The URL can be used to link to this page

28 GOODHUE ST - PLANNING 28 GOODHUE ST., SITE PLAN REvIEW It UV X T 3f WXii IN Vle -ol .ep" rM 01 E �0 0-1 A ENIga ; V, / *of I 1122: 1 1 gGRIMP0.419 1 .. e CANAL wenn+- •. ,�yS52afE sv,� _,e !� 1�� RIVER F,:° 4V aT' ��!°. " -�Nu-, NORTH 'a. a NOTES 6TY GENERAL NOTES 1. ZONING DISTRICT.' NORTH RIVER CANAL CORRIDOR I sbsToo'E � '� � � : NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT WRCC) 2. ASSESSORS MAP 16 LOT 372 G PART MAP 15 LOT 300 I .- , , _6 1) THIS PLAN /S THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD3. DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 22202 PAGE 393 SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PR/VA TE PLANS 4. EASEMENTS AGREEMENTS ETC. NOTED /N ABOVE ° --- s DEED ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2 U77LI77ES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND 5. THE ENTIRE LOCUS/S SHOWN NANELTHIN FLOOD ZONE A. a 8A to ) RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICA 77VE OF FEMA FLOOD MAP FROM A, PANEL 1, AUG 5, 1985 I 6. PLAN DATUM TAKEN FROM ABOVE FLOOD MAP, RM 6 UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS 7, LOCUS LOT AREA ((2 PARCELS): 79,031t 5F. , e. STREET LINE/S APPROXIMATE J) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVA77ON OF ALL / EVS71NO URLPIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, +� PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED +� IN WRI77NG.OF ANY U7/U77ES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL AC77ON j BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4) THIS PLAN /S BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS DEEDS AND THE RESULTS OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DA 7E. d; NO CERTIFICATION IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY 777LE OR AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS 5) THE OWNER SHALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULA77ONS GOVERN/NG THE MATERIALS AND/OR is METHODS OF INSTALLATION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN. ,p° DRAWING INDEX Or i / '" , SHEET C-1 EXS7/1VG CONDITIONS PLAN ce0 i SHEET C-2 SITE LAYOUT PLAN SHEET C-3 S77E GRADING k UTILITY PLAN uP2 SHEET C-4 SITE DETAILS CLAYMAN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP �� ro SURFACE E CRUSHED L E G E N D CONCRETE RUBBLE / BRICK AO g B(WALLS TVH EN6PNG DMANHOLE Q SMN ENIS➢NG SEWER MANHOLE ..'•4 ONLY) ® DMX E%IBI CATCH BAy DRAIN MANHOLEN EASPNG HYDRANT y p WSPNG WATER GATE / POLE LIGHT ON POST '+ ° Ip oM. SALEM WATER WORKS Q� 6 \ ... . L--_� CURB ,., ------ FENCE \ n \ � PAVEMENL�� BeH SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN •ttys. o2q,, , NoTE: • N2 S[Ey_n S 6 SOOT TEM.PORARv a30• cHAwuNKFENCE Ru.Is NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM w Po ALONG PERIMETER OE 51rE a1°a22, A • * SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS O 0" °.w = Tom— � Bezaca pert'NOS,, E EXISTING CONDITIONS 0. -ALA Nm 18.20-E 7015'' N05Pared Fol reaaredBy. 10 °`ow _�a North R/ver Condom/nium, LLC Eastern Lord Survey Assoe, 1ne r a+.mrt arse'� + - 282 Bennington St. Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. °\w East Boston MA 02/28 104 LoWe/l St. Peabody MA 01960 �+ (978) 531-8121 c\° ilWxpyi "e„1i[ur en �m . .m STREET SCI' 20' r, � . HUE h 1r C.i�7 O 0 10 20 40 - 60 /L BENCHMARK DA IF `� JANUARY 1.T, 2006 LFn pp xM'tlle HYDRANT SPINDLE x F 13879 ELEVATON 16.21 /\ REVISIONS S SHEET NO. f.t z NMARCH 22 2006 06 C 1 i IVE CANAL — NOTES: RIVER R s�ssz'ArE !1.aa NORM 1. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED --- SITE LIGHTING 6610p'E 6,,0 -- / 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS 3. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE papa I _ 1 CONDITIONS OF A VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ON OCTOBER 17, 2006. 4. PROPOSED LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF INDICATED i r 1 r IMPROVEMENT. 5. ALL DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL /r I CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 6. PARKING SPACE STRIPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH WHITE REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT. / r c'�\e �- 20 1 5CUNo 4R� doe ,i '&L % � sc ! HORIZONTAL DESIGN TAKEN FROM PLANS BY '�^,� smsr // _ JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE & ASSOCIATES, INC./ I I N 4MFLLINE IM1R i 9 _ J53 6 // pLT,Wgy� /J `°°°g w SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN Iss NAN A.sr) l� „I NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM s,�,,,w , PLAZA �i�r T �� ♦ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS \ - I / SITE LAYOUT PLAN ,Tn coysT __ --.� �\ PMO COI OUn N,. G+CW 9!bN c.- I a F,-- �- 58' >�\ ,y-0 5aT O,, aR!Ny repared For -�'ES URO 01 E T 5 Nos' Tao" y r s r IIEW SiD["LK P %spored BX. North River Condominium, LLC Eoslem Land Surrey Assoc., /nc 20:'0 a, 282 Bennington SL Christopher R. Me110 P.LS ,;59 a0 N t, y 104 Lowell St. Peabody MA 01960 } East Boston MA 02128 (978) 531-8121 SCALE 20 1 STREETt'' � { GOODHUE �7 �/�_"0 10 20 00 60 F 13879 DATE \ JANUARY 13, 2006 CnriPsfaM J)McNe SHEET N0. REVISIONS LLSS 1. MARCH 22 2006 C-2 2. NOVEMBER 15, 2006 1 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES SITE NOTES us Ise" e 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING 1. DEMOUTION SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL I.ss° / AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION APPUCABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. DEMOLITION MATERIAL WN ON SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A UCENSED FACILITY. WETTING _, \ ( OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. SHOWN OR NOT SHO SHALL BE USED FOR DUST CONTROL DURING THE DEMOLITION PHASE �I` \ THESE PLANS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE \ ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY 2 EXISTING PAVEMENT ON SITE SHALL BE CRUSHED AND RECYCLED \ _ UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED AS BASE COURSE FOR NEWLY PAVED AREAS / 9 90 sxaW �� .e CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION 3, NEW SIDEWALKS SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. -9 BEFORE PROCEEDING MATH THE WORK. 4. FINISH GRADING BETWEEN PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND/OR / g 35 o 9 FENCED CONCRETE 2) TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT $HALL BE HEAT CONTOURS SHALL FOLLOW A CONTINUOUS GRADIENT. / I� a PATCHED. 2 0 S. EXISTING CURB WITHIN DSTREET TO BE REALIGNED SHALL ( 3) ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED BE RE-USED OR RETURNED R THE CITY, AT THE DIRECTION OF s " ,J THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. / 8 <e,.eG� DUCTILE IRON PIPE. AND SIZED BY ARCHITECT. BAYS EA pAe,o,ES 4) EXISTING SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE �ss° �A INSPECTED TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR REUSE OR REPLACEMENT. ° 'J E2!5, Hi' 5) WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MIN- IMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED WHERE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES CROSS / / $ ° // / 9• / � 6) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE 12= HOPE PIPE EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. i �� 7) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH BASINS TO DRAIN MANHOLES SHALL BE .003 FEET PER FOOT. 6v \ / Z 8) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AND POLE RELOCATION SHALL ��+ % r„ 9•s° j a Z� COMPLETED AS PER SPECIFICATIONS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY. pA'" 9) GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED !`pe' H 4 -W UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. °j E~0� 10) PROPOSED 8 INCH SEWER SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING 0 g;is lxP, \ SESD MANHOLE IN A MANNER TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTH WWW \� ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT. 10 SHOP DRAWINGS OF THE BAYSAVER UNIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED w.zs \ \ 9.15 w,O / PRIOR TO COIATELY SIZE FJHT OF CONSNCTITE OF THE UNIT. FEPfiOPuPPLR ELooR - _ MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE BAYSAVEP- SYSTEM Py 0 OSEO 6DM1DING i '\ AN APPROPRIATELY SIZED STORMCFPTOR WA QUALITY M1 Si° GEII ` 0 � 2 1 \ ----------------- TABLE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE L E G E N D �•'i / ELEVATIONS ] w .r. .STRUCTURE RIM INVERT LT �M. Ir AI VM'Hnc CBSN 1 9.25 7.10 s .;N� EFIS'1 CACN 3A4rrL AS IG HRANT CBSN 2 9.50 6.85 w; r�POLE ER CA TE , ,• ... SALE DMH 3 9.60 8.75 �_ ON POS m , \ ww SALEM WATER wCRKS \�5 _ ,G ■ -zE \ / :u \\ CBSN 4 9.50 7.00 _ ARB Q� 3``T / ■- 1 \ - - \(D \ P CBSN $ 9.00 6.75 • SMH PROPOSED SE'AER.MANHOLE O \ • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE ■ i1 DMH 6 9.68 6.3$ S(152 • PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 9`50 \ 6.60 (12"U 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR / WONO PROPOSED SPOT GRADE CBSN 7 8 .50 6.10 '\ \ PROPOSED LIGHT BUILDINK' 1 \ CBSN 8 - 8.50 6.10 —S— PROPOSED SEWER \ PROPOSED BAYSAVER I BAYSAVER \ \%` \ \\`•I MANHOLES 8.90 5.70 (15:) —D PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 1 GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION=MS /, n 5.95 (12 —w— PROPOSED WATER UNE I W . 3 ) / I', 1; ' ' G // SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN S,_C,. s-�[ c WabRMK_A ca N. / w= s 50 Ta Bnd9w street NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM gT00. E'E I SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS \ = J - •_ NEW SIDEWPLK _— \ SITE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN \ -_--- -- - Prep PAM,e s°R ss Pvc _ Syy9 ° PN01M Fw East" Bic North Rlvar Condominium, LLC Eastom Land Survey .L.S. Ina ChrfsfophR. Mello 282 Bennington SL 104 Lowell St PeabodyLMA 01960 E.wzs n ik G"— � s 5r emu sEwEA —� East Boston MA 02126 (978) 5J1 8121 SCALE �. j+ T I-= 20' / 4.J GOD HUE -� \\ \ \ SO SON} I o +0 z0 eo Eo �r• Da TE (57') N .k (Io') JANUARY 1J 2006 NrfAyher'R.Mn awylu-A-Mdm PLS JIJ17 vE]a%9 SHEET N0. R AR 1. MS 1. MORON 22 2006 C-33 —3 Z NOt'SVBER 75, 2006 _ DETAIL DETAIL STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAILMANHDLE CATCH BASIN TRENCH SECTION TRENCH SECTION no stole no scale °O BC°IO no state no scale 24'01".NANHCIE FRANK AND LOVER UENECK U,l OA LABELLED DRAIN 2A.A,u.CAS<Na,iRAMEµp°,pR2 UNPnuEO L(BARLx NL I"6R III I24 PAYED UNPAYFA PFIR NI. eea $kT 1 1/4•eDlfl'PAMXO ' 4 PAK9 R9 Weiv BM D "LOW 6 SEED P. FXAYBALE 2 I. 5 Cw/us LeWin9 0,i<M R le$ew/ea IMeq elY •LOW k Yd UNIT NCH O PRECAST CONCRETE CONE [OMPACTO D ' CCA OF cw- oO a e.aFAL cauPACTm ExcAVAnax- uo rc TRENCH EAptNL PRNDWE shorn PRECAST CONCRETE WALL SECTION PRmA$T WNCIETE OR ENL,LyATIDN- AND SHORING AS `) (All Joinle m,tl PenelmVOAf B'VNFl SLOCK BRILLS PRI SHEETNc a EW11fE0 TE (YORT/R J°Nl$IF BYdF1 ,. ND 91dfINc AS LOCLL COMgnMS. to Ee meEa IUIIY y''alerti9Mi :'0•INSIDE OMN' OLCIX USED) REWIRED 0Y (RO"T-I I ONA TEMPORARY III 'EAR. LOCA,CONDIngS. ODQ STEEL PIAIE 0 e FORGED ALUMINUM ALLOY LRNN O po A Q O B'GONG,BLOCK 5nY ATSAFETY YEO.LNNCQE 1"T� FORe o p0 2 O,N.p OTOrmusom) 0.8' 8 6 (TYP) N F=Rrr ND. —ancr °^ �/ o^ e W Ea0rA1FIR I e ACO A (e'IN 1£OCEI AA A JD A A - ,As CC pAo p AO o 1 INLET 19•Ie, STONE dC0 h'onoo. NAYBALE 5•unl RN I SNNE h� pEi 5 MIKE wAW. TEMPORARY STEEL PUTE s-so WATER MAIN J/:STONE PRFCA51 COxCRETE BASE 8 So. PRECAST OR,usr-N-wAa TRENCH SECTION I own.Stme BRICK I.oART L°"°LEIE BASE no =10 Fwmoew e•oMSIm stunt FouxDAnw CATCH BA9N yNPAK➢ DETAIL PALED EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE LOW 2" a OL.BOm°I POSTS A SUED EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM DETAIL _ ARPIT xa loo... UWi61KdO1 CONTROL FA0RK I. STAKED HAY BALES. SILT FENCE. IEMPORAY DIVERSION SWAlES AND SEDIMENT C'ONPACTED EYCAxAROM- BASINS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PLAN OR AS OTIIER'MSE HANDICAP CURB RAMP eAlxmL PAND EN RIIEETNc HAY BAIFs DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OR THE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DL ONES As N.T.S. a- REwNED By FtOw gREcnox Loc.M cq,gnoxs. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION L BE KEPT N ADDITIONAL HAY BALES AND R FT. OF SILT FENCE SHALL BE KEPI ON SITETOR FOR (xaclO (EAR FASTWc cRwrvO REPAIRS OR OTTER EROSION CONTROL NEEDS. THE PETER SHALL mL INSPECT EROSION CONTROL FACILITES WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT TO CONFIRM THAT SAME ARE PROPERLY FUNCTIONING. ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE EROSION CONTROL FACILITES SHALL BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY. JACROSS WALK e 2. ALL SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION. J. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH FILTERS, AS SHOWN HEREON a'fR'w hmcn UNTIL NO SEOIMMT TRANSPORT IS NSIBLE DURING RAINFALL EVENS, FILTERS WATIR NAw -_1111 --1111 SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY. o iEJfcT eAanu _ 4. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION _ 0$TONE a S 1111= III — DxgsNl®m aeDRAPE SHALL CONFORM WITH THE MASSACHUSETTS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL pNS (BROOM FINISH -- �� _1111 oIIII GUIOWNES, URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREAS'DATED MARCH. 1997. AND MAY — DIRECTION OF le'as ]INCLUDE SOME OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING MEASURES: s F^ L) TEMPORARY SEEDING, TEMPORARY MULCHING(STRAW). PERMANENT lnSEEKING. HYDROSEEDING. SODDING. AND PLACEMENT OF HAY OR.RITE NETTING DURING WINTER MONTHS. 5. DEBRIS ANO/OR UTTER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE ON A WEEKLY BASIS. Pitch 5. IF DUST IS GENERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE CONTROLLED Down BY USE OF WATER TRUCKS, SPRINKLING OR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION METHODS CURB 7. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BEI'iZ PERMANENTLY STABIUZED WITH LOAM AND SEED OR OTHER GROUND COVER. RUN AS REO'D. it J $Ls e_rasf_e SEE SHEET CN OF PLANS PREPARED BY JOSEPH 7O AL DE SE & aN e � - I - ASSOCIATES INC DATED NOV 15, 2005 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF s mP oR cTx —t--w_, � �.. SIGNS WALKS LAMPS, CURB/NG AND PAVING. - — "ASS c ss '2+-- DETAIL — CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - EB ANDc Ln PIP.TD R - _,,p .: no scale -{ - SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN S LAE EG 00E xuS �2' � NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM PLAN Bc SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS T— -- - SITE DETAILS } a Prepared For Prepared BY -I/Y To J' m North River Candomimium. LLC EasternLond Surety Assoc.. Inc L Stone _— P 282 Bennington St. Christopher R. Melia P.L.S East Boston MA 02728 104 Lowell St, Peabo31-81 MA 01960 \ (978) SJ7-8727 SCALE AL N01ED ..... SECTION '�1 ICI 0 T INCHES 2 3 ,...._ SUBgro$e _sio-e To 3' DATE 1.1 2006u^SEopAQ R.urro aoNon A. Mort PLS JIJtI PE J0969 F 13879 REW67ONS SHEET Na I. mARCN 22, 2006 C-4 2 NOVEMBEF la.200E LEGEND � BIfdIK2 pp ENXLAfAB ON CQC.PAD ® tR0.9x1 N1irtTER W CfMG PAD YKMIFLI9 EWJw. ' + PRFC}ED LKM PJIE MHaCIC.INO PPd{RR LV@ aE 61xM4FR Amo.BF.wmmm- ELC@LPPAY9&Nx.OPB w P.]IDAV9Bl0 OWHLPKiBICE ®xB RIVER CANAL Orcoxame r¢Tx RMf er3a� s� oared azeBcnax NORiN en.ccJX- � ,eEeo�rw xcl» Ay MIx01V.P PAR2G[PdC£. P "'A� O li '( 01RPG vcEx ax m3tlauaE 555/xx$ rn.xaxes e ® iF)TFANfP JNEREI➢ LL.61 Imumrr POlP le P Wpy.Bil�; � e 5 �► A Im I rXsae.Xs m O a ti It J m- m• n * —w—,a• ,r I e rO� la a P ' ' 0 Z 6 Q � z U` 4 i/ a VJ L• $ y IB /ib '4 ZONING CHARACTERISTICS �92 / � IJ ,eecu�m 9PdLE u 1°PDm 6 n• NORTH RIVER CANAL CORRIDOR RELEF D n ///// aEm)Bax J66S xl / / / o J• Y-e MIXED USE DISTRICT GUIDELRIE FMWIRED HIM BP. le L // /i / _ / '//i%/i/Mi// n•' // %%// / / ' 1 sEenon 1-M(ICU PROVIDED HI f PA�RESIDENCE 19P�.IDB BB 32 SPACES C T✓�,� 6w. �,. ,; .et8 - fxAin t I. OMMERCIAL bow w NET O "tea 0. W,B Lor UDTH 60'MM. !#ATER TION — MIN LOT NZEA EPPID w MM i%w�L MAX COVEFUYE SO4 MAX LE%TNDIMA BP ]'q•BDFJp01A OJ 11P. >pAgy Bp, FRaIT SETBACK NRff F. 3'l'i0 0'3• — Im cJLn SIDE SETBACK NDff F. �� Pmt72rY Les r®IBDDwIXs REAR SETBACK NDNE GWATER TUM IPO' a wwvm.nrr MAX EWILDRG HEIGHT Iw MAX 90' 3 >m-nAnme m FENCE HEIGHT S'MAx {'FBlCF 2 m am RIPPER AREA(PARCING/ I TE9 AS REW� mt eeam� �? STREET OPEN9PACE — GOODHUE Fera m08 NO.OF DWELLING UNR9 I81DER SECTION T-11 fK) I• ID MRL LOT AREA/OWELLR IABT 3W`F/DLL LE951XN OW SPMA YES m MAX NO.OF DWELLRIG I811TS 13 DL k DY xlem^d ARO)d]ble INILB AIIM]S%IncBAee ADD 61MIi9•39 DLL k DLL ( •0 ja �� 5PALLDPI'°• '>+J AraaRa4 ecz�s. ' r w•w � udV Irl FNI�� urw Nrerawm•wo FPIISN ST y — Qte EtN MItRE °yyllA GWYJE 6iQE \ @LCrERNOPom- � O6➢m m FABWC \. LTBAim]sL _ F916110Yt0 .oa c�atEcrr""� � •r�•�• ppppp ._.. � eerm a®aFaDE wAMEflE�G CONCRETE WALKWAY 5 GTION s VERTICALGRANITE CURB �l uaro•ro°s-I�KFxn4ff a scuE b•.r-m• cu scaLE,b•.ra• a hos s "�'�'-' �, P co°cuuima. Lb•L ¢wwrFn� s �sm��r cam PARK BENCH n ; l0 BE DflHd@®T'P) sGtE NTb CII � kk 40 K � � i°FLEF6pl® rO EOr£6RPA Y�.� CQY O M•BAD)ER fDPL£ GRADE u ML _.$��IIgXO. YYWR 80.18 'Ii'I YCrCR 6'lR eF' s9m 1L�°, 1. ^"oo .^' /— GRAVEL BAss 'II P5T41 FaEro FIER dB �� NJrA1L FaE rowJR ws �� "�acrm emERAVE KWAY J � � y F£RNCNF.rauw+lre aa� FER rove.ismeanr8 aas� 88 BIT. WALKWAY SECTION /1 GRANITE CURB ® GONG. WAL r, N FF£C49r CR!¢rT<TE IGNf / Ffeia+TCMGTEIE LKNf � SCALE:b'•f-G' a SCALE•b'.P-0• w FOIE F®1l�df#bKK ' � WIE PU32 rBEMNEMPI � ; BikeFetice O ,e'BELCYI GPA¢EM � �Y eELw DRAWER � Reck camlm� ,'� g mwlur f 4 - FOLE FOLe r Baro R3rH•. R CIL t Ib' DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE_�1 ZO' SHOE-BOX LIGHT POLE cul A�rn�us a w�,caax BIKE GK ¢ A H s¢E ¢w sEm .EN. SCAIE:b'•r-¢' UI fiCAIE:b'•I'-v w TO eE OSTTLF,PD I SLALE:NTa w -.Alf#W1E vAN ew•xw cVi ACCESSIBLE .r 3 CD x¢IB tB,13> a $ ru Au uNOlcwFawn.ewYNwA ee z � J N cwsmuna rFntnR FBIDr Q r.n Foer. remarlaeawE Aa�mEciwa� e ONE WAY STOP � � r A°f]MM IIE PA.�N TE°FXE HANDICAP SIGN S MARKINGS �1 TYP. PAVER SECTION rJ1 SIGN°E° srslEY'.r.v a scALE:b•.r-o' cu � � uJ 64W°A° X-X ro r-c ro a°u�vR�Fae Z $ North River Shops Pd°R A98PECF®. rermeermra: rTor+rn�F� � S agw,mTerwtt DO NOT ame J•AGI P E N PAPo01G ® 516r1"f° ENTER Tenant Name L 3q lz , Y �Illni�l II_uL�i LilLnl�l != Ovgw@ � North River 8 EEE4 jg€€SSS' SIGN°B° Tenant Name : § Bag rFNruLE¢aw cawaaEo x Rn g L ¢ u*e+w r�snx�esos.rwrERuu nl$ €ggEx 0 Tenant Name s Condominium o 8 m€ O TYP BOLLARD SEGTYP PAVEMET SECTION wR� TION bill, WEMY WE asm>Aue¢wn SIGN YJSIGN°C° S AT RNP Lam A Wygq OYMH2 +11 Y WU&1 Y COVGi£'IE B�E1LLOnC N0w� el„JBbieCTiG£,E , a..ra.._Nw I i I I I I G+2 WA#U LLE1¢ED OflFE FABRIC bNGIED 61GN N° SIGN V, L _ —J L _ _ J t- — — J Fawnm+ E •°' °• YCgPACIFD rdurEl mm MISG. 516Ns ¢ A° C1 . 1 ,y.•Y� a RETAIL DIRECTORY SIGN �Bl PROPERTY SIGN a HANDI AP RAMP SECTIONS �ml GONG. CURB 8 WALKWAY �sl scALE:y.r.v c¢ k•n•-0• cu scxE:b••r-e• a ECALE:b••r4 a � VlLGB1FD�VN£�TOP f tl �� IA2'OR TLP RdLL P0' F lA'OD.L@P PMA nTP) EI4I CAPW1fX 8Ef]QtEW LR i• b' dR]aWtBDaCC}ID. W I6Yt NV81®�P'OL(11P) flHDfD �p.0' 4V1®tlGM.IYD fromµ PLBT QE BMCdIIE l-3B'OD. V d'A']rEP.IL p�p}� ppgp� 1.99At0.1B9 6 B�fd�ffLLla COdI®i$.¢' ) bib YKVLNflB TP. F.TbN96T0 - 9G0.I6M.VIN®FBK£1 0�F�°��taf 1@I°.AW BCR niP) Daae IBISNMBCR BCIID6/QIPd�P•OL d � iY W4 B/^.lA®B µ,, iBIRRI OC@YINBG4 TtP' P 'ss -wo= P(4� � FCIL•N HlAOE e r - FdHRC�LV!•IWV! 'A 9lLf£NDRCP1lttP) tr6 Y11lLfl..W(B TYP. MR�os ^pppppp W V(Er E fr� tR'1M FYIlLFD GRdOE 6AV'C'CW]lEIEF�IW bGIOG TLIA RdEP - Tt.'- CRV•dCt®9BWCDE LObW LCNTdl6R CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL n y BLAIE:a'•P-B• Cn aY.M'W.Is¢ss FLR Wfr C6•F E10.T- PmwenfBaedfr '4 foga�aD�o - FO°APtN) B•CGG PdD W OXb M LL9TIIBAl11D pl0� IAB 6Y PR£BOLLdfA9 11 C,•, e C° DUMPSTER FLOOR PLAN B swa:a••ra cu u W"LT EA£D 3 00Nm9 Q S'LL1G be uL<tl'LHd1CCb � � 0 y 5'6ABB4]idL® d TO PKIi Wfr g v,VB r�SD J NiIiSE � q 5 gof$��"�ig� fl DUMPSTER FRONT B $ 5 € scd�:a••ro' cu Q c� Ra'ro lo•roaxarrmEfBaaPiI treater M'BhN64TCP BOIf?IRdLL9 _ R m�aqm a•bTFBBa Y021B FP32OfID F]MtLBL' MdY vdRY BT r �Wnm no Ff3CPNo4J �y�� ao Beto®+ dPri1GTIG1 mY. ami ' 1�'OL Y9hNQC PoBT Pon®Y9mOB PdRt '� p9NBiH1 FE1'B{dIKB&IIX ]`� f81D1 DECORATIVE FENCE DETAIL m C 1 F ' ecwe:a••nm• w �J 1 1�G7�^T7'raT'�F7'9^"�r�9�L7"�- - �� auil� sr;/ t' mea t�` m Y ►y n - f s. d= ♦ .� m ►'i Ea s gL - i 91ZVI ��r, w`, a•9; r� rn �- �_ C�.v7�Sj�i`.i,� �� .�<?H,�✓ n mQOU e i `` yc., �� - �• G-�i �� anf:�:1►/ t�� n.,.pro)m 1122 ,`" �� -r•�`-'�►-=-? • ; �- -Himmaj� ligg mil '., ■❑ 'ail�1i�: M ra 7 M: MENNEN I"Ilj�l Ed I I Lj�l Ed I IM ■ aiamLEJi 1I 0 ■ Lod n I LEI X X a ml[ wj�v (_� Big M M= 1 o �_J ..........I ... 11........... ........... ............ ............ I mwmm «a�� ............— I:.... ....i9a ........... -------------------- ------------- ------ loolI.......... _oo� 1:1 1. a I H.I ........ H. I i ff HOHN foo[....SCH: M ........ I HIM: HRIMIM ........... 16,11 lool .:::::: Po WIN 0 M-mom.-I Ill 0 o II — o �_ I'll �i �==_u�l��u i I ■1 0 ■I- I r\ ' o �p _�_ - . -: . . . �-_ .: 9 Kii I FE j as -------------------- a-MUNNUMMUSH, .......... 101,111,111, - I- . ........... .. ........... Or ........... ... .. . A=— o ° = I fl m uL I l ---I:� " -� � Ir lI Ir,II _n mom JL BE W ......: .... .. . .. x n €s €€�€ €€€€€ �' ■ ;� � Iii �� _��n ° 0° : ' .. _� . . . - ■ ■ ■ > > .. ■ p C ° ..... ...... .. ... ME-s N. o v Q@ EVI•AI.Vffi R.TPJg1e03610 ®y+4VL tlM dIX.LQ't 1181�1Ai1IGGl41I19 � � g N ❑ ❑ xo.nixes W41(EFIFLD ME I BS NR99. PCL�HIIL9LUtQC a ❑ PESmmillALUt'xi' 0000e000 00000000 0 P6Sm&l3L1LIOU! dC4m@RNLUlOL eesmwrtn�xrar scsmemu.uxR � g 17771 CS i rmrtnaa wemx¢an�uxrr BUILDIN6 SECTION n sca.e:la•.r.m• as® Z � O U W o U) Z CO Hill; �fill 3 zz mmz I rm OPRL 2A 3046 m ]013 A5.0 • ___ UNIT TYPES AND SOUARE FOOTAGE • ®-ww PaFE A n amwmPa-A�xwre eau]s Paarrt.use aF �u�" umurParq ocEroaa. p.aur me erz tsowwa-awevs saws avrxs.ysm Y N�.lArO as an saws YNR A UNIT 4 UNIT UNRA Lama+Ext nA aam-seas a-aur rme c n wtnwams-avfxvs masa wcvrAre.aro 9 tmu'm,sa P.amaranm ,-aur Psraoa®wawa-Avmaae aaiarc zvraae•usas a�'+w��•m'°�a•� a-ww nwe erzexawao ,-Ar eawaramaas.r»sP aexa �g ]-VLr 1R£P!I t£DwCGII-LYERLGE MY@ R]JfL(£.IWS 9 L �P IL WI9 QQQQQ ril EaE90 N11IEP MAaB. uxrr B uNrr B s a� UNIT D UNIT D UNIT E UNIT O UNIT E UNIT C UNR F MEETING RM. UNIT O UNIT'C UNIT A e�En UNIT A 1 YNR A �• t UNIT UNRB yqR C UNIT BUNRB UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT R B UNIT e V FOURTH FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN : xLiE:w,°=r-m° am acne:us•.r-o• am Ae ,� UNIT R A UNIT Y 1 STORY \ \ \ STRUCTURE CAL SPACE . GR \ \ �� g comMUNRY --- -_-- --- --- — SPACE UNRB \ \\1 3g$�� fljiIN LOBBYi ___ \ \\y Q" � 8 STORAGE UNIT B R YNC \ _"- \ \ \ UNIT _ _ UNIT INECNANICAL STORAGE ACTIVITY g$ �g I UNRA \ , 1 1 2'g g1 14 psi, 1 UNRA LOBBY \\\ \ � tl loll, 1 I reromna UNRBCOMMERCIALy UNIT UNIT B UNIT UNIT I �pyy p COMMERCIAL GCM q?iAl{.SPACE f9 LEa�iHAN 3J+89 EF) ]6WD 9F I I 1 O �a THIRD FLOOR PLAN 6ROU D FLOOR PLAN acxE•:va°.P-P acuE:uu•.P-m• Al .0 J{j 1 LCC 15739-A GENERAL `UTILITY NOTES 8 SITE NOTES 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING 1. DEMOU11ON SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL `'S5o /, / APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. DEMOLITION MATERIAL / AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION APP _ • / _• r OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A LICENSED FACILITY. WETTING SHALL BE USED FOR DUST CONTROL DURING THE DEMOLITION PHASE. THESE PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY 2. EXISTING PAVEMENT ON SITE SHALL BE CRUSHED AND RECYCLED 8 UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED AS BASE COURSE FOR NEWLY PAVED AREAS. g ago SNOW -9 CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION 3. NEW SIDEWALKS SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. � STORAGE � BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. FINISH GRADING BETWEEN PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND/OR // - g 35 g 00 oEMPSTER CONCRETE 10 2) TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE HEAT CONTOURS SHALL FOLLOW A CONTINUOUS GRADIENT. ,� ,j� z o �- - • PATCHED. EXISTING CURB WITHIN GOODHUE STREET TO BE REALIGNED SHALL 5. � ' _ a X g / 3) ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED BE RE USED OR RETURNED TO THE CITY, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. o0 48x 48 DUCTILE IRON PIPE, AND SIZED BY ARCHITECT. BAYS ER MANHOLES + 4) EXISTING SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE \oma D 660 / INSPECTED TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR REUSE OR REPLACEMENT. ° c (D ��/� 5) WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MIN- C, j ,�P�,F j/ IMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM o �- -}� VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED 4z © 6 �/ WHERE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES CROSS. o • o� g j\ +/ 6) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE 12" HDPE PIPE EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. j r 7) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH BASINS TO DRAIN MANHOLES i SHALL BE .003 FEET PER FOOT. I x P IZ 8 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AND POLE RELOCATION SHALL BE 5o x D z\� ) COMPLETED AS PER SPECIFICATIONS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC A?� `�� COMPANY. 9} r 9) GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY AGENCY �,}� / �� ( \+ _ HAVING JURISDICTION. 10) PROPOSED 8 INCH SEWER SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING .) lox o \� SESD MANHOLE IN A MANNER TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTH g x 75 (H-P ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT. h �0 10 10 x 25 \-f 11) SHOP DRAWINGS OF THE BAYSAVER UNIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED / g x 75 (H•P•) PRIOR TO COMMEMMNCEMENT OF 60NSTUCTION OF THE UNIT. ° 1 1° x 5 AN APPROPRIATELY SIZED STORMC:EPTOR WATER QUALITY SYSTEM LINE OF UPPER. FLOOR -- -- \ c OF PROPOSED BUILDING _ -- 1 + MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE BAYSAVER. ti C o SNOW i _ iAl - S T OR G E9 3 5ar�_ D it D 9,c25 �O� /12 / li T 4 I Q I/ i 10 v _ o A 4 �� TABLE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE L E L E N D 100 ELEVATIONS O -•- o TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE STRUCTURE RIM INVERT Q' O� ovv •/ � � � o��/� i l c�, � l0 2 o SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE / CBSN 1 9.25 7.10 o DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE Q i I 1 I ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN 10 x 50 cQa EXISTING HYDRANT CBSN 2 9.50 6.85 o WG EXISTING WATER GATE �.4`' `� I o �\ i i► -o- UTILITY POLE / i � LIGHT ON POST 'o DMH 3 / 9.60 6.75 D SWW SALEM WATER WORKS / � CURB �° Dov �! __ ---- i ►o \ CBSN 4 9.50 7.00 --- FENCE 12 CBSN 5 9.00 6.75 o SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE a, DMH 6 9.68 6.35 15" ■ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN x \ i g x 50 6.60 2" 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR l •, , 10x 5 CBSN 7 8.50 6.10 100x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 10 x 50 1 PROPOSED LIGHT roX40 ( ' \ UILDICJG \ HPI i QS�-D B � �_�i � � CBSN 8 8.50 6.10 SI PROPOSED SEWER w \ PROP \ BAYSAVER j a D PROPOSED STORM DRAIN w I 1175 �� MANHOLES 8.90 5.70 15" U) , \ OR ELEVATION = II W PROPOSED WATER LINE Q �' GROUND FLOOR , 5.95 12 ° 0 I ) D SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN - � co ° I ►Ox 5 / 10 x 25 50 1 e{ `° i PRINKLER CONN. $Ire �/OS 10 - • to i PROPROP. 2" TYPE K COPPER DOM. CONN. •- � I° NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM i _J i , 10 1 I`SNOR K O /I ----- �- _i/ - S T G E I S ' �. �•1 -7 SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS C; \I NEW SIDEWALK SITE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN -= SIDEyyq PROP. 6" SDR 35 PVC - - - RMs ° Prepared For Prepared By. _ - / - - SEWER SERVICE _ _ North River Condominium, LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. s 282 Bennington St. Chrlstopher R. Mello P.L.S. SMH - S ExISTING �- - -� S - East Boston MA 02128 104 Lowell St, Peabody MA 01960 \ R = 10.26 i� GRANIT S 978 531-8121 W EXISTING 57" BRICK SEWER W - \ W \ \ -- __ _ - SCALE 8"x6" TAPPING SLEVE APPROXIMATE LOCATIOIN OF BT �- rEXISTWG 8" WATER MAINZ10 / SLEEVE & 6" 1 = 20 �^ GATE VALVE \ _ 11771 =�. 00D II 0 10 20 40 �60 V� G SESD SMH R = 10.73 I = DATE 1.35f (57") T,< F 13879 = 3.75f (10") JANUARY 13, 2006 ristopherR. Mello C164on:A. Morin I = 5.00 (PROP. 8") PLS 31317 PE 30969 SHEET N0. REVISIONS 1. MARCH 22 2006 2. NOVBrdFR 15, 2006 C- 3 IIII son I 39–A LCC 157 8 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES SITE NOTES �� / 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING 1. DEMOLITION SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL / / AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. DEMOLITION MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A LICENSED FACILITY. WETTINGi \ OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON SHALL BE USED FOR DUST CONTROL DURING THE DEMOLITION PHASE. THESE PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE � \ ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY 2. EXISTING PAVEMENT ON SITE SHALL BE CRUSHED AND RECYCLED / \ � _ _e AS BASE COURSE FOR NEWLY PAVED AREAS. UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED g g 90 SNOW O W CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION 3. NEW SIDEWALKS SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. STORAGE \ —g BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. FINISH GRADING BETWEEN PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND/OR / X35 a g oo FENCED CONCRETE CONTOURS SHALL FOLLOW A CONTINUOUS GRADIENT. — •' 9 DUMPSTER_� i 10 2) TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE HEAT /1\ Z �— PATCHED. 5. EXISTING CURB WITHIN GOODHUE STREET TO BE REALIGNED SHALL / / \ 3) ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED 6 X 9 � BE RE—USED OR RETURNED TO THE CITY, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. o° BAYSB `�tR MANHOLES DUCTILE IRON PIPE, AND SIZED BY ARCHITECT. 4) EXISTING SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE D _ ;° / INSPECTED TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR REUSE OR REPLACEMENT. ° ID \ , 6- -}� 5) WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MIN- 08 05 IMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED T i WHERE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES CROSS. 0 o • �0 9 6) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE 12" HDPE PIPE EXCEPT Q / 9 AS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. P I 7) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH BASINS TO DRAIN MANHOLES 1 SHALL BE .003 FEET PER FOOT. 9 x 50 X D z� 8) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AND POLE RELOCATION SHALL BE COMPLETED AS PER SPECIFICATIONS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC o ! �� o , X II Z rn COMPANY. h it •— °'} 9) GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED AI \ _ UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY AGENCY 9} ��pJ� I + HAVING JURISDICTION. oo lox o \ 10) PROPOSED 8 INCH SEWER SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING /I\ 9 x 75 (H.P.) -fSESD MANHOLE IN A MANNER TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTH \ / + ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT. � 1 IOx25 \f SHOP DRAWINGS OF THE BAYSAVER UNIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED / ) 10 x 5 9 x 75 (H.P.) \+ 11 PRIOR TO COMMEMMNCEMENT OF CONSTUC nON OF THE UNIT. C LINE OF UPPER FLIOR \� AN APPROPRIATELY SIZED STORMCEPTOR VUATER QUALITY SYSTEM OF PROPOSED BUIL[)ING__ MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE BAYSAVER. -------------------- _--------- ---E'I ° SNOW STOR , GE i 9 50 11 7�1 It ' \ 1 " 9 — ! i 10 i1 ��r-'Al o A , \ � --�/ �- / TABLE OF DRAINAGE STRUCK ,,ARE L E G E N D / �p ELEVATIONS °� BOJ -• — I STRUCTURE RIM INVERT o TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE b' SLE to 21o SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE Q� �� ,• \ / ' CBSN 1 9.25 7.10 o DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE � o o�. ; x 50 ' 1 ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN Q \Q 10 DV EXISTING HYDRANT CBSN 2 9.50 6.85 o WG EXISTING WATER GATE CO/ 1 0 \ ► u -�- � UTILITY POLE -io / \ \ DMH 3 9.60 6.75 LIGHT ON POST c, 1P P / ❑ SWW SALEM WATER WORKS ------- ---- I 10 \ CBSN 4 9.50 7.00 CURB �� x X FENCE 12 CBSN 5 9.00 6.75 e SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE e DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE • ,'� \ ' i I\ DMH 6 9.68 6.35 15» ■ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN x ox 5 \ i 9 x 50 \ 6.60 �12»� i 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR / — CBSN 7 8.50 6.10 looxo PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 10 x 50 PROPOSED LIGHT \ \ /1\ \ CBSN 8 8.50 6.10 S PROPOSED SEWER ►oxo ry.P.l � \ � _ BUILDI��JC \ , , \ \ PROP�`'�D BAYSAVER > / i PROPOSED STORM DRAIN \ �� ' \ II MANHOLES 8.90 5.70 15» D PROPOSED WATER LINE ,v N ', \ D FLOOR ELEVATION = 11.75 v 4 1 GROUN / � 5.95 12 � w P c \ o D SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT \ ,•� � � � , IOx 76 / \ / _ x 25 50 1 Street PLAN CO RINKLER CONN. � 10 _-- S/GN 10 PROP. 6" Ct. 52 CLO --\ �---- -- r---� r° Br' 9e NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM /OS �' 10 i PROP. 2" TYPE K COPPER DOM. CONN. - � / •— � 10 t 10 i I\ SNO K O 'I ' -----. ------------.�_-J _ t S T O R h G E S ` J I //•\ /�,7 LJt � SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS ' t. —• /� \I I ' 'I NEW SIDEWALK SITE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN _ _ _ g Prepared For Prepared By. SID - - PROP. 6" SDR 35 PVC — - - - _ - - - _ North River Condominium, LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., Inc. SEWER SERVICE _ i —� S 282 Bennington St. Christopher R. Mello P.L.S. \\ ` SMH S EXISTING �- s - East Boston MA 02128 104 Lowell St, Peabody MA 01960 \� \ ��I GRAN-1 S u W EXISTING 57" BRICK SEWER W 978) 531-8121 \ 8"X6" TAPPING SLEVE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF W --- E T SCALE / TRE 1 = 20' -.:. ., • ; ►� .,,, 10 � `/ SLEEVE 8 6" EXISTING 8'• WATER MAIN S GATE VALVE 'GOO' SESC SMH 0 10 20 40 60 ACV, R = 10.73 _. = DA TEF 13879 I = 3.75f (10") JANUARY 13, 2006 ristopher R. Mello Clayton A. Morin 1 = 5.00 (PROP. 8") PLS 31317 PE 30969 SHEET NO. REVISIONS 1. MARCH 22 2006 2. NO VFtrJEFr 15, 2006 C - 3 'owl I I SPR, f� Decision - -- o CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 20!-9 DEC IS ,ra 10. 4 1 E. Decision to Extend Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit North River Canal, LLC 28 Goodhue Street December 14, 2010 North River Canal, LLC c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire Serafini, Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLP 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Extension of Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit On Thursday, February 15, 2007, the Planning Board of the City of Salem voted in favor to approve the application of North River Canal, LLC, 282 Bennington Street, Boston, MA for Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit. A Decision dated February 20, 2007 was filed with the City of Salem Clerk's Office, and such Decision is recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 26646, Page 242 (the "Decision"). The Decision is valid for two years from the date of the Decision. The Decision was extended by the Board to October 13, 2008, then to April 13, 2009, and then to December 31, 2009. On November 19, 2009, the Board decided by a unanimous vote to approve the request of North River Canal, LLC, making the Decision valid through June 30, 2010. On May 20, 2010, the Board voted to approve a further request to extend the Decision through December 31, 2010. On December 2, 2010, the Board voted to approve a further request to extend the Decision through June 30, 2011 by a vote of 9- 0 (Puleo, Moustakis, Hanscom, Clarke, Kavanaugh, George, Ready, Sullivan and Sides in favor, none opposed). 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 ♦ WWW.SALEM.COM i The Board understands North River Canal, LLC intends to go forward with the project, though additional time is needed to put in place the necessary funding to begin construction. I hereby certify that a copy of this Decision to Extend has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Decision to Extend shall not take effect until a copy of this Decision to Extend bearing the certification of the City Clerk is recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is registered on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner of applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for //recording or registering. Charles Puleo Chair 2 �o9gQ CITY OF SALEM `sem„ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND �q COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEYDRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WAsru�G'roN STREET♦SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 Tta.:978-619-5685 FAx:978-740-0404 LYNN GOOMN DuNcaN,AIC? DIREcroR -1 N m C.7 September 5, 2008 c? ul Joseph C. Correnti, Esq. Serafim, Serafim, Darling & Correnti, LLP 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Request for extension 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Correnti: The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, September 4, 2008 to discuss the request of North River Canal LLC for an extension of the Special Use Permit granted by the Board in a decision date-stamped April 13, 2006 for an additional six (6) months. This permit was previously extended by the Planning Board to October 13, 2008. Additionally, the Board discussed the request to extend the Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit granted February 20, 2007, so that it runs concurrently with the Special Use Permit for the property located at 28 Goodhue Street. The Board understands North River Canal LLC intends to go forward with the project, though additional time is needed to put in place the necessary contracts and funding to be able to begin construction. In the meantime, the Board also understands the current condition of the property has raised concern. The applicant has volunteered to remedy this situation and clean up the property within thirty(30) days. The clean up is to include repairing the fence, removing the trash, and mowing the lawn. The Board decided by a unanimous vote to approve the extension requests making both decisions valid through April 13, 2009. Sincerely, Amy J. ash Staff Planner Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk ��goNolr,�o CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMRERLEY DRISGOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET 1 SALEM,MASSAcHLsET n 01970 LYNN GOONtNDuNcAN,AIQ' TEL:978-619-5685♦FAx:978-740-0404 DIREoroR Fax To: Joseph Correnti From: Amy Lash Fax: 978-741-4683 Date: September 5,2008 Phone: Pages: 1 (not inc. cover) Re: 28 Goodhue Street CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Per Your Request Comments: HQ Oftioejet 7410 Log for Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner DPCD 978-740-0404 Sep 05 2008 12:15PM Last Transaction Date Time Twe Identification Duration Pages Result Sep 5 12:15PM Fax Sent 919787414683 0:39 2 OK ---------------- .r. t f 1q 'j i • � tj' .ear I aJ: ' 1 N r�•'^,>,KY'\R\V i7 — ;�,?'r s / 1 I�-'I r•�4 � l Wr t5 'l. S, `y{�i �i ,,� t F" I , Y'j\,{\fix' e�`�F qt'M$ 1�A�� s�.\ `I� r < , mow- � r��. �:♦� t'j�y P\I h�✓ fr1 d t 7 11 i,. it $i SFS \\ \\ %Y-TU, 5Y' t4°• r. �tla J v1.. ( / al } l�y 4 i .�-+. ,E' re": E }\) I .•� �F\ YN�q.f� y(�n( \�� I [. -�2 y, a INN Y a • .., f 4 ; Sl'( V 1 [ "` Y`� 1',lxR�>_\t5 \1 { \ \h �� k .i,y �,I i v R, I✓ � K1 \ f `{ Lek t , �aR\.J�' i �•\>'i ,. < 9 's r �.$ 's5 i'�" `� }•rt ♦ e : t+A�,• V` ��v x }; j-�..,7 ir[ � } I� 1tj�l(,�Mk'��j� `.•�i,+ �}+ .0 a. \- S,JEt?�:^n t,S�a}K s�" �ui.�{ x "�'F\l'si✓ l'"� i �� , ar` r1.e.'.t Ety f`i,l'• R`f.f'l1�rg. + 'I �(( 1} C:� i Ia0stayy¢�•\ft ',Kr\h'\ ..'',I y 1 ��if est'.' '�at � ya•,� f•*,y7y�y ' 1 :# I< l 1. \ y. Y .L SLT4,/ Ti�• 2W'� 2" '- ,�, V' { 1 I k''1'jn+ .�,y',i _ ,� 1 -e ,+ ,?• \1 .ti , )� ) +lI'C ,Jn ,J,�� .i5 � ' \ ,! ((k..7 1, t� A i✓f \ Z\.rte "� k . . 15, y..r`c \ !!.. y vl. �1\ > \r •♦\� � jA' t �'rr 1 � ✓y?!: \ C'..• � � �.rj r\t k[�L; A,��a� t•�•'� .t ��tdy'� \ �� '. �;5• T I` `;y ` {'k\ F x >� i r s \ -c�J•t a L _ '�'y'qi e: r s s++s Y\ et ,} .9 t '�:C \ I I F' w. L \ Z\_ \ - \ a '?; �,'-f?� ,r r i x �y`` . -\ e"'e 'oaf a 1 n' n •".y 3• '.\ "' '� dna' �[ �+�`,A•`I;i 'P�,�'\ � .,��1- }maxi-; y�",'v'A�l i t�•t v+"'+` ,`s' .a - Ns �a \ {v;1�.1x \ 1'\7c. y 1 v ".*" av k �" /�Y � 1't ?x a � ♦ _a > "l�y�'�.• rf. Ste. t ✓\ 4 ` ?.,.`• i t li ,. \�\ 1 ��\� �` ,1 \ \ i 1 � 1 1{ �rk, a.,b{i �'�'' � t� '�`v F�' i.�"f 2+r Y t,� . r# <Na i a�.tt �1{ * '`. ,�°� \ ,/�•� t f .1{ \ �• , j \ \+ r \ \ F. 4 a 't#c's i .'aura ,.�` � +. t �' 1�f^�s ji\C.��\ \i'Y ..\`� � i �, 1 �,� \ ,,� ,Y. �S '�.•y!`� [ �+!� F ��fi��k)�`}.r 4 � �s ys•vr k,. ��'- \)-r` `' a.\�. r.a� i '3'7 ,"u(e-e� a%�. - rtf .E y'��,� E� �� 6`i 'i 4'a. '�' ryLu � K ��. �• .• r 1 `rtw 'I 3a r iRk T -�"` A1� .i. ��•,59 !'e `v'�tl � � i j \ '�..� � J Olin �v �� r ► b�FLr - F 111I A1�1 IL-Md �JsNT aa �MAN ��'A ��_,�, � Y 5 ► �� IF V 1�$ IVA �iaa,'l�� Q�P9r1A T, +�� , ��♦ ,a aaaa •®FL • 2, 1 ��,i' �!'.+y � 4Y �i \ ii��, ,�,« "��yg',"��5pr�''> �� ,iq�'i�bt ��.1��,• �'� �� 9 ' \ ��X. ,X�gS a��µ r� �• " {"k'. 'y '? 14' �� '".' ! �,� 1! '�i' Fd' pj> ` d a r 'k �i i3 pl` 7'� 77n7pty ,i3`,p $ U �€ x a t.,t•r {a}' ,is1 j !l��` �', l � F '� ! i �'B f�•2xS.d�n 48�'.'f� `� F��y�J��k P a �°;riM �. �� F� M1.' �ei; T� a n 4,,9 1 t 7• xns� 7 $ pa C .v 11;� 1 °� ,p '�"a.r.� � .ri '� tX1�. �.�'V �!!,� ��l`•. C�� if-� �°,�� a ,.,� \`,' � _� -„�e' . � ,1'7 ��# $1�'MA�r#. F i��.t� •Y��S t�J�' v� � � y4a� � -, � �'1� On SRA al Zla��'��s��_�1,�, -�.-.rte '�.-.. •It 1-R��P��Y��' ?�•�N �s�1��P�..j3=��.�`at�� iA► 1 ,�� VAR.t ' w Y IOL 1 @ 7�1 bpi@ f.; y 4 i w n F 8; 1 j � wK�i�..., n ',may �y� Z 1• 1'g1 } j{ 3�ut #7" T 1+ �j'"n Fi1��rG��+eS �`w +�•: iS t ; '. Aaii,r '� �.s t�' '� '_: �„i� 7a.�y��j� ti _. y�" �\`'�'+S 1' d�� a '6` s "k�A s . ,� 1� r� p �.e J• •,�� %� i 3w,� ' �A �i �15� '*-'Y: } '�'f• �• �' ��l 4r44 f c g' s r+, V,w y�, t �+� 1ti ^"' R,r. sy'�. Y 'a'^ e- n • 't �,'+Is'"� .,� ''77m�' �tt�1 �; _ t 71 i + Y • i .c t i 'i- r+ r Y /'::iy'.5�. . `( t� � �'" X�n"•'�►`� �,�� m .j�. �y1. � �� ?Va�N � V r 1 �.�' j T � "a + ,. +: � k bt 1V. "ry #y`T� .. ) 17, L _ y ♦ y yc'expwr :� IV a . - 'A��#� wall A •Y«.ia��µ� ..'-�- ` 1 ~ � \ � Mfr � !Y, ;' I:T r =' j , ..� p �' s� y�'.- • �iF s lop ` FV`, Ary`` .. `Mr p _/l� lam` ��`s .�ra, r`tr as L - ��5 _ • n" �. r `' � i .rf�.� =} !s A em I� � • - / 1'2yu:-.. F y � r 1 l s ��. row s_� �) • �a iYas� - �'.�i+d FN r � { - �ry �\' •�*�i �.�,� S �� •y b �� } *�� !� � 'f 'z: LIN rsa . ` � � '6.. � �2 `A^n{ 1\,a >'�,'0 '�1. ;'C /� �j� ',� - r ��\ a '•1 . ' a'�,� VJy \ �� t,�N�►."'�;i',�MeI'f S ��[��y x� � �ll�w��Z� � .;. � � � ��fi lk .'..., a.i'1F�''4_.T i, .� •FTY i ✓'�v'^Y'�� '� 1.//M' �� ./-t��1��.I N. T! i.��- . `�� ' !`. `r ,. \r _�'. �+,y�•'F;'.+/y4�j, ` .5+ i • +Nt �. / �l�1s:S9E i � "` �y� � •-< ,� '' �+� :c Rr � ��,. \. ✓3 vj, � r i �'S�{ !)Z �!r �i i; 17.y� I f J_ SR �, +, ��\\ ..b a a.. • 1' ' ti '+' :�i�"r� '}. e.'�C. ._ sv� 2f �Ar � F�7�'t�.� r `�e{ , � A►Y '�``�a . y. r r ._ _.� aYi yam,. i'�YF9 _� a��1,.' C •f+^e - `�yVr_-`�, V.� - �r r 1' ,, �' •�,. ? 1 a t..,f. Ate ,. �. •% � + �" }. .fit'- • 4i. � {1�, 41�$. 7 i s�1,-? �' wd.£'%/�, .. �Y \ .. '� r� �` �f +'r¢'€>;- B _ i,�fA.., ,7�` - ".�• - ,;.�';►:t _ �;y, r ,.7"p��,�� ; mss •- • gr. a- I ic"( - ,`• `.l+iiJAl 1 }► a f? "`T> rN ' Jr �• s �{! r _ x •'•' h. L , ; ,kY4i i 'et S $' ` ' }Y(.;�s, i•,_ 1 ( ;. � `� -c. t < . :''� JfQA � j' • 3 fit t t '. #Y:e° +;_:.. ':7" ..,T ems• 5+ t .Yy •� i (JZFFLb °' x 1 -t /tit i t 3!• t/'.f �� ' i Q.'%�" Ca(. tik a t«� ,��`� `� s ' .. ' ?6 �� ei. r w; +, ! �•�t) �X�t.��+�j �. 1 � �� }� , w M� _� �, _ ri b F f'7 �q Y Y "t °it YY•3 yy!• ' r ate:" x 4,q .c . yiMF 7 '• %� ° 1Ft�f�[t, �d�."' Y ?` arc �' `> '^ }�' ts� ' { rf s1 '�z��yy� 3 r / to > N'= i ♦ �B ` # , irw y� t'E X�+' ` �?3 ��`w 1 . �rI`>" r � •. �;�1t..` ; ` �-�'�,y�'.�"� yZ N . 'is s t )'}; i�e-�� _ ( tJ ,'r--•S,+ 1 ,t a .._ r-:� c� 5� .t-t. -..�►''" ��,.'�r a s, �ti la, '�'�'-� {� � �F l R a�L�i- >7 � Tf Z'.:. , 4 y�, r-•.. � ae`, ..y, 4 = '� _ 31�+�?�'y`4'�SE�i X+ i •� SjYdP t"I A/L F"••'�� r✓t. t,e fi�`-•�'eFI _..� r re t� r�S".„e� �� - -�. +itY` s / � < * l�[ n,.ip t � .t`�,`^�1 ,8.�'ei .. .*s.t-, -':r .�y,..�e.- � � _ „" `�'� a jji�• � sit�q e t ��`� .6r. !' Il J�' �,`r r� r6�• Y'ti�4.�y� i r • v 'r..,( +� l'� •'fix "� S ^" _ 2..= M �� a J(r s: • _ f.. / • 'fin �" T B` A I, oy� "'Te 117 A)IT. If Min ILI <d7- I vs,, V� AN' jF. 0 IA� "IlIx NA f* VY LIO 'Wkt ap IWITO O �l 101 I'vC !�Mi-R-4,19 z fit gar - +` r ♦ 'w-Y �y R j ) 1 I f'•I Mal AW � k �� ata -.. , ..._ y ��\l�^-:�Sr. ^�� `3s �•-i{ .� 4 � • �� 1 }` On ✓f 4 7P„, • fat... 'r +., ?-. �/„� •�"� j 2;� + 6.�vP'+L r ,ta�,, y .: ,, '" - e, � � ��h•, . ,/� _. i� +� . ."b`. �rd � ..� ...rc_'.�T';aF +fv., � J. !4'J'- .�f t .r „1!i. � � (�• � rfi4 j d &xe j�f`rx � r t' � , �• .: i� f�;r}s� yyr 'atrX � Ljr 'tq i r T4k �yd n, a` IL �r r .. � �''�,�sfi'te� y- ��'t'J`' 4 s l' / ��i' •_ �y�, w� "�' �. �°�.\'S� I 4. P Tl i---V�w.- \`a +, KI lArA CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2010 JUN I I P 5: 02 CITY C, ILE # Decision to Extend Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit North River Canal, LLC 28 Goodhue Street June 17, 2010 North River Canal, LLC c/o Joseph C. Correnti, Esquire Serafini, Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLP 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Extension of Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit On Thursday, February 15, 2007, the Planning Board of the City of Salem voted in favor to approve the application of North River Canal, LLC, 282 Bennington Street, Boston, MA for Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit. A Decision dated February 20, 2007 was filed with the City of Salem Clerk's Office, and such Decision is recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 26646, Page 242 (the "Decision"). The Decision is valid for two years from the date of the Decision. The Decision was extended by the Board to October 13, 2008, then to April 13, 2009, and then to December 31, 2009. On November 19, 2009, the Board decided by a unanimous vote to approve the request of North River Canal, LLC, making the Decision valid through June 30, 2010. On May 20, 2010, the Board voted to approve a further request to extend the Decision through December 31, 2010. The Board understands North River Canal, LLC intends to go forward with the project, though additional time is needed to put in place the necessary funding to begin construction. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 •TEL: 978.745.9595 FAX: 978.740.0404 ♦ WWW.SALEM.COM I hereby certify that a copy of this Decision to Extend has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Decision to Extend shall not take effect until a copy of this Decision to Extend bearing the certification of the City Clerk is recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is registered on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner of applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Charles Puleo Chair 2 e 1 � SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN OF NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM IN SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS s , HARBOR 1 h 1 ;r DRAWING INDEX REFERENCES d I `Y 77 ASSESSORS MAP 16 LOT 372 & PART LOT 300 SHEET 1 INDEX SHEET _ SHEET 2 EXISTING COIVD/PONS PLAN ZONING DISTRICT: BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT, ° "-� aT < SHEET 3 SITE LAYOUT PLAN •i SHEET 4 SITE GRADING & U77UTY PLAN NORTH RIVER CANAL NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT SHEET 5 SITE DETAILS :fi m DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 22202 PAGE 393 / RECORD OWNER: NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC x. LOCUS MAP GENERAL N07ES L E G E N D 1) THIS PLAN IS THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD 0 TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE - SURVEYANDPUBLICANDPRIVATEPLANS. - o EXISTING SEWER SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN OMH M� IE EXISTING CATCH BASIN 2) U77U77ES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON F7£LD SURVEY AND a. EXISTING HYDRANT NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM RECORD PUNS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICA 71W OF .w EXISTING WATER GATE UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS UmuTY POTS SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS LIGHT M POST 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND a sxW URBM WATER WORKS INDEX SHEET DETERMINING THE LOCA770N, SIZE AND ELEVA77ON OF ALLPENCE EXIS77NG UTILITIES WN SHOWN OR NOT SHOON THESE PLANS —•—100 — EXISTING CONTOUR red For a B PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER SHALL BE N077FIED 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE North RIwr Condotrkllum, LLC EaRtall Land Survey A... Ina IN WRITING OF ANY U77LI77ES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE - 282 Bennington St. Chrletopher R. MN/o P.L.S. PROPOSED CON57RUC71ON AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL AC77ON a SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE Eart Bolton MA 02128 .104 LowMI St, MA o/Be0 BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH 7HE WORK. a DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE (87e) 5331-811-81 111 a PROPOSED CATCH BASIN SCALE 4) THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS DEEDS �_ PROPOSED CONSPOTOUR RAOE AS NOTED a, " AND THE RESUL IS OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DATE. NO CER77F7CA77ON IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY 77ME �� PROPOSED LIGHT Bo-. OR AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED _S— PROPOSED SEWERC 0 1 INCHES Z EASEMENTS. ] I s _p� PROPOSED STORM DRAIN - pA 7E � 6) THE OWNER SHALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE NTH ALL APPLICABLE —W_ PROPOSED WATER UNE JANUARY fA 2008 cnrnigwd .w CODES AND R£GULA7701VS GOVERNING THE MATERIALS AND/OR x F 13879 REWS/ONS METHODS OF INSTALLATION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED /. ATAROi 22, 2006 SHEET 1 Of 5 ON THIS PLAN. e CANAL .Pune*"""• }4TN,E 49 k, i6 RIVER N07ES: 1. ZONING OISTRICT.• BPO BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT, �--v _ X8..70 NORTH RIVER CANAL NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 2 ASSESSORS MAP 16 LOT 372 R PART MAP 15 LOT JOO 6 J. DEED REFERENCE.* BOOK 22202 PAGE 393 ' A EASEMENTS AGREEMENT.; ETC N07ED IN ABOVE DEED ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. S THE ENTRE LOCUS/S SHOWN WITHIN FLOOD ZONE A, a°�b FEMA FLOOD MAP 250102 PANEL 1, AUG 4 1985 ae Md 10 6. PLAN DATUM TAKEN FROM ABgPARCELS):VE FLOOD MAP, RM 6 LOCUS LOT AREA /2 79,OJit SF. 7. / 8. STPEET LINE IS APPROXIMATE ? s 10 •., / SFR SEi G • �•.• wwN Ix ry �vQ �CLAYMAN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP p � ` SURFACE IS CRUSHED L E G E N D BRICK CONCRETE RUBBLE / Q \ 1 o TMH E%ISTNG SEWER M E MANHOLE B(OOI�G �• ® SMH E%IBPNC SEWER MANHOLE �u o OMH EXISTNG GRAIN MANHOLE 1 I. ,.ATCH BASK FASTING WATTERNCATE UTLOY POLE LIGHT ON POST Q�\rh \ _ I2 to. SALEM WATER WORKS CURB 0 �� FENCE FENLE n rr \ \ TI PAYEMEMT SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN / NOTE: • rN To B/IJOe SV.et ` : CNAN NMFENCEFUNB iw f- NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM wBO T' ALONG PERIMETER OF SITE ,1'I 4�2yyE' W� • h SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 41?.e Or� •om NOBYyWE s0.B0 ... 4'T. .....ca!a -Ip x EXISTING CONDITIONS r' 'MMWau6 �S9Yp°W tW.N' f on Prep°nd for �c �— =NUISC2D'E To.16' _ o 2a2 RM tm St./nlum, LLC ECHI Land SLrvey .L.& Ina L a.wrz wR0 '^ s .v oS,:Aew 282 BennNBton St. Gh%tOphx R. Md/p P.L.S r\' East BOatW MA 021128 IPF Lowell St Pe0 y MA 01980 m.0 (978)531-8121 y IO NNWS PA�Ma =M =""— — — W STREET sc1 a 20• 0111111— 4NUARY DA0 10 30 M 60BENCHMARK JAA 1.T 2008 4 HYDRANT SPINDLE — F 13879 ELEVATON 16.21 \F RENSIONS I. MARC/22, 2006 SHEET 2 OF 5 CANAL S%T5' lE 1.33 RIVER n vc,ns. NORTH etTd se'+rp0�" _ CONTAINER (LONG.RAG 4 + EIS "L5 3ey li b qb iii _ a y � 1 y y9 LAW WWNE t h UvxR + 2Ql' 41 AREA �� STONIES I 22 M B uwwron N/F Q �Q- ;li • 3c$ (TmuU TUR CLAYMAN REALTY P a $ I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Bull L C BUIl01NG CONC.QE>E WAS 6 • c W V _ Q r CONCRETE WALR ZI NOTE: r �I� HORIZONTAL DESIGN TAKEN FROM PLAN BY JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE k ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED FEB. 9, 2006. 'P` I PROPOSED 4 STORY BUILDING ° I _ (SEE ARCH,11WRAL PLANS Yy b } I FOR SPECIFlC SECTONS AND USES) I PARwk10a'i nSa� ENTRY 0.Y ,T ° SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN Street NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM G - - - - -- PI/IA ,� ,,,-,: SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Be / SITE LAYOUT PLAN T Ali `I I` P-IR 7 '. .A- CONSTRUC a y1e R'RI41xWs sWI,AI,Y NOT 20-E 70.16' OeV7 9440 O+d a w (eD9/e Y AOA COMPT NEW SIOEWA O*� z'.1p"11 _ RA AT LIANT NE 9,]Y fi+nml[ Pe \'69' 282 BMNorth f/NN fMl St. LIC ChOb a LMR$Yrvey Ae90C., (TIG MPS DRIVES OF W ALICNM Ans 9 oPher R. Md/P P.LS GA.", �T - Eeef Bosforr MA 02126 104 Lowd/Sf, Pe -dy MA 01960 CURB (978) 531—8121 SrileEP,1 SCALE f 20' GOOD141JE o ,o zo Ao ea DATE AOv "�. Malo 4 JANUARY 14 2006 CAnP "R F 13879 A"\ READS Y. M I. MARCH 11, 2006 SHEET 3 OF 5 AL 4 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES TABLE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE O CANd°a'p'5� / E RI yc+ 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ON ELEVATIONS yR NORM NppoA www''s `0' i / AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SRR AND ELEVATION STRUCTURE RIM INVERT ��)"� " _ \ OF ALL EXISTING PRIOR TES. SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON C89A 1 9.00 8.60 ENGIN PLANS, PRIOR 0 ANY CONSTRUCTION. ME \ ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTFlED WITH WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING ATTR E E PROPOSED CBSN 2 8.50 6.85 � ' \\ BEFORE PROCEEDING AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION B BEFORE PROCEEDING W11H THE WORK. 0831 3 9.50 7.00 A CBSN 4 8.00 8,75 / _ ms0 _— 10 2) TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE HEAT PATCH _ PAT'CHEO. mse DMX 5 8.80 8.60 / ., 3) ALL WATER MAINS SHALL E CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED OP PROSED DUCTILE IRON PIPE. AND SIZED BY ARCHITECT. DMH 8 8.80 8.00 / b.N MIN str 6ARREx eArsARER 4) IEXISTINGNSPECT SEWER ANO WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CBSN 7 8.50 8.10 / I ''' oN�� +/+ INSPECTED TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR REUSE OR REPLACEMENT. mea CBSN B 8.50 8.10 ® BUTTS T"�E�+/ - 5) WATER AND SEWER SHALL IO CONSTRUCTED WITH A MIN— BAYSAVER 10AN AND 9 a UK ARY j" ]MUMVERT HORIZONTALSEPARA SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM MANHOLES 9 8.90 5.70 (15•) ° / WHERE W SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES SCALL BE MAINTAINED 595 12•) /_ y WHERE WATER AND SEVER FAGLITES CROSS. PRovosED m ` 6) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE 12' HDPE PIPE EXCEPT SILT BABRER i m '0� ° AS 07HERMSE NOTED HEREON. / Z / 7) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH BASINS TO DRAIN MANHOLES iSHALL BE .003 FEET PER FOOT. / 8) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AND POLE RELOCATION SHALL BE COMPLETED AS PER SPEGFlCATIONS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC T, i u COMPANY. D �+ B) GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED ' 05 LOW& / / \+� HANNC JURISDICTION. RACCORDANCE WI1H THE UTILITY AGENCY 10) PROPOSED 8 INCH SEWER SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING SESD MANHOLE IN A MANNER TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT. 11) SHOP ORANNGS OF 1HE BAYSAVER UNIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED Umq / �aID-_ PRIOR TO COMENCEMEN7 OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIT. VeW Up UNESofpIES \ � of L E G E N D Y : uwN /re N/F 0 TAH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE AN REALTY o DMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE UM/IED 41TED PAR7NERSN/P o DMH EXISTING CATCH MANHOLE III EXISTINGEXISTING HYDRANTASIN ® x AT e� EXUTIISTING POLE WATER CATS UGHT ON POST (`o I / iaao I asww SALEM WATER WORKS JlF`.w r&. / i` I \ / �. \ CURB FENCE p ° a \�D DMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE DMX PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED CONTOUR , \ 1OPROPOSED SPOT GRADE WU#U# 9.ro '1' =G AT ,I/ �� BUIPROPOSED LIGHT \ J� PROPOSED LDING 9 v/ 'I� / eox � LA. — PROPOSED SEWER —D— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN / \ gYgYgY _W_ PROPOSED WATER LINE B w \ ]7JSS SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN s� / :a G o 1 GR011N0 FLOOR DEVAnON 11.]5 I iP Br1094_Street s pROPosEo ycro�; � I NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM '^ `� ' SALEM, MA SSACH SETTS V Il•'w q—'O .p ' 3 �I w e R ea 94[wNle a O °Y i, I .I e.w s ,' ;• "� SITE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN •RRtNWS wexutt ' 1 w1.9GArE BPaE.�n . M Gere Y. o.1Pn • pyre °j° / p01E s' NarN RAW Condam/n/um, (LC Eeetan Land Survey Am=. Inc 282 B rNIigton St. Chr/efophnr R. Mello P.P.L.S.w w �Pa°Cie'E m EaSRNG sY mca s EntBanton MA 02128 104 Low /St. Peabody MA 01"0 _w (978) 531-8121 , _ w.a n SCALE ®ryyp APPRONMA1E LpOAn • � rr w r° Ewsnxc B•wAIER NMN _w IT 1'w 20' ,,.n S REET f.,,. � 0 E �' ... DHu � II x, z ym yR 0 10 ZO 40 60 6 R ID.]S BENCHMARK i.i>ex 1v _ GATE n e �0 P6oP JANUARY 13 2006 �a.1. ° 4 wm V'av vP zr+lnn a EUEHYDRANT N 16.21 as nn> x wsee F 13879 Et£VanON 16.]1 \ RE 1. MAR 1. MARCH 2$ 2008 SHEET 4 OF 5 DETAIL DETAIL STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL MANHOLE CATCH BASIN TRENCH SECTION no scale no scale no eels no Boole TRENCH SECTION e.wa+L"v na u�".i to no scale 2r.u•CAS,ea IIDMd W a M"e llu rz dPAL£D PAt£9 VNPAl aFCR= eatPANNOHAYBKE C°urva LaWF9 BNeY 2 to eOo w Lwwo,etl .'[n.N A VOM OPSTC CW W LVO` ON`1U IAFNCAVAnd- ECASi LYA1CPElE WALL SECTION A�ILL I1NIi M AddANOll b..mt pw,.4'.. BMYQL BIAZ WALL, ...E YIFFt°ea moan mly wate.igM) :d M®[ T•MB R 9n0YL Ax0 dddaTMPgVAFY a SIEFL RATE =AWMINIIM. OY r CONCBLOCKFEtt ME uANNdE dW x P AT I3'O.C. IM'dWrQDna Yf004QImMal@IFMV MC — D DEyvAlart oo m L[0@) Ap. In tlNSNED nD G OHAYBAE 41WN191IKE d3/ $TWE NEGWATER MAIN BRI.INVERT BAHTRENCH SECTION an no mode r ONUI alae FOdoAiwa CATCH 3-N LOAu s SEES EPAYID DETAIL EROSION CONTROL oS.c.LaTIM dA FENCE )EdNTC E DETAIL uun a Mlun H°To HANDICAP CURB RAMP acAnW- I RLOEWCKIaCDd-0erIDWZ O...[. KCCA.U- EflNC NAY BMmS N.T.S. dxllcew dRErn W pd ...u..n SIDWALK W e• o wATEn uAw le'w uoan =1111 51111 SEIE�1 flA061u ' o o RAMPS(BROOM FINISH ox[a>• 11111111 11111111 vxdsrvxam SUBwAo[ on a„ ACROSS DIRECTON OF W r le•d r Mx. v� TRAVEL) ' a a a rc Pitch pfth oDwN Down DOw11 L1Y 1.12 CURB 3'-9' MIN. RUN AS REO.O. I SEE SHEET C1.1 OF PLANS PREPARED BY JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE & ASSOCIATES INC DATED NOV. 15, 2005 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF SIGNS WALKS LAMPS CURBING AND PANNG. DETAIL — CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE no scale SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM PLAN SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 3 SITE DETAILS - rapa or Prepare Y• 1-1/2• TO �• Nath Rlwr Cand"IMIUm LLC Cot. Land Surrey A.. Inc. stone n 282 BennM9tan St. Christopher R. Mello ALS East Boston MA 02128 foe LOMx9 StPeaEWW1 MA 01980 (978) 557-8121 SGIE AS NOMD SECTION yw �e TB' o i INCHES z a Suba[OBa 1 1/2'w To 3' DATE •>exM` JANUARY 1A 2006 n.ID+n..s.Mtla as .Y°n1 w - PLS 31317 PE w2es F 13879 REWSIONS 1. WRO/22, 2006 SI EET 5 OF 5 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN OF NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM IN SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS t ^ _ n "f C AARHOR \ nl A REFERENCES ORAW7NG INDEX h ` ASSESSORS MAP 16 LOT 372 & PART LOT 300 SHEET I - INDEX SHEET - SHEET 2 EX/STING CONDITIONS PLAN ZONING DISTRICT: BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT, " 'n m/ SHEET 3 SITE LAYOUT PLAN NORTH RIVER CANAL NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT ° I \I m' SHEET 4 SITE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 22202 PAGE 393 I ' {r a _ �, m SFIEET 5 SITE DETAILS j m RECORD OWNER: NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC � 9 LOCUS MAP GENERAL NO7ES - L E G E N D 1) THIS PLAN /S THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND Fl£LD o TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANS o DMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN 2) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN nn EXISTING HYDRANT NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF .w EXISTING WATER GATE UNDERGROUND COND/RONS. UTIUTY POLE 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND i Q�' SALEM ON POST SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS oSWe SALEM WATER WORKS DETERMINING THE LOC471ON, S12F AND ELEVA71ON OF ALL — CURB INDEX SHEET EXIS77NG UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS - —LOO FEN NG CONTOUR X19 aAWarqd By PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED - * 100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE North R/ror ContlomhNm, LLC Eoete Land Survey Aeeao, Ina. IN WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING 41TH THE 282 Bern/ngton St. LYnietopher R. MN/o P.L.S PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION • SMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE Emt Boston MA 02128 1Oe Lowedl St Peabody MA 01960 BEFORE PROCEEDING WIN THE WORK • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE (978) 331-8121 a PROPOSED CATCH BASIN SCALE 4) THIS PLAN /S BASED ON 774E REFERENCED PLANS DEEDS —Jgp— PROPOSED CONTOUR AS NOTED AND THE RESULTS OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DATE. 100x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE NOTN /S INTENDED N* TO PROPERTY TIRE PROPOSED LIGHT OR ASS TOO THE THE EXISTENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED _S— PROPOSED SEWER 0 1 INCHES R J d EASEMENTS —D— PROPOSED STORK GRAIN - DA IF a 6) THE OWNER SHALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE —w— PROPOSED WATER UNE JANUARY 14 2006 M6. '`R'lr oer CODES AND REGULA77ONS GOVERNING THE MATERIALS AND/OR HSS''SSff "' F 13878 METHODS OF INSTALLA77ON OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED REWSWNS ON THIS PLAN. I. MERCK z2, zLX>s 91EET 1 OF 5 CANAL 'pxot RIVER NOTES 4WD- la NORM 1. ZONING N R�R CANAL PD BUSINESS PARK SENT, OOD MIXED USE NO —1��v! 2 ASSESSORS MAP 16 LOT 372 &PART MAP 15 LOT JOO 3. DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 22202 PAGE J93 4. EASEMENT$ AGREEMENTS ETO. NOTED IN ABOVE o y DEED ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. '/''• 5 THE ENTIRE LOCUS IS SHOWN WITHIN FLOOD ZONE A. 85 FEMA FLOOD MAP 2501OZ PANEL 1, AUG A 1985 a i'P' to / 6. PLAN DATUM TAKEN FROM ABpW FLOOD MAP, RM 6 7. j LOCUS LOT AREA /1 PARCELS): 79,0313 SF. / 8 STREET LINE IS APPROAIMATE r + \ uWW z N Q / I UCLA MAN REALTY R' ` `LIM17ED PARTNERSHIP /p SURFACE IS CRUSHED L E G E N D (J` l CONCRETE RUBBIE BRIG 1 1MH EXISTING hlEPNOHE MANHOLE A " BUILDING 0 OMH EASING SEWER MANHOLE ` o�OMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE V \ I. CATCH BASIN EASING HYDRANT \ \ EA TING WATER CATS UTILITY POLE LIGHT ON POST Q \ 12 SALEM WATER wORNS 9 CURB FENCE \ IAMN \ P" OT SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN ' Ai '11h BOFOOT TE • w d'4 TO°BIIEB° Sffpel 'V2p� 418"°^� cHFOCTTK FENCE RUNS —�'e NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM GSALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ALONG PERIMETER OF SITE 1.�12&59' 1?� — , lo o °rod G EXISTING CONDITIONS 4T 1e'w, , Odin enuWNW=&pL.AA=N014e'2D'E TfL16' . ,. N059TIB"A 1M.N -- Oa _ 'o=• „ North Rl�.Rb t o St fnbm. LLC East"CM.10 Ler Survey Assoc, Inc 262 Bennblgfan SL 104 Lopher R. Mello P.L.S °\w u Eget Booton MA 01129 f0i LowN/Sq PeoDotly MA 01880 (978)5)-8121 SCALE 20' It GOODHUE p 0 10 so ,B so t BENCHMARK DA TE JANUARY 1J; 2008 chNatm"e,-a. vmlo w HYDRANT SPINDLE ELEVATION 1.1 \h\ F 13879 RENSTONS Ak 1. M4RCH 22, 2006 SHEET 2 OF 5 CANAL Sr2A;a•,.A RI ER NORTH ",Id _ TRASH CONTAINER (GONG.PAD p � } ��b b• �+�Ei,. � x.n s t("b e '� 9 3P I, 45b ,p p IY x } +\\ LAWN T WNNE AREA STIWIES I j +� i\ NK 3e� (TmW TAR �1--LL CLAYMAN REALTY e $ LM/TED PARTNERSHIP yy REMOVE CCDmmIRD WALK I� CONCRETE Q r CONCRETE WAJT +GI I NOTE: HORIZONTAL DESIGN TAKEN FROM PLAN BY JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE k ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED FEB. 9, 2006. x.s $ PROPOSED 4 STORY BUILDINGEE Rp3 I FOR(SPEQBC ARCHITECTURAL AND USES) I p YNflA Ni 44 r I M. Alsae' 00 ENTMe SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM G ---- - - � PLAEA N ,I\ m'W ,�:,;_ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS RO� " '42'0tga SITE LAYOUT PLAN glias "4d roparo a, roparo x Ap NSTRUCi "�v ""� N013B'20'E 70.16' NEW socwALN Dt3'm'. �p,ay Nwfh RAer CondomfnNm. LLC Eaefem Land SurroY Asaoe, Inc RAA S,AT , OwM MRg qT DRIVES OF CR wC•NMENi m.ira °tN1E Ra 262 B Boston M St. 10"t owhall S4 R. P; ALS. 01860 KITE WR9 Ewt Barton MA 02128 (978) 531-8121 S'T`REET E SGAL J P� L a 20• , GOODHUE B aar R D IU 20 !D 60 D� ��• OA TIE JANUARY iJ, 2008 cnnPLTh R. Male vI. eim7 F 13879 REVISIONS f. MARCH 11, 2006 SHEET 3 OF 5 sI ° GENERAL U71UTY NOTES CANAL NG� "o, B TABLE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE RIVER 'WN ' 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ELEVATIONS 7N rM,e»fy NOR'Rlw�Ox MNw�s d'' / STRUCTURE RIM INVERT l'J��L'r� \ I AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION WW \ OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, 910NN OR NOT SHOWN ON CBSN 1 8.00 8.80 ENENEER SHALLSE PLANS. RIOR TO ANY BE NOTIFIED IN WRING OF MY 4 UTIUTIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CBSN 2 9.50 6.55 \ \ CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION . s BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. CBS! 3 9.50 7.00 ' as / meD IO 2) TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE-HEAT CBSN 4 8.00 8.75 - PATCHED. mA DMH 5 8.60 8.80 / 3) ALL WATER MAINS SHALLE CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED PROPos2D DUCTILE IRON PIPE, AND SIZED BY ARCHITECT. DMH 6 8.60 S.DO / w..M-1N SILT BARRIER SAYSAVER 4) EXISTING SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CBSN 7 8.50 6.10 / 1 paw +/+ INSPECTED TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR REUSE OR REPLACEMENT. asD CBSN a AND SHALL BE BAYSAVER 8.50 6.10 O Looe N,D O ea]NDN+Y ?�+/ 5) MUM HORIZONTAALLRSEPARATION OF CONSTRUCTED0 EET. A MINIMUM MANHOLES 9 8.90 5.70 (15•) /• a, + VERTICAL SEPARATION OF /8 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED 5.95 12' © WHERE WATER AND SEWER FACIUMES CROSS. PROPOSED 6) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE 12' HDPE PIPE EXCEPT SILT BARRIER '°� ° AS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. / a / 7) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH BASINS TO DRAIN MANHOLES / SHALL BE .003 FEET PER FOOT. / / y 8) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AND POLE RELOCATION SHALL BE S� COMPLETED AS PER SPECIFICATIONS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC / a =I, / _ 11 COMPANY. 9) GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED / • "� UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY AGENCY LamApY OP HAVING JURISDICTION. 10) PROPOSED 8 INCH SEWER SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING SESD MANHOLE IN A MANNER TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTH +\ ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT. 114 1 / leas +\\ 11) SHOP DRAWINGS OF THE BAYSAVSH ER UNIT ALL BE SUBMITTED �L0 .F !I UNE CY \ PRIOR TO COMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIT. UPPER BTORIES GP° L E G E N D r o)s�r$ I u"N / 1E N� o TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE yV Ey>E sOru SEE° *. p OO,{5'� C17ED PA REALTY o DMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE LlMlTED PARTNERSHIP ® DMH EXISTING MANHOLEG DRAIN CATH BASIN ptA+. es. EXISTING HYDRANT JW eWv EXISTING WATER GATE ® ' B UTILITY POLE LIGHT ON POST a ,p 8. I i ,me° I osAW SALEM WATER WORKS Ja NS CURB 10 FENCE \ • DMH PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE \\\1 • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE 1E • PROPOSED CATH BASIN s PRro°sm I 00 PROPOSED CONTOUR ANSFWM A \ T 100x0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE ` PAD WNNE OF PROPOSED LIHT eN9 I� TW \B U"o Al ♦I, 8 \ .0a / mao my 9 /J� PROPOSED BUILDING ./ \ urm —S— PROPOSED SEWER '\ / � n _D_ PROPOSED STORM DRAIN sr \ _Wt_ PROPOSED WATER UNE I � / OUNDFFLLOMEIPVATI0N11.75 ° SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN PRo,GSEG _ — °B�d9e�ee1 GRNORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM s CCN 1� I �• . a `� _ — SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS G O ti aD A p, SITE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN L drvAyyq,y aocwAu ' a 1 RaLGAiE D ° OroW are North "sLEn r° ' I' s 182 Ben MTAton St.lnlum. LLC OWrlNw, Land r R. Mello Ano , Ina r°;a « LS s a Aa4'E m �� .w Eoet Boetm MA 02128 (97Bf 5J!-8121 ra - ND sY a•°N sEwm =� fOf Low(9 ) Peabody MA 01980 IF ° a SCALE \10 _ MPROMNA7 IOCA � _ _wM. EE,Fi, ALE S °M a14 vAlwyal ':b EKISTNG 8'WATER MIN n.a C'. 1 _ OF GOODHUE II _ sca six o ID zD aD bD FF, 01 FOOL w . a,4 xs er DATE u BENCHMARK d' I-?]M' 1008 fan. < JANUARY i,x m° � d'naBNR AN 'a HnRT SPINDLE �1 300 Y P PLS]/J1] PE M969IF13879 ELEVATION 16.21 1. MARCH 22, 2006 SHEET 4 OF 5 DETAIL DETAIL STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL MANHOLE no scale no scale CATCH BASIN TRENCH SECTION TRENCH SECTION 2.GIµ.WAAHIX Fe.WE At COVER no Peale 110 scale LF6uzw u nw,uBFLLEp GRux no lade n 2e,u'PAST nw pwe we oua °.m..m a,=1 S.eYf 12)a1 zY 1N PI.Ka uxPI.YID,mtoPAWp p,LyEDHAMATE Cw,eu LW9 B2w0WNy,,b eYN A.Wµ4. o I X tFlEGST CONCRETE CONEPAChO IMi IPgW OECPSi 6HCAETE WI1L SELTCH LLWT OF TN.. BAIXFILL PROW^F AREIINc All AN4 one Pm. .hon,Le. Phot( mout Ute; CgMO ASTDIPaRART O$TEFL P 1E otp°Rm eYflfFD AWNIHUNB'CONCBLOC( UETY TYPE YANx01E CpAyy AA(ln) P AT lz"o.a hW Pu`T P S1aPtf��na —OURLT -p Po�popG eaP!•lot 'HMALEOPT 1-- vY(p J'F�O.g SEEP E J/4' PRECAST awcRETE BASE WATER MAIN am1N.T LTRENCH SECTION —d � no soda RB Ary e aaexm shoo PtteM1NM NNPAL40 DETAIL EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE 164E WWO1 POSTS DETAIL wPYo mma N.Anxa.IW SONENT HANDICAP CURB RAMP PoAP.c IXGv.Lnax- coxTP.FAeR. PACaFlLL MOMCE SIIm.. HAY DIES N.T.S. Arm s,aaxt Az e• aclNEo sr nw GLffrnox U.axoman (aaGx Ensnxc caaxo owo H SIDEWALK No ctSx RAMPS(BROOM FINISH aAomu wA,En NAm W lha•eIx' IEDu) -IIII 'IIII .S IIII IIII III III uxasnmem e160RAOE ACROSS OIRECTON OF U^ TRAVEL) ' a a Pilch Pilch cry O.Ph 1.12 1;1Y CURB 3'-fi' MIN. XI-- RUN AS R11-D. SEE SHEET CI.? OF PLANS PREPARED BY JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE k ASSOCIATES WC DA7ED NOV. 15, 2005 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF SIGNS, WALKS LAMPS CURBING AND PAWNC. DETAIL — CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE no seals SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN PLAN NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS SITE DETAILS -,/2• m J, Prepared w Preps K stone NoiHM RAW Cazdon fir luh. LLC Eastern Land Sarwy A9aPa' Inc 2B2 Benn/ngton St. Christopher R. Mello PLS Eoet Boston NA 02126 104 LawN/St, Peohody MA 01960 (978) 5J1-8121 SCALE AS NOTED s SECTION 1-1/2'To 3• h>suR+`A� Su49Wde Ston. DA 7F JANUARY 14 2006 R.uem Co .Nom as Jfdn PE M969 F 13879 REWS/ONS I. 'MARCH 22, 2" -WET 5 OF 5 1 l- ® IaI■I ® I` . ■ hI■I I�I■I I ® I�I■I T .... ._ ._ ..., ... ...:Y _..L.. .. '.1�1�1�1.\I��11■1-11aI��IIa- X1.11\I��II■1�1.�1�1.' Iii �. .� i. i = �� _ �� i.i - i■i ■ i� 1 Ill a0 I i.i Fil _ I� i.i i.i � � �:� is � . � � � iii 57 Sim 1� o o I54uI ',� '� o �r a o rl ■ ■ I of ,'o o, o ' � ; . Elul F .^'t��vmufn�'�r� _ � '�3.. t�t��1��.vinirzn��' �jr«•.,:'] � - ��am:im:��[' < " 1"'010x, r dao! ' Tool— P—loo�_► _ _ !oo , �o! Y - : • ® I I I I I I ® I' Awl I I ■ o ■.1�1. 1�1.' =i is X01 iii: = iii: � � �.� iia i �:I I 3 { AIN it w IRS Mimi�R�w ,,Alm . dim Y ®m �r.�M1� _' _` � ` � QX�Sr� �ec�es� / --- � _ reNul9q CITY OF SALEM 3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISOOLL MAYOR 120 WnsH.,c oN S'nr:-r♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSE'rrS 01970 T1s[.:978-619-5685 Ft,-x:978-740-0404 LYNN GOOMN DuNcnN-,AIC' DIRccrm November 24, 2009 Joseph C. Correnti, Esq. - Serafini, Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLP Cn 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 _a Re: Request for extension 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Correnti: The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, November 19, 2009 to discuss the request of North River Canal LLC for an extension of the Special Use Permit, Site Plan Review Special Permit, and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit previously granted by the Board to June 30, 2010. The Special Use Permit, granted in a decision date-stamped April 13, 2006, was previously extended by the Planning Board to October 13, 2008, then to April 13, 2009, and then to December 31, 2009. The Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permits, granted on February 20, 2007, were extended to October 13, 2008, then to April 13, 2009, and then to December 31, 2009 to run concurrently with the Special Use Permit. All three permits are now extended to June 30, 2010. The Board understands North River Canal LLC intends to go forward with the project, though additional time is needed to put in place the necessary funding to begin construction. The Board decided by a unanimous vote to approve the extension requests making both decisions valid through June 30, 2010. Sincerely, Danielle McKnight Staff Planner Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk p Focdc�b\ e 1�ovS�Yv� cov�F;cmcz.ti�, 2� 600d�,v e Commonwealth of Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Charles D.Baker,Govemor ♦ Karyn E.Polito,Lr.Govemm ♦ Chrystal Komegay,Undmeoretary March 25,2015 The Honorable Kimberley Driscoll Mayor of the City of Salem Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 RE: Local Initiative Program Local Action Units application—North River Apartments Salem Dear Mayor Driscoll: The LIP staff has completed its review of your application for Local Action Unit designation of four(4)affordable rental units of 44 total units located at North River Apartments at 28 Goodhue Street in Salem.The application is consistent with the requirements of the LAU program. The Local Initiative Program staff has reviewed your application and determined that: 1. The units will serve households with incomes at or below 80%of the area median income. 2. The City has taken action to aid in the development of the units. 3. The affordable units are restricted,ensuring they will remain affordable in perpetuity. 4. The units are subject to an affirmative and fair marketing plan. The Department of Housing and Community Development has received documentation supporting these findings. The City will be responsible for monitoring the units on a yearly basis to certify their compliance with all occupancy restrictions as outlined in the LIP LAU Regulatory Agreement for Rental Projects. Please refer to the enclosed instructions describing the documentation to be submitted by your community to DHCD to have the units added to the Subsidized Housing Inventory. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Janice Lesniak at(617)573-1327.We look forward to working with you again. Sin r J Cathe a Racer Associ Director Enc. cc: Lynn Goonin Duncan,Director,Department of Planning and Community Devleopment Elizabeth Rennard,City Solicitor Naomi Francisco,Housing Coordinator Kristen Costa,L.A.Associates,Inc. 100 Cambridge Street,Suite 300 www.mass.gov/dhcd Boston,Massachusetts 02114 617.573.1100 s L { CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Vii. o DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL . MAYOR - 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP _ DIRECrOR March 5, 2015 Glen Forward Essex Builders Corp. 400 Blue Hill Drive, Suite 2C Westwood, MA 02090 RE: 28 Goodhue tree replacement Dear Mr.Forward, In October 2014 you provided a check in the amount of$250.00 to the City of Salem as surety for replacement of a damaged tree installed at the street front of the new development.at 28 Goodhue Street. As this tree has been satisfactorily replaced by you, enclosed is a reimbursement check for the full amount of$250.00 Sincerely, Dana S.Menon V Ignan e 3 S 2` 15. Date Dana Menon From: Rick Azzalina <RAzzalina@fstinc.com> Sent: Tuesday,August 19, 2014 4:22 PM To: Dana Menon; David Knowlton Cc: Beth Debski;JRivard@fstinc.com Subject: RE: 28 Goodhue Street Attachments: Grove St Section 104+75 Rt.pdf; Grove St Align.pdf; 20430-0 24july2014.pdf; 2043C2-0 REV 18AUG2014.pdf Importance: High Hi Dana/David, The bike path in the developer's plan(s) appears to meet existing back of sidewalk elevations. Since our proposed Grove Street design reduces the roadway cross slope to 3% and, thus,requires the curb to be raised 5 inches, we will most likely need to reset this curb and rebuild this length of sidewalk all the way to the driveway. If a supplemental "as-built" survey (i.e., vertical spot grades) of this area confirms these expectations we will need to slope down from the back of proposed sidewalk to meet grade of the bike path some distance away. This will require a temporary construction easement from the private property owner. Installation of a pedestrian crossing and wheelchair ramps at this location should be deferred until we know more about the Legacy Parks development project. Regards, Rick Richard A. Azzalina, PE ( Vice President-Transportation Fay,Spofford &Thorndike(FST) 5 Burlington Woods I Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: 781.221.1221 1 Fax:781.221.1018 1 Cell:339-234-1568 ra*zzalinaCo) www.fsfnc.com I www.fsnc.com j,A Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Dana Menon [mailto:dmenon(cbSalem.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:03 PM To: James Rivard; David Knowlton Cc: Rick Azzalina Subject: RE: 28 Goodhue Street David, The bike path that Jim refers to is on the owner's property, and the owner will be responsible for maintenance. There will be a public easement put on the path allowing public access. So, it's not technically owned by the City, though it will be used by the public. Do you think FS&T needs to inspect the multiuse path? Thanks, Dana t From: James Rivard [mail to:]Rivarclil 5tinc.com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:49 PM To: Dana Menon Cc: Rick Azzalina Subject: 28 Goodhue Street Dana, Quick question for you regarding Essex Builders work at 28 Goodhue Street. As part of this project the Contractor is installing a bike path along the back portion of the property along the canal. I was wondering if I should provide inspection for the work performed here. On the other projects I have worked on in Salem inspection has been limited to work within the city owned right of way. This could be an exception as at some point I assume the Bike Path would be turned over to the City. The Contractor has begun work on grading the bike path today and should be completed by the end of the week. Please advise at your convenience. James Rivard, P.E. I Senior Engineer Fay, Spofford & Thorndike (FST) 5 Burlington Woods I Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: 781.221.1153 Cell:978.380.4860 irivard@fstinc.com www.fstinc.com The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact IT Services at 800-835-8666 and properly dispose of this information. Please consider the environment before printing this email. The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact IT Services at 800-835-8666 and properly dispose of this information. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 �k"•�k+isr z#;d �'S ~� � ��'O_�� .►�� e7V1.�9� "v y1�Nl�� AO M i _ MA Illy yyak�? ��• � 3,'�" � � `8 I �� - - '_ _ �� !,'. .* -. s w �.. « 'Y•' ' AAA} \� _ , ��. P A A n t,rz. ♦ � ��:.s �� {♦jp t k*�: ! � � L 4ya. e� ��`I �. fb i" �#•-3.%au�'��` -tYtry}g� W r. .S . .-. P r:,u* �� S '*s�� $ '"at.5 •3'Yws/,7r v ' � "y;m'�",i y - ♦•` _ t s r ,�... � ¢� 2 *",!�Jast" '{. h a'� �•*�' � , Off 5 J s e ) T Q d S'yG� tttt �, 5w •. s �Il � �'� � _ ! �`�• ,. / s��i'� + '`[" ir',.♦ Ia��Vi �L:, 1 T'4 �•< «d"lr9 , TI.�,� .ri�'t/" ,�t� CITE' OF SALEM PLANNING BOAR Decision Site Flan IBeviewi«'etlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit � North River Canal, LLC ?S Goodhue Street February 20, 3007 North River Canal, LLC C!o Joseph Correnti . 63 Federal Street Salem, MAO 1970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street ? " Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit <7 On Thursday, December 7,2006, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened aPublic Hearing regarding the application of North River Canal, LLC,282 Bennington Street, Boston, IMA under Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit for the property located at 28 Goodhue Street_The proposed project includes the construction of a new four-story mixed-use structure with 6,000 sq. ft. of commercial/retail space on the first fluor, and 44 residential condominiums on the upper floors. The public hearing was continued to December 21; 2006, January 4, 2007, January 18, 2007,February 1, 2007 and February 15, 2007. The Public Hearing was closed on February 15,2007, At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on February L5,2007, the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor(Power, Collins,Palen, Moustakis, Hansom, Ready),none (0)opposed; to approve the; application as complying with the requirements of Site Plan Review and'Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permits, subject to thefoliowmg conditions: 1. Conformance with the flan Work shall conform v+kh the plans entitled, "North River Condominium, 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, VIA" prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc.104 Lowell Street, Peabody; VLA dated November 15, 2006, and revised January 13, 2006,including pages C-L—C-I, C1.0-C1.3, Cs, AA 1. A4-A4.land A5. i { 2. Amendments Any anunendntent:s to the siie pilin shall be reviewed bs the City Planner and it deemednecessary by � the City Planner, shall be brotrdht to the Planning Board, Any Waiver or conditions contained within snail require the approval of the Planning Board. 1 t 3. .Project Delays s 220+k'asHiNG70v STrzr.T, S„,:,;tif., 02970 . r>:: 978.745.9595 F;:x: 97:3 740.0434 . 4 a d T he developer, his successors or asstgnsrshall notify the Department of_Planning and Community Development if work on the site ceases for any reason for a period of six (6) months.To this event_, the applicant shill be required to appear before the Planning Board and report to the Bo:u-d the reason(s) why work has ceased at the project and a schedule of when work will,begin aaain.atthe site, as well as a date of final project completion. If substantial work has not commenced on the. site, as deemed by the Board, and such work is not Anticipated to begin within two(2) years of the date of the Planning Board's original decision, the applicant shall notify the Board and, prior to the two-year anniversary of the issuance Of the permit, shall reoucst an extension of the permit from the Board. Applicant shall provide in;such requests any and all materials the Board may require to make a determination on the extension request, including but not limited to: studies, reports or new plans, at the applicant's expense, as requested by the Board and deemed necessary by the City Planner. 4. Signage All proposed signage shall,be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a sign permit. 5. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner and the City Electrician for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit-. c. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed by City Planner,-prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. b. Construction Practices All construction shall he carried out in Accordance with the following conditions: a. The operation of toolsor equipment used in construction or detnolition work shall occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5)' Construction and Blastimz and between the hours of 3:00 AM and 5:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. No work shall take place on Sundays or holidays. The Planning Board will Agree to changes in the starting time, at the request of the applicant and if approved by a formal vote of the City Council,as per the ordinance. h. Anybl:rstine hock crtnhirig,Jack hammeimg, hydraulic blasting, or pile dritiim, shall occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-? C51' Construction And BlastinL and be linliled to Monday-Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM There shall be no blasunga, rock crushing,jack hammering, hydraulic blasting, or pile driving on Saturdays, Sundays,or holiday's. C. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local And siate re,��ulations. � d. All reasonable action shrill he taken to minimize the negative effects of constiacuon on abutters. Advance notice Shull be provided to all Abutters in writing At least 72 flours prior to c:ommencemcnt of constiuetian of the project. '2 e. All construction vehicles and equipment Shull be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the site, f. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rales, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight at the site must be located completely on the site. It. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and Community Development, unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police Department., 7. Landscaping a. Any proposed landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Salem Cemetery&.Shade Tree Department for the selection of street trees. The selection and placement.of street trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Planning &Community Development prior to installation, c, The find landscaping plan shall be approved by the City,Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. S. Construction Traffic a. All construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within City right oi' way. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of Planning &Community Development,prior to construction. s, b. A construction traffic management plan and schedule shall be submittedtothe Department of Planning & Community. Development for review and approval pilot to the issuance of a building permit. E' c. Any roadways,driveways,or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be restored to their original condition by the applicant. d. The applicant Shull clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction sit , and lean and sweep all streets affected by their construction buck traffic as necessary. i 9. Affordable Housing Units u) The Applic int shall place an;Affordable Housing Restriction ern four (4) housing units to the ; form of a deed rider approved by the City Planner and registered with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. The affordable IIOUSInLl restric ions tine to be in .zceordance-with the eligibility criteria I for the Cornmonwcalth Department of Housing and Community Development's Subsidized housing Inventory for the purpose of ensunng„hat the hoot:(4) dwelling units will be restricted as affordable housing for households whosc annual incomes are eighty percent(80%)or less of Ana Median Income ("Low Income Households")with a sales price affordable to Low Income households for a period on ninety (90)}gears from the nate of the or iLinal conveyance. 3 K b The developer shall prepare a buyer selection plan, for app,pva 1 by the City Planner, tri-ensure compliance with affordable housing requirements. The developer into be responsible for any marketing costs and income verification. 10. Design Review Board a. The applicant shall submit final construction plans for review and approval by the:Design Review Board(DRB) priorto obtaining a building permit. b. In the final construction plans, the landscaping at the entrance to the building shall be placed four(4) feet from the entrance,its opposed to the ten (1,0) feet shown on the plan. c. The applicant shall work with and submit to the City Planner plans for a fence to be u four(4) feet tall, withstand a weight load-of-at least 1,200 lbs. and shall provide a safe'bamer between the canal and the walkway for toddlers and small children. d: Final, material simples shall be reviewed and approved by the DRB prior to_obtaining sa building permit. e_ The treatment of the storefronts should be some form of masonry from the bottom of the storefront windows to the ground. The details of the maysonrytreatment will be reviewed for conformance with the intent of the Board's recommendation when the construction drawings are submitted. f. The signage for the building and the site must be approved prior to obtaining a sign penmi,. 11. Traffic Mitigation The applicant agrees to donate S20,000 to the city of Salem for traffic improvements agdot a stud;of the area in and around Goodhue, Boston and Bridge Streets for traffic mitigation prior to the issuance of a building permit. i 12. Clerk of the Works s A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City; at the applicant, his successors prgssigns' f expense, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. 13. Salem Health Department All work shalt comply with the requirements of the,Salem Health Department, if applicable. 14. Office of the City Engineer The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with all requirements of the City F.naineer 15, Fire Department All work shall comply with the requiremen,> of the office of the Salem Building Commissioner. s f 16.Office of the Building Commissioner All work shall comply with the requirement of the Salem Fire Department: 17. Easement for Walkway � i 4 a The applicant shall prepare, and file all necessary forms and plans to secure a recreational Casement .for the use of the walkway by residents of the city of Salem that shall run with the land in perpetuity. 18. Utilities Any utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. All utilities shall be instal led,underground. 19. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. c. Maintenance of any landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two- year period. d. Maintenance of the walkway, fence and all other items and landscaping within the walkway easement and accessory to the walkway shall be the responsibility of the property owner. The property owner shall maintain this area in good condition and,in the event that any portion of the area falls into disrepair, as deemed by the City Planner, the property owner shall, upon written request of the City Planner, immediately repair, replace or restore the necessary portions of the,walkway to ensure both the safety of the use of the walkway for residents, and the aesthetic value of the area. 20. As-built Plans &Street Acceptance Plans As-built plans and Street .'acceptance plans,stamped by a Registered Profes5ional Engineer, shall be -subiluited to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of public Set-vices prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy fortile subdivision and/or the acceptance of iiv,v streets. The As-Built plans shall be SUbmicted to the City Eiigineer in electronic file format suitable for the Citv's use and approved bv the ( try Engincer, pilor to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancv for the subdivision and/or rile acceptance of stir streets. A completed tic card, a blank copy' 'Wailable,ac the Ii.ngineeraig Dq)nrrmcnt'), and i cerrificatioll Sigilccl and siallipcd by the design eriginccr,S%IrIIIg drat the work waa completed in iubswntial collipliance:arch The design dravving inuir be,s.ibinittcd to the Citi Friguicer prior to the isuance of the firial Crtiflcare of Occ'1paIlc,, -,-(,r the sal tlivision and/or the acceptance of any strcct,,'a>well as, :MY sIibsequcm rcqturcrncmS by [lie Gv; EngillLcl. 21. Violations Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation oo`.iuch condition is wakcd by a majority vote of the PLinninc-, Board, 5 w [ hereby certify that a copy of this decision and pians has been tiled "Iith the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Decision shall not take effect until a copy, of thisdecision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed. and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded to the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant,his successors or assigns. shall pay the fee for to ording or re istering. Walter B Power, III Chairman t i' t 6 i�LON�Md _ CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KrABERLEY DRiscoLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GoONIN DuNcAN,AICP DIRECTOR July 18, 2014 Thomas Galvin, AIA JD. LaGrasse &Associates, Inc. One Elm Square Andover, MA 01810 Re: Vehicular guardrail and shared use path realignment at 28 Goodhue Street development Dear Mr. Galvin, I hereby administratively approve the requested change to the location of the vehicular guardrail and the realignment of the canal-side shared use path at 28 Goodhue Street, as expressed in your July 10, 2014 letter. It is an insignificant change to the plans dated January 13, 2006, revised November 15,2006 approved by the Planning Board, and to the previously approved pedestrian fence and guardrail strategy, as described in the.Planning Board approval letter dated April 18, 2014 ("Decision of Planning Board to grant Request for Insignificant Change to vehicular barrier system"), and the Department of Planning and Community Development approval letter dated June 24, 2014 ("Re: Pedestrian fence along canal edge at 28 Goodhue Street development"). This approval allows the vehicular guardrail to be located four (4) feet from the parking curb rather than the three (3) feet indicated on plans previously approved by the Planning Board, and the path to be realigned such that it is six (6) feet from the canal wall, rather than the five (5) feet indicated on previously approved plans. The previously approved pedestrian fencing shall be installed directly adjacent to the realigned path. All other landscaping and pathway features are to remain as designed in the original submittal. Sincerely, 4 Ly Goo nin D can, AICP Director of Planning and Community Development CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS �. ?a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRIsCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ PAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DuNcAN,AICP DIREMR June 24, 2014 Thomas Galvin,AIA JD.LaGrasse &Associates, Inc. One Elm Square Andover, MA 01810 Re: Pedestrian fence along canal edge at 28 Goodhue Street development Dear Mr. Galvin, I hereby approve your submitted details for Montage II"Majestic" Industrial Ornamental steel fence by Ameristar Fence Products, to be installed between the shared use path and the canal edge, for the length of the shared use path located on the property at 28 Goodhue Street. The fence shall conform to the submitted"Montage-Ind Majestic Steel 2R 4'H Ext Panel"detail, dated 02/14/13,by Ameristar, shall be 48"in height, and shall have a black finish. Installation of the fence shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This letter serves as notice that you have complied with Condition 10 c. of the February 20, 2007 Decision of the Salem Planning Board"Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit,North River Canal, LLC,28 Goodhue Street" Sincerely, 4LGoo!tn Duncan, AICP Director of Planning and Community Development 1 i II i 4 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD April 18, 2014 North River Canal, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street, North River Apartments, Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit Decision of Planning Board to grant Request for Insignificant Change to vehicular barrier system The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, April 17, 2014 to discuss your request for the approval of an Insignificant Change to the previously approved Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit, to allow minimal modification to the vehicular barrier system along the public way. As described in the letter submitted by Thomas Galvin of JD LaGrasse & Associates, Inc. on April 16, 2014, the proposed vehicular barrier system shall be a wood guardrail, installed along the parking spaces and entry drive adjacent to the pedestrian way from the Goodhue Street driveway at the north-west corner of the property to the south-east corner of the property. The guardrail will be installed in the landscape area, 3'-0" from the curb line of the parking lot. The guardrail will be constructed from W6x9 posts embedded 4'-0" into the ground and extending 2'-0" above grade at 6'-6" O.C., the rail will be a 4x12 pressure treated member spanning a minimum of 3 posts. The Planning Board voted by a vote of 8-0 in favor (Mr. Puleo (Chair), Mr. Ready (Vice Chair), Ms. Sides, Mr. Griset, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rieder, Mr. Clarke, and Ms. Yale) and none (0) opposed, to grant the approval of the Insignificant Change request. This determination shall become part of the record for this project If you require further information, please contact Dana Menon, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning & Community Development at (978) 619-5685. Sincerely, Charles Puleo, Chairman Salem Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAx:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP DIRECTOR September 11, 2014 Thomas St. Pierre, Director Inspectional Services Department 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem, MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Certificates of Occupancy Tom, On behalf of the Planning Department, I approve the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for four(4) residential units at the 28 Goodhue development. None of these four units shall be unit numbers 209, 307, 215, or 407, as these units are being reserved for affordable housing according to the requirements of MGL 4013, and the State process for approval of these units is not complete. There are additional outstanding issues that require resolution prior to our approval of Certificates of Occupancy for the remaining units. Thank you,. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner July 10, 2014 Ms. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner, City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 Re: North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Ms. Menon I am writing to notify you of a change we are making to the vehicle guardrail due to existing conditions. We will be installing the guardrail at 4'-0"from the parking curb not 3'-0" as described in our letter to the Planning Department on April 16,2014. The light pole bases were installed last September and are located 3'-0" from the parking curb. The conduit providing power to these installations follows the 3-0"offset from parking. Because the parking stalls at the perimeter are 17'-0" deep we can not move the guardrail toward the parking stall as it would impact the depth of parking allowed by zoning. The 4'-0"offset from parking is the best location to install this barrier. Another improvement we would like to make you aware of, is the grading along the pedestrian way,which would require a steep slope from edge of walkway to top of canal wall. To lessen this impact we would like to move the pedestrian way 12"away from the canal wall toward the parking area and reduce the grading of the pathway 6"to reduce the slope along this edge. This modification would increase the planting bed on the canal side to 6'-0" and decrease the planting bed on the parking side to 4'-0". The pathway would remain 10'-0"as required. The pathway grading will be designed to promote drainage toward the parking lot to be processed through the drainage system and not impact the canal. We would like the Planning Department to view this change as an insignificant change to allow us to remain on track for completion in the scheduled time and not delay occupancy of the property. All landscaping and pathway features will remain as designed in the original submittal. Thank you for your time to review this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. Respectfully, Thomas Galvin One Elm Square T 978.470.3675 Celebration Blvd 1420 Andover,MA 01810 F 978.470.3670 Celebration,FL 34747 wim.lagraasearchitects.corn AA26001333 + , � v, �S� 2 �'�$ I��3 ��r1x 'tGl•+rt?� w.+ :ii+� �+. x . 'i ;�_�} " t+°°',� ' � 6. April 16, 2014 Ms. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner,City of Salem Department of Planning& Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Re: North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Ms. Menon, As requested, I am writing to clarify the materials and location for the wood guardrail approved by the Conservation Commission and Design Review Board. The guardrail that will be used for the vehicular barrier will be installed along the parking spaces adjacent to the pedestrian way from the Goodhue street driveway at the North-west corner of the property to the South-east corner of the property. The guardrail will be installed in the landscape area 3'-0"from the curb line of the parking lot. The guardrail will be constructed from W6x9 posts embedded 4'-0"into the ground and extending 2'-0" above grade at 6'-6"O.C., the rail will be a 4x12 pressure treated member spasming a minimum of 3 posts. I have attached a sketch of the intended gardrail. Best Regards, `Thomas Galvin One ELn Square T 978.410.3675 Celebration Blvd 1420 Andover,MA 01810 F 978.470.3670 Celebration,FS, 341V AA26001333 z z w Z n U U O W Z S n U ' Q U 0 La d)Q N -- z z �.nn 0 3 0 � V -I�Qy rnQp W� O� QQQ vow w w igow p �� O w N Q3 ,Wpn 6� aW�NN NDN x0 w 7 x0 30 Ad) y w v0- 0- l °fefe0` SALEM — NORTH RIVER ate: 16 APRIL 2014 5D�Ua1�T. re tesl e prepare NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC. tee: 1"=J'-0" .. &'�Amciat WInc ...r. 2043 jbcfiitects-(Engineers-Interiors-LanCP(anning GARDRAIL DETAIL sheet: One E!m Square,Andover,MA 01810 /�/� 7 978-470-3675 P.978-470-3670 G v ...my,o>saa.mnem.eore - e-rean:dowonoLcou CONUIT CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS AR ,�;�r9; DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP DIRECTOR June 24, 2014 Thomas Galvin, AIA JD. LaGrasse & Associates, Inc. One Elm Square Andover, MA 01810 Re: Pedestrian fence along canal edge at 28 Goodhue Street development Dear Mr. Galvin, I hereby approve your submitted details for Montage II "Majestic" Industrial Ornamental steel fence by Ameristar Fence Products, to be installed between the shared use path and the canal edge, for the length of the shared use path located on the property at 28 Goodhue Street. The fence shall conform to the submitted"Montage-Ind Majestic Steel 2R 4'H Ext Panel" detail, dated 02/14/13, by Ameristar, shall be 48" in height, and shall have a black finish. Installation of the fence shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This letter serves as notice that you have complied with Condition 10 c. of the February 20, 2007 Decision of the Salem Planning Board "Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit,North River Canal, LLC, 28 Goodhue Street" Sincerely, LZ 4LyGoonin Duncan, AICP Director of Planning and Community Development June 23 2014 Ms. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner, City of Salem Department of Planning&Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Re: North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Ms. Menon, As discussed at our June 11, 2014 site meeting,regarding the Goodhue street configuration and the redesign of the street layout. We intend to move forward with the agreed resolution to allow the curb layout to remain as installed and keep the on street parking in front of the building. Essex Builders,the contractor for the project will reset the existing curbing south of the south entrance to create a straight curb line to the bump-out create around the on-street parking spaces, approximately 75' of curbing. Fay, Spofford and Thomdike(FST)has asked the Contractor not install the crosswalks or accessible ramps shown south of the south driveway and north of the north driveway. The crosswalk in front of the main building entrance will be use,but the curbing will be reset during the street improvement project designed by FST. I believe this letter describes the resolution agreed to at our meeting and the additional conversation with the City and FST. Please let me know if I have missed anything you think was discussed and is not included in this letter. Best Regards, i�- /j dl— Thomas Galvin I One Elm Square T 978.470.3675 Celebration Blvd 1420 Andover,MA 01810 F 978.470.3670 Celebration,FL 34747 www.lagrassearchitects.com AA26001333 - - "exRlmw 1 IY.'m.lip(H WNEL RNL AbMAGEO�RNL J ✓'SQ.Ifp Pl[YET 1 p p TOP VIEW Fi { 96.00".o-w a.._. ! [96eirz•] e r w" Sys m _ 1 2 re�a"ramR- { 4 3625" [36 11C] 48.00" [48"] 36.00" 1 I; L 3.74" 4.72" [36"] [33/4"] 1 [411/16"] RECOMMENDED 7 I TYP. O.C. L, may vary .•i ! _.'i I. .. �•: depending on ':I f ' :I [ :f f II .. •. IL, .. If... 4x POST VnDTll SIDE VIEW ELEVATION VIEW �aM�lsTnttb .� `Rwa.-N" ,111E ,IJRi64lD 11A6,C31�01MQIPNEl 0 MJE �,1�. pffR .� RMWRIfO 53Y2' q I 1 2 i 3 36Y4" 48" MOATACE/r� ly'. - L oo J Eroer coATrt+D srsTea4 - �- 33/4"TYP. L ,�Nmial Uoifwmlac Cavy DI��) z;e<EsaRwR:T>�R Eyay"°°'. 36" A.Yl TR K ' DESCRIPTION I MOMUARYMFORMATpN .h.a.nem.ww�r.�wvuuansul�.Max�+®v� TWS X41 mimp 3-SQ POST •_�� F3AMERISTAR® i: °}amu° N4vuMbtlemL9JTvgiTma..�nae�.ecv _- xww.00A1MtIK QM 2 1'Yi'Sq.x 14 Ga FORERUNNER RAIL 7111,E:MONTAGE II MAJESTIC 2R EXT 4'H 4'$GL GATE 3 , 1"SQ PICKET RE4 BY CKD DAiE D¢cimDN B ns lata la. cxnxBEDcxnxxo,RAa DATE: Oa/12/10 SCALE: DNS SHEET: I/I q ( 2"SQ GATE END TDCDREAum+ER RAn. DRN BY: IAS CHK BY:Cl REV: a IGBSX3 KIT DRAWING NO:2HMX204648 r CITY OF SALEM i PLANNING BOARD Decision Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit North River Canal, LLC 28 Goodhue Street I February 20, 2007 N O O �- North River Canal,LLC , r m C/o Joseph Correnti m `- 63 Federal Street C) v Salem,MA 01970 Tm RE: 28 Goodhue Street N m 3 Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit ^' On Thursday,December 7,2006, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing regarding the application of North River Canal,LLC, 282 Bennington Street, Boston, MA under Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit for the property located at 28 Goodhue Street. The proposed project includes the construction of a new four-story mixed-use structure with 6,000 sq. ft. of commercial/retail space on the first floor, and 44 residential condominiums on the upper floors. The public hearing was continued to December 21, 2006, January 4, 2007,January 18, 2007, February 1, 2007 and February 15, 2007. The Public Hearing was closed on February 15, 2007. At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on February 15,2007, the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor(Power, Collins, Puleo,Moustakis, Hansom, Ready),none(0)opposed, to approve the application as complying with the requirements of Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permits, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform with the plans entitled, "North River Condominium, 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, MA" prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc.104 Lowell Street, Peabody, MA dated November 15, 2006, and revised January 13, 2006, including pages C-1 —C-4, C1.0-CL2, Cs, AA 1, A4-A4.Iand A5. 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 3. Project Delays - 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL: 978.745.9595 FAX: 978.740.0404 WWW,SALEM.COM The developer,his successors or assigns shall notify the Department of Planning and Community tl Development if work on the site ceases for any reason for a period of six (6)months. In this event, 1 the applicant shall be required to appear before the Planning Board and report to the Board the reason(s)why work has ceased at the project and a schedule of when work will begin again at the site, as well as a date of final project completion. If substantial work has not commenced on the site; as deemed by the Board,and such work isnot"anticipated to begin within two(2)years of the date of the Planning Board's original decision, the applicant shall notify the Board and, prior to the two-year anniversary of the issuance of the permit, shall request an extension of the permit from the Board. Applicant shall provide in such request any and all materials the Board may require to make a determination on the extension request,including but not limited to: studies, reports or new i plans, at the applicant's expense,as requested by the Board and deemed necessary by the City Planner. 4. Signage All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a sign permit. i 5. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner and the City Electrician for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed by the City Planner, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: i a. The operation of tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work shall occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5): Construction and Blasting and between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. No work shall take place on Sundays or holidays.The Planning Board will agree to changes in the starting time,at the request of the applicant and if approved by a formal vote of the City Council, as per the ordinance. b. Any blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering, hydraulic blasting,or pile driving shall occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5): Construction and Blasting-and be limited to Monday-Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. There shall be no blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering, hydraulic blasting, or pile driving on Saturdays, Sundays,or holidays. c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. 2 e. All construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the site. i I. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rules,regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight at the site must be located completely on the site. h. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and Community Development, unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police Department. 7. Landscaping a. Any proposed landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Salem Cemetery& Shade Tree Department for the selection of street trees. The selection and placement of street trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Planning&Community Development prior to installation. c. The final landscaping plan shall be approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. Construction Traffic a. All construction will occur on site;no construction will occur or be staged within City right of way. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of Planning&Community Development prior to construction. b. A construction traffic management plan and schedule shall be submitted to the Department of Planning & Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of a , building permit. C. Any roadways, driveways,or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be restored to their original condition by the applicant. d. The applicant shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site, and clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as necessary. 9. Affordable Housing Units a) The Applicant shall place an Affordable Housing Restriction on four(4)housing units in the form of a deed rider approved by the City Planner and registered with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.The affordable housing restrictions are to be in accordance with the eligibility criteria for the Commonwealth Department of Housing and Community Development's Subsidized Housing Inventory for the purpose of ensuring that the four(4) dwelling units will be restricted as affordable housing for households whose annual incomes are eighty percent(80%)or less of Area Median Income("Low Income Households") with a sales price affordable to Low Income households for a period on ninety(90)years from the date of the original conveyance. �I 3 r i 1 { The applicant shall prepare and file all necessary forms and plans to secure a recreational easement 1{I for the use of the walkway by residents of the city of Salem that shall run with the land in perpetuity. a I 1 18.Utilities i Any utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance j of a Building Permit. All utilities shall be installed underground. 19.Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. jb. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. c. Maintenance of any landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant,his successors or - 3 assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two- year period. d. Maintenance of the walkway,fence and all other items and landscaping within the walkway easement and accessory to the walkway shall be the responsibility of the property owner.The property owner shall maintain this area in good condition and,in the event that any portion of the area falls into disrepair, as deemed by the City Planner,the property owner shall, upon written request of the City Planner,immediately repair, replace or restore the necessary portions of the walkway to ensure both the safety of the use of the walkway for residents, and the aesthetic value of the area. i 20. As-built Plans & Street Acceptance Plans { As-built plans and Street Acceptance Plans,stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer,shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of and or the acceptance of an Occupancy for the subdivision / p y streets. A completed tie card,a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer,stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and/or the acceptance of any streets;as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. 21. Violations Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 5 r Ii hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are j on file with the Planning Board. The Decision shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20)days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fed for recording or registering. %A Walter B Power,III Chairman I 3 1 i 1 I 3� I 's 6 Dana Menon From: Thomas Galvin <tgalvin@lagrassearchitects.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:37 PM To: Dana Menon Cc: Lynn Duncan Subject: FW: Decorative Fence for city approval Attachments: Ameristar Montage Fence.pdf; montageII.pdf Dana, Attached is the shop drawing for the 4'-0" railing along the canal path.The sections are steel fabricated not aluminum. I have included the brochure for the manufacturer also. Let me know if you have questions or comments. Tom From: Tyler Hanchet-Leon [mailto:THanchett-Leoncalessexbuilderscorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:30 PM To: Thomas Galvin Cc: Jennifer Patel; Chris Serino Subject: Decorative Fence for city approval Tom, Jen asked me to send you the fence manufacturer and model for the city approval. Please see attached. It is the Montage II by Ameristar. Tyler Hanchett-Leon Assistant Project Manager THanchett-LeonLo)essexbuildersegM.com Essex BUILDERS CORP.AFRA 400 Blue Hill Drive; Suite 2C Westwood, MA 02090 (P)781-326-3466 x 205 (F) 781-326-3477 www.essexbuilderscorp.com 1 e � a 4 The Ornamental Iron Standard As the world's leader in ornamental fencing Ameristar Fence Products continues to deliver value added products that outperform industry standards. Montage II is the preferred choice among owners, architects, and contractors for industrial ornamental fence. Strength ® MA�E We take great pride Montage II is manufactured using a proven fusion welding in manufacturing technology. The welded design of Montage II bonds the industrial IN THE "Made in the USA" pickets at each rail intersection delivering unmatched strength. UJA products. Ameristar is located in Tulsa, Oklahoma and is American owned Appeal and operated. Montage II is available in multiple styles and heights to match Applications: any project requirement. The 1" steel picket design of Montage II > State Facilities delivers a versatile appeal by combining security with aesthetics. > Municipal Facilities > Airports Design > Water Treatment & Storage > Public Housing Authorities The Montage II ATF (all terrain fence) design can traverse over a > Parks & Recreation 50% grade change. Ameristar's E-Coat coating process protects > Stadiums & Event Centers Montage II from weathering, guaranteeing long lasting beauty and structural integrity providing a 20 year warranty. > Schools & Universities > Hospitals Covered by or for use with one or more of the following U.S.patents: 6.811.145,7071.439,7.159.853,7282.659,1.396.001,7611.510 888—333-3422 I mktg@ameristarfeni / PRODUCTSFENCE i MONTAGE II INOUSTRIAL ORNAMENTAL Panels Warranty Montage II panels are welded using pro-fusion Montage II is produced in a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility technology, a process proven in the automotive using the highest quality materials and processes. Ameristar and aerospace industries. has over 25 years of experience and research in coating and processing of ornamental fence products allowing Montage II to > 1"sq.x 14ga.PICKETS support a 20 year warranty. > 1.15"w.x 1.15"h.x 12ga.RAILS > 2.5"sq.x 12ga:/3"sq.x 12ga:POSTS Coating •naaaemeoa raaea na�em.seeaoe<rr atom iwee�aiis. I > 3',3'h',4',454',5',6',T&8' PANEL HEIGHTS Ameristar has always challenged the industry by developing and producing products with superior coatings. Montage II was developed using E-Coat technology which deposits coatings throughout the entire product, thus eliminating any risk of corrosion where typical powders will not adhere. 0 Styles Posts W Wme I ■ ■ N " „ Posts are manufactured of high tensile steel and are ■ = = ■ ■ ■ ■ galvanized inside and out for superior corrosion protection. CLASSIC" MAJESTIC" GENESIS" INVINCIBLE" Brackets Montage II brackets are designed of high strength _ stainless steel and accompanied with tamper-proof 4� r fasteners. Ameristar's bracketed design allows the - contractor to have a flawless installation and helps maintain the integrity of the coating by not welding the panels to the posts. d , GatesR P Ameristar understands the importance of balancing perimeter security with the highest quality entry control gates. Montage II has a wide variety of Swing, Slide, and Cantilever Gates to match any entry. Montage II is produced using up to 96% post-industrial recycled steel. Pp RT#9790/REV 05/20/3 I 888-333-3422 e • . / AMERISTAf Mingo1555 N. Rd. I Tulsa, Oklahoma 7411i FENCE PRODUCTS oscwrna" AHIbAGflt'RNL � tY.'X),IIm CN4vn�RAil 1 2 9RACA cT.6U N.' mu 100 TOP VIEW { $ 96.00"4—W ECOAT ttMYNG YIStFAI [, tt I u:r vrca .-- '�..td:,' -3. 2 i 3625" 1361/4"1 0.00" [48"] 36.00" I i' 1 3.74" ,• 4.72" [33/4"1 ...JJJ ..._ [411/16"] RECOMMENDED f i TYP. O.C. 1 L•. 1 I .. may vary .' ' '• I i i depending on i 3 ' :i f - :1 [ - location 4x POST WIDTH SIDE VIEW ELEVATION VIEW maE eacrtrt wlu�res�.wmvsrvnei m",na OR161: QP IM '4, . ... IMnaGW 2R1C� ------ - 53Y2" _. 2" 49%" 2" 4 ! ( . i 1 2 3 36Y4" I X(>M.14f.ff"XNC 40" 1 7 I!i 00 j OO � 3 " r econrconrP.+cSYSIEi4 ( , - - 3/4 TYP.. ' UuiGem S;m Cmuvg- (NMiAp) : i EPmY Rimxr 36t " i t x DESCRIPTION _- %2UPYCTART(h?4iMA?IO*: �,{[,7�� T�7� 1555YN741 7 3-SQ POST i e.poo"n-�.".�Kereznnx.:.e.ac.a,.d,ws AlY1L:111�1t1d\Cb �vha ON>ni;n j s.+ww"xniR-.maa..mv+"eo-"s�.m+mwd: *N9-33tNn � '.@67\tlp1lRX W'�i 2 a' I%^Sq.z 14 Ga FORERUNNER RAIL w.rx.a TITLE:MONTAGF 11 MAJESTIC 2R EXT 4'H 4'SGL GATE kE1* UY 'CRD' [u;ti OFCC:PiIU?: 3 1 7"SQ PICKET' ns DATE: 04112'16 SCALE: DNS SHBET: Itl 4 2"SQ GATE FNU I TO r RUUI.+ven wtc DRN BN JAS CHK 8Y:Cl REV: a j IGBSX3 KIT i _ ORAWRJG NO: 2HM%204648 CITY OF SALEM Y f ' PLANNING BOARD 1014 APR 22 A 10: 41 FILE o CITY CLEF,!(, SALEM. MASS April 18, 2014 North River Canal, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street, North River Apartments, Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit Decision of Planning Board to grant Request for Insignificant Change to vehicular barrier system The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, April 17, 2014 to discuss your request for the approval of an Insignificant Change to the previously approved Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit, to allow minimal modification to the vehicular barrier system along the public way. As described in the letter submitted by Thomas Galvin of JD LaGrasse & Associates, Inc. on April 16, 2014, the proposed vehicular barrier system shall be a wood guardrail, installed along the parking spaces and entry drive adjacent to the pedestrian way from the Goodhue Street driveway at the north-west corner of the property to the south-east corner of the property. The guardrail will be installed in the landscape area, 3'-0" from the curb line of the parking lot. The guardrail will be constructed from W6x9 posts embedded 4'-0" into the ground and extending 2'-0" above grade at 6'-6" O.C., the rail will be a 4x12 pressure treated member spanning a minimum of 3 posts. The Planning Board voted by a vote of 8-0 in favor (Mr. Puleo (Chair), Mr. Ready (Vice Chair), Ms. Sides, Mr. Griset, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rieder, Mr. Clarke, and Ms. Yale) and none (0) opposed, to grant the approval of the Insignificant Change request. This determination shall become part of the record for this project If you require further information, please contact Dana Menon, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning & Community Development at (978) 619-5685. Sincerely, C�" 4� /1�Charles Puleo, Cn Salem Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk April 16, 2014 Ms. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner, City of Salem Department of Planning&Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Re: North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Ms. Menon, As requested, I am writing to clarify the materials and location for the wood guardrail approved by the Conservation Commission and Design Review Board. The guardrail that will be used for the vehicular barrier will be installed along the parking spaces adjacent to the pedestrian way from the Goodhue street driveway at the North-west comer of the property to the South-east comer of the property. The guardrail will be installed in the landscape area 3'-0"from the curb line of the parking lot. The guardrail will be constructed from W6x9 posts embedded 4'-0"into the ground and extending 2'-0" above grade at 6'-6" O.C.,the rail will be a 4x12 pressure treated member spanning a minimum of 3 posts. I have attached a sketch of the intended gardrail. Best Regards, Thomas Galvin One Elm Square T 978.470.3675 Celebration Blvd 1420 Andover,MA 01810 F 978.470.3670 Celebration,FL 34747 w ww'.Iarzraeeearehiteets.mw AA26001333 Z Z W Z Z Qw 0 CL = Q CA 11 U W Z n U � Q � J e I� = I J (DC z �N N za �� z ■■nn .0 fw� m Q � V pfLQr mQ0 O w J Q Q (L Wa W w �Nw�-�—�, °oW\mom Q3 �� d) Wew � > N xV WZzp XO O �N � �w ;t pm'ecC SALEM — NORTH RIVER ate' 16 APRIL 2014 all r e Prepared NORTH RIPER CANAL, LLC. scale: 1°=r &k,.4� Inc. ti� nom.: 2043 ARh,tech=-Engineers-,D�n_Lerd�mn„n GARDRAIL DETAIL sheet. One Elm Sgwre,Andner,WA 01810 T. 2 6 978-470-3675 P.978-470-3670 m.logromeomhftMn.wm — E—maa:JDWOADLCO4 1 � i ?-(o 2 4 20oG'� ) _ -� h Pb 1--S"- 6,& Cvtbfl-S $vy;cS4-d2✓rG -j " A'La SPP �a 2 h`� h wooer VIA v ",+ 4- azo rare 1v .� 3», .►Vr F - --- -- — re: l y _ a i t y �A ` _r% - - 6 —buk _-N.aCGS 5�u, CLQ. --- --- -- --- - — m�_dd(t n' h -- - — 9CA)6n 1 � S._F>,4 L o L _fiJfLF1'�1 —'D_uc"s10Q -- _ a-- + �k f t m d r-e�i,wc47-" -s Z�s� --_ - - -- --- -- --- t _ P_ Seu_-TA(- 13)-2006 --- --- --� -- - C-- I4-C--4 G1.0 - G (_2, Cs.�_ ► I,_ 44_- t- ..L-�_�}s_ t cv+ to&-� uZoo ak4013 r,141 • y` � r � Q r J MO Y y , Y . yF� '°.o yR �{y—.+'"¢+✓j, { j{yjI,$(p, �+ (^y { I I �, j^ 'x�iy� .. >T �IIt�}�HNrg3F�' r,�E,�.-- �! F �qu ua 'a��vunnr nem vmart�` U y i 1:�iCV73��}V3s!A�i'i `F�d. Ar'C('ittectS Eno€ti��Yh �C�e?e2C�t�)�3tJkOtS€�it1Vl �v1t��`a° �l;t � 2 ? m t r: June 24, 2013 Ms.Lynn Duncan,AICP Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street 3rd Floor Salem, MA 01970 Re: North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Ms. Duncan, I am writing to request clarification for the type of protection to install along the pedestrian way we are creating along the North River. We have 2 documents from the city with 2 different guards required.The Planning Board decision dated February 20, 2007, item 10.0 requires a 4'- 0"tall fence coordinated with the City Planner.The Conservation Commission had `Additional Findings' in their Order Of Conditions#64-441,which required a "wood guard rail" along the top of the granite wall along the length of the canal. To install both protections is redundant and costly to achieve protection for pedestrian. We would like to install the 4'-0"fence alone, along the canal wall,to protect the pedestrian from accessing the canal edge. We had detailed this fence on our submission to the Planning Board as Detail 21 on drawing C1.2 (see attached).We feel this is a better installation to protect children from the edge and render the wood guard unnecessary. If the Planning Department allows the installation of the fence alone, I would ask that the requirement for a 1,200 pound load resistance be reduced.The Massachusetts Building Code under Section 1607.7.1 requires that guards be able to resist a 50 pound load per linear foot along the railing and have an impact resistance of 200 pounds at any point along the top.This may have been a typo in the writing of the decision, but I want to be sure we are designing the fence to be of adequate strength. Please let me know if you would like to meet to discuss this issue or if you have any concerns regarding this request. Thank you for your time to review this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. r *, Respectfully One Elm QaQwas Galvilz Y MA,y.... �t�` ,�,# T 975.470.3575 1420 Celebration Alyd. Aodover,MA01810 "l Y,,,/'? / F 478.470.3670 Cxlebratinn,FL 34147 AA26001333 www.iagrasserchitects.com Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-441 Page lof 6 SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEP FILE#64-441 28 Goodhue Street City of Salem,Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habitats or Rare Wildlife and Certified Vernal Pools Map (June 1, 2003) from Natural Heritage 8r Endangered Species Program(NHESP)of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife,it has been determined that this project does not occur near any habitat of state-listed rano wildlife species nor contains any vernal pools. This Omer is issued under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,M.G.L.Chapter 131,Section 40 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance,Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1—34-13, This Order permits the construction of a four story mixed use building located along the North River. The Commission approves this project with the proposed BMPs including the installation of deep sump catch basins, and a Vortechnic stormwater quality unit which will collect stormwater and separate debris from stromwater before it enters into the North River through a 15 inch pipe. There will also be a tide flex structure in the manhole which connects to the outfall pipe leading into the North River. By locating the tide flex in a manhole the structure will be able to be maintained more easily. The roof drains wiII have two exit points,a 12 inch pipe to the north and a 15 inch pipe to the east. Those drains that collect water near the HVAC and other roof top equipment will be connected to the system that runs through the Vortechnic System. The project will also include the re-grading and re-paving of the site. Debris located along the granite wall abutting the North River will also be removed as well as debris identified in the North River that may have fallen in during the demolition of the pre-existing building. along the top of the granite wall that runs the length, of the property adjacent to the North River there will be a wooden guardrail with landscaping. The Commission had concerns about potential erosion of the wall and therefore has required the applicant to submit to the Conservation Agent,details of engineered scuppers and/or conveyances to be located along the walkway directing runoff into the North River. A total 68,430 sq It of Riverfront Area will be impacted for the above referenced project. The Commission observed that the approved plans contain various notes for construction relating to handling existing drainage pipes and other items and the Commission wouldju'st like to reiterate that these notes shall be followed throughout the project. A snow management plan has been submitted to the Commission and it was approved with the following condition that snow shall not be pushed, placed,shoveled, or other wise deposited into the North River. Given the history of the site,and that it has an Activity and Use Limitation on it the Commission required that a soil management plan be submitted to the Conservation Agent at the pre-construction meeting and must be approved by the Conservation Commission or the Conservation Agent prior to start of the project. The Commission also noted that the site is located on historically filled tideland and therefore may be subject to Ch.91 jurisdiction,requiring a Ch.91 license for construction on the site. The Commission has required that the applicant receive Ch. 91 determination and/or approval and confirm compliance with the state process. GENERAL CONDITIONS I. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety(all 6 pages)at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,after the expiration of the 10-day � 0 y � ' - » / / . \ d /\\ mg >m � > )�« � / ° \ ¥ . 3 . . . .. .. ® � , � • & ,ye ! � \ | v ; { , __„ - : , : , ,2 � . _�; > Rpgt| \ mow-_s /R , a _( -��- �o +tet ._ ,_, tl iii F 'tS if t y t S �'1� is d ,� ,.. � a t, spy t �kl `- R. .i•��Etap �,b5 h E � Y 6y8�Approximare 6CI`-(7" �t E� k rr3ti � � F a M1 d 'r y F a 4 3 6 i_ooking dawn Pedestrian way location �"� � � DEstance to abutt¢7g property � ;r n i s5 �!3 hjt Yi,,Mi P. 9PL y: M :! t : A 1' j b a r � I �!�meqq { t! M y APprc�ximafe Iocatian of :± ,. M. ""�� r"f pedestrian way � � `� t � . :u r On site looking down pedestrian way towand Coodh ke�St. � Sh 3 2 _ dr ve � ' .,;3 N �'a £�ISt�nC6'' '�'Ityd�d�N� II{}ryv,�E:yt F d' NilE�iv9IEr�� txdik7Uh # A tN a. x j. f _d_Decorative Fence > '°� u Laolcing toward site across Ntrth River ca97al. "t�,• F �:'. :nf� �. is h dl� �i�� m: 3d ..:' �t E Fr p dxin !ta A�proxRmate - �aa' � �EEt i�9! a� ,+ �` � s�fl#:R!�u '.:*•i lE.a�'� ne : a ' 3a i' ,d t!� CTIRY7SIC [�YIC.�CfB _. i .y,., r- �'r': 'd3"��p��an�_m �i� �• � I��i � ,. t. � h`:'v<. : oa -ing toward site across Gaodhue St. c GF \ 14 �v C' �v GAP 16 m P \21 �y 20 LLtp �� 16 / / . Qv y i 0 P 11 Ip 12 / 20 24' 16 17H SIGN GROUND 17F (S' 1 LIGHTED 14 13 U.P. 16 17A ` oU.P. F�N`z ✓f,� 3•Y ; 5 _ pm'e6: SALEM - NORTH RIVER "010 SEPT. 2013 G f rise prepare NORtN RIVER CANAL, LLC_ sea's: 1"=20'-0" for: A A mc. lnC: - ! _ title: M 2043 ,9refiitects-Engineers-Intenoa-LandP(anning� Pedestrian Way sheet: One BGn Square,Andover,911A 01810 I __ E— fl: 978-470-.3675 T.978-470-3670 Fencing V M1�yry.lagraaaearcM1iteda.com —Eo:0MAOLCOW SCALE: '/a"=I'-0" cl2 JDLAI 2012 ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF JDLAI. RIGHTS OF USE ARE CONDITIONAL AND ARE GRANTED UNDER FULL COMPENSATION AND LIMITED TO A ONE—TIME USE TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE PROJECT ON THE SITE SO INDICATED. USE 8'-min OG OF THE `WORK AND ANY 2 DERIVATIVE WORK COVERED (W/2" P05{.5) UNDER THIS COPYRIGHT FOR OTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. T'-10" THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER ACTUAL RAL LENGTH CONSTRUCTION OR PERMIT 2 3/y" TO APPLICATION IS STRICTLY ALLOW /4" FOR HANGER 4 SCREW IRST PICKET PROHIBITED WITHOUT I SSNFIOoPnEIOPRIOR u. �llc0 0 0 N /2"5TxI4GA TOP a a BOTTOM RAILS 441 3j4" STx18 GA PICKETS PIER AND POST LEND H MAY VARY BY (20PER PANEL) SOIL TYPE,FIELDCON (TIONS AND Mark Date BETWEEN APPLICATION. Revisions 8" OG. 2" 5Tx14GA POST (SHOWN) Date 13 MAY 2013 PART NUMBER 4443-8 Saale AS NOTED POWDER COAT: SEMI-GLOSS BLACK Job No. (STD) 2043 heel No. 1?ECORATIVE FENCE 17ETAIL20 n SCALE:3/a"=1'-m" Cl2 02 G i e KNUCKLED SELVAGE a TOP ! BOTTOM (TTP.) Max 10'-00 1-5/8" OD.TOP RAIL ll8" OD.L14 POSTS (TYP.) BALL CAP WITH SET SCREW OR GA ALUM.WIRE TIES a 12" O.G.(TYP.) WELDEDTE 2-31 ORG P.OST 2" MESH CHAIN LINK FABRIC 9 8 GAJ9 GA.CO (COLOR COATED FENCE) v. 9 GA.(GALVANIZED FENCE) TENSION BAR(TYR.) TENSICN BAR BANDS/CLIPS s 12" O.:;, TENSION WIRE WITH 6 GA GALV.NOG RINGS a 18° OG� - FINISH GRADE n FABRIC e I-I/2° (MAX) SLOPE TO DRAIN Mr.) .. .. FROM FINISHED GRADE CLASS 'C' CONCRETE FOOTING COMPACTED SUBGRADE CHAIN LINK PENCE 'MTA IL11 SCALE- ° 1'70" CL2 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS STRUCTURAL DESIGN For SC I square inch=645.16 mm',I pound per square 1607.6 Truck and Bus Garages. Minimum live foot=0.0479 kN/m', 1 pound=0.004448 kN. loads for garages having trucks or buses shall be as a. Floors in garages or portions of buildings used forthe specified in AASHTO Standard for H2O-44 and storage of motor vehicles shall be designed for the HS20-44 Truck loadings, and for lane loads, but uniformly disuibutedlive loads of Table 1607.1 orthe shall not be less than 100 pounds per square foot Col(1)f for pconceassenger rated toad (4.80 kN/m'), unless other loads are specifically (1) for passenger cars accommodating not more than nine passengers,3,000 pounds acting on an Justified. Actual loads shall be used where they are area of 4.5 inches by 4.5 inches; greater than the above specified loads. (2) for mechanical parking structures without slab 1607.6.1 Truck and Bus Garage Live Load or deck which are used for storing passenger Application. Lane loads shall be applied in aisles vehicles only,2,250 pounds per wheel. and ramps, as specified in AASHTO Standard. b. The weight of books and shelving shall be computed Truck loads shall be applied in aisles,ramps, in using an assumed density of 65 pounds per cubic foot parking spaces,and berths, in positions that will and convened to a uniformly distributed load; this load shall be used if it exceeds 150 pounds per square maximize load effects. foot. The 150 psf load requirement does not apply to 1607.6.2 Horizontal Forces. Longitudinal forces libraries that are incidental to other uses. and curb forces shall be as specified in AASHTO c. Design in accordance with the ICC Standard on Standard. Vehicle barriers shall be designed for a Bleachers, Folding and Telescopic Seating and concentrated 10,000 Ib lateral force acting at a Grandstands. minimum height of two feet-zero inches above a d. Other uniform loads in accordance with an approved floor or ramp. method which contains provisions for truck loadings shall also be considered where appropriate. 1607.7 Loads on Handrails,Guards,Grab Bars e. The concentrated wheel load shall be applied on an and Vehicle Barriers. Handrails,guards,grab bars, area of 20 square inches. and vehicle barriers shall be designed and f. Minimum concentrated load on stair treads(on area of constructed to the structural loading conditions set four square inches)is 300 pounds. forth in 780 CMR 1607.7. g. Where snow loads occur that are in excess of the _ design conditions,the structure shall be designed to U607.71-Handrails_and Cuard� Handrail support the loads due to the increased loads caused by assemblies and guards shall be designed to resist� drift buildup or a greater snow design determined by a load of <100 pounds per lineal foot-for the building official. See 780 CMR 1608.0. For rgrandstands,stadia,arenas,and similar structures special-purpose roofs,see 780 CMR 1607.11.2.2. 'u'sed for public assembly,,and 50 pounds per 1607.4 Concentrated Loads. Floors and other linear foot(pound-p_— (0.73 kN/m),for other similar surfaces shall be designed to support the uses pplied in any direction at the top and to uniformly distributed live loads prescribed in transfer this load through the supports to the 780 CMR 1607.2 or the concentrated load,in pounds structure. (kilonewtons), given in Table 1607.1, whichever Exception. For one- and two-family produces the greater load effects. Unless otherwise dwellings, only the single, concentrated load specified, the indicated concentration shall be required by 780 CMR 1607.7.1.1 shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed on a floor or applied. roof over an area of 2.5 feet square [6.25 ft' (0.58 1607.7.1.1 Concentrated Load. Handrail> m')] and shall be located so as to produce the assemblies and guards shall be-able-to-resist's maximum load effects in the structural members. single-coneenfiated-load:of 300-pounds--fob The aforementioned distribution of concentrated grandstands,:stadia;—_arenas;:.and-=siffidat] load does not apply for concentrated load applied to structures used-tor public_assembly,-and-207 framing members, scuttles, skylight ribs, hung pounds-(0.89-kN)for.othet�uses;a pplied inany, ceiling supports,comites,and similar elements for direction at_any_point-along_the top.and-h_ ave which there is no deck to distribute load. attachment devices and supporting structure to transfer this loading to appropriate structural 1607.5 Partition Loads. In office buildings and in elements of the building. This load need not be other buildings where partition locations are subject assumed to act concurrently with the loads to change, provision for partition weight shall be specified in 780 CMR 1607.7 1. made, whether or not partitions are shown on the construction documents, unless the specified live 1 llitho1.2 Components. 4ntetmlusters-and load exceeds 80 pounds per square foot (3.83 (alhthose_except�the_handrail),-balusters=and kN/m'). Such partition load shall not be less than a panel-fillers shall-be_designed to withstand-a-? uniformly distributed live load of 20 pounds per horizontally-applied normal load of 200pounds-Z square foot (0.96kN/m'). Partition loads are non- (0 88 kN)onan area equal to one square-foot (305-i-mm).including--openings=and-=space reducible live load. between-rails.—Reactions due to this loading are not required to be superimposed with those 8/22/08 (Effective 9/1/08) 780 CMR-Seventh Edition 393 I 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE of 780 CMR 1607.7.1 or 1607.7.1.1. feet (37.16 in') or more are permitted to be 1607.7.2 Grab Bars, Shower Seats and designed for a reduced live load in accordance Dressing Room Bench Seats. Grab bars,shower with the following equation: seats and dressing room bench seat systems shall be designed to resist a single concentrated load of EQUATION 16-21 250 pounds(1.11 kN)applied in any direction at L =Lo 0.25 + 15 any point. KLL`4T 1607.7.3 Vehicle Barriers. Vehicle barrier systems for passenger cars shallbe designed ion 4.57 resist a single load of 7,000 pounds (31.2 kN) For SL L =L 0.25 + — _-� o applied_horizontally in any direction to thc�barrien KLLAT system and shall:have anchorage or,attachment where: capable of transmitting this load to the structure) L = Reduced design live load per square foot For design of the system, the load shall be (meter)of area supported by the member. assumed to act at a minimum height of one foot, L�= Unreduced design live load per square foot six inches (457 mm) above the floor or ramp (meter) of area supported by the member (see surface on an area not to exceed one square foot Table 1607.1). (305 nim'), and is not required to be assumed to Kra = Live load element factor (see Table act concurrently with any handrail or guard 1607.9.1). loadings specified in the preceding paragraphs of A,=Tributary area,in square feet(squaremeters). 780 CMR 1607.7.L Garages accommodating L shall not be less than 0.50Lo for members trucks and buses shall be designed in accordance supporting one floor and L shall not be less than with an approved method that contains provision 0.40L„ for members supporting two or more for traffic railings. floors. 1607.8 Impact Loads. The live loads specified in TABLE 1607.9.1 LIVE LOAD ELEMENT 780 CMR 1607.2 include allowance for impact FACTOR K conditions. Provision shall be made in the structural design for uses and loads that involve unusual ELEMENT KLL vibration and impact forces. Interior columns 4 1607.8.1 Elevators. Structural supports for Exterior columns without cantilever slabs 4 elevators, dumbwaiters, escalators and moving Edge columns with cantilever slabs 3 walks shall be designed for the loads and within Comer columns with cantilever slabs 2 the limits of the deflection specified in the Board Edge beams without cantilever slabs 2 Elevator Regulations (524 CMR 1.0 through Interior beams 2 34.0),listed in 780 CMR 35.00. (In accordance All other members not identified above including: with 524 CMR,all suspended elevator loads shall Edge beams with cantilever slabs be increased 100%for impact). Cantilever beams 1607.8.2 Machinery. For the purpose of design, Two-way slabs 1 the weight of machinery and moving loads shall Members without provisions for be increased as follows to allow for impact: continuous shear transfer normal to I. elevator machinery, 100%; theirs an 2. light machinery, shaft- or motor-driven, 1607.9.1.1 Heavy Live Loads. Live loads that 20%; exceed 100 pounds per foot squared (4.79 3. reciprocating machinery or power-driven kN/m') shall not be reduced except the live units,50%. loads for members supporting two or more Percentages shall be increased where specified by floors are permitted to be reduced by a the manufacturer. maximum of 20%,but the live load shall not be 1607.8.3 Hangers. Live loads on hangers less than Las calculated in 780 CMR 1607.9.1. supporting floors,balconies,stairs,walkways,or 1607.9.1.2 Passenger Car Garages. The live platforms shall be multiplied by an impact factor loads shall not be reduced in passenger vehicle of 1.33. garages except the live loads for members 1607.9 Reduction in Live Loads. The minimum supporting two or more floors are permitted to uniformly distributed live loads,L,,,in Table 1607.1 be reduced by a maximum of 20%,but the live are permitted to be reduced according to the load shall not be less than L as calculated in 780 CMR 1607.9.1.1 through 1607.9.1.7. 780 CMR 1607.9.1. 1607.9.1 General. Subject to the limitations of 1607.9.1.3 Assembly Occupancies. Live 780 CMR 1607.9.1.1 through 1607.9.1.7, loads of 100 pounds per foot squared (4.79 members for which a value of K„.q,�is 400 square kN/m')or less shall not be reduced in assembly 394 780 CMR-Seventh Edition 8/22/08 (Effective 9/1/08) MON,,t"'i T .+. i *x iii 1 2 N ii I�� is y+P ii vnwv�;wfl Si i i 3k t C F '$ .f p� .$...C` � .,3�J ,' �SrL�A_. j--D At hit, cd, E"n;ttt s ,T',•.'? y i tj�C x ip : I(' 3i 4e- !. , June 24, 2013 Ms. Lynn Duncan,AICP Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street 3rd Floor Salem, MA 01970 Re: North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Ms. Duncan, I am writing to request clarification far the type of protection to install along the pedestrian way we are creating along the North River. We have 2 documents from the city with 2 different guards required.The Planning Board decision dated February 20, 2007, item 10.0 requires a 4'- 0"tall fence coordinated with the City Planner. The Conservation Commission had 'Additional Findings' in their Order Of Conditions#64-441,which required a "wood guard rail" alongthe top of the granite wall along the length of the canal. To install both protections is redundant and costly to achieve protection for pedestrian. We would like to install the 4'-0"fence alone, along the canal wall,to protect the pedestrian from accessing the canal edge. We had detailed this fence on our submission to the Planning Board as Detail 21 on drawing C1.2 (see attached).We feel this is a better installation to protect children from the edge and render the wood guard unnecessary. If the Planning Department allows the installation of the fence alone, I would ask that the requirement for a 1,200 pound load resistance be reduced.The Massachusetts Building Code under Section 1607.7.1 requires that guards be able to resist a 50 pound load per linear foot along the railing and have an impact resistance of 200 pounds at any point along the top.This may have been a typo in the writing of the decision, but I want to be sure we are designing the fence to be of adequate strength. Please let me know if you would like to meet to discuss this issue or if you have any concerns regarding this request. Thank you for your time to review this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. Respectfully, Onc Elm Qqawas Galvin ; AIA f 'I' 978.470.3675 I420 WchraUon Blvd, Andover,MA 01810 7 '` J> F 978A70.3670 Celebration,FL 34747 AA26001333 www.lagrassea3chitects.com Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-441 Page lof 6 SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEP FILE#64-441 28 Goodhue Street City of Salem,Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habitats or Rare Wildlife and Certified Veinal Pools Map (June 1, 2003) from Natural Heritage &Endangered Species Program(NHESP)of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife,it has been determined that this project does not occur near any habitat of state-listed rare wildlife species nor contains any vernal pools. This Order is issued under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,M.G.L.Chapter 131,Section 40 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance,Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1—34-13, This Order permits the construction of a four story mixed use building located along the North River. The Commission approves this project with the proposed BMPs including the installation of deep sump catch basins, and a Vortechnic stormwater quality unit which will collect stormwater and separate debris from stromwater before it enters into the North River through a 15 inch pipe. There will also be a tide flex structure in the manhole which connects to the outfall pipe leading into the North River. By locating the tide flex in a manhole the structure will be able to be maintained more easily. The roof drains will have two exit points,a 12 inch pipe to the north and a 15 inch pipe to the east. Those drains that collect water near the HVAC and other roof top equipment will be connected to the system that runs through the Vortechnic System. The project will also include the re-grading and re-paving of the site. Debris located along the granite wall abutting the North River will also be removed as well as debris identified in the North River that may have fallen in during the demolition of the pre-existing building. Along the lop of the granite wall that runs the length of the property adjacent to the North River there will be a wooden guardrail with landscaping. The Commission had concerns about potential erosion of the wall and therefore has required the applicant to submit to the Conservation Agent,details of engineered scuppers and/or conveyances to be located along the walkway directing runoff into the North River. A total 68,430 sq ft of Riverfrout Area will be impacted for the above referenced project. The Commission observed that the approved plans contain various notes for construction relating to handling existing drainage pipes and other items and the Commission would just like to reiterate that these notes shall be followed throughout the project. A snow management plan has been submitted to the Commission and it was approved with the following condition that snow shall not be pushed, placed,shoveled, or other wise deposited into the North River. Given the history of the site,and that it has an Activity and Use Limitation on it the Commission required that a soil management plan be submitted to the Conservation Agent at the pre-construction meeting and must be approved by the Conservation Commission or the Conservation Agent prior to start of the project. The Commission also noted that the site is located an historically filled tideland and therefore may be subject to Ch.91 jurisdiction,requiring a Ch.91 license for construction on the site. The Commission has required that the applicant receive Ch. 91 determination and/or approval and confirm compliance with the state process. GENERAL CONDITIONS I. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety(all 6 pages)at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,after the expiration of the 10-day b) The developer shalt prepare a buyer selection plan, for approval by the City Planner, to ensure compliance with affordable housing requirements.The developer is to be responsible for any marketing costs and income verification. 10.Design Review Board a. The applicant shall submit final construction plans for review and approval by the Design Review Board(DRB)prior to obtaining a building permit. b. In the final construction plans, the landscaping at the entrance to the building shall be placed four(4)feet from the entrance, as opposed to the ten (10)feet shown on the plan. c. The applicant shall work with and submit to the City Planner plans far a'fence to be a four(4) feet tall,withstand a weight load of at least 1,200 lbs. and shall provide a 'safe barrier between the canal and the walkway for toddlers and small children. d. Final material samples shall be reviewed and approved by the DRB prior to obtaining a building permit. e. The treatment of the storefronts should be some form of masonry from the bottom of the storefront windows to the ground.The details of the masonry treatment will be reviewed for conformance with the intent of the Board's recommendation when the construction drawings are submitted. f. The signage for the building and the site must be approved prior to obtaining a sign permit. 11. Traffic Mitigation The applicant agrees to donate$20,000 to the city of Salem for traffic improvements and/or a study of the area in and around Goodhue, Boston and'Bridge Streets for traffic mitigation prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City,at the applicant, his successors or assigns' expense, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. 13.Salem Health Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Health Department, if applicable. 14. Office of the City Engineer The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer 15. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the office of the Salem Building Commissioner, M Office of the Building Commissioner All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 17. Easement for Walkway 4 v i I KNUCKLED SELVAGE a TOP BOTTCM (TYPE Max 1®'-0" %I-518" O.D.TOP RAIL 1!8" OD-LIN POSTS (TYP) BALL GAP WITH SET SCREW OR -- GA.ALUM .WIRE TIES a IV' OG.(TYPI WELDED TER'4INAL RJER POST ' 2-s18" ate. G v 2"MESH CHAIN LINK FABRIC 8 GA/9 GA.CORE (COLOR COATED FENCE) v 9 GA(GALVANIZED FENCE) TENSION BAR(T7P-) TENSION BAR BANDS/CLIPS s la" O.G. TENSICN WIRE WITH ro GA. GALV.HOG RINGiS a 18" O.C. e FINISH GRADE � FABRIC a I-1)1" (MA)c.) ^' ,�` SLOPE TO DRAIN (TYP-) FROM FINISHED GRADE CLASS 'C' CONCRETE FOOTING —COMPACTED SUBGRADE CHAIN LINK PENCE PETAL 21 SCALE:V-V-01' CL2 Y , 14 p� 3. 16 �V lx O21 y 20 l Fr — — N b' 11 ITS 12 20 \��\� 24, 16 17H 17F / RRODUND cS LIGHTED 14 13 U.P. ,6 I / 26 ^ 17A OUR LO p "°*" SALEM - NORTH RIVER 'a"10 SEPT. 2013 ores NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC. scale: 1"=20'–O" Sc"ASOC18 Inc. z r 7 e n 0 0 2043 Architects-Eyineers-Sntenars-LandTfanning Pedestrian Way sheet: One Erin Square,Andover,90 01810 C. T 978-470-3675 T.978-470-3670 Fencing— E—.%JMk*AC MAp.bpimwrch%ecb.com L.CW a Approximate 60'-0" distance Chainlink Fence Decorative Fence Looking toward site across North River canal. Approximate 60'-0" Distance Y Decorative Fence to mimic Bridge Guard rail Looking toward site across Goodhue St. .1 1 - • ..ter,.. F—ITITOTTS 74 M m - .191 imimVilleft .. „ r ?a'a'��^.. � + ,✓f� a,�` A, i3�1 P ��p�,i iii �� r TM Mllil G. x . a 'F JA #' p f � y 2 s X. }• {,,may' 1wC 't "yL'�""✓` � .6g. .`g+. •+ j t. N's.`-yp. .+. .�'..f�er!*�tl�,..sxmS:Fi^• w �.,...CC + '"'v„S" � ,v t� ` .'$'�' . �+, SCALE:31a'Y'-O" Cls JDLAI _2012 Q ALL PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF JDLAL RIGHTS OF USE ARE CONDITIONAL AND ARE GRANTED UNDER FULL COMPENSATION AND LIMITED TO A ONE—TIME USE TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE PROJECT ON THE SITE SO INDICATED. USE OF THE 'WORK AND ANY O2 DERIVATIVE 'WORK COVERED (W/2" Posts) UNDER THIS COPYRIGHT FOR OTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. Ti_10n THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER ACTUAL RAL LENGTHCONSTRUCTION OR PERMIT To APPLICATION Is STRICTLY I n 2 3ja'I PROHIBITED 'WRHOUT PRIOR ALLOW is FOR HANGER d SCREW IRST PICKET WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JDLAI. M LUPO 0 0 in W3"STXI4GA TOP e 6 BOTTOM RAILS Sia" STxl8 GA,PICKETS PIER AND POST LEND N MAY VARY BY (20 PER PANED SOIL TYPE,FIELD ITION5 AND Mak Date 3g BETWEEN APPLICATION, Revisions 4 " O.G. 5r2" 5Txl4GA POST (SHOWN) Date 13 MAY 2013 PARI NUMBER 4443-8 Scale POWDER COAT- AS NOTED SEMI-GLOSS BLACK a a. 2043 (STD.) neet No. MCORATIVE PENCE MTAIL20 SCALE:3/s".I'-0" C12 ClI ■ I I - i I I IQAMED SELVAGE • TOP t BOTTOM (TYP) Max 10'-0" 1-5/8" OD.TOP RAIL 1/8" OD.L FOOTS (TYP) BALL CAP WITH SET SCREW OR GA ALL1 W RE TIES • 12" OL,(TYP) WELDEDPOST 2E3/8"O SCFL40 GEALV. 2"MESH CHA�IINNp RLLEIIW FABRIC 9 8 Cao VANIZEDC OCRE/COATED FENCE) -v TENSION BAR(TYP) TENSION BAR BANDS/CLIPS a 12" O.C. TENSION WIRE WITH 6 GA GALV.HOG RINGS • 18" O.C. ® FINISH GRADE SLOPE TO DRAM (TYP) F7 FABRIC a I-IR" (MAX) FROM FINISHED GRADE CLASS 'C'CONCRETE FOOTING COMPACTED SUBGRADE CHAIN LINK FENCE tMTAIL2I 5CALE:3J6"=I'-0" C12 A f €. 3 October 23, 2013 Ms. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner, City of Salem Department of Planning &Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Ms. Menon, The project is progressing well and site work is about to start final grading. Attached is a sketch plan (by Williams and Sparages) showing the grading along the pedestrian way. The top of canal wall varies from elevation 7.0' to 9.6', where the majority of the wall exists below 8'. 'The grading for the pedestrian way is designed to have a finish grade from 11.3' to 9.8'. This will produce an elevation change of 1.5' to 2' from top of wall to the surface of the walkway. On the drawing a detail is shown for a"Rip Rap Slope"where the fence line has been moved from the back of canal wall to the edge of the pedestrian walkway. If the fence were left at the back of wall the slope would collect debris and the walkway would be hazardous with the open edge adjacent to it. The landscaping and light fixtures that were associated with this strip will be moved to the property side of the walkway, One concern I have with the using the rip rap detail is that sediment will deposit in the voids of the rocks and weeds will grow along this edge. Because the fence creates a`barrier, this area will not be easily maintained. I would like your opinion on the use of bituminous pavement for the slope along the walkway,to minimize the maintenance of this strip and stabilize the slope. I have attached a sketch(SK-08) to illustrate the section at the walkway. . Thank you for your time, I will contact you to discuss this matter Respectfully, Thomas Galvin One Ella Square, T 9741.470.3675 Celebration BIvd 1426 Aid dover,MA 01810 F 978.4.70.3670 Celebration,FL 34747 wwly.+segrtts:h*arti3siteetr.r•r;sn A.A 26661333 Z a l s h 0 LLI Q m U O � U Y O eQ F N m W LLI Q Ln W W Z Q W _ () —1 c0 7 w p OZa m Dw � w � Z 0 U u,rrn project SALEM - NORTH RIVER dae 23 OCT.. 2073 , �a �][ as (e; p,apare NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC, scale: "=a' -o" or.. &"Associates, Inc s t, �oa3 Architects rEngmeers-ILttenors LandPlannmg Pedestrian Way sheet. One rEhn Square,Andover,94,q 01810 7978-470-3675 rE 978-470-3670 K��1�rrO. ., ww.lograssearchitects.com — E—mail: JDIAI®AOLCOH _Y w� LEGEND 7H RIVER CANAL '✓"'-" NCR mPvevom+elx.w cwc. p� !y "' » Oi ® CaNG PW,P9.Ea GN S1 F ERJF�pED Lldrt Pole � � RO, P HXAERIT L{�E � ELGE R PPYII01i 1 Glpm le 1° auN Lnet rs•.ws • - - GECCRAilYE 14TPL fEiKP � �� t e a— Def4 CR eILMN (eEE NMFf GI�PII /� ��B1RIf£Pf1£m LR WNpWr /� • e 9'-0• ae � \ • EYILOPG Fl1,RNICE 11' •6' rem' M� I Q IIIILIT'P•YE y � m 0In � Oaaxl+ePPm nE v P O + t COIL- U 10 5�� 1 Ae P 1 w O Iai i O � I � IC eE� / .e(am emcrMm n A 3 Q A,g I el¢L wore I, FY' & i In Bran�w-.IPL ° w m eo un eam rseroanPL y' pp , II \� n• ' uou.LLnn wne i —y_ Z g I 1 �4 a a a e eee r Y R �. lem>wweto.r a vxos 1 n' bSSSA W 7 O�7-7—itl �0 ��'.,q� n A'i `J�iY JOLAI 2012 �mx'w ,n- ARO uP. e abr• 1%TGCn'LPE I NEW Bb¢WW[B GOODHUE STREETRON-OR PERI I I / 1=l0 zaa C1 .0 .Y p m� m cj 8 w 8 k O O \(.• \\\\\ oy Q9 Ax 1 ti o ab <O 0 n AA b \ � P \ \\; .. moo/ I`;\111 WIc w o> F^ C•. ....- II r I @ I.. �• .,1 \�\ D 11 m 0 7 v r 1 Frl --j . p 1 �E•: R<J° A�A •'1� p� �� 0 O"o\fit\ 000 \\ \ O O W0 \ \ 1 � o XiI11' I \ \ l 1 0 11 T m \ <0 11,.1 I A V 1 hl l Q I \ \ 1 n 1 1 0\ \ D \ � p I I v� V A 1 11 s x u e x 1 m � hl I11<m \ \ II ✓O <0 o Go I \ � ;•"�1� i �� :�v Cv Syr / x j O T n (n F'I O 13 v Ln °0°<o O X . m o n \t D �o r X o > a$ \ 1 a\\ � _aFn I \ � ..� ��;'� � s•� 111 .\\�\\ FT1 'm V O r ti \\ m0 o \\\ V 0 u u m o \\ SE \\ •\ \ m� ;m m > = €f DETAIL m � > m / n Designed By RLW Dawn 6y.IN SKETCH PLAN ,p''^ AbFileetlBy:RLW PrulectManager:cps SHOWING PROPOSED WALKWAY GRADING A7 d WILLIAMSYYIlob File Number: 541E-0010 Oxner. `/`/..y� #28 GOODHUE STREET,SALEM,MA 01970 SPARAGES Ornring File Folder SA F10 NORTH RNER CANAL,LL[ 181 BFNNINOTON STREET —. FAST BOSTON,MA 02128 I one 1038 cwN Sf9EEf o s' 30• 20 DRAWING: GR-1 sNl1p3 Dawing Issued for ReNew Only m EMOOIM9 S FMOxONf.(918 19>8)539-8088 �Drdwing lSSuetl for Penni[ $G1LE'1'=10' Fu:(979)767-8579 ®Drawing Issued for Conswaion SHEET 1 OF 1 N0, REVISION DATE SEPTEMBER 12,2013 ,haIWW S :T/MIK / - - --- \ 28dti� z rt ,F Dana Menon From: Thomas Galvin <tgalvin@lagrassearchitects.com> Sent: Monday.Auaust 18, 2014 11:42 AM _ To: Dana Menon;Joseph Correnti Subject: RE: updated plans for 28 Goodhue Attachments: 2043C2-0 REV 18AUG2014.pdf Dana, Attached is the revised landscaping plan to include salt tolerant plantings along the canal. Tom From: Dana Menon [mai Ito:dmenonCa@Salem.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:16 PM To: Joseph Correnti; Thomas Galvin Subject: updated plans for 28 Goodhue Tom &Joe, I am drafting the approval letters for 28 Goodhue, based on the Planning Board meeting last week. I believe you were going to submit revised plans to me, to reflect the approved changes to the building footprint,the path layout, the riprap material, and the plantings. I would like to reference these plans in my approval letters, so that the most accurate and up-to-date plans are on record. After the meeting I realized that the planting plan you submitted at the meeting did not contain any plant quantities, or label the specific plant materials. I will need a plan with that information on it. If you will remember, it was noted by the Board that any plantings within the canal bank area subject to flooding should be salt-tolerant species. Thank you, Dana Dana S. Menon, RLA Staff Planner, City of Salem Department of Planning &Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3"' Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Phone: 978 619 5685 1 Fax: 978-740-0404 dmenon a selem.com I salem.com 1 t CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 181gSEP II P 3: 5l FILE # CITY CLERK, SALEM.MASS. September 11, 2014 North River Canal, LLC C/o Joseph Cor•enti, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street (Map 16, Lot 372),North River Apartments, Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit Decision of Planning Board to grant Request for Insignificant Change to alignment of multiuse pathway,use of erosion-resistant materials along the slope above the canal wall, and related modifications to plantings in these areas. The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, August 7, 2014 to discuss your request for the approval of an Insignificant Change to the previously approved Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit, to allow the realignment of the multiuse pathway, use of erosion-resistant materials along the slope above the existing canal wall, and related modifications to the plantings in these areas. A letter submitted by Thomas Galvin of JD LaGrasse&Associates, Inc. on July 24, 2014, states that the re-grading of the multiuse pathway requested by the Conservation Commission resulted in a steeper slope between the pathway and the top of the canal wall. Portions of this slope will be subject to seasonal flooding. The flooding in combination with the steep slope would erode any soil or mulch in the area, and damage plantings. As a result,the petitioner requests approval to use rip rap along this sloped area, and to move the pathway at the east of the property to be farther from the canal wall, in order to reduce the slope between the pathway and the canal. The plantings originally proposed for the length of the slope between the pathway and the canal would be relocated to this area. The petitioner submitted photos of past seasonal flooding,the proposed rip rap material, and revised plans"Site Improvement Plan" sheet C1.0 and"Landscaping Plans" Sheet C2.0 dated May 13,2013 revised July 24, 2014. The Board requested that salt-tolerant plantings be used in the sloped area at the east end of the site,noting that the plantings may be subject to seasonal flooding. The Planning Board voted six (6) in favor(Mr. Puleo—Chair, Ms. Yale, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Mr. Clarke, and Mr. Griset) and none (0)opposed, to grant the approval of the Insignificant Change request, approving the realignment of the multiuse pathway, use of rip rap along the slope above the existing canal wall,and related modifications to plantings in these areas, as shown on the"Site Improvement Plan"(sheet C1.0)and the "Landscaping Plan" (sheet C2.0) dated May 13, 2013 and revised July 24, 2014. This determination shall become part of the record for this project ' 4 If you require finther information, please contact Dana Menon, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning& Community Development at (978) 619-5685. Sic rely, Charles Puleo, Chaman Salem Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk -2- ....,wavemi hS u, }� t July 24. 2014 fir. Tom Devine ra,� T � (� 'ant 6 a Salem Conservation Commission T ' 120 Washington Street 3rd Floor Salem, MA 01970 Re' North River Apartments, 28 Goodhue Street Mr. Devine. As discussed atoursite"meeting oil`E`uesdav, the modifications described in my letter oil July 10, 2014 did not achieve the desired result to minimize the impact of the sloped grade between the pedestrian way and the canal wall. The grading plan from our original submittal was revised to accommodate the Conservation Commissions request that the pathway be drained back into the parking lot to process through the site drainage system. To do this the pathway was raised more than 2 feet in some areas.Additionally we do not want to impact the existing canal wall, so all placed material starts from the back of the canal wall. This is creating slopes in excess of 20 degrees (Section A,B, C and,M). i have provided images of the high water that happened last December. This high water would erode soil or mulch that is placed along the lower portion of the slope and may destabilize the pathway. We are asking to use rip rap stone along the most severe"slope from Goodhue Street for 300' where the landscaping area widens. The rip rap would be stones from 3"-9" dimension (see attached images) which would be placed on the slope to provide erosion control from high water and stabilize the edge of pathway. We would like to relocate the path on the east edge of the property to reduce the slope(Section Dl sheet C1.0)and create a landscape area where the vegetation that was not installed in the rip rap area will be, installed. I have provided a-revised CLO drawing showing the relocation of the pathway and sections through the pathway to illustrate the slope adjacent to pathway and a revised landscaping plan to illustrate thevegetationthat will be moved from the:rip rap area. Thank you for your time to review this matter. f look forward to hearing from you. Respectfully, Thomas Gah-in One,Elio Square 'r 978•A?0.36'5. Cc6•bration J3lvd 11:?0 Andaeo,,MA 0181.0 li 978.V,0.36710 Cek,bialion,FL 3-67.13' u'cu 1,3,>'!"`Sti1L;uUC_3 oto AA26001333 July 24, 2014 Ms. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner, City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Modification Ms. Menon As discussed at our site meeting on Tuesday,the modifications described in my letter on July 10,2014 did not achieve the desired result to minimize the impact of the sloped grade between 'the pedestrian way and the canal wall. The grading plan from our original submittal was revised to accommodate the Conservation Commissions request that the pathway be drained back into the parking lot to process through the site drainage system. To do this the pathway was raised more than 2 feet in some areas. Additionally we do not want to impact the existing canal wall, so all placed material starts from the back of the canal wall. This is creating slopes in excess of 20 degrees (Section A, B, C and D2). I have provided images of the high water that happened last December. This high water would erode soil or mulch that is placed along the lower portion of the slope and may destabilize the pathway. We are asking to use rip rap stone along the most severe slope from Goodhue SiiGet for 300' where the landscaping area widens. The rip:ap would be stones from 3"-9"dimension(see attached images)which would be placed on the slope to provide erosion control from high water and stabilize the edge of pathway. We would like to relocate the path on the east edge of the property to reduce the slope(Section Dl sheet C1.0) and create a landscape area where the vegetation that was not installed in the rip rap area will be installed. I have provided a revised C1.0 drawing showing the relocation of the pathway and sections through the pathway to illustrate the slope adjacent to pathway and a revised landscaping plan to illustrate the vegetation that will be moved from the rip rap area. Thank you for your time to review this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. Respectfully, Thomas Galvin One Elm Square T 978.470.3675 Celebration Blvd 1420 Andover,MA 01810 F 978.470.3670 Celebration,FL 34747 wtvw,lagrassearchitectsxom AA26001333 ��X14 • ar_t � �--- �' ._ _ ,\ '�` :. ♦ ,- ..- 1 K.��a�. , A.i' ..ti_ q _ ..•tet � � ? "� A Ile � - �` s�..`L]1Z'.�'" - Y -�"Com` � r .\ to t : ,`• '. ` . . �• : \ oqy;,. _ r k_w ` q ♦/ µ/ . 1 x +777 •' „ _ JY"a�� _ 1 -Az i11t—'-- �.nJ."�„ •dam _ r y/�' �g� • 4�L •jr ^. .F" .'i 3 r l'f#'�, , •. .l fr e# :r X � y - ..it.. . stj �A , f.'?.r r it��•r � � i ,=J � rS..Y'.7 � �t f' �. jr wft MAI JI - S'�y'i �. ,tom.-�: ' , :'a 1,,,. 1 ♦ ,,,, ,y Pl.A1�lTIt�Cx .� ANAL QTY ID BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENT � I-, c RAVER - AR AGER RUBRUM RED MAPLE 3"MN o NORTH - AP ACER PAL.MATIIM JAPANESE MAPLE 3"MN. fl { - AS ACER SACC 4AFU"I SUGAR MAPLE 3"MIN. b - CF CORIUS FLORIDA FLOUERM DOGWOOD 3"MM. � O 0 - ma,. _ CP CRATAEGUS PHAENOPYIW WA 44INTON HAWTHORN 3"MIN. �� Ea . O O O O - JV JINIPER VIRGNIANA EASTERN RED CEDAR 3"MIN. O O O - PP PICEA PL GENS COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 3 MN. '� , DASHED LME INDICATE Q - TC TILIA CORDATA LITTLE LEAF LINDEN 3"MN. Q APPROVED LOCATION ' OF}PATH v O Q O 0 _ CD COTOtJEASTER OAMMERI BEARBERRY COTONEASTER 2-3 FT. v Q FORYIA TErEDIA FORSYTHIA e� r OOQ O. - FS . c.) a LANIDSCAPE SHALLOW - WO HYDRANGEA QUERGIFOLIA OAKLEAF HYDRANGEA 18-24 N. mOn - O - PM PINUS MUCO MUGO MUCsNO PINE 4-5 FT. F-1 A °t\° W A Y - RC RHODODENDRON CATAWBIENSE 'ALBUM' WHITE CATAWBA RHODODENDRON 2-3 FT. - RP PRINOPHIILUM ROSESHELL AZALEA 2 GAL V KI3 p O OO 0 v v - S}� SYRNGA PATULA 71155 MM' MISS KIMM LILAC 2-3 FT. � _ TX TAXUS CUSPIDATA JAPANESE YEW 15-18 IN. VISLII; t,M PR N FOLIU 1 BLACKHAW VIBURNUM 4-5 FT. SEASONAL PLANTING GROUND COVER (FLAT) I 12"O.C. RIP RAP STEEP SLOPE BETWEEN NOTES: PATH AND 1. PROVIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO ALL PLANTING AREAS CANAL WALL A.)DRIP SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO ALL TREE 4 PLANTING BEDS. B-)OSILATING SPRINKLER HEADS TO ALL GRASS AREAS. I CUT 4 REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF L V BURLAP ROOTBAILL >. g ��url 3" BARK MULCH PLANT SAUCER„ z � w • GREEN SPACE ' 4 CONTINUOUS 4" � ry^I,L �-- BUFFEr< 4 L.L. ^ —III-I I —I 1 1=1 1 - BURLAP ROOTEBALL 4'-0" HIGH METAL 1=1 11=1 I EL FENCE =1 I I-1 I I— I!I 1=1 11=1 I I _++1-=t —PLANTINGS SOIL MIS( BACKFILL XQ TIMBER VEHICLE =1 I=111=1 —1 1 I=1 11= IN LOOSE LIFTS OF:b - &" BARRIER ,� — _ I I 11=—1 I I-- 1-1 I I-I I DEPTH-SETTLE LIFT W/ =1 I 1=1 11= I =__- _=11 I: THOROUGH WATER SOAKING I-1 11-1 11—i 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I-1 11_I = MOUND OF SOIL AT CENTER P9- �P�' =1 I 1-1 I 1-1 11=1 I 1=1 I I-1 I El I MI MI MI I- of PIT TO SUPPORT BALL Q Q' 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-11 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1 1 1 1-1 1 1-1 i I—i At REQUIRED ELIEVATION 4151C' SHRUB DETAIL 1 �� l� SC4LE:3;"_11'-0" C2.0 - o p �40pq N. A LANDSCAPE — — O AREA 0 1 COVERED BLACK REINFORCCEO 00 -- - N PARKING SIGN RUBBER HOSE iABovE "Do Nor FIRST BRANCH C/ OGONG.SIDEWALK \ v 1 O !� o✓ ' / -- - - - ®/ -TWO STRANDS OIF IS 4� CSA. TWISTED STEEEL WIRE 0 roo 0 CO � , - GALVANIZED EYE 4 / TURNBUCKLE RIP RAP STEEP 2" X 2" CEDAR STAKES SLOPE BETWEEN .� / 3' / 3 STAKES PER TREE, J TIGHTEN AS SHOXLN z PATH AND V' / CANAL. WALL FIRST BRANCH J U 4 STORY STRUCTURE // 4" BARK MULCH j STEEL AND CONCRETE / _ " _ let STORY COM'4EF.CIAL / r 4 CONTINUOUS v 2nd TO 4th STORY RESIDENTIAL / 1 PLANT SAUCER I ' 45 DWELLING UNITS —I I PLANTING SOIL MIX BACKFILL / — — — IN LOOSE LIFTS OF b - S" o I I=1 I =111= DEPTH. SETTLE LIFT W/ co I I—I I THORouGH WATER SOAKINGLuQ _ C , SI p D c� RETAIL/BUSNESS RETAIL BUSNESS / I I I—III—I I—III—III—I — MOUND OF SOIL AT CENTER �o r`^ OF PIT TO SUPPORT BALL v) 40M SF 2000 SF -. =1 i I-1 i I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I-1 I I=1 10 0 (EACH RETAIL SPACE IIS N f AT REQUIRED ELEVATION Z Q) u m��IQ ISI ,1 LESS THAN 3000 SF) / co 8/ 3' 3' / r TREE DETAIL 2 z UP. 2 - — — —/— — — ,� — - - - L 5CALE:3i■_1"-0" C20 a E7 ' •/ / /" r ✓ F LD � ,. 4 _o ( ¢UP n � !/ BLACK REINFORCED O RUBBER HOSE O ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF NEW SIDEWALKS $I' MC3 SP,�ES UpWALK hil d m w;iritl�a JDLAI. RIGHTS OF USE ARE p �� I I'91' I 2 STRANDS IS GA.WIRE CONDITIONAL AND ARE GRANTED --- _-- I UNDER FULL COMPENSATION AND � SNI * * LIMITED TO A ONE—TIME USE TO, CONSTRUCT A SINGLE PROJECT � "RIGHT TURN ONLY" GALVANIZED EYE 4 ON THE SITE SO INDICATED. USE OF THE WORK AND ANY PROPERTY LME NEW SIDEWALKS TURNBUCKLE DERIVATIVE WORK COVERED UNDER THIS COPYRIGHT FOR OTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF G O O D H UE STREET 4" BARK MULCHI THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION OR PERMIT APPLICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR 4" CONTINUOUS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JDLAI. PLANT SAUCER FINISH GRADE CUT 4 REMOVE TROP 1/3 OF BURLAP ROO►TBALL BURLAP ROOTBALL 3 Rev PWtnvay7R4H4 _I=1 11= III=1 I 2" x 2" CEDAR SNAKES, 3 STAKES PER TFEE, 2 Gardrarlbcation711012014 _ — DRIVE AT 45• ANGLE 1 Panay►ayar 12 Sept tots PLANTING SOIL MIX —III—III—III III—III I I III—I I BACKFILL IN LOOSE LIFTS Mark Date =1 I I=1 I I III=1 I I=1 11= I I- I=1 I I of 6" TO 8" DEPTH. — SETTLE LIFT W/ THOROUGH Date 13 MAY 2013 12" VARIES 12" WATER SOAKING Scale 1"-20' MOUND OF SOIL AT CENTER OF PIT TO SUPPORT BALL Job Na' 2043 AT REQUIRED ELEVATION heet No. EVERGREEN DETAIL3 SCALE:3/4"=1'-0" c20 C2mO �' is _ ._I._!� � --- a..i..- �'•"'. --I - ----- � � - - - - __-_____.— _ . _ . . ,�I _ 1 CANAL LEGEND NORTH RAVER 0 N _ SICOWSE o \ P'( TRANSFOF 1ER w/ CONC. c' BOLLARDS ON CONC. PAD h '-S" 3_ '-4" 10'-0" 32'-5"PATHWAY LANDSCAPE " D _ E �� t 6 O TRASH DUMPSTER ONcot"- rCANAL WALL �' III POINT C1.0 - ` – Oj -� CONC. PAD TD.WALL Pberr PAIvcRrG DASHED LME MDICATE ' PROPOSED LIGHT POLE w OY PROPERTY LINE '^1 . •130' EL'°�' El •8.90' APPROVED LOCATION _- OF PATH / EDGE OF PAVEMENT 4 CURB,LANDSCAM SLOPE eE1ulEErl uveal uta_L AI SLOPE PE SHALLOW s �i CHAIN LINK FENCE o PATHWAY EliLALB 38 DE31IM£9 A Y 0 0 DECORATIVE METAL FENCE rn o - FATHINA`Y SECTION D2 015 3 3 3 SCALE: P=V-0" CIS x DETAIL OR SECTION IEEE SHEET CI.1 t GiZ) P HANDICAP PARKMG SPACE — — I C � � STRIPE ACCESS OR WALKWAY I RIP RAP STEEP C1.0 LJ A BUILDING ENTRANCE SLOPE BETWEEN PATH AND ' UTILITY POLE CANAL WALL � 4 'NA PATHWAY LANDSCAPE i HIGH POINT EL•9.90" TD.WALL LOW IPOIPIT PAWM6 EL■130' EL■!!E0' EL•890 �' 14 CIA O - - --- - 1 SLOPE BEMEEN CANAL WALL AND -- 17DPATHWAY EOLALS 8 DEGREES SECTION SCALE: 111=81-011 CL0 O GREEN SPACE B \ / 16 C1.0 O 4 �- 14 4'-0" HKs4 METAL -----� 4'-01" FENCE WALL PATHWAY LANDSCAPE MM4 PONTQ TIMBER VEHICLE TD.WALL EL- PARKlYs ( BARRIER EL•JE0' LOW POMT EL•915' �I J 7' EL•980' `( 2 NI- �� 16 14 n SLOPE eETUEEN CANAL WALL MID PATHWAY EaIALS 21 DECREES 4� 4-1 PATHAA%( SECTION c w SCALE: 1"=8'-0" Gl0 Q 6 �� 17F \ 1 p O�p T 14 LANDS�;E Q 4'-01" V� AREA C' PATHWAY LANDSCAPE UALL 17F COVERED 00 i W115-114.95POINrm' 6 fi'` PARKMG S - C� N w ' E 125 •D EL ' £L.•8.5js' LOW POINT EL•9 ' 77 4 G EL i •935' O - O_cS� GONG.SIDEWALK Qf - 4 A g� j / 4 3 `v SLOPE eETWEEN CANAL WALL Mm C1.0 a PATHWAY EliJALS 24 DEGREES 16 J` 16 21 O 20 -1 f f ATHNAY SECT1 ON B RIP RAP STEEP SCALE: 1"=8'-0" CL0 SLOPEV /j 3' / T14 AND CANAL WAIL tip 6 / _j W " 11 " U 44 STORY STRUCTURE 17F j W -8 1,31-411 10-0 2 STEEL AND CRETE t3 CANAL PATHWAY let STORY CAhQ'1ERCIAL / � I 14 utALl_ HIGH PONT M 2nd TO 4th STORY RESIDENTIAL EL-ILIO' TO.WALL PAR�c:MG 11 45 OWELLMG UNITS / 2 LU > I EL•9ID0' LOW POMC a-•��'- 1Uj a"'�' 20 � U�7/7'/ � O W ce) 1 SLOPE BETUEEN CANAL WALL AND C 17H _ 17F PATHWAY EQUALS 32 DEGREESL.1. L.L.. LIG TEDD 14 _ RETAIL/BUSINESS RETAIL EWMESS -// cc40M SF O 1 13 (EACH RETAI SPACE IS 2000 SF Z 0 I LESS THAN 3000 SF) � N W PATTIJ�AA"r SECTION A U.P. —� — — — — — — 3' 3' � 17F o SCALE In 81-0" C17Ar 13 (n n � �0 � m o ca m O 14 CL p �. 16 — 15 — 1 �/ 10 0 J1%A22 0 O ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF $P 5'-0" SIDEWALK 17A JDLAL TIGHTS OF USE ARE AND ARE GRANTED NEW SIDEWALKS MG SPACES UP. ---, �— UNDER FULL COMPENSATION AND S�N 17C LIMITED TO A ONE-TIME USE TO "RCT IGHT RN ONLY" ONNTHE US SITE SOCT A N INDICATGLE ED. USE PROPERTY LME NEW SIDEWALKS O OF THE WORK AND ANY DERIVAIVE WORK COVERED UNDER TTHIS COPYRIGHT FOR OTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF G O O D H UE STREET THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION OR PERMIT Q APPLICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR i.l.. WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JDLAI. 0 W Ica > O n- � � W 3 Rev Pathway 7124114 2 Gardrall loc Son 7/10/2014 1 Parking layout 12 Sept 2013 Mark Date �I Date 13 MAY 2013 Scale 1 r1 Job Na. 2043 Sheet No. C0 ■ I pop 171N I I i I I� KMTM S NN/ u AL 3 5 3 QTY. D BOTANICAL E COMM NAME SIZE COME NT RIVER CANAL FS FS - AR ACER RUBRIM RED MAPLE 3"MIN Q o (�OR TN 3 - AP ACER PALMATUM JAPANESE MAPLE 3"MNcz�p b 3 3 FS - AS ACER SACCHARUM SUGAR MAPLE 3"MIN C v �' - CF C )WW FLORIDA FLOU.ERNG DOGWOOD 3"MIN. h -o _ G• - CP CRATAEGUS PHAENOPYRLM WASHNTON HAWTHORN 3"MIN. E D 5 CD JV JUNIPER VIRCsINIANA EASTERN RED CEDAR 3"MN. t� L:, PP PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 3"MIN. DIASHED LINE INDICATE FS - TC TILIA CORDATA LITTLE LEAF LINDEN 3"MIN• i fa, h c APPROVED LOCATION ''� 4 3 AW OF PATH / - CD COTONEASTER DAM ERI BEARBERRY COTONEASTER 2-3 FT. 1 _ ' e y LAANDSCAPE SHALLOW 3 - HQ FS FORSYTHIA HYDRANGEA IA OAKLFORSYTHIA HYDRANGEA 19-24 N � vow �V1CM�`"3C SILOPE 6 I=M Ml1S4-5 Tx 1 MUCO MUCO MUGSWO NE FT. W A Y I - RC RHODODENDRON CATAWBIENSE 'ALBUM' WHITE CATAl11BARHODODENDRON 2-3 FT. Y_ I 1 - RP RHODODENDRON PRiNOPHYLLUM ROSESHELL AZALEA 2 GAL. O TG CF KM'- SP SYRINGA PATULA T11SS K ' MISS KIMh LILAC 2_3 FT. A 4 - TX TAXUS CUSPIDATA JAPANESE YEW 15.18 IN. TX _ _ FS - VP VIBURNUM PRUNIFOLIUM BLACK14AW VIBURNUM 4-5 FT. . MP MYRICA PENSYLVANICA BAYBERRY 3 GAL. RIP RAP STEEP _ AW SALIX PURPURIA DWARF BLUE LEAF ARCTIC WILLOW 3 GAL SLOPE BETWEEN C11.0 1 ~ i _ SE SEASONAL PLANTING GROUND COVER (FLAT) 12"O.C. PATH AND AS CANAL WALL NOTES: 4 1.PROVIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO ALL PLANTING AREAS 1 A.)DRIP SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO ALL TREE 4 PLANTING BEDS. B.)OSILATING SPRINKLER HEADS TO ALL GRASS AREAS. 1 SE2 CF 1 CUT 4 REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF A BURLAP ROOTBALL i S F8 d 3" BARK MULCH ' PLANT SAUCER, GF GREEN SPACE 0 CONTINUOUS 4" R s� B 3 C1.0 CF i CF BURLAP ROOTBALL 4'-0" HIGH METAL 2f— FENCE 1 c (�1111111 I I I I I ( =1 I I=11 1= PLANTING SOIL MIX BACKFILL �Q TIMBER VEHICLE )II=1I(- IN LOOSE LIFTS OF 6 - S" BARRIER 2 1 I =1 11=1 I I I I=III=� DEPTH.SETTLE LIFT W/ THOROUGH WATER.SOAKING T" 11=1 I I=1 11=1 I l=1 11_=1 11=1 11=1 I I—I I I_- MOUND OF SOIL AT CENTER QQ� �QX/ 4 111111�I I I I_I l l l l i,111,�11111�11111 1111=i 1111111 I I I=1111; A PIT TO ELEVATION SHRUB VET4-1 2 AIIL t j� �� \ 17C SCALE: /4"st'-t0" C2fd 3 -E-) 11�� AS U _ C3 C_ `� 1 N -! TG D CF \oma LANDSCAPE _— 0 TX AREA 5 0 1 COVERED BLACK REINFORCMD 00 PARKING � 3 2 FS SIGN - ` .• RUBBER HOSE AIBOVE � N TX "DO NOT ENTER" AS FIRST BRANCH CON .SIDEWALK O A / 4 / GATWISTED STSTRANDS EEEL WIRE 16 C1.0 1 5 CF Q GALVANIZED EYE: 4 TURNBUCKLE RIP RAP STEEPrr — — — —� — —® � — — 1 ' / 1 2" X 2" CEDAR SITAKES SLOPE BETWEEN V / 3, CF 3 STAKES PER T};REE, TIGHTEN AS SHOWN '7 PATrH AND L CANdAL WALL '�' I 1 CF JV FIRST BRANCH J O w 4 STORY STRUCTURE 4 BARK MULCH j STEEL AND CONCRETE 411 T' 1st STORY COMMERCIAL PLANT SAUCER 2nd TO 4th STORY RESIDENTIAL _ v 45 DWELLING UNITS I ( — ( 72 z TC PLANTING SOIL MIX BACKFILL v IN LOOSE LIFTS of 6 - 811 cc c DEPTH.SETTLE LIFT W1 �U- 0 rTX — — — THHOROUGH WATER SOAKING w Q 01 IX =MOUNv REtAIL/BUSINESS OF PITO TO SUPPORT BALL OF 6OIL AT � 0 (n D 4,041 REQ Or-BusINEss _ -1 I I-1 i I-1 I lil I I+I I I�I ! I—1 I 0 0 AT REQUIRED RE RE ELEVATION D ELE Z ` I I (EACH RETAIL SPACE IS c�a p Q LESS THAN 3,00LD SIF) 3 3 2 TREE DETAIL 2 N I , UP. 2 — -- --- — SE 1 iv `m o ¢UP. m m sE I SE LACK REINFORCED RCEt . 17LAw I 2012RUBBER HOSE ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND 3 TX IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF 8 P 3 '_0" I ALK 3 3 I I 2 STRANDS 18 GA. WIRE JDLA. RIGHTS OF USE ARE TX UNDER FULL COMPENSATION AND NEW SIDEWALKS 1 I P. TXCONDITIONAL AND ARE GRANTED CFE 3 3 ' SE 'J�" LIMITED CONSTRUCOT A S�INGL.EME USE PROJECTO CF SE 3 TX 4 "RIGHT TURN ONLY' GALVANIZED EYE 4 ON THE SITE SO INDICATED. USE TX SE TX TURN1��1CKLE OF THE WORK AND ANY PROPERTY LME SE NEW SIDEWALKS UNDER THIS WORK COVEED GHTR FOR } OTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF 4" BARK MULCH THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER G O O D H UE STREET CONSTRUCTION OR PERMIT APPLICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR 4" CONTINUOUS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JDLAI. PLANT SAUCER FINISH GRADE GUT 4 REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP ROOTBALL BURLAP ROOTBALL —III—I ` •' • _ -- 3 Rev Pathway 7124114 _ 2" X 2" CEDAR STAKES, DRIVE AT 45 TREE, 2 Gardrailloca6on711012014 ANGLE 1 Parking layout 12 Sept 2013 PLANTING SOIL MIX _I_I I I—I I UTI I I --III—III I I III—I I BACKFILL IN LOOSE LIFTS Mark Date —III—III III—III—III— I I— I—III-- OF 6" 70 8" DEPTH. — SETTLE LIFT W/ THOROUGH Dote 13 MAY 2013 12'" VARIES 12" WATER SOAKING Scale MOUND OF SOIL AT CENTER OF PIT TO SUPPORT BALL Job No. 2043 AT REQUIRED ELEVATION heet No. EVERGREEN DETAIL3 SCALE:34"=1'-0" C2 0 C2 . 0 ANAL � Crt1�h R ! o NORTH R��E C _ gi SIC-NAGE o TRANSFORMER w/ CONC. V o Q D - Coop._�-- � BOLLARDS ON CONC. PAD10 �+ 'e 10 CANALPATHWAY LANDSCAPE --- \'(• 16 TRASH DUMPSTER ON w WALL HKaH POI'NT C1.0 _.-- O7 ` [TR CONC. PADCo Z a~ I EL•sem LOW PDINr PAracltL, /' _--- � -+- PROPOSED LIGHT POLE •F■a h �' TA.WALL .�' EL■8.W DASHED LINE INDICATE � __--- �- E APPROVED LOCATION ■; OF PATH / ----PROPERTY LINE u LANDSCAPE SHALLOW g EDGE CSF PAVEMENT 4 CURB ELOPE EtiE1llEEN CANAL WALL AND ` PATHWAY EGIl1ALS 38 DEGREES SLOPE O 0 CHAIN LINK FENCE p 'wI SECTION � V � o I— ATHAA4( SECTION D2 � A 7 DECORATIVE METAL FENCE SCALE:I"=8'-0" c10 V X�--- DETAIL OR SECTION 1-43 P v (SEE SHEET CIJ 4 C12) — —CI— 6• HANDICAP PARKING SPACE C 2 STRIPE ACCESS OR WALKWAY RIP RAP STEEP C1.0 \ BUILDING ENTRANCE SLOPE BETWEENb S 9' ACE -0" 54' PATH AND + b ISITOfR SPACE 3 UTILITY POLE CANAL WALL 4 CANAL PATHWAY LANDSCAPE WALL HIGH POINtr EL s'W' TD.WALLLOW POINT PARKWx N ' EL•lam' EL■NO- EL■S.W' In 14 r O1 _ CA 0 17D • L WALL ADSLOPE ETWEEN c17DB PA?IW4EGJALS B DEG�ESPATHWAY SECTION a; LU SCALE: P=V-0" c1JD GREEN SPACE B R 6 C1.0 * O a _ 14 in '-8" 3'•4" 10'-0" 4'-0'° 4ENGE HIGH METAL 1= 10 LCIANM PATHWAY LANDSCAPE a EL-POINT Q TIMBER VEHICLE m (p EL•see' \ l a u ' 19' 11' T.D.WALL PARKMIG � BARRIER 22'Q EL■lEm' LOW POINT EL■9.115' n� d) EL■98m' C\!.r ? 71 wy 4 to ye 16 14 2 - 18' 19' ' SLOPE BETWEEN CANAL WALL AND ( P ■ tj'-5" _ _-- PATHWAY EaIALS 21 DEGREES VO V �/ `C/ S. °j Q� cn 1 4_j c - PT�fV� Y SECTION SCALE: 1"=s'-0" cIJD �� C1 a cn 6 cn `r D- CU \JXX ted` 0 17F X-8110'-411 10'-0" 4'_0.. 0� A ��' g�Q� T 14 LANDS&E _m 1 0 O REA PATHWAY LANDSCAPE � sr, V' 0 14*p POT 6 17F COVERED TD.WALL E. PARKIMIG �9, PARKING °D 00 SI CN o i EL 8J5' LOW POINT EL s2.5' �•�5, >> 44 G 'DO Nse ENTER" O CONC.SIDEWALK O 4 in A �� ' / / �4 ✓ ao SLOPE BEIu.eErl cANA.L WALL AND 0 PATW"Y EaIALS 24 DEGC1. REES O 21 O 16 S 20 -1 _ _V FATHY� Y EGTI0 N B RIP RAP STEEP 0 , SCALE:P=V-0" (clsD PAOnTH BETWEEN 3' F m CANAL WALL _j Q 4 STORY STRUCTURE W .21_8110'-4m 10'-0" 17F STEEL AND CONCRETE Z) W c WALL HCANAL PGH POINTY lat STORY COMMERCIAL a o 14 Z ■lam `� 2nd TO 4th STORY RESIDENTIAL 19 N W TA.WALL PARKINJG 45 DWELLING UNITS W O EL■9ID0' LOW POINT EL.10,06. 11 /T' p W Z EL■IU0' 20 ` 1 241 0. O O U j 0 � C40 SLOPE METUM UALL AND [/ 17H W =� PATMA4Y EGLIALS 332 EGREES sOPERTY GIN Gam. 17F 2 _ i?ET�I SS RETAIL BUSINESS 3 � LIGHTED 14 � 00 ....... t 13 (EACH RETAIL SPACE IS 2000 SF p O LESS THAN 3000 SF) 23'-3" 5'-8" � U FATHAAY SECTION rA 3' 3' N W SCALE.P -0"V-0" CCI UP. 17A I16 2 X = v 4u.P. n O t 14 ;v 0 m w ' ... QL O r. 16 � 1 15 1 ' 10 0 J1%A1 2012 0 ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF NEW SIDEWALKS $F 11 SPACES Up 5'-0" SIDEWALK 17A JDLAI. RIGHTS OF USE ARE CONDITIONAL AND ARE GRANTED UNDER FULL COMPENSATION AND SIGN 17C LIMITED TO A ONE-TIME USE TO °R� ONLY�� ! CONSTRUCT A SINGLE PROJECT PEDESTRIAN PATH W/ PROPERTY LINE NEW SIDEWALKS O ON THE SITE SO INDICATED. USE OF THE WORK AND ANY DERIVATIVE WORK COVERED I r1 UNDER THIS COPYRIGHT FOR 4'-011 FENCEOTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF G O O D H UE STREET THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER STONE RIP RAPT 115E CONSTRUCTION OR PERMIT (0 PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR "-12° 1 STONES AT 12° ��CC�' APPLICATION IS STRICTLY DEPTH / WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JDLAI. FILTER FABRIC BELOW RIP RAP CANAL WALL I k i 3 Rev Pathway 7/24/14 2 Gardrail location 711012014 1 Parking layout 12 Sept 2013 Mark Date Date 13 MAY 2013 Scale 1„=20' Job No. ' 2043 T"(FI CAL RIP RAO SECTION z Sheet No. I SCALE:NTS C1� Ci ■ ANAL LEGEND R N OTN _ --- "' SIGNAGE ~o o TRANSFORMER w/ CONIC. V M 32'-5° �- --''" G.� BOLLARDS ON CONC. PAD o CANAL PATHWAY LANDSCAPE UALL HIGH POINT C1D.0 --' ' --"" �\� a C. PADPStER ON � _ o� w ■. �' I rL DASHED LINE INDICATET 0.WALL _ .— PROPOSED LIGHT POLE o EP—_\ t1 ■980' EL• 8.90' APPROVED LOCATION / .-- - - PROPERTY LINE M rOF PATH EDGE OF PAVEMENT 4 CURB0 SLOPE BETUEEr� �wau AND LANDSCAPE SHALLOW PATHWAY EQUALS 38 DEGREES SLOPE CHAIN LINK FENCE o f' TY�lY SECTION D2 w DECORATIVE METAL FENCE _ Y � � ,� A >, O 4 3 SCALE:1"=8'-0" CI m V I X�— DETAIL OR SECTION 3 A 0 (SEE SHEET CIJ 4 C12) E3.— HANDICAP PARKING SPACE i STRIPE ACCESS OR WALKWAY RIP RAP STEEP C1.0 d BUILDING ENTRANCE SLOPE BETWEEN '� b S ACES V-0" 54' PATH AND s toVISITOR SPACE 5 UTILITY POLE CANAL WALL CANAL PATHWAY LANDSCAPE 10SP WALL HKaH POINT EL-390' N TD.WALL LOW POMT PARICMG N EL■130' EL.■980' EL■8.90' B r � � 0 SLOPE HETI EEN CANAL WALL AND PATHWAY EQUALS 8 DEGREES FATHAAY SECTION DI SCALE: V=V-0" Ci0 GREEN SPACE B EMEFER C1.0 r r - M f 4'-0" HIGH METAL '-8" 3'-4" 10'-0" L, 4'-0" FENCE _ o, WAN PATHWAY LANDSCAPE A♦ 1 T.O. PONT A TIM5 WALL E0 t L-998' aRKIrIG r�\� TIMBRE ER HICLE ,gym 0 V 1' 19 22'OL ll' EL■-Im, LOW POW EL.-315' n J e tu N � EL■380' ,( V �q NIca r SLOPE WnEEN CANAL WALL AND PATHWAY EQUALS 21 DEGREES V io 4_j- in FATHAAY SECTION s,�� °'� v) SCALE: 1 -8-m I.cl_o Q o �� y N N N a, LANDSCAPE O O AREA PATHWAY LANDSCAPE: � �� V' � WALL `ii�� ( COVERED �I 141644 POW IL ;0ONO T.O.OL UALL ARICMG PARKING — `-`` SIGN EL.*SD' LOW POW EL■`�S' - "DO NOT ENTER" EL WS O coNc.610EWALK �n 4 SLOPE BETILM CANAL WALL.AND C1O PATWILIAY EQLL4L8 24 DEG . REES �0 FATHWAY SEGTI ON B RIP RAP STEEP a SCALE: i"=8'-0" CI LZ� SLOPE TIETIIEEN .�� / 3' in PATH AND V' 41 CANAL WALL d) 0) 1L m J w _� W 4 STORY STRUCTURE ,n .21-81101-411 10'-0" 2 STEEL AND CONCRETE W a, CANAL PATHWAY m 16t STORY COMMERCIALWALL ® ? ¢ 1 1 HIGH POW '� 2nd t0 4th STORY RESIDENTIAL 19 h0 / EL-ILIO' 11 T.O.OL WALL PAWMG ® 45 DWELLING UNITS p ti Z EL Item, LOW POW EL-mIDy' U F1 .ILIO' 24' N U O Li A W SLOPE SEn EEN CANAL WALL AND PCO =� PATHW4Y EQUALS 32 DEGREES SIGN R r LIGHTED RETAIL/BUSINESS 0 4,000 SF RETAIL BUSINESS 3 ct O (EACH RETAIL SPACE IS 2000 SF 23'-3" Il' Z 0 LESS THAN 3,000 SF) coW FATHAAY SECTION A 2 „ 3' 3' N / SCALE- 1"=V-0" CL0 U.P. • a vJ 6 • m o 0 Q U "" + C. JDLAI 2012 0 ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND V IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF JDLAI. RIGHTS OF USE ARE NEW SIDEWALKS 8 P INCs 51m,4CES, U.P. V_w SIDEWALK U.P. CONDITIONAL AND ARE GRANTED SIGN UNDER LL COMPENSATION AND "STOP" LIMITED TO A ONE—TIME USE TO "RIGHT TURN ONLY" OJECT ONNTHEUCT A S SITE SON INDICGLE ATED.EED. USE PROPERTY LME NEW OF THE WORK AND ANY SIDEWALKS DERIVATIVE WORK COVERED UNDER THIS COPYRIGHT FOR OTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. ��1 "�"� "� '�"� �1 /� /� THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF I � O O 1 1 F--i U 1-i _ STREET 1 R E E 1 THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER `./ .lJ 1 11 1_IJI ►►►..�JJJ 1 � I I " I CONSTRUCTION OR PERMIT APPLICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JDLAI. 3 Rev Pathway 7/24114 2 Gardrail location 71102014 1 Parking layout 12 Sept 2013 Mark Date Date 13 MAY 2013 Scale 1"=20' Job No. 2043 Sheet No. ■ -_L _ PLANTING SCHWULE : o CANAL QTY ID BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENT o RIVER " - AR ACER R.15RUM RED MAPLE 3"MIN. _ o o NORTH F2-F-2-1. 4 FS w;, - AP ACER PALMATUM JAPANESE MAPLE: 3"MIN o e s AS ACER SACCHARUM SUGAR MAPLE 3"MIN 2 <, V 2 TX HG2 - �,'l� - OF COp S FLORIDA FLOWERING DOGWOOD 3"MM. �� G - CP CR47AEGUS PHAENOPYRIJM WASHINTON HAWTHORN 3"MIN �y '�4 � w :i= I - JV JUNIPER VIRGINIANA EASTERN RED CEDAR 3"MIN. °; o r,- I FS J `- g - PP PICEA PUPKsENS COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 3"MIN '~ y ' - TC 71LIA CORDATA LITTLE LEAF LINDIEN 3"MIN. '� � �� 0 DASHED LINE INDICATE �' '' 4 FS APPROVED LOCATION `"`.�• ...- -'' � .� OF PATH HQ CD COTONEASTER DAMMERI BEARBERRY C07iONEASTER 2-3 FT. M 5 I - FS FORSYTHIA INTERMEDIA FORSYTHIA 2 GAL. LANDSCAPE SHALLOW - HQ HYDRAWSEA QUERCIFOLIA OAKLEAF HYDRM4GEA 18-24 M. o SLOPE Tx - F'M INUS MUCO MUCO MUGHO PINE 4-5 FT. ti o A Y 1 1 -I RC RHODODENDRON CATAWBIENSE 'ALBUM' WHITE CATAWBA FRHODODENDRON 2-3 FT. dS i 4 3 Y_ S I I - RP RHODODENDRON PRINOPHYLLUM ROSESHELL AZALIEA 2 GAL. TC CF - SP SYRINGA PATULA 'MISS KM' MISS KIMM LILAC 2-3 FT. 4 _ TX TAX IS CUSPIDATA JAPANESE YEW 15-18 IN. TX FS - VP VIBURNUM MNIFOLIUM BLACKHAW VIBUR NLN 4-5 FT. - SE SEASONAL PLANTING GROUND COVER (FLAT) 12" O.G. RIP RAP STEEP I SLOPE BETWEEN AS I NOTES: PATH AND 1. PROVIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO ALL PLANTING AREAS, CANAL WALL AJ DRIP SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO ALL TREE 4 PLANTING BEDS. 4 BJ OSILATING SPRINKLER HEADS TO ALL GRASS ARIEAS. 