The URL can be used to link to this page

64-92 - Highland Avenue - CONSERVATION COMMISSION -�A�,4�D C��-I -�I� - \A6 \,LEGEND IAA RESOURCE AREA 100' BUFFER ZONE FENCt p EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 1q2 ® PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE \ 0 EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE ` O PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE \ \ 1 •0 EXISTING CATCH BASIN O PROPOSED CATCH BASIN �\ EXISTING LIGHT POLE .� PROPOSED LIGHT POLE 1 \ 1r r \\ j POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT 1 .�. PROPOSED HYDRANT -,3r s EXISTING WATER GATE PROPOSED WATER GATE r EXISTING SEWER LINEr r \ II f 1 PROPOSED SEWER LINE 1cr i ,• �''p�;aSE / EXISTING DRAIN LINE W I \ •••.. _moi i _ p _ PROPOSED DRAIN LINE I / ! ~- �I iAA Pygs / I ' '�'^ / o —_ EXISTING WATER LINE r PROPOSED WATER LINE I EXISTING GRADES I r' \ 80' / DES EXIST. D •,, •j<`'''••,,,• ---000 146 ,,LEGEND 144 RESOURCE AREA 100' BUFFER ZONE --a FENCE O EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 142 PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE \ O EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE � 0 PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE - 0 EXISTING CATCH BASIN p PROPOSED CATCH BASIN EXISTING LIGHT POLE Ir \ \\ + PROPOSED LIGHT POLE 1 \ \\ t o- POST INDICATOR VALVE ` \ A EXISTING HYDRANT 41 PROPOSED HYDRANT e EXISTING WATER GATE 1 / pQ PROPOSED WATER GATE uIII EXISTING SEWER LINE _S _ PROPOSED SEWER LINE •.• •• r a I I J _-- EXISTING DRAIN LINE "co I ! '•... / - \ I ! 1 i �i PROPOSED DRAIN LINE I I X44 / i / o I --- EXISTING WATER LINE v ` PROPOSED WATER LINE ` I a � � 2� ' 2 � ''••' I � �ilr � _ W-- PROPEXIST. DMH I 1. ' � / 80 / ��t'••. i I ---000 == EXISTING GRADES R=140.9 \� �� / \ • "' I l r i . PROPOSED GRADES 1=137.00(IN) 1 I 1 \� 146 �i� © HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE t=135.CI6(OUT) I I �� \ \ \ I A PROPERTY LINE �^ - / l 'R POSES EXIST. CB'S ` ��; v to / ` STONE WALL R=140.7 I \\ `� A_ / / BLD i 77 HANb1CAP ACCESS RAMP 137.40 G 10R�i144• - / �4 000: p ENTRANCE I lel 30 S.F s I DMH =14 $0(lV) PROP. 6'z 12" I I R140 9 ` OUT 62' TS a V 1=137.or/N) \ 10' I 1 II \ \\ \ W 111 I \ 1 i/ 1\tel� s31�� I Iqs, 2 of EXIST. SMH co ERI IR---139 00 150- p'gCO2 ;\SE ER ERVIC�i SEWER S° l I/ It I PROP \\1� R=14jAW I lzl.;2.0pNm j 32 45 W J J / to o 113' a n31 s - I ------ _,y 111111 IIIIIIIII III IIII/IIII IIt111111I1t1111111111t11I111 IIIIIIII1OItIt1 11 i I I \ \ I I � I I I \ 1 W Q r ----- I I I 1 I- f � i • \\ "MATT GARRETTS," I I it USE SCHEDULE ZONING \� - _\\�� SITE PLAN OF LAND REQUIRED SHOWN � HIGHLANDER PLAZA LOT AREA 40,000 3.70 ACRES BLDG. COVERAGE 45 %, 15% IN LOADING BAYS NONE NONE OPEN SPACE NONE 32% SALEM , M A. PARKING 1 128 128 SCALE= I°= 40' DATA= 9 JUNE 1889 THE' FAFARD COMPANIES 290 ELIOT STREET ' ASHLAND, MASS. 40 20 0 40 80 120 HIGHLAN LEGEND e 3Q q�e ^�e � RESOURCE AREA A- --------- 0 J W ----- 100' BUFFER ZONE QCIO e Q Z z-A-X SILTATION CONTROL v W O EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE \ 0 PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE rR 0 EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE EXIST. H 0 PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE whq� R=108. 3 EXIST. DMH <4 R=110.04 O EXISTING CATCH BASIN Ne -oI, PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 1 1 104.85 EXIST C8 EXIST. CB �` EXISTING LIGHT POLE LOCUS MAP EXIST SMH ' '� I=104.85 1 109.87 R=109.75 EXIST SMH ♦_ TT R=108.56 1=106.32 1=106.22 R=110.66 - V♦1 �- PROPOSED LIGHT POLE N.T.S. 1 =103.74 / I=104.68 2 / T EXIST SMH 0- POST INDICATOR VALVE R=112.29 EXIST CB1'105.26 - RR=toe Q -- --___- � _ v b EXISTING HYDRANT I=104.31 w ' / \ a f, 1 _ \ dj. -�- PROPOSED HYDRANT / S44°-I -g7"yy- - / a`� 15 EXISTING WATER GATE R'ioe:8M" ' �\ \ _� ` • PROPOSED WATER GATE I=1oa.98 �• /� __ -_ _I77.00�%_ \ \ Q' EXISTING SEWER LINE 1=10096 �\ ♦ �1_- i`- - r \ \\ r --- SII 1=97.89 n ' -ter EXIST.ce -�-- -^ _^--.-�� v_ g0°, _ \\ ♦ --S _- DELE R=108.28 � 1 !AEXSTINGDRANINE --- \\ / EXlsrSMH = D = PROPOSED DRAIN LINE / RZIIEXISTING WATER LINE �N, 2Q0 \` / - W- PROPOSED WATER LINE - � - �\ \` \ \ \ \\ -000 = EXISTING GRADES PROPOSED GRADES N HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE ' N 120 \ 1 \\ _ 1 / \ � A (F) HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN PROPERTY LINE o \ 1 \ \� 1 I \\ �\ ' / STONE WALL--- -- I � \ 1 HANbICAP ACCESS RAMP \ III I _ d Iit I \ I j \ � \ \ \ � \\ ENTRANCE EXIST SMH `\ \\1 II / _- ` \\\ // , \ I 1i r/r/ / • II I 1III I 11\\\0R=112.58 \•6\\ ? \\ \ \ EX=I1STS M 1=104.63 R=12.71 1 106 - \\\\ \\�\ \ EXIST. DMH /� I J/11j I I �1 1 111 \ 1 I 48 I I / 1 it 1 1 \ \ /3 -_� � \ \ \\\ \\ \�� R=111.79 I iI -- I /I I I 11 I 11 \ \ \ x \ I \ c0\`�\ \ \ \ \ \ \\�_` �\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ I=106.74 EXIST. CB i I //1 / I I 1 \ I I I I I / \ 4$ I >. \__ _ \ Ce ' R=117.79 1 / 1 I 1 1 / I I I I \ 1 I I I 1 \ 1 1 \ "`% Cj\\\\ \�\\\\\\�\ / -� \ EXIST. 2 \\ / ♦ �-_ ��-J R=110.32 \ a EXIST 16 \�� \_\\\ I \ \ /$o\ \\\ \ \ R=110.53 " .N \ � I( i!/t I " \ / \ � \ \ \ \ �-�_ \��•/J II a I n 1 ( ( \\\ \ I \ 1 1 I /4gx I 8 0,C \\ x I \ _�\\\\ \� '_�=`•' /1 ,/ \ \ Ri�� OQ.\ \\ \ EXIST, C8 a, 1 ' . �+ � _ \ \ \ - �_ `L r 00 06 \ \ EXIST. DMH. I i r I 1 111 \\ \ / 1 \©1 / -� \\ \ \y \\ \\�� _1 \ 30-11 00 \\ \ \ R=110.28 R=118.10 1 \ 1 III \\ / - / �\�\ �._ _- _ \\\\ p•� \\\ \ 'I 1 1 \\ 1 \\ \\\ \ / \ 1=111.82 EXIST. CB I 1 I I I I 1 \I I 1 \ \ �� / \ x � `� `\'-` \ \ \ \ \`` \\\ - \� \ RX 99.IIDMH i - 1=111.64 1 I 1 \ \ \ 4 // - _ \ \\ R=117.97 10 1 _ ----_ 0110.79 1=11321 !O I I I III ) 1111 1 \ , � � � \ \ \ / // i, '� �� \ `�\ � \\\ \\\\\\\ \��\`\\ \ / I I I I \ \ -- } � � \\\ / 1=93.44 1=108.46 I I R \ \ \ i`^\ I •� 1 � \\ \ \ �- 11 II //// \ \�\ -- =��\\ \\��\�� \\\�\\� \�•��\a \�\\\\ / � \ \ / y� is 1 90.11 \ I \ \ \ \ \� \ \ \ \ \ --a EXIST.=93.46 �' � � \��\\�\�` \ �, \\ \ \\\� \ �\\ Seo M � \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ / i T EXIST.-C.B. \� �\ \�\ EXIST SMH M 1 . to \ 1 0 \ I \`-// / ` I I J I � C // 1 \ \ - \\ ,\\\ \ \ \ \ \\ �32Q' _ / \ \ / 1 \ \ \ \\\ \ \ � � ^ R=93.58 f 1 / M 1 1 l \ \ \\\\ \\ r 4 1 1 \ \, ��\ \ \ 111 I b (�(') 1 \ /C / / \ \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \\ \ \� \/0 \ �\ I R=123.48 1 \ \ 1 1 �� 1 ' T" I �\ \ \\ �\ \\ \\.` \\ ',. O \ 62 \ \ 1 \ \� \\. I I F/0 1(J/ ,� \ \ _ - �\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ \�\ \\ \� \ \ r / R8 61 MH 1 =117.08 I I \\\ \ \ \ I I 1 \ \ \ �/ I 11 • /^_ /1' \ \\''; \�� - / / ' - -� EXIST. C.B. - EXIST. DMH I I \\\\\\\� \ � � - - \ \ / \• \ \\ �� \\\\��\ - .I _ wo 4.47 R=125b5 \ \ / \ ` \�_ / // 9 r \ �� \�\ \ \ \\- - 3.r9 \ \•\\ \ _ �\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ O \ \\ \ I �� i \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\\\\\\ \\ \\\ \ I =116.62 i \\. \ \ \ /� \ \ \ \ \ 1-116.54 � \ \ • \ � \ \\ \I \ 1 � J I \\ // / \1x8 \\ /j / / � � \ // / // I I \111 ` -� -_ �) \�`��\\�\ `�_ �, \\\� N' ce 400, 17p i7 - , \� \ 46 l / / I h \ I I f / - '- 1 \\ I I 1\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\ \ III / 0 r o ? \ I c'e `� \ I � // I \\ I 1 \ /.� J III � _ -- �!�/ \ \ \�\ I I \ �\\\ \ \ \� \\\ _ C,e \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ I \ / \ \�\\ I I // \\ 1 \\ \ \ \ ' 1 I I I I I / \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ 11 / 1 0=91 -28-4b� \\\\ \ \ \ \ \� \\\\\ `Il 1 1 1\\\ R=30.00 \ EXIST. SMH __ 111 1111 \,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 I I / - _�e�! / _ \ \ \\ 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \ I I I EXIST. C.B. - R=130.78 \ 111 \� ,--- = - 30 \ \\ `\ \ \ I \\ \ \\ \\, \ I I I ` \ L 90' / R-e72B ! I // I ` \ \ 1 _ / \ 1=83.45 �\ / / / 1=129.87 k / / I / _ _ \ \\ \ \ \ I I \ \� \ \ \ \ DI 1 \ / /// 122.48 R=131.' _ EXIST. CB R=131.51 \ \ \ / I _ / / I , I \� -\\ 1 =1z7zz I \ \ - \ 14$/ \\ 1 \\ lI /' \ :/. \ / / l 0 1 Il I i I I I I i I 1 EXIST DMH we R1 =11226.2.07 / N=1 � g' Fly /I2'QbM- eS RV/C£I =124.os / 1=121.65 w4 / / EXIST. CB � /. ,o / I /r R` . �// / / / / / / / / ) / / I I I✓ I / I Oro O / _ - / PROP `J �// \\. / 11 \% \ \\ / / /i / / \ Q 12°x8.. 1 ri \ \_ "\ / 11 �// / � _ 9 I Co \ // / / J // I / I 1 \ \ \\ \ \ TS 81V \ 1 _ `15 . i \ MPgC R O \ / �/ / / / // I I 1 / \ \ \ \ pAo�-/ 1 �\ EXIST. \ S O S_. R=137.87 3� 1=138.36 �pu nunnnn ,n,,,�„ I \ ! I 1 k IIII 1 II I III ,n� i I ce r "•.• I I / 1 I I III 11 // // 'J l l l / / J l I I / ''•• 1 // .,.,, SF \X� ' 1 \I g 1 j I I 1 \� / / I I 1 i i / / / 1' 1 /' I i'�i / B" 1 / k I \ I l PR �i I / 11 \ \\ \ 1 I 1 iI 111/� l .�/ 1 wN Op R, 1D / 1, r'O MH q5�1 • ''•� 7 I 1 1 RdP /38. 96(/ ,,•� ., fis \ 11 i^_ '••. O 1 I - l / / \8 \\ / ) � \I I I I I 111 / // I // 8.8s( NTl VJKK �••• :'S(�,11 x \ I I /' /'o0s2 ' p / - / / / /� ' / VIII II / / / /// // / / / /' i ✓/ /' /�' 1 / l s /i/ , r� �- � ' - _) / Z' CLD x / I 1/ (EXIST DMH11/l =134.14 EXIST.CB 1=125.93 R=140.06 12"RCP l _ \\ \\ I / / Q \ I \ I \\ �- / 1 I I =134.79 / - 1 / 11 I I I I I I \ \\ 1 I I I I \\ \ \ \ \ \ I It I I \ \ \ \ \ O EXIS9.99 - \ POSED/''`\ i AIL mlWB SF SITE PLAN OF LAND N,h. ° HIGHLANDER PLAZA OP - , /?O / or �C# c\/ I N SALEM M A. USESCHEDULE 4 ---`__-, , / /,-/ ,, / ,- :_--/ II I ► / / /// / / / / ► III I I I SCALE : 1 = 401 DATE : JUNE 9 1987 I �\ \\ I E I \\� rl , /rr / / /// j/ / � \\\\ \\ I I I I I I 1 / u ZONING 2 'REQUIRED SHOWN / / 1 \ I\\\ / 1 I I / // / / / \ \ \ \ I I I I 1 I I I l �- / ///r I / 1 ��/ //jj / I \ 1 \ [� - I I -♦ THE FAFARD COMPANIES I 16 LOT AREA 40000 13 Aa I I I 1 I I1 I I 1!I I II III I \\ \ 290 ELIOT STREET 45/0 NSg2 ASHLAND , MASS. BLDG. COVERAGE 16% LOADING BAYS NONE I 40 20 0 40 80 120 OPEN SPACE NONE " 309'0 \ s PARKING 1 561 570 - I a _ 1 1 &r -52A-00 1cli \ \ 1 I rl- \ ` o a WE TZ DS \ \ 2 1i \ \ I l r \ k \ 1VII \ \ oID � a \ \ co I I z \ \ i\. , \ 1. WETLANDS J: \ �. I I l.��i �. \ —o co EXIST r 1 WETLANDS LJ 1 \ \ \ I \ \ 00 I \ \ \ \ \ II 1 . \ 1 V uj 15p0 NO rr \ \ b cn oz o / \ \ \ D 140 , I \ \ CL o W a o � > a acr z w w D J Q TY�>✓E, / \ w -J w cr \ \ \ \ o- W \ z REVISIONS DISTRIBUTION L . \ PUR SALE FIELD 2e+00 / _ - -too/ O 1, \ I LL to 1 1 - \ d 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \• \ \ \ —�` I— — Z /O 2� I W O 0 N N OD_ • 666"' • / � N \ 3 I 404 Q cn p z — l I I /D .BQ�\ \ \\ \ ` \ ;\ - ` \" \ �. / / = \. - ` .:� I .. ' I /I 1 /l i � • :,`' = 0—i O w M — z \\\\\ \�\ .J — 00 // ./ , x \ r I I W — z w Y w Q loo I CC '90 44 N oo 0 FEET 120 40 20 0 40 8 DATE: SHEET N2 :/Exisr. . I EX/Sr. � ION FILED BUILDING wErLAND 1 WETLANDS : �' FI NAL PLAN FILED & o DRIVEWAY HEARING DATE 01.9150 LOCATION PLAN . 1 PLAN APPROVED / P71 � \ \ IF; , - YNN SA D T N. / .FN , � STONE CO. 1047 03 \ ,•� Z y - \ 1I LLA \ -1 m: too01 0z F W a • \ CD Ld 0 ►- . 31-x'00 \ :,_ A'.. - I .<_\ \ V J WETLAND O ' 1 G) N - o \ U1 \ w zLd �y 30{.00 / � � � >- a \\ 0 \ l U w z — - - — W 40 20 0 40 60 FEET 120 q LL) - J W W it C7 <n w a w q W �\ SALEM PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FILED— FINAL f � L.� I I � / \ 1 I � a z �� ` 1 \ _ 1 I / \ 1\ FINAL PLAN FILED 0 :�// \\' _ HEARING DATE /�/li \ \ REVISIONS DISTRIBUTION •,,_----- PLAN APPROVED Pu LIE LD -_, \ / // / ,✓/ . . \ � ,'ham 26 —110 \ / foo go, _ w of \` \ J ✓ /� � \ ' � Xo + / / d I I 1 I 1 \ \ 1I \ _ J Z O N N o0 —tea /_ I ) 1 / \ ` i WW =co cn C50 6 I Q0— cki 9 1 j I i. l ( � 1 1 \ \ \`, Z m o , % �` - 1 � \ h11 \ 1 1 ' \\ w J OJ J W Y W Q .,i9/ / N _ `� ,�/. � . .I / / R " / � . . O ' ' 1 \ , / / -. \ _._ \ \ ' 1 . I 1 .\ �1 Ij \ �\ m -�t�- W z w a O I I I 1 �l D W o o u ►- / N N r f � III 1� 1 l I \ So / --_-ao`-- �� .. . � /, �•j' � r��.----= --�� J � .� \w (` I.; T . ;., X"". .. P i � I .' ( 36� :'� 1 x�5�1 / {� -- \ \ �NAsI✓ 34 1 1J DATi / l / 4y' 4, \ \1 • I / ` �. 1 ' h✓) \\ / 1 \\\ E f S�Fp •, v 1 / t) / / '_'�� \ , � � \\�\ I I`', \��\\ \ / �� / I .- 1 1 �� l� l I 1 \ \ \ SHEET N ° _ IF A> \ �� \ f l / r � � o i \ \ \ \ \ BUILDING AL-F_ iFHA-ESE, 3T_ D R I E WAY 5 5/,/9'50"W ✓4/9• \\ \ - � ° LOCATION PLAN o N. IF LYNN SAND & STONE CO. o 1047- 03 1 6 \ ' \ / 0 O ' = coo — \ COMPENSATING AREA #8 \ _ �� o — �R CO V EYE cn 7500 t SF � p � \ REPLACES 7111' SF AREAS#4 \ Z �R14AS�1\ ��\ -.i � N Fo r- ( 1892 SF) and # 7 (5219 SIFEX/5T ) _ _ \ AS SHOWN ON PHASE I,SHEET4PLAN �� \ +, p WETLAND \\ \ 3 LLI � .. \ » ` 076 O _ 0 /000 - �_ _—/550- 19 0 F- r �p n U� , O �: p F- (D z CD / I a U ~ 304 00 \ \ / �- I c ` o\ v Z 11.1 (f) W -j • > Q / t m w \: ...,� -- \ U) c w = U ocr \• z 4C 40 80 FEET 120 Q 122J `R -- -- - �-- \ W Z C7 Z Z - E � 1 _ . 0- w i APPLICATION FILED 22-QCS-$fi J w D v' 1, a 3 FINAL PLAN FILED--25 FEB. 87U I HEARING DATE - - „o �_ 1 I `1 Gt/L�+ REVISIONS APPROVED FOR - I. C ' -- 25 \ _ •• _ PLAN APPROVED -16--APR B3' SUBMITTAL REVISED 17 SEP 87' iY _ ��+ I� I3a7 1987 MAY )3, 1997 ULY g. ,98-! TJ. ul.v • O `, � .-_._. NV� 6 � / (�, 7 "ak�e?�:v - ^ dx'..,....... - 08.E IC = 114 r - �. SEQ, 2-1 X198 '} 1108.3 L /�� OGT /988 , R -- 1 ' (� -.�{ O.O 00 \. �AcOMPEitS " NV I I R 114.2 o4.g/ ` y. , / �r-�C8 IS . .5 C IJ ✓/! I 1 I A2EA B) Z-7" S NoV 0 , - � r 'Sl ,� 171- A //Dl I! � � -w � I � I � 1 � I � I INV•99.0,. ' . I eX Tc15 \A�. 2 L 1 R 111.2 / 02 _ / I I 1A 107.2., / _ ; - 1' �2 I N CB 24 az . 107.0 2 j 6z LLJ 12INV ;/ - 4.0 / ` N I. ..5 1 INV o0 o I ( cn v v I + I EXIST. Dm I �/i 4 / �� / 11 1 I \ i _ 0- ! ice♦ ... - 1 1 = 1 01. 22 � , \y/® l / I 1 I \ 1'I �' - ( _ R' 105.5 O I /f�S ZJ 1n M M N 0 \. ` DMN / EXIST. GB . / � � I I J / I / / \ I I I p \ // 0 m -e EMIT. Z o n)- I.(s"' 8�8 �/ c - III. I /2 rY }� ` - f- — �- - o 'L lo.s` 3.5/ C� / , ' I 1 71=110 9 \ ' , \ V 0 0 j V W _ Z 40 I O m � w z w a a ' 1'—� 9 /• /' _ !n / - ! )ro < / )j C . lob. I I O I // r cr • �� / _ � _ 11 ' - 18°' {� 1 ^ , ( - JI 0 a I - 101 � _ I � ,(� ! // I }26 Y � ' I 1 ° I 1 OZ �/. I I CB-17 h ,� 1 'C) \ \ � � / • " . A .Q' i F� / \, J. �� I • 101.6 aoMN ' i R- 1028-r I \ 1 - *+ x4 TA 86.84 --- �• I v � ) \� - �i - / 1, = 8�.�i RI`= 95. 3CI�-�--- `\ I `� .3C18 ) _ `\ /. 1 �\ / / � . \\ L• C.G I�! \ I I 2 1 I \\� PX18"� _ �l1 ,� I _ \ o . �,t� I .�6�\ _�,_ — �_ t C 9 1 v 1 1 1 1 �' I � � 1 � --�J_ -�e��'` I _ _ � �4� � 11 c ( � �� 1�^' \, b 3� - u �A - I I ;✓�\ \ Mme_� �. \ _ �/ . 1 F \ \ c s�2 \ / / I \ \ � _ / X / � � �\ �.. �� ! ✓ \ \ �� \ A t /� \1 \\ R = 93o DATE — \ [ `.—. =1Z �- / } I 1 / \ ,� ,. ' I 4 l\ET I IJ 89.0 a l / / / I / // \ SHEET N 4 OF I. 5 / / .A '/ ! �� . I r / I / i Le•- \ \` `� I \ �// \� �\ I \ / � \ \ / rr':/ / } I -_-- ' i �,\ \ GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN m° N IF LYNN SAA'D & STONE CCD r:A I n d 7 - n7-C4.. ' I I , / / w \ \ 1+ ! 5 \ \� / 2 y ` � Z �� a 0 - _j\ \� O � x0 I' COMPENSATING AREA #8 \\ _ \ \ \\ o cn F_- I1 aap _- s �. a I ►= r H ti 7500 t SF \ �p \ `�� `^ m t i, \ REPLACES 7111 SF AREAS#4 r � Z �" � R S I � \ -�, WCL 7 2 7D \( J "1892 SF) and # 7 (5219 SF) EX/ST � _ \ Too \ ;� AS SHOWN ON PHASE 1,SHEET 4PLAN " p wE7LANO \\ \ -- — w 076 G) — — _ /000 - 50- 19 ? F- B ' \ a (n\ w S\ b Z OD — - iw o4 00 0 W W Q Q a. z `t: -j I \ 1 \ \ 1� I �� .. 20 0 40 80 FEET 120 J W r \ \ \ _ Q O 1co ft \ _ / c C W r E r -.. - - H Z — �. _ y o v 1 I I C \ i I SALEM PLANNING BOARD ; APPLICATION FILED22-QCZ-BS-- J J z tt-- /i �A\ I i,.1FINALPLANFILED-_25�B, 87 HEARING DATE REVISIONS APPROVED FOR L}G ` �' - ` 25 ./ ! \ _ ��!/ �R� PLAN APPROVED --16—APf3�8I SUBMITTAL - _ REVISED 17 SEP 87 ti-!OY 13 I'�ee 71, 5 19 t 77.5 t I98. 5 MAY 0 (9 /o 26 .1 \ t - / �l F .x _ 4NV. 108.0 q, 711//97 ;y R = 114 2 lJ ' I / 5ev ZI 1981 ' 1108.E S C --�-- - s 1101c) GT C 8 -19 I V \ (Aoo co.sPEns N I R- 114.2// �r S C 7J / ( ' 1 A2EA ^"B) 9 NoV&g 111 1 = 107.5, I7 - � \ 8X1 TCD �, � �� 12"Rc CT 99 01 R- 1 11.2 ' It Oo I � x / \ I II l I _ J z V O N m —/00 \ '0 ? c �` Ci / \ — 0 0 R to a A1 ) I � � I � v � v o = Nv = 94.0 - , , LiJ _ 115.. , v - 100.0 II I / / // 1 \ ( _ I I I�� \ I cn 0 m o , Vf/ Q z EXIST. DMH I �j, I I / i I ta. On ( 0� - I � I 101. 22 � t0 10 � p M Ex 15T, GB \ I ' I ' I ZO > \ 1?• 10 2.5± R- 5 // {\V m o- �j-�. -' x ..-� \\ pb _._ M\ l / - r / i O / , . / \\ I 1 � \ N � 1 S \\•\ lJ.l -1 J J J W • Y Ow. 2 d Q / r OQ/. .. I I I O 1 I \ \ \ m _ F O U , F i� 9 r n n I/ ' I / o ✓ ,� Fy + s' I{, I / / 1 \ .� I I 1 1 'p \ 0 o N w i w a W O � e •�1 - lOfe. ' 16 � , -, i / � '� - _ R : 10b. Plot. V `� - \ lis = 92.45 ' \ ,� qy� _ '�- � �•'- Y ' 90.0_ -- —._. Ste. 24 , r- - , 1 � -- ' \ / I 85.(,4/.'. '7A ' Sb.t34_ - RExt'9 .35� -— \ \ �� f l 1 I \J I �j 1� 1 �1 I -\ ` \ ✓ S L �, � �A 4 f r Nom' '�" — 4/ 3 �£ �� 1� 1�) \\�� \ \' \ - B I ��III ��. fA _ DATE I � / t 93.0 0 09. Q = SHEET N 4 OF 1 5 • /, , � � .�� 1 I �1 � � �" ,, \ � � � �,.. � \ 1 � % IIS \ � ;!ar � � , � GRADING f J � 1 1 ;- , - v � DRAINAGE i i PLAN N /F LYNN 5A /' D &57-ONE CO -- _ - -- ---- ----- - cn I na 7- n7 ca cv I I— r 4 - - L _ _� T., y T L — so/— Twrnl 2'}" RG-P s = OON %Fr r _ O HC*k. IIN - 111,0 O _ � - r— _ 0 / 114I _ / r _ RFl 1": F{ .5 110 .45 _,/' .i../ f GDM[ E SATI;.Iv ', Iz•FLo�eE - � l_ -- f : 20� �� ,,,' ` 1OZ S 1 - Iles s, _ /03AA l WETLAND AF�E.4 2 P w/Rlr-I�nP G VJ f _..-- - S.F. - l0 0 1 2 _ 7 J ti a P / Y' / x' 1 '/_ $ = O, O Z F�F T Q - C; .`t , —� Li l .c-( llli DETENTION BASIN E _ _ - -� 2 ;- Z lo3,b CFS c NQ SATIN 51l.TATION . _ .1-- ---- ., cvnPEN _ 5 C,D�.ITR f Fi.. nab p ti l I L LI RIP R4 �, t I=11..7 o, s t\ M�/=10LLI 4/ L 1 � f . 0 D I - — _ __ 04 6p �' FL. 1/2'.0 �_ _ f T '�Q .�r — 1 j ` J r 1 - - ! 105 ti� 103 p ° ,- ti3 �RtA a B Al s' -- -~ Ir- RAP 1 ' p , � - ,'.0 - •, _ i - 1- 17 ( r - I ' Iuj� � 05.o- al i r 30 JAN '86 . FL.., c.. �; 'h 14 FEB '86 w/FIF""rEaY 3 MAR 86 " A - � j \\ ' 19 MAR '86 I " F D / AA` ( 1I ! GOMPEI ISATINC24 MAR '86 S AA *- S N , 107 /�8 8 4,31-7 S.G,t / F 3 APR '86 P i HIGHLAND OF SALEM O 110; 2 I H L A N D PAR K j I i I 4fff n 1 , 1 ' X r' , CD u OD ZC)1_1 col � PeN��ATIN� 110 � r --� , '¢ DETENTION 24 I BASINL - t D11 �� 4 . 1 8 ® 47 Ct (D I ; i r it ,1 Ilio i i O t z tsJ WP � 1 1. I FLa�21'6 B. A (A` 1 w/eiN RAP OT as O U Vol - --------- Fc, y II4 , N =� - - -• IJP , �11 v / 7 M110M S), JAN. 16 , 1986 G _ GAP I ,�- 4 OF 14 QVT LI;T ovTLEf r -': -.. i.., r•2 .•r .-r. ' cBsT l(i !—� — 1 (.13x` 10 1 \ GRADING 1 - R' i i 50 1= _�{ ` 1 =no.so i' _ - _ I - - _ - __., a -AUG 85 ' 1 ' 19 MAR 86 DRAINAGE '— —1 I 1 i ' 1 IL 115 ; - /� /G �►'>"'� , . 3 A 11_ 117 X116 R 3 ,rreG•- M/ I 5 SEP 85 PLAN 21 MAR 86 SILTATION taw — �+�1 �tt' r .; 17 APR 86 CONTROL 1047 - 03 C c, q 501— Twlr I 24'r Rc� i L oOJ -1 c; al - --- _ I 1 .: �. ..i _ _ - . .. -- ' , r' may,,, � t '• . I - - ._ _�� OUTI�T �I - _. !. f-- . I 101 �,.,r'- IZ FI,AIGE coM�ENs�TIN� - = �`` ' �-/ WETLAND - - - . a 1 = 1195 � S 1 O \ 20 � / ARES * _2 ,4 MIP'-MAP So : /o3•g4 ? �// / i'`. H i. J v = ` a. , f P , P ` 1 O, 025 fr 'y8. 00WLDETENTION BASIN E � I - r r_ K \�_, \ 9e � •` 1-1/" ,- , _ � sF `ll , � - 3L5 . . . �• � _ -'I% _ . � .. .. 1 }-- RtP f'.4- - \� - dr 1=115. f[. UG� O IF t A FL //�.0 I ® O - C SJ , Ih1/ 10� - i � 1CAMFEtvSATIIV[a - 05 l �p 103 - A • • 17 _ \ , 7+1 MJ.= 108 0+ _ '8 7 6r 123 !: - �0 JAN '86 b 14 FEB 86 Imo,/�'P`zR. 3 MAR 86 F�sl �D A U I / 19 MAR '86 1 VA O i r �- cor�IPE�ISA7IN� r 24 MAR '86 1 7 /�8 J r i / 4, FA � s+ � N / F 3 APR '86 t' 3 s.F '7 _ ti 2 -7i4,c� z' C ITY OF SALEM _ _ �0� � e �_--G�1-_�' � `c� 0�. G H L A N D PARK if I'� K e 214 � � •{ - 1 ,, �� .. �,� , II-1"EA��-'A•' �\ � �� •', r,' ; , , �• 1' '; _ • _ fes. - /,rr' .' ' / FL I O �f,� ,, �-`i y�,sl` 3p ^ O ® SD ® `" � , � , ,i. tl j IZ rtAlZt \ � ` •r. �� _ w/RtP RhP • H GOI� PeNsa,TItJ� •' i l0 � 11 ` RL 0 ,! DETENTION 1 5`1-1O BASIN F�:. II4..o 2 c8' I � 1 1 D M 47 L�GCt�1D o'JTL�r O ^ SES SHEt7 3 . .. -...., ) - d - 0 t'� . i OJrLET Q LiEf�D aIZO ® O �1 J w/cIE RAv t.�OTES: 1 112 JF3 Nn X8575 till ;cry I 1 Hs-�ar/hl-lam , - , __��° - , i > _ Ib ►, �, P.IP- 1 - �._ . . ___ . _.. _ . __. , - ' . 16 ,1986 CAV AN 4 OF - � — 1 1 �. ( 1— � 1 1 � _ t , _ :..i ' +nrw—�+wrly.y+e ...r.wo•..::n. �. ...-n•w e.+,.:..w' L'i �'- < 1 a 'C'� 14 t 1 1 I 1 OUT LGT '�,•.`•r+^.rs �, ,.,,.-•f OU LCT, I..W. Rcl�i9ls GRADING 1 I 1 I i 23 -AUG 85 DRAINAGE 19 MAR 86 117 ; RL3.` r PLAN • ._ , 3 APR 8f - SEP 85 ' . 1 5 1 it 21 MAR 86 APR 86 SILTATION CONTROL 1047 - 03 BUILDING PHASE FIRST STREET W STYLES 1 2 3A SHORT ELL 27 1 16 SUPER _ _ 2 � [� SHORT ELL BUILDING COLOR KEY LONG ELL 13 16 — / I AG ASPEN GREEN SUPER LONG ELL 5 1 2 DR DRIFTWOOD GREY DECK / / - - - - - - - - - -- - — / / I / / I DS DESERT SAND CAPE 2 1 — / / WETLAND / Q G I DU DUNE GREY 8 PLEX — 3 I 1 RC RED CEDAR REGENCY — 3 I _ - I R D S L SB SPRUCE BLUE BL TOTAL 43 29 5 — I / RW NATURAL REDWOOD UNIT 172 128 20 TOTAL AURORA LANE S R N 9j R 1 / p BENGAL LANE D I I 9 PHASE 1 9 �6 I / 9 " THE SANCTUARY" � D S I i R 3 I DEVELOPMENT PLAN WETLAND �g� WETLAND , LEDGEMERE COUNTRY I' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �� \ �P� i LAND ' S END- ..LPHASE 3A] I D I IN a � r — - - - - - - - - - 4, � o^� - - - - - - - - SALEM , MA . - - - - - - 11 /' cqp PSN ` FLYING CLOUD �qN i FAFARD REAL ESTATE AND Jr'HO J \ f I DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1 2UO ELIOT STREET } I ASMI=AND, MA. 01721 1 a I r 1 I l l a \ e D 3 1 HIGHLAND PARK GRAND TURK WAY WETLAND Q 1 JANUARY 279 1995 1 I 1 s N 1 I YFLO,W LAN WETLAND \ 1 I I r \ s DU � I 11 I i\y D 1 Li 9 cJ 1 1 1 � J, 1 1 1 ;' gg v\� HIB _RNIA LANE 1 \ 1 I \ 1 I SHEET INDEX 1 1 1 \ ASE I SHEET 1 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN i 1 R EfR'S V5A'Y \ s PH E 11 \ I SHEET 2 - GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 11 I HAS A\\ 3 4 \ I SHEET 3 - LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/BUILDING/DRIVEWAY PLAN 1 I 1 I 1 < > \ SHEET 4 - UTILITY PROFILE PLAN LAND E D" LANE _ _ \\ oGs I SHEET 5 - CONSTRUCTION DETAIL PLAN 11 PHASE 3B 1 I \ JANUS_ - 1 I WETLAND � \ i 1 1 1 ( L . 1 "TREASURE COVE" I HMSEAREA: TOTAL = 2.98 ACRES _IIIA — � � R ` I ZONES: MULTI—FAMILY (R-3) 1 — — — — \ 1 1 PHASE II \ I BUILDINGS: REFER, TO BUILDING SCHEDULE ABOVE 1 LANE I 1 I LIGHTING 1 I 1 1 I I 1 R ? 1 II RED JACKET 1 0 \ 1 1 1 1 1 R 1 8 MAJESTIC WAY \ 11 11 1 0 1 1 9 'yj \ II 11 QUEENSBERRY 122 \\ PHASE 2 `\ I �� THE HAMLET` I SEWER \ I PUMP \ \ I STATION REVISIONS SALEM PLANNING BOARD WHALERS LANE `1 APPLICATION FILED 1 /27/95 y ( OF 10P V S GRAPHIC SCALE MCLougmuM IV ► I O R \1 FINAL PLAN FILED 1 /127/95 =3� �c4 E. 'sa CI iL '100 0 50 loo too 400 ,p Q � V�ETLAND � 31 3 \ 2/15/95 3 No. sloe y HEARING DATE ✓ �. !p / WETLAND WETLAND \ 1 -- c�STE� / \ \ � PLAN APPROVED IN FEET ) S/0NAL - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 inch = 100 R. DATE DATE 77SA�I EXIST. SMH ST. 8+81 1=112.40 GRAPHIC SCALE C/ 40 0 20 40 60 160 — — — ///� �� ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. YD / i / 51 — ////� / /,/�Q• �/ 1 iil ' SMH "B" %�+/ R=120.8 u7 A" CZ8 / ,' 'G o/ / PQ�1 ;'i%/ "1 i=1 15.89Cr \ ^ 11=1 .3 / vJ /�ti �r,F % 6"1i=116.63I I /— _ Q O 1 ��e 1 8"1o=115.79 -tta _ � SILTATICON CONTf�OL / -� -/ 1105 r U Ld /5C�0 - LIJ E-' Z L� _ PHASE 3B 1\ // / � / � / / �I /� - fes= �, / / I / \ _ _ — - � � " Z Ld� � < � 0 LLI z 0 Li LIJ _j to U Ld a p \ (n p p I // j / � � �/1 \\ _ p W F Z I- z "1= 19 63 - \/ III I I J LEGEND 5 _J EXIST. SM4H , / / // I L l l / it I / //// / - � T �\ fir- Q ST. 10+68 I / / / / /, / �/ \� CK 6� ` '— GAR.EL. 119.5 III 1 /' \ — ` \\ �] LIJ L1J 1=116.70 I / / / X16 / / �11e- i \ Of W p ~Q 001 / �' � -t � I'/ I 1 I . \\ \\ 1�7 RETAINING WALL (VARIABLE HEIGHT) O , Z o p 1 Z - - - EXISTING CONTOUR Z Z gw PROPOSED CONTOUR w ! 11 ' I GA�R.lE7�/-,22.5I LIMIT OF EXISTING WETLAND V- EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLEzoI 11x31 SMH "C" \ / Wr-a w a Z PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE 3`s wAR=122.0 \ (3)6"1i=116.98 _ I O J 18"1o=116.71 II I 1 0 \\ \ 1 \ \ \\ 1 -- 1— EXISTING CATCH BASIN \ \ ' / G•\�. �\ - -4„W _I-I 1 - J/ No \ J I 12"1=1 13.8 II 13 PRCPOSED CATCH BASIN 12+ FLARED END 1/27/95 - - � — EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE APPLICATION FILED T \ \ l 1 \ L n 1 1 I \ \ — FINAL PLAN FILED \\ I DCB I 1 I \ J I PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE 12795 / / 2 I�I I R=117.8 wl� I \ I \ HEARING DATE I � \ --------` SILTATION CONTROL 2/16/95 J \ 1 12' Io=114.0 9 \ \ 1 i PLAN APPROVED 6"1=1 18.66 \1 \ 1 I \ \ EXIST. SWHI r\- t,. \ \ \ III I 1 I \\ \ SLOPED CURBING ST. 12+6i9 I I I \ \L 120.40 1 1 I I G . LI=,2s. \ I \ \ \ \ 1 I 111 1 \ \ y I \; SALEM PLANNING BOARD ` '\ 1 13600 - I I13+ I I I J 1 I �'; �r�\\ `\ \ \ \ ;\� ` \ NOTES 1 . SEE .DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLANS OF WHALERS LANE APPROVED JUNE 20, 1985 BY THE SALEM PLANNING 1 I \ GAR.EL�1\22,5 � O!i \\ \ \ \ \��_\ BOARD AND RECORDED IN PLAN BOOK 198 PLAN 67 I M \ H�Y D. 11 \ I / Ir \ 13 O� i' \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \I IN THE ESSEX COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS. I I 1 \ l— 1 1 ; \ \ \ 1 I I 2. HAYBALES AND/OR SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED AT TOE OF \ 11 I 11 SLOPES AND/OR BASE OF RETAINING WALLS PRIOR TO , � 1 r \ `I CONSTRUCTION IN AREAS ADJACENT TO DESIGNATED WETLANDS. o 3. ALL DRAIN PIPES 12” RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. /1 I 0 Ij l f 1 \ \ / \ / �- l 4. RIP-RAP STONE WILL HAVE SOUNDNESS OF 1.2� LOSS-AS DATE I / \ 4+�_ \ \\ ND \\ \I 1 I I I I PER A.S.T.M. MAGNESIUM SULFATE TEST. r ` 11 I I ' \\ 1112 I 5. ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO BE UNDERDRAINED. REVISIONS PHASE 3h \ I I I 8 I= 2 .R4 \ 1 �1 \ 1 \ \ 1 v 1 1 \ t \ \\\ \ 1 \ \ \ 6. THE CONFIGURATION OF ALL COMPENSATING AREAS MAY BE rr{ I 1 I \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ 1 ALTERED DUE TO LEDGE OR OTHER OBSTACLES ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION BUT THE REQUIRED REPLACEMENT j WETLANDS WILL BE MAINTAINED AS NOTED. (D.E.P. FILE NO. 64-92) NO COMPENSATION IS REQUIRED C i \\ ,1\ \\ \I \ \ — 1 \\ WITHIN PHASE 3A. W .� GEL. R. .� 1' \ 1 3Q' \ \\ 1 1 7. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BUILDING AND DRIVE LAYOUT. 8. 6'+/- SLOPED GRANITE EDGING AT REAR OF ALL CATCH BASINS. \ \ \ \ I I + SILTATION CONT EXIST. SMH \ \ 1 l��\ JAME I=126.90 5 \ \ 1 1 1 \I �'/d� \ \ \ I \ \ ►LOUGHiLIN Iv m \ I I I l _ - - \J ,///✓ / \ \ \ I \ l�� = CIVIL y 40 cNo. ae aI I 111 / ✓ I ) 1 1 \ ( \ s � 1� io � I � 1 I1t\\ 11 \ \ DATE: zr Zro,2WQ'n' \ I I I\ 1 I I I 1111 1 i l� =1132 1 / / \/ ��- -_— 41 1111\ 1 II II \ 1 131 t\ I ( 1 / \ �\I` I GRADING \\ k \ \ \\ ' 1 I \ - -1 / �=__ � � / I -- \\`\ \ \ I 1 AND \ \ \ \\\\ I 10 \ _ - / \I J / \ / I J \\\` \\\ \ \ \ DRAINAGE \ \ \ \ 17+q � _ I� / / \ I \ \ 1 \ r( . I I, r J I \\�t�\t\1 \ \ PLAN SHEET NO. 2 OF 5 1047-08 D2 i GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 70 40 60 160 IN FEET ) / 1 inch = 40 ft. / �x°oJ . . - i In o 70 / / SLOPEDI I S F _ r U X CURBING J W N N O °O / [TYP.] / 1 (n 1.4 Q� z a [-4 z z Qw ---D < a SIGN FOR – / ' — 0 O W Ln 0 UNIT #s /� I / z 0 W U W F < ly LL) es- Cn / 1 J LEGEND z W -z Z r z z W < a / , �000000o RETAINING WALL (VARIABLE HEIGHT O � '*oo �a; I �10� W W z Y) 0 0 / / �"� - - - -100– – – EXISTING CONTOUR =�J i �/ \ 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR Q II < a LIMIT OF EXISTING WETLAND ►� EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE w Cr / ' ;. J ` v PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE N O l e I � �— EXISTING CATCH BASIN o a 1 — SALEM PLANNING BOARD wv PROPOSED CATCH BASIN SIGN FOR? 12+0o I — UNIT s \ I 1 = SILTATION CONTROL # PHASE 3A — 1 I i Q SLOPED CURBING I DATE I pit \ 3+00 I Q l 1 1 1 �- - n �Q 41 113 / h 1 1/27/95 1 5 / APPLICATION FILED PLANTING SCHEDULE FINAL PLAN FILED 1/27/95 RHODODENDRON 18"-24" HEARING DATE 2/16/95 ARKING \ � SIGN FOR AREA I / I �1 JACK PINE 4'-5' PLAN APPROVED UNIT #s 1 = (1YP.] 1 14+00 1 �,Ia , � 150 wan I I FLOODLIGHT \ \ / 1 RHEINGOLD ARBORVITAE: 18"-24" [3' O.C.] C 1 i NOTES: 1 . PLANTINGS MUST B_ LOCATED SO THAT VEHICULAR ACCESS REVISIONS IS NOT INHIBITED WHEN FULLY GROWN. 1 50, \ 2. AREAS THAT ARE NOT DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION NATURAL C(U� — 3. ALLALL OTHERMAIREAS THESHAIL BE LOAMEDAAND SEEDED. j 1 1 11 �� PHASE L 4. PLANTINGS SHALL SERVE TO REDUCE SCOPE OF LIGHTING. I !Z4 1 Q 1 15+00 SIGN FOR UNIT #s e _ _ — — T — / \ ✓ \ =3�p %�✓ q o v�- at. N NtLOWNU M CIVIL -4 NO. 31913 Q Go Inc/STE�� ` I 1 � 1 1 16 00 1 1 I DATE: Z 7 r�itl Q✓� 1 11 131 1 1132—Ij i � � - LIGHTING, 1 1 1 `1 1 LANDSCAPING, BUILDING, AND 117ioo � _ — J r I DRIVEWAY PLAN SHEET NO. 3 OF 5 1047 -08 D3 -------------- M EXIST. SMH ST. 84-81 I=1 12.40 i /k i 4 i Q 0' 0 C) / YD. W F- Q F-1 Z N Q W SMH "B" R=120.8 130 - 0- ~ OSl "A• 8"1i=115.89 o 6"1i=116.63 UJ 8' 1i=1 .3 O8"10=115.79 Q PROP. Q o Q GRADE o � o I m g Q; z W a W 04 'L' w / / \ = O ZLL 0 FQ- 61'1= 19.63] \ Q d N w EXIST. SMH / / / / 1 20 W Q ST. 10 t68 GAR.EL.1119.5 Lu S 1 � F"y •• 1=116.70 / / / / / l / EXIST. GRADE NLLJ oo // �I=116.i I I . . _ . . _ Q z 0 04�\ � �, 13 {� 0.006 143' OF 8"_@__O-0 0��6 3 AR.Ey.=122.5 8 g5' OF 8 G; . SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1�� , I� 6"1 117. �/ ' I / SMH "C" I I I R=122.0 l I / (3)6"1i=116.98 r� / / 8"10- 116.71 E w 1 1 0 3 G.V. � I- e - - - - - -4"W-I- - - - -)- _�12"I=113.8 1 112+ ¢ I II [FLARED END] 6"I=121 .418\ 11 I DCB l ` I 1 R=117.8 DATE 12"10=114.0 SCALE: VERTICAL 1 " = 4' HORIZONTAL 1" = 40' - - I 6"1=118.66 EXIST. SMH 1 1 ST. 12+69 GAR.EL�125.2 1 I I 27 95 1=120.40 � ' i 1 1 `- I 136 I APPLICATION FILED / / 1 �I11 1 1 I 1 FINAL PLAN FILED 1/27/95 13+01 I � HEARING DATE 2/16/95 1 LEGEND PLAN APPROVED - 11 - I I 1 I 1 GAR.EL.(=122.5 ---, 1.HY D. 113 --�} EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE I 1 S C PROPOSED DRAIN MANHOLE ✓ 1 - 1 EXISTING CATCH BASIN I 11 I REVISIONS 1 - In PROPOSED CATCH BASIN ' 1 'n ^E) EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED AWER MANHOLE I 1 1 1 I 6 1= 21 .24 SLOPED CURBING j 1 i PHASE 3B 11 I ! , 1 q ' I i 1 11- w - - �,, GAR.EL.=1 .5 OF M / NOTES �p I 1 +q° 1 E. N I 11 N I 1. SEE DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLANS OF WHALERS LANE uoCIVIL IV y 1 ` APPROVED JJNE 20, 1985 BY THE SALEM PLANNING S No. awro m 1 n ` BOARD AND RECORDED IN PLAN BOOK 198 PLAN 67 I 1 o IN THE ESSEX COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS. %TE�� ON 2. EXIST. SMHI ➢ 2. HAYBALES AND/OR SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED AT TOE OF 1- SLOPES AND/OR BASE OF RETAINING WALLS PRIOR TO ST. 15+65 CONSTRUCTION IN AREAS ADJACENT TO DESIGNATED WETLANDS. 1=126.90 1� DATE: z> 92t I ➢ 3. ALL DRAIN PIPES 12" RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Iz 4. RIP-RAP STONE WILL HAVE SOUNDNESS OF 1 .2% LOSS-AS PER A.S.T.M. MAGNESIUM SULFATE TEST. 5. ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO BE UNDERDRAINED. 6. THE CONFIGURATION OF ALL COMPENSATING AREAS MAY BE GRAPHIC SCALE ALTERED DUE TO LEDGE OR OTHER OBSTACLES ENCOUNTERED w 0 70 40 e0 160 DURING CONSTRUCTION BUT THE REQUIRED REPLACEMENT I WETLANDS WILL BE MAINTAINED AS NOTED. PROFILE (D.E.P. FILE NO. 64-92). NO COMPENSATION IS REQUIRED WITHIN PHASE 3A. ( IN FEET ) I inch = 40 !t. 7. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BUILDING AND DRIVE LAYOUT. PLAN 8. 6'+/- SLOPED GRANITE EDGING AT REAR OF ALL CATCH BASINS. SHEET NO. 4 OF 5 1047 - 08 D4 Ln n. rn Q TOPSO/L0 W Q'+ E-, n t=. / (n N ly ' CONCRETE FOUNDAT/ON a z Q a �.: 31min. WALL J i FINISHED GRADE O of (f) w W U > W cr U] W t CU p J ,t./: •y ��i'/-- GRANULAR CZ 4 Z QZd UNDISTURBED SOIL BACKFILLCONCRETE SLAB o Q NOT E: RETAININGWALLS TORE CONSTRUCTED ABSRIPESOPED U) IN CONFORMANCE WITH MASS, W z ow PRECAST CONCRETE MANIHOLE a � `'- CONSTRUCTION STANDARD 6E51E204y / TO OUTFALL „\ Z S II g J •. ...• •..'V / G 9 FEET OR LESS IN DEPTH z :... , a a W _ � 0 T N MA NARY GEO-TEXTILE w H sac+\c.n Avco Cv. Yd fsT•Mo•Ro MANHOLE O .'• 1 �'IJ.' �f. 15 •C�• �.IM. . � W 2' 1 J LLI P":0 AND CovER SEExcz.bo-xc:.e c Q� `. 1E t , 6.0 \12 . 38 O.y58 Q Z ® .O U x4"±I" eRlCk] M•r RE ufto ;OR •u.S :20. 16 Z DIAMETER!, FRAME TO ETrERT]. IO.O �q•� V "—/2"Cf,7USNE0 GRAVEL N F FRAME TO eC ]ET IM `V W FUL BED OF MORTAR 1•G c 1. 1 O y ( e'MIN. (/� • .e I 4 .:.,. I . 2•S 1.528 • J ..• t / SALEM PLANNING BOARD o= SEE JOINT DETAILS \ `�% \ \ \ ,;,,• rl ,, -1' \�\ \` u ;, u i • S.r ' MORTAR ALL JOINTS ~\� TYPICAL FOUNOAT/ON DRAIN V. C N • A_ NICK IZSG.IM. STEEL \ oI. - PER VERTICAL FOOT,PLACED DRY TONE ETA/N/ rs. •e'• I• DIAMETER R NG ACCOROINO TO AAEHTO WALL Dn1aN•rloN MISS WIO L N. T. S. SPEC. FRAME AND GRATE 8"CAS7' IRON FRAME S. MIN. / V I-IF] SAN AROUND OPENING] / FOR PIPE] L' DIAMETER •ND OVER, 1•COVER ` I FULL BED OF MORTAR. E' CLEAR 1 FLOOR of LAID CTUFLARE To Of /p B FRAME AND TOP OP COURSE FORN --- ]o MAX HuorRs LAID Fur �— FTHR�O GRADE ADJUSTMENT. DATE k CHIP] AMD MORTAR OR CrMENT CONCRETE Cuss 'A • . c� (IF HAND MIXED SEE LATEST • L4 1/27/95 • _ li o-a N-4 SPECIFICATION$) • ,� t , .� � APPLICATION FILED PRDVICC V•OPCNINGS•EN �INVrRTCD ARCH WITH •• 1 L. 6 "M/N. FINAL PLAN FILED 1/27/95 `V ►Irf OINis To or •PICKS LAID ON EDGE �I RECAST IN RISEN SC CTICN} •� � l m 5/LT FENCE -24TAPER IN THREE HEARING DATE 2/16/95 - VOTE -FOR CESCRIPTION],NATEPIALS,AND CONSTRUCTION METHOD], SEE LATEST SPECIFICATIONS L Q - -_ • /B" " HEAVY DUTY \ ' ; INLET ET OR FOUR COURSES PLAN APPROVED I' CLEAP FENCE POST S*mile. 5• NIM • I PRECAST UNIT 6 — OUTLET PIPE cw_ u 2 � REVISIONS„ f „ 1 • MIN : COMPACTED b•rIN 9.4CKFlLL Z" r1 Uw•1 I}MIN IN \ ` _ 4 '-O"D/A. M/N/. PRECAST BASE CLASS 'D" CEMENT CONCRETE ^ _ 8 OR PRECAST SECTIONAL ' PLATES. 611 �,� �/ ,� l.• - 11 /; / mi I•CLrAR .• rIR '� o �,. t IY•-It-c.4t�aL r DRA/N CATCH BA SIN LL- 19 CIO 112.6�� BLOCK OR PRECAST DRAIN CATCH CAST IN PLACE BASE vA�l ES BAS//LIS iI JOINT DETAILS BASE DETAILS SILT FENCE DETAIL N. 7.S. MASS. O.P.W. — MARCH 19T7 N.T.S. �� PL.IA.1 -IT1N•ly ?All'' t 202 .4.0 N•TdS 1 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE FLARED ENDS NOTES R- W_1 1. SEE DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLANS OF WHALERS LANE --..s•— .-,, 1 - G `_' APPROVED JUNE 20, 1985 BY THE SALEM PLANNING - T -_ _ --- -- /i BOARD AND RECORDED IN PLAN BOOK 198 PLAN 67 TT / N �' I _ / W zc'Lt 'hIN THE ESSEX COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS. RE • o Rt POAGAAY 2. HAYBALES AND/OR SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED AT TOE OF SLOPES AND/OR BASE OF RETAINING WALLS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN AREAS ADJACENT TO DESIGNATED WETLANDS. PLAN PLAN DATE: 7_;!ngl�000 ' 3. ALL DRAIN PIPES 12" RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I-. _C_- .,. E--.+ —.- k ^� •,,.. _ ` , ( ; 4. RIP-RAP STONE WILL HAVE SOUNDNESS OF 1 .2% LOSS-AS PER A.S.T.M. MAGNESIUM SULFATE TEST. i Y 5. ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO BE UNDERDRAINED. y \ ' CONSTRUCTION fCC,ION SECTION -- ' - - " ' -- �- � 6. THE CONFIGURATION OF ALL COMPENSATING AREAS MAY BE I INLET [NO ouTLET ENC SECTION T-T ' ^•l�' ; ALTERED DUE TO LEDGE OR OTHER OBSTACLES ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION BUT THE REQUIRED REPLACEMENT Id:�rT�' i-? -' oTc pec• e • •°"•••I��: s a;M. WETLANDS WILL BE MAINTAINED AS NOTED. DETAIL I: i' R' T 0'.-01 . { T_r r 11 , 1;;} t �t . . .- .E.],-'._ TYPICAL_ (D.E.P. FILE N0. 64-92). NO COMPENSATION IS REQUIRED ( OM,t =�'T_ 10N DRIVE CROSS SECTION WITHIN PHASE 3A. e 3 , t i t i: .= .1}: •� S I 21-'44.,_ : ' t I VARIABLE WIDTH PLAN } 7. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BUILDING AND DRIVE LAYOUT. • i`T. t Er.t_i�.E :-..-r�.. )I J; i-i nl ri .'j ,. !. A' TS a BELL a SaizCT PIPE 8. 6'+/- SLOPED GRANITE EDGING AT REAR OF ALL CATCH BASINS. SHEET N0. 5 OF 5 I 1047 -08 D5 I nt/ F A 3o HIGHLAND REALTY 77 'T ~ REALTv� - TRV�T 4 / L A � PEQUOT zo rct l h cu ASSOC.Ar 4? Net F- T-I r 1 8j'�s S ^- SALTZ F-AM I LY V I NC EIJT I TRUST P0"l CHIP 1 J T q i co; c. � f 0 r � 8-I _ RES S., 90A N F I IZST 2.^ / ,--, r 29. -,�-• - .. L-- _ _ w f T Y' : f l .j ; '�`'t, PEquor `' ILs-Q _ -- �_ 14 Iso 151 CCTY OF SALEM 11J ---r- \ �� : 1 ; 1 oJ1 `'G�- _ -•� ?' - • • ,. : n.651 ry HOUSING AU H RIT � �N \ 1 ` , O � 99.g9 LZ A-Sim vu v iO4 t /so ` J$1 AS /� � W 1 1 � o / / Z.-1 � Z'L \ ao3.� o `��, 1 � O 1 �- _, `- -_ ' o r �-•-- . . • . .r J t" $ t4 . J w� l 99 t pt� Y 1 lCVTOF' SALEM _CcoNsv. COMM) � � Isz . P �.r f e � 1 In.s v �• 4 l - r c 1. \ o '14 CITY OF SATE M � CHOUS I NCa AUTHOR%TY� 1 � 11 R-3 3 00 : � ,,, / �✓ 73 -- =- � �" '• .- .�" ; r_ ITY of SALEM 11q i? \5J<0 lCONSV. COMM. �1G foo 11'1 r Mxg v I , - � � l vJ �Z 1 , . • — ° tl`► —�-"- n Z'b 266 p ( Q ; \ ', _ ��___ .d �� pp.0 3° 40 Toy.��C.bowa_ ST2Lor_ .. yam. - 1 38 - Z•r' � Y CLS \'" 1L'1 It t> w w ,yc. 10 V All N J o / O/ Go p \3S , rig ° ZouE. MULTi ' �At�l. s-3� 2uoL1s Sl _9 �tuit_T\- FA1 �, QGS- 3 140 139 C�5 SHOW►J WITH 1L.Ol►-SGS' = -14-It. a1 4 I 3 Q �.,y1 - `�- 1 1� t vyNA or 11 E S JP; R� 1F:r PRELIM ) NARY PLAN . \ �Sa.cN $utL.o1.0 \s A 'Poop--?L.6x) = ASS (RzoPox�o>• j � 1t„OI�JGS: Will 1 f 3 141 --- -- Pi SLI °�e�. `op- �"` O F LAND I N Uu,TS : ToTJst. _ �55 'k'�Lo> �4uwrs/$L o' �07�o c�u,Ts. f f_ •.::�• SALEM MASS \ r N 1 �GL�b\T S (L-LO L�0IT S C q Forr:: r y C > 14 .1 PG¢�s c•O (�L�tTs P6Q.•�c.2E. � E N OWNER _ NIGI-ILAND FEALTY TRUST " NO.2;.655 y 1- ETITIONER : LEDGE MERE Ll VORPORAT1oN ao \ TOTA.L L.E�GTN a g'� ZOO * Fr. �u T) /1 Q '2rN�� SCALE ' I11 IOOr NATE `-'I FEA. BZ o)TQ-rwET fE,,tTm-%I t TOTA L- L.cu GTµ Z.ooO I �{� 11 56( e"" �\ Q SS NE9: 1 VV 11 � o �x L, ENGIER ROSRT Ct- . MASCHt " R.LS, - , _ _.:_ pTA t„ • -O . ° 1 ` 290 E LLOF ZREET -Sa 5 o- A5HL.AN-D , MA5S. �-a ------ --.,;, Tr=L. N0. 617- 881 - 1600 OWE, 14 LINE � - - T J /� N��r" SYLVESTER / �L.o, o �h• -L�C�L- a Jrp : S A � SHEET NO. I OF- 2 kc) 10 47 -T a, �y 1 O Q7 q Q v P °Q Q \-A CA AVENUE Ave, i I l �11 5 3,000 _ A AREA B2 _ \� zo�E , °' (o,b•- AG. 2 ';\ LINE • � 31.21 p \� 450 N�F• LOUIS ARVANITES \ p ASSOL,IAT[5 a I P ti° N/ti cq I r7 Y SPI NALE 74 N/P • � rA9 SPINALS >J/P � . CITY 0 ZesiraNAa 3y SPE/NC.E /S° J ' SAI EM 715,43 23.59 8.°no y , f �a0 � ri 100 %1 S.{ ' t ZOIOtlp ( J / ' 17a:b ',�. j 1 i • .. SAE LX � e \ 1 � 4}fi' REALTY TRUST c0.zu°` , co oa y ✓ � � I � a, � v �e -p ARE o 130 < 1 27. 1 C.i M ° Li F, N E } : h� oIle ,Ixx ,, \ 50 rn R E 1 S,co Z s ° i * i -3 �AUL.T, ,oM. � t^'. 7-c- -LO,OE -To TOVU5) � 3P 1 Q (j n o V h 1 P174x1 �LDI OO O ` 1 93.16 o t /, N/F TuQUST2l 1�LLco2 PQ.EI� - �5�b00 t 5,�1 1 4t 90 eo \ \\ � O ASSOC IATES � ��TAIr uI L.O1or, FLc cL Q GA = 350 ,000' E A 61. r \ � l3 0 1 QAC 0 _P76?. 7,04s.Tp "'R.5' L, 0> _ ± q$ \5no �T. 13p 130 �QOP, Z , oP \fLS ST, 2000 �T. o S'' ° ORR;Sr�ns� PRELIMINARY PLAN _ / • . tlBKi NAOH17 ti OF LAND . IN xlT.p 2 � 1eT� � SALEM MASS. T a5 7 2 I 1 \ ? 8 fs J HICaHLAN'D REA TY RUST R ET + EMP 1 /o otOF OWNER HIGHLAND REALTY TRUST 1 '.. r. ZO &-tic - it � 3r ROBEtir °� PETITIONER% LEDGrm RE LANb C R3 ZONIN4 00 pr.- jos E C RPOgAT10N p Z0 WE _ - CITY OF SALEM �� I \'u / T STREET MaecHl (7 A'a=f'`�O ^�FIE' �' ) r� L ii (GON6V. COMM `0x3 N A }— po94395`p SCATS � 11 I�a � DATE 4 IyE82 dt- a 4Suu Q J N/F• ,G ENGINEER ROBERT I—. D 'RkL .. �'�"��' E. MAg�HI A •� 1�REAlTYD 2 90 ELLITT STREET TRUST ASHLAND I MASS. a 3 TSL. No. 617- 881 -1600 SHEET No. 2 OF Z 1047 y Iry ID S � )(f//j/ j �""✓",.' Cwt/^.. _` / wJ � ) k! '•`y�" \ tip P/ � ,'.� { � .�• ,-� � +p ��.�`�C,} ::✓C+ C3 N fJ Y ^/ N ._ . . � FYI. � � '"�� -few..(''+"� .Y. •�' `n' ::r 1, J , y, ,y`' �`\\ w ` y ';h ,•.. .�-°rte: A � � � �✓ \ � \Gd' ._ nl � ,..... - V,__"_....�..- i , `✓.. � -, .� �.j' �� a �--..''syr Y` T ...._..--„•,•..,..._--••”' \ . .. ,-T' � ,� ( "lam•-,��,/,.. L p 1 El ....,• C /.....Y O A�... 1(1/ ,./" O X11 . ..--'--....,r.+,s:][l'-� . - C' C. � r'-. ,, r+. .. .... - � R ✓ . ,;�-e^ ..r'-� �`-� rte.. �" �,_�� r fes' f r ':-. :✓ - ,:oa":moi' -.w • - r / • a �l.I'•"''tir`n' ` . y { . .,.•...� a. -..-.�..-^"-•hR 7 4.c-" 1 .` ,:' i t Y,1' :4�..Y IA :.. �J.'...! " `' •' - ..-,._.. ..�.,r : _�` ,, .. . - � ..fit t� y ., ,i,,.�- , • ' 't*± L mac_ _ >..oll o + n n C. �, x 5Hc1_tesL -i1' _ • � \\°u,�r' � � � � , -+.� '- � yam`. � � „ /'�_I �� 11 / t+� � �, � t • u _ „• . ., ter. 1`. �. ` �� \�\ � (lCtj ,sIN CA— UD \I� i� 5 • o � 1 A&i2 � Is3 COKPst�,.?laTlou G>� r , ` 7 i Ip , I , i pr i CO IA lf i � ,,.. ; I \ ,. iii, 1 f' � -_ Y � _ �•_�..``` {' � � r ow 1 i It 05 cc it z t L �A "�� '" ��J �" 4Lt t° �� T2s:, j� � • �' 1 Y v� 1 1 �• .. d r z 4 ,`^ham, ...._...,... �.—..----.+. ......w....»-f...�.+..................k..� ... .w»+ 1 _ .w • \� Baud 88VZ03 Fam! aWetaaM 64-92 Re W pwlOMaya6pq Aa~ Greqq Marren -- PARTIAL ' w Certificate of COMPliance Massachusetts Wetlands PT$GCticn Act,G.L a.131,$40 ' DEPARTRERI OF ERVIRORMENTAL QUALITY ERGIREERIRG N FAFARD CORPARIES - �haPo' a_ To Attn: Ronald '1111fan 290 Eliot Stem,` s_.,__� Wama) . (Ad4hW Welke a February 24, 1987 m TfdaCaalaatakkwadfawodcnlpNakdbyanpndarof Gre9a Warren yydOct. 4, 1984 ►'btUadt0 mdkeuadbylN. -ve-Narment - .a• 1. O Itklwa owEoduWmawwkfOCL4& dbythaabovot fxencedOMarofCordieonehaa N baaa=sdwW**m Pkkd. 2. O nkhefabycwmw6Wc*thofog,,now,uon.a6uwakrcZMWbye..wm to arcwCMerarCaa9domlmvabaengUefaekr0•wagtlefekmWCer68eatnofCampOerge ' ' daeemtkdadrne edbaproJep.epetl(YWWPallonsuelncludw.) Parcel< i and ti .. • �: .:✓.us e:xr��-y�rJ._-ss-,=Y- ';"_..., �-.�c� ; .� - . ,per, a. Olnklrnbra.mkuaWf6.wgknp�padE're»a6M..r..e.doNlrolCl'oitdmaurw : _� • � .. ' IMwraaaanallaw.llwddwof(kllOtdq�akskgadandkOwataa mknOarvaaf.Notidunr Welt WbfaaltomWdadonundxnn AelmaybaopnmalgadwW118nai MW NotlOaf Nkn! Lal ncYdnyanawOnlerotCowapu, . &f r 7•�1' 1t ea��oy(eyyyy 8�874604 s. hF 'TNnanNluta aluaaateCmaedWINarteMypMyof Caada arimas OlanaCo� 15, 84 Sookl atmsHeObtryot � s a oLi nLr fpaf 363 G. O The foaowkp aaimaorooftheOrdersWaonl6wr.(Sol faMaryaaWdom cordd alhdla R WOrdw.suchumelntemnaeormnfla6m,whichMt000nwwa foraImparpadodJ - � Sabin M. Lord; Jr., fleput Regional Enviromnental Enginelr, et�eaM 41 f • IyyllNtlMry�r ' �yC C1~ WhenlemmdbvN maanfbnmdebnthhCaNnutemud be nipmdbyamepdyofisMwAbmt On 7 gym February 1087 Maws ma pwwn s1r15rp""ad Sabin M. Lard, Jr., Deo.Reg.Env. Engr. birlsk nbbatha _ parson daearmed h end who o><aa1Md 1ha taapoinp W hmtnntlt end aGalawladpad tl W aYaM araated gleeemau Nallrorfmmtend deal Io hyaameltNwrcCpYei f aMxL P ConNaPPA Paha b W. • ------------- *° ,Neap Hwwiy PluwbtlMhtle aP nq CwaulryNCetlaewvtlbMP�ItlNN FNM,00N -.MmrwzMeNeueglmyN .nelme.PPaae.waunam.Nm.m.rnewP.bP re awaweona ewMeunPlwnarreMtlltlrPMaw.aPucnPb IlrapbW W bN.artlmmPlmnbrrwl�W kmPnabbemNP b - wauntla �00ran 84 BOK 11671 1n,X586 V Fom0 (lose atv.s.abrostxt bena7tetrw9ean 1]plre w Sellers ,. 01MADUelwastle Original mei Gregg warren PARTIAL Certlfiaa OOMOlnplience Massachusetts WoUands proteotlon ACt.G.L.c.131,¢40 From Department of Rnvireneamtal protactim Peterson Consulting reWcUnbore Properties cls 2507 Pest Asad CLIPort, Connecticut 06490 Wesel Wmmai Daxofwteree n..._w.. 16. 7902 TWICeM=tebisslretorwkro0 Wdbyan ONero7CWWftnbaaedto Gregg Warren J The . Fn6nv1 Luta Bpd tlet. {. 196{ ryg�by� DenWment 1. D It 10h6e0yl WMW ft!the wakroplmtbA'on 849ratetwence00rder W Conditions hes ' leen sailolactorly oempbted. 2. ® nbherebyWOW 1W 0*the tdowkp PWOMOf Ns workr9"ted by theeborerafer• anesd Ord"of Conditions hate been satlsheloridwmpleted.Of the C&Wkate of Compienee does not atdlea go enareprowl,spaeywhu porno are incki d.) Pro ataes commonly known as Highlander Plaza Shopping Center described in Deed from Fafard Real Estate and Developmmt Corporation to Wolfaboao Properties Inc, dated August 25. 1992, recorded with the Etee:,South District Registry of Deeds in Book 11470, page 292 and in certificate of Title No. 62537 filed with the Sema South Registry District of the Lan Court in Registration Book 290. This CerN3mto super edea the Set= Comervatlm Commission notice currently an Me. 9. O 0 Is terebyeertled Oat ra wok rept400 byOte wotewWwanaed Ordrol 00010010re was OWN Commenced The Ordr d CaaW ftvM MXWWd b Otrslore nelonder cored.No twee wkeutlec to ropWNbntarda i•e Act meerNcrlaenead wOhaAItinpaeswNoOee of Intent and MOWN&new order of Oadmona ............__._.._......_............__.................... _.._._.__'_._.___..._.... Itoeesaaesn4 Mar6�w.t RskroN.,trajaeatd V6 B6014lt &ttf a pdfA ';Y3 u ert�:�e REFE.wPNGE RFti�-..'? I Rat•Ir.i y r y 'r/vwf 1• t �_ A�•r �tt t r _,.. —. . .. . _--.....;.:......,.a... ... . .. ......y. -8K11671 PG 587 OoitObar IS t 14LVA1 ' <• Ot tMsaenabets.twee�aoe.deehataRbsayaDeea.orlMla�wCounlameeisUietM tMdshthslmtdblsrabd.Tm ONw wssalpltwBy t'eeorded bn;'"�'�' " "'psi ldelel etft tpbbyot__Dwds teeoxCounty Reknit yw O13 . Instrument fm 026 7Mfdm"Mame o11MOfftOMeonRew:aetrouloonyoonaoateOontaeeomuro ' .Pawl Order.wmhnrrabtlw.Mm"w madtab n,~W@ to cons=brebnperper'od.1 bomby saw M• Jr Realml ftxb~ for Reeo m Proteenon 8`bneh:mis) undo Im"W WO Caiewredbn Canmbbn Oft Ow Wkds must be stpned by a mqOb of b membem 16th ' b'�— Jr.Deemb1992 befaeme eeeewsd 6a t!. . RERP totlwlwOwntobethe .• Pemendesa®edlnaid whbexacmdgta1, ina19vm tsneMww d,., bdgedbieSWaftaeeanad the AM*as Msmer tme sus and&wo. _ 1"'�mnfto l cfflMlf/Id� 11(1Mc+h�r,�t49b ' Nob' ge Myoalenbebnstootn» Oad m dMW Y the*PUN r e ' To dicot Ne:ply tkseriwlrewaMOMawaCene6neetaMpgratl feAamas Oim�eesAdwe»RraNrd"� .nrtrsewnnaeana■asnam.aa..egdwbe,yw,�� .ro ertiveeer:q s.nmurtlnern.temtewwr.wrrrwmnr aootl..awe.w►seernaa�ueeerawnrm:aweraarefee� , swab" noorms 8.2 09D I04s2eU040 0. fY Ttra Cerefrale e1W as reearded in the Repialry of Deeds or e19 landCout for the fthict In whi0ftlastandis1e�ted Thepraerwasonginally recorded on Oct. 1J. ""d Idafel a1tMRagitby�--ocods, Ennex County 600k .18 Papa 003 S. Ox The todavaV cwditiorm of tae Order shell contimre:(Set fOM any cm"Ons OOntdned in the Final Order.etrah<m rnehWencea noNWM.whiChWe toaanlnue lar a WW aerbd.) see attached sheet I cabin H. turd, Jr., "tonal Cnvironmontal Engineer for ResourceProtaction 1881190 p1r Sfoelxhvelsl � � ` t i J I When""try the Camery uncornndabn oft Cerebrate nlmt 00 ft"bya nwainv of lsnamEars. On eda 26th �v Jwe 18 ,aeloro we 80E37f Reg. ngr or s. ro. personally aPfgfereQ -to ne krtOrrn t0 M the lxeraan desodbe0 nand who exeMBd the lorepogp lnseueent"SCWCwledesd no Wane exemnad' Ole earlYldealar bee ap ena0ead. .� fl0tary r My Camnbsbneyokes r tlebrh M Mb OMexO fJlMal b qb T rbllrle aexmb Wrm OgeOaeee eater CerdbbatY,CWa1rw er p,ryrCla FWW~ hnbW nee. wer Rreebra ed"alk WOWdlnbr arina eb Ot"aecbe pow Im .1e q,xq,eMleb.ar Ng1r11NI M101aidlrrrngl,rxgr�eq,rtrilerl e O npu4rq an0.eM exV lMnl nnab airn arnteeq qO nari4pl b a0eerbq . 8.2 OR0 ( 0492, 039 ,s Partial Certificate of Compliance j File 964 - 92 , Salem i r , ) , 62) That certain parcel of land located in Salem, Essex (. County, Massachusetts, located at the intersection of First Street and Traders way and containing an area of 13.2915l�- acres of land, all as shown on a plan of land entitled: "Plan of Land in Salem, HA., Property of Highland Realty r Trust", Scale 1"-501, dated July 7, 1989 and revised November ? 21, 1989, by North Shore Survey Corp. of Salem. NA." and preps ed for The Fafard Company, 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, f HA. 01721. The plan is recorded with the Esser South Registry ? of Deeds as Plan 21 in Plan Book 261 recorded on April 2, ` j 1990. - j f � ( AST Condition 48 of the Final Order of Conditions issued by { the Department on October 4, 1984, states : "The Fafard , Companies, Inc. shall be responsible for ensuring that maintenance of all drainage inlets and outlets become a condition of all leasing or ownership of those properties for sale or lease within Highland Acres which will have drainage easements on them and will forward copies of all such maintenance agreements to the Salem Conservation Commission and the DEP'. In accordance With this condition the owner or lessor of the land at 50 Traders Way, said land being described in 02 above, any successor in control or successor in interest of that property, or his (their) agents, permittees and assigns, shall be responsible for the maintenance of: 1) the "detention basin" located on the _ southern portion of the site, north of the intersection of First Street and Whalers Lane ,2) the 30 " reinforced concrete pipe inlet to the detention basin (invert 115.95), 3) the riser pipe (elevation 107.9) prior to the 30" RCP outlet to the detention basin, and 4) the outlet to the basin itself: as well as all components of the stormwater drainage system located on said property. 1111010492to038 r \v 310 CMR 10.99 t � OEP/r uw I (44 _ 92 i � • or MPI ? r � Gerrrrann'effth p„1aw - . �Ma7iaLylkAe� � Fafard Compeniea r 1 t o ...PARTIAL... ' Certificate of Compliance Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,G.L c.131,a40+ i . Fro. Department of Lavirmiaental Protection t66tf"ArWMffy f rd Companies _ t } TO oManies 290 rl te[ c se[ ac t....r • �.++1 t { Meme) ptdaeas) :. i June 26,1990 } i Date of raavanu Tis CaMn»btw,ed Reworkrardated by an Order of CsvAbors bsued to v.•-_• --__.,,_ . ! des0 October L 19aR.....w by01e DEP I t. ❑ nshoebyWdReaa,utnewkroOuWadbyV4 0ers4f1Mftced Omer Of Conaftrd hat q r bNeaN StMc0D y catrtab19d. 2. xMt RbM" " Iffie aafoMraatotbwowtwrkcnsotmaraafe"tedbymea`c"-Mter• anted Oros of Cond'bors tore been anfsfactoray CarrmfataG MOs CaNfttatemComotianro '4•Tl Ooesfrot erOude tlleentee Dfoki apeeMy wfsl pofdonsoe irtWNet-) am attached sheet 3. = hsherebyeeffasd MMV*wwkre"tedbydteabwm-W rarteed Ordarol CW Miomwas 1 nmw toearsnced.Trw*wr of Corrdbsrs has sasea arta s me+Ware no mnper maL Ho tuaya Q 11 rrykaabjVM IDMVJ M w0ar ate AM may be Cprnanced wM and fing a nerr Robot of Want O ane acei-0 a Mr Domer of Condsons. W i .............._.«..___._....__...___..._.. ........._........__..._._._....._.................»......._......�__._....__ C �t auwttras,aonkl 1 • I Effeaira 1In0169 7 Form 8 _ - �t�_;ED i DEOEFile No. 64-92 ( h"�,M' (To be provided by DEOE) Common ealtWiAR 9 t987 City/Town SALEM of Massac usetts Applicant Gregg Marren SALEM PLANNING DEPT. ' lug PARTIAL Certificate of Compliance Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 From DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING lssuingAuthority FAFARD COMPANIES To Attn: Ronald Killian 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 01721 (Name) (Address)- Date of issuance February 24, 1987 '. Gregg, Glarrerl':' This Certificate is issued for work regulated by an Order of Conditions'Issued to dated Oct. 4, 1984 and issued by the eDartment, - 1. ❑ It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has been satisfactorily completed. 2. ® It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above-refer- enced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed: (If the Certificate of Compliance does not include the entire project,specify what portions are included.) Parcels I and II 3. ❑ It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions was never commenced.The Order of Conditions has lapsed and is therefore no longer valid.No future - work subject to regulation under the Act may be commenced without filing a new Notice of Intent and receiving a new Order of Conditions. ............................................................................................._..-................__..._..__.......-...............................--...,......_.. (Leave Space Blank) 8.1 al 4. 0 This certificate shall be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is lwte� The Ordereas Originally recorded /� October 15 , 1984 (date) at the Registry of ee s, ssex ount. Book / Page 383 5. ❑ The following conditions of the Order shall continue: (Set forth any conditions contained in the s Final Order,such as maintenance or monitoring,which are to continue for a longer period.) i Issued by Sabin M. Lord, Jr. ,, DeputA Regional Environmental Engineer, Signature(s) When issued b th Conservation Commision this Certificate must be signed by a majority of is members. Onthis�� day of February is 87 ,before me personally appeared Sabin M. Lord, Jr. , DeD. Reg.Env. Engr. tome known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Nota ublic �-- My commission expires Detach on dotted line and submit to the io Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Certificate of Compliance for the project at File Number -:-Chas been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of ti Us of the affected property on If recorded land,the instrument number which identifies this transaction is It registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction is Signature Applicant 8-2 F FAFARD REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT CORP. 29O ELIOT STREET ASHLAND, MASSACHUSETTS 01721 y3N�2,.':...:iH:(FI) TEL. (508) 881-1600 FAX (508) 875-8610 Residential Sales (508)881-6662 Commercial Sales/Leasing (508)881-1512 RECEIVED AUG 191993 Salem rMmng DO,pt August 18 , 1993 Sabin M . Lord Jr . DEP Northeast Region 10 Commerce Way Woburn , MA 01801 RE : OCC 64-92 Salem , MA Dear Mr . Lord : We would like to request a three year extension for Superseding Order of Conditions 64-92 which presently expires on October 4 , 1993 . Enclosed please find a copy of the existing document for your convenience . Thank you for your assistance on this matter . Should you have questions or require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact this office . Very truly yours , Planning & Land Use Coordinator CERTIFIED MAIL P 007 793 618 CC : Salem Conservation Commission City Hall Salem , MA 01970 file : 64-92 ' r ,. LE_ a WETLANDS FIRST - I BUILDING . PHASE w ! STYLES IL IT I dV cc r W ELL 27 1 0 0 EXISTING TREE LINE �" � . . , w .IJv _. aA` � .� 0 . VV Q LONG 13 16 3 4 `'s1.'4 r ELL .. � PROPERTY. LINE . _, '. „2. DECK 1 5 : I ' 1 � PHASE LINE r. uum TRAILS : 62 i r Lo. > T t STREET • 397f RAIL MARKER CAFE 2 I " ' I _ 1 . . � � �, � YF MAILBOX UNITS 8 PLEX 3 5 2 o DIRECTORY ENTRANCE SIGNS (2) REGENCY '- 3 II.. 19 - G .. • BUILDING LOT SIGNS 4 #33/9 BLpG 43 '29 ', 2 2 -�pRD v F TOTAL I 7 *4-. : FIRE HYDRAN NG J ' w UNIT .r rOLVUctiLINry m . * l . ,-v l R 172 128 104 116 crvr y TOTAL FIRE ALARM BOXES ( II) � F f R , ROAD ` X NAME SIGNS ANN d BUILDING COLOR;.. KEY _♦ r Y _ ` I - kAt BRICK CHIMNEY % AG ASPEN GREEN- ' T-III CHIMNEY N 1 B 1 Q2 �0 I I R i3 P ! DR � DRIFTWOOD GREY NGAL ? p s - W OPE ' E r N y �s qM1' AG s � � DS DESERT,:SAND , ci T , 5 zf •O ' O } SPACE ss ,�. 8 R D DU DUNE GREY 0 6 . ` s� ,- OPEN �o ; � L11zL3 SPACE 'O z RC RED CEDAR o l y ,�� 9 0 � � 1 1 , V yHASE O ��rnrnnrn„nIIn.. S 1 5t3 SPRUCE BLUE W z' / p phr• v ' 19 Y' R cs WETLANdB #2W NATURAL REDWOOD •�..1. .` -� rf1I11lrr / G V \� _ - } S3k P _ lt. . � • WETLANDS 63 Iso. [�`_�� .:.•''' .. p`U 6. THE SANCTUARY '. HIGHLAND PARK a _ PHA .... -. s' •; ,• ;,'. 37,! :. . SE 33 _. . • PHASE 'I PHASE MI .;. `.. "„ 33 !j ) an.2�'� ,: .N+ .= ""`i`#::,' .. � .,.^.,d1s". • , 'A - kc, - OPEN SPACE -_ ..,� . ,.-, ;. _ � 14 I to / - •: 2 ; `-- "`+?.F-►'�"s..�'r!:^. � _ - 1r ., P ! ( -tit D5 • � � � � a I'�' � LO a �a x 'i . FLYI CLANE wErLAND fi 8 17 w. IN V � T ,' 1 `" Lt1 , •ll I 82 3 S ): GRA HK W Y R NOTESI 41 - 1 1. LOCAT16N OF FIRE ALARM BOXES SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BY Q CITY ELECTRJCIAN. J w ` , B W 2 ALL UNITS ARE LESS THAN 500r SALEM J s m: BERNIA LAN U- IHI ,w w FROM :FIRE HYDRANTS rarrr LINE PHASE 3 " S ARE BASED ON v �7e O ��, 5 t� p i t - CURRENT. MARKETING PROJECTIONS 0 AND CAN BE REVISED WITH PLANNING O 4 owerLANDs � .., II BOARD APPROVAL ` < r'10 '; l .l Io K t SALEM PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FILED w JA BUSINESS N - FINAL PLAN FILED --- S - .-�1 ? 5 fl ro HEARING DATE O 1 LI 134 ;r Q r'. U PLAN APPROVED ' ' P&N 2 PLAN ENDORSED Sll ►ITNING pNE cc6 �la ''•, • � 4 ' REVISED _ PARK J g y .,r, 5 4 10 Ar v lE 00 2 REO ;; 3 HIGHLAND PARK .2 s .� . m OPEN r C 9I I SPACE , ° " ° `x . , �� ♦ DEVELOPMENT PLAN q �9 R.1 R to c '�Y LTI FAMILY ( R -3) KEENS LEL C�EfERE C®Uig RY I I ASE h w AREA `• TOTAL 69:72 ACRES T l c, 1 A p � uu � ZONES MU M s 0 BUILDINGS :EACH BUILDING IS A FOUR-PLEX , EXCEPT FOR TEN 8 -PLEX �` v v oR THE HAMLET2 R �Q 2� BUILDINGS IN �� ? n G 29 UNITS.: TOTAL=110 IO x 4UNITS BLDG 440 CHASE SALEMY : A■ lygy � : 10 x8UNITS BLDG =80 TRAIL MARMER i 9 ' TOTAL' 120 BLDGS 520 UNITS PUMP ra 3 q DENSITY: (520) - (69.72 ) =7.46 UNIT'S/ACRES STATI ° , � r \ Q- -o - e ROAD:.WHALERS LANE: 4490t FEET THE FAFARD ;COMPANIES. ;.. ,. OPEN 9� to SPACE 9 2° 290 ELIOT STREET ' APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION ASHLAND MA. `: ,.,,-t-.,... _ ,,,/•,�'. r �>. Q ' �'9REV..PHSJp � REV.DATE , ! WETLANDS k ( { a • t E SCALE. 1 100 , DATE. 30 ,OCT. 87 41 .: SHEET 10 OF FA-- 1047 -7.00 =5 10 �-, 1L� �� of vr�ri�orrnzerrta/aaa/i� c0�yuae,�,`uz9 Daniel S. Greenbaum �� ✓ o>so> RECEIVED Commissioner MAR 0? 1990 617-935-2160 March- 2 , 1990. ,Mr. Ronald S . Killian RE: SALEM/WETLANDS SALEM PLANNING DEPT, The Fafard Companies DEQE File €64-92 290 Eliot Street Request for Ashland, MA. 01721 Certificate of Compliance Dear Mr. Killian: The Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office_ c`_ --he Department of Environmental Lnc' nee-ing -as cDmnieted 4tS reView _ the let�er reauesting a`carti al _ortificate of Compliance for the proposed Somerville Lurber building at 50 Traders way in Sales , N.A. The Department has also conducted a site visit and completed its review plans received on December 12 , 1988 and entitled: 1) . "Site Plan of Land Highlander Plaza in Salem, Orading and Drainage Plan." -dated June 9 , 1989 and revised through November 10, 1989 , consisting of four (S) sheets. Prepared for: The Fafard Company, 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, N.A. 01721 .,tanned and signed b\" games E. McLouch-, ir,, P. _. _.___ z .._resP-C-de=_ Was rece_ved In ac,..,. the Depar'�:ment --nOctober _92 wh c.. requires hat vD,U rrcvide as-b41la.^.s when -ecue=— n Cert-`Conn-- -ancc . _:,e_e is \' C7. _ -e.^_IC %eCLia _':ic 1an and __ indicate, however, that the eventual discharge Dolnt C_. detention basin is a B�7+ located downgradient and southwesterly of the site. To grant. Said Certificate d' _%__ time would be inconsistent oath 31C ^MR Regulations, which authorizes the Denartmen,: to reou_ate Page -2- File # 64-92 - Request for Partial Certificate determined that such activities alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. The activity as proposed, and as approved under the Final Order, the full buildout of the lot with construction of an 89 , 000 square foot building and detention basin to hold the resultant increase in peak runoff, with an outlet having a direct (piped) connection to a BW7, will alter said Area. The Department therefore will not grant a Certificate of Compliance for the project, prior to its actual construction, at this time. If you or any concerned party should have any questions please contact Mr. Philip DiPietro at (617) 935-2160 . vr� y trulyo rs, Satin M. Lord, Jr. , Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer SML/pd/pdp cc: Salem Conservation Commission THE FAFARD COMPANIES LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 290 Eliot Street Ashland, MA 01721 DATE�3O �p� JOB. NO. (617)881-1600 ATT EN to C a / RE: a To �►�l ��annih� ��-r��t.,j� o eh eQ,/as.R Get-Gs�. sw/,eH„ �ia�oHLCLIVLU Li i GENTLEMEN: yyy�, yr�T WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via —� E)Vl �r"''t�ie'TO& n-g mems: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications s ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order -12, QTY 11 t� t (:&/c S COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution _ ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 18 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO • SIGNED:L� � a ANTHONY D. CORTESE, Sc. D. one 'W J 610d& Ova? Commissioner OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, 9TH FLOOR, TELEPHONE 292-5568 June 13 , 1984 John R. Serafini, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE : DEQE Wetlands File No. 64-92 DEQE Hearing Docket No. 84-27 Salem (Fafard Companies ) REPORT OF PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE A pre-hearing conference concerning the above-referenced wetlands case was held at the Department ' s Boston office on June 12 , 1984 . The parties to this proceeding at this time are as follows : The Fafard Companies (the applicant ) , represented by John R. Serafini , Esq. ; the Salem Conservation Commission, represented at the conference by Mr. Charles Frederiksen ; and the Department staff, Mr . Phil DiPietro, represented by Barry P. Fogel , Esq. Purity Supreme Supermarkets while not a party , was represented by Warren Hutchison, Esq . This case involves a notice of intent , filed pursuant to the Wetlands Protection Act , G. L. c . 131, §40 (the "Act" ) , which originally included a plan to develop a 138 acre undeveloped site with 45 ,000 square feet of commercial space , 305 ,000 square feet of industrial space , 750 condominium units , and an additional 9 holes for the Highland Park municipal golf course . Based upon preliminary plans of the development , the Salem Conservation Com- mission issued an Order of Conditions , dated January 12 , 1984 , approving the project subject to 29 conditions. A request for a superseding order was submitted to the Department by Purity Supreme Supermarkets on January 26 , 1984 . After an on-site inspection held February 21, 1984 , the Department issuea a Super- seding Order, dated April 27 , 1984 , denying the project . A Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing was filed by the applicant on May 10 , 1984 . r -2- In the Notice of Claim, the applicant has stated two primary issues which were discussed at the conference. First , the applicant challenges the exercise of jurisdiction by the Department which was initiated after the request for action was filed by Purity Supreme . This challenge is based upon their contentions that ( 1) Purity Supreme is not an owner of land abutting the project , and (2 ) the failure of Purity Supreme to send copies of their request to the applicant by certified mail or by hand-delivery constitutes a procedural defect ren- dering the request and the Department ' s actions void . The second primary issue raised by the applicant is that the Deparment should not have reviewed the project under the new regulations effective April 1 , 1983 , and instead that the old regulations should be appli.ed. After a discussion of these issues , the following points of agreement were reached : ( 1 ) After extensive discussion of these issues , it was acknowledged by all participants that the issue of the Department ' s jurisdiction, as based upon Purity Supreme ' s standing to request Departmental action , would merit legal analysis by all participants . However , it was agreed that if Purity Supreme chooses to remain involved in this case only as a participant , and does not request status as a party , then the applicant would withdraw their motion to have Purity Supreme ' s request and the Department ' s actions declared void. Purity Supreme will notify all parties of their decision and the applicant will respond accordingly . (2 ) It was further agreed that if the first issue is resolved as described above , the remaining procedure is to have the applicant submit detailed plans for their project concerning the location of the wetlands and other resource areas , and proposed activities affecting and protecting them. The Deparment will review the proposal under the old wetlands regulations . On this issue , it was acknowledged that the applicant had sent their Notice of Intent to the Salem Conservation Commis- sion by- certified mail and that it had been received prior to April 1, 1983 • Based upon the conference , the following schedule was agreed upon : ( 1) Purity Supreme Supermarkets will submit a motion to intervene requesting status either as a party or as a participant. (2 ) If Purity Supreme requests status as a participant the applicant will submit a written withdrawal of their challenge , which is implied in The Notice of Claim for Adjudicatory Hearing, to the Department ' s jurisdiction to issue the Superseding Order. -3- ( 3 ) The applicant will submit plans to the Department and will allow participation by the Salem Conservation Commission and Purity Supreme ' s technical consultant in the technical review of the plans . (4 ) The Department will review the plans under the old regulations . With the consent of all parties (DEQE, applicant , Salem Conservation Commission ) DEQE staff will recommend a Final Order for the Commissioner ' s review and consideration as settlement of the applicant ' s appeal of the Department ' s earlier denial . ( 5 ) If Purity Supreme files a motion to intervene as a party , the other parties may file written objec- tions within seven (7 ) days of that motion as provided in 310 CMR 1. 01(7 ) (a) ( 1) . In addition, a schedule will thereafter be developed for filing legal briefs and factual testimony ( if necessary ) prior to a hearing. Any additions or corrections to this Report must be filed with the Department within one ( 1) week of the date of this report . Very truly yes , Barry PI. Fogel Deputy General ounsel BPF/kas cc : Salem Conservation Commission Warren Hutchison, Esq . - Phil DiPietro, DEQE Northeast Region Summary of-tho-DEOE Adiudicatr,ry. Bearinn 'or the Fafard Companies Project in Salem, Ti-',, JLLDe 12, 1934, Present at the meeting were: Deputy General Council --or DEQE; Phil Dipietro, Field EaJnear for DEQE; Howard Fafard, Greg Warrea, _-^d 1;j.-,L'. fro, be Fafard Companies; John Serafini, attorney for The Fafard Cnmpanlcs ; P.r. Futchitson, attorney for Purity Supreme; and Charles Frederiksen, Conservation Commission Aide. Howard Fafard gave a brief summary of the Fafarl projw=L io S,Icm. He showed a recently revised wetlands map done by TrMIM Ln�--`noLciag , - ) i es �ss( c X- HMM feels that Salem's Wetlands Maps for the area in n-uestion are inaccurate and made reference to the changes. Mr. Fafard noted twat the first Scmeiit of the project to be developed will be the commercial area. Sucand will be the Boston Traders site. There was discussion regarding the location of vD;landn in the area above First Street. Fafard took the position that there ara ::one, I ' D20E noted that there are intermittant streams and drainage swales that pro there and are not shown on the plans. John Serafini next addressed what the germane issue of the hearing is; was this a timely filing? He showed a receipt of the >-,oncc of intent filed in March of 1983. He also noted that Fafard had been 7eeting With the City and ConCom for a year prior to that time. The Deputy General stated that the affective data of the application is when it is filed with the local ConCoT so he agreed t'�,at the. r,roJact comes under the old regulations. He did note, however, tha7 Fafard wLmoly "beat the clock" with this filing because no real plans were sulh;iiitr,xi and in his opinion have not yet been submitted. The plans do not show whnL vould be done or how wetlands would be altered. In his opinion, when each phase or building is filed for in the future, and plans are presented to al.tur wetlands, that each would require a new filing. He noted that 0o numbers are there for a "maximum case," however there are no specific plans showing what will be done. Each amendment of the conditions could he and would be nppealed by DEQE. The Deputy General also noted that the project fills 3 wetlands without replacing them. He also asked the following: 1. How many across of wetlands will be affected? 2. Where are the wetlands now? 3. ',rir: ,iren' t streams and drainage swales shown? 4. QU will be removed? Howard Faafard stated he is willing to piston to D _ E as he"that - has in ,'I the oast. And he added that procedure would you like us zo Fol_lon? The Daputy General recommanded the following pr'oceinre : 1. DEQEwill. have jurisdiction over the yroject and will. write a naw Ord_r of Conditions . Snl..e.., ConCom no longer has jurisdiction. 2. Fafard will submit now plans in the ne ::_ t7o weeks to DF.QE. 3. Purity Supreme will he a "participant" and not ,_ legal party (in essaac.e they are -..r,i:e;--,:r_ the! ,-- right h,ei;_right to appeal the Order of Conditions) . 4. Salem ConCom will he z "legal party in this proiect . They will be notified of any meetings betwoRn ... and Fa and and will nava input into the Fo.. 7ula tion of the new Order of: Conditions. 5. The regulation prior to April 1 , 1983 :ill apply. The Deputy General asked each pnr.ty how they felt about this proposal. All members except Chacles Fredoriksen agrood . Mr. Frederiksen stated that the i-nterest of Salem's ConCom is that they have local control over the project . The Deputy General stated that as a legal party they will be 0 olved and have the right to appeal any order or amendment. The meeting was adjourned. 0.,��OS CUl�rl Conservation Commission r. Salem. Massachusetts 01970 July 5, 1982 Memorandum: TO: Gerard Kavanaugh FROM: Charles Frederiksen RE: Fafard--DEQE Meeting on June 29, 1984 PARTIES PRESENT: Charles Frederiksen; Phil Depietro, DEQE Field Engineer; Greg Warren and Bill McDonough, Fafard Companies; and Dave Webster, HMM Associates representing Fafard. As requested by DEQE in the last meeting, Fafard has surveyed their entire site and has updated their plans to show what existing wetlands are there. Dave Webster from HMM presented the plan to Phil Depietro. The resource areas that this project will effect include Bordering Vegetated Wetlands, Land Under Water, and Intermittant Streams. It is possible that the site can absorb all runoff from the project without causing any runoff to abutting parcels. MMM is researching this possibility and will report to DEQE with their results. The residential plan as it exists now will fill some wetlands. This is not acceptable to DEQE. Fafard will rearrange their site plan so that there are minimal alterations to wetlands. Any alterated wetlands will be compensated for. Any roadways thatcrosswetlands must be elevated and cannot be built by filling. Streams must be hydralically connected if roadways cross them. Fafard at the next meeting must address the off—site impacts of their project in terms of how it will effect Thompson's Meadow and the 100 year flood plain. Fafard would like to divert runoff away from Swampscott Road as planned, but they must provide a more detailed plan to DEQE showing how they intend to do it. One issue that came up was whether the compensation of wetlands could be done using Conservation Commission land adjacent to the site. There is an area below First Street, owned by ConCom that presently is used as a dump site. Fafard would like to clean it up for the Commission and use part of it as wetlands compensation. I told them I would bring it up at the next ConCom meeting. Greg Warren will be finalizing his residential plan in the next few weeks. I told him to set up a meeting with you and I before going before the Planning Board. Cri r rhf•V1 TP PF 'AScrr11W�FTT.z PFPAPTi UT rF EI'%(IFON FI'TPI rrtLITY FI'rIr•FFPIPr PFFIrr rF rEp'FF'M Cr14°SFI Cnc "inter Street `."trn, ratsachusPtfg r^irs• Trlephcne (F17) ?e,?_FF�rr NVrE Eel's' kf rrrTEr'T r!F rrTIC.F PF QPIr rfT, Ar,111PICATePv I'.FFPIl f 111TRI TVF- r_FT1 !'1 r'S nPPTFfTTrI ACT. Thr rrpprtr-vnt of irnvirmirwntizl rualitrl Fnn,inrr•rinn's "roles for Ad,judicatery Proceed- ings," 31r CIP 1 ,CI0, rrgnire that certain infomatien hP sulnittrc as part of a requost fnr an adjudicPtery hrarine on A SucPrseding Crrter of ronritims issPro by the eepartr.rnt under the t.etlands Protr•etior, Act, This infomation is necessary to ensure, that each rr- c•urSt for A i!nprirr? riay he, handlPrr rff-iciontly ane! that thr rinhts of all pArtie,s Are ern_ tPc.tr-c, Failure to sunhit all of the necessary data may result in nism issA1 by the rcrartnrnt of the rvqurst. for A I:tarinn. The key rlelents which Arr required are a statment of the facts rxrlainino t^! the nrrton rrguesting A Learing Blairs that the Suprrsedinn rrder should to charmed and.-T7 iat it srnuld t,e chAnnrd tn. P sirple Pnl.mnration of thr puhlic intrrrists it^ntifirrr ie, thn feet_ lands Protection Pct ruill riot he sufficient. A I'Oticv of Clair. for Njudieatory Pearino must include the follovrinq infomationc (i ) P title r•,hieh indicates the name of the case (i ,r „ rfrF "Ptlands File hrrrhrr, City/Town, of Arplicrntl - (?1 The, rnmpintc narr, addrrss and tolrrhnnn rtw.her of v,r party filinn the rcdnuPst for a hearing Ann, if rgrrrsented by counsel , the name ann address of the attorney; (') Tho narar•s and addrvssos of All ot"Wr rartirs and their rrnrrsrrtatiwes, if knrnm- (^) P clear statmPnt. that A formai ddjudicatory hrarino is heinn rnguPsted: {�) A clear and concise statement of the objections to the. SupPrsedinr; order- (F) P clear and concise statc+jent of the facts upon vrhich the mquast for a hearinq is hasef . (7) P clear ano enncise statPnnnt of th^ chaners r.ihich are snunht in the SurcrSrdinn Prdnr- And (f) P statcn-ent that a copy of the regnrst is heinn sent at the sa!u• tine to the dpCllCant th^ r_gnServAtinn r0"`ni';SiOn And PAr.r: other rarty rr rrrrrsrrtat.ieo of the party, if kncrn. P r'otico 0 Claim for P•djudicator,%• i'carina rn,st hr, f11nd 1111thir• ten hrrsinrss rays cf the dntr of issuance rf ter: Supersrrirn rreer and rnnst hn se•nt t Suzenre Cerrevelr , rndr,t Clerk office of frnerO Counsel rrrArtnPnt of rmrironr,r•ntal rualit!r rnninacrinp rnr, t'intP.r Street Poston, � A r•?►^p (� / ANTHONY o. covTaE, u.o. /2r*/w February 2, 1984 George 14. 8umuno, Jr. 83: 58lDM/R27L&NUS Vice President Real Estate File #64-92 Purity Supreme Supermarkets 312 Duotou Road North Billerica, MA 01862 Dear Mr. Uumanu: The Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is in receipt of your Appeal dated, January 26, 1984, regarding the above referenced project. This Department, under the provisions of General Luno, Chapter I]l, Section 60, brrchy schedules a field investigation with you and all concerned parties to determine if the area is significant to the interests of the Act and to discuss the crlovuoc iauoro informally wih parties to the appeal, Mr^ Ylip Diyietro from this office will hold a site iuuyrotivo on Tuesday, February 2I, l984 at 11:00 A.M. at the Highland Avenue entrance to the site. in ousc of inclement weather, the inspection will be held at Salem City Roll . No activity may commence on any portion of the project subject to the jurisdiction of Chapter l]l, Section 40, until this Department issues o Superseding Order of Conditions regulating the activity. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Mr. DiYietro at 935-2160^ Very truly yours, William A. Krol, P.E. Deputy Regional Environmental Ougioccr W&K/PDP/mea cc; Mr, Gerard McNeil, The Bufard Companies, 290 Eliot St. , Ashland, p& Jubo R. Sezufioe, Attorney-at-Law, Federal Street, Salem, M& 01970 Conservation Commission, Iu*o Hall, Salem, M& 01970 - Attn: Dale E. Yale, Clerk. � �k P 445 292 049 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED N OF FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to —ro-) ,h Street it N f-21110iz" CZ)- 2 d PO- SIXd�11`Cold A y Postage CeOfied Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Recetpt showing to whom and Date Del,vered Return Receipt showing to whom Dale. and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees CS Q Postmark or Date W 0 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see front) I. If you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article,date, detach and retain the receipt,and mail the article. 3, If you want a return receipt, write the ceffified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card,Form 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space per- mits.Otherwise,affix to back of arricle. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee,or to an authorized agent of the addressee,endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. 11 return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. ,uN C��b i 1. Conservatim Commission Salem. Massachusetts 01970 'tfAs"f�� June 13 , 1991 Mr . David N. Stern, Esq. Rochw, Carens , & DeGiacomo 605 Broadway Saugus , MA 01906 RE: 56 Aurora Lane, Salem Order of Conditions Recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 7323 , Page 228 Dear Mr . Stern : Please be advised that the Salem Conservation Commission knows of no non-compliance with the Order issued by the Department of Environmental Protection, in regards to 56 Aurora Lane . The Salem Conservation Commission ' s Order which is recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 7323 , Page 228 was superseded by an Order from the Department of Environmental Protection . The Commission ' s Order, therefore is no longer valid. The Commission has record that the Department of Environmental Protection issued an Extention Permit on September 24 , 1990, which extended their Order through October 4 , 1993 . Since the Department of Environmental Protection issued the Superseding Order of Conditions, the Certificate of Compliance must also be issued by them. We have no record of the Department of Environmental Protection being in any way dissatisfied with compliance to their Order of Conditions . The Commission hopes that this letter explains why no Certificate of Compliance from the Conservation Commission exists, and why the Commission will not be issuing the Certificate of Compliance . We see no problem, whatsoever with the sale of the condominium unit referenced above . er ly, V hn G . Vallis, airman CM607 Mr. and Mrs. Gene Rosch 166 Whalers Lane Salem,MA 01970 July 17, 1989 Administrator R E C E I V E L) Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green JUL 1 �- lggg Salem, Massachusetts 01970 A g q gg rr. ggpp J�Al�fi� �6hetl®nae��t �L9"�. Dear Sir: This is with regard to the proposed development and construction of the Somerville Lumber Company Retail/Storage Facility at Traders Way and First Street, Salem. We OPPOSE the development and construction of the Somerville Lumber Company proposed Retail/Storage Facility at Trader's Way and First Street, Salem based on the traffic and environmental problems it will generate. We cite the use regulations of the City of Salem Zoning Bylaws,Business Parks Development Districts Section, Subsection 3, which states,in pertinent part: . . . provided that such operations: 3) "Are not offensive, detrimental, injurious,noxious, or hazardous by reason of causing dust, smoke, odor, fumes,radiation, ground water discharge, noise, vibration, traffic congestion, or other nuisance." We feel the development and construction of this facility at its proposed site will cause unnecessary harm to the local environment and severely decrease the quality of life for people who live in this area. Please support us in this effort. Thank you. Sincerely, Ae, Rc4ex Gene Rosch Lisa E. Rosch July 20, 1989 Mayor Anthony V. Salvo Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Mr. Salvo, As a property owner in Salem, a member of the Hamlet Condominium Association, and a registered voter, I am writing to express my concern about the land development project being undertaken by Fafard Construction. The parcel of land involved is located between First Street, Traders Way, Highland Avenue and Swampscott Road. This area is already heavily congested with trafic. Additional construction and the establishment of more businesses would make this problem intolerable for area residents. Other concerns associated with an increased volume of traffic include the amount of noise pollution abutters would be subjected to and the creation of unsafe play areas and streets for children residing here. I find it inconceivable that the city officials of Salem would allow Fafard Construction to begin another massive project when it has failed to complete construction of the Hamlet. It is clearly evident that roads are not paved, construction equipment remains on the site, landscaping has not been completed, and freshly painted buildings are badly peeling. I will work diligently with area residents to insure that this project is curtailed. Please carefully consider the impact of this and other construction projects on area residents and the environment in general . Your time and consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Joy M. Higgins cc. Mr. William Luster Administrator, Salem Conservation Commission Ms. Abby Burns Mr. Walter Power Ms. Linda Vaughan Mr. Richard Williams Mr. Chuck Puleo Mr. Kosta Prentakis Mr. Michael J. Cunningham, Esq. IRVING R. KUSIN=1. 63 AURORA LANE Cr SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 July 20 , 1989 City of Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Planning Board Member : You will be considering the application made by Fafard Construction and Somerville Lumber to construct a facility adjacent to the Sanctuary Condominium at the corner of Trader ' s Way and First Street . I am a resident and trustee of the Sanctuary Condominium and am greatly concerned about the impact that this proposed facility would have on our safety and quality of life . This large facility would operate seven days a week and would attract constant motor traffic consisting of both cars and trucks , on First. Street and Trader 's Way , both of which are essential roadways for at least One .Thousand resi- dents of our condominium and the other closely. adjacent reseidential areas along First Street , Whaler 's Lane and the many private condominium streets . These areas" provide homes for many families with children of all ages, who would be threatened by the .inevitable heavy traffic attending an operation such as Somerville Lumber . Along with these obvious dangers comes environmental popollution such as dust , fumes , vermin , noise , vibration, etc . Please use your influence to defeat this projectwbmcb would impact so heavily on so many Salem citizens and their families . Yours very truly , Irving Kusinitz Trustee , Sanctuary Condominium CC . Mr . William Luster City Planner Administrator Salem Conservation Commission CC . Mayor Anthoy V. Salvo Salem City Hall �oN coir' 2 z Conservation Commission Salem. Massachusetts 01970 ^�assnc� TO: Conservation Commission Members FROM: Rebecca Curran RE: Continuation of Determination — Swampscott Road ------------------------------------------------------------------------ At our last meeting,(September 10, 1987) Dr. Jerome Carr from Carr Research Associates, an environmental science laboratory, was present to explain the "wetland status report" regarding the proposed construction on Swampscott Road. This determination is the definition of the type of wetland area that exists, after which a proposal for construction will be submitted by Fafard. There was some question concerning wetland #2, which is now an isolated land subject to flooding (see attached map) . This land, at one time, was a bordering vegetated wetland. The hydraulic connection was eliminated by the construction of a gravel access road. Since the meeting the applicant has submitted a topographical map of the area dated 1965 which indicates that this road existed at the time. The determination was continued until all members could view the site. A site inspection was made on Tuesday September 15. I1049 ION CQ,f Salem. Massachusetts 01970 To: Conservation Commission From: Rebecca Curran Re: Determination of Applicability — Swampscott Road Date: September 4, 1987 This proposal involves the proposed construction of a 208,000 s. f. building on Swampscott Road. The building would involve the filling of two wetland areas. The purpose of this determination is to define the type of wetlands which exist here. The owner has retained the services of Carr Research Laboratories and has submitted a detailed "wetland status report" dated. August 6, 1987. The Commission made a site visit and concurs with the wetland status report, as prepared by Dr. Jerome Carr, that wetland #1 is isolated land subject to flooding, and that wetland #2, is now isolated land subject to flooding, although was at one time a bordering vegetated wetland. The area's hydraulic connection was eleminated by the construction of a gravel access road. Finally, the report states that wetland #3 is a bordering vegetated wetland. (See attached map) The altering of isolated land subject to flooding is allowable under the Wetlands Protection Act, Chapter 10.57, and is significant only with regard to the compensatory flood storage capacity that will be lost as a result of a proposed project. On August 22, 1985, an Order of Conditions was issued for the Maynard Plastics building. Special condition #2 states the Commission has determined the bordering vegetated wetland to be signifcant to the protection of the Act. Therefore, no work may be permitted on the site which destroys or otherwise impairs a bordering vegetated area in excess of 5,000 square feet. 11028 Swampscott ti200 Feet Wetland 3 NORTH , �� Maynard bio d�trj' Plastics i Building 1 � � r i Wetland 2 1 li _ Gravel Road � Gletland 1 j Blasted Rock Area Figure 1. Sketch Plan of Fafard Industrial Site, Salem, Mass. -2- •�u.`` -�(Um M(1.1'eatC,�'�ae-cQ �.Ua�Y1 }+P�'. PO _- SCALE / - 800 HIGHLAND PARK �� ' -�• MUNICIPAL 1 . "-' 'X° ° :�':::••::':; a GOLF ` I�- :J� %/ 7 / '•.i COURSE f �r t RV � %�: •:=^:kms :�• - _'_ "-�----�----- -r+---•- . .....::...: ti.....�•:::: — :1G''•e2�.'��•��:�." eoarox «c n. a. f wP9r_ ACREAGE.' THOMPSONSMEADOIY- 79.02` PIPE-LINE- 2.3 `+\ LOR/NG AVENUE- 26.9 ,z w I b e:+SXw; n � I/• -` O - - P it p a �FY +a C 1 � �y1 t 6 'f;r__ •�--• �•:�:�^�:::tom "�- - o , A y; : '.i>4 r.`F ! -:_., .,• ..:.. • b {) H 1 ^:'6}�a'�4 ;�.:'"£a` S:1t,}, • ur.r'•1?a^s, ;;..n.. [2 v � r,..b\'int sr.. tom... . .2.. t-,.. .,.}_ 4F`. .3,, - .:.`v.«.. ......,. t•.k. .. yy.. .n , `1 ,.. a'A`r s: 4 ,*..r :.:, x �:frw :,. h S z. ';t, . ., ,.... ..,.. 11 q P.n .; w, : s, s � -r and ..�.ha +t .,5. fi f {.. ..r -X-.., r A-a. � E MF. ..Mo. .rr.- i'; F aF.,., f;tt.,.r - .�. .r-,., �1 i}ry. Vr,y.. r.;4r f•r.. ai. S" 11 IXI .... ..mow,- t., -,' :r. 17A,. .•r •:.., ., ., .^. i r 1. � ; �tS,; .,:. . ,.. :;~r, r s k,. ..,:- . .v :1j.,, !. ms-:,� .,. ,r,7r.: 26tt . . + , »,d - s :T» ' ,'`.� .:� .'�; esti•' • Y� ti Fa.ait, ) _# 5t:,,e1a. ,Rv Ledge'. .;y.,4 ` � .f�. . .,,a'�.',.,�.t:,:-. �',.,�,..`�. . . ,' r., . ,ip ';� ' *�y.,, ,•g ., .. t.P�'; ?7 y,., . r'"1 aA' +' �,u:i ': :r. .-5. r '� ,., I =;x 'k§r \' 5"• . 7. ,t �v# ry _ ..t:'�i ^ Y, i"'u�,:.�? } +s c"y� h •.. r'�,.,l �, �.,p„-cl,...§ C{.z; ':.k„ .'c ,.., r r,_� a,.2�:.} : :.:: 'sk. -•s r. �'t �..,, r ,.,.�i"�"" ', ir. � }. �,+ksx, `3T' .M .� .?'`.,� •4 Y. Ss ei ;ri: �,zt.'�`. +a!iw: � ,, ,.,<:; vt;" :q n��,�•;�.' n t l., x 5,. ;�. -'i. �.��.,y^,��;p'f r^3 ",r, kr - ,r•�:�"5' ;��..:f, 'n fe j ':� / =y �fgr s l k. i:. ,.w�,yF�V., 5 i"C wi'�: \k: : , ],{,.,.N'y i�. •� ay' .e.-. +.,.. 1W� "}T' ,t 5e Yr,'?'.- s n ' ,may V .{:6,2L.,.•r*a !'b.'fh- '1 c.' �, 7 e:.. x..,.. J .SY a.. ..:'n a. t:o- 17 S 5:. 4. 1:: '3 „6tY ' .:.f', }• + ;.Ir f i '..f w.v brh. i.�Y;. lr 2 r.: II �.. . , Y t , x '6 t h� Y� n 3 ^,;xp 1 nA`,"k;# ;�� -1- �"- /{'C; u7 *: .. . ay,' , p '•. �r rj.., yx sLw ,;,.x yr :^t _. ,,;. . .0.n. s.zrr$ .;+*' v a ,ti.- ........LLe a + a -( f iS.Pf M s u1 './ t. .a: sr ;• ar"ys�:''t�:n: .•E; _4' :,r} '�� '136 01. of mIh a� ao$,.� ,t c:" ,"'i "•:"S `aP tsy�ssk , k °�,:.� n t .-- �..tA t;4 .. `t ' J €,- 4'r1` 1 :.,,t e ;'.1. aA .. 7 ,i'., ... ,. ..c°•tt,',, as d..,• , , . .f- rr', r� .a:r r;'„r.":fid. <,.::�: , s y: :Lcd -e atAJ.Btt. • 26;6 al.per, •:',�s Y �.t,. .... a FF : .. a.+ Sv /F � o wrier - .9 .9 r. 9 P... In dt'i+''A J 1 t, ?C},.f�'�e�. . ?g.. .�"�'r�¢¢. -tzr:�;,•� 'k��r 4 � f _ .+t wilYi$ty ..s�''sw..',. .�fs pt 1' •JI !.s'"Tw",. r+, � [. F^„a*{.., r..i zt . Led ai-.-$.2it • r a+qe tY • r e•` 6v i :,.x �.r 7 t, .c } r * s-•,c r ,.? 7 :39gaLlperminf'a . Lea ,,}, p�' �y 1 '• .R ! u +51. ♦1' '.'. % ..f...,:. ..r::' / : .. 1 l (�: %Y'het: •: 1Y li 1".5'rY,+%'' Yf 5+..�,2 L, 1' fief xM� 1kW:X i.t, FYI -� Led Q it lr 57 , 5 PS.� Ys Y•. ^ ,� 5 „} n. ... j s S 's�5: ,. ,•(, i:. < e.;' e">i;>a� .': 'K) iT rt"^:u1rp r Sir, %b=,.. k. rj, :::�i : Z 'f:,:.^Y t• +e:s." „ r- •syr.. T'?:, i .:. . . „. :36 al. -per min:at 7{�' �j. i t d Y k k., k z,.M 3 : i, ,f S .lrS• 5 ;,.f .t.;' / q P �yypp # ,.:._.l + at '...:" J01-7 f 4cE 4 .k ,xr'V,c7.-+y. e > i a y;1r - r-e.Kr %..: Ledge.at. ZB-7.7T- Io ] {t•. .?.. rP' ; 0,..'r 2.., x k.: 't !. t.r..n:e c ,a F.:r rl. .a., ; J .. 1"•k�: 3 x :. 033; �1bM M I .y,,. ..,w - -a. :: t6 s. `{F .i 3;,' rd -die>i (F .,. ._:j: o / . .,:. 1 � •�r+r.- at..i., t , e.y LL b}R, + lr. - 8 R. "s �',i'• i,' " rr F'H,'t g-N> s4.:;r�S" .' w ''��+;••'ti; > 'x1. Ibt �t'I-F . �+3s`�'�4`,^f�('4fyit„<�y"'t_,.7�yg,'.n•�^xaG.§'�.�Vyv,�A;Y�.:,G,k,ys3. I»x,�. ."i,;yyt L r, ��t, ;{ cr, -Z" , 11V .lIy iP 1t+F 1.J•tn,,}.`iiiA ."I F. � r 1 �3 „� €na sd ,ft;'i<,n Ca.Pv/J+•� ' - Yi yF:i r` r'sc.:ri.;=d,t'L' il�ra5i.'^r1�dP _'�:":w',n 11.t.., k i{s •>fi:Yif r S .d''k.,i•'yn5- i `3 n � i +axk4'L i x a'`d T "i{ wµ'ii.=,. t `SC J a f.,¢7 r.•aFj R tieJSS :.:irk. ; ... ..,. CI + i ,. t . rY 1•:k,.T!`r RaP , .,r.-f 1 ., .r0 :G1. ' _I X10 '11.5 al. er.min:01' 4]-ft e Y'] e:r t,,{r+kri r Yt ov ... ii'Asx)„a,). ,f 7 FR �r. .'G g }� y }2CY. e',t ' t't k #'` "Y •$'r ` . 'N un to. ix' Y JLedge ` .; I„ Led e at'.61.3 4Y. p r �l_y:. y Fp +y.- ...ir=>eF�� i T .., +, .tel 2).1.1 ,::T'}":»r ,3s�•, •r!�'� t 1s ,:' f 'C4a/" : a:, 9, - � ./ 1 _xj" u9.! .�. r e,k* &t'''`..a;n�,+ 1 i tl'. N7Jf Ey t�E" e kb>•1„J:lt;,� + " , - ,t , .°`t Y +p :t5, S +'"s' r Jr e}.,. a ,.,x NP: '+'+�;. , ,� u• 4, -_y^-x .. `�' ' 7 , :;: meq, d.,J �,x. y�r) ,�� ` yTk la 1 I.P. ..N K`^L'7t 1Y,!5,r• h ~,. jy:.4,+ @�. r •,i; § 1 ;�;� f:yr r\r\¢sR �aL SKi m avavw .:'.'I,1 {^ -at.26 {1: . i t` "al +' '• 1, �+ .:t^ r :... Luiz i �'.. Ledg2,. p 1Y XC c � It 'i +.t k7 I 4L. - ' \x' i+'',k'Xf.hs..7E�,.N \ •f t i •f % �\` t + tr „11 :y tet` Ja 6 `: 1 6'tr" ) i`FST,, A= i't �.�.f l` + .+.'/ ir4.i \::. �J ,t> isitf�«iT `j'�$:ii n1 .•,�: w, �v -f t' d... 1 . _ a 1 *",. •, Y'r3' 'a; +,rap• ce 9 u,s,7nT•e�y .. t X'Zt {1 y N" t r -r x^,z:1 r y .b>• 1 Y\, .'Is .r3 Yix is „ s d a Srnn at,'ias�,rv,,' w y:' r `shi,'.4 ��s� s;t rYil�r �r f R�,? r•y :,•� V, k'O <f' v r; e•. 'E" W 5 : .r. Yf /r.:, , fd...:r st 'r•.t> rrx 3ck .v.J P, ] irv..F....yi, ,.,..K ,.. A [ Y • r t 5.`,. \. :.t.'Jy k;a.>,y.: .Dfi` (ri - ;d:; ..+..�5 a,r s._F_ , • srrt:d1, t .:r;i'.' er r .rif . ' !. a.'.a y i fo. - 1 , -•tl %�-M ,`a.r,F'a .. '{ci$�J d%, rJF , Av'.... .. 4..,::/'<12•. 5 ..? � , *Y.i ..., v.a r._ ],., .4 r> Fa. 'EfJ2 t! ,.s f'.ar,.:r. v Y - 1 ,. �i fr S r p. 22'fl' �M ) ,\ + ,r`,..�.6':. ?• .s.. ,.F[ .,, u,,<. s s,. ..-•. ry ^p -' s '� l2?119.8 dlil Et'm%n..Q�'" .-.r J,.,. ; 'i' ,p a s 911 P o k PVP it ;h.x if;9.r l$f S rmSd 9 yam.:. �. // ro I + i "' IC kf'3„ -*r�'.:�:" . + f :y:', ` , ' , r:•, yy�� r.. ; % x:i,, .V Led a afAV; � � e s r d r i 'q %x t r t 9 i Ais :Gsf rtx f1 - x y e e y ..' 4 1 },..., 54i d* J R ti~ ? 1 d ti j WP 14#;3 dl. er inxn• at`3Sit .,,.,% j a " �`t ` '`� Twk : + s ; ,;. `4�' 5� ,: �tAy" � �` i�. My�":q:ncF� M W�� J ,.f{t ✓'a ?:,rri'r. r , ;. �rLCd 1r41r•�s zl� ,.".;f `A ':�1:'�.'P>tr f - .. '.'`j" 4` R}�y`" ,+t S .,.f'.}} N S [ t Y i., 9. ..f e Y�. 7 ° :� i( r� ta' %i'. t •S ."+'fi •b'r •ru:.3r,,% .Y• ,,. ' ,�..'+r . ff.x.F a✓�-•F yr... ',•'4`:nr, u.,-„ ce-z. .r' J'k�' e r.. .t'., R '� ♦ Y^J �., �.,4,.:fr r-.../ +•":P`Y. {. in... ,,ak'f.;.. ,.. •,. x ) .-:TR ,,s.' .. _r{�r ,>.,.; s= f<,;.'.✓ hr. e c�i �. ,� N a;.:/. �., ;,. ,.F^l rz ..:. � :, ::. J .tk. ,,fl�'i�";.7 .q q .y��'.: r ,•a:e..' p f ,t f � �:�. ,L+Ys �{1y:. .r q: •:1v�5Ci ,.:i;. ,, .>!.'.., {r .:J; iia,:(u}` F.y �..-xa1".�' T :..�:�r e ..,; S. ;:r .,.: . P ,i:: ,e tel. ri s15� Gaeta-:it': !KYx :+y,.�' 3'. , /'r.If;-4. ,, f, '7,• .:Y„+ x ".r pewv.nt n4 r, t ':.r!, % l.C. A ° ig + s,era' !;T%yyn..'t,fkJr ar ,, e k ',`X. i r, 5,.r . ,:, t;:- ✓ " rrl iir /� ` b0 +r r {(-� .� �ti d 1+nit {t� x 6i. , �(nn,. 1,;{ Y t.;1 "` S �.•,--.' , ''�. ..179 /R,, � x < :;[11, h} ✓E + /IaV ty} 1 . 15 t YJ }j�9Yi' � <� 'r Old'.TOwn Well - , -,1• .,� J ��, _ +, p4J $y .hysa tare' :',r t ..4r+k;. 5t1 ",`` i.' P eepr no'WOl'er Pump 110, 9nd s,r .'aj rid '^ �rE k•- -' Ts'� •res. tyb, 'S.. Y Rr. 'r^at ,��..- 's t ,t i r J%. 'r .„ 3 /rO PS.:fd' �Y '.f'£ ...1 mrf :' + $ - ,� r a a 1 i.: /x. r .?C-i 'i p F... ?!r::V.: 1:.. .,. 4 Y 1 ,.F A�..'� E •h'AFW(R4i F '! i..: xy f!� d y�' r:.�`°< d i J 1 .:-..� . . n ,.•. .,� ,.. :)y. w: ..,. .. . . .s -... . .. �« , ,:- :, .,..., YH ,:,,,..} ., 9r r. (1qWeI ., ,•,>N.d�' ?) l titr .i;. er•:min at- lr 1Y'�'.n Led eat X0.;4' ,.. r - , Led oa le 4t 6i9 4`F tt - �� ,des 4 R d To, 5dlem ><,° ,,�?e�"',t�Fse �'q.f6's'5ti'al; ei-min.o4-h7(F '� 5 'rlk• i �kic�ir• ��'-�� &.Mame ails r`; + r tf�rF. Fp. ary 5 ;rr g. . p � s, r•:. A�r i� 6+-T.' i BOSi-On �..:' :.1�, i 1 > ^ Ledge at 541t.T r t r f rt - f 1 t ` .. • .4'' . 3 j. � ly � T� t tra ,� -�' t f :: c :1' :-- .-,, Ix _p MAKL�LCNCAD WAl"ER D P,AtZTJ41r IJT I 1 la4al crmm at468fh TI IOIY� , 6117 ` SOiNS FY1CA W 1 Ledge at 46 R it f LAi`I S140WING LOCA? IC N A J TE ST Y r C 1.,LIS. D IS It',, 19 i i=. . �)` ! 's n t - „y,4✓fes µtJ, e{F z4iw..rr F -s.'ct�.E _..._,�.......e...,r3 . t. tx .c:.nr.: .._.-.i,t bfWM1 tr krvF.�•g r$,,. ..� ib- F. >, C �': t�'�—:4 fi; ✓ si >` t ' i r #1 / fs ` ! ... k 'y >;^.'i1°tY�Vlii',b'� ,L•�,qa ��l t7.� x hs��,�,x S x._F1. .'� c : :..:. -i i... c .`�., •:. :-. '�' ``,` ..fi'a �;t�P `::i1 �°4t ,.y, �..*2 d:a'V"T tk-a�.1t •MT's S+t t �t?'b a�1yy:' ..i �:n0 . Cp� s� 'air"}3t 7.r�1ir�}r� 1� `" i4 �," 0), }S "'e;,P1Ns `l`}rtlI�' � .,_pN.�!�•+,h> iecl ,.l�G✓ •N`S'(•'g'fgI..l'ac.�x!�'x af a+"T . `�� / I t j ' 1 �/� Ca--s—1" pipe .r ro 35d2a3 A $,�$ 7 rjr N INTAKE BA61 RIVE -1411 aSM ot7tsn s.: Q v'ti WELL OREST �' j� :.w Y sY '4• N4j a: TrNvt tk 5t�' �,g;`s V"�i ��, � ;a i > >•� '`��W t � t 5 - '4t ;'i �yi�1��'d '}6 �y�,"�a�� ! `.', 2•j,'�, ".+�,vj,a {2 C3 \ y :fir k � S - 1-N �.t��it�y+-. 2v�,F' ! �M"c �SXV' Q! f J �,�.-E� y Y •��j -��d��i YI' -- i�� +..ea�'3a -.._....., �..�_s..�_ rn.._i._ . v l ee �...�re,�zY ar^Y�l4 •_ a, �^'7'— - ,vM.� .,v+e:.,,:� ��.t: � � wg ' \ " WATER °WORI{s A4"BLEHEAD \ ti PROPOSED ADDITIONAL ' SUPPLY , r i{71A4411 $ FROM s. MEADOW 'fy ` T3 r t is rh SCALE 1 IN, = 375 FT. y��•`, `� ('�U� William S. Johnson C E. x10 - 0� \!' ' , 191.1: _ DEC.' F.) - IOI TQEAIONT CUT. E30$TUN r ! �J iF't Y al s 1 H - e Sd T ✓t � i. ��a ,,,fifiTfi y M: r 1 'fi 'p,¢`aai ptin{.y��p�.PJJ 1 tL,x >' 7SM'}�'{tiwlR10I-zlh .. •ay. � eJ�/: CUO/I///!O////"(/((�/ /l/ // c%��l.l.J/GC�(/..1P.GG.1 ' ANTHONY D COfiTES i., SOD. Commissioner 7273194 935-2160 April 27, 1984 Mr. Gerard McNeil RE: SALEM/WETLANDS 290 Eliot St. File 64-92 Ashland, MA H1721 Highland Ave. - Dear Mr. McNeil: The Northeast Regional Metropolitan Boston Office of the Department of Environ-- mental Quality Engineering has completed its review of the above-referenced file. Pursuant to G.L. Chapter 131, SectKn 40 and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, the Department is denying implementation of the project as proposed for the reasons outlined below. Correspondence from you has quest ono.d the applicability of the "new" (effective date April 1 , 7.983) Wetlands Protection Act Regulations and the validity of the appeal taken in this matter by Purity Supreme. The effective date of the "pew" regulations was April. 1, 1983. Your Notice of. Intent, sent to the Boston Office of the Depart- ment ,was postmarked April 4, 1983. Regarding the filing of a Notice of Intent, the Act states: "copies of such Notice shall be sent to the Conservation Commission" and "at the same time by certified mail to the Department of Environmental Quality Enginecri.nn" . The Department therefore feels this project is regulatable under the April 1, 1983 regulations. It should be noted that as early as April 26, 1983, this office, in a comment to the MEPA Unit of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, went on record as being of the position that this filing was subject to the April 1, 1983 regulations. IC should also be noted that as of April 26, 1983, no Notice of r latent from you had been received by this office (it was received here on April ' 27, 1983) and that the receipt of your application was mailed to you from this office on May 4 , 1983. The Department considers the appeal taken in this matter by the Purity Supreme, Inc. valid, arriving as It did within the ten day time limit and being from an ah"ttor with a long term lease (extending until the year 1999 , with three five year options) . ' No information was presented to this office during the ten day appeal- period opposing, the appear taken by Purity Supremee on a procedural basis. It is important to note that due to the significant adverse impacts to the interests of the Wetlands Protection Act, namely flood control, storm damage prevention, and prevention of pollution and the significant adverse impact to bordering vegetated wetland in excess of those allos.edby thee performance standards stipulated in 310 CMR 10.55 (4) , the Department would also have appealed the Order issued by the Salem Conservation Commission allowing the project as proposed . To compensate for increases :in peal: discharges caused by the future development of. this 150 acre parcel, you have proposed to create retention ponds in areas that currently support mature emergent, scrub-shrub and forestel :wetlands bordering on streams . This process of creating ;ponds requires excavation in each of these areas and taking the elevationof these aruas down ov_r a range of one-half foot to six feet ver- tically from their existing elevations. From : he K for .ation presented by you in The En- vironmental Impact Report of August , 1983 (MEA 14573) a conservation estimate for the amount of wetlands to be excavated is approximately eleven acres (from table 4-5 in the EIR) . This is Far in excess of the amount allowed by 310 CMR 10.55. Therefore the proposed project must be denied as proposed. The Department feels that at a site of this size. development could occur which would not impact wetlands to all extent prohibited by the Wetiand Protection Act Regulations. Therefore the project is denied without prejudice. It is the Department's understanding that at MS ti-!.lc VOU have decided not to build the proposed Pelf course. The plans and written material presented to this office regarding the development of the 90317 course are extremely vague. From the best available information, the Department has determined that the proposed course would also alter an amount of resource area in excess of that allowed by 310 CMP 10.55. Therefore, the Department at this time is also denying implementation of the plans for the 901f course under Chapter 131 , Section 40. Please be advised that it has been the Department's responsibility to address those interests of the Act which are Putwfltlallo affected be the project to determine interests should hp protpcLnd , and to condition the project as necessary how those to More that protection. Should any party dispute these find Lugs, your attention is directed to the attached "NOTICE" regarding an adjudicating hearing. Should a hearing be requested, factual material supporting the objection must be supplied to the Department. Should you have any further questions on this matter, Please contact Mr. Phil DiPietro at this address or phone 935-2160. Very truly yours, William A. 'Krol, P.E. Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer WAK/P-D/gg cc: Salem Conservation Comm 1 Ps 1 on, Town hall , Salem, sb% 01951 Attn: Clenn Yale, Chairman, Charles Fedrickson Agent Atty. Kathryn Walsh, Brown, Rudnick, Freed L Cesmer, Counsellors At Law Atty. John R. Serafini , Attv. at Enw. Federal St. , Sale,, pM 01970 Form 5 0_c_r r ..r;o f 64-92 _—J l a (--=-- — -- (To he pro':-ded by DEC]F.) SALEI t Co rjhonwea1,h c�r, -- of Massachusetts l \FARD COMPA\IES Order of Conditions Massactlasetts Wetiands Prolection tact G.L. c. 1 :331 , §40 Department of Envi.ronmental Quality Engineering From- ',fr. Gerard McNeil The Eafard Cowpanies ._1 (Name of Applicant) (Narne of property owner) 290 Eliot St. , Ashland , hN 290 E1.i.ot St . , Ashland , M4 Address . -_ _ - _ - __ Address ----_.-- This Or der is issued and delivered as fol!ov:s' I] by hand delivery to applicant ur represenl,i:lve r n _-_ _—________ __(date) by certified mail, return receipt re�r��ste:f on . __ __ _ ._ ._ — (date) This proiect i;located at- Ili f;hl.and Ave. , The property is recorded at the Registry o! --E 'sex Book- 5292, 6172 pagc, -734, 73 Certificate (it registered) The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on - . April_ 4, _1984. __ _ _..____—(date) The public hearing was closed on_ __f anuary 12, 1984 (data) Findings Dept. of Env. Quality Enghas reviewed the above-referenced Notice of The— -- ---- -- - - Intent and plans and has held a public hearing or, the project. Based on the information available to the Det. of Tm, Quttl., E.ng,__ atthistime, tho - _lien?_L._ot__Enu-__2,a1_ :_xxgt`''sdaterrnined that the arca on which the-propos.)d work is to he done is sl, nifican! to the i:.ilororng ihtere_Cts in accordance with the Presumptions of Signiticar ce set forth in the regulations for each Area Subiect to Protection Under tho Act(check as appropriate) C8 Public water supply xx Strxm damage prey,ration D Privatewat:;r supply `,-; !'revantion of po!V)n u : Ground water supp!y Land containing shelt'isi; Flood control Fisheries Page 2. ORDER 01' CONDITION'S Findings Continued The Department of Environmental Quality Engineering hereby finds that the den�i.al of this project for the fol Wing rrasonp is necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the r.egul.atilons to protect the above-- enumerated interests: The project involves the excavating of and stripping of vegetation within approximately eleven acres of bordering vegetated wetlands. This is far in excess of the performance standards stipulated in 31.0 CMR 10.55. Therefore, the project is denied as proposed without prejudice. . Findings Pursuant to M.M. Chapter 30 Section 61 to 62H 1_nclusive (N.E.P.A.) A Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for this project was filed on August 31, 1984 , with the Secretary of Environmental Affairs. Said FEIR, EOEA 44573, described the environmental impact of this project and sets forth those measures necessary to minimize and prevent any potential significant adverse impacts to the environment. Said measures were reflected in the conditions of the Secretary's findings issued on October 17, 1984 , stating that the report adequately and properly complied with C.L. Chanter 30, Section 62 to 62H inclusive. := Issued by the Ueparlment of 6r%ironnlentaLQuallty Lnginuir:1; SlgnatU(e_________._GL.',t'G��.`'Ct::;c On this -_ _ day of Apr'i.l t g, _. b tof e me personally appeared Pilliam._n Krol,PI., llepuL� I: -on11 Lnerro me known t�be the person described in and who e1 ccu(ed fhe (o e t)uing ins h unn!nl and ,l. noIlvicdgc d that he/she executed !he same as his/her hee act and dr.��d_ Wary Public h:1y :unrrission ex{ares ----- _ -- — - The aDPlicanL the ov:ner,any person aggrieved ay;h,s Su,ersudln{;Order.an, o•.vner of land abul%ng the land upon which fh,o pro. Posed work o to be dons or any tin persons p1 r 'u'1d to G c ioA. y I OA a.e hareby nolified of their right to request an adjudicatory hearing pursuant to C L 30A, §10 p,ovidir:g HI r.quest is nlZj.fe by cerl ied mail or hand delivery to the Department within len days from the dale o1 issuance of the 3uperscdinu Order,and is eddlessod to Docket Clerk,Office of Generud Counsel,Department o1 Environmental Quality Engin-enng CI.e iNintcr Sirr;u. Boston, AIA o21 Ca. A copy of the request scall at the same llcle be cent by certified mad or hand de5very to the,c onscrvaboll c,ornnl s;�on, the.Ipphr I'll, :ld any other party A Notice of Claim fora Acrudcutull Hearing sh 1 . . i.b;,.�Ih ih1 nnp.0 1. Rules lo!Adjod:ca:ory Proas;dmgs, J to CM(; 1.07(8) and shall conlfn iht- .'dlr.v,11;l iif, unat r - (a) the DEOF welf:IndsFile N:eaber.name:of till,r,,l�6: Int.u111.Id:fi( of lh,.;a,yocl. - (b) the complete u,,.ojo. jIlt 1' h:pl_i r,, ::':.._.r „I 1 ;0t";If, : aid Ari pros' dei by cotinSel rho name ned address of the a tnrn_y, (c) the nitmus aril addra5: J.df ,tlu:r I.;,f e sl-Itr ny'rll of(I)!hr.fr':t . I'ue..r1 n1 ;S Of fill'prnCel'dIng, (2)thn eh ineludinr s e - I .leu ons to IN--,SupnrseU:ng Ord,,F t t dhca 1, Ih nlnm,nr t+hu;h a d y o:c Lu Incuns,shill .nth the Dlpar fluent s Wv! hinds Regulations 131a CMR 0.00)al cl dws not cont,rl t 1 r ho rntl t 11 1 -.tof .L:u,iml n. 1 thi:A(A. ,xl(:I It, .rn dicatory hearimg. a rludl a .I 1 III.ull t - ) - Imf sought through the ad;u- Ylw 1 rlr ..sr 'Inllho`u t it,0rclef. (e) a sldtemelll Ol,ll .I lh:.r q u:J Ifv l ,I :n l 1_ !. .ol, fl. :olva UUtl e.uuu.11:uc,n and each o'har p;uty nn rep. resen4t(ivC or such t'- ftnurrn. �. .. Failure to submit all nocessa:y rnf�-nf ahon m;l, : . I: rs•:;d h rn p� --- , II -I?.rL-n'.nl of the Notice c'Clarm for an ACjudlwtory Heanng Detach on dotted line and submit to the . prior to commencamant of work. ...................... ._................_..................._.......-.........................._.................................................... TO Issrrng Authority Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for file project.-A ----- -- — ------ File Number has been I ecolded at tf-lc Re;ri,if y of - - and has been noted in the chalo of t:L'e of the ,Ile, wil Iaoru I/".ocl.1 WXICI'wah G'nrod CundiGon B on --_ If recorded land, the instrumc-m noulbnr which idcnidrosl th's Ilunsacllim If registered land. C:-r dec Guam:nennt.-.r v;hlUl rtLmIJIe;Rl1$ fc.us.1t ruil s $ignatU/C ---------------------- - Applicant r4 1, 41141 in WAS Ja4uld Wuj jotija0lb, ",jam) Q4jjWUUJjnUj 40 Quw4jej,j losunui Lviouij ju qoIllo PJA WPM jlWAjjJjj MUMS 4" U4 j" PUf JJdJj UdIaMid"S ill ji oluonSS, jj yo DO 10 Se ep ssiujsaq a, W41" Polp4 &4 15" buy"! "a"W"M J04 019LJ 0 Mimi j, -u6jul q isliod 0qj jo an""Sajj" JJ Wei JOq4u qj?o Vus do;Sbym,uj UU144AAOSUDD UQ ' JU21ILM! J41 04 aull am jqj le juas uu;jq s[ Isa"boi ill 10 Mul v lekil quo, 3j js j (,j) UUlP,jsJJj,nS jqup --' PLIL :Jooij4 �"USJJLq*,)k-1 Sd' U 40 4"50124s 95y3l.lUs Puv JyvP 4 kA) WSoq Sp e JOS IsoubW oql q3yqm aada sl3ol Aqq 40 "OLU,p I. ....... .us joga j .jjPJj ,JUpp:.1Sjodrls o"I 01 suornovao sy ja lumlels asyma Pue =13 V (q) "alson" Oulaq S& buy"4 "403IMPP MUM v 4044 luorojels juala 4 M lumoul jL ' SvA&4e1UjSaJUJJ JM4 PUO SM" JOYS Lie lu sjssjjppu ju4 sow, uql W"UJ044e uql 40 ssaippe aue am Jqj ' tZisuno) Xq I)ojuassidli 41 Que 6ulivaq a Jul Q! UUjLjj SIM Jqq 4u i1q4va UUoqjjL04 puv ssavou xvu y4ald.03 owl jJ ; (juy3yLddj 10 1, ` mul/Aam qLJOj jjyj SWIM 30JJ "jQ) asaa aqj 4o awou oq4 554031puf q3f41.1 31114 1 "011u"Jug MMOILY oq4 opnljuy Isaw 6u,jeaA NJ.......F,, ,A SUM I to 40401 v -4% OW; "URAWS Jt; IOU Him M U011304M SPUUI S4SjjV4Uj JL IanJ jyj ;U Uy4eJunoud ULM'S 4 *U4 Pj6Uvq3 a, pinoqs 4� 4lql'i Pue I pinoqs jupjj yypos,,d.. ... .... slqeP Guyjeoq & 3 UUsim oq4 "1000 Qsjnhj xa slael uq4 JU 4UJUJ44is v OJP oijinsy lie q1144 sluavala XjAi oqi LOSsYGYP up jInsai New e;s %"t=j U Jul 4sonboi jq4 ;o lyouliMaj -UJd oil sd P 4jussa" OU P lie It ;ns of ainljoj q.130, Wed Lie lo slinji J41 401 Puy XL4UajJjjjj palpUq as Now Uyje,, V ,, ISM -JJ 43OU MI VJASUa 04 KeSmau SL 0014eQUujug Syql MV U003,4W SPuvlljl A"I jopuf! 4j"Judod " 44 QJOSSY SIUMdU&JU Japjj Qpjsjo6nS p 00 X........... .. .. 4sonboi P JO Ued SP PjjjyLqnS Oq U014MIJUJUY 4 "%"Julv,yPnPPV J04 Wind" S up"J" I" ajynbjJ VON UM Ag .'s6up "JusulM MLend 1211AWuoJjAUj ;U 4USu4j2djj 1,1 "Au Il" JAI .9 J', hIddli ,kdoJ.VJjj;jt1,Jj rijj jldlj 1) 3311JA W lAjiqjj j4l jjjj WYK-' NO auuqdolji J46i Wasnymbs, "ajjsj,.A laoils ialuyq a,) IJTHIJJ WMAD A Aj!Ajj A111joj IMMOHAA A 1.4311-dUdd �� .. Till of �5,Ann, Ans5ar4mvffs 9 (One PaarZr '84 icy L P i .16 (One �alrnt GrEEn ti. rr CE May 23, 1984 SPECIAL PERMIT WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT The Fafard Companies 290 Eliot Street Ashland, MA. 01721 On Thursday, February 16, 1984, the Planning Board of The City of Salem held a public hearing regarding the application of The Fafard Companies for a Special Permit under Section P, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance with respect to the construction of a concrete headwall south of First Street; Salem, MA. - At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board on May 17, 1984, the Board voted, by a vote of six in favor, none opposed, to approve the application"as complying with the requirements for the issuance of the per- , mit with the following conditions: 1. Work shall conform to plan entitled, "Subdivision: Highland Acres, Street Name: Traders Way", dated December, 1983, prepared by Hancock Survey, Danvers; MA. Work shall further conform to the specifications set forth by the Conservation Commission in a letter to the Planning Board dated January "30, 1984. 2. This order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private/public property or any invasion of public/private rights. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans have been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. This Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. Thefeefor recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. Walter B. Power, III 6 Chairman dey oJpp �� IC1J arm (�6yy) ZJ1- V TELEPHONE 631 -4056 ae"^aat, a a2 ^ OFFICE OF � � o 13oord of t'Medmen THOMAS A, MCNULTY, CHAIRMAN ABBOT HALL ARNOLD W. ALEXANDER WILLIAM E. CONLY JOHN E. WHIPPLE JOANNE N. MAYER E. JOAN MARRAFFA, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT MARBLEHEAD, MASSACHUSETTS 01843 February 9, 1984 Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Gentlemen: At a meeting of the Board of Selectmen held on February 8, 1984,. it was voted to go on record that if anything is going to.saffect the reserve water supply for the Town of Marblehead in any way whatever, this Board would be in opposition to any construction, development, alteration, whateverl; that would be harmful to the Thompson's Meadow area. Er:,c very truly yours, E , oan Marraffa Administrative Assistant ejm/dd cc: Salem Water Division Mayor Salvo, Salem Marblehead Conservation Commission Marblehead Water and Sewer Department 1 + t.. 1 z Conservation Commission Salam. Massachusetts OI97O March 7, 1984 Mr. Fred Sullivan, Chairman Marblehead Conservation Commission Abbot Hall Marblehead, MA. 01945 RE: Fafard Project Dear Mr. Sullivan: The Commission is in receipt of a letter sent to the Salem Planning Board regarding any project pending approval in Salem which could have an adverse impact on Thompson's Meadow. As you are aware, the Commission has been reviewing the rafard project for several months and has recently issued an Order of Conditions for the project. I have enclosed a copy for your information. In drafting our conditions, input was requested from the Marblehead Water Department who, upon discussing the matter with their consultant, requested that care -be. taken to insure that no road salt be allowed in the project area which could ultimately leach into Thompson's Meadow. Therefore, a condition was included in the Order to this effect. Further, the Conservation Commission has site plan approval over each phase of the project and can amend the Order to re- flect individual concerns of each phase. The Commission is cognizant of the delicate nature of Thompson's Meadow and will do everything they can to insure. there is no adverse impact on the area. The Conservation Commission has ad- ditionally required that the Clerk of the Works hired by the Planning Board to oversee the project have environmental expertise so that daily inspections of the area can take place and any problems can be dealt with expeditiously. In short, the Commission has endeavored to take every precaution possible to minimize the impact of this project. We would be happy to discuss this with any member of the Marblehead Conservation Commission or other town official at any time. Sincerreelyy yours, Philip D. Moran Chairman dey cc Marblehead Water and Sewer Department E. Joan Marraffa, Administrative Assistant, Board of Selectmen Mayor Anthony Salvo . l J 1Ge��dd(Jamma�zuaeaG�r�� Q�c/�CQ:k'1CLC�CC6P.>CC� C�xecutste © ice�pol(onuixon�meen&l Alla " 700 7�Liimlwpl Awl Radon, d6mac%1ee,6 01,202 MICHAEL S. DUKAKIS GOVERNOR JAMES S. HOYTE SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ON FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROJECT NAME: HIGHLAND ACRES PROJECT LOCATION: SALEM EOEA NUMBER: 4573 PROJECT PROPONENT: WARD COMPANY DATE NOTICED IN MONITOR: SEPTEMBER 9, 1983 The Secretary of Environmental Affairs herein issues a statement that the Final Environmental Impact Report submitted in the above referenced project does adequately and properly comply with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 30, Section 62-62H inclusive, and the regulations implementing MEPA. I find that the responses in the FEIR adequately deal with the issues raised in the comments on the DEIR, and that the revised drainage study adequately responds to the requirements of the scope for the EIR. I recommend that the proponent comply with the request of MHC for a Phase II survey to be conducted on the "ancient road" and that the road be preserved where possible and that the continuity of the road be maintained by relocation where preservation is not possible. October 17 1983 a e es S. e 5pUry COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Illtlli Office of the Secretary of State MASSACHUSETTS 294 Washington Street HISTORICAL Boston, Massachusetts 02108 MICHAEL JOSEPH CONNOLLY COMMISSION 617-727-8470 Secretary of State September 30, 1983 J ' RECEIVED ;X Secretary James S. Hoyte4 a Executive Office of Environmental Affairs OV 100 Cambridge Street OFFU OF THE SECRETARY OF Boston, MA 02202 EIMIROMNENTALAFFAIRS ATTN: MEPA Unit . RE: Highland Acres, Salem EOEA X14573 Dear Secretary Hoyte: Staff of the Massachusetts Historical Commission have recently met with project proponents at the proposed location of the Highland Acres development in Salem. The purpose of the field visit was to examine the existing portion of the ,Ancient Way," a probable 17th century footpath which traverses the City Golf Course and the Highland Acres project area. The "Ancient Way" was identified and tested during the intensive archaeological survey of the project which was conducted by the Institute for Conservation Archaeology, formerly of Harvard University. Through its continued and present use as a footpath, the "Ancient Way" is a fairly well maintained important feature of the historic landscape and early historic transportation systems of the North Shore area. MHC recommends that project proponents evaluate means of preserving the "Ancient Way" such as including it as a footpath in the landscaping plans for Highland Acres, If you have any questions or require further assistance, please feel free to contact Brona Simon at this office. Sincerely, Valerie A. Talmage (3— Executive Director Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Massachusetts Historical Commission VAT/hi xc: Robert Masch i; Fafard Companies Jacob Wolfson, Salem Historic Commission 9 �i rz Conservation Commission Salem. Massachusetts 01970 December 13, 1983 Mr. Dana Snow Superintendent of Water and Sewer Department Town of Marblehead Tower Way Marblehead, MA. 01945 Dear Mr. Snow= The Salem Conservation Commission is currently in the process of finalizing an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act for a project which could have potential impact on the qual- ity of ground water resources in the Thompson's Meadow area. The Commission fully intends to take every precaution pos- sible to minimize the environmental impact of this project in- cluding ordering measures to protect the shallow ground water resources of the Meadow. However, we have not as yet determined - whether .it, is necessary to .order the developer to take additional steps for the protection of the deep bedrock water resources of Thompson' s Meadow. We would like a response from you, and/or the appropriate town officials or consultants as to whether Marblehead anticipates future need to use the deep bedrock water resources of the Meadow. We understand the shallow resources have not been used for a num- ber of years, but please be assured they will be protected. Due to the urgency of this proposal, we would appreciate a response by January 12, 1984. In the meantime , if further infor- mation is required, Mr. David Webster, consultant to the project (371-1692) , Charles Frederiksen, Aide to the Conservation Commis- sion (744-4580) , or myself (367-4000) may be contacted. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, Christopher. Hagger Conservation Commission ` CH. dey cc Mr. Gerard McNeil, Fafard Co . TOWN OF MARBLEHEAD eWater and Sewer Commission P. O. BOX 1108 Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945 Office: Tower Way Dana E. Snow 631-2694 — 631-0102 Superintendent SEWER WATER January 9, 1984 Conservation Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Att: Chris Hagger Gentlemen: At the Regular Meeting of the Board of Water and Sewer Commissioners held on January 3, 1984, the Board Members had a lengthy discussion concerning the proposed project adjacent to the area known as Thompson Meadows. We discussed the future use of the area as a pos- sible water resource. At this time we do not feel with the known potential that it is worth developing. However, we do feel in the not too distant future we may be asked to do so by the M.D.C. In reviewing the materials provided to us by Mr. Frederiksen with our Engineering Con- sultant, the major concern with the project lies with the potential impact upon the meadows area caused by increased storm drainage discharge. We feel there must be some assurances made that the increased runoff from streets in the area will not render Thompson Meadow useless as a future possible water resource due to contamination from road salt. In conferring with our consultants (Haley and Ward of Waltham) on the question of deep rock water, it is their opinion that the possibility for deep bedrock water is extremely remote. This, we feel, only increases our concerns over the shallow water resources of the Thompson Meadow area. We are looking forward to hearing from the Conservation Commission and the Fafard Co. with respect to our concerns. Sincerely, `'mow —, S4 DESK Dana E. Snow cc: Charles Frederiksen, Superintendent Planning Board Salem, MA 01970 Anthony Fletcher, Director Public Services Salem, MA 01970 :l <YJ.t / � alran. Massachusetts 01970 'VASS 1U. July 20, 1983 Mr. John R . Serafini 63 Federal Street Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Mr. Serafini: The Commission has asked that I write and respectfully re- quest that you attend our next meeting on Thursday, July 28, 1983, to discuss moving forward on the Fafard Order of Conditions. Perhaps Mr. Maschi would like to attend as well. I look forward to seeing you then. Si cerely yours, Dale E . Yale Clerk (ley / �i ! -7_ _.; , ��rii•/i�rrii/r� (�ri rrniuiiui/i��Jinr��j (ui�r irtrin� x ANTHONY D.CORTESE, Sc.D. -i;�i- Ir q' -//r.Jinn -�ivr/. ��i/Yi, //-�7('/•I%'I COmmissi.nl, G 727-5194 MEMORANDUM TO: James Hoyte, Secretary, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs- MEPA Unit FROM: William J. St. Hilaire, P.E. ` Regional Environmental Engineer-Northeast Region SUBJECT: Highland Acres, Salem, EOEA #4573 - DEIR The DEIR submitted indicates that 26 acres of wetlands are to be altered for the industrial , residential and commerCial develop- ment of the site and that an additional 13 acres of wetland are to be altered for the golf course portion of the site. These quantities are far in excess of those allowed by the Wetlands Protection Act Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 et. alo 310 CMR 10.55 defines and sets forth presumptions of significance for Bordering Vegetated Wetlands, which comprise the majority, if not all , of the wetlands on the site. General performance standards for Bordering Vegetated Wetlands are also set forth in 310 CMR 10.55. They stipulate that"the issuing authority (either the Salem Conservation Commission or the D.E.Q.E. ) may issue - -•n an Order of Conditions permitting work which results in the loss of to (a maximum of) 5000 square feet of Bordering Vegetated Wetlands when such area is replaced in accordance with the following general conditions and- any additional conditions the issuing authority deems necessary" . The regulations require that .the surface area of the replacement area, to be created shall be equal to that which will be lost. The ground water and surface elevation and the overall horizon- tal configuration and location with respect to the bank of the replacement area must be the same as that of the lost area. The re- placement area must have an unrestricted hydraulic connection to the same water body associated with the lost area and shall be located within the same general area or reach of the waterbody or waterway as the lost area, and at least 75 percent of the surface of the replacement area shall be reestablished with indiginous wetlands vegetation. The regulations also stipulate that the maximum allowable amount y A . I - v'+9•r'�i r�"tc Memorandum =•.. Page 2 April 26, 1983 of Bordering Vegetated Wetland that may be lost as a result of work done by theapplicant compensation is 500 square feet. As presently planned, Highland Acres is not a permittable. site under the Wetlands Protection Act. It should also be noted that the proponents of the project have not yet applied to the Salem Conservation Commission for work to be done on the site and that the submission of an ENF, DEIR or final EIR in no way precludes them from doing so. PD/ib ,Oy C Conservation Commission Salem. Massachusetts 01970 June 3, 1983 Mr. John R. Serafini 63 Federal Street Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Mr. Serafini: At their meeting of May 26, 1983, the Conservation Commission reaffirmed, by .a vote of 4 - 0, their decision of May 4, 1983, to administer the Fafard project under the March 24, 1983 filing. Therefore, per your request of that evening, a Public Hearing has been scheduled for June 9, 1983, at 8:00 p.m. and was ad- vertised in the Salem Evening News for that evening. We look forward to meeting with you and representatives of the Fafard Company at that time. Sincerely yours, 1 Dale E. Yale. Clerk dey Enclosure E SIoN coy C z Conservation Commission J � Salem. Massachusetts 01970 yASSn�� CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Will give a Public hearing at the request of Fafard Companies, 240 Elliott Street, Ashland, MA. on Thursday, June 9, 1983. The purpose of the hearing is to explore the effects of the construction of an industrial/commercial/ residential development on an 138-acre undeveloped site bounded by Highland Avenue, Wilson Street, Swampscott Road, and First Street. The hearing--will be held at One Salem Green, second floor conference room at 8:00 p.m. Philip D. Moran /\ Chairman V June 3 ,;= � `� �fie7JDammanu�erc�i o��/!/�adlaclzccQe�>fd. C�xecrcliase V��rce�po�(�nvtxann�z�en,�u�.S4!��rx5 700 Tia//m�xir�ye Jlxeel .Oa9lan, d4Wad,1esetld 01202 MICHAEL S. DUKAKIS GOVERNOR JAMES S. HorTE CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS SECRETOR`/ ON - - REGti' ��- ---- DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT JUN 8 1983 SALEM PLANNING DEPT. I PROJECT NAME: Highland Acres PROJECT LOCATION: Salem EDEA NUMBER: 4573 PROJECT PROPONENT: Fafard Company DATE NOTICED IN MONITOR: April 25, 1983 The Secretary of Environmental Affairs herein issues a statement that the Draft Environmental Impact Report submitted on the above referenced project does adequately and properly comply.with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 30, Section 62-62H inclusive, and the regulations implementing MEPA. I find that although I have questions about some of the underlying assumptions in the drainage study and some concerns about the amount of wetland to be altered, the DEIR has addressed the issues identified in the Scope. I, therefore, declare the DEIR adequate with the expectation that the following questions will be answered adequately in the FEIR. The FEIR shall contain a copy of this Certificate with my comments, the comments received on the DEIR, and responses to the comments. My specific comments are as follows: Traffic The DEIR shows a significant degradation in capacity at the Swampscott Road/ Highland Avenue and Marlborough Road/Highland Avenue intersections that is attributable to the proposed development. Modifications and signalization are identified as means of minimizing these problems. The FEIR should identify what improvements should occur and who should be responsible for their implementation. FORM D lt4573 Page 2 Wetlands The letter of comment from DEQE implies that this project will be subject to the revised Wetland Regulations. If this is the case, the project, as presented, ! cannot receive permits. Under the old Regulations, the project might receive permits, but issuance of such permits would be clearly opposed to the intent of the Act. I feel that the proponent should develop an alternative scheme, perhaps by reducing density, that would significantly reduce the impacts on wetlands and present such a scheme in the FEIR. Drain$Ee The drainage study presented in the DEIR raises some fundamental questions that must be addressed in detail in the FEIR. The runoff coefficients (c) used in the -drainage study are surprisingly low for such a site. The site is one with frequent rock outcrops, shallow till soils and steep slopes yet the c values range from 0.2 to 0.5 with nearly 240 Ac of the 500± Ac site given a value of only '0.2. This appears to be a significant under- estimation of the runoff coefficient and should be justified in detail or revised for the FEIR. The drainage study should be supported by detailed calculations for before and after development showing (1) detention area capacities and requirements for each drainage area tributary to a detention basin, (2) computation of time of concentration and subsequent rainfall intensity, (3) routing from one ponding area to another to the ultimate discharge point. The plans used in these calculations should represent the latest iteration of the development proposal. Miscellaneous The FEIR should reconcile the discrepency identified by MAPC between the site layout plan and the drainage plan. June 1, 1983 DATE S. 0 CRETARY - - THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS RECEIVE-) WIRY 91983 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY E GINEERING /(( SALEM PLANNING DEPT. METROPOLITAN BOSTON-NORTHEAST R 323 New Boston Street, Woburn, MA 01801 Telephone No. 935-2160 V h21 WE. May 4, 1983 O J TOWN: Salem ASSIr..NW FILE N0. 