Loading...
234 ESSEX STREET - BUILDING JACKET 234 ESSEX STREET i r . Cita of Salem, Massachusetts Fire Department i 48 Lafayette5nect ✓y�r „� „Celtrrt, 1,1`6.,acALLferts 01970.3695 Fire Prevrr,rwn ;nuvur 9✓ Cody TW 978-744-1235 93u reau Ja{ 978-745-4646 �� E 578745-7 777 q7g.7J-'6'49u cop Y(� Fountain' Place Restaurant 232 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 ATTN: Owner/Manager MAINTENANCE,CLEANING,AND TESTING OF FIXED FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS. MAINTENANCE. CLEANING OF HOOD AND DUCT SYSTEMS WHERE COOKING GREASE IS GENERATED................. The Salem Fire Prevention Bureau requires that all hood and dud systems are in be cleaned from the cooking area (hood) in the kitchen, all the way to the extreme and of the duet. THIS CLEANING M11j..L OCCUR ON A f19ARTERLY BASIS, A Certificate showing the name of the company, the person, and the date of the cleaning shall be posted near the hood area. The certificate will indicate what work was performed, and will also indicate areas not cleaned. ALL FIXED FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS ARE TG BE TESTED AND CHECKED ALW. ,NNUALLY. THIS TEST WILL ALSO INCLUDE A TEST OF THE INTERIOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. The cleaning company and the fixed extinguishing Service company shall file within (5) five days after the work is performed, a report with the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau of ail their activities relative to the above listed systems. The report shall also list any and all deficienees of the systems and the remedial action to be taken. Failure to adhere to this public safety requirement well resul in the shut down of the systems. Prior to resuming operations an inspection will be conducted by this office. Per Order, pJ( U. Erin Griffin Date of Conveyance Firs Marshal FORM SIR(4/05) CC: file Health Licensing Building 90 39vd H6iHdSIG nHId W37d5 Z0bE5bL8L6 94:80 900VEZ/80 fj CSS Architects Incorporated - Corporate Place 128 ARCHITECT'S Audubon Road,Building 2 FIELD Post Office Box 1460 Wakefield,Massachusetts 01880 (617)245-84W - REPORT PROJECT: THE ENDICOTT CENTER, SALEM FIELD REPORT NO. : 1 CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROD. NO. : 706 DATE: 15 May 1992 TIME: 2 : 30 pm Weather: Clear TEMP RANGE: 50" EST. % of COMPLETION: 70% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, -) : On Schedule WORK IN PROGRESS: PRESENT AT SITE: Carpentry Work Roger Bresnahan Electrical Work Dick Anderson HVAC Work John Savasta Granite Fabrication Stucco Fabrication OBSERVATIONS: 1. Two plywood panels on Essex Street have been removed on the ground floor to expose existing building to determine the proper location for the granite panels. 2 . Power service to building is underway and the transformer location has been selected. The transformer shall be located at the rear of Endicott Center North. 3 . A temporary AC unit was on site and is scheduled to be installed the week of 17 May 1992 . The location selected by the contractor will be adjacent to the intersection of the two story structure and the Endicott building. 4 . Samples for the spandrel glass were approved and the glass has been installed on the ground floor on the Endicott Building. 5. Shop drawings and samples for the stucco facade have been approved and fabrication is underway. 6 . The granite sample was approved and fabrication shall be underway as soon as all the plywood is removed from the ground floor. FIELD REPORT THE ENDICOTT CENTER Page 2 DIRECTIVES: 1. The granite header over the windows shall be installed as detailed. 2 . The granite pilaster returns at the windows shall vary in depth due to the irregularities of the window locations. 3 . The color of the banding above the windows on the ground floor shall match the granite sample. 4. Masonry work shall begin the week of 15 May 1992 at the lobby entry on Washington Street. ITEMS TO VERIFY: 1. The color for the stucco band above the second floor windows needs to be selected. Sample colors from the stucco manufacturer are required. 2 . The decision needs to be made regarding the removal of the protective plywood on the fifth and sixth floor dormers. cc: Roger Bresnahan Salem Building Department Jas , CSS Architects Incorporated Corporate Place 128 - ARCHITECT'S _ Audubon Road,Badd,o,2 FIELD Post Office Be.146) REPORT Wakefield,Massachusetts 01880 (617)245-8400 PROJECT: THE ENDICOTT CENTER, SALEM FIELD REPORT NO. : 2 CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROD. NO. : 706 DATE: 31 July 1992 TIME: 4 : 00 pm Weather: Clear TEMP RANGE: 80° EST. % of COMPLETION: 80% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+,-) : On Schedule WORK IN PROGRESS: PRESENT AT SITE: Dormer Finish Dick Anderson Vault Installation Stucco Finishers Depak - Mass Electric John Savasta OBSERVATIONS: 1. Exterior brick work at Lobby Area on Washington Street has been completed. 2 . The vaults under the sidewalk on Essex Street for the Massachusetts Electric Company transformers are installed. 3 . The primary conduit from the Mass Electric vault which will feed the pad mounted transformer in the rear of the building have been installed to a distance of 12 feet from the vault wall in the basement. 4 . The concrete pad for the transformer in the rear of the building has been placed and the conduit from the pad to the building has been installed. 5. The 5 dormers on the North face of the building are underway - and with some modification they will be ready for caulking. The second dormer in from the right needs panel adjustment at the lower portion of the face of the dormer, the panel needs to be pushed in closer to the building sheathing. 1 FIELD REPORT ENDICOTT CENTER Page 2 6. At the bottom of the dormer where the dormer face meets the roof there is an area of exposed metal that needs to be covered. 7 . The first low window on the bootery roof adjacent to the sloping slate roof requires a piece of counter flashing. 8 . The roof supporting the scaffolding is experiencing damage to the slate and some of the flashing. DIRECTIVES: None ITEMS TO VERIFY: None INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED: As built drawings for the primary and secondary services to the Mass Electric Vault and the pad mounted transformer will be required. ATTACHMENTS: None REPORTED BY: C John Savasta � ) cc: ; Salem Building Department- Dick Anderson John Savasta C55 Architects Incorporated Corporate Place 126 ARCHITECT'S Audubon Road,Building 2 FIELD Post Office Box 1460 Waketield,Massachusetts 01080 (617)245-6400 REPORT PROJECT: THE ENDICOTT CENTER, SALEM FIELD REPORT NO. : 3 CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROJ. NO. : 706 DATE: 21 September 1992 TIME: 1:45 pm Weather: Clear TEMP RANGE: 75° EST. % of COMPLETION: 84% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+,-) : On Schedule WORK IN PROGRESS: PRESENT AT SITE: Dormer Finish Roger Bresnahan Installation two stucco finish installers John Savasta OBSERVATIONS: 1 . The five dormers on the North face of the building have been surfaced with the synthetic cement system and are near complete. The dormer facing Essex Street. have the synthetic cement system applied to the face of the dormer only. 2 . The synthetic cement cornice has been installed on the North face of the building. 