50 FORT AVENUE - STREET FILE Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs •.,,
' Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) OfficeRECI IV
' Environmental Notification Form Nov 012013 -
For
1 ?013 __
Ice Use Only BOARD pF NEkT
EEA# y
MEPA Analyst:
_------
---
' The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document
electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301CMR 11.00.
' Project Name: Contract 1_3,'1 Marblehead Pipeline ReplacementP_roject--J
Street Address` � 50 Fort Avenue J"
' Munici alit ; Salem' Watershed: Salem Harbor
Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates Latitue:421 31, 43.17,,N
Long!I tude: 70° 52' 26.28"W
Estimated commencement date: Dec. 2013 Estimated completion date;_ May 2014
Project.T' e:.,Sewer_re lacement— Status of 'Meet desi n: 60 %complete
Proponent: South,Essex Sewerage_District—Attn:Alan'F:Taubert Jr.;PES
' • Street Address: 50 Fort Avenuef
Municipality: Salem State: MA Zip Code:01970
Name of Contact Person: -Rachel J. Burckardt.PE
' Firm/A en Parsons Brinckerhoff Street Address: 75 Arlington:Street
Munici ali : Boston I State: MA Zi ,Code: 02116
Phone: 617-426-7330 Fax: 617-482-8487 E-maik
' burckardt' " bwdrltl.com
Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)?
' [--]Yes ®No
If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 301 CMR 11.08(7)) or a
' Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting:
a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.08(8)) ❑Yes ®No
' a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 19.09) ❑Yes ®No
a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ®No
a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ZNo
(Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF:)
Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed(see 301 CMR 11.03)?
301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)3. Dredging of 10,000 or more cy of material
' Estimated quantity for this project: 39.000 cy
i;
301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)l.f. alteration of one half or more acres of any other wetlands.
Estimated quantity for this project: 3.71 acres of temporary alteration of Land Under the
Ocean for trench : about`?44 acres ofteimporary alteration of Land Under'the ocean for
the areas where sidecast material from the dredged trench will be temporarily deposited.
Effective January 2011
Which State Agency Permits will the project require?
Water Ouality Certification
' Coastal Zone Management Consistency Review
Chapter 91 License/Permit
-order of Conditions Under Iylassaehuseits'Wetlands"Protection Actt aarblehead Cortseruatian.
Commission)
' Order of Coriditiorts Under Massachusetts WetlandsProttion Act(Salhm.Conseryatian'Commission)
-Massachusetts Historical Commission Permit
Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth,
' including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres:
SESD i ' "" i to""the M t iisetts DRP,for- istance"uti ier tf ie State Revol :in " F 44
Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total
1 & Environmental Impacts
Total site acreage 11.66 acres(1)
(1)11.86=11.15
subOdal acres+0.46
intertidal acres+0.25
Buffer zone acres
New acres of land altered u
' Acres of impervious area q o" o I
Square feet of new bordering °
' vegetated wetlands alteration
Square feet of new other wetland 485,000 temp.
alteration-Land
alteration Under the Ocean
Acres of new non-water dependent
use of tidelands or waterways °
Gross square footage 0 N/A NSA
Number of housing units ° Nin "A
Maximum height(feet) "^ NIA NIA l
TRANSPORTATION
Vehicle trips per day o 0 a;
Parking spaces o 0 0
WASTEWATER
' Water Use (Gallons per day) ° r23
Water withdrawal (GPD) 0 0 I
Wastewater generation/treatment 0 0 ('
' (GPD)
a Length of water mains (miles) 0 0 j
I Length of.sewer mains (miles) 2.3
2.3 ;us,
-2-
Has this project been filed with MEPA before?
Yes (EEA# ) ®No
Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before?
❑ Yes (EEA# ) ®No
' GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION -all proponents must fill out this section
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Describe the existing conditions and landuses on the project site:_
1�e pproi ct existing site consists of twinsubaoueous sewer glpeh as that carry'all sanitary sewerage:
from the Town of Marblehead under Salem Harborto theSouth:EssaxSeweraae Qistnot wastewater;
' reatrnentpfant in Salern Tie twin pipes run from a•valve chamber in Marblehead to a valve chamber in:
Salem at li actin#to the SESD facilAty_On the Mdarblehead sine the xstinp land use is axis#ing"Qistrict
Ea_seq pglrbally located in Stramski Park. On the Salam side.the existi i.land use"is"the
SESD treatment facility.
' Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements:
Refer to Attachment A.
NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project's direct and indirect impacts
(including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent; duration
and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements
of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these
requirements into the future.
' Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered
by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning,
and the reasons(s)that they were not selected as the preferred alternative:
' Alternatives considered include:
-RenaJdha pipeiT nrarg not fassible given fhe tisk of damaeinc`the pipe and causing theleakaoe
of raw seweraoe into Salem Harbor.
Re pacing oipe ipplace- not feasibleto reol6ceflna"gI immedMUt g-,a 'acentto the'corroded existinb.
oipe without tha risk of'damaaino the pjpe"and ca s' a tha IgaJ4aga of rsvi"sewerage into Salem Harbor.
Trrxx*hj@gs mathods such as elitectiorial ddflina• reie"r':teii due toladc"of suf Jddnt soac-'e on.
' Salent and Marblehead shorelines that'wouid be necessary for constructiom
NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters
and/or siting of a project, or components thereof, will have on the environment, keeping in mind that
' the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the
greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations,
alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations.
' Summarize the mitigation measures proposed to offset the impacts of the preferredalternative:
noliaan pr000surg turbiairy bo6ir,s rnonitoring and silt curtains during the in-water work to minimizd
r�pparts and aniiariating that further resource mitigation wi9t"not tie nsary Tha route selegted is fhe rriost
-3_
' feasj mute khat is as close as oosgibe to the existibi3 pi nes route sb'as not to adv`ers6V affgt the,_
gxiating�ibelines during'constrriGhon So'fhe rmparffa have been avoidetf fb fhe sireatesk degnp oossible -
e'appiioant�cdntendi`that'eiKdt the'material being eiicavated and'side cast�idiil ! replaced back into the':
tre' e'�R PXcavated from it is go that the excavated area and the areas affectedW the sidgSWina
wil Tatum naturaliy to its ore-construction condition and no aouatic resource"'areas wiii'bg adversely affected'
For wo "n the shoreline areas the applicant will implement a tr +ah dewaterino Dian erosion and`
se+ en+b+on controls kurbid 'booms momtodi and restoration Existing rdek armorwill be removed and
when replaced anile gporeiines restoredto ore construction grades with send landsca ing materials and
rook annbr'as rebuiraef the shorekne and pgiand areas will imOlament erosion control measures and'will be'
. gyred to'ora construction n2htrons'afthe caftciusion of the griect
' If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase;,
AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN:..
' Is the project within or adjacent town Area of Critical Environmental Concern?
❑Yes(Specify )
®No
if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan?_Yes _No;
' If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan.
Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC?_Yes _No;
' If yes, describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoffidischarge to the designated ACEC.
RARE SPECIES:
' hoes the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species? (see
http:Uwww.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/prionty_habitat_home.htm)
DYes (Specify ) RNo
' HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place
or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth?
' DYes (Specify ) ®No
If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic
or archaeological resources? DYes (Specify ) ❑No
' WATER RESOURCES:
Is there an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? _Yes X No;
if yes, identify the ORW and its location,
' (NOTE: Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies, their tributaries, and bordering
wetlands, active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP,,certain waters within Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern, and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the
' Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.)
Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? Yes X No; if yes,
identify the water body and pollutant(s) causing the impairment:,,--
Is the project within a medium or high stress basin, as established by the Massachusetts
Water Resources Commission?_Yes X No
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT:
Generally describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply
with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations: N/A
-4-
' MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY_PLAN:
,
Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan?
Yes _No X ; if yes;please describe the current status of the site(including Release Tracking Number(RTN),cle,
i ' Action Outcome classification);
Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL)on any portion of the project site?Yes—No X ;
if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL:,
Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN?
Yes _No X ; if yes, please describe:
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE:
' If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction, describe alternatives considered
for re-use, recycling, and disposal of,e.g., asphalt, brick; concrete, gypsum, metal, wood: N/A
(NOTE:Asphalt pavement, brick, concrete and metal are banned from disposal at Massachusetts
landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills.
' See 310 CMR 49.017 for the complete list of banned materials.)
Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials?Yes No X
if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at http://mass.gov/MassDEP/air/asbhom0l.htm
Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment: N/A
DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER:
Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally
designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated Scenic River?Yes_No –x—;
if yes,specify name of river and designation:
If yes, does the project have the potential to impact any of the"outstandingly remarkable"
resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River?
' Yes No _x_; if yes, specify name of river and designation:
if yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated"outstandingly remarkable"
resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River.
Yes No
if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the"outstandingly remarkable" resources or
stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed.
' ATTACHMENTS:
1. List of all attachments to this document.
2. U.S.G.S. map(good quality color copy, 8-'%x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000)
indicating the project location and boundaries.
' 3.. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate
environs, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, railroad rights-of-way,
wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and
major utilities.
4 Plan, at an appropriate scale, depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the
project site such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species, Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern, Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas, Article 97 lands,
wetland resource area delineations, water supply protection areas, and historic resources
and/or districts.
5. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project (if
construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing
conditions upon the completion of each phase).
6. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance
with 301 CMR 11.16(2).
' 7. List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable.
The listing of all Attachments Provided is included at rear of this form..
I '
' LAND SECTION —all proponents must fill out this section
L Thresholds/Permits
A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1)
_Yes_X No; if yes,specify each threshold:
It. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows:
Existing Chance Total
Footprint of buildings 0 0 0
Internal roadways 0 0 0
Parking and other paved areas 0 0 0
'. Other altered areas 0 0 0
Undeveloped areas 11.86_ ,_tom_, 11:86.
Total: Project Site Acreage 11.86:- 0 11.86'
' B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years?
Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use(with prime state or
locally important agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use?
' C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use?
Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and
indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by
' the Department of Conservation and Recreation:
D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in
accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to
' any purpose not in accordance with Article 97?—Yes X No; if yes, describe:
E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation
' restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?
_Yes X No; if yes,does the project involve the release or modification of such
restriction? Yes No; if yes, describe:
F. Does the project require approval of anew urban redevelopment projector a fundamental change
in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? Yes X No; if yes,
describe:
' G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an
existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B?Yes—No X Jf yes, describe:
Ill. Consistency
A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan
Title: N/A Date
B. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to:
1) economic development _ N/A
2) adequacy of infrastructure N/A.
' 3) open space impacts N/A
4) compatibility with adjacent land uses N/A
C. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency (RPA)
' RPA6
Title: N/A Date.. N/A
_6_
' D. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to:
' 1) economic development N!A
2) adequacy of infrastructure WA
3) open space impacts N/A
1
1
1
P
RARE SPECIES SECTION.
' I. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat(see
301 CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes_X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
(NOTE: If you are uncertain, it recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and
Endangered Species Program (NHESP)prior to submitting the ENF.)
B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species orhabitat? _Yes_ X No
C. Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat(Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the
' current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? —Yes X No.
D. If you answered"No"to all questions A,B and C, proceed to the Wetlands,Waterways, and
Tidelands Section. If you answered"Yes"to ei hequestion A or question B,fill out the
remainder of the Rare Species section below.
II. Impacts and Permits
' A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural
Heritage Atlas(attach:relevant page)? Yes_No. If yes,
1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and
Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? _Yes_No; if yes,have you received a
' determination as to whether the project will result in the"take°of a rare species? _
Yes No; if yes, attach the letter of determination to this submission.
2. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in
accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 70.04)? _Yes_No; if yes, provide
a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts
3. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat?
4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts
Endangered Species Act? _Yes—No
4. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an
Order of Conditions for this project? Yes_No; if yes, did you send a copy of the
Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance
' with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? Yes_No
B. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in
accordance with M.G.L. c.1'31A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? —Yes No; if yes,
provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant
habitat:
_g_
' WETLANDS WATERWAYS AND TIDELANDS SECTION
' 1. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands,waterways, and
tidelands(see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? X Yes_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
' 30f CMR 11 03,3)(b) V.-- alteration of one hilt or more acres of arty oilier wetlands.
Prolectwo �Lemlooradly moot approximately 11 16 acres of,l.and Underthe Oeeam,
B. Does the project require any state permits(or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands,
waterways,or tidelands? X Yes_No; if yes, specify which permit:
' Water Quality Certification
Coastal Zone Management Consistency Review
-Chapter 91 License/Permit
-Order of Condifion's Under Mi smkhusetts N/etiarids Protection Act (Mkiblehead Conservation
Commission)
-Orderof Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protectipn Act(Salem Gonsentatio2CbmLnissionl.
-Massachusetts Historical Commission Permit
' C. If you answered"No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you
answered"Yes"to ei her question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wetlands,
Waterways, and Tidelands Section below.
' IL Wetlands Impacts and Permits
A. Does the project require anew or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection
Act (M.G.L.c.131A)? X Yes_ No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed?(pending)Yes
_No; if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number. (pending); if yes, has a local Order of
Conditions been issued? Yes X No;Was the Order of Conditions appealed? _Yes .
No. Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations?_Yes X No.
B. Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on
the project site: See Attachment A. E
' C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and
indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent:
Coastal Wetlands Area (square feet)or Temporary or
Length (linear feet) Permanent Impact?
Land Under the Ocean 485 000sf Temporary
Designated Port Areas
Coastal Beaches 21 500 sf(1) Temporary
Coastal Dunes
Barrier Beaches
Coastal Banks 162 If Temoorary
Rocky Intertidal Shores
Salt Marshes
Land Under Salt Ponds
Land Containing Shellfish
Fish Runs
Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 10.800 SF TemooraQK
' '(1)20,000sf intertidal beach +1500 sf beach above MHW)
Inland Wetlands
Bank (If) ,
9
' Bordering Vegetated Wetlands
Isolated Vegetated Wetlands
Land under Water
Isolated Land Subject to Flooding
Borderi ng Land Subject to Flooding
' Riverfront Area
D. Is any part of the project:
i ' 1. proposedas a limited project? _Yes X No; if yes,what is the area (in sf)?_
2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _Yes X No; if yes, describe:
3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? —Yes X No
4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? X Yes_No, if yes, describe the volume of
dredged material and the proposed disposal site:
39 060 cubic yards to betamoorarlly sidecasted`and then backfilled into the Dips t'renah.
