7 ENGLISH STREET - BUILDING JACKET 7 ENGLISH STREET
t4
ELIZABETH M. RENNARD CITY OF SALEM JERALD A. PARISELLA
City Solicitor KIMBERLEY L. DRISCOLL, MAYOR Assistant City Solicitor
93 Washington Street One School Street
Salem, MA 01970 Beverly, MA 01915
Tel:978.619.5631 LEGAL DEPARTMENT Tel:978.921.1990
Fax: 978.744.1279 93 WASHINGTON STREET Fax:978.921.4553
Email: brennard0salemmcom SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 Email:jap@alexanderfemino.com
July 6, 2009
Augusto Saccoccio
Kathryn Ciccarelli
7 English Street
Unit 1
Salem, MA 01970
RE: 7 English Street, Salem, MA 01970
Dear Augusto and Kathryn:
On June 2; 2009, the matter of Twardowski v. Carro and the City of Salem Board of
Appeals was before the Essex Superior Court. Neither Mr. Carro nor his representative appeared
for the hearing because Mr. Carro contends that he did not have standing to file a petition for a
variance relative to parking at 7 English Street and, as such, does not have to defend the case.
Since you and other condominium owners did not move to intervene in this case,the
Judge ordered that the matter be remanded to the City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals (see
attached Order).
In accordance with the Order, if you and the other condominium owners wish to maintain
the parking as allowed by the "Zoning Board of Appeals decision, you must file your own petition
for a variance because Mr. Carro will be filing his own petition for the Board to rescind the
variance. Attached is an application that has to be filed before July 29, 2009 so the matter may
be placed on the agenda for the next Zoning Board of Appeals meeting scheduled on August 19,
2009.
Very truly yours,
Elizabeth Rennard
City Solicitor
erljmr
Enclosure
t
nNtDDy,I4.. CITY OF SALEMt MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET. 3RD FLOOR
�( SALEM. MA55ACHUSETTS 01970
- TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595
FAX 978-740-9846 2009 SEP - I P 1: 30
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL
MAYOR hLL i�
LII'( isi_ f,.
September 1, 2009
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of Michael and Heather Ukstins requesting Variances to allow
four (4) existing stacked parking spaces to remain on the property
located at 7 English Street [R-21.
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on August 19, 2009 pursuant to Mass.
General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The public hearing was closed on August 19, 2009 with
the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Robin Stein, Bonnie Belair,
Elizabeth Debski, Rebecca Curran, and Jimmy Tsitsinos.
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the following section of the Salem Zoning
Ordinance: § 7-3 Off-street parking; uncovered, not included in structure.
Statements of fact:
1. In a petition dated January 24, 2008, Paul Carro requested relief from
requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow a curb cut. Upon review by
the Building Commissioner, it was determined that further relief was needed for
four parking spaces to remain on the property and for the addition of two new
parking spaces. At its meeting on February 13, 2008, the Board opened and
closed a public hearing on this matter.
2. The plan submitted to accompany the petition was titled "Plot Plan of Land, 7
English Street, Salem, Property of Paul Carro,"dated December 13, 2005, and
prepared by North Shore Survey Corporation.
3. In a decision dated March 3, 2008, the Board of Appeals denied variances for a
curb cut, and also denied relief for the two new parking spaces, which were
shown on the plan along the West side of the property, abutting property
belonging to Amy Conrad.
4. In the same decision, dated March 3, 2008, the Board also granted relief from
dimensional requirements of§ 7-3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the
four spaces at the rear of the property to remain. This decision was appealed by
abutter Helen Twardowski (9 English Street). Paul Carro did not respond to the
appeal because he claimed he did not own 7 English Street at the time and
therefore did not have standing to petition the Board of Appeals for the variance.
2
5. On June 2, 2009, Essex Superior Court issued an Order and Judgment remanding
the matter to the Board of Appeals to address defendant Paul Carro's standing to
file a petition for a variance relative to 7 English Street, and to entertain a further
petition from the current owners of the property for a variance from minimum
stall and setback dimension.
5. In a petition dated July 28, 2009, Michael and Heather Ukstins,current owners of
7 English Street, Unit 2, requested relief from parking stall length and design to
allow the four parking spaces at the rear of the property to remain.
7. At its meeting on August 19, 2009, the Board of Appeals opened and closed the
public hearing regarding the Ukstins' petition. Attorney John Keilty presented the
petition on behalf of the Ukstins.
8. Attorney William Delaney, representing direct abutter Helen Twardowski (9
English Street) spoke at the hearing against the petition.
The Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following separate findings:
1. Order and Judgment from Essex Superior Court:
a. Because Paul Carro did not own 7 English Street at the time he petitioned
the Board of Appeals for relief from off-street parking requirements to
allow the four spaces at the rear of the property to remain, he did not have
standing to receive the Variances requested.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five(5) in favor
(Stein, Debski, Curran, Tsitsinos and Belair) and none(0) opposed, to rescind its
decision to grant Variances issued on February 13, 2008 from minimum stall and
setback requirements for the four rear parking spaces at 7 English Street, and to annul
said Variances.
2. Request for Variances from parking stall length and design to allow the four
existing spaces to remain at the rear of 7 English Street:
a. The variances requested are not contrary to the public interest and,owing
to special conditions. a literal enforcement of the provisions of the City of
Salem Zoning Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.
b. A literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would require
reducing the number of spaces accommodated on site, and would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the petitioner and the
neighborhood.
3
c. There are circumstances relating to the layout and access to this parking
area which especially affect the property but do not affect generally the
zoning district in which the property is located.
d. For these reasons, desirable relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent or purpose of the ordinance.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
I. To allow the existing four spaces to remain at the rear of the property, the
petitioner may vary the terms of section § 7-3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance,
specifically stall dimensions and the minimum setback from lot lines.
2. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor(Stein,
Debski, Curran, Tsitsinos and Belair) and none(0) opposed, to grant petitioner's request
for variances from off-street parking regulations to allow the existing four spaces to
remain.
The variances granted shall be subject to the following term, condition, and safeguard:
1. Petitioner is the obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to,the Planning Board.
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has
been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
onrywra� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET. 3RD FLOOR
� ( C SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595
rveo�'
FAX: 978-740-9846 1p09 cep _ 1 P l: 30
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL
MAYOR
GI1 Y I:!_
September 1, 2009
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of Michael and Heather Ukstins requesting Variances to allow
four (4) existing stacked parking spaces to remain on the property
located at 7 English Street [R-2].
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on August 19, 2009 pursuant to Mass.
General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The public hearing was closed on August 19, 2009 with
the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Robin Stein, Bonnie Belair,
Elizabeth Debski, Rebecca Curran, and Jimmy Tsitsinos.
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the following section of the Salem Zoning
Ordinance: § 7-3 Off-street parking; uncovered, not included in structure.
Statements of fact:
1. In a petition dated January 24, 2008, Paul Carro requested relief from
requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow a curb cut. Upon review by
the Building Commissioner, it was determined that further relief was needed for
four parking spaces to remain on the property and for the addition of two new
parking spaces. At its meeting on February 13, 2008, the Board opened and
closed a public hearing on this matter.
2. The plan submitted to accompany the petition was titled "Plot Plan of Land, 7
English Street, Salem,Property of Paul Carro," dated December 13, 2005, and
prepared by North Shore Survey Corporation.
3. In a decision dated March 3, 2008, the Board of Appeals denied variances for a
curb cut, and also denied relief for the two new parking spaces, which were
shown on the plan along the West side of the property, abutting property
belonging to Amy Conrad.
4. In the same decision, dated March 3, 2008, the Board also granted relief from
dimensional requirements of§ 7-3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the
four spaces at the rear of the property to remain. This decision was appealed by
abutter Helen Twardowski (9 English Street). Paul Carro did not respond to the
appeal because he claimed he did not own 7 English Street at the time and
therefore did not have standing to petition the Board of Appeals for the variance.
l
2
5. On June 2, 2009, Essex Superior Court issued an Order and Judgment remanding
the matter to the Board of Appeals to address defendant Paul Carro's standing to
file a petition for a variance relative to 7 English Street, and to entertain a further
petition from the current owners of the property for a variance from minimum
stall and setback dimension.
6. In a petition dated July 28, 2009, Michael and Heather Ukstins, current owners of
7 English Street, Unit 2, requested relief from parking stall length and design to
allow the four parking spaces at the rear of the property to remain.
7. At its meeting on August 19, 2009, the Board of Appeals opened and closed the
public hearing regarding the Ukstins' petition. Attorney John Keilty presented the
petition on behalf of the Ukstins.
8. Attorney William Delaney,representing direct abutter Helen Twardowski (9
English Street) spoke at the hearing against the petition.
The Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following separate Endings:
1. Order and Judgment from Essex Superior Court:
a. Because Paul Carro did not own 7 English Street at the time he petitioned
the Board of Appeals for relief from off-street parking requirements to
allow the four spaces at the rear of the property to remain, he did not have
standing to receive the Variances requested.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor
(Stein, Debski, Curran, Tsitsinos and Belair) and none (0) opposed, to rescind its
decision to grant Variances issued on February 13, 2008 from minimum stall and
setback requirements for the four rear parking spaces at 7 English Street, and to annul
said Variances.
2. Request for Variances from parking stall length and design to allow the four
existing spaces to remain at the rear of 7 English Street:
a. The variances requested are not contrary to the public interest and, owing
to special conditions: a literal enforcement of the provisions of the City of
Salem Zoning Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.
b. A literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would require
reducing the number of spaces accommodated on site, and would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the petitioner and the
neighborhood.
3
c. There are circumstances relating to the layout and access to this parking
area which especially affect the property but do not affect generally the
zoning district in which the property is located.
d. For these reasons, desirable relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent or purpose of the ordinance.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
1. To allow the existing four spaces to remain at the rear of the property, the
petitioner may vary the terms of section § 7-3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance,
specifically stall dimensions and the minimum setback from lot lines.
2. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor(Stein,
Debski, Curran, Tsitsinos and Belair) and none(0) opposed, to grant petitioner's request
for variances from off-street parking regulations to allow the existing four spaces to
remain.
The variances granted shall be subject to the following term, condition, and safeguard:
1. Petitioner is the obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board.
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has
been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
1.; t BUILDING DEPARTMENT
$i
120 WASHINGTON STREET,311°FLOOR
TEL. (978) 745-9595
8
FAx(978) 740-9846
KTTvtBERLl~Y DRISCOLL
MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PR.OPERIY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER
June 25, 2009
Augusto Saccoccio
7 Engi,sh Street Unit#1
Salem Ma. 01970
R.E: Zoning Violation
Dear Owner,
This department has been notified that a parking space has been created on the left side of the
property abutting 5 English street. This space was the subject of a Board of Appeals Petition
submitted by the developer,Paul Cantu in February of 08. The Decision of the Board,dated
March 3d,2008, denied the petitioner,s request for the curb cut on English street and the creation
of the space abutting#5 English Street. You are directed to stop parking in this area upon receipt
of this notice. I have enclosed a copy of the Zoning Board,s Decision for your review. If you
have any questions or if I have noti fled the wrong unit:owner, please contact me directly.
