The URL can be used to link to this page

MARLBOROUGH RD - PLANNING (5) Marlborough Road Traffic Improvements 1 NOTICE OF MEPA SITE VISIT EOEA No. 12794 Marlborough Road Improvement Project, Iy Salem, MA PROJECT DESCRIPTION - The Massachusetts Highway Department proposes to construct transportation improvements to Marlborough Rd. in Salem including: roadway resurfacing, roadway widening to include standard (12.3 ft) travel lane width, right shoulder(4.1 ft), wheel chair ramps, and concrete sidewalks (6.6 ft), and related stormwater drainage modifications. A portion of this project will be located within the 200-foot Riverfront Buffer associated with Strongwater Brook. A MEPA SITE VISIT IS SCHEDULED FOR- MondakJune 3.0 2:00 pm.The site visit meeting will be held at the Salem Public Library's Great Study Room (rear of Reference Section)370 Essex Street. DIRECTIONS - From the south Take Route 128 south to Route 114 east towards Salem Interstate 93 south through Boston to exit Take exit number 25 Route 114 East towards PEABODY/SALEM. Tum RIGHT onto ESSEX ST("Witch House"on right) Library is 2 blocks on the right(red brick building) parking on street. FOR PROJECT INFORMATION - FORMATIO Contact: Mathew DeSorbo Massachusetts Highway Department at 617 973-7882. FOR MEPA QUESTIONS/COMMENTS- Contact: Nicholas Zavolas at 617 626-1030. MEPA COMMENTS ARE DUE ON OR BEFORE 6/14/2002 , ., a. 1 SS a55 T� MIGHWArh►r 29'a2 ®°LUZ .3 4 E : husetts Highway Department Plaza,Boston,MA 02116-3973 P8 METE a MA 1107831PosTAC' . ; IIL::�:JILLJ::/�:IIL::::ILI —5c,lew- Pl ,wnlAS goarc) c/o Salem Town Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA. 01970 Cs Hii.' iii i , i. 1 •" Qi^}}? '/.� ..te':�:•�':e i. °.. :• eu ;: is : :i;:i;•:i � b Mo�rlla�n�l�, I4 72 t CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR .„... SALEM, MA 01970 MMB TEL. (978) 745-9595 EXT. 311 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. FAX (978) 740-0404 MAYOR JOSEPH P. WALSH ACTING DIRECTOR AND CITY PLANNER March 22, 2002 Mark Terry 108 Marlborough Road Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Terry: Enclosed please find the two forms requiring your signature concerning the land needed for the -,-4karl borough Road construction project. In addition, you will find a copy of the revised plans for the section of the roadway adjacent to your properties. As you will see, the plans show the construction of the wall in the location that you requested during our last site visit. i Please sign the two forms and return the originals to: Bob Gates Department of Public Works 120 Washington Street, 4`h Floor Salem, MA 01970 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Gates at (978) 745-9595, extension 321. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, P ph P. Walsh Director WE THE UNDERSIGNED AGREE TO DONATE THE LAND LISTED BELOW FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MARLBOROUGH ROAD. MARK J. & MARYANN J.TERRY A parcel of land supposed to be owned by Mark J. and Maryann J. Terry located on the easterly layout line of Marlborough Road bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a. point on said layout line at the southwesterly comer of the parcel hereinafter described; Thence northeasterly along said layout on a curve to the right of radius 270.00 feet (82.296 meters) a distance of 80.32 feet(24.483 meters); Thence continuing along said layout line N190-29'-59"E and 39.08 feet(11.911 meters); Thence southwesterly on a curve to the left of radius 329.33 feet (100.38 meters) a distance of 82.24 feet (25.371 meters); Thence N85°-16'-06" W a distance of 6.99 feet (2.130 meters) to a point; Thence southwesterly along a curve to the left of radius 322.34 feet (98.250 meters) a distance of 119.98 feet (36.569 meters) to a point on the northerly sideline of land now or formerly of John J. and Gloria R. Piotrowski; Thence along said sideline S81°-02'-55" W and 19.76 feet (6.023 meters) to the point of beginning. Said parcel contains approximately 2,990 square feet(277.609 square meters). Signed: Date: Address: Witness: CITY OF SALEM — RIGHT OF ENTRY - WITHOUT PREJUDICE - - Owner(s) of Record: 1` &,rK ma-&Z Q.Nn1 3• TLgcK e Address: /off M�2LF�oRouG}{ ocn Stations: -ro "1+73 R1' Parcel (s) : Project: r�q��szjo2auG� 1�oAn i�F�or.�sT�uc-l��n� Permission is hereby given to the above municipality and the MA Highway Department or its duly authorized agents to enter upon my property in connection with the reconstruction of a roadway, on the above named project. Plans for this project are located in the Municipal offices. The purpose of this Right of Entry is to allow for—changes and to carry out the work, on my property, as outlined below: j; Er Pa.1/e Z• G2dU� Loo.M k Se-f,- MLTeP, itiI PAiZT oFr MY -F1LoPt:C•T-y� �j�+-11 117 F�'OFbS RETAoNit'Iff W G1.L.L THIS ENTRY TO BE MADE WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO MY RIGHTS IN SETTLEMENT OF ANY CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES THAT MAY HEREAFTER APPEAR. Granted by: Owner(s) or Authorized Representative Date Recommended by: City / Town Official - Title Date UNAINAVL & UIILIIILS I-IVVY. UUANU IYf L 5S UNAU1rvU SALLM SEE SHEET NO. STA. 8+60.5 Lt. TO STA. 8+75.6 Lt. SEE SHEET NO. MARLBOROUGH ROAD -� srnlc fm.No pgoa Na m NlsNOT miµ YEN0. SNFET$ MA 2001 103 PROTECT FILE No. 601321 GENERAL PLAN FDRAINAGE pUTLET l STA. 8+62t LEFT PUSHING WARNING BEACON TYPE D PROP. SERVICE CONNECTION & 24m - 75 mm CONDUIT c% PROP.100 mm MODIFIED .�/ LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. 2 m CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK �F ,... ... . :a.-(R&S) PROP.100mm MODIFIED .t CITY PROP.100 mm AGED LOAM BORROW AND SEED -• 1 -.-- PINE BARK MULCH PROP. SIT. —_ PROP. 4,9 m CEMENT L V � _ OF \ CONC Y CONC DRIVEWAY r S-M US OF_ — _". PROP BIT PROP BIT. CONC. DRIVEWAY - —REPOSED \ PROP. DRI m CE V CONC. DRIVEWAY MR CONC. DRIVEWAY , iR&S GUARD RAIL 9801 , — — __ ._._` ..P CEMENT PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT S _ S Op CONC. DRIVEWAY fir, -PROP COLD PLANE ANS OVERLAY ,�^ \ f '., 1. cam' ROP BOX /-/�-_ .- �Cq \ PROP.100 mm MODIFIED ` - �✓ WIDENING =' pAD �— PROP SAW CUT p"'p LOAM BORROW AND SEED /'/ T^ feN R \ yy T PROP. GRANITE CURB i / • / MPR�6/p0O _ - hRLBOROUC 1 @ - �b; CURB TYPEVB TYPE VB PROP. 2 m CEMENT \ POp i/'� ICY `�' _ - TEMI CONC. SIDEWALK tip 915: 14 pOH`/ PROP GRANITE CURB TYPE VB R&$ GUARD RAIL y ` va\0PROP CEM TED STONE MASONRY W :. -k/R&S EDGING R-3 m „DETAIL SHT NO.PROP 100 MODIFIED S f0 "- C, ,` \\S�` O ppN_Np F 000 S •� - LOAM BORROW AND SEED' - _ u PROP BIT OqP 1 ,11 j �s5 N9. 909 PROP FULL DEPTH RECONSTR - -- �� CONC DRIVEWAY .r C 0 T PROP. 2 m CEMENT CONC SIDEWALK ON x W STA 8+45+/•- TO STA 9+25 +/ y PROP. CEMENT CONC. WHEELCHAIR 4 IRAMP nr++ L, �\o4`f o �69't'OO CGT \ Capp 6 y000 ,,y R¢3 CLLT sly ,•,yf, �' \ f�67p\� p1.,11 p� _ �.• q,,�, !/I'/S'S36j k/y,TiNPROP. 9.1 m CEMENYv� Soo \ pp0 S_ Tq pj CONC. DRIVEWAY Oq \ J C O PROP. 2 m CEMENT `� S )\\x /• �. P (r -.p;4iej ppf' CONC. SIDEWALK \ ` 000 \ on Soo PROP: GRANITE CURB NC f,0 \ r PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED 4�p \ \ v m 1400 TYPE VB .y Ci,1,0 LOAM BORROW AND SEED - ` ` of f ( LIMIT OF x .;.VISTA ' PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED LOAM BORROW AND SEED, STA. 03-9.6.200 r �% \\ PROP.GRAM` PROP. 2 m CEMENT CONC SIDEWALK CURB TYPEE VV B S PROP. 1.6 m BIT. CONC. WALK SURFACE \ PROP. CEMENTED STONE MASONRY PROP. 100 mm MODIFIEDWALL(SEE DETAIL SHT NO. ) LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. BIT CONC WALK SURFACE PROP. CEMENT CONIC. PROP.100 mm AGED '. WHEELCHAIR RAMP PINE BARK MULCH SC IN METERS MAR 0 8 10 2002 0 5 10 15 20 25 F(1R PROFII F CFF CHFFT DRAINAGE & UTILITIES HWY. GUAHU IYHE SS GNAUINU bALLM MARLBOROUGH ROAD SEE SHEET NO. NONE SEE SHEET NO. MA i-0-01 103 PROJECT FILE No. 501321 GENERAL PLAN 1— Full- j PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP. 14 m CEMENT p m PROP, 100 mm MODIFIED LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED CONC. DRIVEWAY LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. 81T CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP. SIT. PROP. CEMENT CONC. WALK CONC. PROP. BRICK WALK E ON Y PROP 100 mm AGED C C. 0 1 RIVEWAY PROP 4.9 CEMENT PROP. 2 m CEMENT PROP. 4.9 CEMENT CONCRETE] PINE MULCH PROP. BIT. CONC. WALK CONC. DRIVEWAY CONC. SIDEWALK URrvEwAY(LOCATION TO BE K DETERMINED IN FIELD) 2 C PROP. BIT CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP.P CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK PROP 100 �m MODIFIED LK REMOVE 1. q 9 LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP GRANITE CURB TYPE V13 PROPOSED PROPGRANITTEN LOG E OTT;, SLOP URB TYPE V8 LOP C11 104rw LINE APRIL NT E 1-1 10 Tp TE CURB TYPE VB PROP, 95 �m BIT. CONC. PAVEMENT TYPE I —PROP ROP. GRANITE +52625-- CO P AW UT — __+ N2 .,, . ---, M, +24.263 P'(T Rss35 DOO M L=23—17d/N�' 12 OVERLAY PROP S 5000 m PR COLD PLANE AND OVERLAY 5.000 m MARLBOROUGH PROP. 643 PROP 5.OoO mJF3-002"772-104457 ROAD +95 0 E 5.000 PROP- MARLBOROUGH RE). S� m R"S'5G115.00o - .+48.169 E.' E. r -- 6 7 BIT CONC. PAVEMENT TYPE I-, Qr Z3 010 5.1 Ls 5.ODO I'd r� ------- + OF ROP CE (R&R) pNT L C)NC. W� Al, I E IEND CURB PROP. 100 mm MODIR D J 6< > ry s, S o s., LIMIT OF WORK LOAM BORROW AND tED PROP. BIT. CONIC. DRTV AY --- LINE OF TEMP EASEMENT PROP. GRANITE ,,-SCENIC AVENUE -f2.. 7 �n > STA. 0+20.000 PROP. 12 � CEMENT-/ CURB TYPE VS OUTLOOK AVENUE 1.913 m F PROP. CEMENT CONC. �SIDEWALK E L I Nllt!��vl�lt STA. Qt-1 5.000 4': 1 PROP. GRANITE CUR PE VB PROP. 100 mm AGED CONC. SIDEWALK -q 1 m CEMENT T I B E OR PINE BARK MULCH PROPA.6 L /B ,mN PR CEMENT LLJ CONC SIDEWALK PROP. CEMENT PROP. GRANITE CURB TYPE > r i CONC. SIDEWALK CONIC. SIDEWALK PROP. CEMENTED STONE MASONRY END PROP LO ALT . • CEMENT WALL(SEE DETAIL SHT. NO. PROP. 4.9 m CEM PROP PROP. 2 In CEMENT 2 m CEMENT PROP. C INC. CONC. DRIVEWAY lllkl� CONC. SIDEWALK PROP. 100 �m MODIFIED WHEELCHAIR CONC. SIDEWALK J N 'It PROP. CEMENT CO PROP. CEMENT CONC. i PROP CEMENT CONC. LOAM BORROW AND bLLU PROP. 100 �m MODIFIED NC. WHEELCHAIR RAMP 1 1 i Lj 1 j WHEELCHAIR RAMP PROP. 2 m CEMENT I LOAM BORROW AND SEED WHEELCHAIR RAMP ; 4 CONC. SIDEWALK t I > LLJ PROP.BlOoRoRmm mooinED LOAM OW AND SEED PROPOSED CITY LOCATION LINE TOP OF PROP SLOPE U) — ------------------ ------------ 0 r --------- .. ..... iL 0 ------ NOTE I LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ONlot I PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE I DETERMINED IN THE FIELD-By THE ENGINEER. SCALE IN METERS 10 is 20 25 FOR PROFILE SEE SHEET ALCM MARLBOROUGH RD. srxrc rcn.-ono+xo. i 1veer rorK rcrn xa. s�acrs 30.71 120011 1103 PROJECT FILE NO. 601321 30.09 Top Of Concrete cap MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 30.56 29.61 29.94 Top Of Wall 29.61 Proposed Location Line 28'46 Existing Ground At Back Of Wall � 9.750 m 28.31 Proposed Grade At Face Of Wall 27.46 30 MP.. 40 mm, 335 kg 500 L Elev. 27.33 Cement Concrete L-450 mm - - mm Elev. 26.83 27'31 150 mm -f lll-75 mm Existing Ground Elev. 26.33 VARIABLE WIDTH T Elev. 25.83 500 mm 75 mm� -r 8.145 m -Grovel Back (ill Bottom Of Footing 300 mm ` 5.000 m Sidewalk ra 20 m Strip Varies Overlap At Step(Typ.) > 700 mm -_ -100 mm Weep Hole ® 4 m C. To C. 500 mm v 1.55 m 600 mm MARLBOROUGH ROAD @ BASE=22 300 mm `300 mm 8+20 +26.81 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80 +90 9 +10 +20 +30 300 mm 25 MPo, 40 mm, 310 kg Cement Concrete CEMENTED STONE MASONRY WALL ELEVATION CEMENTED STONE MASONRY WALL - SECTION Scale In Meters: Hor. 1:250 SCALE 1:50 Vert. 1:50 CEMENTED STONE MASONRY WALL STA.8+26.8 RT. - STA.9+88.2 RT. 28.36 28.36 Top Of Concrete Cop 27.38 28.21 28.21 27.23 26.91 rL 26.72 300 mm 2642 26.31 26.76 2 .16 Proposed LocationLine I Proposed Grade At Face Of Wall 26.02 Existing Ground 7.620 m 300 mm 300 mm L Elev. 25.00 ------ Sd0wak 5 .000 m 500 mm Elev. 24.50 30 Mac. 40 mm, 335 kg Varies Cement Concrete (ITEM 901) I Varies Bottom Of Footing 800 600 mm & Varies MARLBOROUGH ROAD @ BASE=22 9+31.407 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80 +88.189 LOW CONCRETE RETAINING WALL CEMENTED STONE MASONRY WALL ELEVATION STA.14+11.7 LT. - STA.14+31.3 LT. SCALE 1:50 Scale In Meters: Hor. 1:250 Vert. 1:50 MAR 0 8 2002 ------- ..___-.__ rt�ry ,. i ..__.. _.. � MARLBOROUGH ROAD ', ',. sr�re ten.�raa.ra. nsri4 seer rotw< MA 2001 103 28 -_..--.. _ ----.._ '--'------------------- ----------+. -------'--'-- '------------- — ,.------ '—'-'---- ---- ''.---- --------CR--------------: 28 SS SECTIONS � I ' -- - - ----- 24 -- J .. .-._-------- � .. _i- .. ___ -_.__.. -.... _:._._ _—__ -� __ ___ __ _1_.... .. ___._.-... _ .._ 1. .... _. :.. ._..._-- -_______ ____ ___ __--------- -16 __ ___-16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 9+76.62 ... ---"'---. --- _--_.-_. _,._ROW. _.-__-.__ ...._-._.-_ ___.�-._.- ---_-. ___ _.--'---._. ---------_.._-_.__ ---------.___.. _.....___. ROW.., .- 28 : ..._.... .-.__._- ..._______ _— _...-___.:_____-_ _ ------ ----. __----------- .___.-_.. ... . __ - _ _- - —_-__ _____.._. i 28 I ' n ' o O1 1 b 16 1 N 24 •EMBANK 0.1 y�0 SO METERS 'EARTH EXCAV. 14.837 _ SO. METERS -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 9+60 .-.-..-.-._ _______._. ._.--R_OW..____-.__.-.- ---___-_- ___.-__..--_ --_ - _. -.-____.. _-___. . .._-...____ PR----- ------------ 28 W_ 28 __.___- _..-._.- -_!,... .------- .........-._._. _r__- --_ __._. _.._.-..__ _.. ...-_.._-__ ___.--__ -_-_ __ __ - .. .___.._._ .-_-.-._-._. !_______ __ -...._-....-_-1- --------- _-__.-.-._ .y 28 I EMBANK 0.250 _ SO. METERS EARTH EXCAV. — SO. METERS 24 13.085 MARQ8 -- --- SCALE 1 : 50 -16 12 -6 4 0 4 8 12 MARLBOROUGH ROAD SLE fID.ND PRW N0. i15U1 91F£T TANTK 1fM XO. 9�EEfi MA 2001 0} PROJECT FILE NO. 601321 CROSS SECTIONS 28. ROW .-_--_-- ROW 28 Lri ''.. EARTH EXCAV 3.524 SO. METERS 2424 6 -12 .-_ _fig ,4 0 4 _ -- 8 12 16 10+00 ROW 28 ', 28 N 24 24 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 9+84.79 ROW ROW 28 ' 28 v I r vi I I 24. : 24 j MAR 0 8 2002 EARTH EXCAV. 