The URL can be used to link to this page

1,3,5 HARMONY GROVE RD, 60,64 GROVE ST - PLANNING (10) ' - ii = a� t _ — — �, � � s = � _ �. :. � ., . ._ .;fi` . � . _ .. _ . i'r � 5 A v � �_ .� 1. .' .. .. v '-�� . _ -. ... •. r' I Correspondence i ' I SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW n 63 FEDERAL STREET RE(01, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 li CI"""`b v6 l�„ 1 JOHN R. SERAFINI, 6R. MAR 2TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING JOSEPH C. CORRENTI Di PT. QF PL4,NNiiv',9,.B-744-0212 A4 SIMILE CQ0.hfi5UhllY D-- y'791`741-4663 March 21, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Danielle: As requested in connection with the above project, enclosed please find one color set of the project presentation slides. If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, jose6plh C. Correnti Enclosures SERAFINI , DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 June 1, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Danielle: For your records, enclosed please find a colored copy of the Power Point presentation that was displayed at the Planning Board meeting on Thursday, May 17, 2012. If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly your ^ Joseph C. Correnti Enclosures !ZqP4 <<a u Tek R a j .,� Td� «• I' `�`� II m 4rl rt b s� w Y n �--_ a ^ '�£+ � S P 'rr.:s.. a•msaas..c. �-'C�y�2°�y4#� �:.�a �F� � � •i .•� ^ rr^ ^nor. �''� a� rw *.`T y • rr n ! rr^u:J�nr�n. �i►�'•*' PreaI Oroz Pr ±� •>-- _cat, _ � _ _ ,� - ' ` . t LEGACY PARK APARTME NTS SALEM " to " Presented by: " MRM Project Management, LLC & The Federated Companies _ 60-64 Grove Street/3 Harmony Grove May 201 2 Salem,Massachusetts Scale r'=40 �.�- """- v '�+.�" { e•r`•. u n A,m TG a .& i. °ro+"I 4i6 ;' ?.��e e •` 9 �,� r`y, f`r`ar2Lti., ' v ".0 'baa HARMONY"Rp BaerM BIKB cANa.- none BAY � IBANSPBRTAnBN AUiBORIlY„„ — .i C4N., �,.✓icC� '� i 1C` � Il �0.n1 �.. ail:.wm" I� \ �, � �� _—'tet=�a-•r` _momvatx�s_�� ""` •.tea., .� •-_j��jx_��y �_�``r�:�.._a �f.cam= � _ •� . . �9 i"n+x°"a'°a. 1 � J�.��\y0\ al I....y 4 - II IN � v .BEAVER STREET � I I W� - wn wn 1440 i.n SECTION A k n � SECTION sucp-�o' n o m r n SECTION C nw v n",x1 ws J"asis�' '" wiS, ryr, NeMtkuYBWW�' Y* hn 'u`y°`yM", ri fkt ,s Existingat A xS ✓ f5 i W r ;- ll �.` _ p K`.nA'x� ^:ri x��w_ 11 44,C `.;�:.� • .� , �.. . :, �y s �.. _ . eta r �9 I ' .-1 — vim,:,. •.� r yr �{ 'y��''.Y'na. s .w r'a't�'".,4h�, .k%1 �f'lEV£� .YC•�S ��'F Y"�, V K r" 1T$ o-a v9i• r. :.ry kd?v.. >k§ .e' r -x. ,^', u,�p -Y .T.' e"4 !,En. ��Y � y.`ygx "��.� wu � r ° •Sect�onA� -�r �PartI e• - r "' . •r �iir _ a z t r y � 111 " lY'..• xrr { f�� ' r ♦R 20'J 24-00 .,PYi�aMYY1y/Mty •-� lb Y N h i s a '° � n � ��,�" � ° 5ection�. A�� Part 11 .2 Y s" 7 MFF'! ,•. ., �°T+`• •I ji •a I •• I •• a •• 41 MOW a�.;�'�` / c X gtr l �g. °*Y "�'�`��aarx"+* .+e�+ p1�J.Jy+i ;u rs e baa , tox=,_'✓' r e c Sectx� on.,t i -� Part 1 `fes 1X.^'3" 'j£ \ �� { iq � �?t Yt 4 5• z r r .axe - x x f gt +1111 1 ��t•� a ;i . au. .., tts "= ,�'w„"v E3 BVI r. ' 3 10 l ' �Y t 0+00 a 0 00 i s j # rn [ & ` � ��t`5. � Y?^' ;id '.4 { +, k`5 iF j` 's�rc'F $L✓" f,"#& t k'�. ,*e5 s k r s s.M x a� .Y <'.14 y a , r 'ao �^ x � +�% � r�'S +,� k 1'd .•+ � 4 p}'i. I p � , 3xr: �# R•': ti v Q k 4 � J F k >• f kF rtL F .,w "4F l n' .`s:",a ,�...�.3., t.+e�r 4 c .. �a ,✓#.`: n ,s@+, ,.is >..,,t a s a4o„•-,. ^� ° hI - s r F " p4 a S t�.II ng fat �C •? Lfi V�.`w+i 54b.i3'Ee`$kiir �t:Ftr.YEP? `4"*`i. �l Mammo— �! ju: 9 mi Y"'.MI• Y .. t< s A ..NII iy �''k-Jtt w I a 0 YN a S � � ^�^ yy., .yq:{ J it�t3R➢1 cL- y y� h a .t P 3 'r.� htl 6 ri . .ni+T uu 4h • i 4 tt I a •• yp^Y 9 s ,.3Fn ... n ,rtywa,• r 30'! W . `�.. _ • �I i. e 1 1 1 11 a+60 11 1 11 F Y �th'��'°n H'e N��,k'�* '� ��r akr `i3t'E"^ b V , � '1° < Se, t �on °C = Peart 11 4 x d +.9 - "z ss+.= 67*a .a M G u A} „ ff Y{ 4 &BOAI�I=I i -m SIF P7, •9 e •0 so 0 . '43^ a r r v t ° a 120 110 90 . .. .. 80 70 KBO Q. IYITERIIUAL { +r+.-➢.},r`• �,. Q, .�i�. CRNM. .. � _ 50 >. 40 •�Wi �tt . 30 .. PROPOSED ...e. .. .... . ..... .PRb7 WA NOM..,.. •- 20'. r e ;WAW _. . ... ..:. .. . .. �...... y _ PATH ._. . - ...... ,. ., . 0 Ir SM, —10 ME-00 - 34-50 4+00 :4+50 5+00 5+50 ✓�.,r*�"1� k �v � .k 5s"��`°'x s a a < .ap� qr, x frt.. I+. >. y x� e #S� xF �,atix}.?' gx' ix 4i t s � 4' 4'"", a. 9t $ *,rac .}`'a•, 3 r -. a MRM Project Management, LLC Beverly.MA Federated Companies Bogon.MA View from Main Entries Brian Beaudette Architect 6 ■.■ 0 0 ■0 0 1 a'cccc HE If MMENIOXW, m 0 OR 9#m Wok Building#1 Building#2 Building 43 x w � wit i as C i i,t,44� �.. "7�`d�,"'ny"'+yr..� 1 .y is e 5 ai:- ✓ }"a xj � � � ,. �5u � J w +sem'0 x- ,,•��r.°, u��.u-,��.•�a�`,� x� °" MRM Project Management,LLC Beverly.MA Federated Companies Boston.MA View from Canal Brian Beaudette Architect ■®■Bal!!! SQO @@88 NUM61,c a 98 ac .. Building#3 Building#2 Building#I sr � � h G n 4 y II y�;,i,, 3'C� S+y� `��•< k`a"�#� ,�„`�,4v� -".1x �k�""as"a� tt�'�a�,y�-� �:a:. bit � �r. � � i �I �� i y I t MRM Project Management, LLC Beverly,MA Federated Companies Boston.MA _— Brian Beaudette Architect Canal Side I t'll Side Main Gntry Side Building#I a>�m a = T- A MRM Project Management, LLC Beverly.MA NO Federated Companies Boston.NIA Brian Beaudette Architect Canal Side Side Win Entry Sid Building#2 i b K A } L44 ' �#'y ��++i��a�+m a"'" 'e V 4 x� t7�. w wf `a As•�"' "r it a: :..» i*,�3", .t.+}' MRM Project Management, LLC Beverly.MA - Federated Companies no>um.MA Brian Beaudette Architect CaOal Side Side Main Entn, Side Building#3 ' arc .�'�F✓^�t� �* .�" � � 'x N r xy`1'vv�w ,y<Sx�',",.a }',:• 'j, . 4" j k`•.- a��,.+ �' x s ':x k 'x a,�=?a 1 "r5 6.w r .•.�& aa�.x. �... m.4°` x. I t d '' T r =_�'r z' -"w � x:'S' a.o- �i ,"'R�,�5 y t :k q C IJI Irtlir,lif,. III II1=1 . yy ° �. _ p! �q„q =�-n' _`rra — — •�`r7- i = da,. --'n” �II', `.e: � m�g` H L _. \ L `-I 11eP8M�e¢BCaipWPa L' W5Aman 8ft mne MaM P pd Memycmrnl 3 B y Po Sox 188 _ ° p _a � attv1Y•M�01915 i °1'.1° Legacy Park •� Apartments Building#t I) � •r _ ��1. 2-1, ��.t®' I� •qtly ��. PreLmuury r - I 1 '/ .¢ .. 1_e.• `� �•` V =t.. J rca2!• �-rr al.rn- _,a�• tcu. -T' c — - - ; r�u!• .�[J�.. _ .; .ee:= oy: FbaPhu A1.1 '. xT '" �w �r x = r" Y+ �, 2^'S vsz ti P o- xwn i�.'' ,.,re.� � ,r`,✓ $ 3`&' ' -r�`�we,.y�)y� �1 g� " 1;� �� R r? a�xwt,.,fe. *stn 3 r � tr" �s my, ® Ctrl © D io alp Eq M ED M 10 a to a El a a almolm Ban Balm Ulm �� lY � I f 19 WIN MW rml� Bmb,,aRmne «R 3 B POft.3M aw[,1Y.A4of01915 Legacy Park Apartments Building#I IM 0 Elp s919m,nu 1311f1 o ED ED 041 I 'll:l ® EEit '� 13 3 [a ® ® [3 _ —Preliminary ------ � � � � ---- C%Rn1OR ELEVI.TIONS A2.1 PMR, T sou' ,� o eiSR VR s` �W s msroemebefmpvlo saseurtm�su.+ summa is ammxwmne P9U1 3 ivcl Mmmgamn�t aRaa M Bcmt By.Ma 01 01915 Legacy Park Apartments Building#1 — I 1 8 BFfEBIOB EIEVGTIONS �,y�— A2.2 7v 3� w da a a gv Ley Yn +c.a 4 s, a r hx 5. 'R( ..¢ k ti s £ y al _ R �1np FT L. f d" Eii .,ic-'- f l� lam _ , � I�l' -�a �f - r:�'�. _ � I f l� 'i vn- �N-v - ^. ®• li Iti li it l', p wnan�s �� .. a _ 7 Ilii A� amm eumn9 lBm y %,�;3� PoBoa l98 ° °I_ L- Legacy_y Legacy Park Apartments F — � 1 Building#2 . L �I i( yam, -� 9el9m.MA �� u1 l a � un . {�{� � �_� — un AF. IAI3 u I. AM. P p Fly, JF 1 I . Y Fbv Al.l k avx. c^° 77777 ms's45 IV Tail 11 OW t* jy sF E . . . 1 fhUluLl i TM� MRM amjtti.Mmvymicm 3HOWeey Pofab BwMy.AL.019tl ' "i Legacy Perk Apartments Building N2 1:1131 Lili.l OB O'D E0 11:1.''.1 M M EaTI a B10 Prtlimimuy i- cuUATI a venws 11 All A2.1 Y tJ^iv m ;yyt g y i a ws dna gay y" x m © OTfe� � A � t t u u0 ' ��y �� g�`c u4,r� � _ � i.� s �.•t -tit+ �" � n+"�4` • vx v x zF � a*F r na' s h @Y� Jaa C L}$ ]R ZZ2 k 4� g a - "�. na FatlnmECmpnu 5]SBopbn SbM 6WiGJ em,euvne MBM MoIM MenayesW a�mEuay Po Boa]BB Barely,Ma.01915 Legacy Park Apartments 1 ® El D � � f 4 �- Building H2 sal��.Ma noPrtlimiary10 ® ® a 9 r_ exT[awa A2.2 av RMF r x r ��'•�" �.;� i YK t . ' a a' t .r .; Y r�" Pam vc�yar ''''*�� + j 4-5 K A I J p S9 r. ..G�:r-_ V ;A_ - 1.v '-.� i L/✓:1➢9.n �L / � IA,,,. J�"'_"'r_ I p �� #�k U� '�Yr._� n_." rr£a �. � I Hca. - � �II�•. r-,F,;, m�` 8 k� V ' L Buba,lWOfilB hulm Mw¢cmrnl 111 I B�y PO Box BBB 1 B My.MF.01915 Legacy Perk �_ — L\�_•- Apartments Building#3 r Y ll .aA rt?sl � ,1�� ) �Y1 -l'. A k•c.l t — -t'.e Nl All, Prtllminary_ s a . _,:• '� � V'" - J�_'^,. _� pries.rmv _�.... ' _s.- �� IA.._ JV .1 _ •_: .IArs�t � �• t�.v A _IA J:.+_ �L/ _.y U�.�..p =�T_ J 9•= e I I. � � � F8n W 5mitl YFv PIw A1.1 F ,� A e x K " '177-77 ��g'xE+ �.3` .. x�3 � '4t`S y s �� v+ t�a�x't u' `ayw✓ ro .� a fi ,x w+'k° m'xx �. �.s 't��:.` m o m m © m m EB M oil MILIJ f��ryf N d 8 8 ® I 0B ® 8 „ ® E] 8 s _ -- � � � on, MMM Bonn /'1 Bmm,euoxue M0.M 3 fl MereQa,xn[ J m PoSm 388 BevWy.Ma of 01915 Legacy Park Apartments Building#3 to Man t• �' a © E5 [o ® a El Ed M Palimi^orY_ Bene e00BEle0 . , eo � e � IM 0 "� 19 a a a M L M gee ® Boum MR LLLV JON$ A2.1 x.,+," ��, ' «,..'S'Aiz�' ''h" a ' 'a '^" r "'a ;* r;� , •Yy zt .,a �x �x �A Ice,; 1GF Ftlaab]Caryub 56ByYmn SOM Naf39l BwM,W @118 MRM Mj.Mempvnrnt 3BiOedwq Po BOF 38R B My.Mn 01915 Legacy Park i1 Apartments ,1 �N Building#3 swMW ISO A2.2 e • a ;v. �. a IIY�aN• , ^� iRx w. ell A 11Q-1 n^ _ 1 1� �'.. w.r m"ca �•`rssair.., .�C'��r37�� 1�+..• `:r\ r^ ,� .. ,.fl �,3 c�'-�a --��!ect ..°�,.•� ._tea '�r'r�,_!T? � �,, n w: mho•- �� _ a � : •i,GT`� Wi* .Jl�° � r.i x. nry ^ n'-+��r✓rnrl�«�n/r�hpry'"� n � tI - ry LEGACY PARK APARTMENTS SALEM Presented by: /// MRM Project Management, LLC & The Federated Companies 60-64 Grove Street/3 Harmony Grove May 2012 Salem,Massachusetts Scale 1"=40' .�Q,,�Y-a ;�.�� 2Q\ Z I� 4 k w I � f td" y a f" 00007j`1`\- 4 RIM � lilt L1 r■`S P ��r sr ws•`aa�.�.-i `r�],r�(T�Ti'. t'! -.e-' � • AT r,.wr- re: t?] ..(17 ('; d• .w. rr L`J'112�J— t. r I �rrr•'„vP;.r rrrr, rr."'v�arr.,.a�r '-�."r,.,, 4T,�. �. r.—e _ ( I I��::Ji�II _ n=-t•r -'�A`4,x_Y` a IY IL r r n N LEGACY PARK APARTMENTS SALEM .� �. Presented by s MRM Project Management, LLC Harmony Federated Companies 60-64 Grove May 2012 Salen),Ma55aChUSett5 Sc,ie1 =nn' 'ii#i Iij 11( IIl It7 Iia 111 11111 a !ii All 4fI r>, . RSR' % RR rRit a iy�x£; Rli �t, Ila,�iil Nily� Uk r! 1414 II �, III 111 r . I � - ill ill t�I i ,• f• �-,� r,31 tIIIIill III111®E1j' RR! itt C 111In w ni 1 n - . r 1 j,iii iii iii%ir` s `1R63Ixik 6 # 4 ytw ik Ill illlll 10 aIt ta' 11 } Ill v ' fl ( ll we �„ - � 9 ,^ �d ,,, ^� .�" •' � ;� , fir# ��; } ( l. r ��s'&Aa 44! 3 ♦ 4 ir :#fr 11 k j y.�}TY fi y 't t .. �.-... }� ir ev � fii t S t ♦d�-°', . .L'M'fit$ � �� '>4 �'C'� F 2 p,i i ( 3 yg Y v��. -g zr ff &r t1a4� '� rfa i }` E § �` R_^'�a-.i�lY1YaW a� ga;V �ffT♦ r Yr ?14 X a t ^ a f �g 4 ^ f _ y{ f � T IZA WIV All �. �' 9;rTT r s a ivM _ A}R t a � �.. �.�• y.. t=ax•�wsf•� - �yi.4,�Y' �y�C a4 .fie 1 r i� �:r--�``� � !, i �+�i,��}.. + s � � i—• i`,' K- cR� J 6 �y�'�J`�' �� R_Ss�-'- V. ` kl i 1 ,i in }� i 3' ' - b'b. •yk ' `T"-'c ..1� v�� - L. +� 4 . •}L �%y, l y�-% � �x~ � � I,� ._. t_ C a i �'" }'' � Yr - 'A'°E,.'� � sl"!(y.�' A A• A. k = I,i 3 r r ; . b` t i}.s f} �Mjyj', - K4Yl�.r' i Y` +�y [�s'rri `a r ? � �5..y� -t —� - 1, #i,r •.. �.s-- � I, % ,g i' *7C � ��}� � �t'�� r.7.,i✓�bx��'-. .�. �h k 1+ � i� �°!'s 2'�� a� _- i _I,•.. •.F x� �'w+ � V s 'r ;P•� � a ��,y4fi� "ty�}� .+ x\-� 'L as! t.• .�. ! �.:. - rRa 'F:tn 4 d � J aj "JJ''.'f_ � a�'S't:'a�.J T. V"J[ r - -w n � �E 4. P `a� Y HG/ ♦v- I $r y�y{i �'�. ti.. a _ • ' .a.11' {�R {4 -. iV- ` 3 t•*iy..lswA __ - _. _— - _ _ +'.�iP f�AC^� .��._S,6[S.Y I•�.��'d .-.w�+l' (moi i` �.. R_�""7E . `r w.i3.e• lx. ,� eaR .d /.. .. ...w. a.� Ra:.. = �`- - WgM•ayq.F i��JI r ,r r. . a a 4[ f F �".V *k. 4 1.°..+ �S` • 6i.ir ` ` s ' ^S�#� y;� .s ? ti b_ R r � �-� <�� •a*� F 1A '. •.a F�. _ r�}. - baa��?`�y€T�`+ k -�� "�•e;. q.ry Y M y �.x..r� .tris � ,qr, a..s '.� t -- `x` ,.,. ^,Y• ' �fi„ti. i � S•' 7'�i� ;.�� b "� �,. �. y.o J.'4 . = 4�:` _4[.-s_a .._. ... , . .. ..�T i .,. `- -• ».� � f rr � #. ,. 4�.ak 44. � - ...... •- � ►. _ „t4 +4 b ty +rn. � V �iA p' - `�� it _. r� �i/�� ,`} �� kll�f • f� s'-'4{ k alAf . � � iYj `,�,{ia. � II *e.*s�=� _,�{ +1311.d4� ^. � 4 ..� *v�. •.Iia �",� t � ,:/i'!, ... .'./, .•_ 7r ' °wait_�, '+'�K � ,� r.-.,-.s,�f-. •�<*»s _�_ r - r�" ,�".�� I�f. FIs.. .;w�,.. w + � ++ ...e .w'. - --• ' - - -- .w ��^.�•�i�gr'�i: f-i " Ira- d'=. Oy !' �. ',4 y � .yH. i / ✓�4 mb�� Y4 ja �'' Z2 rS• e— � h+ ;,i � � .lr y� �i'2"1Ri *�� } J {�� (4 q' Y "4�'. •_ f Q. fi 1i ; :..L_lCi � � A +i '+a—TY'P—•6_ A err Lr "'�yi'tt w♦ C -3'F�'t��a�,� .,� �.1 ',t X12 vie�'XXI�� iii A i �i F { i. � J #� � � � � � i, x ' .. All Al t 4 b. +v• �01.`�„ q. 3�.4. �J+�+ w.-•, . ' 1 t,�'+'161:.a � y w- f ��•_+_ { ��r, �_ t5 J .w .a--,�� `'.1. +�antiti AS�"_ �' _ 4n 1- • •+IJ Y � � •.;• '�. { A' li '� .: "' sl s, tom. -� E - 'y� `"� �r'! . E; rj 7 +� 4 �A +,�t� f.`"...1i,��L•` r � *� �.,,�` '�}' js i 'L'A: : ` � �. � � � �, f C �! t;{ : I. , l; P i•+��p'Y - iX. %, �"e�,_�t fir" }e�rj�l� 1 _ y`i_*YrF" '• ..s. v *t� r ri�� ,t •,t 4 . - 1F � _ _ '''��p T � �•' � �'6_� +y�1' '' ` � 9.� IPA ,f-Y-i'-r.s --�; :�'J'• : t } .,� li �-S. + �: r•. ¢�yV �' � • '>�1 �"'�`QC a, r 1• �';,, Zy ��' Xi' ay �'� ]+i �`- [ w�r2 ` ` •'� ''� � \i.�w;�r � R r.+r � �qy r i "t 7sh} a; _ ': l _ ^ q,. Y � ,1 �^�. : j' b,�y P�3+i nqi{, .'fic�•. ..e.'L. ... ry: .l�r"� :^!, Y •R". .'h, . :i -+e r .�,. f '��i r 1, �g, :�t+ty�Yµ#�" '8` .i , �+-q. .,_o '��• - r+ ��, a_.- ., ti.-+" In � ' f`#fig. :y- � '•y,{ •,Y � - '# ro b�'�"` xY �A�,��l,�t+� �°°t+(1' � .�2` _- .J: T •. �fy� rte', +"�� Y±� t f - Y�,t r•r• or" t `+� may, �r��.r i{r,"�` 'i�V_''�"' - . `e .+*� �,� . „ ♦ �x'R 4 .+T{•tom ti"R . .Y# ' J'r .� � �s�. aW� i' I' 11/• EV m•MS�}`° « +moi loot 'wo '�•r .. lf,l}).f 1�'r �I # / �r ' wOTi 'rf «ii ` */` .1 + `• 1; 1 . s i �\ - I ` � T� �'� • a IJ r`. T'l liil 11� 1 1 -ga Al ifA l 1E1, ��1 �� iii it t� • �; -�:. lU I11 pl Ilt qi h i III III I' I �♦j�' +s..��` f•♦ +, III III It Y ffi E.ii1 � - '�rx141�1 ` ill� � ItiFr litE� � � 'v� iir 'N 1.. 114, uiiii II I �{" � , r �� ♦-� s,.2� dl_�`,rr� {"=� f �'�� 1 t::. !r♦ � �• �`r,y:{ ,1 t, ! PCf6 f Pill �f �' ❑i I [r, fill P ) tti'!�+ ifl 1#t !1 III 111 111 nl r� n 1t1 .) ' lli - f[i lftld°lttt' Pit❑ unY I n ii - . y�A�ff #fitklit t�� mul N{a i r� r�� ,. 