Loading...
1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET ENF LEC Environmental Notification Form RECEIVED September3, 2019 SEP 0 51019 Project Site O HEAL F HEALTH 1-3 East Collins Street BOARDCITY Salem, Massachusetts Applicant New View Addiction Rehabilitation & Education Center, Inc. c/o Michael Mayer 11 Bay Street Beverly, Massachusetts 01915 Owner Mark Clifford 176 Lake Street Middleton, Massachusetts 01949 LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. 380 Lowell Street, Suite 101 Wakefield, Massachusetts 01880 781-245-2500; 781-245-6677 fax www.lecenvironmentaL com PLIrP.IOU)-" 1*11 LEC . OEM,W-�! September 3,2019 Hand Delivery Secretary Kathleen A. Theoharides Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston MA 02114 Re: Environmental Notification Form [LEC File#: .TMCG119-098.02] 1-3 East Collins Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Secretary: On behalf of the Project Proponent,New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc.,LEC Environmental Consultants,Inc., (LEC)is filing this Environmental Notification Form(ENF)in accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(M.G.L. c 30, s. 61-62H,MEPA)and the MEPA Regulations(301 CMR 11.00). The Project Proponent propose to raze an existing,underutilized and vacant former private social club building and remove associated asphalt parking lot and construct a much needed private addiction rehabilitation and educational center with a new paved parking lot and vegetated infiltration basin,and native landscaping on the above-referenced Project Site. The project requires a Superseding Order of Conditions and Chapter 91 Waterways License from MA DEP and exceeds the ENF review thresholds at CMR 11.03 (3)(b) 1 for the alteration of%acre or more of Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage and 301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)5. for a new nonwater-dependent use of filled tidelands. In accordance with 301 CMR 11.10 (7), a copy of this ENF filing has been circulated to the required Agencies/Reviewers(see distribution list). Full size site plans have been provided to MEPA,DEP, MAPC, and CZM. All others have been provided reduced size(l lxl7)site plans. Full size plans will be provided to any Agency upon request. DMF has been provided an electronic copy of the ENF. Notice of environmental review has been sent to the Salem News for publication on or before September 11,2019 as required at 301 CMR 11.15 (1)of the MEPA Regulations. It is our understanding this ENF will be noticed for Public Review in the Environmental Monitor on September 11,2019,beginning the 20-day comment period,which closes on October 1,2019, followed by a 10-day period for issuance of the ENF Certificate on October 11,2019. Should you have any questions regarding this filing,please do not hesitate to contact me in our Wakefield Office at 781-245-2500 or at amarton@lecenvironmental.com Sincerely, L Envl ental Consultants, Inc. A on,President Director of Ecological Services cc: New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc.;The Morin Cameron Group,Inc. LEC Environmental Consultants,Inc. www.lecenvironmental.com 12 Resnik Road 380 Lowell Street 100 Grove Street P.O.Box 590 Suite 1 Suite 101 Suite 302 Rindge,NH 03461 Plymouth,MA 02360 Wakefield,MA 01880 Worcester,MA 01605 508-746-9491 781-245-2500 508-753-3077 603-899-6726 508-746-9492(Fax) 781-245-6677(Fax) 508-753-3177(Fax) 603-899-6726(Fax) PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH I LEC Table of Contents Expanded Environmental Notification Form Distribution List Supplemental Information Report 1.0 SUMMARY 1 1.1 Project Summary 1 1.2 Summary of Required Reviews,Permits,Approvals,and Actions 1 1.3 Summary of Alternatives 2 1.4 Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation 2 2.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 3 2.1 Site Context 3 2.2 MA Natural Heritage&Endangered Species Program Designation 4 2.3 Wetland Resource Areas 4 2.3.1 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 4 2.3.2 Coastal Beach 5 2.3.3 Coastal Dune 5 2.3.4 Coastal Bank 5 2.3.5 Salt Marsh 6 2.3.6 Off-Site Wetlands 6 2.4 Commonwealth Filled Tidelands 6 3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 3.1 Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center,Parking,and Site Access 7 3.2 Landscaping and Waterfront Access g 3.3 Stormwater Management g 3.4 Utilities and Snow Removal 9 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS g 4.1 No Build Scenario 10 4.2 Multi Family Residential 10 4.3 Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center Concept Plan 1 10 4.4 Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center Concept Plan 2 11 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS & MITIGATION 11 6.0 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE/GENERAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 12 6.1 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage(LSCSF)310 CMR 10.04 12 6.2 Chapter 91 Waterways License 13 6.2.1 310 CMR 9.31 (2)(b)Nonwater-dependent Use Projects 13 6.2.2 310 CMR 9.51 for Conservation of Capacity for Water-Dependent Use 14 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH I 1 i I i ,. �� � _ }.a� - I � LEC Table of Contents 6.2.3 310 CMR 9.52 for Utilization of Shoreline for Water-dependent Purposes 15 6.2.4 310 CMR 9.54 for Consistency with Coastal Zone Management Policies 16 Literature Cited Appendices Appendix A Locus Maps Figure 1: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Figure 2: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Figure 3: MassGIS Orthophoto Map and NHESP Map Appendix B Order of Conditions,Issued by the Salem Conservation Commission,Dated August 14, 2019 Request for Superseding Order of Conditions,Filed by Scott Truhart and Citizen Group, Received by MADEP NERO on August 22,2019 Appendix C Reduced Size 11x17 Plan Sets Civil Plans Site Redevelopment Plans, 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA Prepared for New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. (Sheets C-1 through C-8,and L-1),prepared by The Morin Cameron Group,Inc. dated July 22,2019,last revised August 15,2019 Architectural Plans New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center, Inc., 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheets A-1.1 through A-2.4),prepared by Bisbano&Associates,Inc.,dated August 15, 2019 Appendix D Reduced Size 11x17 Plan Sets Stormwater Management Report Site Redevelopment Plans 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group,Inc.,dated July 22, 2019 WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH LEC Table of Contents Appendix E Reduced Size 11x17 Plan Sets Site Plan of Land, 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheet 1 of 1),prepared by The Morin Cameron Group,Inc.,dated October 18,2016 January 4,2017 City of Salem Board of Appeals Variance and Special Permit Concept Plan 1 Site Plan of Land 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheet 1 of 1),prepared by The Morin Cameron Group, Inc., dated February 22,2019 Concept 2 Site Plan of Land 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheet 1 of 1),prepared by The Morin Cameron Group,Inc.,dated March 1,2019 Attachments Full-Size Plan Set Site Redevelopment Plans 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group,Inc. PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(MEPA) Office Environmental Notification Form For Office Use Only EEA#: MEPA Analyst: The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: New View Addiction Rehabilitation & Education Center, Inc. Street Address: 1-3 Collins Street Municipality: Salem Watershed: North Coastal Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: 42d 31' 56.17" Longitude: 70d 53' 08.70" Estimated commencement date: April 2020 Estimated completion date: Sept. 2021 Project Type: Rehabilitation Center Status of project design: 75 %complete Proponent: New View Addiction Rehabilitation & Education Center, Inc. Street Address: c/o Michael Meyer 11 Bay Street Municipality: Beverly State: MA Zip Code: 01915 Name of Contact Person: Ann M. Marton Firm/Agency: LEC Environmental Street Address: 380 Lowell Street, Suite 101 Municipality: Wakefield State: MA I Zip Code: 01880 Phone: 781-245-2500 1 Fax: 781-245-6677 E-ma!I:ama rto n!2lecenvi ron mental.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ❑Yes ®No If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) or a Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes ®No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) ❑Yes ®No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ®No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ®No (Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF.) Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)? 301 CMR 11.03 (3) (b) 1. f. Alteration of% acre or more of any other wetlands (LSCSF) 301 CMR 11.03 (3) (b) 5 New nonwater-dependent use Which State Agency Permits will the project require? Chapter 91 Waterways License from MADEP Superseding Order of Conditions from MADEP Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth, including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: None. Effective January 2011 Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total 8i Environmental Impacts Total site acreage New acres of land altered 0 Acres of impervious area ` {}��'; -.0at 0.32 Square feet of new bordering 0 vegetated wetlands alteration Square feet of new other wetland 20,690E alteration �scsF Acres of new non-water dependent 0 use of tidelands or waterways Gross square footage 5,240E 9,340E 14,580t Number of housing units ° Maximum height(feet) 8 26• 34.2E TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day 150 Parking spaces 38 -20 1$ WASTEWATER 3,i�nn_ f3,750 6,750t Water Use (Gallons per day) Water withdrawal (GPD) 0 0 0 Wastewater generation/treatment 3,000E f3,750 6,750E (GPD) Length of water mains (miles) 0 0 0 Length of sewer mains (miles) 0 0 0 Has this project been filed with MEPA before? [:] Yes (EEA# ) ®No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? ❑ Yes (EEA# ) ®No, not to our knowledge. -2- GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION - all proponents must fill out this section PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site: The site contains an abandoned commercial building formerly utilized as a restaurant/function hall with paved parking at the front of the building to the west, and along the side and rear of the building to the north and east, portions of which extend northerly onto the adjacent off-site National Grid property. South of the existing building, a strip of overgrown manicured grass and overgrown landscaping extends along the southerly property line. A small man-made berm, protected as a Coastal Bank, extends along the easterly limits of development, with additional Coastal Wetland Resource Areas associated with the shoreline of Collins Cove located east of the Coastal Bank. A small footpath extends from the edge of pavement over the Coastal Bank and onto the Coastal Beach. Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements: The proposed project involves razing the existing vacant structure and constructing a new three-story structure with a slightly smaller footprint, reconfiguring the parking and walkways, resulting in a decrease in impervious cover by 2,740E sf, removing of 3,766E sf of pavement converted to naturalized plantings, native landscape plantings around the building, a vegetated stormwater management system, and creation of a 5-foot wide paved pathway providing public access from Collins Street to the waterfront. All work occurs within the existing disturbed edge of existing parking lot. NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project's direct and indirect impacts (including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent, duration and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these requirements into the future. Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning, and the reasons(s)that they were not selected as the preferred alternative: The Project Proponent considered the no-build alternative, multi-family residential, and two alternative layouts for an addiction rehabilitation and education center. See Section 4.0 and Appendix E of the ENF Report for additional detail. NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters and/or siting of a project, or components thereof, will have on the environment, keeping in mind that the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations, alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations. Summarize the mitigation measures proposed to offset the impacts of the preferred alternative: As a result of the decrease in total impervious coverage on the site, the project qualifies as a redevelopment project under the DEP Stormwater Management Handbook. However, the project fully complies with the Handbook. Proposed drainage conditions will substantially match the existing drainage patterns to ensure no adverse off-site impacts. Peak rates and volume runoff will be reduced due to the 2,740E sf decrease in impervious cover. Water quality will be enhanced by removing 3,766E sf of pavement and installing a naturally vegetated -3- stormwater infiltration basin and sediment forebay. The first floor elevation of the proposed structure will be elevation 11.5, 1.5 feet above the 100-year flood elevation. The structure will connect to existing sewer, water, gas, and electric services extending to the site. According to preliminary meetings with the City and utility providers, all utilities are adequate. To the extent that the attendant utility and sanitary facilities are below elevation 10, they will be water tight and flood proof. If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase: The project will not be constructed in phases. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project within or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes(Specify ®No if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan?_Yes _No; If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan. Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC?_Yes ® No; If yes, describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoff/discharge to the designated ACEC. RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species? (see http://www:mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/priority_habitat_home.htm) []Yes(Specify__ ) ®No HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? []Yes (Specify ) ®No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes(Specify l ❑No WATER RESOURCES: Is there an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? Yes ®No; if yes, identify the ORW and its location. (NOTE: Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies, their tributaries, and bordering wetlands, active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP,certain waters within Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.) Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? ®Yes_No; if yes, identify the water body and pollutant(s)causing the impairment: Beverly Harbor MA93-20 Cate-gory 4a Fecal Coliform EPA TMDL No.50122. Is the project within a medium or high stress basin, as established by the Massachusetts Water Resources Commission? Yes ® No STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Generally describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations: Under existing conditions,stormwater ponds on the property due to a failing catch basin and outfall in the southern portion of the site or flows overland unabated and untreated either towards Collins Cove or towards East Collins Street. As a redevelopment project under the DEP Stormwater Management Standards,the project has been designed to mitigate for post-development runoff and maintain existing -4- Drainage patterns to effectively and efficiently convey runoff in the context of the existing urban filled tidelands. Due to the on-site fill material, traditional infiltration is not suitable. Runoff from the site will sheet flow across the parking lot and discharge to the proposed sediment forebay and vegetative infiltration basin. All discharges are properly treated,will not cause erosion,and represent an improvement over existing conditions as described in greater detail in the attached Stormwater Management Report prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. dated July 22,2019. MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN: Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan?_Yes ® No; if yes, please describe the current status of the site (including Release Tracking Number(RTN), cleanup phase, and Response Action Outcome classification): Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL)on any portion of the project site?_Yes ® No; if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL: Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN? Yes ® No; if yes, please describe: SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE: If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction, describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal of, e.g., asphalt, brick, concrete, gypsum, metal, wood: The Project Proponent will raze the existing one-story building and remove existing asphalt. All demolition and disposal will be conducted in accordance with the Solid Waste Management Regulations(310 CMR 19.017)for reuse, recycling or disposal. (NOTE:Asphalt pavement, brick, concrete and metal are banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills. See 310 CMR 19.017 for the complete list of banned materials.) Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials?_Yes ® No; Not that we are currently aware of, but should asbestos be encountered, it will be removed in full compliance with all federal,state, and local requirements. if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at hftD:Hmass.gov/MassDEP/air/asbhom0l.htm Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment: During construction,contractors will be required to adhere to Massachusetts General Law Ch. 90, Section 16A and 3.10 CMR 7.11,which prohibits the idling of engines of stopped vehicles in excess of five minutes except for concrete trucks which are excluded from this requirement while mixing and pouring concrete. DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER: Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated Scenic River?_Yes ® No; if yes, specify name of river and designation: If yes, does the project have the potential to impact any of the"outstandingly remarkable" resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River? Yes _No _; if yes, specify name of river and designation: ; if yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated"outstandingly remarkable" resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River. Yes _No _; if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the"outstandingly remarkable" resources or stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed. -5- ATTACHMENTS: 1. List of all attachments to this document. 2. U.S.G.S. map(good quality color copy, 8'/z x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000) indicating the project location and boundaries. 3.. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate environs, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, railroad rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies,wooded areas,farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. 4 Plan, at an appropriate scale, depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the project site such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species,Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas,Article 97 lands, wetland resource area delineations,water supply protection areas, and historic resources and/or districts. 5. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of the project is proposed to be phased,there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). 6. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). 7. List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable. -6- LAND SECTION — all proponents must fill out this section I. Thresholds/Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land(see 301 CMR 11.03(1) _Yes ® No; if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Change Total Internal roadways 0 0 0 Parking and other paved areas 0.28 -0.09 0.19 Other altered areas(landscaping/stormwater) 0.01 -0.10 0.11 Undeveloped areas 0.55 0 0.55 Total: Project Site Acreage 0.96 0 0.96 B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years? Yes ® No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use(with prime state or locally important agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? _Yes ® No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97?_Yes ® No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?_ Yes® No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? _Yes_No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _Yes ® No; if yes, describe: G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B?_Yes ® No; if yes, describe: Ill. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan Title:City of Salem Master Plan and Update Plan Date 1996 Title: City of Salem Open Space and Recreation Plan Update 2015-2022 Date 2015 B. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development The project will result in redevelopment of a long vacant underutilized parcel generating increased property tax revenue for the City of Salem while at the same time addressing a much needed resource for in-patient substance abuse treatment. 2) adequacy of infrastructure The treatment facility will tie into existing, sewer,water, gas, and electric services extending to the site. According to preliminary -7- meetings with the City and utility providers, all utilities are adequate. 3) open space impacts Redevelopment of this parcel will result in a decrease in impervious cover by 2,740f sf and the removal of 3,766f sf of pavement converted to naturalized plantings and creation of a 4-foot wide paved pathway providing public access from Collins Street to the waterfront. 4) comp atibilit with adjacent land uses The exterior of the proposed in-patient treatment facility has been designed to fit into the surrounding residential neighborhood with parking at the rear of the building and screened from Collins Street. C. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency(RPA) RPA: Metropolitan Area Planning Council Title: Metropolitan Area Plannina Council Regional Plan Date May 2008 D. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic develo ment The project will result in redevelopment of a long vacant underutilized parcel generating increased property tax revenue for the City of Salem while at the same time addressing a much needed resource for in-patient substance abuse treatment. 2) adecLuac of infrastructure The treatment facility will tie into existing,sewer,water, gas,and electric services extending to the site. According to preliminary meetings with the City and utility providers, all utilities are adequate 3) open space impacts Redevelopment of this parcel will result in the conversion of 2,740f sf of pavement to naturalized plantings and creation of a 4-foot wide paved pathway providing public access from Collins Street to the waterfront. -8- RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat(see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: (NOTE:If you are uncertain, it is recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program(NHESP)prior to submitting the ENF.) B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? _Yes ® No C. Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat(Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas(attach relevant page)? _Yes ® No. D. If you answered "No"to all questions A, B and C, proceed to the Wetlands,Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes_No. If yes, 1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? _Yes No; if yes, have you received a determination as to whether the project will result in the"take"of a rare species? _ Yes_No; if yes, attach the letter of determination to this submission. 2. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131 A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes_No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts 3. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat? 4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act? —Yes_No 4. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? _Yes_No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? _Yes_No B. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes _No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant habitat: -9- WETLANDS. WATERWAYS AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands,waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? ®Yes_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: 11.03(3)(b)5 New non-water dependent use B. Does the project require any state permits(or a local Order of Conditions)related to wetlands, waterways,or tidelands? ®Yes_No; if yes, specify which permit: Chapter 91 Waterway License C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. II.Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c.131A)? ®Yes_No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed? ®Yes_No; if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number: 7-22-19 DEP File#64-0681 ; if yes, has a local Order of Conditions been issued? ®Yes(OOC issued on 8-14-191_No;Was the Order of Conditions appealed? ®Yes No. Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations?_Yes ® No. B. Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on the project site: Work will occur within 20,500E sf of Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage. C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area(square feet) or Temporary or Length [linear feet) Permanent Im act? Land Under the Ocean Designated Port Areas Coastal Beaches Coastal Dunes Barrier Beaches Coastal Banks _ Rocky Intertidal Shores Salt Marshes Land Under Salt Ponds Land Containing Shellfish Fish Runs Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 20.690E 20.690E Inland Wetlands Bank(If) Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Isolated Vegetated Wetlands Land under Water Isolated Land Subject to Flooding Borderi ng Land Subject to Flooding Riverfront Area -10- D. Is any part of the project: 1. proposed as a limited project? _Yes ® No; if yes,what is the area(in sf)? 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _Yes ® No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? _Yes ® No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? Yes ® No; if yes, describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)or an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? _Yes ® No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? _Yes ® No; if yes, identify the area(in sf): 7. located in buffer zones? ®Yes No; if yes, how much (in sf) 14,890 sf E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? ®Yes_No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law? _Yes ® No; if yes,what is the area(sf)? III.Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands(including filled former tidelands)that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? ®Yes_No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the project site? Yes ® No; if yes, list the date and license or permit number and provide a copy of the historic map used to determine extent of filled tidelands: Filled Tideland determined based on MassDEP Inferred Historic High Water Line The Project Proponent is not aware of any current or former Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the site. B. Does the project require anew or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91? ®Yes_No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water-dependent use? Current 0.28 Change 0 Total 0.28 If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures (in sf)? 2,946±sf footprint solid fill structure C. For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following: Area of filled tidelands on the site:11,740f sf Area of filled tidelands covered by buildings: 3 296t sf(including eaves or overhanas For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use: Entry/Reception/Patient Intake 1.023f sf Administrative Office 1 139f sf Kitchen/Dining/Meeting Room/Restrooms 369f sf Mechanical/Elevator/Stairs 431f sf Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands? _Yes ® No Height of building on filled tidelands 34.2 ft Also show the following on a site plan: Mean High Water, Mean Low Water,Water- dependent Use Zone, location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low water marks. D. Is the project located on landlocked tidelands? _Yes ® No; if yes, describe the project's impact on the public's right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: E. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a -11 - municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations? Yes ® No; if yes, describe the projects impact on groundwater levels and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: F. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory EIR?_Yes ® No; (NOTE.if yes, then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and Determination.) G. Does the project include dredging?_Yes ® No; if yes, answer the following questions: What type of dredging? Improvement_Maintenance_Both What is the proposed dredge volume, in cubic yards (cys) What is the proposed dredge footprint length(ft) width(ft) depth (ft); Will dredging impact the following resource areas? Intertidal Yes_ No_; if yes,_sq ft Outstanding Resource Waters Yes_ No_; if yes,_sq ft Other resource area(i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds) Yes_ No_; if yes sq ft If yes to any of the above, have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps to: 1)avoidance; 2) if avoidance is not possible, minimization; 3)if either avoidance or minimize is not possible, mitigation? If no to any of the above, what information or documentation was used to support this determination? Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b). Physical and chemical data of the sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis. Sediment Characterization Existing gradation analysis results? Yes No: if yes, provide results. Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6?_Yes No; if yes, provide results. Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management options for dredged sediment? If yes, check the appropriate option. Beach Nourishment_ Unconfined Ocean Disposal Confined Disposal: Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD)_ Confined Disposal Facility(CDF)_ Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001 — Shoreline Placement_ Upland Material Reuse In-State landfill disposal Out-of-state landfill disposal (NOTE. This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.) IV. Consistency: A. Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located within the Coastal Zone? ®Yes_No; if yes, describe these effects and the projects consistency with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: The Project is located within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage(elevation 10 NGVD88). The new building will be constructed with a first floor elevation of 11.5. All mechanicals will be elevated at least 1.5 feet above elevation 10. B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _Yes® No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: -12- WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply(see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons per day(gpd), the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existinq Change Total Municipal or regional water supply Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer (NOTE.lnterbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater from the source will be discharged.) B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project?_Yes_No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, has a pumping test been conducted? _Yes_No; if yes, attach a map of the drilling sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results. D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons per day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal? Yes _No; if yes, then how much of an increase (gpd)? __ __ E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Flow Daily Flow Capacity of water supply well(s)(gpd) Capacity of water treatment plant(gpd) F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved,what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve: 1. new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district? _Yes_No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _Yes_No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking -13- water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? —Yes_No 111. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality,facilities and services: - 14- WASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation--Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. ll. Impacts and Permits A. Describe the volume(in gallons per day)and type of disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site(calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems): Existing Change Total Discharge of sanitary wastewater Discharge of industrial wastewater TOTAL Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater facility TOTAL B. Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity? —Yes_No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity?_Yes_No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No; if yes, describe as follows: Permitted Existing Avg Proiect Flow Total Daily Flow_ Wastewater treatment plant capacity (in gallons per day) E. If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater,which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new? -15- (NOTE:Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is located.) F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA)or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? _Yes_No G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, wastewater reuse(gray water)or other sewage residual materials? _Yes_No; if yes, what is the capacity(tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage Treatment Processing Combustion _ Disposal H. Describe the water conservation measures_ to be undertaken by the project, and other wastewater mitigation, such as infiltration and inflow removal. III. Consistency A. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: B. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? _Yes_No; if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan and whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that plan: -16- TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION) I. Thresholds/Permit A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways?_Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. 11. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces Number of vehicle trips per day ITE Land Use Code(s): B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadwav Existing Change Total 1. 2. 3. C. If applicable, describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways that the project proponent will implement: D. How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and services to provide access to and from the project site? C. Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA)that provides transportation demand management(TDM)services in the area of the project site? Yes No; if yes, describe if and how will the project will participate in the TMA: D. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation facilities? Yes No; if yes, generally describe: E. If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CMR 111.7)and a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (CFR Title 14 Part 77.13,forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)? III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: - 17- TRANSPORTATION SECTION ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities(see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II.Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site: B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain(in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees(number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? III. Consistency--Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: -18- ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy(see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Capacity of electric generating facility(megawatts) Length of fuel line(in miles) Length of transmission lines (in miles) Capacity of transmission lines(in kilovolts) B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are: 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes_No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: - 19- AIR QUALITY SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality(see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. 11. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source(see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?_Yes_No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions(in tons per day)of: Existing Change Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen Lead _ Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III.Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: 20 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION I. Thresholds 1 Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste(see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _Yes ® No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? _Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste?_Yes_No; if yes, what is the volume(in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing T Combustion _ Disposal B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste?_Yes_No; if yes, what is the volume(in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Recycling Treatment Disposal C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? Yes No E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts(including indirect impacts): III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: 21 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I. Thresholds/Impacts A. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? _Yes® No; if yes, attach correspondence. For project sites involving lands under water, have you consulted with the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources? Yes ® No; if yes, attach correspondence B. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes_No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? _Yes_No; if yes, please describe: C. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? Yes No; if yes, please describe: D. If you answered "No"to all parts of both questions A, B and C, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes"to any part of either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. II. Impacts Describe and assess the project's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: 22 CERTIFICATIONS: 1• The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1): (Name) Beverly Citizen DDate) 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). Sign ures: Da Signature of Responsible Officer Date S1 re of person preparing or Proponent ENF(if different from above) Martin A. Bloom Ann M. Marton President Name(print or type) Name (print or type) Beveriv Restaurant Association LLC LEC Environmental Consultants Inc. Firm/Agency Firm/Agency 50 Libert Drive Unit 5D 380 Lowell Street Suite 101 Street Street Boston MA 02210 Wakefield MA 01880 Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip Phone Phone 781-245-2500 22 i1 1 1 II i �� r I ENF Distribution List 1-3 East Collins Street Salem, Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy&Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection Attn: MEPA Office Commissioner's Office 100 Cambridge Street,Suite 9 One Winter Street Boston, MA 02114 Boston, MA 02108 DEP, Northeast Regional Office Massachusetts Department of Transportation Attn: MEPA Coordinator Public/Private Development Unit 205E Lowell Street 10 Park Plaza,Suite#4150 Wilmington, MA 01887 Boston, MA 02116 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Massachusetts Historical Commission District#4 The MA Archives Building Attn: MEPA Coordinator 220 Morrissey Boulevard 519 Appleton Street Boston, MA 02125 Arlington, MA 02476 Metropolitan Area Planning Council Salem City Council 60 Temple Place,6th Floor City Hall Boston, MA 02111 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Salem Planning Board Salem Conservation Commission City Hall City Hall Annex 93 Washington Street 98 Washington Street,Second Floor Salem, MA 01970 Salem, MA 01970 Salem Health Department Coastal Zone Management City Hall Annex Attn: Project Review Coordinator 98 Washington Street,Third Floor 251 Causeway Street,Suite 800 Salem, MA 01970 Boston, MA 02114 Division of Marine Fisheries(North Shore) Attn: Environmental Reviewer 30 Emerson Avenue Gloucester, MA 01930 (DMF.EnvReview-North@state.ma.us) I ►. 1 �I � LEC Environmental Notification Form Supplemental Report 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts September 3;2019 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH I ' I I I I II I I � . ��l �i . � � LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts 1. Summary The following provides a brief summary of the Proposed Project; summary of required reviews,permits,approvals,and actions; a summary of the alternatives,and a summary of potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures. 1.1 Project Summary The Project Proponent propose to raze an existing,underutilized and vacant former Ward 2 private social club and remove existing asphalt parking surrounding the building, and construct a new,three story private addiction rehabilitation and educational center with a slightly smaller building footprint than under existing conditions; construct a new reconfigured paved parking lot at the rear of the Project Site; abandon the existing failing catch basin and outfall structure and replace it with a vegetated sediment forebay and infiltration basin; construct a 5-foot wide stone dust pathway to provide public access from East Collins Street to the waterfront; and install landscape with native plantings. All work occurs within the existing disturbed edge of existing paved parking lot. 1.2 Summary of Required Reviews, Permits, Approvals, and Actions The Proposed Project will require filing for several local and state permits and approvals, a few of which have already been filed. In advance of permit filings,the project design team met informally on June 13,2019 for a Pre-Application Review with Chrissy Hopps and Frank Taormina of DEP Waterways to discuss waterways jurisdiction and general compliance for the proposed use within filled Tidelands. On July 24,2019,the project design team also met informally with City of Salem Staff/Departments for their initial review and comment. On July 25, 2019,the Project Proponent filed a Notice of Intent(NOI)Application with the Salem Conservation Commission(DEP File#: 64-0681). A Site Walk was conducted with Conservation Agent on July 31, 2019,and the Commission held a Public Hearing on August 8,2019. The Commission voted to close the Public Hearing and issue an Order of Conditions(OOC)approving the project at the August 8,2019 Public Hearing. An OOC approving the project was issued by the Commission on August 14,2019 (Appendix B). A Request for Superseding OOC was filed with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MADEP)by a 10-citizen group and received Page 1 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts by MADEP on August 22,2019 (Appendix B). DEP has accepted the appeal and scheduled a Site Visit for September 12,2019. On August 15,2019 the Project Proponent filed with the Salem Planning Board for Site Plan Review and a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Permit/Approval Agency Status Local Order of Conditions Salem Conservation Order of Conditions issued Commission August 14,2019 Site Plan Review&Flood Salem Planning Board Submitted August 15, 2019 Hazard Overlay District first Public Hearing Scheduled for Special Permit September 19,2019 Building Permits Salem Building Inspector Prior to Construction State Superseding Order of MA DEP-Wetlands and Site Visit Scheduled for Conditions Waterways September 12,2019 Chapter 91 Waterways MADEP-Waterways Filing Planned October 2019 License Program Table 1.1 Required Environmental Reviews, Permits,Approvals or Action 1.3 Summary of Alternatives The Project Proponent has considered 4 alternatives to the Preferred Project. The no- build alternative has been in place over the past 5+years which is infeasible. In 2016 the Project Proponent originally considered Multi-Family Residential(8 units)with a ZBA filing. The ZBA granted a Variance and Special Permit that was subsequently appealed. The Project Proponent is currently proposing redevelopment of the parcel as an addiction rehabilitation and education center. The Project Proponent evaluated two Concept plans before selecting the Preferred Plan, Section 4.0 provides a more detailed discussion of the alternatives considered with a more detailed discussion of the Preferred Plan in Section 3.0. 1.4 Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation The Proposed Project will raze the existing underutilized and vacant building and construct a new building, compliant with current state building code for construction in the floodplain. The project will result in a slight reduction in the building footprint,a 2,750f sf reduction in impervious surface, and 3,766t sf reduction in pavement Page 2 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA NH I I �1 �f 1 _ I ti LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts converted to native landscape plantings and creation of a 5-foot wide public access pathway from East Collins Street to the waterfront. The Project Proponent's civil engineer,The Morin Cameron Group,Inc.has evaluated pre- and post-development drainage patterns and prepared a comprehensive stormwater management plan that complies with the DEP Stormwater Management Guidelines and 310 CMR 10.05 (6)(k)of the Wetlands Protection Act Regulations. The project qualifies as a redevelopment under the DEP Stormwater Handbook; however,the project fully complies with the handbook. Proposed drainage conditions will substantially match the existing drainage patterns to ensure no adverse off-site impacts. Peak rates.and volume runoff will be reduced due to the 2,740E sf decrease in impervious cover. Water quality will be enhanced by removing 3,766t sf of pavement and installing a naturally vegetated stormwater infiltration basin and sediment forebay. The Project Proponent has incorporated efforts to avoid,minimize,and mitigate for impacts to coastal wetlands by limiting,all work to the footprint of the existing disturbed edge of the parking lot. The project fully complies with the relevant local, state,and federal wetland protection performance standards. The following narrative includes a description of the Existing Environment,Proposed Project,Alternatives Analysis,and Regulatory Compliance/General Performance Standards. 2. Existing Environment The following provide a description of the site context and general site description,the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Endangered Species Program (NHESP)Designation, Wetland Resource Areas,and Commonwealth Filled Tidelands. 2.1 Site Context The 41,834E square foot Project Site is located at 1-3 East Collins Street(Assessor's Map 36, Lot 277), southeast of the intersection of East Collins Street and Planters Street in Salem,Massachusetts(Attachment A,Figures 1 and 3). The Project Site contains an abandoned commercial building formerly utilized as a restaurant/function hall with paved parking along the front of the building to the west, and along the side and rear of the building to the north and east,portions of which extend northerly onto the adjacent off- site National Grid property. South of the existing building,a strip of overgrown manicured grass and overgrown landscaping extends along the southerly property line. A small man-made berm,protected as a Coastal Bank, extends along the easterly limits of Page 3 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH i i �� L I. . �. �� �� d� I � LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts development,with additional Coastal Wetland Resource Areas associated with the shoreline of Collins Cove located east of the Coastal Bank. A small footpath extends from the edge of pavement over the Coastal Bank and onto the Coastal Beach. Properties south and west of the Project Site include primarily single and multi-family residential development with scattered commercial development. Property to the north/northeast includes a paved parking/access drive contiguous with the on-site parking,-extending parallel to the northerly property line. An unpaved accessway extends from East Collins Street toward the National Grid facility located more than 300-feet north of the Project Site. Immediately north/northeast of the paved parking,the National Grid property contains undeveloped freshwater wetlands, coastal wetlands, and uplands (Appendix A,Figures 1 and 3). 2.2 MA Natural Heritage $ Endangered Species Program Designation According to the 14th Edition(August 1,2017)of the NHESP Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas,the Project Site is not located within an Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife or Priority Habitat for Rare Species(Attachment A,Figure 3). In addition, there are no mapped certified or potential vernal pools on or proximate to the Project Site. 2.3 Wetland Resource Areas LEC conducted a site evaluation on May 21,2019 to determine the boundaries of Wetland Resource Areas present on or immediately adjacent to the property. LEC determined that five Coastal Wetland Resource Areas are located on the property and a freshwater wetland appears to occur off-site to the north. The boundaries of the Coastal Wetland Resource Areas were determined based on the regulatory definitions under 310 CMR 10.04, 10.27, 10.28, 10.30,and 10.32 under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(the Act,M.G.L. c. 131, s. 40),its implementing Regulations(Act Regulations, 310 CMR 10.00), as further described below. The City of Salem Wetlands Protection and Conservation Ordinance(the Salem Ordinance)does not contain definitions or delineation criteria for Coastal Wetland Resource Areas;therefore,the following focuses on the Act Regulations. 2.3.1 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowa e LSCSF) According to 310 CMR 10.04, Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage means land subject to any inundation caused by coastal storms up to and including that caused by the 100 year storm, surge of record or storm of record, whichever is greater, Page 4 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA I 1 l,. �� LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 Fast Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts According to the July 16,2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM) for Essex County, Massachusetts(Community Panel 25009C 0417 G),the Project Site is located within a mapped Zone AE(el. 10)Areas subject to inundation by the 1%change annual flood. Since the entire property lies below elevation 10,the entire Project Site is within LSCSF. 2.3.2 Coastal Beach According to 310 CMR 10.27(2), Coastal Beach means unconsolidated sediment subject to wave, tidal and coastal storm action which forms the gently sloping shore of a body of salt water and includes tidal flats. Coastal Beaches extend from the mean low water line - landward to the dune line, coastal bank line or the seaward edge of existing human-made structures, when these structures replace one of the above lines, whichever is closest to the ocean. Coastal Beach is part of the Coastal Wetland Resource Area complex extending onto the eastern portion of the property. The Coastal Beach occurs between the delineated Coastal Dune and Salt Marsh,as described below,and is composed of unconsolidated sand with numerous shells, shell fragments, stones, and pieces of asphalt. 2.3.3 Coastal Dune Coastal Dune is defined at 310 CMR 10.28(2) as any natural hill, mound or ridge of sediment landward of a coastal beach deposited by wind action or storm overwash. Coastal dune also means sediment deposited by artificial means and serving the purpose of storm damage prevention or flood control. Two non-contiguous Coastal Dunes are located upgradient of the Coastal Beach and Salt Marsh. The Coastal Dune is partially vegetated with beachgrass(Ammophila breviligulata), seaside goldenrod(Solidago sempervirens),and phragmites(Phragmites australis). The remainder and majority of the Dune is open,unconsolidated sand with shell fragments and small stones. The Coastal Dune is delineated by flags CD 1 —CD 4 and CD 5—CD 11. 2.3.4 Coastal Bank According to 310 CMR 10.30(2), Coastal Bank is the seaward face or side of any elevated landform, other than a Coastal Dune, which lies at the landward edge of a Coastal Beach, land subject to tidal action, or other wetland. The man-made earthen berm southeast of the existing,on-site parking lot meets the definition of a Coastal Bank The Top of Coastal Bank was delineated in accordance with Page 5 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA i .c �� — � i . � � I . — '1 � �l a LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem Massachusetts DEP's Program Policy 92-1, and includes areas with slopes that are greater than 10:1 (i.e. greater than a 10%slope). The Coastal Bank is non-eroding and stabilized with vegetation including bayberry(Myrica pennsylvanica)and beach plum(Prunus maritima)shrubs,and various grasses and weeds. 2.3.5 Salt Marsh According to 310 CMR 10.32(2), Salt Marsh means a coastal wetland that extends landward up the highest high tide line, that is, the highest spring tide of the year, and is characterized by plants that are well adapted to or prefer living in, saline soils. Dominant plants within salt marsh are salt meadow cord grass(Spartina patens)and/or salt marsh cord grass(Spartina alterniflora). A salt marsh may contain tidal creeks, ditches and pools. The Salt Marsh was delineated with flags SM 1 —SM 23. Dominant plants include salt marsh cord grass(Spartina alterniora), salt meadow cord grass(Spartina patens), and black grass(Juncus gerardii)with scattered individuals of high-tide bush(Iva frutescens) and seaside goldenrod in the upper reaches. The patch of Salt Marsh delineated with flags SM 24 and SM 25 is dominated by phragmites(Phragmites australis). 2.3.6 Off-Site Wetlands Based on the MassGIS DEP Wetlands Datalayers (Attachment A)and observations from the Project Site, an off-site wetland extends within 20f feet of the northeastern comer of the Project Site. LEC did not obtain access authorization from National Grid,but managed to view the wetland from the property line. It was not possible to determine if this wetland is isolated or borders on a waterbody;however, since the Salem Ordinance protects both bordering and isolated wetlands,it has been depicted on the plans with a 100-foot Buffer Zone. 2.4 Commonwealth Filled Tidelands While Chapter 91 jurisdiction typically includes areas seaward of Mean High Water (MHW),which is located off-site at elevation 4.3,a portion of the existing development lies within the DEP Presumptive Historic High Water Line(Attachment A,Figure 3). As a result, any activities located seaward of the Presumptive Historic High Water Line are subject to the Chapter 91 Waterways Regulations, specifically regulated as Filled Tidelands. According to 310 CMR 9.02 of the Waterways Regulations,Filled Tidelands means former submerged lands and tidal flats which are no longer subject to the tidal action due to the presence of fill. The landward boundary of filled tidelands is dictated Page 6 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA i i �> 1 - .I 1 1 . �� H 1 _ ,� I� If LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts by the Historic High Water Mark which means the high water mark which existed prior to human alteration of the shoreline....and is the farthest landward former shoreline which can be ascertained with reference to topographic or hydrographic surveys, previous license plans, and other historic maps or charts...or by utilizing the MassGIS DEP Presumptive Historic High Water Line. Based on the DEP Presumptive Historic High Water Line, 11,740f sf of the Project Site is located within Filled Tidelands. The Waterways Regulations establish a Water-dependent Use Zone(WDUZ)and a Facility of Public Accommodation(FPA)that place limitations or requirements on certain uses. On this site,the Water-dependent Use Zone extends 60.8f liner feet landward from MHW and the FPA extends 100 feet landward of the MHW. Both of these boundaries fall within the confines of the previously described Coastal Beach; Coastal Dune,and Salt Marsh. No work is proposed within the WDUZ or the FPA. 3. Proposed Project The Project Proponent proposes to raze an existing,underutilized and vacant former private social club building and remove an associated asphalt parking lot, and construct a much needed private addiction rehabilitation and education center with a new paved parking lot,vegetated infiltration basin,native landscaping, and public access to the waterfront from East Collins Street. 3.1 Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center, Parking, and Site Access The Project Proponent proposes to construct a new,three story private addiction rehabilitation and educational center(4,860f sf footprint)within a slightly smaller building footprint than the existing building(5,240f sf footprint). The primary building entrance, including handicap access,will be from the rear of the building adjacent to the parking lot. Residential style architecture will be used to conform to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. A new external lighting system will be installed comprised of pole-mounted fixtures in the parking lot and new wall sconces mounted to the building. A new,20-foot wide two-way driveway is proposed along the western property boundary, directing vehicles to the 16 space parking lot and entrance at the rear of the building. Two additional parking spaces have been provided at the front entrance. The building has been located outside the 60.8f liner foot WDUZ and the 100-foot FPA and fully complies with the 55-foot height restrictions articulated in the Waterways Regulations for constructing nonwater-dependent use buildings on filled tidelands. The Page 7 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA rys I _ LI LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts ground floor is at elevation 11.5 and all mechanicals will be located at least one foot above the base flood elevation(BFE) 10 in accordance with the Massachusetts State Building Code. 3.2 Landscaping and Waterfront Access The Project Proponent proposes to reduce impervious surfaces by adding new landscaping with native plantings around the building. The planting palette of trees, shrubs,and ground cover consists of select indigenous woody and herbaceous species appropriate to both the coastal edge and the upland condition(Appendix C,Sheet L-1). Landscape beds will be stabilized with stone mulch,as requested by the Fire Department to minimize flammable ground cover. This also will provide a more permanent ground cover in the event of flooding. The sediment forebay and infiltration basin will be planted with a combination of 60%Bioswale Mix and 40%Maritime Grassland Mix available from Pinelands Nursery and Supply(or an equivalent approved vendor or mix). All trees, shrubs, and ground cover east of the existing parking lot will remain in place and protected during construction. The existing fence along the western property boundary will be preserved to provide screening of the new driveway. A 5-foot wide stone dust pathway with a Cape Cod berm will be constructed along the adjacent northern property boundary to provide access through the Project Site to the waterfront. The pathway traverses over the berm between the stormwater forebay and infiltration basin to access the waterfront where an existing sandy pathway extends over the Coastal Bank, onto the Coastal Dune, and along the shoreline. 3.3 Stormwater Management The Project Proponent proposes to provide stormwater management in accordance with DEP's Stormwater Management Guidelines and 310 CMR 10.05 (6) (k) of the Wetlands Protection Act Regulations to ensure protection of coastal resource areas during and after construction. Under existing conditions, stormwater ponds on the property due to a failing catch basin and outfall in the southern portion of the Project site or flows overland unabated and untreated either towards Collins Cove or towards East Collins Street. As a redevelopment project under the DEP Stormwater Management Standards,the project has been designed to mitigate for post-development runoff and maintain existing Drainage patterns to effectively and efficiently convey runoff in the context of the existing urban filled tidelands. Due to the on-site fill material,traditional infiltration is not suitable. Runoff from the Project Site will sheet flow across the parking lot and discharge to the proposed sediment Page 8 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA I I � - � . I " +I r� I � ` � � LECEnvironmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts forebay and vegetative infiltration basin. All discharges are properly treated,will not cause erosion, and represent an improvement over existing conditions as described in greater detail in the Stormwater Management Report prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group,Inc.dated July 22,2019(Appendix D). 3.4 Utilities and Snow Removal The building will be serviced by new water(domestic and fire), sewer,and gas utilities accessed from within East Collins Street. Upgrades to existing electric,telephone, and commination services will be coordinated with the local utility providers. To the extent that the attendant utility and sanitary facilities are below elevation 10,they will be water tight and flood proof. Several areas on-site are available for snow storage, as shown on the Site Layout Plan contained in Appendix C. Excess snow will be removed from the Project Site in accordance with local and state regulations. 4. Alternatives Analysis The Project Proponent has considered four alternatives to the Preferred Project: 1)the No-Build Alternative; 2)Multi-Family Residential; 3)Addiction Rehabilitation and Education Center Concept 1; and 4)Addiction Rehabilitation and Education Center Concept 2. The following table provides a numeric comparison of each alternative to the Preferred Plan, Alternative Structure Pavement Parking Landscaping/ Undeveloped or Gravel Spaces Stormwater Areas No-Build Existing Conditions Scenario 5,240E sf 0.28E ac 38 O.Olf ac O.SSf ac Multi-Family 6,411t sf 0.13E ac 14 0.31E ac 0.38=L ac Residential Addiction Rehabilitation& 4,860E sf 0.22E ac 18 0.11E ac 0.53t ac Education Concept 1 Addiction Rehabilitation& 4,860E sf 0.23E ac 21 0.1 if ac 0.52E ac Education Concept 2 Preferred Project 4,860E sf 0.19E ac 18 0.11±ae 0.55E ac Page 9 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,M RINDGE,NH I I I I ' - �F �s . 1 �f LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts 4.1 No-Build Scenario The Project Site has been vacant and underutilized since closure of the Ward 2 Social Club in roughly 2013 (Existing Conditions Plan,Appendix Q. The Project Proponent has been working towards redeveloping this parcel since 2015. The No-Build Alternative has been in place over the past 5+years. This option has resulted in the decline of the existing building,parking lot, and surrounding landscape areas, does not allow the property owner to realize the site's development potential,and significantly limits the tax benefits to the City of Salem. The no-build alternative is infeasible. 4.2 Multi-Family Residential The Project Proponent originally considered redeveloping the parcel with an 8-unit residential development(Appendix E). The Project Proponent obtained a Variance and Special Permit from the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)on January 4,2017 (Appendix E)that was appealed and is currently under consideration by the Massachusetts Land Court. This alternative contemplated constructing 8 residential units divided into three duplexes and two single-family homes consistent with the dwellings in the surrounding neighborhood. Each building included garage parking with a total of 14 parking spaces. Vehicular access was provided via a curb cut on East Collins Street and a private common pavement/gravel accessway to each unit. The project would fully comply with DEP Stormwater Management requirements and provide public access to the waterfront as required by the Chapter 91 Waterways process. This alternative would reduce pavement surface from approximately 12,200f sf to 5,529f sf. The proposed residential buildings would encompass 6,411f sf of the property,an estimated 1,171f sf increase in building coverage. This proposal would require clearing of 1,700f sf existing naturally vegetated areas for construction of at least one duplex,access to the duplex,and provision of stormwater management. This clearing would occur beyond the existing disturbed edge of parking lot and closer than existing conditions to on-site coastal wetlands and the off-site inland wetland. The Project Proponent did not proceed forward with the multi-family residential alternative beyond receiving the ZBA approval that remains under consideration by the Massachusetts Land Court. 4.3 Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center Concept 1 Concept 1 depicts an Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center encompassing 4,860f sf sited at the front of the Project Site with a one-way entrance from East Collins Street along the northern property boundary and a one-way exit to East Collins Street Page 10 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA 1 � . � . � . i +�1' - ��� � LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts along the southern property boundary. A parking lot with 18 spaces is located at the rear of the Project Site. Concept 1 reduces pavement surface on the Project Site by 2,610f sf. Like all other alternatives,Concept 1 will fully comply with DEP Stormwater Management requirements and provide public access to the waterfront as required by the Chapter 91 Waterways process. Concept 1 would require clearing of 900f sf existing naturally vegetated areas for construction of stormwater management. This clearing would occur beyond the existing disturbed edge of the parking lot and closer than existing conditions to on-site coastal wetlands and the off-site inland wetland. 4.4 Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center Concept 2 Concept 2 depicts an Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center encompassing 4,860f sf sited at the rear of the Project Site with a single two-way entrance off East Collins Street at the western and northern property corner. A parking lot with 15 spaces is located at the front of the Project Site along East Collins Street and a second parking lot with 6 spaces is located north of the building. Concept 2 reduces pavement surface on the Project Site by 2,150f sf. Like all other alternatives, Concept 2 will fully comply with DEP Stormwater Management requirements and provide public access to the waterfront as required by the Chapter 91'Waterways process. Concept 2 would require clearing of 1,200t sf existing naturally vegetated for construction of stormwater management. This clearing would occur beyond the existing disturbed edge of the parking lot and closer than existing conditions to on-site coastal wetlands and the off-site inland wetland. 5. Assessment of Impacts and Mitigation The footprint of the proposed building(4,860f sf footprint)is slightly smaller than the existing building(5,240f sf footprint). Residential style architecture will be used to conform to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The building has been located outside the WDUZ and the FPA,and fully complies with the 55-foot height restrictions articulated in the Waterways Regulations for constructing nonwater-dependent use buildings on filled tidelands. The ground floor is at elevation 11.5 and all mechanicals will be located at least one foot above the base flood elevation(BFE) 10 in accordance with the Massachusetts Building Code. According to preliminary meetings with the City and utility providers, all utilities are adequate. To the extent that the attendant utility and sanitary facilities are below elevation 10,they will be water tight and flood proof. Page 11 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA i i 1 �� � i ii ., ' - �� J I i� LEC Environmental Notification Fo rm New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts The Project Proponent proposes to decrease total impervious cover on the Project Site by 2,740f sf and decrease pavement by 3,766f sf. This reduction in total impervious surface qualifies the project as a redevelopment under DEP Stormwater Management Guidelines and 310 CMR 10.05 (6) (k) of the Wetlands Protection Act Regulations. However,the project fully complies with the Handbook. Proposed drainage conditions will substantially match the existing drainage patterns to ensure no adverse off-site impacts. Peak rates and volume runoff will be reduced due to the decrease in impervious cover. Water quality will be enhanced by pavement removal and installation of the naturally vegetated stormwater infiltration basin and sediment forebay. The new parking lot at the rear of the proposed building will provide dedicated parking for the center and will contribute to the residential neighborhood by removing the existing parking along the street frontage. Since the duration of the residential program is two to four weeks and patients are not permitted to have a vehicle,traffic impacts will be minimal and limited to employees and family members visiting for prescheduled meetings with patients and staff. The landscaping plant palette of trees, shrubs,and ground cover consists of select indigenous woody and herbaceous species appropriate to both the coastal edge and the upland condition. Landscape beds will be stabilized with stone mulch,as requested by the Fire Department to minimize flammable ground cover. This also will provide a more permanent ground cover in the event of flooding. The existing fence along the western property boundary will be preserved to provide screening of the new driveway. A 5-foot wide stone dust pathway with a Cape Cod berm will be constructed along the adjacent northern property boundary to provide access through the Project Site to the waterfront. 6. Regulatory Compliance/General Performance Standards The proposed project will occur within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage(LSCSF) and private filled tidelands. 6.1 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF) 310 CMR 10.04 There are no General Performance Standards in the Act Regulations for LSCSF. The entire Project Site occurs within LSCSF and has been carefully graded and designed to properly drain the Project Site towards the proposed sediment forebay and vegetated infiltration basin and allow storm surges or flood events to recede without any long-term flooding or ponding of water. The Project Site has been redeveloped and designed to Page 12 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 4 �� Y . H LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts assure that the building(slightly smaller than the existing facility and within the same footprint)and associated grading will not deflect,reflect,or redirect flood waters. Lastly, the building has been designed with the ground floor elevation 11.5 and in full compliance with the state building code for constructing buildings with the coastal flood zone. 6.2 Private Filled Tidelands As noted in Section 2.4 above, 11,740E sf of the Project Site occurs within private filled tidelands. All work is located beyond the 60.8E linear foot WDUZ and the 100-foot FPA, as measured landward from MHW. Asa result,the project must comply with portions of 310 CMR 9.31, 9:51, 9.52, and 9.54 as detailed below. 6.2.1 310 CMR 9.31(2) b Nonwater-de endent Use Projects 310 CMR 9.31(2)(b)Nonwater-dependent Use Projects states that the Department shall presume 310 CMR 9.31(2) is met if the project is a nonwater-dependent use project which: 1. complies with the standards for conserving and utilizing the capacity of the project site to accommodate water-dependent use, according to the applicable provisions of 310 and complies with the additional standard for activating Commonwealth tidelands for public use, according to the applicable provisions of 310 CMR 9.53; See below for excerpted applicable sections of 310 CMR 9.51 and 9.53 and text indicating compliance with each section. 2. if located in the coastal zone, complies with the standard governing consistency with the policies of the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Program, according to 310 CMR 9.54; and See Section 6.2.4 below for applicable compliance with the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Program. 