7 I SE CF 2 CF 1 CUT 4 REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP ROOTBALL 4 d 3" BARK MULCH S FS PLANT SAUCER, CF GREEN SPACE d CONTINUOUS 4" R d 3 1 CF I CF - i i / I - BURLAP ROOTBALL 4'-0" HIGH METAL 2 FENCE a o =III=III= —III=III= ( (I—I I I—III _ I PLANTING SOIL MIX BACKFILL TIMBER VEHICLE IN LOOSE LIFTS OF b - 8" 2 C` BARRIER _ DEPTH.SETTLE LIFT W/ �Gj I I 1 I—I I—III ( (—I I THOROUGH WATER SOAKING Tx ,q =III=III=I I —i- 1-1 _u I _—III MOUND OF SOIL At CENTER I L I I I—I I I—I I—III—I I—I I-1 I I—i I I—I 4 i111111IIIII�IIIII�IIII,,,III1,111I11111II�III�I1�1111=1iIII1 ATPREQTOREDPORT ELEVATION Q GP CF 4 2 SHRU5 DETAIL Y4 SCALE:3/4"=V-0" C20 +, I TX 0 1 N E Q 0� AS CF �� O � �Q LANDSCAPE w w / 0 TX AREA g `+`� I COVERED FS BLACK REINFORCED 00 A PARKING RUBBER HOSE ABOVE N -SIGN 1 FIRST BRANCH TX "DO NOT ENTER" O 5 GON .SIDEWALK AS 4 TWO STR4NDS OF 18 1 g 0 / GA. TWISTED STEEL WIRE CF O 0 O rx GALVANIZED EYE 4 TURNBUCKLE - - - - -or - -® —7— RIP RAP STEEP 1 2" X 2" CEDAR STAKES SLOPE BETWEEN �� / CF 3 STAKES PER TREE, PATH AND V' 3 TIGHTEN AS SHOWN z CANAL WALL 1 5 Jv 3 FIRST BRANCH J Q m 1 4 U �� BARK MULCH �4 STORY STRUCTURE j I 2 STEEL AND CONCRETE 4" CONTINUOUS TC a) 18t STORY COMMERCIAL PLANT SAUCER 2nd TO 4th STORY RESIDENTIAL 0 V 45 DWELLING UNITS I I I—I I `� , '.'i' - . I I—� I — Z W Z PLANTING SOIL MIX BACKFILL O TC ;::�: I- — w CC Cl) IN LOOSE LIFTS OF 6 - 8" v 3 II-II _-III- _ TX - DEPTH. SETTLE LIFT W/ � W 2 THOROUGH WATER SOAKING _ D I I I—) I I- MOUND OF SOIL AT CENTER cc 0 �^ REtAIL/BUSINESS O v, 400 SF usINEss - —1 I I-1 I I—I I I�I I I�I I I-1 I I-1 1I OF PIT TO SUPPORT BALL o 0 h I (EACH RETAIL SPACE IS2000 SF AT REQUIRED ELEVATION Z c Q I LESS THAN 3,000.SF) cv I �I 3' 31 2 TREE DETAIL 2 L z SE U.P. � 2 — — — — — — — _.._. sSIMSCALE:3/4 � °=1' 6 Lj IA 1 o 0 U.P. 2 JV 4 0 O \ R :. �. SE ,► — BLACK REINFORCED J1%A1 2012 Q SE SE RUBBER HOSE ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND 3 IDEAS ARE THE PROPERTY OF SEJDLAL RIGHTS OF USE ARE TX 8 3 " 3 3 I 2 STRANDS 18 GA. WIRE CONDITIONAL AND ARE GRANTED NEW SIDEWALKS PK TX P- '-0K TX U.P. UNDER FULL COMPENSATION AND CF I YP 3 I SIGN LIMITED TO A ONE—TIME USE TO 'STOP" CONSTRUCT A SINGLE PROJECT CF SE 3 TX 4 CF SE "RIGHT TURN ONLY" GALVANIZED EYE 4 ON THE SITE SO INDICATED. USE PROPERTY LINE TX OF THE WORK AND ANY SE TX SE SIDEWALKS ^4y� TURNBUCKLE DERIVATIVE WORK COVERED UNDER THIS COPYRIGHT FOR OTHER PROJECTS IS PROHIBITED. ^ O O �� STREET S THE USE OR REPRODUCTION OF U\Y THESE PLANS FOR ANY OTHER 4" BARK 1„IULGH CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR 4" CONTINUOUS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JDLAI. PLANT SAUCER FINISH GRADE CUT 4 REMOVE TOP 1/3 i— OF BURLAP ROOTBALL - — BURLAP ROOTBALL 2" X 2" CEDAR STAKES, 3 Rev Pathway 712a11a 3 STAKES PER TREE, 2 Gardrail location 7/1011014 DRIVE AT 45' ANGLE 1 Parking layout 12 Sept 2013 PLANTING SOIL MIX I-I ( (—) I I—III III—III I I I ( I—I I Mork Date BACKFILL IN LOOSE LIFTS -I I E I I 111-1 I I-1 I I- I I- ISI I I- SE TO 8" DEPTH. -- SETTLE LIFT W/ THOROUGH Date 13 MAY 2013 12" VARIES 12" WATER SOAKING Scale 1"-20' MOUND OF SOIL AT CENTER OF PIT TO SUPPORT BALL ° °• 2043 AT REQUIRED ELEVATION Sheet No. EYERCGREEN DETAIL 3 SCALE:3/4°=I'-0" C20 C2mO uiiver 'aL www.myuniversalop.com phones I-NO.75646M UNV1 ILI511S wioe 40 Zo°1 Aon NOW CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS . a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND soo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP DIRECPOR September 11, 2014 North River Canal, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue interface with Goodhue Street roadway improvements Dear Attorney Correnti, Pursuant to the meeting on June 11, 2014 between representatives from the developer, Fay, Spofford and Thorndike (FST), and The City of Salem, and subsequent communications, each party shall be responsible for the following tasks and improvements: Fay, Spofford and Thorndike (FST) • Adjust the horizontal and vertical alignments for Goodhue Street/Grove Street/Beaver Street intersection and roadway approaches to meet new curb limits along the parking area in front of the 28 Goodhue site for an approximate distance of 450 feet. Update design plans and estimate North River Canal, LLC • Demolition and construction work needed to implement the plans provided by FST for the removal and reconstruction of the Goodhue Street granite curb and concrete sidewalk immediately south of the 28 Goodhue site, for an approximate distance of 100 feet. • Installation of an expansion joint at the interface of the sidewalk and the "bump out" in line with the main entry to the 28 Goodhue Street building, to accommodate the City's future re-grading of the "bump out" such that it tips down to meet the grade of Goodhue Street. City of Salem Work to be completed in concert with the re-alignment and reconstruction of Goodhue Street: • Re-grading of the "bump out" in line with the main entry to the 28 Goodhue Street building, such that it meets the grade of Goodhue Street, and provides a handicap accessible connection to the crosswalk across Goodhue Street. • Installation of handicap ramps and crosswalks across Goodhue Street at two locations: one in line with the main entryway into the 28 Goodhue Street building, and one proximate to the termination of the public multiuse path on the north side of the 28 Goodhue Street property. Please refer to the attached plans. Sincerely, Dana S. Menon Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development Attachments Cc: Jill McLaughlin and Rick Azzalina, Fay, Spofford, and Thomdike -2- '� _e�q fl MrYOryiory� / r•` �P fa CURB AND SIDEWALK REALIGNMENTS DRAWN IN f$ „al:.,,.,.n �•� /� / Pv RED SHALL BE P / •^\s // / / / / _ / CONSTRUCTED BY NORTH U / RIVER CANAL,LLC WITHIN y ` I • ""` a `>4 Rp"Q I/ o 8� / Q�N /^m,a,w..a THE CIRCLED AREA. V,- � " �� y, / QRO r i � � o z z o i SUMMARY OF MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO d BE COMPLETED BY NORTH RIVER CANAL,LLC AND CITY OF a SALEM,PER LETTER DATED 9/11/2014 ¢p¢ m 0 4 rL - S ep M it PR `� EXPANSION JOINTTO9q & x s` BE INSTALLED BY ACCESSIBLE R P& NORTH RIVER CANAL,LLC 1 ' g s CURB AND SIDEWALK REMOVALANDcl ul CROSSWALK pss„ 6 RECONSTRUCTION,BY OO® INSTALLATION L}6,L NORTH RIVER CANAL,LLC a e BYCITY OFSALEM mv�6 E "BUMPOUT"REGRADING, °. °""61NL°''e°0"� NO CROSSWALK ATSSIB NO CROSSWALK AT sI THIS LOCATION \ ACCECROSSRALK -- - - - - - - i-'— — THIS LOCATION \V. AND CROSSWALK GOODHUE STI\�,yET INSTALLATION 1 BY CITY OF SALEM 'moo CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Decision Site flan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit North River Canal, LLC' ?S Goodhue Street February 20, 2007 North River Canal,LLC C/o Joseph Correnti ,63 Federal Street Salem,a`w1A 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street _Y Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special--Permit On Thursday, Decem her 7, 2006; the Planning Board of the City 0f Salem opened a Public (-Tearing regarding the applicationof North River Canal, LLC, 282 Bennington Street..Bostun, MA under Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit for the property located at 28,Goodhue Street.The proposed project includes the construction.of a nese four-story mixed-rise structure with 6,000 sq. ft. of commercial/retail space on the first floor„ and 44 restdential'condominiums on the: Lipper floors.. The public hearing was continued to December'21,-2006, January 4. 2007, January 18, 2007,February 1, 2007 and February 15, 2007. The-Public Hearing was closed on February 15, 2007. At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on February 15, 2007, the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor (Power, Collins, Puleo, Moustakis, Hansom, Ready), none (9) opposed, to approve the application as complying with the requirements of Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permits, subject to the following conditions: I. Conformance with the Plan 'work shrill conform with the pliins entitled, ,'North River Condoniijiluri.'S Goodhue Street, Salem, MA" prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates. Inc 104 Lowell Sheet, Peabody, MA dated November 15, 2006, and revised January 1'); 2006, including pages C-1 — CA G1,0-C 1:2, Cs, A1, A4-A4.Iand A55 2. Amendments Ane amendnients to the site plan ~hall be revie%kcd by the Cate Planner and ifdeemed ncccss.uv by the City Planner, shall lie brou«lrt.io the Planning Board, riny-waiver.t f conditii7ns eantaine t within shall require the approval,of the Pkirining Board.. 3. Project Delays 120 WASH,NGTON S RE U, S .LEM, tA5sacriUSE7,; 01WO o ti: .: (178.745,9:795 F.;:t:97°.7 0.040.4 The developer,his successors or assigns shall notify the Departmentof Planning Lind Community Development if work on the site ceases for any reason for a,period of six (6)months. In thisevent, the applicant shall be required to appear before the Planning Board and report to the Board the reason(s) why work has ceased at the project and a schedule of when work will begin again at the site, as well as a date of final project completion, If substantial work has not commenced on the - site, as deemed by theBoard, and such work is not anticipated to begin within two (2) years of the date of the Planning Board's original decision, the applicant shall notify the Board and, prior tothe two-year anniversary of the issuance of the permit, shall request an extension of the permit from the Board, Applicant shall provide in such requestany and all materials the Board may require to make a determination on the extension request, including but not limited to:studies, reports or new plans, at the applicant's expense; as requested by the Board and deemed necessary by the City Planner. 4. Signage All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the pity Planner prior to the issuance of a sign permit. 5. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcelsor adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner and the City Electrician for review and approval prior to the'issuance of a building permit, c. After installation, lighting shall be.reviewed by the City Planner,prior to the e issuance ofa. Certificate of Occupancy_ 6. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the followingconditions: a. The operation of tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work shall.occurin accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5): Construction and Blastin-_ and between the hours, of 8:O0 AM and 5:00 PN4 on weekdays and Saturdays. No. work shall take place on Sundays or holidays. The Planning Board will agree to changes in the starting time, at tile request of the applicant and,if approved by a formal vote of the City Council,as per the ordinance, b.. Any blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering,hydraulic bursting, or pile driving shall occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 CSi: Construction and Blasting and be limited to Monday-Frnclay'between, the hours.of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PVI. There shall be no blasting. rock crushing,lack hammciina, hydraulic blasting, or pile driving on Saturdatys, Sundays, or holidays. c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with ,dl local and state tcatilatwns,. d ,all reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative cifccis cif construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in rvritingr at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the pro' t. e. All construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned,orior to leaving,the site so that. they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the site. f. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rules, regulations,and ordinances of the City of Salem. g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight at the site must be located completely on the site. h, No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the,Dep4rimen't of Planning and Community- Development, ommunityDevelopment, unless deemed an emergency by the Salem'Police Police Department, 7. Landscaping a. Any proposed landscaping.shall be done in accordance with Theapprovedset of plans. b. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Salem Cemetery & Shade Tree Department for the selection of street trees. The selection,and placement of street trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Planning &Community Development prior to installation., c. The final landscaping plan shall be approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. Construction' raffic a. All construction will occur onsite: no construction will occur or be staged within City right of way. Any deviation from this.shall be approved by the Department, of Planning &Community Development prior to construction. b. A constructionfraffic management plan and schedule shall be submitted to,the Department of Planning & Community Development for review and approval,prior to the issuance ofa, building permit. c. Any roadways, driveways, or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be,restored to their original condition by the applicant. d. The applicant shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the.construction site, and clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as necessary. 9. :Affordable Housing Units .0 The Applicant shall place an Affordable,Housing Restriction on four (4) hOUsnirg units in the Por m of'a deed rider approved by the City Planner and registered,with tire Essex,South Registry of Deeds. The affordable housing restrictions are to be in accordance with the eligibility ci"Ilerla for the Commonwealth Department of Housing and Community De.clopment's Subsidized fjousine lnventory for the Purpose Of ensuring that the four(4) dwelling units will be restricted its affordable housing for households whose annual incomes are cighty percent (80%) or less of Area Median Income ("Low Income Households");with a sales price affordable to Low Income households for a period an ninety (90) years from the date of the original conveyance. b) The developer shall prepare a buyer-selection Plan,for approval by the City Planner, to ensure compliance with affordable housing requirements, The developer Isto be responsible for any marketing costs and income verifi,eation. 10, Design ReviewBoard a. The applicant shall submit final construction plans for review and approval by the,Design Review Board (DRB) prior to obtaining a building Permit. b. In the final construction plans, the landscaping at the entrance to the building shall be placed four (4) feet,from the entrance, as opposed to the ten (10) feet shown on the plan. c. The applicant shall work with and submit to.the City PI'anner plans for a fence.to be a four(4) feet tall, withstand ayveight load of at least 1,200 lbs. and shall provide a safe barrier between the canal and the walkway for toddlers and,small children. d. Final material samples shall be reviewed and approved by the-DRB prior to obtaining a. building permit. e. The treatment of the storefronts should,be some form of masonry from the bottom of the storefront.windows to the 2FOLind, The details of the masonry treatment will be reviewed for conformance with the intent of the Board's recommendation when the construction drawings are submitted. f. The signage for the buildirrz and the site must be approved priorto obtaining a sign permit. 11. Traffic Mitigation The applicant agrees to donate,$20,000'to the city of Salem for traffic improvements and/or a study of the area in and around Goodhue, Boston and Bridge Streets for traffic mitigation, priorto, the issuance of a building permit. 12. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided.by the City,at the applicant, his successors or assigns' expense, as is deemed necessary by the,City Planner,.. 13. Salem Health Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Health Department, if applicable. 14. Office of the City Engineer The applicant, his successors or assigns shall compiv'%v;th all requirements of the City Engineer' 15, Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the office of the Salem Buildim4 Commissioner, 16. Office of the Building Commissioner All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 17. Easement for Walkway 4 The applicant shall prepare and file a!I necessary form,,, and plans to secure a recreational easement for the use of the walkway by residents of the city of Salem,that shall run with the land, in perpetuity. 18. Utilities Any utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the, issuance of a Building Permit. All utilities shall be installed underground. 19. Nfaintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site, c. Maintenance of any landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two- year period., d. Maintenance of the walkway, fence and all other items and landscaping within the walkway casement and accessory to tile walkway shall be the responsibility of the property.owner. The property owner shall maintain this area in good condition and, in the event that any portion of the area falls into disrepair, as deemed by the City Planner, the property owner shall, upon written request of the City Planner, immediatety repair, replace or restore the necessary portions of the walkway to ensure both the safety of the use of the walkway for residents, and the aesthetic value of the area. 20. iks-built Plans & Street Acceptance Plans :\s-built plans and Street Acceptance Plans, stamped by a Itegistered Professioiial h.,-igincer, shall be subirutied to the Department of Planning and Community Development and I]icpartment of public Services prior to the issuance of the Final Certificate of Qccupalicy for the ;ubdivisiori and/or the acceptance of any streets. T'he .\s-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file forniat suitable for the C; ity's use and approvccl be tile City Engineer, prior to the issuiricc of the final Certificitre,or OCCUP1110Y for the subdiN kion and/or the acceplance (-)f:tn,v Streets. -ailable :it the Engineering arlda ccurificarloil complered tic card, a blank col)v '.ix n s gricd arid srarllped bv the design cfigincef,,stating that i,tic work �viis completcd,iubsuintial compliance with rhe design draft=ing�, must he subnutred to the Cily Engineer prior to the issuailcc of the filial Certificate of Occuparicy foe the Subdivision and/Or the acceptance ofanly srrCet's-I as w'ellas' ally SUI)SCLIUCIlt requirements be the Circ E.ngiricer. 21, Violations Violations ofanycondition ;hall result in revocation of this permit by the,Planninix, Board, unless the violation oi'such condition is waived by a majority vote ofthe Planning Board. 5 t hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has;been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board, The Decision shall not take effect unit I a copy of this decision.bearing the certification of the City Clerk thattwenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or, that if such appeal has been filed, and 'it has b&rt dismissed or denied, is recorded in the,Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is:recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or aPPlicant, his Successors or assigns,shall pay,the fee for recording or registering. Walter B Power, iII Chairman 6 b4 w.lt '�1l,J Co.../r aMJt. ��yy 7 )o.k'`" i• �$/G-o�"WC S�• � o sr PQ �euiiiv€ - r►i �.d �,,,,yvr N,ed �yp•-,�`.Q, / / _ � 1 a.n IV)n 5 0 55 Lua wN 3DW* . FF = . Gt n��i vw p 6 eKQa J ice, z ,Suil+nv+s- 'moo .. • ••� __ _._ �j-� 95s��fL�$ w TT 199, 3 PROPOSED BUILDING EI b - a�� ex fd oxi�•+-� i�^�"\ h° € '� a E V �pf® �ursxco nR cL,. i DI � !! ✓ �J r! � E v _tKK �M(•PJr SC !✓UM •!? b E a F vs b f1 000 X�r,,,�yc— CIO 5 u Vow rtly €pS � 9 s R M no GOODHUE P -v • c�rsY�;SwaL� � I , CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS a = DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ? �A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP DIRECTOR July 31, 2014 North River Canal, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue interface with Goodhue Street roadway provements Dear Attorney Correnti, Pursuant to the meeting on June 11, 2014`be#ween representatives1rom the developer, Fay, Spofford and Thorndike (FST), and The City of Salem, and subsequent commune ations, each party shall be responsible for the following tasks and improvements: Fay. Spofford and Thorndike (FST) • Adjust the horizontal and vertical alignments for Goodhue Street/Grove Street/Beaver Street intersection and roadway approaches to meeteew curb 1 mits along the parking area in front of the 28 Goodhuesitefor an approximate distance of 450 feet. update design plans and estimate North River Canal,L'LC,\ ) ) � • Demolition and construction work,needed to implement the plans provided by FST for the removal and reconstruction of thefGoodhue St et-gram curb and concrete sidewalk immediately south of the 28_Goodliue site,f r an approximate-dist6uce of 100 feet. • astallati no o expansion joint at the interface of the sidewalk and the "bump out" in line with the main entry to the28 Goodhue-Strdet building, to accommodate the City's future re-grading of the "bump out" sue that it tips down to meet the grade of Goodhue Street. City of Salem �•' Work to be completed in c neert with the re-alignment and reconstruction of Goodhue Street: • Re-gradingofthe "bump out" in line with the main entry to the 28 Goodhue Street building, such that it meets the grade of Goodhue Street, and provides a handicap accessible connection to the crosswalk across Goodhue Street. A • Installation of handicap ramps and crosswalks across Goodhue Street at two locations: one in line with the main entryway into the 28 Goodhue Street building, and one proximate to the termination of the public multiuse path on the north side of the 28 Goodhue Street property. Please refer to the attached plans. Sincerely, Dana S. Menon Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community DevelopmK— Cc: Attachments Jill McLaughlin and Rick Azzalina, Fay, Spofford, and horndike s c"" ECsEND 'i m N�RTM RI`/EF — � enxlra C qh^gg s•s r• r m clo _ _ � _ y,.� ® moan oufeieaw n`t F _ 1 GRIG P°D T PRJreeEv Lair ate e• Q ILL.MN // _ F%FERM1 LrE �. m. PAT WAY SECTION X01 + OeGOX°"n °0N E ec.le:r.d.o cim �j �e�ra d, zzazzmmwee rzee•op unluu.r ia•wmGr cvo LI \ A aunts GlrN•aL e TMs emmr .°• •e • ve x• q :mlm Pmn Y'X m. GJILL YWI °•• P.TYVR L.WKN6 •^ Q rro it , a "~ PATHWAY SECTION �1 ecce:r.v'm um m®I Mo p Panour uwm+rB � QP�� PSP 'd G m G M.s• PA WAY SECTION ecce:r.e'�• � yob e` � )I a r.mwr LYpeGIB � o a � a ,u�o1. a �► O �l N moor enGe c «.�•�wr LQ A 1 t rmrBuul.m� a.o _ _ a w• PATHWAY ga ION RPFPmEP v o m.ae eenea � ♦— ranao caul wuu s 'd y I w °marremcma Q � •s r.v ma mm slm rnatare ^.,.�,I.r a rmalrcareava G w cc as amr�..0 , � / ar.°,Bn.m• wrm maPss .' 9� LLI p r \ L�KiY®Px8 n ]a°.fR r>.-Y 6 R •.y. ^e PATHWAY SECTION �.1 OTj� i J041 ]OI] Ib el!luWXe °p sm ur. v.e•emewx uP. %Mr nm oar• maiFR1T LIB ��+°° .MpMr. al Sa GOODHUE STREET �A 1.ze 2Ne C1 .0 flA N07M F�.M IV CA L 6 m 554',1 T. zomwc asTRicT. NOFTHwvEF cA �'' 0hQAf iO SMICT.0(7R7H RIVER CZAN L COORRRIDOR SgA '�f / _ / GENERAL NOTES - - 1 2. ASSESSOFS MAAPP 16 LOT J 2 k PART MAP 15 LOT.700 \ l - ! A DEED DIMS REFERENCE. BOOK 22202 PAGE JN v `•„a 1) THIS PLAN 1S THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD _ 4 EASEMENTS, AGREEMENT$ N SPL . ABOVE a t SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PRIVA IE PLANS ' DlEO ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 8 .. Q 7H£ENTIRE LOCUS IS SHORN W1TWN FLOOD ZONE A ,b 2) UTIUTIE5 SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND FEMA TUM T MAP OW A PANEL 1, AUG 5, Af 6 Ia RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE t7F 6. PLAN DATUM TAKEN FAR ABOVE fL000 MAP, RMB �� UNLIERGROUND CONDITIONS -- 7. LOCUS LOT AREA f2_PARATE. 7903ff SF. / . 6 STREET UNE(S A OXIMAIE. / ,,. „ • . .. „ 3) THE CON7RAC7OR SHALL BE RESPONSBIF FOR VERIFYING AND . DEIEWINING THE-LOCA 1709 SIZE AND ELEVATION..OF ALL .. _.. .. / / • + EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SYOWN ON THESE PLANS +/ PRIOR 70 ANY CONSTRUCTIONN, THE ENGYNEDP SHALL BE N07TRED +/ IN NRI77NG OF ANY U77U77ES FOUND wERFrowc WITH THE 1 +� PROPOSED CONSTRUC71ON AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION I +/ BEFORE PROCEED/NO WITH THE WORIO 1 +`°$�D •.• +/�F'� 4) THIS PLAN /S BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS DEEDS AND 7NE RESUL7S OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF ANIS DAZE. NO CER711-7C477ON IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY TITLE OR AS TO THE L70S7SVCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS to 5) THE OWNER SHALL CONFIRM OOMPUANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE - {{ CODES ETHODS OF INS ALLA TION of GOVERNING IAL ANY LMPROVEAlEN DEPICTED +�+ DN THIS PLAN. / 'A ORAWING INDEX SHEET C-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN MEET C-2 SITE LAYOUT PLAN Py \ � SHEET C-3 97E GRADING k UTILITY PLAN SHEET C-4 S77E DETAILS R "Aw / izLN Q „ • •., I „, WAN SALTY p / `UM17ED PAR77V£RSHIP ` 4� / \ •'• SURFAC IS CRUSHED CONCRETE RUBBLE 1 L E G E N D �O 6UW'Ae G ` o TNH EXISTING TEIEPNDII6 CLE: £ •�V o SMR EXISTING MAIN NANH LE fpN 10 • r• 1 i DMH DDrn1.NG CATCH MANHOLE n` . •L• ENSIWG HYDRANT Wlltt PDIE CAIS t \ \ +.. 1Y oS+w SALEM WATER WORKS CURB PENCE LAWN W SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN NOTE .A1suvot 6 FOOT TEMPORARY st0 66ft1 . CHAIN LINK FENCE RUNS ,��, �, -_/—� NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM ar " .10 �• . .,.:: ALONG PERIMETER OF SITE �� aw :a xOa,r6W a SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS p� �104J Na17620$70.16' W++ 'a,' EXISTING CONDITIONS a N0077R � fYe a 1 M1.w .N oa N aware acne ` I a �_,OM1 ••A,••. Alwith mw 282 Senn Condommim. LLC Eoafem Land SLnwy Assoc. Inc - "'+• B19fa'1 Cmletaphen R. AWfo ALS Emit Batton W 02728 104 Lowell Sf, Peabody IWA 0/860 \\ 9n., a.a —w".a n.• awn oa m..a T la7B)531-8f21 s� w .(�� PA4pgWt e_ STREE!' .a ALE GaODH 0 10 20 AO 6D BENCHMARK DATE ' . HMRANT SPINDLE JANUARY 13. 2006 pn(e R. KN10 ELEYANON T6.z+ ]id17. F 7387£ - REVISIONS sw N0. e Re rPx2� C—I RIVfR CANAL NOTES NORM s13',T41-C 47.33 ---�-- t. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED 51s.eyoo•E s7.7o' - SITE LIGHTING _... 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS j p4,p 3. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF A VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ON IFNm M.Ea OCTOBER 17, 2006. -- gIW51F° PAD .. 4. PROPOSED LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF INDICATED ... IMPROVEMENT. .. .... _. 5. ALL DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 0is o ;i� a 6. PARKING SPACE STRIPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH WHITE o REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT. ,p� e e 100 FT. eNDARY 60U es i $ s rw m0aP�w oma b Y-6 al@.'p wo° w 'I > 1nW1R1 P1 BJNiCS 0 vuirurarvwtaw a ° r >C P(5f MW LA To ^ _" is' 19 Y r tr Iu' or 1. e '1 GPa� 4 6 2z4 Ae cS a. waw N R I. 2p0 Ff. RtVERFRONi. RIF. � 'P � BOUNDARY . I s w 4IMsmicn� NOTE: •e fl � '° a �' HORIZONTAL DESIGN TAKEN FROM PLANS BY n u6reuxo a°w - �s JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. a X35 MGG S j N1t66 9' o �a w /. 2r_r a 17, m SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN s "0g'z'+aE 96.00. 1, _ nett NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM Ao"S��cr lrw . ,, "'E „ ;`°,""°"' —""v' , , t SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Ry,,PS 4 r OR t'FS OP GN IUC M RB 4ftm ti ii Y �. ftyeSB' �sw SITE LAYOUT PLAN 10.15' NOS Tl0" a PM"w 9"2s NEW sIUEWN�( Prepared Far Pro'aarad By. 20.4V March Rhw Condmothfa n, LCC Eastern Lmrd&hrrcy Assoo., Inc. Ntt'39'10"W 282 Bennlngtan St Christopher R. Melo P.LS v foat Boston YA 02126 101 Lowell SL Pmbody MA 01960 (978)531—@121 . •�� SCA!£ . STREET 'P 20 GOODHUE a e p o to zo w 6o s� p\\D DA TIF , �• F 13879 JANUARY 1; 2006 cn II ueno P! fJV 6HFFf N0. _ REVISIONS 1. MARCH 22, 2006 r e) {+ 1. DEAIOUTIM SHALL BE CONDUCT® IN ACCORDANCE MATH ALL - I•bbD 1) 711E CONTRACTOR SHAM BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFTNO 1 APPucAeLe LAWS AND REOLILATONS. DENDLmON Mw7ERIAL ` / AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION. SIN: AND ELEVA71ON 11JI SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A ut�NSED FAGUTY, WETTING \ r OF ALL EXISTING UTIU71E% SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON .SHALL BE USED FOR DUST CONTROL DURING THE DEMOLITION PHASE. \ �I` THESE PLANS. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE 2. EXISTING PAVEMENT ON SITE SMALL BE CRUSHED AND RECYCLED i \ ENGINEER SHALL BE N071FlED N WRITING OF ANY AS BASE COURSE FOR NEWLY PAVED AREAS \ --e UTIUMES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED • f S. NEW SIDEWALKS SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. g s T O R AGE \ -g CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. s. FINISH GRADING BETWEEN PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND/OR n o WnRCIE a CONTOURS SHALL FOLLOW ACONTINUOUS GRADIENT. PAD2) TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT 5NA11 BE HEAT UM J PATCHM S. EXISTING CURB WITHIN OOOOHUE STREET TO BE REALIGNED SHALL I / BE RE-USED OR RETURNED TO THE CITY, AT THE DIRECTION OF , a 3) ALL WATER MANS SHALL BE BASS 52 CEMENT UNED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK& / ag.As wEMN� DUCTILE BION PIPE. AND SSD BY ARCHITECT. S WALL BE 0 „gA .+/+ 4).. .IIINSPEC7EDSTING�DETERMINE9RTABUTY FDSERVICE R REUSE OR REPLACEMENT. :.. �e D ,. ® b.E/ 5) WATER AND SEWER EHAR IO CONSTRUCTED FEET. A MINIMUM A MN- ii� VERT HORICAL IZONTALSEPARATION CFS FEET. A ANT WHERE WATER AND SEWERATION OF IFACILITIE QBE MAINTAINED ypA' I T g .}� 8) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE lY HDPE PIPE EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED HEiffINI. 60 I, I � 7) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH SASNS TO DRAIN MANHOLES Ay x C SHALL BE .005 FEET PER FOOT. �yg ' B) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AND POLE RELOCATION SHALL BE a Z+P COMPLETED AS PER SPEgFlCAIMS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC s ti� - ,k , COMPANY. YV 9) GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED A- UNDERGROUND N ACCORDANCE WITH THE U7IUTY AGENCY _ I \ � HAVING JURISDICTION. Y + t 0 J, 10) PROPOSED 8 INCH SEWER SHALL BE CONNECTED 70 THE FISTING g.TaoV•T SESO MANHOLE MANNER TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGEE DISTRICT. 11) SHOP DRAWINGS OF THE BAYSAVER UNIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED 9.75 MP.Tj ` �. PRIOR TO COMM041 O MENT OF CONSTUCTION OF THE UNIT. R I' N EDF UPPO+ ANgpPROPRIAIELY SBD STORMCEPTOR WATER DUALITY SYSTEM 1 / o,PROPOSED MAY eE USED AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE BAYSAVER. / gxow 1 D ° O \ ,U� ID \� �2?=/Pe- r ' TABLE OF ELEVATIONS STRUCTURE L EE N D O TMH EXISTING TO-EPHONE MANHOLE Q A� ; �I ryp�• p STRUCTURE RIM INVERT 0 WH EX151ING BEWER MANHOLE I CBSN 1 9.26 7.10 a DMH DIETING DRAIN MANHOLE • EXISTING CATCH BASIN ASS+w' I p I, �c HYDRANT CUSH 2 9.50 6.85 ..a oosnNG WATER GATE UTILITY POLE DMH 3 9.60 6.75 —. .— U9R an POST TER CSSN a 9.50 7.00 FENCE CURB WATER waPocs CISH 5 8.00 8.76 • SNH PROPOSED M49R MANHOLE J\ ® I, • DMH PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE i` DMH S 9.686.36 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 8.BD (1PROPOSED CONTOUR CUSH 7 8.50 8.10 t00.D PRaPas=n sPor GRACE 1` •+SED g(Pl W I \ \ M \\ -I, PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED BUILDING — CBSN a B.60 6.to —5` PROPOSED SEWER SAYSAVER PROPOSED STORM DRAW GRDLINO FLOOR ELEVATWN•M176 � �. \ \\�I E MANHOLES 8.90 (80 _ _ 5695 (12-) —w— PROPOSED WATER LINE it— CONN. D 5 9 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN mw w PROP.6'ZCag vmdk �� To Braga sena _ TE p I`6N0 LD NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM O /I N � i'`x�fl+DOM 9TOR GE -- J SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS SITE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN / � -,� ��= PPOP.6'�36 PVL ��[Alpo• �� fR1F / — eExRAs-_ays��s� GV Prwared Sic Na61 RAW LbndominMm, LLC Eaatan band STxM•Y Assoc., hNc 282 BennDgton SL OWrleloPAer R. Mean d y M Eoaf Benton MA /1f78 \ R,Nzs g 104 LowaR St: Peabody AIA 01860 W seETim f FFT w (878)33F-8121 8'vB=TAPFRD SIEVE P�TE IMA7MV - w L�TJEE y SCALE GATEVa. wATRR MRx /_ -- S 111��• 1� 10 GOODHVE \ �, a SESD 5M lD w Ho SO \o R–10.73 CA F 13879 (67') I• alst((I D') JANUARY 14 2006 r R.Nauo T1. -BOO(PROP. R7 NR Bran Pa.wgee 91EET N0. REMSIONS 1. MARCH 22 2006 C-3 2. MONEI BER-14% 2006 CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL MANHOLE CATCH BASIN TRENCH SECTION SANITARY SEWER no sc01e no. eoale no Bods TRENCFI�SECTION z.•oIAM urxxDlE FRWE Ata mtTn no scaleno Uerxax u na,tABDEID WAx 2e.w•M Rax FRAME wR WY.1e nIPMAO _.. IABARIR Jm LO IA MW PAM uxPAwn 4ply Betl A 11t BRLx PAfWB pA13y M HAYBNE R to 3 CANmR IN.MF9 a1d ,'LAWR!SEB V! , II b B CF„�WTI,PAk PRECAST OONOiEIE CdE MQ`E l I IMT W TNFN61ma:ASI MCRETE WALL SECEN I IIAGIIRl I TWTW IRHxn �'�'m yfEmA;(M JHnM mtl Pw,bR1Yn, }AIIaL ROSE WN{BP�mn RONDE9l1lNa °ASu I Y IICGUpm BY'�MY Wn1NNODt) A'-a• WWI/bf ll®) IF BAWm . AAM WOMENNAS IBI'JS 004RIONE TEMPORARSNEL PLA .. .. .. . _°• FORMED FREEDAuJ NA4XaF BR/!Np CDNC SLM L P (TYP) BTEP AT IY QC. to L•IWT PP OP me EBmRl ATW — Pp ppP T� Pp mai' - OR W WLION AMINDIV " ILHR Pp p pPP A +1� POP Op P D GPPP rOR`1 L,W°a PP PPO OpPp _ NX FOLT B•W 1•QR91W , PPpp P PP4A A ,c xWYBNE Rm[ I I 4fMHE . LANE WTIEI m4PW J'YK 1 TEMPORARY ]/4'STIINE C YM m a 1P m Y NR 1 BREL MAN _._ 1 PRECASTCoNcRETE ME WATER MAIN I P sHam SIM HABIT aER NC�@mME -. -- TRENCH SECTION no soda CATCH BARN P�tnm LTARRMIIW xxPALm DETAIL PAMD EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE T�M-M'-P ivtOw wFLs EIMIOI CONTROL PROGRAM P uuN•A® AT 6 O.C.(MAX) 1. STARED NAY BALES,SILT FENCE,TEWORAY DIVERSION SWAYS AND SW WENT DETAIL WT W 1RBIw MRM9 NP.100 mHm BASINS SHALL SE WSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE;PLAN OR AS omnis: HANDICAP CURB RAMP c"'P"uEm Wm�'Wo°AE"'"BB✓<DxD MMOL FAMtC DIRECTED BY Tiff PROJECT ENGINEER Oi THE CONSERVATION COWAISSRIV eAaauL RU EEAN)MRSHE CN MAY Wu® PRIOR TD COMMUCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACRVMES. 20 ADDITIONAL N.T.S. P 1' REMIBED BY FIIYY omcENN HAY BALES AND 100 FT. OF SILT FOICE SHALL K REPT ON SIZE FOR MOA.caENKE. REPAIRS OR 07HO EROSION CONTROL NITERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL (A DDS%10¢aDxm INSPECT EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT TO CONFIRM THAT SAME ARE PROPERLY FUNCTMNINEL ANY ONCENCES 1 N THE EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE CORRECTED(IMMIATELY. 2 ALL SCL STOCRPILES SHALL BE Pfl07EC1E0 ADNNST EROSION. LACROSS WALI( m a a' 3. CATOH BASINS SHALL BE PROTECTED WnH FLLTERS,AS SHOWN HEREON UNTIL NO SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IS VISIBLE WRING RAINFALL EVENTS TUFT$ 4, (e uwY P(e W uBxJ WALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY. -ILII -ILII • TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASINES TO BE TALON DURING CONSTRUCIIW meat vOO1 SHALL CONFORM WITH THE'MASSKOHUSETIS EROSION AND SEDWENT CONTROL W 11146>Y I 911s IRaMNRBm BBORADE GUIDELINES,ORGAN AND SUFOLRBAN AREAS'DATED MARCH,tBBT, AND MAY S,y - S (BROOM.FINISH =ILII =ILII INCLIAK Sd1E OR ALL OF RHE FOLLOWING MEASURES: w DIRECTION OF TEMPORARY SEEDNG.TEMPORARY YU-CHING(STRAP), PERMANENT m '- L) BEEONG, HYDROSfEDINO, SODDNC, AND PLACEMENT OF HAY OR JUTE NETTING DURING WINTER himms. S S DERRB AND/DR LITTER SHALL BE REMOVED-FROM THE SITE ON A WEEKLY BASS 1 B, IF LAST G OENBRAWD DURING CONSIRUCRON,R SHALL BE WNTRCLED Pitch BY WE GF WATER TRM% SPRINNAI0 OR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION DwR T?HEOT. AT THE NTLY STA E THE PflOAM A AL1 FFIDDISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE 1:12 CURB j PERMANENTLY STABN2ED WTN LOAM M10 5®OR O1HFlR lRWNO WVEfl. 3'-B' MIN. BAYSAVER SYSTE)VI DIMENSIONS REIN As REO'0. OE°4RPlIDN /SIN FIF P sn1 JN SYalgl Ex"m Ai IM1t Enw. __•E0 a _ SEE SHEET Ci.f OF PLANS PREPARED BY JOSEPH A LAGRASSE & ° Te.z- 11,' ,Bl.r ANATM u WR LE-ExaM F z.- x J,' ,P RB- ASSOC7A7ES WC. DATED NOV. 15, 200.5 FOR ADDIDONAL DETAILS OF L sRAw.Tm m' m• F BRAS P41E IUWM 34' N' w' w' °36 510.% WALKS LAMPS, CURBING AND PAWNG c RUR/IIRAS Putt TBnmasE 1/z• 1/1' DETAIL — CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE .n WON AND CONME \E PIPE m 7.12r T.In' ID.n• It.nT 1E.o• 00 B(iQle 1 t1MN tEYBM ,a' w' w' ,P. aR• MTRAEGNT TE DcBOW TAEovEi P SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN A BYPASS PULE XE /ROSE IM£NI lY 1'j' IP Y1' ,P- WBMBFWW ATFALE n- r N GIRL, NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM WE gAYEIpR Y 'M M M Y O EBCWYWTQNN%NPOBNMpT 4 11n 7,/2- n „ PLAN I-- ' -� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS n' IB• f,' yf SITE DETAILS �arvd Fw prepared Bic E�3 Tor >2 Skana SC Nw-m RImw Cmdcmfth A UC Eastern Land Survey Amon Iso. 262 Bounfnytm S6 OrBtopher R, Nab P.1.S ^' East Briton ALA 0212B 104 LoWNf SCMA 01880 (978) s7,"°81271 SALE SS NOIED em. SECTION1-,/2•TB J• DATESt°nWJANUARY fa 2006 W m meeR°1P1 F 13679 REVISIONS T NO. 221 BoOG SHEET z A OVEAA BER Ia 2006 C-4 Gnaw 1 'P S 410 1. ZONING DISTRICT' NORM RIVER CANAL CORWoR - .�6p F. / \ GENERAL N07FS NEY&WOPoMM QED USE p�T, (A6PCC) 1 2. ASSESSORS MAP 16 LOT 372 k PART MAP 15 LOT 300 i \ l `•�a 1) THIS PLAN IS THE RESULT OF AN ON THE GROUND FIELD .. .R DEED REFERENCE BOOK 22202 PAGE 393 r SURVEY AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANS 4. EASEMENTS AGREEMENTS ETC M07ED IN ABOVE o s DEED ARE NOT SHOW ON THIS PUN. 8 , 2) UIIURES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON FIELD SURVEY AND 5. THE ENTTRE LOCUS IS SHOWN WININ FLOOD ZONE A, �6 FEMA FLOOD MAP 250102, PANEL 1, AUG 5, 1985 10 RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY IND1CA77VE OF _ 6. PLAN DATUM TAKEN FROM ABOVE FLOOD MAP, RM 6 UNDERGROUND CONDIRONS 7. LOCUS LOT AREA f2 PARCELS): 79031f ...8 STREET UNE IS APPROXIMATE . . •.•..... . . M1..... . . ._. . 3) 7NE CON7RACTOR_SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VER_IFNNG AND . .. .. DEIERMININO THE LOCA 7ION, SI&AND ELEVA PON OF.ALL .. .. _. / + EX7STTNC U71177a SHOTWV OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS gI +� PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRVC770M THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NORFIED IN WRI7ING OF ANY UTILIZES FOUND INTERFERING WIN THE ' / ° /• PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WIN THE WORK. oi' s des 4) THIS PLAN IS BASED ON THE REFERENCED PLANS DEEDS + — 3 AND THE RESUL 75 OF A FIELD SURVEY AS OF THIS DATE. _ NO CERIIF70A770N IS INTENDED AS TO PROPERTY 7177E / OR AS 70 EA7STENCE OF UNWRITTEN OR UNRECORDED EASEMEN- IO 5) THE OWNER STALL CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WTH ALL APPLICABLE y s6c sEr K / 11 CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MATERIALS AND/OR - e ME7HODS OF INSTALLA71ON OF ANY IMPROWMEW73 DEPICTED ON 7HIS PLAN. DRAWNG INDEX jg SHEET C-1 EXISTING CON0I77ONS PLAN SHEET C-2 SITE LAYOUT PLAN { SHEET C-4 ST7E DET S g UTILITY PLAN �.. ... LAW! 12 N . I n..�LYANWAN REALTY \ ` UM17ED PARTNERSHIP _a 4, / . . SURFACE IS RUBBLE / L E G E N D - F' p CONCRETE RUBBLE Q R BRICK 1 o TMH F)OSIINC TEM MA NNiHOI£ BUHOING o SMN ""N"HO MAIN MANHOLE �� (WALLB v , e DMH1. CATCH EMSIING ORNN MANHOLE EXISTING HYDRANT \ ,w E!GSTING WATER GATE UTILITY POLE It Dawn SALECURB WATER WORKS CURB FENCE LAW TTT ' t.` ? PAVELLNT SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN B�EOTTEMPORARY Yoh.4 r°e'M° SU. NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM ' •.. CHAIN IJNK FENCE RUNS ALONG PEPoMfIER OF 517E SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ^�, •081 " .' I,�" h0Y �T O Ow •a® 42''0'E oa.66 , 01 . - - EXISTING CONDITIONS ° Y , e1Mo10us N66Qr4"1(140' 10 4p"ee�» /'�� °S[RADI N018Y20 70.16' T oro North I6w Ca d mInAm, LLC Eo°tem Land Surroy Aemc. Inc, a / «• m aunire m� i .Y ',7,,wwy 282 Bennlnpfm SL ChrOtopher R. Mello ALS Y ro.w EOIf tTOetOR MA 02126 104 LOMelf St,Peabody MA 01880 .14 N.w , _ _ 'o' q.tl (97B)&If-6121 SCALE to P"�M, °:h �%. `STREET ,°_ p• . SI' II u ^.tl GppO t'F- " 0 10 to 10 80 . MR T BENCHMARK f JAANIARY 1J 2008 Lz h " R HAMANT SMID E F 387£ .. ELEVATION 16.2, N REVISIONS SHM W0. 1. NgRCI 22 2006 is Nv 20v6 C—i NOTES NORTH 1. CANAL 513S741-E 47.33 t. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED .i s,R•"i 0o'E 5770 _ SITE LIGHTING -.-. - 2, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED I �I� LANDSCAPE AREAS - me o 3. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE P CONDITIONS OF A VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE SALEM, ? :;: 4.c se R•'P1p1 MASSACHUSETTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ON _ To nN®coxmEa OCTOBER 17, 2006. �m°C 4. PROPOSED LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF INDICATED r .. .. ... ... IMPROVEMENT. .. .._ _. ._ .. .. ... ..... 5- ALL DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM R•"e TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 6. PARKING SPACE STRIPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH WHITE REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT. UFFER ZONE 100 BOUNDARY I, I I'-f�%FayRNc a+aert WVl � Sp ' *t 9 . ave maPnso CAP m ovdms b bjl 1pC"lIW 016E11gL5 ro woR wwwws e S 4t wurur x MT MW LA wls � re' h a:p w m m y�NQ ,A V " J �N- .1, V, Dp F7. RIVERFRON7 . QPQ� 2 BO,7NDARY I 8 , ci� °P b` wir a e _ NOTE: slm xm m § r� HORIZONTAL DESIGN TAKEN FROM PLANS BY ` �e as t610Ao iu slaxro°0 maaNna ' i` JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE Ac ASSOCIATES, INC. '.. Ir K 01EIIW IOR6 ' 1 6 a b E �r N3s KION KIo51(O; e r wo a - / s y'$ .,� - SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN ar-r a ,r m O Im oral am sP) Nom- nR , ' / y,•_- m Ria"�S�4K 40-C NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM Bn•00' SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ' - • \', SNPE FlWRT - O � t I` AUs�oT " SITE LAYOUT PLAN R'LMP 4r UANi Of.Ehb�g�U4y "d a'N13 rl 26�• "'WI i NOB'ui'16'W ORIr'ES >F R9 NOISB'?OT )0.15• NO 740' NEVI 510EWNJ( Prepmed Far Prapare0 8y. ' 4.84• y PNMw 9.TCa nuc 20.4N North Raft tm St.dlfum. LLC Eastern Land Survey Assoc., fic. -. MA a aao N11-�,�D.W 282 BennMgtm SL Grlatopher R. MOJ10 ALS - East Boston MA 02128 104 Lowell SL Peabo/ MA 01980 (978) 531-8121 SCAV ?' GOODHUE STREET b 0 10 20 w 60 aavZy DATE F 13879 JANUARY f; 2008 p. 1Jr�aarP SHEEP N0. - REWSONS 1- MARCH 2Z 2006 1. DEMDunpN.SHALL BE RXXRWCTED IN ACIDDRpANCE WI7M ALL v „atD 1) THE CONTRACTOR MALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VEWNING APPLICABLE SLAWSHAT. .IND REGuunaNB. uEMGtmoN RAATERIAL / / AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION. SIZE AND ELEVATION MALL BE MSPOSED OF IN A LICENSED FACILITY. WETTING O' ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN'OR NOT SHOWN DU SHALL BE USED FOR OUST CONTROL DURING -THE DE110UT10N PHASE \ �I� \ THESE PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ...- 2 003TIN0 PAVEMENT ON 317E SHALL DU ORUSMED AND RECYCLED / ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY A5 BASE COURSE FON NEWLY PAVED AREAS, --e U71UTIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED fi 3. NEW SIDEWALKS SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. / a 90 yTOflA OE \` _s CONSTRUCTIONPROCEEDING ANDA WITH TH AWE RE]1EDIAL ACTION C FINISH GRADING BETWEEN PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND/OR a 5 ACED CONCRETE BEFORE PROCEEONO NITH THE WORK CONTOURS SHALL FOLLOW A CONTINUOUS GRADIENT. / ; e o DDMPSIER�PAO .�N Z) PATCHED. INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE NEAT .{ & EXISTING CURB WITHIN GOODHUE STREET TO BE REALIGNED SHALL BE RE-USED OR RETURNED TO THE CITY. AT THE DIRECTION OF e e /� 3) ALL WATER MANS SHALL BE CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED I THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK& / 8 _ Aa,45 � L.g DUCTILE IRON HPE, AND SIZED BY ARCHITECT. a .. eAY6 INR SERVICE.*/,E 4).. INSPEjINGCTED SENOR DETERMINE S ITABET CONNECTIONS SUET. BE INSPECTED TO pE1QRMINE SUITABBItt FOR RETISE OR REPLACEMENT. .... B) WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MN- .. NUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM q VERTICAL SEPARATION 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED'. yg�,�a• ® I NHEf� WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES CROSS. .. T 9 / D) ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE 12' HOPE HPE EXCEPT a �* C AS 07NERYASE NOTED HEREON, 7) MINIMUM PITCH FROM CATCH BASINS TO DRAIN MANHOLES y / x SHALL BE .003 FEET PER FOOT. 9,6oya\Z 8) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERNCE AND POLE RELOCATION SHALL BE Zb+t COMPETED AS PER SPECIFICATIONS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC R yZ NT COMPANY. t9) CAS, TELEPHONE AND CARIE SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED N\ UNDERGROUNDRJMS� ANCE WITH THE UTUtt AGENCY H �O Ali 10) PROPOSED B INCH SEWER SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING d i;, c,Ta CPI SSD MANHOLE IN A MANNER TO BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT. 11) SHOP DRAWINGS OF THE BAYSAVER UNIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED R a 05 ON - - � PRIOR TO COMME39.NOENENT OF C NSTUCiION OF 7HE UNIT. E OF&PEN G `1 \ i AN APPROPRIATELY SIZED SjMCEPTOR WATER QUALITY SYSTEM OF PROPOsta 'k\ MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNAATE TO THE BAYSAVER. r ` ` BgOW - / 6TDR JV e I / j - �* � � � _ • ,� � .;: / I N O � e;/ � / TABLE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE L E G E N D A / ELEVATIONS S �^ \ P I� \ `R/� _ o TMH UISTNG TELEPHONE MANHOLE Q� D ryCQ.p� STRUCTURE RIM INVERT �Y D 0 4.1H EXISTING SEWER NPNNCE CBSN 1 9.25 7.10 o OHM IXISIING DRAIN MANHOLE �Q ® EMSTNO CATCH BASIN DUSTHC HYDRANT QM 2 8.50 6.85 .w EXISTING WATER GATE 0 Unutt POUE v \ / 1 DMH 3 9.60 8.75 U�yDWATIM WMIKS \\ p \\_ cesN a BAD 7-00 —.- FTN�a C6SI'! B 8.00 6.75 • SMR PROPOSED MAIN MANHOLE J\ \O \ 6.35 ( • MR PROPOSED GRAIN MANHOLE �. \\ elm j. \ OMH 6 9.88 6.60 (IYi -•[fQ}— PRWOSED COMM BASINPROF'OSED CATCH CBM 7 8.50 6.10 Iwo PROP O4.D sl O GRADE \ \ \ D \ PROPOSED UORIT . Dno nom,, I \ PROPOSED BUILD{NG CBSN a 8.50 6.10 —S— PROPOSED SEWER BAYSANER \ —p_ PROPOSED SHORN DRAIN I \� / \ \ MANHOLES &90 5.70 (13') G8pL6Np FLOOD ESF'AT10N�0.75 %—� a &95 1Y —W— PROPOSED WATER LIME SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN A7S� D P,op. 6'ZPp7-K ��yODNR l_f- a To BlId90 O _ P pE ,� ;e?oR6E !yM NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM 1-7 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS x = , _— �- -- - SITE GRADING R9e UTILITY PLAN PMP_ raor.s•sIR M we I RX' sEwaAsxvlgy=s='= ------ 282 ona iondpmA'IDBn, LLC Easfun Land 9 ago PULS, Ma \\ a nzc / s a s _� -- a '�— BPWE 07126 1044 St.. Mea Peabody MA 01960 —� DO9TNo aT'eWIK aD+aR —' W �� (976)331-8121 6'r6'TNTNI BLEW ApROSVATE LOCARDI0— , W —��RLRTET SCALE 1. 20, `IEEEVE a� O6NNBC WATER 14aNO �rJ S \\ 4 �L a/ G gsp SIM '4 0 '10 w 40 60 10.73 I .L33f 157'1 DATEa:;,Mt F 13879 I. 3.7st (IDS JANUARY 14 2006 r NMro ae I m SOD(PROP-67 A.T 3X317 P£J0938 STREET NO REHSTO,VS . 1. MARCH 22 2006 C—3 Z. N0419IB64 14 2006 MANHOLE CATCH BASIN TRENCH SECTION I IAM.DI no SCCIB no IBealeno. scala no gads u• TRENCH SECTION YNAIOIE FRAUE Arm mLm no gaols ORnIIJ NDA,LALELIFL oRNx __ r ' YRim BW Ir N YI'I MI IRMIL AND®M$ WPAtfD �1 a•@!SIAL PANIID PA4ID 1MIAVm M PAVED IHAYBALE 2 ro o cans LMWD mm s m s QI LW'WL„BMA r InrM s m r w a MEED .. DOD MECHST MEEETE LIME =F° MIT W INEMOI FFOCK T MORED WALL SECTION p�O ONaa10 INi(i1LL I MIT W TRENCH E"Lj m 9G)Enm O (N1 Mx and Pm W°rbnn }}A111E0��DOaL WAM �'p'LlEI,D r I Y BY"' b°.mob MY Wa1Y1NM) A'•D' DIIMTAR MBNiB I BAWR °. ,. AIME IMO OD Af LOGL mYMRONS ' EEMPGWRY SOIX�) REWNm n y LOLL MOMS. SIAL PLA1E - .. .. . . r .. .- nVea 6'LONG aLLCN SA`CTY TYPE NAMES IBI PINY .. WIM QC, i (TVP) $IEP AT IY �, i 0 ALP O O Ae0 0 m 1 B' ,IDMEM IDIMMIY BC � 00 4 � �n AO ASA aI BiBVM°If MILT >y> 4 0p0 >0 y040 INLET 44 4 c>.A 4 r(ELM IL1NJ 440 4 PJ p r N•W Imml YIN B'IgM 1'QNY® 4 A.P { HAYBAE sTmEDIKE OUDEI m.1 y DIr a IIx I -� i TEMPORARY E awtu.NATE r MIN j77- a¢Drsr ro�E 0uE WATER MAIN - r LYYlyd Am, E. NWRr Eossreg1 TRENCH BECTON Fpin°°""' no sods CATCH HAI M Or GROW=grow FOU"AW WAVED DETAIL ' PAVIII EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE r,a•Aa-r ti°mEN PM'TB Ot0901N CONTROL PROGRAM MESIAL a 5® AT 6 0.0 GIRO- 1. STAKED HAY BALCS.SILT FENCE,TEMPORAY DIVERSION SWAIM AND SEDIMENT DETAIL WDT W,mTNN mama K..Tm SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE MIN THIS PLAN OR AS 07HERMSE HANDICAP CURB RAMP m11PAClm PROVm°N- V91M"P"°"` DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OR THE CONMRVATION NMMISSION BAOIDu MM °>NM° HAY mm PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 20 ADDITIONAL N.T.S. r ,• UM SHORING"E Dna'DwecTl°I HAY BALES AND 1001 FT. OF SL7 FENCE SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE FOR WOA MWIX p. REPAIRS OR OTHER EN090N CONIRDL NEEDS. THE CONRRACUR STALL ( �RpO QtDy,m INSPECT EROSION CONTROL.FACILITIES WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT TO CONFIRM THAT SAME ARE PROPERLY FLNRCDONINO. ANY DEFICIENCIES Y IN THE EROSION CONTROL FAGUT ES SHALL BE CORRECTED ILIEOIMMY. —M�- 2 ALL SOL STOCKPILES SNAIL BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION. 1 j__ RAMPS WALK � m 4r S CATCH BASINS 94ALL BE PROTECTED WITH FILTERS,AS MOWN HEREON UNIL NO SEDWRNT TRANSPORT IS VISIBLE DURING RAINFAIL EVENTS FILTERS SHALL BE INSPECTED YAEILLY AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY- BADR uYx r f°•M,moq =IIII —IIII ♦ TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION y� m•^T BAaDWL WALL CONFORM WITH THE'MASSACHUSETTS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 3 ND B,a¢>Y IIII=_ III I� p�yTDlmm RNaLP>➢E GUDRINES,URBAN AND SUBURBAN ART"DAIED MARCH,1897,AND MAY S S' (BROOM.FINISH II� _IIIIIIIIINCLUDE SCARE FIR ALL OF THE FOLLONIO MEASURES w SS DIRECTION OFTEMPORARY SEEDING TEMPORARY MLLCMMG (STRAW). PERMANENT ¢ EL)WEDGEA HYDROSEELING. SODDING. ANO PLACEMENT OF NAY ORUUIE METING DURING WINTER MONTHS. S DEBRIS AND/CR LITTER SHALL BE REMOVER FROM THE SITE ON A WEOILY zBASIS& IF OUST B GENERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION•n SHALL BE CONRtO11DN Pitch BY USE OF WATER TRUCKS.SPRNNNG OR TEMPORARY STARBJZAI Dorm METHODS7. AT DHE CO,PLEION OF THE PROJECT,ALL OSIUMBED AREAS S ALL BE ,:,2 CURB PERMANENTLY ST�TED WITH LOAM AND SEED OR OTHER GROUND COVER. I 3'-6• MIN. BAYSAVER SYSTEM DIMENSIONS ' OE3LRWOdn ,/RN Bvs ,v SraTEu CIA srsTDN CIN aK,FM ,M BYSILI RUIN AS ftE0'D. N WeMIT$FPMaTW SFE SHEET CIA OF PLANS PREPARED BY JOSEPH O. LAI.^!7ASSE E EEPAMTmD IT IExcM m' ar 7B.z'U Y .ze z,• a,- ,r CID- ASSOLYA7ES wr- DATED Nov.NOL! 19, 2005 FOR ADDIDONAL DETAILS OF n.,' P BRAS PUTT IMca u• /T b' / asr MGRS WALK$ LAMPS CURBING AND PANNE. e FEYMYPASaPUTEM'IFESE P/Y I/Y ap a„• JAT DETAIL — CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N GRDW Arm awrtcnm PWT m 744 P.s- ,D.n• ,z.»+ ENO• n0 SCalO 0MT 4MB1N ,B- b' b' ,C 1B w° ATEmmtMOWI r SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN N AM INVERT B1PA9 PLATE xBEWT Aeer<�N,ETE ,Y ,T- ,r ,,. m• L .WMT. AT BASE a- Y .9 °- °- NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM N WMT W! DAVMETOL Y Y M Y N PLAN - N nBOWMafMH pITABOL2YNIMYMT .,,E .,YY —7_11F N' I— `°' SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 0 EtB°W%PE OVCPNYIC 1]' 12' IO N'” XY ' SITE DETAILS T, 7rw— PMPWVd By _ _ 3 w - z TDs eHe MLFBI RRs diI S n/lTNAIhN, LLC Easton Land Survey ALS. mo. - I 282 Benn/n9tan t4n St. IBtOPn6r R. Mob ALS. East Boston MA 02128 104 LOWeL SL MA 01980 SALE SS NOTED : SECTION a Ts�\ D 1 INCHES z s . . ab9m°, st°nA DATE b nar`S - JANUARY 1.; 2008 ,1J11"°"° ° mmai1i F 13879 •`1f'...._- REVISIONS SLEET N0. 1. MARCH 22, P1706 Scnm� Z NOVEMBERA 2006 C-4 Il�rv(� {v61FP-1wr C!AAKCE7— 23600dhc�e �Jt�.� f�5vs1 2014 �✓IS9nZar1 Chw�e 1�tJeS} II 7 _ r 1 L 28 Goodhue outbuilding Board Meeting Attendance 7. ,. „ �.. opened, HEARING STATUS: heard, cont'd Chuck Puleo Y Dale Yale Y Ben Anderson s"Fo ,: ; v YT;,. -z -" eta rvr WTI" Matt Veno Y Kirt Rieder U Tim Ready/Noah Koretz Y(Tim) YVoa Helen Sides Y _ Randy Clarke Y Bill Grisetm-SmIa t mvnaYNA A majority(5)is a quorum Need 5 to have meeting, 6 to pass SP, 5 to pass subdivision/ANR *special meeting CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD X014 SEP 11 P 1 `n September 11, 2014 FILE K CITY CLERK, SALEM,MASS'. North River Canal, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street(Map 16, Lot 372),North River Apartments, Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit Decision of Planning Board to grant Request for Insignificant Change to building footprint and demolition of existing buildings The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, July 17, 2014 to discuss your request for the approval of an Insignificant Change to the previously approved Site Plan Review, Wetland and Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District Special Permit, to allow after-the-fact demolition of a brick outbuilding, which according to the originally approved plans, was to be integrated into the new development. The discussion was continued to July 31, 2014 (but the meeting was cancelled), and August 7, 2014. The discussion was concluded and a vote conducted on August 7,2014. A letter submitted by Thomas Galvin of JD LaGrasse& Associates, Inc. on July10, 2014, states that the outbuilding, designed as a community room for development residents, was excessively costly to develop and was omitted from the construction drawings. The brick outbuilding was demolished and the community space was been integrated into the footprint of the constructed building. The petitioner presented the current site plan "Site Improvement Plan" sheet C-1.0, dated May 13, 2013. The Board also considered the series of Demolition Delay Waivers issued by the Salem Historical Commission (dated August 13,2004,November 4, 2004, and April 21, 2005) illustrating the process that resulted in Historical Commission approval for demolition of all existing buildings on the site, including the brick outbuilding. The Planning Board voted six (6) in favor(Mr. Puleo—Chair, Ms. Yale, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Mr. Clarke, and Mr. Griset)and none (0) opposed, to grant the approval of the Insignificant Change request, approving the demolition of the brick outbuilding, and the resulting modified building footprint as shown on the"Site Improvement Plan" dated May 13, 2013. This determination shall become part of the record for this project If you require further information,please contact Dana Menon, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning& Community Development at (978)$19-5685. Sinceel (Ty,�Char1 P o rman Salem Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk . o I t Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)745-9595 EXT. 311 FAX(978) 740-0404 WAIVER OF THE DEMOLITION DELAY ORDINANCE It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has waived the Demolition Delay Ordinance for the proposed demolition as described below, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act(M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. Address of Property: 28 Goodhue Street Name of Record Owner: North River Canal LLC Description of Demolition Work Proposed: Demolition of all areas designated as non-shaded on the building plan, entitled "Scheme 2 (08104104), " with the exception of the non-shaded area at the easterly end of the 4-story block nearest the North River Canal. Extent of demolition on the Goodhue Street fagade will start at a column bay near the center of the Goodhue street faVade and run northward to the end of the 4-story block. As a revision to the waiver application, the owner has withdrawn application to demolish the shaded area indicated on Scheme 2. In consideration of this waiver, the owner has agreed to the following, which is to be documented in a written agreement with Historic Salem, Inc., as generally indicated below: ■ The majority of the structure shaded on said plan shall remain visible in any new redevelopment; • Historic Salem, Inc. shall have further design review input; ■ The Owner shall hold Structures North harmless for pro bono consulting services; ■ Owner shall provide the Salem Historical Commission with a copy of the written instrument between the Owner and Historic Salem Inc. which documents the agreement; ■ The Owner shall provide the Salem Historical Commission and Historic Salem, Inc. with a copy of the demolition plan as submitted to the Building Inspector; and Further review of the non-shaded area of the 4-story block nearest the North River Canal is continued to the meeting of Sept. 15, 2004. Owner hereby agrees to waive the requirement of a 30-day preliminary report. Dated: 8/13/2004 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By: 4 � � I ?Z� THIS IS NOT A DEMOLITION PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals) prior to commencing work. 04 Salem Historical Commission 120 Washington St. -SALEM,MASSACHUSETrS01970 (978)745-9595 EXT.311 FAX(978)740-0404 APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF THE DEMOLITION DELAY ORDINANCE Pursuant to the Historic District's Act (M.G.L. Chapter 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission Ordinance,application is hereby made for issuance of a Waiver of the Demolition Delay Ordinance for demolition as described below. Building Construction Date, if known: 1900+/— Address ofPro Property: 28 Goodhue Street P Name of Record Owner: North River Canal LLC Description of Demolition Work Proposed: Demolition of the two existing structures, which includes the main building, a four-story structure with a footprint of approximately 32 , 500 square feet; and the secondary building, which is a one- story structure of approximately 5, 000 square feet. The main building is unoccupied, and the secondary building is currently occupied by a small automotive repair shop. It is proposed that both buildings be demolished down to the existing foundation level. Signature of Owner Novlapy L Tel. #: (973) 744-0212 o eo ren i, squire S ra ini, Se a£ini, Darling & Correnti, LLP Mailing address: Federal Street City: Salem State:_Zip: MA 01970 Commonwealth of Massachusetts ` City of Salem � n � S Inspectional Services UV x.�..-�..�R-.,. -y'._ 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 Phone:(978)745-9595 x5641 LkERC I Pf Application For Building Permit (For Buildings other than a One- or Two-Family Dwelling) I(This Sectiori for Official Use Only)A ; +k nt p � PIN B 05-IQ 76 UP 943a = a .s Date'Apphed 10/8/2004 It ° ter ' ry , yr t at ilk t 4 1 ti[ME' s Building Official(Print name) 'SECTION 1' SITE LOCATION (Please indicate Block#and Lot#,f&,locations for whicha'streetddress i as not available)] 28 GOODHUE STREET , Salem, MA ' "" .«� ,bF — ry . ;�;'„k SECTION2 PROPOSED WORK ) fi r r t`x .�, k '€i ' ,.p. _;, . &" ..t Are Building plans and/or construction documents being supplied as part of this permit application?: No Is an Independent Structural Engineering Peer Review Required? Yes[] No❑ Brief Description of Proposed work: 382-05 PARTIAL DEMO TJS SECTION 3: COMPLETE,THIS SECTION IF EXISTING BUILDING UNDERGOING RENOVATION ADDITION;OR`CHANGE IN "17USE OR OCCUPANCY(Check Here`ll P if an Existing Building Evaluation is enclosed(see 780 CMR 100W �y,:, 5 r _ - ;z .:: +w~ 7. Existing Use Group: Proposed Use Group: re r SECTION 4 BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA �� ` :� F' „ _, m, , NM 77 Existing Proposed No. of Floors/Stories (Include basement levels) &Area Per Floor(sq.ft.) Total Area (sq. ft.) and Total Height (ft.) SECT ION5USEGROUP "� r g4 r"REN 3M rIt ° f mySECTION 6 ':CONSTRUCTION TYPE ryd3 t ry t a _ .. _ Vac Land/Ind s , ;SECTION 7l SITE INFORMATION(referto 780 SM R 111.0 for detads on each item) =' Water Supply: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal: Trench Permit: Debris Removal: Public Check if inside Flood ZoneElMunicipal will not required Licensed Disposal Site or or Identify Zone: Is enclosed ❑ or specify: Railroad right-of-way: Hazards to Air Navigation: MA Historic commission Report Process: Not applicable ❑ Is Structure within airport approach area? Is their review completed? or Constant to Build Enclosed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ t a ` Axa : ' SECTION 8 CONTENT CERTIFICATE OF t)CCUPANCYa ,r *ion ,3 fF ' �..ttY ��pp , .,SP. a v✓urvmam yttr. .u,.nrtaMazrvrt�, t m5-FeHtH:.._ w�,Au, varsnmm,rtuma.vxrf A,I+! E .uu ::.a.fl4 Edition of Code: Use Group(s): Type of Construction: Occupant Load per Floor Does the building contain a sprinkler system?:False Special Stipulations: t f " SECTION 9 PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORtZAT10N K T,HISAS-NOMI aPERMIT . , Commonwealth of Massachusetts pp ,E City of Salem Inspectional Services t " tea" 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 Phone:(978)745-9595 x5641 �RECEIPT NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC 282 BENNINGTON STREET BOSTON MA 02128 If applicable,the property owner hereby authorizes NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC 87 WATER STREET To act on the property owner's behalf,in all matters relative to the work authorized by this building permit application. m ( pPx2)*' �tNO T a " SECTION 10 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL! Please fill out A endi (if budding!s less than 35,000 cu ft ofenclosed space and/or not under Construction Control then skip Section 10.1) a ' OR-' a;..s 10 1 Registered Professional Responsible for Construction Control `rB . ., .. —A... itE�a? Name Phone Email Registration Number Address Discipline Expiration Date g¢ ,. ,,t_.10 2 General Contractor #via.V' Ir ! - T "� �' ! '+4E� 7k _. . .4 __ Fa;..7�$Aw'—;.m3. plf.=,,.,.;1+ .r== _: �� _ ._,mak.a'-3: �.7.n �. Company Name License no. and License Type if Applicable Name of Person Responsible for Construction Address: Phone Email Address SECTION 11.WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT(M G L A Worker's Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of Industrial Accidents must be completed and submitted with this application.Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit. Is a signed Affidavit submitted with this application? owe :ZSECTION 12 CONSTRUCTION COST AND PERMIT FEE ` , Total Estimated Costs(Labor and Materials): Building Permit Fee: $205.00 Enclose check payable to the City of Salem, Ck# rsK. s SECTION 13: SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT" �; 614 3 r By entering my name below,I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and understanding. (617) 293-1525 Please print and sign name Title Telephone Address: 87 WATER STREET Date: 10/8/2004 � � x ;'. Name4. � aDace� Municipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval p a r'v �+ t0 vv�s�m sF ua�'�6 ' >r i ; 2 11 ;ras,-ue�,; au,., m� am_� map w MUM. C41c THIS.,IR1N0TA PERMITN � 212 iA 06a ,"I-5 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Cityof Salem120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA01970(978)745-9595x5641 Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy ' Permit No. 8-2005-0376 FEE PAID: $205.00 PERMIT TO BUILD DATE ISSUED: 10/8/2004 This certifies that NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC has permission to erect, alter, or demolish a building 28 GOODHUE STREET Map/Lot: 160372-0 ._ amu. 1 as follows: DEMO 382-05 PARTIAL DEMO{TJS- rn *„ ii i w ° e � Contractor Name: DBA: `' Contractor License No: " T f f a I 10/8/2004 itU 9,k3 Building Official SFfI f' i6 Date ,... KE This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this permit is commenced within six months after issuance.The Building Official may grant one or more extensions not to exceed six months each upon written,request pix ' s �. , iii U ' q _. , — �,a.�.tl_. ,p All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved application and the approved construction documents for which this permit has been granted. .r { ,h a ' "y+ilp ;�?' u,fix & All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structtpures shall be in compliance with the local zoning by-laws and codes. 1W tMa This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible Nom access street or road and shall be maintained open for public inspection for the entire duration of the work until the completion of the same. I�°jf �� i dh �,,- h, ,:4 i The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable signatures by the Building and Fire Officials are provided ori th s"permit. 9ilr r'r HIC #: "Persons contracting with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund"(as set forth in MGL c.142A). n _ P' f Restrictions: °� ! Lir s �Uit "tk I dl n Ir KKU,,. Building plans are to be available on site. All Permit Cards are the property of the PROPERTY OWNER. Commonwealth of Massachusetts A %n Citv of Salem 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595x5641 nna Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy structure CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT Excavation PERMIT TO BE POSTED IN THE WINDOW Footing INSPECTION RECORD Foundation Framing Mechanical - bM � : . �� i ,t i4•xt.. a Insulation INSPECTION: BY DATE Chimney/Smoke Chamber %( " ,r 75rn;+, .tl_ FinalT., Plumbing/Gas Rough:Plumbing �� Odklf, Rough:Gas Final I, r �..,=a. ,:° , —.. l,. �� A.O� i�8� Electrical �..er.�.: "`�( a „;L+x' Ii= ..6C1?. ;41 1 II; ff Service Lhi }I� I'`"� Roughr �� ty 888 Final F ��{ i t•,r i Im- FGIIP Fire DepartmentI� Preliminary mi Final i'ry' R IM Health Department lo— I' a Preliminary Final i Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)745-9595 EXT.311 FAX(978) 740-0404 WAIVER OF THE DEMOLITION DELAY ORDINANCE It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has waived the Demolition Delay Ordinance for the proposed demolition as described below, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act(M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. Address of Property: 28 Goodhue Street Name of Record Owner: North River Canal LLC Description of Demolition Work Proposed: Per the building plan, entitled "Scheme 2 (08/04/04), demolition of the non-shaded area at the easterly end of the 4-story block nearest the North River Canal. Dated: 11/4/2004 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By: THIS IS NOT A DEMOLITION PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals)prior to commencing work. 10/19/04 ICE 10:44 FAX 078 741 4003 SSWdC LLP Q002 SERAFINI. SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORMCm"& 03 FEDERAL STREET SALOn C MASSACHUSETTS Ojg7o dOOw R SEEI�Ope♦g ex .q0f,00.Saft4rm. L TE"POgpwe .ap000¢OJNU,1,a 916-744-M12 700-480-2743 TCLECUPWR October 19, 2004 e70.7�-.003 v=a 'E--- Jane Jane A. Gay, Clerk Sales. Historical Commission One Salem Green, 2" Floor Sales, Massachusetts 01970 Re: AWlicatioa for Waiver of Demolition Delay Ordinance north River Canal LLC 28 Goodhue Street Dear Ms. Gay: On behalf of the North River Canal LLC, Please continue the scheduled Petition for the waiver of Demolition Delay Ordinance for a Portion of the building located at 28 Goodhue Street to the Cossission's Scheduled seetilig an Wednesday, November 3, 2004. We are vorkinq with our architect and structural eng;-Ser on the feasibility of constructing a . By virtue of this request for continuance, North River Canal LLC hereby agrees to extend the time frame by which the Comission is required to make a finding. Thank you for Your consideration of this request. Sincerely, North River Canal LLC Byr}ts gttor�ep�/�.��y� J C. Correnti JCC:dl cc: North River Canal TSC ,10/19./04 TUR lora FAX 978 741 4893 SSW LLP 0001 SERMgK SF.RAFft DARLNG&COR tMM LLP AftmW 6 At Law 63 Few Sbeat S 01870 A MMAL S� TELEMOM PIN Y4"= JOINEOAW.9ks R Usam X74 40�I►COo�Bfii PLEASE DELIVER TW F IOULOW MG PALM TO: NAUL- JmftA.Gey,Cort lux- CRY ofSahm watwial cmumilAou Tom+ lOPIER (9M 74o4m FILDR& jumbC Coryeld4 K"mm PAGES(ial ogdis caWsh=): 2 DATE SEND_ October 19,2004 CLUNTNUMIU R: M WACK- If&MbaPIWWMVA*tMstra e.Ca"7"4n2andm*Am; D=oLud. CONFEDErfnAUTY NOTTC.H THE DO(UMWTSACOOMPANYMTHIS TELECOPYT'RAN$l UMONCONTAINRIPORWTW FROM THE LAW FIRM OF SFMAFM SERAFK DARLING & COARMA ILP WHIG$ IS CONFzcwfTALORPRIVIIECM IMDwORMAIMONtSINTY2 DmToBEFoR1HEUSBOFTHE II RVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ON TMS TRAALSAffSSION staff iF YOU ARE NOT TSE B R"MNI.BEAWARETHATANYI MOZS 1RE,COPYRIQ�OMRZB mONORUM OF THE CONTFId!'S OF THIS TELECOM BIFORMATM IS PROHMnW. IF YOU HAVE RECEIMTM TELECOPYJKERROVPLEASEN(nWYM BYTELEMOMBORmTELySo THAT WE CAN ARRANGE FOR 7wREnuEVALDFTmolti DrALDOCUbGNM j «�'+ +�•rc HMHKUN I HN HSSUC:I H I tS 401 334 405'2 P.163/03 rracl.f:�le RENTABLE AREA -- --- SECTION OF BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED NORTH RIVER CANAL I � I 1 iI � ' 1 1 I 1 i I 1 I � 1 ,':Foye 6TOR1.!I: I I I rJ 1 �..�.. L_ ---_—__ GOOORM STREET �1 PARTIAL SITS PLA_ N�� ' SCALEs 1/64'■1'-O' N vievar rersr alurim MW NORTH RIVER CANAL POTENTIAL SALVAGABLE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. SCHEME 2 MIXED USE a.ra Aug. 4. 2004 Aa.o 0411 DEVELOPNSW PROJEC C wu.M ar TH ^1°�D MH AHAIEDNIAN •ab80Oi7�!` Goodhue Street au■(Ic Nyasa CNEFf15 pd01E`1s Salem, Yossachuseth SCHEME 2 NGIY TOTAL P.03 . o t�a Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET,SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978) 745-9595 EXT. 311 FAX(978)740-0404 WAIVER OF THE DEMOLITION DELAY ORDINANCE It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has waived the Demolition Delay Ordinance for the proposed demolition as described below, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act(M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. Address of Property: 28 Goodhue Street Name of Record Owner: North River Canal LLC Description of Demolition Work Proposed: Demolition of remaining structures shown as the shaded area on the building plan, entitled "Scheme 2 (08/04/04), resulting in the demolition of the entire structure on the site. Dated: 4/21/2005 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By: � /��7 THIS IS NOT A DEMOLITION PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals)prior to commencing work. Commonwealth of Massachusetts e° City of Salem rsk ° 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595x5641 r it e n Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy Permit No. 8-2005-0895 PERMIT BUILD FEE PAID: $105.00 ®p DATE ISSUED: 5/5/2005 This certifies that FRED & BARNEY'S DEMOLITION has permission to erect, alter, or demolish a building,_ 28 GOODHUE STREET Map/Lot: 160372-0 as follows: DEMO 929-05 DEMO STRUCTURE 'JB mry �. . . A ,a is .. 7� m a � t r h Sp Contractor Name: r t € : ' , F '2 Afn rt �4 DBA: rrs yi „q f tfg it Contractor License No: itz' f k ate t as 1 �3�&` 5/5/2005 '«t4Building Official r Date 01it'. 01 This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this permit is commenced within six months after issuance.The Building Official may grant one or more extensions not to exceed six months each iupon written request.-IQla rpIt:M�, .' 'U11 ` C`.. '� {' ..:,.�s�t�:a�a�la!= jkF me`„h -r�F ri�I� �'l Ih t.: wA, .p All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved application and the approved construction documents for which this permit has been granted. MUM, All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structures shall be in compliance with the local zoning by-laws and codes. it r.J .'i''..i' J,; This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible from access street or road and shall be maintained open for p'ubkc inspection for the entire duration of the work until the completion of the same. } kH, The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable_signatures by the Building and Fire Officials are provided on this permit. s " F °' HIC #: "Persons contracting withith unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund"(as set forth in MGL a142A). v +i. } u li '� t�w�� ' Restrictions: iv �� e n y vlk aa+E� 7.�*"r u Y",c r Building plans are to be available on site. All Permit Cards are the property of the PROPERTY OWNER. Commonwealth of Massachusetts /6 m City of Salem 120 Washington Sl,3rd Floor Salem,IAA 01970(976)745-9595x5641 ' Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy Structure CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT TO BE POSTED IN THE WINDOW Excavation a Footing INSPECTION RECORD Foundation Framing Mechanical s - �• Insulation INSPECTION: 1 ABY` , t,. DATE Chimney/Smoke Chamber wna..dui�.rx -rs: Final ter_ Plumbing/Gasa I. Rough:Plumbing Rough:Gas gg .... x4! ",,�,?p .: ge,m j '� :g•asv�se ; xi'`+5k ..� § t� { Final f; :s4�"o-'ir�z°ai 0", - +� E[.+.asS+" ., Electrical ' t �+ e f ' ix E ` ns :na, i< :a r x -^�:.• �,p i 1�a.- miry Service xi Rough ,t Ir z t i-CO4 n v` Final }f Fire Departmentz 41 " �E 'r rvx•»�^ TMtgwf rte; �EIr k 9 �n'y � ..t PreliminaryIN. SP !41 r I t s d Final Kri i�„ i r r'r s 'g -1 t t fT kuk Health Department �,„,,,,;»..W ,�, _ a Fi ai a �b k' Preliminary Final Commonwealth of Massachusetts \ e { City of Salem 2 Inspectional Services RE "�` CEIP-""T r"""t 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 Phone:(978)745-9595x5641 Application For Building Permit (For Buildings other than a One- or Two-Family Dwelling) vPr (Thls Sechon for Offlclal Use Only), , t "m i I ria r r gaft a, lt PIN: B 2005 0895 g � DateApplled 5/5/2005 al US m=h ! ` gf. , I n '.ct5(�1 r Building Official(Pont name):.�;i w r` `...#`3 ,. m: �r ,,, 5�fr-'x `ii'1,i..�' ,'.m !�.,.... - ' ;SECTION 1:'SITE LOCATION (Please in Block#and Lot#for locations forwhicti la street address is not available) 28 GOODHUE STREET , Salem, MA �..r- .i,.SECTION Y. PROPOSED WORK`.. r�'.�.�k't-' I rte" :ktt•�. „ :.' Are Building plans and/or construction documents being supplied as part of this permit application?: No Is an Independent Structural Engineering Peer Review Required? Yes[—] No❑ Brief Description of Proposed work: 929-05 DEMO STRUCTURE JB °SECTION 3: COMPLETE THIS SECTION IF EXISTING BUILDING UNDERGOING RENOVATION,''ADDITION;OR CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY,(Check Here if an Existing Bmldmg Evaluation is enclosed(see 780 CMR 34)) ! Q 9 &+ r1= i it i i. ,,. m 3..mT. ,,," '„moi' .._,.:jc'mSa,€a_ ..t � e Existing Use Group: Proposed Use Group: f =SECTION 4 BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA 1- "3 ' Eaaal {A a _ _ _,.,a A• h.i-, !f ,�kM1,knce,n.i . i.. ,..i... Existing Proposed No. of Floors/Stories (Include basement levels) &Area Per Floor(sq.ft.) Total Area (sq. ft.) and Total Height (ft.) 1SECTION 5 USE GROUP I 'j�� mn - mxig ti% re, ..+_rc13:riQ4,iHu- 2`.aau`: ."..ui !}suvM�. C. SECTION 6 CONSTRUCTION TYPE ' _ ! x o Vac Land/Ind SECTION 7: SITE INFORMATION (`refer to 780 CMR 111 O for details on each Item) ° .:: „ ter ”, Water Supply: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal: Trench Permit: Debris Removal: Public Check if inside Flood ZoneElMunicipal will not required EDLicensed Disposal Site ED or Identify Zone: Is enclosed ❑ or specify: Railroad right-of-way: Hazards to Air Navigation: MA Historic commission Report Process: Not applicable ❑ Is Structure within airport approach area? Is their review completed? or Constant to Build Enclosed ❑ Yes ❑ NO ❑ Yes ❑ NoAF ❑ SECTION 8: CONTENT;OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Iv ., , r ' - Edition of Code: Use Group(s): Type of Construction: Occupant Load per Floor Does the building contain a sprinkler system?:False Special Stipulations: IM ��, y# t SECTION 9 PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORITATION .Pna i I,' Ott'ttv,y ° - "PERMIT ,.wU, �a � SEl ! ;, s µttiHn'T�„ Commonwealth of Massachusetts n, oP °w City of Salem P „xn> Inspectional Services RECE I PT 120 W ashington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 Phone:(978)745-9595 x5641 FRED&BARNEY'S DEMOLITION If applicable,the property owner hereby authorizes FRED&BARNEY'S DEMOLITION To act on the property owner's behalf,in all matters relative to the work authorized by this building permit application. P -` SECTION 10 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL(Please fill out Appendix 2)niivfy ,;�-„ 'u````� �- ' '� , ;; !. .} '��-. (If bwldmg is less than 35 000 cu ft of enclosed space and/or not-under Construction Control then skip Seaton 10 1) _ 1 Registered Professional Responsible for Construction Control PH P. l r Name Phone Email Registration Number Address Discipline Expiration Date 4 10.2 General Contractor -r If 2 .,. .�.� Company Name License no. and License Type if Applicable Name of Person Responsible for Construction Address: Phone Email Address As244” .a SECTION 11 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT(M.G L c ,152 A Worker's Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of Industrial Accidents must be completed and submitted with this application.Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit. Is a signed Affidavit submitted with this application? ME >',,,.x , w .SECTION-12 CONSTRUCTION COST ANDPERMIT FEE �x Total Estimated Costs(Labor and Materials): $10000.00 Building Permit Fee: $105.00 Enclose check payable to the City of Salem, Ck# w SECTION 13 SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT p k -, LK iG ba°.aa By entering my name below, I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and understanding. Please print and sign name Title Telephone Address: Date: 5/5/2005 Municipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval 'h � , P r*CEO � /2 j �. ` , ,«4, r _ d ' , ia; Nx, -. 'a"w-, r r yt5 UQ5 a ��. , �,�., � , ,�� , ' ,� �� +! amen rf, THIS IS N�T�rA PERMIT., lE, ,`. . Dana Menon From: Kirt Rieder <krieder@hargreaves.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 29, 2014 10:53 PM To: Dana Menon Subject: Chicken &Goodhue St In anticipation of my absence for Thursday, I have the following comments,which you may paraphrase or read as is: Goodhue St While I don't see an email or hardcopy of any ocument related to the discussed request for an insignificant change, my reaction to what you described is as follmwsj planting species along the canal should be modified to select species rcapab a of withstanding short term inundation due to brief flooding. Given the estuarine condition,there are plenty of salt tolerant species that may be planted at this location. Swapping out plant material in favor of rip rap, regardless of the dimension of the stone is a net downgrade, and effectively signals an unwillingness to maintain an appropriate pedestrian landscape. Shifting to inert rip rap results in a coarse environment devoid of much life or infiltration. In my view,the change is not insignificant, and I am not a supporter. Chicken As I expressed at Council Tuesday evening, my view is that setting dimensional setbacks is pivotal for describing quantifiable criteria for all applicants and abutters, prospective property buyers, building and health inspectors. Regardless of what the actual dimension is ultimately set at,the dimension(s) must be coordinated and the same between zoning ordinance and health regulations. A setback is critical to preserving the integrity of an abutter's property. If a coop must be set+10'from an applicant's residence,then that dimension should be at least that large if not larger in relation to an abutter's property line. My preliminary view, subject to adjustment, is that a side yard or rear yard setback of 15' should be a minimum. KIRTRII:DER ,nndral "001 1 'Prior Prior to C Decision Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit North River Canal, LLC 28 Goodhue Street February 20, 2007 North River Canal, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Site Plan Review/Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit On Thursday, December 7, 2006, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing regarding the application of North River Canal, LLC, 282 Bennington Street, Boston, MA under Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit for the property located at 28 Goodhue Street. The proposed project includes the construction of a new four-story mixed-use structure with 6,000 sq. ft. of commercial/retail space on the first floor, and 44 residential condominiums on the upper floors. The public hearing was continued to December 21, 2006, January 4, 2007, January 18, 2007, February 1, 2007 and February 15, 2007. The Public Hearing was closed on February 15, 2007. At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on February 15, 2007, the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor (Power, Collins, Puleo, Moustakis, Hansom, Ready), none (0) opposed, to approve the application as complying with the requirements of Site Plan Review and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permits, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform with the plans entitled, "North River Condominium, 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, MA"prepared by Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc.104 Lowell Street, Peabody, MA dated November 15, 2006, and revised January 13, 2006, including pages C-1 —C-4, C1.0-C1.2, Cs, AAI, A4-A4.Iand A5. 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 3. Project Delays The developer, his successors or assigns shall notify the Department of Planning and Community Development if work on the site ceases for any reason for a period of six (6) months. In this event, the applicant shall be required to appear before the Planning Board and report to the Board the reason(s) why work has ceased at the project and a schedule of when work will begin again at the site, as well as a date of final project completion. If substantial work has not commenced on the site, as deemed by the Board, and such work is not anticipated to begin within two (2) years of the date of the Planning Board's original decision, the applicant shall notify the Board and, prior to the two-year anniversary of the issuance of the permit, shall request an extension of the permit from the Board. Applicant shall provide in such request any and all materials the Board may require to make a determination on the extension request, including but not limited to: studies, reports or new plans, at the applicant's expense, as requested by the Board and deemed necessary by the City Planner. 4. Signage All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a sign permit. 5. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner and the City Electrician for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed by the City Planner,prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. The operation of tools or equipment used in construction or demolition work shall occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5): Construction and Blasting and between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. No work shall take place on Sundays or holidays. The Planning Board will agree to changes in the starting time, at the request of the applicant and if approved by a formal vote of the City Council, as per the ordinance. b. Any blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering, hydraulic blasting, or pile driving shall occur in accordance with Salem Ordinance Section 22-2 (5): Construction and Blasting and be limited to Monday-Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. There shall be no blasting, rock crushing,jack hammering, hydraulic blasting, or pile driving on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. c. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. 2 e. All construction vehicles and equipment shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the site. f. The applicant shall abide by any and all applicable rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. g. All construction vehicles and equipment left overnight at the site must be located completely on the site. h. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the Department of Planning and Community Development, unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police Department. 7. Landscaping a. Any proposed landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Salem Cemetery & Shade Tree Department for the selection of street trees. The selection and placement of street trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Planning & Community Development prior to installation. c. The final landscaping plan shall be approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. Construction Traffic a. All construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within City right of way. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the Department of Planning & Community Development prior to construction. b. A construction traffic management plan and schedule shall be submitted to the Department of Planning& Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. Any roadways, driveways, or sidewalks damaged during construction shall be restored to their original condition by the applicant. d. The applicant shall clean construction vehicles before they exit the construction site, and clean and sweep all streets affected by their construction truck traffic as necessary. 9. Affordable Housing Units a) The Applicant shall place an Affordable Housing Restriction on four(4) housing units in the form of a deed rider approved by the City Planner and registered with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. The affordable housing restrictions are to be in accordance with the eligibility criteria for the Commonwealth Department of Housing and Community Development's Subsidized Housing Inventory for the purpose of ensuring that the four(4) dwelling units will be restricted as affordable housing for households whose annual incomes are eighty percent (80%) or less of Area Median Income ("Low Income Households") with a sales price affordable to Low Income households for a period on ninety(90) years from the date of the original conveyance. 3 . a b) The developer shall prepare a buyer selection plan, for approval by the City Planner,to ensure compliance with affordable housing requirements. The developer is to be responsible for any marketing costs and income verification. 10. Design Review Board I The applicant shall submit final construction plans for review and approval by the Design Review Board (DRB)prior to obtaining a building permit. b. In the final construction plans,the landscaping at the entrance to the building shall be placed four(4) feet from the entrance, as opposed to the ten (10) feet shown on the plan. . c. The applicant shall work with and submit to the City Planner plans for a fence to be a four(4) feet tall, withstand a weight load of at least 1,200 lbs. and shall provide a safe barrier between the canal and the walkway for toddlers and small children. Fnal material samples shall be reviewed and approved by the DRB prior to obtaining a building permitF— e. The treatment of the storefronts should be some form of masonry from the bottom of the storefront windows to the ground. The details of the masonry treatment will be reviewed f� onformance with the intent of the Board's recommendation when the construction drawings are submitted. f. The signage for the building and the site must be approved prior to obtaining a sign permit. 11. Traffic Mitigation he applicant agrees to donate $20,000 to the city of Salem for traffic improvements and/or d study of the area in and around Goodhue, Boston and Bridge Streets for traffic mitigation prior to, the issuance of a building permit. 12. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the applicant, his successors or assigns' expense, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. 13. Salem Health Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Health Department, if applicable. 14. Office of the City Engineer The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer 15. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the office of the Salem Building Commissioner. 16. Office of the Building Commissioner All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 17. Easement for Walkway 4 �fhe applicant shall prepare and file all necessary forms and plans to secure a recreational easement for the use of the walkway by residents of the city of Salem that shall run with the land inF � perpetuity�� 18. Utilities Any utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. All utilities shall be installed underground. 19. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the applicant. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. c. Maintenance of any landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs for a two- year period. d. Maintenance of the walkway, fence and all other items and landscaping within the walkway easement and accessory to the walkway shall be the responsibility of the property owner. The property owner shall maintain this area in good condition and, in the event that any portion of the area falls into disrepair, as deemed by the City Planner, the property owner shall, upon written request of the City Planner, immediately repair, replace or restore the necessary portions of the walkway to ensure both the safety of the use of the walkway for residents, and the aesthetic value of the area. 20. As-built Plans & Street Acce tante Plans plans an treet Acceptance Plans, stamped y a RegisteredProfession Engineer, shall b [s-built bmitted-to the.Department of Planning and Community Development and Departmentof Publiervices prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occu ant for the subdivision and or th cc tante of any streets Jrhe As-Built plans shall e submitted tot e City Engineer in electronic file format suitable fox t Lity's use and approved by the City Engineer, prior`to the issuance of the final Certificate b ccu an for the subdivision-and or the acceptance of an 'streets completed tie card,a blank copy available at the Engineering Department) an a cemficatio igned and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantia ompliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance o e final Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision and or the acce tante of ani streets;as well as LUX subse uent re uirements bv the Cill En meet 21. Violations Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 5 I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Decision shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Walter B Power, III Chairman 6 /moo SS9 ' o4 - `h 2e�licr v ,sem Plate s� Sys aCA— � �- Dana Menon From: Thomas Galvin <tgalvin@lagrassearchitects.com> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:57 PM To: Dana Menon Subject: Planning Board Submittal Attachments: Approval set 2007.pdf; Construction set 2013.pdf; Planning Board Letter Outbuilding 10July.pdf Dana, Attached is my letter to address the revision to the approved drawing regarding the Community Space out building. I have included what I have on file as the final submittal to planning department of January 2007 and the construction documents that have been submitted to the building department. Tom Thomas Galvin, AIA JD. LaGrasse & Associates, Inc. One Elm Square Andover, MA 01810 Tel. 978-470-3675 Fax. 978-470-3670 1 July 10, 2014 Ms. Dana S. Menon Staff Planner, City of Salem Department of Planning and Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem, MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Modification Ms. Menon I am writing to clarify the removal of the out building originally shown on the drawing submitted to the Planning Department for the approval of the project. During the design development phase of the project the outbuilding which was designed as Community room for the dwelling units, was seen as an excessive cost to develop and was omitted from the design of the construction set of documents. To my fault, this was not submitted to the Planning Department because I did not see it having an impact on the character of the building which was reviewed by the Architectural review Board and the Planning board. The single story structure stood at the inside comer of the back of the building away from the public view. The amenity of the Community room was incorporated into the first tloor plan of the constructed building. The area that would have been the outbuilding has been utilized as patio area off the constructed community room and grass area. The original outbuilding would have increased the drainage impact for the roof area constructed.Now the patio and landscape area are pervious with no impact to drainage system. The elimination of the outbuilding structure appears to have a positive impact to overall project and not a negative. I hope the Planning Board views this change as an innocent oversight on my part without any intended indifference toward the Board. I hope the Board allows us to remain on track for completion in the scheduled time and not delay occupancy of the property. I apologize to the Board for not thinking of them when we revised this component of the approved documents Thank you for your time to review this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. Respectfully, y� Thomas Galvin One Elm Square T 978.470.3675 Celebration Blvd 1420 Andover,MA 01810 F 978.470.3670 Celebration,FL 34747 www.lacorassearchitects.com AA26001333 _ c 5 co-4 �4 cnv� w At I ' �_ , 0 � � r I , rv. ,y cy rYM^ rx� n 4 1+ !_tt n• 1 wr �:: �.{T•Y''� a +y {i �n,'��n ..r'O :R ��t-> '�T. _ j u,.r�:•:: ♦?� 'lek�y;�... �' t l Y 1 Y �. G `•Lj}f� 'Spm/ii • � Y �'� M y ) S, } Yom'f�+ t I w1 Y h i1 / w H ryeIF,lot r� . ;.ti ( 1q��'�P Y .��r S! �.� r ♦ :-♦ r :I # i F \•I ��[ •r�. �.w 1��y,��WRj r i .�•'. P -" {'r f, Y Y..� . '. v v , L ,f .1 nil.. y +a5+ •^yrr�f$�,f4d-e ' vpv 65;w, '- '"' i l■ x AT �UO, - s IS, _ata6..'Sb hl�w:fib. .. A�.N:•� {` �. r"^' . It �~ F .�•Ag •��I i,- .� 7 Y y r i 4 v � F , L rk�"n„ AF�A��`¢•iY +r�1 .� •y Y...�..y ��+ � � �. . ��ty�-r r x �. tt j�.,, 'yY+}♦ F trxl�" aiE"v^�'Y. .if�, lb'4+7� 4.,wq,�t �"' . Y p�� • �y 4 �.a r•b Irk + f„ r�� i� M 1',"�. „t a'f�Y� ,,t �x.. �' '-. . 1 �r YT .. T t''1♦ ♦y�« � � �S w A r ` I 1 i4e`$y0 { T 5�', , yN� ~ � "• 5 `"�'� i�'fn� (V .I�� trf.. a. �. � a,. "� + iii y a�,` ♦ * }F �a -.�` 1 s�Y • wiM� ,' 4 x F" ,� r. R s. :i w s ♦.Y F 4 Y] µ - �. .yam - :r�y14. r • r 1+ r i • -yam ..��a�• Tannery Building Post Demolition 2007 -West Elevation C i a . f T� a r BVI♦♦♦' •� � �rw� hL y yy Y �#� tia .�' �i• 71 {{•pGWa A r` a a. n. 9 A2 � r a J rw , ♦'a .. �� .r«..r ��4r I a M t ae • a r Tannery Building Post Demolition 2007 - North Elevation a r " "r #p w ~ • Y 3. F • �w '�^�# - , � •p. yah y. a�� ,• ;.�" _ i9 k it � � • k %� i. > � y. N r l � y�A� S� ; •�'a .etrwt� � �£ M d ... t H -.. ♦ �,. - �i. - +ems. ' x �,...a ' Tannery Building Post Demolition 2007 - EasY Elevation ' ` a a, ipds s , e yyjj , f.. h I� V I�IYI 6! • � � : , 'ted � �� O;HSpI^OL6 L0 W'�wale9 YS an4Poo98Z' � µ � � � eq�USll OLfi LO HW waleS'1S an4Poo�BZ ' ,.r '' .,,Lam' *�„ '.,,,,, •._ � � A;: ,a.A- #� Ilt. } � oo f .iey C A , ? P/l � C"3"!�fa -•'ram dTR � f 5 ' F/.Sfl OL610 NW'waleS lS any000�8Z p ' Wi z^ �7i t e.,pn qL6toF.[ln eleS'�g1SK2n�p BZv T' 77w- , ai�(g�ys" atl�t�Y' ,,�(�y �y ��tJ+7,'�s.. �� „�l �,• '. � /A�'>a '� `1L d�:� 1 '� �� , 4-29-2004 Aharonian structural report submitted, statement that submitted application for demolition permit 6-8-2004 Demo delay waiver application to the Historical Commission 8-13-2004 Partial demo approved by the Historical Commission 10-8-2004 Partial demo permit issued by Building Department 12-30-2004 Entire building still erect U SjcS 29-2005 Partial demo of areas approved by Historical Commission is complete W 5-5-2005 Full demo permit issued by Building Department 11-2005 Demolition of all main buildings complete (brick building still standing) �12-7-2006 Planning Board public hearing starts, development plans submitted showing brick building only L,�,,. � �. r_ ` r + :• Yom.. ^ � ..' � :. r� ��.� '! A Yx`s j,• ��vn ! -` m„� �''�.. •* q��. � f i � y �~ NJfYi�CC'C"�J �' �fiui” `Y `¢� <, r� '.I/ ,ji- r� "'f~ •{�, � . ortCw '. FT .. „+, a eeeTTT z e 1. J� r a+ LV F a Aari ♦ 1 7 F ' - del •�i 4 -T j j * w i y '� .. y • J AL +2j . L•4 f 'fin, -..�.. V � x Fye`{...'e' N` F s : t`✓ �- -�'f. .� rn ,t`F: a _ ;` tip. / {"x�'S•, I *,"T `^;y 't1y "- 'c ` 'aa 1 t ti �� `• - �L � 'a� /• _ ,�.. . , 4M*h ��"�' � �•may dr ow �,y it '�V✓ p +I _ ^. fi ./' a Ak l-; It 4V4 lk 16� f4 Limb- 4 yA, a f L i H \ �yI y T a s- ' P + fan A ♦ r {� y� '� � .. c WRO - INZ mo { {.r., . .:-mss t•�r � ;-iar.�� . _ __ � y ,rL._ �• 'v%. � - f r Y .., -'`.. i d }mow i ca .F � �, � - t ��f� t Y. 6. �� ♦ FI' XX, + y Et r a fors q. R r :: iT r7 t.11ii /t;r94 f # T ftr Air v � G Nil i •IIIg� • • 11 • - • .<i�' r s .��G®b,t Cnane+EtmVn Zt)tl, - - - - - --- --- -F -^-�^ -� � � - -- - - . � _ ___-._.____ _ .. _ , � •, „ - -- . _ ,�� _ - -- --- - - -- -- _ - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ---... ..._�.. - --- - - -- - - - - -- ---- - - ----- -- --. _�....--- -� - -- -. -. . _ _ . __�_. .._. _ . _ . � ___. __. _. . . --� � - --= -----..._. __.,-_�_.._ _-... -� � - -----__ _ ,.. ._ ---- .. � = . LEGEND � : /�� I�� T� '�t.�� : � � � �, . . : . �� _:r , LlGHI` �t " - . SPOT�IGNT •s� - � . ,� ; ; . �� ' . R�QF� €�RAIN ----_R°4,,:---: ` .. . : � , � ��., s�cW� � _ _ � . . �lRE ALARM BOX �� ' !`� R WAALL C { � �Ii �O� �O� ; . • °".� <,�,�pr `:.¢�=�� ;� SCALE: 1 " - 20` �.W�,: ,�, �� ,1�. �� ...� ��, :�s�� e � . , .. ,, . QATE: �eptember �, 2014 TREE {DEC#DUOUS) - ' 1S- HD�E ��-_��:��..¢'� } _ " ' � . !NV=5.40 ' �,�;': � � ` \ �� V G�� Lr/ � U � �'��l 1�ET TREE CONI�EROUS � - '� -� : . � � �� / �'�# _- � � ,,.. PLANT�SH,RUB �' . � ati,H � ��'� ` � ,,'f - - . / � Rl41=9.83 , . ��' #�JV IN=M/A (DR!H 2) / U��Ti ��E � �553 15" HDPE INv=5.33 (OUT) jk� / %' � : .`��N�K T�BE GATE INS?pLIE f� TIDE '' �QT / �� E� a ' • CL�Ai�QUT a�/a e�-°.. NG �� O GATE ,,,, _ ,, . � ptNt �,. �- ' � i , - . a OL • - . R wP�� -� ' '� / INV 5 2 1 9 , � 3 2 � � . � . � �� - ' : . BdL�� . -�' r / (DMH ?) : F _ � / j VQRTECH , „ � ` -r��,.. .. ., - .�, PP ' �-- DMH 2 - �� : ��% j j j "� STOCKADE FENCE � / � `� �F�x,E�� ,- R �=�.s� �`�"� Q '1• � '� R;M s sz�o ' �jr � � _ � Y.Y �.A,.�.L.�1�.1�� .�' � IfiN=R!/A (YGR?ECH) � ,,,�. :3Y':;s . ;:.c : �'i � �-- 'n D1�1H t?" HDPE t.r,:iM. . � � ' ,�- �,,-- "c��"'s � 15" kOPE aNV�5.23 (DMH 3) �' I�IA1=9.81 i�tN=5.57 � '� z � - IR�I�AT��N CONTRQL VAI.uE � �, O �"`'� `�« � �� IhV UT=N/P. (DMH i} -',� r ip� ,�� ,na,. %' � �"s� � DMH (BMH 3) �!�3NiTOR1f�� WEi�L � ':0,'is�ev � � '� R!h1=9F% }y�� , ... .. �,.7 � '- yfT ; ia ry i,s / / � ti�W • - ,"p :-.,, ;=;^i c �: � / z : � �s� ^ _ -�` _ . ."o�vr�o��=-,o' , � { "+'"` fNt'itNEERS t PiAhiNER5 1 �SURY�YdRS - :_� ^rxa}:a `R'`' ,.----'�` ' p 9 j ':.u� , GRS SHUTOFF' � Af�,,��;; �,,;�,; � �'" � H ___---_..-=- `�cc � �� e��` sroc;�n��_ y ; ' � V '�-� t�neE #r {k' �. �� i $9.NORTH MAIN STREET � - �,yift �� 48 � .`- �i )�,� I � li {�'�,'�i -- k,'�-�_�4�� '�� .u�o�'� /' �y�M�$' S�5� ��. h�p ' �c � n f--�.,.. -'s °�' . ,;:...j��x � PE ��' � � �s n U A d� �. � SEJITE �Q� . • APPROX GAS SERVICE --- � � _ ° �`�-"-, s ` �,� ,z "° �'" ,; � m m �� * : �M1- MID[3L�T'ON MA QT9�9 " / VGG 12 f. i� EOL ° _------'` ;'r�,` i ` oe � a�.� - �'NlQN�: (978} 539-�088 APPR�X WAfiER SERVICE _ _ .._.._... _ _ '.:;;["� � � � o�''`' � `�""� �. F.AX; {978? 539-82p0 4, 6 SPACES �;' t . "�e"c'� cy a DMN 3 C6 1 . - : VEftTlCAL GRANITE CURB VGC _ ,.,��}F:`��0.„ � � r ,� 12" H4PE�t,N=5.45 N` R2M HDPE ' �"� - - - . . ar \ ':,c, ` FIR�T FLOQR �F ° � �•o°;ry� /� � � { CB 2 1 DM �pF dct DM 5.59 � 1NV-9.83 � .. ; . _ , - 11.75 � `� '"'-` ! . � 1 SppGE" P,Md=8.41 (�$ } & VORTECH) G � ,� r, �. / �� «*'�t'" / ''.--� � ? �INv 5�91 t5# H(DA+H�2�=5.99 Z ,�"en; _ . . . ��?`e�,��1. SEWER IvIANHOLE � �" �,�f - . .. ,.� , . `�'.�". ^.nc � %f� SIGN 'Nfl rn � � y �s , ' . - - - ' .