1 5t'4 t � `, tlh st t• II .1111111 +�nl Pl� � ♦_-. 'f } t'�1, l E l y _ 4 i r— �..t(f! ' - � �� •' y rte,,. � � ag 1I1♦ " v� "ha E� "�✓= .q � ..� i � ff D'♦ �"'* ,r �w,.�p^,�,� -N, '+� s�n`�� yy� 5 J � 3 Y•, r4 � ..'Nr� -T �r.Y 3 . � � v 29 . • L�.1, y{ d l!i-I i11 111 111 �� .Nie' 14. 11i iH hl iii 6t Tit a�1 pi ❑ t n ❑i i-i C hj5...' '��12F•B�:Y K rI- 4 iil£t Ili `"3't .1 t - no { c} 119 I' a t!I " i r� . L;1C {llzi ¢¢ Ili F Ili lie ��t 73 lti tit i i # Iia S ? L lit lit f! 3 iii €it i� 11!� 71 �,; "' + €• Cyr � �' .r��,�= t{{i�t�- N Ill lu ul Ili �i i }11 r ��k■ --.� a�.� 1b � ' < i t r... � T - ita ,"j1 12i}. �, 3M{M �:}�i �iY�" P,J 1 - `i_ R — •+r i!•t+..• � . -s` �+:. 1. �T ,.€fit�r� s%i,., n��f ^Sia ..�� '� _..,fl �� `�� " �, �:� • � �, �'-'^Y' �. lilIf3 rIII ' li"iHiilf Itlgl u n �i t c : t 1. itt lit r �ru -+ g `afflite.z (Safl IltXf ti littti 1111; ' ii R: - _ �. . lQfg � t tfr-4lflill Sl �x t ist,tlaliifri tli r a7 � ' .., s i?.: 3 T aril �i 4 ii. _ Elk iS�€ " ilia ��i y pct y Jill It Y ; a po ie '7. +• .. � r • i .K�,°°. n }�_ �t rt Pa "r"vy�a. tee- " ',�&�'`- fig: ' ry-} � -i•�}yam- ,i }t �� ..`.v ,ar ra. W ayf3'fi ' �'�i ' ! IiRI Ili ila � "., RiRI 11 A' 111 III 911 ill -•s � � i - ' Y ala III III lal Iq II I ' ails all ill III II II i �' � �I +..�- '� = � ` !fes • �'� � �"� a � ' � - xt� I >r o r `l 111 111 [[ lal ara tri aal t tat a 3'�� a s '� : .' kEli�+ '}If, aid tfa f fl if. alt III 33 y I r� 11E c ail� ' 111 Iq lal IU I ! S .:. of s "} - ..' 3 �."" ..F..9 F{r "'',�� , � t!a � 1°�ir� � dr• F'"i x � :. �.,�. � j. -i a -f c H 11 a 111111 HI � 1 ■RIl1 * 2'•-• ! {` Ty� it! ! a III n a h t ..I° - ;. _ - .—,x cl 3 �Cid3 r iil i; Itl �' la} a w 4 1 Nr ili na l a l a d f �a 1 A F r 6i3S �± , . 'IIa � itat tlla 1111❑ nlra I u . � .1130 ' 1, rile }Sl t lie li al7 # tc t _ j s ai < ,1+ ,��3., f _< i _ t, t'�. _ ' ♦ � �� I�.t II! Ia B- ♦ 6 �j [ _-�+*,t��+ .l 1.' r i ��; 'aie'`_*.^�iVr -. !i za . . . ..• r. S'' I lutea II' II PI lil L� Tx !' � s^=4rt. meq, s"�s•- "FT s"r - ; tll� Ylaj ; 11 1 �7 Ul 01 "'i:• .L: • — �� --- r�"c t„.. q 111 (1! all��;�.^n�r 1 iS a a lea � *.� a�+�,` -. � ��f� C''^ . .. " Y � ��• "A \ e". .r � s""x '`"� h"a �`�m.�' 'tea✓ 4.. � y � ,;1l a _�` � .{yv�. -y..w,. *�.r.gy�'xS�'"`�w�`'K't•y � I . Y•`�,I � � a 4 � S f 'yRf.` yr, Rv t"'..G �� .H'•R `�ri � ��'�yy+C. I. _ -. 1 r.-f1•>S8 `�`nSe. 7 ��..� .�{4.W+.. ,'`` 'yixN � •J`. �! 'oe "':Ts=.aT`..T.'�"i_ J • iJY ++�",�` QT c, .t-'� 't^�'`'"'}T City of Salem, MA 10/1/2012 Interactive Map OF t- ®r � fa 0° �'c� •Roao 4 �• PEADODY ® gR�NYGRo�F RD }h ,Pl� gyp` FRET UA$OLV ST e S y� 2 ts'tRE �. gRDt �i ® B osrory sr BU Property Information Property ID Location MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT Because of different update schedules,current property assessments may not reflect recent changes to property boundaries.Check with the Board of Assessors to confirm toundaries used at time of assessment f � } June 20, 2012 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre, Director City of Salem Inspectional Services Dept. City Hall Annex, 3`d Floor 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 By Hand Delivery Subject: Building Height Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove 60 & 64 Grove St. & 3 Harmony Grove Rd. Dear Mr. St. Pierre: This letter documents our calculation of building height as specified in the City of Salem zoning regulations for the three proposed buildings at the subject project. The project architect, Beauds Art, Inc., has revised the proposed building footprints and architectural elevation drawings in response to comments received at several Salem Planning Board meetings. Beauds Art consulted with City representatives regarding specific architectural features, color schemes, and general building appearance during this process. The revisions include adopting a flat roof style instead of the gable roof that was previously proposed. Copies of their plans were included in the June 20, 2012, drawing set previously provided to the City (ref: list of applicable drawings provided below). The architectural elevation drawings show that at each of the three buildings, the roof will be constructed 42'-6" above the first floor elevation. The project grading plan shows that the building with the lowest Average Grade, and therefore the building with the largest Building Height, will be Building no. 3 (ref: Sheet C-4A and C-4B, Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plans; prepared by Griffin Engineering, last revised June 20, 2012). At Building no. 3, the Average Grade will be elevation 19.35 feet and the first floor elevation will be 21.0 feet. In other words, the Average Grade of Building no. 3 will be approximately V-8" below the Building no. 3 first floor elevation. The Building Height of Building no. 3, therefore, is 42'-6" plus V-8", which equals 44'-2". This is 5'-10" less than the Building Height allowed in the underlying zoning district (50' allowed in the Business Park Development district). As shown on the architectural drawings, portions of the flat roof perimeter will be built with a two to five-foot tall parapet. The parapet is intended to screen roof-top mounted HVAC equipment and improve building aesthetics. t Y Mr. Thomas St. Pierre, Director Page 2 Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove June 20, 2012 Should you have any questions or comments, or wish to meet to review this information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, Griffin Engineering Group, LLC Robert H. Griffin, P.E. Reference Drawings Building #1 — Exterior Elevations A2.1; by: Beauds Art, Inc.; 6/18/12 Building #1 — Exterior Elevations A2.2; by: Beauds Art, Inc.; 6/18/12 Building #2 — Exterior Elevations A2.1; by: Beauds Art, Inc.; 6/18/12 Building #2 — Exterior Elevations A2.2; tom: Beauds Art, Inc.; 6/18/12 Building #3 — Exterior Elevations A2.1; by: Beauds Art, Inc.; 6/18/12 Building #3 — Exterior Elevations A2.2; by: Beauds Art, Inc.; 6/18/12 Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, Sheets C-4A and C-413; by: Griffin Engineering; 6/20/12. Cc: City of Salem Planning Board (w/ enc.) J. Correnti, Serafini, Serafini, Darling & Correnti (w/ enc.) M. Hubbard, MRM Project Management (w/ enc.) Brian Beaudette, Beauds Art, Inc. (w/ enc.) CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 6un.DING DEP:ut'I,vleMr I20WAStiINGCONSTREET,.3"' FLOOR TEL. (973) 745-9595 F.�x(973) 740-9346 KIMI3ERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR TFUNI.AS STTIEIUtE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COAIMISSIONER :April 12, 2012 Danielle McKnight Planning Department City of Salem Dear Danielle, You have asked ,on behalf of the Planning Board, for some detail regarding the definition of "story" as defined in the Mass. State Building Code . I understand this concerns the project at the old Salem Oil and Grease site. The Salem Zoning Ordinance defers to the Mass State Buildimg Code for a definition of"Story". As described in the Eighth edition of the Mass State building Code(which consists if the I.B.C. code with Mass aunenchnents) .,The definition ON story is " That portion of a building included between the Lipper surface of a floor and the upper surface of the floor or roof next above (also see Basement and Mezzanine in section 502.l) It is measured as the vertical distance from the top of two successive tiers of beams or finished floor surfaces and,'for die topmost story, from the top of the floor finish to the top of the ceiling joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters. At first look this would be a simple way to address the number of stories. However, if this simple definition was used, the basement of residential homes would count as a story and only ranches would be able to be constructed under our zoning ordinance. We have had to address this issue on previous projects in the City, most recently the residential buildings behind Hillcrest Chevrolet. 'fhe definitions ofstory bel'011le critical due to the fact that building materials and construction methods have to change.. Therefore' Story above grade plane " becomes the important calculation. It is this definition, that I have used to determine the IlUmber of stories in buildings . fhc definition of story above grade plane is " Any story having its finished floor surface entirely above grade plain, or in which the finished stntace ofthefloor next above is: I. :Afore than 6 Ice( above ;rade plane; or 2. .tAlore than 13 leet above the finished ground Ievcl at any point. " t he definition of"Grade Plane is bond in section 502. 1 ofthe Staic Building Codc and is as lullows ":A rclViencc plant; represcntiit� thc :n�cragc of 11I115hetl gr0und level ❑djuining the building at the r . CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPAR-MIENP _....: 120 WAS11INGTONSTItEET 3"' FLOOR TE L. (973) 715-9595 K IMBE RLE Y DRISCOLL FAX(978) 710-9846 MAYOR TFIOMAS ST.PIE RRE DIREc7rm OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER exterior walls. Where the finished ground level slopes away from the exterior walls, the reference plane shall be established by the lowest points within the area between the building and the lot line or, where the lot line is more than six feet from the building ,between the building and a point six feet from the building." Looking at the site plan ,sheet number C-a ,provided by Griffin Engineering, the most severe case is building number U. The Garage elevation is at I I feet and the finished floor above(first floor ) is at 21 feet. This gives you an average grade plain of 16 feet. The floor above is 21 feet for a difference of 5 feet. Also the finished floor(garage I l feet) to finish floor(first 21 feet) is a 10 foot difference. At no point is the finished first floor more than 12 feet above the finished ground level nor is it more than six feet above the "Grade Plane" In my opinion, the garage is not a story above grade plane. If further information is required ,please let me know. Sinceerel , Thomas StPierre Building Commissioner/Zoning Officer CHAPTER 5 GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS MEZZANINE. An intermediate level or levels between the SECTION 501 floor and ceiling of any story and in accordance with Section GENERAL 505. .t 501.1 Scope.The provisions of this chapter control the height and area of structures hereafter erected and additions to exist- ing structures. GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND [F]501.2 Address identification.New and existing buildings AREA LIMITATIONS shall be provided with approved address numbers or letters. 503.1 General.The building height and area shall not exceed Each character shall be a minimum 4 inches(102 mm)high and the limits specified in Table 503 based on the type of construc- a minimum of 0.5 inch(12.7 mm)wide.They shall be installed tion as determined by Section 602 and the occupancies as on a contrasting background and be plainly visible from the determined by Section 302 except as modified hereafter.Each street or road fronting the property. Where access is by means portion of a building separated by one or more fire walls com- of a private road and the building address cannot be viewed plying with Section 706 shall be considered to be a separate from the public way,a monument,pole or other approved sign building. or means shall be used to identify the structure. 503.1.1 Special industrial occupancies. Buildings and structures designed to house special industrial processes SECTION 502 that require large areas and unusual building heights to accommodate craneways or special machinery and equip- DEFINITIONS ment, including, among others, rolling mills; structural 502.1 Definitions.The following words and terms shall,for the metal fabrication shops and foundries; or the production { purposes of this chapter and as used elsewhere in this code, and distribution of electric, gas or steam power, shall be have the meanings shown herein. exempt from the building height and area limitations of Table 503. AREA, BUILDING. The area included within surrounding exterior walls (or exterior walls and fire walls) exclusive of 503.1.2 Buildings on same lot.Two or more buildings on vent shafts and courts.Areas of the building not provided with the same lot shall be regulated as separate buildings or shall surrounding walls shall be included in the building area if such be considered as portions of one building if the building areas are included within the horizontal projection of the roof height of each building and the aggregate building area of or floor above. the buildings are within the limitations of Table 503 as mod- ified by Sections 504 and 506. The provisions of this code BASEMENT.A story that is not a story above gradeplane(see applicable to the aggregate building shall be applicable to "Story above grade plane"in Section 202). each building. The definition of`Basement' does not apply to the provi- 503.1.3 Type I construction.Buildings of Type I construc- sions of Section 1612 for flood loads(see"Basement'in Sec- tion permitted to be of unlimited tabular building heights tion 1612.2). and areas are not subject to the special requirements that EQUIPMENT PLATFORM. An unoccupied, elevated plat- allow unlimited area buildings in Section 507 or unlimited building height in Sections 503.L l and 504.3 or increased form used exclusively for mechanical systems or industrial building heights and areas for other types of construction. process equipment, including the associated elevated walk- ways,stairs,alternating tread devices and ladders necessary to access the platform(see Section 505.5). SECTION 504 GRADE PLANE.A reference plane representing the average BUILDING HEIGHT of finished ground level adjoining the building at exterior 504.1 General. The building height permitted by Table 503 walls. Where the finished ground level slopes away from the shall be increased in accordance with this section. exterior walls, the reference plane shall be established by the Exception: The building height of one-story aircraft han- lowes[points within the area between the building and the lot gars,aircraft paint hangars and buildings used for the manu- line or, where the lot lute is more than 6 feet(1829 mm) from factoring of aircraft shall not be limited if the building is the building,between the building and a point 6feet(1829mm) from the building, provided with an automatic fire-extinguishing system in accordance with Chapter 9 and is entirely surrounded by HEIGHT, BUILDING. The vertical distance from grade public ways or vcrds not less in width than one and one-half plane to the average height of the highest roof surface. times the building height. 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE® 79 DEFINITIONS SMOKE-PROTECTED ASSEMBLY SEATING. See Sec- [F]STORAGE,HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.See Section tion 1002.1. 415.2. SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE.See Section 902.L STORM SHELTER.See Section 423.2. [F]SOLID. See Section 415.2. Community storm shelter. See Section 423.2. SPECIAL AMUSEMENT BUILDING.See Section 411.2. Residential storm shelter. See Section 423.2. SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA. See Section 1612.2. STORY.That portion of abuilding included between the upper SPECIAL INSPECTION.See Section 1702.I. surface of a floor and the upper surface of the floor or roof next above(also see"Basement,""Mezzanine"and Section 502.1). SPECIAL INSPECTION, CONTINUOUS. See Section It is measured as the vertical distance from top to top of two 1702.1. successive tiers of beams or finished floor surfaces and,for the SPECIAL INSPECTION,PERIODIC.See Section 1702.1. topmost story,from the top of the floor finish to the top of the SPECIAL STRUCTURAL WALL. See Section 1908.1.L ceiling joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters. SPECIFIED. See Section 2102.1. STORY ABOVE GRADE PLANE.Any story having its fin- SPECIFIED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ishedfloor surface entirely above grade plane,orinwhich the I MASONRY(f'J. See Section 2102.1. finished surface of the floor next above is: SPLICE.See Section 702.1. 1. More than 6 feet(1829 mm)above grade plane;or SPRAYED FIRE-RESISTANT MATERIALS.See Section 2. More than 12 feet(3658 mm)above the finished ground 1702.1. level atany point. STACK BOND.See Section 2102.1. STRENGTH.See Section 2102.1. STAGE.See Section 410.2. Design strength.See Section 2102.1. STAIR. See Section 1002.1. Nominal strength. See Sections 1602.1 and 2102.1. STAIRWAY.See Section 1002.1. Required strength. See Sections 1602.1 and 2102.1. STAIRWAY,EXTERIOR.See Section 1002.1. STRENGTH DESIGN.See Section 1602.1. STAIRWAY,INTERIOR. See Section 1002.1. STRUCTURAL COMPOSITE LUMBER. See Section STAIRWAY,SPIRAL.See Section 1002.1. 2302.1. IF] STANDPIPE SYSTEM, CLASSES OF. See Section Laminated veneer lumber(LVL).See Section 2302.1. 902.1. Parallel strand lumber(PSL).See Section 2302.1. Class I system.See Section 902.1. STRUCTURAL GLUED-LAMINATED TIMBER. See Class II system. See Section 902.1. Section 2302.1. Class III system.See Section 902.1. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION. See Section 1702.1. IF]STANDPIPE,TYPES OF.See Section 902.1. STRUCTURE.That which is built or constructed. Automatic dry.See Section 902.L SUBDIAPHRAGM.See Section 2302.1. Automatic wet. See Section 902.1. SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE.See Section 1612.2. Manual dry. See Section 902.1. SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT.See Section 1612.2. Manual wet.See Section 902.1. SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE. See Section 3402.1. Semiautomatic dry.See Section 902.1. SUITE.See Section 1002.1. START OF CONSTRUCTION.See Section 1612.2. SUNROOM.See Section l202.1. STEEL CONSTRUCTION,COLD-FORMED.See Section 2202.1. IF]SUPERVISING STATION.See Section 902,1. STEEL JOIST.See Section 2202.1. IF]SUPERVISORY SERVICE. See Section 902.1. STEEL MEMBER,STRUCTURAL. See Section 2202.1. IF]SUPERVISORY SIGNAL.See Section 902.1. STEEP SLOPE.A roof slope greater than two units vertical in [F]SUPERVISORY SIGNAL-INITIATING DEVICE.See 12 units horizontal (17-percent slope). Section 902.1. STONE MASONRY.See Section 2102.1. SWIMMING POOLS. See Section 31.09.2. � Ashlar stone masonry.See Section 2102.1. T RATING.See Section 702.1. Rubble stone masonry.See Section 2102.1. TECHNICALLY INFEASIBLE.See Section 3402.1. 20 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE® CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT ` S f 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3" FLOOR ° TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAX(978)740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR TYiOMAS STTIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER September 5, 2012 Salem Planning Board City of Salem 120 Washington Street-3`d floor Salem Ma. 01970 R.E Legacy Park-updated height calculations Dear Chairperson and Board Members. I have been asked to review the latest elevations for this project dated 7/2/2012 .The issue with lower level remains unchanged as does my explanation. The new elevations show a flat roof with a parapet wall along part of the roof. This parapet is below the maximum height allowed and does not constitute another story. Salem Zoning Ordinance uses the definition of a story as defined by the State Building Code The Massachusetts State Building Code (eighth edition) section 1509. Addresses rooftop structures. Specifically section 1509.2.3 Use Limitations. " A penthouse,bulkhead or any other similar projection above the roof shall not be used for purposes other than shelter of mechanical equipment or shelter of vertical shaft openings in the roof. Provisions such as louvers, louver blades, or flashing shall be made to protect the mechanical equipment and the building interior from the elements.Penthouse or bulkheads used for the purpose other than permitted by this section shall conform to the requirements of this code for an additional story. The restrictions of this section shall not prohibit the placing of wood flagpoles or other similar structures on the roof of any building." Hopefully this addresses the questions regarding height . Singel Thomas St.Pierre Building Commissioner/Zoning Officer Page 1 of 1 Danielle McKnight From: Thomas St. Pierre Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:47 PM To: Danielle McKnight Subject: Legacy Park Danielle, I have reviewed the updated drawings for this project. I have compared the information on the drawings against Salem's Zoning Ordinance as well as the eighth edition of the Mass State Building Code. It is my opinion that the building dimensions comply with our Zoning Ordinance Thomas StYierre Building Commissioner/Zoning Olfficer 7/5/2012 ROOF ASSEMBLIES AND ROOFTOP STRUCTURES SECTION 1509 shall be of noncombustible or fire retardant- ROOFTOP STRUCTURES treated wood construction. 1509.1 General.The provisions of this section shall govern the 3. On buildings of Type III, IV and V construction, construction of rooftop structures. the exterior walls of penthouses with afire separa- 1509.2 Penthouses.A penthouse or penthouses in compliance tion distance of more than 5 feet (1524 mm) and less than 20 feet(6096 mm)shall be at least l-hour with Sections 1509.2.1 through 1509.2.4 shall be considered as fire-resistance-rated construction. Walls with a a portion of the story below. fire separation distance of 20 feet (6096 mm) or 1509.2.1 Height above roof.A penthouse or other projec- greater from a common property line shall be of tion above the roof in structures of other than Type I con- Type IV construction or noncombustible, or struction shall not exceed 28 feet(8534 mm)above the roof fire-retardant-treated wood construction. Roofs where used as an enclosure for tanks or for elevators that run shall be constructed of materials and fire-resis- to the roof and in all other cases shall not extend more than lance rated as required in Table 601 and Section 18 feet(5486 mm)above the roof. 603,item 25.3. Interior framing and walls shall be Tvox IV construction or noncombustible or 1509.2.2 Area limitation. The aggregate area of pent- fire-retardant-treated woad constriction. houses and other rooftop structures shall not exceed one-third the area of the supporting roof. Such penthouses 4. On buildings of Type I construction, unprotected shall not contribute to either the building area or number of noncombustible enclosures housing only mechan- stories as regulated by Section 503.1. The area of the ical equipment and located with a minimum fire penthouse shall not be included in determining the fire area separation distance of 20 feet(6096 mm)shall be defined in Section 902. permitted. 1509.2.3 Use limitations. A penthouse, bulkhead or any 5. On buildings of Type I construction two stories or + less above grade plane in height,or Type 11,III,IV other similar projection above the roof shall not be usedfor purposes other than shelter of mechanical equipment or and V construction, unprotected noncombustible shelter of vertical shaft openings in the roof.Provisions such orfire-retardant-treatedwoodenclosures housing as louvers,louver blades or Flashing shall be made to protect only mechanical equipment and located with a the mechanical equipment and the building interior from the mmimumfireseparation distance of20feet(6096 elements.Penthouses or bulkheads used for purposes othermm)shall be permitted. 10 ,than permitted by this section shall conform to the require;[ 6. On one-story buildings, combustible unroofed mentsofthis code for anadditional story.The restrictioiisof mechanical equipment screens, fences or similar this section shall not prohibit the placing of wood Flagpoles enclosures are permitted where located with afire of similar structures on the roof of any building, separation distance of at least 20 feet(6096 nim) 1509.2.4 Type of construction. Penthouses shall be con- from adjacent property lines and where not strutted with walls,floors and roof as required for the build- exceeding 4 feet (1219 mm) in height above the roof surface. ing. 7. Dormers shall be of the same type of construction Exceptions: as the roof on which they are placed,or of the exte- I._On buildings of Type I construction, the exterior rior walls of the building. walls and roofs of penthouses with afire separa- 1509.3 Tanks.Tanks having a capacity of more than 500 gal- tion distance of more than 5 feet (1524 mm) and tons (2 ml) placed in or on a building shall be supported on less than 20 feet (6096 mm) shall be of at least masonry, reinforced concrete, steel or Type IV construction [-hour fire resistance-rated noncombustible con- provided that,where such supports are located in the building struction. Walls and roofs with afire separation above the lowest story,the support shall be fire-resistance rated distance of20feet(6096mm)orgreater shall beof as required for Type TA construction. noncombustible construction. Interior framing and walls shall be of noncombustible construction. 1509.3.1 Valve. Such tanks shall have in the bottom or on the side near the bottom,a pipe or outlet, fitted with a suit- 2. On buildings of Type I construction two stories able quick opening valve for discharging the contents in an - above grade plane or less in height and Type 11 emergency through an adequate drain. construction,the exterior walls and roofs of pent- houses with afireseparation distance of more than 1509.3.2 Location. Such tanks shall not be placed over or 5 feet(1524 mm)and less than 20 feet(6096 mm) neara line of stairs or an elevator shaft,unless there is a solid shall be of at least I-hour tire-resistance-rated roof or floor underneath the tank. noncombustible or fire-retardant-treated wood 1509.3.3'rank cover.Unenclosed roof tanks shall have cov- construction. Walls and roofs with afire separa- _ ers sloping toward the outer edges. (.. 1 tion distance of 20 feet(6096 mm)or greater shall be of noncombustible or fire-retardant-treated 1509.4 Cooling towers. Cooling towers in excess of 250 wood construction. Interior framing and walls square feet(23.2 m'-)in base area or in excess of 15 feet(4572 300 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE® S 1;CN ONDiT44.0 CITY OF SALEM 33Sil �y—`dP LEGAL DEPARTMENT 9" i ea�''aC4 - CNINEDO 93 WASI'IINGfON S'IREE'I ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSF..1l'S 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-744-1279 KIMI9E1uLEY DRISCOLL HLIZABEI"H RF,.NNAm,ESQ. ROBINS"FEIN,ESQ. MAYOR CITY SOLICITOR AS51'.CITY SOLICITOR To: Salem Planning Board From: Robin Steinl ) Re: Planned Unit Developments in the Business Park Development Zone Date: July 5, 2012 You have asked for guidance in analyzing an application for a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") in the Business Park Development Zone ("BPD"). The Planning Board must review all projects in a uniform and consistent manner as set forth in the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance ("Ordinance"). The Planning Board may, but is not required to, approve a PUD when the requirements of§7.3 of the Ordinance are met. Pursuant to §7.3.8 of the Ordinance, the Planning Board may grant a special permit where the following findings are made: 1. The proposed planned unit development is in harmony with the purposes and intent of this Ordinance and the master plan of the City of Salem and that it will promote the purpose of this section. 2. The mixture of uses in the planned unit development is determined to be sufficiently advantageous to tender it appropriate to depart from the normal requirements of the district. 