13.265 SO. METERS I -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 9+80 SCALE 1 : 50 f CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PATRICK REFFETT ONE SALEM GREEN City Planner ` ` 01970 (978)745-9595 EM.311 Fax(978)740-0404 June 13,2000 Ugo DiBiase DiBiase Salem Realty Trust 10 Lookout Terrace Lynnfield, MA 01940 RE: Request to Rezone Approximately 160 acres of Land on Marlborough Road from the R-1 Zoning District to the R-3 Zoning District Dear Mr. DiBiase: The City of Salem is in receipt of your request to rezone approximately 160 acres of land on Marlborough Road from the R-1 Zoning District to the R-3 Zoning District. The request only includes a brief narrative describing the land and its location. In order to rezone property, particularly of the magnitude envisioned in your request, many issues must be extensively addressed. The proposed development must be evaluated with respect to its impact upon traffic, utilities, fire,police, schools, emergency services, and other elements of the City's infrastructure. Further, the development must create and propose a thorough plan by which the development will add,rather than deplete, each of these public systems. At this very preliminary stage,we have many questions which will grow as we know more about your proposal. Presently,the following is a list of the possible questions the City has regarding your request: • Has a new roadway network been conceptually designed to serve the development so as to limit the impact on surrounding roadways. What is the capacity and existing levels of service of the existing roadways pertaining to traffic? What improvements, if any, will be required to alleviate the negative impact of the increase in traffic generated from the site? • What is the capacity of the sewer, water and drainage in the area? What utility mains are performing at capacity? What are the conditions of these systems and what repairs are needed? What will be the level of demand created by your project which will be imposed upon these systems? What improvements are needed to accept your development's demand? r Will the proposed increase in utility usage overload the City's system as a whole? • How many additional school children will the proposed increase in density account for? Can the City's existing school system handle the additional school children? • What is the effect on emergency services, such as police, fire and rescue? Does the City have adequate services to accommodate the additional density and newly developed land area? • The parcel proposed for rezoning is adjacent to land owned by you in Peabody. Will the proposed project include development in both Peabody and Salem as one project? How will the issues of emergency services, utilities, schools,plowing and maintenance of roadways be accommodated across municipal boundaries. • What level of environmental evaluation has taken place on the parcel and how much is considered buildable? • Have you established a timing or phasing plan which sequences the order of development upon the parcel? The Salem Planning Department suggests that a concept plan and research be incorporated into your request for rezoning so that both the Planning Board and the City Council can review your request in the most expedient and thorough manner. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at (978) 745-9595, extension 311, if you would like to discuss the issues addressed in this letter or your request. Sincerely, Patrick Reffett City Planner cc: Mayor Stanley J. Usovicz Salem City Council Members Salem Planning Board Members Stanley Bornstein, Salem City Engineer Peter Torrigian, Peabody Mayor Judy Otto, Peabody Planning Director Marlborough Road Reconstruction [I �! � +i t � • � Gam' r [ , t � 1 �: til �'•'' \ � 1 1 �I [ � • � �!• t,� � �1�� rim • � II � i MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT District Four Construction Division PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE SALEM Roadway Reconstruction and Related Work On Marlborough Road CONTRACT # 33279 August 12, 2003 10:00 AM-Arlington, MA e District Four (4) Construction District Highway Director Stephen T. O'Donnell 519 Appleton Street Arlington, MA 02476 TeL (781) 641-8300 FAX(781) 646-5115 Acting District Construction Engineer Joe D'Angelo TeL (781) 641-8409 Fax (781) 646-2813 Assistant Dist Construction Engineer Rich Hogan (781) 641-8417 Area Supervisor Ted Gibson (9 78) 95-5403 g�• t�3�t Resident Engineer Sue Cranney (9 78) 39 fl- District Utilities & Agreements Specialist Anthony Ferolito (781) 641-8415 Prime Contractor J. Tropeano, Inc. 1780 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 (978) 689-2745 Bid Price= $1,81746 7.00 EEO Compliance Officer Carmine Federico 781 641-8445 Minority/Women Business Enterprise Don Martin Corporation. N E Traffic Control 475 School Street Unit#6 101 State Road Marshfield, MA 02050 Plymouth, MA 02360 781834-0071 (508) 746-7160 Completion Date: October 16, 2004 I. Opening Introduction: The Minority Employee Percentage Rate to be applied to this job will be not less than 5%. H. Field Office: III. All correspondence relating to this project should be addressed as follows: Stephen T. O'Donnell District Highway Director Massachusetts Highway Department 519 Appleton Street Arlington, MA 02476 Attn: Joe D'Angelo Acting District Construction Engineer. and indicate the Contract #33279 on all correspondence IV. Before work starts, we need: a. Proposed Work Schedule (Bar Chart) b. Approved Manning.Table c. Emergency Contact Person(s) Numbers (phone,cellfax,etc.) d. All Sub-Contractors need approval before they start work e. Source of Materials f. Letter to the District Highway Director listing personnel authorized to sign pay estimates g. Approval by the Engineer of submitted schedules and methods operations h. Name and Address of Liability Insurance Company Salem Marlborough Road Construction Issues August 12, 2003 MassHighway Project # 601321 • Contacts o MHD o Contractor o City o Engineer • Construction Schedule o Ground Breaking Ceremony o Meeting with Neighborhood o Actual Start o Traffic shift updates o Weekly Site Meetings • ADA • Shop Drawings o Retaining wall, Traffic signals, Storm drainage items • Traffic Management o Work only from 9 AM to 3:30 PM o Message Boards NOW, alert traffic to upcoming construction • Remove and stack items o City to ID location E A H T M =J T E C X k\workV)338\pro3lwrotm<tion\kick of sl.es 8.12 03 d.0 A tgCO IN ERNAVONAL LTO.COMPANY MARLBOROUGH ROAD SALEM ROAD CONSTRUCTION BEGINS SEPTEMBER 2003 SEEK ALTERNATE ROUTES .l t ix � ti � � �•i311 � F� 'I• ♦�.' I a }x i 4k �.� .r•-, � } . ��< ��' ) #9 v•� �+ ser�—�._._'f'__ � �qQ f r �� 4.... ��v•'�°• � e�p} ti :,e �,IY`I I � � � ' I , ' / . � r l �., f�i•_. } 1.i~L` '�' �.._... ' f r ' s� �-.a�r� 1.� r ♦ �. r +t "".� y �-i � _ 'L7_�•?. tic �V '` � ye-q ° r. � } .� ego• }}t••�T: r�4' x l �1 • �' Y e - - ��►` as t° �• I ,�`� ,ti �_. �',� r- ay �,• .J#C ,J H N • • LOWELL TREMONT 114 . a S z ST T w U Mg7N ST GF,S� • \NPS�,�NG�ON oz 0F`�� ESS END OF PROJECT , • • STA. 15+14.305 MARLBOROUGH RD. N 918436.515 E 247149.180 107 ST. Q�00O� P OF OF BEGINNING OF PROJECT STA. 0+15.862 MARLBOROUGH RD. N 917088.334 N �\G�S E 247312.784 O C/n OF • C/)y OF SgCEM LYNN TOWNc F OF SA QO • • wgMPSCpn MASS /J'GH�AY Mitt Romney Kerry Healey Daniel A. Grabauskas John Cogliano /7 Governor Lt Governor Secretary Commissioner PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE DATE: August 12, 2003 PROJECT: Salem-Marlborough Road CONTRACT #: 33279 FEDERAL AID #: NFA COST ACCOUNT: P601 321 C11 RESIDENT ENGINEER: S. Cranney CONTRACTOR: J. Tropeano, Inc. NAME (PLEASEPRIN7) DEPTJORG. TEL. # (INCLUDE EXT.) G C', b5dvv *fz4 ,f St,> eew 6/ 7 - 839- 63 1, U - 8 1 - 9 41 / —')9 9s` \Sic,san cfe,?,7.7 e I -/motes F,vGiz 9re- 5f30- 960-,F 9-qB -745-%ws I s i OdPGr Cr o� , 4) 78 9 -!�_ I\1I oe- Py'6 ?78 -371 - 4 33 '? /Coat.¢ F XCi1R C,71 of S Le n 7 - ?.jV-0794 f S ,,, ? - q- 382 Massachusetts Highway Department•District 4.519 Appleton Street,Arlington, MA 02476•(781) 641-8300 ebb ��i�,�o�6 � P� `Ue�- 30 �`' ( ` � ' ��oZ � �� ` -� � � � � s � '�� yam` !� � � y� > � d �� k, Q � ��1�\c � �� . � �� Q� �� '�'�`�� _\� �� ,� � � � �� .� �� i �c�� CLERK OF THE WORKS ACCOUNT AS OF JUNE 30, 2003 BALANCE -18,282.80 INVOICES SENT TO DEVELOPERS 2,430.00 PYMTS RECEIVED ON FY 04 - LESS 6,660.00 OVER PAYMENT BY PUBLIC STORAGE -1,560.00 NEED TO TRANSFER TO CLERKS ACCT. 10,752.80 harbor plan balance — 9;9 Harbor Overlay District Balance$50,200.00 tOy' � 6+ �r �►� holo WkN Cly. Marlborough Road MHD J CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES n a Q 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 4TH FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 �GMM6lNN BRUCE D. THIBODEAU, P.E. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TEL: 978-745-9595 EXT. 321 MAYOR FAX: 978-745-0349 [AUGC19 1003 OMEP MUNIOTE/DEANNING VEL0 MENT TO: Stanley J. Usovicz, Jr., Mayor Kenneth Bonacci, Salem Disabilities Commission Captain Robert Callahan, Salem Police Department Jean Levesque, ADA Compliance Officer Denise McClure, DPCD Deputy Director William Merrill, Assistant DPW Director Thomas Philbin, Chief of Staff Leonard O'Leary, Ward Four Councillor Joseph Walsh, City Planner FROM: Bruce Thibodeau, City Engineer RE: Marlborough Road Distribution of 8/12/03 Minutes DATE: August 18, 2003 Enclosed please find the minutes of the pre-construction conference for Marlborough Road held on August 12, 2003. We did not receive a definitive schedule from the contractor, although it was anticipated that construction would begin in mid-September. I will be having a meeting with Mass Highway and the contractor on September 3`d in my office to discuss definitive schedules including groundbreaking. I will communicate to you the result of that meeting. M E M O Date: August 13,2003 To: Bruce Thibodeau _ Joe Nerden cc: J.Freudberg,B.McGrath,ET Files 37338 From: Nick Rubino Subject: Marlborough Road Salem—MHD Project#33279 Meeting with MHD—Construction Kickoff A meeting was held on August 12,2003 at MUD District 4. An attendee's list is attached. The following points were discussed: • Meeting opened by Ted Gibson of MHD. Sue Cranney-Resident Engineer for MHD. • Handout by MHD—Reviewed(attached). • "CHAMP"scheduling system to be used by MBD. • Scope of work read into record. Metric proj ect. 9AM—3:30PM workday. Read sequence of construction and process from specifications into record. • ADA regulations read into record. Ken Bonacci(card attached) asked to help MHD. Ken provided a handout to MHD. Ken is the secretary for the Salem Commission on Disabilities. Contractor(J.Tropeano,Inc.)has some concerns with certain ramps. Says waivers may be needed. MHD to discuss with contractor. Ken B. said he has not seen plans. • Discussion on the need for weekly meetings. MHD agreed. MHD will not meet with residents in general,only for specific impacts. • Construction issues and concerns should go to Resident Engineer. • 48-hour notice to city prior to setting hay bales requested by the City. • City contact is Bruce Thibodeau or Joe Nerden. E A R T H `/ T E C H A tyro mruugoau lro.cwAnwr \\Uuom l�\wok\733&\DOCSWulb oughRoadSdm 081203.4 Page 2 • Verizon asked about start date. Anticipate September 2003,2nd week. Will start at McGrath Park and work towards Highland. • One lane minimum for traffic. Flip flopping for drainage. Detours suggested by contractor will be submitted to City. • Bruce Thibodeau discussed traffic issues. - Message boards to be priced by contractor and sent to MHD.-Asked to keep these in project for duration. Start two weeks prior to construction. - Police explained that side streets are residential. Better to restrict traffic to residents only or Marlborough Road. - Need Peabody sign off on"Local Traffic Only". - Peabody,Rich Harcroft is the contact. - Tim Tanner: 978-689-2745 /Contractor: J.Tropeano, Inc. - Meering prior to groundbreaking-Wednesday, September 3, 2003 at LOAM at Salem. - October, Salem traffic is BAD! Halloween. • Shop drawing forms provided to contractor. - 3 full size sets needed; 2 more calc.books(both requested from Boston). To: Sue Cranney; 38 Abington Ave.; Peabody,MA 01960 • Pedestrian signal may need top of foundation elevations to check clearance. E R H T H T E C H A tq=WlFPN4vILYUL Ian CQ'A \\Uswm l\dau\wmk%37336\DOCSUIa it ughRoadSal�091203. o MASS H/GHWAY Mitt Romney Kerry Healey Daniel A. Grabauskas John Cogliano Governor it Governor Secretary Commissioner PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE DATE: August 12, 2003 PROJECT: Salem-Marlborough Road CONTRACT#: 33279 FEDERAL AID #: NFA COST ACCOUNT: P601321 C1 RESIDENT ENGINEER: S.Cranney CONTRACTOR: J. Tropeano, Inc. NAME(PLEASE PRINT) DEPTJORG. TEL. # (INCLUDE EXT:) c' C/ 650vv .4ILa-A S ervis 6/ 7 {339- 6 3 �= Nt -F t I - 9S pmwkea - 4( Lf� Susan C'Pan.oe �s FyGrt 9r&-580— /60.x 9-qB .74S. r� -7106 odova 778-37/ - 4 33'7 OPrrt �. ��/f2� Cry y Ur Ste 7 - rI`I`f- O'J4�I 9 ?g_ - 3a2 Massachusetts Highway Department•District 4.519 Appleton Street,Arlington, MA 02476•(781) 641-8300 �1) COMMISSION ON ' DISABILITIES Kenneth Bonacci Secretary Q731416@peoplepc,c0m _ ��Pte,• ,�,�10 � : . m . . %�odtorc; tGlac�irizet�i 020&->6>F ,o,.P,SU . Ahox 617) 727-0660 libice and M$ 1-800-F28-7.22 �aZ 617) 727-0665•. SIDEWALKICUR13 CUT COMPLAINT FORM PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD AND WILL BE . DISCLOSED UPON REQUEST. 1. list the name of streettintersection believed to be in violation of the.Rules and Regulations.- Please give EXACT street locations. (Use separate forms for each streetfrntersecdoin) 'Address. City/Town: 2. In order for the Board to take action on.the complaint, the following work must have been completed or in the process of being performed. Please check where appropriate: Sidewalks or curbs aid currently under construction, repair, o�reconstruction. utidewalks or.curbs have been repaired, reconstructed or constructed on: between June 10, 1975-August 31, 1996.Approximate date: after September 1, 1996. .3. Please check the following items which you believe are in violation: .Curb cuts are not provided where an accessible•route crosses a curb: Curb cut isnot provided at each comer of intersection, located within the•crosswalk and/or- the pedestrian path of travel. Curb cut is not perpendicular to the curb rb at street an crossings landin at the to . 9 clot does not.have.a level 9 . P At marked crossings, the bottom of the ramp run, exclusive of flared sides, is not contained with the marked crossing. Curb cuts or sidewalks are being constructed or reconstructed on one side of the street, and curb cuts are not provided on the opposite side of the street. Curb cuts are not provided at driveways intersecting sidewalks when the driveway has side curbs. Raised island in crossing is not cut through level with the street and/or does not have curb cuts at both sides and a level area at least 48 inches long between the curb cuts in the part of the island intersected by the crossings. Curb cuts are obstructed by parked vehicles.. Maximum slop.. exceeds 1:12.(8 3%). Transition from curb cut to walk, gutter, or street is greater than 1/2 inch high: Grading and drainage'are not designed to minimize water pooling," ice accumulation, or water flowing at the bottom of the curb cut " Minimum width of a curb cut is less than 36 inches, exclusive-of flared sides.. _ A landing at the top of the curb cut is not 48 inches in length.. The slope of said landing . exceeds 1:50(2%) in any direction. Sides of curb cuts are Iess.than 24 inches at the curb. Maximum flare'-slope exceeds 1:10• (10%). Curb cuts with.returned sides are provided and are not protected-by handrails, street furniture or landscaping. Cross-slope of sidewalk exceeds 1:50 (2%). Built=up curb cut is provided which projects into vehicular traffic lanes. Pedestrian streetaossing controls (if provided) Controls are not raised from or flush with their housings and/or are nota minimum of two inches in the smallest dimension. Force required to activate controls exceeds 5 ft-Ib. Controls are not Located as close as practicable to the curb cut serving the controlled crossing and/or do not permit operation from a Gear ground space. Ped. trianactuated controls are•not at maximum of 42 inches above sidewalk • -A stable and firm area, complying with Forward Reach or Side•Reach, is not provided at itw controls. - Where a parallel approach is provided, controls.are not within ten inches horizontally - of and/or are not centered on the clear ground space. Where a forward approach is provided,controls do not abut and/or are not centered on the clear ground space. 4. What was the most recent date you observe.the violation?: 5. Name and address of person/organization filing this complaint: TEL: (if organization is filing, please provide the Board with the name of a contact person) S. SIGNATURE: (form must be signed by an individual) T. Date: i MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT District Four Construction Division PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE SALEM Roadway Reconstruction and Related Work On Marlborough Road CONTRACT # 33279 August 12, 2003 10:00 AM—Arlington, MA District Four (4) Construction District Highway Director Stephen T. O'Donnell 519 Appleton Street Arlington, MA 02476 Tel. (781) 641-8300 FAX(781) 646-5115 Acting District Construction Engineer Joe D'Angelo Tel. (781) 641-8409 Fax(781) 646-2813 Assistant Dist Construction Engineer Rich Hogan (781) 641-8417 Area Supervisor Ted Gibson G 7 _f3 GI - 6394 Resident Engineer Sue Cranney Ce// 17 9 - 590 -964' (978) 774-1850 District Utilities&Agreements Specialist Anthony Ferolito (781) 641-8415 Prime Contractor J. Tropeano, Inc. 1780 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 (978) 689-2745 Bid Price= $1,817467.00 EEO Compliance Officer Carmine Federico 781641-8445 Minority/Women Business Enterprise Don Martin Corporation. N E Traffic Control 475 School Street Unit#6 101 State Road Marshfield, MA 02050 Plymouth, MA 02360 781834-0071 (508) 746-7160 Completion Date: October 16, 2004 I. Opening Introduction: The Minority Employee Percentage Rate to be applied to this job will be not less than 5%. H. Field Office: A10 7— III. III. All correspondence relating to this project should be addressed as follows: Stephen T. O'Donnell District Highway Director Massachusetts Highway Department 519 Appleton Street Arlington,MA 02476 Attn: Joe D'Angelo Acting District Construction Engineer and indicate the Contract#33279 on all correspondence IV. Before work starts, we need: a. Proposed Work Schedule (Bar Chart) b. Approved Manning Table ♦�'c. Emergency Contact Person(s)Numbers (phone,cellfax,etc.) d. All Sub-Contractors need approval before they start work e. Source of Materials f. Letter to the District Highway Director listing personnel authorized to sign pay estimates g. Approval by the Engineer of submitted schedules and methods operations h. Name and Address of Liability Insurance Company " k", ,,4>� m aLN ✓r r Shlem Marlborough Road Construction Issues August 12, 2003 MassHighway Project # 601321 • Contacts o MED o Contractor o City o Engineer • Construction Schedule o Ground.Breaking Ceremony o Meeting with Neighborhood o Actual Start o Traffic shift updates o Weekly Site Meetings • ADA • Shop Drawings o Retaining wall, Traffic signals, Storm drainage items • Traffic Management o Work only from 9 AM to 3:30 PM o Message Boards NOW, alert traffic to upcoming construction • Remove and stack items o City to ID location E A R T R `J T E C H I:kwo W338\ymcomtuiionVkk off issues 8.1201.doc A tgCG INlEF,WMwnf/f l!0.COMPANY MASS HIGHWAY J,7176 s Vit Governor May 15, 2002 — RE: Marlborough Road Improvement Project. Salem, MA. 10 Whom It May Concern: I have enclosed for your review, as required by 301 CMR 11.03, an Environmental Notification Fonn for the subject project. All comments should be sent to: Robert Durand, Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Attention: MEPA Office 251 Causeway Street — Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114-2150 Please send a copy of your comments to: Massachusetts Highway Department Environmental Division 10 Park Plaza, Room 4260 Boston, MA 02116-3973 Attn: Matthew DeSorbo If you need any additional information regarding the subject project, please feel free to contact Matthew DeSorbo, at (617) 973-7882. Sincerely, Gregory H. Prendergas Deputy Chief Engineer Environmental Division Massachusetts Highway Department• ren Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116-3973 •(617) 973-7800 For Office Use Only _ Commonwealth of Ececutive Office ofEnviranmentalAffairs Massachusetts EOEA ENF Executive Office of Environmental MEPA Analyst: Affairs ■MEPA Office Phone: 617-626- Environmental Notification Form The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: Marlborough Road Improvement Project. Salem, MA Street: Marlborough Road from Route 107 to Salem/Peabod town Line. Municipality: Salem, MA Watershed: North Coastal Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: Beginning N 917117.72 Start Easting 341884.9 Northing 4707438.8 . End N 918436.51 End: Easting 341762.9 Northing 4708761.7 Longitude: Beginning S247610.03 End S 247149.18 Estimated commencement date: Spring 2002 Estimated completion date: Fall 2003 Approximate cost: $1,300,000.00 Status of project design: 75% complete Proponent: Massachusetts Highway Departm— ent Street: 10 Park Plaza Municipality: Boston State: MA Zip Code: 01970 Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Matthew DeSorbo Firm/Agency: MassHi hwa Street: 10 Park Plaza - Room 4260 Municipality: Boston I State: MA Zip Code: 02116 Phone: (617) 973-7882 Fax: (617) 973-8879 1 E-mail Matthew DeSorbonstate ma us Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ❑Yes ®No Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ❑Yes (EDEA No. ) ®No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? []Yes (EOEA No. ) ®No Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes ®No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) []Yes ®No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ®No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) []Yes ®No Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): MassHi¢hway 100% construction funding Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: Order of Conditions form the Salem Conservation Commission 1 Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s)does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): ❑ Land ❑ Rare Species ❑ Wetlands, Waterways, & Tidelands ❑ Water ❑ Wastewater ❑ Transportation ❑ Energy ❑ Air ❑ Solid & Hazardous Waste ❑ ACEC ❑ Regulations ❑ Historical & Archaeological Resources Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permits & & Environmental Impacts Approvals ® Order of Conditions Total site acreage Approx. ❑ Superceding Order of 21,00 Mz Conditions (5.5 Acres) ❑ Chapter 91 License ❑ New acres of land altered < 1 401 Water Quality Certification Acres of impervious area 5.5 Acres < 1 < 6.5 ❑ MHD or MDC Access Permit Square feet of new bordering N/A ❑ Water Management vegetated wetlands alteration Act Permit Square feet of new other 205.8 M2 ❑ New Source Approval wetland alteration (2,216 ft2) ❑ DEP or MWRA of River Sewer Connection/ C.—Area Extension Permit Acres of new non-water N/A ❑ Other Permits dependent use of tidelands or (including Legislative waterways Approvals)– Specify: Gross square footage N/A N/A N/A Number of housing units N/A N/A N/A Maximum height(in feet) N/A N/A N/A TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day N/A N/A N/A Parking spaces N/A N/A I N/A Gallons/day (GPD)of water use N/A N/A N/A GPD water withdrawal N/A N/A N/A GPD wastewater generation/ N/A N/A N/A treatment Length of water/sewer mains (in N/A N/A N/A miles) CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? []Yes(Specify ) ®No A 0.3 meter(1-foot)deep stormwater drainage swale will be constructed along the periphery of McGrath Park, however, no temporacj. 2 easement or other transfer of real property will be required, therefore the project is not considered a "conversion"of parkland under Article 97. The end use of the affected park property will remain unchanged after construction. Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction, or watershed preservation restriction? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species, Vernal Pools, Priority Sites of Rare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ®Yes(Specify: 150 Marlborough, Salem/Danvers Boundary markers are all proximate to the Project site. See Archeological/Historical Portion of this ENF. ) ❑No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN, Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site, (b) a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach one additional page, if necessary.) The Massachusetts Highway Department and the City of Salem, Department of Public Services are pursuing transportation improvements to Marlborough Road in Salem, MA. The project begins at Highland Avenue(Route 107)and continues north to the Peabody City Line, a distance of 1.4 Kilometers (1.0 mile). The primary purpose of the project is to correct the problem of inadequate sight distance (a serious safety problem), to install sidewalks on both sides of the road, and to provide pedestrian traffic signals in two locations. The project will improve Marlborough Road such that it will bring the road into conformance with the standards contained in the 1997 Massachusetts Highway Department (MassHighway) Highway Design Manual. An ENF is required due to the proposed removal of 32 public shade trees from a public way other than a Massachusetts State Highway right of way. Marlborough Road is an urban collector that provides local access between southwestern Salem and northeastern Peabody through a heavily developed residential area. The road varies in width from approximately 9.2 meters (30 Feet) near Cloverdale Avenue to approximately 11.3 meters (36 feet) near Rockdale Avenue. There are some sections of bituminous concrete sidewalk with granite curbing on portions of the eastern side of the road. The roadway is posted with a speed limit of 30 miles per hour (48.3 kilometers per hour). Design deficiencies on this portion of Marlborough Road have caused serious accidents over the last few years. A total of 49 accidents occurred between 1993 and 1995 (City of Salem Police Department). The majority of accidents occurred near the Salem/Peabody line, Outlook Avenue, and McGrath Park. Roadway rehabilitation will include cold planing of the roadway surface, overlaying the roadway with a variable depth leveling course, and providing a 60-millimeter (2.36 in) course of bituminous concrete to improve traveling conditions. The cold planing and overlaying operation will proceed in accordance with MassHighway standard specifications. A standard travel lane width of 3.75 meters (12.3ft) and a usable right shoulder width of 1.25 meters (4.1 ft) will be constructed. Wheelchair accessibility in the project area will be enhanced through the construction of wheelchair ramps in 3 accordance with the latest MassHighway Wheelchair Standards. In areas where substandard geometry exists, such as the horizontal curve between Cloverdale Avenue/Vista Avenue and north of Vista Avenue, the roadway alignment will be shifted by as much as 2 meters (6.6 feet) to provide for adequate sight distances. The net change in pavement width is within 0.05 meters (0.16 ft) to 1.0 meters (3.3ft). Concrete sidewalks 2 meters (6.6 feet) in width will be located on each side of the roadway. This portion of the project will require that 130 square meters (426.51 square feet) of land be taken from abutting landowners. Proposed takings will total 832.271 square meters(8955.236 square feet) or 0.21 acres. Intersections along Marlboro Road will be minimally redesigned. This redesign will include relocating utility poles and other physical impediments to allow safer access for approaching traffic. Curve radii will also be redesigned to allow safer turning movements to and from residential side streets. Intersections will be clearly delineated with signing and edge lines. In addition, pedestrian traffic signals are proposed at McGrath Park and 45 meters (147 feet) south of South Street. Approximately 206 square meters (2,216 square feet) of construction activity will be located in the 200-foot Riverfront Area associated with Strongwater Brook. Construction activities proposed within the Riverfrom Area consist of sidewalks and slope stabilization. Work will be preformed within the buffer zone of an area of bordering vegetated wetland (BVW). To minimize impacts to one wetland; a 2:1 slope is proposed in one location. All other slopes avoid impacts to wetlands. The project will include modifications to four existing stormwater outfall structures. Of these modifications, one will include construction of a new drainage swale along the periphery of McGrath Park. The stormwater or grassed swale will be constructed to a maximum depth of 0.3 meters (1.0 foot) and will not require a temporary easement or other transfer of real property. Construction of the swale will require less than one day, and the construction will be timed to avoid impacts to the use of the park. It is not anticipated that the project will cause significant changes in stormwater drainage patterns along Marlborough Road. The roadway will remain widened slightly, resulting in only minor increase of pavement surface. Catch basins will be relocated,but outlet points will remain unchanged. Each day the limits of work will be established by the construction contractor and the resident engineer with the requirement of ensuring that the full width of roadway being usable at the end of each workday. Signs warning the traveling public of the road reconstruction will be included in the construction package and will be erected, moved as required and removed by the contractor during the construction phase of the project. Access to all abutters will be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. Alternatives Alternative 1: Proposed Project Alternative 2: Full depth reconstruction of Marlboro Road from Highland Avenue(Route 107)to the Peabody City Line. Reconstruction would include full compliance of MassHighway design standards. This alternative was discarded because of the large amount of land required from abutting landowners,and the extent of wetland impact associated with full depth construction. Alternative 3: The no-build alternative to the project has been discarded because, if the project is not completed, Marlboro Road will remain in a state that does not meet the Massachusetts Highway Department design standards. 