3 . The exterior plywood at the dormers was being removed from the Essex Street facade. 4 . The dormers on the North facade are showing dimples on the side facing Essex Street. DIRECTIVES : None ITEMS TO VERIFY: None INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED: 1 . The transition between the old metal cornice and the new synthetic cornice needs to be resolved. 2 . Synthetic cement finish system colors. ATTACHMENTS: None REPORTED BY: cc: Roger Bresnahan John Savasta'� Salem Building Department f CSS Architects 61 LIII__}Ipj V DEill. CS5 Architects Incorporated Corporate Place 128 ARCHITECT'S Audubon Road, Building 2 ��� 2 �� p,g} + � FIELD Post Office Bos 1460 - REPORT Wakerield,Massachusetts 01880 (617)245-8400 RtG.l l C1T�(1C C ;: 4 edaaT PROJECT: THE ENDICOTT CENTER, SALEM FIELD REPORT NO. : 4 CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROD. NO. : 706 DATE: 23 October 1992 TIME: 4 : 00 pm Weather: Clear TEMP RANGE: 550 EST. % of COMPLETION: 860 CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, -) : On Schedule WORK IN PROGRESS : PRESENT AT SITE: Granite Veneer Two Granite Installers Installation John Savasta OBSERVATIONS : 1 . The roof dormers were complete ant the cornice at the roof mansard was installed at West facade and portions of the South facade. 2 . The preformed synthetic cement belt course and the column capitals and bases were installed on the East and West facade. 3 . Granite installation was 85% complete at the South facade and the East facade was underway. 4 . The granite color of the South facade is a mixture of warm and cool tones. 5. The granite installer grouted the joint at the granite and metal window intersection on the South facade of the building. DIRECTIVES : 1. The grout must be removed at the joints where the granite returns into the metal windows. The joint must be caulked with sealant. 2 . The granite manufacturer should inspect the color of the granite and respond to the color gradation. INFORMATION OR ACTION REOUIRED: None. ATTACHMENTS : None REPORTED BY: cc: Roger Bresnahan John Savasta Salem Building Department: CSS Architects ARERJONA ENGINEERING INC. STRUCTURAL DESIGN • INVESTIGATION • RENOVATION • RESTORATION ONE MOUNT VERNON StREET P.O. BOX 215 (617)729-6188 WINCHESTER, MA01890 May 24 , 1991 , Roger F. Bresnahan " cI Bresnahan Construction, Inc. 161 Cabot Street Beverly, MA 01915 ,r x vn Co n Re: Endicott Place, Salem, MA n`G � Dear Roger: This letter will summarize items you expressed concern alvout `'= during our meeting at the subject building on May 21, 1991. We verified and notified you by phone that the upper levels, floors 2 thru 6 are designed for office occupancy with regards to Live Load requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Any occupancy having less stringent load requirements would also be acceptable..- i.e. residential or classroom loading. The cracks 'that' have occurred ,in the floor slabs of the upper levels are related to shrinkage stresses and are not the result of any deficiencies in the' supporting members. The new foundations have been installed in accordance with the permit drawings prepared by this office. The rusting of steel members that has occurred is superficial only and has no affect on the strength of the steel. The exterior walls have been designed.to be tied back in accordance with the details on drawings prepared by this office. Due to the termination of services, we never completed site observations of the upper .levels to verify if tie backs were properly installed. We have not reviewed any reports from other consultants regarding the building structure and cannot offer any comments at this time. We would be pleased to provide further -services regarding the structure at Endicott Place. Very truly yours, �)Av Q 7319A1 Alan A. Vitukevich, P.E.Vice President BR (Up of batem, Alaaacbmgettg Public Propertp Mepartment A�C/ry�ryg�pN Nuilbing Mepartment One Oalem Oreen 745-9595 QCxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 11, 1990 Mr. Kirk Roth Bank of New England P.O. Box 2197 Boston, MA. 02106-2197 RE: 234 Essex St./100 Washington St. (Endicott Center) , Salem, MA. Dear Mr. Roth: As the result of an inspection of the above referenced property on �k October 9, 1990, the following findings were noted. \� 1. Exterior sheating is pulling away from walls. \ / 2. Staging around building, top three sections are not secured �pV� to the building. �1" 3. All new poured concrete floors are cracking in approximate same locations. If I may be of further assistance with this matter, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, n ,� tea-cam,/�'. 'James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector Cftp of 6aiem, fflaggub gettg a+l ino i3ubtic iropertp Department �nmaor' Jguilbing Mepartment (One batem Oreen 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 11, 1990 Mr. William Munroe Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Mr. Munroe: As a result of an inspection of 234 Essex St./100 Washington St. (Endicott Center) , the following violations were noted. 1. A main ductile iron pipe projecting from the foundation was open and a sewer gas smell was noted. The pipe must be plugged. 2. A main rain leader or sewer line was open which also must be plugged. Sincerely, John L. Leclerc Plumbing and Gas Inspector Citp of *a1 m, ,+las!5aCbU5Ptt5 \H / girr Department �OraDquartrrs -FSKafaprtte *trrrt < �&alrnt, fili.01970 O° N �r Joseph F. Sullivan Chief Ln U V October 9, 1990 Mr. William H. Munroe Inspector- of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, Ma 01970 Gear Mr. Munroe: As the result of an inspection of the Endicott Center property at #100 Washington Street this date, the following was noted: 1. The fire alarm system appears to be working with the exception of the zone for the sprinkler system which is not in service. The fire alarm system is to be monitored by American Alarm and Communication, Inc., a central station monitoring company from Arlington. A test of the system was conducted, indicating that the internal system was operating satisfactorily, but no signal was received by the central station provider. This problem was being investigated by the property manager at the time of the inspection. _ Q 2. The sprinkler system is not fully completed and is thus not in service. The water supply to the system is shut at the main �\ valve. The use of a fire department in the event of a fire in this building would prove futile. Full sprinkler protection of p� this property, as required by law, cannot be achieved without l\� serious work being performed on the system. Signed, i\ Robert W. Turner, Fire Marshal 100WASH1;10/09/1990 �RecuaFa' Tlertriral Department oCl 'U J �7 " Paul M.Cut& ` . CITY (Ug Elerlririan 44 `1lafatntte St_ $alem, Mass. 01970 ,'area (!lobe 617 715-6300 October 15 , 1990 TO : William H . Munroe , Inspector of Buildings FROM: Paul M. Tuttle , City Electrician SUBJECT : 100 Washington Street ( Endicott Plaza ) An electrical inspection was made on October 9 , 1990 by my assist- ant John Giardi at the above address . The moisture problems in the cellar area has caused corrosive dam- age to the electric service at this location . It is the recommendation of the inspector that an in-depth inspection be made by a licensed e- lectrician . As you know, the electrical permit for this service was temporary for only 90 days , the 90 days has been exceeded . No action has been taken to fully repair and secure this building properly . This condition is in direct violation of the Massachusetts Electric Code , it allows its electrical equipment to be exposed to atmosphere con- ditions (.high moisture) . This could cause failure of electrical protec- tion devices . If corrective steps are not taken within the next thirty days , I will have no choice but to terminate the electric service in the in- terest of public safety. If I can be of any futher assistance , please feel free to call me . �, Paul M . Tuttle , City Electrician PMT/m Citp of harem, ,laggacbUattg Public Propertp Mepartment �3uilbing Mepartment One 6atem Oreen 745-9595 GCxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 11, 1990 Inspection_ Report RE: 234 Essex St./100 Washington St. (Endicott Center),Salem, MA. On October 9, 1990 at approximately 10:00 a.m., this department met with Mr. Kirk Roth representing the Bank of New England regarding the above referenced property. Present from the City of Salem were William Munroe, Building Inspector; Captain Robert Turner, Fire Prevention; John Leclerc, Plumbing & Gas Inspector; John Giardi, Electrical Inspector; and James Santo, Assistant Building Inspector. At that time, we did a walk-thru inspection of the property. Each depart- ment noted what they found wrong and briefly discussed the findings with Mr. Roth (notes attached) . Sincerely, f James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE I I I I I I OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER name,INSTRUCTIONS Print your name,address and 21P Code In the apace below. • • Complete items 1,2,3,and 4 on the � reverse. U.SMAIL • Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. PENALTY FOR PRIVATE • Endorse article "Return Receipt USE, $300 Requested"adjacent to number. RETURN Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. TO William H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salon, hW 01970 • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return recei t fee will rovide ou the name of the erson delivered to and the date of deliver . For ad itiona ees t e o owing services are avai able. onsult postmaster for ees and check boxes' or additional servicels)requested. 1. XXShow to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery (Extra charge) (Extra charge) 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number Kirk Roth, Asst Vice President P 268 692 050 Asset Management Unit Type of Service: Pertinax Properties ❑ Registered ❑ Insured P.O. Box 2197 Certified ❑ COD Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt Boston, M4 02106-2197 for Merchandise Always obtain signature of addressee RE: 234 Essex St., Salem or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 5. Signature — Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if X requested andfee paid) 6. Signature — Agent X 7. Date of Delivery PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 rU.S.G.P.O.1989-238-815 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, 1� CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see heat) -1. If you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand It to your rural carder. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of ` the article,date,detach and retain the receipt,and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt,write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card,Form 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space per- mits.Otherwise,affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. i 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee,or to an authorized agent of the addressee,endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. If return receipt is requested,check the applicable blocks in item i of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it ityou rdake Inquiry. oU.S.c.RO.1989-234-555 P 268 692 080 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) kirk Roth Ass't Vice Pres. ��t�i0"Properties, Inc. o P.O.,State and ZIP Code P.O. Box 2197 Boston 02106 e Postage S Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered N' Return Receipt showing to whom. Date.and Address of Delivery d j TOTAL Postage and Fees 5 C Q Postmark or Date E RE: 234 Essex St., Salem 0 LL N ` a r eftp of *alem, f am5acbm5emg l d r= Public Propertp ;Department �An,Ne 3guilbing Department One balem Green 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 22, 1990 Kirk F. Roth, Assistant Vice President Asset Management Unit Pertinax Properties, Inc. MA PR 02AMG P.O. Box 2197 Boston, MA 02106-2197 RE: Endicott Center, 234,Essex_St. , Salem Dear Mr.Roth: The following is to reaffirm the concerns of the City of Salem Inspection Department that were expressed at our October 16, 1990 meeting which was held in my office at One Salem Green. 1 , The water in the basement pit not only poses a problem in itself, but is also affecting the electric system. _ 2. The fact that the electric system is temporary and that the ninety (90) days allowed for temporary systems has long expired. 3. The Fire Marshal 's concern that there is not full sprinkler protection of the property as required by law. 4. The concern 's of the Plumbing Inspector regarding unplugged pipes that are adding to the water problem and also allowing sewer gas to enter the building. 