3. if consisting entirely of infrastructure facilities, to which 310 CMR 9.31(2)(b)I..Does not apply, complies with the special mitigation and public access standards governing such facilities, according to 310 CMR 9.55. This project does not consist of infrastructure facilities which means a facility that produces, delivers, or otherwise provides electric, gas,water, sewage,transportation, or telecommunication services to the public. Page 13 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA 1 I I 11 ,. �� 1 . I ■ � . LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts 6.2.2 310 CMR 9.51 for Conservation of Capacity for Water-Dependent Use According to 310 CMR 9.51, Standards 2 and 3 are applicable to the Proposed Project. Standards 1,4 and 5 do not apply since they address Facilities of Private Tenancy projects located on Great Ponds or in Designated Port Areas. (2) If the project includes new structures or spaces for nonwater-dependent use, such structures or spaces must be developed in a manner that protects the utility and adaptability of the site for water-dependent purposes by preventing significant incompatibility in design with structures and spaces which reasonably can be expected to serve such purposes, either on or adjacent to the project site.Aspects of built form that may give rise to design incompatibility.... include, but are not limited to: (a) the total surface coverage by buildings and other permanent structures..., (b) the layout and configuration of buildings and other permanent structures..., (c) the scale of buildings and other permanent structures..., and (d) the landscape design of exterior open spaces. See Section 3 above for a detailed description of the building and layout design. The building will not be located within the WDUZ or the 100-foot FPA. (3) The Department shall find that the standard is not met if the project does not comply with the following minimum conditions which, in the absence of a municipal harbor plan which promotes the policy objectives stated herein with comparable or greater effectiveness, are necessary to prevent undue detriments to the capacity of tidelands to accommodate water-dependent use: (a) new pile-supported structures for nonwater-dependent use shall not extend beyond the footprint of existing,previously authorized pile-supported structures... There are no existing such structures on the property,therefore this requirement does not apply to the project. (b) Facilities of Public Accommodation, but not nonwater-dependent Facilities of Private Tenancy, shall be located on any pile-supported structures on flowed tidelands and at the ground level of any filled tidelands within 100 feet of a project shoreline. The building will not be located within 100 feet of the project shoreline. Page 14 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH i I _ . � _ i i I _ . .: �f 1 I] 1 1 LEA Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts (c) new or expanded buildings for nonwater-dependent use, and parking facilities at or above grade for any use, shall not be located within a water-dependent use zone... No buildings or parking are proposed within the WDUZ. (d) at least one square foot of the project site at ground level, exclusive of areas lying seaward of a project shoreline, shall be reserved as open space for every square foot of tideland area within the combined footprint of buildings containing nonwater-dependent use on the project site... The proposed building encompasses 3,296f sf(including eaves or overhangs)of filled tidelands. Open space landward of the project shoreline within filled tidelands encompasses 8,444f sf resulting in a greater than 1:1 ratio of required open space. (e) new or expanded buildings for nonwater-dependent use shall not exceed 55 feet in height if located over the water or within 100 feet landward of the high water mark; at greater landward distances, the height of such buildings shall not exceed 55 feet plus %foot for every additional foot of separation from the high water mark;as provided in 310 CMR 9.34(2)(b)1.... The proposed 34.2 feet high building is not located over the water or within 100 feet of the high water mark. 6.2.3 310 CMR 9.52 for Utilization of Shoreline for Water-dependent Purposes According to 310 CMR 9.52,A nonwater-dependent use project that includes fill or structures on any tidelands shall devote a reasonable portion of such lands to water- dependent use, including public access in the exercise of public rights in such lands. In applying this standard, the Department shall take into account any relevant information concerning the capacity of the project site serve such water-dependent purposes, especially in the vicinity of a water-dependent use zone... Standard 1 is applicable to the Proposed Project and Standards 2 and 3 do not apply since they address projects without a WDUZ or located on Great Ponds. (1) In the event the project site includes a water-dependent use zone, the project shall include at least the following: (a) one or more facilities that generate water-dependent activity of a kind and to a degree that is appropriate for the project site, given the nature of the project, Page 15 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA 4' I II 1 I II I 1 � I F III j LEC Environmental Notification Form New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts conditions of the water body on which it is located, and other relevant circumstances....and (b) a pedestrian access network of a kind and to a degree that is appropriate for the project site and the facility(ies)provided in 310 CMR 9.52(1)(a);at a minimum, such network shall consist of 1. walkways and related facilities along the entire length of the water- dependent use zone;wherever feasible, such walkways shall be adjacent to the project shoreline and, except as otherwise provided in a municipal harbor plan, shall be no less than ten feet in width;and 2. appropriate connecting walkways that allow pedestrians to approach the shoreline walkways from public ways or other public access facilities to which any tidelands on the project site are adjacent. Such pedestrian access network shall be available to the public for use in connection with fishing, fowling, navigation, and any other purposes consistent with the extent of public rights at the project site. No work is proposed within or near the WDUZ. The WDUZ falls within the confines of the Coastal Beach, Coastal Dune,and Salt Marsh, A 5-foot wide stone dust pathway with a Cape Cod berm will be constructed along the adjacent northern property boundary to provide access through the Project Site to the waterfront. The pathway traverses over the berm between the stormwater forebay and infiltration basin to access the waterfront where an existing sandy pathway extends over the Coastal Bank and onto the Coastal Dune. Appropriate signage at East Collins Street noting the public access will be provided to direct the public to the waterfront. 6.2.4 310 CMR 9.54 for Consistency with Coastal Zone Manaclement Policies According to 310 CMR 9.54,nonwater-dependent use projects located in the coastal zone shall be consistent with all policies of the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Program,pursuant to 301 CMR 20.05(3). To the extent applicable,the project as proposed complies with the CZM Policies as articulated throughout this ENF Report. Page 16 of 16 PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA I I I� I� I _ �� � . II �a � :: LEI_:� Literature Cited City of Salem Wetlands Protection and Conservation Ordinance. Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L.c. 131,§. 40),www.state.ma.us/det� Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations(310 CMR 10.00), www.state.ma.us/dep Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Atlas of Estimated Habitat of State-listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife. Natural Heritage&Endangered Species Program,Massachusetts Division of Fisheries&Wildlife, 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough,MA 01581,www.state.ma.us/dfwele/dfw National Flood Insurance Program,Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for Essex County,Massachusetts Panel 417 of 600(Community Panel Number 25009C 0417 G)dated,July 16,2014. PLYMOUTH,MA WAKEFIELD,MA WORCESTER,MA RINDGE,NH 1 I - I I - �I �i . �L i Appendix A ` Locus Maps IFigure 1: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Figure 2: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Figure 3: MassGIS Orthophoto and NHESP Map Yi � ■ �I � � i! , i �J i � ��� �` s4`,� �� �. 'I��, , ;.I�� ,� ICI ; ,1 _ �� .1 �� r OF i yN i ~ ■ iti Ilk % ` ii ■ + ■ � ! illf NJ � 5 +i Ilka ■4 IF }* ! ! i • i * � 4 1 56 � i ■. * #4 a % Af ■ 46 •10 Ibis ■ % 44 Rr � 10 '- 4 + ' 4. * i L. y t ■ + i ■ *�/i*i f * a 10 — ■ ■ 'f 1P i ! i i i s f i 0 .0 or IF s f■ ■ i 14 ■ ■ a It * 4 * ■ ! i It Is' 11 i # ■ y a i idol ■ i ■ ! i 6, e It IL �,� *�■ i � � * � i is i � i t � � i i ! i # f A ■* � fi � � f Office of Geographic and Environmental Information 11P ILt 10 i (MassGIS),Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 1:25,000 USGS Topographic Images-April 2001 ■ * # ; .1. f Ali t ! �. ■ r LEC Figure 1: USGS Topographic Map N 1-3 East Collins Street Environmental Consultants,Inc. Salem, MA Wakefield,MA 781.245.2500 0 150 300 Feet August 30, 2019 www.lecenvironmental.com 1 I I I < < 4, . I I Y ��� �� 1 :+ Figure 2: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map a ■ u W ■ a Warty O cc0 cqr �' E=�0E G CL > uu B >> m@Wr- W- I ■m Z N g Cli 15° c0 --Cc Q °do76 W v - Uj z 33 Jg ao �� E �S3za o r. E ;v�CD na '°� o a=1 $gym ° yyI� 2 $ n�Z� � �•� cE N w� �a W s of rtim Q IJi W Q a y 3 z 18 rn ���� V�L�°c $ u� O e pi ® a c E 1 c .. T i � Y8 3� I `o140 • n . _ Q • � W ■ J W } r ��„ � ■ ■■ "./•■ . •■Ilan .a W J •. ....... � •■tr s •a a�e a■• •r • y ■*r r sWr •••■ •w. Cr is r ■..+...r.■ r. F+' �■�. • a■ +r_■fa•a LU IV ■ 2 r v 2i .a rrii .i •' LU o -�f►r III. R/�i w AVI--v 40 _ a - .�Syr •� ` L�Wig ►r�y qr • •Lr}y� w.. >x LU Ux a: •j1� •.:.■ v LU a:CC 7 J '•t■..■■...■ VS tl715 Z 'i•Z a. i i I ! � 1 . �!� � i o c `o c m m co P - ° W � Q $ rs _= c J 8t o IQ m m r o r r $ W Z E mm¢ 3 z m n oo P E M � E ° o -J r c o m c m� 8 « c p 06 }ij a r8 zo moo ,, O c �c a ov- o c ty L m- 8V Wp ZIW- v � o a o � o � � Q�Q� Z �3�• � E of n rt Z' � m m c m= m 7t �a "WAN y3 e ¢ A o `�° J c c o W m E � 8 rnz 0 �� aN a c 8 c " o 00 o o E c8 9 � x a W O ; c o pa, amo` 1d '�3 c o f m aQ �O Qs Llf m a o sy0� m B m o o c � N $ � r W? ydS H o c r $ v a.Of ti a _ m a p q o P m e m � L c 3 p c y my o `o t$ cr. E►s E E^ s 5 Up a. m m Jq LL LL �tI w E a t$ Cl v M t� (� o c n tilb J > m S Q = • �. o �a N W m.4°aa 8 $ I Z Q � � � °• s E co V-71 co 01.8 VA / I • • 1 O a ttLo� r ' : .' .�. v m 1 iV $ X +� co �$ o 8 m o VA L f• c � � a m m c o m c �IE a o is is o g �_ tt 0 '$ a� W S� o - —_ « �+ c �c E ` �O o o Er . I � a m p 0 c E o1C c# - �� a _ c ggFXo m fA 8 ��¢m $ o `� E �iia`o a$ cc`�d � 1 Zz HEm � a3cs � 'c Ly eaL sQ E W QYB E � � ffir9fS cM a � 3 o io4 v rR �p v- + ` a Vim c S1 Ema' € 6a � Z v W m m 8 m c 4 a 0 a 4 E m m E W 'S-a m r E EtS i N m r J = �'o� c c —c° v o° Qa r Z 8 ma mZ ~ cam$ o 117 S� � 8m: � � � � � oor� 8c n .rm. cgm Q m e 0 oa $ _0 c��gpaf5 ¢ m m�c may ¢ mho ao ° c c Q a84 Qm E � Qs� cQ� ¢ 5�� E st � c 3 c GCm 9 3 0 co c z e Sm ,Mo 13 i—* o mo m « mm cS `om� v c c ma 8� a.c In �` g '' 3 E Y '�' 3E�S o m c4 c < C C Q a 9 °o a�i •i.• !C x O '•' m� �� � W OZ 2p 2 Z W W W � 8L • � z W p W ii IL- mrM m N N N mg •:•• N O i I � � . I_ i � _ �_1 a 1 i ■ _ Legend . NHESP Certified Vernal Pool NHESP Potential Vernal Pool L NHESP Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife(2017) NHESP Priority Habitats 5 of Rare Species(2017) ems. DEP Historic High Water Line Figure 3: MassGIS Orthophoto & NHESP Map N 1-3 East Collins Street Environmental Consuftants,Inc. Salem, MA Wakefield,MA 781.245.2500 0 100 200 Feet August 30, 2019 1 1 1 www.lecenvironmental.com I Ia I �I Appendix B Order of Conditions Issued by the Salem Conservation Commission Dated August 14,2019 Request for Superseding Order of Conditions Filed by Scott Truhart and Citizen Group Received by MADEP NERO on August 22,2019 i i F:a i lih 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: L)I,— Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEPFile# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransacson# Salem A. General Information City/Tom _ Please note: Salem this form has 1.From: —_ been modified Conservation—Commission - with added 2. This issuance is for space to a.®Order of Conditions b. Amended Order of Conditions accommodate (check one): ❑ the Registry of Deeds 3.To: Applicant: Requirements New View Addiction Rehabilitation and Important: Education Center, Inc. _ _ When filling a.First Name - b.Last Name out forms on _ the o Organization _._-- computer, 11 6a Street use only the —.—Y.�. tab key to d.Mailing Address - - ----— - — move your Beverly- - MA cursor-do � e.Citylrown - --- ._. 01916 not use the f.State g.Zip Code return key. 4. property Owner(if different from applicant): Mark .._�_._ _. Clifford a.First Name ---_ _ b.Last Name - rerm -.Organization 176 Lake Street d.Mailing Address "`--- —- Middleton Y _MA_ 01949 e.City/Town __--T. - f.State_ - — g.Zip Code~ 5. Project Location: 1-3 East Collins Street Salem_ _ a.Street Address _ - ...---- �-• -...-_ b.CitylTown 36 277 _- c.Assessors Map/Plat Number - d.Parcel/Lott Number wpeform5Aw- rev.6tlW015 Page 1 of 12 4 LLIMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 - WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransaotlon# Salem City/Town Latitude and Longitude, if known: 42d31 m56.17s 70d53m8.70s d.Latitude e.Longitude A. General Information (cunt.) 6. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for-(attach additional information if more than one parcel): _Southern Essex a.Co� r -- - — b.Certificate Number(d registered land) 37343 494 c.Book - d.Page 7/22/19 _ 8/8/19 7. Dates: — 8/14/19 a.Date Notice of Intent Filed b.Date Public Hearing Closed c.Date of Issuance s. Final Approved Plans and Other Documents(attach additional plan or document references as needed): Site Redevelopment Plans for New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center, Inc. a.Plan Title -` — The Morin-Cameron Grou Inc. _ Michael C. Laham _ b.Prepared By c.Signed and Stamped by 7/22/19 d.Final Revision Date e.Scalery f.Additional Plan or Document Title B. Findings "--— --- -- g.Date ---...__. ---- - i. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing,this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act(the Act). Check all that apply: a. ❑ Public Water Supply b. ® Land Containing Shellfish c' ® Prevention of Pollution d. ❑ Private Water Supply e. ® Fisheries f ® Protection of Wildlife Habitat g. ® Groundwater Supply h. ® Storm Damage Prevention I. ® Flood Control 2. This Commission hereby finds the project,as proposed,is:(check one of the following boxes) Approved subject to: a. ® the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations.This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above,the following General Conditions,and any other special conditions attached to this Order.To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications,or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, these conditions shall control. wpaf0rm5.d0c• rev.6/16/2016 Page 2 of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions lvlassDEP File# = Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransaction# Salem CWTo" B. Findings (cont.) - Denied because: b. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect the interests of the Act, and a final Order of Conditions is issued.A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site,the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified In the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). 3. ❑ Buffer Zone Impacts:Shortest distance between limit of project disturbance and the wetland resource area specified in 310 CMR 10.02(1)(a) a.Iinearfeet Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement a. ❑ Bank ar _. _ _ ___ a.linear feet b.line feet c.linear feet d.line_ar feet 5. ❑ Bordering _ Vegetated Wetland a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 6. ❑ Land Under __ _ !I FORMTEXT Waterbodies and a.square fe_et__ b.square feet C.square feet d.square feet Waterways e.c/y dredged f.ct dredged 7. El Bordering Land _ Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage 8 e.cubic feet f.cubic feet g.cubic feet h.cubic feet ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage c.cubic feet d.cubic feet e.cubic feet f.cubic feet s. ❑ Riverfront Area a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq ft within 100 ft -_ _. c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet wpaform5.doc•rev.6/1612015 Page 3of12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# LL1— Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eD-EPTransaction# Salem Sq ft between 100- City/Town _ 200 It Q.square feet h.square feet �i i,square feet J.square feet B. Findings (cont.) Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted 10. El Designated Port Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below 11, ❑ Land Under the _ Ocean a.square feet b.square feet c.cty dredged d,rry dredged 12. ❑ Barrier Beaches Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below 13. ❑ Coastal Beaches cu yd cu yd a.square feet b.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment 14. ❑ Coastal Dunes — cu yd cu yd a.square feet b.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment 15. ❑ Coastal Banks a.linear feet b.linear feet 16• ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores a.square feet b.square feet 17. ❑ Salt Marshes 18. El Land Under Salt a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet _ Ponds a.square feet b,square feet c.cty dredged d.cJy dredged 19. ❑ Land Containing _ Shellfish a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 20. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, Inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean,and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways,above a.c/y dredged b.cry dredged 21. ® Land Subject to 20,500 20,500 Coastal Storm a.square feet E.square feet Flowage 22. ❑ Riverfront Area ___-- a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq ft within 100 ft c.square feet d.square feet e. fe f.square et square feet wpaform5.doc• rev.6116=15 Page 4 of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: i LI Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 iDEP Transactlon# Salem Citylrown Sq ft between 100- 200 ft _ _ _ g,square feet h.squa_re feet_ I.square feet j.square feet B. Findings (cont.) project is for 23. ElRestoration/Enhancement*: the purpose of restoring or a.square feet of BVW enhancing a b.square feet of salt marsh wetland resource area 24. ElStream Crossing(s): in addition to the square footage that a.number of new stream crossings b.number of replacement stream crossings has been C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act entered In Section B.5.c (BVW)o(Salt The following conditions are only applicable to Approved projects. Marsh)above, 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other please enter the additional regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. amount here. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal,state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. The work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act;or b. The time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years,from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. c. If the work is for a Test Project, this Order of Conditions shall be valid for no more than one year. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. An Order of Conditions for a Test Project may be extended for one additional year only upon written application by the applicant,subject to the provisions of 310 CMR 10.05(11)(f). 6. If this Order constitutes an Amended Order of Conditions,this Amended Order of Conditions does not extend the issuance date of the original Final Order of Conditions and the Order will expire on 8/14122 unless extended in writing by the Department. 7. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill.Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster,wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe,tires,ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. wpeform&doc• rev.611612015 Page 5 Of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eoEPTransaction# Salem Cityrrown C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 8. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 9. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land,the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land,the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done.The recording information shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order,which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 10. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection"[or,"MassDEP"] "File Number 64-681 " 11. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order,the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before MassDEP. 12.' Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant'shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance(WPA Form 8A)to the Conservation Commission. 13. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 14. Any change to the plans identified in Condition#13 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 15. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. 16. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. wpeform5.doc• rev,6/16/2015 Page 6 of 12 4 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 y WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransacUon# Salem cityrrown__..�.___ _...-- C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(cont.) 17. Prior to the start of work,and If the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland,the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 18. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means.At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction,the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission,which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. 19. The work associated with this Order(the"Project") (1)® is subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards (2)❑ is NOT subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards If the work is subject to the Stormwater Standards,then the project is subject to the following conditions: a) All work,including site preparation, land disturbance,construction and redevelopment, shall be implemented in accordance with the construction period pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation control plan and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit as required by Stormwater Condition 8. Construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution control measures and best management practices (BMPs)shall remain in place until the site is fully stabilized. b) No stormwater runoff maybe discharged to the post-construction stormwater BMPs unless and until a Registered Professional Engineer provides a Certification that: L all construction period BMPs have been removed or will be removed by a date certain specified in the Certification. For any construction period BMPs intended to be converted to post construction operation for stormwater attenuation, recharge,and/or treatment,the conversion is allowed by the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook BMP specifications and that the BMP has been properly cleaned or prepared for post construction operation, including removal of all construction period sediment trapped in inlet and outlet control structures; #. as-built final construction BMP plans are included,signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, certifying the site is fully stabilized; i//.any illicit discharges to the stormwater management system have been removed, as per the requirements of Stormwater Standard 10; wp0f0rm5.dcc rev.6/16/2015 Page 7 of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 �LIN WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEPFile# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem cityrT C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) iv. all post-construction stormwater BMPs are installed in accordance with the plans (including all planting plans)approved by the issuing authority, and have been inspected to ensure that they are not damaged and that they are in proper working condition; v. any vegetation associated with post-construction BMPs is suitably established to withstand erosion. c) The landowner is responsible for BMP maintenance until the issuing authority is notified that another parry has legally assumed responsibility for BMP maintenance. Prior to requesting a Certificate of Compliance, or Partial Certificate of Compliance, the responsible party(defined in General Condition 18(e))shall execute and submit to the issuing authority an Operation and Maintenance Compliance Statement("O&M Statement)for the Stormwater BMPs identifying the party responsible for implementing the stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan ("O&M Plan")and certifying the following: i.)the O&M Plan is complete and will be implemented upon receipt of the Certificate of Compliance, and ii.)the future responsible parties shall be notified in writing of their ongoing legal responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management BMPs and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. d) Post-construction pollution prevention and source control shall be implemented in accordance with the long-term pollution prevention plan section of the approved Stormwater Report and, if applicable,the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector General Permit. e) Unless and until another party accepts responsibility,the landowner,or owner of any drainage easement,assumes responsibility for maintaining each BMP. To overcome this presumption,the landowner of the property must submit to the issuing authority a legally binding agreement of record, acceptable to the issuing authority, evidencing that another entity has accepted responsibility for maintaining the BMP, and that the proposed responsible party shall be treated as a permittee for purposes of implementing the requirements of Conditions 18(f)through 18(k)with respect to that BMP. Any failure of the proposed responsible party to implement the requirements of Conditions 18(f)through 18(k)with respect to that BMP shall be a violation of the Order of Conditions or Certificate of Compliance. In the case of stormwater BMPs that are serving more than one lot,the legally binding agreement shall also identify the lots that will be serviced by the stormwater BMPs. A plan and easement deed that grants the responsible party access to perform the required operation and maintenance must be submitted along with the legally binding agreement. f) The responsible party shall operate and maintain all stormwater BMPs in accordance With the design plans, the O&M Plan, and the requirements of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. wpaform5.doc-rev.611612Di5 Page 8 of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP He# -- Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 0EP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown _ C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(coat.) g) .The responsible party shall: 1. Maintain an operation and maintenance log for the last three(3)consecutive calendar years of inspections, repairs, maintenance and/or replacement of the stormwater management system or any part thereof,and disposal(for disposal the log shall indicate the type of material and the disposal location); 2. Make the maintenance log available to MassDEP and the Conservation Commission("Commission') upon request;and 3. Allow members and agents of the MassDEP and the Commission to enter and Inspect the site to evaluate and ensure that the responsible party is in compliance with the requirements for each BMP established in the O&M Plan approved by the issuing authority. h) All sediment or other contaminants removed from stormwater BMPs shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal, state,and local laws and regulations. i) Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system as defined in 310 CMR 10.04 are prohibited. j) The stormwater management system approved in the Order of Conditions shall not be changed without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. k) Areas designated as qualifying pervious areas for the purpose of the Low Impact Site Design Credit(as defined in the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook,Volume 3, Chapter 1, Low Impact Development Site Design Credits)shall not be altered without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. 1) Access for maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of BMPs shall not be withheld. Any fencing constructed around stormwater BMPs shall include access gates and shall be at least six inches above grade to allow for wildlife passage. Special Conditions(if you need more space for additional conditions, please attach a text document): See attached 20. For Test Projects subject to 310 CMR 10.05(11). the applicant shall also implement the monitoring plan and the restoration plan submitted with the Notice of Intent. If the conservation commission or Department determines that the Test Project threatens the public health,safety or the environment,the applicant shall implement the removal plan submitted with the Notice of Intent or modify the project as directed by the conservation commission or the Department. vrpaf6rm6.doc• rev.&1612015 Page 9 of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEPFile#_V Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransactlon# Salem cityrrown —_ D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance 1. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? ® Yes ❑ No 2. The _Salem hereby finds(check one that applies): Conservation commission a_ a. ❑that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw, specifically: 1.Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2.Citation Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. b. ®that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: Wetlands Protection and Con_ser_vation _ _ c.50 _ 1.Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw . ,.� — 2.Citation 3. The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the conditions shall control. _ The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows(if you need more space for additional conditions,attach a text document): Attached conditions are issued under the Wetlands Protection Act and are sufficient for oompliance.with the local ordinance wpafarm5.doo•rev.6/16/2015 Page 10 of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Ll Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Trans-action# Salem City/Town E. Signatures This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special condition pursuant to General Conditions#4,from the date of issuance. 1.Date of Issuance Please indicate the number of members who will sign this form. it This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. Z.Number of Signers The Order must be mailed by certified mail(return receipt requested)or he elivered to the applicant.A copy also must be mailed or hand delivered at the same time to the ap ate Departure Environmental Protection Regional Office,if not filing electronics I e p party or,If diffe from applicant. Signatures: —� --- —. ❑ by hand delivery on by certified mail, return receipt requested,on Date -- Date F. Appeals The applicant,the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order,any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order,or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions.The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7)within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order.A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. Any appellants seeking to appeal the Department's Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40), and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations(310 CMR 10.00).To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw,and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations,the Department has no appellate Jurisdiction. wpaform5.doc rev.611612015 Page 11 of 12 4 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransaction# Salem City/Town wetlands regulations(310 CMR 10.00).To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw,and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the G. Recording Information Prior to commencement of work,this Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land,the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions.The recording information on this page shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. Conservation Commission - Detach on dotted line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. •-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: Conservation Commission -- Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: Project Location - _ MassDEP File Number ^— �Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: Book Page for: Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: Document Number wpaform5,doo rev.6/16/2015 Page 12 of 12 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands 64-681 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem City/Town Signature of Applicant vvpaform5.doc• rev.6IM2015 Page 13aF12 4 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number: Request for Departmental Action Fee _. Transmittal Form Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. Request Information 1. Location of Project a.Street Address b.City/Town,Zip c.Check number d.Fee amount Important: 2 Person or making request if appropriate, name the citizen rou 's representative): When filling � ' g ( g p out forms on _ the computer, (Jame use only the tab key to Mailing Address move your cursor-do Zit ylTown State — Zip Cade not use the return key. phone Number Fax Number(if applicable) c 3. Applicant(as shown on Determination of Applicability(Form 2), Order of Resource Area Delineation (Form 413), Order of Conditions(Form 5), Restoration Order of Conditions(Form 5A),or Notice of Non-Significance(Form 6)): Mailing Address Cityrrown - - - ---- '--- State Zip Code Phone Number— Fax Number(if applicable) 4. DEP File Number: B. Instructions 1. When the Departmental action request is for(check one): ❑ Superseding Order of Conditions—Fee: $120.00(single family house projects)or$245(all other projects) ❑ Superseding Determination of Applicability—Fee:$120 ❑ Superseding Order of Resource Area Delineation—Fee:$120 wpaform5.doc• rev.4122015 Page 1 of 2 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number. Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form Provided by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Instructions (Cont.) Send this form and check or money order,payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,to: Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 2. On a separate sheet attached to this form, state clearly and concisely the objections to the Determination or Order which is being appealed. To the extent that the Determination or Order is based on a municipal bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. 3. Send a copy of this form and a copy of the check or money order with the Request for a Superseding Determination or Order by certified mail or hand delivery to the appropriate DEP Regional Office(see htti-://www.mass.r�ov/eeala-;encieslmassder)/abouVeontacts/ 4. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. %peform5.doc-rev.4/2212015 Page 2 of 2 Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-681 Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT TO ORDER OF CONDITIONS SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEP FILE#64-681 1-3 East Collins Street City of Salem,Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife and Certified Vernal Pools Map(8/14/19, online) from Natural Heritage&Endangered Species Program(NHESP)of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife,it has been determined that this project does not occur near any habitat of state-listed rare wildlife species nor contain any vernal pools. This Order permits the razing of existing structure, building a new structure, configuring parking and walkways, removing pavement, installing utilities, installing stormwater facilities, and minor grading per 7/22/19 Notice of Intent,approved plans,and the following conditions. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety(including all 5 pages of Special Conditions) at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance. A copy of the recording information must be submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission before any work approved in this Order commences. 2. Approval of this application does not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than M.G.L Chapter 131, Section 40,Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance, Salem Code Chapter 50. 3. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plan(s). No alteration of wetland resource areas or associated buffer zones,other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. 4. Prior to any work commencing on site,a DEP Sign showing DEP File#64-681 must be installed at the entrance to the site and seen from the public way,but not placed on a living tree. 5. No work approved in this Order may commence until the ten(10)day appeal period has lapsed from the date of the issuance of this Order. 6. With respect to this Order,the Commission designates the Conservation Agent as its agent with powers to act on its behalf in administering and enforcing this Order. 7. The Commission or its Agent,officers,or employees shall have the right to enter and inspect the property at any time for compliance with the conditions of this Order,the Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Attachment to Order of Conditions# 64-681 Page 2 of 5 Section 40,the Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00,and shall have the right to require any data or documentation that it deems necessary for that evaluation. 8. The term"Applicant"as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner,any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of intent,supporting documents and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in writing within 30 days of all transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal, state and local permits and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: (1) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(P.L.92-500,86 stat. 816),U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec.27(5)of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified in 314 CMR 9.00. (3) Design Requirements for Construction in Floodplains under the State Building Code(780 CMR 744.). 10. If there are conflicting conditions within this Order,the stricter condition(s)shall rule. 11. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 12. The Commission or its Agent shall have the discretion to modify the erosion/siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 13. The Commission reserves the right to impose additional conditions on portions of this project or this site to mitigate any actual or potential impacts resulting from the work herein permitted. 14. The work shall conform to the following attached plans and special conditions: Final Approved Plans Site Redevelopment Plans for New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center, Inc (Yule) - 7/22/19 (Dated) --- - -- -- Michael C.Laham (Signed and Stamped by) City of Salem_ Conservation Commission _ (On file with) 15. Any proposed changes in the approved plan(s)or any deviation in construction from the approved plan(s)shall require the applicant to file a Notice of Pro'ect Change with the Commission. The Notice shall be accompanied by a written inquiry prior to their implementation in the field,as to whether the change(s)is substantial enough to require filing a new Notice of Intent or a request to correct or amend this Order of Conditions. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection. ;^ .t Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-681 Page 3 of 5 16. In conjunction with the sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued,the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a statement signed by the buyer that he/she is aware of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. 17. [Reserved]. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 18. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site other than activities listed above,there must be a Pre-Construction Meeting on site between the project supervisor,the contractor responsible for the work,and the Conservation Agent and/or a member of the Conservation Commission to ensure that the requirements of the Order of Conditions are understood. The staked erosion control line shall be adjusted,if necessary,during the pre-construction meeting. Please contact the Conservation Agent at (978)619-5685 at least forty-eight(48)hours prior to construction to arrange for the Pre- Construction Meeting. 19. Prior to the pre-construction meeting and commencement of any activity on this site,sedimentation and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Commission and/or its Agent shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 20. No clearing of vegetation,including trees,or disturbance of soil shall occur prior to the pre-construction meeting. Minimal disturbance of shrubs and herbaceous plants shall be allowed prior to the pre- construction meeting if absolutely necessary in order to place erosion control stakes where required. 21. There shall be adequate additional erosion and sediment controls stored onsite for emergency purposes. EROSION CONTROL 22. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phase of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in any wetland resource area and/or buffer zones. The erosion control measures shown on the approval plan(s)and provisions in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project;the Commission or its Agent may require additional measures. 23. All debris,fill and excavated material shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource areas. 24. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each stonn event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 25. The area of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construction day. 26. Any de-watering of trenches or other excavation required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wetland resource areas. All discharge from de-watering activities shall be filtered through straw bale sediment traps,silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. 27. Within thirty(30)days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project,all disturbed areas in the completed portion of the site shall be permanently stabilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover,using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed areas. Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-681 Page 4 of 5 28. If soils are to be disturbed for longer than two(2)months,a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth,exposed surface shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures,firmly anchored,to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION 29. A copy of this Order of Conditions and the plan(s)approved in this Order shall be available on site at all times when work is in progress. 30. No alteration or activity shall occur beyond the limit of work as defined by the siltation barriers shown on the approved plan(s). 31. All waste products,grubbed stumps,slash;construction materials,etc.shall be deposited at least at least 50 feet from the Top of Coastal Bank. 32. Cement trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource,within 50 feet of the Top of Coastal Bank, nor into any drainage system. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wetland resource area shall be immediately removed. 33. All exposed sub-soils shall be covered by a minimum of three(3)inches of quality screened loam topsoil prior to seeding and final stabilization. 34. Immediately following drainage structure installation all inlets shall be protected by silt fence,strawbale barriers and/or silt bags to filter silt from stormwater before it enters the drainage system. 35. There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource areas. 36. All equipment shall be inspected regularly for leaks. Any leaking hydraulic lines,cylinders or any other components shall be fixed immediately. 37. During construction,all drainage structures shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 38. The applicant is herby riotified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement actions by the Conservation Commission including,but not limited to,civil administrative penalties under M.G.L Chapter 21A,section 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION 39. Upon completion of construction and final soil stabilization,the applicant shall submit the following to the Conservation Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance(COC): (1) A Completed Request for a Certificate of Compliance form(WPA Form 8A or other form if required by the Conservation Commission at the time of request). (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineer certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions. (3) An"As-Built"plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor showing post-construction conditions within all areas under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. This plan shall include at a minimum: (a) All wetland resource area boundaries with associated buffer zones and regulatory setback areas taken from the plan(s)approved in this Order of Conditions; 4*7 Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-681 Page 5 of 5 (b) Locations and elevations of all stormwater management conveyances,structures and best management designs,including foundation drains,constructed under this Order within any wetland resource area or buffer zone; (c) Distances from any structures constructed under this Order to wetland resource areas- "structures"include,but are not limited to,all buildings,septic system components,wells, utility lines,fences,retaining walls,and roads/driveways; (d) A line delineating the limit of work-"work"includes any filling,excavating and/or disturbance of soils or vegetation approved under this Order; 40. When issued,the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy of the recording submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. 41. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions,the report must specify how the work differs; at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission,may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of Compliance as described above. 42. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and properly functioning until all exposed soils have been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Conservation Commission and/or its Agent has authorized their removal. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 43. Walkway on the northern side of the property(bordering National Grid property)should be constructed 6 inches higher than the existing pavement to provide additional flood protection from stormwater flooding. 44. Width of the walkway described above should be increased to 5' to comply with Chapter 91 requirements. 45. No snow shall be stored in the infiltration pond. i i i i i i i i i i i i i i RECEIVED AUG 2 2 2019 Mass DEP NERO Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File"" ` Request for Departmental Action Fee �'� • �� Transmittal Form ProvkW by DEP Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, �40 A. Request Information 1.Location of Project 1-5 rats i—a m a.street.AAdddreew b.City/Town,Zip eib Important: rou 2. Person or party making request(d appropriate,name the citizen g p's )' When filling ofeSc of `Trvl�e putr. i�-�-- .i• #r-r��n s i � use only the 4 EK5- - tab key to Mailing Address move yourekLwwn lrlr?A a q?o cursor-do cftyrrcmn State - Zip code not use the 6r-Jrl� 41�yr return key. �mar Fax Nu rnber(if applicable) 3. Applicant(as shown on Determinatign of Applicability(Form 2),Order of Resource Area Delineation (Form 413),Order of Condtions(Form 5), Restoration Order of Conditions(Form 5A),or Notice of Non-Significance(Form 6)): Ismail PtL2ra'1 i a ,k wsc,'t,)O: ► 01 Name MOM gAddren er — �r Z-Y�- A 9t5' Ci yrrown state Zip Code Phone Number Fax Nuanber(if applicable) 4. DEP File Number. (�L'( — to B. Instructions 1. When the Departmental action request is for(check one): A-Superseding Order of Conditions-Fee:$120.00(single family house projects)or$245(all other projects) ❑ Superseding Determination of Applicability-Fee:$120 ❑ Superseding Order of Resource Area Delineation-Fee:$120 rgmtomS.anc•mv.42Y 15 paw 1 ar2 August 20,2019 a 1 1Ci ceeA M.54a.s-r try Deputy Regional Director for the Bureau of Water Resources Wetland Program Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 205B Lowell Street Wilmington MA 01887 Subject: Ten-Citizen Appeal of the Salem Conservation Commission Order of Conditions dated August 14,2019,and request for a Superseding Order of Conditions for Applicant New View Addiction Rehabilitation and Education Center,Inc.of 11 Bay Street,Beverly MA 01915(MassDEP File#64-681) Dear W Freefey: Vi ee d The purpose of this letter is to appeal the Salem Conservation Commission's decision to grant an Order of Conditions to Applicant,New View Addiction Rehabilitation and Education Center, Inc.,to construct a 3-story building that has been described as a 3-story"hospital"type building on the Property at 1-3 East Collins Street,Salem MA 01970,which contains several identified wetland resources. Background and Reasons for Appeal This property was formerly a part of the New England Power Company(Massachusetts Electric/Boston Gas/Keyspan). Sometime in the early 1940's,the property now known as 1-3 East Collins Street,Salem _ MA was gifted to the Ward 2 to form a social club(Ward 2 Social Club). For over 60 years this property was used by Ward 2 residents as a social club,as well as,a meeting place for local youth sports leagues, political events,weddings and other social events. It was also a members only bar room. In 2013,the club members voted to close and sell the property. After some unsuccessful sale attempts the property was put into foreclosure by Salem Five Bank. In the spring of 2015,there was a scheduled public auction of the property. Michael Meyer of 11 Bay Street, Beverly MA claimed to have purchased the note from the bank directly. On May 21,2015,this property was logged in the Essex County Registry of Deeds listing Michael Meyer as the owner of the property. Mr. Meyer applied to the City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals for a Special Permit to build condominiums on the site in September 2015. At this time, Mr.Meyer threatened the community and the City of Salem; he said that if he did not get approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals on the Special Permit application for a housing redevelopment he would use the property for housing mentally disabled persons,and then a drug rehab center. Therefore,allowing him to side-step all zoning by using the Dover Amendment protection. The property then changed ownership in February 2019,the new owner of record is Mark Clifford. There is currently an active case in the Land Court appealing the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals decision to grant permission for 5 buildings(3 townhouses and 2 single family homes),equaling 8 units of housing. What is now currently being proposed to the Salem Conservation Commission is something completely different. This property is best described as a 41,000+square foot lot consisting of partial wetland,coastal dunes (the last remaining dune in the City of Salem),coastal bank,salt marsh and coastal beach. The lot's grade appears to slope towards the east(water side)of the rear of the property. There is currently a block-style building that is mostly below grade,bunker type construction,with a flat rubber roof. The property lies completely in Flood Hazard District AE (Elevation 10.0),and is mostly in the Chapter 91 Jurisdiction. There has been no Chapter 91 License applied for, nor approved for this property. There is presumed pollution on the property,and is being monitored by at least 2 active monitoring wells located approximately 1 foot from the property line. There is also an LNG high pressure line easement that cuts directly through the property.This site should be sampled for pollutants and. contaminants to ensure they are mitigated prior to any redevelopment. The Salem Conservation Commission failed to perform a peer review,or conduct due diligence to verify information provided by the firm hired by the applicant. In less than 60 minutes the Board approved the application with minimal and low significance orders/conditions. This site suffers from storm water issues,as well as,ocean flooding. It is commonly flooded by as much as a measured 3.5 feet of standing water. The proposed plan does not address any valid method to control this. Please see attached photos of the flooding that the property experiences. The proposal discusses the removal of 2,749 square feet of pavement to increase storm water mitigation. The area.of this removal will be of very little value based on the proposed location of the removal of pavement near the property line at East Collins Street;this area sees little to no run-off and minimal value will be appreciated. Additionally,the applicant's plan calls for the installation of a sediment forebay and infiltration basin,the location of this basin lies within the low point of the property that frequently sees 2-3 feet of ocean flood water and rainstorm water. This system might work outside of the flood zone, however,in this case where active uncontrolled ocean flooding and pooling of rain water,the system will fail creating further burden to the identified resources,and the direct abutter on the south side of the property. In fact, it could concentrate any contaminates that likely exist in the property soils,which will escape during flooding events(whether the ocean or rain pooling). The number of parked cars and trucks suggested will be parked very close to the resources,it is very likely that any leaking fluids(ie;gasoline,oil,grease and/or antifreeze)will find their way into the wetlands. We would like to understand from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection what current Polychlorinated Biphenyl(PCB),or other toxic chemicals associated with the property at large (being it was formerly part of the New England Power Company) is polluted,and to what extent. For the past nearly 20 years Clean Harbors has come twice a summer to clean the debris from the sandy beach. This debris is remnants derived from the NE Power Company many decades ago. Also, please see attached Environmental Notification Form/EOEA No. 13541. Finally,what good is any storm water management plan when the elevation of the parking lot is at the 10 foot level mark; and the area is known to see 3-4 feet of flooding? Abutters and residents of the neighborhood have serious concerns about the new building foundation and diversion of groundwater flow. The direct abutter experiences flooding that is directly flowing from the 1-3 East Collins Street property onto their property(5 East Collins Street). The citizens of the East Collins Street neighborhood view the recent Salem Conservation Commission decision as a major step backwards in restoring the community from an environmental,public health and safety;and quality of life perspective. We understand that the Massachusetts Wetlands Program cannot prevent any given project from being built,however,we have seen that the intervention and hard work performed by your Programs Field Analyst have led to major improvements in projects located in our near wetlands in the City of Salem. In closing,we hope that you will consider our 10-Citizen Appeal so as to ensure that this proposal respects the identified resources on the property. We thank you in advance for your time and attention to our concerns. Sincerely,and on behalf of the 10 citizens of Salem that are listed, Scott Truhart 4 East Collins Street Salem MA tackin about ahoo.com fen-Citizen Apepeal of the Salem Conservation Commission Order dated August 14,2019 and Request for q Superseding Order of Conditions for New View Addiction Rehabilitiation and Educational Center Inc. (Michael Aeyer) 11 bay view rd Beverly MA. MassDP File#94-681. fhe following 10 citizens support this appeal flame Address Phone Number .�j I/&� La, M, 99r W3 9q 637.3 id A q4dl 70 maw 4"jr-- S �C� 1 �G � � 55�3 �� e i-561� e o��l© 7?'P91f--f5112- r (T A rIA14 S7 I J9 q7i? 7yy-�3?7 �►i� �- a3 P s S qW NV- s3r-� Co � �� '1 �� Li i-oxp� C - f i s. All if a^ ••��w � ..j r�'r� 7 "'y. .�� `y.����v`°�•�;'�L•...,'ei:F.',E•�•-�3�7 YR...: X'.^.' -�1',. ;. - �f'r•i:r�+�k` y .�`.� .,E .-..cz ��e S." s[' y �� F _r:'�7:. - - .. . �_.- .,`5- - 'ice - -r�;_Y.r-_ 3��..��-.:�-.., _x.::-•`^'' y� •:tom,_>��; -.. _- - _ _ _ . f• 1 � w• fir.' �.yr ...•_.!C�:�� ' ." . �.;� 1{+�.11�'f���J^4G..N..Si.1 ���,.�v,q'- •--i�-r — �•.s - .� � � � \ » . \ \��\� \ ° ■ < - \'�\ 47z � e2 • '-l j � �r^+� a e ti.Fe • � 1 YY = 3 `F �� ��'- l- •�] t x't ; .. 4 5 Tpr` j-iLV 'pY,A tw •�.Po tir �•. PAX�� 3 i r [-•may:t;• �;��i::; - .+}_ .. - ,�-. -:';-Y".:c:�, { 'W w��s .. :�'E.r ..�-'sir-, •?t:•-s;k� .. �- d .�incs For o,�=Use A* Commonwealth of Massechlusetts offln qf$„Wronnunta,Affairs f Exacutive Office of Environmental EL 1k, IF Affairs It MEPA ONO@ EOEA No.: 13 Sy r MEPA Analyst W. crag z Phone:517-626- Eno w1wr Env!Environmental /02 S Notification Form The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act,301 CMR 11.00. Pr 'ect Name: Former Salem MGP Propeft Remedlatlon Project at Collins Cove Street 20 Plerce Avenue Munici I' : Salem Watershed: North Shore Coastal Draingge Area Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude:42 31, 5711 N:4710673 m; E:346355 m Longitudw.70 53' 04° Estimated commencement date: 11/01/05 Estimated completion date:02/01/06 roximate cost*$400 000.00 Status of Epiect desl :mco e% Proponent Massachusetts Electric Co. Street:25 Research Drive Municipality:w State: MA Zip Code:01582 Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Ken Fields Finn/ : BSC Group Street: l5 EfEcins Street Municipality:Boston State:MA Zip Code:02127 Phone: 617-896.43oo Fax 617 1 E-mail:Kfields0bacgroup.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold(see 301 CMR 11.03)? Dyes ®No Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ❑Yes(EOEA No. } ®No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EOEA No. _ :} ®No Is this an Expanded ENF(see 301 CMR 11.05(7))requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) Dyes ®No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) []Yes ®No a Waiver of mandatory EIR?(see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes ®No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) uYes ®No Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): The project does not require any financial assistance or land transfer from a Commonwealth agency. Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional,or local agency'? ®Yes(Specify DEP Waterwa PMgram []No List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: Order of Conditions,Salem Conservation Commission;PGP Authorization,Category 2,US ACOE Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s)does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): ❑ Land ❑ Rare Species ®Wetlands,Waterways, &Tidelands ❑Water ❑Wastewater ❑ Transportation ❑ Energy ❑Air ❑ Solid&Hazardous waste ❑ACEC ❑ Regulations ❑ Historical&Archaeological _ Resources Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permlts& & Environmental Impacts Approvals Omer of Conditions Total site acreage 20.7 ❑Superseding Order of Conditions New acres of land altered 1.9 ®Chapter 91 License Acres of impervious area - - ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification Square feet of new bordering 0 ❑MHD or ion Access vegetated wetlands alteration Permit Square feet of new other W-SIAM V. ❑Water Management wetland alteration ( Act Permit 411r,00. ❑New Source Approval (9-775if) ❑DEP or MWRA ---� (oonw eal Sewer Connection/ Acres of new non-water- Extension Permit dependent use of tidelands or 0 ❑Other Permits waterways (ftidi dt la" A M;nwab)— Specify: Gross square footage - - Number of housing units - - Maraimum height(in feet) Vehicle trips per day - - - Parking spaces - - - Gallons/day(GPD)of water use - - - GPD water withdrawal - - GPD wastewater generation/ - - treatment Length of water/sewer mains(in - - miies) G4N$ERVATIOIJLAND:Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural renounces to any purpose not in accordance with Amide 97? Dyes(Specify —) ®No Will it Involve the release of any conservation restriction,preservation restriction,agricultural preservation restriction,or watershed preservation restriction? Oyes(specify--.---— ) ®No RARE SPECf ES:Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species,Vernal Pools,Priority Sites of Rare Species,or Exemplary Natural Communities? Uyes(Specify --) ®No HISTORICAL!ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURVJ Does the project site Include any structure,site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? 13Yes(Specify ) ®No if yes,does the project involve any demolition or destniction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? 0Yes(Specify--- ❑No AREAS OF COMCAL-ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN:Is the project In or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concem? ❑Yes(Specfty ) ®No PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include(a)a description of the project site, (b)a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each altematnre,and(c)potential on-slte and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative(You may attach one aal& onel Rage, if necessary.) Massachusetts Electric Company("MEC)is proposing a proactive remediation project within the Collins Cove intertidal zone including coastal beach and coastal bank that are located on MEC and adjacent KeySpan Energy Delivery New England("KeySpan")properties. The project has been designed to eliminate the littoral transport of miscellaneous fill material that comprises the existing armoring on the MEC and KeySpan beaches to other beaches located south of the project site. Evidence shows that in the past this debris material has migrated with neamhore cwm*and has been transported to and deposited on adjacent beaches within Collins Cove.This project is part of remedial actions taken to address and meet the requirements for the Massachusetts Contingency Plan(MCP) (310 CMR 40.0000). The site is a Tier IS Disposal Site,assigned Release Tracking Number RTN 3-1709 by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(DEP). (a) The properties are located along 20 Pierce Avenue and Waite Street in Salem,Massachusetts and were once the location of a manufactured gas plant. The site abuts Collins Cove to the east.Beverly Harbor to the north,and residential neighborhoods to the south and west. The project wilt occur on an 82-acre parcel owned by KeySpan and a 12.5-acre parcel owned by Massachusetts Electric Co. Miscellaneous fill material associated with the operations of the former MGP is present on the coastal beach. This miscellaneous fill material Includes bricks and rubble that function as armament of the beach and hank.hardened coal tar,clinker,and cinders. This material,the hardened coat tar in particular,has been identified as a source of polpc. Ic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)to other portions of Collins Cove because the miscellaneous fill material Is susceptible to erosion,subsequent mechanical weathering into smaller particles,and the smaller particles are transported to other areas within the cove. Other portions of the beach and bank are armored with rip-rap,and a seawall armors a portion of the bank. The armored coastal bank protects utlitty-related structures including:an earthen containment dike that surrounds an existing liquefied natural gas(LNG)storage and distnbution facility,and, electric power transmission line support tower foundations. (b) The preferred aftemative is to place a multiolayer cap that includes:placing a geotextile material over the existing beach fill materials;and,placing a riprsp layer over the geotextile. This capping will restrict the transport of surface material from the beach,thereby isolating the contaminated sediment and debris from the waters of Collins Cove. The riprap layer will stabilize the beach area,protect the geotextile material from wave action,and prevent erosion by providing improved armor for the coastal beach. The rlprap gradation and layer thickness will be based on analysis of stability of the dprap for the 100-year return frequency storm event. All work will be conducted at the lower end of the tide-cycle to minimize impacts to water quality. The reinforced geotextile material will cover approximately 31,000 square feet of coastal beach. The cap will extend from the toe of the coastal beach to the top of the coastal bank. The cap will begin approximately 270 feet to the south of the Steel Tower located on the eastern edge of the property. The cap will be 100 feet wide at the southern end and will extend approximately 940 feet north along the beach. It will be approximately 110 feet at its widest point and 60 feet in the middle at its narrowest point. The cap size will vary in width depending on the beach width. At the northern end,the cap will taper and join to meet the existing granite seawall. The capping of areas of natural beach sediment will be minimized to the extent possible. This alternative wig continue to allow for beach nourishment from an offshore sediment source to pass over the armored beach to down drift sites. A barrier beach exists south of the project site due to the sediment being carried via long shore drift past the project site. The proposed stabilization expects only to affect the eroded material transport from the project site and will minimize transporting the contaminants associated with this material,reducing impacts to the down drift beaches. This alterative will stabilize and improve protected resource areas,and serve to most the goals of the MCP. The two other alternatives examined as part of this filing include:'no action'and dredging the miscellaneous fill material. The alternative of Ono action!would perpetuate the transport of the contaminated sediment onto abutting properties and into Collins Cove. Because the'�m action"altemative will not meet remediation goals under the MCP,it is not acceptable.The third alternative would be to dredge or excavate the miscellaneous fill material and remove It to an upland landfill. Dredging in this area would tend to undermine adjacent structures. Stabilization is of particular Importance in areas where the armored shoreline supports the adjacent fire access roadway for the LNG facility,the seawall protecting the gas storage tank,and the foundation for the support tower for the electrical power transmission lines. The preferred alternative Is expected to provide better protection for the utility structures while accomplishing the remedial objective of containing the miscellaneous fill material. A dredging alternative would also be expected to create greater dbhurbance to the area,Increase turbidity and suspend contaminated sediment,and expose subsurface Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid(NAPL). In order to stabilize the coastline after dredging,some armament would still be required for a dredging alternative. The potential for destabilization of the above mentioned structures and the potential for increased negative environmental impacts make the dredge alternative unacceptable. (c) The project is a mitigation protect designed to address historic uses of the site that have led to the current potential for off site contamination. The capping will prevent the further spreading of sediment contaminants into the ocean habitat and to abutting properties along the shoreline. The preferred alternative includes measures cdeftned to rn!9 g for the impeft to the".c' -tW r�i2"r'u=s'f.'=. r�aZl�i7ii iy^t�W pldf o'meer `of the Cap, riprAp will be added to stabilize the cap and to protect the cap from wave action and prevent erosion. The dprap material will also contain sufficient void spaces to provide rocky intertidal habitat areas and to allow for the natural movement of passing sediment(i.e.not contaminated from the site)for the continued nourishment of down drift coastal beaches. Construction related impacts wig be minimized through tide sensitive work schedules,and the temporary placement of layered sand bags on the seaward side of the work area. A haybale and silt fence barrier will be used to protect a nearby salt marsh during construction. There are three other MCP directed projects within the same Collins Cove area. Two temporary pilot tests projects in the inter-Wal area will test alternative methods for treating NAPL in the sediments. Neither Project triggers MEPA review thresholds,as they impact smaller areas. They are described here to provide the reviewer information relative to overall combined Impacts. The first project will test in-situ bloremedkdon,which involves the mixing of the Inter-tidal flat sediment with microbial nutrients used to stimulate indigenous micro-organisms that biodegrade the existing NAPL located within the top three feet of tidal flat sediments. The second project proposes to instal three temporary concrete trenches along the toe of the armored coastal beach to test the volume of NAPL that can be collected and the frequency of required maintenance that would be needed should this become the selected alternative. The test trenches will be ten feet long,three feet wide,by three feet deep (1V x3'W)and will be oriented parallel to the shoreline. These test trenches will contain a sorbent material used to collect the NAPL present in the sediment. The trenches will be covered by a removable Triton Mattress®cap. A landside project involving the installation of a 4.93-acre geocomposite liner cap system is in the final stages of completion. Of the capped area,210,500 sq ft of the ground surface is paved while the remainder Is covered with gravel. The landside-capping project was designed to reduce the amount of precipitation infiltrating into the subsurface and the subsequent migration of compounds of concern to coastal resource areas. �+ t�t ax C f 1' � /fir+ �••r 'ln `'at{` f��1 our r- Mr � � ;art \ �, 1J •n.� PA I t tI .:jr: ti x� tit < . t �' !� �:. ?t} � ,�'►w� �'.!x� �r��: •��ri tit}�,.� 'S�y�.�%"`�'� �1 r a Ali s3-�sar��� CHARt.ES E.IOdIGHT,JR. 43 49 MARY E.KNIGHT 5 EAST COWNS 978-740-1002. SM",MA 01970 DATE 144 OFMMOFJ �•• •�dL � + �CrSS OD -_DOLLARS. �. :. - Na#ioxd Gmnd,$ank 1:0 1 1 304 3001:' 4349 Copies have been provided to: New View Addiction Rehabilitation and Educational Center, Inc 11 Bay Street Beverly, MA 01915 City of Salem Conservation Commission City Hall Annex 98 Washington Street 2nd Floor Salem MA 019170 City of Salem Planning Department City Hall Annex 98 Washington Street 2"d Floor Salem MA 01970 i i I� �1 � _ I .: i ��� I� Appendix C Reduced Size 11x17 Plan Sets Civil Plans Site Redevelopment Plans 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA Prepared for New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. (Sheets C-1 through C-8, and L-1) prepared by The Morin Cameron Group,Inc. dated July 22,2019,last revised August 15,2019 Architectural Plans New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center,Inc. 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheets A-1.1 through A-2.4) prepared by Bisbano&Associates,Inc. dated August 15,2019 i I i �� �� � l _ �� ��. . �� _ .. �. 'L ,�l �i � 1�1 �� 1 � I �I , SITE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR 05�� NEW VIEW ADDICTION REHABILITATION & EDUCATION CENTER, INC. M � PARCEL Of � � 0 AT Q� did s BURN 1.3 EAST COLLINS STREET SIDE ST SALEM; MASSACHUSETTS CYST u> (ASSESSOR'S MAP 36, LOT 277) OUNANT ST BEA N ST PEARL 5T BARTON ST LOCUS MAP oW � � o � SCALE:t'--'DD't SCHEDULE OF PLAN SET DRAWINGS: C-1 COVER SHEET � C-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN APPLICANT: C-3 EROSION CONTROL & SITE PREPARATION PLANS , �y ` C NEW VIEW ADDICTION REHABILITATION & —4 SITE LAYOUT PLAN EAST COLLINS STREET Itn EDUCATION CENTER, INC. _ z C-5 GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN N 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET m m SALEM, MA 01970 0 L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-2 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN RECORD OWNER:_ C-6 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS I 44 MARK P. CLIFFORD C-7 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS II ` 176 LAKE STREET o C-8 SITE CONTEXT PLAN j MIDDLETON, MA 01949 PROPOSD ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 37343, PAGE 494 H 3-STORY BUILDING 4f 3 EAST CIVIL ENGINEER LAND SURVEYOR: � ABBREVIATIONS: ItI STREET THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP, INC. LOTAC AIR CONDITIONING UNIT T NAREA.11,74 Sn.F. m °d ACR ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP 66 ELM STREET 7,5f o AVE Ac AVERAGEBOTTOM CURB DANVERS, MA 01923 BCC BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CURB & 's 5 PHONE: 978-777-8586 BDRM BEDROOM OH BULK HEAD BIT EK �INWS BUILDING ARCHITECT: BM BENCHMARK PROPOSED PARHOBG EAT RED BARN ARCHITECTURE BOIL Baum BOTTO 84 HIGH STREET .VW BORDERING VEGETATED WETLAND ° CB CATCH BASIN IPSWICH, MA 01938 CBDH CONCRETE BOUND DRILL HOLE :'1° cmCAPE EEnDUCTILE -- PHONE: 978-595-6764 m Cur RDN z CIF CHAIN FENCE ' � _ O ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: g 0. CONC CONCRETEIFTE oI DLEPTTH IRON • ` ` • � \'�'� LEC ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. �w �Z �' 380 LOWELL STREET w m DOIAMMH DIAMETER . �•. GRAIN MANHOLE "c.Y •i• • • • 1 � E EAST • . • ` ' 1L WAKEFIELD, MA 01880 z(n vwi = Dili ELECTRIC HAND HOLE • • I\ �.� PHONE: 781-245-2500 z �� ELEC ELECTRIC • ` • • • ` • r a J Q z U ELEV/EL ELEVATION . . . . . . . . . . ` B3 EP/EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT J ud Vl 8p EKIST DOSTING ILA _ _."T . . .I 0 O V7 w Z FF FIRST FLOOR 1``. ` • . .1 �•i' JU �Q PvoO FND FOUND FG FINISH GRADE -�'^. . . . . . y' N g Q GAR GARAGE / • • • `�\ Lu In W W ¢p � GEN GENERAL . . . GLFA GROSS LEASABLE FLOOR AREA " ` . `��. rill' •I Mv< WW I Lu = U ELAR FERAL NOTE: SCALE 1'a 3D' THESE PLANS ARE PREPARED FOR OUR CLIENTS USE ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE i OF OBTAINING PERMITS AND LOCAL APPROVALS,AND ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REUm 0 15 30 60 UPON AS A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT OR ANY OTHER USE BY OTHERS WITHOUT THE Q WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE MCRIN-CAMERON GROUP,INC. V Q PROD.0500A 1 _ I , I 1 � IJ N/F -4MAP 36,LOT 246 � `� ,\\ \ \ V •M JO•w�w< N/F TNOTITY M.CONNELL \\ \ N CONUBL FAMILY IRREVOCABLE GENERAL NOTES: 0 EAST COOLLLLI S STREET E LOT 4� 1. THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR OUR CLIENTS USE ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF OBTAINING MAP 36,LOT 249 PERMITS AND LOCAL APPROVALS,AND IS NOT TO BE USED OR REDO UPON AS A I/ i� \ �p \ /F CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT OR ANY 07HER USE BY OTHERS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF q-' CB u` / JCHELSEA H9EVERLYBII&RI(E y� THE MORIN-CAMERDN GROUP.INC. a5 RIM=7,92 J25 PLANTERS STREET / 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ODMPRID FROM A PLAN TITLED PLAN OF LAND SHOWING EXISTING - - -- PAYED 9_A.�' \ MAP 36,LOT 243 O CONDITIONS TO ACCOMPANY A CONSERVATION COMMISSION NOTICE OF INTENT APPLICATION',AS �_- .-x�w OHW oHw m z PREPARED BY PA7ROWICZ LAND OEVELOPIIFNT ENGINEERING AND FIELD VERIFIED BY THE VGC _ OHw ! ¢ t z. =W MOR91-CAMERON GROUP,INC. THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON WAS DETERMINED BY 1� _COLLINS STREET o '" (p V � 8��� THE MORIN-CAMERON GROUP,INC. w w w �w w _ w w o 3. ABUTTER INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF SALETI ASSESSORS AND q5 DATABASES s S (I3 \ S _T DMH ,G N/F C 4. ALL UNDERGRDUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE M c c aPPR GAS MAIN c 9 - - c--yUM=&37 O—=� ¢y3Y�� ¢ KWI B.SURLES u �. o DETERMINED N THE FIELD.BEFORE DESIGNING,EXCAVATING,BLASTING,INSTALLING,BACKFlWNG, O �i 'I- dD PUNTERS STREET rc_ GRADING,PAVEMENT RESTORATION,REPAVING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION,ALL UTILITY COMPANIES vGc so_ti O O O--F- •1\ y '�8 MAP 3s,L07 24a �z m MUST BE NOTIFIED INCLUDING THOSE IN CONTROL OF UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.SEE PAVED SIDEWALK UGLAS U CHAPTER 370,ACTS OF 19M MASSACAUSEFTS CALL-DIG SAFE'AT 1-888-344-7733.THE 94.5D' MORIN-CAMERON GROUP,INC.ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A / 4a ARE � f 1j}.( RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN.BEFORE FUTURE CONNECTIONS,THE 1 a BIT.CONC. PAYED A APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS MUST BE CONSIIL7ID. b� � RIM=7,8 It- =m 5. BY EXAMINATION OF THE CURRENTLY APPLICABLE FEMA FLOOD MAP THIS PROPERTY LIES VATHIN /em s. \ \ \ Fr0 �0 A ZONE AE(EL-10)AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP,COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 7' --- \ / N/F a 25009OD417G WHICH BEARS AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY 16,2014. PAUL B.& - �'• \ Qi� HILARY L UNWAN U G. WETLAND RESOURCE AREAS WERE IDENTIFIED AND FLAGGED BY LED ENVIRONMENTAL \ d�PLANTERS STREET CONSULTANTS,INC ON MAY 21.2019 AND LOCATED IN THE FIELD BY THE MORIN-CAMERON m MAP 36.LOT 2.45 GROUP,INC.THE TOP OF COASTAL BANK SHOWN HEREON IS BASED DINTOPOGRAPHY AND LOCATION OF FfDAA BASE FLOOD ELEVATION USING MASSDPOLICYEP POLICY� OR2-1. P` _——_— EXISTING ONE-ST BUILDING yc �' (FOOTPRINT AREA-5,240 SFt) SOTSb�. ZONING MATRIX / 10" `ZONE,D - `` Y TOP OU COASTAL BANK i ~ 3 FAST RESIDENTIAL ONE / i ' 8 yAp j S / G FAMILY(R1) J ��F AREA-41,746tSF. —~T �OHw rnm /J Ile ARK i T SETBACK REQUIRED i MARY E.KNIGHT MIN.LOT AREA I5,000 SF / #MAP FAS 3�LOT 2ia� 1 / / 2, I _-8.\ `F_8 ' \ & APPRO%LOCATION 10' PATIO MIN.LOT AREA PER UNIT 15,0D0 SF _ I4 WIDE GAS EASEMENT MN.LOT FRONTAGE 100 FT I 1 / (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) a MIN,LOT WIDTH 100 FT MAX LOT COVERAGE MIN.OPEN SPACE BIT.CONC. m R MIN.FRONT YARD DEPTH 15 FT BIT.CONC. MIN.SIDE YARD WIDTH 10 FT _ PAVEMENT PAVEMENT MIN.REAR YARD DEPTH 30 FT M A IL MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FT - U /CS -17� -- U RI18.28 _ MAX BUILDING STDRIES 25 MIN.BUILDING SEPARATION 40 FT e \ / / I\ NA \ \ NEW ENGLAND POWER CO ob \ MAP 36,LOT 234 RIF GLEN CAROL A MA'NARD m �i n e k- - `.\ 70P OF COSTAL 651 OSG STREET /1/a BANK A .'y\„'t \ `\-/ �� 5 MAP 36,,LOT 273 1- 12 r 3�4 �' \ \ _ 4 \ •�� S cb \ \ 33 SALT MARSH r r \\; \l\• 11 \ \. '\BsI It 7 C.40,AU- a,tK _: r�r-� cV`_� /[ \ j1 mtk AL _g-- T9121 e --Y.SwI,A i SALT MARSH ,ri �\ ---_- • e ) r _y \\ `\ m \ \ �APPRIUX OFF-S1TE V� Z \ -__ _ WEIAND BOIIDARY 0 r s \ \\ \ \\ \ 8 Z Q �- � \\ \ Q CH.91 WATER DEPENDENT USE ZONE(WDUn \ c h� \\ \\ !� cOo'\ t a LJ Z CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS `COASTAL D ` /' �'\r ` ° " `i f \ \ -3 _ m AVERAGE DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT LINE=243.2' (SAND1� / \\ ,�gBe ,� \ U �\ \\ Z N N =d' WDUZ LINE=0.25 X AVG.DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT LINE s511, =60.8'OFFSET MEASURED FROM MHW _ '/ —� c ,� ,�\: \Y•� � f^� W Ln _ L Z COASTAL BEACH \ 1 215.531 I COASTAL :'/ �/ O N BEACH777 m2 / (SANDY BEACH) -- (SANDY BEAGI)/ \\ \ C) m Q Pj c Q SALT MARSH\ / \(GRASSES) \ / (~P1 0 Q LLJ Q W W Q 0 \ Ito < ww -CH.91 FACILITY OF PUBLIC T 5 - --------- N/F \\ \\ ACCOMODATION(FPA) 1� ------ \ CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS N LLI NEW ENGLAND POWER CO. \ - FPA UHE=100'OFFSET Z 7! __ MAP 36,LOT 234 MEASURED FROM MHW i APPROX LOCATION 10' COLLINS COVE _ �, PLAN F F Z U WADE GAS EASEMENT \\ \ \ Z fZ z (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) (B£V£RLY HARBOR) `\ SCALE: 1'-20'\ o to zo ao U ;E g PRO,.#3500.A i I if �I If ! 1 � 1 , MAP 36,LOT 246 N/F TIMOTHY Y CONNELL \ \ N .CONNETl FAMILY IRREI9CABLE TRUST /8 MAP GOWNS a5�ET / \ \ 0 EAST COLLINS STREET CONTACT NATIONAL GRID To / \\ 1 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE MAP 36,LOT 249 COORDINATE GAS DISCONNECTION CUT ANDAP \ \ AND NEW SERVICE EASTAATER '� s \ N/F 10 PREVENT EXCESSIVE EROSION AND SILTING THE FTLIOYMNG CONSTRUCTION SERO AT MAN N .�, CHEM BEVERLY& SEQUENCE COUPLED WITH OTHER WIDELY ACCEPTED PRINCIPLES FOR REDUCING RIM=7.92 ]] < JONATHAN JOSEUA BURKE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF � A \rt\ Q, 125 PLANTERS STREET THE SITE ;:i'(T�� 'ONw OHw- ¢ MAP 36,L07 243 i. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE APRE-CONSTRUC110N NEETNG AT f0f • ^'f z(EAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITH THE OWNER 1-4 ' 9_ L S-T` COLLINS RE E T o 'A \ (OVINER'S REPRESENTA7WE). PLANNING oEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE AND 0 .,;Z� $a gl �W w W w �-\ �r� ANY OTHER INTERESTED OIYy DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVES. N [[ _� -- WCUJ_R LINE QMH µ s s SCP\� 1 2. STABILIZATION PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE INSTXM PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES PLACE p s— N/F } I G G APP��(7GAS FIN G --- G M=8.32 c 9i H NeM B.--S EROSION (X1HIRDIS AT LOCATIONS INDICATED ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT < .,� °¢3 4i 'j0" - �j 127 PLANTERS STREET PLANS —D - VCC 0 D D O D �\ y �p '/- MAP 36,LOT 244 - PAYED SIDEWALK uCE U 3. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE L .. W SAWCUT PAVEMENT BR.L'ONC. 4. N PREPARING TO REMOVE MATERIALS FROM THE WORK AREA ON THE S17E, B 4 �� yp l� .gory c'�£ CAREFUL CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO THE OCIW OF DLS URBANCE E PAVED AREA bjp `¢ SO AS NOT TO DISTURB MORE OF THE SIZE THAN WHAT IS INTENDED TO BE T JJ RIM IMMEDIATELY DEVELOPED AND RE-STABIUZED. y O AyyeE�:;, o p IS / TO OB�TITT \ 1 tV„ FENCE ALONG 'T'� \ / NJ. 5. LOAM AND TOP 500.EXCAVATED FROM THE W(LIX AREA SHALL BE STOCK / AN �- I TRACTOR. IF HIURY PROPERTY LINE L UNBiAN MATERIALS ARE SIDCKPILED ON PILED AT A LOCATION TO BE �W4IERE THEY WILL BY THE SITE �NNOT INTERFERE \\ \ Re PLANTERS STREET WITH CONSTRICTION ACTIVITIES,THEY SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS TO MINIMIZE s•,, O FENCE TO BE R 444\\\ NAP 36.LOT 245 THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE OR REMOVED 8 ' REMOVE UTILITY POLE PRIOR TO NEILAND RESOURCE AREAS STOCKPILES aeit BE STABILIZED WITH fi EXISTING ONE-STORY BUILDING BULDIHG CONSTRUCTION �/ / HAYBALES,SILT FENCING OR EQUNALENT. STOCKPILES LEFT FOR GREATER (FOOTPRINT AREM5,240 SRI) (COORDINATE PATH NATIONAL GRID) THAN 14 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH AN EROSION CONTROL MIX.117 L`t ——_——(TO BE RAZED) \ PROP.MU 6. REMOVAL OF ALL DEBRIS OR MATERIAL FROM THE WORK AREA SHALL BE / IOU BUFER ZONE TO � � �� _ /� SOCK �\ / DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL. STATE, AND LOCAL EDP OF'COASTAL BANK i �� / \ / REGULATIONS UNDER THE OVERSIGHT OF A LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL r , �y� {{II 3 EAST ONw / Ght' $ (LSP)HIRED BY THE OWNER IF APPUCAME. w FR COLJNS STREET O oTw CHAILESN/E.k P MAP AREM1,746t S.F. 7pp���ta DEI - e / r 1s EAsrRYcaLwe�SiREET ( / /� Lbgy7� 70 ( 1a SAFE MAP 36,LOT 278 I 9 /\ O I B` _ APPROX LOCATION 10' R\�ME-N7y B PATIO r0 I \ \REMOVED PATIO WIDE GAS EASEMENT L I / (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) l a EXIST.FENCE— BE REMOVED FEASTING PAVEMENT \ / / 4 TO BE RIMM r m m DOST.CATCH BASIN TO BE I _ PAVEMENT / Bit PAVEMENT REMOVED(PUMP.CAP E)OST. ��� PIPE,CRUSH AND RAGQTLL) / / ;UBE PROPOSED SEBBR r FORf AY 'A 1 /B DURING CONSTRUCTION TN&pcAN _ REMOVE 24-LF OF EXIST. RI .26 TIED PRIOR SAWCUT PAVEMENT 'y a 2-FT TALL RAILROAD TIE WALL/ ENAL LOAM '\` ALONG PROPERTY LINE '♦q,. 88-344���"� 16 1 7 X / / I\ N� "ab PLANT DAMAGE 0 �_ \ NEW ENGIAND POWER W. NOTE: ad 'Al �) _� _�� -_ \ MAP 36,LOT 234 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED T - / AMR OF = - \` lk, UPON VISIBLE ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND RECORD INFORMATION OF BELOW GROUND URLRTES AND ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR // - -•g-� �� x�� \ ° // 1 TAKING ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS BEFORE BEGINNING GLEN A& a ' S it SM3 n�< CE F JLT „- 1.``\ \ �.�,�/\ \�! ` I / l ANY EXCAVATION. m 'd '+� / > CAROL 0.MAYNARO m � r-v. \w- TOP OF COASTAL 151 OSGOOD STREET MAP 36. £ i'�ram,/�' e / \ BARK \\\ \�(♦♦ / 4 LOT 273 _"�9Y1 �. m r 4\ c ` \\ /f �EgST.VEGETATED BERM i� '♦ ' r m r�� r • '� " 7O BE PROTECTED, \ \(\ \\ \ S\' r \ c SALT MARSH . MAINTAM EX15T:/ 11J \ \ \ \♦ CONSTRUCT PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN,ADD ACCESS PAIH�/�1 e ry\ l \ \ \ `: \ ♦ 6'LOAM AND SEED PER LASCAPE ND PLAT 1O SHORELINE L 6 \ CO.TF \\ `\j \\♦ ' (ENSURE FULL ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION z PRIOR TO INTRODUCING STORMWATER RUNOFF) �l'\ -6--�- ` r -�sNf� r�i` SALT MARSH r\ I \ \ Yr CDT £ \ --- /-- �. . (stiA556) , \ �\ 1 PROP.SILT FENCE ------' _ , sat \ AT UNIT�WORIEDARSITEY z WEILAND 0 CH.91 WATER DEPENDEM USE ZONE(WDUZ) -\ 1 \ �� fL9� _ Mil J Z CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS COTS L \rA13`" _ L+M mm AVERAGE DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT UNE=2432' (SAIEDY) / \ a •' `\L \s \ �FLv Q WDUZ UNE-0.25 X AVG.DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT LINE �� II� \ \ Z N 2 -60.8'OFFSET MEASURED FROM MHW '`ca3 \ r\ may;,4�SE2A �� W� ME: [C Z \ / COASTAL BEACH \ ¢\¢ suit I m12 /''' CL ¢ F U 1 1 , .�.�/ D U I¢ U Z - - - -' /�2- (SANDY BEAdI) _- COASTAL BEACH 77 \ \ (SANDY EiE1CH)/ \ \ / \\�v )N.\ o W¢ � �U ' \ - / LLJ\\ �I'7 N w W i' CH.91 FACILITY OF PUBLIC --'- -------------' \\ \\- ADOOMODARON(FPA - -5_- ------ HIT \ CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS N LLJ Z -----T - ---- NEW ENGLAND POWER CO. \ FPA UNE=10D'OFFSET MAP 36.LOT 234 \ \\ MEASURED FROM MHW J- ~ r ---- i APPROX LOCATION 16 COLLINS COVE �� \:� \\\ a z C) -/-- WIDE GAS EASEMENT \ ♦ \ PLAN us %S (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) (BEVERLY HARBOR) SCALE:r-20' C - C3 O 1D 20 40 $a 0 PROJ.135CIDA � � J Yi a � — I . f . 1 I` �! + �` � I` �� 1 � � tz— UJI IAALINb blN I �/' x_J W < N/F MAP 36,LOT 246 `\ M.CONNELL CONNELL FAMLY IRREVOCABLE fS EAST COLLINS STREET \ PARKING TABLE GUST MAP 36,LOT 491 \\ ,.O \ iB EAST GOWNS STREET l \ MAP 36,LOT 249 Y� \ MEDICAL CLWIC:THREE(3)SPACES PER 3 PROFESSIONS BONS z 3+ �^' c / �A�AJOSNE UALBURKE ' PROFESSIONAL PERSON,PLUS ONE(1)SPACE i6 OTHER EMPLOYEES z D.5• /75 PLANTERS STREET PER EACH TWO(2)OTHER EMPLOYEES 17 SPACES REQUIRED MAP 35,LOT 243 O_ wAVE6 51 W TOTAL PROVIDED 18 SPACES vs _anw aHw E.AST COLLINS STREET p\ cn Us I G G I A�ROXGGAS MAIN G G '�y 7 PUNTERS STREET \ %[,��y) _Z # VGC t, VGC O e� MAP 36.LOT 244 I PAVED ALK � ® B s� 19' 9y LJ.s m CLIMATE F1<I519EG m q .':. N/F NDN-CONFORMING 2Y. e. SETBACK '' �� $•Y (29 PLANTERS STREET MAP 38.LOT 245 3P PROPOSED 3— Y BUILDING (FOOTPRINT AREA=4.860 SO \ / t00'BUFFER ZONE TO � —FlRSL FLOOR=11.5 / TOP B COASTAL BANK ID0-YEAR ROOD ElEHAT(QH=t0.0 / 6 PROP.CAPE COD BERM T YEIMY //11 3 EAST ' ALONG PROPERTY LINE j/ COLLINS STREETT w+w n roo p MAIN MAP 36.LOT 277 �-- �V7• .pNW P9 1 CHARLES E.4 ENTRANCE AREA>•41,7462 SF. i EASr MARY E.KNIGHT ' 05 MAP COWNS 36,LOT 2STREET lh I `78 APPROX LOCATION 10' PROP.GRASS PAYERS FOR WIDE GAS EASEMENT (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) m /EMERGOECYVt]tICLE ACCESS ::.::. �.•.'.��...,:.1.8, I tT I 3 PROPTo .iirgm PUBLIC ACCESS ..PROP.HANDICAP PROP.PARKING LOT m R ACCESS (iB TOTAL SPACES) / BIT. PAVEMENT R REIM EXIST.PAVED PARKING LOT TRASH AND _ @ -- $+ W1711N 1H6E AREAS h REPLACE YATFI ..........: RECYCLING :'"':' :! VEGETATLD STORMWATER FEATIINES ENCLOSURE I I �� .. .... .... .............1..:. `� _ g ............. .. ..... L , D 1 ______ ______ ___ ________ ____ � NEW ENG D POWER CO. � zsr• �. SNOW STORAGE MAP 36,LOT 234 91 = r5 GLEN 0.4 CAROL A MAYNARD m ��PROP.LIGHT e e c --TOP of COASTAL•�' Aj% g51 OSGOOD STREET pOLE`(TY'P.)a BANK 'd MAP 35,LOT 273 �- "PROP.PATH TOyTE1BB4ATE / \ m AT E)0ST ACCESS POINT e SALT MARSH dZ � 1 � \ N ` CONC.WAU- � �k ��� SALT MARSH el � �� .� ` , bo r k APPROX OFF—SIZE f/) Z 4 � ¢ c 1 "�BSItP \.4 \ \ gElUNU BOUNDARY Q a / �1 r CH.91 WATER DEPENDENT USE ZDNE(WO _ \ J,/J \�, COe �4,., EL W Z CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS `COASGL W11 1 'fir r x '��/ 4m13 \` w C m AVERAGE DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT UNE•243.2' (SANDY) l / 9LI9 4 N 1W Q WDUZ UNE•0.25 X AM DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT LINE / U S'uIt4Y;' II Z S .BQB'pFFstr MEASURED FROM MHW W3� �•\. �ILsn4 Vy ,�,..a•---�_ W Ln 9= z COASTAL BEACH ` ` `•�. B{U w \ �911 CD12 � g[Qn fip0 /D2/ (�Y BEACH) �. •215.58 SASLAL BEACH ~`°•••`..•,-, y�� 777 co)-O P Tn g F z (SANDY BEApE)/ SALT MARSH --"`• ' Q O (MASSES) Ln o Q pw w ¢O / w vN W LLJ I 1- CH.91 FACILITY OF PUBLICACCOMODATION S CALCULATED AS(FOLLOWS W NEW ENGLANO POWER CO. FPA UNE•10V OFFSET Z / MAP 31,LOT 234 MEASURED FROM MHW WA�ElEV.4.3 _ / 5� U / APPROX LOCAnoN 1o' COLLINS COVE \ PLAN WIDE GAS EASEMENT �\ / (FL BK 447 PLAN T)) (BEVERLY HARBOR) SCE V=20' CL �\ / 0 10 20 40 N PRQL#=.A i i i I . � _ I , I . L I . L U h N/F TIMOTHYTCONNELLj '.._ ...__._._ I .\\N s CONNELL FAMILY IRREVOCABLE 06 TRUST MST COLLINS6,L SWEET PROP.TAPPING SLEEVE--I MB EAST COWNS STREET k GATE VALVE \ .1 1 MAN EHTFtANCE MAP 36.LOT 249 •BRIM .92 t / JgNATHPN JOSHPUNTERS S BUIM EET /2M P 36. O STREET NAP 36.LOT 243 �� PAYEO SOEW ONW _-6- 11.34 \ O ��- iAST_"�COLLINS SCREE o ��cn£ 7C&70. 9.NT9 .94 11.�a -�8•� _ iJz� }v -31 1 < A' s : w --PRO�WIY COPPER(TYPE K) w-� W \'S BC0'. NAND- f1\iTe* (S=a 11.32 9 W 8 _ DOM Cyl'ATIR�R C!- 1b SCAPNG a 'v a &9 a G ' T)•�JT N s - s s s� P I 5 5 � 9.f10 PROP. v�t f N� v �---4(S-MBV APPR .GAS MAN .8 6Hi IM=8.32 0 �FiRE i� /27K �MSRE� 9.78 &90"\LON�EIE WALK -O _-It ��FT p 0 \ e db,��\ L/('/MAP 36,LOT 244 9.78 4 Up r .a. 0 PAVED DEWALX U L4 C�"\ tt� '.r.. - V G ] .60 TC8J64 fill UU 0. . ��i ) RIM=7.66\ 4` PROP.GAS SERVICE(tSIIE, PROP.HANDICAP•ACCESS EQ8.34 N yy z DNETTYP�NED BY LOCATION NIFz o: A) QL C HLARY GRADING INSET PLAN L LINIFMN O W s /29 PLAN IIIRST 2TREETMAP 3 /45 SCALE: 1'=10' \I PROPOSED 3- Y BUILDING _ a (FOOTPRINT AREA=4,BBO SF) de- '&�-& F1REJFLOOR=11.5 1OO'BUFFER TIN TO 100-YEAR FLOOD EULN Tz-Iu0 / PROP.8'REVEAL CAPE COD / / v ` TOP OF COASTAL�K i ` ` .�� i BEPoI`ALONG PROPER UNE GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: ° ��TT✓✓ JI-3 EAST �" 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND MAIN COLLINS MAP 38,STREET ;. ATb•OHw ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON THESE `" f // N/F :i ENTRANCE AREA-41.7483 77 `, j am\ OH 'E PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND MARSTAKEN IN IKE IRLEiE%Aii Y5 EAST :^ / SEE INSET / �, rp�� FIELD. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE R DGOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND WHERE POSSBLE,M EASUREMENTS UPON AS BEING EXACT DR ARLEi / COWNS STREET FOR RAMP l COMPLETE THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES _,✓ MAP 36,LOT 278 +` I [ ORATING THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START e. SHALL BE VERIFIED N THE FO1D BY APPROX LOCATION 16 OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE TC 9.70 N / T MADE GAS EASEMENT UTILITY COMPANY.ANY GOVERNING PERMITTING AUTHORITY,AND'DIGSAFE'AT ..' I� t'. '\ (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) a� g / LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY,^� LOCATION OF TUXES AND THE ENGINEEER SHALLN NOTIFIED OTIFI WRITING OF �'•:.. ... B. .... ..:a '..'(L'1G. PROP.PUBLIC AND ACCESS/ APPROMY PRIATE IATEE REMEDIAL ACTION SHALL BE AKEN BMW PROCEEDTIES INTE)MERING WITH THE PROPOSED ING W1TH z1 csi 42x TC&BO........:...... z £ W&IO TCB.84 �' TO SHORp,yrE THE WORK. IT SHALL BE THE RES'ONSIBIIJTY OF THE CONTRACTOR iTF z f. BG8.34 / RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSE B BIT.CO.- WMVBIENTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. m 'm qmq sJ. PAVEMENT @ "i 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND " Td• PROP.SEDIMENT FOREBAY\ MAINTAINING ALL CONTROL POINTS AND BENCHMARKS NECESSARY FOR THE o :.. ! :.; I IIr I 0� :•:�`,. - f I I is END PROP.CAPE COD Bml 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE � THE ELECTRIC, N Id TELEPFIDNE COMPANIES GAS PROVIDER AND SALEM NUf CABLE UTILITY (2)PROP.B'MR GRAIN PIPES\\\ \ DEPARTMENTS TO VERIFY THE LOCATION, SIZE AND TYPE OF ALL UTILITIES A 7 / / \ MDR TO CONSTRUCTDN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE SAID UTILITY U B _ --.6.80 p _=g•5_ _. / (NV IN-7.0)(INV.OUT-&9) COMPANIES ADVANCE NOTICE OF WHEN THE UTILITY LINES WILL BE INSTALLED. oI� WATER AND SEWER NOTES: s 1. PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED NA 9 3 ` r r ¢ ^� •.`\ ♦t/ T� T 4 \ PROP.VEGETATED / ,. WITH THE SALEM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE w GLEN A t: m ��g ?��� I\ / qr�\ \ \ 1 DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR THE UTILITY - CAROL A MAYNARD i/ x ¢ c .E r y/ r TOP O'COASTAL / ♦ INFILTRATION BASIN,i A51 OSGOOD STREET f �=�'b' •" ' / BANK 7 / .���\ �� ♦ 9' \ \ ''" CONNECTIONS FOR THE BUILDING TO THE PROJECT CIVIL ENGWEE > a o MAP 36,LOT 27312 [ r , -- COST. .�\ \� ♦ I \ / e VEGETATED BERM ♦ i� 2. A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET CLEAR HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED m c TO BE PROTECTED, 3 1 \ \ �ll k ♦♦_ / a BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER PIPES AND WATER PIPES UNLESS CONDITIONS T MARSHr r. �/ \ \i\. 1 \ y ' SPREADER OUTLET PROP.EARTHEN IE� PREVENT A LATERAL SEPARATION OF 10 FELT,IN WHICH CASE THE CONTRACTOR s (GGRASSES)x / rT x 11 ` VI \\ TL\\a \SB ` n (ppy,7.0) SHALL CONFORM TO NOTE N0.4 BELOW. - �. e\r e • '• 'r t Qrd 1 �� \ \♦J \� /•/ & ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR-35 UNLESS 1 r ,��. n/ r\r "T \\\ \♦ 5lt,_�U \��y xe.B OTHERWISE NOTED. ? 4. WHERE SANITARY SEWERS CROSS WATER SERVICES OR A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET LATERAL SUERAT10N AT �i�-1� ~♦\ \ \ `--- x SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT CROWN OF BE �E SEWER SEWER THE ATT ALLLEASTBE 18 ID AS _ I 9.Og SALT MMSI-r xl '-�-',�. _\ \ R ♦ '� BELOW THE INVERT OF THE WATER PIPE IF THE ELEVATION OF THE SEWER _ /I \ •Fu/♦ ( ) Tll� \ �\ 1 PROP.9LT FENCE CANNOT BE VARIED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WATER PIPE SHALL BE 4 �syg. \ .\ 1 AT LIMIT OF WORK AFPROX.OFF-SITE RELOCATED TO PROVIDE 1W5 SEPARATION OR CONSTRUCTED WITH �' e r r 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE 0 m \ \\ \' - WETLAND BOUNDARY MECHANICAL-JOINT I ONEFULLPIPE LENGTH OF WATER PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED OVER THE z O )L \ `` s♦\` SEWER SO THAT BOTH JOINTS WALL BE AS FAR FROM(THE SENOR AS POSSIBLE Z � n 5-- \ \ CDS WHENEVER IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN VERTICAL SEPARATION AS STIPULATED U 4 : \ \\ �. CDb ABOVE, BOTH THE WATER PIPE AND THE SEWER PIPE SHALL BE ENCASED IN CH.91 WATER DEPECALCU USE ZONE FOLLOWS \ h \\ \ `4\ CONCRETE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET FROM THE CROSSING POINT OF d LiJ N CALCULATED A5 FOLLOWS `COASTAL D' / \\� e " ` "! •♦ Cot3 AVERAGE DISTANCE FROM UNIT TO LANDWARD LOT LIME-243.2' (SANDY) \\ •�gpg /� ♦\) fir\ \ THE OTHER PIPE AS MEASURED NORMALLY FROM ALL POINTS ALONG THE PIPE. uj m WDUZ UNE-0.25 X AVG.DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT LINE- _ /�-,)G. N W Q -BQB'OFFSET MEASURED FROM MHW / I \ r a`• \ �v12A roT _ 5. WATER:FIRE AND SEWER SERVICE SIZES AND LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED BY Z N N S NS / �•y.•• \ ' ,dw""� THE PROJECT MEP ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. LLJ W BEACH- \I� sm 1 Cou ` // �.s'®P B. WATER OR FIRE SERVICE'S WITH LESS THAN 5.OF COVER SHALL BE PROTECTED CL JZ Q Z U (SANDY S BEACH) - AL BEACH \ \ `•� FROM FREEZING N17H INSULATION AND HEAT TRACING. •--N ad(/) O (SANDY BEACH) \ \ / J \ SALT MARSH\ / '�" OJ U H Q F O STORM DRAIN NOTES:_ w I- go I= Ic 1. STOtMWATER CONVEYANCE PIPES SHALL BE PVC(SDR 35)OR PROJECT W Q ;g Q U CIVIL ENGINEER APPROVED EQUIVALENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. In W/ J LLI O 2_ BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95X MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY BY W M Q 3 W CH.91 FACILITY OF PUBLIC AASHTO T-1800 METHOD. L 5 ay -----_---- - \\ \\ ACCOMODANON(FPA) Yr----_ NO \ - CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS 3 SHEETING,IF USED,SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO BACKPHLNG TRENCH. NEW ENCLA O POWER CO. \ FPA LINE-100'OFFSET W UEAN�HIGFI MAF 36J LOT 234 \ MEASURED FROM MHW 4. UNSUITABLE SOIL OI MATERI THE AL ANDI T SHALL BE��REMOVED AND PLACED VT Z WATER(ElEV 4•� \\ �� N SHALL ----- / �--- _----4------ \♦ ��';_ 5. UNSUITABLE MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH THE INFILTRATION FACILITY AND REPLACED WITH CLEAN. GRANULAR FILL MEETING THE ASTM C33 SPECIFICATIONS(CONCRETE SAND). LO �\-` ,wPRox LOCATION a- U aN ' COLLINS COVE •` � \�\�♦ \\\ WIDE GAS EASEMENT PLAN` / (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) (BEVERLY HARBOR) `\\� `\ SCALE:1'-20' Q?F a \ ♦ \\ tea= z 40 C= 0 PROD.f3500.A f I � I ' � I k j � f � . �� 1 . � . �� � a � , � !. I�. PLANT SCHEDULE ��COMMON NAME SCHERIM NAME SM SPACING 0o NOT cur IFmEIt TREE WRAP AWIL HOT BE USED / TREE SNARL BE SET PLUM® B" / RID MAPLE Amr rubrwn 25'Cu. AS SHOWN WAIDBD SAMER SNARL BE RD=7MHCE _-- J�~ � C'' DURING THE FIRST 24 HWIs AFTER PLANTING ---_ GRAY B1RdH Batula popa111dIa B'MC.HT. AS SHOW _ HIVED E MW /OHW OHW DOWNY SERVICFBMRY km shier o,b. 6'MR HT. AS SHOWN t0t � �B TREE SH41 BE PIMED 93 THAI=0 IS 3 INCHES / �9-` ! C.n SHRUBS 1�r Z Z g ABOVE��AID .- �ST_'�COLLINS STREET "' o��. ^, �s a.,y STONE MULCH SHALL BE USED 2/DOWNY SERVICEBERRY ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM Vbumam chotatum 30'HT, AS SHOWN W Z.. B a 2-3 3 SRONE MULCH DIAL NIXON AZNY "t __•IN LIEU OF BARK MIAQf _ _ - \ \ BEACH PLUM Pnmus m�IMTw 30'HT. AS SHOWN - w FROM,BUNK OF TIEFJ -- - •` CP Bd5A1 MN FOR�PECIN.PROrE10lS / _ - �` ___ --9-- 3/IHLAURELY HOLLY 3/MaNTAN LAUREL &DEAF HYDRANGEA HAd'm9Wa manophJllo 30'FIT, AS SHOWN o 3 NCH HIGH DON WOW WO R AROUND TREE PR APPR GAS MAIN 1/MCURTAIN LAUIREL 2/INKBERRY HOLLY 110 ar A RAIL BW1(,p a BfWA BETDFE B/AaXUNC. - y� `�. \ •5� COMMON NINEBARK Vaccbrum caTmhwwn 30 HT. AS SHOWN CCNRETELY REMOVE SMIET1C BU"d LACK ___ ELDERBERRY Sambuare CatadenaHe 30'HT. AS SHOWN V C LO PAYED DEWALK ' PROP.BEARF�ItY� NORTHEtBN BAYBERRY YArfca ps'IsLHwRka 30'HT. AS SHOWN o s INCHES .- k PBiC TICKS® MOUNTAIN LAUREL Kllmic AUIdW 3D'FR. AS SiONN V.; m BELOW I RDOTBML MU BE KAM ON .....• '1+ _ •• 1,AWBERRY HOLLY INKBERRY HOLLY BAY 0ahr6 30•HT. AS SHOWN •r w tAmaTLxem s,emr % \ \ PERENNIALS,GRWNDCOVERS AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES �y z N o a S 3 x IIOBBML IYNffIFR PROP.BUILDING MOUNTED \', 1/MgRNTAN LAUREL \ / SMITCHGRASS Poikum ftatum /1 18•24'O.C. D W LIGHT(IMP.OF 8) 2/LONBUSH BLUMERRY PINK ICKSLFD rosin r 16•-24. Br � _TREE PLANTING I�\iHERN BAi'BERRY / BEAIRBERRY ArCtNf*yos aw-mEL j r hB•-ze o.G NOTT TO sXE 1/MQUNTAN LAIRtEL• PROPOSED 3 STQRY BUILDING k / £ r -_ __ (FOOTPRINT�i�SF) I/HNKeE>oLY HOLLv&� PLANTING NOTES RUSE AND ffcPlANf RAY SHR1B5 WNDx sETRE -IW BUFFER ZONE TO R$� I/GRAY BIRCH \ / - MORE THIN 2 NUNS AFTER ISS WHIC s WITTING N 9 TOP OF COASTAL BANK i 100-YeAR R�O6�QTIZ=10.0 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL PLANTS AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LL •� PLUMBSHIM SKU or SET ,/ELDERBERRY / QUANTITY OF SHRUBS AND TREES GRAPHICALLY SHOWN ON PLANS IF TH M 15 A jigs E WVER erer FlnaONs Twltt N PEsr Two Itwa+s f 3 EAST \\ / 1/6EAfH PLUM DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANT UST QUARTO AND CRMWCS THE GRAPHIC SAL TAKE 8�; / - ,/COMMON NREBARK S STREET \ too- k PRECEDENCE svm m SIONIQ ONS NARHI7➢1 As RED // 2/ARROWtlOD NBUNUM H?ITRAN CE MAINl� YtEA-MAP 34B1.748t LOT 277 SF. ! UGE 2 PRIOR TO THE START OF EXCAVATION FOR THE PROJECT BOTH ON AND OF THE SITE, BYO' CMMOUE TO REQUIRED DEPTH SHRUB SHALL BE RANTED SO TIMT CRW'N i-/ 1 F,.. / • �'�\ z THE CONTRACTOR STALL NOTIFY gCSAFE AND FRONDED A gGSAFE NUMBER AID ommu NIH PNHitli(i IDI IS 2 INCH MN AWE FINISHED91ADE NTEA mu- / '�•.••`•.: : \ 1/tiED MAPLE' -' \� } INDICATING THAT STN U G nIIIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED AND MARKED. 2-3 In DEPTH STONE MULCH(PIx1 i c �\ 3. CIXNUNACTOR SHALL BEdN 90 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD OWEDIATELY UPON PLAHTCG AWAY FROM BASE OF SHRUB) 1 �-B� AId1 WILL CONTINUE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. BAMLL.MIX PER SPECIAL PROMSIONB _ I ::` �� • .' -PROP.SWITCHGRASS ` I GAS EASEMENT AROUNDINHPhil EARTH WATERING SAUCER ..i='HIP ( , PROP.ORASS PAVERS Hai / (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) CONTRACTORAND SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FTt01A BIAIDNC FOUNDATIONS EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS '. / ... ............... \ PROP.PUBLIC A YCCESS 5. MAXIMUM SLOPE WHIR DISTURBED AREAS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2:1,UNLESS OTHERWISE n NOTED. _ COYREIFI3'PEY04E 5'NITERC B11RW ND / TO SHORELINE z i3 t5om F PRIOR �RUNTS,REMOVE B PROP.UYM AREA \ 6. PLANTS SHALL BEAR THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISH GRADE AS TO ORIGINAL m m BIT.CONC, k. GRADES BEFORE gUMNC ED qq BELOW -�'-,� UUDSTUFM SUBGRADE /� ! 6 / PAVEMENT \ B O RDOTBUL LD0.F OR CRACKED ROmBMLS WILL NOT IX 7. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY'THE 8 3 x ROmRXL ACCOM FOR PLIMTNG PROP.POLE MOUNTED - AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK.PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF LIGHT MP.OF 2) �'r`.�°: // .PROP.STORMWATER MEADOW AREA NURSERYMEN.SUDSTLIUMNS FOR APPROVED EQUIVALENT PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE MADE � - t - / / ..:.-.:. A r-•(, ��, (SEED MIX AS SPEGFFD HEREON) IN CONSULTATION WITH THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHRUB PLANTING s ;,:r=:' N ;1' a PUNTS TO BE BALLED INBURUP OR CONTAINERIZED. NOT ED scut ,SIT. •B .: 7';.;. ...... _yA�7 „,,.:�' \ 9.MULCH FOR PLANTED AREAS TO BE AGED PINE BARK:PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED,DARK E)MOXIE TO REOMRLD DEPIH \ g- -L'�' •';,t^ ":. ,c ai.::�:.1", ri &tOWN IN COLOR AND FREE OF WOOD CHIPS MIdCER MAN 1/4 INLH. °I' NB B1CIOU WITH PIANRNG YIX r' r �8+rw -,, � ',1.. :':'1 RAGE AND REPI/lTf ANY SHRUBS MIXri SETTLE MORE ' r i_- ------ _ = "; �', .. T , \ 10.PLANTING SOL MIX:LOAM THOROUGHLY VXXWORAIID WITH ROTTED MANURE y THAN 2 BIGHTS INTER PLANTING ND WWTDWD N � / _ s�+•� - � _� . �- ��� }"� p yTTtsc PROPORTIONED 5 C.Y.TO 1 C.Y.OR EQUIVALENT. USE OF PEAT MOSS IS PROHIBITED. z HATER BY ROODNG 1WiCE N FIRST TWO ROUIb / i i/ �-�r ins- - �/lT >> •` ;\ / T 11.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE PLANT MATERIALS FOR ONE 1 FULL 0 *0 PIANTNG. TIER @ NVNDN AS PER - i J/9 �/LAH3 r r. e a e . \ \\ t/\ \ %5,h.:.•'�v. / () - y �i ~ ; \ .':-F' .• `•. • YEAR FROM DALE OF ACCEPTANCE. m SA1DYm SPF.CBTGODFB m e z . ,a^ -�\1 TOP OF OWISUA . �/ •''.1J.�.,rs.:':.:s I sPuxD19NL5 e \ �.•.V'..• .•:ab -'`�I'a- / \ BANK \\�\ _\.. .�:l 12 AREAS OF THE SITE WHICH HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND NOT OTHERWISE DEVELOPED cRowa of RANr TO 2 NOES I®L/DOG? / W H= sE RAINS qt NO1F5 FLASHED GPADE AFRR SE111RD _' W e �� r �\ _ F.\ -` A/� a- SHALL BE LGAMED WITH TOPSOB_TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6•,AND SEEDED WITH A SFID i F� �"�`-"`� / /\4 1 \ �� .,y�t.�:•:::'1, - MIX APPROVED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE DESIGNER. i m 2-3 NOT DEPTH SITNE MULCH(PULL �' - AWAY FROM BLS OF SHRUB) e " •\ 1 \ •'=' �';. F i ��\I \ ..T..\ 13.OTHERWISE AUTOMATIC IT DESGN PLAITS FOR PRODUCTS AND URE AREAS UNLESS _ _ SALT MARSH r r '1/ W \ \ W} ` \ \ \ . ';v`:'..�: OTHERWISE NOTED. SUBMIT DESN,T!PLANS AND PRODUCT LIIERAIURE PER 71E HIGH J \ SPECIFICATIONS. NIYRD RANTING BFD 1B��� � 4�)r� \\ \\'9 \ 4�^'..:`.. / 6 •.I I•. ,I I...• I } 5 \ (mil 14.NO PLANTING SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ACCEPTANCE OF ROUGH GRAVING. I I ) -flMxDeiuNPmsRTxIREDmCes }� k J� c) � r \� ` \. �� \\ � \\ \\ ` r z - _ /! syeT � 15.PUW15 7D�THOROUGHLY WhTEflED AFTER INSTALLATION,AT LEAST TWICE 1ITFCN FF'PLW BUE OFROM OONIAINER ONT SCORE SIDES CONC.W .'y �` / 1 t\�� \ 1 \ r 4 Y- ME FIRST 24 HOURS. uD IXntaH of Poor BYL TO LaasLN -'T-,� r P0075 � u � � -AT �_•�*�\ �y�`^\\ m \\`- '� i' 16.THE VEGETATED INFILTRATION BASH SHALL NOT BE MOWED REGULARLY. AT MOST R L \\ \ _ SHOULD BE MOWED TWICE ANNUALLY,ONCE C THE SUMMER AND ONCE IN THE FALL, UNDISTURBED SIBBYDE J -6 ` SM29 r -•-•�?�,l" 4 ��� ( ) e\� \\ FOR SOIL STABILIZATION IT IS WDRTANT THAT VIGOROUS VEGETATIVE GROWTH OCCURS C / LL 4 APPROX.OFF-SITE THIS MFA AND THAT ANY SOIL EROSION IS REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. PERENNIAL PLANTING ---- t�1 e �`\ \\ - - WE�B�ARY Z o NOT TO SCALE �� / /- ♦ \� AHOY\ \ N6_ \ F `'r » \ \ ` STORMWATER MEADOW SEED MIX CH.91 WATER DEPENDENT ALCU USE ZONE FOLLOWS -- \ •\ '�'� \ \\ �3 �� _ FROM PCElANDS NURSERY k SUPPLY OR a LWJ (n m Z CALCULATED LOT LI FOLLOWS C is DUIH \ h\ \` " " APPROVED EQUIVALENT W AVERAGE DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT LINE=243.Y (SANO'Q / e 6 \1 a \ WDUZ LINE-0.25 X AVG.DISTANCE FROM MHW TO LANDWARD LOT LINE ��C. //J// \ ! SMTt \ I \ Z En c W OFFSET MEASURED FROM MHW --- ///�" /�� / \ �912A BIOSWALE MIX(60R OF MI'A Z V7 N V7 =FW iT-' �� J/ /� \�XmL� e`\ \ J\ �,,,,�✓ ••.,� Bdurtllk Awn Cbmmen Nun MYIx �' LMJ N �_ �\l ,/• COASFAL BEACH \\ \}e 4 COASTAL BEACH L W72 ,� /J _ ��• scft n Ey-n�A::0D Icus CBI--VVId isM ;4 CLz "Q ZU CDz / (SA Y _)_ _ SANDY \ \ Vemmmm,wmrarawe INexYakbdnweA Cox DM _J ndy Bp / \ SALT MARSH\ /• HeleNun Bp"nwa cannon 6nereaeee Tx o.oe J V 3 a F Z / I \( ) \ / rk epvm Oenae Bl R Smr 6% 046 Parhm,MryMun Seteei9�a 6% 0.12 J g / ,/ ,J \ \ J Verbsia leomle Blue Verveln 6% 0.12 J TA7 ELL<WRf 0 Q / / \ Eup.lWuaun NrpA Jo"" 6% 0.72 / /t Stlrpw aeoA4 Green BwusA s% 0.. Q W W 3¢ Pwlemmdgi Fo:0aa B-d gie 4% 0.05 LIJ Pr3 Q > J _ J iIn PY---D nm MNmaman Mu.nm,Alm 4% a m �. W CH.91 FACILITY OF PUBLIC RuaE .mna Bea-Iyad Evan 4% ail I 5 ---------_--- \\ \\ ACCOMODATION(FPA) swvhv mamne _r G_ 4% 0.67 W `A CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS Labs NPJEumyobfchm �eB On rmeoa a% am r_ 3 FPA UNE=1W OFFSET Mavme,Mwom v.Ia BerP.nux s% om (n LLI Z MEASURED FROM MHW r---�-�WGH WATER \ `\\ HelfopMeHdWlntlm E inift ear 2% ae2 ---- -�SE7.EV.A3 -� \ In.,�arrmlar Bbvmaw tx tts MARITIME GRASSLAND MIX(40%OF MIXI of MIk �' -3---___ //�J�G SC p ii-n eo Pe Am ia.ftrI-knak G a Is 3.36 r ____------�'- -- ----------- - Pemr„nemvmn NwP.�G,ne s% 2.ra l+,l i APPROX LOCATION 10' COLLINS COVE - \\ `\ \\\ SCALE PLAN 20' M,d'nP W9 ' B9Bbreinn t2% ate Q I \ EWWsnM marNNltlla FlM-Top Bopanmtl 996 a.05 WIDE GAS EASEMENT \\ ` \ E�ayde 6HNlnb Vft. a a r B% 0.19 V / (PL BK 447 PLAN 77) (BEVERLY HARBOR) \\ \\ o ID zo 4O am"a._pce seee�e.Goin al 7% uz f,n / J \\ \ f3ymm MfyN6N VirpWe Wla Rye FPR 8.a6 a Z / \\ \ Aetleply eynem Cannon MID.-I 5% 1.76 Z P k-N'ge &Ming 5% 0.42 i Sag,v rv�Gne InCian Gmaa 3% a.0 < C PROU.J35M A \ M fill VWP N �ums4o n oEx o bvhbNs VOLTAIRE ARCHITECTURAL WALL PACK vwp VOLTA I RE ARCH ITECTURAL WALL PACK vwp -OIM �-_�`. F.�OcEt$9{EP att?tf U y i r�'• _.�_— "� \\ ��-p \\\ �..1 1 r 'Y'4 yt�y AAA Y� `� EFANEFS ..rw w.y'�•� wm�—mow }.n..n W OHw ONW Ir1 1J Z 2 gJ� oSTd C(�LLD�iS apST ,EE Al° ° d ° 4p do_ 40 4, Qo� o m f;'e —c o c�_o �� d dp dp Qp �0 � o c-dp---q, c c v aiaaatcaE9uAtulws '.�- ..a.,.,.® s--Rm"""'" d p � - y ao _ �y Q -E 9 \moo qo 1521LED OMEGA SERIES ® •L� :� N d v= ®7 =wn®S E - d: u a'9•R5i7`w o.rar+wrµ •+ww.w e. / .O •, ° . Q QO m ion Yr _ °'"'"'"'°"�,�,� "'"'"` .�.-CL:d"' W' ••,•' d,° a° d, d o ceoe�wccxwaeia-ealimnm4ora+«om-mxaeicay.mn.mcwlcr % MH:12 da o 0 o .+.r.�. d d d MH:12 d d dp PROPOSED 3- -BUILD] 0 ' O °s� QO •O _ •� — (FOOTPRINT AREA=4a860 SF) d 41 do 40 ,e,,..,.- g! a �' d FIRS�FLOOR-11.5 m�..�w� `�...-.........� 0 8 10D-YEAR FLOOD EIFfAT1Q 10.0 4) �o Qo o ..... � ,,.®..wow SpedfimtIons g ° d i �� nm" ,srr".m,emr Yw�sw:rwe..✓wns �,vrroo .. ri.'°a..>o,•r,.s,-, a .ar.r,�......� ..r,.-,r Qo/ o•o .� •B MH:}2 \ d .p .�, — ».�.... ..,.aw m.Ya":.a°."'.a'� ...r .�..r.,.... � d; �, ° sw.F4e. ®� •rer�wmeas�e"a.QY..a ,.mv ..., r wY. el 40 4, 4, v ) i \ d db awa€t4 •.F .obtl :.w.rtm m d 4 •`b° ,,,,, .m #4S�EkM�4s1 �,..,��..`e�" 4vwp VOLTAIRE ARCHITECTURAL WALL PACKp NH.' 2 ' \ d,� d 4 ww+� 'saom_ """ rm•�.-'. °Ywew.s"ed nm-i"b°u-r m ..L10; d) �� .4 •, o d mmn,rwiTrw .T4 ;M.'a SPEEmG1TNINE °° 4p b ® ® O d d 4 Qa•-v+vraw nwr.r. � � O N pw.an..uw ��so-�.a�rr.r�isoavoti~:.mOO�i« t �m V, o f d - o di p i i o� � p .p ��r y:r��• PEMO9M�NCEMT 4o Q, i i ; o d� 40 •"`» m w.�... .. S a ,' S da 3 ) :mw+s�oawc�wa-�i'� co R Ym ti do 4i °> oe d 6 41 L° 7 3 4 0 Q° Sternberg Lighting M• e� .„.,a..,.Y �_ d d _•� 6: d d d °b Q dD/.4o d-•--'�''�—'+q�— k_� o ?5��% �� a dD d oO d� -1521LED OMEGA SERIES ® S ig °* �.`.d d •p -° '° W pd ;:°""d`w.w 4° °' 0,4•r� br r 'P Y ,: e •h Y zL.� `O d 4° 4p Q° upOC�..r°p`.wYa"u r..�Y..�1°"n.r°ptla1wa. FWW— z g Qo 20 Y r°oY Y 4® eo o ° 4 40. r4� Y 46 r iQp Y (�`� Y 'y -��I\4p '� QO •O •O `-- - I eS 1 r � r Y e r r r � Y " ,: r� t �� •M+Mn�aeway..�waia ��� 1�. I"---'a G � � �nw--.arwbtar p ��Y 62aE4R I9aFUF 151aID5MR Y { ", ./ Y c t t Y rl I t rt+M Mv�Mmen HmWm ) V P U '..°,a.a ............... .. .�,,.r...,.. ..�..m.., / ` '�� r Y r Y r. ,: l •\4s � \ �.:....Y..r.>. Dwions — // rr _ lfl Luminelra LdaU Summary .L �W L—No L6e/e X Y 2 odent r81 r k r °a Z CL 1 W3 5075.375 5370 12 44.048 0 Y r " Y ¢'�� ��+ �-° 0— Q 8 F O O a(n a Z 2 W3 5102.875 5354,25 12 44.048 0 / . PdC�warre.v. J U ¢ U O 3 W3 5041.875 5350 12 13a803 0 F 4 W3 5111.25 =2 12 313.985 0 "-°a'v Lu Q U -5 W3 5025.375 5316.5 12 273.72 0 6 w3 5f08.5 6314,875 12 3fa985 0 1521LED OMEGA SERIES W P7 ¢ L� ® ] cn W 7 W3 5077.375 5298.75 12 313.985 0 _ W ad 8 W3 5049.125 5291125 12 22a72 0 Performance 18ased on FIGLem) 8 SB3 5149.625 528225 20 132138 0 z 10 ISS3 151la25 5248.625 20 f32138 0 _ SternbergLighting ��M.�.a�n _ .�• u., - Ceku/a6on Summary Labe/ Cak7ype Unitr Avg Alas Min AvpWin MartlMfn ,.a..ua _ CwcPfa 1 IYiaNnaace At 0.68 5.4 ao NA NA waa+ •_ra-• -:x ® N OUMoorLum/nehe Scbedule ma-.ow r L Z J symad etey Label Deser/p— Arm cum.Lanerrs err Rlename PLAN .! 2 SB3 1521LEQ18L4073-AIDL018SVf-BLOC 1.6 6905 O.9W 762iCE6 f�40Ta-MD[A}SSVf-BLOC.IES , - .' - _ r'1.•, _ SCALE:1'-21Y i 0 8 W3 I VWPV4.30-73673---S0GL-0IM-UNV 0 2. 1 awe VWPV430.73o-r.,m.SDOL-0IM-UW.IE _ Y� a:r•: 0 t' 0 10 20 40 PRO&/35DOA i i � � : I r �, 1 � � . � a ! � I . �! a .I ;+ EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT (WHEN REO'O) CATCH BASIN GRATE �INDWdBAGREMOVAL H BASIN GRATE CATCH BASIN SILT SACKT SACK VAFO r X 2•WOODEN STAKE �i STAKE ON 10' I 4PA-EN 'CEMENT CONCRETE(6• BUILDING FACE OR Ot �ay µ _fi :;- LINEAL SPACING CK IN VEHICULAR AREAS) -« / FIXED OBJECT z FI_TR75!SILT SOXX(12'-18' + , ^' $ s EXPANSION '; TYPICAL)OR EQUAL ty. UPSLOPE r FINISHW.W.MESH CONCRETE EXPANSIONON"IT W :; w RESTRAINT 1'REPAR FOR WORK AREA AREA TO BE PROTECTED '.+::t < SIDEWALK i _ WATER FLOW— DOIMISLOPE n _ o SECTION �N WORK AREA " AREA TD BE IIII I I I U 3 STAI@ ON 10' W_ PROTECTED LINEAL SPACING — 1 -�- w o 1. IN NOTES: o c 1. INSTALL SILT SACKS H EXISTING CATCH BASINS INSTALL SILT SACKS IN = I III r NEW CATCH BASINS AFTER INSTALLATION. 2 GRATES TO BE PLACED OVER SILT SACKS. 1. PROVIDE EXPANSON JOINTS AT MIN.30 FT. FILTREXX SILTSOXX SECTNIN O.C.WITH PRE-MOLDED JOINT FILLER. 8 3. SILTSACK SHALL BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY AND AFTER ALL STORM J FILTREXX SILTSOXX PLAN NEW z Z EVENTS AND CLEANING OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE PERFORMED WHEN 8'COMPACTED GRAVEL Q z 0 8 DEPTH OF SEDIMENT IS WITHIN 6'OF GRATE MULCH SOCK m 2. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AR W O.C. .Q (N.T.S.) CEMENT CONCRETE• 3. PROVIDE BROOM FINISH IN DIRECTION Z d SILT SACK SEDIMENT TRAP (300°�" 1) PERPENDICULAR TD CURB. ° NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4. CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE 4.000 NOT TO SCALE PSI-TYPE II. T M SETTS y l OV BERM OR SWALE AS NEEDED -� F TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM 4 LB •U• J JJ DISCHARGING FROM THE SITE CHANNEL (GALVANIZED) 1• i /4• f pys y TREATMENT VARIES / a 8'OF 2'-4" E 'D� VERTICAL GRANITE CURB m m < AGGREGATE COARSE 3 I/4• TACK COAT .::}C ::•. �" a 5 ad / BIT.CONCRETE PAVEMENT :•::f::ti•:: POST SECTION / , •q� - - - N.T.S. 12, 70P COURSE(1 MIN.) WALL KI m SIDEWALK ----SIGN SLOPE VARIES>> (MIN.) c a L � < OR FlN. DETECTABLE HEAVY DUN GNADE —I I=I III SEE NOTE 9 LEOTENTILE FABRIC -NUT AND WARM PAD �'LIP(MAX.) LOCK WASHER ,I —_ fRUENOFF MTNN 16' SEE Sim 5 ICI MACHNE `AN IIII _ CURB TRAN9110N L z SETTLEMENT BASIN m — DETAILS s IVW DR BOLT ACCESSIBLE C,L�CND NOTES: y PLAN{ PROFILE _ (WOO PSI-TYPE 1) o CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR: VAN ACCESSIBLE —III I III COMPACTED GRAVEL 1, THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMP CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE o SPACES ONLY BASE 1.5%(1%MIN.). 1. STONE FOR STABILIZATION STABILIZED LIZED ENTRANCE ENTRANCE SHALL BE 2-4'STONE c 2 THE LENGTH OF THE STAIILIIED ENTRANCE SHALL NOT BE LESS LIMN b FEET. Em PARTIAL ELEVA710N COMPACTED SUBGRADE 2 7 AMAXIMUM S ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCLUDING CURB RAMPS a THE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE NO LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE INGRESS OR EGRESS DRIVE,OR 16 FEET, 6• 6• lf:k 3. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CURB RAMPS SHALL BE WHICHEVER IS GREATER. (MIN.) 7.5% 4. GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR M PLACING STONE 5. ALL SURFACE WATER THAT IS FLOWING TO OR DIVERTED TOWARDS THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE PIPED BENEATH 4. A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ANY PERMANENT OBSTACLE THE ENTRANCE IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL.A BERM WITH MAXMUM 1 TO 5 SLOPES THAT CAN BE CROSSED BY VEHICLES IN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE(LE,HYDRANTS,UTILITY POLES,TREE WELLS.SIGNS.ETC.) z CAN BE SUBSTITUTED. 5. CURB TREATMENT VARIES,SEE PLANS FOR CURB TYPE 6. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WALL PREVENT TRACIONG OR FLOWING,OF SEDIMENT ONTO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SIGN VERTICAL GRANITE CURB (VGC) 6. BASE OF RAMP SHALL BE GRADED TO PREVENT PONDINR RIGHTS OF WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOPDRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 7. SEE TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION FOR RAMP CONSTRUCTION. AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. SEDIMENT SPLLED,WASHED OR-TRACKED O1T0 THE 8. WHERE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE LESS THAN 5'IN WIDTH(EXCLUDING CURBING)A 5' RIGHT OF WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. r 5'PASSING AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 200 FEET. 9. EUMINATE ALL CURBING AT RAMP(OTHER THAN VERTICAL CURBING,WHICH SHALL BE SET FLUSH)WHERE IT ABUTS ROADWAY. (n ZO STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL Z NOT TD SCALE ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (ACR) NOT TO SCALE CL W (n J Z I,RE — Zco -y i`� 4•WHITE STRIPING r-6' 3'-s• Z S U w LLJ LJJ- - O.C.AT 45'IN LOAON; Q,•J 'P'N 6 Z U AREA U z a F z PAINTED a CJ F 4•WHITE STRIPE(TIP.) 4•WHITE STRIPE(TYP.) P °d Bs SYMBOL1}•BITUMINOUS LLI�<WHITE En W Q 0 z `� SURFACE COURSE LMJ o'✓o I 2•BITUMINOUS Q+M v< ED O Llj 2a'(TIP..UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)) a BINDER COURSE 5 NATIONAL STANDARD ACCESSIBILITY SY B OL '+ b 8'COMPACTED GRAVEL L3 PANTED ON PAVEMENT an BASE COURSE rn Z b A TYPES of PAINT SION I I11-I Ill-III -I III- 'l 1. OIL/WATFR BASED P',6 COMPACTED SUBCRADE 136 PER LINEAR FOOT NOTE 2. THERMOPLASTIC 18-0 (TYP.) (REMOVE ANY ILLICIT REPLACE FILL PAVEMENT SECTION MATERIAL AND REPLACE Z 17'-19'(TYP.) ^ NOTE V PAVEMENT MAX SLOPE 2%IN NOT TO SCALE WITH 95%COMPACTED FILL) F_ VARIES PER PLAN II �'1S0 PER LINEAR FOOT ALL DIRECTIONS 1. PARALLEL SPACES SHALL BE 8'X 22'. 3. 3N REFLECRVE V� V ;3.00PER LINEAR FOOT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE NOT NATIONAL STANDARD ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL W o PARKING SPACE STRIPING E THESE PRICES ARE NOT To SCALE Z in ONLY NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE V a PRO,./350RA �� - .I I I �� �i - � - I 1 I � . I 1 �� I�1 � . �I� I i� !.. .. _ CROSS COUNTRY UNDER PAVEMENT COMPACTED O 4'LOAM&SEED ROADWAY SURFACE ' Z CURB BOX SHALL BE CONTROL GATE VALVE I SET TO GRADE AND BOX TNIENT VAWES) W a o FINISH ( PERENNIAL RYEGRASS(40%) T. PAVEMENT SECTION EXIST.GRADE-FINISH GRADE 1REA GRASS SEED MIX `fir• w SEE DETAIL a ____ - PAVEMENT Q ROLL GRASS ROAD f%REWIN(S FESCUE(301n •:R;;�. �p G A PAVER(OR EWAL) KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS(30V STRUCTURAL BACKFlLL COMPACTED V rc 3 TO 95%IN 12'MAX.LIFTS TYPE A3 CURB PLANTING MIX TO FINISH GRADE c ( ) N BOX EXISTING WATER ICON -SANDY LOAM PLANTING MIX FILL LEVELED I w F # (TYPE AND SIZE TO BE INSIDE PAVER GRIDWORK AFTER HEAVY .CURB VIBAIED M FlE1D) -I.:' WATER DOWN.SAND CUSHION(TYPE At) COLORATION SfOP1 _ •�•r•) y� `� N PIPE STOP L` SLEEVE TAPPING V�6 � Y 9'MIN.(EACH SIDE) - � O TV: w IS E%IS7 GRANULAR FILL PASSING 1/Y AND WATER Y FLEXIBLE S x" n SICKING 1 MAIN P'�H :. 22 RETAINED ON N0.4 SIEVE(TYPE A2) COPPETi SERVICE ;_ AS REWIRED (SEE NOTE) b 67 E�>TO BUILDING T R EARTH9N. NOTES; 1. EXISTING WATER SERVICE SHALL BE SHUT OFF AT EXISTING CURB STOP AND e n SERVICE LINE CUT AND CAPPED JUST BEYOND CURB STOP. 4'CIDI PIPE 4 f= —3 ° USE TYPE SI SUBSOIL FOR -1 I I=I I f=11=1 I m—I I I—III au N REMOVE AND REPLACE OF 2 TAP EXISTING WATER MAIN WITH NEW CORPORATION STOP AND INSTALL NEW UNSUITABLE SOIL MATERIALS NOTE USE SAND BEDDING FOR CURB STOP AND CURB BOX WITHIN EXISTING SIDEWALK CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS SEIM EW S MIN.OR WATER.FIRE AND GAS SERVICE COMPACT SUBKRADE D+2•WHICHEVER INSTALLATION. a SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK TO MINIMIZE REPAIRS REPLACE IS GREATER ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO MATCH EXISTING NOTES ELEVATIONS 1.INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE RENEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL WATER SERVICE CORPORATION TAPPING SLEEVE & GATE VALVE DETAIL NDS EZ ROLL GRASS PAVERS EAW(FIRE LOAD EQUAL)-9 (NOT TO SCALE) NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE (Nor TO sraRE) EARTHEN > Y �qq Z t0 m mR Q [� O s � o � z is - oaf F PATH INV-5.90 LEVEL w FLOW� RP-RAP INLET RIP-RAP CURET LLAD0 m a PROTECTION PROTECTION ELEV=7.0 not, o z ILDING .�c7 y TWO 8'HOPE PIPES(S-1.0%) DRAIN ( :::�:.. INFILTRATION BASIN ...: z 'klk j SEGMENT FOREBAY VEGETATED INFILTRATION..�.. .\ ....... ...: .♦ ,` ��/ i, BOTTOM ELEV.__6.50 i BOTTOM OF BASIN=6.50 INV=7.OD ..:� THIS PORTION BY WT z PLUM&NG ENGINEER (SCREW TYPE "::'i:r ::r:::r:c:c:i(iiiC{ii:1::c::r:i?i??.:ir:::v::.; ,• //` i'i 'ir:ii ii.::: :: CAP) \ .. ,., .. , , ,:, �•, ,,:.: :.�:;:. , /.. _//-.:./\. /..:�.\ , PROPERTY L94E ASEMENT NATIVE SOR 8'LOAM AND SEED Fl00R SEDIMENT FOREBAY & �o MIX AO SEED SPECIFI WITH z ROADWAY i'TO v >>> > >e< e VEGETATED INFILTRATION BASIN ON �L-1 f� o 3-0' NOT TD SCALE Z � $ FOAM IN TION UNDER 4'COVER vas ���yyJJ Q BIT.GONG z Cn �+fn = 6 PAYDAENT W c W EXISTING SEWER Z PROP.SEDIMENT FOREBAY Va Q g w 6'PVC(SI)R35)SERVICE END PROP.CAPE COD 6ERM 0 OU y Q O e e T 2 FROP.8'HOPE DRAIN PIPES ~ g�F PVC ADAPTER G .,8..._ r-__ �7 -. .' .... 7 .7 d� �I V..=-O)(INV.OUT-6.9) \ W¢ mf 6 U WITH FLEXIBLE JOINT y.. �� C a s.60. q ..`,yp_� Q W `dd w O LAJ cm PROP.VEGETATED !! N Z INFILTRATION BASIN, TYPICAL BUILDING SEWER SERVICE BELOW SLAB �`-' 4 PROP.EARTHEN LEVEL NOT TO SCALE SPREADER OUTLET (ELEV.7.0) Z F= j J U SCALE - z LLJ O� U PROD.(35OD.A i �� ii ii ,: � _ �M �� . ,, 13 ,f I I yl l . �,f •,ors `-is` 'I r• ,f. :�'' - — - - •s. > - _ ti+ / �i�l.{,�.x�y� �fi .. '•nr f r�� ��'e` 1 + r, .k"x�� .� .... - 'sue .--` - • -'Sri � a�'• I '.X i F. •�• �1 ► ■ s :I :;�,�F r'``. F` A!� •�� wr` ~'„ 'fit � - .�'4`r �' f!• �����p,[ ir •�- Rho ' N� _�i� - 1-� '-. ZO 1 �,{' ' �� -- •.f .1 �:-�pr'•3��i:.'y_.�r�'4���,• ..� .,_.w'� �'i�.�T:.:e'�r F' ��,�1i• f.. - '� �`�� ar ,s' .1� - �•. _ � All - IF ;f�• - ,r. ,*=ram - 9 •'[Y jF-.• k- 3 e f '•r-' 5r.. r� . 1.: •4• ,,,,rr e�� .�F�:l�Y�TSei••_ •`�',-3 Lti �•1l _ •-�A�T �' - , +� �;g�'o-�',""�J'-� �i' ',��' - - ,fir r• !� yk•S�� J.1'a 4:_ `�'� �� ..'.; ';j, •f" ''3: y�.Is� ��z y� ��• �:�r���',�''r '�(." ^Yak;` �.T � �:�� l! $� 41 Aw .� ZO f _ .:�!�:- � 1'�[:'i'_'--'•S_ -fir' '*ry _av LLI LLJ ;• '^��' - •_� :: .k,tea':: a- •ti 'y ..' ,may •fy - _ LLI � LLJ LLI 14 r- tir � �• ,r':,. #err Stir � .. .'�,�, -:�� it .i - f� ;� �iY�. _.r•.-� �r� i � _ i I _ . ,a �� �i . 1 �: �L, DN DN RED BARN ARCHITECTURE •a• 84 High SVaet Ipswich,MA 01938 •bge°p�y9 978.5966764 UP P.) Nam. DN New En9M�k lhveblxne^I 5TAIR#2 `c'q D. dpben 106 e�gePea�o•$�'! �f4p'. Fmwa9wJPddEon VINYL DN — - — - -- " + MECh.RM Scab: AW.15,P Dab: Au9ut15,1019 2 Dravm by: FMc VINYL Ch.cbtl by:RW V COOLER tl KITCFIEN � of ELEV. rn F�!/ cc ®I TILE 1O7 JENNIFER'S O PREP SINK ICJ Y S IIS � c o I- o _ � tl WAP.EWA5NING FREEZER V 77 � F1ALL � VINYL /f a MEWS MECNNTILITY EXECUTIVE OFFICE SERVING STATION 108 116 TILE TILE CARPET q— 06 DINING/MEETING ROOM WOMEN5 STAFF TOILET ROOM Q 102 104 VINYL TILE TILE }F co ❑� PATIENT INTAKE 4— O� 117 w VINYL ca RECEPTION A� m w / (D c¢ VINYL PATIENT INTAKE O C) Vmm uou 118 1 0 WObj VINYL U cu up NW ADMIN OFFICES 9 PRINTER 5TATION PRINTER.5TATION � ENTRY CARPET A, W VINYL Z STAIR los VINYL 4 4. 1. It u 4 1. :�`• t-,Xj .1 .) J v d d v J .1 d d •e. ,a • oeen e. f�1 DN s'a A. PROPOSED FIR5T FLOOR PLAN ' T'ROPOSFDFlRST Lf scALE: lia = r-a 1 i � l t 1 �� � _ f , 1 _ 1 , � . .i I I+ � �� I I II ,� i t 01 RED BARN ARCHITECTURE &I High Street Ipswich,MA 01938 978.595.8784 LIP Project N.— t Engbd Om V— STAIR#2 pwcrlPOeh 209 RmrntioNM6Em VINYL Dote: /.ugup 15,2019 DN Drawe by: R9r Ch—e by:RAk \ / JANITOR \/ v / \ TILE N 7 4 ELEV. PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM 2Io 217 m _ z°I VINYL ` S VINYL e 9 C O n e u S � D 3 HALL I TOILET ROOM z13 a 21 I VINYL TILE PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM BATHROOM PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM IM TIIP v VINYL I MEDS ROOM VINYL 06 I 1 212 TILE O i� _ I � HALL L 2 1J�LJ� PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM VINYL L 203 PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM •••'• / 19 �✓�` y 2 VINYL VINYL O C.) V E 0L3 0 �m U � � COMMONROOM zla UP DN VINYL w PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM I ----- PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM A` I 220 VINYL - WOFFICE 1 VINYL Z 21s STORAGE �/�\\CARPET 211 STAR STA #I \Y' 1 I VINYL z°s I I VINYL a PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-O' A-1 .2 i i 17. i is IN RED BARN ARCHITECTURE 84 High Strad Ipawlch,NIA 01938 978.595.6764 Pralwt Name Now En�ud OaebPnent STAIR#2 peaafipNuO 309 RenmauaNAdiGon VINYL Smk: f/C=f-7 Dale: AWp 15.MA DN D—by: RW Chwl—I by: RW \ / JANITOR \/ v TILE � I ELEV. PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM 310 3l7 a a 301 VINYL S a` wnm 0 o _ 'm e > ,x lE o MALL - TOILET ROOM F 313 a 311 VINYL TILE PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM 15ATMROOM PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM 1; 302 318 306 v VINYL TILE MEDS ROOM VINYL 06 I 312 I TILE O 1 o c MALL PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM vlwvL 303 PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM VINYL Y� o VINY O U U E _ U v UO� 0 1N O cu COMMONROOM 314 DN VINYL w PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM 304 J r PATIENT SLEEPING ROOM /^��` 32o W vinm OFFICE VINYL Z FT;-] Q II %I STORAGE CARPET S VINYL VINYL . 308 1 VINYL 1 1 I ORed Barn AnAiawun A PPOP05ED THIRD FLOOR PLAN PROPOSmTHIRE) 5CALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' FLOOR PLAN A-1 .3 ii ti it �� ��� a � . �` .! . I . i� 1 1 � � . ��� �� RED BARN ARCHITECTURE 84 High Street Ip..."MA 01936 978.595.6764 Project Name NevE�anE fkvdoPiwrA Dee 101t n Rmow Ad,ium S—M: I la'=1•-V Oab: Ngw115,MI9 0—by: R* Choe by:R* 7 A Ne ELEV HEAD HOU5E EL.+47-5' ——————————————————————————————————__----__ ---------------------------- (TOP OF CORNICE) � a d 1 �I-I O N b ROOF HEIGHT EL.+42'-5" ,� o (TOP OF CORNICE) EE -0 I a a x h THIRD FLOOR EL.+31 __ ______________ O _x (fOP OF FINISH FLOOR) W 1] O C, cu O w +0 U 5ECONDFLOOR EL.+21'-7" _ _ _ _________ __ W cu ITOP OF FI N15H FLOOR) NW D 0 V E Ello PIFIR57 FLOOR EL.+I I'-G' _ 'f �V cc OF OF FINI5H FLOOR) - - - �'•- 'i o < j W LLJ /2 W Z a PR0P051D FRONT ELEVATION OR.tl Barn ArcM1n.qun PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION A-2.1 i , RED BARN ARCHITECTURE 64 High Street IPBwich,MA 019M 978.595.6764 ProI.e1 name N E*WDewbpnent Das ptl.n fl—AW Ada Scab: i/f=1'-w Dab: Auaue[i5,]D19 Dawn by: RM< a ELEV HEAD HOU5E EL.+47'$' ______--___— ____________________ ____— rD `o (TOP OF CORNICE) 1•— y P D a ROOF HEIGHT EL.+42'-B" (TOP OF CORNICE) o s -MEE j �EdLJILJ Li 1-1 a THIRD FLOOR EL.+31'-8" (TOP OF FINISH FLOOR) 06 W " FM C O cu SECOND FLOOR EL.+2 P-7' —_—— ——————————————— (TOP OF FINISH FLOOR)—__———— cu L HE m CD 2a if Q�m 19 - - 0O v U.2 I - U N FIRST FLOOR EL.+1 O M I'-6" (TOP OF FINISH FLOOR) cu W W W Z !n PROP05ED LEFT 51DE ELEVATION e flH Bun Ncb PROPOSEDSIDE ELEVAnON A-2.2 i � i � i i � � _ �� . �� , ,4,, i . ,� , � . ;� . � � ii� I� ! J RED BARN ARCHITECTURE 84 High SU—t Ipswich,MA 01938 978.595.6764 P Jaea Name New E*MD bpn D—.Hp8an ReamE°NPASEon Seek: 11P=1'-P Data: AupuY I5,A19 Drawn by: RMc Chackatl by:RMc ELEV HEAD HOU5E EL.+47-8" ______ ________________ (fOP OF CORNICE) a 7 w ROOF HEIGHT EL.+42'-8° — Zj eo (TOP OF CORNICE) u n o = P $ IL a m as [EIL Ed c D e „ L Ira a a THIRD FLOOR EL.+31'-8" (TOP OF FINISH FLOM ® ® wx w C SECOND FLOOR EL.+21'T' _ _ ____ __ O (fOP OF FINISH FLOOR) 4-0 M M n'� L NW {. FIRST FLOOR EL.+1 I'-G" __ _ _ _ I _— ^` (TOP OF FIN15H FLOOR) ��` __ /WD `t 0UGE V OM Q U NW N Z A PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION A-2.3 i _ i _ i . � _ i . i . i . i i � , i . RED BARN ARCHITECTURE 84 High S— IP.M.h,MA.. 978.595.6764 E New PZ lName ipgnd Derokpmnt D—rlpti, lk.w NAdit. S.A.: 1/1•-1'-a Dab: AuDuals,mlr Drawn by: W, Ch—k.d by: RW ELEV HEAD 11 5E EL.+47'-8" (TOP OF CORNICE) n a ROOF HEIGhT EL._+42'-8" (TOP OF CORNICE) u a M 11 FE111' =[Ell Hil I u x9 � a n 9 c 9 o s THIRD FLOOR EL. (TOP OF FINISH FLOOR) �------------- --------- ---- f LJ Ll Ll 06 SECOND FLOOR EL.+21'-7" (fOP OF FIN15H FLOOR) 4-1 ca tU ILLH FIRST FLOOR EL.+II'-6' (TOP OF FINISH FLOOR) Ynd }/ M Vl U � Q U NW N Z A. PROPOSED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION �.- SCALE: 114• 1'-O• Barn ARhpd�n PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION A-2.4 1� I I �. . III �I� �!I �� �l }� i � I . I i ` ,I, t� Appendix D Stormwater Management Report Site Redevelopment Plans 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. dated July 22,2019 i i i . i . i. �. i . i . i . i, The M.6n*n-Cameron ANWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT SITE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS JULY 22, 2019 CIVIL ENGINEERS• LAND SURVEYORS• ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LAND USE PLANNERS 66 Elm Street, Danvers, MA 01923 978.777.8586 FAX 978.774.3488 Providing Professional Services Since 1978 I 1 I I I f � - �� I !1 1 i� i�_�a� � . �� 1 a I ' { � I�1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT SITE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS JULY 22, 2019 SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION CITY HALL ANNEX 98 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MA 01970 APPLICANT: NEW VIEW ADDICTION REHABILITATION & EDUCATION CENTER, INC. 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET SALEM, MA 01970 SH OF At4S MICHAEL C." G O CIVIL - No.52053 op �FG/STEP�Q O�FSsr�AL Table of Contents STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Page I Executive Summary 1 11 Existing Site Description 1 III Proposed Site Description 2 IV Stormwater Management 2 V Review of Stormwater Standards 3 VI Conclusion 5 TABLES • Watershed Summary 2 FIGURES • Figure 9: USGS Locus Photo • Figure 2: Ortho Image • Figure 3: SCS Soils Map ■ Figure 4: FEMA Firm Map APPENDICES ■ Appendix A MassDEP Stormwater Management Report Checklist • Appendix B Construction Phase Best Management Practices O&M Plan ■ Appendix C Long Term Best Management Practices O&M Plan • Appendix D Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement • Appendix E Stormwater Management Calculations ■ Appendix F Soil Boring Logs STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT NARRATIVE 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts July 22,2019 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT 1-3 East Collins Street I. Executive Summary New View Addiction Rehabilitation&Education Center, Inc.,the applicant, proposes to redevelop the property located at 1-3 East Collins Street in Salem, Massachusetts. The redevelopment project includes construction of a new three-story building in approximately the same location as y"c Zzz.:og tuwcii��g �5# t1he site, which will be used io provide rehabilitdtion and education services to the local community. Additional site improvements will include increased landscaped (pervious) areas, a new parking lot, walkways, utilities and a vegetated stormwater management system. The subject property is known as parcel 277 on the City of Salem Assessor's Map 36 and is comprised of 41,746 square feet (SF) of land. The following stormwater narrative contains a description of existing and proposed site conditions, stormwater management design methodology, results summaries and other supplementat information in support of the stormwater best management system design. II. Existing Site Description The existing site includes a vacant single story building that was previously used as a social club and bar room, which also served as a function hall and special event center. The building is situated toward the front of the site near East Collins Street, and parking is provided to the front, rear and east of the building. A portion of the parking lot extends onto the adjacent property which is owned by New England Power Company,who also benefits from a gas easement through the property. The existing building will be demolished during the construction phase, and all existing pavement on site will be removed prior to commencement of new site work. The site is bordered to the west by East Cottins Street, to the north by New England Power Company land and Planters Street, to the east by the shoreline of Collins Cove/Beverly Harbor, and to the south by a residential property. The easterly portion of the site is comprised of coastal resource areas such as salt marsh, coastal dune, coastal bank and coastal beach. Grades on the site are highest to the west at East Collins Street, and slope downward to the east toward the coastal bank. There is a small earthen berm at the back edge of the existing paved parking area, which defines the coastal bank on the subject property. There is an old catch-basin along the bottom of the berm which no longer functions as intended. Stormwater runoff flows along the back edge of the parking lot in an easterly direction, toward the low point where it ultimately flows into landscaped area and toward the shoreline. Soils on site are classified as Urban Land (602), as defined in the Soil Resource Report for Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part Version 10 dated June 29, 2015 (See Figure 3: SCS Soils Map). Geotechnical field testing performed by Kevin Martin, PE in April of 2019 identified the native soil conditions, which are overlain by historic fill material. The native soils are fine sands with silts, and thin layers of peat were observed in certain locations. Congruent with historic tidelands and marshlands, the groundwater table is relatively high, located approximately three to four feet below the ground surface. See the soil boring locations and results in Appendix F. The entire site is shown to be in a Zone AE (Elevation 10.Q NAVD88) on the FEMA Federal Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)#25009C0417G, dated July 16, 2014(See Figure 4: FEMA Map). i 1-3 East Collins Street Salem, Massachusetts July 22,2019 III. Proposed Site Description The proposed redevelopment project includes construction of a new three-story building with a flat roof in the same general vicinity of the existing building, and construction of a new parking lot utility connections and landscape improvements. The existing building and alt existing pavement on site will be removed during construction. The new parking lot will provide 18 on- site parking spaces, primarily located in the rear of the building. The totat pavement reduction for the project equals 3,766 SF±,with the majority occurring within 100 feet of the coastal bank. Due to the addition of new sidewalks and other impervious areas, the total impervious area reduction is 2,740 SF±. The new landscape areas wilt be planted with a variety of native trees, shrubs and perennials,and the vegetated stormwater area wilt be planted with a diverse meadow seed mix. The limit of work for this project falls entirely within previously disturbed areas,and is generally limited to the edge of the existing parking tot. IV. Stormwater Management A summary of the site characteristics in both the existing and proposed conditions is presented in the table below, followed by a calculation for the storage volume that the subsurface recharge system design was based upon. WATERSHED SUMMARY Existing Proposed %Difference (SF) (SF) Landscape 24,104 26,844 +11% Roof Area 5,240 4,862 -7% Pavement 11,911 8,145 -32% Sidewalks,etc. _ 491 1,895 TOTAL LOT AREA 41,746 41,746 Total Impervious 17,642 14,902 16%reduction %Impervious 42% 36% As a result of the decrease in total impervious coverage on site, this is considered a Redevelopment Project under the MassDEP Stormwater Management Handbook and is therefore subject to certain Stormwater Standards only to the maximum extent practicable. The drainage patterns in the proposed condition wilt substantially match the existing drainage patterns,which Wilt ensure that no adverse off-site impacts are experienced. The existing catch basin in the rear of the building will be removed as it does not function properly, and runoff will instead be conveyed to the new surface-based stormwater areas. Peak rates and volumes of runoff will be reduced in the proposed condition by virtue of the decrease in impervious cover (2,740 SF±); therefore, no further hydrologic analysis is required. Water quality will be enhanced by removing 3,766 SF± of pavement from the property, along with the installation of a naturally vegetated stormwater infiltration basin and sediment forebay on the easterly portion of the property. 2 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts July 22,2019 V. Review of Stormwater Management Standards The following section describes how the proposed project complies with the Stormwater Management Standards: 1. No new stormwater conveyances (e.g. outfalls) may discharge untreated stormwater directly to or cause erosion in wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth. The project meets this standard as there are no new untreated discharges from the project site. The existing drainage discharge locations will be preserved and the on-site drainage patterns are generally being maintained. Total impervious area will be reduced and all stormwater wilt flow toward the areas that currently receive runoff, which witl reduce the potential for erosion in wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth. In addition to the water quality benefits realized by reducing the amount of pavement on the site,treatment is also proposed in the easterly portion of the site through the use of a vegetated infiltration basin with sediment forebay. 2. The stormwater management system shall be designed so that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development discharge rates forall storm events The project meets this standard as the proposed peak rates of stormwater runoff do not exceed the existing rates of stormwater runoff for all storm events. Due to the 2,740 SF#decrease in total imperious area on the site,there will be a decrease in both peak rates and volumes of runoff in the proposed condition. 3. Loss of annual recharge to groundwatershall be eliminated or minimized through the use of infiltration measures including environmentally sensitive site design, low impact development techniques, stormwater best management practices, and good operation and maintenance. At a minimum, the annual recharge from the post-development site shall approximate the annual recharge from pre-development conditions based on soil type. This Standard is met when the stormwater management system is designed to infiltrate the required recharge volume as determined in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. The project meets this standard as there will be no increase in imperious area; therefore, the required recharge volume is zero. Loss of annual recharge to groundwater is being managed by the 2,740 SF± reduction in imperious area on the project site. Replacing pavement with landscaping creates the potential for groundwater recharge through the soil surface where none existed before. Additionally, a vegetated infiltration basin is proposed in the easterly portion of the site, which has a volume of approximately 300 cubic feet. The recharge capacity in the proposed condition exceeds the recharge capacity of the site under existing conditions. 4. Stormwatermanagement systems shall be designed to remove 80106,of the average annual post-construction load of Total Suspended Solids(TSS). The new treatment measures proposed on the site include a sediment forebay and vegetated infiltration basin,which will work in combination to provide a minimum of 80%TSS removal from the majority of pavement on the subject property. There is also a 3,766 SFt reduction in the total pavement area on the subject property, which further improves stormwater quality as compared to existing conditions. 3 1-3 East Collins Street Salem, Massachusetts July 22,2019 5. For land uses with higher potential pollutant loads, source control and pollution prevention shall be implemented in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook to eliminate or reduce the discharge of stormwater runoff from such land uses to the maximum extent practicable. This standard does not apply. 6. Stormwater discharges within the Zone II or Interim Wellhead Protection Area of a public water supply,and stormwater discharges near or to any other critical area, require the use of the specific source control and pollution prevention measures and the specific structural stormwater best management practices determined by the Department to be suitable for managing discharges to such areas, as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. This standard does not apply. 7. A redevelopment project is required to meet the following Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent practicable.• Standard 2, Standard 3, and the pretreatment and structural best management practice requirements of Standards 4, 5, and 6. Existing stormwater discharges shall comply with Standard 1 only to the maximum extent practicable. A redevelopment projectshall also comply with all other requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards and improve existing conditions The proposed project is considered a redevelopment project since it occurs on an entirely developed site and results in a decrease in impervious cover. Therefore, compliance with certain standards is only required to the maximum extent practicable. However, the proposed project fully meets all Stormwater Management Standards as described herein. Existing stormwater management conditions are being_improved by: - the reduction in total impervious area - the installation of a vegetated sediment forebay and infiltration basin - the creation of a Long Term Operation and Maintenance Plan for the parking lot and vegetated stormwater system. 8. A plan to control construction-related impacts including erosion,sedimentation and other pollutant sources during construction and land disturbance activities(construction period erosion, sedimentation, and pollution prevention plan) shall be developed and implemented. The project meets this standard. Refer to the Construction Phase Operation and Maintenance Plan prepared by MCG, dated July 22, 2019. 9. A long-term operation and maintenance plan shall be developed and implemented to ensure that stormwater management systems function as designed. The project meets this standard. Refer to the Long-Term Operation and Maintenance Plan prepared by MCG, dated July 22, 2019. 4 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,Massachusetts July 22,2019 10. Illicit discharges: To the best of our knowledge and belief there are no illicit discharges to the stormwater management system on this site. The proposed development meets this standard. An Illicit Discharge Statement is included herein. VI. Conclusion This re-development project,as proposed, provides an effective and efficient means of managing stormwater runoff, and represents a significant improvement over the existing conditions on the site. Full compliance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook has been demonstrated. Ultimately,this project will result in both aesthetic and environmental improvements,with a new building, increased landscape areas, natural stormwater management measures and protection of the adjacent coastal resource areas. For questions regarding this report, please contact The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. between the hours of 8:30am to 4:30pm at(978) 777-8586. t . 5 FIGURES ek Ar - - - LOCUS 01 160 200 �J ORTHO PH TO 66 ELM STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET P 1978.777.8586 F 1978.774.3488 IN WWW.MORINCAMERON.COM SALEM, MA DATE: JULY 22, 2019 Scale: I" = 100' E y FIGURE #I ■ • k �„. ;r • te. •+yam?r�� ■w � • iqt f • • a ♦ '� R! ■ l�, a * � E ■ y 4 lop f ■ c . LOCUS •a y4F#+ ! • ■ r • ■ / r ■ LI f' •tY'o t �R / '& a h yflR o •.e •r • � L.aA 11 �.i - s r i ■�i . to a a qr *� � • Mn4 s any / � / ■ : / r y1�► - a '° ' 4 . .`• r . ate« It x /a • 3 ae o 1a t* S• A ■ �i 00 40 1p' '' • '* _ Y 3 to Ry! r !/• •,t ■ 'W g•i• •a*�r•!I k \ f .',y,r ` #' i�. � � r! •■pR� .jj,� .■ ■•m�'t'' 1 r• �• •dAal ■ s ■ +• �• '1J �'� � - •�Re • , b}r:N @;\ t A � + r� r • r +E Y A lt• !_ fi�q !! ��. !' ■ ° :•!4 wq: ems 411 • • ■ 1 �. r + k �� t R l • '"# a y.dr#■ s ! ■ • � i a .R [ �. le 1C .• �, *� ••• ` „� �n*•a't • ,• :q�'�a»ram' ' •' � y a i r • * 4 s • iH•` * •, �,,. .t �� ; .t° 0 250 500 1,000 -: USGS MAP 66 ELM STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET P 1978.777.8586 F 1978.774.3488 IN WAPil1.i-i0FlNCAy1,ER0N.00M SALEM, MA DATE: JULY 2212019 SCALE: I" = 500' FIGURE #2 W a 0 a a LOCUS i � ! Y .. 32A - r SOIL TYPES: 602 - URBAN LAND 0 40 80 160 32A - WAREHAM LOAMY SAND (HSG A/D) 7} aJ� �;� � � SCS SOILS MAP 66 ELM STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 r 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET P 1978.777.8586 F 1978.774.3488 IN WWW"6"iORINCAMERON.COM SALEM, MA DATE: JULY 22, 2019 SCALE: 1" = 81 FIGURE #3 H E •❑ C. Zjone-AE p- ilk- LOCUS i - CITY i>>F SAL1-,A1 '.r MINIMAL Fit'- -H D Zar,rx• I� nc X r r rlpqr _ , f, � r t r •� t � DEL rr a� s r r 1i T 411 , r 0 200 400 800 FEMA MAP No: 25009CO417G FEMA FIRM MAP 66 ELM STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREET P 1978.777.8586 F 1978.774.3488 IN WWW.MCRINCAMERON.COM SALEM, MA DATE: JULY 22, 2019 Scale: I" = 200' FIGURE #4 APPENDIX A: MASSDEP STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT CHECKLIST Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report A. Introduction Important:When A Stormwater Report must be submitted with the Notice of Intent permit application to document filling out fomu compliance with the Stormwater Management Standards.The following checklist is NOT a substitute for on the computer, Report S th e Stormwater e rt d (which should provide more substantive and detailed information use only the tab P )but is offered key to move your here as a tool to help the applicant organize their Stormwater Management documentation for their cursor-do not Report and for the reviewer to assess this information in a consistent format.As noted in the Checklist, use the return the Stormwater Report must contain the engineering computations and supporting information set forth in key' Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook.The Stormwater Report must be prepared and certified by a Registered Professional Engineer(RPE) licensed in the Commonwealth. The Stormwater Report must include: • The Stormwater Checklist completed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer(see page 2)that certifies that the Stormwater Report contains all required submittals.'This Checklist is to be used as the cover for the completed Stormwater Report. • Applicant/Project Name • Project Address • Name of Firm and Registered Professional Engineer that prepared the Report • Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan required by Standards 4-6 • Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan required by Standard 82 • Operation and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9 In addition to all plans and supporting information,the Stormwater Report must include a brief narrative describing stormwater management practices, Including environmentally sensitive site design and LID techniques, along with a diagram depicting runoff through the proposed BMP treatment train. Plans are required to show existing and proposed conditions,identify all wetland resource areas,NRCS soil types, critical areas, Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads(LUHPPL), and any areas on the site where infiltration rate is greater than 2.4 inches per hour. The Plans shall identify the drainage areas for both existing and proposed conditions at a scale that enables verification of supporting calculations. As noted in the Checklist, the Stormwater Management Report shall document compliance with each of the Stormwater Management Standards as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. The soils evaluation and calculations shall be done using the methodologies set forth in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. To ensure that the Stormwater Report is complete,applicants are required to fill in the Stormwater Report Checklist by checking the box to indicate that the specified information has been included in the Stormwater Report. If any of the information specified in the checklist has not been submitted,the applicant must provide an explanation. The completed Stormwater Report Checklist and Certification must be submitted with the Stormwater Report. The Stormwater Report may also include the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement required by Standard 10. If not included in the Stormwater Report,the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement must be submitted prior to the discharge of stormwater runoff to the post-construction best management practices. Z For some complex projects,it may not be possible to include the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan in the Stormwater Report. In that event,the issuing authority has the discretion to issue an Order of Conditions that approves the project and includes a condition requiring the proponent to submit the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan before commencing any land disturbance activity on the site. 3500.a DEP checldist.doc•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page 1 of 8 .LllMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program l� Checklist for Stormwater Report B. Stormwater Checklist and Certification The following checklist is intended to serve as a guide for applicants as to the elements that ordinarily need to be addressed in a complete Stormwater Report.The checklist is also intended to provide conservation commissions and other reviewing authorities with a summary of the components necessary for a comprehensive Stormwater Report that addresses the ten Stormwater Standards. Note:Because stormwater requirements vary from project to project, it is possible that a complete Stormwater Report may not include information on some of the subjects specified in the Checklist. If it is determined that a specific item does not apply to the project under review, please note that the item is not applicable(N.A.)and provide the reasons for that determination. A complete checklist must include the Certification set forth below signed by the Registered Professional Engineer who prepared the Stormwater Report. Registered Professional Engineer's Certification I have reviewed the Stormwater Report, including the soil evaluation,computations, Long-term Pollution Prevention Plan,the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan(if included),the Long- term Post-Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan,the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement(if included)and the plans showing the Stormwater management system, and have determined that they have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards as further elaborated by the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. I have also determined that the information presented in the Stormwater Checklist is accurate and that the infonnation presented in the Stormwater Report accurately reflects conditions at the site as of the date of this permit application. Registered Professional Engineer Block and Signature 0 O`er MICHAEL LAHAM m v CIVIL y N0.52053 9 'PFclS1Tc.R�O rtr� ' �sS/ONAI i 7 2209 ;iganature and Date Checklist Project Type: Is the application for new development, redevelopment, or a mix of new and redevelopment? _ ❑ New development ® Redevelopment ❑ Mix of New Development and Redevelopment 3500.a DEP checklist.doc•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist•Page 2 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist(continued) LID Measures: Stormwater Standards require LID measures to be considered. Document what environmentally sensitive design and LID Techniques were considered during the planning and design of the project: ® No disturbance to any Wetland Resource Areas ❑ Site Design Practices(e.g. clustered development, reduced frontage setbacks) ® Reduced Impervious Area(Redevelopment Only) ® Minimizing disturbance to existing trees and shrubs ❑ LID Site Design Credit Requested: ❑ Credit 1 ❑ Credit 2 ❑ Credit 3 ® Use of"country drainage'versus curb and gutter conveyance and pipe ❑ Bioretention Cells(includes Rain Gardens) ❑ Constructed Stormwater Wetlands(includes Gravel Wetlands designs) ❑ Treebox Filter ❑ Water Quality Swale ❑ Grass Channel ❑ Green Roof ® Other(describe): Vegetated Infiltration Basin Standard 1: No New Untreated Discharges ® No new untreated discharges ® Outlets have been designed so there is no erosion or scour to wetlands and waters of the Commonwealth ® Supporting calculations specified in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook included. 3500.a DEP cheddist.doc•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page 3 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Re port Checklist(continued) Standard 2: Peak Rate Attenuation ❑ Standard 2 waiver requested because the project is located in land subject to coastal storm flowage and stormwater discharge is to a wetland subject to coastal flooding. ❑ Evaluation provided to determine whether off-site flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour storm. ® Calculations provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre- development rates for the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour storms. If evaluation shows that off-site flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour storm,calculations are also provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development rates for the 100-year 24- hour storm. a,t ,� Z,7�'b SF—+- d�'res►Fe rN iw+�^Vtetus' �r�ea liµ P"°P Standard 3' Rechargecr��oN yjelali o- c*reerp*vJ6-� r,r4wa+et" i a p" of (r-oho4 -for OW s4vrok eveA4s. ® Soil Analysis provided. ,je peaucAvj JMpQr"'oof Area- Required Recharge Volume calculation provided. JZ*4U r,eJ I?ec6Arp V.1Utae : (j ❑ Required Recharge volume reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits. ❑ Sizing the infiltration, BMPs is based on the following method: Check the method used. ❑Static ❑Simple Dynamic ❑ Dynamic Field' ❑ Runoff from all impervious areas at the site discharging to the infiltration BMP. ❑ Runoff from all impervious areas at the site is not discharging to the infiltration BMP and calculations are provided showing that the drainage area contributing runoff to the infiltration BMPs is sufficient to generate the required recharge volume. ❑ Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume. ❑ Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume only to the maximum extent practicable for the following reason: ❑ Site is comprised solely of C and D soils and/or bedrock at the land surface ❑ M.G.L. c. 21 E sites pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000 ❑ Solid Waste Landfill pursuant to 310 CMR 19.000 ❑ Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent practicable. ❑ Calculations showing that the infiltration BMPs will drain in 72 hours are provided. ❑ Property includes a M.G.L.c.21E site or a solid waste landfill and a mounding analysis is included. 80%TSS removal is required prior to discharge to infiltration BMP if Dynamic Field method is used. 3500.a DEP checklist doc-04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page 4 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands Program 1lm Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 3: Recharge(continued) ❑ The infiltration BMP is used to attenuate peak flows during storms greater than or equal to the 10- year 24-hour storm and separation to seasonal high groundwater is less than 4 feet and a mounding analysis is provided. ❑ Documentation is provided showing that infiltration BMPs do not adversely impact nearby wetland resource areas. Standard 4:Water Quality The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan typically includes the following: 1 • Good housekeeping practices; • Provisions for storing materials and waste products inside or under cover, • Vehicle washing controls; • Requirements for routine inspections and maintenance of stormwater BMPs; • Spill prevention and response plans; • Provisions for maintenance of lawns, gardens,and other landscaped areas; • Requirements for storage and use of fertilizers, herbicides,and pesticides; • Pet waste management provisions; • Provisions for operation and management of septic systems; • Provisions for solid waste management; • Snow disposal and plowing plans relative to Wetland Resource Areas; • Winter Road Sat#and/or Sand Use and Storage restrictions; • Street sweeping schedules; • Provisions for prevention of illicit discharges to the stormwater management system; • Documentation that Stormwater BMPs are designed to provide for shutdown and containment in the event of a spill or discharges to or near critical areas or from LUHPPL; • Training for staff or personnel involved with implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan; • List of Emergency contacts for implementing Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan. ® A Long Term Pollution Prevention Plan is attached to Stormwater Report and is included as an attachment to the Wetlands Notice of Intent. ❑ Treatment BMPs subject to the 44%TSS removal pretreatment requirement and the one inch rule for calculating the water quality volume are included,and discharge: ❑ is within the Zone 11 or Interim Wellhead Protection Area ❑ is near or to other critical areas ❑ is within soils with a rapid infiltration rate(greater than 2.4 inches per hour) ❑ involves runoff from land uses with higher potential pollutant loads. ❑ The Required Water Quality Volume is reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits. ® Calculations documenting that the treatment train meets the 80%TSS removal requirement and, if applicable,the 44%TSS removal pretreatment requirement,are provided. 3500.a DEP checldist.doc•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist•Page 5 of 8 �--- Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program r Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist(continued) Standard 4:Water Quality(continued) ® The BMP is sized (and calculations provided)based on: ® The%n or 1°Water Quality Volume or ❑ The equivalent flow rate associated with the Water Quality Volume and documentation is provided showing that the BMP treats the required water quality volume. ❑ The applicant proposes to use proprietary BMPs,and documentation supporting use of proprietary BMP and proposed TSS removal rate is provided. This documentation may be in the form of the propriety BMP checklist found in Volume 2,Chapter 4 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook and submitting copies of the TARP Report, STEP Report,and/or other third party studies verifying performance of the proprietary BMPs. ❑ A TMDL exists that indicates a need to reduce pollutants other than TSS and documentation showing that the BMPs selected are consistent with the TMDL is provided. Standard 6: Land Uses With Higher Potential Pollutant Loads(LUHPPLs) ❑ The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)has been included with the Stormwater Report. ❑ The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the SWPPP will be submitted prior to the discharge of stormwater to the post-construction stormwater BMPs. ® The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit does not cover the land use. ❑ LUHPPLs are located at the site and industry specific source control and pollution prevention measures have been proposed to reduce or eliminate the exposure of LUHPPLs to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff,and been included in the long term Pollution Prevention Plan. ❑ All exposure has been eliminated. ❑ All exposure has not been eliminated and all BMPs selected are on MassDEP LUHPPL list. ❑ The LUHPPL has the potential to generate runoff with moderate to higher concentrations of oil and grease(e.g. all parking lots with>1000 vehicle trips per day)and the treatment train includes an oil grit separator, a filtering bioretention area, a sand filter or equivalent. Standard 6: Critical Areas ❑ The discharge is near or to a critical area and the treatment train includes only BMPs that MassDEP has approved for stormwater discharges to or near that particular class of critical area. ❑ Critical areas and BMPs are identified in the Stormwater Report. 3500.a DEP checklist.doc•04/01/08 T� Stormwater Report Checklist•Page 6 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 7:Redevelopments and Other Projects Subject to the Standards only to the maximum extent practicable ® The project is subject to the Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum Extent Practicable as a: ❑ Limited Project ❑ Small Residential Projects: 5-9 single family houses or 5-9 units in a multi-family development provided there is no discharge that may potentially affect a critical area. ❑ Small Residential Projects: 2-4 single family houses or 2-4 units in a multi-family development with a discharge to a critical area ❑ Marina and/or boatyard provided the hull painting, service and maintenance areas are protected from exposure to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff ❑ Bike Path and/or Foot Path ® Redevelopment Project ❑ Redevelopment portion of mix of new and redevelopment. ❑ Certain standards are not fully met(Standard No. 1, 8, 9,and 10 must always be fully met)and an explanation of why these standards are not met is contained in the Stormwater Report. ® The project involves redevelopment and a description of all measures that have been taken to improve existing conditions is provided in the Stormwater Report. The redevelopment checklist found in Volume 2 Chapter 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook may be used to document that the proposed stormwater management system(a)complies with Standards 2, 3 and the pretreatment and structural BMP requirements of Standards 4-6 to the maximum extent practicable and(b) improves existing conditions. Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan must include the following information: Narrative; • Construction Period Operation and Maintenance Plan; Names of Persons or Entity Responsible for Plan Compliance; • Construction Period Pollution Prevention Measures; • Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Drawings; Detail drawings and specifications for erosion control BMPs, including sizing calculations; • Vegetation Planning; • Site Development Plan; • Construction Sequencing Plan; • Sequencing of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls; • Operation and Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls; • Inspection Schedule; • Maintenance Schedule; • Inspection and Maintenance Log Form. ® A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan containing the information set forth above has been included in the Stormwater Report. 3500.a DEP checklist.doc-04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist-Page 7 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands Program Ch I LL-- ecklist for Stormwater Report Checklist(continued) Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control (continued) ❑ The project is highly complex and information is included in the Stormwater Report that explains why it is not possible to submit the-Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with the application.A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control has not been included in the Stormwater Report but will be submitted before land disturbance begins. ® The project is not covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit. ❑ The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit and a copy of the SWPPP is in the Stormwater Report. ❑ The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit but no SWPPP been submitted. The SWPPP will be submitted BEFORE land disturbance begins. Standard 9:Operation and Maintenance Plan ® The Post Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan is included in the Stormwater Report and includes the following information: ® Name of the stormwater management system owners; ' ® Party responsible for operation and maintenance; ® Schedule for implementation of routine and non-routine maintenance tasks; ® Plan showing the location of all stormwater BMPs maintenance access areas; ® Description and delineation of public safety features; ® Estimated operation and maintenance budget;and ® Operation and Maintenance Log Form. ❑ The responsible party is not the owner of the parcel where the BM is located and the Stormwater Report includes the following submissions: ❑ A copy of the legal instrument(deed, homeowner's association, utility trust or other legal entity) that establishes the terms of and legal responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the project site stormwater BMPs; ❑ A plan and easement deed that allows site access for the legal entity to operate and maintain BMP functions. Standard 10: Prohibition of Illicit Discharges ® The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan includes measures to prevent illicit discharges; ® An Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached; ❑ NO Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached but will be submitted prior to the discharge of any stormwater to post-construction BMPs. 3500.a DEP checklist.doc•04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist•Page a of 8 APPENDIX B: CONSTRUCTION PHASE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES O&M PLAN Construction Phase Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan for 1-3 East Collins Street Salem Massachusetts July 22,2019 The following operation and maintenance plan has been prepared as a guidance document for the efficient implementation,operation and maintenance of the on-site stormwater management systems. The following procedures shall be implemented to ensure success of the Stormwater Management Plan: 1. The contractor shall comply with the details of construction of the site as shown on the approved plans. 2. The stormwater management system shall be maintained as indicated below. 3. Effective erosion control measurers during and after construction shall be maintained until a stable turf is established on all altered areas. Basic Information Stormwater Management System Owner. New View Addiction Rehabilitation &Education Center 1-3 East Collins Street Salem, MA 01970 P:(978)853-5432 Salem Conservation Commission: 98 Washington Street,Second Floor Salem, MA 01970 P:(978)619-5673 Salem City Engineer: 98 Washington Street,Second Floor Salem, MA 01970 P:(978)619-5673 General Conditions 1. The developer shall be responsible for scheduling regular inspections and maintenance of the stormwater BMP's until the project has been completed. The BMP maintenance shall be conducted as detailed in the following long-term pollution prevention plan and illustrated on the approved design plans: "Site Redevelopment Plans 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem, Massachusetts prepared for New View Addiction Rehabilitation & Education Center, Inc." by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. dated July 22,2019. 2. All Stormwater BMP's shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the design plans and the following Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan. 3. The owner shall: a. Maintain an Operation and Maintenance Log(see Attachment A)for the last three years. The Log shall include all BMP inspections, repairs, replacement activities and disposal activities (disposal material and disposal location shall be included in the Log); b. Make the log available to the Salem Conservation Commission and City Engineer upon request; c. Allow members and agents of the Salem Conservation Commission and City Engineer to enter the premises and ensure that the Owner has complied with the Operation and Maintenance Plan requirements for each BMP. 4. A recommended inspection and maintenance schedule is outlined below based on statewide averages. This inspection and maintenance schedule shall be adhered to at a minimum for the first year of service of all BMP's referenced in this document. At the commencement of the first year of service,a more accurate inspection/maintenance schedule shall be determined based on the level of service for this site. Construction Phase Pottution Prevention Plan Erosion and Sedimentation Controls durina Construction: The site and drainage construction contractor shalt be responsible for maintaining the stormwater system during construction.Routine maintenance of all items shall be performed to ensure adequate runoff and pollution control during construction. The proposed sediment and erosion controls will be placed as shown on the Erosion Control& Site preparation Plan prior to the commencement of any clearing, grubbing, and earth removal or construction activity. The integrity of the erosion control barrier wilt be maintained by periodic inspection and replacement as necessary. The erosion control barrier wilt remain in place until the first course of pavement has been placed and all side slopes have been loamed and seeded and vegetation has been established. Silt sacks will be placed in the existing catch basins. Operations and maintenance plans for the Stormwater Management construction phase and tong term operation of the system have been attached to this report. Structural Practices: 1) Mulch Sock—A mulch sock sediment barrier will be constructed around the limit of work as indicated on the Erosion Control&Site Preparation Plan to prevent the spreading of fine sediments from the site. This control will be installed prior to major soil disturbance on the site. Mulch Sock Requirements a) Locate the mulch sock upland where identified on the plans. b) The mulch sock should be nearly level through most of its length to impound a broad,temporary pool The last 10 to 20 feet at each end of the mulch sock should be swung slightly uphill(approximately 0.5 feet in elevation)to provide storage capacity. c) Stake the mulch sock in accordance with the construction details. d) The mulch sock should be removed when it has served its useful purpose, but not before the upslope area has been permanently stabilized through one growing season and only following approval by the Conservation Commission or their representative. Retained sediment must be removed and properly disposed of, or mulched and seeded. Silt Fence Ins ection Maintenance a) The mulch sock should be inspected immediately after each rainfall event of 1-inch or greater, and at least daily during prolonged rainfall. Inspect the depth of sediment, tears, if the mulch sock is securely attached to the stakes,and to see that the stakes are firmly in the ground. Repair or replace as necessary. b) Remove sediment deposits promptly after storm events to provide adequate storage volume for the next rain and to reduce pressure on the mulch sock. Sediment will be removed from behind the mulch sock when it becomes about 4"deep at the mulch sock. Take care to avoid undermining the silt fence during cleanout c) If the mulch sock tears, decomposes, or in any way becomes ineffective, replace it immediately. d) Remove all mulch sock materials after the contributing drainage area has been properly stabilized.Any fabric or stakes should be removed. Sediment deposits remaining after the mulch sock has been removed should be graded to conform to the existing topography and vegetation. 2) Inlet Protection—Inlet Protection will be utilized around the existing catch basins and area drains that are installed. The inlet protection wilt allow the storm drain inlets to be used before final stabilization. This structural practice wilt allow early use of the drainage system. Siltsack or equivalent will be utilized for the inlet protection. Siltsack is manufactured by ACF Environmental. The telephone number is 800-448-3636. Regular flow siltsack will be utilized, and if it does not allow enough storm water flow, hi-flow siltsack will be utilized. Silt Sack for equivalent] Inlet Protection Inspection/Maintenance Requirements a) The silt sack trapping device and the catch basins should be inspected after every rain storm and repairs made as necessary. b) Sediment should be removed from the silt sack after the sediment has reached a maximum depth of one-half the depth of the trap. c) Sediment should be disposed of in a suitable area and protected from erosion by either structural or vegetative means. Sediment material removed shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable local,state, and federal regulations. d) The silt sack must be replaced if it is ripped or torn in anyway. e) Temporary traps should be removed and the area repaired as soon as the contributing , drainage area to the inlet has been completely stabilized. Stabilization Practices: Stabilization measures shall be implemented as soon as practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased,with the following exceptions. • Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 141"day after construction activity temporary or permanently cease is precluded by snow cover, stabilization measures shalt be initiated as soon as practicable. • Where construction activity will resume on a portion of the site within 21 days from when activities ceased, (e.g.the total time period that construction activity is temporarily ceased is less than 21 days)then stabilization measures do not have to be initiated on that portion of the site by the 141' day after construction activity temporarily ceased. 1) Temporary Seeding—Temporary seeding will allow a short-term vegetative cover on disturbed site areas that may be in danger of erosion. Temporary seeding will be done at stock piles and disturbed portions of the site where construction activity will temporarily cease for at least 21 days. The temporary seedings will stabilize cleared and unvegetated areas that will not be brought into final grade for several weeks or months. Temporary Seeding Planting Procedures* a) Planting should preferably be done between April 1n and June 30t',and September 1s, through September 31n. if planting is done in the months of July and August, irrigation may be required. If planting is done between October 1It and March 31n, mulching c) Select the appropriate seed species for temporary cover from the following table. Species Seeding Rate Seeding Rate Recommended Seeding Seed Cover (lbs/1,000 sq.ft.) (lbs/acre) Dates required Annual 1 40 April 15t to June 1st 1/a inch Ryegrass August 151h to Sept. 15' Foxtail 0.7 30 May 1st to June 3011 1/2 to 3/4 inch Millet Oats 2 80 April 111 to July 11 1 to 1-% August 15th to Sept. 15th inch Winter 3 120 August 151h to Oct. 15th 1 to 1-1h Rye - inch Apply the seed uniformly by hydroseeding, broadcasting, or by hand. d) Use effective mulch, such as clean grain straw,tacked and/or tied with netting to protect seedbed and encourage plant growth. T-emporary Seeding Inspection/Maintenance a) Inspect within 6 weeks of planting to see if stands are adequate. Check for damage within 24 hours of the end to a heavy rainfall,defined as a 2-year storm event(i.e., 3.2 inches of rainfall within a twenty-four hour period). Stands should be uniform and dense. Reseed and mulch damaged and sparse areas immediately. Tack or tie down mulch as necessary. b) Seeds should be supplied with adequate moisture. Furnish water as needed, especially in abnormally hot or dry weather. Water application rates should be controlled to prevent runoff. 2) Geotextiles- Geotextiles such as jute netting will be used in combination with other practices such as mulching to stabilize slopes. The following geotextile materials or equivalent are to be utilized for structural and nonstructural controls as shown in the following table. Practice Manufacturer Product Remarks Sediment Fence Amoco Woven polypropylene 0.425 mm opening 1198 or equivalent Construction Amoco Woven polypropylene 0.300 mm opening Entrance 2002 or equivalent Outlet Amoco Nonwoven polypropylene 0.150 mm opening Protection 4551 or equivalent Erosion Control Amoco Supergro or equivalent Erosion control revegetation mix, open (slope stability) polypropylene fiber on degradable polypropylene net scrim Amoco may be reached at(800)445-7732 Geotextite Installation a) Netting and matting require firm, continuous contact between the materials and the soil If there is no contact,the material wilt not hold the soil and erosion will occur underneath the material. Geotextite Inspection Maintenance a) In the field, regular inspections should be made to check for cracks,tears, or breaches in the fabric. The appropriate repairs should be made. 3) Mulching and Netting—Mulching will provide immediate protection to exposed soils during the period of short construction delays, or over winter months through the application of plant residues, or other suitable materials,to exposed soil areas. In areas, which have been seeded either for temporary or permanent cover, mulching should immediately follow seeding. On steep slopes, mulch must be supplemented with netting. The preferred mulching material is straw. Mulch [Hay or Straw] Materials and Installation a) Straw has been found to be one of the most effective organic mulch materials. The specifications for straw are described below, but other material may be appropriate. The straw should be air-dried;free of undesirable seeds&coarse materials. The application rate per 1,000 sq.ft. is 90-100 lbs. (2-3 bales)and the application rate per acre is 2 tons (100-120 bales). The application should cover about 90%of the surface. The use of straw mulch is appropriate where mulch is maintained for more than three months. Straw mulch is subject to wind blowing unless anchored, is the most commonly used mulching material, and has the best microenvironment for germinating seeds. Mulch Maintenance* a) Inspect after rainstorms to check for movement of mulch or erosion. if washout, breakage, or erosion occurs, repair surface, reseed, remulch, and install new netting. b) Straw or grass mulches that blow or wash away should be repaired promptly. c) If plastic netting is used to anchor mulch, care should be taken during initial mowings to keep the mower height high. Otherwise,the netting can wrap up on the mower blade shafts. After a period of time, the netting degrades and becomes less of a problem. d) Continue inspections until vegetation is well established. 4) Land Grading—Grading on fill slopes, cut slopes, and stockpile areas wilt be done with full siltation controls in place. Land Grading Design Ins illation Requirements a) Areas to be graded should be cleared and grubbed of all timber, logs, brush, rubbish, and vegetated matter that will interfere with the grading operation. Topsoil should be stripped and stockpiled for use on critical disturbed areas for establishment of vegetation. Cut slopes to be topsoiled should be thoroughly scarified to a minimum depth of 3-inches prior to placement of topsoil. b) Fill materials should be generally free of brush, rubbish, rocks, and stumps. Frozen materials or soft and easily compressible materials should not be used in fills intended to support buildings, parking lots, roads,conduits, or other structures. c) Earth fill intended to support structural measures should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of Standard Proctor Test density with proper moisture control,or as otherwise specified by the engineer responsible for the design. Compaction of other fills should be to the density required to control sloughing, erosion or excessive moisture content. Maxunum thickness of fill layers prior to compaction should not exceed 9 inches. d) The uppermost one foot of fill slopes should be compacted to at least 85 percent of the maximum unit weight(based on the modified AASHTO compaction test). This is usually accomplished by running heavy equipment over the fill. e) Fill should consist of material from borrow areas and excess cut will be stockpiled in areas shown on the Site Plans. All disturbed areas should be free draining, left with a neat and finished appearance,and should be protected from erosion. Land Grading Stabilization InspectionlMaintenance** a) All slopes should be checked periodically to see that vegetation is in good condition. Any rills or damage from erosion and animal burrowing should be repaired immediately to avoid further damage. b) If seeps develop on the slopes,the area should be evaluated to determine if the seep will cause an unstable condition. Subsurface drains or a gravel mulch may be required to solve seep problems. However, no seeps are anticipated. c) Areas requiring revegetation should be repaired immediately. Control undesirable vegetation such as weeds and woody growth to avoid bank stability problems in the future. 5) Topsoiling*—Topsoiling will help establish vegetation on all disturbed areas throughout the site during the seeding process. The soil texture of the topsoil to be used will be a sandy loam to a silt loam texture with 15%to 20%organic content. Topsoiling Placement a) Topsoil should not be placed while in a frozen or muddy condition, when the subgrade is excessively wet, or when conditions exist that may otherwise be detrimental to proper grading or proposed seeding. b) Do not place topsoil on slopes steeper than 2.5:1, as it will tend to erode. c) if topsoil and subsoil are not properly bonded,water will not infiltrate the soil profile evenly and it will be difficult to establish vegetation. The best method is to actually work the topsoil into the layer below for a depth of at least 6 inches. 6) Permanent Seeding —Permanent Seeding should be done immediately after the final design grades are achieved. Native species of plants should be used to establish perennial vegetative cover on disturbed areas. The revegetation should be done early enough in the fall so that a good cover is established before cold weather comes and growth stops until the spring. A good cover is defined as vegetation covering 75 percent or more of the ground surface. Permanent Seeding Seedbed Preparation a) In infertile or coarse-textured subsoil, it is best to stockpile topsoil and re-spread it over the finished slope at a minimum 2 to 6-inch depth and roll it to provide a firm seedbed. The topsoil must have a sandy loam to silt loam texture with 15%to 20%organic content. If construction fill operations have left soil exposed with a loose, rough,or irregular surface, smooth with blade and roll. b) Loosen the soil to a depth of 3-5,inches with suitable agricultural or construction equipment. c) Areas not to receive topsoil shall be treated to firm the seedbed after incorporation of the time and fertilizer so that it is depressed no more than V2 - 1 inch when stepped on with a shoe. Areas to receive topsoil shall not be firmed until after topsoiling and time and fertilizer is applied and incorporated, at which time it shall be treated to firm the seedbed as described above. Permanent Seeding Grass Selection/Application a) Select an appropriate cool or warm season grass based on site conditions and seeding date. Apply the seed uniformly by hydro-seeding, broadcasting, or by hand. Uniform seed distribution is essential. On steep slopes, hydroseeding may be the most effective seeding method. Surface roughening is particularly important when preparing slopes for hydroseeding. b) Lime and fertilize. Organic fertilizer shall be utilized in areas within the 100 foot buffer zone to a wetland resource area. c) Mulch the seedings with straw applied at the rate of 1/z tons per acre. Anchor the mulch with erosion control netting or fabric on sloping areas. Amoco supergro or equivalent should be utilized. Permanent Seeding InsnectionlMain_tenance a) Frequently inspect seeded areas for failure and make necessary repairs and reseed immediately. Conduct or follow-up survey after one year and replace failed plants where necessary. b) If vegetative cover is inadequate to prevent rill erosion, overseed and fertilize in accordance with soil test results. c) If a stand has less than 40%cover, reevaluate choice of plant materials and quantities of time and fertilizer. Re-establish the stand following seedbed preparation and seeding recommendations,omitting time and fertilizer in the absence of soil test results. If the season prevents resowing, mulch or jute netting is an effective temporary cover. d) Seeded areas should be fertilized during the second growing season. Lime and fertilize thereafter at periodic intervals, as needed. Organic fertilizer shall be utilized in areas within the 100-foot buffer zone to a wetland resource area. Dust Control: Dust control will be utilized throughout the entire construction process of the site. For example, keeping disturbed surfaces moist during windy periods wilt be an effective control measure, especially for construction access roads. The use of dust control will prevent the movement of soil to offsite areas. However, care must be taken to not create runoff from excessive use of water to control dust. The following are methods of Dust Control that may be used on-site: • Vegetative Cover—The most practical method for disturbed areas not subject to traffic. • Calcium Chloride—Calcium chloride may be applied by mechanical spreader as loose, dry granules or flakes at a rate that keeps the surface moist but not so high as to cause water pollution or plant damage. • Sprinkling—The site may be sprinkled until the surface is wet. Sprinkling will be effective for dust control on haul roads and other traffic routes. • Stone—Stone will be used to stabilize construction roads;also effective for dust control. The general contractor shall employ an on-site water vehicle for the control of dust as necessary. Non-Stormwater Discharges The construction de-watering and all non-stormwater discharges will be directed into a sediment dirt bag (or equivalent inlet protection)or a sediment basin. Sediment material removed shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. The developer and site general contractor wilt comply with the E.P.A.'s Final General Permit for Construction De-watering Discharges, (N.P.D.E.S., Section 402 and 40 C.F.R. 122.26(b)(14)(x). Ins ection Maintenance: Operator personnel must inspect the construction site at least once every 14 calendar days and within 24 hours of a storm event of 1/2-inch or greater. The applicant shall be responsible to secure the services of a design professional or similar professional(inspector) on an on-going basis throughout all phases of the project. Refer to the Inspection/Maintenance Requirements presented earlier in the"Structural and Stabilization Practices." The inspector should review the erosion and sediment controls with respect to the following: • Whether or not the measure was installed/performed correctly. • Whether or not there has been damage to the measure since it was installed or performed. • What should be done to correct any problems with the measure. The inspector should complete the Stormwater Management Construction Phase BMP Inspection Schedule and Evaluation Checklist, as attached,for documenting the findings and should request the required maintenance or repair for the pollution prevention measures when the inspector finds that it is necessary for the measure to be effective. The inspector should notify the appropriate person to make the changes and submit copies of the form to the Salem City Engineer. It is essential that the inspector document the inspection of the pollution prevention measures. These records will be used to request maintenance and repair and to prove that the inspection and maintenance were performed. The forms list each of the measures to be inspected on the site, the inspector's name,the date of the inspection,the condition of the measure/area inspected, maintenance or repair performed and any changes which should be made to the Operation and Maintenance Plan to control or eliminate unforeseen pollution of storm water. APPENDIX C: LONG TERM BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES O&M PLAN Long Term Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation and Maintenance Plan for 1-3 East Collins Salem_Massachusetts July 22,2019 The following operation and maintenance plan has been provided to satisfy the requirements of Standard 9 of the Mass DEP Stormwater Management Handbook associated with development of the site and associated infrastructure. The success of the Stormwater Management Plan depends on the proper implementation, operation and maintenance of several management components. The following procedures shall be implemented to ensure success of the Stormwater Management Plan: 1. The contractor shall comply with the details of construction of the site as shown on the approved plans. 2. The stormwater management system shall be inspected and maintained as indicated below. 3. Effective erosion control measurers during and after construction shall be maintained until a stable turf is established on all altered areas. 4. A Stormwater Management Maintenance Log(Attachment A)is included at the end of this Appendix. Basic Informati n Stormwater Management System Owner: New View Addiction Rehabilitation &Education Center 1-3 East Collins Street Salem,MA 01970 P:(978)853-5432 Salem Conservation Commission: 98 Washington Street,Second Floor Salem, MA 01970 P:(978)619-5673 Salem City Engineer: 98 Washington Street,Second Floor Salem, MA 01970 P:(978)619-5673 Long Term Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation&Maintenance Plan 1-3 East Collins Street,Salem,Massachusetts July 22,2019-Page 1 of 4 Erosion and Sedimentation Controls during Construction: The site and drainage construction contractor shalt be responsible for managing stormwater during construction.Routine monitoring of disturbed soils shall be performed to ensure adequate runoff and pollution control during construction. A sediment and erosion control barrier will be placed as shown on the Grading, Utility & Drainage Plan prior to the commencement of any clearing,grubbing,and earth removal or construction°activity. The integrity of the erosion control barrier will be maintained by periodic inspection and replacement as necessary. The erosion control barrier will remain in place until the first course of pavement has been placed and all side slopes have been loamed and seeded and vegetation has been established. Operations and maintenance plans for the Stormwater Management construction phase and long term operation of the system have been attached to this report. General Conditions 1. The site contractor shall be responsible for scheduling regular inspections and maintenance of the stormwater BMP's until the project has been completed. The BMP maintenance shall be conducted as detailed in the following long-term pollution prevention plan and illustrated on the approved design plans: "Site Redevelopment Plans 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem, Massachusetts prepared for New View Addiction Rehabilitation & Education Center, Inc.' by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. dated July 22, 2019. 2. All Stormwater BMP's shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the design plans and the following Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan. 3. The owner shalt: a. Maintain an Operation and Maintenance Log(see Attachment A)for the last three years. The Log shall include all BMP inspections, repairs, replacement activities and disposal activities (disposal material and disposal location shall be included in the Log); b. Make the log available to the Salem Conservation Commission and Salem City Engineer upon request; c. Allow members and agents of the Salem Conservation Commission and Salem City Engineer to enter the premises and ensure that the Owner has complied with the Operation and Maintenance Plan requirements for each BMP. 4. A recommended inspection and maintenance schedule is outlined below based on statewide averages. This inspection and maintenance schedule shall be adhered to at a minimum for the first year of service of all BMP's referenced in this document. At the commencement of the first year of service,a more accurate inspection/maintenance schedule shall be determined based on the level of service for this site. Long Term Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation&Maintenance Plan 1-3 East Collins Street,Salem,Massachusetts July 22,2019—Page 2 of 4 Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan LTPPP Ve stated Areas• Immediately after construction, monitoring of the erosion control systems shall occur until establishment of natural vegetation. Afterwards, vegetated areas shall be maintained as such. Vegetation shall be replaced as necessary to ensure proper stabilization of the site. Cost: Included with annual landscaping budget. Consult with local landscape contractors. Payed Areas: Sweepers shall sweep paved areas periodically during dry weather to remove excess sediments and to reduce the amount of sediments that the drainage system shall have to remove from the runoff. The sweeping shall be conducted primarily between March Wh and November 15th. Special attention should be made to sweeping paved surfaces in March and April before spring rains wash residual sand into the drainage system. Cost:Consult with local landscaping companies for associated costs if necessary. Salt used for de-icing on the roadway during winter months shall be limited as much as possible as this will reduce the need for removal and treatment. Sand containing the minimum amount of calcium chloride(or approved equivalent)needed for handling may be applied as part of the routine winter maintenance activities. Ve elated Infiltration Basin: The infiltration basin shall be checked regularly to ensure that the surface is free of debris such as leaves, sticks and trash. Remove and dispose of any debris in accordance with all applicable Local, state,and federal regulations. In the case that water remains in the facility for greater than three (3) days after a storm event,an inspection is warranted and necessary maintenance or repairs should be addressed as necessary. Cost:Consult with local landscaping companies for associated costs if necessary. Deb 's&Litter: All debris and titter shall be removed from the parking lot as necessary to prevent migration into the drainage system. Pesticides, Herbicides and Ferti' ers: Pesticides and herbicides shall be used sparingly. Fertilizers shall be restricted to the use of organic fertilizers only. All fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, sand and salt for deicing and the like shall be stored in dry area that is protected from weather. Cost: Included in the routine landscaping maintenance schedule. The Owner shall consult local landscaping contractors for details. Public Safety Concerns:Chemicals shall be stored in a secure area to prevent children from obtaining access to them. Any major spills shalt be reported to municipal officials. Prevention of Illicit Discha es: Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system are not allowed. Illicit discharges are discharges that are not comprised entirely of stormwater. Pursuant to Mass DER Stormwater Standards the following activities or facilities are not considered illicit discharges:firefighting,water line flushing, landscape irri ation uncontaminated groundwater, Potable water sources foundation drains, atr Long Term Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation&Maintenance Plan 1-3 East Collins Street,Salem,Massachusetts July 22,2019—Page 3 of 4 conditioning condensation,footing drains,individual resident car washing,flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, dechlorinated water from swimming pools, water used for street washing and water used to clean residential building without detergents. To prevent illicit discharges to the stormwater management system the following policies should be implemented: 1. Provisions For Storing Materials And Waste Products Inside Or Under Cover 2. Vehicle Maintenance And Washing Controls 3. Requirements for Routine Inspections of the Stormwater Management System (i.e.: vegetated infiltration basin) 4. Spill Prevention and Response Plans. Long Term Stormwater Best Management Practices Operation&Maintenance Plan 1-3 East Collins Street,Salem,Massachusetts July 22,2019—Page 4 of 4 �o d a>i ai Vf > E W '0 8 O! 16 dD L 07 � 10 c � of u ro o n - W '^ i a � L _z � L � 3 � � o t0 Q G :� a � = c � m 0 � m a W Y mi c M t a Q 2 c V L N ; N Lil r aci z m c a aci E ai W .Q di n c y T v ° 3 « c o m z ; °° '" o CL c o = a ° ° � � c3 to 3 �° m o " °_' oc ° o i rn ° ° c rnr 3 v a>. c � -0 M 0 c m'o 0= c O �' d c LA z y N p N VIW > 0V1a i $ d Lo W y '° Y $ O o c ' C. CL ai is N 2 N N W G Q t N V co L Q c 5 V M a V Y ° ~ 3 wta O s APPENDIX D: ILLICIT DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement I, Michael Laham. P.E., hereby notify the Salem Conservation Commission that I have not Witnessed, nor am aware of any existing illicit discharges at the site known as 1-3 East Collins Street in Salem, Massachusetts. I also hereby certify that the development of said property as illustrated on the final plans entitled "Site Redevelopment Plans 1-3 East Collins Street (Asessors's Map 36, Lot 277), Salem, Massachusetts, prepared for New View Addiction Rehabilitation &Education Center, Inc.,"prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. dated July 22, 2019 and as revised and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission and maintenance thereof in accordance with the "Construction Phase Pollution Prevention Plan" and "Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan" prepared by The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc dated July 22, 2019 and as revised and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission will not create any new illicit discharges. There is no warranty implied regarding future illicit discharges that may occur as a result of improper construction or maintenance of the stormwater management system or unforeseen accidents. Name: Michael Laham P.E. Company: The Morin-Cameron Group, Inc. Title: Owner's Representative Signature: Date: 7 Z� jq , APPENDIX E: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS July 22,2019 Stormwater Manaciement Calculations STANDARD 4:Water uali Volume V : Pretreatment Sediment Forebay(0.1"x Impervious Area) System Tributary Minimum Provided y Pavement Area Treatment Volume Forebay Volume Volume Sediment Forebay 7.055 s.f. 0.1" 58 cf 223 cf 1✓2"Water uatiV Volume System Tributary Minimum Provided y Pavement Area Treatment Volume Basin Volume Volume Infiltration Basin 7,055 s.f. 0.5" 294 of 296 cf Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Forebay Elevation surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) --------------------------------------- 6.50 190 0 + 6.60 293 24 6.70 395 59 6.80 498 103 6.90 600 158 7.00 703 223 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 2P: Basin Elevation surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) --------------------------------------- 6.50 412 0 6.60 484 45 6.70 556 97 6.80 627 156 6.90 699 222 7.00 771 296 � a k k � 0 o c � 2p LL § § § § § §ui © § UiQ: U; a& - §CD k 22 �$ a �� ■® L m� o■ E \M ■V-0 p « m o _a & a 0 e r U o ■ §S 0 2 © _ © 2 © a f 2 © E > ci 2 2 d 2 s ) « 2Of e $ w ■ / 0 @§ k § § § § § g :E m § \\�\k }}�w} I _ � § $� AW z� k- uL � § k k § § m m d e z .!! . £e m 3 \ «d2 « : /?d 7<«: &�■ m }�^ jam i)§� ■ :�} �9 «2, °» �\ z ■ 2 § §iw k & } m `d 2: ;§ � E � � u01�n�■o ■ ■! itoi� ISA0LU8H $$JL 1�2 to 0 x 0 APPENDIX F: SOIL BORING LOGS LL "Ila Llp -Vj o C:QL co CO3 Ait No\ ,g Ju d4 1. D.-- C-;- Q. Ir- 4-J) Awl Appendix E Site Presentation Plan Site Plan of Land 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheet 1 of 1) prepared by The Morin Cameron Group,Inc. dated October 18,2016 January 4,2017 City of Salem Board of Appeals Variance and Special Permit Concept Plan 1 Site Plan of Land 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheet 1 of 1) prepared by The Morin Cameron Group,Inc. dated February 22,2019 Concept 2 Site Plan of Land 1-3 East Collins Street, Salem,MA (Sheet 1 of 1) prepared by The Morin Cameron Group,Inc. dated March 1,2019 i i _ � � , �.. �; II I� �.y �� ly I r�:.l � '�;J :�:d �i. II II II� .7 85A 1•av + sty +r��(� f «7? �5 • 1 r IV !73- Lu ZONING DISTRICT-R1 REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED - " " SCHEDULE OF LOT ¢ `� LOT AREA 15 000 41,834± 41,834± �`-- y' / ~' I '`` " z "' �'r COVERAGES Z w 15,000 , . , ram. ar1 /e In 5229 unit ¢ ov tia u~ LOT FRONTAGE 100 94.50. 94.50' GENERAL SITE a N a z ` } 1 UPLAND AREA:25,240 SF(60.3%) w w y FRONT 15 21.6' 15.0' 4 ` .; �'' :+ r ° U) -j a p r E 1 ' ''• WETLAND AREA: 16,594 SF (39.7/o) ¢ c� SIDE 10 3.0 10.0 ' "„ ...; , 1• [ cn REAR 30 180'± 32'± i.`_ .,* f t EXISTING CONDITIONS w LOT COVERAGE 30% 12.5% 13.3% y,' ��' r' BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 5,238 SF(12.5%) ' ' LAWN&UPLAND:7,652(18.3%) o ll BETWEEN Bill2S-± _ - PAVEMENT/GRAVEL: 12,350 SF(29.5/o) 12 31 14* #i 1 z PARKING SPACES j PROPOSED CONDITIONS o BLDG.HEIGHT 35 35'OR LESS 35'OR LESS ;, - t• �` BUILDING FOOTPRINT:6 417 SF(15.3%) ¢ z MAX.STORIES 2.5 1 3 J �'"� r f LAWN&UPLAND: 13,300�SF(31.8%) z a �,.P,A a f i PAVEMENT/GRAVEL:5,529 SF(13.2%) w cn a O IN L P S ACES PR - , p • - ' WITHIN THE BUILDINGS. +�-T � UPLAND AREAIUNIT=1 UNIT/3,155 SF - a o PROJ.#3500 DRAWING; �� I� �+ I � I � 1 , . � � 1 . l . l . 1 . I � �{ CITY OF SAI.EM, MASSACHUSEM BOARD OF APPEAL 120 Was3tNGroN smu=•snum4=7u4T o tF_y P 2' t3 TER-978-745-9595 4 FAX: ._.j,� E OR FI4 �AII COPY UTEST CIT Y.0,LE0;SALE-M.MASS; Ilea- I Jtanuaty 4,2017 MY ERR P &BEM MASS. City of Salem Board of Appeals A peWon of hUCHAEL MEYER, TRUSTEE, tegueoft- a Special Permit per Sec 3.3.2 Noncon&mz&g Uses and Variances pet Sec. 4.1.1 I... . . .raal R0gnbvM9rre8 for the following minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum lot frontage, minimum distance bet Green ibuildings and maxiinum number of stories to construct eight (8) residential units at 1-3 EAST COLLINS STREIE"I'(Map 36 Lot 277)(R-1 Zoning District) At the October 19,2016 meeting,a public hearing was open pursuant to M.G.I.Ch.40A, § 1 I.Testimony Was heard on that date and the public hearing was continued on October 19,2016,November 16,2016 and December 21,2016.The hearing was closed on December 21,20.16 with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present Rebecca Curran Tsxtavnos. (Chair),Peter A. Gopelas,Mike Duffy,Tom Watkins,and Jimmy The Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.2 Nosep omiag Uses and Variances per .Sec. 4.1.1 Dr.'mm oral Il a fuirivents for the following minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum lot frontage, minimum distance between buildings,and**wimum number Of Stories to construct eight(8)residential units. Statements of fact: 1. Attorney Grover presented the petition on behalf of the petitioner. Dan Ricciar& of Seger Architects, of Salem MA and Scott Cameron, CE of Morin-Cameron Group, of Danvers, MA also presented testimony. 2. In March of 2015,the petitioner withdrew an application without prejudice for a development at this location for a residential use and submitted a significantly different application on September 27,2016 for review. 3. In the petition date-stamped September 27, 2016, the Petitioner requested a Special Permit per Sec. Per Sep 3.3.2 Nonc»nfarnring Uses of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to change and existing nonconforming use of a social club to another nonconforming use of malti-family residential units. The petitioner is also requesting Variances for relief from Seca 4.1.1 Table afDimemional Ropinweats for minimum lit area per dwelling unit,minimum lot frontage,minimum distance between buildings, and number of stories. 4. The property is located at the.Planters Street and,East Collins Street in an R.-1 Zoning Disttict. The precious use of the property was the Ward 2 Social Club. A TRUE CoPyAT EST S. At the Oftber 19,2016 p ;-Z A vans headu1 die party hsd l dstther�a n -oog arty, ,o .'Cify � W sty�:� had h* � the - 1116 n g Status of the PUT" � Board has the tg vee from o sum-co�fa�moiog use to,enot m ace-eon use by spe�lpmmit, a. [)n No+vembec 16, 201.6, rite a a of the pWb& hetiag to die neat nowwy whedided an December 21,2DI6.'No try ass Lewd at this 7. At the becesuber Z,2016 nwedn&die Beat+d nvkiwed and discussed the h Sd opinion,&+am she.City Sol tinted December 4,2016. 8. The Mowing an conclaim,fiom the leo opinion tdvvaat to the issues&=cased at the Ocsober 19 2016 pWAcheatit a no vft of the pmp y 1s ent+W to proftacd sWus as s I%*OXHMAonaiiag use mac M.61.[fit.4U Seeta b. i • The chib did not�its use of the property in jouety 2014,when it closed the builft to do per. • Tht sale of the property to&e petilimcr does tot cwo&m it temmim &=of the use of&a Ply e 1t it within tbG of the City of Salem Board of Appeals tD imaa spadd pm*to I%W ln erns ag use of.me Property W qua, provided that the Board is$= a finft that &e. mw we of rite Properly, is less deftiosental tm die exWq n oonfo anguse. 9. Dot psopcsty&Xcs was paW by tlWAtionet before the December 21,201b pub5c hea 10. On Nbvmbet 30, i948,vaious resents of the City of Soleaa fomsed the Chub as a idas�cd►usetts not Er-profit cmpontion oWnized under BLG.L. Ch. 180 for dte purpose. of promoting brothethood and cl aptyin the Watd II Diettict ofSaiem. 11. Un Norm ter 1, 1956, the Club acquired tide to the Psopeety for the pudrpose of wing a bu&HA9 to serve as the location for the charitable activities of its dip inchu4g a placie to hold sawdW and place where the public would be able to bold events,At this tmae,the property Was located in a Si$e,Residence District B and the 1955 Ordinance vas in effect Pursuant to Sec.4Z.5 the Use of the Property ryas it penaitted use is.the Single Rye is no longer a yam use by i&in the xt1 $District.Ue Social Clap is ja eahtittg non-confomitg use. Cbee Opinion 1 3 B.Collins St:Dated Dec,4,2016 for der ). 12. On Mq 21,201 S,the Club sold theprapecty to the petitioact.The land area of the property cots of 41,834 sgmt+e feet and hm a one-wary Conceeft block anmum the emewdog aimcb re does aot meet the cunnat flood&k constmctiom staudauids. 13.The petitioner is propusin to ch=V the use of the property fiom the non con&nnidg u"of a social chb to mutt fay residential dwelfi Wig one. 14.Ite pewuma testifies that the p toposed residential we of the ptopetiy is more conustaent with the ceding nieighbarbood use than the existing social dub and bar too m 15,Tire eraisting bu0du g cannot be tecotifitttitcted for attothGr pusltose under the Citapta 91 requirements due to t flood plain►cottsituaioti smlord As sudcb,the pe loaner is pt;oposing 0 demolish the i ' • AT UE I � 411'� Wand 2 Social Club shuctuft to oanswaa eight(8) deaw dwdlht g CLEP 16.3he PIPPOIled • *ht.(8)units wdl be clividedlrmo three{3),dVh=and two UALk , Tbe pedtioact testifies that the ptaposedzesidential we iscow w the vae of the and the dweft unit wrangetment of sin&and term.fly unite is�t with the ry. w 6., rt agemeat of.dwefiing vab WAin the Muouading s bo*ood 17. 1lte P is regg tt emit ptx Sec.3.32 htonoaafiamaiog Uses to the exbftnon-aia�'otttrmg0110 of due property fi+ostt the egg Ward 2 Social Club to nwitii-fatuity residential dwdlmg units in AVe and two(2)&Wly tn8ements. I&The Peddow eRxxb to ptnvide fultow p xbHc sees:to the wrtt t fhtvugb the pWpMy,in a -locadon deftembed.by the PlanningosW aid Mssasal► DqM*nent of 8 Pmwcdm PEP)&ORA the alapta91 gat gpooceat a t19. � {14) when die sse is tweIv+e{i2) qMCM The Salem Z,onutg Ordinance requires one mad a lmlf(1p ati�Og P 2D. Cume*,,thtte is one long wabcut with telldirty(30) 8:spaces ce the property: The peddom is propcsiug to reduce the number of parking spaces sad fotmaliIa s cu6cat that meets the tonalaqubement of a_�of 24'feet for as residential use. 21. Mt Cetne on,CE of Mctin4smexxon Group,of!`)ergs,MA testified that the eaisti%pnbtic utilmesend otbt public samm am ate to apport the pwposed tot{8)resideneW units, 22 Mrs Cm tort,CH of Moun4aamerm Group,of D=vaa6 MA wdW thst dw impacts an the natutat W*=QMI4 rncbuling dtakmV would be positive..The pad' corner is P WPO*9 to wduce the esistengdes 30'lo to i5°Ca'I1te gm+opett}i acooq*with aD stounwatet 23.The edet3ag Ward 2 Social Club sttucbm is 5,M square feet at 12,51%lot cavemge,in commpatisan, the five(3)proposed residential structures ate a total of 6,490 square feu at 133%lotcovemSp,Mr.. C.ameroat ftstifies dW the proposed amcufts wA have si milar lot eov+erage and footptkt areas as the 24. Mt.CMexrnm u stifreis drat emoting avetnge lot area per dwelling unit in the tmeigliborhocd one(1) dwelling unit per 46tti1 wpm feet:The wear is ptoposirsg a lot area pet dwelling unit of 5 M9 square fee%tnalat►g dte proposed development appro dmatr3y 30%less dense tl=nej&bozing dweft units. 25.Mt,Cammu testifies that the spacing between buildings is the eaistiag neighborhood is aPP 9 telft(10)to twenty(20)feet.The proposed distance between the buildinp at 1.3 East Collins Street is twenty-five(251 feet at the narrowest point 26.The footprints of the proposed bufldings are comparable to the existing footprints of the bu&liqp in the;tarraoonft ocad, 27.Mr. R"wA of 5ega Architects testified that the proposed building focttpt rots; . nmiassmg and architechmI design ati consistent vi th.the a dkocti ni dam,msssin&and foam of the le4gibiodlooil gar exasupk # lm proposed bi9dinp lm� mi Mm bmUng fm am dendervj&tie tests ju ofthfte den fitwvith the . , goft�dw�g X The ent of&e.bWMmV is in - m t?the P"C l+et _ ... -of the 29.The potntiat fisei' iin the Gly ta base i .%'ne Pemoner is Sled ftm (4) variances io&ftmivlmmlot stet► m#tmmmn lot fmriq�ge, +hem betunm bind,and mmmm stumbat of etot 31.Tltepeed�Papposed the ode mtions froao tite&MUW=d mrhmeM a)a k>t a PaU of5.m O Per.. ISAW b) 94.5 fix t of koafte wbm thn Ff the Zoub3g . Otadmanm is 100 equate feet ofliaear fimugn-c)a nimma,*M&a.of beoeeen 40 Is 24 stodft 32. The stall ' 'W14 or :gtesp affect the had, ire M' oidved,. taut a bi�md tt the name digit is tliSt a • ' �t P.�of tbie paropetty is swk toaatrh and coaa�al d and the ettfiaesite lip 110:fiorplaw,Furth e,xhe site is mod by on t f4ae,�e aatunal ►vvltich WS be in the near fat e.hu S mast of to 1aitWithin the j of the C mmonwealth.of MsUcbwsetts uuda Chapter 91.Ile e lead is also located in the most but admg by distdm that at are l live.These ccmdWom of this property malae the davelopmeut of the ift eq=uift and 33. lUpetitlom teWfies#bat the social"is no 1 viable to cMwmxd by its meat+fie de to �.Fu�ierthe g'b4ft oatmot be teconsgnctod far snot et puq�asee under the C.haptet 01 stets due to t plain .The Etnai en&memient of Jim S d oe VWM AM dIC.PtOpettY OWM to COMUUd a . =iqpe conditions ofthe land die'cost of the y e'i to micas would exceed the ofthe home fm the area. 34. The pettionet proposes s density of 3,300 Square latx cohere the�t is15,UOQ unit and testifies that the propioaed Of eW(8)redde6tw dwdi4g Units is ueede&A dqOe-fc use,which is an d6WAW vse by 2i&on the is n< t.an , use and woes art economic �the �' e hardship pouet due to the cost of condr=tjon n for dds property. 35.'nw petitioner is proposing 94.5 feet of f mtage where the require mt per the Zoning Oanance is lOO fiT feet of lidear fi+ontage.The fitontar is a pre-ex6t6g Sou alternative to provide illkll stallinear 36.The petitioner is proposing 2 -30'feet of distance between bindings where dse mutimum M jWred distance is 44 feet 37..Th,e p over is proposing to co=Mjct dvvetliug units that ate three(3):ice rather rhea the malimm SCOPIrment of 2.5 stories.Ue proposed Living areas are wised ln'0 underwth the but�iag by necessity b the eaticae pzopettgis lm*tedwlddn dw good one: Coastal crostcuction sequares that the first floor lse elevated abr�ve the tea(10)foot flood elevation, A RUE COPY ATTE 38. dr+�rll�yg unit=t►eatu=fit h ►t data not t the 3S'f maiomiaim 39.At tho PW&headusso sp�ia auq�po®t ofd�epet�itad. Tha&&M Dow ofAppe*afro"M&1 cOwIdenvd=of&c Wi&=PtesewAds►t rho"MC&ftizro and after *M%h Mklw of.the in the fin natcative and per, and the Petttiaag.'s, psresmtatioa and public may. makes the MOV4 findiW that the proposed project meets the pw of theC4 of Salem zoning MadbW fw Vim. 1. 'The ae a 'coa gs said �����ce� in odut b so � v�atved is the same k dat sa potdm of the prop"is sah#itch and coastal dume wad the e>i�e site}mot whhin the mod plain. Fakhe: the slut is tmvetsed by$n usemeat Soo:the $a lhwe„whi&_will.bye coft is the am fuam In addition,most of the brad,wiahin the ju&diction ofthe Codmmon of illasN� unda Cbgpw 91.The land is also located in the mast ieetLact�o ic. but g by�that are k,�sarstt�dve.These Moms of Ibis P make t}�e developx> t of the site annd 2. The literal meat of the provisions of the 02 dinaaoe tamW iAvrsh►e m6ftatial hat+ ship as the con of burg a e-f w*home on&e pupatty would fist aid the ma et a of d*ate, I Desitabble rdkfukay be gtanted without suibstaatial deteime it to the public-good,and without g or dadgating hom the intent of the district at the pupose of ordinance. FhuUo s for SpmW Fennit< 1. The proposed cheage use of a noaomng sataal club to soother -ConfazMing use of mutt% Mist uses in a single sad two(2)fly OnObStntent is not suibstantiatty snort Vital d1an the exwq non-conforming use to the itrf act on the wdA wonowic or amity needs wyed by the I PWPOML 2. There ate no impacts on tcaffc flow and safety,iacludiag pftk*and Joadiag as there an (1� padcirug'ipa�c es tit exceed the n pw*g its of the•Salem uniag 3. The capacity of the udlities and public services are not ntly affected by the pvt c ct. • 4. There am netpositive impacts one the narad environment;indad qg&aiuW as the existing pwpeny has 12,OOD,square feet of exift pavesneot surface. The petitioner is poposint to reduce the impervious sutface on the praperty to app>ros�uately 5,500 squaw feet 5. Thd prwposal itswpmves peigbboarhoad character as it improm the property and the residential use is Consistent wa the use of the surrounding neighborhood. The dwdbq ulm gn=gcm=of single and two- fin*units is consistent with the aaw+ ement of dwelling uno within the summdiag. rneighborhood. Further; proposed building footpnft, massing, density and architt dear are Ott with the awNtectu d deuti s,masw&density 9M form of the 6WOWN*ne Wlbodwod. 6. 'Me.potentW fi"impact;ixtdudigg aimpact bn the.City tsut boo isposidvc On&e basb of tiee abaft OWmeft of snd£ s,tC Ss� Bosa W ofAppeab vcftd£tvn Mebem C�a{Chair),PdaA.�.�iMY Tom, andTc=Wswai) &wwd awe,a to t o special Pexmrt peor.xM M.? hpiwpg6i V*&uc0*pw Af:f Of t�lE�IEpA it�3� �' wuCs .lot , > um des a bemm bm&ngk sad usxi==member ofstu des,to,Comsund ew J ftd&A ltdaifs subjft to:the.fb%vog ft ma,Conditions sad sau na I. The Pet oaer sysll all&Y and state sb►tAes,ak inanfts,codes and aguiadons. I All 8W, bye done as pa the PUN And &=Wow mbmiftd to gad B Coomtissiaooler I .All anammus of the &bm Fire t wwm to_smoke snd A* . toafetyab b sttdY 4; P "obtain a haft pew*plat to beouh*Aag . 5e ofmw bein hammy r-Wf existing sbww& b. A Cadficue of InVecdon shell be obtained. I A Cabe of Oocur=7 shall be obteiaed. & P ahal!obtain atneet n=" ng f m the Ch9 of Sam Assenoe's tlffioe and shall "id pumebet so as to be viame fio n the sumet 9. Peddoner k to obtain qqxmvd fk m eay Gq Bid or Comagasion hang ju&acdon hu&xuco but not .limited to,the Henning Board. Special Cmdidm- J%rQPFhC0At"PVVi&PWJhCWCWtDdw waftdcont peg;DEP C6pw 91 hoem ftqvi"=ftb. Cbsk Boud ofAgpesk A COPY OF TMS. DEMON HAS BEEN FaM WITH'TJM PLANNING BOARD AND THE€ ry amK ►rd�r ,��', � prc sue►t��7E6r�cnl.t.a�r ►��,�>� Ni A TRUE COPY ATTEST C u /RKI SALEM MASS. i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i N/F I I GENERAL NOTES: qY B.SIMILES s W\ R7 PLANTERS STREET I. THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR OUR CLIENTS USE ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A MAP 36.LOT 244 N/P PERMITS AND LOCAL APPROVALS,AND IS NOT TO BE USED OR RELIED UPON AS A L' l p /2H PAUL L LI SDtN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT OR ANY OTHER USE BY OTHERS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSEIiT OF A xLARv L.& I/ THE CONSTRUCTION GROUP.INC . < \ \\s W L•I j� W � 0 Slp `V/�' YAP Je,LOT 245 I I' 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS COMPILED FROM A PLAN TITLED'PLAN OF LAND SHOWING MISTING �l[ '�d" CONDITIONS TO ACCOMPANY A CONSERVATION COMMISSION NOTICE OF INTENT APPLICATION%AS AMR. [T PREPARED BY PATROWICZ LAND DEVELOPMEM ENGINEERING AND SHOULD BE CONSIDEREDON/F V '. J APPROXIMATE oZ rz-4EAST DJUAS SRtFE7 1 RIM=7.92� c SNH +IV W �`'�lfV ' ZONE 7�y 3, ABUTTER INFORMATION OBTAN&D FROM THE CITY OF SALEM ASSESSORS AND GIS DATABASES �I^llW1P 36,LIT 248O � ' U RIY=8.6 AND SHOULD CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE 4. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE j DETERMINED IN THE FIELD.BEFORE DESIGIDNG,EXCAVATING,BLASTING,INSTALLING,BACKFlLUNG, / oHM APPROX LOCATION 10' GRADING,PAVEMENT RESTORATION,REPAVING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION,ALL UTILITY COMPANIES = •� -W I ,, �� --'a• � WIDE GAS EASEMENT MUST BE NOTIFIED INCLUDING THOSE IN CONTROL OF UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.SEE ( , ¢ . G�� (PL BIN 447 PLAN 77) CHAPTER 370.ACTS OF 1903,MASSACHUSETTS CALL*DIG SAE'AT 1-868-344-7233.THE V q 1 NORIN-CAMERON GROUP,INC.ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A E �a ! O _ RIM=7,86 / \ NEW ENGLAN�D POWER CO. RESULT OF UTUTIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN.BEFORE FUTURE CONNECTIONS,THE W)0 d ,may o •`� / Jl g UGE '8• MAP 30.LOT 234 APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS MUST BE CONSULTED. - c,2�E TIMOTHY NIL�OOf81F11j�/i p�ti5ti D 3\ '( 1' / ' I '*w 5. BY DAMNATION OF THE CURRENTLY APPLICABLE FEMA FLOOD MAP THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN GW� F6 EASE A ZONE AE(E1=10)AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP,COMMUNITY PANE].N0. 'O p o$ MAP A LOT 491 25009C0417C WHICH BEARS AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY 16,2014. w Z B. WETLAND RESWRCE AREAS WERE IDENTIFIED AND FLAGGED BY WETLANDS LAND MANAGEMENT, BIT.CONIC. g 6 �\ INC IN JULY,2015 AND LOCATED IN THE FIELD BY NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION IN °j1W - r-_;�.. JULY,2015.TOP OF COASTAL BANK WAS CALCULATED BY OTHERS AND IS BASED ON / J�/� / O `, da ...+ 1" •�� PAVEMENT AND LOCATION _ _••_ TOPOGRAPHY ON OF FEMA BASE FLOOD ELEVATION USING MASSDEP POLICY/92-1 N� 1 .•-_.¢n FIGURE/4. s.r. 0' 1 CONNEII FAMILY IRREVOCABLE >/ / EAST COLLINS �0 /yA ,J O Sc9 A. /6 YAP LOT ST REET / \........ Try � � .._.. .. .. ENE AST CO NS STREETMAP 39,LOT 277 AREA-41JLT42 SF. QBUROERING VEGETATED -_ \ `/ :4_n::•:.::c::• / WETLANDS(BVW) / l I __ 100'SETBACK TO TOP Bit CONIC _-.?jjp / OF COASTAL BANK PAVED AREA _ / 1/ \ _ — —————----- s _ / / z CIIAR.L]E 8 g'gi / I '2,L -• /i'i///�� I" -^�/ pOS~ \ 'I• F I MANY CE."K+E STREET \ I `1�: i. / MAP X LOT 278 I CB / 'J'"/"'�- - - U •�J _ ~• —•-�07 I /' �0d ASSDEP PRESUMPTIVE LINE A / / • /, / TOP#COAST w I 2/ w BANK 9 CB)- WASTAL OItiE�—_„(' _ / / / ///�`�'/ w 'BOTTOM OF WASTAL w w_w i (h' LL BANK wBOC6 w w JI" w w T - NCH.91 FACILITY OF PUBLIC W ( ) w �` \ :�/ w\ \ n • ACCOMCALCU DATIONTED (FPFPA) OLLOWS FPA UNE-100'OFFSET w L w/�w w w w w w P /• MEASURED FROM MHW w � w wro w wId w ww w w w / w aN w 5� I 0 / N ( w w w /w� w w /y "' w w / NEW ENGLANDPOIER CO. ------ - ---- MAP 36.LOT 234 w w w w w L- -. /wGIFNAJ: IICAROL A MAYNARD w w w Xp }" BFApI�` 1 /MAP 36.U STREET 02 I (Wan•ffApl) WASTAL DUKE -7�c-- �cr / - J w MEAN HIGH WAGER ZD LL V) o= / ,' I I •� / / / (ELEV=3.6)NAVD . O 88 APPRO% Q ZUQ �J Q Z OU fnQ Ipi CFL 91 WATER DEPENDENT USE ZONE(WDUZ) � "J N CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS Q m AVERAGE LOT DEPTH-193.6' I N WDUZ UNE=0.25 X AVG,LOT DEPTH Cn MASSDEP PRESUMPTIVE LINE -48,4'OFFSET MEASURED FROM MHW V//— / 1 / /// bc PLAN U z O SCALE I'=20' z Q cs \ I J Q o fo 20 PROJ.#3500 1. 1. I. I. L I . I I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i lam B.� , I GENERAL NOTES: s W 027�X LOT jR4EET 1. THIS PLAN IS PREPARED FOR OUR CLIENTS USE ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF OBTAINING PA B.a FEINTS AND LOCAL APPROVALS,AND IS NOT TO BE USED OR RELIED UPON AS A „A.ARY L IJNIHAN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT OR ANY OTHER USE BY OTHERS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF \\s P '�>M pqy� 'I,�I I/ /2H PIRY L U INANSTRE THE MORNN-CANERON GROUP,ING, `V/'♦,' MM]8.LOT 245 I I s� 2. E70STING CONDITIONS COMPILED FROM A PLAN TITLED'PLAN OF LAND SHOWING EXISTING TO ACCOMPANY A CONSERVATIONAPPLICATION PREPAREDSBYY PATROYACZ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINIEERINGNOTICE AND SHOULD BET CONSIDERED••AS O SCOTT TR UHART 1 CEI / j\ �I L 100'BUFFER APPROXIMATE w z M2-4 EASE COUNS STREET I RIM=7.92 0 )'"W S SMH �C'�^^��K'l� �ILJ ZONE TO BVW 3. ABUTTER INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF SALEM ASW-cWRS AND GIS DATABASES MAP A LOT 246 ! � RIM=8.60_f�w� �� AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE N 1 WiW 4. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE j 7 / ` DETERMINED IN THE FIELD.BEFORE DESIGNING EXCAVATING,BLASTING,INSTALUNG,BACKFILUNG, ° - arW APPROX LOCATION 10' CIS 1 \ --d. ¢ WIDE GAS EASEMENT GRADING,PAVEMENT RESTORATION,REPAVING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION,ALL UTILITY COMPANIES ° �� ♦ / wi \ MUST BE NOTIFIED INCLUDING THOSE IN CONTROL OF UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.SEE r , Q `� / 1 / \ (PL UK 447 PLAN 77) CHAPTER 370,ACTS OF 1963,MASSACHUSETTS.CALL'DIG.SAFE'AT 1-888-344-7233.THE v g RIM=7.✓6 \�.. / ♦ V MORN-CALMRON GROUP.INC.ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A I w R • 1 G ��.;: ".. f• i"� RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN.BEFORE FUTURE CONNECTIONS THE e �7 y� �•,6,;:_, �' �_ucE I 'B- APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS MUST BE CONSULTED. >�> N !J / � � S � ELM .� I ./ wK�LL FEAST CORALS STREET l�f P y �6'h`L O \lei=8.53, `.. 1 )cu z r°n t ' / or 5. BY EXAMINATION OF THE CURRENTLY APPLICABLE FEMA FLOOD MAP THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN NAP 36,LOT 491 Ova gyp. ry,S.�. .. �P�� l`'[�,.. I 'A A ZONE AE(EL-10)AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP.CCINUNITY PANEL N0. o s TIMOTHY _ I an / I pLX,` I � ro� 25DO9CO417G WHICH BEARS AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY 16,2014. w° ram/ w _ 6. WETLAND RESOURCE AREAS WERE IDENTIFIED AND FLAGGED BY WETLANDS LAND MANAGEMENT, •: BIT.CONIC. � INC JULY,2015 AND LOCATED THE FIELD BY NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION IN V �IW ININ•', _ i'� Jl1LY,2015.TOP OF COASTAL BANK WAS CALCULATED BY OTHERS AND IS BASED ON GJ 1Q5��� f• / o ♦ �C` : \ I I PAVEMENT NSF ♦ w�" TOPOGRAPHY AND LOCATI OFON FETMA BASE FLOOD ELEVATION USING MASSDEP POLICY - 1 - 5/ ,� ::a::r•,:: y,. .:::..fN/Pr ! .-.,.. NEWS 33k, POWER C0. i FIGURE/4. 234 CO,NELL FAMILY IRREVOCABLE e' / 0 _J::1 I PROTECT EXIST. I BvxAg • /6 EAST TRUST LS STREET `\• 59i eP� \\ 1 tfle i' �.\ GAS MAIN 1 w w w MAP 34 LOT 249 i /�4 :•I--.:• \ w w �% � ` ��,♦ � �., � � `gip\ J6��w /i ,/ I� .,;.''`. I - _ �t\•.a°• y`' I I JI 7 {3 EAST 6 BORDERING VEGETATED C S WETLANDS(BUM)L BIT. YAPI18, O 27 PAVED ARE51L41b33 / _ S.F. PROP. .\ \� 1 1♦\��� ' d d s / WALL B1M'n'I L \\ - / :. - _ PROP.-TRASFI AND ej u A. °� PATIOg i'/ ` �9- -- \RECYCLING ENCLOSURE $ 81 m e 7 WARY E,NIGHT w 117 °B t F( EAST COINS STREET 1 - \ MAP A LOT 276 3 '1 \♦�7_--_ fix v�nIN / I 1019§506;PRESUMPTIVE LINE a L P� ♦ ,,i/�/i' ��� BANK(�)� `I•r, W\W (som � DS • _100'S A.lK TO TOP ,Fyy�dj,\.,+�' d / OF COASTAL BANK /:x` w W' wIW w`s-\ AIDS s I �/ �9' '�OTTCIM OF YAASTAL w .'+ /� 22-- - \ ; �G/w w w I GAWK(BOCB) w w W I = w���W999(AAALLL /• �W W W W�..^ - CH.91 FACLITY OF PUBLIC p1 ACCOLOOATION(EPA) p'L / N jl/ �TWW-M�� / ?/ FP CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS S 'W° ///% w w w w Ir w /��� w w w,�w•w ^� MEASURED FROM MHW L /�/ >'✓w w �fA_a,' .7� �� Ile L*/w wNy�I.�I = w �V •v / IP HEW ENGAN POWER CO. z w w w MAP A LOT 234 --_----- w -/ W-\+ - aEN A.a / w/% `I - --0'/•��.' w�j �- l CAROL A. S w w W w %jcA, -]j (�TKO 1 7 / MAP 30,LOT 273 ' ! R• =JD /' / z H. LLI COASTAL DINE ¢ W m Gf) En SALIDA MEAN HIGH WATER J= (ELEV=3.6)NAVD 8B APPRO% O Z K V cn MGz / 9 � / i W Q -CH.91 WATER DEPENDENT USE ZONE(WDUZ) N / 1 / / / / • ,' CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS `.`.`.����' \ MAS9)EP PRESUMPTIVE LINE / / /' / /'' / ' AVERWDUZ GE O.ANC AFRO VG.DISTANCE FROM MHW 70MHWARD TO LANDWARDLOT 8g LINEZ / , / / / =82.2'OFFSET MEASURED FROM MHW cV LL. ` / I ' LLd O I PLAN U Z ' T SCALE--1'=20' Q 0 10 20 40 V 6 C PROD.03500 i i L 1. L d. I . L L L