64-92 The Division of Wetlands is in receipt of an application filed under M.G.L. Chapter 131, Section 40, the application is in the name of: APPLICANT. Highland Realty Trust - c/o John Serafini, Esquire Federal Street - Mailing Address - Fafard Companies Salem, MA 290 Elliott St. , Ashland, M Same as above PROJECT LOCATION.t Highland Ave. , Wilson St. , Swampscott Rd. & First St. e PROJECT REVIEW ( ) The mon is incomplete. No File Numlxr.aill be aaagZ064 LLntj CAU JJl� Cheeked below is submitted to this office: ( ) Notice of Intent and yxvironmental Data Form O Plans ( ) Locus WATERWAYS REVIEW ( ) Project may require a Chapter 91 License - Project has been referred to Waterways. (x) Project does not require a Chapter 91 License. Issuance of a File Number indicates only completeness of the filing submitted, not approval of the application. JS/mes Very truly yours, William J. St. Hilaire, P.E. CC: Regional Environmental Engineer _ + �ui/n ui/r� Lerrrrniurn/ri�,. uri�// /in/rn rrivir/ ANTHONY D.CORTESE, S,.D. �:!•'. 1i 2' .��•J:ca .�i'../ ��i�ipq. . '/-/�//'�(�/ Commissioner ' 7775194 MEMORANDUM April 28, 1983 TO: James Hoyte, Secretary, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs MEPA Unit FROM: William d. St. Hilaire, P.E. C Regional- Environmental Engineer SUBJECT: Highland Acres, Salem, EOEA #4573-DEIR The Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering has been requested to comment on the above referenced project. The Department' s recommendations are contained in the attached memoranda and the applicant is advised to address these recommendations in the environmental impact report. Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Philip DiPetro at 935-2160. WJST/PD/jb 114573 Page 2 Wetlands The letter of comment from DEQE implies that this project will be subject to the revised Wetland Regulations. If this is the case, the project, as presented, cannot receive permits. Under the old Regulations, the project might receive permits, but issuance of such permits would be clearly opposed to the intent of the Act. • I feel, that the proponent should develop an alternative scheme, perhaps by reducing density, that would significantly reduce the impacts on wetlands and present such a scheme in the FEIR. Drainage The drainage study presented in the DEIR raises some fundamental questions .that must be addressed in detail in the FEIR. The runoff coefficients (c) used in the drainage study are surprisingly low for such a site. The site is one with frequent rock outcrops, shallow till soils and steep slopes yet the c values range from 0.2 to 0.5 with nearly 240 Ac of the 500± Ac site given a value of only `0.2. This appears to be a significant under— estimation of the runoff coefficient and should be justified in detail or revised for the FEIR. The drainage study should be supported by detailed calculations for before and after development showing (1) detention area capacities and requirements for each drainage area tributary to a detention basin, (2) computation of time of concentration and subsequent rainfall intensity, (3) routing from one ponding area g to another to the ultimate discharge point. The plans used in these calculations should represent the latest iteration of the development proposal. { Miscellaneous The FEIR should reconcile the discrepency identified by MAPC between the site layout plan and the drainage plan. June 1, 1983 DATE Jt1A S. 0}rf?�a�O CRETARY f 4 N Conservation Commissi®n Salem. Dlassaehusetts 01970 ,i,iss. June 30 , 1983 Mr . William J. St . Hillaire Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Metropolitan Boston, Northeast Region 323 New Boston Street Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 Dear Mr. St. Hillaire : The Salem Conservation Commission would very much like some input from DEQE regarding the Fafard proposal (Highland Acres) which they are currently considering. The Commission feels a project of this magnitude needs a great deal of care- ful thought and attention. The Commission is hopeful that you could attend one of our meetings in the near future . Our next meeting is July 14 , 1983 , at 8 : 00 p.m, One Salem Green, second floor. If possible we would very much appreciate your giving us your thoughts on this pro- posal. Since we no longer have the services of our Aide , Susan Madison, would you kindly contact Commission member James Mac- Dowell at 744-3782 ( days) to confirm this date? The Com- mission looks forward to meeting with you. S�i� erely yours Lel CC�,I. �• C:fi�-- Dale E . Yale Clerk dey is-Di DRAINAGE -- RUNOFF- I e A 0 � :8 y^Ra in tiA A ua j ue FIG. A.- ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, FIG. B. - ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, FIG. D- ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 2 YEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 10.YEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 50 YEARS. l Y � FIG. D.-ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, FIG.E.-ONE-HOUR AINFALL,IN.INCHES, FIG. F.- ONE-HOUR RAINFALL.IN INCHES, TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 5 YEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 25 YEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 100 YEARS. COMPUTATION OF L 1N RATIONAL FORMULA. MP1E:.4s5ume execfonceriod =5 earsSee iDosinllit ;4L1100 theIhour,Intensity-175%n.per hour. FIG.&INTENSITY EXPECTATION FOR ONE-HOUR RAINFALL'. 71 000 -$00 35 Boo Too 600 30-: o_o 500 PoVCd A0650 f. 0 D17C/I f(OIV 0 F 300 0 10 z P F 0 W n 9 cc EXAMPLE:[i_ven:Arco-/0 acres,overage gross W $00 Bere W 20- Z 0 5a-focc,/0nges/oral/ood lebw =200 A of d%grade a ,. Soil I- J - = 9 Ditch flow =150R&O5%giva$ U -W FL 70 find i Z ~ Poo,amm K �. p For Overland f/ow, xc F/0.H of lef} =15 Min. Sor/�e i 0 0 5 o F In 7 For Di/ch f/on;assume frio10=3 cfs.,enkr n Avec Gros U _ W C/WA'At,505,,finddifch=D-1,V-17iLperje.. CL Imo' C to to IS _0 = 6 • Ditch Jime- /50 = 15 F. 5o Surface \ IO J F z Avx Go In - so Denae ~\ z° F ��'i, a i Conccntrofion Hme =I6SMi2 W To Gross \ SZ, w 5p* ° I- }, 5 fnler.1.75 Curve from FIa.D 0 60' U Z H above, find [-3.8. J 50 E1AM/- 20 a z Z 4 a° = 4o - 90 OU Z 3 3 � Io _ o $O AD w 30 9 J _j < Z Z 1 < B Q o 20 cc 0111 1_ 0 10 20 30, 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 I A 7 �i6sM;a. DURATION IN MINUTES - 10 Concenlrofion. Jima in Examplc. FIG• H- OVERLAND 6 , FIG. J-VALUES OF 1 FLOW, TIME. RAINFALL INTENSITY-DURATION LReproduced from Miscel14neo✓s Publico/ion A/$.206, U5. Dep/, of Agricuil carer byy David L. Yonne//. r adepfed from Eng:bcering Menvo/ of the HonOe oortment Por DRAINAGE - RUNOFF- 2 Q =ACL RATIONAL FORMULA (Logical opprooc ). Q =RUNOFF a Peok discharge of watel'Shed in cubic feet per second (c.f.'s.) due fo maximum Storm O`554//77e& . See Fiys.Afo F Py. /8-0/ (Uouo//y /O -25yeor-s), A =Arco ofwofershed in acres. C =Co¢fficient of runoff, Tob/eB6akw(Measure of/osses duc fo infiltration, etc.), f /n.tensify o{ro/nfa// %n inches perhour based on concentrotiors timE,see Pg./8-0% Concentration time time required farroin fo//iny of,7no l re wote point}o reach discharge voint Gbncentrotion time rnoy h7CIU&C Oyer/and {/ow time, Fiy, N, Py./8 0/ and Channel flow /ime, Pg. 18-051 18-06, 18-69 and 1,9-71. TABLE A-COMPUTATION FORM FOR RATIONAL FORMULA. LOCATION A TIME of DESIGN PROFILE FL7w'MIN. HAN- CAPA- V INV. INV. IN TIME L NEL SLOPE CITY ft. T� ELEV ELEV. INCRE TO 0 OR, ft. n FULL er, LENGi FALL L056E5 UPPER LOWS STREET FROM TO NENT OTA c CHAT/ OF arFf. V Pt, ft. INLE NEL CONC * C-0 PIPE P c.fs. Sec. f}' END END SIZE 'I' f/R5T SrtjCtD Al.8 1.8 .44 16.5 0.3 /G5 3•B 30 1$" .008 .o/5 4.6 3.9 60 0.48 0 82.00 8152 MAIN RD /.9 3.7 .50 2.5 l6.6 3.7 fab D-2 .011 .030 12-0. 2.6 '420 4.62 0 8152.7690 " 2.01"k 7 .50 1 A8.1/6-3 3.5 /0- 11" .00 .015 11.1 4.5 1480 3.36 2.20 74.70 70.34 k'No)`e )`hot Mc .s¢qu¢nce of design es in exomp/e, Fig.J, Pg./8-01in✓o/Ver triol assumptions in determining r. 'i'Fo// in monho/e. RUNOFF VALUE Vnwe ev TABLE B - VALUES OF C = CTM{R ,eA/NPALL PROPOSED AUTHORITY $ u P, FACES MIN. MAX MIN. MAX. ROOFS , ,slag t0 meta/. 0.90 1.00 0.70 0.95 Concrete or Aspho/l. 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 03 PAVEMBN75 8ituminousMocodnrn open and a/oscd t ¢. 0.70 0.90. .0.70 0.90 Q Grove , from clean orad /nose. ro e% a orad cern act. 0.25 0.70 0.15 0.30 OI R.R. YArd05 0.10 0.30 0. 10 0.30 0 SAND, from uniform groin size,no fines, Bore 0.15 0.50 0.01 0.55 fo we// graded, soma C/ay or si/f- /% h; lVe etotloi7 0.10 O.eo 0.01 0.55 Dense tle elation 0.05 0.30 0.01 O.S5 LOAM, from .5ondy or grove/ly to -` BorE: 0.20, 0.60 c/oyey. i ht keqe1oll6n 0. 10 0.45 EARTH Dense ✓e efof/on 0.05 0.35- 54(R, 'ACEs GRgVEL, from clean grove/ and grovel Bore 0.25o.sS Sand m ixtures, no si/t or c/ay /o high Li ht ✓e efofion 0.15 0.50 Clo or si/t Content. Den a ✓c eto-lvn 0.10 MAO CLAY, {rom coorsc sor,dy or silty fo 3or'e 0.36 0.75 0.10 0.70 pure colloidal clays_ Li t Ya efofion 0. 2o 0.60 0.10 0.70 en5C Ye efofion 0.15 0.50 0.10 o.7O Choy,bus%Hess areas. - 10.60 0.75 0.60 0.95 OMPOS/TE Crt dense residentiol oreos vor '75,/0soi/ono' ve elation. 0.50 0.65 0.30 0.60 AREAS Suburban residential oreos, �• •I 0.35 -0.55 0.2.5 0.40 Rural DistricfS .0.10 0.25 0.10 O.25 Por,Es, Ga/f Courses,.etc., 0.10 0.35 0.05 0.25 Q No TE; Iralues of C "for earth surfaces are further varied by degree of sofcrrotion, com,000tion, surfocc /rregu/orjty one Slope, by character Of Subsoil, and by presence of frost or ylozcd- Snow or ice. © Bryon/ ¢I Kuichling, Report, Bock Boy Sewerage bisfr/ce, Bos/on, /909. Qz Metcalf and Eddy, Amer/con Sewerage Proct ce , 1928. M` Craw-Hill. Q Used by City of Boston, reported by Metcalf.$e Eddy. ® Used by City of Detroit repd,-ted by Metco/f ' Eddy, © L. C. //r9ufiort, Civil F/7_q/neeriny //andb0o./<--, 1940. M` Graw-gill. HIGHLAND ACRES - SALEM, MA. nAA"-k# OWNER and Highland Realty Trust p ROBEHI r" PETITIONER The Fafard Companies E. m,V . MASCHca I ENG'R and L.S. : Robert E. Maschi 9N0 2ss550 !p ONAl EN6 Run-Off Calcs. By "Rational Method" (0 = Aci) 1100 = 3.0 inches in one hour i 50 = 2.6 inches in one hour i 25 = 2.3 inches in one hour i 10 = r 1.8 inches in one hour Pipe Capacities Using: Seelye Design (18-06) Total Water Shed Area: 492± Acres Allowable Q Factor on existing drain pipes and culverts are all figured on a 100 year storm to show maximum impact. Total Water Shed Area was divided into 18 seperate sections to determine existing and proposed run-off conditions. I RATIONAL METHOD: Q = Aci = Cu. Ft. per Sec. DRAIN AREA "i" AREA IN C 100 Q100 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 5.2 5.2 96 96 2 14± 0.5 0.6 6.5 6.9 48 58 3 18± 0.4 0.7 5.3 6.9 38 100 4 10± 0.4 0.7 6.0 7.0 24 49 5 6± 0.4 0.7 6.0 7.3 14 31 6 10± 0.4 0.6 6.2 6.8 25 41 7 10± 0.3 0.4 5.8 6.0 18 24 8 12± 0.3 0.4 5.8 6.0 21 29 9 16± 0.3 0.5 5.8 6.2 28 50 10 4± 0.3 0.5 6.2 6.5 8 13 11 4± 0.3 0.5 6.0 6.2 8 12 12 12± .0.2 0.5 5.7 6.2 14 37 13 34± 0.2 0.4 5.4 6.0 37 82 14 14± 0.3 0.4 . 5.2 5.8 22 33 15 20± 0.2 0.2 4.8 4.8 20 20 16 22± 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 19 19 17 60± 0.2 0.2 4.3 4.3 52 52 18 134± 0.4 0.4 4.8 4.8 258 258 TOTAL 492± 750± 1004± RATIONAL METHOD: DRAIN AREA " " AREA IN i50 450 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 4.8 4.8 88.3 88.3 2 14± 0.5 0.6 5.8 6.2 40.6 52.1 3 18± 0.4 0.7 4.8 6.2 34.6 78.1 4 10± 0.4 0.7 5.5 6.3 22.0 44.1 y 5 6± 0.4 0.7 5.5 6.8 13.2 28.5 6 10± 0.4 0.6 5.7 6.0 22.8 36.0 7 10± 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.5 15.6 22.0 8 12± 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.5 18.7 26.4 9 16± 0.3, 0.5 5.2 5.7 25.0 45.6 10 4± 0.3 0.5 5.7 5.8 6.8 11.6 11 4± 0.3 0.5 5.5 5.7 6.6 11.4 12 12± 0.2 0.5 5.0 5.7 12.0 34.2 13 34± 0.2 0.4 4.8 5.5 32.6 74.8 14 14± 0.3 0.4 4.8 5.2 20.2 29.1 15 20± 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 16.8 16.8 16 22± 0.2 0.2 3.7 3.7 16.3 16.3 17 60± 0.2 0.2 3.8 3.8 45.6 45.6 18 134± 0.4 0.4 4.2 4.2 225.1 225.1 TOTAL 492± 662.8 886.1 A RATIONAL METHOD- DRAIN AREA VIC" flit, AREA AREA IN 25 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 77.3 77.3 2 14± 0.5 0.6 5.2 5.5 36.4 77.0 3 18± 0.4 0.7 4.2 5.5 30.2 69.3 4 10± 0.4 0.7 5.0 5.8 20.0 40.6 5 6± 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.2 12.0 26.0 6 10± 0.4 0.6 5.1 5.5 20.4 33.0 7 10± 0.3 0.4 4.7 5.0 14.1 20.0 8 12± 0.3 0.4 4.7 5.0 16.9 24.0 9 16± 0.3 0.5 4.7 5.1 22.6 40.8 10 4± 0.3 0.5 5.1 5.2 6.1 10.4 11 4± 0.3 0.5 5.0 5.1 6.0 10.2 12 12± 0.2 0.5 4.5 5.1 10.8 30.6 13 34± 0.2 0.4 4.2 5.0 28.6 68.0 14 14± 0.3 0.4 4.2 4.7 17.6 23.5 15 20± 0.2 0.2 3.8 3.8 15.2 15.2 16 22± 0.2 0.2 3.3 3.3 14.5 14.5 17 60± 0.2 0.2 3.4 3.4 40.8 40.8 18 134± 0.4 0.4 3.8 3.8 203.7 203.7 TOTAL 492± 579.1 824.9 RATIONAL METHOD: DRAIN AREA " " AREA IN C i10 410 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 3.5 3.5 64.4 64.4 2 14± 0.5 0.6 4.3 4.7 30.1 39.5 3 18± 0.4 0.7 3.5 4.7 25.2 59.2 4 10± 0.4 0.7 4.1 4.8 16.4 33.6 5 6± 0.4 0.7 4.1 5.2 9.8 21.8 6 10± 0.4 0.6 4.2 4.6 16.8 27.6 7 10± 0.3 0.4 3.9 4.1 11.7 16.4 8 12± 0.3 0.4 3.9 4.1 14.0 19.7 9 16± 0.3 0.5 3.9 4.2 18.7 33.6 10 4± 0.3• 0.5 4.2 4.3 5.0 8.6 11 4± 0.3 0.5 4.1 4.2 4.9 8.4 12 12± 0..2 0.5 3.8 4.2 9.1 25.2 13 34± 0.2 0.4 3.6 4.1 24.5 55.8 14 14± 0.3 0.4 3.5 3.9 14.7 21.8 15 20± 0.2 0.2 3.1 3.1 12.4 12.4 16 22± 0.2 0.2 2.6 2.6 11.4 11.4 17 60± 0.2 0.2 2.7 2.7 32.4 32.4 18 134± 0.4 0.4 3.1 3.1 166.2 166.2 492± 487.7 658.0 Refer to Drainage Plan A. Drain Areas No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17 and 18 flow from Highland Avenue through the Golf Course and exits at the existing 4' x 4' box culvert at Boston & Maine Railroad tracks. The watershed area consists of approximately 400± acres and slopes from 5% to 20%. B. Drain Areas No. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 (total 54± Acres) flow from approximately 1,000' inside the project area and enters Swampscot Road at various locations to "Thompsons Meadow". C. Drain Areas No. 10, 14 and 15 (total 38t Acres) flow from approximately 1,000' inside the project area and enters directly into "Thompsons Meadow". D. Storage area on the Golf Course, along the railroad tracks, consists of approximately 28t Acres to elevation 25.0± which is critical. The railroad tracks will be breached at any- thing above the 25 foot elevation. 1. Storage Capacity equals 7,300,000 Cu. Ft. or Approximately 54,600,000 Gallons. 2. Existing Culvert Allows: 170± C.F.S. 3. 2100 (Exist.) equals 594± C.F.S. 2100 (Prop.) equals 7631 C.F.S. 4. Storage Time equals 3.4 hours. 5. Maximum Elevation of flooding for 100 year storm equals 22.5 feet. 6. Conclusion: The Storage Area with the exist- ing culvert make an excellent storage basin and control structure as they presently exist; also controlling flows to the existing three 36" culverts on Jefferson Avenue. E. Storage Area along the proposed road through the Golf Course at Station 15 + 0 to 23 + 0 collects most of the run-off from Drain Area. No. 1 and is approximately 63 Acres. Our intent is to construct a 13 Acre pond for retention and to water the greens on the Golf Course, but not to impede the flow of water or create any additional flooding. Street drainage would also be added to this storage area for maintaining a constant water level. F. Storage Area at No. 13 is the second most critical retention area within the project and enters the proposed Golf Course Road at Station 33 + 0. The outlets for this area should be modified, for a 100 year storm, to retain water levels at Elevation 100.0± and to control its outflow at a constant rate. In doing so, we will be able to divert much of the run-off that presently flows to Swampscot Road, thus reducing the problems with existing culverts and drains, which would presently be inadequate to handle a storm of this size. The storage time that this elevation would be maintained is approximately 2 hours. G. Storage Areas at No. 8 and 12 would be converted into ponds and retention areas which would work in conjunction with diverting run-off from Swampscot Road. The proposed pond at No. 12 would be controlled to a maximum water level of Elevation 113.0±. The proposed pond at No. 8 would be controlled to a maximum water level of Elevation 120.03. Both proposed ponds would also receive street drainage. FLOW PATTERN - 100 YEAR STORM 1 DRAINAGE PROPOSED AREA EXISTING FzNAL NO. EXISTING PROPOSED 100 100 1 Basin "B" to "A" Same (96) 96 c.f.s. 2 Basin "C" to "A" Same (48) 58 c.f.s. 3 Basin "C" to "A" Same (38) 100 c.f.s. 4 Basin "C" to "A" Same (24) 49 c.f.s. 5 Swampscott Road Basin "C" to "A" (14) 31 c.f.s. 6 Swampscott Road Basin "C" to "A" (25) 41 c.f.s. 7 Swampscott Road Same (18) 24 c.f.s. 8 Basin "E" to "C" to "A" Same (21) 29 c.f.s. 9 Swampscott Road Thompsons Meadow (28) 50 c.f.s. 10 Thompsons Meadow Same ( 8) 13 c.f.s. 11 Swampscott Road Same ( 8) 12 c.f.s. 12 Basin "D" to "C" to "A" Same (14) 37 c.f.s. r 13 Basin "C" to "A" Same (37) 82 c.f.s. 14 Thompsons Meadow Same (22) 33 c.f.s. 15 Thompsons Meadow Same (20) 20 c.f.s. 16 Basin "A" Same (19) 19 c.f.s. 17 Basin "A" Same (52) 52 c.f.s. 18 Basin "A" Same 258 258 c.f.s. EXISTING PROPOSED RUN-OFF AREA Q100 Q100 Swampscott Road 93± c.f.s. 36± c.f.s. Thompsons Meadow 50± c.f.s 116± c.f.s. Basin "E" 21± c.f.s. 29± c.f.s. Basin "D" 14± c.f.s. 37± c.f.s. Basin "C" 147± c.f.s. 361± c.f.s. (2 hour storage) Basin "B" 96± c.f.s. 96± c.f.s. Basin "A" 329± c.f.s. 329± c.f.s. (3 hour storage) CONCLUSION: (Based on 100 Year Storm) The Preceeding calculations, with the proposed retention areas and control structures, show the following results: 1. The run-off to Swampscot Road would be reduced from approximately 93± c.f.s. to 363 c.f.s. , by almost 40%, thus substantially eliminating the drainage problems that can be anticipated in the existing drainage system. 2. The Run-off to Thompsons Meadow would be increased from approximately 50 c.f.s. to 116± c.f.s. ; however, due to the size and storage capacity of this area, also the decrease in run-off from Swampscott Road, there would be a minimal impact to Thompsons Meadow and the down- stream properties. 3. Controls of Basin "E" and "D" which flow directly to Basin "C", with a sgrage time at Basin "C" of approxi- mately 2 hours, would keep outflows at the same or re- ducedrate after construction of the project as now flow without any construction. 4. Control of Basin "B", which flows to Basin "A", would maintain a no increase in run-off. 5. Existing Basin "A" of approximately 28± Acres and its 4' x 4' box culvert, provide more than 3 hours of stor- age time for over 54,000,000 gallons of water. This Basin makes an excellent natural storage area as it presently exists, also controlling flows to the existing triple 36" culverts on Jefferson Avenue. 6. The overall drainage pattern is greatly improved with the proposed storage areas and their control structures, also by diverting flows from overloaded drainage areas to less critical areas, the downstream properties will have a much reduced flooding crest after completion of the project. These conclusions are derived from the cal- culations based on a 100 Year Storm and it should be noted that the impacts based on a 50 Year, 25 Year and 10 Year Storm show even greater control and less impact after con- struction than before construction. HIGHLAND ACRES - SALEM, MA 5/18/83 LIST OF ABUTTERS MAP/LOT OWNER/ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS 6/14 N/F Carmine & Angelo Mongiello 55 Eastman Ave 120 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Swampscott, MA 01907 8/143 N/F Salvatore & Ann E. Spinale 1 DiPietro Ave 3 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/144 N/F Stutz Plaisted 3 Parish Rd 2 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Georgetown, MA 01833 8/99 N/F Tri-City Sales 272 Highland Ave 14-16 Marlborough Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/141 N/F Consolidated Capital Properties III 1900 Powell Street 227 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Emeryville, CA 94608 8/129 N/F Louis Arvanites & Assoc. 274 Highland Ave 287-295 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/130 N/F Anarpet Realty Corporation 26 Valley Street 297 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/131 N/F Wescott Realty Trust 303 Highland Ave 303 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/132 N/F Wescott Realty Trust 303 Highland Ave 305 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/133 N/F Frank R. D'Amato 1 Livermore Rd 305R Highland Ave, Salem, MA Boxford, MA 01921 8/138 N/F Stutz Plaisted 3 Parish Rd 305 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Georgetown, MA 01833 - 1 - 8/139 N/F Stutz Plaisted 3 Parish Rd 309-311 Highland Ave, Salem MA Georgetown, MA 01833 8/145 N/F Loyal Order of Moose Inc. Highland Ave Salem Lodge 218 Salem, MA 01970 313-321 Highland Ave, Salem, MA 8/146 N/F Loyal Order of Moose Inc. Highland Ave Salem Lodge 218 Salem, MA 01970 313-321 Highland Ave, Salem, MA 8/119 N/F Anthony P & Camillea A Ventrice 248 Highland Ave 248 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/118 N/F Francis W & Maria M Chase 250 Highland Ave 250 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/117 N/F Charles J & Romilda V. Meneades 8 Verona St. 260 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/104 N/F Tri-City Sales 272 Highland Ave 262-268 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/100 N/F Samuel Rome 400 Paradise Rd 272 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Swampscott, MA 01907 8/34 N/F Marlborough Realty Trust 140 Livingstone Ave 276 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Beverly, MA 01915 8/33 N/F Louis Arvanites & Assoc 274 Highland Ave 278-280 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/32 N/F WJ & EA Giantonio 282 Highland Ave 282 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/31 N/F Andrew Nicastro 286 Highland Ave 284-286 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 - 2 - 8/30 N/F Joseph & Leonora Gallo 288 Highland Ave 288 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 8/29 N/F Messina Trust 11 Marlborough Rd c/o Messina L. Deschamps Trustee Salem, MA 01970 296 Highland Ave, Salem, MA 8/28 N/F Stephen D. Procopio 300 Highland Ave 300 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 7/68 N/F City of Salem City Clerk 12-34 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Town Hall , Salem, MA 01970 7/67 N/F Colonial Realty Trust 5 Colonial Rd 36 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 7/66 N/F Joseph G. Ragone 437 Main St. 38-52 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Lynnfield, MA 01940 7/65 N/F A & J Realty Trust 29 Swampscott Ave 54 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Swampscott, MA 01907 7/64 N/F A & J Realty Trust 29 Swampscott Ave 56 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Swampscott, MA 01907 7/63 N/F Helen S. King 109 Lynnshore Dr. 58-96 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Lynn, MA 01901 7/62 N/F North Shore Tennis & Squash Club x N 98 Swampscott Rd 98 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 7/61 N/F North Shore Tennis & Squash C1ub ,1— 98 Swampscott Rd 100-114 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 11/2 N/F Lynn Sand & Stone Co. Danvers Rd 149 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Swampscott, MA 01907 11/3 N/F Town of Marblehead 156 Elm St. 161 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Marblehead, MA 01945 - 3 - 11/4 N/F Town of Marblehead 156 Elm St. 161 Swampscott Rd, Salem, MA Marblehead, MA 01945 11/6 N/F Town of Swampscott Town Hall Thompson's Meadow, Swampscott, MA Swampscott, MA 01907 13/1 N/F Robert J. Kart 729 Western Ave 204 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Magnolia, MA 01930 13/6 N/F Pequot Assoc. 4 Faneuil Hall First Street, Salem, MA Boston, MA 02109 c/o Arthur Winn 13/7 N/F Salem Housing Authority 27 Charter St. First Street, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 13/8 N/F City of Salem (conservation) City Clerk, Town Hall First Street, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 13-4 N/F Vincent Potato Chip Co. , Inc. P.O. Box 3004 201 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 13-5 N/F N. E. Power Co. 25 Research Ave 199 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Westboro, MA 01581 13/10 N/F City of Salem (conservation) City Clerk, Town Hall First St., Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 13/2 N/F Saltz Family Re. . 1000 Paradise Rd 207 Highland Ave, alem, MA Swampscott, MA 01907 14/213 N/F City of Salem (H.S. ) City Clerk, Town Hall 77 Wilson St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/301 N/F John S. Cappuccio 45 Warren St. 166 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 - 4 - 14/302 N/F Roger R. Belanger 162 Highland Ave 162 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/288 N/F Grace Cunha 156 Highland Ave 156 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/289 N/F Alexie C. Blanaru 154 Highland Ave 154 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/285 N/F Victor J. Devoe 150 Highland Ave 150 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/286 N/F James F. Pettipaw 146 Highland Ave 146 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/287 N/F Janice E. Jones 144 Highland Ave 144 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/264 N/F Catherine S. Criscenti 140 Highland Ave 140 Highland Ave, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 14/192 N/F Donald S. Emmerton 141 Highland Ave 11 Willson'Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 22/1 N/F Salem Acres, Inc. 71 Hancock St. Surrey Road Rear, Salem, MA Everett, MA 01249 23/56 N/F George L & Helen Cappuccio 65 Willson St. 65 Willson St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 23/55 N/F Paul H. Michaud 6 Story Rd 6 Story Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 23/54 N/F Norman J & Georgette A Bedard 8 Story Rd 8 Story Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 23/53 N/F Richard F & Marjorie I Caliri 10 Story Rd 10 Story Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 23/52 N/F Norman J & Mary T Michaud 12 Story Rd 12 Story Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 - 5 - f 23/51 N/F City of Salem (Castle Hill 14 Story Rd Playground) Salem, MA 01970 14 Story Rd, Salem, MA 23/2 N/F Donald S & Ann J Emmerton 141 Highland Ave Story Rd, Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 23/3 N/F Roman Catholic Archbishop Chancery Office 2121 Commonwealth Ave Brighton, MA 02135 23/1 N/F City of Salem Golf Course City Clerk, Town Hall 15 Willson St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 23/229 N/F Mark J Lombard 26 Parallel St. 26 Parallel St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 23/235 N/F MBTA Dir. of Real Estate 50 High Street Boston, MA 02110 24/25 N/F Alcide G & Marie P Ouellette 58 Willson St. 58 Willson St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 24/24 N/F Thomas J Burke - Etali 62 Willson St. 62 Willson St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 24/23 N/F George W. Weil , Jr. 66 Willson St. 66 Wilson St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 24/211 N/F Boston & Maine Railroad 150 Causeway St. c/o Edmund LeBlanc Boston, MA 02114 24/16 N/F N. E. Power Co. 25 Research Dr. 82 Willson St. , Salem, MA Westboro, MA 01581 24/17 N/F Robert F. Griffin 80 Willson St. 80 Willson St. , Salem, MA Salem, MA 01970 - 6 - *r� m f h m HMM Associates , 255 Bear Hill Road Waltham, MA 02154(617)890-6933 4L C NOV 2 9 1982 November 24, 1982 To whom it may concern: Enclosed is a copy of the Environmental Notification Form for Highland Acres in Salem, submitted to the Secretary of Environ- mental Affairs pursuant to 301 CMR 10.04. If you have any questions, please call me. Very truly yours, -s Margaret B. Briggs f , P. 1 APPENDIX A COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM I. SUMMARY A. Project Identification 1. Project Name Highland Acres 2. Project Proponent The Fafard Companies Address 290 Eliot St. , Ashland, MA B. Project Description: (City/Town(s) Salem 1. Location within city/town or street address Highland Avenue 2. Est.Commencement Date: Summer 1983 Est, Completion Date: 1988 Approx. Cost $ 67 Million Current Status of Project Design: 15 % Complete C. Narrative Summary of Project Describe project and give a description of the_general project boundaries and the present use of the project area. (If necessary,use back of this page to complete summary). The proposed project consists of industrial, commercial and residential develop- ment on a 138 acre undeveloped site in Salem. The project will include 45,000 SF of commercial space; 305,000 SF of industrial space; and 750 condominiums grouped in four- plex units. In addition, 9 holes will be added to the Highland Park municipal golf course. Access to the project will be mainly from Highland Avenue. Other access roads will intersect Swampscott Road and Willson Road. Commercial space abuts Highland Avenue, with industrial space behind it. The residential units will be located behind the industrial space, abutting the golf course. Development is planned to adhere to existing land contours as much as possible. A retention pond will collect site drainage, and serve as an aesthetic amenity. Copies of this may be obtained from: Name: Margaret Briggs Finn/Agency: HM Associates Inc. Address: 255 Bear Hill Rd. , Waltham. MA Phone No. 890-6933 1979 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT NOTICE. COMMENT PERIOD IS LIMITED. For Information, call (617) 727-5830 P.2 Use This Page to Complete Narrative, if necessary. This project is one which is categorically included and therefore automatically requires preparation of an Environmental Impact Report:YES X NO D. Scoping(Complete Sections 11 and III first,before completing this section.) 1. Check those areas which would be important to examine in the event that an EIR is required for this project. This information is important so that significant areas of concern can be identified as early as possible, in order to expedite analysis and review. Construc- Long Construc. Long tion Tenn don Term Impacts Impacts Impacts Impacts Open Space&Recreation. .. .. .. X Mineral Resources.. . . . . . . . .. . . Historical.. .... . . . . . . . . ... ... Energy Use . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . Archaeological ... . . . . . . . . . ... __X__WaterSupply&Use... . . . . . . .. . Fisheries&Wildlife .. . . . . . . . .. . Water Pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vegetation,Trees. .. .. . . . .. . . . . AirPollution. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . Other Biological Systems . . . . . .. Noise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . X Inland Wetlands... . . . . . . . . . . .. X X Traffic.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X Coastal Wetlands or Beaches . . . . Solid Waste . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flood Hazard Areas... . . ... . . . . Aesthetics . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. Chemicals,Hazardous Substances, Wind and Shadow . .. . . . . . . . . . . High Risk Operations.. . . ... X Growth Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Geologically Unstable Areas. .. .. Community/Housing and the Built Agricultural Land ... ..... .. .. . . Environment. . . . .. .. . .. .. . Other(Specify) .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. List the alternatives which you would consider to be feasible in the event an EIR is required. The No—Build alternative is the only one that would be considered. P.3 E. Has this project been filed with EOEA before? Yes No X IfYes,EOEA No. EOEA Action? F. Does this project fall under the jurisdiction of NEPA? Yes No X If Yes,which Federal Agency? NEPA Status? G. List the State or Federal agencies from which permits will be sought: Agency Name Type of Permit MDPW Curb—cut DWPC Sewer Extension State Legislative Approval Land Swap H. Will an Order of Conditions be required under the provisions of the Wetlands Protection Act(Chap.131,Section 40)? Yes X No DEQE File No.,if applicable: 1. List the agencies from which the proponent will seek financial assistance for this project: Agency Name Funding Amount EOTC Public Works and $500,000 Economic Development Grant (Pursued by the City of Salem) 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Include an original 81h x11 inch or larger section of the most recent U.S.G.S. 1:24,000 scale topographic map with the project area location and boundaries clearly shown. Include multiple maps if necessary for large proj- ects. ro}ects. Include other maps,diagrams or aerial photos if the project cannot be dearly shown at U.S.G.S. scale. If available,attach a plan sketch of the proposed project. B. State total area of project: 138 acres Estimate the number of acres(to the nearest 1/10 acre)directly affected that are currently: 1. Developed . .. . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . acres 4. Floodplain . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . _acres 2. Open Space/Woodlands/Recreation _M acres 5. Coastal Area .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . _acres 3. Wetlands.. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . 5 acres 6. Productive Resources Agriculture . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . _acres Forestry . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . _acres Mineral Products .. . . . .. . . . . . . _acres C. Provide the following dimensions,if applicable: Length in miles Number of Housing Units 750 Number of Stories 3 Existing Immediate Increase Due to Project Number of Parking Spaces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . _0 2.375 Vehicle Trips to Project Site(average daily traffic). . . .. . . . . 0 5,725 Estimated Vehicle Trips past project site. .(?M.?"). . . . . 2681 642 *See Nate #1 D. If the proposed project will require any permit for access to local or state highways, please attach a sketch showing the location of the proposed driveway(s)in relation to the highway and to the general development plan; identifying all local and state highways abutting the development site;and indicating the number of lanes,pave- ment width,median strips and adjacent driveways on each abutting highway;and indicating the distance to the nearest intersection. P.4 111. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Instructions:Consider direct and indirect adverse impacts,including those arising from general construction and operations.For every answer explain why significant adverse impact is considered likely or unlikely to result. Also,state the source of information or other basis for the answers supplied.If the source of the information, in part or in full,is not listed in the ENF,the preparing officer will be assumed to be the source of the information. Such environmental information should be acquired at least in part by field inspection. A. Open Space and Recreation 1. Might the project affect the condition,use or access to any open space and/or recreation area? Yes X No Explanation and Source: The project site is currently undeveloped open space. In its current condition, the site has relatively little recreational value. As part of the proposed project, the proponent plans to build an additional 9 holes on the public Highland Park Golf Course abutting the site. This aspect of the project will improve the recreational value of currently undeveloped land. The overall impact of this project on open space and recreation will be positive. Source: The Fafard Companies. B. Historic Resources 1. Might any site or structure of historic significance be affected by the project? Yes No X Explanation and Source: There are no buildings of historic significance on or near the proposed site. Source: Mass. Historical Commission. 2. Might any archaeological site be affected by the project? Yes X No Explanation and Source: The Massachusetts Historical Commission archeological site number 19-ES-490 is partially on the project site. Source: Mass. Historical Commission. C. Ecological Effects 1. Might the project significantly affect fisheries or wildlife,especially any rare or endangered species? Yes No X Explanation and Source: The existing habitat for small animals and birds in a semi-urban environment will be somewhat reduced by this project. There are no significant waterbodies on the site that would be suitable for fishery production. There are no rare or endangered animal special in the area that would be affected by this project. Source: Roger Hogan, U.S. Fish h Game Service. P.5 2. Might the project significantly affect vegetation.especially any rare or endangered species of plant? Yes No X (Estimate approximate number of mature trees to be removed: ) Explanation and Source: Since the site is currently undeveloped, a certain amount of vegetation will be removed during development. It is The Fafard Companies' policy to retain as much existing vegetation as possible, especially large trees, for aesthetic and landscaping purposes. There are no known rare or endangered plant species in the area. Source: The Fafard Companies; Roger Hogan, U.S. Fish 6 Wildlife Service. 3. Might the project alter or affect Good hazard areas,inland or coastal wetlands(e.g.,estuaries,marshes,sand dunes and beaches,ponds,streams,rivers,fish runs,or shellfish beds)? Yes No X Explanation and Source: The project site does contain certain areas of inland wetlands. These areas have been mapped by the City of Salem. In several areas, Fafard has agreed to exchange land wanted by Salem for conservation purposes for other, less critical, parcels. Fafard has planned the project to minimize impacts on wetland areas. A drainage channel and retention pond are included in the site plan. Source: The Fafard Companies; Susan Madison, Salem Conservation Commission. 4. Might the project affect shoreline erosion or accretion at the project site, downstream or in nearby coastal areas? Yes No X ExVianation and Source: The project site is well inland and not near any major water bodies or waterways. There will be no affect on shoreline erosion or accretion. 5. Might the project involve other geologically unstable areas? Yes No X Explanation and Source: The U.S. Geological Survey places Salem, and most of Southern New England, in an area of seismic risk. The proposed site is no different from others in the region in this respect. Source: U.S. Geological Survey. D. Hazardous Substances 1. Might the project involve the use, transportation, storage, release, or disposal of potentially hazardous substances? Yes X No Explanation and Source During construction, a certain amount of blasting will be required. This will be done in compliance with all regulations governing such activities. During operation of the project, no use, storage, transportation, release or disposal of hazardous wastes are anticipated. Source: The Fafard Companies. P.6 E. Resource Conservation and Use 1. Might the project affect or eliminate land suitable for agricultural or forestry production? Yes No X (Describe any present agricultural land use and farm units affected.) Explanation and Source: The site is not suitable for agricultural or forestry production due poor soils and large expanses of ledge and bare bedrock. In addition, the site is surrounded by commercial uses which are incompatible with farming and forestry uses on the parcel. Source: Salem Conservation Commission. 2. Might the project directly affect the potential use or extraction of mineral or energy resources (e.g., oil, coal, sand&gravel,ores)? Yes No—X_ Explanation and Source. There are no energy or mineral resources on the site. Source: Salem Planning Department. 3. Might the operation of the project result in any increased consumption of energy? Yes X No Explanation and Source. The new buildings proposed will use natural gas for heating, hot water, and domestic cooking. In addition, electricity will be used in all buildings. All buildings will be constructed to minimize energy requirements. Residential units will include greenhouse windows on South facing units, and all units will be well insulated. Commercial and industrial buildings will also use passive solar heating where possible, and maximum insulation. Source: The Fafard Companies. F. Water Quality and Quantity 1. Might the project result in significant changes in drainage patterns? Yes No X Explanation and Source: The project is designed to fit the development to the land. Existing contours will be.maintained as much as possible. A drainage channel and retention pond will be included in the project to mitigate stormwater impacts, as well as to provide an aesthetic amenity. Since these features will follow existing land contours, drainage patterns will remain largely unchanged. Source: The Fafard Companies. 2. Might the project result in the introduction of pollutants into any of the following: (a) Marine Waters . .. . . .. . .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Yes No X (b) Surface Fresh Water Body .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes No X (c) Ground Water. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes No X Explain types and quantities of pollutants. All project drainage will enter the Salem municipal sewer system serving the site. This is a combined storm/sanitary sewer which serves the towns of Salem, Peabody, Danvers and Beverly. Sewage flows to the treatment plant in Salem. Here it receives primary treatment before it is discharged into the ocean. Source: Mr. Tony Fletcher, Salem City Engineer. P. 7 3. Will the project generate sanitary sewage? Yes X No If Yes,Quantity: 350,000 gallons per day Disposal by: (a) Onsite septic systems . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Yes No X (b) Public sewerage systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes X No (c) Other means(describe) There is more than adequate capacity to handle additional sewage demand. The treatment plant is about 6 million GPD below capacity. The Highland Park area was permitted for 1.3 million GPD of sewage flow about 10 years ago, but the permit was never fully used. Source: Mr. Tony Fletcher, Salem City Engineer. 4. Might the project result in an increase in paved or impervious surface over an aquifer recognized as an impor- tant present or future source of water supply? Yes No X Explanation and Source: The site is not an important aquifer or ground water supply. Source: Mr. Tony Fletcher, Salem City Engineer; Susan Madison, Salem Conservation Commission. 5. Is the project in the watershed of any surface water body used as a drinking water supply? Yes No_X_ Are there any public or private drinking water wells within a 1/2-mile radius of the proposed project? Yes X No Explanation and Source., There are no surface drinking water sources in the same watershed as the site. Thompson's Meadow, which is within 1/2-mile of the project, serves as a secondary water source for the Town of Marblehead. This source has never been used, although wells are installed. Source: Salem Conservation Commission. 6. Might the operation of the project result in any Increased consumption of water? Yes No Approximate consumption 350,00Ions per day.Ukely water source(s) Wenham Lake Explanation and Source: The City of Salem gets its water from Wenham Lake, which is fed by the Ipswich River. There is no shortage of water. Meeting the projected 350,000 GPD for the project should be no problem. Source: Tony Fletcher, Salem City Engineer. 7. Does the project involve any dredging? Yes No x If Yes,indicate: Quantity of material to be dredged Quality of material to be dredged Proposed method of dredging Proposed disposal sites Proposed season of year for dredging Explanation and Source: This project will not involve any dredging. Evacuation will be required to develop the retention pond. Source: The Fafard Companies. P. 8 G. Air Quality 1. Might the project affect the air quality in the project area or the immediately adjacent area? Yes No X Describe type and source of any pollution emission from the project site. No significant air quality impacts are expected as a result of this project. During construction, short—term fugitive dust emissions will be controlled with standard construction procedures. An increase in local traffic will result from the project, but traffic—related pollutants are not expected to create significant impacts to air quality in the vicinity. Source: HMM Associates. 2. Are there any sensitive receptors (e.g., hospitals, schools, residential areas) which would be affected by any pollution emissions caused by the project,including construction dust? Yes X No Explanation and Source: Salem High School is located at the corner of Highland Avenue and Willson Street. The Salem Hospital is located approximately 1/2 mile northeast of the project site on Highland Avenue. The project site abuts the Highland Park Golf Course. Source: HMM Associates. 3. Will access to the project area be primarily by automobile? Yes X No Describe any special provisions now planned for pedestrian access,carpooling,buses and other mass transit. Although access to the proposed project will be primarily by automobile, public transportation is available. MBTA Bus Route #450 runs on Highland Avenue between downtown Salem, through Lynn, and downtown Boston. Scheduled bus trips are made frequently on weekdays, and on a more limited basis on holidays and weekends. Source: Salem Planning Department. H. Noise 1. Might the project result in the generation of noise? Yes X No The proposed site consists mainly of rock ledge. A significant amount of drilling and blasting will be required during construction. No significant noise impacts are expected- once the project is completed. Traffic levels on Highland Avenue are already high, and the incremental project related traffic should not add noticeably to existing noise levels. Traffic passing through the golf course will be limited to passenger cars associated with the residential development. Peak noise associated with this traffic, assuming up to 20% of residents use this route during the peak hour, will be about 51 dBA. This should not present a significant impact. Source: HtV Associates. 2. Are there any sensitive receptors (e.g., hospitals, schools, residential areas) which would be affected by any noise caused by the project? Yes X No Explanation and Source: Salem High School is located at the corner of Highland Avenue and Willson Street. The Salem Hospital is located approximately 1/2 mile northeast of the project site on Highland Avenue. The project abuts, and traverses, the Highland Park Golf Course. Source: HMM Associates. P.9 1. - Solid Waste 1. Might the project generate solid waste? Yes_X No Explanation and Source. (Estimate types and approximate amounts of waste materials generated, e.g., industrial, domestic, hospital, sewage sludge,construction debris from demolished structures.) During construction, some solid waste will be generated from earth work. This will be limited as much as possible. No buildings will be demolished. During operation, industrial, commercial and residential wastes will be generated. It is anticipated that trash will be collected by the City of Salem on major routes through the project, and by private contractors on private ways. Source: The Fafard Companies. J. Aesthetics 1. Might the project cause a change in the visual character of the project area or its environs? Yes X No The project site is currently undeveloped. Thus, the new development will alter the visual character of the land. However, the change should not be negative. The project calls for fitting the development to the land. Trees and other vegetation will be maintained as much as possible. The project will not alter the character of the site's environs, which are largely developed for industrial, commercial and residential uses. Source: The Fafard Companies. 2. Are there any proposed structures which might be considered incompatible with existing adjacent structures In the vicinity in terms of size,physical proportion and scale,or significant differences in land use? Yes No_X Explanation and Source: The proposed project is the same scale and land—use as the surrounding area. Source: The Fafard Companies; HMM Associates. 3. Might the project impair visual access to waterfront or other scenic areas? Yes No 'z Explanation and Source: There are no scenic views which would be impaired by this project. Source: HMM Associates. K. Wind and Shadow 1. Might the project cause wind and shadow impacts on adjacent properties? Yes No X Explanation and Source: Building heights in this project are generally 3 stories or so. Buildings will be shorter than trees. There are no wind or shadow impacts expected as a result of this project. Source: HMM Associates. P. 10 N. CONSISTENCY WITH PRESENT PLANNING A. Describe any known conflicts or Inconsistencies with current federal, state and local land use, transportation, open space,recreation and environmental plans and policies.Consult with local or regional planning authorities where appropriate. There are no known conflicts between the proposed project and local plans for the area. The Fafard Companies have consulted with the Salem Planning Board, Conservation Commission, Park Commission, and Department of Public Works. Members of these agencies are working with Fafard to obtain state funds and transfer land to facilitate the project. It is expected that environmental issues associated with transportation, wetlands and recreational uses can be satisfactorily addressed through project planning. Source: The Fafard Companies. V. FINDINGS AND CERTIFICATION A. The notice of intent to file this form has been/will be published in the following newspaper(s): (Name) Salem Evening News (Date) November 24, 1982 B. This form has been circulated to all agencies and persons as required by Appendix B. ZZ you SZ f V.Y. Date Signature of Responsible Officer or Project Proponent TrA.0—Amm Co`-b . z Name(print or type) ' Zorn rcuteTT ^�. Address G\`L• 159t- l600 Telephone Number C�Z- • M E'I to Signatu a of person preparing ENF Of different from above) Margaret B. Briggs Name(print or type) HMM Associates, Inc. Address 255 Bear Hill Rd. Waltham, MA Telephone Number 890-6933 Note #1 AM and PM traffic counts were taken at the intersection of Marlboro Street and Highland Avenue on November 17 and 18, 1982. The peak hour of traffic is from 4:30 to 5:30 PM, when a total of 2,681 vehicles pass through this intersection. The increase due to the project has been roughly estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and conservatively assuming that 100% of commercial and industrial users, and 50% of residents, use this intersection. U �4 ppj z�fN " _ r See 003lgh Tnleq � 41,Pol i J.Alv// 61 qn, "A aml We �i17'7 E4iff M — rfjls MI'va M ne Deny Wharf ph I Lt J • Long F XIf /11 ip, Playgr and �v J) C he 4 V almer t z S" LJ) z For :Zio-1,441 a A% 3j, EM �U( J)1. 'Al� omps" aadow 4YLe B KEY o Site boundaries red e' Co Y Proposed roadways 'so C Commercial area Industrial area F 3 R Residential area ............... 91 32 a �y,�a,9y�'y ,'ty�,, " .'F ',�at4-' � + +•` �' • '"�"Pj 't • lw„ `� d 'a t' `+ g e 4•'�Y ;'..�'ia :. -per� ,� i3�yw� , sr� A atx� ,p��W fi•y �•B'Y„ 'QA F�* i h # �eNZ , h. y�t` ° ,,yy21 d Y r'�}. `@ r •hk E Va yk� S ,i ' o�,,Yt�j } {:^+if'i> r • q ' "A XT^9ik �Y* %,iyda4 . : �' ' 'Se9 Y r r41', a,. '.!`"_,�r*^m • t,�T: r4. PIK Ta'4p lj.,q' rI ii,i ,�"� 4 �q E a'.l''>�'i '.i"• FdJ +' • ki. " �q � ,u'T a �s ys�•.� .�; .. i A 4 rip t f R'^ty3 ib �'ROJECT � 1 T "c`r'i7 y ra Ac .tmx �r tea '',F5 �,.x : p ~t i fit{, pgsr�ra+P� �,ptca[ �� }&tyfyr� ,$F.y�a�^ ��,an},t+tpP&eyp*�t'�ffi f}��`t�4+� �T_''ii� r 4 l �QN1`rit VAVn,, VLJ h'4 ;ft. �7' IND WF'S3' 4BGRf+,JkP,..7!,fEl.�"�. D `7 r 3' kf c n i ar h•a 4, '�iM r xA a a.. � rye- y.4 f 4 l«" r A¢. a3.b� {P.F.a It ♦ �k+H�a+ �* � �f m'�iT$a}`F.'FL as .r7� b�i.,�Jii i,�,mT�' {��1rsg, Y r errf "€ � �a `.�� k r� r""# i� i•,�:. {r i- 4 t�� br" °� � s s7'k � +-�� r r ^. � `Y V-Ori 'k ` x�,r`t0 ti� hi r qr. `arw "4T to 3 f � �� 163 "'•"� !r'�FM .. r F' + `• rN ' p ' {ti• i �Y �`f 'y$Frc•^�p,r p'1 T ,, i�_r:� ��' } 4 ,!L'�i� 8r• k` t gV "+ . tT rg' 2 ,� r i + p Ex° a k.�,� Y[�yy§e�r .Ti�:��,j(��` � Sir i_Y 3 M i "•y (tPt 1=.. d R4`. 'irAr f..e:jll r i. �{ � :,'r 'r' '6tS 4� tsEx s J ,ort l T S a 13..a ;� (spy s� '"�'� �� *� a `� a.aa1. yy,�� t sa•3rr�' ��1° ' }} '�"; rrixi r"r'� m° >: 54{ {yak 't f'r E`'r`V N Rik M Y x!4 fu .c 9 �x er "• r { .TNE COMMC>fJWEA`LTH t)F MASS6� HUSETTS � ,iF-l " k 'Ai eA ri� '�' *.5 � � q r ' ?k� E�PARTAi OT-0P.t OUBLtC (WORKS", ", a r;-1 � it y, n.h'R '',. 3d$ i• r �6 rrkTr �3 to +:i' r� . a� ��tn.,. '.6 (j 1d'"` N�'s4 rTfi6C+4 9 a" sIn Cooperation Wtthjhe q }]E' t�•a r r{ ,� ate.,a.a .1{�"'F"Yf' r A �s�"h3�•�'hy�,� ��a4.h ? ° y,' • t U S r ,DEAARTME , li� 7tZd�il�lS (�RTATtOt�l D.yf+i¢�AL`6'1 HYtC'� ..+ `' h y3P4Y'AeFft TR'4TjgQ -f'q4 ; ukt ( 'aMk.+ )W. W --v �,.> w a . qlt"hf'"*L�, 't F1nfp^R✓?uc i 'ir"iaytiy :P,M ?°y�t •',w,tyiy a r11Yaj�t + �6 , r „ t't,�+y , a 'qa., 5 5 t < , 1 S'S� .r " —' M i- •�" v -1 k '� R.'a "la r '�'�eY, �' �.l .. fir' S/L. ��" �•�. � .pr�ryeey� e'�'r h' i9 Aa "a;�Ys'' a A"" dq ,ar� � , y"•` F.Ni Z 'rh ,r 'fS' r [ k1.r��ip'}"� y., , k+a r gs `Aib'.r r3• ^q r '�"nh#', .q g �''w,'dJk� sg;r �i" •�. : a tv�y40 V;,A Prolpored by 'p d♦ r4 V'r.. n i, �� t �Lalofieti Povto ( n�pneering Co,. :j _ t _, } ,� vl . %oitofls Ma'swchusetts 02116 ,t , � "t• � q � .�a wa " -'#yVT'.yy 444, T} t r +i *A��rkk �r �"� 4,� fl" 71} WX ' N 4 ♦4 ,'{W �, Ei4 F '; a ?. .�'.?. q SYa# -Y iv A'� � q ��yy..,. w gyp, ( r'47""j �.. R :.:' 9''��'G, IIR• ' a Y' ; '''A r �'t -ej�" • ,..� ' r �r- TOPICS PROJECT REPORT PART I HIGHLAND AVENUE AT SWAMPSCOTT AND MARLBOROUGH ROADS SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS AREA NO. 2 Prepared for: THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In Cooperation With The U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MARCH - 1972 : Prepared b P Y E. Lionel Pavia Engineering Co., Inc. 80 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts 02116 E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.. INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 1 . General 2 2. Highland Avenue at Swampscott Road 2 3. Highland Avenue at Marlborough Road 2 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 4 1 . General 4 2. Highland Avenue at Swampscott Road 4 3. Highland Avenue at Marlborough Road 4 COST ESTIMATE 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 7 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure I - Project Location Accident Summary for 1970 Highland Avenue at Swampscott Road Highland Avenue at Marlborough Road Drawing No P2-1 Highland Avenue at Swampscott and Marlborough Roads E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.. INC. INTRODUCTION The Highland Avenue Early Start Project covers TOPICS improvements on Highland Avenue and Boston Street in the City of Salem . The limits of the project are shown on Figure 1 . The project includes Highland Avenue from the Salem - Lynn line to the intersection with Boston and Essex Streets and then Boston Street from there to the Salem - Peabody line. The area covered by the Early Start Project Report is separated into several parts which will be presented for review independently. The final part will summarize the entire project and make recommendations for system interconnection and overall coordination of the project. Highland Avenue (Route 107) and Boston Street are important arterials connecting Salem with Lynn and Peabody, respectively. Essex Street connects both of these arterials with the Salem downtown area. Highland Avenue (FAP 41) and Boston Street (FAP 55) are on the Federal Aid Primary System, while Swampscott Road, Marlborough Road, Willson Street, Dalton Parkway, Jackson Street, Essex Street, Bridge Street and Goodhue Street are on the TOPICS Primary Type II Network. High volumes, high speeds, uncontrolled turning movements, roor visibility, poor signingnin 9 and other related problems combine to create accident hazards and pedestrian dangers. It is the purpose of the Project Report to recommend specific improvements to alleviate these problems. Part I, as presented herein, covers Highland Avenue from about 500 feet south of Swampscott Road to about 500 feet north of Marlborough Road. This section has been recommended for early consideration by the Salem representatives. The program is recommended for immediate implementation subject to review and approval by the City of Salem, the Massachusetts Department of Public Works and the Federal Highway Administration. -1- E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.. INC. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The assistance of many individuals in the City of Salem, the Massachusetts Department of Public Works, the M.B.T.A. and several other agencies has been of great value in compiling data and formulating recommendations for this report. Their help and assistance is gratefully acknowledged. This Project Report is being prepared and distributed as part of the continuing transportation planning process in the Commonwealth by the Massachusetts Department of Public Works. ii Gnu . A / P PE�DY.' --- e _.. is„—,F-:.;� '"�.[, .,,♦, . ,.[,[ I\ Z` - 3 'IA�µ,9 .. 31 .a • F rq �g zc a 0 , 0 0 900 1800 ?tC0 fEEt PART A. NO RT N W Ir - Uoos o�oo r �Q N � H/GHL AND \UE- 1 o. in � ��oo°®off� �� p�-,�,o�• � ��o��--;' SA E / NEC Y / •� r\\\o.( c E4\JV(riG U I E ~ o dl r r x N aO 4 oOA�I. c d [ n I a,�oy R• �` o •'i JUNIPER IS 17, E7 POINT F THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SALEM, MASS. ,. HIGHLAND AVENUE-BOSTON STREET 44_ MA fH_,,,_/ EARLY START PROJECT Eqp. LOCATION..MAP h E.lIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO, INC. SCALE AS SHOWN ISO RnVI cTON <TRFFT GATEMARCH.1972. i O��i2'GQ.d�CZ ' 4z M44je 6AV 0/ ANTHONY D. CORTESE, Sc. D. one Xm&x J&eet 1B06&n 02;(08 Commissioner OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, 9TH FLOOR, TELEPHONE 292-5568 June 1, 198 �FzE ��gea Gerard A. McNeil gP�� Fafard Companies 290 Eliot Street Ashland , Massachusetts 01721 RE: SALEM Wetlands File #64-92 (Gerard McNeil) Docket #84-27 Dear Mr. McNeil : In response to your request for an adjudicatory hearing dated May 10, 1984 please be advised that a conference has been scheduled to discuss the above-referenced matter. No work shall take place on the subject site pending the issuance of a final order by this Department . The conference will be held at the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, 5th floor, One Winter Street ("The Corner Mall" ) , Boston, MA, on Tuesday, June 12, 1984 at 10:00 AM Specifically, the conference is intended to clarify the issues to be contested at an adjudicatory hearing or, alternatively , to resolve those issues without a formal hearing. Please come prepared to state clearly and concisely the facts upon which your request is based and the relief which you are seek- ing through the hearing process . Failure of a party to be present , or failure to specify sufficient contentions to warrant a formal hearing, may result in a dismissal of that party ' s claim. All parties should also be prepared to state in a general way the nature of the evidence and the witnesses which they intend to produce at the hearing. — -2- in it is impossible for you to attend this meeting at the anova-designated time , please contact Suzanne Carnevale, Docket Cler_: for this matter, at 292-5565. Sincerely , Barry P. IFogel Deputy General Co nsel BPF/kas cc : Dale E. Yale - Salem Conservation Commission Mr. George Humann, Jr. John R. Serafini , Esq. Mr . Philip DiPietro - Northeast Region, DEQE Kathryn Walsh , Esq . Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearin The following information is set forth pursuant to DEQE's Rules for Adjudicatory Proceedings, 310 CMR 1.01(6) : (1) DEQE Wetland File Number 64-92 Applicant - Gerard McNeil , Fafard Companies, 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 01721 Project Location - Highland Avenue, Wilson Street, Swampscott Road and First Street (2) Party filing request - Fafard Companies, 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 01721 Paul Beattie, Esquire, 290 Eliot Street, 879-7300 (3) Other parties:* George Humann, Jr. , Purity Supreme, 312 Boston Road, North Billerica, MA 01862 Dale Yale, Conservation Commission, City Hall , Salem, MA 01970 Fafard Companies, John R. Serafini , Esquire, 63 Federal Street, Salem, MA 01970 (4) By this document, a formal adjudicatory hearing is hereby requested (5) Objections to the Superseding Order are as follows A. We object to the project being deemed regulatable under the 4/1/83 regulations. B. We object to Purity Supreme' s appeal being deemed valid. (6) The facts upon which the request for hearing is based are as follows: We are of the opinion that the project is governed by the old Wetlands Protection Act Regulations. The Notice of Intent which we were required to send by April 1, 1983, was mailed in a timely manner to the appropriate parties, on two occassions. First, it was sent from this office by certified-mail on March 25 , 1983 to both DEQE and the Salem Conservation Commission. As the DEQE notice went to the State rather than the Regional office, a delay was involved. Nonetheless, the Notice was sent nearly a week ahead of time. Additionally, Attorney John Serafini filed a Notice of Intent on our behalf, in proper form, to both DEQE and the Conservation Commission. Both of these were received before the end of March , 1983. *William A. Krol , DEQE, 323 New Boston Street, Woburn, MA 01801 It is thus our opinion that as a result of either of the above mentioned situations, the requirements for having the project regu- lated by the old regulations, (sending a Notice of Intent to the appropriate parties by April 1, 1983) have been met. Our second contention is that Purity Supreme had no standing (as • defined at the conclusion of the Order of Conditions) to appeal the Order of Conditions. Purity is clearly not the applicant, the owner or ten residents. Purity cannot be an aggrieved person because the nearest wetlands covered by the Order are more than a quarter mile from their nearest interest. From such a distance Purity cannot be affected by our use of ,the wetlands. Finally, Purity is not the owner of abutting land, as their nearest interest to the area in question is a store in which they are lessees. To have standing they are required to be the owner of abutting land. This test has not been met. Even if Purity was a proper party to appeal the Order, procedural defects should render it void. In filing the appeal they were required to simultaneously send copies of said appeal to both the Conservation Commission and the applicant by certified mail - To this day this remains to be done, making it impossible for us to appeal their appeal . Due to the lack of Purity's standing and the procedural defects involved, Purity' s appeal should not be considered. (7) Changes sought in the Superseding Order are as follows: A. Recognize that the Notice of Intent was filed in a timely fashion, resulting in the project being regulated by the terms of the old act. B. Allow for filling of wetlands necessary to construct First Street, Traders Way and the proposed loop road within the residential area. C. Allow for filling up to 5,000 square feet of existing wetlands in the proposed residential area with a compensatory storage area. D. Allow for the construction of a control structure on the adjacent city owned land, as shown in the application, and for any other required structure to provide for necessary retention areas. (8) On Friday, May 4, 1984 an informational meeting was held with the head of our engineering department, DEQE and DEQE engineers for the purpose of discussing differences existing at that time. Progress was made, leading us all to believe that the differences could be resolved. Consequently, if a pre-hearing conference could be arranged at the earliest possible convenience of the hearing officer, we could attempt to resolve any remaining differences, thus avoiding the adjudicatory process. (9) A copy of this request is concurrently beinq sent to the Salem Conservation Commission, Atty. John Serafini , Purity Supreme, and DEQE. THE FAFARD COMPANIES By: Date Gerard McNeil , Manager— Engineering and Planning 11.ttu of c Mlem, C tt�Sttrhu�e##� SM `sIttnnin� 1attrD (Jnr �ialrm Grern JAN 22 1 26 PH IS CERTIFICATE OF ACTIO111LE 4 i TO: Josephine R. Fusco, City Clerk CITYCL£F5.. GQLEM.MASS. FROM: Salem Planning Board Re: Special Permit for Planned Unit Development--The Fafard Co. , Inc. Two parcels on First Street, Salem DATE: January 22, 1985 I hereby certify that , pursuant to Section VII-O of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, the Salem Planning Board has taken the following action with respect to the above.-referenced application: On Thursday, January 17, 1985, at a regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board, the Board voted, by unanimous vote, to approve the application .for a Special Permit under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for a Planned Unit Development. Notice of the Planning Board's action and the reasons supporting it are more fully described in the attached copy of the Special Permit decision the original of which was sent to the applicant by registered mail, at the address stated on the application. ^� Walter B. Power, III �t Chairman dey A«r" Ti#u of Atte ��alrm Guru + CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD IN RE: APPLICATION OF THE FAFARD COMPANIES FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT UNDER SECTION VII-0 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SALEM DECISION This decision is rendered upon an application for a special permit for a Planned Unit Development pursuant to Section VII-0 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem (the "Ordinance"). The application was , submitted on December 6, 1984, by The Fafard Companies, which include H.A. Fafard and Sons Construction, Inc. , Ledgemere Land Corporation and Fafard Real Estate (collectively,"Fafard") together with a site plan entitled "Site Plan of Land of Parcel 1" and Site Plan of Parcel 2", both in Salem, MA. dated September, 1984, and revised November 15, 1984,prepared and stamped by William McDonough, #31739, and an Environmental Impact Statement as required by Section VII-0 4 of the Ordinance. The Board, within seven days after receipt of the application transmitted a copy of the application and plans to the Inspector of Buildings, the City Engineer, the Board of Health and the Conservation Commission. Notice of the filing of the application was also given to the City Clerk. Notice of the Public Hearing by the Board on this application was duly published in the Salem Evening News on December 13, 1984, and December 20, 1984, and duly mailed to all persons entitled thereto by law. e A public hearing on the application was held in accordance with such notice at 7:30 p.m. , on January 3, 1985, in the second floor hearing room at One Salem Green in Salem. The following members of the Board were present at the hearing: Walter Power, III, Abby Burns, Donald Hunt, John Ahern, Robert Guethlen, Normand Houle, and Edward Stevenson. Reports on the Application were received from the following Boards and Officers on the dates set forth below: 1. Inspector of Buildings--December 15, 1984 2. City Engineer--Commented orally 3. Board of Health--January 10, 1985 4. Conservation Commission--Covered by Order of Conditions issued by Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (#64-92) dated October 4, 1984, and letter in response to request for comments under Wetlands Special Permit dated October 12, 1984. -Z- The Board has made a thorough study of and has given full consideration to all documents, plans and other materials submitted by Fafard; the reports, written or otherwise, of the Inspector of Buildings; the City Engineer; the Board of Health and the Conservation Commission and all statements made and other materials submitted at the Public Hearing and at other public meetings of the Board at which the Application was discussed. The date so considered includes, but is not limited to, the items listed in Addendum A attached, which items are specifically incorporated in and made a part of this decision and which need not be recorded as a part hereof. The Board is satisfied that such date is sufficient the meet the requirements of Section' VII-0 of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the Board has unanimously voted to grant a Special Permit for a Planned Unit Development pursuant to Fafard's Application upon and in accordance with the provisions, conditions and procedures set forth below: 1. Based upon the written material submitted to the Board as well as oral communications received at the Public Hearing and other public meetings of the Board, the Board makes the following findings: a. The Planned Unit Development has been designed with various types of land uses which can be combined in a compatible relationship with each other as a totally planned development. b. The design of the Planned Unit Development is compatible with the existing or potential development of the surrounding neighborhood in that Fafard proposes commercial/residential uses for the property adjacent c. A plan for the total property has been submitted to the Board which clearly details the manner in which the subject area is to be developed and the compatibility of the development with the existing or potential development of means that will be employed to protect the abutting property and the health, safety, welfare and privacy enjoyed thereon in accordance with the requirements of Section VII—O 3.b of the Ordinance. d. The proposed development plan meets all requirements of the Ordinance for maximum bulk, yards, parking and loading requirements, and height limitations. e. The proposed Planned Unit Development plan has demonstrated that lot frontage and lot sizes are compatible with the surrounding area and meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. f. The Planned Unit Development is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Ordinance and the Master Plan of the City of Salem and will promote the purposes of Section VII—O of the Ordinance as set forth in Subsection 2 thereof. l -3- g. The Planned Unit Development will not result in a net negative environmental impact. h. The parcel containing the Planned Unit Development contains more thail' sixty thousand (60,('x00) square feet. 2. The Special Permit and the exercise of the rights granted hereunder shall be subject to the following conditions: a. ,Work shall conform to plans entitiled, "Site Plan of Land of Parcel 1" and "Site Plan of Land of Parcel 2", dated September, 1984 and revised January 17, 1985, prepared by William T. McDonough, #31739. Plans for these parcels include a landscaping plan, lighting plan, and snow storage plan, all approved by the Planning Board on January 17, 1985. b. No building within the Planned Unit Development shall exceed 3-1/2 stories in height. C. Removal of rubbish and other' refuse generated within the Planned Unit Development shall be the responsibility of the governing association of the development. Such responsibility shall be recorded with the deeds of the property owners and shall run with the land. d. Except as specifically modified by this permit, all zoning requirements shall apply to the Planned Unit Development area. e. A Certificate of Compliance or approval signed by a majority of the members of the Planning Board shall constitute conclusive evidence of the matters set forth therein if and when recorded with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds. f. Upon the request of Fafard, and after public hearing held in accordance with the requirements of Section VII—O of the Ordinance, any provision of this Special Permit may be waived or amended by a majority vote of the Board. g. This Special Permit granted hereunder shall lapse within two years if a substantial use thereof has not sooner commenced except for good cause, or if construction has not begun by such date except for good cause. h. If Fafard or its successors or assigns shall make any use of the Planned Unit Development other than as set forth herein, the Board, after notice to Fafard and hearing, may revoke this permit for all buildings for which a Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued and all land within the Planned Unit Development which has not yet been built upon. DATE: " January 21, 1985 Members of the Planning Board . -� ------ I � � I - - I - .. - .-- - ----- � . -- - - -� --� -- � %1-- 1� I ,, , . ,,� , . � , - -- - - - - - � - ------- - 7--�, --'-- - .1-,r -z� ,-�w, ,��-� - - -. .. -� -- -,- ,-- .1r, ,� . -- ---- -I � - -- , - - ,. �.. .-- . - � . - - - �-- . � - � - - - ��- . , - - - � I . - -7010" � - . � I . :4 - . I I � � '. .�, , , , * --!'-- ". , : W� - ,a ,-' I I , I � . -w - . �. . ,I �,� I - - �1;,�-'��. j , -- -, � I - - - I I - �11-'-- ��l -,�� . I.--. 4 , 1-A "r 1�,,, *,,� ..!, J_ . ',�.-- , - . �4 1 1 1 1 1 " -I a, , I - a- -1 . I . � � ,� .1, . %I . - 11 . ., ,- , ., � I - - a � - :�l I.-Zd ON , 1 1 � I. ��, �,-,� -i�L '� %,;�A;-Pll �� - �,- . -- . , " -1- 1 � - 4, 4, - - � - � � . , . -� I - A � - 1 - - - - 1-1 . - , . I �- � . I A l , I, - I q-, , ,� �- 1` _1. �,J , Y - ,7 I'l- , t-1 11 �, -k _-,-!�, , 4 � k,� - . I , I' I a -- - . - � - - - A- op v -I . I , - -1 a .- . - I - , - I -� -1i'. 1-1 ---, - - . . � 11 I , To, j�-.- I - � � � . 11 a I I - --- . I 0 , �! - ,. 4" q a er - . - �� . I 4� - .ep A I - �� j I 1- - , -A-1 -1. . - I 1'. , �.. j, - � , . 1, I � -�� - - a �, � � , I ! m. -M --!, i7 I�, , !f.!7. ! . r, I I I -�� I'll I �Iw -, -.., . c -1. , , , . .1 . . � � I . I .1 a -Ir - 7 :, - - �*"Stai*�voito �� - � � , . ,I � - , , , � . � � %-, , � �� I I �;v . � �'. � I . I � I - I . Z . - " I � ," ., I - I . I I �',I � , � � I , , 0 � . - � , . I -- �� . �L:� � -� � 4 � .; . - I .9 -;"I ., , , j�, 7 1 . I � I , 1� I " � .. - 11 . � � � I I . I . �, - , 4 .4 -L", ok � ... ' ' I - - - � I , t Tl-�/ �� I i' � . " , � ., I . . - -- � 1 ��1-707' 1 - . , 1 6 .. -F,,,, " --� -- ,- I- I I I . �, -I- , : I I I � �; , � " !- i - _xws "Olt Z?� I a �P` , s, 7,, v . a - � -1 - 4 4� - 11 , 4, , oa I - , I 11 - . . ,oa - . - , , xm �7 V -� e-� , I q � � I . . I 11 - - .� . w- ,%� �, ,* - - 1, I -1 - " - - '- 'f ... . , * I - � I .a- . � , . I v -.�;,, , ., I I I . . . I- �'IiW.l * - f � - m - - .. , I, .1 , - � - � I k I...,,* , , - , ,.- � I I � , , � - I , - �a . .-I 1� .t I %*"Vb 1Awi*x1ooim �nw vVecivil ".- ".,11� I l" -, , , a I I . e;� " I I. . , " , -. . - . ---f--U*� I I �� ' . - a . , r , I -l'- I I I - .� . - .. � I .1 'i�, I . I - . �. 11� � I ., p a %1. - - - � .f , , I I 1 4V-47 :�- or v � 1 Ox" ,?�,f I, , I - A � I ,I f Z* 6 ,�;4 -o- � I L I -, ., I ; o Ik T -, a .11 --1 . - � - � I $ . . .. � iA� �,*,. . � �� % -- - f A , .f '� �� -1 . I , I I .. - - . � ...-- - -, � I � �& - � i-, . . . a- - I 'I, 'a �"--7N I, , � I . I � , - I , 11 - I 4 � 11 .4I a 1�1 I J- e. " ,11 ., r , 7 . , ". : ,� . , � I . I I I I ,- -1.er - -1�1 - -k, - -.1-4. � , V ,- - , - - I , ,, , - . I . , I � IN - -1 - 1101 � I � . , � 11 ,., I I �,� � ,` . . A . . x I I � I 4 . , � I -k6 -- , - I -.,� � , 11 I, - 1, � � , � �". . � � - , -- I . - , - , , � , .� � .� 4 4 , ,,, � .. "I I -- - �� 11 - . 1 -- I . I - I , I � ,V, ,±�, I . .� v ,,, - �, . .,.-. I ' I f;A2 -r4 ---I:- - . . I I i I I ., - 1. -, , a . = RNM% - - - f"4' 4 "'' 4�� " ' .. - I . k,- 6040 7a, -� � � r '.- -� 4 - . �Y11 OW�� - A, ,, ,I-- A *, .� :zp a �1 t , , , , . -�. I � I � - $( - ." slww �- ,* ,��, f " .- �, �-�f :" - I � .=7i,,�,, -1 - . � � ,.f - , ."--a ,�. --I I . a , ��'Pty i,pref, , a ,�,-�:,. z- I i- I �, i. � V ', r. - V" 11 �f , I V, ;�* ! , ---. '4 �� - -� t - �, - -. -'t - , - �;�� , � I I , Appolm ��Y'�" ,CL-`lj� � ,,,, , I I . � . . %, S � 4K.a I I 4t- -1 a , , � � - - . � t,l,, ,z � ,� I � - .. , * �� . . : I t � . I w .. ��, . , _. . I - I �I , - � I . -. I- . ., , I � I � - 7-.1 - r ,% ,� , , , -i-1 aaa -- , . -��. � 4 . -V -, - I",- �v , -,�. , ., " . I t - : I I ��.,- I - I -,a . 7,- � , - -, .. .1 -1.1-11 - - -1 - � - - *S10 o v - " ,,- " . " - -I .,.- �,I,,--,-+. , , � , � - - - -1`5 I � I I . �e - I - � a I . 0 o� !� �, ,4-imwy ,� '. t " . I . aa . t- I �L4 ,4,; � ; - , f . . I 1� I I � I � I I 4 , � , �! r I I a ,I o ; � ' " a 4-.,r, ". ,�,)� ,� . . - _7 4 . ;-_ � I f `l� , . a4 I . r 7) -� 41 � I - -� 4 ,,, -�. - , , � 11 . - ,..�l , 1�1. � - A� �, a I - . - . - � , . . .. � . . 41, Z. . 'r � _,,;, , , � , Z� ., 4 - - - - - , . - - . " 1 . 'r N a - 'L , 0 Z� - - . � t ., . � - � "j, k; - ral I � I � � I , � " -,�i,-. ?�- - -.,�-�- , - .1 , -.1 I - "I I . & I �, 11 - , � . I , '10' . � . - - , , , � I - " - _l, :� � - - I .1 7 . . 0 - . I 0 . � - �'� -4--.t f- �� a , � � I - K �. t- , ,- I Ao�, ��, ,j I -008 11�1, I , , I j:W I - , � "a . 4 , - -�,�, ,� .1 , - I I �; I ,�-. ; . . li , , , I cm, i i '. . .1 � ,V, � - c �.; '!,-i � ,4 ,� --- � . . * ". 0 �?4 F . - , � . '! , - - - . .I - - � � I", ,�, --- I I , - I 'I � 11 . ,� " .. -, rf 1 4 . -, ��, I " - - �, ,--. .1, . . , h � -&, -k�.'N�e I I �L , : � , -, '. ,- , I � -7 . � . �� ft.�"; - , � , � , � . , . . 4: 1 - I - - . - � - - 7 xp - , -e - A-�,-IT 1: I z v ake 1, - , , I aAe-.o� � . -7 ( Ii� �.'� � - � w ;�� I ,; � - -� r -' �. - -1 � , L, . 1,4- 1 ; - -� l� , I I i . .1� ' ii- ,. I I -i -. ,6 � � , I a I -t - I Z'1. % ; , . f� .--- I I - - I ; ,,t� , � -1;1 �� a c '14, � � . , , " ��, , a 4 v � 4 1. , , I . I -1 r , -. I � I � I . . -, 1. I I,I Y , ?, . ., -,�.% � pa, - , � " . . I , , ,� � , - - I 1A N, , , � , �- -4 �� p -1 I I , ,�'O . a - . . . I , ) ��.. �1�1 , 0 � � a � It . -,',"% %, -1 c ,.-, / I , 'i �x i T I -� I , , , 1w 1§ I., . .Lvr 4PT"?M I jd lot", 11-� "" 4 � , 4 �. . 1 Al .� � � � ,,� " al*A�, 1� � � I .�� I � � I ---� . - - : . - 4 1 . a - , , � a I � ,��, I , - --� 1: 7 -Ato- A --C� I- � - . ll - � - -- -�- - . � I � -e7?-. 1 - � . I % I !, , , - -,�K - i � , - . .-� � - . - .I AF-0 . ��7`v � .-- ,* - , - �.��, -� I .1 V , � t -, , � � �-� " 9 --,- 'c'. - llk .".. . .. . I * I .1�, . I � . �',-, , �A, , . , . ,�7,fn � I . � � 1� I oi� - ^ , I - . I I I -,N . . .14:� " -4 . I - I 11. 4' 'j , --- . "', - I , - �,* ,�,. --- - ,I I � . , a-� � , --,. �-71� 1 � I -J., '-4 I, - 1 . - � � I ,� 1N-f- I I - , . . I a � I , f� ; r-1 1, I . ip--, ,. -t-- � . a ., ,Iur.' .. . C- ,q I � 1�,q T-- I I I I I I I ��, I I .0� � $74 ,(Iti t ' �7-7?�,'- . , 114; IL I I -- a I I . . , Ir I - � ,',� ' k l� - I f A I I , � 1 1 ilz� , - . , . 4 . �, , ,�,., . ,� I , -� � I , I �t- . I I . - F " , I- �,d ,".10 - -I�- ��. - I. ON -V- 171� , I I �-, 'r, ,, . i, . . , , , I , . , " , , '-1-f - - ,,�� I � .' - I I , a - - . � r . 1, � � . I �. I I A -,,-. - ;", , I � -1 m --,141, ,7; . -, , �� , "t- -t 'I I o-q't - I r I � a � ,�.- . I . I �.. , - Ale - 1. . � I - 'r " , I I � � -1 "'.� I .1 .1 � --" , � �', ,, �jj-* . . � 1 4., , Y Pv�' � ji-�c r -, n, � , I . I ,�p'"'r11A*QA14='-JF" �L' i , !'- , c w 4, j *$�� - - , I � " ctw.cr . 447i I �., ,?A, - " N"" � '- I -- -,-,. ,I?o a I 0 . � � . -7 a "O��,- lo� , W�1%�,0!6 --7-,,�- �v, X' '41. - 1. * .L L a .; - . .� , ': � �,��5rlzf !�Vr-k ,,, 4 ,4 1, ,p*t� -"T " ;t � , 1� I .'It i. fc 1� ,r'A , . - -� � I * � c ,; - : ; '. - �r I - ?I �, 4, a j A N if ,�, ,It * , t - , j4-' - , - . , < IN �� ., I ", ; . � , ,, , -- -1 " k* ,� -,- r � %1� . , � -P *i cei " t I . . t ., � . 'aa, I so.I i 46, i�� I 1, ,v I i� -7 �p- - I I�� " ,I 7 � � .1*" a I I a � .�� .,� , .",-- � :�4 . - t , � , . - --a , , � - I , � � It. � �; , � , � ., t, � . , �� I , - - ;- --- -, , L " . - - � �N " I--"�Ia - � , . V, , ., 3 . , . � . I i 4 ,". , � - ', r- �. 1 7. - , , ,,-'7 ik �to V ,u ,ik . , . .. " � A� 4 � � I- . 7t - � � 1- , - * , I V -, A I .� - -- , - �- :, 1 *4 - ," , " A" , - -0,� - � -,� vi i P, , I . - - -I -- - , ;!�; . . - . - - - I a If - : , -t, � ."". . , - 41 , �, . . il � � T � k. 2; , � It .� - - - �cl-I ,, -t � - � e I !� k, -A7 � . - - ,N I i . � - I I ) � I �,�, w � �-41wy�f a � , . � A. , � .I , , .- T'. --,� - j � , ., I , � �, , - t . r , a I � , �, � a I � - I - ."T � � � ,� -., - I � , . * I t �--, ? � ', " � ;if �, � ..� -�; �� .- � '� �-� -�j �� . ", - . aa a .-lr,4�- I 1. - - , I -,,�, . � . . . -,, � a. *-,,t1vk1f I I I + � � 1.1N ? a . I . - 14 . - ( ", ," , � .. - /�, %4;4.7- 7 ,�- � -A �-?- *f - L�, W,. � 4e �,�f, � �, � L 1%. .- , - .ff,?, , lv� . ,%! , � . , I .. . - . 41 : 7� 1 . . , *� --� -;, I . I � NX I I 1 j-,f -41� - - - - - ,P " , � , , ,�.,,� , , � - �. �L . , , I� � '. 4 . L. - I -,� -" le 7r,4W - f. � - �.. -- � - - I . , . I -" I I 11 , - . - ,� I ,:� -,. ". -1 . . . - - - - . 4. . - I i - � ,� , . � I SAI I .,. p j . - . . � '. - - . �' 1.� I - �',�%--r - I I . - � �� c . .. I � . %-1 '. � - 11 - - � � , --U,9Z-A/r-, Caw-p4r:044 - I 1. . - � . 41 4� �' , I I - I �.. , 1. �g .- a � 11�- --f. � " ^ � �r � I A �- " � . . *m. -,.� � I I J�*� �- 'j7 , , �r - , ,*,,It wl�. - ,. - . ,-��R' I �� f. � ,Q,4A , , 41 l I - 1�, - , , � .7� , , � I -;� u �7 vw" , , -,� f --)x - g'.9 - ,, I � , --. . 11.1- -,, 11 . . - -- - a 4, 4 1; I I � v _,- :L %, . jj!k"VI �a I.- - , �- �L� � , 41- - ,,V-�W4 � , I r . 14 a - . �I , ,� . I ", I � � -- � , - I , , - I - �. I - k - -� - a-A � . * ,�'fN ,:r,�� ,; ,,,#,k, �1 2�, a � -44rk-317iXg -- , - Y k�,� 4" - F, f t: ,� I � -U - A� , --;t, I I Ift- � 'o � .-� I "i - , , � :;- .� ;� ")o' i�4 A :V, .�t ' i 1� - -0�- , , � t%l I I J; ,� , .e .P. 7 . - L L � � I I - 4 � r .. I . � - �� . , . , , a T � I- .INIV-,ly. 't, r; ,C/y -7NPV#' I � 'k . I , - � I '. , . - -- -� ,� , I � � '. *I � -, '. I . -11, k . 11 4 - I .. . � -- V� , - � - .�p - I I - .-- , 1"r � - I V- , I - - . a� � ,, . A , �.jI - /&�.,.,.� - 'Itt7l� , - ,vl ��k, ;, *- I T� �; 'A� �"Xa .. , . � , - , � a . I 1� o-,.,ON,910Q-77111, .., I I , , I � -1,' f� - - � . . ." . , - -1 . -10 Ixf 4, f -- IV . , � , ", , 4 � I .- � ,� . � � I ,��-�,, - ,- - - 'e, � ,,�;- ,� T " , A �, � -- ,Aq#1 e%ta. ,-', 'PI �, -, ., �i " i�, - . - . � 4 jr A" 'A�, , 0 - , . f , a -t , . - . -�j A . .. I I 11 f-.1 7' ' - I I � w- � .� , I - .. 1�# . 11'1�11t -�'i \4 �-- I I �� % � -7jovv 7 'VOig , -- I . I ., � � " . I ;. I'� " . :1 I- . . - - -, . I , f - . I � �, . I I I -P, ia- l '�,,, I � 1� , - , -4,. , 4 ,-�q , . -W 1.1� - - , I ,-, , � I Z,��: I * , , .41 . � - . I � ,,��, - .�' -; ". P . . lz� J;r, - " , . 1 11 ., 11 �� . - I, ;,�. : , , , 4 . , � 4' . L , " . AVII , � I -1 � � .,A - 1. , i , . , I j" & ,- . . �. ,P� � , , -� 'L k, I , I-p- 'L\ I . . . -- �1. , � - L , " Z--,,L.,- , - - �. - - "� , --� - I � ��, I . I ;�. I � . - " - , , , 4 e A , `�, f I .-I I - I I - .1 I � �-- �C:�j � I . ., , I , . , " : - � ., -- I g)�,,§1 � , Jf - I i, � �, ,e �, 1. ,*' 11 , t I ,J� / -�V. -�,?- %4 -1 I - . L 11 .- . -1 I v , I '.' e � .�11 a� - �m I , A !�-�'O:.i;, I .-. -,- - - , I � - t -� , 4�, 1 1 1 4vo,2�,.q. N I 1. , ,�? �4E- . . � " . -�, . I . I .. �, � I . � , ap � , '. . I -5. ,' f � v r', - * . . � - I - -� . -i I -, -,, � I '. - -I' - . - I ,z.� -,�, . , , 3 ivi, 't , .k -� I � i A f. V --� � a �l �:-' 'I , � : ,� ,� -') - -- k - I - - - POP 4 , ; 40 , � 1, ,,�� .�':z . .�- I, � � - �I , # � `- , - - ,� 1� - I I - "'t N + -I � , , . -., I KIV 4 . I -% --� �1,;;Y A ;,-,,.- ,,.-� -A I , -,,_ . ,-� A,* R r- � - I �% :I . I 1� 11 � . W,' I t � . a I � �, . � ,; � L ,- ,�41 r�, e-N . , � ��-,�,- I A a - - . I � I .� �,I- � ; I A � - a �., I � .\ I I .- . � � � , , -,o. '. .3 I - �- � �, - .*'. �,m , 4 � � - l�,.,., - I I � i;l . �--:,-- . , � � . . , 1 � I I I � , � I , " . � " f r r � � � . - ,�� " -a' - .!�, .4 . - - I Z ! - �� , � I I - . -1 '5� tIL�� -- % :,� 1, � ". . - � 2 � , I 11 , - I., �, I Ill �� ,� ,-!� :"� a a� ", ,! - I-, � - - C, - t'. 0, , �a Ilk . - a V I ,� �,� I -1 4 I I . �, I, �- I - �,� . , i . -, � I . �� I , t . 11 -�* " �, IV � 1, "�, a. I . �4 1 1 z % �'c 4o- ., , . . ,jr 1". - . I �;. -- I - � m , a I I ,I - ..... . - .�- 91491W �Y� , If . � � t t, I I .q t. , i'll , � � ) - . . . -- ��.,, . - W I . I �� : Z. I , 'k. .1 11 -- k ?wA'0w40,'�Ap-4&46t,�j` 11� , -4,19 1� ��, . I- IL - � - 1,41 I .1 J L. - A I 0 f � 14 It'4 * , V � I I . � � , � 1��o* �, , Ar� - - - , I �* 9 44� 1, -! �, - , "�- , , �-, - - I I%.� a �-�.;: A T - - - ' . I " i , , �, " - i � , ;m .�,j. I," .1 . i 1 � I, ��, I � -` w . - "' . 1 Ar I I - Ao , - - , Ik , I �' ' -- � � -pqi#Al+ I I; , a - ,� , I 4 � � 4 . a iL - � -'A , - , I � . � , .,,- , . .f, , 11 - ,� % '", � -t .� . - , � . I - I I �, ,� � "" - " - , I . . I I -1, a . - *11 - I I .1, � . - , mt� - 'j, I . � 4 - - � . I - � I t� � . I - , " . �� 7�-�,: I � a � : I "- � . . - " �, 7 *-' �v I .�!,- .. I �, -,-,f1',-:-� , I 4�, -,%-, � , t� 'i Z,l � k�;;��', � , I - a , � I , ".. , I , ". W, 4 � . . .1 �. Ir , � � . � M. * . I ,� - - � I . I . �� , A a '1v ;, I 1 A 1 i ',� ; , , v I N N ��,'-4;.� - I .,J�-- , , 41 'r, X 1. I , .,� � , I , . I . � I ,%r � - 1:i - - . -� & - - , .?* ' ,t,� a, . . c I - - 'a - . - �q - 4 - ,, ,;,' � 4-4 I vg �� .x�i I I%t I , ?a 0 - ,'-�',' k . p , I . � 4 . a- , I . I � a I . I ., -�� 1. .1- - � - .0 -A. . a .1 �, � I I 1* -1a - 1 - 1 *1 v - - I �. I -, � - I , - '� - "- " ' Y , , - 1 , � , . f, ,� �, 4 - . I � , , 11 1, � , - P, 47�� tFIM I � '_ , . I'MrZ-,: . V47fy - ` ; . - � I - " - �- I . . 41 - r I I - � . , 11 . - - 11 . � I, � , ,- 11, -� '. v 4 r . - I � I I . -11- --- . ., I ' - . 11 11 � - - . I - I . , I � ; , Ti . , . , -.- � ell I .,�. . ; u " w a -I � I;k -11-o � � �- � i -,1,', - - --\ , , , , , . -, " 4 - ,�� .i� �1� *frt ,4 � -, 14 , I 4ftowf -1 I 't- , - - I . , M, ,- ,-;, . f" -ff�-,P / I- "� �. t ., I .1 a , y I I , %, � , - - "i�- -�4 - k 1, - - 030A 4z � I . " ,4" 1 �4 ; - .) 0 �,jg I 44' 7ztt . -�,Cv��N � 4 la� - ,- a I IL- - 1 � �, I ; - I, - , �41 ,� , � a i I , � ., . I � .1 a 'A. - , , - � . - 4 , 1p* I � . 'I � a " L � -� �,- .- . I m ,��- - IL .�,- "IV I - � , j � � I 10- . . v I � � . . . ��.' . I I I � V, . r 7 - , -1 I �� - I . � � - I I , I . % I 4 1� I I 'Aw z- - � . . * , � I � , 1. I- - 1k - - r4 , � I- ,� I tl'W� � ,� At - .- A , ,- *t , �-�'n U_ V - - , . , ',UjDa.p"- 7 , e - I. - - . . -i I�,,� � I �I . . I �* - . � ,� � , �5 L� . . 1p�. . 4 1 - I � !� -, � 1. .- I , - � I � I � - � '. - � - t ,- ��- I �--I I -- 1A I - K) A, - m %. -2, ; - �,�, �,- , IL 4�p a , . - , � ,we oow I , � '. lw ,�-- I W�V/dw 11 - - � - 11 � . .. , , , Jo-�- , "iwl � 1--.. I- � 14 ir - � ,, , . �r - r *., �- 1 I .. I - . -11 j I I -11. . � -1'.,�. � I - �, I t, . � I . .- , 1�, -- , , ,i,7, - � � �. � ��r -� - � . -1 � � 74,f. - , , e,'-,I%xm�`- - ,- ,r�-' ' ' . -'Zt , I I . - , - " . --,�, - � ,'*,� . I I I I� - - . .. � � I - � .",:,, � - "I. -- W - , - '� a 1�4( �; -�,I�oq oo-,%<**.4W*v--�,W �- -.------o I ,-,� � - ,'� * I ., . � - � ;;� , � SWA � I I I I 1. � � � . I., 1 4 1 �_; I - . . lir - � � � I, ,�.,I , -4 �- � � , ..'.'.. I I � �,4�9-,s wtr.-%x x I . � - . I � � a I I I -� t . �� I . - I I .11 i I �j * � I . ,�, . I - I - � lva,�,� �� -ts - �1, .4 ��, . 'r �T-,--,,4�0- -A�-'- - , x - - ,f ,1�1�, , , V �-- '� I �.,� - - � � 1� I I - I A L , I , . � '� , - , -, - " % - , 1�waw .� � � - -, , � !". 7 / I I�,-�'r- - � I . I I . � � $, - 'r e - I t I-.I � a, I � �-, - " -� . j -. IV- - � 4 , I � � - * � �- �---��r,� � * ,I- ,, I ,,� � . . -1 . I I . � - � .1 I - ,.Y*07, z � . 9' I tlf.or,4; .1 1- - * 4'. -1 �,fs - � , _4 - � �,W��-�"") � -� 11 1�1 . - - . * � �, " , . I � I � . , . ,, , �, I - - -,"� � , , � .- � jr - I�-- "I'- '.. .. \ " , � 11 �1, I * W,lllw-llwwf;ollwlw"T,?7"w - � I . . � � , � , 'ZI � - )ZA - 1, - --`� I . . , �.-,. � 'I - 11 I, 14io I I - I I I -- , 01 ,I . , - -- . - ,t .� I - e k �4n,A� z 11, . -1.1 ,- " :- , I , , I . I I - I � 1 6 . . - , 11 -. - A , � I -- - - I I - . - ,- - ,� - ,,"� '1� -1 � � --.44-V � -I - ,.,.t, _W- , 0, - 4wk, ,�J I - * . � 1-1 ; - -, %I; --t, , -. 11 �, . -- I - �, t . . . .1, ',� , , - V �: � jwq1pk1w-mMr1- -, , - I � 1 . � , 14� . I � I I . . - � , #� '. f- - I I I - , - -�-- � - � - , I �- . t -rt -, . 3 . t .� , ,,�,� . . . . - �. .1 - , , - " , - )�;v k '. �I , , , . � � -, " .. " I,, . I , I ds.1-L-.o . � - I t 10 � ms�� W9 -� ,. , �. . , ,� I � , I 1111:11 I . " � . a § .- - , - . .t I , �C;�: - -- ?. - , A % - , , - W- , �-#, I . JA P - -,. I a � , -- ". I 40 _0�0" I&- I I -It� � � . '. 1� � I � - 1111111,I;: I � P �- , ID v " IWI, I. - � r - -'� 11�T I�x " '. �" AW%woww;---- oo,"� "Wmr�,im � -- �4:� If � , *"w"w*w"rjw-imw -�- i�l el- � . 4 � l I z I owl* ,- , .-I Lmo�'fr � - I-A I V073 � A -� -��, - 44�paiow 07 4?4 . I t , M A , , , �P*t , I , -jj-- - ' " " ,- r��4 - - � I � ,-1 (P A 4 01&z .7� �-?, -7 I t;�,, WIN " I - I I ',� I , � 'I "�� . I -1 I I I - --7�� ; --- -�-- 11 '---,I- I I . I . . , x�� i4tvir1liwr, iiiiiiii'll -, 11 0 11 A - . OL 4 � " - ....C��A-; i4z"�, �'!�,,,', � �, � � f . 11." 7 Ai t, ,1111-V I F Am V W -- V, ,,< �� .1. ij I idwvovlk�,11111 Vpvl�*YA 4�esoi ,44r�,,,* 0 ,1�w � e , 1 . . I . I . - --- --�T I Illlllli I ," X1, . '� � , "�� ;+.�, - 2 � , �:W, , * . ,4.a 64, ! . �-it,-�i), .4 --�- ! - �, I -� -4 -� - . gtvo, ) -��a�r,%�Z � I .1 - .� N- - . � ,- ,-,�� I 1 0- 11 **Qii;;6� r-1 I,,-J.,- ---Y��,*Y* " . � , 1, i� a a*--AwA"'AV - r I ,. .. 1. -- - - � ." I L, . - - � ii $()'/�ftm, - , , , I , - v i � . I �a . 7f , , � �.-- 4 I -r . ,�,i� r . � - I � . _� I � , , , ' ' �, - ,� � I ., A - I ,.- � � 4:- - ! ; - 7 ; I e -1-1 � I I - I I�-.�, i -, �v - t. I . . �w -- I I , 'Ii�- - Z7"- . I " . . . 1�� , .. I -s - , , , � 1 -7;:�.� � - W TjwW, s (3t- 0 - I , - I � � . - - � I - 7,zc 74# " , _- � , , � ---�'Lo� . ;;%� I �- . - - - 1 �,, t,,� I - - - . ,�, , , , I - -- Z � - -- - - - 0- -0 - -� I I .� I , i �I I � - , -.� I I I ,r , rZP19*4cz , - - , �kz�? " . . I i i irowlig a," , �, , 4 . � , . " I ; 1�1 1� I . - I-11 . I I � � I I -�� - - . C, I iroz.�7 i - �� - I - -� --,::� , - 1�� I - " . .1 �4 ,� . . . ..#" ., I� ., y TL I- , ,V.1 to� - 11; I - r . ...... � . � I , 4 - . I , " .7 - - 1 <;�-3/ - . , � -� . .�,. . F i- I 11� , I� 1 4,� - I L��-=,- T- �-t�-� :.-- - - -�� I , I .. - I �-v I I 11 I � A,i'�'. , ; " I V, 1 �4--I � I f - . -! ;_tf�- '��- -��--1 �. - ;'�4, i.- -. , * A -- ._�..,. k I i 4 '. , _ Aw,g -i _A 4"%, E7,;7 - - I � ; ,* � �, ? AM , . _ � :i ,6;_ V_ i t'l � IV t'Ir - V�ml , , I - , � . - . - --�k.�+I;,j�� '4�,k , " M :7,-;;�-- �j�-z?-k,,i.,;o " % .. -*",---�'*-"_-S-41�1.� - - �� ..� , , .- - , I , I- 3, .1 . ........� ---------* , � -14 - - ,;.It V-t-17- �, s -V - - ------�--" :<;::j , , I � -.� - 01" I �, . - : �, I - .i,�Z��,,?� L ' ' � I - 111 . . � - I-- I , - Cm � "W"3W -'% I , I � " , - � ` 4 - � � - . , , , - `10;4�1 1 � z , I -, r- - ' ' �- I - - (?-k�w,qw r-�� :i� ! ,- , ;v � , &7 , �� ,� -L L,�i , _-r . , - � N" - - ----� - , " ---L 11-6 - - 11 � � . . . -- �� 7 � �. f", - -, , �, , - ! - - - � , - t �. " �!� - . A � � . ,�,� �;* It 1. , , f- I - I . , �, ,�. `l! � f :)::16.:::� - ll, . � �ftw4vo . ,-- :: � I I �q� -- i,f� Y--�C;. � ,- 11 I - , I 1- 1 .-Z---��, -� �Aor W 121) ;--+�t-)� t - 'I., . I, � � I�, " v . - � , � . - '1� v . ,,,, . . --,�Y4-�4 1 . . z , I - I f . . I I I , �." , . � � -�. ,- , ,I , - , � - �..��r -�--� � � , - I - � ,4�,, I - I� I �, �$�- I il - 7 I ;- �, j 11� -�� . .4,, � I .-,, � oo,� T-J-� . . � , -��,- I t � -. - -I IS' . 11 ';:-��- - , . w , � I , � I . � t� ,,�-- ,6,1=-4� �;��,, "� ,-- - 7 - .. . I F�rw -, , m , .1. - -L' " , f ,� &t I � r. - I - ..a I " I ,*ip I� . . I ,.- I ��l- -4� - 'I, , I .� , � 1� , t2I � --�,'� T" 1 - � .� I 1�b : --- - - �- �� 2-P - Tz;" . � - � . - 1�, . � - 4 N'� � � '. . , ;j , - - �- 11 I I -z- - I- : - , . �, � . ., - I , � . - - , . I . ,.i A� . � � I A�', �'. , � . ,..� �, - � �f,� , - � � , I I--�� - I I .� - - � - . . '- �= k-4 - .1 1� . �, .,Za� � =-4-.:,�- ., �,� � , ,4:�� '. �, I I'$ - - , ��, ; L . - i � t,, �� , ,-- . 11 " -� '10 14� I -� , - - I -� - - r r,,4.1��. - 4 7� '---� , - I ,-1 1;4 11.I ; - I L E -� I I * ; - . I �'��% , 7' -,--�,,,. - t.� I " - - 4 1 �17. " - � I` I- -- . , �1 I � ,. � K I 11 21, 11 ..; - � . I �--,� 1!:::,:4 = �11 - - -� , '. -�,, -I I ,,-I,- -T�� ;..,A , -1 - - --. - I- , - Z�,k - .1 .1 I . 1;"#j"-�--Jjk" � I '. 4 , I � �Pl- - -- , --- . - ;�--- I I � - & , � .:,� -.. 1, .--===-: � ��t-*-� .�,` C:> 1� 114 1 1 -11 - . . . ' , ." - I . $*-.� - - ��, � . I - - - -� -,- - - 1 4 . I -k -'!- � - �-�- -z � r �4,*, 7��,� ;" I - I *"*-*""1&-� I � , , L � --.,� , �,,O .. I .I 910 I ,11k I � --- � ., I - - � � ....... ,ja, 1. I . I , ',;A,,,, - , I � -I I " �-> I - - ;,�� ,, 4 _ � '_'� i W, -- ,#jo,,,W�* , �� -4, -Z � I A IM - � -.- - . i x lvt�-e, *;7 - -.4 1 ,� � �Jk-,�r A *Am dwmmm*x tmwjw . - -. . , � --t ;� , .� r , �. .,-- - - L 'i - - I " -11......It I I , , - 1. , j � 4 ( 7---��. -i, . I - �� . :, I ��, r, ,.� ,4, --.. , -- �, �, �, �, - I - �, ,, I 14 �' .1 , - - fkl�,,oi I I . I I . . . I 1. .11 I � . I I - - 4 1 I � , I - . W - � �- - I - - I.' .; , - I I I � "" 'tJO**AVP* - - 74 �-$0 �11'11i. -'""wj5pwjW#0_*AWVJ#A9-4'W I- ?' -' ', - I 'I , �,�, - . - 11 '-I �r.4"-rl - ,4 4, "C' I --��- I I I , 1 6.IVi )��44' 1 -, �,�. , , . � C, I . 4 ::�� !;�� , C�> I � �� 1� I � .- . - -- - I I � - � 44", - - r . O�k �-, �, :. � )?�jmMLfA,WJ�,MWA,jW&,*jkjW' .� . _�,_ fkl� . - - I . � -� - --,�, .. , I -, 4,� -11 4 A,nrj� �",4,14-" mxj1w**AwJw , _ .7 1 � , I � � -. r- 4 .," � I 'I, � I - w" ,t 'i I �.�i44**49*1 1, 1%7 1 1 4;�-0/a dft aw - �--I,""'......... � � �1 - � - � . . - t , -, - -� 1, -I- - _.:.......� . ,., _ _ r - - '. , k, - I A*A � -� - - I I "I � - I . I -� I ,�, , - �. - ,. - �A_ 's, 1. . � - I I � - � j �. . ..,� ", � A, '* - VL--�-� I I n �I , *M*Anft , - , 'P4. � , -- � I -�. . - , L, -, I , � T I I I \ - � FF q . �-. I ' Zp � L ' <--N 1 . - I f . -.-�- I - . Ill , 11. 1L. . �I - ", � �r,l 1� . - - � "--f I -� , -, , , -��. IV7 *�,� wj,i$%* v'�-,, " 1 - *A1K",A1L0� -"1,4- , "I 1, 11 I I. . . - � - - � _ . * - 3m -- ,� *-,-�� _ k, � ,�, � - I * ---: �S� , � " U, I , I ; 11 - " V L� 0:�..j 7 --4-, ...� I � � � . �, , . Ill . � . - , 1�-EV . � I - ,. I .,� - . . .. � 9?1 - - , , /Xj'�--�*-,;�, �. � A"'W", , I i" ,,,. 4 �� " ', , '-%,� I I., � y, , " . .1 - 1. - � . , 2 . I -� �i, -'�: " I 'I �� , -, ,_e.., ", . I- - - '4 P, - I . . _ , - I � , �X-� I - � ,-- .:k�. " � I , � -mw*t 6wit , . ��, 4,�t ,*,- ,I . 1114 ��J, � - � - , -,�,� . 11 11- � -.. I ,f-R - , - � JLVW lo I � � i�-!-17 - - , - o� , , I � .1 - I , 414�� 39al .2-5, � I I .,r,, . I ,�,, - v I _,, ,, �I ,,�, , , -i- I l 11 - � �� I I - I . v -� , � *1 -,-� r, '-',5'f , . � I � I I * �. -Vl V1, ., .. -I - 11A �., , 'sr�*04* ,..-�,.- � � - - � ", � - . '�- � , - - I-, ".. I - � - i, � - " . .� ,cv--,- --� , 11- ,� �� I 'N-' - l-, ,-'- , - � - - L .�.- .� - I- � 'I 6, , ,.1 ,;q W-."'"I . -- , -I- � I- -',- -,�. ,,t-- - , I I , . . - � . C;�-t ; -4 1 -� �, � I 1. I ,,�"T �I7 -"11 -�., � ,I I -1 ; . , I ,� � � . � . "*-/a( � I - , ?A . f z . 7z; - ( � I I 1.� we'L - . 1.;� , , . 'I � "., -1 � P� 4j -i 04 . �� 6' , � . . ,%_� , � - , A 4 . . . ,.t .� . ilql* -;�, - ; I I - � , 6 I ;4fxfn1 "p,koo, - I ,I; . k�, � - - I �" 41 - � - - !,4-,�-,.iv� , -. .� .�. 4 ,- - � " - I I I ,-1, .- ,. kII:�..I&,�-� -4 1��,, 77 JV',"� - i J-U .. . 'o .. - " , �� , -,A , ". � I . t - .i , . , I I I I --1 % � � � . - I , . *-�f It . -,I � 4 , - � -1 I I I Al � 1�, A,� ��-,.4*1 - 7 . - ,l � � , e -- .1 � 'i'-'� If Z-L,Y, .� 4, -Z, , -4 - . . e * . 1� 1 ., . -1- . � 0. .7, � I � I I I ., �.-, , L. I ... '?I - - I I�,� I, -4 , I I - , -, K,�,-, 1� 1. I , I . I � .0 I � I . t. , , " . . I ,I� � . - -�-,- � ' f w- ,*'I-,I -" *1.1 -pp' ' '�,;'L %, I-.,I . . I . - - . - ,1- . .1 -.f- '�,- I , � I - .1", 1 . , . - . I . I .. . ,,, � , . �, � 11 I ,, � ' 'I . 'I I,� , ,;I- -,� ,& � I I � - � - , k , ��_r * I �-- : � .. . �4.1. - - -:-.,A, I I t 4 , )V � - .;" "% '41 -4 'N - � 'Aaftfts. & -4 �..* , - le , , �� I I -�, -�, Al , I . r �� - �i 4�� ,� - � .. t .1- I I C -, , I 11 � � - � I I � - I;;� �' ", * -Qt t, I *1 ,e� " "',T , . " �,�- . 7t� I - - .- , �,. ,%r I �� _ 6�' !Cl- , *Alum - 1� , I 1. I � -I , � Olt - IC9 :�� uo��,-' - I . 1 � I , � � 1, I . . . , I-) 1 -�214�� '-'�. �. . - L � ,, . 11. 11 L �� 'I, 1. . . , � - � * r� ,��,'w I, . � I� ; -, ;,,,� �� 11 -§-, -�- " � T ;� , � " A . � � I .. 1. W. � . . I I- - I 'I 1W .11 1� - - �4 . . I .� - 4"p��-- :.�, I , � I I ,;-�-,",;. j, 41 ,,j 4 " I . 1-�- . ,., 1, - - . --A , I - I . ,I . - I e � , � , � I I (f, .I ..., I A I. - ,,��.�, '.: - L - , I - .I- ,!�', -I - . I 'i . ,- � I -,-� I - . Alw I - , 4&, - L J� I � x � "t �1 - , " I .�� I I �v I I - I . t �* . � � A I � .. - I I . .� ;" � - I - � # 1� .� - I -� t � - . L , - . � `7 , . . 1, , I � , . . - -" � , I , , � MW 1"; �-r,- 4 . I L? ��' , -�k- 0 , �,T - I I . I I . . L I I -�r� -q T 0,5 - � I -� 4 ,�,! ,-' I*, .. I I �-, "- I - �- ,..- -,I IM � 14� � � , . i , I . . 1, - . -� , '� ., " l,� - 4 14W 14k,* 11 � , 4'. , -�., I -(,;�4 - .. � ,, ,,�.i."� --.ft� - .- I � � I I aw ""wj"Aw,i ,"" I � , , , . - . I . -r �'T - - , I 11 - . ""Tim"DWA-1 i , , * A � , 4 1. . �O� I . - ; I ,, . - - .1 . ,�� - -4 - 4 -��e"- I I , , ,� I .� � 11 , . I I .: '00.4M4. �, 1, , I. e -,.. - 1. - , � -401927��,:,e -�.', , . I -1 . . I . . - . . a I ;�I . I I . , - , � I , - ". - #` , , , ,�'t N , ,�- , s , � . I . , I , � , ,;Z.�, A* -1i .1. - � , '.. , , , - ,� � �-1;%7-- - - . I I I 0 / , . -11, . , .I I - , I . , � 4 � " , \ - ,.1� "..I I I 1\ � I I , -e � � ,�4 '7�, �. -- L I: 11,.4� 9 I 4, �� r � - . � � i \ � t , , A I - IC � V. K 4-of _ � I�.. � 2, j. -b . . . . .4.1 I � . I � - - I � I -�, ,� � , � . -t: .f�, I � . 11 I , . . I - . V." I k, - -A -, I - � , I I , 4y"Ilv ,.,-; � , . I I . -V:f" , , , �,� 1 . .,v*,1,f%S - -- .1 . . ,;�- I �.::Wl,lt� 10'. I . . 4 ,, . I , , . . I ,��- , .� . . . I I , Ij , - . I li�- - � I --` � , 41 I . � ; � I . v '��: 1� I � wx - - - � . I 1 4.� , - 9 I I ., o 1,,.�� ,�� - -k . " . T,7 4 - , . 0 T-1- *,-,, - " I �� I * . \ \,---4404&�� ,?v � I . I I , � I . - . �- I - . I , 144 i 66 11 -- � 11� I . i L ,A , - . -\ , l - . - 1�1 ,� . . i � I ,�k�,�r - 1, �. �, r 1. - �I - �-, i ,�- � '. I & . . L I I .� - � - I - L' ,I, � , --i. � , -,*.1:1= -,,X - - - ,4*� L I --.iP-V � , I �1��i I -� � . �,- . , . . T , I , , ,-P �,--l'-,, a;� �� I ., Vt` � , I ' �p , - X- � I - v,4k V-;�.�,44 � - � "� "I I I "�j ,Z�,e'.,-: - -, . 41�, 'i �', � L14 -1 - 1. 1 4 1 -,R, X.� 1voowp,Y I A I I � `I� , ' IV :$-.- 1 � I ,. � , . :�, -- f,�� w . � . i , � 1, , , . 11 - , , -;��j ,� ,� - "� -� I 4� I . � " _0 . -- A., IV � � � ' I - , . .l--e, - I 'It, *7� " '. , ,1 , r, I.,� . ,.. I 0�/.gntj , - , I - I I I � ,a�,: , -� I4 . 1 �, w -� , � . pje*� ��,A I � , , -� , � . ' x ,; , - it �. . I ... -14V t', 4 � -, . I I � . � , . in I I -- � , ,� I . I � � -1 . , � - . I .- � I : . I - t, - I 4 11 I 1. I I ' � . . 4 - Sc- � �, I, . �t. . I f , #Ahj,�I;l � ,�� P4 � � �, ,�,� : A'�,V,l 4- -;;�5�, - . � . I - . . I -, -. -,% I I - '. , ,,I,, . 11 , , 1, I � , , ' 41 - I � -11��60 . . . ; I tv . IL I � .. ,-, . � I A , - , ,, l I , -, - .. -,�� . , , � 1 �4. m . X, 1, I I ,I �� , Ift� . . * I . . , ,. , r . I I , -7 1,� 4 I I - I 1� . - I ,- , I � � � . � I � � I I I - L ' � . I , I � 11 -1 . 1 2 . ; . r �, s.- ` - ,t�- ,- � � - . L I - '.� 'It - I . L I I .�� . � .t� , I� �. W , I A � I � , 1, 1� .. I I . 4�,. � " �:'"�'.,, S I t I - , - �Nl I I . 0 -� . I , : A' , -V I I -- I . I � ." ., , -, � ,� � _ � crw �wr - -� i 2, . , -_,,, .. I � . . *�� - � I � I I , . . I 'I �t, � m ;- -11� .. �- �� x 1. . , �" � I , .1 j* , I I I i 4 , .,�,� " - � - � , , � � Z r)�?Y- . PP-/,Y 11 I I .1 I - I �11� . e . �, , , . �� I � -�; * , . � f 1, :. � �. al . , t ,�. lf� : �. - - � . I I", . 4 1 1 � � ' �4� , L, 4 - .1 . -,, T - -4, - I , � .11, ,iv �'-,� . � � - , k ��:, � I - ;�.,��A - � .�, --'�- � � �- 0 I -1 - - � I A ft. ,� I I . I ..I -,, .1 . . � ; . I - ' *T I i� - �' ,,#-� - . - . *-�,,11, I - I .I . ". - � � , , I- .1 ; . - 4,� I � , , �, - , � , : ( L ' t" ' � I -,�, - - � 'l- I, �� - + .ic I .. . . .., �1, ,�, � ,, . . � . 4 , 11 I . � ,5 1 . I , . I r 11 � . � I � I I . I� � I �t : - � 4 . � 1, , l . , -1 ,�� , - - I�, , e . I . � � . t� , . , , ;;,'. , I , � ,-�- 4' 1 - - - A-'�.- �- - I . .. .11 .. . � 1, � 1, .-.- . - � , , � '�- � I q I. 'J" * , , �. -v . - � 11 . 4 '� , -, . L - � '4' - , , -- -1 I - � � , . I . - � I I � I v . � 0 :,l �� 11 , i A7 , . I I . � , " ,,, �, -�, . . � i � "P� �� , � I t 1�1-1 4 , . . � I -� I , - IiA " , . - ,4 ,- -�1 . , �, I . .. . � , , - rtil � , - .I, �� I I 1 6 '. .; '� - ,�. ".�' � 1 ,4, � � � `l� . � I Iv , - , - 1; 1.1� I - � , L , ..�., - , .1 � I t- , - . �� 7'- -V � � I- I .* .l,,,� � - ,"Ii , I I �� -, -4 , e � . I. 1. -j" " �I . � � . . 1.11 ,- . , t I I I � . .I t I - , I . I - 1. I AA �t , � - - -- --� . -- Ir � 4, I ;� . �, '4 --- -, ,,I . � -'11 I,.;-; " �, - - � X� I .'IF . I , 1'�. , I - , l� . � � , �?'� I . t . '. ,4 . : � �,. , , - - -4� "" , - I - - � I , , . , - - , - 4 � � , I � ,$ - - - I I - I -r - : , , . , . 14� �� '7, ;%`rw?w' -� Ty �-� r . � 4' I , � " � , ., �� I I , - I� " f/-/,:?, . � I ,: . , I I , , 4r, t - '� - , , I , ,�-,4 - I I � � I I , ,, -e .,N - , , . A ,` ' - � . I � - I I � ��,lc ,; .-,� : q L� j ,)�C 5� , :- , r . 4 , . 0 ��r - ��4 - , I .1 . � - ,� I , -#� . - � - t -, � I `\,-�,� -,��, - .. . I I � Al " � , ,� - - � i - � - ,4 . -I ,� re I.- � � . - -4- 1 �ir , . .I., If f ,a� . , � I . . - IV . 4 � � "I . - I 1. I I I � - 1 � - - , r .1 ,j� ,I� f . �4., - ,�� - ,,,,,�� - �,t , 1. '. 4 � *,J,qn t , , I "T � - . .. � �, _ .�, A I , , � f" I,T�,,� ,�' -)': I . ��, - P� -, - , i� r, . .�k _, � � � 11 -� 1. 1,� '. ..; � ." ,I , - A 1� , �8'. * - - I � � -?)� �� - V � I 1 � . , , .# � , c I y I I " � 'o ,I: �-'* I 'It-.1 * I 1* �,., �" 4, - - i., , - � - . , I . .�-,'�. 1. I I.I 1. . �Jl �. I I .1 ,N - , .- � 1. r I � . - .1 - X, , � , I 11� � I � � 1. - - I - I ,,�` � 7 �A*"fl.; - " " � - � - � . . I I i , I I ,I-, ,P- - , - .� 1 4 - - , -, � A, . . 1, 4 I e I I � ,-,, �� -,;� ,.. � I 1:1 ,2 - 1�.� ' 1, - � ,',4-' k� I I I . � ", � -t, - $Z� - I , A - - , If : v !'�' � . . L - i, . 0�� 't,f--� - -'-�-�T-�, I �, L � !� '-il I ,� � , . ik . , . � , . " -:5 i �r�V� - - -- i- �,,A�� .71 1 1 � 1� - .., ., ; ,� ., L, ;F � . , , ". - - . I . � I . I � *1, A -�k�. .-, , , , 1, v 1 ,4 � ,,, j 4 I :-� � I 1, 11 I *.. , .� I .. ,, " � L:'-� I - � - 'P',1. �,� 4 - I " -'I , L.t . - 1.� � ., � V, - . , 1. , , - A � � - , - � - - � I - L . 1 _' � , III t�,-I".i�:�,- . I � I � - I r , �',A ft . r . I . . !b 1, -I ,.4 'j, , , - V . �' I ,�- - . . . / � - 1.1'- , I :�o , �; . , 1 : " , , l � , � .-,; . � � ",. ,- , , ,� 4 � � - I I-�:," � , 91 ,e , , .,I .� � -, � I �� . .I I �. �': 1 - 4 11 .". , .�, " I , . . .. f , L 1� . � L,' 1. l f� . . . - ,� I ' Xr, i I I I .. -�, .,F I --1 � 1 I 11..It� I I -1 ; -_ r - I . I - . T �� j, � . . , . . � - .1 � , -� I " ,� �� '. ., - � - . 4 1 --# I -I _?t , L I - - I . . - I ' � , �, , , 14 .- -� Ay- ,�� L,.+ .1 ,t j , .. . �1. - I , ,�� - t, I ' �- " � ; , � , . I I��. , !k�lb .1 '- '. I - - I , - � - . -,-� " - '� - 'Ke - 0 �,�.f, ,%,� � - � . ,, * � - j - . ,. . I , .IT I � �A'� . A� �� i�-,. . ; - � ,� " : � I - -- - I % . . . W �L-�e -:At - , 4 I . ",-V- � . -- T . - I I - . I , p I - - - � � , � tl �,--tv, , - ,,w ., � . 4 1 1 -:� � - -4� . ., ,�. � �.� , I � - I I I I - . I , - �,,� - t I , I I � � I . � L � I -,,�4- I , . ��, � , � - I -� �* i �L,�, - 4 f' . �, - - . r . - , ,� ,." -1 � � � I I *kl--* - - 4. : - . 11 C � . 1. p , ,�. I .e� I - I - - ; ,-11 � I , , � il . . .9 I � � A . " I c� � I .. - . I . .1 - � - -,�,� ,� ,� A �� . . I . - .) - ,� � #�. V:i - � I- - I ��, -- ,, r .1 I �� lr�� I I . �, . -, . 1H ; ,4�'.' j., � . " I I , -t�L I. ,I', - - . I - . C � I �Jp�,� ,'� . t ..�, , . �� .. , I . , . I 'T I , - - I - I - . . L, - � �, - I I � 7 - W -I I f ,; I '. , . 11, � I '� I I I ' , - ,X1 �� ;VvyY101� -, " * 't - 1;,j . A I� I . . . � I , - � . , , I � ., I -.- . . I .. , % - - -�, I , - - - k,. - t I �4 " t � � ; _ . � . 1j,"e"o", I . W . -. , , k , I - I . - --:3VA391 -�... W"',I L -7 - - - 7Y t" ,� 4 ,.� v " ', :1 ' 7 �;7 - . l ,r - . I . '** LN ( I . " I * - . �J- ; - � " , I � , . I . - � - . I - " I 11, -- -� 1 -6 - ' � , f "' � 1 ,$j!kt � I �'ki k �� "jk . I � 1�,1� � .1 �,�or .I- . . , I -- I I�I �, � - � . . - � . I E I v , - - - - . . -I . 47 - �*r �' � - - " - :. % - . I . , ,- I , -$� . .1.i. . . 11 11 I I " I - � I - , . � , � � . - �0 f - � � I . I I . � t 1 I . I 4 - . a � 4 �� ". . - 'I I t. -, -* 17. -, .-wr, .-1 . , I- . . , - v I . , j 4, � 4 , I - � � 1� I I � ,,,��. . '. . . . - I - !,rl 1-1f, .. 4k, -,��-, - ,� �- 4 . . 1� I L i - , , I I I. �. I . � " . I I � I - -, I . � ., , �, -A,,;;� ,:�, 46 - . . I . ,� t - w I � ,,,�; - . 11. ,,- � , ,.,A I I 1, I * � , A - ;' .:�-, I I .k . "� I I , � . �, I ..�11 I � 4 . I . . I . 11 I , . kk. � �?e� 3 . - -�!, . , " � I � F - . 1. . I I . 1. . . I I I - I � - �:-, - � A 1�! . ��t,�, z , � I I I *1 . I � - -- f 1� � : � ,tv � A . � .I. I . . . . - I,,- � r. I . � � .,� , I - , - 4 � , - ) � . � r _,� 'LLL It, I I I . 1� %� I I � � , � � , � , I -. ,- . -� � . 4- � � . I � . I � � - .� , - �, I I - . 1 �, � .1 1*�x I *, - � I - ;- I . , . . I I � .1. . I . , , . I ,,� � - , . . � " I I . ,. I ,I . � . I �� - I , 1� � �,��f, "''.t- zl�- � -;� I- -I - -1 - - q � . - � � t I . . .. -- . .Tll� 11 .. - I .�, �- . I -, , , - I ;�� *, I��, , .::4, i 11 31 - 1� t. .�, -- l-,. :�', f - z�I e, ; � , w � I - 70 ,; .I' ,- I . � -, , '�, ,,A - I �' 4�- � �'% j L "�J�jl - I � �. , . � - , . I � 11 i � � I . . I I �.� -�-� , �'A 1z ; 1. - " "- : I � I . �11�- � . : I - -- ; � 'K . ,� ,. . � . . I 1. . I -- � . I . - ". . 7 1 - `W � 4,1`l - -" -1 - , I I � ,� � � -.�, - - - . , , i - � � � . X�� , - f I � - . : I ,. . -t-1 .. W,4 ��' , � 'r. 'N� �z , , �� . I A I � , . - � I , . z , , ,- . I I ; , - 1 , . I e�- � . . . . . l . �. - .1 - I I . I - . � -t I I -�� k, .. �' - - .� . I-,?, .. L: , -.- I I � . .r. t . , . , , - I- .. - - �, , I � 7 - - � V. � - , - I I � I , ;- �- ,�i� ,'A.- , I , 47 ! - . % , ` "' , I . �I- .. . -�C 4, . . . . t I � - , , . , % I I � , , , , .�4- " . . 1 � . I 1. I ,� , � � 1 � � -: - -.- � I � . ' '. I . I ' �, L I �;, . .* ;r 4 �4 1'� -- - , I - I . I ., � . - - � - , !I- & " - -- 6,� 4 , .'� -k i , - � I I . - - I - 4k, - i , ,� ��, -, , -- ��-41 � '111�lr�4�'. ,� . , . -,� . - - -ft" ,�- - � - , t,� � � ,� 't . . , . ' It, . I I I . , I , I , . . A . � I -'Z-A, -� �, ,* I - 4- . 1i - -1, . ', �, -, , . - .� . , � .Oz' " 1, 4 :� ,.; �4, I ,- f . I %,�, I . � � , I � . . .I � � , . � I I - lo t,L ,1. - 11 . � . - I I I I i I 9/� - � . � X � 1i C� . -1 11 , :,I, , -V/I � �, I V1.1 - , . %5- '? : ��- - e s, `,w ,-, I I L ' - - ; L - I " � _ . - � -_� F � , - � ** I � % I� 4, -1 . w , , . r ., I - 4, , . f ,,- , I I I � . - ,-� '� �, . � - I ill � , #1 � I I I - . I � . 1� I I , �� m Wk - _�-, , � � -.�k,. 1� . " � I 0� '. 11.�t. 11- I k, 4 I V- ., ff � � � X.- 1 5 'o, �13;w-1z4-1 . i i , IR � - - �4 f .,�- .'F +� I --,*�, � 11 5 I I`- i 4- x AgrA ,9k?Sl 141 - , - - I t�- - � ri "'� ��f ,,�H9 - I � I�1. I E 6 , , `!,�t1Z./ ��A; 7 AA�4�Z YA � � � " - .,"111;�o , � ,. "A 0 , , I zn�� " I , � I I � I I 1-11 . , I . I . - ,�, � . . - � � . 1 4 1 � . - I I �-�. � �'.I'- - r �� I . , I .- f, , � - . o . I . I � I I � I �11 - k � . I . I . � I . 11 . � , , _ L. - , I �. 4'��V, - I I - z . , - .� -- ,.,I �, - ., _ . - I . ,� , . . k � I �, I .1 I - � I -11�1 - , I . _ �_ I �, -1 I 11 � ,�, � 1, r, - -I-- . - �- t. - --- � , f , , 4 - n, , .C, i . .� . -r - � .� : . 4 , , k., .-- I oz . � 1, - .. , .� � � . - ", . . ,- : , . �_ - - I - ; � � , �i , - - � . , � , � ,I� . � I L - I I 4 ,* - ,�� A, � - --. .�-*�* �-�-.,I� � kr� , �� ., - " I. � ,� --, ,.!,� , , . � ,,�-�- �� I '.'l .0 I - . �, . 4 6 � . ; � I - I I ,c .� , , I I I , � '. 4j,� *� �' 'A. I I � 1��... Ite .:, , , �. .- - � .I , � , - �,11 I I . . ,` I .1 - I I I � . . . I I I � I � -� . - I - �i` r 4r , � � ,'. - � to � �, . : I I . ., e I - . I " �� - I- . . . �1- -. . I - . � I \ . ' 'L i . I �,-t - � - --,-,*O-.-I . , -.- . ,� - - - , .1 � - . I I ,k" - . .� ,, � , , , '.., . - I I I - 14' -.�� .'.t., � I � - � , , .- . ,�,� t - - �� .f - - � , T# -�r� , V I , , *� , , . . I � �� I , - -�- I -�� - , - , �# -. , - I . .� � 4�,", Y- - .. *,-, ,.�i . . . f. � I � � � r I - , 7, A 1. , I � - I . � - , I I I . 1. - . I .. 1 .1 �, .� ,� � � �� I; 1 �4 , � t � . , . .. I, i�� ,i , :,,�*, : , , , p ,, , � 4 i I, - I � ';'b--1--,-" - . ��I I .I� � � ,� -V 4, r, � I � � I � . .- . . At ��`; �- I-�- , �:-- , - - ', _ -� f�� I A, ,I I . I ", . % I . � T, � 1: ,, � , If, I I - - , -; -, f , , , - . iA,,, "r. , '%, - 1- I *1 L � . I . I I I , . . - -,j . " ,� L . - . I I I - 1 �� , . I . - .1 , ?,.� 10,- T- C . � . r7- -.e,-;. , � Ir �, ,".1" , I ' liL' 11 "' . i ,. i I I 1'.1 I , I 1� , I 1i ., , I ,�' , �" �� - -�� - ., ,7 � - , ; 11� 9, �, ,I - . - � 1 , , , . , , I I , 4 ,. , � ,:, - f . . I � . - �. 1,l" - I , - , ') -1 -- � i 1�" , 1 . I , L, - I '.. � � I� - . . �4; - . - I 11 11 -z�- , .i-,", - . , � , , - . - � I , � � I- , � I J� - � I I , - � L4 " � . I *� � %, . *� . - . ,�� .;:,,Wiq. I � . - -� � � ;� Vl�11 . �, e d� ( 1� 1, . :ol , � - . . I - . . I " , ,�-_� f 1i - I I - -, � " 0 1 ,I , ,A! I - .1 'A .- � .� I . �,I I . � I . - I - , � I � I � .. !1��.i - -� �� . � c . I : � , , " �, , t, ,- �. 1, I , � I��,T- 114 6-V, , �A I W�', 'At . - . -I .� I I 1 -1,,. ,, � : I - 1 I- I ". I - -i. , - �, I I - -� - , � . ,b. �- A. �, I i. - . - � I . 4, - � i, T,,I-j� � k z ,- - �'" "' j � -. I -r . 5 , 7 * % I C" . I - , 1. . � I r I � I .."r '.- ; I I , .Ir I' � I X1. ,�� I e - , �-T�41: * I , ,A � -A. I . ': e I. . . � I'll � f 4WA ,-�% , - � ir I - . 4 , k I , , 1 4 �!�. 1 7 - , -1 p -,�&i � I . - I I I � ; �11 - I'_I- - 4% .,JLtj. I %;� . , Vt. . - I . I . , , I . . I .. 7 x-� . ,It , I , 11 I� � I �% 4� - . . - I ,� � 1. -�� . - � - . . . . . I I ,.-,� I 1 4 ,1 4'. _�,.� . � �r -'��- .., . - ` - �e, 4 � , " - - -- , - 'w � . . .1, �, - ` .1 I , � �. . 4 � - .-. -1 I . . '��. i, - . "': � I . � - ��! � I 1� , .1 I � . . � ,L � -I ,- , � I,-, , "'V-,�&-,-,5- -o- or !�o- . � - � � �- � I "�- -f.f � V4- % � - � . - , 'e. , -V-�--- I I I - I �,, I � - & 9� All - . 91 CVHd f 7 K1Y9/,';� , I 1 . - 1 . ., � t* I .1 I I - �!% , - , , L 1� . -N� 1 .��711 � -�� !� -� ., I 1. . � � Vr ,-� 1. . r . i f . . �, - , � � - , . - , � -r, 4 , � �- � -1 L, 0. - . . .� 1. " I -1 � * . � I I - . , , �1- . I �, ;�, I . I , J.�-� ,- # -, . � . �11 , �,,e' d � I . ; -� �,� : , 4 "', - I I � *' - Jl 4� . . � , - I;, . 1"', , t , 1, I : � , I � I . . � . , . , I ,�, � I , . 4 I , .1 I 1,7,� . , " ,�j ` : I - !r . �,0 � � I. ; ; , r, . , - , v - �, I � I I I , t,�� . . - - I� ". 4� '. 'Le ,,-7 v � 4"- . , . I . I I '. , I � �1 - � . - . I I I / , ,t :��,,t'�� - I " . I ff - ,� �, ,r I I I � . ".. ,� . ,' I - 6 - I � ,o , .1 'I'.�� , ,- - I - I I I v , -I 'L �� - � .. -- , I I , -�- " � , , , .. ,_ I ,� ., I I I�, , __,� - - .1 .".1. 1,,, I ,s, !-,4 . A � �I'., - - 4��,� 1. 4 e I . I _� -,t �,, I - . . I $-� 1 � , >�" � N -�� . . 'r- .L �,� 7 1 . , � � . - I ? . 1� I 'd A. e . 11 tli I . � - , 0 -L /;IV - , � I � . . I" , . . � . r- %- - . , , � � k . I � - � I - � � �i�, .�' ., r ' I.1 - � I �. � .: - 7 , � I � 7 , -1 , -- I , ,1� �. �- � I I , . I .* "t,m,tf � "O I� 4p - , �, , I ) : - - . - . , . � -1 � - . � . 1. . . � I I I �, -�,,.��t :,� , . � �,- , i . � � � ,._ . �, 7 � - k ." -t,., 1. I ', . �- �- - , -I ;- I - , I,--j -, ,mI , -, "� . , I 111 - �- I - 1. * '��.I , r - ; ,%'� r . '. , , - t - , , " �� ,T �. �o � ,. I - a �.4;.!,�� -�� . . - l, �- -*-- . - .4, ., "'�� I IF, - - - .." ,� p., "'a ; , ..��fr ,� _ _�I� --.k..1�-O��- %_1 - -1 - 111- - - - - ".. .0,QA., ..,o .A.,-� . I 1, N. N r t4 - �-,-,;j ,b - o � , t, � , . - �, _r ,� � , ." , - I I �� , , t , � '. , I . . � .;�,.r;',J�,� g I - - -- � , �� -- 'r - , � -- - - -AI - - . � 11 - : � - --".��'4k � I - . I - r � I . � I - I � E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO., INC. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 . GENERAL Highland Avenue (Route 107) is a major north-south link between Lynn and Salem. It is a 4-lane divided highway in the area covered by this report. The existing roadway is 32 feet wide in each direction with a 6 foot median on which there is a guard rail . There are two 12 foot lanes plus an 8 foot shoulder in each direction. There were a total of 34 accidents during 1970 in this area. The existing ADT is 22,600 vehicles on Highland Avenue, 5,100 on Swampscott Road and 5,500 on Marlborough Road. There are several accident hazards in this area. There are many varied turning movements to and from several retail stores and small businesses along Highland Avenue. Vertical and horizontal alignment of Highland Avenue creates poor sight distances . Signs in this section are generally inadequate and should be revised. 2. HIGHLAND AVENUE AT SWAMPSCOTT ROAD The problems at this location are centered around turning movements to and from Swampscott Road. No separate storage area is provided for traffic from southbound Highland Avenue to Swampscott Road. Vehicles attempting to make this left turn must therefore stop in the left thru lane. Since there is no signal control, the motorist attempting this movement must wait for a sufficient gap in traffic, while at the same time making himself a target for traffic traveling southbound on Highland Avenue. A check of the attached accident summary will show that there were at least 6 accidents during 1970 associated with this movement. This intersection is located almost on the crest of a hill and in the middle of a horizontal curve . These two factors combine to create poor sight distance from approaching north- bound traffic on Highland Avenue and for the southbound left turns to Swampscott Road. Traffic entering Highland Avenue from Swampscott Road and DelCampo Avenue must first merge and then wait for gaps in traffic before entering Highland Avenue. This requires the driver to watch in three directions at the same time while proceeding through a decidedly hazardous area. This only serves to increase the danger. 3. HIGHLAND AVENUE AT MARLBOROUGH ROAD The main consideration at this location is the safe movement of traffic to and from Marlborough Road. At the present time, vehicles attempting a left turn from Highland Avenue northbound to Marlborough Road are harassed by the lack of storage area, poor signal phasing and inadequate signing. No separate storage lane is provided for these vehicles which forces them to stop in the left through lane while waiting for a gap large enough to make their turn. -2- E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO., INC. Existing Conditions (continued) The existing signal allows for an advanced northbound movement which creates an advanced left turn opportunity. This is done by using "ball green" signal indications. The advanced green phase leads directly into the north-south phase with left turns permitted. Since the southbound traffic starts without warning to the northbound left turns, they suddenly conflict, creating a hazardous situation which is the source of a constant stream of complaints to both city and state officials. During 1970, there were 12 rear-end accidents associated with this operation. The accident summary shows these accidents graphically. -3- TOPICS EARLY START PROJECT ACCIDENT SUMMARY ] HIGHLAND AVE. - BOSTON ST. FOR 1970 AREA 2 - SALEM, MASS. HIGHLAND AVENUE AT �j SWAMPSCOTT ROAD HIGHLAND AVENUE i rz i I I r - t i I I . E 0 Q O H 4 ACCIDENT TOTALS BY TYPES LEGEND pDomage Day Night Total Property Damage Only —fig— Rear End Fatal Accident —$ — Sideswipe D Personal Injury — Overturned Moving Vehicle > Out of Control �A Pedestrian - - > Fixed Object Parked Vehicle 8 5 13 8 5 13 E.LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.,INC I TOPICS EARLY START PROJECT ACCIDENT SUMMARY HIGHLAND AVE. - BOSTON ST. FOR 1970 CSN AREA 2 - SALEM, MASS . HIGHLAND AVENUE AT MARLBOROUGH ROAD O O� � I JO l � 4 w j I HIGHLAND AVENUE ACCIDENT TOTALS BY TYPES LEGEND Type Day Night Total Property Damage Only —><-- Rear End Fatal Accident —vim— Sideswipe Fatal Personal Injury >ofi— Overturned Ped. Moving Vehicle --ir Out of Control linjury Pedestrian - -> Fixed Object Other Injur Parked Vehicle I Prop. DOM0 a 11 10 21 Total 11 10 21 E.LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.,INC. E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.. INC. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS 1 . GENERAL As the analysis of volumes at these two intersections indicates, there is a need for better protection of vehicles making left turns from Highland Avenue to both Swampscott Road and Marlborough Road. The proposed improvements are based upon the provision of a left tum lane at both locations, within the existing right-of-way. This is accomplished by relocating and realigning the existing guard rail and divider island. Also, the existing breakdown lane is utilized as a travel lane which permits the improvements to be made within the existing curb line. Repaving will be necessary because of the divider island relocation and breakdown lane utilization. Because of the need to utilize all existing pavement width for travel lanes, all parking in this area should be prohibited. Parking should be prohibited on both sides of Highland Avenue from 300 feet south of Swampscott Road to 300 feet north of Marlborough Road. Parking on Marlborough Road should be prohibited on both sides for about 150 feet from Highland Avenue. 2. HIGHLAND AVENUE AT SWAMPSCOTT ROAD Recommendations for this intersection include a left turn storage area, improved signing . and revised lane markings and lane use. A left turn lane is provided for turns from Highland Avenue southbound to Swampscott Road. This is done by realigning and relocating the existing guard rail and divider island. Traffic from Swampscott Road should be channelized with an island. STOP signs should be installed on the Swampscott Road, DelCompo Avenue and Thomas Circle approaches. KEEP RIGHT signs should be installed on the noses of all islands. The left turn lanes should have LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT signs installed. Pavement markings should be revised starting from 300 feet south of the intersection on Highland Avenue. NO U-TURN signs should be installed on the northbound approach of Highland Avenue. The proposed improvements are shown in detail on Drawing No. P2-1 . 3. HIGHLAND AVENUE AT MARLBOROUGH ROAD As previously pointed out, there is a critical need for left turn storage . The recommendations provide for a separate left turn storage lane. This is done by relocating and realigning the existing guard rail and divider island. In addition to this, the left turns are further protected by the use of a separate left turn phase in the signal phasing. The signal system should be semi-actuated, with Marlborough Road and the Highland Avenue left turn lane having detection devices. The existing "ball green" signal lenses should be replaced with appropriate arrows to control the separate movements and eliminate any confusion. -4- E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.. INC. Recommended Improvements (continued) The left turn lane should have LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT signs along with LEFT ON ARROW ONLY signs to supplement the signal indications. KEEP RIGHT signs should be installed on the noses of all islands. The southbound Highland Avenue approach should have WAIT FOR GREEN LIGHT signs. Pavement markings should be revised starting from about 300 feet north of the intersection on Highland Avenue. The proposed improvements are shown in detail on Drawing No. P2-1 . -5- E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.. INC. COST ESTIMATE The esimated cost of improvements for Part I is $65,000. -6- r E. LIONEL PAVLO ENGINEERING CO.. INC. „ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Consideration has been given to the possible impact of the proposed TOPICS improvements on the local environment. A summary of the categories that were reviewed and the results of the investigation has been submitted separately to the.Massachusetts Department of Public Works. There were 32 specific categories of possible impact reviewed, many of which proved not applicable to this project. Of the 17 categories that might apply, the most important and relevant are those concerning safety, travel distance, costs, travel time, and so forth. The types of impact reviewed that were positive in nature included access to nearby sites, historical areas and sites, future land use, development of public or private facilities, regional development and other projects and programs. Also included are other transport- ation services, community service and educational institutions. Those categories relating directly to TOPICS included health, well being, safety, future transportation needs, travel distance, operating costs, highway safety, travel time and comfort and convenience. The categories having negative impact were archeological or paleontological salvaging and disruptions caused during construction. The first is very unlikely due to the limited amount of excavation. Disruptions are unavoidable, but because of the limited amount of work within the traveled way, they will be minimal . -7- LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED O Signal Post 0-0 Steel or Aluminum Most Arm �— Mast on Wooden Pole y Wooden Pole C� Sign and Post —�� Signal or Flasher Housing — K Flashing Beacon Control & Meter Pedestal --Cc Pedestrian Walk-Don't Walk Signal —m ® Control Cabinet ® Pedestrian Push Button Roadway Vehicle Detector Overhead Vehicle Detector —0 0 12" x 12" Pull Box 8" x 23" Pull Box — — — Curb Line Underground Cable eoeo Overhead Cable - - --- Pavement Markings . — — — No Parking Anytime ¢tet sa 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGPNEERINU ;.J 10.99: Forms Fors, 1. MASSACHUSETTS G. L. C. 131 s. 40 NOTICE OF INTENT ALL PARTS OF THIS FORK SHALL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTY OF PERJURY INCLUDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FORK ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF OR THE FILING MAY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE DATE z4 M A¢ 83 1. Notice is hereby given in accordance with the provisions of G. L. c. 131, s. 40, that the proposed activity as submitted herein falls within the jurisdiction of said statute, and is located in the V►\6lkt0.►e0 "AZ. %U3k1-S0saST city/i wm• SALMAd %Ak. S..aa aAoscot 'Qn 4 Rats r Street. Recorded at the Registry of '5CwE. 1.0MmwVu SA , Book , Page Certificate (if registered) 2. The name(s), address and telephone number of owner(s) of the subject land are: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. �t,.wo '�ro.�zkTe. '�'�oa¢aa._st. asAt.e►+► Z44.o�'L- Wo 3Tokk� e3dQ►�ta( . 6644. 3. I have filed identical Notices and plans by Certified Mail with the following: Conservation Commission (original) Date ZS MA _%15 Kass. Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston (3 copies) Date T.S "A.% '�!3 4. Nave all permits, variances and approvals as required by C. 131, s. 40 been obtained?_W (yes or no). Attach copies to original Notice of Intent. W&VT► T[tuak. of K-IMM-• .• ` VAc.%&%S• 5. Enclosed is Statutory Filing Fee of $25.00, payable to City or Town. 6. The name, address and telephone number of the owner's representatives (if any) are as follows: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. Attorney .TG►ka)�•cr14:RA.FIID► Syk`¢Al. `Jr. a , o'L\'L Engineer-te%t 'C E. -Wpom1 . TAC SAiub 'T5rt.�.5kkt�aJ�4a boo Agent 1? maax FE. 0la�cAA► rz4o Gwon St 8s>*►�A 8��• l oo 1. The.purpose of the project is: (Use additional sheets if necessary] _ 4 Sys 'T:61L" — M � �l�,• S. Owner's (or agent's signature) 40 ) -- �? 3 �(HDFM q ROBERT I,\t ,d E. m MASCHI g NO,23655n 6/30/80 FrsYONAI. of. 12 222.9 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: Foxe 1: continued i WgTLAND pR=CTION ACT ENVIROXHINTAL DATA FORM 1. All parts of this fore are to be filled out by the applicant or his agent under the provisions of 0. L. C. 131, s. 40. 2. Where a section is not relevant to the application in question, the words "Not Applicable" should be entered on the appropriate line. NAPS OF APPLICANT µlGb4L k%A �A"�Z� TR'• �AFA2 f0 C o t•tQi.V t iw'b 1 S ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Zq 6 sk"oTT �� AbNL.As�O .N a►• CL'1 L1 MUNICIPALITIES WHERE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED AND NOTICE IS FILED Cltk DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTT INVOLVED IN APPLICATION (including the dimensions of any existing building, decks, aurinas, existing cesspools) DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED Ol THE SITE, including grading, dredging, removal of vegetation, eke. t �• p.e:coNPY.aJVt►1�gy A. SOILS 1. united States Department of CpM6la�AT�O►D O!