4 LAND SECTION — all proponents must fill out this section 1. Thresholds/Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) Yes X No; if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Chance Total Footprint of buildings 0 0 0 Roadways, parking, and other paved areas 5.5 acres <1 acres <65 acres Other altered areas(describe): Footprint of retaining wall 0.03 acres 0.02 acres 0.05 acres Terrain behind retaining wall Drainage swale <.25 acre Undeveloped areas 0 0 0 B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last three years? _Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? _Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM-approved forest management plan: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? _Yes X No; if yes, describe: McGrath Park is located adjacent to the project area. The park is 22.3 acres and is operated by the Salem Park and Recreation Department. It was acquired by the City in 1974,and was formerly the location of a rubbish removal site prior to the City's ownership. The park offers a playground and athletic fields and facilities. It was purchased by the City with CDBG funds and is protected under Article 97. Due to site constraints such as a bedrock outcropping, residential and commercial buildings, topography, and wetlands, stormwater treatment areas are limited. An existing storm drain outlet is located between McGrath Park and an adjacent wetland. After reviewing all other alternative locations,and the location and elevation of the pipe,the existing park was determined as the only suitable location for a storrnwater swale. The stormwater Swale is needed to meet MA DEP stormwater Standards and will serve to reduce stormwater impacts to adjacent wetlands. As a redevelopment project MassHighway will make improvements to the existing drainage system to the maximum extent possible. Due to site constraints, the only available space is adjacent to an existing wetland and within McGrath Park. See attachments for precise locations of the proposed swale, the wetland area in question and McGrath Park. The swale will be located at the eastern boundary of McGrath Park and within an existing utility easement. The swale has been designed so as not to change the control or use of the park. Also, the swale will have little effect on the existing topography and will therefore not inhibit the use of the park. The stormwater swale will be constructed during the most dormant months of the year (November— March) so as not to have an affect on the recreational uses of the park. As the project proponent and owner of the park is the City of Salem, no easement or other transfer of real property is required to construct the swale, therefore there is no "conversion"of parkland under Article 97. E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, 5 agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? _Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? Yes _No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? Yes X No; if yes, describe: G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B? _Yes X No; if yes,describe: H. Describe the project's stormwater impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy: An important component of the project is updating and improving the stormwater collection infrastructure in the project area. Estimated changes to the stormwater outfalls from the stormwater infrastructure in the area are outlined in the table below. The project meets the DEP Stormwater Management Policy's definition of "redevelopment" (roadway improvement involving an increase in payment of one lane width or less). Redevelopment projects are govemed under Performance Standard NO. 7. Standard No. 7 requires that the stormwater performance standards be met to "the maximum extent possible". The specific standards and the project's compliance with them are attached to this ENF. Summary of Stormwater Collection and Flow Changes for the 10 Year Storm Associated with the Marlborough Road Improvements Pr9,'Iect Out Fall Location Existing Outflow Proposed Outflow Change % McGrath Park 24.3 cfs 25.6 cfs 1.3 cfs 5.35% Station 8+65 26.18 cfs 36.46 cfs 10.28 cfs 39.27% �' "Station 11+54 22.39 cfs 25.97 cfs 3.58 cfs 15.99% 'This does not include cfs from culvert that runs through Home Street 27.54 cfs 29.12 cfs 1.58 cfs 5.74% TOTALS 100.41 cfs 117.15 cfs 16.74 cfs 16.67% Volumes correspond to the 10 year storm event I. Is the project site currently being regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? Yes_ CX No; if yes,what is the Release Tracking Number(RTN)? J. If the project is site is within the Chicopee or Nashua watershed, is it within the Quabbin,Ware, or Wachusett subwatershed? Yes X No; if yes,is the project site subject to regulation under the Watershed Protection Act? Yes —No K. Describe the project's other impacts on land: To facilitate site line improvements,the project includes minor land takings at several locations along Marlborough Road, as shown in the following table: 6 Marlboro Road Salem MA Summary of Proposed Land Takings Locations Square Meters Square Feet Acres By pass Lane 552.15 5941.134 1 0.14 102 Marlborough Rd. I 130.9441408.957 0.03 108 Marlborough Rd. 149.177 1 1605.145 1 0.04 Totals 832.271 8955.236 0.21 III. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan and the open space plan and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan(s): The City of Salem currently has both a Master Plan (Update and Action Plan 1996) and an Open Space and Recreation Plan (1996). The transportation portion of the Master Plan/Action Plan identifies as one of its goals "repair and replacement of failing infrastructure and unsafe or outdated design." A map included in this portion of the plan identifies Marlborough Road as a"potential new route or widening"and"Road Improvements"candidate. Of particular note with respect to the Master Plan, the Goals and Strategies Section of the transportation component includes "Improve major vehicular routes through Salem". "Improve safety at Marlborough Road"appears under this heading. The Open Space Plan does not address the area of Marlborough Road specifically, although it does contain a listing of the parks and playgrounds in the vicinity of the Project. This list includes McGrath Park, which is adjacent to the project, and is an Article 97 property. B. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan: Salem is located within the jurisdiction of the Merrimack Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC). At this time, the Commission is in the process of writing a regional land use development plan. The plan is currently in draft form and has not been approved. The proposed project is consistent with another planning document prepared by MVRPC in 1998 entitled Merrimac Valley Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. The transportation policy section of the plan promoted upgrading and expansion of roadways to accommodate increased traffic volumes. The Marlboro Road project is being proposed primarily for safety reasons and to bring the road into compliance with MHD standards. Although the project will benefit increased future traffic growth associated with anticipated growth unrelated to the project, the project is not being proposed to accommodate substantial traffic increases associated with a planned growth area. Therefore, the Regional Plan transportation policies do not apply to the proposed project, and the project is not inconsistent with the Regional Policy Plan. C. Will the project require any approvals under the local zoning by-law or ordinance(i.e. text or map amendment, special permit, or variance)? _Yes X No; if yes, describe: D. Will the project require local site plan or project impact review? _Yes X No; if yes, describe: 7 RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see 301 CMR 11.03(2))?_Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: Correspondence with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (MNHESP) has confirmed that there are no rare species or habitat found in the vicinity of the Project site. See attachments for a copy of MNHESP correspondence relative to this project. B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat?_Yes X No C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wetlands,Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. It. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)?_Yes_No. If yes, 1. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat(contact: Environmental Review, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Route 135, Westborough, MA 01581, allowing 30 days for receipt of information): 2. Have you surveyed the site for rare species? _Yes_No; if yes, please include the results of your survey. 3. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? _Yes_No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? Yes No B. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes_No; if yes, describe: C. Will the project alter"significant habitat"as designated by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.30)? _Yes_No;if yes, describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on rare species including indirect impacts(for example, stormwater runoff into a wetland known to contain rare species or lighting impacts on rare moth habitat): 8 WETLANDS. WATERWAYS AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands,waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))?_Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits(or a local Order of Conditions)related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? X Yes_No; if yes, specify which permit: This project will require an Order of Conditions.. C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes"toie they question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Describe any wetland resource areas currently existing on the project site and indicate them on the site plan: The project area contains four wetland areas that will not be directly impacted. However, the work will occur within the 100-foot buffer zone to the wetlands. The work will also occur within the 200-foot Riverfront Area to Strongwater Brook. Since the work will occur within the buffer zones to the wetlands and within the Riverfront Area, the project will require the filing of a Notice of Intent B. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area (in square feet)or Length (in linear feet) Land Under the Ocean Qfl! Designated Port Areas It, Coastal Beaches Q ft, Coastal Dunes Q ft Barrier Beaches Q ft= Coastal Banks Q ff Rocky Intertidal Shores 0 ftz Salt Marshes p it, Land Under Salt Ponds 0 ft Land Containing Shellfish 0 ft Fish Runs Q fiz Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage QfP Inland Wetlands Bank Q ftz Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Q ft2 Land under Water Q ftz Isolated Land Subject to Flooding 0 ft Bordering Land Subject to Flooding Q ftz Riverfront Area 2Q5.8 Square m tors (2,216 Square Feet) C. Is any part of the project 1. a limited project? X Yes_No 310 CMR 10.53(3)(f) :Improvement of existing roadways 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _Yes X No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway?_Yes X No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _Yes X No; if yes, describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to Outstanding Resource Waters? _Yes X No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? Yes X No; ifes y identify identi the area (square ft): 9 D. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c.1 31A)?_Yes X_No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed or a local Order of Conditions issued?_Yes _No; if yes, list the date and DEP file number: Was the Order of Conditions appealed? Yes _No. Will the project require a variance from the Wetlands regulations?_Yes X No. E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? _Yes X No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state or local law? _Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (in s.f.)? F. Describe the project's other impacts on wetlands (including new shading of wetland areas or removal of tree canopy from forested wetlands): The Project will include creation of a drainage Swale within the buffer zone associated with a wetland area. This swale will direct water from its associated outfall away from a public park (McGrath Park). 111. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Is any part of the project site waterways or tidelands(including filled former tidelands)that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? _Yes X No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 license or permit affecting the project site? _Yes _No; if yes, list the date and number: B. Does the project require a new or modified license under M.G.L.c.91? _Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water dependent use? Current ____ Change w Total C. Is any part of the project 1. a roadway, bridge,or utility line to or on a barrier beach? _Yes_X No; if yes, describe: 2. dredging or disposal of dredged material? __Yes X No; if yes,volume of dredged material: 3. a solid fill, pile-supported, or bottom-anchored structure in flowed tidelands or other waterways? _Yes X No; if yes,what is the base area? 4. within a Designated Port Area? _Yes X No C. Describe the project's other impacts on waterways and tidelands: ("Describe other impacts on wetlands."). The project will occur within the 100 foot buffer zones to wetlands and within the 200 foot Riverfront Area to Strongwater Brook. IV. Consistency: A. Is the project located within the Coastal Zone? X Yes _ No; if yes, describe the project's consistency with policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: It is anticipated that this project will be found consistent with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management. B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _Yes X No; if yes, with identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency that plan: 10 WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered"Yes"tog tiff question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. H. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Chanoe Total Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer Municipal or regional water supply B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project?_Yes _No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, 1. have you submitted a permit application? _Yes _No; if yes, attach the application 2. have you conducted a pump test? _Yes _No; if yes, attach the pump test report D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons/day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal? Yes No E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility,water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Exi Chance Total Water supply well(s)(capacity, in gpd) Drinking water treatment plant(capacity, in gpd) Water mains (length, in miles) F. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of water,which basins are involved,what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve 1. new water service by a state agency to a municipality or water district? _YesNo 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _Yes No; if yes, how many acres_of alteration? — . 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? Yes No G. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts)on water resources, quality,facilities and services: III. Consistency–Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources,quality,facilities and services: 11 -- WASTEWATER jECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00): Discharge to groundwater(Title 5) ' istinChangTotal Discharge to groundwater(non-Title 5) Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water Municipal or regional wastewater facility TOTAL B. Is there sufficient capacity in the in the existing collection system to accommodate the project? Yes_No_ C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility?_Yes _No; if no, describe how capacity will be increased: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main,or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No. If yes, describe as follows: ist' Change Total Wastewater treatment plant(capacity, in gpd) i Sewer mains (length, in miles) Title 5 systems(capacity, in gpd) E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater,which basins are involved,what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? Yes No G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings,or other sewage residual materials? _Yes _No; if yes,what is the capacity(in tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal 12 - H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts)on wastewater generation and treatment facilities: III. Consistency-- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? _Yes _No; if yes, indicate the EOEA number for the plan and describe the relationship of the project to the plan TRANSPORTATION -- TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? —Yes XNo; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered"No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered"Yes"to 'either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. Ill. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: e Number of parking spaces xi Chang Total Number of vehicle trips per day ITE Land Use Code(s): B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existina Chance Total C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: III. Consistency-Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal,regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic,transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: 13 - ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))?_.&_ Yes _ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: The project will involve the removal of 32 public shade trees, many of which exceed the 14 inch DBH threshold. The trees will be replaced at a rate of 2:1 where feasible. The exact placement of these trees has not yet been determined. The final location of replacement trees will be determined in consultation with the adjacent landowners. B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II. Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities at the project site: Existino ChanoTotal Length (in linear feet)of new or widened roadway 5282.15 0 5282.15 Width (in feet)of new or widened roadway 30 +2 32 Other transportation facilities: B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 0 2. Cutting of living public shade trees(number)? 32 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? 0 III. Consistency—Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: The project will improve traffic flow and safety through the Marlborough Road corridor, providing improved movement if people and goods. The proposed cross-sectional width conforms to the State requirements for bicycle accommodations. New sidewalks and pedestrian crossings will improve safety for pedestrian traffic. 14 ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy(see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. It. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: e Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts) E ixistin h n Total Length of fuel line(in miles) Length of transmission lines(in miles) Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility,what are 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line,will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right-of-way?_Yes _No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency--Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: 15 - AIR QUALITY SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality(see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: D. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered"No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes"to IfthAr question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?_Yes _No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day)of: Existing Change Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen Lead Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide B.. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: 16 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste(see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _Yes__X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes"toie then question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste?_Yes _No; if yes,what is the volume (in tons per day)of the capacity: Exi tin Chang Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling,treatment or disposal of hazardous waste?_Yes _No; if yes,what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day)of the capacity: Existing an Total Storage Recycling Treatment Disposal C. If the project will generate solid waste(for example, during demolition or construction),describe alternatives considered for re-use,recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? Yes No E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): III. Consistency—Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: 17 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I. Thresholds I Impacts A. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? X_Yes_ No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? _Yes _X_No; if yes, please describe: According to the Massachusetts Historical Commission (correspondence dated July 9, 1998) the proposed project area contains three properties which are included in the Inventory of Historical and Archeological Assets of the Commonwealth. These properties include 150 Marlborough Street (MHC#SAL.1), 180 Marlborough Street (MHC#DAL.2) and the Salem-Danvers Boundary Marker (MHC#SAL.943). B. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? Yes No;if yes, please describe: C. If you answered"No"to all parts of both questions A and B, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered"Yes"to any part of either question'A or question B, fill out-the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. D. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? X Yes _No; if yes, attach correspondence See attachments for a copy of Project Correspondence with Massachusetts Historical Commission. The Massachusetts Highway Department Cultural Resources Section will consult with the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC)to ensure compliance with the MHC Regulations. E. Describe and assess the projects other impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: The Project has been designed such that it will have no impact on listed historical sites in the vicinity of the Project site that have been identified by MHC. II. Consistency— Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: Under the review procedures of the programmatic agreement between MassHighway and the Federal Highway Administration with the Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation,the project will be reviewed for possible effects to historic and archaeological resources. Refer to the attached letter dated July 9, 1998 addressed to Michael J. Bisschop from Gary Hammer of the MHC. 18 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Plan,at an appropriate scale,of existing conditions of the project site and its immediate context, showing all known structures,roadways and parking lots, rail rights-of-way,wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities 2. Plan of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). 3. Original U.S.G.S. map or good quality color copy(8-1/2 x 11 inches or larger)indicating the project location and boundaries. 4. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF,in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). 5. Other: Project Stormwater Management Policy Project Agency Correspondence CERTIFICATIONS: 1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1): The Salem Evening News,Beverly MA.. _ff 1/5- (Name) /5-(Name) (Date) 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). y4V 0J Lcw--4� ate J n Cogliano Acting Commissioner —L�7 I a- �� ' Da Sig ature of Responsible Officer Dae Signature of person preparing or Proponent ENF (if different from above) Kevin Walsh Matthew DeSorbo Name(print or type) Name (print or type) MasslEghway Massllighway Firm/Agency Firm/Agency 10 Park Plaza 10 Park Plaza Street Street Boston,Massachusetts 02116 Boston,Massachusetts 02116 Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip (617)973-7529 (617) 973-7882 Phone Phone 19 AI � Wolt ' lMIVA ►•MOSMI '� \ ON jYI ��I \`Ri MR,_..WIN li'� 4,W1 ,21111 RMA ala" U'1" IMM III q It Wr �Q IN11 _ � 11 ;aaaro® c C�i)lNO 4 Ot AWN Mal i Rif JiYOld 7�w S"ori.._ J., .✓ WE\w-2R1 ffiW�oyF®VR , 118 ii Ie!Mn ` MOM At bov, and Salem quadrangles. woz e i i i 1"�� ► JBONN Scale 400 2000 40M, Feet(� IJf�` Svsd.sa�.!.odiIu .sl�'a I -�.a>.aenvlvumcvx�rxr.>eatv.:x:rim i-��u� I 1 11 11 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 r ATTACHMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POLICY Marlborough Road Improvements The proposed project meets the Stormwater Management Policy's definition of "redevelopment" (Roadway improvement involving an increase in pavement of one lane width or less). Redevelopment projects are governed under Performance Standard No.7. Standard No. 7 requires that the stormwater performance standards be met to the"maximum extend practicable". Site constraints, the limited Right of Way (ROW), and dense residential development limit the opportunities for significant drainage improvements for some outlets. However, where possible, BMP's have been incorporated in an effort to meet the standards to the greatest extent practicable. Proposed drainage improvements include: Outlet No. 1: Sta 4+40 Marlborough Road This portion of the existing street is sporadically curbed, with sidewalks varying from zero to both sides. The improvements will provide a replacement drainage system with full street curbing and sidewalks on both sides of the street. All proposed catch basins will be hooded, deep sump catch basins. The existing outfall pipe is too small for the new drain system, and outlets in the wetlands. A new outfall pipe and grass swale will be constructed in the New England Power Easement on Salem property to allow some treatment before discharge to the wetlands. Outlet No. 2: Sta 8+65 Marlborough Road This portion of the existing street is sporadically curbed, with occasional sidewalks on one side of the street. The improvements will provide a replacement drainage system with full street curbing and sidewalks on both sides of the street. All proposed catch basins will be hooded, deep sump catch basins. The existing outfall pipe is too small for the new drain system, and outlets outside of a wetland. A new outfall pipe will have to be installed along the alignment of the existing pipe. Appropriate riprap will be placed at the end of the new pipe for velocity dissipation. All work will be done outside the wetland limits. Outlet No.3: Sta 11+53 Marlborough Road This portion of the existing street is sporadically curbed, with occasional sidewalks on one side of the street. The improvements will provide a replacement drainage system with full street curbing and sidewalks on both sides of the street. All proposed catch basins will be hooded, deep sump catch basins. The existing outfall pipe is adequate for the new drain pipe system. F:\37338\PROAPemits\Stomn ter\Stomn to Management Attachment I&2.doc Outlet No.4: Sta 13+03 Marlborough Road This portion of the existing street is sporadically curbed, with sidewalks varying from zero to both sides. The improvements will provide a replacement drainage system with full street curbing and sidewalks on both sides of the street. All proposed catch basins will be hooded, deep sump catch basins. The existing outfall pipe is adequate for the new drain pipe system. The following summarizes the proposed project's compliance with the Performance Standards: Standard No. 1 Untreated Direct Discharge of Stormwater: No new direct discharges of untreated stormwater are proposed. There are currently 4 outlets that discharge untreated stormwater runoff to receiving resource areas. Outlet No. 1: Under proposed conditions the replacement drainage system will provide treatment of the stormwater discharges with use of hooded, deep sump catch basins and by installing a grass swale between the end of the pipe and the wetlands. Space limitations and site constraints do not allow for other structural control measures for peak rate or water quality control. Outlets No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4: Under proposed conditions the replacement drainage system will provide treatment of the stormwater discharges with use of hooded,deep sump catch basins. Space limitations and site constraints do not allow for other structural control measures for peak rate or water quality control. Standard No.2 Post-Development Peak Discharge: The proposed project will result in a net increase in impervious area, and a corresponding slight increase in peak rate. Existing houses and driveways exclude the option of obtaining additional ROW to provide space for BMP's. Site constraints within the ROW prevent compliance with this standard at each point of discharge. Pre and Post-Development peak rates at each outlet are presented in Attachment C. Standard No. 3 Recharge to Groundwater: The proposed increase in impervious area will reduce the volume of runoff recharging to groundwater. Poorly drained soils and shallow depths to bedrock do not provide suitable site conditions to construct and operate infiltration systems within the project area. Slow infiltrating soils and shallow depth to bedrock could result in storage of water within the road subbase that would adversely impact pavement strength and integrity. Due to the conditions cited above, Standard No. 3 can not be met for this project. Standard No. 4 80% TSS Removal: Space limitations within the ROW, existing structures, and site constraints do not permit treatment of each discharge to meet the 80% TSS removal standard. The hooded deep sump catch basins will provide 25% treatment of TSS, with additional treatment at outlet No. 1 of 25%with the proposed grass swale to provide a total 56%TSS removal. Standard No. 5 Higher Potential Pollutant Loads:The proposed project site does not contain land uses defined by DEP to have higher potential pollutant loads. Therefore Standard No.5 is not applicable to this project. F:\37338\PROJ\P r its\stmmwattt\Stortn to Managemmt Attachment 1&2.doc Standard No. 6 Protection of Critical Areas: The project site does not contain critical areas with sensitive resources. Therefore, Standard No. 6 is not applicable to this project. Standard No. 7 Redevelopment Project: The project is a redevelopment project. The applicable stormwater standards have been met to the greatest extent possible. Standards No. 5 and No. 6 are not applicable to this project. Standards No. 1, No. 8 and No. 9 have been met. Due to site constraints and potential adverse impacts to the pavement strength and integrity, Standard No. 2 and No. 3 can not be met. Standards No. 4 has not been fully met at each discharge point. However, stormwater management measures have been incorporated to the greatest extent practicable. Standard No. 8 Erosion/Sediment Control: Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project design to prevent erosion, control sedimentation movement, and stabilize exposed soils during construction. Standard No. 9 Operation and Maintenance Plan: Catch basins will be inspected and cleaned on an annual basis. Drainage swales will be inspected annually,and maintained on as needed basis. F:t37338[PRO.Mermits\stomwater\Stormwater Management Attachment la2.doc ATTACHMENT 2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN Marlborough Road Improvements The City of Salem Department of Public Works is the Owner and responsible party to maintain and operate the Marlborough Road BMP's. Catch basins will be inspected and cleaned on an annual basis. Drainage swales will be inspected annually,and maintained on as needed basis. Marlborough Road Operation and Maintenance Plan 1 November 2000 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Massachusetts Historical Commission July 9, 1998 Michael J.Bisschop Rust Environment&Infrastructure 225 Friend Street Boston,MA 02214 RE: Reconstruction of Marlborough Road,Salem,MA;MHC R&C#21984 Dear Mr.Bisschop: Staff of the Massachusetts Historical Commission have reviewed the information you submitted, received June 18, 1998,concerning the project referenced above. After a review of the materials submitted and MHC files,staff of the MHC have the following comments. The proposed project area contains three properties which are included in the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth-maintained by NEC. These properties include.80 Marlborough Street(MHC#SAL.1), 180 Marlborough Street(MHC#SAL.2),and the Salem-Danvers- Boundary Marker(MHC# SAL.943). The MHC understands that the proposed project involves: 1)minor new construction in the vicinity of Vista Avenue to improve horizontal site distance;2)provision of handicapped accessible concrete sidewalks with granite curb on both sides;3)cold planing and installation of overlay pavement;and 4) restriping to provide 3.25 meter travel lanes and 1.25 meter shoulders. You should be aware that the Massachusetts Highway Department(MassHighway)and the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)entered into a programmatic agreement with the Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC)and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation in 1993 which establishes new.procedures for the review of MassHighway/FHWA projects for possible effects to historic and archaeological resources. In accordance with the provisions of this programmatic agreement,cultural resource specialists from the MassHighway will conduct an initial review of this project to assess its potential effects on historic properties. MassHighway will then forward the results of this review to MHC for review and comment. Proposed projects such as this one should first be submitted to the Cultural Resources Section of MassHighway, 10 Park Plaza,Room 4260,Boston,MA, 02116,to the attention of James Elliott, Section Chief. If you have questions concerning the MassHighway review procedures;please contact the I Cultural Resources Section at(617)973-7500. 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 • (617) 727-8470 Fax: (617) 727-5128 TDD: 1-800-392-6090 Website: wtvw.magnet.srate.ma.us/sec/mhc These comments are provided to assist the Massachusetts Highway Department and the Federal Highway Administration in complying with the stipulations of the programmatic agreement pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended(36 CFR 800). Please do not hesitate to contact Ann Lattinville of this office should you have any questions. Sincerely, Garym Director of Architectural Review Massachusetts Historical Commission xc: Salem Historical Commission James Elliott,MHD i _ Commonwealth of Massachusetts Direr ol Fisheries &Wildlife Wayne F. MacCallum, Director December 10, 2001 Erin A. Haight Earth Tech, Inc. 196 Baker Avenue Concord, MA 01742 Re: Marlborough Road Saler,,NIA NHESP File: 00-8106 Dear Ms. Haight, Thank you for contacting the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program for information regarding state-protected rare species in the vicinity of the site identified above. At this time we are not aware of any rare plants or animals or exemplary natural communities in the area of this site. This review concerns only rare species of plants and animals and ecologically significant natural communities for which the Program maintains site-specific records. This review does not rule out the. possibility that more common wildlife or vegetation might be adversely affected if this site is developed, especially if it will modify currently undeveloped areas. Should site plans change,or new rare species. information become available,this evaluation may be reconsidered. Please call me at(508)792-7270 x.154 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Christine Vaccaro Environmental Review Assistant y�rr4 v Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Route 135,Westborough, MA 01581 Tel: (508)792-7270 x 200 Fax: (508)792-7821 An Agency of the Department of Fisheries,Wildlife&Environmental Caw Enforcement �� http://www.state.ma.us/dfwele/dfw/nhesp _ Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division ef Fisheries &Wildlife Wayne F. MacCallum, Director December 10,2001 Erin A. Haight Earth Tech,Inc. 196 Baker Avenue Concord, MA 01742 Re: Marlborough Road Caiem, MA NHESP File: 00-8106 Dear Ms. Haight, Thank you for contacting the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program for information regarding state-protected rare species in the vicinity of the site identified above. At this time we are not aware of any rare plants or animals or exemplary natural communities in the area of this site. This review concerns only rare species of plants and animals and ecologically significant natural communities for which the Program maintains site-specific records. This review does not rule out the possibility that more common wildlife or vegetation might be adversely affected if this site is developed, especially if it will modify currently undeveloped areas. Should site plans change, or new rare species. information become available,this evaluation may be reconsidered. Please call me at(508)792-7270 x.154 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Christine Vaccaro Environmental Review Assistant i Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Route 135,Westborough, MA 01581 Tel: (508)792-7270 x 200 Fax: (508)792-7821 A An Agency of the Department of Fisheries,Wildlife& Environmental Law Enforcement �� http://www.state.ma.us/dfwele/dfw/nhesp ` Distribution List: Salem, MA. Marlborough Road Improvement Project Secretary Bob Durand Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Executive Office of Attn: MEPA Coordinator Environmental Affairs 10 Park Plaza, Room 6620 Attn: MEPA Office Boston, MA. 02116 251 Causeway Street, Suite900 Boston, MA. 02114 Merrimack Valley Planning 160 Main Street Secretary of Transportation Haverhill, MA. 01830-5000 Executive Office of Transportation and Construction Coastal Zone Management 10 Park Plaza Room 3510 Attn: project review Coordinator Boston, MA. 02116 251 Causeway Street, Suite 500 Boston, MA. 02114 Secretary of Environmental Affairs Executive Office of Environmental Division of Marine Fisheries Affairs Attn: Environmental Reviewer Attn: Bob O'Connor 50 A Portside Drive 251 Causeway Street, 9' Floor Pocasset, MA. 02559 Boston, MA. 02114-2150 Natural Heritage and Endangered Department of Environmental Protection Species Program Mr. David Murphy Commonwealth of Massachusetts Commissioners Office Route 135 One Winter Street Westborough, MA. 01581 Boston, MA. 02108 State Senator Department of Environmental Protection Frederick E. Berry North East Regional Office Room 109-D 205 Lowell Street State House Wilmington, MA. 01887 Boston, MA. 02133 Massachusetts Historical Commission State Representative 220 Morrissey Blvd. J. Michael Ruane Boston, MA. 02125 Room 238 State House Massachusetts Highway Department Boston, MA. 02133 District Four 519 Appleton Street Arlington, MA. 02476 Distribution List: Salem, MA. Marlborough Road Improvement Project Separate Mailing to the following city agencies: c/o Salem Town Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA. 01970 - Salem City Council - Salem Planning Board - Salem Conservation Commission - Salem Board of Health .. - MAiLBCF� H ';CAOScE ,HE_ IG'. I VA I Zoo I I PROJECT FILE No. 601221 GENERAL PLAN I I 1 1 - I STA 0+88.100-MARLBOROUGH ROAD 8 \ STA 0+00.000 ORLEANS AVENUE BEGINNING CF PROJECT I MARLBOROUGH ' OAD STA. 0+45.374 I —` .. N 91 71 1 7.7 6 BOTTOM OF PROP. SLOPE E 247310.029 — �� I�, PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED LIMIT OF WORK LOAM BORROW AND SEED I BOTTOM OF PROP. SLOPE p I rORLEANS AVENUE PROP. CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK LIMIT OF WORK MARLBOROUGH ROAD PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED \ 0+12.858 PROP. too mm MODIFIEDLOAM BORROW ANO SEED \ a CnLO BORROW ANO/ STq, Q+75.802 + SEEDPROP. 4.9 m CEMENT. 7 PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONC. ORNEWAY 1 e GONG. DRIVEWAY 1 \ PROP. CEMENT CONC. PROP. BR. CONC. DRNEWAY \ � ,\ PROP. CEMENT CONC. WHEELCHMR RAMP +Fa„s l WHEELCHAIR RAMP C. \ y a,.�'' y"Y,:. '� w e` PROP. 2 m CEMENL `e 1 ` ^ll PROP. 2.m EMENT C0 C. SIDEWALK R&5 SIGN m 1 ROP:BIT CONC. I r,.,'. ' PROP. BR. CO C. OR DNC. r r. \\P PROPje BIF p `eF�L \ WALK SURFACE 1 r IVEIYAY II EM c SIDEW '"' ENT CONC.(WHEELCHAIR RAM rr \ ire` CONI. WALK SURFACE\ \\ my PROP. 2I m CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK PROP. 2 EMENT CONC. SIOEWALN N > \ I I 'III p PROP. 9.1 m �E NT CONC. DRrvEWAYPROp. 1100 mm MODIFIED I I L' 0 Kr wnvr �4\ m I u .II I CONC. WALK �wnr c ur PROP. BIT. COCON ORNEWAY •, "`�' Q\� t. LOAM BORROW AND SEED ( \ (R&R) I �1 >•s$ s 3 I an.r ' I�r-80TTO� OF PROP. SL PE r rr I AlI ^I� rnAm aMss g\ ^' PROP. CEMEN CONC. EWALR u P \ * \ F l a - r ROP. SLOPE D MEET EXIST Cc4Re E CURB E VB \ pr (rR&R) CITY I I OGATIO01 NIi - 27'707 m PROP, 3 UGH ROA ?w REMOVE m o BR. 5 000 PROP. COLA SAW CUTJ ' PROP. 95 mm rn m 5.000 m PROP. MARIBOROUOR RD. fl� PROP_SAW CUf CONC. PAVEMJYPf�-1 _ aN O p.C._ �1� e_P1ANF qN�-OvERUY Be CONC. 5.000 m 1 _i PR �-c +01.94 �- uts �A PRONII E 5.000 m o OP, C / -R=J68.00 PAVEMENT TYPE I-Y '-Oe - CURB 1YPE VB \ CURB CE 7.210 m_,j — ' c -_E PROP. COLD PLAN AN'D OVERLAY ROP. SqW CU uc - L 9 \ I P. GRAN RB TYPE PROP. SAW CUT -5.000 m I CUVH SY ((( Y�Q R ar Y" t \ aus '8 R&R CUR6' LOCATION LIN ` \ a ral�1 APRIL 1940 CITY r+01 PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT®. \ R&R SIGNAL POLE \� r;' CONC. DRNEWAY \ 9L PROP. BR. PROP. BR. CONC. WALK SURFACE PROP. BIT. 1\ CONC. ORA[WAY M1 \ p 3 CONC. DRNEWAY - \ BOTTOM OF PRCP. SLOPE PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT CON . ORNEW'A`- . r•-ne �- PROP. BrT. CONC. WALK SURFACE PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROP CEM CONC o PROP. 2 m CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK \\ LOAM BORROW AND SEED WHEELCHAIR RAMP ®\ PROP. BR CONC. WALK SURFACE PROP. 18.2 m CEMENT CONC. DRNEWAY MEET IXIST CURB RAMPROP. BIT. \ PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONC. ORrVEWAY rr PROP CEM CAM \ .