5. The Building Department is concerned with the senerflex wall system on the exterior of the building (manufacturer's specifications state it should not remain unprotected for more that three (3) months) , we are also concerned with the fact it is unattached to the building in places. The top three sections of the staging are not secured to the building. The severe cracking of the new concrete floors. In -addition, the staging permit and the building permit have expired and the bond terminates at the end of November. page two October 22, 1990 Kirk F. Roth, Assistant Vice President Pertinax Properties, Inc. RE: Endicott Center, 234 Essex St. , Salem As per our arrangement, the staging will be removed and some method of protecting the senerflex system from being a hazard to the public safety will be provided no later than Friday, November 16, 1990. The electric system will be addressed or terminated by Friday, November 16, 1990. All other concerns of the various City Departments will be addressed no later than November 16, 1990. Should this timetable not be met, I will have no recourse but to declare the property a hazard to the public safety and welfare and enforce the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, specifically CMR 780, Section 123, Unsafe Structures I must advise you that violations of the State Building Code are punishable by a fine of not more than One Thousand dollars ($1 ,000) a day or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both,for each violation, each day during which any portion of a violation continues constitutes a separate offense. This office, as well as all other offices involved, is available to assist in any way we can to help resolve this matter. Please send confirmation of our meeting scheduled for Monday, November 19, 1990 at 2:00 p.m. , in my office at One Salem Green. �Sincerely, William H. Munroe Inspector of Buildings WHM:bms cc: Mayor Harrington City Solicitor Fire Chief Fire Marshal City Electrician Plumbing Inspector PER,TINAX f � ' PROPERTIES, INC. { �' December 4, 1990 Neil J. Harrington, Mayor City of Salem, City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Harrington: Please allow this letter to serve as confirmation that I have-received_ approval—to remove the scaffolding from the exterior of the "Kerr"� building. In conjunction with this effort, the window openings;open brick- voids and the dormers will be covered with painted (�") plywood. The plywood will be painted to match or coordinate with the surrounding building materials so as to not be offensive. Thanks for your patience!! 7141ty-1 Kirk F. Roth Assistant Vice President CC: G'!lr]-S Davies I rt� 61•Aa `"(dl 1{INe,V1'I del 0 k/neil/sb DEC 1 .1 199D CITY OF SALEM MAYOR'S OFFICE MA BO S230RE MA PB 02AMG 28 State Street One Essex Drive Boston,Massachusetts Peabody,Massachusetts 02109 01960 CUP of *arem., AagoacbUatto AM[ic Propertp Department �D 1 Nui[Ding Mepartment (One Salem 745-9595 ext. t. 38 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 11, 1990 Inspection_Report RE: 234 Essex St./100 WashingtonSt1 (Endicott Center) , Salemp-;A- On October 9, 1990 at approximately 10:00 a.m., this department met with Mr. Kirk Roth representing the Bank of New England regarding the above referenced property. Present from the City of Salem were William Munroe, Building Inspector; Captain Robert Turner, Fire Prevention; John LeClerc, Plumbing & Gas Inspector; John Giardi, Electrical Inspector; and James Santo, Assistant Building Inspector. At that time, we did a walk-thru inspection of the property. Each depart- ment noted what they found wrong and briefly discussed the findings with Mr. Roth (notes attached) . 1' Sincerely, James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector °N Citp of 6alem, 0ag;ncbm5etto Public Propertp Mcpartment �pMlry6 Nuilbing Mcpartment One balem Oreen 745-9595 CXt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 11, 1990 Mr. William Munroe Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 Dear Mr. Munroe: Asla result of an inspection of ,234�Esse St:/100 Washington St,,(Ehdicott Center),l the following violations were noted. 1. A main ductile iron pipe projecting from the foundation was open and a sewer gas smell was noted. The pipe must be plugged. 2. A main rain leader or sewer line was open which also must be plugged. Sincerely, John L. Leclerc Plumbing and Gas Inspector CItp of 6aiem, Alaoncbugettg Pubic Property Mepartment Nuilbing Mepartment One balem Oreen 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 11, 1990 Mr. Kirk Roth Bank of New England P.O. Box 2197 Boston, MA. 02106-2197 RE: 234 Essex St./100 Washington-St. t(Endicott_.Center)_,_Ejalem, MA. Dear Mr. Roth: As the result of an inspection of the above referenced property on October 9, 1990, the following findings were noted. 1. Exterior sheating is pulling away fmn walls. 2. Staging around building, top three sections are not secured to the building. 3. All new poured concrete floors are cracking in approximate same locations. If I may be of further assistance with this matter, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, /' James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector 4 . PADf ,F'.C. TO :F1^6930gy1 195=.06.-0 12: 4b-G F.0-_,'08: • I 1I9 QUINN & SA-VICY, P.C. 222 ECVEX STREET SALF-M. NZ1 S,,.CIIUSETTS 01970 WILLIAM J. T INII (6U W J L LI nx P. ]V I V N F+i'R(JOB)941-330A RICHARD E. SAVOY PETER R. MERRY RICHARD W. STIr FORD aCOT? M. f.,ROVRR M.SRC P. FREY June 3, 1.993 Mr. Robert A. Ledoux, Esquire Ledoux, Whipple and King O 49 Federal Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: 234 Essex Street, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Bob: • I represent Endicott Center Realty Trust, the owners of the building at 234 Essex Street, Salem, Massachusetts. ( formerly known as the Kerr Building) The owner has recently received a commitment to finance completion of the building, however there are some issues regarding zoning that must be resolved. I have enclosed for your review a copy of the 1987 decision of the Board of Appeals grantingVariances for 234 Essex Street as well as for the adjacent building at 90 Washington Street. I have also enclosed copies of contemporaneous separate decisions of the Planning Board for each of 234 Essex Street and 90 Washington Street. The decisions of the two Boards clearly indicate that the former owners intended to develop each building as a distinct component of a larger project. The Board of Appeals decision clearly separates the variances that relate to each property. Further, the Planning Board actually issued separate decisions for each property. The original plan was to add 'two stories to the building at 234 Esser Street and to use the building for commercial