< <Ji Qt.� Agriculture Soil Types (sb. me map) a Q q��,ti- r e '1Cit t ��)ttu tAttt e,s CtJw+ a 4f et- 2. Permeability of soil oa sits. (Dates of testing) _ Kteetrtu its ln..� :RNSA KILL 3. gate of percolation of water through the soil. (Dates of testing) \ Nor A4Pt�efaet a Cte�e Sts aoQ $`tsrQ+t1� 3. SURFACE WATERS 1. Distance of site from nearest surface water (Date of measurement) t<wtta.a QrtYOL7r L ts.LLtS►� AT •PttaastiT. 2. Sources of runoff water 3, late of runoff from the site SZmQis t Q a ��p� C•{.S. _ Bm 4. Destination of runoff water u60� �ad ries �1P�.1bdQ.. �ACNQ SQw1S �'�m�lr �� l S. Cheaicsl additives to runoff water an the site MAIM Vol. 12 - 222.10 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 1o.99: Forms continued Form 1: continued C. GROUND COVER 1. Extent of existing impervious ground cover on the site l.-oa,A4_ % Tbp Sm t_tOL • so% 2. Extent of proposed impervious ground cover on the site Lis 14 TAp4%rtt_ t 54adSett_ 3. Extent of existing vegetative cover on the sift-e i ♦. Extent of proposed vegetative cover oss-�aTSy the site D. TOPOGRAPHY 1. Maximum existing elevation on site 2. Minimum existing elevation on site Ct.91t). — 1�3.of 3. Maximum proposed elevation of site j Gt.ct,. = l�•o 4. Minimum proposed elevation of site .� S. Description of proposed change in topography 'Best �.t_r.•oat�pitft �� "�.su �. E i.1 '� B. GROUND WATER 1. Minimum depth to water table on site (at time of filing) 2. Maximum depth to water table on site (at time of filing) Gt�,1• — 115.0'x_ 3. Seasonal maximum ground water elevation T. WATER SUPPLY 1. The source of the water to be providedto the site C.t"m c m oma.C.& — MalyuG 2. The expected water requirements (g.p.d.) for the site -2dC zoo C%&,_ Q�.Usa3 3. 76e uses to which water will be put L LT _ sr@.A� rCartc�ss�Gt14� 6/30/80 Vol. 12 - 222.11 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: Fors continued Form 1: continued i G. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 1. Sewage disposal system (description and location on the site, of system) COvr,wr Tv Extst..�a �L�1tGtPAt_ S�STC-'N 2. Expected content of the sewage effluents (human waste, pesticides, detergents, oils, heavy metals, other chemicals) M[&ImA$ne.] LAaA&1M 'flCTlQt�G.sTS 3. Expected daily volume of sewage /� � -LOO ,000* �mP•l.• 1?ea •DMi E. SOLID WASTE 1. Estimated quantity of solid waste to be developed on the site Darr A.PPt.ACAILL G 2. Method for disposal of solid waste torr!' �p PI.AGAKI.Pt, 3. Plans for recycling of solid waste NOT A4pu4C1as%-e I. BOAT YARDS, DOLES, MARINAS 1. Capacity of sarin (number of boats, running feet) ►�dS' �P4lAGAtS�-E 2. Description of docks and floats (site, dimensions) ' ,Oars AQPucwltt.s` 3. Description of sewage pumpout facilities (type of waste disposal) 1�oT PrPouctse`� •. Description of fueling facilities and.fuel storage tanks L�Cfr .p+QPI.LCA.BI.E S. Description of fuel spill prevention measures and equipment 1�oT A9?lUcwet_6 J. IMPACT OF PROPOSED ACTION APPLIED FOR 1. Effects on plant species (upland and serine) Uou>✓ 2. Effects on marine species (shellfish, finfisb) WDT �.PPt.ir wdt.e 3. gffects on drainage and runoff K.w7trwAt_ �'D.en "� $tnPORC-� �s�Sey •. Effects on siltation of surface water$ 44.utawe.by'flals Ts 'm.ronsmn etnw� CoMt[Oeti, 6/30/00 Vol. 12 - 222.12 Ii 310 CUR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: Torus continued Ton 1: continued S. Effects on groundwater quality 6. Effects on surface water quality 1.9ouL E. ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED ACTION 1. Describe alternatives to the requested action 2. Describe the benefits of the requested action over the alternatives dt �sO..�t0.t. �DUV�taPt�tTwR' lutTlot. ldtutrta„t Dt+tvtt9r..�ca OP t.Sxtst%*bq TeQoQO:aPtatc�s� �RiS . ', �> C�*�TlttacT A.00ltta+lA.` C(— OF —OFM 'N OF ANS yt{� o ROEERT c1a :oto ROBERr Sinyo P MASCH 1 E. 9N0.2365501 rn MA951 y ISTEp��`� I�QiSTEa4 O �sSYONAL�6 qMO SORVE�O� ' LIZ" C�f i i 1 i 6/30/80 Vol. 12 - 222.13 li ADDENDUM: QUESTION 1 BOOK PAGE DESCRIPTION ACRES 5292 734 Lot 6 14,89 5292 734 Lot 2 6.44 i 5292 734 unnumbered lot 5.P9 6172 734 3.13 n 5292 734 lot 3 4,46 v 5292 734 lot 4 7,22 60117 793 lot A 8,2 43944 197 lot 567F 1 .03 5292 734 lot 1 21 .33 F. w 5292 734 lot 6B 28.31 43581 196 lot 653 4.50 I 5292 734 lot 5 10,18 y�l OIS IIe I p �F r n � _ 41 / � { "tas 1'• 7�' .�ai vo 1i o•I` n' w �, � r . -P r•� 'L>: , .,•J i Jl _ + I i IH _ I _ iy: v .n. I Y.�y �� e•• •s I fg \�' lv� \\~ S5:. ... 40 M. • 4 L'1 cd r� D Y $` �I ♦.• is -.Y. ✓ �Itr o 'fir �� l� - � i 6� �Il i o. / o i � .. � Ro p ..'/'� � r ♦��, i. 04 x w,ICa.t Eni i I Y'. • r /: • `P. 1 I. Q Ib '1� l 1 / a •f pyrl ♦.. of. 14°�ISOt ;`�. �D•'�, g .D � ,_., _��, v � Ml's �/ v •I+ , � C. �J� I �.cri��..'�} �• Lfx 1 I V � • � j �i� /�w w� ` ! o • �, \ � �� .. II •..� a" s, y 1 �; aylr•�}a ��.yI _ -' .► _ ( \ , _ \ r, •, i..l ~.41.` ' I} ,�z aim' �•i 4-11 y� I M n •T rz� � �', � �s � . 1 jC 1 17 A. I/ Y ' 7 0 s .� s i J .; ,a Z4 S 3 C �►u.��iz. � I•�\ fbtt_v...a0 �-+C—P.tZ� TRUST ��tHOFM4fs p�TI't\o►��Q. �AFAQ O CpKPAv � ES ?� *� o ROBERT 4� N o O GISTEP �sslONALEN6 / Ake- L toe - 3 • O \\DtH CS \1� 0ub6 k1GA)it - -MPG. _ _�AP►tITlE3 t»\\-sC� '. .. _SE61.�2E -�ES1Ga� ��-OL> . -- ----- _..-ToTO•rL -----'P_lP-6_S___--� ---eu�..ti C-tr_TS- _----l�►�E _---At-�-.._.__T14. _ _----- ca►�_--------------- ---- A ----►oo- Q-•---- �oQ- . ---- Gt a -_ _ lzch Tom p.L %---TtAczQ = •b. C L = Cu. T.T. PEQ Svc-. AALa* IN too Q100 'Jo. Ac¢ES EsusT• Pa cp Ex\ST. 'Q2op, E1UST. �Qop, 1 q2+ 0-7- o.i s.2 sz q6 q� 2 14t 0.5 04 �.5 6,9 4% 5% 3 toot o•4 o-1 S3 6.9 38 too 4 tot 6. 4 0. 1 To 24 49 s (at 0.4 0-1 r&.o 3 t4 3t 6 tot 0•4 0.6 zS 4t 1 tot o.3 0.4 6.0 1$ 'Z4 $ iZt o•3 0.4 S•8 6.o Zt ml 50 10 - 4t - 0---3 - 0•r' 6�'Z-_.._ 6.5 - _-.$ t- 3 -- --° z---- -4r ?At 0.7- o Z... — - -4$ - 4.S l` - -- 2Zt o.-t -- - Got -- - - �. '4•b -- - -LSS 'TcAr+t 4°!2t -ISO t 0®O� A. YSAM-\Ll. AQ-6/, IJo . Tl,.osa>t 'FfLoK �\ldGk4tAw�D �JE . T4kQ,t> 'T41E GLot-F CouQ-SE c� Gtc�3T� {+.T Ti4E EXIST 4' x 4' �8ox Cup vE-cz� A-c ^$os�ro� ' S�� AQ.E-A �0�31DTS O� A�PQox . Td Z.o�le --- -- - 1-Deus - Qpµ P►?Qtotc. 000�_.__ - w Pet-% 7FOAL- C iso m?..w 4r -- A'PP q-cic _l O oo'_ __ __ CkaCK£�Ow?5 A�s•�q T4tE. "�• •Q• "Ttc.P,c�c.s Cows ts'tS o� �4PQox . 'L� � Acv�� "To 6t_�v. ZS•o't wKicw �s CQ.1TlCAG,,, • 'Twp 'R.'�. Taocts . AE3wc �t� Z5 ter. Et.�u�.rto� . oR- APPeox. C54r jteoojaacC cltmts . Qwb �� = sg4g C.{• S . Q:on CPaoP. ) = -1(03" CA- S. 4> S ro2aGE. "TtKe s 3. 4 _ A40 u Qs 1r'lA.x. Gt w, c� Tri o0o t N C� too Y2. STottY\ ----- - __w \T4► . -_ Tk+e� ttsTlact ----Ca'��6rtT---------------- - ----------- -- Asl wz _. -- ------ --- - At.�c --Coy.�Tcxo t-�-t �• ---Fc c w ------ ------ ----- ----- --' - - - -- -—--------- - - - - - - - -- - - --- - ----- -- . . ----- -- -- - �•_.g-cao - ,�z-gip.. -Ac e.�q TVoE '�!�'� ..-__."_l'�+1c ___Ca.oc.� - __-._�t�2sr. _-@ ----Std+►. __l5-to To _Z3�+0----._-_--- ._—__.--�7.�ttJ ---�g64�• _-�1--_...Ta .---\S __ _�.QPR.oX_•-----��-aC.Q�°!. . ------- _�___�QV6.__..__Z��TC7G+.'T__�\�_-__."Ta _.-__.COV"J44+.+GT---a__-_.� p►G.R6 ..-_-�.., --. _rAriM _ .___G04F.__ .- .CO uCi SG -� _..LSNT---�•�bT ------- oQ. CCZ�P.-rte A��•j l�CCtTlo+.l+�.c.. �1�odtJts , �tit.asnr� �D2�►•�w�r►.�E Wou L.O �.SO •B�. P.Opr6p 'gyp Z1\rlS �'TbR�B,E ARZ,�q 'F'O� I'\��TPrt �l\�lCt A �Ol�STAnaT (i1A.TL■4 LEJ�, , �• S'CaRAGrrs '�6A, � S ,3 \S 11th Zero \'QST CQ.IT\GA L, �-Tc.T6w�Tl OLl AC�rp, W\rK � �J - - _ �Ka� Ou'tu�s •rro� T\a•\S P�R..E•o S�1cu�.O 8� !-Cco�� \ ' roe. E►. tc�c Staczh \ To - - C NJ-VQ-pc_ t-rs _. ovv F�.o�.� �.t' I►. CCvJ Z KO - - W%LA. 'rat. P.�c.E Ta 10%uLr-dLT KucH of - Z"shm -- T(t-�rrLN ow S - _ "goao _ \ .'T;*Qs ----- - - - 4r--'DP.rc.� was � .cu4•t►cW __ wovup .-_'Pta�s�-r-� - '�� ---- • - --- 'T%6 - -- -- -------- 116------- -------- ---VZ -----e-o,a � _-------_---- --------- ---JU-tiCCtoilJ -----LUATkt ._.__ - - --- -.___SWC^Q gCp� ____�$pp-.__�1cE____Ti'�ipp•-__`Q®�.lQ-_� __�__�Z.__.___.__—.__-- _._---- �_8,_---.www__-�-'�►s.�:�o�.oc..,c.�a --..'°tea .___a._ --�te��s. ----- P. 1 APPENDIX A COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM 1. SUMMARY A Project Identification 1. Project Name Highland Acres 2. Project Proponent The Fafard Companies Address 290 Eliot St. , Ashland. MA B. Project Description:(Clty/fown(s) Salem 1. location within city/town or street address Highland Avenue 2. Est.Commencement Data Summer 1983 Eat.Completion Date: 1988 Approx.Cost f__ 67 Million Current Status of Project Design: 15 B Complete C. Narrative Summary of Project Describe project and give a description of thegemral project boundaries and the present use of the project area.(H necessary.use back of this page to complete summary). The proposed project consists of industrial, commercial and residential develop— ment on a 138 acre undeveloped site in Salem. The project will include 45,000 -SF of commercial space; 305,000 SF of industrial space; and 750 condominiums grouped in four— , plea unite. In addition, 9 holes will be added to the Highland Park municipal golf course. Access to the project will be mainly from Highland Avenue. Other access roads will intersect Swampscott Road and Willson Road. Commercial space abuts Highland Avenue, with industrial space behind it. The residential units will be located behind the industrial space, abutting the golf course. Development is planned to adhere to existing land contours as much as possible. A retention pond will collect site drainage, and serve as an aesthetic amenity. Copies of this may be obtained from: Name. Margaret Briggs "ne. Address:- 255 Bear Hill Rd. , Waltham. MA pjpae No. 990-6933 iS79 TMS IS AN IMPORTANT NOTICE COMMENT PERIOD IS 1.IMI7'ED. -- for Information.cal (617) 727-SM P. 2 Use This Page to Complete Narrative, If necessary. j I jl I I I j' fl This project is one which Is categorically included and therefore automatically requires preparation of an Envbrontnentel Impact Report-YES % NO I O. Scoping(Complete Sections 11 and RI first,before completing this section.) L Check those areas which would be Important to examine in the event that an EIR Is required for this project This Information Is important so that significant areas of concern can be identified as early as possible, in order to expedite analysis and review. Consrruc• Long Construe Long tion Term tion Term Impacts impacts Impacts Impacts Open Spam tit Recrsatfon... .... --K--Mineral Resources......... .... HktwkW Archaeological at ical ............... �_WaterSupply&Use....... ..... Flaherty&Wildlik............ Weter Pollution ............ ... Vegetation Trees.............. _Air Pollution.................. ........_........ Oth r Blologieal Systeme ....... >tu,ra....... . % ..... ...... ... lalandWettands............... % % ttafac.................. ..... 8 B Coastal Wetlands or Beaches .... %lid Waste .................. FloodHasardAreas............ Aesthetics ................... Chemicals.Hasardous Substances. Wind and Shadow ............. High Rkiic Operatlau....... X _ Growth Impacts............... Goobgleally Unstable Area..... Community/Housing and the Buil Agricultural Land ............... Environment. ............. Other(Spseffy) lL List the alernadves which you would consider to be feasible in the event an EIR is required. The No—Build alternative is the only one that vould be considered. y _, f P.3 E. Has this project been filed with EOEA before? Yes No X UYa.EOEANo. EOEAAction? F. Does this project fall under the Jurisdiction of NEPA? Yes No X_ If Yes,which Federal Agency? NEPA Status? G. U$t the State or Federal agencies from which permits will be sought Agency Name Type of Permit MDPW Curb—cut DWPC Sewer Extension State Legislative Approval Land Swap i H. Will an Order of Conditions be required under the q provisions ottheWetlandsProtectionAct(Chap.131,Section 40)? Ya_X No DEQE File No.,if applicable: 1. Ust the agencies from which the proponent will seek financial assistance for this project I j Agency Name Funding Amount EOTC Public Works and $500,000 Economic Development Grant (Pursued by the City of Salem) 1L . PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Include an original 8%x11 Inch or larger section of the most recent U.S.G.S. 1:24,000 scale topogrephk map with the project area location and boundaries dearly shown.include multiple maps U necessary(or large prof. sets.Include other map$, diagrams or aerial photos If the project cannot be dearly shown at U.S.GS.sed& V available,attach a plan sketch of the proposed project, S. State total area of project 138 acres I. Estimate the number of aces(to the nearest I/lo acre)directly affected that are currently. L Open Spaee/WooandV s/Recreation acres L Coastal Area •.•.• --aces dl S. Wetlands............ .......... S sca 6. Productive Resources .—ecru eca Ili Agriculture .................. forestry .................... __acres Mineral Products ............. —ecru C. Provide the following dimensions.U applicable length in mffa Number of Ho ExIstlng Immediate Incase Due to Project 2.375 Number of Parking Spaces...........................UNb 750 Number of - 0 _ Vehicle Trips to Projset Site(swags daily tral k)......... 0 5,725 , D. �Estimated Vehkk Trips past project sk ,...e..($1.M�. 2681 642 *See Note !1 the Proposed project will require any permit for access to tical or Mate bloways, please atter h a sketch showing the location of the proposed driveway(s)In relator to the highway and to the genard development pift h/ethtltying all iocd and state highways abutting the drMopment qts:and the number of lease,paw MM yldtt,median strips and adjacent driveways on each abutting highway;wW indlcetng its distarroe la the Hearst fMerwetlon i' P.4 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Instructions:Consider direct and indirect adverse Impacts•including those arising from general construction and operations. For every answer explain why significant adverse impact Is considered likely or unlikely to result. Also,state the source of Information or other basis for the answers supplied.If the source of the Information, In part or in full,is not listed In the ENF,the preparing officer will be assumed to be the source of the information. Such environmental information should be acquired at least in part by field Inspection. A. Open Space and Recreation 1. Might the project affect the condition,use or access to any open space and/or recreation area? .Ys % No Explanation and Source: The project site is currently undeveloped open space. In its current condition, the site has relatively little recreational value. As part of the proposed project, the proponent plans to build an additional 9 holes on the public Highland Park Golf Course abutting the site. This aspect of the project will improve the recreational value of currently undeveloped land. The overall impact of this project on open space and recreation will be positive. i„ Source: The Fafard Companies. it I B. Historic Resources 1. Might any site or structure of historic significance be affected by the project? Yes No % Explanation and Source; There are no buildings of historic significance on or near the proposed site. Source: Mass. Historical Commission. L Might any archaeological site be affected by the projm? Yes % No II II Ejwlanadon and Sourer li it The Massachusetts Historical Commission archeological site number 19—ES-490 is II!I partially on the project site. III;. Source: Mass. Historical Commission. I C. Ecological Effects 1. Might the project sfgnllicantly affect fisheries or wildlife,especially lls? II;i!I Ys No�_ any rare or endangered species? ! Espfanadon and Source: . j !!il The existing habitat for small animals and birds in a semi—urban environment will be somewhat reduced by this project. There are no significant waterbodies on the site fill that would be suitable for fishery production. There are no rare or endangered animal I ;Special in the area that would be affected -by this project. 8ouresr lZogsr Hog , O.S. Fish i Gane Service. anI; P.S 2. Might the project significantly affect vegetation,especially any rare or endangered species of plant? Yes Nom_ (Estimate approximate number of mature trees to be removed: ) Exotonation and Source: Since the site is currently undeveloped, a certain amount of vegetation will be removed during development. It is The Fafard Companies' policy to retain as much existing vegetation as possible, especially large trees, for aesthetic and landscaping purposes. There are no known rare or endangered plant species in the area. Source: The Fafard Companies; Roger Bogan, U.S. Fish 6 Wildlife Service. 3. Might the project alter or affect good hazard arew inland or cowtat wetlands(e.g.,estuaries.marshes,sand dunes and beaches,ponds,dreams.rivers.Ash runs,or shelMsh beds)? Yes,_ No Explanation and Source: The project site does contain certain areas of inland wetlands. These areas have been mapped by the City of Salem. In several areas, Fafard has agreed to exchange land wanted by Salem for conservation purposes for other, less critical, parcels. Fafard haslanned p the project to minimize impacts on wetland areas. A drainage channel and retention pond are included in the site plan. Source: The Fafard Companies; Susan Madison, Salem Conservation Commission. 4. ro Might the project affect 9 P j shoreline erosion or aeeMlm at the project site. downstream or is nearby wastes) areas? Yes No X Explanation and Source. The project site is well inland and not near any major water bodies or waterways. There will be no a--fact on shoreline erosion or accretion. h'. r: !G Might the project involve other geoloilically unetabht groes? yes No E , Explanation and Sowca � The U.S. Geological Survey places Sales, and most of Southern New England, in an area of seismic risk. The proposed site is no different from others in the region in this respect. 1� Source: U.S. Geological Survey. y D. Hazardous Substances 1. Might ON project involve dee use, tr an$POKadOA' °~' or dioposai of potentially hazardous substance? y> Yes S No Esplo adon and Source: During construction, a certain amount of blasting will be required. This will be ¢one io cospliance with all regulations governing such activities. During operation of the,projset, no use, storage, transportation, release or disposal of hazardous wastes are anticipated. _ .Sources -The lafard 'Otimpsnite. P.6 E Resource Conservation and Use L Might the project affect or eliminate land suitable for agricultural or forestry production? Ya No X_ (Describe any present agricultural land use and farm units affected.) Explanation and Source: The site is not suitable for agricultural or forestry production due poor soils and large expanses of ledge and bare bedrock. In addition, the site is surrounded .by commercial uses which are incompatible with farming and forestry uses on the parcel. Source: Salem Conservation Commission. L Might the project directly affect the potential use or extraction of mineral or energy resources (e.g.,oil, coal, sand&gravel,ora)? Yes No_ X_ Explanation and Source. There are no energy or mineral resources on the site. Source: Salem Planning Department. S. Might the operation of the project result in any Increased consumption of energy? Yes _I No Explanation and Source: The new buildings proposed will use natural gas for heating, hot water, and domestic cooking. In addition, electricity will be used in all buildings. All buildings will be constructed to minimize energy requirements. Residential units will Include greenhouse windows on South facing units, and all units will be well insulated. Commercial and industrial buildings will also use passive solar !mating where possible, and maximum insulation. Source: The Pafard Companies. . F. Water Quality and Quantity 1. Might the project reach in sigsiBcant changes In drainage patterns? Yss No_ I EVIonation and Source: The project is designed to fit the development to the land. Existing contours will be maintained as much as possible. A drainage channel and retention pond will be Included in the project to mitigate stormwater impacts, as well as to provide an aesthetic amenity. Since these features will follow existing land contours, drainage patterns will remain largely unchanged. Source: The Pafard Companies. L Might the project result in the ltarodtwdos of pollutants into any of the W6w hW (a) Marine waters .................................................. Yes No % N) Surface Fresh Water Body Yes— No X Io) Ground Water............. ...................................... Yee No % EvIdn types and Quenwes q/pofhdanb All project drainage will enter the Salem municipal sewer system serving the site. This is a combined storm/sanitary sewer which serves the towns of Salem, Peabody, Danvers and Beverly. Sewage flgws to the treatment plant `in'Salem. Bare it raceives primary, treatment before it is discharged into the oceane Eotetee: lir. TORY ndt9ber, -Sales 'City >i inesr. m P.7 S.Will the project generate sanitary sewage? Yes X No If Yes,Quantity: 350,000 gallons per day Disposal by:.(a) Onsite septic systems ... ..... . . ... ..... . .. .. ... . ... . . .. . Yes No X (b) Public sewerage systems.. .. .. .... .... .. ..... .. ... . . ... . Yes X No (c) Other means(describe) There is more than adequate capacity to handle additional sewage demand. The treatment plant is about 6 million GPD below capacity. The Highland Park area was permitted for 1.3 million GPD of sewage flow about 10 years ago, but the permit was never fully used. Source: Mr. Tony Fletcher, Salem City Engineer. 4. Might the project result In an Increase In paved or Impervious surface over an aquifer recognized as an Impor- tant present or future source of water supply? Yes No X Explanadon and Source: The site is not an important aquifer or ground water supply. Source: Mr. Tony Fletcher, Salem City Engineer; . Susan Madison, Salem Conservation Commission. S. Is the project in the watershed of any surface enter body used as a drinking water supply? Ya No_g Are there any public or private drinking water wells within a 1/2-mile radius of the proposed project? Ya x_ No Explanation and Source: There are no surface drinking water sources in the same watershed as the site. Thompson's Meadow, which is within 1/2-mile of the project, serves as a secondary water source for the Town of Marblehead. This source has never been used. although wells are installed. Source: Salem Conservation Commission. 6. Might the operation of the Project result In arty Increased consumption of water? Yes " No Approximate consumption 350.000gallons per day.Lhdy water soura(s) Wenham Lake Explanation and source: The City of Salem gets its water from Wenham Lake, which is fed by the Ipswich River. There is no shortage of water. Meeting the projected 350,000 GPD for the project should be no problem. Source: Ton Fletcher,, Balem City Engineer. 7. Does the project involve any dredging? les No Y_ NYes.indlcatet Quantity of material to be dredged Quality of matalal to be dredged Proposed method of dredging Proposed disposal sites Proposed season ofyearllor dredging Explanation and Source: This project will not involve any dredging. Evacuation will be required to develop the retention pond. ,flomtrt:etr, The Fafsrd Companies. r P. 8 G..Air Quality I. Might the project affect the air quality in the project area or the immediately adjacent area? Yes No_X Describe type and source of any pollution emission from the project site. No significant air quality impacts are expected as a result of this project. During construction, short-term fugitive dust emissions will be controlled with standard construction procedures. An increase in local traffic will result from the project, but traffic-related pollutants are not expected to create significant impacts to air quality in the vicinity. Source: HATH Associates. 2. Are there any sensitive receptors(e.g., hospitals,schools, residential areas)which would be affected by any pollution emissions caused by the project,including construction dust? Yes % No Explanation and Source: Salem High School is located at the corner of Highland Avenue and Willson Street. The Salem Hospital is located approximately 1/2 mile northeast of the project site on Highland Avenue. The project site abuts the Highland Park Golf Course. Source: KHM Associates. S. Will access to the project area be primarily by automobile? Yes % No Describe any special provisions now planned for pedestrian access,carpooling,buses and other mass transit. Although access to the proposed project will be primarily by automobile, public transportation is available. NBTA Bus Route #450 runs on Highland Avenue between downtown Salem, through Lynn, and downtown Boston. Scheduled bus trips are made frequently on weekdays, and on a more limited basis on holidays and weekends. Source: Salem Planning Department. H. Noses 1. Might the project result in the generation of noise? Ya I_ No The proposed site consists mainly of rock ledge. A significant amount of drilling and blasting will be required during construction. No significant noise impacts are expected once the project is completed. Traffic levels on Highland Avenue are already high, and the incremental project related traffic should not add noticeably to existing noise levels. Traffic passing through the golf course trill be limited to passenger cars associated with the residential development. Peak noise associated with this traffic, assuming up to 20% of residents use this route during the peak hour, will be about 51 dBA. This should not present a significant impact. Source: MOI Associates. L Are there any sensitive receptors(e.g. hospitak,schools, residential areas)which would be affected by any noise caused by the project? Ya - No FXp :lonatfon and Source: . Ealem Rig h School is located at the corner of Hig hland Avenue and Willion Street. ?ltd glee Hospital Is located approximately 1/2 mile northeast of the project site on ;Highland Avenue. the projsct abuts, and traverses, the Highland Park Golf Course. Sources ` ' ME Associates. r P.9 1. • Solid Waste I. Might the project generate solid waste? Ys_B_ No Explanation and Source: (Estimate types and approximate amounts of waste materials generated, e.g., industrial,domestic, hospital, sewage sludge,construction debris from demolished structures.) During construction, some solid waste will be generated from earth work. This will be limited as much as possible. No buildings will be demolished. During operation, industrial, commercial and residential wastes will be generated. It is anticipated that trash will be collected by the City of Salem on major routes through the project, and by private contractors on private ways. Source: The Fafard Companies. J. Aesthetics 1. Might the project cause a change in the visual character of the project area or Its environs? Ys X No The project site is currently undeveloped. Thus, the new development will alter the visual character of the land. However, the change should not be negative. The project calls for fitting the development to the land. Trees and other vegetation will be maintained as much as possible. The project will not alter the character of the site's environs, which are largely developed for industrial, commercial and residential uses. Source': The Fafard Companies. L Are there any Proposed structures which might be considered incompatible wish existing adjacent structure In the vicinity In terms of sim physical proportion and scale,or significant dlHerencs in land use? Ys No_Y Explanation and Saw= The proposed project is the same scale and land-use as the surrounding area. Source: The Fafard Companies; H14! Associates. .1. MlgM the project i®pair visual atxas to watabont or other scenic areas? Ys No T _ Explanation and Source There are no scenic views which would be impaired by this project. Source: HMH Associates. j K Whtd and Shadow 1. Alight the project cause wind and shadow hispaeb on adjacent prop ertis? Ys No E Explanation and Source: building heights in this project are generally 3 stories or so. Buildings will be shorter than trees. There are no wind or shadow impacts expected as a result of this . project. Sources ti?Q1 Associates. x _ . P. 10 � N. CONSISTENCY WITH PRFSENT PLANNING A. Describe any known conflicts or Inconsistencies with current federal, state and local land use, transportation, Open space,recreation and environmental plans end policies. Consult with local or regional planning authorities where appropriate. There are no known conflicts between the proposed project and local plans for the area. The Fafard Companies have consulted with the Salem Planning Board, Conservation Commission, Park Commission, and Department of Public Works. Members of these agencies are working with Fafard to obtain state funds and transfer land to facilitate the project. It Is expected that environmental issues associated with transportation, wetlands and recreational uses can be satisfactorily addressed through project planning. Source: The Fafard Companies. V. FINDINGS AND CERTIFICATION A. The notice of Intent to fIle thle form has bmVwM be published in the following newspaper(s): (Kam) Salem Evening News (Date) November 24, 1982 i B, TWs form has been circulated to all e0endea and persons as required by Appendix& ZZ v5eu $Z Wp Dene Signature of Responsible Of&& hop 7.40 E. T Name(print or type) Z Oe 43uua meY $t, Address Aad ►sae Fie. on1'ta �L'L• d8l- tree J I�I Tdephtse►s NumberL Signatu emu �'z�t 'c ZQ x. -",P 1 ENF Of diffete4t from above) i 41srttaret ftm(pont or type I@iR Associates, Inc r N� rt4e�oaa h Note AM and PM traffic counts were taken at the intersection of Marlboro Street and Highland Avenue on November 17 and 18, 1982. The peak hour of traffic is from 4:30 to 5:30 PM, when a total of 2,681 vehicles pass through this intersection. The increase due to the project has been roughly estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and conservatively assuming that 100% of commercial and industrial users, and 50% of residents, use this intersection. I , { t, • U% C,1 - 1 �' a \� 1 Ce Maly �, Vv Q t 11 � ♦ Arror,o lei ��'! � TI � p} .i , • �'� "aP, • ,.� � i'Y J/ ��rt:. _ ��A- , . iso J�, ��ti�e,� �` �l \,'.' � {A�;, H, � ,Y• 4�r�t •[NOSflo \ f l l y4 0 fit 1 L2 I CSR. o \� , xe�$Y•. c o \ / ` '..ti� 0 Trall < i* RF � Y, w Sou • o 20.\� x f it-1� ,• la ! C `` ` '(, ! 7 F j \\ . oal. °M t' •r— H 1 f� f1 � ,\ � f .. T la ` tlaC�\..�t�. o Ce � rc� -� y BM t _ ,R 1 t Aispir' r ./ /� •1'</ \ �.— . 1 _ o I & may` '�._© DriLY. o r, \..^ 1 • arou �•�1 (,�% �•�' t• \ ABR n h MAO 1 ` 11 ,' 1 b //�, I.J�J % I t•r p ,1, \ " �� 32 II Y OU il! % to ,M II i li . 1 \.. i' (� • _ `1 � m4 .# I Lon A11f1r 1' \l ',I ,co meT IrB>�• - / U timer tq. ,�2f I • � IfiQl 1,2 . i � •��••...3.� rl sOs•� ty or Q`l ' 4 ?4..' �.II FTRwgf y�, _ter Y \ ark. I t�'q`'•fit• (I,r•- ei'�.. �, PI, -, l�'� i(e\ t /t Si Jll YAr 1 .• I(i Ir � A ` -:y'I i .; � I.�� tt t t. � \I I �. i 1 � y — ,c� Q. •, /.y IIo � ,�.�� • gar�Z •,f% � e Cy � `-'"s, _ 7A_i - ✓ � .f��dtt TA �Mcadrnu' �• = r Le 1i•., KEY at2xl• �r1!? Site boundaries em r l Co ! [ '.r O Proposed roadways C - Commercial area I - "Wustrial area ) E - Residential area i ,I i F; i - i - II Co ,,gyp13 Q o a .e� 44) Cosaf �-c -- - ' OUoo�a� U i ii C6VD ( rVt ,2t1R fc v p4-k hmudf-o E/� I� C i! ;� - � . - ��- II i. -- I, �� II -- i I! - -- �� i. �� - �; �� .I I �� i �� i /-P8 tiD - a f y ,: T ,. �� - :, L ,i i �I - �i i� - -- �I i i -- I' I I -- li �I i� i! it �� -- i� - ' ___ -_ � _I _- - I, - _ _ 0 I i - -- i, i 'E 1 - - i - I I _ i - p - I1 - 0 - if -- LAW OFFICES .JOHN R. SERAFINI � . 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI, JR. 744-0212 JOHN F. SADOSNI AREA CODE 617 RECEIVE` March 29, 1983 MNK 3 1. 1983 SALEM F11W ill'dG CEPT. Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Attention: Mr. Philip D. Moran, Chairman Dear Mr. Moran: The enclosed letter is sent to you in connection with the filing by Fafard Company/Ledgemere Corporation of their plans relative to Highland Avenue together with a Notice of Intent. We have been working with the existing regulations under Chapter 131, Section 40. We are aware that as of April 1, 1983, there will be new rules and regulations. Since our work product thus far is the result of many months of working with the existing law, we feel it imperative that we file prior to the April 1st deadline. Recognizing, however, the complexity of our proposed development, we agree in advance to extend the dates of any required hearings or proceedings so as to give both the Commission and ourselves a chance to refine our plans in accord- ance with engineering consultation with the City and members of the Commission. We will accordingly agree to waive the twenty-one day requirement for a hearing and subsequent issuance of any Order of Conditions. This proceeding can commence and conclude at a time to be agreed upon between the parties. I have discussed this procedure with counsel for DEQE, who agreed that it would be a sound and practical approach. Very truly rs, JOHN R SERAFINI, Attorney r F(bfard 6ompany/Ledgemere orporation JRS/cac V/ cc: Richard W. Stafford, Esquire :ON Cp�l,, JZ C"iservation Commission V , Salem. Massachusetts 01970 4fASSnca DEQE File Yi 64-92 Date: 10/10/84 PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: The Fafard Companies Address: 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 01721 Phone: 881-1600 Location of Property: Highland Ave. , Swampscott Rd. , First St. Project Description: _ Planned Unit Development I. Type of Action: DEQE Order of Conditions resulting from appeal. Determination of Applicability _ Modification of Order Notice of Intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance s II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: XXX Public or private water supply XXX Ground water supply XXX Storm damage prevention Prevention of pollution _ Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: XXX Bank Ocean XXX Fresh water wetland Estuary _ Coastal wetland XXX Creek _ Beach XXX River _ Dune bordering on: XXX Stream _ Flat XXX Pond XXX Marsh _ Lake XXX Swamp Land under any of the water bodies listed above Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage ' Land subject to flooding IV. Comments : V. Proposed conditions: Conservation Aide Date XXX Land under any of the water bodies listed above Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage XXX Land subject to flooding IV. Comments : The Commission received DEQE's Order of Conditions for the Fafard project. They are attached. Please review them in your spare time and inform me by Monday, October 15 if you wish to appeal them. Ina meeting with the Deputy General of DEQE on Tuesday October 9, 1984, DEQE required that Fafard's plans be further highlighted to show wetland areas more clearly. They also required site by site definitive plan review by DEQE. This can be simply done by forwarding Planning Board Wetlands permit applications to the DEQE Woburn office. V. Proposed conditions: 1 JJ Conservation Aide (0/��7f�4-- Date 'I %ON Cp(f - ? Conservatim -i - z �J , Salem. Massachusetts 01970 '^fA SSl��;• DEQE File Date: PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: Address: Phone: Location of Property: Project Description: I. Type of Action: Determination of Applicability Modification of Order Notice of Intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: Public or private water supply Ground water supply Storm damage prevention Prevention of pollution Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: Bank Ocean _ Fresh water wetland _ Estuary _ Coastal wetland _ Creek _ Beach _ River _ Dune bordering on: Stream _ Flat _ Pond _ Marsh Lake Swamp ..$101' C['b T� Salem. Massachusetts 01970 f. „W October 12, 1984 Mr. Walter B. Power, III, Chairman Salem Planning Board One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 RE: . WETLANDS SPECIAL PERMIT--FAFARD RESIDENTIAL PARCELS ON FIRST STREET Dear Walter: The Conservation Commission has reviewed the plans for the two parcels on First Street which will be the subject of a public hearing to be held by the Planning Board on October 18, 1984. The Commission concurs with the proposed plans for Parcel 1 with the fol- lowing additional conditions: 1. A rip-rap energy dissipator shall be installed at the outlet end of the 21" drain where it re-enters the brook. 2. The hydraulic adequacy of the drain shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. For both parcels, the Conservation Commission would recommend that copies of all plans and narratives required by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering be forwarded to the Planning Board for their records. The Order of Conditions prepared by DEQE for the entire Fafard project requires R erosion control plans and a request for wetlands replication narrative. These documents would be valuable to the Planning Board and other City agencies in their continued deliberations on this project. Please feel free to contact me if any further information is required. Sincerely yours, Philip D. Moran Chairman dey cc City Engineer Ron Tiberi - ANTHONY D. CORTESE, Sc. D. � A6d, Moakt&02/08 Commissioner WILLARD R. POPE a��Jeixe!`aL�°uizeeL �eL 292=5568 General Counsel . Mr . William T . McDonough October 9 , 1984 The Fafard Companies , Inc . 290 Eliot Street RE : SALEM Wetlands File 464-92 Ashland , Massachusetts 01721 (Fafard Co ,) Docket #84-27 Dear Bill : Thank you for coming to the Boston offices of DEQE today to discuss the additional information to be provided on DEQE Wetlands file #64-92 . This letter is written to confirm the items we dis- cussed and to ensure that we all agree on these items. First, Fafard Companies will forward a toned copy of the four plans which show existing wetlands , areas to be filled , and areas of replacement wetlands in clear delineations . The existing con- tours in the fill and replacement areas should be clearly shown , as well as the proposed contours in and around these areas after work is done . It is important to develop the proposed contours to ensure that the slopes around the replacement areas are built to accomodate the new elevations without erosion. Again, thank you for agreeing to produce a single plan on a reduced scale which shows the entire project . The second item to be developed on the revised plans is an erosion and sedimentation control plan for the road construction and wetlands modifications . Please indicate where siltation bar- riers wi 1 be ocated for areas of road construction and wetlands alteration which will affect the remaining wetland areas . As we agreed, it is crucial to prevent sedimentation of the wetlands , since they will lose their value if silt fills them in. Third, you agreed to develop detailed eros»n c—hrol plana for each phase of the project as the phases are brought on line . I understand that the Salem planning board requires a similar plan when the::detailed construction plan for each phase is developed. The same erosion control plan will serve both DEQE and the Board , showing controls based upon the finalized plan for location of the driveways and buildings . RECEIVED a OCT 11 1984 Rns'd. Mr. William McDonough SALEM Wetlands file #64-92 October 9 , 1984 page 2 Fourth, please develop a wetlands replacement narrative which details the steps to be followed in removing an re-establishing wetland areas. - ._Mr. Losinger._of-HMM Associates- indicated that he ._ was familiar with such matters and- understood this request fully. Finally, IrEmind you about two items in the Order . First, the Order is valid for three (3). years, and you should plan on any requests for extensions well in advance. Also, the work will require a Certificate of Compliance (General Condition #11) and thus must conform to all requirements in the Order and all steps set forth in plans and narratives. Once again, thank you for your cooperation in this matter. I find that the Fafard Companies have been quite willing to consider the concerns of the Department in protecting the wetlands resource on your site, and you have continued. to be cooperative in developing the detail necessary to ensure that construction conforms to DEQE requirements. Please forward the requested information and plans to the DEQE Northeast regional office as well as to me by the end of next week, October 19, 1984 . If you have any questions , please contact me. i Very ruly s Y T,3 Barry P Fogel Deputy General Counsel BPF/lmp cc: Charles Losinger, HMM Associates Phil DiPietro, DEQE NE Salem Conservation Commission- .F ;f r _ ----- - -- -- _ � - - -- — 8 .� — 11.11 , m•,r,. r _ , Ir""""�� -- _ _ _ _._. Il� , „ :' , . • _ F N V ION COMMISION • . SALEM CO SER AT , .: 1. I. . ,. , I I" „ , . „ . � . ,: _ . . o _ I '; _ - :: . : 08 27 E . S411 II . - 00 _ I 4 20. I. r _ " ` I I. I N. , 1 . , :w , . � . I I -rs : � I I I I I I I I 11 I /i I. Cu `, o I , I 11 ro 11 CD Ib I _ 1 h• /� (p , W I _ 1 .' "...1 I , : - { C „ I 1 i { Z . \1 , � I . I 1 .. -,: n „ , , - .:. M N A I N OMMI ION o SALE CONSERVATION T O C S . A � _ co I - ; , m ,. , . _ . W . - , • HIGHLAND REALTY TRUST. _ . o I �n HIGHLAND REALTY TRUST _, p O { o �n cn HIGHLAND PARK ca z o , � i , . o . o, . .p : - � I ` , . _ 4 . - :- , : ', 0) 1, o . rn o _ o - - ,. - ' . - E R-250.00 N. 34 ,� _ 1 . . l� _ 00 - W `' , L 28:98 , „ „ 36 2 t ; 1. 636E ( 70: 0 7 -44:00 o , :. =6 3000 , ;. L 3.03 o , t,,,., c -40.20 . � :' ., :� OD . - t 11(lo: : .. r.,.- : : �.. _ Qo o a EASEMENT AREA 15.852N 37 35 - 35rt.:z, : I ': . .:. : - TRADER Sl�� Y 1 - I --=.- Hq L ERS „ - . ,. _. .. , - , ,. 4 , , < 17p, o „ R. -� 2 00 .,; _ 5:.'.36 .-�26,-36. . ". m � _ 8 . I S 370-35'-35" E .00. � — W _1 N , . N -P I, Co . = R 30.00 . 2 3 f , I ( ; 9 �.. - : L - 51.51 .O �� 2g p , . 3 ` T 34.74 _ . 980-22'-28" . . � _� , . d S 39 44 08 E S 38 53 II E S39 .24 35 :;E 1 . 10.6 2 210.09 I69.69 L 4, _ . - I o GO , , o ', _ . - _. �- -� . ., . �� ' . m I . 1. . co, s o ." '. 1 • . s • - - o F o �, CERTIFY THAT ,THIS PLAN IHAS BEEN PREPARED o . co I 11 IN CONFORMITY• WITH THE RULES `AND REGULATIONS -? I _ F, ,R E ,R 0 THE EGISTE .Sa OF DEEDS OF THE COMM. OF ' MA ? , ", C. .A - -; I - . - -. ,' ,-t MA'.,t.. ; , h, u, - _. N• 4. �'_"'tee 7 1 I.. i , f.. 1 I.. ( '. �'tVT'.0 COE .. - .. ',:. �r3z EASEMENT PLAN� ,. G � -r .. _ _ C/ C .. -... � � . _ .., _ r— .t 1. o ;, r -. :: __-- . , _ S � EiU'1 t4 , I , . . > ' sr - : I 1, r I . PLANNED U-N } T DEVE .._ _ , _ I u w 1� . o .. - 1 , m I ' SALEM } �, , 11: . SCALE I 40 DATE OCT. . 9 - .r' r.` P ;; . 11 3 O T tr . `. S He u C � .. . 1 . _ T i- O c c ,_ l I R, O c _ C S .. ,a , z� . _. „ _ -- rn _ . i F , 9 , 3 I .. O :. - . _ . _ _ , is _._�.:___.-_. __»__ ' , _ S O , / 1 v, O 3 n-f - i ) .. Ate. I »�.r+f..M , , 'a ,, ,, , f -� -------------J.--- J- - ---.., -----`I----- ----I----,-.-----.-- ---------.-,.--"-, ----I.----- --- I fi . _ • ,. "`. f C :1 ' ko k z Connervatim Ckmimission Salem. Massachusetts 01970 ft�41ASS��y - DEQE File li 64-92 Date: 10/10/84 PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: The Fafard Companies Address: 290 Eliot Street, Ashland, MA 01721 Phone: 881-1600 Location of Property: First Street Project Description: Condominium development on two parcels on First Street I. Type of Action: Planning Board Wetlands Permit Review Determination of Applicability _ Modification of Order Notice of Intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: XXX Public or private water supply XXX Ground water supply XXX Storm damage prevention XXX Prevention of pollution Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: XXX Bank _ Ocean XXX Fresh water wetland Estuary _ Coastal wetland XX Creek _ Beach —. River _ Dune bordering on: XXX Stream _ Flat XXX Pond XXX Marsh _ Lake XXX Swamp Land under any of the water bodies listed above . Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage Land subject to flooding IV. Comments : V. Proposed conditions: . . Conservation Aide Date I XXX Land under any of the water bodies listed above Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage XXX Land subject to flooding IV. Comments : The Planning Board as part of its Special Permit process has asked the Commission to comment on this project with regards to the adjacent wetlands. Although DEQE has issued an Order of Conditions for the project, ConCom can request that the Planning Board add further conditions to the project if they desire. V. Proposed conditions: u e CConservation Aide October 10 1984 Date .`.AVON CptJ, ° im Commissim Z Salem. Massachusetts 01970 F e ASS NCDEQE File Date: PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: Address: Phone : Location of Property: Project Description: I. Type of Action: Determination of Applicability _ Modification of Order Notice of Intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: Public or private water supply Ground water supply Storm damage prevention Prevention of pollution Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: _ Bank _ Ocean _ Fresh water wetland _ Estuary _ Coastal wetland Creek _ Beach _ River _ Dune bordering on: Stream _ Flat _ Pond Marsh Lake Swamp 'tu of \\ @nr Salm Guru REQUEST FOR :'_ COUNTS SPEC L°L P=El DATE: September 26, 1984 TO: __ilding InsgzctorConservation Cc=aission ( } City Engineer ( ) Other: =:card of Health Attac_—f -�-aase find the application r==enced below. The Planning Board requests `tet you review this zpplicat ^ relative to Section VII of the Zonin. C=_=nce. We would appreciate . •_r completing the form below and -' retur it to us. Notice of the pub4iz hearing for this application will be fo--= to you. ( XX) WETLANDS & FLOOD 171= 1 DISTRICTS ( ) CLUSTER DEVELOP'-�V_ ( ) PL N'NED UNIT D -E_r D-- '�T APPLl '7—. The Fafard Companies PRO.T-: i R ADRESS: Two parcels in the Southeast corner of First Street s a CONTA�" TONS AND PHONE: Gregg WarrenCity: Ashland, MA. 881-1600 CO:fi=7--5 D E BY: October 15 1984 to comment within 35 days s-11 be deemed lack of opposition_) ( } C.-ncur with proposal (Evplaf c= reverse side) more information (Exp-ai= =n reverse side) ( 1 C=ot concur with proposa- (-rain on reverse side) ( } Ca_ents included ct'S SIGNATURE TITLE DATE THE FAFARD COMPANIES 290 Eliot Street / Ashland, MA 01721 617-879-7300 H.A. Fafard and Sons Construction, Inc. Ledgemere Land Corporation Fafard Real Estate Interiors September 20, 1984 Mr. Gerard Kavanaugh City Planner One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Section 5-C Special Permits Procedure Dear Gerry: In Parcel one we are proposing five buildings, two 8-plex containing 16 units, two capes with 4 units each and one deck containing 4 units. This is a total of 28 units containing 56 bedrooms. In Parcel two we are proposing five buildings, two Capes, one Star, one Long Ell and one Short Ell all of which contain 4 units with 2 bedrooms each. ' These proposals were designed such that the post development conditions create the least amount of disturbance in the pre-development flow patterns. Each building has been adapted in order to best utilize the existing contours of the area. All buildings aal�e to be serviced through existing municiple utilities located on Fir_ Street. qGreg( " Salem. Massachusetts 01970 AIASSncDEQE File Ji 64-92 Date: 10/10/84 PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: The Fafard Companies Address: 290 Eliot Street, Ashland MA 01721 Phone : 881-1600 Location of Property: First Street Project Description: Condominium development on two parcels on First Street I. Type of Action: Planning Board Wetlands Permit Review Determination of Applicability _ Modification of Order _ Notice of Intent Extension of Order Abbreviated Notice of Intent Certificate of Compliance s II. Interest(s) in the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40 affected: XXX Public or private water supply XXX Ground water supply XXX Storm damage prevention XXX Prevention of pollution Protection of land containing shellfish Protection of fisheries III. Resource areas subject to protection: XXX Bank Ocean XXX Fresh water wetland Estuary _ Coastal wetland X)(X Creek Beach _ River bordering on: XXX Stream _ Dune _ Flat XXX Pond XXX Marsh _ Lake XXX Swamp f' XXX_ Land under any of the water bodies listed above Land subject to tidal action Land subject to coastal storm flowage XXX Land subject to flooding IV. Comments : The Planning Board as part of its Special Permit process has asked the Commission to comment on this project with regards to the adjacent wetlands. Although DEQE has issued an Order of Conditions for the project, ConCom can request that the Planning Board add further conditions to the project if they desire. V. Proposed conditions: u 0. C ' Conservation Aide October 10, 1984 Date t ifuof � xl�nz �~1�T�S�uhlz��ii� - _ REQUEST FOR y C0-24ENTS SPECL".L Pte= DATE: September 26, 1984 / 0: __ilding Inspector � Conserva_ion Commission ( --ity Engineer ( ) Other: =oard of Health Attac=- find the application r---=--e-.iced below. The Planning Board requests _t you review this applicatic= relative to Section VII of the Zoning __-ce. We would appreciate .= completing the form below and return=z it to us. Notice of the pLD7-ic hearing for this application -will- be illbe fo--==- to you. ( XX) WETL4\ZDS & FLCOD P�7-7 DISTRICTS ( ) CLUSTER DEVELO?' - ( ) PL0N`ED UNIT DF L-C7- -NT APPLI -: The Fafard Companies PROT' _ t _ & ADRESS• Two parcels in the Southeast corner of First Street COHTA' —cO`iS AND PHONE: Gregg Warren City: Ashland, MA. 881-1600 CO?f`r'c - 3Y: October 15 1984 to comment within 35 cat's s11 be deemed lack of opposition.) ( } Ccncur with proposal (EXplai- t= reverse side) ( ) Nee? more information (E-�7p"_ail = reverse side) ( ) C.�=ot concur with proposal (--lain on reverse side) ( } C:_ents included -1'S SIGNATURE TITLE DATE THE FAFARO COMPANIES 290 Eliot Street / Ashland, MA 01721 617-879-7300 H . Fafard and Sons Construction, Inc. Ledaemere Land Corporation Fafard Real Estate Interiors September 20, 1984 Mr. Gerard Kavanaugh City Planner One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Section 5-C Special Permits Procedure Dear Gerry: In Parcel one we are proposing five buildings, two 8-plex containing 16 units, two capes with 4 units each and one deck containing 4 units. This is a total of 28 units containing56 bedrooms. In Parcel two we are proposing five buildings, two Capes, one Star, one Long Ell and one Short Ell all of which contain 4 units with 2 bedrooms each. These proposals were designed such that the post development conditions create the least amount of disturbance in the pre-development flow patterns. i� Each building has been adapted in order to best utilize the existing W4" contours of the area. All buildinge to be serviced through existing municiple utilities located on Firt Street. I ' V y trul ours,', Greg WalIr e 1 I� r " �•• �.CONWTt� IIF MICHAEL E. O'BRIEN CITY OF SALEM CITY SOLICITOR MASSACHUSETTS MARY P. HARRINGTON 93 WASHINGTON STREET ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR and 93 WASHINGTON STREET 187 FEDERAL STREET and SALEM,MA 01970 59 FEDERAL STREET 7464311 SALEM, MA 01970 7443363 7440350 Please Reply to 187 Federal Street Please Reply to 59 Federal Street September 25 , 1984 Charles Frederickson Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re : Fafard Dear Charlie : You have asked whether the City can permit construction of a road on the property given to the City by Highland Realty Trust either by swapping land with Fafard or granting Fafard an easement. After reviewing the deed from Highland Realty Trust to the City, it is my opinion that the City cannot permit such construction . When land is given to a city , it is held in trust subject to any restrictions contained in the grant which must be enforced . In this deed , the following language appears : "The foregoing premises are conveyed to the grantee for conservation purposes . " and : "4 . The granted premises are to be main- tained by the grantee in their natural scenic and open state for the preserva- tion of their value for water resources , scenic and natural beauty within the City of Salem . " Such restrictions preclude any use of the land other than conservation and construction of a paved road for a shopping center would clearly conflict with such conservation restrictions . Charles Frederickson Page 2 September 25 , 1984 As we discussed , I have spoken to John Serafini regarding this matter and advised him of the foregoing. He knows the grantor of thei remises and will ll discuss the possibility with them of waiving the restriction and permitting the construction. Very truly yours , O �`�iyZG MPH: jf Mary Harrington cc : Michael E . O'Brien, Esq . lam! \ BK6 187 PG 19 ! ` :: $c FLAN SEE FL. B./3 J. DEED BARBARA KEELEY,, as' sho is Trustee of Highland Realty Trust, under written Declaration of Trust dated December 21, 1964, filed with Essex . South Registry District of the Land Court as Document No. 116.295 .for $1.00 consideration paid grants to the City of Salem, a municipal corporation having an address at Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts, in said Salem, Essex County, ' with Quitclaim covenants two certain parcels of land, situate in said• Salem and shown as containing 2.34 acres, more or less and 7.8' acres, 'more or less, respectively, on. plan entitled "Plan of Land in Salem, Property of Highland Realty Trust, Scale 1"=1001, dated Julv. 30th, 1975, drawn by Essex Survey Service, Inc. , 47 Federal Street, Salm, Massachusetts" and bounded and described as follows: pARCELA .'. -- : NORTFXASTERLY by-other land of grantee, four hundred eighteen and 29/100 (418.29) feet] coilliir..ASTERLY ' by other land of the grantee twenty-four and 50/100 (24.50) feet; ninety-five and 40/100 (95.40) feet; sixteen and 82/100 (16.82)feet; and two hundred forty- four and 74/100 (244.74) feet; one hundred nine and 12/100 (109.12) feet and forty and 00/100 (40.00) feet; SOu'rIWBSTER.LY by land of the grantor four hundred twenty (420`.00) feet; SOUiij7ASTERLYi by last mentioned land one hundred sixty-four and 63/100 (164.63) feet and one hundred fifty (150.00) feet; 28-98 ft. SOL'^ti?4BSTERLY! . by last mentioned land thirty (30.00) feet; `SOviHF:.ASTERLY .;. by `last mentioned land eighty-nine and 86/100 (89.86) feet; SOUT11WESTERLY by other land of the grantor, one hundred seventy (170.0.0) £eft; I ' 'No RTfTESTERLY !' by the southeasterly line of First Street, fifteen and r '. 19/100 (15.19) feet, one hundred twenty six and: 98/100 (126.98) feet; and three hundred ninety-seven and 83/100 (397.83) feet] I NORTHEASTERLY .by.other 'land of the grantor two hundred (200.00) feet; i r , NORTIMSTr.RLY { by :the. last mentioned land, one hundred fifty-five and , .:•<: .90/100' (155.90) feet; two hundred ninety-nine and 89/100 (299.89) feet] and twenty-one and 30/100 (21.30), feet, as shown on said plan:, _ e z . i! :., BI( 6 87 PG 1 92 PARCEL 13 I NORTHERLY by other land of the grantor, two hundred 'twenty- one and 73/100 (221. 73) feet; . NORTHEASTERLY by land of the New England Power Company, four hundred ninety-two and 72/100 (492. 72) feet; SOUTHEASTERLY by other land of the grantee, one hundred eighty- four (184 .00) feet; and S0UTHWESTERLY by other land of the grantee, rix hundred fort:'- one and 08/100 (641 . 08) feet, as shown on said Plan. The foregoing Premises are conveyed to the grantee for con- servation purposes and said conveyance is subject to the folloa„Ying reservations made on behalf of the grantor, her heirs, successors and assigns, fcr the benefit of the remaining land of said grantor located off Highland Avenue in the said City of Salem. 1. No structure, permanent or temporary, of any kind whatsoever will ever be constructed or maintained upon the granted premises except such buildings as may be in accordance with guidelines established by the Salem Conservation Commission for the use of said parcels for conservation purposes.__ ._: 2. Neither the granted premises 'nor any portion of the grantor' s remaining land within 100 feet of the granted premises s ha 11be used for dumping or maintenance of any refuse, trash or other unsightly or offensive material except with regard to grantor ' s remaining land that, in connection with any ;lawful use thereof, receptacles and containers for the temporary:. ' storage of refuse and trash may be maintained, provided that the same are regularly emptied, maintained and restricted from view by shrubbery, etc. 3. No change shall be made in the topography of the granted / premises, nor shall any earth, rock, loam, sand, or 'other materials h:` removed from the granted premises, nor is hall the surface of the granted premises be disturbed ea' pursuant to guidelines of• the Salem Conservation Commission for land"nd managed by said Commission. 4. The granted premises are to be maintained by the grantee in ' their natural scenic and open state for the preservation of their value for water resources, scenic and natural beauty within the City of Salem. The grantor does Hereby reserve for itself, its successors and assigns, the following rights and easements : A. The .right to drain surface water upon and across the granted premises to accommodate grantor's remaining land, provided that the water drained from the grantor' s remaining land shall be of such quality that the water upon or flowing across the granted premises shall by its quality and potential uses be Classified as Class C as defined in the present Rules and Regulations , for the Establishment of MiniT m later Quality Standards and for the Protection of the Quality and Value of Hater Resources, Commonwealth of rlassachusetts Hater' Resources Co±ranission, Divisio:: of Hater Pollution Control, as now or hereafter in effect. There shall be no obligation on the part of grantor, its successors and assigns, to create any channels or culverts upon the granted premises, r:.\Ccptfor water quality considerations, the .grantor is hereby expressly released from any and all liability for damages to the granted premises due to said surface water drainage whethor or not the volume 2 I • if BK6 187 PG 193 ..Or speed of such drainage shall be increased by anything done by Fjrantor, its successors and assigns , on the Valance of the j grantor' siland or .any land now or hereafter owned by grantor j bounded generally by land of New England Power Company as shown on the aforesaid Plan, land of the City of Salem, Swampscott Road and Highland Avenue:' ; Included' }aithin ,saiddrainage easement shall be land conveyed a on to be conveyed by the grantor to Salex Realty Trust con silting of approximately 13 acres lying Southeasterly of Highland Avenue, being a portion of the premises shown on a ' an of Land in Salem prepared for Highland play. entitled "Pl at.y Trust, .dated July 25 , 1972 , recorded with Essex South Distract Registry of Deeds in Plan Book 124 , Plan 28. " It is agreed that in the event the grantor, her heirs , successors or assigns, wish to install, lay and maintain, repair, replace, i install and relocate underground conduits, pipes, wires and . culverts for the transmission of water, gas , electricity and intelligence , electronically or otherwise upon, i.n or under the - granted Premises, to and from any portion of said benefitted ; approval therefor from the Salem land, iieY shall obtain Prior i that in the event such approval Conservation commission and t P is forthcoming the grantor agrees to reasonably restore any : i lana disturbed by it to the same condition it was in prior to i such installation or repair. C. It is to be clearly understood that no right or casement is - granted by this deed for vehicular access to either of said i ' parcels. All of such access is to be by , through, and over other .land of the City of Salem as shown on said Plan unless and until, 'First Street shall become a public street, provided that the members of said Conservation Commission, their agents, ser- vants and guests may park their vehicles on First Street. proviuea, however, that such rights to park shall be subject to i the rights of, other persons lawfully entitled to use First Street and to repairthe same and in connection with construction i activities therein. i Barbara heeley, as Trustee, does hereby certify that she has received written direction from all of the beneficiaries of the. ' Bighland, Realty Trust to execute and deliver the within deed. EiQiCUTED under seal this l8th day of August, 1975 . i i 1 Barbara Keele;), Tr stee of Highland Realty Trust, and not individually II COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS cUFF OLK,SS: August 18 , 1975 Then personally .appeared the above-named Barbara Keeley, as Trustee of Highland' Realty Trust, and acknowledged the foregoing a n. trwm.