Th oras St.PiWrr
Buildingmmissioonner/ Zoning Officer
cc. file, Jason Silva,CouncillorMc,Carthy,Elizabeth Rennard
}
1
CITY OF SALEM,
�cosnnza.� MASSACHUSETTS
�t.
BOARD OF APPEAL
_ r 1 20 WASHINGTON STREET, 3PE) FLOOR
Pt SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS O 1970
''r�' •--;'��Y TELEPHONE. 978 745 9595
�9,rr4 ISE D� Fax. 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL � � rl —� f7 12: 3b
MAYOR
March 3, 2008
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of Paul Carro requesting a Variance for a second curb cut to
allow for two new parking spaces and a Variance from minimum stall
dimensions and minimum setback to allow the existing four spaces to
remain at 7 English Street JR-21.
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on February 13, 2008 pursuant to
Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The public hearing was closed on February 13, 2008
with the following Zoning Board members present: Robin Stein, Bonnie Belair, Elizabeth
Debski, Rebecca Curran, and Richard Dionne.
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the following section of the Salem Zoning
Ordinance: § 7-3 Off-street pinking; uncovered, not included in sn ucture.
Statements of fact:
I. Paul Carro presented the petition for the property he owns at 7 English Street (R-
2).
2. The plan submitted to accompany the petition is entitled "Plot Plan of Land, 7
English Street, Salem, Property of Paul Carro", dated December 131 2005, and
prepared by North Shore Survey Corporation.
3. The existing curb cut is on Gerrish Place (labeled "way" on the plan). This curb
cut provides access to the existing four(4) parking spaces at the rear of the
property. These four(4) spaces do not meet the requirements for stall dimensions
and do not provide for the minimum two (2) foot setback from the side and rear
lot lines.
4. The petitioner is proposing a second curb Cut on English Street. This would
access a second driveway on the left side of the property to park two cars, one
behind the other. The two parking stalls depicted on the plan in this location do
not meet requirements set forth in §7-3 for stall length and the regulations that
parking facilities shall be designed so that each motor vehicle may proceed to and
from the parking space provided for it without requiring the movin,,_ of anv other
vehicle.
d Y
a
5. Letters of support for the requests of the petitioner were submitted by Dawsom
Mertz (7 English Street) and Heather and Michael Ukstins (7 English Street).
6. Two direct abutters spoke at the hearing against the petition including I Men
Twardowski (9 English Street) and Amy Conrad 15 English Street).
The Board of Appeal, atter careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following separate findings for each request:
1. Request for variances from minimum stall dimensions and minimum setback to
allow the existing four spaces to remain
a) The variances requested are not contrary to the public interest and, owing
to special conditions; a literal enforcement of the provisions of the City of
Salem Zoning Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.
b) A literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would require
reducing the number of spaces accommodated on site and, would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the petitioner and the
neighborhood.
c) There are circumstances relating to the layout and access to this parking
area which especially affect the property but do not affect generally the
zoning district in which the property is located in.
d) For these reasons, desirable relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent or purpose of the ordinance.
2. Request for a variance to allow for a second curb cut on English Street to allow
two new parking spaces.
a) The variances requested are contrary to the public interest and special
conditions do not exist that create unnecessary hardship. Not all residents
have driveways; these circumstances are not unusual to the zoning district
the property is located in.
b) After hearing concerns about safety the Board concluded that desirable
relief may not be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
Purpose of the ordinance to allow for a second curb cut.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
ncludinu, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
n 4
}
1. To allow the existing four spaces to remain at the rear of the propert , the
petitioner may vary the terns of section j 7-3) of the Salcnl Zoning O-din:utce,
specifically stall dimensions and the minimum setback from lot lines.
3. The addition of a second curb cut shall not be allowed.
3. fn permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires ccitain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals two votes:
'['here was a vote of five (S) in favor(Stein, Debski, Dionne. Curran, and Belair) and
none(Q) opposed, to grant petitioner's request for variances Isom minimum stall
dimensions and minimum setback to allow the existing four spaces to remain.
There was a vote of three (3) in favor(Debski, Dionne, and Belair) and two (2) opposed
(Stein, Curran) to grant the petitioner's request for a second curb cut on English Street,
therefore as stated above the addition of a second curb cut shall not be allowed by the
decision.
The variances granted shall be subject to the following terms, conditions, and
safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF I HIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH l'IIF I'LANNIN(;130A RD AND DIF CITY"CLERK
Appeal from this clecistell, if any,, shalt be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mas.saciwseus General Laws
Chapter 44A, and shall be filed within 20 days of tiling of this decision in the office of the City Clerk_
Pursuant to the Nlassachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Secdrm 11, the Variance or Special Pernut
granted herein shalt not take effect until a copy of the decision beating the certificate of the City Clerk has
been tiled with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
Certificate No: 779-05 Building Permit No.: 779-05
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
City of Salem
Building Electrical Mechanical Permits
This is to Certify that the CONDOMINIUM located at
---- --- - - -
Dwelling Type
0007 ENGLISH STREETin the CITY OF SALEM
---------------------------- --
Address Town/City Name
IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY
UNIT 1
This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto, and
expires unless sooner suspended or revoked.
Expiration Date
---------------------
.__..-. .. _- .-.
Issued On: Tue Feb 27,2007 -----------------------
------ - -
GeoTMS®2007 Des tauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ------------------ ----- ---- ----- -- ------------
CITY OF SALEM
BUILDING PERMIT
Certificate No: 779-05 Building Permit Ni 779-05
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
City of Salem
Building Electrical Mechanical Permits
This is to Certify that the CONDOMINIUM located at
-----_-------------
Dwelling Type ---------------'--
0007 ENGLISH STREET in the CITY OF SALEM
-- ----------- — — — --- ------------ ---- -------
Address - Town/City Name
IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY
UNIT 2
This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto, and
expires _ _ unless sooner suspended or revoked.
Expiration Date
Issued On: Tue Feb 27,2007 ` V
GeoTMS®2007 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ------------------ - ---------------------------------- ----- ----------
CITY OF SALEM
BUILDING PERMIT
Certificate No: 779-05 Building Permit No.: 779-05
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
City of Salem
Building Electrical Mechanical Permits
This is to Certify that the CONDOMINIUM located at
Dwelling Type
0007 ENGLISH STREET in the yt= CITY OF SALEM
Address Town/City Name
IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY
UNIT 3
i
i
This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto, and
expires . . _ unless sooner suspended or revoked.
Expiration Date
-- --- -----------------
Issued On: Tue Feb 27,2007 - - - ----------------
- - - -- ---------
GeoTMS®2007 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ----- ----------'--- - --'--'------'--------"---------------------------------
----- -------------
CITY OF SALEM
BUILDING PERMIT
0007 ENGLISH STREET 779-05
GIs#: '6217 -__ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
,Map_ —_ .41 CITY OF SALEM
'Block:
Lot: 10181
Permit# _ 779-05 2/REPLACE_, BUILDING PERMIT
Permit# '.779-OS �
'Project# TIJSIJS-2005-0847
Est. Cost: !$75,000._0_0
Pee: 1$750.00
Const Class: PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO:
Use Group: _ 1Contractor. License:
Lot Size(sq ftJ:'2475 .Homeowner as Contractor
----- - — ----
Zoning: R2 Owner: CARRO PAUL J
Units Gained: __-Applicant., Paul Carro
'Units Lost: -
— — --- — ':AT: 0007 ENGLISH STREET
Dig Safe#:
ISSUED ON: 2.1-Mar-2005 AHLNDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 21-Sep-2005
779-05 RENNOVATIONS TO UNIT 1,2,3 TJS
POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET
Electric Gas Plumbing Buildin
Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation:
Service: Meter: Footings:
Though:�fj//rr1 L'�A. .-)nth Rouge: Rough: Foundation: {n'9/
Final/�`fi •✓t�lQ V/Y Final: Fimil: Rongh Fratn (�
V"(ery�+�
Fircpto,e _'hhJn
D.Y.W. Fir G� Health
Insulation
Mehr: Oil:
Final: �� LG
House# Smoke: Jf
1'rca I Y:
Water: Alarm: -
Sewer: Sprinklers:
THIS PERMIT MAYBE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UP VIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS
RULES AND REGULATIONS.
m
Signature:
Fee'1'ype: *^=ma., ,. Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount;
BUILDING 11,"t'.3 IZ LC-005 U01U65 21-Mar-05 1015 $750.00
�L t rT
An F7-vn;
t?
;;llc b r nt;ort i s du.^ °a:,.,♦,,,� ,
1 « , Y45•nlclf SaaI pI #I¢ ; ,J ip
LS 1jxt.35 Call
Geri fOIS'�2005 Des I,uprieri�liundcipal Soluoenc,tne.
CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS CITY OF SALEM, MA
~ lau BOARD OF APPEAL CLERK'S OFFICE
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 200b JAN 20 A 9-- 42
FAX: 978-740-9846
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF PAUL CARRO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 ENGLISH STREET R-2
A hearing on this petition was held January 18 2006 meeting with the following Board
Members were present: Nina Cohen Chairman, Nicholas Helides, Bonnie Belair, Edward
Moriarty and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
At the request of the Petitioner, the Salem Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant leave to
withdraw this petition without prejudice a Variance for a second curb cut for the property
located at 7 English Street R-2.
GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
JANUARYI8, 2006 �'^I
Nina Cohen, Chairman (Scfu-
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein
shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk
that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry
of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted
on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
Plans must be riled and approved by the Inspector before a permit will be granted.
Nod?L� �J� City of Salem Ward_ L
IS PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
HISTORIC DISTRICT? Yes No 8
IF SIDING, HAS ELECTRICAL /
PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Yes_No✓✓✓ Home Phone #
APPLICATION Bus. Phone # 7Y I?-
PERMIT TO RO , REROOF R INSTALL SIDING
Sac ,
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned herebv applies for a permit to build according to the followin specifications:
Owner's name and address rz-a /-, zz-le" i'!
Architect's name
Mechanic's name and address c rJiO/tin� Z o/lor/ .,
Location of building,No 2 Lr 2 Lgn�a ~
What is the purpose of building? w 2 II i
O
Material of building? W O .L7 Asbestos?
If a dwelling,for how many families'- -)--,w I-)
Will the building conform to the requirements of the law? E
Estimaked cost Contra /t,99 Lv.N
Signature of applicant
REMARKS SIGNED UNDER THE
-AZ-e kJ 7� 7) P('1 /�r;) � , PENALTY OF PERJURY.
Ale ut �,�urerZ� r E c[ ,Z-J?
Ward
APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT TO ROOF
REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING
Location 7 ;Lk,3,1 i , � S L
PERMIT GRANTED
Ap ro d
Bulld g inspector
,.I _.,._-c„""lT'�"`g4�Yi�'Nr•°°aq'T'e$+�%+"�fhiFr"s"'*`°a"!*+"T'I�Yr^Tis✓"��� �1�7/'d"w�1�rY(�`"ymdlp¢��`�4E"M1VT�'�`�h5r '. � f+
yJT a'•IL�b� FIELD COPY
CITY OF SALEM BUILDING 0-
SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT
.� V.LIO.TION
4(�
DATE • une 2, 1943PERMIT NO. 7.90-93
APPLICANT .Tanen Rhp.a ADDRESS CA1PLn L
i�Lrt�/y� - �.y���+rT
[NO.) IS1PL(rl (COfML�1�9VIS 011.11(1
REROOPi - - L/Wr"WIJ.YII NUMBEF OF 1YN
PERMIT TO (_) STORY DWELLING UNITS
(111( 01 IMPe OYLMLNTI N0. IPAOPOLED .5f1
AT ILOCATIONI 7 ENGLISH STREET WARD 1 DINING R-2
DISTRICT
IN0.1 If 1P[[TI '
BETWEEN
aeon. AND
n sr.LYIcnoss STREET)
LOT
SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE
BUILDING IS.TO BE PT. WIDE BY FT. LONG BY FT. IN NEIGNT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION
TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION
-
ITrP(1
REMARKS: REROOF
I �
AREA O ESTIMATED COST 1,000.00 PERMIT 20.00
':eIL SO A[ R[li J
aWNER S nlpv
N.^.DAL'S P
ASSISTANIP INSPECTOR OF B ILDINGS
INSPECTION RECORD
ONT[ NOT[ /NOON[!/ - CNITICosms AND NEMANM{ INEI[C TON
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE rHIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
\ ! ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. E3 Age
l ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee
so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
a Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article
� � D. is delivery address different from item 17 O Yes
1 tm
i � If YES,enter delivery address below: CI No
i t��t>LS7 ca�eCO�t 0
/Y1-0 (M? U s. Service Type
i O CertlFled Mall .C I Express Mall
0 Registered ' 0 Retum Recelpt for Merchandise -
(3 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
i 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes -
2. Article Number
(riansler from sar&a 1aW
PS Form 3811,February 2004 Donestic Return Receipt 1o259sa2-ra.ss40
y ,
y ,or<o1T�ge CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 9922 0n613 n1300 13n22 91301
l BUILDING INSPECTOR
T\\ 'a 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
X91—"'WAP SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
1145N'3HI• •3d019AN3 JO.•
UNCLAIMED 9922 13+160 novo on22 900
Augusto Saccoccio
7 Engish Street Unit#1
aPP I Salem Ma. 01970 �( Wo�c®�y ma�yy_�
® Fblu u�
KFiYWN� I a c
°2 72 $ 05.540 lvgs not k4f'r,a �`n / 7/a ll�l
AILED 0321 JUN 25 2009 ; / n�7 (% Jl7X.
MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 01970 &DOW S-E�'Ao�-
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
120 WASHINGTON STREET,3 FLOOR
8 _$ TEL. (978) 745-9595
FAX(978) 740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOL-
MAYOR THOi As ST.PIERRE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER
June 25, 2009
Augusto Saccoccio
7 Engish Street Unit#1
Salem Ma. 01970
R.E: Zoning Violation
Dear Owner,
This department has been notified that a parking space has been created on the left side of the
property abutting 5 English street. This space was the subject of a Board of Appeals Petition
submitted by the developer,Paul Carro in February of 08. The Decision of the Board,dated
March 3`d,2008, denied the petitioner,s request for the curb cut on English street and the creation
of the space abutting#5 English Street. You are directed to stop parking in this area upon receipt
of this notice. I have enclosed a copy of the Zoning Board,s Decision for your review. If you
have any questions or if I have notified the wrong unit owner, please contact me directly.
Tho as St.Pierr
Building Commissioner/Zoning Officer
cc..file, Jason Silva,Councillor Mc,Carthy,Elizabeth Rennard
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
y 120 WASHINGTON STREET. 3RD FLOOR
n
Al �� SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE 976-7459595
>•kME P FAX: 978-740-9846
7nn:
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL lu.� 1";..1{ -Z p 12: 3h
MAYOR
March 3, 2008
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of Paul Carro requesting a Variance for a second curb cut to
allow for two new parking spaces and a Variance from minimum stall
dimensions and minimum setback to allow the existing four spaces to
remain at 7 English Street JR-21.
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on February 13, 2008 pursuant to
Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The public hearing was closed on February 13, 2008
with the following Zoning Board members present: Robin Stein, Bonnie Belair, Elizabeth
Debski, Rebecca Curran, and Richard Dionne.
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the following section of the Salem Zoning
Ordinance: § 7-3 Off-street parking; uncovered, not included in structure.
Statements of fact:
1. Paul Carro presented the petition for the property he owns at 7 English Street (R-
2).
2. The plan submitted to accompany the petition is entitled "Plot Plan of Land, 7
English Street, Salem, Property of Paul Carro", dated December 13, 2005, and
prepared by North Shore Survey Corporation.
3. The existing curb cut is on Gerrish Place (labeled "way" on the plan). This curb
cut provides access to the existing four(4) parking spaces at the rear of the
property. These four(4) spaces do not meet the requirements for stall dimensions
and do not provide for the minimum two (2) foot setback from the side and rear
lot lines.
4. The petitioner is proposing a second curb cut on English Street. This would
access a second driveway on the left side of the property to park two cars, one
behind the other. The two parking stalls depicted on the plan in this location do
not meet requirements set forth in §7-3 for stall length and the regulations that
parking facilities shall be designed so that each motor vehicle may proceed to and
from the parking space provided for it without requiring the moving of any other
vehicle.
5. Letters of support for the requests of the petitioner were submitted by Dawson
Mertz (7 English Street) and Heather and Michael Ukstins (7 English Street).
6. Two direct abutters spoke at the hearing against the petition including Helen
Twardowski (9 English Street) and Amy Conrad (5 English Street).
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following separate rindings for each request:
1. Request for variances from minimum stall dimensions and minimum setback to
allow the existing four spaces to remain
a) The variances requested are not contrary to the public interest and, owing
to special conditions; a literal enforcement of the provisions of the City of
Salem Zoning Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.
b) A literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would require
reducing the number of spaces accommodated on site and, would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the petitioner and the
neighborhood.
c) There are circumstances relating to the layout and access to this parking
area which especially affect the property but do not affect generally the
zoning district in which the property is located in.
d) For these reasons, desirable relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent or purpose of the ordinance.
2. Request for a variance to allow for a second curb cut on English Street to allow
two new parking spaces.
a) The variances requested are contrary to the public interest and special
conditions do not exist that create unnecessary hardship. Not all residents
have driveways; these circumstances are not unusual to the zoning district
the property is located in.
b) After hearing concerns about safety the Board concluded that desirable
relief may not be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
purpose of the ordinance to allow for a second curb cut.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
3
1. To allow the existing four spaces to remain at the rear of the property, the
petitioner may vary the terns of section § 7-3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance,
specifically stall dimensions and the miniroU n setback from lot lines.
2. The addition of a second curb cut shall not be allowed.
3. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals two votes:
There was a vote of five (5) in favor (Stein, Debski, Dionne, Curran, and Belair) and
none (0) opposed, to grant petitioner's request for variances from minimum stall
dimensions and minimum setback to allow the existing four spaces to remain.
There was a vote of three (3) in favor(Debski, Dionne, and Belair) and two (2) opposed
(Stein, Curran) to grant the petitioner's request for a second curb cut on English Street,
therefore as stated above the addition of a second curb cut shall not be allowed by the
decision.
The variances granted shall be subject to the following terms, conditions, and
safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
e-obt ^
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND rli F.CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of[lie City Clerk has
been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
:r
/.; osl r„! CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
1 20 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE 978-7459595
11 rNST a” FAx 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLLt2": :1
a rD I?: 3h
MAYOR
March 3, 3008
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of Paul Carro requesting a Variance for a second curb cut to
allow for two new parking spaces and a Variance from minimum stall
dimensions and minimum setback to allow the existing four spaces to
remain at 7 English Street (R-21.
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on February 13, 2008 pursuant to
Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The public hearing was closed on February 13, 2008
with the following Zoning Board members present: Robin Stein, Bonnie Belair, Elizabeth
Debski, Rebecca Curran, and Richard Dionne.
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the following section of the Salem Zoning
Ordinance: § 7-3 Off-street parking; uncovered, not included in structure.
Statements of fact:
1. Paul Carro presented the petition for the property he owns at 7 English Street (R-
2).
2. The plan submitted to accompany the petition is entitled "Plot Plan of Land, 7
English Street, Salem, Property of Paul Carro", dated December 13, 2005, and
prepared by North Shore Survey Corporation.
3. The existing curb cut is on Gerrish Place (labeled "way" on the plan). This curb
cut provides access to the existing four (4) parking spaces at the rear of the
property. These four(4) spaces do not meet the requirements for stall dimensions
and do not provide for the minimum two (2) foot setback from the side and rear
lot lines.
4. The petitioner is proposing a second curb cut on English Street. This mould
access a second driveway on the lett side of the property to park two cars, one
behind the other. The two parking stalls depicted on the plan In this location do
not meet requirements set forth in §7-3 for stall length and the regulations that
parking facilities shall be designed so that each motor %chicle may proceed to and
from the parking space provided for it without requiring the moving of any other
vehicle.
5. Letters of support for the requests of the petitioner erre submitted by Dawsons
Mertz (7 English Street) and Heather and Michael l kstins (7 English Street).
6. Two direct abutters spoke at the hearing against the petition including Helen
Twardowski (9 English Street) and Amv Conrad (5 English Street).
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following separate findings for each request:
1. Request for variances from minimum stall dimensions and mininwm setback to
allow the existing four spaces to remain
a) The variances requested are not contrary to the public interest and, owing
to special conditions; a literal enforcement of the provisions of the City of
Salem Zoning Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.
b) A literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would require
reducing the number of spaces accommodated on site and, would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the petitioner and the
neighborhood.
c) There are circumstances relating to the layout and access to this parking
area which especially affect the property but do not affect generally the
zoning district in which the property is located in.
d) For these reasons, desirable relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent or purpose of the ordinance.
2. Request for a variance to allow for a second curb cut on English Street to allow
two new parking spaces.
a) The variances requested are contrary to the public interest and special
conditions do not exist that create unnecessary hardship. Not all residents
have driveways; these circumstances are not unusual to the zoning district
the property is located in.
b) After hearing concerns about safety the Board concluded that desirable
relief may not be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
purpose of the ordinance to allow for a second curb cut.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
J '
3
I. To allow the existing four spaces to remain at the rear of the property, the
petitioner may %ary the terms of section j 7-3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance,
specifically stall dimensions and the minimum setback from lot tines.
1 The addition of a second curb cut shall not be allowed.
3. In permitting such change, the Board of appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
In consideration of the above,the Salem Board of Appeals two votes:
There was a vote of five (5) in favor(Stein, Debski, Dionne, Curran, and Belair) and
none(0)opposed, to grant petitioner's request for variances from minimum stall
dimensions and minimum setback to allow the existing four spaces to remain.
There was a vote of three(3) in favor(Debski, Dionne, and Belair) and two (2)opposed
(Stein, Curran) to grant the petitioner's request for a second curb cut on English Street,
therefore as stated above the addition of a second curb cut shall not be allowed by the
decision.
The variances granted shall be subject to the following terms, conditions, and
safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
:Y t'i IPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WI I II THF.PLANNING BOARDA NO 11 IF CITY CI..ERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 44A,and shall be filed within?o days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk-
Pursuant
lerkPursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 111A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision hearing[the certificate of the City Clerk has
been tiled ksith the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
y�` � SS
I � ���k � �oi s
��+s�s����� �ov� $r r+�
.WSP�L7L1F1 �PFlIDR TD A PEASAIT �,EIN� GRANTED
CITY OF SALEM
� o�a„� 1� D ,�
N�� ��`� �
s: � I
,; �'� ; ,
��•� I
Is Property Locawd In Locacion of II
tlu Fliatoric District? Yes_No� Huilding � �vi�r�S` �C�f'
Is PropaAy LoceLd in
-� U»Coneanetlon Arae9 Yas No�
BUILDING PERMIT APPUCATION FOR:
Pertnit to:
(Circle whichever apply) Roof, Reroof, Install Siding, Construct Deck, Shed, Pool,
� Other: _
PLEASE FlLL OUT LEGIBLY&COMPLETELY TO AVOID DELAYS iN PROCESSING
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned hereby applies for a permft to build accord'mg to the foilowing
specifications: -
ownersPi�r,e � ii� [ ��1r�-n I
Address 8� Phone �� ,�Q r� ��e s � �� I�_7� '7�/S� � %,�3
' . � ArchitecYs Name � ' ✓Z �1`���1�l�
Address 8 Ph�e Q�� �,�gZ 7 - 75D l
F� aJ' �r. ��a,y
Mechanics Name �Gt�i��12 --
Address & Phone ( 1
wna�s vw purPoaa ot a,uamg� ��A'N!_ iL�`-/��X� STIn �Z�-�
M.aw�� e�ua�� j,�� n e a�,ra n��r i�w�a �
ww ar�ddq contorm to�aw� �S aeoestos� �o
Esamaad coat vo cny Lice�e r N A s�aa anea r
aa�s I�rwsent `
Lic. /
Signatu of Applicant
• SIGNE UNDER THE PENALTY
OF PERJURY
DESCRIP'T10N OF WORK TO BE DONE
�� �.. ,. �10� �1 f�.l�.�-, , f � � s�v�d� ��e�:
�
J�a ir� �- �tial�a���fi-r,
MAII PERMIT T0:
.`.
„ w �
T'
��I�� -�S �
APPUCATION FOR
PERMIT TO . ' .
�P n�r n c-��YrH S �i9 '
(itnc�'S ��-�-' J�
LOCATION:
� ����,�5�, ��i-Pe �
, �
PERMIT GRA TED '
� '3 /f3 OS 2b
APRF�OV�D � �
� � �_
�
INSPECTOR F BUILDING
� - -- - � � . _ ----�
.�..�..�___._
...--�----------- _ _ _�, _. _.. _ . ... .
_ ,
_ _ _ _
T
.....�...-.� , _ ._ _.r ....,._ .� ,..,_^.,.,._..,.. _... . ...
�
;
_...-� ,. , _ _
, ,
_ , > , .,. , ,
; .
r, .. . ,�.
.
fi. .
� . , \ .,,.. , k,
- . . . . . � .. . . � � ... . . . . . . .. .. � . . . ' . . . ' 1 . � 4 �
. � . . � . � �i.i � . - . . . . . . � . . . . . .. . . . . . �. . . � . .. . . . �. � . . � ... . . . . . . . . . . . � . . � . . .. �� , . .� t �..;..� ._ . . .
. . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . � . . . . . � . . � . . . . . . . . �� . . �. �. .. • 1 �. . • . . . . . . .
. . . . � . � . . . . . .. . .
. . . i.� . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . , .. . � . . � � . . . . . � � � ,i-
. . . . . � . . . . . . . . �, . .' � . . . .. . . . . . . . .� 't h...r�i ..a �` '� .
; ���� �
r 1
; � . �� . . . : :.�: .
� , I QDavid F. Jaquith '-
. . � � � . . � � . . . � . . . � , . . . , � . � _ .:__- � --�- -----1 -� . � . . . .. � . .. . . . . � � . .. . � . . ,, . . � .� �.
. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. �. �...._._ . __ ...�._ � .✓� . . . - . � . . . . : . . :.
. . . � . . . . - . , . ._ ._ -----� . . . . . . . . � � .
� � .� . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. �. . I . . . . ��, - . � ' � , � �1 I � . . � �' . . . � , . . ! . .
` ��
� � �'��. <� � �-;, �
r� � r�
. . . . � . �/'i -� i� � � .
. . 1;�• . � �, . � � . . .. . � + � . . � u � r i �� � . . ' . � ..
- �_ - 1 y , a'
:_ 1 �,
� � �� i t �� -
��
, � : _ ��u�� `, �
; i Q ' , , _� ` �
`� ra �a" ` � ." �
' . � �'� � I_i�/�I�IG w''_.l�.7� � ?'� L� p+ � � . d
• i .� �GL. � � t`o � � � `_
, � �
. ; � fa m ��� �a� � n i
. � . ' � . �� . � I1 � i � _._ I . � . . . ' � f� l.� H (�±� ?i E" - .. . .
_ . . . . . . . � ,. .. . .. � I� , .�— . � � �+.' � N CJ W. F�+a!-s u:% . �. � .
. � . .. ; �{ Z''�-" ( � - I N� � d
. � '�� . . � . . � . . � . . � �i, � �/Gfl�`�I �L . : I . . . . � O � .
. � � . . � � �.. i � . . . ' S'.�.� _ , . . ' � .. , . . . Vl Z . .
i d
� � . . . , . . � � � _ � �d � � ��
i � � � �
� I i i � ��� i
� '
' , , .� _f� a!�-✓Y ,mx�>r�: � � i -
��--���-���, - ��:.,:a+ ,_�-NF,' ~ (
_ ' \/ �' c.: ,,,�.�G�1.Ar_ .
I 4 � �
�M� t�T'�=�---� � � ��. � �
�'..�'.�= � �
D L�
�����I � , � �
! - � sTZ�i�� �;LT�u. � �
_ ��n
; - i ' � N -
� �
� � _ `� � �
. , . . — ��__ _ � o�,
' - ' I ����� � "�° �
; . ' p • - , . ]� .. i O�
� .
� _
;� L I -� � GL- ' �-i111�.'� �-�.GA"�
, ', • , �` -- � _�A` � �,
-�— L-a=� �. �
— ' � � '� �
� �
� � �
. � ��-r�-`-�f �I� ;� C� �„�
, , i i � � ��� �� �� � �
� — — —�.,_ _.. '_.----; , _. — _ � .� -4. ,'� �
. -- -
; � _.`{Z&f�IOJ'u �Xi� �c I �..— ` �
' ' I �G�i"IY'c'.�� {�G+"t�J % ' r � � � j �
, G!. Ll`.��{;�'s':A� Y.: I (_. I � _ ; . �
� � �: ���� _ ��I� '� y
�
. . . . ' �. � .. , � � �iC.�A I�. �_ _Y. . r. �i� . . �.�• � .^,. .
V/
. . . '.� � . .. � . . . . . . . . , . . . . I � _�, ��h�-w*� � `�.' —1 . _� ��' . . �'',. � �� � � . � � .
I i �.-- 'r�--�, _j�,�--����1 . � `� „�
�..__.� i �`1`�+�,�/u�� � v
, �
, �--�>/��-c�, U 1 �,h: I� � �
, ' \., .. :� _ � '\4 ,;'' V ; � �
. r � � � �
�� �.�� __ �
. �
�
,
- � i ��a �.���.� a�z� . _ fl � •� �
._— � � �
. . _ � � � �
, �
,
�� ; �� � �,
. � �.� — �; s �x �,
. . , , , ;
° � r� i r w � � . <:._ � � � ;�
,
� �� i , � `- � 4 � a.
, , .�, � r � � �
_ , __._ ,� �. , , w V M� aa
-.—:-._ _, �
� �
�. �
� ��TZ�':��� �I-'i 0i� �'7�%'r`v"'•-- � �. e .,
-- ---
. G'I-� 3� �L.- - J •r.►
, � � � y�- S'(D'�L�.Z : �� J � y
- � i �
n_
1�"r��L ,
. , � , � � �� �,,,
, , , _� �
I ' '-
, ,
. � � � ; v�
, ■r=-;
: �:.r—. � -
_ . ; n� � � � o
.
��� - - ' �
, � ''� � : � �
_ _ �� �
�
, - o�
,
.
, , �_ .
� _
' Drewing Number
: , ,
: ���'--�I�."� �L.�''� '�,-�1--� ��i�r � Ti�ir� , '
Y
//r/� �[_�-�� �M'I�.�s.�� � �
. . � . . � �. . . . . � . . . . ' : �- � . . . .. '�_iQ/����. ��,l��11 ' I r � ).ey�l .. . .. . .. . . � ' � . ... . i � ..
��. .. . . ��' \}�"
� � . , . . . .. . . . � . �. . � .. . . . . � . . � . � .. . .. . . . j •
,� . � � . : . � . . �. . . .. . . ' .. .. . .:�. I . .. . . . . . . . . - .. . .. .� , .. . ._ . . .�.�.: .
.. ' e:... . . ... � . . . .. . . . � .:�.� �. .... . �: . . . ..�.. ��. . . . . . '
� .�.�r.y.F....�... ._�.. �..., .� _ '... f
'. ..:�.. �J—r.� ... .��. _ . ........,.. . ,. .J . -_:J
� .._ _ .. .,...�.< ____._ ....
.. __ __. . ....
_. . .r . . . . - . .. .. . . .. .. ._: .. . . ._ I . _ . . . I. , . . . . . . . . . ... .
-PJA l6ittl!lST�K fiL-E� APPROVED BY T44E
JpIS,p=L8,Pp" TD.A_PF.AMIT.I MG GRANTED
CITY OF_SALEM
0���`�5 '� `� Date ` �✓�—
Is Property Located In Location of
the Historic District? Yee No Building o
Is Property Located in
Ow Consemadon Area? Yes No
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR:
Permit to:
(Circle whichever apply) Roof, Reroof, Install Siding, Construct Deck, Sh Pgqool,
Repair/Replace, Other: -f K /7 Construct.
Ifs_r 4�a 1),'
PLEASE FILL OUT LEGIBLY&COMPLETELY TO AVOID DELAYS IN PROCESSING
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned hereby applies for a permit to build according to the following
specifications:
Owner's Name C/ / ��f /i/6
Address & Phone �g ti le rS �� Oh 94 9 q f.)
Architect's Name
Address & Phone 1 1
Mechanics Name
Address & Phone j_ )
What is the purpose of bWlding?
Material of brr4dirrg? III a dwel",for how many Iamffim?
WIN bukkrrg cordorm to law? Asbestos?
Estimated cost city License r N k state Licerm N
ttw lzprov® t
Signs of App scant
SIGNED UNDER THE PENALTY
OF PERJURY
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE 2/
MAIL PERMIT T0:
T '
10. J ��
APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT TO
Dn
LOCATION
PERMIT GRANTED
��a( d ab
A ONFD
7
IR§PECTOR OF BUILDINGS