5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW) or an Area of Critical
Environmental Concern(ACEC)? _Yes X No
6. subject to wetlands restriction order? Yes X No; N yes, identify the area(in so:
7. located in buffer zones? X Yes_No; if yes; how much (in so
10.800 sf(Salem-plus.Marblehead side).,
' E. Will the project:
1.. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes_No
2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law? _Yes X No; if
yes,what is the area (so?
III.Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits
A. Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands(including filled former tidelands) that are
subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? X Yes No;
if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the project site?
' Yes X No; if yes, list the date and license or permit number and provide a copy of
the historic map used to determine extent of filled tidelands:
B. Does the project require anew or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91? X Yes_No;
if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water-dependent
use? Current 0 Change 0 Total 0
If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures(in so?
C. For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following:' NIA
Area of filled tidelands on the site:
Area of filled tidelands covered by buildings:
' For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use:
Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands?
Yes No
Height of building on filled tidelands
Also show the following on a site plan: Mean High Water, Mean Low Water, Water-
dependent Use Zone, location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and
exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low
water marks.
' D. Is the project located on landlocked tidelands? _Yes x No; if yes, describe the project's
- to-
1
impact on the public's right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe
measures the project will implement to avoid,minimize or mitigate any adverse impact:
E. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a
municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations?_Yes
x No; if yes, describe the project's impact on groundwater levels and describe
measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact:
F. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or
tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory'EIR?_Yes x No;
(NOTE:If yes, then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and
Determination.)
G. Does the project include dredging? X Yes No; if yes, answer the following questions:
What type of dredging? Improvement Maintenance X_ Both_
What is the proposeddredge volume, in cubic yards(cys)39.000
' What is the proposed dredge footprint_6.000 length (ft) 27 width(ft)at top of
trapezoidal trench_9 depth (ft)typical, deeper in Federal Channel, see detail on plans;
Will dredging impact the following resource areas?
Intertidal Yes x No_; if yes,20.000 sq ft
' Outstanding Resource Waters Yes No X ; if yes,_sq ft
Other resource area(i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds) Yes_ No X ; if yes
sq ft (Note: eel crass survey is to be performed)
' If yes to any of the above, have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps
to: 1) avoidance;2)if avoidance is not possible, minimization; 3)if either
avoidance or minimize is not possible,mitigation?
If no to any of the above, what information or documentation was used to support
this determination?See Attachments A. E
Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in
accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b). Physical and chemical data of the
sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis. See Attachment C
Sediment Characterization
Existing gradation analysis results? X Yes—No: if yes,provide results.
See Attachment C
Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6?
X Yes_No; if yes, provide results See Attachment C.
Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management
options for dredged sediment? If yes, check the appropriate option.
r)re'ged Sediment wili be used to backfill ine replacement bench no offsite disoosal
is anticipated.
Beach Nourishment_
Unconfined Ocean Disposal_
Confined Disposal:
Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD)
Confined Disposal Facility (CDF)_
Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001
' Shoreline Placement
Upland Material Reuse_
In-State landfill disposal_
Out-of-state landfill disposal
(NOTE: This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.)
IV. Consistency:
A. Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located
within the Coastal Zone? X Yes No; if yes, describe these effects and the projects
consistency with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management:
See Attachment D
B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? X Yes No; if
' yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan:
Salem Hor,Plen,(�antiary 20011, thegroiecfis oonsisterit with the.Sal@m Harbor Plan in that it
will Crave arbnb nedatiWe+ dact to hartxir olanning. the pect.has'an indirectimnac#irnthatfnsfaliafi6n
of tfite replacement r�icetines will maintain the eiivironmentai"conditions that make Salem Harbora;.
' popular recreational harbor.
The town of Marblehead has not published a Harbor Plan document
1
1
' -12-
WATER SUPPLY SECTION
1. Thresholds l Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply(see 301 CMR
11.03(4))? Yes X No; if yes, specify; in quantitative terms:
' B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes X_No; if yes,
specify which permit:
' C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. tf you
answered"Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section
below.
II. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe, in gallons per day (gpd), the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed
activities at the project site:
' Existing Chance Total
Municipal or regional water supply
Withdrawal from groundwater
Withdrawal from surface water
' Interbasin transfer
(NOTE: interbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed
1 water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater
from the source will be discharged.)
B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply,.has the municipality or region indicated that there
' is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project?_Yes-No
C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water
' source, has a pumping test been conducted? Yes_No; if yes, attach a map of the drilling
sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results.
D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source(in gallons per
day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?_Yes _No; if yes,then how „
much of an increase(gpd)?
E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility,
water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility?
Yes No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site:
Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total
Flow, Daily Flow
Capacity of water supply well(s) (gpd)
Capacity of water treatment plant (gpd)
' F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the
direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed?
' G. Does the project involve:
1. new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of
the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district? _Yes_No
' 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _Yes_No; if yes, now many acres of
alteration?
3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking
' water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _Yes_No
- 13-
' III. Consistency
Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water
resources, quality,facilities and services:
a
' 14
1
1
WASTEWATER SECTION
1. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR
11:03(5))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes X No; if yes,
specify which permit:
1 C. If you answered"No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic
Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder
of the Wastewater Section below.
' IL Impacts and Permits
A. Describe the volume(in gallons per day) and type of disposal of wastewater generation for
existing and proposed activities at the project site(calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic
systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems):
Existing Chanae Total
Discharge of sanitary wastewater
Discharge of industrial wastewater
1 TOTAL
iin Change Total
Discharge to groundwater
Discharge to outstanding resource water
Discharge to surface water
Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater
facility
TOTAL
' B. Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity? Yes No; if yes,then describe
the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows:
C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity?_Yes_No; if
yes,then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows:
D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other
wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? X Yes
No; if yes, describe as follows:
Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total
Daily Flow
Wastewater treatment plant capacity
' (in gallons per day)
E. If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the
direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new?
(NOTE: Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater
will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is
- 15-
located.)
' F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water.Resources Authority
(MWRA) or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district?_Yes_No
' G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage,
treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge,sludge ash, grit, screenings;
' wastewater reuse (gray water)or other sewage residual materials? Yes_No; if yes, what is
the capacity(tons per day):
Existin Change Total
Storage
Treatment
Processing
' Combustion
Disposal
H. Describe the water conservation measures to be undertaken by the project, and other
' wastewater mitigation, such as infiltration and inflow removal.
Ill.Consistency
' A. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state,regional, and
local plans and policies related to wastewater management:
B. If the project requires a sewer extension permit;is that extension included in a`comprehensive
' wastewater management plan? _Yes_No;if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan
and whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that
plan:
1
' -16-
r
1
TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION)
1. Thresholds/Permit
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR
11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways?
_Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit:
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other
Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered"Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out
the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below.
t II.Traffic Impacts and Permits
A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site:
E i�c sting Change Total
' Number of parking spaces _0—
Number of vehicle trips per day
ITE Land Use Code(s): _0,
' B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site?
Roadway Existing Change Total
1. .
' 3.
' C. If applicable, describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways that the
project proponent will implement:
' D. How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities
and services to provide access to and from the project site?
C. Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA)that provides transportation demand
' management(TDM) services in the area of the project site? _Yes_No; if yes, describe
if and how will the project will participate in the TMA:
D. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation
' facilities?—Yes_No; if yes, generally describe:
E. If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a
Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CMR 111.7)and a Notice
' of Proposed IConstruction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
(CFR Title 14 Part 77.13,forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)?
'
Ill. Consistency
Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state,and federal
plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and
services:
1
-17-
' TRANSPORTATICIN SigenON fRIJAI WAYS AN1 OTHEIkTRANSPORTATION
' FACILITIES)
L Thresholds
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other
' transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative
terms:
' B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation
facilities? Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit:
C. If you answered"No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you
' answered''Yes"to either question or question B,fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section
below.
II.Transportation Facility Impacts
' A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project
site:
' B. Will the project involve any
1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)?
2. Cutting of Jiving public shade trees (number)?
' 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)?
III.Consistency-Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans
and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services,
' including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation
Improvements Plan (TIP),the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan:
1
' - Is-
ENERGY SECTION
' I. Thresholds/Permits
A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11:03(7))?
Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
' B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes X No; if yes, specify
which permit:
t C. If you answered"No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you
answered"Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Energy Section
below.
' II. Impacts and Permits
A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site:
' Existin Chance Total
Capacity of electric generating facility(megawatts)
Length of fuel line (in miles)
' Length of transmission lines(in miles)
Capacity of transmission lines(in kilovolts)
B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are:
' 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)?
2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)?
C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new,
' unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes No; if yes, please describe:
D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services:
' III. Consistency
Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for
enhancing energy facilities and services:
' - 19-
AIR QUALITY SECTION
1 I. Thresholds
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR
11.03(8))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
' B. Does the project require any state,permits.related to air quality? _Yes X No; if yes,
specify which permit:
' C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste
Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air
Quality Section below.
'
It. Impacts and Permits
A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR
7.00, Appendix A)?_Yes_No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons
per day)of:
Existing Chance Total
Particulate matter
Carbon monoxide
Sulfur dioxide
Volatile organic compounds
Oxides of nitrogen
Lead
Any hazardous air pollutant
Carbon dioxide
B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts:
' III. Consistency
A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan:
' B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and
local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality:
' 20
' SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION
I. Thresholds/Permits
A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste(see
' 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:
B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste?
'
—Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit:
C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological
Resources Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the
' remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below.
II. Impacts and Permits
A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing,
' combustion or disposal of solid waste?_Yes_X_No; if yes, what is the volume(in tons per day)
of the capacity:
Exis in Chance Total
' Storage
Treatment, processing
Combustion
Disposal
' B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling,treatment or
disposal of hazardous waste?_Yes_X_No; if yes, what is the volume(in tons or gallons per
day) of the capacity:
' Exis in Change Total
Storage
Recycling
Treatment
Disposal
C. If the project will generate solid waste(for example, during demolition or construction), describe
alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal:
D. If the project involves demolition, downy buildings to be demolished contain asbestos?
' Yes No
E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts(including indirect impacts);.
Ill. Consistency
Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan:
21
HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION
I. Thresholds/impacts
A. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? X Yes No; if yes,
attach correspondence. For project sites involving lands under water, have you consultedwith the
' Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources? X Yes No; if yes, attach
correspondence
See Attachment H for correspondence from MHC.
The District is in the,prodeft of Mainmri services to ver#or rf tha arohaeoTo6ical'survey
B. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either
case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological
Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all
or any exterior part of such historic structure? —Yes X No; if yes, please describe:
' C. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places
or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? Yes X No; if
yes; does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site?
_Yes_No; if yes, please describe:
' D. If you answered"No" to all parts of both questions A, B and C,proceed to the Attachments and
Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes"to any part of either question A or question B,fill out
the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below.
II. Impacts
Describe and assess the project's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and
archaeological resources:
' III.Consistency
Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and
local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources:
The District is in therprocess of"retaininzservices to perform the archaeological survey
' 22
CERTIFICATIONS:
1 The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following
newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1):
' (Name) Salem News (Date)_Nov. 6, 2013
' 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2).
Signatures:.
,Jr
Date Signature of Responsible Officer Date Signature of person preparing
or Proponent NPC ENF (if differentfrom above)
' Alan F. Taubert.Jr'...PE. Rachel J Burckardt. PE
Name (print or type) Name (print or type)
' South Essex Sewerage District Parsons Brinckerhoff
Firm/Agency Firm/Agency
50 Fort Avenue 75 Arlington Street
Street Street
' Salem MA 01.970 Boston MA 02116
Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip
' 978 744 4550 __ ext. 127 617-426-7330.
Phone Phone
23
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
' Attachment A Project Narrative
' Attachment'B USGS MAP
Attachment C Sediment Grain Size and Chemical Analysis
Attachment D Coastal Zone Management Consistency Review
' Attachment E Plans
Attachment F List of Permits and Reviews
Attachment G Circulation List of Agencies
Attachment H Correspondence with MHC
' 24
' ATTACHMENT A
' PROJECT NARRATIVE
1
1
' Marblehead Pipeline Replacement Project
South Essex Sewerage District
' October 23,2013
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
PROJECT NARRATIVE
' BASIS FOR REPLACEMENT RECOMMENDATION
The Conditions Assessment performed by Parsons Brinckerhoff(PB) has identified severe
corrosion at three representative locations along the 6,000-foot pipelines alignment. In
combination with the pipe conditions discovered by the South Essex Sewerage District
' ("District") during the pipe section replacement at Station 6+00 back in March 2013, the
Condition Assessment in fact confirmed that severe deterioration of both the 20-inch and 24-inch
pipelines has occurred.
This conclusion is based on the Conditions Assessment work, which included direct underwater
observations of the pipelines, ultrasonic thickness tests, and soil corrosivity analysis. All of
these investigations show that the existing pipes are severely corroded and must be replaced.
' The public health and environmental consequences of another rupture could be substantial,
particularly if both pipelines rupture simultaneously. The discovery of deteriorated pipe at
representative locations of several thousand feet of subaqueous pipeline make planning and
execution of replacement difficult and expensive. Trenchless methods of replacement have been
evaluated and are not feasible or would require considerable time to implement. Because our
findings indicate that imminent failure will occur at any time, Parsons Brinckerhoff recommends
to the District that the pipelines be replaced using non-corroding high-density polyethylene
(HDPE) pipe, installed by direct burial (i.e. the same method used to construct the existing
' pipelines) in a new trench adjacent to the existing pipes.
RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
The recommended action plan is to replace both the 20-inch and 24-inch pipelines by installing
twin 24-inch High Density Polyethylene(HDPE) pressure mains across Salem Harbor, between
the existing Valve Structure A(Stramski's Park, Marblehead) and Valve Structure B (District
Wastewater Treatment Plant, Salem). These pipes would be installed in a parallel alignment
approximately 200-feet to the west of the existing pressure mains alignment.
' We strongly believe that based on the severely poor condition of the existing pipelines that the
issuance of any applicable emergency approvals and authorizations by federal and state
' jurisdictional agencies to replace these pipes is needed. Any delay in constructing the
replacement pipeline system increases the risk of experiencing another pipe rupture, with the
public health and environmental consequences of an uncontrolled discharge of untreated
' wastewater to the waters of Salem Harbor.
At present, the District's objective is to complete the design documents so that the project may
' be bid and awarded as soon as possible, wither construction duration of approximately 6 months.
CONSTRUCTION METHODS
' The proposed Marblehead Pipeline Replacement Project will replace the existing pipelines from
the existing Valve Structure A(Marblehead), across the Federal Navigation Channel in Salem
Harbor, to existing Valve Structure B, at District's Wastewater Treatment Plant in Salem.
' Draft preliminary plans (dated October 24, 2013), provided separately,show the proposed
Paye t PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
' Marblehead Pipeline Replacement Project
South Essex Sewerage District
October 23,2013
replacement pipelines alignment and various details.
In-Harbor Dredging/Trenching
The trench for the replacement pipelines in Salem Harbor will be excavated from a barge,
requiring excavation to depths of approximately 45 feet (below mean low water)in mid channel.
Excavation will be guided and verified using GPS technologyto stay within the proposed
alignment and depths. It is proposed to place the pipes in a trench that provides a 5-foot
minimum cover(10-foot in Federal Channel), comparable to the existing pipelines.
Excavated materials will be cast to the sides of the trench, and used to backfill the trench
following pipe installation. Sediment grain size and soil quality has been estimated based on
investigations performed under the Conditions Assessment work,and is available separately.
Excavated materials will be predominantly organic silts, silts and clays. Turbidity monitoring
will be performed during excavation and backfilling, and turbidity barriers will be used as
' required.
Backfilling of the trench is expected to produce some excess of material, equivalent to the
' volume of the two 24-inch diameter replacement pipelines and concrete collars that will be used
in the installation of the replacement pipelines. If all material is placed as backfill, a temporary
local increase of 2-feet in seabed elevation above the pipes will result in the areas outside of the
' Federal Navigation Channel. This mounding of backfill above the pipes will subside due to
settlement and tidal action, eventually blending into the surrounding bottom. The zone within the
Federal Navigational Channel shall be restored immediately to its pre-existing elevations
' following installation of the replacement pipelines.
Temporary Bypass
Near the shorelines,the replacement pipelines will be placed in the same trench as the existing
pipelines to avoid extensive rock excavation near the sensitive valve structures and operating
pipelines.
' Since wastewater flow must continue uninterrupted during construction, a short-term bypass will
be required. This will require the installation of a temporary bypass using one of the permanent
' pipelines that will be placed on the ground surface and hard-piped through the top of the existing
valve structures on each end. Temporary measures will be in place to restrain and protect the
temporary bypass pipeline during construction.
Pipeline Installation by the by the Float and Sink Method of Installation
The replacement pressure mains will be installed primarily using the"float and sink" method of
' construction. The replacement pressure mains shall be provided with 7 foot wide x 4 foot high x
1 foot thick precast concrete collars every 10 to 20 feet. Precise size and spacing of concrete
collars will be established during final design. The concrete collars are attached to the HDPE
pipe to counteract the effects of buoyancy.
1 The HDPE pipe will be joined by fusion welding methods, following procedures specified by the
pipe manufacturer, and will be tested before installation. HDPE pipe joined by these methods is
' widely used across the natural gas distribution industry as well as for water and wastewater
pipelines, and produces a completely uniform and monolithic pipe. The pipelines will be tested
in accordance with contract specifications before commissioning.
I ' Page 2 PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
III ,
Marblehead Pipeline Replacement Project
South Essex Sewerage District
October 23,2013
' Permanent Connection to Valve Structures
Once the temporary bypass pipe is connected into the valve structures, tested and placed in
service,the existing pipeline sections that cross the shoreline at the Marblehead and Salem ends
' will be excavated and removed. The shoreline crossings were installed in trenches cut into
bedrock(ledge), which were then backfilled and armored. To avoid the risk of encountering
rock in the shoreline areas the replacement pipes will be installed in the existing trenches, and
the backfill and rock armor will be reinstalled.
It will be necessary to place the fust pipe in service before the temporary bypass (second pipe)
can be disconnected,relocated into the trench, and reconnected. All connections will be tested
before the pipes are place in service.
III ' Environmental Mitigation
Environmental mitigations will be detailed in contract documents and shall be specific to the
areas in which they are to be applied. Following is a summary of the environmental mitigations. .
Off Shore/In Harbor. Turbidity booms, monitoring, silt curtains.
Shoreline Areas. Trench dewatering plan, erosion and sedimentation controls, turbidity booms,
monitoring and restoration. Existing rock armor will be removed as necessary to install the
replacement pipelines and reinstalled. Shoreline areas will be restored to pre-construction grades,
with sand and landscaping materials and rock armor replaced as required.
On Shore.; Erosion and sedimentation controls such as silt fence, geotextile fabric, hay bales,
straw wattle, anti-tracking pads. Onshore areas to be backfilled and restored to pre-construction
grades and conditions, with sand, grass and landscaping materials as required.
1 II
1
I
Page 3 PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
t
tATTACHMENT B
' USGS MAP
K
1
1
1
Attachment B
USGS Map
i
r' f
sch Sub ,
ort?? en
a era xatFtarr�i �` Knap
• ,..� atftide Rock
0 Sal m Ter gnat- c��y S O U
rt 3
y� 9ffilNtioll ?..�
eta• S
41 LtGNAA1=IJT
1 E CEMENT
OEUN 00,
y
4
1
ht 3 o yet
Point S A-E M '
5
1 �' •.
LOCUS MAP
0 400 600 1600
1
ill
' 1
1
1
1
1
Attachment C
' Sediment Grain Size and Chemical Analysis
1
' ENF Attachment C 1
Illllll� M M M illlll , M illi M illllll10 1111110 M M M M M M M
Ay�jSEW Marblehead Pressure Sewer Pipeline Alignment and Profile
~�.klulh Friel Gmerage Dishlcl
a
x
k
�i
is H..y
i
v`t
r �•v,
TRENCH PILE TRENCH PILE TRENCH
ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE
1+9
t _ i
ORGANICSILTSANDMUD t IFEDERAL I I , Rtt?'RAP
NA'VIGAT,ION'�'""1'�"`
1 CHANNEL t r
W
J % I GRAVELSEDDINW
m '
m - �-- r
� m
XQ
9EDROCK(DIORITE),-- �
TT
THRUST
i rvp
BLOCK
SIL AND CLAYS
i
1 1
{{ Soils Test Locations
X 1 I
0.00 2.00 4.W 6.00 a.W 10.1 12.00 11.00 16.00 18.00 20.06 22.00 L.00 N.W 10.W X.00 12.00 x.00 1.00 .b.W X.W 42.00 H.W 16.00 10.00 50.00 R.W N.00 56.00 58.00 60.00
o Soils Information taken at these locations PARSONS
APPROXIMATE LIMIT BETWEEN PILE ZONE AND TRENCH ZONE BROCKERMW
ENF Attachment C 2
Client: Parsons Brinckerhotf
' �� Project: SESD Soll Sampling
esting Location: SalemBoring ID: Cor sivity Sample Type: bag Tested By: cam
, MA Project NO: GT1< 300577
' E X P R E S S Sample 1D: Station 24+00 Test Date: 06/27/13 Checked By: 'dt
Depth : Test Id: 268251
Test Comment:
Sample Description: Moist,greenish gray organic clay
Sample Comment: ---
USCS Classification - ASTM D2487
tBoring ID Sample ID Depth Group Name Group Gravel,% Sand,% Fines,%
Symbol
Corroslvity Station 24+00 — organic clay OH 0.0 5.9 94.1
Remarks: Grain Size analysis performed by ASTM D 422 results enclosed I
Atterberg Limits performed by ASTM 4318,results enclosed
I
t
princes Ux+/owo na5or ria
3 �
' ENF Attachment C
e
Client: Parsons Brinckerhoff
c Project: SESD Soil Sampling
� • /y Location: Salem, MA Project No: GTX-300577
b®T -
{� esting Boring ID: Corroslvity Sample Type: bag Tested By: jbr '
E % PRESS Sample ID: Station 24+00 Test Date: 06/24/13 Checked By: jdt ,
Depth : --- Test Id: 268252
Test Comment:
Sample Description: Moist,greenish gray organic clay
Sample Comment: --
I Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422
0 0 $ s o
' 100 # # a # q
I
I ,
I I {
90
80 i I
I
70 ;
I
i
' 60
I 1
6°
F
40 i
, I
r I :
30 I I
r
1 f
I :
, I
101 I
° ' • 1 I 'I
1000 100 10 11 0.11 0.01 0.001
Grain Size(mm) '
I I
' °k Cobble %Gravel %Sand I %SiRBgaySiae
0.0 5.9 1 94.1
sieve Nome Siena Sire, percent pinar Spec-Parcept Compiles CoeHItjeDLg ,
RIM Das=0.0196 mm D30=0.0016 mm
' A4 4.75 100
060=0.0104 mm DIS=N/A
no 2.00 99
820 0.95 99 Dso=0.0064 mm D10=N/A j
s o 0.49 99 C =N/A =N/A +i
se° 0.25 97 1
' 1100 0.15 97 Classification 1
*no 0.005 94 ASTM organic clay(OH)
--- W wesm(mm) Pnmmflmr Sw.Perm., I Pllee
--
0.0244 93
' _ 0.0164 90 AASHTO Clayey Soils(A-7-6(41))
O.U100 Se
0.0028 u Sample/Test Description
--- 0.0056 47 Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : ---
0.°041 n
Sand/Gravel Hardness : ---
0.0.16 00
I
vr'1nceG 6/21/2011 a:041 s° !JI I
ENF Attachment C 4
_(� Client: Parsons 116nckerhoff
' ®®�g Locatioing n:
Salem,
aleCorroSoil SampProject le Type: bag Tested By:: �IGTX-300577
E X P 8 E S S Sample ID:Station 24+00 Test Date: 06/27/13 Checked By: jdt
' Depth : --- Test Id: 268250 }
Test Comment:
Sample Description: Moist, greenish gray organic clay
Sample Comment: ---
' Atterber Limits - ASTM D4318
' Plasticity Chart
80
50 ........:.................. ........;....... ...... .. .. .. .....
"Ln:fine
e
40 .................. ................ .... ..... ....
' .. GH or OH
30. ..... ..... ............. .... .... .... .. ..... ....
.... .... ..................
CL or OL
Ili , 10 ........ ................... ........:...............Mk or ... ........
' [ CL-ML: ML orOL
0
0 10 20 30 40 5o 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid Lind
I
a u
Boring De M Neturel LI le Pieetle PIonloty Liquielty Soil tlaeaairation '
Symbol Sample ID P 4
Y
Moisture rJma Lfmk Ilula>< Ineex
' content,%
_-_ 5 1 organic clay OH
Station 24+00 orrosivi 59 57 22 3 r9 y ( )
® i
Sample Prepared using the WET method
2%Retained on #40 Slave
Dry Strength: HIGH
' Dilatancy: SLOW
Toughness: LOW
' Due to a high organic content an Oven Dried Liquid Limit was peformed.
The Oven Dried Liquid Limit was I
I
1 princed s/:�/rou e:a�ar rul
' J
ENF Attachment C
Client: Parsons Brinckerhoff
Project: SESD Soil Sampling
the®Testing Boring ID: Core sivSample Type: bag Tested By: camm, MA Project No: TX-300577
ty
E I P 8 E S S Sample ID: Station 38+00 Test Date: 06/21/13 Checked By: idt
Depth : --- Test Id: 267753
Test Comment: --
Sample Description: Wet, olive gray clay with sand
Sample Comment:
USCS Classification - ASTM D2487
' Boring ID Sample ID Depth Group Name Group Gravel,% Sand, % Fines,%
Symbol
Corroslvity Station 38+00 -- fat clay with sand CH 2.0 13.1 84.9
' Remarks: Grain Size analysis performed by ASTM D 422 results enclosed
Atterberg Limits performed by ASTM 4318, results enclosed
1
printed sn,.i�o�.> 1144 21 CM ENF Attachment C
6
' Client: Parsons Brinckerhoff
Project: SESD Soil Sampling
GeoTestmg Boring ID: Corr sivty Sample Type: bag Tested By: jbrm, MA Project No: GTX-300577
E X P B E S S Sample ID: Station 38+00 Test Date: 06/14/13 Checked By: idt
Depth : --- Test Id: 267754
Test Comment: ---
Sample Description: Wet, olive gray clay with sand
Sample Comment:
i Particle Size Analysis - ASTM D422
C
o 0 0 W 0 0
100
90 I
1 1
1 1 1
i
BO I 1
r i
70
I
r 1
r i 1
60
5
d
60,
2
40 1 1
I I i
I r r r
1
I 1 1 1 1
30'
1 i
r
20 r I
1 1 I I
lor
I I
1 1
I I I I
r I I I I 1 1
I 1 1 I I r 1 1
O
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
Grain Size(mm)
%Cobble °/23ravel — °k3and- —'� %SiX3gaySize �
_
sieve Name sieve size,mm Percent Finer Spec.Percent complies Coefficients
De5=0.0777 mm D30=0.0038 mm
0.375 in 9.51 100 D6o=0.0246 mm Di5=N/A
#4 4.75 9B
A,o zoo 96 D50=0.0162 mm D10=N/A
Azo 0.85 94 C =.N A C, =N/A
' A40 0.42 92
#60 0.25 69 Classification
#110 0.55 e7 ASTM fat Clay WICK.Sand (CH)
#zoo 0.075 es
= P (rD34 (mm) vela7e Flna Sr..Ae¢en, clC..'11.-- AASHTO Clayey Soils (A-7-5 (104))
o.w49 76
0.0771 55
0.0,.30 46 Gamole/Test Description
' = 0.1197 az Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --
0.0065 39
1.1141 33 Sand/Gravel Hardness
-- 0.0033 28
.- 1.0015 24
p:i need 6/21/2013 1:45:06 PM 7
' ENF Attachment C
Client: Parsons Brinkerhoff
Project: SESD Soil Sampling
Ge®Testing Boring ID: Corr siv ty Sample Type: bag Tested By: cam
m, MA Project No: TX-300577
' E X P R E S S Sample ID: Station 38+00 Test Date: 06/18/13 Checked By: idt
Depth : --- Test Id: 267752
Test Comment: ---
Sample Description: Wet, olive gray clay with sand
Sample Comment:
' Atterberg Limits - ASTM D4318
Plasticity Chart
1001
90'1... .. .. .. .. .. ...
l
: .. .. .
