72 WHARF ST - BUILDING INSPECTION ' �'p ��-� t 3 3-7
���� �' s-sso o�
`� The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
� Department of Public Safety
� �� � Massachusettr State Building Code(780 CMR)
Building Permit Application for any Building other than a One-or TwaFamily Dwelling
- _ :(This�Section For„Official Use`Only);,s��"; , __ ', -
_,.
�
� � ,,, r.
6uildingPermitNumber. DateApplied �Bu�ldmgOffic�al "
SEC'TION 1:.LOCATION(Please indicate Block:N and Lot#for locations for whicfia street�address:is�not avai]atile) �� ', �
� 5+ S �'V1 O� �rbel�G I��; IJi�G ���e�,�y
No.anA Street City/To�vn Zip Code Name of Building f applicable) NF�
SECTION 2:PROPOSED WORK• •' "'
Gdition of MA State Code used�_ [f New Construction check here O or check all tha[apply in the two rows below
Existing Building� Repair❑ AI[er�tion� Addition❑ Demolitlon�"'r(Please fill outand submit Appendix"t)
Change of Use ❑ Change of Occupancy � Other ❑ Specify:
Are building plans and/or mnstruction documents being supplied as part of this perniit npplication? Yes � No ❑
fs�n Independent S[ructural Engineering Peer Review reyuired? Yes ❑ No �
6rief DescripHon of Proposed Work: 2��w va e X���-�1. IV�N- STN��-'�"+i��4 C✓ �9b
/3� ; l d �w e � �rn� �-.r ,9 cw� n�5 Td p/'uW LJ'P_� �/�w.
. . . �� _ . �
� � .
e �
� i�,a�r .� � t� .
S CTION 3t CO PLETE THIS S TION.IF EXISTING;BUILDING.UNDERGOING RENOVA ON,ADDITION,OR '
� ' � ' .� CHANGE IN USE�.OR OCCUPANCY .'. 4;� � '�' "'� � -
Check here if an�Existing Building Investigation and Evaluation is endosed(See 780 CMR 34) ❑
Existing Use Group(s): '`' ' �Prop'osed Use Group(s):
� � �� .�SECTION.4:BUILDINGHEIGHT�AND AREA:` � - � � �
. ..,, . . � . �. ...� '.��.� . ..ExisHng Proposed I
No.of Floors/Stories(include basement levels)&Area Per Floor(sq.ft.) q 2�'S� � �Z�F
"fotal Area(sq. ft.)�nd Total Height(ft.)
SECTION 5:USE GROUP(Check as applicable) ' '
� A: Assembly A-1 ❑ A-2l� Nightclub ❑ A-3 ❑ A-4❑ A-5 O B: Business � E: Educational ❑
F: Facto F-1 ❑ F2❑ H: Hi h Hazard H-1 ❑ H-2❑ H-3 ❑ H-4❑ H-5❑
I: Institutional I-1 ❑ I-2❑ I-3❑ [-�1❑ M: Mercantile 0� R: [tesidential R-1❑ R-2❑ R-3❑ R-4❑
S: Storage S-1 ❑ S-2❑ U: Utility❑ Special Use�and please describe below:
Special Use: �
SECTION 6:CONSTRUCTION TYPE(Qheckas ap licable).
Ip ❑ IB ❑ IIA ❑ IIB ❑ IIIA ❑ ❑IB ❑ IV ❑ VA O VB ❑
� - - , SECTIOY 7:S[TE INFORMAT[ON (refer to 780 CMR 111A Eor d"etails-on each item) �� �� � -� �
4Vater SupPly: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal:
Trench Permit: Debris Removal:
A trench will not be Licensed Disposal Site❑
I Public 6� Check if outside Flood Zone❑ Indicate municipal� required�or trench or specify:
Private❑ or indentify Zone: or on site system❑ Permit is enclosed❑
Railload righf-of-way: Huuds to Aif Navigation: �l:\Ffistorie Cornmis+inn R�evicw Pneess:
Not Applicable� Is Structure wi[hin airport approach area? [s their review completed?
ur Consent to 6uild enclosed❑ Yes❑ or No� Yes❑ �lo �
SECT[ON 8:CONTENT OF CERTIPICATE OF OCCUPANCY
� Edition of Code: Use Croup(s): Type of Construction: Occupant Load per Ploor.
Does che building cont�in an Sprinkler System?:u e5 Special Stipulations " �
"SECTION 9r PROFERT'Y 01NNER AUTIIOItIZAT'ION ; _!: ' �
Name and Address f Property wner
�o�etf �ctiti.� �Z�o �r�'�� �,9�t-i3��%s� d/9S�s
ne(Print) lVo.and Street � City/Town Zip
Proper Ow Contact Informatio �
� � ��-�- � ° �77_S 8"66� �aa�c�-���@ Me��.��c
Title Telephone No. (business) Telephone No. (cell) e-mail address
If applicable, the property owner hereby authorizes �
. � Name Street Address City/Town State Zip
to act on the ro er owner's behalf,in all matteis relative to work authorized b this buildin ermit a licatlon.
�� : SECT`ION10 CONSTRUCTION,CONTROL(Plea�efilloutAppendix2)� ` �- '"
�
(f buildin is less thaai 35,000 cu:�ft oF enclased s'ace and%oi ndt under Conshvetion Co�tcbl tLtien eFeck here'O'and skl �SecHon I01 -"
�101 2'e 'stered Pmfessional'ites''onsible foi Constraction Conhol". . r
-�Name (Registrant) Telephone No. e-mail address Registration Number
Street Address City/Town State Zip . Discipline Expiration Date
� 10.2GeneiulContraCton "` ' ' - ' `.'� . ' ' . �. ''-. ,.:�", . ° -
� �A�� �% D �LC • `� .. � :. .- .,
Company Name /
T��t h �TJ'�I���y�-ri� �iS ���" V � .
Name of Person Responsible for Constructlon License No. and Type if Applicable
2-0 6 JZ-� ��Q 2 � _ L „n � o/ 5 u y
Street Address ity/Town State Zip
��r -�y� a s as �7- aym �6 �s- � ;,�.1��s r,ti ��e�.�.s.r n�t-
Tele hone No. business Tele hone No. cell e-mul address
� - - SECTION ll:4VORKCRS'C(�b14'LNSATION(i ISURo1NGE�AFCID.4VIT� M�:G�.L.c.452' 625C 6 " �
A Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of Industriat Accidents must be completed and
submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit.
Is a si ned Affidavit submitted with tlds a lication? Yes❑ No O
SECTION 12t.CONSTRUCTION COSTB tiND PERMIT FEE'; :
[tem EstimatedCosts: (Labor �
and blaterials) Total Constructlon Cost(from Item 6)_$ .5��Z�0.'�
1. Building $ Building Permit Fee=Total Construction Cost x_(Insert here
2. Electrical $ � Q appropriate municipal factor)_$
. Plumbing $ (� \�
4. �techanical (HVAC) $ Note:Minimum fee=$ (mntact municipality)
5. \4echnnical Other $
Enclose check payable to
6.Total Cost $ � K (contacF municipality)and write check number here
`. SECT'ION 13t SIGNATURE OF BUILDIPIG:PERMIT APPLICANT,' '``' '
.
6y entering my name below, I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the informatlon contained in this
apyFi( tion��e a c rate to the best of my knowledgeand underst 'din . - - �
l
�
Please print and sign name Title Telephone No. Date
� Street Address � City/Town State Zip
b[unicipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval: � � . � � -
- - � � � Name � � � Date
� ��,�oNoir�.,�� CITY OF SALEM� MASSACHUSETTS
�. .� �, PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT
� ��'� 12O WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FIOOR
' ���� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01g70
�r Te�EaHorvE: 978-745-9595 Exr. 380
�`t�y�poN Fn x: 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL �
MAYOR
CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT
Project Number. Date: I 1(o Zol
Project Title� � Ow1a�9��7 � � ��
Pro;ect �ocatko�; �7 G.ut�A2F �i�`df 4•N.��.. �'1.� dt�'�D
Name of Building� ��E�t.q- �vrcp/k( n (�IGK(TN�S� ��-f
Scnpe of Project: I p�s�D✓ �t�vNtlo..� �!' �uk��j ��+t,0�.
IN ACC4RDANCE WITH SECTIQN 118.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATH BUIOING CODE, i
'�ecL�- � 'Q�su•tp�,i . MASS. REGISTRATION NO.���4q BEING A REGISTERED
PRaFESSIONAt ENGINEER HEREBY CERTIFY TNAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY
SUPERVtSED THE PREPARATION OP ALL DEStGN PI.ANS, COMPUTAT(ONS, AND
SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING:
CivU ArchitecEural � Structural Mechanicai
E����� �re Protection Other(specil'y}
FOR THE ABOVE NAMEO PROJECT ANO THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KbtOWLEDGE, SUCH
PLANS, COMPUTATIONS. AND SAECIFtCATIONS MEE'T THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE
MASSACtiUSE I'T'S STATE 6UItDING CODE, ALL ACGEPTABl.E ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND
ALL APPLICABLE LAWS FOR TF#E PROPOSED PROJECT.
I FURTHER CERtIFY THAT I 5HALL PERFORM 7HE NECESSARY PROFE5SIONAL SERVICES
AND BE PRESEN7 ON THE CaNSTRUCTiON SITE ON A REGULAR ANO PERIODIC BASIS TO
� DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDWG lN ACCORDANCE WITH THE �OCUMENTS
APPROVEO FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING
AS SPECIFIED IN SECTIaN 118.2.2.
1. Review of shop drawings, samples and aRher submitlals o1 the contracta as required by the canstruction
conVad documents as submiried for buiiding permit, and approval for contormance W ihe design concept. ,
2. Revfew and approval of the quality aontrd procedures foFall code requfred canUol materiais.
3. Spacia! architectural or engineering prolessional inspecUon oi vitical construction components raquiring
conUolled maieriala or consiruction spec�ed in the accepted engineer(ng practice slandards listed in
Appendix I.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 118.4, 1 SHALL SUBMIT PERIQOICALLY, A Pl20GRESS REPORT
TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS FO THE SUIIDING INSPECTOR UPON COMPLETION
OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPdRT AS TO E ISFACTORY COMPLETION
AND READiNESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY.-� '
Signaturo .. `,
SUI3SCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS � 7 � DAY OF`'�=�894�� a�� �
�. � !V:'
- �""� � ��—' My commission Expires: �
Notary P�blic �I� �I /� � , .
'.�
�
@
� �
F / r
� ::;r _ -;. CITY OF S�1L,E�,f, i�L-�SS�-�CHUSETI'S
E � � '' Bl;[LD�GDEP.�R"['JIE�iT
` �. � :
�• `�y,t�:' l30 1Y�.�SHINGTON S17tEET, 1�D F(,OOR
TEL (979) 7�15-9595
KI�mERI.EY D[uSCOLL F.{-`�(978) 7�10-9346
1�L�YOR 'It�osr.�s Sr.I�Exxs
DI.4ECTOA OF P�HLtC PROPERTY/BCII,DL�fG CO�DlI55IONER
Construction Debris Disposal Affidavit
(requireJ for all dc;molitiun :uid renuvation work)
In accordance with the sixth edition of the State Building Coda, 730 CMR section l l I.5
Debris, and the provisions uf ibiGL c 40, S �4;
Building Permit kk is issued with the condition that the debris resulting from
this work shall be disposcd of in a properly licensed waste disposal facility as defined by NiGL c
11 l, S I SOA.
1'he debris will be [ranspoRed by:
(name oFhuuler)
"Che debris wi11 be disposed of in :
`�C��'f� l�Uri� � S
—.�_. -►� �;o�
(name of facility)
__ ��'VNInn�S(() 1 , nCJ .
(� �_.—__�_
cSS of faCi�Ily)
siynatuJ ufpermitapplicant
I is ���—
���«
��.brc;a((,�,k
ACORD�, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE °"o;""sizo 3'
rnoouc�t 781-284-8783 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
PETER P.LATTANZI INSURANCE AGENCY ONIY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
INC. HOLDER. TXIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE FFORDED BY TME POLICIES BELOW.
166 WINTHROP AVE.
REVERE, MA 02151 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC�
�"�+"Eo iHsunean: ACE INSURANCE
RAOON 4.0
INSURERB:
JOHN JANUARIO
MSURER C:
206 JUDGE ROAD
LYNN MA 01904 INSURER�:
INSURER E'
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR TME POLICV PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY RE�UIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANV CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAV PERTAIN,TNE INSURANCE AFFORDED BV THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN�S SUBJECT TO AIA THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDRIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMRS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
MSR D POLICYNIIMBER �CYEFFECi1VE POIJCYE%PIMTION ��M�
GENERALLIABILRY FACHOCCURRENCE 5 �.00O�OOO
P' X COMMFRCIALGENERALLIABILITV G24305077 8/5/12 8/5/13 p{�MI9ES eoN¢renm =
ClA1MSMADE ❑X OCCUR MEDEXP(Myanapamon) S
PERSONRL6ADV�NJURY 5 � OOOOOO
GENQiALAGGREGATE E ?�OOO�OOO
GENlAGGREGATELIMIiAPPLIESPER: ` PROOUCTS�COMP/OPAG6 S ZOOOOOO
POLICY �O' LOC
♦UTOMOBLLELII�BILftY
COM9MEDSINGLELIMIT S
PNYNUTO (Eeaaqenp
ALLOWNEDNUTOS
BODILYINJURY s
SCNEDULEDPUTOS (Pmpersm)
HIRE�AUTOS 90DILV IW URY
NON�OWNEDAUTOS (PereaMen[) s
PROPERTYDAMAGE _
(Pxammenq
pARROELIA9W?Y AUTOONLY.EAACCI�ENT S
IWYAUTO EqqCC S
OTHERTHAN
RUTOONLY: qGG S
IXC 6RELLALWBIIJIY EqCHOCCURRENCE S
OCCUR �CUlIM9MAOE AGGRE6ATE S
E
OFDUQIBLE g
RETENTION 5 j
WCSTATU. OTH�
WORI�RSCOMPENBATIONAN� R IMITS
EMPLOYERB'�IA8ILIT'
ANVPROFRIEfORIPARTNERIEXECUTIVE
E.LEACHACCIDENT 5
OFFICERAIEMBEREXGLUDEDi ELOISEASE�EAEMPLOVEE $
Xyaa AmaOauntler ELDISEASE�POIICYLIMIT S
� SP CIALPROVISIONSOebw
OTIER
DESCRPiIOM OF OPEMTIONS ILOCATIONSI VEXIClEBIE%CWSION8ADDED BY ENWRSEMENT ISPECIAL VROVI&ONS
SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE POLICY IN FORCE BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY LISTED
1/15/13 EMAILED TO MATTHEW.MATTERA@GMAIL.COM AND JJANUARIO@COMCAST.NET
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELIATION
BHOULD N1Y OF TXE ABOVE OE8GtIBED POLICIEB BE CANCEILED BEFORE TME EJtPrtWT1pN
DATE iXEPEOF,TME 68UIN0 WBURER WILL ENOFAVOR TO MAIL �� DAVB W WTEN
MATT MATTERA ppilCE TO 1HE CEIITFILpIE MOIDER NAYED TO TXE LEFf,BUT FpRURE TO DO SO 6HALL
94 LEACH STREET pIPoSE NO OBLIWiION OR LIA91UTf OF RNY RMD UPON THE INSUqER�AGEMTS OR
SALEM MA 01970 ��y��7pm,�.
,wn�orsaeorterrsrsESExrnmre ,
�w P. C�y.��.
ACORD 25(2001108) 'ACORD CORPORATION 19B8
�� Dl.us:ichusctt� - Dcp:trtmcnt nY Public Sxfetc
� Buard of l3uiltlin_ Rc,tdations and Stantlards
Construction Supervisor License
License: CS 42068 . �
` ��
JOHN B JANUARIO .
206 JUDGE RD
LYNN, MA 01904 "..;' ��'�
�..� �y/�JE Expiration: 5/27/2013
('ummissioner - .. TdS: 74890
w�- .._. . . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . . ..
a:kuic�u�ell .
�e�am�nro�niaea�Clz o����
� Office of Cansumer Aftain&Business Regulation
- OME IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR TYPe:
C�r-� egistrat�on 110'176 Individual
XPiration 10/9/2014
��- �.,;
JOHN B JANUARIO '`
�`
_ 4_, _i_,
_ _._�.., r-_-
�.:.6:i•____ ai
� JOHN JANUARIO d ' ���� ����c_
206 JUDGE RD. _
LYNN,MA 01904 ' -� Uodersecretary
,''`°" CIT'Y OF S.1I.E�,t, l�L-1SS:ICHL"SETTS
�. .
BLu.ni.�G Deria�n�ur
�� � ' '� �+ l?O C�/.�SHQVGTON STREET, 3�D F�.00R
� �.
� T1eL (9�8} 745-9595
� F.�.Y(973) 140-98-f6
ICI�BHRI,EY DRISCOLL
1�fAYOR Trtonc�s ST.P�.axB
D[RECTOR OF PL'OLIC PROPE[lTY/BCIiD�7G COSL\IiSSIONER �
�Vurkers' Cumpensatton insurance Aftidavit: Duilders/ContractorglElectrtctans/Plumbers
A�i�iltc�nt intnrmatlon Plcase Pr1nt Lee��tv
V;11110(13usiixy.�Or�nizuia'vindividual): I���k yd L�� ^
Acldress: a'� �' �Tt�. �� 2�1
CitylStatc/Zip: LT r� � �+''DQ_ �� y�� Phone N: l0/ 7— �Y� — �6 ��
Are ynu un employer?Cheek the approprtata bois 'Pype of proJect(requlreJ):
1.� 1 am a cmploynr with 4. (] 1;un a gcn�r�l wmcactot and 1 6. ❑Naw connwction
employeca(tLll and/or paR-�ime).• hava hind�he aub.contncton
2�1 am a so�b propdctar ur purtnar• listed on ihe attached vhect 2 �•,,���modeling
.rhip and hava no cmployeea These subcontrneton havo 8. �] �emolitian
�vor&ing fur ma in any capaciry. worken'comp. insurnnca q, �Ouilding�ddition
. (No workeri'comp,insuran<e 5. Q We are a corpomtion ond ih
rcywreJ.J ofticcrs have axerciscd th�k �0.0 Elechica!repairs or addition�
3.� 1�in a homeuwner doing all work ri�ht oFexemptiun per MCL I 1.0 Plumbing repuirs or udditions
myxif.(No workcn'cump. a 132,�I(4J,and we have no �Z,Q 2aoFnpair9
insurancarayuired.Jt emplayeea.�Nowadcers' t3.(]Olhot
comp.in.vurance nquind.J
•nny applic:un�Int chix:Yt box I I must alyu fill�W iha n�aliw bclow ihawiny tha'u wvrkui�om����io���u�y;�,�,,,,,,m�.
�I Lvnumrnaa whu auhmil�hi�aflldnvit indleminy ihry aro dainy ull worl�and theq hlro uVt�ida cantmcton mual m6mll a�ww allidavil indtetiny mch
�Gm�r.w:wo�hut ch�sk ihii bua mwt anuhud:u�aJdiiiuwl�hmi shuwinQ Iho nome oti�e rub.centruto't and tholt wurYcn'comp.pultry infwmnNon.
!um an eurployar rhat tr provlding�vorkert'comprnfadan lxsurancs jai my empluyer.x Beluw 7s thi polfey und Jab s!U
ii�jor�nuliom
In.ur�ncc Compuny Name:
Yulicy A ur Self-i�u. Lic. N: Eapiration Date: '
lub Site AdJresa: CirylStatr/Zip;
,\ttnch a cupy uf thB�rorkera'compensatlou poliey declarattan pag�(�howing Iha policy num6er and azplra�lon datej.
Failury to sccum cova�ga yv rcquired unJcr Scc�ion 2SA uC 4(GL e. I52 can Irad to ihe impavition of criminal penaltiaa af a
rine up to SI,SUO.UO unJ/ar one-yeoe imprisonmcn4 a�well as civil puna[Hea ia tha fann uf a STOp WORK ORDER nnJ n tina
nf up m 5?30.00 a Juy agyns�iha viularor. 13e aJvixuJ ehat a copy uf ihis stuement may lw furwardcd to�he Oftic�of
Invcsligulivav��f Ihe D1A fur insuranca coverage v¢dlicaliun.
- /du hrrrby rrnlfy«ader r6u puln.r uuJ prua/tlra u/prr/ury dmt�hi injunnu!!au pravidrJ ub v�ir�rua mrJ corrrct
ii��muure: S�th�l�L� :�� I)utu: ��iS�/.j
e �,�,�: � �o��- d y�- ���-s'
It)JJicrv!use w�ly. Da na1 rviile in�/dr unq m bs cuarplelad by crty ui Iowe n/fIclut
City ar'1'uwn: ---..._ Pcrmitli.lceme x -- -____---- �
Issuinq,\W Iwri�y(circla une):
1. Uua�J uC Ile�Uh 2. OuilJin�;Ocpnrtmout .1.City/fown Clerk J. Gleetrital Iuspectur 5. Plumbfnk Inepectar
6.Oihcr
. CuNacl Person: ._ . . . __.... ._ Phon¢M•
� - � - - - - . . . . . _ _ _ . . . _.
�,
NETCO Construction Management Co.
Project: Salem City Hall Roof Replacement and Masonry Repairs Project
Day: Monday Date: February 11, 2013
Weather: Cloudy and overcast with first snow,then sleet and rain showers temp 25 degrees at 7:30am
warmed to mid 30's by noon snow over 2'-0" deep on the roof
NETCO Personnel: David Dallaire Clerk of Work
Arrived to one man waiting for City Hall to open then Mark Sr. and Jr. arrived and parked in the Mayors
spot. Had them move. Requested that EPB increase the screw length where diagonal bracing installed,
went from 4" to 6".Sent off some E-mail about the Changes and not confirmed as accepted, yet. Spoke
to Architect about wrapping up roofing and sent an e-mail note with my punch list. Met with Jeff Reese
in the space around 2:30. Architect sent off a punch list walk through notice around 5 pm. Went up
onto scaffold to observe snow accumulation in am.
General Contractor: Eagle Point Builders
Principal Mark Sr. field measuring for channel iron support and some coordination
Carpenter Foreman Dan furring wall for ledger at stairwell and started to install at stair well needed
to loosen shielded cable from attic area and cut more studs attended structural walkthrough with Clerk
and Jeff Reese
Laborer Mark Jr. Shimming beam to replace drywall, screwing ledger lok screws at ledger
Carpenter/IW Alex arrived after 10 am worked on layout for the steel channel support trimmer at the
Storage room
Sub Contractors: None this day
Consultants/ Engineers: McGinley Kalsow+Assoc.
Email responded to Wendall regarding the changes.John Hecker called to discuss issues with the project
and catch up with progress made.
Structures North
Structural Engineer Jeff Reese agreed to a site visit at 2:30 pm to look at trimmers and other
structural issues looked at installed trimmers, ledgers, purlins, and discussed the steel seismic clips and
potentialto eliminate 4"X4" blocking
Owner Personnel: Mike Lutzrykowski discussed issues regarding project
Activities/description: Worked on furring the wood beam that had been stripped and supposed to be
sandwiched with channels. Shimmed below ledger over stairwell to provide solid bearing for new ledger
and installed this. Worked on fabricating the proposed channel iron support in the storage room.
Comments: Took until around 1 pm to get any kind of response from EPB office, they resubmitted the
Pay Req., no word on acceptance of CO terms. Had some discussion with John Hecker regarding
releasing Stanley from roofing obligations.Told him we are substantially complete. He responded in
writing later.
CHANGE ORDER OWNER ❑
ARCHITECT ❑
� CONTRACTOR ❑
FIELD ❑
AIA Document G701 OTHER ❑
PROJECT: CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1
Salem City Hall DATE: 02/08/2013
93 washington Street ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1635.00
Salem, MA 01970 CONTRACTDATE: 12/27/2012
TO CONTRACTOR: (Executed O1/10/2013)
EaglePoint Builders, Inc.
54 Burnham Street CONTRACTFOR:
Belmont, MA 02478 Roof Replacement & Masonry Repairs
The Contract is changed as follows:
To address concealed structural conditions and remove the steel
cabinet located in the vault, the following PCOs are approved:
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 and 13 for the sum of: $ 18,052.00
Reframe ceiling in Stair #310. $ 500.00
$ 18,552.00
To accommodate the work listed above, the contract period is extended to March 28, 2013.
The Contractor has agreed to sta£f the projeci with a minimum of 3 workmen, 5 days per
week until the project is completed unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City.
Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor
The original(Contract Sum) was $64,600.00
Ne[change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 0.00
The(Con�rac�Sum) prior to this Change Order was $64,600.00
The(Con�rac�Sum) will be(increased)(�esrease�
(uashaaQed}by this Change Order in the amouN of . $ 18,552.00
� The new(Coniract Sum) including Ihis Change Order will be $83,152.00
� The Contrec�Time will be(increased)(desrease�(aasUaaryeA)by( 17 )days.
The date of Subs�antial Comple�ion as of the date of Ihis Change Order therefore is MARCH 28, 2013
. NOTE:T�is summary tloes not reilect changes in roe convad sum. Gonvect Time or Guarameea Mawimum Pnce wM1ich have bean authorizetl Ey Gonsnuction Change�Irec�ive.
McGinley Kalsow & Associates EaglePoint Builders, Inc. City of Salem
� Architect Contractor Owner
324 Broadway, PO Box 45248 54 Burnham Street 93 Washington Street
Somerville, MA 02145 Belmont MA 02478 Salem, MA 01970
Address Address Addres
BY BY BY � �^' � ^
DATE DATE DATE �I 7 � l�
Y
��
AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • 1987 EDITION •OO AIA OO 1987 •THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735
NEW YORKAVENUE., N.W.,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-5292 G701-1987
NETCO Construction Management Co.
Project: Salem City Hall Roof Replacement and Reinforcement Project
Day: Friday Date: February 8, 2013
Weather: Mostly cloudy and overcast around 30 degrees at 7 30 am began to snow around 10 am with
increasing winds Major Nor'easter/Blizzard expected next 24 hrs.
NETCO Personnel: David Dallaire Clerk of Work
Arrived to find 2 men already working on site planning to install the first trimmer in 305 west side.
Attended the meeting with EPB Architect and owner who left after about 20 minutes. EPB came in for
the meeting with President who seemed relatively reasonable. Wendal doing the presentation. Made
, them an offer including reframing the stairway.
General Contractor: Stanley Roofing Company
No one on site this day pretty much done
Eaglepoint Builders
Mark Sr. and wife came to the meeting without the revised Schedule of Values and determined to
resolve PCO's Left with a better feeling than arriving
Carpenter Foreman Dan on site working with 1 man early
Carpenter Alex working on Dan's direction installed 3 trimmers
Consultants: McGinley Kalsow and Associates.
Wendall filling in forJohn Hecker on site today to chair meeting also reviewed the change proposals and
schedule. Agreed to present an offer to the owner after the meeting and made up a change order and
sent over around noon
Owner Personnel: Mike Lutrzykowski attended the meeting for 1�` %: hour.
Whitney Haskell Purchasing Also attended the meeting had to leave at 8:30 am also.
Activities/description: Installed 3 trimmers one at 305 west side and both sides at 303. Had meeting for
over 1 hour, City left at 8:30. Arch presented case to City Bldg. Dept. after the meeting. Called for dates
before noon, presented CO shortly after noon.
Comments: Remarkably easy to install trimmers. Called Structures North to evaluate but no response
before noon. Architect eager to make a deal and get on with completion. Mentioned that I do not want
to offer extending time March 8, 2013. Overuled.
.
McGinley Kalsow
. & Associates, Inc.
� � ARCHITECTS&PAESEAVATION PIANNERS
MEETING MINUTES—NO. 6
Project: Salem City Hall
Roof Reinforcing &Related Repairs Contracf
Salem,MA
Date of Meeting: February 1,2013
Attendees: Mike Lutrzykowski,Assistant Building Inspector,City of Salem (SBD)
Mark Moroso Sr.,Eaglepoint Builders (EPB) (Part-time)
Tom Kondel,NETCO
Dave Dallaire,NETCO
John Hecker—MK&A
Distribution: All Attendees,Whitney Haskell,Dave Lager,Wendall Kalsow
Meetin Summa
Item Date Subject Responsi
-bility
Old Business:
, 3.1 1/18/2013 Project Schedule & Submittals
• Certified Payroll records are to be sent to Dave Dallaire EPB
• Schedule of Values needs to be subrnitted; will be sent out Record
later today 'gy �.��-►T�X+-� 2� �t�I 3
Schedule of Values was submitted with structural Record
submittal package on 1-7-20I3; this document needs to be
revised to more clearly reflect the actual scope of the
project
1-18-2013:EPB to submit revised Schedule of Values and Record
a Project Schedule as soon as is possible
02-01-2013:EPB submitted revised Schedule of Values Record
as part of Application for Payment dated 01/3l/l3
Record
• Whitney has received Certificate of Insurance EPB
• EPB projects completion of the project within 3 weeks
324 Broadway • PO Box qgzqS • Somerville,MA ou4g • 6i9-6zg-89m • Fax 6iy-625-8902
McGinley Kalsow&Associates,Inc.
New Business:
4.1 1/18/2013 Current Payment Application
• Re-submit Payment Application using figures from revised Record
Schedule of Values
• Show authorized CCD cost in Change Order location on Record
front of form
I-I8-2013:ResubmitPaymentApplic¢tion with CCD Record
shown in Change Order location
Record
02-OI-2013:App[ication for Payment submitted
4.2 1/18/2013 RFI#1 StructuralIssues (Structures North)
• The new ledger being installed in Storage Room#307 has Record
multiple BX electrical cables located directly behind the
proposed ledger location.
Structures North recommends relocating the BX cable to Record
a lower position on the wa[l that does not conflict with the
new ledger location; see attached sketch from Structures
North
Use electrical unit price amount for relocation of BX Record
cable
1-18-2013: City of Salem authorized payment for 4 hours Record
of a carpenter's time to do this work
• EPB requested feedback from SNCE regarding placement Record
of wall ties on sides of some roof trusses (Detail 1/S-5)
SNCE requests EPB to supply sketch of proposed detail to Record
SNCE for review
43 1/18/2013 RFI#1 Issue Concerning Storage Shelving in Room#307
• It is recommended that the City authorize a CCD for EPB Record
to remove and reinstall the current built-in shelving thah is
impeding the installation of the new ledger beam duectly
above.
City of Sa[em has aurhorized one hour of carpenter's time Record
, to remove and reinstall the shelving
324 Broadway • PO Box 45248 • Somerville,MA ozi45 • 6i9-625-$9oi • Fa�c 6i9-625-S9o2 Q
Y • `
McGinley Kalsow&Associates,Inc.
4.4 1/18/2013 Structural Issue Site Visit by SNCE
• John Wathne & Jeff Reese will review EPB structural Record
issues on-site at 11:00 am on Monday with EPB and
NETCO.
4S 1/18/2013 Summary List of Structural Issues
• John Hecker is to create a master list of all EPB structural Record
issues after walking project with EPB and NETCO after
the meeting; list will be basis for walk-thru with SNCE on
Monda ,Janu 28,2013,at 11 am
4.6 1/18/2013 Preparation of PCO for Structural Issues
• EPB to prepaze list of PCO additions and deductions; Record
PCO's and CCD's will then be rolled into one Change
Order,prepared by MK&A
4.7 1/18/2013 NETCO Substitute for Dave Lager
• Dave Lager will not be able to attend the next meeting; Record
Tom Kondel will be substitutin for him.
4.8 1/18/2013 3'"Floor Dust Control at Stairs
• The plastic closure at the stairs to the 3rd floor must be EPB
properly closed upon entering and exiting,to control dust
migration to the floors below
4.9 1/18/2013 Project Schedule
• Once the current PCO/CCD issues aze resolved, a new EPB
Project Schedule is re uired from EPB
4.10 1/18/2013 Electrical Unit Prices
• The electrician has used 14 hours of the allocated 60 hours EPB
5.1 2/1/2013 Material Delivery
• The City and EPB agreed that Material can be brought EPB
through the public corridors between 7:00 am and 8:00 am
on Tuesday, 2/5/2013.
Next Meeting: Tuesday,February 5,at 3:00 pm to review schedule,PCOs,need for more
manpower and delivery of material
Next Regular Meeting: Friday,February 8,2013,at 8:00 am
, Please review minutes. These minutes are accepted as accurate and complete unless corrections
and/or additions are received within 48 hours of issue.
- 324 Broadway • PO Box qgz48 • Somerville,� on4g • 6i7-6zg-89oi • Farz 6i9-b2g-S9o2 3
McGinley Kalsow
. , & Assoc�ates> inC.
� ARCHI7ECTS&PRESEftVAT10N PLANNERS
Eaglepoint PCO Summary
February 7,2013
EPB Amount MKA/NETCO Comments
PCO # Submitted($) Recommendation
� ?Q zo�0��9 �te�
,
No significant change in quantity of
2 6,719.49 Proposed $860 material need on 3rd fl. Voluntary change to
compensate for boom truck delivery
Q 89.02 credit Accepted credit of$89.02
� 66.24 credit Accepted credit of$6624
5 1,547.59 Proposed $855.72 Est.4 hrs. carpenter& 4 hrs. laborer
additional
6 456.07 Proposed $377.50 No laborer required
7 3,660.11 Proposed $3,660.11
7,381.76 Not-to-Exceed $7,381.76
� '�,'-.-�-�� #e,jeetec�
Est. 16 hrs. carpenter& 16 hrs. laborer
� 5,507.09 Not-to-Exceed $3,390.02 additional
11 84339 Proposed $465.89 Est.4 hrs. additional
�2 6,521.51 Not-to-Exceed $6,521.5]
13 6�04.26 credit Accepted credit of$6�04.26
TOTAL $26,177.49 $17,052.99
� dh ,��,�.p�,-d� ,�n�,�,
�, (=1 o r '—C'_o �x c�u.��
� '-�`x'�'��
G�,�� u�- � � c��� '�o�.,,�� �,�
r��.�,�c�-,�.-�._ ��- ��/ `�' Go Gf,l,.u«
3zq Broadway • PO Box 45z48 • Somerville,MA o214g • 61y-625-$9oi • Fa�c 6i�-6z5-$9o2
Michael Lutrzykowski
From: Michael Lutrzykowski
Sent: Friday, February Ol, 2013 3:44 AM
To: Michael Lutrzykowski
Subject: Clerk
Hours in City Hall
Not an Employee
No walking around in socks
No off color-sexul jokes
No swearing
No direct contact with dan etc
Direction of communications
Buying of materials
No work
Not your permit
No Csl license
No going on roof OSHA
When calling leave message
Sent on the Sprint� Now Network from my BlackBerry�
1
Michael Lutrzykowski
From: Michael Lutrzykowski
Sent: Friday, February Ol, 2013 4:07 AM
To: Michael Lutrzykowski
Subject: Re: Clerk
ere is s re m
e een done
ution
e ee
�re ar��g+reff-sfrE*EFs
o ing up project
City 1 1-2 meeting IVlonday
�
�'[�Sttay'rrrQe'tit hahsw��
ing a ittle '
y mo s age
ca path points
• ers n
City will have directive at end of question or end o meeting Meeting adjorened you may continue Tom observer
------Original Message------
From: Michael Lutrzykowski
To: Michael Lutrzykowski .
ReplyTo: Michael Lutrzykowski
Subject: Clerk
Sent: Feb 1, 2013 3:44 AM
Hours in City Hall
^ Not an Employee
No walking around in socks
No off color-sexul jokes
No swearing
No direct contact with dan etc
Direction of communications
Buying of materials
No work
Not your permit
No Csl license
No going on roof OSHA
When calling leave message
Sent on the Sprint° Now Network from my BlackBerry° Sent on the Sprint° Now Network from my BlackBerry°
i
ItMY.SHVKt,GUIHtHUtFt.Lt�-INNEW � 0�
C � TRIMMER,&RECONNECT HEADER W! Scew�Tsaz�
SIMPSON BEAM HGR
� BORIC ACI� TREAT ALL TRUSS ENOS WHERE iR1/55
�� ,a� FEMFORCE EXIST PURLIN BEAMS: � BEARS ON MASONRY E%7. WALLS, NP. 6 TRUSSES, _
o `" SIS7ER EA. BEAM VI/ (2)-MC10x 4 SiL TOiAL OF 24 LOC (2 ENDS PER TRUSS, 2 CHORDS
SEE GN-# SHEETS J S � CHANNELS, ONE EA. SIOE OF EF�BEAM, `�y �
FOR GENERAL NOTES �� J FULL LENGTH. fASTEN W/a�"7HRU-BOL75 EX67NC)0 ERSIZEDCA90NRY POCKEBOR70 FUID �N70
(� � SiAGCEREO UP & DN �/76 O.C. A7 COWMNS SAiURATE EXPOSED WOOD SURFACES. A7 i0P CHOROS, ,
k� PROVIDE FULL HEIGHT/I�x5� WL CLEA75 A SPRAY BORIC ACIO AROUND EXI571NC FRAMING TO ��
�N S � EA. SIDE i0 SUPP0.RT NEW 57L CHANNELS �i FULLY SA7URAiE ALL EXPOSEO SURFACES. SEE SHEET GN-4.
`h '� �
EAST YlINC � �J � WES7 WING
Nor[ "c', iva. cnsr wiNc x� �' + �,1 . 1.75x 9.5 LVL
SEE NOTE °A� SEE N07E "A�� � h — tYIITlm2�slstef EXIST. 6�x6�/
M PURLINS, NP.
I / fulllength i
��j= = :•��u .� __ •i—.� � /. /% i ' // , / O/ ;O /
> /
_ � ' /
g I � • 1�IS � �—— - ,�.� f �' Nme e". * ,�� �, nore* �, ',�; � �
� i � � � � � (� � �� ; � � '- - I -- � ���- - � �
�— m �� ��; i N i m � v v�� � m, � Cy
� j '/ /� _ � �'. RR-2 � CJ_1 BELO . ..... .� I II¢��� ��. �I� �'I '"'��. � =I'�"—� � ��
a .. _... � T� �. �-- „ � I !1�. �� �, � ,_�.� RB-6 �,' _ � � I
z / �/ �
a / / � /
I
LE�GER, SEE - I
KS-IO-22-12-Ot �/ _'—__ M � � BW-In I I�; �� � � - � I� � � � Cz .. , ��
..�. . __ � � �� � I I _j _ O.
; __�—I � --- ^�Ir � �_� ��J — -- —�J- T�— � _ �
< I �
E j I�I �� I` _ f �'� ml m. m�� j I� — - �I'- �J--__ j EN _' ,
// � ..i , m z. m� / � �INO7E B '�� i'.N07E B � m m ` •� ,y��.
G . m �i �� /
`_s �� � i �I � � � � � � "� � � � * �'� '�'� * � v",�
� � � - � _ " �� - � i— �i // ii i� � / i� � ��� i
r � -� s , �r�- �
- N07E "C'", TYR EASi WWG REWFORCE E%IST RIDGE BOARD TYP.:
Y C��
N �y J SEE NOiE " " S-2 . MASONRY BEAMNUNDE�R�EXISi� RID,GE�BEAM. ~'.: I
I P'?Y1�� O ROOF FRAMING PLAN �
�/jz" = I'-0" EXT. WALL, FASiEN ENDS TO E%ISTING TIMBER
f EXISTING FRAMINC PWN SCHEUULE j• � T�"P. iRU55 WI7H SIMPSON HANGERS, iYP. w'.
� 1 NOTE "A": REWFORCE EX157. SKYLIGHT iRIMMER BEAMS, 7YP SISiER EA. SKYLIGHT 7RIMMER BEAM W/ (I)-1�/x11� LVL ON ��
RR-1 - IN�ICA7E5 I/�xl7le � �Z� O.C. RAFTERS ��V OUTSIDE�FREE FACE, FULL lENG7H, NO SPLICES y ,
RR-2 - INDICA7E5 P/qx11�/e � 72'� O.C. RAFTERS � 3
RR-3 - IN�ICA7E5 RECENTLY COMPLE7ED OORMER MFlLL R�ERS.\j� � NOTE "B": AT E%ISi TRU55 EN�S WHERE 7HERE ARE NO EXIS7INC META� WAII ANCHORS FASiENED TO THE SIOES OF THE �
� RR-4 - INDICA7E5 2�/x�B � Z�h�� �.C. RAFIERS � �' E%1571NG TFU55 60TlOM CHOROS FASiENINC THE 7RUSS i0 WALL, INSiALL NEW ilES PER 1/S-5. QNVES7IGATE ALL TRU55 ENDS, �
CJ-1 - INDICA7E5 UNKNOWN CLC J015T5 \ C/` REQ�D A7 5 LOC.). ("�"' INDICATES LOCA710N OF EXISTING 57RAP ➢E)
RB-1 - INOICA7E5 4x12 7RIMMER BEAM �.
RB-2 - M�ICAiES 4x71� RAFlER — � � �� i �. � �'_,
RB-3 - INDICA7E5 DOUBLE RARER �� )NOTE ,•�": A7 MAN. 48" O.C., WHERE THERE ARE NO EXISi1NC METAL WALL ANCHORS FASTENING ENOS OF RARERS 70 EXISL EX7 a �� �.�.
RB-4 - UNKNOWN (FIN. SIZE 9x12), VLF. `I�' O ��MASONRY WALLS, IN57ALL NEW ➢ES PER 2�5-5. (N07E THE SALEM CIiY BUILOINC DEPARTMENT HAS GNEN VERBAL PERMISSION ON �
RB-5 - 2�x7 RI�GE 60ARD "S g-p�-p012 70 DEFER UNTIL ROOMS ARE REMODELLED 70 AVOID REMOVING EXISTING FlNISHES.) e � �
BW-1 - INOICA7ES 6EARING WALL (3x3� WOOD S7U05 � 12" O.C.) r
�-.r��_
� -� - - 0�'_ AT EACH SKYLIGH7 TRIMMER BEAM INCREASE FASiENINC OF NEW LEOCER AT EACH NEARESi SUPPORTINC STUO/P057 p�'
°.� � ��� . , � � PER SKS-10-22-12-07. -'
o LET-IN NEW TRIMMER,&
u RE-CONNECT HEADERS W/ � -'�,
� S MP N F M HC;R:S TVP 4
ILOC. �
tructures North ����� J0e `�C� G�rq ' N�rw
CONSULTINGENGINEERS,ING SHEETNO. JKS_�D-/,�'��Z-b� OF /�
P.O. BO% 8560, SALEM, MA Ot9]t CALWlATEOBT OATE /u �L � -
PN� B]B . ]�5'.B81] FG% 9]8 . ]45.806] .
WWW . STPUCTUFES - NOXTM . COM � '
. bHECHE�BY OATE(� � � �Z �
. • SCALE ��� �• �\V' �/I Y� � I
I i
.. . _ . .�'. .. _. '� .. ..�. . ... n
, ' ���QVUF 7nlv�wtb�'L ,
; n
� �,,j�v� s�sr�r��),s� �� : ;
, ,
� �- - - - --- -:;—__ ,
� f `Gt�GCrL-l�l� ;
LS/l Gtll6tv� ���� �� �'c2EWS- � �
, : SpciLet,cc-�I �M�� l,tr/-u. °
� ; 1 . _ ����Grrr�-rermne-ns �
. � . _ r s. �:�y•,o,n .._ _•,
� . e - �... ,.
��.. ' ... . _ ._ , �: e'` _ �,:..— `'�.,_ _ �_ !1 -�45Et�/1E�E � ��
�° � "� ���%N�cE P��t+z "
� � �, � � G✓rti�C 71�/' �
� �
� +� . °
� ._ . . �� .
, . �
�- . � � �E�C2�-`�� :
� . �PL�T� _
j � , /J�M��.. ;.
� " ` e
; , � . �
j ' COMin�oau'S ` _ � !E7 �AS� . �
�� �3�y k 5��L V l�L, . Y"`//�j�...
� �(;eY�C��l2 .Ti(�n'� TCA:S�D� �FS'kYUGHT�mmt�. �
i ' '1� Ur�VJl;vCS iQ(s' B� _ r'� '/h/N� (0 ` ' 0 ;
� ,2uur ge�s � _ s���s pr�. Ex, �7, ��,
� intr�. F32G t,✓qu _ ✓+� ��, �2) S�v o 5
i ' rl v;S c,���S ru rn>• TUT`t�� . : °
/-E'f NDn!-SxYll(�H"RZ�n+rtiE2' LU '�
� . . . (a) rn�r�- `3�-!Gc/ nrni�s � ;
, ` , C2)-CG'DGe�2tUk SG✓Lel:�s ('��'L ;
� 2x ��tr C(.�`a'� e FX�S-(.' STVI� � o
� . ; �T �✓L (,ebG��SF��c� : !. �
; �TS�-}c� 1�" Ex6i Syvo
; , _. _ .
� � _ . , , . ,
:. _,. _ , ,_ ; ....
� r � : � _ ., . . . , : ' . � . . .. ' � . . ; . . � . .: . .: ' . : . . : - � . , , , _ a . � ':
I - o Pnooumzo�
�
Y ..
cut line for new LVL trimmer
sisters (exist 4x12 to remain I
uncut)
EXIS7. SILL
BEAM, V.I.F. �
��. �.-_�� __�-,_., _,__,
i (N) 4x4 W/ (3�/e„ "
EXIST. RAFTER , x8" LAG COUNTERSUNK �
TRIMMER BEAM p SCREWS INTO RAFTER �
�—_ -- �
NEW SIMPSON
°LTT131„
6"'
MIN.
5/e"0 x10" S7AINLESS STEEL ANCH. BOLTS
DRILLED & SET W EXIS7. MASONRY W/
HILTI HY20 ADHESIVE W/ SCREEN TUBES—
NOTE: BORIC ACID TREAT RAFfER ENDS
WHERE RAFTER ENDS AT THE 40 MOST �
STAINED LOC'NS
,� Salem City Hall �
1Es 1/28/2013
nWALL TIE DETAIL
S-5 N.T.S.
Z:\CADD\Projects\2012\12045 Salem City Hall RooflStruct\S-2,3,4,5 TYP BEAM BEAf
PITMAN &
WARDLEY
ARCHITECTS LLc
Febmary 7,2013
Mr. Michael Lutrrykowski
Assistant Building Inspector
CiTy of Salem
Salem City Hall
93 Washington Street
Salem,MA 01970
Re: Mattera's Bar and Cafe
72 Wharf Street
Salem,MA 01970
Deaz Mr.Lutrzykowski,
I am submitting ihis letter in response to your wncems regaiding the STC Rating requirement and the kitchen
venting requi�+ements in regards to the renovalion projec[at 72 Wliarf Street(Mattera's Baz and CafB).
The minimum STC Rating required by the Massachusetts Staie Building Code sec[ions 120'7.2 and 120Z3 is 50
STC(45 if tes[ed). On page A-2 we have provided the contrac[or with an assembly that will meet this requirement.
FuRhermore,the pmject owners have engaged an acoustical engineer to help mitigate this issue. The engineer ttas
performed sound testing in the field,and his report of existing conditions can be found attached to lltis letter. The
eacis[ing condiUon is compliant and we will work hard to maintain or exceed that existing rnGng.
In regards to the ldtchen venting requirement,based upon NFPA 96 4.1.I.1 "cooking equipment that has been listed
in accordance with ANSUUL 197 or an eqtivalent standazd for reduced emissions shall not be required to be
provided with an exhaust system." The owners have submitted a list of equipment tttat they will be using and we
have verified that[hese items comply with iJL/197. It is our detennination that the idtchen will not be required to be
mechanically vented.
Please do not hesitate to be in[ouch with Uris office should you have any fur[her queslions or concerns.
Re tfiillY�
�
yan McShera, Associate
32 CHURCH ST
S A L E M
MASSACHUSETTS
0 1 9 7 0
978-744-8982
� FAX 978-744-0400
. ,
J. & A. Enterprises, It1C. 16 Broadway
Noise and Vibration Engineering Sa1em, nnA 01970
Phone(978)741-1551
Fax (978)741-4447
Noise Survey in the First and Second Floors of 72 Wharf St. in Salem, MA
January 29,2013
On January 28, 2013 Aaron Korby of J&A Enterprises conducted the survey and noise
transmission measurements at?2 Wharf St. in Salem,MA. The survey was done in order to
evaluate the existing sound transmission from the first floor ofthe building(where a restaurant is to
be open)to the apartment#70A on the second floor of the building,directly above the restaurant
The purpose of the measurements is to determine airbome sound trartsmission through the
floor/ceiling system of the apartments of the second floor, and the restaurant.
This was done in order to quantify the sound insulation properties of the existing floor/ceiling
system and enable the comparison of the exis[ing sound transmission to the requuements of the
Massachusetts State Building Code.
Airborne Noise Transmission throug6 the FloodCeiling Assembly
tn order to establish compliance with the State Board of Building Regulations and Standards,
the Massachusetts State Building Code 788 CRM 1207,evaluarion of Sound Transmission through
the floor/ceiling assembly of the building was done according to AST'M E 336-OS "Standazd Test
Method for Measurement of Airbome Sound Attenuation between Rooms in Buildings". For
evaluating noise reduction currently provided by the floor/ceiling system beriveen the first and the
second floors,a source of noise was placed in the restawant on the first floor;and noise spectra were
measured at the source,and in the receiving space. The receiving space was selected to be
apartment#70A of the second floor direcUy above the space with the noise source. Calculated
difference represents noise reduction provided by the existing floor/ceiling system(the ambient
noise was much lower than the intruding source noise,and did not affect the calculations). Similaz
measurements were done for two more positions of the noise source in the kitchen of the restaurant;
and the receiving space directly above on sewnd floor.
The single digit measure of sound transmission through a floor/ceiling assembly is the so-
called Apparent Sound Transmission Class—ASTC rating. Compliance with the bcal Building
Code'780 CMIt 1207.0 requires an ASTC rating ofthe floor/ceiling assembly to be STC 45 or
greater:
<.
Walls,partitions and floor/ceiling assemblies separating dwelling units from each other,or
from public or service areas shall have a Sound Transmission Class(STC)of not less than 50(45 if
field tested)for airborne noise..."
�i_�Gv
�yC_./
, ,
J. 8 A. Enterprises, Inc.
Noise and Vibration Engineering
Floor/Ceiling Coostruction and Measurement Results
J&A was presented with no building plans for the floor/ceiling assembly.Our observations
suggest that the assembly may consist of the following:
• Hardwood floor;
• subfloor;
• 3 1/2"Rouul AFB in 12"cavity;
• '/e"stripPing;
• '/<"Homosote Sound Board(or similar);
• Additional cavity of I.Sft for the ventilaYion ductwork (at some areas, but not
everywhere);
• 5/8"F'vecode Blue Boazd
Airbome noise reduction ttuough the described floor/ceiling assembly was measured at two
sound source,and three receiver locations(as described earlier). For the sound source iwo sets of
Roland Speaker/Amplifier were used,operating in a sound sweep mode(moving from 50 Hz tone
to 5000 Hz tone).
Per AST'M E336-OS item 12.2,the levels of apparent transmission loss were adjusted for the
sound absorption in the receiving rooms. To determine the values of sound absorption,
reverberation time was measured in the receiving rooms ofthe aparhnent on the second floor in
accordance with the Test Method E2235.
Airbome apparent STC(ASTC)rafing ofthe assembly is in the range of49 to 52(see Fig.l,
and 2).
T'he measurements demonstrate that the requirements of the Massachusetts State Building
Code 788 CRM 1207 are satisfied.
One should keep in mind that the requirements of the Building Code are the absolute
minimum values for the acoustic separation between the occupied spaces in a residential building.
Practice has shown that at these levels of ASTC rating people sometimes still feel that their living
space is intruded acousdcally. Fortunately,the apartments above the restaurant aze two level
apartments with the bedrooms located on the third floor. Such a layout provides additional
protection of the tenants from the noise intruding from the restaurant. However,a good practice is to
pmvide an ASTC rating of 60 or higher. If this value of ASTC is a goodwill goal,then the e�sring
ASTC falls short ofthis goal(currently measured ASTC is 49 to 52).
In order to achieve a better level of ASTC the new ceiling(which will be all brought down to
the lowest level of the existing ceiling,with the overall cavity above the ceiling to the underside of
the floor of approx.2 %s')should be made of two layers of sheetrock with a layer of 2 lb/ft sound
barrier material(TufIMass,or similaz)sandwiched between them. Best if the new ceiling is
2
��'���/ '�
J. 8� A. Enterprises, Inc.
Noise and�bration Engineering
elasticaliy mounted using Mason Industries ceiling hangers(or similar elastic hangers),or resilient
RC-1 cliannels. The lower cavity,below the joists, should have a layer of sound absorprive material,
6"or more thick.Such composiNon of the ceiling is expected to increase the STC rating to approx.
60-63. Omitting the second layer of sheehnck will result in STC reduction to approx. 58-60 STC.
Omitting the resilient suspension of the ceiling may decrease the ASTC by 3-5 points.
It is the responsibiliry of the owner/builder to check if all the materials used in the
floodceiling assembly satisfy the requirements of the fire regulations.
To reduce the possibility of considerable stnxctureborne noise(which will effectiveiy reduce
, the ASTC rating of the floor ceiling assembly)it is important that the speakers aze either installed on
the floor(preferred),or mounted resiliently on the walls(if floor installation is impossible).
Iastrumentation
Noise measwements were done with Larson Davis sound level meter mode1812 (serial#0213);
The instrument has current calibration (calibration date May-2011);
FFT Analyzer Panasonic CF-19 Soundbook serial #06330;
Roland Speaker/Amplifier model Mobile Cube ZX04922.
Attachments
1. Airborne Noise Reduction through Floor/Ceiling Assembly from the restaurant to the
Living Room center, Fig.l
2. Airbome Noise Reduction through Floor/Ceiling Assembly from the restaurant to the
Living Room at the windows,Fig.2
3. Airbome Noise Reducdon through Floor/Ceiling Assembly from the restaurant to the
apartment above near the entrance door, Fig3
3
.%'�i�_/_�"
C��
� r �-�-ypT-r---r--;-r-p ,�m --?--,-�-r-ry 1--- Z �
tQ ;� .O �N !O �O IO N{� 'O �O �4wi �',O S � 'N G 'O� y _ _ �
� �O IO O O O IO 'q O O �O N N �
� .}�-,1�.Y..4.=.1�i. _, ..t T , . -r---�--i -+ - � -i-- - m
N f N j N N N I N I ` '� � i � j �
�_,�.�.���i�'������"4���+�_��{.N�N'!(D,�01'i41 O a
I ; ' , I _ _ , ._t� � Z�D�� � m
�7 � aa ,p��
� ' � ItD C ID N W � �'
�N �N �N IN �N Ifn (T�N IN �A A A 'A W ItJ fJ n f0 C 0' 1
� N 10 .t0 W �V �f0 {D W N tJ� Ol A O b (V N 1 � d
�A_tAio�o �o� �-m m�m+o o m �ohao�o wt... � . ._ � � �C
+ � �i �i � � �� � . � c � m ��A I'ft �.
� -Y_.L"_ N � � � N � � (IJ
� � i
�' ��'i m �`�i rn � I �N� �W�-�+-+N �IJ I<°. °' I � � . �- - m N
��� i .i � � '�"� �w-.`g.-_.—..._. � ..
� � i � a
I> -+ .W �W N i i �W � W �-� ��V 'N A �'V� N �N A : � Ip '7
t.yrwi. t .t _�. }.'—} .--.t _}.. {.---��i � � __i _1..- ._� . .' . �
NiN I �
O -.
��N i � ' � . � � � . � 1 1 ( i
�a'd � ASTC rating,d8
x � �
'��d � o 0 0 o S o � 0 1
5.,— �
•��o �zs
c
�i , I
�Da I
�; a , �so �
�,,�i. � `c'
.n'n� �� 'D � i
!m�� � 200 NO.
�:
d� aZ �
�i 250 O N,
�Wi � �
'o '� 315 A � ,'O
I�i � y D N �
a '
� ..1 400 C d n �;
� m � � '
� T soo '.�� A � i
. � m a » �, ;� � d rn
0
,.... - �� c s3o � � � '� m 3 0
� � (D n � C �„' fD � 5
� i �� � 800 �� � '�� l
' r"� � 2 W p ID j� � in �
--1 N i000 3 � ;� � o
! { � �
j
� �zso � �D �
� N
� -} M
, � I 1600 � 3 �
� d Q I
� I � 2000 +II p�� !
h -�—�' o I p�3 �
, i 2500 c� $.�c II
' � '� 3150 m � z�' �
,�� c�i `Z W j
� � � 4000 �
, �L_L__�__ __�,z. .__.�._-- — r
J. & A. Enterprises, Inc. . '
Noise and Vibration Engineering
� � ` T_ ' I Ad usted Noise Reduction of FloorlCeilin Assemb �
I �Measured Refeie 1 9 �Y
adjusted nce � between 2nd floor Apartrnent near Windows and
;Noise sTC , Restaurant ASTC50.3
�Reduction'conto Defici j �a
'Cune �ur �ts
-;--r —
, . ��s�� 0 42.8'� 34; -8 sa
1'--t------ -+---
-1--—_._. _
I 160 3� 32.8 37L 5�
-t- -- - so
C -fi � ' '
200 6 36.3 40� -4
�_ _. i- - . _� _ _..__ _ f�
_ r - - fi' - v
. ' 25a 9, 35.3, 43� 8i
_t_..�._._..—.---f-- +�._. .. �
, � at5'.��. 12� 48.3`r 46�� -2., � ao
' ��40a�� 1� 46.2 49 3' �
4-. y . _+._--.__ +__"y.._.-_.�_.- V
� 500� 16� 52.51 50.3 I -2'STC 30
-F —a- -----f----t' --'- -- ~ �
' �I630� 17� 56.9! 51= �I � '
�`-"1- � -+' a 20 �Measuretl ��
� BOOi 18I 56.8 52i -5�
_.,T,-_�.__ t_�.,_ AdjustetlNoise �
. 1000, 19 57.1 53' -0' ReductionCury �
!� � �ReferenceSTC
_.r..__�._. . 10
. 1250 20 60.7 54' �6..
� -+---- - --F- -- contour I
� 1600` 20- 60.1 54' -6 `
- �-��- +'--- --__.t..._�.-. 0 t
2000' 2�_0*_ 61.7' S4 -7� ! � N N � � N � � o $ o $ o v�i o
. 2500�. 20 63.�--9 � o N m N N � � �
',— ' --�-� -t - *� � Frequenc Hz
a�w zo sa.s' 5a -io: y� �I
-- -+-- - — �-
a000t 2o ss a� 54� 5� ',
. _--r ,-r--_- -f'. _ «�._. ._..- - � � ----�i �- � --- ... _ .. . . . .,._ __, . . . __,_ �
� 20 32 is mau allowed deficd _ �, �
_�� � second restnction is 8 d6 in any 1!3 octa� J' `� _~�� �- , t � � -�
� . - - — _ . _ _ -- -
Fig. 2
I z
, J. 8� A. Enterprises, Inc.
Noise and Vibration Engineering
T- r _ ._" '�.'_ '._�_"'�..�. .'" "�'_ . "_.�_ _'___.' _'_' ._ T_ __'_' . r._'_'. i _' "'_.__�. __, . ... �
r 1 �Measured Refe2� ' Adjusted Nolse Reduction of FboHCeiling Assembiy '
� � f ;Adjusted �nce � ' between 2nd floor Apartrnent near Entrance door and �
I � �Noise ;sTC � Restaurant ASTC49.2 '
� ;Reduction conto Deficii �0 I
�Cune lur ts I
�-�- �-- -�---+----�- .�
+u: 0 39.0 33, -6. ao
—+�- - ---� ---rt----+---� ---+
; teo 3t 30.5 36, 6
--{--�-----t---r- - �+
' zoo 6' 35.0. 39 4� so
' +-,-----+-- - +— m - a
z5o 9 34.2 42 8' 'a
' �_{—"'Y'__'_'_--.".'" '_y..__" __ 1
; 3ts�12i 47•2� 45 -2; °��
c
�— --�-----�— -{---T` _ � —,
aoo 15� 44.9 48� 3.
� i—,� --—�---;--.--r— --,
' Soo'.. 16. 50.7' 49.2 -2 STC U 3a !
� F—�t---�------�--- � - �
� Bso� 17�Y_ 55.31 50� -5�4- . _..1
� �----i�-- . '- *--- Q 20 —�—Measuretl -i
� �-800�� 18'. 55.2 Slr -4. _i
t--� Adjusted No'se
"�.—.1._ .�
, j �000. 19 55.5 52, -3� Reauctioncury �
' r.__ ..r_.+_._._.__ .+..__.t _, �� -�_1
i ` 7250� 20 58.9� 53; -6��� �ReterenceSTC
_..�..._ �------� ---7--- conrour — 1
, teoo 20, SS.r 53 Sri _ �
- ��—t--�----��?-- - +-- — p
', z000 2D 59.7' S3 -�7!_ _. . � S o � � S o � S S � S o 8 � o
,, � "�I. .y_ . . _.�... N N l7 V b f0 !O O N (O N N b! O
zsoo� 20� 61.5 53' -8�
Fre uenc " '
-atwt 20� sz.z 53 9t q Y,Hz _ ;
- t t---- �r-- - -
a000 20} ss.s 53 3� __ �J
, -
� _ __
� 21 32 is max allowed deficit _� � ! �.
.,� �� �� _ _ �__ __
-1--- -t---
�_ _l �_�. T�second restriction is 8 dB in any 1/3 octave . � �
- - - - -— _ _ __— ,� _�._ - ---;- - _ _ _ � . ._
Fig. 3
3
�
. ,, . ,.
2/13/2013
Longboards Caf�& Bar
72 WharfStreet
Salem, MA 01970
By signing below, I confirm that I wrote the six page report and performed the tests that were taken at
72 Wharf Street on January 28, 2013.
�f-_`�--s�
2/13/2013
Aaron Korby
J&A Enterprises
16 Broadway
Salem, MA
978-741-4447
� 1
Longboards Cafe& Bar
72 Wharf Street
Salem, MA
List Of Equipment To Be Used
- Waring panini press. Model #WPG150
- Avantco countertop griddle. Model#EG16
- Lincoln electric conveyor oven. Model #1132-000-U
- Nemco countertop food warmer. Model #6055A
- Hamilton Beach crock pot. Model #33461
- Hobart slicer
- Microwave
- Various refrigeration and freezers
Matthew Mattera - Owner
„}
. , /7..
v �C��
To VJhom It May Concern: April, 9, 2008
The requirement for fire-extinguisiring equipment in operations where hazardous canditions e7cist is
unquestionable. The NFPA 96 Standaxd for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial
Coo ” Operations. Section 7.1.2 identifies cooking equipment such es broilers,daep fat fryers,ranges,
griddles, etc that produce grease laden vapors sre required to have this fire-extinguishing equipment
installed. The standard also indicates that the equipment identified in that paragraph is not an exclusive
list. The standard permits the local suthority to exercise judgment on each individual piece of
eqvipment as to whether the cooking equipment being installed produces grease-laden vapors.
The Lincoln Impinger�ovens are designed and tested to the ANSWL 197 standard or the ANSI Z83
standard for commercial baking and roasting ovens. The design and application of this commerciai
equipment is in baking and fuushing of many different products including pizza. Neither the design.nor
test conditions that tlus oven is required to meet, by these regulatory bodies,has ever included abnormal
or nomial operating conditions&om the effects of grease or grease laden vapors. The normal
recommended cleaning operations of the ovens zemove primarily the crumbs and debris from the baking
processes. There are no specific required cleaning steps for gtease removal.
The Lincoln conveyor ovens are designed in such a manner that the effluent emitting from the conveyor
openings do contain very small amounts of grease-laden vapors from the processing tl�at occurs from the
cooking of products containing different forms of fat such as meats and cheeses used on pizza.
However,untike the broilers where the products are exposed to the}ugh temperature direct tlame or
infrared heaters,the Lincoln Impinger�ovens operate below 600°F in the cooking chamber heated by
forced air. The products processed through the conveyor ovens are never exposed W texnperatures that
will reach the flash point of grease. Lincoln does not recommend or support the modification of the
ovens to operate in a manner that would replicate the operation of a broiler. The oven construction has
never been required in the last 20 years of manufacturing to accommodate excess run-off of grease from
any of its pizza customers. The basic operation of the ovens in a pizza environment consists of baking
the crust and heating the toppings to a temperature of 200°F or less in less than 10 minutes in the baking
chamber. This type of operation has beea used extensively in the pizza industry with other conveyor
oven manufacturers including Lincoln Impinger�ovens without the fire-extinguishing equipment.
The local authority having jurisdiction has the ultimate authority in maldng the decisioa of the
requirement for the use of the fire-extinguishing equipment. The NFPA 96 standard is used in many
locations,however, some localities have adopted their own requirements and the specifics of each one
would need to be evaluated se�arately. Faced with the understanding that the conditions of operation
are significantly different between the conveyor broilers and conveyor ovens, Section 7.1.2 of the NFPA
96 standazd applies to the conveyor broilers and not to conveyor ovens.
,���i'f/ %
Derek Walz
Director of Engineering
7111 North Hadley Road•Fort Weyne,Intllena 48804•(280)459-8200•FAX:(280)438-0735 •www.lfncoinfp.com
♦
,. '
i''7.
v I.�1C0�1
Apri19,2008
To Whom It May Concern:
The Lincoln 2' 1130 Series Electric Impinger�is an electric appliance and Lincoln does
not requixe that it be located under a ventila6on hood. This unit is also listed with
Underwriter Laboratory and was tested by them to the ANSI/UL 197 standard without
, the use of a venUladon hood. Their listing dces not require the use of a ventilation hood.
The UL Listing Number is File E27122 Volume 5 Sections 31 &37.
Our customers have located these ovens in areas at an aznbient temperature of 95°F or
less,without the use of a ventilation hood,with no adverse effect. The local suthority
having jurisdiction has the ulrimate authority in making the decision of the requirement
, for the use of a ventilation system. If your local code requires a ventilation system, they
will state what type of hood should be installed above the unit.
' Please call if there are any questions or if further explanation is needed.
Very truly yours,
�� v`
Derek Walz
�
Director of Engineering
1�11 North Hadloy Road•Fort Weyne,Indfena 48804•(260)459-8200•FAX:(260)438-0735 �w�vw.lincolntp.com
- - � - � - - .. . -- - - - - - -- - J
t
, J. 8� A. Enterprises, Inc. 16 Broadway
Noise and Vibration Engineering salem, MA 01970
Phone (978)741-1551
Fax (978)741-4447
Noise Survey in the First and Second Floors of 72 Wharf St. in Salem, MA
January 29, 2013
On January 28, 2013 Aaron Korby of J&A Enteiprises conducted the survey and noise
transmission measwements at 72 Wharf St. in Sa1em,MA. The survey was done in order to
evaluate the earisting sound transmission from the first floor of the building(where a restaurant is to
be open)to the apartment#70A on the second floor of the building, direcUy above the restaurant.
The purpose ofthe measurements is to determine airbome sound transmission through the
floor/ceiling system of the apartments of the second floor, and the restaurant.
This was done in order to quantify the sound insulation properhies of the existing floor/ceiling
system and enable the comparison of the existing sound transmission to the requirements of the
Massachusetts State Building Code.
Airborne Noise Transmission through the Floor/Ceiling Assembly
In order to establish compliance with the State Board of Building Regulations and Standazds,
the Massachusetts State Building Code 788 CRM 1207, evaluation of Sound Transmission through
the floor/ceiling assembly of the building was done according to ASTM E 336-OS "Standard Test
Method for Measurement of Airborne Sound Attenuation between Rooms in Buildings". For
evaluating noise reduction cuirently provided by the floor/ceiling system between the first and the
second floors, a source of noise was placed in the restaurant on the first floor; and noise spectra were
measured at the source, and in the receiving space. The receiving space was selected to be
apartrnent#70A of the sewnd floor direcfly above the space with the noise source. Calculated
difference represents noise reduction provided by the existing floor/ceiling system(the ambient
noise was much lower than the intruding source noise, and did not si£ect the calculations). Similar
measurements were done for two more positions of the noise source in the kitchen of the restaurant;
and the receiving space directly above on second floor.
The single digit measure of sound transmission through a floor/ceiling assembly is the so-
called Apparent Sound Transmission Class—ASTC rating. Compliance with the local Building
Code 780 CMR 1207.0 requires an ASTC rating of the floor/ceiling assembly to be STC 45 or
greater:
"Wa11s, partitions and floor/ceiling assemblies separating dwelling units from each other, or
from public or service areas shall have a Sound Transmission Class(STC)of not less than 50(45 if
field tested)for sirbome noise..."
; J. 8� A. Enterprises, Inc.
Noise and Vibration Engineering
Floor/Ceiling Construction and Measurement Results
7&A was presented with no building plans for the floor/ceiling assembly. Our observations
suggest that the assembly may consist of the following:
• Hardwood floor,
• subfloor;
• 3 1/2"Roxul AFB in 12" cavity;
• 3�4�� s�PP�n6;
� 3�4��Homosote Sound Boazd(or similar);
• Additional cavity of 1.Sft for the ventilation ductwork (at some areas, but not
everywhere);
• 5/8"Firecode Blue Board
Airbome noise reduction through the described floor/ceiling assembly was measured at two
sound source, and three receiver locations(as described earlier). For the sound sowce two sets of
Roland Speaker/Amplifier were used, operating in a sound sweep mode(moving from 50 Hz tone
to 5000 Hz tone).
Per ASTM E336-OS item 12.2,the levels of apparent ffansmission loss were adjusted for the
sound absorption in the receiving rooms. To determine the values of sound absorption,
reverberation time was measured in the receiving rooms of the apartrnent on the second floor in
accordance with the Test Method E2235.
Ai�ome apparent STC (ASTC)rating of the assembly is in the range of 49 to 52 (see Fig.l,
and 2).
The measurements demonstrate that the requirements of the Massachusetts State Building
Code 788 CRM 1207 are satisfied.
One should keep in mind that the requirements of the Building Code are the absolute
minimum values for the acoustic separation between the occupied spaces in a residential building.
Practice has shown that at these levels of ASTC rating people sometimes still feel that their living
space is intruded acoustically. Fortunately, the apardnents above the restsurant are two level
apaztments with the bedrooms located on the third floor. Such a layout provides additional
protection of the tenants from the noise intruding from the restaurant. However, a good practice is to
provide an ASTC rafing of 60 or higher. If this value of ASTC is a goodwill goal,then the e�cisting
ASTC falls short of this goal (currently measwed ASTC is 49 to 52).
In order to achieve a better level of ASTC the new ceiling(which will be all brought down to
the lowest level of the�isting ceiling,with the overall cavity above the ceiling to the underside of
the floor of approx. 2 '/z') should be made of two layers of sheetrock with a layer of 2 Ib/ftZ sound
barrier material (TutIlVlass, or similar) sandwiched between them. Best if the new ceiling is
2
, J. & A. Enterprises, Inc.
Noise and Vibration Engineering
elastically mounted using Mason�ndustries ceiling hangers(or similaz elastic hangers), or resilient
RGl channels. The lower cavity, below the joists, should have a layer of sound absorptive material,
6" or more thick. Such composition of the ceiling is expected to increase the STC rating to appmx.
60-63. Omitting the second layer of sheetrock will result in STC reduction to approx. 58-60 STC.
Omitting the resilient suspension of the ceiling may decrease the ASTC by 3-5 points.
It is the responsibility of the owner/builder to check if all the materials used in the
floor/ceiling assembly satisfy the requirements of the fire regulations.
To reduce the possibility of considerable stcuctureborne noise(which will effectively reduce
the ASTC ra6ng of the floor ceiling assembly)it is important that the speakers are either installed on
the floor(prefeired), or mounted resiliently on the walls(if floor installation is impossible).
Instrumentation
Noise measurements were done with Larson Davis sound level meter model 812 (serial #0213);
The instrument has current calibration (calibration date May-2011);
FFT Analyzer Panasonic CF-19 Soundbook serial #06330;
, Roland Speaker/Amplifier model Mobile Cube ZX04922.
Attachments
1. Airborne Noise Reduction through Floor/Ceiling Assembly from the restaurant to the
Living Room center, Fig.l
2. Airborne Noise Reduction through Floor/Ceiling Assembly from the restaurant to the
Living Room at the windows, Fig.2
3. Airborne Noise Reduction through Floor/Ceiling Assembly from the restaurant to the
apartment above near the entrance door, Fig.3
3
J. 8 A. Enterprises, Inc. ,s e�oaa�y . I
, Noise and Vibration Engineering Salem,MA o1s7o
' Phone(978)741-1551
Fax (978)741�I447
nneasured Refere Adjusted Noise Reduction of FloodCeiling Assembly �
Adjusted nce between 2nd floor Apartrnent Living Room Cer�ter; and �
Noise sTc Restaurant. ASTC 52.3 �
Reduction coMo Defici � (
Curve ur ts i
' 125i 0 32.3 36: 4., �
i
, 180i 3; 37.0 39! 2 i
200, 6' 39.8 42' 2' m �
' 250; 9 40.4 45 5 �
', 975f 12 44.8 48 4 c�
q00. 15 46.0 51 5' � '
5ao 16, 45.0' S2.3 7 STC F �
� Bso 17� —�—�� — � -- � '�
eo0 18 56.9! 54: _3' a zo —r rdeas�uea
� Mjusted No'se i
ReduetionGw
loo0 19' S9.6 55 � �
. --�'�— - --- -�'�'—'t'---- W �ReferenceSTC �
7250 20 59.1 56� 3 conmiv i
� 7w0' 20', 57.0. 56 -1 i
� 200� 20' 58.0� 56� -2' �ry g � � � � � � � � � � � � �, � '
—r—
2wo. 20 59.0 56' 3 � " '
s�so� 2o ss.s' ss� � Frequency, Hz !
a000 2o ss.a; ss! r
31'32 is mau allowed deficit ^�-�--_-�--�-_- I
second restriction is 8 dB in any 1!3 octaw ��
� Fig. l
J. 8� A. Enterprises, Inc.
Noise and Vibration Engineering
Measured Refere. Adjusted Noise Reduction of FIooNCeiling Assembty �
adjusted nce between 2nd floor Apartment near Windows and �
Noise src Restaurant. ASTC 50.3 �
Reduction coMo Defici � �
Curve ur ts �
125; 0 42.8 34� � �
160' 3' �32�.8, 3�7 � 5 �
200 fi 36.3� 40� 4� � �
m j
250 9 35.3.' 43! 81 �
378' 12 48.3, 46; -2'� c�'w
a
400 15 46.2� qg; 3 �°
� ---t-- V 9p .
500; 16 52.5, 50.3 -2 STC �
eso� 17 56.9 51 �Y_ �
Bpp 18' S6.9 52� S' a 20 �Measiaed j
Adjusted Noise I .
1000 19' 57.1' S3� 11 ReductionGm �
1250' 20 60.7 54: �; �� �ReterenceSTC
conMia
7600 20 60.1 �' �
2000 20 61.7 54? -7*— �'R' g � � � $ � � a6 if � 9S � � � � '
2soo 20' 63.6 54 -9
�-� - � - �-- Fre uen Hz '
s��oi zo sa s - -5a, -to 9 ��
a000 zo s.a�—�-- 5 !
20 32 is max allowed deficit �— ���y�— I
second restriction is 8 dB in any 1/3 octave -�---r
Fig.2 T
2
J. 8 A. Enterprises, lnc.
Noise and�bration Engineering
�
MeaS�red Ret�re. Adjusted Noise Reduction of Floor/Ceiling Assembly
' Adiusted nce belween 2nd floor Apartrnent near Entrance door and
Noise STC Resteur~dnt ASTC 49.2
Reduction:conto Dafici 7o I
Curve ur ts '
�2e; 0 38.0 33 -6 eo
teo 3' 30.5 36 6'
200 6 35.0 39 4 _ m so
250� 9�34.2, 42� 8 '�
376' 12, 47.Y: 45 -2' °�°�
-r- 1-----� ---+--r— :�
400� 15� 44.+ 48: 3,r_ � _
soo 1fi 50.7 49.2 -Z STC U �
---r-� -+- — -r--- � -
e3o 17 55.� 50 -5
800 18 55.2I 51 -4 a Zo -a-Measured
Adjusted No'se
�ooai 19 55.5 52� -3 rteaucuoncury
1260� 20 5 9 53 -�— �� �ReferenceSTC
conrour
t600� 20 58.2 53' -5"
2000 20�-59.T 53 7� �� � 8 � � � � � � � � � �
2soo, 20 6.5' S3 8 � � "' � � � ^ �
-�- "�--- � Y- -- Fre uen Hz
atso 20 62.2, 53I -9 9 ��
---i- -t---- - - �---t---
4000i 2p 56.6 53 -3.
- - - - - _. . . _ .___ - . . _ _ _ - - _. __ _ .
-- -__.__ _
21 32 is max allowed deficit
� second restriction is 8 dB in any 1/3 octave
Fig. 3
3
� Ilti �
. . . . . . .. . . . :� �..� � . . . . � .
INSTALL ALL FINISH�S AND MATEi?IALS t0 MANUFAGTUIRERS SPECIPIGATIONS
KfTCNEN �QUfi�ll"'iENT i�I�C�4ANfG,4L NOTES
N07E:
GARPE7 INSTALL TO MANUFAGTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS TO ENSUI2� ALL EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION TO MEET BUILDINCs INDUSTRl' CONTRACTOR SFIALL PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALEp ENCsINEERED
CARPET PAD
S7C 5(I�+, PI20VIDE TESTINCs AS REQUIRED STANDARD. COORDINATE NEW SYSTEMS WITH EXISTINCs TO SUPPLY SNOP DR4WINC�S FIRE SUPRESSION SY57EM '
A GOMPLEt� CODE CONFORMINCs TURN KEY 5Y5TEM. CCOORDINAtE
3/4" TdCs PLYUJOOD SUBFLOOR BETIUEEN OUI�lER d CONTR4GTOR) A DESIGNBUILD HVAC SYSTEM SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND
� INSTALLED BY 7NE CsENERAL CONTRQCtOR
j'
EXIS71NCs JOIST ' - NOTE: PLUM�INC� �IXTIdR�S DRAVIINGS AND SPEGIPIGATIONS FOR DESICsNBUILD SYSTEMS SHALL
" " �° ' " 3 I/2" LAYER OF SOUND INSULATION t _ TNIS ASSEMBLY IS FOR PRICINCz PURPOS�S AND THE BE su�MI7TEp To ARGHITECt FOR APPRovAL PRIOR To
GONTRAGTOR SNALL VERIPY ALL EXISTINCz DETAILS ANCJ A DE51GN/BUILD PLUMB�NCs SYSTEM 5HALL BE SUPLLIED AND� CON57�,IGTION.
� I/2" RC i METAL� RESILIENT CHANNEL GOORDINATE WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS INSTALLED SY THE GENPRAL CONTR4GTOR
Cll LATER OF U/Z" FIRE RATHD CzTP � ENERfsY AUDIT OF SYSTEM AND DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE �
�� DRAWINCsS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PESICsN%BUfLD SYSTEMS SHALL SIJPPLIED AND COORDINATED BY TH� CsENER4L GONTR4GTOR
�y� � • BE SUBMITTED POR APPROVAL PRIOR t0 CONStRUGTION. /� t r, �
`-^^� PLUMBING GONtR4G70R TO INSPEC7 AND i2EPLACE EXISTINGi � I�� S�t�� I Y I V� I �S n � �
` CxREASE TRAF AS NEGESSARY. COORDINATE f2EQUIREMENTS WITH / �
CSTG RATINCs CJF l4) PROPER A.H.J. REYIEW ALL LIFE SAFETY AND ALARM REGtUIREMEN7S U11TH LOCAL �
FIRE DEPARTMENT. �
*� GONT(2AG70R TO INSPEGT ALL EXISTING FR4MING GONFORMANGE � � /r
�B� � NR RATED T�N,�NT ��OOR S�PA}�,QT IO�y � � TO REG2UIRED FIRE R4tED STANDARDS. ADD PIRE BLOCKIHG AS �l
A'Z SGAL�: NOt to SCAL� i Hec�ssaRY I � � �
,.,' V J
.. � �
� �
� , --- i � �
. �
� ; ` PROYIDE TANKLESiS EL£GTRIG NOT � ' PROVIDE TANKLESS �L�CTRIG I�OT WATER , �
; WATER NEATER BY� SUBMITTAL. O I-IEATER BY SUBMI7tAL. COORDINATE HOT � � J
NOTE: �G2U�PMgNT PRIORr 7 OORpER NCs 2�5 NEA7ER�aPRIOR TO ORDERINCz lUA ER , Q
PROYIpE MINIMUM I HR FIRE WATER NEATER � �
/ �
R4TINCa FOi2 ALL TENANT ' , , g_3 I
DEMISINCs WALLS AND ' � ' � � p % AH 1�IF �
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. STORAC-�E R4GK5 BY OUINER -: �� �� ,
� j
; , _- C� N
; . , ` , � _ - _ � I�_
, , �
INPILL DOOR FINISI-IES ON THIS p - ; , / • � �,
SIDE TO BE INSTALLED AS j , �
PER LANDLORDS APPROYAL: � STEPDOWN � � � � � MEN��RO�M��-- � � � �
PROVIDE I HR 7ENANT � � �
� '----'
SEPERATION AS REQUIRED il� � ` � - � , 2�4 r �� O �l � 202 ,_ _, � •
/ \ in � .� � � .
MECN ' 1"JEN'S Rb> M �,�` � ��' � _ ��,� � ����„�,; � ❑
��s � �� � ` `� o � �
, , , ;
� o o � 2m8 � � / .�' � 2�3 / � n
� B��R £ o , y `� �� i TORAC� �, _ , � _ `._� '
,
a i�H ` � �� �,'_ _ � , au� p ' ' �
f � G 5�_ID�� ���_��� ��_Z�� ,, ,,
� � � ,,,,,,,�,; zro, . � � . a-3 �eF KITCNEN ��� �� �� � �
1�,4R � 2fD6 5 �� 7ALL UTALL
�� J--�l(dl NOTH. � �� .�� U11TN OAK GAP I(I> -,,
209 - O GONFIRM ALL SINIG AND DISH � � � �� � �\
MINIMUM 5'-6" LONCs RUN OF BARTOP `� UTASNINCz REQUIREMENTS IUITI-1 i �� 4 -�' O `\
SHALL BE S$T AT MAX 34" TO ALLOW FOR R�� � � - IaEALTH DEPARTMENT i 2�� ��
ADA GOMPLIANCE ^ PROVIDE FLIP' TOP C:ATE TO BAR i i i -, MAX HEICsI-IT OP G 1 L BE 34" �� /�J
AREA. pETAILS TSD IN FIELD "
OEer ._ f "'...._i GO- PCs J �___� . ' . L7VW
.. �
` : ; _ _ .
� [ �
� ----••� __ �,: ; - - _, . . _
o __, _ , _ . - - - --
,---- _ _ ,-- ---_ ---_ _- _ O _--- --- --- `, _ -
. .
,- ; � �
� �_ : :
.
. . . . . . . . _ , . . _ , _ ,- . ,- ,
. �;
� , „ � ,� � , � , � -. ;
� � �
U U U U U U U U U � � � � � i� `9 LANDINCs , � � �� � � � � � � � �: �� � � �
_ � � � � ,
; �-,', �n UP _� � � i
-
� � , 5'-h"
- ARC,HITECTS LLC
� -^ � MAX RAMP 1:12
4� 9�� � :-_- ,
. _
� ;� .----,
s�a-riN� AR�a #� . � , , , ..--: � s�A-riN� ,�R�a � ' ' � 32 CHURCH ST. �
I(7�2 � % .-: � � � IfD� � � �
� ,. . � � % ; � � % ; � �'.--.� �„ HANDRAIL TO GOMPLY SALEM MA 01970
. N , . . . ., . . . � wiT+� ,a�� a�a �a�s . ' �--- � � .--- ' � � � � �-- � � '
_ ` _ ` = , . - _.; � � ___. � P978 _ 744 _ 8982
. . . ,. . ., ,, .
,' _., ;� ��, ,- ., ,,"., F978 744 0400
;� � ' � � `: l � � 1 � � ALICsN EDCzE OF LANDINCs i
�� � UlITN EDCsE OF COLUMN __
� � � � i'. ..�
> � � � DATE: JANUARY 17, 2�13
210 I INFILL DOOR. REPAIR
� / REVISIONS: ��BRUAi�Y 12, 2�13
��/ LANDLOR SI APPROVAL � ` ; � � • � � � % • �
' NOTE: �
. . � .; .._. ._.: .
�_. ._.% .
_ ' CON?RqGTOR TO P.ROVIDE SUBMITTAL. FOR _ � `
' / GEILING ASSEMBLY PRIOR TO CONSTR2UCTlON. �'� �'� � � �'�, !� � - � � �'�� ;'��� DRAWN BYi: RI"fc
GEILINCs SHALL GONSIS7 OF I HR RA7ECD � ; : � � :, ; � � : : �
ASSEMBLY WITN A MINIMUN STG R,4RIr1C's OF 5m. � DRAWING TITLE:
A �LOOfi� �L �41�1 . � f ��� �LOO�
a-2 ���,I��: ����� _ � � -��� �L �N
�
. ' WALL Tl'P� SYMBOL LEGEND ��NEi�,4L NOTES:
; "�r EXISTINCs TO REMAIN,
� FREE STANDINCs HAND SINK ALL EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION TO MEET BUILDINCz INDUSTRY
� _ '� %//////%//////� / PROPSED N�W IUALL � e o 3 SAI� SINK 57ANDARDS. GOORDINATE ALL NEW SYSTEMS WITN EXIStING TO
. - SUPPLY A COMPLETE, GODP CONFORMING, TU�I IGEY SYSTEM.
°� MOP SINIG ALL S7STEMS� 70 GONFORM TO ZfD�D9 IBG CW/ MASSAGHUSETTS
;.
-- REF REFRICtHRATO(� AMENDMENTSJ, GMR521, AND ALL APPLICABLE ADA COpES AND �A
` PROPOSED SQUAR� F007AC�s� r�aui�MeNrs. .
� FIRST �LOOR 1924 SQ. FT.. B�ER SEER COOLER UJ/ TAP LINES TNe u�E st,�eTY sYsr�rt sNou� is FOR scNErtaric us� or.i�Y. n`� �
- � �� � . �� - � � A D£51GN BUILD SYSTEM SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED '
' POOD PREP SIINK BY tNE CzENER4L CONTRAC70R TNE SYSTEM SNALL BE �i
� � � ; . � � �� . . - Af'PROVEp RY THE LOCAL PIRE DEPARTMENT AND CONNECTEp �
� TOTAL 1924 SQ. FT.. � REPRIC�ERAT ro tHe �ocA� �ir� a�a� sYsreM. : ,
. : ,
' Oi2 Cp „ GOUNtERTOP GONVEGTION OvEN ' �` - �
� A DESIGN BUILD ELEG7RIGAL SY9TEM SNALL BE SUPPLIED AND
INStALLED BY 7F{E fsENERQL GONtRQGTOR
OCCUPAN7 LOAD STUD1' � �ANNINI GRILL
` DRAIUINCsS FOR ALL DESICnN BUfLD SYSTEMS SNALL BE
!, SEATINC� AREA 'M nw I ' UNDERCOUNTER DISHWASHER SUBMITTED POR APPROVAL PRIOR 70 GONStRUCtION.
, � 540"SQ. FT. 3fo OCGUPANTS DC DISPLAY CASE ALL DOGUMENTATION REGtUIRED FOR AN ENERGY AUDI7 OR - DRAWING NUMBER:
� SEATINC4 A�ZEA �I i UNDERCOUNTER ICE 81N r--� OTN£12 STRETCF! GODE REQUIREMEN7S SNALL BE SUPPLIED
143 SQ. FT. 9 OGGUPANTS � � � � UNDERCOUNTEA� WAi�I"IINCz BIN AND GOORDINATED BY THE GENERAL GONTR4GTOR
EMPLOYEE AR�AS t-----�� �--J
1�3 SQ. FT. 4 OCCUPANTS MECI-IANIGAL ROOM TAC� �16 - DOOR tAC� •
TOTAL �9 OCCUF'ANTS ��d5
;:,:
CQ PITMAN a WARDLEY, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
_ - ---__-._. _----- --__ __ -- ' -
_
— ._ _ -- , .- _ ---
_ _. _ __--._. _____ _ --- _