16 Loring Avenue Grounds for Relief STATEMENT OF GROUNDS FOR VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR 16-18 LORING AVENUE
INTRODUCTION
This Victorian building was constructed in 1894. Sometime after the Great Salem Fire of 1914,
large amounts of soils fill from the area of the fire were transported to this site. A 6-bay
concrete garage with a concrete slab roof and concrete side walls were constructed at the rear
of the property, along what is now Charles Street, and the soils fill was then added on top of the
garage and to fill in the lot along the side walls in order to raise the grade of the back yard,
approximately 32 feet, to approximately the grade of the structure. This garage, the concrete
retaining walls and the filled back yard existed when the applicant purchased the property in
1962 and remains today.
The applicant and her deceased husband, Walter B. Power, III raised their family on the
property, and applicant Sandra Power has lived there ever since.
After acquiring the property, considerable repair has been needed to maintain the integrity of
both the garage and the retaining walls. Periodic water drainage problems necessitated the
installation of drainage above the garage to control the flow of water and extend the life of the
basin. Water leakage into the garage required repairs in 2015 at a cost of over$40,000, with
more repairs expected in the near future. And engineers were hired to reinforce and support
the walls around the property, which is an ongoing process that must be revisiting from time to
time.
The condition of the soils and retaining walls at the property create a hardship to the applicant,
economic and otherwise, and cause the applicant to incur substantial additional expense to
control water drainage that are unique, and not generally common to or suffered by other
properties in the neighborhood. Because these circumstances are unique to this property, and
it is in the interest of the City and the neighborhood that this property be maintained and its
drainage problems be controlled, the granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the
neighborhood and will not derogate from the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
10/19/1978 Decision
By prior Decision of this Board dated Oct. 19, 1976 the Power family was granted a Variance to
add a fifth apartment to the structure. Now, in 2024, the family seeks approval to add a 61h
apartment that can be accommodated within the existing structure with legally compliant on-
site parking with 9 parking spaces.
On May 10, 2022 the Board did actually approve Decision for the same relief sought here, but
the variance contained therein expired by law after 1 year, on or about May 9, 2022 because
the applicant did not begin construction or seek and extension. It is now too late for an
extension, so the applicant is filing this new petition seeking the same variance and special
permit granted in 2022. There have been no changes to the structure or site in the meantime.
The only change from the plans approved in 2022 is that the applicant will add sprinkler and fire
alarm systems throughout the structure,the outdoor 3-story stairway is no longer legally
required, and that has been eliminated from the design, and is replaced by two second=story
outdoor decks that extend the same 8-foot distance towards the rear of the property.
GROUNDS FOR VARIANCE
The Shape and Topography of the Parcel
This parcel is about twice as large as others in the neighborhood, and "fronts" on two
public streets, Loring Avenue and Charles Street. The structure located on the high spot of the
property and the land slopes back to the rear. The parcel is broadest along Loring Avenue and
narrows towards the rear of the property. The rear of the property is at least
15 feet above the grade of Charles Street, and contains an unusual underground concrete
5-bay concrete garage structure that makes access to the site from Charles Street, whether to
aid in construction or otherwise, impossible.
These are circumstances unique to the property, and not to the other properties in the
neighborhood and constitute a hardship to the applicant, financial and otherwise. For reasons
stated above, the granting of this relief can be granted without detriment to the neighborhood,
and without derogation from the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
Preservation of the Existing Historically Significant Structure
Unusual existing buildings that are structurally sound, have remaining value and are not
well suited to conforming use (here, the conforming uses would be 1- or 2-family uses) are
sufficient, apart from all other considerations, to establish uniqueness of the property to
support the granting of a variance. Johnson v. Bd. of Appeals of Wareham, 360 Mass. 872, 873
(1972).
This structure is a very large 3-story wood clad Victorian-style dwelling containing about
25 rooms, which was constructed circa 1894 according to the signage provided by
Historic Salem, Inc. (see copy attached). It's existence and maintenance are important
elements of the residential and historic character of the neighborhood.
The structure was originally constructed and used as a duplex residence, with two front
entrances, a 2-story townhome on each side, and maid's quarters on the third level above each.
SOIL & RETAINING WALL CONDITIONS
This Victorian building was constructed in 1894. Sometime after the Great Salem Fire of 1914,
large amounts of soils fill from the area of the fire were transported to this site. A 6-bay
concrete garage with a concrete slab roof and concrete side walls were constructed at the rear
of the property, along what is now Charles Street, and the soils fill was then added on top of the
garage and to fill in the lot along the side walls in order to raise the grade of the back yard,
approximately 32 feet, to approximately the grade of the structure. This garage, the concrete
retaining walls and the filled back yard existed when the applicant purchased the property in
1962 and remains today.
The applicant and her deceased husband, Walter B. Power, III raised their family on the
property, and applicant Sandra Power has lived there ever since.
After acquiring the property, considerable repair has been needed to maintain the integrity of
both the garage and the retaining walls. Periodic water drainage problems necessitated the
installation of drainage above the garage to control the flow of water and extend the life of the
basin. Water leakage into the garage required repairs in 2015 at a cost of over $40,000, with
more repairs expected in the near future. And engineers were hired to reinforce and support
the walls around the property, which is an ongoing process that must be revisiting from time to
time.
The condition of the soils and retaining walls at the property create a hardship to the applicant,
economic and otherwise, and cause the applicant to incur substantial additional expense to
control water drainage that are unique, and not generally common to or suffered by other
properties in the neighborhood. Because these circumstances are unique to this property, and
it is in the interest of the City and the neighborhood that this property be maintained and its
drainage problems be controlled, the granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the
neighborhood, and will not derogate from the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
GROUNDS FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
Approving the petition will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use and that any adverse effects of the proposed use wilt not outweigh its beneficial impacts to the
City and the neighborhood because:
1. Social, economic and community needs are served because the City needs additional
housing units in safe and code-compliant structures, and this proposal will improve
petitioner's financial ability to make structural maintenance and improvements now
and in the future.
2. Traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading, are well served by the design and
legally compliant number of parking spaces as shown on the ZBA Plan.
3. Public utilities and public services already exist and are adequate to serve the property
as proposed.
4. As there wilt be no substantial exterior changes to the structure, and no increase in its
footprint,there will be no additional surface water run-off and negative impacts on
drainage,
5. The historic design and exterior materials are being maintained, so there should be no
negative impact on the residential and historic character of the neighborhood.
6. There wilt be a positive financial impact on the City tax base and employment because
adding a unit wilt increase the real estate tax assessment of the property,yielding more
tax revenue to the City,and construction jobs will be added during the construction and
services proposed.
CONCLUSION
For all the reasons cited above,the Petitioner respectfully requests approval of all relief requested
in her petition.