3. The planned unit development would not result in a net negative environmental impact. The purpose a PUD is set forth as follows: Planned unit development is designed to provide various types of land use which can be combined in compatible relationship with 1 each other as part of a totally planned development. It is the intent of this Section to ensure compliance with the master plan and good zoning practices, while allowing certain desirable departures from the strict provisions of specific zone classifications. The advantages which are intended to result from the application for planned unit development are to be ensured by the adoption of a precise development plan with a specific time limit for commencement of construction. §7.3.1 Identified within the Master Plan are many goals for the City including the"development of the commercial and industrial properties which have become contaminated from prior activities." While the Master Plan identifies attracting new business and redeveloping vacant sites as a priority, I do not interpret the Ordinance such that the goals of the Master Plan are to be an absolute bar to projects that depart from those goals so long as the Planning Board, in applying §7.3.8.2 determines that such departure is appropriate. It is illogical to conclude that the Master Plan prevents a PUD in the BPD from having a residential component when the Ordinance explicitly allows such residential use. In reviewing such a project the Planning Board may consider factors including, but not limited to, the history of the property, the likelihood that the property might ever be redeveloped with a commercial use or if including a residential component appears necessary to achieve the overall goal of improving and developing contaminated properties. "In the BPD district residential uses and associated improvements, such as parking and landscaping, cannot exceed 50% of the land area of the parcel(s); or in the case of mixed use buildings, residential uses cannot exceed 50% of the gross square footage of the proposed development." Ordinance-§7.3.3.3. As part of a review pursuant to §7.3.3.3 of a project that does not involve mixed-use buildings, the Planning Board must consider each and every part of a site and determine if the land is in residential use or used as an improvement associated therewith. All land that is exclusively used or improved for residential purposes is in residential use. The Planning Board should consider what land is being used to support the residential use or is required to be left unimproved because of the residential use. For example, if land is required between residential buildings or used to access residential buildings it is appropriate to treat the land as in residential use. The Planning Board should also review the land denominated as usable open space pursuant to §7.3.5 and determine if it is appropriate for that land to be so categorized. It is consistent with the Ordinance not to treat such usable open space as being in residential use because the land will be available for use by the public. For further guidance on §7.3.3.3 and other matters addressed herein, please see the memorandum of Attorney Mark Bobrowski attached hereto. Attorney Bobrowski is a well respected land use attorney and while he did not draft §7.3.3.3, he was involved in drafting the Ordinance and is familiar therewith. 2 BLATMAN, BOBROWSIU &.MEAD, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 9 Damonmill Square,Suite 4A4 Concord,MA 01742 Phone: 978-371-3930 MARK BOBROWSKI Fax:978-371-3828 NEWBURYPORT OFFICE maric@bbmatlaw.com 30 Green Street Newburyport,MA 01950 Phone: 978-463-7700 Fax:978-463-7747 July 3, 2012 FR: Mark Bobrowski TO: Beth Renard, City Solicitor RE: Proposed PUD You have asked me whether the PUD proposed by MRM Project Management, LLC ("MRM") on Grove Street;partially within the BPD District, complies with the residential area limit set forth in Section 7.3.3.3 of the Zoning Ordinance ("ZO"). You have also asked me whether other sections of the ZO come into play. You have provided me with the following documents: * Site layout plan for the MRM PUD; * Memorandrun of Lyme Duncan to the City Council dated August 29, 2008; Correspondence of Councillor Prevey to the Planning Board, dated May 17, 2012; * Memorandum of Danielle McKnight to Planning Board ("McKnight Memorandum"), dated April 24, 2012. 1 have reviewed these documents, as well as the pertinent sections of the ZO. I offer the following opinion. First,to put the controversy regarding the eligibility of this PUD in perspective, I remind the Planning Board and other interested parties that there is a marked distinction between "eligibility" for a PUD special permit and the "grant' of such special permit. In short, only those projects that meet each and every requirement of Section 7.3 are eligible for consideration. However, the Plamting Board has discretionary authority to deny even those projects that are eligible: Neither the Zoning Enabling Act nor the town zoning by-law gives . . . an absolute right to the special permit. . . . The board is not compelled to grant the permit. It has discretionary power in acting thereon. The board must act fairly and reasonably on the evidence presented to it,keeping in mind the objects and purposes of the enabling act and -1- the by-law. MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of Duxbury, 356 Mass. 635, 638-639 (1970). Thus, a"board may deny a special permit even if the permit might have been lawfully issued.' Humble Oil v. Board of Appeals ofArnherst, 360 Mass. 604, 605 (1971) ("The mere fact that the standards set forth are complied with does not compel the granting of a special permit. . . ."). As to the MRM proposal, you have infonned me that some City Councillors and abutters have questioned the computation of the area devoted to "residential uses and associated improvements, such as parking and landscaping" which is capped in Section 7.3.3.3 of the ZO at fifty (50%) percent. The "nonresidential" areas, which the McKnight Memorandum identifies as 51% of the total land area of the parcels, are shown on the site plan as hash-marked areas. I see nothing in the conclusion set forth in the McNight Memoranduun that is fundamentally inconsistent with the language of Section 7.3 in general, and Section 7.3.3.3 in particular. Section 7.3.5 clearly establishes that"usable open space" is a separate category of laid use within a PUD. This has been appropriately counted as a"nonresidential"portion of the land area. There is no front,rear, or side yard requirement set forth in Section 7.3.4.1. The hash- marked area shown on the site plan does include the residential building footprints, the spaces between the three buildings,the parking meas devoted to these buildings, and portions of the access road located in the BPD District to reach the parking areas. I assume that all landscaping is within the parking areas or the spaces between the three residential buildings. I-also assume that the access road heading across the tracks to the north has been included in the residential portion of the property,because it is not hash-marked. Access to a residential site is a residential use. Harrison v. Building Inspector of Braintree, 350 Mass. 559 (1966). Finally, I see nothing in any other section of the ZO that denies the MRM project eligibility to apply for a PUD special permit. Section 7. 3.1,which states the purpose of the PUD provision, simply sets introductory guidelines for consideration. The core of the PUD special permit decision is (1) in the eligibility criteria of Sections 7.3.2 to 7.3.5, inclusive, and(2)the special permit granting criteria of Section 7.3.8. While the purpose clause calls for Master Plan compliance, I note that Section 7.3.8.2 allows for deviation in appropriate circumstances. Therefore, it is my opinion that the calculation of the "residential area" in the McKnight Memorandums is legally soumd. I make no representation as to whether, after application of the criteria set forth in Section 7.3.8, a special permit should be granted or denied for the MRM PUD. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding my opinion. ROOF ASSEMBLIES AND ROOFTOP STRUCTURES SECTION 1509 shall be of noncombustible, or fire retardant- ROOFTOP STRUCTURES treated wood construction. k 1509.1General.The provisions of this section shallgovernthe 3. On buildings of Type III, IV and V consuvctiion, construction of rooftop structures. the exterior walls of penthouses with a fire separa- limn distance of more than � feet (1524 nnn) and 1509.2 Penthouses.A pentwu.se or penthouses in compliance less than 20 feet(6096 mm)shall he at least I-hour with Sections 1509.2.1 dnough 1509.2.4 shall be considered as tire.resistance-rated construction. Walls with it a portion of the sorry below- fire separation disto,we of 20 feet (6096 mm) or 1509.2.1 Height above roof.A penthouse or other projec- greater front a common property line shall be of tion above the roof in structures of other than Type I con- Type IV construction or noncombustible, or .itruction shall not exceed 28 feet(8534 mm)above the roof fine-reunrdmn-rremed rrmod construction. Roofs where used as an enclosure for tanks or for elevators that run shall be constructed of materials and fire-resis- to the roof and in all other cases shall not extend more than lance rated its required in Table 601 and Section 18 feet(5486 mm)above the roof. 603, Item 25.3. Interior framing and walls shall be Type IV construction or noncombustible or 1509.2.2 Area limitation. The aggregate area of pent- )'ire-,crardam-treated wood constniction, houses and other rooftop structures shall riot exceed one-third the area of the supporting roof. Such penthouses 4. On buildings of Type I consuv. ution. unprotected shall not contribute m either the building aura or number of noncombustible enclosures housing rndy Meehan- stories as regulated by Section 503.1. The arca of the ical equipment and located with a mininmni fire penthouse shall not be included in determining the,fre urea separation distance of 20 feet (6096 mm)shall be debited in Section 902. permitted- 1509.2.3 Use limitations. A penthouse, bulkhead or any 5. On buildings of Type 1 construction two stories or other similar projection above the roof shall not be used for less above garde plane in height,or Type II.111,1 V purposes other than shelter of mechanical equipment or and \ constntcuon, unprotected noncombu sti hie shelterof vertical shaftopenings in the roof.Provisions such or Jire-rercrrdonr-treared mood enclosures housng its louvers.louver blades or Flashing shall be madetoprrnect only mechanical equipment and located with a the mechanical equipment andthe budding interiorfrom the mmimumfuesepararimt di.stanceof 20 feel(6090. a , =y Y elements.Penthouses of bulkheads used for purposes other nun) shall be permitted. .� than permitted by this section shall contorm to the require- 6- On one-story buildings, combustihle unroolcd - - menuofthiscodeforanadditionalstore.The restrictions of mechanical equipment screens. fences or similar this section shall not prohibit the placing of wood flagpoles enclosures are permitted where located with afire or similar structures on the roof of any building. separarlmn distance of it least 20 feet(6096 mm) from adjacent property lines and where not 1509.2.4 Type of construction. Penthouses shall be con- exceeding 4 feet (I_19 mui) in height above tha structed with walls,floors and roof as required for the build- ing. roof surface. 7. Dormers shall be of the same type of construction Exceptions: as the roof on which they are placed.or of the extc- L On buildings of Type I construction, the exterior riot walls of the building. walls and roofs of penthouses with afire sepam- 1509.3 Tanks.Tanks having a capacity of more than 500 gal- non di.crance of more than 5 feet(1524 nnn) and Ions (2 nn') placed in or on a building shall be supported on Tess than 20 feet (6096 mm) shall be of at least masonry, reinforced concrete, steel or Type IV construction I-hour fire resistance-rated noncombustible con- provided that, where such supports are located in the building . struction. Walls incl roofs with afire .sepatemoo above the lowestsrrm_,,the support shall be fire-resistance tater -i of 20feet(6096 nmi)orgreater shall beef as required for Type IA construction. noncombustible construction. Interior training and wallsshall beof noncombustible construction. 1509.3.1 Vahc. Such tanks shall have in the bottom or on the side near the bottom,a pipe or nutlet, fitted with it suit able On buildings of Type I construction two stories able quick opening valve for dischcuging the contents in an above ,grade plane or less in height and Type II emergency through:m adequate drain. construction,theexterior walls and roofs of pent- houses with e/nesepruariolr di.dancl-'e of more than 1509.3.2 Location. Such tanks shall not be placed over or 5feet(1524nmh)and less than 20 feet(6096 num neara line )tstnirs oran elevator shaft,Unless there Na solid shall be of at least I-hour lire-resistance-rated root or floor onderncath the tank. noncombustible or fire-retardant-treared mood 1509.3.3Tankcover.Unenclosed roottanksshall havecov- construction. Walls and roofs with afire separa ers sloping toward the outer edges. . tion distum e of 20 feet(6096 unit)or greater shall `— be of noncombustible or tire-retardant-treated 1509.4 Cooling towers. Cooling towers in excess of 250 u o0d tonstruetion. huerior framing and walls square feet 123.2 ori) in base area or in excess of I i feet 1,4572 300 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE' SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 September 18, 2012 Charles Puleo, Chair City of Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Dear Mr. Puleo: On behalf of the Applicant, MRM Project Management, LLC, and due to the anticipated absence of Board Members for the scheduled meeting on Thursday, September 20, 2012, 1 hereby request allowance to continue the public hearing for the above Applications from September 20, 2012 to the Board's next scheduled meeting. MRM Project Management, LLC By its Attorney, J seph C. Corr nti JCC:dl cc: client <a> �b�L Cltl' 61 She �', 0 GOO+ " �rOPll11T� CITY OF SALEM rpIM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Kimberley Driscoll MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STRFFT•SALLA,MASSACHUSFI IS 01970 LYNN GOWN DUNCAN,AICP TE-L: 978-619-5685 • PAX: 978-740-0404 DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM To: Planning Board From: Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP, Director, , Re: Legacy Park Apartments UA Date: September 4, 2012 Based upon the legal opinions of both Robin Stein and Mark Bobrowski and the public comments at the public hearing, as well as written comments, I have further evaluated the proposed site plan. The legal opinion by Attorney Robin Stein states in part, "As part of a review pursuant to S. 7.3.3. of a project that does not involve mixed-use buildings, the Planning Board must consider each and every part of a site and determine if the land is in residential use or used as an improvement associated therewith. All land that is exclusively used or improved for residential purposes is in residential use" Pursuant to this guidance, I have reviewed the site plan again. I believe that the open space components can generally be broken out as follows: 1. Areas adjacent to the buildings. 2. Areas adjacent to the walkway and the canal/railroad tracks 3. Parking areas 4. Driveway entrances at Harmony Grove and Grove Street 5. The buffer area generally between the retaining wall and the southwesterly property line 6. The area adjacent to the existing building proposed for commercial use I offer the following comments: 1. Areas adjacent to the buildings: a. The landscaped areas between the buildings are classified as an improvement associated with residential use. I concur. b. The open space area between buildings 2 and 3 and the ten-foot wide walkway, or a portion thereof, may be considered as an improvement associated with the residential use for the following reasons. a. There is a proposed landscaping bed immediately adjacent to the buildings, and b. There is a reasonable expectation that this area, or a portion thereof, will be used exclusively as private space by the residents of the building, rather than the general public. It will be incumbent upon the project proponent to demonstrate why some, or all, of this land should not be counted as land "in residential use". Planning Board September 4, 2012 Page 2 c. The landscaped area adjacent to building 1 is classified as an improvement associated with residential use. I concur. d. The landscaped areas between the buildings are classified as an improvement associated with the residential use. I concur. 2. The walkway and the area between the walkway and the canal/railroad tracks: The purpose of the walkway is to encourage public access along the North River Canal. However, it can only be considered "usable open space" if there is a public easement placed on this portion of the property. 3. The landscaped areas within the residential parking lots are classified as associated with residential use. I question the landscaped area adjacent to the parking lot snow storage area at the northwesterly boundary of the site. This appears to be associated with the residential parking; however, it is not shown as such. The proponent should address this issue. 4. Driveway entrances: a. At the Harmony Grove entrance it appears that the lawn area is classified as an improvement associated with residential use, but the area planted with trees and shrubs is not. The proponent should clarify the rationale for this distinction. b. At the Grove Street entrance, some of the open space is classified as an improvement associated with residential use and some is not. The proponent should clarify the rationale for this distinction. 5. The buffer area generally between the retaining wall and the southwesterly property line: This area is shown as open space, not associated with the residential development. I concur because this open space is an existing, natural vegetated area. The additional planting to secure the slope does not change the fact that it is existing open space. 6. The area adjacent to the existing building proposed for commercial use: This area is clearly associated with the commercial use. I concur with its classification. The project proponent should address the issues identified above and re-calculate the land area that is"in residential use or used as an improvement associated therewith", as applicable. 06/20/2012 14:42 FAX lihO01/002 SERAFINI, SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP Attomeys At Law 63 Federal Street .Salem, Massachusetts 01970 JOHN R.SERAFINI,SR. TELEPHONE:(978)744-0212 JOHN R.SERAFINI,JR. (781)681-2743 JOHN E.DARLING TELECOPIER:(978)741-4683 JOSEPH C.CORRENTI PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S)TO: NAME: Danielle McKnight,Clerk FIRM: City of Salem Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeal TELECOPIER NUMBER: (978)740-0404 FROM: Joseph C.Correnti,Esquire PAGES( including this cover sheet): 2 DATE SENT: June 20,2012 CLIENT NUMBER: MESSAGE: If there is a problem with this transmission,call(978)7440212 and ask for: Denese Luxton CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE THE DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING THIS TELECOPY TRANSMISSION CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM THE LAW FIRM OF SERAFINI, SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP WHICH IS CONFIDENTIAL OR PRIVILEGED. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED TO BE FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ON THIS TRANSMISSION SHEET. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,BE AWARE THAT ANY DISCLOSURE,COPYING,DISTRIBUTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS TELECOPIED INFORMATION IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TELECOPY IN ERROR,PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE IMMEDIATELY SO THAT WE CAN ARRANGE FOR THE RETRIEVAL OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. 06/20/2012 14:42 FAX 1a002/002 SERAFIN.I, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R- SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E.CARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4663 June 20, 2012 Charles Puleo, Chair City of Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Dear Mr. Puleo: On behalf of the Applicant, MRM Project Management, LLC, I hereby request allowance to continue the public hearing for the above Applications from June 21, 2012 to the Board's next regularly scheduled meeting. MRM Project Management, LLC By its Attorney, OJ'os7phC. Correnti JCC:dl cc: client RECC;`., ED JUN 2 0 2012 DE PT:OFPLA 11NIN IL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Griffin Lngineerino OUID, LLC �K February 2, 2012 Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLP 63 Federal Street Salem, Massachusetts 01979 Subject: Proposed Salem Oil & Grease Site Redevelopment 64 Grove Street Comments Concerning Non-Residential Space on Plan Dear Attorney Correnti: This letter responds to the January 30`h communication from Mr. James Treadwell to the Salem Planning Department, wherein he opines that our plans mischaracterize non-residential space at the site. Mr. Treadwell identifies two areas that he believes should not be characterized as non-residential space. the green strip between Building no. 2 and the North River Canal; and, the vegetated natural buffer between the proposed parking lot retaining wall and residential properties along Beaver Street. The green strip is dedicated to the proposed North River Canal walkway. The walkway will be made available for public use, and is not specific to the residential uses occurring on other portions of the site. The landscaping in the green strip is integral to the walkway and has been tailored for walkway use. Although Legacy Apartments residents may also use the walkway and enjoy the adjacent landscaping, the primary use and design intent of this portion of the site is the non-residential, public access North River Canal walkway. The vegetated natural buffer between the proposed retaining wall and Beaver Street is heavily vegetated today with a mixture of shrubs, trees and undergrowth and will remain so. Access to this portion of the site is difficult, due to steep Phone 978-927-5111 Fax 978-927-5103 www.griffineng.com H"Ges 3 M..�l Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire Re: Proposed Salem Oil & Grease Site Redevelopment February 2, 2012 Page 2 topography and the height of the retaining wall. Residential use of this portion of the site is impossible. We trust the above addresses the comments raised. Should you have any further questions or comments, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, GRIFFIN ENG�E�ROUP, LLC k � - Robert H. Griffin, PIE i i SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI. LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. JOHN E. DARLING TELEPHONENva�y p �ijp1 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI n Il '? tl ^ [.� 978-744-0212 PP FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 FEB 2 ?n1? DEFT. ��,rI- .;'' ,Ir.:. February 22, 2012 C00.11`i;i.'ralyi , rkiENT Charles Puleo, Chair City of Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Dear Chairman Puleo: At the last public hearing for the above referenced project, a question was raised by a member of the public as to the ownership of 3 Harmony Grove Road. Attached please find a deed dated May 23, 2006 and recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 25700, Page 109, transferring ownership of 60 Grove Street, 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road to MRM Project Management, LLC, the Applicant in the above referenced project. Additionally, the conveyancing attorney representing the Applicant in the 2006 acquisition has reviewed the Deed and back title to the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel, as well as spoken with the attorney for the cemetery, and is firmly of the opinion that ownership of that parcel resides in the Applicant, as reflected in the Deed. Try truly ro� o!j'C. nti JCC:dl cc: client �4coNprre , CITY OF SALEM 4 LEGAL DEPARTMENT Y •��MIN6.,.,;, 93 WAS[I I NM ON S'1'RF.ILISALI'1v1,N4ASSACI[USF:CI'S 01970 'rr1.:978-745-9595 4 PAX:978-744-1279 hl\tiwiu.4Y DRISCOLL FLIZAM 111 IlFNNARD,FSQ. ROBIN S'1I'ISIN, SQ. MAYOR CITY SOLICIT Oil ."SI.Q 1Y SOLICf1'Olt To: Tom Devine, Conservation Agent From: Elizabeth Rennard, City Solicitor Re: Riverfront Area- Historic Mill Exemption (Salem Oil and Grease Site) Date: July 14, 2011 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You have asked this office to provide guidance on a request by MRM Project Management, LLC (MRM) for an exemption to the riverfront area regulations based on the site's, the former Salem Oil and Grease, location along a man-made canal and status as an historic mill complex. As you know, the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, 310 CMR 10.58(1) -10.58(5) provides that "where a proposed activity involves work within the riverfront area, the issuing authority shall presume that the area is significant to protect the private or public water supply; to protect the groundwater; to provide flood control; to prevent storm damage; to prevent pollution; to protect land containing shellfish; to protect wildlife habitat; and to protect fisheries." However, the Regulations also provides that "In those portions so extensively altered by human activity that their important wildlife habitat functions have been effectively eliminated, riverfront areas are not significant to the protection of important wildlife habitat and vernal pool habitat." 310 CMR 10.58. One such altered area that the Regulation exempts are "manmade canals associated with coastal rivers..." 310 CMR 10.58 (2)(a)1.g The history of the development of the North River Canal and its relationship to a portion of the Salem Oil and Grease site appears to have been well documented by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC (Griffin) on behalf of MRM. If the Commission determines that the waterway running though the site is in fact a man-made canal, a portion of the site may be entitled this exemption. The Regulations further provide that, "Notwithstanding the Provisions of 310 CMR 10.58(1) through (5), Certain Activities or Areas are Grandfathered or Exempted from Requirements for the Riverfront Area" One such activity is "Activities on land occupied by historic mill complexes." A "Historic Mill Complex" means the "mill complexes in ... existence prior to 1946 and situated landward of the waterside facade of a retaining wall, building, sluiceway, or other structure existing on August 7, 1996. An historic mill also means any historic mill included on the Massachusetts Register of Historic Places. An historic mill complex includes only the footprint of the area that is or was occupied by interrelated buildings (manufacturing buildings, housing, utilities, parking areas, and driveways) constructed before and existing after 1946, used for any type of manufacturing or mechanical processing and including associated structures to provide water for processing, to generate water power, or for water transportation." 310 CMR 10.04 The documentation provided by Griffin shows that the site contained several manufacturing facilities prior to 1946. The Commission must determine, by reviewing the documentation provided by Griffin and after examination of the Griffin engineers present at the Commission meeting, the exact footprint of any exempted area. The footprint may only include the area that is or was occupied by interrelated buildings, utilities, parking areas, and driveways constructed before and existing after 1946. In closing, the commission must determine the area, if any, that is subject an exemption based on the conditions set forth in the Regulations. Please fee free to contact me if I can be of further assistance. ��o^,Ut2;89 I CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board FROM: Tom Devine, Conservation Agent/Staff Planner DATE: January 11, 2012 RE: Comments on application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review, and Wetlands &Flood Hazard District Special Permit for 3 Harmony Grove Rd. and 60-64 Grove St. (Former Salem Oil&Grease) Appeal of Order of Resource Area Delineation, DEP#64-516 This project is within area subject to the Wetlands Protection Act and will require submittal of a notice of intent to the Conservation Commission. The Commission's July 2011 order of resource area delineation for this property has been appealed by residents. Depending on the outcome of that appeal,the proposed plans may need to be modified to comply with the requirements of the Wetlands Protection Act. 7 L 51RIa r uNE b NY GROVE PLAN OF LAND > FLOOD �� U !