� WHEELCHAIR RP CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP, 9Rr CONC. DRNEWAY \ \ PROP. BrT. CONC. WALK SURFACE .\ PRQP. 1.SSm CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK nom.• ' P PRCP. 10 mm MODIFIED LOAM 90RROW AND SEED �\ (MIT OE e �� / pROP. FIELDSTONE WALK M� PLBORO ROAD \ \ PROP: 2 ^'CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK m TACO s: 8.747 % BOTTOM OF PROP. SLOPE l\ - PROP( 100 mm 11001f1ED LOAM BORROW AND SEED _ PROP. BR. CONC. DRIVEWAY a \ e ' \ / \ PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONC. DRNEWAY NOTE` / V ` S O V i - SCALE IN METERS LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE ° s 10 15 25 DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE _ SEE SHEE7 NO. •:.-__'.]° - Ma I -ODII ' L-� ' PPO�IECT FILE No. 601721 I GENERAL P1-4N I -171 1 1 1 / / PROP. CE T CONC. p - `�_- ` ` LIMIT OF WORK- ' e r" WHEELCr -F"P I 1 _MICHAEL ROAD / / \ O __ — LIMIT OF WORK ,I STA. 0+16.000 wETLANo 'PR (LCpNCDRIVEWA PROP. CEMENT CONC. VERDON STREET `ice v N4 / Q' - f WHEELCHAIR RAMP / I 1 � PRCP. 3.9 m CEMENT 1 STA.ii 0+12.60 � � .e�.r' S PROP. 2 m CEMENT CCNC. DRIVEWAY PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED \ \ �' /� CONC. SIDEWALK \ PRCP. f00 mm .MOOIFlE LOAM BORROW AND SEED 11 PROP. BIT. CONC. CRNEWAY 1 PROP. CEMENT COP �/.r� TOP OF \ WHEELCHAIR RAMP .r PROP. SLOPE- PROP. LOAM BORROW AND SEE BOTTv MS OPE /•✓'�• PROP. 4.9 m-CEME.Ni 1 yN" / // GQ,T`µ �� BOTTOM OF O s CONC. DRIVEWAY - PROP. SLOPE /,C1 PROP. CEMENT P P. 2 m CEMLT el +�/ � CONC. WALK \� _ C. lz PROW PROP. 9,1 m CEMENT xR � PROP. CEMENT 1 P o ,N-•" `P•, �•r ,� BIT. CONC, DRNEW'AY T- .�• ` P P!' CEMENT C0 CO DRIVEWAY \ CONC. WALK NJT PROP. 2 m CEMENT I �I ELCHAIR RATA PO \ e PROP. 2 m CEMENT o m, 1 PROP. 2 m CEMENT 10 —J PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK CONC. SIOEwmx PR P. BR. CONC. WALK SUR E CONIC. DRIVEWAY \ PROP. BIT. CONC. ORNEWAY CONC. SIDEWALK $ v, 1 / I PROP. 1CO mm ` 1 C \\ I cp o`U I PROP. CEMENT I MODIFIED LOAM PROP, 100-mrtI,MODIiIED +P TCP OF � CONC, WALL( BORROW MID SEED 1 LOAM BORROW ANfY'.SEE0. O (, 7 / Ma•+PROP. SLOP€ .a u PRP OF OP- F 11'1 '� \ 1 " BOTTOM OF 00 mm MODIFIED I °' rPf x PROP. SLOPE - � Q�` yo. BORROW AND SEED I 1 b 3 , PROP. GRANITE 't h' Lv PROP, GRANITE VB _ R@R) °1 n CURB TYPE VB ki/ .y�' CURB TYPE VB a.+s I 4t2 11 I Y R SR a dl m RkR)I .arPROP.SAW CUT m ` 9 Y a a. L ' { m 9 _ 'yV�11, J a _ �_ __�'_Q 3� i � ti" .a\ e, •'+�� «wss e + �� Rk�) 450 1 )_ . i •.,. _ _ _ , l — uAsa� PROP, COLD PLANE AND ----__— __ - --" R�3 m o0 5. 00 m CURB _ R�5 m au, 5.000 m / 'I+ J 19.950 R�5 m 0 +34.11 8 5.000 m q _ E VBA +79.67 o L 40.27) m - 3`F'- / 0'/ —i-- PROP. COLD PLMIECAND OVERLAY I m m CURD T4P �m��e 4.48E R-300.000 m P,T. 0-5, +52.700 PROP. SAW CUT NB'10'lOYI— J • z _ �-OVEK�•' -J 0 1 5.000 m u.. PROP. 95 mm BIT. - -1 +08.932 PROP. 95 mm BR. R�3 m CONC. PAVEMENT TYPE I-1 1BJ.675 m TF- W CONC. PAVEMENT TYPE I-1 W MARLBOROUGH ROAD s.DDo m 1$ S N 5.000 m J `` R-5 m a �5 m 5.000 m PROP. SAW CUT - 3 0 we V wei 10 A 4 yj0� LTM« REMOVE LOCATION � \ APRIL � m o..rs 1 c1 U y «.a ° srun, ora �M„ + arse aea w °P+� �� " >.• 1 TOI OF PROP. SLOPE \ o i` a s• 9 665 ows to `f 1 MH y \ °- 3i LIMIT, OF WORK/ ROP. CEMENT M' I •� 1 cont. $IOEwAuc GREF�NIAWN PROP. > s P e�•o/ 4.9 m CEM ` . OR STA. 0+25.700 1 1 •�. ONC. D�- EM'A 'ty 3 \ y6 I I m" P PrBfrCONC. m ` x. PROP. I � �" • 3 - ti PROP. 100 mm MOD ED \ AVE��/ ,. TOP OF PROP. SLOPE \ $N � I oo. m PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT PROP. 2 m CEMENT °d' , x LONA BORROW AND SEED+Ad CONC. D AY �, i �� PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED + m I I IEW CONC. SIOEWALIC as 3 1 hl -1 T LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. FIELDSTONE WALK PROP. OR m MODIFIED - , / /� 1 1 p 11 I" 1 LOAM BORROW \µD SEED `U/-///-PR`/BOTTOM ROP. 5 OPEi � o' TOP OF PROP. SLOPE o u PROP. 2 m CEMENT Q , ' 3 CONC. SIDEWALK ; \so°�• BOTTOM OF PROP. SLOPE 1 OP. 100 mm MODIFIED 3 G1 CLOVERDALE A LOAM BORROW AND SEED ' A PROP. CEMENT PROP. OR.y0NC�UR7WAY STA Ot 14,3$0 1 rn PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED 1 PROP, CEMENT Tn CONC. SIDEWALK LOAM ORROW AND SEED LOAM T. CONI AND SEED /� CONIC. WALK 1 ) m PROP, C�MENT-GONC. PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT C7 1 PROP.BR. CONC. DRIVEWAY oZ 1 EEL'EHAIR RAMP CONC. DRNEWAY 1 1 PROP. BR. C NC. DRIVEWAY L / PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED 1 ` ^r • 1 PROP. 4,9 m CEMENT LOAM BORROW AND SEED 1 ; � BOTTOM OF ROP. SLOPE [sl PROP. OR m C ENT I CONC. ORNEWAY s PROP. 00 mm MODIFIED CONC. ORNEWAY L_ PROP. DRI m CEMENT PROP. 2 m CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY g Z BOTTOM OF CONC. SIDEWALK \ , LONA 8 BROW AND SEEP PROP. SLOPE -- CRAIRECPNC. 1 PROP. CEMENT TTI 1 1 CONC. Wq� BOTTOM Of PROP. SLOPE 1 POOP. 100 mm MODIFIED \ ' � 1 LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP.I CEMENT CONC. PCONC. SIDEWALK ROP. 2 m CEMENT WHEEL HAIR RAMP \ BOTTOM . PROP. SLOPE \V/ PROP, CEMENT mm MODIFIED CONC. ROP. 1 o \ 1 WHEELCHNR RAMP LOAM B ROW AND SEED 1 R o v 11 1 Nam-. PROP. 100 mry ED k.RCP. 2 m CEMENT 2 y \ 1 I LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON l L ERMOR AND SEED C INC. SIDEWALK s 8 0 PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE SCALE IN MIETERS ZQ 16 DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE Q 5 to �i ENGINEER. :EE SHEET NO. VAFI_CFCI„ .O.:J VA 1-001 PROJECT r1L No. 501J21 GENERAL PLAN I i i I i I i I i I PROP. mm MODIFIED / LOAM BORCR ROW AND-SEED PROP. 4.9 CEMENT PROP. CEMENT CONIC. WHEELCHAIR RAMP CONC. DRIVEWAYPROP. BIT. //y CONC. ORNEWAY PROP. 2 m CEMEI CONCRETE SIDEWALK �R&ft) I I PROP. GRANITE CURB TYPE VB BOTTOM OF PR . SLOPE PROP LOCATION LINE LOCATION LINE APRIL 1940 CITY LOCATION UNE APRIL 1940 CITY -PROP. 100 m MODIFIED _ R AND SEED OP LOAM BO - OF /I PROP. FULL DEPTH RECONSTR yF PROP. 2 m CEMENT REM e.r' \'ORp' STA 3+91 TO STA 5+94 +/- CONC. SIDEWALK I �>PoSED PROP LOCATION LINE / mm PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED SCOP LOAM*BORROW AND SEED / mmb i m o LOAM BORROW AND SEEP 5.000 4u 5=0PE, i 5000 m / SN --� — — — — �F— _PROPOSE PROP. GRANTE CURB TYPE VB Pp OSE,O a 8.100 C PROP95 , mm ' P T 71.280 �I —' 'E•R /gam PSE BIT. CONIC. P. 5 00 5.000m O PROP. COLA p E I-I PROP. GRANITE CURB 7YP��µO Ol'ERIAY�� NI PROP, SAW _ _ g4B 475821 52J91v 79 85 m 8.700 m —_——__ SAW CUT 9„ ttpP.S. O R&R CURB MARLBORO PROP' MARLBOROUGH R0. l PROP � BDTTo mTr 1 — GFi ROAD —H— �±so.s_3 @� — 4. (TE cuge wax yo.Q I APRIL OF 1 P%^Op O P.G —p 110.000 m PROP R CURBOC .anA z� d mre I j w 194w0 "' +I R&R CURB Rk r po R' '0 ... PROP.,CEMENT CONIC. wx .�ia(R 15) .ss enm.� OPOS PROP. 2 CEMENT WHEELCHAIR RAMP ? I R SL CITY /"— .Tm PR EO 9 a 0 ID C. 51 ALK III f O O O ) O B �.°F r& U O Q4� oA�Ss PR BR. CONC. PROP. BR. CONIC. G a 1 O W I �j° WALK SURFACE WALK SUR E • & I a m PROP. BR. PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PRO . BCON R. O CONIC. BIT.DRIVEWAY LOAM BORRSEED NPROP. 100 mm MODIFIED 1 OW AND O PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT f0 LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. BR. CONC. ORNEWAY P P.C. DRIVEWAY DRNEWAY 9.1 m CEMENT /°O CONC. ORIVENAY .fir PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONIC. DRIVEWAY PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONC. ORNEWAY PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED i 10AA1 BORROW AND SEED PROP. BR. PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED LOAM BORROW AND SEED .n LOAM BORROW AND SEED CONC. ORNEWAY LOAM BORROW AND SEED •��•W. I �? I PROP. FIELDSTONE WALK PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONIC. ORNEWAY PROP. 100 mm MC DIFIED r�N a�^`• PROP. BIT. CONC.i ORNEWAY I LOAM BORROW ANDI SEED PROP. BR. CONIC. ORNEWAY PROP. BTT. CONIC. ORNEWAY' I / PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT I PROP; BIT. PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED CONIC. WgLK SURFACE PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT CONIC. ORA¢WAY CONIC. ORNEWAY LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED '. LOAM BORROW AND SEED m I i / LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON PROP. 2 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE o I I DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. 2 2 I P < s 8 a V SCALE IN METERS ` 0� � 1 25 - - ':EE SHEET N0. un.=.9CfiCl,Cr RCSU I I �y Zell ."OtH I w i n. •elrs MA 1 -0011 "j 103 PROJECT FLE No. 601321 GENERAL PL41N I I \ TOP OF PROP. SLOPE PROP. 100 mm MCCIFlED LOAM \\ \\ ! BCRROW AND SEED \\ PROP. 2 m CEMENT \ \ \ \ CONC. SIDEWALK \ \ ROP. 4.9 m CEMENT\ 1 CONC. DRNEWAY \ \ s \ yae� I a. I SLA �.w•jO V AV / A ax"v" PROP. 9.7 m CEMENT a s \ \ \\ CONIC. DRIVEWAYI PROP. BR. I \ \ \ CCC DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY I ROP. BIT. \ a�lwv. \s1 \ 1 CONIC. DRIVEWAY __s mm�.cx \ \\ PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROP. BIT. \\ \` LOAM BORROW AND SEED SLOPE I \\ CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP. 2 m CEMENT \ \ PROP CEMENT CONIC. j \ 7 I \ PROP. 4.9.m CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK \\ PR(P. FULL DEPTH C 9+STR+ \1 WHEELCHAIR RAMP p1yOP PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED LVA N CONC. DRIVEWAY - \ /- \ a p I BORROW AND SEED \ mans Z I 9 v "R \ PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED \\ \ OF \ LOAM BORROW AND SEED \ OAlON LINE •"* APRIL TOP PROPOSED OPE \\ ) c PROP\L OF 1940 {1 .ac• \ " „ISPI l aoa wmroa 0.100 ATION \ B 100 m �mm 90� E h a yEAENT .7\.2Bo Ort: 500 PROP. SAW CUf PROP. 95 mm ___-__--__ -- _ `\ __ F'[e67.654 rt` µ� BIT. CONIC. PAVEMENT TYPE I-I � _ LANE , 5.000 m +NOB'10'IOIY H_-___- PROP. ORAN CURB ` o x PROP. SAW CUf \ O�yDE 4 _ ---- PROP. E.g 18J.675 m --___D. 0$_ _ _ ++ \ CUBO Q 4 i 1oZB� m ns PROP. COLD P AND OVERLAY PROP. LBOROUGH RD. @� _.rj.,-P.0 3.826 _ __�_Ra2J2.000/[ -4- \ PROP, DE CURB TYPE VB rt MARLBOROUGH ROAD \\ PROAS COLD E AND OVERLAY 1 i `P. BOTTOM +pe - \\ ---- rt' O ` a•" <> nj Z a• 1 m w /1 SOF PROPOSED s'¢"- - _.---- �-- - '•yj 1 1 CI1Y'-'-eOno� \ VIACATION 1 _ o �s•sz p,,.• SLOPEIaa 1 9401 R&R FENCE \\ p ` \ m 111 uP 0 O 1 111 `l �• & GATE 1 I *!".�\.. .��. CO P. BR. AY O \ eayl{d ! \3 \�' CLOVERDA VE. 1 - 11, I eke •PROP 4. MENT \ ' STA. 0+14.328 — \ - �ie 1 •'•• •••-'•'••' •••�•• \ CONC OR eJ�'' \ • PROP. 06AENT CONICt4 . ;n PROP. BIT. 1 I w 1 \ :\ W �Cplp�p,Rj00 mm\ OD L 4 PROP. mm MODIFIED LOAM F y. CONIC. DRNEWAY e a BORROYYYWKKKLAND SEED \l \ �' sa 's BORROW h SEED\ s% a"a PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT °a."' _ V� 1 Rv�c> \\ \ �� f O `\ \ c+ CONIC. DRIVEWAY ` v.^4 PROP. BR. YY j PROP. 100 mm ACED 1 CONIC. DRIVEWAY Ope p;11 11 �,v,Ve^' `\ \ �y a ROP. 2 m �EMENT PINE BARK MULCH \ PROP, 4.9 m CEMENT ` rlei I \ \ ` INC. SIDEWA\J( PROP. CEMENT 1 CCNC. DRIVEWAY P.,e� P 1 11 \ \ `off \ rn C7 1 \ ROP. 9.1 �\L1 CEMENT - CONC. WALK `I PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED LOAM 1 1 \\ \\ DNC. ORNEW\Y PROP. 2 m CEMENT _ BORROW AND SEED %• 1 m CONC. SIDEWAJA— ~I 1 11 `\ \ `. \ PROP BR. Pj02•-CEIOEM CONIC. 1_ �'p0 1 1 \ \ \\ CONI. DRIVEWAY - --WHEELCHAJR RAMP 1 1 1 \ \ \ i m PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED LOAM \1 11 11 \\ \\ �^ L• 1\ \ I I BORROW AND SEED 1 \ \ ? \ \ ej i; 31 ml 1 NOTE- LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE - SCALE IN METERSDETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE 0� 5 10 15 202s ENGINEER. - -- _r,:.lrli:• _,:L-rl � I SHEET N0. uARlSGRCUGM 3CA0 � ilFi 9Iµ I `•` SfAT I i1D. •D•\ttlL�O `'�µ b 'fEIl9 PRCJECT FLE No. 601321 GENERAL PLAN BOTTOM OF FRCP. SLOPE III C i \ PROP. eB m CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY ' PROP, 100 mm VCCIFlEDE � I' '•_'� PROP. BIT. CONC. DRIVEWAY LOAM BORROW ANQ,SO PROP. BIT. PROP. 4,9-MI CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY I i C0�1 C:'9RNEWAY • ^ ^n PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP BITI I PROP' 2 m CEMENT PROP. BIT. va•, ACONC. DRIVEWAY . PAM BORROW AND SEED I y'"* I I CONC. ORIVEY/AY CONC. SIOEWgL1( PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED a r' BOTTOM OF PROP. SLOPE I I `.e. LOAM BORROW PROP. too m� MODITED LOAM BORROW AND SEED I '_ cau nnna as I PROP. 4,9 m CEMENT PROP. CRAM rE D SEED inArc -� PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED UI70� PROP, 100 Imr' MODIFIED CON DRIVEWAY CURB TYPE VS a�o� LOAM BORROW ANO SEED I �"'- I LCPM BORROW/N0 SEED PROP. 100 mm MOOIF7EDTOP OF PROP. SLOPE r nr I A° srt r ,L,4>4.80RRQ SEED PROP. 90 mm BIT.ICONC. y JO PAVEMENT TYPE 1-1 I "m eR&R WALL wnss .> / ' nI _ u,� xa;,., "9;•n.. 'P;.,,, p .. (��; Rh5 GUARD RAIL I II' 'uq,,,, m m -�L,w•� POSE SLOP_ / 8 _LL_cmr _ • pRnPnccn I REMOVE MAREBOROU H ROAD 7 PROP. SAW CUT PROP. GRAN CURB T P VB� PROP. COLD PLANE AND OVERLAY 5.000 to O— �- '— 26.667 +52.081 B +18.241 N4738'21'N— 13-6 3 m —PI �'- -�- -Cl- P.�- PROP. MARL00R UGN RD. d PROP. COLD PLANE C. R>.1000.000 m 1-25.404 •T.% N49'25'411V- 66.160 m AND OVERLAY PRO!,. 95 m BIT CONC. RD 5.000 m O1e1 A M N I- o __ OIA16 �1 xa•nw xa'+� - s °1 REA(IOVE i"O•QGo'vs iV ur TOO —�I - SLOP- O aa PROP. mCEMENT TOP OF CONC. DRIVEWAY Q �\ \ ,y`_ SE \ G CONC. WALK SIDEWALK 4°° ` r � � $H PROP, CEMENT PROP. BIT. REM 4 m 0 WOOD WALL, p0O` a p PROP. 2 m C ENT L a\ c z CONC. SIDEWALK GONG. DRIVEWAY r CON 1•B T GEMENT g GONG. SIOEW �ISV u H PROP. BR. PROP. 4.9 m CEME NEVI a CONC. DR AY .6 CON;,. DRIVEWAY qA 9 3 CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED + - LOAM BORROW AND SEED P. BR. GONG. '°'•c "n �: 9 +«,c PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT%,. "y W SURFACE CONC. ORPROP. 100 m MOOIF1 '" •r« DRIVEWAY c A LOAM BORR AND SEED TOP OF PROP. SLOPE �wr PROP. BR. moo.+ "m CONC. DRIVEWAY " c°"^+n, R 0 0 0 PROP. 100 mm MOOIFTED LOAM BORROW AND SE NOTE. LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON \ PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE \ DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE a g g ENGINEER. a e F SCALE IN METER`' 0 5 t0 15 25 ��s 3RACING 'o SEE SHEET N0. MAPL3C4Cl 1 ROAC isr aan air MA 2001 IJ /:1 PROJECT FILE No. 6013:1 j iGENERAL PLAN rpAINACE cun-7 LA_6rb2i LR) PROP. SERVICE CONNECTION @ 24M - 75 mm CONOUIT FLASHING WARNING BEACON TYPE D - \ \ 1 `\-,N PROP BO ANS MODIFIED \/ \ LOAM BORROWOW AND SEED / PROP. 2 m CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK PRCP DIECTM \ PROP.100O AGE DLOAM BORROW AND SEED PINE BARK MULCH (R&5) nPROP4.9mMENT :pl OF PROP. SIT.CONC DRIVEWAY p CONIC. DRIVEWAY / PROP. BR\ PROP. B CONC. ORNEIVAY �� PR P / „-CQ 0 p PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONIC. DRIVEWAY ,,"` `j / >S6,"o \ CONC. DRIVEWAY c \\/' R@S GUARD RAIL `9p0�/�// PROP. 4bgDRI m CEMENT Q „ CONIC. DRIVEWAY O e,'' / / / pN0 OVERLAY O \Opf PROP.100 mm MODIFIED ' WROENINCOP x / / ye' R OLD PUKE /� 8 ROP \\\A�O,y \\ LOAM BORROW M10 SEED CfjOF� PROP. SAW CUTJ - �� p / \a« R.108. 00 �m ` 1pR11\O pyg5pL F. eiTy \�\ \ TYPE VB CURB ® // PR�e� R rpt `J \ � CURB TYPE VS PROP. 2 m CEMENT -. CONC. SIOEW Q /' 6' 6��yY ,/ -- -��___ TEMP / EASEMENT ! �OA. \ 14 Rdi§ GLI h F.((I v�0B'AP" PROP. GRANITE CURB TYPE VS /R&S ED. 1 NE O PROP. DEMENTED SONE)MASONRY WALL, ``` \\ R+ a° �$\O \ OFq �i pPC'VO OxOQ O ''u PROP. 100 mm ODIFlED ETNL SMi NO. \ \ 'Pq LOAM BORROW 0 SEED 10s PROP. BR. yy.79Oy nt / PROP. 2 m CEMENT CONIC. SIOEWNJC PROP LL PTH RECON CONC. DRIVEWAY 6 Q \.(q STA 6 45+/L TO STA 9+25 +/- ,�pJi✓ AOR PROP. GRANITE BOUND - PLAIN / COVO O•-/gV60 RQ,SN'0 y'9 PROP. CEMENT GONG. WHEELCHAIR RAMP %. 6 "° I Jpoaf, ey, ' PROP. 9.1 m CE \ J� ti 0 S / ` S CONIC. DRIVEWAY \ J SOQG, E1 s. q JNC�� 1 PROP. 2 m CEMENT b4 yF I/(,C \ CONIC, SIDEWALK w` \ \ tl C PROP. CRANfiE CURB �« CYJ�N i y xvaw^"4`� �� \ \\ z u H 0.pQ TYPE VB \ O f wti PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED �♦ \ a a3., `\°CJ,yO \ _ �` LOAM BORROW AND SEED O\ S OF \ V ` TDP \ LIMIT OF tl \ ` PROP. GRANIT'EEBDlpgppT ��. sfO \ \\ PROP. 100 mm OOIFlEq VISTA ®V \ LOAM BORROW AND SEEO?" TA. 0 6.200 �� \ "'' \ \ PROP.GWWffE \ PROP. 2 m CEMENT CON SIOEWALIc \ CURB 11PE VB e4S'f4;, E•\ } PROP. 1.6 m BIT. CONIC. WALK SURFACE \ `\ PROP. mm MODIFIED \ LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP. 8R\ONC. WALK SURFACE \ PROP. CEMENT CONC. PROP.100 mm AGED WHEELCHAIR RAMP a+� PINE BARK MULCH c. t 3,. -I:31 t NOTE: / LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON \ PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE \ s 6 DETERMINED IN THE FiELD BY THE < 3 o u SCALE IN METS ENGINEER. 0« 1� is 25 -h vJ. wCNF. MTRL30..-C'L'GN RCAO SEE SNEEi N0. '• I Wert mx,n mol.0 MA 2001 -� I PROJECT FILE N0. 60132I I GENERAL PLAN 1'1 ...—.n •..e uu.. I I u i.w....m n `•A 1: 4 gmvl I \ li I PROP. 9.1 m CEMENT \ CONC. DRIvEWAY PROP. 14 m CEMENT pftOP. 100 mm MODIFIED \ PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED CCNC. DRIVEWAY IBCRROW AND SEED I 1 LOAM BORROW AND SEED I PROP. BIT CONC. OR Y LOAM PROP. BR. PROP. CEMENT CONIC. W PROP. BRICK WALK PROP. 100 mm ACED CONC. DRIVEWAY - PINE BARK MULCH PROP. a.9 m CEMENT I PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT CON-0 PROP. BR. CONIC. WALK CONIC. DRNEWAY PROP. 2 m CEMENT PROP. 2 m CEMENT - I t no CONIC. SIOEWt1J( DET E MINE O IN FIE TO BE CONC. SIDEWALK PROP. BR CONIC. DRNEWAY DETERMINED IN FIELD) xw.m r1.wrtA RE OVE Lin O PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED CURB TYPE VB PROP. GRANITEnT 5 9 9 cw' awu LOAM BORROW AND SEED e,mm B D 5 'W.—LOCATION'.— PROPOSED PROP.CRANffE S im�,•. QSE 1 ye47 m �� N•Jee'c TTY - a — 'e- —Z- —!I / LOPE —_ CURB TYPE VB APRIL .. �"� _ ... �. — —— LME SAW CU PRO GRANITE CURB TYPE VB I+5_ 1,000 m PROP. COLD PLANE AND.OVERUY 10 24. 6� —F— P.C. R.135. 00 m L-27.1764 �0/F N29.20'I +48.169—F. -- — — tJ NI9.30.02 E—o--104.457 m MARLBOROUGH ROAD m P T' '1Y RAJ m R�5 m .000 m PROP. SAW CUf x'087 m +95.647 Ti ROP. 5.00 m z �P� PROP. MARLBOROUGH RD. @ 5.000 m $ E 5.000 m .5 mg SAW C 0 ° N ——— — PROP. 95 mm BR. CONIC. PAVEMENT TYPE I-1 —— — — — —— deR _ _ 5.000 m e• _T .000 o o R�5 5.000 m u vzi o+ __ 10118 / s1Prt rnrz rn.as ero t .e (R&R) PROP. CENP e0 1 • - vu.a ,� wAa CONIC. W 1 y 4 m s� c PROP. GRANITE CURB TYPE VB 2 g OP coc - w E END PROP. CURB Pf✓,OP. 100 mm -001PP11 E L MIT OF WORK L BORROW AND EED • I �"• _ _ ED mlhnn I SCENIC AVENUE PROP. BR. CONIC. OR AY paoPos �,,, o,� I LIMIT OF WORK 2. m m n 26$B TOP OF 2! Rea c STA. 0+20.000 PROP. m CEMENT I III PROP. CEMENT N xF CONIC. SIDEWALK OUTLOOK AVENUE - 1.917 In LINE �_______EASEMaT CONIC. SIDEWALK T �T- r ailm�t•^a•v••�•v°^ STA. O ,I5.000 _ I°Ir�n I PROP. GRANITE e i6O PROP.1.6 m CEMENT rwe+ta n n PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT I I E Lxj E I� PROP. CEMENT PROP. GRANITE CURB TYPE CURB TYPE `A3 CONC. DRIVEWAY CONIC. SIDEwWNX m a° CONIC. SIDEWALK `f T f w �� PROP. CEMENT PROP. CEMENT C C. WPLK I I I PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED r.r s•u a a.. �C¢ I �> CONIC. SIDEWALK t 0I�•! I ^ Y..I I PROP. 2 m CEMENT PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT I `� I PROP. 2 m CEMENT LOAM BORROW AND SEED 1 I PROP. CEMENT CONIC. I I CONIC. ORNEWAy •.1..D ..r Tn.•u. _x1 WHEELCHAIR RAMP—J CONIC. SIDEWALK @ PROP. 2 m CEMENT PROP. 100 mm AGED i CONIC. SIDEWALK CONIC. SIDEWALK PINE BARK MULCH PROP. CEMENT CONIC. PROP. CEMENT CONIC. D I PROP. CEMENT CONIC. I Z I WHEELCHAIR RAMP. WHEELCHAIR RAMP � j I WHEELCHAIR RAMP - PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROPOSED CITY LOCATION LINE PROP. 100 mm M DIFIED W Q LOAM BORROW ANIJ SEED I U I I I I LOM/ BORROW AND SEED N I I L— I I neo 4 Aw+s . . • . Mv.1t 'J.Wn1 r.'1 � 9 �p I O I I O 31 I I I I i. NOTE. I I � LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON " ' I PRIVATE PROPERTY TO B "aE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE I Y ENGINEER. = a2 SCALE IN METERS 0 5 10 16 I0 25 SHEET NO, MARLBCRCLGH ?CJD i i Firs i •a i wxn PROJECT FILE No. 601321 GENERAL PLAN 1 ,t I LSTL I1+sat :E7 Ic j 1 PROP. m CEMENT 1 "n x„�a I I �A4LxA CONC.ISIDEWALK n sxna PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT BE ff y,,,iwxv wa PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED DRIVEWAY (LOCATION TO DETERMINED IN THE FIELD) PryOP. 4.9 m CEMENT CONC. i LOAM BORROW A740 SEEDL ` ` 0(iVAY (LOCATION TO BE Nc EVA IN THE FIELD) PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED / PROP. GRANITE LOAM BORROW AND SEED I JxiC PROP. 4.9 m CENEM CONC. ORN•EW4Y BOTTOM II CURB TYPE VB OF— PRDPPO�_ a••T \ rd/ I I (LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN TH'i FIELD) - - - — T - - - - — - - - - - - - — - -' I ILIOAPRIL_ L 1940 PROPOSED O»__ CITY LOCATIONI —____.goP D� 5.000 0 +9564311 PROP. 95 mm BR. CONIC. PAVEMENT TYPE W R&S GUARD RAIL v '^ PROP. GRANITE CURB TYPE _ PROP. 95 mm BR. CONC. PAVEMENT TYPE I'1 +60.646 r p N29'20'12•E~ 86.083m T,, +63.eas ARLBOROUGH R _ +13.e01 ,, �_ / s4.e4imm — p `�' E„R>• 'm — PROP. COLA PLANE AND OVERLAY 0 P;t' �— Ra6OD.W0 L�49.916 m Q— ROP UTJ N25'45S �� PSE AND OVERLAY 5.000 3 PROP. MARLSOROUG ROAD 4 1 •� s i _�.—_ pvfW _ III '� I IL `A' 0m 1940 r'7y — -- (RhR LOCATION NE I 0 I awc a* a„a axa a 7 'W.LSS j J wIItt a m °m^•^ )_� aAss °C � R&R) AOPw - g 2.507 m PROP. 9.1 m ,DIT j ��x CONC. DR Y O Aty — 1 PR Go Ep—/'O PROP CUYPE VB ROP. CEN 1 PROP. BR. PROP. BR. EI n PROP. BR. '''��I'''"”" onrn+a xtl I I 1 pR �CONC. DRIVEWAY CONC. ORNEW PR . 100 MODIFIED �Iri n IMIT OF WORK CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP. COBBLESfON F PROP. Ayn PROP. 4.9 CEMENT PROP. 4.9 m ENT I WALK TOP Of PROP. SLOE L 0 WAND SEED a hel UTLOOK AVENUE Y la CONC. OR AY CONIC.. Da1VEw w do. PROP. BIT. PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED u/, PROP. 2 m CEMENT +n TA. 0+15.000 PROP. CEMENT ONC. PROP. 100 mm M IFlED PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED CONC. SIDEWALK ySIDEWALK CONC. DRNEWAY I LOAM BORROW ANDS i raw Y e I PROP. 2 m CQAENT up i,x;v,xx. ca a„,x. LOAM BORROW ANO SEED t LOAM BORROW AND SEED $ I CONC. SIDEWALK a.xx°a'"'"xa„ ROP. CEMENT OP. r.a.... PROP. 16.0 m BR. PROP. BR. W I SIOEWALN ENT CONC. CONC. DRIVEWAY CONC. WALK CONC. ORNEWAY s PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED PROP. 11.0 m CEMENT A Q ' a�II.,,�A:.xwn° LOAM BORROW AND SE� I CONC. DRIVEWAY PROP. CEMENT CONC. - 1 Y WHEELCHAIR RAMP I O PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED OBDI7R"5w—ANU_aEO `m+�• _j f O 11 o. ?. o. •'• I I xF yin., '. i. I xao*•wa 1 S s E o SCALE IN METERS a S t0 ISS VJ. .4I'- -- 4o.:L .4 C, qCN7 I 3HCET 4G. ..vn r.rt rm..o rvo<xn '•u� I�.w MA j:GUI PRCJECT FILE No. 601721 GENERAL PLAN I - - L OTL NGE OUTLET \AF• LSTA 133+033 LL We —1 I <E I i j I II r- � I I I r.:.•�w.n., I •PROP. GRANITE PROP. 100 mm MCOIFlED —PRC'. 4.9 m CEMENT CURB TYPE VB LOAM BORROW AND SEED CON . DRIVEWAY PROP. 2 m CEMENT 9, „•Yen PROP. BR. - I— I CONC. SIDEWALK ENT CONC. CIDEWALK URB TYPE VB CoNC. ORNEWOYC. DRIVEWAY PROM. OR W MCISEED T PROP. BIT. PROP PROP. LOW CEMENT CONCRETE RETAINING WALL LOAM BORROW AND SEED I CONC. BIT.DRIVEWAY PROP. GRANITE PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT PROP. CEMENT CCNC, PROF. a.9 m CEMENT A r, I WHEELCHAIR RAMP CONC. DRIVEWAY . BR. CONC. DRIVEWAY BOTfO OF PROP. SLOPE PROP. OR m MODIFIED N PROP. 100 ORRO m MODIFIED PRC CEMENT P ROP. 4.9 m CEMENT LOAM BORROW D SEED LOAM'SORROW ANO SEED CONC lY� tREMOVE DNC. ORNENAY Cxr o.•x.x " W I LIMIT OF ORK (ROP. 100 mm MODIFIED BOTTOM OF PROP. SLOPE- 'a•r<,*7 r PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT_ PROP. 100 m MODIFIED I �• ( HOME ST EET LOAM BORROW AND SEED PROP, 700 mm MODIFIED r. OAA1 CO C. DRNEWAY O z n L BORROW AND SEED LOAM BORROW AND SEED - N7T32'49�N & STA. 0+15000 I '^^•w<.x,��x n "'•�>*wn<�.,,�•a P. BR. 20.000' m = I [ u " PROP. a.9 m CEMENTw�•' " CONC. ORNEWAY PROP. B17. MEET IX120. BERM '•w.w,. <+•�..M.x„ REMOVE I c vxu. CNC. DRIVEWAY CONC. DRIVEWAY as PROP. CEMENT CONC. Q gg � PRO . 2� CEMENT (R&@ FENCE) PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT WHEELCNNR P N7 I H CON SIDEWALK ROP. BR. PRAM. 100 mm MODIFIED ' /m CONPROP C. DRNEWAY I � CONC: DRIVEWAY LONA BORROW AND SEED a a I I I I CEMENT/B 0, I a m CONP. CRL4 •n-- OTTOM C C W (R8R) i' -\ ) I / 1REM ) i CURB a G E VB I RE OVE— PROP. EMENT Ar Rd3l I �� E 1-1 S�p OB1 r�N c PR .a SLO z, 'Tkll' w.ss I CONC. ALK cn N - 'CEMENT r83 e m E MAW a a rJ >� w"s CP CONC. PA SpW 1}1 m fte2 o z rz C 000 PROP gg m - ,r o ITY = TOP OF PRO SLOPE wr g5•^ m BR- .14 $N PAVEMENr TYPE BR; xI< n <r a dr x.e PROP UGN R0. 8.',1•Q� MPR 33- AVER N2,5 '42• _i, PROP. CPANRE CURB TYPVB -5 m ^ (RGR - ""^ ftANRE PROP' �g2R�0 E2µO 1A p, G 74 ` g 1 PIAN 3.000 p Op. 9$ mm BR. PRO 00 VB 7B -L-1�y'N OIA m PR R.1 13 a TYPE C 9 oP, i z2aoo—+— � 90, S A$LBO GH OAD ufte t. P. -� SAW CUr m L�22257 '-'� 905 �+10.107 PROP. SAW C PAVEMENT TYPE 1-1 C m P.T. +a9.547y_ 32 ROP. COLD PLANE pAND OVERLAY .369 N 8'S2'E— 56.637 m � =•1 � $L,GP >•ztyy /R Rldi Asp, w9.>Ki.s�R rt. OVE O .000 m e.5iga0 a OVERUY CONC. WALK PFOP "' ° Tao —� mx� lIM1T OF WORK.�— , .d w ra �s -� SLOPE EET IXISf. hT T �� PROPOSED Pb'i < GF ROCKDALE AVE. CDfte R E E ^ SLOPE M SLO PROP. PG n, STA O 0 75'20'S7•E BOTTOM OF ° °t �� I or..a- +1 n m O - . �.,� FENCE v PROP. 4.9 m C m ++ ac,„, PROP. SLOPE a aua -uma �4.TA2 oI •zm 20.000 e ri •� mxe P R. 3.877 tee. II +en avAa o CO RNEWAY I I PROP. IOb•mIn MODIFIED APRT 1 I U E /• UM I _ I w LO:op BI RRO } CONC. ORNEWAY L Q 1 PLOP. B CO PRO . CUR81 `r one PROP. EMI PROP. CEM CONC.� s WALK SU FACE E E LIMIT OF WORK I CONC. WALK WHEELCHrNR P W PROP. 100 mm PROP. 100�mm MODIFIED �11pPROP. B CONC. PROP. 4.9 m C MEM °� I m n PROP. 2 m CEM J J $$ m I SABLE ROAD MODIFIED LOAM PROP. 100 mm LOAM BORROW AND SEED WALL( SURFACE CONC. OR AY I m I .•. zIn I BORROW ANO SEED MODIFIED LOAM CONG. SIDEWAL% I O IP. .; s STA. 0+15.000 PROP. 4.9 mI CEM PROP. 1 mm O IIFlED ^ w PROP. 4.9 BORROW AND SEED`, y CONC. OR AY LOAM BOR OW AND.SEED I & I m " / a COIL. ORNEWAY •�°`°"••w, j / O PROP. BR. xe.r A xn '°'"'+e;.u OP' FLAG NE WALK •n I N ""'+L"I a"<t—«r s w. PROP. eR. APRIL 1940 CITY LOCATION cr CONIC. DRIVEWAY <fix' �'<°° u�z m E 1,xi PROP. BRICK WALK CONC. ORNEWAY LINE ' / PROP. 2 m CEM PROP.PROP. BR. I PROP. CEMENT GONG. H g PROP. 2 m CEMENT • GONG. SIOEWALK CONC. ORNEWAY I WHEELCHAIR RAMP H w 13 CONC. SIDEWALK PROP. CEMENT PROP. BR. CONC.I LL! PROP. CEMENT CONC. CCNC. SIDEWAL% I WALK SURFACE ZVREECCWIIR--WOAD DO a I PROP. MODIFIED ?: Z. i; y; I V) I IOALOAMBOROR BORROW PNO i I I a. LOCATION OF PROPOSED TREES ON .. PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. SCALE IN METERS . . 0 S t0 DRAINAGE TRAFFIC SiGNAL !:CNCUIT SS GRADING - .,_Sm SEE SHEET NO. SEE SHEET N0. - �— ':ONE — MARLSORGUGH ROAD SEE SHEET NO. mcK vm mrw nArz rm.xo eaoi xo. r�,x .n �rs i MA 2001 IL 10 PR0.IECT'FlLE No. 601321 GENERAL PLAN i L1I PROP. CEMENT PROP. BIT. CONIC. DRIVEWAYCONIC. WALK ` \ all PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED MEET EXISTING BERM ° k CONIC. DRIVEWAYIOPAI BORROW AND SEED \p = ° TOP OF PROP.SLOPE PROP. BR. CONC. DRIVEWAY eO LOAM BORROW AND MODIFIED � PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT \40Y pROP. CEMENT O` CONIC. DRIVEWAY . I j PROP. LOW CEMENT dao.r, xn M \ CONC. WALK 4 CONE RETAINING WALL a Mtery,x x ° - PROP. 2 m CEMENT R&R FENCE °`�. \ �t PROP. CEMENT CONIC. CONIC. SIDEW I PROP. OR mm MODIFIED LURB RANITE E WHEELCHAIR RAMP PROP. C ITE a ^' LOAM BORROW AND SEEDPE VBCURB TYPE VB COO. SIDEWALKP. CEMENT CO x1o .° 3.305(R&R ELCHAIR RAMP"' :M 'OPROP.CEMENT CONIC. R OF PROPLIMIT OF WORK WHEELCHAIR RAMPEM xn a 8 GRANCURB 7,�p,MVB SOUTH STREET nESTA. 0+10.700 ®r ` PROP. GRANITE CURB TYPE VA4 ' REMOVENr �FpLAY PROP. 95 mm ABN. CONIC. PAVEM NT TYPE I-1 5.0 • .000 mpRQ.O01 giR'2��0."0M."� + 574 PROP. MARLBOROUGH . P R�5 pI m m 5 .000 mL=43391 m O 5 'c e� PROP I .105 m +1 Q m +92 398 SAWCUT 1 25 +16.932 �;;�' N o REMOVE ARL80 OUGH �5 ROAD a'a7s.000 m L-27. 0 m P-r+— 4'J9' 0157 R�5 R OVE . Q gar. K A •' RE A\ 15.225 m . _xaa.aa° g I A= R a PROP. BIT. m„ & � APR L 1940 CITY CA VN L PROP. EM N aA r CEM CONIC. WALK SURFACE I w aN xi o LIMB OMC. WALK BOTTOM OF PROP. SLOE `\ m a I auo� a.ay _ ROP. 100 mm MODIFIED \ _ T `T ' PROP. 2 m EMENT ROP. 10 m MODIFIED I E E 20 000'57 1 S. PROP. CEMENT CONIC. CONIC. mm I u. CAM 80R(tOW AND SEED \ _ I 2D.000 m p 1� mm MODI WHEEICNAIR RAMP PROP. 100 mm�MODIFlED e 4 LC BORROW AND SEED r xe CONIC. WNJ(� x.,.a x, LOAM BORROW AND SEED p'ROP. CEM ti P p CEMENTI PROP. 1GO mm MODIFIED CONO. SIDEWALK I LOAM BORROW AND SEED i Q I C C. WALK PROP. CEMENT COOP. WALK LU I PROP. CEMENT CONIC. CONIC. WALK WHEELCHAIR RAMP PROP. IGO mm MODIFIED -j 3 PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED LOAM B RROW AND SEED Q PROP. 100 mra� MODIFIED LOAM BORROW AND SEED ENO OF P OJECT I LOAM BORROW D SEED PROP. CEME `1 PROP 2 m CEMENT PROP. BIT. CONC. WALK MARLBORO GH ROAD ri U CONC� SIDEWALK CONC. DRIVEWAY STA. 15+14.305 „a PROP. 100 mm MODIFIED I U PROP. CEMENT PROP. 4.9 m CEMENT LOAM BORROWI AND SEED N 918436 51 5 f CONC. DRIVEWAY CONIC. SIDEWALK --L� E 247149 180 PROP. CE NT CONC. PROP. DR m CEMENT WHEEL R RAMP CONIC. DRIVEWAY BOTTOM PROP. SLOPE i PROP. mm MODIFIED I LOAM ORROW AND SEED P. m CEMENT -� c: is is m: CONC DEW' . - NOTE: LOCATION Of PROPOSED TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. a $ v � 8 SLUE IN METERS - 0 5 10 15 20 25