� +na� ._ _ _,._. _- - - �4�,`'`�` ,y�r. ✓ry' - ., /� <+a , PP.R�*ING"�-, tn � , � � ,� [� �� y '�° , . , i - ( a .°Gi�'~ �^J'� �:: � �°_' y � ' . _ . �� (`i�.r'�.�.rl� �.. �'��•.i� � bRAiN MANHOLE . ' � �- � , k � � � (p} : <` ,.. s,.,N � � W t: ``' v .t.b,, � ~ , �aNf ' �,� ��ti 44`�;.i►Aci�� z�. � • '� �� ---�.�� u: � �x'dEE. �D �; c:c: i WAY" �� L,� - " ��+. �.�0�� a , CfiTC H BAS 1 N � : :'� � � /� ``_..._- � � .. , � . ��"� �, �� _ ` ., t, I � _ .. , - �' � �a��.,,.. � , � �;,�,'�:��: � � \ t � <� � SIGN � =A- _�\ �r�: I � _ �,� � i , �: � � �,�;, - ,'' : �'V : �4 �� a� P`� � I � _ .. . _ ' y ��' °Y",14'��` �� Y % aQ- '� � .n, ? � y , � ,'�.'"� � � . ' . ; , � � � ��_�� A�`,Q4` /J/( `j' l � �� !'AVCM:.MT �� Pl1��L iI VF��IYIA�'I�tV. , � ;. ' » � .. ,'a'��qp �� { _ _ � , .� aa - . . , .. - ;- .,o= f. °`� ��.`' , �-- . DE�D RFF EN : . ... : . .. : . . - ��`+�. .<;�:�' / ,�-�, ,a. i �� (�� ` 800K 222�2 �'A�E 393 � .. - - .. : �` "%; ; J �#�� T �, � � PA��E41EMT � . .. " . .° .°��, �� ; ; PLI�,N REF�RE�vC�S: *,• lac. � :-n:n. � �`�,, � �'1" �� ' SiTE DEV�t�QP�t�NT PERMfT C'L,Af� �NC7iRTN R4�ER �QNC)4MINltJM - �� / �� o �� SALEM, MASSACH�SET�#-5 EX1S�ING ��USN[31�#Q�fS SHEET NC�. C-1• .•�?:u ��n./�� J/ � ny��''e I � '� SCALE: 1 "=20°; [}ATED:� J��tUAR'f 1 � _��t�fl� 'R�V THRU �'EBRCJAR.Y 7 �. .p.' u:'+��i 4S ! �' ��YnS� � > ' a . . � - °` �� / �`�, Q " � 2007; SY �AST�RN LAf�1D SUR1��Y =-A��C7C.; �NC. }_� N � . _,t j� . 'O # . J�l.. � ,�i �i _ � Li , i � '� �zx ` � FA4TMiV7 n DA�H � , _ :. : ; :. ' . " .-'�:��'`' /` { N m �� a" HD?ER�1Mf=°s:92 tRo�=� Pt,.AN �F LAN[) SNEET N�. �f��.1; ' S�:i�1�E:- �°'=�0'; Df�T�D: �/� 3%02 � :-.;; ,.*�, � �; i2- r+oPE +�.rvs=a.o2 tirs; REV THRU .3lJNE 26 ��2; , Ccc V "' �W ' !'� �32` HDPE IhV=5.92 (DMN 4) � r B�' BL� �tp�lPA�IiES• FI�ED =AT �HE L.JJEl� " Y�;:`,n°`r M� � Q � ��' �- a 'I SOUTH REG15TE2Y �F UE�DS A� �'{.ANi, E30C�K� 3�1 PtAN f7. � f� � � 4 �,,� �' C� : ns�� /� / ;, ,�� , � - , _ - '��><` /� ce � � F ��, �1M$s.ae � 12- wQ�E tiR°" �^f' � � '�, N MISC. REFERENCES: . � �o' Pvc ,•='>;r"s /is �4,`' 2� "oP� iN� s�'i9 � .�-�-�- ► �' 7' ti D SITE PLAI�I REVIEW�W�7L�ANC?S AND: F�....CtC�D. HAZARC3 �Sf�'�C1AL f'EF�M9T io- y INV=6.47 FAVFMENT � i �'o�, m INV=5.4t ;*,,�;,r lr� �� CGNCR�E � � � � � v � p �' .�:>° f� ..� � / �� ; i � IfPPEF F�-�Q E � z � ; �9,�, F,� REFE�ENGE: B�OK 26E4fi PAGE, 2�2 � . , : �:�� . . ;,',n /�, w� , � �L�oF �RP�Qox �p ,� I� � � SPECIAL USE PERMIT A.F�R4VAL RE��?�N�E: BUOK 29342 PAGE a,: ., � j o�A,� �acATio�) i { ` �,�- m � � k� , .'. n� �,t' �, s M QQ- •'�}�_ � ��nj ��F'Q�+ ti� ' ,1 HCP 4� SEVY£R ��'-..V � � R;M=9.70 � 5Q� � .. ., � ''•so4. ' � OiY�}��`G� � i`_iSIGN �, Z CONCRc1E � 1 1; lZ 72" N�PE �, �»M_��,�, j� �, q.� � � .i ,•`• `° �,}Q N INV=6,B5 ,� ZOr��NG BOARD OF �PPEALS �E�aSiQ�� R��ERENCE:- �BOaK 271a6 ' ° ��e ��{r�`' - \ � ^4,x , ,,'�'-' . �`, : � � FLdQR CRAlN i a ' . ' . yd r � ,;.�.'� .: .. . � � R�u>>o.ze �, � .�� s� PAGE 44 r •``��`� - � + � s� � � �� - �RECORDED A3 TH� ESSEX ��U�H Q#STR1(:T f2EGlSTRY nF �3EEDS_� � • :•` �4'•' �' � \ 1 H�P � Eo�. F ��,p ; s�c!v Q � ' _ - .�w �� I'�'rsicnr �.`, rcr�c��_ � •oo Nor � t< . � _ �:a'� Q� E'o,,y,5'j(;N �,p�Op� i VGC � ENTER" y CC# � • ��4 _ . _ _ - .'�� ; ° • 'fl '��' P �P �-f \ � � 11 51GN . ' ' • ° z. � r# � O�filN� lq� �y�o �a'Py � � � 't ' " �dM.Ad£RClkt ,,�: �xsr� � f; �F,Q r9 2\ +� ` _ _ - . ' + . aa --� , � ~ �� y FARKkNG _ ; .c'° � �cy - °�' I'pBlTO � � �� CNLY' . . ,.s� � �¢P'aa� �� p 'y,/ � N i � . ~qM c;"' � `QPq A \ StGEtivAtK � CNAMBER , � D ra ��, 5!.!H 3 � ' . . �l,A ,u VEtJT �..'^ _ --°, �n,,, ru,y {fv1DC GAS TRAf'� , � ' _ 'i �',;:d� � �* t _ ,- _' -\ ,� u� t �_--- RIM=10.35 . � . .•;` "<, � . T��`�-:: -' ` ` �; . � ZONlNG DiSTRICT: NORTH RIVER= �AhlAL �E3RR(D�3R {NRCC) 3 � � � � .. � _ �.ss ON? - �3-�u � 80L% \ ' STCCKPQE = . . _ _ -_ QU?LET s � � \ Q +i' CI (N`f= - . ��;..? � � �` FENCE '�'A�ER� ,'`v,.� �, VENT � � � N - .. . � � . � (TYP) ��, # �-(._l� r ;; .�� ` -.-.- DIMENSIdNAL -�ETBACK �F�EQt,JiREi�1ENTS: ` _',>� . � . 1 ��, �--^� (�{-� �,; ., . �,___�___-----==---- 1 . "�° C�a, 1 � . , - , _ ': u`� � G y ❑ iJ E� 'T LJ v.'-=�---�.'""'_ �""�lGN � = m . . •::�,f,> y�' 1 _ • k.�,� I'• ;:,,; -� � �` MINIMUM D�PTH 0� F"RONT �',�RD = Nd�'- Ai'PLt�ABLE � . ` _��' � _�___ _ __� -- � / � ;° *, ''', } � � � MINfMUM Q�P'fiH �3F REAR YA�Z[? � _ � hIQfT �;�PP�.fCABLE , - cinr / - .�. T�r�=-�" '-` AC _ _�y � � s" // `'"" ';' MI�1fMUM W{DTH OF 51DE YAR�}," _.�JO`�_"`A;PP:�.[GABLE �:Jfi' r �/ // � � S�� 4 UN�TS �'��` ' �., ��n � " �.a �s �/ �� _...,.__.__--- �,.,,.�..-.�r' , � 4• N # V" � y' � �. I � ^ � HC� f�, o'�ia�4,a `�� h''� �'� � �SIGN �✓L l . . .� . �' , .--- > ,��} ca � � (PRClPERTY PARTIALLY L1ES `W)TH[N ;THE : . -n a � - Y RI!d=9 +�9 : ,r°;�` �'`\,` � < , � ss ENTRA�l�E CORRIQ�F� �JV�I�I;.�Y DiST�ICT {ECC?D)) , a• Pv� ,Nv= ,� � ' 3 l `-'- n. - - kUTO � n � r a }{4PE ��6 79 , . . \4' r � 7� �. '\`'•, S�'RfNKLER � c� in i 12 . ; :' �. . ��G 4 ��~ ,�, ,.r+, i .l '-�t� � �` C - : ' �s' ��(v a�Yvv �+ 4 � � �.s7 W (�� F,~ �. 1 ' � ,� � � � $iG*i . , } , � � •�� oo � a t'� 4 � Q T`p� -�____----- - i , ��, ��MMERC,AL . � = � : an � � �,��`��, � "'j�y %� �ouN A � . , , ��--- D : . . - • a n° �� v �`y,� 1, f' �" �X' S 1 l � V `' F/ ON�iYV : ` ' - : - °� �°9 � � SlGN � �F��` 1 < ; , � VJ � , � . _ . . � a�� SlGN E� � �COMA�ERCIAL f*.� ¢`•, HCP � '. � X .- . , ; t�''z ,� ._.- �.----'-'- SIGN � '�� PARK1NG � 1 i �c �rt� -. . . •+a`o ~CPAF7KNGIAL pNt7` `b�� i �4p� � L,.r �i�}�ECJ: , „ � •�>Ob �l � � �'{�, 7yr i'+� i I 2 N . i . P � 6 !Z'�� : / �¢Y�.i� '. `°�.� -. ai j � � (J R. w . - � � . . " . ' . ,� � o° � � �� ° � ; ,�4� � ��:��''�'�.�ti. �' 1. DATUM FOR BENCHA�ARK iNFOR�AA7�flN iS ; �i.G;�/.D. tJF 19�9. '�.: °� c QQ � � � � � ; � a ro '*,,, ,,ti,,ti, ;�.,n, . �, .. , HCP ' - : ; . .' �c � , 7YPi,� .J N �i ` � �---"'"__ SIGN y_-• Qq ! � ��,,,�, +�"`�.,`b / ....�� ,^ �'R , N t�, 2. EASEMENTS A�ID AGR��MENTS ��ffl7ED` 0�� DE�b 4R APPROVA�S D�CI5iQNS I�RE '� ^z �p 80L � �� HCi� � � �`+� ,' �� `�` INV=$.YO iAPPRC�X. . . � S�� CI� ' ' .. . ' :. � _�.-_--a- - N0� SNOWN ON T�1l5 PLAN. 4 SIGN'-"'� 4 � C FF� LO"'RTEJN) FROVIDED y; isD �_J-' -�: t(:.'i- ' ' rf '� ��' i ' 80L � i� f� � x ¢ � 11 .75 � F3Y C4NTRACT�R �. �', `, - - ,..' '; , � ' � � g (,�.r. � " „ r� � ,; � , � '�;. �,Ra , '�,� a��s _ � � � � � � � � � � 3. FGUNflAT10N Lt�CAT{�N BY AGTUAL :1NSTRFJtvIENT �RCIUNa SUt�VEY .BY WIL�.IAMS a __""�' - -- � _�� ` , � � � . \ �� - �.� - � �- �, � � � & SPARAGES LL� 0�1 MA`( 2� � 1 . �� f _ - - _ _� :_ - - _ �, � ��' -'� ' ' � 3 sroP � ,,.11� j � _ .�,� „ '. .. � �!o .�,�j . . . �-�. i N c� i �-�_,�--w sk', �::�,�- �- - ��4 __ 'PAvER5��, �_ - __ �/� ; S G 3 '-* � w �� - �1 _ �.: ;-��, = _ __ - _ � ,; �..�.----' = � � s'u-� ; . _ L :r';;.� '�� .---�" 4. F�S SU1LT 1�t�C1RMAT10N SWOWN�Ct3MPiL�D :F' OM N ACTU , s,o�sv � � � � ' f, `�.�t; :y�; -;=;��,,,�. � __�-�=-=K -- _ :Jz: _ �..:.,i:.:::. �� • ..-,-.---- _� A AL �I�LD _�tJRV�Y 8Y ' 1 . .. - - ! . - ''-,-�.., , , , . � � _ �-� � � � .. . ... .. . �,� � , � .,, ,._ a:': � , cx �;ti��-.,r�_.r;: ' _ _ --- .�nue�s _ � ,=.`� �' s�. , � � � �_-�---'""-� WILLiAMS & SPARAGES IN G - , � �. � �rt� _ - -- �; � �_ -; - s�+ � . �r�-, � �l AU U5T :20� �; �i� bF SAi�EM WATER & SEWER TIE cn . . , As,. _ : � . �' , �s �p�.K r �, - - - - ��_ � _ 0 4:� � i .E, ir Z.0 . �.f r ,` � � r' „ n;"i,`i'il .^. 1 � '.' __ ___ �-- � T '- ., � - , .;...._,. � � r:.�..�€.��..,a,, t� AVERS=;�L,,. �.;� •� aa.,.„�PAV�RS�;:=';;;'`, ';t'.l';'„ - �"k __�.. ` � r f, , ' CARDS, AN� li�FOR�vIATlQN FROVID�D B'Y . TN� C�NTRAC�'OR. `� ^-' S70P� n.�± � � t:";' X `� F,-:; :. � t , r !� , , p , t ,_ _ , �l�;�e ' �,'�y1 4„ _ £� �` ` �i �` � 552 . . . V...'� , ;- - `/ - . . � T% - � .��.._ ��_ :� � �.,r � � �� .. � f � , � UNE � =: r ,..;' �'� _ Sl �',�i €� -- ;�_ � � cf`� - Slr'cWAIK a �;� W/UG � ' J � / lfP �P \\`��--- ... �� A s s,�, � � €� €� �� _ �, ,� � j �ry � � 5. TOTAL PARKING _ SPACES: 1 16 �IN�l.t1C1E5 � 7 � HANQICAP SPAC�S " 1 - _-------`�"�----` STCE . .. , � ! � � zV,� � %i554-80 �554! ' SlpEN�Al.K 1 �,'�r I.ItiE L�pTlO� } �T �G. � & GUY �w/G ��v� . , � SICCVdALK �F � �C �EXR�IN�A��„ SE`A'ER ., " . . � J " � vi � r"wN553._.__------ � � SMH 2 , STG? S GN -_ , . : t � � VGC � cn�O RIM-17.22 NO IEFT �URN , .. . �. � ., r � y �� INv�4.32 � SPACES _ '"� ,� �� c� iN� 5�R BR!CK SEW€R . . ,.. : : j EXi� F itOr1 � � � � j � ' pP?ROxtMATE LOCp+ 1� . % � + 5 SaA�ES EXlSTtNG 5EWER UNE � SMtt t �-� i l � � � � .�,� . � ��' � - ' � i . ( ' t .µ� � R!M�t�J.74 ; -..._.,.,,� i 'N� B" INV=4.09 (SMH 2) �.�.-�-^' : . �� F� ET ,Nv_2_�4 s�� o z�� - ��OQHUE ST E . - . D�PT. OF PI-.Ah`"l;NG & , . COMMl1t�i7Y DEVELOP!�AGhT � AFF XfA� c l CA fGN Qf EXiSTitvG 8" WATER MAIN - - ; . .. . . -i ' . .. , . - . :. - i ; . . - . :� . . � .�_, . . ,.� ,.. , ..-. i � I -- I -- L z� g 1y_y' •vim <-nA- L SERAFINI, SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR, TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI. JR. 978-744-0212 JOHN E. DARLING 781-581-2743 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI TELECOPIER 978-741-4683 April 29, 2004 VIA HAND DELIVERY Denise M. McClure, Assistant APR z 9 2004 City Planner Salem Planning Department DEPT OFPEI" 120 Washington Street, 3 rd Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mrs. McClure: This office represents North River Canal LLC, owner of the property located at 28 Goodhue Street. The owners purchased the property a few months ago and have commissioned both architectural and engineering studies of the buildings to determine their suitability for rehabilitation. Enclosed please find the reports of Aharonian & Associates, Inc. , the architect, and C.A. Pretzer Associates, Inc. , the structural engineer, concerning the buildings on the site. The recommendations of each report are that the existing buildings be demolished due to their extremely poor and som@times hazardous condition. Based on these reports, the owner has filed for a demolition permit with the Building Inspector's office, and understands the necessity of going to the Historical Commission for a demolition delay waiver. The purpose of filing the application was to start the clock on the potential six-month delay. The owners and the architect have ideas for the re-use of this property; however, they want to be respectful of the current rezoning process that is ongoing for the neighborhood. Therefore, once you have had the opportunity to review these reports and speak with the committee, would you please contact me so that we may April 29, 2004 Page Two schedule a meeting with everyone involved. The new owners are prepared to make a significant investment and improvements to this site. I look forward to hearing from you. jJs cerely, e h C. Correnti JCC:dl Enclosure cc: Thomas M. St. Pierre, Building Inspector North River Canal LLC Aharonian 6 Associates,Inc. 6 Blackstone Valley Place,Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 PROJECT a NAA .A, �s".� �ws tri.� a t `y n s t •` a d qyo i � ' a. Y ts's. a'� PROPOSED MIXED )SE ©EUELOPMENT� .� ATfiTHE,NORTH=RIDER CANAL " ""�� , r REPORT�on�the'ARCHITE£TI�RE a�►d PHYSICAE ��11��ITI�,N of�x�e�Y�� 5�s .�Z � � �^�� X��'� �`+ Y"�S`�5� E��T�� N•�� k S�1,it � .4 ?mak kk '��' � i�id REPORT DATE: 4/14/04 3/24/04 10:00 AM Sunny +/- 45 degrees 1= Tom Grafe, PE - C A Pretzer Associates Inc. Mark Humphrys, RA - Aharonian & Associates Inc. JNTRODUCT(�N't: kw"x� w?,i.• ,��'`.�.. ..;,y°+ �d � , `4!ha : �ck � 6 . :. Aharonian & Associates Inc. (Architect) and C. A. Pretzer Associates (Structural Engineer) conducted an inspection of the main building to assess its Architectural value and present structural condition. The subject parcel of land is approximately 1.6 acres in area and has 2 existing structures on it. The main building is a 4 story structure with a footprint of approximately 32,500 square feet and is • currently unoccupied. The secondary building is a 1 story structure that had a footprint of approximately 8,200 square feet until a recent fire reduced that area to approximately 5,000 square feet. This building is currently occupied by a small automotive repair shop. The following are our findings from the visual inspection of the main building. The Structural Report is attached to the end of this report. , �OBSFRVAzIONS `. d� -:,..,.. ¢.:i. .. a "--•, ,, ._ 1) The main building is a typical flat roof mill style structure with an " L " shaped configuration and a 1 story boiler building appendage located at the internal corner of the "L" . The majority of the building is 4 stories in height but there is also a 2 story and a 1 story section located to the south and a 1 story section located to the northwest. These lower sections appear to have been additions that were made to the main " L " shaped building over the years. The main building is wood frame construction with metal clapboard siding or transite shingle siding and a punched wood window pattern. The 1 story boiler building is brick construction with large linteled door openings and a few small arched windows. There is a chimney attached, consisting of a brick base and a tall metal stack. The 2.story section is CMU construction with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier to pier. The southern 1 story section is precast concrete construction, also with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier to pier. The 1 story section to the northwest is CMU construction, again, with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier to pier. See Photos 1 — 3, 5 — 8, 11 & 14. 2) While the basic building design and the subsequent additions are fairly typical of period mill buildings, they unfortunately have none of the wonderful architectural detailing also typical for those buildings of that period. There are no ornamental cornices, detailed window and door trim, water tables, cornerboards or other similar detailing typical of period mill building architecture. The brick boiler building does have stone lintels and brick arches at the door and window openings, however, Page I of 3 r Ahamnian 6 Associates,Inc.6 Blackstone Valley Place,Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 the detailing stops there. There is no differentiation in the brick coursing, quoins, corbelling, cornices or other similar brick detailing of the period. See Photos 1 - 3, 5 - 8, 11 & 14. • 3) The lack of any historical architectural significance aside, the overall physical condition of this structure is a major concern. The building is racked in several locations and appears to have significant structural and settlement issues. The exterior envelope of the main building and its additions are dilapidated and beyond repair. The metal siding is severely rusted, the transite shingles are falling off in several locations and the exterior walls are bulging at many locations due to the racking of the building structure. The CMU and precast concrete walls have major structural cracks and the built-up tar and gravel roofs are no longer viable systems. The brickwork is in very poor condition. The mortar joints are severely deteriorated, bricks have been displaced and have fallen out as have the brick arches over the windows. The windows are in poor condition or have failed completely as viable systems. See Photos 1 - 10,12, 13,15 & 16. 4) The interior of the building is in a similar state of disrepair. The structure and walls have sagged and settled. The concrete floor slabs and wood floors have heaved and settled. The wood stairways also have the same problems. Because the building envelope has deteriorated, there is a significant amount of water damage to both the building structure and its interior components. See Photos 17 - 38. 5) The existing heating, plumbing and electrical systems are outdated or have been cannibalized to the extent that they are no longer viable systems. The sprinkler main assembly has a few new components that are probably salvageable, such as the backflow preventors, but the distribution piping and sprinkler heads are old and the pipe sizes and head spacing pattern would not be appropriate for the proposed use. 6) Although a full code review has not been performed, it is readily apparent from this inspection that the building is also in gross violation of the current State Building, Fire, Life Safety • and Handicapped Accessibility Codes. Besides the obvious structural deficiencies which are addressed in the Structural section of this report, violations also include inadequate egress facilities, non-fire rated stairways and egress corridors, no fire separation assemblies between tenants and different use groups, inadequate finish material classifications for fire resistance requirements, inaccessible spaces and building systems (ADA) and generally hazardous conditions, just to list a very few. 7) See the attached Structural Report prepared by C. A. Pretzer Associates Inc. for more specific and detailed observations relative to the structural integrity of this building. Based on the above observations and those contained in the attached Structural Report, we offer the following recommendations: 1) There is no section or element of the existing building that has any Architectural significance to the project or the community at large that would dictate that the entire building or any portion of the building be salvaged for adaptive reuse. 2) Given the overall deteriorated condition of the building's envelope, structural systems, mechanical and electrical systems, the extensive Code violations and the concern over building settlement issues, salvaging the building or any portion of the building for adaptive reuse would not be feasible nor practicable, either physically or financially. 3) Since it appears there are significant building settlement issues that need to be addressed, a • Geotechnical investigation should be performed to determine the viability of the soils relative to Report on the Architecture and Physical Condition of the Existing Building Page 2 of 3 Aharonian 8 Associates,Inc.6 Blackstone Valley Place,Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 bearing capacity, water table elevation and similar related issues to ensure that that proposed project could be properly constructed on this site. 4) Therefore, we recommend that the entire existing building be demolished down to the existing foundation level and the proposed Mixed Use Development be built on top of the existing foundation footprint, assuming that the foundations and soil characteristics are suitable to accommodate this scope of work. { - t sr a 7 ,#� �StR t�� `b! REPOPTI&N ' Mark Humphrys RAl �,. , t^Yex ,s1M <�,Pro e T htteCt>E .�.y t,.,..`, " §'^„',«.:i: r'.r'.Sx,.t. »:,,. d '..�. k F • • Report on the Architecture and Physical Condition of the Existing Building Page 3 of 3 ASS p t C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. 50 Freeway Drive,Cranston, R102920 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS C.ANDREW PRETZER, PHD., P.E. • _ J DESIGN,CONSULTATION,INVESTIGATION MICHAEL).GRAFE, P.E. (401)785-2690 FAX(401)461-9360 THOMAS P.GRAFE, P.E. DAVID GRANDPRE, P.E. H •�ST. 1�^ • ef7ldil: fndll�CdPretZeLCOffI PETER W.GRAFE North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA File No. 204402.20 Structural Report/April 13, 2004 On March 24, 2004, Mr. Mark Humphrys from Aharonian & Associates, Inc., Architects, and I visited the referenced site. The purpose of our visit was to determine the condition of the building structure. This report will summarize our findings, as well as comment on the suitability of the building for reuse. Attachment 1 contains photos I took during our visit. GENERAL BUILDING DESCRIPTION The main part of the building is a four-story, wood-framed, "L"-shaped structure. The longer leg of the "L" runs east to west between the street on the west and the canal on the east. The shorter leg runs north, roughly parallel to the street. The columns and floor beams are constructed with heavy timber and the floors with tongue and groove wood plank. The walls are constructed with wood studs and wood sheathing and are generally sided with shingles and strip windows. See photos 1 through 16 for views of the entire building exterior. To the south of the longer leg of the main building is a two-story, steel-framed structure with masonry exterior walls and wood floor joists spanning between steel beams and columns. At the southwest comer of the main building is a one-story, cast-in-place concrete structure. There is another one-story structure with masonry exterior walls that runs along the east side of the shorter leg of the main building. Finally, there is a one-story brick structure with a wood- framed roof that extends out from the north side of the longer leg of the main building. BUILDING CONDITION Main Four-Story Structure The condition of the structure of the main four-story, "L"-shaped section of the building is poor. This is mainly because of problems related to settlement of the underlying soil. The first floor slab has cracked and settled throughout the building, in some places in excess of 1 foot, (see photo 17). Sections of the exterior foundation walls have cracked and settled to a lesser degree, (see photo 4). As a result, the upper floors are uneven and tilted. There are locations, especially on the upper floors, where water infiltration has caused deterioration of some of the structural wood members, (see photos 18 and 19). The entire shorter leg of the main building is racked as much as 1 foot out of plumb at the north • end, again, due to differential settlement of the foundation from one side of the building to the # other. The interior main columns are tilted, and the joints between the main framing members have opened up to accommodate the racking, (see photos 21, 22, and 23). The upper floors of the shorter leg are severely out of level, (see photos 24 and 25). Water infiltration has caused a roof beam and section of roof and fourth floor planking to rot and sag, (see photos 26 and 27). C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal • Mill Building April 13, 2004 Page 2 The first floor of the shorter leg of the main building was covered with steel plates in some areas in an attempt to level the concrete floor. Water from the sprinkler main in the same location has caused the base of some of the wood columns to rot, (see photo 28). Two-Story Steel-Framed Structure The condition of the structure of the two-story section of the building is poor. The first floor slab is cracked and pitched due to settlement of the underlying soil of nearly 2 feet. A section of the first floor slab was cut away to reveal another slab 14 inches below. The lower slab had been filled over to accommodate settlement, and the newer slab continues to settle, (see photo 29). The tops of the main center steel columns have been shimmed about 10 inches. Even so, they have settled an additional foot, causing the second floor and roof structure to be severely out of level, (see photos 30, 31, and 32). Rusting reinforcing steel has caused all of the exterior concrete lintels to crack, and in some cases, fail, (see photo 9). There are numerous cracks in the masonry blocks, especially near the roof line, (see photo 33). • One-Story Concrete Structure The structure of the one-story, cast-in-place concrete section of the building is in poor condition. There are numerous exposed and rusted reinforcing bars on the exterior where concrete has spalled off, (see photos 11, 12, and 13). Settlement and cracking of the floor make it difficult to walk in the building without tripping. The roof structure along the west side has slid an inch or so to the east and is hardly bearing on the west wall, (see photo 34). One-Story Masonry Structure The exterior walls of the one-story section of the building along the east side of the short leg of the main section have numerous open cracks, (see photo 36). The roof has sagged. I expect the roof was not designed to support snowdrift from the adjacent four-story main building section. One-Story Brick Structure The one-story brick structure is in very poor condition. Mortar joints have deteriorated to the point that bricks have started to fall to the ground, (see photos 15 and 16). The wood roof framing members are severely rotted. The center of the roof has been shored up with steel posts and a beam to prevent it from collapsing, (see photos 37 and 38). • C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. • North River Canal Mill Building April 13, 2004 Page 3 SUMMARY All sections of the building structure have been significantly affected by settlement of the underlying soil, and to a lesser degree by wear and tear and water infiltration. Even the best portions of the building are out of plumb and in poor condition. It is my professional opinion that none of the building structure is suitable for rehabilitation and reuse. It would be my recommendation to remove the building super-structure in its entirety. Reuse of the existing foundation or even a new foundation should be considered only after a geotechnical investigation of the underlying soil is performed. C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas P. Grafe, P. . • Vice President Enc.(1): Attachment 1 —Photos taken March 24, 2004, by TPG • i C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal Mill Building April 13, 2004 Attachment 1 —Photos taken March 24, 2004, by TPG • i I • � .. - p, �o9d ti 1' ' 4 19 1 -_ - �_ Xvi �<< 5r ��e4 4 . 0�'� North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • , u :, i - 1 , CAPA 204402.20 4 3Photo 4 Open foundation crack at southeast corner of building 51 -I4 shown in photo 3. a 4 P • X� J , Photo 5 �— East elevation of the shorter MI F ® © _ leg of the main building section. l E North�(� - Mill Building Salem, MA. 8 f P9� 3 . g �_� 204402.20 3 I i i'• I 4'Nyy� • di o f �^, i 1 1 1 1 of 1 1 1! •�*,j 1 1 1 1 • 1 Q I •I ��"�i 1. 1 • I I I �� X -•1 1 1 art , �'. - • wap .a1' � •.ir'vaz•.z� Lia « 1a..x'31-4 :. r North iver Canal Building Salem, _ x _ CATA 204402.20 fk` C r ti:Yry ` 1 r ti lu�a's . ran • • . . - �' � �''. _cls {��:e� — • • • • 77 MOO .i - y, North River Canal 3� .. Mill Building Salem, MA • _ - �� " "_ CAPA 204402.20 x tt` IPhoto 12 • i t � k f Cracked and spalled concrete ) on exterior of building , # r section shown in photo 11. ,1. tiM-1 ..._•CZ +•• �.,y - ' :� till. - Y Photo 13 a - Open crack and bowed wall of building section shown in _ < photo 11. mss: Ec _ Photo 14 _ a3 One-story brick building. t : J,r l^ North River Canal Mill Building f Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 15 Cracks and missing bricks on exterior of one-story brick building. ,G Photo 16 Cracks and missing bricks on exterior arch of one-story brick building. 3 Y fHh - y Photo 17 j Cracked and severely settled concrete slab on first floor in main section of the building. a { r .1 ti fi � ll a y A V if 6 � e y �I 1 North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA — CAPA 204402.20 � y Photo 20 Tilted first floor column in shorter leg of main building p section,due to racking of the } building. r I .A :k � y AG �' 'i' Photo 2 _ Separation of beam hanger due to racking of shorter leg of main building section. �y o- North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 22 Separation of joints in the 1 wood framing due to rack- j` ing of shorter leg of main c � building section. y 5 t Mal J � ' Y Photo 23 " Racking of shorter leg of main building section has nearly pulled the floor beam off the supporting column. y f _ '"+fix i fie 4 k Y dy North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 4� Photo 24 ri Sagging second floor in shorter leg of main building section. 7 . w e k Photo 25 r r Sagging second floor in I shorter leg of main building section. • North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA . CAPA 204402.20 Photo 26 Rotted section of roof beam and plank in shorter leg of �a main building section. i i i.' • �' Photo 27 Close-up view of rotted roof beam and plank shown in photo 26. a ` North River Canal '1 Mill Building - Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 Photo 28 Base of first floor column rotted by water from sprinkler main in shorter leg of main building section. r; Photo 2 Qp Settled slab-on-grade in the two-story building section. Note original slab had settled ^� before it was covered with crushed stone and a second slab placed. -K� J Photo 30 i ) 9 inches of shims on top of - ` — the first floor column in the c - two-story building section. i d' k North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 e - Photo 31 Sagging roof steel in two- story building section, where the center columns have settled. f`h is 1• tPhoto 32 Steel connections have - pulled apart at center a t columns shown in photo 31. F �i 4 North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 33 Large open cracks in the wall of the two-story building. 9 h R C " y Photo 34 AA 4 a' Roof slab has nearly pulled } off the support column in the V ; one-story concrete section of the building. qy _ P Sir I � 1 40 } ,,t North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 Photo 35 Severely settled slab in the one-story concrete section of the building. � tl r r ! Photo 36 +' 4: Cracks in the exterior masonry walls of the one- +► ' � story building section on the east side of the smaller leg of the main building section. �P' North River Canal Mill Building i Salem, MA . . 204402.20 F F / 1 Photo 37 l � _ Severely rotted wood roof framing in the one-story brick building section. j e F � t, Photo \\\ roof framing in the one-story brickbuilding section, \ \ by RT Group, Inc Engineered from the Ground Up"" February 1, 2005 Mr. Anthony Roberto North River Canal, LLC 282 Bennington Street East Boston, MA 02128 RE: Phase II Geotechnical Engineering Services 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA FEC/RTG Project Nos. 04011.00/04114.01 Dear Anthony: In accordance with our Engineering Services Proposal dated November 30, 2004, we have evaluated the existing building foundation system at 28 Goodhue Street. Our Phase II work included three (3) days of test pit excavations to determine if the existing foundation system is pile supported. We also completed analyses to determine whether or not it will be possible to utilize the existing foundation and/or "underpin" it to n support the proposed building loads. Further, we evaluated a new pile foundation system to support the proposed building loads. Budget-Level construction cost estimates have been prepared for each alternative investigated. Based on the test pits completed, we have determined that the interior columns and " perimeter walls of the subject building are supported on timber piles, and that these piles range from about 10'-0" to 16'-8" in length. Although the piles are in good condition and no decay or rot was observed, they are considerer too short to support the proposed building based on estimated building loads and the subsurface conditions encountered. T SD 0 Summarized below is a discussion of the Phase II Investigation results, alternatives and estimated construction costs to support the existing/proposed building, and conclusions and recommendations. N Phase II Investigation Results A A Four (4) Phase II test pits (TP-1 through TP-4) were completed between December 13 A and 14, 2004 (Figure 1). One (1) additional test pit (TP-5) was completed on December 22, 2004 (Figure 1). The test pits were completed using a track mounted excavator by 0 Fred and Barney Demolition of Danvers, MA. When timber piles were encountered, a nylon sling was attached to the butt of a selected pile and the pile was extracted using g the excavator by pulling it out of the ground. The pile diameter and length were w measured following extraction. N A summary of the conditions encountered during test pit excavation is presented in Table 1. A total of three (3) interior and two (2) exterior test pits were completed across the site (Figure 1). It is assumed that the conditions encountered at these locations are representative of the conditions that will be encountered beneath the s J��]�� 3 Geotechnical Waterfront Structural Civil Geo-Environmental E/ Mr. Anthony Roberto 2 February 1, 2005 proposed building, and schematic figures highlighting the conditions encountered are presented in Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Because a crawls ace was encountered during ng excavation at Test Pit No. 3 no additional exploratory work was completed at this location, and it was not possible to prepare a schematic figure of the conditions encountered at this location. Photographs at Test Pit No. 3, as well as the conditions encountered at the other test pit locations, are provided in Appendix A. Table 1 Test Pit Summary 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Test Pit No. Timber Pile Butt Timber Pile Tip Timber Pile Diameter (in) Diameter (in) Length (ft) Comments Interior Column 1 8.5 to 10.0 6.0 12.0 Location, 4 timber piles per Column Exterior 2 8.5 to 10.0 7.5 10.0 Column/Wall, 2 timber piles per Column Exterior Column/Wall, 3 Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Crawl Space Discovered, Stop Work Groundwater Infiltrated into 4 Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Test Pit, But Timber Piles Observed =lnteriorColumn5 8.5 to 10.0 6.0 16.67 Pile Capacity Analyses Static pile capacity analyses were completed to estimate the individual and group capacity of the timber piles at each of the above test pit locations. Based on the preliminary analyses completed (Appendix B), the ultimate capacity of the timber piles at the interior column locations (e.g., TP-1 and TP-5) is estimated to range from about 7 to 8 tons per pile. The ultimate capacity of the timber piles at the exterior column locations (e.g., TP-2 and TP-4) is estimated to be about 6 tons per pile. Mr. Anthony Roberto 3 February 1, 2005 There are a total of four (4) piles at each interior column location and up to two (2) piles spaced about 8 feet on center along the exterior of the existing building. The ultimate group capacity at the interior column locations is estimated to range from about 28 to 32 tons, and the ultimate group capacity at the exterior column locations is estimated to be about 12 tons. Based on the framing plans provided, and what are considered to be reasonable dead and live loads (Table 2), the total estimated load at the interior column locations is about 79 tons, and the total estimated load at the exterior column locations is about 25 tons. Based on this, the estimated Factor of Safety (FOS) of the interior column pile groups is about 0.40. The estimated FOS of the exterior piles is about 0.60. The minimum recommended FOS for pile design is 2.0, and the existing foundation system is not adequate to support the proposed building loads. Table 2 Assumed Dead and Live Loads Acting on Proposed Building 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Location Estimated Dead Load (PSF) Estimated Live Load (PSF) 15 Floor 80 100 2" Floor 20-25 50 3rd Floor 20-25 50 4 Floor 20-25 50 Roof 20-25 30 Down-drag effects were also considered due to the consolidation/settlement of the underlying peat layer (Figures 2 through 5) and the subsequent settlement of the fill layer above it. This settlement has and will continue to occur due to long-term secondary compression of the peat. Down-drag effects will increase the total load on each pile and reduce its effective capacity. Based on the preliminary analyses completed, the FOS of the interior column pile groups is estimated to be about 0.20 to 0.30. The estimated FOS for the exterior column piles is about 0.30. The minimum FOS with respect to down-drag for design is 1.0 and the existing foundation system is not adequate to support the proposed building loads. 1 Dead and Live Loads provided by C.A. Pretzer Associates and assume first floor commercial loading and residential loading above. 2 The estimated Dead Load (DL) does not include the weight from a possible concrete overlay on the 2nd 3rd and 4`h floors, which may be required to level the floors. If this is required, it will increase the DL, which will further reduce the factor of safety (FOS) on the piles. Mr. Anthony Roberto 4 February 1, 2005 Remedial Alternatives The preliminary analyses completed indicate that additional vertical capacity must be provided at the interior column locations to provide a minimum FOS of 2.0 with respect to pile capacity (and a minimum FOS of 1.0 with respect to down-drag). This is also true at the exterior column locations. If the existing foundation system is to be used to support the proposed building, this will require that the interior and exterior columns be underpinned using some type of deep foundation system. Screening of Alternatives A summary of alternatives that were considered to underpin the existing building are presented in Table 3. Of the four (4) alternatives_considered, two (2) alternatives were carried forward for a detailed evaluation. These alternatives included (1) Resistance Piers and (2) Drilled Mini-Piles. Table 3 Screening of Alternatives 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Remedial Alternative Installation Comments Equipment/Method Low-Clearance Auger Rig, Not Considered Suitable for Auger Cast Concrete Pile Concrete Placed as Augers Site Soils, Vibrations During Withdrawn Installation a Concern Fork-Lift Mounted Impact Multiple Butt Welds Driven H-Pile Hammer, Short Sections of Required (time and H-Pile Driven and Butt money), Vibrations During Welded Together Driving a Concern Commonly Used to Resistance Pier Hydraulically Installed Pipe Underpin Damaged Pile Buildings, Little to No Vibration Low-Clearance Drill Rig, Short Sections of Pipe Pile Commonly Used to Drilled Mini-Pile Screwed Together and Filled Underpin Damaged with Concrete Buildings, Minimal Vibration Each of these alternatives is discussed in more detail below. Resistance Piers Resistance Piers are small diameter steel pipe piles (about 4 inches in diameter) that are "pushed" to the desired bearing depth using hydraulic equipment. A steel support bracket is bolted to the exterior of the building (in this case the interior and/or exterior pile caps) and short sections of pipe pile are inserted at the bracket and hydraulically pushed into the underlying soil. Once the first section of pile has been installed, Mr. Anthony Roberto 5 February 1, 2005 another section of pile is attached (by screwing the sections together), and the process is repeated until the desired resistance is attained. To adequately support the proposed building, it is estimated that a total of ten (10) Resistance Piers would need to be installed at each interior column location. A total of four (4) Resistance Pier would need to be installed at each exterior column location. Assuming that about fourteen (14) interior columns would remain, a total of 140 Resistance Piers would be needed to underpin the interior columns. Assuming that about 222 linear feet of building would remain, a total of 264 Resistance Piers would be needed to underpin the exterior of the building (includes the sides and ends of the building). Prior to installing the Resistance Piers, the structural floor slab of the building would be saw-cut into pieces and removed. The asphalt pavement and concrete floor slab on the exterior of the building would also be saw-cut and removed. After the floor slabs/pavement had been removed, a trench would be excavated around the interior columns and around the exterior of the building. The trench would need to be about 4 feet wide and 4 feet deep to provide adequate clearance for installing the Resistance Piers. After the trenches were excavated, steel brackets would be attached to the interior and exterior columns, and the Resistance Piers would be hydraulically installed. Upon completion, the excavated trenches would be backfilled with onsite excavated material and a new structural floor slab poured (new reinforcing steel would need to be drilled and grouted into position at the interior and exterior pile cap locations). Based on the preliminary analyses completed, the Resistance Piers would be about 70- feet-long and would terminate in the Silty/Sand stratum located below the Fill and Peat layers. The final length would be determined during final design, and additional and deeper soil borings could be required to finalize the Resistance Pier lengths. One caveat associated with this system is the potential to encounter obstructions in the Fill layer above the Peat. Obstructions could result in significant cost and schedule impacts. Drilled Mini-Piles The drilled Mini-Piles would be similar to the Resistance Piers, except that they would be drilled into position. The Mini-Piles would consist of small diameter steel pipe piles (about 8 inches in diameter) that would be advanced in short sections (that are screwed together) using a low-clearance drill rig. Reinforcing steel would be inserted into the upper portion of the installed pipe after drilling to the desired bearing depth, and the open pipe pile filled with concrete. The reinforcing steel at the top of the drilled Mini- Pile would be connected to the columns and the entire upper assembly cast into the structural floor slab. To adequately support the proposed building, it is estimated that a total of six (6) Drilled Mini-Piles would need to be installed at each interior column location. A total of two (2) drilled Mini-Pile would need to be installed at each exterior column location. Mr. Anthony Roberto 6 February 1, 2005 (Rev 01, 02/21/2005) Assuming that about fourteen (14) interior columns would remain, a total of 84 drilled Mini-Piles would be needed to underpin the interior columns. Assuming that about 222 Linear feet of building would remain, a total of 132 drilled Mini-Piles would be needed to underpin the exterior of the building (includes the sides and ends of the building). The drilled Mini-Piles would be about 35- to 45-feet-long and would terminate in the Silty/Sand stratum located below the Fill and Peat layers. The final length would be determined during final design, and additional and deeper soil borings could be required to finalize the Resistance Pier lengths. The Mini-Pile system would not be significantly affected by obstructions in the fill layer above the Peat. Estimated Construction Costs The estimated quantities and unit cost breakdowns for the Resistance Pier and Drilled Mini-Pile Alternatives are provided in Appendix C (Tables C-1 and C-2). For comparison, a quantity and unit cost breakdown was also prepared to install a completely new pile foundation system to support the proposed building, assuming that the existing building and its foundation were demolished and removed (Table C-3). It was assumed that this new foundation system would be supported by 30- to 45-foot-long 12-inch diameter CCA treated timber piles (lengths to be verified during Final Design). A summary of estimated construction costs is presented in Table 4. Table 4 Estimated Construction Costs 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Alternative Estimated Construction Cost Underpin Existing Foundation w/ $1,900,000.00 Resistance Piers Underpin Existing Foundation w/ Drilled $1,460,000.00 Mini-Piles Completely New Pile Supported $740,000.00 Foundation System Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the completed analysis, the cost to provide the needed support to the existing piles to carry the proposed building is not reasonable. Supporting and underpinning the existing foundation will cost approximately $700,000.00 to $1,200,000.00 more than building a new foundation, depending upon which remedial alternative is selected. This does not include the remedial costs associated with repairing the existing superstructure. We believe that these latter costs could be significant and should be factored into a cost comparison of repairing the existing superstructure compared to new construction. 3 The estimated Construction Costs do not include design, permitting, or services during construction. 3�w`.J Mr. Anthony Roberto 7 February 1, 2005 We trust that this evaluation is suitable for your needs at this time and we await direction for final design of the selected alternative. In the meantime, please call us if you have any questions or require additional assistance. Sincerely, RT Group, Inc. Fairbanks Engineering Corporation I" OF 9 sf . S S n. c R SELL v IVIL m No.43 1 5 o�9F ER `N James B. Russell, P.E. Robert Fairbanks, P.E. Principal / Senior Project Manager President R:\Projects\04114.01 -Phase II Services\CORRES\Phase II Report.doc FIGURES NOTE: DRAWING SCANNED FROM A PLAN PROVIDED TO FAIRBANKS ENGINEERING BY AHARONIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION OF BU DEMOLISHEDTP- ' 5 B-1 73' � F Is 7 s B 4A O R y�lyr\A, TP-4 Ill 4 bis " B-2 d ' 7 3� �B-`vD - 1OLD POWER. nr 66 %. PLANT r TP2�y ONE STORY y'y Ap lam. D (DEMOLISH 'TION O o=i yV s. 5 V HED — o FOUR Fxi;Ai✓G 0 7.Y I 1 ;(DEMO�OEI) I BUILDING B✓�'O„vG i•I c {I LISH CrTP-1 t. s 0- O ``�” s ^r rns-crNr_�• li e "d"u>+a4_�Q o� �d ° .a .'I fFn '"r n (J9't LEGEND SCALE: 1"=60' B-4 SOIL BORING (BY NH BORING FOR FEC, JUNE 28-30, 2004) TP-4 TEST PIT (BY FRED AND BARNEY DEMOLITION FOR FEC, DECEMBER 2004) EXISTING BUILDING RT Group, Inc 28 GOODHUE STREET SHEET t of 1 � Group, uP FIGURE 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BORING AND TEST PIT DATE: "'T'"m""'e""`•sm�'°z DEC 2004 4' 31 RFo l4 275 NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC LOCATION PLAN PROD No. r wr ase3rm rwr ne ms EAST BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS rmd-m wnav....d a+c�r�:m•..w 04114.01 FILENAME: 04114.00/DWGS/TEST PIT PLAN.DWG INTERIOR B-3 TIMBER GROUND SURFACE ti COLUMN (EL. 0, ASSUMED DATUM)'? FLOOR 0 STT SLAB k. I a � f r r t 28 a 67 a-r v r s27r r ✓ :� t ;t-> >i v- r- 5 0 > � � r rxr 4 2 } s c c c> Z S1 13 � ss �s�� r�;r`' r^I r` 4, �sC.tC " `c `< �s-r1$s J�� r'•� W W !FILL-: Y=f ,•-'�. *'-� 7 zf.(. `- i r i i - 7-r '�'�( T`e'l ' ��,.t 0 W W 1 11 W W WrV W W W W W W W W W W O W W Q W W W W W W WY W W W W W W .Y 1 W W L— NY d PEAT W W . . . W W .Y o W TIMBER 13 PILE. -20 -- . .. . . . ., ..' 13 i SILT/SAND ' ..N,. VALUES INTERIOR COLUMN CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 1 N.T.S. RT Group, Inc 28 GOODHUE STREET SHEET 1 of 1 E,i .m from e,.c�ee uP DATE 1W Tunwn Menue.$OUe W12 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS FIGURE 2 DEC-04 T 4oI 438 slop F aol 4se Fa1Prov°""`'""v°e1M 52750TJ14 NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC EAST BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS PROD u«R�ra xm.awc swmi,d oa�r 04114.4. 01 FILENAME: 04114.00/DWGS/SALEM FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL B-3 GROUND SURFACE (EL. 0, ASSUMED FLOOR DATUM) SLAB 0 z r r -'i 67 �� s t " 4 27 r r t f P ? T HCl r f / I Z 13 � � w hr Y Y yr s, _ � J y ''y e E r r r -.r r f -f .a r .,/ l �.!" r r ^ LIJ W` W J' V LL 3w -10 W W W W 1 W W W W W y y W W W W .Y . J. W W .Y .Y O ` 2 m LQL W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N W PEAT W 2 W 1 W W W W W W w TIMBER 13 PILE. . -20 13 . . 1 SILT/SAND „N.. VALUES PERIMETER WALL CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 2 N.T.S. 11cl RT Group, IAC, 28 GOODHUE STREET SHEET 1 of 1 Eoemee�ed Irani me Ground uv DATE Iw Faumon Avenue,Suite zoz SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS FIGURE 3 Em PnMderee,Rhode Island 02914 NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC DEC-04 T ao1—to438 E 40l aae sns EAST BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS PROD 041144.. e<aHno�l xmemmm swm.�1 e�� uwE�.;�o�,nmw 01 FILENAME: 04114.00/DWGS/SALEM FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL B-2 GROUND SURFACE FLOOR (EL. 0, ASSUMED SLAB DATUM) ky '• 7 r' 't�� K, i v '',. t,M ':. "'r's-,max, w--s-=� ..qr;c r'� ' �'16 r— r r.<<_r'; _� _r _r x i r —r" r_..