�t t o be her free act and dee d, before me D AnAd Gerard D. Goldstein, Notary Public My commission expires : March 8, 1979 I ,an^_ Leing required by law, no documentary stamps are nffixed hereto. I S. RUSSELL SYLVA J)�/5 Gvruna�ar�Reczlflz �2Greruc�Commissioner 160 GCUal..uv2, wliz� 0/ tt Z 01966 January 16 , 1987 �ANi,ING DEP Sy Etn P Ron Killian RE: SALEM - Swampscot Aad Fafard Company Disposition of Stockpiled Soil 290 Elliot Street and Review of Site Assessment Ashland, MA 01721 Report at Fafard Industrial Report Dear Mr. Killian: The purpose of this letter is to formally notify the Fafard Company of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering's determination on the disposition of stockpiled soil at the above mentioned site and also to notify the Fafard Company of deficiencies in the I.E.P. site assessment report as it pertains to the investigation of potential groundwater contamination on and migrating off this site. This letter is intended as a followup to a determination given verbally to Fafard regarding stockpiled soils in December 1985. The need for further groundwater studies has been determined after a review of existing groundwater data supplied to the Department from Fafard. Soil Disposition The Department is in receipt of two report documents developed by I.E.P. Inc. concerning environmental conditions at the subject site. The first document is dated March 1985 and is entitled: 21-E Site Assessment, 58-96 Swampscott Road, Salem, MA. The second document is undated and untitled. , but it summarizes sampling activities and subsequent analytical results of soil samples taken at the Swampscott Road site between the period of July 12, 1985 to August 1, 1985. Data from this report includes analytical results of samples taken from stockpiled soil, the volume of which is estimated at 700 cubic yards, and of samples taken from three test pits located around the perimeter of the excavation where the stockpiled soil was removed. These studies have been voluntarily conducted to determine the possible presence of oil or hazardous materials that could potentially constitute a basis for regulatory action by the Department under the provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 21E. In March, 1985 I.E.P. Inc. completed an environmental investigation of the subject site. During this investigation I.E.P. Inc. identified fifty-55 gallon drums and twenty to thirty 5 gallon containers off an unpaved access road on the site (identified in Site Plan March 1985 report). This was the only area identified by I.E.P. as a "known or suspected waste/wastewater conveyance or disposal area". No inforamtion on further investigations regarding the remainder of the site beyond a visual observation made during a walkover of the site is provided in the I.E.P. report. Ron Killian Page 2 a In the vicinity of the 55 gallon drums I.E.P. dug four test pits, encountering a variety of refuse material including cracked electrical insulators, glass, tires, sheet metal and street materials. Also noted was apparent oil staining and a "heavy oil and grease odor". The presence of volatile organic compounds was also recorded in the test pits utilizing an h-NU meter. Analysis of a soil sample from test pit 4 revealed an 'oil and grease" content of 15, 183 "mg/l". In June 1985 Zecco Inc. excavated and transported from the drum area approximately 728 cubic yards of soil to Narragansett Improvements in Rhode Island. Zecco Inc. also removed the 55 gallon drums and 5 gallon containers for proper disposal. An additional 600-700 cubic yards of soil from the 55 gallon drum area was excavated and stockpiled on-site pending a decision on its final disposition by the Department. The Department subsequently requested that the stockpiled material and remaining soils in the drum area be analyzed for the following: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) , PCBs and EP Toxic Metals. Quantification of contaminants from 8 composite samples taken from the soil stockpile and from three test pits by the above analyses are summarized as follows: PCBs vary in concentration between below 0.8 ug/g to 12.4 ug/g; total VOCs varied between 1 ug/g to 31 ug/g; all EP Toxicity analytical results for samples were below RCRA hazardous waste classification limits listed in the Federal Register, May 19, 1981 part 261.24 subpart C; oil and grease content varied from below 80 ug/g to 4090 ug/g. The Department determined that, although low-level contamination of soils in the drum area had been confirmed, the volume of contaminated soil was extensive and the level of contamination did not warrant bulk removal. Permission to leave this remaining soil was granted provided the following conditions were met: (1) Stockpiled soil and soils remaining in the drum area be covered. with at least 1' of clean fill or with bituminous pavement or any other barrier to prevent human contact or exposure from this material. (2) Should any of this material be moved on-site in the future, it will be similarly covered. Should any of this material be moved off-site it will be manifested and properly disposed of. (3) A notice be placed on the deed of 58-96 Swampscott Road, Salem indicating that this material is on-site. Ron Killian Page 3 (4) If in the future, any surface or excavated soil is encountered that exhibits the characteristics of an oil, hazardous, or otherwise unknown material elsewhere on the site, this office must be notified immediately. The Department's determination in this matter did not limit the response or action we might take with respect to other .sites in the area or response or action we might take regarding this site in the event that further information comes to the attention of the Department. Decisions made on the drum area soil disposition were based upon the information in I.E.P. 's reports and, therefore, should not be relied upon without further review by the Department if the reports has any material omissions or misstatements. Groundwater Groundwater investigation conducted on the site by I.E.P. were limited to the sampling of three shallow piezometers installed in test pit excavations and an assumption on groundwater flow rates and directions based on site topography. No valid conclusion can be made regarding groundwater contamination, flow characterization or the potential for contaminant transport off-site based on this level of investigation. In the undated I.E.P. report it is stated that three test pit piezometers were installed on-site adjacent to the soil excavation area. Based on their method of installation it is questionable whether any samples taken from these piezometer are truly representative of groundwater piezometric or water quality conditions in these locations. It is reported that one sample from these wells contained 250 ug/l of Methylene Chloride, however, interpretation of this result is not given. I.E.P. identified two privately used bedrock wells. in the vicinity of the site. If groundwater contamination is present on-site, further investigations, beyond assumptions based on surface topography, must .be performed to determine what if any hydraulic connection exists between on-site contamination and these private water supply wells. Based upon the I.E.P. Site Assessment Reports, further investigations must be conducted to determine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the subject site. The prevention and or mitigation of a release or a threat of release is governed by Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 21E, the "Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Prevention and Response Act". Information available to the Department indicates that Fafard Co. is liable and a responsible party pursuant to Section 5(a) of Chapter 21E. Ron Killian Page 4. Chapter 21E identifies as responsible .parties the current owner or operator of a site at which there has been a release or threat of release of oil or hazardous material; the past owner or operator of a site where a release of a hazardous material has occurred; any person who directly or indirectly arranged for the transport, disposal, storage or treatment of hazardous materials to or at such a site; and any person who caused or is legally responsible for a release or threat of release of oil or hazardous material at such a site. Such parties are liable without regard to fault; the nature of this liability is joint and several. (M.G.L. Chapter 21E, Section 5 a). _. Requisite Site Actions Further actions to address the potential for groundwater contamination should include the following: (1) The installation of drilled monitoring wells in a manner acceptable to the Department. These wells should be located to identify potential contamination in the former drum area and the migration of any groundwater contamination from this area. (2) Both horizontal and vertical groundwater flow rates should be determined. (3) Groundwater samples should be analyzed for both volatile organic compounds by method 624 and dissolved petroleum constitutents. (4) Based on the results of this investigation, recommendations for groundwater remediation, if warranted, should be submitted to the Department for review. A written response indicating your intentions to comply with the provisions of this letter is requested within 30 days. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, contact Jack Duggan, at the letterhead address or 935-2160. ery truly ours Richard J algin Deputy Reg onal Environmental Engineer RJC/JD/ae cc: DEQE/DSHW, One Winter Street, Boston, MA 02108 Attn: Madeline Snow Salem Conservation Commission, One Salem Green, Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Dale Yale I 18-01 DRAINAGE - RUNOFF- 1 r sae us FIG. A.-ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, FIG B. - ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, FIG. C.-ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 2 YEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 10 YEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN SO YEARS. M1lx.B to ,a A.a" snie 1\ AXI/ .. ^`en'� ' ssy FIG. D.-ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, FIG. ONE-HOUR IN INCHES, FIG. E- ONE-HOUR RAINFALL,IN INCHES, TO-BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 5 HEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCENCE IN IN 25 YEARS. TO BE EXPECTED ONCE IN 100 YEARS. COMPUTATION OF I IN RATIONAL FORMULA. E MGLE:455ume expectancy period =5 yeor4, see fig. D, os5u/ne locolily,find Ihour.intensity-I75in.per hour. FIG.G-INTENSIYY EXPECTATION FOR ONE-HOUR RAINFALL'. Iooa '00 SS 800. T00 600 30 o i sbo D � v cc Pvvcd N o G00 J W I —1 0 ff. 300 t7 Z .n 10 n f. O W O 9 fXAAfpLE:Ojkro:Area-LB acres,orercg.gross W 200 Bere W 20 z O Solace,fonyeal o.rr/andfbw =?00A 90 4%glade- �. 5oil V I m I 8 Ditch flan, =150A cia57g/ark To 11 d [ Z ~Awr6/oas a F W O, Fo^Overland f/oW xe F/0.N of le if =15 Min. Surface Q i O 0 F 7 ,'Or Dilc,Sf/an:assume lrie/0=3efs,eNe- O os 0 Z 5-05,finddileh=D-1,V-1.70,cerjr .. Avec Grass Cf 100 Surface 0 I.o I j5 O �- 6 •-0ilch lime=�� = AS 90 eo 2.0 f �10} Q Conecn/ration time =165 M2 Denee \ zrr FE Plov ? g 70 Gr055 \ s.0 m 'Ai I- r &ier 1.75 Curve from Fia.D O GO' U Z F above, find i-3.8. `J 50 Zp d Z 4 z as = 40 40 0 F- lo 3 4 _ o F Oa t- 30 J W 30 y J 4 Z 20 J' Z Z B o 20 Qcc . 0 71 IO FO 30, 40 50 60 70 BO 90 100 110 120 65Mm. DURATION IN MINUTES - { Concenirofion fimc in fx plc. ID FIG. H- OVERLAND G FIG. J-VALUES OF L - FLO TIME. CcRAINFALL INTENSITY-DURATION Reproduced from Misce A/ eons Fublicofion N/d.?OJ, US. Depf, of 49ricullure, by David L. Yonne//. fiAdepfcd From Eng.'neering Manua/ of fhe Avon beoorfinen>;Por/ M1 C/70,0./'Dec 45. DRAINAGE - RUNOFF- 2 Q =Aci RATIONAL FORMULA (Logical (approach). Q =R UNOFF - Peak dischorye of watershed in cubic fee}per second (C.4s.) due A2 rnoximurn 5l0er7 assrursed. See Fiys.AtoFPg. /Bo/ (!/wa//y /O -25yeorr). A -Arca of wcr1ershed /n acres. C =Coeff%c%ent of runoff, 7ob/eB6e.6w(Measure oflosses due to infiltration, etc.), t =In,/ensify ofrainfa// in /aches perhour based on Concerltrotiers time,see Py.18-01. C017fe17tr97fi017 time=1%roe required forrain Coding almost remote pointto reach discharge OoinJ Gbneentrotion time may inc/u de over/and flow time, Fiy. H, Py.18-01,alwChonne/ t'/ow fine, Pg. /8-05t 18-06, 18-69 and /8-71. TABLE A-COMPUTATION FORM FOR RATIONAL FORMULA. LOCATION A TIME FLOW-MINN. DESIGN PROFILE HAN CAPA- V INV. INV. NEL SLOPE CITY ff. OTHER INCfyE. IN TIME ENGTI FALL ELEV. ELEV. STRep-T, FROM TO MEN OTA TO CHAI4 OF 4. Q OR of l} n FULL Pel' ff. ft. L056E5 DDER LOWS INLE NEL CONC C'£s. PIPE P e.f.s. Sea + END END SIZE I f/R5r Sr. A 8 /.8 /.8 .44,16.510-.3 /65 3.8 30 15" .008 .015 4.6 3.9 60 0.48 o Z.Oo 8152 MA/N RD. B C /.9t3-7 .50 2.5 1 .813.7 1 68 D•2 .011 .030 12-012-6. , 4 20 4.62 0 152 76.90 C j D 2.0 5.7 .50 /.8. 193 3.5 /a 21" .007.015 1 11.1 1 4.5 1480 3.36 2.20 74.70 70.34 'Note that the sequence of design os in a xomple, Fig.J, P9.18-01 invo/ver trio/ assumpf/ons %n daterminin9 !. 'i Fal/ in monho/e. RUN OFP VALUE vAuu6 6v TABLE B - VALUE 5 OF c = RA/N PALL PROPOSED AUTHOR TY SLJ P_ PACES - MIN. MAX MIN. MAH. ROOFS , •y rag f0 me foJ. - 0.90 1.00 0.70 0.95 Concrete ar Asphot}. 0.90 1.00 .0.95 1.00 03 PAVEMENrs Bi}ominous Moaoo�orn open and closed 249,00. 0.70 0.90 0.70 0.90 03 Grove ram c%on o"d./erose. to 0%_e orad cam act. 0.25 0.70 o.15 0.30 Q R.R. YA905 - - 0.10 0.30 0. 10 0.30 Qj SANG, frorir urrifor.n groin size,no fines, Bore 0.15 0.50 o.ol 0.55 to we// graded, some c/ay ors%/t. l% htVe etotlon 0.10 0.40 0.01 o.as Den5e1/e eta/iOn 0.05 0.30 0.01 0.55 ®, LOAM, from Sandy or gravelly to Bo/ - 0.20. O.Go clayey. i ht Ye eta /on o. lo o.45 EARTH Dense Ire elation 0.05 0.35• SURFACES GRAVEL, from cleon gravel an& grave/ Bore 0.25 0.65 Bond mixtures, no si/t or cloy /o high Li h} ✓e e}olion 0.15 0.50 C/a or si/t Content. Dense Ire efotien 0.10 o.4O CLAY, from coarse sandy or silty }o Bore 0.30 0.75 0.10 0.70 pure Co//aido/ clays. Z/7hA Ire elation o.?o •o.Go 0. 10 0.70 ease Ye elation 0.19 o.SO 0 10 0.70 City,business areas. 0.60 0.75 0.60 0.95 aMPOS/TE crt dense residenlia/areas, Vo,- os /o soil and ve efolian. 0.50 0.65 0.30 0.6o Suburban residential areas. -11 •� 0.35- -ass 0.25 F-40 AREAS 0.10 0.25 0,10 3.25 RUra/ D%SIr%CIS porEs, Go/f Courses, etc., 0.10 0.3s 0.05 0. 55 QI No TE: 1/71ues of C for earM salV47CCS ore further Varied by degree of soturo}ion, comPoction, 5u1focc irregu/orjty and s/ooe, by ch oracle'- of subsoil, and by presents of frost or y/ozcd snow or ice. IQ Bryenf it /luichling, Reoort, Bock Boy Sewerage 0151"/ct, Boston, 1909. Qz Metcolf one Eddy, Alner%co17 Sewerage 01-ociice , 1928. A56raw-Hill. Q Used by City of Boston, reported by Me}colf. Eddy. © Used by city of Detroit repdrted by Metco/f3e Eddy. © L. C. Ur9uhort, C%V%I En9ineerir7y /10170"b0ox-, 1940. M` GrAw-Hi/l. HIGHLAND ACRES - SALEM, MA. FfA,1�Aa,,�ct OWNER and "Highland Realty Trust %o ROBERT rP„ PETITIONER The Fafard Companies i E. '•� NASCHI Nq ENG'R and L. S. : 'gobert E. Maschi 9N0.23s E� P �o �CISTEP 'OMALEab ' Iki%*Off Calcs. By "Rational Method" (Q = Aci) V' 1100 = 3.0 inches in one hour 1 50 = 2.6 inches in one hour 1 25 = 2.3 inches in one hour 1.10 = 11..'8 cinches in one hour Pipe Capacities Using: a Design (18-06) Total Water Shed Area 492± Acres aTowable Q Factor on existing drain pipes and culverts are all figured on a 100 year storm to show maximum impact. Total Water Shed Area was divided into 18 seperate sections to determine existing and proposed rune-off conditions. � � V RATIONAL METHOD: Q = Aci = Cu. Ft. per Sec. DRAIN AREA "i" " " AREA IN C 100 Q100 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 5.2 5.2 96 96 2 14± 0.5 0.6 6.5 6.9 48 58 3 18± 0.4 0.7 5.3 6.9 38 100 4 lot 0.4 0.7 6.0 7.0 24 49 5 6± 0.4 0.7 6.0 7.3 14 31 6 10± 0.4 0.6 6.2 6.8 25 41 7 10± 0.3 0.4 5.8 6.0 18 24 8 12± 0.3 0.4 5.8 6.0 21 29 9 16± 0.3 0.5 5.8 6.2 28 50 10 4± 0.3 0.5 6.2 6.5 8 13 11 4± 0.3 0.5 6.0 6.2 8 12 12 12± 0.2 0.5 5.7 6;2 14 37 13 34± 0.2 0.4 5.4 6.0 37 82 14 14± 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.8 22 33 15 20± 0.2 0.2 4.8 4.8 20 20 16 22± 0.2 . 0.2 4,2 4.2 19 19 17 60± 0.2 0.2 4_3 4.3 52 52 18 134± 0.4 0.4 4.8 I '4.8 258 258 TOTAL 492± I 750± 1004± RATIONAL METHOD: DRAIN AREA "i" " " AREA IN "C" 50 450 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP.- EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 4.8 4.8 88.3 88.3 2 14± 0.5 0.6 5.8 6.2 40.6 52.1 3 18± 0.4 0.7 4.8 6.2 34.6 78.1 4 10± 0.4 0.7 5.5 6.3 22.0 44.1 5 6± 0.4 0.7 5.5 6.8 13.2 28.5 6 10± 0.4 0.6 5.7 6.0 22.8 36.0 7 10± 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.5 15.6 22.0 8 12± 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.5 18.7 26.4 9 16± 0.3 0.5 5.2 5.7 25.0 45.6 10 4± 0.3 0.5 5.7 5.8 6.8 11.6 11 4± 0.3 0.5 5.5 5.7 6.6 11.4 12 12± 0.2 0.5 5.0 5.7 12.0 34.2 13 34± 0.2 0.4 4.8 5.5 32.6 74.8 14 14± 0.3 0.4 4.8 5.2 20.2 29.1 15 20± 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 16.8 16.8 16 22± 0.2 0.2 3.7 3.7 16.3 16.3 17 60± 0.2 0.2 3.8 3.8 45.6 45.6 18 134± 0.4 0.4 14.2 4.2 225.1 225.1 TOTAL 4921 I 662.8 886.1 RATIONAL 14ETHOD: DRAIN AREA " n ^i" "Q^ AREA IN C 25 25 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP, EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 77.3 77.3 2 14± 0.5 0.6 5.2 5.5 36.4 77.0 3 18± 0.4 0.7 4.2 5.5 30.2 69.3 4 10± 0.4 0.7 5.0 5.8 20.0 40.6 5 6± 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.2 12.0 26.0 6 10± 0.4 0.6 5.1 5.5 20.4 33.0 7 10± 0.3 0.4 4.7 5.0 14.1 20.0 8 12± 0.3 0.4 4.7 5.0 16.9 24.0 9 16± 0.3 0.5 4.7 5.1 22.6 40.8 10 4± 0.3 0.5 5.1 5.2 6.1 10.4 11 4± 0.3 0.5 5.0 5.1 6.0 10.2 12 12± 0.2 0.5 4.5 5.1 10.8 30.6 13 34± 0.2 0.4 4.2 5:0 28.6 68.0 14 14± 0.3 0.4 4.2 4.7 17.6 23.5 15 20± 0.2 0.2 3.8 3.8 15.2 15.2 16 22± 0.2 0.2 3.3 3.3 14.5 14.5 17 60± 0.2 0.2 3.4 3.4 40.8 40.8 18 134± 0.4 0.4 3.8 3.8 203.7 203.7 TOTAL 492± 579.1 824.9 RATIONAL METHOD: DRAIN AREAnCrr 110 rre10 AREA IN NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP, EXIST. PROP. 1 923 0.2 0.2 3.5 3.5 64.4 64.4 2 14± 0.5 0.6 4.3 4.7 30.1 39.5 3 18± 0.4 0.7 3.5 4.7 25.2 59.2 4 10± 0.4 0.7 4.1 4.8 16.4 33.6 5 6± 0.4 0.7 4.1 5.2 9.8 21.8 6 10± 0.4 0.6 4.2 4.6 16.8 27.6 7 103 0.3 0.4 3.9 4.1 11.7 16.4 8 123 0.3 0.4 3.9 4.1 14.0 19.7 9 163 0.3 0.5 3.9 4.2 18.7 33.6 10 4± 0.3 0.5 4.2 4.3 5.0 8.6 11 43 0.3 0.5 4.1 4.2 4.9 8.4 12 12± 0.2 0.5 3.8 4.2 9.1 25.2 13 34± 0.2 0.4 3.6 4.1 24.5 55.8 14 14± 0.3 0.4 3.5 3.9 14.7 21.8 15 20± 0.2 0.2 3.1 3.1 12.4 12.4 16 22± 0.2 0.2 2.6 2.6 11.4 11.4 17 603 0.2 0.2 2.7 2.7 32.4 32.4 18 1343 0.4 0.4 3.1 3.1 166.2 166.2 492± 487.7 658.0 Refer to Drainage Plan A. Drain Areas No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17 and 18 flow from Highland Avenue through the Golf Course and exits at the existing 4' x 4' box culvert at Boston 6 Maine Railroad tracks. The watershed area consists of approximately 400± acres and slopes from 5% to 20%. B. Drain Areas No. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 (total 54± Acres) flow from approximately 1,000' inside the project area and enters Swampscot Road at various locations to "Thompsons Meadow". C. Drain Areas No. 10, 14 and 15 (total 38± Acres) flow from approximately 1,000' inside the project area and enters directly into "Thompson Meadow". D. Storage area on the Golf Course, along the railroad tracks, consists of approximately 28± Acres to elevation 25.0± which is critical. The railroad tracks will be breached at any- thing above the 25 foot elevation. 1. Storage Capacity equals 7,300,000 Cu. Ft. or Approximately 54,600,000 Gallons. 2. Existing Culvert Allows: 170± C.F.S. 3. x100 (Exist.) equals 594± C.F.S. 4100 (Prop.) equals 763± C.F.S. 4. Storage Time equals 3.4 hours. . 5. Maximum Elevation of flooding for 100 year I storm equals 22.5 feet. 6. Conclusion: The Storage Area with the exist- ing culvert make an excellent storage basin and control structure as they presently exist; also controlling flows to the existing three 36" culverts on Jefferson Avenue. E. Storage Area along the proposed road through the Golf Course at Station 15 + 0 to 23 + 0 collects most of the run-off from Drain Area. No. 1 and is approximately 6± Acres. Our intent is to construct a l± Acre pond for retention and to water the greens on the Golf Course, but not to impede the flow of water or create any additional flooding. Street drainage would also be added to this storage area for maintaining a constant water level. F. Storage Area at No. 13 is the second most critical retention area within the project and enters the proposed Golf Course Road at Station 33 + 0. The outlets for this area should be modified, for a 100 year storm, to retain water levels at Elevation 100.0± and to control its outflow at a constant rate. In doing so, we will be able to divert much of the run-off that presently flows to Swampscot Road, thus reducing the problems with existing culverts and drains, which would presently be inadequate to handle a storm of this size. The storage time that this elevation would be maintained is approximately 2 hours. G. Storage Areas at No. 8 and 12 would be converted into ponds and retention areas which would work in conjunction with diverting run-off from Swampscot Road. The proposed pond at No. 12 would be controlled to a maximum water level of Elevation 113.0±. The proposed pond at No. 8 would be controlled to a maximum water level of Elevation 120.0±. Both proposed ponds would also receive street drainage. FLOW PATTERN - 100 YEAR STORM DRAINAGE PROPOSED AREA EXIISTING FINAL NO. EXISTING PROPOSED 100 2100 1 Basin "B" to "A" Same (96) 96 c.f.s. 2 Basin "C" to "A" Same (48) 58 c.f.s. 3 Basin "C" to "A" Same (38) 100 c.f.s. 4 Basin "C" to "A" Same (24) 49 c.f.s. 5 Swampscott Road Basin "C" to "A" (14) 31 c.f.s. 6 Swampscott Road Basin "C" to "A" (25) 41 c.f.s. 7 Swampscott Road Same (18) 24 c.f.s. 8 Basin "E" to "C" to "A" Same (21) 29 c.f.s. 9 Swampscott Road Thompsons Meadow _ (28) 50 c.f.s. 10 Thompsons Meadow Same ( 8) 13 c.f.s. 11 Swampscott Road Same ( 8) 12 c.f.s. 12 Basin "D" to "C" to "A" Same (14) 37 c.f.s. 13 Basin "C" to "A" Same (37) 82 c.f.s. 14 Thompsons Meadow Same (22) 33 c.f.s. 15 Thompsons Meadow Same (20) 20 c.f.s. 16 Basin "A" Same (19) 19 c.f.s. 17 Basin "A" Same (52) 52 c.f.s.. 18 Basin "A" Same 258 258 c.f.s. EXISTING PROPOSED RWM -OFF AREA 8100 4100 Swampscott Road 93± c.f.s. 36± c.f.s. Thompsons Meadow 50± c.f.s 116± c.f.s. Basin "E" 21± :c.f.s. 29± c.f.s. I Basin "D" 14± c.f.s. 37± c.f.s. Basin "C" 147± c.f.s. 361± c.f.s. (2 hour storage) Basin "B" 96± c.f.s. 96± c.f.s. Basin "A" 329± c.f.s. 329± c.f.s. (3 hour storage) CONCLUSION: (Based on 100 Year Storm) The Preceeding calculations, with the proposed retention areas and control structures, show the following results: 1. The run-off to Swampscot Road would be reduced from + approximately 93_+ c.f.s. to 36_ c.f.s. , by almost 40%, thus substantially eliminating the drainage problems that can be anticipated in the existing drainage system. 2. The Run-off to Thompsons Meadow would be increased from approximately 50 c.f.s. to 116± c.f.s. ; however, due to the size and storage capacity of this area, also the decrease in run-off from Swampscott Road, there would be a minimal impact to Thompsons Meadow and the down- stream properties. 3. Controls of Basin "E" and "D" which flow directly to Basin "C", with a storage time at Basin "C" of approxi- mately 2 hours, would keep outflows at the same or re- duce3rate after construction of the project as now flow without any construction. 4. Control of Basin "B", which flows to Basin "A", would maintain a no increase in run-off. 5. Existing Basin "A" of approximately 28± Acres and its 4' x 4' box culvert, provide more than 3 hours of stor- age time for over 54,000,000 gallons of water. This Basin makes an excellent natural storage area as it presently exists, also controlling flows to the existing triple 36" culverts on Jefferson Avenue. 6. The overall drainage pattern is greatly improved with the proposed storage areas and their control structures, also by diverting flows from overloaded drainage areas to less critical areas, the downstream properties will have a much reduced flooding crest after completion of the project. These conclusions are derived from the cal- culations based on a 100 Year Storm and it should be noted that the impacts based on a 50 Year, 25 Year and 10 Year Storm show even greater control and less impact after con- struction than before construction. - o-. Z4 %-lAe 3 C 4).a�R.. '� µ� C.41 LP.►.a C •Q-.C--A.L�+•j Z'RuST ��SH OF,y4s� pETtTto\�FOG 'FAFAR_O COKPA� t �S ?� '� p ROBERT 4� A I N \ 6.tzL.' Q_ L.S. �og�¢� E . -(ASCk4� O. G/STEP a4k' gSSJONALEp6� 3 . 0 �.ae.HEs ��s oti+6 laeue L Sa Z. LZS = Z.3 .. -------- g-Tc6, - --A Stu s s��. Q Trp►cx o� - o.a _._ Etc�stl fa y _ .�¢ea�.� V_�P6 _ _ -Cut_u E2Z-g . �►4 E — �-t.�. ---FSG.-- -- _.A a-am. ------ G� ._---------------- .------ _ Z Cu. T.T. PET- SEC• 11J toe Q100 moo. A CPfis Fx\ST. Ytt OP. Ex�ST. -air. C-Ats r. 'pR.oP. i 92 0.2 0.7- S.Z 5.7- 4r,, 9co. Z 14t cp q$ 3 loot 0.4 0:1 53 6.9 38 loo 4 lot 6. 4- 01 G.o 1.0 24 49 s `t o•4 o-i 6 \ot 0.4- 04 6.7. o zs 41 _ 'z4 8 1Zt 0.3 0.4 - s a 6.0 _ 7-1 z9 151 50 4t 0.5 - - - - - - - --- -O.2 o'S -- � __. - 143. n.3 __- -_0.4 - - S.Z _5•a---' --'LZ ---- ----33 — 4'S _ So Zo *•Z..� s A.c:.4SPik, -F24bt-� }4t`t�c�..�uiE . �'ttev TKE �t-F COc�R.SE � C1C\STS A.T . ?iiE. EX15T: Step �.Q-ems. �°o v s t sTs �e0o '- •�aeP_E S e) Se..o PFS �t�O K S�Io ----- TC e `$ • `�YP�tu �A¢.rcA �o . r5 , -.Co _-.. --- _._ __ cuS _�FQoK -. _ .�P►QQ.1G.o1c,. 1000__-- �uSt4-E ___.__ _ ___C_�GA"�p-lJS -_. �b _._- --.1-11iOblY30L1S ---r�•Q04�.--- _�_--- - � '�.�•�•� _ A.ci� � , 1094. Vit_ IS — -- C`o'os• 4_ 3$*�� ---- 0.00'_------___t�sto_�__`—__. �►s As.C—r -_ ' . �. �4Peox . Z$ '� pcQ.� � 6u�v. Z5•o'z wN\cv� \s CQ1TtCAC_ . Twe, 'R.'Q. TRActs Cruets �$E. �t2�1=�44� PrT A��tT� lw� A c 'i�+rc Z 5 ter. E tJE u arto.J . 5_7bQ"b �a 'C-49ACaTcj 'c 1e3co,000 Oit. APP¢ok. S4 ,t000 ,.Ooo Geo.-C.s . -J <srt \ C.ut�e:1LT At_c.cC�g : Vie C•�•5. 4> 63TOQv.4E "TIKE 3. 4 --- - -- - —r° ------------------------------- -,A+�-mac -- C.oYaTczo c„�.._\ e.�c.-----Tri-o w_S_—fid ----- ------------'C1kae.� ----"-'KF. . - u----- ----- _--- -----_____UNC- ___TNT.Q►+sT_._-._.tS_.�.-.�=Cp._�LO�Y�ftuGT---�....__�� -_._�.:__ ... -. ..._. � . __ \ .w __A - -- ------ oR. CCL.6�a,r� A�� 1�OOtTloas.�. �ts�oOlNt1 . S�'R.cv� "Dtz�.�.a r►a�E wou Lo +iso SE. Aop�o To Z'tkls STa2P,tg Amp, 'Fo� MI+.c�.,To,n.��►.�c.� A C9aei►sTA�tiT WisZ� ��, , '�caa.a� �2Ep. a� � l3 is TttE Z•"� KnST C¢.tT\co.�,,, j 'Q.rTts�noa P.QEA wtTW � U Cxo�.F CoutZSC 'Rv, @ 5TH►, . 33� � . -Ck� ou-rums Foy 'Tlkls . A2.� sw,��o Koos Ft , Tro¢. I. too S�aav\ t To "'Z W4+T"WC C. OUVW-"s A.T 6t.lV. loO.O 3 Ta 'Cb C-0'a.►'C ROLA l"Cs oVT vt c A.T -1►+ T) TL*kv z c� X30 w 6 WIG.< 8t A�C.E Td lotuL=+2T KuC�I of T� 'eco w� oF`� 'Ttt PST �Rt�+a•Tt.tt . �c.owS T8 Sw �riP SocsYC 'V,'aw0 l ' T%*QS "[mss 'Flzo�c-�+1s w lZ �l Ex�sZ t�q CuwctZS �2A1 �S � 4.atrtlGN t�aovL�p . �12.t9'Stz.UTt.s� _BE __.. ..- -"CC�Is - S�'��. . Tkk6 _ .SC'oB,Ac.E.-- Z'lk� .._ _3►�t-oaT_ _ - - - - -- PR�ro.3 t�aH.lc4l .Wou�A _Ca��oCi.IG___.-lel ---�°A'nJ-------..------ ---. ULTtoUJ W lTM .- .flut5�2.T.tNe - AZAiNor-IF 1 _-__---- _ - _ _ Sup m�snQs�o �o�, __Zits ._'StcaP. _Po►.�o- -�--_�_lZ _____-------_. wt�,-tom_-_.----._------- ---------- -- -- ---_A___-�=1AX.------ -- rY Q®►t to A.&4m -- ' A HANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. h 85 MAPLE STREET . DANVERS. MASSACHUSETTS 01923 . (817-777.3050) 6 February 84 Mr. Gerard F. McNeil The Fafard Companies 290 Eliot Street Ashland, MA 01721 Re: Subdivision called Highland Acres, Response to Conservation Commission comments by letter of 30 Jan 84. Dear Gerry: As per your request, we herein address the subject comments as they relate to stormwater drainage. 1. Methodology used in our drainage analysis is identical to that used by HMM Associates, i.e. , "The Rational Method". A drainage computation comparison is attached. Actual design peak flows are higher than those previously proposed. 2. Due to the hilly terrain, flow velocities are rather high as water exits the drainage system. Energy will be dissipated through contruction of a stormwater energy diffuser, a detail of which is attached. 3. It is our opinion that the existing control structure just upstream of the railroad at the south end of the site is more than adequate to handle runoff from Traders Way after develop- ment of the site north of First Street. Only after development begins south of First Street should consideration be given to additional control between First Street and the railroad. See "Current Applicability - Detention Area C" attached. If you have any questions or need further information, please call. Respectfully submitted, HANCOCK SURVEY ASSOC. , INC. konrA Gus S arry, , E. AFS dlh Encl.'_.4 AANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES INC. Joe 85 Maple Street SHEET HD. OF DANVERS. MASSACHUSETTS 01923-2877 (617)777-3050 (617)662-9659 CALCULATED SY kE2 DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE �A 4- PA4X.- 7- 7 L 14 T QA rr -A TABLE 6.5-1 DRAINAGE IMPACTS OF 10 YEAR STORM DRAIN AREA ^itt .O AREA IN �C� 10 Q10 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 3.5 3.5 64.4 64.4 2 14± 0.5 0.6 4.3 4.7 30.1 39.5 e43 181 0.4 0.7 3.5 4.7 25.2 59.2 C 10± 0.4 0.7 4.1 4.8 16.4 33.6 G 5 6± 0.4 0.7 4.1 5.2 9.8 21.8 L12U 6 10± 0.4 0.6 4.2 4.6 16.8 27.6 7 10± 0.3 0.4 3.9 4.1 11.7 16.4 8 122 0.3 0.4 3.9 4.1 14.0 19.7 9 16± 0.3 0.5 3.9 4.2 18.7 33.6 10 4± 0.3 0.5 4.2 4.3 5.0 8.6 11 4± 0.3 0.5 4.1 4.2 4.9 8.4 12 12± 0.2 0.5 3.8 4.2 9.1 25.2 13 34± 0.2 0.4 3.6 4.1 24.5 55.8 14 14± 0.3 0.4 3.5 3.9 14.7 21.8 15 202 0.2 0.2 3.1 3.1 12.4 12.4 16 22± 0.2 0.2 2.6 2.6 11.4 11.4 17 60± 0.2 0.2 2.7 2.7 32.4 ' 32.4 18 134± 0.4 0.4 :3.1 3.1 166.2 166.2 4921 487.7 658.0 Rational Method : Q Aci = Cu. ft. per sec. 6- 58 • JOP7 I��j I TABLE 6.5-3 DRAINAGE IMPACTS OF 50 YEAR STORM DRAIN AREA "1" •• •• AREA IN ••C • 50 Q50 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 4.8 4.8 88.3 88.3 2 14± 0.5 0.6 5.8 6.2 40.6 52.1 3 18± 0.4 0.7 4.8 6.2 34.6 78.1 4 10± 0.4 0.7 5.5 6.3 22.0 44.1 5 6± 0.4 0.7 5.5 6.8 13.2 28.5 I22Ci'h 6 10± 0.4 0.6 5.7 6.0 22.8 36.0 7 10± 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.5 15.6 22.0 8 12± 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.5 18.7 26.4 9 16± 0.3 0.5 5.2 5.7 25.0 45.6 10 4± 0.3 0.5 5.7 5.8 6.8 11.6 11 4± 0.3 0.5 5.5 5.7 6.6 11.4 12 12i 0.2 0.5 5.0 5.7 12.0 34.2 13 34± 0.2 0.4 4.8 5.5 32.6 74.8 14 14± 0.3 0.4 4.8 5.2 20.2 29.1 15 20± 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 16.8 16.8 16 22± 0.2 0.2 3.7 3.7 16.3 16.3 17 602 0.2 0.2 3.8 3.8 45.6 45.6 18 1342 0.4 . 0.4 4.2 4.2 225.1 225.1 TOTAL 4921 662.8 886.1 1 6-60 _IO►� t`lC91 TABLE 6.5-4 DRAINAGE IMPACTS OF 100 YEAR STORM DRAIN AREA » » »i» » » AREA IN ! 100 Q100 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92! 0.2 0.2 5.2 5.2 96 96 2 141 0.5 0.6 6.5 6.9 48 58 3 18± 0.4 0.7 5.3 6.9 38C49 4 10± 0.4 0.7 6.0 7.0 24 5 6! 0.4 0.7 6.0 7.3 14 31 6 10_ 0.4 0.6 6.2 6.8 25 41 7 10± 0.3 0.4 5.8 6.0 18 24 8 121 0.3 0.4 5.8 6.0 21 29 9 16a 0.3 0.5 5.8 6.2 28 50 10 4' 0.3 0.5 6.2 6.5 8 13 11 42 0.3 0.5 6.0 6.2 8 12 12 122 0.2 0.5 5.7 6.2 14 37 13 34i 0.2 0.4 5.4 6.0 37 82 14 141 0.3 0.4 5.2 5.8 22 33 15 202 0.2 0.2 4.8 4.8 20 20 16 221 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 19 19 J 17 601 0.2 0.2 4.3 4.3 52 52 I IS 1342 0.4 0.4 4.8 4.8 258 258 TOTAL 4921 7501 10041 6-61 �.0Hpt.�TlCT 10 �--o 2 w4y b�Vt.k�IZ tCalll .�t-D1'� 9Z4LTj TR.L*T �r�ru.o�2 r � �a�b�.n G�HP�,-�-►t�� 3� : l�-1u-bGQGI� Gil.bt2�lL�/ dyi�DG, 6 l,�G , III 3 n bfi 2 n 9>--;) To t�cGoatnb►-lY � %rl4�irn�Gt�bo� PL1►�.-4 �p2 85 Maple Street — SHEET NO. I OF DANVERS. MASSACHUSETTS 01923-2877 (617) 777-3050 (617) 662-9659 CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE eaA �. c CLt LGt✓ jr 0, G ovt i rv' VIS. U✓► i J- e C - TG �y r HANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES INC. JOe //__ ► v� 1 85 Maple Street SHEET NO. Or DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS 01923-2877 CALCULATED BY- DATE (617) 7773050 (617) 662-9659 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE hTTlhricarL <oo Vtll;lly[�E 12 Ac u.-lktov u e4j�y TtA n ul tog4. or) 1 w�I�uhl•�y � �j 2 ! • DPS I 2r ! , a(o . r2 2 ,20 ► 00 2. ¢ 00 � t 2 to 25 5yaA' To>z►-i 2 u1 _ 7 D . nt,�rt-.&--('I.o —IV-5 potZ. IZD.TIo►y� t1S'(�r� ► t�Ut2bT1o►.1 = 'itiHE or Go►--��►-l-fRb'S'�O►-.l HANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES INC. -- --- -- ---- 85 Maple Street SHEET NO. OF DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS 01923-2877 2 8 3 CALCULATED (617) 777-3050 (617) 662.9659 BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE �i10m .l °hod 12,2_ '. G.�✓LLG� .__�InGI�7L26t�Vvt,:_ ��P:� •: .. ftm 01 CIA-AA vt a t Vit . 100. 0 4e;76 � • �Ur,� � CV � , ' TABLE 6. 5-2 h►d Q O�C/ DRAINAGE IMPACTS OF 25 YEAR STORM DRAIN AREA AREA IN 25 425 NO. ACRES EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. EXIST. PROP. 1 92± 0.2 0.2 4.2 4.2 77.3 77.3 2 14± 0.5 0.6 5.2 5.5 36.4 77.0 3 18± 0.4 0.7 4.2 5.5 30.2 69.3 4 10± 0.4 0.7 5.0 5.8 20.0 40.6 5 6± 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.2 12.0 26.0 6 10± 0.4 0.6 5.1 5.5 20.4 33.0 lio 7 101 0.3 0.4 4.7 5.0 14.1 20.0 5 8 12± 0.3 0.4 4.7 5.0 16.9 24.0 9 16± 0.3 0.5 4.7 5.1 22.6 40.8 10 4± 0.3 0.5 5.1 5.2 6.1 10.4 11 4± 0.3 0.5 5.0 5.1 6.0 10.2 12 122: 0.2 0.5 4.5 5.1 10.8 30.6 13 34± 0.2 0.4 4.2 5.0 28.6 68.0 14 14± 0.3 0.4 4.2 4.7 17.6 23.5 15 20± 0.2 0.2 3.8 3.8 15.2 15.2 16 22± 0.2 0.2 3.3 3.3 14.5 14.5 17 60± 0.2 0.2 3.4 3.4 40.8 40.8 18 1342 0.4 0.4 3.8 3.8 203.7 203.7 TOTAL 4922 579.1 824.9 l J 6-59 HANGWK sUKVLV AJAU%AtilcD IIVA+. 85 Maple Street SHEET NO. OF (V DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS 01923-2877 CALCULATE DATE (617) 777.3050 (617) 662.9659 CHECKED BY .DATE SCALE till •... O ate- n Q r- fl o p t-_ ►�- Q o ca, a O O 0 _... 'A tr .V Ilk y, `O L9 /c sao .h IJL ...r r 4"odee Ac a i. o.Iee tR QO 3e GI n • i es f.0 L•It , u SO Le S' so S/ s _ e..et n � Df 9c 3�qD _ .IvL ,30 Loe/ /e 3e 0 ]` d Z e.eeel G— b 1/ qip I.eso. e.eea 2 r ° G.O 3 Lem/ e./seed � � 6 I 7.o I,eIIeL � e.ecmi Q ed S 9•o e.slmD IJ °.S L°eoe/ o,/ d e.eoeeed /5.0 e.000"e V O.e..aeE Y, M.o .n� i MANN/NCS .? FO,QM!/LQ �.FA.oN/C SOGUT/ON HANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES INC. 85 Maple Street UEET NO. DAWERS, MASSACHUSETTS 01923-2877 CCULAMM.- DAU (617)777-3050 (617)662-9659 CHUM my-- 8CAU A;-Of 41. 0-1721 u►-i P20LAL -AT _411 7 i0o *ALI t -7-7- 47- 114,'i E u j o m \ _ U N 0 01 3 Y L A U � O N t E w L u N w v 0 c o •,� o u ri o. n m •p -.+ N N d vt H F o C > •M+ uOI N cl C7 E • 3 E E u C •.0 0i T 11 O O 3a S U N N• , O L ttl Y •N Y "7 V N u T Y O ca n c u �� . m i•••1 L m u �o . I ; cp m b' a) C O N O O 1 p + u�F� N 'EO _ • U 'd d ro T•o •01 F 6 s+ .. .� r+ v •.. o U. �1 m .� H u 'Y •.V C i 00(n O. 7 N '•.� u O ^= F+ O W a C N u U N V u E OF y-, aLi co w C U V i F>i l Y •.+ .7 O N .`t 01 F w 3 �., N N •.a N N F w 7 O C Y N Ol N U H r T •.+ i Uro > 1-i N 3. Y .-� .+ •.-1 L W UI '+ O L F H.a C S O N 3 a~i C N CO X d xE O v w w -.F+ 0, Y G) E R7 U 00'O F \ON Ci.� N Y N 4 •d L 'O N W U) H F N N N v •0 U - O O d Y � N ° O. r to YNR 4 SNtX3 Sr\. )5 • rMANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES INC. %Do 85 Maple Street SHEFTNO. OF, DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS 01923-2877 (627)777-3050 (617)662-9659 CALCULATED MY CHECKED BY DATE $CALE L T IV lz_ V ...................... too Ice 0 e) Vo .......... . .. ....... i A ma L ja4 ......... .. ..... vle YP 6-H AA A'A 1A1 A I A IA AAX A 10 /111 A 1A 1 i Forms — f- - `� DEOEFileNo. 64-92 • s (To be D,ov,oed by DEOEI I �3 f'T CityRown SALE? Commonwealth '' 1 of Massachusetts ( I FAFARD COMPANIES( _ t .�/ ADDlicant Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L. c. 131 , §40 From Department of Environmental Quality Engineering To iTr . Grego warren The Fafard Comnanies - - (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) 290 Eliot St. 290 Eliot St. Ashland , MA 01721 Address Ashland, MA 01721 Address This Order is issued and delivered as follows: CZ ',by hand delivery to applicant or representative on n � ,ta 19RA (date) (date) by certified mail, return receipt requested on This project is located z Highland Avenue, Salem, MA The property is recorded at the Registry of Essex Book 5292 6172 Page '7'34 . 73 Certificate (if registered) The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on Harch 25 , 1983 (date) The public hearing was closed on January 12 , 1984 (date) Findings D2partment of Environmental The Quality Engineering has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of Intent and plans and has held a public hee ng on the project. Based on the information available to the DEOE at this time, the DEOE has determined :hat the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Si-,Iiticance set lorth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protecticn Under the Act (check as appropriate): 99 Public water supply Q Storm damage prevention ❑ Private water supply 12 Prevention of pollution ® Ground water supply ❑ Land containing shellfish ® Flood control ❑ Fisheries 5.1 . .I ,y4 �.11,11:.6 1 C:I V•••,y'•yL \.1.., \•.l:VJ vGl kw; 1\:,y U.1�11 V11..1, lV �'V•=V1 IVJc' 11,1'1 1,esls checked above. The DFOF orders that ell ,vork sha!I be performed / in accordance with said condi;ions and with the Novice of Intent re!erenced above.To the extent that the fol yy `n ?c!C-a:fonc er eth;r prepost ; s ,mit;ad :i;h the ^:c: ce lowing conditions mo•.. or dii Er from the G s, -p j of Intent, the condi:ions shill cor.',rct. crs sS. r te.=1.t = cc:.dif. •"'-='F?re!r:, •' with e:!rein?d sin;C?es zr,d c::.r ra!r- i r, 1 . Fa:wre to c_ = .� ures, sh_.' e ceeme caur- rl to revoke or odify i btris Crd r. 2. This Order does not grant any proG2ry richis or any exclusive Grivi!agss; It Cees not 2uthcrze any injury to private Crope'y or in-,;cn of pr;.-at- "I ri,tts. e or any other Gerson of the necessity of como!yirm with 211 3. This Order does not relic:e the perm applicable ederal, slat? or Kcal statutes, ordinances. by-!a.+s or ra,U!2ii n5. other app r `'�' ` '�` ' 4. The work au;he^zed h2reur, Car shalt be completed within thrEa years from the date of this Order unless either of the follo%ving apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or yaa (b) the time fcr COmp!et!on has been extended to a s_?C_iea date more thzrrV.- b!1'-55 than C_. five years, from :he 'C2ta cf issue^ce and toih that date and the special c:rcumstznces: g -_ the extendedr-'eriod are set icrth in ti's G.Cer.e__. v .. ch ' e;::end?d t` the IC�I,I,1. ^y £:u;:'.Cniy fci Cite Cr m'vi B Gc.^.O('. Ct CI^. l0 :!�(='2%c.''.rg 5. This Orcer rzy be / e ; upon app!ica tior, to the !°suing aC;hCn '2i!22st Cu La;%5 JCr !O t,ia e:p ra.,Cn 6. Any fill usedn connection with this prc;2c: srla!t'ee clean fill, cc.^.;ainir,g no trash, refuse, rubbish or de• r but not limited to lumber, biic:<s, plaster,v:ir2. I s;h, paper, ca=card, G:Pe, ties, ashas, ris including y I .r,2 tcregoir . g refrigerators, motor vehicles or Gzls of any o 7y 7, No work shatl bC undertaken until all admin7st'£;ive appeal p?rICdS`.fO . tells Order ha`e e!a7C?d or, !f such an appeal has been filed, until all proCeedlcgs teicr2 the Department ave been CClilriE;ad. 8. No:vcrk shat! t2 und?r;aken ur.t;l lF.e Fina! Order has teen recorded in ,he Registry of Deeds or the Land • In :he :•�; -o f titre of the aifec:_d property. I =-+ „_ chain o ,and istoc�t__, w.l.,a! Court for the distrct in wF.ich the o - case of recorded land, file F!nal Order s.`si: also ba nc;aC in the Registry's Grantor Index under 1h_ name r of the lard upon wr ich thLand Court proposad wcr%is to be done. In tte case o! reg!s:ered land, the of the ownet also to noted on the It rmation shall be submitted to the t Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon%,,Kch Final Order r of the proposed work is to to done.The recording infoon the form at the end of :h:E Ceder prier to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be disp'a;ped at the s!te cat less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing :he v+erds, ";.:zssacrl ?Cs cc,zrtr'nenl of Environmental Quality Engl.neering, File Nur,.t?r 64-92 de'-r^'nation a-d c _ori qu=_-ted ;oma'<e z ._ ,. 10. 'Nhere t�a Deo .r,r._,.. c, c"+:r_nr.ertai Cuz . _r _ ng is re ., . . ^ c`•`il tc a pert y ,o c!l aCBGC' "cce__1. g. - - ^•..- ce Ccr:<- ^ Ccrr.mis;ion ,. . - _ , . - l0 Sod? 0 �a.'Sc=.r'y �..'__ _. • •• •• C2d a:.-,, e - ,: she!) fCl�r•:+ith request in :vnting tha! a 1 i . U;Cn Ccr' 2:.C� C! rC dcSCi: ° :h a,.r::Ca.^. _ Ce"i;::cc:e C: CCT�Gr=_.Joe be issued sta!:nc, that the wort,has been satiszc:orily ccmG'.Etau. 12.The work shalt conform to the following plans and special conditions: 5.2 . Plans: Detail=Sca e 1 =40 a` d Signed and Stamped by: On File with: "( Tie 4/31/66 as prepared for Highland Realty _an of Land in Salam, revised Trust by Essex Survey DEQE. - Show=iD4—Bores' no 7/30/84 s�-zvjce and revised 2getated Wetlands by by Farfard Companies IM ASSOCS. 5/30/84 7/30/84 Supplemental DEQE Drainage Study 7/17/34 HPIM Associates Highlan Acres pre- pared for Farfard Compa Special Conditions(use additional paper it necessary) 1. All wetlands to be filled as a result of this project shall be compensated for on a one for one, square foot for square foot . basis . These replacement areas shall have surface and ground- water elevations approximately equal to the wetland areas to be filled. Their overall location and horizontal configuration, with respect to the banks of the watercourses they border, shall be similar to that of the filled wetlands , and they shall have an unrestricted hydraulic connection to the same water body as the wetland system adjacent to which they are being con- structed. A sten-by-step plan for the wetland replacement shall be prepared by the Applicant. 2 . All replacement areas to be constructed shall be lined on their surface with topsoil excavated from the wetlands to be filled as a result of the project. Arrangements shall be made for storage and protection of the topsoil after removal and before replacement. 3 . A report shall be presented to the DEQE and the Salem Conservation Commission at the end of two growing seasons subsequent to the implementation of this project indicating the amount of wetlands that has actually been replicated/created by the construction of the replacement areas and any associated construction or plantings. Any proposed compensatory wetland area which does not revegetate with characteristic bordering vegetated wet- land species over 75% of its surface area within two growing seasons shall be planted with characteristic species . A plant- ing plan for such purposes shall be presented to and approved by the DEQE prior to its implementation. (continued) .................................................................................................................................................................................... (Leave Space Blank) 53B Ss'pecial Conditions (continued) ALEM (Fafard Companies) Wetlands File $64-92 I ! ( 4 . At least 75% of the surface of the replacement areas shall be reestablished with indigenous wetlands plant species within two growing seasons , and prior to said vegetative reestablish- ment, any exposed soil in the replacement area shall be temporarily stabilized to prevent erosion. 5. The large pit near the intersection of First Street and Swampscott Road with a storage volume of 86 , 000 cubic feet, as referred to on pages 12, 13 and 16 of the referenced "Supplemental Drainage Study" , shall be increased in size to accommodate theinflowfrom "Catchment S-1" associated with the one hundred vear design storm. 6 . So that thep proposed construction will not exacerbate existing local flooding problems, the "discharge at the low point of Catchment S-4" , as described in the referenced drainage study and shown on the plan titled: "Highland Acres , Prelimi- nary Plan of Land in Salem, MA" and dated February 4 , 1982 and revised May 5 , 1983 by Robert E. Maschi , P .E . and R.L. S . , shall not be increased beyond its present level , 110 cubic feet per second. 7 . Prior to any construction within one hundred feet of the wet- lands as shown on the above referenced plan, an erosion control barrier shall be installed between the construction site and any downgradient wetlands . 8 . The Fafard Companies, Inc . shall be responsible for ensuring that maintenance of all drainage inlets and outlets become a condition of all leasing or ovmership of those properties for sale or lease within Highland Acres which will have drainage easements on them and will forward copies of all such mainten- ance agreements to the Salem Conservation Commission and the DEQE. 9 . The City of Salem and the Fafard Companies , Inc . shall enter, into an agreement which guarantees maintenance of the proposed control structure, and forward such agreement to the Salem Conservation Commission and the DEQE. 10 . Construction and locus plans for anv proposed above-ground or underground storage facilities for chemicals and/or fuel , to- gether with engineering construction plans , shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission and the DEQE prior to their construction. 11 . Any other changes proposed for the project as shown on the plans referenced above shall be submitted to DEQE and the Conservation Commission prior to implementation. At that time a determination will be made on whether said changes will re- quire additional conditions or the filing of a new Notice of Intent. "Issued by the Department of Environment ality Engineering. Signature �F On this 4 h day of OCtOb r 19 R4 before me personally appeared mhn —c F MrT nngh 1 in Acting Comm to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. rT- N a y Public My commission expires The applicant,the owner,any person aggrieved by this Superseding Order,any owner of land abutting the land upon which the pro- posed work is to be dome or any len persons pursuant to G.L.c.30A, §1 OA,are hereby notified of their right to request an adjudicatory hearing pursuant to G.L.30A, §10.providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department within len days from the dale of issuance of the Superseding Order,and is addressed to: Docket Clerk.Office of General Counsel,Department of Environmental Ouality Engineering,One Winter Street.Boston,MA 02108.A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the conservation commission,the applicant,and any other party. A Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing shall comply with the Department's Rules for Adjudicatory Proceedings,310 CMR 1.01(6),and shall contain the following information: (a) the DEOE Wetlands File Number,name of the applicant Eid address of the project; (b) the complete name,address and telephone number of ihra party filing the request,and,if represented by counsel,the name and address of the attorney; - (c) the names and addresses of all other parties,it known; - (d) a clear and concise statement of(1)the facts which are grounds for the proceeding,(2)the objections to this Superseding Order, including specifically the manner in which it is ai eged to be inconsistent with the Department's Wetlands Regulations(310 CMR 10.00)and does not contribute to the proleclic ,of the interests identified In the Act,and(3)the relief sought through Na adju- - dlcatory hearing,including specifically the char, es desired in the Superseding Order; (e) a statement that a copy of the request has been. ant to the applicant,the conservation commission and each other party or rep- resentative of such parry.it known. Failure to submit all necessary information may result ir.a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing. Detach on dotted Tina and submit to the prior to commencement of work. _..........................................._._..................................................................................................................._................................... Issuing Authority To Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and hzs Deen noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition B on • 19 11 records land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction i5 11 registered land, the document number which identities this transaction is Applicant SignatureSignature 5-4B l C + ' 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: Forms Form 1. MASSACHUSETTS G. L. C. 131 a. 40 NOTICE OF INTENT ALL PARTS OF THIS FORM SHALL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTY OF PERAMY INCLUDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FORM ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF OR THE FILING MAY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE DATE 1. Notice is hereby given in accordance with the provisions of G. L. c. 131, s. 40, that the proposed activity as submitted herein falls within the jurisdiction of said statute, and is located in the G t ,M �\6i![�a0 p►\1Q . a�\tbowlST City/4+ws � kuaiACk. Sa.sauw0�►c�1 1&.0. Mair Street. Recorded at the Registry of SfoJE. ACpW%WPU K , Book lk Page Certificate (if registered) 2. The name(.), address and telephone number of owner(s) of the subject land are: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. \rant paOO titZQ• V6,MQaa_ST• .�6lbl 144.0'L\L lb a �- eW.�t►si � gbas. 3. I have filed identical Notices and plans by Certified Mail with the following: Conservation Commission (original) Date -LIS MAS $3 Maas. Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston (3 copies) Date LS F•IAW a$ A. Rave all permits, variances and approvals as required by C. 131, s. 40 been obtained? W (yes or no). Attach copies to or�ig$inal Notice of Intent. lt9mvrt -FtV40- aF Fq.E.4ta• �'QoekrYa. 5. Enclosed is Statutory Filing Fee of $25.00, payable to City or Town. 6. The came, address and telephone number of the owner's representatives (if any) are as follows: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. Attorney 'Tr�pe¢A` Sr. .Ssi.eaA `IA•Ar• Engineer -tosoccr E. "NbCKI �ZA& ExuOTTSL,4M&Ja64O %6% V060 Agent Q0%ff= E v4Euss%% rZ4o ek"T[_ Web 7. The_purpose of the project is: (Use additional sheets if necessary)) _� *i S0+B1. 7611L%4 — M•�••4�• S. Owner's (or agent's signature) go 14, —y p� OF MqS�� ROBERT Oy�� ly E. MASCHI H q, NO..23M 421ST6Q� 4 ._.. 6/30/80 `d96NALf6. .; 1. .12 - 222.9 , ._ 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: Form 1: continued ' WETLAND PROTECTION ACT ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FORK 1. All parts of this fore are to be filled out by the applicant or his agent under the provisions of 0. L. c. 131, s. 40. 2. Where a section is not relevant to the application in question, the words "Not Applicable" should be entered on the appropriate list. NAME OF APPLICANT µ1G\kLA.�aO �`'tsl .� �r AFw¢ coo t cs ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Zato Stuot-r ST. NMCIPALITIES WHERE ACTIVITY I8 PROPOSED AND NOTICE IS FILED C.ym o32 Saar \ M� DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN APPLICATION (including the dimensions of any existing building, decks, marinas, existing ce spoo1 ) 5 ta.cc.na.losa�utt�s� '4a aa.y___4„ E 1� F DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED ON THE SITE, including grading, dredging, removal of vegetation, ete. Swat A ccs tip x14.4 I Qr.- A. cA. SOILS 1. United States Department of �.ovgb\►aa.�oa� 06 l.�ao4E' Agriculture Soil Types (show on map) 'Qecx,.,-&\.a.c.1a..t_ 71% f.ltna Wl\tt ns Cwa t3d.ae�Ga../�t.. 2. Permeability of sell OR site. (Dates of testing) Kean -%$4 lee, t.c..t 'Vff.RA4F—+.B.LrT+iy.� tL'a'� 3. Rate of percolation of water through the soil. (Dates of testing) CSo'r NVVLAC&'6LAS C C.1•14e SWAAMPO Ss s� S. SMACK WATERS 1. Distance of site from nearest surface water (Date of measurement) wlltys,\a,a 4.rtti.t�e' t,.ta.t\T�\ #T 'ptL.a3�GiLa'T. 2. Sources of runoff water LONM02_4wwo <D►t1. mNk mG 3. Rate of runoff from the site '�waasn eu loo �_SteQ.b�. s Q n 'l�0'3 C•{.8. ♦. Destination of runoff war "C1pea�Q�vaas Kgae.s�n�.a" .Qoat �AlifnQ \%&ASK M►kmwtt. s. CAa1eS1 *"hive* to ff enter on the' Site !� Vol. 12 • 222.10 i _ 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: Toms continued Fors 1: continued C. GROUIM COVER I. Extent of existing impervious ground cover on the site l...n4K m�DP a^t! ry�l.iiCGeeL ' a0°fy 2. Extent of proposed impervious ground cover on the site Lnia.14 nbpgfL SUSLS kt I 3. Extent of existing vegetative cover on the site 4. Extent of proposed vegetative cover on the site 4¢s.S& *Ptusery, D. TOPOGRAPHY 1. Maximum existing elevation on site 2. Minimus existing elevation on site CLW. � x`3.03 3. Maxim proposed elevation of site G�.6J. = 1'boko f 4. Minimum proposed elevation of site S. Description of propoud change in topography ,*ofAte�aa�wa�t ►ar� 'p_sa Z Ey F E. GROUND WATER 1. Minimum depth to water table so site (at time of filing) � % C Z 2. Maximus depth to water table on site (at time of filing) - Gt�s,i. � 1l5•ot 3. Seasonal maximum ground water elevation Y. WATER SUPPLY 1. The source of the water to be provided to the site CrTMt nr TU6t1r- 43nar Stfcrane 2. The expected water requirements (g.p.d.) for the site ti+4eoe 3 �SL pacn bs1 3. The uses to which water will be put _ tos.zMsma,.L rLTe MaaLmALL&-i-- Val. 12 - 222.11 f 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: Forms continued Fors 1: continued 0. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 1. /Sewage disposal system (description and location on the site, of system) r-.Of.1�1i�T Tn E,LtStt>_1 ' N-4%u alt CtPASTT`� t_ St( m 2. Expected content of the sewage effluents (human waste, pesticides, detergents, oils, heavy metals, other chemicals) �s.tsa� fi9A4'S@. � �CeeTlQ_GtGwaTS 3. Expected daily volume of sevage —LeboLOOO* G1&4—. SLM2 VN-4 E. SOLID WASTE 1. Estimated quantity of solid waste to be developed on the site Vbcm h4?9%.l C_A ILL G 2. Method for disposal of solid waste L'>ese- APyueaittra, 3. Plans for recycling of solid waste IaoT �+4Yuca.e�.E I. BOAT YARDS, DOCKS, MARINAS 1. Capacity of marina (number of boats, running feet) IadT A�pPLAC-P,tSLrn 2. Description of docks and floats (site, dimensions) �JaT AOot�eaa 3. Description of sevage pumpout facilities (type of waste disposal) 00or ;hTV'Vucp.et— ♦. Description of fueling facilities and fuel storage tanks L'kYt- -pvQD -t A.6t,.E, S. Description of fuel spill prevention measures and equipment 1.'>Dr k?Vb 0,IL4_6 J. MACT OF PROPOSED ACTION APPLIED FOR 1. Effects as plant species (upland and marine) %-:)Ogre 2. Effects on marine species (shellfish, finfish) VQM-r A.PPLAC-1 W-AS 3. Effects on drainage and runoff A. Etfects on siltation of surface voters Kt �3hM Te 6/30/80 Vol. 12 - 222.12 310 Ch1R: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.": Torr continued Ton 1: continued S. Effects as Erouedwater quality �VE 6. Effects on surface water quality 1.9o�E. K. ALTERNATIVES TO PAOpom ACTION 1. Describe alternatives to the requested action t. Describe the benefits of the requested action over the alternatives �+®0..�t0�.. �outx-0PK�.tT lastt'kk ►.tt�stt.tn.{,. 'Dt•Tutt�rnscs o� c5xtsrw�Q TePo4w.pNtv►�. �'rw�v0,.ss . J 6�sTca�C "�u�e„ Ctet,ha coo�ti'e: . C� Co�yro.e�.. ��aasa—e,F.p �R.o1�l �esc4 iltsouee 'Tke Toast%tLiTV op 'Fwootac, Yaesodo�-.{ vow w��R-�yl►{ 3��►1 OFMAss4 OF Mks =oma' ROEERT °tiN �� ROBERT SrCyo MASCHI E NO,236,% MASCHI y g 9 p 24395 '6 fir+/STEP P 6� �ssYORALEEa hn Suave°� Lit J 6/30/80 Vol. 12 - t.ld ADDENDUM: QUESTION 1 BOOK PAGE DESCRIPTION ACRES 5292 734 Lot 6 14.89 5292 734 Lot 2 6.44 5292 734 unnumbered lot 5.29 6172 734 3.13 5292 734 lot 3 4.46 5292 734 lot 4 7.22 60117 793 lot A 8.2 43944 197 lot 567F 1.03 5292 734 lot 1 21 .33 5292 734 lot 6B 28.31 43581 196 lot 653 4.50 5292 734 lot 5 10.18 E 7, it Cli v— ",-j '4-2aj wtiart %0fr 32 'k, CU z J. Long.Pt N L almer 1 a'Pick Y-1 pt st an M5 J'IV T, IV T C9tavqlave ol v, V —a wafni l3k,\ Ij 36 Beth 'al mer /Pond /AV : "k, ea Littles pt 6ff J Rock �ip Lincoln House t obta Aed pt so Rock alloupes Pt X& it r t N UNI]psi t ru o f f t s{ Y k ew*@]i k � Nr � x a f z t . ,SFr vv^ry J.1 are `ti .a' .+ t w s .yxC $$^ m,C ��5 ' 's" C{ a ,� !d^#.'a �s" p+ f"' i �rt w X.. YY.L ;+•a a,� , � a Ba.•dfe`�.'. � �' ..+'77��E--�m 1 .. i` t�',�$ Y d kk &�' 2. r Fx!"•r + fi `x xiA Yr ��d qua l�• '"�t�# i3 "'v"'_ f ��'a}Fm T�"_' '�^� { a'p�'.Y ��t'a Y 4 }''�*W VS"f .+� 4:•�e-*it�-�?[ � � � . � [,4 tv 4A. F� *n e. � kc �a... Mi•> ;b'` t A pkc �..xf't �`Y f Y 9 ✓]r" % ayb ^ ,u � � 14n] � I '4 � '']`IT] U lt.,.'F 4 ♦ A jY4: .N NY.- K �q.� � '� !f't +�, # � 'Pa•� . . . r #A k r V 4+g 't ,i> a .. e�Yy "k v � '�'�.� r �.r� ��} 1��#�L= ♦ ms's x�- si' $�41tNtj 41 y'3tRr�'¢�' ?+-- i •+ � �`}�- p�. �f� ., £ � �' � RAF] 2r 'p F.1 Y, 3 � •M � d �, '� t r"� z . t ��r-" eti �hae..✓��-°Yir ,T � .3Ar _a { s t rr. r : y, N an�"""� 1 i, b,�, x 7 A", /X c.Al ANDIDN"D. CORTUE, No. Gammie sinner " 7271194 935-2160 April 27, 1984 Mr. Cerard McNeil RE: SALEMNETLANDS 290 Eliot St . File 064-92 Ashland , MA 01721 Highlaid Ave. Dear Mr. McNeil: The Northeast Regional Metropolitan Boston Office of the Department of Environ- mental Quality Engineering has completed its review of: the above-referenced file. Pursuant to G.L. Chapter 131 , Section 40 and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, the Department is denying implementation of the project as proposed for the reason:; outlined below. Correspondence from you has questioned the applicabildtn. of the "new" (effective date April 1 , 1983) Wetlands Protection Act Regulations and LAC Validity of the appeal taken in this matter by Purity Supreme. The effective date of the "new" regulations was April 1 , 1983. Your Notice of Intent, sent to the Boston Office of the Dapart- ment ,was postmarked April 4, 1983. Regarding the filing of a Notice of Intent, the Act states: "Copies of such Notice shall he sent to the Conservation Commission" and "at. tiie same time by certified mail to the Department of Environmental Quality Enginearinn". The Department therefore feels this project is regulatable under the April 1 , 1983 regulations. It should be noted that as early as April 26, 1983, this office, in a comment to the ?EPA Unit of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, went on record as being of the position that this filing was subject to the April 1, 1983 regulations . It should a] so be noted that as of April 26, 1983, no Notice of intanc from you had been received by this office (it was received here on April 27 , 1983) and that the receipt of your application was mailed to you from this office on May 4, 1983. Tlie Department considers tho appeal taken in this matter by the Purity Supreme, Lac. valid , arriving as it did within the ten day time limit and being from an abutter with a long term lease (extending until the year 1999 , with three five your options) . No information was presented to this office during the ten day appeal period opposing the appeal taken by Purity Supreme on a procedural basis. it is important to note that due to the significant adverse impacts to the interests of the Wetlands Protection Act , namely flood control, storm damage preventicn, and prevention of pollution and the sinnificant adverse impact to bordering vegetated wetland in excess of those alloyadby the performance standards stipulated in 310 (HR 10.55 (4) , the Department would also have appealed the Order issued by the Salem Conservation Commission allowing the project as proposed . To compensate for increaneq in peak dischacges caused by the future development of this 150 acre parcel, you have proposed to create retention ponds in areas that currently support mat"re emerpent, scrub-shrub and forested wetlands bordering on, streams. T"is process of crencing ponds rmuirvs excavation in each of these areas and. taking the cluvatinn of these arcrts dowq ovcr a range of one-half Coot to six feet vnr-- tically from their existing elevations. Fror the informarbon pr("ented by you in 1he En- vironmental impact Report. of August, 1981 (P.OEA #4573) a conservation estimate for the amount of wetlands to he excavated is approximately eleven acres (from table 4-5 in the E:IR) . This is far in excess of the amount allowed by 310 CMR 10.55. Therefore the proposed project must be denied as proposed . The Department feels that at a site of this size, development could occur which would not impact wetlands to an extent prohibited by the Wetland Protection Act Regulations. Therefore the project is denied without prejudice. - It: is the Department's a deastandius that at this time you have decided not to build the proposed golf: course. The plans ;and written material presented to this office regarding the development of the golf course are extremely vague. From the best available information, the Department has determined that the prbPosed course would also alter an amount of resource area in excess of that allowed by 310 Chit, 10.55. Therefore, the Department at this time is also denying implemenLation of the plans for the golf course: under Chapter 131, Section 40. Please be acv_esed that it has been the Department's responsibility to address those interests or the Act which are potentially affected by the project, to determine how those interests should be protected and to condition the project as necessary to insure that protect- fon. ' Should any party dispute these findings - �, , your attention is directed to the. attached "NOTICE" regarding an adjudicating hearing. Should a hearing be requested, factual material supporting the objection must be supplied to the Department. Should you have any further questions on this matter, please contact Mr. Phil DiPietro at this address or phone 935-2160. Very truly yours, William A. Krol, P.E. Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer WAK/PD/f,& cc: Salem Conservation Commission. Town Ha.Ll Salem, ?L% 01970, Ann: Glenn Yale, Chairman, Charles Fedrickson Agent Atty. Kathryn Walsh, Brow, Rudnick. Freed & Cesmer, Counsellors At Lace Atty. John R. Serafini , A m. at Law, Federal St . , Salem, Air? 01970 i Form 5 -� otc�-r��, vo 64-92 _-] Z.{. (To be provided by DEOL) SALE Cor nrronwo3t;lh - —. of Ivtassachusetiss FAFARD COMPANIES -5 Order of Ccrlditions [,.Plassachusetts Wetiaflds Protection Act G.L. c. 131 , §40 Department of Environmental Quel.ity Enoineering From- - - --- - ---- ... - - - ------- -- --- - To -_ Mr. Gerard McNeil - 'Phe 1 tfard Companies (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) 290 Eliot St. , Ashland , ?IA 290 E] Lot St . , Ashland, PIA Address - --- -- - - - Ad:±reHs -- - -------------- 1 his Order is issued and delivered as follcra 17 by hand delivery to applicant of represenlati,e r. _ _._ ____________- -_(da?e) L7 (date) This pfeject islocated at.lfighland Ave. , The property is recorded at the neg!stry of... _... Essex Book- 5292, 6172___ - page- -734, 73 Certificate(it registered) The Notice of intent for this project was filed on -.-_ April 4, ...1984_._-_ —_.__— (date) The public hearing was closed on_ ___.ar.unr-y 12, 1901' (date) Plndings Dept. of Env. Quality EnQ. n,isreviewed the above-referenced Notice of The- ------- - - -- = -... Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on thr protect. Based on the information available to the Deot. of Env_ Qua,1_,-_Eng.,_atthis time, Via - .DI-at..__D _Eav,_-Lval _ Eng hasdeterminedthat the area on which the proposed work is to be done is siq^ifocant to the f: tlowing interests In accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth. iii the; rec;u!a".ions for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(clieck as appropriate). D� Public waoa,supply xs S?orm d .maye pre:enhon - Prv3r:B war,-r supply Prevention of o:lu"ion ]y Ground water supply Land containing sheillish y �.il Flood control Fisheries Page 2. ORDER OF COMMONS Findings Continued The Department of Environmentnt Quality Engineering hereby finds that the denial of this project for the following reasons is necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations to protect the above-- enumerated interests: The project involves the excavatin., of and stripping of vegetation within approximately eleven acres of bordering vegetated wetlands. This is far in excess of the performance standards stipulated in 310 CMR 10.55. Therefore, the project is denied as proposed without prejudice. Findings Pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 30 Section 61 to 62p Inclusive (N.E.P.A. ) A Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for this project was filed on August 31 , 1984 , with the Secretary of Environmental Affairs. Said FE7R, EOEA 414573, described the environmental- impact of this project and sets forth those measures necessary to minimize and prevent any potential significant adverse impacts to the environment. Said measures were reflected in the conditions of the Secretary's findings issued on October 17, 1984, stating that the report adequately and properly complied with G.L. Chapter 30, Section 62 to 62H inclusive. Issued by the Dapartnuefit of Eir'llunniculal Qtj:ili!Y E.n01102 Signature_ ILl;_e CLI;17e e On this day of Apt-i,I19 84 b,Acre tire Personally appealed.-- -1d-i1J-1.am.,A. Ki-ol,1q,', l)0l)jII:y Ro�iona) Enor described in and wjjoc>:oc�Utcd it)(-, for(, M me known to be the Person as his/her free act and (1(�. (I jum(i and ackflowledged that he/she executed the. &Ine Notary Public My c(,TfI,IIff.;I0n expires The app,is cant,the owner,any Peron a,�gnev(:t;bv b,s,r,, II!Order any Owner ofland albuting the,land IsPoIlY.hich the pro- . ,fs posed work is to be don,or„,y ton pi,,,Sons purs;"3111 to G.L. c 30A. §I OA,are hereby notified of their right lo request I, Y hearing pursuant to G.L.30A §10.provi(jinij;is,, I a d, cf,it from the date of issuanc,of Is,�,;rjro resincst's made by certified mail or hind delivery to the Department within tell day; s,ijj,�j of d,,r Environmenial quality Engin�,on,),Or,(!Winin,Str(!C:and is acfdre,',9i'd 10 Decker Clerk,Office.of General Counsel, Department or certified mail or hand delivery if,I nostrin. ,1A 0.2 1 C�,B A copy c.1 the request shall ri the same tirria be sorl by servanou i"Iss"so" 11's `;);sk "It ):rif�ioy olher art A Notice of Claim for an A(Jj(jdjc:nI(Ij), HjjI,(j, 1,01(6),and shell contain Ill,f,11 . :��;�T!:fl� ,!is ttw flulu.,for A(Jjno,,:,to,y Proceedings,310 CMH(,�Vjnq Ink,rinor.r. (a) the DECE INel finds Flu NLICslbljr.nail"Of 11n ''i "I's it.md e,,W, tho (b) the complete rm,ne. rri ",t I . 11011i 11I�, and.If fe;)Iesc;n'ud by counsel. tes name and address of the k;lorn,?y, (c) the names"n(j:eIdn2s;!,, of dl r,thio nw (d) a clr!lr and coiwlso Slatenwint 0(1)Ithq lsl� hr rroc oedrnq,(2)tho oi,jections to the SuPrfneI Onjer, including sf),2r,ijtca!jy life r,riblet,it bemssk ,jqjjj the UOPallfut,111 s Wetlands RegOations(31 U CfVIR 10 00)ofid duwnet oatntp do s th"; ...Is., q,;, ,I!hv A(-t, dicatory leoring. I I.Clfll ;illy tIll 1 1, ;IIId(-i)if!r relief Snught 11WOUgh the�J(JJU- iwd is III( OfceF. ':is::':1' 1' "'I il'n:dlur and each other P;,rty or ep- nesentative of s1r;f,1):::1, It r Failure to s.ubmit all .......11'('11 111;1, sI hY'�It!nip. f; wr:t of tf,Q Notice Q!Cisism to.'an Arijudicalory Heaney Detach on dotted line and submit to file Prior to commencement of work- ...............................I......I........ . .............. .......... ... ....... ... ............ .................................................................. To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for If,P:Qj,Cf;,t File Number ___..__has been iecderst the flegisoyrui and hasbeen noted in th,chain of tjllc!of -'MbGerund Condirun 13 or, 11 recorded land, the inSImment f,,,rvhnl which 161W.ro". Ih,s If registered lane!, the docusi-tto,ij whi.-,Ii dentriq—,III, tr,osIt fion 4s ------------ Aiploicant 5 r U CRWITN TP OF ;1SqcpUjFjp PUPPR EPT U Fru If W FrTt I PUL I TV Err I;TFp I I r rFFIrF PF CRUpi mirspi (to Pinter Strpot Reston, prosachusotts p?Ipp Weplone (riQ po?-,56p PVTjCF No Prr CCITUT OF rCTICF OF CUP FPP [PAPICATOPY RUP TrF "FTI NIU PPCTFCTTPI ACT, rL j , P. 10.1 s S'AO Tif i-ppartnont of Wirnmipnpi PUMP, Spineprinn's "Pulls for AdjurIcatrry Procrpo- ings, - a1r pr 1W, rrquirp that certain information Me suhAttre as Fart. Of a rQquest, for an adjudicatpry hrorinq on a Sunprwinq Oder of ropritions iss"ce KY th; Peparbirpt. under t1w hatlands Protection Act. This infrnmation is necessarl, to ensure that each rc- qurst for a Wrinn nay he WnrilpO rfficuntly and tiny ter rint-ts of all jartips are nrn- WNW Failure to sunhit all Of tho necessary arta may result in nignisspl by the Wrartment of thp rpqu-st for a Iarinn. The Lay clemvnts Rich Pre rcquirpo are a stptrnprt Of the facts exPlPininn My to irrsnn rrquesting a Aparinq clains that the Superspoing rider should tp chapypd rdq,:Q it ShOuld hP Channpri to, t simple Pnunnration of thrpuplir internstjopntifirs-if the !''rt_ lands Protection Pct will not, hr sufficient. s A POtice of Clain for kJoicatory Fearing must includc' the follolAnr infnmAtion- (1 ) P title "hick indicates the name of tic cast (i .o. , rFfT Mims HIS fpmhrr City/Town, vane of • , (2) Do ronpktr namp, address W tplrphonp ru%kr Of thr party filinn the rocurst for a hearing one, if represented by counsel , the nanp ann address of thr atternny-, (2) The r000s WO Wressr, of all othur rprtics W� their rfprrsrotatiwns , if NO (4) 1 clear stateipnt that a formal adjudicRtnry hearing is being requested: (F) f clear and concise Statement of the cnjections to the Supprscdinq Vrdrr - (6) P clopr and concise statn"ent Of thu facts PPOr which the rtqupst for a Marino is haspo, P claar ano concise gtatpnnnt Of thn QWs P 'Tick are snuaht in the Crdpr, and P sta"w"t that 0 CKT of fir request is Kpinn sent at thv.- "w;f. ti,-It, to t1h(- or"'c"t , thn conservation ce"`i0siOr and eark othor rArty rr of the porty, it kneym,. P WNW & Clain for P"judicRUry 1 Parinq nest vn filoo 1: i1' irri ousinf-, t, .;s rf Onto Of issuance of Sp Sprprsrpirn Neer and nost on sent tn: Sozenno Cprrrvplr ., rpcppt rjr ri DUMP of upprAl Cnursol rapprtopnt of Qvirenhontol fvplity rygivarrinr Ono Antpr Strcpt v0stro , of PAR Form 71 E C 'E a �� L o DEOE File No. 64-92 -1 SEP E P 2 c U 1900 (To be provided by DE-OE) %Commonwealth G Ciryrtown Salem lug lof Massachusetts f'' ,'� 7 aa°'�'i°t� IN. Fafard Companies �1h511•i: r1 L•"n'ESt`91 J... APPlicant Extension Permit Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L. c. 131, §40 From Department of Environmental Protection ilssuingAuthority TO, Fafard Companies 290 Eliot St. , Ashland, MA 01721 (Name) (Address) The Order of Conditions(or Extension Permit)issued on October 4. 1984 (date) to Fafard Companies (name)for work at Highland 'Avenue Sn 1 am_ MA (address)is hereby extended for period of m�„-oA (i year(s)from the date it expires. This Extension Permit will expire on October 4, 1993 (date) This document shall be recorded in accordance with General Condition 8 of the Order of Conditions. ...................................................................................'-.--........................................................._....._...................... (Leave Space Blank) ' 7.1 Issued by Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Regional Engineer for Resource Protection Signatures) When issued by the Conservation Commission this Lxtension Permit must be signed by a majority of its members. T On thisdayof September , 19 90 before me personally appeared Sabin M. Lord Jr. RE for Resource ProtectioQomeknown tobethe person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and dee . V 0e Notary Public My commission expires, Detach on dotted line and submit to the prior to commencement of work .. ......_............ ____. To Issuing Authority - Please be advised that the Extension Permit to the Order of Conditions for the project at File Nmnber has been recorded at the Registry of - end has been noted in the chain of titre of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 of the original order of conditions on 19 It recorded land,the instrument number which identifies this transaction is If registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction is Signature ApDliwnt 72 it I Form 7 y� DEGE File No. ` \ (To be provided by DEQE) Commonwealth City/Town Salem of Massachusetts Applicant (iron Warren Extension Permit Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L. c. 131, §40 Department of Environmental Quality Engineering From: Issuing Authority TO: Fafard Companies, Att: Ronald Killian 290 Elliot St. , Ashland, MA 01721 (Name) I (Address) The Order of Conditions(or Extension Permit)issued on October 4, 1984 (date) to Greg Warren (name)forworkat Highland Avpnup Salem, Mass. (address)is hereby extended for a period of Three(3) years)from the date it expires. October 4, 1990 :This Extension Permit will expire on (date) This document shall be recorded in accordance with General Condition 8 of the Order of Conditions. ....................................................................................................................................................................................... (Leave Space Blank) 7_t Issued by Sabin M Lord Jr Denuty RegionalEnvironmental Engineer Signature(s) When issued by the Conservation Commission this Extension Permit must be signed by a majority of its members. / 1 August 87 On this a�'LHfrt -Jr ,19-, before me personally appeared to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed thesameas his/her-free act and deed. NotaicMy commission expires � s Detach on dotted line and submit to the prior to commencement of work. ..............................................................................»........................................_................................................_--............_.....w.__ To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Extension Permit to the Order of Conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of a d has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 6 of the original order of conditions an 19 If recorded land,the instrument number which identifies this transaction is If registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction is Signature Applicant 7-2 • ( Salem. Massachusetts 01970 ASS�tN�y Department of Environmental Management Wetlands Divisions Northeast Regional Office 5 Commonwealth Avenue , Woburn, MA 01801 Dear Sir/Madame: In accordance with Special Condition #11 of DEQE's Superseding Order of Conditions 64-92, the Fafard Companies, Inc. submitted information to be reviewed by the Salem Conservation Commission regarding proposed construction of a Somerville Lumber retail store and warehouse and a retail stores building. At a meeting held on July 27, 1989, the Conservation Commission noted that the proposed work is in accordance with previously approved • filings and will not adversely affect any resource area. Therefore, it is the Commission's recommendation that no additional filings or conditions be required for this project. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, John Vallis ',!^i�,'1� Chairman 4 ,dppi r * r417 n,� J� �4 THE FAFARD COMPANIES C, V LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 290 Eliot Street - r Ashland,MA 01721 ,J U l 7 0 IC`� DATE 6•/6 •" JOB- NO. 0 l (508)881.1800 -,,ATTENTION ATTENTION To s/�, ja�/� r u/sf • P. , ,b [ P /er4t Urya� a"'f�f e i L" �` c g I 5&u zk4 Olf-26 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU P Attached ❑ Under separate cover via - the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples - ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order �•C S COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION lD •y8 Gil ?, S THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 13Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ` Q9 As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return — corrected prints (❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS s COPY TO SIGNED: v 12 Grand Turk Way Salem, Ma 01970 July 17, 1989 Walter Power Chairman Salem Planning Board 18 Loring Ave. Salem, Ma 01970 Re: Proposed Somerville Lumber consturction project Dear Mr. Power, Please be informed that, as residents of the Sanctuary Condominium in Salem, we are opposed to the proposed construction of the massive Somerville Lumber warehouse/store on the hill overlooking Traders Way, Frist Street and Whalers Lane. Our greatest concern is the increased traffic (especially numerous large trailor trucks) this construction would cause on First Street and Traders Way, and the resulting noise and pollution, not to mention the threat to the safety of the many children who live in this residential area. Of course our other concern is how this huge commercial/industrial operation will effect the value of the condominium and the quality of life here, which at the present time is most enjoyable. A We would appreciate your most careful consideration in evaluating all aspects of this construction project and its threatening effect on our condominium community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jane Earp Paul Moloney cc:Mayor Salvo,M.Cunningham,A. Burns,L.Vaughan,R.Williams,K.Prentakis,C.Puleo, W.Lester,Salem Conservation Committee,S.Hallett,E.Phillips,I.Kusinitz Ec JUL r ITS se a WE , THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE DEVELOI:::'MEN-1 OF THE SOMERVILLE LUMBER COMPANY PROPOSED RETAIL/STORAGE FACILITY AT TRADER' S WAY AND FIRST STREET, SALEM, OPERATING SEVEN (7) DAYS A WEEK , BASED ON THE TRAFFIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IT WILL GENERATE. WE CITE THE USE REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF SALEM ZONING BY - LAWS, BUSINESS PARKS DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS SECTION, SUBSECTION 3, WHICH STATES, IN PERTINENT PART, . . .PROVIDED THAT SUCH OPERATIONS. 3) "ARE NOT OFFENSIVE, DETRIMENTAL, INaURIOUS, NOXIOUS, OR HAZARDOUS BY REASON OF CAUSING DUST, SMOKE, ODOR, FUMES, RADIATION, GROUND WATER DISCHARGE, NOISE, VIBRATION, TRAFFIC CONGESTION, OR OTHER NUISANCE. " NAME ADDRESS / � Z'u /J � THE FAFARD COMPANIES RE CE ! ," E D 290 Eliot Street/Ashland,MA 01721 908-881-1600 J U N 0 9 i.`niCj Fax#508-875-BB10 SALEM PL�a�nINU ��:PT. H.A. Fafard 6 Sons Construction, Inc. Ledgemere Land Corporation Fafard Real Estate Interiors June 9, 1989 Town Line Associates, Inc. Ms. Kathy Winn, Administrator Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: DEQE #64-92, Somerville Lumber, 50 Traders Way and Retail Stores Building, 20 Traders Way Dear Ms. Winn: Following Special Condition #11 of the Superseding Order of Conditions #64-92, issued to The Fafard Companies for the "Highland Avenue" project, I hereby request the Conservation Commission (and DEQE) review the enclosed information being filed for Site Plan Review on the Somerville ,. Lumber and general retail building projects. I,1� The total square footage of the Somerville Lumber and general retail buildings is less than that of the "typical" buildings shown for the same site on the enclosed 1984 P.U.D. plans (89,000 SF vs. 60,000 SF and 24,000 SF vs. 65,000 SF = 113,000 SF vs. 125,000 SF) . Their construction and use will not affect adversely any resource area covered under #64-92 or any other resource area. Site drainage will be directed into the existing Traders Way system that drains under First Street and onto land east of Whalers Lane, and into a detention basin to be constructed in the northwest corner of Traders Way and First Street. 1 therefore request that after reviewing the enclosed information, the Commission recommend to DEQE that no additional conditions or filings be required for this project, and that DEQE then confirm that recommendation. We look forward to discussing this with the Commission at its June 22, 1989 meeting. Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this project. Yours Ronald S. Killian Planning and Land Use Coordinator RSK/mbt Enclosure cc: Salem Planning Department John Serafini, Sr. , Esq. DEQE, Northeast Region, Woburn THE FAFARD COMPANIES 290 Eliot Street/Ashland,MA 01721 50B-BBI-1600 Fax#5OB-875-8610 H.A. Fafard 6 Sons Construction, Inc. Ledgemere Land Corporation Fafard Real Estate Interiors June 9 , 1989 Town Line Associates, Inc. Ms. Beth Debski Salem Planning Department One, Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: Somerville Lumber Store & Warehouse, 50 Traders Way Retail Stores, 20 Traders Way Dear Ms. Debski : The Fafard Companies proposes to construct a Somerville Lumber retail store and warehouse and a retail stores building adjacent to Matt Garrett's Restaurant, all located on our Industrial (I ) zoned Traders Way property. The following information summarizes specific matters as required under Section VIII R.j . for Site Plan Review. Enclosed items include seven sets of: Site/landscaping area plan; Responses to P.U.D. Special Permit Conditions; Responses to Board of Health standard review items; Review request letter to Conservation Commission and DEQE. The P.G.D./Site Plan Review Fee for the entire site was paid in full on 4/24/84 (519 ,750) , as I confirmed with you last year . a. Buildings One 96,000 SF retail-warehouse building for Somerville Lumber, which sells a full line of home improvement and lumber products, will be constructed on the 13+ acre site, bounded by First Street, Traders Way, private property, and land owned by Howard A. Fafard. The main building will be a maximum 24 feet high with color-coated panels for the exterior walls and roof, except for a cedar-shingled entry. The front 57 ,000 sf section houses the 50 ,000 sf general sales section and 7,000 sf of office space, while the rear 39 ,000 sf warehouse section (maximum 30 feet high) contains the extra inventory of store items. The two metal storage canopies (150' x 40 ' x 18' high) , located on the north side of the sales area, will be used to store lumber products . Somerville Lumber's 96,000 SF compares favorably with the 60,000 SF typical building shown on the approved 1984 Highland Acre P.G.D. plans dated 11/15/83. Ms. Beth Debski ,June 9, 1989 Page 2 A second 24,000 SF general retail stores building will be constructed at 20 Traders Way between Somerville Lumber and Matt Garrett ' s Restaurant. This one story building is smaller than the proposed typical building for this location (24 ,000 SF vs. 65,000 SF) . It will be 16- feet high, with decorative block exterior and mansard roof . The types of retail tenants expected to lease space in the building include clothing, shoes, dry cleaning, books, stationary, records, florist, electronics . See the site plan and architectural plans for details . b. Parking and Loading The 365 Somerville Lumber parking spaces are shown on the site plan along the north and east sides of the building. This number is considered more than adequate, based on 1987 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin parking space demand data generated at the Somerville Lumber Store in Seekonk, MA. The 108 ,500 sf facility generated a maximum 220 filled parking spaces during the Saturday peak hour. That translates into 194 spaces for the 96,000 sf Salem store. Four loading docks are found along the westerly portion of the warehouse . Three drive-in doors are located on the northerly and easterly sides of the warehouse for customer loading and deliveries . All of these docks and doors are located away from First Street and the Whalers Lane condominiums . Store operations will occur Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. -9:00 p.m. , Saturday, 7 :30 a.m.-9:00 p.m. , and Sunday, noon-5:00 p.m. The retail building will have 128 parking spaces to accommodate customers and employees . Operating hours and number of delivery trucks and employees will depend on the tenants utilizing the building. c . Traffic and Circulation Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation, 4th edition ( 1987 ) , the average Saturday (peak day) vehicle trips to and from Somerville Lumber is estimated at 2969 trips per day (ADT) . This total is assumed to be conservative for two reasons . First, it is assumed that all trips generated ,by Somerville Lumber are new trips: discounting any "through' or "pass by" vehicle trips . These impulse and diverted trips could account for as much as 50% of the total trips generated. Ms . Beth Debski June 9 , 1989 Page 3 Second, trip generation data developed in 1987 for Somerville Lumber by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. indicate that the ITE-based calculations may overestimate actual traffic generation. The larger 108,500 sf Seekonk, MA and Pelham, NH stores generated 3100 and 3200 ADT respectively versus the ITE estimate of 3355 ADT. The smaller Salem store therefore could be expected to generate about 2787 ADT vs. 2969 ADT estimated by ITE data. About 140 employees will work at this store: 25 warehouse employees and truck drivers; 30 office workers and cashiers; and 85 salespeople . The 24 ,000 sf retail building is expected to generate an estimated 976 average daily trips . Access to the building site will be via two driveways from Traders Way as shown on the site plan. Delivery trucks will enter and leave via Traders Way and Highland Avenue (Route 107) . Trucks will enter the Somerville Lumber site using the drive at the northeast corner of the lot, over 6000 feet north of Whalers Lane, stop at the loading docks along the westerly portion of the warehouse, and then return to Traders Way via the same route along the northerly side of the building. The drive along the southerly side of the building, closest to First Street, will be used only for emergency access . The 10 company trucks generally leave about 8:00 a.m. to make deliveries; they are loaded before the end of the previous day' s work. About five vendor deliveries per weekday and two company truck deliveries per day, Monday through Saturday, are expected, all during normal business hours . Retail building delivery trucks also will use the Highland Avenue-Traders Way route. All drives are 24 feet wide and paved with bituminous concrete. d. External Lighting External lighting has been located to minimize glare in the direction of the residential condominium development to the south across First Street. Cutoff luminaires on 30 foot light poles and on the buildings ' walls will be used for this purpose . e. Landscaping and Screening As shown on the site plan, a landscaped berm and fence will be constructed along Somerville Lumber ' s southerly driveway to provide a visual and sound Ms . Beth Debski June 9. 1989 Page 4 buffer for the condominium residents across First Street. The 5+ foot high berm will be topped with a fence and evergreen plantings. Suitable landscaping will be provided for both buildings and parking areas including juniper and woodbine vine along the southerly slope along First Street. f . Utilities Separate water lines for each of the two buildings will tie into the 12" main available along Trader' s Way. Separate 6" gravity sewer lines will tie into the 8" Traders Way line. The estimated sewage flow for the Somerville Lumber and the 24 ,000 sf retail store are 2650 gpd and 1200 gpd respectively. - Both buildings are covered under Mass. Division of Water Pollution Control Sewer Extension-Connection Permit No. 31 . Gas service will be provided by Boston Gas . Electric service will come from Massachusetts Electric service on Traders Way. g. Snow Removal Snow will be plowed off all drives and parking areas into the designated snow storage areas (see site plan) . Detention basin capacity is designed to handle accumulated snow melt. h. Natural Area Protection and Enhancement The 13+ acre Somerville Lumber area is an almost totally disturbed site. Landscaping will enhance this development, as well as the 3_ acre general retail building site . About 3000 (3.9 acres ) of the 13+ acre Somerville Lumber site will remain without buildings or pavement. with 16% (2 . 1 acres ) for building coverage (maximum 45% lot coverage permitted by zoning) . About 32% (3.7 acres ) of the 4 .5+ acre retail building - Matt Garrett' s parcel will remain without buildings or pavement, with 15% ( . 7 acres) for building coverage. i , Architectural Compatibility_ There is no significant prevalent architectural style in the immediate vicinity. The Somerville Lumber building will have color-coated panels for its sides and roof . except for the cedar-shingled entry. Ms . Beth Debski ,June 9, 1989 Page 5 The general retail building will be compatible architecturally with its neighboring commercial buildings. While the final design has not been completed, it is expected to show a decorative block exterior and mansard roof . SUMMARY The Somerville Lumber and retail building operations will improve the site condition of this property and contribute to the City' s economic and employment growth, business diversity, and financial well-being. Respectfully submitted, Ronald S. Killian Planning and Land Use Coordinator RSK/mbt cc: John Serafini , Sr. , Esq. Ronald S. Killian The Fafard Companies June 9, 1989 SALEM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT April 3, 1984 Special Permit Conditions Responses for Somerville Lumber and Retail Stores Building II . A. The Planning Department staff has been requested by the Board to re-evaluate traffic flow and conditions in the area in order to determine whether the proposed Walter' s Way access is necessary. B. The Somerville Lumber main building will be 24 feet high, the warehouse 30 feet high. The retail building will be about 16+' high. All buildings are within the P.U.D. 30 foot height limit (Industrial (I ) zoning permits up to 45 feet) . , C. Parking requirements are met as follows for the two buildings: Somerville Retail Existing _Lumber Building Restaurant 1 . Retail Space (50 ,000 SF) = 297 spaces 128 1 space per 150 SF non- storage GFA (44,500) 2. Warehouse Space (39,000 SF) 1 space per company vehicle(10) = 1.0 spaces 1 space per 2 employees(55) = 28 spaces 1 space per 1000 SF of non- storage GFA (0 SF) 0 spaces 3. Office Space (7 ,000 SF) 1 space per employee (30) = 30 spaces Sub-Total 365 spaces 128 68 Est. peak-hour parking demand(Sat . ) 194 spaces* TOTAL REQUIRED 561 spaces TOTAL PROPOSED spaces ( including 10 handicapped) *Based on Vanasse Hanged Brustlin data from Somerville Lumber site in Seekonk. MA (1987 ) : 220 parking spaces used at the 108,500 sf store. Somerville Retail Existing Lumber Building Restaurant 3. Loading requirements: REQUIRED loading bays: - wholesale and storage NONE -- -- - retail NONE NONE -- - restaurant -- -- NONE PROPOSED loading bays: 7 bays 0 0 D. ,E. The existing CVS building is 47,206 SF. Shaw's Supermarket will be 46,900 SF. The proposed Somerville Lumber' s retail portion of the building will be 44,500 SF, with the proposed retail building at 24,000 SF. The total square footage of the four P.U.D. facilities, 162,606 SF, is within the PUD' s maximum GFA of 395,000 SF and Retail/Industrial use GFA ratio of .88 (162,606 SF retail vs. 185,000 SF max. ) . The Somerville Lumber warehouse and office sections fall within the 210,000 SF of non-retail space permitted under the P.U.D. E. The GFA ratio of .88 is not exceeded. 162,606 SF retail = .77 210,000 SF non-retail F. N/A. F1 . Matt Garrett's Restaurant (8500 SF under construction) is within the P.U.D. ' s 22,200 SF Commercial GFA Condition applicable to the non-P.U.D. Highland Avenue property. G. Site plan and landscaping plan were filed June 9, 1989 in accordance with this subsection. No trails or open space accesses are desirable on this parcel . H. N/A. H1 . N/A. I . O.K. I1 . O.K. J. O.K. K. O.K. L. General PUD site construction and a 47,000 square foot retail building with a parking area were begun before April 3, 1986, as required under this subsection. M. N/A. Repoft for Site Examination for Well No. 2 Pump Test Evaluation of Potential Impacts to Well from Contamination Sources Surface Sources The Vinnin Square area represents the greatest potential from surface contamination. The area has a very high traffic flow and has a large paved parking area which is drained directly to the ponds adjacent to the proposed well . The records from the water quality monitoring should be reviewed to evaluate the effect of deicing materials used on the roads and the other paved areas as well as other indicator compounds which may be getting into the aquifer system. Subsurface Sources The golf course and the underground fuel storage tanks would appear to be the primary sites which could have an effect on the water quality from a production well . We anticipate that the Zone 2 delineation will include an area south of the well within north-south axis through the two ponds, then bending easterly toward the golf course. we anticipate that aquifer will be relatively narrow and bounded by step bedrock barriers on the easterly and westerly sides. Because of the lateral bedrock barriers, we anticipate that a significant recharge for the production well is from the area under the golf course. of secondary concern is the single family residential development south of Pond 1 with the potential for direct discharge to the production aquifer from improper waste disposal . Of lesser concern the activity at the Legg Hill site which appears to include the dumping of construction and demolition materials as well as the reported .disposal of ash from the power plant. We do not feel that there is any significant recharge from this direction because of the exposed bedrock at the site in the direction of the well . This would not preclude the possibility of a pollutant entering the production aquifer through a rock fracture, thus effecting the water quality. A geologist's review of the- site during Zone 2 delineation would be appropriate to evaluate the evidence indicating the direction that rock fracturing might be anticipated . Potential Sources of Contamination The majority of the area, within the one half mile radius, is used for residential purposes. Nearly all of these residences are sewered by the municipalities of Salem, Swampscott and Marblehead. Thirty seven single family houses are served by on-site septic systems. These houses are located about 700 feet south of the well site and are in the longitudinal axis of the estimated Zone 2 area and could be a source of contamination by improper disposal of waste products through the household drainage system. The surface drainage through Zone 2 is from south to north passing through two ponds just upstream of the well site. Water quality in the ponds has been monitored by the City of Salem as a result .of Salem Conservation Commission Order of Conditions related to work performed in the construction of drainage at Vinnin Square shopping plaza. The surface and subsurface drainage from the Vinnin Square area represents a significant potential for well contamination from surface spills or from underground storage from three gasoline service stations. The two Mobil stations have had the fuel storage tanks replaced recently. The third service station in Vinnin Square (Texaco) which is owned by Hur.saw Oil Corporation is the site of a soil/water contamination by petroleum products. The contamination was discovered on April 4, 1989 during the replacement of underground fuel storage tanks. Another groundwater contamination site has been identified by Haley and Aldrich at the Vinnin Square Shopping Plaza. This site is listed "to be investigated by D. E.Q. E. (Hazardous Waste) " . This site is listed as 3-2080 by D. E.Q. E. The Tedesco Country Club is also a potential contamination source from possible use of herbicides and pesticides. An interview with the present grounds manager indicates that there is a good record of recent applications. The site has a production well which is used for irrigation and may be a good indication of groundwater at that site. The final area of concern is Legg Hill , which has been excavated for gravel removal , has been the site of dumping of construction debris and demolition material . It is reported that ash from the Salem Harbor generating station operated by New England Electric has been dumped at the site. This location is northeast of the wall site and probably outside the Zone 2 of the well . Interviews with the Fire Department of the three municipalities indicates that there has been no other recent problem with underground storage or other notable incidents. HALEY AND WARD, INC. CIVIL AND ENVInONMENTAL ENMNEFnS 25 rox nOAn WAI.IIIAM,MASS.()P151 tot 71 MO Jgn(1 Jelly 6, 1987 WIIhrlr 6 Rnq,,rII , Clint tin An Ron r(I of Water 6 Bewrr CommlggIAtlrrq Towel- Way Marbirllend , MA Re: Prellminnry Report AT'1'N: barn E. Snow Loring Ave, & Thompgon 's Superintendent Mead ow (MAR-393) Gentlemen : The Town of NarhlrhrA(I , nn pnrt: of their Agreement when the Town - Jotned the Metropolitan District COmmtggf011 water system, abandoned two existing water supply gourren and pumping gtAtlOAq. Ilnle.y and Ward , Inc. haq been engaged to prepare An engineering report on the feasthlllty of re-activAllnp thoge two glleq, I .e. Loring Ave. (Leyg'r 11111 ) and Thompson 's Meadow. We llnvr romplrfed all snmpling Anil teq[I.ng of surface and ground water qupplleg nt the Loring Ave. Bite And All sampllnl, and testing of qur(nce wnter ;,)nreeq At the Thnmpgnn 'q IlrndOw well git:e And gubmi.t t:he following repnt:L for your review: A. Lorinl, Ave . (l.rgg'A III.1t) StLe Sampleq tnken from the pond ndlncent to the existing dug well and from 2-1 /2" ohservniton wells At five l.ocAtionn adjacent to the (Ing well indtente A very high level of Iron, a high level of sodlnm and mvrggnege and a very hard water. Purl hrrmore, the gnlfnte level, is high enough to Add to hnrdurgs problrmq nod the color Index in high (70 At Dug Wel.l.). The iron, maganege and color index )rvelq Are signiflcnntly lower the Further you proceed from Lhe (Ing well (witness; 0. 15 mg/I of Iron, 0. 17 mg/1 manganese, 0 touts of color At 0.14. #5 As compared to 12.62 mg/1 iron, 0.50 mg/1 ming merge 70 nnttq of color At the exigtl.np, dug well ). The overall chemicnl. rnmpnglLlon Iq Indlrativr of n rock frncture wager nonrce. (See attacher) mop for 1`7.1 I011 And nr-MlInning teat repnrta). The potrntlAl yield of this source In quite good As A drawdown in the dill; well. of Ahonl: 10 ft. verticnlly occurred After 12 bourn of pumping, nt 1000 Pl,m f, At Lhl.g limn the well wnq eggenlinlly st:Ab(llzed, with rerhArge rqunlling the pnmping rnt.r. To determine n safe yield for this wafer sourer, n long term pnmpinp, program would hnve to lie developed lining A cluster of 5 or 6 tubular wells (or A 6" tegt well ) driven to the hottom of the water bearing rtrntn nod mnnifol(led together to permit n prolonged pump test for at I"Ast. gevell days. The egtlmnted cogt for the seven days Board of Water 6 Sewer Comm. July 6, 1976 pumV tegt would he at: ).east $70,000 including the cont of estlmnting the extent: of the trate 2 ronlrlbutlon to this nite. The exigtIng water hearing grnveIq ext"it d downward t.n a Fin l'It Ii-20' below I.Ion bot I:om of the Poo igtinl% t.est well and It, wool .1 be necessary to teal. pump this nquifer to do,term IOn the qaf , yield. If a prolonged pump test prodnced pond regnits and Town decided to re-develop tills water source then It world be necessary to build a treatment fariltty to SigniFdrnnt:ly reduce Iron ,hntrdnenq sold mnnganege levels. Ilepending on the lrveIn of operation and redorII on, the water trentment faci.l.tty court cost $1 ,000,000 or more. Ilaintenrnce and operation of a water treatment FnrtlIty would also have to be factored into any cost effective analysis. EPA mni hod 624 tests were performed ()n namplen retrieved f.ron all, f. i.ve (5) obecrval. lot) wells , nn two grpnrnte ncennloon, 3/13/87 and 5/11/87. The gecond Srnt of nnmploq wan taken to verify findings of enrlter sampling. in parttcnlar, observation well A5 had shown n whole rnnge of orgnni.cq that did not show nil In nay of the other test wells. The original (3/13/81) sample from O.W. 8i wnn gngperted of cnntnminnt: lnn, from pumping equipment and the second nel: of gamplon wns ordered. 1'he nernnd set of samples found nnl:hing in O.W. #'1 and only a trace (2. 1 pnrtn/billlon) of. 1 .2 Dichloret:hene In 0.14. Jit and ()floor nrgnnirs were nin-deterl:nbl.e. 0.14. 03 in very clone to the pond nt the dog well , nod probnbly reFlerts more the cnndlt:inn of the gnrfnce water rheminl:ry than that of the ground water. This pond sold its companion tipper pond receive storm water run-nff from Vtnntn Sqnnre and 'redl.gro St . , n bony , roogeated romtm rclnl area of Swampscott. There nre at len^.t three gasoline nervirn stntloon and numerous food-service eStahllgltmentg In the square. The 12 br. test pumping performed nt the existing dug well canned n 10'_t draw down in the dug well and about 0.03' draw down in the Pond Itself , whirh rovers 6-8 nrres. IF tills site Is to be re-nctivnted the gnallty of the gnrfnco water wil.l ltnve to he nccltrntety determined , monitored and protected, if suitnble. Significant changes in the water levels of the two ponds adjacent to this Rite would occur if the ncgniF.er was er.erciged rognlnrly nq s Supplemental water source for the Town of Flarbleltead. Apparent over pumping of the existing dug well and intrusion of galt water cnttged the ghuL-down of the original writer trentment Facility and pumping stntlnn lnrrtted here. These snme. constraints will have to be addregged if this wafer qunrce is to be re-activated. Board of Watpr 6 Sewer Comm. July 6, 1976 -3- B- 3-B. Thom son's Meadow Site Snmplen of Py.latIrip, surf Ace. wnter sources feeding the Thompnon 's tlendnw wnterghed nren tnkpn At this site, Aq follows : Sample/Site 111 The outlet of tire. drain pipe from Lynn Crushed Stone Co. 112 The outlet of the draln pipe under the rond to the drivl.ng range 03 6 4 At both Aiden of the culvert pipe under the Boston And Maine rallrond track. (See nttnrhrd report from Stpvpn9 Wnter Annlysls and portion of II-S.C.S. lnpngrnphlc mop) From annlysis of the four qurfnce water samples tnken on 3/11/87, it Appears that the anality of the nurfacr water rntes As fni.r to good, based upon A routine chemlcnl nnnlyais. We rhoge Al thnt time Ant to Anmple lir undertake the Analysis for vnlnttle organics (RPA Method 624 ). We did not: nnticipnte that the surf_ Ace wntpr coutnminnnt level for iron, mnngnnese, sodium, etc. would be As low ns they Are and felt Ihnt we rolrld save the money that the RPA 62.4 tests would require. However nfl.er review of the routine cirrmlrnl testa we concluded that thpsp tPgtn were nPcrsanry to give A complete pirtnre of the surface wnter chemigtry. Additional gnmples were tnken At snmple sites 111 ,2 and 3 and delivered to I,ycott Rnvir. Regenrch, Inc. for RPA 624 purgnbl.e testing. (See Attached map for snmP1P lorntinnq And Accompanying tent reports). Test rPgnitq IndlcAte A good gnnlity of gnrfnCe water feeding the Thompqon Hendow. llowPver ground water sampling, lint; not been done, due to the extreme difficulty to gaining, Access to suitable well AiteA. The abnndnnpd PamPlog station In completely in nibble -And underwnter slid the exiniting rondwny that nerved the pumping station has totally diAnppeared hnvinp, sunken Into the pent And organic suh-soil of the -mp.ndow/wetlAnd swamp. Their linvP been numprotis InstAncen of potential contamination of the Thompson'q tlendow nranifer from upstrenm Aonrcen. If this site in going to be considered for rP-act-lvntinn AT; A potable water nource the next process would be to Inst All test wells to sample ground water aunitty entering the meadow nrgnifer frnm the South, the West And the North. Board of Water b Sewer Comm. July 6, 1976 'file next step to hr taken, if the Board elects to cruntlnue further lovestigntlo,, of thin site would he to Install. test welly at potential well. site near the rallrond to sample ground wnter quailty nod test pump to doterninr safn yield, ss outlined In nur letter of 2/9/81 (copy enclosed). Before these tent wells ran be installed it will be necessary to construct nn nccess road arrross the mrnrinw from the high ground off Swampscott Rd. to the existing rniIroad and then pArnllet , n tntnl dl.stnnce of nearly 5,000 feet. Much of fills is within or hnrdrrinp, wet.Iandn and appropriate Conservation Comm IanJ.oil ltrrnAon won id Itnve to be obtnIned. Conclusions Development of either slte wl. l.l be an expensive one. There is poteuttal for a trrninble water supply at (Lepg's Iltll) Loring Ave. site. From preli.ml.nary pumping rrsltlts it appenrs that from 0. 75 - 1.0 mtllion gallons/dny could hr AvnIInhle there. Development of n water supply at Thompsno 'a Mnadnw might be even more costly; but: there Is sttll much to learn about this site. However, it 1s clear that it would not be. coat effective for the Town of Marblehead to develop either site without MDC/WRA or D.F.R.E. finnnclnl nssistnnre. It might be. apprnprinte at this time for the Town of Marblehnnd to determtne tile, extent of grant isslstnnce nvailable to them. Recommendnttonn I . Authorize the tnstnllntlon of 2-1 /2" teat wells around the perimeter of the wet-lands nt Thompson's Mendow to determine quality of ground water nt the ncquifer and the level of contnmtnntion that may Innve occurred. Estlmatrd cost $45,000 - 50,000. 2. Secure site nt I,nring Ave. from vandalism and acrldentnl. or IofontIounI enntaminatlon of Acquirer by erecting 6 ft. high chnin link fnnch with irrrgq pates nrolind perimeter. Clear bnfsh and smnl.l. trees to make the site more vinlble. from Loring, Ave. Estimated cost $30,000 - $35,DDD. 3. Complete n rest effective analysis nn both sites after completing, Thompsmt's tleadnw sampling (see Rerommendntion ill ) and subml.t a final report to D.F.tl.E. with recnmmendattoll for development of one site, two sites or neither site. Board of Water 6 Sewer comm. July 6, 1976 -5- Thls Pre llIII innry Rrpnrt Is presented to AummnrIze n I t of the data nbtninrrl thus far null to kerp the Ronrd Informed of the progrrna of our LnveRLll;ntloil r., ronrlasIoug Ind rrrommrn(in t.lonR. Yours very truly , HALEY AND WARM, INC. Bent - In II. BuRbee Vice President 11I1.8/R t . Rnct. CF,N5.1/169-1 73 CONTIGENCIES FOE pURCHASE OF MACKEY LAND LEGGS HILL MILESTONE TENATIVE DATE DESCRIPTION ' 1. 6/89 Research existing deeds, clear title, appraisal of property, collect existing 21 E studies, 4 A,V �. 2. 6/89 Elict comments and/or. compliants that might have been registered against Mackey property by the Salem Coaserv, Comm, 3. 6/89 Elict comments and/or complaint, that might have been registered against Mackey property by the Salem Board of Health. 4. 8/89 Evaluate potential use@ of Mackey land for - a. Standpipe or storage tank, . b. Aquifer or wall mead protection. , C' Negative impact of existing refuse, debris and fly ash. d, other potential uses. 5. 4/89 Evaluate potential impacts on neighborhood of re-activated water supply. a. positive aspect of improved supply and service. b. Negative aspect of I. potential lowering of ponds. 2. Cost of fencing, policeing and maintenance of well site. 3. Salem taxes to be paid by Marblehead on Mackey land. 6. 9/89 Resolution of Zone 2 study by MWRA and future use as water supply. 7. 9/89 Decision on. construction of storage reservoir at Legge Hill or Thompson's Meadow (with financial aid from MWRA - or DEQE). 8. 10/89 Complete new 21B study of entire Mackey land, if required, because existing data is inconclusive or inadequate. 9. 12/89 Decision on construction of standpipe or storage reservoir at Legge Hill by Marblehead alone. 10. 11. MAR 5/24 SS'oecial Conditions (continued) ALEM (Fafard Companies) Wetlands File #64-92 4 . At least 75% of the surface of the replacement areas shall be reestablished with indigenous wetlands plant species within two growing seasons , and prior to said vegetative reestablish- ment, any exposed soil in the replacement area shall be temporarily stabilized to prevent erosion. 5. The large pit near the intersection of First Street and Swampscott Road with a storage volume of 86 , 000 cubic feet, as referred to on pages 12 , 13 and 16 of the referenced "Supplemental Drainage Study" , shall be increased in size to accommodate theinflowfrom "Catchment S-1" associated with the one hundred vear design storm. 6 . So that the proposed construction will not exacerbate existing local flooding problems, the "discharge at the low point of Catchment S-4" , as described in the referenced drainaqe study and shown on the plan titled: "Highland Acres , Prelimi- nary Plan of Land in Salem, MA" and dated February 4 , 1982 and revised May 5 , 1983 by Pobert E. Maschi, P .E . and R.L. S . , shall not be increased beyond its present level , 110 cubic feet per second. 7 . Prior to any construction within one hundred feet of the wet- lands as shown on the above referenced plan, an erosion control barrier shall be installed between the construction site and any downgradient wetlands. 8 . The Fafard Companies, Inc. shall be responsible for ensuring that maintenance of all drainage inlets and outlets become a condition of all leasing or ownership of those properties for sale or lease within Highland Acres which will have drainage easements on them and will forward copies of all such mainten- ance agreements to the Salem Conservation Commission and the DEQE. 9 . The City of Salem and the Fafard Companies , Inc . shall enter into an agreement which guarantees maintenance of the proposed control structure, and forward such agreement to the Salem Conservation Commission and the DEQE. 10 . Construction and locus plans for any proposed above-ground or underground storage facilities for chemicals and/or fuel , to- gether with engineering construction plans , shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission and the DEQE prior to their construction. 11 . Any other changes proposed for the project as shown on the plans referenced above shall be submitted to DEQE and the Conservation Commission prior to implementation . At that time a determination will be made on whether said changes will re- quire additional conditions or the filing of a new Notice of Intent. THE FAFARO COMPANIES 290 Eliot Street/Ashland,MA 01721 50B Sell Fex#509-875-8610 H.A. Fafard 6 Sons Construction, Inc. Ledgemere Land Corporation Fafard Real Estate Interiors Town Line Associates. Inc. 6 November 8, 1988 P� r� Mr. Philip Moran, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green _ T Salem, MA 01970 " v Re: Highland Avenue, Salem -- DEQE #64-92 Superseding Order of Conditi'bps, Request for Relocation of Wetland Replication Sites t° Dear Mr. Moran: I am requesting relocation of the approved Compensatory Areas #4 and #7 to a new site (Area #8) immediately northwest of Building 22 (see enclosed plans) . Area #4 contains red maple trees, grapevines, and lawn along Whalers Lane which we would like to preserve. Area #7 comprises 10-15 feet of wooden ledge adjacent to Highland Park; red maple, red oak, paper birch, and white pine comprise the canopy layer. We would prefer to avoid making such a rock cut so close to the Park, given a better alternative. Both Compensatory Areas total 7,111+ sf. The 7,500+ sf alternative site is located some 300 feet southeast of Area #4 and within the same wetland system as Areas 4 and 7. Area #8 comprises the former location of a Phase II condominium building. The final Phase II plan was approved with this building removed, leaving the site as open space. It is now a flat area supporting little vegetation. I therefore request your endorsement of the relocation of Compensatory Areas #4 (1,892 sf) and #7 (5,219 sf) , totalling 7,111+ sf, to the alternative Area #8 (7,500+ sf) . The result would be preservation of the two original sites and the creation of an additional 389+ sf of wetland habitat in a less ecologically disruptive location. Siltfence would be erected along the existing wetland border as shown on this plan prior to any replication activity. Work would commence as soon as DEQE has approved the modification as shown on the enclosed Phase II Sheet 4 of 15, revision date 10/4/88. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Your truly, p Ronald S. Killian Planning and Land Use Coordinator RSK/mbt cc: DEQE Wetlands Division, Northeast Region Salem Planning Board Issued by the Department of EnvironmenjoLLyality Engineering. Signature ` On this 4 th day of Q t7ober 19 A4 before me personally appeared mhnma a F MrT,niiqh 1 in Art•i nq COmm _ tome known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same ayls/ his/her free a/\cctt and deed. N ary Public My commission expires The applicant.the owner,any person aggrieved by this Superseding Order•my owner of land abutting the land upon which the pro- posed work is to be done or any len persons pursuant to G.L.c.30A, §i 0A,are hereby notified of their right to request an adjudicalory hearing pursuant to G.L.30A, §10,providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department within len days from the date of issuance of the Superseding Order,and is addressed to: Docket Clerk.Office of General Counsel,Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.One Winter Street,Boston,MA 02106,A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the conservation commission,the applicant.and any other party. A Notice of Claim lot an Adjudicatory Hearing shall comply wiih the Department's Rules for Adjudicatory Proceedings,310 CMR 1.01(6).and shall contain the following Information: - (a) the DEOE Wetlands File Number,name of the applicant E id address of the project; (b) the complete name,address and telephone number of iMi party filing the request,and,if represented by counsel,the name and address of the attorney; (c) the names and addresses of all other parties,if known; (d) a clear and concise statement of(1)the facts which are grounds for the proceeding.(2)the objections to this Superseding Order, including specifically the manner in which it is ai aged to be inconsistent with the Department's Wetlands Regulations(310 CMR 10.00)and does not cont;bute to the protectic .of the interests identified In the Act,and(3)the relief sought through the adju- dicatory hearing,including specifically the char. es desired in the Superseding Order; (e) a statement that a copy of the request has been. ant to the applicant,the conservation commission and each other party or rep- resentalive of such party.it known. Failure to submit all necessary information may result ir.a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing. Detach on dotted line and submit to the prior to commencement of work. _......_............ To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition a on . 19- 11 recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is V registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is CSignature Applicant 5-4B I Forms U V i G C, DEOEReNo. 64-92 . � �- - �✓"�� - - (Tobe Provided by DEOE) Commonwealth cityrrown Salem of Massachusetts Applicant Fafard Companies Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. G.L. c. 131, §40 .�i SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION �. Fro To Mr. Gerard McNeil The Fafard Companies (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) 290 Eliot StreetAddress 290 Eliot Street Address Ashland, MA . Ashland, MA . This Order is Issued and delivered as follows: ❑ Eby hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date) TT by certified mail,return receipt requested on (date) This project islocated a Highland Avenue ; Swampscott Rd. ; Wilson Street; First Street 138-acres The property is recorded at the Registry of Essex 5292 734 (see addendum) Boolr page 6172 73 . Certificate(if registered) The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on March 25, 1983 (date) The public hearing was closed on January 12 , 1984 (date) Findings The SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project.Based on the information available to the CONSERVATION,-COMM. atthistime,the Conservation CommissiMdetermined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act(check as appropriate): X6 Public water supply xE3 Storm damage prevention ❑ Private water supply x{r] Prevention of pollution / 8 Groundwater supply ❑ Land containing shellfish >2 Flood control ❑ Fisheries 51 ` Therefore,the Salem Conservation Comm. hereby finds that the following conditions are necessary,in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations,to protect those inter- ests checked above.The Conservation Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the fol- l. lowing conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the conditions shall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein,and with all related statutes and other regulatory meas- ures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. This Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal,state or local statutes,ordinances, by-laws or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act;or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years,but less than five years,from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse,rubbish or de- bris,including but not limited to lumber,bricks,plaster,wire,lath, paper,cardboard,pipe,tires,ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed or,if such an appeal has been filed,until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property.In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done.In the case of registered land,the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done.The recording information shall be submitted to the Commission on the form at the end of this Order prior to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square f eet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, File Number 64-92 10. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all.agency proceedings and hearings before the Department- 11 . epartment- 11 . Upon completion of the wort:described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12.The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions: �. 5-2 Plans: Title Dated Signed and Stamped by: On File with: "Highland Acres" Preliminary- Plan--designating Phases A, B, C per order of ConCom Rcvd. by Con Com 11-10-83 Robert Maschi Conservation Commission Special Conditions(Use additional paper it necessary) a. .A site plan at a scale of 1" equals 40' for each phase (plan attached) and enlargements to a scale' acceptable to. the Conservation Commission where specific work under the jurisdiction of the. Wet- lands Protection Act takes place shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer or registered land .surveyor and shall show at least the followings lot lines within which the development is proposed and the tie-in to the nearest road intersection; the location, boundaries , and dimensions of each lot in question; two- foot contours of the existing and proposed land surface ; location of existing and proposed structures , water courses, drainage and drainage easements, means of access, utilities , and sewer disposal facilities. Proposed elevations should be noted. b. Site development plans when submitted to the Planning Board shall be submitted concurrently to the Commission to determine the adequacy of drainage and maintenance of the integrity of the controls stipulated under this Order. c. The members and agents of the Commission shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance with these conditions and to require the applicant to submit any data deemed necessary by the Commission for that evaluation. d. All approvals of any work performed in accorance with this Order shall be acted upon at regularly scheduled meetings of the. Commission. Request for inspections by the Commission or their agent shall be in writing. Advance notices shall state specifically the area A , ....................................................................................................................................................................-............... (Leave Space Blank) 5-3A i Issued By SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Conservation Commission SignaIure(s) . Tht�Cidermust be signedb majority of the Conservation Commission. -12- th day of January 19 84 before me On this, Qenonailyappeare' the above-named. to me known to be the , jI1eI SO'n dd8cCoed Ni and who executed the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed (he talnI his/h,er free act and deed. 9-9-88 Notary Public My commission expires The applicant,the owner,any person aggrieved by this Order,any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work Ls to ant be done or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land Is located are hereby notified of their right to request the Departm of Environmental Quality Engineering to issue a Superseding Order,providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department within ten days from the date of Issuance of this Order.A copy of the request shag et the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. �. Detach on dotted line and su bmit to the SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSIO1 rlor to commencement of work. .................. .- _............--.................. Issuing Authority To Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project a File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of tide of the affected property in accordance with General Condition a on If recorded land,the Instrument number which Identifies this transaction is If registered land,the document number which identities this transaction is Signature Applicant C_ 5-4A Order of Condit ions--DEQE # 54-92 Page 5--3B B, or C which is subject to inspection and the statement shall in- clude a general description of the work considered done . e. Each phase shall be reviewed and acted upon by the Conservation Commission independently and as it impacts the total development. f. Written inspection reports relative to items regulated under .the Order of Conditions shall be prepared by the "Clerk of the Works" designated by the Planning Board and shall be provided to the Com- mission on a bi-monthly basis. g. Siltation and Erosion Control plans shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission for its approval 30 days prior to the com- mencement of each phase . Said plan shall stipulate a phased con- struction schedule required by the Conservation Commission and shall be strictly adhered to. The Siltation and Erosion Control plans shall address all stockpiled material, any disturbed land, and finished landscaped areas deemed significant to wetland pro- tection. h. No filling and/or grading of an area is allowed until the sil- tation control facilities are installed, inspected and approved by the Clerk of the Works. i. Updated drainage calculations shall be submitted to the Conser- vation Commission with application for specific phases. j . Any conservation work required within a specific phase by this Order of Conditions shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Conservation Commission prior to the commencement of work in a sub- sequent phase unless prior consent from the Commission is obtained. This consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. k. Any changes made or intended to be made in the plans shall re- quire the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change requires an amendment to the original filing. 1. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for any phase of the project, the developer shall submit evidence of the dedica- tion of drainage easements of overall drainage facilities with the phase , including, but not necessarily limited to retention areas , detention areas, control structures , pipes , drainage swales , and appurtenant facilities. m. As-built drawings, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or Registered Land Surveyor shall be be submitted for each phase within thirty (30) days of the completion of the phase , prior to issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for that phase . n. A list of any proposed above-graound or underground storage facilities for chemicals and/or fuel, together with engineering construction plans , shall be submitted to the Conservation Commis- sion prior to any construction of same . • Order of Conditions--DEQE # 64-92 Page 5--3C 0, With the exception of temporary basins to control run-off and sedimentation related to construction, no new retention ponding areas will be constructed in areas which might contribute any contaminants to the shall aquafer which recharges Thompsons Mea- dow. These areas are identified as catchments T-2 , T-3 , T-4, S-5, s-7 , and S-8 in the Final Environmental Impact Report drain- age study. No application of road salt shall be permitted on private 'driveways , roadways, or parking areas s within the development. q. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in in- terest or successor in control. I ADDENDUM: QUESTION 1 Ail- BOOK BOOK PAGE DESCRIPTION ACRES 5292 734 Lot 6 14.89 5292 734 Lot 2 6.44 5292 734 unnumbered lot 5.29 6172 734 3.13 734 lot 3 _. 4 46 5292 734 lot 4 7.22 6017 793 lot A 8.2 43944 197 lot 567F 1 .03 5292 734 lot 1 21 .33 . 5292 734 lot 6B 28.31 43581 196 lot 653 4.50 5292 734 lot 5 10.18 y r>r Y N A"�l F. ► 9 �►u urnu uuI►►► rsr ► 9 i 7 4 07) 3,4 ;Z AREA b s AREI ANE I 1416H Wb -PARI< COMPENSATORY Y: . AREA b AREA5. ;: . rate} ' } /D 88 NOTES. Li (c o L LOCATION SUBJECT T( CITY ELEC AREA � J � 2 ALL UNITS u w FROM NA E 8� FIR v e 5 e G - _P SE LINE 9 z -�' u CURRENT M ANDlz CAN E A. -" BOARD APPI COVERED IN 3/ 5. REVISIOdS i 9/21/8TBAC ,y LAN ,s ' 8o • i Form 2. DEOE Fie No. - - - (To be provided by DEQE) Ciryrtown Salem - (^ Commonwealth 'L of Massachusetts t ApplicantFafard Determination of Applicability_ Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L c. 131, §40 Fro Salem Conservation Commission Issuing Authority To Fafard'. Companies same (Name of person making request) . (Name of property owner) Address 290 Elliot St' '"Ashlan8; MA Address This determination is issued and delivered as follows:. II by hand delivery to person making request on (date) II by certified mail,return receipt requested on (date) Pursuant to the authority of G.L a 131, §40,the. Conservation rn,n,,,issiam has considered your request for a Determination of Applicability and its supporting documentation,and has made the following determination(check whichever is applicable): This Determination is positive: 1, [ The area described below,which includes all/part of the area described in your request,is an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act Therefore,any removing,filling, dredging or altering of that area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. The Cormnission-has determined that: Wetlands #1&2 of the "Resource Mapping in - ,.-- - Salem, MA ;:dated 8/27/87, are isolated land subject to flooding, 2 II_ The worts described below,which includes all/part of the work described in your request,is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act and will remove,fill,dredge or alter that area There fore,said work requires the firing of a Notice of Intent. 2-1 S1 3. ❑ The work described below,which includes all/part of the work described in your request; is within the Buffer Zone as defined in the regulations, and will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. This Determination is negative: 1. ❑ The area described in your request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. 2. ❑ The work described in your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act, but will not remove, fill, dredge, or alter that area.Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. - 3. ❑ The work described in your request is within the Buffer Zone,as defined in the regulations, but win not alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore,said work does not require the flung of a Notice of Intent. 4. ❑ The area described in your request is Subject to Protection Under the Act,but since the work described therein meets the requirements for the following exemption,as specified in the Act and the regulations, no Notice of Intent is required: Issued by Ccnservabon Commission I Signature's) -This Determination must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. • On this 225 day of 'Ir4v»�" 19 7 before me . personally appeared 71 ova- ✓ � vv. _K to me known to be the person described in, and who executed, the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he/she executed the/ e as his/her freect and deed. ^� mmi / ^ _VY.Loseion Expires August 12, MA ^ v c -- = Notary Public My commission expires This Oetennination does not relieve the applicant from complying with all other applicable federal,state or local statutes,ordinances. by-taws or regulations.This Determination rrall be valid for three years form the bate of issuance. - The applicant, the owner,any person aq;,eyed by mis Determination,any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is t0 be done,or any ten residents of the city or tgwn in which Such land is located.are hereby notified of their right to request the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering to issue a Superseding Determination of Applicability,providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Departrnent within ten days from the date of issuance of this Determination.A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail cr hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. 2-2A so Form 2.. -- - .. - - DEQE Re No. --� (To be provided by DDEEEQE) Commonwealth - Cityrrown Salem - (^ of Massachusetts � Appi +t Fafard Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 Fro Salem Conserdat>on Commission Issuing Authority To Fafard Companies same (Name of person making request) - (Name of property owner) Address`'290 Elliot St"' Ashland, MA Address This determination is Issued and delivered as follows: 0 by hand def vIery to person making request on (date) 0 by certified mad,return receipt requested on (date) Pursuant to the authortyofG_Lc- 131, §40,the Conservation Commission has considered your request for a Determination of Applicability and its supporting documentation,and has made the following determination(check whichever is applicable): This Determination is positive: 1• [ The area described below,which includes all/part of the area described in your request,is an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act Therefore,any removing,filling,dredging or altering of that area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent The Commission has determined. that Wetlands 111&2 of the •"Resource Mapping in Salem;, MA 'dated 8/27/87, are isolated land subject to, flooding, 2 p The work described below,which includes aii/part of the work described in your request,is within anArea Subject to Protection Under the Act and will remove,fig,dredge or alter that area.There fore,said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. 2-1 si 3, ❑ The work described below,which includes all/part of the work described in your request; is within the Buffer Zone as defined in the regulations, and will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. This Determination is negative: 1. ❑ The area described in your request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act ' 2. ❑ The work described in your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act, but will not remove, fill, dredge,or alter that area.Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 3. ❑ The work described in your request is within the Buffer Zone, as defined in the regulations, but win not alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore,said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent 4. ❑ The area described in your request is Subject to Protection Under the Act, but since the work described therein meets the requirements for the following exemption,as specified in the Act and the regulations, no Notice of Intent is required: Issued by Conservation Commission Signatures) -v This Determination must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. • On this —day of nuc vn 19 S'7 before me . personally appear tome known to be V ra person described in, and who executed, the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she executed the/$sine as his/her freQ ct and deed. L� ,�^ -FY Zomtniision frpaes August 72, i994 Notary Pu/blit v My commission expires This Determination does not relieve the applicant from complying with all other applicable federal.state or local statutes.ordinances. by-laws or regulations.This Determination shall be valid for three years form the date of issuance. The applicant,the owner,any person aggrieved by th;s Determination,any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done,or any ten residents of toe city or;own in which such land is located,are hereby notified of their right to request the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering io,ssue a superseding Determination of Applicability,providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department w,Mm ten days from the date of issuance of this Determination.A copy of Me request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. 2.2A RECEIVED Form 7 APR p 7 1994 DEOE File No. 64-92 Salem Pianning t)ept. (To be provided by DEOE) Commonwealth City/Town Salem > of Massachusetts Fafard Co. Applicant Extension Permit Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L. c. 131 , §40 : Department of Environmental Protection i'ram: (Issuing Authority To' Fafard Companies 290 Eliot St. Ashland, MA 01721 (Name) (Address) The Order of Conditions(or Extension Permit)issued on October 4, 1984 (date) to Fafard Co. (name)forworkat Highland Ave. (address)is hereby extended for a period of Three (3) year(s)from the date it expires. This Extension Permit will expire on October 4, 1996 (date) This document shall be recorded in accordance with General Condition 8 of the Order of Conditions. ..................................................................................................................._..._.........................................._........_...... (Leave Space Blank) - 7.1 Stlbin M. Lord Jr. Regional Engineer for Resource Protection Issued by / Signature(s) i G� When issued by the Conservation Commission this Extension Permit must be signed by a majority of its members. On this 30th day of March 19 94 before me personally appeared Sabin M. Lord Jr. RERP to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public My commission expires Detach on dotted line and submit to the prior to commencement of work- _' ..____...__._._._.._..... To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Extension Permit to the Order of Conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 of the original order of conditions on t? If recorded land•the instrument number which identifies this transaction is If registered land,the document number which identifies this transaction is Signature Applicant 7-2 j 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY I:NGINP.URING `,. 10.99: Forms Form 1 I i S sfrom i oeoe no W. - o�m� (To be Wb by 0EOE1 Salem Commonwealth dlty/rmm Howa�Tr aF ward . Of Massachusetts Acwk.ra 3 2 Request for a Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,G.L C.131, §40 '1 1. I,the undersigned,hereby request that the Salem I Conservation Commission make a determination as to whether the area,described below,or work to be ? performed an said area,also described below,is subject to the junsdicilon of the Wetlands Protection Act,(LL c.131,§40. ti 2. The arae U described as follows.(Use maps or plans,it necessary,to provide a description and the location of the area subject to this request.) i We wish to confirm that two,wetland areas shown on the attached plan, labelled "Resource Mapping in Salem, Mass. , dated August 27, 1987, are "isolated (7;: land subject to flooding". 'w Wetland--l .is obviously isolated. Wetland 2 appears to be isolated. i 3. The work in said area is described below.(Use additional paper,if necessary,to desonbe the �7 proposed work.) - 'i If we later propose to alter the "isolated land subject '7 to flooding", the only issues to address are flooding and storm damage prevention. If these areas are altered, detention basins will be provided for flood control purposes. a i i A 6/30/83 Vol. 12 - 222.1 i 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING 10.99: continued 'i Form 1: continued I 4. The owner(s)of the area,if not the person making this request,has been given written notification of this requeston (date) The ru me(s)and address(es)of the owner(s): Howard A. Fafard 290 Eliot Street Ashland, MA 01721 5. 1 have fled a complete copy of this request with the appropriate region oflige�LtQe Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on August L/, 1921/ (date) X Northeast Southeast 5 Commonweal ttakevileHospital EIII Woburn,MA 01801 Avenue Lakeville,MA 02346 Central Western 75 Grove Street Public Health Center Worcester,MA 61605 University of Massachusetts Amherst,MA 01003 6. 1 understand that notification of this request will be placed in a local newspaper at my expense in accor- dance with Section 10.05(3)(b)1 of the regulations by the Conservation Commission and that I will be billed accordingly. Howard A. Fafard S n Name Addfarls 290 Eliot Street Tel 881-1600 Ashland, MA 01721 1.2 6/30/83 \ Vol. 12 - 222.2 (C. Z i �z Conservati®n Comnussim F� �w Salem. Massachusots 01970 .}�.ten ssnCNv January 4, 1989 William Krol DEQE Wetlands Division, Northeast Region 5 Commonwealth Place Woburn, MA 01801 RE: Highland Ave. , Salem — DEQE #64-92 Superseding Order of Conditions Relocation of Wetland Replication Sites Dear Mr. Krol: At a meeting on December 22, 1988, members of the Salem Conservation Commission voted to endorse a request by the Fafard .Companies for relocation of approved Compensatory Areas #4 and #7 to an alternative site, Area #8. The Commission approves of the proposed change since it eliminates the need to blast ledge, preserves the two original sites and creates an additional 389 s. f. of wetlands replication area. Thank you for consideration of our views. Sincerely, Kathleen M. Winn Conservation Administrator cc: Ronald S. Killian The Fafard Companies J2714 i `1,10y ;p,,f Lip C , Y V a�.�`aYBY Com e V'AJL 'L r � Sahni, hlassachuscfts 01970 F��.ifASS 1Ct��, i l S ' 1 June 15, 1987 Mr. John Felix Department of Environmental Quality Engineering 5 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, MA 01810 Dear Mr. Felix: At last night ' s meeting of the Conservation Commission, (June 11 , 1987) , it was voted to endorse the Fafard Phase II Condominium Project, as amended per plans entitled "Fafard Phase II — Planned Unit Development" dated October 1986, revision date May 13, 1987. Please consider this letter as approval of the above referenced plan. Sincerely, Philip D. Moran Chairman - cc: Ron Killian 41 uv Cot -;r uonS07vation ComMISSIO n. e Salem. Blassachusctfs 01970 April 27 , 1987 Mr . John Felix Department of Environmental Quality Engineering 5 Commonwealth Avenue - Woburn , MA 01810 Dear Mr . Felix , At last nights meeting of the Conservation Commisslon , (April 23 , 1987 ) it was voted to endorse the Fafard Phase II Condominium Project , as amended per plans entitled "Fafard Phase II— Planned Unit De'velopement" dated October 1986 , revision date N-o ' � oAYI--, Please consider this letter as approval of the above referenced plan . Sincerely , in c e/{,/rr e l /y ,,, 2 Philip D . Moran Chairman ORDER OF CONDITIONS FILE #: 64-122 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: GENERAL 1 . All work shall be in accordance with the Notice of Intent, including supporting documentation and the above referenced plans. 2. The Conservation Commission has determined that the bordering vegetated wetland to be significant to the Act. 3. Any changes made or intended to be made in the plans shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing, by Regestired Receipt Mail, whether the changes require Salem Conservation Commission comments or approval. 4. As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professionalengineer, shall be submitted to the Commission prior to issuance of a certificate of Compliance. 5. The above conditions designated by a shall remian in effect beyond a certificate of Compliance issued for this phase of construction. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND MITIGATION 1 . Prior to any cosntruction within one hundred feet of the wetlands as shown on the above referenced plans, an erosion control and sedimentation barrier shall be installed between the construction site and any down gradient bordering vegetated wetlands. The erosion controls and sedimentation barriers shall be established in accordance with "Erosion and Sedimentation Control Guidelines", Publication #13, 529-39-1000-2-84-C.R. , dated August, 1983 , and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission or its designated agent. 2. A detail of the propsed path shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. 3. Recosntruction of proposed rock wall shall be at a minimum of 12:1 and shall be constructed of indigenous rock no larger than 2 ' in diameter. 4. If, during the course of construction, the Applicant discovers inappropriate fill within the wettland or burfer zone, it shall be promptly removed from the site. If said fill might be cosntructed as hazardous, the following steps shall be taken. The Applicant shall. immediately request a determination from the DEQ$E as to whether the material constitutes a hazardous waste. Page 2 — If DEQE determines the material to be non—hazardous, the Applicant will remove the material from the site or dispose of the matter on site in a manner approved by the Conservation Commission. Fill material which DEQE determines to be hazardous shall be removed from the site with in four weeks from the date of the positive finding. The hazardous material shall be removed from the date of the positive finding. The hazardous materila shall be removed to an approved facility and copies of delivery slips shall be supplied to the Conservation Commission. Until such material is removed, the material shall be covered and surrounded by hay bales. The Applicant shall provide the Conservation Commission with copies of all correspondence to and from DEQE within seven calendar days. MAINTENANCE 1 . The Applicant, and its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for maintenance of all drianage, inlets and outlets and for ensuring that said maintenance becomes a condition of all leasing or ownership of the property. Copies of sll such maintenance agreements shall be forwarded to the Conservation Commission and the DEQE. 2. Gas traps shall be installed in all catch basins. Cleaning and maintenance of such catch basins shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. ORDER OF CONDITIONS FILE #: 64-122 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: GENERAL 1 . All work shall be in accordance with the Notice of Intent, including supporting documentation and the above referenced plans. 2. The Conservation Commission has determined that the bordering vegetated wetland to be significant to the Act. 3. Any changes made or intended to be made in the plans shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing, by Regestired Receipt Mail, whether the changes require Salem Conservation Commission comments or approval. • 4. As—built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional engineer, shall be submitted to the Commission prior to issuance of a certificate of Compliance. 5. The above conditions designated by a * shall remian in effect.- beyond a certificate of Compliance issued for this phase of construction. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND MITIGATION 1. Prior to any cosntruction within one hundred feet of the wetlands as shown on the above referenced plans, an erosion control and sedimentation barrier shall be installed between the construction site and any down gradient bordering vegetated wetlands. The erosion controls and sedimentation barriers shall be established in accordance with "Erosion and Sedimentation Control Guidelines", Publication #13, 529-39-1000-2-84—C.R. , dated August, 1983, and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission or its designated agent. 2. A detail of the propsed path shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. 3. Recosntruction of proposed rock wall shall be at a minimum of lZ:l and shall be constructed of indigenous rock no larger than 2' in diameter. 4. If, during the course of construction, the Applicant discovers inappropriate fill within the wettland or burfer zone, it shall be promptly removed from the site. If said fill might be cosntructed as hazardous, the following steps shall be taken. The Applicant shall immediately request a determination from the DEQ$E as to whether the material constitutes a hazardous waste. I Page 2 — If DEQE determines the material to be non—hazardous, the Applicant will remove the material from the site or dispose of the matter on site in a manner approved by the Conservation Commission. Fill material which DEQE determines to be hazardous shall be removed from the site with in four weeks from the date of the positive finding. The hazardous material shall be removed from the date of the positive finding. The hazardous materila shall be removed to an approved facility and copies of delivery slips shall be supplied to the Conservation Commission. Until such material is removed, the material shall be covered and surrounded by hay bales. The Applicant shall provide the Conservation Commission with copies of all correspondence to and from DEQE within seven calendar days. MAINTENANCE 1 . The Applicant, and its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for maintenance of all drianage, inlets and outlets and for ensuring that said maintenance becomes a condition of all leasing or ownership of the property. Copies of sll such maintenance agreements shall be forwarded to the Conservation Commission and the DEQE. 2. Gas traps shall be installed in all catch basins. Cleaning and maintenance of such catch basins shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. SEPTEMBER 23 , 1985 DRAFT ORDER OF CONDITIONS Kart - 204 highland Avenue PLANS: HSA ¢#2466 Grading & Utility Plan 7/9/85 A.F. Sharry III Engineering Calculations Various dates: Hancock Survey '(Attached to Notice of 2/14/85 Associates Intent) 2/15/85 7/12/85 8/8/83 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: GENERAL t1 -- 1 . All wor shall be in accordance with the Notic f Intent, including supporting documentation and the above referenced plans. ---�27 The Conservation Commission has determined that the bordering vegetated wetland to be significant to the Act. V3 . Any changes made or intended to be made in the plans shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the changes require Salem Conservation Commission comments or approval . "'-'47 As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Commission prior to issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. 5. The above conditions designated by a * shall remain in effect beyond a Certificate of Compliance issued for this phase of construction. ALTERATIONS TO THE WETLAND ----f. Any damaged or impaired bordering vegetated wetland shall be compensated for on a one for one, square foot for square foot basis in the following manner: tea) The replacement areas shall function in a manner similar to the area that will be lost. ,.b) The replacement area shall have surface and ground water elevations approximately equal to the wetland areas to be filled. ----'c) The overall horizontal configuration and location of the replacement area with respect to the bank will be similar to that of the lost area. Page. 2 - —d"r The replacement area shall have an unrestricted hydraulic connection to the same water body associated with the lost area. _e)-'-The replacement areas shall be located within the same general area of the waterway as the lost area. f)- Wetrand area to be filled: 640-50-s. f. Wetland area to be created: 970-5 E)-s-. f. S S .. 2 . Notwithstanding the approval of plans, calculations and supporting documents referenced as part of this Order of Conditions, the respective discharge flows from the stream shall not be increased beyond its present level . �3— All replacement areas to be constructed shall be lined on their* surface with topsoil excavated from the wetlands to be filled as a result of the project. Arrangements shall be made for storage and protection of the topsoil after removal and before replacement. __-4: At least 75% of the surface of the replacement areas shall be re-established with indigenous wetlands plant species within two growing seasons. Prior to vegetative re-establishment, any exposed soil in the replacement area shall be temporarily stabilized in accordance with "Erosion and Sedimentation Control Guidelines", Publication #13, 529-39-1000-2-84-C.R. , dated August , 1983 . 5. A report shall be presented to the Conservation Commission and the DEQE at the end of two growing seasons subsequent to the implementation of this project indicating the amount of wetlands that has actually been replicated/created by the construction of the replacement areas and any associated construction or plantings. Any compensatory wetland area which does not revegetate with characteristic bordering vegetated wetland species over 75% of its surface3 area within two growing seasons shall be re-planted with characteristic species. A planting plan for such purposes shall be presented to and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission prior to its implementation. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND MITIGATION _r Prior to any construction within one hundred feet of the wetlands as shown on the above referenced plans, an erosion control and sedimentation barrier shall be installed between the construction site and any down gradient bordering vegetated wetlands. The erosion controls and sedimentation barriers shall be established in accordance with "Erosion and Sedimentation Control Guidelines" , Publication #13, 529-39-1000-2-84-C.R. , dated August, 1983, and approved by the Salem Conservation commission or its designated agent. 1 — Page- 3 — i2— Banks bordering vegetated wetlands shall be disturbed as little as possible. Those bank areas requiring alteration will be regraded at a maximum slope of lg:l , loamed and re—established with indigenous vegetation. At the top of said slope, a 6 ' level pervious landscaped zone shall be maintained. In locations where the applicant are unable to maintain the banks as defined above, detailed plans for those specific conditions will be submitted for Conservation Commission approval prior to construction. , +-- T. If, during the course of construction, the Applicant discovers inappropriate fill within the wetland or buffer zone, it shall be promptly removed from the site. If said fill might be construed as hazardous, the following steps shall be taken. The Applicant shall immediately request a determination from the DEQE as to whether the material constitutes a hazardous waste. If DEQE determines the material to be non—hazardous, the Applicant will remove the material from the site or dispose of the matter on site in a manner approved by the Conservation Commission. Fill material which DEQE determines to be hazardous shall be removed from the site within four weeks from the date of the positive finding. The hazardous material shall be removed to an approved facility and copies of delivery slips shall be supplied to the Conservation Commission. Until such material is removed, the material shall be covered and surrounded by hay bales. The Applicant shall provide the Conservation Commission with copies of all correspondence to and from DEQE within seven calendar days. 4. Force main crossing wetland — for discussion MAINTENANCE -c 1 . The Applicant, and its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for maintenance of all drainage inlets and outlets and for ensuring that said maintenance becomes a condition of all leasing or ownership of the property. Copies of all such maintenance agreements shall be forwarded to the Conservation Commission and the DEQE. C 2. The Applicant, and its successors and assigns shall be responsible for ensuring that salt as a deicing agent shall not be used on the roadways. I THE FAFARD COMPANIES RECEIVED 290 Eliot Street/Ashland.MA 01721 61 -881-1800 JUL 2 71987 Fax x6177-881-6231 SALEM PLANNING DEPT. H.A.Fafard 6 Sons Construction,Inc. Ledgemere Land Corporation Fafard Real Estate Interiors Town Line Associates.Inc. July 23, 1987 Mr. Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Northeast Region 5 Commonwealth Place Woburn, MA 01801 Re: DEQE #64-92, Request for Order of Conditions Extension Dear Mr. Lord: I respectfully request a three-year extension of The Fafard Companies' Highland Avenue, Salem Superseding Order of Conditions, DEQE #64-92, issued by DEQE on October 4, 1984, and recorded in the Essex County (Southern District) Registry of Deeds at Book 7548 Page 383 on October 15, 1984. We have received City approval for and have construction underway for two phases of the four-phase, 520 unit condominium development along Whalers Lane and have one building (Heartland) on the commercial portion of the P.U.D. covered under this Order of Conditions. It is clear that the remaining development potential of this sizeable project will not be met within a one-year extension. Therefore, I am requesting the three-year extension under General Condition #5. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Yours truly, Ronald S. Killian Planning and Land Use Coordinator RSK/jar cc: Salem Conservation Commission John Serafini, Sr. , Esq. SITE PLAN FOR LAND ' S END [PHASE 3A] OF LEDGEMERE COUNTRY IN SALEM , MASS . SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTATION JANUARY 27 , 1995 SITE NARRATIVE The purpose of this narrative is to briefly outline the parameters which are incorporated into the accompanying engineered site plans referred to as Land ' s End [ Phase 3A of Ledgemere Country ] . An Envi-ronmental Impact Report was filed [addressing full build- out of the entire site ] with the State prior to Phase I which addressed those environmental issues which are covered within Salem- s Environmental Impact. Stud\ requirements . for this reason the EIS is not included within this submittal . There are a couple of items which should be addressed regarding the existing infrastructure . Apparently some of the shade trees adjacent to whaler ' s Lane have not been planted or have died . In the spring the applicant shall complete or replace 1,llese plantings . Also any trails that were designated for clearing shall be established in the spring . It has lalso been brought to our attention t.hat some of the street lights seem to be malfunctioning , the utility company responsible has been notified and the applicant shall follow up on this issue . During construction of subsequent phases it is recognized that disturbance of the existing residents be minimized . Construction vehicles shall be banned from accessing Whaler ' s Lane from the Trader ' s Way end and a sign will be posted indicating this . There is an existing cart path that goes from Swampscott Road up a steep incline directly to Whaler ' s Lane . Construction vehicles will use this access road whenever possible but large vehicles or bad weather will preclude use of this on an exclusive basis . Gates will be installed to deter use during off hours by others . This proposal includes the construction of five 4 plexes which will be of the same architectural style as found in phases one and two of the project . Clapboard siding will be utilized along with brick chimneys . Structurally , the buildings shall be framed with lumbgr rather than poured concrete as was the case previously . There will also be a more elaborate entryway which shall serve to differentiate these new units from the older ones . It is the developer ' s intent to market a slightly more attractive condominium so that the existing units will not be undercut in their resale values . Enclosed within this documentation are floor plans and elevations which illustrate these improvements . Another improvement that has been implemented is the increased parking capacity . The units of phase 3A shall have 3 . 5 parking spaces for the short ells and 4 . 5 spaces for each long ell. . The number of spaces has been increased by utilizing wing walls adjacent to the garage . Lighting has been designated so as to illuminate the area surrounding the units and landscaping has been designated so as to buffer the units from each other as well as vehicular traffic . areas that are not disturbed during construction shall remain in their natural state . This is especially true for the adjacent wetland which shall not be impacted by construction and shall have a silt-fence to help protect it . Disturbed areas shall be loamed and seeded . Traffic flow shall access Whaler ' s Lane via three new common driveways as well as the existing Tybee Lane . A traffic study was performed prior to issuance of the Planned Unit Development Special Permit . This study was performed in anticipation of 520 units thatt the applicant is allowed to build . 4t final build-out of the entire project [ through Phase 4 ] the project will not exceed the 520 units which were approved . Special care has been taken to provide greater snow storage areas by limiting the planting ' s proximity to paved travel ways . An auxiliary snow storage area has been shown adjacent to Whaler ' s Lane . Other appurtenant utilities are indicated on the engineering plans submitted with this documentation . . . a CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION SITE PLAN REVIEW SPECIAL PERMIT Applicant: Fgrfi�D L= S Date of Submittal : //z7/5'S Address: ��r S ._. .I2q 0 / 7zr Proposed Date of Eearirc: Telephone: �S G0 S� I _ /E- , Date of Approval : Location of Property: Date of Completion of AnLeal Lc`'�>C• Period: wi-I�FQEni L.n/ I. Project Descri tion: a. Zoning district: ei4- 3 b. Square footage of parcel: z .v� re�ce3 c. Square footage of structure(s) : ✓.� 6—S d. Square footage of footprint: ,,-z,6� e. No. of, dwelling units (if applicable) : z� ( S- 4v�n---T II. Additional Information: Information required includes this application arc the following additional information. File one copy of all inforstation with City Clerk and five copies with the Planning Board (all copies must be stamped by City Clerk) . a. A Site Plan at a scale of 1"=401 , (or as established by Planning Board) including all requirements as set forth in Section IIIB of the Salem Subdivision Regulations and the following: 1 . Location and dimensions of. all buildings and other construction; 2 . Location and dimensions of all parking areas, loading areas, walkways, and driveways; 3. Location and dimensions of all internal roadways and aceessways to adjacent public roadways; 4 Location and type of external lighting; 5. Location, type, dimensions and qualities of landscaping and screening; 6. Location and dimensions of utilities, gas, telephone, electrical communications, water , drainage, sewer and other waste disposal; 7 . Location of snow removal areas; 8. Location of all existing natural features including ponds, brooks, streams, wetlands, and marshes; 9 . Existing and proposed topography of the site, wit^ two foot contours; 10. Conceptual drawings and elevations of buildings to be erected including elevations showing architectural styles. b. A brief narrative, as requested by the Planning Board addressing these site plan requirements and other appropriate concerns in the following defined categories: I . Building 2. Parking and loading 3. Traffic flow, circulation and traffic impact 4. External lighting S . Landscaping and screening 6. Utilities 7. Snow removal 8. Natural features and their protection and enhancement 9. Topography and its maintenance 10. Compatibility of architecture with surrounding area C. An Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Appendix A of the Salem Subdivision Regulations . III. Procedure: The Planning Board shall, within 7 days after the filing of this application, transmit one copy of said application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City . Engineer, Board of Health and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health and Conservation Commission or until thirty-five ( 35) days have elapsed after distribution of such application without a submission of a report . The Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit. The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit. The Planning Board may, as a condition of approval, require that the applicant give effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds, of the conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor in title to alleviate the effects of same. f) Signature of Applicant Dater S� Fee Paid: EX\DH\SPRSPAPP 684 1 WARD REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT CORP. I�. 290 ELIOT ST. ASHLAND, MA 01721 A, 5-13/" p � 1 1 PAY - \ 1° C 91 `j ORDER OF- 5oc LI— c o-a _ —DOL !;S is Fleet Bank � ` �� FOR�Au t 111000684il' 1:OL100013al: 93635 920 6°5 WARD REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT' CORP. 1 290 ELIOT ST. ASHLAND, MA 01721 19 .i PAY TH E I" ORDER OF r l r �rd il L/U DOLLARS Flee i 11900068511' 1:0110001381: 93635 9 201811' N � N y b C�] N H [s] H u ^ gOQf, 11:174HS- 1 ^' C� 04"ON M1 11177y� r,/Ci�Gll�.� �L�{A.Z�7si GK- .14YQ44L• R Planning Foam A4�01111N6 ZY one ! ttWem Green FEa 13 3 37 °N '86 February 7, 1986 FILE; CITY Certification of Action cn Ms. Josephine Fusco City Clerk, City of Salem �- c Salem, MA 01970 r Re: Planned Unit Development Special Permit The Fafard Companies - 69 0 acres located roughly between First Street, Whalers Lane, andziz Swampscott Road. o0 O Dear Ms. Fusco: cn I hereby certify that, pursuant to Section VII-0 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Board of the City of Salem took the following action on the above-referenced application: By unanimous vote, the Board voted to approve the application for a Special Permit under the provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, with Cn attending conditions. o 0 Notice of the Board's action and the reasons supporting it are p fully described in the attached decision, a copy of which was sent today to the Applicant by registered mail at the address stated on the application. Walter B. Power III Chairman, Salem Planning Board BN/Fusco eoe.+. 8'7V542 . CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD IN RE: APPLICATION OF THE FAFARD COMPANIES FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT UNDER SECTION VII-O OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SALEM DECISION This decision is rendered upon an application for a special permit for a planned unit development pursuant to Section VII-O of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem (the "Ordinance"). The application was submitted on April 23, 1985, by The Fafard Companies, which include Howard A. Fafard, Ledgemere Condominium Corporation, and Ledgemere Land Corporation,(collectively, "Fafard") together with a site plan entitled "Ledgemere Country lI-Planned Unit Development", by William McDonough, P.E., February 1, 1985, Revised 6-24-85, 7- 18-85, 10-1-85, December, 1985 and an Environmental Impact Statement as required by Section VII-O 4 of Ordinance. The Board, within seven days after receipt of the application transmitted a copy of the application and the plan to the Inspector of Buildings, the City Engineer, the Board of Health and the Conservation Commission. Notice of the filing of the application was also given to the City Clerk, Fire Department, Police Department, Superintendent of Streets and the School Department. Notice of Public Hearing by the Board on this application was duly published in the Salem News on May 1, 1985 and May 8, 1985 and duly mailed to all persons entitled thereto by law. A public hearing on the application was held in accordance with such notice at 7:30 p.m. on May 16, 1985, in the second floor hearing room at One Salem Green in Salem. The following members of the Board were present at the hearing: QZ71-H543 Walter Power III, Abby Burns, Robert Guethlen, Edward Stevenson, John Ahern, Kenneth May and Normand Houle. Reports on the Application were received from the following Boards and Officers on the dates set forth below: 1. Inspector of Buildings - Commented orally with no written report 2. City Engineer - Commented orally with no written report 3. Board of Health - May 15, 1985 4. Conservation Commission - Order of Conditions, DEQE file 64-92 - January 12, 1984 The Board has made a thorough study of and has given full consideration to, all documents, plans and other materials submitted by Fafard; the reports, written or otherwise, of the Inspector Buildings; the City Engineer; the Board of Health and the Conservation Commission and all statements made and other materials submitted at the Public Hearing and at other public meetings of the Board at which the Application was discussed. The Board is satisfied that such data is sufficient to meet the requirements of Section VII-O of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the Board has unanimously voted to grant a Special Permit for a Planned Unit Development for construction and use of no more than 520 residential condominium units pursuant to Fafard's Application upon and in accordance with the provisions, conditions and procedures set forth below: I. Based upon the written materials submitted to the Board as well as oral communications received at the Public Hearing and other public meetings of the Board, the Board makes the following findings: - T - '98/TZ/Z uo -uPLP Bm u Cu.. P@49TeP PIPH 6UTUUPTd C ] Ov( i�frl, A. The Planned Unit Development has been designed with various types of land uses which can be combined in a compatible relationship with each other as a totally planned development. B. The design of the Planned Unit Development is compatible with the existing or potential development of the surrounding neighborhoods. C. A plan for the total property has been submitted to the Board which clearly details the manner in which the subject area is to be developed and the means that will be employed to protect the abutting property and the health, safety, welfare and privacy enjoyed thereon in accordance with the requirements of Section VII-O 3.b of the Ordinance. D. Section VII-0 3.d of the Ordinance does not apply to the Planned Unit Development as it is not located adjacent to or across the street from existing residential developments. E. The Planned Unit Development is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Ordinance and the Master Plan of the City of Salem and will promote the purposes of Section VII-O of the Ordinance asset forth in Subsection 2 thereof. F. The Planned Unit Development will not result in a net negative environmental impact. H. The parcel containing the Planned Unit Development contains more than sixty thousand (60,000) square feet. ' q nx u`711nr545 II. The Special Permit and the exercise of the rights granted hereunder shall be subject to the following conditions: A. Traffic 1. Following the comprehensive traffic study to be undertaken by the City to determine the traffic needs of Swampscott Road, an easement, to be defined by the Planning Board, shall be granted for the widening of Swampsscott Road along the southerly side of the developer's property to allow for an increase in roadway capacity. Such easement shall be provided by the developer in a form satisfactory to the City Planner and the City Solicitor. In addition, the developer shall bring to grade the area of said easement to permit the widening, and shall construct an adequate sub-base. 2. The developer shall work cooperatively with the City in planning appropriate improvements for the intersection of Swampscott Road and Highland Avenue and the developer shall contribute toward such improvements, as mutually agreed to by the Board and developer prior to approval of the second phase of the development. B. Visual Impacts/Site Design 1. No building permit shall be issued for any dwelling unit or other structure in the Planned Unit Development unless and until a Site Plan including such dwelling unit or other structure shall have been submitted to and approved by the Planning Board pursuant to the provisions of Section VII-R of the Zoning Ordinance and the Planning Board Rules and Regulations and subject to the further review criteria set forth herein: A.1. The Fafard Canpanies will provide an easement and sub-base for the widening of Swampscott Road along the southerly side of its property, based on the Fay, Spofford & Thorndike Traffic Study of 4/16/87 and engineering and design plans to be prepared under the auspices of The Fafan9 Campanies. 2. This work has previously been completed. B.1. Phase IIIA site plan delivered to the City Clerk and the Planning Board Department on January 27, 1995 with Special Permit fee check. i _ 2 _ a. Parking and loading facilities b. Traffic circulation c. Adequacy of access d. Lighting e. Landscaping and screening f. Waste disposal g. Snow removal h. Drainage i. Utilities j. Pedestrian circulation k. Protection and enhancement of natural features 1. Architecture The Planning Board reserves the right to further waive the requirements of this Permit under the Site Plan Review process. 2. No site plan showing less than 80 condominium dwelling units shall be submitted to or approved by the Board except for the final site plan to be submitted for the construction of all remaining units permitted hereunder. 3. The site plans submitted to the Board shall provide for the development of the Planned Unit Development in phases of no more than 130 dwelling units. 3a.Each site plan and phase shall provide for an adequate physical separation from each other phase, with such mechanism of separation to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board. 4.There shall be no eight unit buildings within the Planned Unit Development unless specifically permitted by the Planning Board. No structures shall contain more than four (4) dwelling units, unless specifically permitted by the Planning Board. 1. a. Each unit in Phase IIIA has a minimum of 3.5 parking spaces. b See site plan - traffic circulation is adequate. c. See site plan - access is adequate. d. See site plan - building area lighting is adequate (sheet 2) . e. See site plan - landscaping is adequate (sheet 2) . f. Follows procedures established under Phase I review (see attached 3/17/86 letter) . Regarding to be as presently provided for in previous phases. g. See site plan (sheets for locations) . h. See site plan (sheets 2,3,4) . i. See site plan (sheets 2,3,4) . j. 9000, of sidewalk provided along both sides of whalers Lane. k. See site plan. 1. Building styles are short and long L units as constructed in previous phases. 2. Salem Planning Board approved a waiver January 12, 1995 to allow submission of Phase IIIA which includes 20 units rather than 80 units. 3. a. Phase IIIA is 20 units and is separated from other phases by Whalers Lane or the North and West; wetlands or the East and South. 4. No structure in Phase IIIA will contain more than four (4) dwelling units. - 3 - . . _. 5. A plan fora pass ive recreation trail linked with the ancient trail referenced in the Environmental impact Report prepared by HMM Associates shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to approval of any site plan and provided that each site plan shall provide for such passive recreation trail. 6. Foundations and utilities shall be constructed and inspected prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. A plan entitled "Typical Plateau Grading", dated January 3, 1986, as previously presented to the Planning Board, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Planning Board, and amendents shall be required as necessary, and all grading shall be constructed according to such plan as amended. 8. All landscaping and screening within the development shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Board. a. Mature trees shall be a minimum caliper established by the Planning Board. Shrub diameters shall also be a minimum established by the Planning Board b. Maintenance of vegetation shall be the responsibility of the developer or his successors in interest. C. Following the definition of an adequate per dwelling unit landscaping budget as determined by the City Planner, the developer shall comply with such budget. installed as required through the Site 9. Sloped granite curbing shall be Plan Review Process. Final approval of location and type of curbing shall be made by the Planning Board. 5. a. The 9000' of Whalers Lane sidewalks provide the equivalent of a passive recreation trail. 6. Agree. 7. No plateau grading to be included in Phase IIIA. 8. a. See landscaping plan (sheet 3) which follows Phases I and II landscaping requirements. b. Maintenance will be the responsibility of a private management ccapany hired by the Homeowner's Association. c. landscaping budget for Phase III to be $3,230 per unit. ($336,000/104 units = 3,230) Phase III Budget = $336,000 Phase II Budget = $512,000 Phase I Budget = $688,000 Total Budget = $1,536,000 9. Sloped granite curbing is shown in bold lines on sheet 3 at the driveway entrances to Whalers Lane. ti - 4 - BOOP, toi 7 ��r5.2 10.Building colors shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board. The Planning Board will require earth tone colors or colors which are compatible with the surrounding environment. 11.Exterior building designs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board. Such approval shall require that each design be of a residential nature, and include the use of clapboard, shingles, texture 111, or other wood products. 12. There shall be no curb cuts along First Street. In addition, any residential units located along First Street shall be adequately set back and a dense tree screen shall be placed to visually screen units from First Street. Such screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board in the same fashion that all other landscaping and screening shall be so reviewed and approved. 13.Each site plan shall provide for a common area for each phase of the development of a size and location which the Board determines is necessary or appropriate to provide for recreational use by the dwellings in such phases. 14.The Developer and the City shall pursue the possibility of creating water or ponding on the site. C. Waste Water Services 1. Adequacy of wastewater pipes shall be approved by the Engineering Department. 2. A minimum of 10' horizontal separation shall be maintenaned between water snd sewer pipes. 3. Minimum cover, slopes, and vertical separation distances shall be maintained. 4. Easements for access to cross-country sewer lines shall be provided and approved by the Director of Public Services and City Planner. 10. The same six earth-tone colors approved for Phase II are proposed for Phase IIIA (dune gray, aspen green, spruce blue, sandstone, red cedar, desert sand) and natural redwood. 11. Phase IIIA will incorporate 4-plex designs as approved for Phase II. Designs have been enlarged and inproved with enclosed entrances and improved master, bedroom/bath areas. 12. Not applicable to Phase IIIA. 13. Agree. 14. DEP rejected "ponding" in a 3/5/86 letter during Phase I review. (File #64-92) . Phase IIIA contains 2.98± acres. See sheet 1. C.I. To be done as part of Site Plan Review. C.2. Done on plans. C.3. Done on plans. C.4. Agree. - 5 - BOY 874°x549. D. Water Services 1. Distance to fire hydrants from units shall be shown on the plan and shall comply with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board and Fire Department. 2. Method of metering water connections and water hook-ups to individual units shall be approved by Engineering Department. E. Site Drainage 1. The updated drainage study currently being prepared by the developer shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Director of Public Services prior to commencement of re-grading and construction. 2. Discharge at the low point of catchment S-4 at the intersection of Swampscott Road and First Street, in the southwest corner of the first PUD approval, will not be increased beyond its present level of 110 cu. ft. per second. Such increases shall be minimized through construction of detention areas as recommended by drainage studies performed by HMM Associates and the updated drainage study now being completed. 3. Details of erosion control measures at drainage outlets in each phase shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Director of Public Services prior to issuance of building permits for that phase. 4. Outlets for discharges from building underdrains shall be shown on plans. Both outlets and drainage structures shall be approved by the Planning Department and Engneering Department. 5. Natural storage capacity of existing wetlands shall be fully maximized . The Director of Public Services and the City Planner shall confirm that such natural capacity has been maximized through analysis of the updated drainage study. D.1. All units are less than 500 feet from a fire hydrant. D.2. Individual Prater meters to be used for each unit in Phase IIIA E.1. Approved under Phase I review. E.2. Approved under Phase I review. E.3. See plan sheet 5. E.4. During Phase I review, Salem engineering requested details to be included on "as-built" plans (2/19/86), which we agreed to do. E.5. As with Phase I, all such capacity will be fully utilized within the parameters set by the DEP Order of Conditions #64-92. - 6 - �7 r . . �,Qil1 U�..l=1r�U1 C3O F. Wetlands 1. Salt as a de-icing agent is prohibited. 2. All proposed fill areas shall have sedimentation control barriers installed in areas within 50 feet of wetlands before any fill is placed. 3. Any inadvertent infringement on wetlands shall be compensated for in a manner as set forth in compensation procedures stated in DEQE Order of Condition 9164-92. 4. The DEQE Order of Conditions (9164-92) shall be strictly adhered to. 5. Copies of all wetland replication plans submitted to DEQE shall be sent to the Planning Board and shall be reviewed and approved by the Conservation Commission. G. Emergency Access 1. Each unit within the Planned Unit Development shall have adequate means, as approved by the Planning Board, to facilitate the location of units quickly in an emergency situation. 2. Fire alarm cables and alarm boxes shall be installed in accordance with specifications of the Fire Chief and City Electrician. 3_ Driveways to units less than 500' from Whalers Lane, along travelled roadways, shall be widened to 201. .. 4. Driveways to units greater than 500' from Whalers Lane along travelled roadways shall be widened to a minimum of 24'. 5. Provisions shall be made for U-turns at dead-end drives. Such provisions shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and Department of Public Services. 6 An informational signage plan shall be submitted to the City Planning Board prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. Such F.1. Agree. F.2. Agree. F.3. Agree. F.4. Agree. F.5. Agree. G.1. Unit numbering for Phase IIIA to be posted on signs at each driveway rather than garages to facilitate the location of units. G.2. The Fire Department will set the number and location of fire alarm boxes as part of its review of Phase IIIA plans. G.3. Done. G.4. Done G.5. The Fire Department and Department of Public Services will ccamment on this during its Phase IIIA plan review. G.6. A revised Information Sign Plan was submitted on January 28, 1987 and is being followed. Unit numbering is set by the City Assessor and Fire Department once each Phase's plans are ready for Planning Board approval. - 7 - K-7-41"T551 plan shall designate street names and unit numbers and their reasons for such. Unit numbers shall be clearly designated on each unit for ease in location by emergency vehicles. H. Health 1. All units shall be equipped with trash compactors. 2. A licensed pest control firm shall be employed to perform a site evaluation prior to commencement of construction. Any further necessary rodent control procedures specified by the Board of Heath shall be carried out by the developer. 3. All concerns relating to public helath shall be reviewed and i approved by the Board of Health. I. Electrical I. All electrical wiring shall be placed in rigid conduit unless otherwise permitted by the City Electrician. 2. Location and installation of street lighting shall be the responsilibility of the developer subject to approval of the City Electrician. 3. All electrical utilities within Whalers Lane shall be constructed as required by Massachusetts Electrical Standards specifications. J. General 1. Each phase of development will have a separate condominium association, or such other differentiation of governance as the Planning Board shall approve. 2. There shall be no further subdivision of the land except to permit the phasing of condominiums to be constructed on the land. 3. The subdivision road shown as Whalers Lane shall be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit for the 260th residential dwelling unit. H.1. The Planning Board waived this condition 3/27/86. H.2. A licensed pest control firm shall be employed and the requirement of the Board of Health will be met. H.3. We are following the City Health Tlep rtment,s Phase I requirements for all four Phases (see attached letter to Robert Blenkhorn, from Roar Killian dated 3/17/86) . I.1. Agree. I.2. Agree. I.3. Agree. J.1. Agree. J.2. Agree. J.3. All of Whalers Lane has been constructed with a binder course. Top coat has been completed on the east side of Whalers Tam. Construction of the remainder of the top coat for Whalers Lane must await completion o Phases II'I, and IV. We also want to avoid adverse impacts caused by heavy construction machinery travelling only along the westerly half of Whalers Lane. - 8 - 4. A certificate of compliance or approval signed by a majority of the members of the Board shall constitute conclusive evidence of the completion of matters set forth therein if and when recorded with the Essex County Registry of Deeds. 5. The special permit granted hereunder shall lapse within two years if a substantial use thereof has not sooner commenced except for good cause, or if construction has not begun by such date except for good cause. If construction does not proceed in a consistent and timely manner as defined by the Planning Board, such Special Permit shall be revoked upon such determination by the Planning Board. 6. If Fafard or its successors or assigns shall make any use of the Planned Unit Development other than as set forth herein, the Board, after notice to Fafard and the holding of a public hearing, may revoke this permit for all buildings for which a Certifcate of occupancy has not been issued and all land within the Planned Unit Development which has not yet been built upon. 7. Upon request of Fafard, any provision of this Special Permit may be waived or amended by a majority vote without the need for further public hearing of the Planning Board. 8. This Special Permit shall expire seven years from date noted herein with respect to those units for which building permits have not been issued. Time may be extended subject to approval of the Planning Board. THi=_ FAFARO C0MPAWlE=E3 ;t r, 1,111:f+lfi r 1U_11 Nisch 17, 19_86 Nr- Robert E_, Blenkhorn, C.H.O. Health Agent Salem Board of Health 9 North Street Saler, lu Oi970 RE: Ledcaere Country II,P.U.D. Phase 1 Hcalth Department Comments Dcar Mr. Blenkhorn: The following responses are based on your letters of Februar__ 18, 'lar.-h r, la.k.i. February 6), and 'larch 13, 1986, my letter of ,larch S, 1936, tiled dirruss? „ _, have Ica.'. up to and including today. This Letter meets all of your P.oa.-d ':: retuire- nents, as we have discussed. 1- Approvals from the City Engineering Department and City Plunbin;; Lu�ccfor will be obtained for all utility tie-in designs. 2. 1'e will have the water services tested for pressure, and bacterial testing will be done through a certified laboratory as requested- Copies of the resulting reports will be forwarded to, the Planning Dept_ and Board of Health- 3_ All building construction spoils are to be gathered in on-site dunpsters and hauled away to an authorized landfille, as has been done to date with our associated Salem projects. Suitable vegetative debris will be mixed in with loam, allowed to decompose on site for two years, and then screened for loam, which will be used in project landscaping_ , The composting pile(s) will be stored at a distance from the residential units to discourage residential dumping on these pile sites. Lime will be added to the compost piles to increase pH and help decrease the decomposition period. The Condominium Association's property management company will maintain and conduct a surveillance program of these sites. A pest control Program under a licensed firm will be instituted for these sites if necessary. 4. Dust control and street cleaning will be handled with the on-site 5000 gallon water tanker and with a sweeper that is contracted as needed. 5. The maintenance and cleanint, of catchbasins associa Ecd with private will be the responsibility of the Condominium Association. It will hire :: msintenance f:rm to keeP UP :JI the common areas, ilecluding the basins. Tile Fafard will be responsible for tile !:baler's L:ul.• catchbasins until the road is accented as a city street. 6. Northeast Exterminators of Essex, HA is handling our pest control program for our Salem sites. Russell ilenderson is revising and expanding his current proposal based on our site visit today. This will be forwarded to you by *Larch 26. You already have th6 February 28, 1986 Animal Rescue Leaoue of Roston wildlife report:.' 7. We submit the following trash storage and disposal plan with the followini; ,conditions: A. The Private hoceowners, through their Condominium Association, will pay for the collection and disposal of their trash by a private contractor. B. It is in these homeowners' self-interest to ensure timely, sanitary, and adequate trash removal from their dwellings at a Pre-scheduled time. C. It is expected that less trash per unit will be generated by these two- bedroon residcn^es than by tunical single fanily residences. } U. Tile containers or bundles of household trash and garden and lawn w:;stc will lie placed at the outer edge of the sidewalk appurtenant to the_ premises of the owner no earlier than 6:00 p.m. the dar precedin, collection and no later that{ 7:00 a .m. the day of collectico aad :;ill be removed from the residential development of the designated day of collection. The Condominium Association and its private trash removal contractor will be responsible for the. proper removal and disposal of said trash to an approved off-site location. E. Should conditions warrant, the Condominium Association would increase the number 8f pickups per week. Yours truly, Ronald S. Killian Planning, and Land Use Coordinator ^.SK/ap cc: Salem Planning 2o:rd J.4. — J.5. — J.6. — J.7. We respectfully request a Waiver of Conditions J.3. in order to avid major disturbance of a capleted street by heavy construction machinery and installation of underground services once approvals are received for Phases III and Iv. J.8. An extension of the Special Perntit was voted on by the Planning Board in March of 1992 to March of 1997. - 9 - Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, the Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. pp.� Walter B. Power, III /\�1 4 Chairman Date JUN 2 4 1986 I hereby certify that 20 days have expired A TRUE COPY ATTEST from the date this instrument was received, cnd that NO APPEAL has been filed in This �> A Tree Copy ! nT7�$7: r T. c `r _L R C K �. i J eph6ne�. r "�, C_ty Clerk a em, Mass. d BOOK '.1-71°C554 0 *XoII 21�C11T� ?TAS2XC lxSE S v' . r z Planning PIIarb eq a r^ 'GG JRe�,kn+cs One � �H alem reel[ June 18, 1986 Mr. Howard Fafard The Fafard Companies 290 Eliot Street Ashland, MA. 01701 i Dear Mr. Fafard: On February 20, 1986, the Planning Board voted, by a vote of eight in favor, none opposed, to waive language stated in the Planned Unit Development Special Permit dated February 7, 1986, pursuant to paragraph J. 7, as follows: Page Two of said Special Permit, third paragraph, shall now read, "Accordingly the Board has unanimously voted to grant a Special Permit for a . Planned Unit Development for construction and use of 520 residential condominium units pursuant to Fafard' s Application upon and in accordance with the provisions, conditions and procedures set forth below:" Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely yours, Walter B. Power, III Chairman V ,.1b£} •.:;r 4z 3'`3' Nf r ^ y #x P.` p - .•`'� -:4 ..w:: z.°5k" xrvc 4. '�Cj s�{'�nlr Ri`y"'qzVV , ..e ' ?IF+P �'.� -r.' �:` - -- ----- ---- -- r3:' fat v $ a. r��.i5'/r�s ..y4A "Tp �affi .tt�•lF tY,s Li W O O — 77� :9 ® O 9 'b0'I I i 1w TF .-: pp WI I 71 4 Y EO I IN I �6oAFc�J �" Exvas�v — AhPHA�T hUING�-6� u� r ® r O G�APP�ocR� ( Co ExPohE�� Ll rr /r r L•u'ti1�s' ELL $lU.2lev( /f�G°>LO V 1Z Q�Ct L Ej f I I I I I I I I �INDD�i./ V.fELV I I � I T fit: Nam 1�, ' 11� uo7 a�� Q O � a O ® " 0 00 0 0 O O ® m O - Rn'b q.y u n5-.4 wZA7 G-.L a c �s Z/1 L/1 o O'Zl ❑ p O p u oq 'qu, i 3 0 II v - ❑ ❑ ❑ 4 II tt � ❑ � � Q II uarwA bwu4 - - I vrozA +wzn - WOOYDUIAIJ u ® ® ® ® uvq bu1f41 ; tt t Rib u i a i 4 av)rGs.0 , Q ® tto o I N 0 0 N a 4 , .A-.9 .0-.0 .b .Z-.9 nl-.4 .FAZ-'a Ilk nZA6-.B - v. %aaVLaVLa , D >� "61 "v---a za nm 77� U07 aYLL rwm I; uel j uolrpunod -� ..0-.9 .A-,B O v4yP�tln^'93°rPd rnrn I o Y PM'4I� r - 1d '}UaWaSL�� I G . ggW-j� a'U9W PNWJ .FhY-'S .Fhl-'4 .F/It �U7�V P•Wl r7°A Mq w+`d �c��r+rTt SOPA.Y h4q �I � � • it V .ZI c 0 — ® ca»a�=lira £ II £ alb. 7+oda0NN11S 00 it $ g u Q ti � Q I tt ' p ----------- II tt 00 II Y/IL— i II st ozlM E17 II II �^u7W w�P4 JOBKV FIfPU i Ct tt !Tl11 F �I �uawase4 �uawasr?g Q . O O