purposes , With respect to 90 Washington Street, the intent was to raze the existing building and construct a 6 story building to house 69 residential units . As part of the latter phase, the plans provided for the construction of a facility consisting of 69 parking spaces . As you know, the two floors were added to the building at 234 Essex Street in accordance with the variances for r FFOf-I ':T, IIITI i_di II HI 1,;-5 P00Y,F.C. Ti i617SS70891 1 DD71 C6•-17=. F'.0 • June 3 , 1993 Page 2 that property, but the building was never put into service. No action was taken to exercise the rights with respect to 90 Washington Street. The present owner' now plans to construct 31 apartment units in the building at 234 Essex Street, a use which is allowed in the B75 Zoning district. The plan complies with all of the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including that for parking. My clients recently approached the Building Inspector to discuss the issuance of a building ' permit, however, the inspector expressed some concern relating to the variances granted for 90 Washington Street. It is my opinion that the variances for the two properties are distinct, that the rights granted with respect to 234 Essex ,Street were properly exercised and that the variances relating to 90 Washington Street were abandoned. Accordingly, there should be no impediment to the issuance of a building permit at 234 Essex Street, for users permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. ! I would appreciate if if you could review this matter at your earliest convenience and. advise me of the best course of action to satisfy the concerns of the Building Lnspector. Very truly yours', Scott M. Grovez; , Enclosures cc : Roger F. Bresnahan Richard D. Anderson SMG/nb LTR/LED/GROVERI CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROTECT NUMBER: PROJECT TITLE: The Endicott Center PROJECTION LOCATION: 100 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 NAME OF BUILDING: The Endicott Building NATURE OF PROTECT: Alterations performed on existing six (6) story building. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE I, 6oho smej&-S REGISTRATION NO: -,;55-7 - ' BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY i�AT NAVE c PREPARED DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, C%WLTRATIONS r= AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING: c� Cp ENTIRE PROTECT ✓ ARCHITECTURAL S'PR rn vt o FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL m cn o FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROTECT AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE SUCH PLANS COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE-CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING . PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2. 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted f^r building permit, and approval•for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code required constrcution components requiring controlled materials or c-)ns. wctior. specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listel in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO TETE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. SI -n SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME BEFORE THIS ! DAYMV, OF O 0� �Cc��m ali 7/9S` 1 / uJu& J140JIL145 11 UEC 30 2 s9 Ph '81 (�Tt OfttlPm, ttsstttliuse#ts FILEIf �Kntrb of �ppml CITY CLCf:r c5 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT10N 'GROUP,r INC. FOR A VARIANCE AT 234 ESSEX ST. (B-5) ( A hearing on this petition ,was held December 2, 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, 'Fleming, Luzinski and Strout: Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices ofllthe hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting variances from density m requirements established by Table III , Section VI as follows: N 1 . As toan existing building located at Washington St. and 234 Essex St. in a B-5 'zone and known as the "Kerr Building" ; - co a. maximum lot coverage; b. minimum width of side yard; cwn c. floor, area ratio 2. As to the proposed new building; located at 90 Washington St. and also in a ,B-5; zone; a. minimum ,lot area per dwelling unit; b. maximum ,lot coverage; o c. minimum width of side yard, o • d. maximum height of building (feet) ; o e. maximum height of building (number of stories) f. floor area ratio 0 3. Petitioners' are also requesting a Variance from 'minimum parking requirements' for ;sixty nine' (69) residential units, The Variance which has beenlr'equeste,d may be granted upon a finding'of the " r�. Board that: „ ; a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect, the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affectin€ other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b b. literal enforcement of the provisions of xhe Zoning Ordinance would invol • substantial hardship; financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c, desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON'-'THE PETITION OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACTION GROUP, INC: FOR A VARIANCE AT 234 ESSEX ST. , SALEM page two Hox 9403PC146 The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the, plans, makes the following findings of facti 1 . The building is located, in the B-5 area; i is 2. Petitioners plans provide for sixty-nine (69) parking spaces in surface and underground, parking; 3. It is impractical to maintain the entire existing structure and provide on site parking due to the close proximity at the train tunnel which runs under Washington Street; 4 . Construction as shown on the plans will retain and add to the current retail activity and stimulate small businessess; 5. This project will provide for new business to locate in Salem and the-efore create jobs; 6. This project will substantially increase the tax revenue on the property; and 7. There was community support and petitions presented in favor. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes, as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect this building but do not affect the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief reqeusted can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and, without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of 'the district or the purpose ofithe Ordinance. Therefore, the .Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0,� to grant the Variance requested under the following terms and conditionsi 1 . Petitioner must include in the Condominium Documents the provisions for the Condominium Association to purchase from the City of Salem a minimum of thirty-five (35.) parking spaces at any municipal facility 2. Petitioners are to work closely with the Salem City Planner so that 1 he will approve the final plans for the street scape at the rear and the side of the building other than Washington and Essex Sts. side; r 3. Mall area as indicated by plans are to be opened to the public so as to assure access from Washington St. to the public parking lot; 4. The City will not, now or ever, be responsible for rubbish and trash removal; DECISION ON THE PETITION OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACTION GROUP, INC. FOR VARIANCES AT 234 ESSEX ST. , SALEM page three BOOB 9403FC147 5. If the City chooses to put a second tier for parking on the Sewall Street parking lot, the developer will work with the City Planner to arrange an agreement for the developer to help defray the cost to the City of Salem; 6. Petitioner will provide sixty-nine (69) on site parking spaces in accordance with the plans submitted to the Board; 7 . Petitioner will provide in the Condominium Documents for the parking spaces to be non-severable from residential unit ownership; 8. Petitioner will comply with requirements of the Salem Fire Department; 9. Petitioner will obtain and comply with the requirements of all building permits; 10. Construction shall be in accordance with the plans submitted to the Board; and 11 . The building shall be numbered in accordance with regulations. VARIANCES GRANTED !I James M. Fleming, Esq. . Vice Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 8OVAND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS�AFTER THE DATE OF FILII;G OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. PU S4NF TO .'SSS. CENER41. LAWS. CHAPTER 808, SECTION 11. THE VARIANCE OR SPEEI4L F;?'•IT CHA'iT EU HEREIN. SHALL NJl 1A'E EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE L)ECISIF N. BEAF'..'C. THE "RT- OF THE CI1Y CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED %'I0 NJ AI'PEAL HAS 9CE74 - c) uR THAT IF SUCH AN APPEA! HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT HAS CEEN DIS'ISSEI- ,:F. RVORUED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED ur:DER IH: 6-:.L UI THE 0'..: ' OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL Dare FEB 251988 $ Thereby certify that 20 days hove expired„ from the dot,, 1;as.ir.ctrurl:ent wo; C :;._ .' end That ;,,to A,nPEAI 1rJ5 Lean fi'e;f in tiTis )ffice. True Copy kTTE:T: I"�� s J� DATE:.. .......__ APPEAL CASE NO.. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TO THE BOAAD OF'APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that theYwo are the Owers of a certain parcel of land located at Nd34 Pssgr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District B-5'. and said Parcel is affected by Section(s),I Table, and, VIS C , ,; of the Salem Zoning Ordinance MMSYA*X8A0tIW4-T. . . . £XZka Jbt_-Y 9 vawY4d4ygr rnMwr ' Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IE A.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. TD BE SUBMITTED i The Application forPermit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: DIRECT APPEAL The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the term of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to ' . approve the application fee permit .to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Coda would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be, granted without substantially deco- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: SEE ATT, HED '' y S� tl° Owner. Urban Development.Action. Group Addres/.5.Pirates Lane, Gloucester, MA Telephone. (617) 531-4,14*7. 31.4147. Petitioner . Same. . . . . . . . . . . . . Data P%ff; Telephone. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . By 00764ff/ utnham� et ner 'firs copies of the application-ao/t be tiled with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check. for advortiaing in the must of $ . • • • • • • • • . four weeks prior'te the emoting of the Board of Appeals. Cock payable to The Evening Nae. The Petitioner is presently the owner of the land and buildings known -,as the„ ,."Kerr-Foodland” buildings at the corner of qt . Essex and Washington- Streets . Prior to ownership of the parcel , Petitioner requested . and obtained from the Board of Appeal c (decision filed July 8 , 1986 and extended for six (6) months in July, 1987 ) a variance from the minimum parking requirements in a B-5 district . For reasons beyond the control of Petitioner , the prior owners of the parcel were unable to convey title until December , 1986 . Due to the delay, resulting changes in financing, and updated construction cost estimates , Petitioner determined that rehabilitation of the "Foodland Building" was not feasible , such that a new structure had to be designed for that portion of the site . The ! previous plan submitted to the Board was based upon • maintenance of the existing structure and as a result provision of on-site parking under the existing structure was not possible due to design problems and cost . 'The proposed plan, on the other hand, is based upon renovation of the Kerr Building (with riew construction of two additional floors ) , and demolition and construction of a new building on the "Foodland" site. Demolition of the "Foodland" portion of the existing structure and construction of a new building reduces the design problems and costs of on-site parking so that the new building can provide ( for on-site parking.' Since the new plan results in two buildings and financing and condominium plans are based upon two buildings , the parcel is divided into two 'lots and density and parking variances are requested for each building as follows: 1 A. KERR BUILDING VARIANCES • I . Maximum Lot Coverage (Table III Item 4 ) The proposed building plan is a combination of renovation and new construction of two additional stories . The building covers 91% of the lot ( 10 , 624 SF building footprint on 11 , 613 SF lot) . The ordinance allows 100% lot coverage for existing buildings but only 50% lot coverage for new construction of r; non-residential ,uses . Since the ordinance is silent as to which is applicable in the instance of renovation of an existing building with new construction of two additional floors , a 3 variance is required. 2 . Minimum Width of Side Yard (Table III Item 5) The existing building abuts the lot lines and thus a variance from the five ( 5) foot side yard regulation is required. (Although no side yard is required for existing building, since It ._ the ordinance is silent as to new construction of additional floors , a variance is , requested) . 