Loading...
29 CONGRESS STREET - SHETLAND - BUILDING JACKET �( Co NCS KCBs ST . to =NONE 3uperRib, LaiverIA"A MEAD® KEEPING YOU ORGANIZED No. 10301 PMWFEM Cq In=.w® C�elhrTae4 ww.dp.�wsy _+norm m"llum GETORCA l®ATSMEW.COM 5P �� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS n d=. BOARD OF APPEAL 0r?imeoa�`ts10 UN -3 A c� A 120 WASHINGTON STREET 1 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 FILE # MAYOR CITY CLERK, SALEM. MASS, June 3, 2015 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of SHETLAND PARK seeking Variances requesting relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum front yard setback and maximum lot coverage to construct a 15,600 square foot building. The property is located at 29 CONGRESS STREET(Map 34 Lot 448) (I Zoning District) A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on May 20, 2015 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, § 11. The hearing was closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair), Peter Copelas,Jimmy Tsitsinos,Tom Watkins and Mike Duffy. The petitioner is seeking Variances requesting relief from Sec. 4.1:1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum front yard setback and maximum lot coverage of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to construct a 15,600 square foot building. 1. In the petition date-stamped April 28, 2015, the Petitioner requested a Variances seeking relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum front yard setback and maximum lot coverage to construct a new 15,600 square foot building. 2. Attorney Quinn presented the petition on behalf of the applicant. 3. The proposed building is a one-story building oriented with frontage on Pingree Street. 4. The proposed building size is 15,600 square feet with a proposed a set-back of 15 feet. 5. The existing total lot coverage is 50.5%percent from buildings constructed in 1914. 6. The building will be leased to the Salem Academy Charter School to be used for a new athletic and arts center. 7. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner to reduce the setback from the required 30 feet to 15 feet and to allow a total of 51.8% that exceeds the maximum allowable lot coverage of fifty percent (50%). 8. At the public hearing seven (7) members of the public spoke in favor of and none (0) spoke in opposition to, the petition. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Variance: 1. Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land, building or structure generally not affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district include the pre-existing non- conforming dimension. The existing lot coverage from buildings built in 1914,is fifty-percent (509/6). „ City of Salem Board of Appeals June 3,2015 Project:29 Congress Street Page 2 of 2 2. The literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship because the existing buildings that were built in 1914 are uniquely solid construction with steel and thick concrete to withstand fire and are expensive to maintain and/or renovate. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Rebecca Curran (Chair), Peter Copelas, Jimmy Tsitsinos, Tom Watkins and Mike Duffy and none (0) opposed, to grant Variances, to allow a reduction minimum front yard and increase in maximum lot coverage of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to construct a 15,600 square foot building, subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards: 1. The Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. A Certificate of Inspection shall be obtained. 7. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. `kms e Com- Ag Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, zf any, .rba!l be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts Genera!Lamy Chapter 40A, and.shall be filed within 20 days of fling of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Lams Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shatl not take effect until a ropy of the decision bearing the certi6cate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. �v CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3m FLOOR �ahrae TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAx(978) 740-9846 HIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE DIRECl'OR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER April 13,2009 H.A.W.0 Inc. Candace Waldron-Director 27 Congress Street Salem Ma.01970 Dear Ms . Waldron, Thank you for sending me your"Articles of Incorporation". Based on my review of M.G..L 40A section 3, H.A.W.0 qualifies as an "Educational Use" and is exempt from Zoning Regulations in regard to use. If further information is required, please feel free to contact me directly. Sinc 7ly, Thomas SEPierre Zoning Officer/Building Commissioner The Commonwealth of Massachusetts = ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD One Ashburton Place - Room 1310 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 WILLIAM F. WELD (617) 727-0660 GOVERNOR 1-800-828-7222 DEBORAH A. RYAN Voice and TDD EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Fax: (617) 727-0665 TO Local Building Inspector Local Disability Commission Independent Living Center FROM: Architectur Access d 1 , 0 SUBJECT: — ( CQ DATE: Enclosed please find the following material regarding the above . premis 5: C✓— — ='=��� v Application for Variance Decision of the Board _Notice of Hearing _Correspondence _Letter of Meeting The purpose of this memo is to advise your office of action taken or to be taken by this Board. If you have any information which would assist this Board in making a decision on this case, you may call this office at (617) 727-0660 or 1-800-828-7222 (Voice or TDD), or you may submit comments in writing to the above address. Thank you for your interest in this matter. 04/03/1998 14:09 6177270665 ARCHIIECTURA ACCESS PAQ-� 03 9. For each variance requested, state In detail the reasons why compliance with the Board's regulations is impracticable. State the necessary cost of the work required to achieve compliance with the regulations. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU SHOULD SUBMIT WRITTEN COST ESTIMATES AS WELL AS PLANS JUSTIFYING THE COST OF COMPLIANCE. Use additional sheets 0 necessary. 50L AMNC" 10. Hasa building permit been applied for? N0 ••- Has a building permit been issued? 10a. If a building permit has been issued what date was It issued? 10b. If work has been completed,state the date the building permit was issued for said work 11. State the estimated cost of construction as stated on the above building permit. goo 11a. If a building permit has not been issued,state the anticipated construction cost: 12. Have any otter building permits been issued within the past 24 months? yb 12a, If yes, state the dates that permits were issued and the estimated cost of construction for each permit: 13. Hasa certificate of occupancy been issued for the facility? up( If yes, state the date: 14. To the best of your nowledge, has a complaint ever been filed on this building relative to accessibility?__yes no. 15. State the actual assessed valuation of the BUILDING s1NLY AS REGQEDED w THE ASSESS041S OFFICE of the municipality in which the building located. �IlA Is the assessment at 1 . If not what Is the town's current assessment ratio? 16. State the phase of design or construction of the tacitly as of the date of this application: &ANNIN(- 17. State the name and address of the architectural or engineering firm including the name of the individual architect or engineer responsible for preparing drawings of the facility: cal - TEL 18.State the name and address of the building inspector responsible for overseeing this project: Eo Terivi Sc,4J SAtEiA MA TEL: PLEASE NQM:The Board may, in its discretion,hold a hearing on your application for variance.The Board may also decide your application without a hearkV, based upon the Information you submit. You should therefore include all relevant information with your application. At minimum the pians should include a site plan, an floor plana, elevations, sections and details. Photographs_of existi'nig conditions are ntirernelyImpartant. Date: � ;7 �y PRINT'- 6 �y-i_ Name of owner or author¢e agent dl Cun L�aSr, t/nr /d7 Cit own /� e State Zip code /�P�1 /[�t� 1/78'- -)yl- 0677 V101 lJ signature TelepFgne FILING FEE: ENCLOSE A $50.00 CHECK MADE PAYABLE TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 04/03/1998 14:09 6177270665 ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS PAUE 02 L The Commonwealth of Massachusetts ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD One Ashburton Place - Room 1310 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 WILLIAM F. WELD 1617 727-0660 oovEanofl 1-800.828-7222 DE130RAH A. RYAN Voice and TDD EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Fax; (617) 727-0665 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE In accordance with M.Q.L.,Chapter 22,Section 13A, I hereby apply for modification of or substitution for the rules and regulations of the Architectural Access Board as they apply to the facility described below on the the grounds that liberal compliance with the Boards regulations is impracticable in my case. I. State the name and address o1 the wn r of the buildingdacifity: �NOFPF.UDr YiNlr CEivT �F 7 Im4rif Sfbdvo rr Alk e Teh eF Ay -� 2. State the name and address or ocher identcation of the bul(dmg/facility_ shtEj o DFFt � .n✓s .ac ®e�� Rr Itor.vs- [9N� 3. Describe the taoi8ty:fNurr�erof floors,type of functions, use, �GUD2 7+�nQ.t 7IVir CDNS�9'TiM 4C /'lfiGi��" . - Oucrrutf�. SU�1t5 _ 4. Total square footage of the building- Per floor: a total square footage of tenant space (if applicable): Z-L-po 5. Check the work performed or to be performed: —New Construction_Addition ✓Reconstruction, remodeling, alteration Change of Use S. Briefly describe the extern and nature or the work Performed or to be performed: (Use additional shoots 0 necessary). See tf- 1E�12`,Lel�— 7. State each section of the Architectural Access Board regulations forwhich a variance Is being requested. 7a. Check appropriate regulations: X1996 Regulations 1982 Regulations _Other SECTION NUMBER LOt ATION OR DESCRIPTION �D•� Buc Chu ET 30.9. 1 a 11C TD1LC� hROJM &IM& A &ieA& WAWA 8. 'Is the building historically sign8leant? yes ✓rw. t no,go to number 9. 88. If yes,check one of the following and indicate date of listing: National Historic Landmark Listed Individually on the National Register of Historic Places Located In registered historic district Listed in the State Register of Historic Places Eligible for listing Sb. If you checked any of the above tip your variance request is based upon the historical significance of the building, you must provide a letter of determination from the Massachusetts Historical Commission, 80 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116. INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER of the North Shore and Cape Ann, Inc . 27 CONGRESS STREET, SUITE 107 • SALEM, MA 01970 (978) 741-0077 v/TTY • (978) 741-1133 FAx SERVING: Beverly April 27, 1998 Danvers Architectural Access Board One Ashburton Place, Room 1310 Essex Boston, MA 02108 Gloucester Dear Board, Hamilton Ipswich The Independent Living Center of the North Shore and Cape Ann Incorporated requests a variance for accessibility modifications to our Agency's bathroom. The variance Lynn specifically relates to installation of grab bars to the side and rear of the toilet. Because Lynnfield of the limited space inside our one and only bathroom, we are unable to install bars of the recommended 42" length. Manchester By-The-Sea We are proposing to construct a 54" H x 36" L x 8" W half wall to the right of our toilet Marblehead with a grab bar of 32" installed from the rear wall (opposed to 12" from the rear wall). Nahant This shortened length will allow us to offer a 36" clear path of travel for persons who use wheelchairs to access our sink. Our other option would be to order a longer(36" long x Peabody 36"high) free standing, special order grab bar that would be secured to the wall on one Rockport end, and secured to the floor on the other end. The Massachusetts Office on Disability favors the half wall idea and compromising on the grab bar length vs. using a free Rowley standing grab bar. Salem The grab bar that we wish to install in the rear of the toilet can only be a maximum of Saugus 28" because of a) the distance from the entrance door of the bathroom to the center line of the toilet allows 12"; and h) the distance from the center line of the toilet to the new Swampscott half wall allows for 16" (as the distance to the half wall must be 18" from the center line Topsfield of the toilet). We will install the longest grab bars possible to accommodate our disabled consumers. Wenham We have enclosed copies of photographs and an architects drawing depicting the small size of our bathroom, and showing the current state of inaccessibility. (Our previous correspondence dated March 30, 1998 we enclose original photographs. We would appreciate it if you include these photographs in the packets.) We have also enclosed a non-scaled diagram showing the proposed grab bar locations, and the position of the half wall in relation to the sink. We also are aware that we must remove existing grab bars, relocate our towel dispenser, install a toilet paper holder, upgrade to an angled mirror, and re-mount our entrance door to swing outward in the other direction to become accessible. "OUR GREATEST NEED AS HUMAN BEINGS IS THE FREEDOM TO PURSUE OUR DREAMS" Please keep in mind that our Agency is a small non-profit service agency with a limited budget. We have set aside $1,000 for accessibility improvements in our bathroom, and want to go forward with our plans to become accessible as soon as possible. We have a contractor willing ready to the work, but we need your acceptance. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact either of us at the number above. Sincerely, d &a_� eab�' t Donna Cram Robin Kellett Co-Director Co-Director i T FLUSH MI zpo —'-- TILE To '}' HGT D�vLt x �ro i =A RECLPTACLE e N N `1 DISPENSER �y TOWEL `I i �15PC NSER E m 18 �8 • '11LE 10 4' H67 d- �� TILE ro q� NGT I'/4� U CERAMIC 'TkLE FlOo(2 �• N! NEAO (AEr�6� � W w CEILING BEAM 0 -A— � Q 0 i I 1 SPMNItLER in HEAD ABWE 3 „ DOOR 3=ox6 8 zI �4 // bdoR 19/8„ DooR i EX\STING T?iNTHRovM 1 - u v y1 . f , � IL WOOp Ilt tit 1 _ t T, ps� mt. 4 7 t3.�.. i i! E t f P i t6 July 6 , 1989 n t. Mr. Stephen Santry _, m Salem Building Department One Salem Green �m Salem, MA 01970 nn — �rn Cos n;< v n Folder No. 88-036 "' o <89-048> N Q Re: Kevin-J. Doyle Computer-Consulting-SystemsF' tF Tj oO 5, Quad 2 -/ Bui 1 d ing-No..-1J Shetland Properties Salem, MA 01970 Dear Steve, The following shall serve as written clarification as to the requirement for number of "classroom" egress doors at the above referenced project. Based on MBC section 612 .2.1, only classrooms being occupied by children under the age of twelve (12) shall require two (2) means of egress. The use of the "classroom" is for training computer personnel and therefore all trainees shall be adults. If you are of a difference of opinion, or if you require more information, please advise. 7tf lly bmi ted, ermore H. If. Mormt 0 Co. , Inc. 40 Beach cStrcct Manchester. Massachusetts 01944 (508) 526'7393 May 26 , 1989 �, c o =s z n �rn O Mr. Steve Santryr`r ; n' Salem Building Department One Salem Green o m Salem, Massachusetts 01970 n y � N cn Folder No. 89-030a ' Field Report No. 2 Reference: Building No. 4 Renovation Shetland Propertied �27 Congress Street Salem, Massacfiusetts 01970 Dear Steve, A recent site visit reveals that the masonry demolition at Building #4 South appears to the best of my knowledge to comply with our construction documents. 1. General Status a. No further demolition of bays has occurred. 2. Conditions On Site a. Concrete forms have been erected for new window curbs at bays #7 through #15. All construction appears to the best of my knowledge to , comply with the Massachusetts State Building Code. If you are of a difference of opinion, please advise. - ---- ---- Respectfu-ll-y-submitted, St a W. L' more President : 4�a ' ' fQit of $a1em, 749ussar4uscib 18 10 58 J.: 1 p08ra of c41P211 fits# 91TY CLERK.BALLH.MASS. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SHETLAND TRUST FOR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF VARIANCES AT t-29`CONGRESS STREET ( I ), A hearing on this petition was held on November 9, 1988, with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs . Peter Strout, John Nutting, Arthur LaBrecque and Peter Dore . Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem F_vening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chanter 40A . The petitioner, The Shetland Trust, also },.sown and sometimes referred to as Shetland Properties, is requesting a six month extension, running until May 22 , 1989 , of the variance decision originally granted to Shetland by vote of the Board on November 23 , 1987 which allowed the construction of a structured parking garage; further, the petitioner is requesting a modification of that original decision which will allow construction at the garage in accord with a revised set of building plans as submitted to and reviewed by the Board . The Extension of the original variances may be granted in the discretion of the Board pursuant to the requirements and provisions of Chapter 40A Section 10; further, the Board may grant the Modification upon findings by the Board that: a . special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which do not generally affect other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SHETLAND TRUST FOR EXTENSION AND 0 MODIFICATION OF VARIANCES AT 29 CONGRESS STREET, SALEM Page 2 b. a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the petitioner; and C . desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantial derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance . At the hearing Attorney William F. Quinn, representing the petitioner, described delays in the construction as originally scheduled as a result of several factors, including changing parking needs at Shetland, the redesign of the garage by a successor architect, and delays in obtaining approval of a federal UDAG Loan which was sponsored by the City to assist Shetland in constructing the garage . Mr. Quinn, together with the project architect and the project construction manager reviewed the revised plans with the Board. They described the changes, which include an increase in the height of the garage from two levels above grade to three levels above grade, for an overall height of about 30 feet, an increase in the number of parking spaces in the garage to a total of 785 spaces, and other minor design changes . Mr. Quinn and the architect represented to the Board that the front yard setback from Pingree Street would remain 15 feet as allowed in the original variance, and that the lot coverage would be slightly less than as originally varied, because the footprint of the garage had been decreased. Mr. Quinn further represented to the Board that the petitioner would construct in complete conformity with the landscaping and other conditions required under the original variance decision. DECISION (�N JLHE 1-ET1TlON OF THE SHETLAND TRUST FOR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF VARIANCES AT 29 CONGRESS STREET, SALEM Page 3 Several residents of Pingree Street attended the hearing asked questions, and spoke in favor of the application; no one appeared or spoke in opposition to the application. Based upon the materials and presentation made to it, the Board found that the facts, the special conditions and the conclusions recited in original the Board Decision granted on November 23, 1987, still exist, that the extension and modification can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and that the parking garage would significantly contribute to relief of the conaested on-street parking situation in the neiahho hood . Therefore, the Board voted unanimously to grant the extension of the variance decision for six months, until May 22 , 1989, and to modify the decision to incorporate and allow construction in conformity with the plans prepared by Engineers Design Group, Inc . , subject to the following conditions: 1 . all of the six enumerated conditions recited in the original November 23 , 1987 Decision which are as follows: a. that the petitioner obtain a Site Plan Special Permit from the Planning Board, a building permit and all other required permits; b. that the structure comply with all pertinent fire codes and regulations; C . that all lighting fixtures be directed downward and inward from the perimeter so as to minimize affecting the neighborhood; DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SHETLAND TRUST FOR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF VARIANCES AT 29 CONGRESS STREET, SALEM Page 4 d. structure be located no closer than fifteen ( 15 ) feet to the lot line; e. existing green space be maintained and expanded as shown on the plans and be installed as part of the construction of the first phase of the structure, all under the direction of the City Planner; and f. a Certificate of Occupancy be issued; 2 . the petitioner shall post signage on its property and will cooperate with the neighbors and municipal officials to discourage heavy truck traffic along Pingree Street; 3 . that construction activities be conducted only during hours allowed by municipal ordinance, and in accordance with all conditions adopted by the Salem Planning Board in its Amended Special Permit Decision granted to the petitioner on September 8, 1988 . EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION GRANTED. James Fleming, ChaiIrman A copy of this Decision has been filed with the Planning Board and the City Clerk. F.rP A.L FRG" THIS D_,IS10N. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MATS." GENERAL L...,3. CHAP-.ER K-, AND SHALL "BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING G THIS DE:.i S:�.'� IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Pui:S"':T TO !,::.;5. SEN,-RAI LAWS. CHAPTER 808, SECTION 11. THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT F RA':-':' SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION. BEARING THE CERT- FI( C.- -,HE :C5 CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, uR TH': 1, SOU, AN APPEAL HAS SEEN FILE, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS 1% T?l' S-' "H ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL July 6, 1988 Mr. Steve Santry Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Folder No. 38.019 Field Report 5 REFERENCE: Building No. 4 Renovation Shetland Properties 35 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Steve: A recent site visit reveals the office renovation that - with the exception of the following items - appears to the best of my knowledge to comply with our revised Construction Documents and with the Mass. State Building Code: 1 ) The half walls in the large spaces of the Drawing "Al" are to be eliminated. 2) Mechanical Room door at column line 17.18/A.B swings out into the corridor. 3) Column encasements at typical columns have increased from 2' -0" square to 3' -0" square. All column encasements adjacent to interior partitions have been enlarged to attach to partitions. 4) A temporary and permanent egress scheme has been delineated on drawing "Al " Revision "4" for your review and approval . Respectful )Jsubmit d, tP n W_ 1a rn-: U1 ;.. -r -r co K. K. Morant 0 Co. , Inc. 40 Beaeh.c5treet Manchester, Massachusetts 01944 (617) 526-7393 SHETLAND PROPERTIES, INC. P — 27-CONGRESS STREET P.O. BOX 986. SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 617-744-0556 SALEM SHETLAND INVESTMENTS 617-289-2506 BOSTON SHETLAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 800.225-6826 TOLL FREE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 617-744-2076 TELECOPY , r--SHETLAND PROPERTIES.+�. 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES ... OF CHICAGO LIMITED PA RTNERS MIP SHETLAND PROPERTIES 1 OF SALEM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF COON COUNTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP +..r 617.744.0556 912-9215400 617-744 0570 912 312 92154W -0 736279 TELECOPY 312.9216680 TELECOPY July 5, 1988 n C_ Steven Santry Assistant Building Inspector Q City of Salem One Salem Green Salem Massachusetts 01970 F'1` Cn � co Dear Mr. Santry: ' Enclosed are the fire rating specifications required - by the Building Department which include the carpet classification and flame spread data of both Building One, third and fourth quadrants, for the Language Technology offices, and Building Four for the Sears Credit offices at Shetland Properties. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 744-0556. Sincerely, SHETLAND PROPERTI OF SALEM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP y its sole Gen r Partner Shetland Properties, Inc. J J. K Vl r ject ager J /mef E closure '*Pu grt n or w tc.SHETLAND PROPERTIES. INC..0.GT.c.a P-'-M G--G'L�*or W...I-Ul or WICI wv Ift a ,a 61c1 I.T.[Ul,vm ST.rts"o C...n. ® SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 9 CHICAGO.ILLINOIS • BRAMPTON (TORONTOI ONTARIO.CANADA JUL 05 'BE 06:44 KRMCO SUPPLY CORP. P. 1 -F .) , 0ja;ij All i The "Professional" Distributor 27 Normac Rd, • i • • Ht.3 Industrial Park 8051 So.Willow St. 344 Riverside St. 12 Avenue 0 P.O. Box 2080 50 Finnan Drive Manchester,NH 03108 Portland,ME 04103 Williston,VT 05495 Woburn, M4 01066 Weymouth, MA 02188 (603)627.3003 (207)776.6612 (802)863-5287 (017) 038-0009 (617)337-1833 RAPIFAX COVER SHEET T0: FROM9 Lac, Cs cm tC n R eta'- • 10 � ��\ � SUBJECT: r- K PAGES TO FOLLOW (INCLUDING COVER SHEET ) ""� van cu DISTRIBUTORS FOR Alcan • Armstrong r Cefolex • Cerlainked 0 Chicago Ma14111C • COhwed • Dann Poamutn • Oenlex a HIIII Hunler Douglas Ladd • Levolor * National Rolling Mills s Owens Corning . Perry • United Butes Oypsum DISTRIBUTORS OF AmuelIcRI Ceiling Tiles • Suspension Systems • Linear Metal Ceilings • Accusticat Well Treal"nt 0 Fiberglass Insulation Beed Board • Urelhnnes • Thsrmax s Extruded Polystyrene s Energy Shield s Bound Attenuation Blanket • Metal 2 Furring a 8csllolds Ladders s Pins 8 Shots s Clips • Thermoelud Insulation s Poly Veme • Foam Calling Tike Accessories JUL 05 '88 08:49 KRMCO SUPPLY CORP. P.2 Twenty-Nine Products Including concealed and reveal edged tile. lay-in panels, viny) coated panels, and colored panels and tile. Six Edge Treatments BKR beveled. BKR square, TGF iytiJre, and re�eaL -•'•�'' '�i' '- a,�p',t.r:? r);i•� .rp; Six Sizes From 12" x 12" t0 30"x 60rr tj14 ,{,d'S 1 t w. qp, r •a( ;'l"nr •xy.'r1� i r 47.:..;:A Ht�h ^✓4}t��U' 7,�• Two Thicknesses a' ". ' ' r!r7✓6u,tWf, r zj :. 5/8"or )/4". Natural Fissured Patterns Two patterns that complement each <•':,;: ; .:- ''' ' i{l:'%'F other, allowing installation in '•n•'•.�;::,.;::".;, ,•:. .,. •. adjoining ceiling areas without ~"` "'i' fa: ;,C` i•,';' disrupting the flow of the natural , .,., �;•.,', fissured surface pattern. Three Colors Classic white, toast and ecru offer excitement and versatility to any interior decor. t y [ h t �� i�X b1 l "'•... . °'i I! t, rcq Yr"� ProduN�t �. A�'Y .� -�yi t.' "� �`t ��' Tro;' iN� Thumd �Comp[aMe Flan[ PYe Rn Natural Fissured,. ` N £ t� STC ;, NRC ) -1 lehl . Ru44n[[ Gnd 6�:tsm Bprad - Hom ... ..t., rumbM.,'.' �- �,Bia�,•., a RMp S;Renae rP/Meana - ?•';tR) ,:' :Serb Dambrt Index Rat STANDARD CONCEALED TILE TGIF LRI - Adhesive Square Edge 52030 jex12x12 10-04 SS•.65 I S6 25 (over 75%a) Application, STANDARD CONCEALED TILE ' Butt e & R 52429 %xI2xI2 LRI 156 Concealed Beveled Edge 53429 40 35 63 25 b �/,xl2xl2 (over 73%) 1,87 200j800 STANDARD CONCEALM)Tii,E' Butt K& R 52428 xl2xI2 LRI 156 Concealed _ Square Edge 528 xl2xl2 ��' 33 65 2S (over 7596) 1 67 200/600 FIRE-RATED CONCEALED TILE s Butt K& R LRI Concealed I,2, Square Ede 30428 ,xi2xl2 404 ',60 7D 183 Hou q 8 (over 7596) 230/850 IS Rahn %'Natural Fissured ]1� � t�+ pr"^'tjf^ySl'r(t .1�'4 rr, �� r�,t' ?r'�" eg ni�"a31q ,kd ;lAt ' �✓ i �i.' �' ^ 't a LAY-IN PANELS 5674 II) 4000 567010(11) x24x60 56782(567W11) 230x60 JSa9 .55.45. (over 75%) 152 550000 25 — '. - x2424, 800 C Square Edge ,- Ecru 3661 11) d x24x48 Pumice Ecru 56614(11) x24x24 35 39 .55 65 NA 1.32 Toast 36605((11)) x24x48 25 — Toast 56604(Iq x24x24 Sandstone z JUL 05 '88 08:51 KRMCO SUPPLY CORP. P.3 Fire-Ratings r All Comved ceiling products are Produet�1` Slxe U .Dealgn i. evaluated under the U.L. ASTM E44 Fire Hazard Test which examines A-003(3 hr)"F" individual product performance in a G-002(2 hr)'F" controlled test fire. Fire-Rated Natural 12"x 12" G-007(2 hr)•F" products. such as Natural Fissured Fissured G-006!2 hr)"F" L-006(I hr)"F" and Natural Fissured 11, are also evaluated under the U,L, ASTM 24"x24" E-1 19 Time Design Assembly Test. Reveal 0-215(3 hr)"F" This test grades the ceiling performance of a building's basic D"209(2 hr)"F" structural assembly. Ratings are 24•x24' G-204(2 hr)'F" stared in hours (1, 11/2, 2, etc.)and are _ given for specific floor/ceiling, A-204(3 hr)"F" P-201 (I hr)"R" roofs ceiling assemblies. D•201 (2 hr)"F" P-202(I hr)"R" Natural 0-201 (1 hr)"F" P•203(% hr)`R" 24'x48" G•202(2 hr)"F" P-230(I hr)"R" U,L, Time Design Fire-Rated Fissured If G-204(I y,hr)"R" P"230(I]/, hr)"R" Conwed Fire-Rated Ceiling boards 0.213(2 hr)"F" P-235(I hr)"R" meet the U.L. requirements of I Ib. 0-213 0 hr)"F" P-243(I hr)"R" per sq. ft. Hold-down clips are not G-240(2 hr)'F" P-246(I hr)"R" J-201 (2 hr)"F" required or necessary. Note:"F"end"R"designate Flood Ceiling or Roof,'Cciling Aascmblics. yE w� ' Ree a PtT t a p f + NR :Theroid Comp7Matible' Flame Fin Redout Natural Fissured II Cont" d n° od C' t iglu r hunu b. Grid Syuem i ' BpnNou ed rly _ 1 ,*.,ltlumber• +�tt reSp1s'!r` (R nge '','L Rmge ., ;:Rdbcrutee, c , (R) aeHp Number �. . la4s+� Rqe ::', FIRE-RATED LAY-IN PANELS M772(1 I) %x20x60 56773(11) %44x60 4044 %, 1,2,3 Square Edge >' 56774(11) - %00x60 5545 LRI 1.36 250 IS Hour over 75%) 850 56766(11) %x24x24 35-39 ( Ratings 56765(11) %x2Ax48 4044 STANDARD VINYL COATED LAY-IN PANELS . . LRI 200 Square Edge 56706(11) %x24x4g 35-39 .55-.65 1.52 500 25 ' (over 75%) 900 + x.9,"..pb�s1 k9i�r k 'ir a h Natural Fissured/Natural Fissured II s STAN DAR DREVEALTILE 55500 %44x24 .4044 1.87 200 52704(11) yrx2444 35-39 .5545 LRI152 500 25 Square52705(11) r/tlx24x48 35-39 (over 75%) 1.52 800 r— Reveal Edge " T �L Ern 5261401) %x24x24 ..35.39 35-.65 NA 1.52 Pumice 27 Toast 52604(11) %x24x24 Sandstone FIRE-RATED REVEAL.TILE —4— Square 55501 Y44x2il 40.44 60 70 LRI 1.93 250 IS 2 Hour IIS Reveal Edge 50704(11) %x24x24 35"39 (over 75%) 1.36 950 Ruling •Note (II)indicutex Nniund Piesured II puticrn , ••Nnnlin:d Sird112e121i1e ix nclwd hire.'nc�IhicM nexx ix nominal sire.) 1n � � ,�N.F��� v1��.0.�, . r ... " ,.. f � ,4 r r .�v ♦ y :�S , . y. , r Standeird 1. 1 . 50-70 35-44 LR-1 25 V' F . 50-70 35-44 LR-1 255 56-765 7. 1 E841-00) USG Interlort, Inc. U.L Standard 264(AS7 M E 119).sea current Sweets Catalog A 1 1 of UL Fire Resistancti DIreclory for details. Chicago, 1111nolS 6010" This Sample Is representative 91 the textUts and COIDT101 the 82"Pits Ujilftf Roll; Aumiow produtt named above, 1. not use for dimensional1 measurement or physical testing.See Current dWi shall for individual product physical prOpWOS.7.�E13 .N'Y "y�„`,>,1TY•711F1.�,t�. }(, f��w�i� 'V!��'' ra,t�ECT�.��yr�,�t.�'h.{�y.a�7 jY-C..�'7�•• w. �A Y I q 1� ''^'^'"9Syy�]�in{ a yP r lF y � r n��'16yr0.Jt(•'Y'.,�+�w ./"^qr[�-.��.f}a��2*'��i!'"�. ,� a' {, p1 �" rt"Ytl. °F /j(�'`'� '.t�+.• ,,n. y � 4��gq��'y'(,• W �µ.�.�rr���p�.``�I Y+ rs'�.'"'fy�CNS` •4. r y.��5,,'� ,p' >Y1 yr +b{,�S �¢{f'.,�• � t - 4'di •ii�1 � t�y4.vt�+\F)iy+va rI�} ra -:�,�.�, r, C��."ls ��,�.2�'.1 v ,s(N.a � Yf , ` •� ` i ,�M=r h�"'A• �' �^eNe�^,"�,,1 %{-' l;ra�,�• "� r�`"�$_�^*'.r..fr�_�iu, + ' � `f;n�+' �4',:""� �f* 'l ° s�'/ t' g�b�' �lCn� �k7.�.1�T•�,:`�Fy'.+Ir~+t '�*y',.�-11R^+��- '. ,�.f---yy",,r,,1 ,'`a1'�,' 1gi� ;r. «; .F '�, k! S '� r ♦,1 i l •iri l+(, 1y « - � '' '�.h' Nv�p'"^•i1j r �,.,��'1 t �!� u. � �I' « a',�{ �[, rpy im r�y�, a � 7f�+F ��{? r�^„�,.+, '4M 1 F�Fw•Y4 '} mi.\�`rii,�,J� t ,r t Y n.'( 3 y�'° {c'�f )""q_?{},-T'r 1 1 „� rr.}.. # '�'F'"V 9 77 �`�i ,( f Al r �j" ta1r� i! ey�.•t�_ f Iljii••Y i .� e u �~���r ^�f�•4. >�jnl� Q �f,r�,ln :w,�`L.,p� "`'*::.�r ll�k �r �.,..t� �(,tF yjY. }\:. "y xT Y c 'X�f �"'! �✓ vF�.\at.^+ ro. ,u�f l N Yi �Y.�P .Yr�+ •- a '; f N'.`i; 0.a`r 1 '�''�"k°"Jtl t'' rr '�''t-+ '+rF F r t Y.l�"'.n +l ''+ t t�'"f`•. r4. ;4 Y7 i;� 6 .•Ln. j��W � r '�'<rw;,. 1Zi',a'.it ,t\� :w,,,,�J4' F'(A � .i � -L.r..}}�,t j,� i�] �''� ' f iT pp "� qM I •4 r• 1. F IC 1 SIT y, 'TONY F i� � ` ,�•,�t�rt�Lii'���..f 0"k>♦J~pr'Ny��l+ klY�,wir �n i� Mv- � Y L�,0.Y�C. .i ILgY��,.. "' .1' 1TM; " _ - M�ia"klr.� � lr�'y�iir,"�� •'"'"r� �,}1_ MJt�k'�"�t:tl ri��j�i'". 1. �„1,. �y,'�q�y�, Y1'�'"Tq',W'�rrr t''�'y �J"^,`,Y'n5'r`� V! � 1 .mN.M�.. '•� aM�.a.'��,.j�r .�`'"• ":'4 "^Whr •t7T} r►r► l�j. '�r' al+`ef ;+f r€.f' '�• '�WI. r 4" ♦ ((JJ V . PAX TRANSMITTAL COVER LETTER DATE: SEND TO: - Q V L ke- �✓ COMPANY : S {� C O.rf� �� 4 �Q f.S COMMENTS : {- t Ile 4 SENT BY: ; � leu f f—i �. tSeti _ COMPANY : BEN ELF'MAN & SON, INC. FAX NUMBER: (617) 884-3946 Ntu JuI. 30 .193UO NUMBER OF PAGES SENT: r. —41 � cr t' r I.l Jam. ',EST NUMgkn 1IU..;6WV4Al4Y114Y V LV�IYYCV Cr Asa"� P.O. Dox 1948/ 1603 Murray Avenue Dalton, Ctcorole 30722.1946/Phone 404-278-3013 CUSTOMFk Hollytex Carpet Miller Inc. August: 4r 1987 SUBJECT: Specimens of the submitted samples Were prepared and tested In accordance With the procedures proposed by the National Bureau of SUMclards, Technical Note 706 and NFPA 268, ASTM E-662. SMOKE DENSITY TEST (NSS) Operating Condltlons Irradlance: 2.5 watts/em' 0 Factor 132 Thermal Exposure: Plaming Furnace voltage: 110 Sumer Fuel: Propane Sample Dasoription style: 5se—itidgeas*st WALL Sr 30 Color: 430 Greenstone Roll No.: 80013163 Fiber: Pill*: 30. 0 oz . Secondary backing: Action Seta Teat Results et N2 e3 Avg. Chamber Temperature,%aF, (start) 95 95 95 Chamber Pressure Maintained positive, under 3" H=O Min, Transmittanoo (TM), % 40% 121 _ 279 at, minutes 9 . 25 3 . 00 8.00 6. 75 Max. Spec. DO. Density (Dr.1) 53 122 75 83 C:ea'r Beam, (DC) 6 20 12 !3 DM, CORRECTED (DMC) 47 •102 63 71 Soeo, Opt Density at 1,5 min. 22 so 27 53 Spec, Opt, Density at 4.0 min. 41 122 67 79 Timo tc t Tl% N4, min0w,, 4 .0n .. 7,-.40 4 . n 5 _ 3•. 4 Tin+pto DS�■`tr5� i utas ! • 3 27 Auth Odfgnstut TFX�1: F T1:3TiN13 1`F sl:lr f wwr mo L• ld IV.1. 1:.V/11,Y m:. lY:.,.U ♦ •n.• .. nn¢pldi pJW.a v1 Ihgnp• 1. .pM YP 'Tr!'nn,gp.ll. n.. •Pfi':':n ..1 •M ♦•el,...on •P Q.•1b+In• '.Innr ,nYdPVln 90 .• .... ,w .,. 7T/ET 'd 0>l6UGt9NH .10 X3iA-nOH E2:VT 8B, OF Nnr ndependent TC-ST NUMpEF, , Te Totino K0, Box 1040/ 1503 Murray Avenue Dalton, Gcorgla 30722.1848/ Phone 404.2783013 CUSTOMER; tiollytex CarPet Millar Shp. Atiquat 4 , 1987 SUBJECT; t3peolmene of the submitted aamplea wore prepareend proposed by the National bureau of Standards, T 1d 4 n d sled In accordance with theprocedures ote TO and NAPA poo, ASTM E-8fl2 SMOKE DENSITY TEST (N9S) Operating Condition, Irradlance; Thermal axposurr: 2,5 5 wetbPomvFlaming a Aaotor 122 purnros Voltage; 110 aumor Fust; maple Description atyte: 64 Color: 430 Greehstorte •• WALL S7 3f� Roil No,: 80013163 Fiber: Pill: 30.0 oz. 8aoondary Backing: ACtion Sac Test Result$ of chamber Tomporeturewe2 s3F. (start) Avg. Chamber Pressure 05 os Maintained positive, under 3" Mv0 Min. Transmittance (TM), yo Ott minutes 9q 39% Max. SPeC, Opt. Density (DM) . 9 0 38% G (ac)ear Beam, 1 16.10 15. 83 6 DM, CORRECTED (D6MC) 167 106 Spec, Opt Density at o ...L7751 a a SPec. Opt. DenU4Min, 179 179 ty et 4,0 min, l 1 7'-"" :t' 00% DKK. jin6j0,, 48 50 1 "to () 6253 Ti ^oe 2.759. 50 - 3� " 1�f ;—$.73 2. 75uthonicd 91 _ Aal o --- ---- --�� IF 0' r r •. blplftfe U�p 1plwrh nm rot rnn'•.r,iy.,rn UFU pI Pi.eyYtpnv r `, . . r9., itmrl!.ru0addreeepd,egn111.jrp0,ry�,1,nicMronlnw^Y uMvr•o'rN,gnnl 1' 0>WUCl Ny 3p X3-LA 10H E2tV1 13R, ac w i V . • J Irdenendent T+e:xt lo' P.O. ©ox 1948 / 1503 Murray Avonue Dalton, Georgia 30722-1948 / Phone 404-278-3013 REPORT CUSTOMER: Hollyte)c Carpet Mills, Ing. August 4 , 1987 SUBJECT: Specimens of the submitted samples were prepared and tested In accordance with ASTM E-648 and/or Federal Test Method 372. NFPA 263 FLOORING. RADIANT PANEL TEST Semple Description Style: 39gat WALL ST. 30 Color 430 Greenatone Roll No.: 80013163 _ Fiber, Pile: 3 0.0 ,o z Secondary backing: Action Sao Test Assembly Mounted On Transits Test Results 8escimen No. 1 $Perlman No. 2 Specimen No.3 Critical Radiant Flux: 158 watts/omt . 62 wattb/cm° . 53 watts/cm, Total Burn Length: 37.0 cm. 35.0 cm, 39.0 cm. Flame Front Out: 45. 0 minutes 40.0 minutes 47 .0 minutes Average Critical Radiant Fiux: i' , 3 � watts/cmc (may Estimathd Standard Deviation 05 watts/cm, 9 i coefficient of variation �.LY V 1 ciw iattl,U L ,E • 6t/'ct 'd ONat C NNd .40 X31A-110H 22:17T 88, oc wnr ' gat results calculated on the basis of the area:, under the curves lar. cnpread distance, temperature, and smoke density versus time aro _a in the table belos; for calibration ma:(.r9.a1"i rrd for . L. L S—r .3 O I Fuel I Smoke aerial Description I Flamespread I Contributed I bensity Density Inorganic I i 1 , forced Cement board 1 0 1 0 1 0 Oak Flooring 1 100 1 100 I 100 I ! I 481 I 50 ' 1 30 1 40 -ww-----w------------ww------------- ww......www....................... 2VATIONS OF TESTED SPECIMENS9 Pile eonsumed to 91 , melted to 20 ' . ,RXSt Burning on the tunnel floor was observed during the test. :LUSIONS: Based on one test, the flameapread, calculated according tSTM E-84-86, meets Class B - 75 or under flamespread, . REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED BY: v CC's. / / ��i.IC wr—' 1�.t...,'k,}.v!� � . ...!.•rra.•.,r'."" . STEPHEN L. KAY SER RUSSELL L. CNApMAN FIRE TEC*CNOLOGIST FIELD SERVICES DIRECTOR :or-ante to the test standard is verified by a registered ;4;sional engineer. '1'nia ie a factual report of the results obtaii% .d laboratory tests of sample products . The results may be applied '+ , : chi pzoducts t2Etec? a�:d ,':�cu7.1 nor !-%� !cnut.rued a3 al—dli,ab'.e ar similar prodacts of the manufacturer . The HPMA does not verify the Z:iption of materials and prodycta when tha description is provided' client . The report is noe a recommendation or a disapprobation wr.iln this roport mny b<? unod for nhtaininq product bTiTT'd 0VJUGUW0 d0 X31AI70H 22:bT 88, ©S Nnf U% UU P.O. Box 1048/ 1603 Murray Avenuo Dalton, ovorgla 30722.1240/ Phono 404.278-0013 REPORT CUSTOMER: Hollytex Carpet Mille, Inc. August 4, 1967 SUBJECT; AATCC 134 - ELECTROSTATIC PROPENSITY OF CARPETS TEST CONDITIONS;• 70° F. 20% RFI OAMrLG IDEN7IPIGATtt7N BOLE' UNU_ t�KLA KV 67'HP KV SCUFF Style ` l.l— �T apt 1 H-8 1. 6 1. 8 Color - 430 Greenstone Roll No. 80013163 1 H-J 1. 5 1. 8 Pilot 30\ 0 oz. Backing - Action Sac 2 H-J 1.1 11.5 SOLE' 1. Standard Neolite 2. Standak Chrome Leather 3. UNDERLAY; Plate/A grounded metal plate approximately 3' x 4'. H-J/A standard 40 Oz. Sq, Yd, rubberized Jute/Hair cushion approximately 3' x 4'. Authurlted S,gnalur0 '4npt•'r, I�ryT *r�•rn r TC+.TNIi oF•Rui Uh I1IO1L'\ .nA i R'W II;AIY Ip1.F�n.eluuVu u0a vl tnn curton+or to nt+om 1110y alp nanrn.cnlr,Ong nlar fumrm,manl ion Iu any oVa•I\le IIW unu a)Ma a r •9• 1,.. C..r. pu' I i i. .n, Ilio, -..q. +,, iiµ p '4p,,.n i.. .In. , IU n . .•,.I „ VLiOS'd O�JdItiNF1 x x3jAj-loH TE,vT Be, OE Mir JUN-30-'88 THU 16:02 ID:BEN ELFMRN * SON MR TEL NO:6178643946 #914 P01 HQLLYTDCo DATE INIT2A?sD V• �Nh.Corp�MW wo DATE COWLRTRD CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS WALL $T 20 MOUPACTunn TEmI ....... vJT.BXTITABD LOOP MACHINE GAVOT ••--••--.... AVMOX PZLB =IC=U HI -93A LO ETITCUS M ZNOa-- + ••-••-- 7.91 . YARNPLY-----•-.._ g YARN WEIGHT»--r--•.-.,.....-.. �„ 3Q.0 OZ, 8Q. YD. TOTAL WRIMT --- 63.9 02. SQ., TD. AVERAGE DMMJTY- _••_..._...:.... ........ 4934 YARN CONTENT •• -- ANSO HP N=N PRIMARY EACICINO- •----�_ POLYPROPYLENE SECONDARY EAClawN ----------- POW ROMY XE STATIC CADtTROL- •-•— ��. ANSO H$ PIS$1; SOIL BETARDRNT---- --------�_ AN®0 HR $TREK WIDTH,- ----.....�---- 12 FLAMWILITY RATINM _ A. Usees Mathansmins Pill Taet DOC-F71-70 •E. stainer Tunnel Test/ASTM-8-84 Flame Spread SO Smoks Dsnaity 40 N.F.P.A. C1asa,,1•�,� C. Criticil Radiant Plux Teat/ASTM-E-648 Heat Flux, Watts/sq. CH.— . 58 � N.S.S. Class i STATIC RATING------ l g SMOYE DENSITY: Smoke Density Test (NHS)/ASTM-662/N.F.P.A.-258 D M, Cerrectod (DMC) Flaming 71 NenplaminS-7 g cef Srtmnlea Dapartmert Adv, !!tiaing Department Pr! Shop REV, 5/87-01166 1 Pp1: Ludu a. 6l/6'd ON?dUG Mj J0. X31J,'1-0H IZ:bl 85. OE wnr . I . -- — " 1a:• 1� 11..r_" ¢terI n11 - tCL Vumof roo.. V9c Holo rul TEST NUMBER T-6990 DATE OF TEST 8/03/1987 IX. TEST RESULTS a Test results calculated on the basis of the areas under the curves of tlameeprsad distance , temperature, and smoke density versus time are provided in the table below for calibration materials and for: carpe e Style: she , c. E��Nd 3a --------------------------------------------------Y------------- I --- - -I I Fuel I Smoke Material Description 1 Flamespread 1 Contributed I Density r r- a Y a ----------------------------- High r-r-Y-a-r -----r r a High Density Inorganic I I I Reinforced Cement Board 1 0 1 p 1 0 I I I Red Oak Flooring 1 100 1 100 1 100 I 1 1 1 1 ' T-6490 1 40 I 30 I 70 ------------------------------------------------------------------ I I i OBSERVATIONS Or TESTED SPECIMENS: Pile Consumed to 14 feet, melted to 24 feet , REMARKS : Light burning on the tunnel floor was observed during the test. 164 CONCLUSIONS : Based on one test, the flamespread, calculated according to ASTM E-64-86 , meets Class D - 75 or under flamespread. REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED BY: STEPHEN L. KAYSER RUSSELL L. CHAPMAN TIRE TECHN^LOGIST FIELD SERVICES DIRECTOR Con_ornance to the test standard is verified by a registered pro"_ossional engineer . This is a factual report of the results obtained from laboratory tests of sample products . The results may be applied only to the products tested and should not be construed as applicable t .� -= sLnila! product:: of th . m ::u: lcturo.r . The H?MA dnas not verify the dttcription of materials and products when the description is provided k7 tht siiRnt . 'Thp rarnrt is not a recommondat•ion or a disapprobation b7 the Hardwood Plywood Manufacturers Associatio:l cR the m?4torlal ur 1. W :SJu . 1 is re, c—rt moy ht a*^d !nr ohtaininq product bT!B d OXdUat*t d 4 X314110H OZivT %, 06 Nnr JUN-30-'88 THLI 16: 12 ID:BEN ELFMAN . SON MA TEL N0:6176843946 #916 P01 TEST NUMBER Independent j Textile OS25 7 .4m$ Inc. P.O. Box 1948/ 1603 Murray Avenue Dalton, Georgia 307220948/Phone 404.2764013 CUSTOMER: H011ytex Carpat Mills, Inc . August 10, 1987 SUBJECT: 8peclmens of the submitted Samples were prepared and tested in accordance with the procedures proposed by the Netlonal bureau of standards, Technical Note 709 and NFPA 258, ASTM E-662. SMOKE DENSITY TEST (NIN) Operating Conditions Irradiance: 2.6 watts/ems 0 Factor 132 Thermal Exposure: Flaming Furnaee voltage: 110 Burner Fuel: Propane Sample Description Ls5E Style: Colo►: 340 Doeskin Roll No.: 60014154 Jrlaer; Pill: Secondary Backing: Action Bac Test Results 01 N2 03 Avg. Chamber TemperstUre,%or, (Start) 95 95 95 Chamber Pressure Maintained positive, under 3" Hao Mir, Transmittance (TM), ak 4 118 St. minutes 6. 70 6.75 2. 65 5. 37 Max, Spec. Opt. Density (DM) 2 132 127 120 Clear berm,, (DO) 19 19 2 - .. DM, CORRECTED (UMC) 8D 1 113 108 103 , ' Spec. Opt Density at 1.5 min, 25 34 2B Spec, Opt. Denalty at 4,0 min. 87 127 --- 101 Time to 90% DM, minutes " 2 . 30 3 . 48 Time to OS a�0, Yt�e r)�25 _ 1 . 30 1 . 30 1_28 Autho-Iced Si natufwj INOEPEJT TEXTILE TESTING S"vipr our letter .Ons arc for the oxclusive vire of fru c,tomof in whom lrltly l"a adAniMrM,a^1!r'�"i•Cpmnun�CM,un1(Lmyalh�N"'ilq UL!0! T's nun •rcant featlH lvbhng GatylJa,the M0111 r."ra oqr PI,01-11Vw-soomvaf 0orlonw,andwoNspptyor.'e+u thls�mW^ b1r •� JUN-30—'68 THU 16: 14 ID:BEN ELFMRN * SON MR TEL N0:6178643946 ti917 P01 TEST NUMSEA Independent Txt6le 0525 t,#In$ . Tea P.O. Box 1046/ 1603 Murray Avenue Dalton, Georgia 30722-1048/ Phonn 404-275-3013 CUSTOMER: Hollytex Carpet Millsr Ino. Augutst 10r 1 SUBJECT: Specimens of the submitted samples were prepared and tested In accordance with the procedure proposed by the National Bureau of Standards, Technical Nota 706 and NFPA 258, ASTM E•662 SMOKE DENSITY TEST (NO$) Operating Condltions Irregionce: 2.6 watt0ams G Factor 132' Thermal Exposure; Non Maiming Furnace Voltage: 110 Burner Fuel: sample Description L EG4ND 3a Style: 14bullienitilmil'a ft. Color; 340 DOeekin •troll No.; 80014154 Fiber; Pile: Secondary Backing: Action Sac Test Results e1 02 N3 Avg, Chamber Temperatura,1eF. (*tan) 96 66 65 Chamber Pressure Maintained positive, under 3" HID Min. Transmittance (TM), % 2t 28 at, minutes 16100 19. 00 16. 50 17.17 Max. Spec, Opt, Density (OM) 266 197 3 2�_ 3 2 3 g. .,._� Ciser seem, (DC) 263 195 251 236 DNI, CORRECTED (DMC) l l 6 3 Spec. Opt Density at 1.6 min, 53 Spec, Opt, Density at 4.0 min, 52 4 59 Time to 00% OM, minutes 3 � 1,.L.Ug T frte to 5 = tI, Inutes 1 2 . 60 3 .00 2 .15 2 . 65 ~ Authorize Slp lure �' INDEPENIIENT -EKTILE TESTING $EFIVICC. rI 1v4N1aIt:(or:•I@o,aIor1tin..ghRiveWit.oft1'e;.,$toTeenwNWT.theyJoe AJo,IsW! Iln'nlfOrr con' 't10i!t�NNlvot��*�•�•.•.,onl�u:•. ',�a pe'•,V JI I•.CVUO�flw.tl TP,,,J Te t"no antv,vu.Inc.I,,:e�,eC^.re„Vf p.lo,w,mo•, . _ . nuvNntie iH 0= art Vq I k N 1 6T:bT BB. TEST NUMBER 0525 Independent Textile s.rv+t:.,ina P.O. Box 1948 1160 Murray Avenue Delton, Georgia 30722-1948/ Phone 404-278-3013 FaLPORT CUSTOMER: Hollytex Carpet Mills , Inc. August 10 , 1987 SUBJECT: AATCC 134 - ELECTROSTATIC PROPENSITY OF CARPET$ TEST CONDITIONS: 7o° F. 20% RH SAMPLE.I DENT)FICATI ON. SOLE' _ UNDERLAY KV STEP KV SCUFF 3a- Style — 04=604694,te 1 H-J / 2 . 6 3 .4 Color - 340 Doeskin Roll No. 80014154 1 H-J 2,4 3.1 Backing - Action Baa 2 H-J 1.8 2. 4 ti SOLE' 1, Standard Neollte 2. Standard Chrome Leather 3. UNDERLAY: Plate/A grounded metal plate approximately 3' x 4'. H•J/A standard 40 Oz. Sq. Yd. rubberized Jute/Hair Cushion approximately 3' x 41. ti — -Authorized ignat 9 INDCK:NDENT TE, ILS TESr1NG S6RVILE, INr. In.. IYIt,9p;-Aa rut"',1'I We ire 11",-1alb>rvI,ROP of 11 er1W10ln,r to whrlrp I,-,,•O.'llrllfp•Rrr.tp"(f tllr".!y'q•r.,ynq rN..:L.;�n}.'' '• •"i"n b...,!p-. nr u...1,,,M:Pry •,. i.: r. •tn.Y•GP !rtl' (OIIS!r1Ynl\'•.ql'. . .. . rgPr...., r r1 r.,.npr •1 .e. . p..; r r r oi.s•d O>WCIUW jo X31A710H 1310,T 88. e6 Nnr t JUN-30-'88 THU 16:52 ID:BEN ELFMHN » SUN MR TEL N0:6178843946 4919 FOl RESULTS ' est results calculated on the basis of the area:, under the curvets f flir• cc^pread distance , tempsrat%rre , and smoke density vrrsuc time are wn the table be;lot; for c.aiL)ratiu:i m:A:ez•ial and for : 30 r.. A1. I- ST 30 ---..... •-'-------_,---_.---._'------------------------------------------- I I Fuel I Smohe Material Description I Flemespread I Contributed 1 Der:sity -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- High Density Inorganic I ( I - P.ainforced Cement Board 1 0 i 0 1 0 I. I. Fed Oak Flooring 1 100 I 100 1 100 I I I I :-6481 1 50 I 30 I 40 I I t .- -_.---`------------------------------r-------r--------------------- '38=ZVATIONS OF TESTED SPECIMENS : Pile consumed to 91 , melted to 20 ' . ".ARKS: Hurtling on the tunnel floor was observed during the test. :0: CLUSIONS: based on one test, the flamespread, calculated according ;.o ASTM E-84-86 , mesto Class 8 - 75 or under flamespread. REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED bYt r 1 STEPHEN L. RAY SER RUSSELL L. CHAPMAN FIRE TECt'NOLOCIST FIELD SERVICES DIRECTOR _cnfornance to the test standard is verified by a registered ;_-.`. ossional engineer . ri'nie is a factual report of the results obtaia..a !r:n laboratory tests of sample products . The results may be applied -- L ;• rnt products traced and W.Ir ld no: :'.: •:cnut.rucd pis •Z,p:l�ab',P �':+ �.:_ �imiia- ps•�d�'+-t. mr !!mss• ,n.anuf as en e.+r_ The- ![PMA dpaa qec verify the NAInNAI HUHEAU DiS ANQANG9 C E RTI F I E D ✓T� LABORATORIES, Inc. K vd C�r1 PHONE:(404)2201400 • 1106 RIVEAREND DRIVE P,O. BOX2041 • DALTON.0901401A307422041 CAPPETLAP NO 0,08 REPORT OF TEST NUMBER 41660 September 29, 1987 CLIENT: Hollytex Carpet Mills, Inc. Lab. Toot No. dESO 29005 P. 0. Box 369 Anadarko OK 73005 SUBJECT: Carpet samples submitted and identified by client as listed below. Sample Test ¢� > 005 RADIANT PANEL FLAMMABILITY TEST Specimens of the sample were tested for Critical radiant flux in accordance with ASTM Teat Method 2-6481 NFPA 253 and FTM Standard 372. The value reported is the average of three specimens. Test Assemblyl Specimens were mounted on "Sterling" fiber reinforced cement board using Taylor No. 295 adhesive. •TEST RISULTS Detailed Date Are Attached Hereto Average Standard Coefficient Critical adian t'lux Deviation Of Variation 0.52 watts/sq. cm. 0.08 15.6% The sample tested meets or exceeds the requirements for NFPA Class 1. For CERTIFIED TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. i ze ,c;4lsze�nt nb •,..r'0.. or+ :. .., ..... ,,.....; ♦urq% I r-i rcnlr ern, .: I•, y.9 .nr :'•111 •rq :�rr .. .I,. •.;Ir r.r ea ...Ar r. ,r ...e,.n:_. CT/7'd 0?rdl OC[ Nt+ -40 X31A'1'IOH 81 :CT 88. 0E W1 V \ HOLLY�W DATE� INZTTATED � (�m exCarpeiMM3, DATE COMPLETED CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS L ESN 3� PRODUCT. ----------------------------- MANUFACTURING ----------- -----MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUE---------- CUT PILE MACHINE GAUGE------------ ------------ 1/10 AVERAGE PILE THICKNESS- ------------HI . 218 LOW STITCHES PER nm-------,»...... 8 , 66 YARNPLY-----------•--__-_......------- 2 PLY YARN WEIGHT---------------------- 32 . 0 08 , 6Q. YD, TOTAL WEIGHT---------------------------- 65 - 9 02 . SQ. YD. AVERAGE DENSITY---------- ------ 5204 YARN ALLIED ANSO X NYLON PRIMARY BACKING----------------------- POLYPROPYLENE , SECONDARY BACKING-------------,w------- POLYPROPYLENE STATIC CONTROL------------------------ ALLIED ANSO X FI8S3t SOIL RETARDENT-^------- --------.--. ALLIED AN60 X FIBER WIDTH-------------------------------- 12 FLAMMABILITY RATING; A. Passes Methenamine Pili Teat DOC-FP�1-70 $. Steiner Tunnel Test/ASTM-E-84 Flame Spread 40, Smoke Density 70 N.F,P.A. Clare B C. Critical Radiant Flux Test/ E-648 Heat Flux$ Watts/SQ. CM. N.B.S. Claes I STATIC RATING------ 2 . 6 SMOKE DEN31TYI Smoke Density Test (NBS)/ASTM-662/N.P.P.A.-258 D Mt Corrected (DMC) Flaming NonFleming 236 Cc: Samplis Department •. ortiv+nl; r,,,, ar�.m, at Rte'. 3%d7-91166. '.nr Shop CT/E'd 0>WC1HkJb 30 X3iA'1'1OH LTzVT 88, 06 Wnr TEST NUMBER JU�d ® ,��� Independent Txtile 0525 Ts se�wt:e,�t,c P,O. Box 191E/ 1603 Murray Avenue Dalton, Georgia 30722-1948/Phone? 404.278-3013 CUSTOMER: H011yt®x Carpet Mills? Inc, August 10, 1987 SUBJECT; Speolmona of the submitted samples were prepared and tested In 800ordanCe with the procedures proposed by the National Bureau of Standards, Technloai Note 708 and NEPA 288, ASTM E-882, SMOKE DENSITY TEST (N®S) Operating Conditions Irradiance; 2.E watts/cm, G Pastor 132 Thermal Exposure; Non Fleming Furnace Voltage•. 110 r Burner Fuel: r; 8smp10 Description — co10r: � i b . 340 Doeskin % - Ro11 No.: 80014154 Fiber; _ Pile; N CZ Secondary Backing: Action Bae ti Test Rasuha 01 02 N3 Avg, Chamber Temperature-IF, (etan) 88 05 05 Chamber Pressure Maintained positive, under 3" HID Min. Transmittance (TM), % 2% 2e et, minutes 16 . 00 19. 00 16. 50 17.17 Max, Spec, Opt: Density (OM) 266 197 254 2. 3 Clear Beam, (DC) 3 2 3 ,3 . ..,. DM, CORRECTED (DMC) 263 195 251 236 ` Spee. Opt Density at 1.5 min. 1 1 6 3 Spec. Opt. Density at 4.0 min, 5 4 59 53 Time to 90% OM, minutes .CLQ IPO toy 1 Inures Ula— 3 . ''2 58 3 .00 2 .15 2 . 65 ttArize Slg INDEPENr1ENT 'EKTIL_ TESTING SkRVICC rirod+,:far:•ba,atpr1.hnn.ci,l.Vgwqf rrooflnc l$Ip FL; nn.rthat h;1AJn,itis Ff. enstheircrrmVn: :,0:1101ny0Pn . 1 nIPWe,d.nI T.,6 q rn•I:n r.lnr nry+9. r, I a"^ 1 r lVl Ail?fell, Y 411d'!f I' Wy, . r VTi9'd ON61JUbNo 20 X311.-TION 6T:bT Be, OE Nnr TEST NUMBER Independent j Textile o s 2 5 793tServil6e,Inc. �"� P.O. BOX 1646/ 1503 Murray Avenue Dalton, Georgia 30722.1648/ Phone 4042783013 CUSTOMER: Holiytox Carpet Miller Inc . August; 10y 1987 SUBJECT: Specimens of the submitted anmples were prepared and tested In accordance with the prooeduras Proposed by the National Bureau a1 Standards, Technical Note 706 and NFPA 258,ASTM E-652. SMOKE DENSITY TEST (NDS) Operating Conditions irradlance; 2,6 watts/am' p laRtor 132 Thermal exposure: Flaming Furnace Voltage: 110 Burner Fuel; Propane Sample Description (rye Style: Colo►: 340 Doeskin Roll No.: 80014154 Flcer; Ptie; SecondaryBooking: Action Bac Test Results 01 02 03 Avg. Chamber Tempersture,Nor. (start) 95 95 g6 Chamber Pressure Maintained positive,under 311 HIO Min. Transmittance (TM), fb -],�,_ Q 11$ at, minutes 6. 70 6. 75 2. 65 5. 37 Max, Spec. Opt. Density (DM) --U-2 — 132 127 120 Clear Bean,, (DO) 13 19 19 ._ DM, CORRECTED (UMC) 89 1 113 108 103 1 Spec. Opt Density at 1.5 min, 25 3e 2B Spec. Opt, Density at 4,0 min. 7 127 107 Time to 90% DM, minutes . 202.95 2 . 30 3 .48 Time to 08 ra 0,_rnlg�t a /`, _.1. . 25 1.. 30___ 1 . 30 1 . 28 AuthO !:ed Si natursi INOEPE JT TEXTILE TESTING111SEr1VIcr Oyr lever ,Onf ClC tol tn00><dWlrf U4C G!trip o„titorrft{o whom lhdV r'rCadOnufipd, n7!h. ir:u,nnunlenr,�n!n dny Ol�rrvv p4 V4!o! �ndrr •.rtlaM rNA{IIi l...... :NIYIJfI iN... mulfl rNLCof nnr pr'Or,.,dlVn fppmv M Cyr stonwt and rpuonl 4pplyor', wthdsamps, bT/L'd 0>16W" ,40 X31A7101-1 02:bT BE, 0E Nrlr .,LII-an 00 mL lb: lU tL :CLIY LLYPIHhI n bUN PIH ILL NU:b1'(hbb4.5'J4b W-115 HUI 'TEST' NVMBER T•-6990 DATE OF TEST 8/03/1987 IX. TEST RESULTS Tett results calculated on the basis of the areas under the curves or tlameapread distance, temperature , and smoke density versus time are provided in the table below for calibration materials and for : Carpe e Style: DGiisshe ; c. E�E�p 3a --------------------------------------------------------------------- I I ruel 1 Smoke Material Description 1 Flamespread 1 Contributed I Density ------------ -------------------------------------------------------- High Density Inorganic i I I Reinforced Cement Board 1 0 I 0 1 0 I I i Red Oak Flooring 1 100 i 100 1 100 I I I 1 1 T-6490 1 40 I 30 I 70 --------------------------------------------------------------------- i 1 I OBSERVATIONS OF TESTED SPECIMENS: Pile consumed to 14 feet, melted to 24 feet . REMARKS : Light burning on the tunnel floor was observed during the test. L CONCLUSIONS : Based on one test, the flamespread, calculated according to ASTM E-84-86, meet$ Class B - 75 or under flamespread. REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED BY: STEPHEN L. KAYSER RUSSELL L. CHAPMAN FIRE TZCHNOLOC.IST FIELD SERVICES DIRECTOR Con_ormance to the test standard is verified by a registered proicssioaal engineer . This is a factual report of the results obtained from laboratory tests of sample products . The results may be applied only to the products tested and should not be construed as applirabld tj e:c,ilai products of 4` msnufao:urf-r . The HPMA dnnas not verify the dcscriptian of materials and products when the description is provided b7 th4 c1lint . ThA rwpmrt is not a recommundat•ion or a disapprobation by the Hardwood Plywood bfanufacturers Assoclation ct the mitorlul ur tl-js re;c,,vt mry ter ilm-0 fns- obtaining product bTiB'd 0>18dQe14i 4 X311.710H OZ:DT eE3, 0F. unr oo nL 1c:t!b 1L :nnfl t-r IHN '^ bUN MH ItL NL:t1 (bb464Qb 9`:�14 Pe1 V " HQLLttW DATE INITIA?&D �e PAMW C'O"w M'1t DATE COM PUM CONTRACT MCIFICATIONS WALL ST 30 NANUlAC1NO 7'EQ�TT T$xT1TttED LOOP MAmINIt AVRRAGR fILR 732208 HIS_ LOW STITCD2R8 PER *Y^v 7.21YARN PLY--.—_...-. ......... - ---.y 3 YARN WEIG81+»••••- ,._...,, 30.0 OZ. SQ. YD,. TOTAL wRicBT...•••—..—�. _..�� 63,9 07. Sq. Yp, AVTRAGi DXN XTY---•....-.....,...«..—. 4434 . YARN CONTENT-- -- -- ANSQ RP NYLON PRIMARY HAC2tINp- .- -----• -• pOLYPa08YLENZ SECONDARY HAC2UNG- ,..�... PQLXPRgPYL2sNE STATIC CONTROL----- AN$0 22F YIHER SOIL RRTARDMV:-- X80 HP FIBER WIDTH-------- _-. 12 FLAMMABILITY RATINCI A. Passes Motheramine Pill Toot DOC-P7l-70 '8. Stainer Tunnel Test/ASTM-E-84 Flame Spread SO �MS�cke Daasity 40 N.F.P.A. Claes_, .. C. Critical Radiant Flux Test/ASTM-Z-646 Heat Flux, Watts/SQ. CH.. 56 � N.H.S. Class I STATIC RATING------ 1 . 6 SMOKE DENSITY: Smoke Density Toot (NRS)/ASTM-662/N.F.P.A.-258 D Mo Correctod (DMC) Flaming 71 NonFlaminu 7 B cot Snm�Tes Department Adv-tising Department Prl Shop REV, 5/87-01166 :•i Fp:: l:u.n: tTi6 d ON2�dpHIJFi J0 X31A'IIOH I?1VT Be, OE wnr ury-3e 'ts'� ihu 16:L:h IV:bJ-H ELFMRN * SON MR TEL N0:6178843946 #913 P01 U% UU oft'��' P.O. Box 1048/1807 Murray AvenU0 DeRen. Goorgia 30722.1242 / Phono 404.278-3013 REPORT CUSTOMER: H011ytOX Carpet MillSr Inc. August 41 1987 SUBJECT; AATCC 134 - ELECTROSTATIC PROPENSITY OF CARPETS TEST CONDITIONS;• 70° F. 20% RH CAMI•LI: IDENTIFIGATION SOLE' UNUtMLAY KV bTBF KV SCUFF L,L S style - T: .�Qt 1 "`H�� ..�,...... � . 6 �J 1. 8 Color - 430 Greenatene Roll NO. 80013163 1 H-J 1.5 1 .8 pilia1 30. 0 oz• Backing - Action sac 2 H-s 1.1 1.5, SOLE" 1. Standard Neollte 2. Standafd Chrome Leather 3. UNDERLAY: Plate/A grounded metal plate approximately 3' x 4'. H-J/A standard 40 Oz. Sq, Yd, rubberized Jute/Halr cushion approximately 3' x 4'. Authurltod §gnatur0 Mnpt•-n �uVT rr•�rn r rp..T'Nl1 r'F1',n,rr IMf; , ^.UUPVu u0n of inn waomor to Mom Idey,pp nmm�una,anCl ldorr lummr.m^.:W mt lu any uV+•.r r+r Inn URu at tMl n i rl• -.1 ..,$...r.. p..' . I i ..... p:u,,, -..q.. , L4 P 'rye 4y. i, . n rT�eT d ON61JGONd JO X31A1"I0H TE;01 e0, 0e Nnr RG5LI+1'0i --it results calculated on the basis of the area:; under tho curves 1=rcnpread distance , temperature, and smoke density versus time are a :n the table 1�elos. for r.alibratir,n ma:csi.a�.:, and f.r . 30 WA 2�T 30 _..._ ------------------------------------------------------------- i ---------------------- 1 I Fuel I Smoke terial Description I Flamespread I Contributed I Density ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ h Density Inorganic 1 I 1 nforced cement board 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 . _1 ... _ 1 Oak Flooring I 100 1 100 t 100 I 1 I 1 1 481 I 50 • 1 30 i 40 I 1 I ------------------------------------ .......w.................. 'RVATIONS OF TESTED SPECIMENS: Pile -consumed to 91 , melted to 20 ' . ,RXS: Burning on the tunnel floor was observed during the test. :LUSIONS: eased on one test, the Ylamespread, calculated according ASTM E-84-86, meets Class B - 75 Or under flamespread. REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED BY: STEPHEN L. KAY SER RUSSELL L. CHAPMAN FIRE TEMNOLOGIST FIELD SERVICES DIRECTOR .:or-ance to the test standard is verified by a registered !e5sional engineer. g,ftsv is a factual report of th,s results obtai::w.i r. laboratory tests of sample products . The results may be applied t : hM. pYoducts testec? Atld .`.,Gula not ? a tCT.st.rued a3 a:i'eb?.e • : :er similpr prodiacts of the manufacturer . The HPMA does not verify the :rzription of materials and prodycts when the description is provided' :`e client . The report is noe a recommendation or a. disapprobation �n^•�� 1 . wr.{1,+ thin report m.iv I%e uord for nhtainincr prorlvct bTiTS 'd oxHuaut4u x X31A-riOH 22:45 ae, oz Nnr TUN-30-'88 THU 15:47 ID:BEN ELFMAN * SON MA TEL NO:E178843946 53910 P01 hirteppirldenk e Th.0..lr' P.O. BOX 1948 / 1503\Murrey Avonue Dalton, Georgia 30722-1048 / Phone 404.278-3013 REPORT CUSTOMER: Hollytex Carpet Mills, ince Auguot 4 , 1987 SUBJECT: Specimens of the submitted samples were prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM E-648 and/or Federal Test Method 372. NEPA 263 FLOORING!RADIANT PANEL TEST Semple Description Style; rV98 1W WALL ST. ?D Color: 430 Greenetone Roll No.: 80013163 Fiber Pile: 3 o.0 .o z Secondary taacking: Action Bao Test Asambly Mounted On Transite Testy Results 1200imen No. 1 Specimen No, 2 Specimen No.3 Critical Radiant Flux: .58 watts/omt .62 watta/cmv . 53 watts/cm, Total Burn Length: 37.0 cm. 35.0 cm. 39 .0 cm. Flame Front Out: 45,0 minutes 40. 0 minutes 47. 0 minutes Average Critical Radiant Flux: i' ' 58 watts/emr EstirnAt6tl Standard Deviation 05 watts/CM2 9U coefficient of variation �L4 A t Siy Fate,a bT/21 '6 ONadaUNti J0 X311.7lON ;7?:ei Ra, sc unr JUN-3O-'68 THU 15:42 ID:BEN ELFMAN » SON MA TEL NO:6176643946 11906 P01 EST NUM4+11`1 rc &arytcIAM P.O. Dox 1040/ 1603 Murray Avenue Dolton, Cicorgla 30722.1949/Phone 404-279-3013 CU$TOMHR; Hollytex Carpet Millar Inc. Auguat: 4r 1987 SUBJECT: Specimens of the submitted samples wore prepared and tested In accordance with the procedures proposed by the National Bureau 01 Btsndards, Technical Note 709 and NFPA 266, ASTM E-662. SMOKE DENSITY TEST (NBS) Operating Conditions Irradience: 2.9 watts/emir O Factor 132 Thermal Exposure: Flaming Furnace Voltage: 110 Sumer Fuel: Propane Sample Description Style: 99a stid"are*t WALL ST 30 Color: 430 Greenstone '- Roll NO,: 80013163 Fiber: Pile: 30. 0 oz. Secondary Seeking: Action Slaa Toot Results of 09 k3 Avg. Chamber Temperature!0F. (start) 05 96 96 Chamber Pressure Maintained positive, under 3" 1-110 Min, Transmittance (TM), % 40% 12% 279 at, minutes 9. 25 3. 00 8. 00 6. 75 Max, Spec. Opt, Density (OM) 53 122 75 83 ctoa� seam, (Dc) 8_ 20 12 13 DM. CORRECTED (DMC) 47 •102 3 .71 Soee, opt Density at 1,6 min. 22 27 33 Spee Opt, Density at 4.0 min, 43 122 67 73 Time to 20%f A' minter, 4: on_. . 2,!.4 0 4 . n 5_ 3 . 4m TimptoDs�•I/t9� i utes ( . 30� 27 � Auth 09natur IND^P, ,•FyTr; F T!:3T N0 nr;v.w:r rN wd. •.Y., arc„Y..aa.•� .�.,.d b....,,f.,....,.!IY UL .��II N!IIIY A,:d UL:.I•U Y,•.. ,m. ..�....�. ,.,n,,,. .nny rho ns, . 1. .!,M•p”'Pr!'•n„p,1/., ..o„.r.pr,•:':a^"II '.P' .,,,,....ur,r1' q,•r Lq„•�.,nnr^.rnadPYl"OP' ••u..• •^.... VT�T d O>PdHQHNd 30 K3Ll7-OH E2:bT 66, 0E Nnj 1 1 Independent NUMDEF Pendent ,0 Textile �»�s N•0, 60K140/ 1503 Murray Avenue Dolton, Georgia 30722-1848/ Phone 404278.3013 CUSTOMER: Hollytex Carpet Mills, Inc. AUVUst 4, 1987 SUBJECT: Speolmens or the submitted MOW by tha Netlonal Bureau ps} swatch fb t o and tested In acond NP o with the procedures • e hniDet Nota 1Dt!end NFpA 250, ASTM E•Bt12, SMOKE DENSITY TEST (NBS) OPerating Conditions Inadlancs; 2,8 wptb/Dmr Thermal Exposure: Non PI&Miri t3 FcDtar 132 Fumoos Voltage: 110 9 burner Fuel: "mple Description btyla: Color: 416 30Greenstorae '� Wdt i 57 Noll No.: 80013163 �Ibu: WI': 30.0 or. Secondary backing: Action Bac Tut Result$ Chamber Tomporaturamjr, o1 e2 (start) e3 Avg. Chamber Pressure 95 26 i Maintained positive, under a Min. Transmittance ('rM), rya 3" H p Ott minutes 94 39e Max. Spec, Opt. Deny !0Mali sea Clesr Beam, (DC) ) 1 6 .9 0 16.10 15 . 83 DMI CDRRECTEO (DMC) 6 187 106 Spec, Opt density tat 1.5 tnln, 1a SPeo. Opt. Density at 4.0 min, 1 179 379 1 00% Dki. 1inLlUo 48 $o 1 1 Tf�Sto q$ • t ' In4og .10. 20 9. .50 6"`-�- — 53 ('r1� tun 2. 75 0 . 3> 2. f;x� 3� Y ,2S 2.75Ariledgig ---• �'T/bT+d•ononurrn�urrnn,,..h,..nuroo,mreor�uno,r�„Ieatn„r+ro�tldye�ad..nn,A•irComT,rmtnrronrne^vwhrl,l.n„nolrnnr _ _._ oHNNQtlfJy jp X31A110H E21PT Se. n Al n H.H. Morant & Co., Inc. f 40 Beach Street ``1 MANCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS 01944 /�j�8 �� DATE-_41 ' ....... _...._.. ,...._. To (617) 526.739 sua✓Ecr � '�ll. _. p a _........._...._ __ . __ _..._..._ . _ ............ _...._.._.._... ..... ...... . . _..._ ..... > . ... ..................... ............. ... ........... ....... ................ju t�� �w OA..........n'p/......../9.7 ......................... f ... / .. ....... ...., ... ..... ......... ....... k A?l.......... �- . .... . .. ...... . , .- _ _ ... ..._...._...._ ................_ _ _ 2 � .. . SIGNED ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ NO REPLY NECESSARY ARCrin1-(,T,S )WN K FIELD REPORT AR( I1111('7 b CONSULIANI ❑ `1 �I ,11,1 1)(n UMI NI (.7111 HUD II PROILCI : jVlf IYI,] up EI[LD REPORT NO: t CON11t 4CT: � I les 4��IfvIW---1 ARC111TLCl'S I ROILCI NO: I� Holl • •) IIME Ilro,l'. if„fJI L ISI f)I (;OMI 11 1IU N � (;ONI UKMAN( E 1NI I I I ti111111UL1 I 1 -. O// _--- - \Yt)HA IN 1'Kl l( KISS ---- - ---- __ _ Vkl5 N1 Al Sll �k yz uu nwwu,N -- ------ - J41- c�a � - --- 1 0� � - - - - - I1IMSIUVIHIIY � P�', - ---------.----- � INIUKM\IIUNUCINKI( UlKlll HnIU1_ x'11 ----� -------�- - - _ _ Ile, - yam, A I IACI INION I S _ EV l HYL/ULUMI.NI 6711 AK(.IIIILCf'S I11.11) Kll'Ukl a U(;IUlllk I97L IIAlu)N • Aln:ro 1111 :\,•dl A'.0 r\N I N)I I I U I'L (11 A R 0 1111(15, 1715 NI W VOKK A41., N W. WA'JIIN(.WIq. U( ;blNlb P,9y' uI pap., '`ww/x � -^ " ~`. ^ .� � �y�U �� U��Y»��U�lF »*|x|�c/ , .^^~^ '^�^ ~, "^ " cowWL|xwr [] ^m /vv /)AI fw/ c/1 1 111.11) L] � PROILCI .~^h owl- _--'-- --- � T R VA _-__- ----------_---_------__'_--'---'------- - -- _ - .- --_-- ' _' _ ' '�- - _----� -_---_�-- ----_-_'-__-__--_'---__--------�-�-_-_--__---��- - _----- - '�-- ' -__ __---_' �--_ _-__-__-___-�_----_-���--_--_�-� - - --_--- _' _'--_-_ �_-_'_-�_------_---_-_-- -_-----_-_---------�---�_---_-- -� ' --__- -------_--_--'--�-'--____-- ��--___--��_--�--�---------'--_----_--_��--�--�__���_-�'-_--_--- -----_-_ � ------�--- -- - ----'_----� ---'�___�_ c-~ __'-''_-----�------_-__--_-__--__------__ �-� - -�-��__-��-�-'_���-- ---�-�'-___--------- --�-__-�--�_-- -�--��_�-' �;�� ----�--------�-----^�- ---�--�-'__------ ------�_ rm �* _ vvn 11/4 AIA 1, A UM N1 t.711 ARLIIIIIC (,Xl mc NLWV()RKAVI, AIA H.H. Morant & Co., Inc. 40 Beach Street MANCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS 01944 DATE TO (617) 526.7393 SUBJECT . � _ .... _ _ .SII _ . .... . - ._ _ __ ___. 1: -Q / . ...... -"� ...- ..... � �8 .._...- _...._ - _ - ._ _ .._..- - - - .._. _ _... - - .. - - 1 ...._....._.... ------- - ---._ _ _ _ ..._ . .__ _ _ _ ...._... .. .. _......_.__ _.._...__ __. __. _....._._...__ . .._..._........ ._... SIGNED .._ ...._....................... _ . LY. ❑ PLEASE REPLY NREP . .. . ..._ . ...._.. .. . ..�'LII..�!l j NECESSARY ARCHITECT'S OWNER ❑ kvioro"' + lee"Oe i Ir - HITECT ' FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT CONSULTANT ❑ "F mil AIA DOCUAfFNT 0711 I FIELD ❑ Pw_ _ � : ws4eor 1 l I`/� / PROJECT: �L,qIAII`IIj 'Or FIELD REPORT NO: Zj CONTRACT: G T I�r 4`1ee 4pk ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: .�lei DATEt�� TIME ��0 ^�'� WEATHER Y^ TEMP. RANGE I ^' EST. % OF COMPLETION D �� - CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE 1+ -1 / WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE 19w�/ 1 •• + OBSERVATIONS y ol ra � , T- - tn GL L+ n ITEMS TO VERIFY b ARE AR �0 �W Lf f - INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED No' o 5 A k Id ,a Z S Of AITACHMENTS REPORT BY: AIA DOCUMENT 6711 ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA^O © 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page of p;p;rs ARCIiIFECT'S OWNER ❑� 11HARCHITE FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT El �. CONSULTANT ❑ I � AM DOCUAIFNF G7II FIELD ❑ wly Ae-t4r.�- 11 I /1 1 ' PROJECT: " " I II J'I YI FIE%L"1D' REPORT NO: �✓� + CONTRACT: � a /I _ lam{ t ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: g DATE �' TIME ,< WEATHER �1. ,,y�. -TEMP. RANGE EST. % OF COMPLETION O CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE o ` Q ell a m OBSERVATIONS - ^�YiYt •^� hli �-. ^ p" I i I r,. Fri N ��5� w•LJ,F �,� ITEMS TO VERIFY - " w N V P a INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED e ` M ATTACHMENTS +�,�} ' . . - I IG/'• �,....�P.s''n� Q�'I 'I i.A /j.<I,Ffn �___�._ A pp.' REPORT BY: AIA DOCUMENT G711 RCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA9 © 1972 } THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 page ') of pages I SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT / 3 6.S_e s- DATE �kJiLvIM6 ht('T OFFICER'S REPORT TIME /,` 2 Z .. 1i •.ks ! CRIME OR INCIDENT 3,q,uD ?IJi(iNG- :T p APT. HOME NAME yo/2 PHONE BUS. ADDRESS PHONE " ,,,�ACTJON TAKEN CHECK BOX BELOW ARREST SS DOB SS N 008 M/V TRAFFICPARKING WARRANT ACC. FORM OUTY COURT CIVIL COMPLAINT TOW CO. OWNER SUMMONS FELONYFORM M/V TOWED NOTIFIED REG. M i,, c0. OWNER MN VIOL. JUV. CARD MIV TOWED NOTIFIED REG. N DETAILS OF CRIME OR INCIDENT - /f �vl a— IF rc-r t LLee QGC 6L4ZIei -AIL Ll d.A- orcz �svc s i � me.c x� 2 Esc n cv`c� /fie a a— ( — _ } 0 r /.✓O O'v /n I c j 7e- t4 Loga REPORTING OFFICER .t.d- CAR A nAZ SUPERVISOR 2ND OFFICER H.H. Morant & Co., Inc. 40 Beach Street MANCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS 01944 DATE TO (617739 suelECT �. _ _. ) 526- .. ,► _ - _ _ ------ . . 2 � ........ 5/plea _ . .. .... .. ..__ ..... .. ..... . ..... . ....... ..... .. . ....... _...._ ._. S/GNED . .. ..... ❑ PLEASE REPLY NO REPLY NECESSARY n ELL r�� ARCI 11-1I::CT,s OWN1K LLFILLU REPORT CONSU1.IANl IIIA OMINI (JI, IILII) ❑ 1'KU�LCI ; /I� IYLj up 1lll.0 RLI'URI NO: t CONknr_i :Gl }� rJ � I . AR011TRA'S VROJEC1 NO: UAII / �� IIML D 6Y'IAIIILK �I y1�� 1I MI'. KANI h I",I. 111 Ll)NI'I L I If IN OLA - - - - ----------- -- --- (�.f INIt1KMAN( L 1NI II I ti( I It I IlJ 1.1 I'KI11N1 AT SI1 Jk - - uu IKVAnuN - - -.----- ---.. _ - -- hl ----------- — --- -- ------- -- cl -- -- - ---- — LE _.- 1I I Mti 7 U VI K I I Y --------------------_____- -- __ _ '° rn of INII)HMV ION UK ACTION KL(I(JIKI:U ----_-- - --- ----- -- - - AIIA( IIMLNIS -- KI.I'M l I{Y: r AIA U11l UMINI G711 AH(HIILLI S MIT HII IJKI Ul IUIIIK Ill_ IUIIInN 1111 \ IN.II AN INSIIIl/1101 AK(HIII(.H, 1115 NIW YORK AVI., NW, WA5111 N1,II11V Ili :OiNIL / pdgrV ARCIIIII-CI,S (IWNIH II I rives1 E GQ . �Y� CT 1 11-LD REPORT CONS l ULIA CONSII �] �%L�►'1 AIA 00111AII.N1 (.711 IIIIU ���� I'ROICCE: I I PIELD RLPOKT NO: 2 CON IRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROM.CI NO: ger Q� IIA.I1. IIA11_-IG--�J IIMI'. HANCL (.(.INIIIKMAN(( WI III `.r Ill llllll. ( I WI IKI IN I'KU( KI Sti 111..... -- -- I'KI SI NI AI 1111 OB'd I VA I IONSSA .- -- -- b III MS IO VI KIIY 0 INIOKMAIION OR ACIION KH)111K(I) -"--"-- _ Al WiltUNIS KLI'OR I ItY: AIA -gym tN1 S I 111 • 1 011 ARCI'S IILIU HI I'l1Kl • 11 1 \:11❑f'll AN IN)Illll'fl 111 AKClil lila 1, I/15 NEW VOHK(AVI 1N LWA%HN • AIA:x1 AVI., NW, WAtit IINGII IN. 1)( , LblMlh JJJ��� IMP. ul 9 Imp,, CITY OF SALEM E�,11I_il�'df ilk f Harbormaster 3r "r 9 17 Central Street l Ay Ef 7 57 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 r9j'`nm+` Tel. 741-0098 CITY OF SAl R E F E I V E� rasa, JAMES F.CAHILL P. 0. Box 8351 HARBORMASTER T0: Mayor Anthony V. Salvo Civil Defense Director, John Smedile Pickering Wharf Marina Conservation Commission, Rebecca Curran National Maritime Historical Site Superintendent, Cynthia Pollock Building Inspector, William Munroe Assistant Harbormasters FROM: James F. Cahill, Salem Harbormaster RE: Proposed dredging extension at Shetland Properties DATE: 1 May 1987 Enclosed please find a copy of a letter sent to me from Hugh F. Mulligan, Ph.D. , Director, Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. requesting I send approval of the proposed extension to dredging permit MA-SALE-81-328 for Shetland Properties to Ms. Wendy Disch, Army Corps of Engineers. The proposal is to extend the permit until 31 December 1988. I would appreciate any comments you may have regarding the proposed extension on or before 8 May 1987 so that I may respond to Ms. Disch .in a timely fashion. Sincerely, l 7 rhe=F 1 h. 1 James . Ca it GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 27 CONGRESS STREET t SALEM, MA 01970 April 29 , 1987 (617) 745-6618 z Mr. James Cahill Salem Harbormaster P. O. Box 8351 Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Cahill: Shetland Properties is requesting an extension of its Corps of Engineers permit #MA-SALE-81-328 . The majority of the dredging for the project has been completed, however, one corner of the wall must be stabilized prior to the last portion of the dredging (and thus, the last portion of the marina construction) . Wendy Disch of the Army Corps of Engineers suggested that an extension of the December 31 , 1986 expiration date would be granted without delay upon her receipt of a letter, from you stating that you would approve such an extension. - - The purpose of this letter is therefore to respectfully request that you draft such a letter to Ms . Disch. * Shetland Properties intends to request a 2-year extension of the permit. If you have any questions regarding the project or the approval of such an extension, please feel free to contact either me or my assistant, Anne Kasprzyk at your convenience. Thank you, for your time. S' ncerely, Hugh Mulligan, Ph.D. Director HFM/jc *Ms . Wendy Disch Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch 424 Trapelo Road Waltham, MA 02254-9149 E.. " i i K /f u � / 1 + r _ JC zZ Ilk ._.._.- Permit Number PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE BEGINNING WORK APPLICATION MUST BE 'SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE, ONE SET TO BE FILED WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND ONE SET (BEARING THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) TO BE FILED WITH THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. Location, Ownership, and Detail Must be Correct, Complete and Legible. Separate Application Required for Every Sign. et— Application for Permit to Erect a Sign �9fo,y,ye ooi• Salem, Massachusetts 19 TO THE BUILDING IIISPECTOR: The undersicned 'hereby applies for a permit to Erect, Alter, _ Repair a sign on the following described building: Location and No. o z26 l.(� ,I s--s (4• Zoning/District Name of Property Owner t(U Name of S i gn Owne r CZ�� 1'.0" Address d7 If Owner is a corporate body name of responsible office p / Name of Licensed Sign Erector (�OtiAS 0 /Y)vQ$;- S!. :a,,,.: G�- ' Sal6m Address & ryLK�+e J �w� License No. 3 C y Use of Building: 1st Floor OC 3rd.-Floor 2nd Floor 4th Floor Type of Sign: �- Surface, _ Right Angles to Building, -Free Standing, Other (specify) Height: Sign Materials H Sign Dimensions aye X 4 Sign Area � �' SF Existing Signs: Surface: Sign Area SF Right Angles : Sign Area SF Free-Standing Sign Area SF Other �( Sign Area SF Signs to be Removed: Type Sign Area SF Frontage: Building ' / FT Property LS ,� FT Signature of Owne 1 S' nature of 0,.aners Authorized Re resen a ive Address 7 w of )(Lol- 7 Estimated Cost of New Work Telephone 7 l '/0U APPROVAL Signature of Property Owne ale Plan i g Department. -Superintendent o St nets H storica ommission ON REVERSE PLEASE SHOW SIGN SIZE, COLOR, LOCATION; LOCATION OF OTHER SIGNS AND BUILDING ENTRANCE. No. ............. ................. PLAN OF LOT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR Show Location of Present Structure SHOW SIGN SIZE, COLOR AND LOCATION ON BUILDING ; ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS AND and Signs LOCATION OF OTHER SIGNS AND BUILDING ENTRANCE DEMOLITIONS J - ..........................................:....CLASS ]UPILDIXG ; i LOCATION //. ... No............................. .......................:,............................ - Ward Ow-n c r.......................................................................... "oat............................................. . ........................... .. .. .. - - -- -`� , CONDITIONS - ..................................................................................... ....................................................0....: ..................... - ....................................................... ::: _I L Permit Granted I� ................................................................. 19.......... r .......................................................................:............ 1 i, �� \ � � STEP 5 IX S MECAUTIONARY i STAYEMENTS 1 OTHER HANDLING AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS iF / � � aiLE�R H ' pPQia 1��4F ' )Lv a Sl Permit Number PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE BEGINNING WORK APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE, ONE SET TO BE FILED WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND ONE SET (BEARING THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) TO BE FILED WITH THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. /-- CO"°'TatOe Location, Ownership, and Detail Must be Correct, Complete F and Legible. Separate Application Required for Every Sign. Application for Permit to Erect a Sign 9epHne�°`� Salem, Massachusetts 19 TO THE BUILDING IIISPECTOR: The undersiened hereby applies for a permit to Erect, _ Alter, — Repair a sign on the following described building: Location and No._�4v r, &A, GS / Zoning/District Name of Property Owner JDul� Gi, /9((?KC Name of Sign Owner /Vt {-(&-1.2, t9/n&._1q.LCe' tAN- Address 3-Y If Owner is a corporate body name of responsible officer Z2s Ffii Name of Licensed Sign Erector piw Mot fiF S(rrti w�RtCr Salem Address C-000H- Si SA P/A License No. �3L Use of Building: 1st Floor p( 3rd._FIoor 2nd Floor 4th-Floor Type of Sign: Surface, Right Angles to Building, __Free Standing, Other (specify) Height: Sign Materials' HflQ,O4C 0 41 P Sign Dimensioo-s Sign Area Q' SF Existing Signs: Surface: Sign Area SF Right Angles : Sign Area SF Free-Standing I I j Sign Area SF Other Sign Area SF Signs to be Removed: Type �// / Sign Area SF Frontage: Building FT Property rS."Z FT i Signature of Owner Signature /off Own errssuthorized F4presentative � s� Address a .,.�� Ile Estimated Cost of New Work Telephone APPROVA Signature of Property Owner If . C Salem Planni Department Superintendent of St-aets Historical Commission ON REVERSE PLEASE SHOW SIGN SIZE, COLOR, LOCATION; LOCATION OF OTHER SIGNS AND BUILDING ENTRANCE. Jo. ............. ................. PLAN OF LOT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR Show Location of Present Structuro SHOW SIGN SIZE, COLOR AND LOCATION ON BUILDING; ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS AND and Signs LOCATION OF OTHER SIGNS AND BUILDING ENTRANCE DEMOLITIONS ...........................................CLASS BUILDING ; i I I LOCATION -------- ;0.......................................... ......................................... , ....................................._.............WArd...................... )wncr.......................................................................... tr. -oet.............................................................................. - - --- - - - - CONDITIONS ' ..... ........................................................................ .................................................................................... - .................................................................................... ................................................................................... .................................................................................. - - - - - - - - - Permit Granted ................................................................ 14.......... ................................................................................... .f 1 a1?41 SHETLAND PROPERTIES ALAN 13 SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER �5 ® ' C SHETLAND PROPERTIES o1 CHICAGO, INC. RECEIVED 1T81elephorre: "SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS,INC. CITY OF SAL�1Ro i'1Q$ i 269 2506(Boston Line)Line) 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC, M+ RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED. (312) 736-3121 (Chicago Line) - MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617)744-0556(Salem Line) (800)225-6826(Toll Free) January 10, 1984 Mr. Joe MacDonough Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch 424 Trapelo Road Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 Dear Mr. McDonough; Thank you for your time on January 3 , 1984 . Following our conversation, this letter will provide you with information per your request regarding the modification of our plans for the development of the Shetland Harbor Trust Building as it relates to the placement of brick material on the adjacent mudflats . Please refer to NEDOD-R- 24-83-074 and Department of the Army Permission number MA-SALE- 83-040 (LOP) , City of Salem Office of Inspector of Buildings Permit Number 423 , Salem Conservation Commission Order of Conditions File Number 64-86 , Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Division of Waterways File Number 83W-001 , Permit Number 109 ,- Water Quality Certification-Waterways File Number 83W-001D. On November 22, 1983 , I met with Salem Harbormaster Mr. James Cahill to discuss the general status of our project . and more particularly our plans for the brick material which is presently being stored on the intertidal zone of the South River. Mr, Cahill expressed his appreciation of our efforts to insure safe navigation in the South River which included float: markers to indicate project work area, posting of DEQE sign identifying project, relocating brick material as close as possible to the building in a neat manner and consistently removing project related debris, and, in general, keeping the Harbormaster informed of our project schedule on a regular basis. Mr. Cahill explained that in his opinion the integrity of the tidal flats had been maintained, no navigational hazard had occurred or is likely to occur, and expecting that Shetland Properties development plans might have to be modified to postpone or not include the removal of the brick material, agreed that the integrity of the tidal flats 'A subsidiary of SHETLAND PROPERTIES.operating millions of square feet of industrial apace In the United States and Canada. ° SALEM.MASSACHUSETTS•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO.ILLINOIS•§OUTM BEND.INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTO)ONTARIO,CANADA January 10 , 1984 Page two would not be compromised if this material remained as it is presently situated. Shetland Properties hereby requests your approval to modify previous plans for the removal of brick material from the tidal flats on its property adjacent to Shetland Harbor Trust Building. It is our considered opinion that as this material is presently situated it does not pose a threat to the integrity of the intertidal zone and may even offer added stability to this area. Furthermore, no navigational hazard due to the storing of brick material has occurred from the inception gf this project to date and the possibility of a future problem is this regard is nill. Therefore, Shetland Properties requests a modification in the project plan to now include the temporary storage of this material beyond May 1 , 19.84 , which storage of material shall continue until the marina expansion project begins as in accordance with "Proposed Marina and Dredging" dated "July 10, 1980, " Department of the Army Permit Number MA-SALE-81 -328 , Application Number 24-80-411 . Shetland Properties appreciates your continued support and, at this juncture, your prompt review of this request. Please contact me at your convenience if I can provide any needed information to facilitate your processe.s . Thank you. Very truly yours , SHETLAND PROPERTIES s Peter W. Kronenberg Property Manager jm cc. City of Salem Mr. Richard McIntosh, Building Inspector Salem Conservation Commission Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Division of Waterways Mr. James Cahill Salem Harbormaster Jean Guy Martineau, City Councilor Waterways Advisory Board 77 u G. O• L . A • 0 0� T. 5- b. 1 � W J BU11.OWG r10 . A. B.G, €Tc ENTRY LETTF-Z, SHE I LAMD pi�OPEZTl ES, F • I I A . Publir _r1rVyertu �xBrfVadmen# rs��ec „f nx[Dc brCfm W . 'j �Raom 7, aitu pall List of permits issued to Shetland Industrial Park from 1962-1972 . 1962 #12 (Owner-Webster Industries, Inc . ) Enclose area in factory of fire resisting materials for storage of inflammables 2, 500. 1963 #108 (Owner-Shetland Ind.Park) Erect one story concrete block bldg, to be used for testing. 3, 500. #346 (Owner-Shetland Ind.Park) Add storage shed to present building. / 1,800, _ 1964 #75(Webster Industries) Insall reinforced concrete pad with 4 tanks thereon, 14,000 , #140 (Shetland Ind.Par, ) Erect 419 ' partition of 5/8" fire code sheet rock to divide existing area to two segments. 1, 500 , #283 (Shetland Industry) Partition enclosure 52.1x25 ' concrete blocks with exit doors, 2, 500, 1965 #12 (Shetland Ind.Park) Install new oil hydraulic passenger elevator in east end of building. 180000. #69 (Shetland Ind,Park) Install door,platform and cement steps. 700, #198 (Shetland Ind,Pa.rk) Remove existing partitions,replace install air conditioners (4th floor) 4,000, 1969 #370 (Owner E G & G) (Shetland Properties) Construct fire proof room. 500, #371 Own.er-E G & G) Erect metal shelters. 5,000, i BUILDING PTRECEIVED �Pft 5 � ou PM '12 CITY OF Sat.EN,MIASS. i 1(91 of p$Ulvl , .'a11[i2ISS�C 118Yt�S Ilublic VrapertV Pepartnind a Uilbins Department �oljn �. �u&rers 5 Proub Street INSPECTION REPORT OF 7454213 SHETLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK 29 CONGRESS STREET, SALEM 10/2/75 RE: Venetian Marble Products , Inc . 1 . Lt . Goggin explained the Fire Saftey requ:i.rements ,#-,-`t 2. Inspector Dennedy of the electrical department advised the tenant that certain electrical boxes would have to be removed from the spray booth area. 3• Asst . Bldg. Inspector Dan Mansur advised the tenant that the present egress is not acceptable . The two doors at the Ocean end of the space are not fire rated doors and do not: linvo t:ho '.required huadwnru . The door " A the opposite end of' I.11e spoco 1s on oz.coptob.Lo door, Cult the cor'r'.tdor•- 'into which :iL empties docs not hnvo rated wo1.1s or adnq"nLc head room. Both the block and shcetrock partitions have holes where pipes , etc . pass thru. These must be blocked off. There were no Exit signs visable within the area. The Inspection party consisted of : Mr. Saul Goldstein - Venetian Marble Products Inc . Mr. Huntley Smith - Shetland Industries Lt. David Gngnin - Snlem Fire Dept . Mr. Micllonl Don,nody - Suloul Electr.•.lcul, Dept . Mr. kud.+ai_ Mansur - Aayt . Bldg. Ins,pecto.r. Mr. William Munroe - Salem Bldg. Dept. � `�. � �udidic �ru�ex#g �epttr#ment IN Titu of Huhn X13. �3ofners 5 Proub e$trrrt INSPECTION REPORT OF 745-11213 SHETLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK 29 CONGRESS STREET, SALEM 10/2/75 RE: Venetian Marble Products , Inc . 1 . Lt . Goggin explained the Fire Saftey requirements - for a spray booth. 2 . Inspector Dennedy of the electrical department advised the tenant that certain electrical boxes would have to be removed from the spray booth area. 3• Asst. Bldg. Inspector Dan Mansur advised the tenant that the present egress is not acceptable. The two doors at the Ocean end of the space are not fire rated doors and do not have the required hardware . The door at the opposite end of the space is an exceptable door, but the corridor into which it empties does not have rated walls or adequate head room. Both the block and sheetrock partitions have holes where pipes , etc . pass thru. ' These must be blocked off. There were no Exit signs visable within the area. The Inspection party consisted of Mr. Saul Goldstein - Venetian Marble Products Inc . Mr. Huntley Smith - Shetland Industries Lt. David Goggin - Salem Fire Dept . Mr. Micheal Dennedy - Salem Electrical Dept . Mr. Danial Mansur - Asst . Bldg. Inspector Mr. William Munroe - Salem Bldg. Dept. QA. A,6Z_ t;�j � ubaic rayrf �jzrtxn2tlt Richard T. McIntosh One Salem Green 745-0213 June 11 , 1984 Shetland Industries Congress St. Salem, MA 01970 Attention: Peter Kronenberg RE: Lots #182, '3ap 1434 a/k/a 16 Lynch St. and Lot #210 a/k/a 13 Perkins St. Dear Mr. Kronenberg: Please be aware of the fact that the lots re'e,erced above are located in an R-3 Zoned District which does not a' low for parking lot use. That portion of the lot that has b=en used for parking cannot be enlarged or expanded. Please also be aware of the City Ordinance :chic_: prohibits anyone in the City from raising or lowering the e:dsting grade by more than two feet without first obtaining a permit from the City Engineer. Take heed of the above and act accordingly. Very truly yours, Richard T. �AcIntosh Zoning Enforce-er.t Officer RTM:bms cc: Councillor Jean-Guy Martineau PERIODIC INSPECTION INFORMATION SHEET Instructions: This information sheet is not an inspection checklist. Each time a permanent file card is typed for a new building or a new card for an old build- ing, this information sheet can be prepared by the building inspector as a work sheet from which the file card can be typed. The items of information on this sheet are identical to the items on the file card. If all the information on this sheet cannot be entered on the file card, this sheet should be filled out and not discarded, c Street and Number lyJ Name of Premises Other Licenses or Permits Required Owner of Record of Building S ate_ Address s, � Certificate to be Issued to Address /b /3.o Use Group Classification Purpose Used Public or Private Number of Stories Class of Construction Date Erected Certified Capacity (By Story or Type) - 2=�z Number of Rooms. - Hospitals, Schools, Hotels (By Story or Type) Number of Dwelling Units Per Story 'Emergency Lighting System Means of Detecting and Exti uishing Fire Fire Alarm System Number of Elevators How Heated ,( E_¢ Boiler or Other�He-a-�t-ing Appa tus p How Lighted t.,&ze _ How Ventilated Place of Assembly: Yes No Purpose Used In Which Story 2 4�,2, _ Standard Booth Instal ed Location Fixed Seating Number of Aisles and Width of Each Fire Resistance of Curtains or Draperies 414 Number of Sanitaries .4- Location 2 Number of Grade Floor Means of Egress Doorways J Number of Separate Stairways Accessible Per Story Number of Approved Independent Exitways Per Story 2 Remarks: Date Certificate Issued Date Certificate Expires Date Orders Issued Date Orders Complied Inspector Date FORM SBCC-1-74 N COMMON 1EAL'M 01' 31JAS SAO)Is. I�:Jr,i' fl. crix/Txk? -of s A L F vi 51 i, APPI ICAT'CC)\ FOR CERTIFICATE OF C\SP) CT LU\ Date 1 { Fee Required An unt� `d 0. 00 C,ij,,Y No Fee Required. In accordance with the provisions of the 'Massachusetts. State Building Code , Section .108, 15 , I hereby apply for a Certificate of Inspection for the below-named .premises located-at ' the following addressee Street and 'Number L3 s : Name of Premises ;Purpose for ldhieh Premises is sect Licenses) or Permit (s) .,Required for e Premi es by, Other. G ernmental Agencies : License or Permit' s i i Certificate , to be Issued to Address /Dq ZVo A/ f � A LYV1 O%1ner*`of Record of Building L P, ' � . Address (�a1 Al � F >S - I l 1- � Name of Present Hold-br of Certifi ate !�j 1� lkJ C : fi Name of Agent , . if any . nj iE, I . J I NATURE OF PERSON TO VHOM TITLE RTIFICATE IS ISSUED OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENT . DA E INSTRUCTIONS : 1� � �_7 'j TELEPHONE ;k 1 ) Dake check payable to : CITY OF S_4LFlt ' 2) Return :this application with your check to : SALEM BUILDING DEPARTMENT City Hall Annex, One Salem..Gxeen, Salem, lass. ii :PLEASE \OTE: 1 ) Application form with accompanying fee must be submitted for each buil or structure or part thereof to be certified. 'I 2 Application and fee must .be received before the certificate will be -is I ' 3� The building official shall be notified 1:ithin .ten ( 10) days.-'of any ch I' in the above informatio CERTIFICATC 4 E,'P.-R-A 'TO\? DATE._ �`---- PERIODIC INSPECTIO ? REPORT structions : This form is to be completed each time a periodic inspection i s made . At the time that a net. certificate is issued , a receipt indicating that . the fee has been paid will be attached to this form or this form will be stamped "PAID" prior.-.to issuing the certificate . Any changes since the last inspection are to be added to the file card of the premises. . This form should be filed by street address . Street and dumber \3 ,5- `" Name of Premises Certificate to be Issued to Address M sl� Owner of Record of Building d, Address ,3 Purpose for Which Premises Are Used Q Use Group Classification of Premises Changes Since Last Inspection (3equired on File Card) 1. 2. 3 . k . 5. 6. 0 ate Order Issued rder Issued To Address Date Violation( s )/ Corrected Remarks ✓y. e e � c� F''� I have this day inspected the above described premises , and the same conforms to the pertinent reouirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code and the rules and regulations pursuant thereto. el 2- .s/ 93 Date Building Official Certificate Number Date Certificate Issued Date Certificate Expires Recor:.mended Next Periodic Inspe=tion Date • :n?a• SBCC-4-74 FORM SBCo-5-74 CITY/TaWN OF '_ i SALEM In accordance with the Massachusetts State Building Code, Section Z08. Z5, this CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION is issued to ESSEX . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .SSOCIATES, I. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESSEX ]I prjt1B that I have inspected the. . , , , , PREMISES. , , . . , , , ,known as. . . . . . OFFICE ASSOC.. INC: ll Salem located at. . . t. City 35 Congress. :S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .in the. . . . . . . . .of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Essex , , , Commonwealth o Massachusetts. The means o egress are sufficient or the oZZowin County of. . . . . . . . . . f f 9 ff� f f g number of persons: BY STORY; . Story Capacity Story Capacity Story Capacity Story Capacity BY PLACE OF ASSEMBLY OR STRUCTURE Place of Assembly Place of Assembly or Structure Capacity Location or Structure Capacity Location „ Otflce % 25 % 2nd Floor ; . . 69-83 August 24, 1983 Change of Use Certificate Number Atte Certificate Issued Date Certificate Expires BuiZding official The building offioial shalt be notified within (ZO) days of any changes in the above information, �F Cnz of %Iem, a�siac4ussfzs RECEIVED ✓R -curb uf. '�Fp2a1 -An mnit W) -1 OCTOBER 29, 1980 CITY CLF '-;'S OFFC S?LD DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SHETLAND PROPERTIES REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 35 CONGRESS STREET A hearing on this Petition was held on October 29, 1980 with the following Board Members present: Mr. Piemonte, (Vice Chairman) , Acting Cha9_rman; Messrs. Feeherry, Hacker and Associate Member Luzinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News on October 15 and October 22, 1980 in accordance with Massa- chusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner is requesting a variance for the property at 35 Congress Street to construct a waterfront marina consisting of floats with slips to accommodate 75 boats with a car parking area to accommodate 100 vehicles. A variance is required because the site is an Industrial district where the proposed use in prohibited without a variance., The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed Marina will benefit the City of Salem by upgrading the site in question as well as the surrounding area, 2. The proposed Marina compliments both the Pickering Wharf property and the Proposed Nathanial Bowditch Park area, 3. The proposed Marina will not adversely affect parking or traffic' in the area, 4. The site is unique to the City of Salem because of its access to a channel which, when dredged, will be able to provide a safe harbor for pleasure boats. 5. :No opposition was registered to the proposed marina. On the basis of the above findings of fact, the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The area in question is a unique site which is appropriate for use as a marina.. However, the Salem Zoning Ordinance permits boat sales and service in an Industrial District but does not specifically permit the operation of a marina. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the site in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the land is located, 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not,the zoning district generally cause a special hardship to the petitioner by..preventing him from utilizing this unique property to its full potential. t �c r Tiltu of PrrarD of Appkat OCTOBER 29, 1980 - DECISION - SHETLAND INDUSTRIES . - PAGE TWO 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the petitioner on the following terms and conditions: 1. The property may be used as the site of a marina as shown on the plan provided to the Board consisting of floats with slips to accommodate 75 pleasure boats. 2. This variance is conditioned upon the maintenance of parking to accommodate 100 vehicles at the site. 3. No structures other than floats can be constructed at the site with- out prior approval by the Board. 4. This variance is further conditioned upon the execution of an agree- ment between the peititioner and the City'of Salem, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor's Office, acknowledging 'the public's right to continue to use the existing public landing, off of the Congress Street Bridge. GRANTED Anthony M. F aerry Secretary APPEAL FRC."! THIS D!3 IF 07 SHAILL CE FADE P SL 1° 'IT TO S TLOII 17 Oc' THE MASS. GENER'! LA :S. b :... SH'!L LEC 111E, f'!i _D DAYS ATTER THE NTE OF FILING .; . . .. A. PSR ?81T _ L A ..p „_ , . z . . T47 CERT- ' i F _:I FI!ED. r . r I( CRi. R£o ',,._� •': i . o;... °S '.n_: -. ":S •. �-O L , Lac tiA:.t G° THE O'ilNER " CF R_,. RID OR IS R_CRv'D A,'o 0; C;i T:i--GiG1Ed'S CCRT;FICA1: OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND THE PLANNING BOARD Wim1}1� s - �f �"cy.9Yca4" pp p{�Special Counsel WILLIAM J. TINT] CITY OF SALE 10 99 {{;'x '85 RICHARD W. STAFFORD CITY SOLICITOR �hASSACi-lUSEI'rS`j f xJs�, xatxxxz� ts i0 WASHINGTON STREET ri'T.11l�+n 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MA 01970 I �JC ]4421]2 CITY OF 51:411U JiA,SS. SALEM, MA 0I970 CITY V 744-2172 October 6, 19 80 Mr. Robert Gauthier V�� // �M1 Building Inspector City of Salem ,v n `tom One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 In re: South River Public Landing Dear Bob: Enclosed please find a most recent correspondence I received from Robert I. Lappin, President of Shetland Properties. After you have had an opportunity to review said correspondence, please contact me. I have also forwarded a copy of the above to Mr. Ralph Hobbs and Mr. James Cahill and asked them to also contact me. Sincerely, William J. Tinti WJT/dlg enclosure cc: Mr. Ralph Hobbs Mr. James Cahill SHETLAND PROPERTIES } ® 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER "?r Telephone: 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO,INC. 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS,INC. (617)4756760(Andover,Line) ! A 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC. (617)289-2506(Boston Line) 1` RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED (312)738-3121 (Chicago Line) •• ' (617)744-0556(Salem Line) , MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (800)225-6826(Toll Free) 01'.,4 October 1, 19 80 h� ;R J . Mr. William J . Tinti, Esquire +;;F City Solicitor, City of Salem 70 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: South River Public Landing y Dear Bill: a Enclosed for your consideration is a proposed agreement, to which I would appreciate your reaction. k I, Very truly yours, f T. r SHETLAND PROPERTIES c ) I i Robert I. Lappin President r- 1 d A.. enc. + r -A subsidiary of.SHETLAND PROPERTIES,operating millions of square feet of Industrial space in the United States and Canada. SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO,ILLINOIS•SOUTH BEND,INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTOI ONTARIO,CANADA iv ....� .. �'. ,r . . F. .I. t ' )�,i ,i titnt SHETLAND PROPERTIES ® 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES/ANDOVER � •' 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of CHICAGO,INC. .Telephone: r. 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of ILLINOIS,INC. (817)475-6780(Andover,Line) t 'SHETLAND PROPERTIES of INDIANA,INC. (617)289-2506(Boston Line) RUTHERFORD ROAD REALTY LIMITED _ (312)738-3121 (Chicago Line) * j MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 986,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (817)744-0558(Salam Line) (600)225-6826(Toll Free) t AGREEMENT r AGREEMENT MADE this day of 1980 between SHETLAND PROPERTIES, a Massachusetts Trust with offices at 29 Congress Street, Salem, Massachusetts, here- inafter called the "Licensor", and the CITY OF SALEM, duly incorporated, County of Essex, Massachusetts, hereinafter called the "Licensee". . h WHEREAS Shetland Properties, as Licensor, is the owner of certain property abutting the South River with right of access to said South River along the southerly bound of said South River; and WHEREAS the City of Salem, as Licensee, is the owner of a landing, with floats attached, which is located at the northwest corner of the property of Shetland Properties and which landing infringes on the property of the Licensor and, further, restricts Licensor's access to the South River; and ; WHEREAS Shetland Properties, as Licensor, inconsideration of one ($1.00) dollar and other good and valuable consideration received hereby agrees to license and make available to the City of Salem, as Licensee, that portion of its property (See Exhibit A attached) adjacent to Licensee ' s landing at the Congress Street Bridge, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Licensee 's use of the landing shall be only for ' public and general recreational purposes (exclusive of commercial fishing businesses) .,,, rAr1 2. The term of this agreement shall be on a year to year basis subject to termination by either party upon the giving of a ninety (90) day notice in writing to the .other,party. 3 . This license shall not be ,assigned or transferred or sublet in whole'or "in part. r 'A subsidiary of SHETLAND PROPERTIES,operating millions of square feet of Industrial space in the United States and Canada. SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS•ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS•CHICAGO,ILLINOIS•SOUTH BEND,INDIANA•BRAMPTON(TORONTO)ONTARIO,CANADA r— } 4. The Licensee shall indemnify and save harmless the Licensor from all loss, cost, damage . and t „ liability of any kind or nature arising from or occasioned by Licensee 's use of the property and , water rights under this license, and hereby re- leases and forever discharges the 'Licensor from any and all claims or demands for injury to persons and/or damage to property because of Licensee's said .i use. y 5 . The Licensor acknowledges that the Licensee has { affixed two (2) floats to the landing, each approx- imately ten (10) feet wide and twenty (20) feet long and agrees that they are a part of this license and Licensee agrees that no additional floats will be installed at said landing nor shall they be extended.'' 5 6. The Licensee ' s use of the property and water rights referenced herein shall at all times be subservient }; to the right of the Licensor to use the same in any manner whatsoever in connection with its present or future operations . 7 . All notices hereunder shall be deemed duly served when mailed by registered or certified mail, return " receipt requested, addressed as follows : r To Licensor : Trustees of Shetland Properties x Post,. Office Box 986 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 i To Licensee : City of Salem City Hall ' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Att : Mayor' s Office ; 3 or to such other address of which notice may pre- viously have been given in the aforesaid manner, ' J 8, The Licensor may revoke this license at any time without prior notice to the Licensee in the event of violation of the ,foregoing ,terms and conditions .' ..,-- 9 . onditions .' ..,,-9 . The Licensee agrees that it will properly maintain its public landing dock and floats attached thereto at all times and further will either provide for the removal of rubbish and trash from the area, or post a proper sign stating, to the effect, that littering j is prohibited and punishable by a fine of $ l -2- Y g r' x , - The Licensee hereby. accepts the foregoing terms and,.conditions,,4 o of this license and said. license is thereby granted. „ '• • G�r„<,',> _;` :,14 ) t " �wri 4 •n,. ! P SHETLAND PROPERTIES (Licensor) By'a President n + , k a CITY OF SALEM (Licensee) . Byi . • • 1 y 14 1 All 0 4f Aw i a 1F R1 a N i . _ a ¢: by p o I dip Sit Is 4,64 ` NER!TAGE TRUST j[ 'pOH•' • �// + /1: •�6"n . S dJ so rP S LOCUS =JS: 9.C, �RELJuS L•CEN)L N0 " B..�Llip - J ✓ IA JTpR •. 4645 - � , .,'" : , r'\ •ih�e i !'Et ` • '{ _ ,. L .�Ii . MAP 1.1 ,• `�-l: 0". _ •'! ' T` •• i ., e 1 FEET ul NORTH BASIN - y q !, + • , •• I'l'AtkThG WHARF ,.• )o �• � •` . • w'r-- e� lye wa r -•� • I OWNERI 'i' {". ... I _ y �a • - N 1 Hi TACE '..I MI S T V S ,} `i•�,..;^ �� IS ., l_ . .e ,e a •�- a ,•• °• o "1 'J-00S LILENSE NO •'r r ( • Iii•' ' EXIST fLDATS r - t PI D E 0 E' 438 " 6 , ., •� ; �(TYP.) - '� �_ ) • • ARM) ENGINEERS NO ^ t. . ., z f,, w .•- •• •• • e i �.to MA •SAIE T8.168f. 44 tic , L 'T Ep >., h qL oelf f 0 + Ln c Tc , Cr a a'PeaTeS 0 _ T L) = oJ t �2 *1 , a y.•.•., 4 "Elip, (0♦4 1•R US ELEW REF ER T00OC) ML* 44►.. q1,4 L '44T4'J.` '. . • ' _ � ¢ E 0 E DIV OF WATERWAYS DATUM �• 6yrC 1 f 'hG t ' •. . ulrY .,e•g•.q 1 e• )Je+w •wfP �. .l'\, - .1•. U. v t).11!' •1).'. v•(• -sic 5 Wo MA" ton (EXHIBIT A) s+� ', .,��- _i... . . »_.., .r. ` 'x.r' _ Pr- ..t., udwbr:.� w.,.,.swF+wtet}is.e�AywN•YeiA�e t lo R 1 f (fitg of likilem, ,Attssar4usetts Ilublic Vrapertg Bepartment $uilbing i9epartment (ane 681em Qbreen 599-745-9595 Ext. 30D Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer July 7 , 1997 Terrance Ringer 3 Maiden Lane Lynnfield, Mass . 01940 RE : .45�Shetland Dear Mr . Ringer: Let me first thank you for contacting my office with your concerns of possible State Building Code violations . On July 2 , 1997 , I conducted an inspection of 45 Congress Street, the Goodwill Industry office and work area . I also checked the State Building Code requirements of the several items that concerned you and will address them in the same order as in your letter dated June 25 , 1997 . 1 . The population is over 100 and means of egress that are in place would accommodate over 250 . 2 . The front entry doors are 36" inches wide and meet the necessary codes . 3 . This department was not aware of the workshop being occupied by multiple handicap people at the time of the permitting process . Therefore , we have informed the owners of a required handicap accessible ramp at the rear exit . 4 . The bathrooms have exhaust fans that are located at roof top, for multi-purpose use and are according to codes . 5 . I will be in contact with the Fire Chief to see if any additional fire lanes are required. 6 . Yes , an Occupancy Permit has been issued . 7 . Handicap ramps are not required to have a protected barrier per the Architectural Access Board . kl I have found the owners to be concerned and cooperative . They have committed to installing the additional ramp at the rear entrance, and to install a temporary ramp until the permanent ramp is in place for a safe means of egress . Thank you again for your concerns . Sincerely, Leo E . Tremblay Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc : Chief Robert Turner Mayor Neil Harrington c June 25, 1997 Mr. Leo Tremblay City of Salem Building Department 1 Salem Green Salem,. MA 01970 Dear Mr. Tremblay I have very strong concerns that 45 Shetland Park does not comply with the life safety code. 45 Shetland Park is a workshop run by Goodwill Industry for about 100 staff and multiple handicap people. I consider that the following areas do not comply with the life safety code for the staff and clients of the workshop. 1-1. Since the area has a population of over 50 the Assembly Occupancy Code should apply. -t-2. Front entrance door and vestibule door are not proper width units as specified in the Life Safety Code for the number of people. C1\,3. There is one other exit, however it leads to a dock area and egress to the ground with handicap persons is impossible. N. There appears to be no ventilation or exhaust in the bathrooms as required by code. 5. There is no set pattern of parking for vehicles and no identified fire lanes for fire apparatus. -K6. Has an occupancy permit been issued? t7. Handicap ramp should have protected barrier on sides so as persons cannot fall through. To summarize, I have a multiple handicap daughter that attends this workshop, and if there was ever a fire situation, egress in my opinion, under the current situation would be very difficult, if not impossible. Your cooperation in investigating this serious problem would be very much appreciated. i Sincere ( t� ''Terence Ringer 3 Maiden Lane Lynnfield, MA 01940 1 . cc:Robert Turner, Fire Chief Neil H rrington, Mayor • - 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS.AND STANDARDS MEANS OF EGRESS 1005.7 Protruding objects: A minimum headroom 780 CMR 1006.0 TYPES AND LOCATION of 80 inches (2032 mm) shall be provided for any OF MEANS OF EGRESS walking surface, including walks, halls, corridors, 1006.1 General: All approved means of egress, aisles and passageways. Structural elements, including doorways, passageways, corridors, fixtures or furnishings shall not project from either interior stairways, exterior stairways, smokeproof side more than four inches (102 mm) over any enclosures, ramps, horizontal exits, bridges, walking surface between the heights of 27(686 mm) balconies, fire escapes and combinations thereof, and 80 inches(2032 mm)above the walking surface. A free-standing object mounted on a post(s) or shall be arranged and constructed as provided for in 780 CMR. pylon(s) shall not overhang that post(s)or pylon(s) more than 12 inches (305 mm) where the lowest 1006.1 Arrangement: All required exits shall be so point of the leading edge is more than 27 inches(686 located as to be discernable with unobstructed access mm)and less than 80 inches(2032 tum)above the thereto. walking surface. Door closers and stops shall not reduce headroom to less than 78 inches(1981 into). 1006.2.1 Egress through adjoining spaces: Egress from a room or space shall not open into 1005.4 Floor surface: All floors of corridors and an adjoining or intervening room or area,except lines of means of egress shall have a slip-resistant where such adjoining room or area is accessory to surface. the area served, is not a high-hazard occupancy r _.__-...——_ _-� and provides a direct meas of egress to an exit. 1005.5 Open-sided floor areas: Guards shall be A maximum of one exit access shall be permitted located along open-sided walking surfaces CL, to pass through a kitchen, storeroom, restroom, ,'me=ar0nes and landings which are located more closet or similar space provided that passage _than 30 inches (762 nun) above the floor or grade— through such space is not the only means of below. The guards shall be constructed in access to an exit. An exit access shall not pass accordance with 780 CMR 1021.0. - through a room subject to locking. Mean of 1 Exception: Guards we not required on the egress from dwelling aruts, rooming units, e loading side of loading docks and the auditorium guestrooms and dormitory units shall not lead `side of stages and raised platforms. - through other such units,or through toilet rooms —�- — or bathrooms. 1005.6 Elevation change: Where changes in 1006.2.2 Assembly buildings: All buildings elevation exist in exit access corridors,exits or exit occupied for assembly purposes shall front on at discharge,ramps shall be used where the difference in elevation is less than 12 inches(305 mm). leas[one street al which the main entrance and exit Exception: A maximum step height of eight e mage shall be located. Where there is inches(203 mm)shall be permitted for buildings single main entrance, the entrance shall be with occupancies in Use Groups F,11,R and S at capable serving as the main exit and shall provide ann egress capacity for atd least one-half of exterior doors not required to be accessible by $21 CMR, the Rules and Regulations of the the t°titl occupant load. In addition to having Architectural Access Board; referenced in access to a main exit, each level of occupancy CMR 11,and listed in Appendix A. in Use Group shall be provided with additional eats which shall provide a meas of egress capacity for at least one-half of the total occupant 1005.7 Egress elements for air movement: Fitts load served by that level. and exil access corridors shall not be used as supply or return air ducts or plenums. 1006.2.3 Skating rinks: Places of assembly used Exceptions: for skating rinks shall not be located below the 1. The restriction on the use of the space floor nearest grade. between the corridor ceiling and the floor or 1006.2.4 Foyer and waiting spaces: The terns roof structure above as a return air plenum "foyer"shall mean an enclosed space surrounding, shall not apply where the corridor is not or in the rear o& the auditorium of a theater or required to be of 5reresistance rated other place of assembly which is completely construction or is separated from the plenum separated from the auditorium and is used as an by fireresistance rated construction or is assembly or waiting space for the occupants. In located within a dwelling unit. Use Gross A-1,a foyer, 2. This restriction shall not apply to exit P Yet.waning space x lobby access corridors located within tenant spaces shall it provided with a net lea area,exclusive that are 1,000 square feet (92 m2) or less in feet stairs or findings, of not leas than I g actress Area, feet (0.14 m� for each occupant having access thereto. The use of foyers and lobbies and other available spaces for harboring occupants until seats become available shall not encroach upon 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 173 T 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS MEANS OF EGRESS Exceptions: 1006.5.1 Roof vent increase: In buildings which 1. Stairs serving a single dwelling unit or are one story in height, equipped with automatic guestroom. heat and smoke roof vents complying with 2 Occupancies equipped throughout with an 780 CMR 922.0 and equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 780 CMR 906.2.1. 780 CMR 906.2.1,the exit access travel distance 3. The clear width of 48 inches (1219 min) limitation in Table 1006.5 for occupancies in Use between handrails is not required for exit Group F-1 or S-1 shall be increased to 400 feet stairways accessed from a horizontal exit. (122 m). 1006.5.2 Use Group A-5: Occupancies in Use 10073 Elevators: An elevator, to be considered Group A-5, where all portions of the means of pan of an accessible means of egress, shall comply egress are essentially open to the outside, shall with 780 CMR 3006.0 and standby power shall be have an exit access travel distance of not more provided in accordance with 780 CMR 2707.0. The than 400 feet (122 m), except that such elevator shall be accessed from an area of refuge occupancies in buildings and structures of Type I complying with 780 CMR 1007.5 or a horizontal or 2 construction shall not have an exit access exit. In buildings where a required accessible floor travel distance limitation. is four or more stories above or below a level of exit discharge serving that floor, at least one elevator 1006.6 Elevators, escalators and moving walks: shall be provided and shall serve as one required Elevators,escalators and moving walks shall not be accessible means of egress. accepted as a required element of the means of Exceptions: egress. 1. In buildings equipped throughout with an Exception: An elevator conforming to 780 CMR automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 1007.3 shall be permitted for an accessible means 780 CMR 906.2.1, the elevator shall not be of egress. required to serve floors which are located at or . above the level of exit discharge and provided 1006.7 Common path of travel: The common path with a horizontal exit complying with 780 CMR ofexit access travel distance for occupants to reach 1019.0. a point where two separate and distinct paths of 2. Elevators are not required to be accessed from travel are available to two exits shall not exceed 100 an area of refuge or a horizontal exit in feet(30480 mm)in occupancies in Use Group I-3. occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 780 CMR 1007.0 ACCESSIBLE MEANS 780 CMR 906.2.1. OF EGRESS 1007.1 General: ''All spaces required to be hall n Platform lifts: Platform (wheelchair) s accessible by S21 CMR,the Rules and Regulations . shall not serve as part an accessible means of of the Architectural Access Board referenced in egress except within a dwelling unit. 780 CAM 11, and listed in Appendix A shall be( 1007.5 Areas of refuge: Every required area of _.provided with not less than one accessible means of refuge shall be accessible from the space it serves by egress that complies with 780 CMR 1007.0. Where an accessible means of egress. The maximum travel , more than one means of egrets is required from any distance from any accessible space to an area of required accessible space,each accessible portion of refuge shall not exceed the travel distance permitted the space shall be served by not less than two for the occupancy in accordance with 780 CMR accessible means of egress. Each accessible means 1006.5. Every required area of refuge shall have 1 of egress shall provide a continuous path of travel direct access to an exit stairway complying with from a required accessible space to a public way 780 CMR 1007.2 or an elevator complying with which is usable by a mobility impaired person and 1 780 CMR 1007.3. Where an elevator lobby is used shall include accessible routes, ramps, exit as an area of refuge, the shaft and lobby shall stairways, elevators, horizontal exits orsmoke comply with 780 CMR 1015.0 for smokeproof barriers. enclosures except where the elevators are in an area 10072 Exit stairways: An exit stairway to be of refuge formed by a horizontal exit or smoke barrier. considered part of an accessible means of egress Exception: Areas of refuge are not required in shall have a clear width of at least 48 inches(1219 open parking structures mm)between handrails and shall either incorporate an area of refuge within an enlarged story-level 1007.5.1 Size: Each area of refuge shall be sized landing or shall be accessed from an area of refuge to accommodate one wheelchair space of 30 complying with 780 CMR 1007.5 or a horizontal inches (762 mm) by 48 inches (1219 mm) for exit. each 200 occupants or portion thereof. based on the occupant load of the area of refuge and all 217197 (Effective 2J28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 175 t I 2L } t'•. c F �--• z,�� '1' ..1•I•M �. '►�� �i '� ��" 1�1x-,I � 'ry �f 1 I1 Her - - i f _ 4.., L t c Ir l I i ri 41,>J a } O o I ; I , - ' it '10•lci[7.0 '� 2• Ili L� �' ,Zd i �1 �1 I �i N , �! � N I ~� ,..\`� � ,� � ' ' 1 _ ' w0 , av • , a � of , : E t I O../ 1 y I Alt 10 G �. n ; �•�c{-stv _ ' c -�; 4 ' 1 I � I r t � - _ _---• li 1 - - I I Ct r• •'!'o unjern-je �! �� l ( I I �_I _� '' � lr� -°>.}•i'•tld�tll"G � �r•' •1,•�P_G•t"'lo I'I• � i 1 Y I , `1 _ I i i� O , I k - n�o M��• c I c11, -_ , ll LkA ! l I � 101 �✓' I �j •p ( '.� t�l•(� V ! �i'-t' ',�I� . �.�r,1011 i'• Z" ° ^ ;r �i� ��I --x--- ----- - -- -- 1_ - . I- - ---_ _ _ ---- _ �.. - --- - --- i r O I I 1 �I .. .E _ , - � � -j-"��-��1� ;i 1 t � �• _ k � Gre�l1 !y � n.�e ��g��cC1 �I ���-� � _ail.. - �: 1J - .. t► �;�. \ XL=2 1 .1 � _.. .L. � - .... - . • p � � p . en r>- ut r r I , - 1 i II _ - �- G:II. rt;.•-2 x•11 t.k,�P � i r� - -�- ZAK KOO 1 ' r InI1-> ; _1.— � i. 1 i i O _ I I " ' i N I rel n i rr m - �I l n-f -- ' • I • --�I �1rrereno I � i i - l l - � l 11 1 11 i I' i I •^ ll+ � I � ,r �' ' 1• I '`-+• I '� ', i I �. t •o � .� i 2 ( J i -' c ` l i I I I �ti - ' d - /cll. f•-��• SII, •},,�/�'. _-..___.-. _ j � I ; - , (n ••nn •- }.��a Gln N _• : c 41 Int.r,-i h { E c� 1 , I i , l 1 � I r -+-. .- l � ! _' ., -1-I � . , .�...- 111'' t• � I ; � i i - , -a 1 _ { -- �- --- I _ � � u j �• ,_,J ' II 1 : I I I O r'" I _ i -- - -II G IOh 1 o%a< i - y - + . _ —___ - -� � {'1 ►j h `'� I r{ I � �'",�'"�'i � 1. 1, h 1 J h r�"�� _ i1 V • - _/1 -�; �, on _ - -- - -- - I 1 ' \ 444th G' !r-('�ct" o'- (tlull ;�n � ( ,� ��/e-1-IbrJl� t� -tr'� �- � G''( lJer'✓;" fnlllll�'" -L-��� � fit, = 'i 00- / ! - �'' t--* T ( .• t !-'`t I' I i+ l _ i ' i Via, S � I t - - - -- -- - _ _. _ .--- I I Ii"tE 1 E4 ! ir! i I tltllt�lll�i`� -1 � I 1. l/ j i- �� fi rro i __ •" � ` �' ` �_ �'°,?` '!° ,U•M� w� �i �t�rn� X13" (�I�J � - �—. � ; rye.._, • � '`' < 1 1.. n I M \ , r m -El / if er V_ •a�-=; Ie� F GG rriD, '�cif'/!V7� t _-t'Y? ! .'1t11GG�(� I.I _ �tT1. mac., t it , I s �I" _ K r i 1 , Ni I It i � Q d'tN1tl MI I '.10 '�OI �7rx —_ w ' O VC ( ,-7) 1 i i W/ # I si — _. --- , I o II ' � �" •+-{-Jri -���= frV ff I �' � � �lc�'^��r li I , d V t Ak Iq5 -- — _ - -- -- - --- -- -- - — Cl it ' Ali —�/ Z -a 1i� ` I . lI EIi ' lII I 1 ;Y• - / 4- ' Gt�I• �{I I tl fiJ'�L J'l dl 5l' + ��� I o it - I 1 il • Irk 2+1 I 2 , �Ij '' 2 I Il �� - I _ i I i , . IL tw 446 -- L ' I /0\007 : . t \ - j _N A re "• ; ,nl l _ M 00, - •. of - j r , 1 .. t . , , , - n ' relr rr --� _ `'n _ --/ —?. �rcfer6nG if ,,+ •-� i __� Wil. }��¢." ,, I• 'I : .; � � -_� - • � lo' � t� ' � to � � �.� • � l I ro'•�'c� � �� • � - � �'.ol �'� •�. i Id 2 r I i , : - 40 _ =O I , _ n vle - -� -- -l-t . . � _ _ 1 �I �d . V.� �Bi�Yk!.•IL::� i --_ 11 I q_ I -�.. . 1 Wit• 1 I , I F LK 21 . _ t1 j - - - L Ur ►� h � m I It (� 1 -------------- i I i - µ � .� t ..tVIA 1Ir � .44 tr I _ t I (' I A , i '� �rli'1' f n. iz 1 I - ! (/' !t�(r � I ��.li ✓!� - j II ' ">�` �e''�I�I.III. �%``Ict 11 t� . !/t-'I-��1"�� mull {_7^ ...._�; �� �� I !, l � �Gon�' rm J- 1r-ti:rv,I In -FIcLA. �I ! • III �. 1 I , .. LTIL '— APPEAL CASE GO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !` Oty of G 71L1Ir, � c�S�c�L�uSEtts -Irb of r:l( iD THE cOARD OF APPEALS: The i;odtarsigned representsthat is xax ': e c•;;cers of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . .Z9. .gcn& ess. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _t1'rat inc}yst�iel Zoninq District. . . . . . and said parcel 'Is affected by ;r-ction(s ) . . Of the Xissachusetts State Building C:;•;e. Plans d scribing the crork proposed, have been s.:!),ALted to ti:e 1!.rpector of Buildinas in aecorda^ce ,;ith `;ection IX A. 1 of tie Zcning C:•uinance. Vl per] N K d tyc x See plans attached CL o- Q_ M tu. Q >LU d LU LL ten k � o The Application for Permit was, denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The permit application has not been denied. The Board of Appeals granted to the honer/Petitioner in November, 1987 lot coverage, front setback, and parking stall design 7ariances relative to Shetland's planned construction of an accessory use parking garage Ln the Shetland Office and Industrial Park. (See variance decision copy attached.) The timer/Petitioner now seeks a six month extension of these variances pursuant to M.G.L. c.40A, 3�gc. cc., if eemet� necessary by the Board, a modification to incorporate the final building The�In�e's gne �7ierea yn'petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Building: to approve the' application fee permit to Build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would Involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief -may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose•of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: The same-seasons that the Board found for granting these variances originally in .987 (see attached decision copy) continue to exist now in support of this request. Owner. . . . . . . SheLlaud.Trust . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Address. . . . . R9. �Qngless.SS�egS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Salem, MA 01970 Telephone. . . . . . . 00) .745.4M . .. .. . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . Same.as.ownar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . . . .QSzghqr LL,. U.8.8 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% ,_ Byq 12famo� t)'uinh;. 'aqui=.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i n 5 Sav y Three copies of the application must be filed wiT� t ,e Street, $ 1 0197$ Att rneys, P PP E sa�`ecretary o �`eoard of $ r Appeals with a check„ for advertising in the arount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shit�and four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The ust Evenfn9 so 9347PGA4 ofulem, tts$tttljuoP##s z� „s 29nxrb of Append Nor 3U 2 56 PYA X81 FILE# x DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SHETL7�ND—PROPERTIES- - MASS. FOR VARIANCES AT 29 CONGRESS STREET (I) r,17Y CLERK.SplEk• sa s A hearing on this petition was held November 23, 1987 with the � .. .: • „ y :following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman;e. Messrs. , Peter Strout, Peter Dore and Arthur LabrecquNotice `$ of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General laws Chapter 40A. Esu� p+ - The petitioners, represented by co Attorney William F. Quinn, are xeguesting Variances to allow lot coverage in excess of the 45% rn W 'maximum is the Industrial District; a front yard setback from r, Minim Street o£ 15 feet, (being less than the 30 foot minimum d dimensions differentcthanathose specifnd to allow iedkingSection stall dVII gOf •rYhe .Zoning. Ordinance, and as shown on a plan. . These Variances s Would be used for the construction in two phases of a structure N t•at`29 Congress Street, said property being located in the c Industrial District (I) . The intended use of the new structure '..1z as an accessory use parking garage to service the Shetland >. Industrial Park. 'a The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: C3 and a, special conditions and circumstances exist which o Y' especially affect the land, building or structure o involved and which do not generally affect other rn lands, buildings and structures in the same district; to b, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the �A Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, ;t financial or otherwise to the petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial public detriment to the good and without nullifying or �atinrom the intent of the rtilterog oseofthe ordinance,substantially tcrhepurp s , . , The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence .'presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: r 1, on presented at the There was no Opposition to the petiti z hearings the City of Salem Planning Department, the City x Councillor for the ward in which the project i s to be _"".` located, and an abutter all spoke in favor of the proposal. - DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SHETLAND PROPERTIES FOR VARIANCES FOR " iCL,145 r. • ! 29 CONGRESS STREET, SALEM { page two ? :2. Parking in this area Is at a premium and construction of the fncility shown will greatly improve the parking'both on the . street' and in the complex. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: '{' J 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally. These special conditions include the substantial size, shape and location of the existing structures on the property; the nature of uses and tenancies at the property; the proximity and design of the existing roadway system serving the property, and the lack of alternative places where a parking garage of these dimensions could be located on site. 2. A literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner in that complete conformity with these provisions would either force the petitioner to build a garage with much less space than would be financially sound and inadequate for tenant * needs, or would lead to a significantly taller building which would be very unattractive to the nearby residential neighborhood. ' •3:` The relief requested can be granted without substantial <' detriment to the public good and without nullifying or '? substantially derogating from the intent of the district or 4 the purpose of the Ordinance, because it would serve to i improve significantly the parking on site for uses which are contemplated by Industrial District zoning. rTherefore, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted to grant the requested Variances, so as to allow the construction of each phase of the parking structure as shown on the plans of Vitols Associates as filed with the Board. variances are granted subject to the following conditions: that the petitioner. obtain a Site Plan Special Permit from +` the Planning Board, a building permit and all other required permits; 2. that the structure comply with all pertinent fire codes and regulations; Yr. .. ._ 3. that all lighting fixtures be directed downward and inward the perimeter so as to minimize affecting the `Y'I,=-, neighborhood, and 2 { - BOOK 9347P1146 *� DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SHETLAND PROPERTIES FOR VARIANCES FOR "= 29 CONGRESS STREET, SALEM <,` ::. . page three 4. structure be located no closer than fifteen (15) feet to the lot line; ti 5. existing green space be maintained and expanded. as shown on the plans and be installed as part of the construction of the first phase of the structure, :.. all under the direction of the City Planner; 6. A Certificate of Occupancy be issued. VARIANCES GRANTED j yg 7 �t 'MmesB. Hacker, Chairman ; :, A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK �,• APPEAL FRONT THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER BOB. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING + - - OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE Of THE CITY CLERK. PJRSANT TO MASS. GENERAL LA"S. CPAPTER 8%. SEC I.N 11. THE L'APIA'ICE OR SPECI, PEP,^IT GRANTED HECEIN. SH;LL N;7 T;I:E CF?ELI U:T.!L R LOrY i.T THEDE�IS.':' DC:^�'.' ;d. ;ERT• F;CATION OF THE CITY CLER-. THAT 20 DAYS HA:i ELAi:Er R'.T NO APPLAL HG,% rE:'. FEED. " • - OR THAT. If S:''! RF APPEAL HAS REGI flit. TLIA' IT H-3GEC! D!d'.!SSED OR fi�,4w 1S RECORDED IN THE S0J1H ESSEX RELMTRY Of DEEDS AND 1!.OE7.E0 UNDEC THE IiA61E OF THE OWNER OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL � t Ip `er 2Wt4IX ".1 f9 7 1 hereby ce OP t I explrad a <� from the and that, p?� ttn E ,iq.tEiti office. .. A True C ATTESTI , ,,Yylass. r��fQJM1K�9