0010 CHARLES STREET - BUILDING JACKET -__
10 CHARLES STREET
1
Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector before a permit will be granted.
City of Salem Ward
na
Is Property Located in the
Historical District? Yes_ No-k- 7 V T -71
R Home Phone# 7
Is Property Located in a , y
Conservation Area? Yes_ No-L/-. ''+ ,3 Bus.Phone#
APPLICATION p
FOR p�
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCTV9e6AND. 9
Salem,Mass.,
TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned hereby applies for a permit to build according to the following sIpecifications: C�,. nq
Owner's name and address n0 1-e In 9 P—,2 a 4 ('7r 0 O Y)0 rco /� C.bC.Q�-�PS .S�f-
Architect's name A ) ( A4
Mechanic's name and address 10.1 R
Location of building, No.
What is the purpose of building? //r✓
Material of building? p
-r t rin L,2
If a dwelling,for how many families?
Will the building c nform to the requirements of the law? a/.O
Estimated cost Contractors Lic. No.
Signature of applicant_ 9� y_ t' a'
Signed Under4he Penalty of Perjury
REMARKS
i �.
No. — Ward
APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
SWIMMING POOL
Location / c) C&6:r lns
PERMIT GRANTED
199.3
Ap ove
C 8 "ding In ector
r�
fCitti of -'&tlem, Ifflttssuchusetts
-Battra of A, peal
r
2 o
DECISION-ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES_STREET - - (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 11, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Stephen C. Touchette, V. Chairman; George Ahmed,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an
existing deck that encroaches on rear setback to remain as is.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The granting of the variance will continue to allow petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. It is not feasible to locate the deck in any other portion of the
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD FOR A VARIANCE AT
10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector.
5. Exterior finishes of the deck shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
August 11, 1993
i
Step en O'Grady, Mem er H
Board of Appeal
o;
= � w
a c
- m
T A
rA `Q
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAY & NORENE GACHIGNARD
FOR VARIANCE AT 10 CHARLES STREET, SALEM
.r .
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
:7~
r+
� c.o
c.