84-86 Derby Street Certified Decision �G -
b
Ct3NDIT,__,
y
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
e
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
%, •-. ,mac.
98 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 C=
DOMINICK PANGALLO TEL:978-619-5685 , Mn
MAYOR
June 6, 2025 �` '
Amended Decision* CO
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals �
0
The petition of HOLLY MAITLAND at 84-86 DERBY STREET (Map 41, Lot 0064) (131 Zoning District
and Derby Street Historic District) for a Special Permit per Section 3.1.2 Special Permit to serve
alcoholic beverages in a restaurant not currently serving alcoholic beverages.
*The original decision was filed with the City Clerk on June 5, 2025. This decision incorrectly
named "Mr. Varela" as "Councilor Varela." Mr. Varela represented himself as an individual
rather than as a City official.
On May 21, 2025, the following members of the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals were present:
Nina Vyedin, Hannah Osthoff, Peter Habib, Christa McGaha, and Stephen Larrick. Ellen Simpson
was absent.
Statements of Fact:
The petition was date-stamped on April 4, 2025.The petitioner sought Zoning Board of Appeals
approval to serve alcoholic beverages in a restaurant not currently serving alcoholic beverages.
1. Ryan Macione owned 84-86 Derby Street.
2. Holly Maitland was the petitioner.
3. 84-86 Derby Street is in the B1 Zoning District and Derby Street Historic District (Map 41,
Lot 0064).
4. The Salem City Council passed an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance on March 13,
2025, allowing a Special Permit for restaurants serving alcohol in the B1 Zoning District
where previously not allowed. Mayor Dominick Pangallo approved the amended Zoning
Ordinance on March 17, 2025.
5. On May 21, 2025, Holly Maitland and Andrew Varela (in attendance representing himself
and not in his capacity as City Councilor),co-owners of Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits,
introduced proposed plans to the Board. Ms. Maitland stated that in March 2024, the
Board approved using 84-86 Derby Street as a distillery with a tasting room. Ms. Maitland
explained that they did not want to restrict their business to purely spirits. Thus, since
October 2024,the property has operated as a full-service restaurant. Ms. Maitland stated
that serving alcohol would allow Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits to provide a complete
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
June 6, 2025
Page 2of6
dining experience, offset operating costs, and continue to provide equitable community
food options.
6. Ms. Maitland stated that operating hours would remain from 11:30 a.m.to 8:30 p.m. and
that a restaurant serving alcohol would be consistent with the neighborhood's character.
Ms. Maitland noted that while 84-86 Derby Street has no off-street parking, it is located
close to walkable locations in Salem. She said she anticipates that most patrons would
walk or bike to Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits, resulting in minimal traffic.
7. Chair Vyedin asked for Maitland Kitchel Farms and Spirits' days of operation.
8. Ms. Maitland stated the business is open from Wednesday to Sunday, and from 11:30
a.m. to 8:30 p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
9. Chair Vyedin asked what changes would occur to the business with the service of alcohol.
10. Ms. Maitland stated that she anticipates minor changes to their business because alcohol
would only be paired with existing meals, like a bottle of wine paired with house-made
pasta. She noted this would bring more dinner patrons because a lack of alcoholic
beverages turns away many potential customers.
11. Chair Vyedin asked if there would be an increase in deliveries to 84-86 Derby Street
because alcohol would be introduced to the business.
12. Mr.Varela stated that most food deliveries are done through independent operators. He
explained that they would have the same vendors and delivery schedule as the
neighboring Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), with one delivery each week between two
(2) distributors. Mr. Varela noted smaller beer and wine distributors regulated by the
Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (ABCC) operate independently from this
schedule.
13. Mr. Varela stated that Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits has outgrown the distillation
space. He noted the business has been moving more towards food and libation-focused
services, like what the neighborhood is looking for.
14. Mr. Habib asked if outdoor seating would be provided.
15. Mr. Varela stated there is no opportunity for outdoor dining other than extending Derby
Street. He noted that Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits has no goal to acquire outdoor
dining because it would be impossible.
16. Mr. Habib asked if the proposed change would provide increased staffing.
17. Mr. Varela responded that there are three (3) staff consisting of himself, Ms. Maitland,
and an additional staff member. He explained that he would like to hire more service and
kitchen staff to relieve himself and Ms. Maitland from working full-time. Mr.Varela stated
that a City Community Development Block Grant loan allowed them to hire economically
.disadvantaged individuals under a certain Area Median Income. He noted his goal would
be to hire three (3) more part-time staff.
18. Mr. Habib stated he appreciates Mr. Varela and Ms. Maitland taking over the property
from the previous retailer. He added allowing beer and liquor sales provides growth
opportunities for the business. Mr. Habib further noted that allowing the sale of beer and
liquor brings Maitland Kitchen and Spirits closer to the character of the existing
commercial neighborhood.
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
June 6, 2025
Page 3 of 6
19. Chair Vyedin asked Mr. Varela to review the Statement of Grounds. Mr. Varela reviewed
the submitted Statement of Grounds:
A. The proposed restaurant with the service of alcohol fills a need for additional business
development in the City of Salem. The restaurant would enhance the current offerings of
Maitland Mountain Farm by providing an attractive restaurant serving craft cocktails.The
restaurant would bring awareness to Maitland Mountain Farm and its mission to educate
its patrons on the importance of sustainable growing practices, providing community
members with access to fresh and healthy foods, improving the local economy and
environment, and increasing the economic resiliency of the community.
B. The proposed restaurant with the service of alcohol would be located in a very walkable
neighborhood near bicycle routes, the Salem Ferry, Pickering Wharf, and South River
Parking Garage. There would also be available on-street parking meters along Derby
Street. Patrons would not be likely to utilize vehicles and would walk or bike to the
establishment. Minimal traffic impacts are expected.
C. Existing utilities and public services would be adequate for the proposed use and
consistent with other uses in the area and the B1 Zoning District.The structure would be
connected to municipal water and sewer services.
D. The proposed establishment would not impact the natural environment or have a
significant effect on existing drainage. Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits plans on
creating an attractive, comfortable, welcoming environment for patrons with some
cosmetic improvements to the building exterior, specifically new signage and a new door.
E. The existing neighborhood would be a commercially active area, so the proposed
establishment would be in harmony with the other nearby business uses and the existing
neighborhood character. Abutting businesses include a pre-existing non-conforming
lodge serving alcohol and food and a pre-existing nonconforming restaurant with service
of alcoholic beverages.
F. The proposed establishment would employ approximately ten (10) residents.
Additionally, the use would have a positive financial impact on the City's local receipts by
generating revenue through various means including but not limited to real estate taxes,
building permit fees, licensing fees, and local meals tax.The proposed use would increase
the commercial tax base which ultimately provides relief to the residential ratepayers.
The use would contribute to the economic growth, development, and revitalization of the
Derby Street neighborhood, thus increasing overall property values.
20. Mr. Larrick asked Mr. Varela if existing patrons come from the Ferry Parking Lot, walk, or
bike to 84-86 Derby Street.
21. Mr. Varela stated that the Ferry Lot is helpful to attract business when open to the public
from November to April. He explained that the neighborhood is very walkable and that
their goal is to engage residents in the immediate area. He explained that Maitland
Kitchen Farm and Spirits has been in touch with the neighboring VFW because some
patrons park in their lot.
22. Chair Vyedin opened up for public comment.
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
June 6, 2025
Page 4of6
23. The Board received four (4) written comments.
24. The following members of the public spoke in favor of the petition during the public
hearing: Flora Tonthat (30 Northey Street), Barbara Kelley (11 Cousin Street), Seth Lajoe
(27 Becket St), Jen Lajoe (27 Beckett Street), Charles Hildebrand (46 English Street),
Miyabe Shields (469 Loring Avenue), Ryan Harriman (24 English Street), and Kelsey
Schmink (86 Derby Street Unit 1).
25. Allison Draper, 86 Derby Street Unit 3, asked what plans were in place to reduce the
volume of patrons waiting to enter Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits. She stated that
music from the business is audible and can be felt in the apartment. Ms. Draper noted
patrons and staff often smoke in front of windows, resulting in smoke entering the
apartment. She added she is looking for a happy balance between restaurant success and
a healthy/quiet living space.
26. Chair Vyedin asked what times staff arrive and leave from 84-86 Derby Street.
27. Mr. Varela stated that staff never arrive before 8:00 a.m. He noted bread deliveries may
arrive at 6:00 a.m. or 7:00 a.m., and the last seating must leave at 10:00 p.m.
28. Chair Vyedin asked how long it takes to close Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits.
29. Mr. Varela stated that closing takes one (1) hour and creates minimal nuisances.
30. Chair Vyedin asked if the business has plans to manage outside patrons.
31. Mr. Varela stated that no employees smoke in front of the business and that Maitland
Kitchen Farms and Spirits is in a highly trafficked pedestrian area. He added that Maitland
Kitchen Farms and Spirits is licensed for entertainment through the Licensing Board.
32. Mr. Varela stated when Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits installed double five-eighths
(5/8) inch green glue sub-acoustic medium as drywall when they moved into 84-86 Derby
Street. Mr. Varela noted they have received no noise-level nuisance calls or health
complaints.
33. Ward Five City Councillor Jeff Cohen stated he does not believe in the B1 Business
Neighborhood concept. Councillor Cohen explained under the B1 District, many
neighborhoods could not have grocers, daycare centers could not operate, and
restaurants could not serve liquor without being grandfathered under the B1 District.
Councillor Cohen added, as an example, that he was against the concept of a B1 District
that eliminates competition when zoned next to an existing bar. He noted that
amendments loosening restrictions in the Zoning Ordinance positively impacted Salem by
spreading out the community in the B1 District.
34. Mr. Varela stated that most vehicle deliveries are made with straight, twenty-one (21)
foot trucks. He added that there are no convenient places to unload deliveries, yet he
would love to talk with distributors blocking crosswalks.
35. Chair Vyedin noted she lived off Derby Street and is familiar with the street's tightness.
36. Mr. Habib stated Derby Street's tightness brings neighborhood quality because the
restaurant has a neighborhood feel. He added that noise and loading issues are normal in
a business district, and the impact of the restaurant would be minimal because it has a
maximum seating of twenty to twenty-five (20-25) patrons. Mr. Habib noted that the
proposed use would enhance what is already existing rather than detract from it.
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
June 6, 2025
Page 5 of 6
37. Mr. Larrick stated that the Board has echoed much of what he was going to say about this
proposal. He noted that the Derby Street neighborhood has overwhelmingly supported
the restaurant. Mr. Larrick explained that most comments were concerning parking,
impacts on residential uses, and noise. Yet this business would be a unique opportunity
to support walkability. He noted he is in full support of the project because the adjacent
VFW has outdoor music, the restaurant would close early, and higher margins would
support Maitland Kitchen Farms and Spirits' continued existence.
38. Ms. McGaha stated she lives within walking distance of Maitland Kitchen Farms and
Spirits. Ms. McGaha noted it fits within the character of the Derby Neighborhood. She
added she understands some input yet believes the location is a good fit for the
restaurant.
39. Chair Vyedin added that elected officials in the City Council voted to extend and change
the B1 Zoning District to support establishments serving alcohol. She noted there was
little indication from the public showing 84-86 Derby Street is not a great candidate for
the Special Permit.
40. Ms. Osthoff motioned to approve the petition.
Based on the above statements of fact and findings, the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals voted
five (5) in favor, (Nina Vyedin (Chair), Hannah Osthoff, Peter Habib, Christa McGaha, and
Stephen Larrick) and zero (0) opposed, to grant Holly Maitland at 84-86 Derby Street (Map 41,
Lot 0064) (131 Zoning District and Derby Street Historic District) a Special Permit per Section 3.1.2
Special Permit to serve alcoholic beverages in a restaurant not currently serving alcoholic
beverages.
Standard Conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved
by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be
strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
7. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained.
8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any city board or commission having jurisdiction
including, but not limited to, the Planning Board.
9. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall
display said number so as to be visible from the street.
10. Unless this Decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted does not
empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the structure(s) located
on the subject property to an extent of more than fifty percent (50%) of its floor area or
more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement cost at the time of destruction. If the
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
June 6, 2025
Page 6of6
structure is demolished by any means to an extent of more than fifty percent(50%) of its
replacement cost or more than fifty percent (50%) of its floor area at the time of
destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of the
Ordinance.
11. All construction shall be done per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved
by this Board. Any modification to the plans and dimensions must be approved by the
Board of Appeals unless such changes are deemed a minor field change.by the Building
Commissioner in consultation with the Chair of the Board of Appeals.
12. Petitioner shall schedule Assessing Department inspections of the property, at least
annually, prior to project completion and a final inspection upon project completion.
Xn- a V it l iV
Nina Vyedin, hair
Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office
of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing
the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
Date JUL 01 2025
1 hereby certify OW 20 days Iwe
wed fro���the date this instrument
was mcairo edl„and that NO APPEAL
has:bow filbd in the" affira.
A True,
ATTE.,-UMO TY Cu.LE KS,fterr+; Mass.