*1,5 �'�f�-,i 6.0" W H 1 • W W 1 W Y W W '•. .Y Y 1 W W W W .VAR W W W W W W Y W W W 1 W W W W 1 Y W O iVt W J / ILL. - 10 WW 1W WWWW WWWW .W WY .W WJ' 1 OW WOH W . . . WW LLI Q ca W W W N 1 Y W Y W Y W W W W J W W W N W W W 1 W W W W W W W W Y L W W W W W W LL PEAT W 'TIMBER PILE; 17 SEE NOTE 1 -2020 SILT/SAND j .N,. VALUES NOTES: TIMBER PILE NOT EXTRACTED AT THIS LOCATION, PILE LENGTH UNKNOWN PERIMETER WALL CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 4 N.T.S. RT Group, Inc. 28 GOODHUE STREET SHEET 1 of i EngineerM flan the Gaunt Op DATE 10)T4untal Avenue 6U 2@ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS FIGURE 4 Fan Pari ,dw4e Ana0201a DEC-134T 401 4M 31M F M1 4M 5M NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC PROJ No. 1 xW1 g cw �E� � EAST BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 04114.01 FILENAME 04114.00/DWGS/SALEM FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG INTERIOR B-1 TIMBER GROUND SURFACE COLUMN (EL. 0, ASSUMED FLOOR DATUM)7 SLAB 0 20 FILL 39" 6 . . . . . . ., —t 7 12' ,PEAT 2 . . . . . . z 16 e-1 i9 kli' J�4 w LLI W10 'f5 0 LU6 K �'P LLJ Ca t;;y 1-- Ln5i PEAT. . . . . . . . . . LU 15i 201 00 SAND TIMBER VALUES PILE INTERIOR COLUMN CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 5 N.T.S. RT Group, Inc 28 GOODHUE STREET SHEET I of 1 bnire h th Gaunt Up DATE 197 T.�A��M2 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS FIGURE 5 DEC-04 T Q1 4%31W IF�l 4M 5M NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC PROD No. EAST BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 04114.01 FILENAME: 04114.00/DWGS/SALEM FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS 55 p� 1 .4IV4 ➢✓. All 4 Tel . • MUMMKIMIT • . �Yi t • A r y z n x 4� r 5 4 ��T.1`J� .�� ♦ � � t, �A.P t a ... u. !1 j r CW. R .,7 a. g r, �. ` r � *�a��. . �., �,t--moo,,� } a 1 � �� y �^. � � � � � � -� • �• � S 4 � A o- ,r, is ... `3s' / r3 � R s.. ,,. ��..�", s�� p 4ia. � �� ,� ,.� � .m &`".r a !� t�� 8e � � 3*'a.. E rte,,,. '.r # ss '�� f s� '+ham t r '4 p a A. �a a 4 � �, .o jM'. t .). ,T 1` �"` ��5� � 'max . 1 l E Y ,� � �� "' _ � ��I a�I jl + ..� ' r . � }<_ IIA�y � � Y 4 4 'A �4 �4 Photo No. 7: Crawl Space below Interior Floor Slab at Test Pit No. 3 (unable to confirm timber pile locations). r }• 'V t �v r.v I f Photo No. 8: Timber Pile at Test Pit No. 4 (Perimeter Footing) Sd \ I § } el \ < ® jo • . . $ } \ ° ° �/2 - f ( \\® \ 3i � APPENDIX B SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS EXISTING TIMBER PILE CAPACITY IncAGE 1 0I RTGroup, nce PROJECT Z8 �OUD1♦U� 57- PROJECT NO. yd ¢'a 1 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT T I K 3t`'L COMPUTATIONS BY- 2 DATE CHECK BY BATE _ -Vi2P6SE i f--S77; t4,9.r"E 7r-/E7 C'R J]ie-I T/ O`i 77'/.E L'1��5"77•�/C� %rWB t`�. 77+E i Z P Go T RQ ST, -6\j 1A - i tQ;veL—CD vvK til R'`kj� I_F=E __ 'o TIwE � SILL `D!+-"�-`JSto'J.S •4� FOl:l.awSi,.__ __, i 1 TEST. 'PrT dC'F ' By 7^5' 7)]I.� - r. - -, 77P — J` 9 S "tiro- sd GZ.,I j6 , eve __- • '77�-- Ql�G .'a'r--L �-_ FLC�. .r� GOop C +w 4,'r'tvv .. — -- T/ht eb L^-C_ 'AILC c,7nn..ac,Ty� , S A f0 -a,�,9 ar.,v OG '. -- 0 20" S Ov TO mrI- SeTTLC.AavT oe 7flE' (�rLML:v.NC,- :�-itL i?lA S. ANO w II.L. Gcn/'7rNVE - . . 7� UCCA/,r, - jllff 'in coly s'oLtOa-rz vU Actin 1 tJ(17-rN4V4 -cFcsarl-( C��C'..cErrr�"CI-T'v.�' _ I ASSUw Tm�^.)S '• • f<SSv e-tE AlJ P VNjt: ,G cs TJkA Ov - --- _ASS4� p P.J-�cf{G� TtP "Dt`�_._ !o n ._ (Q� —.O 78 - _ . . _ � Foc.iww,Y�6 so�L s'�reo?�t-r�� S•' I _TI srcT/5C,2), IZo 312 -- II j4 I 0-47W-r- `DR.A-,w/C.O Incp / PAGE v- U, RTGroup, nPROJECT za 6acsDVcv� ST. PROJECT NO. 04 It 4,o 1 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT -rf"q t—C. OATACA7'P C� COMPUTATIONS BY �� DATE CN ECR BY • _`'-• DATE QL "C0ti1CL St r.1 S o ;Y5- I T/wr El:cJ 'P(t-€ ,-4 ANJ _ - -- * '_ _..:.. �- .__. i 1 R6+J6 L<S FR o�4 q 3 I Ov_4o - LL � I e iilE _ c 23 VfLA/OSE�j - - _ _ 7L� .� Sv?I�cl'2'(�'`'�__F�✓n/OfFi76"V CO'VSM of � t-� -_ Inc PAGE 3 _W 0F RTGroup, c. PROJECT Z 8 6oavk�� PR OI ECT No. 0411 4. D Engineered From the Ground Up s o BJECT -T I-A + '/SIA-je CAOA(A rY COMPUTATIONS BY 9" DATE CHECK BY- DATE . - � �` J t - ' CRk-ev6A�?�_S i S7.1f4rcrT '.A+J - Y70i N'T lC. ASSv S _`7-`/ it G41—.,) _ t? IX a _ I I ili l yy r I i i i r R� I. 13 I i SILT - 07 } _ I � cl. p GOR. 'AVtw t�il,5r -1-5 = k g Z Y t•1-an � I k S ' -- -•S o)L4')c�3o�c ( I-an, I7.� 11 - �:sgrs , n (t 4) C (¢L13oR[¢�a 41C13� j6Z4PEF �� ( r7°) Z4ZZPs pMa r 13aPor 4%C133 l/3o - 67, 4-rc ;) +IG C90 -6z pc4)K�zr /_I) I 1 I I CF! IncJ PAGE - OF� RT Group, nc. PRO ECT za 6000�rv� ST-. OT�iq ' 7 ' I PROTECT NO. Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT Tt"15e�f— -P�fGppLe C�PAC i'ry // COMPUTATIONS BY 5/1a�[q�fp,E� DATE r� CHECK BY -DATE TS L f4 K13ovcv 2_S_ P S ,ToP aG Sic?/SWC I .; . V � / � i59 � Z4Z4S ) ;"� r lav r _ I I — �" S I N - 1 s � s ,Q s` �'_ 2S2 std ( 2rti, (q.S - I = - I i �w7 �4_o Po2_ �3z I I i �O/ 4..2 ��? x o.20 •?rZ PAGE OF RT Group, Inc PROJECT GV c a, H E PR OI ECT N0. I4,a Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT Te wt/"�t!2� '?rr-E, CAVAL I7Y COMPUTATIONS BY P DATE -�� -0 .S✓ CH ECJ( BY " DATE Ccp�l of avS iwLl -7w 4CH '_ 7i G- VL77'KA'rGF* C11-Y�.TfCr,7Y /�S _ CA,ox mY I S n..,FA-•7�rJ ; 2.�+./G -- CO N-t n -7Zr Grli%FF AT, - `ANr�, -! 715t 0,, �`!/[.E' C'A(� S__`'T7 `T±-i�- " Lam._ I��YM...C/{77A : . SES K/n7<)cA+L� 12 IJ ,J -Alk)A`/ �xaTD- O ''TcFvt;N(� PrAv 02 /hT IQ—rp-r02- -C.'O wldl $ VCoallo�J � 'FEL/ SSE rSTtv6cK� F:- I TRfBv I`/ qAL i 330St _ Sr ��2 — 6ovs� x 3':3o sem : Z��I400 2- Faao !L – LS"PSC , 33t� sem- 8, 2SO x 3- E f Q � —, a S :eg r 0 _ , o 4-n-c rw�o�. Z S 'eSF x 33o Sri- — er Som - 2gof 2 SCjji ' + Q3z, S iz J Table 1 S'�7 Static Capacity Summary 28 Goodhue Street Building Prepared b RT Group, Inc.,Janua 10,2005 Pile Penetration in Stratum FT Estimated Friction TIF Estimated Capacity TONS Pile Upper Lower Upper Lower Percent Area Type Fill Peat Silt/Sand Fill Fill Peat Silt/Sand Fill Fs Pt(1) Pult Pall 2 Friction TP-1 Timber 4.5 6 1 0 0.24 0.20 0.30 0.24 2.58 4.0 7 3 39 TP-2 Timber 3 6.5 1 0 0.24 0.20 0.30 0.24 2.32 4.0 6 3 37 TP-5 Timber 2 7 5.5 2 0.24 0.20 0.30 0.24 4.01 4.0 8 4 50 (1)See Static Capacity calculations for estimate of point bearing. (2)Pall =PuIUFS,where FS=2.0. l 4� C d � _ n x ti y i 1 Y ` � r� � - °...J,y�Y?�•(.iJ'� 6*1^�M�JJ �Y•. '�`::J_•tF Z ''-s.�-~ ,x M ��v I.� , t►... �. �_ "� �� '&�'^'u,�+�,�,,,�•T-..A.Y� •�r,.s�*.�. = "�1jy��t+� _ -tea.r �,.� .. tj pi 1 •4y ,F Yom:'\I ~' � � _ �, + i tr1. "�� „ I N 7C , — i cv 4m 'I i i =T ==r- i I rr I r %J --L-17 d rn N A -- , � l i I ' I �nvrm nmiw n•na. r* i V I i I m I i \ m A i i � I� I i _ — o i I - i 0 F-1 i - 1rNm iT71 i I i _ mroo vm nmi 1 i i I I I - i I. � I --s 0 U� i I i I I I i i ' 1 I 1 1 � i I 1 I El I ❑ I I i r Page 1 of 1 James B. Russell From: Laurie Gibeau [Igibeau@rtg-eng.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:40 PM To: 'James B. Russell' Subject: 28 Goodhue Street Hi, Jim- Bob Fairbanks called with these numbers: Exterior wall column spacing: 8'3"on center Interior column spacing: 16'6"on center(east-west axis), 20' on center(north-south axis) Len th of building they are trying to save: 222'8" dS 0 1 `� -�, Dead loads + 2nd 3rd 4th floors and roof: 20-25 psf 11 floor: 80 psf Perimeter walls: 20 psf for face, not including pile cap Live loads: Roof: 30 psf 2nd 3rd, 4th floors: 50 psf(residential) 1 st floor: 100 psf(commercial) Laurie Gibeau Project Engineer RT Group, Inc. 197 Taunton Avenue, Suite 202 East Providence, Rhode Island 02914 Phone: 401 438 3100 Fax: 410 438 5275 1/10/2005 Group , - OUrjn y/'�� y PAGE (0 ^O rJ RTI V , i c PROJECT ZV GNU �uE S� PROJECT NO. OT'1T Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT 77� lb VL- 91 L, J!"Ae cTY COMPUTATIONS BYE;5- DATE CHECK By- -DATE ��✓ 1 �' 1 - - -+, LS7Tw.t Lry t—N✓�1Si rl._ 1 toa ._& .. ... �s? =io�Ps x 33 cog 3 loon r I 1 E - 77 4 0 _ - -- - J. TU_C!a/(� dL L ) IAS_ .I - '7-Fjl./nN y `7{-7 .4 T-K/A'1'7r�-�^G/ CgAr S - _ i i L -707)4 L D L 2 L f: AT ' J is8.721 ►c 79, r Ll 'J'€12 •-t� 'w i : S• �..� 1 T � i- is�r- Fcaol� - a�Psc ,c c� Sc~ _ __ _ �Oi4 , 3�tr Ia z S psc x o' '3r 2J000 S' -' all a a 400 R/ Group,/ Inc PR OI ECT ZLJyB �F S PROJECT NO. O-4114 . Ol Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT PVL. D/mac CN04(arY COMPUTATIONS BY / !L DATE CHECK BY —DATE—J�� L iCJ GOV I I I j : I I / ._ 'o o e e c -sP,a 1 - --- ur.1G (0 4 �c/z,.2r o-L •A''1a l,i.. o: _+l a�'t. Psi_ K (1 /C ' 46�.'i ' ._ : I /S'y`I - I/ 00 ri'3F X C�J�OI�Z" t-2--f 8 7.1 4 j � AlSF K I , I - -' -'; - 1 I I ! T[ cT4 L 7J L } [ A7— :D�t/ 'd�bL w 9�i 16, I/C 4, 4/C' I cSZ` C'C `L C G�av�4? CAnfdc 1y A `� crs Ld• s� PC?S I /9ccw,ni --P"NL FS"n � r'oSs. j I`�i j_L- j.` I a I J I I I ' 1 Table 2 7,4/7 Group FOS Estimate 28 Goodhue Street Building Prepared by RT Group, Inc.,January 10,2005 Tributary Area Pile Cap Perimeter Wall TributaryArea Total Unfactored No.of Group Group Min Recommended Area Location DL(TONS) DL(TONS) DL(TONS) LL(TONS) DL+LL(TONS) P„ii(1) Piles per Location P.ft FOS(2) FOS TP-1 Interior Column 29.70 3.45 -- 46.20 79.35 7 4.0 28 0.4 2.0 TP-2 Perimeter 8.20 2.20 3.20 11.20 21.60 6 2.0 12 0.6 2.0 TP-5 Interior Column 29.70 3.45 -- 46.20 79.35 8 4.0 32 0.4 2.0 (1)See Static Capacity calculations for Ultimate Pile Capacity. 2 Grou Ultimate Ca aci /Total Unfadored DL+LL V� Table 3 Group FOS Estimate w/Downdrag Included 28 Goodhue Street Building Prepared by RT Group,Inc.,January 10,2005 Total Unfactored Downdrag No.of Total Total Unfactored Group Group Min Recommended Area Location DL+LL(TONS)(1) (TONS)(1) Piles per Location Downdrag(TONS) w/Downdrag(TONS) P„„(2) P„n FOS(3) FOS TP-1 Interior Column 79.35 2.28 4.0 9 88 4.7 18.9 0.2 1.0 TP-2 Perimeter 21.60 2.02 2.0 4 26 4.0 8.0 0.3 1.0 TP-5 Interior Column 79.35 2.36 4.0 9 89 5.6 22.6 0.3 1.0 Footnotes: (1)See Table 2. (2)See Static Capacity calculations for Ultimate Pile Capacity(Downdrag subtracted out). 3 Group Ultimate CapacftyfTotal Unfactored w/Downdrag. RESISTANCE PIERS Inc � PAGE I s ^Of RTGroup, nc. PROJECT 28 Gaa'DNVt ST' PR OI ECT NO. 04- it e., Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT RE St S'dle�lG E tom,LrlL� COMPUTATIONS BY -- -/� DATE CHECK 6Y /r DATE /tr �sE DGS R-HAND ?rscs ET,�IvP4 t"s-z� l t:e Sg t'rm/c 41 jiaE._ LdL)GPH 7?J d'u?�JS T 7NC /Ld6�OSG� ,_%3 tlj qJ V,Ca �„ (o E'IdsG7KtG Zzi I ' Li r i- 1 _I�jIV EU,.51 0, ES'r7rK2�1 _ 'A L.14, LLL ' _ SP..I !.� �o21 cc7Lvvt✓ 719x¢ 1 —t a f. ,G9 -.�_ ..r . LL r®I L')c;7L'v(,c .' �aL uP+l_ S.. Z4_:$ ,.:. I I SE'C �So�L, "p �r'Tc. r_1,rtT ;v 'ln,. r3t G '1�'rC �' I�(,C - 577A1 G- 77 wt3-Ls',YL I G��S �N �I A-N -1- I Cf11�A,Lt 7Y_ 1 V6 J I T } _{ , r Y" o rq—tL'`A S' _ �S�iV_iti1G �_',➢`�c?5� � "��- S� —A'T11AccFi - — • 'Prztt�yLQ!" `F rL�' �! AtC.i' T CS I Il li I I I assu.a,7�S SOJILL _FK.CiF1-r_L� 3 I`_a41/ 3- �+ (I _ _ s err, T I '- • 'J;ES "T JCL' -lS �E^2[ti `TL-i�11e. C%tot AC TY_,'F qxmi n + C`AL -{� � i �Gr 1 ��iC V� I I I : i' - r_ — r T , - jj , _t7 - -1. I �-S'r73VG!£ ! A(•yGS'...;, .-I -1 � 4 - I I II I Atlas Foundation Systems, Inc. —Page 3 ofd Z/5 IXISTING BUILDING II II II EXISTING EDDYING� � ' LATLAS PIERS I NEW SLAB AT LOWER ELEVATIDN� PLAN VIEW Below is a cross sectional sketch of the Atlas Pier installed to the existing structure and the relationship of the ne original structure. Corrtinuoui Cnncrah 1 . . Spread Footing AM per 1 – 1 _ T li-B"Column w1h Little or _ No Lataral Sail Support JIM,QD.Sleeve { New Anirhed Roar Qver4'paTo Stiffen Sepnentad Ik Joinh Load Beadny Strata atS9,5 Feet 9elow Footing SECTION http://www.atiasfoundations.com/110-12.htm1 1/14/2005 IncPAGE 3 OF z RTGroup, nPROJECT ZEl 6//60'bF(Vtz Ste, PROJECT NO. C)4114" D1 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT TC-S-/ 6 7741!C ig �PI t..<S COMPUTATIONS BY P �a DATE CHECK 0Y C`W' DATE CaCCL 1 �A -1 ' 77, " NLMt �TlruSZ 0/[G C9'f�C.S i o< 2NATLASPr CEJ a,o�"Ti� �– Z ^� O 7/F .F/T, , 14 (0°T /r'T ' i./ rc h. I ~� I ` a ZM 7E7�T,c.ci.r r-✓� � �rN G�f U^'S� CAl _v � _. _. LAS 7-. CQ va-t.na h AsSuo 4 RI S S«r,,CT teW S "Pec K +tau I Cacv � b'LS -0 t:� r:Ico Tkyacl Lv«n^l � I 2 _ -�-- assv,µ� 2 �rJs c� �J 10 (3 i n EW; - �9 �7.a r x `f) _ 32 7��' IN t -I O PIt_£YM . cozy ,Ns - 4i / <I , T . c X veru o.0 _ �Z 4 •' T x 2D: 1 C7.,.o T x — /J -tell /eot�r-M I /'�/'` / PAGE 4- � RTGroup, /nc PROJECT P bYy uE PROJECT N0. Q41 1 Engineered From the Ground Op SUBJECT �•FES-1 S'f2J C 'P1 Lam. 3 COMPUTATIONS BY- DATE CN ECN BY �w/ -DATE I _ 1 ' y �At C'V L I J I LCL LNGrJ�'/ QL_Zti�`X_ C'OLJw,EA/ !t (d. ST/f'7- ;-l6 r� a-I 21, 71F7)�IX._� 217 it G I - - - I I _ ` ._ I _ I I _ ' ' I >-1 - - -i-- .... o S`'r' ^1Zr T `7 q rlrr�C s ' /3 6 r- I --7o. - i y tT_ sn r� r© .� 5 S� c6 Til -SJ. PL'Y,C C L�rw� I `? T/�T), '.- ✓3 0 T —cs of-Sr r ./ : I _ I Inc7 / PAGE Is OF 16 RTGroup, nPROJECT 28 Gotobxt c S""' PROJECT NO. 04-I1¢.o j Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT ��SI S�JYhJG� S COMPUTATIONS 6Y �/p�/(�/✓y� DATE CHECK RY DATE C�Lc'uc a1 s cam, I d-'(o O' I 71 ALI - I 1 ; -, r _ (0-t/? roF rlX ) i7 8 p 4i�._7 w,�t It ! L'_i-H i IZIIIS'71xlG C--PFEYC.'vr` - ! r - - _, 4 K3 U b+J ' m `f- T/FT) i- _ i.../OT LQ_r — pr48 — G ,sf I , I '. 6 = r 3 ,S_ ti SS IJ - 0 I, * _ , DRILLED MINI-PILES Z6 r�U PAGE0 IncL RT Group, PROJECT G�nr��a ST' PROJECT N0, 411¢ 01 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT -Z)K I C_t_c°Dtl t�� Lt COMPUTATIONS BY �r>�cC• BATE ^�4 SOS CHECK BTC/i DATE __.-__ S ZEE'-stzcrou. � �'c_ Et�.a7 J'Drei �� :runli -`�rJ�E , Lty '�-f 79 S c�2T 7z,L� /�zcr? r 3urc oY� `-- Co N! cS ?✓G J I j r _lam ..i-. ' t- I ' G 1'JI -Xj 7 SI T EST i i 7J r L G @ N` tia2 Cd LuM�[S I I _ I _ I I a Q C. A.E.nnS-.a - - r ILivj I - - -i 1L L 17 I I I - � tr PrCOFru� '=acne I i'BJ I =¢AI - � S�iTr_ �✓rr' .4 K L-11S 12 T ' 3} G c /2 Y 2 014 ♦ �_ _ 17 i j �m �2l LES i_�tlN tnJt� S_ CK V�t�' E_72 ICVkt�9 �y I I I j I l)I A i TSI i-.I .S L I � r t- L __ Co tJC U 3t S - NligYtr .c 6 v &Fs v eL Ltc l+eD �I -17 + �_a �S oJIG /�G/ - y .1 {._ ._J I ... - I r _ f j-- ttl Vt z 1-I "l2I 2' D r&L ` 1 MIv%4 G a./G El9 � - - I . r PAGE 2 OF RT Group, Inc oa6u r ST. PROJECT Z 6� .� PROJECT NO. Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT ICI�C.LJ w. J�J<�'A/t-ES C COMPUTATIONS BY O DATE -/7-o�J CHECK 6Y ��•�' DATE _ - 7-7 O/ZS Z. /GT .yX _�.� HI.vI - rr�E ` -- - • //'�'� 'I'/F'F + _ i- i � y i •C•�F�JrY N— — Zb O. T/ I Y _ S/GT/S�I..O - F T ;-.^ / /i F Il..'.-T/FT •il - - I __ I b 4-- a lDc�cceo:AoE) — 1 r7 sESTE eUG7?.YSSE�'f_iA LGE Jl µtrN/- 4✓ACY ES D°u� i E1/E a c c�tfl I I •J' CO.LVw.J �LoAq Si _ b E �. .'Dlzt�c.�-_r-cE:�� Py.��'S '4f 's%J•-R21cvc 'c;a�.,-,� S_ A SS T M'n/I j . S 7 5 � S1JN 'TEH /C6 f 2 S "�+•Et�,.G _ L; ,C ¢T K Z O IC.�7UT "TD'J$ - : Of U�q �z`W Q c)krt?ru G [-(24 � 7' x 2 7 ;8quv S —Cac � uuS - I _ I PAGE a3 OF RTGroup, Inc. PROJECT 26 ccl S-17 PROJECT NO. Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT �Kl�l.�c'O 4/A''��jt —@FL+E1 COMPUTATIONS BY— , DATE /-f 7Os CHECK BY h DATE ,�20-ps Cl9tC:V t�t��'J S C o.L I - • _z i I I _ L TiGt + LI A-1_l I I L I J-4- L, F t - I - lil l _ J JI. I J � I__li � I. I I I _.._ I —i : I F 74F144_. I Mrlil Pit I 4EV6TT.d aJ. 3~ea 1a ,38T/cT)Zk /7 8 wrP / ot? /> SY: ,r r io r I_ ; - `_ I- I I - i - - �_ - .; I NEW TIMBER PILE FOUNDATION }/'��T Group, e I IncC] PAGE I O F RGroup, nPROJECT 2B GO��tVE ST' ' PRO)ECT NO. 6GTi14'al Engineered from the 6666Ground Up SUBJECT )J X= j -Tk-9t2.. 'k,�1.6 S COMPUTATIONS BY -DATE /-74_o S CHECK BY • WP BATE TU4 PT SE ` /DE7L<.v, (. T/-� E 1 111 . , _ QVICE3�J I )LE Lc4l1G _.- !i ^yC'�-J - %2!! QI _-�-n,,.c!9�_c. CA< caL 1IMJS = 71,41 I_ bl: -r L <2 ERZ cot: Cna fH QS s L4�8 T - I 01, 5't ofli� ti/ 'T %?G,, u2 ASS'v �� Sz,L , : — If CCA_ '>•1Kcs'�'TkSI -c01�2. '�J l€Y.)A - - — B s�rL aceFic� clic -'4 4r4 rte' Q-(,? 19 1LIE "Ul7Cl CY, _!rHryY` Gt . 1'=.c R cc�r.l NATt J 0'F"_ I � C,4 LCUi.2MCIJS~. S /a'tivscAt ' , _QQNCLVSI�S'�_ o '+JLcrorC. 910c:=v,.rti1 LL, C' Cv, ,,J, `7-V L-S Nor `/p SIE - -. r �O G oal6 mJl I ES'Tr A- .rte' I`1JL t L IncPAGE Of RT Group, nPROJECT 2 6 s,7, PROJECT NO. 0411,4 G I Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT MCW ="-tt,ES COMPUTATION$ BY `T u BATE CHECK 8Y •'u DATE I-Zp _ . . Ass,UwAeC— StI— •��C.q IJ_�. " �:.__ ps ... _ FX/ �/G G .. . Sam 130 I?t - - 120 t' [Z-Z � 4 s/ �ISA--J.D d is�y F -lL v _ 7 w2tn i 1 ' i pica. - a«/S rif z I _ L 4 y /� le�] Incc7AGE RT Group, YI c PROJECT 2-8 GozoHije Sr.TO4IIQ �� I III PROJECT HO. Engineered From the Ground Up 5 U B I F CT /6��,J 71 V-4 at�- T-A�ti�S �i COMPUTATIONS BY "��>� [IATE CH EC IF BY Pum DATE CSA LGu L dna S COU Ii . i N - 2 _ Z, LI - _. .L I 1L .CIC rl dJD i I = 5R roo �z.. =7 46, 144 T Group,, PAGE�0f RI Gp,, Inc P A 0 J ECT Zr1 larzxur� S7 PROJECT NO. c)41I4,0 � Engineered From the Ground Up S DJ ECT ^f Ew �J7^/'t3eyc—' mJ L65 C OM PD TA T 10 N5 0Y `Rit� DATE CHECK BY �"�• DATE 09CCUC-4�! ,s (a`s I, 2szP-r II E - i p !!qhstj4 Y �S . pie 1 Tzvuoc atv ..t�1 - A,V&jw C— 77. ,4 'r x 2' 3q. vsr¢ , f e 4.8 1. cows `d 2r0 � _ 7tiE2EC�10 '�ttLE. I4-W6 T�( � ( 6�2`�J ZT T L' �o a- 6 ,i 'r r III 2tiTt411, v2 Go L' µNr S.• ` i i _ '3 II r PAGE Of S RT/ Group, Inc PROJECT � ST' PROJECT NO. y�'�Ia iD Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT /`�"�-'^-� -T7P,'sJult Pt,-Iff-S COMPUTATIONS BY CO� Q BATE CHECK BY Rw• BATE e41 Cu i. 2 n�T ) r � C6 +'-,O 26 'tlfli` `Y9- Q trc oc v> 5 4(, err .T)( af) r o,SCll /rT)(X I _ I TICT)CX OD' tf T _ I i � r .... 1. _ IT- T _. t i _ _ I 1 APPENDIX C COST BACK-UP DATA Table C-1 Budget-Level Construction Cost Estimate Installation of Resistance Piers Unit of Estimated Unit Extended Item Description Payment Quantity Price Total Comments 1 General Requirements Mix.Contractor Submittals LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Estimators Judgment Record Drawings LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Estimators Judgment $4,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $4,000.00 2 Mobilization Mobilize Men,Equipment,and Materials LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Estimators Judgement and Includes partial payment on materials $25,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $25,000.00 3 Demolition and Removal for Pier Installation Saw Cut Floor Slab @ Interior Columns LF 560 $3.00 $1,680.00 Assumes 10'x 10'area cut around each column Saw Cut Floor Slab @ Interior Walls LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes a 222'x 45'interior footprint Saw Cut Floor Slab/Asphalt Pave @ Exterior Columns LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes 222'long cut on each side and 45'long cut on ends Excavate and Remove Interior Floor Slab/Pavement CY 340 $50.00 $17,000.00 Estimators Judgment,Assumes extensive hand-work Excavate Fill for Resistance Pier Installation CY 650 $20.00 $13,000.00 Estimators Judgement Transportation R Disposal of Demolition Debris TON 650 $60.00 $39,000.00 Assumes Non-Contaminated Demolition Debris $73,860.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $73,860.00 4 Resistance Pier Installation Furnish and Install Piers @ Interior Columns EA 140 $3,500.00 $490,000.00 Assumes 14 Interior Columns x 10 Piers/Column(14x10=140)' Furnish and Install Piers @ Exterior Columns EA 264 $3,000.00 $792,000.00 Assumes 66 Exterior Columns x 4 Piers/Column(66x4=264)' Backfill It Compact Around Piers w/Excavated Fill CY 650 $10.00 $6,500.00 Estimators Judgment $1,288,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $1,288,500.00 5 Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Slab Drill and Grout Reinforcing at Columns EA 80 $500.00 $40,000.00 Estimators Judgement Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Slab CY 370 $500.00 $185,000.00 Estimators Judgement $225,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $225,000.00 6 Demobilization and Clean-up Demobilization and Clean-up LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Estimators Judgement $10,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,626,360.00 Sum of Bid Item Nos.1-6 SCOPE AND BUDGET CONTINGENCIES�20% $325,272.00 Contingencies° TOTAL ESTIMATE $1,960,000.00 Rounded Up to the Nearest$10,000. Actual costs may vary. Footnote' 'Resistance Pier costs are based on a recent project completed by New England Foundation and Stabilization Co.for the Narragansett Bay Commission where 70-foot-long Resistance Piers were installed for about$5,000.00/EA. A cost of about$3,000.00 to$3,500.00/EA has been assumed for this project based an economy scale and the actual distribution of costs assumed. 2The Contingencies estimate Does Not include dewatering that may be required to install the proposed alternative or the possible need to handle contaminated groundwater as a result of dewatering activities. aesa.M.ru,amm.n.a. Page of 4/1/2005 1 Table C-2 Budget-Level Construction Cost Estimate Installation of Drilled Mini-Piles Unit of Estimated Unit Extended Item Description Payment Quantity Price Total Comments 1 General Requirements Mix.Contractor Submittals LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Estimators Judgment Record Drawings LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Estimator's Judgment $4,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $4,000.00 2 Mobilization Mobilize Men,Equipment,and Materials LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Estimators Judgement and Includes partial payment on materials $25,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $25,000.00 3 Demolition and Removal for Pile Installation Saw Cut Floor Slab @ Interior Columns LF 560 $3.00 $1,680.00 Assumes 10'x 10'area cut around each column Saw Cut Floor Stab @ Interior Walls LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes a 222'x 45'interior footprint Saw Cut Floor Stab/Asphalt Pave @ Exterior Columns LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes 222'tong cut on each side and 45long cut on ends Excavate and Remove Interior Floor Slab/Pavement CY 340 $50.00 $17,000.00 Estimators Judgment Excavate FILL for Mini-Pile Installation CY 650 $20.00 $13,000.00 Estimators Judgement Transportation Is Disposal of Demolition Debris TON 650 $60.00 $39,000.00 Assumes Non-Contaminated Demolition Debris $73,860.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $73,860.00 4 Drilled Mint-Pile Installation Furnish and Install Mini-Piles @ Interior Columns EA 84 $4,700.00 $394,800.00 Assumes 14 Interior Columns x 6 Mini-Piles/Column' Furnish and Install Mini-Piles @ Exterior Columns EA 132 $3,600.00 $475,200.00 Assumes 66 Exterior Columns x 2 Mini-Piles/Column Backfill B Compact Around Piles w/Excavated FHL CY 650 $10.00 $6,500.00 Estimators Judgment $876,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost IS 1 $876,500.00 5 Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Slab Drill and Grout Reinforcing at Columns EA 80 $500.00 $40,000.00 Estimators Judgment Furnish and InstaO New Structural Floor Stab CY 370 $50D.OD $185,000.00 Estimators Judgment $225,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cast LS 1 $225,000.00 6 Demobilization and Clean-up Demobilization and Clean-up LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Estimators Judgement $10,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,214,360.00 Sum of Bid Item Nos.1-6 SCOPE AND BUDGET CONTINGENCIES @ 20% $242,872.00 Contingencies TOTAL ESTIMATE $1,460,000.00 Rounded Up to the Nearest$10,000. Actual costs may vary. Footnote: 'Drilled Mini-Pile casts are based on a recent project completed by G.Donaldson Construction Co.,Inc.,for the Pastore Federal Building In Providence,RI. The Drilled Mini-Piles were about 50-feet-long on this project and cost about$5,300.00/EA. A cast of$3,600.00 to$4,700.001EA has been assumed for this project based on the estimated lengths and actual distribution of costs assumed. 'The Contingencies estimate Does Not include dewatering that may be required to install the proposed alternative or the possible need to handle contaminated groundwater as a result of dewatering activities. uinwn.snm.a,n. Page 1 of 1 2/12005 Table C-3 Budget-Level Construction Cost Estimate New Timber Pile Foundation Unit of Estimated Unit Extended Item Description Payment Quantity Price Total Comments 1 General Requirements Misc.Contractor Submittals LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Estimators Judgment Record Drawings LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Estimators Judgment $6,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $6,500.00 2 Mobilization Mobilize Men,Equipment,and Materials LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 Estimators Judgement and Includes partial payment on materials $35,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $35,000.00 3 .Demolition and Removal of Building/Foundation Demolish Building and Foundation,Complete LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 To be Verfied by Owner $75,000.00 Calculate Total of Bid Items LS 1 $75,000.00 4 Furnish and Install CCA Treated Timber Piles Furnish and Install Timber Piles @ Interior Columns LF 2,520 $25.00 $63,000.00 Assume 56 piles total x 45-foot-long piles(56x45=2,520LF) Furnish and Install Timber Piles @ Exterior Columns LF 1,980 $25.00 $49,500.00 Assume 66 piles total x 30-foot-long piles(66x30=1,980LF) Furnish Pile Top Tension Connector EA 122 $50.00 $6,100.00 Assume all piles fitted with No.8 Bar Tension Connection $118,600.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $118,600.00 5 Furnish and Install Pile Caps Excavation for Pile Caps LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance Item,Estimators Judgement Furnish and Install Interior Pile Caps CY 40 $600.00 $24,000.00 Assume a 6'x 6'x 18"THK Cap with a 2'x 2'x C Stem Furnish and Install Exterior Pile Caps CY 230 $600.00 $138,000.00 Assume a 4'wide x 18"THK Cap with a 2'x 4'Stem $162,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $162,000.00 6 Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Slab Reinforcing @ Columns and Structural Floor Slab EA 80 $500.00 $40,000.00 Estimators Judgement Compact Subgrade and Furnish Imported Fill LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance Item, Estimators Judgement Furnish and Insall New Structural Floor Slab CY 375 $500.00 $187,500.00 Assumes 222'x 45'x 12"THK $207,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $207,500.00 7 Demobilization and Clean-up Demobilization and Clean-up LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Estimators Judgement $10,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL $614,600.00 Sum of Bid Item Nos.1-7 SCOPE AND BUDGET CONTINGENCIES @ 2096 $122,920.00 Contingencies TOTAL ESTIMATE $740,000.00 Rounded Up to the Nearest$10,000. Actual costs may vary nmwr nu t tmae.xa Page 1 of 1 2/12005 Aharonian 8 Associates,Inc. 6 Blackstone Valley Place,Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 PROPOSED MIXED USE`DEVELOPMENTkPf�O.IfCT�� rt`°e } s� �$ REPORT�on,the�ARCHITECTURE ani��PMYSiC��x C`OND�TIO�V o�sthe ;M�. REPORT DATE: 4/14/04 s'.=n'r,'v»INSPECT(0N DATExt,5i*`.'i'- * . v'm,TNfb3E`lft#st , fz:i4+�`' , ...r'1 Ei1iTWH,[?w tai ..._iw # �: '�4r,E,nZ��r�AY,�lfee 3/24/04 10:00 AM Sunny 45 degrees F Tom Grafe, PE - C A Pretzer Associates Inc. Mark Humphrys, RA - Aharonian & Associates Inc. Aharonian & Associates Inc. (Architect) and C. A. Pretzer Associates (Structural Engineer) conducted an inspection of the main building to assess its Architectural value and present structural condition. The subject parcel of land is approximately 1.6 acres in area and has 2 existing structures on it. The main building is a 4 story structure with a footprint of approximately 32,500 square feet and is currently unoccupied. The secondary building is a 1 story structure that had a footprint of approximately 8,200 square feet until a recent fire reduced that area to approximately 5,000 square ?• feet. This building is currently occupied by a small automotive repair shop. The following are our �•. findings from the visual inspection of the main building. The Structural Report is attached to the end of this report. DBSER.VATCDA/S.'_"fly 1) The main building is a typical flat roof mill style structure with an " L " shaped configuration and a 1 story boiler building appendage located at the internal corner of the "L" . The majority of the building is 4 stories in height but there is also a 2 story and a 1 story section located to the south and a 1 story section located to the northwest. These lower sections appear to have been additions that were made to the main " L " shaped building over the years. The main building is wood frame construction with metal clapboard siding or transite shingle siding and a punched wood window pattern. The 1 story boiler building is brick construction with large linteled door openings and a few small arched windows., There is a chimney attached, consisting of a brick base and a tall metal stack. The 2 story section is CMU construction with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier to pier. The southern 1 story section is precast concrete construction, also with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier to pier. The 1 story section to the northwest is CMU construction, again, with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier to pier. See Photos 1 — 3, 5 — 8, 11 & 14. 2) While the basic building design and the subsequent additions are fairly typical of period mill buildings, they unfortunately have none of the wonderful architectural detailing also typical for those buildings of that period. There are no ornamental cornices, detailed window and door trim, water tables, cornerboards or other similar detailing typical of period mill building architecture. The brick boiler building does have stone lintels and brick arches at the door and window openings, however, Page 1 of 3 Aharonian 6 Associates,Inc.6 Blackstone Valley Place,Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 the detailing stops there. There is no differentiation in the brick coursing, quoins, corbelling, cornices or other similar brick detailing of the period. See Photos 1 - 3, 5 - 8, 11 & 14. • 3) The lack of any historical architectural significance aside, the overall physical condition of this structure is a major concern. The building is racked in several locations and appears to have significant structural and settlement issues. The exterior envelope of the main building and its additions are dilapidated and beyond repair. The metal siding is severely rusted, the transite shingles are falling off in several locations and the exterior walls are bulging at many locations due to the racking of the building structure. The CMU and precast concrete walls have major structural cracks and the built-up tar and gravel roofs are no longer viable systems. The brickwork is in very poor condition. The mortar joints are severely deteriorated, bricks have been displaced and have fallen out as have the brick arches over the windows. The windows are in poor condition or have failed completely as viable systems. See Photos 1 - 10,12, 13,15 & 16. 4) The interior of the building is in a similar state of disrepair. The structure and walls have sagged and settled. The concrete floor slabs and wood floors have heaved and settled. The wood stairways also have the same problems. Because the building envelope has deteriorated, there is a significant amount of water damage to both the building structure and its interior components. See Photos 17 - 38. 5) The existing heating, plumbing and electrical systems are outdated or have been cannibalized to the extent that they are no longer viable systems. The sprinkler main assembly has a few new components that are probably salvageable, such as the backflow preventers, but the distribution piping and sprinkler heads are old and the pipe sizes and head spacing pattern would not be appropriate for the proposed use. 6) Although a full code review has not been performed, it is readily apparent from this inspection that the building is also in gross violation of the current State Building, Fire, Life Safety • and Handicapped Accessibility Codes. Besides the obvious structural deficiencies which are addressed in the Structural section of this report, violations also include inadequate egress facilities, non-fire rated stairways and egress corridors, no fire separation assemblies between tenants and different use groups, inadequate finish material classifications for fire resistance requirements, inaccessible spaces and building systems (ADA) and generally hazardous conditions, just to list a very few. 7) See the attached Structural Report prepared by C. A. Pretier Associates Inc. for more specific and detailed observations relative to the structural integrity of this building. Based on the above observations and those contained in the attached Structural Report, we offer the following recommendations: 1) There is no section or element of the existing building that has any Architectural significance to the project or the community at large that would dictate that the entire building or any portion of the building be salvaged for adaptive reuse. 2) Given the overall deteriorated condition of the building's envelope, structural systems, mechanical and electrical systems, the extensive Code violations and the concern over building settlement issues, salvaging the building or any portion of the building for adaptive reuse would not be feasible nor practicable, either physically or financially. 3) Since it appears there are significant building settlement issues that need to be addressed, a • Geotechnical investigation should be performed to determine the viability of the soils relative to Report on the Architecture and Physical Condition of the Existing Building Page 2 of 3 Aharonian 8 Associates,Inc.6 Blackstone Valley Place, Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 bearing capacity, water table elevation and similar related issues to ensure that that proposed project could be properly constructed on this site. • 4) Therefore, we recommend that the entire existing building be demolished down to the existing foundation level and the proposed Mixed Use Development be built on top of the existing foundation footprint, assuming that the foundations and soil characteristics are suitable to accommodate this scope of work. REPORT � w s%# � ' 3 -� v d '�"' £� �'cx $ rarh✓}r i ,;t�' z �J'`,ya"��" s �� £ t. • Report on the Architecture and Physical Condition of the Existing Building Page 3 of 3 ASS o C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. 50 Freeway Drive, Cranston, R1 02920 �i STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS C.ANDREW PRETZER, PHD., P.E. DESIGN,CONSULTATION,INVESTIGATION MICHAEL J.GRAFE, P.E. THOMAS P. GRAFE, P.E. (401)785-2690 FAX(401)461-9360 DAVID GRANDPRE, P.E. email: mall@capretZeLCOm PETER W. GRAFE North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA File No. 204402.20 Structural Report/April 13, 2004 On March 24, 2004, Mr. Mark Humphrys from Aharonian & Associates, Inc., Architects, and I visited the referenced site. The purpose of our visit was to determine the condition of the building structure. This report will summarize our findings, as well as comment on the suitability of the building for reuse. Attachment 1 contains photos I took during our visit. GENERAL BUILDING DESCRIPTION The main part of the building is a four-story, wood-framed, "L"-shaped structure. The longer leg of the "L" runs east to west between the street on the west and the canal on the east. The shorter leg runs north, roughly parallel to the street. The columns and floor beams are constructed with heavy timber and the floors with tongue and groove wood plank. The walls are constructed with wood studs and wood sheathing and are generally sided with shingles and strip windows. See photos 1 through 16 for views of the entire building exterior. .- To the south of the longer leg of the main building is a two-story, steel-framed structure with masonry exterior walls and wood floor joists spanning between steel beams and columns. At the southwest corner of the main building is a one-story, cast-in-place concrete structure. There is another one-story structure with masonry exterior walls that rums along the east side of the shorter leg of the main building. Finally, there is a one-story brick structure with a wood- framed roof that extends out from the north side of the longer leg of the main building. BUILDING CONDITION Main Four-Story Structure The condition of the structure of the main four-story, "L"-shaped section of the building is poor. This is mainly because of problems related to settlement of the underlying soil. The first floor slab has cracked and settled throughout the building, in some places in excess of 1 foot, (see photo 17). Sections of the exterior foundation walls have cracked and settled to a lesser degree, (see photo 4). As a result, the upper floors are uneven and tilted. There are locations, especially on the upper floors, where water infiltration has caused deterioration of some of the structural wood members, (see photos 18 and 19). The entire shorter leg of the main building is racked as much as 1 foot out of plumb at the north end, again, due to differential settlement of the foundation from one side of the building to the other. The interior main columns are tilted, and the joints between the main framing members have opened up to accommodate the racking, (see photos 21, 22, and 23). The upper floors of the shorter leg are severely out of level, (see photos 24 and 25). Water infiltration has caused a roof beam and section of roof and fourth floor planking to,rot and sag, (see photos 26 and 27). C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal • Mill Building April 13, 2004 Page 2 The first floor of the shorter leg of the main building was covered with steel plates in some areas in an attempt to level the concrete floor. Water from the sprinkler main in the same location has caused the base of some of the wood columns to rot, (see photo 28). Two-Story Steel-Framed Structure The condition of the structure of the two-story section of the building is poor. The first floor slab is cracked and pitched due to settlement of the underlying soil of nearly 2 feet. A section of the first floor slab was cut away to reveal another slab 14 inches below. The lower slab had been filled over to accommodate settlement, and the newer slab continues to settle, (see photo 29). The tops of the main center steel columns have been shimmed about 10 inches. Even so, they have settled an additional foot, causing the second floor and roof structure to be severely out of level, (see photos 30, 31, and 32). Rusting reinforcing steel has caused all of the exterior concrete lintels to crack, and in some cases, fail, (see photo 9). There are numerous cracks in the masonry blocks, especially near the roof line, (see photo 33). •- One-Stogy Concrete Structure The structure of the one-story, cast-in-place concrete section of the building is in poor condition. There are numerous exposed and rusted reinforcing bars on the exterior where concrete has spalled off, (see photos 11, 12, and 13). Settlement and cracking of the floor make it difficult to walk in the building without tripping. The roof structure along the west side has slid an inch or so to the east and is hardly bearing on the west wall, (see photo 34). One-Story Masonry Structure The exterior walls of the one-story section of the building along the east side of the short leg of the main section have numerous open cracks, (see photo 36). The roof has sagged. I expect the roof was not designed to support snowdrift from the adjacent four-story main building section. One-Story Brick Structure The one-story brick structure is in very poor condition. Mortar joints have deteriorated to the point that bricks have started to fall to the ground, (see photos 15 and 16). The wood roof framing members are severely rotted. The center of the roof has been shored up with steel posts and a beam to prevent it from collapsing, (see photos 37 and 38). C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal Mill Building • April 13, 2004 Page 3 SUMMARY All sections of the building structure have been significantly affected by settlement of the underlying soil, and to a lesser degree by wear and tear and water infiltration. Even the best portions of the building are out of plumb and in poor condition. It is my professional opinion that none of the building structure is suitable for rehabilitation and reuse. It would be my recommendation to remove the building super-structure in its entirety. Reuse of the existing foundation or even a new foundation should be considered only after a geotechnical investigation of the underlying soil is performed. C. A. PRRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas P. Grafe, P. . • Vice President Enc.(l): Attachment 1 —Photos taken March 24, 2004, by TPG t C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal • Mill Building April 13, 2004 Attachment 1 —Photos taken March 24, 2004,by TPG y r - orth River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA rCAPA 204402.20 5�.<a A _ • Fiji \ a. r r _ X11 ;� w� .� • . • - .�� ryryrI 1 ei[ I r n • . . North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • r, CAPA 204402.20 Y 1 E Y Photo 4 ji; � i Open foundation crack at southeast corner of building shown in photo 3. YY,Y 3�• u Y t ll � §♦ �'. Z .ail .. ,� Photo 5 East elevation of the shorter leg of the main building section. _ 3 y 1 1 North River Canal �� V; e Building ddL I, Salem, MA ��E� •1�� .�+` or E CAPA 204402.20 �� e w a �♦ , Ate. � 1 • � uf� I I • I i SII II� "111 •1 • , - l p k y e q 91 .y s North River Canal Mill Building • r' Salem MA CAPA 204402.20 Photo 9 Cracked and failed concrete �=* lintels on exterior of two- _ story building section. i n ' Photo 10 • y`��', Cracked masonry on exterior @ -= of two-story building section. I / 71- I p - '_ Photo 11 z = One-story cast-in-place concrete building section at southwest corner of main building section. North River Canal Mill Building • _ _ .= Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 C4 1 A * Photo 12 Cracked and spalled concrete on exterior of building section shown in photo 11. r Y x T f V Photo 13 4 E Open crack and bowed wall of building section shown in photo 11. 1 Photo ]4 One-story brick building. / North River Canal .,r "' Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 Photo 15 Cracks and missing bricks on exterior of one-story brick building. 1� • Photo 16 AJ-- Cracks and missing bricks on exterior arch of one-story brick building. F.� t Photo 17 Cracked and severely settled a concrete slab on first floor in main section of the building. S Td c ` - F • 1 i � e ow it A \ y/y{� t� �`''�1 11 I' 1� I1 T�� 5� • • • • I�kl IL 1 '' f�r• �a'1i. mss;, f+ 9Y 1\ :. North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • — CAPA 204402.20 Photo 20 31 Tilted first floor column in f` shorter leg of main building section, due to racking of the building. � r 41 it d4 > r i ..i 1 �• - 5 " Photo 21 = -- Separation of beam hanger due to racking of shorter leg " of main building section. t�. ,= North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • _\ ""'� l ;, CAPA 204402.20 Photo 22 9 Separation of joints in the wood framing due to rack- ' ing of shorter leg of main ?. building section.g [ J �Ali ` t t. f Photo 23 Racking of shorter leg of F r � r main building section has nearly pulled the floor beam off the supporting column. 1 V * s r North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 • ` 1 f - Photo 24 ri ` Sagging second floor in shorter leg of main building section. a j, 0 o e a j Photo 25 }- a Sagging second floor in shorter leg of main building section. 7 • North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 26 Rotted section of roof beam and plank in shorter leg of s main building section. 1 ` . Photo 27 Close-up view of rotted roof beam and plank shown in photo 26. f ` North River Canal r ' Mill Building = {t Salem, MA 1 CAPA 204402.20 ,i Photo 28 Base of first floor column rotted by water from sprinkler main in shorter leg of main building section. 1 . F , 5r Photo 2 s /rtt a + Y Settled slab-on-grade in the two-story building section. Note original slab had settled before it was covered with crushed stone and a second slab placed. Photo 30 9 inches of shims on top of the first floor column in the two-story building section. 1�. fe North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 n, e _ z Photo 31 Sagging roof steel in two- story building section, where the center columns have ! settled. ! Y T r� Photo 32 Steel connections have pulled apart at center columns shown in photo 31. a ,1 l North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 33 Large open cracks in the wall of the two-story building. • 1 F 4 F t Photo 34 " Roof slab has nearly pulled off the support column in the one-story concrete section of ;y Y the building. l r/ t '1 North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA a CAPA 204402.20 Photo 35 Severely settled slab in the one-story concrete section of the building. v ;• 1 js v •� i 4� r '+'4 ` Photo 36 " Cracks in the exterior masonry walls of the one- {y 5 U story building section on the east side of the smaller leg of Ko_V ` °, the main building section. �� 1 I North River Canal Mill ing Salem, MA CAPA " ,0 Photo 37 Severely rotted wood roof frain the one-story ming brick building section.w rte, �-,-4-=• _;� ' 1 -F. Photo 111 roof framing in the one-story brick building section, held up by a steel beam and columns. e1 , r ppd I + s7..G+.'s.r,/,• s,., s sx•T,.ss a ;w -.'4.�ry s".� ••..•:'i;:::.5:.:.:.:•:•: aw' - °. '_- .__ — , ;s ■ 'ww e i e s z s s. ■ ■ s rCi.ew ■ z hi s z S �� .tist�°> ■ ■ �^ ° ■ ■ ��aa■ ■I ■ �~ ■ ■ ■ ■ .��C�■ � ��r�i.l.��rw�� ,r� . p r �� C� �. p � � I■a I ■ � : � I; ;E s{Gl1 t..y�iii'3 a�"y �iF! !.�i sehi�ii°s t.l;E 3is A�{i.Fi:r.•a• �.._ .:,. z z h� . y i r .. � s� :> � ,, � ,. _. , ai■u.n�rr—r ii ii ii _. ._ - ii its—�!�-- --� � I I _ I III �IaI . I III ' ■ Imill �I (-� � I ■ . Ilhh ■�■ IIII ,. ■1■ MIN I��-_0 1 __��I�.I■ I� _ _ � _��. r = _Q �I�■I■ �� ■I�;■ _ I ,.. �?•;-�.. �IIIIIII-� O � `� =;V—UI—C'°� �=V��J �i�`' I= —C+' .� �_0�1j1�1� dµ � �c:`Vsr`i:. �- . wlr:i�; . f yr [�] ....... ............ ............ q ..... ... ..... = ......... nmm��nunneeveQ.ummnv,■l•Ji. r :.umnmmiiiin0v nnnnn. f r�'v:mnnm venom venvn. r.: s ';a _ ;11:1 Ivmnne�r ilievn..e annnn�ravn.r:vm'•i', f 4y�:aannnmimmnmvrnvmen-t �I T,M �� ■. -•��_�slGi�n ■ ..L`— . � ss . i .�' i� i � � a � �1 ark■irj�:. -- yt•.i-0•is b�.iF a:: G:g. F+fvs IMEE= `WINE,w,•A• i d it$rtitzrs , -- •zwi� ' W �■ � ■. r£�Ss � S . xsu � ■ ■. tt1=1�'•�•°*w5'*w _ ... _ �t�wo-z�• - t v�sriww,a" y ■ s"��.��s6'�F s 's y-e'ys �. i _ �..} ,, _I■� ��'� I•I �■�■ •I-111.1■III=I.1I �■�■� L.� ., �� "�� I-- -� --� � I� - I .I.II •�'��` , =0 0 0 0 o I I'-o 0 0 l iilill Vii . :::. eee::Ae—®—moo u n o oEr ,v TURN®I®I®I®011 m IF . i aQ I.9F NOTES: NORTH RIR CANAL 513.52.4YE 4133 . 1. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED E 69.70' SITE LIGHTING 815.49'00' _ . 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS 6ASp, 3. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE e o°� CONDITIONS OF A VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE SALEM,. 90 5's Ow1 MASSACHUSETTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ON ID Mm Em OCTOBER 17, 2006. oumps FA PAD 4. PROPOSED LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF INDICATED r IMPROVEMENT. 5. ALL DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 6. PARKING SPACE STRIPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED `41TH WHITE o° REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT. bZONE o e I 100 F80 NDAR K f-A•a/-fVrnXC pLWlrt wNi y •P • b ,_y' WIx mawogn cv ca ccAaos � ' i 4 � _ . 1aallal ca awwcs as � _ d ID•HOE817IMPIMS - j t d wNxWAwar - POSI Mnf W! GN15 ; I9' SO' IV 7 IV I YL IY - i Wj 0- N N JV� — • U ,y � fr 'xwn IVERFRON T 7 IIo`yp m D l�Y 3 6 g sIm um c q I NOTE: HORIZO!e, ,. Lq$N 4Tq 61g1Y�pM1 „ • i� HDAL DESIGN TAKEN CI LAGRASSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLANSJOSEPH H OEIIR161w615 T Nz �� SIGN 6 R.TA6/61,YSb5 .61ry9E5s 5' G�O KIOSK O; 1 �� / / D,x SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN I 9lCA wEfA w SaE a 5'-6 \� r Ivo,', �I� ,,. I 51'-5-: NORTH RIVER CONDOMINIUM 'e'oo• rw • s5 smaemml R,,L w O l t i� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DONS AlK AMPSPUANT OF Boy 4CI0N w4%°"` a I` 'i 26.56• SITE LAYOUT PLAN AT p OAA'I M T 'las - 1 N0826'16'W Rll•ES >F RB NO?yg'20'E N05 Y40' ! — NEW SDEWAD( 1 4.84' 1 .� PWuwc $PACES I Prepared Fw Prepared By. Etsnxc y09'0' North nnin Cx, St. nlum, LLC Eastern Lend Survey Assoc. Inc Nns6'20 W 282 Bennington St. Christopher R. Mello ALS ,p East Boston MA 02128 104 Lowell SSPe Boid21 MA 01960 SCALE 20' ?' GOODHUE STREET �t w 0 10 20 40 60 a DA 7E F 13879 JANUARY IA 2006 Car °j MNIo iJ1] SNEET INOREN90NS 1. MARCH 22 2006 (`