%1(JlLm iiCYfB}l RlV1tl' Rlwefir MlNW peK6Y ]b.l Cglf FNpN mRIDE F Z t IXp,N)l1EeE1MEE M8JER•ID°612 PRTFL,F°PPI4(AYML'IYN A}D wYll fd NY M ltleilT TuEM A.' YAA,e)AL,ATILW. WL}CCM Dm lm]nELN LMY 4'Q1e 1M 1£wWmenlrt 6 M OOERX f.AIIwICTCR IKM mW ql aD M «ND W DAYLLLr ]m.ifM] D14GILT W'AMT 'c NL xosu smY}+rrm• Pmart aaD uoere ]Meme. ePanea c ,r,D sm. Z < a e ,KVM%NE COIIRPCIGR m ILYp®fA,W PACE w T]!YCfAl1o:VD IRLLnEe a0 IFD p6 LE11C01112 Fo°I}eaV1A CRPAC,e• LRpeG,LDCODYR N1aCg1] HIIW 6PbE - j Fe°YAE ALL CL Q ¢g w4Ml.♦EIBI Te EgwE1YE<]O L0.'PMJI O GV®�Qfi fQ191W YD DY6M ]b� V nIYATLLf MR3OM CLtlYAlli•W enl6i(W% WI.ItM] 4' I'erLL 4R WTA I-+ Q£RATIQtl TE Le`G}CAFE CGMPOGIGR eXY11ERe2 qe IEPYR meD®.PAN p, M J ]YwICIY MiJnbY WEEIm4Y WdtlW w-m WT pm}M Mn gLT,MS elYT,s °bMeIYRM a Y [J YWl[e,0lm»i,EfG DMVIhDNrElOp1MV2 V}11p J,.y AT]b ACpMLLL Giro T@ rA p FANIe AfIAMe taC0.iLE D1EFOR L ♦ Fq?1 TOPS C]}eR M fe rNm NpPe aD1RIN F9e .'-m WL FIIYhE ALL 18}AL GR I])]h•— Fdbl3µy W M. 'W 10 09 PKEe Q%PK1 mOIAV eMem '-T FJN!dIDJMd,YPAP ge,YNl eoiBlp a W, (f a eu eNne eece ewu eE naam w,Nr utwl w)eDDm DAIa evvew p)»c MEAL rnf a PPS.Aonorxe e6RfvN mlelm Px Wr liw,whanzT ]wx4'oax mew am, Q Qa u Fce ! ncen oncw]A eeRfuv EP»rz• -m WT euu cwxe]mm3 pao)EL rmm):m U }p a"" m. r1m epxmAawe e1w.L PPONDe{•tan Fat au e)mm ro s ecopm oA�. PCC s rL�A ononKA ekTOW,erwee w'r•Wr eaormieme m ePecw® f/3 U� d i `u PLA]RM Arab evuA loe¢na D•mum rwcpe»a teen,1m I.urowe m,macT« T » Pf2A NtlBp ccEoneDD ePwcE s'-T Wx FEWEIDW Pec+El ]m{•}neD mas ° a wYLL Ca'eAWre tlm4PADe rIEAIPerKN n,M Te eeEAX CMWLI4RFWRiTo Re m PND1'bl0 6Y°pCIXFpGpr1 »1Yr ]rbFlr®CYIBD ✓py mly w,vLM)rm0t nw m• 0 .LOAN, rAI » »n°aDeDMN xue De rl:me' maaz ce 1er2 wJxwetW.,+ ».fv eaapal rmlvC! �gp] Z 0 IR » b'M NBNYIA NRYMFCGE r.r Ae eF4GimD MrILL MMFD ao wRe TO TIEEe PTa KLL»ImY mRn a W n un CevWlY)1 RLZ1 T1a 41gGWE FtuL JCypM ryNr LCCATIfly a6PL,Yw BRE w m eI1pW RmDIAU MRr enK' MCR/eEK IIEB taeC r-}11•fL L,la l2Emwe)mrul]IR1 o@. Jo Jn(210 i� m Q aumm oR eaortlw wwu@RlNplm ew elsalrED er rem a»]aera LArmeoere ep m erwxa unww ENpgtl• eNpam ePaYP1 »mss• LrN]rW11N}ta«ra]meXpamLr rsw.ma]rnm,veaJacrm wme eFmreor]ao rwKlr•u anNDwn,PeMLwLe/rleemro MTAwxN«ene Ir » errery ro.,ua,am ue r°»Kn tuc `.'Wr DECIDUOUS t EVERG�EN SN6 fna rux]M uceTp]mcwPmeEDwv}a wo]IET,Lroee Texnsn eoue a °IEIe eDGerEDCn rLLV PLL4fMeCn nIX11)@Fde relElMlu um A'MY1.0.fAR CFD TO M VOeMMtaBllµ NRiM• NYheDVT°Wtb uTfYWT' AR?ro awL uaae,aFam Pa+p*o Peon.wl rane°Puaw]n merro».uo ae NOT to 6CALE {PeTaDIE Furs Alm raalF®EES p»Ex}•uLwoe ae Dore sulE v PARI vonKunr}a PEMIR eT vame w}Kee}uT em wmwmnm lRn,maL-w,rEo - DECIDUOUSp€ECIDUOUS TREES mD6n e'N,mr,r e'nm r.w oAomrtvwew neN)a Drs carver.pnorlt eaw ro A cenx a a Iuee . EVERGREEN TREES Te Nlemvr.u,mw SHEET 7 OF 1 = NOT TO 60ALE REVISIONS --- wo REV # DATE BY: _-_ Ll r- D )Dna/) ) J.P. / - N GR��„E)RDA _ ----- ---� aElo O CURS NARMO WPI" - itx19 (P°BUG - `\ ❑1- F F 25'WDE SB/SH ED=i W \ SEMER (HLD LINE) F L9 W \ EASEMENT Z� J 1E -- --- Som (n -HAP 16 LOT 3A N/F SB/OH \\ \ m 3 HARMONY GROPE AS k HLO CORP. \ MM 16 F 238 '�F 3 D.• t' X NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDA- L / \ \\ SO MOW COURT REAL EST,uc m 0 3 \ LAND STRT PLAN L EST, 0 d �g3 Gl� 7 EMSIING GROSSM .• l., .., Lz lr U m _ T_ EASEMENT EXISTING T EQ -MA GE 16p /LLOeT 33)8 i b. t s 3.a ABUTMENTS \ � Q' - HARM pNpRYRp&�HM� E.' b.o b.. b.. .• b.e b.0 n.. E.v x b. L !.x Es La Lv L. E.o b.e b.. 6.. n.. 4 1.. 1.. L. iz b.o l., i.z 4.a IA l.e Ee 1.•1 b.. E.• a, b.o bw b.o V. I.o b., b.. b.a D.. b.e I.o D.o b.B E.e b.o b.o E.o b.o b.e L• b.o Lo �6o b.• a., b.o Cyn-b.a� E.v Da b. .•..1.•lvTR-bw-b.v b.a D. 1 t• l., E.a D.. lv b.v BA).b.v lv Lv D.z D., 1.a L. n.a D.v b.• b.o 1.• l.• l.B b.e b.o L� p.e E.o b.o D.e b.o E.e D.o b.o b. b. to b.o D.v v v s • b.n b.e TRANS��ORTA�ION- J - c s R.R. TRACKS 'AU' y J g ` SSACNUSETT ' ----- . ... O MA n., b., a..I t .F"v.rt.�.;,.-t.�}��EP eT.oT.•T.aT.aT.,T-\ y E.v e. IIA l.. a.. b.a D.o 1., b.. I.. e. D.v b., b., b.v II, Ll b., b., I.• Le 1.x l.. }.e s.x L, l.• S.v l., b.. I. D.x Lz D.a b.. ■ Fa '1� -� -_-_-_--__ II- N �Tb7a-6.a bn L. .a s .a D.+ ba l.. L. i. ].e b.•� i �, la b.o L• Lo D.. ,. b.e b.. b.o lv b., b.a Es Da b.a b., 1, b.z L, , 1.v s bw b. L• b.a `A _ b.z E.• 1A ., L. l., b.x b.. E.• Lz t• 1• 1(.1�l.• L. IIA 1.1 1.2 l., 1.1 L, t, t.s %A 1.+ to tr La [TLt�L z 1, 111,\by La b.• b.• b.• l.e 1.0 l.• D. bw Ls l.• 1.• Lz D.• b, .a b., l.a D. n.` .a ].f n\ CEJ Q D.x Li 1., . ]s 5.. 1., L, l.• !., i ].. ] IJl.e b. a L• 1., b.• Da E.e D.a 1.• La 1.. E.. bo ba LT.1.2 .a ].:mil Y..=.• L.. bw .v 1 .o 1.. E.o Is b.v b.i EXISPNG a b.e b.z b.• L t 5.0 b., �� u a (nJ1't D'1'11 IIIJJJ ` GRA T o ,^i//• OFFICE 1 s • ].• In W ]., 1w La }a ] Sa !e t. bo b. La La 1. 1.. f.+ Sa ].a S.a L•T �IA'EPA .I-I=., p '6.Q� 1 t.a La BUILDING P'.II . 9.62 •� /✓L/j p b., l.a Dw 1.. Ls ba D.a PROPOSED SURDDIG h (; F� b.x b.e a L. 1.. 1., L. b., t. 1. L, 1.. 1. L. L, W/GARAGE UNSER , i. la 1, !.. to 1s-T.a y-.,T J,t..x bw b.,Abffl(E.,_ p z 6.o D A ..B ' .a .z D.: b., is .z , 5.z b.v\ Z (q-UNITS) [ \ b.a L, L, L• to b.a b.z b.a b., E.• 1., t, l.• 1, r 1a 4.1 1 1.i �� 3., 1.v ]., l.. L+9a�b,�•=.,��L.i-a ., b., b..lb.. b.z l.e Lz Flt 1'M.hL 1., to b., b.v b b.a E.a La , 6., 5.e La ].a b.v b., L. i. L. s t, .+ L l., W/GARAGEQI LUO/A'G 02 L2 L+ 1.a I.. to 1..},•�4.•�p.,=.e`t q L �A 0.gyl. L, I, t} Wba i•°'g.2, _' • b.e b.v E.a D. .a .a l.o 1.- !s !., (41 WOTS)N0� AEEt Blq'[P kEF WAIy --- - is b., be Iw i., :.. ]s 1.1.>•].V.A=6..lW T m zz l.np�b..v b., b., b., 1., I., I.. I.. a.. b.. as l., b.. 1., 1.,\,C\ a.. l.x ., x e vt` -1.- to MAP 1U T 21] �.�E.o�J:. .yL .a la L. b.. aw t• l.e b.z 6., ls, 1. 1.,V., 1.- ., bs t, b., D.x la a., a.z a.x I.s b.• 1. Lx l., L, L, ' 6.. ., 6 - l., 1. F'R/OPO ED ANG s S.a E., D.a b.a t.vh�ia`. a.o L. a.• � O SARKES ` `� ba L: La Dn 1. ` -'tI-Lfy.�b.. I, 1.r b:)-b[-t3-ts-6s L. I., I., Lz 11.2 1.1 11.2 b.• .1 l.• t• i W (.,AGE°mu 1.x Lx La E.v b., b.a bs .P D.o b.. ` O l.a 1A 1• l.. l., 1 1.a l., 1.. 1.. I.. L. l., l.. l., 1.. , 1.a L. 2 4� _W, l.. La L, b.a bw 6, l.a .a - - to D.a a., D.v D.a b.o b.. m SILVER YAP 16 LOT 218 b., I, I. I., 1.s L. b.e n.. 1., Lx V. 1., !. t, L, L. a., , L, _ - - - (PU6UC WAYFLORES b.. D., f.a 1.z i., D.. l.. b.• L, ]., ]., L. L t.a Sa Ls S.z La , La lw la a _l.3 l.­lrys 5.. L, 1, Le D.e as ba•a., b.. •: - .• Lx b.+ L, 1. Lv 1.. 0 i V) YAP 16 LOT 316 1. bs Lv b a A��1g��i-�1s Ie yL�.i,..l.,2.� b.• is De L. 1.5 La ., La .. z La iw L 1. t s b., L_Ls i.x L, Lz 1.a y H �r1) FLOWS aII1^�^ 11I'� Ir M �. _ a 1., }., It. D.. 8m1.1 tl.,��//LD--•• ., b.a b.a 5.z 6., Es L. L e b.• 1.,WLz in t, , .z - -II 10 ., S.a ].v 1.• la l.• b b.. l.• i nlTl �3 YAP 16 1 1 TUCKER MM 18 120 X2 Q I LOT HA 1 1 I 1 LOT 22) 1 -- La Lz ., L, Ls T.. p.• b t, dt. b�a P6., b.. be I., I.. i., tv L+ I., 11., 1.4 to 1.. L. .v }., v.a L. La E.• n., Ds Lz I. . b.o b.o 1.1 y�W [I Ifi N/F I 1 N/E J I.Y T 2 R LOT 222 AEN REAL UIYSOR b.a L, 6, b., L• is 1.a b.. b., La b., b., D.s 5., .x Ex Lx Lx b.z La Dp,sb.o b.• W LOi 216 u ry� ESTgIE ''ILII I1ptA HIT T MST I MAP ifi ' I )- I . I I • WgLL I -tea,.--_ ,.m L J I� m 144 1 I LOT 224 1 Q MAP 16 LOT 229 Q 1MAP 1 LOT 2301 LOT 2IS 31 tae 1 1 coNt£i' I I 3 I H/F 3 1 /F 1° MAP be LOT 232 I,rn CTL weBB L Q I DEMEsRE I ROSSCD I. N/G 1 WAR 16 yAP I6 L'LrL'L/ V J40 11 _I BASH M1ER5 I L 1 I 110 MAP 16 LOT 234 LOT 360 LOT 216 a ICONO WT. 1 I 1 MAP I6 N/F N/F N/F / -- 914 I P LOT 23] MCSMGpN PAT1150N PA BEAVER STREET - ER1p 05 _- --- - GRAN. CL (PUBLIC WAY 30'IHOE) -- POST FND Calmlatlon SARCAry 7 a ',I IaCel Unita Avg Hax Mln Avg/Mln Nax/Hln PLSpCLr P[SpCTb O W 1.' APARiIffibl PARttiHG AUS mDVF ec 1.20 'l.s 0.1 12.00 75.00 35 15 J W Of CUMBRCIU.PARANG Fc 1.03 6.3 0.1 10.30 63.00 < O L,zmloaire SUeWla / WL88901 RARMRIy GROVE APARSIUST5 SAIGH' HIS PN: HOI PLEASE GLL US FOR PRICING AT 1-800-633-8]11 ) L E SymWl O[y L.Gel Lumens LIF 4acrlption L S 13 HBEU ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, ALL DIMENSIONS AND L..NIRZ0NB A 14000 0.800 S- P-S-5-IS0-CMFG 20' ROOMING MIGHT 0 1 SHOWN REPRESENT RECOMMEND POSITIONS. THE ENGINEER AND/ORAHITECT B 19000 -J-150-C®-F20' IIDUNTING EIGWI MUST OETERMINE.APPLIC4BILRY OF THE LAYOUT TO EXISTING OR FUTURE FIELD Hm SON -�{1_� THIS LIGHTING p-� 19 C 11000 6.e60 WLS-NP-E-3-150-CI®-ft, 20' IDUBTtNG 86IGffi - 1 THIS LIOORY PATTERN REPRESENTS TROLLED ON LEVELS CALCULATED D FROM INDUSTRY DATANDA DTAXEML-AM TINDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS WITH ILLUMINATING I CMRREMi ® 16 0 19000 0.800 Mf3-RA-S-3-150-CL'8-FG 16' D)JUN'ftNG HBIGBT IN ENGINEERING STANDARD TAMP RATINOVER SIN ACCOODS, ACUTE WITH PERFORMANCE OF J MANUF CTUR SOCIETY APPROVED METHODS, V.FHA PERFORMANCE OP ANY TOLERANCE ACTU RERB LUMINAIRE MAY V ARI DME TO LD CONDI IN ELECTRICAL VOLTAGE, TOLERANCE IN LAMPS AND OTHER VARIABLE FIELD CONDITIONS. Associates, Inc Consulting Structural Engineers One Autumn Street Portsmouth, HH 03801 8639 Fa. (63) 1 — 2 811 ww.seng.co 0 'cho 'co ON Up CO VN O f ycU� 2 `a C Sq6 _^m MSI rn l a cn n 6N ®a� y �w <m YN The Federated Companies 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 Boston,MA 02116 MRM Project Management 3 Broadway PO Box 388 Beverly,Me.01915 Multifamily Development 47 Unit Building •�' Salem,MA Preliminary Date:ED CecanMl, ]011 Dan D 0 IeML BY: bi bJWi- an Approved BY: _ Revisions rvanr¢ First and Second Floor Plans ALL Rv,lxt No: 101103 K• IT W II' y _ Associates, Inc Consulting Structural Engineers One Autumn Street Portsmouth,NH 03801 (60) 433 — 8639 Faa: (603) 4J1 — 2811 ..A.lsneng.com 0 _ o Q 0 0 Q , Q O O nl 0 (j7 O ON O p 0 .p p 0 o p _ A SIR R - -NRTAflCIL E M XM XK 110 STAIR M Ole 1-Wt flYI091IRE - _ F PR I U 4 - --• -----� 0 - r r O - �_ r Cl- 1�— `oW ap72 �N Al. tF SN p O 7 z.m ig m I i The Federated Companies II'- • n'- • IY- 535 Boylston Street ,„�,E Suite 203 Boston,MA 02116 ] q Al. MRM Project Management a,„„.• 1I'- _ 3 Broadway 1 i 1 PO Box 388 Beverly,Ma.01915 Multifamily Development 47 Unit Building ------ -- - Salem,MA IR 4 z-1STAR,ApgpFapE 104 la la IW IS McTAI RE ' I I los _ ___________ _ ____ loa m O Preliminary — --. ---aOR ----- O Ir p o \ , O - ST ' ® _ _ - O 4 AS'RE L o O o O � nate: I I Scale: - _ Drawn By: biwal— Apprmed By: _ I I - 1 I - Revisions I I I II I I 4 - 3 A10 a.q F FlootSecond Plans A,. A1 .2 P JS,t No- 101103 _ Associates, Inc Consulting Structural acemse% Engineers One Autumn Street Portsmouth. NH 03801 (603)133 — 8639 F..: (603) 131 — 2811 a.,meng.com H HER 0 ao ko $N U� C ifl ON U1� U �m � C q�q . 8< xa VqW, m F wl ®R KN IMI 9�IL 9 O CQ I I I I I I � •� �N I I I I I (D .z cN I I I I I I (D .2 n'P I I I I I I tg `cl WIN xr — -------- --- — -- ------------ — — -- The Federated Companies 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 Boston,MA 02116 MRM Project Management 3 Broadway _ PO Box 388 Beverly,Ma.01915 Multifamily Development 47 Unit Building Salem,MA Preliminary Dale: Cevn6c, tan Scale: w NoteE Dnwn9y. bjb/jen . . -Apgovd By: I I I 1 C5 I I Revisions I I I I n I Exterior Elevations A2. 1 R jct Nm 101103 Associates, Inc. Cwsullinq Structural Engineers IXAa'IER9TTP. One Autumn Bt Portsmouth038, HH 03801 433 — 8639 Far.m (6(603) 431 _ 281/ wv.pneng.com o° Qo ON �a .q Y co VN or F U Vc'n C at om ROE®O a:eoi o V „ K 180.®9m Y6 —I -------------- The Federated Companies 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 Boston,MA 02116 MRM Project Management 3 Broadway PO Box 388 Beverly,Ma.01915 Multifamily Development 47 Unit Building MEEM Salem,MA Preliminary Data: Ikcmibc, IDII Scale: no Hoted Draau By: bjbJ— Appmved By: _ I I I I I I I I I I I Revisions I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I Exterior Elevations A2.2 �,-t w. 101103 SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE / 976-741-4683 December 3, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Danielle: As requested in connection with the above project, enclosed please find two sets of full sized as-built plans dated November 6, 2012, prepared by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC, together with a CD of the plans. If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, dseph C. Correnti Enclosures ■ l EJ DEC 0 3 2012 AnA DEPT. or 0A&AU&,1 i Y V NIS& 4R G ------------------------------------------ <l6 iqi '4 t SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET Mme SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970Qry(� �' JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. SEP 15 1` IZ TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI DEPT OF PLi-,NNING FACSIMILE COMMUNITY DEVELOPIW1£6d'T7 4I-4 s 8 3 September 25, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Danielle: Enclosed please find the following documentation, for submission: 1. Letter from Griffin Engineering Group, LLC dated September 24, 2012, addressing the breakdown of residential use square footage on the Overall Site Layout Plan, two copies of which are attached to the letter as Sheet C-3, revised September 19, 2012; and 2. Letter from Griffin Engineering Group, LLC dated September 24, 2012 containing two copies of the Power Point slide presentation presented at the Planning Board hearing of September 11, 2012. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. dtruly yours, ph C. Correnti Enclosures Griffin Engineering Group,LLC September 24, 2012 Mr. Joseph Correnti, Esq. Serafini, Serafini, Darling & Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Proposed Salem Oil & Grease Site Redevelopment 60 & 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road Slides Presented on September, 11, 2012 Dear Mr. Correnti: Please find enclosed two copies of the slides used during subject presentation to the Salem Planning Board. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any questions or comments, or require additional information. Very truly yours, Griffin Enginee ng Grou LLC Robert H. Griffin, P Enclosure: 2 Sets of September 11, 2012, Slides (10 pgs) Cc: MRM Project Management, LLC (Letter & Slides) Phone 978-927-5111 1 Fax 978-927-5103 1 www.griffineng.com �MGriffin Engineering Group,LLC September 24, 2012 Mr. Joseph Correnti, Esq. Serafini, Serafini, Darling & Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Proposed Salem Oil & Grease Site Redevelopment 60 & 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road Residential Space Calculations Dear Mr. Correnti: As requested at the Planning Board's September 11th meeting, please find enclosed two copies of the Overall Site Layout Plan (Sheet C-3) for the subject . project (revised through 9/17/12) and additional detail regarding our residential space calculations. The MRM site has a total land area of 296,650 square feet (6.81 acres). The hatched area on Sheet C-3 indicates the residential use portions of the site. The hatched area measures 146,855 square feet in size, which is 49.5% of the total land area. We were requested to provide a breakdown of our residential use measurement which follows: Parcel Residential Use (sf) Parcel Size (sf) 3 Harmony Grove Road 4,799 35,561 60 Grove Street 0 26,946 64 Grove Street 142.056 234,152 Total: 146,855 296,659 We were also requested to provide the computer file which we used to measure the parcels and residential areas to the City Engineer, so that he could verify our calculations. We will email a copy of this letter and plan, along with the drawing computer file to Mr. David Knowlton. P.E. for that purpose. Phone 978-927-5111 Fax 978-927-5103 www.griffineng.com Mr. Joseph Correnti Page 2 Re: Salem Oil & Grease Site Redevelopment September 24, 2012 We trust the above is satisfactory. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any questions or comments, or require additional information. Very truly yours, Griffin Engine rm Gro , LLC Robert H. Griffin, .E. Enclosure: Overall Site Layout Plan (Sheet C-3) —two copies Cc: D. Knowlton, P.E., City Engineer (by email: Letter, Plan & CAD File) MRM Project Management, LLC (Letter & Plan) J ^LQ1 L SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENT LL 0� ATTORNEYS AT LAW FP, p Nie 63 FEDERAL STREET .� ^L^••((��`•" C1"' SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970A1 JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 October 1, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Danielle: Enclosed please find for submission two copies of the updated Operation & Maintenance Plan prepared by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC, revised through September 28, 2012 Should you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, L- 6osephC. ,orrenti Enclosures OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN System Owner: MRM Project Management, LLC c/o Cabot Company P.O. Box 388 Beverly, MA 0 19 15 Party Responsible for O&M: The stormwater management system for this project is owned by MRM Project Management, LLC. The owner shall be responsible for the construction phase and the long-term operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system as outline in this Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan. Should ownership of the property chane the succeeding owner shall assume all responsibilities for implementing this 9 9 P P 9 Operation and Maintenance Plan. In the event the residential and commercial properties are severed from common ownership, each owner will be responsible for the stormwater management system on their individual parcels. In the event the residential building is conveyed to multiple owners, the owners shall establish an association that will have the responsibility of continuing the operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system. A legal document creating such responsibilities shall be recorded at the Registry of Deeds. Emergency Contact Information: • Salem Fire & Police (Emergency) 911 • Salem Fire Department (Business) 1-978-744-6990 • Salem Police Department (Business) 1-978-744-0171 • Salem Conservation Commission 1-978-619-5685 • Salem Health Department 1-978-741-1800 • Salem Public Works Department 1-978-744-3302 • Salem Engineering Department 1-978-619-5673 • Mass DEP (Emergency Response) 1-888-304-1133 • Mass DEP (Northeast Regional Office) 1-978-694-3200 Note: The system inspectors should note that drainage pipes, catchbasin, manholes, and treatment devices are considered "confined spaces"subject to strict OSHA standards regarding safe entry. Confined spaces present inherent hazards to workers. Only appropriately trained staff with appropriate safety equipment and monitors may enter confined spaces, and then only with a specific entry permit. Also, this work may pose hazards to workers, such as soft ground, flowing or standing water, snakes and rodents. Again, only appropriately trained staff with the necessary safety equipment should undertake such work. O&Mplan Rev. 9/28/12 1 Phase I: Construction Period Operation and Maintenance Plan Following is the general sequence of anticipated construction events: 1) Install proposed erosion controls and construction entrance. 2) Demo existing buildings and abandon all existing on-site utilities. Contractor to remove or plug all existing outfalls to the North River Canal. 3) Clear site and grub areas as they become necessary. 4) Install underground utilities. Construct southerly retaining walls and bring parking areas and building pads to rough grade. (Note: Do not install frame and grates/covers on the drainage structures until the fine grading phase. Provide large metal plates over the precast openings and burry as required.) 5) Excavate and install building foundations and adjoining retaining walls. Install building utility services and backfill foundation to rough grade. 6) Construct residential apartment buildings, main access bridge, and renovate existing office building. 7) Install frame and grates/covers to finish grade. Vacuum all precast drainage structures and install and maintain geotextile filter fabric in all catchbasin grates until final paving. 8) Install bituminous pavement binder course. 9) Install curbing, sidewalks, and landscaping. 10) Install final pavement, signage and striping. Installing and maintaining comprehensive erosion controls during construction is critical to the protection of the adjacent resource areas and the proposed drainage system. Following is a list of erosion control measures to be taken to protect the North River Canal and the proposed drainage system during construction. 1) Install haybales and silt fence downhill of all proposed work area as shown on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C-4). 2) Install the Grove Street construction entrance and silt sacks in the existing Grove Street catchbasins as shown on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C-4). Site access is only to be achieved from this location until the proposed bridge and binder pavement has been installed. O&Mplan Rev. 9/28/12 2 3) Temporary soil stockpiles shall be encircled with haybales and stabilized with erosion control matting or temporary seeding, depending upon the proposed duration. 4) Stabilize all disturbed areas as soon as practicable. Provide temporary stabilization of soil to be exposed for a long period of time (i.e. one month). 5) Install erosion control matting on all proposed vegetated slopes greater than 3:1 (H:V). 6) All erosion control measures are to be inspected weekly and after each rainfall event. Additional erosion control materials (i.e. haybales, silt fence, filter fabric) are to be kept on site and readily accessible as required. 7) Sediment accumulation up-gradient of the haybales and silt fence greater than 6" in depth shall be removed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable regulations. 8) The stabilized construction entrance shall be inspected weekly. The entrance shall be maintained by adding additional clean, angular stone to remove the soil from the construction vehicle tires. If soil is still observed leaving the site from construction vehicle tires, adjacent roadways shall be kept clean by street sweeping. 9) Dust shall be controlled using on-site water trucks as required. 10) All erosion control measures shall be maintained, repaired or replaced as required or directed by the owner's engineer, the City Engineer, or the City Conservation Agent. 11) The contractor shall comply will the Erosion Control Notes listed on the project drawings (Sheet N-1) Part II: Long Term Operation and Maintenance Plan The stormwater management system is a series of catchbasins located at low points within the paved parking lots. Stormwater collected by the catchbasins is conveyed through water quality treatment devices prior to discharging to North River Canal. Stormwater runoff from the residential building rooftops is collected by gutters and conveyed by downspouts and roof leaders to the sites drainage system. Runoff from some rooftops and a portion of the paved parking lot is conveyed to an underground stormwater infiltration field. O&Mplan Rev. 9/28/12 3 To ensure optimal performance of the stormwater management system, routine inspections and maintenance should be done at frequencies specified below. An Operation and Maintenance Plan Schedule is attached form documenting compliance. Paved Parking Surfaces—As part of normal site clean-up and as discussed in the Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan, debris is to be removed from the parking lots as it accumulates. Weekly patrolling for litter is recommended. Sand from winter ice and traction control should be removed semi-annually (ie. during early spring and late fall). Significant oil leaks should be swept up and disposed of using oil-absorbent materials as they are discovered. Any oil spills or leaks that reach the catchbasins must be reported to the Massachusetts DEP oil spill hotline. Catchbasins & Drain Manholes - Remove the grate or cover and visually inspect for corrosion and structural damage. Inspect pipe inlets and bottoms for signs of infiltration or inflow. The grate or cover and hoods on the catchbasins should be inspected on a quarterly basis during the first and year and semi-annual thereafter. Cleaning of the catchbasins should be done on a yearly basis and by a vacuum truck or clamshell. The contractor is to take care to avoid damaging the catchbasin hood. While cleaning, if a layer of oil is observed floating on the water surface, place an oil-absorbent pillow on the surface, allow to soak and remove. Repeat this process until the oil layer is removed. Alternatively, have the oil layer pumped out by a licensed disposal contractor and appropriately disposed of. The oil absorbent pillows must be drummed for disposal by a licensed disposal contractor. Stormceptor Water Quality Treatment Device —A copy of the manufacturer's Owner's Manual is provided at the end of this section which contains the required operation and maintenance procedures for the treatment device. The device should be inspected for corrosion and structural damage on a quarterly basis during the first year and semi-annually thereafter. The device also should be cleaned on a yearly basis and in accordance with the manufacturer's procedural recommendations. MDC Trap—The traps should be visually inspected for corrosion and structural damage on a quarterly basis during the first year and semi-annually thereafter. Inspect pipe inlets and precast structures for signs of exfiltration, infiltration or inflow. The traps also should be cleaned on a yearly basis and in accordance with applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations including M.G.L.c.21C and 310 CMR 30.00. A licensed disposal contractor should be commissioned to pump out the oil layer on a yearly basis. The oil is to be removed using a small O&Mplan Rev. 9/28/12 4 i portable pump and separately contained and disposed of. Infiltration Field—The site stormwater infiltration field has been provided with inspection ports on each row of infiltration chambers. Initially inspect the stormwater infiltration field after each major storm events (greater than 1-inch) to ensure proper function and stabilization. Record the water level over several hours to check infiltration performance. After the first year, inspect the infiltration field on a semi-annual basis. Inspect for apparent signs of silt buildup or clogging. Snow Storage Area—The parking lot has been designed with snow storage areas along the edges. There should be ample storage areas while maintaining reasonable travel lanes and parking areas. In the event of significant snow accumulation, snow can be placed along the westerly portion of the site. Debris from melted snow shall be cleared form the site and properly disposed of at the end of the snow season, no later than May 15tH O&Mplan Rev. 9/28/12 5 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN SCHEDULE ; Project: Grove Street-Apartment&Office Buildings Project Address: 60 &64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road Date: 10/21/2011 (Revised 9/28/12) Party Responsible: MRM Project Management(or Successor) Annual Maint. Budget: $15,000 Task Description/Schedule Maintenance Est. Annual Inspection Activity Maint. Cost Date: Inspector: Perform sweeping of paved parking areas and walkways Sweep, power after spring thaw to remove any traction sand applied broom, or vacuum Street Sweeping during the winter months. Also, perform sweeping during paved parking lots $6,500 late fall to remove any leaf litter and debris. and walkways Inspect grates, covers, and hoods quarterly for the first Catchbasins & Drain Vacuum Deep Manholes year and semi-annual thereafter. Also, inspect pipe inlets Sump Annually $4,500 and precast structures for infiltration and inflow. Stormceptors Water Inspect covers, inlets, and plastic insert quarterly for the Vacuum Deep Quality Treatment first year and semi-annual thereafter. Clean yearly per $1,250 Device Manufacturers' recommendations Sump Annually Inspect covers quarterly for the first year and semi-annual Vacuum Deep MDC Traps thereafter. Also, inspect pipe inlets and precast Sump Annually $750 structures for infiltration and inflow. Inspect after each major storm even (>1 inch) for the first None unless Insp. Infiltration Field year and semi annually thereafter. Record water level Warrants over several hours. Otherwise Debris from melted snow shall be cleaned form the site Snow Storage Area and properly disposed of at the end of the snow season Clean Annually $2,000 (by May 15th). Inspectors Notes: OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN System Owner: MRM Project Management, LLC c/o Cabot Company P.O. Box 388 Beverly, MA 01915 Party Responsible for O&M: The stormwater management system for this project is owned by MRM Project Management, LLC. The owner shall be responsible for the construction phase and the long-term operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system as outline in this Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan. Should ownership of the property change, the succeeding owner shall assume all responsibilities for implementing this Operation and Maintenance Plan. In the event the residential and commercial properties are severed from common ownership, each owner will be responsible for the stormwater management system on their individual parcels. In the event the residential building is conveyed to multiple owners, the owners shall establish an association that will have the responsibility of continuing the operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system. A legal document creating such responsibilities shall be recorded at the Registry of Deeds. Emergency Contact Information: • Salem Fire & Police (Emergency)- - - 911 • Salem Fire Department (Business) 1-978-744-6990 • Salem Police Department (Business) 1-978-744-0171 • Salem Conservation Commission 1-978-619-5685 • Salem Health Department 1-978-741-1800 • Salem Public Works Department 1,-978-744-3302 • Salem Engineering Department 1-978-619-5673 • Mass DEP (Emergency Response) 1-888-304-1133 • Mass DEP (Northeast Regional Office) 1-978-694-3200 Note: The system inspectors should note that drainage pipes, catchbasin, manholes, and treatment devices are considered "confined spaces"subject to strict OSHA standards regarding safe entry. Confined spaces present inherent hazards to workers. Only appropriately trained staff with appropriate safety equipment and monitors may enter confined spaces, and then only with a specific entry permit. Also, this work may pose hazards to workers, such as soft ground, flowing or standing water, snakes and rodents. Again, only appropriately trained staff with the necessary safety equipment should undertake such work. O&Mplan-Revl Rev. 9/28/12 1 Phase I: Construction Period Operation and Maintenance Plan Following is the general sequence of anticipated construction events: 1) Install proposed erosion controls and construction entrance. 2) Demo existing buildings and abandon all existing on-site utilities. Contractor to remove or plug all existing outfalls to the North River Canal. 3) Clear site and grub areas as they become necessary. 4) Install underground utilities. Construct southerly retaining walls and bring parking areas and building pads to rough grade. (Note: Do not install frame and grates/covers on the drainage structures until the fine grading phase. Provide large metal plates over the precast openings and burry as required.) 5) Excavate and install building foundations and adjoining retaining walls. Install building utility services and backfill foundation to rough grade. 6) Construct residential apartment buildings, main access bridge, and renovate existing office building. 7) Install frame and grates/covers to finish grade. Vacuum all precast drainage structures and install and maintain geotextile filter fabric in all catchbasin grates until final paving. 8) Install bituminous pavement binder course. 9) Install curbing, sidewalks, and landscaping. 10) Install final pavement, signage and striping. Installing and maintaining comprehensive erosion controls during construction is critical to the protection of the adjacent resource areas and the proposed drainage system. Following is a list of erosion control measures to be taken to protect the North River Canal and the proposed drainage system during construction. 1) Install haybales and silt fence downhill of all proposed work area as shown on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C-4). 2) Install the Grove Street construction entrance and silt sacks in the existing Grove Street catchbasins as shown on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C-4). Site access is only to be achieved from this location until the proposed bridge and binder pavement has been installed. O&Mplan-Rev1 Rev. 9/28/12 2 3) Temporary soil stockpiles shall be encircled with haybales and stabilized with erosion control matting or temporary seeding, depending upon the proposed duration. 4) Stabilize all disturbed areas as soon as practicable. Provide temporary stabilization of soil to be exposed for a long period of time (i.e. one month). 5) Install erosion control matting on all proposed vegetated slopes greater than 3:1 (H:V). 6) All erosion control measures are to be inspected weekly and after each rainfall event. Additional erosion control materials (i.e. haybales, silt fence, filter fabric) are to be kept on site and readily accessible as required. 7) Sediment accumulation up-gradient of the haybales and silt fence greater than 6" in depth shall be removed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable regulations. 8) The stabilized construction entrance shall be inspected weekly. The entrance shall be maintained by adding additional clean, angular stone to remove the soil from the construction vehicle tires. If soil is still observed leaving the site from construction vehicle tires, adjacent roadways shall be kept clean by street sweeping. 9) Dust shall be controlled using on-site.water trucks as required. 10) All erosion control measures shall be maintained, repaired or replaced as required or directed by the owner's engineer, the City Engineer, or the City Conservation Agent. 11) The contractor shall comply will the Erosion Control Notes listed on the project drawings (Sheet N-1) Part II: Long Term Operation and Maintenance Plan The stormwater management system is a series of catchbasins located at low points within the paved parking lots. Stormwater collected by the catchbasins is conveyed through water quality treatment devices prior to discharging to North River Canal. Stormwater runoff from the residential building rooftops is collected by gutters and conveyed by downspouts and roof leaders to the sites drainage system. Runoff from some rooftops and a portion of the paved parking lot is conveyed to an underground O&Mplan-Rev1 Rev. 9/28/12 3 stormwater infiltration field. To ensure optimal performance of the stormwater management system, routine inspections and maintenance should be done at frequencies specified below. An Operation and Maintenance Plan Schedule is attached form documenting compliance. Paved Parking Surfaces—As part of normal site clean-up and as discussed in the Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan, debris is to be removed from the parking lots as it accumulates. Weekly patrolling for litter is recommended. Sand from winter ice and traction control should be removed semi-annually (ie. during early spring and late fall). Significant oil leaks should be swept up and disposed of using oil-absorbent materials as they are discovered. Any oil spills or leaks that reach the catchbasins must be reported to the Massachusetts DEP oil spill hotline. Catchbasins & Drain Manholes - Remove the grate or cover and visually inspect for corrosion and structural damage. Inspect pipe inlets and bottoms for signs of infiltration or inflow. The grate or cover and hoods on the catchbasins should be inspected on a quarterly basis during the first and year and semi-annual thereafter. Cleaning of the catchbasins should be done on a yearly basis and by a vacuum truck or clamshell. The contractor is to take care to avoid damaging the catchbasin hood. While cleaning, if a layer of oil is observed floating on the water surface, place an oil-absorbent pillow on the surface, allow to soak and remove. Repeat this process until the oil layer is removed. Alternatively, have the oil layer pumped out.by a licensed disposal contractor and appropriately disposed of. The oil absorbent pillows must be drummed for disposal by a licensed disposal contractor. Stormceptor Water Quality Treatment Device—A copy of the manufacturer's Owner's Manual is provided at the end of this section which contains the required operation and maintenancep rocedures for the treatment device. The device should be inspected for corrosion and structural damage on a quarterly basis during the first year and semi-annually thereafter. The device also should be cleaned on a yearly basis and in accordance with the manufacturer's procedural recommendations. MDC Trap —The traps should be visually inspected for corrosion and structural damage on a quarterly basis during the first year and semi-annually thereafter.. . Inspect pipe inlets and precast structures for signs of exfiltration, infiltration or inflow. The traps also should be cleaned on a yearly basis and in accordance with applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations including M.G.L.c.21 C and O&Mplan-Revl Rev. 9/28/12 4 310 CMR 30.00. A licensed disposal contractor should be commissioned to pump out the oil layer on a yearly basis. The oil is to be removed using a small portable pump and separately contained and disposed of. Infiltration Field—The site stormwater infiltration field has been provided with inspection ports on each row of infiltration chambers. Initially inspect the stormwater infiltration field after each major storm events (greater than 1-inch) to ensure proper function and stabilization. Record the water level over several hours to check infiltration performance. After the first year, inspect the infiltration field on a semi-annual basis. Inspect for apparent signs of silt buildup or clogging. Snow Storage Area—The parking lot has been designed with snow storage areas along the edges. There should be ample storage areas while maintaining reasonable travel lanes and parking areas. In the event of significant snow accumulation, snow can be placed along the westerly portion of the site. Debris from melted snow shall be cleared form the site and properly disposed of at the end of the snow season, no later than May 15`h O&Mplan-Revl Rev. 9/28/12 5 �X= tU?E mle ai u f4� 10"f=I'es 25' WIDE SE.S.D. SEWER - VEASEMENT GRO DE) CTMCAL 1 MAP 16 LOT]JJ M \ f YA lrt¢ yc mrinu �E MAP tN LOi 2]e / 00 Y 50 \ 1 PoeCP4"eaiT04 _w:]:LL HAauo"v caovE cow. I o-s.ox \ /R VA POMPU6\I 50 LAND STREET REAL EST.LLC ff�� / \ LAND STREET OURT PLAN L EST. cc o: NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL _ o 25 vnD �. i / +_-____rroap D- BE 3An1 V _ -IO1 V fiR pc6 /gA1LPPE1,A h, - EASEMENT ;,AA— p \ 1,A / y 6LATIO _ 0+/M UTFALL M3 V'dl B 1 B y EXISTING \�'PCTT RmcE ANMOW c \ ,f00�gUPEER DRAIN MANHOLE / EAST, WATER QUALITY r✓� a+ ABUTMENTS - ZpNE (ttP. U.N.O.)' AP 16 LOT 3]8 L RAILROAD STRUCTURE '% - - _ _ _ _ CATCHBASIN N/f -nr.Yp CROSSING _ _ aLRecL_ _� - ' HARMONY CACPY CORP." ggx.tl5 -EASEMENT T (rYP) BAY TRANSPORTATION R R- TRACvS AUTHORITY rN5 'Hi1i414!i41 rG`Ir�hHN!IHil+i`HI'HI^.":H HIW�hrHH'MHfIH4YH-4�H4Hi.HNh44:h!414WHiih'+i.-?F44i`i.H.H:HHH!4.W!W4-HfH.+1HIriHiilHr-H i4H4'hHH}fil-4n HHMFN1HIHuyµlr} yY ':IiHH41H1.'i1HH11N:-I41'MYHHH4Hi11HH+IrYHHh:H51iHlHH krt--HFI41.'. L, hlNfl'.11}i 6 uxe ETTS y ,H Its!1Y114kµ"' 'R#4✓{f *i'I 4HF.tiRi,4M:H`IWi41Hl.HWH-.+H'WH_14-i1e14-4.`iH4NHti i4ilihlh:'H4H h}+HFHNHHiM1+tHV4-kliti' a1Fli HiuhV F441hi.-111ii1HrH-FIH.4 WATER DUALILITT P••.N41:IilytiH�tHH41ti11h14o4H'Hi441aH+aHH`:i. M-IHIYHr. T'i!i}iY=—. _ _w9gR1141AUTY A _ — y "" MA55 kN�H,tT4wi,:�(IuHN41iN4lki- 61T. CONC. PATH _ _ _ _ _ _ OUTFALL STRUCTURE Tel OF ucro E STRUCTURE \ �OAsiHL re !H" kiAl yirhH4MH-1 - -�— p �p�� ` 1 p L4 ���_ OUTFALL H4� E%IeiINS p ° . h'ikt N4 H4k!H^ _� �p fl.� inc4 iE ' DR(rYP u.ra�o) � V AREA EOFFICE G ) OW OFFICE ( \a cone:PA6-�� �ORTry RI PE'R C, BUILDINe \ \ \� PRO/GAERAGE UDI BUIL \ =M� __ —_�-�� ANgL -T/OqL lAwrE oLccN —_ o Go I (47-UNITS) �� \ x CATCHBASIN MDC PROPOSED BUILpING RL�_s GRANp_E`C4! OUTFALL EI �f (TVP) TRAP �4]RAGE UNDER Rx _s Hlr CONS -'ASL OW I tatm _ din C P G I i., DRAT UI NT,) RLQ s_ -®per-ATH _Pl. 9.fir U-1 I NE T. W CATCHBASIN M' AIN PRO OARL a` GM/ C 12 `C ......o-p—pTTP p- N DRAIN QUALITY (4>�ElLD;NG TRAP Y _ -.-..— - \ /... D PFS Z 1 p S ( ) F °--p— x YAR OA'E TRENCH vq' MPP Ifi LOT 2 _ ` \ `\ ° ,. . .' ABU W/ SEO l)IN MD0. p WATERT ( `h CoN/i p__° sTRUCNRE _ QUALITY -I s/xe/z ppq"s[w[R n Mpc mAPs TO --u� STRUCTURE i. X17' SARNEs \ DRAIN MANHOLE No Oafe DescnpNon - e, '; ) (TYP. U.N.O.) I .� _ _ DRAIN _ _ Revisions MAP I6 LOT 218 v e a SILVER EOR — �� ° p (PUBLIC WAY RORES FILTRATION `��� ° - - r0 dVJ _4 _I _ - FELDW - B P 6 Loi MAP 16" _ \\\ ___ N o� :aA R39 r LOi 33S INSP CRiS `YARD ( ) SIN MAP Ifi OM M MPP i6 L r J6 ! J 'a N/F 01 33 ((23 SxcO DRAIN YARD A /�¢ MAP 16 LOT CONLEY I DAR BA N 3 x23 I I, 2 Lawsa+� - __ mi'l RORes L-_I ,y. RAIN BG y~ - �1Qr MAP 22 AEN/REAL I I i .... ALL N LL7 LOT 333 ESTATEMAP A MAP I6 LOi 33 _ ALI. OR I LOT 330 H NOHLDFERI TRUST I pEMEULE �fi LOi 232 pl P� ELANDEA /i .... IMAP Ifi N/F 192.CMC PIapNCr IISH I BIT. I e - MAP tfi LID x]9 N LOi/F I I ll3 �MAp 16 MAP 18 e HRs uAP Ifi or¢Js I f Q IIe-0 I IGOT 380 pC] 4 24. Ross 11' _� I� nP I6 Lor LOT 23a PA LOT w q'0 GONG. /F ld csM16GN I ' i SP RpA pS Griffin = GRA e BEAVER STREET N - - -. -1-7° taAN s (PUBLIC WAY- 30' WIDE) --� Engineering _ Group, LLC p_ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - P.O Box 7061 N s ° 100 Cummings Center,Suite 224G d Beverly.MA 01915 o' Tel:9 5111 Fax 915-92178-9275103 m a MRM PROJECT n OR ,,, MANAGEMENT, LLC oD SALEM, MA in 0 o OPERATION & DO " MAINTENANCE AD _ PLAN E m GRAPHIC SCALE Sulg,t-a' m m Job No 160 0&M S (IN FEET I FBI H,6 P/P/.I a , I Wm- 40 !t d DA&6/20/12 Y I� PARAPET = vm m A pn W a FLS n ® ® ® C MUQ e ® ® Ego M ® ® ® 10 KpW ¢ry "W oQ c� 7 r wm Er? m -Z FIIYY21 ® Q v^ The Federated Companies ELEV, 1N - - LEN s.a - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 QGANAL ELEVATION Boston,MA 02116 ECALE8' _ 1'-0• MRM Project Management 3 Broadway PO Box 388 sEE ceLOR REBDERIrxs Beverly,Ma.01915 F�PRGPP'ED YIATERIAt Legacy Park Apartments P"AP� Building #1 RWF - - -®—®----®- �- - Salem,MA - _ Date: 7nn2 F1 D..By: bjb eaten Y - - - - - - - Approved By: _ ® ® ® ® ® a FLWR z Revisions ® � ® trEE FM MI IM EU 10 9 ® ® FLWR _ ELEv, za.a EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS i MAIN ENTRY ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - SALE . A2. 1 EL � 130' -- .. FMJect Nei 3/15/2012 s LEGACY PARK APARTM ENTS MRM Project Management,LLC & The Federated Companies Noveniber 2011 a � 1 3/15/2012 .e 6wal.ltiiyJ � 5 p> ppR� tld nae P' TM (1{41{3 pab), (Lr00oM TOW WovkAW J• EebM11 488 as 1171 Wang 488 as 072 ion i 11111 u11 2.1" WAY=ww*aS Mak" r: EMerft IB 20 811 ExMng 88 J 81 Tobl 71 23 88 WON&AW EWMIWftokXw Eobrta 82 088 Ealerkg 98 18 111 Toby 811 S2 117 W�m1K-ILr.tlUY YYp L.MrM 2 3/15/2012 — r iox sox d ssx isx �a sox ggp? Lin4� 1 �" JC 3 3/15/2012 LT a �i ' �tl t �j Str a 414. �Jj �`VI a ay 4 Rec momended Roadway Improvements Grove Street at Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street - h� J�Rggy�ONYc%" . a�. a to c ,• '"} �.<� .a.� '; >�"� �� OA O ♦ .'.'S,r' _ ..tom ��� "'„IR° yh' 0� d� '�' ` s Recommendations and Conclusions 3/15/2012 z a Tet ii u 1 +,H R`. o Q7i1 oaf= 6 3/15/2012 1 a ' • 1 ff f : • 1 1 • • • a.. Z " ;;aha 1 • x t y, x w yx '�� t`& i �a� �✓ m stn "'-e,x X125, y 3 A Ti4 11 1AA It R • 1 f�''r��z�a°_.aJ • • 1 r •• • 1 �..1 • •• ki 1 • . _ _ w • h- 3 A^ 7 3/15/2012 1 1 k � ' � v i 4 / ay 1 1 1 1 1 ( d eJL f n ¢. S. w x • 1 dyne. T q 0 .� F mw X, ..� �.._• r 8 3/15/2012 • 1 � • 1 ue `y� Qk • 1 1 1 1 1 �'� }r ' vA S Q' 1 • • 1 x,�° }r Ly �' "^moi. v rt 3 5 { a ax 4« � t { t 9 3/15/2012 1 • mom„w: Y gar. _ 4 k d �L+XR�gy. 1 l fix a s x b S � fes^ • • � 1 1 1 • • • ���{rfl s t a sz o- 10 3/15/2012 • 1 x • • I r � � r o-s Ile 14 Ki k .i • � h4 �e • .�.�yy.��ask i '�' ''A w'tAa's rf�:��1y�•� '� � a w*S Yw, I Ik d II Y �` n } i z ' £.3 `' aj�y'rs�"d'�`fas`� ,:r ,, a saP{ �'"� �9�,''��•u'. SkS' � 11 3/15/2012 a `� • 1 • a • t * � A k. `{4 +bf 1 { + k hryy p F £iyt � 1 • 1 Sn3%2r±c� ''tFrKs€S'�*" ' x �mll kpV IVI A X PAY a .� td c ;}• ��'�y,r^* � �§.� V , r t s � t i(€ .,N a s��$. �x�}'���� a• `�t•��T ,aPnti zk � � d *3t '1AY 12 3/15/2012 v �'"F• gym= J u � s if�L4 13 3/15/2012 � � /L'� )�` v� ` s Ems• � � n: �4�l� •�q�� O w rxia ��Y N t. �r°b sF, em } �}} • 1 • Los I Lai ef, $ . , t i,.k �• { i e .fir rcxgr x*E igra 3�`�7,'`j 4 Q ,�. 4. � 1 • +�'�` #mom€�' 'zTy;ta j` • rxt aft � d '«�� b�' :A�ep,C� FaU. v x { • 1 • • �. . 14 3/15/2012 x Y � �x Y¢ `nYi St ��t5 k 4F A • ��� 3 ':'Y' ✓' d v '4. s%c� ' k,�' "`+` +- '�y'+ "k`�' 4 x is r 'ti N0t4IMU4 „q c 'tel* � • • • • '�2. i pl � x IN • . � � . yG u v. xmYf� ,;, "'`� =.. ��x »e i'x$`a•�'*q � t " 't^..^rs�xu*''�Kr - C�'sZ*�s`�.`_ s �� t ,r s 4s 3g x .3 z S6€ .'v`,3}h'`5' 15 3/15/2012 1 � � ki 4 ..vim 1 1 • ' 1 r 4� t � r 'Y t L dtI° e gm 1ls r p T pi SM1F 16 SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP h1AY 07 2 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW DEFT pF pt.:41`!tJIN & 63 FEDERAL STREET <ipAmuN111YUNcLDPIAENT SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 976-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 May 7, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Danielle: For your records, enclosed please find a colored copy of the Power Point presentation that was displayed at the Planning Board meeting on Thursday, May 3, 2012. If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. do rY Y trul Yours 4� I X seph C. Correnti Enclosures � I t n ! • S't `1S9r r q iqvm 1: "1 ?r e.. �r. 11 ----1-Yy � �r^.r`Rre„Pr rr rrr. ra rR rry N���nr MGr�, 5 L Rn ail allLl .:.A LEGACY PARK APARTMENTS ` SALLM Presented by: 5 MRM Project Management, LLC & The Federated Companies 60-64 Grove Street/3 Harmony Grove May 2012 Salem,Massachusetts Scale r=40' ,.y� ars-+ NAk' # +yas « "R' • r ^��*'#4... • .+a, ! + MO�y C. 1 �4th + 'a+= 4ieIa ' .•• �.,, �' � ykr:,fit°' ,' �:. .«x.� :.. ' �O�F/�� r , �.'. `•�#r �� � '.; ' " }�.,tl}r•, A '.', fig 3`' n 5 � ♦ n l''r. �qt"�. �'t� ,`' � .k c w ;,�4° -iE �Py NST'•+`�,r4 ..: sir 4a', ^ s'; � �� ` Y •� •� � � ��X W • � ��� •�� iia ; � � p ,c-.r "1" G�S� m � VC, � • � yam' G �$• . Mason Street 1 ntersect�� on (Ref: FST Traffic Impact Peer Review) k Qp �4, � J, "i �` i !' � MAS "$ �• �f' , Grove Street Intersection (Ref: FST Traffic Impact Peer Review) Me w ita - ,, -*a. l,• hJ )\y` iix� �1,r Fw•�y,,,•3i w e{ 1 I I 0---- Recoiii-m—endgdlTe RoIN adway Improvements Grove Strt at Goodhue Street and Beaver Street ,ioRrm .y�. � • ds,J'�' - �.�:f'.;x Y", w. � l r r ^Y . Ste. Ixstau , 1" 'L �t ►`:4'; "'• :" `tea .,.RBIIR v `� ♦ ISLAND , 9 � I BfALL NIgSpL pAISED, gx6 t ` M '\� IN AL RAgFDISLANO `l r, PARt" A `.PRDPQ4FD PARIDNY�1REl 1^�r � a ' � �REMO'YE DD'MPP�• � �• F �► �.� .� , M I M___ Recommended Roadway Improvements Grove Street at Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street ✓ .L _ 1 Ya n { �i, � �� n t ��u�.o�'1 .v," *. . �' ` /,y4. _�'S1RYgf � ��Y�'i ' Z� ♦w � , x +�F Y 'e. t 'ly wy, • +q,_ ice,., Yy�p ' �y+? q'R y�"♦` Y y�i,•" • 'f T r�'4y' 4;'yt. <h.�.•��, °orut� T.�e �` •'J ', •,iK't' {�', is ``1�'` xrr .., a kE OV,` Ns, § N� a (+A titi ,.. ��... .� '�� �7 .•.._.. 4' D .s. a �� +s "rim • ..� ♦ r r !�°�' � fi5j, i ��� bpi. �.� ��'��r � ' }. �' Il. i�1' �- C ... '.. ♦ +M. .a ° ';�4 �?r, y��"''3a�s♦W"�r./.• ''�'�,°s,ra'{�-AJp.pYb'., w s ..J'.� ♦ �qii"IiI 1r11.R„�J �'*� ,Yr{�*FiEi Yo.Ei$+M�EQ'fcp.art.c,vYa~t +'Z�,.r I mvu, �w�•, ba-L+ aIf �.y adRfyw., ..f*,'K;wA'•'+`v,�.y�k' '.YR ."r. j� .t`J`` �` •,1-:�1�p. ii$.y e ;.�. z T W.W. oa,&u.Z VAN NIL .4 J1 Al ♦ M...2 -n IR.i .fii..' / LA Ogg: ♦M ' ' 1 J . S � "� 'C�JN iROY �V'QlE + � � �"�"� ♦ K�++'�'f A"'� J � �+ Color Rendering (Building MUM View) P is ON .,(y�g aa■ iii `^ I.. P J�:.c�,,,y,� �ll _. . .'n. ii dei: n�� liRil •■e ' II� ; I � 'iii �! .�iilii .. I 1 ��11{�...y+ rrr 11'fyF+ftL� _i. uE - ^ "gyp Ie� I'I A i� i A7 t r II b ,,al� ' '3n.+ _ �'` �E rff[ e k awuk®�� Ji . � '�' 44 gg ur , ��F Y■Y II>(�N� Y�C� 3 FIJ Ii�� iomil i�iKli �i{I� 1 n I ! If p. Pa IO a sr,t t a}\ ! lyl l� J k� ���i II�.�,'�' `�� I.i� �' _'�I si�-•s 4�� �� al �� r �._ J`{��` � ��4 r ��• � I : r' 71 1 . € �� S i.n.o .rleu tif� faR k �r �stary�y tfel y }5} 1' f t`h IA 1 f rl,i. n� die■deafI�av+ �I1i+il �: ■rrp �_ � ,w 4 n. fei0 I ear M} I; a}}�I Ri61p1� I 'p "�11. r I� • > �: .. �'^. !, J Ih � �'At ,�i.. C .� . .CSI tf� 1a.1 � Ij` eYr' t r .II..� +IaaRl�I] ��R7 RI1 ' �. j ..�' ^,�C t � Y 're "`---"�--p.■ .L.�S + " � _ �_ r 1'�- �.iFA � ...�`"" ;e _ ...-. i ,�.i 1�y :1 JmM ��tC t [ .b `+�uNnf rimn 4s Cu a, tii at}■l 1}■■ A �. ff} :.+n 'n +� t �.•^��� .w,: a.I,�YI� x tRR�i Y*flJ��l a. .� f^r." si I ♦ �reX r. -;�..,�tt t - �$ .J a a �i r 4.Ii ! p t , J ` J , •� t s r Yr t #,± +yrY �,•'Y7�i ♦ i ��I xi �'tJ � '�. m «.k'9 jY� f�Ja"T," '-' rW j v r+.i�i �'+' i x. .r !e' �# "!�S ; 4 �'J Asa r ,rrg�y5 ��a u ,+a F 3 n }{r. 4� t ,.r C tiJ •1 1 y #yY 1 P , �" E , ,i� P�f �"V' � � r�i � rt y ". IV Gi � hiy tF� bbbba4 tg SMA � �i�r�y 4�v� Y •4,y I��)a TtiA Y}' ��Yy.Fr!• 1. { iJ {�,7 ,�f n��,�� yr �,: r A. $ I'n 1 Y �I Ifh Y F 115J• Y ,r 1. i , v _�_ r4 .aL� .ati T .�4.Y='- � ro�L`f.Y .-t•..i. e 0 0C3LJ LJ LJ • • L^.�iJ_I �JJJ.SJJJJ IEEE IE IE IE ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 99 39 ME lu ® ® ® ® Im ® ® ® ■ FRONT ELEVATION i ® ® ® M® ® ® 0300 ® ' 0000 ® im ® ® ® ® ® ® a ® ® FRONT ELEVATION 0 0 03 [taw LTJ �".JIJaJ • • � L.1.J�J►JL7 ® ® ® ® m m m Sam 10 m FRONT ELEVATION 4441 IE 19 ® 00 ® 1919 ® 1919 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 0800 IE EE HIM IE EE1919 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® EU m a n m n . Eu EU m m m ® ® ® ® a ® ® REAR ELEVATION B9 EE EU EE UE EE OE EE EE ® Eg ® Eg ou OE ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® im Im ® ® lu EU M ® ® ® ELM ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® REAR ELEVATION i Build'in'g #�3 - Rear Eleuat�ion (Building Near Grove Street) I , IF .. '..' .. - p . ll r . n MA c .s"'n� ®•tea®�..4.��{"i`Ti+�$€�: � t 'St a. •'f.: rt�:rt FJ 'a' y-rL 111111011 elic- nA. ^^ 29 s' •'�1' .(E�" ,$w�,+ Ar. r£!.t?1 C� It"� St� 4 �Y(l�.Ja@i�'�=v� iy. . Liwy3y. rte. ^I'ry,r^e^^" •::n rr rP 1p!^��.r,,�^Si�' - ".f•r.� � � � ae _—�' t r---., y S S.e,"�" ®� ^f^`.n n ra fY P^ r�,+i^rsit.^rj +�•6"^PPe T`�T 4, `fit" ,Pi -t@S.a • 9 lit !Mg "P LEGACY PARK APARTMENTS SALEM J Presented by! s MRM Project Management, LLC & The Federated Companies 60-64 Grove Street/3 Harmony Grove May 2012 Salem,Massachusetts Scale t"=40' x�. Mlain Entrance } fir. ♦.._;1 `ir 2 L ,M141'l ll N"�/P� f�, t Y� t1 /a V Lf A _.�--"_... � � t ♦ � � 6 � lWf. � ,,�, � Y-'i'/lam 1 i/5 � �_ sad., � �1' �y�' S. � 1 'L' +'�• 7s1r `-f#"i_ 31`hw-.' 3::4.,5 : %t r-. ;�•#s' �'` 'vi.*s ,.. �4�1 ^�} ' Yy',�h.�,asr�"i��". 1 `^� .. r:�L�ry/uy:, r• .,. i Mrd 1. r r-iyr^ +rr 'fir Grove Street View vy }�, v^ _ ( ,� ... .■. ... gas ss/ Per ��P. ii: IN ,�.`�, `i.. � �s.,,� •Ppl�{I�Vn ca II... fir• .tee Bridtge Over North River Canal yt . 1 I,�'� �� 'sem" �-! ��+ w „� � ``Y .b ` • }s• W—�4 , '!yam prY � _. .1 1111 y1.�.•.�`[� 9 ' - M R .� '.� aa1 w-�41s� � r .... ,+' .�"mxa � , Via. ,�`" 3s<r �•�., " 1 . �• 1q �.�t.�-�...m� .�-..c3r,rs�.sy., '7 {.4 �t a � , IJ tt� .��R=1.. _. •��g1�111CIll;r`4's � �� se.k '` t s —{ _,{�.•.. �_ _ :_,.�. r 4 ' Mir 'w51 L b Y }}yy T �54 i I ek ROAD --� NNN RIVER CANAL - PDA \ \ ` INN ear �mANs.+oRiAnor AUMD '^MA55A HUSEm �a, — --_ `r-. 1� fl h jJ RIlr NJ zzll y<-`3��-+>• w l` ' - \ �y�` iii °um'E — — 1�e�'.-.1-`�I�yyi`� N ��� -®$• y'�urk d'{ _ ' a4. $ Ka IN �rt T I v - u BEAVER STREET O � y v n m V vo n ' m p - Grm C.fo »m trA° •rm ]rn� »w zn -•rm +� '' SECIICN A v° �n Cy v ..av ry pro wm uw ufC. m v.x a.m a.w •.m L F ,. SECTION 8 F rr>� _ no h, tray ••: 4 l «« �� w, o.v.+vc ,Y..e.. ..r..r �� ■ ■ ■ L ""may �"�.,, -�•. ` "'x,. µ a e n 3 vo e « wqI µ am. SECTION C ye. ct-w i w. ut.S" .... 80 70 `- C � 50AM rm i4s�ro PROP. BUx.01xc w r4 BEAVER BT. - aB To,Elosr: Bnaol50 - — — — 70't TO LIMIT OF F ST w 30 .:, .. .. VEUV;k * P . ROP. :.-O . ALGS�S �.(RAM) A2E) WALLtop _.'.:. 201 aWC` E7nSL ORAOE 10 ., ... _ " WALL, . . .. " PROP.BLOCK - - BUILDIN0.5 GRAtlE ' 0+00 '0+50- 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+ u �z� fpr r t1'"ah3 i �YS Yt pIb�. P a [Pgas 90. a m�nx r EM°k� `.v,.,".k.`'P. '"F. wwx xa.s x'e; `„ •,,�,,'4. •,,,,..,; �i,Y,,,�, ry ;, ,� 60 a 1 .. ., 4 TM y��j(.us' S 1• MpSLL wkyllkJfiifVAl.. 70 .. ... . . . .� ,.. _ _ .L. . .. ..L-. ... 60 ,- --144' T4 BU PROP. DDING .. , ~. 50 WAM 40 :NAITEdERNT BUILD f1.NISING ^ L .. „ _ .. 30BUILDING 40- . ... . .:y .., ^ - ,'vim.W 20'. �.. _ BUILDING ,Y EXIST. GR62E LBfNT 4..1Lo--- {RAZEy .. •.._. „e,•- ^".--,. .. s...' 10 ' 'PROP: Bl :..__ :. _ Y+Nd,.TIYNE N. _ EINISN . .. PROP. BUILDMOS CRAOE t ORA4E1: .. ... . -. . 50 2+00 2+50 3+00, 3+50 4+00 r r � n m + t 90 80 70 60 ------ To To Poor. @ULOWC W BEAVER 1124 BE#kVM St. , .,.... y ..I ... .. �. 50 smEEt Bis 9 .Y✓GBK� ps .—. tjQHT ` a o 40 ., Ay Q FENCE r ..... .. ., TROP. ,20 All -L 10 _ _ ... .: .- _. . ... .. PROP. BLOCK r.'. WALL BE 0TWEEN 0+00 0+50 . . 1+00.. . 1+50. 2+00. . . . 2 pc h tea` y., gtD(� ff3 ° - ou f. ro x . Y 90 T} �., a ,�'+� .v ry' ''�t#,. *N d K."�:t �#a��"r.`+S 'ro`r.r` E�.". -aa. 5,x«xS '.a•., ..�^,�.'..,'�,�. w f W c '.4�^".�n+ s*{,e4C^• � .'�"*4§YS.A.�r.wrq^{N..II+.«� r,+ ,.,,r�.c s.e.Y.x i,.-. z v.. � ,...a ;� ,r; 80 70 ...1'-. .. ..... �.:.. .. . .. ' ., . . ..:. ._ .. . .. 60 be'-M PROP Nbobwo 50 CE 46 . 30 NO..Q9. « . _,..... RoAn .. .PROP:KOCN .• - - -r �' 70' WA0. RE1N'EE _ PROP. BllILdNGS PAYM '0 50 2+00- - 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 s. Sao �y 110 r 100 �90 so ..... ... .....:, RIDGE EL 74:BEAVER ... ww 70 ... ... ...- . .. .-. u., Z 600. OW eEAWR 57. _ law TO PROF:r({U0.1lI .. G •� > 50 - W -LdFROF, .E.. ti ♦�:E z" �, TO OMIT. ` -:eNT 40 CHAIN lMl(30 7 .20. - - o 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+'50 2+00 2 V k � kw r 00 c x « a NOW a. ♦ w��.aa^w++.k� ^C`k s,-,�.e. 'W�j"ie;..r.ar �a ,.+.h'vX.i+� � ir.�.r+w3 '�;aL�} �r fr � 'G.Nd N`C ry .. ..-. ». ». ... :,... , .. ., .. u�e -_..a•4.. ..a...i fn ., ,u .x,.,.t. .. .«., w...xn:a.<gS... K a�` �� +F I;W 70 PFOB.=9UWIMG.,,.' QPROA "."f...... MQHT .;. GRAOP, PIH y4;� 50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+ r ;` P Y ^ F� q.# 120 V,.. ._. . v h YY �E � � e •d 110 �v rkFr;X`....+ „,y.,. +.,,ei• sir. TM.„,, 700 `; 66 80 k7 §``Alt- 76 y: Y L ry r ...r..... .. .. ..fY' .1s' �... _ _ .. .. ... SOu = Y n W � 40�. r �^' . � �.r wcei.3Ak1 al ,. ....... �,'... .«.. ...•. .._. �,'..++ew..,.....a ... ,.. ...... .. .._ a �" � � .^f..,r..� ..��.., . ... . 4feixi L& •`Fm �,rrwi PROPOSED 5Gp .,... .. 20'. 61 SMWAn PROP. OA, :..10.. PROP. ,: .. rRAVEL PAIN r `. .. 7 .. -10 00 3150 4+00_ 4+50 5+00 5+50 RE FIA JpY2 •S IA •f'a; � seam d"4 (w !� 1 t Y11F': y�yg�y �A r F'1 "rr' ry Fr r' IFnn �I r1r rvIs/'p FPp�p,� _ 'I` f P1 _ r Y. ; �I Fw fFf ✓ A(TF I.I.tir.�'�'.".^/ M�� .2IrI�,.pin• N.L w - h. ;y r LEGACY PARK APARTMENTS SALEM PresenteA by: 5 MRM Project Management, LLC & The Federated Companies 60-64 Grove Street/3 Harmony Grove May 2012 Salem,Massachusetts Scale t"=40' Riverview Place 32.5 72 Flint St. Jefferson at Salem 24 190 Bridge St. Hawthorne Commons#1 24 205 Highland Ave. North River Condominiums 22 28 Goodhue St. Legacy Apartments 21 3 Harmony Grove Rd. Hawthorne Commons k2 0 4 First St. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Units per Acre GRAPHIC SCALE _ HISTORIC HIGH I \\ _ _ ///((('''WATER LINE I1. X.LMCFE)E ELSi. AEO[ONfAIIE GIflB - _ "- / 1 $B/DH m CPpsEWALK MAD PTI®PIL sILEANEK ATiE Cl � � - - - � / \ /`// 1 (HLD LINE) CURB aT - / _ - 7� \ \ I N p REEFN. N. ) 25 WOE 1 T4 SE.S.D. SEWER I (, \ EASEMENT 1 HISTORIC HIGH / "�'/W'OE)' wio 59A i / / MAP I6 LOT}A /11�� \ 1 MAP 16 LOT 238 '50 / N/E HLD ` I WATER LINE ON Py \µp BARVE CORP,�/ / I HARMONY GRO . 50 LAND STREET REAL EST,LLL ^ LAND COURT PLAN GEHI.A \ l NORTH RIVER CANAL — TIDAL �c 'p A��5 / / / w0001k"STAT v \ 1 �<C��� —D25SEWER-� �aPa/0amOInGK(w/g'PPE �� 1 �'9z- E EASEMENj / I \ \ \ 1 s METTLEm31 HISTORIC HIGH E%I$iING \\\Z\\\ ml HISTORIC WATER llNE WATER LINE ORIDGE \ ��If FSj _ fI EXIST W F F y y - W W jllr LAYMEN $ \ \ -I m EMAP 16 LOT 376 \ -.- -._ FROICKED CROSSING _ _ _AILRUAD � 12� - I _ - A© _ "N \ -512 -.__ _ _f. --._._ D C° 1 -10 HARMONY GRAVE CORi EASEMrNT siUP SC ~ - - 1 - - -� -- T E 5 CF11 CADA°0 anupKAT SikTE 00 — AAD STD BAY \ TRANSPORTATION RR. TRACKS AflE ' — _ I AUTHORITY Da o PR. TRN l.S:;.lw1HH Hy+vrH!"'rt'1'HN 1.rr Hel HV.lHiifl.rH)aJ rtf-1l,ti+lY:N,..+m..+mm1..1,4MHriItiHHIH4H+'4H"M-MHtlti\'Y.n! NHfH HHH41'+'W1H HµHH �H+rHH HHti1HHLHH-H1+NrtH4H!'fWHVlIH1fi1+HfYH,vHfi}HV!NH4H14u4 'r}4+'v+IHI PROP BIKE H I, -1 - - - - - NH « AK BIKE W.f ,li:l+:++H .,1+111 H HHh±IrMHr!iH-Y+i Hh}HM-1..F+r1l-1M+Hµ`14!}}}I-=HH�1+ ti.fH-V! Nu''+IH'lr+=HHlII= 4N'11' .. T+41.!lHHlti!1 r.Im.1,�.-rViHHH1+HH+rFHH.HV-W+4`Hf±Hltl �1Y-FI 4r.H�iHH Hf-H11�Y`IKE PROPOSED CNUSETTS �Mu. w+H,.rs,""1H++14'w�"w4+H:+;I.rHHH.rw Hrr L_ ° •"E• PARKING) Bx° 1 MASSA OrrrHHH+ s� AR eIT coNc. PATH ItAg17E_ M 12 (TENANT sO + PS1EB GRnNiTE _ _ _ 1. �LJR 1 1 - kH" _ � TWAL (TO REMAIN '� siCpALF nREA ~ e \ 1 " R_ 9 ..APIA L In EecLO�su� Im xmc I �, -Cs R`- WAW PEn¢>q�� Eu,rI,- REPLACE E TOW_ BRIDGE OFFICE 4 -ti—EL�� SGERA NORTy RlI/E DUILDwc wosisr ROANAL—lio Art er_ocica �wGAE"G �) ET. W UNIm _�•� GRAN =_E g:6` a 10/1/13 p oa m6 R.-geld IAM Pea 8 H 5 _ 1 9 k CE C R sEU CO wq rt Y W Gq D GDI TNG Z 40.0 — µ.A_L Q/ Im 4 ryp Rn 3 ) IT N R BIT CONCPOATE O RES.AREA CALL, PEP JI➢i $ 1 ATIi _ EL 9,6{ 3 9/i9/13 AJ TABLE OF AREAS. IF • RE RAO Pqs _ 122 J _ CI _ WALK I PE JUI ) AT LIN M 3 C) 2 )/15/13 Xa1cF Rea, 1 Rea -A D E fiaunaar Don 3 13 anE IL I STONE RET Y x 1 xrn W/GAD CE L ® �' _'-.TI , P e, 111. C INATI.LINES C MAP Ifi LOT 21J WAIL "6 ` i N ~ W I S (4 _U ; \ 1 8/3O/3 ITTDD A,ST EN E/50 N N V 0..._ o .... UPGRADE ESTRIAN . Sp KR ES I6 LOT 218 ____8PD DISTRICT U _ WALKL. N 2 _I — — ` TE INE 40ET GROW k T.ENTRANCE LE ( $ $T C GPOK ET LA OU. L C A TRANCE. LLE BRIDGE. i MO ADDe E PDG .� _- __ _ -_ _ __ D ST _ eAne;. P, SILVER rvTF - - R Ts Ic - �� rvp Dere �6Gna1roR o R2 DISTRICT I 16. �y$ (, rP06uC WAY FLORE$ _ I M�7,fl _ •1 - ~ .~ Revisions - - - - - - - �(A - - T— - _ 4J - II MAR T.LOT�' N' T. PMAP I6� I 3O 3J /F ON 22TJ' y28 srvsrrE] IRESIDENTIAL SPACE MAP16LT ]6 / MAP 16 LOT L{:NLEY10 AID CONCRETE r 1 CPOSswµ5 ADA RAMPS ENO 9fN 1r Oafi.ass SF) .om,y FLORES Nz \\Q 3 H/3 1 uwso _ _ _ T _ wAu — N ADPST� MAP 16 I A&N REAL 1 �LOi 222 ESTA)E I��.. I— — MPP N LOT 2] I I AI.I- 1 p NOTES: LOiP230 Q NOHLOFEfl TRUST 1 I I I I pEMEVLE n� MAP IN OT 2321 — ,Nl. 1 REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES N/F ¢ M �H381 I N .... ..CONC. N30 NFT qoa MAP I6 MYERE 1 ®iJ CE " PRavos AND LEGEND. �BLANDEN I m NAn I I 3 ILOV 23 .. N'D .,. LOLP235 rtACT/ O C N48 I 2 .I �I ROSS 5 k.0 _ 1 L_ R T 3a MAP Ifi iT5 / Co no I-.. 3e.._ AD Lo zzRLO-- �= (Bt SPv�2ln Loi' N6....LON L 00 PA pN- 3 I _ � /_ NI SPERIOANOS CSINGGIN PA ON 'O w BASH _ — M - n GRANITE CURB REA VER STREET I aRAAF ZONING CHART x REQUIRED (PUBLIC WAY- 30'WIDE) IND PER PUD PROVIDED m MIN. LOT AREA 60,000 SF 362,000 SF FOOTNOTES Griffin N MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100" 161.3]' 1) REF. SECTION ].3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT', R2 LISTED. - TES EDup, LLC MIN, LOT WIDTH -- 164.1' 2) LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD GRAPHIC SCALE _ - Group, LLC MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14,5% SETBACK FOR EI ZONING DISTRICT. 1. W MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 49.1 1 d 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. - - _----.I t 1P.000 BOX 7061 MIN. FROM YARD DEPTH -- 59.1' SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. - - N MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- a].6' � � __---- - I 1 100 Cummings Center,Suite 224G DI 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION XI THE SITE _ _ Beventy,MA 01915 > MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0' (1.5 SP/UNIT). 22 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE T inch- ao n. _� _ - _ -- - - _4 � MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15' BUILDING. �- - -46' WTD[ --APPROX. _ �� 1 1T Tel.978-927-5111 MAX. BWLDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 5) LOT AREA INCLUDES #1 & #'5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. � - _ SEWER _ R��ISTWCS � - �_ - - I -lo O MIN. PARKING -� PROPERTY LINES - - - Fax 97&927-5103 ROAD — _ �. — — 1 ARMONY GROVE— — MRM PROJECT GOT ® _ — .!_ _ — _ _ — — �— _ TIDAL 1 MANAGEMENT, LLC �— — — _ _ — — __.�__ NORTH RIVER DANA —! ,µµ1H;1+D�StRlct' _. SALEM, MA N - - MAP 16 L07 378 N/F s - _ _ HARMONY GROVE _ SALES _ coRP. A�Y 1O1STfi19T____-___'� la PEABDOY - _ _ �- - _ (1.02 ACRES)—�TATION ��R2 DISTRICT OVERALL DD — -�_— — — — N T�USETTS BAY _ - _ I 1z SITE LAYOUT _ 1 MASSAGH MAP IN LOT 216 m _ /T PLAN E —TYIby1— — APPROX. I ___ — - - TABLE OF RESIDENTIAL SPACE RAYMOND Im y O f �a -- (' ENTRANCENON-RES, 1 m N GO CANAL _ PROPERTY LANES RESIDENTIAL NON-RES. TIDAL y _ CORRIDOR LOT ARFA USE AREA USE AREA Io In DANAL ENTRANCE. oo OVERLAY TRICT 60 GROVE STREET 26,946 SF D SF 26,946 SF 1� Scale:f=40' d \ RTH RIVER CORRIDOR NIU, DISTRICT 64 GROVE STREET 234,152 SF 142,056 SF 92,096 SF NO OVERLAY p I Jpb NO.:)DO DISTRICT .h 1 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 20,909 SF 0 SF 20,909 SF I /�_Z O 1. J _ 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 35,561 BE 40 E 30,]62 SE I �q_y�g p/p/e/T-b M _ I 5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 44.,00 SF 0 5F 44.432 SF 1 Palz 12/20/11 M TOTAL 362,000 SF 146,855 SF 215,145 Sr 1 4 CGNSTRUCnON SFWFNCE. 1)INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEMUS ALONG TOP OF BANK AND UNIT OF WORK. MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND ADJUST DAILY AS 22 ... .... REWIRED. 2)DECOMMISSION MSTING SEAM PUMP STATION. REMOVE SEWER UDUHES 2C ...................- FROM EXISrNG BRIDGE. 3) REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE AND ABUTMENTS AND DISPOSE DECORATIVE: -SRE, _LIGHT POSTS OFF 4) STABILIZE EMBANKMENT WN RIP RAP. 5) INSTALL TEMPORARY SHEET RUNG COFFERDAMS AT PROPOSED ABUTMENTS 6) STABILIZE EXPOSED AND BASE OF WALL SCOUR BANK WN RIP RAP 16 .................. PROTECTION. 42"HIGH GUARD S.E.S.D. SEWER KAS�fall 7)EXCAVATE TO PROPOSED FOOTING GRADE. ESTABUSH DEWATERING SYSTEM. 8)INSTALL POSTING MUNG SUPPORTS. 14 9)FORM&POUR PRE CAP. 10) FORM&POUR ABUTMENT WALLS 12 q FINISH 11)REMOVE SHEET RUNG AND FINISH INSTALLING RIP RAP. 12) INSTALL PROPOSED STEEL I-BEAM BRIDGE GIRDERS. 13)FORM AND POUR CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK. .1 14) CONSTRUCT BRIDGE CURBING. GDEWALK &WARDS, 10 15) INSTALL=TRICAL CONDUITS AND BRIDGE LIGHTING. 76) FINE MADE APPROACH RAMPS AND INSTALL BINDER COURSE. 17) INSTALL APPROACH CURBING AND SIDEWALK. E%ISTING8 _Wl �ING BOTT OF7 /rigRNG V3 F COMPOSITE 4' N Wal 8 LOAN AND SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS. 'OTTOM ZW STEEL BEAM MADE �9�INSTALL FINISH PAVEMENT COURSE. 6 GRPDE MEL 1-2 BEAM \UNC. BEEN I W� _EI.EV_8.65J,, .......... rUl 7.65± DEEP S ARMOR PR.l ARMOR PROPOSED) 20)REAN)ME EROSION CONTROLS AFTER AM DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABLE. REMOl/F �_SfDESI_OPES ALONG SIDESLOPES ALONG PROP.FINISH EXISTING PROF.FINISH SOIL AS 4 RKCR BOTTOM. RIVER BED RIMER FOLLOW NNGWAI I BASE NECESSARY OF ABUTMENJ WTH 10%SLOPE (APPROzJ tOS SLOPE RIP RAP(D50-9-) NOTE 2 1)Sl FLOOD ELEVATIONS FROM METCALF&EDDY. JULY 18, 2008 LETTER ssm 3&0' CLI CONCRETE. ENTT_ED 'SUPPLEMENTAL SUl TO ENIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM(EMF) ABUMMINT FOR FLUOR MITIGATION FACILITIES FOR THE PEABODY AREA'. REPORT INDICATES CONCRETE (TYRj NAT ME 20M "MOMERS DAY STORM* WAS A 50-YEAR STORM EVENT. I` FWRNG OR' 2)BRIDGE DESIGN IS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL STRUCTURAI_ 2 MILE CAP MBD) GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDRAWC EVALUATION. 3)BRIDGE DESIGN TO IMPROVE HYDRAULIC CONSTRICTION CREATED BY EXISTING BRIDGE CROSSING ME NORTH RIVER. BRIDGE CROSS—SECTION 41 A_dl C.(1)----fir lla A �A Pal W AP Al 2 �.A�2 NOSSMAN a. No Wle l aTM I 6/'10/1]C.... Am PLAN Desmpbonn AlNIN, MIT RAW, lam Revisions vow —————--——— ——————— --——————— --la- 1KODWAl m. BRIDGE SECTIONoaEm 4 Wal BRIDGE ELEVATION 4 a, PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE Griffin Engineering up, LLC P.O B.7061 IM Cummings Center,SNW,224G PCI,PMAK ma. Ell W 01915 ..M- GUA/G,S_HJ` Z-=. L0 1 -7 Td: 5 aETELAI ------ 7.01 2.8' 5.01 Fax97&927-6111 .978l 8.5 tlAVWEIE 2.2'* PROJECT m. MANAGEMENT, LLC Nall E_A." A., A..Q. Nall Call 5' -A Oml 1. 2a E_sfi SALEM, MA LAI (AAX.2X�) .GNCIE UI LANpXG RAMP "AND K.I.G 2.,1 G_G. AGA GmP 5.0 Ox Am. DETAILS IV f N_.GaETE PIN IN.7.=)N 0 2tO' 5 0' EL 975 2. Z4, PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE Z= PA W/ 0' PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE " NORTHERLY APPROACH SOUTHERLY APPROACH al Y C-9 GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 20 40 80 760 NEW GRANITE CURB INLAID CONCRETE EXIST. AND CONCRETE - ' - SB/DH - CROSSWALK AND CURB CU SIDEWALK AT EXIST. i - _ . _ - \ ADA RAMPS AT CURB CUT �- // _ . (HLD LINE) ( IN FEET ) MAIN ENTRACE 1 inch = 40 ft. 25' WIDE S.E.S.D. SEWER / MAP 16 LOT 377 / \ EASEMENT p GR �IpE� STOP SIGN (1 HARMONY GROVE RD.) SB/DH \ 0 t AND STOP / ± FT FN D & HLD \ \ MAP 16 LOT 238 HISTORIC HIGH � 1 � . 20,909 SQ. 14 WATER LINE O `( 5 t Sipe <, BA .�/ / 0.48 ACRES N/F \ RM C �1P iB• / \ 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC P� CPv81.� / _ ' _ T �� \� LAND COURT PLAN 33813A �A 2 Gam`% 0 — - — NORTH RIVER CAN L — TIDAL - 25' WIDE i PROVIDE GRANITE _ - - HISTORIC HIGH XV i / CURBI —' WUUD ENTRANC5—& ND & METAL � � S.E.S.D. SEWER / i / T0,&At[_ROAD TRS BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE REMEDIATION AREA \ \ \ WATER LINE EASEMENT, / DECK= EL. 9.2± (SEE SHEET C-10) \ ti s \SSR\-1� � D o 1 � \ PROPOSED \ \ 0 / VEHICLE SEE PLANS BY MAP 16 LOT 237 ' — � � c• 5�0 � / ( MAP 16 LOT 239 EXISTING � (60 GROVE STREET HISTORIC HIGH MCBRIE, LLC) `._ (3 HARMONY GROVE RD.) 26,946 SQ.FT. ) WATER LINE A�s REMEDIATION AREA EXIST. 35,561 SQ.FT BRIDGE. 0.62\ 0.62 ACRES J MAP 16 LOT 378 ` (SEE SHEET C-10) RAILROAD 0.82 ACRES _ _ - PROPOSED _ _ _ \ - _ _ _ _ - - INLAID CONCRETE — - • - • — • - - - - - - - - - - �- - �- - _ - . _ - • - . - . - . - . - . . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - , - - , _ CROSSWALKS & T (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) CROSSING - _ •______ _ _ -L , - , - , _ . - . - - . - . - - - EASEMENT STOP SIGN HISTORIC HIGH �— EXISTING LhADING _ gyp 44,432± SQ. FT _ ADA RAMP AT l0 1.02 ACRES _ _ —�— AND STOP BAY WATER LINE \ TRANSPORTA TION AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN ENTRANCE R.R. TRACKS Salo _ .. BAR ' I I I I 111 I III 1 I I''L) t_�1I _ - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ll 111 Ll I t,'X111 I'I �L_� LI� �_�j_� �_L����1 J I 1111'I' TT1TI!1 I I I I N I 1/C I I �77 1 T I H TTT 7 T 17 ITT l++l i I +I i+TTTTf I I I iTIT77iT�TT 7 i T 17T! +1+� .�f++i PROPOSED R.R. 'RAC �'I-H, ++++H+H H-4+i+H _ _ - _ - _ nTr„�I, - - PROP. BIKE _ - c FENCE _ - ---- �,� ~ RACK , h CH U SETT.? - BIT. CONC. PATH 59.1 \ MASSA _ _ ' - - - _ 24.0' ��� AL ;(TO REMAIN PROP` RECONSTRUCT - a \ \ _ EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL 11 ----_� I RAILROAD CROSSING _ _ N~ _ - _ _ N _ _ STORAGE SPAGRANITE DE) `�10 CURBING\ _--- i (SEE PLANS BY VANASSE - _ & ASSOCIATES) --► _ CK RET PROPOSED - _ AREA EXISTINi, � BULK TRASH HANDICAP \ WALL TOW _ PEDESTRIAN OFFI CE 4 REPLACE _ MONITORING STORAGE AREA , BRIDGE WELLS I RAMPS ® �` _ - EL 9.g f N BUILDft' SIDEWALKS WITHIN FENCED (TYP OF 4) ENCLOSURE co 16 O/Q j ALONG 111111111111 (TYP) \ CQ 7 GROVE GE �q `/` CA�/� � GR,gN1 T FRONTAGE W/ nP•�� PROPOSED BUILDING #1 ® L j� E BLO CONCRETE _lo � . D C K - L RE cn T. W GARAGE UNDER cn W RELOCATED �I = �•- FENCE ENCLOSED / __ �� ALL TOW MATERIAL CELL _ 47-UNITS (GRASS) i I n ~ d _ TRASH & RECYCLING ( ) PROPOS EL 9.6f -11 N 5 BIN STORAGE AREA PROPOSED ED B(�I 40.0 N ..� _ (TYP EACH BUILDING) BIKE RACK CONCRETE �► W/ GARA LDING #2 -^ 8 I TYP OF 2 SIDEWALK GE UNDER BIT - ` I 14 PER BUILDING) O ® (47-UNI TS) "D ____� SNC?ATH W L. 9.6-+ - - `----------- I ! -- ` \ _ - s BIKE RACK BIKE RACK PAINTED \ `. .' (TYP OF 2 HISTORIC HIGH (TYP OF 2 122.7 PER BUILDING) ,. WATER LINE CROSSWALK �;. '• PER BUILDING) ER "•�'��''' '" G REPLACE _ SIDEWALKS h I (TYP U.N.O.) �> t. g, 4 c o PROPOSED BU ' - GROVE ST. STONE R I V V NP. ? CONCRETE W/ GgRq� BUILDING #3 ®® - - • -� �� FRONTAGE W/' r I I ET LL I MAP 16 LOT 236 �, \ �•- SIDEWALK (47_ E UNDER CONCRETE MAP 16 LOT 217 _ ~ " : ' ,.:.. UNITS HISTORIC HIGH -f(64 GROVE STREET) - _ �� (TYP) ) N/F 234,152 SQ.FT. -► WATER LINE . ..... SARKES � #12 I 5.38 ACRES - ` N PROVIDE GRANITE 1 � — Ck CURBING AT _ — #6 _. — V L o c ENTRANCE (TYP)L - - - I 10 - - - - - - V - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IST - - - - - - - MAP 16 LOT 218 E1PD DISTRICT - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �_ R2DDIDSTRICT '- No. Date faes�riotinn . a.•,.. Slid SIL V Elm NTF R2 DISTRICT _ 16.2 (PUBLIC WAY FLORES '►� _ - - - ---� - - - -17 -00 Revisions - 2 (f) 47.6 II MAP 16 LOT M 1 _ _ p #4 224 LOT 225 MAP 16 II J jr N/F #34 N/F OT 227 #28 l� sHED SHED® 30.0 II /1 INLAID CONCRETE I ZE MAP 16 LOT 76 � Q � MAP 16 LOT � CONLEY � TUC ER N/F ' N/F # 9 ' 223 � I LAWSON i _ _ CROSSWALKS & ADA RAMPS STOP SIGN II L `, FL RES 2 N F I #32 - - - - AT MAIN ENTRANCES AND STOP II _ _ ��; �' MAP 16 A&N REAL I I WALL -! BAR I, MOST RECENT + LOT 222 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 23 ;1 ALL �I MAP 16 N/F TRUST N/F LOT 220 U t KOHLOFER DEMEULE MAP 16 LOT 232 #? II PREVIOUSLY- N/F O , MAP 16 I BLANDEN i I Q Q I ILOT 231 ( MYERS BIT. CONC. PARKING 1 MAP 16 PROP. N/F I ( #10 LOT 235 FENCE/ II REVIEWED PLAN X48 I Q I 24 ROSS #20 ---� I MAP 16 MAP 16 N/F / I I # r PAR ZING MAP 16 LOT LOT 231 PATTISON O #40 #38 #36 BIT. #30 MAIP 16 LOT 229 8± SP CES 233 #6 N/F ` LOT CONC. N/F #14 ( ) CSWIGG.N PATTISON — — _ BASH _ (MARCH 2014) ISPERIDAKOS _ GRANITE cuR6 BEAVER STREET PosT. ZONING CHART REQUIRED PROVIDED (PUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE) FND PER PUD � MIN. LOT AREA5 60,000 SF 362,000 SF FOOTNOTES: MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100' 161 .37' 1) REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. , MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 2 LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD GRAPHIC SCALE _ _ �_ — � , Engineering MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5% ) — Group, LLC SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. 40 01 20 40 so 160 _ MAP 16 LOT 242 MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 40.6% 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. N/F MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1 ' SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. HARMONY GROVE _ _ _ - - -_- P.O Box 7061 CORPORATION _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ — I 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE ( � SET > _� — Beverly, MA 01915 MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0' (1 .5 SP/UNIT). 11 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE 1 inch = 40 ft. _ — ._ _ — - — Y� MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15' BUILDING. �- - - IDE R1 pISTRICI _ ��_ _ T MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 5) LOT AREA INCLUDES #1 & #5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. _ p _ — Tel: 978-927-5111 - - _ _ - - RISS- � - — 4 SE — — MIN. PARKING -- 215 — — — _lo Fax: 978-927-5103 _ - SAD - — — - -- _ — o _ = GROVE _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _- _ — _ _ �_ _____— �,lo -� ARMONY _ _ - - - _ _ — — _ — —_ __------- �I� MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC _ _ _ - - - - _ _ - - - _ _ -� � - - - ---" _ - � - - S I SALEM, MA SRACK - - - - - - - - _ - �� - - AP 16 LOT 378 CL _ - - - - — — - -. �� _-_(5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) - - �- I pISTRIC;T _ _ _� — 44,432± SQ. FT 0 GRAM �p,iwAuc - - -� —_- _ 1.02 ACRES _ _ AUTHORITY CT_ U1j _ �� _— gll. °o�°— — __-- pAL _ _ SPORTATI ON _ _ _ _ _ _ — OVERALL — _ AL - - TR _ —_— — — — I SITE LAYOUT — _ ----- TI A N _ IN f - -- - --- ER 'AN - BAY _ - - _ MAP 16 LOT 216 p V _ _ RI TS _ - - _ _ � I N/F I NORTH, _� ACHUSET - - RAYMOND PLAN I 3 _ _ MASS - 6 MAP 86 LOT 135A �. z N/F ��- .— —` - - MAP 26 LOT 40 • CM SOUTHERN ESSEX _ - N/F o SG-4.L% 1 =40 N SEWERAGE DISTRICT _ -�� TRACKS MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY �I _ R.R. TRA - - I� Job No,: 700 31 OWN _ - � n _ BOUND _ - FI G- 1 IN4�? PIP�S�h-b 3/10/14 U N •2 - a n_ BIKE PATH ACCESS/CONCRETE PAVER NOTE: � GRAPHIC SCALE OWNER TO INSTALL REMOVABLE BOLLARDS \ \ 40 0 20 40 80 160 WITHIN 5' WIDE CONCRETE PAVER WARNING7 - \�\ �`\�1 STRIP IF UNAUTHOIZED VEHICULAR ACCESS ZOO� - . _ - �� BECOMES PROBLEMATIC. cuRB°gcuT — — - �. \ ( Irr FEET ) i - BOLLARVABLE / / / - • - - \ SB/DH �, \ 1 inch = 40 ft. Re PD � � • � — .—' _ � \ 25' WIDE (HLD LINE) ��\ \ � \ \ `�I `ioi j / _ • - / S.E.S.D. SEWER \ \\ G Q 0 V / , MAP 16 LOT 377 \ EASEMENT �� \\ G ` �IpE� � ' / (1 HARMONY GROVE RD.) SB/DH \ / MAP 16 LOT 238 HISTORIC HIGH - \\,� � � 11,50 / / 20,909± SQ. FT FND & HLD \ / \ �Cj� PROPOSED •� r-j / N F \ ROADWAY WATER LINE R\\�IO WP /�� / 0.48 ACRES \ \ \ 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC �� \ BY CITYIMPROVEMENTS LAND COURT PLAN 33813A \\\ \ ;oG \ / NORTH RIVER CALLL — TIDAL \ \ HISTORIC HIGH \ � 0 \ \ 25' WIDE �� / S.E.S.D. SEWER / / / - — OOD & METAL — - - \ WATER LINE BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE REMEDIATION AREA \ - IEASEMENT, / / DECK= EL. 9.2± (SEE SHEET C-10) \ p\S�RIC'( � / / REPAIR EXIST. ---� � / / BRIDGE FOR PED./BIKE ?\A,p'p R� / USE IF PERMITTED g BY MAssDEP \ MAP 16 LOT 237 HISTORIC HIGH co I MAP 16 LOT 239 \ (60 GROVE STREET) WATER LINE y �� — I c• / =1 EXISTING L I (3 HARMONY GROVE RD.) HISTORIC HIGH BRIDGE 26,946 SQ.FT. -9,p� �` \ REMEDIATION AREA EXIST. no 35,561 SQ.FT. WATER LINE ABUTMENTS \ 0.62 ACRES FSJ \ 4 i (SEE SHEET C-10) Z 0.82 ACRES \ \ MAP 16 LOT 378 RAILROAD I_ _ _ _ . - . - , \ - - - - _ - - - — -� (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) - . CROSSING - __ - ,- - - - - —� - - - --. - . - . - • ==- • - - - - _• - - . - . - . - - - - . - . - . - . - - . - . - . - • - - \ PROPOSED 44 432± R E EASEMENT �- PROPOSED 6' -� EXISTING LOADING INLAID CONCRETE "D 1 REMOVABLE FENCE ALONG AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN \ \ CROSSWALKS AT — o \ TRANSPORTATION „ ,, , -+ R.R. TRACKS ENTRANCE 2 BOLLARD BA Y TRACKS \ 1111 -I I-f-I-j4+�1+H4+f-1-1-+++ 4+1.4-1 fi l+-H4+ +H-I-F,-'-I+I 1.02 ACRES ''I �Ig . 1 1 1 1l f�1 1 1 1 11-1111+-+-+-+-I FENCE ALONG R R. TRACKS + {�} -H Hf H+H+F++++F+i 1 F+++1++- ++1+++1 - - 1 _ + - PROPOSED 6' �}- � PROP. BIKE c T K n ETT "NO VEHCILES” FENCE ALONG "' RACK 59.1' \ U >t., y.� �+{ :,,:.: TRACKS -I H / ��I SIGNS C t•• CONIC. 1 {,� A: 5' WIDE 0 C. :t: IY'�. �.. A:t. S S -;� A - - M _ N PAVER WARNING TO REMA N „ _ = o _ _ _ - _ STRIP (SEE NOTE) _ ;Q �- �, � � EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL \ l I�-26' cp _ N �� >,:,: PROPOSED •6 STORAGE SPACE 'Po __ -� N STRIPED ISLAND ..� AN �) J, \ \ (TYP OF 2) _ a 3.5 FENCE AREA ® _ --- BULK TRASH I - FENCE ENCLOSED \� K RET, Wq EXISTING �-'- - MONITORING STORAGE AREA I TRASH & RECYCLING ,� LL 14 TOW = OFFICE 4 HAND BIN STORAGE AREA \ • _ - , BI EL. 1 i WELLS WITHIN FENCED i I & CONC 9.6 f IV BUILDING \ (TYP OF 4) ENCLOSURE RAMS ® (TYP EACH BUILDING) \ . �� E�R�CY pq TH OR/'yr Rl 7 \\ 701 IIIIIillllll (�) Lq _ ER q R �\ 9' °' I 1 \ _ -� C AIAL- G AN/TE �I o PROPOSED BUILDING # \ ® T/D,qL BLOCK R RELOCATED �I TYP - _ PAINTED W/ GARAGE UNDER _ _ T WqLL TOW _ MATERIAL CELL I t•• _ ~ CROSSWALK (43-UNITS) . P \ , 40.0 PROPOSED - EL. 9 - - - (GRASS) i n n - ROPOS 6f N _ (TYP U.N.O.) PROPOSED ED BUI N 3.5' FENCE - _ BIKE RACK CONCRETE ~ W/ GgRgGE ING #2 -� • '� i4� �_ K bVq "NO VEHICLES" - - (TYP OF 2 TYP (43- NDER BIT CQ T �/ SIGN 1-x--28 I ) (TYP) _ _- ________� PER BUILDINGTUKL -------- I r PROPOSED S) ;: ,, PRO SOP E -�� & EM�GEN-Y LqN H � 9 6� -CROSSWALK \ • o HI - IKE RACK SHEET '' '�••' • ,•..,.. (TYP OFC2 STORK HIGH (TYP OF 2 7 OTE, � 12 (SEE N ''`• " " -:., PER BUILDING) WATER LINE PER BUILDING) _- STOP SIGN & ? STOP BAR (TYP) :..,;.. PROP IIIIIIIIIIIIIi�I PROPOSED �-- 5' WIDE STONER I v v nP. CONCRETE W/ GgRgGE BUILDING #3 ®® - - -f ] CONC. FAVL WARNING STRI ,,'::.:: . :., SIDEWALK UNDER r I ET. WgLL I MAP 16 LOT 236 f (43_ SEE NOTE) MAP 16 LOT 217 _ (64 GROVE STREET) - - (TYP) UNI TS) HISTORIC HIGH \ \ :. .. I SARKES 234,152 SQ.FT. - --► V V _ _ ' � \ WATER ROVIDE GRANITE ...... LINE I� 5.38 ACRES J #12 I "VEHICLES 1 N Ck C ` >e.::•. N CURBING AT - - - - #6 EXITING" SIGN ' V ( c e ENTRANCE (TYP) 10 DIST AP 16 LOT 218 BPD DISTRICT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -f-- - - BPD SILVER - - -' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __- - - - - - - - = - - Description R2 DISTRICT o NTF 1R2 DISTRICT - . _ ._. • , .. ...� 16.2' 1- = ..o (PUBLIC WAY FLORES I I No. Date - - - - - - -I- -111111177711711�7 - - - _ R ; Revisions MAP 16 LOT M 1 �-► ��7.6 PROPOSED INLAID CONCRETE \ \� ' p #4 ;� 224 LOT 225 MAP 16 �� r7777-7771SHED 30.0' CROSSWALKS AT \\� I � ; I N/F #34 N/F OT 227 #28 SHED® ENTRANCE MAP 16 LOT 76 / Q f MAP 16 LOT I CONLEY I TUC ER• SIGN N/F PROP. AND STOPSTOP i s' I 223 I I I LAWSON I - - - - - - FENCE BAR ��-� RES #2 Q� ! N/F I I I #32 i WALL tt� MAP 16 A&N REAL I ' I CURRENT L LOT 222 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 23 ALL MAP 16 N/F TRUST N/F /'-- "-I PROPOSED LOT X20 v 1`' KOHLOFER ' DEMEULE MAP 16 LOT 232 __.../ , #2, IMPROROADWAY VEMENTS I PROPOSED PLAN BLANDEN m ;` ' 4 I I I Q Q I, ILOTP 231% I MYERS IBIT. CONC. PARKING I MAP 16 / BY CITY i #48 ROS #20 I / I l__._ ---� i #10 MAP 16 MAP 16 LOT 235 / I40 36 BIT. I MAP 16 LOT 229 ' #24 v PAR ING MAP 233 LOT #6 LON F34 LON/F80 PATTISON /� (MARCH 2015) # #38 # CON C. #30 N/F 14 (8± S IP ,CES) CSIMGGIN PATTISON 000 �i �........,......__,..p - - - - BASH - - - - - - - - li I SPERIDAKOS GRANITE culla BEA VER STREET Posh• , ZONING CHART REQUIRED PROVIDED -" - - - - _ - - (CURBPUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE) FND PER PUD MIN. LOT AREA 60,000 SF 362,000 SF FOOTNOTES: Griffin MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100' 161 .37' 1 ) REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. - En ineenn MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 2 LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD GRAPHIC SCALE _ _ — . _ Gro p, LLC g MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5% SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. 40 0 20 40 e0 160 _ _ MAP 16 LOT 242 _ MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 39.4% - - 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. - - - - N/F P.O Box 7061 MIN. . FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1 SEE ARCHITECTURAL_ DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART INC. HARMONY GROVE - - — 1 100 Cummins ' CORPORATION g Center, Suite 224G MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6' 4) 216 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE ( IN FEET ) _ _� _ _ _ Beverly, MA 01915 MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0' (1 .67 SP/UNIT). 11 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE 1 inch = 40 ft. _ _ MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15' BUILDING. �� _ _ —IDE RI pISTRICT __- - - — — _ .�-� - — T Tel: 978-927-5111 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 4 5) LOT AREA INCLUDES #1 & #5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. _ - SESEMENT _ _ �py4lRl�- - _ — _ -v Fax: 978-927-5103 MIN. PARKING -- 216 A GR - - _ -- - __ _ _ - HARM - - -_- _ — — — - - — —_ _ -- �I� MRM PROJECT H _ - ,� MANAGEMENT LLC W _ _ SALEM MA - �.�= - -- RR- TRA MAP 16 LOT 378 _ CT (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) - 1 pISTRI t �1 th _ - - _ _ 44,432± SQ. FT - -� - - - - - — , - — — — _�__� 1.02 ACRES _ _ RITY iir ICUA�THO SIDE _----- o M — 8, ��+�_ `"� — — _ _ TO 11 OVERALL — _ _ _ AL SPORTA _ _ _ _ _ -_-_ N _ _ -8 _-__-_-_ NAL TIDAL _: TRAN J _ I MAP 16 LOT 216 �► SITE LAYOUT M - TH RIWER CA- TTS BAY _ - - - - - - I N/F I PLAN \ NOR SSACHUS RAYMOND - _ - - AJ _ - - - - N \ 1 _ -� - - _ - - MAP 86 LOT 135A __ —� U N/F ��- --- —� MAP 26 LOT 40 - N z --- Scams 1"=40' SOUTHERN ESSEX _ - N/F SEWERAGE DISTRICT _ 5 MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY R R- TRACK _ _ -+ Job No,: 700 Ln e - OWN - - ��� FIG- 2 _ - BOUND _ - -+ File Name: P/P/s/h-b QSk 3/25/15 N U a` CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERMIT Location of Property: 3 Harmony Grove Road&60-64 Grove Street Applicant: MRM Project Management Proposed Date of Hearing: Address/PO Box: PO Box 388 Date of Submittal: City, State,Zip Code: Beverly, MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 I. Project Description: a. Zoning district: BPD b. Square footage of parcel: 296,660 sf c. Square footage of structure(s): Residential: 135.768 gsf; Commercial: 17,000 psf d. Square footage of footprint: Residential: 11,480 sf; Commercial: 6.864 sf e. No. of dwelling units (if applicable): 141 II. Additional Information: Information required includes this application and the following additional information. File one copy the application with City Clerk and fifteen (15) copies of the application and all . accompanying materials with the Planning Board (all copies must be stamped by City Clerk). a. A Site Plan at a scale of 1"=40', (or as established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in Section IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: 1. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction. 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas,walkways, and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways. 4. Location and type of external lighting. 5. Location,type,dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening. 6. Location and dimensions of utilities,gas,telephone,electrical communication, water,drainage, sewer and other waste disposal. 7. Location of snow removal areas. 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds, brooks, streams, wetlands, and marshes. 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site,with two-foot contours. 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural style. b. A brief narrative,as requested by the Planning Board addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: 1. Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow,circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting 5. Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area c. An Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. III. Procedure:. The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws.Notice of the filing of the petition shall be given to the City Clerk,Police Department,Department of Public Services,and School Department and further notice shall be given as required by the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit. The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the conditions,associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his succe r in title t al fate effects of same. gnature of Applicant Signature of Owner(at ached consent letter is also acceptable) //,0-// / -/G_ r/ Date Date FEE PAID: '> CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION SITE PLAN REVIEW Location of Property: 3 Harmony. Brove Rd. & Applicant:MRM Project Management, LLC 60-64 Grove Street Proposed Date of Hearing: Address/PO Box:PO Box 388 Date of Submittal: City, State,Zip Code: Beverly, MA 01915 Telephone: 978-922-7089 L Project Description: a. Zoning district: Bpn and R2 b. Square footage of parcel: v 296,660 sf c. Square footage ofstructure(s):Residential: 135,768 sf; Commercial: 17,000 sf d. Square footage offootprint:_Residenr;alr 11 .840 af• Cnmmen.1,1 - 6_R64 sf e. No.of dwelling units(if applicable): 141 II. Additional Information: Information required includes this application and the following additional information.File one copy of all information with City Clerk and fifteen(15)copies with the Planning Board (all copies must be stamped by City Clerk). a. A Site Plan at a scale of I"=40',(oras established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in Section IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: 1. Location and dimensions of all buildings and other construction. 2. Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas,walkways,and driveways. 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and access ways to adjacent public roadways. 4. Location and type of external lighting. 5. Location,type,dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening. 6. Location and dimensions of utilities,gas,telephone,electrical communication,water,drainage,sewer and other waste disposal. 7. Location of snow removal areas. 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds, brooks, streams, wetlands, and marshes. 9. Existing and proposed topography of the site,with two-foot contours. 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural style b. A brief narrative,as requested by the Planning Board addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: 1. Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow, circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting 5. Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area c. An Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. III. Procedure: The Planning Board shall,within 7 days after the filing of this application,transmit one copy of said application,plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings,City Engineer,Board of Health,Fire Prevention Officer and Conservation Commission who may,at their discretion,investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board.The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the above agencies or until thirty-five(35)days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report. The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports,in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws.The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit.The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit.The Planning Board may,as a condition of approval,require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers,by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds,of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor in title to alleviate the effects of same. ig a e f Applicant Signature of Owner(attached consent letter is also acceptable) >/a i6-% /d Date Date FEE PAID: Project Narrative In Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications For Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road 60 - 64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Introduction The project generally involves comprehensive redevelopment of the former Salem Oil & Grease factory site on Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road. As further described below, the redevelopment plans include construction of three multi-family residential buildings and re-use of an approximately 17,000 square-foot existing commercial office building. The redevelopment scheme will remove the many dilapidated structures from the property, restore vehicular access from Harmony Grove Road, and anchor the revitalization of the Mack Park neighborhood. 1. Buildings The project proposes construction of three residential buildings and reuse of an existing three-story office building. The residential buildings will each provide 47 units of one and two-bedroom apartments with four stories of living space. The residential buildings are designed with multiple gable roofs with varying siding types and colors - all designed to blend into the neighborhood by creating smaller massing elements similar in scale to nearby residential structures. Parking is provided in the basement of each building and adjacent to the buildings. The renovation of the existing office building on the opposite side of the canal is meant to honor the past by reusing the former Salem Oil & Grease administrative building while updating it to meet modern building code requirements. 2. Parkinq & Loading The residential buildings will each contain 33 spaces of parking within the Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 1 of 4 12/20/11 basement of the structures, supplemented with 116 spaces of surface parking, for a total of 215 spaces. The parking ratio for the residential units is 1.5 spaces per unit. Loading for the residential buildings will be limited to daytime and will occur at the front entrance to each building. The commercial building will have 24 spaces of surface level parking. This is equivalent to 1.4 spaces per 1,000 gsf of floor area. An existing loading dock at the rear of the commercial building will be maintained for loading purposes. 3. Traffic Flow and Circulation The main entrance for the residential buildings will be via an improved crossing of the North River Canal off of Harmony Grove Road. Secondary access and egress point will be from Grove Street. These access and egress locations, and the parking spaces adjacent to the buildings, create a longitudinal traffic pattern through the site. The garage parking for each residential building will have its own entrance point off of the longitudinal corridor, which will have the effect of distributing traffic movement. The commercial building will be accessed from Grove Street exclusively. 4. External Lighting The site lighting plan relies on "shoebox" style lighting fixtures to cast light downward onto the parking and pedestrian surfaces. These fixtures will be mounted on approximately 18-foot taillight standards. The topography of the site, which drops approximately 30-feet from Beaver Street to the North River canal, sets the light fixtures below the grade of nearby Beaver Street residences. The light fixtures include lenses to direct the "throw" of light and to minimize off-site dispersion. The exterior lighting circuits will be fitted with timers and ambient light sensors. Wall-packs or similar fixtures will be located at the secondary building entrances, and along the rear of the residential buildings. The wall-packs at the rear of the residential buildings are intended to cast light on the canal pathway. The wall packs will have shields and lenses to minimize unwanted light dispersion. Lamps in the lighting fixtures will be energy-efficient high-pressure sodium. 5. Landscaping and Screening A comprehensive landscaping plan is proposed to provide appropriate screening and natural amenities to the site. Approximately 2,700 plants will be placed at the site. The landscaping plan maximizes use of commercially-available native plant Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 2 of 4 12/20/11 species while providing year-round color. The main site entrance will include stone-masonry walls incorporating site signage and surrounded by evergreens and annual plantings. The site design intentionally maintains existing mature vegetation along the southwestern property boundary. This vegetation will provide natural screening of the site from the Beaver Street vicinity. The mature vegetation will be supplemented with plantings throughout the parking areas to fill-in specific locations. For example, lilac bushes will be planted above the proposed retaining wall along the main parking field. These shrubs will supplement the mature vegetation closer to the ground surface. The parking area surrounding the commercial building will be reconstructed with planting strips and beds around its perimeter. The planting beds proposed along Grove Street will significantly improve the appearance of this building. 6. Utilities Existingutility ut lily services to the site will be reused. The former industrial uses at the site required substantial water, sewer, and electricity services. Thero osed P P uses will generally have lower demands on these utilities than the former uses required. All of the buildings will have fire-suppression sprinklers and modem alarm systems. 7. Snow Removal Adequate snow storage is provided at key locations adjacent to the parking lots throughout the site (see Landscape Plan). Should snow storage capacity prove to be inadequate, the Federated Companies will remove snow from the site. 8. Natural Area Protection and Enhancement The site has been substantially disturbed by centuries of industrial uses. The proposed project will not disturb any natural areas. The project will assist efforts to enhance the quality of the North River Canal. Redevelopment of this site will facilitate environmental improvements along the canal, removal of existing dilapidated structures, and improve public access along the canal. Development of the pathway along the canal will coordinate with long-term off-site improvements, and thereby y enhance opportunities to enjoy the North River canal Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 3 of 4 12/20/11 l and improve bicycle and pedestrian transportation between Salem and Peabody. 9. Topography and Maintenance The topography of the site is characterized by generally flat land along the North River canal and along Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road, and a steep embankment along the southwestern edge of the property along Beaver Street. The proposed development takes advantage of this topographic change by keeping all of the proposed construction at the lower elevation, and maintaining the embankment with its mature vegetation along Beaver Street. This topographic change and mature vegetation provide a natural buffer which will assist in screening the project from the Beaver Street. Construction and maintenance of the site will be by the Federated Companies. Federated Companies has professional, experienced construction and property managers who understand the importance and value of properly maintained facilities. The buildings, parking areas, public-access walkway and the extensive landscaping plans included in this application will be professionally maintained. 10.Compatibility of Architecture with Surrounding Area The surrounding architecture is mainly industrial and residential. The Residential Buildings are designed with multiple gable roofs and three different siding types and colors all designed to minimize the size of the overall structures by creating smaller massing elements similar to the residential component of the area. The use of clapboards and shingles is in keeping with the residential design vocabulary evident throughout the city of Salem and New England. The renovation of the existing industrial building on the opposite side of the canal is meant to honor the past by maintaining the shell of the historic building while updating it to give the building a new sense of vitality for its contemporary purpose. The industrial building renovation will include new siding throughout and a glass exposure along Grove Street, which will clearly indicate the commercial nature of the building. Legacy Park Apartments At Harmony Grove Page 4 of 4 12120/11 Environmental Impact Statement In Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications For Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road 60 - 64 Grove Street & 3 Harmony Grove Road Introduction This Environmental Impact Statement discusses the proposed project in response to the topics presented in Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. For the reviewer's convenience, the topics are discussed in the order presented in the regulations. In the text below, italics represent the topic as provided in the regulations and the response follows the word "Response:" 1.0 Natural Environment 1.1 Air. 1.1.a Describe possible sources and duration of significant amounts of odors, smoke and dust. Response: There are no known sources of odors or smoke anticipated with the proposed project. Dust could be generated during the construction process, but will be minimized as outlined in 1.1.b. 1.1.b Describe precaution to be taken to eliminate or minimize the adverse environmental effects of the smoke, dust or odors generated. Response: Dust generated during construction will be minimized by the application of water and calcium chloride to travelled portions of the site. Dust control will depend on weather conditions and the construction activities ongoing at the time. Calcium chloride use will be minimized along the North River canal, to avoid potential water quality impacts. 1.1.c Describe the relationship of the location of the subdivision and prevailing wind patterns to nearby residences, businesses, recreation area, and other public areas. Legacy Park Apartments Page 1 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: Long term meteorological records suggest that prevailing winds are generally from the northwest during winter months and from the west-southwest during the summer months. Downwind properties in the winter months support primarily commercial and residential land uses; in the summer months commercial uses and the Harmony Grove Cemetery are downwind. The proposed residential and office uses at this site are unlikely to create odorous or noxious conditions that could migrate downwind. 1.1.d /f incineration of refuse is proposed for the subdivision, describe the effects resultant emissions will have on air quality in the area. Include proof that the incinerator complies with the latest local and state standards. Response: Standard commercial refuse and recyclables collection will be employed at the site. The refuse and recyclables hauler will be required to bring these materials to solid waste handling facilities complying with the applicable environmental requirements of the state the facility is located within. 1.2 Land 1.2.a Describe the existing general physical conditions of the site, including existing use, general topography, unusual geologic formations and soils, and how the project will effect these features. Response: The site is approximately 6.8 acres in size and is generally flat, with an embankment sloping up to Beaver Street on its southwestern side. The elevation change between Beaver Street and the site is approximately 30 feet. The sloped embankment contains some mature vegetation and is heavily littered with trash and debris apparently deposited from abutting properties. Most of the site is located above the 100-year flood elevation (elevation 10.8 NGVD datum). The portion of the site between the railroad tracks and at the main entrance off Harmony Grove Road varies in elevation from approximately 8.5 to 11 feet NGVD; the existing parking areas along Grove Street are constructed at approximately elevation 9.5 to 11 feet NGVD. The site is currently vacant. It was owned and operated by the Salem Oil & Grease Company for approximately 90 years until 2002. The site is developed with multiple industrial buildings with associated access driveways, parking lots, and material storage areas. The site is generally"run-down" with many degraded surfaces and debris scattered about the landscape. The site is bisected by the tidal North River Canal. Portions of the site along the North River Canal were at one time part of the tidal Mill Pond, an impoundment created by a dam located approximately at Grove Street. The dam was used to power industrial activity at and adjacent to the site. A variety of industrial activities have occurred at the site from the 1700's to today. Site soils are mapped by the United States Department of Agriculture — Soil Legacy Park Apartments Page 2 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove Conservation Service maps as being Urban Land. This mapping unit indicates that the soils have been significantly altered or obscured by urban works and structures. The portions of the site within the historical Mill Pond are filled lands. A limited amount of soil boring data is available from previous construction projects at the site. These generally indicate that in the central portion of the site, medium and fine sands and inorganic silts exist to approximately elevation -25 feet and overlay approximately 20 to 25 feet or more of medium stiff silty clay. Soils appear to be primarily sand and gravel closer to Beaver Street. The available soil boring data generally suggests that conventional construction techniques will be suitable for the construction project. As with any urban site with a limited geotechnical data set, soil conditions may vary causing the need to adapt construction techniques to the conditions occurring at the time of construction. The general condition of the existing buildings at and in the vicinity of the site suggest that conventional construction techniques can be effectively employed at the site. 1.2.b Describe any limitations on proposed project caused by subsurface soil and water conditions, and methods to be used to overcome them. Response: As stated above, conventional construction techniques are expected to be applicable to most of the site. The presence of fill along the North River Canal may require that portions of the buildings be supported by piles or other deep foundation methods extending through the fill into more competent soils below. Water conditions are unlikely to present a significant impediment to the proposed construction. The buildings will be constructed above grade with no basements. Utility installations may encounter water during construction and will be handled in appropriate manners Due to the past industrial activities at the site, a comprehensive site assessment is being undertaken by a Licensed Site Professional (LSP). Appropriate environmental remediation work and worker-safety precautions will be undertaken during construction based on the LSP's findings. 1.2.c Describe procedures and findings of percolation tests conducted on the site. Response: Percolation tests are not applicable to this project, which will be connected to an existing municipal sewer in Grove Street. Based on the soil conditions noted above, percolation rates would be expected to be moderate to rapid. 1.2.d Describe the types and amounts of land which will be permanently affected by construction of the subdivision. Response: All three parcels will be affected by the proposed construction. The 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel will be traversed with a new site access bridge and Legacy Park Apartments Page 3 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove roadway, and landscape work will occur along this corridor. The disturbance of 3 Harmony Grove Road will be approximately 25% of the 35,561 sf parcel. At the 60 Grove Street parcel, essentially all of the 26,946 sf parcel will be affected by the proposed improvements. The existing office building on this parcel will remain intact, but will be thoroughly renovated throughout. The barrel storage building will be removed, the parking area reconstructed, and the site landscaped. At the approximately 5.4 acre 64 Grove Street parcel, approximately one acre of land will remain undisturbed. This is primarily the strip of land along the southwest boundary of the parcel (the Beaver Street side) in which existing mature vegetation will be maintained. 1.2.e Describe proposed rough grading plans. Response: On the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel, a small amount of regrading will occur to accommodate the new bridge over the North River Canal. At the 60 Grove Street parcel, rough grades will not change. At the 64 Grove Street parcel, a combination of fill placement along the southwest face of the proposed buildings and cutting into the existing embankment will occur to provide a flat parking area at approximately the first floor level. Concrete block retaining walls are proposed on the uphill side of the parking lot to minimize disturbance of the existing embankment and its mature vegetation. Within the building footprints, the parking level will be approximately 10 feet below the first floor elevation. The parking level will be at approximately the same grade as the proposed landscaping and bike path along the North River canal In the northwestern corner of the site existing soils will be regraded to provide an approximately flat parking area near the railroad tracks. 1.2.f Describe location and extent of existing marshes, wetlands, or seasonal wet areas and any proposed alteration. Response: The North River Canal transects the project site. Between the 60 & 64 Grove Street parcels, the canal is confined by granite block retaining walls. The canal transects the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel and is confined by sloping embankments in this parcel. No alteration of wetland areas will be necessary for the project with the exception of minor or temporary disturbances necessary to install a new bridge, utilities and roadway across the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel. 1.3 Water and Wetlands 1.3.a Evaluate how and to what extent the project will affect the quality and quantity of any existing or potential public or private water supply, including watersheds, reservoirs and groundwater. Legacy Park Apartments Page 4 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove industrial i of this portion of Salem and h close Response: Due to thehistory p the o proximity of the site to saline water bodies, this site has no potential use as a public or private water supply. Site redevelopment will therefore not directly benefit potential water supplies. Redevelopment may significantly improve groundwater quality at the site by facilitating environmental cleanup work under the direction of the Licensed Site Professional. Groundwater quality improvements will also improve quality in the North River Canal, since groundwater at the site discharges to the canal. The proposed project includes a new drainage system that is designed to be in complete compliance with the applicable standards of the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Guidelines. Stormwater runoff from the proposed parking lots will be treated prior to being discharged. Roof runoff from the proposed buildings will also be captured and infiltrated to provide groundwater recharge in accordance with the standards. These stormwater management improvements will also benefit water quality in the North River Canal. 1.3.b Describe the methods to be used during construction to control erosion and sedimentation and siltation including use of sediment basins and type of mulching, matting, or temporary vegetation, approximate size and location of land to be cleared at any given time and length of time to exposure; covering of soil stockpiles, and other control methods used. Evaluate effectiveness of proposed methods on the site and on the surrounding areas. Response: A comprehensive erosion control program will be undertaken during . construction. Haybales and silt fence will be installed along the downgradient edge of the proposed work area as approved by the local Conservation Commission. A construction entrance will also be installed at the Grove Street entrance and will be maintained until the pavement binder course is installed. Silt sacks will be installed and maintained in the vicinity of the proposed construction entrance. Only the portion of land that is affected by the redevelopment of the site will be cleared. To help prevent off-site erosion, disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched as soon as practicable. Proposed slopes steeper than 3h:1v shall be stabilized with erosion control matting and seeded. Temporary stockpiles of existing on-site soil materials will be created during construction. Stockpiles will be encircled with erosion control barriers and covered. Additional earth materials received for construction are expected to be ordered as needed and installed upon arrival. 1.3.c Describe the permanent methods to be used to control erosion and sedimentation. Include description of: Legacy Park Apartments Page 5 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 1.3.c.1 -any areas subject to flooding or ponding; Response: All areas located within the 100-year flood zone will be stabilized with either bituminous pavement or landscaping. No erosion is anticipated. 1.3.c.2-proposed surface drainage system; Response: A conventional piped drainage system is proposed. Stormwater runoff from all paved surfaces will be directed to and treated by catchbasins or other treatment devices prior to being discharged to the North River Canal. Each catchbasin will be equipped with a 4-foot deep sump and hood to prevent sediments, oils and floatable trash from discharging directly into the river. Most of the paved parking area will also be treated by Stormcepter pretreatment units. Stormwater from the roofs of the proposed buildings will be captured and conveyed to infiltration beds for groundwater recharge. During extreme storm events, surplus roof runoff will flow into the on-site drainage system. 1.3.c.3-proposed land grading and permanent vegetation cover, Response: The proposed land regrading is shown on the project Grading and Drainage Plan. Regraded areas will be stabilized as soon as practicable with a well vegetated grass surface or landscaped planting bed. 1.3.c.4 -methods to be used to protect existing vegetation; Response: The clearing limit will be restricted to the area necessary to construct the proposed project. Erosion control barriers or other methods of demarcation (i.e. snow fence, flagging, etc.) will to be set along the clearing limit at the beginning of construction. Erosion control barriers will not be removed until work has been completed and stabilized. 1.3.c.5- the relationship of the development to the topography,• Response: The proposed development requires retaining walls and regrading along the southerly portion of the project site. The remaining topography will remain approximately the same as current conditions. All areas disturbed during construction will be stabilized with vegetation or finish surfaces as soon as practicable. 1.3.c.6- any existing or proposed alterations of shorelines, marshes or seasonal wet areas, Response: None 1.3.c.7- any existing or proposed flood control or wetland easements, Response: None Legacy Park Apartments Page 6 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 1.3.c:8-estimated increase of peak runoff caused by altered surface conditions, and methods to be used to return water to the soils. Response: Drainage calculations have been performed and are separately provided. Future peak stormwater runoff rates are similar to existing conditions. Groundwater recharge is proposed through a large infiltration bed located beneath parking areas. 1.3.d Discuss the probability that the project will increasepollution or turbidity levels within receivingwaterway and the precautions to be taken to minimize the Y effects. Response: The project is likely to reduce pollution and turbidity levels within the North River Canal. The proposed project includes conducting environmental clean-upwork to address contamination remaining from past industrial uses. � The proposed project will.provide stable surfaces and clean impervious surfaces routed through a modern drainage system. Under current conditions, there are little if any stormwater management controls at the site. The placement of deep sump catch basins, stormwater pretreatment devices, and infiltration beds at the site will reduce the amount of pollutants that are conveyed from the project site during storm events. 1.3.e Discuss the project's effect on the waterway's aquatic biota and use as habitats. Response: For reasons specified above, the project is likely to improve water quality in the North River Canal. This will in turn improve aquatic habitat and its ability to support a variety of biota. 1.3.f Discuss the project's effects on groundwater quality and supply and efforts to recharge groundwater supplies. Response: As discussed above, the proposed project is likely to improve groundwater quality at the site. The construction of groundwater recharge structures below parking areas are intended to recharge groundwater supplies so that on an annual basis, groundwater recharge is approximately equal to pre- development conditions. 1.3.g Discuss what effect the project will have on increasing the incidence of flooding, including areas outside the subdivision. Response: Drainage calculations have been performed for the proposed project. Due to the extensive stormwater management improvements proposed for the site, the estimated peak stormwater runoff rates following construction will be similar to existing conditions. Therefore, no increase in flooding incidences is anticipated due to the project. 1.3.h Discuss the effect of the proposed sewerage disposal methods on surface and groundwater supplies and quality. Legacy Park Apartments Page 7 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: No impacts to groundwater supplies from the proposed sewerage system are expected. Sewage will be conveyed through sealed pipes and structures to the municipal sewer system in Grove Street. 1.4 Enem 1.4.a Describe the types and increased quantity of energy required to serve the needs of the project residents. Response: The estimated power annual power consumption is approximately: Residential Buildings Commercial Building Heating Load: 6,500 MMBtu 500 MMBtu Electrical Load: 4,000 MMBtu 450 MMBtu 1.4.b Indicate what the sources of this energy will be. Response: Natural gas will be used for heating. Electricity will be used for lights, appliances, and cooling. Adequate utilities are available adjacent to the site. 1.5 Noise 1.5.a Describe the time, duration and types of noises generated by the project, both during and after construction. Response: During the construction phase, construction activities are expected to begin at approximately 7:00 AM and be completed by 6:00 PM. Moderate noise levels associated with the construction equipment is anticipated. During the building demolition phase, a wrecking ball will be likely employed. During the foundation construction phase, noise associated with the installation of pile foundation supports may occur (eg. pile driving). Generally, soil conditions appear to not require blasting, so use of that construction technique during this project should be minimal. During the operational phase, noise levels are not expected to be significant. Multifamily residential developments generally generate little noise. 1.5.b Discuss what effect these noises will have on both humans and wildlife. Response: During the construction phase, OSHA noise level requirements will be satisfied in the work zones. Beyond the work zones, noise levels are expected to drop to moderate levels prior to reaching neighboring housing units. By maintaining mature vegetation along Beaver Street, noise impacts are minimized. The presence of existing buildings and structures on the east side of the side will block noises emanating in this direction. Legacy Park Apartments Page 8 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove The construction activities will create noise levels noticeable to humans and wildlife. However, as noted above, the noise levels are expected to be typical of residential construction projects, and of a temporary nature. The post- construction noise associated with the multi-family dwellings is not expected to be significant. 1.5.c Describe the controls which will be used to eliminate or minimize the effects of these noises. Response: Construction noise effects will be minimized by 1) the use of mufflers on all construction equipment, 2) providing temporary power to the worksite so gas powered generators are not required, and 3) limiting the work hours as noted above. Maintaining existing mature vegetation to the maximum extent practicable between the work area and the off-site residences, as proposed by the Applicant, will minimize off-site noise levels. 1.6 Local Flora and Fauna 1.6.a Discuss the project's effects on land-based ecosystems, such as the indigenous wildlife,_stream bank cover, and vegetal or wooded growth. Response: The project will redevelop land that has been substantially altered by previous activities at the site. The existing land surfaces are degraded; wildlife activity at the site is minimal. Disturbance of stream bank cover and the wooded growth along the perimeter of the property has been minimized. 1.6.b Describe proposed types and amounts of vegetative cover. Response: All cleared and disturbed areas, except buildings and hardscape surfaces, are to be covered with planting beds or loam and seed. A Landscaping Plan has been prepared by a landscape architect indicating placement of approximately 2,700 trees, shrubs and perennials to be planted at the project site. 1.6.c Discuss the existence of rare or endangered plant, wildlife or fish species in the project area. Response: There are no known rare or endangered plant, wildlife or fish species in the project area. Efforts are underway to improve Rainbow Smelt spawning in the North River. The water quality improvements associated with site redevelopment will directly benefit these efforts. 2.0 Man-Made Environment 2.1 Land use 2.1.a Describe how the proposed project conforms with the growth plans for the area and the city in general. Legacy Park Apartments Page 9 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: In 2003 the City prepared the North River Canal Corridor (NRCC) plan, which addressed land southeast of the project site. Although the NRCC plan did not directly address the subject site, the proposed project is consistent with the plan mission in that it is rehabilitating an abandoned and dilapidated Brownfield site and creating a neighborhood use adjacent to the existing residential uses. The commercial component of the project integrates well with its immediately abutting land uses. The NRCC plans provide a framework for new growth and development in the North River area primarily consisting of mixed uses, which is consistent with this proposal. The proposed project conforms to other growth plans of the city because it provides improvements along an existing entrance corridor (Harmony Grove Road, Grove Street, etc.). Also, the proposed project provides a bike path along the canals edge which is generally consistent with the 1996 City of Salem Master Plan. 2.1.b Describe land uses adjacent to the project. Response: The Beaver Street and Silver Street residential neighborhoods are located to the south and west of the project site. The Harmony Grove Cemetery is located to the north, along the northerly side of Harmony Grove Road. Commercial and industrial buildings are located to the northeast along both sides of Grove Street. To the east of the site, a mixed-use development (at 28 Goodhue Street) was recently permitted. The 28 Goodhue Street project contained commercial space on the first floor level and 44 units of residential condominiums on the upper three levels. 2.1.c Describe any existing or proposed public or common recreational or open areas within the subdivision. Response: A bike path with seating areas is proposed along the southerly edge of the canal. Public bike path access during daylight hours is proposed. 2.1.d Discuss the site's proximity to transportation, shopping, educational facilities, recreational facilities, etc. Response: Public Transportation — MBTA Bus Route 465, stop at the intersection of Nicholas and Boston Street (0.1 mi.), and Salem Train Station (1 mi.). Shopping —Walgreens Pharmacy (0.2 mi.); Peabody Stop & Shop (0.5 mi.); and North Shore Mall (2.5 mi.). Educational Facilities — Salem High School (1.0 mi.); Collins Middle School (0.6 mi.); Bates Elementary School (1.1 mi.); and Salem Public Library (0.7 mi.). Recreational Facilities— Salem Golf Course (1.3 mi.); Mack Park (0.1 mi.); and Gallows Hill Park (0.5 mi.). Legacy Park Apartments Page 10 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 2.2 Density 2.2.a Provide a tabulation of proposed buildings by type, size (number of bedrooms, floor area), ground coverage, and a summary showing the percentage of the tract to be occupied by buildings, parking and other paved vehicular areas, and usable open space. Response: Table 2.2: Summary of Site Development Description / Location: 64 Gove Street 60 Grove Street Total Site Land Use Multi-Family Commercial Mixed Residential Building Number of Buildings 3 1 4 Number of Units/Building 47 TBD — Number of Res. Units 141 — 141 Number of Bedrooms 3 @ 83 — 249 Number of Stories 4 3 — Building Footprint 3 @ 11,480 SF 6,864 SF 41,304 SF Gross Floor Area 3 @ 45,256 SF 17,000 +/- SF 152,768 +/- SF Lot Area 234,152 SF 26,659 SF 296,659 SF Building Coverage 14.7% 25.7% 13.9% Pavement Coverage 30.4% 44.9% 29.5% Open Space 54.9% 29.7% 56.6% 1 — Includes 3 Harmony Grove Road 2.3 Zoning 2.3.a Indicate the zoning designations for the site and adjacent areas. Response: Site: Residential Two-Family District (R2) Business Park Development District (BPD) Wetland and Flood Hazard Overlay District (WFHOD) Entrance Corridor Overlay District (ECOD) Adjacent: Residential One-Family District (131) North River Canal Corridor (NRCC) Industrial (1) 2.4 Architecture 2.4.a Describe the architectural and landscaping techniques which will be used to blend the structures with the surrounding area. Response: The exterior facades of the proposed residential building will have the Legacy Park Apartments Page 11 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove appearance of traditional wood siding and shingles, consistent with the adjacent residential areas. The project site will be well landscaped with lawns and planting beds (approximately 2,700 trees, shrubs, and perennials), and will maintain existing mature vegetation along Beaver Street. 2.4.b Discuss the heights of the structures in relation to the surrounding area. Response: The proposed residential buildings are 4-stories tall along their front (southerly) side and 5-stories tall along their rear (northerly/river) side. Parking is proposed in the lower level of the buildings. The ridge elevation of the proposed buildings will be approximately the same as the ridge elevations of the two-story residential buildings along Beaver Street. 2.4.c Discuss the project's visual impact and possible interference with natural views. Response: The project will significantly improve natural views at and near the site. The industrial history of the site is clearly apparent in the existing dilapated buildings, abandoned roadways and storage areas, and crumbling facades. The new buildings and landscaping, which maximize use of native species, will provide year-round color and rid this section of Salem of the existing eyesores. The North River Canal bike path will provide scenic opportunities to enjoy the ongoing North River restoration efforts. 2.4.d Describe type of construction building materials used, location of common areas, location and type of service facilities (laundry, trash, garbage disposal). Response: The proposed residential buildings will generally be wood and steel framed structures with weather-resistant clapboard and shingle exteriors. Common parking facilities will be provided in the lower level of the apartment buildings and on the project site. The landscaped areas surrounding the buildings and along the North River Canal are designated as common areas for recreational activities. Individual laundry facilities will be provided in each apartment unit; common refuse and recyclable disposal areas will be provided in each building. 2.5 Historic Buildings, Historical Sites and Archeological Sites 2.5.a Indicate location and significance of any historic buildings or sites on or adjacent to the project. Response: None 3.0 Public Facilities 3.1 Water Supply, Flow, Pressure and Distribution. 3.1.a Describe the groundwater and/or surface water supply to be used. Legacy Park Apartments Page 12 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Response: Municipal water will be used. Salem obtains water from surface water supplies (Wenham Lake & Ipswich River). 3.1.b Discuss the demands of the project for consumption and fire protection. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, the demand for domestic water consumption is estimated to be approximately 25,700 gallons/day. The peak demand for fire protection for any on-site building is estimated to be approximately 1,500 gallons per minute. The buildings will be equipped with fire suppression sprinklers and hard-wired fire alarm systems. 3.2 Sanitary Sewerage Connection. Distribution and Facilities. 3.2.a Discuss the quantity and type of sewage which will be generated by the project. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, the estimated sewage generation by the proposed project is approximately 28,500 gallons/day. 3.2.b Describe the method of sewage which will be generated by the project. Response: Domestic sanitary sewage. 3.3 Storm Drainage Facilities 3.3.a Describe where connection to the City system is proposed. Response: There is no proposed connection to a municipal drainage system. The project will drain to the North River Canal through a modern stormwater management system. 3.4 Disposition of Stormwater 3.4.a Indicate the location of all proposed outfalls. Response: Stormwater runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces will be captured, treated, and discharged to the North River Canal at four outfall locations as shown on Sheet C-4: One outfall is located near the Grove Street Bridge, one at the westerly end of the renovated commercial building, one near the railroad bridge, and the fourth near the proposed vehicle bridge. Drainage patterns are generally similar to existing conditions. 3.4.b Describe the effect of the outfalls and their discharge on the receiving waters, i.e., increased flows, pollution etc. Response: As described above, the proposed project is expected to improve Legacy Park Apartments Page 13 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove receiving water quality and lessen pollutant discharges from the site. Proposed stormwater discharge rates will be similar to existing conditions. No flooding impacts are anticipated due to site redevelopment. 3.4.c. Discuss the quantity of stormwater to be discharged. Response: The pre- and post-development volumes of stormwater runoff from the project site are as follows: 2-year 10-year 25-year 100-year Pre-Development c 61,288 103,026 130,748 165,158 Post-Development 61,070 1 102,198 1 129,630 163,769 3.5 Refuse Disposal 3.5.a. Estimate the quantity and types of refuse that will be generated by the subdivision. Response: Assuming full occupancy of the commercial and apartment buildings and two people per bedroom, approximately 2,000 pounds of refuse and recyclables will be generated per day. 3.5.b Describe the proposed methods of refuse disposal. Response: Each residential building will be equipped with a dedicated trash and recycling area within the basement. Additionally, fenced enclosed areas will be provided adjacent to each building for spare and full containers. For the commercial building a small dumpster and recyclables storage area will be provided near the loading. Refuse and recyclables will be managed by a private disposal company. The transfer station on Swampscott Road is available to residents for disposal of larger items and is located approximately 2 miles from the project site. 3.6 Traffic Facilities 3.6.a Discuss future vehicular circulation patterns including number and types of vehicles. Response: Two-way traffic is proposed through the residential portion of the project site with entrances at Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. The Harmony Grove Road entrance will be the primary entrance to the site. The average weekday traffic is estimated to be 978 trips per day (i.e. 489 entering, 489 leaving) for the residential portion of the site and approximately 166 (i.e. 83 entering, 83 leaving) for the commercial portion of the site. The total weekday traffic from the project site is estimated at approximately 1,144 vehicle trips per a day. Most traffic will be passenger vehicles. Legacy Park Apartments Page 14 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 3.6.b Describe the proposed pedestrian circulation pattern. Response: Sidewalks are provided along the main internal site roadway, providing access to all of the buildings and parking areas and connecting with existing sidewalks on Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. A public bike path is proposed along the North River and will be wide enough to allow for foot travel as well. 3.6.c Discuss the location and number of parking spaces proposed. Response: On the residential portion of the project site, parking is proposed within the building basements, along the front of the building, and in the westerly parking lot. A total of 215 parking spaces are provided for the residential buildings (1.52 spaces/unit). For the commercial building, 24 parking spaces are provided. Per Salem zoning regulations, this would allow for a business with a total of 24 employees. 3.7 Electric power 3.7.a Discuss the power demand of the subdivision. Response: Approximately 500 M (peak). 3.7.b. Discuss the source of the electric power and the method of supplying the area. Response: National Grid will provide the power. The existing overhead system for the 60 Grove Street commercial building will remain. For the residential buildings, underground electrical services will be provided from an existing utility pole located along the southerly side of the site. The service will be routed through pad mount transformers located adjacent to the proposed parking lots. 3.8 Gas 3.8.a Discuss the demands of the subdivision. Response: Approximately 2,000 MBTU (peak). 3.8.b Describe what the gas will be used for in the area. Response: Natural gas will be used for heating. 3.8.c Describe the source of gas supply and the proposed method of supplying the area. Response: National Grid is the local natural gas supplier. An existing gas main is located within Grove Street. Legacy Park Apartments Page 15 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove 4.0 Community Services 4.1 Schools 4.1.a Discuss the effect of the subdivision on existing schools, including number and ages of children generated by the subdivision. Response: Based the 2000/2001 National Center of Educational Statistics and the US Census 2000 for Salem there were 5,007 students in the Salem Public Schools and 17,492 occupied housing units yielding 0.29 students per a household. The number of students generated by the 141 housing units is approximately 40. There is not enough statistical information to derive an approximate age of the children. 4.1.b Describe the location of the nearest existing schools. Response: The locations of the nearest public schools are Bates Elementary School (1.1 mi.); Collins Middle School (0.6.mi.); and Salem High School (1.0 mi.). 4.2 Recreation 4.2.a Describe existing and proposed recreational facilities, including active and passive types, and age groups participating, and state whether recreational facilities and open space are available to all Salem residents. Response: Recreational facilities in the general area are Salem Golf Course (1.3 mi.), Mack Park (0.1 mi.), and Gallows Hill Park (0.5 mi.). The listed facilities are available to all Salem residents. 4.2.b Indicate location and width of existing and proposed pedestrian ways, bikeways or bridle paths. Response: A proposed 10-foot wide public pedestrian and bike path is proposed along the North River Canal from Grove Street to the existing railroad crossing. 4.3 Police 4.3.a Estimate the total population projected for the subdivision. Response: Based on the 2000 US Census results for Salem the average household population is 2.24 persons. Applying this population to the proposed 141 residential units yields approximately 315 persons. 4.3.b Estimate the total number of automobiles for the area. Response: The total estimated number of vehicles at the project site is estimated to be approximately 240 vehicles. This is based on 1.5 vehicles per Legacy Park Apartments Page 16 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove residential unit and 24 vehicles for the commercial building. 4.4 Fire 4.4.a Discuss the total number of buildings to be constructed and their types and construction. Response: Three wood and steel framed apartment buildings are proposed on the 64 Grove Street site. One existing wood framed commercial building will remain on the 60 Grove Street site.. 4.4.b .Describe the source and quantity of water available for fire protection for the area. Response: Existing public water mains are located in Grove Street (8" & 12" diameter) and Beaver Street (8" diameter). Existing hydrants are also located in front of the 64 Grove Street parcel and adjacent to the existing way off of Beaver Street. An existing private main (6" diameter) extends down the aforementioned way onto the 64 Gove Street parcel. A private main (8" diameter) is proposed to connect to the existing private main and extend to the public main in Gove Street to create a looped water main. Three hydrants and dedicated building sprinkler services are proposed along the proposed main. 4.5 Public Works 4.5.a. Calculate the total linear feet of roadway to be publicly maintained and plowed. Response: No pubic roadways are proposed. 4.5.b Calculate the linear feet of street drains, culverts, sanitary sewers, and waterlines to be publicly maintained. Response: No publicly maintained utilities are proposed. 5.0 Human Considerations 5.1 Aesthetics and Visual Impact 5.1.a Discuss the change in the present character of the area due to the projects, i.e., land use, density of development, etc. Response: The proposed project will be a substantial betterment to the neighborhood. As noted above, the existing industrial site is run-down and falling down. Over the past five years, the Salem Police have visited the property approximately 35 times due to vandalism, theft, fires, and reports of breaking and entering. The proposed land uses are consistent with multiple projects recently permitted Legacy Park Apartments Page 17 of 18 December 20, 2012 at Harmony Grove within the project area. The density of the proposed development is consistent with local zoning regulations. The proposed project will improve the character of the area 5.1.b Discuss the measures to be taken to minimize the adverse effects of the project, i.e., architecture, buffers etc. Response: The project site will be landscaped to minimize potential adverse effects. The developer will minimize the amount of vegetation removed along the southerly boundary to maintain a natural buffer between the proposed project and abutters. The proposed buildings have clean lines, classic colonial styling, and varied surface materials and color to provide visual relief. The buildings will blend well with the neighborhood. 5.2 _ Parks. Forests and Recreational Areas 5.2.a Discuss how the siting and construction of the project will affect existing and potential park and recreation areas, open spaces, natural areas, and scenic values. Response: No affects anticipated. The proposed project will clean-up and enhance natural areas. The bike path could help link other open space projects along the North River Canal. The undeveloped portions of the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel could be made available in the future to the City for open space or natural area uses. 5.2.b. Discuss how the project will affect recreational opportunities in the area due to removal of parks, forests, or open areas from public use. Response: The proposed project will not remove parks, forest, or open space from public use. The propose project will improve public open space areas. 5.3 Public Health 5.3.a Discuss the project's effect on residents'public health due to changes in water quality, air quality, noise levels, etc. Response: The proposed project may improve the health of residents' through the removal of vacant industrial buildings, environmental remediation work, and anticipated improvements in groundwater and surface water quality. Legacy Park Apartments Page 18 of 18 December 20,2012 at Harmony Grove Decision — Lela c. P6t(e-- CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Decision (Corrected Decision) 1, 3 & 5 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street j e Map 16, Lots 236, 237 239, 377&378 r c m ell -.I --� x_ 07 October 26, 2012 n T D s MRM Project Management, LLC c P.O. Box 388 Beverly, MA 01915 RE: Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Decision for Legacy Park at Harmony Grove Apartments On February 2, 2012, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing under Section 7.3, Planned Unit Development, Section 9.5, Site Plan Review, and Section 8.1, Flood Hazard Overlay District (FHOD), of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, at the request of MRM Project Management, LLC, for the properties located at 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street, (Map 16, Lots 236, 237 and 239). The proposed project includes construction of three multi-family residential buildings (total of 141 units), re-use of an existing 17,000 square foot commercial office building, associated parking and landscaping, and a bicycle path providing public access to the North River Canal. The Public Hearing was continued to February 16, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), March 1, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), March 15, 2012, April 5, 2012, April 19, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), May 3, 2012, May 17, 2012, June 7, 2012, June 21 (but was not heard on that date), July 5, 2012, July 19, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), September 6, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), September 11, 2012, September 20, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), October 1, 2012, and October 18, 2012. At the hearing on October 1, 2012, the applicant presented a plan showing the addition of two adjacent parcels to the Planned Unit Development, 1 and 5 Harmony Grove Road (Map 16, Lots 377 and 378). The continued public hearing on October 18, 2012 and revised project with additional parcels was properly re-advertised and additional abutters notified. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 ♦ WWW.SALEM.com The Planning Board, after numerous public hearings and review of submitted materials and testimony, hereby finds that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 7.3 Planned Unit Development, as follows: 1) 7.3.1 Purpose—The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD), which incorporates a mix of housing, commercial space and open space, meets the purpose of Planned Unit Development, Section 7.3, to ensure compliance with the Master Plan of the City of Salem, Neighborhood Master Plan of the North River Canal Corridor, and good zoning practice. The proposed Planned Unit Development will promote the purpose of Section 7.3 by redeveloping a contaminated, blighted brownfield site and bringing it into productive reuse. The 1996 Master Plan emphasizes the presence of vacant industrial properties as one of the most important land use issue facing the City of Salem (City of Salem Master Plan Update and Action Plan, 1996, page 23), and highlights the difficulty of redeveloping these properties, particularly those with environmental contamination. While the property is not within the NRCC neighborhood or zoning district, it is adjacent to it, and shares many of the characteristics of the former industrial parcels in the NRCC. The Neighborhood Master Plan for the North River Canal Corridor(2003) promotes constructing a waterfront pathway along the banks of the North River (Section 2.8), providing waterfront access along the canal, unlocking redevelopment north of Bridge Street, and improving the image of the canal edges (Section 3.3). Further, the mixture of uses in the planned unit development is determined to be sufficiently advantageous to render it appropriate to depart from the normal requirements of the districts. The mixture of residential, commercial and open space/recreational uses proposed is appropriate, and the departure from strict provisions of zoning classifications, specifically residential use in the Business Park Development zoning district, is justified by the cleanup of the formerly contaminated and dangerous property, rehabilitation of a blighted site, location of new housing near the Salem MBTA commuter rail station, and construction of a multi-use path along the canal that continues the walking and biking trail system proposed for the North River Canal Corridor in its neighborhood master plan and in other NRCC development projects. The Planned Unit Development would not result in a net negative environmental impact. The project requires remediation of a property contaminated from its former industrial use. The cleanup of the site, introduction of controlled drainage infrastructure, and erosion prevention measures will result in improvements to the natural environment on the site and surrounding it, including the water quality in the North River Canal. 2) 7.3.2 Applicability—The proposed PUD meets the minimum size requirement of 60,000 square feet; the development parcels total 362,000 square feet. The underlying zoning districts of the proposed development parcels are largely Business Park Development, with a small portion of Industrial; both are eligible zoning districts for PUD treatment. A portion of 64 Grove Street, which is mostly zoned Business Park Development, is zoned Residential Two-Family, which does not allow PUD. However, the PUD development does not extend more than 30 feet into this more restrictive zoning district, and so is allowable under the Salem Zoning Ordinance (Section 2.4, Lot Split by Boundary Line). 2 3) 7.3.3 Uses—All proposed uses, including residential multi-family and commercial, are allowed in a PUD development. ➢ 7.3.3.2—A commercial use (office space) is proposed within the PUD project site. However, it is not directly adjacent to a residential zoning district. ➢ 7.3.3.3 —In the Business Park Development district, residential uses and associated improvements cannot exceed 50% of the land area of the parcel. The residential development, including associated improvements such as driveways, parking and landscaping, comprise less than 50% of the total land area of the project site. 4) 7.3.4 Dimensional Requirements: ➢ 7.3.4.1. Bulk, yards, parking and loading needs were evaluated by the Planning Board and found to be adequate. ➢ 7.3.4.2. No individual house lots are proposed. The Planning Board finds the amount of frontage provided on the project site to be adequate and appropriate to the surrounding neighborhood. ➢ 7.3.4.3. No individual house lots are proposed. The Planning Board finds the amount of usable and accessible open area within the total development is adequate. ➢ 7.3.4.4. No proposed residential building on the site exceeds four(4) stories, as determined by the Salem Building Commissioner/Zoning Officer. 5) 7.3.5 Open Space—the applicant/project owner will provide an easement along the proposed bicycle path and directly adjacent areas to allow for public access and recreational use by residents of the City as a condition of this application (see Conditions, below). The Planning Board hereby makes the following findings pertaining to the Flood Hazard District Special Permit Application: 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located. 2. There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lot(s) caused by either overspill from waterbodies or high runoff. 3. Utilities, including gas, electricity, fuel, water and sewage disposal, shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, shortcircuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on October 18, 2012, the Planning Board voted by a vote of eight (8) in favor (Chuck Puleo, Tim Kavanagh, Randy Clarke, Lewis Beilman, Tim Ready, Mark George, Helen Sides, and George McCabe), none opposed, and one abstaining(John Moustakis) to approve the Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood 3 Hazard District Special Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform to the plans entitled, "Site Plan for Mixed-Use Development: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove, 60 & 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road, Salem, MA December 2011," prepared by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC, LeBlanc Survey Associates, Beauds Art, Inc., Sebego Technics, WLS Lighting Systems, for MRM Project Management, LLC, including pages N-1, C-1, C-2, C-3A-C, C-SA-C, C-6, C-7, C-8, 1 of 1 (Landscaping Plan), 1 of 1 (Photometric Plan), A.1.1, A2.2, dated December 2011 and last revised June 20, 2012; page A2.1, last dated July 2, 2012; C-4A-C and C-8, last dated September 10, 2012, and pages C-3 and C-9, last dated October 1, 2012. 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed to be a significant change by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 3. Project Delays The developer, his successors or assigns shall notify the Department of Planning and Community Development if work on the site ceases for any reason for a period of six (6) months. In this event, the applicant shall be required to appear before the Planning Board and report to the Board the reason(s) why work has ceased at the project and a schedule of when work will begin again at the site, as well as a date of final project completion. If substantial work has not commenced on the site, as deemed by the Board, and such work is not anticipated to begin within two (2) years of the date of the Planning Board's original decision, the applicant shall notify the Board and, prior to the two-year anniversary of the issuance of the permit, shall request an extension of the permit from the Board. Applicant shall provide in such request any and all materials the Board may require to make a determination on the extension request, including but not limited to: studies, reports or new plans, at the applicant's expense, as requested by the Board and deemed necessary by the City Planner. 4. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two- (2) year period. c. Any street trees removed as a result of construction shall be replaced. The location of the trees shall be approved by the City Planner prior to replanting. d. Final completed landscaping shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Signage 4 All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner in accordance with the City of Salem sign ordinance prior to the issuance of a sign permit. Approval of the site plans does not represent approval of proposed signage. 6. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the residential buildings. c. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22, Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. b. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling, blasting or rock hammering on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. c. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of demolition and construction of the project. d. All construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site, must be located completely on the site. g.- All sidewalks, roadways, utilities, landscaping, etc. damaged during construction shall be replaced or repaired to their pre-construction condition, or better. h. A construction traffic/phasing management plan and schedule shall be submitted to the Department of Planning& Community Development and Police Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. Health Department and Board of Health All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Health Department and Board of Health, including but not limited to the following: 5 a. The units must comply with all the requirements of Chapter II of the State Sanitary code: 105CMR410 including but not limited to: ➢ Screens for windows ➢ Adequate trash disposal facilities ➢ Adequate ventilation ➢ Provide heating during the heating season at the required temperatures b. Provide a mosquito control plan for the catch basins. c. All units that are rented must be granted a certificate of fitness by the Board of Health prior to occupancy. A copy must be provided to the renter. d. If the units are sub-metered, then the owner must fill sub-metering affidavit for each individual unit prior to renting unit. If the affidavit is not filed, tenant cannot be charged for water. e. Applicant must submit a trash disposal plan to ensure there is adequate capacity for storage of trash onsite, including contingencies to address tenant changeovers and other high trash disposal events. f. Building owner is required to ensure that adequate contingencies are in place to address pest control/remediation. Specifically: ➢ A pest control survey is to be done prior to commencement of construction. ➢ There is to be a pre-baiting program in place. ➢ There is to be an ongoing pest monitoring program and a program to respond to complaints from abutters. ➢ Applicant is to submit a written description of the program and ongoing results of pest control site visits has to be available for inspection. ➢ Reports must include any rodent activity and actions taken. The locations should be mapped and activity identified by location of stations. 9. Office of the City Engineer The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following: a. Applicant is to provide a completed NO[ and SWPPP to the Planning Department prior to any land disturbance, and in any event, prior to issuance of a building permit. b. Applicant is to provide a completed and signed Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement to the Planning Department prior to obtaining a building permit. c. Applicant is to provide detailed design plans stamped by a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer for the proposed retaining walls for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit. d. Applicant is to provide a step-backwater analysis for the 10-, 50- and 100-year flood events for both existing and proposed conditions to demonstrate the adequacy of the hydraulic opening, structure depth and profile of the access road, for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit for the residential buildings or the bridges. e. Applicant is to provide a detailed structural, geotechnical and hydraulic design for the bridges for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit for the residential buildings or vehicular bridge. Applicant is to provide a detailed 6 structural, geotechnical and hydraulic design for the pedestrian bridge for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Applicant is to provide detailed hydraulic flow and design calculations for the proposed domestic and fire water services for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit or commencing land disturbance activities. g. Applicant is to coordinate with the City to obtain access to the valve at Beaver Street in order to evaluate its condition and to determine if it will need to be replaced prior to obtaining a building permit for the residential or commercial buildings. Applicant shall coordinate this inspection with the City Engineer. h. Applicant is to add the MDC traps to the operation and maintenance plan, schedule and log form. The operation and maintenance plan should include at a minimum the frequency of inspections, cleaning and pumping. i. Applicant will be responsible for replacing the sewer service if it proves to be in unsatisfactory condition. Applicant shall be responsible to coordinate the inspection of the existing sewer lines with the City Engineer. J. Applicant shall inspect and repair as necessary the 12-inch drainage pipe from Harmony Grove Road to the North River Canal that is located on the 1 Harmony Grove Road parcel. The work is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. If a different size pipe or other repair is needed, the applicant shall be responsible for the work. 10. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 11. Office of the Building Commissioner All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Commissioner. 12. Conservation Commission All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Conservation Commission. 13. Utilities a. Utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. The applicant shall have an engineer certify the utility plans for review by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. b. All electrical utilities for the site shall be underground. 15. HVAC a. The HVAC equipment located on the building roofs shall be visually screened by parapets, as shown on the submitted plans. b. HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further mitigate noise emanating from the HVAC units(s) if the Board of Health receives any complaints. 16. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. "Refuse removal" includes recycling, which shall be the responsibility of the owner, his successors or assigns. The owner shall provide adequate facilities to ensure all users are able to recycle their trash. Owner is to enter into a contract with a company of the owner's 7 choice to arrange pick-up of recyclable material. A copy of this contract is to be submitted to the City Engineer. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. 17. As-built Plans a. As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. b. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy; as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. 18. Violations Violations of any condition contained herein shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 19. Affordable Housing The Petitioner shall place an Affordable Housing Restriction on the development ensuring that at least fourteen (14) of the one hundred and forty-one (141) units shall be affordable. The form of the restriction is to be approved by the City Planner and recorded with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. The affordable housing restriction is to be in accordance with the eligibility criteria for the Commonwealth Department of Housing and Community Development's Subsidized Housing Inventory for the purpose of ensuring that at least fourteen (14) dwelling units will be restricted as affordable housing for households whose annual incomes are eighty percent (80%) or less of area median income with rents affordable to low and moderate income households, by standards established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for a period of ninety-nine (99) years from the date of the first occupancy permit. 20. Special Conditions: a. The parcel located at 1 Harmony Grove Road, if developed in the future, is to be developed for a commercial use. Such future development shall be considered an amendment to the Planned Unit Development and is subject to Planning Board review and approval. b. The Planning Board encourages commercial development on the property in the future. The Planning Board will require only 172 spaces on the site to be dedicated to residential use. The remaining 43 spaces may be dedicated to commercial use in the future. c. Applicant is to submit revised plans to the Planning Board demonstrating that the parcels identified as 5 Harmony Grove Road and 1 Harmony Grove Road are included in the overall Planned Unit Development site, prior to issuance of a building permit for the residential buildings. The inclusion of these parcels helps ensure that the overall residential uses and associated improvements do not exceed 50% of the land area comprising the PUD site. 8 d. Applicant is to provide an easement running to the City for a multi-use path on the parcel located at 5 Harmony Grove Road. The easement is to be recorded at the Registry of Deeds prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. e. Applicant is to provide an easement running to the City of Salem for public access and recreational use of the multi-use path shown on the site plans. This easement is to extend the entire length and width of the multi-use path, as well as the areas between the path and the Canal, and the path and five feet from the front of Buildings 2 and 3 (not including any area shown as residential land area on the site plan). The easement is to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and recorded at the Registry of Deeds prior to issuance of a building permit for the residential buildings shown on the Plan. f. Elevation drawings showing renovation of the existing commercial building on 60 Grove Street, along with a description of the proposed use, are to be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit for 60 Grove Street. g. Traffic Mitigation: ➢ The applicant agrees to donate $100,000 to the City of Salem for traffic improvements in the area in and around Harmony Grove Road, Mason Street, Grove Street, Boston Street, Bridge Street and Goodhue Street for traffic mitigation prior to the issuance of a building permit for any of the new residential buildings shown on the Plan. ➢ Subject to all necessary permitting and approvals from the City of Salem, the applicant is to make the following improvements, as described in the submitted Traffic Impact and Access Study, Proposed Legacy Apartments at Harmony Grove, Salem, MA, prepared by Vanasse &Associates, Inc., dated December 2011: ❖ Sidewalks are to be upgraded to the City's standard concrete sidewalks along the frontages of 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 and 64 Grove Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. Any existing bituminous concrete sidewalks along 1 and 5 Harmony Grove Road are to be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. ❖ Existing signage and markings at the Grove Street railroad crossing are to be updated to comply with current standards of the US Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), as amended, prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. ❖ At the intersection of Grove Street, Beaver Street and Goodhue Street: i. Provide pavement markings to delineate travel lanes ii. Install stop signs on the Grove Street northbound approach at Goodhue Street, the Beaver Street westbound approach at Grove Street and the Beaver Street eastbound approach at Goodhue Street iii. Provide appropriate signage to enforce one-way traffic flow on Goodhue Street ❖ At the intersection of Grove Street at Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street: i. Install a stop sign at the Grove Street northbound right-turn movement ii. Upgrade signs and pavement markings at the intersection ❖ During months when vegetation is in leaf, as indicated in the submitted Traffic Impact and Access Study, vegetation must be kept trimmed back to ensure adequate driveway sight lines and sight triangles for vehicles exiting the site. 9 I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Charles M. Puleo, Chair 10 . CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Decision 1, 3 & 5 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Map 16, Lots 236, 237 239, 377 & 378 October 23, 2012 n ZZ MRM Project Management, LLCrn� N P.O. Box 388 m Beverly, MA 01915 a 3 RE: Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood HazarbDistrYSpecial Permit Decision for Legacy Park at Harmony Grove Apartments On February 2, 2012, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing under Section 7.3, Planned Unit Development, Section 9.5, Site Plan Review, and Section 8.1, Flood Hazard Overlay District (FHOD), of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, at the request of MRM Project Management, LLC, for the properties located at 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street, (Map 16, Lots 236, 237 and 239). The proposed project includes construction of three multi-family residential buildings (total of 141 units), re-use of an existing 17,000 square foot commercial office building, associated parking and landscaping, and a bicycle path providing public access to the North River Canal. The Public Hearing was continued to February 16, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), March 1, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), March 15, 2012, April 5, 2012, April 19, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), May 3, 2012, May 17, 2012, June 7, 2012, June 21 (but was not heard on that date),July 5, 2012, July 19, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), September 6, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), September 11, 2012, September 20, 2012 (but was not heard on that date), October 1, 2012, and October 18, 2012. At the hearing on October 1, 2012,the applicant presented a plan showing the addition of two adjacent parcels to the Planned Unit Development, 1 and 5 Harmony Grove Road (Map 16, Lots 377 and 378). The continued public hearing on October 18, 2012 and revised project with additional parcels was properly re-advertised and additional abutters notified. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, .SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 •TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 ♦ WWW.SALEM.COM The Planning Board, after numerous public hearings and review of submitted materials and testimony, hereby finds that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 7.3 Planned Unit Development, as follows: 1) 7.3.1 Purpose—The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD), which incorporates a mix of housing, commercial space and open space, meets the purpose of Planned Unit Development, Section 7.3, to ensure compliance with the Master Plan of the City of Salem, Neighborhood Master Plan of the North River Canal Corridor, and good zoning practice. The proposed Planned Unit Development will promote the purpose of Section 7.3 by redeveloping a contaminated, blighted brownfield site and bringing it into productive reuse. The 1996 Master Plan emphasizes the presence of vacant industrial properties as one of the most important land use issue facing the City of Salem (City of Salem Master Plan Update and Action Plan, 1996, page 23), and highlights the difficulty of redeveloping these properties, particularly those with environmental contamination. While the property is not within the NRCC neighborhood or zoning district, it is adjacent to it, and shares many of the characteristics of the former industrial parcels in the NRCC. The Neighborhood Master Plan for the North River Canal Corridor(2003) promotes constructing a waterfront pathway along the banks of the North River (Section 2.8), providing waterfront access along the canal, unlocking redevelopment north of Bridge Street, and improving the image of the canal edges (Section 3.3). Further, the mixture of uses in the planned unit development is determined to be sufficiently advantageous to render it appropriate to depart from the normal requirements of the districts. The mixture of residential, commercial and open space/recreational uses proposed is appropriate, and the departure from strict provisions of zoning classifications, specifically residential use in the Business Park Development zoning district, is justified by the cleanup of the formerly contaminated and dangerous property, rehabilitation of a blighted site, location of new housing near the Salem MBTA commuter rail station, and construction of a multi-use path along the canal that continues the walking and biking trail system proposed for the North River Canal Corridor in its neighborhood master plan and in other NRCC development projects. The Planned Unit Development would not result in a net negative environmental impact. The project requires remediation of a property contaminated from its former industrial use. The cleanup of the site, introduction of controlled drainage infrastructure, and erosion prevention measures will result in improvements to the natural environment on the site and surrounding it, including the water quality in the North River Canal. 2) 7.3.2 Applicability—The proposed PUD meets the minimum size requirement of 60,000 square feet; the development parcels total 362,000 square feet. The underlying zoning districts of the proposed development parcels are largely Business Park Development, with a small portion of Industrial; both are eligible zoning districts for PUD treatment. A portion of 64 Grove Street, which is mostly zoned Business Park Development, is zoned Residential Two-Family, which does not allow PUD. However, the PUD development does not extend more than 30 feet into this more restrictive zoning district, and so is allowable under the Salem Zoning Ordinance (Section 2.4, Lot Split by Boundary Line). 2 3) 7.3.3 Uses—All proposed uses, including residential multi-family and commercial, are allowed in a PUD development. ➢ 7.3.3.2 —A commercial use (office space) is proposed within the PUD project site. However, it is not directly adjacent to a residential zoning district. ➢ 7.3.3.3— In the Business Park Development district, residential uses and associated improvements cannot exceed 50% of the land area of the parcel. The residential development, including associated improvements such as driveways, parking and landscaping, comprise less than 50%of the total land area of the project site. 4) 7.3.4 Dimensional Requirements: ➢ 7.3.4.1. Bulk, yards, parking and loading needs were evaluated by the Planning Board and found to be adequate. ➢ 7.3.4.2. No individual house lots are proposed. The Planning Board finds the amount of frontage provided on the project site to be adequate and appropriate to the surrounding neighborhood. ➢ 7.3.4.3. No individual house lots are proposed. The Planning Board finds the amount of usable and accessible open area within the total development is adequate. ➢ 7.3.4.4. No proposed residential building on the site exceeds four (4) stories, as determined by the Salem Building Commissioner/Zoning Officer. 5) 7.3.5 Open Space—the applicant/project owner will provide an easement along the proposed bicycle path and directly adjacent areas to allow for public access and recreational use by residents of the City as a condition of this application (see Conditions, below). The Planning Board hereby makes the following findings pertaining to the Flood Hazard District Special Permit Application: 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located. 2. There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lot(s) caused by either overspill from waterbodies or high runoff. 3. Utilities, including gas, electricity, fuel, water and sewage disposal, shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, shortcircuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. At a (regularly scheduled) meeting of the Planning Board held on (date), the Planning Board voted by a vote of(number) (XXX) in favor (names), and (number) (XXX) opposed, to approve (deny) the Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, subject to the following conditions: 3 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform to the plans entitled, "Site Plan for Mixed-Use Development: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove, 60 & 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road, Salem, MA December 2011," prepared by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC, LeBlanc Survey Associates, Beauds Art, Inc., Sebego Technics, WLS Lighting Systems, for MRM Project Management, LLC, including pages N-1, C-1, C-2, C-3A-C, C-SA-C, C-6, C-7, C-8, 1 of 1 (Landscaping Plan), 1 of 1 (Photometric Plan), A.1.1, A2.2, dated December 2011 and last revised June 20, 2012; page A2.1, last dated July 2, 2012; C-4A-C and C-8, last dated September 10, 2012, and pages C-3 and C-9, last dated October 1, 2012. 2.. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed to be a significant change by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 3. Project Delays The developer, his successors or assigns shall notify the Department of Planning and Community Development if work on the site ceases for any reason for a period of six (6) months. In this event, the applicant shall be required to appear before the Planning Board and report to the Board the reason(s) why work has ceased at the project and a schedule of when work will begin again at the site, as well as a date of final project completion. If substantial work has not commenced on the site, as deemed by the Board, and such work is not anticipated to begin within two (2) years of the date of the Planning Board's original decision, the applicant shall notify the Board and, prior to the two-year anniversary of the issuance of the permit, shall request an extension of the permit from the Board. Applicant shall provide in such request any and all materials the Board may require to make a determination on the extension request, including but not limited to: studies, reports or new plans, at the applicant's expense, as requested by the Board and deemed necessary by the City Planner. 4. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two- (2) year period. c. Any street trees removed as a result of construction shall be replaced. The location of the trees shall be approved by the City Planner prior to replanting. d. Final completed landscaping shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. S. Signage 4 All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner in accordance with the City of Salem sign ordinance prior to the issuance of a sign permit. Approval of the site plans does not represent approval of proposed signage. 6. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the residential buildings. c. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22; Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. b. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling, blasting or rock hammering on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. c. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of demolition and construction of the project. d. All construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site, must be located completely on the site. g. All sidewalks, roadways, utilities, landscaping, etc. damaged during construction shall be replaced or repaired to their pre-construction condition, or better. h. A construction traffic/phasing management Ian and schedule shall be submitted to the p g g P Department of Planning& Community Development and Police Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. Health Department and Board of Health All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Health Department and Board of Health, including but not limited to the following: 5 a. The units must comply with all the requirements of Chapter II of the State Sanitary code: 105CMR410 including but not limited to: ➢ Screens for windows ➢ Adequate trash disposal facilities ➢ Adequate ventilation ➢ Provide heating during the heating season at the required temperatures b. Provide a mosquito to control plan for the catch basins. c. All units that are rented must be granted a certificate of fitness by the Board of Health prior to occupancy. A copy must be provided to the renter. d. If the units are sub-metered, then the owner must fill sub-metering affidavit for each individual unit prior to renting unit. If the affidavit is not filed, tenant cannot be charged for water. e. Applicant must submit a trash disposal plan to ensure there is adequate capacity for storage of trash onsite, including contingencies to address tenant changeovers and other high trash disposal events. f. Building owner is required to ensure that adequate contingencies are in place to address pest control/remediation. Specifically: ➢ A pest control survey is to be done prior to commencement of construction. ➢ There is to be a pre-baiting program in place. ➢ There is to be an ongoing pest monitoring program and a program to respond to complaints from abutters. ➢ Applicant is to submit a written description of the program and ongoing results of pest control site visits has to be available for inspection. ➢ Reports must include any rodent activity and actions taken. The locations should be mapped and activity identified by location of stations. 9. Office of the City Engineer The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following: a. Applicant is to provide a completed NOI and SWPPP to the Planning Department prior to any land disturbance, and in any event, prior to issuance of a building permit. b. Applicant is to provide a completed and signed Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement to the Planning Department prior to obtaining a building permit. c. Applicant is to provide detailed design plans stamped by a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer for the proposed retaining walls for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit. d. Applicant is to provide a step-backwater analysis for the 10-, 50- and 100-year flood events for both existing and proposed conditions to demonstrate the adequacy of the hydraulic opening, structure depth and profile of the access road, for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit for the residential buildings or the bridges. e. Applicant is to provide a detailed structural, geotechnical and hydraulic design for the bridges for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit for the residential buildings or vehicular bridge. Applicant is to provide a detailed 6 structural, geotechnical and hydraulic design for the pedestrian bridge for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Applicant is to provide detailed hydraulic flow and design calculations for the proposed domestic and fire water services for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit or commencing land disturbance activities. g. Applicant is to coordinate with the City to obtain access to the valve at Beaver Street in order to evaluate its condition and to determine if it will need to be replaced prior to obtaining a building permit for the residential or commercial buildings. Applicant shall coordinate this inspection with the City Engineer. h. Applicant is to add the MDC traps to the operation and maintenance plan, schedule and log form. The operation and maintenance plan should include at a minimum the frequency of inspections, cleaning and pumping. i. Applicant will be responsible for replacing the sewer service if it proves to be in unsatisfactory condition. Applicant shall be responsible to coordinate the inspection of the existing sewer lines with the City Engineer. j. Applicant shall inspect and repair as necessary the 12-inch drainage pipe from Harmony Grove Road to the North River Canal that is located on the 1 Harmony Grove Road parcel. The work is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. If a different size pipe or other repair is needed, the applicant shall be responsible for the work. 30. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 11. Office of the Building Commissioner All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Commissioner. 12. Conservation Commission All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Conservation Commission. 13. Utilities a. Utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. The applicant shall have an engineer certify the utility plans for review by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. b. All electrical utilities for the site shall be underground. 15. HVAC a. The HVAC equipment located on the building roofs shall be visually screened by parapets, as shown on the submitted plans. b. HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further mitigate noise emanating from the HVAC units(s) if the Board of Health receives any complaints. 16. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. "Refuse removal" includes recycling, which shall be the responsibility of the owner, his successors or assigns. The owner shall provide adequate facilities to ensure all users are able to recycle their trash. Owner is to enter into a contract with a company of the owner's 7 choice to arrange pick-up of recyclable material. A copy of this contract is to be submitted to the City Engineer. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. 17. As-built Plans a. As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. b. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy; as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. 18. Violations Violations of any condition contained herein shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 19. Affordable Housing The Petitioner shall place an Affordable Housing Restriction on the development ensuring that at least fourteen (14) of the one hundred and forty-one (141) units shall be affordable. The form of the restriction is to be approved by the City Planner and recorded with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. The affordable housing restriction is to be in accordance with the eligibility criteria for the Commonwealth Department of Housing and Community Development's Subsidized Housing Inventory for the purpose of ensuring that at least fourteen (14) dwelling units will be restricted as affordable housing for households whose annual incomes are eighty percent (80%) or less of area median income with rents affordable to low and moderate income households, by standards established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for a period of ninety-nine (99) years from the date of the first occupancy permit. 20. Special Conditions: a. The parcel located at 1 Harmony Grove Road, if developed in the future, is to be developed for a commercial use. Such future development shall be considered an amendment to the Planned Unit Development and is subject to Planning Board review and approval. P 1 g PP b. The Planning Board encourages commercial development on the property in the future. The Planning Board will require only 172 spaces on the site to be dedicated to residential use. The remaining 43 spaces may be dedicated to commercial use in the future. c. Applicant is to submit revised plans to the Planning Board demonstrating that the parcels identified as 5 Harmony Grove Road and 1 Harmony Grove Road are included in the overall Planned Unit Development site, prior to issuance of a building permit for the residential buildings. The inclusion of these parcels helps ensure that the overall residential uses and associated improvements do not exceed 50% of the land area comprising the PUD site. 8 d. Applicant is to provide an easement running to the City for a multi-use path on the parcel located at 5 Harmony Grove Road. The easement is to be recorded at the Registry of Deeds prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. e. Applicant is to provide an easement running to the City of Salem for public access and recreational use of the multi-use path shown on the site plans. This easement is to extend the entire length and width of the multi-use path, as well as the areas between the path and the Canal, and the path and five feet from the front of Buildings 2 and 3 (not including any area shown as residential land area on the site plan). The easement is to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and recorded at the Registry of Deeds prior to issuance of a building permit for the residential buildings shown on the Plan. f. Elevation drawings showing renovation of the existing commercial building on 60 Grove Street, along with a description of the proposed use, are to be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit for 60 Grove Street. g. Traffic Mitigation: ➢ The applicant agrees to donate $100,000 to the City of Salem for traffic improvements in the area in and around Harmony Grove Road, Mason Street, Grove Street, Boston Street, Bridge Street and Goodhue Street for traffic mitigation prior to the issuance of a building permit for any of the new residential buildings shown on the Plan. ➢ Subject to all necessary permitting and approvals from the City of Salem,the applicant is to make the following improvements, as described in the submitted Traffic Impact and Access Study, Proposed Legacy Apartments at Harmony Grove, Salem, MA, prepared by Vanasse &Associates, Inc., dated December 2011: ❖ Sidewalks are to be upgraded to the City's standard concrete sidewalks along the frontages of 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 and 64 Grove Street,to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. Any existing bituminous concrete sidewalks along 1 and 5 Harmony Grove Road are to be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. ❖ Existing signage and markings at the Grove Street railroad crossing are to be updated to comply with current standards of the US Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), as amended, prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. ❖ At the intersection of Grove Street, Beaver Street and Goodhue Street: i. Provideavement markings to delineate travel lanes p g ii. Install stop signs on the Grove Street northbound approach at Goodhue Street, the Beaver Street westbound approach at Grove Street and the Beaver Street eastbound approach at Goodhue Street iii. Provide appropriate signage to enforce one-way traffic flow on Goodhue Street v At the intersection of Grove Street at Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street: i. Install a stop sign at the Grove Street northbound right-turn movement ii. Upgrade signs and pavement markings at the intersection ❖ During months when vegetation is in leaf, as indicated in the submitted Traffic Impact and Access Study, vegetation must be kept trimmed back to ensure adequate driveway sight lines and sight triangles for vehicles exiting the site. 9 I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Charles M. Puleo, Chair 10 1, 3,5 tl�2naov�� C�2�-e Vk�l '� Itv4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 231). (For a City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio Of a missed meeting and examining all evidence.) Per the City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39 Section 23D, I, �on G �, , hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have examined all evidence pertaining to L eA .c g laejalwhich was distributed at the single missed session on 2j2. ))2 which evidence included an audio recording of the missed session. This certification was submitted prior to the undersigned's participation in a vote on the matter and shall become part of the record of the hearing. Name t" P . 1.�_ G 4,-13c Date Board or Commission AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 231). (For a City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio Of a missed meeting and examining all evidence) Per he City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39 Section 23D, 11 tG" 6 fJcs , hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have examined all evidence pertaining to 1,4 aT a,IC IN 0 f6jZ.A- &,&which was distributed at the single missed session on -1-167112- which evidence included an audio recording of the missed session. This certification was submitted prior to the undersigned's participation in a vote on the matter and shall become part of the record of the hearing. Name Date �j Board or Commission rLG 0 0 t vV-1 �20av-1 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 23D. (A City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio Q/'(1 missed meeting and examining all evidence.) Per the City of Salem provision M.C.L., Chapter 39 Section 23D, I, G ac MC 6..0 hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have examined all evidence pertaining to/4th Pr63acr <r. ti-GSA4 c,'t. which was distributed at the single missed session on .,n qr A /Sr xv/z, d which evidence included an audio recording of the missed session. This certification shall become part of the record of the hearing. Name /J wi�/ Date mn OF �- '��. �� A�� 7� � AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 23D. (A City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio of a missed meeting and examining all evidence) Per the City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39 Section 23D, I,&& //f P! AOC/k6/4fi/ereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have examined all evidence pertaining to'(ee--Z44:?Ae fKA46< 4241 ich was distributed at the single missed session on A)q f4 which evidence included an audio recording of the missed session. This certification shall become part of the record of the hearing. Nacfe F.,.l Date 281 �— AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 23D. (A City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio of u missed nneeting and examining all evidence.) Per the City of Salem rovision M.G.L., Chapter 39 Section 23D, , hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have examined all evidence pertaining to hich was distributed at the single missed session onc�—z3— o 1 which evidence included an audio recording of the missed session. This certification shall become part of the record of the hearing. N e. C/ Z Date !� AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39, Section 23D. (A City Councilor, board, or commission member, to sign upon listening to the audio of a missed meeting and examining all evidence.) Per the City of Salem provision M.G.L., Chapter 39 Section 23D, I, L pw is F7e IMgv hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have examined all evidence pertaining to 4iL I-e +c4 R• kU 5) rV ono�c�� which was distributed at the single missed session on eMi Z o V'1L ,which evidence included an audio recording of the missed session. This certification shall become part of the record of the hearing. Name Date ft 2012 Page I of 1 Danielle McKnight From: Danielle McKnight Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:17 AM To: 'Joseph Correnti' Subject: Planning Board member attendance for Legacy Park Joe, Here's what my records show: Tim Ready: missed 4/5, listened to audio, submitted Mullins affidavit George McCabe: missed 3/15, sent audio, still need affidavit Chuck Puleo: missed 3/15, listened to audio, submitted Mullins affidavit Randy Clarke: missed 2/2, sent audio, still need affidavit Mark George: present at all meetings Tim Kavanagh: present at all meetings Lewis Beilman: missed 5/17, listened to audio, submitted Mullins affidavit Helen Sides: missed 7/5, sent audio, still need affidavit John Moustakis: not eligible Danielle McKnight Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, Third Floor Salem, MA 01970 (978) 619-5685 dmcknight salem.com 8/30/2012 Page 1 of 1 Danielle McKnight From: Danielle McKnight Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:12 PM To: 'Chuck Puleo (E-mail)'; George McCabe; 'Helen Sides', 'John Moustakis 0moustakis@verizon.net)'; Lewis Beilman; Mark George (marigotassoc@comcast.net); Randy Clarke (clarkerandy@gmail.com); 'Tim Ready (E-mail)' Attachments: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE-Mullins-4-2007.doc Hi everyone, Just to ensure everyone stays eligible to vote on the Legacy Park project when the time comes, I want to make sure everyone is current on listening to the audio for any missed meetings (you should also read the minutes for any meeting you missed). A few of you have already given me Mullins affidavits for missed meetings. This is what I have in my records— please let me know if anything is incorrect. Also, if you need to get me an affidavit, I'm attaching a blank one. Thanks! /Tim Ready: missed 4/5, need affidavit kk ]George McCabe: missed 3/15, need affidavit ✓Chuck Puleo: missed 3/15, listened to audio, has submitted Mullins affidavit ?Randy Clarke: missed 2/2, need affidavit .,'Mark George: te-rr �, present at all meetings ✓Tim Kavanagh: present at all meetings ✓Lewis Beilman: missed 5/17, listened to audio, has submitted Mullins affidavit --XHelenSides: en a a K:suvl �IrliZ_ � A John Moustakis: not eligible Danielle McKnight Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, Third Floor Salem, MA 01970 (978) 619-5685 dmcknightt7a salem.com 7/5/2012 � Peer Review I O -arta Se & SSac ae C. 10 New England Business Center Drive Transportation Engineers & Planners Suite 314 1A1 Andover, MA 01810-1066 Office 978-474-8800 Fax 978-688-6508 Ref: 5977 July 5,2012 Mr. Robert H. Griffin, P.E. Griffin Engineering Group,LLC 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G P.O. Box 7061 Beverly, MA 01915 Re: Proposed Legacy Apartments at Harmony Grove Salem, Massachusetts Dear Bob: Vanasse & Associates (VAI) has reviewed the latest site plan, revised June 20, 2012, which shifts the Grove Street driveway approximately 7 feet south of the previous location, shown on the site plan dated December 20, 2011. This slight shift in the driveway location will not change the sight distance measurements as presented in the December 2011 Traffic Impact and Access Study and sight distance at this driveway will continue to be acceptable. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, VANASSE& ASSOCIATES,INC. F. Giles Ham, P.E. Principal FGI /las D PAY,SPOHORD& TI IORNDIKE f.NCiINEII�P-l^- 1;r,)m � I I ,C1 fir Bonino \I\U`liy ,{ l�" lulu ry iU��n;i,96b6 �n. EGq.72'.S.99N'i xwc.fsl inc.com April 12, 2012 City of Salem Planning Board c/o Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street,Third Floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject:Traffic Impact Peer Review—Proposed Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Dear Members of the Board: As requested, Fay, Spofford &Thorndike is submitting this letter to summarize our peer review findings pertaining to the traffic impact of the proposed Legacy Park Apartments redevelopment at Harmony Grove Road. In connection with this peer review,the following information has been reviewed: • Traffic Impact and Access Study, Proposed Legacy Apartments at Harmony Grove, Salem, MA, Vanasse&Associates, Inc., (referred to as the 'TIAS') December 2011 • City of Salem Planning Board December 2011 Application forms signed by the Applicant and Owner including: - City of Salem Application for Planned Unit Development Special Permit—&60-64 Grove Street - City of Salem Application Site Plan Review - Project Narrative in Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications for Legacy Apartments at 60-64 Grove Street& 3 Harmony Grove Road • Site Plan for Mixed-Use Development—Legacy Apartments at 60-64 Grove Street &3 Harmony Grove Road, December 2011,Griffin Engineering Group, LLC (referred to as the 'Site Plans') Additionally, the peer reviewer conducted a site visit on Wednesday February 15, 2012 during the PM peak period. During the site visit, existing conditions and traffic operations in the site vicinity and at the analyzed study area network intersections were observed. Also observed were the available sight lines at the proposed site driveway locations associated with the Site Plans. The TIAS indicates that at full build-out, the former Salem Oil &Grease site will include 141 apartment units plus 15,000 square feet (sf) of office space developed from an existing 17,000 sf building to be refurbished. The site plans indicates that four two-way access driveways will serve the site at or within existing curb cuts. A continuous driveway between Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road will serve (Rested Partners Ior 17c4i9n 5olutinns FAY,S1,01TO2D&TKORNDIKG City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 2 of 12 the site apartments. The future cross-site driveway will include a new on-site bridge with a sidewalk on the east side replacing an existing n , , fi'•-? �� ' narrow wood/metal bridge(see right). The residential cross-site driveway will also include a new at-grade railroad crossing of a low volume/low speed freight rail track via an existing � railroad crossing easement. !IS The southernmost of the three site-related Grove Street driveways will serve the residential component of the site. The two northern Grove Y Street driveways will serve the office component of the site. The southern office driveway serves 13 Looking south from Harmony Grove Road tenant spaces while for tenants while the northern Existing bridge to be replaced with a 24- office driveway serves 11 tenant spaces plus the site loading dock located in the same area as the foot bridge and 5-foot sidewalk existing building loading dock. immediately to the west as part of a residential access driveway between Grove FST's traffic impacts peer review is guided by Street and Harmony Grove Road Sections 6.7.5 and 9.5.6 of the City of Salem's Zoning Ordinance adopted September 10, 2009, as amended. 1. (6.7.5 Traffic Impact Study) "A detailed traffic impact analysis in accordance with professional engineering standards is required for any special permit or site plan approval... A registered professional engineer experienced and qualified in traffic engineering shall prepare the traffic impact study. 2. A proposed mitigation plan must be included: A plan (with supporting text) to minimize traffic and safety impacts through such means as physical design and layout concepts, or other appropriate means; and an interior traffic and pedestrian circulation plan designed to minimize conflicts and safety problems. Measures shall be proposed to achieve the following post development standards: All streets and intersections to be impacted by the project shall have the some level of service or better than predevelopment conditions. The SPGA must determine that the mitigation is satisfactory." "(9.5.6 Review Criteria) The Planning Board shall review and amend all such submitted plans in accordance with the following criteria (note: only traffic circulation review criteria is presented below): 1. Adequacy of parking facilities and number of parking spaces proposed for each development; d FAY,SPOPPOR D&r TI{0RN D t KE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 3 of 12 2. Adequacy of loading facilities, 3. Adequacy of traffic circulation system; 4. Adequacy of access points and routes to and from the land parcel to adjoining streets and ways,and.... 11. Adequacy of pedestrian circulation systems to and from parking areas and structures;" ,PEER REVIEW FINDINGS STUDY AREA ADEQUACY The study area selected for intersections for analysis in the TIAS included: • Mason and Grove Streets at Harmony Grove Road (unsignalized) • Grove at Goodhue Streets (unsignalized) • Beaver at Grove Streets(unsignalized) • Grove at Boston and Nichols Streets(offset signalized intersection) We conclude the study area analyzed is adequate for addressing the site's primary traffic impacts in accordance with standard industry and City of Salem requirements. FST's NRCC Transportation Study did apply traffic generated by the Legacy Park development and documented in the TIAS, as discussed below,to a larger traffic network that was expected to have traffic generated by the five NRCC developments in aggregate. Therefore,traffic generated by the Legacy Park site was added to intersections like Boston Street at Bridge Street, Flint at Mason Streets, Flint at Bridge Streets, Mason at Tremont Streets, and Boston at Aborn Streets along with the projected traffic from the other four NRCC redevelopment sites. TRIP GENERATION AND TRIP DISTRIBUTION ASSUMPTIONS Consistent with the ITE Trip Generation report (81h Edition, 2008)the Legacy Park Apartments TIAS indicates the development at full build out will generate approximately 1,144 vehicle trips on a daily basis or 572 trips in and 572 trips out. It projects that 96 trips will be generated during a typical AM peak hour. Of these, 61 will be in the outbound direction and 35 will be in the inbound direction. During the afternoon PM peak hour, the TIAS expects the site to generate approximately 117 vehicle trips,of which 66 will be in the inbound direction while 51 will be in the off-peak outbound direction. The TIAS trip generation analysis as presented is acceptable. We note there is a minor difference between the Application and the TIAS in that the Development Application indicates the existing office space from 117,000 square feet(sf)will be reoccupied, while the TIAS indicates it will be reduced to 15,000 sf. If the future office space remains as existing(i.e.,`17,000 sf), the TIAS estimates of future trips pertaining to the office component of the Legacy site based on 115,000 sf are slightly understated. However, the difference of 2,000 sf is relatively small and does not significantly affect the analysis FAY,SPOFFORD& RORNEAKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 4 of 12 findings, as the trip generation differences amount to fewer than 5 vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hours and fewer than 40 vehicle trips on a 24-hour basis. The projected trip distribution pattern of the site-generated trips was based on the year 2000 Journey to Work Census Data.This methodology is acceptable, as the year 2010 Journey to Work Census data is not yet available and the distribution pattern is consistent with observations of traffic in the area. ASSUMED NO-BUILD/BUILD PROJECTIONS Ithree-phaseanal sis to The approach to No-Build/Build projections cited in the TIAS uses the traditions y estimate AM and PM peak hour traffic and is acceptable. Phase 1 involves adding a certain amount of unknown traffic growth to the 'background'. In this case, a 1% per year compounded annual growth rate was added, as it is representative of a stable low growth environment pertaining to the area. Phase 2 involves estimating AM and PM peak hour trips generated from a list of NRCC programmed developments. Programmed developments include trips generated by the Riverview Place located off Mason and Flint Streets, 28 Goodhue Street opposite the Legacy Park Apartments site,and the Gateway Center development east of Bridge Street and north of Boston Street. Trips from these three approved developments were added to the unknown 'background' traffic growth for the Legacy Park study area network by distributing the additional trips in accordance with published traffic impact reports or observed trip distribution patterns from traffic count data. Because the Fiynntan site did not have a specific development plan, its potential development was assumed to be included in the Phase I 'unknown background traffic' component of the analysis. Phase 3 involves identifying and accounting for any roadway system changes programmed in the area. At this time, no specific changes are programmed for public streets in the Study Area. The future Build Alternative adds estimated trips from the Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove to the adjacent roadway network distributes them in accordance with the anticipated driveway locations using the year 2000 Journey to Work census data, as noted above. We conclude that the above method used in the TIAS to project future No-Build and Build Legacy Park trips is acceptable. The methodology employed is consistent with industry standards and Salem requirements. FUTURE INTERSECTION AND DRIVEWAY OPERATIONS The TIAS approach/methodology used to analyze future intersection and driveway conditions is consistent with industry standards and.is acceptable. The latest accepted methodology is employed to perform analysis and Synchro 7 is approved for use by MassDOT. During the initial public hearing, there was much concern raised about the driveway operations at the intersection of Harmony Grove Road and the future site driveway. The analysis indicates that the J FAY,SPOFFORD&x THORNDI KE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 5 of 12 intersection should operate acceptably. Based on observed peak hour operations in the area,we concur with the analysis findings. The analysis does indicate that by 2016,the intersections of Harmony Grove Road at Mason and Grove Streets will experience operational problems during the PM peak period. DRIVEWAY SIGHT LINES Filil Cj n `'7 Looking west on Harmony Grove Road east Looking east on Harmony Grove Road east of future residential driveway of future residential driveway Looking south on Grove Street near Looking north on Grove Street near future office use driveways future office use driveways m i j s Looking south on Grove Street to Goodhue Looking north on Grove Street near future Street near future site residential driveway site residential use driveway r FAY,SPOFFORD&THORNDI KE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 6 of 12 The analysis of driveway sight lines for the residential driveways contained in the TIAS is consistent with site observations performed on February 15, 2012 (see photos on the previous page). The TIAS addresses available stopping sight distance at three of the four driveways shown on the Site Plans. Site Plans generally call for modifying and re-using existing Salem Oil and Grease driveway curb cuts. Observations indicate that future driveway sight lines at all three Grove Street curb cuts exceed 200 feet and are acceptable, as are the sight lines for the future Harmony Grove Road Driveway, as long as hedge trimming is maintained to a height of 3.5' within the necessary sight triangles for each of the site driveways. During months when vegetation is in leaf,as indicated in the TIAS,vegetation must be kept trimmed back to ensure adequate driveway sight lines and sight triangles for vehicles exiting the site. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCOMMODATIONS The TIAS, under Recommendations,Transportation Demand Management Measures, recommends non-, specific pedestrian and bicycle accommodations be provided within the project. The Site Plans identify pedestrian accommodations(i.e.,ADA compliant sidewalks generally on the north side of the residential driveway and on one side of the residential driveway and six crosswalks). Additionally, ADA accessible sidewalks are not indicated on the re-occupied office building plan,so its ADA compliance cannot be verified at this time. The Site Plans do not indicate where or if bicycle storage facilities are proposed. Because the MBTA Salem Commuter Rail Station is a relatively short bike ride from the site,consistent with the TIAS,we recommend the Applicant encourage bike use on the site along with walking to and from the Salem Station, recognizing that bikes can travel to and from the Station within approximately 7 minutes, while walking approximately 20 minutes. This will.help reduce auto demands to and from the site. EXISTING AND FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND QUEUING ASSESSMENTS The TIAS provides tables summarizing existing and future projected levels of service that were analyzed in accordance with industry standards. Queuing assessments for the two-way stop controlled intersections are provided in the TIAS Technical Appendix.The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) does not include a methodology for estimating queues at all-way stops, such as that at the intersection of Harmony Grove Road at Grove and Mason Streets.' The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual,Transportation Research Board,2010,soon to be adopted by MassDOT for traffic analyses,includes an equation that can be used to calculate 95`h percentile queues at all-way stop intersections. FAY,SPUFFORD&THORNDIKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 7 of 12 PARKING FACILITIES AND PEAK PARKING DEMANDS The Legacy Park Apartments site proposes a total of 215 spaces for the residential component of the development and 24 spaces for the commercial component of the development for a site total of 239 parking spaces. The ITE Parking Generation report(4`h Edition, 2010) indicates that during peak parking demand periods, usually from 12 midnight to 5 AM,the residential parking supply should be more than adequate to accommodate peak demands from the proposed 141 apartment units. On average,during the late night hours, peak parking demands of the apartment component of the site should be approximately 173 spaces, with a 95%confidence level of approximately 193 spaces. On the other hand,the office component supply is proposed at 14 spaces,which is less than the ITE average parking demand for office uses is 2.84 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or 43 spaces for 15,000 sf and 49 spaces for 17,000 square feet. However, both ITE Parking Generation (4th Edition, 2010)and ULI Shared Parking (2"" Edition,2005) data would suggest that weekday mid-day apartment parking demands between the hours of 7 AM and 7 PM are likely to be no more than 75%of the daily peak,at late night Therefore, mid-day peak shared parking demands of the apartments should be approximately 130 spaces,with the 95%confidence level of 145 spaces. The big picture is that during the 7 AM to 7 PM period,consolidated peak mid-day parking demands of residential plus office users will be approximately 173 to 194 spaces. It is recommended that as a condition, the Applicant submit a shared parking agreement plan to be activated if and when the number of employees exceeds 24, as indicated on Site Plan C-3. TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation measures proposed in the TIAS include the following: • Grove, Beaver and Goodhue Streets intersection o Provide pavement markings to delineate lanes o Install a stop sign on the Grove Street northbound approach to Goodhue Street o Install a stop sign on the Beaver Street westbound approach to Grove Street o Install a stop sign on the Beaver Street eastbound approach to Grove Street o Add signs to help enforce one-way flow on Goodhue Street • Grove Street at Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street o Place northbound right turn movement from Grove Street to Mason Street under stop control rather than as a free right turn o Replace/upgrade intersection signs at and approaching the intersection • Site Access o Place stop signs at all two-way access driveways and have minimum 12-foot lanes for each driveway lane. FAY,SPOF't ORI)&THORNDNE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 8 of 12 • Transportation Demand Management Measures o Provide MBTA services information to residents o Provide on-site pedestrian and bicycle accommodations DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALKS MITIGATION Driveways on Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road across the entire site frontage should be have 'Inlaid' concrete sidewalks across them to clearly define the pedestrian space,with drivers yielding to pedestrians. Sidewalks generally should be upgraded to the City's standard concrete sidewalks along the site frontages on Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. The proposed Grove Street site driveway directly adjacent to the railroad corridor is constricted by the office-building footprint that juts out toward the railroad within 14 feet of the rail right of way. Even though the volume this driveway will be serving will be very low, its continuous 14-foot width is too narrow for two-way traffic plus pedestrians from the office building using the rear parking area going back and forth to their cars. Loading maneuvers at the existing loading area will be very constrained, as trucks serving the office building will need to back out onto Grove Street, as there is no area to turn around. We would recommend consideration of an alternate method for loading operations. It is recommended the Applicant consider consolidating the two driveways servicing the office area into one driveway. If doing so,the idea is to create a loading space offset from but parallel to the Grove Street sidewalk for the design truck vehicle (assumed to be typical SU-30 wheelbase vehicle)to arrive and depart. The assumption is that the existing loading dock would be accessed using portable dollies from the front to the rear of the building rather 1 than backing the truck out onto Grove Street across the Grove Street sidewalk. This will allow the Applicant to relocate the office driveway slightly to the north and reconfigure the front parking lot to retain the proposed number of parking spaces available for the office use. Thus, the narrow 14'constraint for the driveway connecting the two parking lots would be used a ca small number of autos from the rear parking area ! !9 and office-related pedestrians only. RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING MITIGATION ' The existing Grove Street at-grade railroad crossing and the proposed new on-site at-grade driveway railroad crossing within the study area were not discussed in the TIAS. While the rail Looking south to Grove Street Railroad Crossing service involves just one landowner in the City of Peabody,the TIAS should recommend appropriate traffic control devices in compliance with the current US Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD), as amended. MUTCD-compliant signs and markings are needed at the new on-site rail crossing. Itis recommended FAY,SP'OITORD&THOKINDIKH City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 9 of 12 that existing signage and markings at the Grove Street crossing(see right)should also be updated to comply with current standards. HARMONY GROVE ROAD AT GROVE AND MASON STREETS MITIGATION Because this intersection serves access to the main Legacy Park Apartments site entrance on Harmony Grove Road, it is important that its traffic operations remain acceptable. The TIAS indicates this intersection has a crash rate that exceeds the average MassDOT District 4 criteria for unsignalized intersections. To improve intersection safety, the TIAS calls for replacing signs and markings at the intersection and adding stop control to what is at present a free right turn movement northbound from Grove to Mason Street. The idea is to bring the signage and markings up to current MUTCD standards. With the Applicant's proposed mitigation,the overall level of service remains the same as with the No- Build, but the analysis indicates that the Build worsens delays at the intersection compared to the No- Build, particularly during the afternoon peak period. Ito i x An Potential Mini-roundabout at Harmony Grove Potential all-way stop T intersection at Harmony Road, Grove, and Mason Streets Grove Road, Grove, and Mason Streets From the illustration above, FST's NRCC Transportation Study,currently underway, is exploring the potential for replacing the four-way stop intersection with a three-way yield-controlled mini- roundabout, similar to the alternative recommended in the 2003 North River Canal Neighborhood Master Planning Study'or with a modified all-way stop"r intersection that might eventually be traffic signal controlled. As envisioned, it is anticipated that the mini-roundabout would require raised splitter islands on all three of its approaches to create deflection. The southbound approach on Grove Street would retain stop control, but re-oriented slightly to the west with an extension of the Mack Park landscape. It is anticipated that the center island will need to be fully mountable for use by the design vehicles and that truck U-turns would need to be prohibited. 2 North River Canal Corridor Master Planning Study,Goody Clancy with EarthTech,2003. FAY,SPOFFORD Fa THORND(KE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 10 of 12 Also shown above is a conceptual illustration of a potential all-way stop'T' intersection alternative to the mini-roundabout. The T alternative concept would have a 3-way all-way stop,with an off-set stop for the southbound Grove Street approach. As illustrated on the previous page,the offset T intersections would operate better than the existing 4-way stop,while addressing potential feasibility issues pertaining to the steep Grove Street grade approaching Mason Street as well as improving intersection safety features for all modes of travel including pedestrians and cyclists. The February 15`h site visit found that 4ffy✓n ,'° creation of a mini-roundabout will be very challenging,as the intersection has a steep Mason Street upgrade from the Grove Street northbound approach. Creation of a potential mini- Grove would require re-grading within Grove Street' ;' the context of observed grades approaching the intersection,especially for vehicles passing through from Harmony Grove Road to Mason Street direction. While the feasibility of creating a mini-roundabout has not yet been fully confirmed, it appears that Harmony Grove looking west to Mason and, the dimensions of the public layout are Grove Streets at Harkin Squaref adequate to accommodate one, should resolution of vertical grades on Grove Street northbound approach be workable. It appears an 80'-90' inscribed circle consistent with the Federal Highway Administration's mini-roundabout design criteria as contained in FHWA-SA-10-007) is achievable. . We recommend the Applicant work with the Planning Board to mitigate the negative impact at the intersection of Harmony Grove Road, Grove,and Mason Streets in a manner consistent with the City's vision for the Grave Street corridor as cited In its 1003 NRCC Master Plan, and the ongoing NRCC Transportation Study. GROVE, GOODHUE,AND BEAVER STREETS INTERSECTION MITIGATION The 2003 NRCC Master Plan proposed construction of a roundabout at this wide open intersection that contains an informal, unmarked, neighborhood parking area. Observations indicate that the intersection often accommodates large truck rigs both in the parking area and adjacent to the outer edge of the Goodhue Street approach to Beaver Street. The TIAS recommends that the parking area be formalized and that signage be added to enforce the one-way end of Goodhue Street. FST's recent NRCC Transportation Planning Study is exploring two options for this intersection, either re- orienting it as a T intersection toward Beaver Street, or as proposed in the 2003 Master Plan, or converting it to a mini-roundabout(see concepts on the page that follows). FAY,SPOFFORD&THORNDIKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 11 of 12 K y p y Potential Mini-roundabout at Goodhue, Potential T intersection at Goodhue, Beaver, Beaver, and Grove Streets with Goodhue and Grove Streets with portion of Goodhue Street remaining one-way, as today Street two-way Either option would add a significant amount of landscaping to the area and either would create potential flood storage capability while creating a pedestrian and bicycle circulation environment far superior to existing observed conditions. While both the options for the Goodhue, Beaver,and Grove Streets intersection illustrated above may make sense from an urban design perspective,they are not required to mitigate traffic increases associated with the Legacy Park Apartments, as this intersection is not problematic from a traffic capacity analysis perspective using the City of Salem's guidelines orstandard traffic engineering practices. The Applicant proposes to clarify existing flow patterns at the intersection by adding new signage, markings, and some small channelization islands at the ends of the intersection parking area. From a traffic mitigation perspective, the measures proposed by the Applicant for Implementation at this intersection are acceptable as interim safety measures prior to construction of more significant urban design and traffic calming measures,such as those illustrated above. It is important to distinguish between necessary traffic mitigation measures and the vision for the Grove Street corridor between the Goodhue, Beaver, and Grove Streets and Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street intersection. This corridor is not only the focal point of Legacy Park development, but two other developments proposed in the NRCC Area--the 28 Goodhue Street development, and the Goodhue Street edge of the future Flynntan re-development site. As such, the City will need to partner with a wide array of stakeholders along Grove Street in order to implement the gamut of potential Grove Street infrastructure modifications that are more than typical 'traffic mitigation' measures. The broader Grove Street corridor vision has been outlined in FST's Preliminary Recommendations for the North FAY,SPOFFORO SY CHORM AKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 12 of 12 River Canal Corridor Transportation Study (3/29/12 presentation)that is currently under review and is posted on the City's website. Infrastructure changes well in excess of normal traffic mitigation measures are needed to transform the Goodhue/Grove Street corridor into one that serves all of its users well, including the provision of ADA accessible sidewalks, accommodations for bike users between the site and the META, etc. Transformation is needed to create a Grove Street corridor that serves the circulation needs of all of its neighbors in a manner that will achieve positive and sustainable long-term economic and quality of life expectations. The TIAS was generally well done. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this traffic impacts peer review on behalf of the City of Salem Planning Board and will be available to answer any questions that the Board may have on the peer review findings detailed above. We look forward to presenting the peer review findings cited above at an upcoming meeting. Very truly yours, Fay, Spofford &Thorndike By qacyelo�� Gary L. Hebert, PE, PTOE Vice President LG-410H GLH:gh VO E FAY,SPOFFORD fa RECEIVED THoRNDIKE ENG IN E ERS 5 Rurlington Woods a APR 25 2012 Rurlington,MA 01803 11 Toll Free.800.835.8666 �.- t`�•' �.� OF P IY`FT. LI,�' T:781.221.1000 NING& F:781.229.1115 1914 COS4413NiTY DEVELOPMCNT wwwfstinc.com Danielle McNight In Account With: City of Salem LG-410J Planning Department Invoice No. 1 120 Washington Street, 4th Floor April 20,2012 Salem, MA 01970 T.I.N.#04-3486454 RE: Traffic Impact Peer Review of Proposed Salem Oil and Grease Development at Grove and Harmony Grove Streets-Salem, Massachusetts PERIOD: Beginning through March 31 2012 During this period, FST staff reviewed the project site during the PM peak period. A peer review letter was prepared for submission. Staff Services; HOURS RATE AMOUNT Hebert, Gary L. Associate 30.0 $57.13 $1,713.90 30.0 $1,713.90 $1,713.90 x2.7 Total Staff Services: $4,627.53 FYnenQPC• None this Period $0.00 Total Expenses: $0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT D I THI INVOI - $41627.53 ,1 A' Very truly yours, FAY, SPOFFORD&THORNDIKE, LLC By - VSP . -_Dean L. Gr President Please remit your payment within 30 days, If you have any questions, please call Gary Hebert at 617-723-8882 x2224 or 617-274-1310. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment. ENGINEERS -_PLANNERS - ScIEN'r ISTS Trusted Pei,ma'for Design Sohuimu - ' FAY,SPQFF0ItD€n THOR.NDIKE e N e I wee R5 I5 11mad Srrecr S_ Iojlhcc 80083i.8666 kYfl2 ��--.. T3,999i tPN'Wa51IIH:00111. April 12, 2012 City of Salem Planning Board c/o Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street,Third Floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject:Traffic Impact Peer Review—Proposed Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove .Dear Members of the Board: As requested, Fay,Spofford &Thorndike is submitting this letter to summarize our peer review findings pertaining to the traffic impact of the proposed Legacy Park Apartments redevelopment at Harmony Grove Road. In connection with this peer review,the following information has been reviewed: • Traffic Impact and Access Study, Proposed Legacy Apartments at Harmony Grove,Salem, MA, Vanasse &Associates, Inc., (referred to as the`TIAs') December 2011 • City of Salem Planning Board December 2011 Application forms signed by the Applicant and Owner including: - City of Salem Application for Planned Unit Development Special Permit—& 60-64 Grove Street - City of Salem Application Site Plan Review - Project Narrative in Support of PUD and Site Plan Review Applications for Legacy Apartments at 60-64 Grove Street&3 Harmony Grove Road • Site Plan for Mixed-Use Development—Legacy Apartments at 60-64 Grove Street&3 Harmony Grove Road, December 2011,Griffin Engineering Group, LLC(referred to as the 'Site Plans') Additionally,the peer reviewer conducted a site visit on Wednesday February 15, 2012 during the PM peak period. During the site visit,existing conditions and traffic operations in the site vicinity and at the analyzed study area network intersections were observed. Also observed were the available sight lines at the proposed site driveway locations associated with the Site Plans. The TIAS indicates that at full build-out, the former Salem Oil &Grease site will include 141 apartment units plus 15,000 square feet (sf)of office space developed from an existing 17,000 sf building to be refurbished. The site plans indicates that four two-way access driveways will serve the site at or within existing curb cuts. A continuous driveway between Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road will serve _ Etif 11 1",__ PL9ti VERS W11''NTB I' Trusted Partners for DesignSolutions T FAY,SPOFFORD&e THORNDIKE ' City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 2 of 12 the site apartments. The future cross-site driveway will include a new on-site bridge with a �1 sidewalk on the east side replacing an existing ✓ r narrow wood/metal bridge (see right).The residential cross-site driveway will also include a new at-grade railroad crossing of a low volume/low speed freight rail track via an existing railroad crossing easement. The southernmost of the three site-related Grove Street driveways will serve the residential component of the site. The two northern Grove Street driveways will serve the office component of the site. The southern office driveway serves 13 Looking south from Harmony Grove Road tenant spaces while for tenants while the northern Existing bridge to be replaced with a 24- office driveway serves 11 tenant spaces plus the site loading dock located in the same area as the footbridge and 5-foot sidewalk existing building loading dock. immediately to the west as part of a residential access driveway between Grove FST's traffic impacts peer review is guided by Street and Harmony Grove Road Sections 6.7.5 and 9.5.6 of the City of Salem's Zoning Ordinance adopted September 10, 2009, as amended. 1. (6.7.5 Traffic Impact Study) 'A detailed traffic impact analysis in accordance with professional engineering standards is required for any special permit or site plan approval... A registered professional engineer experienced and qualified in traffic engineering shall prepare the traffic impact study. 2. A proposed mitigation plan must be included: A plan (with supporting text) to minimize traffic and safety impacts through such means as physical design and layout concepts, or other appropriate means;and an interior traffic and pedestrian circulation plan designed to minimize conflicts and safety problems. Measures shall be proposed to achieve the following post development standards: All streets and intersections to be impacted by the project shall have the same level of service or better than predevelopment conditions. The SPGA must determine that the mitigation is satisfactory." "(9.5.6 Review Criteria) The Planning Board shall review and amend all such submitted plans in accordance with the following criteria (note: only traffic circulation review criteria is presented below): 1. Adequacy of parking facilities and number of parking spaces proposed for each development t FAY,SPOFFORD&THORNDIKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 3 of 12 2. Adequacy of loading facilities, 3. Adequacy of traffic circulation system, 4. Adequacy of access points and routes to and from the land parcel to adjoining streets and ways,and.... 11. Adequacy of pedestrian circulation systems to and from parking areas and structures," PEER REVIEW FINDINGS STUDY AREA ADEQUACY The study area selected for intersections for analysis in the TIAS included: • Mason and Grove Streets at Harmony Grove Road (unsignalized) • Grove at Goodhue Streets (unsignalized) • Beaver at Grove Streets (unsignalized) • Grove at Boston and Nichols Streets (offset signalized intersection) We conclude the study area analyzed is adequate for addressing the site's primary traffic impacts in accordance with standard industry and City of Salem requirements. FST's NRCC Transportation Study did apply traffic generated by the Legacy Park development and documented in the TIAS, as discussed below,to a larger traffic network that was expected to have traffic generated by the five NRCC developments in aggregate. Therefore,traffic generated by the Legacy Park site was added to intersections like Boston Street at Bridge Street, Flint at Mason Streets, Flint at Bridge Streets, Mason at Tremont Streets,and Boston at Aborn Streets along with the projected traffic from the other four NRCC redevelopment sites. TRIP GENERATION AND TRIP DISTRIBUTION ASSUMPTIONS Consistent with the ITE Trip Generation report(8`h Edition, 2008)the Legacy Park Apartments TIAS indicates the development at full build out will generate approximately 1,144 vehicle trips on a daily basis or 572 trips in and 572 trips out. It projects that 96 trips will be generated during a typical AM peak hour. Of these, 61 will be in the outbound direction and 35 will be in the inbound direction. During the afternoon PM peak hour,the TIAS expects the site to generate approximately 117 vehicle trips, of which 66 will be in the inbound direction while 51 will be in the off-peak outbound direction. The TIAS trip generation analysis as presented is acceptable. We note there is a minor difference between the Application and the TIAS in that the Development Application indicates the existing office space from i17,000 square feet (sf)will be reoccupied,while the TIAS indicates it will be reduced to .15,000 sf. If the future office space remains as existing(i.e.,'17,000 sf),the TIAS estimates of future trips pertaining to the office component of the Legacy site based on 115,000 sf are slightly understated. However,the difference of 2,000 sf is relatively small and does not significantly affect the analysis e FAY,SPOFFORD&THORiNDIKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 4 of 12 findings, as the trip generation differences amount to fewer than 5 vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hours and fewer than 40 vehicle trips on a 24-hour basis. The projected trip distribution pattern of the site-generated trips was based on the year 2000 Journey to Work Census Data.This methodology is acceptable, as the year 2010 Journey to Work Census data is not yet available and the distribution pattern is consistent with observations of traffic in the area. ASSUMED NO-BUILD/BUILD PROJECTIONS The approach to No-Build/Build projections cited in the TIAS uses the traditional three-phase analysis to estimate AM and PM peak hour traffic and is acceptable. Phase 1 involves adding a certain amount of unknown traffic growth to the 'background'. In this case,a 1% per year compounded annual growth rate was added, as it is representative of a stable low growth environment pertaining to the area. Phase 2 involves estimating AM and PM peak hour trips generated from a list of NRCC programmed developments. Programmed developments include trips generated by the Riverview Place located off Mason and Flint Streets, 28 Goodhue Street opposite the Legacy Park Apartments site, and the Gateway Center development east of Bridge Street and north of Boston Street. Trips from these three approved developments were added to the unknown 'background'traffic growth for the Legacy Park study area network by distributing the additional trips in accordance with published traffic impact reports or observed trip distribution patterns from traffic count data. Because the Flynntan site did not have a specific development plan, its potential development was assumed to be included in the Phase I 'unknown background traffic' component of the analysis. Phase 3 involves identifying and accounting for any roadway system changes programmed in the area. At this time, no specific changes are programmed for public streets in the Study Area. The future Build Alternative adds estimated trips from the Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove to the adjacent roadway network distributes them in accordance with the anticipated driveway locations using the year 2000 Journey to Work census data, as noted above. We conclude that the above method used in the TIAS to project future No-Build and Build Legacy Park trips is acceptable. The methodology employed is consistent with industry standards and Salem requirements. FUTURE INTERSECTION AND DRIVEWAY OPERATIONS The TIAS approach/methodology used to analyze future intersection and driveway conditions is consistent with industry standards and is acceptable. The latest accepted methodology is employed to perform analysis and Synchro 7 is approved for use by MassDOT. During the initial public hearing,there was much concern raised about the driveway operations at the intersection of Harmony Grove Road and the future site driveway. The analysis indicates that the FAY,SPOITORD&e THORNDIKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 5 of 12 intersection should operate acceptably. Based on observed peak hour operations in the area,we concur with the analysis findings. The analysis does indicate that by 2016,the intersections of Harmony Grove Road at Mason and Grove Streets will experience operational problems during the PM peak period. DRIVEWAY SIGHT LINES iiv r r _ Looking west on Harmony Grove Road east Looking east on Harmony Grove Road east of future residential driveway of future residential driveway r Rq. Looking south on Grove Street near Looking north on Grove Street near future office use driveways future office use driveways oil Looking south on Grove Street to Goodhue Looking north on Grove Street near future Street near future site residential driveway site residential use driveway FAY,SPOFFORD ase THORNDI KI: City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 6 of 12 The analysis of driveway sight lines for the residential driveways contained in the TIAS is consistent with site observations performed on February 15, 2012 (see photos on the previous page). The TIAS addresses available stopping sight distance at three of the four driveways shown on the Site Plans. Site Plans generally call for modifying and re-using existing Salem Oil and Grease driveway curb cuts. Observations indicate that future driveway sight lines at all three Grove Street curb cuts exceed 200 feet and are acceptable, as are the sight lines for the future Harmony Grove Road Driveway, as long as hedge trimming is maintained to a height of 3.5'within the necessary sight triangles for each of the site driveways. During months when vegetation is in leaf,as indicated in the TIAS,vegetation must be kept trimmed back to ensure adequate driveway sight lines and sight triangles for vehicles exiting the site. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCOMMODATIONS The TIAS, under Recommendations,Transportation Demand Management Measures, recommends non- specific pedestrian and bicycle accommodations be provided within the project. The Site Plans identify pedestrian accommodations (i.e.,ADA compliant sidewalks generally on the north side of the residential driveway and on one side of the residential driveway and six crosswalks). Additionally,ADA accessible sidewalks are not indicated on the re-occupied office building plan, so its ADA compliance cannot be verified at this time. The Site Plans do not indicate where or if bicycle storage facilities are proposed. Because the MBTA Salem Commuter Rail Station is a relatively short bike ride from the site, consistent with the TIAS, we recommend the Applicant encourage bike use on the site along with walking to and from the Salem Station, recognizing that bikes can travel to and from the Station within approximately 7 minutes,while walking approximately 20 minutes. This will help reduce auto demands to and from the site. EXISTING AND FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND QUEUING ASSESSMENTS The TIAS provides tables summarizing existing and future projected levels of service that were analyzed in accordance with industry standards. Queuing assessments for the two-way stop controlled intersections are provided in the TIAS Technical Appendix. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) does not include a methodology for estimating queues at all-way stops, such as that at the intersection of Harmony Grove Road at Grove and Mason Streets.' The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual,Transportation Research Board,2010,soon to be adopted by MassDOT for traffic analyses, includes an equation that can be used to calculate 95`"percentile queues at all-way stop intersections. FAY,SPOFFORD&-CHORi iDIKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 7 of 12 PARKING FACILITIES AND PEAK PARKING DEMANDS The Legacy Park Apartments site proposes a total of 215 spaces for the residential component of the development and 24 spaces for the commercial component of the development for a site total of 239 parking spaces. The ITE Parking Generation report(4`h Edition, 2010) indicates that during peak parking demand periods, usually from 12 midnight to 5 AM,the residential parking supply should be more than adequate to accommodate peak demands from the proposed 141 apartment units. On average, during the late night hours, peak parking demands of the apartment component of the site should be approximately 173 spaces, with a 95%confidence level of approximately 193 spaces. On the other hand,the office component supply is proposed at 14 spaces,which is less than the ITE average parking demand for office uses is 2.84 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or43 spaces for 15,000 sf and 49 spaces for 17,000 square feet. However, both ITE Parking Generation (4th Edition, 2010)and ULI Shared Parking(2nd Edition,2005) data would suggest that weekday mid-day apartment parking demands between the hours of 7 AM and 7 PM are likely to be no more than 75%of the daily peak,at late night Therefore, mid-day peak shared parking demands of the apartments should be approximately 130 spaces,with the 95%confidence level of 145 spaces. The big picture is that during the 7 AM to 7 PM period, consolidated peak mid-day parking demands of residential plus office users will be approximately 173 to 194 spaces. Itis recommended that as a condition, the Applicant submit a shared parking agreement plan to be activated if and when the number of employees exceeds 24, as indicated on Site Plan C-3. TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation measures proposed in the TIAS include the following: • Grove, Beaver and Goodhue Streets intersection o Provide pavement markings to delineate lanes o Install a stop sign on the Grove Street northbound approach to Goodhue Street o Install a stop sign on the Beaver Street westbound approach to Grove Street o Install a stop sign on the Beaver Street eastbound approach to Grove Street o Add signs to help enforce one-way flow on Goodhue Street • Grove Street at Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street o Place northbound right turn movement from Grove Street to Mason Street under stop control rather than as a free right turn o Replace/upgrade intersection signs at and approaching the intersection • Site Access o Place stop signs at all two-way access driveways and have minimum 12-foot lanes for each driveway lane. FAY.SPOFFORD&T'HORNDIKL City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 8 of 12 • Transportation Demand Management Measures o Provide MBTA services information to residents o Provide on-site pedestrian and bicycle accommodations DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALKS MITIGATION Driveways on Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road across the entire site frontage should be have 'Inlaid'concrete sidewalks across them to clearly define the pedestrian space,with drivers yielding to pedestrians. Sidewalks generally should be upgraded to the City's standard concrete sidewalks along the site frontages on Harmony Grove Road and Grove Street. The proposed Grove Street site driveway directly adjacent to the railroad corridor is constricted by the office-building footprint that juts out toward the railroad within 14 feet of the rail right of way. Even though the volume this driveway will be serving will be very low, its continuous 14-foot width is too narrow for two-way traffic plus pedestrians from the office building using the rear parking area going back and forth to their cars. Loading maneuvers at the existing loading area will be very constrained, as trucks serving the office building will need to back out onto Grove Street,as there is no area to turn around. We would recommend consideration of an alternate method for loading operations. It is recommended the Applicant consider consolidating the two driveways servicing the office area into one driveway. If doing so,the idea is to create a loading space offset from but parallel to the Grove Street sidewalk for the design truck vehicle (assumed to be typical SU-30 wheelbase vehicle)to arrive and depart. The assumption is that the existing loading dock would be accessed using portable dollies from the front to the rear of the building rather ` tF .� than backing the truck out onto Grove Street M across the Grove Street sidewalk. This will allow the Applicant to relocate the office driveway w' slightly to the north and reconfigure the front parking lot to retain the proposed number of parking spaces available for the office use. Thus, the narrow 14' constraint for the driveway connecting the two parking lots would be used a " small number of autos from the rear parking area - !� and office-related pedestrians only. RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING MITIGATION " The existing Grove Street at-grade railroad crossing and the proposed new on-site at-grade driveway railroad crossing within the study area were not discussed in the TIAS. While the rail Looking south to Grove Street Railroad Crossing service involves just one landowner in the City of Peabody,the TIAS should recommend appropriate traffic control devices in compliance with the current US Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD), as amended. MUTCD-compliant signs and markings are needed at the new on-site rail crossing. It is recommended r FAY,SPOFFORD&t THORNDIKt. City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 9 of 12 that existing signage and markings at the Grove Street crossing(see right)should also be updated to comply with current standards. HARMONY GROVE ROAD AT GROVE AND MASON STREETS MITIGATION Because this intersection serves access to the main Legacy Park Apartments site entrance on Harmony Grove Road, it is important that its traffic operations remain acceptable. The TIAS indicates this intersection has a crash rate that exceeds the average MassDOT District 4 criteria for unsignalized intersections. To improve intersection safety, the TIAS calls for replacing signs and markings at the intersection and adding stop control to what is at present a free right turn movement northbound from Grove to Mason Street. The idea is to bring the signage and markings up to current MUTCD standards. With the Applicant's proposed mitigation,the overall level of service remains the same as with the No- Build, but the analysis indicates that the Build worsens delays at the intersection compared to the No- Build, particularly during the afternoon peak period. q x 7 Potential Mini-roundabout at Harmony Grove Potential all-way stop T intersection at Harmony Road, Grove, and Mason Streets Grove Road, Grove, and Mason Streets From the illustration above, FST's NRCC Transportation Study,currently underway, is exploring the potential for replacing the four-way stop intersection with a three-way yield-controlled mini- roundabout, similar to the alternative recommended in the 2003 North River Canal Neighborhood Master Planning Study'or with a modified all-way stop'T' intersection that might eventually be traffic signal controlled. As envisioned, it is anticipated that the mini-roundabout would require raised splitter islands on all three of its approaches to create deflection.The southbound approach on Grove Street would retain stop control, but re-oriented slightly to the west with an extension of the Mack Park landscape. It is anticipated that the center island will need to be fully mountable for use by the design vehicles and that truck U-turns would need to be prohibited. 2 North River Canal Corridor Master Planning Study,Goody Clancy with EarthTech,2003. f FAY,SPOFFORD&e THORNDIKE City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 10 of 12 Also shown above is a conceptual illustration of a potential all-way stop 'T' intersection alternative to the mini-roundabout. The T alternative concept would have a 3-way all-way stop,with an off-set stop for the southbound Grove Street approach. As illustrated on the previous page,the offset T intersections would operate better than the existing 4-way stop, while addressing potential feasibility issues pertaining to the steep Grove Street grade approaching Mason Street as well as improving intersection safety features for all modes of travel including pedestrians and cyclists. f The February 15th site visit found that creation of a mini-roundabout will be very challenging, as the intersection has a steep Mason Street upgrade from the Grove Street northbound approach. Creation of potential mini- roundabout would require re-grading within Grove Street the context of observed grades approaching the intersection,especially for vehicles passing through from Harmony Grove Road to Mason Street direction. While the feasibility of creating a mini-roundabout has not yet been fully confirmed, it appears that Harmony Grove looking west to Mason and the dimensions of the public layout are Grove Streets at Harkin Square adequate to accommodate one,should resolution of vertical grades on Grove Street northbound approach be workable. It appears an 80'-90' inscribed circle consistent with the Federal Highway Administration's mini-roundabout design criteria as contained in FHWA-SA-10-007) is achievable. We recommend the Applicant work with the Planning Board to mitigate the negative impact at the intersection of Harmony Grove Road, Grove, and Mason Streets in a manner consistent with the City's vision for the Grove Street corridor as cited in its 2003 NRCC Master Plan, and the ongoing NRCC Transportation Study. GROVE, GOODHUE,AND BEAVER STREETS INTERSECTION MITIGATION The 2003 NRCC Master Plan proposed construction of a roundabout at this wide open intersection that contains an informal, unmarked, neighborhood parking area. Observations indicate that the intersection often accommodates large truck rigs both in the parking area and adjacent to the outer edge of the Goodhue Street approach to Beaver Street. The TIAS recommends that the parking area be formalized and that signage be added to enforce the one-way end of Goodhue Street. FST's recent NRCC Transportation Planning Study is exploring two options for this intersection, either re- orienting it as a T intersection toward Beaver Street, or as proposed in the 2003 Master Plan, or converting it to a mini-roundabout (see concepts on the page that follows). FAY,SPOFFORD&Y THORNDIKF City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 11 of 12 kw £ v Potential Mini-roundabout at Goodhue, Potential T intersection at Goodhue, Beaver, Beaver, and Grove Streets with Goodhue and Grove Streets with portion of Goodhue Street remaining one-way, as today Street two-way Either option would add a significant amount of landscaping to the area and either would create potential flood storage capability while creating a pedestrian and bicycle circulation environment far superior to existing observed conditions. While both the options for the Goodhue, Beaver,and Grove Streets intersection illustrated above may make sense from an urban design perspective,they are not required to mitigate traffic increases associated with the Legacy Park Apartments, as this intersection is not problematic from a traffic capacity analysis perspective using the City of Salem's guidelines or standard traffic engineering practices. The Applicant proposes to clarify existing flow patterns at the intersection by adding new signage, markings, and some small channelization islands at the ends of the intersection parking area. From a traffic mitigation perspective, the measures proposed by the Applicant for implementation at this intersection are acceptable as interim safety measures prior to construction of more significant urban design and traffic calming measures,such as those illustrated above. It is important to distinguish between necessary traffic mitigation measures and the vision for the Grove Street corridor between the Goodhue, Beaver, and Grove Streets and Harmony Grove Road and Mason Street intersection. This corridor is not only the focal point of Legacy Park development, but two other developments proposed in the NRCC Area --the 28 Goodhue Street development, and the Goodhue Street edge of the future Flynntan re-development site. As such,the City will need to partner with a wide array of stakeholders along Grove Street in order to implement the gamut of potential Grove Street infrastructure modifications that are more than typical 'traffic mitigation' measures. The broader Grove Street corridor vision has been outlined in FST's Preliminary Recommendations for the North FAY,SPOFFORD&THORNDIK2: City of Salem Planning Board April 12, 2012 Page 12 of 12 River Canal Corridor Transportation Study (3/29/12 presentation)that is currently under review and is posted on the City's website. Infrastructure changes well in excess of normal traffic mitigation measures are needed to transform the Goodhue/Grove Street corridor into one that serves all of its users well, including the provision of ADA accessible sidewalks, accommodations for bike users between the site and the MBIA, etc. Transformation is needed to create a Grove Street corridor that serves the circulation needs of all of its neighbors in a manner that will achieve positive and sustainable long-term economic and quality of life expectations. • The TIAS was generally well done. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this traffic impacts peer review on behalf of the City of Salem Planning Board and will be available to answer any questions that the Board may have on the peer review findings detailed above. We look forward to presenting the peer review findings cited above at an upcoming meeting. Very truly yours, Fay,Spofford &Thorndike By Gary L. Hebert, PE, PTOE Vice President LG-410H GLH:gh Page 1 of 4 TASK ORDER NO. 10 TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT L-23 BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR MASTER SERVICES (NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE SERVICES) This is Task Order No. 10 attached to and made part of the Master Services Agreement L-23 dated March 15, 2010 between Fay, Spofford &Thorndike, LLC, 5 Burlington Woods, Burlington, MA 01803 (ENGINEER) and the City of Salem, 93 Washington Street, Salem, MA 01970 (OWNER). This Task Order No. 10 describes the Scope of Services, Time Schedule, Charges, and Payment Conditions for the Task Order known as: Traffic Impact Peer Review of Proposed Salem Oil and Grease Development at Grove and Harmony Grove Streets in the City of Salem. Overview Task Order No. 10 work involves a detailed peer review of a traffic impact and access study for a proposed mixed use development entitled"Traffic Impact and Access Study, Proposed Legacy Apartments at Harmony Grove" conducted by VAI and dated December 2011. 1. Scope of Basic and Special Services A. ENGINEER shall orovide for OWNER the followina specific BASIC SERVICES: • Review the submitted Traffic Impact and Analysis Study • Conduct a site visit during the afternoon peak hour to observe existing conditions in the site vicinity including potential sight lines. • Assess the data contained in the study and compare with current best practices for traffic impact and access study analysis including adequacy of: o Study Area o Trip Generation and Trip Distribution assumptions o Assumed No-Build analysis/Build analyses o Future driveway operations including auto/truck accommodations sight lines and pedestrian/bike accommodations o Existing and future Level of Service and queuing assessments Page 2 of 4 o Parking facilities to accommodate peak parking demands • Determine whether the prescribed mitigation items in the Traffic Impact Study are acceptable and the best alternative for mitigating the proposed site redevelopment's traffic impacts compared to existing conditions. Determine whether the proposed mitigation will provide reasonably safe means of access for City of Salem residents and visitors to the area, or conceptually identify alternative or additional mitigation measures that may be needed to achieve reasonably safe access. • Document the peer review findings in a letter to the Planning Board. The fee assumes the peer reviewer will attend two Public Hearings of the Planning Board pertaining to this proposed development. 2. Owner's Responsibilities The OWNER has furnished the ENGINEER for performance of Services as required by the Agreement, with all available plans and traffic studies and reports related to the referenced project site. Schedule The time period for the performance of ENGINEER's Services is as follows:. Following Notice to Proceed, FST anticipates completing Task 1 within two weeks of a Notice to Proceed with meetings in accordance with the Salem Planning Board hearing schedule. Budget for Peer Review City of Salem Budget Estimate Staff Role Antici ated Hours Budget Gary Hebert Peer Reviewer 26 $4,680 Task Order No. 10 will be completed at a total budget Not-to-Exceed $4,680 including direct expenses. Page 3 of 4 Compensation and Invoicing Compensation for Services of the ENGINEER described in this Task Order No.10 will be on the following basis: Requested services will be completed on an hourly basis at a cost Not to Exceed $4,680. Invoices will be submitted monthly. Terms and Conditions The terms and conditions of the Agreement referred to above shall apply to this Task Order except to the extent expressly modified herein. In the event of any such modification, the modification shall be set forth below and the Article of the Agreement to be modified shall be specifically referenced. No modifications are included in this Task Order: Terms or Provisions in Conflict If the provisions set forth in the Agreement are in conflict with the provisions set forth in this Task Order, the provisions of this Task Order shall govern. Page 4 of 4 Acceptance of the terms of this Task Order No.10 is acknowledged by the following authorized signatures of the parties to the Agreement: FAY, SPOFFORD & THORNDIKE, LLC CITY OF SALEM By: By. 04444 A4� Authoriz d Signature Kimberley Driscoll Mayor Gary L. Hebert, P.E.. Vice President Authorized Officer (Print Name) 4LG.jDuncan, AICP Director of Planning and Community elopment David Knowlton, P.E. City Engineer Th mas P. Watkins Purchasing Agent Approved as to form by: 12 Elizabeth Rennard, Esq., City Solicitor TASK ORDER MADE AS OF: Date: January 2012 Funding Source: Object: Oro. 94 YrJ - -14 At, 'Ow M lot- am Avel .0 Trimpo%, Generation by Tyne F. n. x Apartmens 6 72/unit 051 0 62/unit`h' Residential _ N = a P `ry Single family 9.71/unit 0.75-1 .01/unit ` � GeneralOffice 11 01/ksf " 'I'.551 49/ksf Commercial Medical office 36:13/ksf 2.3 3 46/ksf �ppi g � - - Shb in Ctr 42:94/ksfr 1:`03=3.75/ksf Daily Trips 50 40 30 - 20 10 - 0 Apartments homes Gen. Office Med. Office Shopping Ctr FST ;i 77 - IT,d I?4 WE An v7", e1 1 ra ge I F-1M11M G riOn dyne Apartment 6.72/unit 80.510.62/unit Residential _ - 47 Single family 9.71/unit 0.75-1 .01/unit r General�Office 11 °01/ksf :; 41 .55-1 .49/ksf x COmmerd61 Medical Office 36.13/ksf 2.3 3.46/ksf �. Shopping Ctr 42:94/ksf = 1 .03-3.75/ksf. Daity Trips 50 40 30 20 10 0 Apartments homes Gen. Office Med. Office Shopping Ctr FSS' IWO I 10 New England Business Center Drive - Suite 314 Andover, MA 01810-1066 Office: 978-474-8800 Fax: 978-688-6508 Email: gham@@rdva.com www.rdva.com F. Giles Ham Principal Le .Q L I Notice -zQt (00+(0L1 GrOVe S-titec\- I I lam` k CITY OFF SALEM T _ �s _ 0 PLANNING BOARD iflll—JAN —4--A4)4+— CITY CLERK SALEM.MASS. City of Salem Planning Board 978-619-5685 Will hold a Site Plan Review and Special Permit public hearing in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5, Site Plan Review, Section 7.3, Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Section 8.1, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Overlay District, at the request of MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC, for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE RD and 60 & 64 GROVE ST (Map 16, Lots 236, 237 & 239), Salem MA (redevelopment of the former site of Salem Oil & Grease factory). The proposed project includes construction of three multi-family residential buildings (total of 141 units), re-use of an existing 17,000 square foot commercial office building, and associated parking.and,landscaping_. The public hearing will be held on Thursday, January 19, 2012 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo Chair Salem News, Jan. 5 & 12, 2012 t I`afll� ( ili't1, e�l ,nc, Ori 77w , 4 BIZ lo:ot q, ? Iii 6E 3�v 1r to i3 tt 4»t F iz lC, ---- � - 0414--*t- A.OX. - - - - -- ---- - ---- 11'... CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD City of Salem Planning Board FILE N CITY CLERK, SALEM,MASS. Will hold a continued public hearing at the request of MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC for Site Plan Review,Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE RD and 60& 64 GROVE ST (Map 16,Lots 236, 237 & 239), Salem MA. Site plan has been revised to include two additional parcels, 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE RD (Map 16,Lots 377 & 378),with no change to the number of proposed residential units: The continued public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM,in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning&Community Development,Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo Chair • Salem News, Oct. 4& 11, 2012 City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all interested parties on the application of PASQUANNA DEVELOPERS, INC. for a Definitive Subdivision Plan for five (5) single-family house lots on the property located at 18 THORNDIKE ST., Salem, MA (Assessors Map 37,Lot 38). Construction of a new roadway is proposed to serve two of the newly created lots on Thomdike St. Access one lot is from Thorndike St., and access to two lots is from Hubon St. This hearing will be held on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313,Third Floor at 120 Washington Street. This hearing will be held in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Salem. Copies of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning and Community Development,located on the third floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo Chair • Salem News, Oct. 4& 11, 2012 w ®n �, {{,ft,(,� 77�,, 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSA P HONE f4M48 QC8.GI%0404 '�9 I0. rE. 0,?t0'L Pace 6 of 6 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 978-619-5685 WILL HOLD A CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 978-619-5685 Will hold a continued public hearing at the request or MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC for Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE: RD and 60 & 64 GROVE ST (Map 16,.Lots 236, 237 & 234), Salem MA. Site plan has been revised to include tvic additional parcels, 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE RD (Map 16, Lots 377 & 378), with no change to the number or proposed residential units. The continued public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 16, 2012 alt 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massae;ase,ts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review durinc normal husiness hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third floor, 120 Washincton Street, Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo Chair SN 1014, 10/11/12 Appeared in: The Salem News on Thursday, 10/04/201.2 rss+ exF�v7hr��ueA�sC{<-+,.x<?zu CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION OF ABUTTERS AND "PARTIES IN INTEREST" BOARD/COMMISSION: Zoning Board of Appeals PROJECT SITE: 3 Harmony Grove (16_0239_0) 60 Grove Street (1602370) 64 Grove Street (16_02360) DATE: 1/3/2012 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT: Parties in Interest: The applicant Abutters Owners of land opposite any street or way Abutters and abutters to abutters within 300 feet Planning boards of abutting cities and towns This is to certify that the time of the last assessment for taxation made by the City of Salem, the names and addresses of those listed on the attached sheets are "parties in interest" (as defined by Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A, Section 11) to the parcel(s) of land listed above as the project site. Assessor's Signature: Date: l 3az012— Number of initialed pages attached: Once Certified, Return to: Danielle McKnight Department of Planning and Community Development s. i �, � �. / �, �'°�. i'i� l�� iii � ♦;d? I • J I��� '�d °oma [ �'��.+�'�� �� ya � S ark �v P dF � •� fw 2r�+ +e,�S'rr�ry++self�`o :45�+,. :. :�- , 's r■3*tom+t q� '�y��f , ,rr.� of 8 �P '� t � ♦ql djy.„.,� � N �,;•J� F a RL�[a v�'to �, .A:*{ sR 1 as J . �. �y '.,► `tr ar° ,r”y g r ego. 4 �_a toy r.< #' �I nl►�' 16_0233_801 16_0230_0 16_0226_0 SACCO PAMELA DEMEULE SHAWN BURKE JAMES 10 BEAVER STREET UI 24 BEAVER STREET 36 BEAVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_802 16_0170_0 16_0165_0 JOHNSON KEVIN FELDMAN MARC KRAUSE TIMOTHY S PO BOX 2431 25 BEAVER ST 37 BEAVER STREET PROVIDENCE,RI 02860 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_803 16_0229_0 16_0224_0 JOHNSON KEVIN W BASH FLORENCE L CONLEY JAMES F P O BOX 2431 28 BEAVER ST 38 BEAVER STREET PROVIDENCE,RI 02860 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_804 16_0169_0 16_0164_0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP HANTM TRIANTAFILLOS MARCHAND RAYMOND M 8200 JONES BRANCH DR 29 BEAVER STREET 39 BEAVER ST MCLEAN,VA 22102-3110 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 7 16_0174_0 16_0228_0 16_0380_0 DIVISION 18 A 0 H CLUB INC MESA ANA PATTISON MARK W 104 BOSTON ST 30 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 � SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA 01923 I 16_0232_0 160168_0 16_0384_0 MYERS PATRICIA WILLIAMSON NICHOLAS S PATTISON MARK W 14 BEAVER ST 31 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA 01929 I 16_0173_0 16_0227 0 16_0223_0 LATAWIEC PAULINE F LAWSON BRUCE M A&N REAL ESTATE TRUST 17 BEAVER STREET 27 LEBLANC ROAD 7 PAULINE RD SALEM,MA 01970 PEABODY,MA 01960 DANVERS,MA 01923 i 16_0235_0 16_0167_0 -� 16_0158_801 PATTISON MARK W SIMPSON RUTH A I POSTE STACY 65 CENTRE STREET 33 BEAVER STREET 12 FRANCIS STREET DANVERS,MA 01923 SALEM,MA 01970 EVERETT,MA 02149 16_0231_0 16_0225_0 16_0158_802 ROSS RUSSELL R TUCKER ROBERT E CORLISS MICHAEL 20 BEAVER STREET 34 BEAVER STREET 41 BEAVER STREET U2 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0171_0 16_0166_0 16_0 22_0 BURKE THOMAS W GREENWOOD LINDA KOHLOFER MERRILL B 23 BEAVER STREET 35 BEAVER STREET 44 BEAVER STREET i SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 - SALEM,MA 01970 16_0220_0 16_0158808 16_0143_0 EASLEY ERIC QINN BARBARA J OLIVEIRA ERNESTO S 145B SPOFFORD ROAD 130 BOSTON STREET U8 72 GROVE ST BOXFORD,MA 01921 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0234_ ,0 16_0158_809 16_0142_0 MCSWIGGIPETER M MACHADO JENNIFER CORREIA JOSE JR 21 LIBERTY STREET 130 BOSTON STREET U9 73 GROVE ST MIDDLETON,MA 01949 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 J_- L_._� 16_0146_0 16_0372_0 16_0144_0 G&M KATIS REALTY TRUST NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC - ETHAN REALTY TRUST 381 MAIN STREET 282 BENNINGTON STREET PO BOX 462 ACTON,MA 01720 BOSTON,MA 02128 NORTH READING,MA 01864 i 16_0148_0 16_0242_1 16_0141_0 DI VISION 18 A O H CLUB INC HARMONY GROVE CORPORATION SILVA JOSE F i 104 BOSTON ST 30 GROVE STREET 75 GROVE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0172_0 16_0242_0 16_0377_0 CHILDREN'S FRIEND FAM SERVICES HARMONY GROVE CORPORATION HARMONY GROVE CORP 110 BOSTON STREET 30 GROVE STREET 30 GROVE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0158803 16_0238_0 16_0239_0 YOUNG_JOHN D 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST,LLC MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC 126 BOSTON STREET U3 7 RANTOUL STREET P O BOX 388 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 BEVERLY,MA 01915 16_0158_804 16_0368_0 16_0378_0 THOMPSON CORA L P-MAC,LP HARMONY GROVE CORP 128 BOSTON STREET U4 74 GILCREST ROAD 30 GROVE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 LONDONDERRY,NH 03053 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0158_805 16_0237_0 16_0366_0 PRESSON PAMELA R MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC JANKOWSKI ZYGMUNT 128 BOSTON STREET U5 PO BOX 388 119 MASON STREET SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0158_806 16_0371_0 16_0217_0 CHARTIER ELIZABETH PHILSON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SABRES DANIEL T 130 BOSTON STREET U6 P O BOX 5580 12 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915-0521 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0158_807 16_0236_0 16_0216_0 HARRITY MAUREEN F MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC RAYMOND JAMES 130 BOSTON STREET U7 P O BOX 388 18 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 SALEM,MA 01970 Dj 160376_0 MIRANDA REALTY TRUST 2 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 16_0219_0 FLORES PAUL R 6 SILVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 i 16_0218_0 FLORESPAULR 6 SILVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 I i i I i I JT r, '1 .1 • 1 . •11 '1 . .1 1 1+ ♦ rY/,�� �a/I <4�jMl �r`d ;q►� � �`s���+ . r. ^I `. •°g��i -'gym, .®4�; .� ..s��. i �. r {r. 41�*r'♦ d s J 4 �v r? a �i .4th/' • 1+ ,� i1 1 1p•,;4�1� �� , •J+ Rf �l }• _ `�/a[��D'� 4.r ` •O a t1�v� �y} � :F_ di� �.��4fs,�f gj�', i+ ' -... ��1. �f `r;*.taF1• �#� �B S , * ,a . ���r.� �®f ftQ - r^ �• egg. �."*k�+ �I. r+ ' i��./r,'�4¢` wJ a Y� �#' s.i' 1.�� ���{^`'•�y®fp.� � < • 1 9 Abutter Notice OR 11 Notice of Decision @'Mailed notice to abutter list certified by Assessor (Date: Ilif 12_Initials:) Lrfailed notice to the following Planning Boards of abutting cities and towns (Date: jly L2 Initials:_�d9): Office of the Planning Board 22 Monument Avenue Swampscott, Massachusetts 01907 Peabody Planning Board Office of Community Development & Planning 24 Lowell Street Peabody, Massachusetts 01960 Lynn Planning Board 3 City Hall Square Lynn, Massachusetts 01901 Marblehead Planning Board Abbot Hall 188 Washington Street Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945 City of Beverly Planning Board 191 Cabot Street Beverly, Massachusetts 01915 Town of Danvers Planning Board 1 Sylvan Street Danvers, Massachusetts 01923 �rti�,,�1 �-e-`I� d ', I Easy P6el®labels _ �ti"r n Sow 1 ♦ Bend along line to - e Tm Use Avery®Template 51600 W\y,a 5+v"' j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeT'^ i e \ ��rd.� AVERY 6960 a 16_0233_801 16_0230_0 16_0226_0 SACCO PAMELA ( DEMEULE SHAWN I BURKE JAMES I � ' 10 BEAVER S'I REET UI 24 BEAVER STREET j36 BEAVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_802 16_0170_0 16_0165_0 {- JOHNSON KEVIN FELDMAN MARC KRAUSE TIMOTHY S 111 PO BOX 2431 25 BEAVER ST 37 BEAVER STREET PROVIDENCE,RI 02860 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 1 I 16_0233_803 16_0229_0 16_0224_0 j JOHNSON KEVIN W BASH FLORENCE I CONLEY JAMES P O BOX 2431 28 BEAVER ST 38 BEAVER STREET PROVIDENCE,RI 02860 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_804 16_0169_0 16_0164_0 C FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP HANTZIS TRIANTAFILLOS MARCHAND RAYMOND M 8200 JONES BRANCH DR 29 BEAVER STREET 39 BEAVER ST MCLEAN,VA 22102-3110 SALEM,NSA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 I 16_0174_0 16_0228_0 i 16_0380_0 DIVISION 18 A 0 H CLUB INC MESAANA PATTISON MARK 104 BOSTON ST 30 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 i SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA 01923 16_0232_0 16_0168_0 16_0384_0 j MYERS PATRICIA I WILLIAMSON NICHOLAS S PATTISON MARK W 14 BEAVER S F 1 31 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 ' SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA 01929 16_0173_0 16_0227 0 16_0223_0 LATAWIEC PAULINE F LAWSON BRUCE M A&N REAL ESTATE TRUST 17 BEAVER STREET 27 LEBLANC ROAD 7 PAULINE RD SALEM,MA 01970 PEABODY,MA 01960 DANVERS,MA 01923 - _- 16_0235_0 16_0167_0 16_0158_801 i PATTISON MARK W SIMPSON RUTH A POSTE STACY 65 CENTRE STREET 33 BEAVER STREET 12 FRANCIS STREET DANVERS,MA 01923 SALEM,MA 01970 I EVERETT,MA 02149 " I 7 16_0231_0 1 �� 16_0225_0 - 1 16_0158_802 -- ` ROSS RUSSELL R TUCKER ROBERT E CORLISS MICHAEL 20 BEAVER STREET 34 BEAVER STREET 41 BEAVER STREET U2 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 � i I 16_0171_0 - - --- 16_0166_0 -- —16 0222_0 f BURKE THOMAS W GREENWOOD LINDA KOHLOFER MERRILL B 23 BEAVER STREET I � 35 BEAVER STREET " 44 BEAVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 - SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 I kHisettes fabarl a paler ns Repliez a la hachure afin de v W.avery.corn Sens de UtHisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® � chargement reveler le rebord Pop-UpTM� 1-800-GO-AVERY � ` J Easy Peel®Labelsi ♦ Bend along line to it 1 AVERY® 5 Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM 16_0220_0 {, 16_0158_808� 16_0143_0 EASLEY ERIC i QUINN BARBARA J OLIVEIRA ERNESTO S 1458 SPOFFORD ROAD 130 BOSTON STREET U8 72 GROVE ST BOXFORD,MA 01921 1 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 r I 16_0234_0 1 16_0158_809 I 16_0142_0 MC SWIG GIN PETER M { MACHADOJENNIFER CORREIA JOSE JR { 21 LIBERTY STREET11 I 130 BOSTON STREET U9 73 GROVE ST I MIDDLETON,MA 01949 SALEM,MA 01970 I SALEM,MA 01970 16_0146_0 16_0372_0 16_0144_0 ' G&M KATIS REALTY TRUST NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC ETHAN REALTY TRUST 381 MAIN STREET 282 BENNINGTON STREET PO BOX 462 k ACTON,MA 01720 BOSTON,MA 02128 NORTH READING,MA 01864 16_0148_0 16_0242_1 1601410 j DIVISION 18 A O H CLUB INC HARMONY GROVE CORPORATION SILVA JOSE P 104 BOSTON ST 30 GROVE STREET 1i 1 75 GROVE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM MA 01970 SALEM MA 01970 I J r 16_0172_0 16_02420 i 16_0377_0 I I CHILDREN'S FRIEND FAM SERVICES HARMONY_ GROVE CORPORATION HARMONY GROVE CORP 11 110 BOSTON STREET 30 GROVE STREET 30 GROVE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0158_803 16_0238_0 �i 16_0239_0 I YOUNG JOHN D 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST,LLC MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC 126 BOSTON STREET U3 7 RANTOUL STREET ! P O BOX 388 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 BEVERLY,MA 01915 I 16_0158_804 16_0368_0SII 16_0378_0 1 THOMPSON CORA L ` P-MAC,LP HARMONY GROVE CORP 128 BOSTON STREET U4 I 74 GILCREST ROAD 30 GROVE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 LONDONDERRY,NH 03053 SALEM,MA 01970 J 16_0158_805 t �! 16_0237_0 r 16_0366_0 PRESSON PAMELA R `` MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC I JANKOWSKI ZYGMUNT 128 BOSTON STREET U5 PO BOX 388 119 MASON STREET SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 SALEM,MA 01970 JJ I 16 0158 806 16_0371_0 � � 16_0217_0 CHARTIER ELIZABETH ! PHILSON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SARKES DANIEL T 130 BOSTON STREET U6 1 P O BOX 5580 I 12 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 ( BEVERLY,MA 01915-0521 i SALEM,MA 01970 1i 16_0158_807 16_0236_0 �� 16_0216_0 — G HARRITY MAUREEN F MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC RAYMOND JAMES W f 130 BOSTON STREET U7 P O BOX 388 18 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 SALEM,MA 01970 I, Etiquettes faciles a paler Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin dei www.avery.com 1 I ® ® _ TM1-800-GO-AVERY Utilisez le abarit AVERY 5160 reveler le rebord Pop Up 9 � chargement � ` J Easy.Peel®Labels i ♦ Bend along line to ❑ AVERY0 5960TM ' " Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ® 1 �I -- Ir 16_0376_0 MIRANDA REALTY TRUST 2SILVER SI SALEM,MA 01970 I I' 16_0219_0 FL ORES PAUL R 6 SILVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 16_0218_0 PLORES PAUL �� ! 6 SILVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 i r i I i I I ' I II '� i I I 1 ii Eti uetbes faciles 3 peler � Re liez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com � Sens de i � P i Y i Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® chargement reveler le rebord Pop-UpTM j 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 �, 0 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD a�u4tr-s aL n� C �s'�1 flw�s Plwn 8t-'k-s City of Salem Planning Board 978-619-5685 Will hold a continued public hearing at the request of MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC for Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE RD and 60 & 64 GROVE ST (Map 16, Lots 236, 237 & 239), Salem MA. Site plan has been revised to include two additional parcels, 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE RD (Map 16, Lots 377 & 378), with no change to the number of proposed residential units. The continued public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning& Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo Chair Salem News, Oct. 4 & 11, 2012 t20 \VASHING'fON S I'RF. .'f, SALEM, idASSACHUSETFS 01970 ' PHONE 97S.619.5685 FAX 97$.740.0404 ' SvAVAVSrAL.EV4.COdd CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD City of Salem Planning Board 978-619-5685 Will hold a continued public hearing at the request of MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC for Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE RD and 60 &64 GROVE ST(Map 16, Lots 236, 237 & 239), Salem MA. Site plan has been revised to include two additional parcels, 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE RD (Map 16, Lots 377 & 378), with no change to the number of proposed residential units. The continued public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo Chair Salem News, Oct. 4 & 11, 2012 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWWSALEM.COM Ii AN3AV-O9-O08-L i w,dn-dod Piogai 9110laA,?J luawa6jeq) O9L5 A83AV l!�e e6 a zas! 1 -� worAaanE'nnnnnn i ap w;e amy�ey el a zalltlay ap sua5 ® ® q ! !lL aa!ad it saN:)e}sapanb!1; 16_0233 801 Ib 02 to n SACCO PAA1E1 A UI SIEI,Li SIIUV',N I! IL'26 q 10 WEAVE feiuI BeI:KI. ,I,Aall'S -v SA ,MIA 01970 24 HEAVER S IRELT SALEM.MA 01971, - 36 NI`AV'ER J Itl-.ICI' SALILL MA 0197(' I' I,'fi_0233_302IOHNSO oo n N HI LDhLAM1 li:1RC 16 O165 0 POB 2431 KICAUSE I1A4011.1) S VIDENCE,R1 02 35"FAVER K S'f 360 SALEM,hl,VIA 019711 i 37 BEAVER li ti LRGG'I- SAI_E:VL MA 01970 16_0233_803 . .__ 1 ,JOHNSON KEVIN IV - Ifi 0229 0 Ifi 112'4 0 MF L - I'O 13OX 2431 BASI I FLORE 28 BE:AA'LR.SI f ONLE7 I HAIRS L PROVIDENCE Rf-62 00 ¢BEAM R S'LRI-IfI SALI'rol.Ai.4 (111170 , I6 0233_804 TJ 16_0 1 69 0 IG 1,16.1 0 8200JONES BRA LOAN-M3'O Cf7RP H1N fLS 1121 \NL\I=ILLOS { 8200 JONES BRANCH DR iM ARCNAiVD R:AYMOND,bI ,VICLEAN;Vi1 22102- BL:\VI3R S3 RITE"I 3110 SALEM,hIA 019711 j ' ES'fSALfM,MIA 0 191 } 16_0174 0 IG 0223 0 DIVISION 18 A O I-1 CLUB INC I6 113So 0 104 BOS JON ST MT'-SA:VFR PAI VI r SALEM MA 01970 OBIA VGIt iI"KEIi'f h5CENIRESI RFI-I SALFNL M.A 01970 D:A,NVI:RS.MA (11')23 6_0232 0 _. MYERS PA I'RICIA Ifi 6_01(0163 11\MYON NIL BOLAS Ifi 03S4 0 14 BEAVER SI1 PAWSON MARK \V 31 BL.AVER SI'It N"E'1' SALEFI,MA 01970 - 63CEN"IRE S'fRLEL YAu:nq.Mn 01970 DANVERS.MA n r�r- o1q z I � 16_0173_0 Ifi 0 7 0 If 0 1 L ShCaYu LAReAU 1 AAASM HR I i( I- I1 ,A1 - 17131AVERSIREE-E7A&-N REAL SiII'E'fRU.SI- SVLLM,MA 01970 lIBLAN( I_A I'I IVE RD L.A li .AI:\ 019id1 DlN\'IRN,M\ 0 'd'3 I � 1602350 0 IC 01l- u .A'I IISON MARK W SMI II) 11 0155 :101 65CL N'LRE S LREE.L -N Ru I i A 1 1,N I$LACY DANVCRS,MA 01933 3, BVAk Fit 5'I KElf1" 12 FRANCIS STRI.h"I SALEM.MA 019 i0 EVIRE'1'"I.MA 1,)I'Ig 16_023 0 16 1)224 0 ILOSS RUSSELL R I I C KI_K R (101 58 S02 20 BL 1I ER S-IREF,'f ItOB t OR11SS f lit ll. SVLF.M ,VIA 01970 11 S'1 RC JI 141-AYI_It SIIUI�T U' —m MA 01970 S:ALFM..MA 019711 Ifi III 1 0 10 Oit0 0 B[RKI I NOMAS W - l W n u GREENWOOD i-IVDA 33LKull m LR iAIERRHT B BEAVER EET ,5 BEAVER SfRFEI SALEM,SIA 011)7D SALEM,.M A 019'11 I;BEAVER ST14:1'I' .NALEM„ALA 01977 Tw1O965 pgrJgnd ma6P3 dH-dod asodxa jaded paa;, / p09L5 aleldwal 0Aj9AV asO l 01 aull 6uole ouaa i AL3AV-09-008-L 'i wjd0-dod pjogaj aI JaJ9A9J ;uawa6jeyp ( 09L5 A83�V�!ae e6 a zas! I i - worAjane'AAM n ap suas ® ® q ! {iL ap u1;e ajny�ey e!a za!IdaB is ad a 581!:)ei Se apb! 16 0220 0 f VSI 13Y ERIC 16 WS 803 11 0242 WiB SPOFFORD ROAD YOUNG JOI-IND IIA ItbIONY GRM 1:CORPORA 1 i(R, BOXFORD,MA 01921 126 BOSTON SIRI-1-I'U} e0 G12ObF Slit Fl,'f SALBiI-M:A 01970 SALFTI.MLA 019711 16 0239_0 MCSRIGGIN PI:HUM 16 01"8_v04 16 0242 0 21 L1BLRIY STRUT IHOMPSON CORA IIARMON) GROA'I'.COIt POR�IIm. MIDDLE TON.MA (11949 129ROSIU LFR -UJ 11 GR(1AL NIIiL'I:I 5A M A 01970 SAI-EM,AIA 01970 i 1 16 0200 0 IC OI iB 811 I, MIILARD LISA 121 DICKERSON RD _ PRFSSONI ANIILAIt q)C kUVl:S'fRP.I`I'It 6,AI_ELI.IJ.t- WAVERLY,NY 14892 128 BO)I-ON S'1'RH'I U5 7RAN'10111 SR I'_I:'1" SALE,NI,:MA 01970 1 BIYERLY,,VLA 0191i 16 0194 801 HYDI.E 16_01$8 606 Ifi (1368.0 7x BEAVER S7REET lR S I E'fH CHARIIERELIZABFIll - UI 130 BOSTON 5'I-Kf.E'f U6 SALEM.MA 01970 SALEM,NIA 01970 74 GILCRFSF _ LC7ND( :ItItY'.NH IliOti I 6_0 1)9 802 16 0158 807 B1 N1 AIIN RANDALL KJR BARRLLY MAURI'EN F 160237 0 78R BEA VE 6ALIi\4.MA 01970 R S PREET U'_ %'RAI PItp1LC"P iM ANA(I MEN 1.1.1 C 130 BO5 CON S I it[F.I'U7 VO BOX 388 1 SALEM,MA 01970 HIiVBRLY,bL 11I9Ii 1( 0119 803 ENC 1;ARRY 1R 16 01 8 808 Ifi JIM 11 ARA J I IIIL)ON Llbt l"f F:D I'.VCI♦ERSIIII' 78R HE.AVf:R J IQUINN BARBARA U3 130 BOSTON STRFk I'U8 S SALEM-NIA 01970 SALEbI,AIA 01970 P U BOX 5Sg0 ' H@Viii(LY'.AAA 111V1 i-Oi21 i i i I6_0 90 ,404 16 0158 809 - I LNG I'\RRY JR - ❑ 0236 0 78R fW AVER SI REST U3 MACH A 130 BOSTON DO II NNIFER Ail(M I'12QIFCf MI A.VAGLAI IiF"I I 1 C P O 8OS 388 1 SA LE:bI.MA 01970 S I RIFF I L'9 SALE-Al.MA 01`)7b � I I Of A9SRLY-MU 0140 16 01 I1, 0 16-0374.0 +ti. N"l, Leo bA, ux D yI 6,01 R,F1Is RL ALIY'I RUST PI,ABoY A-FRA N ror e snoP o113_n 3S1 ALAIN STILI:ET 1385 HANCOI_1.S M:l 1 C)I IbHll<A I'RSES TV ti M 10\,AIA 01720 -- _(i RliVE if QI1IN(JY.ML7' A (11169 FALI'M.,ALA i114'ii 16 01C: 0 .261111400 DIVISION 18 A O H CLUB INC - - IC_ )M 0 MASS BAY TRANS,AUTHORITY CVRIt PIA JOSI'11< 104 BOLTON 01 P O BOX 84514_' S.{LE.AL b1A 01970 BOSTON.MA 022TQIiOVE S'f H4-i N_2 SALIiJI.MA 1119'0 16 0 i 16 03 11 CllitD h F 11 I NN'S ltll. FAM SERVICES It 0141 0 IIOH SRIREF N 282 BF N N ING NOR I I I RIVER C ANAL LLC kI HAN RF.AI:I1' {'RUT TUN S I R CTI SAL !'U BOX 462 E`. 0197 .,NLA (1 BOSTON',MA 117123 NOR'III IWAIlIX,1.Ai.A Ill°•d Tw1096S .>41213 d0-dod asodxa jaded Paa; ®09L5 a;eldwal®AjaAV as0 1 I o3 awl Buole puaa ® puieng nnege I ��I Use Avery Template 5160® � Feed Paper exposeose Pop-Up Edge" � � V AVERYO s960'r- ry 'V bbS 0L6r0 VIN ..tIIVS 'l� v�wv� q � pl'� .13BTLI,S?I:i SIS zz J.SANJ AAARAN N Mi, `iJVf ,{3vi l �11' 1.I� l,n ' AS ]r'r-G�G 01 n t i:0 91 .{/ N r, l,y� (25-5-C -906L0 N610 VlY 1IFS J.EIFMBJJN !.t I IS Oz ✓✓ SV1011OIA -AVW QS�S XWlr"loi V1^ID� 0 '091 shblo -VN `7Pnzl�ys � °961(0 rH �C�o�„-rJ syr -;yvvN1/ bbf _i5 Q� -. tT __js„) I C-Ir-rd -co Ot610 VIN'-!y_M'S U Js :uvIISz "_js,�JI �-yi SH irv.�l"}I .ISnN.L Allv9a )IIN i 09610 j/N '�^ P9610 t/1/ (rd ° `1i0Td 06610 VrN'INa1VS 'i Al-il { -i-'C z°� wS'lJ'(ro Q-�� IS NFL•:IIS NI 6 M S31 N'VI 0Vl rf\AVII rj orn5 ��Ywrod .1i 91 01610 Vrv'Ia91VS o161n YIVN31Ns 1IiiN15 VINAIS9 J.6 N<1.11-Irs Ll 11 -If lVd_SM10l9 J.IAINV0 S:'N1Ivs f1 X17() 91 nCI CII 91 41oLIBd 0039 M? 0d 01610 A'IN IN9lV5 01610 VN'1A711VS �yyp� IA,' O)J .LTM.1's>GIKIIS9 I ITS,NOSY iN 611 j c� J N 1f1Vd C_aNO1J INMN IIINOAZ INSOAN 777 tr� I�rQ 0l,1z0 91 V 9vN 91 (>_410 _vVJ OLOIO Vla'IVNIvs 01610 VA 1 nvS t Tvoj8 05 S J. NJ IN0c ' S 139N,1 S I ( I)011 V IDN07')OINOH7d dN071AONDAA , NNVI-I � N-d d7 -Veoti 11zu a1 a xL[n 91 � f 016IO VIa INa1VS 1610 VN AINAA'lH yq bO(f1.1ti 11i:vIIS OC S� �OFOd 1 I� U fVIHJ.N II(7>IDIN JIlJN3W]9t'VVIAJ.J71() 7l VMV loI IIzO 91 0 6'.LU 91 , Z�$10 t�W fll;-y 'tnpN , 1 u,610 V'Po IV9IVS 01610 YIN-Ie�rIVS ISNeA_INsr 13MU.SRAMO01, 1 svkollJ.N_(INVAMYN' 0-111-091 INO)BAONDA=WN)WH , (1tttn 91 1 09b10 �W r��o�7� i OLelo VIe INa1VS 01610 VIVIN9-X's +S svllo� ST .11KIN'isNaAIJSez JaaN1.S'dnoNosl 051NVW IINNV NIOfIVf d HFOf VA_11s n- 1zn 91 a!: In 91 ' I Itiquettes faciles a peler i Sens Itilisez le gabarit AVERY651600 de Repliez A la hachure afin dei www.avery.com rMler le rebord Po U r^^ ' ' _ J chargement P- P � 1-800-GO-AVERY � Easy Peel®Labels I! A ® Bend along line to Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ❑ AVERVO 5960T- A 1 Medina A. J. & A. B. Trustees. Bina A. J. & A. B. Trustees � 27 Howley Street Merl a A. J. & A. B. Trustees Peabody, MA 01960 2 Howley Street 27 H wley Street Pe ody, MA 01960 Peab Y, MA 01960 A &A Howely Street Realty Trust A & A owely Street Realty Trust' A &A Ho ely Street Realty Trust Medina Augustine/Anna Trustees Medina ugustine/Anna Trustees; Medina Au ustinelAnna Trustees 78 East Mountain Avenue 78 East ountain Avenue i Revere, MA 02151 Revere, 02in 78 East Mo tain Avenue Revere, MA 2151 50 Grove Street Real Est, LLC 50 Grove Str t Real Est, LLC 50 Grove Street eal Est LLC 7 Rantoul Street 7 Rantoul Stre Beverly, MA 01915 Bevedy, MS 01 15 7 Rantoul Street Beverly, MA 0191 P1 0 a1 aPlanning Board City of Peabody Pla ing Board City of Peabody Plan 'ng Board y Peabody City Hall Peabody City Hall 24 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 24 Lowell Street 24 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Peabody, MA 01960 \ i i i i I i I i I I , i I k1cluettes facileseler Iltilicnz to nahM.rt AP cove clan® i Sens de Repliez la hachure afin dei www.avery.com CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION OF ABUTTERS AND "PARTIES IN INTEREST" BOARD/COMMISSION: Planning Board PROJECT SITE: 1 Harmony Grove Rd. (16_0377_0) 3 Harmony Grove Rd. (16 0239_0) 5 Harmony Grove Rd. (16_0378_0) 60 Grove St. (16_0237_0) 64 Grove St. (16_0236_0) DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT: Parties in Interest: The applicant Abutters Owners of land opposite any street or way Abutters within 300 feet Planning boards of abutting cities and towns This is to certify that the time of the last assessment for taxation made by the City of Salem, the names and addresses of those listed on the attached sheets are "parties in interest" (as defined by Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A, Section 11) to the parcel(s) of land listed above as the project site. Assessor's Signature: "1y Date: Number of initialed pages attached: Once Certified,Return to: Danielle McKnight Department of Planning and Community Development r Page 1 of 1 �„-.,�- �. Property Viewer !dome,7the Cty''�f,Salem assachuseds e a r New Property Search Property Record Card AHELP -- -- �,�- � PropertylD 16 0378_0 664 feet Address 5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD -- Owner HARMONY GROVE CORP Q'a / Property ID 16_0233 BOt PEABODY . f Address 10 BEAVER STREET U1 Owner SACCO PAMELA Property ID 16_0233_802 Address 10 BEAVER STREET U2 Owner JOHNSON KEVIN o Jj, Property ID 16_0233_803 Address 10 BEAVER STREET U3 — Owner JOHNSON KEVIN W - O - � ,s _ Property ID 16_0233_804 Address 10 BEAVER STREET U4 o ' ' \ Owner FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP • - p \ Property ID 16_0174 0 Address 13 BEAVER STREET Searchp Use Add/Remove B Adder C Abutter 0 e Distance -50 "ft Parcels tool to Parcels ����a Q / — --' Q Remove 15 Target Parcels . ,fit o a�,1ay —Mailing labal a Expop_,j ElAvaaavftivvv0 Scali 664 " If Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street,Salem,MA 01970 Phone:978-745-9595 City Hall Hours of Operation:Monday,Tuesday&Wednesday 8AM-4PM Thursday8AM-7PM Frei.12PM Site designed by specs, �J r � `M16 0233 801 16_0230_0 16 0226 0 SACCO PAMELA P� DEMEULE SHAWN / BURKEJAMES A / 10 BEAVERS UI ''1 SCtCKCJOh e 24 BEAVER STREET V 36 BC:AVISR S"fI21:IST V SA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 Peab94y t-4 - _. __ ___- o1 CI 6q---- _ 16_0233_802 l0 sec lel SY 16 0170_0 / 16_0165 0 .IOFINSO IN FELDMAN MARC �/ KRAUSE TIMOTIIY S PO 2431 4.02 25 BEAVER S'f 37 BEAVER STREE"F GVIDENCE,RI 0286039 a'�1Aw'1iC SALEM, LEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 ay 004T- 16_0233_803 16_0229_0 _ 16_0224_0 JOHNSON KEVIN W �� BASH FLORENCE L CON'LF:Y JAMES F P O BOX 243 28 BEAVER ST 3S BEAVER STREEI PR _ CE,RI 02860 a 01 On;a% SALEM.MA 01970 SALEM.MA 01970 Qlev;� pr.ce � Qaq._o.4�3Sso 16_0233_804 16_0169_0 / 16 01640 - FEDERAL HOME R IG CORP HANTzlS TRIANTAFILLOS .V/ MARCH_AND RAYMOND VI 820010 ANCH DR % BeKyt.� SA 29 BEAVER STREET 39 BEAVER SI' N,VA 22102-3110 R��y SALEM,MA 01970 1 SALEM MA 01970 Frewr.t�'+ Raw.a.._ 'rc 399 Gl ld►wa: c G0.v� NaF1i"1s1�e�, Ha -01cl4 16_0174_0 16_0228_0 1603800 DIVISION 18 A 0 H CLUB INC MESA ANA PA ITISON MARK W 104 BOSTON ST 30 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE STREET" SALEM,MA 01970 / SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA 01923 16_0232_0 16_0168_0 16_0384_0 MYERS PATRICIAWILLIAMSON NICHOLAS S / PATTISON MARK W 14 BEAVER ST V/ 31 BEAVER STREET V 65 CENTRE S I'12FE"I SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 j DANVERS,MA 0 o Iq�3 16 0173_0 t. QAegy 7 Qck1-IM 16_0227_0 16 0= 0 SRC F LAWSON'BRUCE M ^ S{ A R N REAL TSTA 1 E TRUST / 17 BEAVER STREET 27 LEB R AD 5 Gc1V1%S 7 PAULINE RD SALEM,MA 01970 vjiODY,MA 01960 DANVERS,MA 01953 .. .. . ------- _ olq ` o 16_0235_0 1601670 - I6 OUS 801 PATTISON MARK W / SIMPSON RUT]I A POS I E S'ACY 65 CENTRE STREET V 33 BEAVER S'1 RLET ✓ 12 FRANCIS STREET DANVERS,MA 01923 SALEM,MA 01970 EVERE'FT,MA 02149 16_0231_0 16 0225_0 SA16 0158_802 ROSS RUSSELL TUCKER BOBER FE ��a.�COR LISS MICIIAFL 20 BEAVER STREET 34 BEAV ET' ` y1 (� SCO a 41 BEAVER STREET U2 SALEM,MA 01970 ,MA 01970 1 1 SALEM_MA 01970 �ay�rh; 11, %, a OMA 16_0171_0 16_0166_0 16_0222 0 BURKE THOMAS W ✓ GREENWOOD LINDA / KOIILOFER MERRILL 13 23 BEAVER STREET 35 BEAVER STREE"1' v ' 44 BEAVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALENI,MA 01970 16 0220 0 / 16_0158_803 16_0242_1 / EASLEY ERIC V YOUNG JOHN / i HARMONY GROVE CORPORA] ON V 145B SPOFFORD ROAD 126 BOSTON STREET U3 V ' 30 GROVE STREF I BOXFORD,MA 01921 SALEM,MA 01970 - SALEM,MA 01970 0.l cwt Owl e - 16 0234 0 16 0158 804 a 1 16 0242 0 MCSWIGGIN PETER M THOMPSON CORAL I HARMONY GROVFCORPORAIION i 21 LIBERTY STREET 128 LOST ET U4 9 30 GROV E Sl REE I MIDDLETON,MA 01949 S ,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 M Ca Ear.► H cr ,__— __.___ _ ___ ',.__.._____ __ _ . _ o a tss- ._ 160200_0', 16_0158_805 16_023S 0 MILLARD LISA / PRESSON PAMELA 50GROVESTREf I REALESI',LLC 121 DICKERSON RD V 128 BOSTON S'PREET U5 ✓ - 7 RANTOUL S I KEE F J WAVERLY,NY 14892 ',. SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 16_0199_801 16_0158_806 16 0368_0 Q HYDE FLIZA13E"FH CHARTIER ELIZABETH ✓ P MAC.LP S Q v� 41 78 BEAVER STREET UI VVV 130 BOSTON STREE"f U6 74 GILCREST D SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 LO LRRY,NH 03053 Sm 1 evn M a• 019'10 16_0199_802 16_0158_807 16_0237_0 BENJAMIN RANDALL KJR ✓ FIARRITY MAUREEN F // MRM PROTECT\7ANAGEM F.NI',L LC. 78R BEAVER STREG'I'U2 ',, 130 BOSTON STREET U7 VVV PO BOX 388 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 3 BEVERLY,MA 01915 / } V 16_0199_80316_0158_808 16_0371_0 ENG HARRY JR QUINN BARBARA J PHILSON LIMITED PAN FNERSFI IP / 78R BEAVER ST U3 130 BOSTON STREET'U8 P 0 BOX 9580 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915-0521 16_0199_804 16_0158_809 / - 16 02;6_0 ENG HARRY JR MACHADO JENNIFER V M RM I'RO.I ECT MANAGIiMIiN'I,LLC 78R BEAVER STREET U3 130 BOSTON STREET U9 P 0 BOX 388 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVE.RLY,M.A 01915 16_0146_0 16_0374_0 16 0143_0 G&M KATIS REALTY TRUST / PEABODY RA/STOP&SHOP Q4 t 0. i OLR I;IRA ERNI-SIO S V/381 MAIN STREET V 1385 HANCOCK STREE"f 72 GROVE ST ACTON,MA 01720 QUINCY,MA 02169 ���/// SALEM,MA 01970 __--- ----- ---------Deck160148 0 26 0040 0 i 16_0142_0 DIVISION 18 A O 11 CLUB INC MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY 3 CORREIA JOSE JR 104 BOSTON STP O BOX 845142 73 GROVE ST SALEM,MA 01970 v/ BOSTON,MA 02284-5142SA1-EM,MA 01970 I 0172_0 V/ 16 0372_0 16_0144_0 ' CHILDREN'S FRIEND FAM SERVICES NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC / F171 IAN RI LTI"I'12US"f 110 BOSTON STREET 282 HENNING FON STREET v PO BOX 462 SALEM,MA 01970 - BOSTON,MA 02128 NORTH READING,MA 01864 I 16_0141_0 16_0213_0 SILVA JOSI?F / JABOIN ANNE MARISE 75 GROVE STREET ✓ - 26 SILVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0377_0 16_0212_0 HARMONY GROVE CORP NISWANDER THOMAS L 30 GROVE STREET '/ 28 SILVER S'I" SAL13M,MA 01970 v SALBM,MA 01970 3 16 0S9 0 16_0211_801 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC NIGRO CYNTHIA P 0 BOX 388 / 30 SILVER ST U30A BEVERLY,MA 01915 V SALEM,MA 01970 - 16 0378 0 16_0211_802 HARMONY GROVE CORP FEBONIO GEORGE V 30 GROVE STREET 30 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 ✓ SALEM,MA 01970 16 0366 0 16_0219_0 JANKOWSKI ZYGMUN'T FLORES PAUL R 119 MASON STREET 6SILVER STREET SALLNI,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0317 0 16_0218_0 SARKES DANIEL T / FEORES PAUL R 12 SILVER ST �/ 6SILVER STREET' SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16 0216 0 RAYMOND JAMES W 18 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 160376_0 MIRANDA REALTY TRUST 2 SILVIFIR ST SALEM.MA 01970 V 16 02150 ROWF_NICHOLAS : 20 SILVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 16 0214 0 JACK SHACK REAL'CY TRUST 22 SILVI'R STREET - SALT M,MA 01970 CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION OF ABUTTERS AND "PARTIES IN INTEREST" BOARD/COMMISSION: Planning Board PROJECT SITE: 1 Harmony Grove Rd. (16_0377_0) 3 Harmony Grove Rd. (16_0239_0) 5 Harmony Grove Rd. (16_0378_0) 60 Grove St. (16_0237_0) 64 Grove St. (160236_0) DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT: Parties in Interest: The applicant Abutters Owners of land opposite any street or way Abutters within 300 feet Planning boards of abutting cities and towns This is to certify that the time of the last assessment for taxation made by the City of Salem, the names and addresses of those listed on the attached sheets are "parties in interest" (as defined by Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A, Section 11) to the parcel(s) of land listed above as the project site. Assessor's Signature: Date: Number of initialed pages attached: Once Certified, Return to: Danielle McKnight Department of Planning and Community Development Page 1 of 1 —"- m Property- Viewer Welrnrne fo Hie_Gity'o'fSalemauYlassachuseris ea MU New Property Search Property Record Card A HELP Property ID 16_0378_0 �- Address 5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 864 feet Owner HARMONY GROVE CORP Property ID 16_0233_801 P FIBODY`. Address 10 BEAVER STREET U1 Owner SACCO PAMELA Property ID 160233_802 Address 10 BEAVER STREET U2 Owner JOHNSON KEVIN Property ID 16 0233 803 o _ _ � � Address 10 BEAVER STREET U3 Owner JOHNSON KEVIN W Property ID 16_0233_804 Address 10 BEAVER STREET U4 Owner FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP Property ID 16_0174_0 Address 13 BEAVER STREET - ° Search Use Atltl/Remove :>Atltl CQ Abutter 0 Distance 50 It Parcels tool to Parcels o Q t!?Remove A Target Parcels ® Q • _ + � L—Mailing_Labels_ail Exportal 6= Eyi ❑� wvaL'lavv� 'o © �� ® Scalel"= 664 ft Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street,Salem,MA 01970 Phone:978-745-9595 City Hall Hours of Operation:Monday,Tuesday 8 Wednesday BAM-4PM Thursday BAM-7PM Friday BAM-12PM SAe designed by Appose 16_0233_801 _ 16 0230_0 16_0226_0 SACCO PAMELA DEMEULE SHAWN BURKEJAMESA 10 BEAVE EET UI 24 BEAVER SFREET 36 BEAVER S'FREIi:I SA ,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_802 16 0170 0 16 0165 0 JOHNSON IN FELDMAN MARC KRA USIi'I'IMOTHY S POB 2431 25 BEAVER ST 37 BEAVER STREET VIDENCE,R1 02860 �,, SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_803 160229 0 160224_0 JOHNSON KEVIN W BASH FLORENCE L CON-LEY JAMES F P0BOX 2431 28BEAVER ST - 38BFAVFR S I RI'BT PROVIDENCE 2860 SALEM,MA 01970 - SALEM,MA 01970 16 0233 804 16_0169_0 16_0164_0 FEDERAL HOME LO TG CORP HANTZIS TRIANTAFILLOS MARCHAND RAYMOND M 8200JONESB CH 29 BEAVER STREET ' 39BEAVER ST MCLE A 22102-3110 SALEM,MA 01170 SALEM,MA 01970 i f 16_01740 - 16_0228_0 - 16_0380 0 - DIVISION_ 18 A O 11 CLUB INC - MESA ANA PX71 IISON MARK\V 104 BOSTON ST 30 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE S IREL I' SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA 01923 16_0232_0 16_0168_0 1603840 MYERS PATRICIA WILLIAMSON NICHOLAS S PATTISON MARK W 14BEAVERST - 31 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS.MA ftt- m1q 13 16_0173_0 1602270 16 0223 0 I,—A+* E+'ovl:.e-F JALICLYN LARCAD LAWSON BRUCE M A S N REAL ESTATE TRUST 17 BEAVER STREET 27 LEBLANC 7 PAULINE RD SALEM,MA 01970 PEAB ,MA 01960 DANVERS,MA 01923 16_0235_0 �� 16_0167_0 - I6_015R_801 PATTISON MARK W SIMPSON RUTH A POSTE STACY 65 CENTRE STREET 33 BEAVER STREET - 12 FRANCIS STREET DANVERS,MA 01923 SALEM,MA 01970 : EVERETT,MA 02149 - 16 0231 0 16 0225 0 16 01iS 802 20 BEAVER STREET 34 BEA STREET ' 41 BEAVER S'I'RCG'1'U2 SALEM,MA 01970 M.MA 01970 SALEM.MA 01970 16_0171_0 ��� 16_0166_0 16_0222_0 BURKE THOMAS W GREENWOOD LINDA KOHLOFER MERRILL B 23 BEAVER STREET 35 BEAVER STREET 44 HEAVER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0220_0 160158803 16_0242_1 EASLEY BRIO YOUNG JOHN D HARMONY GROVE CORPORATION 145B SPOFFORD ROAD 126 BOSTON STREET U3 30 GROVE STREET - BOXFORD,MA 01921 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 i 16_0234_01. 16_0158_804 16 0242_0 MCSWIGGIN PETER THOMPSON CORA HARMONY GROVE_CORPORATION 21 LIBERTY STREET 129 BOSTO L=EIU4 311 GROVE STRf IST M IDDLETON,MA 01949 SAL ,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0200_0 16 0158_805 16_0238_0 MILLARD LISA C 1, PRESSON PAMELA R 50 GROVE STREET REAL ES'CLLC 121 DICKERSON RD 128 BOSI"ON STREET U5 - 7 RANTOUL S'I REE'I WAVERLY,NY 14892 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 16_0199_801 _ 16 0158 806 16_0368_0 HYDE ELIZABETH CHARTIER ELILABEI"H I P-MAC,LP 78 BEAVER STREET UI 130 BOSTON S I REET U6 14 GILCREST SALEM,MA 01970 - SALEM,MA 01970 s L0NDQ RRY,NH 03053 16 0199 80216_0158_807 s 16_0237_0 BENJAMIN RANDALL KJR HARRIIV MAUREEN F MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT.LLC 78R BEAVER STREET U2 130 BOSTON STREET U7 PO BOX 388 SALEM,MA 01970 '.. SALEM,MA OI970 - BEVERLY,MA 01915 , 16_0199_803 16_0158_808 16_0371_0 ENG I1.\RRY JR QUINN BARBARA 1. PHILSON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 78R BEAVER ST U3 130 BOSTON SCREE;f U8 P O BOX 5580 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915-021 16 0199_804 16_0158_809 16 0236 0 ENG 1-IARRY JR MACHADO JENNIFER MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT 11 78R BEAVER STREET U3 130 BOSTON STREET U9 P O BOX 388 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 16 0146 0 16_0374_0 A-H-f:.4"A- 16_0143_0 G&M KATIS REALTY TRUST PEABODY RA/STOP&SHOP OLIVEIRA BRNESTO S 381 MAIN STREET 1385 HANCOCK SI KEET 72 GROVE s ACTON,MA 01720 QUINCY,MA 02169 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0148_0 26_0040_0 16_0142_0 DIVISION 18 A O H CLUB INC ',, MASS BAY TRANS Au DIORITY CORREIA JOSE.IR 104 BOSTON ST P 0 BOX 845142 73 GROVE ST SALEM,MA 01970 BOSTON,MA 022R4-5142 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0172_0 16_0372_0 160144_0 CHILDREN'S FRIEND FAM SERVICES NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC EI_I'IAN REALTY TRUST I10 BOSTON STREET 282 BENNING'[ON'STREET PO BOX 462 SALEM.MA 01970 BOSTON,MA 02128 NOR]H READING,MA 01864 16_01-11_0 16_0213_0 _ B!�.u.- LaJs,A SILVA JOSE F JABOIN ANNE MARISE 75 GROVE STREET '', 26 SILVER STREET zs C-I(w3S^}' SALEM.MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_03770 16_02 12 0 �0 } �� r IIARMO_NY GROVE CORP NISWANDER THOMAS L 30 GROVE STREET 28 SILVER Si jl onj,I„>a�n $�• SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 , Name h;UJ H& oIB32 16_0139_0 16_0211_801 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC NIGRO CYNTI'IIA 1 P O BOX 388 30 SILVER ST U30A ��JJ pp pp'�"�p BEVERLY,MA 01915 SALEM,MA 01970 ( (�ed-1-A HA- o-.-iSS 16 0378 0 1 16_0211_802 P-Hkc, LP HARMO_NY GROVE CORP FEBONIO GEORGE S'O gfooA S�. 30 GROVE STREET 30 SILVER ST SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 SatsM M� 019 p � UC 16 0366_0 ', 160219 0 JANKOWSKI ZYGMUNT FL_ORES PAUL At,, Lk MASON SIREET 6SILVER STREET CIO /�',wLk SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 Lt0.-t A-cw--i-.Y, Po &W &coo 1602170 16_0218_0 SARKESDANIELT 1, FLORES PAUL - - 12SILVI.RST ! 6SILVER S"FREEI' SALEM.MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 NI, 716 0216 0 Qamtla So.fw ', � M hay hB R, YMOND JAMES 18 SILVER ST -��1 SALEM,MA 01970 ',..., FXA-1�0 jJ N/F 0I %Uod-y� MA- 01960 16_0376_0 k.Q,v.A JOk�&�A 2�- F(Nwl-4j SF MIRANDA REALTY TRUST N'r�'^d`) A }A-d Tfud F.u3 2 SILVER ST to geav�( S�' - SALENI,iMA 01970 1 V7 3 9 4 /�tlw t 2# e, � body H.4 r�19 60 u1� 16_0'_15_0 ROWE NICHOLAS 20 SILVER STREET sALEnM,MAol97a ProvcQµ R, (Li 02906- 1SSD Sa hl/� oil 16 0214 0 to LA 4t'J j r--ifi -- -- - JACK SHACK REALTY TRUST 22 SIFfo0. K0.mt,q I VER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 '...',399 /r �!�:c &t- 1�{ Medina A. J. &A. B. Trustees dine A. J. &A. B. Trustees Merl a A. J. & A. B. Trustees 27 Howley Street 2 Howley Street 27 H wley Street Peabody, MA 01960 Pe ody, MA 01960 Peab y, MA 01960 A &A Howely Street Realty Trust A &A owely Street Realty Trust A &A Ho ely Street Realty Trust Medina Augustine/Anna Trustees Medina ugustine/Anna Trustees Medina Au ustine/Anna Trustees 78 East Mountain Avenue 78 East ountain Avenue 78 East Mo tain Avenue Revere, MA 02151 Revere, 02151 Revere, MA 2151 50 Grove Street Real Est, LLC 50 Grove Str t Real Est, LLC 50 Grove Street eal Est, LLC 7 Rantoul Street 7 Rantoul Stre 7 Rantoul Street Beverly, MA 01915 Beverly, MA 01 15 Beverly, MA 0191 ity o abody Planning Board City of Peabody Pla ing Board City of Peabody Plan 'ng Board Peabody i all Peabody City Hall Peabody City Hall 24 Lowell Street 24 Lowell Street 24 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Peabody, MA 01960 Peabody, MA 01960 �OFr� D} n�e�t �. cQeLtS ?�✓l � /0130) ❑ Abutter Notice OR* Notice of Decision Iblaile otice to aMur list certified by Assessor (Date• Initials: ) �Maile noti to the follo Planning Boards of abutting cities and towns (Date�� Initials Office of the Planning Board 22 Monument Avenue Swampscott, Massachusetts 01907 Peabody Planning Board Office of Community Development & Planning 24 Lowell Street Peabody, Massachusetts 01960 Lynn Planning Board 3 City Hall Square Lynn, Massachusetts 01901 Marblehead Planning Board Abbot Hall 188 Washington Street Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945 City of Beverly Planning Board 191 Cabot Street Beverly, Massachusetts 01915 Town of Danvers Planning Board 1 Sylvan Street Danvers, Massachusetts 01923 c ' CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Notice of Corrected Decision At a regularly scheduled meeting of the City of Salem Planning Board held on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313 at City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, Salem Massachusetts, the Planning Board voted on the following item: Petition of MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE RD and 60 &64 GROVE ST (Map 16, Lots 236, 237 & 239), Salem MA (redevelopment of the former site of Salem Oil & Grease factory), for Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Site plan was revised to include two additional parcels, 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE RD (Map 16, Lots 377 & 378), with no change to the number of proposed residential units. The proposed project includes construction of three multi-family residential buildings (total of 141 units), re-use of an existing 17,000 square foot commercial office building, and associated parking and landscaping. Decision: Approved Corrected decision filed with the City Clerk on October 25, 2012 This notice is being sent in compliance with the Massachusetts General laws, Chapter 40A, Section 9 and does not require action by the recipient. Appeals, if any, shall be made pursuant to Chapter 40A, Section 17, and shall be filed within 20 days from the date which the decision was filed with the City Clerk. it TSA � CITY OF SALEM 'y" � � e � PLANNING BOARD Notice of Corrected Decision At a regularly scheduled meeting of the City of Salem Planning Board held on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313 at City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, Salem Massachusetts, the Planning Board voted on the following item: Petition of MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE RD and 60 & 64 GROVE ST (Map 16, Lots 236, 237 & 239), Salem MA (redevelopment of the former site of Salem Oil & Grease factory), for Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Site plan was revised to include two additional parcels, 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE RD (Map 16, Lots 377 & 378), with no change to the number of proposed residential units. The proposed project includes construction of three multi-family residential total buildings g ( of 141 units re-use of an existing 17 00 g 0 square foot commercial office building, and associated parking and landscaping. Decision: Approved Corrected decision filed with the City Clerk on October 25, 2012 This notice is being sent in compliance with the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 9 and does not require action by the recipient. Appeals, if any, shall be made pursuant to Chapter 40A, Section 17, and shall be filed within 20 days from the date which the decision was filed with the City Clerk. Ifi 0233_801 Ifi 0230 0 I6 0226 0 SACCO PAMELA DEMEULF SHAWN BURKE J W ES,A IOBEAVE EETUI 24BEAVER SI HELI 36BFAVNKS I RI-I I' SA MA 01970 SALEM.MA 01970 SALENL MA 01970 16_0233_'02 16_0170_0 16_0165 0 JOHNSON IN FELDMAN MARC KRAUSFTIMO'PIfYS 1'O B 2431 25 BEAVER S 3713FAVl92 S'fRl',13f VIDENCE,RI 02860 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEiVI,6-IA 01970 16 0233 803 16_0229_0 16_0224_0 JOHNSON KEVIN W j BASH FLORENCE L CONLEY.IAMCS F P0BOX 2431 / : ISBFAVERSI 38 HEAVER SRII PROVI DENC�E-RJ-62860 SALEM,NLA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 16_0233_804 / 16_0169_0 16_0164_0 FEDERAL HOME LO N'MTG CORP IIANTZIS'IRIANTAFILLOS MARCI IAND RAYMOND M 3200 JONES-- rN DR 29 BEAVER S'I'REL I 39BIAVER SI MM�-,VA 2 2 102-3 110 SALEM,MA 019711 SALEM.MA 01970 16_0174_0 16 0228 0 16_0380_0 DIVISION 18 A O H CLUB INC MESA ANA PAI 1'ISON MARK VV 104 BOSTON ST - 30 BEAVER S ITiIT 1 65 CI''N I'BE STRIi EI SALEM,MA OI970 SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA 111923 16 0232 0 16 OI68 0 16_0384_0 MYERS PA'ERICIA WILLIAMSON NICHOLAS S PA'I I'ISON MARK W I4 BEAVER ST 31 BEAVER STREET 65 CENTRE STREICI' SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 DANVERS,MA t M l- *Iq Z3 16 0173 0 16_0'_'_7 0 16_0223_0 L `-F JACY,LYN Lp12ch� LA\VSUN BRU('I \I ASN REAL ESl�\'I I{TRUSI 17 BEAVER STREET 27 LEBLANC: 7PAULINE ILD SALEM,MA 01970 PEAR .MA 01960 DANVERS,MA 01923 16_0235_0 16_0167 0 16_11158 811 PAT'FISON MARK W SIMPSON RU'IIi A POST E S'1ACY 65 CENTRE STREET 33 BLAVLR SI REF31 R FRANCIS Sl RI`.121' DANVERS,MA 01923 SALEM.NIA 01970 EVFRIiI-I,MA 02119 16 0231 0 Ifi 02_) 0 Il 0118 X02 ROSS RUSSELL R I UCKER ROIL CORLISS%11C HAI L 0 BEAVER STREET 34BiA _ STREI1' 41 BIAAER S IRI.F I'U2 SALEM,MA 01970 ,SAC-Ni,MA 019711 SALLNE NLA 01970 16_0171_0 16_0166_0 [6_0222 0 BURKE THOMAS W GREENWOOD LINDA ROI ILOFER MERRILL B 23 BEAVER S'FREE'1' 35 BEAVER SI RIi 111' -14 BEAVER SI'M I SALENLMA 01970 SALEM,AIA 01970 SALI�AI'.MA 0100 16_02200 16_0158_803 16_(1242 1 EASLEY ERIC - YOUNG 101 IN D IIARiMONY GROV[i CORPORATW 1458 SPOFFORD ROAD 126 BOSTON STREET'U3 30 GROVE STREET" BOXFORD,MA 01921 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM.MA 01970 16_0234_0 16 0153_804 16 0242 0 MCSWIGGIN PETER M THOMPSON CORA HARMONY GROVE COR FFR,\'IIUN 21 LIBERTY S"FREET 128 BOSTO - EI:"F U4 30 GROVE STREP:( MIDDLETON,MA 01949 SA v ,MA 01970 SALEM.MA 01970 16_0200_0 160158805 16_0238_0 MILLARD LISAC PRES.SON PAMELA R 10 GROVL STRFLI"REAL I-S'I:LLC 121 DICKERSON RD 128 BOSTON SFREE I U5 7 RAN IOUL S'IRE[I" WAVERLY,NY 14892 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 16_0199_801 16 0158 806 1(+_03680 HYDE ELIZABETH CHARTIER ELIZABEI'll P-MAC,LP 78 BG,\VER STREET UI 130 BOSTON STREET U6 74 GH-CREST SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 _ L( .RRY NII03053 16 0199_802 160153_807 16 0237 0 BENJAMIN RANDALL K JR H_RRIIY MAUREEN F NIRM PROJECT MANAGEMENI'1D 78K BEAVER S'FREE'F U2 '.. 130 BOSI"ON S"FREE I U7 PO BOX 338 SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 BEVERLY,MA 01915 16 0199:\0199_803 16_0158_808 16_0371 0 ENG I IRRY JR QUINN BARBARA J PITILSON LIMI 11:1')PAR INERSI HP 7SR BI AVER SF U3 130 BOSTON S FREE,FUS P O BOX 5580 SALEIAI.MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 HEVERLY,MA 01915-0521 16 0199 804 16_0158 809 I6_0236_0 ENG I IARRY JR MACHADO JENNIFER ,MITI PROJECF pJ,AN AG EbIENI".L.L1' 7811 BEAVER S"FREE"FUG 130 BOSTON STREL'i,U9 P O IyOX 3118 SALEM,NIA 01970 SALEIM,MA 01970 BI?VI:RLY,M A 01915 16 01-16 0 _ 16 0374_0 .P -a �La.d�' OJ` I�YI 1601430 G&M K:\'HIS REALTY TRUST - PEABODY RA/S'fOI'.SI1OP OLIVA RA ERN FS 10 S 381 MAIN S'FRLET 1385 HANCOCK SPREE 71 GROVE SI ACTV�i.AIA 111720 - QGINGY,MA 02169 SALEiA'I,NLA 01070 16_0113_0 26_0040_0 16 0142_l0 DIVISIf)N IS A O H CLUB INC MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY CORREIA IOSE JR 104 BOSTON ST - P 0 BOX 445142 73 GROVE S SALEM,NIA 01970 BOSTON.MA 02284-5142 SALLM,MA 01970 _ 2 0 I 6 0114_0 16 01,2 11 1603720 CITII.')iI A'''S FRIEND FAM SERVICES NOR'FII RIVER CANAL LLC Ii'11IAN RF,AL'1'1 RUST 110 BI'STON S FREET 282 BENNING'I ON S'IRLEF 1'O BOR 462 _ SALI:?L.AIA 01970 1'3OST'ON,SMA 02128 NORTH READING.AIA 01861 16_01 1 I_II 16_0213_0 B f—� L 2.V S WI SILVA JI,)SE P .IABOIN ANNE MARISE zs 75 GROVE STREET '. 26 SILVER SIRLE' Co It�S S I- SALEM.NIA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 rt.lood-y, fA O196o 16 0377 0 16 0212 0 HARMONY GROVE CORP NISWANDER'II IOM AS L n 30 GROVE STREET 28 SILVI,IK S'I SALEM.MA 01970 SALEM,AirA 01970 11 Ly av2r {L:1�3 N/} ol`k32 19_0^_59_0 16_0211_801 MRNI PROJECT MANAGEMENT,LLC NIGROCYN'IIIIAJ P O BOX 388 30 SILVER s U30A ��)) pp '' BEVERLY,MA 01915 SALEM,NIA 01970 (lt�W��, f{�- OA.I,Sy 16 0378 0 16 0211 802 AR, L P IIARN141NY GROVE CORP FEBONIO GEORGEN S'O gro� �}. 30 GROVI.i STREET 30 SILVER S'f SALEM.MA 01970 SALEM,MA 01970 50.�sM, NA oIql�) 16 0.;66 0 16 0219 0 ; 0 ocyR-A LLC 119 NI:\5ON S I RrE'r 6SIILVER SI'RFFF Cl/u/ ,A7 - CA F'm. S.Lrv. SALEM,MA 01970 SALEM,NIA 01970 LAo, - A-tw--"'0-3 P� Byc 6500 Cp.tcic, PA a) -fols 16_0'17 0 16_0218 0 SAR K:!ti DANIEL T FLORES PAUL R 12 SIL.\I:R ST 6 SILVER STRELI' SALENLNIA 01970 SALENI.M,A 01970 'I6 07160 . . faMaap Sac6o /�J I -�rlyt� /}.g o-s r� RAYMOND JAMES W -}-J0.c.(G3 o+� A-u£. 18 S11,%EIL Sr SALENI,MA 01970 \HRA)-:IL\REAL'FYTRUS7 I-A-d lru3 j 2SILA!,IASI IO �eay.rr S� SALEM MA 01970 U-2- "," j rws L- 3 q 4 A-i-Lo ,A-.- /#,,.e. Mid oligo 11�6lif1zod, MA olgvs' 16_0'1 Il 10k J RO%%1 MCHOLAS o /' 20511"\-1�:It SIRELf 19- loloM1;p..l R�. SO 1-a J' �✓.e. SALE\i,NIA 01970 Prov�JAti LL, �1 O1g06- 1sSD Mf� oil-1-0 1601; II t0 gco-.� SI-. Vy P-tatU� j rwtY .IACK ',11,V K REALTY'FRUS"f }'ro„meq,�-4 �O.Mg �f. 22 S I I.1 T R S'I REG'r `� SALE_ '_\1A 01970 Sq9 A4a :c A, 1'1�l.lsl�e�, Mi} olgv� Merlina A. J. &A. B. Trustees Bina A. J. &A. B. Trustees Me\ee . J. &A. B. Trustees 27 Howley Street 2 Howley Street 27 y Street Peabody, MA 01960 Pe ody, MA 01960 Pe , MA 01960 A & A Howely Street Realty Trust A &A owely Street Realty Trust A & ely Street Realty Trust Merlina Augustine/Anna Trustees Medina ugustine/Anna Trustees Merustine/Anna Trustees 78 East Mountain Avenue 78 East ountain Avenue 78 o tain Avenue Revere, MA 02151 Revere, 02151 RevA 2151 50 Grove Street Real Est, LLC 50 Grove Str t Real Est, LLC 50 Street eal Est, LLC 7 Rantoul Street 7 Rantoul Stre 7 Rl StreetBeverly, MA 01915 Beverly, MA 01 15 BeA 0191ityoabodyPlanning Board City of Peabody Pla irig Board Cityabody Plan ng Board Peabody i all Peabody City Hall Peabody City Hall 24 Lowell Street 24 Lowell Street 24 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Peabody, MA 01960 Peabody, MA 01960 10 Beaver St unit 4 Realty Trust Robert Tucker Frometa Ramg Tr 1416 Broadway St 399 Atlantic Ave Haverhill, Ma 01832 .Marblehead, Ma 01945 Bruce Lawson Cora Thompson 25 Collins St 21 Atlantic Rd Peabody, Ma 01960 Medford, Ma 02155 Peabody RA LLC 27 Howley St c/o Ahold Firm. Serv/ Merlina, AJ &AB Trustees Lease accounting 27 Howley St PO box 6500 Peabody, Ma 01960 Corisle,. PA 17013 Pamela Sacco 17 Jackson Ave Peabody, Ma 01960 Kevin Johnson 10 Beaver St U2 Realty Trust 399 Atlantic Ave Marblehead, Ma 01945 P-Mac , LP 50 Broad Street Salem, Ma 01970 SESD-Nancy trust 50 Fort Ave Salem, Ma 01970 ❑ Abutter Notice OR W Notice of Decision I Nfaile¢¢,n, tice to ab t list certified by Assessor (Dated 4&1 Initials: ) Mailed notic to he foil y� e to Planning Boards of abutting cities and towns (DatInitialsk ); Office of the Planning Board 22 Monument Avenue Swampscott, Massachusetts 01907 Peabody Planning Board Office of Community Development & Planning 24 Lowell Street Peabody, Massachusetts 01960 Lynn Planning Board 3 City Hall Square Lynn, Massachusetts 01901 Marblehead Planning Board Abbot Hall 188 Washington Street Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945 City of Beverly Planning Board 191 Cabot Street Beverly, Massachusetts 01915 Town of Danvers Planning Board 1 Sylvan Street Danvers, Massachusetts 01923 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Notice of Decision At a regularly scheduled meeting of the City of Salem Planning Board held on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313 at City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, Salem Massachusetts, the Planning Board voted on the following item: Petition of MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC for the property located at 3 HARMONY GROVE RD and 60&64 GROVE ST (Map 16, Lots 236, 237 & 239), Salem MA (redevelopment of the former site of Salem Oil & Grease factory), for Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Site plan was revised to include two additional parcels, 1& 5 HARMONY GROVE RD (Map 16, Lots 377 & 378), with no change to the number of proposed residential units. The proposed project includes construction of three multi-family residential buildings (total of 141 units), re-use of an existing 17,000 square foot commercial office building, and associated parking and landscaping. Decision: Approved Filed with the City Clerk on October 23, 2012 This notice is being sent in compliance with the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 9 and does not require action by the recipient. Appeals, if any, shall be made pursuant to Chapter 40A, Section 17, and shall be filed within 20 days from the date which the decision was filed with the City Clerk. Ai13AV-09-008-L w.dO-dod p)oyaa al)alanaa luawa6)eya / .I woJ'WAB'Mly\ryi I ap tit amyaey el a zapdaa ap sues � ®09L5 gDAH3AV ijil al zasiy: T aalad g sane;sa3Lanbi r I( 023 vol SACC'OI AAIf LA 16 1}o 1i UI Aila I SII Avco u, 07_r 1 OBHrVAI 14E'P UI S.A IIi6AVI It SIIU11. BlltKl IAAII?.1 A_ .:AIA 111970 .,11.1:..1 L1 _Llit. AI It. l'I'Itl I. Aul 1'u S V L F.AI. \1,\ 111')':ri in 0233 802 JO11N`S(I N 16 0170 0 FI LD61 AN,MAR(. In (II6. 0 I'O 110X2431 L . L'KV IDI:NCf.RI 02860A \I .'f KR:\U.SI: 1'l,\I(1' IIS .AL1]LLM.Vi.Ai:4 UI107 17µL'A Vf-,R S"I'ItFI-Y Sm-I M,MA 019"0 Ifi 0233803 R IINSO_N KfVLN AV16 UT`+ 0 - - _. In Ii2_'.1 n I'b HON X411 � � ❑,ASI I II(Ili P. `8lit:AAIR.SI CU:SI_I' 1,AMI!S1 I'ItOVIDL NC@.RY'62%60 - SAI IRlit i:AAIR NIt IPI - S,AI. M,SLA II'9-0 Ifi 0213_814 FIiDERAL HOME L0,tN NJ r(;Cpltl' 16 016'1 O IIAAl%IS II?I,N'I':vll-w, I6 0164 0 R200.IONFSy}22102- DR V1A R CI I AiA1)ILV1'.AIU.VD AI ,A{CLEAN;VA ??102 !L MV9 R S 1970 iI lU .S.ALB,AI.hLA 01'170 19 RIS:IVL'It 5'I SAI_I!,AI„MA 11197u In 0174 0 DIVISION IS A()It CLUB INC 11102'Sn \IIS\ \A:\ I! 113X0 11 1ALF.).MA 01 AI'IISUi AI:AItK V1- S1LGM.:AIA 01970 30 111:AVldt 5111111 6>CI:N"1 It II.S I ItP.I:I S,\L6\L,\IA 019111 D,INVI'its.61:A nl�r: if,-02;2_0 \I}'I'.RS PA"I'RI('IA Ib_Olhx_n VVIILIA,MSON AI(lIO Ir 11 84 n NLEMVER S'!' L,\'SS I \1 I Ism:\I:\RK w -SALEM,MA 019711 11 IIf;ALl:\I.'Ii1t.I 97i'I' ' .:\LI?RI..\IA U19'.p 'tJ(f.Nlltli tillt P.I'T DANVERS.MA '1-'0 &11 z3 Ifi I)I73 1) C_" 0 + .1/ceLYA1 LARrnu Lykys ic111(1=('r.al 11 0_L3 u nlic\\ERsrallL 7 _ NRi:\Lr l \rn rRI S.ALCAI,AIA 019111 LI:111.ANC KUa7-. I'6',Af3jJ})1!,.A IIIHan ,AIJI. S, R 1.1D � U:1:\1'6xi\L\ J6 02"s o VA 11[SON MARK N' 16 016' u slml,1n:S Rl. t NVER .M,,\ EIT USI i.i1 \(.'1' DAAAI 125.:AI:A 111923 `µl AAT It (l KIii:'I' S,ALhlAI.AIA n197n I'i'If:A?CIS.S'I ItI.F I I6 0231 O It115S RLSSELI.R 16 11 2 7(l R I It Id Aim 'dµ[ AA'LR SI'RIi.P:I- ( )UISSVIlli-A61. S VLI AI MA 01970 SA It \y-P sI Iti-I:1 SA III'n0 41141 AV'I<illt l-I`I L" SAL 01.\1 1 06!'ri lit_01-1 0 lit RSI? 110.1\I:\. 1\' In lilon !1 GRI I AAl null I_I,NN 3v HLVI. A1R S l'),RI. .Alg ILl11'I'RMI I0MI.1 II iAl_L V. aIA OI970 � ltl I %1 SIRIi I.L 1:11.P.\ . \I:\ 1ilv:'u FI IIP.:\l r.t till:F! 1 �w,.O985 OO kUgAW I. 1 � wlahp3 dn-dod asodua radeA oaa4 --not[ imdm.. _ 4.— i AUAV-09-008-LI wadn-do 1 I d paogaJ a!Japnai ivawa6Je43 / ww•Aaane MAAm op up ain4ml el a za!!da8 ap suas I ®09LS®AWAV i!ALge6 al zesq!: b Ja!ad g s8113e;sa4pnb! I Ib 11L'fl U I .ASLI: ERIC 16 fIUS V73 Iv I fill SPOFFORD ROAD YOU,N( JUIIN 1) 0'4' - - IIOCFUIt NI D, A 01921 126 HOS i ON S'IRUU I.U 1 II ARMON1 GRUvL(012 PIIRVI It i'.. SA LISVI.pI;A (11970 711( ROFU SlRLI I 011",.) 16 u2}.1 0 V1C5VVI6GIN PH I ER M 160158_80W 'I MAIPSON('URA ly--- In 02.0 u >IDDLFt-O ,IRI:E'I . ILRMON) GR0% I t'Okl,fok LIIUULICI ON VI\ 01940 12x 11011�F.,' Gif f 111 hl.A 01970 10OROVES"1x1,151 ti,ALF:U.,A1A 019-(I 16 1200 0 VIILLARD LISA C 16 Of is S0 I IPI SSoN I A AII:I_:A R 16 021,Y O ISI ERLY,tNY l4X �O(Ilt(IVI;S"IR).1,1 Ium I>1 W\VGItLY,NY Wx92 1ALF%,.fA 01970f-f Ui - .: SALI`�AI,11:A 01070 7 RnN YUL'L S'I R I:kI ItEV'EIt L1',hLV u141i tfi 0199 xol IIYDI.FLIZAIii;,rII Ib_01ia SO6 CIIAIYI'OPR,FLIZ.4111f.1.1I Ifi 0}118 0 Sx LF.M. FR ti 1970 IJI 1',\I:\C.LI' S:ALL:.AL AVIA 014711 130 HOS 1OA S'IRFGf ILi SALEM.%U\ 11147I AGILL R6S'F LONDt $ItRY fill 0101; I6 O I9 x02 - BENL\AIIN RANDALL K.IR 16_0158_x07 I InRR ITY NIAL RI:IL\.F 16 0217 0 A BEAVER 1970 'C U2 'mal PROIP.c I :A I:ANA( 1,.W.N I'-II SALEM.NIA 0197(1 130 EM.%IA S 1x111'1'U7 SALEM.ALA 1)1971) 1.0 Iip.0 5x3 UUFIfItL1',xl:\ 0191 i 1601'M SOJ F\u 1 \it RY Jlt 1601 ix xox QUINN m.ARH,A I<V 1 1110,71 0 7YIt III.:A%Ut 11'UJ 1111.SUN LINIO4'D P AICI A" S VLI JAL NIA 111970 110EM.VUA SIJ70 U8 - 11:x51III' � SALEM.AIA 019711 III.)n0'A 55'x11 Ifl'VFRLY'...\1A 011)li-0i21 14 01911 SO.I UNO 11.ARRY llt 16_0158_809 blACH ADO11 AN SA EM.[it, 1970—T Ul 1IIYR IItAI IT"lf:("1 A1.A.vM;i1 :A❑-;A'1 I i SALEM.:AL1 01470 IJ(I HS)SIAU\1,A S 17o, I'L'9 .SALIiAI.AI:A 01170 I'0 IIU.0)8a' L I:LFAI iL11'IS RPALTY'IRL15I' 16_0774 0 k++A:. Pp.,!� Ltn. , f0k DwI 741 \L\ II OP-10 RASIA Stool , 014 0 \! 72 UI' YS IM 11 \1: (.K S IUfI'l, (ll.l\ :\ 10RA Fkh`:IO S' AC Itr ALA 017211 - "(;RUA'li S QIJINC A'.N:A 0_'164 S1L1[AL\I:\ ulo'ii 16 Of :'< 0 DIAIv'JN Ix A 0I CLUH INC 26 0040 if V1ASS 1141 I It VNSALA III(Mll Y I! nl1220 1(11 mi 5910A 5'f )full I A lom.. 114 J:ALI tI.\L\ 01970 PO BOX x45542 m(SION_,AIA 0228.1-3142 S+(ROC 5,ALL:ALDAL-A I i) 0' U CIIII -I 'J PR(1 N1)1':A:AI SF.RVICI!S In II a N'OR111slVIiR( AA In 011.1 n 1101 '1r, OPIlOEI' tL LLC I.I II\\RP::\LI1 ;Itlilf S.AI. - ALA UI'nll -'x-1114V LV(}IUA 511(151-:�I - L{(I,y I(I,y-vLv !I' .4 I'!1 If11Y Jn2 \I R.II1]It:\111.\:;. \I �1gx096S (DAU3A V `Yi/ � waa6P3 dfl-dod asodxa �� Jaded Paa4 __ _.... ,..mol c aA alduul _.(,�,,... - — —� �a-n���wr, 4-.4� ' «s vie �� �"`� (o�a-��(Z i �� ome��C�) 0.�o9r�s s�� I {—�cs� �� s�—s s v�) I I i AU3AV-09-008-1 Ir Md0-dod paogav al JalanaA luawa6leLp / tuorA.we-MMM 1 a ul ap suas 1 @09LS (gAUMV;uege6 al zoslll , p ;e amyaey el B zalldag aalad a salpe;sa33anb i 160 1 n A SILV1OINA B1�« La�s-1 .A 7nSl`P .LI101N.A N'NP:DLA HISG 7sGROVeSnaeEf 36SILVIFRSIItIa:f 25- Colt'as $+. S:AI_I°.AI_%IAA 01970 SAL'NI.NI:A 01910 M/} 01960 If, W770 It, u-1i10 ILAItNI(.?A'Y GROVl:(ORI' INISVA':ASUIR711UAI\s L ROL,v VL,-- (I R(A I'_,SI R f E 'N SILA 1IR SI - p p SAI..I:;.1_AIA 01970 SALILAI.NIA 1WI-U �d16 ploay-w c� S F. Ela�u hrlt7 MA old 3z 1611: ,-111 160211 801 Cola MIRM 'XVII(- I NI:AN;A(;Ii&II1N'I,LLC NIGRE)CYN1'I 11A r11Ii,.).: 3YS i11 51 L V L[It 5l'l'11 i:A ❑1ivF1:1_Y,NIA 0191; SALEM.NIA arnll f{tc��w�f, 02-15-f;- 111 2-153I6 0211 801 P Hkc L C ROVE-LORI' i I RONIU 6Gc112G1-A' 11(1 2-2.21:SfRCRT USIL\'lilt SI SO B(oaA SE. SALI:.I. MA 01970 S;ALIiNI.NIA 01970 SwlaM NA oi4}o 16 IB66 0 16_011-I9 0 I a pp LLL vSRI ZYUNIUN'C EL(11tLS I',\UL R P2 a.yU0.y (L 119 NLA,iON$l7tEEf 6 SIL 'l'It Sl Rld I' of u A-I'A SALE,4,NIA 01970 S.ALENT.NLA (1197U a� a� 6sov CL"I:z1. ' PA 111101 1611 , .1 .10 SARK, I):AN'IEL'I Ff.OIFL PA(r1.. R R SII. It Sf 6SII.VIiR S'I-RLI:I S:vL:vI„A1/v 01970 S:AU M,MA 01970 16 (I', 0 f0-e+a_LI Sacco RA) vo-.I,S1),JANIES w J IsSil IINs1- ��'J0.'-fc-son A-ve. zrt- I�o.+1-c am SALEr.1.NIA 01970 pz'40�y, N/� 01 160 Q�.�vay7 01960 16MHU 0: ke :A Tut sem\ 2� Ft 1y s�- 2 ' , 1111I' .S1L.. T D 2.PwI{vtn,xAh15 jlwil-1 BALI V. \1,A 01970 V2 al F� jrwsr 17 �01 I``7 Ste. M/1 C19 60 11�6tc6ti.a�L, r2-/>_ or9��s Ruvv -.II IwLAs :usll '.1_I:s rIm r SAL \1, %I 01970 �fov�AA Ck, �_ o S o-f.O„c. t1 /} v I 9 }o ��)) ZgD6- 3-Sfd I6 0: I 10 ryta'r S1 . Vy Ptall-y J-ACh t!-I: RFVAJN 11RUS1 //�� _ ].i Sll .'1'. �'I R1'F1' Fro"-k� ”. R0L I(. S,Vl I vI,A 111'017 3 99 r11/4 rl9YS _ a wc0965 �i A?IaAN `I� / w+a6p3 d0-do asodxa 1adn�o», Easy Peel'O Labels � Bend along toUse Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose POP-Up Edge*Mji AVERYO 596OTM Medina A. J. & A. B. Trustees Medina A. J. & A. B. Trustees � 27 Howley Street 2 Howley Street Merl} a A. J. &A. B. Trustees Peabody, MA 01960 Pe ody, MA 01960 27 H wley Street Peab y, MA 01960 A & A Howely Street Realty Trust A &A F�owely Street Real Trust Medina Augustine/Anna Trustees A &A Ho ely Street Realty Trust 78 East Mountain Avenue Medina �ugustine/Anna Trustees Medina Au ustine/Anna Trustees Revere, MA 02151 78 East f�vQQountain Avenue 78 East Mo plain Avenue Revere, M 02151 Revere, MA 2151 50 Grove Street Real Est, LLC 50 Grove Str t Real Est, LLC 7 Rantoul Street 50 Grove Street eal Est, LLC Beverly, MA 01915 7 Rantoul Stre 7 Rantoul Street Beverly, MA 01 15 Beverly, MA 0191 yo o P abody Planning Board City of Peabody Pla ing Board Peabody i all Peabody City Hall City of Peabody Plan 'ng Board 24 Lowell Street Peabody City Hall Peabody, MA 01960 24 Lowell Street ell Street Low Peabody, MA 01960 24 24 Low Peabody, MA 01960 `:tlquettes faciles A peter ; Reonez A6 ti. ti .e ay.4-1 REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION h 6/20/12 REVISE PER PEER REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS 1 2 7/15/12 MISC. REVISIONS I., E PLAN FOi 3 9/10/12 REVISE PER REVIEWER COMMENTS. 4 9/19/12 UPDATE RES. AREA. CALCS. j 10/1/12 ADD 1&5 HARMONY GROVE TO PROJECT VE 6 11/6/12 COMPILE UPDATED PLAN SET 7 3/11/13 MISC. REVISION FOR CON. COMM. FILING. ADD REMEDIATION. usl EM, XEL . DLOPMIL ..Nl{ _7= 77_77 I E- GACY PARK, APAlRTM .FNTtq- AT I lAl i c LIST OF DRAWINGS : REVISED MArPt" CH 11 , 2013 _N-1 : PLAN NOTES o s OWNER-& MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC APPLICANT: '°y/<</ps oG C-1 : BOUNDARY & ZONING PLAN , 9 ABBOTT STREET S . BEVERLY, MA 01915 q4NuT - EXI T s . C 2. SING CONDITIONS PLAN HARMONY GROVE ENGINEER: GRIFFIN ENGINEERING GROUP, LLC CEMETERY C- 3. OVERALL SITE LAYOUT PLAN P.O. BOX 7061 ti � NqR 100 CUMMINGS CENTER ��� ROBERT �9�y m c.n M°"Y �Rp ` C-3R-C: SITE LAY o y. m z > Ro. o OUT PLAN IN L SUITE 224G U #36686 CIVIL �y "'�/N S, e'I' BEVERLY, MA 01915 _ R Sr �� Cm- GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SURVEYOR. LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES C-5A-C: UTILITIES PLAN 161 HOLTEN STREET eF� SITE • DANVERS, MA 01923 e �PNP� �� °ST°N Q N R\ R C-6: DETAILS � e��FR °mss eR BUILDING BEAUDS ART, INC. ST 5�. C-7: DETAILS II ARCHITECT: 15 LONGWOOD DR. F� KE N N E B U N K, ME 04043 C-8: DETAILS III LANDSCAPE SEBAGO TECHNICS D e°ST°� S . C-9: DETAILS IV ARCHITECT: ONE CHABOT STREET o WESTBROOK, ME 04098 0C-10: DETAILS V 0 o Q 1 OF 1 LANDSCAPING PLAN SITE WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS Z LIGHTING: 1919 WINDSOR PLACE 1 OF 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FORT WORTH, TX 76110 0 0 A1 . 1 FIRST & UPPER FLOOR PLAN mm LOCUS MAP u' A2. 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS cn T = 400' 0 0 z . z A22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GENERAL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.3: UTILITY NOTES (CONT. 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF THE 10. ALL PROPOSED SLOPES (EXCLUDING RIP-RAP SLOPES) STEEPER THAN 5:1 AND ALL SLOPES 14. WHERE WATER MAINS CROSS OVER SEWER LINES WITH LESS THAN 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE, EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON THE RECORDS OF REGARDLESS OF SLOPE WITH AN OVERALL CHANGE IN GRADE GREATER THAN 10 FEET FROM TOP TO AND WHERE WATER MAINS AND SERVICES CROSS BENEATH SEWER LINES, SEWER LINE AND WATER VARIOUS PLANS AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THIS INFORMATION IS BOTTOM SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LINE SHALL BE CAREFULLY ENCASED IN CONCRETE. ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND FROM PIPE NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPOSED SLOPES (SLOUGHING, EROSION, ETC.) THAT SURFACES A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 8" ALL AROUND AND ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND ALONG UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE START OF RESULT DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AS DIRECTED BY THE EACH PIPE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET FROM THE OTHER PIPE AS MEASURED NORMALLY " CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES, GOVERNING ARCHITECT/ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. FROMM ALL POINTS ALONG THE PIPES. PERMITTING AUTHORITIES, AND "DIG SAFE" AT LEAST 72 HOUR'S PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORKI TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ON SITE AT ALL TIMES ADDITIONAL HAYBALES, EXTRA SILTATION 15. PROPOSED GAS SERVICE LOCATIONS ARE APPROX]MATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES INTERFERING WITH PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL FENCING, A STOCKPILE OF CRUSHED STONE, EXTRA FILTER BAGS OR ANY OTHER ITEM SPECIFIED CONFIRM WITH THE GAS COMPANY THAT GAS LINES INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE BY THE LOCAL GAS ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH THE WORK. IT HEREIN FOR EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL FOR INSTALLATION AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE THE GAS COMPANY ADVANCE NOTICE OF WHEN THE GAS E RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO MITIGATE ANY EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. LINE CAN BE INSTALLED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COORDINATION, EXCAVATION, SHALL BE TH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST BACKFILL AND COMPACTION FOR THE GAS LINE. TO THE OWNER. 12. THE AREA OR AREAS OF ENTRANCE OR EXIT TO AND FROM THE SITE SHALL BE CLEARED OF 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING STAFF AT LEAST 48 ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER 16) ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND SCHEDULED WITH THE OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE AREA OR AREAS OF ENTRANCE AND EXIT SHALL BE APPROPRIATE UTILITY-COMPANY SERVICING THE PROJECT SITE. HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT OFF OF THE 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING ALL HORIZONTAL PROJECT SITE. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED) OR TRACKED OFF THE PROJECT SITE FOR DUE TO THE SMALL SCALE OF THE SIRIFIED DRAWINGS, EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITY STUBS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. FOR BUILDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE BUILDING DRAWINGS. SERVICE STUBS TO AND VERTICAL CONTROL POINTS AND BENCH MARKS NECESSARY FOR THE WORK AND FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO A POINT 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING WALL UNLESS PROVIDING ANY CONTROL INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO THE BUILDING 13. PRIOR TO INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED. CONTRACTOR. ENGAGE AN INDIVIDUAL WITH PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND EXPERTISE IN EROSION AND SEDIMENT 4. TEST PITS WERE DONE FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STORMWATER INFILTRATION FIELD DESIGN AND CONTROL TO MONITOR SAME. THE EROSION CONTROL MONITOR SHALL PREPARE A MONTHLY REPORT 18) THE PRIMARY ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY WETLAND AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT. TEST PITS SHOW CONDITIONS OBSERVED WHICH SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES. ALL ASPECTS OF THE THESE SERVICES SHALL BE DESIGN/BUILD BY AT THESE SPECIFIC POINTS ONLY. THEY DO NOT NECESSARILY SHOW THE NATURE OF ALL FEDERAL AGENTS UPON REQUEST. THIS REPORT SHALL INDICATE THE STATUS OF THE EROSION THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL, AND UTILITY COMPANY MATERIALS TO BE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTROLS AND ANY MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AND PERFORMED. INSPECTIONS AND REPORTS SHALL STANDARDS AND CODES. THE OWNER HAS VERIFIED THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE ELECTRIC AND CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM TELEPHONE SERVICES. ALL COSTS AND FEES ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING THESE SERVICES 5. GRADES, BOTH EXISTING AND FINISHED, ARE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. THE LLC THAT WILL HOLD (NPDES) PERMIT. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FURNISHING AND INSTALLING ALL STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT, CONDUIT, WIRING, POLES, TRANSFORMERS, PADS, PERMITS, EASEMENTS, ETC. NECESSARY TO BRING THESE THE CONTRACT AND/OR ENGINEER ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR EXISTING GRADES SHOWN ON 14. ANY DEWATERING REQUIRED ON THE SITE SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A TEMPORARY SILT REMOVAL SERVICES TO THE BUILDING SHALL BE COORDINATED 'WITH THE OWNER AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL AREAS WHEREIN (GRADES ARE SHOWN TO SATISFY BASIN LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 100' BUFFER ZONE FROM WETLANDS. OF TEH CONTRACTOR UNLESS SPECIFIC ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE WITH THE OWNER IN WRITING HIMSELF AS TO ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND INCORPORATE ANY DISCREPANCIES DISCOVERED. PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING ALL (CONTROL POINTS AND MARKINGS INSTALLING WIRES AND CONDUIT FROM 10' OUTSIDE THE BUILDING TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL NECESSARY FOR THE WORK. PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PRESERVE MATERIALS OUTSIDE THE 15. REFER TO THE OPERATIONS & MAINTENCE PLAN (0&M)) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ROOM. LINE OF LIMIT OF WORK IN THE MOST UNDISTURBED CONDITIONS POSSIBLE. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: PARKING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: 1. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A GAS/OIIL HOOD ON THE DISCHARGE PIPE AND 19) LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS AND PHOTOMETRICS ARE BY WLS LIGHT OF FORTH WORTH, TEXAS AND 1. HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHALL HAVE A 4' DEEP SUMP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE (MASSACHUSETTS STORMWATER ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES. CIRCUITRY IS TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF JANUARY 1992, AS AMENDED. MANAGEMENT POLICY. THE SITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR HIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SITE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF A COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAIL SITE LIGHTING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WILL 2. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE RCP, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL STANDARDS AND CODES, INCLUDING WIRING CONDUIT, STRUCTURES, 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING DESIGNATED WITH A "V" SHALL BE SIGNED AS "VAN ACCESSIBLE" PER ADA BASES, POLES, FIXTURES, ETC. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUIT, WIRING, 4.1.2.58. 3. ALL STORM SERVICE CONNECTIONS (ROOF LEADERS) SHALL BE 6" INSIDE DIAMETER SCH40 PVC ETC. UP TO 10' FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. BUILDING CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 3. ALL CURBING SHALL BE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE UNLESS NOTED OR DETAILED OTHERWISE. OF CHDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY ENGINEER. INSTALLING WIRES AND CONDUIT FROM 10' OUTSIDE THE BUILDING TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL ROOM. 4. ALL LIMITS OF PAVING SHALL BE CURBED UNLESS DETAILED) OTHERWISE. 4. A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER SERVICES CROSS DRAIN LINES. 5. ALL STANDARD PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 9' IN WIDTH BYE 19' IN LENGTH, WITH 24' AISLE UNLESS NOTED OR DETAILED OTHERWISE. 5. RIP RAP SPLASH PADS AND FLOW SPREADER BERMS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL OUTFALLS. 6. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL BE PAINTED WITH 2 COATS OF PAINT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 6. REFER TO THE OPERATIONS & MAINTENCE PLAN (O&M) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS BETWEEN COATS OF PAINT UNLESS THE PAINT MANUFACTURER REQUIRES LONGER IN WHICH CASE THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS SHALL GOVERN. UTILITY NOTES: 1. ALL WATER MAINS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET OF COVER AND A 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING PLLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND MAXIMUM OF SIX FEET OF COVER EXCEPT AS NOTED, DETAILED OTHERWISE, OR REQUIRED BY THE DIMENSIONS OF BUILDING SIDEWALKS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAWING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY. A VARIATION IN THESE DEPTHS IS PERMITTED (IF ALLOWED BY DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY) WHERE REQUIRED TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH OTHER UTILITIES. HOWEVER, CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL WATER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES IN 8. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND MARKING ARE TO CONFOIRM TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, INCLUDING GUIDELINES. BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLEARANCES, BEDDING, BACKFILL, INSULATION, ETC. ANY VARIATION FRO11 THE PLAN LAYOUT MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. THE LIMIT OF THE WORK LINE FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE LIMIT OF THE 2. GENERALLY, WATER MAIN FITTINGS IDENTIFIED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE SHOWN FOR INSTALLATION . WORK NECESSARY FOR GRADING OR UTILITY PURPOSES. NO WORK SHALL OCCUR BEYOND THESE LOCATION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THAT NOT ALL FITTINGS REQUIRED FOR THE 1 6/20/12 CHANGE TITLE BLOCK LIMITS OR BEYOND THE LIMITS DEFINED BY THE HAYBALE/SILT,' ENCE. WORK ARE NOTED, SHOWN, OR INDICATED. No Date Description ti 2. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE- CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 3. ALL WATER MAIN FITTINGS, TEES, HYDRANTS, ETC. SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH CONCRETE WITH THE MASSACHUSETTS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (GUIDELINES FOR URBAN AND THRUST BLOCKS. Revisions SUBURBAN AREAS, DATED MARCH 1997, AS AMENDED, AND ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL REGULATIONS. 4. ALL HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 6" C.L.D.I. RUNOUT AND SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR ,TO THE APPROPRIATELY SIZED GATE VALVE, BOX, AND TEE FITTING. ALL HYDRANTS SHALL MEET LOCAL COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK OR EARTHWORK OPERATIONS AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE IMSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, AND REMAIN IN PLACE, UNTIL ALL SITE WORK IS COMPLETE AND LOCAL MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANTS AND THEIR PIPING SHALL BE MECHANICALLY GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED. RESTRAINED. * ROBERT 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY MADE AWARE THAT THE SOIL CHARACTERISTICS, TOPOGRAPHY, AND 5. A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET CLEAR HORIZONTAL SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY ^: H ;> THE WETLANDS PROXIMITY AT THIS SITE MAKE IT PARTICULARLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO SOIL EROSION AND SEWER MAINS AND WATER MAINS. WHENEVER CONDITIONS PREVENT A LATERAL SEPARATION OF 10 GRIFFIN SENSITIVE TO ITS CONSEQUENCES. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE DEEMED FEET TO A WATER MAIN, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH AND THE CIVIL NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER OR THE MUNICIPALITY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ELEVATION THE CROWN OF THE SEWER SHALL BE AT LEAST 18 INCHES BELOW THE INVERT OF THE #36686 WATER MAIN. � „�, , r 5. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OFAr SINGLE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BIE RESPONSIBLE FORE THE SITING, 6. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES 2.5" AND SMALLER SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER TUBING AND SHALL BE RELOCATION, AND AUGMENTATION OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING HAYBALES, SILTFENCE, INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED CORPORATION STOP WITH APPROVED SADDLE, CURB STOP, �•Zd-( Z DRAINAGE SWALES, TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATIONS BASINS, CRUSHED STONE, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR AND BOX. SHALL ANTICIPATE AND MODIFY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BASED ON PAST AND CURRENT WEATHER CONDITIONS, SEASON AND EXPECTED FUTURE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AS THE PROJECT 7. ALL WATER MAINS 3" OR LARGER SHALL BE CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, AND PROGRESSES AND SITE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS CHANGE. IN THE EVENT THAT INSUFFICIENCIES IN THE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED FITTINGS AND GATE VALVES. EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES ARE IDENTIFIED BY THE OWNER, OR AN AGENT FOR THE OWNER, THE LEGEND (Tvpical All Sheets) CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING, SUPPLEMENTING, RELOCATION, OR OTHERWISE 8. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED GATE, BOX AND Griffin PROVIDING EROSION CONTROLS AS NECESSARY.AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. TEE FITTINGS. o s%H STONE BIOUND/DRILL HOLE PROP. BUILDING 6. STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH STAKED HAYBALES AND/OR SILTATION FENCES TO 9. ALL WATER MAIN APPURTENANCES, MATERIALS, METHODS OF INSTALLATION AND TESTING O DRILL HOLE PROP. RETAINING WALL El79iIr1 eerlClg PREVENT AND/OR CONTROL SILTATION AND EROSION. THE LOCATION OF THE STOCKPILE AREAS REQUIREMENTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS. O IRON ROD PROP. BIT. CONC. CURB MAY BE MODIFIED AS APPROVED BY THE ON-SITE EROSION CONTROL MONITOR, BUT SHALL BE Group, LLC LOCATED OUTSIDE THE 100' WETLAND BUFFER ZONE. TOPS OF STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED IN 10. PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TEST, DISINFECTION AND FLUSHING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH - - PROPERTY LINE - PROP. EDGE OF GRAVEL SUCH A MANNER THAT STORMWATER DOES NOT INFILTRATE THE MATERIALS AND THEREBY SUCCEED ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IN MAKING IT UNSUITABLE FOR FILL USE. ALL COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH UTILITY TESTS, FLUSHING AND INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY THE - - EASEMENT LINE PROP. CONTOUR P.O Box 7061 LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. MEAN HIGH WATER LINE W PROP. WATER LINE 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G 7. EARTHWORK ACTIVITY ON THE SITE SHALL BE DONE IN A MANOR SUCH THAT RUNOFF IS wv Beverly, MA 01915 DIRECTED TO TEMPORARY DRAINAGE SWALES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS. 11. PRIMARY WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTED SHIALL BE LOCATED AT THE POINT WHERE /1/«///1//1 EXIST. BUILDING 4f PROP. WATER GATE VALVE THE WATER LINE ENTERS THE BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS. EXIST. CURB PROP. HYDRANT Tel: 978-927-5111 8. HAYBALE FILTERS AND/OR FILTER BAGS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL EXISTING & PROPOSED CATCH BASINS SUBJECT TO STORMWATER RUN-OFF FROM PROPOSED EARTHWORK AREAS DURING 12. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPES SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) SDR35 UNLESS NOTED H-H+ H--IIII I-III I H Ff+ EXIST. RAILROAD TRACKS s PROP. SEWER GRAVITY LINE Fax: 978-927-5103 CONSTRUCTION, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER/ENGINEER. NO SEDIMENTS SHALL ENTER THE OTHERWISE. EXIST. RETAINING WALL G PROP. SEWER MANHOLE ON-SITE OR OFF-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AT ANY TIME. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE INSTALLED INSIDE - -14 - - - EXIST. CONTOURS G PROP. GAS LINE CATCH BASINS IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREA WHERE HAYBALES WILL INTERFERE WITH TRAFFIC. 13. A MINIMUM OF 18" CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER MAINS CROSS STORM GV MRM PROJECT PROP. GAS GATE VALVE- 9. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE ROUTINELY INSPECTED DRAIN LINES. 0 EXIST. FENCE MCLEANED AND REPAIRED OR MANAGEMENT LLC w REPLACED AS NECESSARY THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTIONS SHALL TAKE wV EXIST. WATER LINE D PROP. DRAIN LINE PLACE AT LEAST ONE A WEEK AT THE END OF THE WORKWEEK, PRIOR TO WEEKENDS AND WHEN EXIST. WATER GATE VALVE@ PROP. CATCHBASIN SALEM, MA PRECIPITATION IS FORECASTED. DEFICIENCIES OF ANY KIND SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE ® PROP. DRAIN MAHOLE 0 EXPECTED PRECIPITATION OR PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE FOR THE WEEKEND. INSPECTIONS SHALL EXIST. HYDRANT ALSO OCCUR AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.5" OF RAINFALL AND DEFICIENCIES s EXIST. SEWER GRAVITY LINE RL PROP. ROOF LEADER CORRECTED DURING THAT WORK DAY. FMEXIST. SEWER FORCE MAIN T❑ PROP. TRANSFORMER .PAD G EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE G 'EROSION CONTROL GV EXIST. GAS LINE P4 EXIST. GAS GATE VALVE �--- 100' BUFFER ZONE NOTES " D EXIST. DRAIN LINE ® EXIST. CATCHBASIN 0 EXIST. DRAIN MAHOLE - C-cbSggLe.- 1`=40' EXIST. UTILITY POLE EXIST. UTILITY POLE W/ LIGHT 700 0 Job No, N - 1 a -Fie P/P/s/h-b i E DAk' 12/20/11 T I ` NOTES: 1 THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING EXISTING ZONING FEMA 100-YEAR INFORMATION AND LOT BOUNDARIES. FLOOD) ZONE 2) BOUNDARY SURVEY BY LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC., DANVERS, MA. J /� ZONE A (EL. 10.8) _ - - 3) ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ON THE 1929 N.G.V.D. DATUM. �- 4) SUBSURFACE UTILITIES EXIST ON-SITE AND ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. \ 1.=26881-3339 SB DH (HLD LINE) 3 HARMONY GROVEf�0^o ROAD PROPERTY IS OPD MAP 16LO�3�- \- _ (0 o \ 25' WIDE Zs ENTIRELY WITHIN THE C R, ' i / N/F \ S.E.S.D. SEWER WETLAND FLOOD O\J i , , i HARMONY GROVE CORP.\ � EASEMENT HAZARD OVERLAY G?\ - E� % (1 HARMONY GROVE RD.) \ SB/DH \ DISTRICT % �' 0 / 'o i 20,909± SQ. FT FND & HLD EXISTING MEAN HIGH MAP 16 LOT 238 �1 5 / d i WATER LINE IN THIS ROVA ��P•t /f )�� i 0.48± ACRES PORTION OF THE 50 GROVE STREETREALEST, LLC \ ' �O 'n \ CANAL. LAND COURT PLAN 33813A \ °25 WIDE � �' / Stti�Soo �' - NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL ss °�3 - - - ���� G��%, 0 S.E.S.D. SEWER N Ng w & METAL 252 + A F - ENTRANCE \ �y I BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE - CORRIDOR \EASEMENT, DECK= EL. 9.2t \ OVERLAY � \S�R\C11- � i / DISTRICT 60 GROVE STREET R1 D, SR1� ENTRANCE MAP 16 LOT 239 PROPERTY IS CORRIDOR N/F ENTIRELY WITHIN THE II r C OVERLAY MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT EXISTING \ WETLAND FLOOD - i 1 13i N -CORRIDOR 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD E \ \ HAZARD OVERLAY \ iF ( ) S611 53 05 E BRIDGE J 1 ► L ' �c� I 35,561 SQ.FT. DISTRICT Q EXIST. I N25'16'20"E 1'19.45 ABUTMENTS - _��� .Iv4A1�N LOT 378 , RAILROAD 1 - 0.82 ACRES - �- - \ `_ 30.50' + _ �- - - - / CROSSING _ L-141.17 - - - - - HARMONY GROVE CORP. EASEMENT - R=2844.81' S61'53'05"E 15'± N23'11'05"E a �� 3- 0---o \� AUTHORITY (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) L=149.4�.�� 1 BAY TRANSPORTATION TA TION 1 plp 44,432± SQ. FT I 1 7 , R.R. TRACKS R=2844.81 L 1.0 - R R.. TRACKS F�1{I+ + - -- - - - - - - - S61*53'05"E _ _..... n U SETTS L=397.1 8 o RET. WALL 4618.84' \ MASSAOH, _ jF=- 814.31 -� CHORD ` CHO I \� V l� 11.99 BARREL L=29.5' 43.10 �� N22'09'28"W LL--7c) STORAGE \ 01'13 59 W N24 4018E BUILDING 59 ` " _ - - R=2844.81' 510'08'10"E \ L.C.- '± = EL. EXISTING \ \ 90.33' I' 4f lZ�=, 515 E�i I ENTRANCE CORRIDOR 30.50 � LC=4.4 ± N 1 OVERLAY DISTRICT STORAGE LOC `' AREA \ MAP 16 LOT 237 \ -89 58, I3r BIT \� RET WALL TOW _ 5�7 B8.�� \\\ OFFICE MRM PROJECEXISTING T MANAGEMEN S09'52'11"W I I WETLAND FLOOD CONC EL; 9 6t NORT BUILDING (60 GROVE STREET) 26.59' FEMA 100-YEAR EXISTING MEAN HIGH, = FLOOD ZONE -o HAZARD OVERLAY CHIMNEY WATER LINE IS INSIDE E/� fill I fill Ir ^'io DISTRICT P� WETLAND FLOOD / FACE OF RETAINING � ���,,;,� S5 /(/ CRNA �Ahl 26,946 SQ.FT. ! \ " I I Z ZONE A (EL. 10.8) 01 o HAZARD OVERLAY-►� O 53 32" T�0 \ TE BLOCK 0.62 ACRES TIE LINE S09 30 54 W WALL IN THIS PORTION E 'qL RET ^ , I m �1 o DISTRICT OF THE CANAL. Y ' ' \ WALL TOW _ I 38.56' Lo �0 I I nl n / Q FINISHING "'y' ARAN\ EL. 9.6, _ m -'I-� o BUILDING BLOCK S38'33'38"E �n o0 I m I I ET. W N � \ ALL TO 8.20' z i 0° I I CON / i m I o o j C' LANDING COOPERAGE \ EL. 9.st MAP 16 LOT 236 / \ _ Nog 3 1 N/F FEMA 100-YEAR / ) ROOM \ - �-2"W I MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT FLOOD ZONE / `-� WETLAND FLOOD 286.47' ST 1 (64 GROVE STREET) ZONE A (EL. 10.8) / HAZARD OVERLAY S16*16'13"W I ONE RET WALL I 234,152 SQ.FT. FEMA 100-YEAR \\ DISTRICT 11 54.44' MAP 16 LOT 217 5.38 ACRES i FLOOD ZONE �- A 1 N/F _ -_ \ ZONE A (EL 10.8) \� \ `` ' 1 10/1/12 ROAD TO PLAN. ADD 1&5 ONY GROVE SARKES i GATE #12 I m \ R=96.82 No Date Description L=39.20 _ _ l6 1 PRETREATMENT . CO \ ^ Revisions I � FACILITY NC. RET. - - - - - - / \ _ _ _ MAP 16 LOT 218_ _ BPD DISTRICT - - - - - - - - - - - BPD DISTRICT - - - - � - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - \ -BPD DISTRICT I z- - - - - - - - - ISTRICT f �/ I SIL VER L NTFR2 DISTRICT N60'26'11"W N30'35 46 E S30'55 09 W N30*43 13 E R2 DISTRICT K R T (PUBLIC WAY FLORES VL i 10.47' 10.34' '10.02T WA[ I SULFONATION \ I 172.12 _ N60'17'03"W - - - - - - - - N60'17'0:3"W BUILDING l - - 2 � N '02'3 "E I--_-- ° MAP 16 LOT' M 1 93.10" ° ° _ N44.11'20"W\ 39'27'56"WI w 4 50.50 A TE - - _ O # - 224 LOT 225 - - MAP 16 . , o" N/F #34 N/F OT 227 ° HED ° N10'00'12"W 18. 2' \ WAREHOUSE / 29.28' I t o Mq J , o I #28 SHED S ® \ S23'34'49"W ' " / S58'52'37"WI ROHERT tim MAP 16 LOT 76 Q r�o MAP 16 LOT I CONLEY I TUC ER• N F 22.60 S31'1830"W 10.34 o � � / N60'39 54 W � " N/F #2 n 3 uj� I 223 I I • 60'42,07"W I #32 LAWSON N30'38'46,, _ - - - FISH N60 39 54 W 28.00 11.98 I FLORES �� N/F 113.68 - POND x -a WALL \ o GRIFFIN - - /� + 1 1 86 80 _� „ 1 c I •o CIVIL 4 tli MAP 16 A&N REAL 29• 4 I 20.47 I N61'25 51 W TR 2 I `' 3668 MAP 16 1 LOT 222 MAP 16' LOT 23 x . ° '-34.51' - W _ ALL\ S61'01'28"W I �� �A ESTATE GARDE �� ,+ LOT 220 U KOHLOFER TRUST DEMEULE Cx MAP 16 LOT 232 w 1 N71 2 9' " 2 \ - 14.97 N - _ 69.9 N31 27 40 # S64'15'50"W i I I ' BLANDEN O / ' Q I IMAP 16 }�p o N/F ,t� to" 16.51' MAP 16 \ , `t I I I I N/F 23 I� �' MYERS i rn N # / 11.15 ` -12- I I �' 1 #44 I /F 00 t�_ o �' 10 MAP 16 LOT 235 \ , #418 P) to Q I I I I ROSS #20 N 0) o t\I MAP 16 11 LOT 380 N/F \ / N51 56 8 W REFERENCES: Z , ,+ I #24 rn r z '`� MAP 16 LOT' LOT 234 PATTISON 107.76 S32'54 25 #40 #38 #36 #30 MAP 16 LOT 229 I N 233 #6 N/F N/F \ J / / N/F 14 CSWIGGIN PAT11SON 1) DEED BOOK 25700 PAGE 109 31.90 0 # *35'43"'W 1 N54'S4'20"W \- - BASH - / SPERIDAKOS 2) DEED BOOK 7654 PAGE 26 - _..3) PLAN BOOK 152 PLAN 98 N60'02'30"W BEA VER S TR ' GRAN. 64.51' 2.81' urinvin 4) LAND COURT PLAN #11241B 20.23' EE T N6 40.00? W POST \ s 5) PLAN #8828 (CITY) - - - - FND ENTRANCE CORRIDOR \ En ineerin (PUBLIC WAY N 6) PLAN IN DEED BK. 5452 PG. 111 - - - - - - - - .30 WIDE) - - - - - - - - - - _ _ OVERLAY DISTRICT \\ Group, LLC g 7) PLAN IN DEED BK. 4983 PG. 400 - - (SEE ZONING SEC. 8.2.2) \ P.O Box 7061 MAP 16 LOT 242 -0 v 1 - _ 8Pp'D� _I -� 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G N/F �� - 0 _ _ _ -r-_c Beverly, MA 01915 HARMONY GROVE -' � 3 �" N CORPORATION _ - - -_- �� �1 / ��, Te% 97$-927-5111 _ _ - 0 ° _ _ _ _ - - _ .-MAI 16 LOT 378 \�L°, Fax. 978-927-5103 ° 25' IDE R1 - _ HARMONY GROVE CORP. 4- - � - D _ EASEMENT - _ � � - _ �� - � I -10 (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) MRM PROJECT �O\ /C O q- - � � �__ p 1 p 44,432± SQ. FT •- G V L _R _ - - - - _ - - �_ _ -��- --- I �1�, 1.o MANAGEMENT, LLC -�-- 0 N Y _ -_ - _ _ - __ - 1 -� _-- m EXIST. MEAN HIGH ��___-=_---� - HARM _ _ - - - '- Ts SALEM MA WATER LINE IN THIS _ - _ I -+I� SSgCHUSET PORTION OF THE _ MA °CC, 0 CANAL _ -z� _ _ _ - - - �- .62 - - - - - - °���,T - -= MP 16 LOT 378 _-�_-� TRACr`S - lid - - - -� - N/F -�� S�9.5815 E HARMONY-GROVE CORP. 58' I fn (11 _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) 1=0t ALO VER- 1 pISTRIC.T _ - b/��-- 89• I - - - - - - - - - - --�� 44,432± SQ. FT ORI TY - % 1-D+ FEMA 100-YEAR i BOUNDARY & Q' - - - - - - ---" 1.02 A - , AUTH - _ plsrRsc�- 10 1� TA TION _ _ _ EXIST. MEAN HIGH I= FLOOD ZONE NIo w - --- _ _ - ZONE A (EL. 10.8) ZONING PLAN - TIDAL TRgNSPO _ - --�- WATER LINE IN THIS Iz Flo ° - E _ _ __ -- vE CAN - - I gAY _ _ - - _ - - ENTRANCE PORTION OF THE I MAP 16 LOT 216 !' 1 m �I L=137.83 - - - - �r \ - OR TH RI _ SETTS I _ _ _ - - - CORRIDOR CANAL. N/F �� i _ N SACH U _ _ _ _ - - - �-- OVERLAY 1 RAYMOND N �° � �I \ _-_____ - MAS _ _ _ - - - DISTRICT GRAPHIC SCALE �� I m I S� 1'=4o' 1 _ - MAP 86 LOT 135A J _-__- I 40 o zo 4o so iso z I > I N/F J��- -_ MAP 26 LOT 40 _ N I 10 j Job No,: 700 SOUTHERN ESSEX _ - N/F _ pI m _ SEWERAGE DISTRICT _ - MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY Ln p I F1e Name: P�P� /t,_ TRACKS _ _ -- ( IN FEET ) I N49 3o�2" 1 s b BOUND - ��" - - �' 1 inch = 40 ft. I 2 W I D 12/20/11 a . - I ST IIr_ 1 FEMA '100-YEAR / FLOOD ZONE ZONE .A (EL. 10.8) - �- - - ♦ / / \ EXIST. rn�� � � ♦� � C� EXIST. CB (ECB) aN -/- �, CURB CU RIM=8.10 G A l000 3 HARMONY GROVE NO' `NN�R O (OU =5.85 / / ' \ \ /�� j' ��• ROAD PROPERTY IS ,r,...�g. O P \ � i / / �i '��� 25' WIDE • .�. •X200' � •� ENTIRELY WITHIN THE \\ \ S.E.S.D. SEWER ■ •.� A�lf� ► WETLAND FLOOD O\f _ / / / MAP 16 LOT\377 \ / EASEMENT '°" • • • HAZARD OVERLAY GR DoE) '' / (1 HARMONY GROVE RD.) \ 12 vc \ • •,� • DISTRICT i W 1 ` 0 1/ 12" VC OUTFALL \ MAP 16 OT 238 • \ ` ^ N 50 ��_ OUTFALL 20,909± SQ. `F'T �''F` 1=5.3t \V 10 G \VP`���¢$ S ' / B K#7 I 1=4.3t 0.48 ACRES \ \ 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC \ LAND COURT PLAN 33813A TOP OF / �„�►''� BA r 6 \ � COASTAL =9'".-. �'' 1.7 NORTH RI VER CANAL - TIDAL ��%, �� 25' WIDE BANK �'' ANK#5 7-3 - \ �,.- -�� / OWS D&_METAL !y S.E.S.D. SEWER i_ - �•s �� /� BANK'4 1.+ BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE \ 60 GROVE STREET EASEMENT � � # 1.0 -DECK= EL. 9.2t BANK# BANK#8 _BANK#9 -� B 10 BANK#1I \ PROPERTY IS / N io # BANK#14 "�-�► ENTIRELY WITHIN THE f / - B #� / $ (- MAP 16 LOT 239 BAN1 WETLAND FLOOD `.� BANK#1 EXISTING -.� 'P / --BANK#1 i (3 HARMONY GRO� RD ) # BRIDGE \ --.., HAZARD OVERLAY \ iFsJ 35,561 SQ-FT. /V�- . � -- s- E �.00' BU DISTRICT i EXIST. �, 0.82 GRES 1VI�-1 ABUTMENTS ZO s -� OT 378 ` � RAILROAD / •"'� - FMFP \ e nlE RCE MAIN MAP 16 L - C-- - -- --- - - cr v - --� CROSSING � '`�s`�,-'•--' � - - -� -� � -•.. (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) _ _ iK#6 EASEMENT 44,432± SQ. FT ' J _ AUTHORITY S 1.02 ACRES -r SAN__ 5_ -�"� gA-� TRANSPORTATION TION R.R. TRACIKS 1`111 11 11 11.1 11 11 fill B 4 R.R. TRACK - - - - - TOP OF IT. NC. EGR i C UL R P LO 237 BANK#3 TTS --- E J _- '"� `- $' T. LL - � �� COASTAL P M T ED _.._ 1a- (60 RO ST R T 8ANKk2 ASSACH S -�=_ _�" _ _---\\ / �\ BANK BARREL 26, T. BANK#1 M ;� -�--_ - - _ -� �� r BUILDING 59 �� \ 0.62 ACRES STORAGE \ W EXISTING STt1<4` wA7ER s tp i-y_t}}r}1� - - ��_=� 14=--1s-- --- \ --i \ r � � � r STORAGE pCK RET AREA EXISTING ��-- \ \\s \\, 0/ \ Q -'10ALL Tow ` OFFICE tiffs o i r-22 \� BIT. \ - 12- r - ,- - \ /' � \ � -� EL- 9.6 BUILDING BIT. CONC. a � FEMA 1`0.0 YEAR ZONE \ \ \ - �4� CONIC o > f IVORTy PAVEMENT \\ FLOOD ZONE 100 gUF \ \ CHI EY P� Q f� FRC SE�c,ST J / \ \ \� WETLAN9 FLOOD EXISTING N RAIU BL %ZONE A (EL. 40.8) \ \� 1 HAZARD VERLAY / N " L IIDOC ,� \ / l OVERHEAD ,x ALK RET. DISTRICT \ r/ WALL Tp MW - STRUCTURE N r W FINISHING r �,� GRq EL- 9.6d- NG/ .6 f - , O A �' BUILDING EXISTING NITS B OC -r 7- p 0)VERHEAD K RET W - _-..�•- �' _ _�' \ o EG r STFRUCTURE ALL - -- - � �4- - -� 26 '' r•. \� 1,, \ • ■ � ! I ~1D C6& Cp RgpEp r TOW - -� - - - ; - - --2a- ,-,3 '\ I O MAP 16 LOT 236 BR Ki /BIT. CON . NC' LAND �� EL' 9.6� --' ------- 1 o NG COOPERAGE A A - \ I / (64 GROVE STREET) ''��o J HIMC _ _ - - _ - \ - �, PA TYPICAL 1�0 1 - - --�-�____ �� ^\�2` � \` ` ,� I �' �\ � ♦ 234,152 SQ.FT. �� FEM� 100-YE�R�"' �� �� -�8 �C� � ROOM 1 1 -- 3� \ �3 ,2a` ` ` \\ �i \\ � �6 ♦ 5.38 ACRES FLOOD ZOtJE \.� \\ 0DIN 3s, 6\ • \ �-- - ZONE EL. 10.� �-- BIT. CONC. ICON AREA 3 3/11/13 TLA FL D \ / -�- ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA -.._ . \ . 3•- - - - _-- ( \ --._ AZA D 0 RLA LINES. S TpNE - \ \ \ t0't : ..�' ` \ .� '8� _- -- ♦ --16---- -� PAVEMENT /,�� T. W - .� "� , \ DIS ICT ADD INFO FOR 1&5 HARMONY RET W �3 '104 ., ____ + - ♦\ r- ,� FEMA 100-YEAR T. �� �,' \ ` � 2 10/1/12 GROVE ROAD. MAP 16 LOT 217 ALL _� ?. "',\ ` \ ?�_-- - -18- -- -- __ - -_ \ /1�s�•... / r FLOOD ZONE EXIST. '-+ _ 1 P T ADD AUL AREAS, UPDATE I N/F 0+ \\\ �Q," ---.- _-��----20---- _- ~ ��-- �� ____ -, \ �// �QO' Q(j / ZONE A (EL 10.8) ST. VALVE �` cv 1 6/20/12 UTILITES & NOTE 6. FF- SARKES . t \ �\ - 14- - _ _ \ #12 \ .♦ �\ \\ -22-- ---- -- -- - - -22- --- - --- --�� ''� // wR/ZOIyE CONC. �, ,? P ESM No Date Description s ?d \ -.- - - - \\ --`� 3AST. -26 El #6 \ \ x--24- - - - - - - - -- - - - - \\ \\ \ PRETREATMENT 14- �` w- - - Y�EEXIS s w - - - - - � \ \ �_ • -/ _- \\ FACILITY RET S SE`S -EXIST- 10 _ SMH2 i / Revisions SILVER MAP 16 LOT 218 3?\\ \ �- �'- 26--------- 28 s-- _\\\`\\\� __'i` N/F �/ \ \_ - y --28-- - - - -- _ _ ` 30=-32- fir- J�/' -� \`\� _ - -`2_ - C ■ 2��4 \. 2 - c3 t� (PUBLIC WAY FLORES 3 ~ --34- -32- 3s---34-38--- • /�\`� -=3 -1-7 T_ SULFONATION � - - '"-= - - _ -a--'32- -z.. ✓=_- �� _ \' BUILDING -38--- - ,_ __--- r-- •• - _ 38-""- .3 4 i G TE --. M16 LOT- M - 1 - - o �40� c��- 6-34---_ -a - -�- =34 326L ''-�_ -- ��� \ WAREHOUSE 4 3 # ' - -®, _ ___ _ _ _ _ _- "�\ oNC. PAS,\��`-� o ;# 36 224 LOT 225 MAP 16 - '� - - * • z "� . N/F #34 N/F OT 22 28 - _ SHED . \?s\`\�-22 { 4 FR MAP' 16 LOT 76 I MAP 16 LOT I CONLEY I TUC ER • o N/F i ® • 200 `\ R1 FLOH. RES #2 I N2F 1 I I 1 #32 LAWSON I - - - - POND x = 0 ! ` �3�\ �-- WkLk'� N N / G o GRIFFIN MAP 16 A&N REAL I 1 i •' -e---o--� • �'��� 'A GRIFFIN CIVIL 0_ LOT 222 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 23 x GARDE I ° s\ ' \ i ALL G \ 3 #36686MAP LOT 220 6 N/F TRUST N/F \3g� BIT. CON N F v KOHLOFER DEMEULE " MAP 16 LOT 232 (�' #2 P VEMENT BLANDEN m I I I Q Q 1 SLOT 231 MAP 16 , I c MYERS o f o'T. CONC. PARMIAiG i CONC. MAP 16 / 1 #44 I 1 1 I N/F 20 L f oI #10 MAP 16 MAP 16 LOT X35 / EAST, SEWER scHEDULE �/•/3 Z I I I #48 1 #24 ROSS # _� MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 LOT 380 PATT/1SON S H10. 6 f BIT. MAP 16 LOT 2291 i #6 N F R 1 2 40 38 36 30 233 N/F / J # # # CONC. # N/F 14 ' CSWIGGIN PAT11SON INV=3.o8 _ - BASH - - - # I SPERIDAKOS ESMH2 -- RIM=11.28iNV=5.13 Gri % , I3 wA GRANITE C B BEA VER S FREE T - „ u - Engineering S S _ - '42J - - - - © (PUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE) � Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 Tel. 978-927-5111 Fax. 978-927-5103 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC SALEM, MA NOTES: 1) THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2) EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY BY LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC., EXISTING DANVERS, MA. 3) ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ON THE 1929 N.G.V.D. CONDITIONS PLAN .4) UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE THE RESULT OF RECORDS OF VARIOUS PLANS AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE ABSENSE OF SUBSURFACE UTILITIES IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO GRAPHIC SCALE S� 1'=4o' CONTACT "DIG SAFE" AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK. 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. 40 0 20 40 e0 160 ,Job No, 700 6) PER SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION O.R.A.D. (FILE #64-516) DECISION C- 2 DATED 7-19-2011 THE 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN He Name: P/P/s/h-b RIVERFRONT AREA. AS OF 6-20-12 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OF SAID DECISION ( IN FEET ) ARE CONTINUING AT MA DEP. i inch = 40 ft D� 12/20/11 "'� I GRAPHIC SCALE 1 \ 40 0 20 40 aa 160 NEW GRANITE CURB i _ , INLAID CONCRETE ® ST. AND CONCRETE �� / I (HLD LINE) CROSSWALK AND CURB SIDEWALK AT EXIST. ,� i - _ — ( IN FEET ) ADA RAMPS AT CURB CUT �' / , — — _ \ i 1 inch = 40 ft. MAIN ENTRACE 25 WIDE S.E.S.D. SEWER � MAP 16 LOT 377 f> \ EASEMENT STOSIGN �' i 1 HARMONY GROVE RD. SB/DH \ HISTORIC HIGH ' ' 0' pE� _ AND TOP '� ( 20,909f SQ. FT ) FND & HLD \ \ I MAP 16 LOT 238 0 Y 5 • t S��Q t. BA__/ I 0.48 ACRES \ \ I 50 GROVE STREET EST, LLC \ WATER LINE n RM i��C Wp. � , LAND COURT PLAN 33813A NORTH RIVER CANAL — _TIDAL \ HISTORIC HIGH E.S.D. 25' WIDE — / �, / BRIDGEWrOD &WMESA PIPE REMEDIATION AREA \ \ WATER LINE EASEMENT, DECK= EL 9.2± (SEE SHEET C-10) 1 R1C1�- PROPOSED I \ I - R p`SSR / VEHICLE BRIDGE. I \ ml Q MAP 16 LOT 237 HISTORIC HIGH L �p 4I i (SEE PLANS BY UI m MAP 16 LOT 239 EXISTING \ = 60 GROVE STREET %C• MCBRIE, LLC) =1- 3C f_ (3 HARMONY GROVE RD.) I=h" ( 26,946 SQ.FT. ) WATER LINE I I C• r i U W IU W HISTORIC HIIGH BRIDGE V W IU W J W 35,561 SQ.FT. WATER LINE \ ~Q W 1-W 0.62 ACRES REMEDIATION AREA EXIST Q=IQW 0.82 ACRES ABUTMENTS 3: 3: INLAID CONCRETE (SEE SHEET C-10) RAILROAD _ - ' - ' -- - - • _\\�\- _ 2 V)I S►(/) e MAP I6 LOT 378 MV)1� / _ - - . - - ---�-- Z , _ _ - - - - - - - - - __- - - - T (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) CROSSING - - • - • - - _ - - - — — , — . EXISTING LOADING — , — . CROSSWALKS & Q7 EASEMENT STOP SIGN \ —�- �— i AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN ADA RAMP AT 44,4321 SQ. FT _� _ - .r AND STOP i gA Y \ TRANSPORTATION TA TION R.R.. TRACKS ENTRANCE o� 1.02 ACRES BAR TYP 1 01111111111 kill 11111 IlifliLl HHH! — PROPOSED R.R. TRACKS _ L — — — — — — — — _ 2 ..� ~ RACK. BIKE' ;0 — FENCE _ —� . 59.1 -►�n �H U SETTS I --- BIT. CONC. PATH ��� -- 1 (TENANT PARKING) �-� MASSA _ _ _ _ I — L DUM STER AREA (TO REMAIN 01, o A L _ EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL v'o`w GRANITE PROP UCT ; RAI OAD OSSIN _ — 9 STORAGE SPACE �a CURBING _ - I EE P NS B VANA E _ _ IT PROPOSED ___--- � I & SSOC S) -o � � � _OCK RET. bVA PEDESTRIAN I AREA EXISTING BULK TRASH ( MONITORING �_ ��'�L rOW o BRIDGE I OFFICE 4 REPLACE e WELLS STORAGE AREA i NDIC 1 _ _ �_ ''---__ EL. g BUILDING SIDEWALKS 1 D WITHIN FENCED AMP ® _ �� CONC. s-* 1 NpR l- ALONG �' I = (TYP OF 4) ENCLOSURE �' I 16 11111 111 ( A-H - y R�VER C G 7 FROVE ST. RONTAGE W/ (It r 0 1 \ \ -� A/VA L_ 7-11) RANITE BL O CONCRETE e ADD RELOCATED MATERIAL P WPO AR B UDINER#1 \ . __ _ _I AL �� Ck WAS 6 3/11/13 CELL m RELOCATED -I = / I TOVY ADD 1&5 HARMONY GROVE I i1 —I — I FENC ENCL ED 47 UNI �� ,_ �� - �. GRA EL, �� - — 5 11/6/12 AREAS TO PLAN it I MATERIAL CELL TR H & CYCLI ( ) P OP I NI j (GRASS) _ STO GEA A ED -� . 40.0 E BLO — — ADD 1&5 HARMONY GROVE -II N 5 1 PR OSED CO RETE y w uI ING - i (TYP CHB DING B E RA S EWAI GA AG UN #2 ! BIT CK RET WALL 4 10/1/12 ROAD TO PLAN. RELOCATE PED 1 8 I TYP 2 ) ( _V ITS D R I CONC. Ow + EL — _ BRIDGE. UPDATE TABLES. I m 1 I 4 1 PER UILDI : '� C.A T �- �� 9,6-t — r '—_ _______ ___---------1 = PR OSED P POSE '�" _ 10 �`---- •` x Y ERA HI IKE R K � ' __ � 3 9/19 12 UPDATE RES. AREA CALC. 122 '� / ADD TABLE OF AREAS. PAIN7 - CROSSWALK \ +� 1 =_,_r PE UILDI ) AT LIN ' j 4 - P BUIL G) 2 7/15/12 HATCH RES. USE; ADJUST RES 1 I (TYP U.N.O.) ) '; s• = _ ° r P OPO ED u — ANDNDRIVEWAY.DARY N UPDATE G BLDG 2 &3 l STAN I ira I NCR W� GA GE IL �' 3 �` TABLE. MA CH LINES. REVISE 60 E RET. WgLL MAP 16 LOT 236 K � � -U GROVE ST. LAYOUT. UPGRADE I � SIDE K (4 D � 1 6/20/12 # ' MAP 16 LOT 217 (64 GROVE STREET) - - -- �� - 1 y ( TS) ISTD C H I N/F 234,152 SQ.FT. V `" TER INE SIDEWALKS & CROSSWALKS. _ ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. #12 SARKES I 5.38 ACRES c� - 1 `� SHIFT .GROVE ST. ENTRANCE. WIDEN VEHICLE BRIDGE. „ „ I #6 . .. ° - �/ V ° _- _ ADD BIKE RACKS. i I _ BPD DISTRICT -BP -DIS - - - - L — MAP 16 LOT 218 — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — -1- —~ — — SIL VER - - - - NTF R2 DISTRICT I 16 �' _ C I No Date Description ' (PUBLIC WAY FLORES 1 - = -" - ��.• I Revisions I i MAFI 16 LOT M 30 I i o #4 1224 LOT 225 MAP 116 i ` _ I N/F #34 N/F OT 227 #28 SHED SHED 1 INLAID CONCRETE MAP 16 LOT 76 MAP 16 LOT I C NLEY I TUC ER• N/F CROSSWALKS & ADA RAMPS STOP SIGN I RESIDENTIAL SPACE p `T , I / — — 1 AT MAIN ENTRANCES AND STOP I I� � N/F 3 I 223 I LAWSOIN I — — (146,855 SF) �- FLORES #2 QE: N/F I ► I I #32 I — — I WALL �., BAR I ��P� Esc MAP 16 ' LOT 222 RESTATEMAP 16 L I MAP 16 LOT 23 1 q ALL I �� ROBERT yG .~ H. m GRIFFIN - OT 220 KOHLOFER TRUST DEMEULE MAP 16 LOT 2321 ' #2 I `� CIVIL NOTES: F�"71BLANDEN c� �- (�" 1 REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES I N/F I IMAP 16 N/F 1 �T COdtdC• PAR�G MAP 16 PROP. �o #36686 m I I I Q Q LOT 23 MYERS I LOT 235 FENCE/ .* AND LEGEND. I L#44 I I N/F #10 MAP 16 MAP 16 N/F / #4g 4 I I I I I #24 ROSS #20 1 PAR ING 'MAP 16 LOT 6 LOT 234 LOT 380 PA mSON BIT. I MAP 16 LOT 2291 i 233 ` N/F N/F #40 #38 #36 CONC. #30 N/F #t q (8± SP CES) /111111 CSWIGGIN PATTISON `3 BASH — — SPERIDAKOS GRANITE cuR6 1 BEA VER STREET GRAN. — - - ZONING CHART 1 i POST REQUIRED PROVIDED (PUBLIC WA`Y N 30' WIDE) I FND PER PUDMIN. LOT AREA5 60,000 SF 362,000 SF Griffin MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100' 161 .37' FOOTNOTES: _ 1 REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. _ ��' Englneering MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 ' ) GRAPHIC SCALE _ _ Group, LLC MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5% 2) LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. 40 0 20 40 so 160 MAP 16 LOT 242 40.6 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. N/F - - _ _ - - -f� P.O Box 7061 MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1 ' SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. HARMONY GROVE _ - _ _ _ _ - — ' I 1 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6' 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE ( IN FEET ) CORPORATION -- _ _ _ _ _ - — Beverly, MA 01915 MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0' (1 .5 SP/UNIT). 22 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE inch = 40 ft - _ _ _ _ _ _ MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15' BUILDING. - - 52 '' WIDE R1 DkSTR�CT - - _ _ -�"�_- T Tel: 978-927-5111 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 5) LOT AREA INCLUDES #1 & #5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. Fax: 978-927-5103 MIN. PARKING -- 2154 IRO /� D _ - -- I o io __�- - �n ._-- - - _- NY �R ��_ - - - - - --- -- — _ _ —� _- — ' _-----`� 1 ��� MRM PROJECT _ - HARMO _ - - _ - _ - -'� - - - - _ - — --'"-- �' " MANAGEMENT, LLC S SALEM, MA -- - - - - - _ _ - - - - -_ �- - .�'' � MAP 16 LOT 378 (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) - - 44,432± SQ. FT —_ - --� O R rY —� _ _ -�- ;' 1> 1.02 ACRES _ - A AUTHORITY R2 p� TRLCL- -I ATION _ — _ _ _ = _ OVERALL r. _ TIDAL - TRANSPORT _ — —_ — SITE LAYOUT L _ _ .� MAP 16 LOT 216 -TH RIVER SAN — TS BAY _ I N/F �� �I I PLAN NOR — — — - SSACH U SET _ _ — _ _ _ _ — TABLE OF RESIDENTIAL SPACE RAYMOND m 1 �- A - - 'J LOT AREA RESIDENTIAL NON-RES. ��' MAP 86 LOT 135A __�-- �� USE AREA USE AREA I �� N/F `�--� �.� — — MAP 26 LOT 40 _ � 60 GROVE STREET 26,946 SF 0 SF 26,946 SF 10 SggL% 1"-40' SOUTHERN ESSEX — N/F o' M SEWERAGE DISTRICT �� MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY _ _ Ln 64 GROVE STREET 234,152 SF 142,056 SF 92,096 SF HARMONY GROVE ROAD 20,909 SF 0 SF 20,909 SF Job No, 700 — _�- - OWN _�� - - �'5 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 35,561 SF 4,799 SF 30,762 SF I File Name: p/p/s/h_b `" `" _ - BOUND ` _ - 5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 44,432 SF 0 SF 44,432 SF I TOTAL 362,000 SF 146,855 SF 215,145 SF Dom.12/20/11 l I� i MAP 16 LOT 237 IGH CURBING NOTES: m Q HISTORIC H � 1) CURBING IN PUBLIC WAY TO BE GRANITE. ( 60 GROVE STREET WATER LINE 2) CURBING ON SITE TO BE PORTLAND 26 , 946 SQ. FT. CEMENT CONCRETE. UwIUW I- w I E- w 0. 62 ACRESPROPOSED - _ � _ INLAID CONCRETE CROSSWALKS & — I EXISTING LOADING ADA RAMP AT R . R . TRACKS AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN ENTRANCE � u _ I '�1ti�1 i1i `-��� I� 1 1 1 1 1 1 I �T i- i I�1--T-I 1 I T�1� l T 1 I I I i 2 PROP. BIKE I PSTERIO RACK AREA N-- Mot*-- 59 . 1 Mgt* ( TENANT PARKING) 0 - cp ( TO REMAIN n EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL PROP. �o GRANITE 9. g STORAGE SPACE) y o CURBING AREA �� Z PROPOSED I �`'�---_ EXISTING r PEDESTRIAN v I OFFICE ® REPLACE BRIDGE � BUILDING SIDEWALKS ?. _ � -;0 NO/5) ALONG /-� GROVE ST. 4-1 C ,q GR FRONTAGE W/ y N,q _ A NI T � � LTID11B CONCRETE � oc � T VV LL T 40. 0' GRAN/ TE 9. 6 B -- Lo _ B/ T CONIC. ALL nG — _ T 0 N C. p A�- VV H EL. g � — �KE P POSE -� K E R K --� IGH E !-- IK �, jtl .F (TYP F 2 12 2. 7' i N _ P BUIL G) - . '�� RELOCATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. 1 10/1/12 ADD RAMPS. P 0P oNo Date Description ED U W /L NG Revisions ONCR GA 3 SIDE W LK GE ND U (TY TS) IST IC H H TER INE .....-._ ,.._.•-. . � � LIBER G N �K GR H. rri CIVIL ® ® V #36686 � BP DIS � 2 D{ RIC I C I v o I '� — .� U SION Gri c Engineering Group, LLC 3 0. P.O Box 7061 - I 100 Cummings Center Suite 224G INLAID CONCRETE , MA 01915)y CROSSWALKS & ADA RAMPS STOP SIGN I Bever --I AT MAIN ENTRANCES AND STOP I Tel: 978-927-5111 WALL BAR Fax: 978-927-5103 ALL — MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 16 LOT 232 #2 SALEM , MA BI N /F T. CONC. PARKING MAP 16 PROPOSED M YER S FENCE / MAP 16 LOT 235 --� I MAP 16 L0 N/F / I PAR ING MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 T 380 PATTISON SITE LAYOUT 8--� SP 233 N/F N/F -j Z. ( CES) PATTISON PLAN E #1 I CSWIGGIN SPERIDAKOS T i'f GRAPHIC SCALE — — SQ-41% 1'=20' 3 20 0 10 20 40 BO EETa TR [3 EA VER U71 1=-7�-�� --- - Job No, 700 3 0' WIDE c 3A Fli a Name: P�F�S -b C— W FEET ) (pUBLIC WAY inch = 20 ft. a Q& 6/20/12 - - - - -- _ — SB DH \ ( 1 HARMONY GROVE RD . ) / -x- SQ. FT FND & HLD � 20909 ' Q I 0. 48 ACRES \ I NORTH RIVER CANAL TI H AL i �� HISTORIC HIGH ,� I �c METAL \ WOOD BRIDGE W/ 8" . PIPE REMEDIATION /AREA WATER LINE 1 DECK— El.. 9.2± (SEE SHEET C-10) \ 0/ I _ I I I U m MAP 16 LOT 239 m Q F-- �-- ( 3 HARMONY GROVE RD . ) EXISTING I— �-- U wIU W HISTORIC HIGH BRIDGE - U WI (� W w w 35, 561 SQ. FT. WATER LINEf-- w I— w Q = 1 Q 0. 82 ACRES ABUTMENTS < = Q Z STOP SIGN AND STOPBA Y TRANSPORTATION BAR TYP) 11 + -� , i IIiIII - 111111111111111 fill +4+H4+44-H, IS ! {� iI{ I , Illilllll1111 I I i I FH-_f I�1 1 1 1 ! I 12 BIT. CONC. PATH Eg LQCJ _ DUMPSTER RET AREA _ GR L. 9. 6 -�- -' B -. LACK R PROPOSED �— 5 � ��`�`---��' WLL TO P ED ES TR II A N I NDIC I _ W _ BRIDGE AMP ® �_ BJ T \_. 9, 6 TYP �_ C ON C. P — �_ ._ � TH _ 1 3/11/13 ADD REMEDITAION AREA No Date Description P POS B DIN #1 W ARA E U ER Revisions FEN C EN CL ED (47 UNI ) - TR H & CYCLI G P OP STO AGE A A PR OSED ED (�J - / 1 (TYP CH B LDING g ERA CO RETE '�► W GA L INS 2 �P OF qs S EWAL AGE # sq U ROBERT �y TYP 2 TYP) m 7— N� R G H' a GRIFFIN -' PER UILDI ) 3 :; V J TS I CIVIL #36686 .- PR OSED rKE °F 3 ® _ - = E RA � (TYP 2 HIST RIC IGH 3-H43 1 PER UILDI ) AT LIN V 9' Urif Engineering , Group, LLC V r P.O Box 7061 1 100 Cummings :Center, Suite 224G 1 N Beverly, MA 01915 Tel: 978-927-5111 V �- Fax. 978-927-5103 V I _ , . , . . .... .. . .. MRM PROJECT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- - M A-N AGSM EN T, LLC 16 . SALEM, MA MAI 16 LOT MAP 1 1224 LOT 225 MAP 16 SHEDSITE LAYOUT N /F , X34 N/F OT 227 # DO 28 SHE T C N LEY TUCKER I PLAN N/F LAWSON #32 GRAPHIC SCALE S� 1"=20' 20 0 ,o zo ,� 80 Job No, w 700 — M AP 16 LOT 230 1 I IN FEET C 3B N/F � FIe Name: P�P�S�h—b 1 inch = 20 ft. 6/20/12 DEMEULE P 1 T . I NEW GRANITE CURB INLAID CONCRETE EXIST. AND CONCRETE CROSSWALK AND CURB CUT SIDEWALK AT EXIST. ADA RAMPS AT — MAIN ENTRACE CURB CUT 1 / GIO-1/ 1 SII STOP SIGN , A-- HISTORIC HIGH 0 AND STOP WATER LINE / / `( �� �QQ .- BAR 00 , LAG .0 VA 25 WIDE NORITH R1 S. E. S. D . SEWER / / / � - — — WOOD Bac METAL � � „ / BRIDGE W/ 8 PIPE EASEMENT,- DECK= EL. 9.2± PROPOSED VEHICLE BRIDGE. U 1 (SEE PLANS BY MCBRIE, LLC) _ �-- 1 = 3 UwlUw REMEDIATION AREAW W EXIST. ~ vowo! i (SEE SHEET C-10) Q = 1 Q = MAP 16 LOT 378 — — RAILROAD :2 Cn 1 :2 _ — — ' CROSSING — , ( 5 HARMONY GROVE RD . ) — EASEMENT EN T _ -0 44, 432± SQ. FT — STOP SIGN 1 1 . 02 ACRES - - AND STOP 0 BARTYP 1 i -TR PROPOSED R .R . FENCE [jSETTSSACHI i -� MAs �- _ i 1 ADD REMEDITAION AREAND 1 3/11/13 RELOCATED MATERIAL CELL 4�S � M . 01 E C O N S U C T — o No Date Description R . TR AC M _ _ _ RAI OA D OSSIN — �— 1 Revisions R — I SEE P NSB VANA E — Ii J _ _ — — — i I & SSQCI TES) —o M BULK TRASH 70/ MONITORING — � - - STORAGE AREA - � WELLS NDIC WITHIN FENCED _ TYP OF 4 � RAMP � � � s ( ) ENCLOSURE ROBERT 6 (TY q= o GRIH. FFIN CIVIL ' v 9 #36686 rn ' Ii I P. MAP 16 LOT 216 RELOCATED i N /F I MATERIAL CELL — I FENC E I GRASS I TR H 8 RAYMOND (GRASS) N O = STOF _ • = 1 (TYP c _ 8 — I In • ul , Engineering - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I q- Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 1100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G PAINTED Beverly, MA 01915 CROSSWALK 1 _ Tel: 978-927-5111 (TYP U.N.0.) , _ - Fax: 978-927-5103 sToN RE7. ET w I MAP 16 LOT 236 MRM PROJECT MAP 16 LOT 217 ���— MANAGEMENT, LLC I (64 GROVE STREET) SALEM MA N/F '77T77zzzl//l/ SARKES 234, 152 SQ. FT. #12 5. 38 ACRES 1 #6 1 SITE LAYOUT a. PLAN MAP 16 LOT 218 BPD DISTRICT S N ]�F R2 DISTRICT 1 GRAPHIC SCALE (PUBLIC WAY FLORES 20 0 ,a zo 40 � s� 1"=20' N0 Job • 700• . z , ( IN FEET ) File Names p/p/S/h-b C- 3C MAI 16 L 0 T 1 inch = 20 ft. #41??4 Dd16/20/12 J I — -- — ' SOIL.�TEST E IT 1DA�T)A (10/17/11) -SEE SHEET C-4B- Q DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 0-80 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH �- _ �--- 80-120 C1 S 10YR 5/4 SINGLE-GRAIN, LOOSE, VARIES ACROSS PIT C) W I U wNO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES ROOTS TO 108" w 001 0 ESHWT: <5.9 (>120") W LIMIT OF WORK '�' v��ER Q = Q = / ZONE S TP-2 (EL. 17.6) DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER (n DISTURBANCE _ _ _ v 0-54 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH ° "�.,. 54-64 A FLS 10YR 3/2 GRANULAR •� 64-74 B LS 7.5YR 6/6 FRIABLE, BLENDS WITH A LAYER TEMPORARY 74-120 C1 S 1OYR 4/4 MED. SAND, VARIES ACROSS PIT ' - AUTHORITY NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING NO MOTTLES R . R . TRA�.,KS SILT SACKS ' ESHWT: <7.6 (>120") fl---�-}-} ; -}-� ; I TYP OF 4 CB) H- H- �� I-T- l i I liltI ( ) TP-3 (EL. 17.3) DMH 11 DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 0-24 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH ' LJ /-- D D D @ CB17 24-36 A/B FLS 10YR 3/2 GRANULAR GPAD � !7i�t� D D D 36-120 C1 S 1OYR 4/4 MED. SAND, ' V�SS D _ _ =t�--� C NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES 9 5 CB18 ® D - �- 1Ox0� - 7 ESHWT: <7.3 (>120") EROSION 9x � �� I NOTE: SOIL TESTS PERFORMED BY. J. BLANCHETTE P.E. ON 10/17/11 n O � CONTROLS & x LIMIT OF WORK SOIL TEST PIT DATA (4/11/12) --�_�e. 5 o EXISTING O� Q S TP 2A (EL. 18.0) ----_____ DISTURBANCE DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 9. -4- - STORAGE 0-78 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH AREA Q �- NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES PROPOSED SINGLE-GRAIN, LOOSE, VARIES ACROSS PIT =�® ® PROPOSED EXISTING p ESHWT: <8.0 (>120") OUTFALL #4 OFFICE x 7 _ INV.-2.3 � DEPT HORIZON HORIZON 5) TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 9 E N BUILDING 9X0 o 0-60 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL BRICKS LITTLE TRASH 60-72 A B LS 7.5YR 6 6 FRIABLE BLENDS WITH A LAYER I/ic- CB16 / / R1 , � � 72-120 C1 S 10YR 4/4 MED. SAND, POCKETS OF COARSE SAND CA � ® 9 6 � NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES _ RAN 1 Grp ESHWT: <7.5 (>120") oTID11TE 9 PERC. TEST 1 ® TP-2A K ® vim # �. ® � ►�� Q Ch PERC. RATES: 1.7 MPI, DEPTH OF PERC = 90 LL 0 s ®� TOW � _ � � PERC. TEST #2 @ TP-3A - L. g � �� � , ..._ PERC. RATES: 3.3 MPI, DEPTH OF PERC = 96" PROPOSED a 9 ® � gL OC OUTFALL 1 NOTE: SOIL TESTS PERFORMED BY: J. BLANCHETTE, P.E. ON 4/11/12 � � �lliiiillll WALL INV.-2.0 - 2 0 )ADED ��_ _ CB21 T CON ® cam •� !�O V/ PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE TW 2 �RL SDC' PA TN �� EL. -, UPGRADE EXISTING CB5 DMH4 DMH11 INV 12.0 _�� _ RL_ _ �'-� �' 6=L RIM=19.00 RIM=19.20 RIM=9.30 � Q CAI�CHBASIN WITH INV.=16.00 l(in)=12.25 (18") I(in)=5.60 (12") ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA 1,,- Y _ RL _ - DMH7 '� ,� NEW PRECAST BASIN I(in)=15.88 (12") I(in)=5.60 (12") 3 3/11/13 LINES. L V CB6 RELOCATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. W=21 .0 -R�� - _ �- �` 1� \� WITH 4 SUMP & RIM=15.25 I(out)=12.15 (18 ) I(out)=5.50 (12 ) 2 10/1/12 ADD RAMPS. 9 �\ , HOODED OUTLET. INV.=12.25 1 9/10/12 ADD LIMIT OF WORK/ R� DMH5 5' DISTURBANCE LINE. / P 11 ` ��-\� S CB7 RIM=15.40 RIM=20.75 ' PROP. 6 ROP�SE D _ RIM=14.00 I(in)=9.43 (18") INV.=11.50 No Date Description : ROOF LEADER � ° B�J� PROP. 6 0 - WQS2 .= INV.=11.00 I(in)=12.20 (12 YD) MIN. 1 .5� SLOPE W� G LD/NG - Q I(in)=12.20 (12") YD412" Revisions AR/� GE U #3 ROOF LEADER _ cr , 16. &18 I(in)=12.20 (6") RIM_16.00 ` YD TO DMH3 C47_ NDER MIN. 1 .5% SLOPE C) 1 � RIM=9.00 I(out)=9.33 (18") INV.-12.70 JN/ T TO DMH7 �� INv.=6.00 w n S) rn d- DMH6 WQS2 '- 100 GRG- 1 TRD1 / CB21 RIM=14.40 STC 900 1 G " RIM=10.75 ,.-•-..:__.. �.• .R� _ OF � � � RIM=9.00 I(in)=8.95 18 f PROP. 6 0 / ( ) I(in)=7.50 ,�ti� ass x = RSR /ZO 21 . \ INV.=6.00 I(in)=10.60 (12") _RL-� ROOF LEADER \ I(out)=s.85 (18") I(in)=9.00 (6") » moa ROBERT 0 7 \ TEMPORARY \\�/\ CONSTRUCTION CB22 I(out)=7.25 (1s ) IH. F MIN. 1 .5% SLOPE o \/ RIM=9.35 GRIFFIN HP I 5�j � o ® TO DMH5 ENTRANCE INv.=5.50 DMH7 WQS5 #X86 Q c' (DROP MANHOLE 20x82 ��- � �- � t RIM=9.55 ) STC 900 i' RL_ P p TRD1 I(' )-5.50 (6") RIM=9.60 GLEAN OUT ,,__..RL \ M H 6 \ (TRENCH DRAIN) I(in =4.96 (12") WIER_6.5 RL D RIM-10.95 ) I(in)=4.75 (12 ) 3.11.13 _ I(in)=6.80 (18")» I(in)=4.75 (12") D � 1 ,____ � (TYPICAL) _ . _.._ _ 0 00 o c� g ,�.. \ INv.=1o.40 - \ �p D Z ,� _ �L B6 C ) ` f� I(out)=2.45 (18 ) I(out)=4.50 (12") 1 TW-28. 2 :20-� n�-- F �l x30 ✓ �^ 4-�* Z D D D ``mss C� ��� *YD4 TO BE 4'0 MANHOLE WITH 2' SUMP AND BEEHIVE GRATE �� :u - U j \ aX 174 CB7 �, 'f�� (NEENAH MODEL NO. R-4340-C) --•= T -3 �- TW=22.0 TW=20.0 =� LIMIT OF WORK/ PIPE SCHEDULE � \- - Gri 34- \ Engineering _ -- -- -- 3�6.._. r _� .-.- _ ' , �.-• _ - \DISTURBANCE PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE Group LLC YF) 4 , -� _ DMH3 to DMH4 166.8' 18"0 1.5% SHALLOW � \ X22 \ \ \ �� CB5 to DMH4 5.9' 12"0 2.0% P.O Box 7061 �"\ » 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G �-�, ��� � \ DMH4 to DMH5 181.2 18 � 1.5% _.�00 = �- � �� � ` SWALE _ _� �� \\ � `24 i � -'►•• � �� \ \ TEMPORARY Beverly, MA 01915 RO i - - 32 `�� �_� \ SILT SACKS CB6 to DMH5 2.6 12 2.0% - \� 2 \ \ S TeL 978-927-5111 �-- �� ► N 1 (TYP OF 4 CB) \ YD4 to DMH5 26.0' 12"0 2.0% -\ �� \\\ SCA( N N \ Fax: 978-927-5103 ETAI N I N G WALL :. . 0 \ / O -� DMH5 to DMH6 15.3' 18"0 2.5% ALONG TOPC137 to PPRO ° 6 -_� - I �6' \ DMH6 to 20.0 12'0 2.0% MRM PROJECT AIL, SHEET C17) GEOGRID REQ'D �� ALL J WQS2 53.6 18"0 2.5% LIMIT OF � ` MANAGEMENT, LLC E AVATIO IN WALLS GREATE 38-x- LIMIT OF WORK/ TRD1 to WQS2 32.3 CPO 4.3% 16 LOT 232 THAN 11 ' EXPOSED DISTURBANCE #2 WQS2 to DMH7 15.5' 18"0 3.0% SALEM, MA N F BIT. CONC. PARKING HEIGHT / NOTES: " / 1 ° MAP 16 PROP. 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TCS BE CAPABLE OF C621 to DMH7 104.0 12 2.0% MYERS LIMIT OF WORK/ I FENCE / SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. DMH7 to OF#1 14.6' 18"0 3.0% #10 LOT 235 2) DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING CB16 to DMH11 81.2 12 0.5% I TURBANCE 0 MAP 16 MAP 16 N F / CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET-C-7 ARE PROVIDED -� LOT 38 0 / FOR PERMITTING ONLY. CB17 to DMH11 30.0' 12"0 1.3% GRADING, DRAINAGE & MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 PATTISON 3) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING EROSION CONTROL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. DMH11 to WQS5 150.0' 12"0 0.5% 233 # N /F N /F 4) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ' #1 / C S WI G G I N P A TTI S O N PROPOSED GROVE STREET ENTRANCE. C618 to WQS5 32.4 12"0 3.9% PLAN s 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. WQS5 to OF#4 39.3' 12"0 5.6% ' K SPERIDAKOS GRAPHIC SCALE NOTE - ALL DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED _ - PLASTIC PIPE OR RCP. SGS= 1"=20' R sTREETr, - 20 VE F0 10 2D 40 80 1 - Job No, 700 [3EA I 11117-17=7- - ' N 3 0' WI D E) ( IN FEET ) Fie Name: p/p/sA-b C- 4A � WA Y � inch = 20 ft CD� 6/20/1 2 _ -- - - - 12„ VC 1OUTFALL I PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE 12" VC _ \ ORK/ � I-j,3� I CB1 YD3 12" * DMH12 � I I,- OUTFALL - RIM=20.80 RIM=25.50 RIM=9.60 \ ' INV.-17.80 INV.=14.50 I(in)=3.45 (24") � \N K#7. �y I CB2 DMH1 I(in)=7.50 (6?)) RIM_20.80 RIM=21.00 I_(out)=3.20 (24") \ INV.-17.80 I(in)=l 7.30 12 D C63 I(in)=17.65 (12") WQS1 \ ' �\ RIM-- 20.00 I(out)=17.20 (12„) STC 900 #3 N O R TH RIVER CTIDAL \ 1NV.=17,00 RIM=20.30 DMH2 I(in)=15.15 (15") WOOD 8c METAL � I CB4 RIM=20.20 I(in)=16.45 12" EROSION RIM=19.80 I(in)=15.90 (12") I(out)=14.90 (15") BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE DECK= EL. 9.2± CONTROLS �c INV.=16.80 I(in)=16.90 (12 ) I(out)=15.80 (15") WQS3 LIMIT OF WORK/ CB1 2&13 STC 900 RIM=10.0 DMH3 RIM=10.30 DISTURBANCE ' INV.=7.00 RIM=20.43 WIER EXT.=6.5 13 lig`I7N I(in)=14.85 (15") I(in)=5.30 (24") Q0 � . BANK#14 CB20 I(In)=16.00 (2-6") I(out)=5.20 (24") = U II ' cQ RIM=9.00 l(out)=13.10 (12")** BAN� 71 ` INV.=6.00 ) )= BANK#1 EXIISTING *(TOINFIL. FIELD _ U , / -- BRIDGE CC II UCC RIM=21.75 DMH10 5' 0 MH W w INV.=12.75 RIM=10.25 QABUTMENTS Q = Q YDI(in)=5.45 (24�) RIM_ 75 I(in)=6.90 (12") NV=1 .50 I(in)=6.90 (12") I(out)=5.35 (24") EROSION CONTROLS & LIMIT ' *YD3 TO BE 4'0 MANHOLE WITH 2' SUMP AND BEEHIVE GRATE \ /4 Y r7 I OF WORK DISTURBANCE TRANSPORTATION (NEENAH MODEL N0. R-4340-C) 111111 111 T� S__ II1 I iTT T TI-I T ►� TI Tf IT fI I I I� � I i _ i PIPE SCHEDULE 1-4 illilill 1111 PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE TOP 0� ff CB1 to DMH1 98.6' 12;;0 0.5% �8 -�� \ =® CB2 to DMH1 7.4 12"0 2.0% / \ \\ PROP.. =`® � COASTAL ' C DMH1 to DMH2 131.8' 12"0 1.0% BIT./ CONC. PATH 10x6 \ OUTFALL #2 GR'��JrT �� ® 9 5 CB3 to DMH2 5.4' 12"0 2.0% �- -� C INV.=,3.0 E LO �� p BANK E PLUG ALL EX IJ f . ��1, �� ( DMH2 to WQS1 66.5 15"o 1.0% -° C 1 \ OUTFALLS ALONG �'�LL t� m ® CB4 to WQS1 17.8' 12"0 2.0% D D -,� WQS3 S 3 \ �D H 1 \ TQ �/�/ �� x5 _r H..kT.__-- -� D D --- p �- p D �� ALONG CANAL WALL. �(_ �-___� � [ WQS1 to DMH3 3.2' 15"0 1.5% 12x H10 RAN! T 9• ��,` / DMH3 to DMI-14 166.8' 18"0 1.5% CB 13Rid "L Q » �= R� I DMI-19 to DMH10 166.4 24 0.5% =� L LCB12 to DMH10 7.1' 12"0 1.4% TD ' ' CB13 to DMH10 7.1' 12"0 1.4% \ �� CB2�� B� T.' �"® � ��= 9. 6 �- DMH10 to WQS3 5.0' 24"0 1.0% 3X RL �I --- RC"---- -- RL L RL X O �rpn __ ' 2 3/11/13 UNESADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA 10 PA TH ® � WQS3 to DMH12 86.5 24 0 2.0% r 1 9/10/12 ADD LIMIT OF WORK/ 3 - t !- ® CB20 to DMH12 56.0' 12"0 2.0% DISTURBANCE LINE. 10 PROP. 6 / _ / � �_� -► UX� DMH12 to OF#2 10.0' 24"0 2.0% No Date Description ROOF LEADER PROPOSED BUILDING #1 ` TW=23.0 _ _ _ Revisions MIN. 1 .5% SLOPE W GARAGE UNDER / �� �X8 NOTE - ALL DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED / ` ' PLASTIC PIPE OR RCP. I TO DMH12 ( 47- UNITS) ` INV.=13.0 0 -V 0 WI 23.0 G R G= 13. 0 TW=22.0 R SSE � T PROP. 6 � I D - BU'LD' EF- 23. 0 ROOF LEAD R CLEANOUT / GARAGEG `r9 #� „�� so ROBERT C- I . MIN. 1 .5% SL E (TYPICAL) D `-----� X47- �N�ER '�GRgp CD GRH. FPIN . •, a € TO DMH3 D _ V = > CIVIL `� NI TW 22.0 A I YD 1 / D S) I \ \ � � 36686 � x0 . p INV.=12.0 R RL RL RL RL 2 D �- R GR p 3 �3 X. _ - - _ 1 �\ -'<�6 2 X 2x45 x X �_ Lx1 \ PF_ • 0 ~ `7 I ___ - - - - - - - HP \ 2ED 0x3 ® Grif , ' - - - ____ Pot � I I CB 2 �-21�r82 CB1 D --- p 18 - - , - - --� �.., \ _ _ R� I YD ` Engineering D _ CCB 3 \ - _ 1Q� Group, LLC D ® x -'20- ---D P.O Box 7061 �I - - - .- - - -�� --- -- - 2 - - Dh �--- -14- -92 - � X , t ' _ 100 Cummin s Center Suite 224G - \ -22- - _- - - 21 �\ -_ `p -9 --+ - 12"x18" B'everl , MA 01915 =27.5 TW=28.0) TW-28.5 ____ --- -`.- _.._ � �\ __--- �\ � ® TEE y TW --- - - - - - -24- / --26-- -- =30� \ �2.0 -_ __ DMH p \ HP I T(e�• 978-927-5111 i '�. 21 7 i TP-3A �_ ' .4 �� 20X82 Fax. 978-927-5103 21 68 22x68 LLQ j _ ------ - _ . D --TP OST 26 �D OP -I ._._._._._._._. ._:_._._,-_•_.--•- c� •- \ � __ TP '� p �I _ MRM PROJECT --__ - _ --98- -- -- -30 7=3Z_ -� - �-= •�_ _-___ --� \ p MANAGEMENT, LLC - -. s=- - - --34 -- -�- `• - ��4--c - 21 x30 T =28. 2 D - _ - _ _ - - Y-a. SALEM, MA __ _-- _ I M - - •- ..,,�:_.:. NOTES: _�-`_ \_ �_ _ ��- �.�,•_` _ •,� --- - �„ 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TO BE CAPABLE OF SHALLOW -38- -- �, 34._.._ SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. - LIMIT OF WORK/ 0 4p _ -.7 C)- -��'3� �`�' �_ •�'� 2 DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING MAI 16 LOT MAP 16 SW:ALE - DISTURBANCE �\ ��-- ��`- o�c - -�34- CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE PROVIDED 224 LOT 225 �- - - � FOR PERMITTING ONLY. GRADING, DRAINAGE & MAP 16 ____ _____ 3) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING EROSION CONTROL #28 \ SHED � i DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. N F #34 N /F LOT 227APPROX. - - I A 4) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. PLAN T C NLEY I TUCKER APPROX. N /F LIMIT OF LIMIT OF WORK/ TW-32.0 20 0.9 I LIMIT OF I EXCAVATION DISTURBANCE RRO I . I I EXCAVATION 32 LAWSON PROP. INFIL. FIELD I FISH f POND X ❑ \ GRAPHIC SCALE S I I 25 WIDE x 90 LONG I BLOCK RETAINING WALT , 20 0 10 20 40 80 1 -20, BTM FIELD = 12.5 MAP 16 LOT 230 x W/ SWALE ALONG TOP Job No, 700 � I BTM CHAMBERS = 13.0 GARDE SEE DETAIL SHEET C17 IN FEET C- 4B INV.= 13.0± (12 0 HEADER) N/F ( ) n He Name: p/p/s/h-b (SEE DETAIL, SHEET C-7) DEM EU LE X I E 1 inch = 20 ft. D� 6/20/12 ' MAP 1 T -- - -n BLSF STORAGE VOLUME COMPARISON �, EXIST. �J � INSTALL FRAME & PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE pN' EXIST. CB (ECB) �� SOLID COVER G PROPOSED INCREMENTAL CUMULATIVE CURB CUT RIM=8.10 8.10 ON ECB CB8 DMI-18 54 ELEVATION EXISTING 024 `P`� / RIM=11.15 RIM=10.25 RANGE (FT) STORAGE (CF) STORAGE (CF) CHANGE (CF) CHANGE (CF) ` `� {� {�,� 7 to 8 17,654 19,160 1,506 1,506 I(IN)=6.80 � / INV.=8.15 I(in)=7.00 (12�) / CB1 I(in)=7.00 (12") � Q I OU T --5.85 / cB9 I(in)=7.o0 (15") 8 to 9 27,182 27,446 264 1,770 �� ` ' ( / RIM-10.20 9 to 10 49,593 50,123 530 2,300 INV.=7.20 I(out)=6.90 (18") II 10 to 10.8 58,259 61,303 3,044 5,344 -��, 0 / SEE NOTE 6 RI109 8o R MH 9.95' NOTES: �P`� --'"�-8- --- = " 1) THE UPPER BOUNDARY OF BLSF IS THE 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE (ELEV. 10.8'). (''� INV.=6.80 I(in)=6.40 (12") 2) NO REGRADING WORK OCCURS BELOW ELEVATION 7.0' EXCEPT FOR THE LOCALIZED / l(in)=6.40 (12") RIVER WIDENING ASSOCIATED WITH BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION. i EROSION , I CB14&15 I(in)=6.40 (18") 3) CALCS INCLUDE 60 & 64 GROVE STREET AND 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. NO / �� � RIM=9.55 I(out)=6.30 (24") REGRADING WORK IS PROPOSED ON 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. / �I� CONTROLS & 12„ VC INV.=6.55 .ver GO � LIMIT OF WORK WQS4 LIMIT OF WORK/ 0 � 5 i ® OUTFALL C619 STC 450i I�cE (DBLE GRATE) RIM=10.0 DISTURBANCE �( � /� - DISTURBA 1=4.3� RIM=s.o - " P I I(In)_6.45 (12 ) (` / / BANK#7 + INV.=5.9 I(in)=6.45 12" VAV `��1`/ �� � / \ :. \ - --_=� I(out)=6.20 (12") ( P pv' / / 8 0 CB23 / f RIM=12.25 TOP OF i B PROPOSED INV.=9.25 ,gi OUTFALL 3 ' O i , COASTAL -� 7 # N O R TH R 1 VE *CB23 TO HAVE BEEHIVE GRATE (NEENAH MODEL 25 WIDE BANK AI 3 INV.-4.0±_ �- NO. R-4340-C) S. E. S. D . SEWER WOOD 8c METAL i /�A t BRIDGE W/ 8 PIPE PIPE SCHEDULE EASEMENT _ �.._ �g � � .s • t:_ DECK= EL. 9.2± PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE ® ' O / amino � AN #7 1 v J ®. --=� CB8, to DMI-18 19.7' 12"0 5.8% , v 3 PROVIDE RIP ' /�► C69 to DMI-18 16.9' 12"0 1.1% -� 0 U . C; �1�C , BANK#2 �-- RAP ARMOR AT 75 ` U �--� CB23 to DMI-18 70.5' 15"0 3.2% P/ WING WALLS (TYP) �� �' \ DMI-18 to DMI-19 23.1' 18"0 2.2% GR G S / .; _ BANK#1 MAX. SLOPE 1 .5: 1 (H: V) \ 1 I- ± �-- cB10 to DMI-19 1s.8' 12"0 2.4% EROSION 9x I �U W W " CONTROLS �c �' EXIST. \ I \ \ IF- W W CB11 to DMI-19 7.6 ' 12' 0 5.3% LIMIT OF WORK � QS � I I \ Q = ' �� DMI-19 to DMH10 165.0 24"0 0.5% / RAILROAD \ \ CB14 to WQS4 14.5' 12"0 0.7% . . . _ DISTURBANCE ,� I \ " _ I CROSSING 14 -� - - CB15 to WQS4 7.9' 12"0 1.3% _ �- K#6 EASEMENT 9 83 -�- WQS4 to OF#3 52.5 12"0 4.0% _ _.--- A N K 5 f C B 15 c619 to ECB 2.0' 8"0 5.0% NOTE - CB19 to ECB IS TO BE 8"0 D.I. PIPE. ALL OTHER DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED TTT TTi PLASTIC PIPE OR RCP. 3 3/11/13 ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA BANK#4 PROPOSED TR ACK LINES. REVISE C610, CB11, - R ' BRIDGE NOTE: DMH8 & DMH9. ADJUST FENCE GRADING FOR RELOCATED _ -r BANK#3 I 1) DETAILED BRIDGE PLANS MEETING AASHTO �- 11 _ STANDARDS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. MATERIAL GELTABED BLSF USETTS �- BANK 2 C HP 2 11/6/12 ADD NOTE 6. M ASSA -- 5 1 9/10/12 REVISE CB19 INVERT. ADD LIMIT BANK#1 ---- -- 1 x OF WORK DISTURBANCE LINE. No Date Description S - -- y -\ C B 9 D D - DD _ C�;-�" _._.- -- ----- ----- -- ,� _-- -- \ \\ �M H� -I- H� Revisions R . �R - r 4x41 - -- - - , - -\ Qo 0 WH IB- _ - - - = - - -_- _-t-- �2 - BLOCK \ \ CB8 \ - _ =-_ RET., WALL q� MONITORING Ja TOW'-14.5 � 9 - "�/ �--- \ 13x ©$ ROBERT WELLS I 1fl s H m (TYP OF 4) I ► �/ �U F� o GRIFFIN y �\ CIVIL ' ► I r �- C'•''� - I \� o� \ PROP. 6"0 -� #36686 ► / _ _ TW 18.0 \ \ �p ROOF LEADE 24 �� `�� \ MIN. 1 .5% S1 I MAP 16 LOT 216 S �� - _ _ - I3. I - \ TO DMH12 S. I N /F �`'� 6 -�? �,...� I BLOCK RETAINING WALL ` \ \ TW A IES RAYMOND 8 \ I \ � (SEE DETAIL, SHEET C-7) - TW=23.0 e ► X20 w \ �\ - Grirrin - a �� �- \CB23 3 2 `\ I 16x0 \ \ LIMIT OF WORK � 24- -� _ _ �- 26 � .\ � Engineering / _ _ �- -3 _ \ TW=16.0 ��• •� '� Group, LLC DISTURBANCE = •= - - - - 28 -�- -``�- - - \, TW=30.0 TW-22.0 \ i. - _ __ \ \ 12x85 •� ®� P.0 Box 7061 101 � R L- 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G ,-- "- •'" ___ --_3 � _.---� \. 3Z L--• _ -a- _ . - - Beverly, MA 01915 • •_• LIMIT OF ' ``' \ 1\ �• \� -,\ _ -'\ .� \� 176 x Tel: 978-927-5111 PROPOSED �`` `2 \26\ \ \ \\'� \` `' Fax: 978-927-5103 ENGINEERED ST \ �� = _ NOTES: B AR R II E R O' " \ \ \ ~� � 115 ♦. '�`- L -_ . 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TO BE CAPABLE OF MRM PROJECT �� `� ` SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. I \ `32 3O \ \ \ �\ \ CB 1 2 DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING MANAGEMENT, LLC MAP 16 LOT 217 \ \ - �� \ �o APPROX. \�� •�� \ \ �' \ ��•� - CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE PROVIDED SALEM , M A / \ \ \. FOR PERMITTING ONLY. N F �.,. LIMIT OF �' \ \ \ �' SHALLOW \\� •\ \ 3) DETAILED BRIDGE PLANS MEETING AASHTO STANDARDS SARKES EXCAVATION +� \. SWALE \\` \ \ \ � � 2 - _ REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. #12 \ \ \� ��• 4) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING \ \ \ \ ��` \ �\ DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. �T LIMIT OF WORK TW_ 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. / �\ \ \ \ _ _ 6) CONTRACTOR TO VIDEO INSPECT HARMONY GROVE ROAD GRADING, DRAINAGE & #6 DISTURBANCE \ DRAINAGE OUTFALL PIPE FROM EXISTING CATCH BASIN. BASED OIN �� 21 68 INSPECTION RESULTS, ENGINEER TO CONSULT WITH SALEM CITY EROSION CONTROL BLOCK RET�'I�NtNG WALL •�• ENGINEER REGARDING NEED TO REPLACE DRAIN LINE. SEE l32� W� -SWALE ALO TOP ---' �� _•_ PLANNING BOARD DECISION. PLAN MAP 16 LOT 218 8 �� SIL VER (SES-DETA1 L, -&H EET C- N/F -- 30-- GRAPHIC SCALE (PUBLIC WAY FLORES ..I NW-UMMM -- _ \ / ____ 3 4 zo o 10 20 40 so ..._3 - ! - ,lob No, 700 z - _ -- _ C- 4C 0 - 38 --38- ( IN FM Be Names P/P/s/h b G,qMAI 16 L 0 T 1, inch = 20 ft. 4 E D� 6/20/12 M < 1� U W I U W I— 1 00' B W W USF Q = IQ ERZp t _ �E S S n T AUTHORITY o I R . R . TRACKS Illf-kWHIIII 11 IvQKI ,llj1ll Jill EGPAH[wG ------ p p vr-IDED _ p _ p D ----- D p D O C PSTER �0 O AREA � EXE EXISTING 4" S --- o wA TER • 9. 6 -I-- STORAGE -� SMH2 AREA RIM=10.3 I EXISTING (0 INV.=6.65 I OFFICE SEE -� NOTE 2 BU 9. 6 � I 0 BUILDING o �� S z H ER 4-1 C _ 7G1DRA�� SEx�s T 6 SEWEIR S � ck SMH3 ET• WqS O � RIM=10.3 LL 7o _ S W _ GRA INV.=5.70 8„0 SDR35 PVC ��• 9. 6 -{- -- — RL � S 8 0 SDR35 -� � eLoGK S-0.004 FT/FT 8"� _ RL P Vc E T -- DING 41EG S S_0 --_ gJ AL VICE. C7 VICE. R�'DED RL' 004 FT F �T CON Q w - 0 P E. I _RLQ S / T ��=D C' PATH E�.. � -- -� RL_ S � 9. 6 ADD w RL SM H 4 ABAN DON EXIST. 1 3/11/13 LINESFORAD RIVERFRONT AREA WATER SERVICES REMOVE ALL PRQPos PROP. 8"0 s-1 RIM=10.3 � –� S No Date Description ED BUILD/NG � � INV.=5.50 TSR _ & VALVE PIT PER I EXISTING ON STIE W1 GARA PVC BUILDING S� EX1S�• wAVv Q CITY STANDARDS Revisions UTILITIES UNLESS Rq G �3 SEWER SERVICE. ®® O ,.. E UNDE NOTED OTHERWISE. (4- ;7, U R MIN. 2% SLOPE. ,0 1 L� N/ TS) EXIST. WATER MIN. 18 1 Qp B� W VALVE wv F� SEPARATION MDC TRAP 2 Cl- zzzr E'f� �,p _ # �O SPIT NEAT CROSSING RIM 11 .25 O �PrAss9 G �' T o u t =7.0 o EXIST.ST. 8" WAT R� MH S � H � G = ( ) F o ROBERT y -I- G y o W 1V`1CY1 m � IST. 10" 5 WER �'��' S PROPOSED a GRIFFIN w _L` - W YY E/� L S � � 36686 � YY ESMH G �� TRIPLE GATE G R S s ” VALVE 'gyp I WG � G y � RL � — G nM �� � f. G D D x p v N D ------ G— D --- G z `e p D G G _ W o MERS ;� W W - U Gri .._ ..: :-� f in CONNECT TO m Engineering .:�, ,.:._ , .. . . _.... . . . . Ya PROP. GAS SERVICE EXISTING SMH �' � Group, LLC REMOVtE & RESET PROP. SEPARATE 4"0 SIZE BY UTILITY RIM=11 .30 UTILITY POLE. POTABLE WATER SERVICE & • PROVIDER INV.=5.15 P.0 Box 7061 PROP. 8 .0 C L D I G 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G 200 S � RISER DOWN TO FIRE PROT. SERVICES. SEE PIPE. MIN. 5' (SEE NOTE 2) � Beverl , MA 01915 �"R I ETC XFORMIER PADS. y � pM ET NOTE 1 &3. (TYP EACH BUILDING) COVER �. S t4 C-z Tel: 978-927-5111 WALL Fax: 978-927-5103 l _ ALL MRM PROJECT I � MANAGEMENT, LLC 16 LOT 2322 SALEM, MA N F I FBIT. CONIC. PARKING / NOTES: / MAP 16 PROP. 1) FIRE PROTECTION BUILDING SERVICES TO BE SIZED BY MECHANICAL M YE R S FEN CE / ENGINEER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. L #1 MAP LOT 235 2) EXISTING SEWER SERVICE IS CURRENTLY BRICKED—UP. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE BRICK AND VIDEO INSPECT EXISTING SERVICE CONNECTION TO THE MAP 16 N/F / EXIST. SEWER SCHEDULE MAIN. CITY TO DETERMINE IF SERVICE IS ACCEPTABLE FOR REUSE OR MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 LOT 380) P ATTI SON ESMH1 NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. REPLACE SERVICE WITH 10" SDR35 PVC IF REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR TO REBUILD INVERT AND REPAIR DAMAGE FROM UTILITIES PLAN / 233 #6N/F RIM=10.26 BRICK REMOVAL. N/F #1 A� PATTISON INV=3.08 3) COORDINATE BUILDING SERVICE LOCATIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINE CSWIGGINDRAWINGS. 4) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND. L SPERIDAKOS ESMH2 — STREET RIM=11 .28 GRAPHIC SCALE S •_ — — 1 .28 � 1 20 VERINV=5.13 40 0 20 40 SO 160 11111713 JL7[3 E: A _ .. - .. . ,lob No.: goo 30' WIDE) I V1 01 Jill 5A file Names C- P U B L I C WAY in h �40 )fi» P�P/s —b \ Ddl 6/20/12 01 pip 4Fi -- - — -- - - fl OU TFALL 12 VC I,— OUTFALL I-5.3f �1`�K#7� T. N NOR TH RIVER CANAL Tl D A L WOOD & METAL \ BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE REMEDIATION AREA 1 DECK= EL. 9. 2± (SEE SHEET C-10) BANK#9I �- BANK—K11 BANK#10 # BANK#14 UIm m�, Q I BANK#12 BANK#13 BANK 15 EXISTING U W I U Ld REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE U w l U W < W 1 LU H PUMP STATION & ABUTMENTS ~" w I �-- W Q = Q Q = Q = -� FM „ FM FM FORCE MAIN. CUT & W)A � � 1 .5 FORCE MAIN CAP EXIST. 4 SERVICE — U I .2 V) — — —/ Ld 13: R TA PON BA Y wTRANSPO1 11 1 1 ill 11 1 11 1 111111 Ill" 111111111 1111 11 H444-'1441 +-H���Hllllllll JillrT i I II IIIII1111I111 I TOP OF COASTAL I BIT. CONC. PATH .� �� GNrT ' — I SMH1 � gL0 BANK DUMPSTER .. - � C� RET. AREA RIM-11 .00 PLUG ALL EX ST. DD — p _ NV.=7.45 OUTFALLS ALONG D — F - DD D CANAL WALL. EL. � RA Nr T 9. 6-+ � E 13L0c SMH2 1 �n RET - � �/,��L RIM-10:3 1 y o S ® --� TO �/�/ a INV.=6.6 5 Y ^l`� Br T -- _E� 9. 6 + RL RL RL RL RL S 8„ �_ CONC ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA PROPOSED �Q, S SDR35 PV _ A TH 1 3/11/13 LINES. i 80 D.I. BUILDING S S=0. 0 ,4 -� No Date Description PROPOSED BUILD1 SE R SERVICE. 04 F-7-/F- # ®® T � Revisions W/ GARAGE NDER MIN. % SLOPE. S FENCE ENCLOSED s ( 47 NITS) S © s 1_ TRASH Bc RE�Y �Yo PROPOS 0 S SIN STORAGE AREA CONNECT FLOOR E� BUI 1 (TYP EACH BUILDING) w� G LD/N?-)#2PROPOSED 8"sb DRAINS TO MDC TRAP. : ARA GE PVC BUILDING fo�� s9�y (TYP EACH BUILDING) D ---�_ 47_ UNDER 4�EGRq� s ROHERT m �® MDC TRAP #1 D -______D (�r�rr S SEWER SERVICE. I GRIVILIN x �, MIN. 2% SLOPE. #3668 E I RIM=11 .80 - D p RL RL RL I(out)=8.0 RL— RL ® ® D _ �-K. _ :f RL _ D `.:`: REMOVE EXIST. 3 DRAINAGE SYSTEM ti. W W W W G �_ 1 rw rMN w G o RLGfirrin � � D w G �- R�� I Engineering � — D p-- -- " -- -, Group, LLC Jill a PROP. 8 0 CLDI � PROP. SEPARATE 4"0 D D _ G c� � ; ��-~ . P.O Box 7061 i PIPE. 5' COVER POTABLE WATER SERVICE & D D G 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G RE PROT. SERVICES. SEE D — Dp w -� G Beverly, MA 01915. N 0F0 1 &2. -EACH tiYo I TH RZJ��- 1 _ p w G --tom Tel: 978-927-5111 ,, N G B U I L D I �B 0 C K S -- _ D �/ �Y�� Fax. 978-927-5103 D _ MRM PROJECT Ar.PROP. HYDRANT -- f U MANAGEMENT, LLC I , . P OF 3 ---_ �� 10 D SALEM, MA � � PROP. CONCEPT PAD INFILTRATION �' IELD MOUNT TRANSFORMERS MA 16 LOT MAP 16 a (TYP OF 3) 1 � I NOTES: 1224 LOT 225 MAP 16 to1) FIRE PROTECTION BUILDING SERVICES TO BE SIZED BY MECHANICAL 2 Q SHED 1 ENGINEER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. UTILITIES PLAN N /F X34 N /F OT 227 84;;q, 2) COORDINATE BUILDING SERVICE LOCATIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINE y I C N LEY I TUC ER # DRAWINGS. N/F 20� I ETC 3) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND. I I I LAWSON � R� GRAPHIC SCALE Scat 1~=20' C 400 20 40 80 Iso Job No, 700 MAP 16 LOT 230 1 C— 56 a j N /F ( IN FEET ) File Name: p/p/sA—b 1 D E M E U LE I inch = 40 ft o 6/20/12 M P 1 3 EXIST. Q EXIST. CB (ECB) Z-0CU �B CURIM-8.10 n I(IN)=6.80 I(OUT 5.85ID , \ 0 V �-- -- o 12" VC S / OUTFALL .......... 00BANK# 7 I=4.3 VA TOP OF ,-- B - LUG EXIST. ' COASTAL CONNECTION NORITH RI 25 WIDE BANK / ' �� (SEE NOTE 2) — S. E. S. D . SEWER ,., , WOOD 8c METAL BANK#4 BRIDGE Wf 8" PIPE EASEMENT / DECK= EL. 9.2± BAN # NK#8BANK BANK#3 9# GX3��' L fn BANK#2 BANK#1 _ _ � wUw - W ' W EXI ST. Q RAILROAD = � ER D . U) --- � BANK 6 CROSSING # EASEMENT — BANK#5 _--- BANK#4 PROPOSEDTRACKS f R .R . BANK#3 FENCE -A4+H4+ _ —ETTS � - - US -� ��- ADD REMEDITAION AREA AND j . BANK 2 C 2 3/11/13 RELOCATED MATERIAL CELL �- 5SA BANK#1 1 11/6/12 ADD NOTE 2 PER S.E.S.D. M D D _ D D No Date Description R A CKS -1- D RM Revisions.R � r I - - O — - - - BULK TRASH MONITORING � - - STORAGE AREA ss WELLS ROBERT 9y H m (TYP OF 4) ENCLOSURE ��. Y CCVLN i 0 � � ' ! C` © #36686 gU r FSR 100 t PROP. 8 0 CLDI RELOCATED PIPE. 5' COVER MAP 16 LOT 216 REL � FENCE E N �F w MATERIAL CELL TRASH 8 (GRASS) RAYMOND SIN STOF ABANDON EXIST. (TYP EAIGriFf i In. j 6„0 WATER MAIN � ® Engineering BEYOND �- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ – _ _ – _ _ - - - - - - - - J CONNECTION Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 RL R 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 TeL 978-927-5111 Fax. 978-927-5103 STONE RST 0 ® MRM PROJECT ��� �'Q '� MANAGEMENT LLC MAP 16 LOT 217 _ N F SALEM , MA .�`� V 6x8 PROP. SARKES TEE PIPE. #1 • I _ #6 MAINTAIN EXISTING NOTES: �P 6"0 WATER MAIN ' 1) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND. UTILITIES PLAN 2) CONTRACTOR TO PLUG EXISTING S.E.S.D. SEWER CONNECTION IN • CONNECTION TO MANHOLE ON NORTHERLY END OF EXISTING WOOD & METAL BRIDGE. MAP 16 LOT 218 REMOVE FRAME & COVER AND HAND OVER TO S.E.S.D. PERSONNEL. �y SIL VER N E BEAVER STREET ' FILL MANHOLE WITH COMPACTED GRAVEL AND ABANDON. / GRAPHIC SCALE S -_ ' (PUBLIC WAY FLORES � ' -20 40 0 20 40 80 1610 Job No•: i7TTTT �00 z M A S 16 L O T ( n1 FEET ) �� p/p/s�—b C- 5C -----� #4 1 inch — 40 M D� 6/20/12 i i I SEE TABLE OF 3000 PSI CONCRETE }' INLET PIPE FINISH THRUST BLOCK AGAINST GRADE BEARING AREAS UNDISTURBED - \ / FOR THE AREA MATERIAL _ OF CONCRETE 45 REQUIRED MAX. ~` '' GROUND SURFACE SEE TABLE OF THRUST BLOCK ^ WATER MAIN BEARING AREAS _ ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX • " FOR THE AREA . OF CONCRETE /�\\�� COVER SET AT FINISHED2'0 OPENING IN TOP AND COVER REQUIRED FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. z GRADE W C) ;r, H 450 TAPPING TEE. MAX. CONC. COLLAR CONFIRM SIZES FLANGED / PLAN OF THRUST : •• 12" MIN. '_` " PRIOR TO CONST. BOLTED GATE BLOCK AT BEND VALVE // H�2 MAX. ADJUST TO GRADE PRECAST WITH COURSES ECCENTRIC CONIC. =: '. OF BRICK CONE OR COLLAR CL 52 CLDI WATER FLAT TOP MAIN CONE 0 STEPS PRECAST RISER TEE / \ ��\\\/ 3000 PSI CONCRETE BACKING AGAINST PIPE 0 WATER MAIN UNDISTURBED MATERIAL PER PLAN GATE VALVE RISER CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK AT PLUG GROUTHRINK 4 N. T. S. - N.T.S. •• BASE PRECAST MANHOLE 3000 PSI CONCRETE Min. BASE BACKFILL TO SUBGRADE W/ AGAINST 45° MAX. � '• '�• i '' L»--•6" Min UNDISTURBED CLEAN GRANULAR BACKFILL ' COMPACT TO 95% MOD. PROCTOR CLEAN GRANULAR BACKFILL MATERIAL SEE TABLE OF S'TONEUBASDE s NO STONES LARGER THAN 3" I THRUST BLOCK BRICK MASONRY OR COMPACT TO 95% MOD. PROCTOR ® BEARING AREAS 3000 PSI CONCRETE PLAN OF THRUST FOR CONCRETE REARA NOTES: AS REQ'D 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. BLOCK AT TEE REQUIRED 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. IN./LINEAL FT. AND 0.12 SQ. IN. (BOTH WAYS) BASE BOTTOM. APPROXIMATE. LOCATION 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. 12" WATER, SEWER, OR DRAIN. SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 4. LEBARON FRAME AND COVER CATALOG NO. LA246 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. SET AT MINIMUM DEPTH OR EXACT LOCATION TO BE 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. INVERTS AS INDICATED. DETERMINED IN ADVANCE 6. TONGUE & GROOVE JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIN. 2" MIN.* °o°°°°r° ° °°°° GROUND SURFAICE OF CONSTRUCTION 7. SEE FORCE MAIN CONNECTION DETAIL SHEET C-9. 060000 ° o 0 ° 8. FOUNDATION SUPPORT FOR STRUCTURE PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. o 3000 PSI CONCRETE 4'0 PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE °nn_° ` ° BACKING AGAINST SEE TABLE OF HYDRANT TrO- BE t 0 0 000 00 0 6" MIN - BOTTOM UNDISTURBED MATERIAL THRUST BLOCK AMERICAN IDARUNG ° 0 0 0 00 AND SIDES o. B628 OPEN) RIGHT. 45 BEARING AREAS CtMAIN N.T. S. i 3/8" CRUSHED STONE MAX. FOR THE AREA NOTES: OF CONCRETE FINISH ' OR SCREENED GRAVEL BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION PROVIDE JOINT RESTRAINTS ADJUSTABLE VALVE GRADE REQUIRED 8.,.� COVER i (TIE RODS OR MEGALUG) FOR x ALL JOINTS WITHIN 15' OF 45' j g * FOR DUCTILE IRON OR RCP PIPE: TOP OF STONE IS MID-DEPTH (SPRING LINE) OF CONDUIT. BEND, WITHIN 20 OF DEAD •, , N END HYDRANT, AND WITHIN 15 _ " OF MAIN LINE TAPS. 6 FLANGED & BACK UP HYDRANT WITH REVISE CURBING AND SIDEWALK .,•_ ''•'- BOLTED GATE-,,,,,, 6 SQ. FT.. 3000 PSI 1 6/20/12 DETAIL TO CONCRETE. - TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING SECTION VALVECONCRETE PLACED 45' BEND GROUND No Date Description S AGAINST ATER AL-NDISruRBED ROTATE AS REQUIRED SURFACE R 3000 PSI CONCRETE Revisions N . T. S. BACKING AGAINST 000° Y-BRANCH THRUST BLOCK SECTION UNDISTURBED MATERIAL. 000 SEE TABLE ON THRUST oO' °' ° PROVIDE 10 CU. FT. PLAN BLOCK BEARING AREA 3/8" CRUSHED STONE TO , BROOM CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK FOR THE AREA OF /�\ °0 12" ABOVE DIRAIN HOLE. 6"0 PVC 4 MIN COVER CONCRETE NCRETE REQUIRED. \ 4' WIDTH U.N.O. BUILDING SEWER FINISH D x 6" HYDRANT 6" FLANGED MIN. SLOPE 2% S. M . SLOPE TO DRAIN * GRADE N•T.S• TEE OUTLET WITH VALVE RESTRAINING SPOOL PIECE(S) FLAT STONE OR '° �0 - �- �Qr ROB 4" o o • JOINT CONCRETE BLOCK „gs A. � GR FFIN � ' °•'° ' ° TABLE OF MINIMUM BEARING AREAS IN SQ. FT. GRAVEL BEDDING SEWER MAIN CIVIL 8„ •.o 00• o �� #36686 • . •° AGAINST UNDISTURBED MATERIAL UNDISTURBED , ��'�" 6x6-W1.4xW1.4 WWF MATERIAL PREPARED VMRE MESH TYPICAL HYDRANT ASSEMBLY WITH DRAIN '/ SUBGRADE GRAVEL PRESSURE 150 PSI SECTION Z BASE 3,000 PSI COURSE CONCRETE PIPE TYPE OF SOIL CONDITION N.T.S. BUILDING CONNECTION SIZE BEND * WALK TO BE ADA COMPLIANT UNLESS NOTED A B C D E F G N .T.S. Aw Awiff OTHERWISE. MAX SLOPE = 1/4" PER FOOIT TEES & In 8.5 4.5 3 2.5 1.5 1.5 1 Grn ' PLUGS En ineenn CONCRETE SIDEWALK6 9' g N.T.S. and 90 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 1.5 Group, LLC 45 6.5 3.5 2.5 2 1.5 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 smaller P.O Box 7061 22 1 2 3.5 2 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G TEES & 15.5 8 5.5 4 3 2'. 1.5 Beverly, MA 01915 PLUGS -TRENCH WIDT KEY- 8" 0 q, 0 0s� " _ _ o Tel: 978 927 5111 90 21.5 11 7.5 5.5 4 3 2.5 FINISHED GRADE °° 00o,5000 0 0°0 1• 1.5 CLASS 1 BIT. CONCRETE TOP COURSE Fax. 978-927-5103 TYPE 1-1 (M3.11.0 -TABLE A). 45 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 2. 2" CLASS 1 BIT. CONCRETE BINDER COURSE M3.11.0 - TABLE A . 22 1 /2 6 3 2 1.5 1 1 1 s" WIDE YELLOW o ° ° o 0 ° o ° ( ) 12 MARKER TAPES °O o o 00 ° 0 00 3. 12" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE MRM PROJECT BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CURB TYPE OF SOIL CONDITION :.,'- `• _' -= SUB-BASE (M2.01.7) CONCRETE - - - - - - -j �' 4. COMPACTED SUBGRADE MANAGEMENT, LLC 2'-0' MIN. WELL COMPACTED '':` - - �•''- -- TOP COURSE FINISH GRADE A - SOFT CLAY, FINE LOOSE SAND - = �- 2'-6" MAX. CONDUITS (TYP.) FILL FREE OF > ��j� ` ,, SALEM, MA B - SAND & CLAY; MIXED OR IN LAYERS; FINE CONFINED SAND LARGE STONES 2 BITUMINOUS 6 /��jj��\ �/ C - HARD DRY CLAY y CONCRETE �` D - COARSE SAND BINDER " E - GRAVEL COURSE O 12 F _ SOFT ROCK00 FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT "' 66 O� I CEMENT CONCRETE G HARD PAN cC� _ r L_ „ NOTES: N.T.S. o II._ 1. FOR FITTINGS WITH LESS THAN 22 I'DEFLECTION USE BEARING AREAS FOR 22 BEND. //� SPACE APPROX /�� DETAILS COMPACTED 1�f1�1 COMPACTED3 APART (TYP.) N GRAVEL BASE SUBGRADE 2. JOINTS SHALL NOT BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE. BEARING AREAS MAY BE DISREGARDED FOR NOTE: TRENCHES IN ROCK WHERE THE TOP OF THE ROCK FACE IS AT OR ABOVE T-HE CROWN OF2" MIN. TAMPED SAND GRAVEL BORROW ALL AND DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE SHOULD MEET THE GRADATION THE PIPE. HOWEVER, CONCRETE BACKING SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE PIPE AND ROCK FACE. ABOVE AND BELOW CONDUITS SPECIFICATIONS ESTABLISHED IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY " CONCRETE CURB DEPARTMENT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES". THESE LAYERS SHOULD BE PLACED IN LOOSE LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED 12-INCHES AND BE COMPACTED TO % •_ N.T.S. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREA UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TRENCH AT LEAST 95 PERCENT OF THE MATERIALS MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DERTERMINED BY S � ASTM DESIGNATION D-1557. fob No, 700 N.T.S. FOR MULTIPLE CONDUITS C- 6 NOT TO SCALE Fde Nine: p/p/sA-b Q -9-t& 12/20/11 E " 15" CHDPE PIPE 12 8 18"0 CHDPE FROM WQS#1 OVERFLOW INV. 14.85 12" 8" INV.=14.75 8» 24" 48" _ STORMTECH SC-740 DMH3 7. -=•. SOLID END CAPS STORMTECH SC-740 OPTIONAL TOP SLAB 48" PT# SC740E CHAMBERS,( TYP OF 60) INSPECTION FRAME & COVER BTMOFO 5 BED SQUARE FRAME AND (TYP OF 5) SPACE 56 f O.C. OPTIONAL TOP SLAB BTM EL. 13.0 TO GRADE. (TYP COVER SET AT FINISHED OF 3) 12". CHDPE INV.=13.1 FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. SQUARE FRAME AND GRADE GRATE SET AT FINISHED FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. GRADE COMIC. COLLAR CONC. COLLAR 12" MIN. g" 12" MIN. ` `:� 12" ADJUST TO GRADE 12" STORMTECH WITH COURSES o PTOBMANIFOLDLE # 1552AN74115 CONE , '.' 24 ADJUST TO GRADE >} OF BRICK 25 WITH COURSES $„ �'•, (TYP OF 2) OF BRICK CONE : . 24st ={ STORMTECH CHAMBER END CAPS ,`' a PT# SC740EPE12B RISER a 48" i I (TYP OF 5) 48" (TYP U.N.O.) (SEE NOTE 8) RISER ;. .4 9o' _ 1' STONE 12"0 STORMTECH .- 5" PERIMETER INFILTRATION FIELD DETAIL PT• MANIFOLD 46END PIPE SIZES PER PLAN ON SIDES # PIPE SIZIE PER PLAN & END N.T.S. BASE 48" SUMP MIN. OIL/DEBRIS (HOOD BASE -= "SNOUT" TYPE BY LEBARON •-� OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT FINISH GRADE. PROPOSED PAVED PARKING LOT NATIVE FILL. 6" CRUSHED a s 6' STONE BASE ' " • 4 SMALL CAST IRON FRAME & COVER (H20). BRICK MASONRY OR 3000 PSI CONCRE ,. 6" CRUSHED 3 8" CRUSHED STONE SET ON 2 GRADING RINGS & MORTAR BED STONE BASE 3/4 - 1.5 INCH WASHED, / OR 2 COURSES BRICK AND MORTAR. SECTION VIEW 6 CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE GRANULAR WELL-GRADED OR SCREENED GRAVEL PLACE CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND NOTES: SOIL. 95% COMPACTION 6" THICKNESS MIN. STRUCTURE. 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. SECTION VIEW 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. NOTES: FILTER FABRIC 7 OZ/SY BELOW GRADING RINGS FT. AND 0.12 S IN. BOTH WAYS BASE BOTTOM. 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. NON-WOVEN, WRAP 96•� INSPECTION PORT WITH SCREW-IN CAP IN./LINEAL Q ( ) INFIL. FIELD COMPLETELY SC--740 CHAMBER 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. 60 CHAMBERS PROPOSED MAX. LOAM & SEED 3,000 PSI CONCRETE 4. LEBARON LA-246 FRAME & SOLID COVER (MARKED DRAIN) OR APPROVED IN./LINEAL FT. AND 0.12 SQ. IN. (BOTH WAYS) BASE BOTTOM. EQUIVALENT. 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. (5 UNITS WIDE, 12 LONG) 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 4. LEBARON LF-248-2 THREE FLANGE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. V JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIN. 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 6. TONGUE & GROOVE =III= f -- ;•= •- TION SUPPORT PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 6. TONGUE & GROOVE JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIIN. _ _ - . -.7. FOUNDA II-) `-- _ 18 4" PVC RISER =""- 1 EOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. -I7. FOUNDATION SUPPORT PER G 8. DMH 5, 8, 9 & 10 TO BE 5 0 PRECAST MANHOLES. - _ To -)I I Ji-`Jv o�o� 0 0 0� o � �o -o -o - ou ate' " MIN. '_-.� _-S .._--•- " REVISE INFILTRATION FIELD6 (vV{in. 18 MAX. 1 6/20/12 SC 740 CHAMBERS. ADD MIN. TYPICAL MULTIPLE INLET PLAN PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE 4'0 PRECAST CATCH BASIN �IiIIaaaa � ::�-i :• VIEWTORECAST RAIN DETAIL _ r��)) ��� 30" REVISE PRECAST DRAIN :III \ a (\Q� a a MANHOLE AND YARD DRAIN = c� DETAIL N . T. S. N . T. S. ► I-I _ o- o, ,, o o, o =III _ _ - - - - - 6 NAin. INSPECTION PORT TO BE _ _ = I - ATTACHED THROUGH No Date Description _ I I I=1 11=1 11=1 11-1 11= I I=I I I_I I I_ I I I III I► III .I I III=III=1 11=1 ►- KNOCK-OUT LOCATED a -'I►-III=)I I=I(I I I SC-310 CHAMBER 49"± BTM OF SC-740 5 AT CENTER OF CHAMBER Revisions BTM OF FIELD ELEV. 13.0 51" 12" MIN. TYP. FILTER FABRIC 7 OZ/SY ELEV. 12.5 NON-WOVEN, WRAP INFIL. ESHWT 8.4' FIELD COMPLETELY R I rLer Rjr eINSPECTION PORT DETAIL MATERIALS- Concrete Pipe Division MATERIALS Concrete IPlpe Division TYPICAL CROSS SECTION N.Ts. 9 STORMTECH SC--740 CHAMBER. SYSTEM o ROBERT ti ' STC 4501 Precast Concrete Stormceptor STC 900 Precast Concrete Stormceptor N.T.S. GRFFIN `� CIVIL (4 5 0 U.S. Gallon Capacity) (900 U.S. Gallon Capacity) 11)) P OPOSED FIELD DIMENSIONS 25'X90'. O�o� #36686 �e " 2) MANUFACTURED BY STORMTECH OF 20 BEAVER ROAD, SUITE 104, S 240 Outlet WETHERSFIELD, CT 06109 USA 888-892-2694 Frame and Cover (No Grate) Stormceptor Frame and Cover 32"0 pip 6"0 Orifice S" Grade Adjusters To 2,d. !2-,Suit Finished Grade Grade Adjusters to Plate Suit Finished Gra 5 19 a - c 24" 8" " DRAINTECH POLYOLEFIN 60 Oil a. n Port 12"0 ATRIUM GRATE ■ ■ A. 4"0 ri Varies To PLACE 3" THICK LAYER Min.15" High 72 fb d OF 1 STONE ® GRATE. n 4 w - " Match Grade Inlet Outlet " ' Engineering 4 Cap -- MIN. 18 ALL AROUND. SLOPE TO DRAIN Group, LLC Stormceptor Stormcept& COMPACTED „ Insert " Insert Outlet Weir 'a EARTH P.O Box 7061 40 Oil Port * Inlet Inlet Weir Access opening 6"0 Oil _ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Outlet See Note __ P 9 Beverly, MA 01915 4"0 Outlet 6"0 (See note #2) Port =1 I=III= - , a Plan ViewRiser Pipe Orfce I = I 1 I Tel: 978-927-511118„ Plate " �I-I�I-I�I-I�I-I�I- III-1 - -III-I�I- 6 0 Oil =1 I I=111=III=1 I I=1 11= �' p ' I=1 I I=III= 1 I_- " Fax: 978-927-5103 Weir Port 12 o CORRUGATED ° DEPTH -I I I-I I I-I I I-I I I-I I I-I I I=III=1 I I-I I - HDPE RISER Uro Tee 24"0 outlet AS REQ D 1=1 I IIII I II 11I I I1 11I I I1 I II I II I I� 0 a 6 " Inle Pipe 24"0 Drop �� y- MRM PROJECT 12 0 Inlet 4"0 Outlet M'n. * Inlet Outlet Outlet Pip •' Pipe =1 I I=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11= MANAGEMENT LLC Down Pipe Riser Pip - � '=1 I I-III-III-III-III- , - (Removable) �. �- � _I�I=1 11=1 11=I 11=1 I SALEM, M A " _ - a � «nLEr - '=111=111- 0 48"0 *If Require $ - - ° •- _a 12"0 CORRUGATED a • ° `° a a Inserft Tee Here Section Thru Chamber 6"0 Orifice j HDPE 90' ELBOW W/ MIN 2% SLOPE 12"0 HDPE E na- g Access opening GASKETED ENDS (Tee Opening to Face Side Wall) Plate - Section Thru Chamber Plan View (See note #2) COMPACTED CRUSHED Multiple Inlets STONE BASE DETAILS II 3 Notes: Notes: y 1. The Use Of Flexible Connection is Recommended at The Inlet and Outlet Where Applicable. 1. The Use Of Flexible Connection is Recommended at The Inlet and Outlet Where Applicable. 2. The Cover Should be Positioned Over The Inlet Drop- Pipe and The Oil Port. 2. The Cover Should be Positioned Over The Outlet Drop Pipe and The Oil Porrt. YARD DRAIN #18c 2 3. The Stormceptor System is protected by one or more of the following U.S. Patents: #4985148, 3. The Stormceptor System is protected by one or more of the following U.S. Patents: #4985148, #5498331, #5725760, #5753115, #5849181, #6068765, #6371690. #5498331, #5725760, #5753115, #5849181, #6068765, #6371690. N.T.S. »_ NOTES: Sc-QL% 140 4. Contact a Concrete Pipe Division representative for further details not listed on this drawing. 4. Contact a Concrete Pipe Division representative for further details not listed on this drawing. 1) THE BASIS FOR THIS DRAWING IS DRAWING STD-1110A PREPARED fob No, 700 Rinker 027 Rinker 028 BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. C- 7 a Fe- am PSP/s/h-b DAIC 12/20/11 i C INLET D A B INLET D A B 4" S-6"O 3'-0" 2'-6" 8" 5'-0"0 6'-0" 5'-0" 5" S-6"O 5'-0" 4'-0" 5'-6"x 5'-6" 4'-6" 4'-0" f " r N > w f w , w f w ;; y-• .._. •;: 4,. •`2 .= :: -, . . - : •- _°'.. ^'•a- =:.., x, •! :.:• 8 11/16" 3-6 x 3-6 4-0 3-0 6'-0"0 4-0 30-6- ECONODRAIN NOTES: '. :: `- «` : '-•' 24" ®®®®® �'" ECONODRAIN • - •- • _ ,..t • - f w f w f N f w f p f N r N -�. _ . - •_- ' = � * ' • - .•. • •d ' 4-0 3-8 3-0 6-0 x 6-0 3-0 2-6 1) THE BASIS FOR THIS DRAWING IS DRAWING STD-1001 „ f w » » N r » w 00000000000 00000000000 00000000000 00000000000 ®® ®�® SERIES #6 6 4-0 x 4-0 3-0 2-6 6-6 3-6 3-0 PREPARED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. 0000000000 0000000000 0000D0000010000000000 ®®®®® TRENCH SYSTEM CLAMPING 4'-s" S-0" 2'-s" 6'-6"x 6'-s" 3'-0" 20-6- PREPARED FACE :'� :..= - , _ �... • :!_._ : , ®®®® 6" 4'-0"� 5'-0" 4'-s" 10" ws -J - r ••.A.a:�•i :•: �_ •. -.•_ _ •d•_j •i• �, f w , N f w w 5'-6"0 7-6 6'-6 " 4-0 x 4'-0" 4'-0" 3* -6 DOWNSPOUT - STANDARD - _ r' BOLT 4'-6"0 4'-0" 3'-6" s'-o"x s'-o" 5'-s" 4'-s" PLAN VIEW H-20 CAST IRON GRATE (( (•• VARIES 4'-6"x 4'-6" S-6" 3'-0" s'-o"0 s'-s" 5-s"#EGO8241CIA I( 5'-0"0 3'-6" 3'-0" 6'-6"x 6'-6" 5-0" 4'-0" EPS FORM 06 31% OPEN AREA EXPANSION / ((�( : "- 5'-o"x 5'-0" S-0" 2'-6" NYLOPLAST CLEANOUT FRAME & GRATE 30.2 SQ. INCHES PER LINEAR FOOT - END CAP ADJUST F24'-0" (FLOW=196 GPM) CONTRACTION III—I INLET PIIPE TO BE SIZED BY DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER 1 GRADE I I =III^ PLUMBIMG CONTRACTOR NOTES:INSERTED IN RISER SLOPED FINISHED PIPE DRAIN BOTTOMI-=( FOR INLETS LARGER THAN 10" THE GRADE 6" BUILT-IN SLOPE (0.509) 7- 0.59 TO OUTLET DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS WILL BE 4" ROOF VENTS INJECTION ` DETERMINED FOR EACH PARTICULAR CASE MOLDED y' ECONODRAIN INSTALLATION DETAIL PRE-CAST SEPARATORS ARE TO HAVE - "d • : = ALL SPECIFIED HOLES EITHER CORE :% 45' BEND BORED OR CAST IN PLACE. SIDE SECTION VIEW PAVEMENT INJECTION •, ` MOLDED WT INJECTION MOLDED WT 45' WYE 90' BEND 'r= -. TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM EXTRA HEAVY c.L INLET :' .= ~_ ` NOTES: N.T.S. FROM WASH STAND OR w Q a 1) CONCRETE: 4,000 PSI MIN. AFTER 28 DAYS. FLOOR DRAIN = - Q . • 1/8-LONG BEND C.I. 2) ALL REINFORCEMENT PER ASTM C1227-93. N : , . C.I. TEE 3) TRENCH DRAINS SHALL BE ECONODRAIN TRENCH DRAIN SERIES #6 OR APPROVED EQUAL. GASKETED 6» CHDPE PIPE (TYP) :': 4) BAR GRATE COVER PROVIDED BY ECONODRAIN TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL. a ov WATER ' LINE —� CONNECTION MIN. 19 SLOPE 5) SECURE THE TRENCH DRAIN STRUCTURES to prevent floating during concrete placement. = ROOF LEADER CLEANOUT DETAIL a.= 0 4 OUTLET TO N.T.S. SANITARY SEWER I ALL INLET TRAPS TO BE «d PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE - d d EXTRA HEAVY C.I. PIPE WITH 248 CMR 2.00 MIN. ALUMINUM OR PLASTIC COATED 8wP0URED IN PLACE CONCRETE; •�. - _: 8 SOLID CONCRETE BLOCKS WITH a WROUGHT IRON STEPS CAN BE FULL MORTARED JOINTS,HORZ. AND USED. 8 VERT., PLASTERED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. _Z PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED ' . WROUGHT IRON STEPS SHALLOW LANDSCAPING _ SHALLOW LANDISCAPING SWALE. MIN. SWALE. MIN. / PORTLAND CEMENT MORTAR USED SHALL CONSIST OF 1 PART CEMENT, 3" DEEP 3» DEEP 'a. 2 PARTS SAND. 2.0 2.0'::1:: 6" TH. 4.0'f 6 TH. 4.0 f MIN. 6" TH. LOAM & SEED RIP RAP RIP RAP CEMENT BRICK,HOLLow CONCRETE, OR ALL DISTURBED SLOPE. ~� d e ` CINDER BLOCK MASONRY MUST NOT BE (D50=4") / (D50=4") CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES USED. / MIN. 6 TH. LOAM & SEED / BIODEGRADEABLE EROSION ALL DISTURBED SLOPE. BASIN TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF BUILDING ALL OIL AND GASOLINE MUST BE REMOVED BEFORE / CONTROL BLANKETS WHERE POSSIBLE,COVER TO HAVE A CENTER HOLE. CLEANING OUT THE BASIN, AND MUST NOT BE / CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 12" TH. CLEAN : 24 T BIODEGRADEABLE EROSION 12" TH. CLEAN :24 T _ i RETAINED SOIL / DISCHARGED INTO THE SEWER THROUGH OTHER FIXTURES. GRANULAR FILL -'fJ / GRANULAR FILL --� ` __-J-------------- / A TIGHT COVER MUST BE USED IF BASIN _�_� - / CONTROL BLANKETS IS LOCATED INSIDE OF BUILDING. SPECIFICATIONS FOR COVERING SPECIAL CASES OR 2 9/10/12 REVISE RETAINING WALL DETAIL. 1 : 24 M " :24 I " / CONDITIONS, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL 40 MIL. PVC / 4 PERF. CHDPE UNDERDRAIN 40 MIL. PVC = L_ 4 PERF. CHDPE UNDERDRAIN OPENING SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 24" DIA. AUTHORITIES, AND THE AUTHORITIES OF THE M.W.R.A. ADD LOW PERMEABLE SOIL TO ----------------- 1 6/20/12 / SLOPED TO DAYLIGHT. WRAP -- ---- SLOPED TO DAYLIGHT. WRAP RETAINING WALL DETAIL ' LINER. SOLVENT ' 24 M LINER. SOLVENT I REINFrORCED S01L ' WELD JOINTS : (RETAINED SOIL / W/ MIN. 1 CF/FT OF WELD JOINTS :24 M W/ MIN. 1 CF/FT OF THE CATCH BASIN SHALL BE SO LOCATED AND WROUGHT IRON STEPS SHALL BE SPACED ABOUT 18" No Date Description WALL CRUSHED STONE & 8 OZ/SY WALL ---------_---------------- CRUSHED STONE & 8 OZ SY CONSTRUCTED THAT SURFACE WATER SHALL BE EXCLUDED. APART. 12 DRAINAGE ZONE OZ/ Sy 39 M FILTER FABRIC. HEIGHT =24 M —(3/4' CRUSHED STONE) FINER FABRIC. INLET PIPE SHALL BE AT LEAST FOUR BOTH VENTS SHALL BE EXTENED INDEPENDENTLY 18" Revisions VARIESff --VARIES = ---------------------- INCHES ABOVE NORMAL WATER LINE. ABOVE THE ROOF, OR AS APPROVED BY THE LOCAL / 12 DRAINAGE ZONE / AUTHORITIES, AND THE AUTHORITIES OF THE M.W.R.A. (MAX. 12 ) = 39 M (MAX. 18) 24 M 3.6' I / 3 4 CRUSHED � / WHERE SUBJECT TO FROST OR CRUSHING CONDITIONS, g ( / 3.6' / STONE) --r------------------------ / OUTLET SHALL BE AT LEAST THREE FEET BELOW THE (Outlet pipe to be 45 degree angle) SURFACE. 45 M � / =24 M / / GEOGRID DEPTH -I / CLEAN = - -- ---------------------- THE NEW CATCH BASIN MUST BE FILLED WITH APPROXIMATE LIMITS r- •,. / / WATER BEFORE USING, AND AFTER BEING EMPTIED FOR 45 M / OF EXCAVATION :24 MI / PERIODIC CLEANING. ;F w / / MDC TRAP ����� .�yG _4----------------------- ROBERT ' 60 M I / =24 M / / ----------------------- N.T.S. I.r c � H. m 1 60 B DRAIN TILE '24 B t� CCCIV LIN y / (4" MIN) DRAIN TILE � �#sssas c\� EMBED. EMBED. (4" MIN) VARIES VARIES GEOGRIID WALL NOTES: GRAVITY WALL N.T.S. YPICAL SECTION SHOWN FOR PLANNING BOARD PERMITTING ONLY. CRUSHED STONE N.T.S. CRUSHED STONE . 1) LEVELING PAD LEVELING PAD DETAILED DESIGN PLANS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. (MIN. 12" THICK) (MIN. 12" THICK) 2) RECON SERIES 50 RETAINING WALL BY SHEA CONCRETE SPECIFIED. RETAINING WALL OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY TEXTURE. 3) MINIMUM 109 WALL EMBEDMENT OR 6», WHICHEVER IS GREATER. TYPICAL SECTION 4) DRAIN TILE TO DAYLIGHT (OR YARD DRAIN) AT LOW POINTS, ENDS, AND 5 X "D" - iz� .,< � y N.T.S. MIN. 50' O.C. ,�. ' 5) UNDERDRAIN TO DAYLIGHT (OR YARD DRAIN) AT LOW POINTS & ENDS t Engineering C) 0 C) Group, LLC _ P.O Box 7061 2"x 2" HARDWOOD POST EROSION CONTROL FABIRIC 100 MIN. LENGTH OF 4' (MIRAFI NO. 100 OR EQUAL). �-✓' O BeverCummings ter, Suite 224E MA 01915 AT 6' MAX. O.C. STAPLE TO POST AT 6"' O.C. Y PROPOSED VERTICALLY. CHINK VOIDS AND OUTFALL Tel., 978-927-5111 GROUT AROUND Fax. 978-927-5103 PROPOSED OUTFALL PIPE �1--� 1--1/ /� �•_�' OUTFALL \ v K 2"x 2"x 30" MRM PROJECT 2.5' MIN 28» HARDWOOD STAKES DIA. PER PLAN � � � � 5 X "D" MANAGEMENT, LLC IN EACH HAYBALE. , , DIA. PER DRIVE 6" TO 12" IN �i�® '� , PLAN SALEM, MA GROUND. 5) 5 Min. ��►�';� '', -` ) a (U.N.O.) / , ` ��� ` �� �`i�,' ' �� , SLOPE _ 6" ,;�,►►�,` ,�,�;,�� ) ` I/ 29, MIN.—� EXTEND OUTFALL FLUSH W/ EXIST. t = 7.5 X Deo BLOCK WALL 0 1.5' Min. EXCAVATE SHALLOW } , i ;DES/GN ROCK MATCH EXISTING TRENCH BY HAND & ( I I� I o �v �a R/PRAP o c� DETAILS III BACK FILL AFTER ` t11 GRADES BED 2» INSTALLING FABRIC BUTT TIGHTLY E TOGETHER 5 X "D» PLAN VIEW 050 SIZE S� 1 -40 HAYBALE SILT FENCE RIP RAP=9" ' EROSION CONTROL SECTION VIEW Job No, 700 N.T.S. OUTFALL DETAIL 8 . Fie Nam P/P7S/h-b N.T.S. �— E D ' 12/20/11 p ----------- 24 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1) INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ALONG TOP OF BANK AND LIMIT OF WORK. MAINT&IN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND ADJUST DAILY AS ....................................................... ......=.---•-•.........-••.... ..... ............................. ........................................................................................................................ ................................................................................ ..................................... ............................. 22 '- REQUIRED. 2) DECOMMISSION EXISTING SEWER PUMP STATION. REMOVE SEWER UTILITIES TING BRIDGE. FROM EXISTING.................... ............................................................ ......................... ............................... ........................................................... ........................................................................................................................ ................... ------------------------------------- ----------------------------- 20 *...­ ........................... 3) REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE AND ABUTMENTS AND DISPOSE DECORATIVE:: OFF-SITE. LIGHT POSTS4) STABILIZE EIMBANKMENT WITH RIP RAP. ............................................................ ......................... ................................ ...... .......................................................... ..................................................... ..................................................... ... 18 ........................................................... 5) INSTALL TEWPORARY SHEET PILING COFFERDAMS AT PROPOSED ABUTMENTS. 6) STABILIZE E:XPOSED BANK AND BASE OF WALL WITH RIP RAP SCOUR ..................................%........................................................... ........................................................... .................. ..................................... ............................. PROTECTION. ............... ..................................... ..................... ......................... ......................................................... 16 ............................•••------------ 7) EXCAVATE TrO PROPOSED FOOTING GRADE. ESTABLISH DEWATERING SYSTEM. S.E.S.D. SEWER EASEMENT 42" HIGH GUARD 8) INSTALL FOOTING PILING SUPPORTS. F-T-T-1 . I ........... ..................... ................... ......................... ....................................... ........ ... ... .. ----------•----------------------"---------..- -- --------- .................... 14 --------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------ 10) FORM & POUR ABUTMENT WALLS. FINISH 11) REMOVE SHEET PILING AND FINISH INSTALLING RIP RAP. . .............................. ............................. 12 ........................................................... ....................................................... ...;GRADE........ I L 12) INSTALL PROPOSED STEEL I-BEAM BRIDGE GIRDERS. V 100-YR FLOOD 13) FORM AND POUR CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK. w b0-YH F-LUQU: ELEV. 10.8 ...... 14) CONSTRUCT BRIDGE CURBING, SIDEWALK & GUARDS. ....................................................... ........... ---- --------------------------------------------------- ------ ...................... ... .....1W/ PH-ASE--1&.-L-0 N LY...7------------------ 10 ---------------------------------------------------- -1 v- ELEV. 9.16 15) INSTALL ELECTRICAL CONDUITS AND BRIDGE LIGHTING. V 50-Y�R FLOOD F ELEV. 8.95 16) FINE GRADE APPROACH RAMPS AND INSTALL BINDER COURSE. ..... . ................ .... ................................. ..... .... ........................................................13TM** . .. .................. .. . ... ....................... ............ .. ............ ................... ............................. 17) INSTALL APPROACH CURBING AND SIDEWALK. CO :211 iL�� 3 VMDENING XISTING BRIDGE............ '-BEAMSiiiiiiw SE 18) LOAM AND SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS. EXISTING COMPOSITE 8" TH. ELEV. 7.1 ELEV. 7.(09 BOTTOM OF GRADE 8 ........................................................... ......... ---- ---------*....... • GRADE BOTTOM OF CONC. DECK & 19101 STEEL 1=: BEAM- 19) INSTALL FINISH PAVEMENT COURSE. SEE NOTE 4, :........................................................... ................ .. ........ ....... TEL---I-BEA11---------6�E�---STEEL------------- ELEV;- 8.0± :­*................. ....... 20) REMOVE EROSION CONTROLS AFTER ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABLE. 6 --------------------------- --j-------------------------- I-BEA-M-......... -------------------------------------- ----------------- ------ --- ------------------------------------ ---------*----------------- THIS SHEET ARMOR PROPOSED ------------ ......­ THIS PROPOSED ELEV. 7.2± z- MHW ELEV. 5.0 ARMOR PROP' REMOVE SIDESLOPES ALONG SIDESLOPES ALONG PROP. FINISH PROP. FINJISH .. . .............. . ........ .................. .................................EXISTING..................RIVET"fTOTTROM............ ..............S-OIL.,A-S................... ... ........ ......W1N.GWALLS-4r­BASE................. 4 ............... ------------------------------- ................................WINGWALLS...&1$ASE--- ------ IVE -BOTTOM.......... RIVER BED OF ABUTMENT WITH NECESSARY OF ABUTMENT:WITH 10% SLOPE 10% SLOPE 0=991) (APPROX.) RIP RAP (D5 RIP RAP (13150=9") Y7 NOTES: ----- . ....................................................... ...................... •-••-•-----•---...•--.... ...................... ............................. .............. ........ ..... .............. ................... ..... .. ...... .. . ..................... .. ................. ......................... ................................. ...... - ------ ---- 2 - -- ------------------- 1) 50-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATIONS FROM METCALF & EDDY, JULY 18, 2008 LETTER 38.0 CLEAR SPAN CONCRETE S.E.S.D. ENTITLED "SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM (ENF) 0 1 ABUTMENT : ...... ......(N-0-TE-EXIST....BRID-GE...IS.-.29-0. ............................................................. .. •.................. ............................. .. ........... ............ .. ............... ................................... ....................... ... ............................................................. TYP FOR FLOOD MITIGATION FACILITIES FOR THE PEABODY AREA". REPORT INDICATES 0 INTERCEPTING THAT THE 2006 "MOTHERS DAY STORM" WAS A 50-YEAR STORM EVENT. SEWER CONCRETE: REPORTED ELEVATIONS ARE FOR THE DOWNSTREAM RAILROAD BRIDGE. PILE CAP: .............................................................f�..Y.....d. •..................... •............................. -2 ... .. ......................... .. ................... ........................................................... ..... ................................................................................................................................... C P 2) BRIDGE DESIGN IS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL STRUCTURAL, GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDRAULIC EVALUATION. 3) BRIDGE DESIGN TO IMPROVE HYDRAULIC CONSTRICTION CREATED BY EXISTING -4- BRIDGE CROSSINIG THE NORTH RIVER. 4) CONTRACTOR TO NOT OPERATE HEAVY EQUIPMENT ON TOP OF PIPE DURING BRIDGE CROSS- SECTION CONSTRUCTION. 5) BRIDGE AND ROADWAY TO BE DESIGNED FOR MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. SCALE: 1"=4' POST WOODEN CAP 1� 5'-0"± O.C. (TYP) -----,r RAILING REVISE BRIDGE CROSS SECTION 4 3/11/13 PER STRUCTURAL DESIGN ADA COMPLAINT ADA COMPLAINT 4x4 POST 3 11/6/12 ADD NOTES 4&5 PER S.E.S.D. HAND RAILS HANE) RAILS /--W/ RAILINGS ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 2 10/1/12 59-0" DETAILS. E 1, 6/20/12 WIDEN BRIDGE. ADD 11 11 11 11 11 11 1* TH. TREX No Date CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE PLAN CONCRETE CONCRETE DECKING Description LANDING & ADA LANDING & ADA EL 11.5 COMPLIANT RAMP 0 ANGLE IRON 0c) 00 0c) 00 0 4x4 WOOD 0 0 0 0 COMPLIANT RAMP Revisions FCONNECTION 0 0 POST 0 0 A A 17 El El 18' DEEP PT • A CAST-IN-PLACE A FRAMING CAST-IN-PLACE \__BOTTOM OF BRIDGE 1" TH. TREX GLULAM (1 0.8 ABUTMENT GIRDERS EL 10.8 18" DEEP PRESSURE DECKING 100-YEAR FLOOD-/ CONCRETE ABUTMENT BTM. EL 10.8 TREATED GLUILAM EL 11.5 ELEVATION 10.8 (LENGTH 35 FEET) EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE A-1 10�111� - .. COMPACTED tF COMPACTED 'A z BRIDGE SECTION �V STRUCTURA FILL F GRANITE SCALE 1/2"=l'-O' H BLOCK WALL7-F GFRIF'FIN rT1 A� TOP EL 9.6 CIVIL Ic" BRIDGE ELEVATION STRUCTURAL ZSTRUC EXISTING ROBERT ILL #36686 SCALE. 4' 34--2j- .13 11. A 7. -7 r r MHW EL. 5.0 \\/CONCRETE CONCRETE FOOTING & WALL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOOTING & WALL 7n GrifF PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. FOR PERMITTING ONLY. Engineenng DETAILED FRAMING PLANS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 100 Cummings%Center, Suite 224G. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PARKING Beverly, MA 01915 W/ GUARDS---\ NORTH LOT�7 DECK EL. 11.5 RIVER Tek 978-927-5111 CAN CONCRETE LANDING 24.0' 7.0' 2.8'--7' 5.0'----71 Fax. 978-927-5103 (MAX. 2% SLOPE) CONCRETE EL 9.5 /-STEPS CONCRETE 2.2'tMRM PROJECT EXISTING GRANITE CONCRETE CONCRETE LANDING MANAGEMENT, LLC ABUTMENT EXISTING GRANITE BLOCK WALL EL 9.6± RAMP UP CONCRETE LANDING ---(MAX. 2% SLOPE) 5P-099 ADA COMPLIANT (MAX. EL. 9.5 SALEM, MA BLOCK WALL EL. 9.6± (1-/12-) AX. 2% SLOPE) HAND RAILS (TYP) EL 11.5 7 11 1 1 1 CONCRETE LANDING CONCRETE L (MAX. 2% SLOPE) CONCRETE LANDING RAMP UP ADA COMPLIANT 5.0' EXISTING GRANITE 2.1'± EL. 10.0 (MAX. 2% SLOPE) (1-/12-) HAND RAILS (TYP) BLOCK WALL EL 9.6± EL. 11.5 0.3' CONCRETE-j ABUTMENT DETAILS IV CONCRETE CONCRETE LANDING STEPS \--(MAX. 2% SLOPE) EL 9.75 5. 21.0' 5.0' BIKE E PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE NORTH SC-9L% 1w=40' BIKE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE W/ GUARDS-' RIVER PAP7 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PA DECK EL 11.5 CANA 71 NORTHERLY APPROACH Job No, 700 SOUTHERLY APPROACH SCALE: 1"=4' Ede Name- p/p/sA-b C- 9 SCALE: 1"=4' Dgh; 12/20/11 ........ ----- ---;GR'A1 ---------------- --- -------- - 100 YR FLOOD ELEV. E V_ 0 -8 ............ .. ........... ... --- -­------- ------- . .... ... ------------------SITE ..8-'-'---TH .................BTF COMPO ..... ...... ........... �0 �'EA . . , i .............. TZET 2B. . . .........2.,O�, SED ALONG .. ...... T" 3% MIN. SLOPE (TOP) TEMPORARY 33% MAX. SLOPE (SIDES) EROSION CONTROL ' 6f 4 VEGETATIVE SURFACE (GRASS) FABRIC (U.N.0) G��Aw� " ,�li, ,�li, ,�li, ,�I►, ,�li, .�li, ,�li, ,�li, al►, 12r �S�Pp05�v�G� TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEFINING LAYER. 12" TH. VEGETATIVE 12" GR PLACE STRIPS OF 4' WIDE SUPPORT LAYER 6" TH. TOPSOIL P� ORANGE SNOW FENCE (K MAX. = 7x10_4 cm/sec) O \\`I AT 10' O.C. RELOCATED SLOP��`S\�ERPSS� � x v v v v v 1 CRUSHEDMATERIAL 6' MATERIAL CELL PGE (,G 2' SUBGRADE PREPARATION ���°P�\�1E �' 12" TH. DRAINAGE LAYER 40-MIL HDPE 3'-0» :}: 2' LAYER (6" MIN. TH.) SELECT GRANULAR FILL (TEXTURED) (K MIN. = 1x10- cm/sec) BARRIER ~ ,�� GE 2 \� sect 12 OZ/SY ,\2' POFD �� cR`� 40-MIL HDPE 40-MIL HDPE NON-WOVEN SEE ANCHOR I \�� SVP �X�D (TEXTURED) (TEXTURED) 6" TH. SUBGRADE PREPERATION LAYER GEOTEXTILE TRENCH DETAIL SCREENED GRANULAR FILL (3/8 BARRIER MINUS) M LIMIT OF � CONITAMINATED I Rp,\NPG�PR sec) SOILS 12„ -11 SEv � �'� uBGRP uLPR - �K M\N BARRIER TOE DETAIL 6S�RE�N N.T.S. RELOCATED MATERIAL CELL REST(DRATION PLANTING SCHEDULE 2' AREA PLANTS SIZE SPACING RIVERFRONT RESTORATION 72 EACH OF SILKY PLANT 4 FEET ON CENTER IN A i UNLINED BOTTOM OF CELL. AREA (6,000 SF) - REMOVE DOGWOOD (CORNUS 2-3 FEET HIGH 10-FOOT WIDE STRIP ALONG 2' RELOCATED EXCAVATE EXISTING SOIL SLUDGE BEDS. REPLACE DOWN TO ELEV 11.Of AMMOMUNA) AND SAND BAR THE TOP OF RIVER BANK WITHIN MATERIAL CELL AND COMPACT SUBBASE. EXCAVATED MATERIAL WITH WILLOW (SALIX EXIGUA) THE RIVERFRONT RESTORATION CLEAN FILL. PROVIDE AREA MINIMUM 8 INCHES OF BTM = 11.0+ LIGHTLY COMPACTED TOPSOIL. 20 EACH OF RED MAPLE SPACED EVENLY THROUGHOUT i RESTORE TO ORIGINAL (AGER RUIBRUM) AND 6 FEET TALL THE REMAINING RIVERFRONT COMPACTED SUIBBASE GRADES - ELEVATION QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS RESTORATION AREA COMPACTED SELECT MATERIAL. 9.0+/-. i TREMULOIIDES) LIMIT OF I GRANULAR FILL PLANT WILLOW SHRUBS AND GEOMEMBFRANE 20 EACH OF MEADOWSWEET SIKLY DOGWOOD SHRUBS UNIFORMLYINSTALL (SPIREA TOMENTOSA) BLACK 2-3 FEET TALL THROUGHOUT THE REMAINING ALONG BANK TO ENHANCE ESHWT EL. 8.7f CHOKEBEBRRY ARONIA LIMIT OF i � MIGRATORY FUNCTION OF THE ( RIVERFRONT RESTORATION AREA _ LOST BANK. MELONOC,ARPA), ARROWWOOD CONTAMINATED (VIBURNUM DENTATUM) SOILS TYPICAL ENGINEERED PLANT REMAINING SHRUBS AND TREES TO RESTORE AND NEW ENGLAND EROSION APPLY AT ONE-HALF BARRIER SECTION ` STABILIZE RIVERFRONT CONTROLS/RESTORATION MIX SEED �MX SUPPLIER'S RECOMMENDATION - 1 RESTORATION AREA. FOR MOIST SITES** USE APPROXIMATELY 2.5 ANCHOR TRENCH DETAIL N.T.S. (OR EQUAL) POUNDS FOR ENTIRE RESTORATION AREA. N.T.S. ** SEED MIX 1S AVAILABLE FROM NEW ENGILAND WETLAND PLANTS, AMHERST, MA 413-548-8000 No Date Description AREA �. Revisions REMEDIATION ( 3 .:.� H AR M-0 N Y G R 01VE R / EROSION NOTE SCALE: 1„=30' C NTROLS 1 REMEDIATION WORK TO BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OFA / / 12 VC LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL. 50 / _ LIMIT--�F�WORK j 2) REMEDIATION AREAS TO BE IMMEDIATELY BACKFILLED :WITH ROS ,Tf e S - -D I STU R B A OUTFALL CLEAN GRANULAR FILL AND STABILIZED. �` _ 61 =l=ift BANK#7 1 I 4.�± 3) REFER TO RESTORATION PLANTING SCHEDULE PREPARED BY UIVIL WETLANDS & LAND MANAGEMENT, INC. OF DANVERS, MA.A-0.000 v �� � I g,P/ � �8 � V MV-4 .7 NOR TH RI VER CANAL TIDAL \ 66� GROUND SURFACE �.- 3 �= -, WOOD �c METAL ° REMOVE FORMER SLUDGE EROSION BRIDGE W 8 PIPEriftin L-7 SLOPING CONCRETE A :6 _ / BED 1(15x100 ±). WOOD CONTROLS Bc --� t:_ DECK— EL. 9.2± PAD to, . / SIDES TO REMAIN LIMIT OF WORK/ Engineering / LLC AN up 3'-0" 6' LENGTH OF �'� / �� - _.�,--` ---^-- DISTURBANCE Group, 1 PVC NON-SCREENED 3 rr .. �� OM 6 I.D. D'CASING RISER (SCH. 40) REMOVE FORMER :::: o cfl '�� l�T ® � - B AN K X14 P.O Box 7os1 ® At 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G 2' MIN. BENTONITE PRE—TREATMENT 75 °; BA 1-z�-- --F_ _ Beverly, MA 01915 GROUT SEAL BASIN (11x30 ) & • . BANK#1 Tel. 978-927-5111 RESTORE. WOOD 9x ____ �, Fax: 978-927-5103 NON-SCREENED 1" PVC SCREENED SIDES TO RE SCREENED � RISER SCH. 40 BC -� � ` �'''�_ ( ) ORK ''� MH 6,000 SF BOREHOLE / �% FM ----��1, FM ------- FM RESTORATION �\ MRM PROJECT (6" DIAMETER) CE /� _ \ Z1 .5 FORCE MAIN PLANTING AREA \ \ MANAGEMENT, LLC _- SALEM, MA GRANULAR - .AREA OF FORMER EROSION CONTROLS & LIMIT \ PACKING _ __-- — J SETTLING BUILDINGTES ' OF WORK/ DISTURBANCE ASTM C33 NO.--\ --- — 9 67 TOR151 IF ACKS +4-1 11 DETAILS V SCREW FITTING _ -- — — y7 / \ REMEDIATION DETAILS CAP BIT./ CONC. H ONC. PAT 10x6 x 5 — -� C ---- r \ SQQLe; 1'=40' 1 a D \ \ GROUNDWATER ---- __ POTENTIAL-SLUbG�E �ED \� D — D D p _ \ p fob No, 700 NOTE: -- .__ (2-0 x,30� TE S T �` �o H� -'`I _ D --�— D MONITORING WELLS TO BE MONITORING WELL _ — --- 10 ! 1-70 --� File Namur p/p/S/h_b C 10 INSTALLED UNDER THE N.T.S. REMQ�E AS `REQ D. \ Op .______ / \ SUPERVISION OF THE LICENSED '- \ \ ` `\ DA1% 3/11/13 SITE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. \ \ i i oA O o R�v M ON ( I / MAP 16 LOT 377 MAP 16 LOT 238 GO r / STONE RETAINING 23 HFR N/F N/F WALLS WITH SIGN 23 HBP HARMONY GROVE \ / 3 PO COR 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC LAM \\ :x { LAND COURT PLAN! 33813A \V 35 NBP 35 NFR � • � ORTH RIVER CANAL TIDAL ORCT r 6 CK WITH 6 HE E a: 25 HE 6 HPG AT EACH TRE,�� - - \ 25 HPG RIPRAP AREAS M R ' � .6 4 FA 11 Rem -I VT <1\� 6 VT 1 TO i. i LAWN 3 PO 3 M5v .3 To _ AUTHORITY 6 LOT 378 40 AEv ��_ - - 1 POG t0 AM R.R. TRACKS I ` 3 PO - 5 HE5 TRANSPORTA TION N/F BAY I0 SJ5 8 HES 10 AM i POA i )NY{ GROVE 25 AEv t' 8 HE5 16 CN 151 s AOR -- �f s. 20 NFR I0 AM - - `n v 1 SNOW STORAdm \ o z P 5 F 10 HPG R.R. TRACIKS + 1 BN \ �� 3 MSV � z 1-6 t0 io' WiDE PATH w \ EXIST.30"I Lu HONEY - EXIST. 10" DIA \ \ o i CH U�ETTS / �a*; HFR LOCUST TO REMAIN LINDEN T, trnl 20 NBP EXISTING REMAIN (TYP.2 Q 0 13 HE \ w 35 SP 8 i POA SNOW STORAGE 5 PN-� 11 AM 31 AEv 13 NPG 26 AM OFFICE 25 HPG LOCATIONS) z m STORAGE 551 1 PO4 GT 3 PO BUILDING HGE z HES z o 3 HGE I My 3 AL 6 MSv 1 VI I TO s IAL \ O 3 NPG X i0 RA 3 5f 13 1=C 8 SJS 8 HE 6 NE 3 AL - 56 HFR Q ! SJS ' I 3 PN I 1 5J5 I TO 5 SJS ,, ® / 8;41=G 3 Po ® 3 } 3 Gt ~- �- 6 HPG 6 M5Y } ` I TO 13 5J5 „ W W W 0 { 4 BSG 1 RA �� 3 SJ5 13 G BENCH,TYP. 4 HE \ > 'S 'S o C 1 RA 6 NE _ EXISTING 24 DIA. O z ►- 4 LFC 1 5 RBN 23 HOA 13 EC 1 AL _REINA TREE TO O w N p { 4 M5v 4 MSV f2 LFC 2 RA a LFG 10 LFG PROPOSED BUILDING # -6 HPG 2C � 12 AM 6 M5Y �� � 56 AEv � w l I TO 3 RSN 3 NE5 SNOW I PO 13 CH 21 HE 2 GH r rz .5 TO I•TO i SJS 12 CI46 VT W/ GARAGE UNDER i MV STORAGE 3 RBN IPO 21 NPG 4 AL 6 MSv 15 M5Y r l r Z Z U � Z 0 o + 4'7 UNITS i RA 12 LFG i RA ~-- W W W W w ,� z 1 5J5- . — .3-PN.. 1 POA I POG 6 HE �--� 3 GT 13 EG 10 HES Z } i0 LFG 1 CN II CH ii U U 1 POC l POA I �" 6 HPG 3 PN -- J J Q _[ Z SNOW STORAGE GRG-13.0 8 LFG 1 PoA pROp 4 RBN 3 Fid 40 AEV - — 26 NBP --r-- w w U �, O W W f>7 w W 11' � ,L LIMITS OF--�~� 3 PO , 3 BN 13 NBP I VT 2 IriV FF=23.0 1 RBN OSED BUILD] CLEARING ` 11 CH w U) w RETAINING SNOW STORAGE 4 NES• 1 RBN 6 HGE '6 I-IGE 1 RBN I"RBN i POB _1 `� 1 EL i 1 BN WALL,TiYP. 6 NPG 6 HPG 15 B5G 3 LFG W/ GARAGE ANDER#2 3 RBN 5 RBN ~~ 'c 9 ` ! 26 NFR O O O 5 F- 0 Ow n 0 8 VT } I 5 RSN 4 PP > 3 HESS N 1 SSG 3 HE$ i0 BSG 2 My UNI T'$) 3 CK 1 RB �. w w w 0 0 W 0 w / t5 SP '� HE5 (47- 1 1�i�1 n cH / 50 RR 4 PO i5 RBN n n (A (A (A fA W 1 r 4 1 RBN 6 HGE 1 RBN 3 RBN 12 LPC w w 3 PN " 6 HPG 6 H 8 L1=C p 1 RA 11 CH \ �-- im' WIDE PATH > > > 0 0 > U) Q V) 5 F:SN 35 NFR . LALLN I RBN 1 POG 23 BSG ROPOSED BUIL 3 G7 30 ABP Q Q 3 = { t GT 3 GT ., Q 13 BSG I RBN w/ GqR DING #3 �- ` 36 VT 3 BN • , - 3 HE5 55 HPG/ / 10 LFc (47 AGE UNDER 3 PN LAWN--\, c� cv c� .- .- .. w I' 1 AF .../ 5 PA 3 GT HGE 3 HES UNITS 4 TO I W m i0 BSG 1 RBN co a c� o rn 3 S 1?N SNOW STORAGE' 14 LFC 6 HGE i TO 25 CN ` o N 0 N N o � Q o z I 11 SJ5 3 GT 6NPG 2 MV I RBN 1 My 6 BSG rn 0 0 U) 1 51 6 RBN 3 PA I POB c I RBN I BN 1 3 NE5 o ui 16' LOT 217 ~"�- 1 PP i RBN 13 BSG ° 3 NES 2 CO 24 N w w ,•I a N/F - • ' - i AL 2 RBN LAWN 3 PN 3 PA SARKES t6 5t� 3z RR i 3 PO 2m fPBN 30 SJS 1 POB 1 HBM 5 RBN 8 HE5 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p z i 21 RR 14 VT I GT 3 H=S 00 0 0 00 0 } z o MAP 16 LOT 218 U 5P 13 5J5 3 PO 15 LPG 6 NGE SNOW 1 PO 6 RA 20 VT S MSV 3 BN STORAGE 5 RBN A 3 HES m T o 1 f N/F `�`� ""' 35 RR 183.5P 12 RBN 1 BN 6HPG p S!L VER ``' 1 AF `" .�,, b SP (LAM) GH ui N � x ' FLORES 'j 6— — — — — T 1 9J5 �r LAWN z C7 w o U n. ° - --- - - o r'MAP 16 .' • MAP 16 -- o (SNOW STORAGE c, x - MAP 16 LOT 376: LIMITs of -- - ` -/ ' �-{ F `CLEARiNCa. LOT 224 LOT 225. EPSAF �1NE0 FLORES N/FN/F MAP 16 #28 16 SP 6 VT Sli 5 AF PP \ 4 PA z MAP. 16' I CONLEY I TGUCKER ' i I LOT 227 I. — — — — { 1� { LOT :223 ' I I N/F MAP 16 LOT 230 x —1- a -1 PN op • ' PN g PP !J� 1m PN 4 WE5 I L y #2 AP 16 NSF i I LAWSON N/F x M 'A&N :REAL MAP 16 LOT 222 DEMEULE �— 3 POA a RBN ESTATE x LIMITS of MAP 16 #2 ra......® j LOT 220 N'/F TRUST ' �- �- MAP 16 o MAP 16 LOT 232 I o ( CLEARING LOT 380 MAP 16 / co Q Cn o N/F KOHLOFER 1 I LOT 231 I N/F 1 #10 MAP 16 LOT 234 N/F LOT 235 / � ? m v l BLANDEN : " Q' MAP '16 LOT 229 1 I N/F I' 1 N/F PATTISON `� N N/F I ROSS#20 MYERS . of MAP 16 GiN PATTIF 'U w _L z # i i I_. .. . II MCSNIIG C io o h o { I i :. i I BASH ( #24 LOT 233 #6 roCD #48 a y U o #14 �� V ., #38 #36 #40 #30 ,.....,.,... ' SPERIDAKOS �. n' co '3 2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKE= 0 cv � O 2x2x4' GROSS MEMBER m 0 ' BEA VER S TREE T o Q J m w i is"t 0) W z abw (A N i tL N a 1 0 2-21i2 DRYWALL 5CREW5, °� Z GRAPHIC SCALE TYP, '�^, o N 40 0 20 40 80 ISO " TREE W 2 �, w r 4f-Om REMOVE ALL LABELS, W o 9 .- VII TAGS OR OTHER FOREIGN ALT, T}�EE STAKING PLAN VIV MATERIAL FROM LIMBS L.ANDeGAFE NOTES . IN FEET ) NOT TO SCALE I1 i�ll�� h 40 ft. I• PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLANT L15T5 ARE FOR CONVENIENCE TO THE CONTRACTOR ONLY.THE 1 incFRU CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AS :SHOWNE OR FINCHN ON PLANS. \\� � BACK CANDLE Lu 2. SIZE AND GRADING 5TANDARD5 OF PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO TiHE LATEST EDITION OF \ �� GROWTH 1/3, "U.5.A. STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK," BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF'NURSERYMEN, INC, . 1,1 MAINTAIN FORM(, DO PLANT - LIST, '. REMOVE ALL LA5EL5, Vii II( l / NOT PRUNE LEADER 0 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE FROM INSECTS AND DISEASE_ KEY QT'r:` BOTANICAL.NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TAGS OR OTHER FOREIGN iI lil �� . 111 ' � 4. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTABLE HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES, AEV 198. A5TIL51= JAPONICA 'ELISABETH VAN VEEN' ELISABETH VAN VEEN ASTILBMATERIAL FROM LIMBS CINCH TIE TREE (DE NO. 2 CONT 1l l THIS 15 70 INCLUDE F'ROFER FLANTING MIX, PLANT BED AND TREE PIT PREP'ARATION, PRUNING, AF 42 ABIE5 FRASERi FRASER FIR 6'-'f' WST. 1 �11 1111 ��/Jy� HOSE �'- U STAKING OR GUYING, WRAPPING,SPRAYING,FERTILIZATION, PLANTING AND ADEQUATE MAINTENANCE AL l5 AMELANCNIER CANADENSIS 'LAMARKII' LAMARKI SERVICEBERRY 8'-10' CLUMP (LIMB UP) �1i1�I��`� 1lI i /`' Z UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER AM 19 ARONIA MELANOCARPA 'AUTUMN MAGIC' AUTUi N MAGIC CHOKEBERRY 24"-36" ��ti` {011 1. / 'J BN. 14 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH 12'-14' CLUMP 2"x2"WOOD ��1111r I'/ O 5. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF.ONE YEAR BY TrHE CONTRACTOR AND BSG 95 . • BUXU5 SEMPERVIRENS X 'GREE=N MOUND' GREEN MOUND BOXWOOD 24"-30" PRUNE 1/3 FOLLOWING STAKE AT ANGLE ��I� iI� �// G ~ ' t I �JJIIVI �I DO NOT MULCH A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS THEREAFTER BY THE OWNER FROM DATE OF IN5TALLATiON. DURING THE GH 189 CLETHRA ANIFOLIA HUMMING BIRD' HUMMINGBIRD 6UMMER5WEET 21-3- HGT, ��'�PLANTING TOWARDS PREVAILING {�V� II f l� I r � z ONE YEAR GUARANTEE PERIOD, DEAD PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACEED AT No COST TO THE CK 13 CORNUS KOU5A 'CHINEN515' CHINESE DOGWOOD 2-21/2" CAL. WIND 1 I I�f ! DIRECTLY AGAINST W GNI A A ' Y IAN7' 11� Itl�I TRUNK Q OWNER AT THE END OF THE 'ONE YEAR PERIOD,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OEBTAIN FINAL EC. 52 E N GE RUB. G RUBY GIANT CONEFLOWER NO. 1 CONI ACCEPTANCE FROM THE OWNER GT 24 GL'EDITSIA TRIACANTN05•VAR. iNERMS SKYLINE SKYLINE HOiNEYLOCUST 4" G SLOW RELEASE III f 11t�1I Y /�{1 II i �f 1A�1 S ' , '. f�+ 1II � I�� �. Lw' 'BUTTER 'BUTTERED O CORN DAYLILY ND,2 CONT FERTILIZER PACKET 4" BARK MULCH >NBP 141 ? 6. ALL GRASS, OTHER VEGETATION AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALIL PLANTING AREAS HE 146 -.'N05t,4 ,EL5GANS' " ELE=GANS HOSTA No.2 CONT 6-8" DEPTH EARTH SAUCER O PRIOR TO PLANTING. HE5 .101 HYDRANGEA 1"fACROPHYLLA.''ENDLESS SUMMER'. ENDLESS SUMMER HYDRANGEA 24"-3o" 4" BARK MULCH 3 PACKETS REQUIRED Q Q HFI 310 .•"NE MEROCALLIS. 'FRAGRENT RETURN5' FRAGRENT RETURNS DAYLiLY NO. i CONT FINISH GRADE z } 1. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED WiLL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUC'TiON AND'S ALL BE HGE •101. N05TA''CsRE=AT EXPEGTAT10N5' GREAT EXPECTATIONS HOSTA NO.2 CONT DO NOT MULCH EARTH SAUCER. z ` I THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR i HOA 23 HEMEROCALLIS 'ON•AND ON' ON AND ON DAYLILY NO. 1 CONT DIRECTLY AGAINST z L� � "; TI�TiT-T�11 EXISTING SOIL z Q O j 1 ;-IPG 211 WOSTA 'PIE:DMONT GOLD' " '. PIEDMONT GOLD H05TA No.2 CONT. BRANCHES n- 6. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 15 ADVISED OF THE PRESENCE OF THE UNDEFZGROUND UTILITIES AND LPG t26.. LEUCOtNOE ONTANESANA 'COMPACTA' COMPACT LIEUCOTHOE NO.3 CONT FINISH GRADE n 1 -�-� _•,c. _ REMOVE ALL Q SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF SAME BEFORE GOir(MENG{NcG AND DIGGING MSV 58 MISCANTHUS:SINIEN515'C05MOPOLITAN' SiLVER GRA55 NO.2 GOVT - = I I I = IT - •''�. �+ I I- METAL OR ROPE —j �. z T "� "�' w;� BINDINGS 4 WRAP Y I -- OPERATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR Un'ILITIE5, PAVING, My 9 .MAGNOLIA VIRGINiAN,4 SWEETBAY MAGNOLIA 8-10 HGT 'I�I=III=III=I I I=III=I I ya-I•�--1=XISTING SOIL ALT. TREE STAKING:- - U � WALKS, CURBING, ETC. DAMAGED IN PERFORMANCE OF THI5 JOB AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE PA 19 F RUNU5 ACCOLADE. ACCOLADE CHI=RRY 2"-2�r2" CAL =III=III-III - _ _ i �� _, TIT I I I II i FROM TOP 1/3 [� _ _ _ lli REMOVE ALL METAL OR (2)2i2 _ _ � I I I I OF ROOT BALL W Q jy W W OWNER PSJ 12 PINUS:NIGRA : AUSTRIAN PINE 8'-to' HGT. -'III=1 I i = I I-I I I I - _ (L. > "'3 w PO 34• PICEA OMORiKA SERBIAN SPRUCE 6'-1' HGT -I( I I- ___ I i�I I- ROPE BINDINGS WRAP DRYWALL SCREWS r I I I-I 1 I - - 12" MIN.WITH �-- O � Z_ �J. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3 CLEAN SHREDDED DARK BRG7llR�1 BARK MULCH. POA 8 PiGEA OMORIKA SERBIAN SPRUCE I0'-12' HGT _I II�=I -I III FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT 2"x2'x4' WOOD - I I1�= 1= k l- ` T` BACKFILL MIX1CLIlzE w O POB 3 :PICEA oMORIKA SERBIAN SPRUCE 12'-14' HGT r r BALL CROSS MEMBER U C7 w Q SLOW RELEASE AS SPECIFIED ' 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 4" LOAM FOR ALL AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. POC 5 "' PICEA OMOl?IKA ., SERBIAN SPRUCE 14'-16' NGT } > N FERTILIZER PACKET 2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKE W U Z Q 0- O PLANTING AREA5 SHALL RECEIVE 12" ROLLED THICKNESS OF LOAM. THE LANID5CAPE CONTRACTOR ' PP 39 PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE 6'-1' HGT, „ �, �� 2 PACKETS RE=QUIRED 6" MIN.WITH WITH LONG TAPER MIN, 18 Q Q 0 SHALL COORDINATE SUBGRADE PREPARATION WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRiOR TO RA 24 �RHODODENDRON AGLO AGLO RHODODENDRON 24 -3m G r PLACING LOAM, f RBN 128 Rl-IODODENDRON 'BOULE IDE NEiGE' BOULI5 DE NEiG5 RHODODENDRON 24"-3m" BACKFILL MIXTURE NOTES; z (D �.w W Q RR 144 ROSA vIRGINIANA VIRGINIA ROSE' V-3' AS SPECIFIED INSTALL STAKES AND GUYS TO TREES IF THE FOLLOWING APPLY: Q u W = Q Q � d Q m I 11. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, INCLUDING PLANT LOCATION, SEELECTION, SiZE, 51 13 SYRINGES RETICULATA 'IVORY SiLK' : ;iK TREE LILAC 2"-2�" CAL, CC z I.THE TREE 15 OF SUBSTANTIAL SIZE. J O J c� tq w C w 0 QUANTITY OR CONDITION SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE SJS 116 SPiRAEA JAPONICA SHiBORI SHI130RI SPiRAEA 24"-36" 2.THE PLANTING LOCATION IS EXTREMELY WINDY,A5 ON OPEN UNDEVELOPED SITES, I- ARCHiTECT (AND MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, IF APPLICABLE)PRIOR To INSTALLATION ON SITE. 5P 119 SYRINGA PATULA 'MISS KIM'.'1 MI55 KIM LILAC 3'4' NGT. D EC i DUOUS � EYE:I\GIRE EI V St"t�1.4� 3.THE PLANTING LOCATION IS COMPRISED O>= SAND OR OTHER LOOSE TEXTURED SOILS. TO 31 TI-IUJA.OGGIDI=NTALI5 'SMARAGD'- ' ; EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE 6'-1'HGT, 4. 1F STAKES AND GUYS ARE REQUIRED,REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR TIME. DATE SCALE 12. WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN, PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE FOR PERENNIAL AND AiNNUAL FLOWER BED VT 14-1 VIBURNUM TOMENT05UM 'M,4RiE5i' MARIES VIBURNUM 24"-36" NOT To SCALE I I ' I r 3 AREAS 5HALL CON515T OF FOUR PARTS TOPSOIL, TWO PARTS SPHAGNUM PEAtT MOSS, AND ONE DE:C I DI.lOUS T 'E:. S UNDER 2° CALIPER OR 8111/11 1"= 40' PART HORTICULTURAL PERLITE BY VOLUME. PEAT MOSS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WiTH WELL'-ROTTED p C UNDER 8 IN HEIGHT J I OR DEHYDRATED MANURE OR COMPOST. ROTOTILL BEDS TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES. 1 EYE;I\ E:N TRE:E:J 1'_0" IN HEIGHT 4 UNDER 1 NOT TO SCALE S . i HEET 1 OF 1 11 L _ , 1 REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 6/20/12 REVISE PER PEER REVIEW AND TIE PLA ' OR PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS I DI E LIM, XE.. D, U S I VELOPM A01 MENT AT H I m Aff FGACY61 ArN. K PAVI ANN%& AV �T OF DRAWINGS : REVISED JUNE 2.0 2012 N-- . : PLAN NOTES OWNER & MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC pC-1 : BOUNDARY & ZONING PLAN APPLICANT: 9 ABBOTT STREET BEVERLY, MA 01915 rST °�� s� C-2: EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN s,. HARMONY GROVE CEMETERY ENGINEER: GRIFFIN ENGINEERING GROUP, LLC C-3: OVERALL SITE LAYOUT PLAN P.O. BOX 7061 ygRM 100 CUMMINGS CENTER 's°� ROBERT 9�� ml c„ °"Y GRo,� o -3A-C: SITE LAYOUT PLAN N• N z D R�. GRIFFIN SUITE 224GMq� a m T �o #36686 Q Sr ��• C-4A-C: GRADING DRAINAGE & BEVERLY, MA 01915 - �• RST �o� ' EROSION CONTROL PLAN SURVEYOR: LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES C-5A-C: UTILITIES PLAN 161 HOLTEN STREET SITE DANVERS, MA 01923ens R PNP C-6: DETAILS � TO,y Q , N• R SFR ST s� S�- BUILDING BEAUDS ART, INC. C-7: DETAILSP� 11 ARCHITECT: 15 LONGWOOD DR. ��• F�°�� - �� 0 KENNEBUNK, ME 04043 �� C-8: DETAILS III LANDSCAPE SEBAGO TECHNICS D e°SroN ST C-9: DETAILS IV ARCHITECT: ONE CHABOT STREETO 1 OF 1 LANDSCAPING PLAN q. WESTBROOK, ME 04098 , g o o Q 1 OF 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SITE WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS a Z � T Q LIGHTING: 1919 WINDSOR PLACE A1 . 1 FIRST & UPPER FLOOR PLAN FORT WORTH TX 76110 A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS E LOCUS MAP A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3 a 1 " = 400' a i E u a a` GENERAL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.): UTILITY NOTES (CONT.): 1 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF THE 10. ALL PROPOSED SLOPES (EXCLUDING RIP-RAP SLOPES) STEEPER THAN 5:1 AND ALL SLOPES 14. WHERE WATER MAINS CROSS OVER SEWER LINES WITH LESS THAN 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE, EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON THE RECORDS OF REGARDLESS OF SLOPE WITH AN OVERALL CHANGE IN GRADE GREATER THAN 10 FEET FROM TOP TO AND WHERE WATER MAINS AND SERVICES CROSS BENEATH SEWER LINES, SEWER LINE AND WATER VARIOUS PLANS AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THIS INFORMATION IS BOTTOM SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LINE SHALL BE CAREFULLY ENCASED IN CONCRETE. ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND FROM PIPE NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPOSED SLOPES (SLOUGHING, EROSION, ETC.) THAT SURFACES A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 8" ALL AROUND AND ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND ALONG UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE START OF RESULT DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AS DIRECTED BY THE EACH PIPE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET FROM THE OTHER- PIPE AS MEASURED NORMALLY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES, GOVERNING ARCHITECT/ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. FROMM ALL POINTS ALONG THE PIPES. PERMITTING AUTHORITIES, AND "DIG SAFE" AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN '11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ON SITE AT ALL TIMES ADDITIONAL HAYBALES, EXTRA SILTATION 15. PROPOSED GAS SERVICE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR -SHALL 1 a WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES INTERFERING WITH PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL FENCING, A STOCKPILE OF CRUSHED STONE, EXTRA FILTER BAGS OR ANY OTHER ITEM SPECIFIED CONFIRM WITH THE GAS COMPANY THAT GAS LINES INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE BY THE LOCAL GAS ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH THE WORK. IT HEREIN FOR EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL FOR INSTALLATION AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE THE GAS COMPANY ADVANCE- NOTICE OF WHEN THE GAS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO MITIGATE ANY EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. LINE CAN BE INSTALLED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COORDINATION, EXCAVATION, CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST BACKFILL AND COMPACTION FOR THE GAS LINE. TO THE OWNER. 12. THE AREA OR AREAS OF ENTRANCE OR EXIT TO AND FROM THE SITE SHALL BE CLEARED OF 2. THE CONTRACTOR .SHALL NOTIFY THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING STAFF AT LEAST 48 ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER 16) ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND SCHEDULED WITH THE OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE AREA OR AREAS OF ENTRANCE AND EXIT SHALL BE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SERVICING THE PROJECT SITE. HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT TRACKING; OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT OFF OF THE 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE .RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING ALL HORIZONTAL PROJECT SITE. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED OFF THE PROJECT SITE FOR DUE TO THE SMALL SCALE L THE VERIFIED DRAWINGS, EXACT LOCATION 'OF SERVICE UTILITY STUBS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. FOR BUILDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE BUILDING DRAWINGS. SERVICE -STUBS TO AND VERTICAL CONTROL POINTS AND BENCH MARKS NECESSARY FOR THE WORK AND FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO A POINT 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING WALL UNLESS PROVIDING ANY CONTROL INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO THE BUILDING 13. PRIOR TO INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED. CONTRACTOR. ENGAGE AN INDIVIDUAL WITH PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND EXPERTISE IN EROSION AND SEDIMENT 4. TEST PITS WERE DONE FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STORMWATER INFILTRATION FIELD DESIGN AND CONTROL TO MONITOR SAME. THE EROSION CONTROL MONITOR SHALL PREPARE A MONTHLY REPORT 18) THE PRIMARY ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY WETLAND AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT. TEST PITS SHOW CONDITIONS OBSERVED WHICH SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES. ALL ASPECTS OF THE THESE SERVICES SHALL BE DESIGN/BUILD BY AT THESE SPECIFIC POINTS ONLY. THEY DO NOT NECESSARILY SHOW THE NATURE OF ALL FEDERAL AGENTS UPON REQUEST. THIS REPORT SHALL INDICATE THE STATUS OF THE EROSION THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL, AND UTILITY COMPANY CONTROLS AND ANY MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AND PERFORMED. INSPECTIONS AND REPORTS SHALL STANDARDS AND CODES. THE OWNER HAS VERIFIED THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE ELECTRIC AND MATERIALS TO BE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM TELEPHONE SERVICES. ALL COSTS AND FEES ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING THESE SERVICES 5. GRADES, BOTH EXISTING AND FINISHED, ARE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. THE LLC THAT WILL HOLD (NPDES) PERMIT. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FURNISHING AND INSTALLING ALL STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT, CONDUIT, WIRING, POLES, TRANSFORMERS, PADS, PERMITS, EASEMENTS, ETC. NECESSARY TO BRING THESE THE CONTRACT AND/OR ENGINEER ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR EXISTING GRADES SHOWN ON 14. ANY DEWATERING REQUIRED ON THE SITE SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A TEMPORARY SILT REMOVAL SERVICES TO THE BUILDING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL AREAS WHEREIN GRADES ARE SHOWN TO SATISFY BASIN LOCATED- OUTSIDE OF THE 100' BUFFER ZONE FROM WETLANDS. OF TEH CONTRACTOR UNLESS- SPECIFIC ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE WITH THE OWNER IN WRITING HIMSELF AS TO ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND INCORPORATE ANY DISCREPANCIES DISCOVERED. PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID. THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING ALL CONTROL POINTS AND MARKINGS INSTALLING WIRES AND CONDUIT FROM 10' OUTSIDE THE BUILDING TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL NECESSARY FOR THE WORK. PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PRESERVE MATERIALS OUTSIDE THE 15. REFER TO THE OPERATIONS & MAINTENCE PLAN (0&M) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. LINE OF LIMIT OF WORK IN THE MOST UNDISTURBED CONDITIONS POSSIBLE. ROOM. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: PARKING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: 1. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL- BE EQUIPPED WITH A GAS/OIL HOOD ON THE DISCHARGE PIPE AND 19) LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS AND PHOTOMETRICS ARE IBY- WLS .LIGHT OF FORTH WORTH, TEXAS AND 1. HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHALL HAVE A 4' DEEP SUMP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASSACHUSETTS STORMWATER ARE SHOWN .GRAPHICALLY FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES. CIRCUITRY IS TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY MANAGEMENT POLICY. THE SITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR HIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SITE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF JANUARY 1992, AS AMENDED. FOR INSTALLATION -OF *A :COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL SITE LIGHTING .SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WILL 2. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE RCP, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL STANDARDS AND CODES" INCLUDING WIRING CONDUIT, STRUCTURES, 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING DESIGNATED WITH A "V" SHALL BE SIGNED AS "VAN ACCESSIBLE" PER ADA BASES, POLES, FIXTURES, ETC. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUIT, WIRING, 4.1.2.58. 3. ALL STORM SERVICE CONNECTIONS (ROOF LEADERS) SHALL BE 6" INSIDE DIAMETER SCH40 PVC ETC. UP TO 10' FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. BUILDING CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 3. ALL CURBING SHALL BE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE UNLESS NOTED OR DETAILED OTHERWISE. OF CHDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY ENGINEER. INSTALLING WIRES AND CONDUIT FROM 10' OUTSIDE THE BUILDING TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL ROOM. 4. ALL LIMITS OF PAVING SHALL BE CURBED UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE. 4. A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER SERVICES CROSS DRAIN LINES. - 5. ALL STANDARD PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 9' IN WIDTH BY 19' IN LENGTH, WITH 24' AISLE UNLESS NOTED OR DETAILED OTHERWISE. 5. RIP RAP SPLASH PADS AND FLOW SPREADER BERMS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL OUTFALLS. 6. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL BE PAINTED WITH 2 COATS OF PAINT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 6. REFER TO THE OPERATIONS & MAINTENCE PLAN (0&M) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS BETWEEN COATS OF PAINT UNLESS THE PAINT MANUFACTURER REQUIRES LONGER IN WHICH CASE THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS SHALL GOVERN. UTILITY NOTES: 1. ALL WATER MAINS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET OF COVER AND A 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND MAXIMUM OF SIX FEET OF COVER EXCEPT AS NOTED, DETAILED OTHERWISE, OR REQUIRED BY THE DIMENSIONS OF BUILDING SIDEWALKS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY. A VARIATION IN THESE DEPTHS IS PERMITTED (IF ALLOWED BY DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY) WHERE REQUIRED TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH OTHER UTILITIES. HOWEVER, CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL WATER MIAINS AND APPURTENANCES IN 8. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND MARKING ARE TO CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, INCLUDING GUIDELINES. BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLEARANCES, BEDDING, BACKFILL, INSULATION, ETC. ANY VARIATION FROM THE R PLAN LAYOUT MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. THE LIMIT OF THE WORK LINE FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE LIMIT OF THE 2. GENERALLY, WATER MAIN FITTINGS IDENTIFIED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE SHOWN FOR INSTALLATION WORK NECESSARY FOR GRADING OR UTILITY PURPOSES. NO WORK SHALL OCCUR BEYOND THESE LOCATION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THAT NOT ALL FITTINGS REQUIRED FOR 1TI..E 1 6/20/12 CHANGE TITLE BLOCK LIMITS OR BEYOND THE LIMITS DEFINED BY THE HAYBALE/SILTyFENCE. WORK ARE NOTED, SHOWN, OR INDICATED. No Date Description 2. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE- CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 3. ALL WATER MAIN FITTINGS, TEES, HYDRANTS, ETC. SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH CONCRETE WITH THE MASSACHUSETTS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR URBAN AND THRUST BLOCKS. Revisions SUBURBAN AREAS, DATED MARCH 1997, AS AMENDED, AND ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL REGULATIONS. 4. ALL HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 6" C.L.D.I. RUNOUT AND SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH � 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE APPROPRIATELY SIZED GATE VALVE, BOX, AND TEE FITTING. ALL HYDRANTS SHALL MEET LOCAL COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK OR EARTHWORK OPERATIONS AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, AND REMAIN IN PLACE, UNTIL AILL SITE WORK IS COMPLETE AND LOCAL MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANTS AND THEIR IPIPING SHALL BE MECHANICALLY r � �- GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED. RESTRAINED. j 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY MADE AWARE THAT THE SOIL CHARACTERISTICS, TOPOGRAPHY, AND 5. A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET CLEAR HORIZONTAL SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY ROBERT THE WETLANDS PROXIMITY AT THIS SITE MAKE IT PARTICULARLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO SOIL EROSION AND SEWER MAINS AND WATER MAINS. WHENEVER CONDITIONS PREVENT A LATERAL SEPARATION OF 10 H SENSITIVE TO ITS CONSEQUENCES. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE DEEMED FEET TO A WATER MAIN, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH AND THE GCIVIL RIFFIN y NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER OR THE MUNICIPALITY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ELEVATION THE CROWN OF THE SEWER SHALL BE AT LEAST 18 INCHES BELOW THE INVERT OF THE ° #36686 WATER MAIN. �� s r r�4, 5. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF A BE RESPONSIBLE FORE THE SITING - ��• A SINGLE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 6. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES 2.5 AND SMALLER SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER TUBING AND SHALL BE RELOCATION, AND AUGMENTATION OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING HAYBALES, SILTFENCE, INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED CORPORATION STOP WITH APPROVED SADDLE, CURB STOP, z/a,�,�-z DRAINAGE SWALES, TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATIONS BASINS, CRUSHED STONE, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR AND BOX. SHALL ANTICIPATE AND MODIFY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BASED ON PAST AND CURRENT WEATHER CONDITIONS, SEASON AND EXPECTED FUTURE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AS THE PROJECT 7. ALL WATER MAINS 3" OR LARGER SHALL BE CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, AND PROGRESSES AND SITE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS CHANGE. IN THE EVENT THAT INSUFFICIENCIES IN THE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED FITTINGS AND GATE VALVES. EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES ARE IDENTIFIED BY THE OWNER,, OR AN AGENT FOR THE OWNER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING, SUPPLEMENTING, RELOCATION, OR OTHERWISE 8. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH ,APPROPRIATELY SIZED GATE, BOX AND LEGEND (Typical .All Sheets PROVIDING EROSION CONTROLS AS NECESSARY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. TEE FITTINGS. o s%H STONE BOUND/DRILL HOLE PROP. BUILDING Griffin , 6. STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH STAKED HAYBALES AND/OR SILTATION FENCES TO 9. ALL WATER MAIN APPURTENANCES, MATERIALS, METHODS .OF INSTALLATION AND TESTING O DRILL HOLE PROP. RETAINING WALL PREVENT AND/OR CONTROL SILTATION AND EROSION. THE LOCATION OF THE STOCKPILE AREAS REQUIREMENTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS. Englneenng MAY BE MODIFIED AS APPROVED BY THE ON-SITE EROSION CONTROL MONITOR, BUT SHALL BE O IRON ROD PROP. BIT. CONC. CURB Group, LLC LOCATED OUTSIDE THE 100' WETLAND BUFFER ZONE. TOPS OF STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED IN 10. PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TEST, DISINFECTION AND FLUSHING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH - - PROPERTY LINE - PROP. EDGE OF GRAVEL SUCH A MANNER THAT STORMWATER DOES NOT INFILTRATE THE MATERIALS AND THEREBY SUCCEED ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IN MAKING IT UNSUITABLE FOR FILL USE. ALL COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH UTILITY TESTS, FLUSHING AND INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY THE - - EASEMENT LINE PROP. CONTOUR P.O Box 7061 LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. w PROP. WATER LINE 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G 7. EARTHWORK ACTIVITY ON THE SITE SHALL BE DONE IN A MANOR SUCH THAT RUNOFF IS MEAN HIGH WATER LINE wV Beverly, MA 01915 DIRECTED TO TEMPORARY DRAINAGE SWALES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS. 11. PRIMARY WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTED SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE POINT WHERE 111111111411 EXIST. BUILDING pd PROP. WATER GATE VALVE THE WATER LINE ENTERS THE BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS. EXIST. CURB PROP. HYDRANT Tel. 978-927-5111 8. HAYBALE FILTERS AND/OR FILTER BAGS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL EXISTING & PROPOSED CATCH BASINS SUBJECT TO STORMWATER RUN-OFF FROM PROPOSED EARTHWORK AREAS DURING 12. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPES SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) SDR35 UNLESS NOTED HHHHHIIIHHHHH EXIST. RAILROAD TRACKS s PROP. SEWER GRAVITY LINE Fax: 978-927-5103 CONSTRUCTION, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER/ENGINEER. NO SEDIMENTS SHALL ENTER THE OTHERWISE. EXIST. RETAINING WALL SO PROP. SEWER MANHOLE ON-SITE OR OFF-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AT ANY TIME. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE INSTALLED INSIDE - -14- - - G PROP. GAS LINE CATCH BASINS IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREA WHERE HAYBALES WILL INTERFERE WITH TRAFFIC. 13. A MINIMUM OF 18" CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER MAINS CROSS STORM - EXIST. CONTOURS G„ MRM PROJECT DRAIN LINES. O EXIST. FENCE pd -PROP. GAS GATE VALVE 9. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE ROUTINELY INSPECTED, CLEANED AND REPAIRED OR MANAGEMENT, LLC i REPLACED AS NECESSARY THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTIONS SHALL TAKE W EXIST. WATER LINE D PROP. DRAIN LINE PLACE AT LEAST ONE A WEEK AT THE END OF THE WORKWEEK, PRIOR TO WEEKENDS AND WHEN EXIST. WATER GATE VALVE OO PROP. CATCHBASIN SALEM, M A PRECIPITATION IS FORECASTED. DEFICIENCIES OF ANY KIND SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE EXPECTED PRECIPITATION OR PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE FOR THE WEEKEND. INSPECTIONS SHALL EXIST. HYDRANT ® PROP. DRAIN MAHOLE ALSO OCCUR AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.5" OF RAINFALL AND DEFICIENCIES S EXIST. SEWER GRAVITY LINE RL PROP. ROOF LEADER CORRECTED DURING THAT WORK DAY. a PROP. TRANSFORMER..PAD FM EXIST. SEWER FORCE MAIN © EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE GEXIST. GAS LINE �' "EROSION CONTROL NOTES i D4 EXIST. GAS GATE VALVE 100 BUFFER ZONE D EXIST. DIRAIN LINE ® EXIST. CATCHBASIN o EXIST. DRAIN MAHOLE Sc� 1"=40' EXIST. UTILITY POLE 0-0- EXIST. UTILITY POLE W/ LIGHT Job No, 700 a N - 1 a Fie Nance P/P/s/ -b E LAIC 12/20/11 a a` b i � _ II FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE ZONE A (EL. 10.8) _ _ SB/DH 2 / \ (HLD LINE) 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD PROPERTY IS ` O P / \ 25' WIDE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE / R, / / S.E.S.D. SEWER WETLAND FLOOD O� / / / \ \ EASEMENT HAZARD OVERLAY ` �' / MAP 16 LOT 377 \ G VIDE) / / N/F /FND H \ EXISTING MEAN HIGH MAP 16 LOT 238 DISTRICT OVA /�Y rj 50' i N` / / HARMONY GROVE CORP. & HLDWATER LINE IN THIS N/F \ p, (0.48 ACRES \ PORTION OF THE 50 (GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC \ N P 1�CP`J6L�C i01 CANAL. - LAND COURT PLAN 33813A C NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL _ G 25' WIDE QHS\S-�R\ / / wooD & METAL - - - ENTRANCE \"� �i Q / / BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE CORRIDOR \�-9 S.E.S.D. SEWER gP / / DECK= EL 9.2f \ OVERLAY 60 GROVE EASEMENT ENTRANCE DISTRICT ` ROPERTY ES �O I�CORRIDOR MAP 16 LOT 239 `� ENTIRELY WITHIN THEOVERLAY DISTR CT (3 HARMONY GROVE RD.) EXISTING WETLAND FLOOD S6 35,561 SQ.FT. 1'53'05"E RIDGE \ \ HAZARD OVERLAY 1 / EXIST. ► N25'16'20"E 0.82 ACRES 119.45 ABUTMENTS \ DISTRICT -EMAP 16 LOT 378 RAILROAD 1 30.50' - _\\� \\ 1� N/F CROSSING _ _ L=141.17 - - _ - - -a - ---�- -� �� cr- - o- . - - -10 HARMONY GROVE CORP. �N EASEMENT 1 R= 81' S61*53'05"E t N23'11'05"E �\ AUTHORITY 0 0 (1.02 ACRES) - gA Y TRANSPORTATION TA TION R.R. -TRACKS 1 . 17 vi LIf f) S R.R. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 111111! HHHHHHH $-I TRACK - __ - _ T S61'53'05"E \ MAP 16 LOT 237 n SACHUSE TS L=397.18 � o RET. WAIL \\ (60 GROVE STREET) w�- 468.84 1 MAS _ --_ -t{-f81 4.31 CHORD \ CHO 26,946 SQ.FT. » BUILDING 59 43.10' �� 11.99fBARREL 0.62 ACRES 1 T N24 40 18 E L=29.5' N22'09 28 W _ STORAGE \ 01'13'59"W `15 �% I ENTRANCE CORRIDOR 30.50' R=2844.81 S10'0LAJ �tE ` L.0 _ f _ EXISTING \` \ 90.33' I OVERLAY DISTRICT E- STORAGE \ \ -89 58' \ OC RET WALL » AREA � EXISTING b I BIT. TOW EL. 51 j 68, \\ OFFICE S09'52'11"W I� ® CONC 1 EXISTING MEAN HIGH 9'sf NGF'�Ty RSV \BUILDING , 26.59' FEMA 100-YEAR NIo HAZARDOVERLAYFLOOD ZONE 01 DISTRICT CHIMNEY WETLAND FLOOD WATER LINE IS INSIDE ER "' ZONE A (EL. 10.8) SID HAZARD OVERLAY- FACE OF RETAINING - s5p 53,3 »C'9NAL _ �-� '�ANt rE B -� TIE LINE Y 2 D LO S09'30 54 W a WALL IN THIS PORTION E AL \ CK ' �I� o DISTRICT OF THE CANAL. \ RET WALL TOW 38.56' FINISHz II o o I I96 o BUILDING BLO LO oo S38'33.38„E04 WALLToW 8.20' MAP 16 LOT 236 CONC -. - _- -" LANDING \ L. g.&� (64 GROVE STREET) ) COOPERAGE \ ~`''1- ► _ _ - 234,152 SQ.FT. ROOM 0 » FEMA ZONEN4=2 W I 5.38 ACRES // WETLAND FLOOD \ 286.4' STONE I ZONE A (EL. 10.8) / HAZARD OVERLAY S16'16'13"'W I RET WALL I \ / FEMA 100-YEAR \\ �\ DISTRICT 54.44' I MAP 16 LOT 217 _ / FLOOD ZONE \ #12 SARKES I �_ \ � i / GATE ZONE A (EL 10.8) \ - \ ! R-96.82 No Date Description j PRETREATMENT EI \ L=393.20 LRevisions - - - - - - I # FACILITY °pNC REr. \� BPD DIS_TRIC_T SILVER E - - - MAP 16 LOT 218_ _0 0 _BPD_DIST_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ .- _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - -- - - BPD DISTRICT _ _ _ - - - _ - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ �- (PUBLIC WAY NTF R2 DISTRICT N60'26'11"W N30'35'46"E S30'55'09"W N30'43'13"E R2 DISTRICT RICT �/ I FLORES 10.47' 10.34' 10.02 A SULFONATION 172.12 _, N60'17'03"W BUILDING \ - - - - - - Co - - - - - - _ NE60'1703W , ' » 93.10' _ - c4'--I #4 N 150.50 E qTE �` � MAP 16 LOT M 1 _ 0 ° o N44'11' 0"W\ 39'2756"WI � WAREHOUSE o o_ 224 LOT 225 - MAP 16 --- _Q o N10*0012 W „ : \ S23'34 49 W I q s9 o I I N/F #34 N/F OT X22 #28 "-~--- SHED SHED®� " 18. 2 \ " 29.28 MAP 16 L T 76 Q ►•�o MAP 16 LOT, CONLEY I TUC ER N F S31 1$ 30 W ` \ 10.34 S58'52'3'7"WI o� ROBERT �yG I N F ��^0 223 I / N60'39 54 W - N60'39'54"W 22.60 , -{ FLORES # Q� I N/F I LAws�oN - 113.68 POND X -_Q 28.00 1 11.98' 1 GRIF- r" �- 2 cn I I 0 42 07 W #32 N30-38'46"E! tj MAP 16 A&N REAL 29. 4 20.47 86. 0 j N61'25'51"W WALL I � \ R I LOT 222 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 23 X GARDE a BLEB 9 MAP 16 -34.51 : " ALL - S61'01'28"yy i �Fs #sssas \ 14.97 LOT 220 U KOHLOFER TRUST DEMEULE �X MAP 16 LOT 232 w N71.21 1g' VJ » 2 \\ a I BLANDEN !F 0I MAP 16 }} N o i- NO, _ 6g.9 N31 27 40 � # S64'1 5'50"W I d r, 44 1 I I Q -LOT 23 L o �� MYERS } `� 6.51' MAP 16 \ 11.15' I 1 o i # I I N F � I o N #10 LOT 235 \ • #48 rKj to `� I 1 1 1 I ROSS #20 N �- rn� o MAP 16 MAP 16 N/F \ N51'56' 8"W Z I #24 rn Z '`� MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 LOT 380 PATTISON 107.76 S32'54'25" #40 #38 #36 #30 MAP 16 LOT 2291 233 #6 N/F N/F \ N/F PATTISON 31.90 - - BASH / N #14 CSWIGGIN - - - - - - - - ° - - N601'35'43"W ! SPERIDAKOS - N54'54'20"W \� ■ ■ N60'02'3BEA VER S TREE T N60'40'37"W GRAN. 64.51' 2.81' 20.23'' 40.00' - - - - - - T (PUBLIC WAY N 3o' WIDE) FNDENTRANCE CORRIDOR `� Engineering OVERLAY DISTRICT \ - - - - - - - - - (SEE ZONING SEC. 8.2.2) Group, LLC \ P.O Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 2240 Beverly, MA 01915 Tel. 978-927-5111 Fax., 978-927-5103 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 0 SALEM, MA 2 NOTES: „ 1) THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING EXISTING ZONING INFORMATION. 2) BOUNDARY SURVEY BY LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC., DANVERS, MA. 3) ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ON THE 1929 N.G.V.D. DATUM. BOUNDARY & 4) SUBSURFACE UTILITIES EXIST ON-SITE AND ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 5) PROPERTY LINES FOR 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD ARE APPROXIMATE. ZONING . .PLAN E 6) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. REFERENCES: 1) DEED BOOK 25700 PAGE 109 sG41_ 1"=40' a 2) DEED BOOK 7654 PAGE 26 GRAPHIC SCALE N 3) PLAN BOOK 152 PLAN 98 ,1° ' 4) LAND COURT PLAN #112418 o zo ,0 60 1fi0 fob Ny: 700 - 5) PLAN #8828 (CITY) C- 1 Fie Names.P/P/s/h-b 6) PLAN IN DEED BK. 5452 PG. 111 ( IN FEET 7) PLAN IN DEED BK. 4983 PG. 400 1 inch = 40 fiw Qd% 12/20/11 FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE ` ZONE A (EL. 10.8) - - i EXIST. XIST. CB (ECB) �40� —,/— 't, CURB CUT RIM=8.10 i R I(IN)=6.80 0 \ + I . 1(OU )-5.85 3 HARMONY GROVE / 0 ROAD PROPERTY IS 0 PO / /-� �� ---� - -'� 25' WIDE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE / R / �� �- \ q \ \ S.E.S.D. SEWER WETLAND FLOOD 0� / / \ \ \ EASEMENT / MAP 16 LOT 377 HAZARD OVERLAY FZ E� - ,. �-�' \ 12" vc \ ' DISTRICT `� G 50' `inD ��� -� r o 1/ 12 VC N/F \ OUTFALL \ � /, OUTFALL HARMONY GROVE CORFU. f=5.3f MAP 1N LFOT 238000 B K 7 1=4.3t (0.48 ACRES \ t # 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST LLC \ \ NCPv81 8,g� 'E-- s� / \ \ LAND COURT PLAN 33813A f A# TOP OF ;—�✓ /B� 6 ;., NORTH RIVER CANAL — TIDAL rAG COASTAL / / ANK#5 .3 - WOOD & METAL 25 WIDE i •� •9 , BANK ��'' _--­-BANK#4 t.4 BRIDGE W/ 8' PIPE S.E.S.D. SEWER / � -8� -� � .B DECK= EL. 9.2t \ V EASEMENT / =- = -_ 60 GROVE- STREET �. �i / .1/ BANK --- BANK#8 S—�--� — —— "► BAN 3� N # BANK#9 i� / BANK#10 BANK#11`��. BANK#14 PROPERTY IS O i- MAP 16 LOT 239 -- X# •► WETLAND FLOOD 9 �` BANK#2 ��a- -- -_-_ °�- ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BA KN #1 � ii� I (3 HARMONY GROG RD.) BAN s�uv BANK#1 EXISTING \ ...,, I\ 35,561 SQ-FT. -�-^ s- BRIDGE loot HAZARD OVERLAY F�J EXIST. // �� \ 0.82�L`RES MH , ABUTMENTS 8U DISTRICT MAP 16 LOT 378 /�i RAILROAD \ \ —..ZONE S s N/F \ '��� CROSSING // FM ti FM f5" ORCE MAIN - - - - -a - --�- -Q - �� a- - o - - - - - - _ HARMONY GROVE CORP. K#6 EASEMENT (1.02 Act — .� _. 5 _ --- — -&A-Y- � �, TRANSPORTA TION R..R. TRACKS AUTHORITY s - - �/ -- B R TRACKS - - - - - B� S R• --, ---- LL -- -_ TOP OF IT. ON �L R P LO 237 - t�__ _ �_2 SSACH U SETT _ �,_--� \' //�+- a- T. \ �,`\ _ COASTAL _ ,o— — (so Ro s T o -- - T. MA - -- ---__ - \ 1 BANK BANK#1 a _- - - __ --� � ; BUILDING 59 BARREL 0.62 ACRES ..�R •__ - ' ' - -- --- -\ \ A STORAGE W - _--,6- - --- --� \ \ w \ N - r EXISTING STpy4' �yq W sqP / -14- - �f STORAGE , TER ` 1 AA ' 2� \ OCK RET W AREA EXISTING BIT. \\ o -10_. - ALL T - OFFICE 1'QO-YEAR z0�y� \ \ \ \ter - �4� CONC o EL' 9 6 NIO/��'H BUILDING PAVEMENT O BIT. CONC. �\ FLOOD ZONE ,BOO' gU rR�\ \\ \ \ CHI EY Pt `Zli o r = R/VE,Q C Fx►s / \ \ WETLAN9 FLOOD �I s r, s A (E�40.8) - -- - /""' \ \� ��\ , W HAZARD OVERLAY 1 -to--� EXISTING '9 - rj� GRAN�rE BLQo 0\ ' DISTRICT OVERHEAD �x 'qL K RET, wA o .► o mW STRUCTURE cv LL } Q FINISHING Ow ` EL. D EXISTING CRANITE B4OC 9.6--L- BUILDING _ r T OVERHEAD K RET Al ,y� --_- _ � _ - —2 _ �� ----_ C STRUCTURE TOW ° MAP 16 LOT 236 , / b ONC.L`�N 0 - EL = ;. � BR K BIT. CON . ANp� 9.6 (64 GROVE STREE7f) �pAWEM�'-(NPICAL) ~`0----,D G > COOPERAGE A A — `� / 234,152 SQ.FT. \ ,� ii •, ' (;� ROOM 1 5.38 ACRES ., FEM 100-YEAR�-`..� �j 7�i,(J / �s FLOOD ZO ii D1�1G 26 \ \_---- `+ •.,� / ICON AR TLA FL D �. 3s, 4� -. \l` —— — —_ _ ZONE EL. 10. BIT. CONC. / S�O \ `—1 ` `•'�• \ `'` \ ,` \'8�—— ———1s— \� ( \ _++',\"`C� PAVEMENT t '� rn 3 J� PAS} ' ?` AZA 0 RLA W NE RET \\ �. \ --- - _ - -'_'~ \. �'� 1 DIS ICT " WALL �2 \ - _ u FEMA 100-YEAR 1 MAP 16 LOT 217 , � � ., `�` �.� � Q0.--.-._:..:._..._....,._ _" --18- -._.. ._.,- _.� .�`,_ � �\ �\ /1a��.. � `"„J � FLOOD ZONE T. � �.� � N/F , a \ - _-,20-----_-„ `\"T s �`/ , 1 # / P '� S . EXIST. �, N 1 6/20/12 ADD AUL AREAS, UPDATE SARKES _L -� ` ' x-22- - -- ---- -- -- -------�,�� 'i BUFPCR ! ZONE A (EL 10.8) �-� ESM UTILITES & NOTE 6. #12m \ \ - - -22- ---- �.-- _ -���\ �-'- 14---1s—-'`� w -.� ZONE CONC. �n, � No Date Description - - - - — - _ _ _ S ,- \ XIST, 8" wA fR #6 a ` x--24- - - - - --- --- -- -24 ,�''�-- \\\ \ P RE TR E ATM EN T EI _ ---_s w 1 w------WEST. ,0' --- --- - ._ - 26-- --- -��'i�_�\\\\ \\ FACILITY 14� R�~-s'•` W S�,\S � SMH2 � i \ Revisions SIL VER MAP 16 LOT 218 i 3 32�` '\- -28-_26-_--------- 28 -- -- -l r- \\\\\ f \ s 8, - S q ` N/F �' /'� ��\��---- ---30- _ ---- - --30-_32-_ _�,�j--� � ��_i_�2 ^ y (PUBLIC WAY FLORES — — — — —34——32 - -----— ----- 3s --34 _ - - _ r�\\\�� 824�6�____ _ CK T WA /% 2T= NATION y i _'Z7 --_�-- -_38- _28 fry er �` BUILDING G r s MAP 16 LOT MA 1 ° �q� �- -�- -38= 3 _ _ '- - _�-�'�i-"�� -3�='3 - i/ w`- �.� o 36 224 LOT 225 MAP 16 r�nr7�r�m -_ " - - -- - -36z-�_--�� �+JC_P-� ��\-. \ WAREHOUSE cROBERT i # / #28 - _-- - - 26� �-----22 Z•..._ H. N/F 34 N F OT 227 ° SHED SHED® �\ ' o 16 LOT 76 MAP 16 LOT I CONLEY I TUC ER N F `� �\\ � �? 4- MAP G GRIFFIN N/F 2 I 223 I I I I 32 LAWSON i - - - _ FISH - \ `.�2� \ ��. / CIVIL -{ FLORES # N/F I I # I POND x —_�--___ 0 1, � 2�\�-- Li/ N� ,G & � # 6686VV \4 !r MAP 16 A&N REAL s �� 30+--.•. --�.� � -1 MAP 16 LOT 222 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 23 -0� `�s� - - I ALL L� \ '' N/F TRUST N/F ' G�+RDE �Jg� BIT. C �' A� 4�� LOT 220 `' Y KOHLOFER DEMEULE x N/F p MAP 16 LOT 232 �`' #2 P VEMENT I BLANDEN I I I Q I IMA 1 1 c N/F 10 1 ENT. CONIC. PARIONG 1 CONC. MAP 16 I #44 , MYERS N/F10 LOT 235 / I #48 Q I I I I I I I ROSS #20 \ -"'� o) # MAP 16 MAP 16 N/F / EXIST. SEWER SCHEDULE I #40 #38 #36 BIT. I ) #24 : �q , MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 LOT 380 PATTISON RI MH1 __ JJ CONC. #30 MAP 1 N�OT 229 V t #14 233 #8 CSI/F PAN SON RIM=10.26 INV-3.08 BASH i ' ';PER ESMH2 ° RIM-11.28 8 w� GRA � BEA VER S - - - - INV-5.13Griffin 2--D�S 12 SEWF7R S TREE - - - - (PUBLIC WAY N 30' KINE) Engineering Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 Tel: 978-927-5111 Fax: 978-927-5103 MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC SALEM, MA o In a NOTES: 1) THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2) EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY BY LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC., EXISTING i DANVERS, MA. 3) ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ON THE 1929 N.G.V.D. CONDITIONS .PLAN 4) UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE THE RESULT OF RECORDS OF VARIOUS PLANS AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE ABSENSE OF ,� SUBSURFACE UTILITIES IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. CONTRACTOR TO - 1. VERIFY EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO GRAPHIC SCALE S --'�' CONTACT "DIG SAFE" AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK. L 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND: 40 0 20 40 eo 160 o�1Qb No.: goo 6) PER SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION O.R.A.D. (FILE #64-516) DECISION 73 DATED 7-19-2011 THE 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN C- 2 Fie N RIVERFRONT AREA. AS OF 6-20-12 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OF SAID DECISION ��5�_b EIN FEET ARE CONTINUING AT MA DEP. 1 inch = 40 ft D&k 12/20/11 0 ' HISTORIC HIGH WATER LINE NEW GRANITE CURB SB/DH INLAID CONCRETE EXIST. AND CONCRETE �: / CROSSWALK AND CURB CUT SIDEWALK AT EXIST. / i �- - ' (HLD LINE) ADA RAMPS ATCURB CUT — ' 1 MAIN ENTRACE \ \ 25' WIDE I - _ S.E.S.D. SEWER ' rRO� � MAP 16 LOT 377 \ EASEMENT 1 HISTORIC HIGH / %'� V�DE� STOP SIGN j / N/F FNDSB/DSB & HLD \ \ ` I MAP 16 LOT 238 Q O .( 50 �QQ .• BAR AND STOP j WATER LINE � � N � � / / I HARMONY GROVE CORP. 1 N/F \ vAp1 `� 'C WP S (0.48 ACRES \ I 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC 001* - ' I LAND COURT PLAN 33813A NORM H RIVER CANAL — TIDAL \ G 25 WIDE 1 woo D & ME L ' 0 / / BR G� W/ 8" PIP - S.E.S.D. SEWER ��Q�i � CK= 9.2 EASEMENT% / ROPOC� �� • i \ � /O��\ RIDGE U m TOR HI m Q HISTORIC HIGH L I EXISTING \ i U WATER LINE W AT LIN BRIDGE I- W J / E T Q Q W ABUTMENTS Q=1�W ��� EMAP 16 LOT 378 RAI OA 1 - - _�- \ (n 1 � �Q7 N/F — . , _ — C OSSI G — — — _ . _ _ — — — I , — _ — — — — — — — — — — — _ INLAID CONCRETE PROPOSED - - - . — — — — — — — — — — . — . - - - - - . — — HARMONY GROVE CORP. ASE NT —\— -� T EXISTING LOADING CROSSWALKS & _Ip STOP SIGN BA v \ I ADA RAMP AT p p (1.02 ACRES) AND RD STOP 1 TRANSPORTATION R.R. TRACKS AUTHORITY OCK TO REMAIN ENTRANCE I� III!itHiiiiiiiHHHHPROPOSED —� R.R. TRACKS DU STER 2 ROP. IKE GRANITE it CH U SETTS _ STOP SIGN & BIT. ON . PA AR TEN T P RKI �► RAC 59 •-► \ CURBING I MASSA — — — — — STOP BAR I I - 24.0' (TO EM I f" __ o�•• 1 E STI AS OMM CI B TR H I _ fi- c� \ 9 TO GE SP CE) ST AGE EA I "♦ _ -�► \ OCK RET WALL 1 EA E TIN THIN NCED — E LOSU I HANDICAP I ` TOW _ i FFI 4 ` REPLACE too NIo 1 (�)s ® \ — _ _ IT. ON PA EL. 9.6 NORTy RSV BUI TNG 7 ALONG SIDEWALKS 1111 1111 ER � n GROVE ST. tni� I 1 PROPOSED BUILDING #1 ® 1. ^ '�� - ]-jp RAN/TE BL CONCRETE pl \ AN FRONTAGE W/ iI� _ I W/ GARAGE UNDER �L CK WAL — A = I FENCE ENCLOSED 1 L I— = TRASH & RECYCLING (47-UNITS) �. P TOW �I N 5 _ �► I BIN STORAGE AREA PROPOSED ROPOSED BUI 4 0' _ E B PROPOSED EL, — GnAIVIT PEDESTRIAN 9.6� ..� _ 1 (TYP EACH BUILDING) BIKE RACK CONCRETE y. W/ GAR LDING #2 'I- L 1CIt BRIDGE $ I 4 I (TYP OF 2 SIDEWALK Imo)A� _ (47 UNI UNDER I T. NC. p WALL T pW 1 PER BUILDING) TS) 1A T EL. g 6 f .T PROPOSED PROPOSE PAINIED BIKE RACK BIKE RACK CROSSWALK - _ (TYP OF 2 HISTORIC HIGH (TYP OF 2 22. 1 6/2012 ADD MATCH LINES. REVISE #60 U.N.O.) I ` "�. =s • PER BUILDING) WATER LINE - - �t" PER BUILDING) GROVE ST. LAYOUT. UPGRADE F4 s ' I =+ PROPOSED ROP - SIDEWALKS & CROSSWALKS. STO JV V s 1 W OSED BUILD I ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. N N G G SHIFT.GROVE ST. ENTRANCE. E _ - CONCRETE — TE I RET. W I - RAGE U #3 ®® G MAP 16 LOT 217 ALL N 1 pt =z- x - I SIDEWALK (47_ UNDER WIDEN VEHICLE BRIDGE. ' UNITS HISTORIC HIG ADD BIKE RACKS. SARKES 1 -�► _ V w WATER LINE r-' No Date Description - - - -- - #5 _ -. - - _ Revisions I MAP 16 LOT 218 PD IST CT I _ _ — — _ _ _ 10 — _ _ _ - -1— V _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r,4 — BPD DIST_ _ _ — _ _�,.,_ SILVER - - - - T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N F — R DI RIC f- '�' ���`•=�` `- r _ R2 DISTRICT � N ct j 16.2 0 PUBLIC WAY / _ ' �► 2 MA 16 LOT �► 47.6' .INLAID CONCRETE is � 4 M 1 — — CROSSWALKS & ADA RAMPS o� # 1224 LOT 225 MAP 16 ED � 30 AT MAIN ENTRANCES .� N/F #34 N/F OT 227 28 SHE STOP SIGN I I o MAP 16 LOT 76 '� I MAP 16 LOT I C�NLEY I TUCKER• N/F # I AND STOP N/F 2 1 223 I I I I 32 LAWSON I BAR s° RrNERr �y ---� FLORES # N/F # t,i MAP 16 A&N REAL I I I I I ALL I q ;.rsihelN y MAP 16 LOT 222 2 TRUSTT MAP 16 LOT 23 I ALL LOT 220 U KOHLOFER DEMEULE MAP 16 LOT 2321 #2 I I BLANDEN O Q i I MAP 16 N/F MAP 6 I I #44 I I I I I IL N�F3 MYERS 1 , #110 LOT 235 I . ,�• �2.- MAP 16 #48 Q I I I I 24 ROSS #20 1 LOT16 234OT 380 N/F / I BIT. I MAP 16 LOT 2291 # P IN MAP 16 LOT #6 N F PAT11SON #40 #38 #36 CONC. #3Q N/F 11 (8 SP ES) 233 N/F pATT/1SON —1 -• - BASH # `� CSWIGGIN SPERIDAKOS GRANITE CURB 1 BEA VER S TR GRAN. - 1 TREE 1 POST Griffin r-RANITE CURB I FND En ineenn - - - - I (PUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE) g g Group, LLC 1 P.O Box 7061 1 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 NOTES: 1 1) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. i ! Tel: 978-927-5111 ZONING CHART Fax: 978-927-5103 REQUIRED = NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACE PER PUD PROVIDED (151,202 SF) MRM PROJECT MIN. LOT AREAS 60,000 SF 296,659 SF MANAGEMENT, LLC MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100' 1 161.37' MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 ' SALEM, MA MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5% o MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 49.0% MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1 ' MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6' MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0' OVERALL MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15' MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 SITE LAYOUT MIN. PARKING 1 .5 SP UNIT)__ 212 2154 PLAN E FOOTNOTES: 1) REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. o 2) LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD GRAPHIC SCALE SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. $ 1-=4p' 3 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. 40 0 20 40 80 160 0 SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. Job No, 700 v 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITEC- 3 (1 .5 SP/UNIT). 22 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE ( ai F'EE'T ) Fie Names P/P/s/h—b v BUILDING. 1 inch = 40 fi~ D� 12/20/11 Q a i \HISTORIC HIGH CURBING NOTES: M Q 1) CURBING IN PUBLIC WAY TO BE GRANITE. 2) CURBING ON SITE TO BE PORTLAND -117 WATER LINE \ CEMENT CONCRETE. c) i— W W Q IQw _ = PROPOSED 2 U) I E W — — — INLAID CONCRETE --A — — — _ _.. _ - — - — - — ' — CROSSWALKS & — ' — ' — EXISTING LOADING i AU TTY DOCK TO REMAIN ADA RAMP AT R . R . TRACKS ENTRANCE PROPO-SED ROP. I K E �••� DU STER 2 d- GRANITE AR RAC 5g CURBING TEN T P RKI � o ( TO EM 03 � ISTI AS OMM CIA n P `�� 9. 6 g TOR GE S C E) o EA E TIN 0FF1 4 REPLACE Z g. 6NOR BUI ING SIDEWALKS v ALONG —� 7 O R/ GROVE ST. �R CA �/ FRONTAGE W/ ,� LIDA GRq BL o , �� TE CONCRETE L BLOCK LL T GRPROPOSED `' EL• 9 6 + 4 . O AN/ TE (� PEDESTRIAN 1 �C{C )� WALL BRIDGE T �G T. N TO i — _ f PAT _ EL. _- 9 6� e� PROPOSED , ._._- BIKE RACK ` CH e�K (TYP OF 2 22. y WJE _ PER BUILDING) PROPOSED R 0� No Date Description OSE , W 13U/LD/NG , _ � — � Revisions CONCRETE SIDEWALK GAR/ GE VND #3 �® I (47— � ER . (TYP) NITS) HISTORIC HIGH WATER LINE �a vow O� ROBERT S G rn jGR FFIN CIVIL o #36686 V � . BPD DISTR R2 DISTRICT N 1— — � = T3 0 ...,� 47. 6 _ .� Griffin ` f INLAID CONCRETE m Engineering CROSSWALKS & ADA RAMPS b -=~ ' Group, LLC I AT MAIN ENTRANCES I 30. P.O Box 7061 STOP SIGN I 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G AND STOP I Beverly, MA 01915 BAR I Tel: 978-927-5111 ALL Fax: 978-927-5103 f ALL I MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 16 LOT 232 #2 SALEM, MA N F I FB IT CONC PARKI i / MAP 16 MYERS 10 LOT 235 / # MAP 16 _ MAP 16 N/F / MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 LOT 380 P �INPATTISONF SITE LAYOUT i I 233 #6 N/N/F PLAN 1 8 SP ES CSWIGGIN PATTISON SPERIDAKOS GRAPHIC SCALE Sc 1'=20' _ VER 0 ,a ,0 13EAJ� No.: 700 C- 3A _ r� 3 0� WIDE IN H'EEr ) File Names P/PIs/h—b E _ I I C VI/A I inch = 20 ft. .o (pUBL udE 6/20/12 i L 6 LOT 377 MAP 1 N SB /DH � 1 i I / /F FND 8c HLD HARMONY GROVE CORP. (0. 48 ACRES \ -- NOR �- H RIVER CANALTIDAL \ iI � WOOD & MET L I BRI G W 8" PIP CK= 9.2 M I UI m H TOR HI Q AT LIN EXISTING U I W BRIDGE 0 W 1 U W W W ABUTMENTS � W I ~ W Q Q _ < _ Q = STOP SIGN I I AND STOP BAY TRANSPORTATION BAR . DU STER 2 AR �\ GR BIT. ON PAT --�— L SCK ALL TO _ N - GRq NI9` 6 TE BLOCK cK RET Wq ANDICAP I TO AMPS ® 0 �L W/ _ " TYP) ® C- P/� - I � No Date Description PROPOSED BUILDING #1 �� — Revisions W/ GARAGE UNDER FENCE ENCLOSED (47— UNITS) TRASH & RECYCLING PROPS BIN _ STORAGE AREA PROPOSED E� BUIL I TYP EACH BUILDING CONCRETE � �� G �lNG � - �' F ( ) BIKE RACK SIDEWALK AR's GE #2 w I TYP OF 2 4 _ UNDER I _ S ( (TYP) C U o� ROBERT y < Z H' rn PER BUILDING :: N! TS I o GRIFFIN t CIVIL PROPOSEDaar o #36686 � ® ® BIKE RACK � � - ° _ - TYP of 2 HISTORIC HIGH " PER BUILDING) WATER LINE k (t--v t��, 46 91 in Engineering Group, LLC V - P.0 Box 7061 =Nit* ` .:. - 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 Tel., 978-927-5111 _ & Fax. 978-927-5103 b V 10 V I — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - MRM PROJECT —' MANAGEMENT, LLC M 16 . 2 SALEM, MA I 2 o a - MAI 16 LOT MAP 16 224 LOT 225 1 MAP 16 SITE LAYOUT N /F #3 4 N /F OT 227 #28 ED SHE PLAN E T C NLEY TUCNKER F / I LAWSON 32 GRAPHIC SCALE S x,_20' I I � I 20 0 ,a zo 40 so 81 MAP 16 LOT 230 700 C- 3B ( IN FEET ) Fie Norne: P/P/sA-b Am N //F 1 inch = 20 ft. 0 D E M E U L E I Q&k 6/20/12 NEW GRANITE CURB INLAID CONCRETE EXIST. AND CONCRETE CROSSWALK AND CURB CUT SIDEWALK AT EXIST. ADA RAMPS AT CURB CUT MAIN ENTRACE HISTORIC HIGH GSII STOP SIGN i 0 OP WATER LINE 5 AND ST/ i BAS10000 \cVA , NORTH R1 \S� FZ\ 25' WIDE �� i Q\S / WOOD & MET L S. E. S. D. SEWER BR GW//8 PIP CK= 9.2 EASEMENT R / VE CLE .01 _ — RIDGE C) m i E ST. w w Q Q �-- MAP 16 LOT 378 RAI OA — m N/F — C OSSI HARMONY GROVE CORP. ASE NT _ STOP SIGN (1 . 02 ACRES) / AND STOP BAR cn �. 4. � � 11111 CRACK S � R .R . STTS SACH — — STOP SIGN & MA — — — .................................. STOP BAR TRI — 24. 0 40MDate Description ' _ � I 40" Revisions ST RAGE REA —v = ... .. ITHIN NCED = E LOSU HANDICAP `s�� ROBERT 9y 16 RAMPS 0 N (TYP) GR�.IFFIN y 1111111VIL #36686 9Q (� Cf) TYP. MAP 16 LOT 216 —I ,_ �• -�Z N /F — _ FENCE E RAYMOND TRASH 8 —I N 5 = ' BIN STOF 8 � � _ (TYP EA( Griffin Engineering 1 q- Group, LLC RP.O Box 7061 PAINTED _ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G CROSSWALK Beverly, MA 01915 P U.N.0.) ~- Tel. 978-927-5111 Fax. 978-927-5103 TONE .: RET. MRM PROJECT MAP 16 LOT 217 �LL MANAGEMENT, LLC N/F SALEM, MA SARKES a X12 a a c 6 i SITE LAYOUT PLAN SIL VER L — — _ MAP 16 LOT 218 _ P D IST CT ­NTF R D I RIC GRAPHIC SCALE (PUBLIC WAY FLORES Sc--QL% 1•=20' 3 ' 20 0 10 20 40 80 t Q — -- _ . Job No, 700 c ( W F'EE'T ) He Nab PSP/s/h-b C- 3C MAI 1 .6 LOT 1 inch = 20 ft- E c #4 Q9 t 6/20/12 SOIL TEST PIT DATA (10/17/11) -SEE SHEET C-413- TP-1 (EL. 15.9) DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 0-80 FILL SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH 80-120 Cl S 1OYR 5/4 SINGLE-GRAIN, LOOSE, VARIES ACROSS PIT U w I U w .-,-- NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES ROOTS TO 108" �•- W �._. w .,,,,` 0 0B/ l� � ESH WTx <5.9 (>120") ' V c �E ZQ TP-2 EL. 17.6) S DEPTH HORIZONTEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER - O__ O _ - ---r0 0-54 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH �"■`. 54-64 A FLS 10YR 3/2 GRANULAR AUTHORITY -�•� O 64-74 B LS 7.5YR 6/6 FRIABLE, BLENDS WITH A LAYER R . R . TRACKS TEMPORARY � 74-120 Cl S 10YR 4/4 MED. SAND, VARIES ACROSS PIT NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES SILT SACKS ESHWT: <7.6 (>120") I 1114 (TYP OF 4 CB) _ TP-3 (EL. 17.3) DMH 11 DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 0-24 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH _ _ D _---- D D D --O CB17 24-36 A/B FLS 10YR 3/2 GRANULAR WQS5 D D 36-120 Cl S 10YR 4/4 MED. SAND, CB18 D _ =D.---Jt 6 NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES 9 5 ® D Dx0� 7 -Q ESHWT: <7.3 (>120-) I EROSION C- NOTE: SOIL TESTS PERFORMED BY: J. BLANCHETTE, P.E. ON 10/17/11 CONTROLS EXISTING I S Tl N G S 0 SOIL TEST PIT DATA (4/11/12) gx TP-2A EL. 18.0) S DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 9. 6+ STORAGE 'Z 0-78 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH O 78-120 Cl S 10YR 4/4 SINGLE-GRAIN, LOOSE, VARIES ACROSS PIT AREA PROPOSED -� NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES I OUTFALL 4 EXISTING � ESHWT: <8.0 (>120") ou F LL # OFFICE x7 i ® � INV.=2.3 c n TP-3A (EL. 17.5) DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER 9. 6 + n/0 BUILDING 9Xo O �. _ R T 0 60 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH ' I / 60-72 A B LS 7.5YR 6 6 FRIABLE BLENDS WITH A LAYER vv �� V CB16 � � / / _ Q ® /4 72-120 Cl S 1OYR 4/4 MED. SAND, POCKETS OF COARSE SAND ® �jq n/ ,f� g NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES ® � �' \ 6 6 ESHWT: <7.5 (>120") �- g� �\ xoDA BL O L Q CI� -,V' PERC. TEST #1 ® TP-2A PERC. RATES: 1. _ " EROSIONS ® ® � Q L Q 7 MPI, DEPTH OF PERC 90 � in/ /-- 10 CONTROLS ® ® m 0 Y f PERC. TEST #2 ® TP-3A �"-� -� � v GI� �EL. 9. 6+ __- PERC. RATES: 3.3 MPI, DEPTH OF PERC = 96" ® ANNE PROPO' 9x�� m BLQCK OUTFALL #1 „C NOTE: SOIL TESTS PERFORMED BY: J. BLAICHETTE, P.E. ON 4/11/12 T INV.=2.0 1, BIT• CO �� ALL �G �.�- -- PRECAST STRUCTURE TW=22.0 _ -��-� CB21 _��_NC. P,q _� 0w � - CT RE SCHEDULE INV. 12.0 _RLQ �D TH EL. 19. 6 � UPGRADE EXISTING CB5 DMH4 DMH11 _ o CATCHBASIN WITH RIM=19.00 RIM=19.20 RIM=9.30 TW=21 .0 _ RLQ_ 1 ` ' ` INV.=16.00 I(in)_12.25 (18") I(in)=5.60 (12") / RLQ DMH7 ,�\ NEW' PRECAST BASIN cBs l(in)=15.88 (12") I(in)=5.60 (12") HL� t WITH 4 SUMP & I(out)=12.15 (18") I(out)=5.50 (12") RL_ � RIM=15.25 ` ��O_ �� 9 ` �\ HOODED OUTLET. INV.=12.25 DMH5 5' r�1H YD2 s" / �� �-. 22 � RIM=15.40 RI 2M 0.75 o PROP. 6 0 PRQpO �� \ S CB7 I(in)=9.43 (18") INV.=11.50 No Date Description SED ~ D WQS2 - RIM 14.00 „ ROOF LEADER P w BAIL pIN PROP. 6 0 z INV.=11.0o I(in)=12.20 (12 YD) MIN. 1 .5% SLOPE GAR 3 ROOF LEADER ` Q I(in)=12.20 (12") YD4 12" Revisions AVE U ' CB16.17&18 I(in)=12.20 (6") RIM_16.00 TO DMHS (4N� MIN. 1 .5% SLOPE RIM=9.00 l(out)=9.33 18INV.-12.70 YD CLEANOUT UN/ T TO DMH7 �� INV.=6.00WQS2 G �� Cn ` DMH6 WQ- / TYPICAL RG, TRDl N _ STC 900 r R � OQ ,guF (TYPICAL) . 0 \ RIM 19.00 RIM_14.40 �� FF \ l(in)=8.95 (18") RIM=10.75 N X R� =2 PROP. 6 0 \ INV.=6.00l(in)=10.60 " I(in)=7.50 (18") o a. ' 0 7 \ TEMPORARY (12 ) I(in)=9.00 (6") s ROBERT L� L ROOF LEADER CONSTRUCTION \ CB22 l(out)=8.85 (18") I(out)=7.25 (18") GRIH. FFIN MIN. 1 .5% SLOPE �� \� RIM=9.35 DMH7 +'° #3x IL HP I - 5� n1 : -. v ® TO DMH5 ENTRANCE INV.=5.50 WQS5 �� 20 � � (DROP MANHOLE) STC 900 x82 14 R�� TRD1 RIM_9.55 RIM=9.60 R� M H 6 (TRENCH DRAIN) I(in)=4.96 (12) WIER=6.5 " , W. v D I f , - • • RL D \ RIM_10.95 ( )- (12") I(in)=4.75 (12") 8�- �- - ,': :. O O O INV.-10.40 l(in)=6.80 (18 ) _ �p L B6 -.� o 0 0 8 \ ( )- I(o)t)44.50.75 1(12") R I out -2.45 (18 ) 1 x3D TW-28. 4.�� `20-, / D D - �- Q Q Z C•,� 1.,� \ D _ 4 U G�� *YD4 TO BE 4'0 MANHOLE WITH 2' SUMP AND BEEHIVE GRATE .-• �dV OX CB7 '�� (NEENAH MODEL NO. R-4340-C)Will I -' _ `• T�--34� W=21 .0 - = : °:•: .. � - � PIPE SCHEDULE Griffin -7 157 En ineenn PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE Gro p LLC g 7 • -- -' - - - - - - -` DMH3 to DMH4 166.8' 18"0 1.5% 0 F �6 \ 2 2 �--- �\ C65 to DMH4 5.9' 12"0 2.0% P.O Box 7061 SHALLOW �-� \ - _ \ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G EXCAVATION SWALE 2 - \ TEMPORARY \ DMH4 to DMH5 181.2' 18"0 1.5% Beverl MA 01915 �-. \ Sl \ \ \ y' S SILT SACKS \ cBs to DMH5 2.s' 12"� 2.0% - \ p �_ p \ YD4 to DMH5 26.0' 12"� 2.0% Tel. 978 927-5111 3 L� _`\ \N \ (TYP O F 4 cC B) Fax. 978-927-5103 ETAI N I N G WAL4 • ® \_ �� \� •.• DMH5 to DMH6 15.3' 18"0 2.5% E ALONG TOP O 36,E ------ - CB7 CB7 to DMH6 20.0' 12"0 2.0% AIL, SHEET C17) GEOGRID REQD ALL �, DMH6 to WQS2 53.x' 18"0 2.5% MRM PROJECT I I IN WALLS GREATE 38-- �\ MANAGEMENT, LLC TRD1 to WQS2 32.3 69'0 4.3% 16 LOT 232 THAN 11 ' EXPOSED #2 " SALEM, MA 0 WQS2 to DMH7 15.5 18 o 3.0% g N /F O BIT. CONC. PARKING HEIGHT /� NOTES: C821 to DMH7 104.0' 12"0 2.0% MAP 16 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TO BE CAPABLE OF MYERS I LOT 235 / SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. DMH7 to OF#1 14.6' 18"0 3.0% O #10 i 2) DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING MAP 16 MAP 16 N /F CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE PROVIDED CB16 to DMH11 81.2 12"0 0.5% LOT 380 FOR PERMITTING ONLY. CB17 to DMH11 30.0' 12"0 1.3% GRADING, DRAINAGE & MAP 16 LOT 6 LOT 234 PATTISON 3) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING EROSION CONTROL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. DMH11 to WQS5 150.0' 12"o 0.5% 233 N/F N/F 4) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT CB18 to WQS5 32.4' 12"0 3.9% PATTISON PROPOSED GROVE STREET ENTRANCE. PLAN #1 CSWI GGI N 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. WQS5 to OF#4 39.3' 12"o 5.6% SP ER I D AK OS GRAPHIC SCALE NOTE - ALL DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED EET PLASTIC PIPE OR .RCP. Sc_qJ% 1'=20' - - TR20 0 10 20 4o to E _ [3 EA fob No, 700 VER ll ,s 0 N ,30) WIDE) c IN Fie Names PIP/S/h- b C- 4 A a (pUBLIC WAY 1 inch = 20 ft. 0 D9E 6/20/12 _ I MAP 16 LOT 377 12 VC N /F \ OUTFALL I PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE Q / 2 VC \ 1`t CB1 YD3 12" * DMH12 OUTFALL HARMONY GROVE CORD. I=5.3± I RIM_20.80 RIM=25.50 RIM=9.60 (0. 48 ACRES) \ \ I INV.-17.80 INV.-14.50 I(in)_3.45 (24") \NK#7 CB2 DMH1 l(in)=4.85 (12")I(in)=7.50 f \ \ RIM=20.80 I(in)=7.50 (6") RIM= . l(out)=3.20 (24 » )INV.=17.80 l(in)=17.30 12" I I(in)=17.65 (12") WQS1 - DVER CANAL_ TIDAL CB3 _R �H R 1 \ N 0 RIM=20.00 1(out)-17.20 (12 ) STC 900 #3 I I INV.=17.00 DMH2 RIM_20.30 I(In)-15.15 (15») WOOD I& METAL CB4 RIM=20.20 I(in)=16.45 (12") -RIM=19.80 I(in)=15.90 (12") I(out)=14.90 (15 " )BRIDG W/ 8" PIPE INV.=16.80 I(in)=16.90 (12") DECK= EL. 9.2± EROSION I(out)=15.80 (15") WQS3 CB13 STC 00 __- CONTROLS \ I RIM=80.0 DMH3 R M 10 30 B A®#9 ® ""�• I INV.=7.00 RIM=20.43 WIER EXT.=6.5 I(in)=14.85 (15") I(in)=5.30 (24") (_0 BANK#14 cB20 I(In)=1 s.00 (2-6") I(out)=5.20 (24") U I m ® „� RIM=9.00 I(out)=13.10 (12")** BAN , --- INV.=6.00 " I B A N K�1 EXISTING I "'�� I(out)=14.75 (18 ) - � �-� -r I �-- YDl 6" **TO INFIL. FIELD 1 ! 1 RIM=21.75 U � W � _' -� _- 8_ �.�,� BRIDGE U W U WINV.=12.75 DMH10 5'0 MJH F-- W W - ABUTMENTS � W I I'- W R M 10.25 \ Q = I Q = Q = YD 2 6" I(in)=6.90 (12") RIM=20.75 G INV.=11.50 I(in)=6.90 (12") _CT 0�- C- I(out)=5.35 (24") *YD3 TO BE 4'0 MANHOLE WITH 2' SUMP AND BEEHIVE GRATE \ \ EROSIONI (NEENAH MODEL NO. R-4340-C) CONTROLS TRANSPORTATION I 1 11 1 11111111PIPE SCHEDULE PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE --- - I CB1 to DMH1 98.6' 12"0 0.5% m D 0 DTOP OF �- CB2 to DMH1 7.4' 12"0 2.0% F8 -� �� PR OP. COASTAL / 9 5 DMH1 to DMH2 131.8 12"0 1.0% T./C C. TH 10x6 OU TFALL #2 AN T 19 C E g BANK CB3 to DMH2 5.4' 12"0 2.0% � INW.=3.0 L� �� EROSION PLUG ALL EX�T�T. RET CONTROL DMH2 to WQS1 66.5' 15"0 1.0% D CB1 2 � � � � �!-�L D �9 12 OUTFALLS ALONG L T c64 to WQS1 17.8' 12"0 2.0% ---� WQS3 D D ALONG CANAL WALL. I 9x5 WQS1 to DMH3 3.2' 15"0 1.5% M H 10 - D -�- R EL. �. 6 + 1 x C 1 \ A N j TE B DMH3 to DMH4 166.8 18"0 1.5% AA B 3 \� < R DMH9 to DMH10 166.4' 24"0 0.5% L CB12 to DMH10 7.1' 12"0 1.4% I CB13 to DMH10 7.1' 12"0 1.4% \ EL. CB2 _ 3x � L RL � � B� �. �• �� ' / DMH10 to WQS3 5.0' 24"0 1.0% R L R L X O Cs�' C �� v A TH _� ® ® WQS3 to DMH12 86.5' 24"0 2.0% 1 3 OP. 6 q � � � � � C620 to DMH12 56.0' 12"0 2.0% � � ® � � No Date Description R 0 LEA R P O PO D U I LD T N G 1 TW=23.0 DMH12 to OF#2 10.0' 24"0 2.0% MIN. 57 SL E I NOTE - ALL DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED Revisions W GAR GE UNDER _ -�8 PLASTIC PIP OR t E RCP. I 0 DM 1 / 10 - UNITS) ` ` INV.=13.0) � �` Tw 3. G= 3. 0 - / TW=22.+0 R0 OSE ` - - PROP. 6 � 0 BUILD FF= 23. 0 ROOF LEAD R CLEANOUT GA G 7� -R� o� ROBERT `y MIN. 1 .5% SL E RAGE U #2 -� H. m TO DMH3 (TYPICAL) D ~--�D (4 �_ NDER o GRIFFIN CIVIL LAYD1 ` (4 7 VNO S TW=22.0 _ 0 � 36686 INV.-12. XO / D > 2. RL RL RL R� `� D tR RG= 1 \ �6 x 22x4521x X �� \ F 2 - �� - ., . : -. - 16- - - HP \ 2px3� - - _ X 111 CB2 - 82 _ \ :\j - Griffin \ I En ineerin D �---- �B 3 Group, LLC ® � . P.0 Box 7061 • 2 - - - - - - - 2 --_- - D'v � _ 14- ------ 2 �� i- s Center Suite 224G \ -22- - - - - - - �\ __D��� X 100 Cumming , 12"x18' Beverly, MA 01915 f W=27.5 / TW=28.0 \ TW=28.5 .__- - ��\ \ ® TEE - - 24- - - /26- �-3 -� \ -T� 32.0 _ DMH D \ �jp ' Tel. 978-927-5111 �- 1x6 5 7 �- \ T �\ 20X82 Fax: 978-927-5103 L� 21 68 22x68 i _ \ / '� , -� \ --- �-- �-\TW=26.0 D �� OP -._._._.=_--•-• -•--- -•-•-•=•-•=_-=77•--- i -._ •- 2 � \ \_ TP '� 6� D I MRM PROJECT _ _ _D MANAGEMENT, LLC \ -30-- - - - __� .� _F D _ -- __ '134- - - 32- - - - S I�ALLQ11�4LL-- - -34- - - _ _____ - -�- ��-� .-_--_ ��4� �2 - ._. 21X30 TW-28. SALEM, MA z - 3 4- - - - - - S IA�4LI€-- - -36 -_ - -�''- - -�� \ \`�- .;'•"-s- \ -_ _ �• _,�, I `L 3 8 -�,�s �_ ._ - _y - ._• _ _ NOTES: 8 --38 - - - - - - ,C -- --G _ \_ _ `3�=-��.�,• _ ,L --- -� 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TO BE CAPABLE OF �,-'�- X34. - SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. MAI 16 LOT MAP 1 ` o� 0- -3 36 3� --- ��,. �` �� 2) DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING \ _ 34- CONSTRUCTION.CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE PROVIDED 1224 LOT 225 TW 32 0� ~ ' r �� - FOR PERMITTING ONLY. GRADING, DRAINAGE & MAP 16 ❑ _ APPROX. - _-- 3) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING EROSION CONTROL N/F #34 N/F OT 227 #2� APPROX. \ SHED SHED ® T OF DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. 4) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. PLAN T C NLEY I TUC ER APPROX. N/F LIMIT OF '� EXCAVATIaN I LIMIT OF I LAWSON I EXCAVATION I I EXCAVATION #32 PROP. INFIL. FIELD _ s 25' WIDE x 90' LONG POND X o----\ ❑ GRAPHIC SCALE ScT 10=20' r I I I BLOCK RETAINING WAL 20 0 10 20 40 00 BTM FIELD = 12.5 job MAP 16 LOT 230 x W/ SWALE ALONG TOP �� BTM CHAMBERS = 13.0 GARDE _ SEE DETAIL, SHEET C17 IN FE>T C- 4B INV.= 13.0± (12 0 HEADER) N /F ( ) Fie Names P/P�s/h-b 1 inch = 20 ft o . (SEE DETAIL, SHEET C-7) DEMEULE x I ops/2o%2 MAP 16 1 nT d - - INSTALL FRAME & PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE N� EXIST. XIST. CB (ECB) Go :-A SOLID COVER cBs �0 CURB CUT RIM=8.10ON ECB DMI-185' (V1H RIM=11.30 RIM=10.65 I(IN)=6.80 .� / / INV.=8.30 I(in)=7.35 (12") v�O = / / I(in)=7.35 (12")I(OU ) 5.8�B19 / CB9 I(in)=7.35 (15") RIM_10.50 INV.-7.50 I(out)=7.25 (18") CB10&11 DMI-19 5'0 MJH N ------8_ ____ RIM=9.75 RIM=10.07 INV.=6.50 I(in)=6.40 (12") I(in)=6.40 (12") / iiiiiiiiii,100011 / f ' / CB14&15 I(in)=6.40 (18") EROSION I RIM=9.55 I(out)=6.30 (24") CONTROLS / 12" VC INV.=6.55 �0 / - � ' CB19 STC�450i - � (TYP) OUTFALL _ R ML8.oRATE) RiM =10.0 6.45 12" �C, BANK#7 ' INV.=9.5 I(in)=6.45 (12") VAvgL X. G // / o l(out)=6.20 I(in)=6.45 (12") \� �PN / / f CB23 \ �' / -� B PROPOSEDNOR WV=9.25 ............ C �° � �� -=_= OUTFALL 3 �H RI V TOP O I / / / _ 7 INV.=4.0±LL ' *CB23 TO HAVE BEEHIVE GRATE (NEENAH MODEL A = - NO. R-4340-C) COASTAL / -' .3 WOOD I& METAL 25 WIDE BANK � / BRIDG W/ 8" PIPE - - S . E. S. D . SEWER / �/ � �AN©K •6 � � PIPE SCHEDULE - �-- 8 DECK= EL. 9.2± EASEMENT PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE / / ® j i 1 AN 7 .1 A ® ® ® ®.. ®- CB8 to DMI-18 20.T 12"� 4.6� MB�i 1I��-� - PROVIDE RIP BANK#9 � RAP ARMOR AT o \ (-p CB9 to DMI-18 14.5 12"0 1.0% BANK#2 75 U ' CB23 to DMI-18 75.0' 15"0 2.5% WING WALLS (TYP) BANK#1 MAX. SLOPE 1 .5: 1 (H: V) DMI-18 to DMI-19 25.8' 18"0 3.3% CB10 to DMI-19 16.2' 12"0 0.6% ' "0 1.2% � EXIST. \ �. ~ W W CB11 to DMI-19 8.112 QS I \ Q = ' �\ DMI-19 to DMH10 166.4 24„0 0.5% MAP 16 LOT 378 RAILROAD \ \ CB14 to WQS4 14.5' 12"0 0.7% N/F _ f CROSSING \ 11 \ \ CB15 to WQS4 7.9' 12"0 1.3% HARMONY GROVE CORP. ---==- - K#6 EASEMENT 9 80 - WQS4 to OF#3 52.5' 12"0 4.0% (1 .02 - ACRES) i ' ANK#5 - B15 _ \ ,\ CB19 to ECB 2.0' 8"0 5.0% -g ' NOTE = CB19 to ECB IS TO BE 8"0 D.I. PIPE. - ALL OTHER DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED BANK#4EROSION TR A CK S PLASTIC PIPE OR RCP. R R .R . R . BANK#3 BRIDGE NOTE: # CONTROLS �,�(� - - r �r-t 1) DETAILED BRIDGE PLANS MEETING AASHTO STTS .-- C STANDARDS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. E -� B1° CB10BANK#2M 5 A CHU _ --\ i01 D No Date Description _ \ Re visions - i �-- .IB_ - - -- - - - \ �1v1 H8 D �10 011�x BLOCK -� \ \ -__ 1` - o ` - �' i � / � � ' -�-- Z -- RET. WALL TOW=1 4.5 ROBERT y \ 3x - H. m C) GRIFFIN y ER -zoN \ \ 1 40 \ 1 CIVIL = o BVF '� #3ssas e \ / TW 24.0 \1 \ \ PROP. 6': o� _ \ � ROOF LE, MAP 16 LOT 216 � / / � / \ \ \ MIN. 1 .5r ZO, 1-2 ` 4� J TO DMH1 N/F X16 \-- RAYMOND \`� \ \ BLOCK RETAINING WALL ` \ \ TW ARIES T423.0 �\ �c�'g \ (SEE DETAIL, SHEET C-7) \ 16x0 \CB23 13 Griffin \ \ -\ \ Engineering _ \ TW=16.0 •� Group, LLC TW=30.0 TW-22.0 \ \ - • \, 12x85 •� i' P.O Box 7061 •� ��L-22�M- R 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G 32 -.-. -•- -• �' \ X_ Beverly, MA 01915 A x Tel: 978-927-5111 _ 36\ �� '\ '�-` -� `\ \26� \ _ \ \\•� \ =, \\ _ Fax: 978-927-5103 STOtVE RST \ \ \ \ \ _ .� MRM PROJECT MAP 16 LOT 217 L VVA2\ �� \ �� \ CB1 MANAGEMENT, LLC I N /F APPROX. \ \ \ \ �. \ NOTES: SALEM, MA \, \ SHALLOW \\ 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TO BE CAPABLE OF S A R K E S LIMIT OF \ \\ \ \\ SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. #12 EXCAVATION \ WALE \\�\ \ \ 2 - 2) DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE PROVIDED FOR PERMITTING ONLY. c \ \ \\ ` T 3) DETAILED BRIDGE PLANS MEETING AASHTO STANDARDS GRADING DRAINAGE &6 5 \\ - REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. \ 21 68 DOWNSRA TOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDINGEROSION CONTROL BLOCK RETA'hNI�IG �A�LL •�. LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. 32� W`" -S.WALE ALO TOP \ 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. PLAN E IM AP 16 LOT 218 \ -A \ _ SIL VER cIm SE��ETAIL, -&HEET C- V " N/F --( �--- -30- GRAPHIC SCA s (PUBLIC WAY FLORES '� \ \ - -32- LE s� 1"=20' a v - 700 v 1 0 8 IN Fie _ C 20 0 10 20 40 so G T - M A F� 16 L O T inch = 20 ft. p�P�S/t' b #4 D� 6/20/12 d Q i— = I— UwIUw � � -�.. 1pQ 00w BUFF S S -01 :2 cn %\ R . R . TRACKS AUTHORITYTF DUMPSTER I D __ D D D O AREA D _—_ D D D D O � EXISTING EXE 4" A TER W S 0 0 o • 9. 6 STORAGE SMH2 AREA o RIM=10.3 I EXISTING • 6 INV.=6.65 I OFFICE ��\`� SEE Z NOTE 2 � 9. 6 + /�/O BUILDING a � _ I RT S o -A H VER E - , N7-1D Rq TE S X1ST6 SEWER L OC/< s � o =� SMH3L S O /13L s RIM=10.3 - GRAN/ 8"fib SDR35 PVC EL• 9. 6,+ — S 8" � �- � �� TE B S=0.004 FT/FT -- RL S 0 SDR35 L 0 CK — 8 0 RL P VC _` T _ DING I s s_o. o0 BIT CC �. AL1 0 VICE. RLQ S FT/FT — -_Nc• PAT W = E� OPE. I RLQ_ �_D�� H . 9. 6-+ RL �RL S � � RL_� S RL S SRL SMH4ABANDON EXIST. PROPOSED S RIM-10.3 S WATER SERVICES No Date Description REMOVE ALL OSED PROP. 8 0 D �';� INV= 0.3 R & VALVE PIT PER Revisions EXISTING ON-STIE W BU�LD�NG PVC BUILDING S X�S1. W Q CITY STANDARDS ® O S I / GA RA �3 SEWER SERVICE. � ECif UTILITIES UNLESS GE UND �S � I NOTED OTHERWISE. (4- 7_ V ER MIN. 2� SLOPE. ,off - y L` N/ TS) EXIST. WATER �' EXIST. Q MIN. 18 �/ VALVE �w Q 8(J�� SEPARATION MDC TRAP 2 �O PIT o� ` ER ZON � — # .�0 s ESMH1 1 �� RoeERr y H. cn ' AT CROSSING RIM 11 .25 A /� m „ M H S GRIFFIN -+ c� WA R CIVIL G I(out)=7.0 o EXIST. 8 A�0 #36686 ' W EXIST. 10" � S WER '�T S S PROPOSED W �Ya �' W W ESMH � TRIPLE GATE � W �� R S S VALVE 0/. Dw L G �—i— Dy� 0 D D _____— �� G— D G G --- G W O F C-,) ­V D — �.� w .. -- .L• - V. Gfirrif 1 ao CONNECT TO Engineering y Y o PROP. GAS SERVICE EXISTING SMH =' Group, LLC REMOVE & RESET PROP. SEPARATE 4"� . SIZE BY UTILITY RIM=11 .30 _ P.0 Box 7061 ° UTILITY POLE. PROVIDER PROP. 8"0 CLDI INV.-5.15 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G S� RISER DOWN TO POTABLE WATER SERVICE & (SEE NOTE 2) Beverly, MA 01915 ETC FIRE PROT. SERVICES. SEE PIPE. MIN. 5 XFORMER PADS. NOTE 1 &3. (TYP EACH COVER y S Tel., 978-927-5111 BUILDING) WALL G Fax., 978-927-5103 ALL MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC 16 LOT 232 #2 SALEM, MA N F I BIT. CONC. PARKING NOTES: / 1) FIRE PROTECTION. BUILDING SERVICES TO BE SIZED BY MECHANICAL MAP 16 ENGINEER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. MYERSLOT 235 / 2) EXISTING SEWER SERVICE IS CURRENTLY BRICKED—UP. CONTRACTOR TO #1 REMOVE BRICK AND VIDEO INSPECT EXISTING SERVICE CONNECTION TO THE —.� MAP 16 MAP 16 N/F EXIST. SEWER SCHEDULE MAIN. CITY TO DETERMINE IF SERVICE IS ACCEPTABLE FOR REUSE OR I AP 16 LOT LOT 234 LOT 380 PATTI SON ESMH1 REQUIRED.NEEDS TO BE REPLACED.CONTRACTOR TOEPLACE REBUILD SERVICE INVE T AITH 10"D REPAIRR35 PVC DAMAGE IF UTILITIES PLAN � M �6 N F RIM=10.26 BRICK REMOVAL. 233 N/F / NINV=3.08 3) COORDINATE BUILDING SEf2vICE LOCATIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINE 1 CSWIGGIN PATTISON DRAWINGS. 4) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND. SPERIDAKOS ESMH2 GRAPHIC SCALE ScaLe.- 1•=20' z I RIM=11 .28 '° �° '° ,Bo INV=5.13 r Job No. goo I? _ N 3 0' WI D E/ ( IN F'EE'T' ) ��� PIP�s/h—b v a E (pUE3L►C WAY inch = 4o rt D8&' 6/20/12 0 S d' MAP 16 LOT 377 0 12 VC \ I / 12 VC /N F OUTFALL I fl / i OUTFALL HARMONY GROVE CORP. I=5.3f aNK#71=4. 3± (0. 48 ACRES) \ n I T. TIDAL i NO RSH RIVER CANAL \ N I WOODI& METAL BRIDGW/ 8" PIPE DECK= EL. 9.2± BANK#10 BANK#11 BANK#14 Q BANK#12 BANK#13 BANK 15 EXISTING U w I U W REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE U W I U w ~ W WPUMP STATION & ABUTMENTS ~ w I II-- w M Q = IQ H Q = Q = '60110_ — FSI FM FORCE MAIN. CUT & 72 � FM 1 .5" FORCE MAIN CAP EXIST. 4" SERVICE w I BAY TRANSPORTATION 11 Jill 11111111111111 111 11 IiAIIIIIII 111 1111 1111111 1 1-1444-441111111 DUMPSTER — I— TOP OF AREA I —�-- COASTAL BIT. CONC. PATH �� GRgN1T BANK --�— — SMH1 BLOC Noun PLUG ALL EXIST RE�. --- D ----_ RIM—11 ..00 ,� �A�-L T D p D N V.=7.45 D p OUTFALLS ALONG 0 D R CANAL WALL. L. NI TE 9 6 13 LOCK R SIMH2 4 E T 1/I/ RIM='10.3 �- ALL T INV.=6.65 Y ^� BST �EL. 9. 6 �- RL RL RL RL RL S - CONC. D S 0 SDR35 P A TH -� PROPOSE �, PVC 80 D . BUILDING o S S=0.004 �_ PROPOSED BUILD #1 SE R SERVICE. 4 FT�FT t No date Description ® S i MIN. % SLOPE. � Revisions W/ GARAG NDER �i S FENCE ENCLOSEDTRASH & RE Y (47— NITS) S o PROPOSED S tiYa ROPOSE 0 IN STORAGE AREA CONNECT FLOOR � BUILD (TYP EACH BUILDING VVI G �NC�' PROPOSED 8 RL_� o� ROBERT ) BERT y DRAINS TO MDC TRAP. GA #2 PVC BUILDING F ". N v GRIFFIN (TYP EACH BUILDING) MDC TRAP `�-D �47— NEER CIVIL # --- _D (.JNA S SEWER SERVICE. 11 '° #36686 � RIM=11 .80 J MIN. 2% SLOPE. D ` RL RL RL RL RL- R R I(out)=8.0 --_D L R ® ��� jv,�Z RL p REMOVE EXIST. `� a DRAINAGE SYSTEM 0 c s W W G __ ®W W ® W C - R� - Uriffin D D w G y R I En ineering � I ----- _�� - �� Group, LLC i— D ® _ - PROP. 80 CLDI PROP. SEPARATE 4"0 D D ----_ _ G 0 °�` _ P.0 Box 7061 PIPE. 5' COVER POTABLE WATER SERVICE & D p G G 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G FIRE PROT. SERVICES. SEE — D �- D p ® � G , Beverly, MA 01915 NOTE 1 &2. (TYP EACH . tiYo 1 TH RLTS�— __— D W G � G o Tel: 978-927-5111 NG BUILDING) --83.00K S _ D VV �� Fax: 978-927-5103 D D —p I MRM PROJECT PROP. HYDRANT — �� \D �_ _ MANAGEMENT, LLC (TYP OF 3) — 1 0 D SALEM, MA o I _ I PROP. CONCEPT INFILTRATION PAD MOUNT o . MAI 16 LOT MAP 1 FIELD TRANSFORMERS 1224 LOT 225 (TYP OF 3) NOTES: MAP 16 I 1) FIRE PROTECTION BUILDING SERVICES TO BE SIZED BY MECHANICAL. SHED ENGINEER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. UTILITIES PLAN N/F3 4 N/F OT 227 �2 8 SHED® I r 2) COORDINATE BUILDING SERVICE LOCATIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINE E T C N LEY , TUC ER N F DRAWINGS. / I� LAWSON E]-C� 3) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND.� I X32 GRAPHIC SCALE S cQLe: 10=20' 40 0 20 40 80 160 MAP 16 LOT 230 JQb No•; 700 IN FEET PIP/S�1-b I Fie Nam C- 5B 9 N /F c � E .o D E M E U L E I inch = 40 ft. D&k- 6/20/12 \\ EXIST. XIST. CB (ECB) o ZO CURB CUT RIM-8.10 'A I(IN)=6.80 1s AFF Qj I(OU )-5.85 AX NDERGR9.lJ-PdD ELEGTCAL .� j 12 VC �r 50 � � � CON LE-C'TI ON j I OUTFALL :-� , S �- FOR BRIDGES / BANK#7VA ,� B . PLUG EXIST. NOR H RIV TOP OF CONNECTION _ A .— COASTAL WOOD I& METAL 25 WIDE BANK i ' / BANK 4 BRIDG� W/ 8" PIPE S. E. S. D . SEWER r # DECK= EL. 9.2± EASEMENT - / BAN 7 BANK#3 ANK#8 BANK#9 I � Q0 BANK#2 _ U I m BANK#1 - _ �-- = I— a UWIUw � EXIST. Q = I Q EMAP 16 LOT 378 RAILROAD p :2 w _ — N /F BANK 6 CROSSING M HARMONY GROVE CORP. --`r # EASEMENT (1 . 02 ACRES) BANK#5 . ._---- BANK#4T R /�CK S BANK#3 R � TT BANK#2 SACH — M BANK#1 — . � D No Date Description ° I Revisions BULK TRASH D STORAGE AREA I , WITHIN FENCED ENCLOSURE wV .sa ROBERT �s N� YFi CIO m OR o GRIFFIN -+ lip CIVIL. gv 90 144 #36686 F PROP. 8"0 CLDI I PIPE. 5' COVER MAP 16 LOT 216 I FENCE E N /F TRASH 8 RAYMOND IN STOF ABANDON EXIST. I (TYP EA( j Grann ,,..,.- 6 0 WATER MAIN ® I Engineering BEYOND I Group, roup, LLC P.O Box 7061 R L R 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 Tel: 978-927-5111 Fax: 978-927-5103 77777- STON RE T MRM PROJECT E CLMANAGEMENT, LLC MAP 16 LOT 217s Z- SALEM, MA N /F �� v� 6x8 PROP. P SARKES O I _ � 2 v�. TEE PIPE. co46 O ��•Q�- _ #6MAINTAIN EXISTINGUTILITIES PLAN — — — 6"0 WATER MAIN CONNECTION TO I NOTES: E MAP 16 LOT 218 BEAVER STREET 1) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND. SIL VER N/F IGRAPHIC SCALEScQL% 1"=2o' (PUBLIC WA Y FLORES � 0 20 40 80 ,BO L — Job No.: 700 ( C- 5C IN FEET ) Fie Names P/P/s/h—b MAI 16 LOT 1- inch 40 ft. D-Qt% 6/20/12 E #4 0 d SEE TABLE OF � 3000 PSI CONCRETE - '--- INLET PIPE FINISH THRUST BLOCK AGAINST . GRADE BEARING AREAS UNDISTURBED -' \ / FOR THE AREA - / � .-,•.,.. ��, MATERIAL OF CONCRETE 5° \ / REQUIRED ' MAX. SEE .TABLE OF GROUND SURFACE THRUST BLOCK •` • ' ' BEARING AREAS 4 WATER MAIN .,'•:; .,'••.•, •. - _ ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX FOR THE AREA OF CONCRETE ROUND FRAME AND 2'0 OPENING IN TOP AANDCOVER REQUIR D FINISHED COVER SET AT FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. Of z GRADE w g LO H 45° TAPPING TEE. MAX. _ '. CONC. COLLAR CONFIRM SIZES FLANGED / PLAN OF THRUST 12" MIN. '' "''r'' PRIOR TO CONST. f 1. BOLTED GATE BLOCK AT BEND VALVE _ - // H/2 M A�(. ADJUST TO GRADE PRECAST CL 52 CLDI WATER WITH COURSES ECCENTRIC CONC. OF BRICK CONE OR COLLAR •• • FLAT TOP MAIN ` CONE STEPS PRECAST RISER TEE / \ / /�\\\/ 3000 PSI CONCRETE WATER MAIN � BACKING AGAINST PIPE 0 GATE VALVE UNDISTURBED MATERIAL PER PLAN RISER N.T.S. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK AT PLUG NON-SHRINK GROUT 4' ' N.T.S. PRECAST BASE MANHOLE i 3000 PSI CONCRETE tI Mie BASE t AGAINST h--6" Min L* BACKFILL TO SUBGRADE W/ UNDISTURBED 45° MAX. ='• CLEAN GRANULAR BACKFILL COMPACT TO 95% MOD. PROCTOR CLEAN GRANULAR BACKFILL MATERIAL SEE TABLE OF 6" CRUSHED THRUST BLOCK STONE BAS NO STONES LARGER THAN 3" I BRICK MASONRY OR COMPACT TO 95% MOD. PROCTOR © BEARING AREAS 3000 PSI CONCRETE FOR THE AREA PLAN OF THRUST OF CONCRETE NOTES: AS REQ'D BLOCK AT TEE REQUIRED 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. IN./LINEAL FT. AND 0.12 SQ. IN. (BOTH WAYS) BASE BOTTOM. APPROXIMATE. LOCATION 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. I SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 4. LEBARON FRAME AND COVER CATALOG NO. LA246 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 12" WATER, SEWER, OR DRAIN. EXACT LOCATION TO BE SET AT MINIMUM DEPTH OR DETERMINED IN ADVANCE 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. INVERTS AS INDICATED. 6. TONGUE & GROOVE JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIN. 2" MIN.* 0 000,o 00 cop GROUND SURFACE. OF CONSTRUCTION 7. SEE FORCE MAIN CONNECTION DETAIL SHEET C-9. °ooOpO o ° 0 0 8. FOUNDATION SUPPORT FOR STRUCTURE PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 0 ° ` 3000 PSI CONCRETE /�� - - 4'0 PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE ° °0 BACKING AGAINST - SIEE TABLE OF HYDRANT TO BE 00 0°0 6" MIN - BOTTOM UNDISTURBED MATERIAL THRUST BLOCK AMERICAN DARLING j ° ° o 0 o° AND SIDES o. B62B OPEN RIGHT. N.T.S. 45 BEARING AREAS CLMAIN 3/8" CRUSHED STONE MAX. FiOR THE AREA NOTES: ADJUSTABLE VALVEFINISH OR SCREENED GRAVEL BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION PROVIDE JOINT RESTRAINTS : � OF CONCRETE GRADE (TIE RODS OR MEGALUG) FOR a = RIEQUIRED BOX COVER * FOR DUCTILE IRON OR RCP PIPE: TOP OF STONE IS MID-DEPTH (SPRING LINE) OF CONDUIT. ALL JOINTS WITHIN 15 OF 45' BEND, WITHIN 20 OF DEAD N BACK UP HIYDRANT Wlll� END HYDRANT, AND WITHIN 15' OF MAIN LINE TAPS. �:'. = 6" FLANGED & 1 6/20/12 REVISE CURBING AND SIDEWALK c TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING SECTION BOLTED {;ATE 6 NC Fr. 31000 PSI DETAIL TO CONCRETE. ''•'•� VALVE � o � CONCRETE PLACED GROUND No Date Description . \ AGAINST UNDISTURBED \45 BEND SURFACE P 00 PSI CONCRETE 0 MATERIAL ROTATE AS REQUIRED N .T.S. Y-BRANCH 30BACKIING AGAINST °00° Revisions THRUST BLOCK SECTION UNDISTURBED MATERIAL o•O00 9 A 0 SEE TABLE ON THRUST °• - BROOM BLOCK BEARING AREA a PROVIDE 10 CU.. FT. PLAN - 3/8' CRUSHED STONE TO 4 MIN COVER FOR 111E AREA OF ' � °''O°o 12" ABOVE DRAIN HOLE. 6"QJ PVC FINISH CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK CONCRETE REQUIRED. ��\�/ 4' WIDTH U.N.O. BUILDING SEWER FINISH D x 6" HYDRANT 6" FLANGED MIN. SLOPE 2% M SLOPE TO DRAIN * GRADE 00* N.T.S. TEE OUTLET WITH SPOOL PIECES) LLAT STONE OR �° .° - VALVE RESTRAINING ..'s ROBERT s JOINT CONCRETE BLOCK At° H 4" • . o o o • GRAVEL BEDDING SEWER MAIN - � GRIFFIN 8" . ..° _ o TABLE OF MINIMUM BEARING AREAS IN SQ. FT. .0 Al #CIVIL �Q • ••° AGAINST UNDISTURBED MATERIAL UNDISTURBED 6xs-W1.4xW1.4 WWF MA TERIAL PREPARED WIRE MESH TYPICAL HYDRANT ASSEMBLY WITH DRAIN SUBGRADE GRAVEL PRESSURE 150 PSI SECTION � '� Z BASE 3,000 PSI COURSE CONCRETE PIPE TYPE OF SOIL CONDITION N.T.S. BUILDING CONNECTION * WALK TO BE ADA COMPLIANT UNLESS NOTED SIZE BEND A B C D E F G N .T.S. OTHERWISE. MAX SLOPE = 1/4- PER FOOT TEES & 8.5 4.5 3 2.5 1.5 1.5 1 A, CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6„ PLUGS Gnogineenng up, LLC N.T.S. and 90 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 1.5 smaller 45 6.5 3.5 2.5 2 1.5 1 1 1 TTTT P.O Box 7061 22 1 2 3.5 2 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G TEES & 15.5 8 5.5 4 3 2 1.5 Beverly, MA 01915 8 • PLUGS TRENCH WID O o KEY: " Tel: 978-927-5111 ►► 90 21.5 11 7.5 5.5 4 3 2.5 FINISHED GRADE °o 08 � O °o 1. 1.5 CLASS 1 BIT. CONCRETE TOP COURSE 45 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 1.5 000 0000 0 0 0000 o Fax: 978-927-5103 TYPE 1-1 (M3.11.0 -TABLE A). 22 1 /2 6 3 2 1.5 1 1 1 " ° 00 0 O o 0 00 0 (• 2" CLASS 1 BIT.)CONCRETE BINDER COURSE M3.11.0 - TABLE A " 6 WIDE YELLOW o 0 0 0 0 O 3. 12 DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE °° o ° o° MRM PROJECT 12 MARKER TAPES -- _ :. •• - SUB-BASE (M2.01.7) BITUMINOUS ONCRETE CURB TYPE OF SOIL CONDITION ='= : CONCRETE - - - - - - :r_: ::_ _ , 4. COMPACTED SUBGRADE MANAGEMENT LLC TOP COURSE FINISH GRADE 2-0 MIN. WELL COMPACTED ' A - SOFT CLAY; FINE LOOSE SAND " CONDUITS (TYP.) �� ' SALEM, MA 2 -6 MAX. FILL FREE OF B - SAND & CLAY, MIXED OR IN LAYERS; FINE CONFINED SAND LARGE STONES 2gl°� j`\j�/�\\\/ C - HARD DRY CLAY �� \\ BITUMINOUS / \ y CONCRETE D - COARSE SAND \ BINDER12" E - GRAVEL COURSE o o „: c _ Ha DR ROCK 00 FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT Gc0CEMENT CONCRETE O- II_6" NOTES: %/rC / \ �i�\\` N.T.S. 1. FOR FITTINGS WITH LESS THAN 22 I DEFLECTION USE BEARING AREAS FOR 22 BEND. SPACE APPROX. DETAILS COMPACTED 1� 1t COMPACTED 2. JOINTS SHALL NOT BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE. BEARING AREAS MAY BE DISREGARDED FOR 3" APART (TYP.) GRAVEL BASE SUBGRADE NOTE: E TRENCHES IN ROCK WHERE THE TOP OF THE ROCK FACE IS AT OR ABOVE THE CROWN OF 2" MIN. TAMPED SAND GRAVEL BORROW FILL AND DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE SHOULD MEET THE GRADATION THE PIPE. HOWEVER, CONCRETE BACKING SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE PIPE AND ROCK FACE. ABOVE AND BELOW CONDUITS SPECIFICATIONS ESTABLISHED IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY CONCRETE CURB DEPARTMENT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES". THESE LAYERS N.T.S. SHOULD BE PLACED IN LOOSE LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED 12-INCHES AND BE COMPACTED TO CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREA UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TRENCH AT LEAST 95 PERCENT OF THE MATERIALS MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DERTERMINED BY 5cQ1% 1 -40 ASTM DESIGNA11ON D-1557. N.T.S.T.S. FOR MULTIPLE CONDUITS 700P NOT TO SCALE Fie Names p/p/sA-b C6 - a x Dltt12/20/11 E MENOMINEE 0 I i 12" 8" 15" CHDPE PIPE 18"0 CHDPE FROM WQS#1 OVERFLOW 12" 8" INV. 14.85 INV.=14.75 24" 48" = STORMTECH SC-740 DMH3 _'•, ,' .' . SOLID END CAPS STORMTECH SC-740 48 PT# SC740E CHAMBERS. (TYP OF 60) INSPECTION PORT BTM OF BED oPnow►L TOP SLAB " (TYP OF 5) SPACE 56"f O.C. FRAME & COVER EL. 12.5 SQUARE FRAME AND BTM EL. 13.0 TO GRADE. (TYP 12"� CHDPE COVER SET AT FINISHED OPnONAL TOP SLAB FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. OF 3) INV.=13.1 GRADE SQUARE FRAME AND GRATE SET AT FINISHED FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. GRADE CONC. COLLAR CONC. COLLAR 12" MIN. ••"••• •'•'• 120 STORMTECH 8" 12" MIN. :r �'��� 12" ADJUST TO GRADE I_DOUBLE MANIFOLD CONE . .. 24 ADJUST TO GRADE " =.;;-- i OF BRICK WITH COURSES 25' o PT# 1552AN7415 WITH COURSES '' = 8 °� (TYP OF 2) OF BRICK CONE : 24" + STORMTECH CHAMBER END CAPS RISER o PT# SC740EPE12B = (TYP OF 5) 48" (TYP U.N.O.) Fa- (SEE NOTE 8) RISER 9o' 5" , 1' STONE 12"0 STORMTECH PERIMETER 90• MANIFOLD BEND t; PIPE SIZES PER PLAN PIPE SIZE PER PLAN ON SIDES INFILTRATION FIELD DETAIL PT# 1298AN74 & END N.T.S. BASE 48" SUMP MIN. OIL/DEBRIS H OOD BASE - "SNOUT" TYPE BY LEBARON OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT FINISH GRADE. PROPOSED 0 PAVED PARKING L T . NATIVE FILL. 6" CRUSHED _ BRICK MASONRY OR 6" STONE BASE L--17 " •= • SMALL CAST IRON FRAME & COVER (H20). 3000 PSI CONCRETE- 6" CRUSHED " 3 8" CRUSHED STONE SET ON 2 GRADING RINGS & MORTAR BED STONE BASE 3/4 - 1.5 INCH WASHED, / OR 2 COURSES BRICK AND MORTAR. SECTION VIEW 6" CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE GRANULAR WELL-GRADED OR SCREENED GRAVEL PLACE CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND NOTES: 6" THICKNESS MIN. 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. SOIL. 95% COMPACTION STRUCTURE. 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. NOTES: SECTION VIEW FILTER FABRIC 7 OZ/SY BELOW GRADING RINGS NON-WOVEN WRAP INSPECTION PORT WITH SCREW-IN CAP IN./LINEAL FT. AND 0.12 SQ. IN. (BOTH WAYS) BASE BOTTOM. 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. 96" INFIL. FIELD COMPLETELY SC-740 CHAMBER 3,000 PSI CONCRETE 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. MAX. LOAM & SEED 4. LEBARON LA-246 FRAME & SOLID COVER (MARKED DRAIN) OR APPROVED IN./LINEAL FT. AND 0.12 SQ. IN. (BOTH WAYS) BASE BOTTOM. V60 CHAMBERS PROPOSED 5 UNITS WIDE, 12 LONG EQUIVALENT. 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. ( ) 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 4. LEBARON LF-248-2 THREE FLANGE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 6. TONGUE & GROOVE JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIN. 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. T= _ -III- : - . .:_: • .. : .. .. : .. : ..:. _ " z. .. 7. FOUNDATION SUPPORT PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 6. TONGUE & GROOVE JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIN'. rr 7. FOUNDATION SUPPORT PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 18 4 PVC RISER - I_1=1 . : _ : . : " MIN. ':`. " .r REVISE INFILTRATION FIELD TO 8. DMH 5, 8, 9 & 10 TO BE 5'� PRECAST MANHOLES. -III o 0 96 1 s/2o/12 =I 6 Mm. 18 SC-740 CHAMBERS. ADD _ :.,:: !III MIN. MAX. TYPICAL MULTIPLE INLET PLAN PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE 4'0 PRECAST CATCH BASIN - " VIEW TO STORMCEPTOR DETAIL _ �-I 30 REVISE PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE AND YARD DRAIN N . T. S. N . T. S. III-I _ DETAIL r I-III o - - � - - - - 6" Mim• , � � � � _ _ INSPECTION PORT TO BE III-III-III=1 I I-1 �= I I-►I I=1 I I-►�I-I�� I I III .I I - -I I 1=1 11=1 11=1 I- ATTACHED THROUGH No Date I Description SC-310 CHAMBER KNOCK-OUT LOCATED t BTM OF SC-740 5 AT CENTER OF CHAMBER Revisions BTM OF FIELD 49 ELEV. 13.0 51" 12" MI1,V. TYP. FILTER FABRIC 7 OZ/SY ELEV. 12.5 NON-WOVEN, WRAP INFIL. ESHWT 8.4' FIELD COMPLETELY Rj er Rj er INFILTRATION FIELD INSPECTION PORT DETAIL Concrete Pipe Division J MATERIALS Concrete Pipe IVISIon MATERIALS- P TYPICAL CROSS SECTION N.T.S. Mq ® STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBER SYSTEM ROBERT �y STC 4501 Precast Concrete StormceptorSTC 900 Precast Concrete Stormceptor "•T s• GRH. IFFIN (450 U.S. Gallon Capacity) (900 U.S. Gallon Capacity) 11)PROPOSED FIELD DIMENSIONS 25'X90. A CIVIL 9� #36686 24t0 Outlet Frame and Cover (No Grate) Stormceptor " 2) MANUFACTURED BY STORMTECH OF 20 BEAVER ROAD, SUITE 104, E WETHERSFIELD, CT 06109 USA 888-892-2694 6" 6 , Frame and Cover 32==� pip 0 Oriifice ' + 5" Grade Adjusters To �-2,d. !2 Suit Finished Grade Grade Adjusters to Plate Suit Finished Gra _ 240 0 e- •. 8rr fi"� Oil DRAINTECH POLYOLEFIN a Port " 12"0 ATRIUM GRATE ■ ■ c " 4"0 J PLACE 3" THICK LAYER " a Varies To A �� e " G". I � Min.15" High 72"0 Inlet Outlet OF 1 STONE GRATE. Engineering w/ 4" Cap Match Grade - MIN. 18" ALL AROUND. SLOPE TO DRAIN Stormceptor Group, LLC " Insert Stormcept& COMPACTED 4"0 Oil Port Insert Outlet Weir EARTH P.O Box 7061 * Inlet Inlet Weir Access o enin 6"0 Oil _ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Outlet See Nolte opening Port =l I I I=I Beverly, MA 01915 4"0 Outlet 6"� (See note #2) !=I (=III= " Riser Pipe a Orifice - Plan View =1 I- __ -�-I I-I I 18 Plate " Tel: 978-927-5111 I I-III=1 I-I 1=I I- -III-_- 6 0 Oil _ _ _ o o I -_ _ Fax: 978-927-5103 Weir Port -I I-I I=1�I-I�I-I�I' I I�I I�I= I I- 12"� CORRUGATED " DEPTH, i l l=III-III-III-III-I =1 1=III-111-1 I - HDPE RISER! s " Dro Tee " AS REQ DI=1 240 Outlet MRM PROJECT _ Inle Pipe ;. ;• 'I�I=I�I-I�I-I�I--I�I-� 0 ti Outlet Pip ;III=1 1=I 1=III=III=. 24 � Drop L12"0 Inlet 4"0 Outlet M'n. * Inlet Outlet p Pipe -I I I_II_ MANAGEMENT LLC Down Pipe Riser Pip - (Removable) III-1 I=1 1=III=1 " -III-1 I I_ o SALEM, MA 48" *If Require 8 ' " q a d a. - - a 12"0 CORRUGATED Insert Tee Here Section Thru Chamber 6"0 Orifice j HDPE 90' ELBOW W/ 12"� HDPE PIPE 8" Access opening GASKETED ENDS MIN. 2% SLOPE ° °- (Tee Oipening to Face Side Wall) Plate (See note 2) c Section Thru Chamber Plan View COMPACTED CRUSHED Multiple InIeL. STONE BASE DETAILS II Notes: Notes: 1. The Use Of Flexible Connection is Recommended at The Inlet and Outlet Where Applicable. 1. The Use Of Flexible Connection is Recommended at The Inlet and Outlet Where Applicable. 2. The Cover Should be Positioned Over The Inlet Drop Pipe and The Oil Port. 2. The Cover Should be Positioned Over The Outlet Drop Pipe and The Oil Port. YARD DRAIN #1 &2 3. The Stormceptor System is protected by one or more of the following U.S. Patents: #4985148, 3. The Stormceptor System is protected by one or more of the following U.S. Patents: #4985148, #5498331, #5725760, #5753115, #5849181, #6068765, #6371690. #5498331, #5725760, #5753115, #5849181, #6068765, #6371690. N.T.S. Sc�l 1'=40' 4. Contact a Concrete Pipe Division representative for further details not listed on this drawing. 4. Contact a Concrete Pipe Division representative for further details not listed on this drawing. NOTES: 1) THE BASIS FOR THIS DRAWING IS DRAWING STD-1110A PREPARED JQb No•: 700 Rinker 027 Rinker 028 BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. Fie Name: p/p/s/h-b C- 7 Dd% 12/20/11 .o o - s INLET D A B INLET D A B 4" 3'-6"0 S-0" 2'-6' 8" 5'-0"0 6'-O" 5'-0" -�� ,d. .: : •..' _ = .= ° • _.- .- 5" S-6'0 5'-0" 4'-0" 5'-6"x 5'-6" 4'-6" 4'-0' NOTE == ._• -p.+= .. - -1 : = .... . ': x. ' :. " 8 11/16" 3'-6"x 3'-6' 4'-0' 3'-O" 6'-0"0 4'-0' 3'-6" . ;a ;. : _': - : - ° . = " ® ECONODRAIN w w 1) THE BASIS FOR THIS DRAWING IS DRAWING STD-1001 - " 24 ® ® �` 4-0 3-s 3'-0' s-o x 6'-0" 3-0 2-s PREPARED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. 0000000000 00000P0000 0000900000 0000000000 ®®®�® SERIES #6 " - » w w BUILDING o e e e ®®�®® TRENCH SYSTEM 6 4—0 x 4-0 3-0 2#-6* 6'-6"0 3—6 3—0 w , w , w . w , w , w / w FACE 00' 0000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 �®®®®® CLAMPING 4-s 3-0 2-6 6'-6"x s-s 3-0 2-6 "°;�.: ,e ':;t a .� •. •.. , : ®® BOLT 6" 4'-0'0 5'-0' V-6" 10" 5'-6"0 7'-6" 6'-6" ° o•. `' •Y 4'—O"x 4'-0" 4'-0" 3'-6" ' - DOWNSPOUT - STANDARD - _ _� � . . — 4'-6"0 4'-0" 3'-s" s-ow x 6'-0" 5'-6" 4-6" PLAN VIEW H-20 CAST IRON GRATE I I - I VARIES 4'-6'x 4'-6" S-s" 3'-0' 6'-0"0 6'-6" 5'-6" #EGO8241 CIA I III ,:I i(—I 5'-0"0 S-6" 3'-Ow EPS FORM 06 31% OPEN AREA 1=I- 5'-o"x 5'-0" S-O" 2'-6" 6'-6"x 6'-6" 5'-0" 4'-0" NYLOPLAST CLEANOUT FRAME & GRATE30.2 SQ. INCHES PER LINEAR FOOT EXPANSION / —III _ END CAP ADJUST (FLOW=196 GPM) CONTRACTION �I=I — GRADE DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER 24'-0" —III —I I I=H I i I I z PLUMBI NG INLET ICONTRACTORPE TO BE SIZED INSERTED IN RISER N- FINISHED PIPE SLOPED H I ( ( �g NOTES: GRADE » DRAIN BOTTOM I I =) I=I FOR INLETS LARGER THAN 10" THE 6 BUILT-IN SLOPE (0.50%) — 7- 0.5% TO OUTLET — DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS WILL BE 4" ROOF VENTS INJECTION "' � DETERMINED FOR EACH PARTICULAR •.:•. . . r d. . . : CASE MOLDED - :' •' ' '' ' -; .•. = '' ECONODRAIN INSTALLATION DETAIL PRE-CAST SEPARATORS ARE TO HAVE WT 45' BEND =~ ALL SPECIFIED HOLES EITHER CORE- ' SIDE SECTION VIEW :- PAVEMENT INJECTION BORED OR CAST IN PLACE, MOLDED WT INJECTION 45' WYE MOLDED WT _ 90' BEND -�,.:�� TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM ° EXTRA HEAVY C.I. INLET � NOTES: N.T.S. FROM WASH STAND OR of Q FLOOR DRAIN 1/8-LONG 1) CONCRETE: 4,000 PSI MIN. AFTER 28 DAYS. Q - BEND C.I. '= 2) ALL REINFORCEMENT PER ASTM C1227-93. �- T iv : . . C.I. TEE 3) TRENCH DRAINS SHALL BE ECONODRAIN TRENCH DRAIN SERIES #6 OR APPROVED EQUAL. i GASKETED 6" CHDPE PIPE (TYP) 'y: 4 BAR GRATE COVER PROVIDED BY ECONODRAIN TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL. A oo WATER UNE CONNECTION MIN. 1% SLOPE ) �°;. ROOF LEADER 5) SECURE THE TRENCH DRAIN STRUCTURES to prevent floating during concrete placement. _ CLEANOUT DETAIL Q:= r ° OUTLET TO N.T.S. SANITARY SEWER ALL INLET TRAPS TO BE ° PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE EXTRA HEAVY C.I. PIPE WITH 248 CMR 2.00 MIN. a • -t� • PROPOSED 8" TH. LOW PROPOSED 8" TH. LOW 8"POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE; SWALE PER PERMEABLE SWALE PER PERMEABLE ALUMINUM OR PLASTIC COATED d, 8"SOLID CONCRETE BLOCKS WITH WROUGHT IRON STEPS CAN BE FULL MORTARED JOINTS,HORZ. AND WHERE REQ'D SOIL WHERE REQ'D SOIL // USED. g" VERT., PLASTERED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. MIN. 3" DEEP MIN. 3" DEEP / 4'-0"t 17 / LOAM & SEED 4'-0"t 17 / ' WROUGHT IRON STEPS I / DISTURBED SLOPE. / PROVIDE EROSION PORTLAND CEMENT MORTAR USED :24 T I / CONTROL MIX & -24 T RETAINED SOIL / " SHALL CONSIST OF 1 PART CEMENT, RETAINED SOIL / SLOPE STABILIZATION _4----------------------- - - a _- _ r . 2 PARTS SAND. 24 M I // BLANKETS AS REQ'D. 24 M I / -' s ' : • ! .r' 9-'A • •' CEMENT BRICK,HOLLOW CONCRETE, OR CINDER BLOCK MASONRY MUST NOT BE =24 M I // 24 M I REINFORCED SOIL //LOAM & SEED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES USED. DISTURBED SLOPE. WALL I / __L_____________________.__ BASIN TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF BUILDING ALL OIL AND GASOLINE MUST BE REMOVED BEFORE I " WALL 12" DRAINAGE ZONE / PROVIDE EROSION WHERE POSSIBLE,COVER TO HAVE A CENTER HOLE. CLEANING OUT THE BASIN. AND MUST NOT BE / 12 DRAINAGE ZONE 1. 12" = 39 M HEIGHT -24 M CONTROL MIX & DISCHARGED INTO THE SEWER THROUGH OTHER FIXTURES. VARIES = I (3/4" CRUSHED I (3/4 CRUSHED STONE) -_ / VARIES __ _____ SLOPE STABILIZATION A TIGHT COVER MUST BE USED IF BASIN 12' I STONE I / IS LOCATED INSIDE OF BUILDING. SPECIFICATIONS FOR COVERING SPECIAL CASES OR (MAX. ) 3 6' 39 M / ) (MAX. 18 ) 3 6' 24 M I / BLANKETS AS REQ'D. CONDITIONS, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL / = -- ---------------------- / OPENING SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 24" DIA. AUTHORITIES, AND THE AUTHORITIES OF THE M.W.R.A. ADD LOW PERMEABLE SOIL TO I r— 1 6/20/12 RETAINING WALL DETAIL = 45 M I / 24 M GEOGRID DEPTH / THE CATCH BASIN SHALL BE SO LOCATED AND WROUGHT IRON STEPS SHALL BE SPACED ABOUT 18" \_APPROXIMATE LIMITS -'r----------------------` // CONSTRUCTED THAT SURFACE WATER SHALL BE EXCLUDED. APART. No., Date Description 45 M I OF EXCAVATION :24 M I INLET PIPE SHALL.BE AT LEAST FOUR ' BOTH VENTS SHALL BE EXTENED INDEPENDENTLY 18 Revisions I INCHES ABOVE NORMAL WATER LINE. ABOVE THE ROOF, OR AS APPROVED BY THE LOCAL 60 M I / '24 M I / WHERE SUBJECT TO FROST OR CRUSHING CONDITIONS, AUTHORITIES, AND THE AUTHORITIES OF THE M.W.R.A. / = ---------------------—/ OUTLET SHALL BE AT LEAST THREE FEET BELOW THE (Outlet pipe to be 45 degree angle) SURFACE. 60 B / DRAIN TILE 24 B (4" MIN) — DRAINTHE NEW CATCH BASIN MUST BE FILLED WITH CLEAN / TILE WATER BEFORE USING, AND AFTER BEING EMPTIED FOR (4" MIN) EMBED. EMBED. PERIODIC CLEANING. VARIES VARIES MDC TRAP Mq GEOGRID WALL ROBERT CRUSHED STONE GRAVITY WALL CRUSHED STONE N.T.S. N.T.S. o H. m LEVELING PAD N.T.S. LEVELING PAD GRIFFIN —+ CIVIL (MIN. 12" THICK) (MIN. 12" THICK) #36686 RETAINING WALLs�, TYPICAL SECTION N.T.S. NOTES: 1 ) TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN FOR PLANNING BOARD PERMITTING ONLY. DETAILED DESIGN PLANS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2) RECON SERIES 50 RETAINING WALL BY SHEA CONCRETE SPECIFIED. "D" OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY TEXTURE. 5 X "`� AV% 1w Ar 3) MINIMUM 10% WALL EMBEDMENT OR 6", WHICHEVER IS GREATER. ri 4) DRAIN TILE TO DAYLIGHT AT LOW POINTS, ENDS, AND MIN. 50 O.C. Engineering 0 � <:D 0 0 Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 2"x 2" HARDWOOD POST EROSION CONTROL FABRIC MIN. LENGTH OF 4' (MIRAFI NO. 100 OR EQQUAL). C-./ C-_/ C-__.� C-_/ C-_/ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G AT 6' MAX. O.C. STAPLE TO POST AT O" O.C. � � Beverly, MA 01915 VERTICALLY. PROPOSED CHINK VOIDS AND OUTFALL Tel., 978-927-5111 GROUT AROUND Fax: 978-927-5103 PROPOSED OUTFALL PIPE OUTFALL 2"x 2"x 30" MRM PROJECT 2.5 MIN 28„ HARDWOOD STAKES DIA. PER DIA. PER PLAN Q 5 X "D" MANAGEMENT, LLC IN EACH HAYBALE. DRIVE 6" TO 12" IN ` ;,�J��1��:� PLAN GROUND. SALEM, MA L 5 Min. i r i �. ,�:,' 6"f SLOPE - " 6" '����'�®'', %-`� J I , , I� 2%, MIN. EXTEND OUTFALL FLUSH W/ EXIST. 1.5' Min. EXCAVATE SHALLOW I , I t = 1.5 X Dw BLOCK WALL TRENCH BY HAND & I I� ;DESIGN ROCK C MATCH EXISTING 1Eo RIPRAP o o \� DETAILS III BACK FILL AFTER 1� STREAM BED 2» INSTALLING FABRIC BUTT GRADES TIGHTLY s TOGETHER SILT FENCE Ali YBALE D50 SIZE PLAN VIEW EROSION CONTROL SECTION VIEW RIP RAP=9" sGsaL% 1"=4V E N.T.S. OUTFALL DETAIL JQb No•: 700 C8a N.T.S. Fie-N-wc P/P/S/h-b — D�&- 12/20/11 a 24 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1) INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ALONG TOP OF BANK AND LIMIT OF ............................................................ ........................................................... ................... ..................................... ............................. WORK. MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND ADJUST DAILY AS .. .......... ..... ............................ ........................................................... .......... . . 22 ..................... ........ REQUIRED. 2) DECOMMISSION EXISTING SEWER PUMP STATION. REMOVE SEWER UTILITIES ............. ........................................................... ............................................................ ................... ........... .................... FROM EXISTING BRIDGE. ........................................................... ......................... .................. -------- 20.... ........................*---**.....*....*-----—---* : 3) REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE AND ABUTMENTS AND DISPOSE DECORATIVE: OFF-SITE ... ................. ......................... ...... LIGHT POSTS L ........ ........................................................... ................... ..................................... ............................. 4) STABILIZE EMBANKMENT WITH RIP RAP. ....................................... ... ............................ .....................................................18 ..................... ......... 5) INSTALL TEMPORARY SHEET PILING COFFERDAMS AT PROPOSED ABUTMENTS. 6) STABILIZE EXPOSED BANK AND BASE OF WALL WITH RIP RAP SCOUR ..................................... ..................... ......................... ............................... ........................................................... ........................................................... ........................................................... ................... .................... ........... ............................. PROTECTION. 16 ................................ ------- .............. 42 HIGH GUARD S.E.S.D. SEWER EASEMENT 7) EXCAVATE TO PROPOSED FOOTING GRADE. ESTABLISH DEWATERING SYSTEM. 8) INSTALL FOOTING PILING SUPPORTS. ...................................... ..................... ................... ......................... ...................................... .. ... .. ....................... .................... ................... ............ ............................. 14 ............................ ...... ....... 9) FORM & POUR PILE CAP. ------ ..... ..... ..... .1- 10) FORM & POUR ABUTMENT WALLS. F F 1 11) REMOVE SHEET PILING AND FINISH INSTALLING RIP RAP. .......................... ............. -------- -------------- ........ ............................. 12 ...................................... ------- 12) INSTALL PROPOSED STEEL I-BEAM BRIDGE GIRDERS. xl-,64 100—YR FLOOD I— I — 11 11 GRADE bU—Tt< FLUW-. 13) FORM AND POUR CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK. ELEV. 10.8 .............................................. T ....................... ........................................................... 10 ................................... .............. ............ ...W/.f41.AdK.1&2.ONL.y........................ 14) CONSTRUCT BRIDGE CURBING, SIDEWALK & GUARDS. 0—YR FLOOD ELM 9.16 = 15) INSTALL ELECTRICAL CONDUITS AND BRIDGE LIGHTING. w ELEV 0-95 16) FINE GRADE APPROACH RAMPS AND INSTALL BINDER COURSE. ... ... ... ................................. ......... ......................... ... ........ .... 8 •................................................ -------- IW�OF*EXIST..................... -FLOOD............. . .... .... ...................................... 17) INSTALL APPROACH CURBING AND SIDEWALK. BOTTOM OF /--�--E�-ISTINQ EXISTING W/ PHASE 3 WIDENING BOTTOM OF COMPOSITE 4" TH. "RIDGE '—BEAMS 5z ELEV. 7.1 ELEV. 7.09 STEEL I ..::BEAM GRADE 18) LOAM AND SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS. GRADE �STEEL I-BEAM COMPOSITE DECK & 14"± ... ........ELEV_8.65�........ ......I....................... ............................. 19) INSTALL FINISH PAVEMENT COURSE. ............. ..................................... ..................... ................ .. ........ ................ ----------- 6 ........................................... ELEV. W65i ...DEEP...''***....ST'*E"E"'L----I 'M'-------:*"*"*...... ...... ....... .......*.....: ARMOR PROFiOSED 20) REMOVE EROSION CONTROLS AFTER ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABLE. V: MHW ELEV. 5.0 ARMOR PROPOSED REMOVE DESLOPES ALONG SIDESLOPES ALONG PROP. FINISH PROR'. FINISH ..... ............. ................ ................................ ....... ..................... EXTSTING................. ........... ..............S.01L.AS..... ............ ... ..... SWI N_GWAH S.A..BASE................. ............. 4 --- WTNGWALLS--&--i3ASE--- --- -------- 'RIVER'-90 I'VER' RIVER BED NECESSARY OF ABUTMENT WITH 10% SLOPE OF ABUTMENT:WITH 10% SLOPE 11 (APPROX.) RIP RAP (D50=9") RIP RAP (D50=9-) 2 . .. ................................. .. ................. ........................................................... .................... ........ ..... .... .............. ............... ..................................................... ........ ......N -------------------------------- ............................. S.CS.D. 38.0' CLEAR SPAN CONCRETE 78" R.C. ABUTMENT : ................. 'OSED LONG 13ASE .. ...... WITH . ............... ..................................................................... .................. ............................ GE . .......................................................... ...... 0 .. .......... ........... .. ............... ..(N-CLIt---EXIST....BRID. - -JS--29-,0'±-).- ..................... ................. ........... SEKIR (TYP) CONCRETE: . FOOTING OR . ... ............ ........................................................... ......... .................. ...................................................... .... ........................................................... .................................................TIN... .... ..................... ............................. —2 PILE CAP (TBD) —4 BRIDGE CROSS— SECTION SCALE: 1"=4' NOTE 1) 50-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATIONS FROM METCALF & EDDY, JULY 18, 2008 LETTER ENTITLED "SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM (ENIF) FOR FLOOD MITIGATION FACILITIES FOR THE PEABODY AREA-. REPORT INDICATES THAT THE 2006 "MOTHERS DAY STORM" WAS A 50-YEAR STORM EVENT. 2) BRIDGE DESIGN IS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL STRUCTURAL, GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDRAULIC EVALUATION. 3) BRIDGE DESIGN TO IMPROVE HYDRAULIC CONSTRICTION CREATED BY EXISTING BRIDGE CROSSING THE NORTH RIVER. 1 6 20 12 WIDEN BRIDGE ADD CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE PLAN No., Date Description Revisions ROBERT H. C/I M GRIFFIN CIVIL #36686 ri G Engineenng Group, LLC P.0 Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 Tel. 978-927-5111 Fax: 978-927-5103 MRM PROJECT M AN AGEM EN T, LLC SALEM, MA O DETAILS IV SuLp.- 1w=40' J&&.- 700 C- 9 Fie Nana p/p/s/h-b D 12/20/11 I AD - Q` o\/E GR - ' � M oN 'o �� � A� 5 MAP 16 LOT 377 i STONE RETAINING 23 HFR N/F MIAP 1 N LAT 238 \ C53 / waLLs w1rH SIGN 23 HBP HARMONY GROVE � 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC ' 35 BP AWN I 3 Po COR LAND COURT PLAN 33813A 35 HFR 11 HE5 OR TH RI VER CANAL TIDAL O 6 CK WITH 6 H£ t N � � R�Cr � 25 HE ����J~':... 6 HPG AT IZACH TSU___ 25 HPG RIPRAP AREAS UJ to P 4 PA I 3P \ � � � 11 RBN 1 VT \ �� ` 6 VT i 1 TO i LAWN t 3 PO 3 MSv _ _ ^�° 3 TO - 1 PO 6 LOT 378 40 dEv AUTHORITY __ ��— -- -- — 1 POG 10 dM R.R. TRACKS j N/F 3 PO BAY Bp HES I POA TRANSPOR TA TION I )NY GROVE -- 25 AEy 8 H£S 10 SJS 8 HE5 0 AM 16 GH 1 51 CORP. --`-'` 20 HFR I0 AM - - - SNOW STORAGE \ o z s. 5 PN 10 HPG P R.R. RACKS 6 TO �� 3 MSV 1 BN \ z TS :.i - --_ 10 WIDE PATH _ r � EXIST.30" HONEY / - \ -EXIST. 10" DIA \ a � Ir- CHUSET i y . 85 HR LOCUST TO REMAIN EXISTING LINDEN TO z o \ 20 HBP OFFICE 20 H LOCAREMAT NSP 2 \ < a VT 1 POC SNOW STORAGE 5 FN II AM 31 A£V 13 HE 43 AM tj z w f 3 SP SNOW STORAGE 5 SI 1 PO I POA 4 ,GT 13 HPG 3 PO BUILDING C0 � 3 NCS I I1V 3 AL 6 M5V VT 5 HGE I AL 2 HE5 \ ZO O i 3 HPG 10 RA ~-- 13 EC 8 SJS 6 HE 2 GK I TO • F- z ` I i Sig 3 51 6 HPG 23 HBP 6 Hg 4 AL 3 PO 56 HFR U v o t I Sig I TO 5 Sig ;, (� 1 "-~ ` 23 HOA 6 HPG \ O 0 3 PN I ® 3 PN 3 GT �- 6 MSv BENCH,TYP. 4 HE � � � � 05 I 1 TO 4 85G 13 Sig 1 RA 1 RA --� 6 HE 8 SJs 13 EC 5 CN EXISTING 24" DIA w W_ z w o 1 I 4 MSv 12 LFC 2 RA 8 LFG 10 L.FG -6 HPG 2 12 AM 6 MSv -- \ a 4 M5v 4 LFC I 1 TO 3 RBN PROPOSED BUILDING #1 3 HES SNOW 1 PO ReN 13 CH 23 HOA 13 EC 53 A1=v 1 AL LINDEN TREE TO O 3 CoLu 20 H£ 5 CH 1-REMAIN X F- w � x 5 TO I TO 1:SJ5 6 VT W GARAGE UNDER STORAGE 3 RBN IPO -� 20 H 4 '�"6 MSV 15 MSV r r • 1- 1- W co 1- �j 1- p I POA. 1 POC 1 RA 12 LFG IRA 6 H -� 3 GT �" U 12 CH / t ) 10 LFG 'i CH 11014 13 EC 10 HE5 w w w > w w LL z 1 515 � 3 PN 47—UNITS i POG I POA f 6 HPG 3 PN f ��_r -1 _1 C' d ..J � -1 z Q ` SNOW STORAGE GRG=13.0 8 LFC I POA PROP 4 RBN 3 PN 40 AEv -~. 26 NBP -r 1 U U w U) U - U o Y 3 BN 13 HSP 1 RBN QSED Il CH ~~ �� r - W W c~n w W 0 W FT 9 LIMITS OF� 3 PO 1 VT 2 My FF=23.0 3 {.IES 1 POB I,y� GA BUILDING #2 w CLEARING RE AIMING SNOW STORAGE 4 HES' I RBN 6 HGE 6 HGE l RSN i RBN 3 LFG RAGE UNDER 3 RBN 5 RBN — n �- °- d Cr a. 0 a- 8 1 ON WALL, TYP. 3 HES 1 BSG 6 HPG 6 HPG 15 BSG 1 HE5 10 BSG �47--UN17S 3 CK I PN 11 CH �` N `\ / 26 HFR 0 0 3 0 u- 0 a 15 SP I 5 RSN 4 PP A I RON 3 HE5 1 RBN 2 My 3 RBN 1 RA RB to cn ❑ ❑ m w U) D z 4 PO 5 RBN a ' 6 HGE 1 RBN 12 LFG 1 Rp w w D 5PJ RR I n " 6 HPG 6 HGE 8 LFG it CH :: \ 1-- 10' WIDE PATH W W O C W W H N 3 PN I 6 HPG 23 BSG PRQp 5 RBN 30 WR ac d d W w X o7 � � 35 WR L,q a I RBN I POC QSED BUIL 3 Gt L W 1 GT 3 GT a 13 BSG 3 HES 1 RBN W� GA LDING #3 �® \ 30 HBP j 36 VT b5 HE/ 10 LFC RAGE U 361 1 AF '— ,.:. 3 BN : HPG/ (47-UNITS) LAWN f N N T T 0 ~ 1 5 PA 3 HES NDER 3 PN T r .- uai 3 IFN SNOW STORAGE GT NGE 10 BSG 1 RBN 6 HG£ 4 TO 25 CH o o rn in o 2- Fw 14 LFC N . I TO � � iZ4—_Q o Q j 5 ll Sig 3 GT 6HPG 2 MV I RBN I My 915 SG CID d Lu x i 6 RBN "1 ISI . .. . 16 LOT 217 1 PP 3 PA 1 POB 1 RBN 13 BSG I RBN 1 , 3 HEWS 24 VT LAWN o a 3 HES 1 BN _ SA KES 16 SP 32 RR 20 RBN I AL 2 R8N 1 POB 3 � 8 PA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O 0 ❑ •• o = 3 PO 30.515 1 HBM 5 RBN ~ w #' 21 RR 14 VT 1 GT 3 HES (D CD 0 0 (D (9 C7 >- z p 13 SJS 3 PO 15 LFC 6 SNOW MAP 16 LOT 218 I Po 6 RA 20 vT STORAGE RBN AWN 3 HES O _3 o 5 MSV 6 BN 12 RBN 1 BN 6HPCs (LAUN) CH SIL VER N/F .11 PF .�.. .� ._.. 35 RR 18 SP SP ...� 6 PN ~ 11 AF --` FLORES — — — -- — -- • 1 515 '� �\ (SNOW LAWN z c� u. w o U m w — — — MAPI 16 LOT 376 — MAP 16 ' MAP 16 .I ° ° LIMITS of ` N -~I N/F CLEARING LOT 224 LOT 225 -- sH SHE ® C� d � Q N F MAP 16 28 FLORES 16 SP 6 VT S AF 5 AF 7 PP 5 MAP 16 I CONLEY I TUCKER I I LOT 227 # I — — — — — 4 Pa ( / I LOT 223 I I - 1 N/F MAP 16 LOT 230 x a-=� o PN ,�} AP g PP 1+j ~ 4 HES sZ' _X •• -f o I I#2 N/F I I LAWSO)N I N/F " ❑ _ ���� MAP 16 / 3 POA 8 RBN MAP 16 LOT 222 A&N REAL DEMEULE �x LIMITS OF MAP 16 #2 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 232 CLEARING: MAP 16 '��� 0 o LOT 220 N/F TRUST �— I ( LOT 231 I p N/F I° ( OT 234 LOAN F 0 LOT 235 / fn 0 m o IF v U N/F ; KOHLOFER 10 MAP 16 L / / I BLANDEN MAP 16 LOT 229 Q N/F I MYERS I o # N/F — n N I I 44 I' ( I I N/F I I I ROSS#2G �� ---\ I MAP 16 MCSWIGGIN PATTISON PATTIS 'U W z l 8 # I I I ( BASH I #24 1 LOT 233 6 I 30 #14 - # u u 2 R �°, w [f) N N #40 #38 #36 # Lmlme is i SPERIDAKOS _ ° o '3 v 2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKE �-- v BEA \/-FR STREET 2x2x4' CROSS MEMBER O J K Q) w 16"+- �.�.( W rn fi u- lV v GRAPHIC SCALE 2-2�/2 DRYWALL SCREWS, M � - I z TYP. 0 - o I- � ,b o U0) ao 0 20 ao eo iao TREE REMOVE ALL LABELS, a o` 2 0 r 11,1� TAGS OR OTHER FOREIGN W � ALT. Tfi�EE STAKING PLAN VIIII/ / MATERIAL FROM LIMBS � n. LANDSGAEE NOTES • ( IN FEET � NOT TO SCALE 1. PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLANT LISTS ARE FOR CONVEMENCE t0 TH CONTRACTOR ONLY. THE 1 'inch = 40 ft. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL 1N5T',ALLATION 5 SHOWN ON PLANS. PRUNE OR PINCH BACK CANDLE w \\ %j GROWTH 1/3, 2. SIZE AND GRADING STANDARDS OF PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM T THE LATEST EDITION OF ,1l jjI`� / MAINTAIN FORM, DO > "U.S.A. STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, BY THE AMERICAN,AS SOCIdtION NURS>=RYMEN, INC. i�l ANT L-155 REMOVE ALL LABELS, ��V(1�U`� NOT PRUNE LEADER 0 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE FROM INSECTS AND DISEASE. I +- TAGS OR OTHER FOREIGN { ��1 VI I �' �f KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE MATERIAL FROM LIMBS \4'l�` 1 CINCH TIE TREE 4. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTABLE H ICULTURAL PRACTICES. AEv 195 A5TILBE JAPONICA 'ELISAB>;TH VAN VEEN' ELISABETH VAN 1/l=EN A5TILBE N0.2 CONI � THIS 15 TO INCLUDE PROPER PLANTING MIX,PLANT BED AND TREE PIT PREPARATION, PRUNING, AF 42 ABIES FRASERI FRASER FIR ro-1' HGT. V1�111 �i`{ �1 1+( /MI6/r NOSE STAKING OR GUYING, WRAPPING, SPRAYING,FERTILIZATION, PLANTING AND I DEQUATE MAINTENANCE AL 16 AMELAMCHIER CANADENSIS LAMARKII LAMARKI SERVIGEBERRY 8-IPJ CLUMP (LIMB UP) �l` I! y II z UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER AM 96 ARONIA MELANOCARPA AUTUMN MAGIC AUTUMN MAGIC CHOK£BERRY 24 -36 tV�frf �I�II ���il'ff O BN i4 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH 12'-14' CLUMP 2"x2" wOOD ��1��I IIP J II���!/� BSG 95 BUXU5 SEMPERVIRENS X 'GREEN MOUND' GREEN MOUND BOXWOOD 24"-30" PRUNE 1/3 FOLLOWING STAKE AT ANGLE Vd/ 5. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF.ONE YEAR�Y THE CONTRACTOR AND � � � � E ` ` + d��J �/I DO NOT MULCH A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS THEREAFTER BY THE OWNER FROM DATE OF INSTALLATION. DURING TN CH 181 CLETHRA ANIFOLIA HUMMING BIRD HUMMINGBIRD SUMMER5WEET 2-3 HGT. �'�-PLANTING TOWARDS PREVAILING VI��Yl I J�I 1 z R E r' DIRECTLY CTLY A,GA WST ii 1 1�► /�llll�f� , W ONE YEAR GUARANTEE PERIOD, DEAD PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REPL.4GED AT NO C057 70 THE CK 13 CORNUS KOUSA 'CHINENSIS' CHINESE DOGWOOD 2-212" GAL. WIND (, ! ` IJ�l�ji1 ll / ����1f�I TRUNK Q OU,NER. AT THE END OF THE ONE EC 52 �(I�lll�ll� I ACCEPTANCE FROM TH OWNER YEAR PERIOD,THE CONTRACTOR SHALLOBTAIN FINAL GT 24 GLEDT5IA TRIACANTHOS'VAR INERMIS 'SKYLINE' SKYLINEAHONEYLOCUSTT 4" CAL NT / SLOW RELEASE �d 1 / , HBP 110 HEMEROCALLIS 'BUTTERED POPCORN' BUTTERED POPCORN DAYLILY NO.2 CONT FERTILIZER PACKET ' ��� 4" BARK MULCH (,LJ > 6. ALL GRASS, OTHER VEGETATION AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM LL PLANTING AREAS HE 143 N05TA 'ELEGANS' ELEGANS 140STA NO.2 CONT 6-8" DEPTH EARTH SAUCER ~ 0 O PRIOR TO PLANTING. HE$ 101 HYDRANGEA MACROPHYLLA 'ENDLESS SUMMER' ENDLESS SUMMER HYDRANGEA 24"-30" 4" BARK MULCH 3 PACKETS REQUIRED Q Q HFR 310 HEMEROCALLIS 'FRAGRENT RETURNS' FRAGRENT RETURNS DAYLILY NO. 1 CONT FIINI5P GRADE z } 1. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED WILL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE HGR 99 WOSTA GREAT EXPECTATIONS GREAT EXPECTATIONS NOSTA NO.2 CONT DO NOT MULCH EARTH SAUCER I"• z THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR HOA 46 HEMEROCALLIS 'ON AND ON' ON AND ON DAYLILY NO. 1 CONT DIRECTLY AGAINST x �- 1TI=— EXISTING SOIL z Q O ' HPG 2013 HOSTA 'PIEDMONT GOLD' PIEDMONT GOLD HOSTA NO.2 CONT. BRANCHES -I I I - I ":;' I ¢ � Q 8. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED OF THE PRESENCE OP THE UN E}�SROUND UTILITIES AND LFG 126 LEUCOTHOE FONTANESANA 'COMPACTA' COMPACT LEUCOTHOE NO.3 CONT FINISH GRADE 7v -%t; :,.,,• REMOVE ALL Q SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF SAME BEFORE COMMEN ING AND DIGGING MSV 58 MISCANTHUS 51NIEN515 'COSMOPOLITAN' SILVER GRA55 N0.2 CONI - - I I I - -- - I _ 'y'�._ y; I�I777�- METAL OR ROPE -J z OPERATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAID UTILITIES, PAVING, My 9 MAGNOLIA VIRGININA SWEETBAY MAGNOLIA 8'-10' HGT I ll=I�I=-I I =III=1I I�!I I�—EXISTING SOIL ALT. TREE STAKING. �� r �!T BINDINGS t U}R4P r� WALKS, CURBING, ETC. DAMAGED IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS JOB AT NO d DITIONAL COST TO THI= PA 19 PRUNUS ACCOLADE ACCOLADE.CHERRY 2"-2��2" CAL. =I I =I I I - _ - II I I I III-III TI FROM TOP 1/3 U - - REMOVE ALL METAL OR t2)21i2" I( I I of ROOT BALL L11 u1 W w OWNER PN 12 PINUS NIGRA AUSTRIAN PINE 5�-10 HGT, ,III-1 I - _ ROPE BINDINGS t WRAP DRYWALL SCREWS �I II I I Q > --) w 0 PO 34 PICEA OMORIKA SERBIAN SPRUCE 61-11 HGT .I I _ I-I �- I j� ( W _ —III FROM TOP I/3 OF ROOT 2"x2"x4' WOOD ' - � Mal � —Tj=i'� 12 MIN.WITH Q � � O � z S. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3" CLEAN SHREDDED DARK ROWAN BARK MULCH. POA 8 PICEA OMORIKA SERBIAN SPRUCE 10'-12' HG7 I I_I I I=I I I�I� I I-I I I- B" MIN.WI MIXTURE � z CL POB 3 PICEA OMORIKA SERBIAN SPRUCE 12'-14' HGT -'.' "l BALL CRO55 MEMBER (�. O (� > U 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 4" LOAM FOR ALL AREAS TO BE SOD ED OR SEEDED. POG 5 PICEA OMORIKA SERBIAN SPRUCE 14'-16' HGt SLOW RELEASE AS SPECIFIED �� FERTILIZER PACKET 2x2 x4 WOOD STAKE Z d Q. O PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 12 ROLLED THICKNESS OF LOAM. THE ANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PP 39 PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE 6 1 HGT. „ WITH LONG TAPER MIN. 18" O < Z o SHALL COORDINATE SUBGRADE PREPARATION WITH THE GENERAL CONT CTOR PRIOR TO RA 24 RHODODENDRON AGLO AGLO RHODODENDRON 2411-30112 PACKETS REQUIRED 6 MIN.WITH D Q PLACING LOAM. RBN 126 RHODODENDRON 'BOULE DE NEIGE' BOULE DE NEIGE RHODODENDRON 24"-30" BACKFILL MIXTURE NOTES: z (D z RR 144• ROSA VIRGINIANA VIRGINIA ROSE 2'-3' As SPECIFIED INSTALL STAKES AND GUYS TO TREES IF THE FOLLOWING APPLY: Q � W = _j & � cfl w � d 0 Q Q M II. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, INCLUDING PLANT LOCATION, SELECTION, SIZE, 51 13 SYRINGA R>='CICULATA IVORY SILK IVORY SILK TREE LILAC 2"-2112- GAL. 1.THE TREE I5 OF SUBSTANTIAL SIZE. ._1 O -1 C'n c4 u G co U) QUANTITY OR CONDITION SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE O R AND LANDSCAPE Sig 119 SPIRAEA JAPONICA '5HOORI' SHIBORI SPIRAEA 24"-36" T'1 1" t^� OI I t� L7 t� I C t I 1 i S� 2.THE PLANTING LOCATION 15 EXTREMELY WINDY, AS ON OPEN UNDEVELOPED SITES. ►¢- ARCHITECT LAND MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, IF APPLICABLE)PRIOR TO INSTA CATION ON SITE. 5P 119 SYRINGA PAtULA 'MISS KIM' MISS KIM LILAC 3'-4' HGT. 1/ l� !� l.F 1� 1� 1�t 5HRUB l.Il 3.THE PLANTING LOCATION 15 COMPRISED OF SAND OR OTHER LOOSE TEXTURED SOILS. I TO 31 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'SMARAGD' EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE 6'-1' HGT. 4. IF STAKES AND GUYS ARE REQUIRED, REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR TIME. DATE SCALE C' 12. WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN, PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE FOR PERENNIAL AN ANNUAL FLOUTER BED VT 14'1 VIBURNUM TOMENT05UM 'MARIESI' MARIES VIBURNUM 24"-36" NOT TO SCALEAREAS SHALL CONSIST OF OOUR I I 3 PART HORTICULTURAL PERLITE BY VOLUME.TS SPEAT M085 MAY BEPARTS SUBSTIT TED WI H WENum r EAT MOSS, LL-ROTTED DEC IDUOU& TREES UNDER 8' IN N CALIPER 8/11/11 1" =4Q' OR DEHYDRATED MANURE OR COMPOST.ROTOTILL BEDS TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES. YE I\ 1� E� TREE& 1'-0" IN HEIGHT t UNDER Co NOT TO SCALE SHEET 1 OF 1 •.l 1. REVISIONS � _ - - o Ll REV #i DATE BY: _ Q LL ROAD 1 1 O/ 1 4/ 1 1 J . P . RQvE _ CL l� U N.� GN 5O, W,pE) - _ � � � X � r- 1 EXIST. I� R MON WAY - - ._ Z 4/ 12/ 12 J . P . CURB CU N A (PI \ ❑ �- � � �, � 25' WIDE SB/DH � = I W SEWER (HLD LINE) 0 I" W EASEMENT z Q� G +0.5 ` / ❑ Ul u J / - IMAP16LOT 377 \ 3 N/F SB/DH \ . R +o 0 6 ' / / / HARMONY GROVE FNID & HLD CORP. '- / i0.s 1 6 1\3 / MAP 16 ILOT 238 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC �- ❑ 3 a +U.6 `z. = .5 NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL LAND COURT IPLAN 33813A LL o .5 EA \ � BRIDGE W/ 8PIPEG DECK= EL. 9.1t �� �0 1.0 i. i. b.a < - � ...• EXISTING CROSSING 0.7 's 1.7 .7 1.1 S� / EASEMENT EXISTING J +o. i s 2.z BRIDGE L _ --VAP 16 LOT 378 ABUTMENTS y N/ + + ♦ r 10. r + + ♦ + + + • + + + o. o.o o.o o b.o b.0 0.0 0 0.o a.o b.1 .2 a.s 1. 2.3 0.5 0.2 b.l b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o b.o b.o b.o o.o o.o b.0 b.o 0.0 0.0 b.o b.o O.o 0.0 b.0 0.0 O.o b. b.o 0.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 0.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 0.10 0.0 +0.0 0.0 b.0 0.0 b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.0 b.o o CORP b.o b.0 b.0 0.0 HARMON �ROV� - �- - _\�� J - - - - - - - - _ 0 1 0.1 o.l b.l a_ c -e -?.T-I!_0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3 0. 1 9 *l.a o.7 0.3 0.l b.l b.l 8A YO-1 b.l o.l 0.1 0.1 b.l b.l b.l b.l b.o o.o b.o o.o b.o b.o b.o b.o 0.0 `0.0 0.o T---0--i:0: b.o 0.o b.0 b.0 `0.0 +0.° b.0 b.�0 0.0 0.0 `0.1 0.1 0.0 '0.0 0.1 0.1 b.l .0 0.1 .0 0 b.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 �,� + ##,, + RAC S TOR1 .1 + j IH TRANSPORTATION R.R. TRACKS AUTHORITY 4-j J 0.0 0.0 T 1 b.3 0.3 b.2 0.1 1. SSA CH�SE T I + ♦ - - -,-._-. -� �- -�- - - - - - = w!Mill it 0.° t..� I' ll I0.5 b.2 ��0.�- �9' 1 0.2 b.2 b.3 0.5 0.8 X1.0 .6' 1.7 1.8 1.3 1.0-�.0 1�IK�.�j 5 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.8 1.2-1�8�+0 1- b.2 �� 0.1 b. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 +0.0 b.0 0. 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 b.2 0.2 b.2 0.3 1.4 1.8 t1.2 1.4 1.5 2.2 X1.7 1.4 2.2 1.9 A61 2 0.1 0.0 cima w .1 0.2 b.5 2 0.5 0.5 +0.5 +0.7 b.8 0.8 0.8 b.9- . - - - 2.8 +2.0 b.9 �Q 5 0. 1 b.l b.0 b.0 +0.0 0.0 b.0 `0.0 0.0 +0.0 b.1 +0.2 0.3 b.5 b.8 0.6 0.5 .4 0.3 0.3 3 +2.1 + `4 4 2.3 4 0.2 \.1 � y�♦ - - \ U EL 0.1 0.4 1.2 .1 2.1 0.8 b.3 b.2 b.4 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.0 1.2 1.0 0.8 b.9 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.x_8 1.9 1.1 1.3\.8 4 b.1 0.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 0.0E b. b. 0.6 1.5 1.8 1.9 .2 +0.8 0.6 .1 b.7 6 b.5 b\` O z:r +0.2 +0.6 +2.1 +3 8 2.6 1.0 0.3 0.9 1.0 +2.4 +4 b.8 +2. 0.9 +0. 0.7 b.4 0.5 0.9 b.8 b.8 b.6 b.6 +0.6 +0.7 +0.8 +0.7 b.7 1.2 + + + + GRANT T E + + + + 2.2 2.3 2.2 1.7d b.6 b.8 b.l 1BL9 b.0 0.0 b.0 b.0 b.l 0.2 .7 1. 3. 1.5 0.7 0. EXISTING 1.7 b.8 1.0 0.2BIKEP =ET, wAL N OFFICE0.2 b.6 t .1 4 tA +0.9 b.1 +0.4 1.1 #3.1 l b.8 +2.7 1, 0.7 +0. b.3 b.2 1.? 4.0 2.7 t3.7 `2.3 #3,3 `2.4 1 0X1.5 A11 0.3 � 0.3 1 b 1 b.l 0.7' �D� 1 + 2 1.3 +0.6 0. BUDDINGr_ __ llIllkil,EL. 9,6fI lj� 1. 0.4 1.3 0.3 0.1\ T- PROPOSED BUILDING #1 � V R 0.2 b.6 2. +4 9 +2.4 1.0 0 b.3 0.4 0.9 1.9 +2.6 +2.4 1.6 1. 0.8 +0.7 + 9 1 2.0 4. 0.2 t3.4 2.8 1.7 2.52 9 0.4 0.4 �2 b.2 .3 0.4 b.3�0: .}� +0.0 +0.0 b. R 0.� 3 0.2 b.2 b.4 1.5 +3. 3 0.2 0.1 + r -- t 3 ANTE BLOC ` T- W/ GARAGE UNDER - + + + + r + + + + + + + + + + (47-UNITS) - 12. - K 0.1 0.4 1.4 8 2.4 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0. 2 1 1. PROP +2,8 X3.2 X3.3 1.8 1.7 0.7--0 9��.9+0 4 0 5�i.5=3 b.7. `0.1 +0.0 0.0 b.0 b.0 0.1 A �!L9 0 1.3 1.6 4.2 0.1 0 0 + + + + + + OSED BUI � � GR p VV EL. _ -- ' .•.� 0.1 0.3 b.6 .1 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0 5 1.1 7 1.1 0. 1.9 4 W/ GAR LD/NG #2 1.2 +0.7 1.5 1.8 1.7 2.4 +2.6�tt.4�.7 1.0�6-1..2 0.2AN�r ii(,® k0 .1 b.2 0.3 0.6 0.69�of7 b.' 1 0.1 _+0.0 (47`UNITUNDER BIKE ATIO _ C WALL _- +0.1 0.2 t. b.6 + + 3 1.0 +2. 1.8 t. n n +2.3 2.3 16. S) 1.5 +0.9 +0.7 +3.4 +4.4 +2.6 +3.5 +2.5 1.�1.9_�1.`,4L`p-94.6-t- +0.0 4 0.3 `0.1 0j.0- 0= 0 0.0` _ _ r ♦ r + + + + + '2. + + 10. '0. • + ♦ • 94.6E [�] « + + ♦ +0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.l b.3 0.8 +3.3 2.9 1.3 0.4 b.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0. 5 4 t5.9 t .3 2 i -- .5 1.7 � 2.7 2.6 �.8 b.2 ��2 =1 0:0 b.0 0 to n o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 .aSTONE � W RET AL 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.2 +0.5 1.5 1.9 1.9 .1 +0.8 + 0.5 0.5 +0.5 0.3 +0.2 +0.2 b.3 0.2 b.2 0.1 b.4 0.8 1.2 +0.9 0.1 0.1 0 + t.0 6.3 1. 1.2 b. PROP .o �1AP a6 `d-9T +02b7 `o.o +o.o O.o 0 0 0.0 +o.o W PROPOSED BUILD + .3 b.l b.9 b.2 0.1 b.1 0 1 moo = 0.0 b.o b. N/F / GARAGE TNG #3 , ❑ 0.1 0.2 0.6 +0.9 1.1 + 0 ;2.0 `2.�1.2 1.1 0 6 05`0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.-5-- + 0.8 +0.5 b.3 b 1 + + + r E 0.2 + 0.2 b.2 b.l b.l 1 U + A + r + + ♦ + ♦ ♦ + 2 S + .0 1.6 6 2 /V o� �� o.o o.o o.o o.o o � 4 _ DE 1.3 .2 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 0.0 0.o b.o b.o .o b.a 7 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o ( R U O I ♦ + + + + 12. + + + + + NI TS) ` ` 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.9 4.2 2.0 1.3 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 .1 + 1.1 0.6 0 5-4- +0.5 X1.9 0.3 +0.2 +0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 + 1.9\t-3, .1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 + .1 0.0 +0.0 +.LSO 10.$610.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � \ +0.1 +0.2 b.4 0.7 1.1 + + + + * r * 0 1.5 1.0 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.6 0. �, b.7 b.9 0,9 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.2 +0.9 0.3 b.2 0. 2 v 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 b.3 b.5 b.3 0. 0 2 0.1 0.0 �/ VER - o.o 'o.o +o.o +o o +o.o +o.o o.o +o.o M�4P 1�.�O�,o21t�.0 +0 1 (PUBLIC WAY N/F + + + + + + + +1 + + *2 + + + + ❑ 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.5 2.2 2.9 1.6 1.1 1.2 2.3 2,5 2.1 1.2 1.1 1. 1.9 1.1 1.8 1.3 1.1 9 1.3 1.4 1 1 1.6 1.1 1. + 0.6 +0.8 0.5 +0.7 0.5 0.4 1. b.9 1.2 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.7 0.5 b.1 +0.0 n n b-0 -0.0 ^ 0.0_ 1-0 0.0 0. ° FLbO�E� 0 0.0 _ _ 2 � MAP 16 LOT 376 -J+-00 - _ T.6- � �1 `I r� +0.9 1.9 2.5 1.6 1.1 1. 1.4 1.1 1.4 +2.1 .9 +1.2 1.6 1-3 1.7 1.2 1.6 b.9 1.0 1.5 1.2 1.4 --- 1.2 1 1 1.9 2.3 X3.0 1.4 b.7 b.4 0. b.l +0.0 `0.0 0.0 +0.0 `0.0 0.0 +0.0 O.�+0.0 +0.0 +0 N/ro.0 +0.0 +0. cbgOTE .0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 +0.0 . +0.0 t.0 b.M AIB.01 6 b.0 0.0 t.0 +0.0 0.0-0 .0 - - I FLORES J LOT 225 - ° ° • I I p� ftj +.8 0.8 4.2 +2.1 1.9 1.3 1.2 .9 + + r + + ♦ + + r ♦ + + + + + + + ` r 2.6 .1 1.4 b.7 b b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o o.o o.o o.o ° o o.o o.o o.d o O.o O.o O.o b.o b.o Il b. b.o b. b.o b.o b. b.o� b.o ° - iv�A �6 TUCKER MAP 16 # SHED SHED[M Q] �. + *0. *0. + *0. + + + - + 2 + + + + I LOT 223+ 1 + + + I + I I OT 2-27 +0.9 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.7 +2.5 +2.7 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.6 +2.1 2.3 1.2 0.8 o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 b.o ���ro o.MAPo160 b °Il 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o b.o b.i b.0 b.0 0161„ b. b,0 t-0 0.0 10.0 - - - - FISH - W MAP 16 LOT 222 A&N REAL I LAWSON I POND X --�___° . . + + + ♦ • ♦ • + ♦ + ,,p. ♦ + + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ *0 + + ♦ + + + + ♦ + + ♦ + + • W o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o. o.o o.tvOTo.2201.0 0.0 o.o �1„p o 0 ohSTATE o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o. .o b. 0.0 0.o 1.0 o.o t.0 b.o RAS 0.0 0.0 b.0 b.o 0.0 b.0 O.o o. o.o b.o b.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • N/F v /r TRUST x GARDE - 0 3�8 8 WALL 0' °' 'r - lb. a« KOHL OFEF , , IAP +16 + + � 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.d 0.0 0.01 o.o I3LANDEM.o o� .o oro o.o o.o 0.0 LcbT 2 4 0. 0.0 0.0 0 0 T .o b 0 0.0 b.0 0.0 b.0 b'.o O.o �.a i1�P � L `I° 2 0 b'RilAf '0i6b.o 0.0 + b.0 0.0 0.0 b.0 b.0 .0-- b.0 ` .o +0.01 0 b.0 0.0 .0 .0 +0.0 0.0 +0 6�L�b.o O.o '0.0 I I #44 I N F I Q MAP 16 LOT 229 Q I / 1 LOT 231 ° MAP 16 SOT 32 SIT ��- PSG + + + + + 2+ « `o.o +o. + .�8 0 +o.o +o.o 'o. o +o.o +o. `d.o +o.0 0.0 +o.� C�L�,� +010 b.o b.o +ol.o 'b�0 bl.o b.o b.o b.o b .0 0.01 1 b.o �E�L� o.q b.o N � +0.0 b.o + . 0.0 O.0 F0 .0 0.0 �. b.0 b.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o MAID 160 °# �. °.° +0.o U �P 9� J I I BASH ROSS#20 MYERS ----� o #10 LOT 380 LOT 235 BIT. b.0 b.0 0.0 b .0 `0.d `0.0 b.0 b.0 b.o b. 0.0 .0 O.o 0.0 0.0 .0 b.0 b.o b.o 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 b.o b.o ##, 0 0.0 t.0 o.�6 '�T +� 4 b 0 IN/F o.0 + 0 +0.1q/0.0 `o.o kl.o CONC. OA� T6 N/� PATTISON PATI1S r - ` LOT 233 GRANITE CURB _ - - -- - #� o.o +0.0 0.GGI o.0 0 0 b.0 b.o b 0.0 +0 ` BEA VER S - - ° SPERIDAKOS �� r" ST GRAN. IL `1% (PUBLIC WAY N 30' W IDE) _ - POST �-�• FN D V ■ ❑ Calculation Summary Label Units Avg Max Min Avg//Min Max/Min PtSpcLr PtSpcTb O W APARTMENT PARKING AND DRIVE Fc . 1.20 7.5 0.1 12.00 .75..00 15 15 J w COMMERCIAL PARKING Fc 1.03 6.3 0.1 10.330 63.00 Q Q o z Luminaire Schedule WLS8407 HARMONY GROVE APARTMENTS SALEM, MA PM: HOLLY PLEASE CALL US FOR PRICING AT 1-800-633-8711 LN s" Z a Symbol Qty Label Lumens LLF Description ❑ F�il rim Q �{. 1 A 14000 0 .800 WLS-HP-S-5-150-CMH-FG 20 ' MOUNTING HEIGHT V BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, ALL DIMENSIONS AND LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS 2 = 3 SHOWN REPRESENT RECOMMENDED POSITIONS. THE ENGINEER AND/OR ARCHITECT H 1 B 14000 0.800 WLS-HP-S-3-150-CMH-FG 20 ' MOUNTING HEIGHT10 y MUST DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF THE LAYOUT TO EXISTING OR FUTURE FIELD CONDITIONS. - ® 19 C 14000 0.800 WLS-HP-S-3-150-CMH-FG 20 ' MOUNTING HEIGHT rn u, 3 THIS LIGHTING PATTERN REPRESENTS ILLUMINATION LEVELS CALCULATED FROM 16 D 14000 0 .800 WLS-WMA-S-3-150-CMH-FG 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT LABORATORY DATA TAKEN UNDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS UTILIZING CURRENT INDUSTRY STANDARD LAMP RATINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY APPROVED METHODS. ACUTAL PERFORMANCE OF ANY E MANUFACTURERS LUMINAIRE MAY VARY DUE TO VARIATION IN ELECTRICAL VOLTAGE, TOLERANCE IN LAMPS AND OTHER VARIABLE FIELD CONDITIONS. 0 b I �- I �I — 31'-IIY" 33'-OY" 55'-7lo Y" 64'-113/" 1 0 o _ �o 0 0 O N U 00 O O O _ _ NN LI -� W A ° ° Q - _ � _ _ _ _ ❑ _ � _ _ Q ° ° _ _ � Q ° F- � Ln 04 °Cl 1 ° oLd C: 20 00) v z = � � LOW J D, 00 ° � � 1 -IE--+ � a� 00 UPPER FLOORS o SCALE: " I'-0" o' H N OW �-- W - - ®-® ❑ ❑ 0- O oo - — 1 ° QA ° ° Q ° ° I o o CO 0W co OO O N — 11--J 0 01 0 ° — — - - - - - - _ _ ® m � � Ld L [L c � L 00 —7I Wz CV) ❑ - - - - - - ❑ — _ '� I Qm YN i The Federated Companies 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 Boston MA 02116 31'-IIY" 33'-O2" 55'-7Yu 64'-113/4" 185'-7" MRM Project Management 3 Broadway PO Box 388 31'-IIY" 331-OJ/21155'-7Y'"' -64'-113/N Beverly, Ma. 01915 FO-1 [071 o LegacyPark- Apartments - - Building TT LO Salem, MA Q ° — o- — — Q ° ° aNnG017N9 2I I — — — ° 0, AFO—, PI-ad t ® 1r# N I Vl5 I OO Oo 02 G U® — Q -� ° 71 Jr rod III b—O L01 t01 I fn FIOI i -LO 8 - 321f1SoiDN3 NH-Z -0-1-1 9p1 901 b01 Z01 001 gNnGOI:)N3 NH-Z Date: Z# NIV15 6/18/12 Z# NNIS ® - - - - - - o CO) f- - - FIRST FLOOR O ( oo — 1 I SCALE: g" = I'-0" Scale: As Noted Q Q ° Drawn By: b 'b 01 Ld L ® Q Q J Approved By: LO Revisions 0 0 First and Second Floor Plans 31'-IIY" 33'-OY" 55'-7Y11 64'-113/411 185'-7" 1 ,6 I 321-43/411 88'-8" 32'-lye" 32f-43/411 i O i o O i O O OO _ O N WHO CJ It i00 O 0) > O N N n � ❑ _ _ - - - - ❑ ❑ - - - w ° oA L ° oA — — -a — ° — ~ v LO El 1� 0) � U � � D�l -- tEmnI on CC E—)J ® �I oo on ® ® IoQ Q) �D - - — — — - - LU UPPER FLOORS < W U o r�47 - - SCALE: I' on � � I o a� O - if-!I ° ® A ° �® ° ° I -0 W 04 ® 4 QO 01 A tAJ CO 00 F Cz D L 17 - - - - - - — H UZ � � ❑ - - F CIS am Q) 0 -J The Federated Companies 535 Boylston Street 11 0 Suite 203 Boston, MA 02116 32'-43/q° 88'-8" 32'-ly" MRM Project Management b 3 Broadway 185'-7" PO Box 388 j Beverly, Ma. 01915 32'-43/4" 581-811 32'-ly" 321-43/4" 10 a a a01 Legacy Park A partments I H—= i Buildin g #2 NJ - - q - - - ❑ - - - ❑ _ Salem, MA o — -MA ° o 321nS0-17N3 ?1H I — :M—— ® � fr# 2!I`d1S ranI ® ® OO U -gill � � n OO I d I III 111A b01 L01 - f01 101 _ rn � LO 0 3Nnso1DN3 NH-Z 6F-0--1 1 801 F--9 0-1 TO1 Z01 001 3NnGOT)N3 ?1H-6 Date: 6118112 Z# '8fV-LS Z# NNIS FIRST FLO-F-5 R Scale: As Noted g" n n 0 SCALE: = I'-0" nP 30 Drawn By: bjb Ld -a- - — ❑ - - — - - ° — ° (� Approved By: _ - - - Ell - - - - - - F-1 Revisions r to N N O 1 O First and Second Floor Plans 321-431411 88'-8" 321-V2" 32'-43/4" A1 * 1 R _ lo 321-43/411 32'-Iy21 56' 6Y2" 32'-V2" 32'-43/° J J 0 0 O 00 ON U L 00 C O Q) N D � _4-v — - - - — '� - - ° oFIT 1� I Ll o z = co- w < :.. ...... ...... . . ..... oo J ® © oo I o ¢ QD � 00 OLW ER FLOOKS aQ o SCALE: g" = I'-0" N J4E:1 I N�4 L41 rW - - o® — - - o ® I 0 � o o ° ° LI ® o 01 C: �cc o � � 4 Q z3 ® W 0O (75 D 0 t 1 771 a�F Cz ft� .i LT N 0Ec v � U) <E:l - - - ❑ - - - - � Q ❑ _ _ - - r F 1 - - ❑ I - - Q �1 (1) C The Federated Companies 535 Boylston Street 0 Suite 203 Boston, MA 02116 32'-lye" 56'-6y11 32'` 21 32'-43/4" MRM Project Management 185 -7 3 Broadway 185'-7" PO Box 388 321-43/411 3214211 56'-6y n 32142" 32'-4321-43/411�� Beverly, Ma. 01915 0 7 F LegacyPark A pa rtments —FYI Build* #3 g ❑ - - - ❑ - - - ❑ - - - _Fi LI 7 Salem, MA ° ° — V 3 nGo-17N3 NH-1 0 ° — o (DELo I 4 Stk 2!I t/1S a40 ® o1 Lt 1 T81 I 101 E01 LO1 b01 III - - co i c 3NnGoiDN9 NH-Z001 Z01 bOt 901 B01 011 321f'1S0"17N3 NH-Z Date: 6/18/12 Z# ?11`d1S "---"- Z# 211415 RSTFLOOR0_L1 Scale: As Noted SCALE: g" = I'-0" ° o ° A Drawn By: bib 01 30 — (� _ ❑ _ Approved By: _ ❑ - - - - - - ❑ ❑ - - - Revisions L 0 o - �` First and Second Floor Plans 32'-43/41 32'-ly211 56'-6y" 32'-ly2" 32'-43/" A1 ,8 --- - -- — - - - - _ - - _ - --- - - -- - - --r---, - — -- ----- PARAPET ROOF 00 0� -El - B— E3--B- 'rF 1� Mott --5 C-'J IFT-Q1 FT-F11 IFTT-1 FTTI FT-T-11 =1 4P =1 1119 --T-1 FT-n FT-Q1 FT-F] FT-r-11 FT-F11 =1 FT-Q1 00 [90 H" H H H H H IFTT-11 F-Mi 11TT-1 LLU 1:1-L]i F" 11 =1 FM FMI FM FM 1-mi =1 FT-ni jaw FLOOR 4 LL EIH FFH 11 � . � IFM 1= 11 FR 11 rAH ILL-1 11 ETTI=� � � � �7T] �� ¢ , FLOOR 3 06 > I Li -600 LJ FT-1 11 1=1 FMI FMI FMI =1 FFH ]HI 4�1 FM Cr- - L'J � LU 0 LL' CO FIE QQ =1 Etl LLJ -0 The federated Companies _ _ � � _ _ _ _ e„seMEH. _ _ _ _'. � _ __ _ _ _ — _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 O�cANAL e� vanoN Boston, MA 02116 e saieg - I -o MRM Project Management 3 Broadway PO Box 388 SEE COLO)R RENDERINGS Beverly, Ma. 01915 FOR PROf=OSED MATERIALS Legacy Park- Apartments —PARAPET Building # 1 ROOF - - � -� C' �' -� — � - - �- - Salcm, MA „ a„ 11 M1 1= FMI 1=1 1=1 FMI FF Hi =1 FMI F-F-1 11 LLI-11 =11=1 FMI =1 FM =i =i - [T-F11 Scale: As Noted Drawn By: bjb FLOOR 3 r Approved By: Y ' LW �' � Revisions FLOOR 2 1-1-Lil I I F11 FFH1 =1 Mil FMI LLLJ FMI FF] R1 HE; H�H FMI a] FMI F-17] ETD 11111 1 .L.I -11 U 1.1-Ul E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0_MAN ENTRY ELEVATI.ON A2 ,91 f i PARAPET 0 i ROOF — O _ — — — U 0 L � 00 O C-4 177-11 IFT71 U � .00 ® ® ® � ® ® ® ®I®® ® H ® ® ® ® ® ® NON® �O TT-11 771 ETTI FFH' Effl = Ll- LH [5 io UD D � FLOOR4 — U U - W 6 (DL0 gFLOOR 3 — — — — — — — — — — v LL �+ o ' 60 �- �— o W ® 0o u ® � N o7771 FT7T =1 ? W j�Lj LLLJ1 EM 9D UA L=__J R � FLOOR2 — — — _ _ U '� o W 50 wm � W U :300LLLJ � z -0 FLOOR I — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — - I The Federated Companies TOM flT BASEMENT T To 535 Boylston Street — — — — I Suite 203 _ O_LA IALI I'ELEVATION _ Boston, MA 02116 SCALE. g - I -0 MRM Project Management 3 Broadway j PO Box 388 SEE COLOR REtADERINGS Beverly, Ma. 01915 FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS Legacy Park- Apartments PARAPET Building #2 0 ROOF Ln - - - - Salem, MA ---® ® LLLII H -- --- --- 7E 9E U LH EIE ±d -11 EH Iffill FLOOR .4 i Date: 6/18112 LL S ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 1"T1 ® ® =1-71711 ® 11=11 ® ® Scale: As Noted oEE11 EEE FE] EEH EE EJ U EU EU U3 Drawn By: bjb FLOOR 3 LL Approved By: _ Revisions FLOOR 2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 FLOOR IF, HE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0_MAIN ENTRY ELEVATION SCALE g I CA2 ,01 i i I k PARAPET TF 11 11 11 H 0 0 _ F 0 ROOF — — � — � MFFI� — — — — — — — — — 7DO u u _O O O N U � ® ® ® ® ® c: O UJ H± Effl Effl d ±H N N FLOOR 4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — FFH V W -Ml im 11 FM FTT11 im 11 FM n-" E411 M I FFI rMil LLI-11 =1 =1 IFTT-11 a: 7T] 777 ITTTI E—ffl 7711 ,S) � jAL=- ail o FLOOR 3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — o B Q(D v� i 7N 0 - oW oo Wmm 771 0 No® ® Q �® ® � ® ® ® ® ® ® � W nin FLOOR 2 oF. 6p 777 Effl �® ® ® ® ® ® ® CZ ® ® � � ® ® FM ® ® ® L Li � FLOOR I E — cI ) C® The Federated Companies BASEMENT _ _ W11_ TI W11 lillflI111111111111 _ I I T _TI I ELI 1 ILI_ I T H_ _211TITT IT _ flTW T TTI_ ITMOTIM_ I I ITT IT TIT I 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 CAINAL ELEVATION Boston, MA 02116 SCALE: MRM Project Management 3 Broadway l PO Box 388 SEE COLOR RENDERINGS Beverly, Ma. 01915 FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS LegacyPark Apartments PARAPET Building #3 _ a Oi ROOF _ - - - - - _M - `O - - - - Salem, MA ILL-L--L-Ji o F1 Fli =1 =11rTT M1 11=1 =1 UT11 =1 LLiJ1 =1 FM 1=1 =1 11=1 rT-" =1 =1 =1 M 11 LTT 11 [HIM FTF1 771 4= 7T] 77n— rTTI IT71 717 FLOOR 4 Date: 6/20112 S ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® Scale: As Noted oEffl FP EI= Drawn By: b j b g FLOOR 3 — — — — — — — T I ►L Approved By: _ N 11111 FTF11 =1 Fmi 1=1 1-mil IL-L-11 FMI I Mi 1=1 LJ 1=1 =1 FM =11 FMI I Mi FTFI Ll�Lli FR o - Revisions UDJI LUDJ H QJ =1 U111 FLOOR 2 =1 rTF1i Lmi FM[44] FFHI FMI =1 H T-1 I H-11 =1 =1 =10 F7-n 771 177D F7711tj --- --- Liu LLLJ1 =1 U11 =1 QJ W=L9 U�11 FLOOR I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MAIN ENTRY ELEVATION SCALE: = I -0 — A2 ,01 i I , i I O O O WST _O O O C�1 C) 00 O � > C O N N U W H � Ln Ln a � Q)QD `' i N 00 oW � I rl- F- O ry.- W W N D C Q- v} 0 C) c 0 f 0W � O coN � � I F U) (D � z � � Lqa� a [Y] Q) (D The Federated Companies 535 Boylston Street Suite 203 Boston, MA 02116 MRM Project Management anagement 3 Broadway PO Box 388 Beverly, Ma. 01915 , LegacyPark Apartments 0 - — ROOF — — — — — — - LO - �J Building # 1 L ® L ® ® ® L Salem, MA FLOOR 4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - LL - ® ® ® ® rT-F]I 1=11 o FLOOR 3 Date: 6/18112 a ® I—MI ® ® TT-11 FMI Scale: As Noted ' 0 Drawn By: b,jb i? . — FLOOR 2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — - Approved By:ir _ FTI-11 TT11 I MI =1 ® FMI I MI F1 "I L o Revisions a FLOOR I II II II II II EXTERIOR (: - C===-_ _ _ _ 0_ ELEVATIONS D2IDE ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: J = I'-0" SEE COLC)R RENDERINGS SCALE: $' = I'-0' FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS A2 . 2 Pro iect No: 7-1 ii ---- ------ REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION REVISE PER PEER REVIEW AND E P AN K 6/20/12 PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS 2 7/15/12 MISC. REVISIONS 3 11/10/12 REVISE PER REVIEWER COMMENTS. 4 9/19/12 UPDATE RES. AREA. CALCS. rj 10/11/12 ADD 1&5 HARMONY GROVE TO PROJECT 6 11/6/12 COMPILE UPDATED PLAN SET MENE7 3/11/13 MISC. REVISION FOR CON. COMM. FILING. ADD REMEDIATION. �. 8 4/25/13 MISC. REVISION FROM CON.USE DEVEL01 COMM. HEARING 9 2/30/13 REVISIONS PER MASSDEP APPEAL COMMENTS REVISIONS FOR MEPA DEIR 10 7 77 77 3/10/14 SUBMITTAL .:: ;., . _ .. 10/16/14 REVISIONS FOR MINOR MODIFICATION a ii f j LIST OF DRAWINGS : REVISED OCTOBER 16 , 2N-1 : PLAN NOTES OWNER & MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC py C-1 : BOUNDARY & ZONING PLAN 9 ABBOTT. STREET APPLICANT: 4/p C-1 S� o�y� BEVERLY, MA 01915 sT °tiT s� C--� EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN HARMONY GROVE CEMETERY ENGINEER: GRIFFIN ENGINEERING GROUP, LLC C-3: OVERALL SITE LAYOUT PLAN P.O. BOX 7061 �lr' � a Q ImoON), C 3A-C: SITE LAYOUT PLANm � GRo100 CUMMINGS CENTERROBERT � Z HD D RD. o r SUITE 224G � GRI IL .;�r cnil� O M � . J6Fg6 C-4A-C. GRADING, DRAINAGE & BEVERLY, MA 01915cc�nf�^�.Fs — ST EROSION CONTROL PLAN PgORN J'� SURVEYOR: LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES C-5A-C: UTILITIES PLAN 161 HOLTEN STREET SITE DANVE RS, MA 01923a° vER �PNP� C-6: DETAILS � SToti Q � N• R� a %y o S� o� e('T F oy gR��GE BUILDING BEAUDS ART, INC. Rsr �s� C-7.. DETAILS II cn P ARCHITECT. 15 LONGWOOD DR. C-8: DETAILS III KENNEBUNK, ME 04043 LANDSCAPE SEBAGO TECHNICS ARCHITECT: ONE CHABOT STREET cJ,T C-10: DETAILS V OF F-,N;,,� G a WESTB ROO K, ME 040'98 C0 ;.lUN'.TY DEVEL D?:�:--'" 0 0 1 OF 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SITE WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS a Q Q Q LIGHTING: 1919 WINDSOR PLACE 1 OF 1 LANDSCAPING PLAN = om 0 � FORT WORTH , TX 76110 A1 . 1 FIRST & UPPER FLOOR PLAN v' no 00 LOCUS MAP N A2cy— . 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS D N ry _ I-- Lu Lij 1 — 400' Om Om zo zo� A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 0 - T77- GENERAL _;GENERAL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT. UTILITY NOTES (CONT.) 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF THE 10. ALL PROPOSED SLOPES (EXCLUDING RIP-RAP SLOPES) STEEPER THAN 5: 1 AND ALL SLOPES 14. WHERE WATER MAINS CROSS OVER SEWER LINES WITH LESS THAN 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE, EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON THE RECORDS OF REGARDLESS OF SLOPE WITH AN OVERALL CHANGE IN GRADE GREATER THAN 10 FEET FROM TOP TO AND WHERE WATER MAINS AND SERVICES CROSS BENEATH SEWER LINES, SEWER LINE AND WATER VARIOUS PLANS AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THIS INFORMATION IS BOTTOM SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING. IT IS .THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LINE SHALL BE CAREFULLY ENCASED IN CONCRETE., ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND FROM PIPE NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPOSED SLOPES (SLOUGHING, EROSION, ETC.) THAT SURFACES A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 8" ALL AROUND AND ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND ALONG UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE START OF RESULT DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AS DIRECTED BY THE EACH PIPE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET FROM THE OTHER PIPE AS MEASURED NORMALLY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES, GOVERNING ARCHITECT/ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. FROMM ALL POINTS ALONG THE PIPES. PERMITTING AUTHORITIES, AND "DIG SAFE" AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ON SITE AT ALL TIMES ADDITIONAL HAYBALES, EXTRA SILTATION 15. PROPOSED GAS SERVICE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES INTERFERING WITH PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL FENCING, A STOCKPILE OF CRUSHED STONE, EXTRA FILTER BAGS OR ANY OTHER ITEM SPECIFIED CONFIRM WITH THE GAS COMPANY THAT GAS LINES INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE BY THE LOCAL GAS ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH THE WORK. IT HEREIN FOR EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL FOR INSTALLATION AT IFHE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE THE GAS COMPANY ADVANCE NOTICE OF WHEN THE GAS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO MITIGATE ANY EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. LINE CAN BE INSTALLED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COORDINATION, EXCAVATION, CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST BACKFILL AND COMPACTION FOR THE GAS LINE. TO THE OWNER. 12. THE AREA OR AREAS OF ENTRANCE OR EXIT TO AND FROM THE SITE SHALL BE CLEARED OF 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING STAFF AT LEAST 48 ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER 16) ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND SCHEDULED WITH THE OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. THE AREA OR AREAS OF ENTRANCE AND EXIT SHALL BE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SERVICING THE PROJECT SITE. HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT OFF OF THE PROJECT SITE. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, �DROPPED WASHED OR TRACKED OFF THE PROJECT SITE 17) DUE TO THE SMALL SCALE OF THE SITEWORK DRAWINGS' EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITY STUBS AND VERTICAL CONTROL POINTS AND BENCH MARKS NECESSARY FOR THE WORK AND FOR 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING ALL HORIZONTAL MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. FOR BUILDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE 63UILDING DRAWINGS. SERVICE STUBS TO PROVIDING ANY CONTROL INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO THE BUILDING THE BUILDING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO A POINT 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING WALL UNLESS13. PRIOR TO INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED. CONTRACTOR. ENGAGE AN INDIVIDUAL WITH PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND EXPERTISE IN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL TO MONITOR SAME. THE EROSION CONTROL MONITOR SHALL PREPARE A MONTHLY REPORT 18 THE PRIMARY ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION) SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY WETLAND AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT. TEST PITS TTS SHOW CONDITIONS OBSERVED 4. TEST PITS WERE DONE FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STORMWATER FIELD DESIGN AND WHICH SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES. ALL ASPECTS OF THE THESE SERVICES SHALL BE DESIGN/BUILD BY INFILTRATION AT THESE SPECIFIC POINTS ONLY. THEY DO NOT NECESSARILY SHOW THE NATURE OF ALL FEDERAL AGENTS UPON REQUEST. THIS REPORT SHALL INDICATE THE STATUS OF THE EROSION THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL, AND UTILITY COMPANY CONTROLS AND ANY MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AND PERFORMED. INSPECTIONS AND REPORTS SHALL STANDARDS AND CODES. THE OWNER HAS VERIFIED THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE ELECTRIC AND j MATERIALS TO BE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM TELEPHONE SERVICES. ALL COSTS AND FEES ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING THESE SERVICES 1 5. GRADES, BOTH EXISTING AND FINISHED, ARE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. THE LLC THAT WILL HOLD (NPDES) PERMIT. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FURNISHING AND INSTALLING ALL STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT, CONDUIT, THE CONTRACT AND/OR ENGINEER ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR EXISTING GRADES SHOWN ON WIRING, POLES, TRANSFORMERS, PADS, PERMITS, EASEMENTS, ETC. NECESSARY TO BRING THESE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL AREAS WHEREIN GRADES, ARE SHOWN TO SATISFY 14. ANY DEWATERING REQUIRED ON THE SITE SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A TEMPORARY SILT REMOVAL SERVICES TO THE BUILDING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY HIMSELF AS TO ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND INCORPORATE ANY DISCREPANCIES DISCOVERED. BASIN LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 100' BUFFER ZONE FROM WETLANDS. OF TEH CONTRACTOR UNLESS SPECIFIC ARRANGEMENTS ARE: MADE WITH THE OWNER IN WRITING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING ALL CONTROL POINTS AND MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID. THE BUILDING CONTRAkCTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NECESSARY FOR THE WORK. PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PRESERVE MATERIALS OUTSIDE THE 15. REFER TO THE OPERATIONS & MAINTENCE PLAN (0&M) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. INSTALLING WIRES AND CONDUIT FROM 10' OUTSIDE THE BUIILDING TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL LINE OF LIMIT OF WORK IN THE MOST UNDISTURBED CONDITIONS POSSIBLE. ROOM. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: 4, PARKING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: 1. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A GAS/OIL HOOD ON THE DISCHARGE PIPE AND 19) LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS AND PHOTOMETRICS ARE BY WLS LIGHT OF FORTH WORTH, TEXAS AND 1. HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESHALL HAVE A 4' DEEP SUMP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASSACHUSETTS STORMWATER ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES. (CIRCUITRY IS TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF JANUARY 1992, AS AMENDED. MANAGEMENT POLICY. THE SITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR HIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SITE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF A COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL SITE LIGHTING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WILL 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING DESIGNATED WITH A "V" SHALL BE SIGNED AS "VAN ACCESSIBLE" PER ADA 2. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE RCP, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL STANDARDS AND CODES, INCLUDING WIRING CONDUIT, STRUCTURES, 4.1.2.58. BASES, POLES, FIXTURES, ETC. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUIT, WIRING, 3. ALL STORM SERVICE CONNECTIONS (ROOF LEADERS) SHALL BE 6" INSIDE DIAMETER SCH40 PVC ETC. UP TO 10' FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. BUILDING CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 3. ALL CURBING SHALL BE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE UNLESS NOTED OR DETAILED OTHERWISE. OF CHDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY ENGINEER. INSTALLING WIRES AND CONDUIT FROM 10' OUTSIDE THE BUILDING TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL ROOM. 4. ALL LIMITS OF PAVING SHALL BE CURBED UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE. 4. A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER SERVICES CROSS 5. ALL STANDARD PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 9' IN WIDTH BY 19' IN LENGTH, WITH 24' AISLE DRAIN LINES. UNLESS NOTED OR DETAILED OTHERWISE. 5. RIP RAP SPLASH PADS AND FLOW SPREADER BERMS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL OUTFALLS. 6. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL BE PAINTED WITH 2 COATS OF PAIINT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 6. REFER TO THE OPERATIONS & MAINTENCE PLAN (O&M) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS BETWEEN COATS OF PAINT UNLESS THE PAINT MANUFACTURER REQUIRES LONGER IN WHICH CASE THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS SHALL GOVERN. UTILITY NOTES: 1. ALL WATER MAINS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET OF COVER AND A 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND MAXIMUM OF SIX FEET OF COVER EXCEPT AS NOTED, DETAILED OTHERWISE, OR REQUIRED BY THE DIMENSIONS OF BUILDING SIDEWALKS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY. A VARIATION IN THESE DEPTHS IS PERMITTED (IF ALLOWED BY DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY) WHERE REQUIRED TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH OTHER UTILITIES. HOWEVER, CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL WATER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES IN 8. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND MARKING ARE TO CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, INCLUDING GUIDELINES. BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLEARANCES, BEDDING, BACKFILL, INSULATION, ETC. ANY VARIATION FROM THE ! EROSION CONTROL NOTES: PLAN LAYOUT MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 1. THE LIMIT OF THE WORK LINE FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE LIMIT OF THF_ 2. GENERALLY, WATER MAIN FITTINGS IDENTIFIED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE SHOWN FOR INSTALLATION WORK NECESSARY FOR GRADING OR UTILITY PURPOSES. NO WORK SIHALL OCCUR BEYOND THESE LOCATION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THAT NOT ALL FITTINGS REQUIRED FOR THE 1 6/20/12 CHANGE TITLE BLOCK LIMITS OR BEYOND THE LIMITS DEFINED BY THE HAYBALE/SILTTENCE.. WORK ARE NOTED, SHOWN, OR INDICATED. i 2. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 3. ALL WATER MAIN FITTINGS, TEES, HYDRANTS, ETC. SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH CONCRETE No] Date Description WITH THE MASSACHUSETTS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR URBAN AND THRUST BLOCKS. Revisions SUBURBAN AREAS, DATED MARCH 1997, AS AMENDED, AND ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL REGULATIOPIS. 4. ALL HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 6" C.L.D.I. RUNOUT AND SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN P LACE PRIOR TO THE APPROPRIATELY SIZED GATE VALVE, BOX, AND TEE FITTING. ALL HYDRANTS SHALL MEET LOCAL COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK OR EARTHWORK OPERATIONS AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, AND REMAIN IN PLACE, UNTIL ALL SITE WORK IS COMPLETE AND LOCAL MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANTS AND THEIR PIPING SHALL BE MECHANICALLY GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED. RESTRAINED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY MADE AWARE THAT THE SOIL CHARACTERISTICS, TOPOGRAPHY, AND 5. A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET CLEAR HORIZONTAL SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY THE WETLANDS PROXIMITY AT THIS SITE MAKE IT PARTICULARLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO SOIL EROSION AND SEWER MAINS AND WATER MAINS. WHENEVER CONDITIONS PREVENT A LATERAL SEPARATION OF 10 s� SENSITIVE TO ITS CONSEQUENCES. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE DEEMED FEET TO A WATER MAIN, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID IN A ;SEPARATE TRENCH AND THE �c> ROBERT H. 4' NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER OR THE MUNICIPALITY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ELEVATION THE CROWN OF THE SEWER SHALL BE AT LEAST 18 11`4CHES BELOW THE INVERT OF THE o CriFFw WATER MAIN. CIVIL . 5. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OFA 14 � #36686 SINGLE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORE THE SITING, 6. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES 2.5" AND SMALLER SHALL BE TYPIE K COPPER TUBING AND SHALL BE RELOCATION, AND AUGMENTATION OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING HAYBALES, SILTFENCE, INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED CORPORATION STOP WITH APPROVED SADDLE, CURB STOP, F+ °���`� � ,A DRAINAGE SWALES, TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATIONS BASINS, CRUSHED STONE, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR AND BOX. SHALL ANTICIPATE AND MODIFY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BASED ON PAST AND CURRENT WEATHER CONDITIONS, SEASON AND EXPECTED FUTURE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AS THE PROJECT 7. ALL WATER MAINS 3" OR LARGER SHALL BE CEMENT LINED DWCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, AND PROGRESSES AND SITE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS CHANGE. IN THE EVENT THAT INSUFFICIENCIES IN THE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED FITTINGS AND GATE VALVES. EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES ARE IDENTIFIED BY THE OWNER, OR AN AGENT FOR THE OWNER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING, SUPPLEMENTING, RELOCATION, OR OTHERWISE 8. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH APPROPRIATELY SIZED GATE, BOX AND LEGEND CTvpiccl All Sh ee ts� PROVIDING EROSION CONTROLS AS NECESSARY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. TEE FITTINGS. ■ ■ - 6. STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH STAKED HAYBALES AND/OR SILTATION FENCES TO 9. ALL WATER MAIN APPURTENANCES, MATERIALS, METHODS OF IINSTALLATION AND TESTING a se/oH STONE BOUND/DRILL HOLE PROP. BUILDING Gratin O DRILL HOLE PROP. RETAINING WALL PREVENT AND/OR CONTROL SILTATION AND EROSION. THE LOCATION OF THE STOCKPILE AREAS REQUIREMENTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS. Engineering MAY BE MODIFIED AS APPROVED BY THE ON-SITE EROSION CONTROL MONITOR, BUT SHALL BE O IRON ROD PROP. BIT. CONC. CURB Group, LLC LOCATED OUTSIDE THE 100' WETLAND BUFFER ZONE. TOPS OF STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED IN 10. PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TEST, DISINFECTION AND FLUSHING 'SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPERTY LINE - - PROP. EDGE OF GRAVEL SUCH A MANNER THAT STORMWATER DOES NOT INFILTRATE THE MATERIALS AND THEREBY SUCCEED ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IN MAKING IT UNSUITABLE FOR FILL USE. ALL COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH UTILITY TESTS, FLUSHING AND INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY THE - - EASEMENT LINE PROP. CONTOUR P.O Box 7061 LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. MEAN HIGH WATER LINE w PROP. WATER LINE 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G wV 7. EARTHWORK ACTIVITY ON THE SITE SHALL BE DONE IN A MANOR :SUCH THAT RUNOFF IS Beverly, MA 01915 DIRECTED TO TEMPORARY DRAINAGE SWALES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS. 11. PRIMARY WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTED SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE POINT WHERE EXIST. BUILDING PROP. WATER GATE VALVE D4 THE WATER LINE ENTERS THE BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS. EXIST. CURB PROP. HYDRANT Tel: 978-927-5111 8. HAYBALE FILTERS AND/OR FILTER BAGS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALIL EXISTING & PROPOSED CATCH _-_� BASINS SUBJECT TO STORMWATER RUN-OFF FROM PROPOSED EARTHWORK AREAS DURING 12. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPES SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) SDR35 UNLESS NOTED H H H H H H H H!Hill. EXIST. RAILROAD TRACKS S PROP. SEWER GRAVITY LINE Fax: 978-927-5103 CONSTRUCTION, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER/ENGINEER. NO SED)IMENTS SHALL ENTER THE OTHERWISE. EXIST. RETAINING WALL PROP. SEWER MANHOLE ON-SITE OR OFF-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AT ANY TIME. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE INSTALLED INSIDE CATCH BASINS IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREA WHERE HAYBALES WILL INTERFERE WITH TRAFFIC. 13. A MINIMUM OF 18" CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER MAINS CROSS STORM - - -14- - - EXIST. CONTOURS G PROP. GAS LINE MRM PROJECT DRAIN LINES. O EXIST. FENCE M GV PROP. GAS GATE VALVE 9. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE ROUTINELY INSPECTED„ CLEANED AND REPAIRED OR MANAGEMENT LLC REPLACED AS NECESSARY THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTIION. INSPECTIONS SHALL TAKE W EXIST. WATER LINE D PROP. DRAIN LINE PLACE AT LEAST ONE A WEEK AT THE END OF THE WORKWEEK, PRIO)R TO WEEKENDS AND WHEN (wV EXIST. WATER GATE VALVE OO PROP. CATCHBASIN SALEM, MA PRECIPITATION IS FORECASTED. DEFICIENCIES OF ANY KIND SHALL BIE CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE O EXPECTED PRECIPITATION OR PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE FOR THE VWEEKEND. INSPECTIONS SHALL � EXIST. HYDRANT PROP. DRAIN MAHOLE ALSO OCCUR AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.5" (OF RAINFALL AND DEFICIENCIES s EXIST. SEWER GRAVITY LINE RL PROP. ROOF LEADER CORRECTED DURING THAT WORK DAY. FM -� EXIST. SEWER FORCE MAIN PROP. TRANSFORMER PAD O EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE FIM G EXIST. GAS LINE EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES �•d D4 EXIST. GAS GATE VALVE 100' BUFFER ZONE D EXIST. DRAIN LINE 200' RIVERFRONT AREA ® EXIST. CATCHBASIN DEGRADED DEGRADED SURFACES PER F.O.R.A.D. ® EXIST. DRAIN M'AHOLE HMC HISTORIC MILL COMPLEX PER F.O.R.A.D. `ob EXIST. UTILITY POLE SqgL% 1r=4o' a--�- EXIST. UTILITY POLE W/ LIGHT Job No, 700 File Name: P/P/S/h-b N - 1 Dqt-e-,' 12/20/11 NOTES• 1) THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING EXISTING ZONING FEMA 100-YEAR INFORMATION AND LOT BOUNDARIES. FLOOD ZONE 2) BOUNDARY SURVEY BY LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC., DANVERS, MA. ZONE AE (EL. 10.8) - - - 3) ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ON THE 1929 N.G.V.D. DATUM. 4) SUBSURFACE UTILITIES EXIST ON-SITE AND ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. r \ SB/DH 3 HARMONY GROVE O \ ho^ \ \ (HLD LINE) ROAD PROPERTY IS O P MAP 1�L(�33-7- �-- h`O \ 25' WIDE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE G Ri ' / N F \ S.E.S.D. SEWER WETLAND FLOOD O�%�' HARMONY GROVE CORP. \ \ EASEMENT HAZARD OVERLAY (�-�R E) 1 HARMONY GROVE RD. \ SB/DH \ r' DISTRICT i 0' �1Q � o ( 20,909E SQ. FT ) FND & HLD \ EXISTING MEAN HIGH M,AP 16 LOT 238 ► r 5 / / WATER LINE IN THIS N/F i 0.48± ACRES �� of , \ \ PORTION OF THE 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC �,- S \Lo CANAL. - LAND COURT PLAN 33813A °25' WIDE �o ao , NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL ss °�3 _ _ - - - �'� S.r- SEWER Na 19 i _ '-Wouu & METAL 252 f `�A' ENTRANCE 0 �zT--BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE CORRIDOR iy EASEMENT- DECK= EL. 9.2t _� \ OVERLAY � '9 �p1� r -- 60 GROVE STREET R1 -'D\ I ENTRANCE MAP 16 LOT 239 \ DISTRICT \ gPpCORRIDOR N/F ENTIRELY WITHIN THE �O> - r� , OVERLAY MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT EXISTING WETLAND FLOOD DISTRICT (3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD) 561'53'05"E BRIDGE 35,561 SQ.FT. `�\ HAZARD DISTRICT _btA1�6 LOT 378 \�� EXIST. N25'16'20"E 0.82 ACRES 119.45 ABUTMENTS J T / �,� RAILROAD 30.50' _\\� N F N= CROSSING 1 L=141.17 - - - - - - --, - a-�_ o-_ --- o- HARMONY GROVE CORP. EASEMENT ; - "- R-`g44.g1' 15 ± N23'11'05"E _Io (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) I L-149.4`- - - BA Y s61.53 05 E 1.79 TRANSPORTATION TION AUTHORITY R.R. TRACKS 0 44,432± SQ. FT 8== 844.81 �}} �{�����r���� ��������� ���I,I,I I I I I I_I�� lI+I1f-ffk{+IHH+tH+Hflt+-Hf1Hk�I+fl}, H++H+IH11+H+ Io1.0 1. I - ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, R+HHH+H+ III H [III R.R. TRACKSI„+H �+I+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S � 4�-4� L=397.1 8 0 -u RET. LL �' ,, ,,, „v: , �; - �.'�\ S64�68.84'„E �\ � SSAGHUSETT �' _ - --= F�=X814.31 � -� Q� AN/�,t--� �J - - _ - - _ _ BUILDING 59 \ N22'09 28 W LU(;I. R BARREL \ I MASSA- - - 1 H - - - S10'08'10"E HORD 11. I 01'13'59"W N24 40 18 E L=29.5 CHORD=43.10', `� ,99 ALL STORAGE EXISTING ' _ LC =12 ± W \ 90.33 R=2844.81 w LC=44'± G NIT EL y.6 STORAGE MAP 16 LOT 237 X15 E �% I ENTRANCE CORRIDOR 30.50' ¢ \ LOCI RE I� g, AREA EXISTING N F S 5$ I OVERLAY DISTRICT �- 89.58 I T wAL--. 10 IV 517 68, N OFFICE MRM PROJECT MANAGEMEN S09'52'11"W b/ I I WETLAND FLOOD CONC -"�E,--L; g 6+ /�/� BUILDING (60 GROVE STREET) 26.59' FEMA 100-YEAR EXISTING MEAN HIGHT, 7, /-/ 1 = FLOOD ZONE NI co HAZARD OVERLAY CHIMNEY �� R r R/I/ \ 26,946 SQ.FT. WATER LINE IS INSIDE , ; ER G.a 0.62 ACRES ` TIE LINE„ o DISTRICT �' WETLAND FLOOD / FACE OF RETAINING �''''�� S5p•�' CANAL� \ANIT z ZONE AE (EL. 10.8) of o HAZARD OVERLAY-�/ WALL IN THIS PORTION ���""� "' ?"E T/D,q� \ E BLO(;K kE� S09'30 54 W w ' m �� o DISTRICT / 62. %�T,- I_ I I �1 / OF THE CANAL. z r>;T \ WALL TpW ^ I 38.56' ••r cel <t FINISHING \ _ EL. 9.- 0 ` � c`oV �` �` BUILDING "' AN,,�.,�\ LO ��• _ N m o ;r„ ;, C-k R _ A l S388.20 8 E \� ,n 00 I m I � °��.� ' T W \ T _ Z C11 1 I o 1 0 o I CONC. LANDING COOPERAGE \ v _ 6t � I MAP 16 LOT 236 ROOM Nog• I N/F FEMA 100-YEAR` `- / -2"W MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT FLOOD ZONE / WETLAND FLOOD 1 ZONE AE (EL. 10.8) \ / HAZARD OVERLAY S16'16'13"W I 286.47' ST I (64 GROVE STREET) ONE DISTRICT \ UPDATE FEMA FLOOD ZONE 1 RET WAz I 2 54,1 ACRES i \ `v \ \ 54.44 2 10 1s 14 � FEMA 100-YEAR � / / MAP 16 LOT 217 i FLOOD ZONE ADD 1&5 HARMONY GROVE N/F / 1 10/1/12 ROADESD TO PLAN. ' 12 SARKES ZONE AE (EL 10:$) \ - - � � GATE .�.�- �\ , E \ R-96.82 No Date Description PRETREATMENT „El \ L=39.20' #6 1 CONC. \\ , I Revisions - - - - - ,N FACILITY RET. _ _ BPD DISTRICT Z- - I _ _ ) BPD DISTRICT _ BP[? DISTRICT _ _ r SILVER L - - - MAP 16 LOT 218 p - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o „ �-�=---='�- a '''-� � P I STR I CT r/ I NTF ,* R2 DISTRICT N60-26'11"W N30'35 46 E S30'55 09 W N30'43 13 E R2 DISTRICT DN 0 K RET. PUBLIC WAY FLORES 2 i � A N60'17'03"W 172.12 10.47' 10.34' 10.02 AL SULFONATION - \ - � � i - - - - - - Z - - - - - N60_17'03"W BUILDING 1 N44'11 20 W\ � MAP 16 LOT MQ 16 ° o r 39'27 56 WI ^� , ° ' 93.110' -r--1-7,.8_Z------ %? , " w� #� 50.50 � ATE i3 224 _ - - - o o. LOT 225 - MAP 16 ---_ ° - . �. 18.72 \ WAREHOUSE / 29.28' I J p I N/F #34 N/F OT 227 #28 °- SHED SHEDO� N10'00'12"W \ S2334 49 W MAP 16 LOT 76 Q o MAP 16 LOT I CONLEY I TUC ER - S31*18'30"W �� 10.34 /� S58'S2'37"WI � R0 _RT qG I N/F ��'�o I 223 I N/F ' N60'39 54`W N60'39'54"W 22.60 28.00' i �` ,� � _ 11.98 li GRl Fl FLORES #2 �°)� I I 60'42 07"W '#32 LAWSON N3038'46" _ , - - FISH - - , H. 'IN N/F 113.68 POND x h'------❑- ,-- -°------- WALL \ -ZAU N - - c� MAP 16 A&N REAL 29. 4 120.47 I 1 86 80 \ 1 -_U N61'25 51 W L4" �`j�( _ ��LF a 11 #36686 l LOT 222 ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 23 x GARDE 0 - #36686 R -� +� Q ,� � 34.51 _ ; z ���`• MAP 16 I ' N/F TRUST N/F I �• 1.17 W ._�... AI_L\ �-,--...� s61'o1 28 W ,y � � LOT 220 Y ,, , LX w N71'2 ! - \ 14.97 II �� F N/F j� _ KOHLOFER DEMEULE civ MAP 16 LOT 232 - I _ gg,9g'N31'27'40"E .#2 s64'15'5o"W MAP 16 ❑ BLANDEN m �/ ,,, ,,, I I I Q ILOT 231% r�'o N/F b � �� \ 11.15' �� !Q.id•� Y o � MYERS rn� ` 16.51 MAP 16 / 44 „ , p N o #10 LOT 235 \ ` oo ;- MAP 16 N/F \ / N51'56 28 W 1 ►� z I I I , „ I ,,, , , I N/F 20 �� N oo ►�'� ; OT 3 0 „ 3#48 <t I ROSS # ter" o REFERENCES: Z S32'54'25" #40 #38 #36 I 30 MAP 16 LOT 229 I ' #24 I y z MAP 16 LOT 6 LOT 234 PATTISON \ 107.76 / / # 1 233 # N N/F N/F PAT11SON 1) DEED BOOK 25700 PAGE 109 31.90' / N #14 �FCSWIGGIN 2) DEED BOOK 7654 PAGE 26 - - - BASH - - - / o _ _ N60'35'43"W 1 SPERIDAKOS _ N54'54'20"W \\ ■ 3) PLAN BOOK 152 PLAN 98 N60'02'30"w BEA VER Ivso•4o'37"W GRAN. 64.51' 2.81' \ Gnrrin 4 LAND COURT PLAN 11241 B 20. ' S TREE T , \ # 23 POST 40.0 5) PLAN #8828 (CITY) - - - - 0 FND En ineenn 6) PLAN IN DEED BK. 5452 PG. 111 - - - - - - (PUBLIC WAY N 30 WIDE) - ENTRANCE CORRIDOR - - - - - - - - OVERLAY DISTRICT �\ Group, LLC g 7) PLAN IN DEED BK. 4983 PG. 400 - - - - (SEE ZONING SEC. 8.2.2) P.O Box 7061 MAP 16 LOT 242 _o I gPp'p� ;I 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G N/F _ o _ _ _ -rs Beverly, MA 01915 HARMONY GROVE - - - CORPORATION _ _ ��_�- I 1 !:5 c1� - - - I 1 - c;w Tel: 978-927-5111 -° ° _ _ _ - - ' __MA1�6 LOT 378 rn\Q�1 Fax: 978-927-5103 o W5 IDE R1 DISIR�C� - - - - f N/F SEWER _ _ - RISS- - - T HARMONY GROVE CORP. D _ EASEMENT - - --�-p - - '-� ° (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) - I MRM PROJECT RA _ - O - _ - 010 44,432± SQ. FT - - - y GR�V_E _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ =_ _ _ - ___,- I _11� 1.0 - MANAGEMENT, LLC • EXIST. MEAN HIGH �- HARM �N _ - -_ _ _ .�_ _-_ - -_____ TTS SALEM MA WATERPORTION OF THE - - �- _ - - _ - __�- _ I � 1� MASSACHUSE ' ° o CANAL. _ - _ - _ - I I H{11� = - -_ -� �-- �� - - - CKS vfulAP 16 LOT 378 -�_-� �� R.R. TRA _ 5815 F N/F _ _�' - X569' _ (!1 - - - - - -- ___(5 ARMONY HARMONYROVE GROVE ORP. ALpNG R1VSR��- I pIS1RtICT f1��14++tt� -,3i-I i��- - 89.58' ��- - - - - - - r -. - __�_-� 44,432± SQ. FT D ) ��`t GRITY _ - I _ 1 rn _ 1.02 A AU TH } _�'' I TACT �� I n FEMA 100-YEAR �I BOUNDARY & - TA TI CN _ - - _ R2 EXIST. MEAN HIGH I ZONE AE (EL. 10018 NI o ZONING PLAN -< _ TIDAL _ _ ANSPOR �{I}_ _ - _ _ WATER LINE IN THIS Iz ( ) �Io o _ - _ _ _�- L=1 37.83 - RIVER CANAL 1 BAY {}_H+ I - - ENTRANCE PORTION OF THE I M�_ I m �n I MAP 16 LOT 216 I R _ - E TTS 1 kH _ _ CORRIDOR CANAL. 1 N/F �,��° I I �170 -� NORTH- �--- SSA C H U S - _ _ _ _ - =_ �- OVERLAY RAYMOND io � ' I 1 JJ M A DISTRICT m �\ _ _ GRAPHIC SCALE N 00 1171 I Scales l•=40' MAP 86 LOT 135A J __ - ��� D co N/F ���--� - - MAP 26 LOT 40 _ N I +o 0 70 ,o eo iso z 1 1 o I Job No,: 700 SOUTHERN ESSEX _ N/F SEWERAGE DISTRICT \ - _ -�'�� TRACKS MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY N _ I C- 1 R.R. IRA 4 -4 IN FEET ) I - N49 30�2„ I Name PIPISIh-b OWN - nI� 1 inch = 40 ft. I 286.479 --_ I �� 12/20/11 BOUND - - NOTES FLOODWAY NOTE FEMA 100-YEAR 1) THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING EXISTING CALCULATED FLOODWAY LIMIT IS BASED ON HEC-RAS ANALYSIS® - FLOOD ZONE CONDITIONS. OF NORTH RIVER CANAL PREPARED BY GRIFFIN ENGINEERING. / ZONE AE (EL. 10.8) - - 2) EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY BY LEBLANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC., MODEL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS PER MASSDEP NOVEMBER 2013 DANVERS, MA. LETTER TO GRIFFIN ENGINEERING (DOWNSTREAM ELEV. 0 GROVE - _ ST = 10.8; EQUAL CONVEYANCE METHOD) WITH 1-FOOT / 3) ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ON THE 1929 N.G.V.D. VERTICAL RISE IN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION. �+ \ 4) UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE THE RESULT OF RECORDS OF VARIOUS PLANS 1 AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE ABSENSE OF -�0�� EXIST. rn, / $ SUBSURFACE UTILITIES IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO O 13'o �QFCURB CU RIM 8.110 �oN,, \ -� CONTACT "DIG SAFE" AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK. 1p t�c� i I(I V=5.80 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. 3 HARMONY GROVE V.�I� I(OU =5.85 / ' / I \ \ Z/ i � � 6) PER SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION O.R.A.D. (FILE #64-516) DECISION ROAD PROPERTY IS �..r� OPO / - - _ -'T- �- L ! \ 25' WIDE • • " • • , 20p' 0 DATED 7-19-2011 THE 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN ENTIRELY WITHIN THE �� R -_8_ a \ �� S.E.S.D. SEWER • • Aft \ / \ / `� �16v RIVERFRONT AREA. AS OF 6-20-12 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OF SAID WETLAND FLOOD O\I _ / / / / MAP 16 LO 3 EASEMENT • DECISION ARE CONTINUING AT MA DEP. HAZARD OVERLAY GR E� \ 12 VC. •• W�0 f -�sE�� (1 HARMONY GROVE RD.)c -OUTFALL \ MAP 16 L.OT 238 ' • • l DISTRICT On 1`� 50 �� �s o I / 12 VC 20,909± SQ. `FT 1=5.31 1�1 ,., �--5 /� OUTFALL N/F \ 1-4.31 0.48 ACRES \ 50 GROVE STREET' REAL EST, LLC PR� C w �FL� i �- ' � / BANK#7 t \ BLl �,' �_ _ /"� LAND COURT PLAN 33813A TOP N �P� G..,N -� BArys�Is/ CALCULATED ZL FLOODWAY LIMIT rA coA AL 1J NOR TH RIVER CAN - TIDAL °25' WIDE BANK y!i� / Ai#" � z.a - - WUUU & METAL S.E.S.D. SEWER �%i /_ i�/ 1. -k'°` 'BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE \ !y9 EASEME '� ��ANK#4 i.a _- CK L. 60 GROVE STREET / , •� -y�� /r is ► DECK= EL 9.21 BANK 1! _ _ -- --� PROPERTY IS / % \ BANV�#� BANK#8 BANK#9 / BANfG 1U �� BANK#2 = � *' c° # \� - •- - �� \ '�""�- ENTIRELY WITHIN THE MAP 16 LOT 239 -�- 9,N,L�� -. \ WETLAND FLOOD ` - EXISTING L G�'�c'• /BANK#1 �- �� 3 HARMONY GRO -E RD. BANK#1 `�...- \ ( � ) \\ .� HAZARD OVERLAY '- 35,561 SQ: T. -�� --B- - BRIDGE 10 EXIST. \\ ABUTMENTS DISTRICT F�J / \ 0.8�GRES MH �� RO �+� �X1.5FORCE MAIN \ . �_ - 7- CROSSING - - - _ FM MAP 16 LOT 378 , �� 8 \\ � (5 HARMONY GROVE R D.) _='"--.ICK#s � '`'��'' - �. - - - - - - - � - -- °-�-'-- c� --- o =--o --�-�_ � -- Y - 44,4321 SQ. FT . - - EASEMENT - - AUTHORIT O S _ _ _ TRANSPOR TA TION R.R. TRP,cKs R /�- +''SIH r_i�rtfi-trrritr_1i I }If{ I{HI }IfIF #_ --- - \� -Uf1N iiii�iiiii�i fit I�' _ - u,il1.LLS +�'I-�f'f-ITtTTTT-I-T"�'�'1'YI i TTi f . 1.02 ACRES _ 9 1Ti «r��i „ iii - - - H�++H H 11+1 I i I FHS H�I +' BANK,5 rrr-rrrrri7rr � � i�i� ii�iiiiii _ - BANK#4 R R. TRP�CKS r_ _ - - - P LO 237 _.__- - ' - BANK 3 C - - "�` A= -== •_� �� -- J TOF OF I IIT. G NC. EGR�.` � C UL R # _10-..I �- '."..�.`r� V�ALL „% - , - ED 60 RO STR T - D SE TT -;// /'FQ` CALCULATED -� P 'EMEp T _- 110- F _ o •• _ 19 L eD BANK#2 MASSACHUSETTS _� --_=- - ---\� 1 / FLOODWAY LIMIT `� hRgN B- L� BANK BARREL 6 BANK#1 I( R _ \ - -. - --_ = ____ \ \ BUIL 'llo RE 1. y O ,�� ",, - ACRESt1 \ . .- =- - -- -- __ - - j / DING 59 ® �\ q� ST AGE 2 ro }}I1Ei�4 _ =��=12- _ - -\ \ �\,� _ � . LL !�_ 8 EXISTING ,''- y��q�R pS, , - --''�''`:- - - 14 EL. 9.6f STORAGE _ _ -_�_ - - -- __`- � \ \ j� I \ \ �. - K AREA ::::-20-__- \ \ \ y, A EA 1 \\ RET. W EXISTING _ ' \\ r° -10_ -~`--A_LL TQ OFFICE ���5 �, �'\ \ ! B'IT. N _- _ '`--w = EL. BIT. CONC. \�, - ,> \ 9 BUILDING n �Fff1AA tM_ YEAR �oN� \ \ \ _ J �A� GONG ORTy PAVEMENT FF . --�v v v FLOOD ZONE CHIf� E >' ER ekrsr. « o / / a ;;,,,,,; CG 5 6 sEI1 \ RANI TER / I / 'IO \ \ P WETLAND FLOOD (A/ J I z i/ �/ /ZONE AE (EL. 10.8) \ \ ��, 1 Lz/ / 10---1 EXISTING L- �'/Q eLOcK , D� _ HAZARD VERLAY w ' 24- - - -o \ / OVERHEAD AL RET. \\ \ 1 /--_I / W Y STRUCTURE w _ � DISTRICT/ / � x . �. � WALL w, FINISHING ""'''%;. .,__ 9. '° �'-- ' _ ADD EXIST. STREET DRAINAGE - IN FRONT OF 60 GROVE ST. 0 ti EXIISTING 6+ �, 5 10/16/14 BUILDING � "_ 2 \ ® OVEPHEAD ' , / < F' -4 UPDATE FEMA FLOOD ZONE _ --� \ \ ` - \ I �DeRADED ft STRUCTURE ®CALCULATED � ' __._.._.K DESIGNATION ----r-1- - _- _28; o ` \ _ o ` F MAP 16 LOT 236 \ Rf1KE ��IT. COP . D NC' LANDIN �� FLOODWAY LIMIT ,�.6 f \���, •- 4 2/30/13 ADD 1' CONTOURS (EL. 4-12) == 64 GROVE STREET 1 G H&I COOPERAGE A A ---__ & CALCULATED FLOODWAY / ( ) \ P �EMT�(TYPICAL) D C - _.._ --.._ ._._=...-•--- .,� . "'."-., \ .,,,, e .FT. � -®., �., '�--_o .� ROOM � �-... 1®,,.-.. ,�• LIMIT. SEE FLOODWAY NOTE. 1 234152 SQ l I „ FEM 100-YEAR ` '�`R C "'`- j6 s 5.38 ACRES � FLOOD ZOtJE� --�. / O'1Dirl7r. TLA FL D �' / ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA - � -'+. \' 1�' AZA D 0 RLA ��� z LINES. - - - - ZOI�E�A� (EL. 10.� ® .., I1 BIT. CONC. (C0�1 �A��A \ 3 3/11/13 STON`'� �' `�- \ 16I e e \ \j� _ - �--- y�\� '�- ,PAVEMENT �' i, �D) �� - DIS ICT ><X1 T ;r 1 Q 2 10/1/12 ADD INFO FOR 1&5 HARMONY I ERE \ \ \3 \ ? - - - - �f ) IT. Gz t` e \ 11 GROVE ROAD. � e _ � I� � � � u � i� ��.. FEMA 100 YEAR \ �� \ 1 \ FLOOD ZONE �� / EI, EXIST. -� ADD AUL AREAS, UPDATE MAP 16 LOT 217 L 2 0 -18- -- - �, 4 \ '� D __ __-- -_.- - - - _� --_ - �'�.-i� Q t v I t. R ._. �VmL 0 1 6/20/12 UTILITIES & NOTE 6. e - -'_'_ -- �j / � / ZONE AE (EL 10.8 -e --- �r I N/F ,, e o e -20- \ 2 0 SARKES a� �� :� �� �� �22-- - -- - - - - - - - - -22- - - - - -���- - -- - �` ` -_ 14- - -� �� /moi N, �.� l�(�� C��'� .. cam, 72� « w N©. Date Description y - ' _ �ESIVI #12 � - -16- - -� � _ 44 _. - _ - - - - - - - - - e -24- - x-26- -- -� \\ \ �, „ EI � �" ---I1'-.� ' Y�--------4�1 EXIST. 10" S�V^:<_F 24- ' \\\\\\ PRETREATME ,, - 14 s,C-.�_S ,�, -\ -s Esti9M2 "' - \ _ �~ ET. S i^' � Revisions MAP 16 LOT 218 �/�' ~V?\ `" - -28- - _26 _ _ - - _ - _ -X28 26- _l'".��/ '- -\\\\\\\�\� -_ - \ - ^1 11� ! G, SILVER , - _`---- _-_--__ _ _ �� =20----- - - �'�� -� - _ -30- _32- "�' / -� _ '� _� C _ (PUBLIC WAY - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - --- -- - _ _ ` -- _ L - _ _ _ `''= _ FLORES \ - --_- -34 30-32 _ _ - _ _ .- -36 -34-- i i-\`���\\ 82426 2��_ ON BLOT. �/A /�24 . 0�\`' SULFONATION - _ - -3b - -38- - - - _ - - - -- -- -38- - - / "'' ��=_ --=2 t - BUILDING-- -`� 2B= Lti�_ �, BUILDING c U) o g- -T .� " MAP 16 _ 4 TE; MAP 16 LO 0 0WAREHOUSE p J# 36 , 224 LOT 225 MAP 16 ,Q� ,,; • • z- f ON �' � \` " ` .s %�`'.P .�rs'. N/F 34 N/F OT 227 ;#2 SHED, - - - - - ?6 --22- MAP 16 LOT :76 / j MAP 16 LOT CONLEY TUC ER• N F " 20 �'� ? -�4 - ROBERT G \ 4, / I N/F � '' I 223 I LAWSON I - - - FISH- • •FrOtll. �'\ `^32�.�\\ -/ '�� - co �r S H. FLORES 2 / I 1 I ,32 w -' X- _ �_-. •, L_ / , Nh � - +> GRIFFIN# ;f N F � POND r- -u-- � �3 �AL-C ,�'� \ a�- � � G -i I / I (� \ O_\ - - -+ \ s� #3668VIL 6 MAP 16 A&N REAL I MAP 6 T 2 x o • \\�� �a0�--+--'/ u � T a LOT 222 ESTATE 1 LO 3 GARDE J `� -- - ALL MAP 16 - -' N/F TRUST N/F \38 .-~'""` /'-'� &SIT. CONG. �' '• LOT 220 `v KOHLOFER , / " ' DEMEULE Lx MAP 16 LOT 232 __--/ `� �� #2 P VEMENT �� �1 'r VVI N/F , „ I IMAP 16; n . BLANDEN m ! I , , , I I �C Q LOT 231: a-' I c MYERS ,,, I o "BI T. CO-HC. FAIL#<(�!G ,,. T,,,,,,; CONC. t: MAP 16 /p./G• �Y I Z #44 I I 's .. ,,, I I I N/F #20 I , i I '-'� oI #10 , MAP 16 MAP 16 LON�F35 / E ? R #48 Q i' I I ' ' ' ROSS 1 \ I LOT 234 LOT 380 ESMH1 RIM=10.26 I BIT. I MAP 16 L(OT 2291 ; ,� ,MAP 233 LOT #6 N/F N/F PATTISON INV=3.(38 I J #40 #38 #36 CON C. '#30 N/F v #14F� CSWIGGIN PATTISON / BASIH t SPERIDAKOS ESMH2 -- -- - _ _ _ _ w ❑/ - Itt RIM=11.28 - - = _ _ - - GRAPHIC SCALE INV=5.t3, �, ,� - - �S W- GFZANITE GI�fZE3 BEA VER STREET 40 0 20 40 80 160 2L r Engineering �---D S S , +,� 11RB �..h2� 50 - - (PUBLIC WAY N 30' 14VIDE) Group, LLC - - - - -' - - - - IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. P.0 Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G MAP 16 LOT 242 -o -- I I1'II 4 N/F _ � , /\' B�#3 = Beverly, MA 01915 CALCULATED - o I � --� FLOODWAY LIMIT HARMONY GROVE _ o �� . �1� / /BANK#1i CORPORATION _ o �---- / Tel: 978-927-5111 _ � \ Fax. 978-927-5103 -0 - 25 �-- 0 � � MAP16LOT 378 _ ° 2 W5 ��E ��� --I- (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) _ � - ° SEWER 44,432± SQ. FT - - ° - -� - I 1.02 ACRES l rBANI MRM PROJECT EASEMENT _ - - - ° �\/ �j ROAD - - - H _ -_�! _ ___--- I _ BANK4 - - - MANAGEMENT, LLC R M O N i _ __ I BANK#3 C M --,�•- S E T T . �.-�_,_,_+�-f����-�-, SALEM, MA - MH �� � ' I RANI<#2 M ASSACH . � BANK#1 s MH _ -� VAP 16 LOT 378 _ _-�' _ R R TR ��`;=_ _14 r _16 - - - HARMONY GROVE CORP. .� ti++++ -�- �1 (11 - (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) 10601ER_ _ - '" o� -4_::.- =0i�ir jam-- -22- _ _ P,� _ 12- - - _ -- -- 44,432± SQ. FT �-- 0 R I TY _ \ 1 AUTH .}�31H �� /'I� �'EMA,1Ub YEAR EXISTING _ 1.02 +}}}}i41�+ / _ ��j�'__ FLOOD ZONE �� I�• G4 _ - - TA TION _ - CALCULATED �/ it / /ZONE AE (EL. 10.8) CONDITIONS PLAN _ TIDAL TRANSPOR _ - �� FLOODWAY LIMIT Iz / /�j X24_.... - - - - - _ - - ! - _ - CA AL - - AY _ Q4 I MAP 16 LOT 216 ��.Im s L=1 37.83' - RIVE N B - R �� _ �� I N/F J -- -- �----_i NORTH - - jl USETTSN� l4H�E�H+ _ RAYMONDOr \ / �Q7k5 � a SQL, 1"=40' MAP 86 LOT 135A 1 _ -- - - 4= W- Job No, 700 N/F � -� - - �- '� P 2N/FOT 40 ..�}�r�H-E' � �� _-- ...- \ ``-.. - . SOUTHERN ESSEX -J ��C ` _ � =_ _ C- 2 SEWERAGE DISTRICT -�� MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY - -= ` =- '32- �, F7e Name: p/p/s/n-b - -� CK R R QST At, _gg; 12/20/11 �- _ GRAPHIC SCALE I 40 0 20 40 80 160 EXIST. CURB Cod i _ _ 1 REMOVABLE / \ ( IN FEET ) � � I SB/DH %E) N 1 inch = 40 ft. BOLLARD / (HLD (LI \ 25 WIDE , \ ' / S.E.S.D. SEWERQVMAP 16 LOT 377 \ EASEMENTCjR p (1 HARMONY GROVE RD.) SB/DH \ I \�� 0 909± S FT FND & HLD MAP 16 LOT C PROPOSED HISTORIC HIGH Q\\\� �11 Y r, 50 2 0.48 ACRES , I N/F �� �\ ROADWAY WATER LINE Q P I 50 GROVE STREET RIEAL EST, LLC \ IMPROVEMENTS P1 `� �UgL1C � / I I LAND COURT PLAN 33813A �� �;\ BY CITY at — ' S' IDE T °`x — — / NORTH RIVER CRNA — TIDAL \ HISTORIC HIGH I �AG� �Q �\ S.E.S.D SEWER / / / 010—OL) && METAL WATER LINE I \ '0 �\\ EASEMENT.- BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE REMEDIATION AREA REPAIR EXIST. _ DECK= EL. 9.2± (SEE SHEET C-10) BRIDGE FOR PED./BIKE -� ( \ 1 \,�ti � USE IF PERMITTED I MAP 16 LOT 237 O BY MASSDEP I U 1 m MAP 16 LOT 239 m Q HISTORIC HIGH - _ r� � �` � / I EXISTING = I (60 GROVE STREET)- WATER LINE ~ L / I U W 1 U W (3 HARMONY GROVE RD.) HISTORIC HIGH BRIDGE \ U L j I V �, 26,946 SQ.FT. �9,p� �` \ / n 35,561 SQ.FT. WATER LINE F- W F- W 0.62 ACRES IP-) \ REMEDIATION AREA W F- ABUTMENTS 1 � (SEE SHEET C-10) EXIST. Q =1 Q = 0.82 ACRES \ Q = Q = \ MAP 16 LOT 378 - RAILROAD- - � tnl� tn - - _ - , — , _ - - - - �- -` �- - - � tnl� � _ - _ . - , - . _=- - - - - —=- • - ' - - ==- • - - \ PROPOSED T 5 HARMONY GROVE RD. CROSSING - - _ - - — — �- — — — — — - — ' — • EXISTING LOADING W ( ) EASEMENT PROPosED s' T \ INLAID CONCRETE -0 44,432± SQ. FT _ 1 REMOVABLE I FENCE ALONG TRANSPORTATION TION I AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN \ \ CROSSWALKS AT -� 1.02 ACRES - = BOLLARD R.R. TRACKS _+�I _{ I+H +-H+l \+�` +++� � o ---�- 1 BAY TRACKS `I-N-I-Ff-F +fit- � L-H-H +f-H-H-f-f-H-I-t-i-f-F-I-H-t-�1-��-I-H-H-f"���"1- ENTRANCE (!� PR OS 6' }}}{ I F}} IHHHHHHH +} I , ,_ FENCE ALONG R,R. TRACKS "rr HCH fzrrrm r r rn FH i I 1 F F+E f I H h I H i f-I i FfH+�1 I H I H I f H t I H� H H-I I- REMOVE PROPOSED BRIDGES {�I _ — I PROPOSED 6' d f PROP. BIKE 9 10/16/14 OVER RIVER. WIDEN PATH & TTS CKSL ♦' \\ WESTERLY PARKING LOT FOR �r FENCE ALONG RACK 59.1' -- �� ASSACHU t _ — TRACKS ter:, ; NII I ; n 10' BIT. CONC. PATH URI - \ EMERGENCY EGRESS. ADD 1 M — _ — _ I 2 REMOVABLE kj11 UoTO REMAIN "'� \ FENCE ALONG R.R. TRACKS & "".,�..� _ BOLLARDS F�'-F-,'.- I �( '\ RIVER. REDUCE NO. OF UNITS. �- . U I EXISTING S COMMERC AL \ `" PROPOSED Imo-y� STORAGE SPACE �p \ SHOW GROVE ST STRIP ISLA 1 — �"� � � G '�NI TE 8_ 3.5' FENCE 6� _._ ) ,,� -o , TYP 0 2) _ ' OCA, ��@ AREA ,�� ya \ \ UPDATE�TAB ESN STRIPE © - BULK TRASH / \ FENC ENCLO D a 5' ' RET wq� 1 EXISTING ��, \ \� ISLANDS PER FIRE DEPT. /I \ TR & CYCLI .� "`-- TO I OFFICE 4 g 3,/10/14 '�_ & NC. -E O \ FROM REAR OF 60 GROVE ST. r-- MONITORING STORAGE AREA / I 14 W � I D WELLS 1MTHIN FENCED i / HAND AP B STO GEA A � • — . — , � BI�; CC �.� EL. 9.6 I N BUILDING \� REMOVE PARKING & DUMPSTER -� RA ® TYP CH 8 DING) ' ! p p i 1= (TYP OF 4) ENCLOSURE iI 4 1111" 11 ) E�RG�ENCy �q�N -�� 1� r� VER 7 \ 7 4 25/13 NOTE GRANITE CURBING AT E / ` C (; / ENTRANCES. 1 f N 9 I I P POS B DIN #1 \ �� -h �NAT/0 RgNIT ` �LQL '' \� ADD RELOCATED MATERIAL W AN U ER I ~ / L RET 6 3/11/13 CELL M RELOCATED -'4 \ RE CK - IP TED / `"� ql TO - ADD 1&5 HARMONY GROVE �1 I MATERIAL CELL TU MO ENT ' — ~ OSS LK (4 UNI ) P 40.0' �� PROPOSED E�, 9 _ 5 111/6/12 AREAS TO PLAN GRASS i C7 CP ;i:. -� -� qNl 3.5 FENCE 6 _ — A— M ( ) — —— = I TYP N.O.) CO RETE 1► bV ED I NG °i;« T E 1 j� — -'i \ ( PR OSED UI �_ Q ADD 1&5 HARMONY GROVE S EWAL Gq qG (SND #2 14' Inlq ROAD TO PLAN. RELOCATE PED e \ TYP 2 TYP) i7+1 ( 3_U T R ' BIT C+CN 1- -. TQC( \ BRIDGE. UPDATE TABLES. i_ rjr, -----� ,; I PER UILDI ) I � r & EMERGEN C PATH ., �- ��_-.�•fi+ =,� `�l:1TURE _ O " �_ . ", ., Kc c o R E RAD KE RSE K � ,.. i �• K `•�`� 3 9,/19/12 U R R � C � \ ',ti• .'. .. '.d.„.,..,. ; ,. '> 122.7 `� � ADD ATABLE SOF AREASAL ' - . qNE cRosswA c .. .,. i (SEE NO \ r - a HATCH RES. US • ADJUST RES STOP SIGN & ,, 'a'""� _ _ I _ _ \ ,n ,,, •, .. ,� +c,-•. . P� UILDI ) A LINH �`•'•� ' •• PBI G) SHEET C � � 7,/15/12 H E' S C 2 STOP BAR (TYP) I ,;, ,:, E v. ti + � 2 I • I "''t..,. ,. � g,. •;,.. P OPO � � - IIIIIIIIIIII I I ' BOUNDARY DRIVEWAYALONG UPDBLDG ATE2 &3 9. o ED U y 2 REMOVABLE 1 STON _�_� I �.•., IYP. ;,�• , n. v 1 t; ONCR W� Gq GE I� G 3 ® — — , _/ -' BOLLARDS TABLE. I T. WAS I MAP 16 LOT 236 [\� „�, I ;'•i SIDE LK (4 _U ND 1 6,/20/12 GROVE ST. LAYOUT. UPGRADE MAP 16 LOT 217 (64 GROVE STREET) _ - C "'' ' „ _ I :' ( TS) ISTD C H \ \ +_ ADD MATCH LINES. REVISE so N/F —_ V C� TER INE !' SIDEWALKS & CROSSWALKS. 234,152 SQ.FT. "'•'"'' ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. #12 SARKES I 5.38 ACRES 1 C� "'' PRO CURB[ AT 1 ` SHIFT GROVE ST. ENTRANCE. i . a.,,r, WIDEN VEHICLE BR #6 V ` c 1 (TYPay H BRIDGE. — — — -, DD BIKE RACKS. BPD DISTRICT _ BP DIS •1- � >y SILVER L — - - MAP 16 LOT 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIL — — - - — —I— — — — — — = N i NjTF- R2 DISTRICT I f �'` _ 2 DI RIC o I No. Date Description (PUBLIC WAY 16. I P -► FLORES I eve Z c.n -r--. MAF1 16 LOT M P ,1,�, s 4 o ;# IN2 F LOT 225 MAP 16 ,, I CRoss AT �\ I / '#34 N/F OT 227 #78 SHED SHED I 30 ENTR C STOP SIGN zE MAP 16 LO'T 76 I C NILE I TUC ER- N F PROP. AND STOP i / tet ' MAP 16 LOT / 1 = RESIDENTIAL SPACE I m N F I 223 I I — _ - - (146,855 SF) / 2 I I #32, LAWSON I — - -� FLORES # Qti I N/F 1 I I ' L r MAP 16 A&N R I WALL ,� LOT 222 ESTATE L I I ( ALL I ..ry sp MAP 16 r MAP 16 LOT 23 I PROPOSED , NOTES: LOT 220 f KOHLOFER TRUST - I DEMEULE /-- �y r.� 2 G R U .. .. 1 _�_,./ I ® # ROADWAY I RRNERT �- MAP 16 LOT 232 IMPROVEMENTS P� GRIFFIN -i 1 REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES I N/F o ' I I IIviAP 16' N F 1 BIT. CONC. PARKING BY CITY CIVIL AND LEGEND. 44 I MYERS , , LOTo �4 BLANDEN ,. I ,,, , f I Q Q LOT 231 . / 1 MAP 16 / Iss�ss I I I I I Ross #20 „I„ I L I #10 MAP 16 S 35 _ Iln1mF �c\ # > Q f ( ; MAP 16 LOT 380 N F 4'17 Ste. I I ' #24 j 1 y ' PAR ING MAP 16 LOT" # LOT 234 N/F ( PATTISON i r ,3 � L' #40 #38 I #36 F31T. #30 MAP 16 LOT X29 I I (8± SPICES 233 6 N/F i � OONC. N F ) ►: PATTISON i � !f 1 BASH #1 N..,F :,11CSWIGGIN ._Lj — — — — — — — — — — — — I' SPERIDAKOS _� _ GRANIIE `��B BEA VER S TREE T GRAN. — — — ZONING CHART j I POST 30 WIDE:) ■ REQUIRED - - I (PUBLIC WAY N FND ' PER PUD PROVIDED - - MIN. LOT AREAS 60,000 SF 362,000 SF Grinin MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100' 161 .37' FOOTNOTES: _ En ineerin MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 ' 1) REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. GRAPHIC SCALE � g g 2)1 LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD _ Group, LLC MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5% SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. 40 0 20 40 eo iso _ - MAP 16 LOT 242 __� I _ MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 39.4% 3)1 MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. N/F —_ - _ _ - - -cc P.O Box 7061 MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1 ' SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. HARMONY GROVE _ - _ - - — I 1 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6; 4 1 216 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE ( IN FEET ) CORPORATION — _ Beverly MA 01915 MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0 (1 .67 SP/UNIT). 11 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE 1 inch = 4o ft. ` _ - _ - _ _ _ — MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15' BUILDING. _ ' WIDE pISTRICS _ _ - — �-.-- 25 R1 _ — — _ _ --�" __-- -- � 'T Tel: 978-927-5111 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 4 5) LOT AREA INCLUDES #1 & #5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. _ _ _ SEWER _ _ _ - - �DRI� — _ —�� — — 1 _lo Fax: 978-927-5103 MIN. PARKING -- 216 0 n D _ - OVER - ' _ _ --- HARM GR _ _ - - - - — _ _ — — 1 �1� MRM PROJECT HAR _ - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ — - _ _ — __- _ - 1 1� MANAGEMENT, LLC KS SALEM, MA MAP 16 LOT 378 (5 HARMONY GROVE RD.) - - J pIS1RICT � �-� y - - - - - - - - _ _ 44,432± SQ. FT — - QR� TY - I -i Co ` �dtiuc - - -� — —__ 1.02 ACRES _ - A U T� I E{I AFI r � ��R2 STRICT i I= _ _ OVERALL - - RTATION � � ; I� —c — _--- _ TIDAL TRANSPO _ _ — _ — • Iz SITE LAYOUT — — — — — _-- CANAL Y �}I �IF�i�i4�Fi_ _ — — —_ _ —i— MAP 16 LOT 216 I m _ - A NOR RIVER - _ USETTS BE��I+�� �t � - - _ - TABLE OF RESIDENTIAL SPACE RAYMOND ��I � PLAN -`— �—_' - _ SSACH _ _ _ _ - _ M M��I44VFfF';1 - LOT AREA RESIDENTIAL NON-RES. �� MAP 86 LOT 135A __ _ +,H+�H +� H � USE AREA USE AREA o``--- Som 1'=40' N/F ��-- --- — MAP 26 LOT 40 � + '"` ' �I�� .. — n' 60 GROVE STREET 26,946 SF 0 SF 26,946 SF SOUTHERN ESSEX _ N/F {-I-WW+44 M SEWERAGE DISTRICT _ _ � CKS MASS BAY TRANS AUTHORITY —� _ - \0 64 GROVE STREET 234,152 SF 142,456 SF 91 ,696 SF I m • 700 R.R. TKA _ - �_ - - 70\� 1 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 20,909 SF 0 SF 20,909 SF Job No,OWN I 3 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 35,561 SF 0 SF 35,561 SF e s h-bC- 3 � BOUND _ - ni Name P�P� 5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 44,432 SF 0 SF 44,432 SF I TOTAL 362,000 SF 142,456 SF 219,544 SF I D� 12/20/11 I ------- ------ MAP 16 LOT 237 . M i Q HISTORIC HIGH \\ CURBING NOTES: ( 60 GROVE STREET) \ 1) CURBING IN PUBLIC WAY TO BE GRANITE. WA TE R LINE 2) CURBING ON SITE TO BE PORTLAND _ �-- 26 , 946 S Q. FT. \ \ CEMENT CONCRETE. c� wlvw w 0. 62 ACRES \ \ � � --T — - — - — - — - — — — — — _, — , — . —, —. — , — . — , — , — • — • — _ \ PROPOSED EXISTING LOADING INLAID CONCRETE AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN \ \ \ CROSSWALKS AT R . R . TRACKS ENTRANCE ` _#I �Illliilllll PROP. BIKE PROPOSED 6' � .� ¢ RACK � ' ' ".1: , � G FENCE ALONG ' , I TRACKS 59 . 1 � \, \ � y: \ � O , Z , ( TO REMAIN ...o. \ EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL \ g• �� STORAGE SPACE) �o Z AREA EXISTING 'J� 7 2 \ \ OFFICE 4 \ 9. 60/5) BUILDING \ � /V \ Tj� 7 --�-__ R/ —I. CA /V11 L GRAN/ \ � TL o /� � \ A �L \ �- PROPOSED TO __ -- 40. 0 E — — _� A N J TE B 3.5 FENCE '•,.•• �O CK �t — --"" •_.._ -�' �� 4 10/16/14 REMOVE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN RET — BRIDGE OVER RIVER. WIDEN VV �") \` PATH FOR EMERGENCY EGRESS. � 4• � 4 T. � A � T `�� � ._ __-.�� ADD FENCE ALONG R.R. C0NC• O V�/ \ `},� ---\` TRACKS & RIVER. REDUCE NO. =M ER G P T EL OF UNITS. SHOW GROVE ST. EN A ! �� 1'" �`. 6 -� �` FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION WORK. ADD _'- GROVE STREET CROSSWALK NOTE: P POSE C Y -- -- \ GROVE ST. CROSSWALK. =N CROSSWALK OWNER TO COORD ORK K E R K (NATE CROSSWALK W 3 3/10/14 REMOVE PARKING & DUMPSTER '' — WITH THE CITY OF SALEM AT TIME OF FROM REAR OF 60 GROVE ST. M1 . EKE (TYP F 2 (SEE NOTE IGH 12 . 7 �� CONSTRUCTION. PER CITY CONSULTANT, ENOTE NTRANCENITE CURBING AT IN P B;U I L G 1, THIS SHEET) CITY TO CONSTRUCT CROSSWALK. GRANITE 1 10112 2 4/25/13 -" ) 1 CURBS AND SIDEWALKS AT CROSSWALK TO / / RELOCATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. "�"'I "I ADD RAMPS. P ... o - - IIIII� BE RECONSTRUCTED. ADD STRIPING AND Eo SIGNAGE (MUTCD W1 1 -2 & W16-2p) AT No Date Description 2 REMOVABLE BOTH SIDES OF CROSSWALK. I � V1/� � �L N G — � � _ , Revisions ON CR A G 3 — BOLLARDS `.r.: SIDEW LK E No : (TY TS) IST I C H H ` ` \ REMOVABLE BOLLARD NOTE: I� �- OWNER TO PROVIDE REMOVEABLE BOLLARDS TER INE , . •fy• ���., WHERE INDICATED ON SITE LAYOUT PLAN. PROVI GRA TE . BOLLARDS TO BEE MODEL NO. MCSP—SSI —Uq !`" 4 # t��ROBERT % L BY MAXIFORCE. BOLLARDS TO HAVE TWO CURBI AT \ SIDED LOCKING PIN FOR TWO PARTY ENTRY. " "* n � Ire GRIFFIN OBTAIN LOCK SETS FROM FIREDEPARTMENT �' -1-L . L ® ® TRAN (TYP \ ti:asc�� #sssss FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ENTRY. V ',r,p, °�'' V — BP — DIS — — - - 2 DI RIC N �' 4 C; Grirrin _ OPOS \ Engineering y. N C T - N C 0 E \ � Group, LLC CROSS S AT �' �\� � I 30. EN TR C � � \\ P.O Box 7061 STOP SIGN 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G PROP. AND STOP I \\ Beverly, MA 09915 FENCE BAR \ Tel: 978-927-5911 WALL ( \ Fax: 978-927-5103 ALL I \ MRM PROJECT PROPOSED \ MANAGEMENT, LLC 16 LOT 232 #2ROADWAY SALEM , MA BI N F I T. CONC. PARKING , 7 IMPROVEMENTS r / MAP 16 BY CITY MYERS L #10 �' � " LOT 235 MAP 16 / --\ I MAP 16 N /F PAR I N G MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 LOT 380 PATTI SON i SITE LAYOUT#6 N /F233 N F( 8± SP CES) PLAN #1 CSWIGGIN PATTISON SPERIDAKOS — ____ GRAPHIC SCALE ii Scale: 1� 20 0 10 20 40 80 EETM M r -1 E3 �/� / Job No, 700 EA VER S TR / / ( IN FEET ) File Name: p/p/SA-b C- 3 A /I/A Y 3 0 WIDE) / �/ 1 inch = 20 ft. (PUBLIC V V I Q9#C 6/20/12 i 1 HARMONY GROVE RD . -TSB DH \ 20 909 _ SQ. FT - + FND & HLD , 1 0. 48 ACRES a — NOR11TH' CANAL-----.RIVER TIDALHISTORIC HIGH wooD & METAL ,E I .� BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE REMEDIATION AREA WATER LINE DECK— EL. 9.2± (SEE SHEET C-10) � 1 " I UI I M MAP 16 LOT 239 m Q 3 HARMONY GROVE RD . EXISTING = I— � ) HISTORIC HIGH � F— = F— U w I U w 35, 561 SQ. FT. BRIDGE C� w I U w — w1 �— Ld WATER LINE ABUTMENTS ~ W �" w Q = Q = 0. 82 ACRES < = I Q .2 V) PROPOSED 6 MOVABLE I FENCE ALONG TRANSPOR TA ARD 13A Y TRACKS TT 1'—I I I—Ii� �-H--f- -1 ' H i-t+++H-H-1-'I- !, 10 BIT. CONC. PATH 2 REMOVABLE TE gLO -- _ BOLLARDS CK _ ALL PROPOSED EL. 6 NI TE 3.5' FENCE ' REMOVE�' '" -- 4 10/16/14 BRIDGE OVER PRIVER.OSED PWID WIDEN �� '" ` 0 CK __� PATH FOR EMERGENCY EGRESS. FEN C EN CLO ED RET. I ADD FENCE ALONG R.R. •••''h .• TR H 8C CYCLI 5 - ' '`--���� �' ORAUN TS. RIVER. REDUCE NO. HAND AP I B ST01 GE A A 4 e� _ _ I F _ L• J 3 9/12/14 SEE SHEET C-3. R A S ® TYP ,C H B DING s O' V _� 6-� I REMOVE PARKING & DUMPSTER \ n PA T -- - 2 3/10/14 FROM REAR OF 60 GROVE ST. /1 /� 1 ENCY 1 3/11/13 ADD REMEDITAION AREA No Date Description Z. P POS B DIN #1 -� W AR E U ER ' ' �_ I _ Revisions IP TED OSS LK ( 4 UNI (TYP .N.0.) opSED 1 PR OSED CO RETE W (��� B E RA G� ANG •' s ' S EW #2 A L GE U . , ��� 2 ) _ D Q "., ROBERT TYP TYP / \ fir: 'c� H, m 'vim ,• I PER UILDI ) 3 1 TS h, ���o GRIFFIN e CI`✓IL . PR O S E D E °°�� sss$s k� A :. ,..• (TYP 2 HIS RIC IGH •' I PER UILDI ) ATE LIN ••h' i• Gfirrin Engineering Group, LLC V P.O Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G Beverly, MA 01915 17 Tel: 978-927-5111 V L Fax: 978-927-5103 V 10 _ MRM PROJECT 1 MANAGEMENT, LLC 16 . r , SALEM, MA J MAI 16 LOT MAP 1224 LOT 225 MAP 16 N/F X34 N/F LOT 227 , SHEDSITE LAYOUT T C NLEY I TUCKER N /F #28 I PLAN I LAWSON I #32GRAPHIC SCALE IISca e' 1'=20' I I 20 o io 20 40 so115 Ell Job N • 700 1 MAP 16 LOT 230 1 C— 38 N /F ( IN FEET ) File Name: p/p/S/h—b 1777-77 D E M E U LE � I I inch = 20 ft.MAP 16 LOT 232 Dli% s/2o%2 _- T EXIST. , CURB CUT . ` 1 REMOVABLE ,_,.- . gym" BOLLARD,., / .. GF07 X10 HISTORIC HIGH ,g WATER LINE 0 VA 25 WIDE NORITH R1 V S. E. S. D . SEWER WOOD & METAL EASEMENT..- / / BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE DECK— EL. 9.2± REPAIR EXIST. BRIDGE FOR PED. BIKE USE IF BY MASSDEPITTED ( 3 1 ,. �• vwlvw 1d REMEDIATION AREA s MAP 16 LOT 378EXIST. 0 ~ W �_. � � (SEE SHEET C-10) RAILROAD ; z Q = j Q = _ — . C n � V) I � V)• - - . — . — CROSSING — , — ----- - ( 5 HARMONY GROVE RD . ) —� + EASEMENT EN T -° _ -0 44, 432_ SQ . FT _ y QD — 1 REMOVABLE _ � 1 . 02 ACRES — — _ _ BOLLARD — I � ' I 5 10/16/14 REMOVE PROPOSED VEHCILE PROPOSED 6 TRACKS jI-I -tI BRIDGE OVER RIVER. WIDEN --� — FENCE ALONG R ,�� . II -I-+ �-I I +-1�I�I�T I EMERGENCY EGRESS.WESTERLY PARKING LOT ADD FENCE ALONG R.R. TRACKS & TR C K S I RIVER. REDUCE N0. OF UNITS. EU S ++ I � � 4 9/12/14 SEE SHEET C-3. SS F V A .teOE", I ENTRANCE. TENDBTO TRACKS 3 . AT 2 4/25/13 X ADD REMEDITAION AREA AND .► w — 1 3/11/13 RELOCATED MATERIAL CELL No Date Description _ Ir STRIP IS Revisions _- M TYP 0 2) BULK TRASH MONITORING STORAGE AREA / I �n WELLS WITHIN FENCED I HAND ` AP G 4. TYP OF 4 ENCLOSURE Iyf RoBRT `y � ( ) 1 I � 4 RA S Io GRIFFIN G v ' 1 P i g a � ` 36656 \�k2s' II D P `yT`' MAP 16 LOT 216 RELOCATED 1 I 1 N /F MATERIAL CELL i IRE T CK I = IP TED n� MOV ENT — OSS LK RAYMOND (GRASS) 1 TU (TYP N.0.) 1 I � Gntrin 1 2 Engineering ` �- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Grou , LLC _ 00 Cummings Center Suite 224 � O6 _ y eve STOP SIGN & � '''�'.,; r .�: Beverly, MA 09995 STOP BAR (TYP) I Tel. 978-927-5111 Fax: 978-927-5903 S7 I s ET w� I MAP 16 LOT 236 MRM PROJECT MAP 16 LOT 217 �� MANAGEMENT, LLC ( 64 GROVE STREET) N/F 234 SALEM, MA SARKES I , 152 SQ. FT. X12 I — 5. 38 ACRES 6 =4 SITE LAYOUT MAP 16 LOT 218 BPD DISTRICT PLAN SIL l/ N/F R2 DISTRICT GRAPHIC SCALE ALE (PUBLIC WAY FLORES SQQ1% 1'=20' 20 0 10 20 40 8q Job No, 700 ( IN FEET ) He Name: P/P/S/h—b C- 3C MAI 16 LOT 1 inch = 20 ft. i #4 �� - 6/20/121224 I ' I - - ' \\ SOIL TEST PIT DATA (10/17/11) -SEE SHEET C-48- �' Q TP-1 (EL. 15.9) DEPTH HORIOTHERZON ION TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH 80-120 C1 S 10YR 5/4 SINGLE-GRAIN, LOOSE, VARIES ACROSS PIT vwI U w1 nn� p \ NO UPP REFUSAL, N0120E�EPING, NO MOTTLES ROOTS TO 108 Q = Q = LIMIT OF WORK/ TP-2 (EL. 17.6) 12u) I :2cn DISTURBANCE S DEPTH H ORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER (-- (� - s; \ 0-54 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH I \ 54-64 A FLS lOYR 3/2 GRANULAR \ 64-74 B LS 7.5YR 6/6 FRIABLE, BLENDS WITH A LAYER AUTHORITY O�-a TEMPORARY� 74-120 C1 S 1 OYR 4/4 MED. SAND, VARIES ACROSS PIT �� � � � R R . TRACKS NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES !-H SILT SACKS ESHWT: <7.6 (>120") I+H �-�-{-}-f - (TYP 0 F 4 C B) �.. TP-3 (EL. 17.3) �f-1-1-�-1- O DEPTH �I ETH HORIZON TEXTURE COLO MOTTLES � OTHER X �I H P x , - n 0-24 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH ®ECB16 24-36 A B F 1 OYR ����� t� C � �� 9x5 , G 36-120 C1 S S 10YR 34 4 GRANULAR ® 9X0 D �_ / MED. SAND, 1 0• T77J D DMH 1 1 \ �� NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES �XU �-- _ D O ESHWT: <7.3 (>120") EROSION CB17 ® Z_ NOTE: SOIL TESTS PERFORMED BY: J. BLANCHETTE, P.E. ON 10/17/11 I CONTROLS Bc � � j \ _�► v LIMIT OF WORK 9x0 O �s y �\ SOIL TEST PIT DATA (4/11/12) EXISTING I S T N G S \ TP-2A (EL. 18.0) n _ DISTURBANCE . 6 �- -�- " _ STORAGE �� DEPTH HORIZON TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER '� / W S5 D ,` W 0-78 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH Q QD u 78-120 C1 S 1OYR 4/4 SINGLE-GRAIN LOOSE VARIES ACROSS PIT ;. ® ® AREA EXISTING /\ NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES 1=5.05 \ \ Q ESHWT: <8.0 (>120") OFFICE 9x5 TP-3A EL. 1 . 9. 6ORBUILDING PROP. OUTFALL �� \ y DEPTH HORIZON 5) TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLES OTHER �- - I � T \ a Z_ 0-60 FILL -- -- SANDY GRAVEL, RI / STRUCTURE 1 \ BRICKS, LITTLE TRASH P \ (� � � 60-72 A/B LS 7.5YR 6/6 FRIABLE, BLENDS WITH A LAYER '��, IPE INV.=4.0 \ �0 72-120 C1 S 1 OYR 4/4 MED. SAND, POCKETS OF COARSE SAND 1� \ � NO REFUSAL, NO WEEPING, NO MOTTLES -�` ® m CA GeAN/ � 9x6 (SEE DETAIL) 6 ,; � V jq AN� ! OLX ESHWT: <7.5 (>120") 11DAL 0�'! -�- D/\ R� - - it /--\ PERC. TEST #1 @ TP-2A ® � �Q PERC. RATES: 1.7 MPI, DEPTH OF PERC = 90" �Q OX� �� 1' �_� `\ 7 10/16/14 REVISE DRAINAGE ON 60 GROVE ST. & OMIT OUTFALL 4. -�_ �� PERC. TEST #2 @ TP-3A REVISE OUTFALL #1 AND ® ® C EL, 9• __II ____ f PERC. RATES: 3.3 MPI, DEPTH OF PERC = 96" ADJUST WEIR MANHOLE. Rq NI ]� = Ner\ � \\ 6 3/10/14 REMOVE PARKING & BASIN �O ,,,A `� NOTE: SOIL TESTS PERFORMED BY: J. BLANCHETTE, P.E. ON 4/11/12FROM REAR OF 60 GROVE ST. c+ \ -'` 512/30/13REMOVE BLSF COMPENSATORY am FLOOD STORAGE AREAS. REVISE RE T y,, ' ►�i� � 1l� PATH GRADING & NOTE 3. ®E� TO PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE TW-22.0 v \; -) =\f \ ADD BLSF COMPENSATORY _ `_ 4 7/5/13 FLOOD STORAGE AREAS. NV.-1- 2.0 R�_� -_ E - 0 9• 9 \ CB5 DMH5 5 � MH DMH11 °_ ' .a NEW PRECAST REVISE STORMWATER ,• y, RLQ_ B21 `".�''- \ RIM=19.00 RIM=15.40 � C -'�� p�_ ` ` ` Q \ RIM 15 40 TREATMENT DEVICES. I` ® ` l BASIN & DRAIN INV.-16.00 I(in)=9.43 18" I(in)=5.50 12" D DMH7B .--�,, ® ® ' MANHOLD BY CITYl(in)=12.20(( ) ) In - )" ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA "--�__: -- „ » 3 3/11/13 TW==21 .0 RL_ - _ �'1� \ - CB 6 12 ) I(' t)=5. 12 LINES. I(in)=12.20 (12") I(out)=5.40 (12 ) 2 10/1/12 RELOCATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. / R -- _ _ � -- \ � RIM-9.55f RIM-15.25 ADD RAMPS. 21,X'`5' L� -� I(in)=12.20 (s )�� 1 9/10/12 ADD LIMIT OF WORK - p `---'\ X INV.=12.25 " ,1 / ,F RL \ \ I(out)=9.33 (18 ) YD2 6DISTURBANCE LINE. ' O O��S 0 _ RIM=20.75 No Date Description ?r ROP. 8 0 l� li' 4 IM="14.00 DMH6 INV.=11.50 rj ED BUIL PROP. 8"o � _ DMH7A ���� _ J z NV.=11.00 RIM=14.40 ~ ROOF LEADER \ W/ DING \ x - I(in)=8.95 (18") YD4 12" Revisions 1 .5% SLOPE ARq GE 3 ROOF LEADER Q C816&17 I(in)=10.60 (12") RIM=16.00 .f.: � U � �\ � � � LIMIT OF _ NDER 1 % SLOPE � -� INV.-12.70 Y � I(out)=8.85 (18")� TO DMH3 (43RIM=9.00 UNIT TO DMH7B \ �� ' WORK/ INV.=6.00 ®w s2 • �_� / q G _ S) I 'RD1 �`- �� �, \ DISTURBANCE DMH7A 5'0 M - �: / �I �-� R G_ \ \ (6 0 DOWNSTREAM •,. ,�`� RL 2� Y = �/ � 0 / � C618&22 (BYPASS- WEIR MH) �r PRO 6"� o �� OMITTED DEFENDER) X ,M1 , h _ RL / � F�� J� RIM=10.50 = , i. s �� h . Q P i WEIR-7.25 ,. % s �V �., IM 9 75 `'''� ' ' '.•,,,..,.,< ,RL.._ ROOF LEADER LMP \ \ CB21 I(in)=7. (1s") I(in)=6.00 (12 ) raM1 r► \ T ORARY t o CON STR_UE ON ] RIM=9.00 10 I(out)=7.00 (12") ROBERT MIN. 1 .5% SLOPE . \ H /``s o I(in)=8.00 (6 ) , H- P I 5 1 N CES INV.=6.00 I(out)=7.00 (12") RIFFI m G N ENTRANCE-- I(out)=7.00 18" 20 �-�- ® ® TO DMH5 _ \ �� ` TRD1 ( ) ®WQS53 sas <!� x82 I \-� -114 R i (4 0 FIRST DEFENSE) �o L H 6 u TRENCH DRAIN) k� ;.- \ _ - _ - c _ ( M1 DMH7B 5'0 MH C-LEANOUT :. , ,� 'r..,.RL ' \ j RIM=10.95 (- --) = 2" M _ _ J O \ RIM 9 30 RL C�-� - I(in) 5.25 (1 ) D -� -'18 � (TYPICAL) ;•, ,' ,,• : 7.; � � O v / p INV.=10.40 I(in)=6.50 (8») I(out)=5.25 (12") D O` O O I \ �D - M1 ' L B6 = v g v o �� ` \ DMH4 I(in)=5.50 (12") D 22- --C-B __�--- [ �', RIM=19.20 1)<,30 TW=28. 4 - 20 D ---- D _.�, I(in)=6.50 (12 ) ��D D j� O I(in)=12.25 (18") I(in)=6. (18") - D C7� - - := -D� \ D O /� G r IC r' �•\ I(in)=15.88 (12") I(out)=4.020 (24") 17 4 - - H - - ) .,. DM -_. 0x W-20 0 CB7 T-., �\ `� l(out)=12.15 (18' TW 22.0 w., ' Gri ma"n ' - , • .', •1 P.,. •, r. � 4 q 1 I ti �� �- .5(y�- e-- ��- � ., _ 1- -x.5,0 - \_ *YD4 TO BE 4'0 MANHOLE WITH 2' SUMP AND BEEHIVE GRATE Engineering NEENAH MODEL NO. R-4340-C YQ 4 � �� � ( ) Group, LLC P.O Box 7061 '`�-� •�'' +11 �� S H,ALL 0 W -\ -\6� \ 2 2 �� \ PIPE SCHEDULE 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G 200' SWALE ~ �� ~2� ✓ �--- � - \ \ I TEMPORARY \ \ PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE Beverly, MA 01915 37 DRQ INow - - � ' \ SILT SACKS \ \ DMH3 to DMH4 166.8' 18"0 1.5% \ \ a '��`° �� � � \-- N � \ S \ Tel: 978-927-5111 N N \ (TYP OF 4 CB)� \ CB5 to DMH4 5.9' 12"0 2.0% Fax: 978-927-5103 ETAINING WAL4 \ _ i �i� o \ -_\ \ „ E ALONG TOP ° '3 \ \ \ I 1 \ DMH4 to DMH5 181.2 18 1.5% PPRO - I \ CB6 to DMH5 2.6' 12"0 2.0% AIL, SHEET CJ7) LIMIT OF-1GEOGRID REQ D o \ �-- ALL \, \ MRM PROJECT �- YD4 to DMH5 26.0 12 � 2.0% E IMI TION IN WALLS GREATE 3��- LIMIT OF WORK/ NOTES: MANAGEMENT, LLC DMH5 to DMH6 15.3 18 0 2.5% ` 16 LOT 232 THAN 11 EXPOSED \'�tl- DISTURBANCE #2 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TO BE CAPABLE OF SALEM, MA N F I BIT. CONIC. PARKING HEIGHT / // / / SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. CB7 to DMH6 20.0' 12"0 2.0% / / I ° / 2) DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING M PERS I MAP 1 6 CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE DMH6 to DMH7A 56.3' 18"0 3.1% LIMIT OF WORK/ I ; ; LOT 235 / PROVIDED FOR PERMITTING ONLY. TRD1 to DMH7A 35.0' 6"se 6.9% 4TURBANCE #10 / 0 3) STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM BUILDING 1, 2 & THE I ° MAP 16 MAP 16 N F / SOUTHWESTERLY QUARTER OF BUILDING 3 ROOF IS TO BE PIPED DMH7A to WQS2 11.0' 12"0 9.0% LOT 380 / / THROUGH ROOF LEADERS TO THE INFILTRATION FIELD (DMH3). GRADING, DRAINAGE & MAP 16 LOT LOT 234 P ATTI SON CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING DMH7A to DMH7B 11.6 18 8.6% 233 #6 N F N /F DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. WQS2 to DMH7B 8.8' 12"0 5.7% EROSION CONTROL / 4) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PLAN #1 , F CSWIGGIN PATTISON _ AT PROPOSED GROVE STREET ENTRANCE. C621 to DMH7B 53.3' 12"� 0.9% 11 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. DMH7B to OF#1 9.0' 24"0 2.2% SPERIDAKOS - , GRAPHIC SCALE CB16 to DMH11 97.4 12"0 0.5% Sri 1•_20' 20 0 10 20 40 e0 CB17 to DMH11 4.0' 12"0 12.5% ETSTRE 77� DMH11 to WQS5 31.8' 12"0 0.5% Job No, 700 p ( IN FEET ) WQS5 to (E)MH 20.0' 12"4 1.0% File e• p/p/s/h-b C- 4 A WAY '"13EA VER 3� WIDE) I inch = 20 tL _ (PUBLIC NOTE - ALL PPE DRAIN I RCP.PES TO BE CORRUGATED Die• 6/20/12 \I 12" VC \ PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE 12 VC OUTFALL \ \ CB1 YD3 12" * 0 DMH12A (4' SQ.) OUTFALL 1=5.3± ' RIM=20.80 RIM=25.50 (BYPASS WEIR MH) I I 1=4.3± \ \ ' INV.=17.80 INV.=14.50 RIM=10.20 . \NK#7 ' C6WEIR=6.712 DMH1 I(in)=6.10 (24") \ RIM=20.80 RIM=21.00 \ INV.=17.80 I(in)=17.30 (12") I(out)=6.05 (12") I(in)=6.00 (12") C63 I(in)=17.65 (12") I(out)=6.00 (24") ' \ RIM=20.00 I(out)=17.20 (12 ) RI VER CANAL 1 I DA L ' INV.=17.00 DMH12B (5NORITH tNH DMH2 RIM=10.80 CB4 RIM=20.20 I(in)=4.35 (24") WOOD & METAL RIM=19.80 I(in)=15.90 (12") / I(in)=16.90 (12") I(in)=4.35 (1(")„) BRIDGE W/ 8 PIPE EROSION CONTROLS DECK= EL. 9.2± INv.=1s.8o I(out)=4.25 24 I(out)=15.80 (15") & LIMIT OF WORK - _ - - / ' C131 2&13 DMH13 _ -=_ _ - --- - - DISTURBANCE �, - - - - - - - INV.=7.00 R MH 20 43 (5r3 RIM=4.6 on „ I(in)=4.60 F �� v ��� '"j� I�I f�\• ' --- -- -. I(in)=15.10 (15 ) I(out)=4.50 CO - - - - � �4\\ CB20 I(in)=15.00 (8") 1 ' ��`�-� - \ c0i Q RIS_9 0 I(in)=15.00 (10") v BAN 71 -7- 9-AW - _ \ �/ c ' IN 6. I(out)=13.10 (12")** (4'0 FIRST DEFENSE) BANK#1 EXISTING F-- YD1 6" �` �.. � ~ (out)=14.75 (18") RIM=20.30 RIM=21.75 * TO INFIL. FIELD /3\ ( ) (15") Wvw BRIDGE W INV.=12.75 I(in)=16.45 (12" wW Lj DMH10 50 � l(out)=15.15=15.15 (15" ABUTMENTS 0.15 )l _Q < = Q YD2 6 (in)16.25 (24") WQS3 RIM 20.75 INV.=11.50 I(in)=6.90 (12") (6'0 DOWNSTREAM t I(in)=6.90 (12") 4 DEFENDER) - PROP. OUTFALL �- I I(out)=6.15 (24��) RIM-10.25 I(in)=5.05 (12") AIN EXIST. \ \ EROSION CONTROLS & STRUCTURE #2 I(out)=6.05 (12") f- LIMIT OF WORK/ DISTURBANCE PIPE INV.-4.10 TRANSPORTATION E ALONG PATH \--� �� YD3 TO BE 4'0 MANHOLE WITH 2' SUMP AND BEEHIVE GRATE ' t-t I � WI1 A� I I I � (NEENAH MODEL N0. R-4340-C) 1 1W IT ' - PIPE SCHEDULE _. _ _ � -= _ - -= - - -�1_ -�� %0\ \ .� TOP O PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE - ` _ - _ 10X8 �\ \ \ - COASTAL ' C61 to DMH1 98.6' 12"0 0.5% x7b7 I ® \ R'��� 7 - ® � BANK I CB2 to DMH1 7.4 12"0 2.0% E BLOB _ - �.�,� E -___ DMH1 to DMH2 131.8' 120 1.0% CB12 4 \\ PLUG ALL EXIST. _®`' Op WQS3 \ �� • I�/�A ® � ' ( CB3 to DMH2 5.4' 12"0 2.0% 6 10/16/14 REVISE OUTFALL #2 & WEIR _ _ DMH1_0 k DIS_ 2� \ OUTFALLS �L T i _ ___ _ ® L MANHOLE HP _ 1_ _ ; , \ ALLS Q DMH2 to WQS1 66.5 15 0 1.0% REMOVE PARKING & BASIN -� -- ®' [ FROM REAR OF 60 GROVE ST. 11 x �"1 p �p p D D \ ALONG CANAL WALL. EL, 9 - 5 3/10/14 D p f p 1 �, ® - GRA N ' , C64 to WQS1 17.8' 12"0 2.0% 4 2/30/1 REMOVE BLSF COMPENSATORY 77 CB13� DMH12A x 1 \ - TE FLOOD STORAGE AREAS. REVISE /-- ✓ y� \ � ® p O fes' WQS1 to DMH3 3.2' 15"� 1.5% PATH GRADING & NOTE 3. 11x3 \ __ _�®� ► \ R ' INCREASE WQS3 SIZE. \ \ 1 D M H\13 �� ® T �� a DMH3 to DMH4 166.8 18"0 1.5% ADD BLSF COMPENSATORY e \ L L 3 7/5/13 Q C� 0---_,J- ® � - ---� TO ' DMH9 to DMH10 166.4' 24"0 0.5% FLOOD STORAGE AREAS. REVISE STORMWATER / \ N ® 1 TREATMENT DEVICES. \� '�G1 ® _-� EL. C� J CB12 to DMH10 11.2 12 0.9% 13x0 \_____ .... - --'111 11x5 j ® _--�= ' 2 3/11/13 ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA O �� .�-- ® CB13 to DMH10 1.8 12 0 5.6% 12 X0 \ \ \ \ �C - '`" - -� - „ 1 9/10/12 ADD LIMIT OF WORK/ DMH10 to DMH12A 5.0 24"0 1.0% DISTURBANCE LINE. \ DMH12A to WQS3 5.8 12" No Date Description ' / \ CB20 �� ® ® � 17.2% PROPOSED BUILDING #1 ' TW=23.0 / �` _ -� � _ � WQS3 to DMH12A 5.0' 12"� 1.0% \ _ � Revisions W GARAGE UNDER / DMH12A to DMH12B 82.3' 24"0 2.0% I ; CB20 to DMH13 139.2 12"0 1.0% PR \ ( 43- UNITS) INV.=13.0 - _ _O � 1 •' - - DMH13 to DMH12B 12.5 12"0 1.2% TW�23.0 G IR G= 13. 0 ` / OSE _ TW=22. D BU I 4''' DMH12B to OF#2 7.8' 24"0 1.9% 'Jn , A 1L D ' NOTE ALL DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED FF= 23. 0 CLEANOUT �. / GAR G GE PLASTIC PIPE OR RCP. TYPICAL D ---L UND E�; Fes' ROC ( ) p (43- ER .gyp ; � _ \ UN :.. 3 YD 1 �' PROP. 10"� D S TW=22.0 GRIFFIN J INV.=12.0e ,ch�o x0 ROOF LEADER D \ '--e_ RSL RL R ® RL RL RL RLQ 1 �7,SLOPE D . .. ' . •., 4'. � 1 x j � 12. 0 `� K"r5`:21;X �\ ?2x45 X x � 7 �, ��-25 .h. , 5 It HP OX,3 V 6- Grinin �� C B 1 D D p - -18 \ x \ R� Y0 E ogine ng D HI_ - - - _ ----��� ®�7 \ x "r -20- - p '--� - - - \ �p - (�� P.0 Box 7061 X22 _ \ \ p p�H� 14- � x 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G \ 2 - WQS' ~`' Beverly, MA 01915 22- - - - . � -21 � P� r----_ �- =---D 1= B B 12"x18 .� D W=27.5 / TW=28.0 \ =��� _ _._. TW-28.5 ____... -- � . ; --_--- �\ � � ® TEE 24- - - ,-'26- - \ T�32.0 DMH HP 111 � Fax: 978Tek 9 9192 92755103 -\ 21 68 22x68 21 x� x LL �� --__ _ ------ - =26.0 � n:_ �r. ....: .. .... J'� �.. h...:yi ... .• .:,, ,. -.. , .. "ate._ .:.,.. ... _ / /p� 4y a \ TP 2 TPS \ p MRM PROJECT OP I ��, \ _ =� _ NOTES: -- - _ D MANAGEMENT LLC :-- _ -''--�---fes\ 0 BE CAPABLE OF _3O^ _ _ __-- ___-- , „ � 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS T � _ r � /� -�--��' _�` �'� 2 i __ 1 x T = SUPPORTING MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. M _,�► --- � •�... _. _ _34- � �� '� ,� - � = `-'' k 3� 2 2) DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING SALE MA 2 8 - - = _ - J - �_ CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE PROVIDED FOR PERMITTING ONLY. fi� ` _�'�I -_ � . !\ �_ r see =; - ---- -- --�`•-__-- \_ ,, z 4 3) STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM BUILDING 1, 2 & THE r "• x SHALLOW LIMIT OF WORK 3�- 36__�__ - SOUTHWESTERLY QUARTER OF BUILDING 3 ROOF IS TO BE PIPED -- 8- -38- - �- - 4.� -- - - _ MAI 16 LOT MAP 16 SWALE / o �Oe �-��_ '" �L- �I q _�" THROUGH ROOF LEADERS TO THE INFILTRATION FIELD (DMH3). DISTURBANCE - _ � -11- �'_ �►� 3 224 LOT 225 I `~ '``-- - --- - - _X36" CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING GRADING, DRAINAGE & _ Ns. EROSION CONTROL ' i // ,�„ / , °` DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLA C R MAP 16 �` '�� �"� -C 4) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES LEGEND. N /F #34 N/F LOT 227 #28 APPR0X \ SHED a ,.: ;rh,.;, I-I _ --�_�- - --I.� .►► "� PLA N T C NLEY I TUCKER APPROX. N /F LIMIT OF OF WORK/ TW-32.0 `' ' ? ,, 200' I LIMIT OF I ' EXCAVATION DISTURBANCE ��0{� LAWSON I FISH � . A4�-1_14! GRAPHIC SCALE I I EXCAVATION #32 ,PROP. INFIL, FIELD POND x \ r5f;`s SQa % 1•=20' I I 25 WIDE x 90 LONG BLOCK RETAINING WALT, 20 0 10 20 40 80 BTM FIELD = EL. 12.5 I 4 Job No.: 700 MAP 16 LOT 230 x W/ SWALE ALONG TOP I M E3 111177=73 111177071771= I BTM CHAMBERS „= EL. 13.0 GARDE \I SEE DETAIL, SHEET C-�7 IN FEET ) e e• s h-b C- 4B INV.= 13.0± (12 0 HEADER) N /F ( P�a� � SEE DETAIL, SHEET C-7 DEMEULE inch = 20 ft. ( ) --1 x E f s/2o/�2 r--, P 6 A5 BLSF STORAGE VOLUME COMPARISON \� e (ECB) PRECAST STRUCTURE SCHEDULE � EXIST. .... C B (ECB) o cn �.����.. ELEVATION EXISTING FLOOD PROPOSED FLOOD INCREASE IN CUMULATIVE �j� CLIPS (;UT L -� . �- "- CB8 DMH8 5 P fLH RANGE (FT) STORAGE (CF) STORAGE (CF) STORAGE SCF) INCREASE SCF) \� ,� RIM RIM-8.1 1 0 •� '-' / RIM=11.00 RI 4 to 5 11,691 11,691 0 0 \�O / ~" I(IN)=6.80 I(in)=7.55 (12") �\ / INV.=8.00 \' �-- 10U T =5.85 moi / I(in)=7.55 (12") 5 to 6 12,695 12,695 0 0 ��A, - "'� / R M9 10.80 I(in)=7.55 (15") 6 to 7 13,827 13,827 0 0 ��� ay,,,, �" ' l(out)=7.45 (18") 7 to 8 17,654 17,654 0 0 ,..� `G�� ��. / INV.=7.80 MJH 8 to 9 27,182 27,182 0 0 .>�' � /� � � SEE NOTE 6 CB1O DMH9 5'� '` (DBL GRATE) RIM=10.90 9 to 10 49,836 50,886 1,050 1,050 ` �� �' RIM=10.50 I(in)=7.30 (12") 10 to 11 75,242 77,483 2,241 3,291 ,� �/ INV.=7.50 I(in)=7.30 (18") V� o� .. CB14.11.15&19 I(out)=7.20 (24") NOTES: / / --'` V`�10 >> OMITTED WQS4 1) CALCUALTIONS EXTEND FROM THE APPROXIMATE MHW LINE 50 / � � � � 12 VC OMITTED OF THE RIVER TO ABOVE THE 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMIT OF WOR K/ rJ / / -''® '�--- OUTFALL CB23 RIM-13.25 ELEVATION (10.8 FEET NGVD). DISTURBANCE \NPS � �� '"� � ER •' I � / j I=4.3-±- INV.=9.60 2) CALCS INCLUDE 60 & 64 GROVE STREET, 3 HARMONY �` G�� - , I GN D / BANK#7 / GROVE ROAD AND THE EXISTING RAIROAD CROSSING EASEMENT. t CONTROLS & NO REGRADING WORK IS PROPOSED ON 1 & 5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD. VA \� j / - *CB23 TO HAVE BEEHIVE GRATE (NEENAH MODEL (,IpoV, . ' LrLM�I'T OF WORK - NO. R-4340-C) TOP OF SBA _ ��� ��. DISTURBANCE � �-:5 �o COASTAL �` - ��%' 1.7 NORTH RI VE PIPE SCHEDULE 25 WIDE � II� B AI V C\ / �_ __- / `�' "�' / 2 3 ----'' PIPE LENGTH DIA. SLOPE S. E. S. D . SEWER / - �/ WOOD & METAL , // / � _--- /�. ; 1.9 - CB8 to DMI-18 7.6' 12"0 5.9% J EASEMENT- r �/--BANK4 %/'� 1.�1 BRIDGE W/ u` PIPE CB9 to DMI-18 24' 12"0 1.0% o �_ -�-g� 1.9 DECK- EL. 9.2± - _ j A N K#7 Z.�_ _ C823 to DMI-18 78.2' 15"0 2.6% Q / - -_- DMI-18 to DMH9 8.7 18 1.7% �� ��� - �- j BAN3 '�'� CRUSHED STONE `J ��9 ® ® ® ®® „ s11 U�ivi � .� ® - FILTER STRIP ALONG ISN cB10 to DMH9 11.7 12 1.7% B�ANK2 - EDGE OF PATH. , �� DMH9 to DMH1O 171.5' 24"0 0.6% G� �'`1c' �` B A N K 1 ./j ' NOTE - ALL DRAIN PIPES TO BE CORRUGATED I C® # = I �/ `,J i /j s �- � � PLASTIC PIPE OR RCP. EROSION % U W I W ' • ' REVISE PARKING LOT DRAINAGE CONTROLS �j EXIST. \ W & REMOVE OUTFALL #3 � 6 110/16/14 [-LIMIT OF WORK/ - i�� \ < = Q`_ UPDATE BLSF TABLE. I / / RAILROAD \ REMOVE BLSF COMPENSATORY DISTURBANCE i / /n(j `�L/ / ' 5 12/30/1 FLOOD STORAGE AREAS. REVISE i � __-� p CROSSING � ,s \ \ NOTE 4, GRADING AT RAILROAD --- -B1 K#6 � � CROSSING, & BLSF STORAGE iEASEMENT \ VOLUME COMPARISON TABLE. =t' # MAINTAIN EXIST. A N K 5 _ g_ GRADE ALONG PATH \ 4 7/5/13 FLOOD STORAGE AREAS. ADD BLSF RY s IIIII �� + REVISE STORMWATER TREATMENT DEVICES. __--- BANK#4 -TR ACKS ' - R .R . � .R . i 1�M I �-�- + 3 3/11/13 ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA r\ LINES. REVISE CB10 C611 DMI-18 & DMH9. ADJUST BANK#3 -�-H+�_ - _ _ _ GRADING FOR RELOCATED --- ��� 0 J - - _ MATERIAL CELL. ADD BLSF USETTS - / �� CALCULATION TABLE. BANK-#2 SSACx2 11/6/12 ADD NOTE 6. yuN - BANK#1 1 9/10/12 REVISE CB19 INVERT. ADD LIMIT - -_- h DISTURBANCE B1 O OF WORK LINE. No Date Description _ ,--j� - - - �- -- -- - _ _ _ 11 x -- Revisions I`vf- - - _1 g-- CB9� 11x3 -2 ` BLOCK \ CBS, `� MONITORINGWALLv RET. WELLS --' - / �� I 13x '<<': ROB Z. �� - - � -- - TOW VARIES - ERr s \ - \ 12x0 \ GRIF / (` o � ) � / TW-17.5 \ �`, \ � ••.,. I �4�' ' -� ! MAP 16 LOT 216N /F ! ) - - - -=-- ---_ \ \ �G- /Y RAYMOND BL RETAINING \ � W ARIES TW=23.0 . o \ BLOCK T \ 7x0 �' o i _ ._ 2 - �°`�• WALL ((SEE DETAIL, \ \ 13 _ Grirrin LIMIT OF WORK/ - T-�4� - X26 3% C- 7) En ineenn _ _ _ � - - - -\,\ \ SHEEN g g DISTURBANCE - _-- - - = = --_=2 -- \ TW= 0. TW=22.0 \ \ ' y Group, LLC 6xg �� 14 i. '• I '�' P.o Box 7069 _ ,. ,�' C B 2 3' - R L R 9 Oo Cummings Center, Suite 224 G Z7 +[) i-. 2_ w s � - ` � - MA 01915 � -�- �. � \ � �:� \ ,� • � Ings e LIMIT OF -_ _� '� ` �� �-�- = -� \ �W=15.0 \ 978-927-5111 x Te1: PROPOSED `�� `38 �'`- `3� �- �` 26 \ \ \ '\ \\ NOTES: 03 \�, ,` �- \�� \ _ �� \ - 1) ALL DRAIN PIPES & ROOF LEADERS TO BE CAPABLE OF Fax: 978-927-59 ENGINEERED ST \\�� �-'\ \ :w \ ,� SUPPORTING A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. �� w+ 2) DETAILED RETAINING WALL PLANS REQUIRED DURING BARRIER ��E - I I�/ CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL SECTIONS ON SHEET C-7 ARE PROVIDED MRM PROJECT MAP 16 LOT 217 ALL CB1 FOR PERMITTING ONLY. MANAGEMENT LLC \ 3) DETAILED BRIDGE PLANS MEETING AASHTO STANDARDS N APPROX. ��'� \ \ \ \ �� REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SALEM, MA / LIMIT OF @ �' \ \ \\ �, \ 4) STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM BUILDING 1, 2 & THE SARKES r \ \ � \ 0 SOUTHWESTERLY QUARTER OF BUILDING 3 ROOF IS TO BE PIPED #12 EXCAVATION }+ � \ \ SHALLOW\ \ �` �- 2 - - THROUGH ROOF LEADERS TO THE INFILTRATION FIELD (DMH3). l �SWALE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ROOF LEADERS WITH BUILDING DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS. LIMIT OF WORK/ \ \ �� ` � - TW' 5) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. #6 DISTURBANCE * '� ---- 6) CONTRACTOR TO VIDEO INSPECT HARMONY GROVE ROAD GRADING, DRAINAGE & DRAINAGE OUTFALL PIPE FROM EXISTING CATCH BASIN. BASED ON -- �- \ 21 68 _ INSPECTION RESULTS, ENGINEER TO CONSULT WITH SALEM CITY EROSION CONTROL -BLOCK RETArNtNG WALL , ENGINEER REGARDING NEED TO REPLACE DRAIN LINE. SEE PLAN � MAP 16 LOT 218 \ 2 W - SSWALE ALON-G TOP -' PLANNING BOARD DECISION. S VER SEE -DETAIL -SHEET C � N /FF T C -- -�- -30- - GRAPHIC SCALE 'PUBLIC WAY FLORES /- �_ _ --3 scale: 1'=20' 20 0 10 20 40 80 ( n _ �� 700 g- --38- - - ( IN FEET ) le e• C- 4C #4 Q M A F� 16 L O T I inch = 20 ft. �-• P/P/s/h-b D-Qtt 6/20/12 - _ - - I i m Q \\ F-0wI c) � , 1 00y IWI �v� J pQ = Q NE cf) I \ \ \\ S \ \ \ S i AUTHORITY o � II ► il R . R . TRACKS �— 101 GRA DED HA4C @— D `� G SMH2 D � � RIM=10.3 I D ° O I(IN)=6.85 OUT)=6.80 � EXIS7- EXISTING W WA TER 1 PROP. SERVICEGAS 9. 6STORAGE \\ SIZE BY UTILITY ° PROVIDER '`- AREA �� EXISTING 6' OFFICE ��\`��' SEE NOTE i 9. 6 + I0/yBUILDING - 2 & 5 No T S \ E - Ex�sT6 RC/� .---_ -I-_ S EWER � IDs —e- p A L St� -�3CK R _ \ RIM 10.3 A LL - S70 I(IN)=5.85 _ '! 8"� SDR35 5 P VC E�• S � GR 10_UT =5.80 9. 6 S L p S=0.005 FT/FT �, — ;_ UTILITY' POLE 8 CK � �_- — RF TO BE RELOCATED DING ���R�D tl,r 8 ,� SDR3 S � � Vl•A;LL �. f- �`� . BY CITY VICE. :; �� RLQ 5 '°VC TOVI/ — OPE. :,r RL SEL — S _� = '10/16/14REVISE DRAINAGE ON 60 4 6GROVE STREET & ,r _� R�= FT/F S __ � (�' � 4 OUTFALLS. ADJUST SEWER ATER /� RL �j D \ � INVERTS. R� S D 3 3/10/14 REMOVE PARKING FROM REAR I'd _� D OF 60 GROVE ST. S � 2 2/30/13 ADD NOTE 5 & 6 ° H 4 , ADD FORAD RIVERFRONT AREA >_ ABANDON EXIST. 1 3/11/13 I +•`,,;' rho PROPOSED R pP � RIM=���� s �� WATER SERVICES uNEs. REMOVE ALL oSE� PROP. 8 0 I(IN)=5.65 I No Date Description EXISTING ON—STIE W BU�LDIN PVC BUILDING S WAR f z ��-�' & VALVE PIT PER UTILITIES UNLESS CA G #3 �� I(OUT)=5.60 E)IST• Q CITY STANDARDS Revisions ;,•�..' NOTED OTHERWISE. E UNDE SEWER SERVICE. 8 0 X4-3, U R MIN. 2% SLOPE. SID L� �, N� TS� EXIS P EXIST. r. • ..�. 7 a0 MIN. 18 M W�TER VC VALVE \ wv ' G� ,`:u.• .`� •. � MDC TRAP # �� SEPARATION ,. 2 ��D PIT �z 4 � ESMH1 p ES H1 . :i .< R-� NEAT CROSSING `� RIM=11 .25 s�0� —_` I(out)=7.0 EXIST. 8" T H I•. G n --� wAT�IS S \ _ OO'RT l� 'Ky 'f e PFIN ' , • .��— " W `�' ® ''-_ W N, w EXIST. 10 S WEIR s S P OPOSED656 :y C L� R S ESM - E S S G 'mss TfR PLE GAT + W G 01 R� ° �— G nM9 131 VE �L MERS f • rrin -k: Gri CONNECT TO p • ngineenng Yo PROP. GAS SERVICE EXISTING SMH \ Group, LLC REMOVE & RESET \ PROP. SEPARATE 4 � T SIZE BY UTILITY RIM=11 .30 \ \ � UTILITY POLE. � _ P.0 Box 7061 POTABLE WATER SERVICE & PROVIDER PROP. 8 0 CLDI I(IN)=5.20 .>- � 200� S RISER D 0 WIN TO FIRE P R 0 T. SERVICES. , SEE l(OUT)=5.15 s \ \ \ ��� 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G �� FRp� I ETCH XFORMER PADS. NOTE PIPE. MIN. 5 \� Beverly, MA 01915 w ETCH 1 &3. (TYP EACH BUILDING) COVER (SEE NOTE 2) �, s \\ � Tel: 978-927-5111 WALL \ Fax: 978-927-5103 Z \ \ NOTES: /A 1) FIRE PROTECTION BUILDING SERVICES TO BE SIZED BY MECHANICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. I `— ALL � MRM PROJECT C? \ \ 2) EXISTING SEWER SERVICE IS CURRENTLY BRICKED—UP. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE BRICK AND VIDEO INSPECT EXISTING SERVICE CONNECTION TO THE MANAGEMENT, LLC 16 LOT 232MAIN. CITY TO DETERMINE IF SERVICE IS ACCEPTABLE FOR REUSE OR #2 II NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. REPLACE SERVICE WITH 10" SDR35 PVC IF SALEM, MA Y N F BIT. CONIC. PARKING REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR TO REBUILD INVERT AND REPAIR DAMAGE FROM I �� i BRICK REMOVAL. MYERS I MAP 16 X10 / 3) COORDINATE BUILDING SERVICE LOCATIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINE LOT 235 EXIST. SEWER � � � DRAWINGS. MAP .16 SCHEDULE EDU LE �/ 4) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND. —"\ MAP 16 N F / / / 5) CONTRACTOR TO VIDEO INSPECT EXISTING BUILDING SEWER SERVICE FOR MAP 16 LOT 234 LOT 380 ESMH1 / Q2 60 GROVE STREET AND REPAIR OR REPLACE IF NECESSARY. / LOT / P A TTI S 0 N RIM—'1 O.26 , / 6) CONTRACTOR TO PRESSURE TEST NEW SEWER MAINS TO VERIFY WATER UTILITIES PLAN 233 N /(= N/ TIGHT CONDITION. INV-- 3-08 i 7 CONTRACTOR TO VERFIY EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE (ESMH2) INVERT C S WI G G I N P A TTI S O N = i PRIOR TO SETTING ANY STRUCTURES OR SEWER LINES. SPERIDAKOS I01H 2 I — - RIM=11 .28 iGRAPHIC SCALE sc • 1•_ zo INV=5.1 3 // 40 0 20 40 80 180 BEA VER STREET �i/� / � _ Job No, goo i � e _ C- 5A (PUBLIC WA I N 30 ' WIDE) i i i \/ / ( IN FEET ) Name P/P/s/h b n i 1 inch = 40 ft. Dgk- 6/20/12 r - i , I Q 12„ VC \ 12" VC OUTFALL \ \ �r. Imo--- OUTFALL 1-5.3± \N K 1=4.3± \ � I I \ T. ONI � \ NORTH RIVER CANAL TIDA WOOD & METAL \ BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE REMEDIATION AREA 1 / DECK= EL. 9.2± (SEE SHEET C-10) \ BANK#91 � --AN 10 BANK 11 �o B # # BANK#14 I BAND#12 BANK#13 BANK#1 5 EXISTING 1 , U W 1 0 W REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE U W I U (.� ~ W I � WMH PUMP STATION � ABUTMENTS SWWQ = Q Q = Q = FM FM M ❑ FORCE MAIN. CUT & cn l => cn 1 .5" FORCE MAINCAP EXIST. 4" SERVICE w I iLuNSP OR TA Tl ONBAY Luc/-) TRA _ I - I U Li T I — 1 — TOP OF 1Lr_ --I— SMH1 GR COASTAL SMH2 ,�� �_---- __. RIM=10.3 RIM 11 .0 0 V ---.._"LOC ' _______ BANK I(IN)=6.85 - -- \ ( ) PLUG' ALL EXIST. E� • Wq - I(OUT)=6.80 I(OUT)=7.65 OUTFALLS ALONG �'�- TQ w — -- D D D O D D D D ° ,, �_ ---__ CANAL WALL. EL. 9 D D -r-- D DLE -__ • t3 FENCE R ENCLOSED ETQ TALL}L L 4 / / 101614 REVISE STORMWATER OUTFALLS TRASH & RECYCLING p o -- T W � L Q 1 ADJUST SEWER INVERTS. REMOVE PARKING FROM REAR BIN STORAGE AREAyYo s -- EL 3 3/10/14 OF 60 GROVE ST. ® (TYP EACH BUILDING) , S ® � 2 30 13 ADD NOTE 4 PROPOSED �� S ��_ _ 11 3/11/13 �INDSFORAD RIVERFRONT AREA 1 8"0 D.I. BUILDING � �005CS � D_ �� No. Date 'p PROPO.�ED BUILD a #1 SEER SERVICE. " 0R35 Description �® P vc S — Revisions W GARAGE NDER MIN. 2� SLOPE. S_o. 004 F..................... S (43— NITS of �lI TIFT s W W Y. PROPOSED RQPQS Q s � CONNECT FLOOR I �-. � ��� PROPOSED 8 � DRAINS TO MDC TRAP. QtiRgQE #2 p UNDE BUILDING ROBE T (TYP EACH BUILDING) —______ 4 D E '/ GRIFFINrn ' C R y G a MDC TRAP #1 D (� , H. R SEWER SERVICE. DI CIVIL = o s) RIM 11 .80 MIN. 2% SLOPE. „ �I� " #36686 <� , R L I(out)=8..0 , RL RL R RL RL R L RL D G� DAQ ,.. , , t ,,, •,. L�_R REMOVE EXIST. LLII J!!! y 1 1 ��R DRAINAGE SYSTEM w`4 • W G ® ® • , W W W G ' G Gfirrin D D w G Engineering D Group, LLC 63 PROP. 8"0 CLDI 111 PROP. SEPARATE 4"0 D ------- D -----_ G 4 P.0 Box 7061 PIPE. 5 COVER POTABLE WATER SERVICE & D p D < W G _ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 2246 RE PROT. SERVICES. SEE > — D , Beverly, MA 01915 D ® G _ NOS; 1 &2. (TYP EACH . d o 1 �� THR � W G Tel: 978-927-5111 NG 1 yry,,,, BUILDI ,; ) Y OCKS --__ D �/r G ��o Fax: 978-927-5103 ... D MRM PROJECT D PROP. HYDRANT k . , -- —_ \� L 1—D _� MANAGEMENT, LLC J —_ SALEM, M �� _ PROP. CO AD h,r NCEPT P ' INFILTRATION _----_ . MOUNT TRANSFORMERS IELD (TYP OF 3) MAI 16 LOT MAP 16 _ u .: _, I 1) FIE E PROTECTION BUILDING SERVICES TO BE SIZED BY MECHANICAL ' ENGINEER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. 1224 LOT 225 MAP 16 . / 2) COORDINATE BUILDING SERVICE LOCATIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINE UTILITIES PLAN N �F #34 N�F ,LOT 227 #28 ,SHED ,, ,.. I a DRAWINGS. r, if 3) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES & LEGEND. T I C N LEY I TUC ER N FQ S 4) CONTRACTOR TO PRESSURE TEST NEW SEWER MAINS TO VERIFY WATER / ' ® � ? I ETC TIGHT CONDITION. #32 LAWSON —. Q A4GRAPHIC SCALE Sc =20' i c I 1 40 0 20 40 80 160 MAP 16 L 0 T 230 yob No, goo I 5B — N F I ( IN FEET ) P�P�s/h—b 1 inch = 40 ft. DEMEULE 1 MAP 16 LOT 232 � s/2o/�2 EXIST. �, EXIST. v \ ; �`Y ' .� CB (ECB) � CLIMB CUT, ,.. RIM-8.10 :� I(IN)-6.80 K..� . I(OUT –5.85 12 VIC 00 \� 50 OUTFALL P �' BANK#7 i=4.3± VA s TOP 0E LUG EXIST. COASTAL . CONNECTION IV OR TH RI V 25' WIDE BANK -5 (SEE N OTE 2) -- -.-- / S. E. S. D . SEWER WOOD & METAL.. _•--� EASEMENT BANKff4 BRIDGE W/ 8 PIPE - / DECK– EL. 9.2± BANK#7 BANK#3 N BANK#8 BANK#9 BANK#2 ' c� B A N K 1 / r Uwic-) w _.. .. �" EXIST. F— W i-- w BANK#6 CROSSING EASEMENT BANK#5 _ - d BANK#4 K S � '�-+ TR /�C _ R . H-f--}-}-}- -{-{- I-H-I-I- -I-I-}�-�- BANK#3 REVISE STORMWATER OUTFALL SETTS 3 0/16/14& HYDRANT NEAR BUILDING 1 BA,NK 2 ACH 2 3/11/13 ADD REMEDITATION AREA AND M RELOCATED MATERIAL CELL BANK#1 I s,3 1 11/6/12 ADD NOTE 2 PER S.E.S.D. s No. Date Description TR �CKS M -I - Revisions FSR . M_ - - � D M – – D D D p 1� – � -04 . " "�11 - - I BULK TRASH – MONITORING STORAGE AREA I ® D 1 WELLS WITHIN FENCEDI f r-r , TYP OF 4) ENCLOSURE I ,a RCBERT '. *�Iv GRIFFIN 1 I �, � WV � cIlIc a 1 I 0 ' » PROP. 8 0 CLDI R 1 - 1 I PIPE. 5' COVER MAP 16 LOT 216 1 RELOCATED I ' I NSF 1 MATERIAL CELL ABANDON EXIST. a RAYMOND 1 (GRASS) I 60 WATER MAIN - BEYOND ' CONNECTION o 4. Gntrin Engineering Group, LLC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IE ' �. P.O Box 7061 rCenter, Suite 224G w wN, . r .,, ., _ .,. . .... Beverly, MA 01915 � > �• , ;�_• 100 Cummings Tel: 978-927-5111 5 ; Fax: 978-927-5103 NE RETPoA ' MRM PROJECT MAP 16 LOT 217 MANAGEMENT, LLC N /F ��� ,��.� SALEM, MA �� ��� 8x6x8 PROP. t SARKES TEE #12 PIPE. #6 �-� � MAINTAIN EXISTING , 1 NOTES: REFER TO SHEET N- UTILITIES 6"0 WATER MAIN 2) CONTRACTOR TO PLUG EXISTING TSOE S.E.S.D. CONNECTION IN IES PLAN .;a MANHOLE ON NORTHERLY END OF EXISTING WOOD & METAL BRIDGE. C 0 N N E C TI O N TO '-��-� -�-=� MAP 16 LOT 21 8 ' REMOVE FRAME & COVER AND HAND OVER TO S.E.S.D. PERSONNEL. SIL VER BEAVER STREET FILL MANHOLE WITH COMPACTED GRAVEL AND ABANDON. N /F ' GRAPHIC SCALE (PUBLIC WA Y FLORES I 40 s� 1"=20' 0 20 40 80 180 7777i7�7T1Ti �� 69 In 11I fob No.: 700 u J File Nam C- 5C ( IN FEET ) e• p/p/s/h-b MAI 16 LOT ; 1 inch = 40 ft. DS-tC 6/20/12 J ; i 1 2 3 q SMaxiForce m Collapsible Bollard EE TABLE OF 3000 PSI CONCRETE FINISH THRUST BLOCK AGAINST 1 TTTT Standard Body, Padlock Operated, Standard Style 1 Head, Universal Base GRADE BEARING AREAS UNDISTURBED I FOR THE AREA \ �� MATERIAL A AN7 approved in many cities(counties/campuses for \ / ��\\ / OF CONCRETE 45°•'' , use in fire lanes per International Fire Code(IFC)50 I REQUIRED MAX. O ° ° 0 1 o O 0 °o° o ° 000O 000008°0 WATER MAIN 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 1�6•� ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX ° 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 ssi Bead AND COVER 0 0 0 0° :° 0 0 0 000 000 0 000 w , J O , ,s,;••,,,' , •;t, :i Two sided locking pin available U 0 ::..':.y? :•" , , : upon request(allows two '.{ : •�..; separate parties entrance). TAPPING TEE. \ \ •\ ,, \/\/�. CONFIRM SIZES FLANGED / PLAN OF THRUST B g J PRIOR To CONST. BOLTED GATE BLOCK AT BEND KEY: 32- 40 1,4" „ Above Grade Orerail Height Patented breakaway VALVE 1. 1.5 CLASS 1 BIT. CONCRETE TOP COURSE TYPE 1-1 (M3.11.0 -TABLE A). deemergency� aece s CL 52 CLDI WATER 2. 2" CLASS 1 BIT. CONCRETE BINDER COURSEcan be without a key.This unit j MAIN (M3.11.0 - TABLE A). the bumpelr of a veh cleed over h 3. 12" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE 35/6• 3• SUB-BASE (M2.01.7) eieat�n� '` Padlock by others. 4. COMPACTED SUBGRADE o iE ! TEE : . e 10"x iD" • ° a r. a< Top Plate WATER MAIN FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT ". 2 d � `" GATE VALVE � � N� �g • t C Below Urade:.�. 7 �, •e r t a� a e i C .. x '4 Flush surface when bollard is removed. f. . N.T.S. � -At'. s� �� , '•..o- :�•�� �.� .. N '. ; t�*.��`"� •-a Leaves no tripping hazarc)and r•"._• ���x. N.T.S. • '.c ,' ;. won't catch snow plows or other maintenance equipment. ' •, •, r r G'x6"Tube NOTE: 3000 PSI CONCRETE GRAVEL BORROW FILL AND DENSE GRADED CRUSHED AGAINST STONE SHOULD MEET THE GRADATION SPECIFICATIONS Low Maintenance/Durable sheet construction Universal Base BACKFILL TO SUBGRADE W/ UNDISTURBED 450 MAX. ESTABLISHED IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE One yearwarrantyI Protected)by$1,000,000In iiabiuty insurance CLEAN GRANULAR BACKFILL MATERIAL \ -No complex assembly required)is the field COMPACT TO 95% MOD. PROCTOR ••.�• SEE TABLE OF MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT No -Custom sizes,options,colors aind finishes available upon request CLEAN GRANULAR BACKFILL THRUST BLOCK SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES". THESE -Finish options available(add erode to the end of the model number) NO STONES LARGER THAN 3" LAYERS SHOULD BE PLACED IN LOOSE LIFTS NOT TO Powder coated(PC) COMPACT TO 95% MOD. PROCTOR BEARING AREAS Powder coated with DRI2IINC primer(PCZ) EXCEED 12-INCHES AND BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST - Hot di galvanized(G) ,•ani ,M FOR THE AREA P 9 45 In 35 lbs MaxiFarce Traffic Control Bollards 95 PERCENT OF THE MATERIALS MAXIMUM DRY - Hot dip galvanized&powder coated(GPC) PLAN OF THRUST OF CONCRETE " D « .. , 7560 Man Street 0 AS REQ'D DENSITY AS DERTERMINED BY ASTM DESIGNATION -Reflective tape available upon request 1 sllz2oo9 BLOCK AT TEE REQUIRED 410-5n7lc,Mo217s,4 D-1557. M;PROPRIETARY �tra:osor�+NFIDennn� �` � % ma),if98(pimne) corn -552-9^39(fat) M, r•na„axwernnM-1r,0w•oc�s,rule: ,wh�'mA�rifarcebollards:com - sales�rnaxlforteboltards.rnm Q ,:c k-UL-T OF tri M u IG11�RF MCSP-SS1-U 2 rF w arcnrt r str,Fr orgu aze rktiame IICSP-SSl-V I 12" WATER, SEWER, OR DRAIN. n'm�.rosct`'rrne'rr['' C iczfe NA OO N075CALE DRAWlPlG Sheet 1 Of 1 SETT AT MINIMUM DEPTH OR t z s 9 INWERTS AS INDICATED. 2" MIN.* °o°aoo 0 0°°oo GROUND SURFACE 24" ROUND FRAME AND 0 0 COVER SET AT FINISHED \ 3000 PSI CONCRETE /'�� APPROXIMATE LOCATION FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. ° 0RADE 0 BACKING AGAINST - SEE TABLE OF SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 0;00 000 6" MIN - BOTTOM UNDISTURBED MATERIAL THRUST BLOCK EXACT LOCATION TO BE - 0° 0 0 00 AND SIDES o DETERMINED IN ADVANCE 45 BEARING AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION _ CONC. COLLAR 3/8" CRUSHED STONE MAX. FOR THE AREA 12" MIN. I OR SCREENED GRAVEL NOTES: •'. OF CONCRETE 3 10/16/14 REMOVE NON APPLICABLE BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION PROVIDE JOINT RESTRAINTS = REQUIRED PRECAST BUILDING SEWER DETAIL. ADD (TIE RODS OR MEGALUG) FOR / X ADJUST TO GRADE ALL JOINTS WITHIN 15' OF 45' Q ECCENTRIC CONC. REMOVABLE BOLLARD DETAIL HYDRANT TO BE WITH COURSES CONE OR COLLAR * FOR DUCTILE IRON OR RCP PIPE: TOP OF STONE IS MID-DEPTH (SPRING LINE) OF CONDUIT. BEND, WITHIN 20' OF DEAD .'•:', : \ � AMERICAN DARLING OF BRICK FLAT TOP 2 2/30/1 SPECIFY WATERTIGHT BOLTED •- � '• N 8628 OPEN RIGHT. SEWER MANHOLE COVER END HYDRANT, AND WITHIN 15REVISE CURBING AND OF MAIN LINE TAPS. _ tLMAIN CONElz� / DETAIL TO CONCRETE. SIDEWALK •'•,•. _ STEPS 1 6/20 12 TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING SECTION ADJUSTABLE `✓ACNE FINISH PRECAST RISER No Date Description BOX COVER GRADE PIPE 0!/%\ % %//�\\% PER PLAN ReVISIOnS N .T.S. THRUST BLOCK SECTION RISER 6" FLANGED & BACK UP HYDRANT WITH NON-SHRINK BROOM BOLTED GATE 6 SQ. FT. 3000 PSI GROUT 4' FINISH VALVE �`' AGAINST UNDISTURBED PRECAST 1M,�,, 4 WIDTH U.N.O. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK �y � i� FINISH MATERIAL. BASE MANHOLE * GRADE ° o i ETE Min. '_' r N• T. S• 30BACKI00 SNG AGAINST o o BASE � ROBERT SLOPE TO DRAIN ° 1-.-6 Min - UNDISTURBED MATERIAL. °A'O° ala` GRIFFIN W. •a o SEE TABLE ON THRUST °0p• 6 CRUSHED c �" " �• o BLOCK BEARING AREA °°•e0• a CIVIL 4 • PROVIDE 10 CU. FT. � r , • e 3/8" CRUSHED STONE TO STONE BASE356g6 TABLE OF MINIMUM BEARING AREAS IN SQ. FT. FOR THE AREA OF J . o" " ,<� { • pO' ; 0 12 ABOVE DRAIN HOLE. BRICK MASONRY OR 8 0 • . CONCRETE REQUIRED. 3000 PSI CONCRETE • • • • • ' AGAINST UNDISTURBED MATERIAL NOTES: "'�`Y�`�a F D x 6" HYDRANT " 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. \--6x6 W1.4xW1.4 WWF TEE OUTLET WITH 6 FLANGED PREPARED SPOOL PIECES) FLAT STONE OR 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. WIRE MESH VALVE RESTRAINING SUBGRADE PRESSURE 150 PSI JOINT CONCRETE BLOCK IN./LINEAL FT. AND 0.12 SQ. IN. (BOTH WAYS) BASE BOTTOM. 7 GRAVEL 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. BASE 3,000 PSI GRAVEL BEDDING 4. LEBARON TYPE LBB 268-3 BOLTED W/ GASKETED WATERTIGHT COVER COURSE CONCRETE TYPE OF SOIL CONDITION PIPE (OR APPROVED EQUAL). 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. SIZE BEND 6. TONGUE & GROOVE JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIN. * WALK TO BE ADA COMPLIANT UNLESS NOTED A B C D E F (G 7. SEE FORCE MAIN CONNECTION DETAIL SHEET C-9. OTHERWISE. MAX SLOPE = 1/4 PER FOOT TYPICAL HYDRANT ASSEMBLY WITH DRAIN 8. FOUNDATION SUPPORT FOR STRUCTURE PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. �trTin TEES & PLUGS 8.5 4.5 3 2.5 1 .5 1.5 1 4'0 PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE En ineenn9' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6„ N.T.S. N.T.S. and 90 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 .5 Group, LLC smaller 45 6.5 3.5 2.5 2 1.5 1 1 N N .T.S. P.0 Box 7069 22 1 /2 3.5 2 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 900 Cummings Center, Suite 224G TEES & 15.5 8 5.5 4 3 2 1 .5 Beverly, MA 01995 8„ PLUGS TRENCH WIDTH Tel: 978-927-5111 90 21 .5 11 7.5 5.5 4 3 2.5 FINISHED GRADE 45 12 6 4 3 - 2 1.5 1 .5 SEE TABLE OF GROUND SURFACE Fax: 978-927-5103 THRUST BLOCK 22 1 / 6 3 2 1.5 1 1 1 BEARING AREAS 6" WADE YELLOW FOR THE AREA • MRM PROJECT CONCRETE CURB TYPE OF SOIL CONDITION OF ROEQUIRED ///\\\ BITUMINOUS �� 12 MARKER TAPES- - - - CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, LLC TOP COURSE FINISH GRADE A - SOFT CLAY; FINE LOOSE SAND 2_0 MIN. WELL COMPACTED �- 2 6 MAX. CONDUITS (TYP.) FILL FREE OF SALEM, MA B - SAND & CLAY; MIXED OR IN LAYERS; FINE CONFINED SAND450 / LARGE STONES " j\��\/�\��� C - HARD DRY CLAY H \ BITUMINOUS 6 //\ MAX. D - COARSE SAND , y CONCRETE BINDER ,; E - GRAVEL \ COURSE a , . 12 F - SOFT ROCK // H/2 MAX. 00. : 00 ,:a I CEMENT CONCRETE G - HARD PAN 'i.'Y °o , 6" NOTES: / \ �i>\\\ DETAILS _ -,I 1. FOR FITTINGS WITH LESS THAN 22 •DEFLECTION USE BEARING AREAS FOR 22 BEND. .•_ '. SPACE APPROX. COMPACTED r COMPACTED 3" APART (TYP.) GRAVEL BASE SUBGRADE 2. JOINTS SHALL NOT BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE. BEARING AREAS MAY BE DISREGARDED FOR TRENCHES IN ROCK WHERE THE.TOP OF THE ROCK FACE IS AT OR ABOVE THE CROWN OF r \ / /�\\�� 2" MIN. TAMPED SAND THE PIPE. HOWEVER, CONCRETE BACKING SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE PIPE AND ROCK FACE. 3000 PSI CONCRETE ABOVE AND BELOW CONDUITS CONCRETE CURB BACKING AGAINST N.T.S. UNDISTURBED MATERIAL SCale: 1"=40� CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREA CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK AT PLUG UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TRENCH FOR MULTIPLE CONDUITS ,lob No. 700 N • T. `�• N .T.S. NOT TO SCALE File Name: P/p/s/h-b C- 6 Dd% 12/20/11 77 12" 8„ FINISH GRADE. PROPOSED 15" CHDPE PIPE PAVED PARKING LOT NATIVE FILL 18"0 CHDPE OVERFLOW FROM WQS#1 t INV.=14.75' ••.' ' INV.=15.10 I 48„ OPTIONAL TOP SLAB 3/4" - 1.5 INCH WASHED, STORMTECH SC-740 DMH3 CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE SOLID END CAPS STORMTECH SC-740 GRANULAR WELL-GRADED PT SC740E CHAMBERS. (TYP OF 60) INSPECTION PORT BTM OF BED FRAME AND COVER SOIL. 95% COMPACTION # FRAME & COVER ELEV. 12.5 SET AT FINISHED FILTER FABRIC 7 OZ/SY (TYP OF 5) SPACE 56"f O.C. ' FINISHED NON-WOVEN, WRAP BTM ELEV. 13.0' TO GRADE. 12"0 CHDPE GRADE GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. INFIL. FIELD COMPLETELY SC-740 CHAMBER 96 ( ) 60 CHAMBERS PROPOSED MAX. LTYP OF 3 INV.=13.10' T(5 UNITS WIDE, 12 LONG) CONC. COLLAR ;.:. . : 1 .: 8„ - 12" MIN. ' MIN. 809 =1 I=) o 0 12" Min. 0 0 � „ CONE !. 24 ~ ADJUST TO GRADE ! 12 0 STORMTECH _) I I= 'r P P � DOUBLE MANIFOLD WITH COURSES = Q��U I b a 30 25 0 III OF BRICK �-� � �; �1� " , 1- PT# 1252AN7412 I \� \ / \ / (TYP OF 2) ••'' -III-=I P 6" Min. -11 I-=1 1 _ _ _ _ •. I I - - _� I I=1 T I_I i I-III 11 i I 1-11 -.I 11=1 11=1 I I-III- STORMTECH RISER �''IIII IIII=IIII II I„I I- CHAMBER END CAPS -III, BTM OF SC-740 5" o PT# SC740EPE12B 48" (TYP U.N.O.) BTM OF FIELD 49„t y 12 MIN. TYP. (TYP OF 5) (SEE NOTE 8) � ELEV. 13.0' 51"� " ELEV. 12.5' (SEE NOTE 3) ESHWT ELEV. 8.4' 5" INFILTRATION FIELD 90' 12"0 STORMTECH' STONE - !.; PIPE SIZES PER PLAN TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 1INFILTRATION FIELD DETAIL t• PERIMETERJ 90 MANIFOLD BEND BASE STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBER SYSTEM ON SIDES PT# 1298AN74 N.T.S. & END N.T.S. NOTES: 1) PROPOSED FIELD DIMENSIONS 25'X90'. 2) MANUFACTURED BY STORMTECH OF 20 BEAVER ROAD, SUITE 104, WETHERSFIELD, CT 06109 USA ,.;.. .:.M• , 888-892-2694 6'° CRUSHED 3) CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, SUBSOIL & URBAN FILL FROM BELOW THE INFILTRATION FIELD AND ESTABLISH BOTTOM OF FIELD GRADE WITH CLEAN SAND MEETING THE SPECIFICATIONS OF "TITLE 5" SAND. REVISE WEIR MANHOLE & I BRICK MASONRY OR 6" STONE BASE Notes 5 10/16/14DMH7B DETAIL 3000 PSI CONCRET NOT FOR CDNSTRUCTION- CONTACT HYDRO 7 6 1.MANHOLE WALL AND SLABREVISE DROP MANHOLED, INTERNATIONAL FOR SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS 4 THICKNESSES ARE NOT TO 4 12/30/1 BYPASS WEIR MANHOLE DETAIL NOTES: SECTION VIEW 2.CONTACT HYDRO & DOWNSTREAM DEFENDER INTERNATIONAL FORA DETAIL. 1. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. 12ain[,o,00lt) BOTTOM OF STRUCTURE CLARIFY ELEVATIONS ON 2. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO LATEST ASTM A185 SPEC. 0.12 SQ. 115 In 19.57fq / ELEVATION PRIOR TO 3 7/5/13 INFILTRATION FIELD. REVISE 8 SETTING FIRST DEFENSE STORMWATER TREATMENT IN./LINEAL FT. AND 0.12 SQ. IN. (BOTH WAYS) BASE BOTTOM. MANHOLE. 3. H-20 DESIGN LOADING. 102 in DEVICES. ADD DROP AND CONC. COLLAR SMALL CAST IRON FRAME & COVER (H2O). [B.6ofl) 3.CDNTRACTORTocoNFlRR1 ' RIM,PIPE INVERTS,PIPE DIA. BYPASS WEIR MANHOLE DETAIL. 4. LEBARON LA-246 FRAME & SOLID COVER (MARKED DRAIN) OR APPROVED 12 MIN. SET ON 2 GRADING RINGS & MORTAR BED AND PIPE ORIENTATION REVISE LAYOUT 3/8 CRUSHED STONE 'r >, PRIOR TO RELEASING UNIT REVISE STONE DEPTH ON TOP EQUIVALENT. OR 2 COURSES BRICK AND MORTAR. OR SCREENED GRAVEL � `,�. TOFABRICATiON. 5. SHEA PRECAST OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 12" PLACE CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND �' "��, 7B in[6.50 fl) 2 4/25/13 OF INFIL. CHAMBERS. ADD 6. TONGUE & GROOVE JOINTS SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. BUTYL RESIN. " 6 THICKNESS MIN. STRUCTURE. --- -'� (INLET ROUTLET) L 1_ . ADD NOTE FOR TITLE 5 SAND 7. FOUNDATION SUPPORT PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 48" BELOW GRADING RINGS i FIRST ISSUE BELOW INFIL. FIELD. 8. DMH 5, 8, 9 & 10 TO BE 5'D PRECAST MANHOLES. 8„ 12"� PIPE INSPECTION PORT WITH SCREW-IN CAP ----- -- ----- 2 EVBY DATE DESCRIPTION REVISE INFILTRATION FIELD TO . `'"`^- REVISION HISTORY 1 6/20/12 A ---- ---- �i, 3 SC-740 CHAMBERS. ADD FROM WQS2 LOAM & SEED 3,000 PSI CONCRETE - Date Scale TYPICAL MULTIPLE INLET PLAN PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE 18"0 PIPE INV.=6.50 45tI41n(3.77fl) r FROM DMH7A :. 17/1/2011 511s"=1'0" VIEW TO STORMCEPTOR DETAIL. I INV.=6.00 " 12"� PIPE ` t EMH MRJk� MRS REVISE PRECAST DRAIN FROM CB21 MANHOLE AND YARD DRAIN N . T. S. INV.=5.500. 2 t Title DETAIL. 48 4" PVC RISER t :," 7 4-FT DIAMETER ,.. ' . 18 96'� FIRST DEFENSE NO Date Description 8"0 ROOF LEADER MIN ` MAX. 0 in(0.00 ft) ' •,'.., N. .., p FROM BUILDING #3 ;+ ' ' r( Revisions INV.=6.50 12" 8" , • y' SECTION A-A '`" 'r• - -ti TJ GENERALARRANGEMENT 1 i am 24" 18"0 PIPE TO o e o a o 0 0 0 o INSPECTION PORT TO BE U-ttZ 8" SECTION VIEW OUTFALL #1 °NOTES: INV.=4.20 ATTACHED THROUGH CAPACITIES: aat[ a i 1. SEE PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE DETAIL FOR SC-310 CHAMBER KNOCK-OUT LOCATED storrnvuater " . - 1.PEAK HYDRAULIC FLOW:6.0 cfs(170 Vs) Parts List AT CENTER OF CHAMBER I / , 48" MATERIAL SPECS AND ADDITIONAL NOTES. 2.TR5ATMENT FLOW:0.7ds(20[Is) v w ,ti FILTER FABRIC 7 OZ/SY ITEM SIZE(In) DESCRIPTION 3.SEDIMENT STORAGE CAPACITY:1 cu.yd.(0.76 cu.m.) WRAP INFIL. 2 INLET CHUTE(WI FLOATABLES TRAP) o ROH. G 1 48 I.D.CONCRETE MANHOLE 4.OIL STORAGE CAPACITY:180 gal.(681 liters) 94 Hutchins Drive OPTIONAL TOP SLAB NON-WOVEN, MaineH. U, DRAIN MANHOLE DMH7B DETAIL FIELD COMPLETELY - -- --- -, ADDITIONAL DESIGN INFORMATION: Portland,0 6 00 �i GrZIFFIN I 3 OUTLET CHUTE --' '�-- --" Fax:(207)756-6212 ClV4L SQUARE FRAME AND 1.MAXIMUMINLE7f0UTLETPIPEDIAMETERS:18tH. stormwaterinquiry@hl-tech.com r �58r GRATE SET AT FINISHED N.T.S. 4 18 INLET PIPE(BY OTHERS) PORT $ 18 OUTLET PIPE Y OTHERS 2.MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INLET PIPES:2 ;: 1<. FINISHED GRADE. SEE NOTE 4. INSPECTION POI 1 DETAIL ) 3,MINiMUMANGLEBETWEENPiPES:90DEC-REES ,r_t F�� GRADE 6 HIGH FLOW BYPASS € ° CON C. COLLAR N.T.S. 7 30 FRAME AND COVER(OR GRATE) Ary,.s•nrsyrwds ty l+,dra bde.nsUwat a'N sppsw lotAs7w M1^w suppnsd by lL Hydro Frte•rrWtanal Mow rolKwpl erd a.?rnsy'a,c'rlms nyrwpwnBlAt,or Aabl'!h Por.ry.LuS�.p Sv.quh....d(orlo Pw.1M1 CAD Ref. F40A 16 . 16 . � r @2011 �dwig ed•bat b-f" 1pe y.Hydd Yis Wonelhw spAfficy etmtiFinanpMeedwnYgmonl snd ntarrw leApKfe smr dCsaprJ7w9en,et�yn'R,poAc�amupmsrtlatry tlnn.Flydminbswgorw!s,prssslyCsrJsbnesryll,blNyter+tlapartwmsn dhequrpnwrt(amrypargrrswQwed wNods rbledtoWndNk,rsmts'd.Ntit*wdhonaWWit lnHy,bobderrowwsd.*nANeeM1me-m project No. Hydro International F,ydn MlonwAarWawne llw,{yh°'Y In rmdbets a+n..mo srNdrbs,rpprre in oo,Wsnos,sM ssl lntsrrded mcgen„Mgr.aYs.:ng,gmaruwlnaoer,.goeso:nld m.drw;-y r,aweorm.ie nam:nn e+u•.ry puposn othuffm for which hwsseLppnmend rel reprodup,br,Wow hperLrwdsftw erryat the ePu!pn MI,r2Rjue wdedcmdthsrain.wtlraul prbrweftipwm!wand Hyd,,,i,,t w,,w. Drawing No.F4GA Rev. 12" MIN. POE :. 12„ ADJUST TO GRADE WITH COURSES OF BRICK t CONC. COLLAR ■ ■ CONE 24 12" MIN. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - CONTACT HYDRO Notes 1.MANHOLEWALL AND SLAB �I I DRAINTECH POLYOLEFIN INTERNATIONAL FOR SiTE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS THiCKNESSESARENOTTO ' 10" SCALE. 12"� ATRIUM GRATE 7� MRO Engineenng 48". •... 4" PLACE 3" THICK LAYER NOTE: s 0 DOWNSTREAM ® ' 2 L J INTERNATIONAL FORA GLOUn LLC 2 PIPE " DEFENDER IS SIMILAR 1 ELEVATIONBOTTOM FPRORTO STRUCTURE ~� 48 .; 6 8 TO DMH128 OF 1 STONE © GRATE.• f INV.=6.00 MIN. 18" ALL AROUND. SLOPE TO DRAIN s SETTING DOWNSTREAM „ .,, RIM:62 5!8 In DEFENDER MANHOLE. 24"0 PIPE , 4 P.O Box 7061 RISER FROM DMH10S O T. . .78"in COMPACTED r i I 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G INV.=6.10 EARTH 1 { Beverly, MA 01915 i ' LEDGER.61 114 In If OUTLET:49 in II Tel. 978-927-5111 d I h` _ _ 1 INLET D A B INLET D A B 4" V-6"O 3'-0" 2'-6" 8" 5'-0"o 6'-0" 5'-0" NOTES: .. a e . ���8„ 8 5" 3'-6"0 5'-0" 4'-0" 5'-6"x 5'-6" 4'-6" 4--0- NOTES: 11/16 3'-6"x 3'-6" 4'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0 fo 4'-0' 3'-6- 1) • .S ,• 'e ,5 ..Q ,�4 4. I' i n , w , n ®® �- ECONODRAIN 1 THE BASIS FOR THIS DRAWING IS DRAWING STD-1001 n ' . ., ' : ,� ; ;4• ;.., � +' •.., , •: ; �• . •. '•a ' ®�®® # 4'-0" 3'-8" 3'-0" 6'-0"x 6'-0" 3'-0" PREPARED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. OOOODOOOOC) OOOOOo001000 OOOODo00000 00000,00000 ®®®® SERIES 6 6" 4'-0% 4'-0" 3'-0" 2'-6" 6'-6"0 3-6 3-0 BUILDING 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 ®®®®®® TRENCH SYSTEM CLAMPING 4'-6" 3'-0" 2'-6" 6'-6"x 6'-6" 3'-0" 2'-6- F a ® ® BOLT •,� '+ ®® Err • ••a ':. 4 :4 '; : j 4'-0"0 5'-0" 4'-6" 10" 5'-6"0 7'-6" 6'-6" "•' _ _ DOWNSPOUT - STANDARD - I_I. 'I — 4' 4'x640 O„ 4'-0" 3'-6" 6'-0"x 6'-0" 5'-6" 4'-6" PLAN VIEW H-20 CAST IRON GRATE I( -_I _I I� VARIES 4'-6"x 4'-6" 3'-6" 3'-0" , n 6'-0"0 6-6 5'-6" #EG08241 CI A I -III="• ,'III=1 5'-0"0 3'-6" 3'-0" NYLOPLAST CLEANOUT EPS FORM 06 31% OPEN AREA �_� = 5'-o"x 5'-0" 3'-0" 2'-6" 6'—6"x s'-s" 5'-0" 4'-0" FRAME & GRATE 30.2 SQ. INCHES PER LINEAR FOOT EXPANSION / I I <,•' I I_I END CAP ADJUST DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER 24'-0" (FLOW=196 GPM) CONTRACTION INLET PIPE TO BE SIZED BY GRADEINSERTED IN RISER z PLUMBING CONTRACTOR z SLOPED I I I—III =1 I —I I .12 NOTES: FINISHED PIPE -- GRADE � 7 � DRAIN BOTTOM I—I i I=1� �� FOR INLETS LARGER THAN 10" THE III_ 6" BUILT-IN SLOPE (0.50%) = ; " 0.5% TO OUTLET DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS WILL BE 4" ROOF VENTS INJECTION "'' 5 `I. DETERMINED FOR EACH PARTICULAR MOLDED ;.e' a, PRECAS—CAST SEPARATORS A WT 45' BEND •r''•" ` ECONODRAIN INSTALLATION DETAIL o s RE To HAVE �, ' •' ALL SPECIFIED HOLES EITHER CORE— ^' SIDE SECTION VIEW PAVEMENT BORED OR CAST IN PLACE. INJECTION r ' MOLDED WT INJECTION 45' WYE MOLDED WT .�:' 90• BEND TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM CY EXTRA HEAVY C.I. INLET d , L N.T.S. FROM WASH STAND OR � X ' NOTES: 'd' • FLOOR DRAIN < 1/8-LONG ' 1) CONCRETE: 4,000 PSI MIN. ,AFTER 28 DAYS. Q <' BEND C.I. ; "r�;'• 2) ALL REINFORCEMENT PER ASTM C1227-93. I N C.I. TEE GASKETED LCHDPE PIPE (TYP) ;' �� 3) TRENCH DRAINS SHALL BE ECONODRAIN TRENCH DRAIN SERIES #6 OR APPROVED EQUAL j CONNECTION SIZE & SLOPE 4) BAR GRATE COVER PROVIDED BY ECONODRAIN TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM oR APPROVED EQUAL ¢ ov WATER LINE ROOF LEADER PER PLAN 5) SECURE THE TRENCH DRAIN STRUCTURES to prevent floating during concrete placement. — CLEANOUT DETAIL d d,• ' 4 ' 4 OUTLET TO _/ N.T.S. SANITARY SEWER ALL INLET TRAPS TO BE d° o PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE • ° d.' ' EXTRA HEAVY C.I. PIPE WITH 248 CMR 2.00 MIN. ;° fi o !' a 8"POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE; ALUMINUM OR PLASTIC COATED �, 8"SOLID CONCRETE BLOCKS WITH WROUGHT IRON STEPS CAN BE 4 ' • FULL MORTARED JOINTS,HORZ. AND USED. 8 u VERT., PLASTERED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. d'I A, cz_c d L d , PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED SHALLOW LANDSCAPING SHALLOW LANDSCAPING WROUGHT IRON STEPS d' SWALE. MIN. SWALE. MIN. / ° SHALL CONSIST EOF M PARTRT USED CEMENT, 3" DEEP 2.0'f 3" DEEP 2.0' a . ,° . 2 PARTS SAND. 6" TH. 4.0't - 6" TH. 4.0'f / 4. ' d' MIN. 6 TH. LOAM & SEED „ ° ° d.' e , CEMENT BRICK,HOLLOW CONCRETE, OR RIP RAP RIP RAP / ALL DISTURBED SLOPE. " ' ' ' ' CINDER BLOCK MASONRY MUST NOT BE (D50=4") / MIN. 6" TH. LOAM & SEED (D50=4") / CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES USED. / ALL DISTURBED SLOPE. / BIODEGRADEABLE EROSION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE / CONTROL BLANKETS BASIN TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF BUILDING ALL OIL AND GASOLINE MUST BE REMOVED BEFORE 4 10/16/14 REVISE OUTFALL DETAIL. 12" TH. CLEAN ' 24 T i / WHERE POSSIBLE,COVER TO HAVE A CENTER HOLE. CLEANING OUT THE BASIN, AND MUST NOT BE BIODEGRADEABLE EROSION 12 TH. CLEAN ;24 T „ RETAINED SOIL / DISCHARGED INTO THE SEWER THROUGH OTHER FIXTURES. 3 2/30/1 REVISE RIP RAP STONE SIZE GRANULAR FILL f � -'IJ / CONTROL BLANKETS GRANULAR FILL ---� ------------------ / A TIGHT COVER MUST BE USED IF BASIN i 24 M L— —1--' / I / IS LOCATED INSIDE OF BUILDING. SPECIFICATIONS FOR COVERING SPECIAL CASES OR 2 9/10/12 REVISE RETAINING WALL DETAIL. 40 MIL. PVC I / 4" PERF. CHDPE UNDERDRAIN 40 MIL. PVC 24 �------ ----------- ____ 4" PERF. CHDPE UNDERDRAIN " CONDITIONS, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL LINER. SOLVENT / SLOPED TO DAYLIGHT. WRAP - SLOPED TO DAYLIGHT. WRAP OPENING SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 24 DIA. AUTHORITIES, AND THE AUTHORITIES OF THE M.W.R.A. 1 6/20/12 ADD LOW PERMEABLE SOIL TO WELD JOINTS 24 M I W/ MIN. 1 CF/FT OF LINER. SOLVENT ":24 M I REINFORCED SOIL RETAINING WALL DETAIL WALL I / CRUSHED STONE & 8 OZ/SY WALL --�----------------------- CRUSHED STONE 8 OZ SY CONSTRUCTED THAT SURFACE WATER SHALL BE EXCLUDED. APART. 18" No. Date Description RETAINEm SOIL WELD JOINTS W MIN. 1 CF FT OF THE CATCH BASIN SHALL BE SO LOCATED AND WROUGHT IRON STEPS SHALL BE SPACED ABOUT HEIGHT 39 M I / FILTER FABRIC. 12' DRIAINAGE ZONE / HEIGHT •24 M I 3 4 :CRUSHED STONE FIIZTER FABRIC. VARIES I / / " ) INLET PIPE SHALL BE AT LEAST FOUR BOTH VENTS SHALL BE EXTENED INDEPENDENTLY 18" Revisions VARIES ------------ / MAX. 12' � I / 12" DRAINAGE ZONE ..• --r----'------ / INCHES ABOVE NORMAL WATER LINE. ABOVE THE ROOF, OR AS APPROVED BY THE LOCAL ( ) 3.6' 39 M I- / 3 4" CRUSHED (MAX. 18 ) ;24 M AUTHORITIES, AND THE AUTHORITIES OF THE M.W.R.A. ( 3.6' I WHERE SUBJECT TO FROST OR CRUSHING CONDITIONS, / STONE) --r---------- ------------- / OUTLET SHALL BE AT LEAST THREE FEET BELOW THE (Outlet pipe to be 45 degree angle) 45 M // :24 M / SURFACE. I / \_APPROXIMATE LIMITS ------GEOGD DEPTH -I / •, .,' --r----------'------------- / THE NEW CATCH BASIN MUST BE FILLED WITH CLEAN 45 M I / OF EXCAVATION 24 M I WATER BEFORE USING, AND AFTER BEING EMPTIED FOR i I / PERIODIC CLEANING. / _4----------------------- / MDC TRAP �, s 60 M �" �r 24 M ROBERT f / --------------------- N.T.S. �I `sem c rn �' • � ���� GRIF=FIN � a 60 B DRAIN TILE .24 B #civlQ (4" MIN) fi n 66 DIRAIN TILE - _ r� EMBED. _ y EMBED. �� (4» MIN) ,,, , • VARIES VARIES 42 MIN. GRAVITY WALL GEOGRID WALL NOTES: " (MIN.) 16 , /G • W CRUSHED STONE CRUSHED STONE N.T.S. 1) TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN FOR PLANNING BOARD PERMITTING ONLY. HIGH FENCE LEVELING PAD N.T.S. DETAILED DESIGN PLANS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. LEVELING PAD 2) RECON SERIES 50 RETAINING WALL BY SHEA CONCRETE SPECIFIED. REMOVE & RESET (MIN. 12" THICK) RETAINING WALL (MIN. 12" THICK) OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY TEXTURE. MIN. 4" TH. EXISTING GRANITE TYPICAL SECTION 3) MINIMUM 10% WALL EMBEDMENT OR 6", WHICHEVER IS GREATER. LOAM & SEED STONE WALL & OW 90 AW 4) DRAIN TILE TO DAYLIGHT (OR YARD DRAIN) AT LOW POINTS, ENDS, AND CAP STONE N.T.S. MIN. 50' O.C. TOP = EL. 9.6' GriFrin 5) UNDERDRAIN TO DAYLIGHT (OR YARD DRAIN) AT LOW POINTS & ENDS 12"f TH. REINFORCED Eng/neenng CONCRETE TOP Group, LLC COMPACTED 34" �� SLAB 30'-0"f CRUSHED STONE `'�" a 2"x 2" HARDWOOD POST EROSION CONTROL FABRIC BACKFILL ° • ; °' ° , ' 4 P.O BOX 7061 MIN. LENGTH OF 4' (MIRAFI NO. 100 OR EQUAL).- 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G a TEMP. Beverly, MA 01915 10 OZ/Sy 1 x COFFERDAM WALL AT 6' MAX. O.C. STAPLE TO POST AT 6" O.C. . VERTICALLY. NON-WOVEN / TOP = EL. 10.0± Tel: 97 - 27- GEOTEXTILE 8 9 5111 VTEMP. COFFERDAM WALL. FILTER FABRIC • �° TOP = EL 10.0± 5 -o Q Fax: 978-927-5103 5'-0"f - w 2"x 2"x 30" 12'-0" �,� TOP OF `� o MRM PROJECT 2.5' .MIN 28„ HARDWOOD STAKES 24 CHDPE TOP WIER CURB MANAGEMENT LLC IN EACH HAYBALE. - 5 WIDE OUTFALL PIPE DRIVE 6" TO 12" IN OPENING 6',r GROUND. � i® ,�;,�,`����„Fi: � ,fir a ' 12"± STREAM SALEM, MA 5 Min. � :,i,,\ ,,, ,,�, 12"t TH. BASE. , (u.N.o.) '`` :.,`i, , - ; BED . //�� APPROX. LIMIT a ° 4 OF EXCAVATION ° 61P A COMPACTED 6" TH. 7 1.5 Min. EXCAVATE SHALLOW I , I �/ MONOLITHIC ° CRUSHED STONE TRENCH BY HAND & I ( lh/ I �I� 6,-0„ REINFORCED Q 12"f TH. LEVELING PAD DETAILS III BACK FILL AFTER CONCRETE WALLS 2» INSTALLING FABRIC / I BUTT BASE SLAB ° (TYP) TABLE OF ELEVATIONS (FT - NGVD) TIGHTLY MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF OUTFALL #1 OUTFALL #2 SECTION VIEW TOGETHER EXISTING STONE WALL. STEAM BED 0.8f 2.1± REPLACE STONES & CHINK . ° PRECAST TOP OF BASE SLAB 1.3 2.6 SILT FENCE HAYBALE ALL VOIDS AS REQ D. I a a ° REINFORCED TOP OF WEIR 1.8 3.1 OUTFALL DETAIL SCale:• 1"=40' EROSION CONTROL MORTAR ALL VOIDS WITHIN ' ° ' CONCRETE PIPE INVERT IN 4.0 4.10 N.T.S. 5' OF CONCRETE BOTTOM OF TOP SLAB 6.3 7,6 NOTES: fob No, 700 1 N.T.S. STRUCTURE. 3'-6" 1) STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PRECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURE TO BE PROVIDED C- 8 i I APPROX. FINISH GRADE 9.6f 9.6t BY SUPPLIER. SUBMIT TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CASTING. Fie Name: p/p/s/h-b r7 24"� CHDPE_,,-"" PLAN VIEW 2) COFFERDAM DESIGN BY OTHERS. MAX. 5'x30' AREA REQUIRED IN RIVER. OUTFALL PIPE Q� 12/20/11 3% MIN. SLOPE (TOP) TEMPORARY 33% MAX. SLOPE (SIDES) EROSION CONTROL 6't 4' VEGETATIVE SURFACE (GRASS) FABRIC (U.N.0) ,ail, ,�li, ali, ,�li, ,li, .�li, ,�li, ,�I►, al►, ,\2 '�S�QPOS���G"( TEMPORARY \LL EROSION CONTROL �2' P vLPR F FABRIC (U.N.0) DEFINING LAYER. GRN 12 TH. VEGETATIVE 12 PLACE STRIPS OF 4' WIDE SUPPORT LAYER 6" TH. TOPSOIL P> ORANGE SNOW FENCE--\ (K MAX. = 7x1 0cm/sec) E E \� AT 10' O.C. L S\- E � RELOCATED Op < S\0 S� S� 1 CRUSHED MATERIAL CELL xX X x x x x STONE 6, SUBGRADE PREPARATION7 3% MPE SURF PGE 4 12" TH. DRAINAGE LAYER 40-MIL HDPE 31-0" 2' 2 LAYER (6" MIN. TH.) vGE�Pw SELECT GRANULAR FILL (TEXTURED) (K MIN. = 1x10-2 cm/sec) BARRIERsec.�,•,i''""�'' ,�\�' GE �P R ) \ 12 / �E \'P� Cfo 40-MIL HDPE -NON-WOVENO SEE ANCHOR 40-MIL HDPE �2' vPppR�1p I (TEXTURED) ��\�� S �x (TEXTURED) 6" TH. SUBGRADE PREPERATION LAYER GEOTEXTILE TRENCH DETAIL ' BARRIER SCREENED GRANULAR FILL (3/8" MINUS) LIMIT OF CONTAMINATED I ' P\Np,G PR F eco p,1\ON M\WS) SOILS 2, �N 0 R PNo Z cm�s S QREP�R 1 SS\�EG � �X1 vgGRp,Ov�PR F\ 6" 1N N NEO GR N BARRIER TOE DETAIL SGREE N.T.S. RELOCATED MATERIAL CELL RESTORATION PLANTING SCHEDULE AREA PLANTS SIZE SPACING UNLINED BOTTOM OF CELL. RIVERFRONT RESTORATION 72 EACH OF SILKY PLANT 4 FEET ON CENTER IN A EXCAVATE EXISTING SOIL AREA (6,000 SF) - REMOVE DOGWOOD (CORNUS 2-3 FEET HIGH 10-FOOT WIDE STRIP ALONG 2RELOCATED DOWN TO ELEV 11.0f SLUDGE BEDS. REPLACE AMMOMUM) AND SAND BAR THE TOP OF' RIVER BANK WITHIN MATERIAL CELL AND COMPACT SUBBASE. EXCAVATED MATERIAL WITH WILLOW (SALIX EXIGUA) THE RIVERFRONT RESTORATION CLEAN FILL. PROVIDE AREA MINIMUM 8 INCHES OF BTM = 11.0+ LIGHTLY COMPACTED TOPSOIL. 20 EACH OF RED MAPLE SPACED EVENLY THROUGHOUT RESTORE TO ORIGINAL (AGER RUBRUM) AND 6 FEET TALL THE REMAINING RIVERFRONT COMPACTED SUBBASE GRADES - ELEVATION QUAKRNG ASPENPOPULUS RESTORATION AREA MATERIAL 9.0+ ( COMPACTED SELECT M / TREMUILOIDES) (LIMIT OF i I GRANULAR FILL PLANT WILLOW SHRUBS AND 20 EACH OF MEADOWSWEET GEOMEMBRANE SIKLY DOGWOOD SHRUBS SPIREA TOMENTOSA BLACK INSTALL UNIFORMLY ALONG BANK TO ENHANCE ( )� 2-3 FEET TALL THROUGHOUT THE REMAINING ESHWT EL. 8.7f ® MIGRATORY FUNCTION OF THE CHOKEBERRY (ARONIA RIVERFRONT RESTORATION AREA LIMIT OF LOST BANK. MELONIOCARPA), ARROWWOOD CONTAMINATED (VIBURNUM DENTATUM) SOILS TYPICAL ENGINEERED PLANT REMAINING SHRUBS `7 AND TREES TO RESTORE AND NEW ENGLAND EROSION APPLY AT ONE-HALF BARRIER SECTION STABILIZE RIVERFRONT CONTROL/RESTORATION MIX SEED MIX SUPPLIER'S RECOMMENDATION - 2 10/16/14 REVISE PROPOSED LAYOUT IN RESTORATION AREA. FOR HOIST SITES** USE APPROXIMATELY 2.5 REMEDIATION AREA. ADD N.'T.S. (OR DQUAL) POUNDS FOR ENTIRE ANCHOR TRENCH DETAIL LANDSCAPING ALONG PATH. RESTORATION AREA. N.T.S. 1 4/25/13 ADD BACKFILL MATERIAL SPECS ** SEED MIX IS AVAILABLE FROM NEW ENGLAND WETLAND PLANTS, AMHERST, ;SIA 413-548-8000 TO REMEDIATION AREA NOTES. , �_,�, �. ,. / No Date Description Revisions G v�� � ���.� ' ,- -� --- - REMEDIATION A -- �� �- 8 B ( 3 HARMONY GROVE RD ) SCALE: 1"=30' c 1 / J NOTE: �,��,, a na•,p / �� 12 VC 1) REMEDIATION WORK TO BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S LSP. ALL ,1`�,� ROSERT °''- 5�f 5 50 V, 10�-� /� , s -� REMOVED MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED PER OWNERS LSP REQUIREMENTS. GRIFFIN / OUTFALL 2) BEDS AND BUILDINGS TO BE EXCAVATED AND IMMEDIATELY BACKFILLED WITH CLEAN Z � avlL P 1=4.3i- GRANULAR FILL MEETING MHD SPEC. M1.01:0 (No ALLOWED). RESTORE FINISH f° �` #36ss6 ERI�I0,f�- / BANK#7 I �A 1` GROUND SURFACE WITH 12 LAYER OF PLANTABLE TOPSOIL MEETING MHD SPEC. M1.05.0.IS CONTR=OL-5 & � � 3) TOPSOIL SHALL HAVE A MAX. PERMIABILITY OF 5x10-4 CM/SEC (REF. ASTM D2434). 2'-6" % y --- 4) REFER TO RESTORATION PLANTING SCHEDULE PREPARED BY WETLANDS & LAND P U_I �T OF WOR � BA MANAGEMENT, INC. OF DANVERS, MA. `�' LUG EXIST. DIS-TURBANCE j�: .5 1.7 . CONNECTION NOR TH �� SEE N OTE 2 R1 VER CANAL TIDAL \ 6\ GROUND SURFACE —� AN�{ ( ._ ) i 'r / � 2.3 — WOOD c4c METAL ,� 1.9 .., , REMOVE FORMER SLUDGE I, - — # 14 _ BRIDGE W/ 8 PIPE BED (15x100'f). WOOD EROSION CONTROLS Gritrin /` If SLOPING CONCRETE �B AN K 4 y - + PAD �8 �,-- - X1.9 i --- — — _DECK SEL. 9.2_ SIDES TO REMAIN & LIMIT OF WORK/ y Engineering PROP. 10 WIDE — — _ �-- -� . .z" BANK#7 — .— = ---=-- = ._ --- _ — � — — --� ---- _ ; Group LLC „ / �� �'! ,� � -__- — — — ' DISTURBANCE_ _ , 3 -0 6 LENGTH OF I „ i /� LAWN STRIP ,�� ® ® � --- .�,� —---- 1 PVC NON-SCREENED ® •�� r��� �4____ —\ 6" I.D. STEEL �� 3 - v I I( i I� ® 0`3 f ` \ 5 — — P.O BOX 7061 RISER (SCH. 40) REMOVE FORMER (TYP) = RED MAPLE �p �� _ __ BA q�\ CASING I � � — �' '\ PRE-TREATMENT (TYP OF 10 \ 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G �� - 2' MIN. BENTONITE /� '�- BAIT _ — �A(�}1� — ---� Beverly, MA 01915 /� I� #-r-- cRouT SEAL BASIN (11x30 ) �c �-� ALONG ATH) RESTORE. WOOD / BANK#1 -. Tel: 978-927-5111 NON-SCREENED �/j ® .` - �\ Fax: 978-927-5103 SCREENED 1 PVC SCREENED SIDES TO RE / �- 8 \\ RISER (SCH. 40) 8C / /� MH 6,000 SF BOREHOLE ORK/ -CQ�� �` FM —� FM FM RESTORATION \�� MRM PROJECT 4 1 » rJ �� �/ \ � " (6" DIAMETER) CE cQ FORCE MAINPLANTING AREA \\\ _ MANAGEMENT, LLC - �K�6 �' '�-' � SALEM, MA Q _ AREA OF FORMER EROSION CONTROLS & GRANULAR \ PACKING _ SETTLING BUILDING. TES \, wcn LIMIT OF WORK/ DISTURBANCE ASTM C33 NO.-\ ___ --- — g 67 - TOR 0.1 ; I I I I I ISI I�5MS�IVE AS IREQ'D. f -H=f . TRACKS -H-4-H-I - -H- -H ► I I I I ► I-I }-H-� --f-H-I-I--1 -H-�-I �-I-I +-H-H 111 1 H-�-Hd-H-H y Joe DETAILS V _11116SCREW FITTING^ -� '- -- — — ---� --1x8 — 1 ('�\ REMEDIATION DETAILS CAP y ::„,: — \ �' � 2X - 10 5 \ GROUNDWATER — P0TE.NTJA-L-SLU\ DGam` BED �\� _ HP _ _ - - - 700 NOTE: ---- — 20x 30=: TEST & x f ---1 D p D D D D D D \ w �Qk�l. MONITORING WELLS TO BE MONITORING N I TO R I N G WELL - - ( ) , \ p D �- D D D , C O INSTALLED UNDER THE SUPERVISION _ REMOVE AS `REQ D. e a • p/p/s/n-b OF THE OWNER'S LICENSED SITEN.T.S. X3 / - p 3 PROFESSIONAL (LSP) OF RECORD. \ \ y� / / \ , 3/ 1/1 REVISIONS _ W 0r- REV # DATE BY: U r Q r 2 LL 1 1 0/ 1 4/ 1 1 J. P. RDA J ko ❑ O Q \/E a • 2 4/ 1 2/ 1 2 J J . P R. / G I `O' " W 3 EXIST. Q NI ON WAY 50 - Z 1 1 /6/1 2 J . B. CURB CUT I'I A (PtJgUC _ \ ❑ F- (ff = _ W 4 9/ 16/ 14 J . B. lam , 25' WIDE SB/DH I W SEWER (HLD LINE) EASEMENT Z J I � ❑ J C,R / / / U7 °'0 / --MAP 16 LOT 377 \ \ 3 N/F SB/DH \ (1) • M HARMONY GROVE FND & HLD \ r CORP. MAP 16 LOT 238 ■ GRp.\`\\�i �o.o o.o o.o o.o o / \ N/F \ r n / / / \ \ 50 � STREET EST, ALLC O \ ■ b.o j.o�.0 + . NORTH RIVER CANAL - TIDAL LAD COURTPLAN 3381LL WOOD & METAL � o o.o o.o o.o BRIDGE W/ 8" PIPE DECK= EL. 9.1± \ "ice O/ • EXISTING + \ ■-J. s m 0 CROSSING o.o o.0 0 0.0 EASEMENT b.o b 1.o EXISTING b.o BRIDGE �vIAP 16 LOT 378 ABUTMENTS -vim` �• o. o.o o.o o 0.0 0.o o.0 0.o c.0 0.o o.o o 0.0 0 0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.o 0.o 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.o 0.o 0.0 o.o 0. 0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 b.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.o o. o.o o.o o.o b.o 0.0 b.o 0.0 0.0 b.o b.o b.o 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 b.o o.o b.o b.o 0.0 0 b.o 0.o b.o 0.o N ---�- O !Im .11 44-1V L HARMONY��ROV� � - - - COF P. - ' - o- - o a) 44wr.V�ALU-w 0 0 + .1 +0.1 +0.1 0.1 + .0.- 0--0 -"D•'t1-0-0 b.0 0.l 0.1 1 0. + .1 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.l p/1 Y0.1 0.1 0.1 +0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.o 0.0 b.1 0.1 t).1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 \+0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cr, J U RAMC S TRANSPOR TA TION R.R. TRACKS AUTHORITY \ \ ,�..� b.o b.o + 1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 �.Y + + t + _ _ _ _ - - _ _ SS HUSETT� - - - - _ _ MA A� W a� O + + + + + + + + + , + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .F + + 0.5 0.2 0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1. 1.�1.T-}l.�rl.��l.�r1. 12. �r1.�1. - 1�8� 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.2 .41 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.2 0.3 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.5 2.2 1.7 1.4 2.2 1.8 0. 0. .2 0.2 0.1 0.o �,� em6 • \ rfJ - .1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.o 0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 o.9 1.8 3 3� 3.6 1.1 8 1.2 1.7- 2.6 .9 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.8 4 2.0 o.9 0.5 0. .\ 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 AN+T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 o.o +0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.3 �.3 2.1 4 4 2.3 0.5 0.4 b. 0.4 0.2 0.1 _ _� � EBL K 0.1 0.9 1.2 .1 2.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.0 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.9 +1.-e 1. 9 .1 1 4 + 0.1 0.0 0.0 b.o 0.0 0.0 0 bo b. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + .0 1 0.7 +0.2 0.3 0. 6 0.5 b2 C'j7 O QW _ U a + + + + + + + + + + t + + . . + + + 'o. + + t + i + GRANI T + + + + + EL 9.6-{.. , + , \ + \+ C '► 0.2 0.6 2.1 .8 2.6 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.0 2.4 4.7 3.8 2.4 0.9 0.6 9 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 8 0.7 0.7 0. 1.,2 2.2 2.3 2.21.7 1.0 0.6 0.8�0.�-0.1 1BL0t� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o EXISTING i.7 0.6 0.2 0.6 1.2 1.0 0.2 .1 K r. I � I ` BI RE WALL A+ OFFI CE \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ♦ + + + R + + + r 0.2 0.6 3.1 .9 3.4 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.4 1.1 3.1 X7.5 5.8 2.7 0.7 0. 0.3 0.2 1. 9 4.0 2.7 3.7 2.3 3.3 2.d�1.0 IT5P T O.�A�3 0.3 TQ 1 0 0 1 0.�' 10�jy 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0. BUILDING 1.5 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.2 \`1.3 0.3 0.1 1 # � E�' 9.6-* �/W 41? CAANA \ \ 1- r PROPOSED BUILDING 1 + , �- + � ' + + t + + +--� , 0.2 0.6 2.2 .9 2.4 1.0 +0.9 0.3 0.4 +0.9 1.9 +2.6 2.9 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.7 / 4 + .1 2.0 4. 5.2 3.9 2.8 1.� 5 2.2 0.9 0.4 0.4 X0.2 0.2 + . 0.3 0.9 0.3 0:AL0.� / 0.0 o.° b. RAN/ °.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.9 1.5 3. �3 0.2 0.1 W GARAGE UNDER _'2 � �'qL �� BLACK \ y + + t + + + + , t + + (47-UNITS) , + + _ �- + + , + + RST. W, + + + 0.1 0.9 1.4 8 2.9 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0. 2 2.1 1. 2.8 3.2 3.3 1.8 1.78•.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5�_5 0.3 + 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.o 0.1 0.1 0 1.3 1.6 7 0.2 b.l 0 0 LIN PROPOSED BUI ® GRAN W - EL. 9. - - - + + + , + + , + t + + + + W BUILDING + + + + + + + + + + _ + + + + 6-+ + + + 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 0. 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.9 0 9 0.5 1 1.7 1.1 0. 1.9 4 Gq RA N G #2 1.2 0.7 1.5 1.8 1.7 2.��'.6_1.9 0.7 1.0 0.6�a.2 0.2 '-(L QO L` 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0. 0. .1 0.1 0.0 1 G k° UNI E UNDER -- BI P�' � SET. ALAn (47_ T ER �+ KE q T i W L +0.1 0.2 0. + 2 0.3 1.0 6 1.8 0. 2.3 2.3 6. + M , TQ + + + ` , 0.0 S� 1.5 0.9 0.7 3.4 4.4 2.6 3.5 2.�1 9�1.=_1=0.4�.4�_` .SEL 0.� 6 .3 0.1 0 �.Q-- 0= 0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.o 0.0 +0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 3.3 +2.9 1.3 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.. 5 + +1.7 - •+ �+ �+ 'n 4 5.9 3.3 2.5 1.7 217�� 0.9 0.3 0.2 1t1� =1 0 0 0.0 .0 W b.o o.o b.o b.c o.oSTQN VJ ERET WALL + + + + + , +1.9 + + + + + + , + , + + + + + + + + PROP + + + �t , + + + + ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.5 1.9 .1 0.8 + 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0..4 0.8 1.2 0.9 0.1 0.1 0 .0 6.3 1. 1.2 3. Q 9.3 3.1 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.-1�0.1 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. ❑ +o t�1AP �6 +d�T +°2�,7 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.o o.o o.o SED BCI( 0�ARN/F 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.1 + 0 2.0 2.1 1.7 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0:.�- + 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 b.2 +0.1 0.1 1 + + 2.0 + 1.6 6 2 Wj GARAGE VNDG #3 i.3 + .2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 r�S o.o o.o b.o o.o b.o o.o o.o b.o b.o b.o +o�°� - (47�UNrTs ER 1 O + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.0 1.9 2. ' 4.2 2.0 1.3 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.'0 + ..1 + 1.1 0.6 0.59 O.S 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.2 0.2 + 1.9 0-3k 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 + 0.0 0.0 • - 0.0 ^ ^ �0 _0.0 0 0 0.-0.._ �0 0.c#6 0.0 0�.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .,� � 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.7 ai 1.1 + + + + 0 1.5 1.0 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.1 2.0 0.6 0. 0.5 0.7 0.9 +0.9 +0.5 0.8 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.2 0. + 2 0 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0. 2 0.1 0.0 p 0 b.o b.o b.o bS/LoVE \ o.o +°.0 b.o +o.o M6?oo 19.oLOT.o21�.o b o 1 1 - (PUBLIC WAY N/F + + + + + + + + '2 + + + t + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + 10. + + + + + + + + + ❑ C 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.5 2.2 .9 1.6 1.1 1.2 2.3 2.5 2..1 1.2 1.1 1. 1.9 1.1 1.8 1.3 1.1 9 1.3 .4 1. 1 1.6 1.1 1.2 0.6 0.8 5 0.7 0.5 0.4 1. 0.9 1.2 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.0 +h o + + + t + + + + + + F 0 E j + o -o.o o��o.4- b-o a.A o.o o _ . _MAP 16 LaT 3761��o - + + + + t t + , + + + + + + + + + + , + , + - v + O _ 0.9 1.9 2.5 1.6 1.1 1. 1.4 1.1 1.4 2.1 9 1.2 1.6 1-3 1.7 1.2 1.6 0.9 1.0 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.2 1 1.1 1.9 2.3 30 1.4 0.7 0.4 0.0+ + + + + b.o b.o 01�/Fb�.° b.o b. E + + +o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 d .o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o.o o.o b.o o.MAR.o16 o.o o.o b.o 0.0 b.o o.o o - - `� FLORETS LOT 225 + + + 8 0.8 1.2 •2.1 1.9 1.3 1.2 1.9 + + + + + + + + + + 9 2.6 3.1 1.4 0.7 0 F+- 0.0 0 o.o b.o o.o o.o b.o o.0 0.o b.o b).o 41 o.o 0 o J o.o b.o b.d o + o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o N+ Fo o. +o.o +o. + .o o.o +o. b.o o. o.o a - - z - �°�� 1�AFp'�6 1 I TUCKER �vIAP 16 4� �_ SHED SHED®rri m 11- 2 I LOT 223 1 + + + + + + + + + t + + + 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 + 0.0 +O 0 + + + + I 1 I �OT 227 + + _ _ - - 0.9 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.7 2.5 2.7 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.6 2.1 2.3 1.2 0.8 \\ 0 ���►° 0 MAPo16o. o.oN�Fo o.o 0.o o.o 0.o 0.0 b.o o.i o.o 0.I o.�/p.o o. o.o o.o o.o I o.o POND \\• MAP 16 A&N REAL I " + + + + + + + + LOT 222 + + + , + + + LAWSON + , + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 • \ b.o 0.o o.o o.o b.o o.o o.o o.hOTo.22Cb•o o.o Y. 0.o �p o o OSTA-T b.o o.o 0.o o. 0.0 0.o o. o.o 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o b.o o.o Ro4S o.o o.o b.o e.o o.o o.0 0.o o. o.o Fb o °'o 0.o o.o o.o o.o �� 39x • 8 WALL °. o. N/F v KOHLOFER TRUST o + + + t + I + + + o. + t MAP +16 � + + + , t L + o.o o.o o.o o.ol o.o o.o o.o �LA�NpE�b.o I o.om .o + . bl.o 0.0 0.o b.o Lcb� 0.0 0.o b.o b o b -o 0 0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o 0.0 �.0 I +oM�P q�O LB�o 20S0o °"R4A,�•o16 0.0 0.0 + o.o b.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 + .o b.o �o b.o o.o o + .o b.o o.0 0 0 64 X0.0 o.a b.o Q I I #44 I N/F ► Q MAP 16 LOT 229 Q N/F I LOT 231 I ° MAP 16 LOT 232 I BIT. CONC. PARKING 2. 0.0 +0. ++�8 .0 0.0 0.0 0.oZ 0 0.o 0. +d.0 0.0 0.0 0.� �( NLf�lo 0 0 0.0 0.0 01.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 IQ 0.0 0.0 0. �0 I 0.0 + + 0 0.0 N 0.0 0.0 + . + 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + 0 + .0# b.0 0.0 Q I °i D AELYL• y N�f° p N/F 1 M4�1� 16 A-AP Id 0 40 ► BASH ROSS#20 I MYERS I L o #10 LOT 380 LOT 235 U J # � BIT. I +o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.d b.o b.o o.o 0.o 0. b.o .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0..o.o o.a + 0 0.0 0 o A o.16 '�qT ��4 o o !N/F o.o o.o o. + .o o.o + .o ����....a CONC. �' ARA` f6 N/F PATSON PA�TTIS � *- I #14 1 LOT 233 + MCSWIGGIN + t t Q - - - - _ _ o.o °.o o.o o. 0.0 0 0 0.o °.o 0 o.o 0 GRANITE CURB - _ - - ° - - I :SPERIDAKOS _ Q BEA VER S TREE T - - - IL \ GRAN. (PUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE POST - - - FND Q w ■ ❑ r Calculation Summary 1 Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min PtSpcLr PtSpcTb Q APARTMENT PARKING AND DRIVE Fc 1 .20 7.5 0 .1 12 .00 75 . 00 15 15 WL COMMERCIAL PARKING Fc 1 . 03 6.3 0 . 1 10 .30 63 . 00 Q Luminaire Schedule WLS8407 HARMONY GROVE APARTMENTS SALEM, MA PM: HOLLY PLEASE CALL US FOR PRICING AT 1-800-633-8711 Symbol Qty Label Lumens LLF Description 0 1 A 14000 0 . 800 WLS-HP-S-5-150-CMH-FG 20 ' MOUNTING HEIGHT O BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, ALL DIMENSIONS AND LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS W SHOWN REPRESENT RECOMMENDED POSITIONS. THE ENGINEER AND/OR ARCHITECT 1 B 14000 0. 800 WLS-HP-S-3-150-CMH-FG 20 ' MOUNTING HEIGHT w MUST DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF THE LAYOUT TO EXISTING OR FUTURE FIELD CONDITIONS. 16 C 14000 0 . 800 WLS-HP-S-3-150-CMH-FG 20 ' MOUNTING HEIGHT '^ THIS LIGHTING PATTERN REPRESENTS ILLUMINATION LEVELS CALCULATED FROM LABORATORY DATA TAKEN UNDER CONTROLLED (CONDITIONS UTILIZING CURRENT 16 D 14000 0 . 800 WLS-WMA-S-3-150-CMH-FG 16 ' MOUNTING HEIGHT INDUSTRY STANDARD LAMP RATINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY APPROVED METHODS. ACUTAL PERFORMANCE OF ANY MANUFACTURERS LUMINAIRE MAY VARY DUE TO VARIATION IN ELECTRICAL VOLTAGE, TOLERANCE IN LAMPS AND OTHER VARIABLE FIELD CONDITIONS.