3 . Floor Area Ratio (Table III Item 10) The floor area of the building is 45 , 688 SF and the lot area is 11, 613 SF resulting in a ratio of 4 to 1 . Since a ratio of 3 to 1 is called for by the ordinance a variance is required. (Again, although a ratio of 6 to 1 is provided for existing buildings , this variance is requested because of new construction of two additional floors . The Kerr Building will not contain residential dwelling units so that parking spaces are not required. 2 a�rsTr�r•� rP� 1 B . NEW BUILDING VARIANCES 1 . Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling Unit (Table III Item 2) The new structure will contain 69 residential dwelling units and thus require a lot 'containing 34 , 500 SF. ( 500 SF per dwelling unit) . Since the lot contains 17 , 580 SF, a variance is necessary. (Note : The ground floor of the proposed structure will cover 5 , 974 SF on the 17 , 580 SF lot which meets the 50% lot coverage requirement of Table III , Item 4 ) . 2 . , Minimum Width of Side Yard (Table III Item 5) The new structure will abut side lines and thus a, variance is required, from the 5 ' requirement for new construction. 3 . Maximum Height of Building (Table III Items 6 & 7 ) The new structure will be 81 feet high and consist of 8 stories and thus .variances are necessary for each of these height regulations . 4 . Floor Area Ratio (Table III Item 10) The structure will contain 94 , 685 SF of floor area (excluding 21 , 500 SF of subsurface automobile parking) on a lot area of 17 , 580 SF resulting in a ratio of 5 . 4 to 1 and thus exceeding the 3 to 1 ratio required by the ordinance so that a variance is necessary. 5 . Parking (Section VIZ C) The building will contain 69 on-site parking spaces (surface and subsurface) to accomodate 69 residential units . Since the ordinance requires 1 . 5 spaces per unit (103 . 5 spaces) a variance is required. 3 Due to the configuration of the multiple lots of this • parcel , the pro!Cimity of buildings to the lot lines , the nature of the existing buildings and proximity to the B & M train tunnel , special conditions and circumstances exist which affect the land and buildings so that literal enforcement of the ordinance provisions would involve substantial financial hardship to the Petitioner. The relief requested may be granted without detriment to the public good and in keeping with the intent and purpose of the ordinance and the City Master Plan in that the development provides housing and commercial space which will promote economic vitality and activity in the B-5 downtown district . i f a 4 Qwk�ar- prdVONISa UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ��_ESScr Him —.— •`----"PENANWF 7TR PRIVMTE USE, 8300 Print your name, address and ZIP Code here Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 �t I11o1 till 111111111111 11 i l i l i lil 11 ii l SENDER: I also wish to receive the • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. • Complet'vitems 3,and 4a&b. following services (for an extra • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): return this card to you. • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address does not permit. • Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt Fee will provide you the signature of the person delivers to and the data of delivery. Consult postmaster for fee. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number Convenient Cupboard P 009 226 22G 234 Essex St. 4b. Service Type Salem, MA 01970 ❑ Registered ❑ Insured ertified ❑ COD Express MailIReturn Receipt for ec er h i 7. Date of Div ry ? 'Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested IV , and fee is paid) 6. Signature (Agent) PS Form 3811, November 1990 *U.S.GPO:1991-167-M DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT Tity of *a1Pm . Massar4usjetts Publie t1ropertp Department e +wilding Department One Salem Green 508-745-9595 Ext. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer March 31, 1993 Convenient Cupboard 234 Essex St. Salem, MA 01970 RE: 234 Essex St. Dear Sir: It has been brought to my attention that you are in violation of the City of Salem Sign Ordinance relative to signs at the above referenced property. The illegal signs I am referring to are the chalkboards that are installed on the corner of Essex & Washington Sts . at the entrance. You are hereby notified to contact the Planning Dept. within (7) days of receipt of this notice to apply for the proper permits. Failure to comply will result in the necessary legal action being taken. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me. I thank you in advance for your prompt and courteous cooperation in this matter. 7V Sincerely, Leo E. Tremblay f Zoning Enforcement Officer Inspector of Buildings LET:bms cc: Planning Director Councillor Harvey, Ward 2 Certified Mail #P 009 227 220 CERTIFICATE ISSUED DATE 1/28/92 `'. CITY OF SALEM SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 BUILDING PERMIT--CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DATE DeC. 19, 19 91 PERMIT NO. 554-91 .I. APPLICANT R. Bresnahan ADDRESS 161 Cabot St.. Beaerlv.MAa' 1030 T (NO.) ISTRE[TI Fry ICONIP'S IICENSEI OF 0 PERMIT TO A�TI� I_1 STORY CX.MMLI2CIAL DWELLRING UNITS ..... .III ..PPO.&w. l YO. (PROPOSED US[1 AT (LOCATION) Z34 ESSEX ST. WAM 2 ZOsin[T B-5 fN�.l UlR[[TI BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREETI - (CROSS SIPEETI LOT -n SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE. BUILDING IS TO BE FT. WIDE P. FT. LONG By FT. IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION !JI R (TYPE) AEMARKS% FIRST( FLOOR ALTFRATION.S HF.A'l1 M & iWCOMITIWINC PUBLIC 4C)ILL'TS ETkORICAL SERVICE LIGHTS, CEILING & SPRIIIUU" SSYSTFM EXISTING. NEW COUNTERS, FLOMUI G, MINIMAL PARTITIONS CALL FOR PERMIT TO O0WPY 745-9595 AREA OR I Al o VOLUME C BIC SOUfqE FEETF Elfwa tolam tam Convenient rd sols'.IprWs�Tsf.lonlsl.Ipr[IbC{IpT:'Ilp.".I pf'11p1716111slllplTlp OWNER ent Cur TO BE POSTED ON PREp�O re L., rvi e, SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CONDITION S/BEICERTIFiCATE ADDRESS ° :` , Af CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUNNING DEPARTMENT WILLIAM E.LUSTER ONE SALEM GREEN City Planner 01970 a (508)745-9595,EXT.311 FAX(508)744-5918 December 17, 1991 Mr . William Munroe Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr . Munroe: In regard to'Eidicott�Centel;please be advised that the Salem Redevelopment Ailthority.,has-approved the temporary use of plywood to cover the exposed columns on the building located on the corner of Essex and Washington Street . The plywood is a temporary measure and will be replaced with granite slabs, as called for in the approved plans, once the granite material has been cut and delivered. The owners of the building are estimating an April delivery date. Thank you for your consideration in this matter . ISincerely, W r/ e City