22 CROWDIS STREET - BOA 3/23/84 22�(IOLIIS ST.
rSuc Tab.
0.
90XLargwLabdAma�
/// BMEAD
KEEPING YOU ORGANIZED
No. 10301
pfflwp�
Omm "t=@)
WOfiNYG
��.coxnrrl.�
(.9itu of "ittlem, Att552tr4usetts
PnttrD of 4vett1
� 44 4Y
�INIML��
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL - MARCH 28, 1984
A public hearing of the Salem Board of Appeal was held Wednesday, March 28,
1984 at 7:00 p.m. on the second floor of One Salem Green. Notice of said
hearing having been duly advertised in the Salem Evening News on March 7, 14,
1984. Abutters and other interested persons were notified by mail.
Present were: Messrs. , Hacker, Hopper, Strout and Associate Member Bencal
Hearing was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by the Chairman James Hacker. Mr.
Bencal was appointed a voting member and acting secretary.
Mr. Hacker explained to the assemblage that as there was only a four member
Board and it would take a unanimous vote to grant any petition, any one wishing
to withdraw without prejudice could do so at this time. Attorney George Vallis,
representing John Keane petitioner for 382 Highland Ave. , said he would like
to withdraw. He was allowed to do so.
122 Crowdis St. - Frank'&"Cheryl Romano
Mr. Hacker explained to the petitioner and to the assemblage that as this
case was continued from the March 21 , 1984 hearing to allow the Board to get
an opinion of the City Engineer and as this opinion was just given to the Board
and they have had no opportunity to, study it, this case will be continued until
the April 25, 1984 hearing. He also explained that two of the members who sat
at the last hearing were not hear tonight and Mr. Bencal was not present at
the last hearing and in fairness to all concerned it would be best to continued.
CONTINUED TILL APRIL 25, 1984.
8 Intervale Road - Edward & June Urbanski
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming side setback
by extending rear porch in this R-1 district. Mr. Bencal read the application
and a letter from the Fire Marshal which stated the Fire Dept. was opposed to
this petition as there is no Certificate of Compliance regarding smoke detectors.
Mr. Urbansky represented himself. He submitted a copy of the Certificate of
Compliance dated March 27, 1984 (on file) . He explained this would be a
32' x 14' enclosed porch and will be heated, the present porch is enclosed, this
will just be an enlargement. Mr. Hopper asked if this was just going to be
a one story addition. Mr. Urbanski said it was. Will be no closer to the
side yard that the existing house or porch. No one appeared in favor or in '
opposition. Hearing closed. Mr. Hopper made a motion to grant the petition
for a Special Permit to allow the 32' x 14' enclosed porch on condition it
be a single story addition as shown on the plan and that detailed plans be
submitted to the Building Inspector. Mr. Strout seconded. UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED