Loading...
260-262 ESSEX STREET - BUILDING JACKET 260 262 Essex St. (situ of *a1em, MUSSUc4usetts Public Propertq Oepurtment Guilbing Department (One 6alem (Sreen 508-745-9595 fid. 390 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer January 6, 1995 New Essex Realty Trust C/o Liberty Realty Trust 262 Essex Street Salem, Mass. 01970 RE: 262 Essex Street To Whom it May Concern: This office has received a complaint regarding the number of units at the above mentioned property. This property is a legal (2) two family dwelling unit located in a R-2 District. It cannot be used as a (3) three family dwelling. Please contact this office upon receipt of this letter so we can resolve this problem as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, e Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc: Dave Shea Councillor Donahue, Ward 3 Certified Mail # P 921 991 666 ' ARTICLE P 921 991 666 UNE 1• New Essex Realty Trust NUMBER Vo Liberty Realty Trust 262 Essex Street Salem, Mass. 01970 t FOLD AT PERFORATION t Ix WALZ INSERT IN STANDARD#10 WINDOW ENVELOPE. c E R T I E 1 E R M A. I L E R M �. t �., LIBERTY REALTY TRUST 262 ESSEX STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3434 January 30, 1995 Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Buildings City of Salem Building Department 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: January 6, 1995 letter regarding Liberty Realty Trust, 262 Essex Street, Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Tremblay: Reference is made to your January 6, 1995 letter, our telephone conversation on January 9, 1995, as well as the copy of the January 6, 1995 letter I received in the mail today (copy enclosed). As you know, the above referenced property is an office condominium unit and not a two (2) or three (3) family dwelling unit. Thank you. Sincerely, r William E. Shanahan Trustee WES:kng Enclosure Tito of *tt1Em. massar4usttts VuhCu Frupertg Mcpartment 0 S 8uilbing i9epartment (One Belem (6reen 508-745-4545 �[t. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer January 6, 1995 New Essex Realty Trust c/o Liberty Realty Trust 262 Essex Street Salem, Mass. 01970 RE: 262 Essex Street To Whom it May Concern: This office has received a complaint regarding the number of units at the above mentioned property. This property is a legal (2) two family dwelling unit located in a R-2 District. It cannot be used as a (3) three family dwelling. Please contact this office upon receipt of this letter so we can resolve this problem as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, n Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc: Dave Shea Councillor Donahue, Ward 3 Certified Mail # P 921 991 666 ����y l (kmM pY ������. , acne f :.L�t� c��'M �eA��"���e- �4��� ENDER: • Complete items t and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the • Complete nems 3,and 4.s b. following services(for an extra fee): • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to yon. 1. ❑ Addressee's Address • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not permit. • Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt Fee will provide yw the signature of the person delivered to and the date of derver . Consult postmaster for fee._ 3.Article Addressed to 4a.Article Number dear Essex Realty Trust P 921 991 6 6 6 C/O Llbert;, Realty iruSt 4b.Service Type 262 Fazi it-reet. Sale-a, 11fais, 01970 CERTIFIED 7.D1 fD ' ery 5.Sit —(Addressee) .A dressee's Address (ONLY if requested and fee paid.) 6. ignature—(Agent) PS Form 3811,November 1990 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT United States Postal Service t Official Business CC PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE,$300 INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MA 01970-3724 PosTAGEPOSTMARK OR DATE o RETURN SHOW TO WHOM,DATE AND RESTRICTED W RECEIPT ADDRESS OF DELIVERY DELIVERY 7 6 O SERVICE DEWIFIED FEE+RETURN RECEIPT W y TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES A Z w NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED m¢ SENT TO. NOT FOR INTERNADONALMAIL uL Q Oz New Essex Realty Trust F c/o Liberty Realty Trust !RR 262 Essex Street Yo u Salem, Mass. 01978 y V, U� D. PS FORM 3800 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL o a' uwreo smres � PoSTLLSERIICE i STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES(see front). 1. If you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article,leaving the receipt attached,aria'present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carder(no extra charge). 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article,date,detach and retain the receipt,and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt,write the certified-mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card,Form 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits.Otherwise,affix to back of article.Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. '-' 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee,or to an authorized agent of the addressee,endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt.If return receipt is requested,check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. (Mg Of ftem, massac4usttts � r Public Propertq Eepartment Guilbing i9epartment (One dalem firan 500-745-9595 p9. 300 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer January 6, 1995 New Essex Realty Trust c/o Liberty Realty Trust 262 Essex Street Salem, Mass. 01970 RE: 262 Essex Street To Whom it May Concern: This office has received a complaint regarding the number of units at the above mentioned property. This property is a legal (2) two family dwelling unit located in a R-2 District. It cannot be used as a (3) three family dwelling. Please contact this office upon receipt of this letter so we can resolve this problem as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Leo E. Trembles y Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc: Dave Shea Councillor Donahue, Ward 3 Certified Mail # P 921 991 666 � � � � I, i � �� �� _- �._ _ -_ ��o cs' eACA(74, C014Cof, l>.til.0., F,4,,�,P. State of the Art Family Dental Care September 30, 1993 Dear Mr. Luster, I have received Mr. Tremblay 's letter dated September 28, 1993 . Please ask the Salem Redevelopment Authority to review their earlier decision in lght of the recent Board of Appeals' decision. Please note that the Design Review Board already gave their verbal approval at their meeting on May 19 , 1993. Sincerely, Steven A. Corben, D.M.D. , F.A.G.D. cc: Leo Tremblay, ZEO Board of Appeals Councillor Furfaro Two Hundred Sixty Essex Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Telephone (508) 745-4499 SENDER Complete I also wish to receive the Cete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. • complete items 3,and 4a a It, following services(for an extra fee): • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so ih:lt we can return this card to ya,,. 1. ❑ Addressee's Address • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not permit. • write'Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt Fee will provide you the signature of the person delivered to and the date of delivery. Consult postmaster for fee. 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number P 921 991 545 Ur. Cor bitx.,, 260 1.33ex Street 4b.Service Type 543Lm, HA 01910 CERTIFIED 7.Date of Delivery 5.Sign tur —(Addressee) 8.Addressee's Address (ONLY it requested and tee paid.) 6.Signature—(Agent) PS Form 3811,November 1990 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT United States Postal Service s S •�I I` IT Official Business �W�, ;993 .. ... PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE,$300 Illu�u�lll�l��ln�lll�n��ll�l���l����l�lnll���ll INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MA 01970-3724 ���••���(Jaa ARTICLE P 921 991 545 LINE 1 Dr. Corbin NUMBER 260 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 F FOLD AT PERFORATION r r I t t F WALZ INSERT IN STANDARD#10 WINDOW ENVELOPE. CI I I F I E D M n r hill A M E N� � y ` CfitV of �ttlEut, fiRttssar4usietts �'• `' Ilublic jorapertp Department INuillting Department (One Salem (6reen 500-745-9595 Ext. 300 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer September 28, 1993 Dr. Steven Corbin 260 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Illegal Signs Dear Dr. Corbin: I have received a letter from Salem Redevelopment Authority's Executive Director, William Luster regarding the neon signs you have at 260 Essex Street. These signs are a violation of the Board of Appeal decision which states that you must have the approval of the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Design Review Board. As to date no approval has been given for these signs. You are therefore ordered to removed these signs immediately upon receipt of this notice. Failure to comply will leave us no choice but to take the appropriate legal action. Sincerely Leo E. Tremblay Zoning Enforcement Officer LET:bms cc: W. Luster, SRA Board of Appeal Councillor Furfaro \crbn\ Certified Mail #P 921 991 545 Salem BOARD OF DIRECTORS Redevelopment Ian Boudreau ear Barbara Cleary William Guenther Authority Paul LHeureux William E. Luster Executive Director September 22, 1993 Mr. Leo Tremblay, Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 10970 Subject: Sign Permit for Steven Corbin, 260 Essex Street Dear Leo: I am writing on behalf of the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA), to request that the decision of the City of Salem Board of Appeal be enforced regarding the petition by Steven Corbin for a variance from the Salem Sign Ordinance. As you know, Mr. Corbin erected two neon signs at his place of business, which is located in an Urban Renewal District, without the approval of the SRA. After being cited for installing the signs without a permit, Mr. Corbin applied to the SRA for approval of the two existing signs. Mr. Corbin's application for approval was denied by the SRA Board of Directors, and he then petitioned the Board of Appeal for a variance from the Salem Sign Ordinance which required him to receive approval from the SRA for signage installed within the Urban Renewal District (Section 3-51). Mr. Corbin's variance was granted by the Board of Appeal with the condition that he obtain approval from the Salem Redevelopment Authority (see attached). At this time, Mr. Corbin is not in compliance with the variance granted due to the fact that his signage has not been approved by the Salem Redevelopment Authority. I respectfully request that you enforce the provisions of the variance granted by the Board of Appeal and inform Mr. ,Corbin that his existing signage is illegal. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerel. , illi m ster Executi irector j:Xorbiettr.BOA - One Salem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • (508) 745-9595, Ext. 311 • Fax (508) 744-5918 C �. (fitU of �ttlem, ��ttssttcljusefts � �., 7-i , s RECEIVED BnarD of rAupeal w SEP p 9 1993 Salem etaniong wept. r7 CD - a �� ao DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN A. CORBIN FOR VARIANCE AT 260 ESSEX STREET (B-5) A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed, Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow two (2) existing neon signs to remain in the windows of his dental business. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: I. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Salem Redevelopment Authority was not in favor and urged the Board of Appeal to deny this request. 2. There was one (1) citizen, David Pelletier, who voiced his opposition, his concern being that neon signs could become commonplace in the downtown. 3. The Board reviewed pictures of other businesses in the area that had neon signs. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN A. CORBIN FOR VARIANCES AT 260 ESSEX STREET, SALEM page two 4. The signs have already been purchased and were of great expense, removing them would be a major loss to Dr. Corbin. 5. Dr. Corbin depends on these signs for purpose of identification of his dental office. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Signs are to remain in accordance with the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit for the signs. 4. Petitioner shall obtain approval of the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Design Review Board. VARIANCE GRANTED August 11, 1993 v N 7 I Stephen O'Grady, Member 1�1 Board of Appeal c ' O` DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN A. CORBIN FOR VARIANCES AT 260 ESSEX STREET, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n H rn o c+� �� to Salem BOARD OF DIRECTORS Redevelopment loan Boudreau Barbara Cleary Authority William Guenther Paul CHeureux William E. Luster Executive Director July 27, 1993 Mr. Frank Grealish, Chairman Board Of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Subject: Sign Variance - Dr. Corben, 260 Essex Street Dear Chairman Grealish: I am writing on behalf of the Salem Redevelopment Authority in regard to a petition by Dr. Steven Corben, 260 Essex Street, for a variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance. As you may know, Dr. Corben's office is located in the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) Urban Renewal District. This distinction requires that the SRA Board of Directors approve any exterior facade renovations, including the installation of new signs. Dr. Corben's signs were installed without any permits from the City or approvals from the SRA. After being informed of this violation by the Building Inspector, Dr. Corben completed the proper applications for approval. The SRA voted to deny Dr. Corben's request for two neon signs, due to the fact that current SRA policies dictate that neon is only permitted for "entertainment, recreation, eating, drinking, hotels and lodging establishments." (see attached SRA Sign Manual) For the reasons stated above, I am writing to express the Salem Redevelopment Authority's opposition to the petition of Dr. Steven Corben for a variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance which would permit him to install two neon signs at his place of business. At the present time, the signs are illegal and should be removed immediately, as previously requested by the SRA and the Building Inspector. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Joan Boudreau Chairperson cc: Building Inspector d2sreIt5alem Green • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 0 (508) 745-9595, Fact. 311 9 Fax (508) 744-5918 Chi of ttlem, � ttssttcl�usetts peal J p c, O Lo — a o LZ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN A. CORBIN FOR VARIANCE AT 260 ESSER STREET (B-5) A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed, Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow two (2) existing neon signs to remain in the windows of his dental business. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: I. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Salem Redevelopment Authority was not in favor and urged the Board of Appeal to deny this request. 2. There was one (1) citizen, David Pelletier, who voiced his opposition, his concern being that neon signs could become commonplace in the downtown. 3. The Board reviewed pictures of other businesses in the area that had neon signs. r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN A. CORBIN FOR VARIANCES AT 260 ESSEX STREET, SALEM page two 4. The signs have already been purchased and were of great expense, removing them would be a major loss to Dr. Corbin. 5. Dr. Corbin depends on these signs for purpose of identification of his dental office. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: I. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Signs are to remain in accordance with the plans and dimensions submitted. 3 . Petitioner shall obtain a building permit for the signs. 4. Petitioner shall obtain approval of the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Design Review Board. VARIANCE GRANTED August 11, 1993 (._1+78.0 Stephen O'Grady, Member Board of Appeal - n 0 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN A. CORBIN FOR VARIANCES AT 260 ESSEX STREET, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n y m �T ^� o �� a ENDER: • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the • Complete items 3,and 4a&b. following services (for an extra • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): return this card to you. • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address does not permit. • Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. 2 ❑ Restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt Fee will provide you the signature of the person delivers to and the date of delivery. Consult postmaster for fee. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number Dr. Corbin, D.M.D. P 009 22.6 292 260 Essex St. 4b. Service Type Salem, MA 01970 ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Certified ❑ COD ❑ Express MailRetrh iurn Receipt for 7. Date of Deli ery 5. ig ture (Ad ress�eP1 9. Addressee's Address(Only if requested C> C� - and fee is paid) 6. Si nature(Agent) c RS Form 3811, November 1990 *U.S.GPO:1991-287-M DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE I 111 Official Business � - _ - c � - sr PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, 3300 Print your name, address and ZIP Code here • Leo E. Tremblay, Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 r _ __ _.� � �__ � �� . i { G��' � ,�' � i . � { Tito of ttlEm, ttssttr uoetts Ilublic 11ropertp Department Nuilbing Department (9ne *alem (6reen 508-745-9595 Ext. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer April 28, 1993 Dr. Corbin, D.M.D. 260 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Illegal Sign 260 Essex Street Dear Sir: It has been brought to my attention that you are in violation of the City of Salem Sign Ordinance relative to a sign at the above referenced property. The illegal sign has not been approved by the Salem Redevelopment Authority. The sign I am referring to is the neon sign in the storefront window. You are hereby notified to contact the Planning Dept. within (7) days of receipt of this notice to apply for the proper permits. Failure to comply will result in the necessary legal action being taken. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me. I thank you in advance for your prompt and courteous cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Leo E. Tremblay Zoning Enforcement Officer l Inspector of Buildings LET:bms cc: Planning Director Councillor Harvey, Ward 2 Certified Mail #P 009 226 292 /signs/ MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1983 On Wednesday, September 14, 1983 the members of the Design Review Board met at One Salem Green, Salem, MA with the following members in attendance: John Emerson, Frederick Johnson, Joy Cowan and John Fright_ A motion was made by Frederick Johnson, seconded by Joy Cowan and unanimously approved to accept the minutes of the meeting of August 10, 1983. DISCUSSION: {y262'Essex St.- Robert Scagliotti was present to submit brick and shingle samples. Brick will be Stonehill. Shingle will be black pepper/Nanutcket smooth. DRB ACTION: Approved SRA ACTION: ca {Forrester's Corner'- Brick samples, Stonehill and shingle sa 3es;'black`d` pepper/Nantucket smooth were`'submitted. ' cs DRA ACTION: Approved in c . . SRA ACTION: The Salem Inn mj Diane Pabich was present to to bring sketch of the design-for a sign to be located at the corner of the driveway. The Board felt a "bed & breakfast" aspect should be emphasized in the sign. It was also suggested that 'a banner might be more effective for vehicular traffic. DRA ACTION: Approved subject to modification of sign with wording readjusted so as to emphasize bed & breakfast aspect. A drop-eff of resubmission will be required. SRA ACTION: (Empire Clothing - sign - New sign at rear of the building will have 24" individual letters, 2" deep fabricated stainless steel with a baked enamel red finish to match the awning color at the front of the store. The existing sign will be removed. Lighting of the sign will be another matter to be discusses separately. DRA ACTION: Approved, with the exception of lighting SRA ACTION: DRB 9/14/83 Page 2 Travel World y June Brown presented materials and sketch for banner on the front of the building. The Board suggested smaller letters on a diagonal angle on the same base line (on both sides of the banner)_ The design would be repeated on both sides of the banner. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval subject to S.R.A. SRA ACTION: Masonic Temple`- Staley McDermet along with Andrea Fish of the Salem Planning Department presented landscaping/architectural plans for the rear of the building. Reference here is made to the site plan dated 9/14/83 as presented to the Board. DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: _ --- (Beef&Oyster The Board recommended approval of the three lights on the Derby Sq. side of the building at the positioning level as indicated_ DRB ACTION: Recommended approval SRA ACTION: A motion was made by Fred Johnson, seconded by Joy Cowan and unanimously approved that the meeting of the Design Review Board .stands adjourned, Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Morrison CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION I. Richard T. McIntosh, Building Inspector for the City of Salem, Massachusetts, do hereby certify that the construction performed on the premises located at 260-262 Essex Street, Salem, Massachusetts, as more fully described in a deed of the City of Salem to Robert L. Scagliotti and Nackey E. Scagliotti, Trustees of R N S Realty Trust dated August 31, 1983 , and recorded in Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 7227, Page 295, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City of Salem. This certificate constitutes a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the covenants in the Contract for Sale of Land for Private Development dated August 23, 1983, recorded in Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 7227, Page 279 and in the aforesaid deed recorded in Book 7227 , Page 295 with respect to the obligation of Robert L. Scagliotti and Nackey E. Scagliotti, Trustees of R N S Realty Trust and its successors and assigns to construct a building on the site described in said deed and with respect to all dates for the beginning and completion thereof. This Certificate of Completion is issued in compliance with Section 6 of the aforesaid Contract for Sale of Land for Private Development. Signed this oAgyY day of August, 1984. ICHARD T. MCINTOSH COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS cl".W* X1111984 Then personally appeared the above named Richard T. McIntosh and acknowledged the foregoing to be his free act and deed, before me *TVAY�� commission expires: 2 ♦•- 0e�y.GOAO�A'� Ctu Yx A whLtU[III$ �IIclri� !� ���� Ae�thas oo1i' ld1T.6 cilYili Griern i f i May 4, 1984 Ms. Josephine Fusco, City Clerk City Hall Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Ms. Fusco: - - At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board held on May 4, 1984,it was voted to endorse "Approval under Subdivision Control Law not required" on the following described plan: 1. Applicant: Arthur F. Wonson, Trustee Jenbec Realty Trust 35 Taylor Street Saugus, MA. 2. Location and Description:<76 2„Essex,Street _ ._ . Clarification of subdivision subject to the approval of a condominium conversion permit by, the Board of Appeal_ Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry- Sincerely yours, , e Walter B_ Power, IIS Chairman WBP:dey - Ctv of '$ttlem, Aassuchusetts 2 p3 Planning Pnxrb lam{ Zug pall e4slrm,�aswtlinseNs 01970 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM"A" APPLICATIONS C� 03 See Form "A" applications for cn-< r+ complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten w or printed neatly in ink. =� 1: 7 % Date: April 26 1984 n a City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir. ` — I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- nip-g Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at __._36- -_Essex Street --__—�_ -----•--------------- ------------------------------ in Ward ----4--------- — (insert street and street numbers here) Signature of Ownerx... __ _ Art flur F. Wonson, Trustee Jentbee Realty Trust Street Address -__-__35_Taylor_ Street-_-_____—__—______ City/rown&State ---S4u9U-*-,--MA------- -------- Telephone _Saugu*_,-MA_______-_--__-_Telephone Number 233-7524 flit of �Wem, Abosadjusetts QTifg�a11 j9a6m,4Hawadpoetts 01970. FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must cu be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one G. copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and rt < 7 applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed =_ 2 1 in ink. Salem,Mass., April 26,— ''��_8. 4,�0 To the Planning Board: n i rn � The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) ._It__depicts_on_existing Lot fronting in a public ^way and -------------- -does _ doesnot create any new boundaries ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- — -- -- ---- --- — and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner --- 4lpnson,_Trustee_ Jenbec Realty Trust__ Address_... Taylor Street, Saugus, MA — 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _-_ Address.....$5_Maple.Street,__Danvers, MA 3. Deed of property records in --------Essex---South--------------- -------- _________ Registry Book -----6196------------------------ . Page -5K ---- -----_—_-- 4. Location and Description of Property: .._ 362_Essex-Street,_Salem, M-- - -_ —_ - — See Exhitit "I" attached hereto, for legal description. - - ------------- --- --------------------------------------------------------------------—------------------------------------------ ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the plan t ether with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner--<---- ` -- - - - Arthur F. Wonson, Trustee Jenbec Realty Trust Address_-35_Taylor_Street-,--Saugus..-.MA_--------_-----------__.----- Telephone Number ....233-7524 - - - - — The land in Salem, Essex county, Massachis etts, being the premises numbered 3ti2 un Essex Street, and bounded and described as follows- SOUTHERLY by Essex Street, forty-three. and 80/1.00 (43.80) feet; MSTERLY by land nixa or formerly of Harris and Bertram: a NORT111:!ti.Y by land now or_formerly of May B. Brown and EAS'19:! 1,1' icy la: d now or formerly of Susan L. Brown, one hundred twenty-two and 15,/100 (122.15) feet. Bring the Sat;:e pr,!;td_ges conveyed to Timberline, Inc, by deed of Ito:7v: U. P•!ar:;l:all. et al, to be recorded herewith. 1, ' "ONo Ctv of assac.4me##s z Public PropertU Beyartutent �JRfO,NML IA�'t tg i'Yuilbing �Drpnrtnient Michnrb 0. ffidntas4 l (ane #nletn (Sreen 745-OZ13 February 27, 1985 RNS Realty Trust 33 Chestnut Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 260-262 Essex Street Building, Salem Gentlemen: As a follow-up to the attached letter from Peter M. Caron, Assistant Assessor, City of Salem, dated February 24, 1984, please be advised that the above referenced building is approved for occupancy as of February 24, 1984. Very Truly Yours, -� � ' �'a-kq,-J-- Richard T. McIntosh Inspector of Buildings City of Salem Encl .