Planner jm\kl\munroe cc: D. Harris C-3 L C) a -h L^ Lr-) fV X - � a � ' o CITY OF SALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF HEALTH 9 North Street RORERT E. BLENKHORN Salem, Massachusetts 01970 HEALTH AGENT 508-741-1800 November 15, 1991 Convenient Cupboard Inc. 34 Moreland Street Somerville , MA 02145 Attention: Mr. Michael Baxter: Re: Proposed Food Establishment, "Convenient Cupboard", 234 Essex Street, Salem, 117 Dear Mr. Baxter: Based on the plan review held at this office on October 21, 1991 regarding the proposed food establishment at 234 Essex Street, the Health Department issues the following comments in accordance with the State Sanitary Code, Chapter X "Minimum Sanitation Standards for Food Establishments", 105 CMR 590.000: - Walls, floors and ceilings in food preparation, food storage warewashing areas, and all walk-in refrigerators, dressing rooms, toilet rooms shall be constructed of smooth non-absorbent easily cleanable surfaces. An example is stainless steel, "glassboard" or equivalent material. - All equipment and utensils to be constructed of stainless steel or an equivalent smooth easily cleanable material. ' Equipment to be installed with adequate space surrounding it to allow for regular, effective cleaning. - Accessible wall-hung handwashing sink(s) with liquid soap and paper towel dispensers to be installed in each food preparation and warewashing area. Sinks used for food preparation or for warewashing shall not be used for washing of hands or for any other purpose. , - In new establishments'at least one (1) service sink or curbed cleaning facility with a floor drain shall be provided and used for the cleaning of mops or similar cleaning tools and for the disposal of mopwater. Handwashing or warewashing facilities or food preparation sinks shall not be used for this purpose under any circumstances. continued oSALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT 9 North Street Salem, MA 01970 Convenient- Cupboard Inc. . Page 2 of 2 November 15, 1991 Re : Proposed Food Establishment , "Convenient Cupboard", 234 Essex Street, Salem, MA — The installation of exposed horizontal utility service lines and pipes on the. floor is prohibited. Exposed utility service lines and pipes shall be install— ed in a. way that does not obstruct or prevent cleaning of the walls , floors and ceilings. All construction must meet the code, requirements set forth by the Building, Fire , and Electrical Departments as well as the Health Department. — Any changes of this proposed food establishment requires Board of Health approval. The Health Department appreciates your cooperation in this matter. Contact this office to arrange compliance inspections throughout the construction process. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office. FOR THE BOARD OF HEALTH REPLY TO ROBERT E. BLENKHORN, C.H.O. WILLIAM T. BURKE, III, R.S. HEALTH AGENT SENIOR SANITARIAN REB/m cc: Building Department Electrical Department Fire Prevention Licensing.Department �vg�s o UP of *stem, Aaggacbu8ett5 P 3 � n DATE FILED l T Type: New Expiration Date v ❑ Renewal, no change Number 96-189 ❑ Renewal with chance In conformity with the provisions of Chapter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended, the undersigned hereby declare(s) that a business is conducted under the title of: at�234 � SE>C S i �S�C fz/I A14-- O197y type of business �� /✓�'c�.4�- Mia;�Ny1'F' by the following named person(s): (Include corporate name and title if corporate officer) Full Name Residence SI.D N�y Slfr2v 37E SfI�E �)R�iir �as� tii/� of � Si� .atures ------------ ------- a - -� ------------ - - -�----j----------------- ----------------------------------------------------- on 19�the above named person(s) personally appeared before me and made an oath that/thee regoiing statement is true. ----------------------------------------------------- T Y CLERK Notary Public (seal) Date Commission Expires Tdentification Presented State Tax I.D. # S.S. # (if available) In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chapter 110, Section 5, of Mass. General Laws, business certificates shall be in effect for four(4) years from the date of issue and shall be renewed each four years thereafter. A statement under oath must be filed with the town clerk upon discontinuing, retiring, or withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be fumished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violations are subject to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each month during which such violation continues. BUILDING CITY OF SALEM SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT _ ._., DATE - 19 �- PERMIT NO. y APPLICANT `�'s��'=1 ADDRESS ' (NO) (STREET) (CONTRS LICENSE) CITY STATE_ZIP CODE TEL.NO. -_. "- -+-T r, n� - NUMBER OF _ PERMITTO - '--tsNl -� � O STORY—' P -')'- ^M1_''. DWELLING UNITS (PIPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. (PROPOSED USE) _SEX ._..TRtEi j p ZONING T,,_�; .., AT(LOCATION) ') - - — F DISTRICT (NO.) 1 (STREET) _.---' - BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION ,*IH = LOT == BLOCK SIOZES'Q FT BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BY FT.LONG BV FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: r,i,.L"J .:oL -.C .'i_l(7l '`.� Wi�it ' L.E?Li IN G.' AREA OR _%e '.�� . i at.' ) — PERMIT VOLUME ESTIMATED COST$ FEE $ (CUBIC/SQUARE FEET) OWNER 1-)`ID:CQET CE" TTP ll,.l ,13 ` ), M1 T BUILDING DEPT. ADDRESS k. WASH I h.,o TON i = BY ". J THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF,EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY,ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION,STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAYBE OBTAINED FROM THEDEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF THREE CALL INSPECTIONSAPPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS CARD KEPT WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. WHERE A PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS. ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND 2.PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. MEMBERS(READY TO LATH). NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 3.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS ea.e- rn le,rr& Se�v 3?vrr /�- 2 2 cc e s M fn Tb �o 2� t✓�� Yak � U — BOARD OF HEALT ( GAS INSPECTION APPROVALS F DEPF-.INSFECWGAPPAOVALS Ll V f OTHER CITY ENGINEER 2 p i v' WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS I SPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARD INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHONE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. AS NOTED ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION.