Loading...
1 DURKIN ROAD - BUILDING JACKET e � lt� 74520 400loP4 - -- -- uµv�a NEW i�ovF- _VdAD Li �- - oF-xI-srftNla -l-fDUSe. _ F � _�LOOR 95LrlD 5. VA-T-] N1-fouS /�DDI'I'IaN _ 1/4,11= 1� -D° T DUWLCF.9. RO 64-7 5Ut-45 141 Zvo$ r4spH�1.� s+ I�xllsuEh II 66) 5/9'1 bIA HU 4 0 #?�oFEI.T G{z,AGe 1GE � WhTEg ,='" �3G.t,TS � l•IASI-4ER� •� 5a-1111�D '�to " 2k 12 , _V I/2" l�Wt3 �� �N --r - � / 2�'/�� M11J• ,� ` T�117G.� i �v.tF1Tr -• ^��� = 2x $ �.x 8c� 1�0" oc. @�c. / a I S6G fi o N VINYI SibfNZ> NNrc� `P FAMY Y I/Z Hv1K�WtzAP ( a c ! p" �vo 1/2° S�Ie('FFIN� r 2x 6 I6" o.e-. 12-il INSWL, . Vim" 1.13 IFINIS+} FL• .G. V4 " }'VI(klGtaD :Ni I ( 111I: I it 11 t2 3'S IK4WL, _ _i 111 1 r2o''10 /1-t.-r, _S Ila- 2)e 4 ¢n¢ ' !7411- t ' -D° I2" bI:A 5otloTuS3� _ S ._ GRp.pE -3 d0 dNE D442 WN RGt I ' SAda;M, H A K4TL Di:Wv1.p p�51GN _ �I, SUITP.PLE :'9>~AW TUNE __ Aub 4 V FLOOR m x _.__.-1"�IST• #'�-- _ �'�� `i 1f'C � � t� _ 1 I7URIG►K {zp S��►�i�_ N1p 61"1 .4`i 110111 S�ar►.E l4� 2-do$ -- - '2,� hIA soNo•ftlra�, ' rf' gcrTvrl ¢a" $F�..ou CaiZADE x At h'IEET C.dDE ) .2.x 12S N cwt N APS 540104 TO GONt,kN Ca"x 36"x ln" ; 3$ Wel uLo. cows,FOd(IN(y v' C(J oc c1 1 c 00 j cv N Cal N O m Cd - 0 �9 n ol K � eo N N 4 x PTo6T I - C oH4z" x l2" x 10° GONG, (o�- O'• (fl' p" ''1�-O `li Oji - -- �orz r-. r-Autilce L�� :#�1111�LG3 . Irl. AN vus bWp-w-IN 2R- 9.A�Walml HA 9^Tr, DI:k1OL r- _Pesil&N 6,17 4-Coq q 8°I I 5UN<= ..14' 2004 W ►N.b°W__scN_��I� I. I.oW e U VALUE ,35 MAX X 6,_g GLASS DOOP6 W/ 12"- 10" 141&N TR ArtSt*','M W1-AboWe2 Cot3�iRl"'1 SGR'�EN -a' _ PNAAd .ASST`( F-PR i tF booms "rY1'E i i t i SEi; #'tzAt 11t�k(� �b _ �vR plM�bt51oN -p i >• . i a N s, r-OtZ 1r. FAUNC r- © 0 Sh, 3M, " A (o�- O'� -- l4 �6 Y--b-'t' -- 17�SlC�N fo 11 4&(-1- at Sol t f: /' � TuKro 14, 2oo8 4.. I2�' Ih��• -soNo'i'�13�; fi�P got'rar� 4a° BE.L-ow CfJj N N 11Of _ '1 (05 f N n cv � lhR� S�}C�ktta` 'ro Gotti'p�IN IGvk:IG; ForlriN&, `O QJS _ CAi _ N \3 atp cq J cv C L 2c N lV I _ 4 x 4 n•r ,posr _ tON GONG, _ &i, 4-(PI 16,1 OE/UG/S r�E'OTNF�S NOTE.- COrt/ST,eI/CT/OK1 C'D., /NC, THIS PLAN IS NOT TO BE USED FOR TITLE INSURANCE �G07_ /O) PURPOSES NOR FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PROPERTY LINES. Q,0T 9) Z G' C � v--D ({ o /26-90 LIN h MOO/t/�Y X40 ' !✓�o�J �OAO - - PLOT PLAN OF LANG IN SALEM, MA I CERTIFY TO THE SALEM WLD/NG /NSPEC7oR _ THAT THE FOUNDA77ON SHOWN HEREON /S LOCATED ON THE ASSESSORS' AIAP /4, LOT /6 PREPARED FOR 6ROUN0 AS SHOWN AND THAT /T CONFORMS TO THE — DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE ZONING-- R-/ C/TY OF SALEM !✓ITH REGARD BACKS AT THE j9R. ELAINE FAUNCE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. y�roFr,,,,� REFERENCES. i�°� DEEM BOOK 5847, PAGE 577 SCALE- - 1 = 20' AUGUST 14, 1995 FLAN ,000K //2, PLAN 65 PLAN.BOOK 55 PLAN /7 9 No. /0 20 40 �O HSA HQNCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES INC. 235 NEWSURY STREET-PANDERS, MA 01923 OA TE PROFS S ONAL LAN SUR!'EYOR CHECKED 8Y.' 5418 -, �mm t' • ato Hu -W/ 4. WATT \� s4-I1F�1.1,> �� 3l4" t'L 'I WvD 2 x 12 r VI 3$ BAIrT . ZA Ill 6i{�,t�. ►/ P V4.1� -�v.FF I Tr � i 2 x 8 :_ : ' p - 00 N I A Tr 1z WaI � _ t2l;T II L. V NYI. (h[NC� I 0 IL p" o FAMY Y Hv1K�WR�p '`� iq _._ 2K 6 r✓_.L6" o.c. _ V y" G Imo!3 _ FIN1444 VL�, Q� Y 3g IISWG. o.c. -Y40 t,_o„ -- tv— IL __ i _.: t�vUS(< �bhltivtJvR Nc e - - RR 61 � ¢6q �18q I �II SU1?'A13l,E _'$�ARt _ �'44N� L4, 2Dv$ 3�4" : �1-•O" 3 _ m - m � _ 12, % %4NA .Soot X1'1 �Nnr F19153U �'1oM�Q �'�} Y W4'i�a 1 _ I -----EJ LJ----- fx 16-rIN �1 i (�ol.ls� a.pbll'tbly 1- bU P'1 _ -TaD -- K�1'� b�WoI.F bir5161� SuNI% «-j -3vvg t � • AA VNWe .35 MACX Q - _ Ava�t,�t3lrt FpR 2 = n SEi #'tzAM t ISG � . r-aR DI m r-A I oN -p _O m � i C9 ex (.EDUSF. �bD1�'IvN - IrOTZ FAUt t6-5 i u o+,lE tiUtzklN RD " - to O" �'_d l4'•6' ro.1-1- ► LooL �ur�t L4, 2av8 uH� NSW _RovF _l.c�,�D - 1141-1 ,7 J OE/UL TNE�S E.` /SO � NOT THIS PLAN IS NOT TO USED FOR TITLE INSURANCE CDr(./STe!/CT/Ork! CD., /.vC, � PURPOSES NOR FOR RECONON STRUCTION OF PROPERTY LINES. COA,'ST, 6107-10.V 9) z u� N �C rl?vFos fp o o �o- h'`- y y 's", Tl oo s /vlODit/�Y X40 ' Wi��� /�0�40 - PLOT PLAN - - OF LAND IN _ SALEM, MA I CERTIFY TO THE SALEM BU/LD/NG INSPECTOR THAT THE FOUNDAT/ON SHO!✓N HEREON IS LOCATED ON THE ASSESSORS` MAP /4, LOT /6 PREPARED FOR _ GROUND AS SHOWN ANO THAT IT CONFORMS TO THE ~ DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE ZONING.- R-/ —� CITY OF SALEM WITH REGARD �S�BACKS AT THE r �R. ELA/NE FAUNCE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. `y�roTr, AEFERENCEi' DEED BOOB: 5847, PAGE 577 SCALE' 1 = 20' AUGUST /4, 1995 " PLAN BOOK 112, PLAN 65 U PLAN BOOK 55, PLAN /7 9 Ao s 7z is __ O Io 20 4o ¢O NAS ,o HS� HANCOCfC SURVEY ASSOCIATES INC. 235 NEWSURY STREET-DANVERS, MA 01923 OA TE PROFS S ONAL LAN SURVEYOR CHECKED 8Y.' 5418 3 Citn of -15ttlem, `4Ettssarl7usetts Q 'Boarb of Aupenl ! ► J . y.- AMENDMENT TO THE DECISION OF MOONEY ROAD & DURKIN ROAD ` DECISION OF THE PETITION OF DEIULIS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION FOR A MODIFICATION OF THE BOARDS DECISION OF MARCH 1992, REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT MOONEY ROAD AND DURKIN ROAD (RC\R1) A hearing on this petition was held Mav 17, 1995 with the following Board members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Albert Hill, Nina Cohen and Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in . the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. A hearing on this petition was originally held on March 15, 1995. Because of an error made by this Board, improper notice, of the prior hearing was given to the neighbors, and a rehearing of the petition was granted. The rehearing of the petition was held on May 17, 1995. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . In March 1993, petitioner was granted a variance by this Board from lot size and frontage with respect to lots which were located, entirely in an RC district (2) partially within an RC district and partially within an R1 district (3) and entirely within an R1 district. 2. The variance granted in March 1993, permitted the petitioner to divide the aforementioned lots in conformance with the requirements of R1 zoning. 3. The conditions which existed at the time of the granting of the previous variance continue to exist at present (vi, the redrawn RC zone effectuated in 1973 or 1974 by the city) and create a hardship upon the petitioner. In its March 1993 decision, the Board incoroporated a document entitled Sable Heights II, Protective Covenants as part of the decision. 5 . it is the Sable Heights II Protective Covenants which the Petitioner now seeks to modify in part as follows: a) Change the minimum living area in the proposed dwelling from 2,000 sq.ft. to 1,500 sq. ft. b) Change minimum footprint of the proposed dwelling from 1,000 sq.ft. to exclusive of garage to 1,000 sq. ft. inclusive of garage. c) Change the minimum roof pitch from 6:i2 to 4 : i2. DECISION OF DEIULIS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON MOONEY ROAD AND DURKIN ROAD (RC\R1) page two d? Delete the paragraph requiring that shutter, if used be wood. 6. in September 1993, the petitioner obtained approvals from the Planning Board and proceeded with construction of the development, installing underground utilities, drainage systems and roads to the binder course at a cost to the petitioner in excess of 5120.000. 7. Of the 1L existing homes in the neighborhood, 8 have living space of less than 1500 sq. ft; 3 are of between 1500-1800 sq. ft. ; .l is between 1800-2000 sq, ft. and 3 are in excess of 2000 sq. ft. of living space. 8. There are 2 other buildable lots in the neighborhood which are not subject to restrictive covenants similar to those set forth in the Sable Heights II Protective Covenants . 9. Petitioner represented that on January 25, 1995, a letter was sent to all neighbors in the Mooney and Durkin Road neighborhood advising them of the Petitioner's intent to seek modification of the Sable Heights II Protective Covenants. A copy of said letter was made a part of the record. 10. in response to said January 25th letter, the Petitioner was contacted by a couple of neighbors who discussed their concerns about the Petitioner's plans. 11. On February 15, 1995, Petitioner again wrote the Mooney and Durkin Road neighbors inviting them to attend a meeting to discuss in detail the pians to seek modification of the Sable Heights II Protective Covenants. 12. On parch 1, 1995, Petitioner held a meeting to discuss their plans with the neighbors. At said meeting, two residents of the neighbor- hood attended and expressed their concerns about the Petitioner's plans. 13. Th Petitioner's land runs along and/or lies beneath high tension electrical wires. 14. The Petitioner represented that to construct a home with a 2000 sq.ft. living area that it would be necessary to build a 2 story home on some of the lots. 15. The requested changes to the protective convents are reasonable and modest of nature. 16. ='r. 5 Mrs . Fierstein, abutters to the property spoke in opposition . 17. Nr. Pygolski, 2 Durkin Road, spoke in opposition. 18. A petition signed by 18 neighbors of the property opposed the petition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. The request relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore. the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 2-3, against the motion to grant, having failed to garner the required four affirmative votes to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is denied. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF DEIULIS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT hOONEY ROAD AND DURKIN ROAD fRC\R11 page three i°ODIFICATION DENIED "Nay 17, 1995 Gary Barrett, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter LOA, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter LOA, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal (Sita of -"ittfem, 'fassurflusetts Boarb of _AFPral CIT'( CF `'( E DECISION ON_ THE PETITION OF DEIULIS BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR VARIANCES AT fMOONEY & DURKINS'RDS-.---jRC/R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held March 10, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; George Ahmed, Francis Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a variance from lot size and frontage to allow construction of a single family dwellings. Property is located in an RC/R-1 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. ?. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3 . Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. A fourteen ( 14) lot subdivision was approved in 1968 and improvements were started. Z. The City re-drew the Zoning Map in 1973 or 1974 changing the RC district. This caused a hardship for the petitioners. 3. The proposed dwellings will not substantially alter the existing character of the neighborhood, and will not be a detrimental use. A. The subdivision will improve a run down area. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEIULIS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR VARIANCES AT MOONEY & DURKIN RDS. SALEM page two 5. There was opposition. 6. Some lots will extend into the 100 foot wetland buffer zone. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem Inspector of Buildings. 5 . All items noted on the document titled Sable Heights II, Protective Covenants are to be attached and made part of this decision and shall be ,lade part of each deed. 6. Petitioner is to meet all requirements of all City Boards and Commissions, including, but not limited to, Conservation Commission, Planning Board and Board of Health. i. No yard debris, waste or fill shall be placed within twenty (20) feet of the sewer easement. +BAREANCE GRANTED arc�t'`10, 1992 ~ Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman ? - Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DEIULIS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR VARIANCES AT MOONEY & DURKIN RDS. , SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South "Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Tit'e. Board of Appeal TC7- v; :r, s N u m _- S 'J SABLE HEIGHTS II Protective Covenants DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. , Inc. , the owner of Sable Heights II subdivision, wishing to protect the integrity and preserve the value of the said subdivision and surrounding homes will establish the following Protective and restrictive covenants: A. USE 1. Lots may only be used for single family homes with attached garage or with garage under where appropriate for a maximum of two cars. 2. No business shall be conducted from the homes. 3. No yard or open area of any lot shall be used for storage of materials or storage or parking of commercial vehicles larger than a pick up truck, trailers, boats, recreational vehicle or equipment. B. BUILDING RESTRICTIONS 1. No building shall be started until plans and specifications have been approved by the Grantor. The design of the homes shall be suited to the lots, shall be compatible with the surrounding homes and shall conform to the following requirements: a. Minimum living area - 2,000 s. f . b. Minimum footprint - 1,000 s. f . exclusive of garage. C. Siding must be wood clapboards 9" to weather, wood shingles 7" maximum to weather, or other wood siding approved by the Grantor. Aluminum or vinyl siding will not be permitted. d. Roofing must be asphalt singles, wood shingles or slate. Minimum roof pitch shall be 6" : 12"; maximum pitch 9" : 12". e. Chimneys must be brick or stone. f. Aluminum storm windows may not be used. g. Window shutters, if used, must be wood. h. Steps must be brick or stone; walks must be concrete, brick or stone and driveway must be concrete or bituminous concrete. i. Any retaining walls that are visible from the street must be of quarried stone with mortared joints. Sable Heights II '93 Protective Covenants C Ty Page 2 C' 2. No building shall be constructed closer to the lot lines than is allowed under the City of Salem zoning regulations in effect at the time. 3. No fence shall be installed without the written approval of the Grantor. All fences shall be of wood construction. 4. No T.V. Antenna or satellite dish shall be installed without written approval of Grantor. C. COMPLETION OF WORK 1. All exterior work including painting, construction of driveway, walk, steps and retaining walls must be completed no later than one year from the date of approval of plans and specifications. 2. All work including landscaping must be completed no later than 18 months from date of approval of plans and specifications. D. ENFORCEMENT OF COVENANTS The above Protective Covenants shall be incorporated in and become part of the Decision of the Board of Appeals in connection with this matter, so that the decision of the Board of Appeals shall read: 'The Special Permit is granted subject to the following conditions. . . ' , and the conditions will then become a part of the formal Decision and enforceable by the City of Salem. " � M• © The Comnxmc,rAlth of I -lassarhusrlts 130aid ul Building Regulations mud StunJ.nJs I c Ht I NII II' \I.II1 NlassaCIIUSC tS State BMR.Code. 7/80 (',.,R. 7,I, IN it SI D Building Permit Application Tu Construct. Repair, RenO rnate r Demolish a Kr.r„'J 1,uu„n (Ate- err Tit o-l''rurrili Dtrtdlin,t: This Section For Official Use Onh' —� j 13wlding Permit NL fiber _ Date ApplicJ: I i I I BLii ding Cana ,. hicpector oI &nldwgs Dale F SECTION I: SITE INFORMA HON --- 1 i L1 P >perti .%ddr•cS: U 1.2 Assessors Map & Parcel Numbers tcrrptcJ irzct \tap !su usher Purrei {anther L la Is Lhis an , s . y.a___—. nu _ _ 1.3 Zoning Inforuaricii: Prope; .; T)in:c.;ions: i e.5 ct>,u:Iwy .:e:Ca<:1,sIry j Fen; Yard _—._ 'i•.:; Y'n,i. Pear Y,ud Hcuun'rd u '.t,i P, ,did i. b m .r Srsgr.:v: (M.G.L c. 40. §541 I I.-, vluo.r lune :mfmmwmr �: LS S tva_= Disposal System: ;.1101c ❑ Pri,ate ❑ zone _ inside F-rnrd '.un.^ Mums-mai ❑ On .i0. dIlj ItI ss •:n ❑ l ---- SECTION 2: PROPERTY i ?.I V.m:c ;I'rinr; Address t'or Sr.r.7/ S!�'_,:,,.ire __. Tcle,rh:;nc SECTION ; OF.S(.RIPii(DN OF PROPOSE-9 YY('RnF Wit-,:k :41 that :rppi ) O Ex is .F, r3!u 417/, ❑ �r sue -Gcupnd zPau sl sl j Alieratiun(s) 13dd� „ii. , I /Uon/ i� G✓1fFf_ /Z_��_ //�_Id—t._z'- C� 7oth�zi ❑, .�,I;cui�; : . css o . e -Number utUn t ,/ ZO/Yr Jfa£ AFrrer'scnpnun t ?rupuseJ Vrn � `h _ 07 - Si'.,J!l:u :r 'IZSTI`F:\TET( :S i r L .::6iir Pu nil 1 c v— 17 Ind lute hu%s tee is .T._ 7 - — —i St an City/fown Applic: r F ri. - Feetal $ ;j eYop , r Ia:at Protect C,.»t (Irem 6) < mwtiplirr x F3. Plumbing i3thzrFees: $ r5, Mechanical (H1':\C) , List: i Nlechanieal (Fire S L Supp cssi,rnl — ('ural AH Fees: S_ S 9, D DD ('heck No. &r Check \mount b rola! Project Cost: 5 Paid in Full ❑ Outstanding Bakin,c Duet - 5�na SECTION 5: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES -r S:* ,, censed Construction Supervisor IC'51.1 —_--- ��Z 3 --- _ - --� ��G�'!� I_t.en.e Number f`.,pt r:wun U.u: Naive al CSI-- Holder —� • �.n. 57 I,,,,I,,,, CSL (',pe l ace below 1 Wd . J/ Uescn holo ' CIII c,ir It redi u i to \i.I NIU Cu. I'l i R Re, trte trd 1&2 Fanuh D,,elhnc S cnauuc SI Nlasonn Onh RC Re'Idenuil len..tine Cu,eiut` Fcicphane \1-S Rc,tdc uual \\ .md S:di if_ SI' Rc,IJenu,d I I . Furl lim nm. \plat i.m r; In.i.ilLw, ii U Hr,iJenlrJ Denethu"u 5.2 Re isttyed III Improvement Cvntractor(IIIC•) �3-SZ 0 2,., LW-6' TurGTlmv _ -- HIC Cam any Name or HIC Rcgutru�Nanx , R'gntrauun Number �5�`/'d�P F, puauan Date Signature Tcleprone 2 SECTION 6: WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT (M.G.L. c. 152. § 25C(6)) Workers Compensation lnsurance affidavit must be completed and submitted with This application. Failure nr pro,ide this affidavit will result in the denial of the Issuance of the building permit. Signed Affidavit Attached? Yes .......... ❑ No .......... ❑ SECTION 7a: OWNER AUTHORIZATION TO BE COMPLETED WHEN OWNER'S AGENT OR CONTRACTOR APPLIES FOR BUILDING PERMIT (�1N.r 7. as Owner of the subject property hereby authorize IL/{dJiT/� G'4Y✓/i rit�i7 �OY✓-�"TCNU70,y to act on my behalf. in :dl matters 7 relative to work thorized by this building permit application. I St nature of Owner SECTION 7b: OWNEW OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DECLARATION t " �O710L 47 , as Owner or Authorized Agent hereby declare that the statements and information on the foregoing application are true and accurate, to the best of my knowledge and behalf. prim & zi e Signature of O r or uthonzed Agent Da e (Si mid under ms and penalties of cru .1 NOTES: _ I. An Owner who obtains a building permit to do his/her own work,or an owner who hires an unreci,tered runts,for (not registered in the Home Improvement Contractor (HIC) Program), will int have access to me arr111mit-ri program or guaranty fund under M.G.L, c. 142A. Other ,important infinmation on the HIC• Program and Construction Supervisor Licensing ICSLI ran he ",on in 780 CN1R Regulations I IO.R6 and 110,RS. rr,pecn�ely ' When ,ubs(antlal work is planned, pn)vtde the information below: Total floors area I Sq. Ft.l (including garage. finished basement/attics. decks ur pureh t l Gross living area r Sy. Ft.) Habitable roam count Number of tireplaces Number of hrdnaan, Number of hathrooms Number of halt/hath, -- l\pe ut heating ,v,tem — _—.— Numher of deck,/ 1),1, FWc of aoohng s"Iem Fn,lose) -- —.Upen l Toed Project Square Footage" may be stib,tituted tt,r "fond Project Cos(- 0 : CITY OF SALEM SL r PUBLIC PROPRERTY DEPART'�1ENT P'awr[u"w' N s 1.4 I.r ri ul. \I.\,i\I .. i i . . 1:\X: 1)7,4-'4.'l$4n Construction Debris Disposal a►t'tidavit (required for all demolition and renovation work) In accordance ith the sixth edition of the State Building Code, 780 Cb1R section 111.5 Debris, and the provisions of MGL c 40, S 54; Building Permit itis issued with the condition that the debris resulting front this work shall he disposed of in a properly licensed waste disposal facility as defined by MGL c I 11, S 150A. The debris will lie transported by: manic of hauler) The debris will be disposed of in (nanm ullaclllly) i�tj�zS �e46 N4 todJrc+�o(lacllily) 6 — \LL'Ilatule Ilt applicant 23 08" _ date - --- Jun 06 07 03: 01p p. I ENERGY CONSERVATION APPLICATION FORM FOR LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION and ADDITIONS r ,7/80 CMR Appendix J ,l / Applic tName: Site Address: I pvt /h PC Appli Address: 2 i-10 4✓ 1;f City/Town: �SQPiyn3 r meUsed S D 7/'.3 / Use Group: Z 4- 1 l o� Date of Application: A icant Phone: /i/7 4� �� Appueaattt Signature: Compliance Path(check one): /w lvrs i`O/7 ❑ Prescriptive Package(Limited to 1-or 2-family wood frame buildings heated with fossil fuels only) Package(A through KK from Table J5.2.1b): Heating Degree Days(HDD65)from Table J52.1a: (For items d.through i.,fill in all values that apply from Table J52-lb:) a. Gross Wall Area sq.ft f. Wall R-value R- b_ Glazing Areal sq_ft g Floor R-value ' R- c. Glazing%(100 x b+a) % h. Basement wall R- d. Glazing U-value U- i. Slab Perimeter R- e. Ceiling R-value R- j_ Heating AFLM ❑ Component Performance: "Manual Trade-Off'(Limited to wood or metal framed buildings only) Climate Zone(from Figure J6.2.2) ❑ Zone 12 ❑ Zone 13 ❑ Zone 14 Attach Trade-Off Worksheet from Appendix J, (and HVAC Trade-Off Worlaheer,if applicable] ❑ M43checkSoftware Attach Compliance Report and Inspection Checklist printouts ❑ Home Energy Rating System Evaluation Attach Home Energy Rating Certificate(HERS rating score must be 83 or higher) ❑ Systems Analysis OR ❑ Renewable Energy Sourcespelr Attach Mass Registered Architect or Engineer Anaivsis ALTERNATIVE FOR ADDITIONS ONLY: :: ed�edh a.Gross Wall+Ceiling Area sq.R. b. Glazing Areal�_sq.ft. a Glazing%(too x b=a) 1 % Q'ADDITION with Glazing% (c.)up to 40% may use 780 CMR Table J1.1.23.1 below: g lis U vai e V acs n airy/� rn afionZ ell' Wall FI o ase 2...t Wall IabP 'meter e h lQip, 1 r�6� 0.3 R- '� R-10 R-10,4 it �"' i Glazing Area maybe either Rough Opening or Unit dimensions. � LX 2 Based on NFRC listing. Applies either to every unit,or to area-weighted average of all units. •2 S� 3 R-30 ceiling insulation may be used in place of R-37 if the insulation achieves the full R-value over the entire ceiling area y ✓ i.e:not compressed over exterior walls,and including airy access openings.) ( P ❑ "SUNROOM" addition(greater than 40% glazing-to-wall and ceiling gross area) Attach"Consumer Information Form"from 780 CMR Appendix B. OfficiaPs Name: Official's Signature: Application Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Date of Approval/Denial: Reason(s)for Denial: (provide additional details as needed on back side) 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE 61065.7 Conservation of Hot Water. Hot water regardless of glazing percentage. shall be conserved in accordance with 780 CMR 6107.2.2 Envelope Requirements. Component 6106.5.7.1. values shall be taken from 780 CMR Table 61065.7.1 Showers. Shower heads shall have 6107.1. a maximum flow rate of 2.5 gallons per minute (gpm) (0.158 L/s) at a pressure of 80 pounds 61073 Building Design by Approved Software. per square inch(psi)(551 kPa)when tested in 6107.3.1 Applicability. This software approach accordance with ASME A 12.18. . 6 1 - may be utilized for all low-rise residential 6106.5.8 Heat Traps. Reserved. buildings covered by 780 CMR 51.00 through 99.00. 6106.5.9 Automatic Controls. Service water- 61073.2 Envelope Requirements.'Todetermine heating systems shall be equipped with automatic c - temperature controls capable of adjustment from compliance with the various wall,roof and floor the lowest to the highest acceptable temperature assemblies, and heating and/or cooling system - settings for the intended use. Temperamre setting efficiencies,a REScheck Version 3.7,Release lb range shall be in accordance with Table tt in or later variant Software analysis must be Chapter ll of ASHRAB HVAC Systems and completed,and the"Your UA"value must be less Applications Handbook, as listed in 780 CMR than or equal to the"Max. UA"value calculated 100.00. by the software. 61073.3 Submittal. The "Compliance Report" 6106.5.10 Shutdown. A separate switch or valve and "Inspection Checklist" of the REScheck shall be provided to permit coming off the energy Program shall be submitted to the local building .. supplied to service water-heating systems. department before a permit is issued. A window 6106.6 Electrical Power and Lighting. schedule including the areas (based on rough 6106.6.1 Electrical Energy Consumption. In opening), and the number of windows,skylights multi-family dwellings,provisions shall be made and other glazed fenestration, shall also be to determine the electrical energy consumed by submitted. each tenant by separately metering.individual 780 CMR 6108 BUILDING DESIGN BY dwelling units. SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF Exception: Motels, hotels, college BUILDINGS UMIZING RENEWABLE dormitories and other transient facilities. ENERGY SOURCES 780 CMR 6107 ENVELOPE DESIGN 6108.1 General. 780 CMR 6108 establishes design COMPLIANCE criteria in terms of total energy use by a residential 6107.1General.Buildings constructed[o780CMR building,including all of its systems. 6107 shall also meet the applicable requirements of 6108.2 Energy Analysis. Conform to the 780 CMR 6106. requirements of the applicable Sections of 780 CMR Chapter 13 of the Sixth Edition,Massachusetts State 6107.2 Building Design by Prescriptive Package. Building Code and with recognition of the amended 6107.2.1 Applicability. This prescriptive efficiency requirements of NAECA,if applicable. package approach is intended for.one- and two-family detached buildings of wood frame or 780 CMR 6109 BUILDING DESIGN BY mass wall construction(concrete,masonry,log). HOME ENERGY RATING Metal frame buildings .are excluded. This Reserved approach may be used for all climate zones, 780 CMR TABLE 6107.1 PRESCRIPTIVE ENVELOPE COMPONENT CRITERIA FOR NEW ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY BUILDINGS' MAXWUM1 MINIMUM - Ceiling or Slab Perimeter Fenestration Exposed Wall Floor Basement R- 11-factor and AFIIE HSPF SEER 11-factor Floors R-Value R-Value all R-Valu Depth R-Value National Appliance Fnergy 0.35 R-38R-19 R-19 R-10 R-10,4 ft Conservation Act(NAECA)of 1987 as amended,minimums or greater as applicable For SI: I foot=304.8 I a. R-values are for insulation materials only,not for overall component. - 786 780 CMR-Seventh Edition 3/23/07 (Effective 4/1/07)