The URL can be used to link to this page

0027 CHARTER STREET - BUILDING JACKET 27'CHARTER STREET NONOI T.,y Commonwealth of Massachusetts 1 City of Salem 0 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 ; P. CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION OFFICE OF: BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE OF APPROVAL: 10/24/2017 This is to certify that the installation of a/an Antennas authorized under B-2014 -0571 issued to EAST COAST COMMUNICATIONS or his/her authorized agent, located at 27 CHARTER STREET, Salem, MA 01810 has been completed and is in substantial compliance with the Massachusetts State Building Code. C4'W4N4� 10/24/2017 Chief Building Official Date To: EAST COAST COMMUNICATIONS POB571 GORHAM ME 04038 Final Construction Control Document I UT* To be submitted at completion of construction by a Registered Design Professional for work per the 8`h edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107 Project Title: MA3139 (NSB) Salem Common Date: October 5,2017 Property Address: 27 Charter Street, Salem,MA 01970 Project: Check(x) one or both as applicable: x New construction Existing Construction Project description: AT&T Wireless(NSB)Telecommunications site upgrade.Install AT&T antennas and RRUs- on existing roof. Install AT&T equipment shelter on steel platform on the roof. Reference Construction drawings dated 12/09/16, Structural Analysis dated 11/15/16. I Daniel P.Hamm,MA Registration Number: 40720,Expiration date: 6/30/18,am a registered design professional, and I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans,computations and specifications concerning: Architectural Structural Mechanical Fire Protection Electrical X Other Describe: Entire Project for the above named project. 1,or my designee,have performed the necessary professional services and was present at the construction site on a regular and periodic basis. To the best of my knowledge,information,and belief the work proceeded in accordance with the requirements of 780 CMR and the design documents approved as part of the building permit and that I or my designee: 1. Have reviewed, for conformance to this code and the design concept, shop drawings,samples and other submittals , by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Have performed the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17,as applicable. 3. Have been present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work was performed in a manner consistent with the construction documents and this code. Nothing in this document relieves the contractor of its responsibility regarding the provisions of 780 CMR 107. Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or 1"OF p electronic signature and seal: X90 o`er IE P. A ? m v tl � .40 0 Phone number: (978)557-5553 Hudson Design Group,LLC ��ss AL t87EP CONE� 1600 Osgood Lndg,Bldg 20N, Suite 3090 North Andover,MA 01845 Email: info@hudsondesigngroupllc.com Building Official Use Only Building Of Version 06 11 2013 IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR l O V✓\ 1 0I Zo TIME A.M. DATE P.M. M P�y �� OF /:^�V1 PHONE sob 8z1 - LOGO AREA COOE NUMBER EXTENSION ❑FAX ❑MOBILE AREA COBE NUMBER TIME TO CALL TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CAME TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH. RETURNED YDUR CALL WILL FAX TO YOU MESSAGE N(Z"IN b i S G1-1 N CJ71F o rJ Coe" C>E, /22-,Aj 1J Jy- TSy •-ok(L SIGNED , r-. U" 1= 0 IVERSAL. 48005 MAGE IN U.S.A. III 0 III Commonwealth of Massachusetts ` City of Salem 4 m m 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy k Permit No. B-2014-0571 PERMIT TO BUILD FEE PAID: $390.00 DATE ISSUED: 1/21/2014 This certifies that EAST COAST COMMUNICATIONS has permission to erect, alter, or demolish,a building _27-CHARTER STREET Map/Lot: 350272-0 as follows: Antennas INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS & RADIOS FOR CELL SERVICE TRANSMISSION. INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT SHELTER. NOTE: CHANGE OF CONTRACTORS 02/20/2014 { THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN EXTENDED FOR ANOTHER 180 DAYS AS OF 8/20/14 Contractor Name: 1 tt r DBA: Contractor License No: 1/21/2014 t Building Official Date This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this permit is commenced within six months after issuance.The Building Official may grant one or more extensions not to exceed six months each upon written request. 1 All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved application and the approved construction documents for which this permit has been granted. 1 All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structures shall be in compliance with the local zoning by-laws and codes. This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible from access street or road and shall be maintained open for public inspection for the entire duration of the work until the completion of the same. e The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable signatures by the Building and Fire Officials are provided oon'this permit. HIC#: "Persons contracting with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund"(as set forth in MGL c.142A). Restrictions: Commonwealth of Massachusetts 3 City of Salem a m 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy - Building plans are to be available on site. All Permit Cards are the property of the PROPERTY OWNER. t t f i i E Commonwealth of Massachusetts ' Citv of Salem 3 A 4 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy I ay Structure CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT ° PERMIT TO BE POSTED IN THE WINDOW ` Excavation Footing INSPECTION RECORD Foundation Framing Mechanical Insulation INSPECTION: ~T BY ~' DATE Chimney/Smoke Chamber Final 1 Plumbing/Gas Rough:Plumbing t r Rough:Gas Final r UElectrical Service i c Rough Final r t Fire Department j Preliminary t Fina I a � r `(� Health Department Preliminary Final 6/6/2016 XFINITY Connect XFINIFY Connect brothersunited@comcast.net +Font Size- FW: Minor Office Renovation:Carpeting From: Debra Tucker<dtucker@salemha.org> Thu,May 19,2016 12:53 PM Subject: FW: Minor Office Renovation: Carpeting To : Roger Tremblay(Brothersunited@comcast.net)<Brothersunited@comcast.net> Roger/Jennifer, Here is the carpet information for the Charter St. office renovation project. Thanks, Debbie Debra A. Tucker Assistant Executive Director Salem Housing Authority 27 Charter Street Salem, MA 01970 Tel: 978-744-4431 ext. 115 Fax: 978-744-9614 From: Debra Tucker��_______� Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 8:06 AM To: 'mike.corsetti@empiredocs.com'; paxorconstrucdon@gmail.com; belizairedesign@yahoo.com Subject: FW: Minor Office Renovation: Carpeting To all plan holders: A bidder has called and asked a question for specification information on the existing carpeting to be matched to the new area. Our records indicate that the black carpeting which was used as both the carpeting and the cove base and was installed in 2015 is: Durapoint Commercial Remington 20/26 book and the color is "Ebony". Should you have any questions, please let me know. Debbie Debra A. Tucker Assistant Executive Director Salem Housing Authority 27 Charter Street Salem, MA 01970 Tel: 978-744-4431 ext. 115 Fax: 978-744-9614 https://web.maiI.comcast.net/zimbrattVprintmessage?id=6372&tz=America/Ne YorkBxim=1 1/1 a -, o� Certificate NumHer: B-15-1053. Commonwealth City of This is to Certify that the ........... ....................... Gen Offle, .....................--......... Buildir 172 LA FA YE TTE STREET .............--........ ....................... ............---........... Address Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy Permit No. B-16-449 PERMIT TO BUILD FEE PAID: $110.00 DATE ISSUED: 5/6/2016 This certifies that SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY has permission to erect, alter, or demolish a building 27 CHARTER STREET Map/Lot: 350272-0 as follows: Repair/Replace MINOR OFFICE RESTORATIONS. (REMOVAL OF WALL, REPLACEMENT OF DOOR, CARPET & SMALL PORTION OF CEILING). Contractor Name: RUDY DIAMOND DBA: DIAMOND PAINTING Contractor License No: CS-074078 5/6/2016 Building Official Date This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this permit is commenced within six months after issuance.The Building Official may grant one or more extensions not to exceed six months each upon written request. All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved application and the approved construction documents for which this permit has been granted. All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structures shall be in compliance with the local zoning by-laws and codes. This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible from access street or road and shall be maintained open for public inspection for the entire duration of the work until the completion of the same. The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable signatures by the Building and Fire Officials are provided on this permit. HIC#: 179375 "Persons contracting with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund"(as set forth in MGL c.142A). Restrictions: Building plans are to be available on site. All Permit Cards are the property of the PROPERTY OWNER. Commonwealth of Massachusetts 3 Citv of Salem 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 25641 Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy Structure CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT ° Excavation PERMIT TO BE POSTED IN THE WINDOW s Footing INSPECTION RECORD Foundation Framing Mechanical Insulation INSPECTION: BY DATE Chimney/Smoke Chamber Final +I Plumbing/Gas Rough:Plumbing Rough:Gas Final Electrical Service Rough Final Fire Department Preliminary Final 0 Health Department Preliminary Final a 3S The Commonwealth of Massachusetts` Department of Public Safety REC IVED Cr Massachusetts State Budding Code(780CM'I�SPEC,TI AL SERVICES Building Permit Application for any Building other than a One-or Two-Family Dwelling (This Section For Official Use Only) Building Permit Number: Date Applied: Budding.Official: ' SECTION 1:LOCATION(Please indicate Block#and Lot#for locations for which a street address is not available) a 7 �2A&,J;e k No.and Street City/Town Zip Code Name of Building(if applicable) SECTION 1 PROPOSED WORK. 11 1 Edition of MA State Code used_ If New Construction check here❑or check all that apply in the two rows below Existing Building❑ Repair❑ 1 Alteration ❑ 1 Addition❑ 1 Demolition ❑ (Please fill out and submit Appendix 1) Change of Use ❑ Change of Occupancy ❑ Other ❑ Specify: Are building plans and/or construction documents being supplied as part of this permit application? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is an Independent Structural Engineering Peer Review requi d? Yes ❑ No ❑ ?BIADescription of P opose d Work: io / ''en's S>� / N SECTION 3:COMPLETE THIS SECTION IF EXISTING BUILDING UNDERGOING RENOVATION,ADDITION,OR CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY Check here if an Existing Building Investigation and Evaluation is enclosed(See 780 CMR 34) ❑ Existing Use Group(s): IProposed Use Group(s): SECTION 4:BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA Existing Proposed No.of Floors/Stories(include basement levels)&Area Per Fluor(sq. ft.) Total Area(sq.ft.)and Total Height(ft.) SECTION 5:USE GROUP(Check as applicable) A: Assembly A-1❑ A-2❑ Nightclub ❑ A-3 ❑ T4❑ A-5❑ B: Business ❑ E: Educational ❑ F: Facto F-1❑ F2❑ H: Hi h Hazard H-1 11H-2❑ H-3 13H-4❑ H-5 13I: Institutional 1-1 ❑ 1-2❑ 1-3 C314 C3M: Mercantile❑ R: Residential R-10 R-2❑ R-3❑ R-4❑ S: Storage S-1 ❑ S-2❑ U: Utility❑ Special Use❑and please describe below: Special Use: SECTION 6:CONSTRUCTION TYPE(Check as applicable) IA 13 111 IIA E3 IIB E3 IIIA 13 IIIB ❑ I IV ❑ VA V13 13 SECTION 7:SITE INFORMATION(refer to 780 CMR 111.0 for details on each item) Permit: Debris Removal: Water Supply: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal: Trench PermLicensed Disposal Site❑ Public 11 Check if outside Flood Zone 11 Indicate municipal C3os A trench will not be P s required❑or trench or specify: Private 11 or indentify Zone: or on site system❑ permit is enclosed❑ Railroad right-of-way: Hazards to Air Navigation: LIQ I.Int ri,� nnu------ it,..g�.y_i nk,s: Not Applicable❑ Is Structure within airport approach area? Is their review completed? or Consent to Build enclosed❑ Yes❑ or No❑ Yes❑ No ❑ SECTION 8:CONTENT OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Edition of Code: Use Group(s): - Type of Construction: Occupant Load per Floor: Dues the building contain an Sprinkler System?: Special Stipulations: SECTION 9: PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION - Name and Address of Property Owner -t 254le Geos Nw "K4 Name(Print) No.and Street City/Town Zip Pr perry Owner Cont ct Information: p i A�Dw ^1 918-ivy- 'y3 17Pgzs izsl 61ALC�DkQrV& - '--f E - YAu j' Telephone No. (business) Telephone No. (cell) e-mail address able, the property owner hereby authorizes Tll C�� a7 f.,�PoC FEZ -57 541x: -� 0-4 Q1970 Neuse Street Address City/Town State Zip the ro er owner's behalf,in a6 matters relative to work authorized b this buildin ermit a lication. SECTION 10:CONSTRUCTION CONTROL(Please fill out Append&2)u0din is less than 35,000 cu.ft.of enclosed space and/or not under Construction Control then check hem O and skip Section 10.1 10.1 Registered Professional Responsible for Construction Control AoN4Cs 9f7 —obi a;,,eAddress (Registrant) Telephone No. efin is address w Registration Number City/Town State Zip Discipline Expiration Date AO f Q,- 41 oc t 9,C 10.2 General Contractor - - - - Company Name , �kgr f -7\)�tdn O�I� C-' Name of P r on Responsible for Construction License No. and Type if Applicable Street Addr^esss�q �/�(� City/_own Stade Zip Telephone No. business Telephone No. cell e-mail address SECTION 11:WORKERS'COMPI;NSA'I ION INSDRANC M—FFIDAVI'r M.G.L.c.152§25C(6)) A Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of Industrial Accidents must be completed and submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit. Is a signed Affidavit submitted with this application? Yes❑ No O SECTION 12:CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PERMIT FEE - Item Estimated Costs:(Labor and Materials) Total Construction Cost(from Item 6)_$ 1. Building $ Building Permit Fee=Total Construction Cost x—(Insert here 2.Electrical $ appropriate municipal factor)_$ 3. Plumbing $ Note:Minimum fee=$ contact municipality) d.Mechanical ([-NAC) $ ( ,/J h 5. Mechanical Other $ Enclose check payable to �// ()Z C/LTJ 6.Total Cost $ /p 90a (contact municipality)and write check number here SECTION 13:SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT By entering my name below,I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledgeand understanding. Please print and sign name Title Telephone No. Date Street Address City/Town State Zip Municipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval: �'d vf,Pfr 3 l/ Name Date � �� f�L61Mt�xp.'l( Z3� Ic S�a, MfaOZly� SECTION 4 PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION ' Name and Address of Property Owner " I lam, ti6�s Ng_ A #-4 A' Name(Print) No.and Street City/Town Zi Pr per Owner Contact Information: - P �7L /�1Qc6D�v�l 918.7�1y 414V3 97ryzs �Z?9 C LL Titley;' < ra. a"4,� AGC�T1M/ ry® SQIFr+n'A X012 (a t J.Ijt Telephone No.(business) Telephone No. (cell) If aIppl�icabhe,the property owner hereby authorizes ) P ( ) e-mail address Name Street Address City/Town State Zip to act on the ro er owner's behalf,in a6 matters relative to work authorized by this buildin ermit a lication. . ' SECTION IO:COIYSTR ICTIONCONTROI(PleasefilloufAppendiai2) f.build in is less than 95,000 cu.k.o(encloseds ce and or not under.0onstructirin Conhol then cliec)c here 11 andskiSection 10.1 - 10.1 Re 'stered Nofessional R "esonsible for Construction.Control ' - - 1 fC 9I7 -AL- am egistrant) Telephone No. e-mail address q - _ . - Registration Number ( e Address City/Town - State Zip Discipline Expvation Date 10.2 General Co tractor ` - - l t u Company Name F �t �r�f IAt�dL( � C3—e22 10 ;? N e of P r on Responsible for Construction License No. and T if Applicable Street Address - a.,h' o ._g" mje'• Zi—p?Gr f Tele hone No. usiness Tele hone No. cell e-mail address ' .SECTION 11:61'DRhtt,, COP1PEN5A'176N IINSORaVCE.AFFIDAVff(M G.G.c.152:A 250611 A Workers'Compensation insurance Affidavit from the bIA Department of Industrial Accidents must be completedand submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit. Is a si ned Affidavit.submitted with this application? Yes O No SECTION 12:.C6NSTRUCTION COSTS AND PERMIT FEE _ Item Estimated Costs:(Labor , and Materials) Total Construction Cost(from Item 6)=$ -1. Building � $ - 2. Electrical $ Building Permit Fee=Total Construction Cost x (Insert here 3. Plumbing $ - appropriate municipal factor)=$ - 4.Mechanical (HVAC) $ Note:Minimum fee=$ (contact municipality) 5.Mechanical Other $ 6.Total CostEnclose check payable to $ ! !O i (Contact municipality)and v rile check number here SECTION 13:SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERMIT-APPLICAiV3"'""""°°°"'"^` - - By entering my name below,I hereby attest under the pains and'penalties of perjury that all of theinformation contained in this - application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.and understanding. - ` Please print and sign name - Title — — - Telephone No. - Date Street Address - City/Town State ` Zip _ Municipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval: •✓3t02rm y,Q7r 3/ _ Name Date Z 46 f" e �zL61 cs� xp ( 23 P"'R"l r 07'Y OF SALEA AWSAaA SETPS Bt LmcDEPAimff r 120 WA2M4WMS7RW,3mDRDM 7kL(978)745-9595. PAX(978)740.9846 %A�ERiBYDRIS�II. MAYOR DeWASSrJUM Construction Debris Disposa/Afdavit (required for all demolition and,renovation workf In accordance with the sixth edition of the State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 111.5 Debris, and the provisions of MGL M,S 54; Building Permit g is issued with the condition that the debris resulting from this work shall be disposed of in a properly licensed waste deposit facility as defined by MGL c 111, S 15oA. The debris ill be transported by. (name of hauler) The debris will be disposed of in: ST TL HOZ/Y (name of facility) .17 (address of facility) 0 l 7b o Signature of applicant I-A? /% Date May 03 16 12:20p Village Insurance Agency 617-500-9944 p.1 ACORDTM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OATE(MMIDD fYI 5/3/2016 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Village Insurance Agency, Inc. HOLDER, AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE O LDER, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 37 Harvard Street ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Brooldine,MA 02445 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURES — '-- INSURER n: Safety Insurance CO nirparry Diamond Painting&Contracting, IIIc INSURER a Travelers P&C Company of America P.O. Box 191100 INSURER c Roxbury, MA 02120 IINSURER D. INSURER E COVERAGES THE COVERAGES OF INSLARANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED 0 LAKY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEIREP1 IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAM TYPE O F IN SU RANCE POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY EACHOCCURRENCE $LOOO,000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY FIREOAMAGE(AM.fir9) $SO,000 ,CLAIMS MADE � OCCVR MED EXP(anyone pe,mn} $5,000 A SMA0021736 4/22/2017 4/22/18 PERSONAL ADV INJURY $I,ODO.DOO GENERAL AGGREGATE $2.OD�.�D GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMB APSES PE PRODUCTS-CCYPOPAGG $2,000000 PR0. POLICY , LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMB ANY AUTO (E9 a<CbOPq ALLOWNEDAUTOS i BODILY INJURY SCHEWLEDAUTOS (Po,Petyn] $500.000 A HIRED Auras 8646T17 7/15/2015 7/15/2016 BDDRYW.wrrr $500,000 IVOIJAWNED AUTOS i (P«r.We16 PROPERTY DAMAGE $500.000 (PBr.LU IY) I I GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT ANYAUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC AUTO ONLY AGO EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE JOCCJR CLANS MADE AO Nt�ATE DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION WORKERS COMPENSATION AND We OT6 EMPIAYER5 LLIOILRY TORYUMTI EA 8 715JUB-207666-615 6/26/2015 6/26/2016 E.L.IN ACCIDENT $500AO0 00 E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYE 5500 IX}0 E DISEASE-POLICY LIMB 55000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OFOPERATONSILOCATIONSNEHICLE XCLUSMNS ADDED BY ENDORSMENT6PECML PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE HOLDER X JADDITIONALINSURSO CANCELLATION SNOULDANYOFTHEABOVE DESCRIED POLICES BECAIKELEOSEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,TRE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE MOLDER NAMED TO TIS LEFT BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMP OSE N O OB UGATION OR UABNJTY OF NWD UPON E INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR REPR£SENTA— AUTHORREOREP S TATNE I _ ACORD 25S(7197) ACORD CORPORATION 2005 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department oflndustrialAccidents 1 Congress Street,Suite 100 Boston,MA 02114-2017 UV www.massgov/dia Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit:Builders/Contractors/Electricians/Plumbers. TO BE FH.ED WITH THE PERK MING AUTHTI ORY. A licantlnformation Please Print Le 'b lv Name(Bwiness/Orgamntiontlndividuaty y Address:,Fzx/_n r it City/State/Zip• Ci Phone#:-(,2 Are you an employer?Chic appropriate box: Type of project(required): ;1.X1 am a employer employees(fWl and/orpart-trine).• 7. New construction 2.Q 1 am a sole prdpnemr or partnership and have no any capacity.[No workers'Comp.insurance required)1 working forme m 8. E]Remodeling 3.❑1 am a homeowner doing all work myself.[No workers'comp,insurance required.)1 9. ❑Demolition 4.❑1 am a homeowner and will be hiring contractors to conduct all work on my property, I will 10 Q Building addition ensure that all contractors either have workers'compensation mumance or ore sole I LE]Electrical repairs or additions proprietors with no employees. 12.0 Plumbing repairs or additions 5.❑ISM a general contractor and I have hired the sub-commctms listed on the attached sheet. These sub-contractors have employees and have workm'comp.insmmce.r 13.❑Roof repairs 6.❑We are a corporation and its officers have exercised their right of exemption par MGL c. 14.0 Other 152,§1(4).and we have no employees.[No workers'comp.insurance requhed) *Any applicant that checks box#1 must also Iill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. t Homeowners who submit this of davit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside coalractms must submit a new affidavit indicating such. lConbactors that check this box must attached an additional sheet showing the name of the sub-coutractors and state whether or not those entities have employees. If the sub=contractors have employees,they most provide then workers'comp,policymmmber. I am an employer that is providing workers'compensation insurance for my employees. Below is thepolicy and job she information. Insurance Company Name: Policy#or Self-ins.Lic.#: Expiration Date: Job Site Address:_ 6 City/StateiZip: Attach a copy of the work rs'compen ' n policy dec are on page(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under MGL c. 152,§25A is a criminal violation punishable by a tine up to$1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment,as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator.A copy of this statement may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. Ido hereby certify under the pains and penalties ofperjury that the information provided above is true and correct Signature: Date Phone#: F only. Do not write in this area,to be completed by city or town ofcialn• Permit/License# ority(circle one): ealth 2.Building Department 3.City/Town Clerk 4.Electrical Inspector 5.Plumbing Inspector son• Phone#: Information and Instructions Massachusetts General Laws chapter 152 requires all employers to provide workers'compensation for their employees. Pursuant to this statute,an employee is defined as"...every person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied,oral or written." An employer is defined as"an individual,partnership,association,corporation or other legal entity,or any two or more of the foregoing engaged in a joint enterprise,and including the legal representatives of a deceased employer,or the receiver or trustee of an individual,partnership,association or other legal entity,employing employees. However the owner of a dwelling house having not more then three apartments and who resides therein,or the occupant of the dwelling house of another who employs persons to do maintenance,construction or repair work on such dwelling house or on the grounds or building appurtenant thereto shall not because of such employment be deemed to be an employer." MGL chapter 152,§25C(6)also states that"every state or local licensing agency shall withhold the issuance or renewal of a license or permit to operate a business or to construct buildings in the commonwealth for any applicant who has not produced acceptable evidence of compliance with the insurance coverage required." Additionally,MGL chapter 152,§25C(7)states"Neither the commonwealth nor any of its political subdivisions shall enter into any contract for the performance of public work until acceptable evidence of compliance with the insurance requirements of this chapter have been presented to the contracting authority." Applicants Please fill out the workers'compensation affidavit completely,by checking the boxes that apply to your situation and,if necessary,supply sub-contractor(s)name(s),address(es)and phone number(s)along with their certificate(s)of insurance. Limited Liability Companies(LLC)or Limited Liability Partnerships(LLP)with no employees other than the members or partners,are not required to carry workers'compensation insurance. If an LLC or LLP does have employees,a policy is required. Be advised that this affidavit may be submitted to the Department of Industrial Accidents for confirmation of insurance coverage. Also be sure to sign and date the affidavit. The affidavit should be returned to the city or town that the application for the permit or license is being requested,not the Department of Industrial Accidents. Should you have any questions regarding the law or if you are required to obtain a workers' compensation policy,please call the Department at the number listed below. Self-insured companies should enter their self-insurance license number on the appropriate line. City or Town Officials Please be sure that the affidavit is complete and printed legibly. The Department has provided a space at the bottom of the affidavit for you to fill out in the event the Office of Investigations has to contact you regarding the applicant. Please be sure to fill in the permit/license number which will be used as a reference number. In addition,an applicant that must submit multiple permittlicense applications in any given year,need only submit one affidavit indicating current policy information(if necessary)and under"Job Site Address"the applicant should write"all locations in (city or town)."A copy of the affidavit that has been officially stamped or marked by the city or town may be provided to the applicant as proof that a valid affidavit is on file for future permits or licenses. A new affidavit must be filled out each year.Where a home owner or citizen is obtaining a license or permit not related to any business or commercial venture (i.e.a dog license or permit to burn leaves etc.)said person is NOT required to complete this affidavit. The Department's address,telephone and fax number: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents I Congress Street, Suite 100 Boston,MA 02114-2017 Tel. #617-727-4900 ext. 7406 or 1-877-MASSAFE Fax#617-727-7749 Revised 02-23-15 www.mass.gov/dia NANEPASHEMET PROJECT MANAGEMENT i RYAN NESTOR PROJECT MANAGER 0 ! } 328 WEST SHORE DRIVE SUITE IA MARBLEHEAD,MA o1945 781-632-0265 RHES OR@NANEPASHEMET.COM NW W.NANEPASHEMET.COM STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT For MA3139S SALEM COMMON 27 Charter Street Salem,MA 01970 New Equipment Shelter on the Roof; Fagade Mounted Antennas _ J A Prepared for. Cc< Pinnacle dt&t Wireless Dated:August 20,2013 ZN OFIgq o DANIEL P. yc Prepared by: 'y HA M No. 17 A Huldson s ST Design GroupuC 1600 Osgood Street Building 20 North, Suite 3090 North Andover, MA 01845 Phone: (978) 557-5553 f www.hudsondesiangrour)llc.com Hudson© Design Group= O SCOPE OF WORK: Hudson Design Group LLC (HDG) has been authorized by AT&T to conduct a structural evaluation of the structure supporting the proposed AT&T equipment located in the areas depicted in the latest HDG drawings. This report represents this office's findings, conclusions and recommendations pertaining to the support of AT&T's proposed equipment. This office conducted an on-site visual survey of the above areas on July 23, 2013. Attendees included Rob Hams (HDG-Field Technician). CONCLUSION SUMMARY: Building Plans prepared by Robert Charles Associates Inc., dated January 8, 1973 were available and obtained for our reference. A limited visual survey of the structure was completed in or near the areas of the proposed work. Based on our evaluation, we have determined that the existing structure IS CAPABLE of supporting the proposed AT&T equipment within or near the proposed locations. A summary of the proposed support types and attachment locations are as follows: (12) Antennas (SBNH-1D6565C) (96.4"x11.9"x7.1" - Wt. 60.8 lbs. /each)(4 per sector)...Mounted on new mounts secured to the building facade. (4) Surge Arrestors (2 per Alpha and Beta Sectors)...Mounted on new ballasted frames composed of unistrut components. (2) Surge Arrestors(Gamma Sector)...Mounted on the new equipment support platform. (10) RRH's(Wt. =50 lbs. /ea.)(5 per Alpha and Beta Sectors)...Mounted on new ballasted frames composed of unistrut components. (5) RRH's (Wt. = 50 lbs. /ea.)(Gamma Sector)...Mounted on new ballasted frames composed of unistrut components. (1) Diesel Generator(Wt.=5,500 lbs.)...Supported by a new steel frame on the roof located over the building columns. (1) Equipment Shelter (Wt. = 20,250 Ibs.)...Supported by a new steel frame on the roof located over the building columns (see the attached equipment shelter specification sheets). Equipment Design Load= 11,000lbs. Referenced documents are attached. 2 Hudson Design Groupuc DESIGN CRITERIA: 1. Massachusetts State Building code latest edition, International Building Code (IBC) 2009, and ASCE 7-05. 2. Wind Analysis: Reference Wind Speed: 110 MPH (780CMR 1604.10) Category: B (ASCE 7-05 Table 1.1) Gust Effect Factor (G): 0.85 (ASCE 7-05 6.5.8) Force Coefficient (Cf): Varies (ASCE 7-05 Fig. 6-21) F=qz* G* Cf* Af: Reference ASCE 7-05 Equation 6-28 Snow Loading: Basic Ground Snow Load: 45 psf (780CMR 1604.10) Flat Roof Snow Load: 31.5 psf (780CMR 1604.10) 3. HAMA -222- G Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures County: Essex Wind Load: 110 mph 4. Approximate height above grade to the center of the antennas: 110'-0"+/- 3 Ord Hudsonv,wj) Design Groupuc O EXISTING ROOF CONSTRUCTION: The roof system consists of a roofing membrane over rigid insulation on cast-in-place steel reinforced concrete deck,supported by reinforced concrete beams and columns. ANTENNA SUPPORT RECOMMENDATIONS: The new antennas are proposed to be installed on 2.5" Std. )2.875" O.D.) 8'-0" long supported by new mounts secured to the building fagade using 1/2" 0 Hilti HY20 epoxy anchors embedded a minimum of 2". RRH'S /SURGE ARRESTOR SUPPORT RECOMMENDATIONS: • The new Alpha and Beta sector RRH's and surge arrestors are proposed to be mounted on new steel frames made up of unistrut components secured to concrete filled sleepers on the roof. • The new Gamma sector RRH's and surge arrestors are proposed to be mounted on the new equipment steel frame. EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND GENERATOR SUPPORT RECOMMENDATIONS: The new equipment shelter and generator are proposed to be supported by a new steel frame on the roof supported by the steel reinforced concrete building columns. Limitations and Assumptions: h--Reference the latest HDG drawings for all equipment locations and details. 2. Mount all,equipment per manufacturer's specifications. 3. HDG is not\ponsible for any modifications completed prior to and hereafter which HDG was not directly involved. 4. All structural members and their connections are assumed to be in good condition and are free from defects with no deterioration to its member capacities. 5. If field conditions differ from what is assumed in this report, then the engineer of record is to be notified as soon as possible. 6. All detail requirements will be designed and furnished in the construction drawings. 4 H _ ' �� G , � . . ,� ,• E� ,� �� d *t _ �� y ��, a e =3 aT�� l h ,?Fy �'`��9 ^ f S 3 4�^b"5�., .:�� s' � 4 r:.'� � Fri"', ta�3: �' J j I "t � � � 'b +L �` �� h r T y z, f ♦ti. — .,F�M � �' r _ � K C � �� ^t •� �y µ`};Vi` �'�.� _ _ a. •: �� S.. +y t � ' i� �- r i. J r �. ?! i � � 1 A � � pE kjwDHudso Design Groupuc Antenna Calculations 6 Date: 08-16-13 Project Name:Salem Common Project Number: MA31 Ch Hudson Designed By: AA Checked By:MSC D Design GroupucO 2.6.5.2 Velocity Pressure Coeff: K,=2.01(z/zg)zI° z= + 110 (ft) zg 1200 (ft) K: 1.016 a Y 7 Kzmin 5 Kz 5 2.01 Table 2-4 Exposure Zg a Kaman Ke B 1200 ft 7 0.70 0.90 C 900 ft 9.5 0.85 1 D 700 ft 11.5 1.03 1.10 2.6.6.4 Topographic Factor: Table 2-5 Topo.Category Kt f 2 0.43 1.25 3 0.53 2 4 0.72 1.5 Kzt= (1+(Ke KdKh))z Kh=e It alH) Kn= #DIV/01 Kh= #DIV/0! Ke= 0.9 (from Table 2-4) (If Category 1 then Ku=1.0 Kt= 0 (from Table 2-5) f= 0 (from Table 2-5) Category= 1 z= 110 H= 0 (Ht.of the crest above surrounding terrain) K., 1.00 Date: 08-16-13 Project Name:Salem Common Hudson Project Number: MA3139S Design Groupue D Designed By: AA Checked By:MSC 2.6.7 Gust Effect Factors 2.6.7.1 Self Supporting Lattice Structures Gh= 1.0 Latticed Structures>600 ft Gh=0.85 Latticed Structures 450 ft or less Gh=0.85+0.15 [h/150-3.0] h=ht.of structure h= 110 4r Gh 0.51 2.6.7.2 Guyed Masts Gh -;!M 0.85 2.6.7.3 Pole Structures N Gh~ 2.6.7.4 Structures Supported on Other Structures (Contilivered tubular or latticed spines,pole,structures on buildings(ht. :width ratio>5) Gh=r.7 =f 1.35 Gh= 1.35 Date: 08-16-13 Project Name:Salem Common H Project Number: MA3139S Hudson V-44 Designed By: AA Checked By:MSC Design Group BZ > 2.6.8 Design Ice Thickness: ti, 2.0*tj*l*Kj,*(Krt)"" t;= ti, Ki�= 2.26 1.13 Kzt= Ki, [z/33]0"0:9 1.4 r,7.. 77 -, —�` 1.13 Calculating the weight of ice,the cross-sectional area of ice shall be determined by: Ai,=TE*%*(Dc+tj Dc= 96.4 (in)Largest Dim of Member rsy Au 699.18 2.6.9 Design Wind Load: F= qz*Gh*(EPA's) q,= 0.00256*Kz*Krt*Kd*Vmu 2 K�= 1.016 Kzt= q,= 29.88 Kd= 0.95 Vmax= 110 Table 2-2 Structure Type Wind Direction Probability Factor,Kd Latticed structures with triangular, square or rectangular cross sections 0.85 Tubular pole structures, latticed structures with other cross sections, 0.95 lappurtenances. Date: 08-16-13 Project Name:Salem Common Hudson Project Number: MA3139S Design Group D Designed By: AA Checked By:MSC Determine Cf: If lattice Structure See Manual If Tubular Pole Structure, Use Corrected Value from Table 2.7 Below C Round 18 Sided 16 Sided 12 Sided 8 Sided mph.ft <32 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 (Subcritical) 32 to 64 38.4/C1.0 25.8/C°'885 12.6/C""' 2.99/Coz11 1.2 (Transitional) >64 0.6 0.65 0.75 1 1.2 (Supercritical) Dip=Outside Diameter or Out to Out: 0.2 feet C=.`" - 2217 Cf= 1.2 Appurtenances Heieht Width Depth Flat Area Force Per Aopurtenance (P)Antenna 96.4 :11.9 7.1':«r,":i 7.97 j 385.67 (Ibs) Item No.2 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 (Ibs) Item No.3 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 (Ibs) t Item N0.4 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 (Ibs) Item No.S 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 (Ibs) TOTAL FORCE(FFA)= 385.67 (Ibs) 10 Project:MA 3139-Salem Common "ga Andres o Location:Proposed Antenna MountingPipe Pe Hudson Design Group LLC Multi-Loaded Multi-Span Beam 1600 Osgood Street,Suite 3090,Bldg.20N (2009 International Building Code(AISC 13th Ed ASD)] North Andover,MA 01845 or Pipe 3 Std.x 9.0 FT(0.8+1.7+6.6)/ASTM A53-GR.B Section Adequate By:248.6% StruCalc Version 8.0.113.0 9/13/2013 2:18:02 PM Controlling Factor:Deflection LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Lsft er Right Live Load 0.00 IN 2U6106 0.00 IN U7931 0.13 IN 201254 Dead Load 0.00 in 0.00 in 0.05 in Total Load 0.00 IN 204906 0.00 IN 06393 0.18 IN 20900 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:U240 REACTIONS A B Live Load 404 Ib 790 Ib Dead Load -85 Ib 154 Ib Total Load -85 Ib 944 Ib Uplift(1.5 F.S) -490 Ib 0 Ib Bearing Length 0.00 in 0.40 in BEAM DATA Lift enter Rm lo.f .67 ft Span Length 0.75 it 1.67 ft 6.58 it Unbraced Length-Top 0.75 ft 1.67 it 6.58 it Unbraced length-Bottom 0.75 R 1.67 it 6.58 it UNIFORM LOADS Lgg Cents 89hl STEEL PROPERTIES Uniform Live Load 0 plf 0 plf 0 pif Pipe 3 Std.-A53-GR.B Uniform Dead Load 0 p8 0 pit 0 plf Beam Self Weight 8 pK 8 plf 8 pif Properties: Total Uniform Load 8 pif 8 plf 8 plf Steel Yield Strength: Fy= 35 ksi POINT LOADS-RIGHT SPAN Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 ksi Load Number QL Tube Steel Section(X Axis): dx= 3.5 in Live Load 386 Ib Tube Steel Section(Y Axis): dy= 3.5 in Dead Load 0 Ib Tube Steel Wall Thickness: t= 0.201 in Location 1.75 it Area: A= 2.08 m2 Moment of Inertia(X Axis): Ix= 2.85 in4 Section Modulus(X Axis): Sx= 1.63 in3 Plastic Section Modulus: Z= 2.19 in3 Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Flange Buckling Ratio: FBR= 17.41 Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 58 Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio non-compact:AFBR_NC= 256.86 Nominal Flexural Strength w/Safety Factor: Mn= 3825 ft-Ib Controlling Equation: F8-1 Shear Buckling Stress Coefficient Eqn.G6-2a: Fu= 21 ksi Nominal Shear Strength w/Safety Factor: Vn= 13078 Ib Controlling Moment: -840 ft-Ib 1.67 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s)1,2,3 Controlling Shear: -508 Ib 2.0 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s Comparisons with required sections: Redd Provided Moment of Inertia(deflection): 0.82 in4 2.85 in,; Moment: -840 ft-Ib 3825 ft-Ib Shear: -5081b 13078 lb NOTES II ICE WEIGHT CALCULATIONS Project: MA3139S Thickness of ice: 0.75 Weight of ice based on total radial SF area: Antenna Depth(in): 7.1 height(in): 96.4 Width(in): 11.9 Total weight of ice on object: 89 pounds ice Weight of object: 61 pounds lCombined weight of ice and object: 150 pounds Per foot weight of ice: Pipe pipe weight per foot: 7.58 pipe length(ft): 9 diameter(in): 3.5 Per foot weight of ice on object: 3 pounds ice/ft Total weight of ice on object: 29 pounds Total weight of pipe: 68.22 pounds lCombined weight of pipe and ice: 97 pounds * Density of ice used=56 PCF JTotal Weight: 247 pounds DATE: 0 9 -16-1 3 Project Name: SALEM COMMMOAI i�l !]OOD Project No.: A 31345 uuuds®Design Group Design By: Arg Chk'd By: MSC Page_of • GNELK A-TEAINA MOUAlr CoAl vEC7TbAj_5 - V1E�E2r.iCE' NILTZ A�NESSvE A✓-CNORI,v,6 SySTEA�$, USE (2) 1/2° 0 MlN NrT-Ny150 (F'C = ZOOO PSl ) 2- %y' EM1UDME.A.T MI,ti►) tT = 13$5 Lbs/ANCjlo& j �V - 2750 LbLS 1AAAft4QR WORSE C45E RFACTZo,j wLN7j ('5;&F7 STRUCALC S•v£ETl { - -7qo Lbs. y 3q5 Lbs./Avcp02 < 1395 LbS/ANChok o. K[ Z AAAC(yORS Co AAvLTj' W/9D5 (SEE ICF l EZL/9T c4Lcu-,; S,ov� 2 4-7 Lbs/2 SO pp4prS - 113-5 L6S. 1 23. 5 Lbs. - 6 L-75 Lbs./A,,,fjy K < 27 50 Lbs. :. O. k l �- ANCNpRS .. t CNEGK COMBZNE'D '(E oswl✓ 1-,WEAR ;r , Gv '< 1.0 395 61.75 _ O, 30 < l• 0 1385 + 2750 Pi 13 Hudso 4 Design Groupuc Steel Platform Calculations /N 013 Date: Salem Co Project Name: Salem Common Project Number: MA3139 Hudson Designed By:_MA_Checked By: MSC o00�.D Design Group Wind Analysis 4 Equipment Shelter & Generator Reference Codes: -Massachusetts State Building Code, 8h Edition -International Building Code 2009(IBC 2009) -Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures(ASCE 7-05) Structure Classification II (ASCE 7-05 Table 1-1) Basic Wind Speed,V 110 mph (780CMR Table 1604.10) Importance Factor,I 1 (ASCE 7-05 Table 6-1) Exposure Category B (ASCE 7-05 Section 6.5.6.3) Height Above Ground Level,z 125.25 ft (Top of Shelter) Exposure Coeficient, K, 1.05 (ASCE 7-05 Table 6-3) Wind Directionality Coef.,Kd 0.85 (ASCE 7-05 Table 6-4) Topographic Facto, Kr 1.00 (ASCE 7-05 Section 6.5.7.2) Velocity Pressure,% = 0.00256K,K,K'V21 (ASCE 7-05 Equation 6-15) 27_71sfsf Gust Factor,G 0.85 (ASCE 7-05 Section 6.5.8) Net Force Coeficient,Cr 1.30 (ASCE 7-05 Figure 6.21) Projected Area Normal to Wind,A, 200 ft2 (10.5 ft x 20.5 ft) Sheffer 50.15 It' (9.33 it x 5.5 ft) Generator Wind Force,F q�GC,A, (ASCE 7-05 Equation 6-28) = 6124.33 lbs Shelter 1535.68 lbs Generator /s 013 Date: Salem Co Project Name: Salem Common Project Number: MA3139 Hudson Designed By:-MA_Checked By: MSC_ Design GrOUpuc D Steel Frame Design Calculations Shelter Weight 20250 lbs Area/load= 88.04 psf Shelter Area 230 ft2 (1 l.5 ft x 20 ft) (P) Equipment Load 11000 lbs Area/load= 47.83 psf (P)Generator 5500 lbs Tributay width 5.75 ft Shelter (11.5 ft/2) Tributay width 5 ft Generator (loft/2) Load Breakdown Live Load -. Snow = 31.5 psf x 5.75 ft 181.13 pH = CC Shelter, Service = 25 psi x 5.75 ft 143.75 pif = DD Shelter Access-. Service = 25 psf x 5 ft 125.00 pM = EE Generator- Service = 25 psf x 1.75 ft = 43.75 pH = FF Dead Load Equiment= 50 psf x 5.75 ft 287.50 pH = GG , Shelter = 88.04 psf x 5.75 ft 506.25 pit = HH Shelter Access, Grating = 15 psf x 5 ft = 75.00 plf = II Generator Grating = 15 psf x 1.75 ft 26.25 p8 = KK 20'f 10't 6'-7't PROPOSED AT&T GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO SHELTER (TYP. OF 3) PROPOSED LEa 11'-5"x20'-0" AT&T EQUIPMENT SHELTER ON STEEL FRAME I � A H N N I , L -- I F - * , PROPOSED AT&T I 3'-6"f GENERATOR ON O STEEL FRAME PROPOSED D D ^ I 00 STEEL GRATING N PROPOSED I C GUARDRAIL I -H I I , PROPOSED AT&T (5) RRH'S & (2) SURGE SUPPRESSORS MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL FRAME ® = BEAM SHELTER & GENERATOR STEEL FRAME v SCALE: N.T.S: 'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION' /O Project:MA 3139-Salem Common page Mark Aylward / Location:Beam A Hudson Design Group Multi-Loaded Multi-Span Beam I 1600 Osgood Street Suite 3090 m [2009 International Building Code(AISC 13th Ed ASD)] North Andover,MA 01845 A992-50 W 12x35 x 22.66 FT Section Adequate By:35.0% Controlling Factor:Deflection $LOADI Version 8.0.113.0 8/20!2013 4:27:17 PM LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.25 IN U1072 Dead Load 0.59 in Total Load 0.84 IN U324 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:L240 REACTIONS A B Live Load 4745 Ib 4589 Ib s Dead Load 8431 Ib 8337 Ib { Total Load 13176 Ib 12926 Ib Ttp Bearing Length 0.82 in 0.82 in BEAM DATA Center -_---- -- -- - ---- -- Span Length 22.66 It E1- zs.esft Unbraced Length-Top 11.33 ft Unbraced Length-Bottom 22.66 ft STEEL PROPERTIES UNIFORM LOADS Center W12x35-A992-50 Uniform Live Load 0 pit Uniform Dead Load 0 pit Properties: Beam Self Weight 35 pit Yield Stress: Fy= 50 ksi Total Uniform Load 35 plf Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 ksi POINT LOADS-CENTER SPAN Depth: d= 12.5 in Load Number One jig Web Thickness: tw= 0.3 in Live Load 1335 Ib 1335 Ib Flange Width: bf= 6.56 in Dead Load 0 Ib 0 Ib Flange Thickness: tf= 0.52 in Location 1.33 It 21.33 ft Distance to Web Toe of Fillet: k= 0.82 in Moment of Inertia About X-X Axis: Ix= 285 in4 TRAPEZOIDAL LOAD -CENTER SPAN Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Sx= 45.6 in3 Load Number One TWO Plastic Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Zx= 51.2 in3 Left Live Load 324.9 pit 125 pit Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Left Dead Load 793.8 pit 75 plf Flange Buckling Ratio: F8R= 6.31 Right Live Load 324.88plf 125 pit Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 9.15 Right Dead Load 793.75 pit 75 pit Web Buckling Ratio: WBR= 36.2 Load Start 1.33 ft 0 R Allowable Web Buckling Ratio: AWBR= 90.55 Load End 21.33 It 1.33 it Controlling Unbraced Length: Lb= 11.33 it Load Length 20 ft 1.33 ft Limiting Unbraced Length- ' for lateral-torsional buckling: Lp= 5.44 it for Eqn.F2-2: Lr= 16.65 ft Tel 4/0E L&*.D = C C t DD = 9.2 r/,ock"* Nominal Flexural Strength w/safety factor. Mn= 102466 ft-lb Controlling Equation: F2-2 D kD /-040 = GG f /-/L/ _ 793, 75-p/f Web height to thickness ratio: h/tw= 36.2 Limiting height to thickness ratio for eqn.G2-2:h/tw-limit= 53.95 k- �catD..v� d KE/FK DOu7N Aco /-� 'y. Cv Factor: Cv= 1 Controlling Equation: G2-2 Nominal Shear Strength w/safety factor: Vn= 75000 Ib -rf,7 I-/YE L0'40 = E = i2S" P /'e .Controlling Moment: 74920 ft-Ib veep ro*D e /F 11.33 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Y- /-r+stD r.VG r7RER,C aOc�u p� i ,� Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s)2 Controlling Shear: 13176 lb At left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s 2 = fJ,Q 0'a PG--/(o k Comparisons with required sections: Rea Provided Moment of Inertia(deflection): 211.18 in4 285 in4 Moment: 74920 ft-Ib 102466 ft-Ib Shear: 13176 lb 75000 lb /9 Project:MA 3139-Salem Common IMP Location:Beam 8 Mark Aylward / Multi-Loaded Mulb-Span Beam 1 Hudson Design Group [2009 International BuildingCode AISC 13th Ed ASD North Osgood Street Suite 3090 ( )] North Andover,MA 01845 A992-50 W8x10 x 7.58 FT Section Adequate By:587.7% Controlling Factor:Moment SLVersion 8.0.113.0 8Y21/2013 10:05:35 AM LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.00 IN UMAX Dead Load 0.03 in Total Load 0.04 IN U2471 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:U240 REACTIONS A @ Live Load 786 Ib 786 Ib 2 Dead Load 1512 Ib 1512 Ib Total Load 2298 Ib 2298 Ib Bearing Length 0.51 in 0.51 in BEAM DATACame r Span Length 7.58 ft zsee Unbraced Length-Top 0 ft Unbraced Length-Bottom 7.58 ft STEEL PROPERTIES UNIFORM LOADS Center W8xl0-A992-50 Uniform Live Load 0 plf Uniform Dead Load 0 plf Properties: Beam Self Weight 10 pit Yield Stress: Fy= 50 ksi Total Uniform Load 10 ptf Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 ksi POINT LOADS-CENTER SPAN Depth: d= 7.89 in Load Number One TWO Web Thickness: tw= 0.17 in Live Load 620 Ib 620 Ib Flange Width: bf= 3.94 in Dead Load 0 Ib 0 Ib Flange Thickness: If= 0.21 in Location 0 ft 7.58 ft Distance to Web Toe of Fillet: k= 0.51 in Moment of Inertia About X-X Axis: Ix= 30.8 in4 IRAPEZOIDAL LOADS-CENTER SPAN Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Sx= 7.81 in3 Load Number Orme Plastic Section Modulus About X-X Axis: 7,= 8.87 in3 Left Live Load 43.8 plf Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Left Dead Load 389.1 plf Flange Buckling Ratio: FBR= 9.61 Right Live Load 43.75pIf Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 9.15 Right Dead Load 389.05 plf Web Buckling Ratio: WEIR= 40.47 Load Start 0 ft Allowable Web Buckling Ratio: AWBR= 90.55 Load End 7.58 ft Controlling Unbraced Length: Lb= 0 ft Load Length 7.58 ft Limiting Unbraced Length- for lateral-torsional buckling: Lp= 2.97 ft )PzV/vr 1-51,4DS /f 2 = 33 Nominal Flexural Strength w/safety factor: Mn= 21870 ft-Ib Controlling Equation: F3-1 Web height to thickness ratio: httw= 40.47 Limiting height to thickness ratio for eqn.G2-2:h/tw-limit= 53.95 TK/ 4/VE L0.44, - - CvFactor: Cv= 1 Controlling Equation: G2-2 s Nominal Shear Strength w/safety factor. Vn= 26826 IbSSS<> VL/}D s.UvJD = K K h Z(7,Sb) Controlling Moment: 3180 ft4b 3.79 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) 0("/$D = .3 c,2. 5 p IF t XX /F Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s)2 Controlling Shear: 1678 lb At left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s Comparisons with required sections: Reed Provided Moment of Inertia(defection): 2-99 in4 30.8 in4 Moment: 3180 ft4b 21870 ft-Ib Shear: 1678 lb 26826 lb �O Project:MA 3139-Salem Common _ page Location:Beam C Mark Aylward Multi-Loaded Multi-Span Beam Hudson Design Group p 1600 Osgood Street Suite 3090 m [2009 International Building Code(AISC 13th Ed ASD)] North Andover,MA 01845 A992-50 W8x10 x 10.0 FT Section Adequate By: % Controlling Factor:Momentent SauCalc Version 8.0.113.0 8/2112013 10:05:35 AM LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.06 IN U2145 Dead Load 0.11 in Total Load 0.17 IN U724 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:U240 REACTIONS A B Live Load 790 Ib 790 Ib Dead Load 1565 Ib 1565 to t P Total Load 2355 Ib 2355 Ib Bearing Length 0.51 in 0.51 in BEAM D Cents Span Length 10 ft toe Unbraced Length-Top 0 It Unbraced Length-Bottom 10 it STEEL PROPERTIES UNIFORM LOADS S�nSSe[ W8x10-A992-50 Uniform Live Load 0 pif Uniform Dead Load 0 pif Properties: Beam Self Weight 10 plf Yield Stress: Fy= 50 ksi Total Uniform Load 10 pif Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 ksi POINT LOADS-CENTER SPAN Depth: d= 7.89 in Load Number QU Lm Web Thickness: tw= 0.17 in Live Load 790 Ib 790 Ib Flange Width: bf= 3.94 in Dead Load 1515 Ib 1515 Ib Flange Thickness: if= 0.21 in Location 3.5 ft 6.5 ft Distance to Web Toe of Fillet: k= 0.51 in Moment of Inertia About X-X Axis: Ix= 30.8 in4 Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Sit= 7.81 in3 Plastic Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Zx= 8.87 in3 Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Flange Buckling Ratio: FBR= 9.61 00 NL+ Gona ES FX 01u Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 9.15 Web Buckling Ratio: WBR= 40.47 ,'=ND RE.4t r70Ni o F B Esi- i3 %�C AZO Allowable Web Buckling Ratio: AWSR= 90.55 Controlling Unbraced Length: Lb= 0 ft Limiting Unbraced Length- for lateral-torsional buckling: Lp= 2.97 It Nominal Flexural Strength w/safety factor: Mn= 21870 ft-lb Controlling Equation: F3-1 Web height to thickness ratio: h/tw= 40.47 Limiting height to thickness ratio for eqn.G2-2:h/tw-limit= 53.95 Cv Factor Cv= 1 Controlling Equation: G2-2 Nominal Shear Strength w/safety factor: Vn= 26826 Ib Controlling Moment: 8193 fl-Ib 5.0 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s)2 Controlling Shear: 2355 Ib At left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on spans Comparisons with required sections: Ec" Provided Moment of Inertia(deflection): 10.21 in4 30.8 in4 Moment: 8193 ft-Ib 21870 ft-Ib Shear: 2355 Ib 26826 lb Project:MA 3139-Salem Common wse Mark Aylward Hudson Design Group Location:Beam D / Multi-Loaded MultSpan Beam 1 [2009 International Building Code(AISC 13th Ed ASD m )7 North Osgood Street Suite 3090 h Andover,MA 01845 A992-50 W 10x19 x 22.66 FT Section Adequate By:23.1% StruCalc Version 8.0.113.0 8/21/2013 10:05:35 AM Controlling Factor:Deflection LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.38 IN 0720 Dead Load 0.54 in Total Load 0.92 IN U296 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:U240 REACTIONS A la z Live Load 1836 Ib 1960 It, Dead Load 2361 Ib 2630 Ib Total Load 4197 Ib 4590 Ib Bearing Length 0.70 in 0.70 in REAM DATA Center Span Length 22.66 R 22SGft Unbreoed Length-Top 9 ft Unbraced Length-Bottom 22.66 ft STEEL PROPERTIES 7Self ADS Center W10x19-A992-50 oad 0 plf Load 0 of Properties: ight 19 pH Yield Stress: Fy 50 ksi oad 19 pit Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 ksi POINT LOADS-CENTER SPAN Depth: d= 10.2 in Load Number One To Three F91u Web Thickness: tw= 0.25 in TLive Load 790 Ib 790 Ib 0 Ib 0 Ib Flange hick bf= 4.02 in Dead Load 1565 It, 1565 Ib 50 Ib 50 Ib Flange Thickness: H= 0.4 in Location 9 it 16.58 it 1 It 2 It Distance to Web Toe of Fillet: k= 0.7 in Moment of Inertia About X-X Axis: Ix= 96.3 in4 TRAPEZOIDAL LOAD -CENTER SPAN Section Modulus About X-X Axis: SX= 18.8 in3 Load Number Ong jy/q Three Plastic Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Zx= 21.6 in3 Left Live Load 125 pit 43.8 plf 125 pit Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Left Dead Load 75 pit 26.3 plf 75 pit Flange Buckling Ratio: FBR= 5.09 Right Live Load 125 pit 43.75pIf 125 pit Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 9.15 Right Dead Load 75 plf 26.25 pH 75 pit Web Buckling Ratio: WEIR= 35.24 Load Start 0 It 9 ft 16.58 ft Allowable Web Buckling Ratio: AWSR= 90.55 Load End 9 It 16.58 ft 22.66 ft Controlling Unbraced Length: Lb= 9 ft Load Length 9 ft 7.58 It 6.08 ft Limiting Unbraced Length- for lateral-torsional buckling: Lip= 3.09 it for Eqn.F2-2: Lr= 9.72 it ?0/ r K+A-DS f 2 G o.wc E FKo�w Nominal Flexural Strength w/safety factor: Mn= 35122 ft-Ib Controlling Equation: F2-2 Web height to thickness ratio: h/tw= 35.24 Eti , D z Csrt 17 011J s or` .r3E�t✓r2 G- Al/ Limiting height to thickness ratio for eqn.G2-2:h/tw-limit= 53.95 Cv Factor: Cv= 1 TK f >-a 2 Controlling Equation: G2-2 Nominal Shear Strength w/safety factor: Vn= 51000 Ib Liz- Controlling Moment: 28138 ft-Ib 7 7 Saye 9.06 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s)2 TRZ Controlling Shear: -459016 23.0 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) �EG.ngp Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s Comparisons with required sections: Recd Provided Moment of Inertia(deflection): 78.21 in4 96.3 in4 Moment: 28138 ft-Ib 35122 ft4b E Shear: -459016 5100016 % f.n.p of 3 ty Cow� Foy` SUCG^F %fRFES/TJF.1 GSSU�<EJ fo /�i�RG�� 22 Project:MA 3139-Salem Common page Location:Beam E Mark Aylward / Multi-Loaded MUIUS an Beam - Hudson Design Group P I North Osgood Street Suite 3090 rr [2009 International Building Cotle(AISC 13th Ed ASD)] North Andover,MA 01845 A992-50 W 14x22 x 20.0 FT Section Adequate By:22T2% StruCalc Version 8.0.113.0 8121/201310:05:35 AM Controlling Factor:Deflection LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.12 IN U1954 Dead Load 0.18 in Total Load 0.31 IN U785 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:U240 REACTIONS A D 2 Live Load 2131 Ib 1549 Ib Dead Load 3122 Ib 2318 Ib Total Load 5252 Ib 3868 Ib 1 Bearing Length 0.74 in 0.74 in BEAM DATA Center Span Length 20 ft "It Unbraced Length-Top 0 It Unbraced Length-Bottom 20 It STEEL PROPERTIES UNIFORM LOADS Center W14x22-A992-50 Uniform Live Load 0 pit Uniform Dead Load 0 pit Properties: Beam Self Weight 22 plf veld Stress: Fy= 50 ksi Total Uniform Load 22 plf Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 ksi pO1NT LOADS-CENTER SPAN Depth: d= 13.7 in Load Number (Q= Two Three Four Five � Web Thickness: tw= 0.23 in Live Load 1840 Ib 1840 Ib 0 Ib 0 Ib 0 Ib 0 Ib Flange Width: bf= 5 in Dead Load 2400 Ib 2400 Ib 50 Ib 50 Ib 50 Ib 50 lb Flange Thickness: if= 0.34 in Location 3.42 ft 13.42 ft 5.25 it 7 it 8.5 ft 10.25 it Distance to Web Toe of Fillet: k= 0.74 in Moment of Inertia About X-X Axis: Ix= 199 in4 TRAPEZOIDAL LOAD -CENTER SPAN Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Sx= 29 in3 Load Number One Plastic Section Modulus About X-X Axis: ZX= 33.2 in3 Left Live Load 0 pit Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Left Dead Load 50 pit Flange Buckling Ratio: FBR= 7.46 Right Live Load 0 pff Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 915 Right Dead Load 50 pit Web Buckling Ratio: WBR= 53.17 Load Start 12 It Allowable Web Budding Ratio: AWBR= 90.55 Load End 12 ft Controlling Unbraced Length: Lb= 0 it Load Length 0 ft Limiting Unbraced Length- for lateral-torsional buckling: Lp= 3.67 it Nominal Flexural Strength w/safety factor: Mn= 82834 ft-Ib 014DS t 2 C o'cC E Controlling Equation: F2-1 Web height to thickness ratio: h/lw= 53.17 8 EK 'r "p /ZE/4jr f7onl '4 Limiting height to thickness ratio for eqn.G2-2:h/twaimit= 53.95 Cv Factor: Cv= 1 Controlling Equation: G2-2 Nominal Shear Strength w/safety factor: Vn= 63020 Ib Cm�E Ficolll .e*w 0 5o /KS @q Controlling Moment: 24962 ft-Ib 13.4 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s)2 Controlling Shear: 52521b At left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s Comparisons with required sections: Recd Provided Moment of Inertia(deflection): 60.81 in4 199 in4 Moment: 24962 ft-Ib 82834 ft-Ib Shear: 52521b 63020 lb Z3 Project:MA 3139-Salem Common page Mark Aylward / Location:Beam F Hudson Design Group Multi-Loaded Multi-Span Beam 1 1600 Osgood Street Suite 3090 o (2009 International Building Code(AISC 13th Ed ASD)j North Andover,MA 01845 A992-50 W14x30 x 20.0 FT Section Adequate By:18.3% StruCaic Version 8.0.113.0 8/2112013 10:05:35 AM Controlling Factor:Moment LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.31 IN U784 Dead Load 0.52 in Total Load 0.82 IN U291 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:U240 REACTIONS A B Live Load 7764 It, 5646 Ib Dead Load 13113 Ib 9617 Ib 1 Z Total Load 20878 Ib 15262 It, Bearing Length 0.79 in 0.79 in [BEAM DATA Center Span Length 20 it mn Unbraced Length-Top 0 It Unbraced Length-Bottom 20 it STEEL PROPERTIES UNIFORM LOADS S9.gtRf W14x30-A992-50 Uniform Live Load 0 plf Uniforn Dead Load 0 plf Properties: Beam Self Weight 30 plf Yield Stress: Fy= 50 ksi Total Unifomn Load 30 pit Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 ksl 7Dead TLOA -GENTER SPAN Depth: d= 13.8 in Number 4¢8 Two Web Thickness: tw= 0.27 in oad 6705 Ib 6705 Ib Flange Width: bf= 6.73 in Load 11065 Ib 11065 Ib Flange Thickness: If= 0.39 in on 3.42 it 13.42 it Distance to Web Toe of Fillet: k= 0.79 in Moment of Inertia About X-X Axis: Ix= 291 in4 Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Sx= 42 in3 Plastic Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Zx= 47.3 in3 Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Flange Buckling Ratio: FBR= 8.74 Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 9.15 �� D Web Buckling Ratio: WBR= 45.3 /9(�p 1/,S //S Allowable Web Buckling Ratio: AWBR= 90.55 .eEgC riau d Controlling Unbraced Length: Lb= 0 it Limiting Unbraced Length- for lateral-torsional buckling: Lp= 5.26 it NomiControll ng Equation w/safety tactor. Mn 118014 ft-lb Z&�hV .4 7 ys M's FS�/,3.S /�t Web height to thickness ratio: h/tw= 45.3 �G 1 Limiting height to thickness ratio for eqn.G2-2:h/twaimit= 53.95 Cv Factor. Cv= 1 Controlling Equation: G2-2 Nominal Shear Strength w/safety factor: Vn= 74520 It, S 166 /1'fFO/'pf.^ Controlling Moment: 99723 ft4b 13.4 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s)2 Controlling Shear: 20878 lb At left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s Comparisons with required sections: 8 Provided Moment of Inertia(deflection): 239.76 in4 291 in4 Moment: 99723 ft-Ib 118014 ft-Ib Shear: 20878 lb 74520 lb �Y Project:MA 3139-Salem Common page Location:Beam G Mark Hudsonn Design Group Multi-Loaded Multi-Span Beam f 1600 Osgood Street Suite 3090 a (2009 International Building Code(AISC 13th Ed ASD)) North Andover,MA 01845 A992-50 W 14x22 x 20.0 FT Section Adequate By:26.1% StruCalc Version 8.0.113.0 8/21/201310:05:36 AM Controlling Factor:Deflection LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.28 IN U867 Dead Load 0.52 in Total Load 0.79 IN U303 Live Load Deflection Criteria:U360 Total Load Deflection Criteria:U240 REACTIONS A B Live Load 5062 to 4138 Ib Dead Load 9409 Ib 7731 Ib t z Total Load 14471 Ib 11869 Ib p Bearing Length 0.74 in 0.74 in 2, BEAM DATA Came t T7 Span Length 20 ft ms Unbraced Length-Top 0 ft Unbraced Length-Bottom 20 it STEEL PROPERTIES UNIFORM LOADS Center W14x22-A992-50 Uniform Live Load 0 pit Uniform Dead Load 0 pit Properties: Beam Self Weight 22 pit Yield Stress: Fy= 50 ksi Total Uniform Load 22 pit Modulus of Elasticity: E= 29000 list POINT LOADS-CENTER SPAN Depth: d= 13.7 in Load Number One Two Web Thickness: tw= 0.23 in Live Load 4600 lb 4600 Ib Flange Width: bf= 5 in Dead Load 8350 Ib 8350 Ib Flange Thickness: tf= 0.34 in Location 3.33 ft 14.66 ft Distance to Web Toe of Fillet: k= 0.74 in Moment of Inertia About X-X Axis: Ix= 199 in4 Section Modulus About X-X Axis: Sx= 29 in3 PC/A)7- 44.405 C o'N 6 Plastic Section Modulus About X-X Axis: ZX= 33.2 in3 Design Properties per AISC 13th Edition Steel Manual: Flange Buckling Ratio: FBR= 7.46 Allowable Flange Buckling Ratio: AFBR= 9.15 Web Buckling Ratio: WBR= 53.17 Allowable Web Buckling Ratio: AWBR= 90.55 Controlling Unbraced Length: Lb= 0 ft Limiting Unbraced Length- for lateral-torsional buckling: Lp= 3.67 ft Nominal Flexural Strength w/safety factor: Mn= 82834 ft-Ib Controlling Equation: F2-1 Web height to thickness ratio: h/tw= 53.17 Limiting height to thickness ratio for eqn.G2-2:h/tw-limit= 53.95 Cv Factor. Cv= 1 Controlling Equation: G2-2 Nominal Shear Strength w/safety factor. Vn= 63020 Ib Controlling Moment: 62992 ft-Ib 14.6 Ft from left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on spans)2 Controlling Shear: 14471 Ib At left support of span 2(Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s Comparisons with required sections: Read Provided Moment of Inertia(deflection): 157.83 in4 199 in4 Moment: 62992 ft4b 82834 ft-Ib Shear: 14471 Ib 63020 Ib iS Ord Hudson Design Group Reference Documents �.z � aP AY 'wY N�PY pNeYfYN C%%000C �S CCC B Coco a WIN , h 11 � s � � &113 a lf I'll oil A loll R Z gig 1 gig 14 •M Z ' ........g5tll°C Y8#� 2101H bwPmii—.,rS m -bL=d YAP Yg .......xxxxxxxxx ISO ! � iupq gl � €€€ ,ill s dig It �� $ 9 i a 0 A( a Jill 'Ing No ..HkgC�.v}...�i i-� AFF aaw y_ yp y gyxpp( N O� gi ti_ t SIR i n 0 Cel, ion 111111111s L }� wAr1Y 3 g FppF n m �g 5i., Hazel Jones Road 2rN.. ®® 4 ll p oi' b Bossier City, Loui13– 71111 00 �a fixe: (118) 13-2919 fox: w cell ion com 19 Rol www.cellxion.com 4 _ COLUMN SC DU E _ 1 AL b'S�c3 A4�bd 4 Y1O F 1 bENd ( E ULE •, Rlxr Jla J EM1 E3 JA Ea vv44 SKE QC�1^i2 S� r..l::r< ..+�• "I I I i d P. at Y _ a �rlpe yxda'.�C waN 401141191— =�I© NyI96e.<@(Bs4. R.ip b . ... a nl 4rI.1..d1 _ I 1 4Y1J yT'.MpI 61 B.1/gYI B1d1113. `�T11t16W034�1f1I94S.119_aDzYr93sw9NiLef1 eam1Y1 D2 .�" , la aa" a•T 211 ' 1 J 4°5 4Y9 9 4. z , ain .i 4g 1a ;y. Y1M JM1.R. �t,49 � w�• S Is l!1_ ��lr�Y. -C1 c ,or 1D51 t4.561 r- 4�_ w 41 Q I1 :^ eg x Fr. bra r z 415I 8r 5q.7 , I it _ ..II - - w9 4W 14 364!2-_l JO 4 i CZ K a B+9 1 Tor rPv r I ECAC$E>:T DJ IL - liN B' l r 6r 1 1 1 I 001-J,YBr B+.I .BY9 v + YDT X12 i2 4 '. Id 1941 r .,£.� W� .. • 7. a j.Btn SBS aq .8°II BYBI i4+9i4.5 e n 1 .� .tRd�.. d .... a.- .. .. 4. 14''a... _ 1D0•Q ^12 3•d ry� 4e3 IOII!iLYO a y pelf OAA 4,AS .-q lYl:uL SEGTIo•! a i p�r3 a as 14-ifr8 9 0-9 1'-4-:1'8°9 B 3 j9N 96d 136?_ I Y 21a Oolv4 eIR as. _...C_ 1 yq 9 I, A.3 v.41'L Io Pl'y 11WII.BYIOI 1 B 9 9rc \ BI 4 , 3 P 40 a I. 4 s, a es a ler a','bSn iaNll iB+Ia 4ngl 9°II Ie:"3 B>q�Bill 3 I2eI x 7I hId 3L wok �?N i d A r 1s7 4d� x .g1Tr d otn _I` I C14 .,i •f eLL T- To b= a';-.512.Sac T'PI CAL VET, -S THIP AI.D DNG. S ,1 v� 5 Besv>. toB+zS KBt¢5 14 eAQ$., IC0A45 je Bee, 20 BA¢5 QST Fn Qp C6WNU.TIE DEte ILS �Lz sl s4 el,eA..nl•.o1.. •u.tt Iba�° INCat N0 a.DE¢ 1T - LY GOLfJMr.i SCHEDULE 9a ..L >Kq•.I•o• IlOBE0.T,alA f50CUlES "' ". 3bJrI J 77yy ( A0.CNRttR�XO FNWNEEPS ;.. .:: s.Rc OEbt,H�l9fAl 5 XDRISN :r ?Clip FL 5V:W 5&era6LL-"jT a a •4bw iiu.T{y-�� FjEC DE •.lam" i _ xY x'jp501a• 51 tM `dYiiY �.: a :ilA$. E$ ,0°,1„� M(SC• TS '••_ 5.vfaCaiaw4d v.d. ha'° T fE7@Z[�!Ts1FT. T., i.•.•. ._..._. ._.....�... .... .r..j..-+v.RS..yvrn.. .x .,.. .. .. �I l•i.. _ . O O rr..r O O O \'/ Q � .. II s9 Tov G.E2 5'.D•} .. . ..: 'y. . ' er.e _ _ «,.• -�-_ ....�:.• . ..._ O.r.... , __-t L_R��- _ /`.ip%\...—_ el, J(g. e T v o.vrs5 e..a S' il^sa Vat..- n L .ZBI 4B2 � _ ROl 0.09 Y • a6, 4t4 MIL 4 d 52i 1 1 l i a MIr ?xA v. �� H G' fD• _ 1 i'� 9, i, eC U 9Iis4D ).DT S �T I�' re. tr)rtt >Fc lor.l iI '1 's a .d 9Ts6T ,.''>D 14'^J �!..:_r•tl t Eocz %y,-r..�. ..n L.1 i lot41, I, Ir {/�\ MD•Rn Draw •'&- si 55 ST ys \Y✓� 1 D (.JT-F Df'a C. -• o 1 4 I Gr L r 1',P s• fl 1 II .,.1 r m' n!?D 2 'N _y>D n•:'r I 3, . . `.vel ! su.0.r+vx4 ..BE.t I✓ .JLI_ 1 oM>• ,J-.dc J $sB y, vat ' a f � IT I �._ -i` I I¢EE ♦ 73 o Ev. Be'B -iDD .w of '_.:4... �yd LI � RE':141-7-7 iesLel¢ Tli��ji ¢>< 1 4{� I'- i , _ IC S eP,z✓�L• ' i>I R, > � f 191 653^sH eE i 1 ti,'1 9�Wa5.< I BRIn x � " J D ep• A- ..__ I.Foz s�u:acE.0 LnY•ua 4`a'sln0 S7 5�ody sl �L014ut¢AL IIOL S 5'/P Ri61_5 4EE'+.1G `31 All t . ROBERT CHARLES ASSOCIATES INC. NCUSING FOR THE ELDERLY u PROJECT MA9T.47.5 R:70F= D.-_IJ yYJIJiE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 5ALEM Hou514G AUTxozm PLA1J'•EcA1!`� ' d�` •S: ii it°Piot, 5AL EM,MA55ACMtl5ETT� "" r.DcT.., i sp IBM.YPsiPtx Vstsss a pgyu,tlfu NANEPASHEMET - PROJECT MANAGEMENT RYAN NESTOR } PROJECT MANAGER 1 328 WEST SHORE DRIVE SDITE IA MARBLEHEAD,MA 01945 Y { 78E-632-0265 RHES OR@NANEPA HEMP.COM W W W.NANEPMBEMMCOM 1 .. r 6 at&t 550 pJCxxWrt BOND at&t � MAVMIM WDi71N. «< Pinnacle whl je.s uOBOB=oz—F. 3 MA3139S HudsonOO SALEM COMMON a 0R 27 CHARTER STREET SALEM,MA 01970 AMEL P. s SITE TYPE: ROOFTOP SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION Recisr ^°fs�"`e SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. �(Tp sN C I. BE I5 M R THE OR MO EESON F S ABBESS EW R TN MO MU �1D(✓AE C^ BE IISEO FOR PL 1PMISYRSpN EM ML 91CiV1 MR 1XE PJI&OYT i-1 1111E SHEET 1 pp OF PRGNOIHO FUBIIC LFllLVA]ER+ICE OH-I GENERA.Npl6 1 t. 3. Oil FMA MUM LL CONSUME W UI ERI ��M6P'FG WlC ]. NO MM UDE WA1ER SLIM 10 BE PROli0E0 AT Tx9 IOGTON. C-1 PIAT PµV 1 - R a. NO.WA1ER Mu BE GEREM ED Ai TNI.IIMAIwx. A-1 RMF PVN!WI SHELTER PITH 1 � � 0. NO SOLD WAflE MLL BE GENEIUTFL AT NS LOGBFDN. 0. AilT WMIFNMCE CREW(IYPICILLY QYE REASON)NLL MVD:M RMAONS A-1 OJENARNI 1 4 AwPME OF ONE TRIP PFA YCNM AT ONE NOW PPA NSrt. A-J CfixLS 3 N I 1 MV DEINIS 3 S-1 sRa FIRMING PUN 3 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS S-3 sIEEL FRMS DETNIS z SST SIEFL FRME BURLS 2 MRDMONS ON E OB B NL vW0 MD MONS R BYDIMTNoxs AND o,/W1 gxOMJCICM IC.W➢ MNEW5 5 M nM JOB Slit MD sS, IMMEO . IgfRY P DEBOW S-] $fm FRAME OEfNL4 1 QAWEA'S RFPBE OR hE SO MUIINC FOR gSCISPMClE9 BEFORE PROCEEgNO 1;/IN1]RA GGAV.MN 9-S MIENNA R !SUROE AARE4NR MWNO.DESNIS 3 MM 112 NDRN qi BE RE�OWIBIF FOR BWE. 0 WPLI [N.IM R.T4W E-1 PoN£A 0 1EILtl RSFA OMGRMI.PMEL Y.RWBE!N016 1 ISN tllE OISfAmlld E-1 DmA SONMPc s uAAL1 BRING MAL 3 3 WORKING DAYS c-1 GR"B"wo PIM!xmcR z ..B �� C-3 GAS" R6ER DML'RM!oETNLs 3 - WN/ WNON iA'w w M sxNM P-1 W FVH z " . BEFORE YOU DIG soE]vac P-: DEiNLs 3 PS-1 RF P.MBIHO 04OAW 3 3 PROJECT INFORMATION: N . CALL TOLL FREE 888—DIG—SAFE SALEMCOMMON PROPNM DRONER SU How"OR s1REEr •. . 37 cHwE - -.itl UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT sALDt.w clow 1... 0P . MEW CINI NRB,M LLc ORMNG OIRECIIONB 7s SRREf SED COCHRWIE ROAD SVDE 13!14-SND FLO% SOlEL1. M'L 01870 FRMJXGWL.W 01701 DVI RT-.TO W / MCNNWIE 101 lOMA9D SWIM W 0] YI/ NM` PALA IX! Rf-JD E / MOE DRESS, 3l IBI BIXEk1 CI RD DJ MI/UKMP M0 FOR FBO FA41 TOWARD BATON/I-BO 0.7 YI/AT IXR 910EL.lOf.' —LEA.MI 01070 1I.WE RWP IODM FOR -BS NORM TORRID WN.NAA/PORRYMIII MH 10.0 UV NFID LEFT DMO D,/ x Ss MI/.T ECT SOA T.V2 RMP ROM roR Rr-11a FAS!TowMD suEu/WSSI Tm.E SHEET MUNw: 6Sp PEWDY/IbMFLL ET./OA MI/BFM PoCM IXIIO M-111/' OT Bf 0.A YV IUPN LEFT TO SI ON M-114 / WVSNI SI/ (=O ON THE MPNW 0.1 MI/ TORN MOM TO NAY ON VTNOL H 4T]t'Mr N 41031104 M-114/zvtBREA M (PMS 7-FIEIIW IN 1.0 YD 11 M/NRN TEFF TO$IM ON M-114/ LONgNDG W]O OJ'SOA' W 70.080884 N. 01 D.3 MI/ry lER OMO WMXIxONN Sf.MD 1WH YMDTARY NRN MGM ONTO RNM n o.1 MV.SRNGM OXIO OEx1RLL SI/c— sr 0.1 MI/NWM Ai 37 O"'W" .1.CVSBIFIGnox: cFMW1 DM1LiYEM BO MT./ THE VR! IMEMRECMM v VFAYLTE S7/ IF wu MMN M-u / Mw1 ME dw / DMECIC ( ) WMNIXC@Y EO W.w"E MHE Rp FM DMEW JUWENGIION: pF(DF YIFY T—1 TM ID PNO:EL NUMBER JO-.n-O GENERAL NOTES at&t I, FOR ME PURPOSE OF LONSIXVGEON MAYERS ME FOLiCI °EERVIIONS SHALL AFPLr. 19.SINCE THE CELL 511E IS MINE,AL SAFETY PREGID0NN MAST M'JYRWS READ WMMLIOR-PINNACLE MREIESS TN(EN WHEN WORMING MOUND HIGH LEVELS OF EIECTROWONETIC 10. WMRMNfl SVA.COMPLY WITX AWS R M FOR PROCWUPES. PpuIWOMN.W IIIA, SVBCONSMTOR-GENERA.CONTRAMOR COMRtULTION WADAEOX. EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SHUTDOWN PRIOR M HRFOBABHO MY COMECOAPPEARACEµD OLWIIY OF C)EREWELEAND NR YEMOCE SEW H ( ) WPRELTNO WELDING.ALL WFIDEIS MO WEEDING PROCESSES SHAY .NEW-R!T WORE TNT COULD EXPOSE ME WORKERSWE TO 0.TOfAL PEOF ANY RF SE QUALMS IN ALLORMCE WIM AM SµWN Q.FCABOX EANGEROU MEXPOU AME AW6W TO WORN RI ALERT OFµY (C 2 PRIM ro TIE SM FAMON OF 01°£TIE&WING SUBWMONS AN SW1L 6WCEPWS EXPOSURE LEN15. AND WEDDING ALL WELDING SHALL,BE CONE USING ERE F EIE WELDS Y15R TIE CELL SIM T(1 FAMILWtl$E NTN TIE EXISTING LONdIlON9 N!0 N MO WEDDING SNLLL GO FORM E A5C MO°I.I. E PER HLLEi MLD pinr2<7C e CONFIRM TNT TIE WORN GN BE MWMPIESHW M SHOWN ON TIE 20.APPIIGBLF BUI{DINO C006 WES ME NOT SHOWN,FpW,OE TAE 41NAIUY ERE PER iIB1E J2A M LOMIRUCWN DRAWINGS. .VTI°ISLREPA4LY FOUND SHALL EE BROUGHT TO SU.COMMCIDN'S WEEK SNAL COMPLY WIN AL APPLICABLE MTOW1. ME A5C'WNIIAL OF STEEL CONSIRUCWN'.BTI ORION, WIICIP.9!3 TIE AMEWON OF gN1fPAClCIV. STATE,AND LOCAL CODES M ADOPTED BY TIE LOCAL AVIHORTY AND 11. INCORRECTLY FMRIGIEO,DV4➢W ON OTHERWISE MISL IX°OR UMeMf10G19]WiCES JURIMSIDM(AHI)ROP ME RNMpN. TIE ORION OF TIE AL ADMIFD NON-CONFORMING MMTERMIS OR WNWORS SMALL WE flEPOMED TO MN✓SWIL��` � ]. ALL NAIFPW9 FURNISHEDµ0 INSINIW SMA.BE IN 41RICI W06µO SFµCMM IN EFFECT W ME GTE OF COMPACT AWARE ME CWSIRULTW WAMER PRIOR M REMEDIAL OR WPRECME WRMEYIL BOMB ACCORDANCE WITH ALMPLIG&E WOES.REGULATIONS,µD OROIHWCM. SIGONTM TAE DESIGN. MHON.ANY SUCH M CN SHALL REWIRE WNSIRULT°N MANAGER W SUBNTNCTW SIAL MUE NL MA PROPVE NOTICES MD COMPLY WAIN BUILDING LME:SIDES IBL WIN NASYiNIF.F13]BJ WR MS SWIM AyggwAD ALL GM,ORDINANCES.WAIFS.pECAIUTONS,AND UNWNL ORDERS OF ANY EIECTllGL CODE REFER TO 6ECIIBGL OMARNES EMILIO PERFORMANCENIX IY REGARDING TS PERFORMANCE 01 TIE WORK.ALL WORN NEHG LODE:RMER TO ELECIRIGL ORAWINGS 12. UNISIRUT EHLLL.BE FORMED STEEL CHANNEL Ma FRAMING AS 0 CARRIED q?SMLL COMPLY WIN ALL APPUGBLE MUNICIPALµ9 LYURY MANUFACTURED BY UNISIpUT CORP.,COACHES,MI OR WEAL SIRUIHudson COMPANY EPWIFIGTWS AND WEAL JUR601CIIONLL WOES.Ofl01MNLE5 MO M..DMMPACI°R'S WORK SMALL.COMPLY MX TIE U1FST COITION OF TIE MpIRFAS IIHAL BE 1 S/B'al 5/B'v 1261 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, mBCAPRI APPLICABLE PWUTA1pN5. WLLOMNO STµDW05: !£D A. SWIM PECAMD HERE ME NOT M BE SCALED AND ME INTENDED µ0 SMA.BE HOTS AS EMBLY .CONTER WFABOF OU TO SHOW OIINNE ONLY. REQpGN CONCRETE IN511111 (NI]18;BUILDING WOE 1], ORORO ANCHOR ASSEMBLY SHALL CONSIST OF SI THREADED SREL REQUIREMENTS NR SIRUCNpµCOXCRFIE: ANCHOR FOD WIN D A !WASHERS.µIM RACK T STIES DESERT, S. UNIffi HOIEO OTHERWISE.TIE WOPIf SHALL INCLUDE NW1NA I NO µpryGN IMfIryTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION A SCREEII TUBEµD A EPOSIW-2 MNESNE TXEµCXORIEN 9UAS WTERNLS,EWIPMOW APPURIIXWLES,AND G90R NECESSARY 10 COMPLETE OVSC) AV1L BE ME HILT-MR HY-20 AN CR M-LBO SYSTEMS(M va,wn:umw ALL INSTALLATIONS M INDICTED ON TIE GROUNDS. SPERFlW IN HID,)OR EXWMEMS MPROYE°EDEN. ANNUAL Cf SIFEL WNSIgUCIgN.ASD.IMIRRRRX ERT]Ni jN OF MS$ B. k NO L SUPPLIED'MRN ME BID PACI(IDENTIFIES IEMS THAT M 14. EKPAMNN COLTS SMEL CONFORM TO FEDERAL SPECIRI I„PA' 'r✓C+ WILL WE SUPPLIED BY COM ACTOR. TIMS NOT INCLUDED IN E BILL OF GYRUMIARAL STANDARDS TANGADA IAO9 IM Wm NOUSTM ASSOCIATIONN(NJ T2Y-O, FF-S-]RB,GROUP II,TRE V,CVIS 4 111 MRK WLT III OR 'SG MAIERWSµD HITTING LETT SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY TIE STIUWCOWRAFI°R. MPRONED MUAL INRAIATION SMALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANE f ANIEL P. y PRIM.MOMµ0 AWENM SUPPORTING STRUCTURES;REFER MMUFMNRER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. M 1 T. AME NCE WIN M N F S R INSTALL ALL NDAYONEQUIPMENT MO LATERALS IN TO pEOM•LGL DRAWINGS WR SEVERE ELECMGL STANDARD. 15, LUMBER SMLL COMPLY WITH AHE RMU MENR OF TIE ACCORDANCE WN MANIFMTIREA'S REWNMENGTONS UNLESS SPECIFlLNLY MERIDA IXSNUtE OF TIMBER CONSMIUMONµD AHE MIONV SLATEDIFOE E FOR RDI LgINC5 BM MEMOD SOF CON OF LISW OR D MO SIMGGW O.M1 JeO WR6T PWWCN MSOIXATOX'S RATIONAL OWGN SPECIFICATION WR RECAiDINC 1N1EAW.MEMWS OF WNSIPULT0.V,Qi OT1ER �T S. IF TIE SPECIFIEDESUSC EOUIPNFM HALL P BE SEANINSTALLED M SNTNIN G!THEM gEOUIREYEME.TIE MOST RESWCRJE RWUIREMEM SAIL OOaflfN. WAND WNSIRUCIION. ALL COMBER SIAL BE PRESSURE 1RFAlFD A40 `RSTEAP` t{4' CRAW WS,TRE$UWOMMLTOR 5X41 DROWSE M KTERW1taE INSTNUTON WgplE TIERE IS CONNCT BETWEEN A GENERAL RE0U111HEM AMID A SHALL BE STIULNML GRADE N0,2 OR BEI ^[� SPACE NR MPRWAL B1 ME CONRADTOR. BROAD ROU NEW ME SPECIFIC NS°UIREGM WALL GWERY. AQNAI�` 16. AHEM OT AND MORATg1E ARE REQUIRED,DWORN ME WMRIDNP AN r CABLES,GROUN�Ma°GABLES.ERS SH�OA'N ON TOOF E POWERMOGRR'OUx PONER STRUCTURAL NOTES WALL°µo�p"WWN°q�NSTALLER.WORN ryME BBUIIDINo µID TELCO PVN DRAW W. SUBCtlMNDTOR SHU L MUSE EXISTING CMTS 1, DESIGN REOUIREMEWIS ME PER MIT BUILDING CODEµD =MRMW IN SUBI A MANNER M TO NOT VOID ME ASTM ROOT AND/OR SHALL MD NEN TRAYS M NEC EMJY..SUWOMPACNR SMLL MPLIGBLE WPPLEMINR.ABLE)-IO EIVM-SSS-O RRIKIURLL WMRMTY. ROOF SMLL BE WATERTIGHT. WNNPM ME MILL RODUNG WN ME CONTRACTOR. STµGgpS Edi STFIIµCENTRA,1°MFI6µO MIFI:M OPPOSING WRMSSIONSIT. ALL MEpOVIS MEMBERS USW ME M MANUFACTURED BY10.ME SMOONTRUMI SHALL PROTECT IXIWNG IMPROYENEMSr SIRUCNR6' STRONGWIIL WMP.ANY OF BPISNL VA 2420].NL DESIGN CSIENN PAVEMENT£WPBS,1µ05GPINCµ0 STRUCTURES.AWDREDGEDP/RI2, COMPMIOR SMLL MFRIFY AL WMEMONS AN°WNONONS IN NR IN E MEMBERS B RASED ON IXWRMTON PRTIDED IN ME SNVLBE REPARW AT SU CONTRMNR'S EKPENSE TO ME S4TFMTYJN OF ME F1RD PNOR TO FMMGTOHµ0 ERECTION OF AW MIERMLµY COSIGNYNILVL NL RWUIpEMEMS PUBLISHED IN SVO WNLLLL YU51OWNER. UNUSUAL CDNCNONS SHALL BE REPORTED N ME ATEEWON OF ME BE STHILTLY ADHEflW M. CONSTRUCTION MµMER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD. I0. NO M1EAW5 10 DE ORDERED AN°NO WORK TO BE COMPLETED 11,SUWOMRMNS SMALL LEGALLY M PROPERLY p5P EGR OF Nl M ME UNTIL SIM DEMANDS HAVE SEER RENEWED AND APPROVED IN NAI GING Wd M W VML GIDESµ➢°HER ITEMS REEDIER E O NE ]. MESONµO CONSTIBI O W SIL, C NSTR SRR$WEL LONFOM ,WRITINGwl MatinEXISTING FMRIY. ANIENW9 REMOhU SAL BE RENRHW T)ME OµfR'S 10 MEµOWN' INSTITUTE OF DT EFL WNSIFF SMJ lIUM TEEL MUTw061GWIED LCGTON. FON ME C6pX,iMRIGTOMµD EflELTON OF SNUCNRA BIFELIW SUBCOMPACIDP SHALL FIREPROOF NL SEM.M PRE-IGURGINO 12.AIECONIRADIOR SHALL LEAVE PREMIUM IN CLEAN COMMON. WR MUCHU AL DOWMIN, mA¢WA STiDCIDUS 41FF.L HALL WXNgM TU ASM MBS[N�9°bi, IPOk.' I],ALL CONCRETE REPAR MRK SHALL BE DONE IN MLORGYCE WINS M6LFWE INDI 51EF1 SNVl CONFORM RI ASTM MB UNL6E AMERICAN CONCRETE INSIIME(LOQ BOt. OMEA'M116E INDICTED. IF"i IF WUO URAL.EONS ERS FROM TNT BROWNDPRI ON ME°MAW. ARE ARE M EXONK IA ANY NEW CONCRETE NEEDED FOR ME LOXSIRUMON SMALL BE B. 41EEL PIPE 51ULL WNPApM N ARY MW'COIR-WRMW ME STPUCNWL ENGINEER SHALL BE MAY BE EGUR TO PRWEEMNO COWPlNo IERAWORK SIAL BE CONE IN ACCORDED AND WALL.HAVE 4000 AN ANCE WINAS]1B COOE28 DAYS. LL M ASM AU PIWELDED* PE°BIEEL BUCI(CAREM NRO HOT-DIPPED UIPPW➢NCC' G�E B, WINS WMSIRUCIIOH, N,PIXW°E9GH MAY BE REWIRED. SBLSYB: a® REQUIREMENTS. MLOW AND SEANCE$$TWE E OR S.CADGE B.PIPE SIZO INOIGTW ME NOMI MNµGUSHES DMIEIEp 6 NAGGER. 15.AL BENNE AL STEEL WERE SHALL EE OEr.VIID,FABPIGTED Mo MA3139S ERECTED IN ACOMANCE WN NW SRCIFIGTOXS.AL SMVLTIRLL STEEL B. SHER RLL CONNECTION BOLTS SWEL BE NICK STRENGTH BOLTS - SWAL WE ASTM AM IN.]B KSI)UNLESS OMMWEE NOTED. PIPES SMLL ZINC TY µD CONFORM TO ASIA AVS TYPE-K'MIGI BIRFNBM SALEM COMMON BE ASIA AV Mn E(I.]B M). ALL RIE.WOO 10 M. BOL3 WR E10.UCNPN JOINTS INCWOW SUFMLE NUS AND PLAIN SHALL BE HOT DUPED GLVANIEF9. t°UCHUP ALL SCRATCHES AND OMEN HARDENED W'MXEIG.ALL WL3 SHALL BE]/A'CN LION, EDAM IN ME RF10 AIFII STEEL IS ERECTED USING A COMPATBL£SANG T µ ML B EEL TERMAS SIAL BE GALVANIZED MER FABRICATION IN RICH PAM. ACCORDANCE ARM ASTM AIM ZINC(NOT-SP°LLVANRW)CGTNGS 5 15,CONSTRUCTION SIAL COMPLY WM UNR SPWIFlGMJMS AN°I ENEPAL W IRON AND MI PRODUCTS',UNLESS OM ARAE NOTED. ZT CFwBEFI SM1SET CONSIIU CIIM SEM9LR WR CQM MJCWN OF AT&T WORMY SFW.' B. ALL DELIS.ANCHORS AND MSCEWNEOW MMOAME SMALL BE $A1FA1, IM 0/8J0 17.WW MANCEOR MAIL MEUIFY AL EXALTED DIMENSIONS AND WN=ONS OA.V ZED IN ACCORDANCE WM ASIM AVB]ZINC-CGTW(HOT-DIP) PRIOR M COMMEMNO ANY WORN,Al DIMENSIONS OF EMYNO LN IRON AND SIFEL HARONME',UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LONSTRU'CI N SHOWN ON ME DRAWINGS MUST BE VERIFIED. O, RFID MID£DRILL H°IEq GW CME AND ALL WMGW SUMBAYEKTW SIAL NOTIFY ME COMPACTOR OF NM OIXREPANCIW GJ.VAM SURFACE EWEL BE fEPARW WITH AN ORGANIC ERIC PRIOR M ORDERING MNERNL OR PRGEMNG WAIN LONSIRUOICN. SUNNI PNM WMPLVIW WIN REQUIREMENTS OF MM VOL _ GENERAL NOTES GALVANIZING REPAR PRIM SHALL HAVE BS PERCENT EIXC BY WEEK 15.ME W WM CELL SFE IS IN Na SHALL. SEND" EN ZAP BY OUXCAN GLYMEING,GYVA BRIGHT PREMIUM BY LWIM CA WN$IPIR WN NCRK BY SUOLOMPACIOR SCOL HOT pSRUP!ME EMSIWG EGA.THICKNESS OF MPUW DLLVµRWG REPAIR PAM SMALL.BE NORMAL OPERATION. ANY LADEN ON ENIWNG WLIPMEW MUST SE NOI NOT LEBS MAN A CORM(ALLOW TYE N OM WlM➢!CGTS) LW WIMRAIM M CONTRACTOR ALSO.WORN GOOLLS BE SCHEDUED FGR WN A RBES T G CGTNG MldMMM IME IS BY MIM A123 OR f EE[YLry AN MPR PFU E MNMIXWGE WINDOW USUALLY IN LOX MAEM,PERIOD A111 M MPLIGBIE RMR LI GENERAL NOTES: at&t R. YWIIGL wnY: NORM MIFAIUN VWIIGL wNN Z 0r toes !e0 olwlwrz Im10 4$ ]. NaR¢aMu wnM: NORM Awmru�wnu m tees ^V1N01P1'w almt NM u) {. LOMROL PoIM: UIINOG{T JI'1 Pinnacle«L n1, . ILNe11WE TO A'Rea' S p. PROPWIY QMIf0.' SNXd HOR G MIM1IOATI Wig'C�L'SS .1R sae-wte n qualm sMm ImrzeXClne.M.sRztcrsmRamn aesn sMRM.w 01.70 em MYBWIL PNaRs low 1FR qA ! 6 SIZE N11NSm: .130 \m�Cf OYAB 1y 1!-Yilf ! IF1JT�1 \ \ — /� WZ•�(O I T. SIIE/L9RE4: n�GYR1ER IBBIRFEi Pu 9tP wols1 e. .wwvl: "NOO"N°CINOU�isic Porn m Hudson* ® t.5 I SM IJ!I{-px0 BOOR FRAxwoNAu,w oIlol i 1pm10IT \ y,nlf R. JYRISOIOIION: OIIY Or SV£IW m XaN ls� y v-om °mwme, rsraw =s3 10. WAOR IP. J oO-71) 0 11. P.REsmErwE: eoRo-n ta. P.REsmmm: cm or sulN TM ZOxWO CUIIIf1GTON: CQIIIVL DE .EM(BJ) ANI MIIP Yef� 1„ �� fa I$I 14 .LLl YmF�]law YINM1 IXFWIATM YA9 RRNNID 41N1 -1 _ i F"1 G�I® 9Aftli WHSTGTIW9 ASO ENSIMC RIN!6 RERro.M ///�)y�Cy]�_ U �'L\ ttNRMId Ni.1LL ItlA1E ILL WWFAmIM9 VRnm IX ThE .Yp y AcG p.M iRW IRw 10 AYY SIIE MJR[Wl nH PNIOR FgFU.YL q� / / !e-°61P 1I ®\'/ Il EXGVA-�np1�ILTNM011fIG1XN lP-NOR6 %ew 101NY \Aee(f I I 11 \ I t _ {.� q�\ Rwu m�tw(oc(cxW-w Mrat-w . - ` INN 1p PRrewn ure mmwAnox N mwlm FRIY.sysws NAN q\ 1 µo ramm oownMs Aw R xm m eE mumzo u xrvuo ��xFfa wre WON.... 6 A RBn m'JX4IRY 9RM1£Y.N.9 1wmwam wY RENSIONS µEES lP nuexc smw v No..BUEn ax tRLc xmrN 1R1rt DERBY / N.R.a mamlm mdl mrnuo Puv mro¢s1¢11 n NOT CC , N�EME0 ro 9E M NID I P.w6INING V a O OL 17 LEGEND t +M/I wxnesnaX ReX® as_sYm to x n- weue I` I�!'0'1° J Plmwm u:e-sua:m PURa rsaXn r1n m1eX PnOPmrc I.us-MvmxO rwcu .44 Iay. w1E s EE4ERPiMH p _ _ _ zwao NSlwcr ewxwm e 1 —————— ero•Plmwm sEierG OE{i0Y � ,--�'I �/ p1CKEa xX-xm PAR06 w Wflw M sxmx sew \ps-pinl ) /1 �EnYL MA3139S ZONING INFORMATION SALEM COMMON m MOTt OON Cf 9NF,1 meow aslRcr m2 mlmu 0nu0PIpNT(esl DIMENSION REWIRWINTS REWIRED PRSOem FWIPMmT 'Z1 mi041Qi SRR£F 5{110A,M1 018]0 MAIL MIEXNA NEIWT S'ABOK NO 0' PLOT PLAN movT YAdT sTBAas 1a J BOFiDBL sx[P•IW soE YARD w1ee0x lo' Is'/I" RINK YARD SETBAG 1C Y 0 ea I® �: PLOT PUW I. PIOf pUX MCI ON C OF BU FM TM woe. R. SITE SVA w3 NOT BM WNOIIOIFn BY INOSON yOL{,yp; DMON GROUP,NL..7115 PROIFLT...eERACl6 T.WNY THw PUN le BtSED ON IBO.S RFSETFNOEII i oGwwns. J. Au SE No ME sAD1YN TO PROP03n AT&T EOUIPYr C H A R T E R S T R E E T �za-0':(orm)—� a REFFA ro sRumuRu nwLTss at&t �� er:xuvsvN vmlcx wvuP.LL< wTEoAucusr zv,zoos ��RD.o PW me cwMm vP TxE iwuworoM.W Onal X --------------- ----------------- ------- — ^__} ® Ewsnxc smucmRcs ro suPPoer TIE PROPmm mVIPMFM. Pinnacle __ Witcluas ERISfIN6 YENi OMeYCIDHV.EEPVR RS UNIT 9m YYmW.PNEIR RO+D.WT wA O !m (mwmm AUT l>)Rwrs. mxrsvR cr Dams PROPOSATW I I y)pppL55pp mu OX EWIPMENE 9x6TFA PRDROI EO BWA9f iwYE DOOR I I 1 (rM.. F ASPW N0 WAO Hudson©� PMFOSFD ATM OXNWOE EXIUING M.01 OxWcao 0 TD COWY18 BEIGA'(M.J g CESS x H :mmaa nefl ,�{ 4 ! /// AVI�EXIII71NGM J xx �wiwm :.d m96iv I �' I I �m WTD m / , WE Nv uEmaPcs OF S� s�D].TER MP.w s) �� Cy NIEL P. �j, UND ATWBOA rn s mwEPYYN!6i�FA N ( ON SUELMPIATFORMEpVIPMEM 0.4 JeO srwc oww e•-z•: � k mP� III �I PI III ®I races Dorn ssioNal ' Exlsnxc euavwO IL EXII III ®® Lrnsm moxEm wa PENTHOUSE� PENIxcVSE -- �® P.w°Ea c'A RensloNs I gpPmFD AT�RO]F OMI PS AYIENWOO III ^•. �__ Ili FDAED/ISFIY\J�DROVNO�OAS WOLM 10 Xw�evR� lewm IIB i UYP. OF s) a Vmv. mremcnw I I FRwVSm ATM n u�a'�R mR awmx+le. PRO.Arm PmIfA D I NPW+OxIUATE LOcnnory or I PROwsEo n rm Pnn p OdFiglpi ox TPyCp CDNWR IXISINc RT11111 CLOSES 60, a Rum _ sRF1 Pnwe rn sumoEs I I sv.l wTE DfSWIPIDx _ PRaro°ED um PROftm PROPOSED IXISPNC OWA�WL Slm IICXT IIITTIII _____________ _ WJIm � AS sIpWX 11111111 __; _ _ I ® PROPOSm LR WK PWPoSm aw M RI PROFAm AiIT OOU, myCl)09981E - - MA3139S T.m YmVIE! 1) I ®I 19 RACK RF 991J1 P,�,°�" RAo� SALEM COMMON MWHSED)OR PROPII $WRC®m RRT RKF J SRFI.Fr OF ' _ OWW ) WyW I� I �i \ I OI 11S I•S•IQ'-0•ATM f NWEII•FlSER EWIFYEM 91E m S[GM1'DB I PROPND CwM JZ CFWtIEA SIRFF( DM ` IXISIIN6 "MECNPNqqT I RlAOR SLLd, W 018]0 PROP WOUN A1M NIImRIS CM.OF TO WILDS IMME L � \fit PmPOSm FRWl6m OF i2)(P mror"mK)4 -_ O rwrD �� ROOF PLAN&EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLAN moPOsn ATM(2)nem EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLAN WRNIM)PROFmm MI 1MY SLUE J/C-i'-0' _ 91EF.L1Gk E%I STNO ELECTXIOI ®.•1®\ ROOM ON Flan FLOOR ROOF PIAN ® eq D fy ra ay' air A-1 a...sAP'-r-r o re•s•y ia-e• irc PROFOS Ale GPs CXIETNG PENTHOUSE F AXRIIW 1pLME0 TO at REFER ro s1RUGNnA-HWLYFRS SHELTER(M.OF 3) EXISRNG METROPOR &'l BY:HUOEW 06pN GRWP,= ANTENNA MP.) Tpp OF PEMNOUEE OATFD.W.ST Y0.2013 PROPOSED 11'-0130'-C PROPOSED ATe[1)PoOI'S SSo GEH111W[Ibn FOR THE GVMIIY OF THE ELEV. 1]1'-6"1(ASL {RWMGNy,NI..1.1 MSIING STRUCTURES TO SUFFORT ATM EGIAP105NT SHELTER (31 AC WOUIF 6 ! SUREF THE PROPOSES EQUIPMENT. ON SEFL FRAME 9UP%IESSdB W PROPOSED&W4F FRAME TOP OF ANA. / - (M.OF"M A ATM 516L1W �LF PROPOS®ATM OEXERATCR gTA wcC P ON STEEL FRAME ) EIEV.tID-!t i 111I]il(: e TOP OF ATM WII'CIGFR9 P5CW09FD ATM(�RHI'A EXISTING METROPCS PROPOS➢AN EMNkS UMeFCILBLLSET%6eempOM (p�N' YCOIILE t(I) EWIPMEM ON �, IIA y t yF1pyL1 qp}5 pDVL IfYT�3A MOUNTED PRO STEEL PUTFORM WNDEKK a pylyq S,=RN ON(".OF _ SI@,fRWC(IYP.OF TOP OF PARPPET W10U sEC10R) "" ELEV 111'-G'3(1CL� � —1\ roP GE ROOF HUdsoO©® E. 113'-B 1(AGL PaIP16mP ANTENNAS CM.MOUOFF TO PEUIIDSO TOTACADEL T pR7WN=ATM OF sI IAPNMFD TO MATCH) ELEv.110=03 9-T uwlmceo°%ap.ilu•w i ��SH OF AMg� I M c 4 Je0 �L'I$iEf� 've � UCEX4p FMJNE@ RATE 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF F%IEEIrvG STKNEo CLOEM RNSIONS I I I 1 �EO�S/ETD ATM /� IWSON I SOURCESON FI14PIWR I O1/W1A G6011111LTON 4� � I lalal M mmNMcmx I III pp/LT/n H9d M I I a M1NA TEV. MY Ef5C10P1191 I I I YOIID ® AS SHOWN STE I I MA3139S I SALEM COMMON III, � n cwNRrm STREET sun.1,Me➢1BTo i I I TOG j caouxo IETTL ELhVAT10N pISTNG E1EClRICK A.-MECHANIC ROOM ON nFET FLWR RWM GN FRET'MR SOUTH ELEVATION SCOL I/H'.1'd o f4 Y4 lY-0' N'4 p qN-Y♦1�4�'NIN 1-1�2 P. ONE 2.4 YNEWLE♦O PC 807 MESS OF MIN 8 Pct X. W9GL PIPE `BE CFHIFXEO }}ee Ri1T INSNUTCX FIRMLY P/CK0 IN O N11XIN RflES}OP SYSFN. A n TeMa MNYYY F } �`P� OPENING AS A PERMANENT FORM XON,ANNU PUCE OF sWxrtNUMMSONS .LUNO wIEAALL M BE RECESSED S/1N•IS RECURRED WITHIN 1 ♦]S IXN1f1 SPURN(YP) YY w i App M FROM T P SURFACE OF FLOOR OR FROM 1HE RRESTP MTEM PIPE4�. W D") Sb Cq:NiwiE YNP ,AACWMMOOAIE THE REWIREOSUFFICES OF RON.L AS �� $UPPORIFD ONROM SIMSf-I/a Ti1EKNE55 OF RLL wMUNA- OF WYLfR➢OR ASSEMBLY 11/a[FON2-1/f f THE HOURLY F RAMNO OF THE RRESIOPBUHO 0 SYS(EY IS ECI M THE HOURLY FIRE PjppgL,Re SALMI RATING OF THE WALL ASSEYSIY IN NNICH R CONCRETE RNR 0.G WALL ASSEMBLY. IS INvL . WIlCIE9A MINIMUM 4-1/3 In.THICKNESS BOOR/ SLEEVE :ONE 2'I UyiµOW6LL5FJNKESw FlL SON OR CeNry MA ENN - NINIWi BO-I/m2 Fn. ALL (OPIIOWLJ NO MIERED PIPE.WXOUR OR EMCPWORBD MMi PSP$ROV), �2A $NIBS: MINIMUM iHICNN69 P SGWIT ro P 'ANNUL THE FIRE OF wNDS P YIN 3 In.1HICKNt§P RLL w1ERMl EON9}SIEN. A HON ANNUTA9 SPICE 01 MPU I. MCKNESSIN AN OF RUSH'AIM AS SPECIFIED IN THE T.- 5/I5 in.IS REQUIRED WITHIN }HE ME lOP SURFACE 0U .- OR S M BD.4N,MWEO WITHIN THE FlRSSTCPS41EN. PIPE COXWrt OR BO1X$IIRFIL6 P W.W. O�Illp,FWONWRHTIE tOP RACEWAY M BE RIGIDLY SUPPPIED ON SURFACE OF NE i1NR OR BOM$06 OF ME RLOR Oi WNLURIC HYMEN WI-ALAR! KiBOTH SURFACED OF ME WL ASSENBLY, HUd50II©® LnNEA INC' r unxo-t xL sPasU1 sEMSI AN sEHNIT P =101 uNERN WNL I 40 �XN FIRMLY unox / � $PFGSFAL Il]SGVM.PVC CONDUIT PENETRATION DETAIL IN NONPIPE AND ORATED PAUIT RTITIION PICKENNINIO 7HE PENNE AS APPUEDB WTHN NINUWS,FLUSH WITH DETAIL IN CONCRETE OR MASONRY A PERMWEM FORM;SEE IS BOM SURFACES OF WALL MDTONK w'ri auY FOR MINIMUM REWIRED FILL WTERML TO BE INSLWFO SUCH wYxra rmul m THICKNESS THAT A MIN 1 4 In.MON CROWN IS P�,B'RS MA MAMMON WIN.WN.1 In.THICKNESS OF FORMED .UI In. PENETRATING O Rd IN OF (`NSC' MIN.3.5 POT NERWASE DSUTATOX S W BE SIE¢PIPE BY(OR SWUM SCHEDULE 10 \. y D THE MAPPED ASWHD THE THNIAwy-PENEIRWT AND PC,PHVFY OF ME PENIIO. (OR HG.eO SIRE PIPE $ CyG SECURED M MREXER BY NEMA RI.S 34 ANO NXDUD:4Y(OR SN41F.R)El£CTRIGLL �JyC }A�NfIEL P. N CET ED ARE PACgNC F OPENING SH AND BE YETNLL NBING(EM) SPFCSFAI SE MEED 555 SEVANi. RECESSED AT MIC-DEPTHBOTH SRF CES OF INO OR 0•F RICO STEEL CCNDUR. SPEOSEAL ICI SFALWT. RECESSED FROM BTII SURFACE OF WNL RY M E PIPE OR CONDUIT E ETOL NUII W-L-989 C A4WBLY RWNRED 10 ACNYMODAE THE TeOA�EOF W AMIy PRI P UL MTOI NUMBER C-N-100 RUMORED MIDMER OF RLL IMhNAL A IF�pE��N.S�UPppI SIMLL�INBEgMH EOR F HN M OR eL�• 8?WALL &1,9RB, SEAIBLT PVCCGNCUT PENEINATION PIPE AND COMMIT PENETRATION MAIL IN GYPSUM WALLBOARD IN 2 HR NRE M1EG Ag'EYBUFS MIX]/VIAL.1HONNE54 DETAIL IN CONCRETE OR MASONRY _F\ FILL w1PV1 MPIIED MTHIN ME NIXUWA FILSH BDM /ONAL G~ SURFACES OF WNL M)OMOIDL FILL MATERIAL M BE INSEWID SUCH TALI A YIN 1/4 1,CRO'NN IS FOIAIED MROUND THE RFNEIPATXG REM. IN 1 HA FIRE RAIm ALL CORES THROUGH ELECTRIC MCf1®DumTDA Mle ASSEMBLIES,MIN E/B in.THICKNESS OF FILL W1OML APPLIED WITHIN ANNULUS ON BOTH SURFACES OF MU- ROOMS TO BE FIRE-STOPPED.ADPIONUL FILL WTFAML M BE INSTALLED SUCH TINT A RENSIONS MIN Q/a N.cRLxN Is FORMED MRouIO ME PENETRATION DETAILS PENICIND=ANDS=P12 1 N.BEYOND THE Nue N.T.S. USE FULL CONDUIT RUNS PERIPHERY OF THE OPENINO. E OPEN MASON •-Han THROUGH PENETRATIONS 55ppFF T MONO-I 12 NR sFtr3 WOO PIPE AND CONDUIT PENETRATION SPECSEN.MLI SEALANT OR DETAIL IN GYPSUM WALLBOARD 1AN/1 tYNnegaw IDwm SPE=m PUTT. 1 u1a1a rYM w a Ev.l DATE oRCPlvllox u•-n• 20--8- IV-5- p•-O- YVIw emw N M$$MDXN OLLVNIOEO$TER 1%'W.V.PIPES, =NSMD NNND/RL NO YNSRiUT(PALMED _ EMyN�PL�WpqSµALDER(11 NtDR OF NLOR OP PAEYfEO SURROUNDINGS) MA31 39S sURRNNmNDS) SALEM COMMON IX611NG REMA AmHOMO W/SHEET MIOEIEIEIO EfluxO/wALL SM SCRLws(2 PER uNISIWIT) PROPOSED MATrl•M120•-0•PANDDm OAmxG NXC, HIT x•Y1 B•LO. OR b a ;0 ; 4 FNMA,sH¢TFA SDEdBIEAT: CF]uN0/YINL NRµ13o MCXO6 OR R:, N EOUN. .T r t¢rn SAL➢A, MA 018]0 'Y tx" T�1 FNIIH.4• 4, � L wLVAMzm STIP 1%•SAUv.P100o r i s t L). r NNWR AN UNI9MR(PALMED µ[RENS HAMS COLOR OF WOS) DE'TFJLS (PNMW W."WR OF SURROUND SEPAEE ENT-3•% NDID $URROVNOX4) NIPPLE NTH 2'lB NMDXDUD ON f%IEGIOR CONDUIT RUN DETAIL TYPICAL SHELTER DETAIL scue NT$ aw 3-D'3 6 CmmuWR RNo UOIE Pfl0PoS9 IX1EN0R AtWlwlwl. EIMI �m UOUN j m U�5-no-xR-aWKY D ND W ((l r a• , (ID� O ./MWXIwD IwtlM'Nre IAY Pinnacle msca1.5 (, Gnmu•wromm� oD MvmMouxnxa N Arw ecv ,) mxoxRn1 sou AsmalmrMIIC UwrE•u�umMDuxnxD eRIDNEI am PROPDmD awTxa Hudsonm • qNOR DVIIi Roomw/08 amm1/avo H°F qmme aRDaxD WSSs�SMSD"EmowmuroR \ Mwm uu /a pro aow(F *m �awIEE P. sxs: /` ) oR A/o) INsuuTm �M,I ^_1 xe).T:MI11 SND 5• p5 0111mwq CIV_ GENERATOR DETAIL GPS MOUNTING DETAIL CABLE TRANSITION Q SHELTER l'�`0 �e mue xt.s xev:WTA wu:N.Ts �LYSiE�r{.. i°Nn�c�� urrAaD DlDlam GtE RWNED ANIEDFNI RMSIONS DIMMM9 XBIAYX16e1DZC (A IN N mPONm/f1Em G81ffi Wrfl1(tlIM S) IN IDI T USF m+y%04 xTnl Dau 1 nro o W-o•o.a) ,nAI+ m,aWmn,Pew9m w wP W'IE TRAY NTX s• y,a,a 1Cp tlXplpC:px auxo swcuroPw om VA t o , muv wR AXW FA41q ro!a✓A wlm x�ln DDwN aIlP9 AND]/B'Y dLY.MRU 9aLT5 11Y PF SF}Pm19 Y-0' PRNaSED SUM 'g J�'i FtV. WE gYMPIKN DC.NN AT Ill DMC mlreR SURRENUMB 0 W e'I y TIN I) MomL NUNBW' or ya=TRAr(sec xare 1) ace-le-eo-le-m vara As sXawu DIMENso." j Hb.OYd.I'M PROM50 8R.-,,, MA31 39S sw¢Pure muuFaaxs: RmF �ro amore KA,to xn.e•.wmota 1pd SALEM COMMON MDT ro ROOF YBIeRWFq MCNP F we sw 3)M /yJ M�(e)y91Y1£CUP FA91wa S-(.1)[A SIRIKE90R8]D-VI SkE vaunae Oi ownxo ro m: 9URDE PkblmlhE Dfl1tE ZI CI . w SRiEET XmE: SPmA®6Y WXSIMMnaY MYNDPA SIlF]A� M4 01810 MWw PER WNUFI RER'S ,nm Nom' SPELIFlGTDIS. 1. TC 61fIDm6 FlYID NIIX NOTE: MDUM PFA MW UFILiamA'9 96fL®F.' DaNCTQ14 FRAY W- . MDUM PER WAUFA REWS WWMI MN& 1PEC61GTaN3. ANTENNA DETAIL CABLE TRAY DETAIL DC SURGE SUPPRESSOR DETAIL RRH DETAIL DETAILS W.—,X.TS aGYE'ALS SC.VL N.i.S 1GUE'RT.% A-4 5 c�SEiT Y ' N ZO Y kiJra 'J ®® C.+ o qg eid MO Z T M w � tt all ' wc_ a , s w IM %qyQy 8 5g,13 12 yy gg u 9e � g� g .a W W W W W i.IF.1 q® I ® � m sxnmm IUD e ] I w W w I C5W1J SI�Y I W b � � alnnlm MIu9v to D i SNnrtIW' ISIz3 A T — i I I I y Z 3 3 a E � w w Rt.l Sg 6 WE r8 e y i€ I If N p_ q e pp� yygg a s 9 @ �& � pgg �df lo gill �il 1 ya@i9� �1 11 3'y �`ipppQQ Eqq xx$¢$¢ 88E�§ai �Ri �PE l�! �3 "ee yy pp � Q g77 "5 b yqq � aa Eg q kY� gp 8 E 48 9 Y{ Y� 4 `4 Y b y 8 C s 6ai 3 Op @R d' 4. E z 3{@ 8 @ a@ R $ g - 31 � � NM gy N. q Y58S. R _oll g§°il 9s{ e €' f 1g _ $1 s@ Y 5R4 �Y @ 'g $ @Y@ b g� •egb�gg ■gq�g $1°W1 � 55 ;!111111 Y � a � to', 3 3€ EMgYa 89 `Y ® 1 Q ga Y£ a Yah T �� , 8 gild p�3Hg@ h€-yp3 5g �@ Y$" SR 663 1�$w Fpp ®y �4s�#yy3� Ria ggggyga93 % Y � 46 £A ��31a 3 $1Y ^ £ R a Y a88�e . a2E a4 � a P§ s� 5nEEIW'< _ SSiiG� � R VIS! Nag' E_� a_ 3 Y4 _ 12Y ru/1E• MPBOPas2n ePwmwmPosNeD OF�DRAL r a]'�aY•)�' PIP3 1REwCEP1 6Ef5oIkmIIR eusu1xl 4 1sBB1EU/ w4' UMMeVkAmf]Aw]IWwOVDxLPawIgmiLPrlwR9EeI.FOan�lM]WeCCt<owf 6dDexYsm1DrwD ut ( Pmmw,m+B� PRarcamFR4IM (aW)pP.) (D mPmm] Pinacle_ __ wBar v)J09.Im IMpeny[ x/ Po ] EQ)(Y.) IC PPm Wm0 Hudson I I W 16 xv � W WReiE wvms w a eOF— afwTMxx -- CONNECTION DETAIL s W10x19 CONNECTION DETAIL M C _J ® xuma..wwm • a C-Y C-1' P-Y I'-V 0 0'-S 4® iA�p`SH 0( M1lgs�,Cy ]'d' I`ANIEL P. G il µ11GLB.n'uJ ,A•SN. PROR90 a1+ YSTEEL STAIR DETAIL n.Br 0.a)PIPE 0amxuaaro�WxmMRmrMBD Boum ro s FRN11maue I-ryREfFP ro snwcluwa uaursls L)b1+/4' P�uR 2aR eEN slu) C x: Dm9x 0muv,uc PRWOS®[J1d1+/4r4 ra r4 WRD.EAUG=20.mu (1a•uRw) Pmr +1u/ Aff PmPmmr 111e0u]cnr 0P 1xe s1m a1u]wa oxlo E E IR SED EREvrosuPPORr0wnm/1B-w-4 �sDn muRIE PROPosm EwIPRBvr. (�aR�mox) MT umsm Dwx2N art PBromEn f1*Pj 3 W LOW u•Mrt/4' RfA510N5 + + a (a•uxw)(m) sm.".as a caxx o w PRoroan sm aE,u �i1 W8x10 CONNECTION DETAIL x0 auc` s P1AtE�• w.w MR BP MZE) s-] scue T.r-v Incl alullu+Iw Im® so n,Bx�0 r-D• aRa HANDRAIL Imo—lux.—'I'wx.'Io 0-r 0-� a' I vlau rm wlenlucllw ' ( CONNECTION DETAIL r.1e x.]s D I we IRv.Ew I I s] wY.s ala osscwma W mR Bow MW S_ PmPogB 1m BB Bm B U Pux F--�—� wwPoseo wlxu �yyB• elan PRaPoosm ear Iv]s] ]/rP FOR wla mRm •+nv FOR wla,R MA3139S mRxB�xa MR BW S= SALEM COMMON MW A r U0 xuww m �� PRDP08� 0 SOL vRmoMP) (1svn� O MP PmPaED 18•Sw. x.WpUB BPIIEE fi ,.,..... '1)CWeQIQt SfPFE! (t.W 0.C.)FWE (/9 Rm m) SPIECA,Al0 019ro PmPW28 roE BOND �1 F (PRCMRC )Wv 1oP a DRw1W �TTJ ...i roe eam sous TYPICAL ANGLE TO BEAM STEEL FRAME DETAILS _ atvenon s W12x CONNECTION DETAIL �e1 CONNECTION DETAIL 5-] SCNL T•1-V Y.T-V [�HANDRAIL DETAIL 5-a eDxL x.ts o B-Y CT wd f-0' o B-Y w-4' Bd I'4 S� S at&t V H to smlORM O OUP, l mPALRY R TIE/LCusr 20,' FOR SA' CComYre Ry0 NR OF 0 gyyppwy.w olAl W PR OIDED EIEE ro SVPPORr TIE PR.'POSm mUIPNEM. TOP 0, �< Pinnacle Wireless I1411eBNL VMek4111HLL5E1ML6 Bm AWB NO cT O%N8 4 y, Mt4SP,Cf OtmS - - 11O/10' PM1P05m d1aFR 1C 6OII 0.4810-ONN OM14V0/1Y�Kti (OR NPPOh➢FD 1 4Hudson b PpOPOftD Na Tull/4' 1�i11 .r___ (LppM vl.iJ r s r�. weer N41S PROPJ9E910110Y:IIB' �re,weri�W � ITE¢PUTe Of PROPasm u5a4• g 1j J WN(i6n1E PAv➢B �_ _� _ __L a CONCRI D tR1t1'SQ' b®3 RUwd wipe � — � S � BASE PLATE DETAIL - s-4 swe I-t •P-tl CI 0 0.470 e,-e• o v.•tla' T-4• Y-tl 'RAS7Et� �e- (4 iRTM9,n'aE) STEEL STAIR WITH LANDING DETAIL uxxsm BsoRw Ore a tle'l--�4 FMSIONS 9 1/M/1 OT6IPWMM I� 4• 1 m 11!/10' Llyl)Im osVAUcfa �y arta a4rom-MIDo aenvl DaRu we a„n aamw lla-w-4 lay.I Ort oraevamm MI/Y 7 (OR NW1QK0 EC.VL) 1BOUT(Tl0 Wt11e mvw w AS AIGMN -TITm Ir _r s PROP09m Ila -- -- S Ob1,/.• ism SALEMEM CO COMMON (IFN4T1 V.I F� --- --- PI0mP 41awr m e/4Y 31FII RATi hL'D BOLT(hP.) l lmm 27 ClW21FR SRiF£f W0et0PROPL® C1J SeIF)A,MO 018]0 mmlee 8{' J/4• SMeUBIf 9) TOP PLATE DETAIL ��CONNECTION DETAIL STEEL FELINE LEfNLS E-4 bC,11L S.1'-C 9-4 SCLLL Y•1'-0' O o'-Y Ca�Cd 1'4 O tl-Y?® S-4 PImW40 J/B' 1Y 1111cN wFH ARFFNm }p J 906 m 14 PRCIOHD SIEt1 BFIII %i0PO5E0 l° Y W r oxxTu2 pW (9 9+FF1 PPNYNC 12NI KI ' O O fRVIWOWL.W Olmt PVH MR IFIL SHE) 9ft¢P� 12W Rkta Exlmxc PAPAPLT B e° pllll1i1G1C PROPORE)Ills >r Im. a Wirelevs awkt/a• �Mse -_ _ _—_ _ Ra+cIN va.iJ jlYwitmii vJ.PJ b InaPmID _ — — ImO.Kc1 Om„wro J IXlsnxc RODE am IM®WL Plnr RVA Isar 1bI �' srsrtN(VI PRJPO9F0 R/w4 aww/a' 7 - b 6 OWII(6 SOLL PIR -e T9. (IFHNN V.LF.) RJOi WI1UiM1.11RPR'4 _ IremwLlanw - ® - m. D Q Hudson L +xDRK Rup b P.mcwm e Mft UmJ 6 MON, OJ iAOPnvn J a Z nlc W MO Mft l+RI.)n1 HU mr�lw WAIFHNH-sue' KI HI PROPOsm J aY WN.dIF➢YQR bN6VE-J-]/I' MPJ n ExISnNO D.NCROTE MIN'°131nM°re J BASE PLATE DETAIL Win Hrt�OIn ��BASE PLATE DETAIL 4 ROOF DECK ") 5-3 OZ:Y.1-p JOIM1SttE->-]/I• 5-Y SGUE:Y.1'-p i�4' C5' e MW.FHBELYIENI f AMEL P. j� NRLIxFORCEO D O-Y p® .) D p-Y I® CONCRETE M CDlE cOLVLx 4 /a0 STUB-UP OVER +Y° ]5WRDS_ s-Y PARAPET+tT.eom+x soal mmPikakl/ma' 1-1/r mrMN® aRPnm T6 ft r uc1lMsss/nrI aRErxuNaLSnIEemN 39.. >1aYs WU69 LP. MR. m ,xf 140ta + W74x30 %=w *' RwVSPre➢ pI u1u1.+Foe a1oK T I J M awl,/a' m mmlR PROPOSED J aY PROPO9FD aY a u rssm we awv AINs a w (1zvmN vex.) Mre(txn.) •JYI IOL* .) ♦vn aOLr(++s.) 14 tm. REv.i wrz oLsavnox Exlsnxc ROOF �..`l A<009FD •cw,M tx' tp w11a9 �� is sxwx 5 Eu IVIF) —1 •bYK PER OJOi m!CCMM m r r r ,-t/r r ,-,/a• vmu Ik, J°"� MA3139S ° u w�"I'ft —r PRamFnNse SALEM COMMON O O akak,p• ® O z e e ,. m. 1a __j_ ® F (OmMuIK v1F.) _ —i s�em27 ANIOSED 3/lY -a a IXISiINC am°� �1 CN041QV$IAFEr SNIIX (1fA0111 vAi.) PgOPO3E0 SNF]A.W\OIIrO HIM Pur--imm a '' ooi o¢cK TMP. t W14x22wtxaa PRaPo9m w,sas W14x22 IklawGe. ' -yJ�- �t//aY P PFFD 91E¢P re H12i-10C MR MPJeJIlmutxr '< •< mroowASE/iY �JYI IST(1rP.1 .WRs MT MPJ m,. PUTS M.) t a SMELFRPMEDETAILS Sxlsnxc REwioxcE° ROpf ro smuauRLL Axures corvcRFil wwNx �zZ STUB-UP OVER COLUMN wO NuomN DEnox cROw.m �i1 TOP PLATE DETAIL �Il TOP PLATE DETAIL S, SCUE:f-I/Y.I'-V MR4.WDV9I 10.]O1J 5-3 ffJIF:Y�Y-p 9-2 SOMI Y.1'-p . FOR n1E WILI1'I OF THE ® FLDIIW IIRUC m TO IPMENI.SUPNR1' ® ® PROPOSED OD 0 Y-Y Y,F V$ I'd MID wl vV 14 - PoP� at&t NsmTax MauMm ESIsrINc coxCRETE uxsmMr(T'P.OF )� mo raMRRMre Nn PwwEr RUMPMxRM.w Rim+ 1 DDrxnET Pinnacle )P RG r E ewclar PROPoSEM RRW WOUN= Vi�ireless ON liras OW.OF n eoo RM�lul.PPltu'slt +n wrygA f' _ _ PPoNsfD nn umNw wlNmxry n DOA3 „1., (PNM ro wToq PROPOS®P+000 PROPGS♦D RSR uxamur prP.) wwaolart BOX 6 -- - MDUNIEo AN uxmMrt Hudson® ' n � 0 _- PRDPMSFL aY.• �6�� PRONE® � �.FlIIYD PR' �a wnw�' S- wpNsm)r SN. f+�.l a slRsm MPa tN of V,, YE'u. KPE PANEL P. RROPoSCO ON3tE M!I ti 9R EXISTNG ILK MY Cl _ .1 of 0,4 0 /DNAI \ PRaPoSEo� STEEPER \�� umsm wmlirm lire MnNG METFL PNNSm RUSIONS suD FRNND MD NQ m EF dam: ALPHA&BETA SECTOR RRH&SURGE RHEA TO SMAC M YSS Em Nuosox DESIDx GROUP, uc ARRESTOR MOUNTING DETAIL DxT m:RNGusr-D,sola s-a zuL x.us �i1 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL Pm THE cxPr W OF THE 4-9 SNL I'•T-C rMWmO RRUCNRFS TO SV.Po THE PRCPDSED MIPMEM. T/�/I aFlfl�euRNl lmlm 0D D41�-0' 0 Cx/ia/ii O9FU WId PSP69F0 RRN PROPOSED SUM Rfl'. WTF ODUM XW M.OF 0) ARRESTOR(M.OF PS1Po9F➢6/BY M E ROD Iwl+o ®w /s sxmm YITN M r HM1-MIEO MIQSM pppppSEy NWRCMK PRWOSFD KM PKWU CONCRETE Q 1 �W ONPER NDIW UX6TNI MP.) W191WI(IW.) Fes. d Pm.0, +MR uv Du* y° �,P�" Ow MA3139S �= T"0'°P E PEN'`N� SALEM COMMON ad I (INNDs'wN�m)(�rvPJ+/N• PRwDSFn Mrxm II PRCP"iSEO Sc1E1Aiw oty e� a evar SPN:m) I' s eaar EIMLm) a:10'0.0.1 pK ANTENNA,RRH&SURGE GAMMA SECTOR RRH&SURGE ARRESTOR MOUNTING �\CONNECTION DETAIL �x1 ARRESTOR MOUNTING DETAIL DETAILS s-s SRIL r.+'-r s-s rue.I-Ip••r-r //11 GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATION 2000A PANELSOARD SCHEDULE III N1.Y.t Nu Ilam Y.t 1w wn�wr'�1u olml 41v INu 1141 41.111.Y.t 1. �(( N.INa"I Na IN°,Y.t ' PinnaG'I.e ON WI3CIC]I]i BHIp: I RNE. SFRJICtS mmIM emnnmm ra>O.mu xr°.-p awe11 1°A QWOI .N 41a 41.Y.t Na 1.4.t DO NgRSwIwL�REls9 QwD uNrt/ RFnn¢n N OR III.Y.t 311a 111.,Y.9 SORSES 10 N• ° • Iww 41a 111.I., oil 111m.Y.t imnm 1. p Sp RE •• OR 1m w mem n rROD1®11'zR M 41a 111.Yrt N1a 111.Yrt Isom l• 1 w NI°, um ulmw mra mumy1v V1.Y.t �° un INv l/1.Y.t mmmNo S,°mvluv anis^ nmv ln'°am la^iww 41v IIIA Yrt y1v 111m.Y.t mm RUXUppb3 ROILS: Oz lloo t 1Ni V1.Y•x .xrmmI ED •m•� m CONIFACfOR TO COORDINATE Nlv Vlaa 1t Ri 111.N.T SOURCE PgN6 FOE gTBi PDWEP NOTE. •.✓ RE lsun °w wnx uxG.NB.S L2LTROUN PROPOSED EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE BE",v RZ yw® z.CONIRV:IOR TO PROVIDE Vi SOU CONI0.KIOR Is m YFAIFr INCH ATYi FIRE NMM WIM SIZE(IXCXE$) S1fJl1 INPII! K SiBgEVtEq W BNF EP KIULL EpUIPMENT UE.E,INST/11NbN .1I Tp-nr hm m�1 GOT BUIWINO TRE AURM Ml TO BE "WE OF BAIPNFN! (L9S) Pop. SIZE SIZE w11X PIX WLLE/ATBi PRIOR TO OROERINO CCORGINAEO WIIX TXE VNDLORD OM MOTN NEIL. (mm) (ANpS) ... KPIU 24/18 MC POWER Sl51EM 30.] 15.8 • S. 120/2M/3W VAC ]W R. 'U.N.AVD I..OW T...1 Tvss AS NEEDED...G.1 TVSS TO SURGE oRES10R 1-!F SE, ERIC550N BBOT 11 13 •2.0 32 -18 OC - Iv11A YOB GO 4RGUNGED EOUIPMFM'RAIL URISm E. GlF uoi 13]-BSM TPM'SISM W/BO 1t.ECB-M-BO-RN ISS 18.8 .].] - -a8 OC - I.E. ], ALL ENI TO BE TER.G.qi AMP NSEG DERONNE..7DRI TIE RBS FNO E}ERILSSON. 11 Cpl A95OlyIE III 10.28 1B.]8 •]B.]e ]Ip0 -RA OC _ _ ERNSIONS2/B, 1/IW IX m 9XFLI FF POSED 6D MEl£CIRGL PNIEL NEW CISFUM DENf1UtOR nUUQN, SHISBPAYEP.1R0/111N.1X,]W iRv1R8WTNERPRRINc SAES PEA RESUP LIE WYUFKNZoG WTC iW 3w2 BBE WG IN (N BE 9UPPIlEOspECIHGTONSJR00 AYP, D,SW(LO BE IXO INSTNIID B!WMPILIOR)9UPRlFD B!WXR/{TOR) RD, 1211218'WGIXERPRWf _ Py1y Bpx 1 lO,; ,.XGTER 1, GgOUND fgRl TD PgOP05EO ORDUND NOR 3 13. S1 C EWACEA IN]/1'C 3. OROVNO EENERATOR TO PROPOSED STEEL w]0 •®n �. N " FORE WIIX 2/z AWL GROUND WIRES s/B/G, IDG w ft 8114 IN 3/aro MA3139S (CONTROL WIRING) ExrTI„L srKxm LLGSETs SALEM COMMON 112GrIDIOM GROUND Ona To cpxourt TO min"wATu GORE DRILL DOREKARS) s 2-D sot:eo�: (rm.Au F1DGs) Puu APES(TElLO) �c✓vv¢pR�( ]N/D.IND 1x z'c 3µL0 ° ° ° ° POWER&TELCO RISER TA➢Irmo uxe smc Exrsnxc wg1ER N CT.xFTS 2.ANN 2-Pmt N M u.c.B. M01X DWGRMA,PANEL SN...METER SCHEDULE B NOTESOCNEf PFA..". � GT. REXIRIIHO IELCp EOUIREMEHR ExmIS INEAAgFIN OENAPC IW a xze M ExIsr4L MNx DImRIBLnGN P.NEL POWER&TELCO RISER DIAGRAM E 2.0.34.1 MVX cIRCPVR 9�R.G% E. OG X.T.S FOR CONDUIT PFNEIROTON DETNIS SEE SHECT q-1 at&t Pinnnacl c e �N � Wifeless p MA4514ll PHFI£5 PON VNP� MNpSpP.Cf pBGYB �p ALARM TERMINAL CABINET °TC"WIRING DETAIL G n.}.S (R)olo k(1)IID c w v.wd.I>e N,N.NNdo dll.o. da and IN s/rC PEP RErnnm (B)/I:'N It (E)PSY-BW h gpuy Pmun�•igo¢iu pa iu xuy wixu (I)nBEA 11NE(IN 3' ♦ uµ1r�ywTM wi M w�oz1 dross¢uaimrt (1)P95B-BW r#0 NME cPEEN Nn EN CR]H NVR GN O�////-INSVUlE9 1p X40 V/ppF}GP ONO�cn SSB/0 Y t�ep IN R'L fGG PgpPpSEp Bp kM Gw/1lPrL iP. ro$VPGE SVPPPFSMR fl£C CLHNECIIGH —� pEXEM}pq o�R(ielxB-vc-lob uBo¢m Xloxem arz r 1 nGER zags spd, MWN wxX RENSIONS T. N. m R®BBBI c%'Cp }p X NNA L---__J nem/Du f3f1�N..=4P----- -- 1..pgouxp .1,XR eR.N R W.IINJ FEQUIN. s/c }p xce pAyGo PULE 14PI.fAJRpI W}E wnx ILrx unlet u}s uals CGMP.IM1Y 5/N IDDI ID D P I Pm., p6CRMWN }0.W Sim AWN PPGPoSF➢Mcg . CPs Rm. yyiyy 1®n m A5 SXtAN S H PLMEN PBs PKK JM N.N IN...E vgpRbm upe a rvxf Up MA3139S t wxouP SALEM COMMON �_aRounD PIXc wnx Puusmiva ro q:snxc 5o[ev� �rzlcliwKlu L-------------J rtmo oEuwrc edP C:EW. PROMSEp 2w/I.vIL 1P, N5 13 goN 2 py -$(Rf£} �B IML TMH SIIL.VGE➢ JW PmElBpxro PANEL V R MON 501FA5 AN 019}f) COPPER POV/MCu 9ICS]O<E ro xm SpwltuENr4 ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC aPcuxp Bus BALARM WIRING DETAIL 02 ewe nINN sIPµD. ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC CoPPFA ¢NG N.l$ Flf RICK GROUNDING NOTES. DDR "�"" �✓at&t GROUNDING LEGEND COYPRE4MN ME mNNECIWN ��l P � ExtldERWC ME mNXEC110H "d � Pinnate MDPmm ATM TR IMEm PRDPDP DW ---- DRWNgNO COXWCIOP M]IIMm TD B�CI®DMD MM ,ma�um"�wDDorRmd mwm UMek(YORLLYAIME^. �hP � JI wAPu Doxwc a �� cRDuxowD D,P mo YVSWL Press RVA 'pA �"� vnr.mX a omm 3 'weA1O°" oalxrx PmPmm mmtlOXi`wumrxxma'� mN omiw BAT,EID'Rmx _ vc.m n.mn Hudson _ PROPO6m uYR Ni moawoa<mmert PmP05m CD "'°N rowm Marosm ewe --i1 `—_ RMPmRPoSm lR No •`xx`�enmw io,�°'°'�i x tH OF MSS u&Dm(tYP.) _._� 'uumXeRueMO wn �EP�a S9�y o RP@OtPObm Ri aauvcroa aix�a Pm n I`ANIEL P. N J11Tt N m PRCPLSm eax �""°xOmB1°' n"tl11w°Mi SSIONAI EtF'.e�" NR PRDPd® PRJPLbED um mv¢T m tCF160)dWiFm dft HIb XY,Luu�urc`^A!P daPxx�aA amuxD cexnnr m is°bi%nAmra o�'m"m"m usa Ip0 RENSIOYS PDOSMD WARP YAq M AT IIPPEP PWPJSm 9FCIDR PRDP AT&T �P n0 n s Memw AT CLN% PqD OFWxD dA ANRXR, mwLtuuw'®wn MO AT IIMYFR �MII ��rmG vw w[� WB AT m91E � rxAr AT YMtA Y w�N,m c@&�&lenxx AT NIDP MY aaAn ion wm MTE' DFEIAPIYrI IT P AT&T D ATM sPaPmm me mxom min �a� Aa wmvN osNsuTDx ro auun PRAYE s�wa TD smIOR oADNID BA!DR MDM ATM taAm mAT nmc rPAr PIM c".) MA3139S PPOPO9m:ATTW SALEM COMMON R&P mR BM MDPDsm ATM suM mATW DR .. crm.) AIwc41DP ]2tlVRIER 51RFST (OP.) SVFJA,MA 0,8]0 som Au ecw TD ""— TYPICAL SECTOR GROUNDING PLAN s� eEw DDNNmROm --_ AT iuxm Ym scuc x.Ts AT GROUNDING PIAN 8 NOTES EF9 ERI MW VSm ATM GROUNDING PLAN rue xTs G—1 �. at&t of , H I3'TO 3x' m /I6z H �(G AN,wM : : 4� Pinnacle GB1E e1 6 Wireless p eW0 FROM US INIEIIN o d° e - - TD �GROUND xR a�° VnRek0.LBLL3JMC6wMmy EWRMwi ] 1'e I m]µV WNC UIp p.—�3A wGTXwvR `9 MrA£pt pr DB'VS ORT USE NOTE 3I 1[cwp GROUND W ,. COPPER GROUND&A, I/EV W'e3A',BY nwION ,I, GROUND xR ON UND $TEWpfD RSNMI OR INEIRUMFM CO.OR EQUA-HOLE CwRR9 To LaPPw OFWno WIIE ON M'IFNIN WATCH NEAN WUBIE LUD CONSGUMRON.IC ' Hudson UOIZ; o0 TO OBOUND TONEV GROUND MR SIDE Wfu v WED ON xuuGo yaGmP ®� BIP)(SEE NOTE 1 s 3) OF GROUND CONN2TONs) O O 1 INS"TO NVITON INSTRUMENT GT.NO. NOTEI 3061-4 oR DOD& ru�nAr 1.DO NOR INST1 GBIf GROUND NIM AT 6 BEND AND&WAIS DIRECT GROUND WRE ].6/B'LOCWNAb1ERS OR EWK WRR TO GROUND W. 1 CROUNDINO HR SWLL BE TPE AXD PARI SOONER" WEID,OR GROUND CONDUCTOR {. WNL MGUNRNO 81C .NESTOR INSTRUMENT HUMBER G SUPPUEO E C.0 ART TND HOLE LUG TO BE SHAu Be WMINAM CO.GT.NO,A-WB6 OR EOWL B!GER WW PUERw. USED WHJ2 AWG BCW WHEN GROUND BAR TO WILGIN�SEP. IB VIERXIGILx B. 6/8-111'HHS BXTi,NIDMH INSIMIMFM CO. �y T�A��NffIEL P. y I WUTHER PROGNNO SWLL BE Tllo-PW GROUND OR GROUND BONOEO ttl NET& GT.X0.]013-I GRI EQUAL TWE SUPPUEO WTIH KR.CORD SHRINx RING TONER/}TpHOPoIF SNLLL NET BE USED. SGRUCIURE 0. pRECRYRT)SH41 BE ELMINAIEO WXw 6OXpIXD CI CONNECMN 10 TOWER/O MO-PG SIRUCNRE O 4 JeO CONNECTION OF GPS INSTALLATION OF GROUND S.BE PER wNLr;cruRERB REwNuwGnoNB CABLE GROUND KIT WIRE TO GROUND BAR GROUND BAR DETAIL �'ioeaL ' sCLLL xIS EGYE KM GOING N.T.S. UCEISD EIWJIRA MlE Rlmslaus ♦ Kam 3 DIM/,°wvnuxTa'R'.® mnGFD Gy SgEpC11HI°61oES° COM PDRr sIm_ , IVI6nI'a W11H/OC(INSIIIATfD) BE UN.Na Nrt HSN GBE Lilf�S9M IFRXIXN Ii 9ff A9 RV. WiE ®� CFlW1 3G Awo IxSUu wOWI W OWG RDUNOwG M10 TT W/ SURGE FROiFGIOR ORDERS GIP xpx-uEiwc ENS aPIEUm BAS-rs Imxn 6 C14M: ➢EYdim k�A SMN 0.GRiOU6XH�£Y IW,IaY AS sHowX XBID BD:ro S.4, 5 e® 4WI WA91Gt MT WAGNER.TP. ` �,�,MT GGE MGB B0.T-Ile SEE17GE=0 SON MA3139S (n#3�GIN mGRE =mD"'R SALEM COMMON It,BMDEoro OpYND ORqwA,w wux QUETIE,T s e wwwmm GROUNDING'DHE IGT m 1BmIIR uI1MWI�N'L xD O Ba ro BaT PAN. PAH6 nU1NIT RECKN GRM-1 1m) GROUND BNI SRiE£f I.I. wSlxC UHM YplwxC'OE mat"IG TWTRUBS D. 11MA EGIIIPNENT RWN S.ptlIX NI4BI11X0 fFNYRND RI¢um Il NLUSMTMS °'"UPOS PUR U.m WEP EW.ND u4& v Wn wSm RFE gGxSBIW GY TRE NW/*.,TYPICAL GROUND BAR OR GAG-TC�RO G"` GROUNDING RISER GROUNDING RISER DIAGRAM CONNECTION DETAIL WATER MAIN GROUNDING DIAGRAM&OEFAILS YNC HIS. SGIIE x.Ts X.AIE'xls s0[D¢ G-2 �j at&t w , � I o �T I I I Yn11Pinnac�e Pte, W' ele is mncvM mPI I'I O •'W'RsMW=,a OXIDE,ung/ Exlmxc emmwc r • ICC"I N TCN n ® E imxo M mo s um IrI wu MI.) PROPDSm 11'-8V10'-0' III j rOx 91m Prn.L snEEiw j III I.,Do YIR'VOIM :. . III DN, �U51w I ❑ XI STFELMP4ifOPM EODIPMEM �•`.°S ' RpPoSm ATM EINPYEM III w SxEL1FA IC65 DOIR III ro RRxY MP ®I III Ex5TIND r I 11®®ExDINEER Er.- -- TE PENMOIIEE H 1 ® URNSIONS- FROP=SIE6 A E I I PROP09D ATIi REIw PENEIMMx f9R W PRroosm r uxoER MUCNREP.M. M!T DENEMmR 1PPROxIMPTEauD OPON SRII iR& )m CM I ISDNC STMNEO CL05E15U. PRCPG56 OWRO_L FWE X.N. IM,IF a®n AS SIpvM NY LID. ®i S.UPEDDsrTO.a.IN00ofnlM flux MA3139S I wER EaaRiaL EwIPIIEMJ SALEM COMMON i / PPam:.s•Gf Iffi+E PROS R'MM WS4l�'0� O 18T iNDM CERIN°M .1.1D IAW PRESSOR4 9VfT UP RI ROOF..DAS SERNCE , / Ol5 OODSIER = : I J PROPoSm 3.5•W9 IMI () �5• I /LxImNC uCCNn4ID4. wEC14WIOV.RW4. $RLfM.Rp 019)0 0- �I I � ✓ R004 ON f1R5T fLWfl U1 L' DOORD. N _ PO w Mem)m O O GAS PLAN + _t \�- _I_-LEN.H(_G/9_m_ _..I ® LOq PR SYNE Nd GS M.)Po YBX CWRDuuTE WITH w Co. . ..fH MEIFP PCP IX1311XO GS .m Exlmxc w uMER UNDER' Ruw.Hur GAS SERVICE �\EUI..NM WATER cxlsxxc EIIR N 1 ROOF PLAN _, PIRm rlmR nreHwc ROIM ON i1R51 FLO°R ]/I B'�1'-0• D Y-0'S'-1' ,Cd IY-0 �_ 1 r�—— n.unmxn,c NOTFS at&t rtiom "a9a sas�mn amo�� m wa,a ate. ��o Wiscicve a mas== � pp�f��I�� J 0 WASVNL PXEIP9 RYL IINrt/ .T-m -- e - mrc¢n wrm¢e®mo. emwuuemamrm MNOSOR R 09485 CFICMIC RFGTRAINTS FAR (:FNFRdTDR - xta a num�ve an®.�e eauz�rem m.mnwr rmm.evwenw ewvwa�wr�m m.a.P ..aa..aa a.,e .�.�aa�.,au.,,ux � � � a w:.��s,aa a..m.a...a..iweo.aaaamum: .a.,""wo �•o '"'n0°'=" �� yt={pyo � �� e 1�9]lBtiR CAB BDCHIffii 9YbT®6 ffil�S2CATiQi ��LLYY ttJJ ryi u� � �h `TYPICAL WALL PENETRATION DETAIL �1 �11 �^6aniai ..........=e=. _,_ •__ a ._. P15°"a"'PO"'°OSOBPu ' T x�ue1741i- _ RRMSIONS � vawmmura AL SEISMIC DUALS FOR SWAY BRACING � Wr- U. x N may a�mma�mmaam a.mm�uuua vu�a mwo mmanw au a, n®.�,: �me:am�woaausmmmmu..urv�uss.mws,n�... o mmx cwmn TTT vmno nn.1 mrz osaRimrox urnex REFWNJPPORT ®um�nm,.s,m axw®am.. a®'m�°m'm-.�u�mna.p ao®.:wevmm umsm�u wia o�mn � ns swan MA3139S SALEM COMMON B¢apets �ecam�r� 2>CHM1RiFIt SBE£! °"maea sung nn otBTo ""�"° m.emm 36- a.w a+m DETAILS GASGARISEGRAMe � P_/] at&t sw cowmPrz Rw0 /wuwwM,w o1m1 a, Pinnacle Wireless ' UMek01aHLL 9Sh1L6mrymy f°]IAVOIYL VlF1K 10`D.W(/21 IMNCF/'ry- CT OWH oa/lR .�/w6 Hudson®® +we wv ^weum / p-------- GU I U ..GUIURL RUTURF S2'2 PANIEL B ryN 2� MI G CI '_ ssioNu�,�eh' ;_f'� — IICQSO EX0.YRR MlC � d RENSI MS "19m' _ 1/sn wxslwcrw av,� ..wrs.we.r 1 v1al+nw mxmwnRw r .Rx.>mx o 1 mMn m.mow.. I .a,� .. ..m .Rx.nm REv.I art uummoM so[ws MA3139S N=ff SALEM COMMON 1. 0.WiR VM M C SRM ALL PMM Z INVI N EWIPMENT RI MMULAMM'S ME MENDAIWS RJ CWFIFR$IiREf RF PLUMBING DIAGRAM "' "v'01BT0 Nf NT.6 same RF PLUMBING DV+GRMA Y 27 CHARTER STREET 548-14 GIS#: 560 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map: 35 Block: - CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0272 Category: Antennas Pe1lrilt# 548.14- BUILDING PERMIT Project# JS-2014-001198 Est. Cost: $3,500.00 Fee Charged: $390.00 Balance Due: $.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const. Class: Contractor: License: Expires: Use Group: EAST COAST COMMUNICATIONS Lot SizZoning: q ft.) 26488.836 Owner: SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Zomng: Units Gained: Applicant: EAST COAST COMMUNICATIONS Units Lost: #I AT: 27 CHARTER STREET Dig Safe#: ISSUED ON. 21-Ian-2014 AMENDED ON. 20-Feb-2014 EXPIRES ON: 21-Jul-2014 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS &RADIOS FOR CELL SERVICE TRANSMISSION. INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT SHELTER. NOTE: CHANGE OF CONTRACTORS 02/20/2014 POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Electric Gas Plumbing Building Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation: Service: Meter: Footings: linugh: Rough: Rough: Foundation: Final: Final: Final Rough Frame: Fireplace/Chimney: D.P.W. Fire Health Insulation: Meter: Oil: Final: l louse# Smoke: Treasury: Water: Alarm: Assessor Sewer: Sprinklers: Final: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: h3ro. BUILDING REC-2014-001206 21-Jan-14 7141 $390.00 GeoTMS©2014 Des Lam'iers Municipal Solutions,Inc. "The Best Jor Tomorrow—IIn ough Excellence in Design Today" PARALLEL ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES, INC. Bus: 1.603.772.14// Fax: 1.603.772.1413 Date: June 11,2005 Naugle Engineering Inc. 11 Sylvan Street Danvers, MA 01923 Attn: Mr. Gary Nangle 1.978.777.7650/1.978.777.7653 Rev. 0.0 Cc n/a Subiect: Salem Housing Authority-Site Visit-Electrical Conduit Concrete Encasement Parallel's Proiect(s) #PA05NE-02a Friday, June 10, 2005 I visited the site at Salem Housing Authority, Electrical Room 121 to inspect the support system for the steel conduit that will be in-filled with concrete according to the attached sketch SK-1 dated 6/9/05. The existing conduit and hangers will safely support the added weight of the concrete when completed according to the sketch. Essentially,the conduit will be lined with P'thick foam to reduce the amount of concrete required.Note that foam lining of the bottom of the steel trough is optional. Sufficient concrete around the electrical conduits must meet code fire proofing requirements which means the conduits must be reasonably bundled together and centered. If you have any questions, need for clarification or more detail on the above,please call at 1.603.772.1411 or fax us at 1.603.772.1413;e-mail—g_ar ooceanimation.com; website—parallelassociates.com. Sincerely, Gary E.Tilton,PE SE o r1 + -uas`+� � U l el Ez Nnr%sopUl MWIM30 31813313 W31VS 30 1110 02a-Rpt01-061105—ConduitSiteReport.doc October 11, 2000 Salem Housing Authority 27 Charter Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. McGown, This letter is to call attention to an issue that may have been overlooked. It is now early October and the mini ramp has not been fixed yet. It was noted at the last inspection that the Housing Authority conducted. The ramp is located at the only accessible entrance door which is the on the side that I use for an entrance. This ramp needs to be structurally reinforced. This project has been promised to me over and over again by your office staff Lee Smith and the contractor worker, Dean, but to no avail. This work has not been completed as of today's date. I'm sure that having this work on the mini-ramp completed, at the side entrance, follows under the American with Disabilities Act. I need this ramp so that I can walk better and also be able to use my electric scooter over this threshold due to my rare neurologic disability. Please feel free to contact me on this matter if you have any questions. I look forward to see these repairs done as promised. Sirjcerely, Marguerite Marie Bane Phillips House 88 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Cc: Salem Disabilities Commission Mayor Stanley Usovicz Peter Strout, Building Commissioner ILCNSCA CITY OF SALEM- MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM J. LUNDREGAN Legal Department JOHN D. KEENAN City Solicitor 93 Washington Street Assistant City Solicitor 81 Washington Street SalemMassachusetts 01970 15 Church Street , . Tel:978-741-3888 Tel:978-744-8500 Fax:978-741.8110 Fax:978.744.0111 May 21, 1998 Craig Wheeler, City Planner One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Cluster Residential Development v. Planned Unit Development Dear Craig: Issue Presented: In response to discussions arising from a proposed development by the Salem Housing Authority(hereinafter"SHA"), you have asked for my opinion/review of the project in light of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, specifically whether appropriately addressed as a Cluster Residential Development (hereinafter"Cluster") or a or Planned Unit Development (hereinafter"PUD")? It is my understanding that the proposed project calls for approximately eight (8)units to be built off First Street on approximately ten (10) acres of land. The project is completely residential in scope. It will be part of a first time homebuyer's program offered by the SHA. The site is located in R-3 District. Short Answer: Regarding the project specifically proposed by the SHA, it should certainly be controlled by the Cluster provision as it is strictly residential in use and is no way intended as a mixed use. * * * * * * * * * * Purpose of Cluster& P.U.D. The Salem Zoning Ordinance as originally adopted in August, 1965 did not include either provisions for the Cluster or PUD. Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 9 allows for uses, which may only be permitted in specified districts upon issuance of a special permit. Cluster and PUD developments are specifically listed in Section 9. Both the provisions for the Cluster and PUD were amended to the Zoning Ordinance on May Page Two of Five May 21, 1998 Craig Wheeler RE: Cluster v. PUD 5, 1977. I have checked with the City Clerk and reviewed the minutes of the Council meeting at the time of the adoption. Outside the actual language to be adopted, the minutes provide no guidance or discussion as to specific purpose of one compared to the other. For specific purpose, we must look to the local provisions and the state statute. Sec. 7-14. Cluster Residential Development (emphasis added) Purposes. For the purposes of promoting the more efficient use of land in harmony with its natural features and with the general intent of the zoning ordinances and to protect and promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the inhabitants of the city, an owner or owners of a tract of land situated in R-C, R-1, R-2 and R-3 or a duly authorized agency thereof may, in connection with the submission of a subdivision plan for planning board approval under the Subdivision Control Law, if no such approval is required, after consultation with the planning board, make application to the planning board for a special permit excepting his plan from the lot area and frontage requirements of Article VI herein. Requirements ❑ No structure> 2 '/s stories. ❑ Follow natural features of site. ❑ Harmony with ordinance and master plan. ❑ Area 5 acres or more. ❑ Total area(open land & building lots) at least equal to land required by ordinance for total number of units. ❑ 10% of total tract set aside as common land and shall consist of usable open space ❑ Cluster not net negative environmental impact. ❑ Usable space owned by City of Salem for park, open space or conservation. By a corporation or trst with provisions for recreational use. ❑ Planning board may impose additional restrictions/conditions. ❑ Need 2/3 vote for approval. Sec. 7-15. PUD Planning board may grant special permit for PUD in any parcel of land in R-3, B-1, B-2, B-4, B-5 and I provided parcel contains a minimum of the lesser of 60,000 square feet or 5 times minimum lot size of district it is in. Purpose to provide various types of land use which can be combined in compatible relationship with each other as part of a totally planned development, (emphasis added). Page Three of Five May 21, 1998 Craig Wheeler RE: Cluster v. PUD Intent to ensure compliance with master plan and good zoning practices while allowing certain desirable departures from the strict provisions of specific zone classifications. All uses or any combination thereof permitted in R-3, B-1, B-2, B-4, B-5 and I maybe allowed in PUD subject to the following limitations: ❑ Multiplicity of residential uses so long as compatible at boundary. ❑ Specific commercial or industrial use for property adjacent to existing commercial or residential development may be approved so long as show how will protect abutting property and health, safety, welfare and privacy enjoyed thereon. ❑ Height limits in accordance zoning district. ❑ Frontage—at least that of adjacent or across street lots but no more than minimum for that zone. ❑ Lot size— may be below standards of zone so long as demonstrate reasonable relationship between proposed lot size and usable and accessible open area in total development. Individual lot shall be large enough to provide for private open space associated with the living accommodations. ❑ Harmony with zoning ordinance and master plan. ❑ Mixture of uses in PUD sufficiently advantageous to render it appropriate to depart from normal requirements of the district. (emphasis added). ❑ PUD not net negative environmental impact. ❑ Usable space owned by City of Salem for park, open space or conservation. By a corporation or trust with provisions for recreational use. ❑ Planning board may impose additional restrictions/conditions. ❑ Need 2/3 vote for approval. The state Zoning Act (Chapter 40A) provides in pertinent part: "Cluster development" means a residential development in which the buildings and accessory uses are clustered together into one or more groups separated from adjacent property and other groups within the development by intervening open land. . . "Planned Unit Development" means a mixed use development on a plot of land containing a minimum. . . , in which a mixture of residential, open space, commercial, industrial or other uses and a variety of buildingtype s . . . Mass. Gen. L. Ch. 40A, § 9. "Any statute should be interpreted so as to render it a consistent and harmonious whole, so far as reasonably practicable. Provisions of a by-law are not to'be reviewed in isolation but rather contextually. We should respect the plain meaning of words in accordance with common usage." Livoli v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Southborough, 42 Y � Page Four of Five May 21, 1998 Craig Wheeler RE: Cluster v. PUD Mass. App. Ct. 921, 922 (1997)(citations omitted)(discussing interpretation of accessory building). It does appear from the plain meaning of the local Salem provisions and the state statute that Cluster is intended for the residential use while PUD is intended for mixed uses. We must not took at Salem Cluster and PUD provisions individually but rather take them together along with the remainder of the ordinance as a harmonious whole. Considering that both the Cluster and PUD amendments were adopted at the same time, suggesting that a strictly residential use should be considered under the PUD would render the Cluster provision largely superfluous and effectively nullify the purposes for which it was enacted. Indeed, by merely naming a strictly residential project a PUD, one could circumvent the more restrictive cluster requirements. To make these consecutive provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance work harmoniously a Cluster should,not merely be considered a stricter subset of a PUD. There is scant caselaw in Massachusetts interpreting the definitions of these provisions. Cluster—See generally,New Seabury Corp. v Bd. of Appeals of Mashpee, 28 Mass. App. Ct 946, 948 (1990)(Cluster restrictions run with the land. Cluster with commercial use specifically provided for in local by-law); DiPaolo v. Bradstreet Land Development CC., 23 Mass. App. Ct. 928 (1986)(Danvers case discussing"open land" requirement of cluster); Owens v. Bd. of Appeals of Belmont, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 994 (1981)(aflirming special permit for multifamily residential/condominium cluster). PUD—See generally, LaBranche v. A.J. Lane, 404 Mass. 725 (1989)(hotel, motel and conference center PUD); Mullin v. Planning Bd. of Brewster, 17 Mass. App. Ct. 139, 144 (1983)(PUD need not contain all uses mentioned in statutory definition); Caruso v. Patson, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 28 (1973)(apartment buildings). See also, Massachusetts Zoning Manual (MCLE, Vol I), Chapter 8, Special Permits, §§ 8.12 and 8.14, pp.8-11 through 8-16 (1995)(the only limitation imposed by the act on the types if uses which may be allowed in a PUD is that they must be"mixed" which implies at least two distinct types of use). Interestingly, Mullin, which dealt specifically with the legality a board's vote, in dictum stated, "there is no necessity for a PUD to include all uses listed in G.L. c. 40A, § 9. The plain language of the section authorizes a development with any combination and any number of these possible uses." Mullin, 17 Mass. App. Ct. at 144. Although possibly suggesting that "open space" could be considered a use, such an interpretation would still not account for"variety of building types." Page Five of Five May 21, 1998 Craig Wheeler RE: Cluster v. PUD Conclusion: Thus, it is my opinion that the SHA project should be considered under the Cluster Residential Development requirements. Additionally, I would suggest that such discernment should be consistently applied by the Planning Board going forward. I hope the foregoing has been helpful. If you have any further questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly our lk", s, J D. KEENAN, ESQ. J 'm cc. William J. Lundregan, City Solicitor Leo Tremblay. Building Inspector THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC RE: Salem Housing for the_El.de.r_ly-66.7-7B) jBridge and Ash( C-) TAC-No—. 85013' G Field Meeting No. 1 3 June 1988 - M CO PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects Collaborat'-e7' InG. Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Constryctioh Co. Frank DeIulis DeIulis Brothers Construct,Pion Lo: A. F. Ring EOCD Construction Advisor 6 Elayne Hart Salem Housing Authority Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority I . Old Business: 1 . This is first Field Meeting. No old business. II. New Business: 1 . Substitution on Waterproofing - Jim Puri indicated he had reviewed the comparison data on changing the waterproofing material submitted by Associated Concrete Coating, Inc. Al Ring gave verbal approval on substitution. 2. Water Line - A question on the new water line cost was asked by Elayne Hart, who stated she hoped City would pay for moving water line on property at Bridge Street site. Jim Puri also stated what work was included in contract on water line. See enclosed letter by Joe Carroll . 3. Sprinkler Work - Question asked regarding total increase in cost because of Fire Department requirement that basement be sprinklered. Tony Pacitti had asked subcontractor for cost, but had not yet received it. 4. Broken Conduit - Tony Pacitti stated that during the foundation excavation, an electric conduit was unintentionally dug up. It was thought that this conduit fed the two light poles in the apartment parking lot in front of the site. Tony had his electrician fix the electric conduit. 4 6 B R A T T L E S T R E E T. C A M 8 R I D G E , M A S S A C H U S E T T S 0 2 1 3 8 U. S. A. TELEPHONE16171 8684200 TELE % : 200165 T A C C A M UR CABLE : T A C C A M U. 5. A. THElow ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 1 3 June 1988 Salem Housing for the Elderly 5. Elevator — Frank DeIulis informed Salem Housing Authority that Atlas Elevator Co. has failed to provide bonds as required. Also, requested that the next lowest bidder, Beckwick Elevator Co. , be awarded the subcontract. 6. Shop Drawings — Jim Puri asked Al Ring if he wanted a copy of all approved shop drawings. Al stated that he only wanted copies of shop drawings if a change order or if substitutions had been approved. Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 10 June 1988 at 8:30 a.m. at the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by James Puri , Project Administrator James Puri cc: All present EOCD Boston office Joe Carroll , TAC y...a:....'��.... .. _.. T H E ARCHITECTS C O LLA 13 O R AT I V E RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-76 Bridge and Ash - TAC No. 85013 O, Field Meeting No. 2 10 June 1988 = « Co PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects Collaborative`"Ind - ` I Reggie Peters The Architects Collaborating In C_ Frank DeIulis DeIulis Brothers Construct Ton CO A. F. Ring EOCD Construction Advisor Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority I. Old Business: 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present. 2. Sprinkler Work - Question asked regarding total increase in cost because of Fire Department requirement that basement be sprinklered. Tony Pacitti had asked subcontractor for cost, but had not yet received it. II. New Business: 1 . Legal Questions - Al Ring stated that if there were any questions pertaining to legal matters, then we could call Ms. Candy Tempesta of EOCD Legal Department at 727-7078. 2. Camera - Question asked regarding when camera would be provided to Clerk of Works by TAC. Jim Puri stated that various models were being evaluated, and one would be purchased and brought to Reggie as soon as possible. Al Ring asked if Salem Housing Authority had a camera that could be used in the meantime. Steve 2isson stated that S.H.A. did indeed hava a camera that might be used if needed. 3. Water Tie-in - Frank DeIulis stated that the water tie-in from Ash Street to the 20" main in Bridge Street did not go as smoothly as hoped for. The Salem Water Dept. broke a section of sewer line that needed repair. Once repaired, the Sewer Dept. did not like the repair and it had to be redone. Also encountered were the main telephone trunk lines which were unmarked in the street, a 16" gas line, as well as a smaller gas line that supplied Ash Street. Work is continuing with the water line and sewer tie-ins. 4 6 R R A T T L E S T R E E T C A M 6 R 1 0 6 E M A S S A C 19 0 S _ T T 2 0 1 3 9 . I). S. A_ TELEPHONE 16171 669 - 4200 TELE % 9 '. . 4914 1ACCAM C A h L F I A C C A M V. S . A. THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 2 10 June 1988 Page 2 III. Field Observation: 1 . Sewer repair is continuing from Ash Street into Bridge Street. 2. Form work for concrete footings is continuing. 3. Steel rebars are being placed in west wall footings. 4. Existing 6" water line capped between sidewalk along Bridge Street and Morency Manor parking lot. Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 17 June 1988 at 8:30 a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by James Puri , Project Administrator (0'' James Puri cc: All present EOCD Boston office Joe Carroll , TAC M1 THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-713 Bridge and Ash �. TAC No. 85013 ;{ Field Meeting No. 3 17 June 1988 " =' CCD PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects Collaborative Ind[ v Reggie Peters The Architects Collaborati43Inc; Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Constructfion Co w Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority I . Old Business: 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present. 2. Sprinkler Work — Question asked regarding total increase in cost because of Fire Department requirement that basement be sprinklered. Tony Pacitti had asked subcontractor for cost, but had not yet received it. 3. Water Tie—in — Water tie in has been completed. The only remaining item is the patching of Ash Street, which will be completed as soon as possible. II. New Business: 1 . Contractors' Questions — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri to provide information on: A. Stairway No. 2 on Drawing S-3. 1 . How is stair attached at landing. 2. How is 12" channel attached to floor framing; is unit bolted directly. B. Typical floor framing plan — are 3 — 2" x 10" at same level as rest of floor joists. C. Detail needed at foundation wall , east entrance. Jim Puri stated Joe Carroll had detail . D. Vertical coursing of brick needed. 2. Gas Tie In — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri if there was any more information regarding Gas Co. back charge. 3. Parking Spaces — Steve Zisson asked Tony Pacitti how long parking spaces located close to southwest corner of SHA 4 6 B H A T T L E S T H E E T _ C A M 8 H 1 U 6 H _ 1.1 A S S A C 1+ !' S E T T 0 2 1 3 8 . V S. A. T E L E P H O N E , 6 1 7 1 8 6 8 4 1 0 0 ', E L E % 4 8 4 1 A , ] n M C A 9 1 k T A C C A M U S A Ari T H E ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 3 17 June 1988 Page 2 property would be blocked off? Tony Pacitti told Steve Zisson that it would be approximately two more weeks until work would have progressed to allow parking.- Tony will check in with telephone company any time any work is scheduled on their property. 4. Sole Plate Tie Down - Reggie Peters asked if it would be possible to use a ramset and shoot sole plate of walls into floor of basement instead of bolting sole plate into floor. Jim Puri to check with EOCD and structural engineer. 5. Parking Lot Patch - Reggie Peters asked about patching of parking lot of Morency Manor, where hole appeared when water line broke during excavation. Tony Pacitti informed Reggie that a patch would be provided when Ash Street is repaired. 6. Draft Application - Tony Pacitti suggested that last Friday of month be used to review pencil draft of Application for Payment. III. Field Observation: 1 . Wall footing continuing. Concrete placed along south wall and partially along east and west walls. 2. Steel rebars being placed in north wall footings. Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 24 June 1988 at 8:45 a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by James Puri , Project Administrator James Puri cc: All present EOCD Boston office Dick Sabin, TAC Joe Carroll , TAC a THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC n rr n- RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-76 < Bridge and Ash 1�3 TAC No. 85013 r Field Meeting No. 4 24 June 1988 PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects Collaborative; Inc, Reggie Peters The Architects Collabor4tive Inch Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority Al Ring EOCD Construction Advisor I . Old Business: 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present with the following exception: A. Item 5 New Business - Tony Pacitti wanted to include, area of patch is located where old propane tanks had been removed and parking lot patched. This area had started to settle before water line break. 2. Sprinkler Work - Question asked regarding total increase in cost because of Fire Department requirement that basement be sprinklered. Tony Pacitti had asked subcontractor for cost, but had not yet received it. M.L. Dee & Associates to provide performance specification for pricing by plumbing contractor. 3. Water Tie In - Piping has been completed, and Ash Street has been patched. 4. Contractors' Questions - Mistry Associates to provide information on: A. Stairway No. 2 on Drawing S-3. 1 . How is stair attached at landing. 2. How is 12" channel attached to floor framing; is unit bolted directly. B. Typical floor framing, all members are at same elevation. This has been resolved. C. Detail at foundation wall , east entrance given to Tony, question remaining on concrete height at planters. D. Vertical coursing of brick TAC to provide. 4 6 B R A T T L E S T R E E T, C A M B R 1 0 G E . M A S S A C H U S E T T S 0 2 1 3 8 U. S. A. T E L E P H O N E I6 1 71 8 6 8-4 2 0 0 T E L E X : 2 0 0 1 6 5 T A C C A M U R C A B L E : T A C C A M U. S. A. THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. Field Meeting No. 4 24 June 1988 Page 2 5. Gas Tie In — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri .if there was any more information regarding Gas Co. back-charge. TAC to follow with information. 6. Parking Spaces — Steve Zisson asked Tony Pacitti how long Telephone Company parking spaces would be blocked. Tony stated that parking spaces would be blocked for one additional week. He would also inform Telephone Company in advance if anyone must go onto their property. 7. Sole Plate Tie Down — Information given to Reggie Peters regarding ramset vs. bolting of sole plate. 8. Parking Lot Patch — Holes in Morency Manor parking lot have been patched. II. New Business: 1 . Dyna Bolts — Tony Pacitti asked if 1/2"-5/8" Dyna Bolts could be used instead of bolting of sole plates. Jim Puri to check with Mistry Associates. 2. Coordination of Trades — Al Ring asked Tony Pacitti if any coordination meetings have been conducted between trades. Tony stated that meetings have not yet been held but will be when framing shop drawings have been returned. 3. Duct Sizing — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri to check duct chase size located in middle of corridor next to A unit as shown on drawing H-2. Jim will have information by next meeting. 4. Testing Company — Al Ring asked Jim Puri if a testing company had been selected, and, if so, a copy of the acceptance letter is to be sent to EOCD. Jim stated that Haller Testing Laboratories had been selected for the project and would check on letter. III. Field Observation: 1 . Concrete placed in remaining footing along north wall . 2. Foundation wall forms started this past week. First pour to take place today along south foundation wall . THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE iNc. Field Meeting No. 4 24 June 1988 Page 3 Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 1 July 1988 at 8:45 a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by James Puri , Project Administrator James Puri cc: All present EOCD Boston office Dick Sabin, TAC Joe Carroll , TAC THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-76 Bridge and Ash TAC No. 85013 c — Field Meeting No. 5 r 1 July 1988ZL rr w rn PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects Collaborative Inc;; Reggie Peters The Architects Collaborative Int? Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. Steve 2isson Salem Housing Authority Elayne Hart Salem Housing Authority Al Ring EOCD Construction Advisor I. Old Business: 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present. 2. Sprinkler Work — Question asked regarding total increase in cost because of Fire Department requirement that basement be sprinklered. Tony Pacitti had asked subcontractor for cost, but had not yet received it. M.L. Dee & Associates to provide performance specification for pricing by plumbing contractor. Al Ring also informed Tony that any additional cost for the sprinkler work would be handled by a change order. 3. Contractors' Questions A. Stairway No. 2 on Drawing S-3, Mistry Associates to provide information on: 1 . How is stair attached at landing. 2. How is 12" channel attached .to floor framing; is unit bolted directly. B. Details on concrete height at planters (main entrance) given to Reggie Peters. This has been resolved. C. Vertical coursing of brick. TAC to provide. D. Dyna Bolts — 1/2" Dyna Bolts could be used instead of bolting of sole plates for walls in basement. This has been resolved. E. Duct Sizing — Duct chase sizing could be increased in the corridors next to the A units without any problem. Overall length and width of duct could also be changed providing volume did not change. This has been resolved. 4 6 H R A T T L E S T R E E T C A M H R I D G E . M A S ti A C h l' S % T T S 0 : 1 3 9 U. S. A. T E L E P H 0 N E '. t 1 71 8 6 .9 4 2 0 0 T E L L % a 2 i 4 9 4 A c C A M C A 6 1. 'r 1 A C C A M V S. A THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 5 1 July 1988 Page 2 4. Gas Tie In — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri if there was any more information regarding Gas Co. back charge. TAC to follow with information. 5. Parking Spaces — Steve Zisson asked Tony Pacitti how long Telephone Company parking spaces would be blocked. Area along south foundation wall has been backfilled and parking spaces are no longer blocked. This has been resolved. 6. Testing Company — Al Ring asked Jim Puri if a testing company had been selected, and, if so, a copy of the acceptance letter is to be sent to EOCD. Jim stated that Haller Testing Laboratories had been selected for the project, and Joe Carroll had written acceptance letter. This has been resolved. II. New Business: 1 . Handicapped Units — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri if in the BF (handicapped) units a wall oven is needed. Jim will have information to Tony by next meeting. 2. Entry Doors — Tony Pacitti asked if the 1-3/8" pine doors meet the code requirements. Tony stated that if metal units were used, it would cost approximately $96.00 more for each unit. Jim Puri to check. 3. Cavity Wall Insulation — Tony Pacitti stated that warm and dry insulation could not be purchased separately. The company would only sell a system and not just sell warm and dry insulation. Could he go back to using ridgit insulation of the same "R" value. TAC to provide information. 4. Back Door in Manor — Elayne Hart informed Reggie Peters that the back door of the staricase next to Reggie' s office had been found open. Reggie is to make sure all doors are checked before he leaves at night. It was agreed that Reggie would call 24—hour SHA number to inform them that he had checked all doors and that he was leaving at this time. THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 5 1 July 1988 Page 3 III. Field Observation: 1 . Foundation wall poured last week had been stripped, waterproofed and backfilled. 2. Final preparation underway to pour approximately 85 feet of additional foundation wall , finishing south wall and continuing along east wall . Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 8 July 1988 at 8:45a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by James Puri , Project Administrator James Puri cc: All present EOCD Boston office Dick Sabin, TAC Joe Carroll , TAC Elayne Hart, SHA THE ARCHITECTS C O L L A B O RAT I V E 7i c �{ 47 rr r RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-7B P.J Bridge and ash h cO TAC No. 85013 w Field Meeting No. 6 =_� 8 July 1988 rn �o PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects Collaborative Inc. Reggie Peters The Architects Collaborative Inc. Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority I. Old Business: 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present. 2. Contractors' Questions: A. Stairway No. 2 on Drawing S-3, Mistry Associates to provide information on: 1 . How is stair attached at landing. 2. How is 12" channel attached to floor framing; is unit bolted directly. B. Vertical coursing of brick. TAC to provide. C. Handicapped Units - Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri if in the BF (handicapped) units a wall oven is needed. Jim informed Tony that it was the intent to use microwave ovens in handicapped units. D. Entry Doors - Tony Pacitti asked if the 1-3/8" pine doors meet the code requirements. Tony stated that if metal units were used, it would cost approximately $96.00 more for each unit. TAC to provide information. E. Cavity Wall Insulation - Tony Pacitti stated that warm and dry insulation could not be purchased separately. The company would only sell a system and not just sell warm and dry insulation. Could he go back to using ridgit insulation of the same "R" value. TAC to provide information. F. Gas Tie In - Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri if there was any more information regarding Gas Co. back charge. TAC to follow with information. 4 6 8 R A T T L E S 1 R E S T . C A M 8 R I D 6 E M A S S A C H U S E T T S 0 2 1 3 9 U. S. A. TELEPHONE . 161 ]1 668 - 4200 7ELCv. 92 1494 T A C C A M CABLE 7ACCAM U. S. A_ THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 6 8 July 1988 Page 2 3. Back Door in Manor - Elayne Hart informed Reggie Peters that the back door of the staircase next to-Reggie's office had been found open. Reggie is to make sure all doors are checked before he leaves at night. It was agreed that Reggie would call 24-hour SHA number to inform them that he had checked all doors and that he was leaving at this time. This has been resolved. II. New Business 1 . Water Line - Reggie Peters asked if water line could be brought in under foundation footing. Tony Pacitti stated water line would be done in this manor. This issue is resolved. 2. Elevator and Stairway Walls - Tony Pacitti asked if the typical wall specified for elevator and stairway walls could use wood studs instead of CH steel studs. TAC to advise. 3. Bathrooms - Tony Pacitti suggested it would be possible to switch the lavatories and water closets in all units except the BF units. TAC to check and have answer by next meeting. 4. Basement Chase Walls - Tony Pacitti asked if chase walls were needed in basement area. TAC to check and have answer by next meeting. III. Field Observation: 1 . Work continuing on framing foundation wall along remaining wall . The next. pour will finish all but approximately 20 feet of foundation. This will be left open to allow for interior basement work. 2. Severe heat has been a problem during the past week. Work has been stopped at midday because of the high temperature within the foundation work area. 4 THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 6 8 July 1988 Page 3 Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 15 July 1988 at 8:45 a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by James Puri , Project Administrator James Puri cc: All present EOCD Boston office Dick Sabin, TAC Joe Carroll , TAC Elayne Hart, SHA THE ARCHITECTS COLLABO R A T I V E RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-713 o - _t Bridge and Ash TAC No. 85013 T'1 Field Meeting No. 7 15 July 1988 PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects CollaboratNe IrLcd Reggie Peters The Architects Collaborative Inc. Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority Al Ring EOCD Construction Advisor I. Old Business: 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present. 2. Contractors' Questions: A. Stairway No. 2 on Drawing S-3, Mistry Associates to provide information on: 1 . How is stair attached at landing. 2. How is 12" channel attached to floor framing; is unit bolted directly. B. Vertical coursing of brick. TAC to provide. C. Handicapped Units — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri if in the BF (handicapped) units a wall oven is needed. Jim informed Tony that it was the intent to use microwave ovens in handicapped units. Ai Ring to check. D. Entry Doors — Tony Pacitti asked if the 1-3/8" pine doors meet the code requirements. Tony stated that if metal units were used, it would cost approximately $96.00 more for each unit. TAC to provide information. E. Cavity Wall Insulation — Tony Pacitti stated that warm and dry insulation could not be purchased separately. The company would only sell a system and not just sell warm and dry insulation. Could he go back to using ridgit insulation of the same "R" value. Four alternatives given to Tony by TAC. F. Gas Tie In — Tony Pacitti asked Jim Puri if there was any more information regarding Gas Co. back charge. Back charge to be sent to Steve Zisson when Tony receives bill . This item has been resolved. 4 6 B R A T T L E S T R E E T C A M B R I D G E M A b S A C H I: T T 5 0 2 1 3 8 U. S. A. TELEPHONE : 16171 66R - 4200 TELE % 72 1494 1ACCAM (_ ARIE ACCAM U. S- A THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 7 15 July 1988 Page 2 G. Elevator and Stairway Walls — Tony Pacitti asked if the typical wall specified for elevator and stairway walls could use wood studs instead of CH steel studs. Jim Puri stated that wood studs were approved for use in these bearing walls, and the shop drawings were being approved with this change. H. Bathrooms — Tony Pacitti suggested it would be possible to switch the lavatories and water closets in all units except the BF units. Jim Puri stated that all bathroom units had originally been designed with the lavatory and water closet switched. EOCD had requested that the bathrooms be switched. I. Basement Chase Walls — Tony Pacitti asked if chase walls were needed in basement area. Jim Puri stated that chase walls were not needed in the basement, providing all pipes are installed so that they would fall within wall area. II. New Business: 1 . Mechanical Room Vents — Tony Pacitti asked if location for vents for pulse type boilers were too close to walkway or windows above. Tony stated this question arose because of a problem encountered at a different building site. Tony will check with gas company. 2. Wall Sleeves — Steve Zisson asked if wall sleeves were to be provided in exterior wall in case air conditioners were to be added. Al Ring stated EOCD no longer recommends sleeves in exterior wall for air conditioning. Possibility of installing air conditioning units in double hung window units. 3. Sprinkler Work — Tony Pacitti stated that he had a verbal quote of $16,471 .00 for basement sprinkler coverage. Written quote to follow. III. Field Observation: 1 . All foundation walls have been poured except for approximately 20 feet at northwest corner. Contractor .4 THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE Field Meeting No. 7 15 July 1988 Page 3 working on finishing removal.-of wall forms from interior of foundation wall and cleaning of basement area. 2. Exterior of foundation wall will have Tuf and Dry insulation and waterproofing applied by the end of this date. Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 22 July 1988 at 8:45 a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by James Puri , Project Administrator James Puri cc: All present EOCD Boston office Dick Sabin, TAC Joe Carroll , TAC Elayne Hart, SHA T H E ARCHITECTS COLLABO R A T I V E 2 1� v �4 cy cas — i'l RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-713 205 Bridge Street TAC No. 85013 — Field Meeting No. 8 22 July 1988 PRESENT: Jim Puri The Architects Collaborative Inc. Joe Carroll The Architects Collaborative Inc. Reggie Peters The Architects Collaborative Inc. Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. Elayne Hart Salem Housing Authority Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority Al Ring EOCD Construction Advisor I. Old Business 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present. II. New Business 2. Air handling unit located in the attic has been sent to Mistry Associates for review of weight and support criteria. 3. It was agreed that in the basement area below the Community Room, rather than framing an opening with a header, one stud will be omitted to allow passage. 4. Tony Pacitti requested a sepia of Drawing X-2. 5. Tony was asked to provide a copy of the building permits so that they may be forwarded to the Assessors Department. 6. TAC was asked to review the size of the dryer vent. They are currently called for as 6", but clearance appears to be only 5-3/411. 7. TAC has verified that Warm N' Dri insulation will not be sold separately by Owens-Corning. Samples of the 703 thermal insulation are being forwarded as a proposed substitute to both TAC and Dick Piper at EOCD. 8. Due to the change of stairway walls to wood studs with 2 layers of 5/8" drywall on both sides from shaft walls, TAC will issue a sketch revising dimensions of unit Type C. 9. A discussion was held concerning cooking facilities in the handicapped units. Elayne Hart stated that micorowave ovens were not acceptable due to a potential problem for people with pacemakers. A phone call to Steve Demos at 4 6 B R A T T L E S T R E E T. C A M 8 R I D G E. M A S S A C II U S E T 7 S 0 2 1 3 8 U S A TEL E PH ON E X617) 868 4200 TE L EX 200 ! 65 T A C C A M U R CA R I. I" I ACC aM U S A s THE ARCHITECTS C 0 L L A 8 0 R A T I V E INC. Field Meeting No.B 22 July 1988 Page 2 EOCD was made. He -stated that the countertop unit located in the corner was not intended to be a microwave but rather a portable convection oven. TAC is to gather cuts of this unit and send them to DeIulis. 10. Elayne Hart was shown the samples of flooring, carpets, vinyl bases, etc. She will review them and respond next week. In reviewing the kitchen cabinet cuts, Elayne stated she did not want plastic laminate cabinets due to potential chipping problems. Tony Pacitti stated he will research wood cabinets. In the same phone call to Steve Demos mentioned above, he stated no objection to wood cabinets for a similar cost. III. Field Observations 11 . Grading and compaction of the area of the basement slab in progress. 12. Forming of the remainder of the foundation wall complete. Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 29 July 1988 at 8:45 a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by Joe Carroll , Project Manager Joe Carroll cc: 11 present ED Boston office Dick Sabin Joe Carroll Elayne Hart r THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE , f RE: Salem Housing for the Elderly 667-76 205 Bridge Street TAC No. 85013 Field Meeting No. 9 00 29 July 1988 ,.., o rte, rl� PRESENT: Roger Sheppard The Architects Collaborativi;:Inc. Joe Carroll The Architects Collabdativ'd n Reggie Peters The Architects Collaborative Inc. Tony Pacitti DeIulis Brothers Construction Co. Elayne Hart Salem Housing Authority Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority Al Ring EOCD Construction Advisor I. Old Business 1 . The minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all present. II. New Business 2. The color selections made by Elayne Hart are the following: A. Carpet - Ice Rose B. VCT - 51899 Coal White - Kitchens C. Sheet Vinyl - Seagate, 86500 White - Bathrooms D. Base - CB-55 - Silver Grey - Everywhere Note: Color of countertops still to be chosen. 3. Building permits were received from DeIulis. 4. The door submittal and precast drawings are needed. 5. The washer/dryer condition was reviewed. Steve Zisson and Elayne Hart agreed to reduce the number to one washer and one dryer. I asked if the money could be put toward the handicapped unit convection ovens. I also said the clearance problem for the dryer vent will be reviewed but noted that the Community Room area has a 9'-0" dropped ceiling which should allow for clearance. 6. Tony Pacitti asked to have the location of the unit heater in the basement in the area below the Community Room reviewed. 7. Air handling unit support still required from Mistry Associates. 4 G B R A T T L E S R E E T C A. M B R 1 0 G E M A S S A C PI U S E T T S 0 2 1 3 8 U S A T E L E PH 0 NE (61 71 8 6 8 4 2 0 0 T E L F X 2 0 0 16 5 T AC C A M U R CAB1 E T A CC A M U S A THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. Field Meeting No. 9 29 July 1988 Page 2 8. TAC has receive d- th'e 703 thermal cavity insulation from Owens—Corning and will review. 9. Tony Pacitti asked to revise some door locations in the basement. TAC saw no problem with the locations and asked for a marked—up print showing proposed locations. 10. Tony asked if the non—bearing partition in the unit bathroom chase walls could be revised to a 1-1/2 metal stud in order to increase clearance. TAC found no problem with this, but stated the wall may have to be cross tied to the 2 x 4 wall if it is not stiff enough. 11 . The sprinkler proposal shall be approved as a change order. 12. The electrical panel in Mechanical Room B03 was proposed to be moved from the east to west wall in order to move it away from a plumbing line. 13. Current specifications do not call for the electricians to wire for the phones, only to sleeve. TAC to get a price for doing both the site wiring for phones plus the inside wiring (separate numbers) from the phone company. DeIulis to get prices from the electrical subcontractor for the same items. 14. Tony Pacitti stated that the sewer line will connect on Bridge Street. 15. Elayne to provide the wording for the dedication plaque. 16. Tony was asked about any credit for the change of invert heights, etc. for area drainage. Drawing X-2 has been received by DeIulis. 17. The last Friday of the month will be for the "pencil requisition". They will be typed and signed at the next meeting. TAC will supply 30 pre—addressed and prestamped envelopes addressed to EOCD — Construction Division. 18. A question was asked on whether we wanted to install a site sign or receive a small credit. TAC to advise. THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. Field Meeting No. 9 29 July 1988 Page 3 III. Field Observations: 19. The remainder of the foundation wall has been poured and stripped. 20. Concrete floor slab for the basement was being poured. 21 . Haller testing on site to monitor and sample concrete pour. Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are any omissions or corrections, please contact this writer. Next meeting is 5 August 1988 at 8:45 a.m. in the Clerk of the Works office at the job site. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Prepared by Joseph Carroll , Project Manager /Vut4z� _ oseph Carroll cc: 1 present OCD Boston office Dick Sabin, TAC Elayne Hart, SHA Salem Housing for the Elderly; 667-7B 205 Bridge Street TAC Project No. 85013 Field Meeting No. 10 5 August 1988 Present: Roger Sheppard TAC CzG Reggie Peters TAC Tony Pacitti Delulius _ Steve Zisson SHA ti Al Ring EOCD , I. OLD BUSINESS 1 . Minutes of the previous meeting were read and accepted by all .present. 2. Color for counter tops still to be chosen. 3. Precast drawings not returned, still held by TAC for coordination with window openings which are not yet confirmed. 4. Location/ necessity for unit heater in low headroom area below Community room to be reviewed. 5. Air handling unit support still required from Mistry Assoc. 6. Tony Pacitti asked TAC to explore Owens-Corning 701 insulation for cavity in lieu of 703 for cost saving. 7. Change Order for sprinkler proposal required. 8. Elayne to provide wording for dedication plaque. 9. Tony to provide credit proposal re. drainage changes. ll. NEW BUSINESS 1 . Tony asked TAC to provide info. on suppliers of convection ovens for handicapped. 2. Tac reported Tony had provided marked up prints showing locations of revised Basement door locations and electrical panel layouts for room B-03. 3. Decision was made to require a site sign. 4. Reggie asked about a floor drain in the Basement to alleviate any flooding emergency. It was pointed out that there are cleanouts which in an emergency could take flow from portable sump pumps. G ' _ Field meeting 10 (ctd) 5. Tony questioned range hood indications - 30" hood at 21" range 24" hood at 30' cooktop. TAC to review. 6. Pricing of wood cabinets still in process. 7. Discussion of addn'I blocking required for window jamb anchorage and jamb extension. Tony to review in conjunction with possible savings if interior sash is pre-finished. III. FIELD OBSERVATIONS 1 . Basement floor slab has been completed and bearing wall stud framing is underway. Discussions of this meeting have been recorded as understood by this writer. If there are omissions or corrections please contact this writer. Unless notified to the contrary, these notes are assumed accurate. Next meeting 12 Aug. '88 in the Clerk of Works office at the job site. Prepared by Roger Sheppard, TAC Construction Administrator. -------------------- cc; All present EOCD Boston office Dick Sabin TAC Elayne Hart SHA JOB STATUS REPORT TAC Salem Elderly Housing Project Bridge Street Project No. 85013 Report Date 8/05/88 Project Mgr J. Carroll Excavation 75% Sash/Glazing site w, Foundation 85% Partitions Electric Frame 10% Doors/Frames Plumbing Exterior Walls Finishes Fire Protection Floors/Roof 20% Specialities HVAC Roofing Comments; Excavation for the building complete. Trenching for utilities and site grading remain to be done. Building foundations are complete. Accessory foundations remain to be done. The basement floor slab has been poured. Interior framing on the basement slab is in progress. Distribution Building Department R. Sabin TAC J. Carroll TAC R. Peters TAC File Signed �,y (� LVL Roger Sheppard THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE 4 6 B R A T T L E S T R E E T C A M B R I D G E , M A S S . JOB STATUS REPORT Salem Elderly Housing TAC Project Broad Street Project No. 85013 Report Date 8/05/88 Project Mgr J. Carroll Excavation Sash/Glazing Site Foundation 85% Partitions Electric Frame Doors/Frames Plumbing Exterior Walls Finishes Fire Protection Floors/Roof Specialities HVAC Roofing Comments; Structural engineer has reviewed demolition work to develop requirements for supplementary framing. Distribution Building Department R. Sabin TAC J. Carroll TAC R. Peters TAC File Signed Roger Sheppard THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE 4 6 B R A T T L E S T R E E T C A M B R I D G E , M A S S l:_t iFJ t nr;,T CITY OF SALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT deft 7 3 16 BOARD OF HEALTH CITY RECttyt_n Salem, Massachusetts 01970 O(- SALE1,1,W1uSS. ROBERT E. BLENKHORN 9 NORTH STREET HEALTH AGENT (617) 741-1800 April 6, 1988 Susan Keenan 27 Charter Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Madam: Correspondence with your name and address has been found among discarded debris at #1 Fort Avenue in Salem. This is an act of illegal dumping (MASS GENERAL LAWS CHAPTER 270, SECTION 16) , and you are hereby ordered to cease this practice immediately and remove all material you have dumped at once, pending legal action in Salem District Court. As this material was transported by motor vehicle, the registry of motor vehicles is being notified. Should you be aggrieved by this Order, you have the right to a hearing before the Board of Health. A request for said hearing must be received in writing in the office of the Board of Health within seven (7) days of receipt of this Order. At said hearing, you will be given an opportunity to be heard and to present witness and documentary evidence as to why this Order should be modified or withdrawn. You may be represented by an attorney. Please also be informed that you have the right to inspect and obtain copies of all relevant inspection or investigation reports, orders and other documentary information in the possession of this Board, and that any adverse party has the right to be present at the hearing. FOR THE BOARD OF HEALTH REPLY TO a ROBERT E. BLENKHORN, C.H.O. V. MOUSTAKIS, HEALTH AGENT SANITARIAN REB/m CERTIFIED MAIL P-783-675-574 cc : Fire Prevention / Building Inspector ✓ Councillor George Nowak Salem Housing Authority, 27 Charter St. , Salem, MA 01970 1•'0rm +,1 OuI ict• of. (:ctrnutlly I,ir:u.� lu Wul �llny - I" flnd+rr f sfi Cen .r.aw+s Ch. 119 Snr . 3n fffyyyrri G a V k/C I ri TO: nuildi: 3 Comlrii•ssionr,r or. Hoard of Health or Inspely..orof v . Idln+is nonr.d of Selectmen qS� 1� I'•o . 19 f File or Claim Ido . Clrum flats b(:nn 111w1(' involving lo.s'S , damage or destruction .r of the above-cai, . irnu.(i pr.oper. ty, vol, i clr ilia) e ther exceed $1 , 000 . 00 or r_au a P1a � - I en . l',aws� ( LaG+lel 143 , Section 6 to '. be applicable. if any 11 -icrtindEiL Ma ;e_,(,cn Laws , Ch. r39 , Sec. 3n is apprcpria1_F please direct t Lo the attention tte writes and include a reference to the captioned insured, location, policy number, date . of loss and claim or file number. h� �1 i' On this date , i. r_ausec9 copies of this notice to be sent to the persons nauued shove at, the addresses indicated + above by t lrsi_ (.lass n+a i.l . 1 Via~ - . +11141ttrr aric d- e ri t. &IM 30OUE41% autbaritp 27CI)arur�Ibtrect 4§a1em;9ua99a0tt5rtW 01970 GEORGE A. AUBERTIN,Chairman �eeptu°NCMy� YVONNE LYSIAK,Vice-Chairman Zetepbotte 744-4432 - HENRY J. LaPOINTE,Treasurer& State Board Representative STEPHEN ZISSON,Member RICHARD T. FEBONIO, Member \ WILLIAM J. FARRELL„Executive Director,Secretary AUGUST 24 , 1979. Mr. John Meszaro Senior Construction Engineering 100 Cambridge Street, RM 401 Boston, MA 02202 Dean Mr. Meszaro; In regards to our meeting of August 24 , 1979 at the Salem Housing Authority with you, Vincent Alpert, John Powers-Building Inspector, Bob LeBlanc-Maintenance Supervisor, Peter McSwiggin-Section 8 Admin- istrator, Henry LaPointe-State Board Representative, and myself concerning the problem of severe water leakage and the brick veneer seperating from the spandrel beams in several areas here at 27 Charter Street, please be advised of the following: It is apparent that this situation is far more serious than originally anticipated, and immediate steps have to be taken. We ar.e .hereby requesting the appropriation of funds to hire an architect to do a indepth feasability study. It is my understanding having reviewed this problem with Mr. Meszaro that funds may be available through DCA to. pay for the cost of architectural engineering survey , and cost of any structural work that may have to be done , to correct this situation as soon as possible. Your cab-operation in this matter is urgently needed, and deeply appreciatE Attached is .a letter from our City Engineer, Anthony Fletcher. An immediate response to this matter would be greatly appreciated. SINCERLY, WILLIAM J. FA RELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WJF/cam encl.s. cc: Mayor Jean A. Levesque Jack Powers Anthony Fletcher (Litg n£ ttlem, -414 ilepxrtutrut of Public Dorkq (©neulem (Stern ANTHONY V. FLETCHER. R P . RICHARD P. SWENSON, C.E. DIRECTOR of PUBLIC SERVICES Assistant Civil Engineer CITY ENGINEER ENGINEERING REPORT: AUGUST 22, 1979 CHARTER STREET HOUSING Investigate leaking brick walls, separation at caulked vertical joints, various floors. Mr. John Powers and I visited site with Mr. William Farrell , Executive Director. A visual examination was made of all four exterior faces of the building from ground elevation. It is quite apparent that there are many areas where the single wythe brick veneer has separated from the spandrel beam, creating a void for the entrance of water. Quite possibly, water is also penetrating through the brick and brick joints. Also apparent from ground level observation, is that many brick panels, on all exposures, are out of wind. "Bulges" are apparent at the relieving angles, and in some cases, particularly on the south exposure, midway between relieving angles. The building is constructed of reinforced concrete, flat slab type construction, wherein the bricks are not part of the structural integrity of the building and therefore, the brick condition poses no threat structurally. Condition of the brick does contribute to wall exposure leaking problems and should be repaired. Without further investigation with sophisticated equipment, public danger cannot be ascertained. . The Engineering and Building Departments do not have the necessary testing equipment to make further safety determination. To cause further, in depth investigation, the following action was taken: Called DCA and was refered to Mr. R. Pyne, Director of Development. Mr. Pyne was not available, and the operator refered our call to Mr. Richard Piper, also of the Development Division. After discussion, Mr. Piper relating to our concerns with the brickwork, Mr. Piper agreed that he would discuss the situation with the Archi- tectural Construction Division, leading to a team investigation by the Architectural Construction Division of DCA. _ 2 _ Mr. Piper is to contact Mr. Farrell later this date to set up site investigation August 23, 1979, with Mr. Powers, Mr. Farrell , and DCA team, headed by Mr. Bert Allschwhng, Architect, Construction Division, DCA. Anthony V. Fletcher, P.E. City Engineer Director of Public Services John Powers Building Inspector AVF/cc Copies: Mayor Levesque Mr. William J. Tinti Mr. William Farrell �cOED Ar.O Tity !lf 0alrm, massttlliusrl#s ,. 1§a1em Housing Aut4ori V QU 1140 q STEPHEN ZISSON. CHAIRMAN - e JOHN J. WALSN, VICE-CHAIRMAN A.( CHESTER J. KOH N.TREASURER-STATE BOARD REP. /J PETER M. MCSWIGGIN. MEMBER �FIJ,�q$S, GEORGE A. AUBERTIN, MEMBER v. JAMES A. DALTON. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SECRETARY September 2,1975 Mr. John B. Powers Building Inspecotr City of Salem Dept. of Public Property 5 Broad St. Salem, Mass. Dear Sir: Chairman Stephen Zisson was informed by Foreman Robert L. Le Blanc of the State Building Inspectors check up at Elderly Housing "Project at 27 Charter St. He would like your official opinion on the detailed requirements for the new (second) circuit breaker for the elevators, the stand by batteries for the electric service and if you think the aluminum wiring does require replacement. His examination of the code indicates this wiring is still approved under certain conditions. No funds are available at this time for this corrective work but are expected within a short time and it will be necessary to have this work advertised and bid on. Your reply will be appreciated. Very truly yours, SALEM HOUS NG AUTHORITY d� �'....,.,.-.� R.E. O'Connor Executive Director cc:John Condon,City Electrician City of Salem, Mass. State Inspector DDRB IA- Titiy of Oittlrm. Massar4usrits *ulrm Housing Authnritu o P.,11. 's a ✓ tr ' RFDRIM .B+' STEPHEN ZISSON. CHAIRMAN JOHN J. WALSH. VICE-CHAIRMAN CHESTER J. KOHN. TREASURER-STATE BOARD REP. PETER M. MCSWIGGIN. MEMBER GEORGE A. AUBERTIN. MEMBER JAMES A. DALTON. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SECRETARY August 29;1975 Edmond 10 mangini Deputy Administrator Department, of Community Affairs 100 Cambridge St• ' Bostoa, Mass4 402202 Dear Art The installed plastic smoke dome at Project 667-5 was destroyed by .stmrm an April 3,1915,iMr: Ken Ghrlstie 'is aware of this condition*. Nofault on 'the ppAart of the Contractor was determined as the installatlon was made according to plans `and $oweverthe hatch is temporarily sealed by plywood and with expected weather conditionsthe Authbiiiy. , And Ithe City and State Building inspectois are id anous to have this corrected as .soon as possible. Enclosed are copies of three bids;recelved at Neeting of the Authoriay on August 26,2. x« Nevi England Rooding 00#,p Inc.N `7540 No, Shore Class & `AlumB,Go6 Ynci 2,$00•,00 Salem Welded Products do.,: l 21652400 We would like to ask for' quick apProita!Ao award the work tc� the e lour, b$dder.Salem Welded,Products Coc In ►e suis of 12 632.,00 and to charge this suti `to .the..Development`. , ` Accounts he c<smpany has indicated at least one week ton days for assembly of the unit 'andranother four ar five da for installation. Ve ` trul. ours• .;` WE.OSConnor Executive DiredtorCc s ^ End1s. v� eco debt B. PoweraiBldg.ltspecto'r \ city of Salem State lnspeefor Tity of Apairm, Massar4nort#!i Bi9il©iNG DEPT _ � Salem �inusing Auilinritg / o 0141N DOS NOV 19 AM 974 STEPHEN ZISSON. CHAIRMAN RECE'l ED JOHN J. WALSH. VICE-CHAIRMAN F O CITY SALE}g,VIASS CHESTER J. KOHN,TREASURER-STATE BOARD REP. 1 V! H Lf LAURENT R. DENIS. MEMBER October 31, 1974 PETER M. McSWIGGIN, MEMBER JAMES A. DALTON. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SECRETARY Mr. John Powers Building Inspector City of Salem 5 Broad St. Salem, Mass. Dear Mr. Powers : Confirming our discussion of 10/29/74, the Salem Housing Authority has advised our architect to draw-up specifica- tions for the installation of a battery system as a source of stand-by ower for the fire alarm systema r commended by you andd. D.J.Goggin in his letter of 10 OK to you. (Recommendation 2a) . The installationwil be completed as sgon as possible con- forming to N.F.P.A. 72 B, paragraph 2265. Very truly yours, SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY By S; 1 „c_ C/o to : C .IRMA D .Habib,R.Charles Architects. C .Peoples , DCA. Farwell Construction Corp. L.Recine ,Supt. Farwell Constr.Corp. ROBERT CHARLES ASSOCIATES, INC. BUILDING REPT ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 35 SARATOGA STREET ]1' BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02128 Oct 19 1149 AM *7q TEL. (617) 569-4360 RECEIVED CITY Of SALEM,MASS. October 25 , 1974 Mr. John Powers Building Inspector City of Salem 5 Broad Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re : Project 667-5 Housing For The Elderly Salem, MA. Dear Mr. Powers : This is to verify that the structure for the above-referenced project has been erected in accordance with the approved plans. As erected, the building complies in all respects with the Basic Code and all other laws governing building construction. 4 Sincere you/� _i/ - David P. Habib , A. I. President a�6oA\Apel. )P. Foy Iq 3296 DPH/lml o WWTON MASS, W CC : Farwell Construction Co. Salem Housing Authority �FgtrH a�ngG Dept. of Community Affairs VI T �` . lilt of SAM, J1tw5ti Idjuneffn } -�`T71rtn �Iautl,@ttQ �uthnx4x�t STEPHEN ZISSON. CHAIRMAN JOHN J. WALSH. VICE-CHAIRMAN CHESTER J. KOHN. TREASURER.STATE BOARD REP. LAURENT R. DENIS. MEMBER October 24, 1971, PETER M. McSWIGGIN. MEMBER - JAMES A. DALTON. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND BECRCTARY Chief James . Brennan City of SalemFire Department 48 Lafiyel.te Street Salem, Mass. Dear Sir: Reference is made to letter of October 103 1974 from Lieutenant David J. Goggin, Salem. Fire Marshal, con- cerning the location of the Fire Department connection at the Housing for Elderly Project at Charter and Lib- erty Streets, Salem, Mass. Because an extreme hardship would result from any changes in the present installation we respectfully request a. deviation for this installation as it now stands. We would appreciate your early action and approval on this . Very truly yours, SPLETI ROUSING AUTHORITY By e C/o : J.Powers ,Bld .inspector. 70t . D.J.Ga,ggin fire Nars_:al ;.Charles Assoc. ,Architects Farwell Construction Corp. ` BUILDING DEPT of ttlPm, assurimsEtt5 �c OCTI[�t ttMnpite0quarttrs CITYOFF SACIVED October O 4 LEM,MASS, Res housing for Elderly Charter Street, Salem Project Vass 667-5 Mr. John Powers tl Salem Housing Authority Building Inspector City of Salem Five Broad Street Salem, Nass. 01970 Dear fix. , Powers3 As a result of inspections conducted at the Housing for Elderly, Charter Street, Salem; on October 3, October 49 and October 7, 1974 the follow- ing recommendations remain to be .satisfied before a Certificate of Occupancy can be initialed and permission to occupy can be agreed to by the Salem Fire Department. 1. As a result of the letter dated August 29, 1974 to your office , with copies to various interested parties , this office was given at the site two copies of P-plans and two copies of E-plans, which are not acceptable. The P-plans were dated January 8,- 1973 and the E-plans were also dated January 8, 1973. a. The P-plans were substantially the same as originally pre- sented to this office with a date of November 3, 1972; and which were NOT APPROVED in my letter to Robert Charles Asso- ciates, Inc. on February, 23, 1973. A copy of this letter was sent to your office on that date. Several discrepincies existed and I CAN NOT at this time approve these P-plans. You will note that Chapter 33 of the Salem City Ordinances require the approval of the Salem Fire Department on the . Fire protection. plans. This architect appears to be ignoring the Fire Department requirements , and said lack of co-operation shall be duly noted. b. The sprinkler and standpipe test were conducted, so as not create an extreme hardship on the elderly waiting patiently for the completion of their structure. It is therefor sug- sested that the following recommendations be implemented and two sets of AS BUILT drawings «be submitted for approval, in lieu of the failure of the architect to- submit the P-plans for approval, originally. 1. The six inch domestic line taken off the eight inch Fire supply, does not in my opinion lend itself to proper installation practices. Fire supply lines should not be a part of any domestic water supply. Because of this late date in construction, this office will permit same to exist, but with reservations. 2. The Fire Department Connection is placed in the rear of the structure and not accessable to fire department pumping apparatus. This again is a lack of approval Page #2-Res Housing for Elderly, Charter Street, Salem. Oct. 10, 1974 1. b. 2 continued: of the plans for installation. The owner shall apply for in writing, a request for deviation because of hard- ship, resulting from this installation being in position at this date, to the Office of the Salem Fire Chief James F. Brennan. This approval shall rest with the office of the Fire Chief. 3. A local sprinkler alarm unit shall be provided as required in NFPA Standard 13, Section 3-16. This may be met with a 6 inch or 8 inch weatherproof alarm bell. A test of same will be required by the Fire Department when installed. 4. A pressure gage with a connection not smaller than i inch, as required in NFPA Standard 13, Section 2-9. 2 shall be required. This gage and test pipe will provide inspectors to check the system at the highest point of each riser and will suffice for the test pipe as required ordinarily in multi-story buildings by NFPA Standard 13, section 3-8. 1. 2 This shall mean one gage at the top of each riser, with a test connection available. A test of same will be required by the Fire Department when installed. 5. The tests conducted on the sprinkler and standpipe system are recorded and placed on file. The 2nd floor flow switch found defective on the inspection of October 4th, was subsequently corrected and approved on the inspection of October 7, 1974. All other flow tests with their static and residual pressures recorded are accepted and approved, this date. 6. An additional plate shall be placed over the Fire Department connection to show the connection provides water inlets for both Sprinkler system and the Standpipe system. 7. All O. S.& Y valves shall be properly tagged with metal tags designating their use. c. An inspection and test of the interior fire alarm system was conducted on October 7, 1974. -E-plans as recently presented to this office are not approved, because they do not show the corrections and recommendations as requested in the letter dated February 23, 1973. These items are: Plan E 2- Detector for laundry room; Plan E 3- Two detectors for Community room; and failure- to provide sketch of Annun- ciator with designations shown. It is noted that the fixed temperature detectors as recommended for kitchen areas are located approximately three feet from the stoves. The distance recommended by this office is eight feet, so as to eliminate the potential heat increase from the stove and oven. Upon testing, in two locations, using the oven and all burners with a pan of boiling water or, one burner; that the detectors as located appear to be satisfactory. This . Page #3-Res Housing for Elderly, Charter Street, Salem. October 10, 1974 l. c continued: ` shall not be construed to be an approval in total of the fixed temperature detectors in these locations, but will be considered approved subject to actual testing under live-in conditions, All interior fire alarm stations with the fire horns and lamps were tested and are approved, with the notification that the lamp on the eighth floor near room 801 was not operating. This shall be re- tested prior to occupancy. 2. Other recommendations : .Ia. A wet battery source for standby power, is recommended for all interior fire alarm systems. This was not shown on any plans and of course we have never approved any plans , anyhow. b. Smoke door leading from the elevator area to corridor near room 1106 is sagging. This may be an uneven floor. The door will not close when pushed open. c. It appears that we may have an excessive heat buildup in the Generator room. This should be checked and corrected. d. Pull wires located on the smoke vents for use during con- struction shall be removed. No test has been conducted on these vents. These are in the stairwells at the 12th floor. e. Fire hose nozzle on standpipe near room 201, appears to have improper threads. It will not stay firmly on the hose. f. Fire extinguishers as recommended in letter have not been .placed in position as of this date. g. Keys to be provided the Fire Department as outlined in the letter of August 29, 1974 shall be turned over when con- struction locks are changed to owners locks. h. The right hand elevator would not operate after the test conducted with the emergency generator. Firemans test O. K. 3. At least 24 hours prior notification shall be required for re-inspection. All inspections are conducted by appointment and will be conducted upon avail-ability of an inspector, R e e�c)t lly s}�b itt d, GLI�U�I � j44A David J ogg' Salem Fire Marshal cc: Salem Housing Authority Mayor Jean A. Levesque Robert Chaarles Associates, Inc. Mr. McKinnon, Clerk of Ylorks United Electrical Contractors Gaffny Plumbing & Heating Salem Electrical Dept. file it fit of alert 19assadpAutfs 3flirr %partuteni 'EesDquarirrs Tames e(_ prznu� October 10, 1974 Ch1ef Re: Housing for Elderly Charter Street, Salem Project Mass 667-5 Mr. John Powers Salem Housing Authority Building Inspector City of Salem Five Broad Street Salem, Mass. 01970 Dear Mr. Powers: As a result of inspections conducted at the Housing for Elderly, Charter Street, Salem= on October 3, October 4, and October 7, 1974 the follow- ing recommendations remain to be satisfied before a Certificate of Occupancy can be initialed and permission to occupy can be agreed to by the Salem Hire Department. 1. As a result of the letter dated August 29, 1974 to your office, with copies to various interested parties , this office was given at the site two copies of P-plans and two copies of E-plans, which are not acceptable. The P-plans were dated January 8, 1973 and the E-plans were also dated January 8, 1973. a. The P-plans were substantially the same as originally pre- sented to this office with a date of ;november 3,--!9-72 L and which were NOT APPROVED in my letter to Robert Charles Asso- ciates, Inc. on February, 23 _1973=•= A copy of this .letter was sent to your oi�fice on that date. Several di.screpincies existed and i CAN NOT at this time approve these P-plans. You will note that Chapter 33 of the Salem City Ordinances require the approval of the Salem Fire Department on the Fire protection. plans. This architect appears to be ignoring the Fire Department requirements , and said lack of co-operation shall be duly noted. b. The sprinkler and standpipe test were conducted, so as not create an extreme hardship on the elderly waiting patiently for the completion of their structure. It is therefor sug- sested that the .following recommendations be implemented and two sets of AS -BUILT drawings be submitted for approval , in lieu of the failure of the architect to submit the P-plans for approval, originally. 1. The six inch domestic line taken off the eight inch Fire supply, does not in my opinion lend itself to proper installation practices. Fire supply lines should not be a part of any domestic water supply. Because of this late date in construction., this office will permit same to exist, but with reservations. 2. The Fire Department Connection is placed in the rear of the structure and not accessable to fire department pumping apparatus. This again is a lack of approval Page #2-Re: Housing for Elderly, Charter Street, Salem. Oct. 10, 1974 1. b. 2 continued: of the plans for installation. The owner shall apply for in writing, a request for deviation because of hard- ship, resulting from this installation being in position at this date , to the Office of the Salem Fire Chief James F. Brennan. This approval shall rest with the office of the Fire Chief. 3. A local sprinkler alarm unit shall be provided as required in NFPA Standard 13, Section 3-16. This may be met with a 6 inch or 8 inch weatherproof alarm bell. A test of same will be required by the Fire Department when installed. 4. A pressure gage with a connection not smaller than } inch, as required in NFPA Standard 13, Section 2-9. 2 shall be required. This gage and test pipe will provide inspectors to check the system at the highest point of . each riser and will suffice for the test pipe as required ordinarily in multi-story buildings by MFPA Standard 13, section 3-8. 1. 2 This shall mean one gage at the top of each riser, with a test connection available. A test of same will be required by the Fire Department when installed. a- 5. The tests conducted on the sprinkler and standpipe system are recorded and placed on file. The 2nd floor flow switch found defective on the inspection of October 4th, was subsequently corrected and approved on the inspection of October 7, 1974. All other flow tests with their static and residual pressures recorded are accepted and approved, this date. 6. An additional plate shall be placed over the Fire Department connection to show the connection provides water inlets for both Sprinkler system and the Standpipe systema 7. All O. S.& Y valves shall be properly tagged with metal tags designating their. use. c. An inspection and test of the interior fire alarm system was conducted on October 7, 1974. E-plans as recently presented to this office are not approved, because they do not show the corrections and recommendations as requested in the letter dated February 23, 1973• These items are: Plan E 2- Detector for 'Laundry room; Plan E 3- Two detectors for Community room; and failure_ to provide sketch of Annun- ciator with designations shown. It is noted that the fixed temperature detectors as recommended for kitchen areas are located approximately three feet from the stoves. The distance recommended by this office is eight feet, so as to eliminate the potential heat increase from the stove and oven. Upon testing, in two locations, using the oven and all burners with a pan of boiling water on one burner; that the detectors as located appear to be satisfactory. This Page #3-Res Housing for Elderly, Charter Street, Salem. October 10, 1974 Le continued: shall not be construed to lie an approval in total of the fixed temperature detectors in these locations, but will be considered approved subject to actual testing under live-in conditions. All interior fire alarm stations with the fire horns and lamps were tested and are approved, with the notification that the lamp on the eighth floor near room 801 was not operating. This shall be re- tested prior to occupancy. 2. Other recommendations: . a. A wet battery source for standby power, is recommended for all interior fire alarm systems. This was not shown on any plans and of course we have never approved any plans , anyhow. b. Smoke door leading from the elevator area to corridor near room 1106 is sagging. This may be an uneven floor. The door will not close when pushed open. c. It appears that we may have an excessive heat buildup in the Generator room. This should be checked and corrected, d. Pull wires located on the smoke vents for use during con- struction shall be removed. No test has been conducted on these vents. These are in the stairwells at the 12th floor. e. Fire hose nozzle on standpipe near room 201, appears to have improper threads. It will not stay firmly on the hose. f. Fire extinguishers as recommended in letter have not been placed in position as of this date. g. Keys to be provided the Fire Department as outlined in the letter of August 29, 1974 shall be turned over when con- struction locks are changed to owners locks. h. The right hand elevator would not operate after the test conducted with the emergency generator. Firemans test O.K. 3. At least 24 hours prior notification shall be required for re-inspection. All inspections are conducted by appointment and will be conducted upon avail-ability of an inspector. Re ect ll y sVhal itt d, L Lieut. David oggSalem Fire iyiar cc: Salem Housing Authority Mayor Jean A. Levesque Robert Chaarles Associates , Inc. Mr. McKinnon, Clerk of Works United Electrical Contractors Gaffny Plumbing & Heating Salem Electrical Dept. file G - -114-: Casualty&Surety Division BUILDING DEPT 240 Pleasant St. Methuen, Mass. 01844 LIFE&CASUALTY 687-1121 SEP U 3 06 PM 974 RECEIVED September 16, 1974 CITY OF SALEM,MASS: City of Salem, Mass. Public Works Dept. Office of the Building Inspector 93 Washington St. Salem, MA FE: A6 PP 529824 SP Insured: Gaffney Plumbing & Heating Corp. Date of Loss: 7-10-74 Dear Sips: Our insured, Gaffney Plumbing & Heating Corp, of Middleton, Mass, was the plumbing sub-contractor for the building construction work at the Salem Housing for the elderly on Charter St. , in Salem, Mass. Allega- tion has been made by the general contractor, Farwell Construction Corp. of Newtonville, MA which indicates that our insured was responsible for blockages in the waste pipe installation into the Slaem Housing for the elderly which resulted in overflow of the system and subsequent damage to walls, floors, .and doors within the building. Discussion with our insured revealed that our insured work was examined by Salem Inspector, Mr. George 0' Connell as the job progressed and our insured has denied any faulty work during the course of their portion of this building construction. ZOur insured further indicates that any blockages which had occured in the waste pipes in the building were the I cause of the miscellaneous debris and tiel grouting and wet cement being poured down through the toilets or wast pipes which eventually set up and caused the blockage over a period of time. In this respect, in order to obtain all of the information pertenent in this matter, it is requested that we be provided a copy of any of the inspection results and/or transcripts or memos or any other documentation pertaining to the plumbing in the Salem Housing far the elderly which was completed by our insured. It should be noted that we are only attempting to uncover the facts and are interested in any and all information concern- ing the plumbing in this building. Should there be any question concern- ing our position it is requested that I be contacted in this reagrd and I would be happy yo meet with the plumbing inspector to discuss the matter. Your cooperation in this matter will be deeply appriciated. Yours very truly, Nichols Robert �d. Nichols Claim Represer-tative RJN•n0m L-487 A .Etna Li#e Insurance Company/The ktna Casualty and Surety Company/The Standard Fire Insurance Compan BUILDING DEPTBUILDING DEPT ffitg of *a1put, 'Alsoadj tse##s 3 0 00 AM '74 3Tir&EVrp1r1&fi0A 444artrrs :Pumps RE'EIVED CEI . Pre"m CITY POLEM,MASS: CITY QRSF SALT E:VEQMP MASS. August 29, 1974 Building Inspector City of Salem Five Broad Street Salem, Mass. 01970 Sirt As a result of a preliminary inspection held this date of the premises on Charter Street, known as Project Mass. 667-5, Housing for Elderly; the following recommendations are submitted which should receive serious condideration. These recommendations are made in the interest of fire prevention and to correct conditions that are or may become dangerous as a fire hazard, require com- pliance under fire prevention regulations or are in violation of law. 1. Plans for sprinkler installation have never been approved by this office. Violation of Salem Fire Code. Ref, letter of 2/23/73• 2. Plans for fire alarm installation have never been approved by this office. Violation of Salem Fire Code. Ref. letter of 2/23/73. 3. Item # 6 of letter dated Feb. 23, 1973 has never been submitted. i. e. Annunciator plan to be submitted for approval. 4. As of this date the Master Fire alarm box has not been installed. 5. As of this date the interior fire alarm system has not been tested by this office, per regulation #15. 6. As of this date the 1i" thread on the standpipe hose connections is National Standard Thread and must be changed to conform to the thread for the Salem Fire Dept. which is Iron Pipe Thread. This shall also mean changing the hose and nozzles in the cabinets to provide 11" I. P. Thread. 7. One Five pound Tri-Class ABC fire extinguisher shall be provided for each hose cabinet or adjacent to same. F. P. R. #9 Rule 2. 8. It shall be noted that two sprinkler heads are covered with a protection cover for painting and shall be removed immediately. 9. Keys for the lobby entrance, all other outside doors, the mech- anical rooms, sprinkler room, roof door, elevator machine room, and fire alarm panel shall be provided the fire department and marked as requested by the fire department. 10. The elevator operation shall be demonstrated to the fire departr ment training officer and the ladder companies, by the installer. This shall be done by appointment. Elevator Fireman's service keys shall be provided at this time, including one brass key for key box. 11. It has been noted that the pipe chase for the sprinkler system should be filled in to eliminate a vertical draft condition. 12. As this is a combined standpipe and sprinkler system, the plate on the fire department connection in the rear of the building should read sprinkler and standpipe connection. This now only reads standpipe connection. R ec fullivi b 'tted ccs MMa or ean.A. a s u P y s Sa�em ousinguio�i App eEcKChar]hesCJSpjcol "forks alem� Fire Marsha a In nno . (Iitn of J�ttlrm, Massttr4usrtts Aire Department FeaAgaariera S� Cp1Q1A games A. Prmnan February 23, 1973 Chad Robert Charles Assoniates Snc. "I Architects and Engineers Ret State Aided Housing *or x : 35 Saratoga Street the Elderly, Charter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02128 Salem, Massachusetts Sirst P Project Plans (Salem 667-5) dated January 8, 1973, submitted to this V'. office have been reviewed for consideration of approval, with regard to fire prevention and fire protection. As of this date the following approvals and/or recommendations arel,hereby made. A - Reference to Specifications 1. Section 14A - Your attention is called to MassachusettsElevator £ a' Regulation EL1f 2, which requires a fireman's service key shall be availa- 0 ble for the use of the fire department. A test of the elevator operation Iehall be conducted for the Fire Marshal and the Fire Department Training Officer. This test shall be by pre-arranged appointment. 2. Section 15A.43 Standpipe System - Two sets of plana showing the f, a Standpipe system shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for stamped approval. Standpipe system shall be a Class 3 system. Your s { � s attention is called to N.F.P.A. Standard #14, Section 412, which calla for the outlet for large hose to be in the stairway only. The small hose in , - • :; aPa�; a cabinet shall be located in the .corridor or apace adjacent to the stair- (+ , r way enclosure. Please remove standpipe hose cabinets from stairways as' shownomcurrent plans. Water flow indicator valves shall be required yon each level. This may be installed in conjunction with the combined sprinkler k ' and standpipe system arrangement. Fire department Siamese connection �+ Z and 8" fire supply a proper approved, Alternate #1 requiring' 8• pp y ppear ro rend are a automatic sprinklers in stairways and corridors,can&comgaotor roan' on c each floor properly connected to an adequate water supply shall be installed 4• "�- Q for the protection of the occupants of this type structure. Only one p set of sprinkler installation plans have been submitted to the Salem Fire + Prevention Bureau for stamped approval pproval by Halliwell Engineering Inc. These plane are not acceptable because of hose cabinets in wrong location." .1 Hose should be in a wall cabinet also. Sprinkler system shall be provided `x , .. with water flow indicator valves to establish zones on each floor. This sprinkler alarm by floor zone shall be shown on the annunciator provided ; In the main entrance area. YS A i S 1 t y I 3. Division 19 - Heating and Ventalating - Ventilation plans and specifi- cations shall comply with recommendations as stated in N.F.P.A. Standard #90A. i 4. Electrical. Item #30 Fire Alarm, t Item a. - approved p Item h. - approved t Item c. - approved Item d, - approved M1I, Item e. - approved Item f. - approved Item g. - approved y, Item h. - Name titles shall refer to actual title of area protected, i.e. 2nd floor. �^ P Item 1. - approved Item j. - approved Item k, - Fire alarm system shall be tested in the presence of the Salem Fire Marshal. Item 1. - approveda Reference tolans dated 1/0/73 p submitted: � 1. Two sets of plans showing complete fire alarm installation, shall be "a» • submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for stamped approval. E Plane sub- mitted by Halliwell Engineering Inc. need revamping. r 2. Plan E 2 - First Floor Plan - Recommend a heat detector be placed in the laundry room. All manual pull stations, horns, and detectors as shown are approved for location. 3- Plan E 3 - Community Room - Recommend at least two heat detectors'' s ke be placed in the community room. The manual''pull station and horn locations as shown are approved. You may wish to consider the addition of magnet 6' , hold open devices for the doors leading to the first floor main section. , No door stops are permitted, 4. Plan E 4 - Typical Floor Plan - The manual pull station, fire''horn,' and heat detector locations as shown in typical apartments are approved. 5. Plan E 5 - Wiring Diagrams - All portions of the plan referring to the Fire Alarm System are approved. 6. Sketch of proposed annunciator is requested. • rt '' Ree ectful submitted 6Z4 p` Lieut, David J. Cos+ ° 91. Salem Fire Marshal TS�� t oa`�Yi ' DJC:rq cc - File *k Halliwell Engineering Associates 4 I Building Inspector, Daniel O'Brien ' 1 Salem Housing Authority ' 4W Xx. Robert Venne * r; r STEP EllTISEREHITECT . 1330 SEAC0N STREET.BROOKLINE,MASSACHUSETTS 02146•PHONE:617-731-TnO 9 January 1981 Salem Housing Authority - 27 Charter Street Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Mr. William Farrell Re: New Housing for the Elderly - Salem 667-6 Dear Bill : We have run into a minor snag in the development of _the construction documents for the captioned project, and need direction from you. In a routine review of the preliminary electrical system design, the Salem Electrical Inspector informed our electrical engineering consultant that an emergency generator would be required... Mr. Condon' s requirement, evidently based on an arbitrary selection of one of the options presented by the Massachusetts Electrical Code, came as a complete surprise to us. The cost of an emergency generator, approximately $25,000 to $27,000, was not included in the Construction Cost Estimate. Therefore, if this requirement stands , funding for the generator would have to be deducted from .the project budget , with con- sequent reductions in the quality of the building, most probably from those design items which are important to the City of Salem. The reference standard on which Mr. Condon's decision is based relates to the provision of power to the building 's fire protection system. The code permits the use of a power connection arrangement that costs roughly $300. While the alternate power source could fail in the remote chance of an area wide power failure, we feel the building will be adequately protected because the Salem Fire Department will be automatically alerted in the event of any emergency, and will respond within about one minute of the signal . As the city water pressure is adequate to operate the sprinkler systems in the building, it is inconceivable that even the remote chance of the simultaneous occurence of a power failure and a fire in the building presents a hazard to life or property in this development. The cost estimate indicated that the project is abou 5% over budget alread in large measure due to various design requirements o e ity. the code t� Page 2/STdA 9 January 1981 interpretation requiring the emergency generator stands, we will need to make compensatory reductions in the design. Please advise us at your earliest con- venience as to how you would like us to proceed. Very truly yours, STEPHEN TISE s ASSOCIATES, INC. J Mark T. Wil elm File 7916 Al Plrr@9NX0. COPY !AI Pf IC# ! , a Vk R" — — ERTtF! AOCCUPAt�C� CIN OF SALEM Issued�3 a 9 it 5a 11 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 06 of 3alein 8widin' Dept. DATE SEPTEMBER 29 TB '95 PERMIT NO. 526-1995 APPLICANT PAUL DAVIS SYSTEMS ADDRESS PO BOX 532 1481 (NO.) (STREET) (OONTR'S LICENSE) CITY WAKEFIELD STATE MAZIPCODE 01880 TEL.NO. - - PERMIT TO ALTERATIONAPARTMENT BUILDING NUMBER OF _.._. (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. STORY (PROPOSED USE) DWELLINGUNITS - Ar(LocnnoN) 0027 CHARTER STREET ZONINGDIS (NO.) (NO.) (STREET) BETWEEN AND ' (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION MAF' 35 LOT 0_'-72BLOCK ¢E 26489 SO FTE— BUILDING T BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BY FT.LONG BY FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: REPAIR. FIRE DAMAGED INTERIOR : DRYWALL. K I TCH CABINETS. M I SC R�EPA I N (Apt. #406) . AREA OR VOLUME ESTIMATED COST FEE 15 Q . 000V ?zI. mw (CUBICISQUARE FEET) OWNER SALEM HOUSING AUTHOR17Y BUILDING DEPT. ADDRESS ^c7 CHARTER ST BY :J.J.J. Job Site Copy - Duplicate • � CITY OF SALEM "BUILDING 1 s SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 „RM 1T DATE Sept. 29, 19 95 PERMIT NO. 526-95 APPLICANT Paul Davis Systems ADDRESS PO BOX 532 1481 (NO.) (STREET) ICONTR'S LICENSE) CITY Wakefield STATE MA ZIPCODE 01880 TEL.NO. PERMITTO Alteration (_) STORY Apt. Building NUMBER OF (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. (PROPOSED USE) DWELLING UNITS- AT(LOCATION) NITSAT(LOCATION) 27 Charter St. ZONING B-5 (NO.) (STREET) BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) LOT SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BV FT.LONG BV FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: Repair Fire damaged interior: Drywall, Kitchen cabinets, & Misc. repairs Apt. 11406 AREA OR 15,000. PERMIT 90.00 VOLUME ESTIMATED COST$ FEE (CUBICISQUARE FEET) OWNER Salem Housing Authority atter t. BUILDING DEPT. ADDRESS BY THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TOOCCUPY ANY STREET.ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF,EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY,ENCROACHMENTS 000. ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION,STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF THREE CALL INSPECTIONS APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS CARD KEPT WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: POSTEDUNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. WHERE A PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS. ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND 2,PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. MEMBERS(READY TO LATH). NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 3.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS 1 1 1 BOARD OF HEALTH GAS INSPECTION APPROVALS FIRE DEPT.INSPECTING APPROVALS 1 1 3/ixly6 D/C Ftc�e� OTHER CITY ENGINEER 2 2 WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE [PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION WORK ISINSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARD INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS OT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BV TELEPHONE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION S NOTED ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION.