The URL can be used to link to this page

55 DEARBORN STREET - BUILDING JACKET �Ja4FCYC(f0�0 UPC 10330 No. 153L �g C0 HASTINGS, MN %Jen-�b��'��- �S � �� - � � �� v��oxor,aQ CITY OF SALEM, MASSAcHusWrTrs,,-_ 0n`ry BOARD OF APPEAL CL ERii' I 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR S Or FiCE SALEM, MA 01970 s . ggO�MRie tl� TEL. (978) 745-9595 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. FAX (978) 740-9846 ZOOI NOV 21 4 /0-- 31 MAYOR DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH CORRENTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 55 DEARBORN STREET R-1 A hearing on this petition was held November 14, 2001 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Harris, Nicholas Helides and Joan Boudreau. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance from side yard setback and front yard setback to construct a farmers porch for the property located at 55 Dearborn Street located in an R- 1 zone. The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structure involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner is requesting variances for relief from side setback and front setback requirements. The requested relied is side setback of 6 feet and the required is 10 feet, front setback of 11 feet and the required is 15 feet. 2. The petitioner's property is an existing nonconforming lot in an R-1 zone and the proposed addition would exceed the side and front setbacks allowable according to the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 3. The right side setback of the existing structure is currently 4' plus or minus and the proposed addition will have a right side setback of 6'. The front setback will be 11' to the farmers porch and 8' to the stairs. r DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH CORRENTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 55 DEARBORN STREET R-1 pagetwo 4. Allowing the petition would not harm or be more detrimental to the neighbors. 5. The petitioner had no neighborhood opposition and a petition from the direct abutters was submitted in favor of the proposed addition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction, 4. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted November 14,2001 Stephen�Harris Board of Appeal r DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH CORRENTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED 55 DEARBORN STREET R-1 page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed„ that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal g��oxw CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS �v BOARD OF APPEAL CITY-OF SALEM, MA 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR CLERK'S OFFICE 0 SALEM; MA 01970 TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAX (978) 740-9846 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. 2002 OCT 24 A ID 50 MAYOR REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE VARIANCE GRANTED FOR JOSEPH CORRENTI FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 55 DEARBORN STREET R-1 At the hearing held on October 16, 2002, the Board of Appeal voted unanimously to allow a six (6) month extension for the Variance granted for Joseph Correnti for the property located at 55 Dearborn Street. The six (6) month extension is based on the previous decision having been recorded at the City Clerk's office on November 14, 2001. Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal SERAFINI, SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI. JR. 978-744-0212 JOHN E. DARLING 7BI-581-2743 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI October 4, 2002 TELECOPIER 978-741-4683 VIA HAND DELIVERY Nina Cohen, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeal 120 Washington. Street, 3`a Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Variances granted to property at 55 Dearborn Street Dear Ms. Cohen: I hereby request an extension of the above referenced variances which were granted by the Board in a Decision dated November 14, 2001, for a period of six (6) months from the effective date of that grant. The Board granted variances to the front and side yard setbacks to allow for the construction of a new front porch. However, additional time is necessary to put in place all of the necessary contracts for other work to be done at the property that does not requiring zoning relief. I would, therefore, respectfully request that this Board grant an extension as provided in General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 10, for an additional six (6) month period from the effective date of the variances granted for the property. Respectfully submitted, jS c o�eph C. Correnti JCC:dl Enclosures. V' L� r `1 CITY OF SALEM> MASSACHUSETTS,I i Y OF SA1L��E^M`1.�MA BOARD OF APPEAL CLEWS U('FMt - 120 1i 120 WASHINGITON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MA 01970 TEL. (978) 7459595 FAX (978) 740-9846 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. MAYOR =8215N411 Bk:1MN 02,18,2002 ®9:48:00 0THMR _ 1/: \� DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH CORRENTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 55 DEARBORN STREET R-1 A hearing on this petition was held November 14, 2001 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen,Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Harris, Nicholas Helides and Joan Boudreau. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance from side yard setback and front yard setback to construct a farmers parch.for the property located at 55 Dearborn Street located in an R- I zone. The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structure involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship,financial or otherwise,to the petitioners. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner is requesting variances for relief from side setback and front setback requirements. The requested relied is side setback of 6 deet and the required is 10 feet,front setback of 11 feet and the required is 15 feet. 2. The petitioner's property is an existing nonconforming lot in an R-1 zone and the proposed addition would exceed the side and front setbacks allowable according to the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 3. The right side setback of the existing structure is currently 4' plus or minus and the proposed addition Will have a right side setback of 6'. The front setback will be 11'to the farmers porch and 8' to the stairs. f 2M1821588411 8k:18332 Pg:1: * 02/16/2002 09:0.9:00 OTTER Pp 2 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH CORRENTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 55 DEARBORN STREET R-1 page two 4. Allowing the petition would not harm or be more detrimental to the neighbors. 5. The petitioner had no neighborhood opposition and a petition from the direct abutters was submitted in favor of the proposed addition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 4. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted November 14, 2001 /1� �'Cf Stephenanis T� Board of Appeal Date OEC 13 2001 I hereby certify that 20 days have exphd . fYom the date this instrument was moOM4 and that NO APPEAL has been filed In 56 office. A True Co � /r, ATTEST: CITY CLERK,Selem,MM. UTI Y Ur 3AIhML -- \ PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT AI.kDIFJU"ORM"LL _ J %tAYOR t.M WASNINGTM S7REEr '"�MAisnatt;sErrs 01970 ha:978-745-9S9S*FAit 979-740-9946 APPLICATION FOR THE REPAIR. RENOVATION. CONSTRUCTION. DEMOLITION. OR CHANGE OF USE OR OCCUPANCY, FOR ANY EXISTING STRUCTURE OR BUILDING 1.0 SITE INFORMATION Location Name: Building: -Property Address: -- rbo�-•� St Property Is located in a:Conservation Area YIN Historic District YIN 2.0 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 2.1 Owner of Land _ Name: -J r-r-cn + i Address: $Gt ri+e Telephone: ')-7 G- 7 y — a4 $$ 3.0 COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR WORK IN EXISTING BUILDINGS ONLY Addition Existing Renovation Number of Stories Renovated Change in Use New Demolition Existing Approximate year of Area per floor (sf) Renovated construction or renovation of existing building New Brief Description of Proposed Work: eR, `Z k7 jr) (4-rJr v s Mail Permit to: -04D 34( srngwrn tv 5f, dreos74+'1 me% 01& 07 What is the current use of the Building? 5� Material of Building? f.Jjnd our If dwelling, how many units? Will the Building Conform to Law? )etc _ Asbestos? Architect's Name Address and Phone Mechanic's Name HAMS ur.*2"o r Address and Phone_kUJ6-- Construction Supervisors License# HIC Registration# Estimated Cost of Pro' $ 3,oay Permit Fee Calculation Permit Fee $ Estimated Cost X$7/$1000 Residential — -- --- -- — — Estimated-Cost X$11/$1000-Commercial An Additional $5.00 is added as an Administrative charge. Make sure that all fields are properly and legibly written to avoid delays in processing. The undersigned does hereby apply for a Building Permit to build to the above stated specifications. Signed under penalty of perjury Date /a 'a-&� �� N ti > a s