�'/ T>IhJc- 11 IF n✓klr r I !_0V- o..n`o -AREA S �! _. 5^LEN,, MASS... .: � \ a -/ti - - AS SLIRVEYEO FOR ...... 1,200 tC� ;��/� E '�"�'1_ 8LU®BER 9-4 -Ry TRU STS Y 1 14 Noi?T' 3R1� 2pq REALT s a�� APRIL 1% 1979 MA SSAG +ZU.' Sf]' i ,_� c, d N .. -� r 1q. i =q RO'eR /y, 'Fh ,. corJ t ER o ao. Ro oo` . FOU.^( d �' - .. . .. O 1.(iq R.CFI`IO} a CRO PeR GANENf `9S�r V..`3i.lj N6��,.. N WqY ! rr;.NE 5 3 y Ey v MER SO, \ n �/ S 7 �\\ �' �.�� $ A 29:. °.z aC M., I �V o, `✓ln-F Al 7 � Rq\ 2� o � - lb �..Oc T' "u ,/ •,, :r/ a:.."C.,/f - NSIo f.( J _. 15 "r R,1NCI5 L. ARDSy� O 5 S. 4 MFT/ S �� AG�ORlTY� Z3 (SF I 3 ;is. 9l. 9 43oe5 ! . so " e o ✓ N,< ly 4/ 1 en h� z c— E 7 o n �s�}�� f � �6�� 30 ' /:i O > �3� x '043 n'Fs r 1 n OD V' f. VV 2 p `y1an,-. - _ ,\ ii �Fw J4� ` ` '•at. '/ 'S SB SE „ 13, -538 8- lv �a m nNC. y,.A - LL \-� -� ' v gnC,,J c �a --.\ N6.` Wq P ST ti 'LAE. 'ROPr RrY LINES SHOWN A'-tE THE L'uES J_,. _, �4 ip CiI� CIn,G �XISTINb OWNERSH,PS, AND THE LIN CE`F -�\\ ( 4 W 0 nJHI In 451W BU'Cq s!O .3r 1II: OF ,>-REETS AND WAYS SFT%3, ' ARE THO`F \ � `,.m P'.I AES OR PRIVATE STREET] JR \FAY_, AL RE G F E_1.L15H EU, .AND NO NEW _WEo FOH J :ISIOP^J \ ET 4y„p -n` ,�,q ^ `f it new- 5 '`i7- ,� 1 ��f,� 9�8T� FLOOD D15TRICT LINE- OF ErIST'NG OW�NERSIIIP OR POR NE.`N WAYS Lr F-I OD 1 Ii RI EVERY- AR 39�U -, A Ntlt�Ii. OF It115 I IN I1,F `LC]OU SON"J A .I:SrS�L Y� / , \\ 7e r�N vl iJ..9R1> >.'4..�1 /.ftF'.,4 iPROS P f LOM' r9 / .5s S2 S W I19A 14 a, 510 ' S �4 \ \ y ` - NbG I O W 5133 PET=nR lyt b v RU's ,S -.._601{W 6.LC f '16 E'6 \\ \\:'\� IN JI 19 9E ,30 1��- 40" 2d I• N v(.S�J / r s✓ \�; rit4' 09�i?E 7.39 I `.. Xk'Y , �s+_Lows �1� r ppp � - s� \. b .lsovJ PIAN BOOWp� PLAN 2iUN � \� �., tT �_ bll ittMtl4i'✓tY MCIRd NORR 't� l/ $ tCi��~ ,_ , .t .•-K r �E,'.I_. �� IS22. fC�h S28gr7.51 ' I!.[�i %1 , : �dCG,/^ � /\\ 122 •a lu\ 0 ) R l '3CC _ 0.50' s . . CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPAIMMENT t 130 WASHINGTON STREET,31" FLOOR "• ;�.„Vis`* TEL. (973) 745-9595 F;kx(973) 740-9346 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL NIAYOR THOMAS ST.PIE RRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER exterior walls. Where the finished ground level slopes away from the exterior walls, the reference plane shall be established by the lowest points within the area between the building and the lot line or, where the lot line is more than six feet from the building ,between the building and a point six feet from the building." Looking at the site plan ,sheet number C-4 ,provided by Griffin Engineering, the most severe case is building number 43. The Garage elevation is at I I feet and the finished floor above(first floor ) is at 21 feet. This gives you an average grade plain of 16 feet. The floor above is 21 feet for a difference of 5 feet. Also the finished tloor(garage l I feet) to finish floor(first 21 feet) is a 10 foot difference. At no point is the finished first floor more than 12 feet above the finished ground level nor is it more than six feet above the "Grade Plane" In my opinion, the garage is not a story above grade plane. If further information is required ,please let me know. Sincere, , Thomas St. itcrre Building Corn missioner/Zoning Officer CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS ,[ Z,;:; BuIt.DINc DEPARTMENT %.; t20 WASHINGCON STREET,Y" FLOOR TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAX(973) 740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR THONtAS ST.PIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPE RTY/BUILD[NG COMMISSIONER April 12, 2012 Danielle McKnight Planning Department City of Salem Dear Danielle, You have asked ,on behalf of the Planning Board, for some detail regarding the definition of"story" as defined in the Mass. State Building Code . I Understand this concerns the project at the old Salem Oil and Grease site. The Salem Zoning Ordinance defers to the Mass State Building Code for a definition c f"Story". As described in the Eighth edition of the Mass State building Code(which consists if the LB.C. code with Mass amendments) .,The definition of a story is " That portion of a bnilding included between the Lipper Surface of a floor and the upper surface of the floor or roof next above (also see Basement and Mezzanine in section 502.1) It is measured as the vertical distance from the top of two successive tiers of beams or finished floor surfaces and,'for the topmost story, from the top of the floor finish to the top of the ceilin;joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters. At first look this would be a simple way to address the number of stories. However, if this simple definition was used, the basement of residential homes would count as a story and only ranches would be able to be cOnsttucted Under our zoning ordinance. We have had to address this issue on previous projects in the City, most recently the residential buildings behind Hillcrest Chevrolet. The definitions of story become critical due to the fact that building materials and construction methods have to change.. Therefore" Story above grade plane " becomes the important calculation. ft is this definition, that I have used to determine the number of stories in buildings . 'File definition ofstory above grade plane is " Any story having its finished floor surface entirely above grade plain, or in which the finished surface of the floor next above is: I. Nlore than 6 tcet above grade plane; or 2. .Nlore than 12 1�cct above the finished ground ICVCI at any point. " The definition Of"Grade Plane is tound in sution 503. 1 Ofthe Stste Building Codc and is aS t'0llows "A rclercnce plane Ieprescnting the average Of finished CvT1 adjoining the building at the REcEIVED SERAFINI , DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW JUL 18 2012 63 FEDERAL STREET 0p-2�"�'�7 !�1- SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 r 0" k4"(*i1YU" LLOPMCN7 JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 July 18, 2012 Charles Puleo, Chair City of Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Dear Mr. Puleo: On behalf of the Applicant, MRM Project Management, LLC, and due to the anticipated absence of Board Members for the regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, July 19, 2012, 1 hereby request allowance to continue the public hearing for the above Applications from July 19, 2012 to the Board's next regularly scheduled meeting on September 6, 2012. MRM Project Management, LLC By .its Attorney, o_se/ph_C. C menti JCC:dI cc: client SERAFINI , DARLING & CORRENTI. LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4683 April 13, 2012 Charles Puleo, Chair City of Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Dear Mr. Puleo: On behalf of the Applicant, MRM Project Management, LLC, due to the expected absence of Board members, I hereby request allowance to continue the public hearing for the above Applications from April 19, 2012 to the Board's next `regularly scheduled meeting on May 3, 2012. MRM Project Management, LLC By its Attorney, do7eph C. C Frenti JCC:dl cc: client 1N3WdOl�f.;:1 Al,"VI14ky:,p� V`JP4IMiw-w jo ldjp 1102 s t add ®3AI R ,;< � °a SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP 4"" '1 ' ATTORNEYS AT LAW FEBE2 ]�'^ 2012 63 FEDERAL STREET L SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 DEQ. Or PLtif,01P;C?a COR-0MUMTY f' :`i-LOP IEMT JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 978-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 978-741-4663 February 28, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Dear Danielle: As requested in connection with the above project, enclosed please find three additional sets of full sized plans dated December 20, 2011, prepared by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC. If you require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, ,Joseph C. Correnti Enclosures SERAF-INI , DARLING & CORRENTI . LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING �1pp�� 976-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI R��//�/� r".a� tf— FACSIMILE Y: 978-741-4683 FEB 22 '012 DEPT OF P=-`J N'II�" ' February 22, 2012 CO&1NLINI11Y I-OP FNT Charles Puleo, Chair City of Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Dear Chairman Puleo: At the last public hearing for the above referenced project, a question was raised by a member of the public as to the ownership of 3 Harmony Grove Road. Attached please find a deed dated May 23, 2006 and recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 25700, Page 109, transferring ownership of 60 Grove Street, 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road to MRM Project Management, LLC, the Applicant in the above referenced project. Additionally, the conveyancing attorney representing the Applicant in the 2006 acquisition has reviewed the Deed and back title to the 3 Harmony Grove Road parcel, as well as spoken with the attorney for the cemetery, and is firmly of the opinion that ownership of that parcel resides in the Applicant, as reflected in the Deed. yophu orrenti JCC:dI cc: client J '` 2006052400158 Bk;25100 Pg;109 DEED Or,/2412006 11,00:00 DEED Pp 1/2 Property Address: 60 and 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road,Salem,MA Erik K. Smith,Trustee of Blubber Hollow Realty Trust under Declaration of Trust dated June 18, 1965,recorded at Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 5292,Page 170,for consideration of$214,000.00 paid and other valuable consideration,hereby grants to MRM Project Management,LLC, a limited liability company duly organized and validly existing under athe laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts of 9 Abbott Street,Beverly,MA 01915 with quitclaim covenants, r All of the land in Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, described as Parcel One, Parcel Two, S Parcel Four, Paicel Five, and Parcel Six in deed dated June 1, 1967, from Salem Oil & Grease M Co.to the Trustees of Blubber Hollow Realty Trust, recorded at Essex South District Registry of Wt Deeds in Book 5452,Page 120,meaning and intending to describe the land shown-is Assessor's Parcels 236 and 237 on Assessor's Plan#16, and is the land shown on Plan recorded with said 7 Registry in Plan Book 152, Plan 98, as the parcel containing 5.44 acres (excepting a portion thereof which was transferred by Deed Sled as Document 406956 at the Southem Registry -.-I- e~- District for Essex County), the parcel containing 26,945 square feet, and the parcel described in `y O Deed recorded at said Registry in Book 7654,Page 26;and t All of the land in Salem, Essex County,Massachusetts,contained within Assessor's Parcel 9239 on Assessor's Plan#16,known as 3 Harmony Grove Road,which land consists of q (a) The parcel of land in Salem,Essex County,Massachusetts, shown on a plan recorded at -a said Registry in Plan Book 152, Plan 98, as containing"Area 20,990 square feet", lying \Q V' between the railroad tracks now or formerly of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and the North River;and (b) the triangular parcel of land bounded Northeasterly by Harmony Grove Road, about 115 feet, Southwesterly by the old canal about 112 feet, and Southeasterly by land of Harmony Grove Cemetery Corporation about 28 feet, described in deed from Robert L. Smith to Robert L. Smith et al, Trustees of Blubber Hollow Realty Trust recorded at said Registry in Book 5292,Page 183;and (c) all of the land and flats which are appurtenant to all of the above-described parcels of land, lying Northerly and Northeasterly of the location of the Boston and Maine Railroad,as described in deed recorded at said Registry in Book 5292,Page 183; and (°ai�ti COX (d) the land shown on Plan recorded at Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Plan Book 152, Plan 98, which is bounded Southerly by the North River, Easterly by land of-- Harmony f—Harmony Grove Cemetery Corporation;Northeasterly by the triangular parcel described above in subparagraph(b),Northerly by Harmony Grove Road, and Westerly by land of the Harmony Grove Cemetery Corporation;and (e) such portions of the said Assessor's Parcel 239 as are located within the boundaries of the North River,subject to the rights of others thereto,if any. Said land is conveyed together with the right to pass and repass on foot and with vehicles, in common with Boston and Maine Corporation, and its successors and assigns, and with others now or hereafter having rights therein, on, over and across a tract of land containing about 894 square feet of land and shown as "Permanent (crossing) Easement" on the plan recorded with Deed from Boston and Maine Corporation to the Grantor, dated February 10, 1967, at said Registry in Book 5452, Page 111, subject to the restrictions, reservations and agreements contained in said Deed. Executed as a sealed instrument this Z3 day of May,2 •t Erik K. Smith,Trustee --- - COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Essex,SS On this day of May, 2006,before me, the undersigned notary public,personally appeared Erik K. Smith,Trustee as aforesaid,proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was currently valid Massachusetts driver's license issued by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles, to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding document,and acknowledged to me that he signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. Notary— Public T My commission expires: 1 2--R` r0 CARLA F:VRWt4190_05-0807decd to l.LC.doc Notary PuhlIc SFrl hi Commonwealth ofMassachusetta DEEMpp OocemhCammlaslaner17,287�phes0�G_1Q ES � VJ 05/24/06 10:58AM 01 JI 000000 H3680 _ ;915.84 RECEIVED SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI , LLP JAN 1 /' 2012 DEPT.OF PLtINh!IN3& ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET COA6Mu?"IT/DEVELOPMENT SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN E. DARLING 976-744-0212 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI FACSIMILE 976-741-4663 January 13, 2012 Charles Puleo, Chair City of Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Legacy Park Apartments at Harmony Grove Road Application for Planned Unit Development, Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit 3 Harmony Grove Road and 60 & 64 Grove Street Dear Mr. Puleo: On behalf of the Applicant, MRM Project Management, LLC, I hereby request allowance to continue the public hearing for the above Applications from January 19, 2012 to the Board's next regularly scheduled meeting on February 2, 2012. MRM Project Management, LLC y its Attorney, Joseph C. or enti JCC:dI cc: client Griffin Engineering Group,LLC September 4, 2012 Ms. Danielle McKnight , Staff Planer Salem Planning & Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3'd Floor Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Proposed Salem Oil & Grease Site Redevelopment 60&64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road Dear Ms. McKnight: As requested, please find an enclosed copy of the revised plan set for the subject project dated June 20, 2012. Should you have any questions or comments, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, GRIFFIN ENGINEERIVG GROUP, LLC Robert H. Grill P.E. Enclosure: As Noted Cc: J. Correnti, Esq. (Letter Only) Phone 978-927-5111 Fax 978-927-5103 www.griffineng.com Dep0.r''k� rovinmev�t- Page 1 of") Danielle McKnight From: Larry Ramdin Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:30 AM To: Danielle McKnight Subject: RE: Legacy Park Apartments Danielle, They have to provide the into, I think it best to have the developer call rue so I can apprire il-em r v=r.tt to ue done. The Pest control survey has to be done prior to commencement of construction > There has to be a prebaiting program in place > On ongoing post monitoring program and a program to respond to corr.pl:.,itits From abr.m,rs > A written description of the program and ongoing results of pest control s to. visits has to be avriTibiv for inspection > The reports must include any rodent activity and actions taken. The locations should be mapped and activity identified by location of stations Sincerely Larry Larry Ramdin Health Agent Salem Board of Health 1.20 Washington Street , 4th floor Salem MA 01970 978-741-1.800 (phone) 978-745-0343(fax) From: Danielle McKnight Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 8:35 AM To: Larry Ramdin Subject: RE: Legacy Park Apartments OK—do they need to make a separate application to you? Danielle McKnight Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, Third Floor Salem, MA 01970 (978) 619-5685 dmcknight(a salem.com From: Larry Ramdin Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 4:09 PM To: Danielle McKnight 9/19/2012 Subject: RE: Legacy Park Apartments I review and approve the. rodent control plan.The builder has to have a pest control comp3ily C, develop a control plan for rats and other pests Sincerely Larry Larry Ramclin Hcalth Agent Salem Board of Health 120 Washington Street , 4th floor Salem MA 01970 978-741-1800 (phone) From: Danielle McKnight Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 9:06 AM To: Larry Ramdin Subject: RE: Legacy Park Apartments What exactly does the Board of Health require for rodent control? The neighbors have expressed concerns that there are rats in the vicinity, and they want to make sure this is dealt with during construction. Is there a separate regulation for this, or do you approve a rodent control plan? Danielle McKnight Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, Third Floor Salem, MA 01970 (970) 518`5005 From: Larry Kamdin Sent: Monday, September 10, 201Z12:47PM To: Danielle McKnight Subject: Legacy Park Apartments Danielle, The following are the BOH comments onLegacy Park apartments � w The units must comply with all the requirements ofChapter || ofthe State Sanitary code: l05[M84l0including but not limited to oscreens for windows o Adequate trash disposal facilities Page 3 of 3 o Adequate ventilation o Provide heating during the heating season at the required temperatures • Building owner is required to ensure that adequate contingencies are in place to address pest control/remediation • Provide a mosquito control plan for the catch basins • ALL units that are rented must be granted a certificate of fitness by the Board of Health prior to occupancy. A copy has to be provided to the renter • If the units are sub-metered then owner must fill sub-metering affidavit for each individual unit prior to renting unit. If the affidavit is not filed ,tenant cannot be charged for water • A trash disposal plan to ensure there is adequate capacity for storage of trash onsite. Contingencies to address tenant changeovers and other high trash disposal events. Sincerely Larry Larry Ramdin Health Agent Salem Board of Health 120 Washington Street , 4th floor Salem MA 01970 978-741-1800 (phone) 978-745-0343(fax) 9/19/2012 Paye 1 of 17 Danielle McKnight From: Larry Ramdin Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 12:47 PM 'To: Danielle McKnight Subject: Legacy Park Apartments Danielle, The following are the BOH comments on Legacy Park apartments • The units must comply with all the requirements of Chapter II of the State Sanitary code: 105CMR410 including but not limited to o screens for windows o Adequate trash disposal facilities o Adequate ventilation o Provide heating during the heating season at the required temperatures • Building owner is required to ensure that adequate contingencies are in place to address pest control/remediation • Provide a mosquito control plan for the catch basins • ALL units that are rented must be granted a certificate of fitness by the Board of Health prior to occupancy. A copy has to be provided to the renter • If the units are sub-metered then owner must fill sub-metering affidavit for each individual unit prior to renting unit. If the affidavit is not filed , tenant cannot be charged for water • A trash disposal plan to ensure there is adequate capacity for storage of trash onsite. Contingencies to address tenant changeovers and other high trash disposal events. Sincerely Larry Larry Ramdin Health Agent Salem Board of Health 120 Washington Street, 4th floor Salem MA 01970 978-741-1800 (phone) 978-745-0343(fax) 9/10/2012 Page I of' I Danielle McKnight From: Larry Ramdin Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:49 PM To: Danielle McKnight Subject: Submetering of water in rental units Attachments: hsg-submeter-form.pdf, hsg-submeter-memo.pdf Danielle, As the Salem Oil and Grease project moves forward under the State Sanitary Code landlords can charge for water use under specific conditions, the here has to be a sub-meter installed specific to each unit; the landlord has to install low-flow devices in the units and they installation has to be certified by the installing plumber, a sub-metering notice has to be filed with the Board of Health, prior to charging for water. They cannot charge existing tenants' for water use. Attached is a copy of the sub-metering notification form and accompanying memo Please feel free to contact me if you have questions Sincerely Larry Larry Ramdin Health Agent Salem Board of Health 120 Washington Street, 4th floor Salem MA 01970 978-741-1800 (phone) 978-745-0343(fax) 7/30/2012 MASSACHUSETTS DEP.ARTNIENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SU13NIETERING OF WATER AND SEWER CERTIFICATION FORK[ In accordance with M.G.L. c. IS6, §22 and 105 CMR 410.000: Minimum Standards of Fitness for Fluman Habitation (State Sanitary Code Chapter II), the following dwelling unit is eligible for the imposition on the tenants of a charge for water and/or sewer service. PROPERTY INFORMATION Address: Unit# # Of'units in bld �. Cit /Town: MA Zip Code: EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION INFORMATION 105 CMR 410.000 requires the installation of water conservation devices prior to a dwelling unit becoming eligible For the imposition on tenants of a charge for water and/or sewer. The devices must meet the following specifications: Showerheads with maximum flow rate not to exceed 2 /�gallons per minute(2.5 gpm) Faucets with maximum flow rate not to exceed 2'"0 gallons per minute (2.2 gpm) Ultra low flush water closets(toilets) not to exceed 1 6 r10 gallons per flush(1.6 gpf) The submetering equipment used to measure the quantity of water used for each dwelling unit and common area must meet the standards of accuracy and testing of the American Water Works Association or similar accredited association. A licensed plumber must install the water closets and submetering equipment. Submetering equipment information: Manufacturer Model # Licensed Plumber Certification Print Name of Plumber License# Date I certify that(check all that apply): ❑l have installed the submetering equipment listed above in accordance with accepted plumbing standards. ❑ I have installed one or more water closets not exceeding 1.6 gallons per flush. ❑ Determined that existing water closets do not exceed 1.6 gallons per flush. F-1Theplumbing permit issued by the city/town, if required, is attached. ❑ Dwelling unit is connected directly to a meter installed by a water company and, in accordance with M.G.L. c. 136, § 22(p),does not require the installation of a submeter. Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury, Signature of Licensed Plumber Property Owner Certification I certify that: (1) This dwelling unit is eligible for the imposition on the tenants of a charge for water and/or sewer usage in accordance with the water submetering law (MGL c. 136, §22); (2) All showerheads, faucets,and water closets in this dwelling unit are water conservation devices that meet the standards specified above; (3)The water submeter measuring the use of water in the dwelling unit was installed by a licensed plumber and is in compliance with the standards specified above,or the water meter measuring the use of water in this dwelling unit was installed by a"water company" as defined in M.G.L. c. IS6, § 22; (4)The water meter or submeter measures the water usage exclusive to this unit, (5) I will provide to the tenants of this dwelling unit,prior to occupancy, a written rental agreement that clearly provides for the separate charging of water and/or sewer service,and a copy of this certification form; (6) That all information included on this certification is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury, Print Name of Owner Signature of Owner Date Board of Health/Flealth Department Received B Datc NIDPli/CSP Submetcring Cortitication Form, Revised 10/06 _ The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Department of Public Health Center for Environmental Health MITT ROMNEY Community Sanitation Program GOVERNOR 250 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02108-4619 KERRY HEALEY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR RONALD PRESTON SECRETARY PAUL].COTE,JR, COMMISSIONER MEMORANDUM TO: Massachusetts Local Boards of Health FROM: Paul Halfmann, Assistant Director Community Sanitation Program DATE: Niay 2, 2005 RE: Submetering of Water Revisions to 105 CMR 410.000 On December 16, 2004, the Governor signed Chapter 417 of the Acts of 2004, entitled An zl cl Authorizing (Vater Submetering in Residential Tenancies(hereafter referred to as the "Act"). This Act became effective March 16, 2005. The Act, codified as M.G.L. c. 136, §22, authorizes landlords of residential property to separately charge tenants for actual water and sewer service costs provided that allofthe comprehensive requirements of the Act are met. Among its many specific provisions, the Act: • Prohibits water submetering unless the dwelling unit is separately submetered or, for single-family rentals, the water usage is under the complete control of the tenant, to ensure that tenants are only charged for water actually Used; • Requires landlords to have licensed plumbers install any water submetering devices at the expense of the landlord; • Requires landlords to certify in writing to the local Board of Health that the Clwelling unit is in compliance with the requirements of the Act prior to separately charging for water or sewer service and to have a written agreement with tenants; • Requires water conservation devices on all showerheads, sinks and toilets, at the landlord's expense, prior to separately charging for water or sewer service; Pale I of 2 • Permits water submetering only in new tenancies created after the effective date of the Act, except that water submetering is not permitted in public housing dwelling units; • Provides a process for tenants to report leaks, contest bills, and question the accuracy of water submeters and to only pay for water costs resulting from actual use; • Requires landlords to remain as the water company customer and to be responsible for payment of water supplied by the water company; • Prohibits landlords from shutting off water to a residential dwelling for non-payment of water or sewer costs but permits landlords to pursue all other legal remedies to collect bills, including deducting unpaid bills from security deposits; • Authorizes the Department of Public Health to promulgate such additional regulations to the state sanitary code as it determines to be necessary to implement this section. Enclosed you will find a copy of the revised regulations, 105 CMR 410.000, and the SUBMETERING OF WATER AND SEWER CERTIFICATION FORM. Any landlord planning to charge tenants for the use of water and sewer must use the certification form attached. The Community Sanitation Program is in the process of placing the certification form and revi1865§d22 ay be downloaded bytvis ting/httpl//wwv Lo dplt'cic, dls/Il11.1 1 A copy oFM.G.L. c. regulationsI v.mass.gov/legi vs/mgl/186-22.hhn. Page 2 of 2 ITS OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR RE VIEW COMMENTS DATE: 12/27/11 TO: ( ) BUILDING INSPECTOR (,CONSERVATION COMM ( ) CITY ENGINEER O FIRE PREVENTION ( ) BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to Section VII of the Zoning Ordnance and/or to the Subdivision Regulations and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to Danielle McKniglii, dmclmieht@salem.com, 97 -019_568 . ( ) Definitive Subdivision Plan O Waiver from Frontage ( ) Drive-Through Special Permit (x) Planned Unit Development (x) Site Plan Review ( ) Business Park Development District O Wireless Communication Facilities Special Permit O North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permit (x) Wetlands &Flood Hazard District Special Permit APPLICANT: MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC PROJECT NAME &ADDRESS: LEGACY PARK AT HARMONY GROVE ROAD (3 HARMONY GROVE RD. &60-64 GROVE ST.) CONTACT PERSON: Joseph Correnti,978-744-0212 COMMENTS DUE: 1/31/12 (Failure to comment within 35 days shall be deemed lack of opposition). O CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) O NEED MORE INFORMATION(Explain on reverse side) O CANNOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) (COMMENTS INCLUDED Reviewer's Si tat ne Title Da e it, 7 Al �,ITY OFSALEM PLANNING' BOARD REQUEST FOR RE VIEW COMMENTS DATE: 12127111 TO: (BUILDING INSPECTOR ( ) CONSERVATION COMM ( ) CITY ENGINEER ( ) FIRE PREVENTION O BOARD OF HEALTH Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to Section VII of the Zoning Ordinance and/or to the Subdivision Regulations and MGL Chapter 41. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to Danielle McKnight, dmckmem(a),salem.com, 478-fi 19-5685. O Definitive Subdivision Plan ( ) Waiver from Frontage O Drive-Through Special Permit (x) Planned Unit Development (x) Site Plan Review O Business Park Development District O Wireless Communication Facilities Special.Permit O North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permit (x) Wetlands & Flood Hazard District Special Permit APPLICANT: MRM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLC PROJECT NAME &ADDRESS: LEGACY PARK AT HARMONY GROVE ROAD (3 HARMONY GROVE RD. &60-64 GROVE ST.) CONTACT PERSON: Joseph Correnti,978-744-0212 COMMENTS DUE: 1/31/12 (Failure to comment within 35 days shall be deemed lack of opposition). O CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) O NEED MORE INFORMATION(Explain on reverse side) O CANNOT CONCUR WITH PROPOSAL (Explain on reverse side) COMMENTS INCLUDED Reviewers Signature Title Date „ - G�v� oC eve, 0,07 4- Sy6leti/L 70 GLti v2� CJ'c( ^� Ja'U fl 40r,h 12 l i �.j Illlllillpllllllll�lllll�lllllllll U 2006052400158 4;25700 PgA09 DEED 06/2412006 11:eei60 DEED PO 112 Property Address: 60 and 64 Grove Street and 3 Harmony Grove Road,Salem,MA Erik K. Smith,Trustee of Blubber Hollow Realty Trust under Declaration of Trust dated June_ 18, 1965,recorded at Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 5292,Page 170,for consideration of$214,000.00 paid and other valuable consideration,hereby grants to MRM Project Management,LLC, a limited liability company duly organized and validly existing under athe laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts of 9 Abbott Street,Beverly,MA 01915 with �o r quitclaim covenants, All of the land in Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, described as Parcel One, Parcel Two, 7o Parcel Four, Patcel Five, and Parcel Six in deed dated June 1, 1967, from Salem Oil & Grease r'^ Co.to the Trustees of Blubber Hollow Realty Trust,recorded at Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 5452,Page 120,meaning and intending to describe the land shown-is Assessor's Parcels 236 and 237 on Assessor's Plan#16, and is the land shown on Plan recorded with said oRegistry in Plan Book 152, Plan 98, as the parcel containing 5.44 acres (excepting a portion thereof which was transferred by Deed Sled as Document 406956 at the Southern Registry e District for Essex County), the parcel containing 26,945 square feet, and the parcel described in `y Deed recorded at said Registry in Book 7654,Page 26;and All of the land in Salem, Essex County,Massachusetts,contained within Assessor's Parcel#239 ? on Assessor's Plan#16,known as 3 Harmony Grove Road,which land consists of 0 (a) The parcel of land in Salem,Essex County,Massachusetts, shown on a plan recorded at Q —,qq said Registry in Plan Book 152,Plan 98, as containing"Area 20,990 square feet", lying �g V, between the railroad tracks now or formerly of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and the North River;and (b) the triangular parcel of land bounded Northeasterly by Harmony Grove Road, about 115 feet, Southwesterly by the old canal about 112 feet, and Southeasterly by land of Harmony Grove Cemetery Corporation about 28 feet, described in deed from Robert L. Smith to Robert L. Smith et al, Trustees of Blubber Hollow Realty Trust recorded at said Registry in Book 5292,Page 183;and (c) all of the land and flats which are appurtenant to all of the above-described parcels of land, lying Northerly and Northeasterly of the location of the Boston and Maine Railroad,as described in deed recorded at said Registry in Book 5292,Page 183; and cn,Iq r x _-- F(d) the land shown on Plan recorded at Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Plan Book 152, Plan 98, which is bounded Southerly by the North River, Easterly by land of-- Harmony Grove Cemetery Corporation;Northeasterly by the triangular parcel described above in subparagraph(b),Northerly by Harmony Grove Road, and Westerly by land of the Harmony Grove Cemetery Corporation;and (c) such portions of the said Assessor's Parcel 239 as are located within the boundaries of the North River,subject to the rights of others thereto,if any. Said land is conveyed together with the right to pass and repass on foot and with vehicles, in common with Boston and Maine Corporation, and its successors and assigns, and with others now or hereafter having rights therein, on, over and across a tract of land containing about 894 square feet of land and shown as "Permanent (crossing) Easement" on the plan recorded with Deed from Boston and Maine Corporation to the Grantor, dated February 10, 1967, at said Registry in Book 5452, Page 111, subject to the restrictions, reservations and agreements contained in said Deed. Executed as a sealed instrument this Z3 day of May,2 {� •r Erik K Smith,Trustee COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Essex,SS - On this day of May, 2006,before me, the undersigned notary public,personally appeared Erik K. Smith,Trustee as aforesaid,proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was currently valid Massachusetts driver's license issued by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles, to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding document,and acknowledged to me that he signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. Notary Public My commission expires: )2--17- (0 - F:URW\4190_05-0807deed to LLC.doc ": -= : CARAS'--"X SiALEt•1 CommoyynwealOafNassachusatts CES �� Lt/ MOocemberci7 2010 e 05/24/06 10:58AM 01 000000 #3680 FEE ;_ :J975.84 -- 84 CASH X975_ i i HISTORIC HIGH 1 \ D _ WATER LINE 1 � —\ \ INLAID CONCRETE EXIST. NEW GRANITE CURB AND CONCRETE \ \ i SB/DH CROSSWALK AND CURB CUT SIDEWALK AT EXIST. i — — / ADA RAMPS AT CURB CUT (HLD LINE) MAIN ENTRACE �� 25 WIDE — • S.E.S.D. SEWER O V / � .� EASEMENT STOP SIGN 1 / MAP 16 LOT 377 SB/DH \ \ 1 HISTORIC HIGH I v� 50' l AND STOP / N/F FND & HLD \ I MAP 16 LOT 238 WATER LINE 1`� � ` BAR �j HARMONY GROVE CORP. N/F \ N p,RMO vJPY �6 J '` �/ I \ 1. I 50 GROVE STREET REAL EST, LLC \ , Pvg�1C ®.�r j 1 r x: �� \ \` I LAND COURT PLAN 33813A -�7�' • _ ` / — — NORhH RIVER CANAL — TIDAL I �AG��O 25' WIDE WOOD & METAL / BRIDGT W/ 8" PIPE S.E.S.D. SEWER gP / / DECK= EL. 9.2t \ \ I S EASEMENT / ' ,/ PROPOSED — / VEHICLE i 1 \ I — — — / BRIDGE U 1 m HISTORIC HIGH gt7 EXISTING 1 Q HI WAOTER LINE = F- = F- WATER LINE 0 = F- = 1 / / U W 10 W BRIDGE U W 10 Lu `J EXIST W ABUTMENTS ~ W I W _ � 0 2 cn RAILROAD N I — — — • \ Q = Q = PROPOSED MAP 16 LOT 378 - . - _ - • - _ - _\\�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INLAID CONCRETE 1 N/F C CROSSING i- — =1- — _ — — — — — -�- Z • — — —\_ — T. . . . . . . . . . . . — . . . . . . - - - - - - — — — — — — — — — CROSSWALKS & \ EXISTING LOADING —10 HARMONY GROVE CORP. EASEMENT STOP SIGN I I r AUTHORITY DOCK TO REMAIN ADA RAMP AT rii ; iiirririirrit..... _ !h _ � _ , ---;- f :,: : . 4f frrrr-r�i7-rf.}... }f�H�jlf 4 AND STOP BAY iir.tt..l.irri ;.R, t_L.; i ; irr; irk rrkrni i :riiit..�...t...wtrriiiii;_ t . 1aliti � i..t...irii ; iirir Q Q BAR I I l l l l l r l I I ! I I L_I , i! I I !I j i:;i!,! ;;; : .._t_:; i 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,_.. 1 !:. 1 ; r; r r r r,r _}11}._4..1-f-4-I-H-11 H !k 11111-111111-T-11 -�-�,4 f-1-1 1 1 1 1-1-4 f H-f-H-�-4+f-4 111 . . . . . ; . : ; ; : f-. .,----- -----'-- : r r r r ; r r r...... 1111.._ ... , r r r r ' \ TRANSPORTATION R.R. TRA S E t�t�ta-.t. t...U.�ttl.} -- i-r r;, 1 } f4mm,�rnn7 f _iiia; isrir �i; iriiirrirt..__..i ; iriiiirr... t..i, i,rii i r 1 4 , . ,:. : : : :;:. ; :;: .. kff- rff44H4I4f 1m�mnrr PROPOSED r �t.�� d :: : r r r ; i i r...t_r :: i^T—_r' 111:1 , , : r; : .t.�. ; : , : r r k i.}..f...}_f. W f 1 F4 f-H4+ m�: 4+4+H 4 r-r r 4 f 44+ r�n +4 f-: ; 1 r 1 n rrrr R r r� � -r H : ; r . . . .. . . :-}.,�: ... . . , ... : . :t�:-,-•� ::; .---;'. 1111 . , . , ;-n-T-nrT-T--r - - - - - HSN+++4��f I —1 TRr .41s�kttl4�t}+fitit�rH'44 li. 4 ; att .. wt — DU IK 37- R ' t f-4-FW-4-4 .�r ,, ;,: 4: ,o - - - - - - CURBING } ,1111. t t h 1 rrrt MPSTER 2 PROP BIKE GRANITE TSS � r 144 4 U t�+4 4{fi 1 `N _ 4— _ — — — — — AREA 1 �► RACK 59.1' —+ i SSACHUSE��,, �' }��+��,` ST SIGN & 1 _ BIT. CONC. PATH _ _ _ _ R Vl (TENANT PARKING) "► 1 �M A4'�}�}� 2 .0' , STOP AR — — — I ASL ,(TO REMAIN VII \ W 1 EXISTING AS COMMERCIAL �o STORAGE SPACE) �7 ,44k1y- ITE � -� BULK TRASH I "'� =f \ = BLOCK RET I ~--_ AREA 6® EY.ISTiPJG , STORAGE AREA \ WALL To 1 OFFICE 4 REPLACE WITHIN FENCED I ENCLOSURE NDIC I _ EL / I r SIDEWALKS ® , _ _ BIT. C 9.6 f 1 A10R BI ILDINu -0 / 16 RAMP _ T 7 ALONG � (T C' pAT H RIVER GROVE ST. I-1 � illlll.11lll H _ � � _ I I \ \ -I. O�N�C GRANIT, f FRONTAGE W/ \ e PROPOS B DIN #1 ® — T/Q E gL� CONCRETE I �I— i 7,rP. � _ W/ AR U ER _ . WALLET'----.. FENC ENCLR ED OW _ TR H & ECYCLL G P 1 _ GRAN PROPOSED EL, S.6 f AN/TE PEDESTRIAN —1111 C\1 5 = STORAGE AREA ED 40.0 �— E PR OSED `{. UI gL0 _ BUILDING g ERA CO RETE �► W GA ING �c�c�_ � � CI( BRIDGE _ 8 I TYP 2 S EWAL / AGE UN D #2 ! _ BIT O WALL TO 9/10/12 HATCH RES. USE; ADJUST RES. 1 14 1 PER UILDI ) Tom) t ` —U ITS R 1 � . SNC PATH W EL 9 — = = BOUNDARY ALONG BLDG 2 & 3 bP \ — _ _ DRIVEWAY. UPDATE / TY HI RI IG # 0 PR RAED CROSSWAL � .. ,: _: :.L,. ,:;. ..:..: ...: . ..: �K ° ° ::1:111 ., .,.. .....< .. ,, ......v- •.; .::,., :.. , _.,:.,.;:- _ ,. ( P 2 HIST C H ` 1 IKE RA>✓K _ TABLE 1111.... /� (TYP F 2 122 7 � — 6/20/12 ADD MATCH LINES REVISE 6 PE BUILDI G) _ � GROVE ST. LAYOUT. UPGRADE � (TYP U.N.O. 1 .• PE UILDI ) AT LIN R" ` ` / p opo SIDEWALKS & CROSSWALKS. . ° W ED UILD _ _ �1 ADD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. STON I '. I ONCR � GA SHIFT GROVE ST. ENTRANCE. .. ;111::: 1<.. ,�. E T. WALL I �. .. .:,.: ,11 11,. , I SIDE LK (4 GE// VD I 1 WIDEN VEHICLE BRIDGE. MAP 16 LOT 217 & I (T _U VD TS) ISTO C H ADD BIKE RACKS. I N/F - V C G►� '� TR INE •�. SARKES � I #" 1 1 N ` N Na. Date Description 1 L 1111,.. L ; . , •' ,...; ,n� 1111 # / �, = Revisions - - - MAP 16 LOT 218 BPD DISTRICT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A .........• .•... .. / _D IST L — - - - - - - - - - — - - 'SIL VER FLO ES R2 DISTRICT I 16. PUBLIC WAY 1 _ — —/ = '♦ - - - - - - -r— 474' - - - - — 1:111•. • 1 IN D CONCRETE MAFI 16 LOT MAPS 1j CRO WALK & ADR RAMP,S� ADA- O " jf 122E ,..54ON 225, ' MAP 16 ,, SHED �fl I A AIN ENTRANCES I I I / ,i / OT 227 SHEDO sroP IGN s� '.. MAP 16 LOT 76 may' MAP 16 LOT CNLEY TUC ER N/F 1 (� N/IF #2 ' I 223 I I I 32 , LAWSON - - - - - - AN STOP {, , ROE 9�y g=R7 G -i FLORES �� MAP 16 N/F I I # I WALL 1 !� CIVIL L; LOT 222MAP 16 A&N REAL 1 I ' ��--- I :?, #3� ESTATE MAP 16 LOT 230 I ALL 6686 KOHLOFER I DEMEULE MAP 16 LOT 232 #2 OT 220 Y N/F TRUST I' I �� N/F � U N/F O r� I IMAP 16 " N/F I BIT. CSC. PARKING 11 �> BLe4NDEN 1 m Q Q LOT 231 I MYERS I , I MAP 16 FENCE/PROPOS I I I N/F 20 I� MAP 16 E LON F35 / #L8 z 1 I ROSS # -� MAP 16 / I I ' #24 1 PAR ING II MAP 16 LOT �6 LOT 234 ;LOT 380 PATTISON #40 #38 j #3r ®IT. #30 MAP 16 LOT 229 I (8f SP�CES) 233 # N/F PATTISON CONC. N/F #1 CSWIGGIN F - - BASH SPERIDAKOS - - _ _( _ ■ ■ GRANITE cuR6 1 BEA VER S TREE T i POST ! GnIrrin — I FND t Engineering GRAM1— 1 (PUBLIC WAY N 30' WIDE) 1 Grou , LLC I — - - — — - - - - - - I - - - - I P I I 1 I P.O Box 7061 100 Cummings Center, Suite 224G 1 Beverly, MA 01915 NOTES: 1 ' Tel: ,978-927-5111 W 1) REFER TO SHEET N-1 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND LEGEND. I I C Fax:, 978-927-5103 L ZONING CHART REQUIRED = RESIDENTIAL SPACE PER PUD PROVIDED (147,211 SF) MRM PROJECT MIN. LOT AREA5 60,000 SF 296,659 SF MANAGEMENT, LLC N MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 100' 1 161 .37' i N MIN. LOT WIDTH -- 164.1 SALEM , MA MAX. LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS -- 14.5% MAX. RESIDENTIAL SPACE 50% 49.6% I MIN. FRONT YARD DEPTH -- 59.1 ' MIN. SIDE YARD DEPTH -- 47.6' MIN. REAR YARD DEPTH -- 40.0' OVERALL 0 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT FEET 50' 44.15' MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES 4 4 SITE LAYOUT a MIN. PARKING 1 .5 SP UNIT 212 2154 PLAN FOOTNOTES: 1 ) REF. SECTION 7.3.4.2 FOR MIN. FRONTAGE REQUIRMENT; R2 LISTED. 2) LOT WIDTH MEASURED AT THE REAR OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD Fn GRAPHIC SCALE Scc e: 1„=40, SETBACK FOR R2 ZONING DISTRICT. 3 3) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OCCURS ALONG FRONT OF BUILDING 3. 40 0 4 80 160 > SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BY BEAUDS ART, INC. .. .- . . ,, _ ,lob No.: 700 9 4) 215 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SIITE C- 3 CIO (1 .5 SP/UNIT). 22 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE ( IN FEET ) le Nam : p/p/s/h-b BUILDING. 1 inch = ft. 1= Nit: 12/20/11 U N 2 a a i