Bob.....:...... ............. .... ..... .... ..... .;oty
;'tJne
70 J,.. .. .. - ... .. nje... ..
g60. .. ........ . ....}....y. ...r..... . ..._ V. .. .. ..
.`5Z.2 50 . . . . .. _ . . .. _ . . ..
40
CH or OH ..
30 . . _ .. .. .. .. ..
{
10I .. MH or OH
' 0 MLoi'OL
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Liquid Limit
1
1 Symbol Sample I0 "ring Depth Natuml ' LIgWd Plastic Plasticity Ligufdity Soil Qaceiflcatlon
moisture Dmit limit Indat Inde:
content'%
Q Station 38+00 orrosivit --- 185 140 49 91 1 fat clay with sand (CH)
Sample Prepared using the WET method
8% Retained on #40 Sieve
Dry Strength: MEDIUM
Dilatancy: SLOW
Toughness: LOW
pTIn CeL 6/2]/201] 1:45:26 FM s
ENF Attachment C
' Client: Parsons Brinckerhoff
Project: SESD Soil Sampling
Location: Salem,
Ge®Testing Boring ID: Corrosly ty Sample Type: bag Tested By: cam
A Project No: TX-300577
E X P R E S S Sample ID:Station 50+00 Test Date: 07/03/13 Checked By: mpd
' Depth : --- Test Id: 268551
Test Comment:
Sample Description: Moist,greenish gray sandy organic clay
Sample Comment: ----
USCS Classification - ASTM D2487
' Boring ID Sample ID' Depth: Group Name Group Gravel, % Sand, % Flnes,
� _ Symbol
Corroslvlty Station 50+00 --- Sandy organic clay OH 12.3 20,3 67.4
' Remarks: Grain Size analysis performed by ASTM D 422 results enclosed
Atterberg Limits performed by ASTM 4318, results enclosed
1
9
ENF Attachment C
' prinlsd713/20134:19:18 PM
Client: Parsons Br[rickerhoft
Project: SESD Sol[Sampling
Ge®Tes ung Borang ID: CorrLoction; Saleslvity Sample Type: bag T steel By: jbrA Project No: GTX-300577
E X P R E S S Sample ID:Station 50+00 Test Date: 07/03/13 Checked By: mpd
' Depth : --- Test Id: 268552
Test Comment:
Sample Description: Moist, greenish gray sandy organic clay
Sample Comment: ----
Particle Size Analysis ASTM D422
cm
I o oQ $
yy N R N
' 100 0 0 3k- 4k._--# 3i'kk �T. 7t
r 4 r
,
i t
i r 7 i i . ' i
80. . .. . ...... ... . )., ...... ...i.-.�. .�.. ..8.. ., . r,.. .I ..�. . ..�. ...._.
.. .. . 1111 . .... .. .
i r
70
. r.
y
ry fi0._.. . . 11,11-........ . .i . ., i.. .... . .. :.... 1111 .
LLL ;
_
c 50.
2 .. . 1111.. . .. ...... . ... 1 . . ' 1' 111'. ... .. ... �. . .
30. . ... 11. ..11 . .. .�..... . .. . ..i ..� .�. .-.:.i-. . ' . ..., 1111. ... . .. ..: ... ... 1111
., ... ,1111. ,1111 11,11 .. ,.-.. .-.. . t....-1111 ,
r �
10..... .... . 1111 . . . _ ..,n . .t .�1111 i , ... 11111.:.;. . �...i . .i.. .. 1. ....... .. 111:1..
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
' - Grein Size(mm)
%Cobble %Gravel %Sand %SIR&Clay Size
' 12.3 20.3 67.4
Sieve Name sieve Stmt Parma[Finer epee Percent Complies
Coefficients
mm - Des=0.8095 mm D
ao=0.0049 mm
' In 00
0.5 19. toe
os In 1280 es Dso=0.0384 mm Des=N/A
0.375 In 9.50 Be Dso=0.0219 mm D10=N/A
04 4.75 8a
010 2.00 07 C, =NJA - =NJA
a20 0185 es Classification
.40 0.42 82 ASTM Sandy organic clay (OH)
wso 0.25 n
0100 0.15 72
0200 0.075 6T AASH Clayey Solis(A-7-6 (21))
PONte iz4(mm) Perent finer 'spec Porten C4n1PIvs
-- 0.0306 59
0.0209 49 Sample/Test Desniptlpn
' = 0.0aw w
Sand/Gravel Particle Shape : --
0.0007 Bs Sand/Gravel Hardness ; ---
0.0062 33
--- 0.0044 29
SII , 0.0032 24
0.0010 IJ
printed 7/3I2013 4:18:09 PM ENF Attachment C 10
Client: Parsons Brinckerhoff
Project: SESD Solt Sampling
Location: Salem,
Ge®Testing Boring ID: Corr slvity Sample Type: bag Tested By: camMA Project No: p 300577
E X P R E S S Sample ID:Station 50+00 Test Date: 07/03/13 Checked By: mpd
' Depth : --- Test Id: 268550
Test Comment:
Sample Description: Moist, greenish gray sandy organic clay
Sample Comment: ----
Atterberg Limits - ASTM D4318
' - Plasticity Chart
60
50 .. ..:.. . .. :.... ....:...... ...:. . ... ........ ...Line
. .... . .
L
de
40 ...... ..:..... ...r.... .... :.. ... .. .. ... . ..... ..HorOH;.. . . . .... ....
' 30 . . ... . ........... .... .... ...... ..... . ..... . ... , ....
a
CL or OL
10. .. ... .. A ..... . .�.... .... :. � ... . .....
a'ML' MLor.OL
i
..--1------ -1--
' 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid Limit
Symbol Sample ID Boring Depth7NaturalFLIquid Plastic Plasticity Liquidity .Boll classlbcation
Limit IndexIndex
Station 50+00 orrosivit --- 21 30 1 Sandy organic clay(OH)
,- Sample Prepared using the WET method
' 18% Retained on 440 Sieve
Dry Strength: VERY HIGH
Dilatancy: SLOW
Toughness: LOW
Due to a high organic content an Oven Dried Liquid Limit was peformed.
The Oven Dried Liquid Limit was 35
t
11
' printed 702g134:17:3BPM ENF Attachment C
Chemical Analysis Results r
' Sediment Analvsis for Disposal Parameters
The purpose of these analyses is to assess sediment disposal alternatives in the event that sediment
removal were to be required to effect repairs to the existing pipelines. It is not anticipated that sediment
removal and disposal will be required for the installation of new pressure mains. Samples were collected
at the locations shown in Figure 1.
0L Sta. 38+06
TRSNCN %Le Mew" %LE 1N[NCN
ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE
sSta._24+00. �ta. 3,8+00� .. NNL.rE�wRyF _-1-�. .! _l,l l ORGANIC 9LT9ANDIAUO I � q:OERAt I ANw. r
—Q `.'t j,, { __� I ♦'
CANNEL NAHANNUM
B9 1R,
OOI�N0 4
'
`�
��-.ElINM $ILTSANOCLAYE�.
' Figure 1: Sediment Sampling Locations
In Massachusetts, upland disposal of dredged sediment is managed under solid-waste regulations and
' policies promulgated by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MassDEP).The
principal policies are:
- COMM-97-001 Reuse and Disposal of Contaminated Soil at Massachusetts Landfills; and
' - COMM-94-007, Interim Policy for Sampling, Analysis, Handling and Tracking Requirements for
Dredged Sediment Reused or Disposed at Massachusetts Permitted Landfills.
The contaminants analyzed for are summarized below:
' Parameter Units
Metals
o -Arsenic, Total (mg/kg)
o Barium, Total (mg/kg)
o Cadmium, Total (mg/kg)
o Chromium,Total (mg/kg)
' o Mercury, Total (mg/kg)
o Lead,Total (mg/kg)
o Silver, Total (mg/kg)
• Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons/extractable
petroleum hydrocarbons(VPH/EPH) . (mg/kg)
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (mg/kg)
12
' ENF Attachment C
• Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) (mg/kg)
• Chlorides (mg/kg)
1 Results
Analytical results for the sediment samples collected at Stations 24+00 and 38+00 are summarized in
Table 3, below, together with corresponding acceptance criteria from Policies COMM-94-007 and
COMM-97-001.
Table 3 Summa of Sediment Sam lis Results
t., ft ,�Mi 1
n1
Metals
Arsenic,total,mg/kg 7.19 11.5 40 40
' Barium,total,mg/kg 19.9 42.3 NA NA
Cadmium,total,mg/kg 0.731 1.83 80 30
Chromium,total,mg/kg 26.9 59.4 1,000 30
Lead,total,mglkg 5.83 11.4 2,000 1,000
Mercury,total,mg/kg ND ND 10 10
Silver,total,mg/kg 0.089 0.206 NA NA
TPH,mg/kg ND ND 5,000 2,500
' PCBs,mg/kg ND ND <2 <2
SVOCs,mg/kg ND ND 100 100
VOCs,mg/kg ND ND 10 4
TPH values obtained from EPH data by summing the three EPHfractions and target PAH
analytes, consistent with guidance in MassDEP Policy WSC-02-411.
CONCLUSIONS
Disposal Parameters
Based on the sampling performed in this investigation, sediment characteristics would allow for in-state
disposal in the event that excavation for pipeline repair or replacement were to generate excess sediment
' volumes. It should be noted that the sampling performed was limited as to locations, and may not be
representative of sediments everywhere else along the alignment.
Landfills will require sampling and analysis at a frequency higher than that afforded by the testing
conducted to date, and it is possible that this testing could yield different results. If it should be
determined that the selected approach to pipeline repair or replacement will generate sediments that
would require upland disposal, a further round of sampling is recommended.
The data from the sampling performed to date do not suggest that reuse of sediment as backfill or cover
over a pipe trench would present an environmental hazard. Contaminant levels detected in both samples
' are low, and in the case of Arsenic and Barium are consistent with naturally occurring levels in marine
clays in the Boston-North Shore area. Indeed,the sample results are broadly similar, and at the present
time there is no reason to assume that they are not representative of the alignment of the existing pipeline
j ' or a reasonably contiguous alternative alignment.
13
' ENF Attachment C
ATTACHMENT D
CZM CONSISTENCY REVIEW
it
i , 1
CZM Proeram Policies
' The CZM Program policies are divided into the following 9 categories:
• Coastal Hazards,
Energy,
• Growth Management,
' . Habitat,
• Ocean Resources,
• Ports and Harbors,
' • Protected Areas,
• Public Access, and
• Water Quality.
' This following sections list each policy and management principle as contained in the regulations at 301
CMR 21.00 and demonstrates that the project can be designed and constructed consistent with them.
COASTAL HAZARDS
-COASTAL HAZARD POLICY#I -Preserve protect restore and enhance the beneficial functions of
storm damage andflood control provided by natural coastal land orms such as dunes, beaches
t barrier beaches coastal banks, land subject to coastal storm flohgge, salt marshes, and land under the
ocean.
u
' All coastal landforms within the project area will be restored to their current configuration and topography
to ensure no change to any functions of storm damage prevention and flood control that may be provided.
'
-COASTAL HAZARD POLICY#2-Ensure that construction in water bodies and contiYUOUS land areas
will minimize interference with water circulation and sediment transport. Flood or erosion control Proiects
must demonstrate no sign scant adverse effects on the project site or adjacent or downcoast ureas..
' All construction in water bodies and contiguous land areas will be limited in duration. All coastal landforms
and underwater areas within the project area will be restored to their current configuration and topography
to ensure no change to water circulation and sediment transport.
-COASTAL HAZARD POLICY#3-Ensure[hat state andfederally funded public works proiects proposed
for location within the coastal zone will: .
•not exacerbate exisiine hazards or damage natural bufl"ers or other natural resources.
• be reasonably safe from flood and erosion related damage.
•not promoteVrawth and development in hazard prone or buffer areas especially in velocity zones
and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern.
•not be used an Coastal Barrier Resource Units for new or substantial reconstruction of structures
in a manner inconsistent with the Coastal Barrier Resourca/Irnprovement Acts.
' The new pipelines will be below grade both in the harbor and the upland shore areas. Therefore
there will be no changes that will exacerbate existing hazards or damage natural buffers or other
' natural resources.
' 2
1
1
• The new pipelines will be below grade both in the harbor and the upland shore areas. Therefore, it
' is protected from flood and erosion-related damage.
• There are no Velocity zones and ACECs within the project areas,so these aspects are not
applicable.
' • There are neither Coastal Barrier Resource Units nor new coastal structures involved, so these
aspects are not applicable.
'
*COASTAL HAZARD POLICY#4-Prioritize acquisition of hazardous coastal areas that have high
conservation and/or recreation values and relocation ofstructures out ofcoastal high-hazard areas.giving
due consideration to the effects ofcoastal hazards at the location to the use and manageability of the area.
This policy is not applicable to the project.
ENERGY
' •ENERGYPOLICY#I -For coastally dependent energy facilities assess siting in ahernative coastal
locations For non-coastally dependent energy facilities assess siting in areas outside of the coastal zone.
Weigh the environmental and safety impacts o locating proposed energy facilities at alternalive sites
' This policy is not applicable to this project.
' •ENERGYPOLICY#2-Encourage energy conservation and the use ofrenewable sources such as solar
and wind ewer in order to assist in meeting the energy needs of the Commonwealth-
This policy is not applicable to this project.
w
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
•GROWTHMANAGEMENT POLICY#1-Encow•age sustainable development that is consisteni with
' state regional and local plans and supports the quality and character of the community.
This policy in not applicable to this project.
' -GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY#2- Ensure that state and ederally funded infrastructure proiecGr
in the coastal zone primarily serve existing developed areas assigning highest priority to Projects that meet
the needs of urban and community development centers. .
' This policy in not applicable to this project.
'
-GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY#3- Encourage the revitalization and enhancement of existing
development centers in the coastal zone through technical assistance and financial support for residential
commercial and industrial development..
' This policy in not applicable to this project.
' 3
1
1
HABITAT
' HABITAT POLICY#1 -Protect coastal estuarine and marine habitats—including salt marshes. shellfish
beds submerged aquatic vegetation dunes,..beaches barrier beaches banks salt ponds eelgrass beds tidal
flats, rocky shores bays sowzds and other ocean habitats—and coastal freshwater streams ponds and
wetlands to preserve critical wildlife habitat and other important functions and services including nutrient
and sediment attenuation, wave and sta m damage protection and landform movement and processes.
' The coastal resource areas of relevance to this project include the beach area at the Marblehead end of the
pipeline and some nearby eelgrass beds, which are adjacent to, but not within,the project area.
' The District will provide the results of an eelgrass survey, to be performed by a qualified marine biologist to
verify the current locations of eelgrass in the areas immediately adjacent to the project.
' Beach in Project Area:
The applicable habitats for this project are limited to a small area of beach on the Marblehead side adjacent
' to the existing pipelines. Project construction will temporarily impact a portion of this beach, but it will be
restored after construction is completed. The disturbance is estimated to be for less than 6 months.
' Nearby Eelgrass Beds:
Eelgrass beds have been mapped by the Department of Environmental Protection(DEP), with the most
recent mapping in 2012. The succession of the mapping indicates a recession of the extent of the eelgrass
' beds, with the 2012 map(see Figure I below) indicating that the current eelgrass beds stop just north of the
project area.
' There is also a small area of eelgrass mapped near the Salem shoreline, as indicated in Figure 1 below.
However,the existing and proposed pipelines do not impact this resource area.
Therefore there will be no disturbance to the existing eelgrass beds.
The District will provide the results of an eelgrass survey,to be performed by a qualified marine biologist to
verify the current locations of eelgrass in the areas immediately adjacent to the project.
' 4
eel grass area
A `
w
EXISTING
PIPELINES
f eel grass area
' eel
' ;grass
'a e s
REPLACEMENT eel grass area
' PIPELINES
ALIGNMENT
•
' Figure 1—Eelgrass in Project Area,2012 (MassDEP Eelgrass Mapping Project)
Mitigation
' SESD will implement mitigation including:
Environmental mitigations will be detailed in contract documents and shall be specific to the areas in which
' they are to be applied. Following is a summary of the environmental mitigations.
Off Shore/In Harbor.Turbidity booms, monitoring,silt curtains.
' Shoreline Areas. Trench dewatering plan,erosion and sedimentation controls,turbidity booms,monitoring
and restoration. Existing rock armor will be removed as necessary to install the replacement pipelines and
reinstalled. Shoreline areas will be restored to pre-construction grades, with sand and landscaping materials
and rock armor replaced as required.
5
1
On Shore. Erosion and sedimentation controls such as silt fence, geotextile fabric, hay bales, straw wattle,
' anti-tracking pads. Onshore areas to be backfilled and restored to pre-construction grades and conditions,
with sand, grass and landscaping materials as required.
-HABITAT POLICY#2-Advance the restoration ofdegr aded or ormer habitats in coastal and marine
areas.
' There are no degraded or former habitats in the project area and therefore no wetland restoration is proposed
as part of the project.
' OCEAN RESOURCES
OCEANRESOURCESPOLICY#I-Support the development ofsustainable auuaculture both for
commercial and enhancement(public sheUrsh stocking) purposes Ensure that the review process
regulating aquaculture Awility sites (and access routes to those areas)protects signiftcant ecological
' resources (salt marshes dunes beaches barrier beaches and sallponds) and minimizes adverse effects on
the coastal and marine environment and other water-dependent axes.
tThis policy in not applicable to this project.
OCEAN RESOURCES POLICY#2-Except where such activity is prohibited by the Ocean Sanctuaries
' Act or other applicable rovision of law, the extraction ofoil natural gas or marine minerals (other than
sand and gravel) in or affecting the coastal zone must protect marine resources marine water quality,
fisheries and navigational recreational and other uses.
' This policy in not applicable to this project.
-OCEAN RESOURCES POLICY#3-Accommodate offshore sand and gravel mining needs in areas and
' in ways Thal will not adversely a ect marine resources, navigation or shoreline areas due to alteration of
wave direction and dynamics Mining ofsand and gravel when and where permitted will be primarily for
the purpose of beach nourishment or shoreline stabilization.
' This policy in not applicable to this project.
PORTS AND HARBORS
' -PORTSAND HARBORS POLICY#1- Ensure that dredging and disposal ofdredeed material minimize
adverse effects on water quality, physical processes marine productivity and public health and take full
advantage ofop 2ortunities for beneficial re-use
' • All dredging will be enclosed by silt curtain to contain turbidity so as to minimize adverse effects on
water quality and aquatic resources. The material will be initially sidecast on either side of the dredged
' trench for the pipeline for subsequent reuse as backfill material.
• Once the pipeline is placed and surveyed, the trench will be backfilled with the sidecast material. There
will be some excess material, which is equal to the volume of the new pipelines and the concrete collars
' required to counter the effects of pipeline buoyancy. This excess material will be gently mounded over
6
1
the width of the trench, resulting in a mound in the order of 6 to 10 inches in height above existing
' bottom elevations, over an approximate 24-foot width. This backfill operation will be enclosed by silt
curtain so as to minimize adverse effects on water quality and aquatic resources.
• The areas where sidecast material is placed will be returned to the pre-construction contours. To assure
' this, a pre-construction bathymetric survey performed in June 2013 will serve as the pre-construction
bottom contours. A post-construction bathymetric survey will be performed after completion of the
trench backfilling operations. The pre- and post-construction surveys will be compared to determine if
all the sidecast areas have been returned to the pre-construction contours. If not, the contractor will be
' required to regrade the areas and re-survey them to demonstrate compliance with this requirement.
• Dredged material will be reused for bedding and backfill of pipelines in lieu of using imported bedding
and fill.
' PORTSAND HARBORS POLICY#2-Obtain the widest possible Public benefit from channel dre(Ig%nY
' and ensure that Desienated Port Areas and developed harbors are given highest priority in the allocation of
resources. .
' This policy is not applicable to this project.
PORTS AND HARBORS POLICY#3-Preserve and enhance the capacity of Designated Port Areas to
' accommodate water-dependent industrial uses and prevent the exclusion of such uses from tidelands and
any other DPA lands over which an GFA ag_encv exerts control by virtue ofownership or other legal
authority.
' This project is within the Salem DPA—see Figure 2 below.
Where the new pipelines cross the DPA, it is the navigation channel. While construction over the pipelines
would be precluded, their crossing of the DPA in mid-channel would have no impact that might preclude
any development of water-dependent industrial uses. Within the Federal Channel, the pipeline will be
buried with at least 10 feet of cover in accordance with US Army Corps policy, to protect it during any
' future dredging of the channel.
t
7
t
1
1
® ^°-' —""�-• 8atem Harbor ....1
..........
v an9V WI PMMY IePAI
N a
4 P 5If{
r F.
ik x 1d
5 a qY
' • wr,laa.o..�c clwel a�.w•eF.u. �AORnr.VWl \ o ••';� s a
No.e+.aMAm wve.r rwiwev.ia.ry a �e••
Figure 2: Salem Designated Port Area Source:Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management.
1
-POR TS AND HARBORS POLICY#4-For development on tidelands and other coastal waterways,
preserve and enhance the immediate waterfran!for vessel-mlafed activities that require sufcieni space and
suitable facilities along the Hrater's edge for operational purposes.
' This policy is not applicable to this project.
'
-PORTS AND HARBORS POLICY#4-Encourage through technical and financial assistance, expansion
of water-dependent uses in Designated Port Areas and developed harbors re-development of urban
waterfronts and ex anion of phvsical and visual access..
' This policy is not applicable to this project.
PROTECTED AREAS
' -PROTECTED AREAS POLICY#1-Preserve restore, and enhance coastal Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern which are complexes ofnatural and cultural resources ofregional or statewide
significance..
' This policy is not applicable to this project.
' -PROTECTED AREAS POI ICY#2-Protect state desienated scenic rivers in the coastal zone..
B
This policy is not applicable to this project.
' -PROTECTED AREAS POLICY#3-Ensure that proposed developments in or near designated or
rMgistered historic places respect the preservation intent of the designation and that potential adverse
' effects are minimized..
This policy is not applicable to this project.
PUBLIC ACCESS
•PUBLICACCESS POLICY#1-Ensure that development(both water-dependent or nonwater-dependent)
ofcoastal sites subject to state walerwa+mss regulation will promote general public use and enjoyment of the
' water's edge to an extent commensurate with the Commonwealth's interests in Rowed and filled tidelands
under the Public Trust Doctrine. .
' This policy is not applicable to this project.
•PUBLICACCESS POLICY#2-Improve public access to existing coastal recreation facilities and
' alleviale auto traffic cmd parking problems through improvements in public transportation and trail[inks
(land-or water-based) to other nearby facilities. Increase capacityofexisting recreation areas by
facilitating multiple use and by improving management maintenance, and public support facilities.Ensure
that the adverse impacts ofdevelopmeng proposed near exisitngpublic access and recreation sites are
' minimized..
This policy is not applicable to this project.
•PUBLICACCESS POLICY#3-Expand existing recreation facilities and acquire and develop newpublic
areas for coastal recreational activities giving highest priority to regions of high need or limited site
' availability. Provide technical assistance to developers of both public and private recreation facililies and
sites that increase public access to the shoreline to ensure that both transportation access and the
recreation facilities are compatible with social and environmental characteristics ofsurrounding
' communities. .
This policy is not applicable to this project.
WATER QUALITY
' -WATER OUALITYPOLICY#1 - Ensure that point-source discharges and withdrawals in or affecting the
coastal zone do not compromise water quality standards and protect designated uses and other inlerests.
' Existing Point Discharees
' There are no existing point discharges associated with the Marblehead pressure mains.
WA TER QUALITY POLICY#2-Ensure the implementation ofnonpoint source pollulion controls to
' promote the attainment of water quality standards and protect designated uses and other interests.
' 9
Construction Impacts
' Work within the Coastal Zone will be designed and constructed to comply with federal and state effluent
limitations including point source discharges. Non-point pollution controls will promote the attainment of
' state surface water quality standards. The replacement pipes will be installed parallel to the existing active
sewers, with enough separation so that construction can be performed without damaging these pipes.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)will have the opportunity to review and comment on the
' project during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (COE) Section 404 permit process. The permit
application to the US Army Corps of Engineers was filed on September 16, 2013.
' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MADEP)will have the opportunity to review
project activities as part of the application for Water Quality Certification.
' Furthermore, SESD will hire an on-site, independent environmental inspector during the construction phase,
among other duties the inspector will keep logs that note the turbidity conditions, note any sediment plumes
and corrective actions,and list the various measures employed to reduce turbidity and their effectiveness.
' -WA TER OUALITY POLICY#3-Ensure that subsurface waste discharges conform to applicable.
standards including the siting construction, and maintenance requirements for on-site wastewater disposal
wstems water quality standards established Total Maximum Daily Load limits, and prohibitions on
' facilities in high-hazard areas.
This policy is not applicable to this project.
t
' Summary
The proposed project will greatly enhance and protect the coastal environment by providing new pipes to
replace the severely corroded raw wastewater conveyance pipelines, one of which has already ruptured and
' discharged raw sewage into Salem Harbor,and replacing them with corrosion-resistant pipes. The entire
pipeline will be buried and will not have any permanent visual,environmental,or development impacts to
the coastal zone within Salem Harbor.
1
10
tATTACHMENT E
PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS
(13 plan sheets, following this page)
I
1
1
7 10
2
1 CONTRACT No. 13-1
A
A MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
_ SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT
50 FORT AVENUE
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS p
' B
0 0 / f
' •• rn r-;
c •`i
• r
��•���; �01�- M ' y d l //I DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS
INDEX OF duv4Ncs end ••
Sch J '• • '✓ •• 1 f // WALTER A. DEFILIPPI, P.E., CHAIRMAN
DENEML
Cr, COVER SHEET 'y • /� Sub
t r O p PI 6f / MICHAEL P. COLLINS, P.E., MEMBER, BEVERLY
RICHARD P. RODGERS, P.E. MEMBER, DANVERS
DNA
p_1 OVERNEWPLAN •• �. e.r 1a�)- at am // Knapfq,y ROBERT J. LANGLEY, P.E., MEMBER, PEABODY D
C-3 PLAN AND PROnLE SHEET 1 OF P • •• .. ��- '� a d9- / / Rock
D C-4 PLAN AND PAT SE SHEET z OF z DAVID H. KNOWLTON, P.E., MEMBER, SALEM
C-5 AREA PLAN AT AR EHEA STRUCTUREI-W
C-e "REV PLAN TR "T°ES EXISTING°"L�51R1C1'"E • D �.. AMY MCHUGH, MEMBER, MARBLEHEAD
C-7 VALVE STRUCTURES TEMPORARY
C[MDITIOHS
C-] VALVE STRUCTURES PERMANENT CONDITIONS
FB VALVE NAND SEDT PERMANENT CONDITIONS p 1
' C-9 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1 OF I / •1 �. Sal Ter
fr10 ERMCN AND SI OF 2i CONTROL'1 OF 2
C-11 oETA65 SHEET 1 of z • /�) • rf sou ,
C-13 DEMOS SHEET 3 OF 3
• /,, y 3
E1,
•Y 9 =/ TIN --------Z—
✓ IgELIJES E
� �- IVDISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
ALAN F.TAUBERT, JR., P.E., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
U LIGNO NT6 DAVID MICHELSEN, DISTRICT ENGINEER
' E CENT
PPE r
4
r O
ht 3 / oWer
1 T'OtR� 5 '
IS
G
:_•
' LOCUS MAP
1_NNz NR�zaxTu ,
1
H
1 H
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT out.; Sccle: Drawing Title: Drawing No.
CONTRACT No.13-1 50 FORT AVENUE &mocil=Wor -- 10/24/13 AS N07ED COVER SHEET G—I
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
i 2 3 4 5 6 I 7 8 9 10
s e 10
2 3
4.. r"tF
«'i
IkY
ow
M •Ari
s
4
3
c
° i .!� . ' �� .� � ^ a �,.r- fwd � � ` � ���, ) �•a'�,. �� A.= r 4rt3x` k•'r71".,� Sc� � "9��'�f. ll[ � f'f� �' I
ksr
}
U
.M "m
.� �a '+4� 1. Oi,Q �j 1 .F k.; d s ' ' �1 ,�s- F:.. v5 t$
� �
y \ cif
E
E
G
F y
F
r�
I�
C
G
� Zoo�0 400 DRAFT
' y SCALE IN FEET 1
i
Drawing No.
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT Dale: Scale: Drowmg 1111e:
CONTRACT No.13-1 50 FORT AVENUE Cp ®- 10/24/13 AS I`OIFD OVERwLw C—�
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS — —`
z I 3 I 4 s s I R ( 9 I °
2 3
_ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i
i
wt
(jiv4 -
�...n, .5+ y (�- x " 1 Y.< ...i !
—A
FIN,�'O .. 4� L 1 w� ` Z(y+4 „r1 .% f f �I , 2 I A
A {,. A ' *. `^• •. k';=' }/ : / , e tfI51d10 ME TO xfu.Mx w oUDE L lz
v"'. f i'
y
;. ~< f✓.:.r- '4, � � .,..,,, - !r Jx, t 4 f ,1�:,a t � "1;. t e I f''' y� �+ r;'c.—".- ;� ,,, .."t `y 'x � 1 ��S
r �
t'"✓"t � x`. _x- t"`. '` v-x ", f � f#.-�'='�.�s+n,� � y �Nt ,;•^ _-s,]\ "A".1;�' f �§'ry., r. � � r I•�4 q J � 'L'
:
" x an Y r a..Tt r7. J k4
e'SFY �
, Ajlr
�
'.��rr'
:Y - .1, x., .✓r�'t-,a;f �'A" _..,,,», .✓.k'''tk� -'" t* 7:. �."i i 9E-E ps'Ifgtt - �- �n�r,a ".,,
_ ,. - t� _�✓�.1'.r{xt+ 1 � ,�%`L, b ��_ 5rr,�Y,t x.. 'x'�.`�, -cc�r r.a
•� f7f
x
R ' ,.� T".f„9 a/i' •9y;' e. :Cy.. '^ Q �j��T '.4iz„w- _,a.,..... <,
e J
Y1roC:9Esro
,7 °: i e k � r� ��.,,t, � u1r�. ;t5:r 1 ,. .. - II: t``_.' �.:_ -..:."-4, ,, i ” <• r t ,^.-:. tit 1/j�12F"" xo
iti�Dtwrr , L '"ro 5. y '�._� '� � ..._..1 •� `• `;�L{ t / v^c35 '.'�i , t, L 3 -''.1-
3J ♦ y
;,'=-
i`.
a ti..'
�
Mew
. w sai.nc .m'
V&WSTROCIU -: aw.. sa,w� 4 3cw r y t
fI # \ rq...; f-' ' 2.. •._.�"v ' cif-1!'lli�' i
e wrM� �`;..-_ f s ( tE wTL1DEWIN ✓' '�. � � 1 i1L'('
ll .� yy�.
LAMMS
cmc€ �N 1 .V
�t
or� ��, =Y�<^'1 r.ti� i`. •�l 14i���}1����i.�l�•� � "\�I n9�1� _. .. �a.
im
0 ExsnRo Minx¢. - B.D
Q t
MI!/EL -010
E%ISDNO SEABED
_
?1e.,
x
`
3 � A
g P HOPE
5
1101) 10.
qq
1 �
M 1�
`
NOTES I4. r
1 1. .TNS U VAT10NS DEPICTED HER ON PRE&SED UPON MGN LOWER LOW WATER. � D 'S 5 !O 1 E R
'11 N EPCCN IM-3001, WED UPON TIM BENCNMARN STAMPING 2613 C T
t }1993 ELEVATION li RD1 PL
T6.92'.
2 THE ROMK NTPJL HORCDNEST TB UPON NOEWCAN MLUM
of
m_ , 19eD,.{wmB).MAsvcxusmG srAn[PUNS c6DRmxarmm._.
\WMh b
}
$, t
5 t
3 l
j]
z A
610 h sv n r6 J^ E
fr110 h39] i JO J 55fnOp 5 5•DJ S.r 90 J.l C e M SJ-0. ii0 OC Y-OL S , ♦ v.r.] 5 ,�C rYCL a rA SCD ✓9•]0 .J9 CA ].. .] E SJL.f9 JvrOi rpC ..]5.00 v n t] SJ-rfC ..D.,O R, .0
I
.E 1. vE S. ..h^ l:. b .� (5 0 •�. .. ' - •A .2.0, , r:C
H
PROFILE
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT Rate cDle Drawing Tltle: Drawing No.
CONTRACT No:,13-1 50 FORT AVENUE }' „ '}p/24/13 AS'.NOTEO PLAN AND PROFILE C—Z
10
-
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
1
2 3 4 5 6 _,. 7 8 9
1 2. ,}.. 4 5 I 6 7 8
a 10
Y
\+ l _� ,r) I r5. \ T 1 ��i y\ .`st ` SfRIICNRE M MM6lFHEID - A
• EXISTING PIPE TO REMAIN IN PLACE
4M
f �'» —! *.' r *2 ', ..7
3�1 • i y 2 .9,..
B : y?, ." 1 / , ,;, S"- -.��„"`.✓ --:'' 14' 4 - 'l7 s��,. ,^- *. -' ray '\' `� 1 `-'• ',' �' f rns E
4.
d i.
SEEE ma cmlENr
- .4 S ».-'-'...- ^"` —_r,�—�"+,1-a.jf\�• / ra.,'^r ,-"' ..ix-+- ^.`".`- i'1 `'i ^'yW �5{
.. r} 5;II C�'�^/1 y. Sl 4E'".�1 �^y,t*- 41`5 it Ni��f� C y✓ �Y %4 tT r •we y-, 'Y�:, .w:.' SRQO i� ` 5 �` j {e
Ilk
.ws%G'"7^ \ 1 .• f �.d\) ` S t+ ~ v `�aC� t�``s ` „" \ '
1 4•G;�iY�l � 1 1rtu€> ''"'fs 11",, i. � '. -. }V,`~�
srm sca -:Go aD53rs;•.oa xa.vtt, `nz. v9. L2,. a '-.s m ��� rr1 .' �: `-' '-7 �,^*,. ,MAPWOM.
21
C .__ ...., ,c'" FRasMNFi "TI l M sp,t I i t.rX C „'w'.ti+�.... a \�
:
FIRU _w�. ,w .t _
�+�/ ) r`14`,c ,� 2 � =-t�'..t ~ � �l � .. �M`W i
~ f PLANMAR L
BEH...
EAD
t
' TSN EMSDND
D
39
-mom
a ,
• e d
a e 3 R e I faEsmlaJ ) tl `.
p scan
j( IFIOE-
t
i ! Pia W IS E r. r $ r
x7 mPE
t E
5 3 i. THE ELNAMRS DEPICTED HEREON ME OWED UPON MEN!LONER LOW WATER,,
D 'GD AID ''AID i ! � VO&EPoCH 1903-3001.NMM UPON!PM EENCb4AN STAMPING 264'C 1
.. • - £ F"9iCf � ' 1992 MDiAlDH. 16921
' :thTCu'rIK 14.,IN:Le` I 2. 11L HORQONIIL CONINOL NEMOW IS BASED.UPON NORM AMERICAN MMM
983(Wo),HAESALYIUSIMS.VAX PVNE COORDINATE SS1EN. t
r y e t � e.„ v ML%ETfJ.'SS3A5 fSYi Y . . 6 � 1
HAW.
i
WE
IL
s
`39.GG 3xnnC 5>]r � rl. R) >'i5 "1 f(enC', >35 C] -[t r0] ill .... .(0'1:. J G.r 5h v} > x i. Cu 5J l> n_V� 5:1..4 i,ruo .....9 L. F..V9 5(n..} yy.r{p W,lv W�•O[ A<•o0 ,LS vY A>Sl] x r .w .. 1Y9:U1
' H PROFILE H
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT Cote Scale Growing Title: Drawing No. t
CONTRACT ND.13-1 50 FORT AVENUEsY! Oq �y' 10/24/13' ASNOTED: PLMI AND PROFILE - C-.3
' MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS _
... 10..... 1
3 4 5 T6 7 8 9
i
2
!` 2 -VIS11149 PRPSSUtj fu�R1N8
�9�Q+
ll
R �
REPLACEMENT
f Y ° �fi PRESSURE MAIM i
Dilit
` D
' ql0` , A / ` 9 'TRENCH CK a a
-
PIPE 2
TEMPORARIiA
BYPASSP
D
D ° F ¢i
4 VALVE '� r'q ,�, '^u n .i:1 y,�!
STRUCTUR PIPS t.
s 7
F "Afi ' 1 ♦ ♦ F y - t
� 1 _
F
MLW-
iL
1- THE ELEVATIONS OEPICiED HEREON ME BASED UPON MLOWER LOW WATER.
' —
TL EPOCH 1903-2001,a,sm UPON PDPL 6EHLHMN X STMPRO 2645 C
1992 ELEVAMN = I592'.
2. THE HORoONT.LL COUNCIL NETWORK IS MED UPON NORTH AMEWCW DMUM 'DRAFT
OF 190.1(NMBI).NASSXRUSEIS RARE PWIE COORDINATE MTEM.
a 20 40 sD
CONTRACT No.13-1 SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT
Dose: SCele: Drawing TAle: Drcwing N- 1
:MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT 50 FORT AVENUE �;:,.— 10/24/13 AS NOTED AflEA FLAN nr SEso vAEve slRucruRE C-4
SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS — --- — 1
2 ' 3 4 5 7 I S g .0
_ I 2 3 4 s 6 7 a 9 c
A ..
A
�e�y
yM
:iJx 6 T 4 tVi (>•' �j 'H,!f� 1` " fir: .I!" E
r1.t�,'x�'� 2'� a. . �kC@���}� .z °�.' "� It I 4 �� �i>•a*�,y $> . � � �Y�T.� '6 '° .ME"' ? ., '�
s+ �% u 490't INSTALL v
... F '3
" y { %NT,0 PES IN 7 A , tS :. H
i
N '1'RENG�F;I
74
u ytT ti 8 _.. 3h± _ ,Y. -� y „f VALVE,. ,y» „ •bE :
a a, t�* r (P , STRUCTURE A _
.a
is § tc TEM ORARY `-, i tr -- _— .r �RgLEHEAD"L
as,F # BYPASB s �--- .j
I
Y�.,,y, .r 1 f f
' �r T(4�AIIYJ 7 ' r A'TD. .} • 4 . 1
—711=1I`ljU
T�fR�S ,QLOCK ;r "'` r -��
„ r ..� rL p y�
"tp..E't` rt .s s y . SMA to
S}'ART ROCK30tia04
'EASEMEN7
a � REPLAQEuik1lT
TRENCH "
'�{
:Y "D s +�-i." /`` ?i
D .f L tF M # w s E T5 , IF� +t� a .�`.q R ... `5� � r ,37f=t: n� � � �?�,^s�Yyr[Y" r �, 1 R '''� • r R ,
y ( f j�
�#� t t r x,. � �w` ski �� �#:'� S�` �
xR# s "s-..pr 6 >� '�"';x t 4 T il4 " rSiV V rtr �(. .• " � lr,
n `✓ ,�` w .� �s wee/ ,r 4`
BCf
;.: 3 .x. t w @* j 4 i ,(,[(�,� i x 2 Ate. 4q .t• �,,. h "t. a w ° 14:
x '
rw. a x lw w
W, c .� h ' � >s .+ -- &yd � 9�,6<+�t• ,, MLWyz r i '. r , G.r -t-�. C7 j,�,r'� � . `
,,.,a^� r f`�¢a*• m i 4 2 '� � t` � � 4'T c tQ�*' Y`�r t A t <p r `"i wZy vt. � �.^ '.'� M " +'Y
a r i
•.�+ e�'S1R° x i�,�* ^�5'r df�t `fix ' I a v � �"{? } yy �'" ,",;�«#x�T x .,e.Awy A tr ♦ �: f f s y.rP"-i�.
�` �r ��L � t � TT33 I 1 ^.�� }P 8� f4 � e'1' +� T`"�1[��•.J � /. �.,�,. w' yd l
e
OF
6,+ * r"i 'x*. ` M >y ^/1+ '}+'Y+ .�. r4M1 ✓ `°' ..• w°'a�+ '� '"" JR ' =q YxF �i
x
b t i
re. I
/S�
.- r ��£s r a >. >i i 2` T. 'J£7q,Yn�`:xL•. .iYt ,,, -5-' ,- G
t NOIYCTHE EUYATONS DEP10, KEREON MSE BASE UPo MEAN LN LMV wMIR 1
OW EPOCH 19& 20UI.R D uitlN iUN&lILXMMiN si.WRNc 26u c
+q .ni;zy y„ { ^.yyd p• 1994 ELLVATON 15.9Y.
