Loading...
7 CHERRY STREET - BUILDING JACKET I. 7 CRFRRV STR.F.F:T. � Certificate Number: B-2014-0558 Permit Number: B-2014-0558 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that the Multifamily 3+ Building located at Building Type ......7 CHERRYSTREET.............. in the City of Salem Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 7-9 CHERRY STREET UNIT 9-2 This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires ...............................Not Applicable unless sooner suspended or revoked. Eviration Date Issued On: Thursday, October 30, 2014 Certificate Number: B-2014-0558 Permit Number: B-2014-0558 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that the Multifamily 3+ Building located at Building Type 7 CHERRYSTREET in the City of Salem ............... ___.._. . _.,.,_.. Address Town/City Name y IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 7-9 CHERRY STREET UNIT 9-2 This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires ...............................Not Applicable._._,_._......... unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On: Thursday, October 30, 2014 Certificate Number: B-2014-0558 Permit Number: B-2014-0558 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that the Multifamily 3+ Building located at Building Type ...............--............7-CHERRTSTRE. E,T. , ........ in the City.(?f Salem.. ............. ........... Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 7-9 CHERRY STREET UNIT 9-2 This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires .......... --.--Aot.Applicable.__.,_..._................. unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On: Thursday, October 30, 2014 7 CHERRY STREET 537-14 isa: 9aoo COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS --- —- -- ".lap _ 134, ----�i Btock: CITY OF SALEM Lot 0114 T Category—:_ �R—EMODU Iernllt#- . 537-14 BUILDING PERMIT ,Project# JS-2014-001171 '. Est. Cost: $5,000.00 !Fee Charged: $59.00 Balance Due: Hoo PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: ;Const. Class: Contractor: License: Expires: Use Group _ RAYMOND JANISCH CONSTRUCTIO SUPERVISOR-CS089426 I.ot Size(sq. ft.): 5096.0844 Zoning: R3 Owner: KORSTVEDT AMY ANNE,NAZAIRE RUDY JnitsGained: - Applicant: RAYMOND.IANISCH itiltsLost: �.AT: 7 CHERRY STREET dig Safe# LSSUED ON. 14-Jan-2014 AMENDED ON. EXPIRES ON. 14-Jul-2014 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: COMBINE 2ND FLOOR&3RD FLOOR TO ONE UNYI' ..__._._. .. POST THIS CARD SOIT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET- .:�Vlectric Gas Plumbing Building (Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation: Servicer Meter: Footings: [tough: Rough: Rough:' (�i�� Foundation: r/� v Final: Final: Final: J `' Rough Frame: Fireplace/Chimney: 'D.P.W. Fire Health_ Insulation: Oil: Final: douse# Smoke: (Water: Alarm: ASS¢$$Or Treasury: Sewer: Sprinklers: Final: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOO RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount BUILDING RF.C-2014-001179 14-Jan-14 1526 $59.00 IMPOSTANT:OWNER OR CONTRACTOR IVIUST - - ARRANGE FOR PERIODIC INSPECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION.SEE CURRENT BUILDINGCODE CHAPTER 1 FOR LIST OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. - CALL 97&61cJ-5W.Td#CHEDULE AN INSPECTION !GeoT61S®2014 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. Certificate Number: B-2014-0558 Permit Number: B-2014-0558 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that the Multifamilyl.3+11 Building located at Building Type 7 CHERRYSTREET in the ..... ....... _...........City of Salem... ................. —.1-1-1.1.1--... ... _. _ ....... . . Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 7-9 CHERRY STREET UNIT 9-2 This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires _._-.._Not Applicable _ unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On: Thursday, October 30, 2014 a CITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT KIMRERLEY URISOOU MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON SII2EET♦SALEM,MASSACHLEETIS 01970 TEL:978-745.9595 ♦FAx:978-740-9846 REQUIRED INSPECTION 7-9 Cherry Street October 1, 2014 Rudy Nazaire 24 Evans Road Peabody,Massachusetts 01960 The above referenced property has come to the attention of this department for the following reason(s): Upon review of our Department's records the illegal apartment unit(Apartment#2, 7 Cherry Street) has not been brought into compliance in your(4) -unit building located in n R3 zoning district as directed in our Violation notice of 11/1812013 . You have applied,for and been granted the required permits to complete the corrective work. You have brought into compliance in Apartment #2 9 Cherry Street previously in violation. It is requested that you immediately contact this office to provide a schedule to complete the remaining work, this Department demands the life safety of the building be brought into compliance immediately. Failure to respond to this notification will be construed as non-compliance,and as such an Administrative Search Warrant will be sought, so as to allow the lawful inspection of this property. If you have any further questions regarding this letter,please call this office at (978)-619-5648. Sincerely, K. -- Michael Lutrzykowski Assistant Building Inspector COMMONWEALTH .OF MASSACHUSETTS NORTHEAST HOUSING COURT ,����✓� Plaintiff ' - V, 7 No. 133Y 2(4 � — Defendant AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE The undersigneA parties hereby agree to continue the above case to 30, 20�, 'at?:nO o'clock. Si ed .and da d y Plainti f Signe a dated by Defendant int y Defendant ' s Attorney T— 6hteHous SprcialisY Date ' PaCrick J. M�Donough COPIE (GIV N) MAILED) TO PARTIES ON COMMONWEALTH -OF MASSACHUSETTS NORTHEAST HOUSING COURT Plaintiff - V, - No. Defendant AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE k The undersigned gn parties hereby agree to continue the above case to ..ZD: 20f-C, atq:,07,01, o'clock. andt c Plaintiff Signe a ated by Defer an inti y e en ant' s Attorney f.�:Hcus' Specialist. Date Patrick J. McDonough COPIE < GIVEN) ILED) TO PARTIES ON a �7 a CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3RD FLOOR TEL: 978-745-9595 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAx: 978-740-9846 MAYOR THOMAS STYIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES/BUILDING COMMISSIONER Zoning Violation 07-09 Cherry Street November 6, 2013 r As a result of the inspection conducted by this office on Tuesday, November 12, 2013, it has been determined that you have created and have tenants occupying two (2) - illegal 3`d floor dwelling at 07-09 Cherry Street in violation of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance chapter 6-1. Currently you are permitted for four(4)—units in the building in a location zoned for(R-3) dwellings. This office has no records of permits for this construction and/or variance or special permit approvals for these third floor units. As discussed with you at the conclusion of our inspection at the site you are hereby ordered to secure permits for its removal or legal inclusion with the second floor apartment units within five (5) day of receiving this notice. You are hereby ordered to immediately contact this office upon receipt of this notice; failure to respond to this notification will be construed as non- compliance, with issuance of Municipal tickets and including the filing of criminal complaints at District Court. If you feel aggrieved by the Building Codes issues you have the right to appeal this order to the State Board of Building Regulations at One Ashburton Place, Boston, Ma. If you feel you are aggrieved by the Zoning decision of this order, your Appeal is to the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office. Michael Lutrzykowski i Assistant Building Inspector CITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY a DEPARTMENT KIbBERLEY DRISCOLL NIAYOR 120 WASI-UNGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSAQ-ILSE'M 01970 TEL 978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 REQUIRED INSPECTION 7-9 Cherry Street November 6,2013 Amy Anne Korstvedt Rudy Nazaire 24 Evans Road Peabody, Massachusetts 01960 The above referenced property has come to the attention of this department for the following reason(s): A report has been made to this office that there are illegal apartments units located in the attic and basement areas in this permitted two(4) -unit building in an R3 zoning district. For tris reason are inspection must be conducted by our office to assure compliance with the code and city ordinance. No permits have been applied for approved through this office for this work. Under the provisions of 780 CMR, Section 1 15.6, the State Building Code, access to this property must be granted for the purposes of this inspection. Please call this office upon receipt of this letter to schedule this required inspection. If this property has rental units, these tenants must be notified in advance of this inspection, so that access to these spaces may also be accomplished. This inspection shall be conducted on November 12, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.; failure to respond to this notification will be construed as non- compliance, and as such an Administrative Search Warrant will be sought, so as to allow the lawful inspection of this property. If you have any further questions regarding this letter, please call this office at (978)-745- 9595, extension 5648. Sincerely, Michael Lutrzykowski Assistant Building Inspector o+!�, CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTI* LF �ALEM, MA s2! BOARD OF APPEAL CLERh{'S OFFICE a « 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR I! 1F SALEM, MA 01970 TEL. (978) 745.9595 FAX (978) 740.9846 Z004 JUN STANLEY J. tJSOV(CZ, JR. 2 P 2 SL( MAYOR DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RUDY NAZAIRE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7-9 CHERRY STREET R-2 A hearing on this petition was held on May 19, 2004 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Richard Dionne, Bonnie Belair and Joseph Barbeau.. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to extend a non-conforming structure for the property located at 7-9 Cherry Street located in an R-2 Zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3 Q), which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after reviewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioner was granted a Special Permit in September of 1999 but was never acted on. 2. Attorney John Keilty represented the petitioner at the hearing. 3. The petitioner would like to extend his living space. 4. Councillor Matt Veno appeared and spoke in opposition to the petition with concerns of parking. changes to the structure and the current state of owner neglect evident from the street. 5. A number of neighbors appeared and spoke in opposition to the petition. � t CI( Y OF SALEM, MA CLERK'S OFFICE DECSION OF THE PETITION OF RUDY NAZAIRE REQUESTING?AVWI JL ffT. FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7-9 CHERRY STREET R-2 page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in harmony with the Neighborhood and will not promote the public health, safety, convenience and Welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 2 in favor and 2 in opposition to the motion to grant the relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a Special Permit is denied. Special Permit Denied May 19, 2004 l o eAa u.oarl JJJ A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the the City Clerk that 20 days have elapses and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal f �Ys=aF SAOFFICEa (fit of tzlpm, f` {ttssz11:4j gf5 e _ �Sottrb of '�v}reul mg11AY2l P 2: 10 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RUDY NAZAINE REQUESTING A VARIANCE/SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT7=9 CHERRY ;`STREE,T R_2� A hearing on this petition was held on May 19, 1999, with thefollowing Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Ronald Harrison, Stephen Buczko, Michael Ward and Ricbard,Dionrae,, Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and other and notices of the hearing were properly-published irtthe Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetfs Geral Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner requesting Variances to extend a non-conforming use to allow two additional dwelling units and relief from parking restrictions for the property located at 7- 9 Cherry Street. A motion was made to withdraw the Special Permit with ail in favor. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exit which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioner, Rudy Nazaire of 28 Becket Street, represented himself and was assisted by an architect, Robert Vorbach of Nashua, NH 2. William Kelley, Councillor of Ward 5, and Mary Wilbert, of 7 Cedar Street, a neighbor represented opposition to the petition, based mainly on the lack of parking in a congested area. Both spoke of the congested area and the lack of present parking for residents. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. ?� Y Ci t' OF SALEM. MA CL EFx'S OFFICE DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RUDY NAZAINE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7-9 CHERRY STREET R-2 page two 1959 mAY 2l P 2. 10 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not result in unnecessary hardship to the petitioner. 3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially hardship derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5 in opposition and 0 in favor to grant the requested variances. Having failed to gamer tfie four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is denied. VARIANCE DENIED May 19, 1999 Ronald Harrison, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH -I fIE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the Certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have passed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal CITY 0 , (9itV D{ ttlPm, tlsstttljuSP#t� CLER; ;FF, V( e Pnttrb of �Arpeal 1999 SEP �c� � 7• DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RUDY NAZAIRE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED'AT 7-9 CHERRY ST—REE TV`R-� �.}- � �� A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Ronald Harrison, Stephen Buczko, Stephen Harris,and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner requests a Special Permit to extend a non-conforming structure for the property located at 7-9 Cherry Street R2. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3 0), which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension of expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or stuctures in the same district. B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve Substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: OF CI R SAOFFICEA r, 4 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RUDY NAZAIRE REQUESTING15AP€C&L P 3: 32 PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7-9 CHERRY STREET R-2 page two 1. The petitioner, represented by Jack Keilty, Esq. Requested a Special Permit to extend the third-floor living area of his nonconforming four-family residence to allow him to office additional living space on the third floor to the tenants of the second-floor apartment. Plans submitted with the petition showed the proposed expanded height of the roofline, in addition to a proposed interior layout. 2. Petitioner stated that the newly created living space would become part of the existing apartment and would not create a new or separate dwelling unit. 3. There was no opposition to the proposed petition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows; 1. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 3. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, codes ordinances and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Zoning Enforcement Officer. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF RUDY NZAIRE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7-9 CHERRY STREET R-2 page three 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. Special Permit Granted September 15, 1999 Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that the 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal rn O r- T y w m3 w D N (111i#a of 1-94sollent, 4HUSSar4ustits �*���.� �Prtricxl �E�t�1r#mxzlf J�at�n I Qanbi Mire 3tuvertnr 44 `Edgette fit. $aieuc, Anse. 01970 0266 °e\rea Qlabe 617 745-6300 1996Rudy & Amy Nazaire 28 Beckett -Street Peabody, Ma . 01960 St.Dear Sir/Madam: An electrical inspection was ve address on December 19, 1996 at the request ofy, out of fear for he and his family' s safety. Mr. Harvey issued a complaint to this De- partment on November 12 , 1996 regarding wiring in the basement that was being installed by a non-licensed person. Mr. Harvey, also pointed out there was cross metering between his apartment and the landlords meter . Mr. Harvey was in fact correct on both of the above matters . Jeff Vaugh, Health Inspector witnessed the cross metering and Paul M. Tuttle , City Electrician and John J . Giardia Wire Inspector observed the illegal wiring in the basement that was used to light the common area in the basement. Fire Inspector , Norman LaPointe , also pointed out the fire alarm system was connected improperly and shall be remedied immediately. The basement lighting and the outside common lighting was controlled by a timer and the times the lights were coming on and shutting off were not found to be proper by either the health department standards or the electrical code standards . Be advised only a licensed personnel under the Mass . General Laws are permitted to do electrical work in a multiple occupied dwelling units . The agreement made on the same day with you , the health inspector and electrical inspector was in fact you would em- ploy a licensed electrician to remove illegal wiring and to install mo- tion sensor lights in the hallways . The basement lighting will also have to be rewired. Immediately you shall adjust the timer for the common lights to come on at 3 : 30PM daily and to shut off at no earlier than 7: 00AM daily. Your electrician shall also install a six circuit panel to control the fire alarm system. All work shall be completed within 14 days of this notice by a licensed electrician who shall apply for the necessary permits from this Department and from the Fire Prevention Department . Failure to comply will result in a District Court hearing . Yours truly , . rjo h,F izl" John J . Giardi ,Wire Inspector cc: Jeff VAUGHN ,HEALTH DEPT . ,NORMAN LAPOINTE , FIRE PREVENTION ; LEO TREMBLAY ,SLDG. INSPECTOR;MAYOR HARRINGTON ;ROBERT HARVEY ,TENANT g (IT � of iatert, fflttssarhusetts `� .�� '�tectrictt[ �epttrtment IIhll J.(1�IF11'�l Mire 3nsperfsr 44 tinAtte � t. ,�Alem, Attss. 01970 Area QInae 517 745-6300 JANUARY 13, 1997 RUDY & AMY NAZAIRE 28 BECKETT STREET PEABODY, MA. 0196 RE: 7-9 CHERRY ST. AR SIR/MADAM: WIRE INSPECTOR, JOHN J. GIARDI WAS CALLED BY MR. HAR- VEY/TENANT TO COME TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS ON JANUARY 9, 1997 BECAUSE SOMEONE WAS DOING ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A LI- CENSE WITHOUT A PERMIT. I MAKE REFERENCE TO THE FACT A NON LICENSED ELECTRICIAN WAS CAUGHT BY MYSELF AND SALEM POLICE OFFICER, SGT. GIFFORD, INSTALLING A MOTION SENSOR LIGHT IN THE DRIVEWAY. THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME A NON- LICENSED PERSON WAS DOING INFERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK ON THE SITE. ON DECEMBER 19 , 1996, I TOLD RUDY NAZAIRE, HE OR ANY UNLICENSED PERSON SHALL NOT PERFORM ANY ELECTRICAL WORK ON THE SITE. AT THIS TIME, PI]EASE BE ADVISED, VIOLATIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS AND THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES EXIST. THE ELECTRICAL WORK WAS PERFORMED IN THE BASEMENT/ COMMON LIGHTING WAS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 300 WIRING METHODS AND ARTICLE 240 OVERCURRENT PROTECTION. THERE IS THE POTENTIAL FOR A SERIOUS SITUATION AS A FIRE COULD RE- SULT IF THIS WIRING IS NOT CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY. THE WORK MUST BE COMPLETED WITH 7 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS LETTER. YOUR$ TRULY _c, . 7t�� v JOHN J. GIARDI WIRE INSPECTOR CC: JEFF VAUGH, HEALTH DEPT. ,NORMAN LAPOINTE, FIRE PRE- VENTION; LEO TREMBLAY, BLDG. INSP. ,MAYOR HARRINGTON; ROBERT HARVEY,TENANT CERTIFIED MAIL P30 5851856 - OWNER CERTIFIED MAIL P30 5851857 - TENANT �a g In of "ialem, ttss�trl�ix e## � � sa^ 'Iertrual department 31n4n A(Rarrbi Wirt Juspertar 44 'XdaUztte jot_ ,Salem, Anse. 01970 ,Area (gobe 517 745-6300 FEBRUARY 5, 1997 RUDY & AMY NAZAIRE 28 BECKETT STREET (, PEABOD, MASSACHUSETTS 01960 RE : C-7--9 CHERRY STREET i DEAR SIR/MADAM: PLEASE BE ADVISED, VIA VIOLA'P3-ONS--ON-L-ETTE5-DATED JANUARY 13, 1997 HAVE BEEN CORRECTED ACCORDING TO THE MASSACHUSETTS AND THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODES AND A AND A FINAL INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED ON JANUARY 14, 1997 . ONCE AGAIN,THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. aYOU S TRU Y, �lvr, JOHN,�' GIARDI WIRE INSPECTOR CC: NORMAN LAPOINTE, FIRE PREVENTION JEFF VAUGH, HEALTH DEPT. LEO TREMBLAY,BLDG. INSP. MAYOR HARRINGGTON ROBERT HARVEY, TENANT PMT/M /K 40 v�l