2. ME HM120MN COMROL NETWORK 6 9,,EA UPo NWH MESION MI,W
r r Y+ {r 'tf 9r'%. ✓ - 'T
of �9an(xMma1, MAssAcxusErrs sTnTE PLWk coDMruTE smEM.
ta�' `x+�'
e 20 {C 6D DRAFT
= zD'
Tf2ACT N13-1 SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT
CON
Dale: [Ac
ale' D,c,,oq Title: Drawing No.
50 FORT AVENUE �5.t.�, v—�.. 10/24/13 S NOTED AREA PLAN AT SCSD VALVE STRUCTURE C-5
MAR6LEHEAD PIPELINE REPLo.ACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
6 7 d 9 7G
2 _ 3 __... 4 5. 6 9
A
r
pp
3
.
i
,C V,VP,.1q
f
1'P - f
suel,gN LAIL.JJ'' � n i :q � 2D' c wre 1
s } t ro
0 P E
REMOVED
SECTION
VALVE STRUCTURE B (SALEM) SECTION — VALVE STRUCTURE A (MARBLEHEAD)
sv_e a/a'= l.•-o° sca.E s;e• = r.-e^
D C_ te'ElOW YEfCN _ O !
21'FlMME
a4 D Np3 1 ^^Y! %ib CORCEN`F—Z
INLREtSEii(ryP) ..— ..
F .
IF
` C
E TEE will, z4 0suPsru[a trrexD fUNOww.>IxDI ss PIPE ax^ ^ ti
\f
4 giyE VOLI S / 320- 4 CA VALff
x a
I
_ t
20 lEE M H RI r2-���T _41 0110
(. �
4{ �t PRfS+LPE CaCC i 2P'PflE55VflE SEVER
CONCEPR,C DJCREASER(EYP) F
F . � t tj- -
2q•CI'fyY„. }4 �—V flow kElEN.
I ' Llo ,C£IP.:F WUPONC
SECTION PLAN — VALVE STRUCTURE A
SECTION PLAN — VALVE STRUCTUU_ B
3Je. - ..q.
E
cs c
' VALVE STRUCTURES
EXISTING CONDITION
H
H
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT � Qote: le.[A37
DraVEwing Title: browing No.
ACT No.13-1 50 FORT AVENUE REPLACEMENT PROJECT IIIU� 10/24/13 NOTED VALSTRUCiVRES E%ISnNG CONOIC-6ONs C— j
SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS ..
I;.10A
A I<Iav l',A:Ion ESEeI c_1 '
' YL'i LomTm a o l'E 92Li c-a '
>
i
i
H ,es rvd�y_,:. LE .41
r'sEL
rr
I i r
ik-
71
' C '1fMlYtfilAt •• (, I
eAVE STRUCETUIRE B (SALEM) SECTION - VALVE STRUCTURE A (MARSLEHEAD
I
r 1 0 :IFR
'x:a::cenc..vra, Iu R.p»a(rt z rDx'—"-._ ' s
an.M
€ ^. oVR4 [� iitYY Id
?X}Xl SiAt .: :0 rf55U9F
v v V l LT'n SAIF{.
L�,•, }} �> 3➢l� alvv Lfk'?`I%I'
- r` ]9 idt 7 1
rwT j} L '
S.tEVC PE l nl
CON IF
L) VIt X1LGkC'.NIR v. Lrt A.Ei(:Yah
$p t WM1 l0
141 VV � $p NCSSUfi-:kWER
EE n E .L'iFX'SYVOR/R .'MI65":Gs 9Ma VII4.1.r: Toff.%%; k'Lt• � I a-_ �r ti• •y CiAY SU'L,• F €
2 O'UREi
F 11Ft Stili\5'r OV]'FASv , (tee E.'ii LC.%Xj
R laLt. ll. LI �iH"'"" _
t o f V 3 fi S 2e aJ{
20
vrAi a r A: C.S[i",ITT r-s
' SECTION PLAN - VALVE' STRUCTURE B SECTION PLAN - VALVE STRUCTURE A
SCALE 3/e'_ r-e' ems. senfe Lie' r-D' I
I SEF COST AC }'-U SHEET 6 0E 8 LOR"EEL REINFORCEMENT
AND OTHER S`RVCIIRFI.DETAILS USED AT VAULTS
G
G } J
I i
GL va (`ns O D LJLfTl A EO 01 U r 101-I r'x IIA.ER,
' r1 JA E , A NEN Zea,R VALVE STRUCTURES
9% =A L TEMPORARY CONDITION
11 .LL( T. C.TRO LUCIA 5 Lfs J 1, , (V (11 C4DM
Y t9e3 rA Og 4 F.HV_ $vi 1,42 Cf i1 I\ 's'." i
DRAFT H
H ., G
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT Ddte EOTED
:, Drawing Ltle: Drawing Na.
CONTRACT No.13-1 50 FORT AVENUE aRI1C1®Ylali- '; j0/24/13 VALVE STRUCTURES TEMPORARY CONORION C-7
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS `n _
410
6 7 8
a
........--....
A _
A
I '
C _
£{ t m ( l 6
rA15xINC
Ic
-
s
..
C- Oa �' YPi.i:.4 J'
tri¢
i Y H MLY[ll
VALVE STRUCTURE B (SALEM) SECTION — VALVE STRUCTURE A (MARBLEHEAD)
i
D � tt' D,. t
:xxF 17fir &- G err — 2-
EEEPY
1 L6"
f u
2a ZE,CMIPWC 1 t P9 Jl MwE �-
t 1—
# L � ✓iAVCT IW 2 CA1 ALL _ T --.� h I <_
{w 1 VIP 'r ( { �r
2f .^1' ee r,. _ }'li2k$'S'Aflr".• a t }rah'..: -r£�YRlkt j ^ F 5 'c I
IIL/yS' � 4
ry �3'11i.VAL4� - E'.I - i S.wdR
E Y S i —
I
y $
It
jl}r
Ij—
N!'t k 20
' i NL .P G 9.. PRv5U2 CYb_'?
1 i RESSJRF :AG .. • ... ...,.
F SF101L 2c x 2 wN c m
a1CNI =Y m.=)
rs ..0....... 20'- .K -:R
' 29 rGR C0101:W•�':j.. L2 E a4:}t .. .
SECTION PLAN — VALVE STRUCTURE B. SECTION PLAN — VALVE STRUCTURE—A
,I -OHES, v s:,. c} e a"I,, m:5 arnrcr
nue Cn+:n ST-,-Il_ Y, r rna5 I,c a .nt 's
1 O
tMt✓VA
: L To sn " { JP v rJ REN,CIIu<l s v INC ze n C n. ..
VALVE STRUCTURES �
b.Ell,IN 1 92
z t onoon n c]� rL um . nu c<mu PERMANENT CONDITION
n
L: , 9 .VM Ef) ,ri6 �S: . .nE PA. 0(.�IIMN i ,•�Cxt.
DRAFT H
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT g.v� bate: Scole Drawinq Title: 'Drawing No. E
CONTRACT No.13-1 50 FORT AVENUE 6i✓" t - 10/24/13 AS NOTED VALVE STRUCTURES PERMANENT CONOITON C—B
LMARBLLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
4
5 S. 7 ... R .. 9 _.,. ,O
t 2 3 4 -. 5 7.. 8 9 _ 10
'.-:.•DIRE OR RDHOM BOUND BALES 'KALE
A OF STRAW FIXED MOUND —'MuA{BLOCK IS PARIIOlY BELOW REMGVA' ELRATON,
CATGH BASIN UNTLTENP. NEW PAVE I BALED HAY OR STMW \CDN LY PEH SN`E AFO EACKnl1 WUN'DRIVEN
PLACED AND BEACUM SWLPT ElEAN•
A ;
FLLL F90M I
f BATES TO BLTrT k F REN]Jh E1.FVA:ION A$
TOGETHER f " • 1 D:ON PLVI C-B,
STAIRS(DV) L ISTOOD UCP pNOmc ON
I (2 PER HALL] IYMNI Gi RGRE
_ rv0iE5: AND'IEE+NS$OF
aEsvu c raMF r O•Was. 5 0
I o ES: 4VF5 Ix A ROW W/ENO$ (((��-5 '
r�t III I � {� iIG11RY MBUTNG illE A?IACf'Mi 9N£5. I"OE fc SLOPE j F
t� {{� L%ISI AG GNUJXp ` i RI.
P { Y"r .}i.NIERSEOPON
4 ].S£LUHELY ANCHOR EACH BALE IN
PLACE .1 2'll Y WNOW IF '� L.2 y2 t. STAKES "Ac.BAIL R[N9VE.AYO LfSCNtJ OEO0.15
! STUDIES DRIVEN 1HNOOG4 tiE SALES "..�...N' P�4fLl'[BOULDERS ANO$TOiiE FLOCKS
OISCMD
') 10 OFPM OF 1'-6"
MIN.OELOW"B", (IIGCVt FOR$ELECTED BLPCKS FOR flELSE)
9 ANGLE THE VAST STANE IN EACH HF4(T£`.SOILS RLJSE 0.Y SRE TO EATER,
PC55Blfj Ii
BAT£IOWAROS N.PAR.11 WO GLI
gyli ,,{Ijlly�l� «II�{?q i1 y TO FORCE SALES TOc.TNER,: PLAN PLAN .
.T,FREOUENTLY Ixs�fCT AND PROMPTLY
-h I REPNR OR REPUCE EMER,. EMBARKMENT SLOPE
4.KEIP SEDIMENT LEVEL IN EACH CATCH (Y)212'19 STAKES EACH BATE
BASIN'LMP LOW ENOUGH m ALV IO h1:F
SEDIMENT ENTERING DISCHARGE PIPING. *� I MBMKMENi SLOPE' ?` ^INDICATE EON PLAN A$
t I { INDIGICD O PLAN C R
6,PEM%E FROM EACH SUMP ANY ACCUMULATED ? }µ 1 CM4TN0
SEOIMEM ANI DEBPo$ BEFORE ACCEPTANCE "•4'MiP. l'P* GROUND OA.^'P ^WHERE BLOCK IS PAROAEY BETON BID.ELNATON
BY ENE N1IHOINIY:
' COURNE LT RENP/E AHD BACK..WH SUVAME
eACNnu iROM SITE
CJERUF •.
CATCH BASIN / DROP INLET TYPE "A" TYPE."B" ELEVATION
0 0
WLTH SEDIMENTATION CONTROL- MORE: NOW - `
TO BE US
m V!LOCATIONS WERE TO BE USED WERE EXISTING
N E THE EXISTI G GROUND SLOPES IN GROUND.1.AWAY FROM THE REMOVAL OF DEBRIS BOULDERS AND STONE$LOCKS
TOWARD THE TCF OF THE EMBANKMENT TOE OF THE EMBANAMENT _
NTS 2YIYM WWOEX SEARS lFAGM fO>C,
WOMEN MOO FENCI pA1+ 14 1/2 CGDE, SB'MIN. FENCE POST BALED HAY OR STRAW EROSION CHECKS
IMY,e'MESN 51'AGNG pfiIKN.MIN. IB'INTO 6i0UND HT$
L ,•� .-StPAx wnmE(fx•Tro)it
. ._.
n n AREA,TO BE
1--' y Y' •� Pvec rpo GON O OIL .... GRANT".TV R) PPOTIc o.e PY'4flGtm
'y 1Y1 A0•WCWLX SIMtS flN.0 fO
GOOD I,ON A'iIL TO LBE
INE$FATAL Bµ@iI1KlU O MD lOW 6 D
WMER
D J
f2•X 2'IWDWpOD STRIPS MUN MG ` y pp0x AREA
T I i
(j " MOUNT SOIL IN FRONT OF NAY RATE l(R PER BALE)
/ µ Y;l/
. j'd .-WIG.`DR NtLON.MIHB BU ES OF ♦. \
PERSPECTIVE AVIEWDHroncx yyh �I 'tom PARALLEL
°+ $�
MS - Of FC =UNMyyUpdEQ EXISTING GARDE .�
m
TO::
"VhX N1RC iTKE DA%e "10,MIS,
B'uFSN Sv/xI/D)WBN GMJkX]CG Fl9PoD GNFR,. ..../'
rsteN•7oP ND mwBE?�Wx eNur.z4` Ja MIN,+rrNGE Poen SECTION PLAN-
($TEEL'r IwE Oa HAYBALE.. E
jy
E 2 K:—OB DRNEx
3 IB Ni0 GROUND.0 RC.
ME
ilN@9T,t1194p,GP0UN0
DIRECTO"OF ROW — 8 STRAW WATTLE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL
W.to MOVE
J•.»,... s H MHA E MINE xMS
EMBED GEOTEMIIE FABRIC
.K...PUT GROUND -- 1.RALES ME TO BE PIMI IN ANON WIIH ENDS TGUILT MUTRNC ME MNfEM MUIS,
SE�ON 2.E.'N1 BLLF DILL HE FMBEOUm W THE SOIL A DNIMW OF 4 LXNE£ � TOTAL lE Gil 50'O'fMIN)
\;`fIMANTES HILL BE PVtED GONE THE.(9MOIlP NFA9 Mf BOROM OF THE SLOPE- E IA.Su OadUE E{
A ALL BNIS MIL BE FLUOR WIRE BEAND OR TIED MIR MGM$THING. '® IF
F
4 CK
aAH. L
C' , 1/2 RL'SXED SlC4t """"' ^^_,.:fLF54'rl}SUOGRAIF
CL`hS:R!.ENLEH
BE",
N
rN-aA xf
NOTES:
1.1 UTNHM ANIFTRACKING PAD IN GOOD ,
C6 DUGN AND
CONSTRUCTION PEPoOD.
TJF-
� 2� PDJACEM flOADWAY SHALL BE SWEPT ONLY TO R_MWE ANY'MATERIAL THAT MAV BE TRMKED
Sl+, ONTO PAVRAENL[N.Inu 's 1 WIDTH OF MRO" SHALL NOT EiE LESS THP"WIDTH
` 'DIGRESS OF EGRESS.4 WHERE SOILS ME CLAYS OR SILTS. THE MINIMUM
LENGTµ OF ANTRACKING MRO" FRTHECONSTRUCTION ENTRANCESHALL BE EXTENDED TO
W:-T IAO' IN LENGTH.
I E%3TIIi1LE SF RI TFT
nC..ACED 3O.EVAY
LQCBTI9N.HIM
ANTI—TRACKING PAD
NOT TO SCALE
H
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT DbteScale: Drawing Title: Drawing No.
CONTRACT No.13.1 50 FORT AVENUE 1pF SEBA iD/24/13 AS'NOTED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHEET I C-B
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
' - T 4 .. 5 � - 7 8 910
23 - 4 , e 7 g 10 I
A
A
I
SET RCCM Me - � T
i';9IRTY CART."¢
(SEE SPEC.)
I'I 1
GIT
ti
SILL
RRIORY CURENN
(SEF.SPEC)BE SPEC.) E
iEMP04MY �I £
N ! I
• ....... IIMNGfi I.I WAS5
I
NINI
D D
I,
IIf l t
E
i
STRUCNREFFRgNI
,. TOP 5PIC 150
SPEC
5£[ .
FENCE
(SEE SPEC)
E - . .. F
TURBIDITY CURTAIN AND COFFERDAM AT
TURBIDITY CURTAIN OFFSHORE LOCATION SHORELINE LOCATION
NOT TO SCBE NOT TO SGtF I
G G
F
H
H _
t
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT Date' `Sccle [D,C.mg Title: Drawing No
CONTRACT No.111 50 FORT AVENUE / 11>•7 _ �'�T 10/24/13 AS NOTED EROSION AND SEDIMENT-0ONTROLS SHEET 2 C-1.0
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS ..,_..,.�.
- T — — — Lo
2 3 _. 4. . . 5 6 I 7 6 9 10
{
'r
A
A
- _SL ON !RUCK S
vv 1 k C:ff,
'k M"'. E '1 SS I -
24° HPI)I
I e
2'0 '.x—ANSI—,N ANC-10RS f'YP j
EXIST
EXE GRATE IN SOILS
.• N ROCK i
A 6 AIN
,,..
SO',�J P
t
# fi'XN'X�i4'iFCAST
GNCR, SLEEPERS :C '.
TEMPORARY BYPASS
9
K"'S.
D `7AR,I S. (N (-U
HAL SC�ICN Q F SECI UN
EXISEING SEA9ED '- IN SOIL - (A HOCK [XISI:NO GRACE VARIES
VAR ES (4'..' TO 5 •vo)_ oo..✓:, �4•, A30VC M:
RAC< ,LL I LN N VARI ( ITAP SITIO`,
.,lTRECLI• ) NATERI I—' 3 Ou 10 5' Ur;
E ( AT VALVE STRI,CIURE) E
{++ ,c I( 1T?E t.C•i ,>r, W ELL TING MAY HAVE BEEN 1 E - F�
Y/ .,KLJGEL MA13?IAL -S a „AOF BY PREVIOUS CON RAC DR
'- COMPACTED SCREENED
n.
(RAVE. AGAINS 'NDS
icJ 'S: `AAERIAI ORS _ETING- ^'—
R(MOVE EXISTING: 51, _ F i
F 20AND 24 1. PIPES, - _.
__ .GU PACTE.O SCREENED GRAVEL
'�... - - t
UNDISi 23EC MAiE RIF,- AGAINST JNCJSTC n3G' M.ATER!R.L
/' • REP CLMk W R:.SURD MAIN. COM°A. =U = tE'Ln AI PRESSURL MAIN
TF SAN0 CIOIN(„RFFE �A 1 24 CI ' -`
G'N;;HE24 HDr. 9
' CROSS SECTION REPLACEMENT PRESSURE MAINS IN NnIS
EXISTING ROCK TRENCH IN HARBOR 1 MOVE EXIS NG CROSS SECTION REPLACEMENT PRESSURE MAINS IN
2 AEN;) is 01 PP,_& EXISTING TRENCH ON SHORE
G ' STATION 502+001 TO 504+80t AND 556+87 TO G
561 +12f STATION 500+00 TO 501 +00f
1N.LS
N.T.S.
t., ngVs -m t nx e f uraDw�,n low::, Drt wn-rc
IA G A 1Y )f•0. LSiD 1 fIN TL CiC M59( ,I5iH4G 2641L
DRAFT
1. INS_ 0 MN Fl CAI_0 1f[*D29 YS_ J NL
i WR,ii YERH'M1N]G Uk I
Oi JB: (ADC3%:MASSGG .5.15 4 Flt QK � T_S`.^;iFR.
" Date Scale. Drawing Title: Drawing No.
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT '
CONTRACT No.13-1 50 FORT AVENUE 10/24/13 AS NOTED DETAILS SHEET 1 OF 2 C-1 1
SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
,. 7
_.
' 2 3 4 _.. 5 6 7 B
1 2 - 3 4 - 5 6 _. 7. S 9 ._ 1C -.
.._.-. .. _,...,.....___.. . _. -
--27'± ...t
A MOUNDED EXCESS
DREDGED MA ERIAL EXISTING SEABED
DVR "R FNCH I'
- 3
z -PACK Flt.'I,. It.'/ .�
s „1_.. )tF 7GED MA ERIAL
o,
t
As; I
APPROX. LIMITS OF DREDGING
C PRECAST CONCRETE. COLLAR C
NOTES;
1. TEMPORARILY SIDE CAST DREDGED MATERIAL.
AFTER REPLACEMENT PRESSURE MAINS ARE INSTALLED, -. REP..EC_MEN'i PRESSURE MAIN
BACKFILL TRENCH W/ DREDGED MATERIAL. t" _= 9< - "-'--"'? 24• 111
MOUND ANY EXCESS MATERIAL OVER
TRENCH AS SHOWN.
CROSS SECTION REPLACEMENT PRESSURE MAINS IN
OFF SHORE AREAS ,OUTSIDE FEDERAL NAVIGATION
D CHANNEL AND ROCK TRENCHES AT SHORELINE
'I
37 a -. _. ....-. i 1-.. EXISTING SEARED 11
E DREDGED MATERIAL t E'
OVER TRENCH TO ORIGINAI
SURFACE ELEVATIONS a z
z
4 I
1 �
mac,.
z. 3 �' ') BAR FILL W/ F
F DREDGED MAIEd-AL :i
APPROX. LIMITS OF DREDGING
1
o i•-C,ASI ,.ON.,R_:.'E ,^.OL:AR ,.
E
NOTES ......... �...__.�
G 7-,.TEMPORARILY SIDE (:AS DREDGED MATERIAL T C
APER REPLACEMENT PRESSURE MAINS ARE INSTA_-ED, REPLACEMENT PRESSURE MAN
BACKFILL TRENCH W/ DREDGED MATERIAL. 'mom `"9•'_` ""` Zh" HDPE 11. THE I EVAnoNS DEPICTED HEREON ME WED UPON JIM LONER Low WATER.
RLSIORE SURFACE ELEVATION TO ORIGINAL ELEVATIONS nnx Eww 1983-x31,WED UPON nDAL BENCHMARK DAMPING W45 C
TRENCH AS SHOWN, 199]HORIZONTAL
NFROL
2. ME WLEVANOR COMPOL NEiWOflK IS BASED UPON NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
OF 1993 INADB3J..NASY6HUSERS STATE PtPNE COORDINATE STSTEM,
CROSS- SECTION REPLACEMENT PRESSUREMAINSIN
FEDERAL NAVIGATION-N CHANNEL
'
DRAFT
H
.. .._..__._
SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT Date: Scale Drawing Title:
No.
CONTRACT No.13-1 50 FORT AVENUE 10/24/13 9`
MARBLEHEAD PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 10/24/13 AS NOTED. DETAILS SHEET 2 or 2 C-'I Z
i
IIS
ATTACHMENT F
I ' LIST OF PERMITS AND REVIEWS
1
t
it
1
1
Attachment F
' List of Permits and Reviews
Agency Permit Contact Person/Reviewer
' United States Army Corps of Application for Department of Karen Adams
Engineers the Army Permit
Massachusetts Department Of 401 Water Quality Ken Chin
' Environmental Protection Certification
Massachusetts Department Of Chapter 91 License and David Slagle
Environmental Protection I Permit
' Massachusetts Office of Coastal Consistency Review Bruce Carlisle
Zone Management David Boeri
Massachusetts Historical Project Notification Form Brona Simon
' Commission
Marblehead Conservation Order of Conditions under William C. Lanphear
Commission Mass.Wetlands Protection
Act
Salem Conservation Commission Ordeof rde Protection Tom Devine
MaseWetlands
Act
2
' Attachment G
Agencies to Whom ENF Shall Be Circulated
�I
i
1
Page 1
Attachment G: Agencies to Whom ENF Shall Be Circulated
FEDERAL AGENCIES
tUnited States Army Corps of Engineers
National Marine Fisheries Services
' COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
MEPA Office(Director)
' Massachusetts Department Of Environmental Protection:
-Commissioner's Office
-DEP/Northeast Regional Office
' Chapter 91 reviewer
Water Quality Certification reviewer
' Massachusetts Historical Commission
Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management
Division of Marine Fisheries
Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program
Massachusetts Department of Transportation;
' -Boston office
-District 4 office
Metropolitan Area Planning Council
CITY OF SALEM
tMayor's Office
Salem Public Library
Conservation Commission
Salem Harbormaster
Salem Director of Public Works
SCity Engineer
Planning Board
Department of Public Health
' Page 2
Attachment G: Agencies to Whom ENF Shall Be Circulated
TOWN OF MARBLEHEAD
Marblehead Municipal Officer(town administrator)
Marblehead Public Library
' Conservation Commission
Marblehead Harbormaster
' Marblehead Director Parks and Recreation
' Marblehead Director of Public Works
Marblehead Water&Sewer Department,Superintendent
Town Engineer
Planning Board
Department of Public Health
�I
i
' Page 3
' ATTACHMENT H
CORRESPONDENCE FROM
' MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL
COMMISSION DATED 10/15/13
i
t
1
t 1
>
> > .
' OCT 17 2013
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts SESo By .
fWilliam Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth
Massachusetts Historical Commission
' October 15 2013
Karen Kirk Adams
Chief,Permits and Enforcement Branch
US Army Corps of Engineers
New England-District
696 Virginia Road
' Concord,MA 01742-2751
Attn:Brian Valiton
RE: South Essex Sewer District,Marblehead Pipeline ReplacementPrcject, Salem Harbor,MA.
MHC#RC.1421.NAE 2013-1242.
' Dear Ms.Adams:
Staff of the Massachusetts Historical Commission have reviewed the Public Notice for the project
' referenced above. The project consists of the construction of twin 24 inch HDPE pipelines underneath
the waters of Salem Harbor.
' The project requires review and permitting by the US Army Corps of Engineers.MHC will review the
project under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended(36 CFR 800)
and looks forward to consultation and a determination of effect by the Corps for the project.
' Preliminary geophysical data for the pipeline route and a construction methodology is not included in the
Public Notice.This information would assist the MHC to offer further comments on the project area of
potential effect and recommendations for historic properties identification efforts. As the preferred project
alternative is refined, a Project Notification Form(PNF),including scaled existing and proposed
conditions plans in l lx 17 format,the results of any geotechnical surveys and additional information on
the project construction methodology, should be submitted to the MHC and the Massachusetts Board of
Underwater Archaeological Resources(MBUAR)for review and comment,
Undisturbed portions of the project impact area are archaeologically sensitive.Archaeological site
examinations conducted for nearby projects in Salem Harbor have identified one National Register-
' eligible buried ancient Native American archaeological site and two historic maritime archaeological sites
within similar submerged environments to the project area.
' The MHC requests that a marine archaeological reconnaissance survey be conducted for the project.
The goal of the investigation is to provide a detailed archaeological sensitivity assessment for the project,
and to provide recommendations for further archaeological testing, if any,that may be required to locate
' and identify significant archaeological resources that could be affected by the project.The results of this
survey will be considered in consultation with the Corps in order to avoid,minimize,or mitigate adverse.
effects to identified significant archaeological resources,
' 220 Morrissey Boulevard,Boston,Massachusetts 02125
' (617) 727-8470•Fax: (617)727-5128 2
www state.ma.u0sec/mhc
x
The pmposed'research design and methodology for themaritimc archaeological men n1mssance su vay'
should be submitted to the MHC fqr review and comment{36 CFR 800 4(a))by a.qualificd and
regionally experienced archaeological consultant.Systeri atrc sub-hottor coring should be conducted as
part of the survey to identify,intact buried paleosols.The preliminary geophysical data collected to date
for the project should be provided to the archaeological consultant for consideration in the research design'
and methodology.
A permit from the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources(MBUAR)is required
for the archaeological survey(301 CMR 2).MHC should be provided a copy of thc'MBUAR pemiit
application when it is filed. -
These comments are offered to assist in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966,as amended(36 CFR 800) and 301 CMR 2.If you have any questions or
require additional information,please contact Jonathan K. Patton at this office.
Sincerely,
S
Brona Simon
State Historic Presorvation Officer
Executive Director
State Archaeologist
Massachusetts Historical Commission
xci Walter E.DeFilippi, South Essex Sewerage District
Kathleen Winn,City of Salem,Dept.of Planning&Community Development
Kate Atwood,USACOE-NED
Bettina Washington,Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head(Aquinnah)
Ramona Peters,Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
DEP-NERD,Waterways
' Victor Mastone,MBUAR
Bob Boeri,MA Office of Coastal Zone Management
Salem Historical Commission
Marblehead Historical Commission
3